Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31 2016, 2023

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number 1-9961

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California

95-3775816

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

19001 S. Western Avenue6565 Headquarters Drive

Torrance, CaliforniaPlano, Texas

9050175024

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 468-1310(469) 486-9300

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Medium-Term Notes, Series B CPI Linked Notes

Stated Maturity Date June 18, 2018January 11, 2028

TM/28

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

(Title (Title of class)None

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesx No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes oNox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesx No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

¨

  Accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

o

Non-accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

¨

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of April 30, 2016,2023, the number of outstanding shares of capital stock, no par value per share, of the registrant was 91,500, all of which shares were held by Toyota Financial Services AmericasInternational Corporation.

Documents incorporated by reference: None

Reduced Disclosure Format

The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format.


Table of Contents


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 20162023

INDEX

PART I

3

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

1514

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

2426

Item 2.

Properties

2426

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

2426

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

2426

PART II

2526

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

2526

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data[Reserved]

26

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2827

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

6258

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

6762

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 238)

6762

Consolidated StatementStatements of Income

6864

Consolidated StatementStatements of Comprehensive Income

6864

Consolidated Balance SheetSheets

6965

Consolidated StatementStatements of Shareholder’s Equity

7066

Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows

7167

Item 9.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

68

Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

68

Note 2. Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments in Marketable Securities

71

Note 3. Finance Receivables, Net

75

Note 4. Allowance for Credit Losses

81

Note 5. Investments in Operating Leases, Net

84

Note 6. Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense

86

Note 7. Debt and Credit Facilities

88

Note 8. Variable Interest Entities

90

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies

92

Note 10. Pension and Other Benefit Plans

95

Note 11. Income Taxes

96

Note 12. Related Party Transactions

99

Note 13. Fair Value Measurements

104

Note 14. Segment Information

110

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

133114

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

133114

Item 9B.

Other Information

133114

PART IIIItem 9C.

134Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

114

PART III

115

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

134115

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

137118

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

137118

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

137118

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

137118

PART IV

138119

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statements andStatement Schedules

138119

Item 16.

SignaturesForm 10-K Summary

139123

Exhibit IndexSignatures

140124

2


Table of Contents


PARTPART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

GENERAL

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (“TMCC”) was incorporated in California in 1982 and commenced operations in 1983. References herein to “TMCC” denote Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, and references herein tothe “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us” denote Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. We are wholly-owned by Toyota Financial Services AmericasInternational Corporation (“TFSA”TFSIC”), a California corporation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Toyota Financial Services Corporation (“TFSC”), a Japanese corporation. TFSC, in turn, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Toyota Motor Corporation (“TMC”), a Japanese corporation. TFSC manages TMC’s worldwide financial services operations. TMCC is marketed under the brands of Toyota Financial Services, and Lexus Financial Services, and Mazda Financial Services.

We provide a variety of finance and insurancevoluntary vehicle and payment protection products and services to authorized Toyota (including Scion) and Lexus dealers or dealer groups, private label dealers or dealer groups, and to a lesser extent, other domestic and import franchise dealers (collectively referred to as “dealers”) and their customers in the United States of America (excluding Hawaii) (the “U.S.”) and Puerto Rico. Our products and services fall primarily into the following categories:

·

Finance - We acquire retail installment sales contracts from dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico (“retail contracts”) and leasing contracts accounted for as either operating leases (“lease contracts”) or direct finance leases from dealers in the U.S.  We collectively refer to our retail and lease contracts as the “consumer portfolio”.  We also provide dealer financing, including wholesale financing, working capital loans, revolving lines of credit and real estate financing to dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.  We collectively refer to our dealer financing portfolio as the “dealer portfolio”.

Finance Operations - We acquire retail installment sales contracts from dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico (“retail contracts”) and leasing contracts accounted for as operating leases (“lease contracts”) from dealers in the U.S. We collectively refer to our retail and lease contracts as the “consumer portfolio.” We also provide dealer financing, including wholesale financing, working capital loans, revolving lines of credit and real estate financing to dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. We collectively refer to our dealer financing portfolio as the “dealer portfolio.”

·

Insurance - Through Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, and its insurance company subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “TMIS”), we provide marketing, underwriting, and claims administration for products that cover certain risks of dealers and their customers in the U.S.  We also provide coverage and related administrative services to certain of our affiliates in the U.S.

Voluntary Protection Operations - Through Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, and its insurance company subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “TMIS”), we provide marketing, underwriting, and claims administration for voluntary vehicle and payment protection products sold by dealers in the U.S. Our voluntary vehicle and payment protection products include vehicle service, guaranteed auto protection, prepaid maintenance, excess wear and use, tire and wheel protection, key replacement protection and used vehicle limited warranty contracts (“voluntary protection products”). TMIS also provides coverage and related administrative services to certain of our affiliates in the U.S.

We support growth in earning assets through funding obtained primarily in the global capital markets as well as funds provided by investing and operating activities. Refer to Item 7. “Management’sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, - Liquidity“Liquidity and Capital Resources”for a discussion of our funding activities.

We primarilyIn fiscal 2021, we announced the restructuring of our customer service operations to better serve our customers by relocating and streamlining the customer service operation and investing in new technology. The restructuring is substantially complete, and our field operations now include three regional experience centers (each, an "Experience Center" and together the "Experience Centers") located in Chandler, Arizona (serving the West region), Plano, Texas (serving the Central region) and Alpharetta, Georgia (serving the East region). Each respective Experience Center maintains dealer service functions and customer service functions.

The dealer service functions in the regional Experience Centers acquire retail contracts,and lease contracts, and insurance contracts from dealers, through 29and market our voluntary protection products to dealers. The dealer saleslending function is centralized at the Central region Experience Center and services offices (“DSSOs”) and service the contracts through three regional customer service centers (“CSCs”) located throughout the U.S.  The DSSOs primarily supportsupports the dealers by providing services such as acquiring retailwholesale financing and lease contracts, financing inventories, and financing other dealer financing activities and requirements such as business acquisitions, facilities refurbishment, real estate purchases, and working capital requirements.

The DSSOs also provide support for our insurance products soldcustomer service functions in the U.S. The CSCsregional experience centers support customer account servicing functions such as collections, lease terminations, and administration of both retail and lease contract customer accounts. The Central region CSCRegion Experience Center also supports insurancevoluntary protection operations by providing agreementcontract and claims administrative services.

On October 1, 2015,In fiscal 2022, TMCC announced, in furtherance of its private label financial services initiative for third party automotive and mobility companies, that we sold certainentered into a nonbinding letter of intent with Great American Outdoors Group LLC, the parent company of Bass Pro Shops, Cabela’s and the White River Marine Group (“Bass Pro Shops”) to provide private label financial services for Bass Pro Shop’s boats, all-terrain vehicle products, and other mobility products. The Company began to provide inventory financing for Bass Pro Shops, its affiliates, and authorized independent dealers in fiscal 2023, with additional private label services, including consumer financing and voluntary protection products and services to be added over time. We are leveraging our existing processes and personnel to originate and service the new assets, and liabilities relatedwe expect to our industrial equipment retail, lease and dealer portfolios.  Refermake certain technology investments to Note 1 – Summarysupport the Bass Pro Shops program.

3


Table of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.  In addition, TMC has announced that vehicles currently manufactured under the Scion brand will transition to the Toyota brand in August 2016.
Contents


Public FilingsAvailable Information

Our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our filings may also be found by accessing the SEC website (http:(https://www.sec.gov)www.sec.gov).  The SEC website contains reports, registration statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. A link to the SEC website and certain of our SEC filings is containedare available free of charge on our website located at: www.toyotafinancial.com under “Investor Relations, SEC Filings”.  We will make available, without charge, electronic or paper copies of our filings upon written request to:

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation

19001 South Western Avenue

Torrance, CA 90501

Attention: Corporate Communications

Investors and others should note that we announce material financial information using the investor relations section of our corporate website (http://www.toyotafinancial.com).website. We use our website, press releases, as well as social media to communicate with our investors, customers and the general public about our company, our services and other issues. While not all of the information that we post on our website or on social media is of a material nature, some information could be material. Therefore, we encourage investors, the media, and others interested in our company to review the information we post on the investor relations section of our website and the Toyota Motor Credit Corporationour Twitter feed (http://www.twitter.com/toyotafinancial).  Any changes to the social media channels we use for this purpose will be posted on the investor relations section of our corporate website.feed. We are not incorporating any of the information set forth on our website or on social media channels into this filing on Form 10-K.

Seasonality

Revenues generated by our retail and lease contracts are generally not subject to seasonal variations. Financing volume is subject to a certain degree of seasonality. This seasonality does not have a significant impact on revenues as collections, generally in the form of fixed payments, occur over the course of several years. We are subject to seasonal variations in credit losses, which are historically higher in the first and fourth calendar quarters of the year.

Geographic Distribution

4


Table of OperationsContents

As of March 31, 2016, approximately 22 percent of retail and lease contracts were concentrated in California, 11 percent in Texas, 8 percent in New York and 5 percent in New Jersey.  As of March 31, 2016, approximately 26 percent of insurance policies and contracts were concentrated in California, 7 percent in New York and 5 percent in New Jersey.  Any material adverse changes to the economies or applicable laws in these states could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.



FINANCE OPERATIONS

We acquire retail and lease contracts from, and provide financing and certain other financial products and services to authorized Toyota and Lexus dealers and, to a lesser extent, other domestic and import franchise dealers and their customers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.  The table below summarizes our financing revenues, net of depreciation by primary product.

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Percentage of financing revenues, net of depreciation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases, net of depreciation

 

 

35

%

 

 

36

%

 

 

31

%

Retail1

 

 

53

%

 

 

52

%

 

 

56

%

Dealer

 

 

12

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

13

%

Financing revenues, net of depreciation

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

1

Includes direct finance lease revenues.

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

2023

 

2022

 

2021

Percentage of financing revenues, net of depreciation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases, net of depreciation

 

31%

 

41%

 

43%

Retail

 

61%

 

54%

 

50%

Dealer

 

8%

 

5%

 

7%

Financing revenues, net of depreciation

 

100%

 

100%

 

100%

Retail and Lease Financing

Pricing

We utilize a tiered pricing program for retail and lease contracts.  The programTMCC matches contract interest rates with customer risk as defined by credit bureau scores and other factors for a range of price and risk combinations. Each application is assigned a credit tier.  Rates vary based on customer credit tier,experience, contract term, loan-to-value and collateral, including whether a new or used vehicle is financed. In addition, special rates may apply as a result of promotional activities. We review and adjust interest rates based on competitive and economic factors and distribute the rates by tier, to our dealers.

Underwriting

We acquire new and used retail and lease contracts primarily from Toyota and Lexus dealers.  Dealers transmit customer credit applications electronically through our online system for contract acquisition. The customer may submit a credit application directly to our website, in which case, the credit application is sent to the dealer of the customer’s choice or to a dealer thatand is near the customer’s residence.  In addition, through our website, customers are able to request a pre-qualification letterconsidered by us for presentation to the dealer specifying the maximum amount that may be financed.preapproval. Upon receipt of the credit application, our loan origination system automatically requests a credit bureau report from one of the major credit bureaus. We use a proprietary credit scoring system to evaluate an applicant’s risk profile. Factors used by the credit scoring system (based on the applicant’s credit history) include the terms of the contract term, ability to pay, debt ratios, amount financed relative to the value of the vehicle to be financed, and credit bureau attributes such as number of trade lines, utilization ratio and number of credit inquiries.

Credit applications are subject to systematic evaluation. Our loan origination system evaluates each credit application to determine if it qualifies for automatic approval or decline without manual intervention (“auto-decisioning”) which approves only the applicant’s credit eligibility.  The origination system distinguishes this type of applicant byusing specific requirements, including internal credit score and then approves theother application without manual intervention.  The origination system is programmed to review application information for purchase policy and legal compliance.characteristics. Typically, the highest quality credit applications are approved automatically.  automatically, and the lowest quality credit applications are automatically declined.

Credit analysts (located at the DSSOs)(working out of our Experience Centers) approve or rejectdecline all credit applications that are not auto-decisioned.auto-decisioned and may also approve an application that has been the subject of an automated decline. Failure to be automatically approved through auto-decisioning does not mean that an application does not meet our underwriting guidelines. A credit analyst decisions applications based on an evaluation that considers an applicant’s creditworthiness and projected ability to meet the monthly payment obligation, which is derived from, among other things, from the amount financed and the contract term. A credit analyst will verify information contained in the credit application if the application presents an elevated level of credit risk. Our proprietary scoring system assists the credit analyst in the credit review process. The credit analyst’s final credit decision is made based upon the degree of credit risk perceived by the credit analyst after assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the application.

Completion of the financing process is dependent upon whether the transaction is a retail or lease contract. For a retail contract, we acquire the retail contract from the dealer and obtain a security interest in the vehicle. We perfect our security interests in the financed retail vehicles through the applicable state department of motor vehicles (or equivalent) with certificate of title filings or with Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) filings, as appropriate. For a lease contract, except as described below under “Servicing”, we acquire the lease contract and concurrently assume ownership of the leased vehicle. We view our lease arrangements, including our operating leases,have the right to pursue collection actions against a delinquent customer, as financing transactionswell as we do not re-lease therepossess a vehicle upon default or lease termination.if a customer fails to meet contractual obligations.



We regularly review and analyze our consumer portfolio to evaluate the effectiveness of our underwriting guidelines and purchasing criteria. If external economic factors, credit losses, or delinquency experience, market conditions or other factors change, we may adjust our underwriting guidelines and purchasing criteria in order to change the asset quality of our portfolio.portfolio or to achieve other goals and objectives.

Subvention5


Table of Contents

In partnership with Subvention and Incentive Programs

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“TMS”), a subsidiary of Toyota Motor North America, Inc. (“TMNA”), is the primary distributor of Toyota and other third partyLexus vehicles in the United States. In partnership with TMNA and certain non-affiliated third-party distributors, we may offer special promotional rates, which we refer to as subvention programs. TMS is the primary distributor of Toyota, LexusTMNA and Scion vehicles in the United States.  TMS paysthird-party distributors pay us the majority of the difference between our standard rate and the promotional rate. Amounts received in connection with these programs allow us to maintain yields at levels consistent with standard program levels. The level of subvention program activity varies based on the marketing strategies of TMS,TMNA and third-party distributors, economic conditions, vehicle inventory levels, and volume of vehicle sales. The amount of subvention received varies based on the mix of Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles included in the promotional rate programs and the timing of the programs. The majority of our lease contracts and a significant portion of our retail contracts are subvened. We may also offer cash and contractual residual value support incentive programs in partnership with TMNA or third-party distributors. Subvention and other cash incentive program payments offered in partnership with TMNA or third-party distributors are receivedsettled at the beginning of the retail or lease contract. We may also offer our own cash incentives and other competitive rate programs. We defer the payments and recognize them over the life of the contract as a yield adjustment for retail contracts and as rental income or a reduction to depreciation expense for lease contracts.  A large portion of our retail and lease contracts is subvened.

Servicing

Our CSCsExperience Centers are responsible for servicing the retail and lease contracts.consumer portfolio. A centralized department manages third-party vendor relationships responsible for the bankruptcy administration, liquidation and post charge-off recovery activities, certain administrative activities, customer services activities and liquidation activities.  pre-charge-off collections with support from the Experience Centers.

We use an online collection and auto dialer system that prioritizes collection efforts and signals our collections personnel to make telephone contact with delinquent customers. We also use a behavioral-based collection strategy to minimize risk of loss and employ various collection methods.  When contracts are acquired, we perfect our security interests in the financed retail vehicles through state department of motor vehicles (or equivalent) certificate of title filings or through Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) filings, as appropriate.  We have the right to repossess a vehicle if a customer fails to meet contractual obligations and the right to pursue collection actions against a delinquent customer.

We use an online collection and auto dialer system that prioritizes collection efforts, generates past due notices, and signals our collections personnel to make telephone contact with delinquent customers.  Collection efforts aremethods based on behavioral scoring models (which analyze borrowers’ past payment performance, vehicle valuation and credit bureau scores to predict future payment behavior). We generally determine whether to commence repossession efforts after an account is 60approximately 80 days past due. Repossessed vehicles are held in inventoryfor sale to comply with statutory requirements and then sold at private auctions unless public auctions are required by applicablestate law. Any unpaid amounts remaining after salethe repossessed vehicle is sold or after taking the full balance charge-off are pursued by us to the extent practical and legally permissible. Any surplus amounts remaining after salerecovery fees, disposition costs, and other expenses have been paid, and after any reserve charge-backs, and/or dealer guarantees and optional product refunds have been credited to the customer’s account, are refunded to the customers. Collections of post-sale deficiencies and refundsfull-balance charge-offs are managed by third-party vendors and the Experience Centers. We charge-off uncollectible portions of surpluses are administered at a centralized facility.  We charge off the amount we do not expect to collectaccounts when payments due are no longer expectedan account is deemed to be receiveduncollectible or when the account isbalance becomes 120 days contractually delinquent, whichever occurs first. However, the Experience Centers will continue to collect or pursue recovery of the vehicle up to 190 days after the account is past due.

We may, in accordance with our customary servicing procedures, offer rebates or waive any prepayment charge, late payment charge, or any other fees that may be collected in the ordinary course of servicing the retail and lease contracts.consumer portfolio. In addition, we may defer a customer’s obligation to make a payment by extending the contract term. Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors, “Industry and Business Risk”-“We face various risks related to health epidemics and other outbreaks, which have had and may continue to have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows”.

Substantially all of our retail and lease contracts are purchased as non-recourse tofrom the dealers, whichdealers. This relieves the dealers of financial responsibility in the event of a customer default.

We may experience a higher risk of loss if customers fail to maintain the required insurance coverage. The terms of our retail contracts require customers to maintain physical damage insurance covering loss or damage to the financed vehicle in an amount not less than the full value of the vehicle.vehicle and to provide evidence of such insurance upon our request. The terms of each contract allow but do not require us to obtain any such insurance coverage on behalf of the customer. In accordance with our customary servicing procedures, we do not exercise our right to obtain insurance coverage on behalf of the customer. Our lease contracts require lessees to maintain minimum liability insurance and

physical damage insurance covering loss or damage to the leased vehicle in an amount not less than the full value of the vehicle. We currently do not monitor ongoing maintenance ofcustomer insurance coverage as part of our customary servicing procedures for retail or lease accounts.the consumer portfolio.

6


Table of Contents

Toyota Lease Trust, a Delaware business trust (the “Titling Trust”), acts as lessor and holds title to certain leased vehicles in specified states.the U.S. This arrangement was established to facilitate lease securitizations. We serviceTMCC services lease contracts acquired by the Titling Trust from Toyota, Lexus, and Lexus dealers in the same manner as lease contracts owned directly by us.  We hold an undivided trustprivate label dealers. TMCC holds a beneficial interest in certain lease contracts owned by the Titling Trust, and these lease contracts are included in Investments in operating leases, net on our lease assets.


Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 5 – Investments in Operating Leases, NetRemarketing

At the end and Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities of the lease term, theNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Remarketing

The lessee may purchase the leased assetvehicle at the contractual residual value or return the leased assetvehicle to the dealer. If the leased assetvehicle is returned to the dealer, the dealer may purchase the leased assetvehicle or return it to us. We are responsible for disposing of the leased assetvehicle if the lessee or dealer does not purchase the assetvehicle at lease maturity.

In order to minimize losses at lease maturity,when vehicles are returned to us, we have developed remarketing strategies to maximize proceeds and minimize disposition costs on used vehicles sold at lease termination.vehicles. We use various channels to sell vehicles returned at lease-end andor repossessed vehicles,prior to lease-end, including a dealer direct programand auction sale platforms (“Dealer Direct”) and physical auctions.

The goal of Dealer Direct is to increase dealer purchases of off-lease vehicles thereby reducing the disposition costs of such vehicles. Through Dealer Direct, the dealer accepting return of the leasedlease vehicle (the “grounding dealer”) has the option to purchase the vehicle at the contractual residual value, purchase the vehicle at an assessed market value, or return the vehicle to us. Vehicles not purchased by the grounding dealer are made available to all Toyota and Lexus dealers through the Dealer Direct online auction. Vehicles not purchased through Dealer Direct are sold at physical vehicle auction sites throughout the country. Where deemed necessary, we recondition used vehicles prior to sale at auction in order to enhance the vehicle values at auction.  Additionally, we redistribute vehicles geographically to minimize oversupply in any location.values.



Dealer Financing

Dealer financing is comprised of wholesale financing and other financing options designed to meet dealer business needs.

Wholesale Financing

We provide wholesale financing to dealers for inventories of new and used Toyota, Lexus, Scionprivate label, and other domestic and import vehicles. We acquire a security interest in the vehicle inventory, and/or other dealership assets, as appropriate, which we perfect through UCC filings. Wholesale financing may also be backed by corporate or individual guarantees from, or on behalf of, affiliated dealers, dealer groups, or dealer principals. In the event of a dealer default under a wholesale loan arrangement,agreement, we have the right to liquidate assets in which we have a perfected security interest and to seek legal remedies pursuant to the wholesale loan agreement and any applicable guarantees.

TMCCAdditionally, TMNA and TMS are parties to an agreement pursuant to which TMS will arrange for the repurchase of new Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles at the aggregate cost financedother manufacturers may be obligated by TMCC in the event of a dealer defaultapplicable law, or under wholesale financing.  TMCC is also party to similar agreements with other domesticus, to repurchase or to reassign new vehicle inventory we financed that meets certain mileage and import manufacturers.  In addition, wemodel year parameters, curtailing our risk. We also provide other types of wholesale financing to certain Toyota and Lexus dealers and other third parties, at the request of TMSTMNA or private Toyota distributors, and TMSTMNA or the applicable private distributor guarantees the payments by such borrowers.

Other Dealer Financing

We provide fixed and variable rate working capital loans, revolving lines of credit, and real estate financing to dealers and various multi-franchise organizations referred to as dealer groups for facilities construction and refurbishment, working capital requirements, real estate purchases, business acquisitions and other general business purposes. These loans are typically secured with liens on real estate, vehicle inventory, and/or other dealership assets, as appropriate, and may be guaranteed by individual or corporate guarantees of affiliated dealers, dealer groups, or dealer principals. Although the loans are typically collateralized or guaranteed, the value of the underlying collateral or guarantees may not be sufficient to cover our exposure under such agreements. Our pricing reflects market conditions, the competitive environment, the level of support dealers provide for our retail, lease and insurance businessvoluntary protection products and the credit worthinesscreditworthiness of each dealer.


7


Table of Contents

Before establishing a wholesale loan or other dealer financing agreement, we perform a credit analysis of the dealer. During this analysis, we:

·

Review credit reports and financial statements and may obtain bank references;

Review financial statements and we may obtain credit reports;

·

Evaluate the dealer’s financial condition; and

Evaluate the dealer’s financial condition and history of servicing debt; and

·

Assess the dealer’s operations and management.

Assess the dealer’s operations and management.

On the basis of this analysis, we may approve the issuance of a loan or financing agreement and determine the appropriate amount to lend.

As part of our monitoring processes, we require all dealers to submit monthlyperiodic financial statements. We also perform periodic physical audits of vehicle inventory as well as monitor the timeliness of dealer inventory financing payoffs in accordance with the agreed-upon terms to identify possible risks.


Competition


INSURANCE OPERATIONS

TMCC markets its insurance productsWe operate in a highly competitive environment and compete with other financial institutions including national and regional commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, online banks, finance companies, and alternative financing sources. To a lesser extent, we compete with other automobile manufacturers’ affiliated finance companies that actively seek to purchase retail contracts through TMIS. The principal activities of TMIS include marketing, underwriting,Toyota, Lexus, and claims administrationprivate label dealers. We also compete with national and regional commercial banks and other automobile manufacturers’ affiliated finance companies for products that cover certain risksdealer financing. No single competitor is dominant in the industry. We compete primarily through service quality, our relationship with TMNA and third-party automotive and mobility companies to whom we provide financial services, and financing rates. We seek to provide exceptional customer service and competitive financing programs to our dealers and to their customers. Our affiliation with TMNA and relationships with third-party automotive and mobility companies to whom we provide financial services offers an advantage in providing financing or leasing of Toyota, Lexus, Scion and other domestic and import franchise dealers and their customers in the U.S.  TMIS also provides other coverage and related administrative services to certainprivate label vehicles.


8


Table of our affiliates in the U.S.Contents

Gross revenues from insurance operations on a consolidated basis comprised 7 percent of total gross revenues for fiscal 2016, 8 percent for fiscal 2015 and 8 percent for fiscal 2014.VOLUNTARY PROTECTION OPERATIONS

Products and Services

TMIS offers variousvoluntary protection products and services on Toyota, Lexus, Scion and other domestic and import vehicles suchthat are primarily sold by dealers as vehicle service agreements, guaranteed autopart of the dealer’s sale of a vehicle. The majority of the voluntary protection agreements, prepaid maintenanceproducts offered by TMIS are not regulated as insurance products. However, certain states require the Company’s contracts excess wear and use agreements, and tire and wheel protection agreements.be backed by policies issued by a regulated insurance company. To satisfy the aforementioned requirement, TMIS utilizes its insurance company subsidiaries to underwrite certain risks. Vehicle service agreementscontracts offer vehicle owners and lessees mechanical breakdown protection for new and used vehicles secondary to the manufacturer’s new vehicle warranty. Guaranteed auto protection insurance and debt cancellation agreementscontracts provide coverage for a lease or retail contract deficiency balance in the event of a total loss or theft of the covered vehicle. Prepaid maintenance contracts provide maintenance services at manufacturer recommended intervals. Excess wear and use agreementscontracts are available on leases of Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles and protect against excess wear and use charges that may be assessed at lease termination. Tire and wheel protection agreementscontracts provide coverage in the event that a covered vehicle’s tires or wheels become damaged as a result of a road hazard or structural failure due to a defect in material or workmanship, to the extent not covered by the manufacturer or the tire distributor warranties.

Prior Certain tire and wheel protection contracts also cover expenses related either to March 1, 2014, Toyota, Lexus, and other domestic and importreplacing or reprogramming a vehicle dealers who elected to participatekey or vehicle key remote in the inventory insurance program obtainedevent of loss or damage. Key replacement protection contracts provide stand-alone coverage for inventory financed by TMCC through TMIS.  Beginning March 1, 2014, Toyota, Lexus, and other domestic and import dealers who electexpenses related either to participatereplacing or reprogramming a vehicle key or vehicle key remote in the inventoryevent of loss or damage. Used vehicle limited warranty contracts are included with the purchase of a used vehicle and provide for the repair or replacement of certain covered components that have mechanically failed on the covered used vehicle.

TMIS provides TMNA contractual indemnity insurance program obtain coverage for eligible vehicle inventory through a third party who cedes 100 percent of the business to TMIS.  TMIS continues to purchase third party reinsurance covering the excess of certain dollar maximums per occurrence and in the aggregate, the amount of which remains unchanged.  Through reinsurance, TMIS limits its exposure to losses by obtaining the right to reimbursement from the assuming company for the reinsured portion of losses.

TMIS provides TMS contractual indemnity coveragelimited warranties on certified Toyota Lexus and ScionLexus pre-owned vehicles. TMIS also provides umbrella liability insurance to TMSTMNA and other affiliates covering certain dollar value layers of risk above various primary or self-insured retentions. On all layers in which TMIS provides coverage, 99 percent of the risk is ceded to various reinsurers.  In addition, TMISa reinsurer.

Competition for the voluntary protection products is primarily from national and regional independent service contract providers. We compete primarily through service quality, our relationship with TMNA and third-party automotive and mobility companies to whom we provide financial services and product benefits. Our affiliation with TMNA provides property deductible reimbursement insurance to TMS and affiliates covering losses incurred under their primary policy.an advantage in selling our voluntary protection products.




9


Table of Contents

RELATIONSHIPS WITH AFFILIATES

Our businessTMCC is substantially dependent uponparty to agreements with TMNA and certain TMNA subsidiaries. For ease of reference herein, we refer solely to the saleparent entity, TMNA. As a result, all references to the agreements or activities of Toyota, LexusTMNA herein that are carried out by a TMNA subsidiary are deemed to also make reference to and Scion vehicles and our ability to offer competitive financing and insurance products ininclude the U.S.  TMS is the primary distributor of Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles in the U.S.  Automobiles and light-duty trucks sold by TMS totaled 2.5 million units for fiscal 2016 compared to 2.4 million units for fiscal 2015 and 2.2 million units for fiscal 2014.  Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles accounted for approximately 14 percent of all automobile and light-duty truck unit sales volume in the U.S. during fiscal 2016, compared to 15 percent during fiscal 2015 and 14 percent during fiscal 2014.applicable TMNA subsidiary.

TMSTMNA sponsors subvention, cash and contractual residual value support incentive programs on certain new and used Toyota and Lexus and Scion vehicles that result in reduced scheduled payments for qualified retail and lease customers.vehicles. The level of subventionincentive program activity varies based on TMSTMNA marketing strategies, economic conditions, vehicle inventory levels, and volume of vehicle sales.

TMCCTMNA may be obligated by applicable law, or under agreements with us, to repurchase or to reassign new vehicle inventory we financed that meets certain mileage and TMS are parties to a shared services agreement which covers certain technological and administrative services, such as information systems support, facilities, insurance coverage, and corporate services provided between the companies.  In addition, TMCC and TMS are parties to an agreement pursuant to which TMS will arrange for the repurchase of new Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles at the aggregate cost financed by TMCC in the event of a dealer default under wholesale financing.  In addition, wemodel year parameters. We also provide other types of financing to certain Toyota and Lexus dealers and other third parties at the request of TMSTMNA or private Toyota distributors, and TMSTMNA or the applicable private distributor guarantees the payments by such borrowers.

TMNA provides shared services to TMCC, including certain technological and administrative services, such as information systems support, facilities, insurance coverage, human resources and other corporate services. TMCC also provides shared services to TMNA, including certain treasury and procurement services.

TMCC is a participating employer in certain retirement and post-retirement medical care, life insurance and other benefits sponsored by TMNA, as discussed further in Note 10 – Pension and Other Benefit Plans of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

TMCC is party to agreements with TMNA and other affiliates relating to the team member vehicle benefit program, which allows team members to lease Toyota and Lexus vehicles on terms exclusive to the benefit program. TMNA serves as the chief administrator of the program. TMCC acquires and services team member leases after origination. A portion of the vehicles used for the team member vehicle benefit program are acquired from TMNA. TMCC receives a per vehicle contribution from participating affiliates to assist with the costs of its contribution to the benefit program, and TMCC pays a per vehicle participation fee to TMNA to participate in the benefit program.

TMCC and Toyota Financial Savings Bank (“TFSB”), a Nevada thrift company owned by TFSA,TFSIC, are parties to a master shared services agreement under which TMCC and TFSB provide certain services to each other. TMCC and TFSB are also parties to an expense reimbursement agreement, which provides that TMCC will reimburse certain expenses incurred by TFSB in connection with providing certain financial products and services to TMCC’s customers and dealers in support of TMCC’s customer loyalty strategy and programs.

TMCC receives support from and TFSA are partiesprovides support to an expense reimbursement agreement.  Under the terms of the agreement, TMCC reimbursed certain expenses incurred by TFSA, the parent of TMCCTFSC and TFSB, with respect to costs related to TFSB’s credit card rewards program.  TFSB sold its credit card portfolio in October 2015 and no credit card rewards program costs have been incurred after such date.

Prior to January 1, 2015, our employees were generally eligible to participateother affiliates in the Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Pension Plan sponsored by TMS.  Effective January 1, 2015, TMS-sponsored benefit pension plans were closed to employees first employed or reemployed on or after such date.  Employees meeting certain eligibility requirements may participate in the Toyota Motor Sales Savings Plan sponsored by TMSform of promissory notes and various health, lifeloan and other post-retirement benefits sponsored bycredit facility agreements, including a revolving credit facility with TMS as discussed further in Note 12 – Pension and Other Benefit Plans of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.which may be used for general corporate purposes.

Credit support agreements exist between TMCC and TFSC and between TFSC and TMC. These agreements are further discussed in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

TMIS provides administrative services and various types of coverage to TMSTMNA and other affiliates, including contractual indemnity coverage for TMS’limited warranties on TMNA’s certified pre-owned vehicle program and umbrella liability insurance, and property deductible reimbursement insurance.

See Refer to Note 1512 – Related Party Transactions of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.




COMPETITION

We operate in a highly competitive environment and compete with other financial institutions including national and regional commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, and finance companies.  To a lesser extent, we compete with other automobile manufacturers’ affiliated finance companies that actively seek to purchase retail contracts through Toyota and Lexus dealers. We compete with national and regional commercial banks and other automobile manufacturers’ affiliated finance companies for dealer financing.  No single competitor is dominant in the industry.  We compete primarily through service quality, our relationship with TMS, and financing rates.  We seek to provide exceptional customer service and competitive financing programs to our dealers and to their customers.  Our affiliation with TMS offers an advantage in providing financing or leasing10


Table of Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles.Contents

Competition for the principal products and services provided through our insurance operations is primarily from national and regional independent service contract providers.  We compete primarily through service quality, our relationship with TMS and product benefits.  Our affiliation with TMS provides an advantage in selling our insurance products and services.

REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

Our finance and insurance operationsvoluntary protection products are regulated under both federal and state law.

Federal Consumer Finance Regulation

Our finance operations are governed by, among other federal laws, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth inConsumer Leasing Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, the unfair, deceptive and abusive practices (UDAAP) provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), and the consumer data privacy and security provisions of the Gramm-Leach Bliley Act.

The Equal Credit Opportunity Act is designed to prevent credit discrimination on the basis of certain protected classes, requires the distribution of specified credit decision notices and limits the information that may be requested and considered in a credit transaction. The Truth in Lending Act and the Truth inConsumer Leasing Act place disclosure and substantive transaction restrictions on consumer credit and leasing transactions. The Fair Credit Reporting Act imposes restrictions and requirements regarding our use and sharing of credit reports, the reporting of data to credit reporting agencies credit decision notices,including the accuracy and integrity of information reported, to the credit reporting agenciesdecision notices, consumer dispute handling procedures and identity theft prevention requirements. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act provides additional protections for certain customers in the military. For example, it requires us, in most circumstances, to reduce the interest rate charged to customers who have subsequently joined, enlisted, been inducted or called to active military duty, and also requires us to allow eligible servicemembers to early terminate their lease agreements with us early without penalty. UDAAP laws prohibit practices that are unfair, deceptive or abusive towards consumers.

Federal privacy and data security laws place restrictions on our use and sharing of consumer data, impose privacy notice requirements, give consumers the right to opt out of certain uses and sharing of their data and impose safeguarding rules regarding the maintenance, storage, transmission and destruction of consumer data. Cybersecurity and data privacy are areas of heightened legislative and regulatory focus. The timing and effects of potential legislative or regulatory changes to data privacy regulations is uncertain.

In addition, the dealers who originate our retail and lease contracts also must comply with federal credit and trade practice statutes and regulations. Failure of the dealers to comply with these statutes and regulations could result in remedies that could have an adverse effect on us.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was enacted in 2010, and its implementing regulations have had, and will likely continue to have, broad implications for the consumer financial services industry. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which was created by the Dodd-Frank Act, has broad regulatory,rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement authority over entities offering consumer financial services or products, including non-bank companies, such as TMCC (“Covered Entities”).

In this capacity,The CFPB’s supervisory authority has focused on fair lending compliance, repossessions, debt collection, the CFPB cantreatment of customers during the COVID-19 pandemic, credit reporting, and the marketing and sale of certain optional products, including voluntary protection products we finance or sell through TMIS.

The CFPB’s supervisory authority permits it to examine Covered Entities for compliance with consumer financial protection laws and has authority to order remediation of violations in a number of ways, including imposing civil monetary penalties and requiring Covered Entities to provide customer restitution and to improve their compliance management systems. On August 31, 2015, we became subject to the CFPB’s supervisory authority when the CFPB’s final rule over “larger participants” in the auto finance industry took effect.  Such supervisory authority allows the CFPB to conduct comprehensive and rigorouslaws. These examinations to assess compliance with consumer financial protection laws, which could result in enforcement actions, regulatory fines and mandated changes to our business, products, policies and procedures.

In February 2016, the CFPB published a list of nine policy priorities it intends to focus its resources on over the next two years.  These priorities include, among others, initiation of the rulemaking process regarding debt collection practices that would apply to third-party collectors and first-party collectors, such as ourselves, and continued examination and investigation of, and potential rulemaking regarding, consumer credit reporting practices.  The timing and impact of these anticipated rules on our business remain uncertain.


In addition, the CFPB has increased scrutiny of the sale of certain ancillary or add-on products, including products similar to those we finance or sell through TMIS.  The CFPB has questioned such products’ value and how such products are marketed and sold.

The CFPB also hasCFPB’s enforcement authority under whichpermits it is authorized to conduct investigations (which may include a joint investigation with other agencies and regulators) of, and initiate enforcement actions forrelated to, violations of federal consumer financial protection laws.laws, including discriminatory practices not directly covered by the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The CFPB has the authority to obtain cease and desist orders (which can include orders for restitution or rescission of contracts, as well as other kindstypes of affirmative relief), or other forms of remediation, and/or impose monetary penalties. The CFPB and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) have become more active in investigatingmay investigate the products, services and operations of credit providers, including banks and other finance companies engaged in auto finance activities. BothAs a result of such investigations, both the CFPB and FTC have announced various enforcement actions against lenders in the past few years involving significant penalties, consent orders, cease and desist orders and similar remedies that, if applicable to auto finance providers andus or the products, services and operations we offer, may require us to cease or alter certain business practices, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.  We expect the CFPB’s investigation of, and initiation of enforcement actions against, credit providers, whether on its own initiative or jointly with other agencies and regulators, will continue for the foreseeable future.  

CFPB supervision and enforcement actions, if any, may result in monetary penalties, increase our compliance costs, require changes in our business practices, affect our competitiveness, impair our profitability, harm our reputation or otherwise adversely affect our business.

The CFPB has focused on the area of auto finance, particularly with respect to indirect financing arrangements, dealer compensation and fair lending compliance.  In March 2013, the CFPB issued a bulletin stating that indirect auto lenders may be liable for violations under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act based on dealer-specific and portfolio-wide disparities on a prohibited basis.  According to the bulletin, these disparities result from allowing dealers to mark up the interest rate offered by the indirect auto lenders to the contract rate offered to consumers by the dealers.  In addition, the bulletin outlined steps that indirect auto lenders should take in order to comply with fair lending laws regarding dealer markup and compensation policies.

On February 2, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), we reached a settlement with the CFPB and the U.S. Department of Justice (collectively, the “Agencies”) related to the Agencies’ previously disclosed investigation of, and allegations regarding, our discretionary dealer compensation practices. We entered into a consent order with each of the Agencies to reflect this settlement. Pursuant to the consent orders, we agreed to implement a new dealer compensation policy within 180 days of the Effective Date, which includes, among other things, decreased limits on dealer participation caps of 125 basis points (1.25 percent) for contracts with terms of 60 months or less and 100 basis points (1.00 percent) for contracts with longer terms. In connection with the implementation of such policy, we agreed to maintain general compliance management systems reasonably designed to assure compliance with all relevant federal consumer financial laws.  Additionally, we agreed to pay an amount in consumer restitution that is not material to our financial condition or results of operations, and which is within the amount we had previously recorded as a loss contingency.  Compliance costs and the changes to our business practices required by the consent orders may adversely affect our future results of operations and financial condition, including our financing volume, market share, financing margins, and net earning assets.  liquidity.


11


Table of Contents

State Consumer Finance Regulation

A majority of states (and Puerto Rico) have enacted legislation establishing licensing requirements to conduct financing activities. We must renew these licenses periodically. Most states also impose limits on the maximum rate of finance charges.charges, while other state and federal legislatures are also discussing an all-in rate cap that would include finance charges plus charges on our ancillary products such as voluntary protection products. In certain states, the margin between the present statutory maximum interest rates and borrowing costs is sufficiently narrow that, in periods of rapidly increasing or high interest rates, there could be an adverse effect on our operations in these states if we were unable to pass on increased interest costs to our customers. Some state laws impose rate and other restrictions on credit transactions with customers in active military status in addition to those imposed by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.

State laws also impose requirements and restrictions on us with respect to, among other matters, required credit application and finance and lease disclosures, late fees and other charges, the right to repossess a vehicle for failure to pay or other defaults under the retail or lease contract, other rights and remedies we may exercise in the event of a default under the retail or lease contract, privacy matters, and other consumer protection matters. Many states are also focusing on cybersecurity and data privacy as areas warranting consumer protection. Some states have passed complex legislation dealing with consumer information, which impacts companies such as TMCC. In some jurisdictions, these laws and regulations provide a private right of action that would allow customers to bring suit directly against us for mishandling their data for certain violations of these laws and regulations.



Our insuranceTMIS operations are subject to state insurance regulations and licensing requirements. State laws vary with respect to which products are regulated and what types of corporate licenses and filings are required to offer certain products and services.products. Certain products offered by TMIS are covered by state privacy laws.  Insurancelaws as well as new cybersecurity and data privacy legislation. Our insurance company subsidiaries must be appropriately licensed in certain states in which they conduct business, must maintain minimum capital requirements and file annual financial information as determined by their state of domicile and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Failure to comply with these requirements could have an adverse effect on insurancevoluntary protection operations in a particular state. We actively monitor applicable laws and regulations in each state in order to maintain compliance.

Recently, stateState regulators are taking a more stringent approach to supervising and regulating providers of financial products and services subject to their jurisdiction. In addition, we are subject to governmental and regulatory examinations, information-gathering requests and investigations from time to time. We expect to continue to face greater supervisory scrutiny and enhanced supervisory requirements infor the foreseeable future.  We have received a request for documents and information from the New York State Department of Financial Services relating to our lending practices (including fair lending), and a request for documents and information pursuant to a civil investigative demand from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General relating to our financing of guaranteed auto protection (“GAP”) insurance products on retail contracts.  We are cooperating with these requests, but are unable to predict their outcome given their preliminary status.

Other Federal and International Regulation

The Dodd-Frank Act also established the Financial Stability Oversight Council (the “FSOC”), which may designate non-bank financial companies that pose systemic risk to the U.S. financial system (“SIFIs”) to be supervised by the Federal Reserve.  The Federal Reserve is required to establish and apply enhanced prudential standards to SIFIs, including capital, liquidity, counterparty exposure, resolution plan and overall risk management standards.  The FSOC uses a multi-stage review process to evaluate non-bank financial companies for potential designation and supervision by the Federal Reserve.  If we were designated for supervision after this multi-stage review process and any available appeal processes, we could experience increased compliance costs, the need to change our business practices, impairments to our profitability and competitiveness and other adverse effects on our business.

In addition to the FSOC process, certain parallel regulatory efforts are underway on an international level.  The Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) – an international standard-setting authority – has proposed a methodology for assessing and designating non-bank non-insurer global-SIFIs (“G-SIFIs”).  It is not yet clear when this framework will be finalized, what form a final framework may take, what policy measures will be recommended to apply to G-SIFIs, and whether TMCC or any of its affiliates would be designated and subject to additional regulatory requirements due to any potential G-SIFI designation.

In addition, certain financial companies with $50 billion or more in assets, which could include us, and FSOC-designated SIFIs are potentially subject to assessments under the new Orderly Liquidation Authority (“OLA”), which was created by the Dodd-Frank Act to provide the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) with authority to resolve large, complex financial companies outside of the normal bankruptcy process.  Should a resolution under OLA occur and the proceeds from liquidation are not able to fully cover the costs of resolution, the FDIC is required to impose assessments in accordance with factors specified in the Dodd-Frank Act.  Therefore, the amount of any assessment that might result cannot currently be determined.  Further, we could be placed into resolution under OLA if the U.S. Treasury Secretary (in consultation with the President of the United States) were to determine that we were in default or danger of default and that our resolution under other applicable law (e.g., U.S. bankruptcy law) would have serious adverse effects on the financial stability of the United States.  Resolution under OLA could result in changes in our structure, organization, and funding, and the repudiation of certain of our contracts by the FDIC, as receiver under OLA.

Under the Volcker Rule, which was enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, companies affiliated with U.S. insured depository institutions are generally prohibited from engaging in “proprietary trading” and certain transactions with certain privately offered funds. Companies subject to the Volcker Rule were required to bring all of their activities and investments into conformance by July 21, 2015, subject to certain extensions. The activities prohibited by the Volcker Rule are not core activities for us. Accordingly, we do not believeHowever, the federal financial regulatory agencies charged with implementing the Volcker Rule could further amend the rule or change their approach to administering, enforcing or interpreting the rule, which could negatively affect us and its implementing regulations are likelypotentially require us to have a material effect onlimit or change our businessactivities or operations.

