UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

x

Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018.

OR

¨

Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from              to             .

Commission File Number: 000-31127

 

SPARTANNASH COMPANY

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

Michigan

 

38-0593940

(State or Other Jurisdiction) of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

 

850 76th Street, S.W.

P.O. Box 8700

Grand Rapids, Michigan

 

49518-8700

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (616) 878-2000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act:

 

Title of Class

 

Name of Exchange on which Registered

Common Stock, no par value

 

NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File requirementrequired to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, (as definedor emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).

Act.

Large accelerated filer

 

x

 

Accelerated filer

 

¨

 

Non-accelerated filer

 

¨

 

Smaller reporting company

 

¨

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates based on the last sales price of such stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on July 18, 201513, 2018 (which was the last trading day of the registrant’s second quarter in the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016)December 29, 2018) was $1,197,681,942.$910,826,011.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, no par value, as of February 26, 201625, 2019 was 37,285,140,35,952,014, all of one class.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14

  

Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting to be held June 2, 2016May 22, 2019

 

 

 

 


Forward-Looking Statements

The matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in the Company’s press releases and in the Company’s website-accessible conference calls with analysts and investor presentations include “forward-looking statements” about the plans, strategies, objectives, goals or expectations of SpartanNash Company and subsidiaries (“SpartanNash” or “the Company”the “Company”). These forward-looking statements are identifiable by words or phrases indicating that SpartanNash or management “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “believes,” or “estimates,” or that a particular occurrence or event “will,” “may,” “could,” “should”“should,” or “will likely” result, occur or be pursued or “continue” in the future, that the “outlook” or “trend” is toward a particular result or occurrence, that a development is an “opportunity,” “priority,” “strategy,” “focus,” that the Company is “positioned” for a particular result, or similarly stated expectations. Accounting estimates, such as those described under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies” in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are inherently forward-looking. The Company’s asset impairment and restructuring cost provisions are estimates and actual costs may be more or less than these estimates and differences may be material. YouUndue reliance should not place undue reliancebe placed on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of the Annual Report, other report, release, presentation, or statement.

In addition to other risks and uncertainties described in connection with the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), there are many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.

The These risks and uncertainties include general business conditions, changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer spending, the Company’s ability to achieve salesintegrate acquired assets, the impact of competition and earnings expectations; improve operating results; continue to realize benefitsother factors which are often beyond the control of the merger with Nash-Finch Company, (including realizationand other risks listed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” of synergies); maintainthis report and risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or strengthen retail-store performance; assimilate acquired distribution centers and stores; maintain or grow sales; respond successfully to competitors including remodels and new openings; maintain or improve gross margin; effectively address food cost or price inflation or deflation; maintain and improve customer and supplier relationships; realize expected synergies from merger and acquisition activity; realize expected benefits of restructuring; realize growth opportunities; maintain or expand its customer base; reduce operating costs; sell on favorable terms assets held for sale; generate cash; continue to meet the terms of the Company’s debt covenants; continue to pay dividends, and successfully implement and realize the expected benefits of the other programs, initiatives, systems, plans, priorities, strategies, objectives, goals or expectations described in this Annual Report, the Company’s other reports, press releases and public comments will be affected by changes in economic conditions generally or in the geographic areas that the Company serves, adverse effects of the changing food and distribution industries, adverse changes in government funded consumer assistance programs, possible changes in the military commissary system, including those stemming from the redeployment of forces, congressional action, changes in funding levels, or the effects of mandated reductions in or sequestration of government expenditures, and other factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in the “Risk Factors” discussion in Item 1A of this Annual Report.

currently deems immaterial.

This section and the discussions contained in Item 1A,1A. “Risk Factors,” and in Item 7, subheading “Critical Accounting Policies” in this report, both of which are incorporated here by reference, are intended to provide meaningful cautionary statements for purposes of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This should not be construed as a complete list of all of the economic, competitive, governmental, technological and other factors that could adversely affect the Company’s expected consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to SpartanNash or that SpartanNash currently believes are immaterial also may impair its business, operations, liquidity, financial condition and prospects. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements to reflect developments that occur or information obtained after the date of this Annual Report.

 


-2-


PART I

 

Item 1.Business

Overview

SpartanNash Company (together with its subsidiaries, “SpartanNash” or “the Company”the “Company”) is a leading multi-regional grocery distributor and grocery retailer and the largest distributor, by revenue, of grocery products to military commissaries in the United States. The Company’sFortune 400 company whose core businesses include distributing grocery products to a diverse group of independent and chain retailers, its corporate owned retail stores, and military commissaries and exchanges and independent and corporate-owned retail stores primarily locatedexchanges. SpartanNash serves customer locations in 47 states andall 50 United States (“U.S.”), the District of Columbia, Europe, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Honduras, Bahrain, Djibouti and Egypt. Through its Military segment, the Company is the exclusive worldwide supplier of private brand products to U.S. military commissaries. The Company’s Retail segment operates supermarkets that have a “neighborhood market” focus to distinguish them from supercenters and limited assortment stores. The Company operates three reportable business segments: Military, Food Distribution, Military and Retail. For

The Company’s fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to December 31. The following discussion is as of and for the fiscal years ending or ended December 28, 2019 ("2019"), December 29, 2018 (“2018” or “current year”), December 30, 2017 (“2017” or “prior year”) and December 31, 2016 (“2016”), all of which include 52 weeks. All fiscal quarters are 12 weeks, except for the Company’s first quarter, which is 16 weeks and will generally include the Easter holiday. The fourth quarter includes the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays, and depending on the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016,end, may include the Company generated net sales of approximately $7.7 billion.New Year’s holiday.

Established in 1917 as a cooperative grocery distributor, Spartan Stores Inc. (“Spartan Stores”) converted to a for-profit business corporation in 1973. In January 1999, Spartan Stores began to acquire retail supermarkets in its focused geographic regions. In August 2000, Spartan Stores common stock became listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “SPTN.” On November 19, 2013, Spartan Stores merged with Nash-Finch Company (“Nash-Finch”). Nash-Finch’s core businesses include distributing food to military commissaries and independent grocery retailers and distributing to and operating corporate-owned retail stores. Following completion of the merger, the combined company iswas named SpartanNash Company. Unless the context otherwise requires, the use of the terms “SpartanNash,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company”the “Company” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refers to the surviving corporation SpartanNash Company and, as applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries.

The Company’s hybriddifferentiated business model supports the close functioning of its Military, Food Distribution, Military and Retail operations optimizingutilizes the natural complementscomplementary nature of each business segment while also enhancingand enhances the ability of the Company’s independent retailers to compete long term in the grocery industry.industry long-term. The model produces operational efficiencies, helps stimulate distribution product demand, and provides sharper visibility and broader business growth options. In addition, the Military,diversification of the Food Distribution, Military and Retail diversificationsegments provides added flexibility to pursue the best long-term growth opportunities in each segment.

SpartanNash has established key management priorities-2-


SpartanNash’s mission is to leverage our expertise in food distribution and retail to develop, activate and provide impactful solutions that exceed expectations for associates, customers and business partners. In addition, the Company strives to create value for the longer-term strategyCompany's shareholders, retailers, and customers. To support these objectives, the Company has the following priorities and strategies within its Food Distribution, Military, and Retail segments:

Food Distribution Segment:

Maximize growth opportunities by leveraging the Company’s unique combination of supply chain capabilities and retail competency to exceed the expectations of current and prospective customers.

Optimize and grow the supply chain network to create a highly efficient national distribution platform that provides innovative and impactful supply chain solutions for a variety of different sales channels.

Proactively pursue financially and strategically attractive acquisition opportunities.

Transform the SpartanNash fresh, fresh-prepared produce and prepared meal solutions to differentiate our offerings and increase market share.

Continue to elevate private brands to a best-in-class offering that matches customer needs and preferences through a selection of private brands focused on quality, value, variety, taste and convenience.

Capitalize on opportunities for growth and diversification in the non-traditional space by growing with the Company’s national customers and developing flexible solutions.

Military Segment:

Continue to support the partnership with the Defense Commissary Agency (“DeCA”) through continued expansion of its private brand initiative and overall goal of increasing business at the commissaries by offering one-stop shopping and value for military customers.

Grow the business through additional product offerings to DeCA and by developing a produce solution for the territories the Company serves.

Leverage the size and scale of the Company, including establishing a well-differentiated product offering for its Military,Company’s Food Distribution and Retail segments to attract additional customers to the Company’s Military platform, while leveraging the Company’s strong supply chain network.

Retail Segment:

Continue the expansion of the Company’s refreshed brand positioning and additional strategies designed to createexecute a more significant implementation in 2019, which will enhance the customer’s store experience.

Provide customers with high quality fresh offerings, value for its shareholders, retailersbeyond price, affordable wellness, focus on local, indulgence and customers. These priorities are:discovery in the shopping experience and social consciousness and responsibility all with a best-in-class customer experience.

Military:

Leverage the size and scale of the existing Food Distribution and Retail segments to attract additional customers.

 

Continue to partner with Coastal Pacific Food Distributors,Increase customer satisfaction and loyalty by providing quicker, more convenient shopping experiences through the second largest worldwide military distributor, by revenue,continued expansion of foodFast Lane, the Company’s e-commerce solution, which offers online ordering, curbside pick-up and related products to leveragedelivery services. Invest in additional technologies that improve the advantage of a worldwide distribution network.customer experience.

Successfully integrate Martin’s Super Markets (“Martin’s”), a retailer acquired in early 2019, to leverage Martin’s existing strong brand and execution in the northern Indiana and southwest Michigan markets, while balancing the support, scale and execution strategies of the Company.

Supply Chain Network:

Execute innovative solutions to both meet the demands of the Company’s growing Food Distribution:Distribution segment customers as well as to combat current transportation industry headwinds.

Leverage the Company’s competitive position, scale and financial flexibility to further grow its distribution channels through existing and new solutions.

Gain efficiency and productivity by leveraging one supply chain network across segments to further realize benefits from continued investments in the optimization of the supply chain network.

Achieve best-in-class fill rates through stronger collaboration processes with vendors and warehouse operations partners. Realize benefits through instituting a vendor and carrier compliance program and leveraging current technologies in both replenishment and inventory management.

-3-


Food Distribution Segment

The Company’s Food Distribution segment uses a multi-channel sales approach to distribute grocery products to independent retailers, national retailers, food service distributors, e-commerce providers, and the Company’s corporate owned retail stores. Total net sales from the Company’s Food Distribution segment, including sales to corporate owned retail stores that are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements, totaled approximately $4.8 billion for 2018. As of the end of 2018, the Company believes it is the fifth largest wholesale distributor, in terms of annual revenue, to supermarkets in the United States.

Customers. The Company’s Food Distribution segment supplies grocery products to a diverse group of approximately 2,100 independent retail locations with operations ranging from a single store to regional supermarket chains, food service distributors and the Company’s corporate owned retail stores. As of December 29, 2018, the Company operates in all 50 states by leveraging a platform of 19 distribution centers, as well as third party shipping partners, servicing the Food Distribution and Military segments, with the greatest sales concentration in the Midwest and South regions. This extensive geographic reach drives economies of scale and provides opportunities for independent retailers to purchase products at competitive prices in order to effectively compete in the grocery industry long-term.

Through its Food Distribution segment, the Company also services national retailers, including Dollar General. Sales to Dollar General are made to approximately 15,500 of its retail locations, with sales representing 16.4%, 14.0%, and 11.2% of consolidated net sales for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company’s Food Distribution customer base is diverse, and no other single customer exceeded 3% of consolidated net sales in any of the years presented.

The Company’s ten largest Food Distribution customers (excluding corporate owned retail stores) accounted for approximately 58% of total Food Distribution net sales for 2018. Approximately 85% of Food Distribution net sales for 2018 are covered under supply agreements with retailer customers.

Products. The Company’s Food Distribution segment provides a selection of approximately 60,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs) of nationally branded and private brand grocery products (see “Marketing and Merchandising – Private Brands”) and perishable food products, including dry groceries, produce, dairy products, meat, delicatessen items, bakery goods, frozen food, seafood, floral products, general merchandise, beverages, tobacco products, health and beauty care products and pharmacy. The product offering also includes fresh protein-based foods, prepared meals, and value-added products such as fresh-cut fruits and vegetables and prepared salads, which the Company manufactures. These product offerings, along with best in class services, allow independent retailers the opportunity to support the majority of their operations with a single supplier.

Valued-Added Services. The Company provides a comprehensive menu of valued-added services designed to assist independent retailers in becoming more profitable, efficient, competitive, and informed. The Company’s service departments are strategic partners who provide solutions when time and resources are limited for the independent customers. From real estate and site surveys to a full spectrum of merchandising and marketing solutions, independent retailers can find the support they need to effectively operate their businesses. The Company provides over 100 distinct value-added services, including the following:

●   Retail Development and Consulting

  

Develop new solutions for customers.   Consumer Research

          ●   Website design

 

Use retail competency   Site development and combined distribution platform capabilities to increase business within the existing account base and to potentially add new distribution categories and take advantage of current competitive dynamics to supply new customers.store design

●   Merchandising

  

Increase private brand penetration and overall purchase concentration.   Product Reclamation

●   Marketing and Advertising Solutions

  

Enhance the value-added offer to further meet the needs of customers.   Inventory Support

Retail:

●   Shelf Management and Planograms

  

Evaluate banners to maintain a portfolio of customer-relevant offerings.   Category Management

●   Accounting, Payroll and Tax Preparation

  

Drive a lean   Customer Service and efficient operating cost structure to remain competitive.Order Entry

●   Food Safety and Environmental Health

  

Rationalize store base to maximize capital efficiency   Pharmacy Retail and enhance profitability.Procurement Services

●   Asset Protection

  

Deploy capital to modernize the existing store base.   Retail Pricing

●   Supply Solutions

 

Pursue opportunistic roll-ups of existing distribution customers and/or other retailers.   Associate Training

●   E- Commerce

  

Expand consumer relationships with pharmacy, fuel   Information Services and other promotional offerings.

-3-


Supply Chain:

Leverage new competitive position, scale and financial flexibility to further grow the distribution channel.

Gain efficiencies in all aspects of the supply chain through optimization of the distribution center network.Technology Solutions

Military Segment

The Company’s Military segment contracts with manufacturers and brokers to distribute a wide variety of grocery products, including dry groceries, beverages, meat, and frozen foods, primarily to U.S. military commissaries and exchanges. The Company’s Military segment, together with its partner, Coastal Pacific Food Distributors (“CPFD”), represents the only delivery solution to service DeCA worldwide.

The distributed-4-


DeCA operates a chain of 237 commissaries on U.S. military installations across the world that sells approximately $4.6 billion of grocery products are deliveredannually. The Company distributes grocery products to 169160 military commissaries and over 442450 exchanges located in 3739 states across the United States and the District of Columbia, Europe, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Honduras, Bahrain, Djibouti and Egypt. The Company’s distribution centers are strategically located among the largest concentration of military bases in the areas the Company serves and near Atlantic ports used to ship grocery products to overseas commissaries and exchanges.

The Company’s Military segment has an outstanding reputation as a distributor focused onCompany is also the DeCA exclusive worldwide supplier of private brand grocery and related products to all U.S. military commissaries and exchanges, based in large measureexchanges. In accordance with its contract with DeCA, the Company procures the grocery and related products from various manufacturers and upon receiving customer orders from DeCA either delivers the products to the U.S. military commissaries itself or engages CPFD to deliver the products on its excellent service metrics, which include fill rate, on-time deliverybehalf. There are over 700 SKUs of private brand products currently in the DeCA system as of December 29, 2018, and shipping accuracy.the Company anticipates up to 1,000 SKUs will be active within the program by the end of 2019.

The Defense Commissary Agency (“DeCA”) operates a chain of commissaries on U.S. military installations throughout the world. DeCA contracts with manufacturers to obtain grocery and related products for the commissary system. Manufacturers either deliver the products to the commissaries themselves or, more commonly, contract with distributors such as SpartanNash to deliver the products. Manufacturers must authorize the distributors as their official representatives to DeCA, and the distributors must adhere to DeCA’s frequent delivery system (“FDS”) procedures governing matters such as product identification, ordering and processing, information exchange and resolution of discrepancies. The Company obtains distribution contracts with manufacturers through competitive bidding processes and direct negotiations.

TheAs of December 29, 2018, the Company has approximately 250 distribution contracts representing approximately 600 manufacturers that supply products to the DeCA commissary system and various exchange systems. TheGenerally, larger contracts or those subject to a request-for-proposal process have definitive durations, whereas the smaller contracts generally have an indefinite term, but may be terminatedterms; and all contract types allow for termination by either party without cause upon 30 days prior written notice to the other party. The contracts typically specify thewhich commissaries and exchanges to supply on behalf of the manufacturer, the manufacturer’s products to be supplied, service and delivery requirements, and pricing and payment terms. terms. The Company’s ten largest manufacturer customers represented approximately 40%44.9% of the Company’s Military segment sales for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016.2018.

As commissaries need to be restocked, DeCA identifies the manufacturer with which an order is to be placed, determines which distributor is the manufacturer’s official representative for a particular commissary or exchange location, and then places a product order with that distributor under the auspices of DeCA’s master contract with the applicable manufacturer. The distributor selects that product from its existing inventory, delivers it to the commissary or commissaries designated by DeCA, and bills the manufacturer for the product shipped. The manufacturer then bills DeCA under the terms of its master contract. Overseas commissaries are serviced in a similar fashion, except that a distributor’s responsibility is to deliver products as and when needed to the port designated by DeCA, which in turn bears the responsibility for shipping the product to the applicable commissary or overseas warehouse. Due to the unique terms of this arrangement, working capital requirements are significant.

After the Company ships a particular manufacturer’s products to commissaries in response to an order from DeCA, the Company invoices the manufacturer for the product price plus a service and/or drayage fee that is typically based on a percentage of the purchase price, butprice. In some instances, invoices may in some cases be based on a dollar amount per case or per pound of product sold. The Company’s order handling and invoicing activities are facilitated by its procurement and billing systems developed specifically for the Military business, which addressesaddress the unique aspects of its business, and providesprovide the Company’s manufacturer customers with a web-based, interactive means of accessing critical order, inventory and delivery information.

Food Distribution Segment

The Company’s Food Distribution segment uses a multi-platform sales approach to distribute grocery products to independent retail locations and corporate-owned retail stores. Total net sales from the Company’s Food Distribution segment, including sales to corporate-owned retail stores that are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements, were approximately $4.3 billion for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016. As of the end of fiscal 2015, the Company believes that it is the fifth largest wholesale distributor, by revenue, to supermarkets in the United States.

Customers. The Company’s Food Distribution segment supplies grocery products to a diverse group of independent grocery store operators ranging from a single store to supermarket chains with over 20 stores; and also supplies the Company’s corporate-owned retail stores. The Company operates in 47 states with 12 distribution centers supporting approximately 2,100 independently owned supermarkets and also supplies its 163 corporate-owned retail stores. This larger geographic reach allows for increased scale as the Company leverages the organization to enhance the ability of its independent retailers to compete long-term in the grocery industry.

-4-


The Company services a national retailer, Dollar General, through its Food Distribution segment. Sales are made to more than 13,000 retail locations for this customer, representing 10.7% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2015. Sales to this customer did not exceed 10% of consolidated net sales for any other year presented. The Company’s Food Distribution customer base is diverse, and no other single customer exceeded 5% of consolidated net sales in any of the years presented.

The Company’s five largest Food Distribution customers (excluding corporate-owned retail stores) accounted for approximately 39% of total Food Distribution net sales for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016. In addition, approximately 84% of Food Distribution net sales, including intercompany sales to corporate-owned retail stores, are covered under supply agreements with independent customers or are directly controlled by SpartanNash.

Products. The Company’s Food Distribution segment provides a selection of approximately 56,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs) of nationally branded and private label grocery products (see “Marketing and Merchandising – Private Brands”) and perishable food products, including dry groceries, produce, dairy products, meat, delicatessen items, bakery goods, frozen food, seafood, floral products, general merchandise, beverages, tobacco products, health and beauty care products and pharmacy. These product offerings, along with best in class services, allow independent retailers the opportunity to support their entire operations with a single supplier. Meeting consumers’ needs will continue to be SpartanNash’s mission as it executes its hybrid business model of wholesale, retail and military supply.

Additional Services. The Company offers and provides many of its independent Food Distribution customers with value-added services, including:

●   Site identification and market analysis

●   Coupon redemption

●   Store planning and development

●   Product reclamation

●   Marketing, promotion and advertising

●   Graphic services

●   Website design, technology and information services

●   Category management

●   Accounting, payroll and tax preparation

●   Real estate services

●   Human resource services

●   Construction management services

●   Fuel technology

●   Pharmacy retail and procurement services

●   Account management field sales support

●   Retail pricing

●   InSite Business to Business communications

●   Security consulting and investigation services

Retail Segment

The Company’s neighborhood market strategy distinguishes its corporate-owned retail stores from supercenters and limited assortment stores by emphasizing convenient locations, demographically-targeted merchandise selections, high-quality fresh offerings, customer service, value pricing and community involvement.

The Company’s Retail segmentAs of December 29, 2018, the Company operates 163 corporate-owned139 corporate owned retail stores in eight states, predominantly in the Midwest, and Great Lakes which operate primarily under the banners of Family Fare Supermarkets, Family Fresh Markets, D&W Fresh Markets, Market, VG’s Grocery, Dan’s Supermarket and Sun MartFamily Fresh Market. With the acquisition of Martin’s on December 31, 2018, the Company now operates an additional 21 corporate owned retail stores in northern Indiana and southwestern Michigan. Retail banners and numbers of stores are more fully detailed in Item 2, “Properties,” of this report. The Company’s corporate owned retail stores range in size from approximately 14,000 to 90,000 total square feet, or on average, approximately 41,000 total square feet per store.

The Company’s corporate-ownedneighborhood market strategy distinguishes its corporate owned retail stores from supercenters and limited assortment stores by focusing on value beyond price, affordable wellness, commitment to local products, indulgence and discovery in the shopping experience and caring for the community and environment. The Company’s strategy is also focused on increasing customer satisfaction through quality service and convenience. Through the Company’s e-commerce solution, Fast Lane, as well as other third party providers, the Company offers online grocery shopping and curbside pickup or delivery at 83 of its corporate owned retail locations.

-5-


The Company’s corporate owned retail stores offer nationally branded and private labelbrand grocery products (see “Marketing and Merchandising – Private Brands”) and, as well as perishable food products including dry groceries, produce, dairy products, meat, delicatessen items, bakery goods, frozen food, seafood, floral products, general merchandise, beverages, tobacco products and health and beauty care products. The private labelPrivate brand grocery products provide enhancedtypically generate higher retail margins and are believed to help improvewhile also improving customer loyalty. Theloyalty by offering quality products at affordable prices.

As of December 29, 2018, the Company also offers pharmacy services in 9182 of its corporate-owned retail stores. The Company’s corporate-ownedcorporate owned retail stores range(of which 72 of the pharmacies are owned) and operates one free-standing pharmacy location. The Company believes the pharmacy service offering in size from approximately 10,400 to 92,381 total square feet, or on average, approximately 41,300 total square feet per store.its corporate owned retail stores is an important part of the consumer experience. In its Michigan pharmacies and a number of its pharmacies in Minnesota and Nebraska, the Company offers free medications (antibiotics, diabetic medications and prenatal vitamins) along with low cost generic drugs, and meal planning solutions for preventative health and education for its customers.

TheAs of December 29, 2018, the Company operates 29 fuel centers primarily at its supermarket locationscorporate owned retail stores operating predominantly under the banners Family Fare Quick Stop, and D&W Quick Stop, VG’s Quick Stop, Forest Hills Quick Stop and Sun Mart Express Fuel. These fuel centers offer refueling facilities and in the adjacent convenience store, a limited variety of popular consumable products. The Company’s prototypical Quick Stop stores are approximately 1,100 square feet in size. The Company has experienced increased supermarket sales upon opening fuel centers and initiating cross-merchandising activities. The Company plans, as opportunities arise, to open additional fuel centers at certain of its supermarket locations over the next few years.

-5-


The Company’s corporate-owned retail stores are primarily the result of acquisitions from January 1999 to June 2015, including the merger with Nash-Finch in November 2013. The following chart details the changes in the number of corporate-ownedcorporate owned retail stores over the last five fiscal years, including the transition year ended December 28, 2013:

years:

March 31,

 

 

March 30,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

January 2,

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

 

2013

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

Number of stores at beginning of year

 

97

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

172

 

 

 

162

 

 

172

 

 

 

162

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

145

 

Stores acquired or added during year

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

7

 

Stores acquired or constructed during year

 

1

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stores closed or sold during year

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

6

 

 

11

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

6

 

Number of stores at end of year

 

96

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

172

 

 

 

162

 

 

 

163

 

 

162

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

139

 

During the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016,2018, the Company opened one new retail store in Dickinson, North Dakota, acquired six stores in Bismarck and Mandan, North Dakota, completed seven major remodels, and completed many other limitedfive remodels. The Company also converted six corporate-owned retail stores to the Family Fare banner.

The Company expects to continue making progresstargeted capital investments during 2019 in connection with its capital investment program during fiscal 2016 by completing 13 major remodels,retail brand positioning initiative. Where opportunities arise, the Company may open new retail and by opening additional fuel centerscenter locations or enteringenter into partnerships with existing fuel center operations. The Company will continue to evaluate its store base and may close three or foursell stores duringin 2019 in line with its store rationalization initiatives.

In the coursefirst quarter of 2016. The2019 the Company evaluates proposed projects based on demographicsacquired Martin’s, a leading family-owned and competition within each geographic area, and prioritizes projects based on their expected returns on investment. Approval of proposed capital projects requires a projected internal rate of return that meets or exceedsoperated Midwest independent supermarket chain. This acquisition expanded the Company’s policy; however,corporate retail footprint into the adjacent regions of northern Indiana and southwestern Michigan. Martin’s was previously a Food Distribution segment customer of the Company, may undertake projects that do not meet this standard to the extent they represent required maintenance or necessary infrastructure improvements. In addition, the Company performsand SpartanNash’s and Martin’s merchandising, marketing, and operations teams have a post completion reviewhistory of financial results versus its expectationworking collaboratively on all majormany business improvement projects. The Company believes that focusing on such measures provides it with an appropriate level of discipline in its capital expenditures process.

Supply Chain Network

The Company has integratedcontinues to integrate its supply chain organization to further optimize the network, increase asset utilization and leverage programs that will drive more value for its shareholders, retailers, and customers. The Company believes its distribution facilities are strategically located to efficiently serve current customers, and also have the available capacity to support future growth.shareholders. The Company continually evaluates inventory movementreviews the optimization of its network and, assigns SKUsthrough doing so, has expanded Food Distribution operations in select facilities which were previously dedicated solely to appropriate areas within its distribution facilities to reduce the time required to stock and pick products and to achieve additional efficiencies.Military segment. 

The Company has several projects planned for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. These projects are designed to further integrate the Company’s supply chain capabilities across distribution centers and thereby increase efficiency of both inbound and outbound distribution operations. To demonstrate the Company’s commitment across the entire network, the Company has invested in uniformly branding all tractors with a new logo that embodies the Company’s tagline, “Taking Food Places.” Newly purchased trailers will also receive the new logo layout. Over the next two years, the Company plans to re-logo all existing trailers within the SpartanNash supply chain. This will allow the Company to increase asset utilization by sharing resources across all facility locations.

Supply Chain Functions. The Company’s distribution network is comprisedcomposed of 19 distribution centers, 7 of which primarily service the Military segment and 12 of whichare utilized to service the Food Distribution segment, withand Military segments. The distribution centers provide for approximately 9.18.6 million total square feet of warehouse space. The Company has new and ongoing initiatives to improve the efficiency of its supply chain through innovation, investments in technology and automation.

The Company operates a fleet of approximately 490with over 500 over-the-road tractors, 575450 dry vans, and 9601,000 refrigerated trailers.trailers and has begun adding a fleet of multi-temperature straight trucks to improve its delivery performance to its growing number of smaller format store customers. Through routing optimization systems, the Company carefully manages the millions ofmore than 64 million miles driven by its fleet drivesand third-party carriers annually servicing its military commissaries, exchanges, independent retailers, national account locationsretailers and corporate-owned supermarkets. The Company has also equipped some of its refrigerated trailers with a refrigeration unit that has the capability to run on electric standby, offering an economicalcorporate owned retail stores.

Reporting Segment Financial Data and environmentally friendly alternative to diesel fuel. The Company remains committedProducts

Refer to the ongoing investment requiredsegment information in the notes to maintain a best in class fleet while focusing on low cost, environmentally friendly solutions.

Products

The Company offers a wide variety of grocery products, general merchandise and health and beauty care, pharmacy, fuel and other items and services. The consolidated net sales includefinancial statements for additional information about the net sales of its Military segment, corporate-owned stores and fuel centers in its Retail segment and the net sales of its Food Distribution business, which excludes sales to affiliated stores.

-6-


The following table presentsCompany’s sales by type of similar productproducts and services:

 

January 2, 2016

 

January 3, 2015

 

December 28, 2013

(In thousands, except percentages)

(52 Weeks)

 

(53 Weeks)

 

(39 Weeks)

Non-perishables (1)

$

 

4,845,763

 

 

 

63.3

 

%

 

$

 

4,998,895

 

 

 

63.1

 

%

 

$

 

1,393,157

 

 

 

53.6

 

%

Perishables (2)

 

 

2,373,829

 

 

 

31.0

 

 

 

 

 

2,449,562

 

 

 

31.0

 

 

 

 

 

894,783

 

 

 

34.5

 

 

Pharmacy

 

 

310,377

 

 

 

4.1

 

 

 

 

 

289,494

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

 

 

163,659

 

 

 

6.3

 

 

Fuel

 

 

122,004

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

 

178,111

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

 

 

145,631

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

Consolidated net sales

$

 

7,651,973

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

$

 

7,916,062

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

$

 

2,597,230

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

(1)

Consists primarily of general merchandise, grocery, beverages, snacks and frozen foods.

(2)

Consists primarily of produce, dairy, meat, bakery, deli, floral and seafood.

Reporting Segment Financial Data

More detailed information about the Company’s reporting segments can be found in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, which is herein incorporated by reference.services. All of the Company’s sales and assets are in the United States of America. Consolidated net sales include the net sales of its Food Distribution segment, which exclude sales to corporate owned retail stores, the net sales of its Military segment, and the net sales of its corporate owned retail stores and fuel centers in its Retail segment.

-6-


Discontinued Operations

Certain of the Company’s Retail and Food Distribution and Retail segment operations have been recorded as discontinued operations. Discontinued operations consist of certain locations that have been closed or sold. Additional information may be found in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, which is herein incorporated by reference.

Marketing and Merchandising

General. The Company continues to align its marketing and merchandising strategies with current consumer behaviors by delivering initiatives centered on personalization, a multi-channel experience, value beyond price, affordable wellness, local focus, indulgence and healthdiscovery and wellness.social responsibility – all designed to enhance the shopping experience. During 2018, the Company continued to refresh its brand positioning for Family Fare, its primary retail banner, to incorporate these areas of focus and respond to evolving customer needs. These strategies seek to use consumer data and insights to deliver products, promotions, content and experiences to satisfy the consumer’s needs.

The Company believes that data from its “yes Rewards”yes”™ loyalty program gives it competitive insight into consumer shopping behavior. This gives the Company the flexibility to adapt to rapidly changing conditions by making tactical and more effective adjustments to its marketing and merchandising programs. In fiscal 2015,As investments are made to remodel and/or rebanner various stores, the Company expanded its continues to roll out the “yes Rewards”™ program to certain Family Fare and Family Fresh Markets stores in the western geographic areas and also provided a digital coupon program to its independent retailers.  

The Company’s investment to further strengthenexpand its knowledge of the consumer has resulted in progress in several areas: robust self-serve data tool that enables it to make consumer centric merchandisingits customers and marketing decisions; the development of a customer strategy that will be used to guide its internal business processes and go-to market strategy; and the evolution of its customer segmentation that takes it beyond the purchase and transactional behavior to lifestyle. These accomplishments are building blocks and will ultimately enable the Company to provide a shopping experience that better meets the changing needs of the consumer.  

Through its numerous strategic partnerships, the Company is able to develop its enterprise approach to customer centricity; benefiting both its Retail and Food Distribution businesses. By harnessing its proprietary data, the Company is able to provide a set of tools and capabilities for the organization that enables the Company to provide its customers with a more relevant and personalized shopping experience. This effort also enablesloyalty rewards in additional markets. During fiscal 2019, the Company will also begin using artificial intelligence to continue to learn more aboutdevelop and optimize its best customers; develop strategies to enable long-term customer and supplier loyalty; deploy a more effective and efficient marketing spend; and ultimately make better business decisions.weekly circular.

The Company has been building tools and capabilities to enable relevant, personalized content across its marketing channels and focusing on expanding its digital, social and mobile capabilities. Mobile apps specific to each retail banner, provide consumers with the ability to view store ads, create shopping lists, shop via Fast Lane, clip coupons, and join virtual shopping clubs from their mobile device. The Company also implementedpiloted a number of capabilities that enables it to more effectively target consumersmobile self-checkout application, and more efficiently develop and execute campaigns. Thisexpanded its e-commerce platform. These enhancements will help the Company to further build longer-term customer loyalty through convenience and value, maintain efficient marketing spend and increase return on investment, improve its sales growth opportunities, and further strengthen its business position. As the Company continues to build these capabilities, along with its other strategies, the Company will continue to share its marketing and merchandising learnings and best practices across its wholesaleindependent customer base.  base within the Food Distribution segment.

-7-


TheIn addition to sharing the expertise gained in its Retail operations, the Company also believes it can differentiatedifferentiates itself from its competitors by offering a full set of value-added support services from value added services into its Food Distribution segmentcustomers. These services, which are further described above, help the independent retailers to operate and compete effectively, and many of them are not offered by the inclusion ofCompany’s competition.

As the Company works to better differentiate its Retail stores and implement its refreshed brand positioning, the Company is selectively adding products and services to better meet customers’ changing needs. For instance, the Company is adding full service meat and seafood departments which include many items handmade in store, and has added produce preparation services, smokehouses, expanded beer and wine selections, and other offerings to enhance the customers’ experience. The Company has been refreshing its in-store messaging and décor. Signage and displays are being updated in departments such as pet products, laundry, and snacks in order to improve foot traffic in these aisles and drive sales. The Company continues to add fuel centers and Starbucks Coffeeor Caribou Coffee shops in some of its corporate-ownedcertain corporate owned retail stores. The Companystores, and also provides consumers with fuel purchase discounts onat fuel purchases atcenters through its fuel centers. In 2015, the Company began offering fuel programs in the western geographic areascorporate owned retail stores or by partnering with third party fuel centers. In addition, the Company also refined its fuel promotions and executed several pilots to further enhance its program and provide value to the customer.

The Company offers pharmacy services in 91 of its supermarkets and operates three free-standing pharmacy locations. The Company believes the pharmacy service offering in its supermarkets is an important part of the consumer experience. In its Michigan pharmacies, the Company offers free medications (antibiotics, diabetic medications and pre-natal vitamins) along with generic drugs for $4 and $10, and food solutions for preventative health and education for its customers. The Company has recently expanded these programs to a number of corporate-owned retail stores that have pharmacies in Minnesota and Nebraska.

As consumers increasingly emphasize health andaffordable wellness, the Company believes that it can be a provider and resource for products and services that will support their needs. In 2015,2018, the Company continued to expandexpanded its offerings and partnerships and undertook the following key initiatives. First, the Company continued to expand its “Living Well” conceptproduct offerings through store-within-a-store concepts and expanded product offerings.in-line merchandising concepts. Second, the Company established partnerships with health systems and providers to provide dietician-ledwellness specialist-led store tours to help educate consumers to make healthier food choices. Third, the Company increased its retail product offering and assortment for organic, gluten-free, meat-free, non-GMO products and other healthhealthier food options. Finally, the Company offers a best in class pharmacy program, including low cost generics and wellness options. Thefree diabetic and prenatal prescriptions.

In support of its commitment to local products and caring for the community and environment, the Company is also proud to work with local farmers and vendors to provide locally grown produce and products in many of its stores. The Company offers a significant selection of local products in many of its stores, well in excess of most of its competitors’ offerings. In some of its stores, the Company collects items from customers for recycling, and the Company has been recognized as a best-in-class recycler of its own waste. Also, in an effort to reduce costs and reduce its environmental footprint, the Company has many initiatives to reduce energy usage, including the installation of energy efficient lighting and refrigeration in its stores.

-7-


Private Brands. SpartanNash currently markets and distributes over 7,100 totalprovides a best-in-class private brand items primarily underprogram, offering a full line of proprietary and licensed private brands in its corporate owned retail stores and its independent retailer customers, as well as partnering with DeCA in the following labels: Spartan design and Our Family; Top Care (health and beauty care); Tippy Toes (baby); Full Circle (organic and wellness); B-leve (premium bath and beauty); PAWS Premium (pet supplies); and Valu Time (value). The Companylaunch of its private brand program. SpartanNash believes that its private brand offerings are partsome of its most valuable strategic assets, demonstrated through customer loyalty and profitability.

The Company has workedcontinues to develop a bestinvest in class private brand program. The Company has added more than 1,000 total corporate brand productsimprovements to its consumer offerings inprivate brands by offering quality, value, and assortment, and believes the past year, and as a resultsuccess of realigning its private brand programbrands to reduce the numberbe of duplicative product offerings, the Company plans to introduce approximately 500 new total items in fiscal 2016 to round out its portfolio.vital importance. The Company’s products have been frequently recognized for excellence in packaging design and product development. These awards underscore

The Company continues to enhance its private brand programs for both independent customers and corporate owned retail stores, and in 2018, completed the launch of its Our Family® private brand into its Michigan stores. The transition from the Spartan™ brand to Our Family® provides the Company with a company-wide, national brand equivalent or better quality program, while allowing the Company to streamline its supply chain to deliver a larger variety of product offerings at a lower cost to consumers. Additionally, Eternal Oceans™ was launched as the Company’s continued commitmentsustainability initiative for seafood within the Open Acres™ brand. SpartanNash also launched a product declaration “free from” initiative, with a goal of assigning brand specific bullets alerting consumers of certain undesirable ingredients that have been eliminated from products, creating a “cleaner” product offering. The Company expects this program to providingcontinue and become core to the consumer with quality products at exceptional value.Company’s product development principles in all future development. The Company’s focus is and will continueCompany plans to be the pursuit ofintroduce approximately 350 additional new opportunities and expansion ofitems in 2019 throughout its private brand offerings to its customers.portfolio.

SpartanNash currently markets and distributes private brand items primarily under the following brands: Our Family® (national brand equivalent or better grocery products); Open Acres™ (fresh products); Top Care (health and beauty care); Tippy Toes (baby); Full Circle™ (organic and wellness); Culinary Tours™ (premium quality foods); PAWS Premium (pet supplies); Valu Time (value) Simply Done (non-food products); and Pure Harmony (premium pet food). SpartanNash is also the exclusive worldwide distributor of DeCA’s private brands, Freedom’s Choice® and Home Base®.

Competition

The Company’s Military, Food Distribution, Military and Retail segments operate in a highly competitive geographic areas,industry, which typically resultresults in low profit margins for the industry as a whole. The Company competes with, among others, regional and national grocery distributors, large chain stores that have integrated wholesale and retail operations, mass merchandisers, e-commerce providers, deep discount retailers, limited assortment stores and wholesale membership clubs, many of whom have greater resources than the Company. The Company also faces competition from rapidly growing alternative retail channels, such as dollar stores, discount supermarket chains, Internet-based retailers and meal-delivery services.

The Food Distribution segment competes directly with a number of traditional and specialty grocery wholesalers and retailers that maintain or develop self-distribution systems for the business of independent grocery retailers. In addition, the Company’s independent customers face intense competition from supercenters, deep discounters, mass merchandisers, limited assortment stores, and e-commerce providers. The Company partners with its customers to help them compete effectively. The primary competitive factors in the Food Distribution business include price, service level, product quality, variety and other value-added services.

The Company is one of fewer than five distributors in the United States with annual sales to the DeCA commissary system in excess of $100 million that distributes products via the frequent delivery system. The remaining distributors that supply DeCA tend to be smaller regional and local providers. In addition, manufacturers contract with others to deliver certain products, such as baking supplies, produce, delidelicatessen items, soft drinks and snack items, directly to DeCA commissaries and service exchanges. Because of the narrowlow margins in this industry, it is of critical importance for distributors to achieve economies of scale, which is typically a function of the density or concentration of military bases within the geographic area(s) a distributor serves. As a result, no single distributor in this industry, by itself, has a nationwide presence. Rather, distributors tend togenerally concentrate on specific regions, or areas within specific regions, where they can achieve critical mass and utilize warehouse and distribution facilities efficiently. In addition, distributors that operate larger non-military specific distribution businesses tend to compete for DeCA commissary business in areas where such business would enable them to more efficiently utilize the capacity of their existing distribution centers. The Company believes the principal competitive factors among distributors within this industry are customer service, price, operating efficiencies, reputation with DeCA and location of distribution centers. The Company believes its competitive position is very strong with respect to all of these factors within the geographic areas where it competes.

The primary competitive factors in Despite the Food Distribution business include price, service,ongoing commissary sales challenges, the Company has been working diligently to realize opportunities and has expanded vendor relationships to new military bases and continues to roll out DeCA’s private brand product quality, variety and other value-added services.offerings. The Company believes its overall service level,that the private brand offering, when fully executed, will help drive more traffic and business into the commissaries as a whole. By providing a combination of national and private brand products, the commissaries are offering one-stop shopping for military consumers, which is defined as actual units shipped divided by actual units ordered, is among industry leaders in termsshould benefit all of performance.the constituents of the DeCA system.

-8--8-


The principal competitive factors in the retail groceryRetail business include the location and image of the store; the price, quality and variety of the perishable products;fresh offering; and the quality, convenience and consistency of service. In addition to competing with traditional grocery stores, the Company competes with supercenters, deep discounters, mass merchandisers, limited assortment stores, and e-commerce providers. The Company believes it has developed and implemented strategies and processes that allow it to be competitive in its Retail segment.segment by providing convenience, customer experience, and the assortment consumers demand. The Company monitors planned competitorcompetitive store openings and uses established proactive strategies to respond to new competition both before and after the competitive store opening.openings. Strategies to react to competition vary based on many factors, such as the competitor’s format, strengths, weaknesses, pricing and sales focus. During the past three fiscal years, 13seven competitor supercenters opened in geographic areas in which the Company currently operates corporate-ownedcorporate owned retail stores with twoand one additional openingsopening is expected to occur during fiscal 2016.2019. As a result of these openings, the Company believes the majority of its supermarkets compete with one or more supercenters. The Company has continued to respond to growing competition from online and non-traditional retailers by adding options and services such as online ordering, curbside pick-up, and home delivery.

Seasonality

In certain geographic areas, the Company’s sales and operating performance for each reportable segment varies with seasonality. Many northern Michigan stores are dependent on tourism, and therefore, are most affected by seasons and weather patterns, including, but not limited to, the amount and timing of snowfall during the winter months and the range of temperature during the summer months. TheAll fiscal quarters are 12 weeks, except for the Company’s first quarter, consists ofwhich is 16 weeks and will usuallygenerally include the Easter holiday while all other quarters consist of 12 weeks each with theholiday. The fourth quarter includingincludes the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. Fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 contained 53 weeks; therefore,holidays, and depending on the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 consisted of 13 weeks rather than 12 weeks. The transition fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 consisted of 39 weeks; therefore,end, may include the third and final quarter of the short year consisted of 15 weeks rather than 16 weeks.New Year’s holiday.

Suppliers

The Company purchases products from a large number of national, regional and local suppliers of name brand and private brand merchandise. The Company has not encountered any material difficulty in procuring or maintaining an adequate level of products to serve its customers. No single supplier accounts for more than 5% of the Company’s purchases. The Company continues to develop strategic relationships with key suppliers and believes this will prove valuable in the development of enhanced promotional programs and consumer value perceptions.

Intellectual Property

The Company owns valuable intellectual property, including trademarks, tradenames, and other proprietary information, some of which are of material importance to its business.

Technology

The Company’s information technology (“IT”) organization continues to integrateIn 2018, the Company focused on the continued standardization of its supply chain systems, fromenhancing the two merged companies. The plan is to consolidate onto a single set of systems. The integration has proceeded wellmanufacturing systems in its food processing operations and is approximately 60% complete. The integration will continue into fiscal 2017. During the last year there were additional projects completed which were unrelated to the integrationenhancement of the two companies.consumer digital presence in its corporate retail stores and technology solutions to support its growth with large customers. Additionally, there have been many projects to expand and update technologies in support of various business and operational needs, as detailed in the sections below.

Supply Chain. During fiscal 2015,2018, the Company continued to combine its Master Data Management systemscommenced an initiative to standardize customer, vendorthe order management system for the Food Distribution business, which included the areas of inventory management, distribution pricing and item information. The vendor portion is complete and the customer and item integration is still in process and will be completed in fiscal 2016.invoicing system. The Company completedalso began the consolidationinstallation of the procurementa new forecasting system and the standardization of the transportation maintenance management system in fiscal 2015. The Company completed 80% of its redesign and upgrade for the communications technology in support of the distribution center network. In the non-integration area, the Company completed a number of supply chain enhancement projects to support its Food Distribution business. The company also completed the implementation of the first phase of converting the Company’s independent customers to a new Business-to-Business technology.

Retail Systems. During fiscal 2015,The Company expanded e-commerce solutions through the Company substantially completed the standardizationcontinued growth of the legacy Nash-Finch retail locations with the Company’s standard point-of-sale (“POS”)Fast Lane, a curbside pick-up and delivery service available in store systems. The price modeling system was upgraded to support the addition of the legacy Nash-Finchits corporate owned retail stores. All locations feature curbside pickup and delivery is available in several markets. The Company also installed a new version of its loyalty systems in many of the remodeled legacy Nash-Finch retail locations. The Company continued with a multi-year customization effort for the major upgrade of its POS software. In the non-integration projects, the Company deployedreleased major upgrades to its consumer digital properties including kiosks, web sites and mobile applications.

Administrative Systems. During fiscal 2015,applications in 2018 and continued to enhance these systems throughout the Company completed the consolidation onto a single accounts payable system and its related workflow system. The first phase of a financial reporting and planning system was installed in fiscal 2015.year. The Company completed the consolidation ontoinstallation of a single internal web based communication and workflownew computer-assisted ordering system during fiscal 2015.for all stores in the Michigan region. This technology will be installed in all of the Company’s remaining retail locations in 2019. The Company is 90% complete withalso began a pilot program for a scan and bag application, which will enable customers to check out from their smart phone while they shop. Finally, the consolidation ontoCompany upgraded hardware to support Chip-and-PIN functionality in all retail fuel locations.

Manufacturing Systems. During 2018 the Company installed a single electronic data interface (“EDI”) system.manufacturing system in one of its food processing areas. The system installation in the remaining food processing area will be completed in 2019. The Company installed a quality control tracking system for use in its food processing and private brand operations which will supplement the Company’s food safety efforts.

Information Technology-9-


Administrative Systems and Infrastructure. The data center consolidation project (from fourcompany began the process of upgrading its financial systems and enhancing its human resource systems in 2018. The Company installed additional upgrades to its infrastructure in its primary and back up data centers to two data centers) began in fiscal 2015improve storage capacity, performance and is now 70% completeflexibility for disaster recovery and is expected to finish during the summer of fiscal 2016. In conjunction with this consolidation, the Company implemented major upgrades to its high performance processing and primary storage systems.non-stop processing.

-9-


Associates

As of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the Company employedemploys approximately 15,20014,000 associates, 8,500 of which are8,800 on a full-time basis and 6,700 of which are part-time.5,200 on a part-time basis. Approximately 1,300 associates, or 9%, of the total workforce, were represented by unions under collective bargaining agreements. The collective bargaining agreements thatcovering these associates will expire between April 20162019 and October 2017January 2022 or have been extended on their own terms and consisted primarilyhave a contemplated expiration date in February 2022. The Company successfully completed negotiations with union members of warehouse personnel and drivers at the Company’s Michigan, Ohio and Indianacollective bargaining agreement in the Lima distribution centers.center in early 2019. The Company considers its relations with its union and non-union associates to be good and havehas not had any material work stoppages in over twenty years.

Regulation

The Company is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the conduct of its business, including those pertaining to the workforce and the purchase, handling, sale and transportation of its products. SeveralMany of the Company’s products are subject to federal Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA) regulation. The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance, in all material respects, with the FDA, USDA and other federal, state and local laws and regulations governing its businesses.

Forward-Looking Statements

The matters discussed in this Item 1 include forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Available Information

TheSpartanNash’s web address of SpartanNash web site is www.spartannash.com. The inclusion of the Company’s websiteweb address in this Form 10-K does not include or incorporate by reference the information on or accessible through the Company’s website, and the information contained on or accessible through those websites should not be considered as part of this Form 10-K. The Company makes its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other reports (and amendments to those reports) filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 available on the Company’s web sitewebsite as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files or furnishes such materials with the SEC. Interested persons can view such materials without charge by clicking on “For Investors” and then “SEC Filings” on the Company’s web site.website. SpartanNash is a “large accelerated filer” within the meaning of Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

The Company faces many risks. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risk factors occur, the Company’s financial condition or results of operations may suffer, and the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline. This discussion of risk factors should be read in conjunction with the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All of these forward-looking statements are affected by the risk factors discussed in this item and this discussion of risk factors should be read in conjunction with the discussion of forward-looking statements, which appears at the beginning of this report.