The Dodd-Frank Act also establishedamended the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) to establish a newcomprehensive framework for the regulation of certain over-the-counter (OTC)(“OTC”) derivatives referred to as swaps and security-based swaps. TheUnder the Dodd-Frank Act, requires the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) is required to adopt certain rules and regulations governing swaps and the SEC to adopt certain rules and regulations governing security-based swaps. While theThe CFTC has completed the majorityalmost all of its regulations in this area, most of which are in effect, the SEC has not yet adopted a number of its security-based swap regulations.effect.


The OTC derivatives provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act impose clearing, trading and margin requirements on certain contracts.  At present, we qualify for exceptions from these requirements for the swaps that we enter into to hedge our commercial risks.  However, if we were to fail to qualify for such exceptions, we could become subject to some or all of these requirements, which would increase our cost of entering into and maintaining such hedging positions.  Moreover, the application of the clearing, trading and margin requirements, and other related regulations, to our dealer counterparties may change the cost and availability of the OTC derivatives that we use for hedging.  Certain other requirements, such as reporting and recordkeeping, also apply to such instruments, but are not expected to have a material impact on us.

The full impact of the OTC derivatives provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and related regulatory requirements upon our business will not be known until the regulations are fully implemented and the market for derivatives contracts has adjusted. The Dodd-Frank Act and regulations could significantly increase the cost of OTC derivative contracts, materially alter the terms of OTC derivative contracts, reduce the availability of OTC derivatives to protect against risks we encounter, or reduce our ability to monetize or restructure our existing OTC derivative contracts. If we reduce our use of OTC derivatives as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and resulting regulations, our results of operations may become more volatile and our cash flows may be less predictable, which could adversely affect our ability to plan for and fund capital expenditures.

We continually review our operations for compliance with applicable laws. Future administrative rulings, judicial decisions, legislation, regulations and regulatory guidance, and supervision and enforcement actions may result in monetary penalties, increase our compliance costs, require changes in our business practices, affect our competitiveness, impair our profitability, harm our reputation or otherwise adversely affect our business.

See “PartConcern over climate change or other environmental matters may result in new or increased legal and regulatory requirements and new financial incentives regarding electrified vehicles intended to mitigate factors contributing to, or intended to address the potential impacts of, climate change or other environmental concerns. In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (“the Act”) was signed into law. The Act modifies climate and clean energy corporate tax provisions, including, among other things, amendments to the federal tax credit for plug-in vehicles available under current tax law. Such regulations (including laws related to greenhouse gas emitting products or services) and government incentives may require us to alter our proposed business plans, lead to increased compliance costs and changes to our operations and could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

12


Table of Contents

Refer to Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors , "Regulatory, Legal, and Other Risks"The“The regulatory environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.results of operations.

EMPLOYEE RELATIONS

HUMAN CAPITAL

Employees

At April 30, 2016,March 31, 2023, we had 3,140 full-timeapproximately 3,800 employees. We consider our employee relations to be satisfactory. We are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements with our employees. Depending on business needs, and as appropriate, we have implemented hybrid work models, which permit a mix of onsite and remote work arrangements for certain roles.

Culture

Our human capital objective in managing our business is to attract, retain, and fully engage talented team members who share our core values, including continuous improvement and respect for people. Toyota’s corporate culture is driven by “The Toyota Philosophy”, our roadmap of the company we want to be, which is underpinned by our mission of producing happiness for all and our vision of creating mobility for all. Our team members are actively involved in Toyota’s transformation toward becoming a mobility company. We offer a variety of training opportunities and career development resources to enhance the skills of our team members, encourage innovation, and create an attractive workplace where employees want to stay and grow. Our hybrid work schedules (offered as appropriate) are intended to provide flexibility to our team members, strengthen employee retention, and enable us to attract a broad and inclusive workforce. We encourage teamwork and collaboration and know that valuing diverse backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives is the right thing to do not only for our team members, but also for our business.

Diversity and Inclusion

We believe in equality, respect, and the inclusive treatment of all people, and we promote a workplace where all team members can play an active role. We believe that fostering a company culture that values and promotes diversity and inclusion helps us to achieve higher levels of productivity, enhances our competitiveness and ability to innovate, spurs creativity among our team members, and deepens our ability to understand and serve our customers.


We sponsor Business Partnering Groups, which are employee-driven networks based on common identities, affinities, experiences, and allyship, that allow team members to connect with each other, grow professionally, support our business goals, and help build the inclusive culture that represents the future of our company. We also offer trainings and workshops to educate team members and foster an inclusive and supportive environment.

Our Executive Diversity and Inclusion Committee endeavors to guide, endorse and support our diversity and inclusion strategic efforts. Toyota’s external Diversity Advisory Board works in partnership with our leadership to reinforce diversity and inclusion strategies and offer insight and perspective that helps Toyota cultivate a diversity and inclusion mindset across the enterprise.

Health and Safety

We recognize the health, safety, and well-being of our team members is a top priority. Actively cultivating a culture, environment, and team member experience that embraces, empowers, and respects all people - including their health, wellbeing, and safety - drives innovation and relevancy. We offer a variety of support and benefits to our team members beyond traditional healthcare, including adoption and fertility benefits, parental leave, mental and financial health services, wellness programs, and support to enable people with disabilities to fully utilize their talents.


13


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISKRISK FACTORS

We are exposed to certain risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial conditioncondition. There may be additional risks and operating results.uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial that may also have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

INDUSTRY AND BUSINESS RISK

General business, economic, and geopolitical conditions, as well as other market events, may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our operating results of operations and financial condition are affected by a variety of factors.  These factors, includeincluding changes in the overall market for retail contracts, wholesale motor vehicle financing, leasing or dealer financing, the new and used vehicle market, changes in the level of sales of Toyota, Lexus, and private label vehicles, the rate of growth in the number and average balance of customer accounts, the U.S. regulatory environment, competition from other financiers, rate of default by our customers, changes in the U.S. and international wholesale capital funding markets, our credit ratings, the used vehicle market,success of efforts to expand our product lines, levels of operating and administrative expenses (including,including, but not limited to, personnel costs, technology costs and premises costs (including costs associated with reorganization or relocation), general economic conditions, inflation, consequences from changes in tax laws, and fiscal and monetary policies in the United States,U.S., Europe and other countries in which we issue debt. Further, a significant and sustained increase in fuel prices could lead to diminishedlower new and used vehicle purchases. This could reduce the demand for automotive retail, lease, and wholesale financing. In turn, lower used vehicle values could affect return rates, charge-offs, and depreciation on operating leases.

Economic slowdown and recession in the United States may lead to diminished consumer and business confidence, inflation, lower household incomes, increases in unemployment rates, andhigher consumer debt levels as well as higher consumer and commercial bankruptcy filings, allany of which could adversely affect vehicle sales and discretionary consumer spending. These conditions may decrease the demand for our financing products, as well as increase our delinquencies and credit losses. In addition, because our credit exposures are generally collateralized by vehicles, the severity of losses can be particularly affected by declines in used vehicle values. Dealers mayare also be affected by economic slowdown and recession, which in turn may increaseincreases the risk of default of certain dealers within our dealer portfolio.

Elevated levels of market disruption and volatility includingglobally or in the United States and in Europe,U.S. could increase our cost of capital and adversely affect our ability to access the global capital markets and fund our business in a similar manner, and at a similar cost as we have hadto the funding raised in the past. These market conditions could also have an adverse effect on our operating results of operations and financial condition by diminishing the value of our investment portfolio and increasing our cost of funding. If as a result we increase the rates we charge to our customers and dealers, our competitive position could be negatively affected.

Challenging market conditions may result in less liquidity, greater volatility, widening of credit spreads and lack of price transparency in credit markets. Changes in investment markets, including changes in interest rates, exchange rates and returns from equity, property, and other investments, will affect (directly or indirectly) our financial performance.

During a continued and sustained period of market disruption and volatility:

there can be no assurance that we will continue to have access to the capital markets in a similar manner and at a similar cost as we have had in the past;
issues of debt securities may be undertaken at spreads above benchmark rates that are greater than those on similar issuances undertaken during prior periods;
we may be subject to over-reliance on a particular funding source or a simultaneous increase in funding costs across a broad range of sources; and
the ratio of our short-term debt outstanding to total debt outstanding may increase if negative conditions in the debt markets lead us to replace some maturing long-term liabilities with short-term liabilities (for example, commercial paper).

14


Table of Contents

Any of these developments could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Geopolitical conditions and other market events may also impact our operating results. Anyresults of operations. Restrictive exchange or import controls or other disruptive trade policies, disruption of operations as a result of systemic political or military actionseconomic instability (including any uncertainty over the U.S. government debt ceiling), adverse changes to tax laws and regulations, social unrest, outbreak of war or expansion of hostilities (including the current conflict in Ukraine), health epidemics and other outbreaks, climate-related risk, and acts of terrorism, could lead to among other things, declines in market liquidity and activity levels, volatile market conditions, a contraction of available credit, inflation, fluctuations in interest rates, weaker economic growth, and reduced business confidence on an international level, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in interest rates and credit spreads may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

U.S. benchmark interest rates and credit spreads have both increased during fiscal 2023. When interest rates are high or increasing, we generally expect to earn higher financing revenue from our new originations. However, during fiscal 2023, increasing rates have and in the future could continue to have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations by increasing our cost of capital and the rates we charge to our customers and dealers, which could, in turn, decrease our financing volumes and market share, as a result of customers and dealers seeking alternative solutions or increasing the amount of cash purchases, thereby resulting in a decline in our competitive position. On the other hand, a low or negative interest rate environment may increase our financing volumes and market share, however it could also have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations by reducing returns on our investments in marketable securities and compressing our net interest margin. When credit spreads widen, it becomes more expensive for us to borrow. Our credit spreads may widen or narrow not only in response to terrorism, regional conflict or other events could adversely affectand circumstances that are specific to us but also as a result of general economic and geopolitical events and conditions. Changes in credit spreads will affect, positively or industry conditions.negatively, the value of our derivatives, which could result in volatility in our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

Our operating results of operations and financial condition are substantially dependent upon the sale of Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicles, as well as our ability to offer competitive financing and insurancevoluntary protection products.

We primarily provide a variety of finance and insurancevoluntary protection products to authorized Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label dealers and their customers in the United States.U.S. Accordingly, our business is substantially dependent upon the sale of Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicles in the United States.U.S. Changes in the volume of sales may result from governmental action or changes in governmental regulation or trade policies, changes in consumer demand, new vehicle incentive programs, recalls, the actual or perceived quality, safety or reliability of Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicles, economic conditions, inflation, increased competition, increases in the price of vehicles due to increased raw material costs, changes in pricing ofimport fees or tariffs on raw materials or imported units duevehicles, changes to or withdrawals from trade agreements, currency fluctuations, or other reasons,fluctuations in interest rates, decreased or delayed vehicle production due to extreme weather conditions, natural disasters, supply chain interruptions, including shortages of parts, components or raw materials, or other events. For example, our affiliate, TMNA, and our ultimate parent, TMC, have continued to experience a decrease in new inventory resulting from production constraints due to supply shortages affecting the automotive industry and continued steady demand in the U.S. for new vehicles. Any negative impact on the volume of TMSToyota, Lexus, and private label vehicle sales could in turnthe U.S. could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial position.condition.

Additionally, while TMS is the primary distributor of Toyota and Lexus vehicles in the U.S. While TMNA conducts extensive market research before launching new or refreshed vehicles and introducing new services, many factors both within and outside TMS’sTMNA’s control affect the success of new or existing products and services in the marketplace. Offering vehicles and services that customers want and value can mitigate the risks of increasing price competition and declining demand, but products and services that are perceived to be less desirable (whether in terms of product mix, price, quality, styling, safety, overall value, fuel efficiency, or other attributes) and the level of availability of products and services that are desirable can negatively exacerbate these risks. With increased consumer interconnectedness through the internet, social media, and other media, mere allegations relating to quality, safety, fuel efficiency, corporate social responsibility (including related to climate change or other environmental issues), or other key attributes can negatively impact TMS’sTMNA’s reputation or market acceptance of its products or services, even where such allegations prove to be inaccurate or unfounded. Any negative impact to TMNA’s reputation or market acceptance of its products or services could have an adverse impact on vehicle sales, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.


15


Table of Contents

The volume of TMNA sales may also be affected by Toyota’s ability to successfully grow through investments in the area of emerging opportunities such as mobility and connected services, vehicle electrification, fuel cell technology and autonomy, which depends on many factors, including advancements in technology, regulatory changes, and other factors that are difficult to predict.


We operate in a highly competitive environment and compete with other financial institutions and, to a lesser extent, other automobile manufacturer’smanufacturers’ affiliated finance companies primarily through service, quality, our relationship with TMS,TMNA, and financing rates. TMS is the primary distributor of Toyota, LexusTMNA sponsors subvention, cash, and Scion vehicles in the United States and sponsors subventioncontractual residual value support incentive programs offered by us on certain new and used Toyota Lexus and ScionLexus vehicles. Our ability to offer competitive financing and insurancevoluntary protection products in the United StatesU.S. depends in part on the level of TMSTMNA sponsored subvention, cash, and contractual residual value support incentive program activity, which varies based on TMSTMNA marketing strategies, economic conditions, and the volume of vehicle sales, among other factors. Any negative impact on the level of TMSTMNA sponsored subvention, cash, and contractual residual value support incentive programs could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Changes in consumer behavior could affect the automotive industry, TMNA and TMC, and, as a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition.

A number of trends are affecting the automotive industry. These include a market shift from cars to sport utility vehicles (“SUVs”) and trucks, high demand for incentives, the rise of mobility services such as vehicle sharing and ride hailing, the development of autonomous and alternative-energy vehicles, the impact of demographic shifts on attitudes and behaviors toward vehicle ownership and use, the development of flexible alternatives to traditional financing and leasing such as subscription service offerings, changing expectations around the vehicle buying experience, increased focus on climate-related initiatives and regulation, adjustments in the geographic distribution of new and used vehicle sales, and advancements in communications and technology. Any one or more of these trends could adversely affect the automotive industry, TMNA and TMC, and could in turn have an impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Recalls and other related announcements by TMSTMNA or private label companies could affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and operating results.condition.

TMSTMNA, or other manufacturers of the vehicles we finance, periodically conducts vehicle recalls which could include temporary suspensions of sales and production of certain Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicle models. Because our business is substantially dependent upon the sale of Toyota Lexus and ScionLexus vehicles, such events could adversely affect our business. A decrease in the level of sales, including as a result of the actual or perceived quality, safety or reliability of Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicles or a change in standards of regulatory bodies will have a negative impact on the level of our financing volume, insuranceand voluntary protection products volume, earning assets, Net financing revenues and revenues.Voluntary protection contract revenues and insurance earned premiums. The credit performance of our dealer and consumer portfolios may also be adversely affected. In addition, a decline in the values of used Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicles would have a negative effect on realizedresidual values and return rates, which, in turn, could increase depreciation expense and credit losses. Further, certain of TMCC’s affiliated entities are or may become subject to litigation and governmental investigations and have been or may become subject to fines or other penalties. These factors could affect sales of Toyota, Lexus and Scionprivate label vehicles and, accordingly, could have a negative effect on our operatingbusiness, results of operations and financial condition.

Our borrowing costs and accessIf we are unable to the unsecured debt capital markets depend significantly on the credit ratings of TMCC and its parent companies and our credit support arrangements.

The availability and cost of financing is influenced by credit ratings, which are intended to be an indicator of the creditworthiness of a particular company, security or obligation.  Our credit ratings depend, in large part, on the existence of the credit support arrangements with TFSC and TMC and on the financial condition and operating results of TMC.  If these arrangements (or replacement arrangements acceptable to the rating agencies) become unavailable to us,compete successfully or if the credit ratings of the credit support providers were lowered, our credit ratings would be adversely impacted.

Credit rating agencies which rate the credit of TMC and its affiliates, including TMCC, may qualify or alter ratings at any time.  Global economic conditions and other geopolitical factors may directly or indirectly affect such ratings.  Any downgradecompetition increases in the sovereign credit ratings of the United States or Japan may directly or indirectly have a negative effect on the ratings of TMC and TMCC.  Downgrades or placement on review for possible downgrades could resultbusinesses in an increase inwhich we operate, our borrowing costs as well as reduced access to the global unsecured debt capital markets.  In addition, depending on the level of the downgrade, we may be required to post an increased amount of cash collateral under certain of our derivative agreements.  These factors would have a negative impact on our competitive position, operating results, liquidity and financial condition.

A disruption in our funding sources and access to the capital markets would have an adverse effect on our liquidity.

Liquidity risk is the risk arising from our ability to meet obligations in a timely manner when they come due. Our liquidity strategy is to maintain the capacity to fund assets and repay liabilities in a timely and cost-effective manner even in adverse market conditions. An inability to meet obligations in a timely manner when they come due would have a negative impact on our ability to refinance maturing debt and fund new asset growth and would have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion of liquidity risk.



Our allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We maintain an allowance for credit losses to cover probable and estimable losses as of the balance sheet date resulting from the non-performance of our customers and dealers under their contractual obligations.  The determination of the allowance involves significant assumptions, complex analyses, and management judgment and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks using existing qualitative and quantitative information, any or all of which may change. For example, we review and analyze external factors, including changes in economic conditions, actual or perceived quality, safety and reliability of Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles, unemployment levels, the used vehicle market, and consumer behavior, among other factors.  In addition, internal factors, such as purchase quality mix and operational changes are also considered.  A change in any of these factors would cause a change in estimated probable losses.  As a result, our allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover our actual losses.  In addition, changes in accounting rules and related guidance, new information regarding existing portfolios, and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require changes to the allowance for credit losses.  A material increase in our allowance for credit losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Estimates” for further discussion of the estimates involved in determining the allowance for credit losses and Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the methodology used in determining the allowance for credit losses.

We use estimates and assumptions in determining the fair value of certain assets. If our estimates or assumptions prove to be incorrect, our financial condition and results of operations could be materiallynegatively affected.

We operate in a highly competitive environment. We compete with other financial institutions including national and adversely affected.

We use various estimatesregional commercial banks, credit unions, savings and assumptions in determining the fair value of many of our assets, including certain marketable securitiesloan associations, finance companies, and derivatives, which, in some cases, do not have an established market value or are not publicly traded. Our assumptions and estimates may be inaccurate for many reasons.  For example, assumptions and estimates often involve matters that are inherently difficult to predict and are beyond our control (for example, macro-economic conditions and their impact on our dealers).a lesser extent, other automobile manufacturers’ affiliated finance companies. In addition, they often involve complex interactions between a number of dependent and independent variables, factors, and other assumptions. As a result, our actual experience may differ materially from these estimates and assumptions. A material difference between our estimates and assumptions and our actual experience may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Fluctuationsonline financing options provide consumers with alternative financing sources. Increases in valuation of investment securities or significant fluctuations in investment market prices could negatively affect our revenues and results of operations.

Investment market prices, in general, are subject to fluctuation. Consequently, the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value and could negatively affect our revenues. Additionally, negative fluctuations in the value of available-for-sale investment securities could result in unrealized losses recorded in Other comprehensive income or in other-than-temporary impairment within our results of operations. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the investment, the relative price of alternative investments, national and international events, or general market conditions.

Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our accounting and financial reporting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which are periodically revised and/or expanded. The application of accounting principles is also subject to varying interpretations over time. Accordingly, we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards or comply with revised interpretations that are issued from time to time by various parties, including accounting standard setters and those who interpret the standards, such as the FASB and the SEC and our independent registered public accounting firm. Those changes could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The FASB has recently proposed new financial accounting standards, and has many active projects underway which include potential for significant changes in the accounting for financial instruments, including the allowance for credit losses, among others. It is possible that any changes, if enacted, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.


A decrease in the residual values of our off-lease vehicles and a higher number of returned lease assets could negatively affect our operating results and financial condition.

We are exposed to risk of loss on the disposition of leased vehicles if sales proceeds realized upon the sale of returned lease assets are not sufficient to cover the residual value that was estimated at lease inception and if the number of returned lease assets is higher than anticipated.  To the extent the estimated end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle is lower than the residual value established at lease inception, the residual value of the leased vehicle is adjusted downward so that the carrying value at lease-end will approximate the estimated end-of-term market value.  Among other factors, local, regional and national economic conditions, new vehicle pricing, new vehicle incentive programs, new vehicle sales, the actual or perceived quality, safety or reliability of vehicles, future plans for new Toyota, Lexus and Scion product introductions, competitive actions and behavior, product attributes of popular vehicles, the mix of used vehicle supply, the level of current used vehicle values and inventory levels, and fuel prices heavily influence used vehicle prices and thus the actual residual value of off-lease vehicles.  Differences between the actual residual values realized on leased vehicles and our estimates of such values at lease inception could have a negative impact on our operating results and financial condition, due to the impact of higher-than-anticipated losses recorded as Depreciation on operating leases in our Consolidated Statement of Income.  The return of a higher number of leased assets could also impact the amount of depreciation expense recorded in our Consolidated Statement of Income.

Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – Residual Value Risk”, “– Financial Condition – Disposition of Off-Lease Vehicles” and “– Financial Condition – Depreciation on Operating Leases” for further discussion of current lease trends.

We are exposed to customer and dealer credit risk, which could negatively affect our operating results and financial condition.

Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the failure of a customer or dealer to meet the terms of any retail or lease contract with us or otherwise fail to perform as agreed.  The level of credit risk in our consumer portfolio is influenced primarily by two factors: the total number of contracts that experience default (“default frequency”) and the amount of loss per occurrence (“loss severity”), which in turn are influenced by various economic factors, the used vehicle market, purchase quality mix, contract term length, and operational changes as discussed below.

The level of credit risk in our dealer portfolio is influenced primarily by the financial strength of dealers within our portfolio, dealer concentration, collateral quality, and other economic factors.  The financial strength of dealers within our portfolio is influenced by general macroeconomic conditions, the overall demand for new and used vehicles, and the financial condition of automotive manufacturers, among other factors.  An increase in credit risk would increase our provision for credit losses, which would have a negative impact on our operating results and financial condition.

Economic slowdown and recession in the United States, natural disasters and other factors increase the risk that a customer or dealer may not meet the terms of a retail or lease contract with us or may otherwise fail to perform as agreed.  A weak economic environment evidenced by, among other things, unemployment, underemployment, and consumer bankruptcy filings, may affect some of our customers’ ability to make their scheduled payments. There can be no assurance that our monitoring of credit risk and our efforts to mitigate credit risk are or will be sufficient to prevent an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Our operating results, financial condition and cash flow may be adversely affected by changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and market prices.

Market risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates cause volatility in our operating results, financial condition and cash flow.  An increase in market interest ratespressures could have an adverse effectimpact on our business,contract volume, market share, Net financing revenues, Voluntary protection contract revenues and insurance earned premiums. Further, the financial condition and operating results by increasing our cost of capital and the rates we charge to our customers and dealers, thereby affecting our competitive position.  We use various derivative instruments to manage our market risk.  However, changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and market prices cannot always be predicted or hedged.  Changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates could affect the valueviability of our derivatives,competitors and peers may have an adverse impact on the financial services industry in which we operate, resulting in a decrease in the demand for our products and services. This could result in volatility in our operating results and financial condition.  Market risk also includeshave an adverse impact on the risk that the valuevolume of our investment portfolio could decline.business and our results of operations.


16


Table of Contents


A failure or interruption in our operations could adversely affect our operating results of operations and financial condition.

Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from, among other factors, lack of established processes, inadequate or failed processes, systems or internal controls, theft, fraud, orextreme weather conditions, natural disasters (such as wildfires, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, hurricanes including earthquakes.an increase in the frequency of such conditions and disasters as the result of climate change) or other catastrophes (including without limitation, explosions, terrorist attacks, riots, civil disturbances and health epidemics and other outbreaks). Operational risk can occur in many forms including, but not limited to, errors, business interruptions, failure of controls, failure of systems or other technology, deficiencies in our insurancevoluntary protection product operations risk management program, inappropriate behavior or misconduct by our employees or those contracted to perform services for us, and vendors that do not perform in accordance with their contractual agreements.  Our corporate headquarters is located in the Los Angeles, California area, which is near major earthquake faults. We have established business recovery plans to address interruptions in our operations, but we can give no assurance that these plans will be adequate to remediate all events that we may face. A catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business or information technology systems could harm our ability to conduct normal business operations. These events can potentially result in financial losses or other damage to us, including damage to our reputation.

We rely on a framework of internal controls designed to provide a sound and well-controlled operating environment. Due to the complexity of our business and the challenges inherent in implementing control structures across large organizations, control issues could be identified in the future that could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

On April 28, 2014, we issued a press release announcing that, as part of TMC’s planned consolidation of its three separate North American headquarters for manufacturing, sales and marketing to a single new headquarters facility in Plano, Texas, our corporate headquarters would move from Torrance, California, to Plano, Texas, beginning in 2017. We do not expect that the relocation

In addition, many parts of our headquarters will changebusiness, including software, technology, marketing and finance, are dependent on key personnel. Competition for such employees is intense, which may increase our corporate or leadership structure.  However, we note that there are uncertainties relatedoperating and administrative expenses and lead to the relocation. We can give no assurance that the relocation will be completed as planned or within the expected timing.  In addition, the pending relocation may involve significant costother changes including flexible work arrangements and other considerations. Our future success depends on our ability to usretain existing, and the expected benefits of the move may not be fully realized dueattract, hire and integrate new key personnel and other necessary employees. Any failure to associated disruption to operations and to personnel.  

A failure or interruption of the information systems on which we rely, or a security breach or a cyber-attackdo so could adversely affect our business, operating results of operations and financial condition.

We rely on internalOur private label financial services for third-party automotive and third party information and technological systemsmobility companies may expose us to manageadditional risks that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and are exposedfinancial condition.

In fiscal 2021, we began providing private label financial services to riskthird-party automotive and mobility companies commencing with the provision of loss resulting from breachesservices to Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (“Mazda”). Pursuant to the agreement with Mazda, we currently offer exclusive private label automotive retail, lease, voluntary protection products and dealer financing products and services marketed under the brands Mazda Financial Services and Mazda Protection Products to Mazda customers and dealers in the U.S. The agreement with Mazda is for an initial term of approximately five years.

In fiscal 2022, we announced that we entered into a nonbinding letter of intent with Bass Pro Shops to provide private label financial services for Bass Pro Shop’s boats, all-terrain vehicle products, and other mobility products. The Company began to provide inventory financing for Bass Pro Shops, its affiliates, and authorized independent dealers in fiscal 2023, with additional private label services, including consumer financing and voluntary protection products and services, to be added over time.

We are currently leveraging our existing processes and personnel to originate and service the new assets and we expect to make certain technology investments to support the Bass Pro Shops program; however, we will continue to evaluate the private label financial services business, which may include partnering with or transitioning the business to our affiliates, some of which are not consolidated with TMCC.

Although we intend to leverage our strengths and capabilities to serve and retain new private label customers, we may encounter additional costs and may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of our private label financial services program. The provision and or servicing of wholesale and retail financing to private label dealers and customers may result in additional credit risk exposure, which if we are unable to appropriately monitor and mitigate may result in an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Our private label financial services may also expose us to additional operating risks related to consumer demand for private label vehicles or mobility products, the profitability and financial condition of private label companies, the level of the private label incentivized retail financing, recalls announced by the private label and the perceived quality, safety or reliability of the private label vehicles or mobility products, and changes in prices of the private label used vehicles and their effect on residual values of the private label off-lease vehicles and return rates, each of which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

17


Table of Contents

We face various risks related to health epidemics and other outbreaks, which have had and may continue to have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We face various risks related to health epidemics and other outbreaks, such as the global outbreak of coronavirus (“COVID-19”), which have led, and may in the future lead, to periodic disruption and volatility in the global capital markets and in the economies of many nations, including the United States, and which in turn, could have a material impact on our financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations. Although U.S. and global economies have begun to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, certain adverse consequences of the pandemic, including labor shortages, disruptions of global supply chains and inflationary pressures, continue to impact the U.S. and global economies, which have continued to impact certain of our financial results during fiscal year 2023, including a decrease in financing volume due to lower dealer inventory levels, which has resulted in lower levels of subvention and incentives as well as increased competition from other financial institutions. The long-term and ultimate impacts of the social, economic, and financial disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, including negative impacts on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, will depend on future developments that remain uncertain, including, for example, future actions taken by governmental authorities, central banks and other parties in response to the pandemic and its adverse consequences, and the effects on our customers, dealers, and competitors.

The likelihood of future health epidemics or other outbreaks, the ultimate duration of any pandemic, and the possibility of a resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic or similar public health issues are uncertain. A new pandemic or the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic may subject us to, among several other things, increased delinquencies and defaults by our customers and dealers, the reinstatement of certain payment relief options, closures of plants by TMNA, and disruption among our supply chain and with other third-party vendors.

18


Table of Contents

FINANCIAL MARKET AND ECONOMIC RISKS

Our borrowing costs and access to the unsecured debt capital markets depend significantly on the credit ratings of TMCC and its parent companies and our credit support arrangements.

The availability and cost of financing is influenced by credit ratings, which are intended to be an indicator of the creditworthiness of a particular company, security or obligation. Our credit ratings depend, in large part, on the existence of the credit support arrangements with TFSC and TMC and on the financial condition and results of operations of TMC. If these arrangements (or replacement arrangements acceptable to the rating agencies) become unavailable to us, or if the credit ratings of the credit support providers were lowered, our credit ratings would be adversely impacted.

Credit rating agencies which rate the credit of TMC and its affiliates, including TMCC, may qualify or alter ratings at any time. Global economic conditions, including the ongoing impact of COVID-19 and other failuresgeopolitical factors may directly or indirectly affect such ratings. Any downgrade in the sovereign credit ratings of these systems.  Any failurethe U.S. or interruptionJapan may directly or indirectly have a negative effect on the ratings of TMC and TMCC. Downgrades or placement on review for possible downgrades could result in an increase in our information systems orborrowing costs as well as reduced access to the third party information systemsglobal unsecured debt capital markets. These factors would have a negative impact on which we rely as a resultour competitive position, results of inadequate or failed processes or systems, human errors, employee misconduct, catastrophic events, external or internal security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, malware, misplaced or lost data, or other events could disruptoperations, liquidity and financial condition.

A disruption in our normal operating proceduresfunding sources and access to the capital markets would have an adverse effect on our business, operatingliquidity.

Liquidity risk is the risk arising from our ability to meet obligations in a timely manner when they come due. Our liquidity strategy is to maintain the capacity to fund assets and repay liabilities in a timely and cost-effective manner even in adverse market conditions. A disruption in our funding sources may adversely affect our ability to meet our obligations as they become due. An inability to meet obligations in a timely manner would have a negative impact on our ability to refinance maturing debt and fund new asset growth and would have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We collectRefer to Item 7. Management’s Discussion and store certain personalAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Liquidity and Capital Resources”for further discussion of liquidity risk.

Our allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial informationcondition.

We maintain an allowance for credit losses to cover lifetime expected credit losses as of the balance sheet date resulting from employees,the non-performance of our customers and dealers under their contractual obligations. The determination of the allowance involves significant assumptions, complex analyses, and management judgment and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks using existing qualitative and quantitative information. Actual results may differ from our estimates or assumptions. For example, we review and analyze external factors, including changes in economic conditions, actual or perceived quality, safety and reliability of Toyota, Lexus, and private label vehicles, unemployment levels, the used vehicle market, and consumer behavior, among other third parties.  Security breachesfactors. Internal factors, such as purchase quality mix and operational changes are also considered. A change in any of these factors would cause a change in estimated lifetime expected credit losses. As a result, our allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover our actual losses. In addition, changes in accounting rules and related guidance, new information regarding existing portfolios, and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require changes to the allowance for credit losses. A material increase in our allowance for credit losses may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Refer to Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Critical Accounting Estimates” for further discussion of the estimates involved in determining the allowance for credit losses and Note 4 – Allowance for Credit Losses of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the methodology used in determining the allowance for credit losses.

Our business and operations make extensive use of quantitative models, estimates and assumptions. If our design, implementation or cyber-attacks involvinguse of models is flawed or if actual results differ from our systemsestimates or facilities,assumptions, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

We use quantitative models, estimates and assumptions to price products and services, measure risk, estimate asset and liability values, assess liquidity, manage our balance sheet, and otherwise conduct our business and operations. If the design, implementation, or use of any of these models is flawed or if actual results differ from our estimates or assumptions, it may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, to the extent that any inaccurate model outputs are used in reports to regulatory agencies or the systemspublic, we could be subjected to

19


Table of Contents

supervisory actions, litigation, and other proceedings that may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Assumptions and estimates often involve matters that require the exercise of management’s judgment, are inherently difficult to predict and are beyond our control (for example, macro-economic conditions). In addition, such assumptions and estimates often involve complex interactions between a number of dependent and independent variables, factors, and other assumptions. As a result, our actual experience may differ materially from these estimates and assumptions. A material difference between our estimates and assumptions and our actual experience may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Fluctuations in the valuation of investment securities or facilitiessignificant fluctuations in investment market prices could negatively affect our Net financing revenues and results of operations.

Investment market prices, in general, are subject to fluctuation, which may result from perceived changes in the underlying characteristics of the investment, the relative price of alternative investments, geopolitical conditions, or general market conditions. Negative fluctuations in the fair value of equity investments and credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities may adversely affect our Net financing revenues and results of operations. Additionally, the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value and could negatively affect our Net financing revenues and other revenues.

A decrease in the residual values of our service providers,off-lease vehicles and a higher number of returned lease assets could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We are exposed to residual value risk on the disposition of leased vehicles if sales proceeds realized upon the sale of returned lease assets are not sufficient to cover the residual value that was estimated at lease inception and if the number of returned lease assets is higher than anticipated. To the extent the estimated end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle is lower than the residual value established at lease inception, the residual value of the leased vehicle is adjusted downward resulting in additional depreciation expense over the term of the lease contract so that the carrying value at lease-end will approximate the estimated end-of-term market value. Among other factors, local, regional and national economic conditions, inflation, new vehicle pricing, new vehicle incentive programs, new vehicle sales, the actual or perceived quality, safety or reliability of our vehicles, future plans for new Toyota, Lexus, and private label product introductions, competitive actions and behavior, product attributes of popular vehicles, the mix of used vehicle supply, the level of current used vehicle values and inventory levels, and fuel prices heavily influence used vehicle values and thus the actual residual value of off-lease vehicles. Differences between the actual residual values realized on leased vehicles and our estimates of such values at lease inception could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition, due to the impact of higher-than-anticipated Depreciation on operating leases recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Actual return volumes may be higher than expected which can be impacted by higher contractual lease-end residual values relative to market values, a higher market supply of certain models of used vehicles, new vehicle incentive programs, and general economic conditions. The return of a higher number of leased vehicles could also impact the amount of depreciation expense recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Income, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Refer to Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Financial Condition – Residual Value Risk”, “Financial Condition – Disposition of Off-Lease Vehicles” and “Financial Condition – Depreciation on Operating Leases” for further discussion of current lease trends.

We are exposed to customer and dealer credit risk, which could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the failure of a customer or dealer to meet the terms of any retail, lease or dealer financing contract with us or otherwise fail to perform as agreed. An increase in credit risk would increase our provision for credit losses, which would have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that our monitoring of credit risk and our efforts to mitigate credit risk are or will be sufficient to prevent an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The level of credit risk in our retail loan portfolio is influenced primarily by two factors: the total number of contracts that experience default (“default frequency”) and the amount of loss per occurrence (“loss severity”), which in turn are influenced by various economic factors, the used vehicle market, purchase quality mix, contract term length, and operational changes. The used vehicle market is impacted by the supply of, and demand for, used vehicles, interest rates, inflation, new vehicle incentive programs, the manufacturer’s actual or perceived reputation for quality, safety, and reliability, and the general economic outlook.

20


Table of Contents

The level of credit risk in our dealer portfolio is influenced primarily by the financial strength of dealers within our portfolio, dealer concentration, collateral quality, and other economic factors. The financial strength of dealers within our portfolio is influenced by general macroeconomic conditions, the overall demand for new and used vehicles, and the financial condition of automotive manufacturers, among other factors.

Economic slowdown and recession in the U.S., extreme weather conditions, natural disasters, health epidemics, and other factors increase the risk that a customer or dealer may not meet the terms of a retail, lease or dealer financing contract with us or may otherwise fail to perform as agreed. A weak economic environment evidenced by, among other things, unemployment, underemployment, and consumer bankruptcy filings, may affect some of our customers’ and dealers’ ability to make their scheduled payments.

Our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely affected by market risks related to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and market prices.

Market risk is the risk that changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates cause volatility in our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We use various derivative instruments to manage our market risk. However, changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and market prices cannot always be predicted or hedged. Changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates (due to inflationary pressure or other factors) could affect our interest expense and the value of our derivatives, which could result in volatility in our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

The transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and the adoption of alternative reference rates (“ARRs”) could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

We are exposed to LIBOR-based financial instruments, including through certain of our dealer financing activities, derivative contracts, secured and unsecured debt, and investment securities. The transition away from the use of LIBOR to alternative rates and other potential interest rate benchmark reforms is continuing. These reforms have caused and may in the future cause such rates to perform differently than in the past, or to disappear entirely, or have other consequences which cannot be predicted.

The publication of non-U.S. dollar LIBOR rates on a representative basis, as well as the publication of the lesser used 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar LIBOR tenors, ceased as of the end of December 2021. The most commonly used U.S. dollar LIBOR tenors are expected to continue to be published until June 30, 2023.

In June 2017, the New York Federal Reserve’s Alternative Reference Rates Committee recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as an alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. On December 16, 2022, the Federal Reserve Board adopted the final rule that implemented The Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act passed by Congress in March 2022 (“LIBOR Act”). The LIBOR Act identified benchmark replacement rates based on SOFR for covered derivative transactions and cash transactions where a practicable interest rate fallback method has not been established by June 30, 2023.

The composition and characteristics of SOFR are not the same as those of LIBOR. As a result, there can be no assurance that SOFR or any ARR will perform in the same way as LIBOR would have at any time, including, without limitation, as a result of changes in interest and yield rates in the market, market volatility or global or regional economic, financial, political, regulatory, judicial or other events. With limited operating history, it remains unknown whether SOFR will continue to evolve and what the effects of its implementation may be on the markets for financial instruments. Although the LIBOR Act and its implementing regulations include safe harbors if the Federal Reserve Board’s SOFR-based replacement rates are used, these safe harbors are untested, and we could still be exposed to risks associated with disputes and litigation with counterparties and other market participants in connection with implementing replacement rates for LIBOR.

To facilitate an orderly transition from LIBOR to ARRs, we established an initiative led by senior management, with Board and committee oversight. As a result of this initiative, we have committed to using SOFR linked rates in connection with various borrowing arrangements and Prime in connection with various lending arrangements. Nevertheless, we may continue to be subject to risk on certain outstanding instruments which rely on LIBOR. Those risks arise in connection with transitioning such instruments to a new reference rate, the taking of discretionary actions (for example, under fallback provisions) or the negotiation of fallback provisions and final amendments to existing LIBOR based agreements. If a contract or instrument is not transitioned to a new reference rate and LIBOR ceases to exist, we may experience increased interest rate risk. In addition, we may be dependent on third parties to upgrade their systems, software, and other critical functions to assist in our orderly transition from LIBOR. A failure to properly transition away from LIBOR could expose us to a risk of loss of personally identifiable information of customers, employeesvarious financial, operational, and third parties or other proprietary or competitively sensitive information, business interruptions, regulatory scrutiny, actions and penalties, litigation, reputational harm, and a loss of confidence, all of which could potentially have an adverse impact on future business with current and potential customers.

We rely on encryption and other information security technologies licensed from third parties to provide security controls necessary to help in securing online transmission of confidential information pertaining to customers and employees.  Advances in information system capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments may result in a compromise or breach of the technology that we use to protect sensitive data.  A party who is able to circumvent our security measures by methods such as hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruption in our operations.  We may be required to expend capital and other resources to protect against such security breaches or cyber-attacks or to remediate problems caused by such breaches or attacks.  Our security measures are designed to protect against security breaches and cyber-attacks, but our failure to prevent such security breaches and cyber-attacks could subject us to liability, decrease our profitability and damage our reputation.


We could be subjected to cyber-attacks that could result in slow performance and unavailability of our information systems for some customers.  Information security risks, have increased recently because of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists, and others.  We may not be able to anticipate or implement effective preventative measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources.  The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, we periodically upgrade or replace our existing transaction systems, which could have a significant impact on our abilityfinancial condition and results of operations.

21


Table of Contents

Refer to conduct our core business operationsLIBOR Transition” within Item 7. Management’s Discussion and increase our riskAnalysis of loss resulting from disruptionsFinancial Condition and Results of normal operating processes and procedures that may occur during the implementation of new systems. Operations for additional information.

The failure or commercial soundness of our counterparties and other financial institutions may have an effect on our liquidity, operating results of operations or financial condition.

We have exposure to many different financial institutions, and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial industry. Our debt, derivative and investment transactions, and our ability to borrow under committed and uncommitted credit facilities, could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. We cannot guarantee that our ability to borrow under committed and uncommitted credit facilities will continue to be available on reasonable terms or at all. Deterioration of social, political, labor, or economic conditions in a specific country or region may also adversely affect the ability of financial institutions, including our derivative counterparties and lenders, to perform their contractual obligations. Financial institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, lending and other relationships, and as a result, financial and political difficulties in one country or region may adversely affect financial institutions in other jurisdictions, including those with which we have relationships. The failure of any financial institutions and other counterparties to which we have exposure, directly or indirectly, to perform their contractual obligations, and any losses resulting from that failure, may materially and adversely affect our liquidity, operating results of operations or financial condition.

If we are unable to compete successfully or if competition increases in the businesses in which we operate, our operating results could be negatively affected.

We operate in a highly competitive environment.  We compete with other financial institutions including national and regional commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, finance companies, and to a lesser extent, other automobile manufacturers’ affiliated finance companies.  Increases in competitive pressures could have an adverse impact on our contract volume, market share, revenues, and margins.  Further, the financial condition and viability of our competitors and peers may have an impact on the financial services industry in which we operate, resulting in changes in the demand for our products and services.  This could have an adverse impact on the volume of our business and our operating results.

Our insurancevoluntary protection operations could suffer losses if our reserves are insufficient to absorb actual losses.

Our insurancevoluntary protection operations are subject to the risk of loss if our reserves for unearned premium andvoluntary protection contract revenues and insurance earned premiums on unexpired policies and agreementscontracts in force are not sufficient. Using historical loss experience as a basis for recognizing revenue over the term of the contract or policy may result in the timing of revenue recognition varying materially from the actual loss development. Our insurancevoluntary protection operations are also subject to the risk of loss if our reserves for reported losses, losses incurred but not reported, and loss adjustment expenses are not sufficient. Because we use estimates in establishing reserves, actual losses may vary from amounts established in earlier periods.periods as a result of changes in frequency and severity.

We are exposed to risk transfer credit risk which could negatively impact our insurance voluntary protectionoperations.

Risk transfer credit risk is the risk that a reinsurer or other company assuming liabilities relating to our insurancevoluntary protection operations will be unable to meet its obligations under the terms of our agreement with them. Such failure could result in losses to our insurancevoluntary protection operations.


22


Table of Contents


A failure or interruption of our information systems could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We rely on our own information systems and third-party information systems to manage our operations, which creates meaningful operational risk for us. Any failure or interruption of our information systems or the third-party information systems on which we rely as a result of inadequate or failed processes or systems, human errors, employee misconduct, catastrophic events, security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, malware, ransomware, misplaced or lost data, or other events could disrupt our normal operating procedures, damage our reputation and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. These operational risks may be increased as a result of remote or hybrid work arrangements.