Business and Operational Risks

The Company operates in an extremely competitive industry. Many of itsthe Company’s competitors are much larger than the Company and may be able to compete more effectively.

The Military segment faces competition from large national and regional food distributors as well as smaller distributors. Due to the narrow margins in the military food distribution industry, it is of critical importance for distributors to achieve economies of scale, which are typically a function of the density or concentration of military bases in the geographic area(s) a distributor serves and a distributor’s share of that geographic area. As a result, no single distributor in this industry, by itself, has a nationwide presence.

The Company’s Food Distribution and Retail segments compete with, among others,have many competitors, including regional and national grocery distributors, large chain stores that have integrated wholesale and retail operations, mass merchandisers, e-Commercee-commerce providers, deep discount retailers, limited assortment stores and wholesale membership clubs, manyclubs. The Company’s Military segment faces competition from large national and regional food distributors and smaller distributors. Many of whichthe Company’s competitors have greater resources than the Company. Some of the distribution and retail competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial resources and advantages than the Company, intensifying competition at the wholesale and retail levels.

-10--10-


The effects of industryIndustry consolidation, and the expansion of alternative store formats, nontraditional competitors and e-commerce have resulted in, and continuecontributed to result in, market share losses for traditional grocery stores. In addition,The Company’s Food Distribution, Military and Retail segments are primarily focused on traditional retail grocery trade, which faces competition from faster growing alternative retail channels, such as dollar stores, discount supermarket chains, Internet-based retailers and meal-delivery services. The Company expects these trends to continue. If the Company is facing increasing competition from nontraditional competitors and in alternative sales channels, including e-commerce. These trends have produced even stronger competition for the Company’s Retail business and for the independent customers of the Company’s Food Distribution business. To the extent the Company’s independent customers are acquired by one of the Company’s competitors or are not successful in competing with other retail chains and non-traditional competitors,these alternative channels, or growing sales by the Company’s Food Distributioninto such channels, its business will be affected. If the Company fails to implement strategies to respond effectively to these competitive pressures, its operatingor financial results couldmay be adversely affected by price reductions, decreased sales or margins, or loss of customer base.impacted.

This competition may result in reduced profit margins and other harmful effects on the Company and the Food Distribution customers that the Company supplies. Ongoing industry consolidation could result in loss of the Company’s existing customers and could confront its retail operations with competition from larger and better-capitalized chains in existing or new geographic areas. The Company may not be able to compete successfully in this environment.realize profitability from its Fresh Kitchen operations and may incur significant costs to support and onboard new business.

The Company’s businesses could be negatively affected if it fails to retain existing customers or attract a significant number of new customers.

Growing and increasing the profitabilityAs part of the Company’s distribution businesses is dependent in large measure upon its ability to retain existing customers2017 Caito Foods Service, Inc. (“Caito”) and capture additional distribution customers through its existing network of distribution centers, which enablesBlue Ribbon Transport, Inc. (“BRT”) acquisition, the Company to more effectively utilizeacquired a fresh cut and a new Fresh Kitchen facility that, at the fixed assets in those businesses. The Company’s ability to achieve these goals is dependent, in part, upon its ability to continue to provide a high leveltime of customer service, offer competitive products at low prices, maintain high levels of productivity and efficiency, particularlyacquisition, was in the process of integrating new customers into its distribution system,being constructed. The Fresh Kitchen had no history of operations, and offer marketing, merchandisingthe Company has experienced delays in achieving efficient levels of production volume and ancillary servicesrealizing the sales pipeline. The Company expects that provide valuethe Fresh Kitchen will not be profitable in the short-term, and there is no guarantee it will be profitable in the long-term. The Company continues to its independent customers.make investments of resources to support these businesses, which may result in significant ongoing operating expenses and may divert resources and management attention from other areas of the organization. If the Company fails to successfully integrate this business and develop new sales opportunities, it may not realize the benefits expected from the transaction and it may not perform to expectations.

The private brand program for U.S. military commissaries may not achieve the desired results.

In December 2016, the Defense Commissary Agency (“DeCA” or “the Agency”), which operates U.S. military commissaries worldwide, competitively awarded the Company the contract to support and supply products for the Agency’s private brand product program. Private brand products had not previously been offered in the Agency’s commissaries. Throughout the implementation and first two years of the program, the Company has invested and will continue to invest significant resources as it partners with DeCA to continue to expand the program, however there is no guarantee of its success. The Company expects that DeCA will face significant competition in each product category from national brands that are familiar to consumers. If the Agency is unable to execute these tasks effectively, itdrive traffic and business at the commissaries by offering one-stop shopping for military customers through a combination of both national and private brand offerings, then both DeCA and the Company may not be ableunable to attract a significant number of new customers, and attrition among its existing customer base could increase, either or both ofachieve expected returns from this program, which could have ana material adverse impacteffect on the Company’s revenue and profitability.

Growing and increasing the profitabilitybusiness. The success of the Company’s Retail business is dependent upon increasing its customer baseprogram will depend in the communities wherepart on factors beyond the Company’s corporate-owned retail stores are located. The Company plans to invest in redesigning somecontrol, including the actions of its corporate-owned retail stores into other formats in order to attract new customers. The Company’s results of operations may be adversely impacted if it is unable to attract a significant number of new retail customers.the Agency.

The Company may not be able to implement its strategy of growth through acquisitions or successfully integrate acquired businesses.

Part of the Company’s growth strategy involves selected acquisitions of additional distribution operations, and to a lesser extent, retail grocery stores, grocery store chainsstores. Given the recent consolidation activity and limited number of potential acquisition targets within the food industry, the Company may not be able to identify suitable targets for acquisition and may make acquisitions which do not achieve the desired level of profitability or distribution facilities. Becausesales. Additionally, because the Company operates in the Food Distribution business, future acquisitions of retail grocery stores could result in the Company competing with its independent grocery store customersretailers and could adversely affect existing business relationships with those customers. As a result, the Company may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates in the future, complete acquisitions or obtain the necessary financing. Accordingly,financing and this may adversely affect the Company’s ability to grow profitably. If the Company fails to successfully integrate business acquisitions and realize planned synergies, the business may not be ableperform to implement this part of its growth strategy or achieve expected results and long-term business goals as the success of its acquisitions will depend, in part, on whether the Company achieves the business synergies and anticipated cost savings in connection with these transactions and any future acquisitions.expectations.

Substantial operating losses may occur if the customers to whom the Company extends credit or for whom the Company guarantees loans or lease obligations fail to repay the Company.

In the ordinary course of business,From time to time, the Company extendsmay advance funds, extend credit including loans,and lend money to its Food Distribution customers,certain independent retailers and provides financial assistance to some customers by guaranteeing theirguarantee loan or lease obligations.obligations of certain customers. The Company also leases store sites for sublease to independent retailers. Generally, the Company’s loans and other financial accommodations are extended to small businesses that are unrelated and may have limited access to conventional financing. The Company also subleases retail properties and assigns retail property leases to third parties in the ordinary course of business. While the Company seeks to obtain security interest and other credit support in connection with these arrangements, but the financial accommodations the Company extends, such collateral may not be sufficient to cover itsthe Company’s exposure. Greater than expected losses from existing or future credit extensions, loans, guarantee commitments or sublease arrangements could negatively and potentially materially impact the Company’s operating results and financial condition.

-11--11-


Changes in relationships with the Company’s vendor base may adversely affect its business, margins, and profitability.

The Company sources the products it sells from a wide variety of vendors. The Company generally does not have long-term written contracts with its major suppliers that would require them to continue supplying it with merchandise. The Company depends on its vendors for among other things, appropriate allocation of merchandise, assortments of products, operation of vendor-focused shopping experiences within its stores, and funding for various forms of promotional allowances. There has been significant consolidation in the food industry, and this consolidation may continue to the Company’s commercial disadvantage. Such changes could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s revenues and profitability. The Company cooperatively engages in a variety of promotional programs with its vendors. The Company manages these programs to maintain or improve margins and increase sales. A reduction or change in promotional spending could have a significant impact on profitability.

The Company depends heavily on its ability to purchase merchandise in sufficient quantities at competitive prices. The Company has no assurances of continued supply, pricing, or access to new products and any vendor could at any time change the terms upon which it sells to the Company or discontinue selling to the Company. Vendor supplies can be adversely affected by weather, food contamination, regulatory actions, labor supply, strikes, labor unrest or product vendor defaults or disputes that limit the Company’s ability to procure products for sale to customers.

Disruptions to the Company’s information technology systems, including security breaches and cyber-attacks, could negatively affect the Company’s business.

The Company has large, complex ITinformation technology (“IT”) systems that are important to its business operations. It also employs mobile devices, social networking and other online activities to connect with customers, associates, suppliers, and business partners. The Company receives, transmits, and stores many types of sensitive information, including consumers’ personal information, information belonging to vendors, business partners, and other third parties, and the Company’s proprietary, confidential, or sensitive information. As a result, the Company faces risks of security breaches, system disruption, theft, espionage, inadvertent release of information, and other technology-related disruptions. The Company could incur significant losses due to disruptions in its systems and business if it were to experience difficulties accessing data stored in its IT systems.any such event.

The Company gathers and stores sensitive information, including personal information about its customers and associates as well as proprietary information of its customers and vendors. Although the Company has implemented security programs and disaster recovery facilities and procedures, cyber threats evolve rapidly and are becoming more sophisticated. Despite the Company’s efforts to secure its information and systems, cyber attackers may defeat the security could be compromisedmeasures and compromise the personal information of consumers, vendors, business partners, associates and other sensitive information. Associate error, faulty password management or other problems may compromise the security measures and result in a breach of the Company’s information systems, systems disruptions, data theft or other criminal activity could occur.activity. This could result in a loss of sales or profits or cause the Company to incur significant costs to restore its systems or to reimburse third parties for damages.

As a merchant that accepts debit and credit cards for payment, the Company is subject to the Payment Card Industry (“PCI”) Data Security Standard (“DSS”), issued by the PCI Council. PCI DSS contains compliance guidelines and standards with regard to the Company’s security involving the physical and electronic storage, processing and transmission of individual cardholder data. By accepting debit cards for payment, the Company is also subject to compliance with American National Standards Institute data encryption standards, and payment network security operating guidelines. Despite the Company’s compliance with these standards and other information security measures, the Company cannot be certain that all of its IT systems are able to prevent, contain or detect any cyber-attacks or security breaches from known malware or malware that may be developed in the future. To the extent that any disruption results in the loss, damage or misappropriation of information, the Company may be adversely affected by claims from customers, financial institutions, regulatory authorities, payment card associations and others. In addition, the cost of complying with stricter privacy and information security laws and standards could be significant to the Company.

Threats to security or the occurrence of severe weather conditions, natural disasters or health pandemicsother unforeseen events could harm the Company’s business.

The Company’s business could be severely impacted by wartime activities, threats or acts of terrorism, severe weather conditions, natural disasters, or widespread health pandemics. Any of theseother events that could affect the warehouse and transportation infrastructure used by both the Company and its vendors to supply the Company’s warehouses, corporate-ownedcorporate owned retail stores, and MilitaryFood Distribution and Food DistributionMilitary customers. While the Company believes it has adopted commercially reasonable precautions, insurance programs, and contingency plans; the damage or destruction of or substantial damage to,Company facilities could compromise its distribution centers and corporate-owned retail stores due to natural disaster, severe weather conditions, accident, terrorism, or other causes could substantially compromise the Company’s ability to distribute products orand generate sales at its corporate-owned retail stores. Additionally, unseasonably adverse climaticsales. Unseasonable weather conditions that impact growing conditions and the cropsavailability of food producers could also adversely affect the availability or cost of certain products. Any of the above events could result in a loss of sales, profits and asset value.values.

-12-


Impairment charges for goodwill or other intangiblelong-lived assets could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is required to perform an annual impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-livedother long-lived tangible and intangible assets in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if indicators are present or changes in circumstances suggest that impairment may exist. Testing goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment requires management to make significant estimates about the Company’s future performance, cash flows, and other assumptions that can be affected by potential changes in economic, industry or market conditions, business operations, competition, or – for goodwill – the Company’s stock price and market capitalization. Changes in these factors, or changes in actual performance compared with estimates of the Company’s future performance, may affect the fair value of goodwill or other intangible assets. This could result in the Company recording a non-cash impairment charge for the difference between the carrying value and implied fair value of the goodwill or other intangible assets in the period the determination of impairment is made. The Company cannot accurately predict the amount and timing of any impairment of assets. Should the value of goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

The CompanyIt may be difficult for the Company to attract and retain well-qualified associates, which would adversely affect the Company’s profitability and growth.

Recent low levels of unemployment have made it increasingly difficult to attract and retain qualified associates and have caused upward pressure on wages. If the Company is unable to successfully integrateattract and retain quality associates to meet its needs, the businesses of Spartan Stores and Nash-Finch and realize the anticipated benefits of the merger.

The merger involved the combination of two companies that formerly operated as independent public companies. The combined Company continuescould be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating the business practices and operations of Spartan Stores and Nash-Finch. The combined company may encounter complexities associated with managing the businesses of the combined company, in a seamless manner that minimizes adverse effectsincrease its compensation offering, reduce staffing below optimal levels, or rely more on customers, suppliers, associates and other constituencies. The Company’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address challenges related to the management and monitoring of the integrated operations of Nash-Finch and Spartan Stores and associated increased costs and complexity. There can be no assurances that the combined company will be successful or that it will realize the expected operating efficiencies, cost savings and other benefits currently anticipated from the merger.

The Company is expected to incur substantial expenses related to the continued integration of Spartan Stores and Nash-Finch.

The Company continues to incur substantial expenses in connection with the integration of Spartan Stores and Nash-Finch. There are a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that have been or will be integrated. The Company continues to maintain an administrative presence in Grand Rapids, Michigan; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Norfolk, Virginia. There are many factors beyond its control that could affect the total amount or the timing of the integration expenses. Many of the expenses that will be incurred are, by their nature, difficult to estimate accurately. These integration expenses may continue to result in the combined company taking charges against earnings and the amount and exact timing of such charges are somewhat uncertain.

Restrictive covenants imposed by the Company’s credit facility and other factorshigher-cost third-party providers, which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to borrow.

The Company’s ability to borrow additional funds is governed by the terms of its credit facilities. The credit facilities contain financialprofitability and other covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability to draw down the full amount of the facility, incur additional debt outside of the credit facility, create new liens on property, make acquisitions, or pay dividends. These covenants may affect the Company’s operating flexibility and may require it to seek the consent of the lenders to certain transactions that the Company may wish to effect. The Company is not currently restricted by these covenants. Disruptions in the financial markets have in the past resulted in bank failures. One or more of the participants in the credit facility could become unable to fund the Company’s future borrowings when needed. The Company believes that cash generated from operating activities and available borrowings under the credit facility will be sufficient to meet anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, dividend payments and debt service obligations for the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that the business will continue to generate cash flow at or above current levels or that the Company will maintain its ability to borrow under its credit facility. The Company may not be able to refinance its existing debt at similar terms.

Maintaining the Company’s reputation and corporate image is essential to the Company’s business success.

The Company’s success depends on the value and strength of its corporate name and reputation. The Company’s name, reputation and image are integral to its business as well as to the implementation of its strategies for expanding its business. The Company’s business prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected if its public image or reputation were to be tarnished by negative publicity including dissemination via print, broadcast or social media, or other forms of Internet-based communications. Adverse publicity about regulatory or legal action against the Company could damage its reputation and image, undermine its customers’ confidence and reduce long-term demand for its products and services, even if the regulatory or legal action is unfounded or not material to its operations. Any of these events could have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

-13-


The Company may be unable to retain its key management personnel.

growth. The Company’s success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of senior management. The loss of any key member of the Company’s management team may prevent it from implementing its business plans in a timely manner. The Company cannot assure that successors of comparable ability will be identified and appointed and that the Company’s business will not be adversely affected.

Market Risks-12-


The Company’s business is subject to risks from regional economic conditions, fuel prices, and other factors in its geographic areas.

The Company’s business is sensitive to changes in general economic conditions. In recent years, the United States has experienced volatility in the economy and financial markets due to uncertainties related to energy prices, availability of credit, difficulties in the banking and financial services sector, the decline in the housing market, diminished market liquidity, falling consumer confidence and high unemployment rates. These adverse economic conditions in its geographic areas, potential reduction in the populations in its geographic areas and the loss of purchasing power by residents in its geographic areas could reduce the amount and mix of groceries purchased, could cause consumers to trade down to less expensive mix of products or to trade down to discounters, all of which may affect the Company’s revenues and profitability.

Gasoline prices may affect consumer behavior and retail grocery prices. If petroleum prices rise in the future it may prompt consumers to make different choices in how and where they shop due to the high price of gasoline. Additionally, the impact of higher fuel costs is passed through by manufacturers and distributors in the prices of goods and services provided, again potentially affecting consumer buying decisions. This could have adverse impacts on retail store traffic, basket size and overall spending at both its corporate-owned and independent retail grocery stores.

In addition, many of the Company’s corporate-owned retail stores, as well as stores operated by its Food Distribution customers, are located in areas that are heavily dependent upon tourism. Unseasonable weather conditions and the economic conditions discussed above may decrease tourism activity and could result in decreased sales by the Company’s corporate-owned retail stores and decreased sales to stores operated by its Food Distribution customers, adversely affecting the Company’s revenues and profitability.

Economic downturns and uncertainty have adversely affected overall demand and intensified price competition, and have caused consumers to “trade down” by purchasing lower margin items and to make fewer purchases in traditional supermarket channels. Continued negative economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income such as employment levels, business conditions, changes in housing market conditions, increases in the cost of healthcare coverage, the availability of credit, interest rates, volatility in fuel and energy costs, food price inflation or deflation, employment trends in its geographic areas and labor costs, the impact of natural disasters or acts of terrorism, and other matters affecting consumer spending could cause consumers to continue shifting even more of their spending to lower-priced products and competitors. The continued general reductions in the level of discretionary spending or shifts in consumer discretionary spending to the Company’s competitors could adversely affect the Company’s growth and profitability.

Disruptions to worldwide financial and credit markets could potentially reduce the availability of liquidity and credit generally necessary to fund a continuation and expansion of global economic activity. A shortage of liquidity and credit in certain regions has the potential to lead to worldwide economic difficulties that could be prolonged. A general slowdown in the economic activity caused by an extended period of economic uncertainty could adversely affect the Company’s businesses. Difficult financial and economic conditions could also adversely affect its customers’ ability to meet the terms of sale or its suppliers’ ability to fully perform their commitments to the Company.

Macroeconomic and geopolitical events may adversely affect the Company’s customers, access to products, or lead to general cost increases which could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

The impact of events in foreign countries, which could result in increased political instability and social unrest, and the economic ramifications of significant budget deficits in the United States and changes in policy attributable to them at both the federal and state levels, could adversely affect the Company’s businesses and customers. Adverse economic or geopolitical events could potentially reduce the Company’s access to or increase prices associated with products sourced abroad. Such adverse events could lead to significant increases in the price of the products the Company procures, fuel and other supplies used in the Company’s business, utilities, or taxes that cannot be fully recovered through price increases. In addition, disposable consumer income could be affected by these events, which could have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

-14-


Inflation and deflation may adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

It is difficult to forecast whether fiscal 2016 will be a period of inflation or deflation. Food deflation could reduce sales growth and earnings, while food inflation, combined with reduced consumer spending, could reduce gross profit margins. If the Company experiences significant inflation or deflation, especially in the context of continued lower consumer spending, then the Company’s financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Legal, Regulatory and Legislative Risks

The Company’s Military segment operations areis dependent upon domestic and international military distribution.operations. A change in the military commissary system, including its supply chain, or a change in the level of governmental funding, could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Because the Company’s Military segment sells and distributes grocery products to military commissaries and exchanges in the United States and overseas, any material changes in the commissary system, the level of governmental funding to DeCA, military staffing levels, or the locations of bases, or DeCA’s supply chain may have a corresponding impact on the sales and operating performance of this segment. These changes could include privatization of some or all of the military commissary system, relocation or consolidation of commissaries and exchanges, base closings, troop redeployments or consolidations in the geographic areas containing commissaries and exchanges served by the Company, or a reduction in the number of persons having access to the commissaries and exchanges. Mandated reductions in the government expenditures, including those imposed as a result of a sequestration, may impact the level of funding to DeCA and could have a material impact on the Company’s operations.

Government regulation could harm the Company’s business.

The Company is subject If DeCA were to extensive governmental laws and regulations including, but not limited to, employment and wage laws and regulations, regulations governing the sale of pharmaceuticals, alcohol and tobacco, minimum wage requirements, working condition requirements, public accessibility requirements, citizenship requirements, environmental regulation, and other laws and regulations. A violation or change of these laws could have amake material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Like other companies that sell food and drugs, the Company’s corporate-owned retail stores are subject to various federal, state, local, and foreign laws, regulations, and administrative practices affecting its business. The Company must comply with numerous provisions regulating health and sanitation standards, facilities inspection, food labeling, and licensing for the sale of food, drugs, tobacco, and alcoholic beverages.

The Company cannot predict the nature of future laws, regulations, interpretations, or applications, or determine what effect either additional government regulations or administrative orders, when and if promulgated, or disparate federal, state, local, and foreign regulatory requirements will have on its future business. They could, however, require that the Company recall or discontinue sale of certain products, make substantial changes to its facilities or operations, or otherwise result in substantial increases in operating expense. Any or all of such requirements could have an adverse effect onsupply chain model, for example by limiting distribution authorization, then the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

The Company is subject to state and federal environmental regulations.

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, the Company may, as the owner or operator of its locations, be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of contamination at these current or former locations, whether or not the Company knew of, or were responsible for, the presences of such contamination. The failure to properly remediate such contamination may subject the Company to liability to third parties and may adversely affect its ability to sell or lease such property or to borrow money using such property as collateral.

Compliance with existing and future environmental laws regulating underground storage tanks may require significant capital expenditures and increased operating and maintenance costs.

The remediation costs and other costs required to clean up or treat contaminated sitesMilitary segment could be substantial. In the future, the Company may incur substantial expenditures for remediation of contamination that has not been discovered at existingaffected.

Product recalls or acquired locations. The Company cannot assure that it has identified all environmental liabilities at all of its current and former locations; that material environmental conditions not known to the Company do not exist; that future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose material environmental liability on the Company; or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of its locations. In addition, failure to comply with any environmental laws, ordinances or regulations or an increase in regulations could adversely affect the Company’s operating results and financial condition.

-15-


Changes in accounting standards could materially impact the Company’s results.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines, and interpretations for many aspects of the Company’s business, such as accounting for insurance and self-insurance, inventories, goodwill and intangible assets, store closures, leases, vendor and customer contracts, income taxes and share-based payments, are highly complex and involve subjective judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation could significantly change or add significant volatility to the Company’s reported earnings without a comparable underlying change in cash flow from operations.

Safetyother safety concerns regarding the Company’s products could harm the Company’s business.

The Company faces risks related to the safety of the food products that it manufactures, distributes, and sells. It is sometimes necessarymay need to recall such products for actual or alleged contamination, adulteration, mislabeling, or other safety concerns. The Company’s acquisition of Caito has expanded its food production capabilities and ability to offer fresh fruits and vegetables, fresh protein-based foods and complete meals. These products, and other food products that the Company sells, are at risk of contamination by disease-causing organisms such as Salmonella, E. coli, and others. These pathogens are generally found in nature, and as a result, there is a risk that they could be present in the products manufactured, distributed or sold by the Company. The Company typically has little control over proper food handling before the Company’s receipt of the product or once the product has been delivered to recall unsafe, contaminated or defective products.customers. Contamination risks may be controlled, although not eliminated, by good manufacturing practices and food safety programs. Recall costs can be materialmaterial. A widespread product recall could result in significant losses due to the administrative costs of a recall, the destruction of inventory, and lost sales. Recalls and other food safety concerns can also result in product liability claims, adverse publicity, damage to the Company might not be able to recover costs from its suppliers. Concerns regardingCompany’s reputation, and a loss of confidence in the safety and quality of food products sold by the Company could cause customers toits products. Customers may avoid purchasing certain products from the Company, or to seek alternative sources of supply for some or all of their food needs, even if the basis for concern is outside of the Company’s control. Any loss of confidence on the part of the Company’s customers would be difficult and costly to overcome. Any real or perceived issue regarding the safety of any food or drug items sold by the Company, regardless of the cause, could have a substantial and adverse effect on the Company’s business.

A number of the Company’s Food Distribution and Military segment associates are covered by collective bargaining agreements.agreements, and unions may attempt to organize additional associates.

Approximately 51%36% and 16%14% of the Company’s associates in its Food Distribution and Military business segments, respectively, are covered by collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) which expire between April 20162019 and October 2017.January 2022 or which the Company is in the process of negotiating and have a contemplated expiration date of February 2022. The Company expects that rising healthcare, pension and other employee benefit costs, among other issues, will continue to be important topics of negotiation with the labor unions. Upon the expiration of the Company’s collective bargaining agreements,CBAs, work stoppages by the affected workers could occur if the Company is unable to negotiate an acceptable contract with the labor unions. This could significantly disrupt the Company’s operations. Further, if the Company is unable to control healthcare and pension costs provided for in the collective bargaining agreements,CBAs, the Company may experience increased operating costs and an adverse impact on future results of operations.

Unions may attempt to organize additional associates.

While the Company believes that relations with its associates are good, the Company may continue to see additional union organizing campaigns. The potential for unionization could increase as any new related legislation or regulations are passed. The Company respects its associates’ right to unionize or not to unionize. However, the unionization of a significant portion of the Company’s workforce could increase the Company’s overall costs at the affected locations and adversely affect its flexibility to run its business in the most efficient manner to remain competitive or acquire new business and could adversely affect its results of operations by increasing its labor costs or otherwise restricting its ability to maximize the efficiency of its operations.

-13-


Costs related to multi-employer pension plans and other postretirement plans could increase.

The Company contributes to the Central States Southeast and Southwest Pension Fund (“Central(the “Central States Plan” or “the Plan”the “Plan”), a multi-employer pension plan, based on obligations arising from its collective bargaining agreementsCBAs with Teamsters locals 406 and 908. SpartanNash does not administer or control this Plan, and the Company has relatively little control over the level of contributions the Company is required to make. Currently, the Central States Plan is underfunded and in critical and declining status, and as a result, contributions are scheduled to increase. The Company expects that contributions to this Plan will be subject to further increases. Benefit levels and related issues will continue to create collective bargaining challenges. The amount of any increase or decrease in its required contributions to this Plan will depend upon the outcome of collective bargaining, the actions taken by the trustees who manage the Plan, governmental regulations, actual return on investment of Plan assets, the continued viability and contributions of other contributing employers, and the potential payment of withdrawal liability should the Company choose to exit a geographic area, among other factors.

Under current law, an employer that withdraws or partially withdraws from a multi-employer pension plan may incur a withdrawal liability to the plan if it is underfunded. The assessed withdrawal liability represents the portion of the plan’s underfunding that is allocable to the withdrawing employer under very complex actuarial and allocation rules. Withdrawal liability may be incurred under a variety of circumstances, including selling, closing or substantially reducing employment at a facility. Withdrawal liability could be material, and potential exposure to withdrawal liability may influence business decisions and could cause the Company to forgo business opportunities. The Company is currently unable to reasonably estimate such liability. On December 13, 2014, Congress passed the Multi-employer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (“MPRA”). The MPRA is intended to address funding shortfalls in both multi-employer pension plans and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. Because the MPRA is a complex piece of legislation, its effects on the Plan and potential implications for the Company are not known at this time. Any adjustment for withdrawal liability will be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably estimated.

-16-


On September 25, 2015, Central States submitted a Rescue Plan to the United States Department of Treasury (“Department of Treasury”) as permitted under the provisions of the MPRA relating to plans in “critical and declining status.” Under the Rescue Plan, Trustees seek to suspend the pension benefits of retirees and actives in order to save the pension plan from future financial failure. The proposed Rescue Plan is tiered and intended to equitably distribute benefit suspensions across three participant classes: orphans, participants and UPS transfer group. Under the MPRA, the Department of Treasury has 225 days in which to consider and act on the proposed Plan. Following the Department of Treasury’s review, Plan participants will be afforded the opportunity to consider and vote on the proposed benefit suspensions. Given the Department of Treasury’s review period and the amount of time necessary for a participant vote, Central States estimates that the proposed benefit suspensions, if approved, would not take effect until July 1, 2016. The Company is currently unable to reasonably estimate the potential impact of this Rescue Plan on its withdrawal liability.

The Companyalso maintains defined benefit retirement plans for certain of its associates that do not participate in multi-employer pension plans. These plans are frozen. Expenses associated with the defined benefit plans may significantly increase due to changes to actuarial assumptions or investment returns on plan assets that are less favorable than projected. In addition, changes in the Company’s funding status could adversely affect the Company’s financial position.

Costs related to associate healthcare benefits are expected to continue to increase.

The Company provides health benefits for a large number of associates. The Company’s costs to provide such benefits continue to increase annually and recent legislative initiatives regarding healthcare reform have had a direct financial impact. However, the Company has carefully analyzed the costs of compliance with these initiatives and believes it has mitigated much of the impact through plan design and vendor negotiations. The Company will continue to stay abreast of these legislative changes and monitor their impact. Future legislative changes could negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company participates in various multi-employer health plans for its union associates, and the Company is required to make contributions to these plans in amounts established under collective bargaining agreements. The cost of providing benefits through such plans has escalated rapidly in recent years. The amount of any increase or decrease in the Company’s required contributions to these multi-employer plans will depend upon many factors, many of which are beyond its control. If the Company is unable to control the costs of providing healthcare to associates, it may experience increased operating costs, which may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Risks associated with insurance plan claims could increase future expenses.

The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance to provide for potential liabilities for workers’ compensation, automobile and general liability, property insurance, director and officers’ liability insurance, and employee healthcare benefits. The liabilities that have been recorded for these claims represent the Company’s best estimate, using generally accepted actuarial reserving methods, of the ultimate obligations for reported claims plus those incurred but not reported for all claims incurred through January 2, 2016. Any actuarial projection of losses is subject to a high degree of variability. Changes in legal trends and interpretations, variability in inflation rates, changes in the nature and method of claims settlement, benefit level changes due to changes in applicable laws, and changes in discount rates could all affect the level of reserves required and could cause future expense to maintain reserves at appropriate levels.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

-14-


 

 

Item 2.Properties

The following table lists the locations and approximate square footage of the Company’s facilitiesdistribution centers used inby its Military and Food Distribution segments.and Military segments as of December 29, 2018. The lease expiration dates for the Military segment range from August 2016 to November 2029, and fordistribution centers primarily servicing the Food Distribution segment range from July 2016November 2019 to July 2020. Most ofFebruary 2021, and for the leases in the Food DistributionMilitary segment have additional renewal option periods available.range from October 2023 to November 2029. The Company believes that these facilities are generally well maintained are generallyand in good operating condition, have sufficient capacity, and are suitable and adequate to carry on its business for each of these segments.

-17-


Military Segment

 

 

Food Distribution Segment

 

 

 

Square Footage

 

 

 

 

Square Footage

 

Location

 

Leased

 

 

Owned

 

 

Total

 

 

Location

 

Leased

 

 

Owned

 

 

Total

 

Norfolk, Virginia

 

 

188,093

 

 

 

545,073

 

 

 

733,166

 

 

St. Cloud, Minnesota

 

 

 

 

 

329,046

 

 

 

329,046

 

Landover, Maryland

 

 

368,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

368,088

 

 

Fargo, North Dakota

 

 

10,400

 

 

 

288,824

 

 

 

299,224

 

Columbus, Georgia (1)

 

 

531,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

531,900

 

 

Minot, North Dakota

 

 

 

 

 

185,250

 

 

 

185,250

 

Pensacola, Florida

 

 

 

 

 

355,900

 

 

 

355,900

 

 

Omaha, Nebraska

 

 

4,384

 

 

 

686,783

 

 

 

691,167

 

Bloomington, Indiana

 

 

30,000

 

 

 

471,277

 

 

 

501,277

 

 

Sioux Falls, South Dakota

 

 

79,300

 

 

 

196,114

 

 

 

275,414

 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

 

 

 

 

 

608,543

 

 

 

608,543

 

 

Lumberton, North Carolina

 

 

386,129

 

 

 

 

 

 

386,129

 

San Antonio, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

461,544

 

 

 

461,544

 

 

Statesboro, Georgia

 

 

230,520

 

 

 

 

 

 

230,520

 

Total Square Footage

 

 

1,118,081

 

 

 

2,442,337

 

 

 

3,560,418

 

 

Bluefield, Virginia

 

 

 

 

 

187,531

 

 

 

187,531

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bellefontaine, Ohio

 

 

 

 

 

666,045

 

 

 

666,045

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lima, Ohio

 

 

 

 

 

517,552

 

 

 

517,552

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Westville, Indiana

 

 

 

 

 

631,944

 

 

 

631,944

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grand Rapids, Michigan

 

 

 

 

 

1,179,582

 

 

 

1,179,582

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Square Footage

 

 

710,733

 

 

 

4,868,671

 

 

 

5,579,404

 

Distribution Centers

 

 

 

Square Footage

 

Location

 

Leased

 

 

Owned

 

 

Total

 

Grand Rapids, Michigan (a)

 

 

77,000

 

 

 

1,179,582

 

 

 

1,256,582

 

Norfolk, Virginia (b)

 

 

188,093

 

 

 

545,073

 

 

 

733,166

 

Omaha, Nebraska (a)

 

 

4,384

 

 

 

686,783

 

 

 

691,167

 

Bellefontaine, Ohio (a)

 

 

 

 

 

666,045

 

 

 

666,045

 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (b)

 

 

 

 

 

608,543

 

 

 

608,543

 

Columbus, Georgia (c)

 

 

478,702

 

 

 

 

 

 

478,702

 

Lima, Ohio (a)

 

 

 

 

 

517,552

 

 

 

517,552

 

Bloomington, Indiana (b)

 

 

 

 

 

471,277

 

 

 

471,277

 

San Antonio, Texas (c)

 

 

 

 

 

461,544

 

 

 

461,544

 

St. Cloud, Minnesota (a)

 

 

40,319

 

 

 

329,046

 

 

 

369,365

 

Lumberton, North Carolina (a)

 

 

386,129

 

 

 

 

 

 

386,129

 

Landover, Maryland (b)

 

 

368,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

368,088

 

Pensacola, Florida (b)

 

 

 

 

 

355,900

 

 

 

355,900

 

Indianapolis, Indiana (a) (d)

 

 

 

 

 

273,078

 

 

 

273,078

 

Fargo, North Dakota (a)

 

 

 

 

 

288,824

 

 

 

288,824

 

Sioux Falls, South Dakota (a)

 

 

79,300

 

 

 

196,114

 

 

 

275,414

 

Bluefield, Virginia (a)

 

 

 

 

 

187,531

 

 

 

187,531

 

Minot, North Dakota (a)

 

 

 

 

 

185,250

 

 

 

185,250

 

Lakeland, Florida (a)

 

 

 

 

 

42,125

 

 

 

42,125

 

Total Square Footage

 

 

1,622,015

 

 

 

6,994,267

 

 

 

8,616,282

 

(1) (a)

LocationDistribution center services the Food Distribution segment.

(b)

Distribution center services the Military segment.

(c)

Distribution center services both the Food Distribution and Military segments. Based on utilization estimates at December 29, 2018, the Food Distribution segment utilizes 36,000 square feet and 33,365 square feet at the San Antonio and Columbus distribution centers, respectively. Also, the Columbus location requires periodic lease payments to the holder of the outstanding industrial revenue bond, which is held by the Company. Upon expiration of the lease terms, the Company will take title to the property upon redemption of the bond.

(d)

Distribution center includes vertically-integrated food processing operations at this location, including the Company’s Fresh Kitchen.

-15-


 

The following table lists the Company’s retail stores, including the adjacent fuel centers of the related stores, by retail banner, number of stores, geographic regionlocation and approximate square footage under each banner.

banner as of December 29, 2018.

Retail Segment

 

 

 

 

 

Leased

 

 

Owned

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

Number

 

Square

 

 

Number

 

 

Square

 

 

Number

 

Square

 

Grocery Store Retail Banner

 

Geographic Region

 

of Stores

 

Feet

 

 

of Stores

 

 

Feet

 

 

of Stores

 

Feet

 

Family Fare Supermarkets

 

Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota

 

69

 

 

2,844,777

 

 

6

 

 

 

281,455

 

 

75

 

 

3,126,232

 

VG’s Food and Pharmacy

 

Michigan

 

10

 

 

461,698

 

 

1

 

 

 

37,223

 

 

11

 

 

498,921

 

D&W Fresh Markets

 

Michigan

 

9

 

 

435,153

 

 

2

 

 

 

84,458

 

 

11

 

 

519,611

 

Sun Mart

 

Colorado, Minnesota, Nebraska

 

2

 

 

55,333

 

 

8

 

 

 

238,100

 

 

10

 

 

293,433

 

No Frills

 

Iowa, Nebraska

 

9

 

 

426,881

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

426,881

 

Econofoods

 

Minnesota, Wisconsin

 

4

 

 

137,533

 

 

4

 

 

 

94,749

 

 

8

 

 

232,282

 

Dan's Super Market

 

North Dakota

 

6

 

 

278,477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

278,477

 

Valu Land

 

Michigan

 

6

 

 

135,920

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

135,920

 

Bag ‘N Save

 

Nebraska

 

5

 

 

308,908

 

 

1

 

 

 

92,381

 

 

6

 

 

401,289

 

Family Fresh Market

 

Minnesota, Nebraska, Wisconsin

 

1

 

 

32,650

 

 

5

 

 

 

249,904

 

 

6

 

 

282,554

 

Family Thrift Center

 

South Dakota

 

3

 

 

127,107

 

 

1

 

 

 

60,200

 

 

4

 

 

187,307

 

Supermercado Nuestra Familia

 

Nebraska

 

1

 

 

23,211

 

 

2

 

 

 

83,279

 

 

3

 

 

106,490

 

Forest Hills Foods

 

Michigan

 

1

 

 

50,791

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

50,791

 

Pick ‘n Save

 

Ohio

 

1

 

 

45,608

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

45,608

 

Germantown Fresh Market

 

Ohio

 

1

 

 

31,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

31,764

 

Prairie Market

 

South Dakota

 

1

 

 

32,528

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

32,528

 

Dillonvale IGA

 

Ohio

 

1

 

 

25,627

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

25,627

 

Madison Fresh Market

 

Wisconsin

 

1

 

 

21,470

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

21,470

 

Purdue Fresh Market

 

Indiana

 

1

 

 

21,622

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

21,622

 

Wholesale Food Outlet

 

Iowa

 

1

 

 

19,620

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

19,620

 

Total

 

 

 

133

 

 

5,516,678

 

 

30

 

 

 

1,221,749

 

 

163

 

 

6,738,427

 

Retail Segment

 

 

 

 

 

Leased

 

 

Owned

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

Number

 

Square

 

 

Number

 

 

Square

 

 

Number

 

Square

 

Grocery Store Retail Banner

 

Location(s)

 

of Stores

 

Feet

 

 

of Stores

 

 

Feet

 

 

of Stores

 

Feet

 

Family Fare Supermarkets

 

Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa

 

76

 

 

3,256,655

 

 

10

 

 

 

511,424

 

 

86

 

 

3,768,079

 

D&W Fresh Market

 

Michigan

 

9

 

 

440,178

 

 

2

 

 

 

84,458

 

 

11

 

 

524,636

 

VG’s Grocery

 

Michigan

 

8

 

 

363,117

 

 

1

 

 

 

37,223

 

 

9

 

 

400,340

 

Family Fresh Market

 

Minnesota, Nebraska, Wisconsin

 

1

 

 

32,650

 

 

5

 

 

 

247,223

 

 

6

 

 

279,873

 

Dan's Supermarket

 

North Dakota

 

5

 

 

264,077

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

264,077

 

Econofoods

 

Minnesota, Wisconsin

 

1

 

 

23,500

 

 

1

 

 

 

16,563

 

 

2

 

 

40,063

 

Sun Mart Foods

 

Minnesota, Nebraska

 

1

 

 

31,733

 

 

4

 

 

 

93,824

 

 

5

 

 

125,557

 

Valu Land

 

Michigan

 

5

 

 

112,908

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

112,908

 

Supermercado Nuestra Familia

 

Nebraska

 

1

 

 

22,540

 

 

2

 

 

 

83,279

 

 

3

 

 

105,819

 

No Frills Supermarkets

 

Iowa, Nebraska

 

3

 

 

61,060

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

61,060

 

Forest Hills Foods

 

Michigan

 

1

 

 

50,791

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

50,791

 

Pick ‘n Save

 

Ohio

 

1

 

 

45,608

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

45,608

 

Dillonvale IGA

 

Ohio

 

1

 

 

25,627

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

25,627

 

Fresh City Market

 

Wisconsin

 

1

 

 

21,470

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

21,470

 

Total

 

 

 

114

 

 

4,751,914

 

 

25

 

 

 

1,073,994

 

 

139

 

 

5,825,908

 

The Company also owns two additionalone fuel centerscenter that areis not reflected in the retail square footage above: a Family Fare Quick Stop in Michigan that is not included atwith a supermarket locationcorporate owned retail store but is adjacent to itsthe Company’s corporate headquarters and Sun Mart Express Gas in Fergus Falls, Minnesota.headquarters. Also not reflected in the retail square footage above areis one stand-alone pharmaciespharmacy located in Cannon Falls, Minnesota; Clear Lake, Iowa;Iowa. On December 31, 2018, the Company acquired Martin’s, which is a chain of 21 stores located in Indiana and Barron, Wisconsin.Michigan totaling 1.3 million square feet, of which 0.8 million is leased.

The Company’s service centers are located in Grand Rapids, Michigan; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Norfolk, Virginia; and Indianapolis, Indiana; consisting of office space of approximately 286,100275,851 square feet in Company-owned buildings and 26,30033,000 square feet in leased facilities. The Company also leases two additional off-site storage facilities consisting of approximately 50,300 square feet. The Company owns and leases to independent retailers seven stores totaling approximately 370,000 square feet and owns and leases to third parties one warehouse of approximately 400,000 square feet and office space totaling 89,000 square feet.

-18-


Item 3.   Legal Proceedings

TheFrom time-to-time, the Company is engaged from time-to-time in routine legal proceedings incidental to its business. The Company does not believe that these routine legal proceedings, taken as a whole, will have a material impact on its business or financial condition. Additionally, various lawsuits and claims, arising in the ordinary course of business, are pending or have been asserted against the Company. While the ultimate effect of such actions, lawsuits and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that their outcome will not result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operating results or liquidity.

Various lawsuits and claims, arising in the ordinary course of business, are pending or have been asserted against the Company. While the ultimate effect of such lawsuits and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that their outcome will not result in an adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operating results or liquidity. Legal proceedings, various lawsuits, claims, and other matters are more fully described in Note 89, Commitments and Contingencies, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, in Item 8 of this report; this informationwhich is herein incorporated herein by reference.reference.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosure

Not ApplicableApplicable.

-19-


PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

SpartanNash common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the trading symbol “SPTN.”

Stock sale prices are based on transactions reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Information on quarterly high and low sales prices for SpartanNash common stock for each of the last two fiscal years is as follows:

-16-


 

 

Year Ended January 2, 2016

 

 

Full Year

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

1st Quarter

 

 

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(16 Weeks)

 

Common stock price - High

$

 

33.89

 

 

$

 

28.94

 

 

$

 

33.84

 

 

$

 

33.89

 

 

$

 

32.73

 

Common stock price - Low

 

 

20.99

 

 

 

 

20.99

 

 

 

 

24.85

 

 

 

 

30.11

 

 

 

 

24.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended January 3, 2015

 

 

Full Year

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

1st Quarter

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(13 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(16 Weeks)

 

Common stock price - High

$

 

26.89

 

 

$

 

26.89

 

 

$

 

22.50

 

 

$

 

24.68

 

 

$

 

25.74

 

Common stock price - Low

 

 

19.16

 

 

 

 

19.88

 

 

 

 

19.16

 

 

 

 

19.44

 

 

 

 

21.00

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

Full Year

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

1st Quarter

 

 

 

 

 

52 Weeks

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(16 Weeks)

 

Common stock price – High

 

 

 

$

 

27.37

 

 

$

 

21.82

 

 

$

 

26.18

 

 

$

 

26.85

 

 

$

 

27.37

 

Common stock price – Low

 

 

 

 

 

16.32

 

 

 

 

16.32

 

 

 

 

18.91

 

 

 

 

17.05

 

 

 

 

16.55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

Full Year

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

1st Quarter

 

 

 

 

 

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(16 Weeks)

 

Common stock price – High

 

 

 

$

 

40.33

 

 

$

 

26.99

 

 

$

 

27.74

 

 

$

 

37.80

 

 

$

 

40.33

 

Common stock price – Low

 

 

 

 

 

19.85

 

 

 

 

19.85

 

 

 

 

23.26

 

 

 

 

25.08

 

 

 

 

31.54

 

At February 26, 2016,25, 2019, there were approximately 1,3401,300 shareholders of record of SpartanNash common stock. The Company has paid a quarterly cash dividend every quarter since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006.

The table below outlines quarterly dividends paid on Spartan Stores and SpartanNash common stock in each of the last three fiscal years as well as the Board of Directors’ currently anticipated quarterly dividend:years:

 

Dividend per

 

Effective Quarter

common share

 

1st1st through 4th quarters Fiscal December 28, 2013

0.09

1st through 4th quarters Fiscal January 3, 2015

0.12

1st through 4th quarters Fiscal January 2,of 2016

 

 

0.135$

0.150

 

1st quarter Fiscal December 31, 20161st through 4th quarters of 2017

 

 

0.15

0.165

1st through 4th quarters of 2018

0.180

 

 

Under its senior revolving credit facility, the Company is generally permitted to pay dividends in any fiscal year up to an amount such that all cash dividends, together with any cash distributions prepayments of the senior notes and share repurchases, do not exceed $25.0$35.0 million. Additionally, the Company is generally permitted to pay cash dividends and repurchase shares in excess of $25.0$35.0 million in any fiscal year so long as its Excess Availability, as defined in the senior revolving credit facility, is in excess of 10% of the Total Borrowing Base, as defined in the senior revolving credit facility, before and after giving effect to the prepayments, repurchases and dividends.

Although the Company expects to continue to pay a quarterly cash dividend, adoption of a dividend policy does not commit the Board of Directors (the “Board”) to declare future dividends. Each future dividend will be considered and declared by the Board of Directors at its discretion. Whether the Board of Directors continues to declare dividends and repurchase shares depends on a number of factors, including the Company’s future financial condition, anticipated profitability and cash flows, and compliance with the terms of its credit facilities.  In May 2011,During the Boardfirst quarter of Directors2016, the Board authorized a five-year share repurchase program for up to $50 million of SpartanNash’s common stock. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Board authorized an incremental $50 million share repurchase program expiring in 2022. As of December 29, 2018, $45.0 million remains available to be repurchased.

During the fiscal years ended January 2,2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015, the Company repurchased 282,363952,108, 1,367,432, and 245,956396,030 shares of common stock for approximately $9.0$20.0 million, $35.0 million, and $5.0$9.0 million, respectively. The Company did not repurchase any shares under this program during the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013. The approximate dollar valuefourth quarter of shares that may yet to be purchased under the repurchase plan was $12.3 million as of January 2, 2016.2018.

The equity compensation plans table in Part III, Item 12 of this report is hereherein incorporated by reference.

There were no purchases of the Company’s own common stock during the last quarter of the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016.

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder return on SpartanNash common stock to that of the Russell 2000 Total Return Index and the NASDAQ Retail Trade Index, over a period beginning March 26, 2011December 28, 2013 and ending on January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018.

-20-


Cumulative total return is measured by the sum of (1) the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and (2) the difference between the share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period, divided by the share price at the beginning of the measurement period.

-17-


The dollar values for total shareholder return plotted above are shown in the table below:

March 26,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 30,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

January 2,

 

December 28,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

January 2,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 29,

 

2011

 

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

 

2013

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

2013

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

SpartanNash

$

 

100.00

 

 

$

 

122.17

 

 

$

 

120.70

 

 

$

 

165.32

 

 

$

 

183.74

 

 

$

 

157.25

 

$

 

100.00

 

 

$

 

111.14

 

 

$

 

95.12

 

 

$

 

177.20

 

 

$

 

122.50

 

 

$

 

80.38

 

Russell 2000 Total Return Index

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

102.25

 

 

 

118.92

 

 

 

146.54

 

 

 

153.32

 

 

 

147.27

 

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

104.62

 

 

 

100.49

 

 

 

121.91

 

 

 

139.76

 

 

 

123.38

 

NASDAQ Retail Trade

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

130.49

 

 

 

141.80

 

 

 

168.88

 

 

 

188.74

 

 

 

198.20

 

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

111.11

 

 

 

116.16

 

 

 

117.49

 

 

 

124.98

 

 

 

124.47

 

 

The information set forth under the Heading “Performance Graph” shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically requests that such information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates it by reference into a filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

-21--18-


 

 

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

The following table provides selected historical consolidated financial information of SpartanNash for each of the five fiscal years and periods ended March 31, 2012January 3, 2015 through January 2, 2016. For comparability purposes,December 29, 2018, all of which were 52-week years with the Company has also provided selected historical consolidated financial information for the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013.exception of 2014 which was a 53-week year.