In addition, we periodically upgrade or replace our existing transaction systems, which could have a significant impact on our ability to conduct our core business operations and increase our risk of loss resulting from disruptions of normal operating processes and procedures that may occur during and after the implementation of new systems. For example, the development and implementation of these new systems and any future upgrades related thereto may require significant expenditures and divert management’s attention and other resources from our core business operations. There are no assurances that these new systems will provide us with the anticipated benefits and efficiencies. There can also be no assurance that the time and resources our management will need to devote to implementation and upgrades, potential delays in the implementation or upgrade or any resulting service interruptions, or any impact on the reliability of our data from any upgrade of our legacy system, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

A security breach or a cyber-attack could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We collect and store certain personal and financial information from customers, employees, and other third parties. Security breaches or cyber-attacks involving our systems or facilities, or the systems or facilities of third-party providers, could expose us to a risk of loss of personal information of customers, employees and third parties or other confidential, proprietary or competitively sensitive information, business interruptions, regulatory scrutiny, actions and penalties, litigation, reputational harm, a loss of confidence, and other financial and non-financial costs, all of which could potentially have an adverse impact on our future business with current and potential customers, results of operations and financial condition.

We rely on encryption and other information security technologies licensed from third parties to provide security controls necessary to help in securing online transmission of confidential information pertaining to customers, employees and other aspects of our business. Advances in information system capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments may result in a compromise or breach of the technology that we use to protect sensitive data. A party who is able to circumvent our security measures by methods such as hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruption in our operations. We may be required to expend capital and other resources to protect against such security breaches or cyber-attacks or to remediate problems caused by such breaches or attacks. Our security measures are designed to protect against security breaches and cyber-attacks, but our failure to prevent such security breaches and cyber-attacks could subject us to liability, decrease our profitability and damage our reputation. Even if a failure of, or interruption in, our systems or facilities is resolved timely or an attempted cyber incident or other security breach is successfully avoided or thwarted, it may require us to expend substantial resources or to take actions that could adversely affect customer satisfaction or behavior and expose us to reputational harm.

We could also be subjected to cyber-attacks that could result in slow performance and loss or temporary unavailability of our information systems. Information security risks have increased because of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of state-sponsored actors, organized crime, perpetrators of fraud, terrorists, and others. In addition, we may have increased cyber-security risks and increased vulnerability to security breaches and other information technology disruptions as a result of increased remote or hybrid work arrangements among our colleagues. We may not be able to anticipate or implement effective preventative measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

23


Table of Contents

Our enterprise data practices, including the collection, use, sharing, disposal and security of personal and financial information of our customers, employees, and third-party individuals are subject to increasingly complex, restrictive, and punitive laws and regulations which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Under these laws and regulations, the failure to maintain compliant data practices could result in consumer complaints, lawsuits and regulatory inquiry, resulting in civil or criminal penalties, as well as brand impact or other harm to our business. In addition, increased consumer sensitivity to real or perceived failures in maintaining acceptable data practices could damage our reputation and deter current and potential customers from using our products and services. For example, well-publicized allegations involving the misuse or inappropriate sharing of personal information have led to expanded governmental scrutiny of practices relating to the safeguarding of personal information and the use or sharing of personal data by companies in the U.S. and other countries. That scrutiny has in some cases resulted in, and could in the future lead to, the adoption of stricter laws and regulations relating to the use and sharing of personal information. For example, some states have enacted and others are considering enacting data protection regimes that grant consumers broad new rights including access to, deletion of, and limiting the sharing of personal information that is collected by businesses and requiring regulated entities to establish measures to identify, manage, secure, track, produce, update and delete personal information. In some jurisdictions, these laws and regulations provide a private right of action that would allow customers to bring suit directly against us for certain violations of these laws and regulations. These types of laws and regulations could prohibit or significantly restrict financial services providers such as TMCC from sharing information among affiliates or with third parties such as vendors, and thereby increase compliance costs, or could restrict TMCC’s use of personal data when developing or offering products or services to customers. These restrictions could inhibit TMCC’s development or marketing of certain products or services or increase the costs of offering them to customers. Because many of these laws and regulations are new, there is little clarity as to their interpretation, as well as a lack of precedent for the scope of enforcement. In addition, these laws are state specific and have specific details that are not uniform state-to-state. The cost of compliance with these laws and regulations will be high and is likely to increase in the future. Any failure or perceived failure to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws and regulations could result in requirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices, significant liabilities or fines, penalties or other sanctions.

The regulatory environment in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.results of operations.

Regulatory risk includes risk arising from failure or alleged failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements and risk of liability and other costs imposed under various laws and regulations, including changes in applicable law, regulation and regulatory guidance.

Consumer Finance Regulation

As a provider of finance insurance and other payment and vehiclevoluntary protection products, we operate in a highly regulated environment. We are subject to state licensing requirements at theand state, level and federal laws and regulations. In addition, we are subject to laws, regulation, examinationgovernmental and investigationregulatory examinations, information-gathering requests, and investigations from time to time at the state and federal levels. We hold lending, leasing, insurance and debt collector licenses where required in the various states in which we do business. We are obligated to comply with periodic reporting requirements and to submit to regular examinations as a condition of maintenance of our licenses and the offering of our products and services. We must comply with laws that regulate our business, including in the areas of marketing, analytics, origination, collection and servicing.

Compliance with applicable law is costly and can affect operating results.our results of operations. Compliance requires forms, processes, procedures, controls and the infrastructure to support these requirements. Compliance may create operational constraints and place limits on pricing, as the laws and regulations in the financial services industry are designed primarily for the protection of consumers. Changes in regulationlaws and regulations could restrict our ability to operate our business as currently operated, could impose substantial additional costs or require us to implement new processes, which could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial performance or financial condition. The failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could result in significant statutory civil and criminal fines, penalties, monetary damages, attorneys’attorney or legal fees and costs, restrictions on our ability to operate our business, possible revocation of licenses and damage to our reputation, brand and valued customer relationships. Any such costs, restrictions, revocations or damage could adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results of operations or financial condition.

AtOur principal consumer finance regulator at the federal level the Dodd-Frank Act has broad implications for the financial services industry and requires the development, adoption and implementation of many regulations.  Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act createdis the CFPB, which has broad regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority over providers of consumer financial products and services.  Two of the primary purposes of the CFPB are to ensure that consumers receive clear and accurate disclosures regarding financial products and to protect consumers from discrimination and unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices.  On August 31, 2015, we became subject to theus. The CFPB’ssupervisory authority when the CFPB’s final rule over “larger participants” in the auto finance industry took effect. Such supervisory authority allows the CFPB,it, among other things, to conduct comprehensive and rigorous examinations to assess our compliance with consumer financial protection laws, which could result in enforcement actions, regulatory fines and mandated changes to our business products, policies and procedures.procedures.

In February 2016,The CFPB’s rulemaking authority includes the CFPB published a list of nine policy priorities it intendsauthority to focus its resources on over the next two years.  These priorities include,promulgate rules regarding, among others, initiation of the rulemaking process regardingother practices, debt collection practices that would apply to third-party collectors and first-party collectors, such as ourselves, and continued examination and investigation of, and potential rulemakingrules regarding consumer credit reporting practices. The timing and impact of these anticipated rules on our business remain uncertain.

24


Table of Contents

In addition, the CFPB has focused on the area of auto finance, particularly with respect to indirect financing arrangements, dealer compensation and fair lending compliance, and questioned the value and increased scrutiny of the marketing and sale of certain ancillary or add-on products, including products similar to those that we finance or sell through TMIS.  Regulators have questioned such products’ value and how such products are marketed and sold.

The CFPB also has enforcement authority under which it is authorized to conduct investigations (which may include a joint investigation with other agencies and regulators) and initiate enforcement actions for violations of federal consumer financial protection laws.  The CFPB and FTC have become more active in investigatingmay investigate the products, services and operations of credit providers, including banks and other finance companies engaged in auto finance activities. BothAs a result of such investigations, the CFPB and FTC have announced various enforcement actions against lenders in the past few years involving significant penalties, consent orders, cease and desist orders and similar remedies that, if applicable to auto finance providers andus or the products, services and operations we offer, may require us to cease or alter certain business practices, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.  We expect the CFPB’s investigation of,liquidity. Supervision and initiation of enforcement actions against, credit providers, whether on its own initiative or jointly with otherinvestigations by these agencies and regulators, will continue for the foreseeable future.  CFPB supervision and enforcement actions, if any, may result in monetary penalties, increase our compliance costs, require changes in our business practices, affect our competitiveness, impair our profitability, harm our reputation or otherwise adversely affect our business.



On February 2, 2016, we entered into consent orders with the CFPB and the U.S. Department of Justice relatedRefer to their previously disclosed investigation of, and allegations regarding, our discretionary dealer compensation practices. See Item 1. “Business – RegulatoryBusiness, “Regulatory Environment” for a descriptionfurther discussion of the terms of the consent orders, including, among other things, the changes we agreed to make to our dealer compensation practices. Compliance costsCFPB’s authority and the changes to our business practices required by the consent orders may adversely affect our future results of operations and financial condition, including our financing volume, market share, financing margins, and net earning assets.activities.

At the state level, state regulators are taking a more stringent approach to supervising and regulating financial products and services subject to their jurisdiction. For example, certain states have proposed rate cap bills that would put limits on the maximum rate of finance charges. We expect to continue to face greater supervisory scrutiny and enhanced supervisory requirements for the foreseeable future.  We have received a request for documents and information from the New York State Department of Financial Services relating to our lending practices (including fair lending), and a request for documents and information pursuant to a civil investigative demand from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General relating to our financing of GAP insurance products on retail contracts.  We are cooperating with these requests, but are unable to predict their outcome given their preliminary status.

Other Federal Regulation

The Dodd-Frank Act also established the FSOC, which is mandated with designating SIFIs.  An international standard-setting body, the FSB, also has proposed – but has not yet finalized – a methodology for assessing and designating non-bank non-insurer G-SIFIs.  If TMCC or one of its affiliates were designated as a SIFI or, once the FSB finalizes its process, a G-SIFI, we could experience increased compliance costs, the need to change our business practices, impairments to our profitability and competitiveness and other adverse effects on our business.

Under the Volcker Rule which was enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, companies affiliated with U.S. insured depository institutions are generally prohibited from engaging in “proprietary trading” and certain transactions with certain privately offered funds. Companies subject to the Volcker Rule were required to bring all of their activities and investments into conformance by July 21, 2015, subject to certain extensions. The activities prohibited by the Volcker Rule are not core activities for us. Accordingly, we do not believe the Volcker Rule and its implementing regulations are likely to have a material effect on our business or operations.  In the future, however,However, the federal financial regulatory agencies charged with implementing the Volcker Rule could further amend the rule or change their approach to administering, enforcing or interpreting the rule, which could negatively affect us and potentially require us to limit or change our activities or operations.

The Dodd-Frank Act also established aEnvironmental Related Regulation

Concern over climate change or other environmental matters may result in new framework for the regulation of certain OTC derivatives referred to as swapsor increased legal and security-based swaps.  The Dodd-Frank Act requires the CFTC to adopt certain rules and regulations governing swaps and the SEC to adopt certain rules and regulations governing security-based swaps.  While the CFTC has completed the majority of its regulations in this area, most of which are in effect, the SEC has not yet adopted a number of its security-based swap regulations.

The OTC derivatives provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act impose clearing, trading and margin requirements on certain contracts.  At present, we qualify for exceptions from these requirements for the swaps that we enter into to hedge our commercial risks.  However, if we were to fail to qualify for such exceptions, we could become subject to some or all of these requirements, which would increase our cost of entering into and maintaining such hedging positions.  Moreover, the application of the clearing, trading and marginregulatory requirements and new financial incentives regarding electrified vehicles intended to mitigate factors contributing to, or intended to address the potential impacts of, climate change or other environmental concerns. In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (the "Act") was signed into law. The Act modifies climate and clean energy corporate tax provisions, including, among other things, amendments to the federal tax credit for plug-in vehicles available under current tax law. Such regulations (including laws related regulations,to greenhouse gas emitting products or services) and government incentives may require us to alter our proposed business plans, lead to increased compliance costs and changes to our dealer counterparties may change the costoperations and availability of the OTC derivatives that we use for hedging.  

The full impact of the OTC derivatives provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and related regulatory requirements uponcould have an adverse effect on our business, will not be known until the regulations are fully implemented and the market for derivatives contracts has adjusted. The Dodd-Frank Act and regulations could significantly increase the cost of OTC derivative contracts, materially alter the terms of OTC derivative contracts, reduce the availability of OTC derivatives to protect against risks we encounter, or reduce our ability to monetize or restructure our existing OTC derivative contracts. If we reduce our use of OTC derivatives as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and resulting regulations, our results of operations may become more volatile and our cash flows may be less predictable, which could adversely affect our ability to plan for and fund capital expenditures.financial condition.

Refer to Item 1. “Business – RegulatoryBusiness, “Regulatory Environment” for additional information on our regulatory environment.


Adverse economic conditions or changes in state laws in states in which we have customer concentrations may negatively affect our operating results of operations and financial condition.

We are exposed to geographic customer concentration risk inon our retail, lease, dealer, and insurancevoluntary protection products in certain states. Factors adversely affecting the economyeconomies and applicable laws in variousthe states where we have concentration risk could have an adverse effect on our operating results of operations and financial condition.

Refer to Note 1 – SummaryBasis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information and disclosure about customer concentrations in certain states.

25


Table of Contents



ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVEDUNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

There are no unresolved SEC staff comments to report.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our finance and insurance headquarters operations are currently located in Torrance, California,Plano, Texas, and our facilities are leased from TMS.TMNA.

On April 28, 2014, we issued a press release announcing that our corporate headquarters will move from Torrance, California, to Plano, Texas, beginning in 2017 as part of TMC’s planned consolidation of its three separate North American headquarters for manufacturing, sales and marketing to a single new headquarters facility. We are currently leasing temporary offices in Plano, Texas in advance of the completion of construction of our new corporate headquarters.

FieldAdditional operations for both finance and insurancevoluntary protection products are located in three CSCs, three regional management offices, and 29 DSSOs in cities throughout the U.S.  Two of the DSSOs share premises with the regional CSCs.  All three of the regional management offices share premises with DSSO offices.Experience Centers. The Central region CSCExperience Center is locatedco-located with our headquarters in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and is leased from TMS.Plano, Texas. The Western region CSCRegion Experience Center is located in Chandler, Arizona. The Eastern region CSCExperience Center is located in Owings Mills, Maryland.Alpharetta, Georgia. Our dealer lending function is centralized at the Central region Experience Center. We also have a sales and operations office in Puerto Rico. All premises are occupied under lease.

We believe that our properties are suitable to meet the current requirements of our business. Refer to Item 1. Business, “General” for further discussion of the field operations restructuring.

VariousFor a discussion of legal actions, governmental proceedings, and other claims are pending or may be instituted or asserted in the future against us with respect to matters arising in the ordinary course of business.  Certain of these actions are or purport to be class action suits, seeking sizeable damages and/or changes in our business operations, policies and practices.  Certain of these actions are similar to suits that have been filed against other financial institutions and captive finance companies.  We perform periodic reviews of pending claims and actions to determine the probability of adverse verdicts and resulting amounts of liability.  We establish accruals for legal claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.  When we are able, we also determine estimates of reasonably possible loss or range of loss, whether in excess of any related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability. See see Note 149 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Given the inherent uncertainty associated with legal matters, the actual costs of resolving legal claimsStatements - Litigation and associated costs of defense may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts for which accruals have been established.  Based on available information and established accruals, we do not believe it is reasonably possible that the results of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.Governmental Proceedings.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


PART II


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

TMCC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TFSA,TFSIC, and accordingly, all shares of TMCC’s stock are owned by TFSA.TFSIC. There is no market for TMCC's stock.

In fiscal 2015 and 2014, TMCC declared and paid cash dividends to TFSA of $435 million and $665 million, respectively.  No dividends were declared and paid in fiscal 2016.



ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA[RESERVED]

26

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012¹

 

INCOME STATEMENT DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease

 

$

7,141

 

 

 

 

$

6,113

 

 

$

5,068

 

 

$

4,748

 

 

$

4,722

 

Retail

 

 

1,859

 

 

 

 

 

1,797

 

 

 

1,897

 

 

 

2,062

 

 

 

2,371

 

Dealer

 

 

403

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

432

 

 

 

434

 

 

 

365

 

Total financing revenues

 

 

9,403

 

 

 

 

 

8,310

 

 

 

7,397

 

 

 

7,244

 

 

 

7,458

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

5,914

 

 

 

 

 

4,857

 

 

 

4,012

 

 

 

3,568

 

 

 

3,368

 

Interest expense

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

 

 

736

 

 

 

1,340

 

 

 

940

 

 

 

1,300

 

Net financing revenues

 

 

2,352

 

 

 

 

 

2,717

 

 

 

2,045

 

 

 

2,736

 

 

 

2,790

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance earned premiums and contract revenues

 

 

719

 

 

 

 

 

638

 

 

 

567

 

 

 

571

 

 

 

604

 

Gain on sale of commercial finance business

 

 

197

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Investment and other income, net

 

 

164

 

 

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

113

 

Net financing revenues and other revenues

 

 

3,432

 

 

 

 

 

3,549

 

 

 

2,747

 

 

 

3,480

 

 

 

3,507

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

441

 

 

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

170

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

(98

)

Operating and administrative

 

 

1,161

 

 

 

 

 

1,046

 

 

 

965

 

 

 

911

 

 

 

857

 

Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses

 

 

318

 

 

 

 

 

269

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

293

 

 

 

325

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,920

 

 

 

 

 

1,623

 

 

 

1,393

 

 

 

1,325

 

 

 

1,084

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

1,512

 

 

 

 

 

1,926

 

 

 

1,354

 

 

 

2,155

 

 

 

2,423

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

580

 

 

 

 

 

729

 

 

 

497

 

 

 

824

 

 

 

937

 

Net income

 

$

932

 

 

 

 

$

1,197

 

 

$

857

 

 

$

1,331

 

 

$

1,486

 

1

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

 

 

March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

BALANCE SHEET DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables, net

 

$

65,636

 

 

$

65,893

 

 

$

65,176

 

 

$

62,567

 

 

$

58,042

 

Investments in operating leases, net

 

$

36,488

 

 

$

31,128

 

 

$

24,769

 

 

$

20,384

 

 

$

18,743

 

Total assets

 

$

114,723

 

 

$

109,625

 

 

$

102,740

 

 

$

95,302

 

 

$

88,913

 

Debt

 

$

93,725

 

 

$

90,231

 

 

$

85,367

 

 

$

78,832

 

 

$

73,234

 

Capital stock

 

$

915

 

 

$

915

 

 

$

915

 

 

$

915

 

 

$

915

 

Retained earnings

 

$

8,315

 

 

$

7,383

 

 

$

6,621

 

 

$

6,429

 

 

$

6,585

 

Total shareholder's equity

 

$

9,397

 

 

$

8,520

 

 

$

7,738

 

 

$

7,557

 

 

$

7,662

 

Our Board


Table of Directors declared and paid cash dividends of $435 million, $665 million, $1,487 million, and $741 million to TFSA during fiscal 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.  No dividends were declared or paid during fiscal 2016.Contents



 

 

As of and for the years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

KEY FINANCIAL DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

 

 

2.32

 

 

 

3.59

 

 

 

2.00

 

 

 

3.27

 

 

 

2.85

 

Debt to equity

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

10.6

 

 

 

11.0

 

 

 

10.4

 

 

 

9.6

 

Return on assets

 

 

0.83

%

 

 

1.13

%

 

 

0.87

%

 

 

1.45

%

 

 

1.65

%

Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of

   gross earning assets

 

 

0.52

%

 

 

0.50

%

 

 

0.50

%

 

 

0.63

%

 

 

0.80

%

Net charge-offs as a percentage of average

   gross earning assets

 

 

0.38

%

 

 

0.29

%

 

 

0.28

%

 

 

0.27

%

 

 

0.21

%

60 or more days past due as a percentage of

   gross earning assets

 

 

0.26

%

 

 

0.21

%

 

 

0.18

%

 

 

0.19

%

 

 

0.18

%


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K or incorporated by reference herein are “forward looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations and currently available information. However, since these statements are based on factors that involve risks and uncertainties, our performance and results may differ materially from those described or implied by such forward-looking statements. Words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “intend,” “will,” “may” or words or phrases of similar meaning are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution that the forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors such as the following that may cause actual results to differ materially from those stated:

·

Changes in general business, economic, and geopolitical conditions, as well as in consumer demand and the competitive environment in the automotive markets in the United States;

Changes in general business, economic, and geopolitical conditions, including trade policy, as well as in consumer demand and the competitive environment in the automotive markets in the United States;

·

A decline in TMS sales volume and the level of TMS sponsored subvention programs;

Changes in interest rates and credit spreads;

·

Recalls announced by TMS and the perceived quality of Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles;

A decline in TMNA or any private label sales volume and the level of TMNA or any private label sponsored subvention, cash, and contractual residual value support incentive programs;

·

Availability and cost of sources of financing;

Extreme weather conditions, natural disasters, changes in fuel prices, manufacturing disruptions and production suspensions of Toyota, Lexus, and private label vehicles and related parts supply;

·

Changes in our credit ratings and those of TMC;

Increased competition from other financial institutions seeking to increase their share of financing Toyota, Lexus, and private label vehicles;

·

Changes in our financial position and liquidity, or changes or disruptions in our funding sources or access to the global capital markets;

Changes in consumer behavior;

·

Revisions to the estimates and assumptions for our allowance for credit losses;

Recalls announced by TMNA or private label companies and the perceived quality of Toyota, Lexus, and any private label vehicles;

·

Revisions to the estimates and assumptions that are used to determine the value of certain assets;

Risks related to health epidemics and other outbreaks;

·

Fluctuations in the value of our investment securities or market prices;

Availability and cost of financing;

·

Changes to existing, or adoption of new, accounting standards;

Failure or interruption in our operations, including our communications and information systems, or as a result of our failure to retain existing or to attract new key personnel;

·

Changes in prices of used vehicles and their effect on residual values of our off-lease vehicles and return rates;

Increased cost, credit and operating risk exposure, or our failure to realize the anticipated benefits from our private label financial services to third-party automotive and mobility companies, including Mazda and Bass Pro Shops;

·

Failure of our customers or dealers to meet the terms of any contract with us, or otherwise perform as agreed;

Changes in our credit ratings and those of our ultimate parent, TMC and changes in our credit support arrangements;

·

Fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates;

Changes in our financial position and liquidity, or changes or disruptions in our funding sources or access to the global capital markets;

·

Failure or interruption in our operations, including our communications and information systems, as a result of a security breach, cyber-attack, natural disaster or other reason;

Revisions to the estimates and assumptions for our allowance for credit losses;

·

Challenges related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters to Plano, Texas;

Flaws in the design, implementation and use of quantitative models and revisions to the estimates and assumptions that are used to determine the value of certain assets;

·

Failure or changes in commercial soundness of our counterparties and other financial institutions;

Fluctuations in the value or market prices of our investment securities;

·

Increased competition from other financial institutions seeking to increase their share of financing Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles;

Changes in prices of used vehicles and their effect on residual values of our off-lease vehicles and return rates;

·

Insufficient establishment of reserves, or the failure of a reinsurer to meet its obligations, in our insurance operations;

Failure of our customers or dealers to meet the terms of any contract with us, or otherwise perform as agreed;

·

Compliance with current laws and regulations or becoming subject to more stringent laws, regulatory requirements and regulatory scrutiny;

Market risks including changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates and market prices;

·

Changes in our business practices required by new regulatory requirements, such as those required by the consent orders we entered into with the CFPB and the United States Department of Justice;

Failure or changes in commercial soundness of our counterparties and other financial institutions;

·

Natural disasters, changes in fuel prices, manufacturing disruptions and production suspensions of Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicle models and related parts supply;

Insufficient establishment of reserves, or the failure of a reinsurer to meet its obligations, in our voluntary protectionoperations;

27


Table of Contents

A security breach or a cyber-attack;

·

Changes in the economy or to laws in states where we have a high concentration of customers;

Failure to maintain compliant enterprise data practices, including the collection, use, sharing, and security of personally identifiable and financial information of our customers and employees;
Compliance with current laws and regulations or becoming subject to more stringent laws, regulatory requirements and regulatory scrutiny;
Changes in the economies and applicable laws in the states where we have concentration risk; and
Other risks and uncertainties set forth in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.


·

Changes in business strategy, including expansion of product lines, credit risk appetite, and business acquisitions; and

·

The other risks and uncertainties set forth in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors”.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We will not update the forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking statements.

28


Table of Contents

OVERVIEW


OVERVIEW

Key Performance Indicators and Factors Affecting Our Business

In our finance operations, we generate revenue, income, and cash flows by providing retail, lease, and dealer financing to dealers and their customers. We measure the performance of our financingfinance operations using the following metrics: financing volume, market share, financial leverage,Net financing margins, operatingrevenues, Operating and administrative expense, residual value and credit loss metrics.

In our insurancevoluntary protection operations, we generate revenue primarily through marketing, underwriting, and providing claims administration for products that cover certain risks of dealers and their customers. We measure the performance of our insurancevoluntary protection operations using the following metrics: issued agreementcontract volume, average number of agreementscontracts in force, loss metrics and investment income.

Our financial results are affected by a variety of economic and industry factors including, but not limited to, new and used vehicle markets, Toyota, Lexus, and Scion sales volume,private label new vehicle incentives,production volume, vehicle inventory levels, vehicle sales and incentive programs, consumer behavior, employment levels, our ability to respond to changes in interest rates with respect to both contract pricing and funding, the actual or perceived quality, safety or reliability of Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicles, the financial health of the dealers we finance, and competitive pressure. Our financial results may also be affected by the regulatory environment in which we operate, including as a result of new legislation or changes in regulation and any compliance costs andor changes we may be required to make to our business practices required by the consent orders we entered into in February 2016 with respect to our discretionary dealer compensation practices. All of these factors can influence consumer contract and dealer financing volume, the number of consumer contracts and dealers that default and the loss per occurrence, our inability to realize originally estimated contractual residual values on leased vehicles, the volume and performance of our insurancevoluntary protection operations, and our gross marginsNet financing revenues on consumer contract and dealer financing volume. Changes in the volume of vehicle sales, utilizationsales of our insurance programs,voluntary protection products, or the level of coverage purchased by affiliatesvoluntary protection expenses and insurance losses could materially and adversely impact our insurancevoluntary protection operations. Additionally, our funding programs and related costs are influenced by changes in the global capital markets, prevailing interest rates, and our credit ratings and those of our parent companies, which may affect our ability to obtain cost effective funding to support earning asset growth.

Our primary competitors are other financial institutions including national and regional commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, independent insurance servicevoluntary protection product contract providers, online banks, finance companies, alternative financing sources and, to a lesser extent, other automobile manufacturers’ affiliated finance companies that actively seek to purchase consumer contracts through Toyota, Lexus, and Lexus independent dealerships (“dealerships”).private label dealers. We strive to achieve the following:

Exceptional Customer Service: Our relationship with Toyota, Lexus, and Lexusprivate label dealers and their customers offeroffers us a competitive advantage. We seek to leverage this opportunity by providing exceptional service to the dealers and their customers. Through our DSSO network,Experience Centers, we work closely with the dealers to improve the quality of service we provide to them. We also focus on assisting the dealers with the quality of their customer service operations to enhance customer loyalty for the dealershipdealers and the Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label brands. By providing consistent and reliable support, training, and resources to our dealer network, we continue to develop and improve our dealer relationships. In addition to marketing programs targeted toward customer retention, we work closely with TMSTMNA, private label companies, and other third partythird-party distributors to offer special retail, lease, dealer financing, and insurance programs.voluntary protection products. We also focus on providing a positive customer experience to existing retail, lease, and insurancevoluntary protection product customers through our CSCs.Experience Centers.

Risk-Based Origination and Pricing: We price and structure our retail and lease contracts to compensate us for the credit risk we assume. The objective of this strategy is to maximize operating results and better match contract rates across a broad range of risk levels. To achieve this objective, we evaluate our existing portfolio for key opportunities to expand volume in targeted markets. We deliver timely strategic information to the dealers to assist them in benefiting from market opportunities. We continuously strive to refine our strategy and methodology for risk-based pricing.

Liquidity: Our liquidity strategy is to maintain the capacity to fund assets and repay liabilities in a timely and cost-effective manner even in adverse market conditions. This capacity is primarily driven by our ability to raise funds in the global capital markets and through loans, credit facilities, and other transactions, as well as our ability to generate liquidity from our earnings assets. Our pursuit of this strategy has led us to develop a diversified borrowing base that is distributed across a variety of markets, geographies, investors, and financing structures, among other factors.


29


Table of Contents


Fiscal 20162023 Operating Environment

During the fiscal 2016, slowyear ending March 31, 2023 (“fiscal 2023”), the U.S. economy was impacted by uncertainties related to inflationary pressures, higher interest rates, banking industry disruptions, the ongoing effects of the global coronavirus and related variants (“COVID-19”) pandemic, and the conflict in Ukraine. The economic growthconditions, including consumer price increases and higher interest rates, have negatively impacted some consumers ability to make scheduled payments which has resulted in an increase in consumer delinquencies and charge-offs. The ongoing challenging economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical conflicts, including production constraints due to supply shortages affecting the automotive industry, such as the ongoing shortage of semiconductor chips, and additional delays affecting the supply chain and logistics networks, have continued to limit the inventory levels of new vehicles. The new vehicle inventory constraints have resulted in decreases in industry-wide vehicle sales incentives in the U.S. continued, as employmentin fiscal 2023, compared to fiscal 2022.

While average used vehicle values in fiscal 2023 remained elevated compared to pre-pandemic levels, primarily due to the new vehicle inventory constraints, there has been a decline in values in the current fiscal year. Future declines in used vehicle values resulting from increases in the supply of new and used vehicles and increases in new vehicle sales incentives could unfavorably impact return rates, improved, consumer spending increased,residual values, depreciation expense and the housing market remained strong.  While the overall U.S. economy has continued to show positive trends duringcredit losses.

During fiscal 2016, consumer debt levels also continued to rise as consumers experienced greater access to credit.

Conditions in2023, the global capital markets experienced periods of heightened volatility duringin response to the second half of fiscal 2016 due to continued concerns regarding global economic growth as well asongoing conflict in Ukraine, increases in the inflation rate, uncertainty regarding the future path of U.S. monetary policy. Additionally, oil prices fluctuatedpolicy, and instability in the global banking sector. U.S. benchmark interest rates and credit spreads both increased during the second half of fiscal 2016.  We2023. While we continue to maintain broad global access to both domestic and international markets.markets, these events could lead to further disruptions in the capital markets and increases in our funding costs. Future changes in interest rates in the U.S. and foreign markets could result in volatility in our interest expense, which could affect our results of operations.

Industry-wide vehicle sales in the United States increased, and sales incentives throughout the auto industry remained elevated during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015.  Vehicle sales by TMS increased 2 percent in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015.  The increase in TMS sales was attributable to the continued increase in consumer demand for new vehicles. In addition, lease volume increased and retail volume decreased in fiscal 2016 due primarily to a higher focus by TMS on lease subvention.  Our overall market share remained relatively consistent for fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015.30


Table of Contents

Used vehicle values remained strong during fiscal 2016 but deteriorated slightly compared to fiscal 2015.  However, it remains uncertain whether the used vehicle market will continue to be as strong as it has been in the past few years.  In the latter part of fiscal 2016, used vehicle inventory levels increased which could unfavorably impact used vehicle values in future periods.  Declines in used vehicle values and a higher proportion of lease volume as compared to retail volume could affect return rates, depreciation expense and credit losses.



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance operations 1

 

$

1,041

 

 

$

2,416

 

 

$

1,606

 

Voluntary protection operations 1

 

 

(62

)

 

 

119

 

 

 

411

 

Total net income

 

$

979

 

 

$

2,535

 

 

$

2,017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance operations1

 

$

797

 

 

$

1,038

 

 

$

743

 

Insurance operations1

 

 

135

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

114

 

Total net income

 

$

932

 

 

$

1,197

 

 

$

857

 

1.
Refer to Note 14 – Segment Informationof the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement for the total asset balances of our finance operations and voluntary protection operations.

1

Refer to Note 16 – Segment Information of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement for the total asset balances of our finance and insurance operations.

Fiscal 20162023 Compared to Fiscal 20152022

Our consolidated net income was $932$979 million in fiscal 2016,2023, compared to $1,197 million$2.5 billion in fiscal 2015.2022. The decrease in net income duringfor fiscal 20162023 compared to fiscal 2022 was primarily due to a $1,057$1.7 billion increase in interest expense, a $627 million decrease in total financing revenues, a $477 million increase in provision for credit losses, and a $79 million increase in operating and administrative expense, partially offset by a $724 million decrease in depreciation on operating leases, a $401$460 million decrease in provision for income taxes, and a $123 million increase in investment and other income, net.

Our overall capital position decreased $1.6 billion, taking into account a $2.5 billion dividend in February 2023 to TFSIC, bringing total shareholder’s equity to $16.5 billion at March 31, 2023, as compared to $18.1 billion at March 31, 2022. Our debt increased to $111.7 billion at March 31, 2023 from $109.2 billion at March 31, 2022. Our debt-to-equity ratio increased to 6.8 at March 31, 2023 from 6.0 at March 31, 2022.

Fiscal 2022 Compared to Fiscal 2021

Our consolidated net income was $2.5 billion in fiscal 2022, compared to $2.0 billion in fiscal 2021. The increase in net income for fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 was primarily due to a $901 million decrease in interest expense, primarily driven by lower gains on derivatives, a $133$190 million increasedecrease in the provision for credit losses, a $121 million increase in total financing revenues, an $86 million decrease in depreciation on operating leases, partially offset by a $436 million decrease in investment and other income, net, a $115$210 million increase in operating and administrative expenses. These decreases in net income were partially offset byexpense, and a $1,093$157 million increase in total financing revenues primarily driven by an increase in operating lease revenues, a $197 million gain on sale of the commercial finance business and a $149 million decrease in the provision for income taxes.

On October 1, 2015, we completed the sale of certain assets and liabilities related to our industrial equipment retail, lease and dealer portfolios (the “commercial finance business”) to Toyota Industries Commercial Finance, Inc. (“TICF”), a newly-formed subsidiary of Toyota Industries Corporation, which forms part of the group of companies known as the Toyota Group and is a related party to TMCC.  The sale resulted in cash proceeds of $2.3 billion, which are expected to be utilized for general corporate purposes, including the purchase of retail and lease contracts and the payment of debt.  The transaction resulted in a gain of $197 million that is reflected in our results of operations in fiscal 2016.  We do not expect the sale of the commercial finance business to have a material impact on our revenue in the future.

On February 2, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), we reached a settlement with the CFPB and the U.S. Department of Justice (the “Agencies”) related to the Agencies’ previously disclosed investigation of, and allegations regarding, our discretionary dealer compensation practices.  We entered into a consent order with each of the agencies to reflect this settlement. Pursuant to the consent orders, we agreed to implement a new dealer compensation policy within 180 days of the Effective Date, which includes, among other things, decreased limits on dealer participation caps of 125 basis points (1.25 percent) for contracts with terms of 60 months or less and 100 basis points (1.00 percent) for contracts with longer terms. Additionally, we agreed to pay an amount in consumer restitution that is not material to our financial condition or results of operations for fiscal 2016 and within the amount we had previously recorded as a loss contingency.  Compliance costs and the changes to our business practices required by the consent orders may adversely affect our future results of operations and financial condition, including our financing volume, market share, financing margins, and net earning assets.

Our overall capital position increased $0.9$2.5 billion, bringing total shareholder’sshareholder's equity to $9.4$18.1 billion at March 31, 2016,2022, as compared to $8.5$15.6 billion at March 31, 2015.2021. Our debt increaseddecreased to $93.7$109.2 billion at March 31, 20162022 from $90.2$109.7 billion at March 31, 2015.2021. Our debt-to-equity ratio decreased to 10.06.0 at March 31, 20162022 from 10.67.0 at March 31, 2015.2021.


31


Table of Contents


Fiscal 2015 Compared to Fiscal 2014

Our consolidated net income was $1,197 million in fiscal 2015, compared to $857 million in fiscal 2014.  Our consolidated net income for fiscal 2015 increased as compared to fiscal 2014 primarily due to an increase of $913 million in financing revenues and a decrease of $604 million in our interest expense primarily driven by gains on derivatives, as compared to losses in the prior year.  This was partially offset by a $845 million increase in depreciation on operating leases, a $232 million increase in the provision for income taxes and a $138 million increase in the provision for credit losses.

Our overall capital position, taking into account the payment of a $435 million dividend in September 2014 to TFSA, increased by $782 million, bringing total shareholder’s equity to $8.5 billion at March 31, 2015, as compared to $7.7 billion at March 31, 2014.  Our debt increased to $90.2 billion at March 31, 2015 from $85.4 billion at March 31, 2014.  Our debt-to-equity ratio decreased to 10.6 at March 31, 2015 from 11.0 at March 31, 2014.



Finance Operations

The following table summarizes key results of our Finance Operations:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 to

 

 

2015 to

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

Financing revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease

 

$

7,141

 

 

$

6,113

 

 

$

5,068

 

 

 

17

%

 

 

21

%

 

Retail1

 

 

1,859

 

 

 

1,797

 

 

 

1,897

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

(5

)%

 

Dealer

 

 

403

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

406

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

(1

)%

 

Total financing revenues

 

 

9,403

 

 

 

8,310

 

 

 

7,371

 

 

 

13

%

 

 

13

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment and other income, net

 

 

99

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

(9

)%

 

Gain on sale of commercial finance business

 

 

197

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

-

%

 

Gross revenues from finance operations

 

 

9,699

 

 

 

8,399

 

 

 

7,469

 

 

 

15

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

5,914

 

 

 

4,857

 

 

 

4,012

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

21

%

 

Interest expense

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

736

 

 

 

1,340

 

 

 

54

%

 

 

(45

)%

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

441

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

170

 

 

 

43

%

 

 

81

%

 

Operating and administrative expenses

 

 

909

 

 

 

825

 

 

 

767

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

8

%

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

501

 

 

 

635

 

 

 

437

 

 

 

(21

)%

 

 

45

%

 

Net income from finance operations

 

$

797

 

 

$

1,038

 

 

$

743

 

 

 

(23

)%

 

 

40

%

 

1

Includes direct finance lease revenues.

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage change

(Dollars in millions)

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2023 to 2022

 

2022 to 2021

Financing revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease

 

$

7,063

 

 

$

8,337

 

 

$

8,481

 

 

(15)%

 

(2)%

Retail

 

 

3,737

 

 

 

3,254

 

 

 

2,905

 

 

15%

 

12%

Dealer

 

 

493

 

 

 

329

 

 

 

413

 

 

50%

 

(20)%

Total financing revenues

 

 

11,293

 

 

 

11,920

 

 

 

11,799

 

 

(5)%

 

1%

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

5,122

 

 

 

5,846

 

 

 

5,932

 

 

(12)%

 

(1)%

Interest expense

 

 

3,054

 

 

 

1,401

 

 

 

2,302

 

 

118%

 

(39)%

Net financing revenues

 

 

3,117

 

 

 

4,673

 

 

 

3,565

 

 

(33)%

 

31%

Investment and other income, net

 

 

314

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

93

 

 

598%

 

(52)%

Net financing and other revenues

 

 

3,431

 

 

 

4,718

 

 

 

3,658

 

 

(27)%

 

29%

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

713

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

426

 

 

202%

 

(45)%

Operating and administrative

 

 

1,331

 

 

 

1,311

 

 

 

1,124

 

 

2%

 

17%

Total expenses

 

 

2,044

 

 

 

1,547

 

 

 

1,550

 

 

32%

 

0%

Income before income taxes

 

 

1,387

 

 

 

3,171

 

 

 

2,108

 

 

(56)%

 

50%

Provision for income taxes

 

 

346

 

 

 

755

 

 

 

502

 

 

(54)%

 

50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income from finance operations

 

$

1,041

 

 

$

2,416

 

 

$

1,606

 

 

(57)%

 

50%

Our finance operations reported net income of $797 million$1.0 billion and $1,038 million$2.4 billion during fiscal 20162023 and 2015,2022, respectively. The decrease in net income duringfrom finance operations for fiscal 20162023 compared to fiscal 2022 was primarily due to a $1,057$1.7 billion increase in interest expense, a $627 million decrease in total financing revenues, and a $477 million increase in provision for credit losses, partially offset by a $724 million decrease in depreciation on operating leases, a $401 million increase in interest expense, a $133 million increase in the provision for credit losses and an $84 million increase in operating and administrative expenses, partially offset by a $1,093 million increase in total financing revenues primarily driven by an increase in operating lease revenues, a $197 million gain on sale of the commercial finance business and a $134$409 million decrease in provision for income taxes.taxes, and a $269 million increase in investment and other income, net.

Financing Revenues

Total financing revenues increased 13decreased 5 percent during fiscal 20162023 compared to fiscal 20152022 due to the following:

·

Operating lease revenues increased 17 percent in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015, primarily due to higher average outstanding earning asset balances, partially offset by lower portfolio yields.

Operating lease revenues decreased 15 percent in fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, due to lower average outstanding earning asset balances and lower portfolio yields.

·

Retail contract revenues increased 3

Retail financing revenues increased 15 percent in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015, primarily due to an increase in fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, due to higher average outstanding earning asset balances and higher portfolio yields.
Dealer financing revenues increased 50 percent in fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022, due to higher portfolio yields and higher average outstanding earning asset balances.

As a result of the above, our average portfolio yields as well as higher average outstanding earning asset balances.

·

Dealer financing revenues remained relatively unchanged in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015, primarily due to an increase in our portfolio yields, offset by lower average outstanding earning asset balances.

Our total portfolio yield, which includes operating lease, retail and dealer financing revenues, decreasedincreased to 3.55.1 percent for fiscal 2023, compared to 5.0 percent for fiscal 2022.

Depreciation on Operating Leases

We recorded depreciation on operating leases of $5.1 billion during fiscal 20162023 compared to 3.7 percent in$5.8 billion during fiscal 2015,2022. The decrease is primarily due to decreases in our operating lease portfolio yield as a result of higher yielding assets being replaced by lower yielding assets.

Depreciation on Operating Leases

Depreciation on operating leases increased 22 percent during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015.  The increase in depreciation was primarily attributable to an increase in average operating lease units outstanding during fiscal 2016 as comparedoutstanding. The ongoing challenging economic conditions have resulted in a decrease in the availability of new vehicles from pre-pandemic levels. The new vehicle inventory constraints and higher off-lease vehicle purchases by consumers and dealers have led to fiscal 2015.historically high levels of average used vehicle values. Declines in used vehicle values resulting from increases in the supply of new vehicles and increases in new vehicle sales incentives could unfavorably impact return rates, residual values, and depreciation expense in the future.

32


Table of Contents



Interest Expense

Our liabilities consist mainly of fixed and floatingvariable rate debt, denominated in U.S. dollars and various other currencies, which we issue in the global capital markets, while our assets consist primarily of U.S. dollar denominated, fixed rate receivables. We enter into interest rate swaps interest rate floors, interest rate caps and foreign currency swaps to economically hedge the interest rate and foreign currency risks that result from the different characteristics of our assets and liabilities. The following table summarizes the consolidated components of interest expense:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Interest expense on debt

 

$

1,308

 

 

$

1,213

 

 

$

1,262

 

Interest income on derivatives

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(67

)

 

 

(77

)

Interest expense on debt and derivatives

 

 

1,301

 

 

 

1,146

 

 

 

1,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ineffectiveness related to hedge accounting derivatives

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(3

)

Loss (gain) on non-hedge accounting foreign currency transactions

 

 

503

 

 

 

(2,375

)

 

 

(45

)

(Gain) loss on non-hedge accounting foreign currency swaps

 

 

(573

)

 

 

2,248

 

 

 

185

 

(Gain) loss on non-hedge accounting interest rate swaps

 

 

(92

)

 

 

(282

)

 

 

18

 

Total interest expense

 

$

1,137

 

 

$

736

 

 

$

1,340

 

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Interest expense on debt

 

$

2,919

 

 

$

1,498

 

 

$

1,954

 

Interest (income) expense on derivatives

 

 

(569

)

 

 

107

 

 

 

420

 

Interest expense on debt and derivatives

 

 

2,350

 

 

 

1,605

 

 

 

2,374

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Gains) losses on debt denominated in foreign currencies

 

 

(614

)

 

 

(438

)

 

 

1,402

 

Losses (gains) on foreign currency swaps

 

 

805

 

 

 

818

 

 

 

(1,351

)

Losses (gains) on U.S. dollar interest rate swaps

 

 

513

 

 

 

(584

)

 

 

(123

)

Total interest expense

 

$

3,054

 

 

$

1,401

 

 

$

2,302

 

During fiscal 2016,2023, total interest expense increased to $1,137 million$3.1 billion from $736 million during$1.4 billion in fiscal 2015. Total2022. The increase in total interest expense increasedis primarily attributable to an increase in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 due primarily to higher interest expense on debt, and derivatives and lower gainslosses on our non-hedge accountingU.S. dollar interest rate swaps.  swaps, partially offset by interest income on derivatives.

Interest expense on debt and derivatives increased as debt balances increased and interest rates rose during fiscal 2016.  Additionally, we recognized lower gains on non-hedge accounting foreign currency transactions, net of losses on the non-hedge accounting foreign currency swaps. These net gains resulted from a decrease in foreign currency and U.S. dollar swap rates.   During fiscal 2015, significant decreases in longer term U.S. dollar and foreign currency swap rates resulted in higher gains on non-hedge accounting interest rate swaps and foreign currency swaps, net of the associated foreign currency transactions.

Interest expense on debt primarily represents contractual net interest settlements and changes in accruals on secured and unsecured notes and loans payable and commercial paper,derivatives, and includes amortization of discountdiscounts, premiums, and premium, debt issuance costs, and basis adjustments.costs. During fiscal 2016,2023, interest expense on debt and derivatives increased to $1,308 million$2.4 billion from $1,213 million during$1.6 billion in fiscal 2015 as a result of higher2022. The increase in interest expense on debt balances coupled withis due to an increase in the weighted average interest rate.

Interestrates. The decrease in interest expense on derivatives represents netis primarily due to a decrease in interest settlements and changesexpense on pay-fixed swaps, partially offset by an increase in accrualsinterest expense on both hedge and non-hedge accounting interest rate andpay-float swaps.

Gains or losses on debt denominated in foreign currency derivatives.  During fiscal 2016, we recorded interest income on derivativescurrencies represent the impact of $7 million compared to interest income on derivatives of $67 million during fiscal 2015.

Gain or loss on non-hedge accounting foreign currency transactions represents the revaluation of foreign currency denominated debt transactions for which hedge accounting has not been elected.translation adjustments. We use non-hedge accounting foreign currency swaps to economically hedge thesethe debt denominated in foreign currency transactions.currencies. During fiscal 2016, the net gains of $70 million on our foreign currency transactions, net of foreign currency swaps, resulted from a decrease in foreign currency swap rates.  During2023 and fiscal 2015,2022, we recorded net gainslosses of $127$191 million on foreign currency transactions, net of foreign currency swaps, resulting from a more significant decreaseand $380 million, respectively, primarily due to increases in foreign currency swap rates relative to fiscal 2016.across the various currencies in which our debt is denominated.

We recorded a gain of $92 millionGains or losses on non-hedge accountingU.S. dollar interest rate swaps duringrepresent the change in the valuation of interest rate swaps. During fiscal 2016 as a result2023, we recorded losses of decreases in longer term$513 million, primarily due to net interest income becoming realized on our pay-fixed swaps partially offset by an upward shift of U.S. dollar swap rates which had a favorable impactresulting in gains on pay-fixed swaps exceeding losses on our pay floatpay-float swaps. WeDuring fiscal 2022, we recorded a gaingains of $282$584 million, on non-hedge accounting interest rate swaps during fiscal 2015 as a result of larger decreasesprimarily due to increases in longer term U.S. dollar swap rates relative to the decreases in swap rates in fiscal 2016.and net interest income on our pay-fixed swaps exceeding losses on our pay-float swaps.

Future changes in interest and foreign currency exchange rates could continue to result in significant volatility in our interest expense, thereby affecting our results of operations.


33


Table of Contents

Investment and Other Income, Net


We recorded investment and other income, net of $314 million for fiscal 2023, compared to $45 million for fiscal 2022. The increase in investment and other income, net for fiscal 2023 compared to fiscal 2022 was primarily due to higher yields on our investment in marketable securities portfolio.

Provision for Credit Losses

We recorded a provision for credit losses of $441$713 million for fiscal 2016,2023, compared to $308$236 million for fiscal 2015.2022. The economic conditions have resulted in an increase in consumer delinquencies and charge-offs as well as higher expectations of credit losses in the retail loan portfolio. These factors combined with the increase in size of our retail loan portfolio have led to an increase in the provision for credit losses for fiscal 2016 was due2023 compared to higher default frequency and loss severity, and overall portfolio growth primarily in the lease portfolio.fiscal 2022.

Operating and Administrative Expenses

OperatingWe recorded operating and administrative expenses increased 11 percent duringof $1.3 billion for each of fiscal 2016 compared to2023 and fiscal 2015 primarily reflecting2022. During fiscal 2023, increases in technology expenses and employee andexpenses were offset by a decrease in general operating expenses and certain expenses associated with the planned relocationexpenses.

34


Table of our headquarters to Plano, Texas.  We expect to incur additional expenses over the next several years relating to our planned relocation.Contents

Voluntary Protection Operations



Insurance Operations

The following table summarizes key results of our InsuranceVoluntary Protection Operations:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014¹

 

 

2016 to 2015

 

 

2015 to 2014

 

 

Agreements (units in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued

 

 

2,215

 

 

 

1,940

 

 

 

1,696

 

 

 

14

%

 

 

14

%

 

Average in force

 

 

6,464

 

 

 

5,859

 

 

 

5,527

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance earned premiums and contract revenues

 

$

719

 

 

$

638

 

 

$

593

 

 

 

13

%

 

 

8

%

 

Investment and other income, net

 

 

65

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

(38

)%

 

 

184

%

 

Revenues from insurance operations

 

 

784

 

 

 

743

 

 

 

630

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses

 

 

318

 

 

 

269

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

18

%

 

 

4

%

 

Operating and administrative expenses

 

 

252

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

198

 

 

 

14

%

 

 

12

%

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

79

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

(16

)%

 

 

57

%

 

Net income from insurance operations

 

$

135

 

 

$

159

 

 

$

114

 

 

 

(15

)%

 

 

39

%

 

1

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2023 to 2022

 

2022 to 2021

Contracts (units in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued

 

 

2,998

 

 

 

3,020

 

 

 

2,604

 

 

(1)%

 

16%

Average in force

 

 

10,292

 

 

 

9,989

 

 

 

9,525

 

 

3%

 

5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voluntary protection contract revenues
    and insurance earned premiums

 

$

1,053

 

 

$

1,015

 

 

$

956

 

 

4%

 

6%

Investment and other (loss) income, net

 

 

(217

)

 

 

(71

)

 

 

317

 

 

206%

 

(122)%

Revenues from voluntary protection operations

 

 

836

 

 

 

944

 

 

 

1,273

 

 

(11)%

 

(26)%

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voluntary protection contract expenses
  and insurance losses

 

 

470

 

 

 

405

 

 

 

369

 

 

16%

 

10%

Operating and administrative

 

 

445

 

 

 

386

 

 

 

363

 

 

15%

 

6%

Total expenses

 

 

915

 

 

 

791

 

 

 

732

 

 

16%

 

8%

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

 

(79

)

 

 

153

 

 

 

541

 

 

(152)%

 

(72)%

(Benefit) provision for income taxes

 

 

(17

)

 

 

34

 

 

 

130

 

 

(150)%

 

(74)%

Net (loss) income from voluntary protection operations

 

$

(62

)

 

$

119

 

 

$

411

 

 

(152)%

 

(71)%

Our insurancevoluntary protection operations reported a net loss of $62 million for fiscal 2023, compared to net income of $135$119 million for fiscal 2016 compared to $159 million for fiscal 2015.2022. The decrease in net income from voluntary protection operations for fiscal 20162023, compared to fiscal 20152022 was primarily due to a $49$146 million increase in insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses, a $40 million decrease in investment and other income,loss, net, a $65 million increase in voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses, and a $31$59 million increase in operating and administrative expenses.  These decreases in net income wereexpenses, partially offset by an $81a $51 million decrease in provision for income taxes and a $38 million increase in insurance earned premiums andvoluntary protection contract revenues and a $15 million decrease in the provision for income taxes.insurance earned premiums.

AgreementsContracts issued increased 14 percentwere relatively consistent during fiscal 20162023 compared to fiscal 2015.2022. The average number of contracts in force agreements increased 103 percent during fiscal 20162023 compared to fiscal 2015.  The increases2022, due to net growth in the issued and the averagevoluntary protection portfolio compared to prior years, primarily in force agreements were primarily due to increased sales of prepaid maintenance, contracts,vehicle service, and tire and wheel protection agreements and guaranteed auto protection agreements.  The increase in prepaid maintenance agreements was primarily due to the continued sales growth of product offerings introduced in fiscal 2014.   The volume of issued and average in force tire and wheel protection agreements has increased as the product continues to mature.  The volume of issued and average in force guaranteed auto protection agreements has increased due to increased sales effectiveness.contracts.

Revenue from InsuranceVoluntary Protection Operations

Our insurancevoluntary protection operations reported voluntary protection contract revenues and insurance earned premiums andof $1.1 billion for fiscal 2023 compared to $1.0 billion for fiscal 2022. Voluntary protection contract revenues of $719 million for fiscal 2016 compared to $638 million for fiscal 2015.  Insuranceand insurance earned premiums and contract revenues represent revenues from in force agreements,contracts and are affected by sales volumeissuances as well as the level, age, and mix of in force agreements.  Insurancecontracts. Voluntary protection contract revenues and insurance earned premiums and contract revenues are recognized over the term of the agreementscontracts in relation to the timing and level of anticipated claims and administrative expenses.claims. The increase in voluntary protection contract revenues and insurance earned premiums in fiscal 20162023 compared to fiscal 20152022 was primarily due to an increase in theour average in force agreements.contracts resulting from net growth in the voluntary protection portfolio from prior years.

Investment and Other (Loss) Income, Net

Our insurancevoluntary protection operations reported investment and other income,loss, net of $65$217 million for fiscal 2016,2023, compared to $105investment and other loss, net of $71 million for fiscal 2015.2022. Investment and other (loss) income, net consists primarily of dividend and interest income, realized gains and losses on investments in marketable securities, changes in fair value from equity and other-than-temporary impairmentavailable-for-sale debt securities for which the fair value option was elected, and credit loss expense on available-for-sale debt securities, if any. The decreaseincrease in investment and other income,loss, net in fiscal 2016 as2023, compared to fiscal 20152022, was primarily due to an increasehigher losses from the changes in fair value on our equity investments and sales of $50 million of other-than-temporary impairmentequity and a $14 million decrease in net realized gains,available-for-sale debt securities, partially offset by a $22 million increase inincreased dividend income. The impairments recognized in fiscal 2016 resulted primarily fromand interest rate volatility on our fixed income mutual funds.due to higher interest rates.

35



Table of Contents

Voluntary Protection Contract Expenses and Insurance Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

Our insurancevoluntary protection operations reported voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses of $318$470 million for fiscal 2016,2023, compared to $269$405 million for fiscal 2015.  Insurance2022. Voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred are a function of the amount of covered risks, the frequency and severity of claims associated with in force agreementscontracts and the level of risk retained by our voluntary protection operations. Voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance operations.  Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses include amounts paid and accrued for reported losses, estimates of losses incurred but not reported, and any related claim adjustment expenses. The increase in voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses in fiscal 2016 as2023 compared to fiscal 20152022 was primarily due to an increase in the numberfrequency of claims in our prepaid maintenance claimscontracts, as a result of a higher number of average in force agreements andwell as an increase in thefrequency and severity of prepaid maintenance claims.claims in our vehicle service and tire and wheel contracts. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in frequency and severity of claims in guaranteed auto protection contracts.

Operating and Administrative Expenses

Our insurancevoluntary protection operations reported operating and administrative expenses of $252$445 million for fiscal 2016,2023, compared to $221$386 million for fiscal 2015.2022. The increase in operating and administrative expenses in fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022 was attributable to higher general operating expenses and higher product expenses driven by the continued growth of our insurance business, insurance dealer back-end program expenses and general operating expenses. Insurance dealer back-end program expenses are incentives or expense reduction programs we provide to dealers based on certain performance criteria.voluntary protection product business.

Provision for Income Taxes

We recorded a provision for income taxes of $329 million for fiscal 2023, compared to $789 million for fiscal 2022. Our overalleffective tax rate for fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2022 was 25 percent and 24 percent, respectively. The decrease in the provision for income taxes for fiscal 2016 was $580 million2023, compared to $729 million for fiscal 2015.  Our effective tax rate2022, was 38.4 percent and 37.9 percent for fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.primarily due to a decrease in income before income taxes. The increase in ourhigher effective tax rate for fiscal 20162023 compared to fiscal 2015 is due2022 was primarily attributable to a the increase in state tax provision and the decrease in benefits from federal plug-in electric vehicle and fuel cell credits.credits in the current period.

36


Table of Contents


FINANCIAL CONDITION

Vehicle Financing Volume and Net Earning Assets

The composition of our vehicle contract volume and market share is summarized below:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage change

(units in thousands):

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2023 to 2022

 

2022 to 2021

Vehicle financing volume 1:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New retail contracts

 

 

718

 

 

 

697

 

 

 

748

 

 

3%

 

(7)%

Used retail contracts

 

 

406

 

 

 

466

 

 

 

482

 

 

(13)%

 

(3)%

Lease contracts

 

 

258

 

 

 

423

 

 

 

498

 

 

(39)%

 

(15)%

Total

 

 

1,382

 

 

 

1,586

 

 

 

1,728

 

 

(13)%

 

(8)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TMNA subvened vehicle financing volume 2:

New retail contracts

 

 

446

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

300

 

 

76%

 

(16)%

Used retail contracts

 

 

48

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

61

 

 

50%

 

(48)%

Lease contracts

 

 

148

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

364

 

 

(40)%

 

(32)%

Total

 

 

642

 

 

 

532

 

 

 

725

 

 

21%

 

(27)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market share of TMNA sales 3:

 

 

53.6

%

 

 

54.9

%

 

 

61.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

(units in thousands):

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2016 to 2015

 

 

2015 to 2014

 

 

TMS new sales volume1

 

 

1,888

 

 

 

1,845

 

 

 

1,735

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vehicle financing volume2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New retail contracts

 

 

628

 

 

 

675

 

 

 

700

 

 

 

(7

)%

 

 

(4

)%

 

Used retail contracts

 

 

288

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

(8

)%

 

Lease contracts

 

 

622

 

 

 

533

 

 

 

451

 

 

 

17

%

 

 

18

%

 

Total

 

 

1,538

 

 

 

1,486

 

 

 

1,453

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TMS subvened vehicle financing volume (units included in the above table):

 

 

New retail contracts

 

 

367

 

 

 

439

 

 

 

414

 

 

 

(16

)%

 

 

6

%

 

Used retail contracts

 

 

52

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

(13

)%

 

 

(27

)%

 

Lease contracts

 

 

541

 

 

 

484

 

 

 

414

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

17

%

 

Total

 

 

960

 

 

 

983

 

 

 

910

 

 

 

(2

)%

 

 

8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TMS subvened vehicle financing volume as a percent of vehicle financing volume:

 

 

New retail contracts

 

 

58.4

%

 

 

65.0

%

 

 

59.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Used retail contracts

 

 

18.1

%

 

 

21.6

%

 

 

27.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease contracts

 

 

87.0

%

 

 

90.8

%

 

 

91.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overall subvened contracts

 

 

62.4

%

 

 

66.2

%

 

 

62.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market share:3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail contracts

 

 

33.1

%

 

 

36.5

%

 

 

40.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease contracts

 

 

32.4

%

 

 

28.8

%

 

 

25.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

65.5

%

 

 

65.3

%

 

 

66.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.
Total financing volume was comprised of approximately 68 percent Toyota, 13 percent Lexus, 12 percent Mazda, and 7 percent non-Toyota/Lexus/Mazda for fiscal 2023. Total financing volume was comprised of approximately 65 percent Toyota, 15 percent Lexus, 13 percent Mazda, and 7 percent non-Toyota/Lexus for fiscal 2022. Total financing volume was comprised of approximately 66 percent Toyota, 15 percent Lexus, 13 percent Mazda, and 6 percent non-Toyota/Lexus for fiscal 2021.

1

Represents total domestic TMS sales of new Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles excluding sales under dealer rental car and commercial fleet programs and sales of a private Toyota distributor.  TMS new sales volume is comprised of approximately 83 percent Toyota and Scion and 17 percent Lexus for both fiscal 2016 and 2015.  TMS new sales volume is comprised of approximately 85 percent Toyota and Scion and 15 percent Lexus for fiscal 2014.

2.
TMNA subvened volume units are included in the total vehicle financing. Units exclude third-party subvened units.

2

Total financing volume is comprised of approximately 79 percent Toyota and Scion, 18 percent Lexus, and 3 percent non-Toyota/Lexus for both fiscal 2016 and 2015.   Total financing volume is comprised of approximately 80 percent Toyota and Scion, 17 percent Lexus and 3 percent non-Toyota/Lexus for fiscal 2014.

3.
Represents the percentage of total domestic TMNA sales of new Toyota and Lexus vehicles financed by us, excluding sales under dealer rental car and commercial fleet programs, sales of a private Toyota distributor and private label vehicles financed.

3

Represents the percentage of total domestic TMS sales of new Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles financed by us, excluding sales under dealer rental car and commercial fleet programs and sales of a private Toyota distributor.



Vehicle Financing Volume

The volume of our retail and lease contracts, which are acquired primarily from Toyota, Lexus, and Lexusprivate label dealers, is substantially dependent upon TMS newTMNA and private label sales volume, the level of TMNA, private label, and subvention.  Vehicle sales by TMS increased 2third-party sponsored subvention and other incentive programs, as well as TMCC competitive rate and other incentive programs.

Our financing volume decreased 13 percent forin fiscal 20162023, compared to fiscal 2015.2022, primarily due to new vehicle inventory constraints and increased competition from other financial institutions, partially offset by higher levels of total incentives and subvention on new and used retail contracts. The ongoing challenging economic conditions, including production constraints due to supply shortages affecting the automotive industry and additional delays affecting the supply chain and logistics networks, have resulted in a decrease in the availability of new vehicles from pre-pandemic levels.

Our financing volume increased 3 percent inmarket share of TMNA sales decreased approximately 1 percentage point for fiscal 20162023, compared to fiscal 2015.  The increase in financing volume was driven primarily by growth in TMS sales. Lease contract volume increased and retail contract volume decreased in fiscal 2016 due primarily to a higher focus by TMS on lease subvention.  Market share for lease contracts increased by approximately 4 percentage points in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, as dealers have increased their utilization of the leasing programs offered.  Overall market share remained relatively consistent compared to fiscal 2015.

The majority of our lease contract terms are 36 and 24 months, which represented 82 percent and 9 percent, respectively, of our lease originations for fiscal 2016 compared to 68 percent and 23 percent, respectively, for the same period in fiscal 2015.2022, due to increased competition from other financial institutions.

37


Table of Contents

The composition of our net earning assets is summarized below:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage change

(Dollars in millions)

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2023 to 2022

 

2022 to 2021

Net Earning Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail finance receivables, net

 

$

78,216

 

 

$

72,185

 

 

$

65,653

 

 

8%

 

10%

Dealer financing, net 1

 

 

12,064

 

 

 

10,247

 

 

 

13,539

 

 

18%

 

(24)%

Total finance receivables, net

 

 

90,280

 

 

 

82,432

 

 

 

79,192

 

 

10%

 

4%

Investments in operating leases, net

 

 

29,869

 

 

 

35,455

 

 

 

37,091

 

 

(16)%

 

(4)%

Net earning assets

 

$

120,149

 

 

$

117,887

 

 

$

116,283

 

 

2%

 

1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average original contract term in months

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease contracts 2

 

 

37

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

Retail contracts 3

 

 

69

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dealer Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Number of dealers serviced)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toyota, Lexus, and private label dealers1

 

 

1,264

 

 

 

966

 

 

 

1,002

 

 

31%

 

(4)%

Dealers outside of the Toyota/Lexus/private label dealer network

 

 

393

 

 

 

399

 

 

 

395

 

 

(2)%

 

1%

Total number of dealers receiving wholesale financing

 

 

1,657

 

 

 

1,365

 

 

 

1,397

 

 

21%

 

(2)%

 

 

March 31,

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2016 to 2015

 

 

2015 to 2014

 

 

Net Earning Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail finance receivables, net1

 

$

49,870

 

 

$

50,257

 

 

$

49,340

 

 

 

(1

)%

 

 

2

%

 

Dealer financing, net2

 

 

15,766

 

 

 

15,636

 

 

 

15,836

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

(1

)%

 

Total finance receivables, net

 

 

65,636

 

 

 

65,893

 

 

 

65,176

 

 

 

-

%

 

 

1

%

 

Investments in operating leases, net

 

 

36,488

 

 

 

31,128

 

 

 

24,769

 

 

 

17

%

 

 

26

%

 

Net earning assets

 

$

102,124

 

 

$

97,021

 

 

$

89,945

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average original contract term in months

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease contracts3

 

 

36

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail contracts4

 

 

63

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dealer Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Number of dealers serviced)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toyota and Lexus dealers2

 

 

998

 

 

 

999

 

 

 

1,001

 

 

 

-

%

 

 

-

%

 

Vehicle dealers outside of the

   Toyota/Lexus dealer network

 

 

398

 

 

 

456

 

 

 

482

 

 

 

(13

)%

 

 

(5

)%

 

Industrial equipment dealers5

 

 

-

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

137

 

 

 

(100

)%

 

 

2

%

 

Total number of dealers receiving

   wholesale financing

 

 

1,396

 

 

 

1,595

 

 

 

1,620

 

 

 

(12

)%

 

 

(2

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dealer inventory outstanding (units in thousands)

 

 

291

 

 

 

301

 

 

 

327

 

 

 

(3

)%

 

 

(8

)%

 

1.
Includes wholesale and other credit arrangements in which we participate as part of a syndicate of lenders.

1

Includes direct finance leases.

2.
Lease contract terms range from 24 months to 60 months.

2

Includes wholesale and other credit arrangements in which we participate as part of a syndicate of lenders.

3.
Retail contract terms range from 24 months to 85 months.

3

Lease contract terms range from 24 months to 60 months.

4

Retail contract terms range from 24 months to 85 months.

5

The commercial finance business was sold on October 1, 2015.



Retail Contract Volume and Earning Assets

Our new retail contract volume decreased 7increased 3 percent during fiscal 20162023 compared to fiscal 20152022, primarily due to a higher focus by TMS on leaselevels of incentives and subvention. Despite higher levels of incentives and subvention, asour used retail contracts decreased 13 percent during fiscal 2023, compared to retail subvention.  Retail contract market share decreased approximately 3 percentage points during fiscal 2016 as compared to the same period in fiscal 20152022, primarily due to increased competition in the decreaseused vehicle marketplace caused by the reduction in new retail contract volume.  Despite decreases in new retail contract volume and market share, ourvehicle inventory levels.

Our retail finance receivables, net remained consistentincreased 8 percent at March 31, 20162023 as compared to March 31, 2015 as the2022 due to higher retail contracts outstanding and higher average amount financed has increased.financed.

Lease Contract Volume and Earning Assets

Our lease contract volume increased 17decreased 39 percent during fiscal 2016 as2023, compared to fiscal 2015.  Much2022, primarily due to new vehicle inventory constraints and lower levels of the increase during fiscal 2016 was attributable to a higher focus by TMS on leaseincentive and subvention in comparison to retail subvention, resulting in a 17 percent increase inprograms. Our investments in operating leases, net, decreased 16 percent at March 31, 20162023 as compared to March 31, 2015.  Market share for lease contracts increased approximately 4 percentage points during fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 20152022, due to the increase inlower average operating lease volume.units outstanding, partially offset by higher vehicle values.

Dealer Financing and Earning Assets

Dealer financing, net remained relatively unchanged fromincreased 18 percent at March 31, 2015, as increases in net earning assets were offset by the sale of the commercial finance business. The decrease in dealer inventory outstanding during fiscal 20162023, as compared to fiscal 2015 is alsoMarch 31, 2022, primarily due to an increase in wholesale and revolving credit financing as well as the salenew inventory financing volume we gained from the launch of our private label financial services to Bass Pro Shops in fiscal 2023.

The ongoing challenging economic conditions, including production constraints due to supply shortages affecting the commercial finance business.automotive industry and additional delays affecting the supply chain and logistics networks, have resulted in lower dealer new vehicle inventory levels from pre-pandemic levels.


38


Table of Contents


Residual Value Risk

We are exposed to risk of loss on the disposition of leased vehicles that are not purchased by lessees, dealers, or third parties at contractual residual value to the extent that sales proceeds realized upon the sale of returned lease assetsvehicles are not sufficient to cover the contractual residual value that was estimated at lease inception.

Factors Affecting Exposure to Residual Value Risk

Residual value represents an estimate of the end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle. The primary factors affecting our exposure to residual value risk are the levels at which residual values are established at lease inception, current economic conditions and outlook, projected end-of-term market values, and the resulting impact on depreciation expense and lease return rates. Higher average operating lease units outstanding and the resulting increase in future maturities, a higher supply of used vehicles, as well as further deterioration in actual and expected used vehicle values for Toyota, Lexus, and private label vehicles could unfavorably impact return rates, residual values, and loss severity.depreciation expense. The evaluation of these factors involves significant assumptions, complex analyses, and management judgment. Refer to “Critical“Critical Accounting Estimates”for further discussion of the estimates involved in the determination of residual values.accumulated depreciation on investments in operating leases.

Residual Values at Lease Inception

Residual values of lease vehicles are estimated at lease inception by examining external industry data, the anticipated Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label product pipeline and our own experience. Factors considered in this evaluation include, but are not limited to, local, regional and national economicmacroeconomic forecasts, historical portfolio trends, new vehicle pricing, new vehicle incentive programs, new vehicle sales, future plans for new Toyota, Lexus and Scion product introductions, competitor actions and behavior, product attributes of popular vehicles, the mix and level of used vehicle supply, the level of current and projected used vehicle values, the actual or perceived quality, safety or reliability of Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicles, buying and leasing behavior trends, and fuel prices. We use various channels to sell vehicles returned at lease-end. Refer to “PartPart 1, Item 1. Business, – Finance“Finance Operations – Retail and Lease Financing – Remarketing” for additional information on remarketing.

End-of-term Market Values

On a quarterly basis, we review the estimated end-of-term market values of leased vehicles to assess the appropriateness of our carrying values. To the extent the estimated end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle is lower than the residual value established at lease inception, the residual value of the leased vehicle is adjusted downward so that the carrying value at lease end will approximate the estimated end-of-term market value. Factors affecting the estimated end-of-term market value are similar to those considered in the evaluation of residual values at lease inception discussed above. These factors are evaluated in the context of their historical trends to anticipate potential changes in the relationship among these factors in the future. For investments in operating leases, adjustments are made on a straight-line basis over the remaining terms of the lease contracts and are included in Depreciation on operating leases in theour Consolidated StatementStatements of Income as a change in accounting estimate.  For direct finance leases, adjustments are made at the time of assessment and are recorded as a reduction of direct finance lease revenues which is included in Retail revenues in the Consolidated Statement of Income.



Lease Return Rate

The lease return rate represents the number of leased vehicles returned to us for sale as a percentage of lease contracts that were originally scheduled to mature in the same period less certain qualified early terminations. When the market value of a leased vehicle at contract maturity is less than its contractual residual value (i.e., the price at which the lease customer or dealer may purchase the leased vehicle), there is a higher probability that the vehicle will be returned to us. In addition, a higher market supply of certain models of used vehicles generally results in a lower relative level of demandmarket value for those vehicles, resulting in a higher probability that the vehicle will be returned to us. A higher rate of vehicle returns exposes us to greater residual value risk of losswhich impacts depreciation expense at lease termination.

Loss Severity

Loss severity is the extent to which the end-of-term market value realized at sale/disposition of a leased vehicle is less than the estimated residual value established at lease inception.  Overall loss severity is driven by used vehicle price levels as well as vehicle return rates.

Impairment of Operating Leases

We reviewevaluate our investment in operating leases portfolio for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the operating leases may not be recoverable.  If such events or changes in circumstances are present,when we determine a triggering event has occurred. When a triggering event has occurred, we perform a test of recoverability by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows (including expected residual values) over the remaining lease terms to the carrying value of the asset group. If the test of recoverability identifies a possible impairment, the asset group’s fair value is measured in accordance with the fair value measurement framework. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset group exceeds its estimated fair value and iswould be recorded in the current periodour Consolidated StatementStatements of Income. As of March 31, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2021 and during the years then ended, there was no indication of impairment in our investment in operating leases portfolio.

39


Table of Contents

Disposition of Off-Lease Vehicles

The following table summarizes scheduled maturities on our vehicle salesoperating lease portfolio and off-lease vehicles sold at lease termination and our scheduled maturities relatedtermination:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage Change

(Units in thousands)

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2023 to 2022

 

2022 to 2021

Scheduled maturities

 

 

486

 

 

 

504

 

 

 

511

 

 

(4)%

 

(1)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vehicles sold through:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dealer Direct program

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grounding dealer

 

 

13

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

110

 

 

(62)%

 

(69)%

Dealer Direct online program

 

 

1

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

31

 

 

(67)%

 

(90)%

Physical auction

 

 

5

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

74

 

 

(29)%

 

(91)%

Total vehicles sold at lease termination 1

 

 

19

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

215

 

 

(57)%

 

(80)%

1.
Excludes leased vehicles purchased by lessees or dealers at contractual residual value prior to our lease portfolio by period:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 to

 

 

2015 to

 

(Units in thousands)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Scheduled maturities

 

 

377

 

 

 

266

 

 

 

345

 

 

 

42

%

 

 

(23

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vehicles sold through:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dealer Direct program

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grounding dealer

 

 

46

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

53

%

 

 

(36

)%

Dealer Direct online program

 

 

15

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

36

%

 

 

(27

)%

Physical auction

 

 

67

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

63

%

 

 

(36

)%

Total vehicles sold at lease termination

 

 

128

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

56

%

 

 

(35

)%

an authorized dealer securing the vehicle.

Scheduled maturities increased 42decreased 4 percent in fiscal 2016 as2023 compared to fiscal 2015.  Fiscal 2015 maturities reflected2022, primarily due to lower leasing and related programs from prior years. Vehicles sold atoperating lease termination in fiscal 2016 increased 56 percent as compared to fiscal 2015.  The higher rate ofunits outstanding. Total vehicles sold at lease termination duringdecreased 57 percent in fiscal 2016, as2023, compared to fiscal 2015, was2022, due to lower units being processed through the result of higher scheduled maturities driven by the increase in our lease portfoliodealer direct program and physical auction. Higher average used vehicle values as well as new vehicle inventory constraints during fiscal 2023 resulted in an increase in return rate.of off-lease vehicles purchased by lessees and dealers at contractual residual value prior to an authorized dealer securing the vehicle. Refer to “PartPart 1, Item 1. Business, – Finance“Finance Operations – Retail and Lease Financing - Remarketing” for additional information on disposal of lease disposition.vehicles.



Depreciation on Operating Leases

We record depreciation expense on the portion of our lease portfolio classified as operating leases.  Depreciation expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is based upon the depreciable basis of the leased vehicle. The depreciable basis is originally established as the difference between a leased vehicle’s original acquisition valuecost and its residual value established at lease inception. Changes to residual values have an effect on depreciation expense. To the extent the estimated end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle is lower than the residual value established at lease inception, the residual value of the leased vehicle is adjusted downward so that the carrying value at lease-end will approximate the estimated end-of-term market value. Refer to “Critical“Critical Accounting Estimates” for a further discussion of the estimatesassumptions involved in the determination of residual values.

Depreciation on operating leases and average operating lease units outstanding are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2016 to 2015

 

 

2015 to 2014

 

 

Depreciation on operating leases

   (dollars in millions)

 

$

5,914

 

 

$

4,857

 

 

$

4,012

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

21

%

 

Average operating lease units outstanding

   (in thousands)

 

 

1,289

 

 

 

1,065

 

 

 

870

 

 

 

21

%

 

 

22

%

 

Depreciation

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

Percentage Change

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

2023 to 2022

 

2022 to 2021

 

Depreciation on operating leases
   (dollars in millions)

 

$

5,122

 

 

$

5,846

 

 

$

5,932

 

 

 

(12)%

 

 

(1

)%

Average operating lease units
   outstanding
   (in thousands)

 

 

1,141

 

 

 

1,314

 

 

 

1,336

 

 

 

(13)%

 

 

(2

)%

We recorded depreciation expense on operating leases increased 22 percent duringof $5.1 billion for fiscal 2016 as2023, compared to $5.8 billion for fiscal 2015,2022. The decrease is primarily due primarily to an increase in thelower average operating lease units outstanding. We continue to experience higher leasing volume which will resultThe ongoing challenging economic conditions have resulted in an increase in our maturities in future years.  The increasea decrease in the lease portfolio over the past several years,availability of new vehicles from pre-pandemic levels. The new vehicle inventory constraints and higher off-lease vehicle purchases by consumers and dealers have led to historically high levels of average used vehicle values. Declines in addition to the higher volume of shorter term leases originatedused vehicle values resulting from increases in the last few years, will resultsupply of new vehicles and increases in maturities increasing by 37 percent in the next twelve months.  We expect that these trendsnew vehicle sales incentives could unfavorably impact return rates, residual values, and depreciation expense.expense in the future.


40


Table of Contents


Credit Risk

We are exposed to credit risk on our consumerretail loans and dealer portfolios. Credit risk on our earning assetsfinance receivables is the risk of loss arising from the failure of customersconsumers or dealers to make contractual payments. The level of credit risk on our consumerretail loan portfolio is influenced by two factors: default frequency and loss severity, which in turn are influenced by various factors such as economic conditions, the used vehicle market, purchase quality mix, and operational changes.

The level of credit risk on our dealer portfolio is influenced by the financial strength of dealers within our portfolio, dealer concentration, collateral quality, and other economic factors. The financial strength of dealers within our portfolio is influenced by, among other factors, general economic conditions, the overall demand for new and used vehicles and the financial condition of automotive manufacturers in general.

Factors Affecting ConsumerRetail Loan Portfolio Credit Risk

Economic Factors

General economic conditions such as changes in unemployment rates, housing values, bankruptcy rates, consumer debt levels, fuel prices, consumer credit performance, interest rates, inflation, household disposable income, US Government stimulus and relief programs, and unforeseen events such as natural disasters, severe weather, health epidemics or geopolitical conflicts, among other factors, can influence both default frequency and loss severity.

Used Vehicle Market

Changes in used vehicle pricesvalues directly affect the proceeds from sales of repossessed vehicles, and accordingly, the level of loss severity we experience. The supply of, and demand for, used vehicles, interest rates, inflation, new vehicle inventory, the level of manufacturer incentivesincentive programs on new vehicles, the manufacturer’s actual or perceived reputation for quality, safety, andor reliability, and general economic outlook are some of the factors affecting the used vehicle market.

Purchase Quality Mix

A change in the mix of contracts acquired at various risk levels may change the amount of credit risk we assume. An increase in the number of contracts acquired with lower credit quality (as measured by scores that establish a consumer’s creditworthiness based on present financial condition, experience, and credit history) can increase the amount of credit risk. Conversely, an increase in the number of contracts with higher credit quality can lower credit risk. An increase in the mix of contracts with lower credit quality can also increase operational risk unless appropriate controls and procedures are established. We strive to price contracts to achieve an appropriate risk adjusted return on our investment.

The average original contract term of retail and leaseloan contracts influences credit losses. Longer term contracts generally experience a higher rate of default and thus affect default frequency. In addition, the carrying values of vehicles under longer term contracts decline at a slower rate, resulting in a longer period during which we may be subject to used vehicle market volatility, which may in turn lead to increased loss severity.

The types and models of the vehicles in our retail and lease portfolios haveloan portfolio has an effect on loss severity. Vehicle product mix can be influenced by factors such as customer preferences, fuel efficiency and fuel prices. These factors impact the demand for and pricesvalues of used vehicles and consequently, loss severity.

Operational Changes

Operational changes and ongoing implementation of new information and transaction systems and improved methods of consumer evaluation are designed to have a positive effect on the credit risk profile of our consumerretail loan portfolio. Customer service improvements in the management of delinquencies and credit losses increase operational efficiency and effectiveness. We remain focused on our service operations and credit loss mitigation methods. We are exposed to operational risk related to potential changes in the regulatory landscape which may limit our ability to conduct pre and post charge-off collections activity.

In an effort to mitigate credit losses, we regularly evaluate our purchasing practices. We limit our risk exposure by limiting approvals of lower credit quality contracts and requiring certain loan-to-value ratios.

We continue to refine our credit risk management and analysis to ensure that the appropriate level of collection resources are aligned with portfolio risk, and we adjust capacity accordingly. We continue ourto focus on early and late stage delinquencies to increase the likelihood of resolution. We have also increased efficiency in our collections through the use of technology.


41


Table of Contents


Factors Affecting Dealer Portfolio Credit Risk

The financial strength of dealers to which we extend credit directly affects our credit risk. Lending to dealers with lower credit quality, or a negative change in the credit quality of existing dealers, increases the risk of credit loss we assume. Extending a substantial amount of financing or commitments to a specific dealer or group of dealers creates a concentration of credit risk, particularly when the financing may not be secured by fully realizable collateral assets. Collateral quality influences credit risk in that lower quality collateral increases the risk that in the event of default and subsequent liquidation of collateral, the value of the collateral may be less than the amount owed to us.

We assign risk classifications to each of our dealers and dealer groups based on their financial condition, the strength of the collateral, and other quantitative and qualitative factors including input from our field personnel. Our monitoring processes of the dealers and dealer groups are based on these risk classifications. We periodically update the risk classifications based on changes in financial condition. As part of our monitoring processes, we require dealers to submit monthlyperiodic financial statements. We also perform periodic physical audits of vehicle inventory andas well as monitor the timeliness of wholesaledealer inventory financing payoffs in accordance with the agreed-upon terms in order to identify possible risks. We continue to enhance our risk management processes to mitigate dealer portfolio risk and to focus on higher risk dealers through enhanced risk governance, inventory audits, and credit watch processes. Where appropriate, we increase the frequency of our audits and examine more closely the financial condition of the dealer or dealer group. We continue to be diligent in underwriting dealers and have conducted targeted personnel training to address dealer credit risk.

Dealer portfolio credit risk is mitigatedAdditionally, TMNA and other manufacturers may be obligated by aapplicable law, or under agreements with us, to repurchase agreement between TMCCor to reassign new vehicle inventory we financed that meets certain mileage and TMS.  Pursuant to this agreement, TMS will arrange for the repurchase of new Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles at the aggregate cost financed by TMCC in the event of a dealer default under wholesale financing.  In addition, wemodel year parameters, curtailing our risk. We also provide other types of financing to certain Toyota and Lexus dealers and other third parties at the request of TMSTMNA or private Toyota distributors, and the credit risk associated with such financing is mitigated by guarantees from TMSTMNA or the applicable private distributors.

We also provide financing for some dealerships which sell products not distributed by TMSTMNA or any of its affiliates. A significant adverse change in a non-Toyota/Lexus manufacturer such as restructuring andor bankruptcy may increase the risk associated with the dealers we have financed that sell these products.


42


Table of Contents


Origination, Credit Loss, and Delinquency Experience

Our credit loss experience may be affected by a number of factors including the economic environment, our purchasing, servicing, and servicingcollections practices, used vehicle market conditions and subvention. Changes in the economy that impact the consumer such as increasing interest rates, and a rise in the unemployment rate as well as higher debt balances, coupled with deterioration in actual and expected used vehicle values, could increase our credit losses. In addition, a decline in the effectiveness of our collection practices could also increase our credit losses. We continuously evaluate and refine our purchasing practices and collection efforts to minimize risk. In addition, subvention contributes to our overall portfolio quality, as subvened contracts typically have higher credit scores than non-subvened contracts. For information regarding the potential impact of current market conditions, refer to “PartPart I. Item 1A. Risk Factors”Factors.

The following table provides information related to our origination experience:

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Average consumer portfolio origination FICO score

 

 

744

 

 

 

742

 

 

 

744

 

Average consumer retail loan origination term (months) 1

 

 

69

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

68

 

1.
Retail loan origination greater than or equal to 78 months was 10%, 10%, 8% as of March 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.

While we have included the average origination FICO score to illustrate origination trends, we also use a proprietary credit scoring system to evaluate an applicant’s risk profile. Refer to Part I. Item 1. Business “Finance Operations” for further discussion of the proprietary manner in which we evaluate risk.

The following table provides information related to our finance receivables and investment in operating leases:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Net charge-offs as a percentage of average
    finance receivables
1, 5

 

0.54%

 

 

0.22%

 

 

0.29%

 

Default frequency as a percentage of outstanding
    finance receivables contracts
1

 

0.89%

 

 

0.72%

 

 

0.90%

 

Average finance receivables loss severity per unit 2

 

$

12,425

 

 

$

9,012

 

 

$

10,035

 

Aggregate balances for accounts 60 or more days
    past due as a percentage of earning assets
 3, 4, 5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables

 

0.61%

 

 

0.43%

 

 

0.27%

 

Operating leases

 

0.40%

 

 

0.26%

 

 

0.20%

 

1.
Net charge-off includes the write-offs of accounts deemed to be uncollectable and accounts greater than 120 days past due.
2.
Average loss per unit upon disposition of repossessed vehicles or charge-off prior to repossession.
3.
Substantially all retail receivables do not involve recourse to the dealer in the event of customer default.
4.
Includes accounts in bankruptcy and excludes accounts for which vehicles have been repossessed.
5.
Excludes accrued interest from average finance receivables.

Management considers historical credit loss experience:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net charge-offs as a percentage of average gross

   earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables

 

 

0.42

%

 

 

0.32

%

 

 

0.31

%

Operating leases

 

 

0.31

%

 

 

0.23

%

 

 

0.19

%

Total

 

 

0.38

%

 

 

0.29

%

 

 

0.28

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Default frequency as a percentage of outstanding

   contracts

 

 

1.27

%

 

 

1.21

%

 

 

1.17

%

Average loss severity per unit1

 

$

6,934

 

 

$

6,632

 

 

$

6,341

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate balances for accounts 60 or more days

   past due as a percentage of gross earning assets2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables3

 

 

0.29

%

 

 

0.23

%

 

 

0.19

%

Operating leases3

 

 

0.22

%

 

 

0.17

%

 

 

0.15

%

Total

 

 

0.26

%

 

 

0.21

%

 

 

0.18

%

1

Average loss per unit upon disposition of repossessed vehicles or charge-off prior to repossession.

2

Substantially all retail, direct finance lease and operating lease receivables do not involve recourse to the dealer in the event of customer default.

3

Includes accounts in bankruptcy and excludes accounts for which vehicles have been repossessed.

The level ofinformation when assessing the allowance for credit losses. Historical credit losses are primarily reflectsdriven by two factors: default frequency and loss severity. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average gross earning assetsfinance receivables increased from 0.29to 0.54 percent at March 31, 2015 to 0.382023 from 0.22 percent at March 31, 2016 due to increased2022 and default frequency, loss severity and lower recoveries.  Default frequency as a percentage of outstanding finance receivables contracts increased to 1.270.89 percent for fiscal 20162023 compared to 1.210.72 percent for fiscal 2015.2022. Our average finance receivables loss severity per unit for fiscal 20162023 increased to $6,934$12,425 from $6,632$9,012 in fiscal 2015.2022. The increase in net charge-offs, default frequency, and loss severity per unit were due to higher average amounts financed, a higher percentage of used vehicles financed, and higher delinquencies.

Our aggregate balances for accounts 60 or more days past due on finance receivables increased to 0.61 percent at March 31, 2023, compared to 0.43 percent at March 31, 2022. Our aggregate balances for accounts 60 or more days past due on operating leases increased to 0.40 percent at March 31, 2023, compared to 0.26 percent at March 31, 2022. Our delinquencies increased to 0.26 percent for fiscal 2016at March 31, 2023 compared to 0.21 percent for fiscal 2015 as a resultMarch 31, 2022 primarily due to the ongoing challenging economic conditions.

43


Table of rising consumer debt levels as customers experienced greater access to credit.Contents



Allowance for Credit Losses

We maintain an allowance for credit losses to cover probable and estimable losses as of the balance sheet date resulting from the non-performance of our customers and dealers under their contractual obligations.  The determination of the allowance involves significant assumptions, complex analyses, and management judgment.  Refer to “Critical Accounting Estimates” for further discussion of the estimates involved in determining the allowance for creditwhich is measured by an impairment model that reflects lifetime expected losses.