 

Year Ended

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales (a)

$

 

8,064,552

 

 

$

 

7,963,799

 

 

$

 

7,561,084

 

 

$

 

7,527,695

 

 

$

 

7,805,931

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,110,406

 

 

 

 

1,144,909

 

 

 

 

1,111,494

 

 

 

 

1,115,682

 

 

 

 

1,156,074

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (b)

 

 

997,411

 

 

 

 

1,015,024

 

 

 

 

963,235

 

 

 

 

975,833

 

 

 

 

1,020,000

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

4,937

 

 

 

 

8,101

 

 

 

 

6,959

 

 

 

 

8,433

 

 

 

 

12,675

 

Restructuring, goodwill/asset impairment and other charges (c)

 

 

37,546

 

 

 

 

228,459

 

 

 

 

32,116

 

 

 

 

8,802

 

 

 

 

6,166

 

Operating earnings (loss)

 

 

70,512

 

 

 

 

(106,675

)

 

 

 

109,184

 

 

 

 

122,614

 

 

 

 

117,233

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

 

40,698

 

 

 

 

(131,644

)

 

 

 

89,963

 

 

 

 

100,259

 

 

 

 

90,449

 

Income tax expense (benefit) (d)

 

 

6,907

 

 

 

 

(79,027

)

 

 

 

32,907

 

 

 

 

37,093

 

 

 

 

31,329

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

33,791

 

 

 

 

(52,617

)

 

 

 

57,056

 

 

 

 

63,166

 

 

 

 

59,120

 

Net earnings (loss)

$

 

33,572

 

 

$

 

(52,845

)

 

$

 

56,828

 

 

$

 

62,710

 

 

$

 

58,596

 

Diluted earnings (loss) from continuing operations per share

 

 

0.94

 

 

 

 

(1.41

)

 

 

 

1.52

 

 

 

 

1.67

 

 

 

 

1.57

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

 

0.93

 

 

 

 

(1.41

)

 

 

 

1.51

 

 

 

 

1.66

 

 

 

 

1.55

 

Cash dividends declared per share

 

 

0.72

 

 

 

 

0.66

 

 

 

 

0.60

 

 

 

 

0.54

 

 

 

 

0.48

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets (e)

$

 

1,971,912

 

 

$

 

2,055,797

 

 

$

 

1,930,336

 

 

$

 

1,917,263

 

 

$

 

1,923,455

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

579,060

 

 

 

 

600,240

 

 

 

 

559,722

 

 

 

 

583,698

 

 

 

 

597,150

 

Working capital (f)

 

 

524,645

 

 

 

 

509,705

 

 

 

 

387,507

 

 

 

 

396,263

 

 

 

 

455,694

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations (e) (f)

 

 

679,797

 

 

 

 

740,755

 

 

 

 

413,675

 

 

 

 

467,793

 

 

 

 

541,683

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

715,947

 

 

 

 

721,950

 

 

 

 

825,407

 

 

 

 

790,779

 

 

 

 

747,253

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Period Ended

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

January 2,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

March 30,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2013

 

 

2013 (A)

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(51 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

 

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

Statements of Earnings Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

$

 

7,651,973

 

 

$

 

7,916,062

 

 

$

 

3,190,039

 

 

$

 

2,597,230

 

 

$

 

2,608,160

 

 

$

 

2,634,226

 

Cost of sales

 

 

6,536,291

 

 

 

 

6,759,988

 

 

 

 

2,570,516

 

 

 

 

2,110,350

 

 

 

 

2,062,616

 

 

 

 

2,078,116

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,115,682

 

 

 

 

1,156,074

 

 

 

 

619,523

 

 

 

 

486,880

 

 

 

 

545,544

 

 

 

 

556,110

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

975,572

 

 

 

 

1,022,387

 

 

 

 

546,100

 

 

 

 

433,450

 

 

 

 

482,987

 

 

 

 

489,650

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

8,433

 

 

 

 

12,675

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment (B)

 

 

8,802

 

 

 

 

6,166

 

 

 

 

16,877

 

 

 

 

15,644

 

 

 

 

1,589

 

 

 

 

(23

)

Operating earnings

 

 

122,875

 

 

 

 

114,846

 

 

 

 

35,553

 

 

 

 

16,793

 

 

 

 

60,968

 

 

 

 

66,483

 

Interest expense

 

 

21,820

 

 

 

 

24,414

 

 

 

 

12,209

 

 

 

 

9,219

 

 

 

 

13,410

 

 

 

 

15,037

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

1,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,289

 

 

 

 

5,527

 

 

 

 

5,047

 

 

 

 

 

Other, net

 

 

(375

)

 

 

 

(17

)

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

 

(23

)

 

 

 

(756

)

 

 

 

(110

)

Earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

 

100,259

 

 

 

 

90,449

 

 

 

 

15,082

 

 

 

 

2,070

 

 

 

 

43,267

 

 

 

 

51,556

 

Income taxes

 

 

37,093

 

 

 

 

31,329

 

 

 

 

5,914

 

 

 

 

841

 

 

 

 

15,425

 

 

 

 

19,686

 

Earnings from continuing operations

 

 

63,166

 

 

 

 

59,120

 

 

 

 

9,168

 

 

 

 

1,229

 

 

 

 

27,842

 

 

 

 

31,870

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes (C)

 

 

(456

)

 

 

 

(524

)

 

 

 

(725

)

 

 

 

(488

)

 

 

 

(432

)

 

 

 

(112

)

Net earnings

$

 

62,710

 

 

$

 

58,596

 

 

$

 

8,443

 

 

$

 

741

 

 

$

 

27,410

 

 

$

 

31,758

 

Basic earnings from continuing operations per share

$

 

1.68

 

 

$

 

1.57

 

 

$

 

0.39

 

 

$

 

0.05

 

 

$

 

1.28

 

 

$

 

1.40

 

Diluted earnings from continuing operations per share

 

 

1.67

 

 

 

 

1.57

 

 

 

 

0.39

 

 

 

 

0.05

 

 

 

 

1.27

 

 

 

 

1.39

 

Basic earnings per share

 

 

1.67

 

 

 

 

1.56

 

 

 

 

0.36

 

 

 

 

0.03

 

 

 

 

1.26

 

 

 

 

1.39

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

 

1.66

 

 

 

 

1.55

 

 

 

 

0.36

 

 

 

 

0.03

 

 

 

 

1.25

 

 

 

 

1.39

 

Cash dividends declared per share

 

 

0.54

 

 

 

 

0.48

 

 

 

 

0.35

 

 

 

 

0.27

 

 

 

 

0.32

 

 

 

 

0.26

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets (D)

$

 

1,925,448

 

 

$

 

1,932,282

 

 

$

 

1,983,651

 

 

$

 

1,983,651

 

 

$

 

787,357

 

 

$

 

761,891

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

583,698

 

 

 

 

597,150

 

 

 

 

628,482

 

 

 

 

628,482

 

 

 

 

272,126

 

 

 

 

256,776

 

Working capital (D)

 

 

396,263

 

 

 

 

455,694

 

 

 

 

418,076

 

 

 

 

418,076

 

 

 

 

10,869

 

 

 

 

23,102

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

475,978

 

 

 

 

550,510

 

 

 

 

598,319

 

 

 

 

598,319

 

 

 

 

145,876

 

 

 

 

133,565

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

790,779

 

 

 

 

747,253

 

 

 

 

706,873

 

 

 

 

706,873

 

 

 

 

335,655

 

 

 

 

323,608

 

(A)  (a)

See Note 2Due to consolidated financial statements regarding the mergeradoption of ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Nash-Finch.Customers – Topic 606” in January 2018, the Company determined that certain contracts in the Food Distribution segment that were historically reported on a gross basis are now required to be reported on a net basis. The adoption of the guidance using the full retrospective method resulted in decreases to net sales and cost of sales previously reported of $164,283, $173,516, $124,278, and $110,131 for 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

(B)  (b)

See Note 4Due to consolidated financial statements.the adoption of ASU 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits” in January 2018, benefit costs other than service cost, are reflected in Other, net, whereas they previously were recognized in Selling, general and administrative expenses. Retrospective application resulted in an increase to Other, net and a decrease in Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2014 of $2,387 from amounts previously reported. The reclassifications were not material in any of the other periods presented.

(C)  (c)

See Note 1In 2018, the Company recorded $37.5 million of net restructuring, asset impairment and other charges associated with a $32.0 million non-cash charge related to consolidated financial statements.the expected insolvency of a food distribution customer and other charges related to the Company’s retail store rationalization plan. In 2017, the Company recorded a $189.0 million goodwill impairment charge related to its Retail segment and $33.7 million of asset impairment charges primarily associated with long-lived assets in the Retail segment. In 2016, the Company recorded $32.1 million of restructuring and asset impairment charges primarily related to the closure of four retail stores and two distribution centers, as well as asset impairment charges associated with certain underperforming retail stores.

(D)  (d)

See Note 1In 2017, income taxes were impacted by the revaluation of deferred tax liabilities related to consolidated financial statements. the corporate tax rate reduction enacted in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which also impacted the Company’s tax rate in 2018.

  (e)

Due to the retrospective adoption of ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Deferred Taxes,” deferred income taxesInterest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” in 2016, debt issuance costs were reclassified from CurrentOther assets, and Current liabilitiesnet to Long-term liabilities for all periods presented. This resulted in a decrease in Total assets and Long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $2,310$8,185 and $1,582$8,827 at March 30, 2013January 2, 2016 and March 31, 2012,January 3, 2015, respectively. Additionally,

  (f)

Due to the adoption of ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” in 2015, deferred income taxes were reclassified from Current liabilities to Long-term liabilities for all periods presented. Adoption of this standard resulted in an increase (decrease) in Working capital of $22,494; $19,909; $(2,310); and $(1,582)$22,494 at January 3, 2015; December 28, 2013; March 30, 2013; and March 31, 2012; respectively.2015.

-19-


Historical data is not necessarily indicative of the Company’s future results of operations or financial condition. See discussion of “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this report; “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this report; and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

-22-


Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

About SpartanNash

SpartanNash, is headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and is a leading multi-regional grocery distributor and grocery retailer and the largest distributor, by revenue, ofwhose core businesses include distributing grocery products to a diverse group of independent and chain retailers, its corporate owned retail stores, and military commissaries and exchanges in the United States. The Company operates three reportable business segments: Military, Food Distribution, Military and Retail.

On November 19, 2013, Spartan Stores, Inc. (“Spartan Stores”) mergedThe Company’s Food Distribution segment provides a wide variety of nationally branded and private brand grocery products and perishable food products to approximately 2,100 independent retailers, the Company’s corporate owned retail stores, food service distributors and various other customers. Through its Food Distribution segment, the Company also services national retailers, including Dollar General. Sales to Dollar General are made to more than 15,500 of its retail locations. Combined with Nash-Finchthe Military segment, the Company (“Nash-Finch”). Undercurrently services customers in all 50 states. The Company processes fresh-cut fruits and vegetables and other value-added meal solutions and supplies these products to grocery retailers and food service distributors. Through the termsFresh Kitchen facility, the Company processes, cooks and packages fresh protein-based foods and complete meal solutions for a number of the merger agreement, each share of Nash-Finch common stock was converted into 1.2 shares of Spartan Stores common stock. The results of operations of Nash-Finch are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of merger. Following the merger, Nash-Finch Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of SpartanNash. different customers.

The Company’s Military segment contracts with manufacturers to distribute a wide variety of grocery products, including dry groceries, beverages, meat, and frozen foods, primarily to military commissaries and exchanges located in the United States, the District of Columbia, Europe, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Honduras, Bahrain, Djibouti and Egypt. The Company is also the DeCA exclusive worldwide supplier of private brand grocery and related products to U.S. military commissaries. The Company has over 40 years of experience acting as a distributor to U.S. military commissaries and exchanges.

The Company’s Food DistributionRetail segment provides a wide variety of nationally branded and private label grocery products and perishable food products to approximately 2,100 independentoperated 139 corporate owned retail locations and 163 corporate-owned retail stores. The Food Distribution segment currently conducts business in 47 states, primarilystores in the Midwest Great Lakes, and Southeast regions of the United States.

The Company’s Retail segment operates 163 supermarkets in the Midwest and Great Lakesregion primarily under the banners of Family Fare Supermarkets, Family Fresh Markets, D&W Fresh Markets, VG’s Grocery, Dan’s Supermarketand Sun MartFamily Fresh Market. as of December 29, 2018. The Company offersalso offered pharmacy services in 9182 of its supermarketscorporate owned stores (of which 72 pharmacies are owned) and also operatesoperated 29 fuel centers. The retail supermarketsstores have a “neighborhood market” focusstrategy that focuses on value beyond price, affordable wellness, and commitment to distinguish them from supercenters and limited assortment stores.local products.

The Company’s fiscal year end is the last Saturday closest to December 31. The following discussion is as of and for the end of December, which was changed from the last Saturday in March beginning with the transition yearfiscal years ending or ended December 28, 2013. The Company’s fiscal years ended January 2,2019 (“2019”), December 29, 2018 ("2018" or “current year”), December 30, 2017 (“2017” or “prior year”) and December 31, 2016 and January 3, 2015 consisted(“2016”), all of which include 52 and 53 weeks, respectively. The transition fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 consisted of 39 weeks. Under the December fiscal year format, allAll fiscal quarters are 12 weeks, except for the Company’s first quarter, which is 16 weeks and will generally include the Easter holiday. The fourth quarter includes the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. Fiscal 2014 was comprised of 53 weeksholidays, and as a result,depending on the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 consisted of 13 weeks.year end, may include the New Year’s holiday.

In certain geographic areas, the Company’s sales and operating performance may vary with seasonality. Many stores are dependent on tourism, and therefore, are most affected by seasons and weather patterns, including, but not limited to, the amount and timing of snowfall during the winter months and the range of temperature during the summer months. In the Michigan geographic area, the Company’s first and second quarters are typically its lowest sales quarters. Therefore, operating results are generally lower during these two quarters.

Overview of 20152018

In 2015,2018, the Company continuedexecuted against its long-term strategic objective of becoming a growth company that is focused on developing a national, highly efficient distribution platform known for solving unique and complex logistical issues and evolving its primary retail brand to execute on its strategy to invest in its Retail business, expand its consumer-centric merchandising and marketing programs, and lay the groundwork for new business opportunitiesdeliver innovative solutions, both of which service a diverse customer base. The Company also began a company-wide initiative late in the Food Distribution and Military segments. The Company continuedfourth quarter to benefit from merger integration and improved operational efficiencies in its distribution network and retail operations. Despite the challenging operating environment, the Company delivered against its initiatives, strengthening its foundation and core competencies, and positioning the Company for continued earnings growth in 2016 and beyond.drive sustainable profit improvements.

Fiscal 2015 accomplishments and highlights include:

·

The Company entered into an agreement with the largest locally owned and operated grocer in the Western Wisconsin area, Gordy’s Market (“Gordy’s”), to become its primary wholesale grocery supplier. The Company’s distribution center is strategically located to deliver quality products, minimize food miles, and provide exceptional customer service. The agreement with Gordy’s reinforces the value that independent customers see in the Company’s private brand offerings, value-added services and ability to help them grow and optimize their businesses. The Company will be servicing Gordy's as its primary distributor by May 2016.

-23-


·

The Company continued to integrate its supply chain organization to further optimize the network, increase asset utilization and leverage programs to drive more value for its shareholders, retailers and customers. The Company closed its Junction City distribution center, which was underutilized and not strategically located to service a broader network of military bases; and transferred all of its existing business to the Company’s Oklahoma City facility. The Company expects to continue to benefit from ongoing supply chain optimization efforts in 2016 in both its Food Distribution and Military channels.

·

Continued integrating the Company’s Military and Food Distribution transportation fleets. Although still in the beginning stages, the Company is encouraged by the potential economies of scale that can be achieved through reduced empty miles and improved efficiencies.

·

The Company meaningfully outperformed industry trends in the Military segment despite decreased commissary sales and DeCA’s year-over-year sales decline due to the strength of new business sales. The Company expects to continue to see positive momentum in 2016 from its new business pipeline.

·

The Company expanded its private brand program and experienced good growth in its natural and organic Full Circle brand and plans to further emphasize this brand in 2016 as the consumer appetite for organic products continues to increase.

·

Acquired six stores from Dan’s Super Market, Inc. (Dan’s), a six-store chain serving Bismarck and Mandan, North Dakota, to strengthen the Company’s offering in this region from both a retail and distribution perspective.

·

Continued to invest in the western retail store base by: a) completing six major remodels and re-banners to Family Fare in the Omaha area; b) expanding the yes Rewards program to certain Family Fare and Family Fresh Markets stores in the western geographic areas, including the newly-remodeled Omaha stores; and c) offering fuel programs for the Western geographic areas by partnering with third party fuel centers. The Company plans to remodel and re-banner eight retail stores to Family Fare in the western geographic area in fiscal 2016.

·

The Company completed one major remodel and several other retail upgrades in Michigan, and plans to complete five major remodels in this geographic area in fiscal 2016.

·

Long-term debt, including capital lease obligations and current maturities, decreased $75.3 million from $570.3 million at January 3, 2015 to $495.0 million as of January 2, 2016 primarily due to the redemption of the Company’s $50.0 million 6.625% Senior Notes. As a result of the redemption, the Company expects to reduce ongoing annual interest expense by approximately $2.0 million, assuming no future interest rate increases. The Company also amended its Revolving Credit Facility to reduce interest rates and extend its maturity.

·

The Company benefited from ongoing merger integration and cost reduction initiatives, which improved operational efficiencies and allowed the Company to finish the fiscal year with earnings from continuing operations of $1.67 per diluted share, representing an increase from the prior year of $0.10 per diluted share.

Fiscal 2016 Outlook

Initiatives for fiscal 2016 include:

·

In the Military segment, the Company is currently piloting the distribution of fresh products to commissaries, and is encouraged by the initial results of the test phase and the potential opportunity to secure new business.

·

The Company expects to continue to benefit from the ongoing supply chain optimization efforts in the Food Distribution and Military channelsand expects to see enhanced product freshness and selection in its facilities, as well as improved efficiency.

·

The Company is also focused on reducing inventory shrink across its warehouses and expects this to be a major efficiency initiative in 2016.

·

In its Retail business, the Company will continue to invest capital and plans to remodel and re-banner to Family Fare eight stores primarily in the Omaha area.

·

In connection with the remodeling and re-bannering efforts, the Company will continue the rollout of its loyalty program to these retail stores and looks to further develop its marketing program to improve targeting and customer segmentation to improve the overall customer experience.

·

The Company will continue to proactively pursue strategic and opportunistic acquisitions that fit the Company’s growth strategy to make the best use of the Company’s capital and increase shareholder returns.

The Company believes that it has built a strong foundation that will be supplemented by targeted investments to support yet another year of earnings growth.

The matters discussed in this Item 7 include forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” which appears at the beginning of this report and “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

-24--20-


 

 

The Company’s 2018 accomplishments and developments include:

Food Distribution

During 2018, the Company expanded its supply chain capabilities to provide better solutions to its customers more efficiently and in more markets. The Company enhanced its ability to make deliveries to the east coast and added a centralized produce distribution solution to its western region. The addition of the produce distribution solution will result in higher quality products while incurring fewer costs related to transportation and waste. The Company eliminated redundancy in its network, while shifting certain operations closer to its customers in an effort to reduce freight miles and provide faster fulfillment. The Company also invested in its labor force, including drivers and warehousemen, fleet, and IT systems in order to provide for further efficiency and execution within the supply chain going forward.

The Company was recognized in the current year for its innovation in marketing and merchandising. These efforts have led to the launch of various product and marketing campaigns which have supported the sales trends in the traditional distribution business. At the same time, the Company remains committed to collaboration with independent retailers and launched programs to strengthen these partnerships and to support their success in the retail market. These programs included solutions ranging from e-commerce to customer loyalty and retention programs.

The Company realized sales growth in its Food Distribution segment, due to incremental distribution volume from both existing and new customer programs, of 4.3% over the prior year. Sales growth in the fourth quarter of 2018 marked the 12th consecutive quarter of organic sales growth for the segment. The Company remains focused on partnering with independent retailers to support their operations and enhance the consumer experience.

Within the food processing operations, the Company has seen year-over-year progress related to its efforts to improve efficiency and an expansion of its fresh offerings as a result of interest from new types of customers. The Company expects further progress in its profitability as it becomes more experienced at seamlessly onboarding new business opportunities and is able to continue to develop an experienced workforce. The Company also consolidated the produce planning and replenishment processes between food processing and other Food Distribution operations and continues to look for opportunities to drive leverage and synergies through process consolidation and technology.

Military

The Military segment continued to support DeCA in the expansion of its private brand program, which has contributed to overall sales growth in 2018. In connection with the overall arrangement, the Company leveraged its private brand capabilities and expertise to help design and develop both DeCA’s proprietary and commissary-specific private brands. As of December 29, 2018, the Company had launched over 700 SKUs of private brand products in the DeCA system. The Company looks forward to continuing its partnership with DeCA and anticipates 1,000 total SKUs will be active within the program by the end of 2019.

The Company was dedicated to their support of military commissaries which were significantly impacted by Hurricane Florence during the third quarter of 2018. The Company responded to urgent requests of DeCA and made additional deliveries of water to these commissaries.

In the third quarter of 2018, the Company secured a significant contract for incremental business with an existing customer through the continued demonstration of superior customer service and execution capabilities. Incremental sales with this customer commenced in the fourth quarter of 2018 which, combined with continued increases in volume from the private brand program, offset the challenges of operating in a commissary environment which continues to experience negative sales trends.

Retail

The Company continued to make strategic Retail segment investments through the execution of five store remodels during 2018. These investments have supported the Company’s objectives related to brand repositioning and it expects that they will help improve customer satisfaction and contribute to the achievement of sequential growth in fiscal 2019 comparable store sales. The Company also continued its store rationalization program, and in connection with overall business strategies, closed six retail stores in connection with lease expirations and store rationalization plans during the year.

The Company expanded Fast Lane, its e-commerce solution, which offers online ordering and curbside pick-up service at approximately 65 retail stores, and same day delivery in several geographies as of December 29, 2018. The Company believes Fast Lane is essential to increasing customer satisfaction through quality service and convenience. Additional enhancements were made to Fast Lane in the current year which integrate “yes”™ digital coupons into the shopping experience and provide customers with additional savings and rewards. In the second quarter of 2018, the Company also began partnerships with Instacart in several regions to offer customers additional online shopping options. Lastly, in the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company developed and piloted a new mobile application which allows customers to scan and bag their groceries as they shop helping them to save time and money.

-21-


Other

During 2018, the Company returned $45.9 million to shareholders from share repurchases and dividend payments. The Company also improved working capital compared to the prior year. Net cash provided by operating activities was $171.7 million in 2018 compared to $52.8 million in 2017. Net cash used by investing activities was $64.2 million in 2018 compared to $315.4 million in 2017. Net long-term debt decreased $54.8 million compared to the prior year as the Company continues to work towards paying down debt.

In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company partnered with a third-party advisory firm to commence a company-wide initiative, Project One Team, designed to transform its culture and empower associates at all levels to drive substantial ongoing, sustainable improvements to business processes and results. Project One Team is designed to align with the Company’s strategic objectives and is intended to position the Company to identify opportunities for growth and efficiency with benefits in the next one to two years.

During 2018, the Company remained committed to undertaking business development initiatives within both core and adjacent spaces to further its strategic objectives. In line with this strategy, the Company acquired Martin’s Super Markets (“Martin’s”) in early 2019. Martin’s is a leading Midwest independent supermarket chain which operates 21 stores in the northern Indiana and southwestern Michigan markets.

The accomplishments above helped position the Company for future earnings growth, but the competitive landscape and industry trends also present challenges to the Company and potential changes in trends that could impact 2019. For fiscal 2019, the Company anticipates year-over-year sales growth to continue in the Food Distribution segment driven primarily by incremental sales to existing customers and new food processing customers. Incremental business with an existing customer and contributions from the ongoing expansion of the DeCA private brand program should continue to drive sales growth in the Military segment. The Company expects sequential improvement in its Retail stores’ comparable sales trend, benefiting from current year and future store remodels and the Company’s brand repositioning. The Company plans to mitigate these challenges by sustaining sales growth in the Food Distribution segment, aggressively pursuing new business made available by disruption in the industry and driving adjusted operating earnings and adjusted EBITDA growth over the prior year. Additionally, the Company plans to strengthen its management team and improve supply chain capabilities, from identifying and capitalizing on freight efficiencies, to managing through tight labor markets in certain geographies, while increasing the acceptance of private brand products. The Company also plans to deliver value through the execution on Project One Team. The Company will reduce its debt levels and financial leverage ratios to facilitate achieving our strategic objectives. The Company continues to take actions that it believes will enhance the convenience and value that it provides its customers and continues to see positive results from these investments.

Results of Operations

Certain prior year amounts have been adjusted to reflect recently adopted accounting standards.

The following table sets forth items from the Company’s consolidated statements of earningsoperations as a percentage of net sales and the year-to-year percentage change in dollar amounts:from the preceding year:

 

 

 

Percentage of Net Sales

 

 

Percentage Change

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net sales

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

5.3

 

Gross profit

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

14.4

 

 

 

14.7

 

 

 

(3.0

)

 

 

3.0

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

12.4

 

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

5.4

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(39.1

)

 

 

16.4

 

Restructuring, goodwill/asset impairment and other charges

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(83.6

)

 

 

611.4

 

Operating earnings (loss)

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

166.1

 

 

 

(197.7

)

Other income and expenses

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

19.4

 

 

 

29.9

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

130.9

 

 

 

(246.3

)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

108.7

 

 

 

(340.2

)

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

164.2

 

 

 

(192.2

)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

163.5

 

 

 

(193.0

)

Note: Certain totals do not sum due to rounding.

-22-


 

Results of Continuing Operations for 2018 Compared to 2017

Net Sales

 

Percentage of Net Sales

 

 

Percentage Change

 

 

January 2,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

1/2/2016 to

 

 

1/3/2015 to

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2013

 

 

2013

 

 

1/3/2015

 

 

12/28/2013

 

 

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(51 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

 

52 vs. 53

 

 

53 vs. 51

 

Net sales

 

100.0

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

148.1

 

Gross profit

 

14.6

 

 

 

14.6

 

 

 

19.4

 

 

 

18.7

 

 

 

(3.5

)

 

 

86.6

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

*

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

(33.5

)

 

 

(39.6

)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

12.8

 

*

 

12.9

 

 

 

17.1

 

 

 

16.7

 

 

 

(4.6

)

 

 

87.2

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

42.8

 

 

 

(63.5

)

Operating earnings

 

1.6

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

7.0

 

 

 

223.0

 

Other income and expenses

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.4

 

*

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.5

 

*

 

(7.3

)

 

 

19.2

 

Earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

1.3

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

10.8

 

 

 

499.7

 

Income taxes

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

*

 

18.4

 

 

 

429.7

 

Earnings from continuing operations

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.8

 

 

 

544.9

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13.0

)

 

 

(27.7

)

Net earnings

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.0

 

 

 

594.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*     Difference due to rounding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

Net Sales

 

2017

 

 

Net Sales

 

Variance

 

 

Change

 

Food Distribution

$

 

3,991,450

 

 

 

49.5

 

%

 

$

 

3,827,909

 

 

 

48.1

 

%

 

$

 

163,541

 

 

 

4.3

 

Military

 

 

2,166,843

 

 

 

26.9

 

 

 

 

 

2,144,022

 

 

 

26.9

 

 

 

 

 

22,821

 

 

 

1.1

 

Retail

 

 

1,906,259

 

 

 

23.6

 

 

 

 

 

1,991,868

 

 

 

25.0

 

 

 

 

 

(85,609

)

 

 

(4.3

)

Total net sales

$

 

8,064,552

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

$

 

7,963,799

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

$

 

100,753

 

 

 

1.3

 

Net sales increased $100.8 million, or 1.3%, to $8.06 billion in 2018 from $7.96 billion in 2017. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to organic growth in the Food Distribution segment and new business in the Military segment, which more than offset lower sales in the Retail segment and lower comparable sales at DeCA operated locations in the Military segment.

Food Distribution net sales, after intercompany eliminations, increased $163.5 million, or 4.3%, to $3.99 billion in 2018 from $3.83 billion in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to sales growth from new and ongoing programs with existing customers.

Military net sales increased $22.8 million, or 1.1%, to $2.17 billion in 2018 from $2.14 billion in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to new commissary business in the Southwest, incremental volume from the private brand program and a new program with an existing customer, partially offset by lower comparable sales at the DeCA operated locations.

Retail net sales decreased $85.6 million, or 4.3%, to $1.91 billion in 2018 from $1.99 billion in the prior year. The decrease in net sales was primarily attributable to lower sales resulting from the closures and sales of retail stores and fuel centers of $64.0 million, as well as negative comparable store sales, partly offset by an increase in fuel prices. Comparable store sales, excluding fuel, were negative 2.0% in the current year and reflect continued strong competition within the industry. The Company defines a retail store as comparable when it is in operation for 14 accounting periods (a period equals four weeks), regardless of remodels, expansions, or relocated stores. The Company’s definition of comparable store sales may differ from similarly titled measures at other companies.

Gross Profit Gross profit represents net sales less cost of sales, which is described in further detail within Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Gross profit decreased $34.5 million, or 3.0%, to $1.11 billion in 2018 compared to $1.14 billion in the prior year. As a percent of net sales, gross profit decreased from 14.4% to 13.8% due to several factors, most notably the increased mix of Food Distribution and Military segment sales as a percentage of total sales combined with a change in customer mix within the Food Distribution segment and higher fees paid to pharmacy benefit managers in the Retail segment. The rate was also impacted by operational issuesat one of the Company’s distribution centers, serving both the military and food distribution segments, the voluntary product recall on certain fresh cut products and an increase in LIFO expense due to higher inflation.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages, employee benefits, warehousing costs, store occupancy costs, shipping and handling, utilities, equipment rental, depreciation (to the extent not included in Cost of Sales), out-bound freight and other administrative expenses. SG&A expenses decreased $17.6 million, or 1.7%, to $997.4 million in 2018 from $1,015.0 million in the prior year. As a percent of net sales, SG&A expenses decreased from 12.7% to 12.4% due to the mix of business operations and decreased administrative costs, partially offset by the impact of increased transportation costs within the Military and Food Distribution segments.

Merger/Acquisition and Integration Expenses In 2018, $4.9 million of merger/acquisition and integration expenses were incurred mainly associated with ongoing merger activities from prior years as well as costs associated with the Martin’s acquisition. Prior year results included $8.1 million of merger/acquisition and integration expenses primarily associated with the Caito and BRT acquisition, and to a lesser extent, other acquisition-related and ongoing merger activities related to the Nash-Finch merger.

Restructuring, Asset Impairment and Other Charges, Including Goodwill Impairment In 2018, $37.5 million of net restructuring, asset impairment and other charges were incurred, predominantly associated with a non-cash charge related to the collectability of a customer advance to an independent retailer of $32.0 million as well as charges incurred as part of the Company’s retail store rationalization plans, partially offset by changes in estimates of closed store liabilities and gains on sales of real estate. Prior year results included $228.5 million of restructuring, asset impairment and other charges that consisted primarily of non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $189.0 million related to the Retail segment and $39.4 million of restructuring and asset impairment charges primarily associated with the underlying performance of Company’s retail store base and the execution of its store rationalization program.

-23-


Operating Earnings (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

Net Sales

 

2017

 

 

Net Sales

 

Variance

 

 

Net Sales

 

Food Distribution

$

 

48,752

 

 

 

1.2

 

%

 

$

 

83,115

 

 

 

2.2

 

%

 

$

 

(34,363

)

 

 

(1.0

)

Military

 

 

5,647

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

6,969

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

(1,322

)

 

 

 

Retail

 

 

16,113

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

(196,759

)

 

 

(9.9

)

 

 

 

 

212,872

 

 

 

10.7

 

Operating earnings (loss)

$

 

70,512

 

 

 

0.9

 

%

 

$

 

(106,675

)

 

 

(1.3

)

%

 

$

 

177,187

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

The Company reported operating earnings of $70.5 million in 2018 compared to an operating loss of $106.7 million in the prior year. The increase of $177.2 million was primarily attributable to prior year non-cash goodwill and asset impairment charges, predominantly related to the Retail segment. The increase was also attributable to higher sales volumes and lower administrative costs, partially offset by the charge associated with the customer advance, a decrease in gross profit rates, and increases in warehousing and transportation costs.

Food Distribution operating earnings decreased $34.4 million, or 41.3%, to $48.8 million in 2018 from $83.1 million in the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to the charge on the customer advance, the voluntary product recall, higher transportation costs associated with the roll-out of a significant new customer program and higher LIFO expense, partially offset by higher sales volume and lower healthcare and administrative costs.

Military operating earnings decreased $1.3 million, or 18.9%, to $5.6 million in 2018 from $7.0 million in the prior year. The decrease was attributable to higher transportation costs, operational issuesat one distribution center and higher LIFO expense, partially offset by lower administrative costs, lower integration costs, higher sales volume and the gain on the sale of real estate.

Retail operating earnings increased $212.9 million to $16.1 million in 2018 compared to an operating loss of $196.8 million in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to goodwill and asset impairment charges in the prior year. Other significant factors include lower health care and other benefits and the closure of underperforming stores, partially offset by lower comparable store sales, higher fees paid to pharmacy benefit managers, as well as acquisition and integration expenses related to the Martin’s acquisition.

Interest Expense Interest expense increased $5.1 million, or 20.3%, to $30.5 million in 2018 from $25.3 million in the prior year primarily due to an increase in interest rates compared to the prior year.

Income Taxes – The Company’s effective income tax rates were 17.0% and 60.0% for 2018 and 2017, respectively. Differences from the federal statutory rate in the current year are primarily due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for an uncertain tax position and tax credits, partially offset by tax expense related to stock-based compensation and state income taxes. Differences from the federal statutory rate in the prior year were primarily due to the re-measurement of deferred taxes, state taxes, tax benefits related to stock-based compensation and charitable product donations. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company re-measured its deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect a change in the federal statutory rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018, resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), enacted on December 22, 2017. As a result, the Company realized an income tax benefit of $26.0 million related to 2017. Refer to Note 13, Income Tax, within the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Tax Act.

Results of Continuing Operations for 2017 Compared to 2016

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

(In thousands)

2017

 

 

Net Sales

 

2016

 

 

Net Sales

 

Variance

 

 

Change

 

Food Distribution

$

 

3,827,909

 

 

 

48.1

 

%

 

$

 

3,281,025

 

 

 

43.4

 

%

 

$

 

546,884

 

 

 

16.7

 

Military

 

 

2,144,022

 

 

 

26.9

 

 

 

 

 

2,197,014

 

 

 

29.1

 

 

 

 

 

(52,992

)

 

 

(2.4

)

Retail

 

 

1,991,868

 

 

 

25.0

 

 

 

 

 

2,083,045

 

 

 

27.5

 

 

 

 

 

(91,177

)

 

 

(4.4

)

Total net sales

$

 

7,963,799

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

$

 

7,561,084

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

$

 

402,715

 

 

 

5.3

 

Net sales increased $402.7 million, or 5.3%, to $7.96 billion in 2017 from $7.56 billion in 2016. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to contributions from the Caito acquisition, organic growth of 4.1% in the Food Distribution segment, new military commissary business in the Southwest in the second half of the year and increased contributions from the DeCA private brand program, partly offset by lower comparable sales at DeCA operated locations and lower sales in the Retail segment resulting from the closure and sale of retail stores and a decrease in comparable store sales.

-24-


Food Distribution net sales, after intercompany eliminations, increased $546.9 million, or 16.7%, to $3.83 billion in 2017 from $3.28 billion in 2016. The increase was primarily due to contributions from the Caito acquisition and organic growth of 3.7% related to incremental sales volume to existing customers.

Military net sales decreased $53.0 million, or 2.4%, to $2.14 billion in 2017 from $2.20 billion in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales at the DeCA operated locations, partially offset by new business in the Southwest and contributions from the DeCA private brand program.

Retail net sales decreased $91.2 million, or 4.4%, to $1.99 billion in 2017 from $2.08 billion in 2016. The decrease in net sales was primarily attributable to $60.8 million of lower sales resulting from the closures and sales of retail stores as well as negative comparable store sales, partially offset by the impact of higher fuel prices. Comparable store sales for the year, excluding fuel, were negative 2.4%.

Gross Profit – Gross profit increased $33.4 million, or 3.0%, to $1.14 billion in 2017 compared to $1.11 billion in 2016. As a percent of net sales, gross profit decreased from 14.7% to 14.4% due to several factors, most notably the increased mix of Food Distribution sales as a percentage of total sales. The rate was also impacted by margin investments at both Retail and Food Distribution, the cycling of a significant 2016 LIFO benefit and lower fuel margins, partially offset by higher margin rates in the Military segment.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses – SG&A expenses increased $51.8 million, or 5.4%, to $1,015.0 million in 2017 from $963.2 million in 2016, representing 12.7% of net sales in both years. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily attributable to higher operational expenses related to the Caito acquisition, increased healthcare costs and higher transportation and occupancy costs, partially offset by lower incentive compensation and other cost savings.

Merger/Acquisition and Integration Expenses – In 2017, $8.1 million of merger/acquisition and integration expenses were incurred mainly associated with the Caito and BRT acquisition, and to a lesser extent, other acquisition-related and ongoing merger activities. The Company’s 2016 results included $7.0 million of merger/acquisition and integration expenses primarily associated with the Nash-Finch merger, particularly system upgrades and implementations, as well as costs incurred in connection with 2016 and 2015 acquisitions.

Restructuring, Asset Impairment and Other Charges, Including Goodwill Impairment – In 2017, $228.5 million of net restructuring, asset impairment and other charges were incurred, predominantly associated with goodwill and asset impairment charges. The Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $189.0 million related to the Retail segment. The impairment was driven by significantly lower than expected Retail operating results due to an increasingly competitive retail environment and the related pricing pressures that are anticipated to negatively impact gross margin, operating profit, and future cash flows. The Company also recorded $39.4 million of restructuring and asset impairment and restructuring charges primarily associated with the underlying performance of Company’s retail store base and the execution of its store rationalization program. The Company’s 2016 results included $32.1 million of restructuring and asset impairment charges that consisted primarily of impairment charges related to four underperforming retail stores and restructuring charges primarily related to three retail stores and two food distribution centers. The facilities were closed as part of the Company’s retail store and warehouse rationalization plan.

Operating (Loss) Earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

(In thousands)

2017

 

 

Net Sales

 

2016

 

 

Net Sales

 

Variance

 

 

Net Sales

 

Food Distribution

$

 

83,115

 

 

 

2.2

 

%

 

$

 

85,296

 

 

 

2.6

 

%

 

$

 

(2,181

)

 

 

(0.4

)

Military

 

 

6,969

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

12,216

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

(5,247

)

 

 

(0.3

)

Retail

 

 

(196,759

)

 

 

(9.9

)

 

 

 

 

11,672

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

(208,431

)

 

 

(10.5

)

Operating (loss) earnings

$

 

(106,675

)

 

 

(1.3

)

%

 

$

 

109,184

 

 

 

1.4

 

%

 

$

 

(215,859

)

 

 

(2.7

)

The Company reported an operating loss of $106.7 million in 2017 compared to operating earnings of $109.2 million in 2016. The decrease of $215.9 million was primarily attributable to 2017 non-cash goodwill and restructuring and asset impairment charges of $228.5 million, predominantly related to the Retail segment, higher costs associated with Caito operations and Fresh Kitchen start-up activities, as well as increased LIFO and health care expenses, partly offset by lower incentive compensation expense and various cost savings initiatives.

Food Distribution operating earnings decreased $2.2 million, or 2.6%, to $83.1 million in 2017 from $85.3 million in 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to Caito operations and Fresh Kitchen start-up activities and higher LIFO expense, partially offset by net sales growth from new and existing customers, lower incentive compensation and lower operating expenses associated with various cost savings initiatives.

-25-


Military operating earnings decreased $5.3 million, or 43.0%, to $7.0 million in 2017 from $12.2 million in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales at the DeCA-operated commissaries, higher supply chain costs associated with industry-wide transportation cost challenges, onboarding and ramping up new and high-growth lines of business and increased healthcare and LIFO expense, partially offset by growth from the new military commissary business in the Southwest and the DeCA private brand program, as well as lower incentive compensation and margin improvements.

Retail reported an operating loss of ($196.8) million in 2017 compared to operating earnings of $11.7 million in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to goodwill and higher asset impairment charges, lower comparable store sales, investments in margin and store labor, and higher occupancy and healthcare costs, partly offset by lower costs related to incentive compensation, depreciation, merger/acquisition and integration and closed stores.

Interest Expense – Interest expense increased $6.2 million, or 32.8%, to $25.3 million in 2017 from $19.1 million in 2016 primarily due to increased borrowings related to the Caito and BRT acquisition and the timing of working capital requirements.

Debt Extinguishment – A loss on debt extinguishment of $0.4 million was incurred in 2017 in connection with the pay down of the term loan component of the senior secured credit facility. A loss on debt extinguishment of $0.2 million was incurred in 2016 in connection with the amendment of the senior secured credit facility.

Income Taxes – The Company’s effective income tax rates were 60.0% and 36.6% for 2017 and 2016, respectively. Differences from the federal statutory rate are primarily due to the re-measurement of deferred taxes mentioned previously, state taxes, tax benefits related to stock-based compensation and charitable product donations in the current year and state taxes in 2016.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to reporting financial results in accordance with GAAP, the Company also provides information regarding adjusted operating earnings, adjusted earnings from continuing operations, and adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“adjusted EBITDA”). These are non-GAAP financial measures, as defined below, and are used by management to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance. The Company believes these measures provide useful information for both management and its investors. The Company believes these non-GAAP measures are useful to investors because they provide additional understanding of the trends and special circumstances that affect its business. These measures provide useful supplemental information that helps investors to establish a basis for expected performance and the ability to evaluate actual results against that expectation. The measures, when considered in connection with GAAP results, can be used to assess the overall performance of the Company as well as assess the Company’s performance against its peers. These measures are also used as a basis for certain compensation programs sponsored by the Company. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with the Company request its financial results in these adjusted formats.

Current year adjusted operating earnings, adjusted earnings from continuing operations, and adjusted EBITDA exclude start-up costs associated with the new Fresh Kitchen operation through the start-up period, which concluded during the first quarter. The Fresh Kitchen is a newly constructed facility that provides the Company with the ability to process, cook, and package fresh protein-based foods and complete meal solutions. Given the Fresh Kitchen represents a new line of business for the Company, the start-up activities associated with testing, training, and preparing the Fresh Kitchen for production, as well as incorporating the related operations into the business, are considered “non-operational” or “non-core” in nature. The 2017 retirement stock compensation award represents incremental compensation expense in connection with an executive retirement that is also considered “non-operational” or “non-core” in nature.

Adjusted Operating Earnings

Adjusted operating earnings is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that the Company defines as operating earnings (loss) plus or minus adjustments for items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of the Company and costs associated with the closing of operational locations.

The Company believes that adjusted operating earnings provide a meaningful representation of its operating performance for the Company as a whole and for its operating segments. The Company considers adjusted operating earnings as an additional way to measure operating performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted operating earnings is meant to reflect the ongoing operating performance of all of its distribution and retail operations; consequently, it excludes the impact of items that could be considered “non-operating” or “non-core” in nature, and also excludes the contributions of activities classified as discontinued operations. Because adjusted operating earnings and adjusted operating earnings by segment are performance measures that management uses to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance, the Company believes it provides useful information for both management and its investors. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with the Company request its operating financial results in an adjusted operating earnings format.

-26-


Adjusted operating earnings isand adjusted operating earnings by segment are not a measuremeasures of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and should not be considered as a substitute for operating earnings, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data. The Company’s definitiondefinitions of adjusted operating earnings and adjusted operating earnings by segment may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Following is a reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) to adjusted operating earnings for the fiscal years ended January 2, 20162018, 2017 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013. For comparability purposes, the Company has also provided a reconciliation of operating earnings to adjusted operating earnings for the 51 weeks ended December 28, 2013. 2016.

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Operating earnings (loss)

$

 

70,512

 

 

$

 

(106,675

)

 

$

 

109,184

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

4,937

 

 

 

 

8,101

 

 

 

 

6,959

 

Restructuring, goodwill/asset impairment and other charges

 

 

37,546

 

 

 

 

228,459

 

 

 

 

32,116

 

Fresh Kitchen start-up costs

 

 

1,366

 

 

 

 

8,082

 

 

 

 

 

Stock compensation associated with executive retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,172

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses associated with tax planning strategies

 

 

225

 

 

 

 

3,798

 

 

 

 

 

Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives

 

 

1,023

 

 

 

 

368

 

 

 

 

859

 

Adjusted operating earnings

$

 

115,609

 

 

$

 

143,305

 

 

$

 

149,118

 

Reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) to adjusted operating earnings by segment:

 

Food Distribution:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

$

 

48,752

 

 

$

 

83,115

 

 

$

 

85,296

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

3,581

 

 

 

 

6,244

 

 

 

 

3,703

 

Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges

 

 

33,056

 

 

 

 

1,317

 

 

 

 

5,068

 

Fresh Kitchen start-up costs

 

 

1,366

 

 

 

 

8,082

 

 

 

 

 

Stock compensation associated with executive retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

591

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses associated with tax planning strategies

 

 

116

 

 

 

 

1,744

 

 

 

 

 

Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives

 

 

763

 

 

 

 

342

 

 

 

 

229

 

Adjusted operating earnings

$

 

87,634

 

 

$

 

101,435

 

 

$

 

94,296

 

Military:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

$

 

5,647

 

 

$

 

6,969

 

 

$

 

12,216

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

 

1

 

Restructuring (gains) charges

 

 

(801

)

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

(473

)

Stock compensation associated with executive retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

147

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses associated with tax planning strategies

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

593

 

 

 

 

 

Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives

 

 

107

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

245

 

Adjusted operating earnings

$

 

4,985

 

 

$

 

9,738

 

 

$

 

11,989

 

Retail:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings (loss)

$

 

16,113

 

 

$

 

(196,759

)

 

$

 

11,672

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

1,352

 

 

 

 

335

 

 

 

 

3,255

 

Restructuring charges and goodwill/asset impairment

 

 

5,291

 

 

 

 

226,642

 

 

 

 

27,521

 

Stock compensation associated with executive retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

434

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses associated with tax planning strategies

 

 

81

 

 

 

 

1,461

 

 

 

 

 

Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives

 

 

153

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

385

 

Adjusted operating earnings

$

 

22,990

 

 

$

 

32,132

 

 

$

 

42,833

 

-25-


 

Year Ended

 

 

Period Ended

 

 

January 2,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2013

 

 

2013

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(51 weeks)

 

 

(39 weeks)

 

Operating earnings

$

 

122,875

 

 

$

 

114,846

 

 

$

 

35,553

 

 

$

 

16,793

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

8,433

 

 

 

 

12,675

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

8,802

 

 

 

 

6,166

 

 

 

 

16,877

 

 

 

 

15,644

 

Adjustable items related to cost reduction initiatives

 

 

549

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fees and expenses related to tax planning strategies

 

 

569

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock compensation modifications

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,174

 

 

 

 

4,174

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,578

 

 

 

 

621

 

 

 

 

621

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,038

)

 

 

 

(1,038

)

Adjusted operating earnings, including 53rd week

 

 

141,228

 

 

 

 

136,165

 

 

 

 

77,180

 

 

 

 

57,187

 

53rd week

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,673

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted operating earnings, excluding 53rd week

$

 

141,228

 

 

$

 

132,492

 

 

$

 

77,180

 

 

$

 

57,187

 

Reconciliation of operating earnings to adjusted operating earnings by segment:

 

Military:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

$

 

17,059

 

 

$

 

21,721

 

 

$

 

1,901

 

 

$

 

1,901

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

1,048

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustable items related to cost reduction initiatives

 

 

125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fees and expenses related to tax planning strategies

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted operating earnings, including 53rd week

 

 

18,307

 

 

 

 

21,902

 

 

 

 

1,901

 

 

 

 

1,901

 

53rd week

 

 

 

 

 

 

(573

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted operating earnings, excluding 53rd week

$

 

18,307

 

 

$

 

21,329

 

 

$

 

1,901

 

 

$

 

1,901

 

Food Distribution:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings (loss)

$

 

78,841

 

 

$

 

54,802

 

 

$

 

11,388

 

 

$

 

(1,328

)

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

2,037

 

 

 

 

12,644

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

Restructuring (gains) charges and asset impairment

 

 

(216

)

 

 

 

(241

)

 

 

 

599

 

 

 

 

599

 

Adjustable items related to cost reduction initiatives

 

 

150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fees and expenses related to tax planning strategies

 

 

282

 

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock compensation modifications

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,961

 

 

 

 

3,961

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

801

 

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

 

236

 

Adjusted operating earnings, including 53rd week

 

 

81,094

 

 

 

 

68,491

 

 

 

 

37,177

 

 

 

 

24,461

 

53rd week

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,132

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted operating earnings, excluding 53rd week

$

 

81,094

 

 

$

 

67,359

 

 

$

 

37,177

 

 

$

 

24,461

 

Retail:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

$

 

26,975

 

 

$

 

38,323

 

 

$

 

22,264

 

 

$

 

16,220

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

6,396

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

7,970

 

 

 

 

6,407

 

 

 

 

16,278

 

 

 

 

15,045

 

Adjustable items related to cost reduction initiatives

 

 

274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fees and expenses related to tax planning strategies

 

 

212

 

 

 

 

328

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock compensation modifications

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

213

 

 

 

 

213

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

710

 

 

 

 

385

 

 

 

 

385

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,038

)

 

 

 

(1,038

)

Adjusted operating earnings, including 53rd week

 

 

41,827

 

 

 

 

45,772

 

 

 

 

38,102

 

 

 

 

30,825

 

53rd week

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,968

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted operating earnings, excluding 53rd week

$

 

41,827

 

 

$

 

43,804

 

 

$

 

38,102

 

 

$

 

30,825

 

-26-


Adjusted Earnings from Continuing Operations

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that the Company defines as earnings from continuing operations plus or minus adjustments for items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of the Company and costs associated with the closing of operational locations.

-27-


The Company believes that adjusted earnings from continuing operations provide a meaningful representation of its operating performance for the Company. The Company considers adjusted earnings from continuing operations as an additional way to measure operating performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted earnings from continuing operations is meant to reflect the ongoing operating performance of all of its distribution and retail operations; consequently, it excludes the impact of items that could be considered “non-operating” or “non-core” in nature, and also excludes the contributions of activities classified as discontinued operations. Because adjusted earnings from continuing operations is a performance measure that management uses to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance, the Company believes it provides useful information for both management and its investors. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with the Company request its operating financial results in adjusted earnings from continuing operations format.

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations is not a measure of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should not be considered as a substitute for net earnings, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data. The Company’s definition of adjusted earnings from continuing operations may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Following is a reconciliation of earnings (loss) from continuing operations to adjusted earnings from continuing operations for the fiscal years ended January 2, 20162018, 2017 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013. For comparability purposes, the Company has also provided a reconciliation of earnings from continuing operations to adjusted earnings from continuing operations for the 51 weeks ended December 28, 2013.

2016.

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

per diluted

 

 

 

 

 

per diluted

 

 

 

 

 

per diluted

 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

Earnings

 

 

share

 

 

Earnings

 

 

share

 

 

Earnings

 

 

share

 

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

$

 

33,791

 

 

$

 

0.94

 

 

$

 

(52,617

)

 

$

 

(1.41

)

 

$

 

57,056

 

 

$

 

1.52

 

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

4,937

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,959

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring, goodwill/asset impairment and other charges

 

 

37,546

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

228,459

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,116

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fresh Kitchen start-up costs

 

 

1,366

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,082

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses associated with tax planning strategies

 

 

225

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,798

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance associated with cost reduction initiatives

 

 

1,023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

368

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

859

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock compensation associated with executive retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,172

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total adjustments

 

 

45,097

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

249,980

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax effect on adjustments (a)

 

 

(11,139

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(92,767

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,071

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (b)

 

 

(494

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(25,992

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total adjustments, net of taxes

 

 

33,464

 

 

 

 

0.93

 

 

 

 

131,221

 

 

 

 

3.51

 

 

 

 

25,110

 

 

 

 

0.68

 

 

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations

$

 

67,255

 

 

$

 

1.87

 

 

$

 

78,604

 

 

$

 

2.10

 

 

$

 

82,166

 

 

$

 

2.19

 

 

  (a)

The income tax effect on adjustments is computed by applying the applicable tax rate to the adjustments.

  (b)

Includes a $1.1 million and $4.8 million tax benefit attributable to tax planning strategies related to the Tax Act for 2018 and 2017, respectively.

-27-


 

Year Ended

 

 

 

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

 

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings from

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings from

 

 

 

Earnings

 

 

continuing

 

 

Earnings

 

 

continuing

 

 

 

from

 

 

operations

 

 

from

 

 

operations

 

 

 

continuing

 

 

per diluted

 

 

continuing

 

 

per diluted

 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

operations

 

 

share

 

 

operations

 

 

share

 

 

Earnings from continuing operations

$

 

63,166

 

 

$

 

1.67

 

 

$

 

59,120

 

 

$

 

1.57

 

 

Adjustments, net of taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

5,286

 

 

 

 

0.14

 

 

 

 

7,867

 

 

 

 

0.21

 

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

5,451

 

 

 

 

0.15

 

*

 

 

3,827

 

 

 

 

0.10

 

 

Adjustable items related to cost reduction initiatives

 

 

340

 

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax planning strategies, net of fees and expenses

 

 

(382

)

 

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

979

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

*

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

725

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Favorable settlement of unrecognized tax liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,849

)

 

 

 

(0.05

)

 

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations, including 53rd week

 

 

74,586

 

 

 

 

1.98

 

 

 

 

69,944

 

 

 

 

1.85

 

 

53rd week

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,022

)

 

 

 

(0.05

)

 

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations, excluding 53rd week

$

 

74,586

 

 

$

 

1.98

 

 

$

 

67,922

 

 

$

 

1.80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

 

 

37,718

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,710

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Includes rounding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Period Ended

 

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

 

 

(51 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings from

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings from

 

 

 

Earnings

 

 

continuing

 

 

Earnings

 

 

continuing

 

 

 

from

 

 

operations

 

 

from

 

 

operations

 

 

 

continuing

 

 

per diluted

 

 

continuing

 

 

per diluted

 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

operations

 

 

share

 

 

operations

 

 

share

 

 

Earnings from continuing operations

$

 

9,168

 

 

$

 

0.39

 

 

$

 

1,229

 

 

$

 

0.05

 

 

Adjustments, net of taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

15,179

 

 

 

 

0.64

 

 

 

 

15,179

 

 

 

 

0.63

 

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

10,460

 

 

 

 

0.44

 

 

 

 

9,702

 

 

 

 

0.40

 

 

Stock compensation modifications

 

 

2,589

 

 

 

 

0.11

 

 

 

 

2,589

 

 

 

 

0.11

 

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

385

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

 

385

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

(644

)

 

 

 

(0.03

)

 

 

 

(644

)

 

 

 

(0.03

)

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

5,142

 

 

 

 

0.22

 

 

 

 

3,428

 

 

 

 

0.14

 

 

Tax benefit related to change in state deferred tax rate

 

 

(2,418

)

 

 

 

(0.10

)

 

 

 

(2,418

)

 

 

 

(0.10

)

 

Unrecognized tax liability

 

 

595

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

*

 

 

595

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

Favorable settlement of unrecognized tax liability

 

 

(244

)

 

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

 

(244

)

 

 

 

(0.01

)

 

Adjusted earnings from continuing operations

$

 

40,212

 

 

$

 

1.70

 

 

$

 

29,801

 

 

$

 

1.23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

 

 

23,664

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,229

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Includes rounding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


-28-


Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDAEarnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“adjusted EBITDA”) is a non-GAAP operating financial measure that the Company defines as operatingnet earnings (loss) plus interest, discontinued operations, depreciation and amortization, and other non-cash items including deferred (stock) compensation, the LIFO provision, as well as adjustments for items that do not reflect the ongoing operating activities of the Company and costs associated with the closing of operational locations.

The Company believes that adjusted EBITDA provides a meaningful representation of its operating performance for the Company as a whole and for its operating segments. The Company considers adjusted EBITDA as an additional way to measure operating performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted EBITDA is meant to reflect the ongoing operating performance of all of its distribution and retail operations; consequently, it excludes the impact of items that could be considered “non-operating” or “non-core” in nature, and also excludes the contributions of activities classified as discontinued operations. Because adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA by segment are performance measures that management uses to allocate resources, assess performance against its peers and evaluate overall performance, the Company believes it provides useful information for both management and its investors. In addition, securities analysts, fund managers and other shareholders and stakeholders that communicate with the Company request its operating financial results in an adjusted EBITDA format.

-28-


Adjusted EBITDA isand adjusted EBITDA by segment are not a measuremeasures of performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should not be considered as a substitute for net earnings, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data. The Company’s definitiondefinitions of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA by segment may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Following is a reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) to adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal years ended January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013. For comparability purposes, the Company has also provided a reconciliation of net earnings to adjusted EBITDA for the 51 weeks ended December 28, 2013.

-29-


 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Period Ended

 

 

January 2,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2013

 

 

2013

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(51 Weeks)

 

 

(39 weeks)

 

Operating earnings

$

 

122,875

 

 

$

 

114,846

 

 

$

 

35,553

 

 

$

 

16,793

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIFO (income) expense

 

 

(1,201

)

 

 

 

5,604

 

 

 

 

279

 

 

 

 

928

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

83,334

 

 

 

 

86,994

 

 

 

 

46,664

 

 

 

 

37,082

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

8,433

 

 

 

 

12,675

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

8,802

 

 

 

 

6,166

 

 

 

 

16,877

 

 

 

 

15,644

 

Fees and expenses related to tax planning strategies

 

 

569

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,578

 

 

 

 

621

 

 

 

 

621

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

7,240

 

 

 

 

6,939

 

 

 

 

7,763

 

 

 

 

6,951

 

Other non-cash gains

 

 

(530

)

 

 

 

(1,260

)

 

 

 

(1,806

)

 

 

 

(1,709

)

Adjusted EBITDA, including 53rd week

 

 

229,522

 

 

 

 

234,442

 

 

 

 

126,944

 

 

 

 

97,303

 

53rd week

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,673

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA, excluding 53rd week

$

 

229,522

 

 

$

 

230,769

 

 

$

 

126,944

 

 

$

 

97,303

 

Reconciliation of operating earnings to adjusted EBITDA by segment:

 

Military:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

$

 

17,059

 

 

$

 

21,721

 

 

$

 

1,901

 

 

$

 

1,901

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIFO expense

 

 

108

 

 

 

 

1,262

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

12,081

 

 

 

 

11,350

 

 

 

 

1,412

 

 

 

 

1,371

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

1,048

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fees and expenses related to tax planning strategies

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

 

577

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other non-cash charges (gains)

 

 

235

 

 

 

 

(62

)

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

(6

)

Adjusted EBITDA, including 53rd week

 

 

31,743

 

 

 

 

35,029

 

 

 

 

3,307

 

 

 

 

3,266

 

53rd week

 

 

 

 

 

 

(573

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA, excluding 53rd week

$

 

31,743

 

 

$

 

34,456

 

 

$

 

3,307

 

 

$

 

3,266

 

Food Distribution:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings (loss)

$

 

78,841

 

 

$

 

54,802

 

 

$

 

11,388

 

 

$

 

(1,328

)

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIFO (income) expense

 

 

(1,634

)

 

 

 

2,893

 

 

 

 

(232

)

 

 

 

289

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

26,127

 

 

 

 

29,816

 

 

 

 

9,306

 

 

 

 

9,547

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

2,037

 

 

 

 

12,644

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

Restructuring (gains) charges and asset impairment

 

 

(216

)

 

 

 

(241

)

 

 

 

599

 

 

 

 

599

 

Fees and expenses related to tax planning strategies

 

 

282

 

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

801

 

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

 

236

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

3,337

 

 

 

 

3,258

 

 

 

 

3,581

 

 

 

 

4,880

 

Other non-cash charges (gains)

 

 

49

 

 

 

 

(318

)

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

33

 

Adjusted EBITDA, including 53rd week

 

 

108,823

 

 

 

 

104,140

 

 

 

 

45,946

 

 

 

 

35,249

 

53rd week

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,132

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA, excluding 53rd week

$

 

108,823

 

 

$

 

103,008

 

 

$

 

45,946

 

 

$

 

35,249

 

Retail:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

$

 

26,975

 

 

$

 

38,323

 

 

$

 

22,264

 

 

$

 

16,220

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIFO expense

 

 

325

 

 

 

 

1,449

 

 

 

 

511

 

 

 

 

639

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

45,126

 

 

 

 

45,828

 

 

 

 

35,946

 

 

 

 

26,164

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

6,396

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

7,970

 

 

 

 

6,407

 

 

 

 

16,278

 

 

 

 

15,045

 

Fees and expenses related to tax planning strategies

 

 

212

 

 

 

 

328

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

710

 

 

 

 

385

 

 

 

 

385

 

-30-


Stock-based compensation

 

 

2,766

 

 

 

 

3,104

 

 

 

 

4,182

 

 

 

 

2,071

 

Other non-cash gains

 

 

(814

)

 

 

 

(880

)

 

 

 

(1,875

)

 

 

 

(1,736

)

Adjusted EBITDA, including 53rd week

 

 

88,956

 

 

 

 

95,273

 

 

 

 

77,691

 

 

 

 

58,788

 

53rd week

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,968

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA, excluding 53rd week

$

 

88,956

 

 

$

 

93,305

 

 

$

 

77,691

 

 

$

 

58,788

 

Results of Continuing Operations for the 52 Week Fiscal Year Ended January 2, 2016 Compared to the 53 Week Fiscal Year Ended January 3, 2015

Net Sales Net sales for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016 (“fiscal 2015”) decreased $264.1 million, or 3.3%, from $7.92 billion in the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 (“fiscal 2014”), to $7.65 billion. Excluding the extra week in fiscal 2014, which accounted for $135.2 millionFollowing is a reconciliation of net sales, the decrease of 1.7% was primarily dueearnings (loss) to decreases in comparable retail store sales, excluding fuel; lower sales resulting from retail storeadjusted EBITDA for 2018, 2017 and fuel center closures; lower retail fuel prices; and lower sales at the DeCA-operated commissaries.2016.

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net earnings (loss)

$

 

33,572

 

 

$

 

(52,845

)

 

$

 

56,828

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

219

 

 

 

 

228

 

 

 

 

228

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

6,907

 

 

 

 

(79,027

)

 

 

 

32,907

 

Other expenses, net

 

 

29,814

 

 

 

 

24,969

 

 

 

 

19,221

 

Operating earnings (loss)

 

 

70,512

 

 

 

 

(106,675

)

 

 

 

109,184

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIFO expense (benefit)

 

 

4,601

 

 

 

 

2,898

 

 

 

 

(1,919

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

82,634

 

 

 

 

82,243

 

 

 

 

77,246

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

4,937

 

 

 

 

8,101

 

 

 

 

6,959

 

Restructuring, goodwill/asset impairment and other charges

 

 

37,546

 

 

 

 

228,459

 

 

 

 

32,116

 

Expenses associated with tax planning strategies

 

 

225

 

 

 

 

3,798

 

 

 

 

 

Fresh Kitchen start-up costs

 

 

1,366

 

 

 

 

8,082

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

7,646

 

 

 

 

9,611

 

 

 

 

7,936

 

Other non-cash gains

 

 

(46

)

 

 

 

(515

)

 

 

 

(148

)

Adjusted EBITDA

$

 

209,421

 

 

$

 

236,002

 

 

$

 

231,374

 

Reconciliation of operating earnings (loss) to adjusted EBITDA by segment:

 

Food Distribution:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

$

 

48,752

 

 

$

 

83,115

 

 

$

 

85,296

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIFO expense (benefit)

 

 

2,270

 

 

 

 

2,036

 

 

 

 

(1,128

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

31,854

 

 

 

 

29,258

 

 

 

 

21,397

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

3,581

 

 

 

 

6,244

 

 

 

 

3,703

 

Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges

 

 

33,056

 

 

 

 

1,317

 

 

 

 

5,068

 

Expenses associated with tax planning strategies

 

 

116

 

 

 

 

1,744

 

 

 

 

 

Fresh Kitchen start-up costs

 

 

1,366

 

 

 

 

8,082

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

3,626

 

 

 

 

4,457

 

 

 

 

3,491

 

Other non-cash charges

 

 

724

 

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

 

152

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$

 

125,345

 

 

$

 

136,563

 

 

$

 

117,979

 

Military:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

$

 

5,647

 

 

$

 

6,969

 

 

$

 

12,216

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIFO expense (benefit)

 

 

1,230

 

 

 

 

394

 

 

 

 

(331

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

11,968

 

 

 

 

11,626

 

 

 

 

11,484

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

 

1

 

Restructuring (gains) charges and asset impairment

 

 

(801

)

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

 

(473

)

Expenses associated with tax planning strategies

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

593

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

1,244

 

 

 

 

1,491

 

 

 

 

1,347

 

Other non-cash (gains) charges

 

 

(273

)

 

 

 

(20

)

 

 

 

261

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$

 

19,047

 

 

$

 

23,075

 

 

$

 

24,505

 

Retail:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings (loss)

$

 

16,113

 

 

$

 

(196,759

)

 

$

 

11,672

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIFO expense (benefit)

 

 

1,101

 

 

 

 

468

 

 

 

 

(460

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

38,812

 

 

 

 

41,359

 

 

 

 

44,365

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

1,352

 

 

 

 

335

 

 

 

 

3,255

 

Restructuring charges and goodwill/asset impairment

 

 

5,291

 

 

 

 

226,642

 

 

 

 

27,521

 

Expenses associated with tax planning strategies

 

 

81

 

 

 

 

1,461

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

2,776

 

 

 

 

3,663

 

 

 

 

3,098

 

Other non-cash gains

 

 

(497

)

 

 

 

(805

)

 

 

 

(561

)

Adjusted EBITDA

$

 

65,029

 

 

$

 

76,364

 

 

$

 

88,890

 

Net sales for fiscal 2015 in the Military segment decreased $68.4 million, or 3.0%, from $2.28 billion in fiscal 2014 to $2.21 billion. Excluding the extra week in fiscal 2014, which accounted for $36.9 million of net sales, the decrease of 1.4% was primarily due to lower sales at the DeCA-operated commissaries.

Net sales for fiscal 2015 in the Food Distribution segment, after intercompany eliminations, decreased $51.2 million, or 1.5%, from $3.36 billion in fiscal 2014 to $3.31 billion. Excluding the extra week in fiscal 2014, which accounted for $56.5 million of net sales, and despite low inflation, net sales increased 1.7% primarily due to net new business.

Net sales for fiscal 2015 in the Retail segment decreased $144.5 million, or 6.3%, from $2.28 billion in fiscal 2014 to $2.14 billion. Excluding the extra week in fiscal 2014, which accounted for $41.8 million of net sales in fiscal 2014, the decrease of 4.6% was primarily due to $71.1 million of lower sales due to the closure of retail stores and fuel centers, a 2.9% decrease in comparable stores sales, excluding fuel, and significantly lower fuel prices compared to last year, partially offset by $53.2 million of net sales from the acquired Dan’s stores.

The decline in comparable store sales reflects the low inflationary environment and increased competition primarily in the western geographic areas, as well as the unseasonably warm weather in the Michigan geographic area in this year’s fourth quarter. The Company defines a retail store as comparable when it is in operation for 14 accounting periods (a period equals four weeks), and it includes remodeled, expanded and relocated stores in comparable stores.

Gross Profit Gross profit represents net sales less cost of sales, which include purchase costs, freight, physical inventory adjustments, markdowns and promotional allowances. Vendor allowances that relate to the buying and merchandising activities consist primarily of promotional allowances, which are generally allowances on purchased quantities and, to a lesser extent, slotting allowances, which are billed to vendors for the Company’s merchandising costs, such as setting up warehouse infrastructure. Vendor allowances associated with product cost are recognized as a reduction in cost of sales when the product is sold. Lump sum payments received for multi-year contracts are amortized over the life of the contracts based on contractual terms

Gross profit for fiscal 2015 was $1.12 billion compared to $1.16 billion in fiscal 2014, representing 14.6% of net sales in both years. Higher fuel margin rates in fiscal 2015 were offset by the net impact of low inflation related gains and LIFO expense, as well as a higher mix of lower margin Military and Food Distribution sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages, employee benefits, warehousing costs, store occupancy costs, shipping and handling, utilities, equipment rental, depreciation and other administrative costs.

SG&A expenses for fiscal 2015 decreased $46.8 million, or 4.6%, from $1.02 billion in fiscal 2014 to $975.6 million, and were 12.8% of net sales compared to 12.9% in fiscal 2014. Excluding the extra week in fiscal 2014, SG&A expenses decreased $31.3 million, or 3.1%, and the percent to net sales in fiscal 2014 was 12.9%. The decrease was due primarily to benefits from merger synergies, cost improvements resulting from productivity and efficiency initiatives, the impact of store closures, and lower healthcare and transportation costs. The decrease in the rate to net sales was primarily due to expense control initiatives, benefits from merger synergies and lower healthcare costs.

Merger Integration and Acquisition Expenses Merger integration and acquisition expenses consist of costs to integrate operations following the merger with Nash-Finch as well as costs incurred in connection with fiscal 2015 acquisitions. Merger integration and acquisition expenses for fiscal 2015 decreased $4.3 million, or 33.5%, from $12.7 million in fiscal 2014 to $8.4 million.

-31--30-


 

 

Restructuring Charges and Asset Impairment Fiscal 2015 consisted of $8.8 million in charges primarily related to underperforming retail stores and costs related to the closure of retail stores and distribution centers, partially offset by the gains on sales of assets related to a previously closed food distribution center and retail stores and the favorable settlements of lease terminations of previously closed stores. Fiscal 2014 included charges of $6.2 million related to underperforming retail stores and costs associated with closed retail stores and a closed distribution center.

Interest Expense Interest expense decreased $2.6 million, or 10.6%, from $24.4 million in fiscal 2014 to $21.8 million in fiscal 2015. As a percent of net sales, interest expense was 0.3% in both years. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to decreased borrowings and lower interest rates resulting from the amended senior secured credit agreement. On January 9, 2015, the Company amended its credit agreement which reduced the interest rate.

Debt Extinguishment A loss on debt extinguishment of $1.2 million was incurred in fiscal 2015 in connection with the prepayment of the Senior Notes (see Debt Management under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”).

Income Taxes The effective income tax rates were 37.0% and 34.6% for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. The difference from the statutory Federal rate in fiscal 2015 was primarily due to state income taxes. The fiscal 2014 effective rate differs from the Federal statutory rate primarily due to the favorable settlement of unrecognized tax liabilities, partially offset by state income taxes.

Results of Continuing Operations for the 53 Week Fiscal Year Ended January 3, 2015 Compared to the 51-Week Period Ended December 28, 2013

Net Sales Net sales for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 (“fiscal 2014”) increased $4.73 billion, or 148.1%, from $3.19 billion in the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013, to $7.92 billion. The sales increase was primarily driven by the merger with Nash-Finch Company which added $4.60 billion, the two additional weeks, and incremental sales related to new food distribution customers, partially offset by lost sales related to closed retail stores. The 53rd week added $135.2 million of net sales.

Net sales for fiscal 2014 in the Military segment increased $2.03 billion, or 815.2% from $248.6 million in the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013 to $2.28 billion primarily due to the inclusion of only six weeks of Nash-Finch operations in the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013 and the 53rd week, which contributed $36.9 million of net sales.

Net sales for fiscal 2014 in the Food Distribution segment, after intercompany eliminations, increased $2.00 billion, or 148.1%, from $1.35 billion in the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013 to $3.36 billion primarily due to additional sales of $1.91 billion resulting from the merger and two additional weeks of net sales. The 53rd week contributed $56.5 million of net sales.

Net sales for fiscal 2014 in the Retail segment increased $695.5 million, or 43.8%, from $1.59 billion in the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013 to $2.28 billion. The sales increase was primarily due to sales of $694.9 million resulting from the merger, two additional weeks of net sales and an increase in supermarket comparable store sales, partially offset by lost sales from closed and sold stores and lower fuel sales prices. The 53rd week contributed $41.8 million of net sales.

Total retail comparable store sales, excluding fuel centers, on a 53 week basis increased approximately 0.9% in fiscal 2014. The Company defines a retail store as comparable when it is in operation for 14 accounting periods (a period equals four weeks), and the Company includes remodeled, expanded and relocated stores in comparable stores.

Gross Profit Gross profit, as described previously, increased by $536.6 million, or 86.6%, from $619.5 million to $1.16 billion. The margin increase was primarily driven by the merger with Nash-Finch Company, which added $526.9 million and the two additional weeks. As a percent of net sales, gross profit decreased from 19.4% to 14.6%. The gross profit rate decrease was principally driven by sales mix due to the merger with Nash-Finch.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses SG&A expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages, employee benefits, warehousing costs, store occupancy costs, shipping and handling, utilities, equipment rental, depreciation and other administrative costs.

SG&A expenses increased $476.3 million, or 87.2%, from $546.1 million to $1.02 billion, and were 12.9% of net sales compared to 17.1% last year. The increase was due primarily to $477.8 million in expenses related to the Nash-Finch operations and the extra two weeks, partially offset by the impact of merger synergies and closed stores. The decrease as a percent of net sales was due primarily to the change in mix of the Company’s segments, store closures and merger synergies.

-32-


Merger Transaction and Integration Expenses Merger transaction and integration expenses consist of expenses related to consummating the merger with Nash-Finch on November 19, 2013 and costs to integrate the operations of the two companies. Merger transaction and integration expenses for fiscal 2014 decreased $8.3 million, or 39.6%, from $21.0 million in the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013, to $12.7 million.

Restructuring Charges and Asset Impairment Fiscal 2014 included charges of $6.2 million related to underperforming retail stores and costs associated with closed retail stores and a closed distribution center. The 51-week period ended December 28, 2013 included charges of $16.9 million related to underperforming retail stores, market deterioration in property held for future development and severance costs related to store closings and the closing of a distribution center.

Interest Expense Interest expense increased $12.2 million, or 100.0%, from $12.2 million in the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013 to $24.4 million in fiscal 2014. As a percent of net sales, interest expense decreased from 0.4% to 0.3%. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to additional borrowings entered into to finance the merger with Nash-Finch Company on November 19, 2013.

Debt Extinguishment A loss on debt extinguishment of $8.3 million was incurred in the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013 in connection with amending and restating the senior secured revolving credit facility and repaying certain other debt instruments and the redemption of $57.4 million of Convertible Senior Notes.

Income Taxes The effective income tax rates were 34.6% and 39.2% for fiscal 2014 and the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively. The difference from the statutory Federal rate in fiscal 2014 is due primarily to the favorable settlement of unrecognized tax liabilities, partially offset by state income taxes. The 51-week period ended December 28, 2013 differs from the Federal statutory rate due to non-deductible merger related expenses and changes in unrecognized tax liabilities, partially offset by a reduction in the state deferred tax rate.

Results of Continuing Operations for the 53 Week Fiscal Year Ended January 3, 2015 Compared to the 39-Week Period Ended December 28, 2013

Net Sales Net sales for the 53 week year ended January 3, 2015 (“fiscal 2014”) increased $5.32 billion, or 204.8%, from $2.60 billion in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, to $7.92 billion. The sales increase was primarily driven by the merger with Nash-Finch, which added $4.60 billion, the 14 additional weeks, which added $773.5 million, and incremental sales related to new food distribution customers, partially offset by lost sales from closed stores.

Net sales for fiscal 2014 in the Military segment increased $2.03 billion, or 815.2% from $248.6 million in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, to $2.28 billion. The sales increase was primarily driven by additional sales resulting from the merger.

Net sales for fiscal 2014 in the Food Distribution segment, after intercompany eliminations, increased $2.26 billion, or 206.3%, from $1.10 billion in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 to $3.36 billion. The sales increase was primarily due to additional sales of $1.91 billion resulting from the merger, 14 additional weeks, which contributed $331.7 million of net sales and new business sales.

Net sales for fiscal 2014 in the Retail segment increased $1.03 billion, or 82.3%, from $1.25 billion in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 to $2.28 billion. The sales increase was primarily due to sales of $694.9 million resulting from the merger, an additional 14 weeks, which contributed $405.0 million of net sales, partially offset by lost sales related to closed stores and lower fuel sales prices.

Gross Profit Gross profit, as described previously, for fiscal 2014 increased by $669.2 million, or 137.4%, from $486.9 million in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, to $1.16 billion. The increase was primarily due to the merger with Nash-Finch Company, which added $526.9 million and the 14 additional weeks, which added $160.9 million. As a percent of net sales, gross profit decreased from 18.7% to 14.6%. The gross profit rate decrease was principally driven by sales mix due to the merger with Nash-Finch.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses SG&A expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages, employee benefits, warehousing costs, store occupancy costs, shipping and handling, utilities, equipment rental, depreciation and other administrative costs.

-33-


SG&A expenses for fiscal 2014 increased $588.9 million, or 135.9%, from $433.5 million in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, to $1.02 billion, and were 12.9% of net sales for fiscal 2014 compared to 16.7% for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $477.8 million in expenses related to the inclusion of the Nash-Finch operations for only six weeks in the prior year period, an additional 14 weeks, which added $137.6 million in expenses, partially offset by the impact of merger synergies and closed stores. The decrease in the rate to net sales was due primarily to the change in mix of the Company’s segments, store closures and cost reduction efforts.

Merger Transaction and Integration Expenses Merger transaction and integration expenses consist of expenses related to consummating the merger with Nash-Finch on November 19, 2013 and costs to integrate the operations of the two companies. Merger transaction and integration expenses for fiscal 2014 decreased $8.3 million, or 39.6%, from $21.0 million in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, to $12.7 million.

Restructuring and Asset Impairment Fiscal 2014 included charges of $6.2 million related to underperforming retail stores and the closure of retail stores and distribution center. The 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 included charges of $15.6 million related to underperforming retail stores, market deterioration in property held for future development and costs related to the closure of retail stores and a distribution center.

Interest Expense Interest expense increased $15.2 million, or 164.8%, from $9.2 million in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 to $24.4 million in fiscal 2014. As a percent of net sales, interest expense decreased from 0.4% in the period ended December 28, 2013 to 0.3% for fiscal 2014. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to additional borrowings entered into to finance the merger with Nash-Finch.

Debt Extinguishment A loss on debt extinguishment of $5.5 million was incurred in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 in connection with amending and restating the senior secured revolving credit facility and repaying certain other debt instruments.

Income Taxes The effective income tax rates were 34.6% and 40.6% for fiscal 2014 and the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively. The difference from the statutory Federal rate in fiscal 2014 is due primarily to the favorable settlement of unrecognized tax liabilities, partially offset by state income taxes. The prior year period ended December 28, 2013 differs from the Federal statutory rate due to non-deductible merger related expenses and changes in unrecognized tax liabilities, partially offset by a reduction in the state deferred tax rate.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, assets held for sale, long-lived assets, income taxes, self-insurance reserves, restructuring costs, retirement benefits, stock-based compensation, contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that may not be readily apparent from other sources. Based on the Company’s ongoing review, the Company makes adjustments it considers appropriate under the facts and circumstances. This discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations is based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company believes these accounting policies and others set forth in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements should be reviewed as they are integral to understanding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The Company has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

An accounting policy is considered critical ifif: a) it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and ifb) different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company considers the following accounting policies to represent the more critical estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:

-34-


Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with approximately 88.9% of the majority of which useCompany’s inventories valued using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. The remaining inventories are valued on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. The Company accounts for its MilitaryFood Distribution and Food DistributionMilitary inventory using a perpetual system and utilizes the retail inventory method (“RIM”) to value inventory for center store products in the Retail segment. Under the RIM, inventory is stated at cost with cost of sales and gross margin calculated by applying a cost ratio to the retail value of inventories. RIM is an averaging method that has been widely used in the retail industry. Inherent in the RIM calculations are certain significant management judgments and estimates, including inventory shortages and cost-to-retail ratios, which impact the ending inventory valuation at cost, as well as the resulting gross profit. Management consistently applies its RIM valuations by product category and believes that the Company’s RIM provides an inventory valuation that reasonably approximates cost.

Fresh, pharmacy and fuel products are accounted for at cost in the Retail segment. The Company evaluates inventory shortages throughout the year based on actual physical counts in its facilities. The Company records allowances for inventory shortages based on the results of recent physical counts to provide for estimated shortages from the last physical count to the financial statement date. The estimates and assumptions used in valuing inventories, including those used in past calculations, are reviewed and applied consistently, and as a result, the Company believes the estimates and assumptions are both reasonable and accurate. The Company does not anticipate future changes to the estimates or assumptions used in valuing inventories, but it does anticipate that inflation and/or deflation will continue to have a significant impact on the Company’s LIFO reserve as price changes represent a significant driver of the calculation.

Vendor Funds, Allowances and Credits

The Company receives funds from many of its vendors when purchasing products to sell to its corporate-ownedcorporate owned retail stores and independent retail customers.retailers. Given the highly promotional nature of the retail supermarket industry, vendor allowances are generally intended to help defray the costs of promotion, advertising and selling the vendor’s products. Vendor allowances that relate to the Company’s buying and merchandising activities consist primarily of promotional allowances, which are generally allowances on purchased quantities and, to a lesser extent, slotting allowances, which are billed to vendors for the Company’s merchandising costs such as setting up warehouse infrastructure. The proper recognition and timing of accounting for these items are significant to the reporting of the results of the Company’s operations. Vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction in cost of sales when the related product is sold. Lump sum payments received for multi-year contracts are amortized over the life of the contracts based on contractual terms. The amount and timing of recognition of vendor funds as well as the amount of vendor funds to be recognized as a reduction to ending inventory requires management judgment and estimates. Management determines these amounts based on estimates of current year purchase volume using forecast and historical data and review of average inventory turnover data. These judgments and estimates impact the Company’s reported gross profit, operating earnings (loss) and inventory amounts. The Company believes its historical estimates and use of this methodology have been reliable in the past and will continue to be reliable in the future.

-31-


Customer Exposure and Credit Risk

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – Methodology.Accounts. The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts and notes receivable based on a combination of factors. In most circumstances when the Company becomes aware of factors that may indicate a deterioration in a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations (e.g., reductions of product purchases, deteriorating store conditions, changes in payment patterns), the Company records a specific reserve to reduce the receivable to an amount the Company reasonably believes will be collected. In determining the adequacy of the reserves, the Company analyzes factors such as the value of any collateral, customer financial statements, historical collection experience, aging of receivables and other economic and industry factors. It is possible that the accuracy of the estimation process could be materially affected by different judgments as to the collectability based on information considered and further deterioration of accounts. If circumstances change (e.g., further evidence of material adverse creditworthiness, additional accounts become credit risks, store closures), the Company’s estimates of the recoverability of amounts due could be reduced by a material amount, including to zero.

Funds Advanced to Independent Retailers. From time to time, the Company may advance funds to independent retailers which are earned by the retailers primarily through achieving specified purchase volume requirements, as outlined in their supply agreements with the Company, or in limited instances, for remaining a SpartanNash customer for a specified time period. These advances must be repaid if the purchase volume requirements are not met or if the retailer does not remain a customer for the specified time period. In the event these retailers are unable to repay these advances or otherwise experience an event of default, the Company may be unable to recover the unearned portion of the funds advanced to these independent retailers. The Company evaluates the recoverability of these advances based on a number of factors, including anticipated and historical purchase volume, the value of any collateral, customer financial statements and other economic and industry factors, and establishes a reserve for the advances as necessary. As of December 29, 2018, the Company has unearned advanced funds of approximately $85.3 million, and has established a reserve of $35.1 million for these advances.

Guarantees of Debt and Lease Obligations of Others. The Company may guarantee debt and lease obligations of independent retailers. In the event these retailers are unable to meet their debt service payments or otherwise experience an event of default, the Company would be unconditionally liable for the outstanding balance of their debt and lease obligations, which would be due in accordance with the underlying agreements.

The Company has guaranteed the outstanding lease obligations of certain independent retailers and bank debt for one retailer.retailers. These guarantees, which are secured by certain business assets and personal guarantees of the respective independent retailers, represent the maximum undiscounted payments the Company would be required to make in the event of default. The Company believes these independent retailers will be able to perform under the lease agreements and that no payments will be required, and no loss will be incurred under the guarantees. A liability representing the fair value of the obligations assumed under the guarantees is included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The Company also subleases and assigns various leases to third parties. In circumstances when the Company becomes aware of factors that indicate deterioration in a third party’s ability to meet its financial obligations guaranteed or assigned by SpartanNash, the Company records a specific reserve in the amount the Company reasonably believes it will be obligated to pay on the third party’s behalf, net of any anticipated recoveries from the third party. In determining the adequacy of these reserves, the Company analyzes factors such as those described above in “Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – Methodology” and “Lease Commitments.” It is possible that the accuracy of the estimation process could be materially affected by different judgments as to the obligations based on information considered and further deterioration of accounts, with the potential for a corresponding adverse effect on operating results and cash flows. Triggering these guarantees or obligations under assigned leases would not, however, result in cross default of the Company’s debt, but could restrict resources available for general business initiatives. Refer to Part II, Item 8Note 15, Concentration of this report under Note 14Credit Risk, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for moreadditional information regarding customer exposure and credit risk.

-35-Business Combinations

The Company accounts for acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting, which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date, with any excess purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired being recorded as goodwill.

-32-


 

 

Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of intangible assets and in assigning their respective useful lives. The fair value estimates are based on available historical information and on future expectations and assumptions deemed reasonable by the Company but are inherently uncertain. Also, determining the estimated useful life of an intangible asset requires judgment based on the Company’s expected use of the asset, as different types of intangible assets will have different useful lives and certain assets may even be considered to have indefinite useful lives. The Company typically utilizes the income method to estimate the fair value of intangible assets, which discounts the projected future cash flows attributable to the respective assets. Significant estimates and assumptions inherent in the valuation reflect a consideration of other marketplace competition and include the amount and timing of future cash flows (including expected growth rates and profitability) and the discount rate applied to the cash flows. Unanticipated market or macroeconomic events and circumstances may occur that could affect the accuracy or validity of the estimates and assumptions.

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis (during the last quarter of the fiscal year), or whenever events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For purposes of its goodwill impairment testing, theThe Company maintainshas three reporting units, which are the same as the Company’s reportingreportable segments; however, there is no goodwill currently existsrecorded within the Retail or Military segment.segments. Fair values are determined based on the discounted cash flows and comparable market values of each reporting segment. If thea reporting unit’s fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the fair value of the implied goodwill is calculated as the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities, excluding goodwill. Anan impairment charge is recordedrecognized for any excess ofthe amount by which the carrying value overexceeds the impliedreporting unit’s fair value.value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The Company’s goodwill impairment analysis also includes a comparison of the aggregate estimated fair value of each reporting unit to the Company’s total market capitalization. Therefore, a significant and sustained decline in the Company’s stock price could result in goodwill impairment charges. During times of financial market volatility, significant judgment is given to determine the underlying cause of the decline and whether stock price declines are short-term in nature or indicative of an event or change in circumstances. When testing goodwill for impairment, the Company’s corporate-owned retail stores represent components of its Retail segment. Stores have been aggregated and deemed a single reporting unit as they have similar economic characteristics.

Determining market values using a discounted cash flow method requires that the Company make significant estimates and assumptions, including long-term projections of cash flows, market conditions and appropriate discount rates. The Company’s judgments are based on the perspective of a market participant, historical experience, current market trends and other information. In estimating future cash flows, the Company utilizes internally generated three-year forecasts for sales and operating profits, including capital expenditures, and a 3.0% long-term assumed growth rate of cash flows for periods after the three-year forecast for both the Food Distribution and Retail segments.forecast. The future estimated cash flows wereare discounted using a ratebased upon the reporting unit’s weighted average cost of 10.3% and 9.6%capital, which was 11.9% for the Food Distribution reporting unit. The determination of the weighted average cost of capital incorporates current interest rates, equity risk premiums, and Retail segments, respectively.other market-based expectations regarding expected investment returns. The Company generally develops its forecasts based on recent sales data for existing operations and other factors. While the Company believes that the estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation methodology are reasonable, different assumptions could result in different outcomes.

Based on the Company’s annual review during the fiscal years ended January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 and the 39-week period ended December 28, no goodwill impairment charge was required to be recorded. As of the date of the most recent goodwill impairment test, which utilized data and assumptions as of October 6, 2018, the Food Distribution reporting unit had a fair value that was substantially in excess of its carrying value and the fair value of the Retail reporting unit, which was allocated $190.5 million of the total goodwill balance as of the assessment date, exceeded its carrying value by 6.8%. The fair value calculations contain significant judgments and estimates related to the Retail reporting unit’s projected weighted average cost of capital, future revenues and cash flows, and overall profitability. These judgments and estimates are impacted by a number of different factors, both internal and external, that could result in changes in the estimates and their related outcomes. Specifically, certain changes in economic, industry or market conditions, business operations, competition, or the Company’s performance could affect the estimates used in the fair value calculations.value. The Company has sufficient available information, both current and historical, to support its assumptions, judgments and estimates;estimates used in the goodwill impairment test; however, if actual results for the Food Distribution segment are not consistent with the Company’s estimates, it could result in the Company recording a significant non-cash impairment charge. From a sensitivity perspective, no goodwill impairment charge would be required for the Retail reporting unit even if the estimate of future discounted cash flow was 5% lower or if the discount rate increased by 30 basis points. If the Company’s stock price experiences a significant and sustained decline, or other events or changes in circumstances occur, such as operating results not meeting the Company’s estimates, indicating that impairment may have occurred, the Company would re-evaluate its goodwill for impairment.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Other Than Goodwill

Long-lived assets to be held and used are evaluated for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When the undiscounted future cash flows are not sufficient to recover an asset’s carrying amount, the fair value is compared to the carrying value to determine the impairment loss to be recorded. Long-lived assets are evaluated at the asset-group level, which is the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. Impairments of long-lived assets were $4.2$2.6 million, $7.6$33.7 million and $9.7$15.6 million for 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Estimates of future cash flows and expected sales prices are judgments based upon the fiscalCompany’s experience and knowledge of operations. These estimates project cash flows several years ended January 2, 2016into the future and January 3, 2015are affected by changes in the economy, the competitive environment, real estate market conditions and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.inflation.

Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell. Management determines fair values using independent appraisals, quotes or expected sales prices developed by internal real estate professionals. Estimates of expected sales prices are judgments based upon the Company’s experience, knowledge of market conditions and current offers received. Changes in market conditions, the economic environment and other factors, including the Company’s ability to effectively compete and react to competitor openings, can significantly impact these estimates. While the Company believes that the estimates and assumptions underlying the valuation methodology are reasonable, different assumptions could result in a different outcome.

-36--33-


 

 

Reserves for Closed Properties

The Company records reserves for closed properties that are subject to long-term lease commitments based upon the future minimum lease payments and related ancillary costs from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term, net of estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably expected to be obtained for the property. Future cash flows are based on contractual lease terms and knowledge of the geographic area in which the closed site is located. These estimates are subject to multiple factors, including inflation, ability to sublease the property and other economic conditions. Internally developed estimates of sublease rentals are based upon the geographic areas in which the properties are located, the results of previous efforts to sublease similar properties, and the current economic environment. Reserves may be adjusted in the future based upon the actual resolution of each of these factors. For any closed site reserves recorded as part of purchase accounting prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, adjustments that decrease the liability are generally recorded as a reduction of goodwill.factors At January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, reserves for closed properties for distribution center and store lease and ancillary costs totaling $14.4 million are recorded net of approximately $0.5 million of existing sublease rentals.total $16.4 million. Based upon the current economic environment, the Company does not believe that it will be ableis likely to obtain any additional sublease rentals. A 5% increase/decrease in future estimated ancillary costs would result in a $0.3$0.4 million increase/decrease in the restructuring charge liability.

Insurance Reserves

SpartanNash is primarily self-insured through self-insurance retentions or high deductible programs for workers’ compensation, general liability, and automobile liability, and is also self-insured for healthcare costs. Self-insurance liabilities are recorded based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Workers’ compensation, general liability and automobile liabilities are actuarially estimated based on available historical information on an undiscounted basis. The Company has purchased stop-loss coverage to limit its exposure on a per claim basis.basis for its self-insurance retentions and high deductible programs. On a per claim basis, the Company’s exposure is up to $0.5 million for workers’ compensation and general liability, and$1.0 million for automobile liability, and $0.5 million for healthcare per covered life per year. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to self-insurance reserves.

Any projection of losses concerning insurance reserves is subject to a degree of variability. Among the causes of variability are unpredictable external factors affecting future inflation rates, discount rates, litigation trends, changing regulations, legal interpretations, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns. Although the Company’s estimates of liabilities incurred do not anticipate significant changes in historical trends for these variables, such changes could have a material impact on future claim costs and currently recorded liabilities. The impact of many of these variables ismay be difficult to estimate.

PensionDefined Benefit Plans

Accounting for defined benefit pension plans involves estimating the cost of benefits to be provided in the future, based on vested years of service, and attributing those costs over the time period each employeeassociate works. The significant factors affecting the Company’s pension costs are the fair values of plan assets and the selections of management’s key assumptions, including the expected return on plan assets and the discount rate used by the Company’s actuary to calculate its liability. The Company considers current market conditions, including changes in interest rates and investment returns, in selecting these assumptions. The discount rate is based on current investment yields on high quality fixed-income investments and projected cash flow obligations. Expected return on plan assets is based on projected returns by asset class on broad, publicly traded equity and fixed-income indices, as well as the Company’s target asset allocation, which is designed to meet the Company’s long-term pension requirements. While the Company believes the assumptions selected are reasonable, significant differences in its actual experience, plan amendments or significant changes in the fair value of its plan assets may materially affect its pension obligations and its future expense. A 75 basis point increase/decrease

Sensitivities to changes in the expected return on plan assets would have decreased/increased net periodic pension income by approximately $0.7 millionmajor assumptions for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016. SpartanNash Company Pension Plan and the SpartanNash Company Retiree Medical Plan as of December 29, 2018, are as follows:

Percentage

Projected

2019

Point

Benefit Obligation

Expense

(In millions, except percentages)

Change

Decrease / (Increase)

Decrease / (Increase)

Expected return on plan assets - SpartanNash Company Pension Plan

+/- 0.75

N/A

$0.3 / $(0.3)

Discount rate - SpartanNash Company Pension Plan

+/- 0.75

$3.2 / $(3.6)

N/A

Discount rate - SpartanNash Company Retiree Medical Plan

+/- 0.75

$0.7 / $(0.9)

N/A

Refer to Note 1011, Associate Retirement Plans, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for furtheradditional information related to the assumptions used to estimate the cost of benefits and for details related to changes in the funded status of the defined benefit pension plans.

-34-


Income Taxes

SpartanNash is subject to periodic audits by the Internal Revenue Service and other state and local taxing authorities. These audits may challenge certain of the Company’s tax positions, such as the timing and amount of income credits and deductions and the allocation of taxable income to various tax jurisdictions. The Company evaluates its tax positions and establishes liabilities in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance on uncertainty in income taxes. These tax uncertainties are reviewed as facts and circumstances change and are adjusted accordingly. This requires significant management judgment in estimating final outcomes. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates and could significantly affect the Company’s effective income tax rate and cash flows in future years. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which it expects the differences to reverse. Refer to Note 1213, Income Tax, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8 of this report, providesfor additional information on income taxes.

-37-


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow Information

The following table summarizes the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended January 2, 20162018, 2017 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013. For comparability purposes, the Company has also provided a summarized consolidated statement of cash flows for the 51 weeks ended December 28, 2013:

2016:

Year Ended

 

 

Period Ended

 

January 2,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

December 28,

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2013

 

 

2013

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(51 Weeks)

 

 

(39 weeks)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

 

219,489

 

 

$

 

139,073

 

 

$

 

97,055

 

 

$

 

64,761

 

$

 

171,658

 

 

$

 

52,843

 

 

$

 

157,191

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(95,300

)

 

 

 

(81,687

)

 

 

 

(65,602

)

 

 

 

(57,170

)

 

 

(64,156

)

 

 

 

(315,393

)

 

 

 

(68,227

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(107,696

)

 

 

 

(59,962

)

 

 

 

(30,676

)

 

 

 

(4,051

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(104,300

)

 

 

 

254,003

 

 

 

 

(86,594

)

Net cash used in discontinued operations

 

 

(217

)

 

 

 

(197

)

 

 

 

(521

)

 

 

 

(421

)

 

 

(284

)

 

 

 

(137

)

 

 

 

(738

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

16,276

 

 

 

 

(2,773

)

 

 

 

256

 

 

 

 

3,119

 

 

 

2,918

 

 

 

 

(8,684

)

 

 

 

1,632

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

6,443

 

 

 

 

9,216

 

 

 

 

8,960

 

 

 

 

6,097

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

 

22,719

 

 

$

 

6,443

 

 

$

 

9,216

 

 

$

 

9,216

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

15,667

 

 

 

 

24,351

 

 

 

 

22,719

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$

 

18,585

 

 

$

 

15,667

 

 

$

 

24,351

 

Net cash provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities increased during the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016 over the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015for 2018 compared to 2017 by approximately $80.4 million. The increase was$118.8 million primarily due to changes inlower working capital which were largely the result ofrequirements, particularly inventory management initiatives and the timing of payments inaccounts receivable, compared to the prior year.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased during the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 over the comparable 51 week fiscal year ended December 28, 2013decreased for 2017 versus 2016 by approximately $42.0$104.3 million. This increaseThe change was primarily due primarily to the impacttiming of the mergerworking capital requirements, particularly higher accounts receivable and inventory balances associated with Nash-Finch.  

Net cash provided by operating activities increased during the 53 week fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 over the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 by $74.3 million. This increase was due primarilynew distribution business and incremental sales to certain high-growth distribution customers. The timing of year-end payments impacting accounts payable balances also contributed to the impact ofchange in cash flows, which was partly offset by lower customer advances compared to the merger with Nash-Finch and an additional 14 weeks of operations.  2016.

During the fiscal years ended January 2,2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015, and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, the Company paid $23.5made $0.1 million, $27.4$10.7 million and $14.0$35.8 million, respectively, in net income tax payments.

Net cash used in investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities increased $13.6decreased $251.2 million in the fiscal year ended January 2, 20162018 compared to the fiscal year ended January 3, 20152017 primarily due to $41.5 million of payments for acquisitions, partially offset by $10.6 million of decreased payments for capital expenditure activitythe Caito and an increase of $9.9 millionBRT acquisition made in proceeds on the sales of assets of previously closed facilities.prior year.