The allowance for credit losses for our consumerretail loan portfolio is established throughmeasured on a process that estimates probable losses incurredcollective basis when loans have similar risk characteristics such as of the balance sheet date based upon consistently applied statistical analyses of portfolio data.  This process utilizes delinquency migration analysis, in which historical delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the portfolio, and incorporates current and expected trendsloan-to-value ratio, book payment-to-income ratio, FICO score at origination, collateral type, contract term, and other relevant factors. We use statistical models to estimate lifetime expected credit losses of our retail loan portfolio segment by applying probability of default and loss given default to the exposure at default on a loan level basis. Probability of default models are developed from internal risk scoring models which consider variables such as delinquency status, historical default frequency, and other credit quality indicators. Other credit quality indicators include loan-to-value ratio, book payment-to-income ratio, FICO score at origination, collateral type (new or used, Lexus, Toyota, or private label), and contract term. Loss given default models forecast the extent of losses given that a default has occurred and consider variables such as collateral, trends in recoveries, historical loss severity, and other contract structure variables. Exposure at default represents the expected outstanding principal balance, including the effects of expected prepayment when applicable. The lifetime expected credit losses incorporate the probability-weighted forward-looking macroeconomic forecasts for baseline, favorable, and adverse scenarios. The loan lifetime is regarded by management as the reasonable and supportable period. We use macroeconomic forecasts from a third party and update such forecasts quarterly. On an ongoing basis, we review our models, including macroeconomic factors, including used vehicle market conditions, economic conditions, unemployment rates, purchase quality mix,the selection of macroeconomic scenarios and operational factors.  This process, along with management judgment, is usedtheir weighting to establishensure they reflect the allowance to cover probable and estimable losses incurred asrisk of the balance sheet date.  Movement in any of these factors would cause changes in estimated probable losses.portfolio.

TheFor the allowance for credit losses for our dealer portfolio, an allowance for credit losses is established for both outstanding dealer finance receivables and certain unfunded off-balance sheet lending commitments. The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective basis when loans have similar risk characteristics such as dealer group internal risk rating and loan-to-value ratios. We measure lifetime expected credit losses of our dealer products portfolio segment by aggregating dealer financing receivables into loan-risk pools, which are determinedapplying probability of default and loss given default to the exposure at default on a loan level basis. Probability of default is primarily established based on internal risk assessments. The probability of default model also considers qualitative factors related to macroeconomic outlooks. Loss given default is established based on the risk characteristicsnature and market value of the collateral, loan-to-value ratios and other credit quality indicators. Exposure at default represents the expected outstanding principal balance. The lifetime of the loan (e.g. securedor lending commitment is regarded by vehicles, real estatemanagement as the reasonable and supportable period. On an ongoing basis, we review our models, including macroeconomic outlooks, to ensure they reflect the risk of the portfolio.

If management does not believe the models reflect lifetime expected credit losses, a qualitative adjustment is made to reflect management judgment regarding observable changes in recent or dealership assets).  We analyze the loan-risk pools using internally developed risk ratings for each dealer. In addition, we have established procedures that focus on managing high risk loans in our dealer portfolio. Our field operations managementexpected economic trends and special assets group are consulted each quarter to determine if any specific dealer loan is considered impaired. If impaired loans are identified, specific reserves are established, as appropriate,conditions, portfolio composition, and the loan is removed from the loan-risk pool for separate monitoring.other relevant factors.

The following table provides information related to our allowance for credit losses:losses for finance receivables and certain off-balance sheet lending commitments:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period

 

$

1,272

 

 

$

1,215

 

 

$

727

 

Adoption of ASU 2016-13 1

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

292

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(535

)

 

 

(237

)

 

 

(287

)

Recoveries

 

 

63

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

57

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

713

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

426

 

Allowance for credit losses at end of period 2

 

$

1,513

 

 

$

1,272

 

 

$

1,215

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period

 

$

485

 

 

$

454

 

 

$

527

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

441

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

170

 

Transferred to held-for-sale1

 

 

(7

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Charge-offs, net of recoveries2

 

 

(384

)

 

 

(277

)

 

 

(243

)

Allowance for credit losses at end of period

 

$

535

 

 

$

485

 

 

$

454

 

1.
Cumulative pre-tax adjustments recorded to retained earnings as of April 1, 2020.

1

Amount relates to the commercial finance business which was sold on October 1, 2015.

2.
Ending balances as of March 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 include $24 million, $26 million, and $37 million, respectively, of allowance for credit losses recorded in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets which is related to off-balance-sheet commitments.

2

Charge-offs are shown net of recoveries of $72 million, $86 million, and $85 million in fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of gross earning

   assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables

 

 

0.64

%

 

 

0.62

%

 

 

0.59

%

Operating leases

 

 

0.31

%

 

 

0.24

%

 

 

0.27

%

Total

 

 

0.52

%

 

 

0.50

%

 

 

0.50

%

During fiscal 2016, our

44


Table of Contents

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

2023

 

2022

 

2021

Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of
     finance receivables
1

 

1.62%

 

1.49%

 

1.47%

1.
Ending balances as of March 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 exclude $24 million, $26 million, and $37 million, respectively, of allowance for credit losses recorded in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets which is related to off-balance-sheet commitments.

Our allowance for credit losses increased $50 million from $485 million$1.3 billion at March 31, 20152022 to $535 million$1.5 billion at March 31, 2016.  The increase in the allowance for credit losses as compared to fiscal 2015 was due primarily to higher default frequency2023 and loss severity, lower recoveries, general portfolio growth and additional provision for dealer finance receivables.

The total allowance for credit losses as a percentage of gross earning assets increased slightly to 0.52 percent in fiscal 2016 as compared to 0.50 percent in fiscal 2015.  The slight increase in the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of gross earning assets for finance receivables from 0.62increased to 1.62 percent in fiscal 2015 to 0.642023 from 1.49 percent in fiscal 2016 is primarily due2022. The economic conditions have resulted in an increase in consumer delinquencies and charge-offs as well as higher expectations of credit losses in the retail loan portfolio. These factors combined with the increase in the size of our retail loan portfolio have led to additional provision for dealer finance receivables.  Thean increase in the allowance for credit losseslosses.

Future changes in the economy that impact the consumer and consumer confidence such as increasing interest rates and a percentagerise in the unemployment rate as well as higher debt balances, coupled with deterioration in actual and expected used vehicle values, could result in further increases to our allowance for credit losses. In addition, a decline in the effectiveness of gross earning assetsour collection practices could also increase our allowance for credit losses.

45


Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Requirements, Obligations, and Arrangements

Our primary material cash requirements include the acquisition of finance receivables and investment in operating leases from 0.24 percentdealers, providing various financing to dealers, payments related to debt, interest and interest rate swaps, operating expenses, voluntary protection contract expenses, income taxes, and dividend payments. In conjunction with our cash requirements, we have certain obligations to make future payments under contracts and commitments. Aggregate contractual obligations and commitments in fiscal 2015existence at March 31, 2023, are summarized as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

 

Payments due by period

 

Contractual obligations

 

2024

 

 

2025

 

 

2026

 

 

2027

 

 

2028

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

Debt 1

 

$

49,501

 

 

$

22,224

 

 

$

16,694

 

 

$

8,293

 

 

$

8,307

 

 

$

7,151

 

 

$

112,170

 

Estimated interest payments for
    debt
2

 

 

2,610

 

 

 

1,618

 

 

 

1,022

 

 

 

659

 

 

 

417

 

 

 

570

 

 

 

6,896

 

Premises occupied under lease

 

 

18

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

106

 

Purchase obligations 3

 

 

18

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

19

 

Total

 

$

52,147

 

 

$

23,858

 

 

$

17,730

 

 

$

8,965

 

 

$

8,737

 

 

$

7,754

 

 

$

119,191

 

1.
Debt reflects the remaining principal obligation. Foreign currency denominated debt principal is based on exchange rates as of March 31, 2023. Debt excludes unamortized premium/discount and debt issuance costs of $485 million.
2.
Interest payments for debt payable in foreign currencies or based on variable interest rates are estimated using the applicable current rates as of March 31, 2023.
3.
Purchase obligations represent fixed or minimum payment obligations under supplier contracts. The amounts included herein represent the minimum contractual obligations in certain situations; however, actual amounts incurred may be substantially higher depending on the particular circumstance, including in the case of information technology contracts, the amount of usage once we have implemented it. Contracts that do not specify fixed payments or provide for a minimum payment are not included. The contracts noted herein contain voluntary provisions under which the contract may be terminated for a specified fee depending upon the contract.

The contractual obligations and commitments in the above table do not include our contractual obligations on derivative instruments because future cash obligations under these contracts are inherently uncertain. We recognize all derivative instruments on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The amounts recognized as fair value do not represent the amounts that will be ultimately paid or received upon settlement under these contracts. Refer to 0.31 percentNote 6 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion and disclosure.

In addition, the contractual obligations and commitments in fiscal 2016 reflects portfolio growththe above table do not include term loans and revolving lines of 17 percentcredit we extend to dealers and dealer groups and other off-balance sheet guarantees and commitments, as the amount, if any, and timing of future payments is uncertain.

We provide fixed and variable rate credit facilities to dealers and various multi-franchise organizations referred to as dealer groups. These credit facilities are typically used for facilities construction and refurbishment, working capital requirements, real estate purchases, business acquisitions, and other general business purposes. These loans are typically secured with liens on real estate, vehicle inventory, and/or other dealership assets, as appropriate, and may be guaranteed by the individual or corporate guarantees of the affiliated dealers, dealer groups, or dealer principals. Refer to Note 9 – Commitments and Contingenciesof the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion and disclosure on credit facility commitments with dealers.

We have also extended credit facilities to affiliates as described in investmentsNote 12 – Related Party Transactions of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

TMCC has guaranteed the payments of principal and interest with respect to the bond obligations that were issued by Putnam County, West Virginia and Gibson County, Indiana to finance the construction of pollution control facilities at manufacturing plants of certain TMCC affiliates. TMCC would be required to perform under the guarantees in operating leases, whichthe event of non-payment on the bonds and other related obligations. TMCC is drivenentitled to reimbursement by TMS’s increased focus on lease subvention.the applicable affiliates for any amounts paid. TMCC receives a nominal annual fee for guaranteeing such payments. Other than this fee, there are no corresponding expenses or cash flows arising from our guarantees. The nature, business purpose, and amounts of these guarantees are described in Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


46


Table of Contents


In the ordinary course of business, we enter into agreements containing indemnification provisions standard in the industry related to several types of transactions. Refer to Note 9 – Commitments and ContingenciesLIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of agreements containing indemnification provisions. We have not made any material payments in the past as a result of these provisions, and as of March 31, 2023, we determined that it is not probable that we will be required to make any material payments in the future. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, no amounts have been recorded under these indemnification provisions.

Liquidity

Liquidity risk is the risk relating to our ability to meet our financial obligations when they come due. Our liquidity strategy is to ensure that we maintain the ability to fund assets and repay liabilities in a timely and cost-effective manner, even in adverse market conditions. Our strategy includes raising funds via the global capital markets and through loans, credit facilities, and other transactions, as well as generating liquidity from our earning assets. This strategy has led us to develop a diversified borrowing base that is distributed across a variety of markets, geographies, investors, and financing structures, among other factors.structures.

The following table summarizes the components of our outstanding funding sources at carrying value:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Commercial paper1

 

$

26,608

 

 

$

27,006

 

Unsecured notes and loans payable2

 

 

52,856

 

 

 

52,307

 

Secured notes and loans payable

 

 

14,139

 

 

 

10,837

 

Carrying value adjustment3

 

 

122

 

 

 

81

 

Total debt

 

$

93,725

 

 

$

90,231

 

1

Includes unamortized premium/discount.

2

Includes unamortized premium/discount and the effects of foreign currency transaction gains and losses on non-hedged or de-designated notes and loans payable which are denominated in foreign currencies.

3

Represents the effects of fair value adjustments to debt in hedging relationships, accrued redemption premiums, and the unamortized fair value adjustments on the hedged item for terminated fair value hedge accounting relationships.

Liquidity management involves forecasting and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet our cash needs, including unanticipated events. To ensure adequate liquidity through a full range of potential operating environments and market conditions, we conduct our liquidity management and business activities in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on developing and maintaining direct relationships with commercial paper investors and wholesale market funding providers and maintaining the ability to sell certain assets when and if conditions warrant.

We develop and maintain contingency funding plans and regularly evaluate our liquidity position under various operating circumstances, allowing us to assess how we will be able to operate through a period of stress when access to normal sources of capital is constrained. The plans project funding requirements during a potential period of stress, specify and quantify sources of liquidity, and outline actions and procedures for effectively managing through the problem period. In addition, we monitor the ratings and credit exposure of the lenders that participate in our credit facilities to ascertain any issues that may arise with potential draws on these facilities if that contingency becomes warranted.

We maintain broad access to a variety of domestic and global markets and may choose to realign our funding activities depending upon market conditions, relative costs, and other factors. We believe that our funding sources, combined with operating and investing activities, provide sufficient liquidity to meet future funding requirements and business growth. Our funding volume is primarily based on expected net change in earning assets and debt maturities.

For liquidity purposes, we hold cash in excess of our immediate funding needs. These excess funds are invested in short-term, highly liquid and investment grade money market instruments as well as certain available-for-sale debt securities, which provide liquidity for our short-term funding needs and flexibility in the use of our other funding sources. We maintained excess funds ranging from $6.3$5.0 billion to $14.7$12.2 billion with an average balance of $9.0$9.1 billion forduring fiscal 2016.2023. The amount of excess funds we hold may fluctuate, depending on market conditions and other factors. We also have access to liquidity under a $5.0 billion credit facility with TMS, which as of March 31, 2023 had no outstanding amount and is further described in Note 7 – Debt and Credit Facilities of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe we have sufficient capacity to meet our short-term funding requirements and manage our liquidity.

We may lend to or borrow from affiliates on terms based upon a number of business factors such as funds availability, cash flow timing, relative cost of funds, and market access capabilities.

Credit support is provided to us by our indirect parent TFSC, and, in turn, to TFSC by TMC. Taken together, these credit support agreements provide an additional source of liquidity to us, although we do not rely upon such credit support in our liquidity planning and capital and risk management. The credit support agreements are not a guarantee by TMC or TFSC of any securities or obligations of TFSC or TMCC, respectively. The fees paid pursuant to these agreements are disclosed in Note 1512 – Related Party Transactionsof the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



TMC’s obligations under its credit support agreement with TFSC rank pari passu with TMC’s senior unsecured debt obligations. Refer to “PartPart I, Item 1A. Risk Factors - Our– “Our borrowing costs and access to the unsecured debt capital markets depend significantly on the credit ratings of TMCC and its parent companies and our credit support arrangements” for further discussion.

We routinely monitor global financial conditions and our financial exposure to our global counterparties, particularly in those countries experiencing significant economic, fiscal or political strain, and the corresponding likelihood of default. These countries include but are not limited to Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, Spain, Cyprus, Russia, and Ukraine.  We do not currently have exposure to these or other sovereign counterparties.  As of March 31, 2016,2023, our grossexposure to foreign sovereign and non-sovereign exposures to investments in marketable securities and derivatives counterparty positions in countries experiencing such issues werecounterparties was not material, either individually or collectively.  We also maintained a total of $20.3 billion in committed syndicated and bilateral credit facilities for our liquidity purposes as of March 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2016, approximately 3 percent of such commitments were from counterparties in such countries.significant. Refer to the “Liquidity“Liquidity and Capital Resources - LiquidityCredit Facilities and Letters of Credit” section and “PartPart I, Item 1A. Risk Factors - The– “The failure or commercial soundness of our counterparties and other financial institutions may have an effect on our liquidity, operating results of operations or financial condition” for further discussion.

47


Table of Contents

Funding

The following table summarizes the components of our outstanding debt which includes unamortized premiums, discounts, debt issuance costs and the effects of foreign currency translation adjustments:

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

March 31, 2022

(Dollars in millions)

 

Face value

 

 

Carrying value

 

 

Weighted average
contractual interest rates

 

Face value

 

 

Carrying value

 

 

Weighted average
contractual interest rates

Unsecured notes and loans payable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial paper

 

$

16,946

 

 

$

16,737

 

 

5.01%

 

$

16,896

 

 

$

16,876

 

 

0.43%

U.S. medium term note
  ("MTN") program

 

 

45,727

 

 

 

45,576

 

 

3.11%

 

 

46,387

 

 

 

46,235

 

 

1.55%

Euro medium term note
  ("EMTN") program

 

 

12,104

 

 

 

12,022

 

 

2.10%

 

 

13,891

 

 

 

13,813

 

 

1.54%

Other debt

 

 

4,616

 

 

 

4,614

 

 

5.08%

 

 

5,368

 

 

 

5,364

 

 

1.28%

Total Unsecured notes and loans
  payable

 

 

79,393

 

 

 

78,949

 

 

3.48%

 

 

82,542

 

 

 

82,288

 

 

1.30%

Secured notes and loans payable

 

 

32,777

 

 

 

32,736

 

 

3.76%

 

 

26,907

 

 

 

26,864

 

 

1.01%

Total debt

 

$

112,170

 

 

$

111,685

 

 

3.56%

 

$

109,449

 

 

$

109,152

 

 

1.23%

Unsecured notes and loans payable

The following table summarizes the significant activities by program of our Unsecured notes and loans payable:

(Dollars in millions)

 

Commercial paper 1

 

 

MTNs

 

 

EMTNs

 

 

Other

 

 

Total
Unsecured
notes and
loans
payable

 

Balance at March 31, 2022

 

$

16,896

 

 

$

46,387

 

 

$

13,891

 

 

$

5,368

 

 

$

82,542

 

Issuances

 

 

50

 

 

 

14,850

 

 

 

3,183

 

 

 

1,149

 

 

 

19,232

 

Maturities and terminations

 

 

-

 

 

 

(15,510

)

 

 

(4,932

)

 

 

(1,901

)

 

 

(22,343

)

Non-cash changes in foreign currency rates

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(38

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(38

)

Balance at March 31, 2023

 

$

16,946

 

 

$

45,727

 

 

$

12,104

 

 

$

4,616

 

 

$

79,393

 

Issuances during the one month ended
  April 30, 2023

 

$

3,173

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

28

 

 

$

3,201

 

1.
Changes in Commercial Paperpaper are shown net due to its short duration.

Commercial paper

Short-term funding needs are met through the issuance of commercial paper in the United States.U.S. Commercial paper outstanding under our commercial paper programs ranged from approximately $25.1$16.5 billion to $29.8$18.1 billion during fiscal 2016,2023, with an average outstanding balance of $27.2$17.4 billion. Our commercial paper programs are supported by the liquiditycredit facilities discussed under the heading “Liquidity“Credit Facilities and Letters of Credit.” We believe we have amplesufficient capacity to meet our short-term funding requirements and manage our liquidity.


MTN program


Unsecured Notes and Loans Payable

The following table summarizes the components of our unsecured notes and loans payable:

(Dollars in millions)

 

U.S. medium

term notes

("MTNs")

and domestic

bonds

 

 

 

Euro

MTNs

("EMTNs")

 

 

 

Eurobonds

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Total

unsecured

notes and

loans

payable5

 

Balance at March 31, 2015¹

 

$

32,722

 

 

 

$

16,100

 

 

 

$

480

 

 

$

5,222

 

 

 

$

54,524

 

Issuances during fiscal 2016

 

 

10,366

 

2

 

 

3,173

 

3

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,050

 

4

 

 

15,589

 

Maturities and terminations during fiscal 2016

 

 

(9,420

)

 

 

 

(4,625

)

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2,050

)

 

 

 

(16,095

)

Balance at March 31, 2016¹

 

$

33,668

 

 

 

$

14,648

 

 

 

$

480

 

 

$

5,222

 

 

 

$

54,018

 

Issuances during the one month ended April 30, 2016

 

$

3,616

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

500

 

 

 

$

4,116

 

1

Amounts represent par values and as such exclude unamortized premium/discount, foreign currency transaction gains and losses on debt denominated in foreign currencies, fair value adjustments to debt in hedge accounting relationships, accrued redemption premiums, and the unamortized fair value adjustments on the hedged item for terminated hedge accounting relationships.  Par values of non-U.S. currency denominated notes are determined using foreign exchange rates applicable as of the issuance dates.

2

MTNs and domestic bonds issued during fiscal 2016 had terms to maturity ranging from approximately 1 year to 30 years, and had interest rates at the time of issuance ranging from 0.6 percent to 4.3 percent.

3

EMTNs issued during fiscal 2016 had terms to maturity ranging from approximately 2 years to 6 years, and had interest rates at the time of issuance ranging from 0.0 percent to 3.6 percent.

4

Consists of long-term borrowings, with terms to maturity from approximately 1 year to 5 years, and interest rates at the time of issuance ranging from 0.4 percent to 1.5 percent.  

5

Consists of fixed and floating rate debt and other obligations.  Upon the issuance of fixed rate debt and other obligations, we generally elect to enter into pay float interest rate swaps.  Refer to “Derivative Instruments” for further discussion.

We maintain a shelf registration statement with the SEC to provide for the issuance of debt securities in the U.S. capital markets to retail and institutional investors. We currently qualify as a well-known seasoned issuer under SEC rules, which allows us to issue under our registration statement an unlimited amount of debt securities during the three yearthree-year period ending February 2018.January 2024. Debt securities issued under the U.S. shelf registration statement are issued pursuant to the terms of an indenture which requires TMCC to comply with certain covenants, including negative pledge and cross-default provisions. We are currently in compliance with these covenants.

48


Table of Contents

EMTN program

Our EMTN program, shared with our affiliates Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V., Toyota Credit Canada Inc. and Toyota Finance Australia Limited (TMCC and such affiliates, the “EMTN Issuers”), provides for the issuance of debt securities in the international capital markets. In September 2015,2022, the EMTN Issuers renewed the EMTN program for a one yearone-year period. The maximum aggregate principal amount authorized under the EMTN Program to be outstanding at any time is €50.0€60.0 billion or the equivalent in other currencies, of which €28.0 billion was available for issuance at April 30, 2016.currencies. The authorized amount is shared among all EMTN Issuers. The authorized aggregate principal amount under the EMTN program may be increased from time to time. Debt securities issued under the EMTN program are issued pursuant to the terms of an agency agreement. Certain debt securities issued under the EMTN program are subject to negative pledge provisions. Debt securities issued under our EMTN program prior to October 2007 are also subject to cross-default provisions.  We are currently in compliance with these covenants.

Other debt

TMCC has entered into term loan agreements with various banks. These term loan agreements contain covenants and conditions customary in transactions of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions and limitations on certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. We are currently in compliance with these covenants and conditions.  In addition, we

We may issue other debt securities through the global capital markets or enter into unsecured financing arrangements.borrow from affiliates on terms based upon a number of business factors such as funds availability, cash flow timing, relative cost of funds, and market access capabilities. Amounts borrowed from affiliates are recorded in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are therefore excluded from Debt amounts.


Secured notes and loans payable


Secured Notes and Loans Payable

Overview

Asset-backed securitization of our earning asset portfolio provides us with an alternative source of funding. We regularly execute public or private securitization transactions.

The following table summarizes the significant activities of our Secured notes and loans payable:

(Dollars in millions)

 

Secured
notes and
loans
payable

 

Balance at March 31, 2022

 

$

26,907

 

Issuances

 

 

19,732

 

Maturities and terminations

 

 

(13,862

)

Balance at March 31, 2023

 

$

32,777

 

Issuances during the one month ended April 30, 2023

 

$

1,140

 

We securitize finance receivables and beneficial interests in investments in operating leases (“Securitized Assets”) using a variety of structures. Our securitization transactions involve the transfer of Securitized Assets to bankruptcy-remote special purpose entities. These bankruptcy-remote entities are used to ensure that the Securitized Assets are isolated from the claims of creditors of TMCC and that the cash flows from these assets are available solely for the benefit of the investors in these asset-backed securities. Investors in asset-backed securities do not have recourse to our otherOther assets, and neither TMCC nor our affiliates guarantee these obligations. We are not required to repurchase or make reallocation payments with respect to the Securitized Assets that become delinquent or default after securitization. As seller and servicer of the Securitized Assets, we are required to repurchase or make a reallocation payment with respect to the underlying assets that are subsequently discovered not to have met specified eligibility requirements. This repurchase obligation is customary in securitization transactions. With the exception of our revolving asset-backed securitization program, funding obtained from our securitization transactions is repaid as the underlying Securitized Assets amortize.

We service the Securitized Assets in accordance with our customary servicing practices and procedures. Our servicing duties include collecting payments on Securitized Assets and submitting them to a trustee for distribution to security holders and other interest holders. We prepare monthly servicer certificates on the performance of the Securitized Assets, including collections, investor distributions, delinquencies, and credit losses. We also perform administrative services for the special purpose entities.

Our use of special purpose entities in securitizations is consistent with conventional practice in the securitization market. None of our officers, directors, or employees hold any equity interests or receive any direct or indirect compensation from our special purpose entities. These entities do not own our stock or the stock of any of our

49


Table of Contents

affiliates. Each special purpose entity has a limited purpose and generally is permitted only to purchase assets, issue asset-backed securities, and make payments to the security holders, other interest holders and certain service providers as required under the terms of the transactions.

Our securitizations are structured to provide credit enhancement to reduce the risk of loss to security holders and other interest holders in the asset-backed securities. Credit enhancement may include some or all of the following:

·

Overcollateralization:  The principal of the Securitized Assets that exceeds the principal amount of the related secured debt.

Overcollateralization: The principal of the Securitized Assets that exceeds the principal amount of the related secured debt.

·

Excess spread:  The expected interest collections on the Securitized Assets that exceed the expected fees and expenses of the special purpose entity, including the interest payable on the debt, net of swap settlements, if any.

Excess spread: The expected interest collections on the Securitized Assets that exceed the expected fees and expenses of the special purpose entity, including the interest payable on the debt, net of swap settlements, if any.

·

Cash reserve funds:  A portion of the proceeds from the issuance of asset-backed securities may be held by the securitization trust in a segregated reserve fund and may be used to pay principal and interest to security holders and other interest holders if collections on the underlying receivables are insufficient.

Cash reserve funds: A portion of the proceeds from the issuance of asset-backed securities may be held by the securitization trust in a segregated reserve fund and may be used to pay principal and interest to security holders and other interest holders if collections on the underlying receivables are insufficient.

·

Yield supplement arrangements:  Additional overcollateralization may be provided to supplement the future contractual interest payments from securitized receivables with relatively low contractual interest rates.

Yield supplement arrangements: Additional overcollateralization may be provided to supplement the future contractual interest payments from securitized receivables with relatively low contractual interest rates.

·

Subordinated notes:  The subordination of principal and interest payments on subordinated notes may provide additional credit enhancement to holders of senior notes.

Subordinated notes: The subordination of principal and interest payments on subordinated notes may provide additional credit enhancement to holders of senior notes.

In addition to the credit enhancement described above, we may enter into interest rate swaps with our special purpose entities that issue variable rate debt. Under the terms of these swaps, the special purpose entities are obligated to pay TMCC a fixed rate of interest on payment dates in exchange for receiving a floating rate of interest on notional amounts equal to the outstanding balance of the secured debt.notes and loans payable. This arrangement enables the special purpose entities to mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in issuing variable rate debt that is secured by fixed rate Securitized Assets.

Securitized Assets and the related debt remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. We recognize financing revenue on the Securitized Assets. We also recognize interest expense on the secured debtnotes and loans payable issued by the special purpose entities and maintain an allowance for credit losses on the Securitized Assets to cover estimated probablelifetime expected credit losses using a methodology consistent with that used for our non-securitized asset portfolio. The interest rate swaps between TMCC and the special purpose entities are considered intercompany transactions and therefore are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements.


SecuritizationOur secured notes also include a revolving asset-backed securitization program, backed by a revolving pool of finance receivables and cash collateral. Cash flows from these receivables during the revolving period in excess of what is needed to pay certain expenses of the securitization trust and contractual interest payments on the related secured notes may be used to purchase additional receivables, provided that certain conditions are met following the purchase. The secured notes feature a scheduled revolving period, with the ability to repay the secured notes in full, after which an amortization period begins. The revolving period may also end with the amortization period beginning upon the occurrence of certain events that include certain segregated account balances falling below their required levels, credit losses or delinquencies on the pool of assets supporting the secured notes exceeding specified levels, the adjusted pool balance falling to less than 50% of the initial principal amount of the secured notes, or interest not being paid on the secured notes.

Public Securitization

We maintain a shelf registration statementsstatement with the SEC to provide for the issuance of securities backed by Securitized Assets in the U.S. capital markets.markets during the three-year period ending December 2024. We regularly sponsor public securitization trusts that issue securities backed by retail finance receivables, including registered securities that we retain.  Funding obtained from our public term securitization transactions is repaid as the underlying Securitized Assets amortize. None of these securities have defaulted, experienced any events of default or failed to pay principal in full at maturity. As of March 31, 20162023 and 2015,2022, we did not have any outstanding lease securitization transactions registered with the SEC.

We periodically enter into public term securitization transactions whereby we agree to use the proceeds solely to acquire retail and lease contracts financing new Toyota and Lexus vehicles50


Table of certain specified “green” models.  The terms of the securitization transaction are consistent with the terms of our other similar transactions except that the proceeds we receive are included in Restricted cash and cash equivalents in our Consolidated Balance Sheet, when applicable.Contents

We also regularly execute private securitization transactions of Securitized Assets with bank-sponsored multi-seller asset-backed conduits.  Funding obtained from our private securitization transactions is repaid as the underlying Securitized Assets amortize.

LiquidityCredit Facilities and Letters of Credit

For additional liquidity purposes, we maintain syndicated credit facilities, with certain banks.which may be used for general corporate purposes, as described below:

364 Day364-Day Credit Agreement, Three YearThree-Year Credit Agreement and Five YearFive-Year Credit Agreement

In November 2015, TMCC, Toyota Credit de Puerto Rico Corp. (“TCPR”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, and other Toyota affiliates entered intoare party to a $5.0 billion 364 day364-day syndicated bank credit facility, a $5.0 billion three yearthree-year syndicated bank credit facility, and a $5.0 billion five yearfive-year syndicated bank credit facility, expiring in fiscal 2017, 2019,2024, 2026, and 2021,2028, respectively.

The ability to make draws is subject to covenants and conditions customary in transactions of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions and limitations on certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. These agreements may be used for general corporate purposeswere not drawn upon and none were drawn uponhad no outstanding balances as of March 31, 2016.2023 and 2022. We are currently in compliance with the covenants and conditions of the credit agreements described above.

Committed Revolving Asset-backed Facility

We are party to a 364-day revolving securitization facility with certain bank-sponsored asset-backed conduits and other financial institutions expiring in fiscal 2024. Under the terms and subject to the conditions of this facility, the committed lenders under the facility have committed to make advances up to a facility limit of $8.0 billion backed by eligible retail finance receivables transferred by us to a special-purpose entity acting as borrower. We utilized $5.5 billion and $3.2 billion of this facility as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Other Unsecured Credit Agreements

TMCC has entered intois party to additional unsecured credit facilities with various banks. As of March 31, 2016,2023, TMCC had committed bank credit facilities totaling $5.3$4.6 billion of which $2.7$2.3 billion, $125$180 million, and $2.1 billion and $375 million mature in fiscal 2017, 2018, 2019,2024, 2025, and 2020,2026, respectively.

These credit agreements contain covenants and conditions customary in transactions of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions and limitations on certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. These credit facilities were not drawn upon and had no outstanding balances as of March 31, 20162023 and 2015.2022. We are currently in compliance with the covenants and conditions of the credit agreements described above.


TMCC is party to a $5.0 billion three-year revolving credit facility with TMS expiring in fiscal 2026. This credit facility was not drawn upon and had no outstanding balance as of March 31, 2023 and 2022.

From time to time, we may borrow from affiliates based upon a number of business factors such as funds availability, cash flow timing, relative cost of funds, and market access capabilities.


51


Table of Contents

Credit Ratings

The cost and availability of unsecured financing is influenced by credit ratings, which are intended to be an indicator of the creditworthiness of a particular company, security, or obligation. Lower ratings generally result in higher borrowing costs as well as reduced access to capital markets. Credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities, and are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning credit rating organization. Each credit rating organization may have different criteria for evaluating risk, and therefore ratings should be evaluated independently for each organization. Our credit ratings depend in part on the existence of the credit support agreements of TFSC and TMC. Refer to “Part 1,Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors - Our – “Our borrowing costs and access to the unsecured debt capital markets depend significantly on the credit ratings of TMCC and its parent companies and our credit support arrangements.”

Credit Support Agreements

Under the terms of a credit support agreement between TMC and TFSC, TMC has agreed to:

·

maintain 100 percent ownership of TFSC;

maintain 100 percent ownership of TFSC;

·

cause TFSC and its subsidiaries to have a tangible net worth (the aggregate amount of issued capital, capital surplus and retained earnings less any intangible assets) of at least JPY 10 million, equivalent to $88,834 at March 31, 2016; and

cause TFSC and its subsidiaries to have a tangible net worth (the aggregate amount of issued capital, capital surplus and retained earnings less any intangible assets) of at least JPY 10 million, equivalent to approximately $75 thousand at March 31, 2023; and

·

make sufficient funds available to TFSC so that TFSC will be able to (i) service the obligations arising out of its own bonds, debentures, notes and other investment securities and commercial paper and (ii) honor its obligations incurred as a result of guarantees or credit support agreements that it has extended (collectively, “Securities”).

make sufficient funds available to TFSC so that TFSC will be able to (i) service the obligations arising out of its own bonds, debentures, notes and other investment securities and commercial paper and (ii) honor its obligations incurred as a result of guarantees or credit support agreements that it has extended (collectively, “Securities”).

The agreement is not a guarantee by TMC of any securities or obligations of TFSC. TMC’s obligations under the credit support agreement rank pari passu with TMC’s senior unsecured debt obligations. Either party may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other party. However, such termination cannot take effect unless and until (1) all Securities issued on or prior to the date of the termination notice have been repaid or (2) each rating agency that has issued a rating in respect of TFSC or any Securities upon the request of TMC or TFSC has confirmed to TFSC that the debt ratings of all such Securities will be unaffected by such termination. In addition, with certain exceptions, the agreement may be modified only by the written agreement of TMC and TFSC, and no modification or amendment can have any adverse effect upon any holder of any Securities outstanding at the time of such modification or amendment. The agreement is governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of Japan.

Under the terms of a similar credit support agreement between TFSC and TMCC, TFSC has agreed to:

·

maintain 100 percent ownership of TMCC;

maintain 100 percent ownership of TMCC;

·

cause TMCC and its subsidiaries to have a tangible net worth (the aggregate amount of issued capital, capital surplus and retained earnings less any intangible assets) of at least $100,000; and

cause TMCC and its subsidiaries to have a tangible net worth (the aggregate amount of issued capital, capital surplus and retained earnings less any intangible assets) of at least $100,000; and

·

make sufficient funds available to TMCC so that TMCC will be able to service the obligations arising out of its own bonds, debentures, notes and other investment securities and commercial paper (collectively, “TMCC Securities”).

make sufficient funds available to TMCC so that TMCC will be able to service the obligations arising out of its own bonds, debentures, notes and other investment securities and commercial paper (collectively, “TMCC Securities”).

The agreement is not a guarantee by TFSC of any TMCC Securities. The agreement contains termination and modification provisions that are similar to those in the agreement between TMC and TFSC as described above. The agreement is governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of Japan. TMCC Securities do not include the securities issued by securitization trusts in connection with TMCC’s securitization programs or any indebtedness under TMCC’s credit facilities or term loan agreements.

Holders of TMCC Securities have the right to claim directly against TFSC and TMC to perform their respective obligations under the credit support agreements by making a written claim together with a declaration to the effect that the holder will have recourse to the rights given under the credit support agreements. If TFSC and/or TMC receivesreceive such a claim from any holder of TMCC Securities, TFSC and/or TMC shall indemnify, without any further action or formality, the holder against any loss or damage resulting from the failure of TFSC and/or TMC to perform any of their respective obligations under the credit support agreements. The holder of TMCC Securities who made the claim may then enforce the indemnity directly against TFSC and/or TMC.

In addition, TMCC and TFSC are parties to a credit support fee agreement which requires TMCC to pay to TFSC a fee which is based upon the weighted average outstanding amount of TMCC Securities entitled to credit support.

52



Table of Contents

TCPR is the beneficiary of a credit support agreement with TFSC containing the same provisions as the credit support agreement between TFSC and TMCC but pertaining to TCPR bonds, debentures, notes and other investment securities and commercial paper (collectively, “TCPR Securities”). Holders of TCPR Securities have the right to claim directly against TFSC and TMC to perform their respective obligations as described above. This agreement is not a guarantee by TFSC of any securities or other obligations of TCPR. TCPR has agreed to pay TFSC a fee which is based upon the weighted average outstanding amount of TCPR Securities entitled to credit support.

Derivative Instruments


DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Risk Management Strategy

Our liabilities consist mainly of fixed and floatingvariable rate debt, denominated in U.S dollars and various other currencies, which we issue in the global capital markets, while our assets consist primarily of U.S. dollar denominated, fixed rate receivables. We enter into interest rate swaps interest rate floors, interest rate caps and foreign currency swaps to economically hedge the interest rate and foreign currency risks that result from the different characteristics of our assets and liabilities. Our use of derivative transactions is intended to reduce long-term fluctuations in the fair value of assets and liabilities caused by market movements. All of our derivatives are categorized as not designated for hedge accounting, and all of our derivative activities are authorized and monitored by our management and our Asset-Liability Committee (“ALCO”) which provides a framework for financial controls and governance to manage market risk.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments

All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow us to net settle positive and negative positions and offset cash collateral held with the same counterparty on a net basis.  Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

We categorize derivatives as those designated for hedge accounting (“hedge accounting derivatives”) and those that are not designated for hedge accounting (“non-hedge accounting derivatives”).  At the inception of a derivative contract, we may elect to designate a derivative as a hedge accounting derivative.

We may also, from time-to-time, issue debt which can be characterized as hybrid financial instruments. These obligations often contain an embedded derivative which may require bifurcation.  Changes in the fair value of the bifurcated embedded derivative are reported in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, we had no outstanding embedded derivatives that are required to be bifurcated.  Refer to Note 16Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesDerivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.further discussion and disclosure on derivative instruments.

Derivative Assets

53


Table of Contents

LIBOR TRANSITION

While the most commonly used U.S. dollar LIBOR tenors will continue to be published until June 30, 2023, U.S. banking agencies issued guidance that financial institutions should cease using U.S. dollar LIBOR as a reference rate in new contracts after December 31, 2021. We are exposed to LIBOR-based financial instruments, including through our dealer financing activities, derivative contracts, secured and Liabilities

The following table summarizes our derivative assetsunsecured debt, and liabilities, which are included in Other assets and Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Gross derivatives assets, net of credit valuation adjustment

 

$

973

 

 

$

688

 

Less: Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

(905

)

 

 

(635

)

Derivative assets, net

 

$

68

 

 

$

53

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross derivative liabilities, net of credit valuation adjustment

 

$

1,310

 

 

$

2,274

 

Less: Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

(1,303

)

 

 

(2,184

)

Derivative liabilities, net

 

$

7

 

 

$

90

 

Collateral represents cash received or deposited under reciprocal arrangements thatinvestment securities. To facilitate an orderly transition from LIBOR to alternative reference rates (“ARRs”), we have established an initiative led by senior management, with Board and committee oversight, to assess, monitor and mitigate risks associated with the expected discontinuation of LIBOR, to achieve operational readiness and engage impacted borrowers and counterparties in connection with the transition to ARRs. Our efforts under this initiative include monitoring developments and the usage of ARRs, monitoring the regulatory and financial reporting guidance, as well as reviewing and updating current legal contracts, internal systems and processes to accommodate the use of ARRs.

We continue to make progress on our transition efforts, including transitioning various borrowing arrangements and derivative contracts to SOFR linked rates and updating various lending arrangements to Prime. We have not entered into with our derivative counterparties.  As of Marchnew contracts that use LIBOR as a reference rate after December 31, 2016, we held collateral of $320 million, which offset derivative assets, and posted collateral of $718 million, which offset derivative liabilities.  We also held excess collateral of $2 million which we did not use to offset derivative assets,2021, and we posted excess collateral of $22 million which we did not useare planning to offset derivative liabilities.  As of March 31, 2015, we held collateral of $145 million, which offset derivative assets, and we posted collateral of $1,694 million which offset derivative liabilities.  We held excess collateral of $10 million which we did not usetransition our remaining exposure to offset derivative assets, and we posted excess collateral of $2 million which we did not useARRs prior to offset derivative liabilities.  the June 30, 2023 LIBOR discontinuance date.

Refer to Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors – “The transition away from the “Interest Expense” sectionLondon Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and the adoption of alternative reference rates could adversely impact our business and results of operations” for discussion on changes in derivatives.further discussion.

54


Table of Contents


NEW ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE


Refer to OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Guarantees

TMCC has guaranteed the paymentsNote 1 – Basis of principalPresentation and interest with respect to the bond obligations that were issued by Putnam County, West Virginia and Gibson County, Indiana to finance the construction of pollution control facilities at manufacturing plants of certain TMCC affiliates.  TMCC would be required to perform under the guarantees in the event of non-payment on the bonds and other related obligations.  TMCC is entitled to reimbursement by the affiliates for any amounts paid.  TMCC receives an annual fee of $78 thousand for guaranteeing such payments.  Other than this fee, there are no corresponding expenses or cash flows arising from our guarantees.  The nature, business purpose, and amounts of these guarantees are described in Note 14 – Commitments and ContingenciesSignificant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CommitmentsCRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

We provide fixed and variable rate credit facilities to dealers and various multi-franchise organizations referred to as dealer groups.  These credit facilities are typically used for facilities refurbishment, real estate purchases, business acquisition, and working capital requirements.  These loans are typically securedThe preparation of financial statements in accordance with liens on real estate, vehicle inventory, and/or other dealership assets, as appropriate, and may be guaranteed by the individual or corporate guarantees of the affiliated dealers, dealer groups, or dealer principals when deemed prudent.  Although the loans are typically collateralized or guaranteed, the value of the underlying collateral or guarantees may not be sufficient to cover our exposure under such agreements.  Our pricing reflects market conditions, the competitive environment, the level of dealer support required for the facility and the credit worthiness of each dealer.  Amounts drawn under these facilities are reviewed for collectability on a quarterly basis, in conjunction with our evaluation of the allowance for credit losses.  We have also extended credit facilities to affiliates as described in Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Indemnification

Refer to Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of agreements containing indemnification provisions.  We have not made any material paymentsaccounting principles generally accepted in the past as a resultUnited States of these provisions, and as of March 31, 2016, we determined that it is not probable that we will be requiredAmerica (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make any material payments in the future.  As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, no amounts have been recorded under these indemnification provisions.


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND CREDIT-RELATED COMMITMENTS

We have certain obligations to make future payments under contracts and credit-related financial instruments and commitments.  Aggregate contractual obligations and credit-related commitments in existence at March 31, 2016 are summarized as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

 

Payments due by period

 

Contractual obligations

 

Total

 

 

Less than 1

year

 

 

1-3 years

 

 

3-5 years

 

 

More than 5

years

 

Debt 1

 

$

94,808

 

 

$

47,573

 

 

$

26,324

 

 

$

11,929

 

 

$

8,982

 

Estimated interest payments for debt 2

 

 

4,503

 

 

 

977

 

 

 

1,363

 

 

 

786

 

 

 

1,377

 

Estimated net receipts under interest rate

   swap agreements2

 

 

(1,269

)

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(135

)

 

 

(241

)

 

 

(873

)

Lending commitments 3

 

 

7,706

 

 

 

7,706

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Premises occupied under lease

 

 

55

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

1

 

Purchase obligations 4

 

 

6

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

105,809

 

 

$

56,264

 

 

$

27,578

 

 

$

12,480

 

 

$

9,487

 

1

Debt reflects the remaining principal obligation.  Our foreign currency debt is stated in USD at amounts representing our contractual obligations under the foreign currency swaps that are used to hedge the corresponding debt.  Excludes unamortized premium/discount of $150 million as well as foreign currency and fair value adjustments of $932 million.

2

Interest payments for debt and swap agreements payable in foreign currencies or based on variable interest rates are estimated using the applicable current rates as of March 31, 2016.