Net cash used in investing activities increased $16.1$247.2 million in the fiscal year ended January 3, 20152017 compared to the 51-week period ended December 28, 20132016 primarily due to cash payments for capital expenditures, which increased $44.7 million, partially offset by a decreasethe Caito and BRT acquisition made in cash paid for acquisitions of $20.6 million and an increase in proceeds from the sale of assets of $9.7 million.

Net cash used in investing activities increased $24.5 million in the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 compared to the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 primarily due to capital expenditures which increased $52.8 million, a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions of $20.6 million and an increase in proceeds from the sales of assets of $9.7 million.2017

The Military, Food Distribution, Military and Retail segments utilized 4.8%46.6%, 22.6%4.9% and 72.6%48.5% of capital expenditures, respectively, for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016.2018. Expenditures for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016 were2018 primarily related to seven major retail store remodels and many other retailupgrades, which include five store upgrades.remodels, various equipment purchases, and IT system upgrades and implementations to better streamline processes and meet the operational and supply chain needs of the Company. The Company expects capital expenditures to range from $72.0$85.0 million to $75.0$93.0 million for fiscal 2016.2019.

Net cash used in(used in) provided by financing activities. Net cash used in financing activities increased $47.7$358.3 million during the fiscal year ended January 2, 20162018 over the fiscal year ended January 3, 20152017 primarily due to borrowings on the $50.0 million prepayment ofrevolving credit facility in the Senior Notes.  prior year to fund the acquisition and working capital, as well as increases in cash provided by operating activities which were used to pay down debt in the current year.

-38-Net cash provided by financing activities increased $340.6 million during 2017 over 2016 primarily due to borrowings on the revolving credit facility to fund the Caito and BRT acquisition and timing of working capital requirements, partially offset by a $26.0 million increase in cash used for the repurchase of common stock.

-35-


 

 

Net cash used in financing activities during the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 increased $29.3 million compared to the 51-week period ended December 28, 2013 primarily as a result of an increase in net payments on borrowings of $23.6 million, an increase in dividends paid of $10.4 million and share repurchases of $5.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in financing fees paid of $8.6 million.  

The increase in cash used in financing activities in the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 compared to the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 was primarily due to an increase in net payments on borrowings of $48.6 million, an increase of dividends paid of $12.2 million and share repurchases of $5.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in financing fees paid of $8.6 million. The increase in dividends paid was due to an increase in the number of shares outstanding due to the merger with Nash-Finch as well as an increase in the dividend rate.

Net cash used in discontinued operations. Net cash used in discontinued operations contains the net cash flows of the Company’s Retail and Food Distribution and Retail discontinued operations as well as otherand is primarily composed of facility maintenance expenditures.

Debt Management

Total debt, including capital lease obligations and current maturities, decreased $75.3$51.9 million to $495.0$698.1 million as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 from $570.3$750.0 million at January 3, 2015.December 30, 2017. The decrease resulted primarily fromin total debt was driven by principal payments in the prepayment of $50.0 million of Senior Notes and net payments on the revolving credit facility. Oncurrent year due to an increase in cash provided by operations.

In December 15, 2015, the Company redeemed all of the outstanding $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 6.625% Senior Notes due December 2016 at a cash redemption price of 101.65625% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company redeemed the Notes for cash using borrowings under its revolving credit facility. A loss on debt extinguishment of $1.2 million was incurred consisting of the redemption premium and the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs. As a result of the redemption, the Company expects to reduce annual interest expense by approximately $2.0 million, assuming no future interest rate increases.  

In January 2015,2018, SpartanNash Company and certain of its subsidiaries amended its secured revolving credit facility.entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”). The principal changes of the amendment were to reduce the Base and Eurodollar interest rates by 0.25% and to extendincluded an extension of the maturity date of the agreement, which was setloans from December 20, 2021 to expire on November 19, 2018,December 18, 2023, the ability to January 9, 2020.increase the size of the Tranche A revolving loan to $975 million from $900 million, an amendment to the interest rate grid such that rates for the Tranche A-1 revolving loans are now LIBOR plus 2.25% to LIBOR plus 2.50%, a reload of the $60 million Tranche A-2 term loan and a reset of certain advance rates for the borrowing base. The amended credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”)Credit Agreement provides for borrowings of $1.0$1.1 billion, consisting of three tranches: a $900$975 million secured revolving credit facility (Tranche A);, a $40 million secured revolving credit facility (Tranche A-1);, and a $60 million term loan (Tranche A-2). The Company has the ability to increase the size of the Credit Agreement by an additional $400$325 million, subject to certain conditions in the Credit Agreement. The Company’s obligations under the related Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the Company’s personal and real property. The Company may repay all loans in whole or in part at any time without penalty.

Liquidity

The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from operations and its senior secured credit facility, which has maximum available credit of $1.0 billion.facility. As of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the senior secured revolving credit facility and senior secured term loan had outstanding borrowings of $429.8$660.9 million. Additional available borrowings under the Company’s $1.0$1.1 billion credit facilityCredit Agreement are based on stipulated advance rates on eligible assets, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The credit agreementCredit Agreement requires that the Company maintains excess availabilityExcess Availability of 10% of the borrowing base, as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement. The Company had excess availability after the 10% covenantrequirement of $334.3$262.0 million at January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018. Payment of dividends and repurchases of outstanding shares are permitted, provided that certain levels of excess availability are maintained. The credit facility provides for the issuance of letters of credit, of which $11.1$11.7 million were outstanding as of January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018. The revolving credit facility matures January 2020,December 18, 2023 and is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Company believes that cash generated from operating activities and available borrowings under the credit facilityCredit Agreement will be sufficient to meet anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, dividend payments, and debt service obligations for the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that the business will continue to generate cash flow at or above current levels or that the Company will maintain its ability to borrow under the credit facility.Credit Agreement.

The Company’s current ratio (current assets to current liabilities) was 1.81:1.002.10:1 at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 compared to 2.00:1.002.03:1 at January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, and its investment in working capital was $396.3$524.6 million at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 compared to $455.7$509.7 million at January 3, 2015.December 30, 2017. Net debt to total capital ratio decreased to 0.37:1.000.49:1 at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 from 0.43:1.000.50:1 at January 3, 2015.

December 30, 2017. Total net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as long-term debt and capital lease obligations, plus current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations, less cash and cash equivalents. The Company believes both management and its investors find the information useful because it reflects the amount of long-term debt obligations that are not covered by available cash and temporary investments. Total net debt is not a substitute for GAAP financial measures and may differ from similarly titled measures of other companies.

-39-


Following is a reconciliation of long-term debt and capital lease obligations to total net long-term debt and capital lease obligations as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015.December 30, 2017.

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations

$

 

18,263

 

 

$

 

9,196

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

679,797

 

 

 

 

740,755

 

Total debt

 

 

698,060

 

 

 

 

749,951

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(18,585

)

 

 

 

(15,667

)

Total net long-term debt

$

 

679,475

 

 

$

 

734,284

 

-36-


 

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations

$

 

19,003

 

 

$

 

19,758

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

475,978

 

 

 

 

550,510

 

Total debt

 

 

494,981

 

 

 

 

570,268

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(22,719

)

 

 

 

(6,443

)

Total net long-term debt

$

 

472,262

 

 

$

 

563,825

 

Contractual Obligations

The table below presents the Company’s significant contractual obligations as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 (1)(a):

Amount Committed By Period

 

Amount Committed By Period

 

Total

 

 

Less

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More

 

Total

 

 

Less

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More

 

Amount

 

 

than 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

than 5

 

Amount

 

 

than 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

than 5

 

(In thousands)

Committed

 

 

year

 

 

1-3 years

 

 

3-5 years

 

 

years

 

Committed

 

 

year

 

 

1-3 years

 

 

3-5 years

 

 

years

 

Long-term debt (2)(b)

$

 

436,382

 

 

$

 

11,532

 

 

$

 

24,176

 

 

$

 

400,674

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

665,299

 

 

$

 

11,423

 

 

$

 

22,059

 

 

$

 

631,675

 

 

$

 

142

 

Estimated interest on long-term debt

 

 

35,859

 

 

 

 

9,789

 

 

 

 

17,704

 

 

 

 

8,366

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56,515

 

 

 

 

12,542

 

 

 

 

23,255

 

 

 

 

20,717

 

 

 

 

1

 

Capital leases (3)(c)

 

 

58,599

 

 

 

 

7,471

 

 

 

 

14,961

 

 

 

 

11,483

 

 

 

 

24,684

 

 

 

39,558

 

 

 

 

6,840

 

 

 

 

8,421

 

 

 

 

5,225

 

 

 

 

19,072

 

Interest on capital lease

 

 

26,996

 

 

 

 

4,293

 

 

 

 

6,948

 

 

 

 

4,888

 

 

 

 

10,867

 

Interest on capital leases

 

 

15,708

 

 

 

 

2,251

 

 

 

 

4,005

 

 

 

 

3,372

 

 

 

 

6,080

 

Operating leases (3)(c)

 

 

262,336

 

 

 

 

52,252

 

 

 

 

84,178

 

 

 

 

51,333

 

 

 

 

74,573

 

 

 

278,063

 

 

 

 

55,137

 

 

 

 

88,610

 

 

 

 

58,543

 

 

 

 

75,773

 

Lease and ancillary costs of closed sites, including imputed interest

 

 

14,448

 

 

 

 

3,698

 

 

 

 

3,597

 

 

 

 

1,897

 

 

 

 

5,256

 

Lease and ancillary costs of closed sites, undiscounted

 

 

18,740

 

 

 

4,056

 

 

 

5,565

 

 

 

4,400

 

 

 

4,719

 

Purchase obligations (merchandise) (4)(d)

 

 

33,779

 

 

 

 

15,160

 

 

 

 

8,571

 

 

 

 

4,251

 

 

 

 

5,797

 

 

 

80,452

 

 

 

 

42,574

 

 

 

 

31,895

 

 

 

 

4,199

 

 

 

 

1,784

 

Unrecognized tax liabilities, including interest

 

 

2,323

 

 

 

 

788

 

 

 

 

1,375

 

 

 

 

160

 

 

 

 

 

Self-insurance liability

 

 

14,466

 

 

 

 

8,237

 

 

 

 

3,860

 

 

 

 

1,605

 

 

 

 

764

 

 

 

14,291

 

 

 

 

8,608

 

 

 

 

3,804

 

 

 

 

1,208

 

 

 

 

671

 

Total

$

 

885,188

 

 

$

 

113,220

 

 

$

 

165,370

 

 

$

 

484,657

 

 

$

 

121,941

 

$

 

1,168,626

 

 

$

 

143,431

 

 

$

 

187,614

 

 

$

 

729,339

 

 

$

 

108,242

 

(1)  (a)

Excludes funding of pension and other postretirement benefit obligations. The Company does not expectexpects to make paymentscontributions to its defined benefit pension plans in fiscal 2016.2019, as necessary, to fund the distributions in connection with the termination of the Plan described within Note 11, Associate Retirement Plans. Also excludes contributions under various multi-employer pension and health and welfare plans, which totaled $12.9totals $13.3 million and $13.8 million, respectively, for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018. For additional information, refer to Note 1011, Associate Retirement Plans, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Also excludes unrecognized tax liabilities, as the Company cannot reasonably estimate the timing of potential cash settlement. For additional information, refer to Note 13, Income Tax, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

(2)  (b)

Refer to Note 67, Long-Term Debt, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding long-term debt.information.

(3)  (c)

Operating and capital lease obligations do not include common area maintenance, insurance or tax payments for which the Company is also obligated. For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016, these chargesThese costs totaled approximately $16.7 million.$15.4 million in 2018.

(4)  (d)

The amount of purchase obligations shown in this table represents the amount of product the Company is contractually obligated to purchase in order to earn $10.2$11.8 million in advanced contract monies that are receivable under the contracts. At January 2, 2016, $2.6December 29, 2018, $3.0 million in advanced contract monies has been received under these contracts where recognition has been deferred on the consolidated balance sheet. If the Company does not fulfill these purchase obligations, it would only be obligated to repay the unearned upfront contract monies. The amount shown here does not include the following: a) purchase obligations made in the normal course of business as those obligations involve purchase orders based on current Company needs that are typically cancelable and/or fulfilled by vendors within a very short period of time; b) agreements that are cancelable by the Company without significant penalty, including contracts for routine outsourced services; and c) contracts that do not contain minimum annual purchase commitments but include other standard contractual considerations that must be fulfilled in order to earn advanced contract monies that have been received.

-40-


The Company has also made certain commercial commitments that extend beyond January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018. These commitments include standby letters of credit and guarantees of certain Food Distribution customer lease obligations. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, and Note 15, Concentration of Credit Risk, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding lease guarantees and assigned leases. The following summarizes these commitments as of January 2, 2016:December 29, 2018:

Amount Committed By Period

 

Amount Committed By Period

 

Total

 

 

Less

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More

 

Total

 

 

Less

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More

 

Amount

 

 

than 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

than 5

 

Amount

 

 

than 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

than 5

 

(In thousands)

Committed

 

 

year

 

 

1-3 years

 

 

3-5 years

 

 

years

 

Committed

 

 

year

 

 

1-3 years

 

 

3-5 years

 

 

years

 

Standby Letters of Credit (1)(a)

$

 

11,069

 

 

$

 

11,069

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

11,703

 

 

$

 

11,703

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

Guarantees (2)

 

 

2,666

 

 

 

 

453

 

 

 

 

906

 

 

 

 

677

 

 

 

 

630

 

Total Other Commercial Commitments

$

 

13,735

 

 

$

 

11,522

 

 

$

 

906

 

 

$

 

677

 

 

$

 

630

 

(1)  (a)

Letters of credit supportsprimarily support the Company’s self- insuranceself-insurance obligations.

(2)

Refer to Part II, Item 8 of this report under Note 14 in the notes to consolidated financial statements and under the caption “Guarantees of Debt and Lease Obligations of Others” in the Critical Accounting Policies section for additional information regarding debt guarantees, lease guarantees and assigned leases. The amount shown here includes interest.

-37-


Cash Dividends

The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.135$0.18, $0.165 and $0.12$0.15 per common share in each quarter of the fiscal years ended January 2,2018, 2017, and 2016, and January 3, 2015, respectively, and $0.09 in each quarter of the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013.respectively. Under the senior revolving credit facility,Credit Agreement, the Company is generally permitted to pay dividends in any fiscal year up to an amount such that all cash dividends, together with any cash distributions prepayments of the senior notes and share repurchases, do not exceed $25.0$35.0 million. Additionally, the Company is generally permitted to pay cash dividends in excess of $25.0$35.0 million in any fiscal year so long as its Excess Availability, as defined in the senior revolving credit facility,Credit Agreement, is in excess of 10% of the Total Borrowing Base, as defined in the Credit Agreement, before and after giving effect to the prepayments, repurchases and dividends. Although the Company currently expects to continue to pay a quarterly cash dividend, adoption of a dividend policy does not commit the Board of Directors (the “Board”) to declare future dividends. Each future dividend will be considered and declared by the Board of Directors at its discretion. Whether the Board of Directors continues to declare dividends depends on a number of factors, including the Company’s future financial condition, anticipated profitability and cash flows and compliance with the terms of its credit facilities.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation, in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information.additional information related to recently adopted accounting standards, as well as the anticipated effect of any impending accounting standards.

Item 7A.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to industry related price changes on several commodities, such as dairy, meat and produce that it buys and sells in all of its segments. These products are purchased for and sold from inventory in the ordinary course of business. The Company is also exposed to other general commodity price changes such as utilities, insurance and fuel costs.

The Company had $429.8$660.9 million of variable rate debt as of January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding debt including loan fee amortizationoutstanding for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 was 3.90%4.08%.

At January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, the estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including current maturities, was higher than book value by approximately $2.1$1.0 million and $3.7$1.6 million, respectively. The estimated fair values were based on market quotes for instruments with similar instruments.terms and remaining maturities.

-41-


The following table sets forth the future principal cash flowspayments of the Company’s outstanding debt and related weighted average interest rates for the outstanding instruments as of January 2, 2016:December 29, 2018:

January 2, 2016

 

 

Aggregate Payments by Fiscal Year

 

December 29, 2018

 

 

Aggregate Payments by Year

 

(In thousands, except rates)

Fair Value

 

 

Total

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

Thereafter

 

Fair Value

 

 

Total

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

Thereafter

 

Fixed rate debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate debt

 

Principal payable

$

 

67,292

 

 

$

 

65,157

 

 

$

 

9,003

 

 

$

 

8,906

 

 

$

 

10,231

 

 

$

 

7,537

 

 

$

 

4,796

 

 

$

 

24,684

 

$

 

45,023

 

 

$

 

44,005

 

 

$

 

8,263

 

 

$

 

6,569

 

 

$

 

3,911

 

 

$

 

3,341

 

 

$

 

2,707

 

 

$

 

19,214

 

Average interest rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.88

%

 

 

6.96

%

 

 

7.13

%

 

 

7.59

%

 

 

7.92

%

 

 

 

8.17

%

 

 

8.49

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.91

%

 

 

 

7.30

%

 

 

 

7.60

%

 

 

 

7.77

%

 

 

 

7.90

%

 

 

 

8.41

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate debt

 

Principal payable

$

 

429,824

 

 

$

 

429,824

 

 

$

 

10,000

 

 

$

 

10,000

 

 

$

 

10,000

 

 

$

 

4,842

 

 

$

 

394,982

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

660,852

 

 

$

 

660,852

 

 

$

 

10,000

 

 

$

 

10,000

 

 

$

 

10,000

 

 

$

 

10,000

 

 

$

 

620,852

 

 

$

 

 

Average interest rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.30

%

 

 

2.26

%

 

 

2.18

%

 

 

2.09

%

 

 

2.02

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.27

%

 

 

 

4.22

%

 

 

 

4.17

%

 

 

 

4.11

%

 

 

 

4.02

%

 

 

N/A

 

 

-42--38-


 

 

Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

SpartanNash Company and Subsidiaries

Grand Rapids, Michigan

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SpartanNash Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015, andDecember 30, 2017, the related consolidated statements of earnings,operations, comprehensive income shareholders’(loss), shareholders' equity, and cash flows, for the fiscal years ended January 2,December 29, 2018, December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and January 3, 2015 and the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013. These consolidated financial statements arerelated notes (collectively referred to as the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)“financial statements”). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidatedthe financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SpartanNashthe Company and subsidiaries as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the fiscal years ended January 2,December 29, 2018, December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and January 3, 2015 and the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 2, 2016February 27, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan

March 2, 2016February 27, 2019

We have served as the Company’s auditor since at least 1970; however, an earlier year could not be reliably determined.

 

 

 

-43--39-


 

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

SpartanNash Company and Subsidiaries

(In thousands) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

 

22,719

 

 

$

 

6,443

 

$

 

18,585

 

 

$

 

15,667

 

Accounts and notes receivable, net

 

 

317,183

 

 

 

 

282,697

 

 

 

346,260

 

 

 

 

344,057

 

Inventories, net

 

 

521,164

 

 

 

 

577,197

 

 

 

553,799

 

 

 

 

597,162

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

22,521

 

 

 

 

31,882

 

 

 

73,798

 

 

 

 

47,400

 

Property and equipment held for sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,180

 

 

 

8,654

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

 

883,587

 

 

 

 

913,399

 

 

 

1,001,096

 

 

 

 

1,004,286

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

579,060

 

 

 

 

600,240

 

Land and improvements

 

 

73,524

 

 

 

 

76,218

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

483,764

 

 

 

 

468,236

 

Equipment

 

 

502,283

 

 

 

 

453,339

 

Total property and equipment

 

 

1,059,571

 

 

 

 

997,793

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

475,873

 

 

 

 

400,643

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

583,698

 

 

 

 

597,150

 

Goodwill

 

 

322,902

 

 

 

 

297,280

 

 

 

178,648

 

 

 

 

178,648

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

128,926

 

 

 

 

134,430

 

Other assets, net

 

 

135,261

 

 

 

 

124,453

 

 

 

84,182

 

 

 

 

138,193

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

$

 

1,925,448

 

 

$

 

1,932,282

 

$

 

1,971,912

 

 

$

 

2,055,797

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

$

 

353,688

 

 

$

 

320,037

 

$

 

357,802

 

 

$

 

376,977

 

Accrued payroll and benefits

 

 

71,973

 

 

 

 

73,220

 

 

 

57,180

 

 

 

 

65,156

 

Other accrued expenses

 

 

42,660

 

 

 

 

44,690

 

 

 

43,206

 

 

 

 

43,252

 

Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

19,003

 

 

 

 

19,758

 

 

 

18,263

 

 

 

 

9,196

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

487,324

 

 

 

 

457,705

 

 

 

476,451

 

 

 

 

494,581

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes (Note 1)

 

 

116,600

 

 

 

 

113,726

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

49,254

 

 

 

 

42,050

 

Postretirement benefits

 

 

16,008

 

 

 

 

23,701

 

 

 

15,016

 

 

 

 

15,687

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

38,759

 

 

 

 

39,387

 

 

 

35,447

 

 

 

 

40,774

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

475,978

 

 

 

 

550,510

 

 

 

679,797

 

 

 

 

740,755

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

 

647,345

 

 

 

 

727,324

 

 

 

779,514

 

 

 

 

839,266

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, voting, no par value; 100,000 shares

authorized; 37,600 and 37,524 shares outstanding

 

 

521,698

 

 

 

 

520,791

 

Common stock, voting, no par value; 100,000 shares

authorized; 35,952 and 36,466 shares outstanding

 

 

484,064

 

 

 

 

497,093

 

Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(11,447

)

 

 

 

(11,655

)

 

 

(15,759

)

 

 

 

(15,136

)

Retained earnings

 

 

280,528

 

 

 

 

238,117

 

 

 

247,642

 

 

 

 

239,993

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

 

790,779

 

 

 

 

747,253

 

 

 

715,947

 

 

 

 

721,950

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$

 

1,925,448

 

 

$

 

1,932,282

 

$

 

1,971,912

 

 

$

 

2,055,797

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

-44--40-


 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGSOPERATIONS

SpartanNash Company and Subsidiaries

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

Year Ended

 

 

Period Ended

 

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

(52 weeks)

 

 

(53 weeks)

 

 

(39 weeks)

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Net sales

$

 

7,651,973

 

 

$

 

7,916,062

 

 

$

 

2,597,230

 

$

 

8,064,552

 

 

$

 

7,963,799

 

 

$

 

7,561,084

 

 

Cost of sales

 

 

6,536,291

 

 

 

 

6,759,988

 

 

 

 

2,110,350

 

 

 

6,954,146

 

 

 

 

6,818,890

 

 

 

 

6,449,590

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,115,682

 

 

 

 

1,156,074

 

 

 

 

486,880

 

 

 

1,110,406

 

 

 

 

1,144,909

 

 

 

 

1,111,494

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

975,572

 

 

 

 

1,022,387

 

 

 

 

433,450

 

 

 

997,411

 

 

 

 

1,015,024

 

 

 

 

963,235

 

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

8,433

 

 

 

 

12,675

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

8,802

 

 

 

 

6,166

 

 

 

 

15,644

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

4,937

 

 

 

 

8,101

 

 

 

 

6,959

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

189,027

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges

 

 

37,546

 

 

 

 

39,432

 

 

 

 

32,116

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

992,807

 

 

 

 

1,041,228

 

 

 

 

470,087

 

 

 

1,039,894

 

 

 

 

1,251,584

 

 

 

 

1,002,310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings

 

 

122,875

 

 

 

 

114,846

 

 

 

 

16,793

 

Operating earnings (loss)

 

 

70,512

 

 

 

 

(106,675

)

 

 

 

109,184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other (income) and expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

21,820

 

 

 

 

24,414

 

 

 

 

9,219

 

 

 

30,483

 

 

 

 

25,343

 

 

 

 

19,082

 

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

1,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,527

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

413

 

 

 

 

247

 

 

Other, net

 

 

(375

)

 

 

 

(17

)

 

 

 

(23

)

 

 

(669

)

 

 

 

(787

)

 

 

 

(108

)

 

Total other expenses, net

 

 

22,616

 

 

 

 

24,397

 

 

 

 

14,723

 

 

 

29,814

 

 

 

 

24,969

 

 

 

 

19,221

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

 

100,259

 

 

 

 

90,449

 

 

 

 

2,070

 

Income taxes

 

 

37,093

 

 

 

 

31,329

 

 

 

 

841

 

Earnings from continuing operations

 

 

63,166

 

 

 

 

59,120

 

 

 

 

1,229

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

 

40,698

 

 

 

 

(131,644

)

 

 

 

89,963

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

6,907

 

 

 

 

(79,027

)

 

 

 

32,907

 

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

33,791

 

 

 

 

(52,617

)

 

 

 

57,056

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

(456

)

 

 

 

(524

)

 

 

 

(488

)

 

 

(219

)

 

 

 

(228

)

 

 

 

(228

)

 

Net earnings

$

 

62,710

 

 

$

 

58,596

 

 

$

 

741

 

Net earnings (loss)

$

 

33,572

 

 

$

 

(52,845

)

 

$

 

56,828

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings from continuing operations

$

 

1.68

 

 

$

 

1.57

 

 

$

 

0.05

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

$

 

0.94

 

 

$

 

(1.41

)

 

$

 

1.52

 

 

Loss from discontinued operations

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

 

(0.02

)

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

*

Net earnings

$

 

1.67

 

 

$

 

1.56

 

 

$

 

0.03

 

Net earnings (loss)

$

 

0.93

 

 

$

 

(1.41

)

 

$

 

1.52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings from continuing operations

$

 

1.67

 

 

$

 

1.57

 

 

$

 

0.05

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

$

 

0.94

 

 

$

 

(1.41

)

 

$

 

1.52

 

 

Loss from discontinued operations

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

 

(0.02

)

*

 

 

(0.02

)

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

(0.01

)

 

Net earnings

$

 

1.66

 

 

$

 

1.55

 

 

$

 

0.03

 

Net earnings (loss)

$

 

0.93

 

 

$

 

(1.41

)

 

$

 

1.51

 

 

*Includes rounding.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

-45--41-


 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

SpartanNash Company and Subsidiaries

(In thousands)

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Period Ended

 

 

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

 

(52 weeks)

 

 

(53 weeks)

 

 

(39 weeks)

 

Net earnings

$

 

62,710

 

 

$

 

58,596

 

 

$

 

741

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement liability adjustment

 

 

429

 

 

 

 

(4,785

)

 

 

 

8,316

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), before tax

 

 

429

 

 

 

 

(4,785

)

 

 

 

8,316

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income

 

 

(221

)

 

 

 

1,924

 

 

 

 

(3,423

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), after tax

 

 

208

 

 

 

 

(2,861

)

 

 

 

4,893

 

Comprehensive income

$

 

62,918

 

 

$

 

55,735

 

 

$

 

5,634

 

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net earnings (loss)

$

 

33,572

 

 

$

 

(52,845

)

 

$

 

56,828

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement liability adjustment

 

 

(822

)

 

 

 

(1,649

)

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive income

 

 

199

 

 

 

 

632

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income, after tax

 

 

(623

)

 

 

 

(1,017

)

 

 

 

10

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

$

 

32,949

 

 

$

 

(53,862

)

 

$

 

56,838

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

-46--42-


 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

SpartanNash Company and Subsidiaries

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Common

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Retained

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Stock

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

Earnings

 

 

Total

 

Balance at March 30, 2013

 

21,751

 

 

$

 

146,564

 

 

$

 

(13,687

)

 

$

 

202,778

 

 

$

 

335,655

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

 

741

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,893

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,893

 

Dividends - $0.27 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,908

)

 

 

 

(5,908

)

Stock-based employee compensation

 

 

 

 

 

6,951

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,951

 

Issuance of common stock and related tax benefit

     on stock option exercises and stock bonus plan

 

29

 

 

 

 

(111

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(111

)

Issuances of common stock for merger transaction

 

16,047

 

 

 

 

379,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

379,600

 

Issuance of restricted stock and related income

     tax benefits

 

228

 

 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15

)

Cancellations of restricted stock

 

(684

)

 

 

 

(14,933

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,933

)

Balance at December 28, 2013

 

37,371

 

 

 

 

518,056

 

 

 

 

(8,794

)

 

 

 

197,611

 

 

 

 

706,873

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,596

 

 

 

 

58,596

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,861

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,861

)

Dividends - $0.48 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18,090

)

 

 

 

(18,090

)

Share repurchase

 

(246

)

 

 

 

(4,987

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,987

)

Stock-based employee compensation

 

 

 

 

 

6,939

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,939

 

Issuance of common stock and related tax benefit

     on stock option exercises and stock bonus plan

     and from deferred compensation plan

 

173

 

 

 

 

1,824

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,824

 

Issuance of restricted stock and related income

     tax benefits

 

317

 

 

 

 

588

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

588

 

Cancellations of restricted stock

 

(91

)

 

 

 

(1,629

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,629

)

Balance at January 3, 2015

 

37,524

 

 

 

 

520,791

 

 

 

 

(11,655

)

 

 

 

238,117

 

 

 

 

747,253

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,710

 

 

 

 

62,710

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

208

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

208

 

Dividends - $0.54 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20,299

)

 

 

 

(20,299

)

Share repurchase

 

(282

)

 

 

 

(9,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,000

)

Stock-based employee compensation

 

 

 

 

 

7,240

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,240

 

Issuance of common stock and related tax benefit

     on stock option exercises and stock bonus plan

     and from deferred compensation plan

 

223

 

 

 

 

4,279

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,279

 

Issuance of restricted stock and related income

     tax benefits

 

315

 

 

 

 

1,114

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,114

 

Cancellations of restricted stock

 

(180

)

 

 

 

(2,726

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,726

)

Balance at January 2, 2016

 

37,600

 

 

$

 

521,698

 

 

$

 

(11,447

)

 

$

 

280,528

 

 

$

 

790,779

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Common

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Retained

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

Outstanding

 

 

Stock

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

Earnings

 

 

Total

 

Balance at January 2, 2016

 

37,600

 

 

$

 

521,698

 

 

$

 

(11,447

)

 

$

 

280,528

 

 

$

 

790,779

 

Net earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56,828

 

 

 

 

56,828

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

Dividends - $0.60 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(22,496

)

 

 

 

(22,496

)

Share repurchase

 

(396

)

 

 

 

(9,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,000

)

Stock-based employee compensation

 

 

 

 

 

7,936

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,936

 

Issuance of common stock and related tax benefit

     on stock option exercises, stock bonus plan

     and associate stock purchase plan

 

144

 

 

 

 

3,697

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,697

 

Issuance of restricted stock

 

315

 

 

 

 

(118

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(118

)

Cancellations of stock-based awards

 

(124

)

 

 

 

(2,229

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,229

)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

37,539

 

 

 

 

521,984

 

 

 

 

(11,437

)

 

 

 

314,860

 

 

 

 

825,407

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(52,845

)

 

 

 

(52,845

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,017

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,017

)

Reclassification of stranded tax effects in AOCI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,682

)

 

 

 

2,682

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends - $0.66 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(24,704

)

 

 

 

(24,704

)

Share repurchase

 

(1,367

)

 

 

 

(34,995

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(34,995

)

Stock-based employee compensation

 

 

 

 

 

9,611

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,611

 

Issuance of common stock on stock option

     exercises, stock bonus plan and associate stock

     purchase plan

 

172

 

 

 

 

3,697

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,697

 

Issuance of restricted stock

 

296

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancellations of stock-based awards

 

(174

)

 

 

 

(3,204

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,204

)

Balance at December 30, 2017

 

36,466

 

 

 

 

497,093

 

 

 

 

(15,136

)

 

 

 

239,993

 

 

 

 

721,950

 

Net earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,572

 

 

 

 

33,572

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(623

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(623

)

Dividends - $0.72 per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(25,923

)

 

 

 

(25,923

)

Share repurchase

 

(952

)

 

 

 

(20,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20,000

)

Stock-based employee compensation

 

 

 

 

 

7,646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,646

 

Issuance of common stock on stock option

     exercises, stock bonus plan and associate stock

     purchase plan

 

54

 

 

 

 

956

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

956

 

Issuance of restricted stock

 

483

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancellations of stock-based awards

 

(99

)

 

 

 

(1,631

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,631

)

Balance at December 29, 2018

 

35,952

 

 

$

 

484,064

 

 

$

 

(15,759

)

 

$

 

247,642

 

 

$

 

715,947

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

-47--43-


 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

SpartanNash Company and Subsidiaries

(In thousands)

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

Period Ended

 

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

(52 weeks)

 

 

(53 weeks)

 

 

(39 weeks)

 

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

$

 

62,710

 

 

$

 

58,596

 

 

$

 

741

 

Net earnings (loss)

$

 

33,572

 

 

$

 

(52,845

)

 

$

 

56,828

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

456

 

 

 

 

524

 

 

 

 

488

 

 

 

219

 

 

 

 

228

 

 

 

 

228

 

Earnings from continuing operations

 

 

63,166

 

 

 

 

59,120

 

 

 

 

1,229

 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash restructuring, asset impairment and other charges

 

 

9,755

 

 

 

 

6,166

 

 

 

 

15,644

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

33,791

 

 

 

 

(52,617

)

 

 

 

57,056

 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash goodwill/asset impairment, restructuring, and other charges

 

 

37,793

 

 

 

 

227,847

 

 

 

 

32,191

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

1,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,527

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

413

 

 

 

 

247

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

84,905

 

 

 

 

88,475

 

 

 

 

37,270

 

 

 

84,190

 

 

 

 

84,390

 

 

 

 

79,183

 

LIFO (income) expense

 

 

(1,201

)

 

 

 

5,603

 

 

 

 

928

 

Postretirement benefits (income) expense

 

 

(41

)

 

 

 

2,686

 

 

 

 

1,492

 

LIFO expense (income)

 

 

4,601

 

 

 

 

2,898

 

 

 

 

(1,919

)

Postretirement benefits expense

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

1,347

 

 

 

 

1,780

 

Deferred taxes on income

 

 

2,512

 

 

 

 

3,537

 

 

 

 

(3,566

)

 

 

7,407

 

 

 

 

(79,921

)

 

 

 

6,761

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

7,240

 

 

 

 

6,939

 

 

 

 

6,951

 

 

 

7,646

 

 

 

 

9,611

 

 

 

 

7,936

 

Excess tax benefit on stock compensation

 

 

(1,308

)

 

 

 

(699

)

 

 

 

(178

)

Postretirement benefit plan contributions

 

 

(1,889

)

 

 

 

(501

)

 

 

 

(413

)

Other, net

 

 

(22

)

 

 

 

(213

)

 

 

 

(870

)

 

 

(106

)

 

 

 

(160

)

 

 

 

(254

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(33,063

)

 

 

 

(517

)

 

 

 

40,292

 

 

 

(1,177

)

 

 

 

(25,276

)

 

 

 

30,537

 

Inventories

 

 

59,473

 

 

 

 

6,004

 

 

 

 

30,791

 

 

 

38,213

 

 

 

 

(48,478

)

 

 

 

(18,456

)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

(545

)

 

 

 

13,292

 

 

 

 

3,787

 

 

 

(6,467

)

 

 

 

(8,418

)

 

 

 

(45,506

)

Accounts payable

 

 

30,250

 

 

 

 

(29,231

)

 

 

 

(37,248

)

 

 

(18,358

)

 

 

 

(24,477

)

 

 

 

21,946

 

Accrued payroll and benefits

 

 

(1,903

)

 

 

 

(8,401

)

 

 

 

(23,822

)

 

 

(8,295

)

 

 

 

(17,253

)

 

 

 

1,193

 

Postretirement benefit payments

 

 

(1,013

)

 

 

 

(4,155

)

 

 

 

(2,964

)

Other accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

 

113

 

 

 

 

(9,533

)

 

 

 

(10,502

)

 

 

(5,754

)

 

 

 

(16,562

)

 

 

 

(15,091

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

219,489

 

 

 

 

139,073

 

 

 

 

64,761

 

 

 

171,658

 

 

 

 

52,843

 

 

 

 

157,191

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(79,394

)

 

 

 

(90,012

)

 

 

 

(37,200

)

 

 

(71,495

)

 

 

 

(70,906

)

 

 

 

(73,429

)

Net proceeds from the sale of assets

 

 

20,928

 

 

 

 

11,008

 

 

 

 

1,330

 

 

 

6,901

 

 

 

 

4,024

 

 

 

 

5,989

 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

(41,517

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20,647

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(226,939

)

 

 

 

 

Loans to customers

 

 

(1,450

)

 

 

 

(6,429

)

 

 

 

(58

)

 

 

(1,123

)

 

 

 

(10,328

)

 

 

 

(1,962

)

Payments from customers on loans

 

 

1,733

 

 

 

 

3,653

 

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

2,111

 

 

 

 

3,948

 

 

 

 

2,183

 

Proceeds from company owned life insurance

 

 

5,004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

(604

)

 

 

 

93

 

 

 

 

(819

)

 

 

(550

)

 

 

 

(15,192

)

 

 

 

(1,008

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(95,300

)

 

 

 

(81,687

)

 

 

 

(57,170

)

 

 

(64,156

)

 

 

 

(315,393

)

 

 

 

(68,227

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from revolving credit facility

 

 

1,089,979

 

 

 

 

1,062,173

 

 

 

 

877,033

 

Payments on revolving credit facility

 

 

(1,110,344

)

 

 

 

(1,079,654

)

 

 

 

(812,239

)

Share repurchase

 

 

(9,000

)

 

 

 

(4,987

)

 

 

 

 

Prepayment of senior notes

 

 

(50,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt extinguishment costs

 

 

(831

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from senior secured revolving credit facility

 

 

1,016,918

 

 

 

 

1,461,902

 

 

 

 

1,341,215

 

Payments on senior secured revolving credit facility

 

 

(1,123,557

)

 

 

 

(1,140,491

)

 

 

 

(1,384,958

)

Proceeds from other long-term debt

 

 

60,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of other long-term debt

 

 

(10,157

)

 

 

 

(20,353

)

 

 

 

(53,988

)

 

 

(8,175

)

 

 

 

(7,456

)

 

 

 

(9,146

)

Financing fees paid

 

 

(2,013

)

 

 

 

(870

)

 

 

 

(9,437

)

 

 

(2,217

)

 

 

 

(256

)

 

 

 

(2,498

)

Excess tax benefit on stock compensation

 

 

1,308

 

 

 

 

699

 

 

 

 

178

 

Share repurchase

 

 

(20,000

)

 

 

 

(34,995

)

 

 

 

(9,000

)

Net payments related to stock-based award activities

 

 

(1,630

)

 

 

 

(3,204

)

 

 

 

(2,229

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

3,661

 

 

 

 

1,120

 

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

284

 

 

 

 

3,207

 

 

 

 

2,518

 

Dividends paid

 

 

(20,299

)

 

 

 

(18,090

)

 

 

 

(5,908

)

 

 

(25,923

)

 

 

 

(24,704

)

 

 

 

(22,496

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(107,696

)

 

 

 

(59,962

)

 

 

 

(4,051

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(104,300

)

 

 

 

254,003

 

 

 

 

(86,594

)

Cash flows from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(740

)

 

 

 

(197

)

 

 

 

(421

)

 

 

(284

)

 

 

 

(137

)

 

 

 

(738

)

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

 

523

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in discontinued operations

 

 

(217

)

 

 

 

(197

)

 

 

 

(421

)

 

 

(284

)

 

 

 

(137

)

 

 

 

(738

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

16,276

 

 

 

 

(2,773

)

 

 

 

3,119

 

 

 

2,918

 

 

 

 

(8,684

)

 

 

 

1,632

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

6,443

 

 

 

 

9,216

 

 

 

 

6,097

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

 

22,719

 

 

$

 

6,443

 

 

$

 

9,216

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

15,667

 

 

 

 

24,351

 

 

 

 

22,719

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$

 

18,585

 

 

$

 

15,667

 

 

$

 

24,351

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

-48--44-


 

 

SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation

SpartanNash Company was formerly known as Spartan Stores, Inc. (“Spartan Stores”), which began doing business under the assumed name of “SpartanNash Company” upon completion of the merger with Nash-Finch Company (“Nash-Finch”) on November 19, 2013. The formal name change to SpartanNash Company was approved and became effective after the annual shareholders meeting on May 28, 2014. The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements (the “financial statements”) include the accounts of SpartanNash Company and its subsidiaries (“SpartanNash” or “the Company”).

Fiscal Year: The Company’s fiscal year end is the Saturday nearest to December 31. The fiscal year end was changed from the last Saturday in March in connection with the merger with Nash-Finch, effective beginning with the transition period ended December 28, 2013. As a result of this change, the transition period ended December 28, 2013 was a 39-week period beginning March 31, 2013. Fiscal years ended January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 consisted of 52 weeks and 53 weeks, respectively. Beginning with fiscal 2014, the Company’s interim quarters consist of 12 weeks except for the first quarter, which consists of 16 weeks. For fiscal 2014, the fourth quarter consisted of 13 weeks as a result of the 53 week fiscal year.

Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United StateStates of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of SpartanNash Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompanysubsidiaries (“SpartanNash” or “the Company”). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Fiscal Year: The Company’s fiscal year end is the Saturday nearest to December 31. The following discussion is as of and for the fiscal years ending or ended December 28, 2019 (“2019”), December 29, 2018 ("2018" or “current year”), December 30, 2017 (“2017” or “prior year”) and December 31, 2016 (“2016”), all of which include 52 weeks. All fiscal quarters are 12 weeks, except for the Company’s first quarter, which is 16 weeks.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported therein. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods might differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control of the promised goods and services to a customer, in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. This is achieved through applying the following five-step model:

Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer

Identification of the performance obligations in the contract

Determination of the transaction price

Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

Recognition of revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation

The Company generates substantially all of its revenue from contracts with customers, whether formal or implied. Sales taxes collected from customers are remitted to the appropriate taxing jurisdictions and are excluded from sales pricerevenue as the Company considers itself a pass-through conduit for collecting and remitting sales taxes, with the exception of taxes assessed during the procurement process of select inventories. Greater than 99% of the Company’s revenues are recognized at a point in time. Revenues from product sales are recognized when control of the goods is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured, andtransferred to the customer, takes possessionwhich occurs at a point in time, typically upon delivery or shipment to the customer, depending on shipping terms, or upon customer check-out in a corporate owned retail store. Freight revenues are also recognized upon delivery, at a point in time. Other revenues, including revenues from value-added services, are recognized as earned, over a period of time. All of the merchandise. The Military segment recognizesCompany’s revenues uponare domestic, as the Company has no performance obligations on international shipments subsequent to delivery of the product to the commissarydomestic port.

The Company evaluates whether it is the principal (i.e., report revenues on a gross basis) or commissaries designated by the Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA)agent (i.e., or in the case of overseas commissaries, when the product is delivered to the port designated by DeCA, which is when DeCA takes possession of the merchandise and bears the responsibility for shipping the product to the commissary or overseas warehouse. Revenues from consignment sales are included in the Company’s reported salesreport revenues on a net basis. The Food Distribution segment recognizes revenues when products are delivered or ancillary services are provided. Sales and excise taxes are excluded from revenue. The Retail segment recognizes revenues from the sale of products at the point of sale. basis) with respect to each contract with customers.

Based upon the nature of the products the Company sells, its customers have limited rights of return which are immaterial. Discounts provided by the Company to customers at the time of sale are recognized as a reduction in sales as the products are sold. The Company does not recognize a sale when it awards customer loyalty points or sells gift cardsCertain contracts include rebates and gift certificates; rather, a sale is recognized whenother forms of variable consideration, including up-front rebates, rebates in arrears, rebatable incentives, flex funds, and product incentives, which may have tiered structures based on purchase volumes and which are accounted for as variable consideration. To the customer loyalty points, gift card or gift certificate are redeemed to purchase product. Sales taxes collected from customers are remitted toextent the appropriate taxing jurisdictions and are excluded from sales revenue astransaction price includes variable consideration, the Company considers itselfestimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing either the expected value method or the most likely amount method depending on the nature of the variable consideration. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a pass-through conduit for collecting and remitting sales taxes.significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur.

-45-


Cost of Sales: Cost of sales isrepresents the cost of inventory sold during the period, includingwhich for all non-production operations includes purchase costs, in-bound freight, distribution costs, physical inventory adjustments, markdowns and promotional allowances.allowancesand excludes warehousing costs, depreciation and other administrative expenses. For the Company’s food processing operations, cost of sales includes direct product and production costs, inbound freight, purchasing and receiving costs, utilities, depreciation, and other indirect production costs and excludes out-bound freight and other administrative expenses. As a result, the Company’s cost of sales and gross profit may not be identical to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Vendor allowances and credits that relate to the Company’s buying and merchandising activities consist primarily of promotional allowances, which are generally allowances on purchased quantities and, to a lesser extent, slotting allowances, which are billed to vendors for the Company’s merchandising costs such as setting up warehouse infrastructure. Vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction in cost of sales when the related product is sold. Lump sum payments received for multi-year contracts are amortized over the life of the contracts based on contractual terms. The distribution segments include shipping and handling costs in the selling, general and administrative section of operating expenses on the consolidated statement of earnings.operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase.

-49-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Accounts and Notes Receivable: Accounts and notes receivable are shown net of allowances for credit losses of $6.8$4.3 million and $5.5$2.0 million as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively. The Company evaluates the adequacy of its allowances by analyzing the aging of receivables, customer financial condition, historical collection experience, the value of collateral and other economic and industry factors. Actual collections may differ from historical experience, and if economic, business or customer conditions deteriorate significantly, adjustments to these reserves may be required. When the Company becomes aware of factors that indicate a change in a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations, the Company records a specific reserve for credit losses. Operating results include bad debt expense of $2.1$3.4 million, $3.0$1.5 million and $1.3$1.4 million for fiscal years ended January 2,2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.

Inventory Valuation: Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Approximately 88.2%88.9% and 93.7%86.9% of the Company’s inventories were valued on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively. If replacement cost had been used, inventories would have been $49.5$55.1 million and $50.7$50.4 million higher at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively. The replacement cost method utilizes the most current unit purchase cost to calculate the value of inventories. During fiscal years ended January 2,2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, certain inventory quantities were reduced. The reductions resulted in liquidation of LIFO inventory carried at lower costs prevailing in prior years, the effect of which decreased the LIFO provision in fiscal years ended January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 and the 39-week period ended December 28, 20132018 by $0.6 million, $0.8$1.1 million, and $0.1 million, respectively. in 2017 and 2016 by $0.2 million.The Company accounts for its MilitaryFood Distribution and Food DistributionMilitary inventory using a perpetual system and utilizes the retail inventory method (“RIM”) to value inventory for center store products in the Retail segment. Under RIM, inventory is stated at cost with cost of sales and gross margin calculated by applying a cost ratio to the retail value of inventories. Fresh, pharmacy and fuel products are accounted for at cost in the Retail segment. The Company evaluates inventory shortages throughout the year based on actual physical counts in its facilities. The Company records allowances for inventory shortages based on the results of recent physical counts to provide for estimated shortages from the last physical count to the financial statement date.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets: Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of tangible net assets acquired in business combinations after amounts have been allocated to intangible assets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment during the last quarter of each year, or whenever events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, using a discounted cash flow model and comparable market values of each reporting segment. Measuring the fair value of reporting units is a Level 3 measurement under the fair value hierarchy. See Note 78, Fair Value Measurements, for a discussion of levels.

Intangible assets primarily consist of trade names, customer relationships, favorable lease agreements, pharmacy prescription lists, customer relationships, franchise agreements and fees, non-compete agreements, liquor licenses and liquor licenses.franchise fees. The following assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of time in which their expected benefits will be realized, which are as follows:realized: favorable leases (related lease terms), prescription lists and customer relationships (period of expected benefit)benefit reflecting the pattern in which the economic benefits are consumed), non-compete agreements and franchise fees (length of agreements), and trade names with definite lives (expected life of the assets). Indefinite-lived trade names are not amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment, and liquor licenses are also not amortized as they have indefinite lives. Intangible assets are included in “Other Assets, net” in the consolidated balance sheets.

-46-


Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures which improve or extend the life of the respective assets are capitalized, whereas expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation expense on land improvements, buildings and improvements, and equipment is computed using the straight-line method as follows:

Land improvements

15 years

Buildings and improvements

15 to 40 years

Equipment

3 to 15 years

 

Property under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the remaining terms of the leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets. Internal use software is included in property and equipment and amounted to $20.3$33.5 million and $17.7$30.7 million as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively.

-50-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: The Company reviews and evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When the undiscounted expected future cash flows are not sufficient to recover an asset’s carrying amount, the fair value is compared to the carrying value to determine the impairment loss to be recorded. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less the cost to sell. Fair values are determined by independent appraisals or expected sales prices based upon market participant data developed by third party professionals or by internal licensed real estate professionals. Estimates of future cash flows and expected sales prices are judgments based upon the Company’s experience and knowledge of operations. These estimates project cash flows several years into the future and are affected by changes in the economy, real estate market conditions and inflation.

Reserves for Closed Properties: The Company records reserves for closed properties that are subject to long-term lease commitments based upon the future minimum lease payments and related ancillary costs from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term, net of estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably expected to be obtained for the property. Future cash flows are based on contractual lease terms and knowledge of the geographic area in which the closed site is located. These estimates are subject to multiple factors, including inflation, ability to sublease the property and other economic conditions. Internally developed estimates of sublease rentals are based upon the geographic areas in which the properties are located, the results of previous efforts to sublease similar properties, and the current economic environment. The reserved expenses are paid over the remaining lease terms, which range from one to 1210 years. Adjustments to closed property reserves primarily relate to changes in subtenant income or actual exit costs differing from original estimates. Adjustments are made for changes in estimates in the period in which the changes become known. The current portion of the future lease obligations of stores is included in “Other accrued expenses,” and the long-term portion is included in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets.

Debt Issuance Costs: Debt issuance costs are amortized over the term of the related financing agreement and are included as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability in “Other assets, net”“Long-term debt and capital lease obligations” in the consolidated balance sheets.

Insurance Reserves: SpartanNash is primarily self-insured through self-insurance retentions or high deductible programs for workers’ compensation, general liability, and automobile liability, and is also self-insured for healthcare costs. Self-insurance liabilities are recorded based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Workers’ compensation, general liability and automobile liabilities are actuarially estimated based on available historical information on an undiscounted basis. The Company has purchased stop-loss coverage to limit its exposure to any significant exposure on a per claim basis.basis for its self-insurance retentions and high deductible programs. On a per claim basis, the Company’s exposure is up to $0.5 million for workers’ compensation and general liability, and$1.0 million for automobile liability and $0.5 million for healthcare per covered life per year. Any projection of losses concerning workers’ compensation, general liability, automobile liability and healthcare costs is subject to a considerable degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable external factors affecting future inflation rates, discount rates, litigation trends, changing regulations, legal interpretations, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns. Although the Company’s estimates of liabilities incurred do not anticipate significant changes in historical trends for these variables, such changes could have a material impact on future claim costs and currently recorded liabilities.

A summary of changes in the Company’s self-insurance liability is as follows:

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Balance at beginning of period

$

 

19,413

 

 

$

 

22,454

 

 

$

 

7,167

 

Balance assumed in merger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,248

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

 

15,155

 

 

$

 

14,730

 

 

$

 

14,466

 

Expenses

 

 

43,851

 

 

 

 

53,297

 

 

 

 

25,291

 

 

 

49,532

 

 

 

 

54,748

 

 

 

 

49,560

 

Claim payments, net of employee contributions

 

 

(48,798

)

 

 

 

(56,338

)

 

 

 

(23,252

)

 

 

(50,396

)

 

 

 

(54,323

)

 

 

 

(49,296

)

Balance at end of period

$

 

14,466

 

 

$

 

19,413

 

 

$

 

22,454

 

Balance at end of year

$

 

14,291

 

 

$

 

15,155

 

 

$

 

14,730

 

The current portion of the self-insurance liability was $8.2$8.6 million and $13.3$8.7 million as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively, and is included in “Other accrued expenses” in the consolidated balance sheets. The long-term portion was $6.2$5.7 million and $6.1$6.5 million as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively, and is included in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets.

-47-


Income Taxes: Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. Such deferred income tax asset and liability computations are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during the period in deferred and other tax assets and liabilities.

-51-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Earnings per share: Earnings per share (“EPS”) areis computed using the two-class method. The two-class method determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends and their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings. Participating securities include non-vested shares of restricted stock in which the participants have non-forfeitable rights to dividends during the performance period. Diluted EPS includes the effects of stock options.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted EPS for continuing operations:

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings from continuing operations

$

 

63,166

 

 

$

 

59,120

 

 

$

 

1,229

 

Adjustment for earnings attributable to participating securities

 

 

(1,098

)

 

 

 

(1,015

)

 

 

 

(26

)

Earnings from continuing operations used in calculating earnings

per share

$

 

62,068

 

 

$

 

58,105

 

 

$

 

1,203

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

$

 

33,791

 

 

$

 

(52,617

)

 

$

 

57,056

 

Adjustment for (earnings) loss attributable to participating securities

 

 

(746

)

 

 

 

908

 

 

 

 

(1,011

)

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations used in calculating earnings per share

$

 

33,045

 

 

$

 

(51,709

)

 

$

 

56,045

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding, including participating

securities

 

 

37,612

 

 

 

37,641

 

 

 

24,137

 

 

 

36,012

 

 

 

37,419

 

 

 

37,483

 

Adjustment for participating securities

 

 

(654

)

 

 

 

(646

)

 

 

 

(519

)

 

 

(795

)

 

 

 

(646

)

 

 

 

(664

)

Shares used in calculating basic earnings per share

 

 

36,958

 

 

 

 

36,995

 

 

 

 

23,618

 

 

 

35,217

 

 

 

 

36,773

 

 

 

 

36,819

 

Effect of dilutive stock options

 

 

106

 

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73

 

Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share

 

 

37,064

 

 

 

 

37,064

 

 

 

 

23,710

 

 

 

35,227

 

 

 

 

36,773

 

 

 

 

36,892

 

Basic earnings per share from continuing operations

$

 

1.68

 

 

$

 

1.57

 

 

$

 

0.05

 

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

$

 

1.67

 

 

$

 

1.57

 

 

$

 

0.05

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations

$

 

0.94

 

 

$

 

(1.41

)

 

$

 

1.52

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations

$

 

0.94

 

 

$

 

(1.41

)

 

$

 

1.52

 

 

Weighted average shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options that were not included in the EPS calculations because they were anti-dilutive were 322,914 and 334,17275,159 for fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 and the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.2017. There were no anti-dilutive stock options in fiscal year ended January 2,2018 or 2016.

Stock-Based Compensation: All share-based payments to associates are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as compensation cost based on the fair value on the date of grant. The grant date closing price per share of SpartanNash stock is used to estimate the fair value of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. The value of the portion of awards expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service period.

Shareholders’ Equity: The Company’s restated articles of incorporation provide that the Board of Directors may at any time, and from time to time, provide for the issuance of up to 10 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series, each with such designations as determined by the Board of Directors. At January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

Advertising Costs: The Company’s advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses. Advertising expenses were $47.7$40.9 million, $41.1$43.4 million and $15.3$46.6 million for fiscal years ended January 2,in 2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(“AOCI”): The Company reports comprehensive income (loss) that includes net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that are not included in net earnings, such as minimum pension and other postretirement liability adjustments, but rather are recorded directly in the consolidated statements ofto shareholders’ equity. These amounts are also presented in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. As of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015, the accumulated other comprehensive lossDecember 30, 2017, AOCI relates to the pension and postretirement liability.plans.

Discontinued operations: Certain of the Company’s RetailFood Distribution and Food DistributionRetail operations have been recorded as discontinued operations. Results of discontinued operations are excluded from the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented, unless otherwise noted. Results of discontinued operations reported on the consolidated statements of earningsoperations are reported net of tax.

-52--48-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2016,May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases,” which provides guidance for lease accounting. The new guidance contained in the ASU stipulates that lessees will need to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for substantially all leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments. Treatment in the consolidated statements of earnings will be similar to the current treatment of operating and capital leases. The new guidance is effective on a modified retrospective basis for the Company in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending December 28, 2019. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” ASU 2015-17 requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The Company adopted ASU 2015-17 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 on a retrospective basis for all periods presented. Adoption of this standard resulted in the reclassification of $22.5 million of “Deferred income taxes” from Current liabilities to Long-term liabilities as of January 3, 2015.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations: Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the same reporting period in which the adjustments are determined. The Company adopted ASU 2015-16 in the third quarter of fiscal 2015. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements as the Company has not recorded any significant measurement-period adjustments in fiscal 2015.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, "Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements." ASU 2015-15 supplements the requirements of ASU 2015-03 by allowing an entity to defer and present debt issuance costs related to a line of credit arrangement as an asset and subsequently amortize the deferred costs ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement. The new guidance is effective on a retrospective basis for the Company in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. Adoption of these standards in fiscal 2016 will retroactively decrease Other long-term assets and Long-term debt. As of January 2, 2016, such amount was approximately $8.2 million.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which provides guidance for revenue recognition. – Topic 606” (“ASC 606”). The new guidance contained in the ASU affects any reporting organization that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. As of the beginning of 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 and all subsequent ASUs that modified ASC 606. Refer to Note 3, Revenue Recognition, for additional information about adoption of this guidance and additional disclosures required under the standard.

From a principal versus agent perspective, the Company determined that certain contracts in the Food Distribution segment that were historically reported on a gross basis are now required to be reported on a net basis, resulting in a corresponding decrease to both net sales and cost of sales of $177.1 million in 2018 from what would have been recognized under previous guidance. The implementation of the guidance had no impact on gross profit, net earnings, the balance sheet, cash flows, equity, or the timing of revenue recognition in current or prior periods. The adoption of the guidance using the full retrospective method resulted in decreases to fiscal 2017 and 2016 net sales and cost of sales previously reported as shown in the following table:

 

Full Year

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

1st Quarter

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(16 Weeks)

 

2017

$

 

164,283

 

 

$

 

38,725

 

 

$

 

38,246

 

 

$

 

38,510

 

 

$

 

48,802

 

2016

$

 

173,516

 

 

$

 

43,168

 

 

$

 

42,382

 

 

$

 

38,594

 

 

$

 

49,372

 

In August 2015,March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Deferral2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits.” ASU 2017-07 requires that the service cost component of pension and postretirement benefit costs be presented in the same line item as other current employee compensation costs and other components of those benefit costs be presented separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if presented. The ASU also requires that only the service cost component of pension and postretirement benefit costs is eligible for capitalization. The Company adopted this guidance as of the Effective Date,” which resultsbeginning of 2018. Accordingly, benefit costs other than service cost, are reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings in Other, net, whereas they previously were recognized in Selling, general and administrative expenses. Retrospective application resulted in a decrease to Other, net and an increase in Selling, general and administrative expenses. The costs associated with the reclassifications were not material in any of the periods presented.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract” in order to provide additional guidance beingon the accounting for costs of implementation activities performed in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract. This is an amendment to ASU 2015-05, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software: Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.” ASU 2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company early adopted this guidance retrospectively as of the beginning of fiscal 2018, as permitted by the amendment. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General: Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans.” The amendments in this ASU remove disclosures that are no longer considered to be cost beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The amendments in ASU 2018-14 are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020 and will be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations – Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 narrows the definition of a business and provides a screen to determine when a set of the three elements of a business – inputs, processes, and outputs – are not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. If the screen is not met, the amendments (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The amendments provide a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. The guidance was effective for the Company as of the beginning of 2018. As no business combinations have occurred in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending December 29, 2018. Adoption is allowed by either the full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU 2014-08 changed the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and modified related disclosure requirements. The Company adopted ASU 2014-08 in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. Adoption of this standard did not have a material2018, there has been no impact on the consolidated financial statements for the current year. The adoption has no impact on the Company’s historical financial statements.

-49-


In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” The FASB subsequently issued ASU’s 2018-01, 2018-10, and 2018-11, which include clarifications and provide various practical expedients and transition options related to ASU 2016-02. ASU 2016-02 provides guidance for lease accounting and stipulates that lessees will need to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for substantially all leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The liability will be equal to the present value of lease rent payments. Treatment in the consolidated statements of operations will be similar to the current treatment of operating and capital leases.

The Company adopted the standard as of December 30, 2018, the beginning of fiscal 2019. The Company has elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which among other things, allows for the carryforward of the historical lease classification. In addition, the Company has elected the hindsight practical expedient to reassess the reasonably certain lease term for existing leases. The election of the hindsight practical expedient will result in the extension or reduction of lease terms for certain existing leases, and adjustments to the useful lives of corresponding leasehold improvements. The Company will make an accounting policy election not to record lease liabilities or right of use assets for short-term leases, those with an initial minimum term of less than one year.

The adoption of the standard will result in a recognition of additional lease assets and lease liabilities of approximately $240 million and $290 million, respectively, as of December 30, 2018, and a transition adjustment recorded to beginning of the year retained earnings of approximately $27 million (net of deferred tax impact of $9 million). The transition adjustment relates to impairment of right of use assets in transition and the impact of hindsight on the evaluation of lease term. Remaining differences between lease assets and liabilities relate to the derecognition of existing lease-related liabilities and assets recorded under ASC 840, which were included in beginning lease liabilities under ASC 842.

The Company does not believe the new standard will have an impact on liquidity or on debt-covenant compliance under the current agreements.

Note 2 – Merger and Acquisitions

On June 16, 2015, SpartanNashJanuary 6, 2017, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Dan’s Super Market, Inc. (Dan’s)Caito Foods Service (“Caito”) and Blue Ribbon Transport (“BRT”) for a total purchase price$214.6 million in cash, net of $32.6$2.5 million which included inventory of $3.7 million. The results of operations of the Dan’s acquisition are included in the accompanying financial statements from the date of acquisition. Dan’s is a six-store chain serving Bismarck and Mandan, North Dakota, and was not a customer of the SpartanNash Food Distribution segment prior to the acquisition. The Company acquired the Dan’s stores to strengthen its offering in this region from both a retail and distribution perspective. The purchasedcash acquired. Acquired assets include inventory, equipment, trade name, favorable lease, non-compete agreements, and goodwill. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and were based on preliminary estimates that may be subject to further adjustments within the measurement period. Goodwill of $24.6 million and $1.0 million was preliminarily assigned to the Retail and Food Distribution segments, respectively. The Company evaluated the acquired set of assets and activities, consistingconsist primarily of long-lived assets and operational processes, and determined they represent inputs and processes that constitute a business.

-53-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On November 19, 2013, Spartan Stores completed a merger with Nash-Finch, a food distribution company serving military commissaries and exchanges and independent grocery retailers, and an operator of retail grocery stores. The merger was pursued to create a larger, more balanced company with a broader customer base across multiple food retail and distribution businesses. Each outstanding share of the common stock of Nash-Finch converted into 1.20 shares of Spartan Stores common stock.

Consideration paid for all of the Nash-Finch outstanding shares consisted of the following:

(In thousands, except share price)

  

 

 

Spartan Stores common shares issued and deferred

  

 

16,119

  

Trading price

  

$

23.55

  

Fair value of shares issued

  

 

379,600

  

Cash paid for fractional shares

  

 

14

  

 

  

$

379,614

  

The following table summarizes the ending fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on November 19, 2013.

(In thousands)

  

Fair Value

 

Current assets

  

$

787,430

 

Property and equipment

  

346,500

 

Goodwill

  

36,622

 

Intangible assets

  

28,550

 

Other

  

38,160

 

Total assets acquired

  

1,237,262

 

Current liabilities

  

342,221

 

Other long-term liabilities

  

76,531

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

  

438,896

 

Total liabilities assumed

  

857,648

 

Net assets acquired

  

$

379,614

 

During the second quarter ended July 12, 2014, management of the Company made revisions to the cash flow projections to correct the allocation between certain reporting units related to the valuation analysis completed in 2013. Management concluded that the purchase accounting effect of the revisions was not material to the consolidated financial statements for any period presented. As a result of the revisions, property and equipment decreased by $23.0of $76.7 million, while intangible assets and goodwill increased by $19.3of $72.9 million, and $3.7working capital. Intangible assets are primarily composed of customer relationships, which are amortized over fifteen years, and indefinite lived trade names. In connection with the purchase, the Company provided certain earn-out opportunities that have the potential to pay the sellers an additional $27.4 million, respectively.

collectively, if the business achieves certain performance targets during the first three years after acquisition. As certain performance targets were not met in the first year after acquisition, the Company will be reimbursed a portion of the initial purchase price at an amount not to exceed the sum of: a) $15.0 million, representing the funds paid into escrow, and b) any earn-out opportunities earned by the sellers. The reduction in purchase price will first be applied to funds paid into escrow and then as an offset against and a reduction to any payments owed on the various earn-out opportunities, with reimbursement made once the parties agree on the measurement of performance against the targets. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired of $36.6$46.3 million was recorded as goodwill in the consolidated balance sheet and allocated to the Food Distribution segment. The goodwill recognizedsegment and is attributable primarily to expected synergies and the assembled workforce of Nash-Finch. No goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Intangible assetsCaito is a leading supplier of fresh fruits and vegetables as well as value-added meal solutions to grocery retailers and food service distributors across 21 states in the Southeast, Midwest and Eastern United States. BRT offers temperature-controlled distribution and logistics services throughout North America. The Company acquired were valuedCaito and assigned useful livesBRT to strengthen its fresh product offerings to its existing customer base and to expand into fast-growing, value-added services, such as follows:freshly-prepared centerplate and side dish categories.

Note 3 – Revenue

(In thousands)

  

Intangible
Assets

 

  

Useful Life

 

Trade names

  

$

6,700

  

  

 

Indefinite

  

Customer lists

  

 

5,100

  

  

 

7 years

  

Customer relationships

 

 

12,100

 

 

 

20 years

 

Favorable leases

  

 

4,650

  

  

 

7 to 22 years

  

 

  

$

28,550

  

  

 

 

 

-54-Sources of Revenue

The Company’s main sources of revenue include the following:

Customer Supply Agreements (CSAs) – The Company enters into CSAs (also known as Retail Sales and Service Agreements) with many of its retailer customers. These contracts obligate the Company to supply grocery and related products upon receipt of a purchase order from its customers. The contracts often specify minimum purchases a customer is required to make - in dollars or as a percentage of their total purchases - in order to earn certain rebates or incentives. In some cases, customers are required to repay certain advanced or loaned funds if they fail to meet purchase minimums or otherwise exit the supply agreement. Many of these contracts include various performance obligations other than providing grocery products, such as providing store resets, shelf tags, signage, or merchandising services. The Company has determined that these obligations are not material in the overall context of the contracts, and as such has not allocated transaction price to these obligations. Revenue is recognized under these contracts when control of the product passes to the customer, which may happen before or after delivery depending upon specified shipping terms.

-50-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Contracts with Manufacturers and Brokers to supply the Defense Commissary Agency (“DeCA”) and Other Government Agencies – DeCA operates a chain of 237 commissaries on U.S. military installations. DeCA contracts with manufacturers to obtain grocery products for the commissary system. Manufacturers either deliver the products to the commissaries themselves or, more commonly, contract with distributors such as SpartanNash to provide products to the commissaries. Manufacturers must authorize the distributors as their official representatives to DeCA, and the distributors must adhere to DeCA’s frequent delivery system (“FDS”) procedures governing matters such as product identification, ordering and processing, information exchange and resolution of discrepancies. The operating resultsCompany obtains distribution contracts with manufacturers through competitive bidding processes and direct negotiations. As commissaries need to be restocked, DeCA identifies the manufacturer with which an order is to be placed, determines which distributor is the manufacturer’s official representative for a particular commissary or exchange location, and then places a product order with that distributor under the auspices of Nash-Finch are includedDeCA’s master contract with the applicable manufacturer. The distributor selects that product from its existing inventory, delivers it to the commissary or port (in the case of overseas shipments) designated by DeCA, and bills the manufacturer for the product price plus a drayage fee that is typically based on a percentage of the purchase price, but may in some cases be based on a dollar amount per case or pound of product sold. The manufacturer then bills DeCA under the terms of its master contract. As control of the product passes to the customer upon delivery, revenue is recognized by SpartanNash at this point in time.

Revenue is recognized for the full amount paid by the vendor (for product and drayage) as the Company is a principal in the transaction and therefore should recognize revenue on a gross basis for these contracts. The FASB’s definition of a principal in the transaction is centered on controlling goods before they are transferred to the customer. Key considerations supporting that SpartanNash controls the goods for these contracts prior to transfer to the customer include the following: the Company has the ability to obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from the assets by selling the goods and/or by pledging the related assets as collateral for borrowings, the Company is required to bear the risk of inventory loss prior to transfer to the customer, has shared responsibilities in the fulfillment and acceptability of the goods, and to a lesser extent, has some discretion in establishing the price for the goods sold to DeCA. Based on a thorough evaluation of all of the facts and circumstances, including a detailed assessment and interpretation of the revenue standard, the Company concluded that it is a principal in the transaction and should recognize revenue on a gross basis for these contracts.

Retail Sales – The corporate owned retail stores recognize revenue at the time the customer takes possession of the goods. While there are no formal contracts related to these sales, they are within the scope of ASC 606. Customer returns are not material. The Company does not recognize a sale when it awards customer loyalty points or sells gift cards and gift certificates; rather, a sale is recognized when the customer loyalty points, gift card or gift certificate are redeemed to purchase product. There were no significant changes to revenue recognition in the Retail segment under ASC 606 related to the accounting for gift card breakage and loyalty rewards, which are immaterial to the consolidated resultsfinancial statements.

-51-


Disaggregation of operations beginning on November 19, 2013. Revenue

The following table provides net salesinformation about disaggregated revenue by type of products and resultscustomers for each of operationsthe Company’s reportable segments:

 

52 Weeks Ended December 29, 2018

 

(In thousands)

Food Distribution

 

 

Military

 

 

Retail

 

 

Total

 

Type of products:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Center store (a)

$

 

1,249,374

 

 

$

 

1,052,462

 

 

$

 

747,708

 

 

$

 

3,049,544

 

Fresh (b)

 

 

1,478,142

 

 

 

 

602,023

 

 

 

 

688,661

 

 

 

 

2,768,826

 

Non-food (c)

 

 

1,185,390

 

 

 

 

506,177

 

 

 

 

330,342

 

 

 

 

2,021,909

 

Fuel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

138,617

 

 

 

 

138,617

 

Other

 

 

78,544

 

 

 

 

6,181

 

 

 

 

931

 

 

 

 

85,656

 

Total

$

 

3,991,450

 

 

$

 

2,166,843

 

 

$

 

1,906,259

 

 

$

 

8,064,552

 

Type of customers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individuals

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

1,905,328

 

 

$

 

1,905,328

 

Manufacturers, brokers and distributors

 

 

197,128

 

 

 

 

2,089,765

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,286,893

 

Retailers

 

 

3,733,254

 

 

 

 

70,897

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,804,151

 

Other

 

 

61,068

 

 

 

 

6,181

 

 

 

 

931

 

 

 

 

68,180

 

Total

$

 

3,991,450

 

 

$

 

2,166,843

 

 

$

 

1,906,259

 

 

$

 

8,064,552

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52 Weeks Ended December 30, 2017

 

(In thousands)

Food Distribution

 

 

Military

 

 

Retail

 

 

Total

 

Type of products:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Center store (a)

$

 

1,206,832

 

 

$

 

1,054,590

 

 

$

 

792,925

 

 

$

 

3,054,347

 

Fresh (b)

 

 

1,456,632

 

 

 

 

577,084

 

 

 

 

734,564

 

 

 

 

2,768,280

 

Non-food (c)

 

 

1,085,282

 

 

 

 

507,394

 

 

 

 

336,630

 

 

 

 

1,929,306

 

Fuel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

126,673

 

 

 

 

126,673

 

Other

 

 

79,163

 

 

 

 

4,954

 

 

 

 

1,076

 

 

 

 

85,193

 

Total

$

 

3,827,909

 

 

$

 

2,144,022

 

 

$

 

1,991,868

 

 

$

 

7,963,799

 

Type of customers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individuals

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

1,990,792

 

 

$

 

1,990,792

 

Manufacturers, brokers and distributors

 

 

210,004

 

 

 

 

2,119,601

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,329,605

 

Retailers

 

 

3,556,591

 

 

 

 

19,467

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,576,058

 

Other

 

 

61,314

 

 

 

 

4,954

 

 

 

 

1,076

 

 

 

 

67,344

 

Total

$

 

3,827,909

 

 

$

 

2,144,022

 

 

$

 

1,991,868

 

 

$

 

7,963,799

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52 Weeks Ended December 31, 2016

 

(In thousands)

Food Distribution

 

 

Military

 

 

Retail

 

 

Total

 

Type of products:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Center store (a)

$

 

1,235,314

 

 

$

 

1,105,992

 

 

$

 

841,161

 

 

$

 

3,182,467

 

Fresh (b)

 

 

1,097,793

 

 

 

 

559,449

 

 

 

 

785,566

 

 

 

 

2,442,808

 

Non-food (c)

 

 

907,351

 

 

 

 

525,915

 

 

 

 

344,531

 

 

 

 

1,777,797

 

Fuel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

110,619

 

 

 

 

110,619

 

Other

 

 

40,567

 

 

 

 

5,658

 

 

��

 

1,168

 

 

 

 

47,393

 

Total

$

 

3,281,025

 

 

$

 

2,197,014

 

 

$

 

2,083,045

 

 

$

 

7,561,084

 

Type of customers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individuals

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

2,081,877

 

 

$

 

2,081,877

 

Manufacturers, brokers and distributors

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,191,356

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,191,356

 

Retailers

 

 

3,246,872

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,246,872

 

Other

 

 

34,153

 

 

 

 

5,658

 

 

 

 

1,168

 

 

 

 

40,979

 

Total

$

 

3,281,025

 

 

$

 

2,197,014

 

 

$

 

2,083,045

 

 

$

 

7,561,084

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  (a)   Center store includes dry grocery, frozen and beverages.

 

  (b)   Fresh includes produce, meat, dairy, deli, bakery, prepared proteins, seafood and floral.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  (c)   Non-food includes general merchandise, health and beauty care, tobacco products and pharmacy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

-52-


Contract Assets and Liabilities

Under its contracts with customers, the Company stands ready to deliver product upon receipt of a purchase order. Accordingly, the Company has no performance obligations under its contracts until its customers submit a purchase order. The Company does not receive pre-payment from its customers, or enter into commitments to provide goods or services that have terms greater than one year. As the acquired Nash-Finchperformance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of less than one year, the Company has applied the practical expedient under ASC 606 to omit disclosures regarding remaining performance obligations.

Revenue recognized from performance obligations related to prior periods (for example, due to changes in estimated rebates and incentives impacting the transaction price) was not material in any period presented.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may advance funds to certain independent retailers which are earned by the retailers primarily through achieving specified purchase volume requirements, as outlined in their supply agreements with the Company, or in limited instances, for remaining a SpartanNash customer for a specified time period. These advances must be repaid if the purchase volume requirements are not met or if the retailer no longer remains a customer for the specified time period. For volume-based arrangements, the Company estimates the amount of the advanced funds earned by the retailers based on the expected volume of purchases by the retailer, and amortizes the advances as a reduction of the transaction price and revenue earned. These advances are not considered contract assets under ASC 606 as they are not generated through the transfer of goods or services to the retailers. These advances are included in Other assets, net on the consolidated statementsCompany’s balance sheets.

When the Company transfers goods or services to a customer, payment is due - subject to normal terms - and is not conditional on anything other than the passage of earningstime. Typical payment terms range from due upon receipt to 30 days, depending on the type of customer and relationship. At contract inception, the Company expects that the period of time between the transfer of goods to the customer and when the customer pays for those goods will be less than one year, which is consistent with the Company’s standard payment terms. Accordingly, the Company has elected the practical expedient under ASC 606 to not adjust for the 39-weekeffects of a significant financing component. As such, these amounts are recorded as receivables and not contract assets. The Company had no contract assets for any period ended December 28, 2013 as well as unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information as if Nash-Finch was acquired on the first daypresented.

Accounts and notes receivable are comprised of the same 39-week period.following:

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

Customer notes receivable

$

 

3,130

 

 

$

 

2,555

 

Customer accounts receivable

 

 

314,791

 

 

 

 

312,214

 

Other receivables

 

 

32,516

 

 

 

 

31,169

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

(4,177

)

 

 

 

(1,881

)

Net current accounts and notes receivable

$

 

346,260

 

 

$

 

344,057

 

Long-term notes receivable

 

 

16,021

 

 

 

 

18,322

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

(120

)

 

 

 

(120

)

Net long-term notes receivable

$

 

15,901

 

 

$

 

18,202

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Period Ended
December 28, 2013

(Pro Forma)(A)

 

  

Period Ended
December 28, 2013

(Reported)(B)

 

Net sales

 

$

5,896,555

 

  

$

563,185

  

Net earnings

 

 

24,073

 

  

 

769

  

(A) Pro forma information isThe Company does not necessarily indicativetypically incur incremental costs of obtaining a contract that are contingent upon successful contract execution and would therefore be capitalized. The Company expenses incremental costs of obtaining a contract as and when incurred if the expected amortization period of the resultsasset that the Company would have been obtained if the acquisition had occurred at the beginningrecognized is one year or less.

Note 4 – Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the period presented or that may be obtained in the future.following:

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

Land and improvements

$

 

76,364

 

 

$

 

80,891

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

534,620

 

 

 

 

534,835

 

Equipment

 

 

605,515

 

 

 

 

567,123

 

Total property and equipment

 

 

1,216,499

 

 

 

 

1,182,849

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

637,439

 

 

 

 

582,609

 

Property and equipment, net

$

 

579,060

 

 

$

 

600,240

 

(B) Included in net earnings above are the following after-tax charges: merger and integration expenses of $2.0 million; asset impairment and restructuring charges of $0.4 million; and a loss on debt extinguishment of $2.6 million. Non-recurring merger transaction and integration costs of $26.5 million were incurred during the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, of which $21.0 million was included in selling, general and administrative expenses and $5.5 million was included in loss on debt extinguishment. Costs associated with the new revolving credit agreement of $9.4 million were capitalized and included in “Other assets, net” in the consolidated balance sheets.-53-


 

 

Note 35 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company has three reportable segments; however, no goodwill has existed within the Military segment. Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

Retail

 

 

Distribution

 

 

Total

 

Balance at December 28, 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

$

 

254,438

 

 

$

 

131,348

 

 

$

 

385,786

 

Accumulated impairment charges

 

 

(86,600

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(86,600

)

Goodwill, net

 

 

167,838

 

 

 

 

131,348

 

 

 

 

299,186

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

(1,906

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,906

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 3, 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

252,532

 

 

 

 

131,348

 

 

 

 

383,880

 

Accumulated impairment charges

 

 

(86,600

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(86,600

)

Goodwill, net

 

 

165,932

 

 

 

 

131,348

 

 

 

 

297,280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition (Dan's)

 

 

24,603

 

 

 

 

1,019

 

 

 

 

25,622

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 2, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

277,135

 

 

 

 

132,367

 

 

 

 

409,502

 

Accumulated impairment charges

 

 

(86,600

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(86,600

)

Goodwill, net

$

 

190,535

 

 

$

 

132,367

 

 

$

 

322,902

 

 

Food

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

Distribution

 

 

Retail

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016:

$

 

132,367

 

 

$

 

190,319

 

(a)

 

$

 

322,686

 

(a)

Acquisitions (Note 2)

 

 

46,281

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46,281

 

 

Disposals

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,292

)

 

 

 

 

(1,292

)

 

Impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

(189,027

)

 

 

 

 

(189,027

)

 

Balance at December 30, 2017 and December 29, 2018:

$

 

178,648

 

 

$

 

 

(b)

 

$

 

178,648

 

(b)

  (a)

Net of accumulated impairment charges of $86.6 million.

  (b)

Net of accumulated impairment charges of $275.6 million.

-55-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIESThe Company reviews goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment annually, during the fourth quarter of each year, and more frequently if circumstances indicate the possibility of impairment. Testing goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment requires management to make significant estimates about the Company’s future performance, cash flows, and other assumptions that can be affected by potential changes in economic, industry or market conditions, business operations, competition, or the Company’s stock price and market capitalization.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In 2017, the Company experienced significantly lower than expected Retail operating results and it was determined that the carrying value of the Retail segment exceeded its fair value. Consequently, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $189.0 million in the third quarter of 2017. The Company completed its current year impairment analysis in the fourth quarter, which did not result in the identification of any goodwill impairment.

The following table reflects the components of amortized intangible assets, included in “Other“Intangible assets, net” on the consolidated balance sheets:

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

 

December 29, 2018

 

 

December 30, 2017

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Accumulated

 

(In thousands)

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

 

Amount

 

 

Amortization

 

Non-compete agreements

$

 

1,306

 

 

$

 

725

 

 

$

 

2,528

 

 

$

 

1,836

 

 

 

 

$

 

3,358

 

 

$

 

886

 

 

$

 

3,408

 

 

$

 

397

 

Favorable leases

 

 

8,744

 

 

 

3,248

 

 

 

8,408

 

 

 

2,718

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,738

 

 

 

4,282

 

 

 

8,251

 

 

 

 

4,332

 

Pharmacy customer prescription lists

 

 

7,887

 

 

 

 

3,441

 

 

 

 

16,494

 

 

 

 

10,574

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,354

 

 

 

 

4,377

 

 

 

 

6,810

 

 

 

 

4,210

 

Customer relationships

 

 

17,542

 

 

 

1,308

 

 

 

12,100

 

 

 

684

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,937

 

 

 

7,835

 

 

 

57,937

 

 

 

 

4,173

 

Trade names

 

 

1,068

 

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

 

1,218

 

 

 

 

461

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,068

 

 

 

 

536

 

 

 

 

1,068

 

 

 

 

386

 

Franchise fees and other

 

 

559

 

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

 

514

 

 

 

 

184

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,064

 

 

 

 

422

 

 

 

 

1,047

 

 

 

 

381

 

Total

$

 

37,106

 

 

$

 

9,013

 

 

$

 

41,262

 

 

$

 

16,457

 

 

 

 

$

 

77,519

 

 

$

 

18,338

 

 

$

 

78,521

 

 

$

 

13,879

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The weighted average amortization periodperiods for amortizable intangible assets isas of December 29, 2018 are as follows:

Non-compete agreements

 

5.0

6.3 years

Favorable leases

 

15.7

15.2 years

Pharmacy customer prescription lists

 

7.4 years

8.1 year

Customer relationships

 

20.0

16.1 years

Trade names

 

7.0 years

Franchise fees and other

 

8.5

9.6 years

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $3.3$5.8 million, $3.7$5.5 million and $2.1$3.0 million for the fiscal years ended January 2,2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:

(In thousands)

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

Amortization expense

$

 

5,654

 

 

$

 

5,300

 

 

$

 

4,672

 

 

$

 

4,403

 

 

$

 

4,314

 

-54-


 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

2,921

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,813

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,585

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,466

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,069

 

Indefinite-lived intangible assets that are not amortized, consisting primarily of trade names and licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages, totaled $35.1$69.7 million and $33.0$69.8 million as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively.

Note 46 – Restructuring, ChargesAsset Impairment and Asset ImpairmentOther Charges

The following table provides the activity of reserves for closed properties for each of the fiscal years ended January 2, 20162018, 2017 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013.2016. Reserves for closed properties recorded in the consolidated balance sheets are included in “Other accrued expenses” in Current liabilities and “Other long-term liabilities” in Long-term liabilities based on when the obligations are expected to be paid.

 

 

 

 

Lease and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

Ancillary Costs

 

 

Severance

 

 

Total

 

Balance at January 2, 2016

 

 

 

$

 

14,448

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

14,448

 

Provision for closing charges

 

 

 

 

 

13,925

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,925

 

Provision for severance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

919

 

 

 

 

919

 

Changes in estimates

 

 

 

 

 

689

 

 

 

 

(40

)

 

 

 

649

 

Lease termination adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

(2,437

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,437

)

Accretion expense

 

 

 

 

 

675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

675

 

Payments

 

 

 

 

 

(5,368

)

 

 

 

(879

)

 

 

 

(6,247

)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

21,932

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,932

 

Provision for closing charges

 

 

 

 

 

3,852

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,852

 

Provision for severance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

624

 

 

 

 

624

 

Changes in estimates

 

 

 

 

 

1,191

 

 

 

 

(163

)

 

 

 

1,028

 

Lease termination adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

(2,600

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,600

)

Accretion expense

 

 

 

 

 

526

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

526

 

Payments

 

 

 

 

 

(7,012

)

 

 

 

(458

)

 

 

 

(7,470

)

Balance at December 30, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

17,889

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

17,892

 

Provision for closing charges

 

 

 

 

 

4,499

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,499

 

Provision for severance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

 

153

 

Changes in estimates

 

 

 

 

 

(1,181

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,181

)

Other

 

 

 

 

 

554

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

554

 

Accretion expense

 

 

 

 

 

579

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

579

 

Payments

 

 

 

 

 

(5,954

)

 

 

 

(156

)

 

 

 

(6,110

)

Balance at December 29, 2018

 

 

 

$

 

16,386

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

16,386

 

-56-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Lease and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

Ancillary Costs

 

 

Severance

 

 

Total

 

 

Balance at March 30, 2013

$

 

7,975

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

7,975

 

 

Assumed with merger

 

 

8,766

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,766

 

 

Provision for closing charges

 

 

4,923

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,923

 

(a)

Provision for severance

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,061

 

 

 

 

1,061

 

(b)

Changes in estimates

 

 

(1,333

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,333

)

(c)

Accretion expense

 

 

249

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

249

 

 

Reclassifications from deferred rent

 

 

1,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,104

 

 

Payments

 

 

(2,188

)

 

 

 

(26

)

 

 

 

(2,214

)

 

Balance at December 28, 2013

 

 

19,496

 

 

 

 

1,035

 

 

 

 

20,531

 

 

Provision for closing charges

 

 

543

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

543

 

(a)

Provision for severance

 

 

 

 

 

 

306

 

 

 

 

306

 

(b)

Changes in estimates

 

 

(563

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(563

)

(c)

Accretion expense

 

 

841

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

841

 

 

Payments

 

 

(6,329

)

 

 

 

(1,261

)

 

 

 

(7,590

)

 

Balance at January 3, 2015

 

 

13,988

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

14,068

 

 

Provision for closing charges

 

 

7,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,200

 

(a)

Provision for severance

 

 

 

 

 

 

395

 

 

 

 

395

 

(b)

Changes in estimates

 

 

(56

)

 

 

 

(80

)

 

 

 

(136

)

(c)

Lease termination adjustment

 

 

(1,745

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,745

)

(d)

Accretion expense

 

 

592

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

592

 

 

Payments

 

 

(5,531

)

 

 

 

(395

)

 

 

 

(5,926

)

 

Balance at January 2, 2016

$

 

14,448

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

14,448

 

 

(a)

The provision for closing charges represents initial costs estimated to be incurred for lease and related ancillary costs, net of sublease income, related to store closings in the Retail segment.

(b)

The provision for severance represents severance charges made in connection with property closures.

(c)

As a result of changes in estimates, goodwill was reduced by $1.3 million in both the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015 and in the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively, as the initial charges for certain stores were adjusted in the purchase price allocations for previous acquisitions.

(d)

The lease termination adjustment represents the benefit recognized in connection with lease buyouts on two previously closed stores. The lease liabilities were formerly included in the Company’s restructuring cost liability based on initial estimates.

Restructuring charges and asset impairment includedIncluded in the consolidated statements of earnings consisted of the following:

 

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

Asset impairment charges (a)

$

 

4,220

 

 

$

 

7,550

 

 

$

 

9,691

 

Provision for closing charges (b)

 

 

7,200

 

 

 

 

543

 

 

 

 

4,923

 

Gains on sales of assets related to closed facilities (c)

 

 

(2,997

)

 

 

 

(4,518

)

 

 

 

 

Provision for severance (d)

 

 

395

 

 

 

 

306

 

 

 

 

1,061

 

Other costs associated with distribution center and store closings

 

 

1,865

 

 

 

 

1,504

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in estimates (e)

 

 

(136

)

 

 

 

781

 

 

 

 

(31

)

Lease termination adjustment (f)

 

 

(1,745

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

8,802

 

 

$

 

6,166

 

 

$

 

15,644

 

(a)

An asset impairment charge of $880 was recorded in the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016 related to a closed distribution center in the Military segment. The remaining asset impairment charges in each of the periods presented were incurred in the Retail segment due to the economic and competitive environment of certain stores.

(b)

The provision for closing charges represents estimated costs to be incurred forliability are lease and related ancillary costs, net of sublease income, related to store closings in the Retail segment.

(c)

Gains on sales of assets resulted from the sale of a closed food distribution center and sales of closed stores in the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016. The remaining gains on sales in the other periods presented resulted from sales of closed stores in the Retail segment.

-57-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(d)

The provision for severance related to distribution center closings in the Food Distribution and Military segments and store closings in the Retail segment.

(e)

The majority of the changes in estimates relate to revised estimates of lease and ancillary costs associated with previously closed facilities in the Retail and Food Distribution segments. The Food Distribution segment realized $(0.3) million and $0.2 million in the fiscal years ended January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015, respectively, and the remaining charges were incurred in the Retail segment.

(f)

The lease termination adjustment represents the benefit recognized in connection with lease buyouts on two previously closed stores.

Lease obligations for closed facilities included in restructuring costs includerecorded at the present value of future minimum lease payments calculated using a risk-free interest rate, and related ancillary costs from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term, net of estimated sublease income.income, calculated using a risk-free interest rate.

Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges included in the consolidated statements of operations consisted of the following:

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Asset impairment charges

$

 

2,630

 

 

$

 

33,679

 

 

$

 

15,586

 

Charge on customer advance

 

 

32,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for closing charges

 

 

4,499

 

 

 

 

3,852

 

 

 

 

13,925

 

(Gain) loss on sales of assets related to closed facilities

 

 

(1,352

)

 

 

 

998

 

 

 

 

(134

)

Provision for severance

 

 

153

 

 

 

 

624

 

 

 

 

919

 

Other costs associated with distribution center and store closings

 

 

797

 

 

 

 

1,851

 

 

 

 

3,692

 

Changes in estimates

 

 

(1,181

)

 

 

 

1,028

 

 

 

 

865

 

Lease termination adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,600

)

 

 

 

(2,737

)

 

$

 

37,546

 

 

$

 

39,432

 

 

$

 

32,116

 

-55-


The charge on the customer advance relates to an independent retailer customer which is not expected to be fully recoverable and was therefore written down to its estimated realizable value, resulting in a charge of $32.0 million. See Note 15 – Concentration of Credit Risk for further information. Asset impairment charges in all years were incurred on long-lived assets primarily in the Retail segment due to the economic and competitive environment of certain stores and in conjunction with the Company’s retail store rationalization plan. The changes in estimates primarily relate to revised estimates performed in the current year related to lease turnover, ancillary costs and sublease income associated with previously closed locations, which were lower than the previous expectations at certain properties in the current year and reflected the deterioration of the condition of certain properties in 2017 and 2016. Lease termination adjustments represent the benefits recognized in connection with lease buyouts negotiated related to previously closed stores.

Long-lived assets are analyzed for impairment whenever circumstances arise that could indicate the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. If such circumstances exist, thenthe Company estimates are made of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and any proceeds from their eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings.operations. Measurement of the impairment loss to be recorded is equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the assets over the discounted future cash flows. When analyzing the assets for impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there areof identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets.

Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy, as further described in Note 8, Fair Value Measurements. Assets consisting of property and equipment with a book value of $3.7 million were measured at a fair value of $1.1 million, resulting in impairment charges of $2.6 million in 2018. Assets consisting primarily of property and equipment with a book value of $48.6 million were measured at a fair value of $14.9 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $33.7 million in 2017. Fair value of long-lived assets is determined by estimating the amount and timing of net future cash flows, discounted using a risk-adjusted rate of interest. The Company estimates future cash flows based on historical results of operations, external factors expected to impact future performance, experience and knowledge of the geographic area in which the assets are located, and when necessary, uses real estate brokers.

Note 5 – Accounts and Notes Receivable

Accounts and notes receivable at January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 are comprised of the following:

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

Customer notes receivable

$

 

2,385

 

 

$

 

1,944

 

Customer accounts receivable

 

 

282,153

 

 

 

 

265,976

 

Other receivables

 

 

37,817

 

 

 

 

19,554

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

(5,172

)

 

 

 

(4,777

)

Net current accounts and notes receivable

$

 

317,183

 

 

$

 

282,697

 

Long-term notes receivable

 

 

21,774

 

 

 

 

22,224

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

(1,597

)

 

 

 

(750

)

Net long-term notes receivable

$

 

20,177

 

 

$

 

21,474

 

Note 67 – Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

Senior secured revolving credit facility, due January 2020

$

 

394,982

 

 

$

 

403,201

 

6.625% Senior Notes due December 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,000

 

Senior secured term loan, due January 2020

 

 

34,842

 

 

 

 

46,989

 

Capital lease obligations (Note 9)

 

 

58,599

 

 

 

 

64,420

 

Other, 2.61% - 9.25%, due 2016 - 2020

 

 

6,558

 

 

 

 

5,658

 

 

 

 

494,981

 

 

 

 

570,268

 

Less current portion

 

 

19,003

 

 

 

 

19,758

 

Total long-term debt

$

 

475,978

 

 

$

 

550,510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Senior secured revolving credit facility, due December 2023

$

 

600,852

 

 

$

 

707,492

 

Senior secured term loan, due December 2023

 

 

60,000

 

 

 

 

 

Capital lease obligations (Note 10)

 

 

39,558

 

 

 

 

42,904

 

Other, 2.61% - 8.75%, due 2019 - 2024

 

 

4,447

 

 

 

 

5,972

 

Total debt – Principal

 

 

704,857

 

 

 

 

756,368

 

Unamortized debt issuance costs

 

 

(6,797

)

 

 

 

(6,417

)

Total debt

 

 

698,060

 

 

 

 

749,951

 

Less current portion

 

 

18,263

 

 

 

 

9,196

 

Total long-term debt

$

 

679,797

 

 

$

 

740,755

 

-58-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In January 2015,On December 18, 2018, SpartanNash Company and certain of its subsidiaries amended its secured revolving credit facility.entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”). The principal changes of the amendment were to reduce the Base and Eurodollar interest rates by 0.25% and to extendincluded an extension of the maturity date of the agreement, which was setloans from December 20, 2021 to expire on November 19, 2018,December 18, 2023, the ability to January 9, 2020. The amended credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”) provides for borrowingsincrease the size of $1.0 billion, consisting of three tranches: athe Tranche A revolving loan to $975 million from $900 million, securedan amendment to the interest rate grid such that rates for the Tranche A-1 revolving credit facility (Tranche A)loans ($40 million capacity) are now LIBOR plus 2.25% to LIBOR plus 2.50%, a $40reload of the Tranche A-2 term loan ($60 million secured revolving credit facility (Tranche A-1),capacity) and a $60 million term loan (Tranche A-2). Thereset of certain advance rates for the borrowing base. The Company has the ability to increase the size of the Credit Agreement by an additional $400$325 million, subject to certain conditions in the Credit Agreement. The Company’s obligations under the related Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the Company’s personal and real property. The Company may repay all loans in whole or in part at any time without penalty.

Availability under the Credit Agreement is based upon advance rates on certain asset categories owned by the Company, including, but not limited to the following: inventory, accounts receivable, real estate, prescription lists, cigarette tax stamps, and rolling stock.

The Credit Agreement imposes certain requirements, including: limitations on dividends and investments, (including distributions to subsidiaries designated as unrestricted subsidiaries), limitations on the Company’s ability to incur debt, make loans, acquire other companies, change the nature of the Company’s business, enter a merger or consolidation, or sell assets. These requirements can be more restrictive depending upon the Company’s Excess Availability, as defined under the Credit Agreement.

-56-


Borrowings under the three tranches of the credit facility bear interest at the Company’s option as either Eurodollar loans or Base Rate loans, subject to a grid based upon excess availability, as Excess Availabilitydefined in the Credit Agreement. As of January 2, 2016, the. The interest rate terms for each of the aforementioned tranches are as follows:

Credit

 

Outstanding as of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facility

 

as ofDecember 29, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tranche

 

January 2, 2016(In thousands)

 

 

Eurodollar Rate

 

Base Rate

Tranche A

 

$

 

360,973569,601

 

 

LIBOR plus 1.50%1.25% to 2.00%1.50%

 

Greater of:

(i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.00%0.75% to 1.50%1.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.50%2.25% to 2.00%2.50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii) the prime rate plus 0.50%0.25% to 1.00%0.50%

Tranche A-1

 

$

 

34,00831,251

 

 

LIBOR plus 2.75%2.25% to 3.25%2.50%

 

Greater of:

(i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 2.25%1.75% to 2.75%2.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii) the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.75%2.25% to 3.25%2.50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii) the prime rate plus 1.75%1.25% to 2.25%1.50%

Tranche A-2

 

$

 

34,84360,000

 

 

LIBOR plus 5.50%5.25%

 

Greater of:

(i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 5.00%4.75%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii) the Eurodollar Rate plus 5.50%5.25%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii) the prime rate plus 4.50%4.25%

The Company also incurs an unused line of credit fee on the unused portion of the loan commitments at a rate ranging fromof 0.25% to 0.375%.

As of January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015, the secured revolving credit facilities and senior secured term loan had total outstanding borrowings of $429.8 million and $450.2 million, respectively. The Credit Agreement requires that the Company maintain excess availabilityExcess Availability of 10% of the borrowing base, as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Company is in compliance with all financial covenants as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and had excess availabilityExcess Availability after the 10% requirement of $334.3$262.0 million and $406.8$132.7 million at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively. The credit facilityCredit Agreement provides for the issuance of letters of credit, of which $11.1$11.7 million and $11.5$9.2 million were outstanding as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively.

In November 2015, the Company called for redemption all of the outstanding $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 6.625% Senior Notes due December 2016 (the “Notes”). The Company redeemed the Notes for cash, using borrowings under its revolving credit facility, on December 15, 2015. Notes called for redemption became due and payable on the redemption date at a cash redemption price of 101.65625% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. A loss on debt extinguishment of $1.2 million was incurred consisting of the redemption premium and the write-off of unamortized issuance costs. As a result of the redemption, the Company expects to reduce annual interest expense by approximately $2.0 million, assuming no future interest rate increases.

The weighted average interest rate for all borrowings, including loan fee amortization, was 3.90%4.08% for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016.2018.