3

Lending commitments represent term loans and revolving lines of credit we extended to dealers and affiliates.  Of the amount shown above, $6.5 billion was outstanding as of March 31, 2016.  The amount shown above excludes $12.6 billion of wholesale financing lines not considered to be contractual commitments at March 31, 2016, ofestimates which $8.9 billion was outstanding at March 31, 2016.  The above lending commitments have various expiration dates.

4

Purchase obligations represent fixed or minimum payment obligations under supplier contracts.  The amounts included herein represent the minimum contractual obligations in certain situations; however, actual amounts incurred may be substantially higher depending on the particular circumstance, including in the case of information technology contracts, the amount of usage once we have implemented it.  Contracts that do not specify fixed payments or provide for a minimum payment are not included. The contracts noted herein contain voluntary provisions under which the contract may be terminated for a specified fee depending upon the contract.



NEW ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE

Refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

We have identified the estimates below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.  The impact and any associated risks related to these estimates on business operations are discussed throughout this report where such estimates affect reported and expected financial results. The evaluation of the factors used in determining each of our critical accounting estimates involves significant assumptions, complex analyses, and management judgment. Changes in the evaluation of these factors may significantlyhave a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements. Different assumptions or changesAdditionally, due to inherent uncertainties in economic circumstancesmaking estimates, actual results could resultdiffer from those estimates, and those differences could be material. The accounting estimates we consider to be critical are the following:

Accumulated depreciation on investment in additional changes tooperating leases; and
Allowance for credit losses

Accumulated Depreciation on Investment in Operating Leases

Accumulated depreciation on investment in operating leases reduces the determinationvalue of the allowance for credit losses,leased vehicles from their original value at acquisition to their expected market value at the determinationend of residual values, the valuation of our derivative instruments, the fair value of financial instruments, and our results of operations and financial condition.  Our other significant accounting policies are discussedlease term. Refer to Note 5 – Investments in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Operating Leases, Netof the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Determination of Residual Values

The determination of residual values on our lease portfolio involves estimating end-of-term market values of leased vehicles.  Establishing these estimates involves various assumptions, complex analyses, and management judgment.  Actual losses incurred at lease termination could be significantly different from expected losses.  ForStatements for further discussion and disclosure of the accounting treatment of residual values on our lease earning assets, refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.investment in operating leases, including accumulated depreciation.

Nature of Estimates and Assumptions Required

ResidualThe accumulated depreciation on investment in operating leases is based on assumptions of end-of-term market value of the leased vehicles and the number of vehicles that will be returned at maturity. At the inception of a lease, the residual values are estimated at lease inception by examining external industry data, the anticipated Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label product pipeline and our own experience. Factors considered in this evaluation include, but are not limited to, local, regional and national economic forecasts, new vehicle pricing, new vehicle incentive programs, new vehicle sales, future plans for new Toyota, Lexus and Scion product introductions, competitor actions and behavior, product attributes of popular vehicles, the mix and level of used vehicle supply, the level of current and projected used vehicle values, the actual or perceived quality, safety or reliability of Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicles, buying and leasing behavior trends, and fuel prices. We periodically review the estimated end-of-term market values of leased vehicles to assess the appropriateness of their carrying values.values on a quarterly basis. To the extent the estimated end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle is lower than the contractual residual value established at lease inception, the residual value of the leased vehicle is adjusted downward so that the carrying value at lease end will approximate the estimated end-of-term market value. Factors affecting the estimated end-of-term market value are similar to those considered in the evaluation of the contractual residual values at lease inception. These factors are evaluated in the context of their historical trends to anticipate potential changes in the relationship among those factors in the future.  For operating leases, adjustments are made on a straight-line basis over the remaining terms of the leases and are included in Depreciation on operating leases in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  For direct finance leases, adjustments are made at the time of assessment and are recorded as a reduction of direct finance lease revenues, which is included under our Retail revenues in the Consolidated Statement of Income.



Sensitivity Analysis

Estimated return rates and end-of-term market values represent two of the key assumptions involved in determining the amount and timing of depreciation expense to be recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The vehicle lease return rate represents the number of end-of-term leased vehicles returned to us for sale as a percentage of lease contracts that were originally scheduled to mature in the same period less certain qualified early terminations. When the market value of a leased vehicle at contract maturity is less than its contractual residual value (i.e., the price at which the lease customer may purchase the leased vehicle), there is a higher probability that the vehicle will be returned to us.returned. In addition, a higher market supply of certain models of used vehicles generally results in a lower relative level of demand for those vehicles, resulting in a higher probability that the vehicle will be returned to us.  A higher rate of vehicle returns exposes us to greater risk of loss at lease termination.  returned.

Sensitivity Analysis

At March 31, 2016,2023, holding other estimates constant, if end-of-term market values for returned units were to decrease by one percent from our present estimates, the effect would be to increase depreciation expense by approximately $83 million. If the forecasted end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle is less than the contractual residual value, additional depreciation expense is recorded.

At March 31, 2023, holding other estimates constant, if the return rate for our existing lease portfolio of leased vehicles were to increase by one percentage point from our present estimates, the effect would be to increase depreciation on these vehiclesexpense by approximately $23$15 million. This increase in depreciation would be charged to Depreciation on operating leases in the Consolidated Statement of IncomeAdjustments are made on a straight-line basis over the remaining terms of the leases and are included in Investment in operating leases.

End-of-term market values determine the amount of loss severity at lease maturity.  Loss severity is the extent to which the end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle is less than the estimated residual value.  We may incur losses to the extent the end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle is less than the estimated residual value.  At March 31, 2016, holding other estimates constant, if end-of-term market values for returned units of leased vehicles were to decrease by one percent fromleases, net on our present estimates, the effect would be to increase depreciation on these vehicles by approximately $94 million.  This increaseConsolidated Balance Sheets and in depreciation would be charged to Depreciation on operating leases in theour Consolidated StatementStatements of Income on a straight-line basis over the remaining termsIncome.

55


Table of the operating leases.Contents

Determination of the Allowance for Credit Losses

We maintain an allowance for credit losses to cover probable and estimablelifetime expected credit losses as of the balance sheet date on our earning assets resulting from the failure of customers or dealers to make required payments. The level of consumer credit losses is influenced by two factors: default frequency and loss severity.  For evaluation purposes, exposures to credit losses are segmented into the two primary categories of “consumer”“retail loan” and “dealer”. Our consumerretail loan portfolio consists, for accounting purposes, of our retail loan portfolio segment and our investment in operating leases portfolio, both of which areis characterized by smaller contract balances than our dealer portfolio. Our dealer portfolio consists, for accounting purposes, of our dealer products portfolio segment. The overall allowance is evaluated at least quarterly, considering a variety of assumptions and factors to determine whether reservesallowances are considered adequate to cover probable and estimablelifetime expected credit losses as of the balance sheet date. For further discussion of the accounting treatment of our allowanceRefer to Note 4 – Allowance for credit losses, refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesCredit Losses of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements for further discussion and disclosure of our allowance for credit losses.

NatureRetail Loan Portfolio

The level of Estimatescredit risk for the retail loan portfolio is influenced by various factors such as economic conditions, the used vehicle market, credit quality, contract structure, and Assumptions Required

collection strategies and practices. The evaluation of the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective basis when loans have similar risk characteristics such as loan-to-value ratio, book payment-to-income ratio, FICO score at origination, collateral type, contract term, and our exposureother relevant factors. We use statistical models to estimate lifetime expected credit losses involves estimatesof our retail loan portfolio segment by applying probability of default and requires significant judgment.

Consumer Portfolio

The consumer portfolio is evaluated using methodologiesloss given default to the exposure at default on a loan level basis. Probability of default models are developed from internal risk scoring models which consider variables such as roll rate,delinquency status, historical default frequency, and other credit quality indicators such as loan-to-value ratio, book payment to income ratio, FICO score at origination, collateral type (new or used, Lexus, Toyota, or private label), and contract term. Loss given default models forecast the extent of losses given that a default has occurred and considers variables such as collateral, trends in recoveries, historical loss severity, and other contract structure variables. Exposure at default represents the expected outstanding principal balance, including the effects of expected prepayment when applicable. The lifetime expected credit losses incorporate the probability-weighted forward-looking macroeconomic forecasts for baseline, favorable, and adverse scenarios. The loan lifetime is regarded by management as the reasonable and supportable period. We use macroeconomic forecasts from a third party and update such forecasts quarterly. On an ongoing basis, we review our models, including macroeconomic factors, the selection of macroeconomic scenarios and their weighting to ensure they reflect the risk of the portfolio.

If management does not believe the models reflect lifetime expected credit losses, a qualitative adjustment is made to reflect management judgment regarding observable changes in recent or expected economic trends and conditions, portfolio composition, and other relevant factors.

Dealer Portfolio

The level of credit risk grade/tier, and vintage analysis.  We review and analyze external factors, such as changes in economic conditions, actual or perceived quality, safety and reliability of Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles, unemployment levels, the used vehicle market, and consumer behavior.  In addition, internal factors, such as purchase quality mix and operational changes are considered in the review.  The majority of our credit losses are related to our consumer portfolio.

Dealer Portfolio

We evaluate the dealer portfolio is influenced primarily by aggregatingthe financial strength of dealers within our portfolio, dealer financingconcentration, collateral quality, and other economic factors. The financial strength of dealers within our portfolio is influenced by, among other factors, general economic conditions, the overall demand for new and used vehicles and the financial condition of automotive manufacturers. The allowance for credit losses is established for both outstanding dealer finance receivables into loan-risk pools, which are determinedand certain unfunded off-balance sheet lending commitments. The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective basis when loans have similar risk characteristics such as dealer group internal risk rating and loan-to-value ratios. We measure lifetime expected credit losses of our dealer products portfolio segment by applying probability of default and loss given default to the exposure at default on a loan level basis. Probability of default is primarily established based on internal risk assessments. The probability of default model also considers qualitative factors related to macroeconomic outlooks. Loss given default is established based on the risk characteristicsnature and market value of the collateral, loan-to-value ratios and other credit quality indicators. Exposure at default represents the expected outstanding principal balance. The lifetime of the loan (e.g., whetheror lending commitment is regarded by management as the loanreasonable and supportable period. On an ongoing basis, we review our models, including macroeconomic outlooks, to ensure they reflect the risk of the portfolio.

If management does not believe the models reflect lifetime expected credit losses, a qualitative adjustment is secured by vehicle inventory, real estate,made to reflect management judgment regarding observable changes in recent or dealership assets).  We analyze the loan-risk pools using internally developed risk ratings for each dealer.  In addition, field operations managementexpected economic trends and our special assets group are consulted each quarter to determine if any specific dealer loan is considered impaired.  If impaired loans are identified, specific reserves are established as appropriate,conditions, portfolio composition, and the loan is removed from the loan-risk pool for separate monitoring.other relevant factors.

56



Table of Contents

Sensitivity Analysis

The assumptions used in evaluating our exposure to credit losses involve estimates and significant judgment. The expected loss severity and default frequency on the consumer portfolio represent twomajority of the key assumptions involved in determining the allowance forour credit losses.losses are related to our retail loan portfolio. Holding other estimates constant, a 10 percent increase or decrease in either the estimatedassumptions used to derive probability of default and loss severity or the estimatedgiven default frequency on the consumer portfolio would have resulted in a change in the allowance for credit losses of $40$143 million as of March 31, 2016.2023.

Valuation57


Table of Derivative InstrumentsContents

We manage our exposure to market risks such as interest rate and foreign currency risks with derivative instruments.  These instruments include interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps, interest rate floors, and interest rate caps.  Our use of derivatives is limited to the management of interest rate and foreign currency risks.  For further discussion of the accounting treatment of our derivatives, refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Nature of Estimates and Assumptions Required

We determine the application of derivatives accounting through the identification of hedging instruments, hedged items, and the nature of the risk being hedged, as well as the methodology used to assess the hedging instrument's effectiveness.  The fair values of our over-the-counter derivative assets and liabilities are determined using quantitative models that require the use of multiple market inputs including interest and foreign exchange rates, prices and indices to generate yield or pricing curves and volatility factors, which are used to value the position.  Market inputs are validated through external sources, including brokers, market transactions and third-party pricing services.  Estimation risk is greater for derivative asset and liability positions that are either option-based or have longer maturity dates where observable market inputs are less readily available or are unobservable, in which case quantitative based extrapolations of rate, price or index scenarios are used in determining fair values.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

A portion of our assets and liabilities is carried at fair value, including cash equivalents, available-for-sale securities and derivatives.

Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available.  If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use as inputs market-based or independently sourced market parameters.  We ensure that all applicable inputs are appropriately calibrated to market data, including but not limited to yield curves, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates.  In addition to market information, the models also incorporate transaction details, such as maturity.  Fair value adjustments, including those made for credit (counterparties and TMCC), liquidity, and input parameter uncertainty are included, as appropriate, to the model value to arrive at a fair value measurement.

During fiscal 2016, no material changes were made to the valuation models. For the definition of fair value, a description of the assets and liabilities carried at fair value, and the controls over valuation, refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.  



ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVEQUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

MARKET RISK

Market risk is the sensitivity of our financial instruments to changes in market prices, interest and foreign exchange rates.  Market risk is inherent in the financial instruments associated with our operations, including debt, cash equivalents, available-for-sale securities, finance receivables and derivatives.  Our business and global capital market activities give rise to market sensitive assets and liabilities. This sensitivity is considered market risk and is caused by changes in market prices of our financial instruments on the balance sheet which is driven by various market factors such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, and other market driven factors. Market risk is inherent in the financial instruments associated with our operations such as cash equivalents, finance receivables, debt and equity securities, debt, and derivatives.

ALCO is responsible for the execution of our market risk management strategies and their activities are governed by written policies and procedures. The principal objective of asset and liability management is to manage the sensitivity of net interest margin to changing interest rates. When evaluating risk management strategies, we consider a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, management’s risk tolerance, market conditions and portfolio composition.

We manage our exposure to certain market risks through our regular operating and financing activities and when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative instruments. These instruments are used to manage underlying exposures; we do not use derivatives for trading, market making or speculative purposes. Refer to “Derivative Instruments” within Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operationsfor information on risk management strategies, corporate governance and derivatives usage.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk can result from timing differences in the maturity or re-pricing of assets and liabilities. Changes in the level and volatility of market interest rate curves also create interest rate risk as the re-pricing of assets and liabilities are a function of implied forward interest rates. We are also exposed to basis risk, which is the difference in re-pricing characteristics of two floating rate indices.

We use sensitivity simulations to assess and manage interest rate risk. Our simulations allow us to analyze the sensitivity of our existing portfolio as well as the expected sensitivity of our new business. We measure the potential volatility in our net interest cash flowsmargin and manage our interest rate risk by assessing the dollar impact given a 100 basis100-basis point increase or decrease in the implied yield curve. We have established risk limits to monitor and control our exposures. ALCO reviews the amount at risk and prescribes steps, if needed, to mitigate our exposure. Our current exposure is considered within tolerable limits.

Sensitivity Model Assumptions

Interest rate scenarios were derived from implied forward curves based on market expectations. Internal and external data sources were used for the reinvestment of maturing assets, refinancing of maturing debt and replacement of maturing derivatives. The prepayment of retail and lease contracts was based on our historical experience and attrition projections, voluntary or involuntary. We monitor our balance sheet positions, economic trends and market conditions, internal forecasts and expected business growth in an effort to maintain the reasonableness of the sensitivity model.

The table below reflects the potential 12-month change in pre-tax cash flows based on hypothetical movements in future market interest rates. The sensitivity analysis assumes instantaneous, parallel shifts in interest rate yield curves. These interest rate scenarios do not represent management’s view of future interest rate movements. In reality, interest rate movements are rarely instantaneous or parallel and rates could move more or less than the rate scenarios reflected in the table below. In situations where existing interest rates are below one percent, the assumption of a 100 basis100-basis point decrease in interest rates is subject to a floor of zero percent, which is reflected in the “-100bp” scenario for both March 31, 20162023 and 2015.2022.

Sensitivity analysis

 

Immediate change in rates

 

 

Immediate change in rates

 

(in millions)

 

+100bp

 

 

-100bp

 

 

+100bp

 

 

-100bp

 

March 31, 2016

 

$

11.1

 

 

$

(11.3

)

March 31, 2015

 

$

(3.1

)

 

$

(45.2

)

March 31, 2023

 

$

(1.8

)

 

$

2.8

 

March 31, 2022

 

$

56.1

 

 

$

(38.4

)

Our net interest cash flow sensitivity results from the “+100bp” scenario show a slightly asset-sensitiveliability sensitive position on March 31, 20162023 and a slightly liability-sensitiveasset sensitive position on March 31, 2015.2022. We regularly assess the viability of our business and hedging strategies to reduce unacceptable risks to earnings and implement such strategies to protect our net interest margins from the potential negative effects of changes in interest rates.  We have established risk limits to monitor and control our exposures.  Our current exposure is considered within tolerable limits.

58



Table of Contents

Foreign currency riskCurrency Risk

Foreign currency risk represents exposure to changes in the values of our current holdings and future cash flows denominated in other currencies. To meet our funding objectives, we issue fixed and floatingvariable rate debt denominated in a number of different currencies. Our policy is to minimize exposures to changes in foreign exchange rates. Currency exposure related to foreign currency debt is economically hedged at issuance through the execution of foreign currency swaps which effectively convert our obligations on foreign denominated debt into U.S. dollar denominated 3-month LIBOR or SOFR based payments. As a result, our economic exposure to foreign currency risk is minimized.

Our debt is accounted for at amortized cost in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We may elect to designate our debt in hedge accounting relationships for changes in interest rate risk, foreign currency risk or both. If our debt is hedged in a fair value hedge accounting relationship, we adjust the carrying value of our debt to reflect changes in the fair value attributable to interest and foreign currency risks with an offsetting amount recorded in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  If the debt is not in a hedge accounting relationship, the debt is translated into U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate at the transaction date and retranslated at each balance sheet date using the exchange rate in effect at that date.   Additionally, we also recognize changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Certain fixed income mutual fundsequity investments in our investment securities portfolio are exposed to foreign currency risk. The fundsequity investments may invest directly in foreign currencies, in securities that trade in and receive revenues in foreign currencies, or in financial derivatives that provide exposure to foreign currencies. The fundsequity investments may also enter into foreign currency derivative contracts to hedge the currency exposure associated with some or all of the fund’sequity investments’ securities. The market value of these holdings is translated into U.S. dollars based on the current exchange rates each business day. The effect of changes in foreign currency on our portfolio is reflected in the net asset value of the fund.equity investment.



Derivative Counterparty Credit Risk

We manage derivative counterparty credit risk by maintaining policies for entering into derivative contracts, exercising our rights under our derivative contracts, requiring the posting of collateral and actively monitoring our exposure to counterparties.

All of our derivativesderivative counterparties to which we had credit exposure at March 31, 20162023 were assigned investment grade ratings by a credit rating organization. Our counterparty credit risk could be adversely affected by deterioration of the global economy and financial distress in the banking industry.

Our International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”)ISDA Master Agreements permit multiple transactions to be cancelled and settled with a single net balance paid to either party in the event of default or other termination event outside the normal course of business, such as a ratings downgrade of either party to the contract. These ISDA Master Agreements also contain reciprocal collateral arrangements which help mitigate our exposure to the credit risk associated with our counterparties. As of March 31, 2016,2023, we have daily valuation and collateral exchange arrangements with all of our counterparties. Our collateral agreements with substantially all our counterparties include a zero threshold, full collateralization requirement, which has significantly reduced counterparty credit risk exposure. Under our ISDA Master Agreements, cash is the only permissible form of collateral. Neither we nor our counterparties are required to hold collateral in a segregated account. OurUpon default, the collateral agreement grants the party in a net asset position the right to set-off amounts receivable against any posted collateral.

We also enter into centrally cleared derivatives which are subject to master netting agreements include legal rightand perform valuation and margin exchange on a daily basis.

59


Table of offset provisions, pursuant to which collateral amounts are netted against derivative assets or derivative liabilities, the net amount of which is included in Other assets or Other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.Contents

In addition, many of our ISDA Master Agreements contain reciprocal ratings triggers providing either party with an option to terminate the agreement and related transactions at market value in the event of a ratings downgrade below a specified threshold.  Refer to “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” for further discussion.

A summary of our net counterparty credit exposure by credit rating (net of collateral held) is presented below:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Credit Rating

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AA

 

$

2

 

 

$

-

 

A

 

 

63

 

 

 

54

 

BBB

 

 

5

 

 

 

-

 

Total net counterparty credit exposure

 

$

70

 

 

$

54

 

We exclude from the table above credit valuation adjustments of $2 million and $1 million at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to non-performance risk of our counterparties. All derivative credit valuation adjustments are recorded in Interest expense in our Consolidated Statement of Income.  Refer to Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.



Issuer Credit Risk

Issuer credit risk represents exposures to changes in the creditworthiness of individual issuers or groups of issuers. Changes in economic conditions may expose us to issuer credit risk where the value of an asset may be adversely impacted by changes in the levels of credit spreads, by credit migration, or by defaults.

The following tables summarize our fixed income holdinginvestments in marketable securities distribution by credit rating as of:

 

March 31, 2023

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distribution by credit rating

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distribution by credit rating

 

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BB

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Amortized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BB

 

 

cost

 

 

value

 

 

AAA

 

 

AA

 

 

A

 

 

BBB

 

 

or below

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

cost

 

 

value

 

 

AAA

 

 

AA

 

 

A

 

 

BBB

 

 

or below

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

$

2,833

 

 

$

2,835

 

 

$

2,688

 

 

$

147

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

796

 

 

$

744

 

 

$

744

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Foreign government and agency obligations

 

 

14

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

5

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

10

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

500

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

325

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Commercial paper

 

 

50

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

482

 

 

 

487

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

181

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

487

 

 

 

430

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

249

 

 

 

51

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

101

 

 

 

104

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

38

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

7

 

Total available-for-sale
debt securities:

 

$

1,584

 

 

$

1,454

 

 

$

896

 

 

$

36

 

 

$

172

 

 

$

281

 

 

$

69

 

Fixed income mutual funds

 

 

2,097

 

 

 

2,127

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,190

 

 

 

645

 

 

 

226

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,712

 

 

$

242

 

 

$

471

 

 

$

1,175

 

 

$

815

 

 

$

9

 

Total

 

$

6,111

 

 

$

6,151

 

 

$

2,709

 

 

$

1,974

 

 

$

1,035

 

 

$

355

 

 

$

78

 

 

 

 

$

4,166

 

 

$

1,138

 

 

$

507

 

 

$

1,347

 

 

$

1,096

 

 

$

78

 

 

March 31, 2022

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distribution by credit rating

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distribution by credit rating

 

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BB

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Amortized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BB

 

 

cost

 

 

value

 

 

AAA

 

 

AA

 

 

A

 

 

BBB

 

 

or below

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

cost

 

 

value

 

 

AAA

 

 

AA

 

 

A

 

 

BBB

 

 

or below

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

$

4,357

 

 

$

4,359

 

 

$

4,230

 

 

$

129

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

538

 

 

$

509

 

 

$

509

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Foreign government and agency obligations

 

 

26

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

10

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

10

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

175

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Commercial paper

 

 

37

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

138

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

598

 

 

 

568

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

101

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

103

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

19

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

39

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

6

 

Total available-for-sale debt securities:

 

$

1,372

 

 

$

1,304

 

 

$

594

 

 

$

44

 

 

$

197

 

 

$

333

 

 

$

136

 

Fixed income mutual funds

 

 

1,726

 

 

 

1,797

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,294

 

 

 

376

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,713

 

 

$

1,462

 

 

$

218

 

 

$

154

 

 

$

819

 

 

$

60

 

Total

 

$

6,585

 

 

$

6,671

 

 

$

4,254

 

 

$

1,716

 

 

$

462

 

 

$

223

 

 

$

16

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,017

 

 

$

2,056

 

 

$

262

 

 

$

351

 

 

$

1,152

 

 

$

196

 


60



Table of Contents

Equity Price Risk

We are exposed to equity price risk related to our investments in equity mutual funds included in our investment portfolio. These investments, classified as available-for-sale inon our Consolidated Balance Sheet, consist of passively managed mutual funds that are designed to track the performance of major equity market indices. Fair market values of the equity investments are determined using a net asset value that is quoted in an active market.

We utilize the Value at Risk (“VaR”) methodology to simulate the potential loss in fair value of our investment portfolio due to adverse market movements. The model is based on historical data for the previous two years assuming a 30-day holding period of 30 business days and a loss methodology approximating a 99 percent confidence interval.

The table below shows the VaR, excluding taxation impact, of our equity investment portfolio as of and for the periodsperiod ending:

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2023

 

Average

 

$

46

 

 

$

53

 

 

$

112

 

Minimum

 

$

39

 

 

$

52

 

 

$

65

 

Maximum

 

$

51

 

 

$

56

 

 

$

124

 

These hypothetical scenarios, derived from historical market price fluctuations, represent an estimate of reasonably possible net losses and are not necessarily indicative of actual results that may occur. Additionally, the hypothetical scenarios do not represent the maximum possible loss or any expected loss that may occur, since actual future gains and losses will differ from estimates.

61


Table of Contents


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation:

In our opinion,Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidatedbalance sheetsheets of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholder’s equity and cash flowsfor each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2023, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidatedfinancial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) atthe Companyas of March 31, 20162023 and March 31, 2015,2022, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2016 2023in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for credit losses in fiscal year 2021.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits of these consolidatedfinancial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  Anmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit includesof its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidatedfinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidatedfinancial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidatedfinancial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPCritical Audit Matters

Los Angeles, CaliforniaThe critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Retail Loan Portfolio Allowance for Credit Losses

As described in Notes 3 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company had retail loans of $79,646 million for which an allowance for credit losses of $1,430 million was recorded as of March 31, 2023. The allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the expected lifetime of the loans. The loan lifetime is regarded by management as the reasonable and supportable period. Management uses statistical models to estimate lifetime expected credit losses of the retail loan portfolio by applying probability of default and loss given default to the exposure at default on a loan level basis. Probability of default models are

62


Table of Contents

developed from internal risk scoring models which consider variables such as delinquency status, historical default frequency and other credit quality indicators such as loan-to-value ratio, book payment-to-income ratio, FICO score at origination, collateral type, and contract term. Loss given default models forecast the extent of losses given that a default has occurred and consider variables such as collateral, trends in recoveries, historical loss severity and other contract structure variables. Exposure at default represents the expected outstanding principal balance, including the effects of expected prepayment when applicable. The lifetime expected credit losses incorporate the probability weighted forward looking macroeconomic forecasts for baseline, favorable, and adverse scenarios. If management does not believe the models reflect lifetime expected credit losses, a qualitative adjustment is made to reflect management judgment regarding observable changes in recent or expected economic trends and conditions, portfolio composition, and other relevant factors.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the retail loan portfolio allowance for credit losses is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management in determining the estimate of the retail loan portfolio allowance for credit losses, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence relating to probability of default and loss given default assumptions and the qualitative adjustment used in estimating the allowance for credit losses, and (ii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for estimating the retail loan portfolio allowance for credit losses by (i) evaluating the appropriateness of the models used to estimate the retail loan portfolio allowance for credit losses, (ii) testing certain data used in the estimate, and (iii) evaluating the reasonableness of probability of default and loss given default assumptions and the qualitative adjustment, which also involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to perform these procedures to test management’s process.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, Texas

June 2, 20162023

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1983.

63


Table of Contents


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Financing revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease

 

$

7,141

 

 

$

6,113

 

 

$

5,068

 

 

$

7,063

 

 

$

8,337

 

 

$

8,481

 

Retail

 

 

1,859

 

 

 

1,797

 

 

 

1,897

 

 

 

3,737

 

 

 

3,254

 

 

 

2,905

 

Dealer

 

 

403

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

432

 

 

 

493

 

 

 

329

 

 

 

413

 

Total financing revenues

 

 

9,403

 

 

 

8,310

 

 

 

7,397

 

 

 

11,293

 

 

 

11,920

 

 

 

11,799

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

5,914

 

 

 

4,857

 

 

 

4,012

 

 

 

5,122

 

 

 

5,846

 

 

 

5,932

 

Interest expense

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

736

 

 

 

1,340

 

 

 

3,054

 

 

 

1,401

 

 

 

2,302

 

Net financing revenues

 

 

2,352

 

 

 

2,717

 

 

 

2,045

 

 

 

3,117

 

 

 

4,673

 

 

 

3,565

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance earned premiums and contract revenues

 

 

719

 

 

 

638

 

 

 

567

 

Gain on sale of commercial finance business

 

 

197

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Investment and other income, net

 

 

164

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

135

 

Voluntary protection contract revenues and
insurance earned premiums

 

 

1,053

 

 

 

1,015

 

 

 

956

 

Investment and other income (loss), net

 

 

97

 

 

 

(26

)

 

 

410

 

Net financing revenues and other revenues

 

 

3,432

 

 

 

3,549

 

 

 

2,747

 

 

 

4,267

 

 

 

5,662

 

 

 

4,931

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

441

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

170

 

 

 

713

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

426

 

Operating and administrative

 

 

1,161

 

 

 

1,046

 

 

 

965

 

 

 

1,776

 

 

 

1,697

 

 

 

1,487

 

Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses

 

 

318

 

 

 

269

 

 

 

258

 

Voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses

 

 

470

 

 

 

405

 

 

 

369

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,920

 

 

 

1,623

 

 

 

1,393

 

 

 

2,959

 

 

 

2,338

 

 

 

2,282

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

1,512

 

 

 

1,926

 

 

 

1,354

 

 

 

1,308

 

 

 

3,324

 

 

 

2,649

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

580

 

 

 

729

 

 

 

497

 

 

 

329

 

 

 

789

 

 

 

632

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

932

 

 

$

1,197

 

 

$

857

 

 

$

979

 

 

$

2,535

 

 

$

2,017

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net income

 

$

932

 

 

$

1,197

 

 

$

857

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale

   marketable securities [net of tax benefit (provision) of

   $32, ($38) and $5, respectively]

 

 

(51

)

 

 

64

 

 

 

(11

)

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on

   available-for-sale marketable securities

   included in investment and other income, net [net of

   tax provision of $2, $26 and $0, respectively]

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(44

)

 

 

-

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(55

)

 

 

20

 

 

 

(11

)

Comprehensive income

 

$

877

 

 

$

1,217

 

 

$

846

 

See(Dollars in millions)

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Net income

 

$

979

 

 

$

2,535

 

 

$

2,017

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale
   marketable securities [net of tax benefit (provision)
   of $
10, $8 and ($2), respectively]

 

 

(37

)

 

 

(28

)

 

 

9

 

Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) on
   available-for-sale marketable securities included in
   investment and other income, net [net of tax
     provision of $
0, $0 and $5, respectively]

 

 

1

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(16

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

(36

)

 

 

(29

)

 

 

(7

)

Comprehensive income

 

$

943

 

 

$

2,506

 

 

$

2,010

 

Refer to the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

64


Table of Contents


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSHEETS

(Dollars in millions)millions except share data)

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

2,701

 

 

$

2,407

 

 

$

6,398

 

 

$

7,670

 

Restricted cash

 

 

1,010

 

 

 

784

 

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

 

 

2,090

 

 

 

2,065

 

Investments in marketable securities

 

 

6,540

 

 

 

7,131

 

 

 

5,037

 

 

 

4,953

 

Finance receivables, net

 

 

65,636

 

 

 

65,893

 

Finance receivables, net of allowance for credit losses of $1,489 and $1,246, respectively

 

 

90,280

 

 

 

82,432

 

Investments in operating leases, net

 

 

36,488

 

 

 

31,128

 

 

 

29,869

 

 

 

35,455

 

Other assets

 

 

2,348

 

 

 

2,282

 

 

 

3,921

 

 

 

2,466

 

Total assets

 

$

114,723

 

 

$

109,625

 

 

$

137,595

 

 

$

135,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt

 

$

93,725

 

 

$

90,231

 

 

$

111,685

 

 

$

109,152

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

8,016

 

 

 

7,519

 

 

 

3,727

 

 

 

1,564

 

Other liabilities

 

 

3,585

 

 

 

3,355

 

 

 

5,674

 

 

 

6,224

 

Total liabilities

 

 

105,326

 

 

 

101,105

 

 

 

121,086

 

 

 

116,940

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder’s equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital stock, no par value (100,000 shares authorized; 91,500 issued

and outstanding) at March 31, 2016 and 2015

 

 

915

 

 

 

915

 

Capital stock, no par value (100,000 shares authorized; 91,500 issued
and outstanding) at March 31, 2023 and 2022

 

 

915

 

 

 

915

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

165

 

 

 

220

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(57

)

 

 

(21

)

Retained earnings

 

 

8,315

 

 

 

7,383

 

 

 

15,649

 

 

 

17,205

 

Total shareholder's equity

 

 

9,397

 

 

 

8,520

 

 

 

16,509

 

 

 

18,101

 

Total liabilities and shareholder's equity

 

$

114,723

 

 

$

109,625

 

 

$

137,595

 

 

$

135,041

 

The following table presents the assets and liabilities of our consolidated variable interest entities.  (See entities (Refer to Note 10)8).

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables, net

 

$

14,130

 

 

$

11,509

 

 

$

28,764

 

 

$

20,932

 

Investments in operating leases, net

 

 

2,504

 

 

 

1,193

 

 

 

11,063

 

 

 

11,886

 

Other assets

 

 

84

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

66

 

Total assets

 

$

16,718

 

 

$

12,717

 

 

$

39,935

 

 

$

32,884

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt

 

$

14,139

 

 

$

10,837

 

 

$

32,736

 

 

$

26,864

 

Other liabilities

 

 

5

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

10

 

Total liabilities

 

$

14,144

 

 

$

10,840

 

 

$

32,787

 

 

$

26,874

 

SeeRefer to the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

65


Table of Contents


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

 

paid-in

 

 

comprehensive

 

 

Retained

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

stock

 

 

capital

 

 

income

 

 

earnings

 

 

Total

 

Balance at March 31, 2013

 

$

915

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

211

 

 

$

6,429

 

 

$

7,557

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year ended March 31, 2014

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

857

 

 

 

857

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(11

)

Dividends

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(665

)

 

 

(665

)

Balance at March 31, 2014

 

$

915

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

200

 

 

$

6,621

 

 

$

7,738

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year ended March 31, 2015

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,197

 

 

 

1,197

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

20

 

Dividends

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(435

)

 

 

(435

)

Balance at March 31, 2015

 

$

915

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

220

 

 

$

7,383

 

 

$

8,520

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year ended March 31, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

932

 

 

 

932

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(55

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(55

)

Balance at March 31, 2016

 

$

915

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

165

 

 

$

8,315

 

 

$

9,397

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

 

paid-in

 

 

comprehensive

 

 

Retained

 

 

 

 

 

 

stock

 

 

capital

 

 

income (loss)

 

 

earnings

 

 

Total

 

Balance at March 31, 2020

 

$

915

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

13,571

 

 

$

14,503

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative-effect of adoption of ASU 2016-13

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(218

)

 

 

(218

)

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,017

 

 

 

2,017

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(7

)

Dividends

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(700

)

 

 

(700

)

Balance at March 31, 2021

 

$

915

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

8

 

 

$

14,670

 

 

$

15,595

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,535

 

 

 

2,535

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(29

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(29

)

Balance at March 31, 2022

 

$

915

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

(21

)

 

$

17,205

 

 

$

18,101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

979

 

 

 

979

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(36

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(36

)

Dividends

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2,535

)

 

 

(2,535

)

Balance at March 31, 2023

 

$

915

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

(57

)

 

$

15,649

 

 

$

16,509

 

SeeRefer to the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

66


Table of Contents


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014¹

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

932

 

 

$

1,197

 

 

$

857

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating

   activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

5,965

 

 

 

4,895

 

 

 

4,045

 

Recognition of deferred income

 

 

(1,713

)

 

 

(1,539

)

 

 

(1,278

)

Provision for credit losses

 

 

441

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

170

 

Amortization of deferred costs

 

 

672

 

 

 

628

 

 

 

589

 

Foreign currency and other adjustments to the carrying value of debt, net

 

 

1,143

 

 

 

(2,380

)

 

 

(205

)

Net realized gains from sales and other-than-temporary impairment on

   securities

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(70

)

 

 

-

 

Gain on sale of commercial finance business

 

 

(197

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Net change in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(226

)

 

 

(140

)

 

 

(153

)

Derivative assets

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

9

 

Other assets (Note 8) and accrued interest

 

 

66

 

 

 

(350

)

 

 

87

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

531

 

 

 

760

 

 

 

516

 

Derivative liabilities

 

 

(83

)

 

 

84

 

 

 

(11

)

Other liabilities

 

 

329

 

 

 

378

 

 

 

248

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

7,839

 

 

 

3,767

 

 

 

4,874

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of investments in marketable securities

 

 

(7,447

)

 

 

(6,164

)

 

 

(5,114

)

Proceeds from sales of investments in marketable securities

 

 

914

 

 

 

991

 

 

 

596

 

Proceeds from maturities of investments in marketable securities

 

 

7,026

 

 

 

3,529

 

 

 

4,510

 

Acquisition of finance receivables

 

 

(24,956

)

 

 

(25,584

)

 

 

(25,790

)

Collection of finance receivables

 

 

24,523

 

 

 

24,602

 

 

 

23,961

 

Net change in wholesale and certain working capital receivables

 

 

(512

)

 

 

222

 

 

 

(804

)

Acquisition of investments in operating leases

 

 

(19,917

)

 

 

(16,969

)

 

 

(14,410

)

Disposals of investments in operating leases

 

 

8,283

 

 

 

6,444

 

 

 

6,636

 

Proceeds from sale of commercial finance business

 

 

2,317

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Net change in financing support provided to affiliates

 

 

7

 

 

 

(12

)

 

 

(241

)

Cash equivalents un-restricted (restricted) to acquire finance

   receivables and investment in operating leases, net

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,077

 

 

 

(1,077

)

Other, net

 

 

(68

)

 

 

(57

)

 

 

(45

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(9,830

)

 

 

(11,921

)

 

 

(11,778

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

 

25,564

 

 

 

25,817

 

 

 

20,226

 

Payments on debt

 

 

(22,865

)

 

 

(17,934

)

 

 

(16,662

)

Net change in commercial paper

 

 

(410

)

 

 

(704

)

 

 

3,123

 

Net change in financing support provided by affiliates

 

 

(4

)

 

 

2

 

 

 

(26

)

Dividend paid to TFSA

 

 

-

 

 

 

(435

)

 

 

(665

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

2,285

 

 

 

6,746

 

 

 

5,996

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

294

 

 

 

(1,408

)

 

 

(908

)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

 

 

2,407

 

 

 

3,815

 

 

 

4,723

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

 

$

2,701

 

 

$

2,407

 

 

$

3,815

 

Supplemental disclosures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

1,190

 

 

$

1,048

 

 

$

1,102

 

Income taxes (received) paid, net

 

$

(95

)

 

$

143

 

 

$

(30

)

See

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

979

 

 

$

2,535

 

 

$

2,017

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
   activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

5,205

 

 

 

5,963

 

 

 

6,049

 

Recognition of deferred income and fees

 

 

(1,797

)

 

 

(2,396

)

 

 

(2,496

)

Provision for credit losses

 

 

713

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

426

 

Amortization of deferred costs

 

 

1,029

 

 

 

1,019

 

 

 

789

 

Foreign currency and other adjustments to the carrying value of financial instruments, net

 

 

206

 

 

 

(230

)

 

 

1,401

 

Net losses (gains) from investments in marketable securities

 

 

375

 

 

 

181

 

 

 

(149

)

Net change in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative assets

 

 

10

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(3

)

Other assets and accrued interest

 

 

(1,040

)

 

 

(465

)

 

 

142

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

2,173

 

 

 

(1,288

)

 

 

(2,521

)

Derivative liabilities

 

 

(8

)

 

 

24

 

 

 

(44

)

Other liabilities

 

 

(505

)

 

 

652

 

 

 

632

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

7,340

 

 

 

6,224

 

 

 

6,243

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of investments in marketable securities

 

 

(2,467

)

 

 

(2,468

)

 

 

(2,215

)

Proceeds from sales of investments in marketable securities

 

 

1,902

 

 

 

1,769

 

 

 

422

 

Proceeds from maturities of investments in marketable securities

 

 

59

 

 

 

338

 

 

 

932

 

Acquisition of finance receivables

 

 

(40,932

)

 

 

(41,057

)

 

 

(38,702

)

Collection of finance receivables

 

 

34,018

 

 

 

34,335

 

 

 

28,009

 

Net change in wholesale and certain working capital receivables

 

 

(1,812

)

 

 

3,339

 

 

 

4,793

 

Acquisition of investments in operating leases

 

 

(9,617

)

 

 

(15,064

)

 

 

(16,778

)

Disposals of investments in operating leases

 

 

11,001

 

 

 

12,510

 

 

 

11,821

 

Long term loans to affiliates

 

 

(760

)

 

 

(200

)

 

 

(200

)

Payments on long term loans from affiliates

 

 

340

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

506

 

Net change in financing support provided to affiliates

 

 

(36

)

 

 

(26

)

 

 

-

 

Other, net

 

 

(83

)

 

 

(71

)

 

 

(79

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(8,387

)

 

 

(6,295

)

 

 

(11,491

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

 

38,797

 

 

 

37,266

 

 

 

50,281

 

Payments on debt

 

 

(35,374

)

 

 

(38,156

)

 

 

(30,648

)

Net change in commercial paper and other short-term financing

 

 

(1,088

)

 

 

555

 

 

 

(9,049

)

Payment on loan from affiliate

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3,000

)

Net change in financing support provided by affiliates

 

 

-

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(13

)

Dividend paid

 

 

(2,535

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(700

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(200

)

 

 

(346

)

 

 

6,871

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(1,247

)

 

 

(417

)

 

 

1,623

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

 

 

9,735

 

 

 

10,152

 

 

 

8,529

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

 

$

8,488

 

 

$

9,735

 

 

$

10,152

 

Supplemental disclosures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid, net

 

$

2,375

 

 

$

1,649

 

 

$

2,445

 

Income taxes (received) paid, net

 

$

(462

)

 

$

1,797

 

 

$

2,463

 

Refer to the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

7167


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – SummaryBasis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (“TMCC”) is a wholly-owned bysubsidiary of Toyota Financial Services AmericasInternational Corporation (“TFSA”TFSIC”), a California corporation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Toyota Financial Services Corporation (“TFSC”), a Japanese corporation. TFSC, in turn, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Toyota Motor Corporation (“TMC”), a Japanese corporation. TFSC manages TMC’s worldwide financial services operations. References herein to the “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us” denote Toyota Motor Credit CorporationTMCC and its consolidated subsidiaries. TMCC is marketed under the brands of Toyota Financial Services, and Lexus Financial Services, and Mazda Financial Services.

We provide a variety of finance and insurancevoluntary vehicle and payment protection products and services to authorized Toyota (including Scion) and Lexus dealers or dealer groups, private label dealers or dealer groups, and, to a lesser extent, other domestic and import franchise dealers (collectively referred to as “dealers”) and their customers in the United States of America (excluding Hawaii) (the “U.S.”) and Puerto Rico. Our business is substantially dependent upon the sale of Toyota, Lexus, and Scionprivate label vehicles.  TMC has announced that vehicles currently manufactured under the Scion brand will be transitioning to the Toyota brand in August 2016.

Our products and services fall primarily into the following product categories:

·

Finance - We acquire retail installment sales contracts from dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico (“retail contracts”) and leasing contracts accounted for as either operating leases (“lease contracts”) or direct finance leases from dealers in the U.S.  We collectively refer to our retail and lease contracts as the “consumer portfolio”.  We also provide dealer financing, including wholesale financing, working capital loans, revolving lines of credit and real estate financing to dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.  We collectively refer to our dealer financing portfolio as the “dealer portfolio”.

Finance Operations - We acquire retail installment sales contracts from dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico (“retail contracts”) and leasing contracts accounted for as operating leases (“lease contracts”) from dealers in the U.S. We collectively refer to our retail and lease contracts as the “consumer portfolio.” We also provide dealer financing, including wholesale financing, working capital loans, revolving lines of credit and real estate financing to dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. We collectively refer to our dealer financing portfolio as the “dealer portfolio.”