-59-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, aggregate annual maturities and scheduled payments of long-term debt are as follows:

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

$

 

19,003

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

18,906

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

20,231

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

12,379

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

399,778

 

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

24,684

 

Total

 

 

 

$

 

494,981

 

(In thousands)

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

Total borrowings

$

 

18,263

 

 

$

 

16,569

 

 

$

 

13,911

 

 

$

 

13,341

 

 

$

 

623,559

 

 

$

 

19,214

 

 

$

 

704,857

 

 

Note 78 – Fair Value Measurements

Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. At January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015, the book value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt instruments were as follows:

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

Book value of debt instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations

$

 

19,003

 

 

$

 

19,758

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

475,978

 

 

 

 

550,510

 

Total book value of debt instruments

 

 

494,981

 

 

 

 

570,268

 

Fair value of debt instruments

 

 

497,116

 

 

 

 

574,008

 

Excess of fair value over book value

$

 

2,135

 

 

$

 

3,740

 

The estimated fair value of debt is based on market quotes for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities (Level 2 inputs and valuation techniques).

ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

Long-lived assets are measured atFinancial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. For discussion of the fair value measurements related to goodwill and long-lived asset impairment charges, refer to Note 5, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and Note 6, Restructuring, Asset Impairment and Other Charges. At December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, the book value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs, were as follows:

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

Book value of debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations

$

 

18,263

 

 

$

 

9,196

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

686,594

 

 

 

 

747,172

 

Total book value of debt instruments

 

 

704,857

 

 

 

 

756,368

 

Fair value of debt instruments, excluding debt financing costs

 

 

705,875

 

 

 

 

757,966

 

Excess of fair value over book value

$

 

1,018

 

 

$

 

1,598

 

-57-


The estimated fair value of debt is based on market quotes for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities (Level 2 inputs and valuation techniques).

Certain of the Company’s business combinations involve the potential for the receipt or payment of future contingent consideration upon the shortfall or achievement of various operating thresholds, respectively. The additional consideration is generally contingent on the acquired company reaching certain performance milestones, including attaining specified EBITDA levels. An asset or liability is recorded for the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date and is re-measured each reporting period, with changes in fair value recognized as income or expense within operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company measures the asset and liability on a nonrecurringrecurring basis using Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. As of the fiscal years ended January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015, assets with a book value of $11.9 million and $17.9 were measured at ainputs.

The fair value of $7.7 millioncontingent consideration is measured using a discounted cash flow model incorporating projected payment dates, discount rates, probabilities of payment, and $10.3 million, respectively. The Company’s accounting and finance team management, who report toprojected EBITDA. Projected EBITDA amounts are based on initial deal model forecasts at the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), determinestime of acquisition as well as the Company’s valuation policiesmost recent internal operational budget and procedures.include a probability weighted range of outcomes. Changes in projected EBITDA, probabilities of payment, discount rates, or projected payment dates may result in higher or lower fair value measurements. The development and determination of the unobservable inputs forrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements andof contingent consideration include the following significant unobservable inputs as of December 29, 2018:

Unobservable Input

Range

Discount rate

11.80%

Probability of payments

0% - 100%

Projected year(s) of payments

2019

As of December 29, 2018, the fair value calculations areof contingent consideration receivable and payable associated with the responsibilityCaito and BRT acquisition was $18.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The net receivable of $15 million is recorded in other current assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets as there is a right of offset for the payable and receivable. Upon payment, the portion of the Company’s accounting and finance team management and are approved bycontingent consideration related to the CFO. Fairacquisition date fair value is reported as a financing activity in the consolidated statements of long-lived assets is determined by estimating the amount and timing of net future cash flows, discounted using a risk-adjusted rate of interest. The Company estimates future cash flows based on experience and knowledgeflows. Amounts received or paid in excess of the geographic areaacquisition date fair value are reported as an operating activity in which the assets are located, and when necessary, uses real estate brokers. See Note 4 for discussionconsolidated statements of long-lived asset impairment charges.cash flows.

Note 89 – Commitments and Contingencies

The Company subleases property at certain locations and for the fiscal years ended January 2,2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, the Company received rental income of $5.3$3.6 million, $5.0$3.4 million and $2.2$4.8 million, respectively. In the event of the customer’scustomer default, the Company would be responsible for fulfilling these lease obligations. The futureFuture payment obligations under these leases are disclosed in Note 9.10, Leases. Contingencies related to credit risk and collectability are disclosed in Note 15, Concentration of Credit Risk.

-60-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Unions represent approximately 9% of SpartanNash’s associates. These associates are covered by collective bargaining agreements.agreements (“CBAs”). The facilities covered by collective bargaining agreements,CBAs, the unions representing the covered associates and the expiration dates for each existing collective bargaining agreementCBA are provided in the following table:

 

Distribution Center Locations

 

Union Locals

 

Expiration Dates

Norfolk, Virginia

 

IBT822IBT 822

 

April 2016

Westville, Indiana

IBT 135

May, 20162019

Columbus, OhioGeorgia

 

IBT 528

 

September 20162019

Grand Rapids, Michigan

IBT 406

October 2019

Landover, Maryland

IBT 639

February 2021

Lima, Ohio

 

IBT 908

 

January 20172022

Bellefontaine, Ohio GTL Truck Lines, Inc. (a)

 

IBT 908

 

February 20172022

Bellefontaine, Ohio General Merchandise Service Division (a)

 

IBT 908

 

March, 2017February 2022

Grand Rapids, Michigan  (a)

IBT406

October, 2017The Company is in the process of negotiating contract extensions at these locations, which have been updated with the contemplated expiration dates.

The Company is engaged from time-to-time in routine legal proceedings incidental to its business. The Company does not believe that these routine legal proceedings, taken as a whole, will have a material impact on its business or financial condition. While the ultimate effect of such actions cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that their outcome will not result in an adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operating results or liquidity.

-58-


The Company contributes to the Central States Southeast and Southwest Pension Fund (“Central States Plan” or “the Plan”), a multi-employer pension plan, based on obligations arising from itsin accordance with provisions in place in collective bargaining agreements covering its supply chain operations in Bellefontaine, Ohio, Lima, Ohio, and Grand Rapids, Michigan covering its distribution center union associates at those locations.Rapids. This Plan provides retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers. The benefits are paid from assets held in trust for that purpose. Trustees are appointed by contributing employers and unions; however, SpartanNash is not a trustee.trustee of the Plan. The trustees typically are responsible for determining the level of benefits to be provided to participants, as well as for such matters as the investment of the assets held in trust and the overall administration of the plan. The Company currently contributes to the Central States Plan under the terms outlined in the “Primary Schedule” of Central States’ Rehabilitation Plan. This schedule requiresPlan or those outlined in the “Default Schedule.” Both the Primary and Default schedules require varying increases in employer contributions over the previous year’s contribution. Increases are setnegotiated within theeach collective bargaining agreement and vary by location. On December 13, 2014, Congress passed the Multi-employer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (“MPRA”). The MPRA is intendedPlan continues to address funding shortfallsbe in both multi-employer pension plansred zone status, and according to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. Because the MPRAProtection Act (“PPA”), is a complex piece of legislation, its effects on the Plan and potential implications for the Company are not known at this time. Any adjustment for withdrawal liability willconsidered to be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably determined.

On September 25, 2015, Central States submitted a Rescue Plan to the United States Department of Treasury (“Department of Treasury”) as permitted under the provisions of the MPRA relating to plans in “critical and decliningdeclining” zone status.” Under Among other factors, plans in the Rescue Plan, Trustees seek“critical and declining” zone are generally less than 65% funded and are projected to suspendbecome insolvent within the pension benefits of retirees and actives in order to save the pension plan from future financial failure. The proposed Rescue Plan is tiered and intended to equitably distribute benefit suspensions across three participant classes: orphans, participants and UPS transfer group. Under the MPRA, the Department of Treasury has 225 days in which to consider and actnext 15 years (or 20 years depending on the proposed Plan. Following the Departmentratio of Treasury’s review, Plan participants will be afforded the opportunity to consider and vote on the proposed benefit suspensions. Given the Department of Treasury’s review period and the amount of time necessary for a participant vote, Central States estimates that the proposed benefit suspensions, if approved, would not take effect until July 1, 2016. The Company is currently unable to reasonably estimate the potential impact of this Rescue Plan on its withdrawal liability.active-to-inactive participants).

Based on the most recent information available to the Company, management believes that the present value of actuarial accrued liabilities in this multi-employer plan significantly exceeds the value of the assets held in trust to pay benefits. Because SpartanNash is one of a number of employers contributing to this plan, it is difficult to ascertain what the exact amount of the underfunding would be, although management anticipates that the Company’s contributions to this plan will increase each year.be. Management is not aware of any significant change in funding levels since January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018. To reduce this underfunding, management expects meaningful increases in expense as a result of required incremental multi-employer pension plan contributions in future years. Any adjustment for withdrawal liability will be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably determined.

-61-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 910 – Leases

A substantial portion of the Company’s retail stores and warehouse propertieswarehouses are operated in leased facilities. The Company also leases small ancillary warehouse facilities, the tractormajority of the tractors and trailertrailers within its fleet, and certain other equipment. Most of the property leases contain renewal options of varying terms. Terms of certain leases contain provisions requiring payment of percentage rent based on sales and payment of executory costs such as property taxes, utilities, insurance, maintenance and other occupancy costs applicable to the leased premises. Terms of certain leases of transportation equipment contain provisions requiring payment of percentage rent based upon miles driven. Portions of certain propertyCertain properties or portions thereof are subleased to others. Operating leases often contain renewal options. In those locations in which it makes economic sense to continue to operate, management expects that, in the normal course of business, leases that expire will be renewed or replaced by other leases.

Rental expense, net of sublease income, under operating leases consisted of the following:

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Minimum rentals

$

 

57,625

 

 

$

 

56,848

 

 

$

 

28,978

 

Minimum rentals

$

 

61,774

 

 

$

 

55,159

 

 

$

 

57,478

 

Contingent rental payments

 

 

267

 

 

 

563

 

 

 

541

 

Contingent rent (reductions) increases

Contingent rent (reductions) increases

 

 

(219

)

 

 

(237

)

 

 

314

 

Sublease rental income

 

 

(5,311

)

 

 

 

(5,027

)

 

 

 

(2,157

)

Sublease rental income

 

 

(3,554

)

 

 

 

(3,407

)

 

 

 

(4,830

)

$

 

52,581

 

 

$

 

52,384

 

 

$

 

27,362

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

58,001

 

 

$

 

51,515

 

 

$

 

52,962

 

The Company’s total future lease commitments under operating and capital leases in effect at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Leases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Used in

 

 

Subleased

 

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operations

 

 

to Others

 

 

Total

 

 

Leases

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

54,098

 

 

$

 

1,039

 

 

$

 

55,137

 

 

$

 

9,091

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,212

 

 

 

 

817

 

 

 

 

48,029

 

 

 

 

7,049

 

2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,887

 

 

 

 

694

 

 

 

 

40,581

 

 

 

 

5,377

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,299

 

 

 

 

468

 

 

 

 

32,767

 

 

 

 

4,685

 

2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,419

 

 

 

 

357

 

 

 

 

25,776

 

 

 

 

3,912

 

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,626

 

 

 

 

147

 

 

 

 

75,773

 

 

 

 

25,152

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

274,541

 

 

$

 

3,522

 

 

$

 

278,063

 

 

 

 

55,266

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

 

 

(15,708

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Present value of minimum lease obligations

 

 

 

 

39,558

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities

 

 

 

 

6,840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term capital lease obligations

 

 

$

 

32,718

 

-59-


 

 

Operating Leases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Used in

 

 

Subleased

 

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

(In thousands)

Operations

 

 

to Others

 

 

Total

 

 

Leases

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

$

 

48,496

 

 

$

 

3,756

 

 

$

 

52,252

 

 

$

 

11,764

 

2017

 

 

41,761

 

 

 

 

3,205

 

 

 

 

44,966

 

 

 

 

11,110

 

2018

 

 

36,459

 

 

 

 

2,753

 

 

 

 

39,212

 

 

 

 

10,799

 

2019

 

 

26,562

 

 

 

 

2,258

 

 

 

 

28,820

 

 

 

 

9,780

 

2020

 

 

20,721

 

 

 

 

1,792

 

 

 

 

22,513

 

 

 

 

6,591

 

Thereafter

 

 

66,291

 

 

 

 

8,282

 

 

 

 

74,573

 

 

 

 

35,551

 

Total

$

 

240,290

 

 

$

 

22,046

 

 

$

 

262,336

 

 

 

 

85,595

 

 

Interest

 

 

 

 

(26,996

)

 

Present value of minimum lease obligations

 

 

 

 

58,599

 

 

Current maturities

 

 

 

 

7,471

 

 

Long-term capitalized lease obligations

 

 

$

 

51,128

 

Assets held under capital leases consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Building and improvements

$

 

72,297

 

 

$

 

72,747

 

Building and improvements

 

$

 

57,326

 

 

$

 

60,398

 

Equipment

 

 

5,281

 

 

 

 

5,695

 

Equipment

 

 

 

6,889

 

 

 

 

3,727

 

 

 

77,578

 

 

 

 

78,442

 

Assets under capital leases

Assets under capital leases

 

 

 

64,215

 

 

 

 

64,125

 

Less accumulated amortization and depreciation

 

 

31,372

 

 

 

 

29,842

 

Less accumulated amortization and depreciation

 

 

 

30,774

 

 

 

 

29,518

 

Net assets under capitalized leases

$

 

46,206

 

 

$

 

48,600

 

Net assets under capital leases

Net assets under capital leases

 

$

 

33,441

 

 

$

 

34,607

 

Amortization expense for property under capital leases was $3.6$4.3 million, $4.4 million and $2.8$5.2 million in fiscal years ended January 2,2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.

Certain retail store facilities, either owned or obtained through leasing arrangements, are leased to others. A majority of the leases provide for minimum and contingent rentals based upon stipulated sales volumes and contain renewal options. Certain of the leases contain escalation clauses.

-62-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Owned assets, included in property and equipment, which are leased to others are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Land and improvements

$

 

3,508

 

 

$

 

3,327

 

Land and improvements

$

 

7,389

 

 

$

 

6,515

 

Buildings

 

 

10,640

 

 

 

 

10,786

 

Buildings

 

 

28,932

 

 

 

 

24,236

 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

14,148

 

 

 

 

14,113

 

Owned assets leased to others

Owned assets leased to others

 

 

36,321

 

 

 

 

30,751

 

Less accumulated amortization and depreciation

 

 

5,890

 

 

 

 

5,187

 

Less accumulated amortization and depreciation

 

 

10,044

 

 

 

 

8,123

 

Net property

$

 

8,258

 

 

$

 

8,926

 

Net owned assets leased to others

Net owned assets leased to others

$

 

26,277

 

 

$

 

22,628

 

Future minimum rentals to be received under lease obligations in effect at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 are as follows:

 

Owned

 

 

Leased

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

Property

 

 

Property

 

 

Total

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

$

 

3,535

 

 

$

 

4,535

 

 

$

 

8,070

 

2017

 

 

2,535

 

 

 

 

3,976

 

 

 

 

6,511

 

2018

 

 

1,421

 

 

 

 

3,347

 

 

 

 

4,768

 

2019

 

 

1,175

 

 

 

 

2,723

 

 

 

 

3,898

 

2020

 

 

824

 

 

 

 

2,131

 

 

 

 

2,955

 

Thereafter

 

 

1,513

 

 

 

 

9,093

 

 

 

 

10,606

 

Total

$

 

11,003

 

 

$

 

25,805

 

 

$

 

36,808

 

(In thousands)

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

Owned property

$

 

4,876

 

 

$

 

4,540

 

 

$

 

4,243

 

 

$

 

3,773

 

 

$

 

2,754

 

 

$

 

20,002

 

 

$

 

40,188

 

Leased property

 

 

2,993

 

 

 

 

2,594

 

 

 

 

1,888

 

 

 

 

1,597

 

 

 

 

1,274

 

 

 

 

3,316

 

 

 

 

13,662

 

Total

$

 

7,869

 

 

$

 

7,134

 

 

$

 

6,131

 

 

$

 

5,370

 

 

$

 

4,028

 

 

$

 

23,318

 

 

$

 

53,850

 

 

Note 1011 – Associate Retirement Plans

The Company’s retirement programs include pension plans providing non-contributory benefits and salary reductiondeferral defined contribution plans providing contributory benefits.plans. Substantially all of the Company’s associates not covered by collective bargaining agreementsCBAs are covered by a frozen non-contributory pension plan, a defined contribution plan, or both. Associates covered by collective bargaining agreements are includedCBAs at the Company’s Columbus, Georgia; Norfolk, Virginia; and Landover, Maryland facilities all participate in the Company’s defined contribution plan; the remaining associates covered under CBAs participate in a multi-employer pension plans.plan.

Defined Contribution Plans

Expense for employer matching and profit sharingprofit-sharing contributions made to defined contribution plans totaled $21.1$7.0 million, $13.6$7.9 million and $4.8$11.9 million in fiscal years ended January 2,2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.

Executive Compensation Plans

The Company has a deferred compensation plan for a select group of management personnel or highly compensated associates. The plan is unfunded and permits participants to defer receipt of a portion of their base salary, annual bonus, or long-term incentive compensation which would otherwise be paid to them. The deferred amounts, plus earnings, are distributed following the associate’s termination of employment. Earnings are based on the performance of phantomhypothetical investments elected by the participant from a portfolio of investment options.

The Company had two separate trusts established for the protection of cash balances owed to participants in its deferred compensation plans. The Company was required, as specified by the plan documents, to fund these trusts with 125% of its pre-merger liability to plan participants. These trusts were terminated in 2015 and the Company received cash proceeds from the liquidation of corporate owned life insurance policies of $5.0 million.

The Company also holds additional variable universal life insurance policies on certain key associates intended to fund distributions under the deferred compensation plan referenced above. The net cash surrender value of approximately $4.2$4.3 million at both January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, respectively, is recorded in “Other assets, net” in the consolidated balance sheets. These policies have an aggregate amount of life insurance coverage of approximately $15.0 million.

-60-


Defined Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”), a frozen defined benefit pension plans for certain associates. plan. On February 28, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors granted approval to proceed with terminating the frozen Pension Plan and the Plan was terminated on July 31, 2018. The Company will offer participants the option to receive an annuity or lump sum distribution which may be rolled over into another qualified plan. The distribution of assets to plan participants is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2019. The Company will incur a one-time, pre-tax settlement charge estimated to be approximately $20 million to $21 million to recognize the deferred losses in AOCI upon distribution of the Plan assets and related recognition of the settlement as well as other termination expenses. The Company expects the Plan termination will reduce administrative fees and premium funding costs in future periods.

The pension benefits are primarily based on years of service and compensation, with some differences resulting from the nature of how benefits were calculated under the Company’s legacy defined benefit plans, as described below.

-63-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The On December 31, 2014, the Retirement Plan for Employees of Super Food Services, Inc. (“Super Foods Plan”) was merged into the Spartan Stores, Inc. Cash Balance Pension Plan (“Cash Balance Pension Plan”), and renamed the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan. The merging of the plans resulted in lower administrative fees and reduced cash funding. Annual payments to the pension trust fund are determined in compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1976 (“ERISA”). As of December 29, 2018, plan assets consist principally of U.S. government and corporate obligations.

The Cash Balance Pension Plan, a non-contributory cash balance pension plan, was frozen effective January 1, 2011. As a result of the freeze, no additional associates were eligible to participate in the plan after January 1, 2011, and additional service credits were no longer added to each participant’s account; however, interest credits continue to accrue. Prior to the plan freeze, the plan benefit formula utilized a cash balance approach whereby credits were added annually to a participant’s account based on compensation and years of vested service, with interest credits also added to the participant’s account at the Company’s discretion.

The Retirement Plan for Employees of Super Food Services, Inc. (“Super Foods Plan”),Plan, a qualified non-contributory pension plan offered by one of the Company’s subsidiaries, provides retirement income for certain eligible full-time associates who are not covered by a union retirement plan. Pension benefits under the plan are based on length of service and compensation, and contributions meet the minimum funding requirements. This plan has been curtailed and no new associates can enter the plan. This planwas frozen effective January 1, 1998.

If lump sum distributions are made in an amount exceeding annual interest cost, settlement accounting is also frozen for additional service credits.

On December 31, 2014, the Super Foods Plan was merged into the Cash Balance Pension Plan and renamed the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan. The merging of the plans resulted in lower administrative fees and reduced cash funding. Annual payments to the pension trust fund are determined in compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1976 (“ERISA”). Plan assets consist principally of U.S. government and corporate obligations and common stocks. The plan does not hold any SpartanNash stock.

During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2015, terminated vested participants of the Cash Balance Pension Plantriggered, and the Super Foods Plan were offeredresulting settlement expense is recorded as a temporary opportunity to elect to receive a lumpcomponent of total pension expense (income). Lump sum distribution. As a result, distributions of $10.6$3.3 million, $2.6 million and $2.8 million were made and a resulting pension settlement chargecharges of $1.6$0.8 million, was$0.5 million and $0.7 million were incurred in fiscal 2014.2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Postretirement Medical Plans

SpartanNash Company and certain subsidiaries provide healthcare benefits to retired associates who were not covered by collective bargaining arrangements during their employment (“covered associates”) under the SpartanNash Company Retiree Medical Plan (“SpartanNash(the “Retiree Medical Plan”). Former Spartan Stores, Inc. associates hired prior to January 1, 2002 who were not covered by CBAs during their employment and who have at least 30 years of service or 10 years of service and have attained age 55 and who were not covered by collective bargaining arrangements during their employment,upon retirement qualify as covered“covered associates. Qualified covered” Covered associates thatwho retired prior to March 31, 1992 receive major medical insurance with deductible and coinsurance provisions until age 65 and Medicare supplemental benefits thereafter. Covered associates retiring after April 1, 1992 are eligible for monthly postretirement healthcare benefits of $5 multiplied by the associate’s years of service. This benefit is in the form of a credit against the monthly insurance premium. The retiree pays the balance of the premium. Associates hired after December 31, 2001 are not eligible for these benefits.

-61-


The following tables set forth the actuarial present value of benefit obligations, funded status, changechanges in benefit obligation, change inobligations and plan assets, weighted average assumptions used in actuarial calculations and components of net periodic benefit costs for the Company’s significant pension and postretirement benefit plans, excluding multi-employer plans. The prepaid, current accrued, and noncurrent accrued benefit costs associated with pension and postretirement benefits are reported in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets,” “Other assets, net,” “Accrued payroll and benefits,” and “Postretirement benefits,” respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension Plan

 

 

Retiree Medical Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Funded Status

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected/Accumulated benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

80,153

 

 

$

 

80,350

 

 

$

 

10,199

 

 

$

 

9,663

 

Service cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

195

 

 

 

 

184

 

Interest cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,283

 

 

 

 

2,345

 

 

 

 

339

 

 

 

 

345

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,578

)

 

 

 

4,662

 

 

 

 

(961

)

 

 

 

303

 

Benefits paid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,583

)

 

 

 

(7,204

)

 

 

 

(329

)

 

 

 

(296

)

Balance at end of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

73,275

 

 

$

 

80,153

 

 

$

 

9,443

 

 

$

 

10,199

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

81,255

 

 

$

 

81,982

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

Actual (loss) return on plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(931

)

 

 

 

6,477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

329

 

 

 

 

296

 

Benefits paid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,583

)

 

 

 

(7,204

)

 

 

 

(329

)

 

 

 

(296

)

Balance at end of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

74,241

 

 

$

 

81,255

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

Funded (unfunded) status

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

966

 

 

$

 

1,102

 

 

$

 

(9,443

)

 

$

 

(10,199

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Components of net amount recognized in consolidated balance sheets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

966

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

Noncurrent assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(437

)

 

 

 

(417

)

Noncurrent liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,006

)

 

 

 

(9,782

)

Net asset (liability)

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

966

 

 

$

 

1,102

 

 

$

 

(9,443

)

 

$

 

(10,199

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in AOCI:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

19,885

 

 

$

 

18,205

 

 

$

 

629

 

 

$

 

1,678

 

Prior service credit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(92

)

 

 

 

(250

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

$

 

19,885

 

 

$

 

18,205

 

 

$

 

537

 

 

$

 

1,428

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average assumptions at measurement date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.48%

 

 

3.45%

 

 

4.41%

 

 

3.72%

 

Ultimate health care cost trend rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

5.00%

 

 

5.00%

 

-62-


 

 

Pension Plan

 

 

Retiree Medical Plan

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Components of net periodic benefit cost (income):

 

Service cost

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

195

 

 

$

 

184

 

 

$

 

187

 

Interest cost

 

 

2,283

 

 

 

 

2,345

 

 

 

 

2,977

 

 

 

 

339

 

 

 

 

345

 

 

 

 

345

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(158

)

 

 

 

(158

)

 

 

 

(158

)

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(3,631

)

 

 

 

(3,836

)

 

 

 

(4,269

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized actuarial net loss

 

 

417

 

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

 

706

 

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

42

 

Net periodic benefit (income) cost

$

 

(931

)

 

$

 

(1,270

)

 

$

 

(586

)

 

$

 

464

 

 

$

 

430

 

 

$

 

416

 

Settlement expense

 

 

785

 

 

 

 

548

 

 

 

 

692

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total net periodic benefit (income) cost

$

 

(146

)

 

$

 

(722

)

 

$

 

106

 

 

$

 

464

 

 

$

 

430

 

 

$

 

416

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost (income):

 

Discount rate

3.45%

 

 

3.82%

 

 

4.04%

 

 

3.72%

 

 

4.26%

 

 

4.55%

 

Expected return on plan assets

4.84%

 

 

4.83%

 

 

5.05%

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

-64-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

SpartanNash Company Pension Plan

 

 

SpartanNash Medical Plan

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015 *

 

 

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

Funded Status

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected/Accumulated benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

 

93,034

 

 

$

 

102,501

 

 

$

 

9,905

 

 

$

 

7,967

 

Service cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

231

 

 

 

 

186

 

Interest cost

 

 

3,325

 

 

 

 

4,223

 

 

 

 

404

 

 

 

 

394

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

(4,985

)

 

 

 

5,959

 

 

 

 

(1,117

)

 

 

 

1,593

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(7,976

)

 

 

 

(19,649

)

 

 

 

(244

)

 

 

 

(235

)

Balance at end of year

$

 

83,398

 

 

$

 

93,034

 

 

$

 

9,179

 

 

$

 

9,905

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

 

93,718

 

 

$

 

105,949

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

(1,639

)

 

 

 

5,093

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company contributions

 

 

650

 

 

 

 

2,325

 

 

 

 

244

 

 

 

 

235

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(7,976

)

 

 

 

(19,649

)

 

 

 

(244

)

 

 

 

(235

)

Balance at end of year

$

 

84,753

 

 

$

 

93,718

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

Funded (unfunded) status

$

 

1,355

 

 

$

 

684

 

 

$

 

(9,179

)

 

$

 

(9,905

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Components of net amount recognized in financial position:

 

Noncurrent assets

$

 

1,355

 

 

$

 

7,220

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(340

)

 

 

 

(319

)

Noncurrent liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,536

)

 

 

 

(8,839

)

 

 

 

(9,586

)

Net asset/(liability)

$

 

1,355

 

 

$

 

684

 

 

$

 

(9,179

)

 

$

 

(9,905

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income:

 

Net actuarial loss

$

 

17,322

 

 

$

 

16,572

 

 

$

 

1,263

 

 

$

 

2,554

 

Prior service credit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(566

)

 

 

 

(724

)

 

$

 

17,322

 

 

$

 

16,572

 

 

$

 

697

 

 

$

 

1,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average assumptions at measurement date:

 

Discount rate

4.04%

 

 

3.60%/3.85%

 

 

4.55%

 

 

4.15%

 

Expected return on plan assets

5.05%

 

 

5.50%

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* The amounts above reflect the combined values of the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Super Foods Plan as of January 3, 2015. On December 31, 2014, the Super Foods Plan was merged into the Cash Balance Pension Plan and renamed the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan. At the time of merger, the accumulated benefit obligations of the Cash Balance Pension Plan and Super Foods Plan were $52.4 million and $40.6 million, respectively, and the fair value of the plan assets for the Cash Balance Pension Plan and Super Foods Plan were $59.7 million and $34.0 million, respectively.

 

 

-65-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accumulated benefit obligation for the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan was $83.4 million and $93.0 million at January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015, respectively.

Components of net periodic benefit cost (income)

 

SpartanNash Company Pension Plan

 

 

SpartanNash Medical Plan

 

 

January 2,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

January 2,

 

 

January 3,

 

 

December 28,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2013

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2013

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks) (a)

 

 

(39 Weeks) (a)

 

 

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

Service cost

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

231

 

 

$

 

186

 

 

$

 

194

 

Interest cost

 

 

3,325

 

 

 

 

4,223

 

 

 

 

1,916

 

 

 

 

404

 

 

 

 

394

 

 

 

 

287

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(158

)

 

 

 

(158

)

 

 

 

(42

)

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(4,923

)

 

 

 

(5,737

)

 

 

 

(3,327

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized actuarial net loss

 

 

827

 

 

 

 

970

 

 

 

 

976

 

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

134

 

Net periodic benefit

$

 

(771

)

 

$

 

(544

)

 

$

 

(435

)

 

$

 

651

 

 

$

 

442

 

 

$

 

573

 

Settlement expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,588

 

 

 

 

621

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total expense (income)

$

 

(771

)

 

$

 

2,044

 

 

$

 

186

 

 

$

 

651

 

 

$

 

442

 

 

$

 

573

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average assumptions at measurement date:

 

Discount rate

3.75%

 

 

4.35%/4.65%

 

(b)

3.90%/4.60%

 

(b)

4.15%

 

 

5.05%

 

 

3.90%

 

Expected return on plan assets

5.50%

 

 

5.95%/5.70%

 

(b)

6.55%/6.00%

 

(b)

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On December 31, 2014, the Super Foods Plan was merged into the Cash Balance Pension Plan and renamed the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan.

 

(a) Amounts reflect the combined values of the Cash Balance Pension Plan and Super Foods Plan.

 

(b) Amounts reflect the assumptions used for the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Super Foods Plan, respectively.

 

The net actuarial loss and prior service cost included in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”AOCI and expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost during fiscal year 2016in 2019 are as follows:

 

SpartanNash Company

 

 

SpartanNash

 

(In thousands)

Pension Plan

 

 

Medical Plan

 

Prior service credit

$

 

 

 

$

 

(158

)

Net actuarial loss

 

 

111

 

 

 

 

42

 

 

Retiree

(In thousands)

Pension Plan

Medical Plan

Prior service credit

$

N/A

$

(92

)

Net actuarial loss

207

Prior service costs (credits) are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of active participants. Actuarial gains and losses for the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan are amortized over the average remaining service life of activeall participants when the accumulation of such gains and losses exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation and the fairmarket-related value of plan assets.

Assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the postretirement plan.Retiree Medical Plan. Assumed current healthcare cost trend rates used to determine net periodic benefit cost (income) were as follows:

 

January 2, 2016

 

January 3, 2015

 

December 28, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Pre-65

 

7.50%

 

7.75%

 

8.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

7.50%

Post-65

 

8.40%

 

6.85%

 

7.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.00%

 

8.40%

 

8.40%

The effect of a one-percentage point increase or decrease in assumed healthcare cost trend rates on the total service and interest components and the post-retirement benefit obligations would be less than $0.1 million.

-66-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Expected Return on Assets and Investment Strategy

The Company has assumed an average long-term expected return on the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan assets of 5.05%2.80% as of January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018. The expected return assumption was modeled by third-party investment portfolio managers, based on asset allocations and the expected return and risk components of the various asset classes in the portfolio. Determining projected stock and bond returns and then applying these returns to the target asset allocations of the plan assets developed the expected return. Equity returns were based primarily on historical returns of the S&P 500 Index. Fixed-income projected returns were based primarily on historical returns for the broad U.S. bond market. This overall return assumption is believed to be reasonable over a longer-term period that is consistent with the liabilities.

-63-


The Company has historically followed an investment policy for the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan with a long-term asset allocation mix designed to meet the long-term retirement obligations by investing in equity, fixed income and other securities to cover cash flow requirements of the plan and minimize long-term costs. TheIn the current year, in the context of the Pension Plan termination and the expected distribution of the related assets, the Company has revised the asset mix to include a higher allocation mix is reviewed periodicallyof fixed income securities, which reduce the Pension Plan’s exposure to market volatility. Certain of the fixed income investments have a duration of 90 days or less, and on a regular basis, actual allocationsas such are rebalanced to approximate the prevailing targets.classified as cash equivalents. The following table summarizes both the targeted allocation of the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan’s weighted-average asset allocation by asset category and actual allocations as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015:December 30, 2017:

 

Target

 

Actual

 

Target *

 

Actual

December 29,

 

December 29,

 

December 30,

Asset Category

 

January 2, 2016

 

January 2, 2016

 

January 3, 2015 **

2018

 

2018

 

2017

Equity securities

 

 

20.0

 

%

 

 

30.6

 

%

 

 

30.9

 

%

 

 

%

 

 

 

%

 

 

19.3

 

%

Fixed income

 

 

80.0

 

 

 

 

68.5

 

 

 

 

68.7

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

 

80.7

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

Total

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

100.0

 

%

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* At the end of fiscal 2015, the Company updated the target allocation of the SpartanNash Company Pension Plan investment portfolio to reduce its return-seeking equity securities to approximate a 20% allocation. The Company intends to continually evaluate financial market conditions and prudently transition the pension plan assets to the new target allocation.

** The amounts reflect the combined range of the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Super Foods Plan as of January 3, 2015.

The investment policy emphasizes the following key objectives: (1) provide benefit security to participants by maximizing the return on plan assets at an acceptable risk level, (2) maintain adequate liquidity for current benefit payments, (3) avoid unexpected increases in pension expense, and (4) within the scope of the above objectives, minimize long term funding to the plan.

Upon the merger of the Cash Balance Pension Plan and the Super Foods Plan on December 31, 2014, a third-party fiduciary manages the plan assets under a pre-determined glide path based on funded status, interest rates, mortality tables and expected return on assets.

The fair values of the pension planPension Plan assets at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015,December 30, 2017, by asset category, are as follows:

Fair Value of Assets as of January 2, 2016

 

 

 

 

Fair Value of Assets as of December 29, 2018

 

(In thousands)

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

NAV (a)

 

Mutual funds

$

 

9,401

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

9,401

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

20,124

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

20,124

 

Pooled funds

 

 

58,355

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,355

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,576

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,576

 

Money market fund

 

 

799

 

 

 

 

 

 

799

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,992

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,992

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed annuity contract

 

 

16,198

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,198

 

Guaranteed annuity contracts

 

 

 

 

 

12,549

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,549

 

 

 

 

 

Total fair value

$

 

84,753

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

68,555

 

 

$

 

16,198

 

 

 

 

$

 

74,241

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

11,992

 

 

$

 

12,549

 

 

$

 

49,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value of Assets as of January 3, 2015

 

 

 

 

Fair Value of Assets as of December 30, 2017

 

(In thousands)

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

NAV (a)

 

Mutual funds

$

 

29,851

 

 

$

 

29,851

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

18,194

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

18,194

 

Pooled funds

 

 

45,737

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45,737

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48,133

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48,133

 

Money market fund

 

 

381

 

 

 

 

 

 

381

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,037

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,037

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed annuity contract

 

 

17,749

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,749

 

Guaranteed annuity contracts

 

 

 

 

 

13,891

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,891

 

 

 

 

 

Total fair value

$

 

93,718

 

 

$

 

29,851

 

 

$

 

46,118

 

 

$

 

17,749

 

 

 

 

$

 

81,255

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

1,037

 

 

$

 

13,891

 

 

$

 

66,327

 

-67-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  (a)

Assets are measured at net asset value (“NAV”) (or its equivalent) on a non-active market, and therefore, have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.

Level 3 assets consistedconsist of the guaranteed annuity contracts. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for Level 3 assets is as follows:

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 29, 2018

 

 

December 30, 2017

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

 

17,749

 

 

$

 

18,071

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

 

13,891

 

 

$

 

15,426

 

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

 

 

(2,227

)

 

 

(1,402

)

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

 

 

(1,712

)

 

 

(2,222

)

Interest income

 

 

680

 

 

 

799

 

Interest income

 

 

588

 

 

 

552

 

Unrealized (losses) gains

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

281

 

Unrealized gains

Unrealized gains

 

 

(218

)

 

 

 

135

 

Balance at end of year

$

 

16,198

 

 

$

 

17,749

 

Balance at end of year

$

 

12,549

 

 

$

 

13,891

 

See Note 78 for a discussion of the levels of the fair value hierarchy. The assets’ fair value measurement level aboveused is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is a description of the valuation methods used for the plans’Pension Plan’s assets measured at fair value in the above tables:

Cash & moneyMoney market funds:fund: The carrying value approximates fair value. Money market funds are valued on a daily basis at the net asset value (“NAV”)NAV using the amortized cost of the securities held in the fund. BecauseSince amortized cost does not meet the criteria for an active market, money market funds are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy of ASC 820.

-64-


Mutual Funds: These investments are valued using NAV as a practical expedient to estimate fair value and are not classified in the fair value hierarchy. NAV which is determined once a day after the closing of the exchange based upon the underlying assets in the fund, less the fund’s liabilities, expressed on a per-share basis. Funds for whichMutual funds held by the Pension Plan are open end mutual funds that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These funds are required to publish their daily NAV is a quoted price in an active marketand to transact at that price. The mutual funds held by the Pension Plan are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy of ASC 820. Funds which are not publicly traded in an active market are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy of ASC 820.therefore deemed to be actively traded.

Pooled Funds: The plan holds units of various Aon Hewitt Group Trust Funds offered through a private placement. The units are valued daily using the NAV. The NAV’sNAV as a practical expedient to estimate fair value. NAVs are based on the fair value of each fund’s underlying investments. Level 1 assetsinvestments and are priced using quotesnot classified in the fair value hierarchy. The practical expedient is not used when it is determined to be probable that the investment will be sold for trades occurring in active markets foran amount different than the identical asset. Level 2 assets are priced using observable inputs for the asset (for example, interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs). Level 3 assets are priced using unobservable inputs.reported NAV.

Guaranteed Annuity Contracts: The guaranteed annuity contracts are immediate participation contracts held with insurance companies that act as custodian of the pension plans’Pension Plan’s assets. The guaranteed annuity contracts are stated at contract value asvalues, which are determined by the custodians whichand approximate fair values. The Company evaluates the general financial condition of the custodians as a component of validating whether the calculated contract value is an accurate approximation of fair value. The review of the general financial condition of the custodians is considered obtainable/observable through the review of readily available financial information the custodians are required to file with the SEC. The group annuity contracts are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy of ASC 820.

The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuations methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement.

The Company does not expectexpects to make any contributions in 2019 of $0.4 million to the SpartanNashRetiree Medical Plan. The Company expects to make contributions in 2019 of between $0 and $0.5 million to the Pension Plan independing on actual termination costs and the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.value of Pension Plan assets upon final distribution.

The following estimated benefit payments are expected to be paid in the following fiscal years:

 

(In thousands)

Pension Benefits

 

 

Post-retirement Benefits

 

2016

$

 

8,884

 

 

$

 

340

 

2017

 

 

8,545

 

 

 

 

385

 

2018

 

 

7,780

 

 

 

 

431

 

2019

 

 

7,336

 

 

 

 

476

 

2020

 

 

6,933

 

 

 

 

518

 

2021 to 2025

 

 

29,704

 

 

 

 

3,092

 

(In thousands)

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024 to 2028

 

Pension benefits

$

 

74,570

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

Post-retirement medical benefits

 

 

437

 

 

 

 

480

 

 

 

 

520

 

 

 

 

557

 

 

 

 

590

 

 

 

 

3,283

 

-68-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIESFuture benefit payments of pension benefits in 2019 include routine benefit payments as well as lump sum distributions and annuitization in connection with the Plan termination.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Multi-Employer Health and Welfare Plans

In addition to the plans described above, the Company participates in the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan (“Central States Plan” or “the Plan”), the Michigan Conference of Teamsters and Ohio Conference of Teamsters Health and Welfare plans (collectively referred to as “multi-employer plans”), and other company-sponsored defined contribution plans for most associates covered by collective bargaining agreements.

plans. The Company contributes to these multi-employer plans under the terms contained in existing collective bargaining agreementsCBAs and in the amounts set forth within these agreements. The health and welfare plans provide medical, dental, pharmacy, vision, and other ancillary benefits to active associates and retirees, as determined by the trustees of the plan. The vast majority of the Company’s contributions benefitslargely benefit active associates, and as such, may not constitute contributions to a postretirement benefit plan. However, the Company is unable to separate contribution amounts tofor postretirement benefit plansbenefits from contribution amounts paid for active participants in the plan. These plans have a significant surplus of funds held in reserve in excess of claims incurred, and there is no potential withdrawal liability related to the Company’s participation in the plans. With respect to the Company’s participation in these plans, expense is recognized as contributions are funded. The Company contributed $13.8 million, $14.1 million and $14.3 million to these plans in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

-65-


Multi-Employer Pension Plan

The Company also contributes to the Central States Plan, a multi-employer plan defined previously, under the terms of CBAs that cover its union-represented associates and in the amounts set forth within these agreements. The Company is party to four CBAs that require contributions to the Plan with expiration dates ranging from April 2019 to January 2022 or which the Company is in the process of negotiating and have a contemplated expiration date of February 2022. These CBAs cover warehouse personnel and drivers in Grand Rapids, Michigan and Bellefontaine and Lima, Ohio. With respect to the Company’s participation in the Central States Plan (EIN 36-60442343 / Pension Plan Number 001), expense is recognized as contributions are funded. The Company contributed $12.9$13.3 million, $12.9$13.4 million and $6.8$13.4 million to this plan for fiscal years ended January 2,in 2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and forrespectively. The contributions made by the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively. Company represent less than five percent of the Plan’s total contributions in 2018.

The risk of participating in a multi-employer pension plan is different from the risk associated with single-employer plans in the following respects:

 

a.

Assets contributed to the multi-employer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to associatesemployees of other participating employers.

 

b.

If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.

 

c.

If a company chooses to stop participating in somea multi-employer plans, orplan, makes market exits such as closing a distribution center without opening another one in the same locale, or otherwise has participation in the plan drop below certain levels, the company may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.

The Company’s participation in the Central States Plan is outlined in the tables below, which provide additional information about the collective bargaining agreements associated with this multi-employer plan in which the Company participates. The EIN/Pension Plan Number column provides the Employee Identification Number (“EIN”) and the three-digit plan number, if applicable. Unless otherwise noted, the most recent Pension Protection Act (“PPA”)PPA zone status available in 2015 and 2014 relates toof the Plans’ two most recent fiscal year-ends. The zone statusPlan, which is based on information that the Company received from the Plan and is certified by each plan’s actuary.the Plan’s actuary, is “critical and declining” for the Plan’s two most recent fiscal years ending December 31, 2018 and 2017. Among other factors, redplans in the “critical and declining” zone status plans are generally less than 65% funded and are considered in critical status. The FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented column indicates plans for which a financial improvement plan (“FIP”) or aprojected to become insolvent within the next 15 years (or 20 years depending on the ratio of active-to-inactive participants). A rehabilitation plan (“RP”) is either pending or has been implemented by the trustees of each plan. On December 13, 2014, Congress passed the Multi-employer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (“MPRA”). The MPRA is intended to address funding shortfalls in both multi-employer pension plansPlan, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. BecauseCBAs that cover warehouse personnel and drivers in the MPRA is a complex piece of legislation, its effects onBellefontaine and Lima, Ohio distribution centers have permanent surcharges imposed due to the planfailure to adopt the trustee recommended rehabilitation plan. Refer to Note 9, Commitments and potential implications for the Company are not known at this time. See Note 8Contingencies, for further information regarding the Company’s participation in the Central States Plan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

 

 

Plan

 

Pension

 

FIP / RP

 

 

 

Associates under

 

 

 

 

 

Month /

 

Protection Act

 

Status

 

 

 

Collective

 

 

Over 5%

EIN - Pension

 

Day End

 

Zone Status

 

Pending /

 

 

 

Bargaining

 

 

Contribution

Plan Number

 

Date

 

2015

 

2014

 

Implemented

 

Expiration Dates

 

Agreement

 

 

2015

36-6044243-001 (a)

 

12/31

 

Red

 

Red

 

Implemented

 

2/2017 to 10/2017

 

 

9%

 

 

No

(a)

SpartanNash is party to four collective-bargaining agreements that require contributions to the Central States Plan. These agreements cover warehouse personnel and drivers in Grand Rapids, Michigan, Bellefontaine, Ohio and Lima, Ohio distribution centers. In the last contract negotiation, the Agreement covering the Bellefontaine facility warehouse associates was consolidated into the General Merchandise Services (“GMS”) Agreement. The collective-bargaining agreement that covers warehouse personnel and drivers in the Grand Rapids, Michigan distribution center has no surcharges imposed or amortization provisions while the agreements that cover warehouse personnel and drivers in the Bellefontaine, Ohio and Lima, Ohio distribution centers do have surcharges imposed or amortization provisions.

As of the date the consolidated financial statements were issued, Form 5500 was generally not available for the plan year ended in 2015.December 31, 2018.

-69-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1112 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income or Loss

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”)AOCI represents the cumulative balance of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, as of the end of the reporting period and relates to pension and other postretirement benefit obligation adjustments.

Changes in AOCI are as follows:

 

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

Balance at beginning of the fiscal year, net of tax

$

 

(11,655

)

 

$

 

(8,794

)

 

$

 

(13,687

)

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications

 

 

(455

)

 

 

 

(8,195

)

 

 

 

6,604

 

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

114

 

 

 

 

3,138

 

 

 

 

(2,525

)

Other comprehensive income, net of tax, before reclassifications

 

 

(341

)

 

 

 

(5,057

)

 

 

 

4,079

 

Amortization of amounts included in net periodic benefit cost (1)

 

 

884

 

 

 

 

3,410

 

 

 

 

1,712

 

Income tax expense (2)

 

 

(335

)

 

 

 

(1,214

)

 

 

 

(898

)

Amounts reclassified out of AOCI, net of tax

 

 

549

 

 

 

 

2,196

 

 

 

 

814

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

208

 

 

 

 

(2,861

)

 

 

 

4,893

 

Balance at end of the fiscal year, net of tax

$

 

(11,447

)

 

$

 

(11,655

)

 

$

 

(8,794

)

(In thousands)

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Balance at beginning of the year, net of tax

$

 

(15,136

)

 

$

 

(11,437

)

 

$

 

(11,447

)

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

 

 

(2,026

)

 

 

 

(2,448

)

 

 

 

(643

)

Income tax benefit

 

 

458

 

 

 

 

934

 

 

 

 

236

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax, before reclassifications

 

 

(1,568

)

 

 

 

(1,514

)

 

 

 

(407

)

Amortization of amounts included in net periodic benefit cost (a)

 

 

1,204

 

 

 

 

799

 

 

 

 

657

 

Income tax expense (b)

 

 

(259

)

 

 

 

(302

)

 

 

 

(240

)

Amounts reclassified out of AOCI, net of tax

 

 

945

 

 

 

 

497

 

 

 

 

417

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

(623

)

 

 

 

(1,017

)

 

 

 

10

 

Reclassification of stranded tax effects (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,682

)

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year, net of tax

$

 

(15,759

)

 

$

 

(15,136

)

 

$

 

(11,437

)

(1)  (a)

Reclassified from AOCI into Other, net, or Selling, general and administrative expense. Amortization of amounts included in net periodic benefit cost includeincludes amortization of prior service cost and amortization of net actuarial loss, as reflected in Note 10 – Associate Retirement Plans.loss.

(2)  (b)

Reclassified from AOCI into Income taxes expense.

  (c)

Reclassification reflects the impact of ASU 2018-02, which allowed stranded tax effects from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to be reclassified from AOCI to retained earnings.

-66-


 

 

Note 1213Taxes on Income Tax

The income tax provision for continuing operations is made up of the following components:

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Currently payable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current income tax (benefit) expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

$

 

31,437

 

 

$

 

27,015

 

 

$

 

3,897

 

$

 

(1,607

)

 

$

 

366

 

 

$

 

22,936

 

State

 

 

3,144

 

 

 

 

777

 

 

 

 

510

 

 

 

1,107

 

 

 

 

528

 

 

 

 

3,210

 

Total currently payable

 

 

34,581

 

 

 

 

27,792

 

 

 

 

4,407

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(500

)

 

 

 

894

 

 

 

 

26,146

 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

3,255

 

 

 

 

3,362

 

 

 

531

 

 

 

8,370

 

 

 

(72,842

)

 

 

6,509

 

State

 

 

(743

)

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

 

(4,097

)

 

 

(963

)

 

 

 

(7,079

)

 

 

 

252

 

Total deferred

 

 

2,512

 

 

 

 

3,537

 

 

 

 

(3,566

)

Total

$

 

37,093

 

 

$

 

31,329

 

 

$

 

841

 

Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

7,407

 

 

 

 

(79,921

)

 

 

 

6,761

 

Total income tax expense (benefit)

$

 

6,907

 

 

$

 

(79,027

)

 

$

 

32,907

 

The effective income tax rates are different fromA reconciliation of the statutory federal rate to the effective rate is as follows:

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

Federal statutory income tax rate

 

21.0

 

%

 

 

35.0

 

%

 

 

35.0

 

%

State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

 

1.7

 

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

Stock compensation

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-deductible expenses

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

Domestic production activities deduction

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

Charitable product donations

 

(0.6

)

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

Other, net

 

(0.9

)

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

Federal rate change effect on deferred taxes

 

(1.2

)

 

 

 

19.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax credits

 

(1.8

)

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in tax contingencies

 

(2.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective income tax rate

 

17.0

 

%

 

 

60.0

 

%

 

 

36.6

 

%

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including, but not limited to reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, effective January 1, 2018. Shortly after the Tax Act was enacted, the SEC issued accounting guidance, which provides a one-year measurement period during which a company may complete its accounting for the impacts of the Tax Act. 

In connection with initial analysis of the impact of the Tax Act, the Company recorded a provisional discrete income tax ratesbenefit of $26.0 million in the period ended December 30, 2017 associated with the re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities as a result of the reduction in the U.S. federal corporate tax rate. In the third quarter of 2018, the Company completed its accounting for the following reasons:income tax effects of certain elements of the Tax Act, resulting in an income tax benefit of $0.5 million.

 

January 2, 2016

 

January 3, 2015

 

December 28, 2013

 

(52 Weeks)

 

(53 Weeks)

 

(39 Weeks)

Federal statutory income tax rate

 

35.0

 

%

 

 

35.0

 

%

 

 

35.0

 

%

State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

 

(112.7

)

 

Charitable product donations

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

 

(13.4

)

 

Non-deductible merger expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.3

 

 

Changes in tax contingencies

 

(0.1

)

 

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

 

36.9

 

 

Domestic production activities deduction

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

(8.6

)

 

Non-deductible expenses

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

Other, net

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

 

(1.7

)

 

Effective income tax rate

 

37.0

 

%

 

 

34.6

 

%

 

 

40.6

 

%

-70--67-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from temporary differences as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015December 30, 2017 are as follows:

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee benefits

$

 

29,218

 

 

$

 

29,842

 

 

 

 

$

 

17,330

 

 

$

 

19,311

 

Accrued workers' compensation

 

 

2,712

 

 

 

 

3,074

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,402

 

 

 

 

1,620

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

3,341

 

 

 

 

2,951

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,171

 

 

 

 

1,974

 

Intangible assets

 

 

326

 

 

 

 

1,128

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56

 

Restructuring

 

 

732

 

 

 

 

1,947

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,806

 

 

 

 

2,322

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

2,047

 

 

 

 

1,843

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,269

 

 

 

 

1,552

 

Accrued rent

 

 

3,884

 

 

 

 

4,635

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,196

 

 

 

 

3,853

 

Accrued insurance

 

 

866

 

 

 

 

1,107

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,150

 

 

 

 

921

 

State net operating loss carryforwards (a)

 

 

 

 

 

2,656

 

 

 

 

37

 

All other

 

 

6,804

 

 

 

 

5,627

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,917

 

 

 

 

2,688

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

49,930

 

 

 

 

52,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

42,897

 

 

 

 

34,334

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

 

43,201

 

 

 

 

47,860

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,315

 

 

 

 

34,199

 

Inventory

 

 

48,120

 

 

 

 

51,616

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,401

 

 

 

 

31,454

 

Goodwill

 

 

62,005

 

 

 

 

53,628

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,763

 

 

 

 

10,083

 

Convertible debt interest

 

 

524

 

 

 

 

789

 

Leases

 

 

12,279

 

 

 

 

10,585

 

Intangible assets

 

 

 

 

 

1,011

 

 

 

 

 

All other

 

 

401

 

 

 

 

1,402

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,661

 

 

 

 

648

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

166,530

 

 

 

 

165,880

 

 

 

 

 

 

92,151

 

 

 

 

76,384

 

Net deferred tax liability

$

 

(116,600

)

 

$

 

(113,726

)

 

 

 

$

 

49,254

 

 

$

 

42,050

 

  (a)

At December 29, 2018, the Company had gross state net operating losses in various taxing jurisdictions totaling $3.4 million, which expire in tax years 2021 through 2038 if not utilized.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

 

 

$

 

2,408

 

 

$

 

2,369

 

Gross increases - tax positions taken in prior years

 

 

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

 

213

 

Gross decreases - tax positions taken in prior years

 

 

 

 

 

(171

)

 

 

 

(123

)

Gross increases - tax positions taken in current year

 

 

 

 

 

894

 

 

 

 

872

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

 

 

 

 

(1,817

)

 

 

 

(923

)

Balance at end of year

 

 

 

$

 

1,477

 

 

$

 

2,408

 

 

(In thousands)

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

 

2,179

 

 

$

 

8,805

 

Gross increases - tax positions taken in prior years

 

 

186

 

 

 

 

161

 

Gross decreases - tax positions taken in prior years

 

 

(105

)

 

 

 

(5,812

)

Gross increases - tax positions taken in current year

 

 

660

 

 

 

 

650

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

 

(709

)

 

 

 

(1,625

)

Balance at end of year

$

 

2,211

 

 

$

 

2,179

 

Unrecognized tax benefits of $0.8$0.9 million are set to expire prior to December 31, 2016.28, 2019. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The amount recognized due to a lapse in the statute of limitations that reduced the Company’s effective income tax rate in 2018 was $1.0 million. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, that would reduce the Company’s effective income tax rate if recognized in future periods was $1.2$0.3 million as of January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018.

SpartanNash or its subsidiaries file income tax returns with federal, state and local tax authorities within the United States. With few exceptions, SpartanNash is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local examinations by tax authorities for fiscal years before March 26, 2011.the year ended January 3, 2015. Income tax returns related to the former Nash-Finch Company with few exceptions, are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local examinations by tax authorities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and earlier.authorities.

-68-


 

 

Note 1314 – Stock-Based Compensation

The Company hassponsors a shareholder-approved 10-year stock incentive plan covering 2,500,000 shares of SpartanNash’s common stock. The SpartanNash Company Stock Incentive Plan of 2015 (the “2015 Plan”) provides for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock awards, and other stock-based and stock-related awards to directors,

-71-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

officers and other key associates. Shares issued, as a result of stock option exercises, will be funded with the issuance of new shares. Holders of restricted stock and stock awards are entitled to participate in cash dividends and dividend equivalents. As of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, a total of 2,497,0271,475,633 shares remained unissued under the 2015 Plan.

All outstanding unvested stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock vest immediately upon a “Change in Control,” as defined by the Plan. The Company has not issued any stock options since 2009 and all outstanding options are vested.

The following table summarizes stock option activity for the three years ended January 2,2018, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Remaining

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

Shares

 

 

Exercise

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Intrinsic Value

 

 

Under Options

 

 

Price

 

 

Life Years

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Options outstanding at March 30, 2013

 

 

653,471

 

 

$

 

18.82

 

 

 

 

4.65

 

 

$

 

1,428

 

Exercised

 

 

(24,976

)

 

 

 

9.49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

298

 

Cancelled/Forfeited

 

 

(41,729

)

 

 

 

17.71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding and exercisable at December 28, 2013

 

 

586,766

 

 

 

 

19.30

 

 

 

 

4.01

 

 

 

 

2,965

 

Exercised

 

 

(88,152

)

 

 

 

12.68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

869

 

Cancelled/Forfeited

 

 

(4,131

)

 

 

 

3.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding and exercisable at January 3, 2015

 

 

494,483

 

 

 

 

20.61

 

 

 

 

3.30

 

 

 

 

2,772

 

Exercised

 

 

(185,627

)

 

 

 

19.72

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,543

 

Cancelled/Forfeited

 

 

(63

)

 

 

 

11.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding and exercisable at January 2, 2016

 

 

308,793

 

 

$

 

21.15

 

 

 

 

2.46

 

 

$

 

773

 

Vested and expected to vest in the future at January 2, 2016

 

 

308,793

 

 

$

 

21.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Remaining

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

Shares

 

 

Exercise

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Intrinsic Value

 

 

Under Options

 

 

Price

 

 

Life Years

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Options outstanding and exercisable at January 2, 2016

 

 

308,793

 

 

$

 

21.15

 

 

 

 

2.46

 

 

$

 

773

 

Exercised

 

 

(107,338

)

 

 

 

23.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,043

 

Cancelled/Expired

 

 

(938

)

 

 

 

14.36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2016

 

 

200,517

 

 

 

 

19.94

 

 

 

 

1.65

 

 

 

 

3,929

 

Exercised

 

 

(152,589

)

 

 

 

21.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,832

 

Cancelled/Expired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding and exercisable at December 30, 2017

 

 

47,928

 

 

 

 

16.52

 

 

 

 

1.07

 

 

 

 

487

 

Exercised

 

 

(20,476

)

 

 

 

13.87

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled/Expired

 

 

(14,400

)

 

 

 

22.69

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding and exercisable at December 29, 2018

 

 

13,052

 

 

$

 

13.87

 

 

 

 

0.37

 

 

$

 

39

 

Cash received from option exercises was $3.7$0.3 million, $1.1$3.2 million and $0.3$2.5 million during fiscal years ended January 2,in 2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.

Restricted shares awarded to associates vest ratably over a four-year service period and over one year for grants to the Board of Directors. Awards are subject to forfeiture and certain transfer restrictions prior to vesting. All shares fully vest upon a “Change in Control,” as defined by the Plan. Compensation expense, representing the fair value of the stock at the measurement date of the award, is recognized over the required service period. On December 17, 2013, the Board of Directors approved a modification to the outstanding restricted stock awards to provide for continued vesting upon retirement. As a result, incremental expense of $4.2 million was recognized to reflect the cumulative compensation expense recognized over the required service period of each restricted shareholder.

The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for fiscal years ended January 2, 20162018, 2017 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013:

2016:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant-Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant-Date

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Fair Value

 

Outstanding and nonvested at March 30, 2013

 

 

546,182

 

 

$

 

16.59

 

Outstanding and nonvested at January 2, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

637,555

 

 

$

 

24.75

 

Granted

 

 

227,207

 

 

 

18.07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

314,944

 

 

 

28.34

 

Vested

 

 

(225,600

)

 

 

16.94

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(255,156

)

 

 

24.56

 

Forfeited

 

 

(28,954

)

 

 

16.94

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(37,200

)

 

 

25.80

 

Outstanding and nonvested at December 28, 2013

 

 

518,835

 

 

 

23.56

 

Outstanding and nonvested at December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

660,143

 

 

 

26.48

 

Granted

 

 

317,827

 

 

 

22.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

296,297

 

 

 

34.68

 

Vested

 

 

(219,894

)

 

 

23.56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(258,183

)

 

 

25.90

 

Forfeited

 

 

(16,115

)

 

 

23.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(84,513

)

 

 

29.11

 

Outstanding and nonvested at January 3, 2015

 

 

600,653

 

 

 

23.08

 

Outstanding and nonvested at December 30, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

613,744

 

 

 

30.32

 

Granted

 

 

314,595

 

 

 

26.59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

482,572

 

 

 

17.00

 

Vested

 

 

(265,737

)

 

 

23.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(260,644

)

 

 

28.89

 

Forfeited

 

 

(11,956

)

 

 

23.85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12,853

)

 

 

23.52

 

Outstanding and nonvested at January 2, 2016

 

 

637,555

 

 

$

 

24.75

 

Outstanding and nonvested at December 29, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

822,819

 

 

$

 

23.07

 

-72-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The total fair value of shares vested during fiscal years ended January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 was $7.6$4.8 million, $4.7$9.3 million and $3.6$6.6 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Share-based-69-


Stock-based compensation expense recognized and included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of earnings,operations, and related tax benefits were as follows:

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Stock options

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

14

 

Restricted stock

 

 

7,240

 

 

 

6,939

 

 

 

6,937

 

 

 

 

$

 

7,646

 

 

$

 

9,611

 

 

$

 

7,936

 

Tax benefits

 

 

(2,758

)

 

 

 

(2,632

)

 

 

 

(2,640

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,242

)

 

 

 

(3,440

)

 

 

 

(2,976

)

$

 

4,482

 

 

$

 

4,307

 

 

$

 

4,311

 

Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

 

 

 

$

 

5,404

 

 

$

 

6,171

 

 

$

 

4,960

 

As of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based awards granted under the stock incentive plans was $5.6$4.2 million for restricted stock. The remaining compensation costs not yet recognized are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.4 years for restricted stock. All compensation costs related to stock options have been recognized.

The Company recognized tax deductions of $9.5$5.6 million, $5.9$11.6 million and $4.1$8.0 million related to the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock during fiscal years ended January 2,in 2018, 2017 and 2016, and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013, respectively.

The Company hassponsors a stock bonus plan covering 300,000 shares of SpartanNash common stock. Under the provisions of this plan, certain officers and key associates may elect to receive a portion of their annual bonus in common stock rather than cash and will be granted additional shares of common stock worth 20% of the portion of the bonus they elect to receive in stock. After the shares are issued, the holder is not able to sell or otherwise transfer the shares until the end of the holding period, which is currently 24 months. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the market price of the stock as of the measurement date. During the year, the Company authorized the issuance of an additional 45,000 shares to be granted by the stock bonus plan. A total of 47,92645,000 shares remained unissued under the stock bonus plan at January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018.

The Company also hassponsors an associate stock purchase plan covering 200,000 shares of SpartanNash common stock. The plan provides that associates of the Company may purchase shares at 95% of the fair market value. The associate stock purchase plan was suspended during the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013 in conjunction with the merger with Nash-Finch and cash balances were refunded to participants. The associate stock purchase plan was reinstated in April 2014. As of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, a total of 58,237100,412 shares had been issued under the plan.

Note 1415 – Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company providesmay provide financial assistance in the form of loans to some of itscertain independent retailers for inventories, store fixtures and equipment and store improvements. Loans are generally secured by liens on real estate, inventory and/or equipment, personal guarantees and other types of collateral, and are generally repayable over a period of five to seventen years. The Company establishes allowances for doubtful accounts based upon periodic assessments of the credit risk of specific customers, collateral value, historical trends and other information. The Company believes that adequate provisions have been recorded for any doubtful accounts. In addition, the Company may guarantee debt and lease obligations of independent retailers. In the event these retailers are unable to meet their debt service payments or otherwise experience an event of default, the Company would be unconditionally liable for the outstanding balance of their debt and lease obligations, which would be due in accordance with the underlying agreements.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may advance funds to certain independent retailers which are earned by the retailers primarily through achieving specified purchase volume requirements, as outlined in their supply agreements with the Company, or in limited instances, for remaining a SpartanNash customer for a specified time period. These advances must be repaid if the purchase volume requirements are not met or if the retailer no longer remains a customer for the specified time period. As of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the Company has guaranteedan unearned advanced amount to one independent retailer for an amount representing approximately two percent of the outstanding lease obligationsCompany’s total assets. The Company’s collateral related to the advanced funds is a security interest in select business assets of certainthe independent retailersretailer’s stores including select real property assets, and bank debt for oneother collateral, including a personal guarantee, from the shareholder. Despite the collateral, the Company may be unable to realize the entire unearned portion of the funds advanced to this independent retailer, and accordingly, has evaluated the net estimated realizability of the advance. During the fourth quarter of 2017, and in the amountcontext of $0.4 milliona state law receivership proceeding, the customer rationalized its retail store base and $2.0 million, respectively. These guarantees, which are secured by certain business assetsentered into a new supply agreement with the Company and personal guaranteesassumed the obligation of the respective retailers, representoriginal agreement. In the maximum undiscounted paymentsfourth quarter of 2018, the customer defaulted on the terms of the supply agreement. As a result, the Company would be requiredexercised its rights and filed a petition to makeplace the customer in the event of default.receivership. The Company believes these retailers will be able to perform under the lease agreements and that no payments will be required and no loss will be incurred under the guarantees. A liability representing the fair valueperformed an analysis of the obligations assumed undernet realizability of the guarantees is includedunderlying collateral which resulted in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. a $32.0 million charge in 2018.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company also subleases and assigns various leases to third parties. As of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the Company estimates the present value of its maximum potential obligations for subleases and assigned leases to be approximately $21.3$5.9 million and $17.5$14.1 million, respectively.

-73--70-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note 1516 – Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Supplemental cash flow information is as follows:

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

(In thousands)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(39 Weeks)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Non-cash financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted stock to associates and directors

$

 

8,361

 

 

$

 

7,191

 

 

$

 

4,106

 

Issuance of note payable on purchase of assets

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

3,236

 

 

 

2,423

 

 

 

1,493

 

Issuance of note payable as consideration for acquisition

$

 

 

 

$

 

2,460

 

 

$

 

 

Recognition of investment in direct financing lease

 

 

 

 

 

2,295

 

 

 

 

Recognition of capital lease obligations

 

 

3,304

 

 

 

588

 

 

 

3,536

 

Derecognition of capital lease obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,068

)

Deferred gain on derecognition of capital lease obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,052

 

Non-cash investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable

 

 

8,896

 

 

 

3,370

 

 

 

16,522

 

 

 

4,564

 

 

 

5,418

 

 

 

5,465

 

Receipt of notes receivable on sale of assets

 

 

4,531

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derecognition of fixed assets under direct financing lease

 

 

 

 

 

2,295

 

 

 

 

Capital lease asset additions

 

 

3,236

 

 

 

2,423

 

 

 

1,493

 

 

 

3,304

 

 

 

588

 

 

 

3,536

 

Issuance of common stock related to the Nash-Finch merger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

379,600

 

Capital lease asset disposals

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,016

)

Acquisition financed through issuance of note payable

 

 

 

 

 

2,460

 

 

 

 

Other supplemental cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

 

19,178

 

 

 

22,990

 

 

 

7,765

 

 

 

28,138

 

 

 

22,818

 

 

 

16,184

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

 

23,531

 

 

 

 

27,429

 

 

 

 

13,951

 

Net cash paid for taxes

 

 

139

 

 

 

 

10,657

 

 

 

 

35,836

 

 

Note 1617 – Reporting Segment Information

SpartanNash sells and distributes products that are typically found in supermarkets.supermarkets and discount stores. The operating segments reflect the manner in which the business is managed and how the Company allocates resources and assesses performance internally. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer.Officer, who determines the allocation of resources and, through a regular review of financial information, assesses the performance of the operating segments. The business is classified by management into three reportable segments: Military, Food Distribution, Military and Retail. These reportable segments are three distinct businesses, each with a different customer base, management structure, and management structure.basis for determining budgets, forecasts, and executive compensation. The Company reviews its reportable segments on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate a change in reportable segments has occurred.

The Company’s Food Distribution segment, consisting of 1214 distribution centers as well as facilities to process fresh produce, proteins, and meal kits, supplies a diverse group of independent retail locations and corporate-owned retail stores withgrocery products, including dry groceries, produce, dairy products, meat, deli,delicatessen items, bakery goods, frozen food, seafood, floral products, general merchandise, pharmacy, andbeverages, tobacco products, health and beauty care items.products and pharmacy primarily to a diverse group of independent and chain retailers, food service distributors and the Company’s corporate owned retail stores. The Company also offers certain value-added services (e.g., accounting, payroll, marketing, etc.) to its independent retail customers. These services are not material to the Company’s financial statements. Sales to independent retail customersretailers and inter-segment sales are recorded based upon both a “cost plus” model and a “variable mark-up” model, which vary by commodity and servicing distribution center. To supply its wholesale customers, the Company operates a fleet of tractors, conventional trailers and refrigerated trailers.trailers and also provides managed freight solutions.

The Military segment contracts with manufacturers and brokers to distribute a wide variety of grocery products, including dry groceries, beverages, meat, and frozen foods, primarily to U.S. military commissaries and exchanges from its 7 distribution centers.centers, two of which are shared with the Food Distribution segment. The contracts typically specify the commissaries and exchanges to supply on behalf of the manufacturer, the manufacturer’s products to be supplied, service and delivery requirements and pricing and payment terms.terms. The Company is also the DeCA exclusive worldwide supplier of private brand grocery and related products to U.S. military commissaries. The Company procures the grocery and related products from various manufacturers, and upon receiving customer orders from DeCA, either delivers the products to the U.S. military commissaries itself or partners with Coastal Pacific Food Distributors to deliver the products on its behalf.

The Retail segment operates 163 corporate-ownedoperated 139 corporate owned retail stores and 29 fuel centers, predominantly in the Midwest and Great Lakes.region, as of December 29, 2018. The Company’s retail stores typically offer dry groceries, produce, dairy products, meat, delicatessen items, bakery goods, frozen food, seafood, floral products, general merchandise, beverages, tobacco products and health and beauty care products, delicatessen items and bakery goods. Pharmacy services areproducts. The Company also offered pharmacy services in 91 corporate-owned83 of its corporate owned retail stores.stores as of December 29, 2018.

Identifiable assets represent total assets directly associated with the reporting segments. Eliminations in assets identified to segments include intercompany receivables, payables and investments.

-74--71-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following tables set forth information about the Company by reporting segment:

 

 

 

 

 

Food

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

Military

 

 

Distribution

 

 

Retail

 

 

Total

 

Distribution

 

 

Military

 

 

Retail

 

 

Total

 

Year Ended January 2, 2016 (52 Weeks):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales to external customers

$

 

2,207,161

 

 

$

 

3,305,094

 

 

$

 

2,139,718

 

 

$

 

7,651,973

 

$

 

3,991,450

 

 

$

 

2,166,843

 

 

$

 

1,906,259

 

 

$

 

8,064,552

 

Inter-segment sales

 

 

 

 

 

973,512

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

973,512

 

 

 

842,934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

842,934

 

Merger integration and acquisition expenses

 

 

 

 

 

2,037

 

 

 

 

6,396

 

 

 

8,433

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

3,581

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,352

 

 

 

4,937

 

Restructuring charges (gains), asset impairment and other charges

 

 

33,056

 

 

 

 

(801

)

 

 

5,291

 

 

 

37,546

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

12,081

 

 

 

26,127

 

 

 

 

45,126

 

 

 

83,334

 

 

 

32,073

 

 

 

 

11,968

 

 

 

38,812

 

 

 

82,853

 

Operating earnings

 

 

17,059

 

 

 

78,841

 

 

 

 

26,975

 

 

 

122,875

 

 

 

48,752

 

 

 

 

5,647

 

 

 

16,113

 

 

 

70,512

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

3,768

 

 

 

17,967

 

 

 

 

57,659

 

 

 

79,394

 

 

 

33,271

 

 

 

 

3,530

 

 

 

34,694

 

 

 

71,495

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended January 3, 2015 (53 weeks):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales to external customers

$

 

2,275,512

 

 

$

 

3,356,331

 

 

$

 

2,284,219

 

 

$

 

7,916,062

 

$

 

3,827,909

 

 

$

 

2,144,022

 

 

$

 

1,991,868

 

 

$

 

7,963,799

 

Inter-segment sales

 

 

 

 

 

1,005,844

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,005,844

 

 

 

885,872

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

885,872

 

Merger integration and acquisition expenses

 

 

27

 

 

 

12,644

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

12,675

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

6,244

 

 

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

335

 

 

 

8,101

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

189,027

 

 

 

189,027

 

Restructuring charges and asset impairment

 

 

1,317

 

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

37,615

 

 

 

39,432

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

11,350

 

 

 

29,816

 

 

 

 

45,828

 

 

 

86,994

 

 

 

30,255

 

 

 

 

11,626

 

 

 

41,359

 

 

 

83,240

 

Operating earnings

 

 

21,721

 

 

 

54,802

 

 

 

 

38,323

 

 

 

114,846

 

Operating earnings (loss)

 

 

83,115

 

 

 

 

6,969

 

 

 

(196,759

)

 

 

(106,675

)

Capital expenditures

 

 

15,088

 

 

 

31,953

 

 

 

 

42,971

 

 

 

90,012

 

 

 

25,990

 

 

 

 

6,482

 

 

 

38,434

 

 

 

70,906

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period Ended December 28, 2013 (39 Weeks):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales to external customers

$

 

248,643

 

 

$

 

1,095,759

 

 

$

 

1,252,828

 

 

$

 

2,597,230

 

$

 

3,281,025

 

 

$

 

2,197,014

 

 

$

 

2,083,045

 

 

$

 

7,561,084

 

Inter-segment sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

533,470

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

533,470

 

 

 

918,095

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

918,095

 

Merger integration and acquisition expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,993

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

3,703

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

3,255

 

 

 

 

6,959

 

Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment

 

 

5,068

 

 

 

 

(473

)

 

 

 

27,521

 

 

 

 

32,116

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,412

 

 

 

 

7,706

 

 

 

 

27,964

 

 

 

 

37,082

 

 

 

21,397

 

 

 

 

11,484

 

 

 

 

44,365

 

 

 

 

77,246

 

Operating earnings

 

 

1,901

 

 

 

 

(1,328

)

 

 

 

16,220

 

 

 

 

16,793

 

 

 

85,296

 

 

 

 

12,216

 

 

 

 

11,672

 

 

 

 

109,184

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

2,246

 

 

 

 

13,867

 

 

 

 

21,087

 

 

 

 

37,200

 

 

 

19,075

 

 

 

 

6,447

 

 

 

 

47,907

 

 

 

 

73,429

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 29,

 

 

December 30,

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

January 2, 2016

 

 

January 3, 2015

 

 

December 28, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Total Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food Distribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,074,125

 

 

$

 

1,085,621

 

Military

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

416,220

 

 

$

 

435,647

 

 

$

 

451,518

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

405,587

 

 

 

 

432,818

 

Food Distribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

754,329

 

 

 

763,914

 

 

 

 

805,468

 

Retail

 

 

 

 

 

 

750,412

 

 

 

727,979

 

 

 

 

721,898

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

489,049

 

 

 

 

533,912

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,487

 

 

 

 

4,742

 

 

 

 

4,767

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,151

 

 

 

 

3,446

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,925,448

 

 

$

 

1,932,282

 

 

$

 

1,983,651

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,971,912

 

 

$

 

2,055,797

 

-72-

The Company offers a wide variety of grocery products, general merchandise and health and beauty care, pharmacy, fuel, and other items and services. The following table presents sales by type of similar product and services:

 

January 2, 2016

 

January 3, 2015

 

December 28, 2013

(In thousands, except percentages)

(52 Weeks)

 

(53 Weeks)

 

(39 Weeks)

Non-perishables (1)

$

 

4,845,763

 

 

 

63.3

 

%

 

$

 

4,998,895

 

 

 

63.1

 

%

 

$

 

1,393,157

 

 

 

53.6

 

%

Perishables (2)

 

 

2,373,829

 

 

 

31.0

 

 

 

 

 

2,449,562

 

 

 

31.0

 

 

 

 

 

894,783

 

 

 

34.5

 

 

Pharmacy

 

 

310,377

 

 

 

4.1

 

 

 

 

 

289,494

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

 

 

163,659

 

 

 

6.3

 

 

Fuel

 

 

122,004

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

 

178,111

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

 

 

145,631

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

Consolidated net sales

$

 

7,651,973

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

$

 

7,916,062

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

 

$

 

2,597,230

 

 

 

100.0

 

%

(1)

Consists primarily of general merchandise, grocery, beverages, snacks, tobacco products and frozen foods.

(2)

Consists primarily of produce, dairy, meat, bakery, deli, floral and seafood.


 

 

-75-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 17-18 – Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

Earnings per share amounts for each quarter are required to be computed independently and may not equalsum to the amount computed for the total year.

 

2018

 

 

Full Year

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

1st Quarter

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

52 Weeks

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(16 Weeks)

 

Net sales

$

 

8,064,552

 

 

$

 

1,896,796

 

 

$

 

1,886,730

 

 

$

 

1,895,953

 

 

$

 

2,385,073

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,110,406

 

 

 

 

245,390

 

 

 

 

256,142

 

 

 

 

265,660

 

 

 

 

343,214

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

4,937

 

 

 

 

1,406

 

 

 

 

521

 

 

 

 

804

 

 

 

 

2,206

 

Restructuring charges (gains), asset impairment and other charges

 

 

37,546

 

 

 

 

32,277

 

 

 

 

232

 

 

 

 

(1,164

)

 

 

 

6,202

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

 

40,698

 

 

 

 

(19,501

)

 

 

 

19,919

 

 

 

 

23,085

 

 

 

 

17,195

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

33,791

 

 

 

 

(14,027

)

 

 

 

17,545

 

 

 

 

17,838

 

 

 

 

12,435

 

(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

(219

)

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

(80

)

 

 

 

(66

)

 

 

 

(92

)

Net earnings

$

 

33,572

 

 

$

 

(14,008

)

 

$

 

17,465

 

 

$

 

17,772

 

 

$

 

12,343

 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

 

0.94

 

 

$

 

(0.39

)

 

$

 

0.49

 

 

$

 

0.50

 

 

$

 

0.34

 

Diluted

 

 

0.94

 

 

 

 

(0.39

)

 

 

 

0.49

 

 

 

 

0.50

 

 

 

 

0.34

 

Net earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

 

0.93

 

 

$

 

(0.39

)

 

$

 

0.49

 

 

$

 

0.49

 

 

$

 

0.34

 

Diluted

 

 

0.93

 

 

 

 

(0.39

)

 

 

 

0.49

 

 

 

 

0.49

 

 

 

 

0.34

 

Dividends

$

 

25,923

 

 

$

 

6,471

 

 

$

 

6,469

 

 

$

 

6,457

 

 

$

 

6,526

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

Full Year

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

1st Quarter

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(16 Weeks)

 

Net sales

$

 

7,963,799

 

 

$

 

1,885,500

 

 

$

 

1,868,398

 

 

$

 

1,856,199

 

 

$

 

2,353,702

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,144,909

 

 

 

 

254,815

 

 

 

 

261,692

 

 

 

 

271,026

 

 

 

 

357,376

 

Merger/acquisition and integration

 

 

8,101

 

 

 

 

1,070

 

 

 

 

2,392

 

 

 

 

622

 

 

 

 

4,017

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

189,027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

189,027

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment

 

 

39,432

 

 

 

 

2,799

 

 

 

 

35,626

 

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

 

1,021

 

(Loss) earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

 

(131,644

)

 

 

 

12,492

 

 

 

 

(199,897

)

 

 

 

33,327

 

 

 

 

22,434

 

(Loss) earnings from continuing operations

 

 

(52,617

)

 

 

 

34,710

 

 

 

 

(123,452

)

 

 

 

21,060

 

 

 

 

15,065

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

(228

)

 

 

 

(103

)

 

 

 

(54

)

 

 

 

(31

)

 

 

 

(40

)

Net (loss) earnings

$

 

(52,845

)

 

$

 

34,607

 

 

$

 

(123,506

)

 

$

 

21,029

 

 

$

 

15,025

 

(Loss) earnings from continuing operations per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

 

(1.41

)

 

$

 

0.94

 

 

$

 

(3.31

)

 

$

 

0.56

 

 

$

 

0.40

 

Diluted

 

 

(1.41

)

 

 

 

0.94

 

 

 

 

(3.31

)

 

 

 

0.56

 

 

 

 

0.40

 

Net (loss) earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

 

(1.41

)

 

$

 

0.94

 

 

$

 

(3.32

)

 

$

 

0.56

 

 

$

 

0.40

 

Diluted

 

 

(1.41

)

 

 

 

0.94

 

 

 

 

(3.32

)

 

 

 

0.56

 

 

 

 

0.40

 

Dividends

$

 

24,704

 

 

$

 

6,055

 

 

$

 

6,149

 

 

$

 

6,245

 

 

$

 

6,255

 

-73-

 

Year Ended January 2, 2016

 

 

Full Year

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

1st Quarter

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(52 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(16 Weeks)

 

Net sales

$

 

7,651,973

 

 

$

 

1,768,025

 

 

$

 

1,775,401

 

 

$

 

1,795,864

 

 

$

 

2,312,683

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,115,682

 

 

 

 

258,345

 

 

 

 

259,049

 

 

 

 

262,042

 

 

 

 

336,246

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

8,433

 

 

 

 

1,181

 

 

 

 

4,417

 

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

 

2,684

 

Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment

 

 

8,802

 

 

 

 

1,040

 

 

 

 

760

 

 

 

 

(336

)

 

 

 

7,338

 

Earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

 

100,259

 

 

 

 

26,813

 

 

 

 

24,389

 

 

 

 

31,926

 

 

 

 

17,131

 

Earnings from continuing operations

 

 

63,166

 

 

 

 

17,164

 

 

 

 

15,248

 

 

 

 

20,307

 

 

 

 

10,447

 

(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

(456

)

 

 

 

(435

)

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

 

(46

)

 

 

 

(120

)

Net earnings

$

 

62,710

 

 

$

 

16,729

 

 

$

 

15,393

 

 

$

 

20,261

 

 

$

 

10,327

 

Earnings from continuing operations per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

 

1.68

 

 

$

 

0.46

 

 

$

 

0.41

 

 

$

 

0.54

 

 

$

 

0.28

 

Diluted

 

 

1.67

 

 

 

 

0.46

 

 

 

 

0.40

 

 

 

 

0.54

 

 

 

 

0.28

 

Net earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

 

1.67

 

 

$

 

0.44

 

 

$

 

0.41

 

 

$

 

0.54

 

 

$

 

0.27

 

Diluted

 

 

1.66

 

 

 

 

0.44

 

 

 

 

0.41

 

 

 

 

0.54

 

 

 

 

0.27

 

Dividends

$

 

20,299

 

 

$

 

5,076

 

 

$

 

5,072

 

 

$

 

5,059

 

 

$

 

5,092

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended January 3, 2015

 

 

Full Year

 

 

4th Quarter

 

 

3rd Quarter

 

 

2nd Quarter

 

 

1st Quarter

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(53 Weeks)

 

 

(13 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(12 Weeks)

 

 

(16 Weeks)

 

Net sales

$

 

7,916,062

 

 

$

 

1,962,589

 

 

$

 

1,809,571

 

 

$

 

1,810,175

 

 

$

 

2,333,727

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,156,074

 

 

 

 

282,213

 

 

 

 

261,409

 

 

 

 

265,114

 

 

 

 

347,338

 

Merger integration and acquisition

 

 

12,675

 

 

 

 

4,547

 

 

 

 

1,379

 

 

 

 

2,581

 

 

 

 

4,168

 

Restructuring charges (gains) and asset impairment

 

 

6,166

 

 

 

 

6,233

 

 

 

 

(1,272

)

 

 

 

1,078

 

 

 

 

127

 

Earnings before income taxes and discontinued operations

 

 

90,449

 

 

 

 

15,030

 

 

 

 

28,146

 

 

 

 

27,174

 

 

 

 

20,099

 

Earnings from continuing operations

 

 

59,120

 

 

 

 

12,037

 

 

 

 

17,169

 

 

 

 

17,395

 

 

 

 

12,519

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

(524

)

 

 

 

(166

)

 

 

 

(73

)

 

 

 

(76

)

 

 

 

(209

)

Net earnings

$

 

58,596

 

 

$

 

11,871

 

 

$

 

17,096

 

 

$

 

17,319

 

 

$

 

12,310

 

Earnings from continuing operations per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

 

1.57

 

 

$

 

0.32

 

 

$

 

0.46

 

 

$

 

0.46

 

 

$

 

0.33

 

Diluted

 

 

1.57

 

 

 

 

0.32

 

 

 

 

0.45

 

 

 

 

0.46

 

 

 

 

0.33

 

Net earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

 

1.56

 

 

$

 

0.32

 

 

$

 

0.45

 

 

$

 

0.46

 

 

$

 

0.33

 

Diluted

 

 

1.55

 

 

 

 

0.32

 

 

 

 

0.45

 

 

 

 

0.46

 

 

 

 

0.33

 

Dividends

$

 

18,090

 

 

$

 

4,502

 

 

$

 

4,529

 

 

$

 

4,526

 

 

$

 

4,533

 


 

 

 

Note 19 – Subsequent Events

On December 31, 2018, the Company acquired all of the equity of Martin’s Super Markets (“Martin’s”) for $84.3 million, net of cash acquired. The purchase price is subject to customary working capital adjustments, as necessary. Founded in 1947 and headquartered in South Bend, Indiana, Martin’s currently operates 21 stores in Northern Indiana and Southwest Michigan with approximately 3,500 employees. For their fiscal year ended July 29, 2018, Martin’s had more than $450 million in net sales. Martin’s was an independent retailer and customer of the Company’s Food Distribution segment as of December 29, 2018, and sales from the Food Distribution segment to Martin’s will be eliminated going forward. The acquisition will expand the footprint of the Company’s Retail segment into northern Indiana and southwestern Michigan. The acquisition was funded with proceeds from the Company’s Credit Agreement (Note 7).

-76-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls andand` Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of SpartanNash Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as currently defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was performed as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 (the “Evaluation Date”). This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of SpartanNash Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Chief Accounting Officer (“CAO”). As of the Evaluation Date, SpartanNash Company’s management, including the CEO, CFO and CFO,CAO, concluded that SpartanNash’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of SpartanNash Company, including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief FinancialAccounting Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. SpartanNash Company’s internal controls were designed by, or under the supervision of, the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief FinancialAccounting Officer, and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of its financial reporting and the preparation and presentation of the consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of SpartanNash Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of SpartanNash Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of SpartanNash Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of SpartanNash Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management of SpartanNash Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Through this evaluation, management did not identify any material weakness in the Company’s internal control. There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control over financial reporting. Based on the evaluation, management has concluded that SpartanNash Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018.

The independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K Annual Report has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 as stated in their report on the following page.

-77--74-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

SpartanNash Company and Subsidiaries

Grand Rapids, Michigan

 

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of SpartanNash Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 29, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 29, 2018, of the Company and our report dated February 27, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Controls OverControl over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended January 2, 2016 of the Company and our report dated March 2, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan

March 2, 2016February 27, 2019

-78--75-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

During the last fiscal quarter, there was no change in SpartanNash’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, SpartanNash’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.Other Information

Effective March 2, 2016, the Company entered into Indemnification Agreements with its directors and executive officers. The Indemnification Agreements clarify and supplement indemnification provisions already contained in the Michigan Business Corporation Act and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. The Indemnification Agreements generally provide that the Company shall indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Michigan law, subject to certain exceptions, against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with their service as to the Company. The Indemnification Agreements also provide for rights to advancement of expenses and contribution. The form of Indemnification Agreement is attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 10.21 and is incorporated herein by reference. The foregoing brief description is not intended to be complete and is qualified by reference to the form of Indemnification Agreement.  

The Company did not enter into the Indemnification Agreements in response to, or anticipation of, any claim or proceeding that is pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened.  

-79--76-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

PART III

Item 10.Directors, ExecutiveExecutive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item is here incorporated by reference from the sections titled “The Board of Directors,” “SpartanNash’s Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance Principles,” and “Transactions with Related Persons” in SpartanNash’s definitive proxy statement relating to its annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2016.2019.

Item 11.Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is here incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Executive Compensation,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” “Compensation of Directors,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Compensation Committee Report” in SpartanNash’s definitive proxy statement relating to its annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2016.2019.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is here incorporated by reference from the section titled “Ownership of SpartanNash Stock” in SpartanNash’s definitive proxy statement relating to its annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2016.2019.

The following table provides information about SpartanNash’s equity compensation plans regarding the number of securities to be issued under these plans, the weighted-average exercise prices of options outstanding under these plans and the number of securities available for future issuance as of the end of fiscal 2015.2018.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of securities remaining

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of securities remaining

 

Number of securities to

 

 

 

 

 

 

available for future issuance

 

Number of securities to

 

 

 

 

 

 

available for future issuance

 

be issued upon exercise

 

 

Weighted-average exercise

 

 

under equity compensation

 

be issued upon exercise

 

 

Weighted-average exercise

 

 

under equity compensation

 

of outstanding options,

 

 

price of outstanding options,

 

 

plans (excluding securities

 

of outstanding options,

 

 

price of outstanding options,

 

 

plans (excluding securities

 

warrants and rights

 

 

warrants and rights

 

 

reflected in column (a)

 

warrants and rights

 

 

warrants and rights

 

 

reflected in column (1)

 

Plan Category

(a)

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

(1)

 

 

(2)

 

 

(3)

 

Equity compensation Plans approved by security holders (1)(a)

 

308,793

 

 

 

21.15

 

 

 

2,544,953

 

 

13,052

 

 

 

13.87

 

 

 

1,475,633

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

 

Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not applicable

 

 

 

 

Total

 

308,793

 

 

 

21.15

 

 

 

2,544,953

 

 

13,052

 

 

 

13.87

 

 

 

1,475,633

 

(1)  (a)

Consists of the Spartan Stores, Inc. 2001 Stock Bonus Plan and the Stock Incentive Plan of 2015. The numbers of shares reflected in column (c)(3) in the table above with respect to the Stock Incentive Plan of 2015 (2,497,027 shares) and the 2001 Stock Bonus Plan (47,926 shares) represent shares that may be issued other than upon the exercise of an option, warrant or right. EachThe plan listed above contains customary anti-dilution provisions that are applicable in the event of a stock split or certain other changes in SpartanNash’s capitalization.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is here incorporated by reference from the section titled “Transactions with Related Persons” and the table captioned “Board of Directors Committee Membership” in SpartanNash’s definitive proxy statement relating to its annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2016.2019.

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this item is here incorporated by reference from the section titled “Independent Auditors” in SpartanNash’s definitive proxy statement relating to its annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2016.2019.

-80--77-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

PART IV

 

 

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)

The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

 

1.

Financial Statements.

A. In Item 8.

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated March 2, 2016February 27, 2019

Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 and January 3, 2015December 30, 2017

Consolidated Statements of EarningsOperations for the years ended January 2,December 29, 2018, December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended January 2,December 29, 2018, December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended January 2,December 29, 2018, December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended January 2,December 29, 2018, December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and January 3, 2015 and for the 39-week period ended December 28, 2013

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

2.

Financial Statement Schedules.

Schedules are omitted because the required information is either inapplicable or presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

 

3.

Exhibits.

The information required by this Section (a)(3) of Item 15 is set forth on the exhibit index that follows the Signatures page of this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

-81--78-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, SpartanNash Company (the Registrant) has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SPARTANNASH COMPANY

(Registrant)

Date: March 2, 2016

By

/s/ DENNIS EIDSON

Dennis Eidson

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

-82-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of SpartanNash Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

March 2, 2016

By

*

M. Shân Atkins

Director

March 2, 2016

By

/s/ DENNIS EIDSON

Dennis Eidson

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

March 2, 2016

By

*

Mickey P. Foret

Director

March 2, 2016

By

*

Dr. Frank M. Gambino

Director

March 2, 2016

By

*

Douglas A. Hacker

Director

March 2, 2016

By

*

Yvonne R. Jackson

Director

March 2, 2016

By

*

Elizabeth A. Nickels

Director

March 2, 2016

By

*

Timothy J. O’Donovan

Director

March 2, 2016

By

*

Hawthorne Proctor

Director

March 2, 2016

By

*

Craig C. Sturken

Chairman and Director

March 2, 2016

By

*

William R. Voss

Director

March 2, 2016

By

/s/ DAVID M. STAPLES

David M. Staples

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

March 2, 2016

*By

/s/ DENNIS EIDSON

Dennis Eidson

Attorney-in-Fact

-83-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Document

 

 

    2.1

  

Asset Purchase Agreement and Plandated as of MergerNovember 3, 2016 by and among theSpartanNash Company, Nash-Finch Company,Caito Foods Service, Inc., Blue Ribbon Transport, Inc., and SS Delaware, Inc. dated July 21, 2013.Matthew Caito as Seller’s Representative. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2013.January 9, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

    2.2

Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of January 6, 2017 by and among SpartanNash Company, Caito Foods Service, Inc., Blue Ribbon Transport, Inc., and Matthew Caito as Seller’s Representative. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

    3.1

  

Restated Articles of Incorporation of SpartanNash Company, as amended.amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 18, 2015.15, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

    3.2

  

Bylaws of SpartanNash Company, as amended.amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form 10-Q10-K for the quarteryear ended September 10, 2011. Incorporated herein by reference.

    4.1

Indenture dated December 6, 2012 by and among SpartanNash Company, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, and the Company’s subsidiaries as Guarantors. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2012. Incorporated herein by reference.

    4.2

Form of 6.625% Senior Notes Due31, 2016. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2012. Incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

  10.1

  

Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, among Spartan Stores, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers, and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as administrative agent, and certain lenders from time to time party thereto, dated November 19, 2013.2013. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 19, 2013. Incorporated herein by reference.reference.

 

 

  10.2*10.2

  

SpartanNash Company Executive Cash Incentive Plan of 2010 as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2013. Incorporated herein by reference.  

  10.3* 

Amended and Restated SpartanNash Company Executive Cash Incentive Plan of 2015. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.4*

Form of 2015 Long-Term Executive Incentive Plan Award. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 25, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.5*

Form of 2014 Long-Term Executive Incentive Plan Award. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 19, 2014. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.6*

Form of Amended and Restated 2013 Long-Term Executive Incentive Plan Award. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 19, 2014. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.7*

SpartanNash Company Stock Incentive Plan of 2005, as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2013. Incorporated herein by reference

  10.8*

Determination of Compensation Committee pursuant to the SpartanNash Company Stock Incentive Plan of 2005. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2009. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.9*

SpartanNash Company Stock Incentive Plan of 2015. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-8 filed on June 4, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.10*

SpartanNash Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 27, 2010. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.11*

SpartanNash Company Supplemental Executive Savings Plan. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on December 21, 2001. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.12*

SpartanNash Company Cash Incentive Plan of 2010 as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2013. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.13*

SpartanNash Company 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2013. Incorporated herein by reference.

-84-


SPARTANNASH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Exhibit
Number

Document

  10.14*

SpartanNash Company Stock Bonus Plan. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2013. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.15*

Form of Restricted Stock Award to Executive Officers. Previously filed as an exhibit to SpartanNash Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending April 25, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.16*

Form of Restricted Stock Award to Non-Employee Directors. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending April 25, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.17*

Form of Executive Employment Agreement between SpartanNash Company and certain executive officers, as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.18*

Form of Executive Employment Agreement between SpartanNash Company and certain executive officers. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2013.  Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.19*

Form of Executive Severance Agreement between SpartanNash Company and certain executive officers as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.20*

Form of Executive Severance Agreement between SpartanNash Company and certain executive officers. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 28, 2013.  Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.21*

Form of Indemnification Agreement.

  10.22

Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated January 9, 2015, among SpartanNash Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers, and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as administrative agent, and certain lenders from time to time party thereto.thereto. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 12, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.3

Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 20, 2016, among SpartanNash Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers, and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as administrative agent, and certain lenders from time to time party thereto. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2016. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.4

Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated November 21, 2017, among SpartanNash Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers, and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as administrative agent, and certain lenders from time to time party thereto. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.5

Amendment No. 4 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 18, 2018, among SpartanNash Company and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers, and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as administrative agent, and certain lenders from time to time party thereto. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2018. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.6*

Amended and Restated SpartanNash Company Executive Cash Incentive Plan of 2015. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.7*

Summary of 2018 Long-Term Cash Incentive Award. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 21, 2018. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.8*

Summary of 2018 Annual Cash Incentive Award. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 21, 2018. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.9*

Summary of 2017 Long-Term Cash Incentive Award. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 22, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.10*

Summary of 2017 Annual Cash Incentive Award. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 22, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.11*

Form of 2016 Long-Term Executive Incentive Plan Award. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 23, 2016. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.12*

SpartanNash Company Stock Incentive Plan of 2015. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-8 filed on June 4, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.13*

SpartanNash Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 27, 2010. Incorporated herein by reference.

-79-


Exhibit
Number

Document

  10.14*

SpartanNash Company Supplemental Executive Savings Plan. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement filed on December 21, 2001. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.15*

SpartanNash Company 2001 Stock Bonus Plan. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.16*

Form of Restricted Stock Award to Executive Officers. Previously filed as an exhibit to SpartanNash Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending April 21, 2018. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.17*

Form of Restricted Stock Award to Non-Employee Directors. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending April 21, 2018. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.18*

Form of Executive Employment Agreement between SpartanNash Company and certain executive officers, as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.19*

Form of Executive Employment Agreement between SpartanNash Company and certain executive officers. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.20*

Form of Executive Severance Agreement between SpartanNash Company and certain executive officers, as amended. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.21*

Form of Executive Severance Agreement between SpartanNash Company and certain executive officers. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2017. Incorporated herein by reference.

  10.22*

Form of Indemnification Agreement. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2016. Incorporated herein by reference.

 

  

  21

 

Subsidiaries of SpartanNash Company.Company.

 

  

  23

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.Firm.

 

  

  24

 

Powers of Attorney.Attorney.

 

  

  31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002.

 

  

  31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002.

  31.3  

Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

  32.1

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. This exhibit is furnished, not filed, in accordance with SEC Release Number 33-8212.33-8212.

 

  

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

  

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

  

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

 

  

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

  

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

 

  

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

*

These documents are management contracts or compensation plans or arrangements required to be filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K.


-85--80-


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, SpartanNash Company (the Registrant) has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SPARTANNASH COMPANY

(Registrant)

Date: February 27, 2019

By

/s/ David M. Staples

David M. Staples

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

-81-


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of SpartanNash Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

February 27, 2019

By

*

M. Shân Atkins

Director

February 27, 2019

By

*

Dennis Eidson

Chairman and Director

February 27, 2019

By

*

Dr. Frank M. Gambino

Director

February 27, 2019

By

*

Douglas A. Hacker

Director

February 27, 2019

By

*

Yvonne R. Jackson

Director

February 27, 2019

By

*

Matthew Mannelly

Director

February 27, 2019

By

*

Elizabeth A. Nickels

Director

February 27, 2019

By

*

Hawthorne Proctor

Director

February 27, 2019

By

/s/ David M. Staples

David M. Staples

Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

February 27, 2019

By

*

William R. Voss

Director

February 27, 2019

By

/s/ Mark E. Shamber

Mark E. Shamber

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

February 27, 2019

By

/s/ Tammy R. Hurley

Tammy R. Hurley

Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 27, 2019

*By

/s/ David M. Staples

David M. Staples

Attorney-in-Fact

-82-