·

Insurance - Through Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, and its insurance company subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “TMIS”), we provide marketing, underwriting, and claims administration for products that cover certain risks of vehicle dealers and their customers.  We also provide coverage and related administrative services to certain of our affiliates in the U.S.

Voluntary Protection Operations - Through Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, and its insurance company subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “TMIS”), we provide marketing, underwriting, and claims administration for voluntary vehicle and payment protection products sold by dealers in the U.S. Our voluntary vehicle and payment protection products include vehicle service, guaranteed auto protection, prepaid maintenance, excess wear and use, tire and wheel protection, key replacement protection, and used vehicle limited warranty contracts (“voluntary protection products”). TMIS also provides coverage and related administrative services to certain of our affiliates in the U.S.

Our primary finance operations are located in the U.S. and Puerto Rico with earning assets principally sourced through Toyota, Lexus, and Lexusprivate label dealers. As of March 31, 2016,2023, approximately 2221 percent of retail and lease contracts were concentrated in California, 1113 percent in Texas, 87 percent in New York, and 5 percent in New Jersey. Our insurancevoluntary protection operations are located in the U.S. As of March 31, 2016,2023, approximately 2625 percent of insurance policies andvoluntary protection contracts were concentrated in California, 76 percent in New York, and 5 percent in New Jersey.Maryland. Any material adverse changes to the economies or applicable laws in these states could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

68


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Other Matters

In fiscal 2021, we announced the restructuring of our customer service operations to better serve our customers by relocating and streamlining the customer service operation and investing in new technology. The restructuring is substantially complete, and our field operations now include three regional Experience Centers located in Chandler, Arizona (serving the West region), Plano, Texas (serving the Central region) and Alpharetta, Georgia (serving the East region).

In fiscal 2022, TMCC announced, in furtherance of its private label financial services initiative for third party automotive and mobility companies, that we entered into a nonbinding letter of intent with Great American Outdoors Group LLC, the parent company of Bass Pro Shops, Cabela’s and the White River Marine Group (“Bass Pro Shops”) to provide private label financial services for Bass Pro Shop’s boats, all-terrain vehicle products, and other mobility products. The Company began to provide inventory financing for Bass Pro Shops, its affiliates, and authorized independent dealers in fiscal 2023, with additional private label services, including consumer financing and voluntary protection products and services, to be added over time. We are leveraging our existing processes and personnel to originate and service the new assets, and we expect to make certain technology investments to support the Bass Pro Shops program. We did not acquire any existing Bass Pro Shops assets or liabilities pursuant to the agreement, and we do not expect launch costs to be significant.

69


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

Our accounting and financial reporting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current yearperiod presentation.

Related party transactions presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements are disclosed in Note 1512 – Related Party Transactions.Transactions.


72


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TMCC, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and all variable interest entities (“VIE”) of which we are the primary beneficiary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Because of inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. The accounting estimates that are most important to our business are the accumulated depreciation related to our investments in operating leases and the allowance for credit losses.

Significant Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are found in the respective Note for which the policy is applicable.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In fiscal 2021, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), along with the subsequently issued guidance amending and clarifying various aspects of ASU 2016-13, using the modified retrospective method as required. In accordance with that method, the comparative period’s information continues to be reported under the relevant accounting guidance in effect for that period. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-13, the incurred loss impairment method was replaced with a new impairment model that reflects lifetime expected losses for our finance receivables. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment to decrease opening retained earnings by approximately $218 million, net of taxes, resulting from a pretax increase to our allowance for credit losses on finance receivables of approximately $292 million. Additionally, we have changed the presentation of accrued interest related to finance receivables in the Consolidated Balance Sheets from Finance receivables, net to Other assets. As of April 1, 2020, we have reclassified accrued interest of $190 million from Finance receivables, net to Other assets. The adoption of this new guidance did not result in a material impact to our available-for-sale debt securities portfolio.

On April 1, 2022, we adopted ASU 2021-05, Lessors-Certain Leases with Variable Lease Payments (Topic 842), which requires a lessor to classify and account for a lease with variable lease payments that do not depend on a reference index or rate as an operating lease if certain criteria are met. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Accounting Guidance Issued But Not Yet Adopted

In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-02, Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures, which eliminates the accounting guidance for Troubled Debt Restructurings by creditors that have adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancing and restructurings made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. Additionally, the ASU adds the requirement to disclose current period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables. This ASU is effective for us on April 1, 2023. The adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

70


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 2 – Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments in Marketable Securities

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents represent highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of acquisition and may include money market instruments, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, U.S. government and agency obligations, or similar instruments.

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

Restricted cash and cash equivalents include customer collections on securitized receivables to be distributed to investors as payments on the related secured notes and loans payable, which are primarily related to securitization trusts. Restricted cash equivalents may also contain proceeds from certain debt issuances for which the use of the cash is restricted.

Investments in marketable securities

Investments in marketable securities consist of debt securities and equity investments.

We classify all of our debt securities as available-for-sale (“AFS”). Except when the fair value option is elected, AFS debt securities are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of applicable taxes. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis and determined using the effective interest method. Realized gains and losses from sales of AFS debt securities are determined using the specific identification method or first in first out method. Dividend income, interest income, and realized gains and losses from the sales of AFS debt securities are included in Investment and other (loss) income, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

We elected the fair value option for certain debt securities held within one of our affiliate investment portfolios for operational ease given the size and composition of this portfolio. All debt securities within this specific portfolio are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value included in Investment and other (loss) income, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income. AFS debt securities for which the fair value option is elected are not subject to credit loss impairment. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, we held AFS debt securities for which the fair value option was elected of $770 million and $674 million, respectively. The difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance of AFS debt securities for which the fair value option was elected was an unrealized loss of $57 million and $41 million as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

All equity investments are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value included in Investment and other (loss) income, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Realized gains and losses from sales of equity investments are determined using the first in first out method and are included in Investment and other (loss) income, net in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

71


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 2 – Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

Investments in marketable securities consisted of the following:

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

cost

 

 

gains

 

 

losses

 

 

value

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

$

796

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

(59

)

 

$

744

 

Foreign government and agency obligations

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

12

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

8

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

8

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

487

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(59

)

 

 

430

 

Mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency

 

 

76

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

73

 

Non-agency residential

 

 

10

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

9

 

Non-agency commercial

 

 

66

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

58

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

127

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

120

 

Total available-for-sale debt securities

 

$

1,584

 

 

$

10

 

 

$

(140

)

 

$

1,454

 

Equity investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,583

 

Total investments in marketable securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

5,037

 

 

 

March 31, 2022

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

cost

 

 

gains

 

 

losses

 

 

value

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

$

538

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

(29

)

 

$

509

 

Foreign government and agency obligations

 

 

26

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

23

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

9

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

598

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

(34

)

 

 

568

 

Mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency

 

 

20

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

20

 

Non-agency residential

 

 

11

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

10

 

Non-agency commercial

 

 

88

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

86

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

82

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

78

 

Total available-for-sale debt securities

 

$

1,372

 

 

$

6

 

 

$

(74

)

 

$

1,304

 

Equity investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,649

 

Total investments in marketable securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,953

 

A portion of our equity investments are investments in funds that are privately placed and managed by an open-end investment management company (the “Trust”). If we elect to redeem shares, the Trust will normally redeem all shares for cash, but may, in unusual circumstances, redeem amounts exceeding the lesser of $250 thousand or 1 percent of the Trust’s asset value by payment in kind of securities held by the respective fund during any 90-day period.

We also invest in actively traded open-end mutual funds. Redemptions are subject to normal terms and conditions as described in each fund’s prospectus.

We had no non-cash investing activities related to in-kind redemption in fiscal 2023. Non-cash investing activities related to in-kind redemptions and subsequent purchases amounted to $1.1 billion in fiscal 2022.

72


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 2 – Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

Unrealized Losses on Securities

The following table presents the aggregate fair value and unrealized losses on AFS debt securities in a continuous unrealized loss position:

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

 

12 months or longer

 

 

Total

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

Fair value

 

 

Unrealized losses

 

 

Fair value

 

 

Unrealized losses

 

 

Fair value

 

 

Unrealized losses

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

$

90

 

 

$

(3

)

 

$

304

 

 

$

(56

)

 

$

394

 

 

$

(59

)

Foreign government and agency obligations

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

11

 

 

 

(2

)

Municipal debt securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

2

 

 

 

(1

)

Corporate debt securities

 

 

46

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

352

 

 

 

(57

)

 

 

398

 

 

 

(59

)

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government agency

 

 

38

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

55

 

 

 

(3

)

Non-agency residential

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

8

 

 

 

(1

)

Non-agency commercial

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

57

 

 

 

(8

)

Asset-backed securities

 

 

47

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

59

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

106

 

 

 

(7

)

Total available-for-sale debt securities

 

$

221

 

 

$

(7

)

 

$

810

 

 

$

(133

)

 

$

1,031

 

 

$

(140

)

The aggregate unrealized losses on AFS debt securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer were not significant as of March 31, 2022.

An allowance for credit losses is established when it is determined that a credit loss has occurred. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, management determined that credit losses did not exist for securities in an unrealized loss position. This analysis considered a variety of factors including, but not limited to, performance indicators of the issuer, default rates, industry analyst reports, credit ratings, and other relevant information, which indicated that contractual cash flows are expected to occur.

Gains and Losses on Securities

The following table represents gains and losses on our investments in marketable securities presented in our Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized losses on securities for which the
   fair value option was elected
1

 

$

(17

)

 

$

(41

)

 

 

 

Realized (losses) gains on sales

 

$

(38

)

 

$

(4

)

 

$

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized (losses) gains

 

$

(297

)

 

$

(158

)

 

$

114

 

Realized (losses) gains on sales

 

$

(23

)

 

$

22

 

 

$

15

 

1.
Starting in fiscal 2022, we elected the fair value option for certain debt securities.

73


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 2 – Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

Contractual Maturities

The amortized cost and fair value by contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities are summarized in the following table. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay certain obligations.

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

 

 

Amortized cost

 

 

Fair value

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due within 1 year

 

$

71

 

 

$

69

 

Due after 1 year through 5 years

 

 

323

 

 

 

305

 

Due after 5 years through 10 years

 

 

495

 

 

 

473

 

Due after 10 years

 

 

416

 

 

 

347

 

Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities 1

 

 

279

 

 

 

260

 

Total

 

$

1,584

 

 

$

1,454

 

1.
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are shown separately from other maturity groupings as these securities have multiple maturity dates.

74


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 3 – Finance Receivables, Net

Finance receivables, net consists of retail loan and dealer products portfolio segments, and includes deferred origination costs, deferred income, and allowance for credit losses. Finance receivables, net also includes securitized retail receivables, which represent retail receivables that have been sold for legal purposes to securitization trusts but continue to be included in our consolidated financial statements, as discussed further in Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities. Cash flows from these securitized retail receivables are available only for the repayment of debt issued by these trusts and other obligations arising from the securitization transactions. They are not available for payment of our other obligations or to satisfy claims of our other creditors.

Finance receivables are classified as held-for-investment if the Company has the intent and ability to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, all finance receivables were classified as held-for-investment.

Revenues associated with retail and dealer financing are recognized to approximate a constant effective yield over the contract term. Incremental direct fees and costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of retail contracts and dealer financing receivables, including incentive and rate participation payments made to dealers, are capitalized and amortized to approximate a constant effective yield over the term of the related contracts. Payments received on subvention and other consumer incentives are deferred and recognized to approximate a constant effective yield over the term of the related contracts.

For both retail loan and dealer products portfolio segments, accrued interest, deferred income, and deferred origination costs, if any, are written off within Provision for credit losses at the earlier of when an account is deemed to be uncollectible or when an account is greater than 120 days past due.

Finance receivables, net consisted of the following:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Retail receivables 1

 

$

79,515

 

 

$

73,152

 

Dealer financing

 

 

12,123

 

 

 

10,298

 

 

 

91,638

 

 

 

83,450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred origination costs

 

 

1,315

 

 

 

1,330

 

Deferred income

 

 

(1,184

)

 

 

(1,102

)

Allowance for credit losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail receivables

 

 

(1,430

)

 

 

(1,195

)

Dealer financing

 

 

(59

)

 

 

(51

)

Total allowance for credit losses

 

 

(1,489

)

 

 

(1,246

)

Finance receivables, net

 

$

90,280

 

 

$

82,432

 

1.
Includes securitized retail receivables of $29.0 billion and $21.2 billion as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Accrued interest related to finance receivables are presented within Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and was $284 million and $214 million at March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

75


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 3 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Credit Quality Indicators

We are exposed to credit risk on our finance receivables. Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the failure of customers or dealers to meet the terms of their contracts with us or otherwise fail to perform as agreed.

Retail Loan Portfolio Segment

The retail loan portfolio segment consists of one class of finance receivables. While we use various credit quality metrics to develop our allowance for credit losses on the retail loan portfolio segment, we primarily utilize the aging of the individual accounts to monitor the credit quality of these finance receivables. Based on our experience, the payment status of borrowers is the strongest indicator of the credit quality of the underlying receivables. Payment status also impacts charge-offs.

Individual borrower accounts within the retail loan portfolio segment are segregated into aging categories based on the number of days past due. The aging of finance receivables is updated monthly.

The following tables present the amortized cost basis of our retail loan portfolio by origination fiscal year by credit quality indicator based on number of days past due:

 

 

Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Fiscal Year at March 31, 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018 and Prior

 

 

Total

 

Aging of finance receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

32,377

 

 

$

22,585

 

 

$

14,278

 

 

$

5,555

 

 

$

2,178

 

 

$

846

 

 

$

77,819

 

30-59 days past due

 

 

306

 

 

 

439

 

 

 

285

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

1,270

 

60-89 days past due

 

 

90

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

378

 

90 days or greater past due

 

 

47

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

179

 

Total

 

$

32,820

 

 

$

23,222

 

 

$

14,678

 

 

$

5,731

 

 

$

2,279

 

 

$

916

 

 

$

79,646

 

 

 

Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Fiscal Year at March 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017 and Prior

 

 

Total

 

Aging of finance receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

32,382

 

 

$

21,917

 

 

$

9,624

 

 

$

4,774

 

 

$

2,674

 

 

$

718

 

 

$

72,089

 

30-59 days past due

 

 

275

 

 

 

304

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

932

 

60-89 days past due

 

 

68

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

242

 

90 days or greater past due

 

 

33

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

117

 

Total

 

$

32,758

 

 

$

22,342

 

 

$

9,834

 

 

$

4,913

 

 

$

2,761

 

 

$

772

 

 

$

73,380

 

The amortized cost of retail loan portfolio excludes accrued interest of $235 million and $192 million at March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The previous tables include contracts greater than 120 days past due, which are recorded at the fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell, and contracts in bankruptcy.

76


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 3 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Dealer Products Portfolio Segment

The dealer products portfolio segment consists of three classes of finance receivables: wholesale, real estate, and working capital (includes both working capital and revolving lines of credit). All loans outstanding for an individual dealer or dealer group, which includes affiliated entities, are aggregated and evaluated collectively by dealer or dealer group. This reflects the interconnected nature of financing provided to our individual dealer and dealer group customers, and their affiliated entities.

When assessing the credit quality of the finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment, we segregate the finance receivables account balances into four categories representing distinct credit quality indicators based on internal risk assessments. The internal risk assessments for all finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment are updated on a monthly basis.

The four credit quality indicators are:

Performing – Account not classified as either Credit Watch, At Risk or Default;
Credit Watch – Account designated for elevated attention;
At Risk – Account where there is an increased likelihood that default may exist based on qualitative and quantitative factors; and
Default – Account is not currently meeting contractual obligations or we have temporarily waived certain contractual requirements

The following tables present the amortized cost basis of our dealer products portfolio by credit quality indicator based on internal risk assessments by origination fiscal year:

 

 

Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Fiscal Year at March 31, 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018 and Prior

 

 

Revolving loans

 

 

Total

 

Wholesale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

3,859

 

 

$

3,859

 

Credit Watch

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

54

 

At Risk

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

51

 

Default

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Wholesale total

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

3,964

 

 

$

3,964

 

Real estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing

 

$

1,378

 

 

$

1,024

 

 

$

1,057

 

 

$

133

 

 

$

300

 

 

$

850

 

 

$

209

 

 

$

4,951

 

Credit Watch

 

 

5

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7

 

At Risk

 

 

8

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

17

 

Default

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Real estate total

 

$

1,391

 

 

$

1,031

 

 

$

1,059

 

 

$

133

 

 

$

300

 

 

$

852

 

 

$

209

 

 

$

4,975

 

Working Capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing

 

$

789

 

 

$

317

 

 

$

182

 

 

$

131

 

 

$

124

 

 

$

88

 

 

$

1,552

 

 

$

3,183

 

Credit Watch

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

At Risk

 

 

-

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1

 

Default

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Working capital total

 

$

789

 

 

$

318

 

 

$

182

 

 

$

131

 

 

$

124

 

 

$

88

 

 

$

1,552

 

 

$

3,184

 

Total

 

$

2,180

 

 

$

1,349

 

 

$

1,241

 

 

$

264

 

 

$

424

 

 

$

940

 

 

$

5,725

 

 

$

12,123

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 3 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

 

 

Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Fiscal Year at March 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017 and Prior

 

 

Revolving loans

 

 

Total

 

Wholesale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

2,927

 

 

$

2,927

 

Credit Watch

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

At Risk

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Default

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Wholesale total

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

2,943

 

 

$

2,943

 

Real estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing

 

$

1,614

 

 

$

1,245

 

 

$

264

 

 

$

384

 

 

$

260

 

 

$

1,245

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

5,012

 

Credit Watch

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7

 

At Risk

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Default

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Real estate total

 

$

1,616

 

 

$

1,245

 

 

$

264

 

 

$

384

 

 

$

260

 

 

$

1,250

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

5,019

 

Working Capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing

 

$

662

 

 

$

321

 

 

$

209

 

 

$

158

 

 

$

37

 

 

$

173

 

 

$

774

 

 

$

2,334

 

Credit Watch

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

At Risk

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Default

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Working capital total

 

$

663

 

 

$

322

 

 

$

209

 

 

$

158

 

 

$

37

 

 

$

173

 

 

$

774

 

 

$

2,336

 

Total

 

$

2,279

 

 

$

1,567

 

 

$

473

 

 

$

542

 

 

$

297

 

 

$

1,423

 

 

$

3,717

 

 

$

10,298

 

The amortized cost of the dealer products portfolio excludes accrued interest of $49 million and $22 million at March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, the amount of line-of-credit arrangements that are converted to term loans in each reporting period was insignificant, respectively.

78


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 3 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Past Due Finance Receivables by Class

Substantially all finance receivables do not involve recourse to the dealer in the event of customer default. Finance receivables include contracts greater than 120 days past due, which are recorded at the fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell, and contracts in bankruptcy. Contracts for which vehicles have been repossessed are excluded. For all finance receivables, we define “past due” as any payment, including principal and interest, that is at least 30 days past the contractual due date. For any customer who is granted a payment extension under an extension program, the aging of the receivable is adjusted for the number of days of the extension granted.

The following tables presents the aging of the amortized cost basis of our finance receivables by class:

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

 

 

30 - 59 Days
past due

 

 

60 - 89 Days
past due

 

 

90 Days or
greater
past due

 

 

Total Past
due

 

 

Current

 

 

Total Finance
receivables

 

 

90 Days or
greater
 
p
ast due and
accruing

 

Retail loan

 

$

1,270

 

 

$

378

 

 

$

179

 

 

$

1,827

 

 

$

77,819

 

 

$

79,646

 

 

$

111

 

Wholesale

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,964

 

 

 

3,964

 

 

 

-

 

Real estate

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,975

 

 

 

4,975

 

 

 

-

 

Working capital

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,184

 

 

 

3,184

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

1,270

 

 

$

378

 

 

$

179

 

 

$

1,827

 

 

$

89,942

 

 

$

91,769

 

 

$

111

 

 

 

March 31, 2022

 

 

 

30 - 59 Days
 past due

 

 

60 - 89 Days
past due

 

 

90 Days or
greater
past due

 

 

Total Past
due

 

 

Current

 

 

Total Finance
receivables

 

 

90 Days or
 greater
 
p
ast due and
 accruing

 

Retail loan

 

$

932

 

 

$

242

 

 

$

117

 

 

$

1,291

 

 

$

72,089

 

 

$

73,380

 

 

$

65

 

Wholesale

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,943

 

 

 

2,943

 

 

 

-

 

Real estate

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,019

 

 

 

5,019

 

 

 

-

 

Working capital

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,336

 

 

 

2,336

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

932

 

 

$

242

 

 

$

117

 

 

$

1,291

 

 

$

82,387

 

 

$

83,678

 

 

$

65

 

79


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 3 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Troubled Debt Restructuring

A troubled debt restructuring occurs when a finance receivable is modified through a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. A finance receivable modified under a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be impaired. In addition, troubled debt restructurings include finance receivables for which the customer has filed for bankruptcy protection. For such finance receivables, we no longer have the ability to modify the terms of the agreement without the approval of the bankruptcy court and the court may impose term modifications that we are obligated to accept.

For accounts not under bankruptcy protection, the amount of finance receivables modified as a troubled debt restructuring during fiscal 2023 and 2022 was not significant for each class of finance receivables. Troubled debt restructurings for accounts not under bankruptcy protection within the retail loan class of finance receivables are comprised exclusively of contract term extensions that reduce the monthly payment due from the customer. For the three classes of finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment, troubled debt restructurings include contract term extensions, interest rate adjustments, waivers of loan covenants, or any combination of the three. Troubled debt restructurings of accounts not under bankruptcy protection did not include forgiveness of principal or interest rate adjustments during fiscal 2023 and 2022.

We consider finance receivables under bankruptcy protection within the retail loan class to be troubled debt restructurings as of the date we receive notice of a customer filing for bankruptcy protection, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the bankruptcy proceedings. The bankruptcy court may impose modifications as part of the proceedings, including interest rate adjustments and forgiveness of principal. For fiscal 2023 and 2022, the financial impact of troubled debt restructurings related to finance receivables under bankruptcy protection was not significant to our Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Balance Sheets.

80


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 4 – Allowance for Credit Losses

Upon adoption of ASU 2016-13 in fiscal 2021, the incurred loss impairment method was replaced with a new impairment model that reflects lifetime expected losses. Management develops and documents the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables based on two portfolio segments. The determination of portfolio segments is based primarily on the qualitative consideration of the nature of our business operations and the characteristics of the underlying finance receivables, as follows:

Retail Loan Portfolio Segment – The retail loan portfolio segment consists of retail contracts acquired from dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. Under a retail contract, we are granted a security interest in the underlying collateral which consists primarily of Toyota, Lexus, and private label vehicles. Based on the common risk characteristics associated with the finance receivables, the retail loan portfolio segment is considered a single class of finance receivable.
Dealer Products Portfolio Segment – The dealer products portfolio segment consists of wholesale financing, real estate loans, working capital loans, and revolving lines of credit to dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. Wholesale financing is primarily collateralized by new or used vehicle inventory with the outstanding balance fluctuating based on the level of inventory. Working capital loans and revolving lines of credit are granted for working capital purposes and are secured by dealership assets. Real estate loans are collateralized by the underlying real estate, are underwritten primarily on a loan-to-value basis and are typically for a fixed term. Based on the risk characteristics associated with the underlying finance receivables, the dealer products portfolio segment consists of three classes of finance receivables: wholesale, working capital (includes both working capital and revolving lines of credit), and real estate.

Management’s estimate of lifetime expected credit losses is based on an evaluation of relevant information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the future collectability of the finance receivables. Management’s evaluation takes into consideration the risks in the retail loan portfolio and dealer products portfolio, past loss experience, delinquency trends, underwriting and collection practices, changes in portfolio composition, economic forecasts and other relevant factors.

Methodology Used to Develop the Allowance for Credit Losses

The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective basis when loans have similar risk characteristics. Loans that do not share similar risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. We generally use a discounted cash flow approach for determining allowance for credit losses for finance receivables modified as a troubled debt restructuring that are granted with interest rate concessions, and a non-discounted cash flow approach for other loans.

We measure expected losses of all components of finance receivables on an amortized cost basis, excluding accrued interest, and including off-balance-sheet lending commitments that are not unconditionally cancellable by TMCC. Estimated expected credit losses for off-balance-sheet lending commitments within our dealer products portfolio are included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have elected to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of expected credit losses as we apply policies and procedures that result in the timely write-offs of accrued interest. Accrued interest is written off within allowance for credit losses at the earlier of when an account is deemed to be uncollectible or when an account is greater than 120 days past due.

Retail Loan Portfolio Segment

The level of credit risk in our retail loan portfolio segment is influenced by various factors such as economic conditions, the used vehicle market, credit quality, contract structure, and collection strategies and practices. The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective basis when loans have similar risk characteristics such as loan-to-value ratio, book payment-to-income ratio, FICO score at origination, collateral type, contract term, and other relevant factors. We use statistical models to estimate lifetime expected credit losses of our retail loan portfolio segment by applying probability of default and loss given default to the exposure at default on a loan level basis.

Probability of default models are developed from internal risk scoring models which consider variables such as delinquency status, historical default frequency, and other credit quality indicators such as loan-to-value ratio, book payment-to-income ratio, FICO score at origination, collateral type (new or used, Lexus, Toyota, or private label), and contract term.

81


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 4 – Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Loss given default models forecast the extent of losses given that a default has occurred and considers variables such as collateral, trends in recoveries, historical loss severity, and other contract structure variables. Exposure at default represents the expected outstanding principal balance, including the effects of expected prepayment when applicable.

The lifetime expected credit losses incorporate the probability-weighted forward-looking macroeconomic forecasts for baseline, favorable, and adverse scenarios. The loan lifetime is regarded by management as the reasonable and supportable period. We use macroeconomic forecasts from a third party and update such forecasts quarterly.

On an ongoing basis, we review our models, including macroeconomic factors, the selection of macroeconomic scenarios and their weighting to ensure they reflect the risk of the portfolio.

If management does not believe the models reflect lifetime expected credit losses, a qualitative adjustment is made to reflect management judgment regarding observable changes in recent or expected economic trends and conditions, portfolio composition, and other relevant factors. While management uses the best information available to make such evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance for credit losses may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations.

Dealer Products Portfolio Segment

The level of credit risk in our dealer products portfolio segment is influenced primarily by the financial strength of dealers within our portfolio, dealer concentration, collateral quality, and other economic factors. The financial strength of dealers within our portfolio is influenced by, among other factors, general economic conditions, the overall demand for new and used vehicles and the financial condition of automotive manufacturers. The allowance for credit losses is established for both outstanding dealer finance receivables and certain unfunded off-balance sheet lending commitments. The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective basis when loans have similar risk characteristics such as dealer group internal risk rating and loan-to-value ratios. We measure lifetime expected credit losses of our dealer products portfolio segment by applying probability of default and loss given default to the exposure at default on a loan level basis. Probability of default is primarily established based on internal risk assessments. The probability of default model also considers qualitative factors related to macroeconomic outlooks. Loss given default is established based on the nature and market value of the collateral, loan-to-value ratios and other credit quality indicators. Exposure at default represents the expected outstanding principal balance. The lifetime of the loan or lending commitment is regarded by management as the reasonable and supportable period. On an ongoing basis, we review our models, including macroeconomic outlooks, to ensure they reflect the risk of the portfolio.

If management does not believe the models reflect lifetime expected credit losses, a qualitative adjustment is made to reflect management judgment regarding observable changes in recent or expected economic trends and conditions, portfolio composition, and other relevant factors. While management uses the best information available to make such evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance for credit losses may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations.

Accounting for the Allowance for Credit Losses

Increases to the allowance for credit losses are accompanied by corresponding charges to the Provision for credit losses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The uncollectible portion of finance receivables is charged to the allowance for credit losses at the earlier of when an account is deemed to be uncollectible or when an account is greater than 120 days past due. In the event we repossess the collateral, the receivable is charged-off and we record the collateral at its estimated fair value less costs to sell and report it in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Recoveries of finance receivables previously charged off as uncollectible are credited to the allowance for credit losses.

82


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 4 – Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

The following tables provide information related to our allowance for credit losses for finance receivables and certain off-balance sheet lending commitments by portfolio segment:

 

 

Year ended March 31, 2023

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

 

Dealer products

 

 

Total

 

Beginning balance, April 1, 2022

 

$

1,195

 

 

$

77

 

 

$

1,272

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(535

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(535

)

Recoveries

 

 

63

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

63

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

707

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

713

 

Ending balance, March 31, 2023 ¹

 

$

1,430

 

 

$

83

 

 

$

1,513

 

1 Ending balance includes $24 million of allowance for credit losses recorded in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet which is related to off-balance sheet commitments in the dealer products portfolio.

 

 

Year ended March 31, 2022

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

 

Dealer products

 

 

Total

 

Beginning balance, April 1, 2021

 

$

1,075

 

 

$

140

 

 

$

1,215

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(237

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(237

)

Recoveries

 

 

58

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

58

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

299

 

 

 

(63

)

 

 

236

 

Ending balance, March 31, 2022 ¹

 

$

1,195

 

 

$

77

 

 

$

1,272

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Ending balance includes $26 million of allowance for credit losses recorded in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet which is related to off-balance sheet commitments in the dealer products portfolio.

Finance receivables for the dealer products portfolio segment as of March 31, 2023 includes $1.0 billion in finance receivables that are guaranteed by Toyota Motor North America, Inc. (“TMNA”), and $199 million in finance receivables that are guaranteed by third-party private Toyota distributors. Finance receivables for the dealer products portfolio segment as of March 31, 2022 includes $929 million in finance receivables that are guaranteed by TMNA, and $187 million in finance receivables that are guaranteed by third-party private Toyota distributors. These finance receivables are related to certain Toyota and Lexus dealers and other third parties to whom we provided financing at the request of TMNA and third-party private Toyota distributors.

83


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 5 – Investments in Operating Leases, Net

Investments in operating leases, net consists of vehicle lease contracts acquired from dealers, and includes deferred origination fees and costs, deferred income, and accumulated depreciation. Generally, lessees have the ability to extend their lease term in six month increments up to a total of 12 months from the original lease maturity date. A lease can be terminated at any time by satisfying the obligations under the lease contract. Early termination programs may be occasionally offered to eligible lessees. At the end of the lease, the customer has the option to buy the leased vehicle or return the vehicle to the dealer.

Securitized investments in operating leases represent beneficial interests in a pool of certain vehicle leases that have been sold for legal purposes to securitization trusts but continue to be included in our consolidated financial statements as discussed further in Note 8 - Variable Interest Entities. Cash flows from these securitized investments in operating leases are available only for the repayment of debt issued by these trusts and other obligations arising from the securitization transactions. They are not available for payment of our other obligations or to satisfy claims of our other creditors.

Operating lease revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. We have made an accounting policy election to exclude from the consideration in the contract, and from variable payments not included in the consideration in the contract, sales and other taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific lease revenue-producing transaction and collected from customers. Deferred fees and costs include incentive payments made to dealers and acquisition fees collected from customers. Deferred income includes payments received on affiliate sponsored subvention and other incentive programs. Both deferred fees and costs and deferred income are capitalized or deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the contract term. The accrual of revenue on investments in operating leases is discontinued at the time an account is determined to be uncollectible and subsequent revenue is recognized only to the extent a payment is received. Operating leases may be restored to accrual status when future payments are reasonably assured.

Vehicle Lease Residual Values

Contractual residual values of vehicle lease contracts are estimated at lease inception by examining external industry data, the anticipated Toyota, Lexus, and private label product pipeline and our own experience. Factors considered in this evaluation include macroeconomic forecasts, new vehicle pricing, new vehicle incentive programs, new vehicle sales, vehicle features and specifications, the mix and level of used vehicle supply, the level of current used vehicle values, and fuel prices. We are exposed to a risk of loss to the extent the customer returns the vehicle and the value of the vehicle is lower than the residual value estimated at inception of the lease or if the number of returned vehicles is higher than anticipated.

Depreciation on operating leases is recognized using the straight-line method over the lease term. The depreciable basis is the original acquisition cost of the vehicle less the estimated residual value of the vehicle at the end of the lease term. On a quarterly basis, we review the estimated end-of-term market values and return rates of leased vehicles to assess the appropriateness of the carrying values at lease-end. Factors affecting the estimated end-of-term market value are similar to those considered in the evaluation of residual values at lease inception discussed above. Adjustments to depreciation expense to reflect revised estimates of expected market values at lease termination and revised return rates are recorded prospectively on a straight-line basis over the remaining lease term.

We use various channels to sell vehicles returned at lease-end. Upon disposition, the difference between the net book value of the lease and the proceeds received from the disposition of the asset, including any insurance proceeds is recorded as an adjustment to depreciation on operating leases.

We evaluate our investment in operating leases portfolio for potential impairment when we determine a triggering event has occurred. When a triggering event has occurred, we perform a test of recoverability by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows (including expected residual values) over the remaining lease terms to the carrying value of the asset group. If the test of recoverability identifies a possible impairment, the asset group’s fair value is measured in accordance with the fair value measurement framework. An impairment charge would be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset group exceeds its estimated fair value and would be recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Income. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, there was no impairment in our investment in operating leases portfolio.

84


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 5 – Investments in Operating Leases, Net (Continued)

Our depreciation policy for operating leases incorporates our historical experience on early terminations due to customer defaults into the useful live of the vehicles. We consider the effects of operating lease early terminations when determining depreciation estimates, which are included as part of accumulated depreciation within Investments in operating leases, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Depreciation on operating leases in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Investments in operating leases, net consisted of the following:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Investments in operating leases 1

 

$

38,811

 

 

$

45,682

 

Deferred income

 

 

(694

)

 

 

(1,272

)

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(8,248

)

 

 

(8,955

)

Investments in operating leases, net

 

$

29,869

 

 

$

35,455

 

1.
Includes securitized investments in operating leases of $15.3 billion and $16.2 billion as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

The following table presents future minimum lease payments due to us as lessor under investments in operating leases after March 31, 2023:

Years ending March 31,

 

Future minimum lease payments on operating leases

 

2024

 

$

4,755

 

2025

 

 

2,439

 

2026

 

 

821

 

2027

 

 

57

 

2028

 

 

5

 

Thereafter

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

8,077

 

A portion of our operating lease contracts has historically terminated prior to maturity. Future minimum lease payments shown above should not be considered indicative of future cash collections.

85


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 6 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense

Derivative Instruments

Our liabilities consist mainly of fixed and variable rate debt, denominated in U.S. dollars and various other currencies, which we issue in the global capital markets, while our assets consist primarily of U.S. dollar denominated, fixed rate receivables. We enter into interest rate swaps and foreign currency swaps to economically hedge the interest rate and foreign currency risks that result from the different characteristics of our assets and liabilities. Our use of derivative transactions is intended to reduce long-term fluctuations in the fair value of assets and liabilities caused by market movements. All of our derivatives are categorized as not designated for hedge accounting, and all of our derivative activities are authorized and monitored by our management and our Asset-Liability Committee which provides a framework for financial controls and governance to manage market risk.

All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow us to net settle asset and liability positions and offset cash collateral with the same counterparty on a net basis. Changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments are recorded in Interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. The derivative instruments are included as a component of Other assets or Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Offsetting of Derivatives

Accounting guidance permits the net presentation on our Consolidated Balance Sheets of derivative receivables and derivative payables with the same counterparty and the related cash collateral when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists, or when the derivative receivables and derivative payables meet all the conditions for the right of setoff to exist. When we meet this condition, we elect to present such balances on a net basis.

Over-the-Counter (“OTC”) Derivatives

Our International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements are our master netting agreements which permit multiple transactions to be cancelled and settled with a single net balance paid to either party for our OTC derivatives. The master netting agreements also contain reciprocal collateral agreements which require the transfer of cash collateral to the party in a net asset position across all transactions. Our collateral agreements with substantially all our counterparties include a zero threshold, full collateralization arrangement. Although we have daily valuation and collateral exchange arrangements with all of our counterparties, due to the time required to move collateral, there may be a delay of up to one day between the exchange of collateral and the valuation of our derivatives. We would not be required to post additional collateral to the counterparties with whom we were in a net liability position at March 31, 2023, if our credit ratings were to decline, since we fully collateralize without regard to credit ratings with these counterparties. In addition, as our collateral agreements include legal right of offset provisions, collateral amounts are netted against derivative assets or derivative liabilities, and the net amount is included in Other assets or Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Centrally Cleared Derivatives

For our centrally cleared derivatives, variation margin payments are legally characterized as settlement payments and accounted for with corresponding derivative positions as one unit of account as opposed to collateral. Initial margin payments are separately recorded in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We perform valuation and margin exchange on a daily basis. Similar to the OTC swaps, there may be a delay of up to one day between the exchange of margin payments and the valuation of our derivatives.

86


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 6 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)

Derivative Activity Impact on Consolidated Financial Statements

The following tables show the financial statement line item and amount of our derivative assets and liabilities that are reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

 

March 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

value

 

 

Notional

 

 

value

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

56,799

 

 

$

1,888

 

 

$

64,327

 

 

$

1,425

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

1,237

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

1,594

 

 

 

55

 

Total

 

$

58,036

 

 

$

1,937

 

 

$

65,921

 

 

$

1,480

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty netting

 

 

 

 

 

(659

)

 

 

 

 

 

(761

)

Collateral held

 

 

 

 

 

(1,227

)

 

 

 

 

 

(658

)

Carrying value of derivative contracts – Other assets

 

 

 

 

$

51

 

 

 

 

 

$

61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

46,082

 

 

$

468

 

 

$

19,903

 

 

$

822

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

6,447

 

 

 

1,002

 

 

 

8,102

 

 

 

717

 

Total

 

$

52,529

 

 

$

1,470

 

 

$

28,005

 

 

$

1,539

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty netting

 

 

 

 

 

(659

)

 

 

 

 

 

(761

)

Collateral posted

 

 

 

 

 

(794

)

 

 

 

 

 

(753

)

Carrying value of derivative contracts – Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

$

17

 

 

 

 

 

$

25

 

As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, we held excess collateral and variation margin of $23 million and $2 million, respectively, which we did not use to offset derivative assets and was recorded in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, we posted initial margin, excess collateral, and variation margin of $265 million and $132 million, respectively, which we did not use to offset derivative liabilities and was recorded in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table summarizes the components of interest expense, including the location and amount of gains and losses on derivative instruments and related hedged items, as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Interest expense on debt

 

$

2,919

 

 

$

1,498

 

 

$

1,954

 

Interest (income) expense on derivatives

 

 

(569

)

 

 

107

 

 

 

420

 

Interest expense on debt and derivatives

 

 

2,350

 

 

 

1,605

 

 

 

2,374

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Gains) losses on debt denominated in
 foreign currencies

 

 

(614

)

 

 

(438

)

 

 

1,402

 

Losses (gains) on foreign currency swaps

 

 

805

 

 

 

818

 

 

 

(1,351

)

Losses (gains) on U.S. dollar interest rate swaps

 

 

513

 

 

 

(584

)

 

 

(123

)

Total interest expense

 

$

3,054

 

 

$

1,401

 

 

$

2,302

 

Interest expense on debt and derivatives represents net interest settlements and changes in accruals. Gains and losses on derivatives and debt denominated in foreign currencies exclude net interest settlements and changes in accruals. Cash flows associated with derivatives are reported in Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

87


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 7 – Debt and Credit Facilities

Debt and the related weighted average contractual interest rates are summarized as follows:

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

March 31, 2022

 

 

Face value

 

 

Carrying value

 

 

Weighted average
contractual interest rates

 

Face value

 

 

Carrying value

 

 

Weighted average
contractual interest rates

Unsecured notes and loans payable

 

$

79,393

 

 

$

78,949

 

 

3.48%

 

$

82,542

 

 

$

82,288

 

 

1.30%

Secured notes and loans payable

 

 

32,777

 

 

 

32,736

 

 

3.76%

 

 

26,907

 

 

 

26,864

 

 

1.01%

Total debt

 

$

112,170

 

 

$

111,685

 

 

3.56%

 

$

109,449

 

 

$

109,152

 

 

1.23%

The carrying value of our debt includes unamortized premiums, discounts, debt issuance costs and the effects of foreign currency translation adjustments. Debt issuance costs are deferred and amortized to interest expense on an effective yield basis over the contractual term of the debt.

Weighted average contractual interest rates are calculated based on original notional or par value before consideration of premium or discount and approximate the effective interest rates.

Debt is callable at par value. Scheduled maturities of our debt portfolio are summarized below. Actual repayment of secured debt will vary based on the repayment activity on the related pledged assets.

 

 

Future

 

Years ending March 31,

 

debt maturities

 

2024

 

$

49,501

 

2025

 

 

22,224

 

2026

 

 

16,694

 

2027

 

 

8,293

 

2028

 

 

8,307

 

Thereafter 1

 

 

7,151

 

Unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs

 

 

(485

)

Total debt

 

$

111,685

 

1.
Unsecured and secured notes and loans payable mature on various dates through fiscal 2049.

Unsecured Notes and Loans Payable

Our unsecured notes and loans payable consist of commercial paper and fixed and variable rate debt. Short-term funding needs are met through the issuance of commercial paper in the U.S. Amounts outstanding under our commercial paper programs were $16.7 billion and $16.9 billion as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Upon issuance of fixed rate debt, we generally elect to enter into pay-float swaps to convert fixed rate payments on debt to floating rate payments. Certain unsecured notes and loans payable are denominated in various foreign currencies. The debt is translated into U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate at the transaction date and retranslated at each balance sheet date using the exchange rate in effect at that date. The resulting transaction gains and losses are included in Interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Concurrent with the issuance of these foreign currency unsecured notes and loans payable, we enter into currency swaps in the same notional amount to convert non-U.S. currency payments to U.S. dollar denominated payments. Gains and losses related to foreign currency transactions are included in Interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income.

Certain of our unsecured notes and loans payable contain covenants and conditions customary in transactions of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions and limitations on certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. We are currently in compliance with these covenants and conditions.

88


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 7 – Debt and Credit Facilities (Continued)

Secured Notes and Loans Payable

Our secured notes and loans payable are denominated in U.S. dollars and consist of both fixed and variable rate debt. Secured notes and loans payable are issued using on-balance sheet securitization trusts, as further discussed in Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities. These notes are repayable only from collections on the underlying securitized retail finance receivables and the beneficial interests in investments in operating leases and from related credit enhancements. Some of our secured notes are backed by a revolving pool of finance receivables and cash collateral, with the ability to repay the notes in full after the revolving period ends, after which an amortization period begins.

Credit Facilities and Letters of Credit

For additional liquidity purposes, we maintain credit facilities, which may be used for general corporate purposes, as described below:

364-Day Credit Agreement, Three-Year Credit Agreement and Five-Year Credit Agreement

TMCC, Toyota Credit de Puerto Rico Corp. (“TCPR”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, and other Toyota affiliates are party to a $5.0 billion 364-day syndicated bank credit facility, a $5.0 billion three-year syndicated bank credit facility, and a $5.0 billion five-year syndicated bank credit facility, expiring in fiscal 2024, 2026, and 2028, respectively.

The ability to make draws is subject to covenants and conditions customary in transactions of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions and limitations on certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. These agreements were not drawn upon and had no outstanding balances as of March 31, 2023 and 2022. We are currently in compliance with the covenants and conditions of the credit agreements described above.

Committed Revolving Asset-backed Facility

We are party to a 364-day revolving securitization facility with certain bank-sponsored asset-backed conduits and other financial institutions expiring in fiscal 2024. Under the terms and subject to the conditions of this facility, the committed lenders under the facility have committed to make advances up to a facility limit of $8.0 billion backed by eligible retail finance receivables transferred by us to a special-purpose entity acting as borrower. We utilized $5.5 billion and $3.2 billion of this facility as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Other Unsecured Credit Agreements

TMCC is party to additional unsecured credit facilities with various banks. As of March 31, 2023, TMCC had committed bank credit facilities totaling $4.6 billion, of which $2.3 billion, $180 million, and $2.1 billion mature in fiscal 2024, 2025, and 2026, respectively.

These credit agreements contain covenants and conditions customary in transactions of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions and limitations on certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. These credit facilities were not drawn upon and had no outstanding balances as of March 31, 2023 and 2022. We are currently in compliance with the covenants and conditions of the credit agreements described above.

TMCC is party to a $5.0 billion three-year revolving credit facility with Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“TMS”), expiring in fiscal 2026. This credit facility was not drawn upon and had no outstanding balance as of March 31, 2023 and 2022.

From time to time, we may borrow from affiliates based upon a number of business factors such as funds availability, cash flow timing, relative cost of funds, and market access capabilities. Amounts borrowed from affiliates are recorded in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

89


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities

A VIE is an entity that either (i) has insufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) has equity investors who lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the party with both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb the losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

To assess whether we have the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance, we consider all the facts and circumstances including our role in establishing the VIE and our ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the party that makes the most significant decisions affecting the VIE is determined to have the power to direct the activities of athe VIE. To assess whether we have the obligation to absorb the losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE, we consider all of our economic interests, including debt and equity interests, servicing rights and fee arrangements, and any other variable interests in the VIE. If we determine that we are the party with the power to make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE, and we have an obligation to absorb the losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE, then we consolidate the VIE.

We perform ongoing reassessments, usually quarterly, of whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The reassessment process considers whether we have acquired or divested the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE through changes in governing documents or other circumstances. We also reconsider whether entities previously determined not to be VIEs have become VIEs, based on new events, and therefore could be subject to the VIE consolidation framework.

See Note 10 – Variable Interest Entities for additional discussion and disclosure.


73


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Because of inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.  The accounting estimates that are most important to our business are the determination of residual value relating to our investments in operating leases and the allowance for credit losses as well as estimates related to the fair value of our derivative instruments and marketable securities.

Sale of Commercial Finance Business

In December 2014, we entered into an agreement for the sale of certain assets and liabilities relating to our industrial equipment retail, lease and dealer portfolios (hereinafter the “commercial finance business” or “disposal group”) to Toyota Industries Commercial Finance, Inc. (“TICF”), a newly-formed subsidiary of Toyota Industries Corporation, which forms part of the group of companies known as the Toyota Group and is a related party to TMCC.

As of August 31, 2015, we reclassified our commercial finance business to held-for-sale under Accounting Standard Codification 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, as all of the following criteria were met: management, having the authority to approve the action, committed to a plan to sell the disposal group; the disposal group was available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary; a buyer was located; the sale of the disposal group was determined to be probable, and transfer of the disposal group was expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year; the disposal group was actively marketed for sale at a price that was reasonable in relation to its then current fair value; and actions required to complete the plan indicated that it was unlikely significant changes to the plan would be made or that the plan would be withdrawn.

We initially measure a long-lived asset or disposal group that is classified as held-for-sale at the lower of its carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell.  Any loss resulting from this measurement is recognized in the period in which the held-for-sale criteria are met.  Conversely, gains are not recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset or disposal group until the date of sale.  We assess the fair value of a long-lived asset or disposal group, less any costs to sell, each reporting period it remains classified as held-for-sale.  We report any subsequent changes as an adjustment to the carrying value of the asset or disposal group, as long as the new carrying value does not exceed the carrying value of the asset at the time it was initially classified as held-for-sale.

On October 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our commercial finance business to TICF.  The sale resulted in cash proceeds of $2.3 billion, which are expected to be utilized for general corporate purposes, including the purchase of retail and lease contracts and the payment of debt.  The transaction resulted in a gain of $197 million that is reflected in our results of operations for fiscal 2016.  As the sale of our commercial finance business did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on our operations and financial results, it did not meet the criteria to be presented as a discontinued operation.

Revenue Recognition

Retail and Dealer Financing Revenues

Revenues associated with retail and dealer financing are recognized so as to approximate a constant effective yield over the contract term.  Incremental direct fees and costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of retail contracts and dealer financing receivables, including incentive and rate participation payments made to vehicle dealers, are capitalized and amortized so as to approximate a constant effective yield over the term of the related contracts.  Payments received on affiliate sponsored special rate programs (“subvention”) are deferred and recognized to approximate a constant effective yield over the term of the related contracts.  Included in financing revenues are other fees, including late fees and other service charges, the amounts of which are not significant to total financing revenues.


74


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Operating Lease Revenues

Operating lease revenues are recorded to income on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  Incremental direct fees and costs received or paid in connection with the acquisition of operating leases, including incentive and rate participation payments made to dealers and acquisition fees collected from customers, are capitalized or deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related contracts.  Payments received on subvention programs are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related contracts.  Operating lease revenue is recorded net of sales taxes collected from customers.  Included in operating lease revenues are other fees, including late fees and other service charges, the amounts of which are not significant to total operating lease revenue.

Direct Finance Lease Revenues

Direct finance lease revenues are recognized over the lease term so as to approximate a constant effective yield on the outstanding net investment.  Incremental direct costs and fees paid or received in connection with the acquisition of direct finance leases, including incentive and rate participation payments made to dealers and acquisition fees collected from customers, are capitalized or deferred and amortized to approximate a constant effective yield over the term of the related contracts.  Payments received on subvention programs are deferred and recognized to approximate a constant effective yield over the term of the related contracts.  Included in direct finance lease revenues are other fees, including late fees and other service charges, the amounts of which are not significant to total direct finance lease revenue.  Direct finance lease revenues are reported in Retail revenues in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Insurance Earned Premiums and Contract Revenues

Revenues from providing coverage under various contractual agreements are recognized over the term of the coverage in relation to the timing and level of anticipated claims and administrative expenses.  Revenues from insurance policies, net of premiums ceded to reinsurers, are earned over the terms of the respective policies in proportion to the estimated loss development.  Management relies on historical loss experience as a basis for establishing earnings factors used to recognize revenue over the term of the contract or policy.

The portion of premiums and contract revenues applicable to the unexpired terms of the agreements is recorded as unearned insurance premiums and contract revenues.  Agreements sold range in term from 3 to 120 months.  Certain costs of acquiring new agreements, consisting primarily of dealer commissions and premium taxes, are deferred and amortized over the term of the related policies on the same basis as revenues are earned.  The effect of subsequent cancellations is recorded as an offset to unearned insurance premiums and contract revenues.

Service commissions and fees are recognized over the term of the coverage in relation to the timing of services performed.  

Depreciation on Operating Leases

Depreciation on operating leases is recognized using the straight-line method over the lease term, typically two to five years.  The depreciable basis is the original cost of the vehicle less the estimated residual value of the vehicle at the end of the lease term.  During the lease term, adjustments to depreciation expense reflecting revised estimates of expected residual values at the end of the lease terms are recorded prospectively on a straight-line basis.


75


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Allowance for Credit Losses

We maintain an allowance for credit losses to cover probable and estimable losses on our finance receivables and investments in operating leases resulting from the failure of customers or dealers to make contractual payments.  Management evaluates the allowance at least quarterly, considering a variety of factors and assumptions to determine whether the allowance is considered adequate to cover probable and estimable losses incurred as of the balance sheet date.  The allowance for credit losses is management’s estimate of the amount of probable incurred credit losses in our existing finance receivables and investment in operating leases portfolios.

Management develops and documents the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables based on three portfolio segments.  We also separately develop and document the allowance for credit losses for investments in operating leases.  Investments in operating leases are not within the scope of accounting guidance governing the disclosure of portfolio segments.  The determination of portfolio segments is based primarily on the qualitative consideration of the nature of our business operations and the characteristics of the underlying finance receivables.  Until October 1, 2015, the three portfolio segments within finance receivables, net were:

·

Retail Loan Portfolio Segment – The retail loan portfolio segment consists of retail contracts acquired from dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico (“retail contracts”).  Under a retail contract, we are granted a security interest in the underlying collateral which consists primarily of Toyota, Scion or Lexus vehicles.  Based on the common risk characteristics associated with the finance receivables, the retail loan portfolio segment is considered a single class of finance receivable.

·

Commercial Portfolio Segment – The commercial portfolio segment consists of commercial contracts (“commercial loan contracts”) and leasing contracts accounted for as direct finance leases acquired from commercial truck and industrial equipment dealers in the U.S.  Under commercial loan and direct finance leases, we are granted a security interest in the underlying collateral which consists of various types of commercial trucks and industrial equipment.  Based on the common risk characteristics associated with the finance receivables and the similarity of the credit risk with respect to the two types of contracts, the commercial portfolio segment is considered a single class of finance receivable.

·

Dealer Products Portfolio Segment – The dealer products portfolio segment consists of wholesale financing, working capital loans, revolving lines of credit and real estate loans to dealers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.  Wholesale financing is primarily collateralized by new or used vehicle inventory with the outstanding balance fluctuating based on the level of inventory.  Real estate loans are collateralized by the underlying real estate, are underwritten primarily on a loan-to-value basis and are typically for a fixed term.  Working capital loans and revolving lines of credit are granted for working capital purposes and are secured by dealership assets.  Based on the risk characteristics associated with the underlying finance receivables, the dealer products portfolio segment consists of three classes of finance receivables: wholesale, real estate, and working capital.

On October 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our commercial finance business to TICF. As a result of this sale, subsequent to October 1, 2015, we no longer have the commercial portfolio segment and a portion of the dealer products portfolio segment related to the commercial finance business.

76


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Methodology Used to Develop the Allowance for Credit Losses

Retail Loan Portfolio Segment and Investments in Operating Leases

The level of credit risk in our retail loan portfolio segment and our investments in operating leases is influenced primarily by two factors: default frequency and loss severity, which in turn are influenced by various factors such as economic conditions, the used vehicle market, purchase quality mix, contract term length, and operational changes.

We evaluate the retail loan portfolio segment and investments in operating leases using methodologies that include roll rate, credit risk grade/tier, and vintage analysis.  We review and analyze external factors, including changes in economic conditions, actual or perceived quality, safety and reliability of Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles, unemployment levels, the used vehicle market, and consumer behavior.  In addition, internal factors, such as purchase quality mix and operational changes are also considered in the analyses.  

We utilize a loss emergence period assumption in developing our allowance for credit losses.  This assumption represents the average length of time between when a loss event first occurs and when the account is charged off.  This time period starts when the consumer begins to experience financial difficulty.  

Commercial Portfolio Segment

The level of credit risk in our commercial portfolio segment is influenced primarily by two factors: default frequency and loss severity, which in turn are influenced by various economic factors, the used equipment and truck markets, purchase quality mix, contract term length, and operational changes.

We evaluate the commercial portfolio segment using methodologies that include product grouping analysis, historical loss and loss frequency by product.  We review and analyze external factors, including changes in economic conditions, unemployment level, and the used equipment and truck markets.  In addition, internal factors, such as purchase quality mix and operational changes are also considered in the analyses.

Dealer Products Portfolio Segment

The level of credit risk in our dealer products portfolio segment is influenced primarily by the financial strength of dealers within our portfolio, dealer concentration, collateral quality, and other economic factors.  The financial strength of dealers within our portfolio is influenced by, among other factors, general economic conditions, the overall demand for new and used vehicles and the financial condition of automotive manufacturers in general.

We evaluate the dealer portfolio by aggregating dealer financing receivables into loan-risk pools, which are determined based on the risk characteristics of the loan (e.g. secured by vehicles, real estate or dealership assets).  We analyze the loan-risk pools using internally developed risk ratings for each dealer.  We also utilize a loss emergence period assumption in developing our allowance for credit losses.  The loss emergence period represents the time period between the date at which the default is estimated to have occurred and the ultimate confirmation of that default through charge-off.  In addition, field operations management and our special assets group are consulted each quarter to determine if any specific dealer loan is considered impaired.  If impaired loans are identified, specific reserves are established, as appropriate, and the loan is removed from the loan-risk pool for separate monitoring.  

77


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Accounting for the Allowance for Credit Losses and Impaired Receivables

The majority of the allowance for credit losses covers estimated losses on the retail loan portfolio segment which is collectively evaluated for impairment.  The remainder of the allowance for credit losses covers the estimated losses on investments in operating leases, the dealer products portfolio segment, and the commercial portfolio segment.  Within the dealer products portfolio segment, we establish specific reserves to cover the estimated losses on individual impaired loans (including loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring).  The specific reserves are assessed based on discounted cash flows, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the underlying collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Troubled debt restructurings in the retail loan and commercial portfolio segments are aggregated with their respective portfolio segments when determining the allowance for credit losses.  These loans are homogenous in nature and insignificant for individual evaluation and we have determined that the allowance for credit losses for each of the retail loan and commercial portfolio segments would not be materially different if they had been individually evaluated for impairment.

Increases to the allowance for credit losses are accompanied by corresponding charges to the Provision for credit losses on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The uncollectible portion of finance receivables and investments in operating leases is charged to the allowance for credit losses at the earlier of when an account is deemed to be uncollectible or when an account is greater than 120 days past due.  In the event we repossess the collateral, the receivable is charged-off and we record the collateral at its estimated fair value less costs to sell and report it in Other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  Recoveries of finance receivables and investments in operating leases previously charged off as uncollectible are credited to the allowance for credit losses.

See Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses for additional discussion and disclosure.

Insurance Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses include amounts paid and accrued for loss events that are known and have been recorded as claims, estimates of losses incurred but not reported that are based on actuarial estimates and historical loss development patterns, and loss adjustment expenses that are expected to be incurred in connection with settling and paying these claims.

Accruals for unpaid losses, losses incurred but not reported, and loss adjustment expenses are included in Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These accruals arising from contractual agreements entered into by TMIS are not significant as of March 31, 2016 and 2015.  Estimated liabilities are reviewed regularly, and we recognize any adjustments in the periods in which they are determined.  If anticipated losses, loss adjustment expenses, and unamortized acquisition and maintenance costs exceed the recorded unearned premium, a premium deficiency is recognized by first charging any unamortized acquisition costs to expense and then by recording a liability for any excess deficiency.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents represent highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at purchase and may include money market instruments, commercial paper, certificates of deposit or similar instruments.

Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Restricted cash and cash equivalents primarily represent proceeds from certain debt issuances for which the use of the cash is restricted, as well as customer collections on securitized receivables to be distributed to investors as payments on the related secured debt, which are primarily related to securitization trusts.  Restricted cash may also contain amounts unrelated to financing activities which are restricted as to use.  There were no restricted cash equivalents as of March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

78


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Investments in Marketable Securities

Investments in marketable securities consist of debt and equity securities.  Debt and equity securities designated as available-for-sale (“AFS”) are recorded at fair value using quoted market prices where available with unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of applicable taxes.  Realized gains and losses are determined using either the specific identification method or first in first out method, depending on the type of investment in our portfolio.  Realized investment gains and losses are reflected in Investment and other income, net in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Other-than-Temporary Impairment

An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis.  Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI.  We conduct periodic reviews of securities in unrealized loss positions for the purpose of evaluating whether the impairment is other-than-temporary.

As part of our ongoing assessment of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”), we consider a variety of factors.  Such factors include the length of time and extent to which the market value of a security has been less than amortized cost, adverse conditions specifically related to the industry, geographic area or financial condition of the issuer or underlying collateral of the security and the volatility of the fair value changes.

An OTTI loss with respect to debt securities must be recognized in earnings if we have the intent to sell the debt security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.  If we have the intent to sell, the cost basis of the security is written down to fair value and the write down is reflected in Investment and other income, net in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  If we have no intent to sell and we believe that it is more likely than not we will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery, the credit loss component of the unrealized losses is recognized in Investment and other income, net in the Consolidated Statement of Income, while the remainder of the loss is recognized in AOCI.  The credit loss component recognized in Investment and other income, net in the Consolidated Statement of Income is identified as the portion of the amortized cost of the security not expected to be collected over the remaining term as projected using a cash flow analysis for debt securities.

We perform periodic reviews of our AFS equity securities to determine whether unrealized losses are temporary in nature.  We consider our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient for recovery of fair value.  Where we lack that intent or ability, the equity security’s decline in fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary.  If losses are considered to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to fair value and the write down is reflected in Investment and other income, net in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

See Note 3 – Investments in Marketable Securities for additional discussion and disclosure.

79


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Finance Receivables

Our finance receivables consist of the retail loan, the commercial and the dealer products portfolio segments.  Finance receivables recorded on our balance sheet include accrued interest and deferred fees and costs, net of the allowance for credit losses, certain other dealer funds and deferred income.  Direct finance leases are recorded on our balance sheet as the aggregate future minimum lease payments, contractual residual value of the leased vehicle, and deferred income.

Finance receivables are classified as held-for-investment if the Company has the intent and ability to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff.  As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, all finance receivables were classified as held-for-investment.

Impaired Finance Receivables

A finance receivable is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the terms of the contract.  Factors such as payment history, compliance with terms and conditions of the underlying loan agreement and other subjective factors related to the financial stability of the borrower are considered when determining whether a finance receivable is impaired.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

A troubled debt restructuring occurs when a finance receivable is modified through a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty.  A finance receivable modified under a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be impaired.  In addition, troubled debt restructurings include finance receivables for which the customer has filed for bankruptcy protection.  For such finance receivables, we no longer have the ability to modify the terms of the agreement without the approval of the bankruptcy court and the court may impose term modifications that we are obligated to accept.

Nonaccrual Policy

Retail Loan and Commercial Portfolio Segments

The accrual of revenue is discontinued at the time a retail loan or commercial portfolio segment finance receivable is determined to be uncollectible.  These finance receivables may be restored to accrual status only when a customer settles all past due deficiency balances and future payments are reasonably assured.  For these finance receivables in non-accrual status, subsequent financing revenue is recognized only to the extent a payment is received.  Payments are generally applied first to outstanding interest and then to the unpaid principal balance.

Dealer Products Portfolio Segment

Impaired receivables in the dealer product portfolio segment are placed on nonaccrual status if full payment of principal or interest is in doubt, or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due.  Interest accrued, but not collected at the date a receivable is placed on nonaccrual status, is reversed against interest income.  In addition, the amortization of net deferred fees is suspended.  Interest income on nonaccrual receivables is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash.  Finance receivables are restored to accrual status only when interest and principal payments are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.  Finance receivables are charged off against the allowance for credit losses when the loss has been realized.

See Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net for additional discussion and disclosure.

80


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Investments in Operating Leases

We record our investments in operating leases at acquisition cost, net of deferred fees and costs, deferred income, accumulated depreciation and the allowance for credit losses.

Nonaccrual Policy

The accrual of revenue on investments in operating leases is discontinued at the time an account is determined to be uncollectible.  Operating leases may be restored to accrual status only when a customer settles all past due deficiency balances and future payments are reasonably assured.  For investments in operating leases in non-accrual status, subsequent operating lease revenue is recognized only to the extent a payment is received.  Payments are generally applied first to outstanding interest and then to the unpaid principal balance.

Determination of Residual Value

Residual values of lease contracts are estimated at lease inception by examining external industry data, the anticipated Toyota, Lexus and Scion product pipeline and our own experience.  Factors considered in this evaluation include, but are not limited to, local, regional and national economic forecasts, new vehicle pricing, new vehicle incentive programs, new vehicle sales, future plans for new Toyota, Lexus and Scion product introductions, competitor actions and behavior, product attributes of popular vehicles, the mix of used vehicle supply, the level of current used vehicle values, buying and leasing behavior trends, and fuel prices.  We use various channels to sell vehicles returned at lease-end.

On a quarterly basis, we review the estimated end-of-term market values of leased vehicles to assess the appropriateness of the carrying values at lease-end.  To the extent the estimated end-of-term market value of a leased vehicle is lower than the residual value established at lease inception, the residual value of the leased vehicle is adjusted downward, thereby adjusting depreciation expense, so that the carrying value at lease end will approximate the estimated end-of-term market value.  Factors affecting the estimated end-of-term market value are similar to those considered in the evaluation of residual values at lease inception discussed above.  These factors are evaluated in the context of their historical trends to anticipate potential future changes in the relationship among these factors.  For investments in operating leases, adjustments to depreciation expense are made prospectively on a straight-line basis over the remaining terms of the leases and are included in Depreciation on operating leases in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  For direct finance leases, adjustments are made at the time of assessment and are recorded as a reduction of direct finance lease revenues.  These adjustments for direct finance leases were not material for the periods presented in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

We review our investments in operating leases for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the investments in operating leases may not be recoverable.  If such events or changes in circumstances are present, we perform a test for recoverability by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows (including expected residual values) over the remaining lease terms to the carrying value of the asset group.  If the test for recoverability identifies a possible impairment, the asset group's fair value is measured in accordance with the fair value measurement framework.  An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset group exceeds its estimated fair value and is recorded in the current period Consolidated Statement of Income.

See Note 5 – Investments in Operating Leases, Net for additional discussion and disclosure.

81


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Used Vehicles Held for Sale

Used vehicles held for sale, reported in Other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, consist of off-lease vehicles and repossessed vehicles. ��These vehicles are recorded at the lower of their carrying value or estimated fair value less costs to sell.  These vehicles are sold promptly after grounding or repossession.

Debt Issuance Costs

Costs that are direct and incremental to debt issuance are capitalized and amortized to interest expense on an effective yield basis over the contractual term of the debt.  These costs are reported in Other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  All other costs related to debt issuance are expensed as incurred.  

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  If quoted prices in an active market are available, fair value is determined by reference to these prices.  If quoted prices are not available, fair value is determined by valuation models that primarily use, as inputs, market-based or independently sourced parameters, including but not limited to interest rates, volatilities, foreign exchange rates and credit curves.  Additionally, we may reference prices for similar instruments, quoted prices or recent transactions in less active markets.  We use prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market disruption.  In periods of market disruption, the availability of prices and inputs may be reduced for certain financial instruments.  This condition could result in a financial instrument being reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level 3.

Level 1:  Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2:  Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and may require significant judgment in order to determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities.

The use of observable and unobservable inputs is reflected in the fair value hierarchy assessment disclosed in the tables within this document.  The availability of observable inputs can vary based upon the financial instrument and other factors, such as instrument type, market liquidity and other specific characteristics particular to the financial instrument.  To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires additional judgment by management.  The degree of unobservable inputs can result in financial instruments being classified as or transferred to the Level 3 category.

82


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Valuation Methods

We maintain policies and procedures to value financial instruments using the best and most relevant data available.  Our Treasury Risk and Analytics Group (“TR&A”) is responsible for determining the fair value of our financial instruments.  TR&A consists of quantitative analysts and risk and accounting professionals.  Using benchmarking techniques, TR&A reviews our valuation pricing models at least annually to assess their ongoing propriety.  As markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more or less transparent, TR&A refines its valuation methodologies.  TR&A reviews the appropriateness of fair value measurements including validation processes, key model inputs, and the reconciliation of period-over-period fluctuations based on changes in key market inputs.  Where possible, valuations, including both internally and externally obtained transaction prices, are validated against independent valuation sources.  Our Fair Value Working Group (“FVWG”) reviews and approves the fair value measurement results and other relevant data quarterly.  The FVWG consists of a cross-section of internal stakeholders who are knowledgeable in the area of financial valuations.  All changes to our valuation methodologies are reviewed and approved by the FVWG.

We conduct reviews of our primary pricing vendors to understand and assess the reasonableness of inputs used in their pricing process. While we do not have access to our vendors’ proprietary models, we perform detailed reviews of the pricing process, methodologies and control procedures for each asset class for which prices are provided.  Our reviews include examination of the underlying inputs and assumptions for a sample of individual securities selected based on the nature and complexity of the securities.  In addition, our pricing vendors have established processes in place for all valuations, which facilitates identification and resolution of potentially erroneous prices.  We believe that the prices received from our pricing vendors, which represent fair value, are representative of prices that would be received to sell the assets or paid to transfer the liabilities at the measurement date and are classified appropriately in the hierarchy.

Valuation Adjustments

We may make valuation adjustments to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, our own creditworthiness, as well as constraints due to market illiquidity or unobservable parameters.

Counterparty Credit Valuation Adjustments – Adjustments are required when the market price (or parameter) is not indicative of the credit quality of the counterparty.

Non-Performance Credit Valuation Adjustments – Adjustments reflect our own non-performance risk when our liabilities are measured at fair value.

Liquidity Valuation Adjustments – Adjustments are necessary when we are unable to observe prices for a financial instrument due to market illiquidity.


83


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include money market instruments, U.S. government and agency obligations and certificates of deposit, which represent highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at purchase.  Where money market instruments produce a daily net asset value in an active market, we use this value to determine the fair value of the investment and classify the investment in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.  All other types of cash equivalents are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Investments in Marketable Securities

The marketable securities portfolio consists of debt and equity securities.  We estimate the value of our debt securities using observed transaction prices, independent pricing vendors, and internal pricing models.

Pricing methodologies and inputs to valuation models used by the pricing vendors depend on the security type.  Where possible, quoted prices in active markets for identical securities are used to determine the fair value of the investment securities; these securities are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.  Where quoted prices in active markets are not available, the pricing vendor uses various pricing models for each asset class that are consistent with what market participants use.  The inputs and assumptions to the models of the pricing vendors are derived from market observable sources including: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and other market-related data.  Since many fixed income securities do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing vendors use applicable available information, such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of similar securities, sector groupings, and matrix pricing.  These investments are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.  Our pricing vendors may provide us with valuations that are based on significant unobservable inputs; in such circumstances, we classify these investments in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  Valuations obtained from third party pricing vendors are validated to assess their reasonableness.

We hold investments in actively traded open-end equity and fixed income mutual funds, as well as private placement fixed income mutual funds.  Where the funds produce a daily net asset value that is quoted in an active market, we use this value to determine the fair value of the fund investment and classify the investment in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.  Where the funds produce a daily net asset value that is not quoted in an active market, we estimate the fair value of the investment using the net asset value per share and we classify such funds in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as we have the ability to redeem our investment at the net asset value per share at the measurement date.

Derivatives

We estimate the fair value of our derivatives using industry standard valuation models that require observable market inputs, including market prices, yield curves, credit curves, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, volatilities and the contractual terms of the derivative instruments.  For derivatives that trade in liquid markets, model inputs can generally be verified and do not require significant management judgment.  These derivative instruments are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Certain other derivative transactions trade in less liquid markets with limited pricing information.  For such derivatives, key inputs to the valuation process include quotes from counterparties and other market data used to corroborate and adjust values where appropriate.  Other market data includes values obtained from a market participant that serves as a third party pricing vendor.  Inputs obtained from counterparties and third party pricing vendors are internally validated using valuation models to assess the reasonableness of changes in factors such as market prices, yield curves, credit curves, interest rates, foreign exchange rates and volatilities.  These derivative instruments are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Our derivative fair value measurements consider assumptions about counterparty credit risk and our own non-performance risk.  We consider counterparty credit risk and our own non-performance risk through credit valuation adjustments.


84


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

Impaired Dealer Finance Receivables

For finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment for which there is evidence of impairment, we may measure impairment based on discounted cash flows, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the underlying collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent.  If the loan is collateral-dependent, the fair values of impaired finance receivables are reported at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  The methods used to estimate the fair value of the underlying collateral depends on the specific class of finance receivable.  For finance receivables within the wholesale class of finance receivables, the collateral value is generally based on wholesale market value or liquidation value for new and used vehicles.  For finance receivables within the real estate class of finance receivables, the collateral value is generally based on appraisals.  For finance receivables within the working capital class of finance receivables, the collateral value is generally based on the expected liquidation value of the underlying dealership assets.  Adjustments may be performed in circumstances where market comparables are not specific to the attributes of the specific collateral or appraisal information may not be reflective of current market conditions due to the passage of time and the occurrence of market events since receipt of the information.  As these valuations utilize unobservable inputs, our impaired finance receivables are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Impaired Retail Receivables

Retail finance receivables greater than 120 days past due are measured at fair value based on the fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell.  The fair value of collateral is based on the current average selling prices for like vehicles at wholesale used vehicle auctions.  Vehicles are sold promptly upon repossession.

Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value

Finance Receivables

Our finance receivables consist of retail loans, comprised of retail and commercial loan contracts, and dealer financing, comprised of wholesale, real estate and working capital financing.  Retail finance receivables are primarily valued using a securitization model that incorporates expected cash flows.  Cash flows expected to be collected are estimated using contractual principal and interest payments adjusted for specific factors, such as prepayments, default rates, loss severity, credit scores, and collateral type.  The securitization model utilizes quoted secondary market rates if available, or estimated market rates that incorporate management's best estimate of investor assumptions about the portfolio.  The dealer financing portfolio is valued using a discounted cash flow model.  Discount rates are derived based on market rates for equivalent portfolio bond ratings.  As these valuations utilize unobservable inputs, our finance receivables are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Commercial Paper

The carrying value of commercial paper issued is assumed to approximate fair value due to its short duration and generally negligible credit risk.  We validate this assumption by recalculating the fair value of our commercial paper using quoted market rates.  Commercial paper is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

85


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Unsecured Notes and Loans Payable

Unsecured notes and loans payable are primarily valued using current market rates and credit spreads for debt with similar maturities.  Our valuation models utilize observable inputs such as standard industry curves; therefore, we classify these unsecured notes and loans payables in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.  Where observable inputs are not available, we use quoted market prices to estimate the fair value of unsecured notes and loans payable.  These unsecured notes and loans payable are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy since the market for these instruments is not active.  In a limited number of instances, where neither observable inputs nor quoted market prices are available, we estimate the fair value of unsecured notes and loans payable using quotes from counterparties or a third party pricing vendor.  We review the appropriateness of these fair value measurements by assessing the reasonableness of period over period fluctuations.  Since the valuations utilize unobservable inputs, we classify these unsecured notes and loans payable in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Secured Notes and Loans Payable

Fair value is estimated based on current market rates and credit spreads for debt with similar maturities.  We also use internal assumptions, including prepayment speeds and expected credit losses on the underlying securitized assets, to estimate the timing of cash flows to be paid on these instruments.  As these valuations utilize unobservable inputs, our secured notes and loans payables are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

See Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements for additional discussion and disclosure.

Derivative Instruments

All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow us to net settle asset and liability positions and offset cash collateral held with the same counterparty on a net basis.  Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

We categorize derivatives as those designated for hedge accounting (“hedge accounting derivatives”) and those that are not designated for hedge accounting (“non-hedge accounting derivatives”).  At the inception of a derivative contract, we may elect to designate a derivative as a hedge accounting derivative if certain criteria are met.  Hedge accounting derivatives are not widely used as a part of our risk management strategy.

Hedge Accounting Derivatives

We use derivatives to reduce the risk of changes in the fair value of debt. We have designated certain derivatives as hedge accounting derivatives.  In these instances, the risk being hedged is the risk of changes in the fair value of the hedged debt attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate.

In order to qualify for hedge accounting, a derivative must be considered highly effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged.  When we designate a derivative in a hedging relationship, we contemporaneously document the risk management objective and strategy.  This documentation includes the identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item and the risk exposure, how we will assess effectiveness prospectively and retrospectively, and how often we will carry out this assessment.

We use the “long-haul” method of assessing effectiveness for our fair value hedges, except for certain types of existing hedge relationships that meet stringent criteria where we apply the shortcut method.  The shortcut method provides an assumption of zero ineffectiveness that results in equal and offsetting changes in fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Income for both the hedged debt and the hedge accounting derivative. When the shortcut method is not applied, any ineffective portion of the derivative that is designated as a fair value hedge is recognized as a component of Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  We recognize changes in the fair value of derivatives designated in fair value hedging relationships (including foreign currency fair value hedging relationships) in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income along with the fair value changes of the related hedged item.

86


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

If we elect not to designate a derivative instrument in a hedging relationship, the full change in the fair value of the derivative instrument is recognized as a component of Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income with no offsetting adjustment for the economically hedged item.

We review the effectiveness of our hedging relationships at least quarterly to determine whether the relationships have been and continue to be effective.  We use regression analysis to assess the effectiveness of our hedges.  When we determine that a hedging relationship is not or has not been effective, hedge accounting is no longer applied.  If hedge accounting is discontinued, we continue to carry the derivative instrument as a component of Other assets or Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  Additionally, for discontinued fair value hedges, we cease to adjust the hedged item for changes in fair value and amortize the cumulative fair value adjustments recognized in prior periods over the remaining term of the hedged item.

We will also discontinue the use of hedge accounting if a derivative is sold, terminated, or if management determines that designating a derivative under hedge accounting is no longer deemed appropriate based on current investment strategy (“de-designated derivatives”).  De-designated derivatives are included within the category of non-hedge accounting derivatives.

Non-hedge accounting derivatives

Our non-hedge accounting derivatives are carried at fair value.  The full change in the fair value of the derivative instrument is recognized as a component of Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income with no offsetting adjustment for the economically hedged item.  The derivative instrument is included as a component of Other assets or Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Embedded Derivatives

Periodically, we issue debt instruments which are considered “hybrid financial instruments”.  These debt instruments are assessed to determine whether they contain embedded derivatives requiring separate reporting and accounting.  The embedded derivative may be bifurcated and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value or the entire financial instrument may be recorded at fair value. As applicable, changes in the fair value of the bifurcated embedded derivative or the entire hybrid financial instrument are reported in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

We had no embedded derivatives that needed to be bifurcated and evaluated separately as of March 31, 2016 and 2015.  

Offsetting of Derivatives

The accounting guidance permits the net presentation on the Consolidated Balance Sheet of derivative receivables and derivative payables with the same counterparty and the related cash collateral when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists.  When we meet this condition, we elect to present such balances on a net basis.  

We use master netting agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk in derivative transactions.  A master netting agreement is a contract with a counterparty that permits multiple transactions governed by that contract to be cancelled and settled with a single net balance paid to either party in the event of default or other termination event outside the normal course of business, such as a ratings downgrade of either party to the contract.

Our reciprocal collateral agreements require the transfer of cash collateral to the party in a net asset position across all transactions governed by the master netting agreement.  Our collateral agreements with substantially all our counterparties include a zero threshold, full collateralization arrangement.  Upon default, the collateral agreement grants the party in a net asset position the right to set-off amounts receivable against any posted collateral.

See Note 7 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense for additional discussion and disclosure.

87


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Foreign Currency Transactions

Certain transactions we have entered into related to debt are denominated in foreign currencies.  If the debt is not in a designated hedge accounting relationship, the debt is translated into U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate at the transaction date and retranslated at each balance sheet date using the exchange rate in effect at that date.  Gains and losses related to foreign currency transactions are included in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  Payments on debt in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows include repayment of principal and the net amount of exchange of notional on currency swaps that economically hedge these transactions.  Proceeds from issuance of debt in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows include both the proceeds from the initial issuance of debt and the net amount of exchange of notional on currency swaps that economically hedge these transactions.

Risk Transfer

Our insurance operations transfer certain risks to protect us against the impact of unpredictable high severity losses.  The amounts recoverable from reinsurers and other companies that assume liabilities relating to our insurance operations are determined in a manner consistent with the related reinsurance or risk transfer agreement.  Amounts recoverable from reinsurers and other companies on unpaid losses are recorded as a receivable but are not collectible until the losses are paid.  Revenues related to risks transferred are recognized on the same basis as the related revenues from the underlying agreements.  Covered losses are recorded as a reduction to insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses.

Income Taxes

We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in tax rates and laws in the period such changes are enacted resulting in adjustments to the current fiscal year’s provision for income taxes.

TMCC files a consolidated federal income tax return with its subsidiaries and TFSA.  TMCC files either separate or consolidated/combined state income tax returns with Toyota Motor North America (“TMNA”), TFSA, or subsidiaries of TMCC.  State income tax expense is generally recognized as if TMCC and its subsidiaries filed their tax returns on a stand-alone basis.  In those states where TMCC and its subsidiaries join in the filing of consolidated or combined income tax returns, TMCC and its subsidiaries are allocated their share of the total income tax expense based on combined allocation/apportionment factors and separate company income or loss.  Based on the federal and state tax sharing agreements, TFSA and TMCC and its subsidiaries pay for their share of the income tax expense and are reimbursed for the benefit of any of their tax losses utilized in the federal and state income tax returns.

88


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

New Accounting Guidance

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance on recognition of revenue from contracts with customers.  This comprehensive standard will supersede virtually all existing revenue recognition guidance.  This standard applies to all contracts with customers except leases, insurance contracts, financial instruments, guarantees, and certain nonmonetary exchanges.  In August 2015, the FASB issued a one-year deferral of the effective date, with early adoption as of the original effective date permitted. We expect to adopt the new guidance on its deferred effective date, which is April 1, 2018 for TMCC.  We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that amends the analysis a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain legal entities.  This accounting guidance is effective for us on April 1, 2016.  The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of being presented as an asset.  In August 2015, the FASB issued an additional update which clarifies that debt issuance costs for line of credit agreements may continue to be deferred and amortized.  This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2016.   The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance to help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement.  While similar guidance exists under current U.S. GAAP for cloud service providers, this update provides explicit guidance for a customer's accounting.  This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2016.   The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient.  This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2016.   The adoption of this guidance is limited to footnote disclosure and will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that requires additional disclosures related to short-duration insurance contracts.  This accounting guidance will be effective for us for the annual period beginning April 1, 2016 and for interim periods within annual periods beginning April 1, 2017.   We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments and will require entities to measure equity investments at fair value and recognize any changes in fair value in net income.  This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2018.   We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet and aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in the new revenue recognition standard. The new lease standard represents a wholesale change to lease accounting.  This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2019.   We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.


89


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a designated derivative hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require de-designation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.  This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2017.   We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which clarifies whether an embedded contingent put or call option is clearly and closely related to the debt host when bifurcating an embedded derivative. This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2017.   We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations in the new revenue recognition standard discussed above. This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2018.   We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that amends the guidance on identifying performance obligations and accounting for licenses of intellectual property in the new revenue standard discussed above.  This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2018.  We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that amends the guidance on certain implementation and transition issues in the new revenue recognition standard discussed above.  This accounting guidance will be effective for us on April 1, 2018.  We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In April 2015, new FASB accounting guidance became effective that amends the requirements for the reporting of discontinued operations and requires certain additional disclosures. Under the new guidance, only disposals that represent a strategic shift and that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results should be presented as discontinued operations.  This guidance was adopted by us in August 2015 when we reclassified certain assets and liabilities related to our commercial finance business as held-for-sale.  Our adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


90


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements

Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The following tables summarize our financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy.  

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

netting &

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

collateral

 

 

value

 

Cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market instruments

 

$

360

 

 

$

1,209

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

1,569

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

 

450

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

555

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

-

 

 

 

500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

500

 

Cash equivalents total

 

 

810

 

 

 

1,814

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,624

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

 

2,777

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,835

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

11

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

300

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

500

 

Commercial paper

 

 

-

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

50

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

228

 

 

 

252

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

487

 

Mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency

 

 

-

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

59

 

Non-agency residential

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3

 

Non-agency commercial

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

42

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37

 

Equity instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income mutual funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term floating NAV fund II

 

 

-

 

 

 

178

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

178

 

U.S. government sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

358

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

358

 

Municipal sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

19

 

Investment grade corporate sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

246

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

246

 

High-yield sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

66

 

Real return sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

212

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

212

 

Mortgage sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

302

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

302

 

Asset-backed securities sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

124

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

124

 

Emerging market sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

102

 

International sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

140

 

Total return bond funds

 

 

380

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

380

 

Equity mutual fund

 

 

389

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

389

 

Available-for-sale securities total

 

 

4,074

 

 

 

2,375

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,540

 

Derivative assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

329

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

329

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

601

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

640

 

Interest rate floors

 

 

-

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4

 

Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(905

)

 

 

(905

)

Derivative assets total

 

 

-

 

 

 

934

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

(905

)

 

 

68

 

Assets at fair value

 

 

4,884

 

 

 

5,123

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

(905

)

 

 

9,232

 

Derivative liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

(821

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(835

)

Interest rate swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

(475

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(475

)

Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,303

 

 

 

1,303

 

Liabilities at fair value

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,296

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

1,303

 

 

 

(7

)

Net assets at fair value

 

$

4,884

 

 

$

3,827

 

 

$

116

 

 

$

398

 

 

$

9,225

 


91


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Derivative assets were reduced by a counterparty credit valuation adjustment of $2 million and $1 million as of March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  Derivative liabilities were reduced by a non-performance credit valuation adjustment of less than $1 million as of March 31, 2015.

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

netting &

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

collateral

 

 

value

 

Cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market instruments

 

$

249

 

 

$

820

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

1,069

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

 

40

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

40

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,105

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,105

 

Cash equivalents total

 

 

289

 

 

 

1,925

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,214

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

 

4,215

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,359

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

12

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

-

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

175

 

Commercial paper

 

 

37

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

145

 

Mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency

 

 

-

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

59

 

Non-agency residential

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4

 

Non-agency commercial

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

44

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

39

 

Equity instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income mutual funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term floating NAV fund II

 

 

-

 

 

 

148

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

148

 

Short-term sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37

 

U.S. government sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

335

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

335

 

Municipal sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

20

 

Investment grade corporate sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

268

 

High-yield sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

55

 

Real return sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

232

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

232

 

Mortgage sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

399

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

399

 

Asset-backed securities sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

72

 

Emerging market sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

71

 

International sector fund

 

 

-

 

 

 

160

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

160

 

Equity mutual fund

 

 

460

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

460

 

Available-for-sale securities total

 

 

4,712

 

 

 

2,316

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7,131

 

Derivative assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

217

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

470

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

471

 

Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(635

)

 

 

(635

)

Derivative assets total

 

 

-

 

 

 

680

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

(635

)

 

 

53

 

Assets at fair value

 

 

5,001

 

 

 

4,921

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

(635

)

 

 

9,398

 

Derivative liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,888

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,888

)

Interest rate swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

(386

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(386

)

Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,184

 

 

 

2,184

 

Liabilities at fair value

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2,274

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,184

 

 

 

(90

)

Net assets at fair value

 

$

5,001

 

 

$

2,647

 

 

$

111

 

 

$

1,549

 

 

$

9,308

 


92


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized at the end of their respective reporting periods.  During fiscal 2016, $85 million was transferred from Level 2 to Level 1, $47 million was transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 and $4 million was transferred from Level 3 to Level 2.  During fiscal 2015, certain corporate debt securities were transferred from Level 2 to Level 3.  The transfers in fiscal 2016 and 2015 were due to changes in the transparency of inputs for determination of fair value for these instruments.

The following tables summarize the reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs:

 

 

Year Ended March 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

assets

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities

 

 

Derivative instruments, net

 

 

(liabilities)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

government

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Mortgage-

 

 

Asset-

 

 

available-

 

 

Interest

 

 

Foreign

 

 

derivative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and agency

 

 

debt

 

 

backed

 

 

backed

 

 

for-sale

 

 

rate

 

 

currency

 

 

assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

obligations

 

 

securities

 

 

securities

 

 

securities

 

 

securities

 

 

swaps

 

 

swaps

 

 

(liabilities)

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value, April 1, 2015

 

$

2

 

 

$

14

 

 

$

48

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

8

 

 

$

111

 

Total gains (losses)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in earnings

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

(13

)

 

 

21

 

 

 

21

 

Included in other comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4

)

Purchases, issuances, sales, and settlements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

7

 

Issuances

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Sales

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3

)

Settlements

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

4

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(12

)

Transfers in to Level 3

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Transfers out of Level 3

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4

)

Fair value, March 31, 2016

 

$

2

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

45

 

 

$

37

 

 

$

91

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

(14

)

 

$

25

 

 

$

116

 

The amount of total gains      (losses) included in earnings attributable to assets held at the reporting date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

34

 

 

$

(13

)

 

$

21

 

 

$

21

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

assets

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities

 

 

Derivative instruments, net

 

 

(liabilities)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

government

 

 

Corporate

 

 

Mortgage-

 

 

Asset-

 

 

available-

 

 

Interest

 

 

Foreign

 

 

derivative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and agency

 

 

debt

 

 

backed

 

 

backed

 

 

for-sale

 

 

rate

 

 

currency

 

 

assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

obligations

 

 

securities

 

 

securities

 

 

securities

 

 

securities

 

 

swaps

 

 

swaps

 

 

(liabilities)

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value, April 1, 2014

 

$

2

 

 

$

12

 

 

$

48

 

 

$

27

 

 

$

89

 

 

$

3

 

 

$

70

 

 

$

73

 

 

$

162

 

Total (losses)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in earnings

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(54

)

 

 

(54

)

 

 

(54

)

Included in other comprehensive income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

Purchases, issuances, sales, and settlements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 

-

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37

 

Issuances

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Sales

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(15

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(15

)

Settlements

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(12

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(23

)

Transfers in to Level 3

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

Transfers out of Level 3

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Fair value, March 31, 2015

 

$

2

 

 

$

14

 

 

$

48

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

8

 

 

$

111

 

The amount of total (losses)

  included in earnings

  attributable to assets held

  at the reporting date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

(54

)

 

$

(54

)

 

$

(54

)


93


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

Nonrecurring fair value measurements include Level 3 net finance receivables that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments utilizing the fair value of the underlying collateral when there is evidence of impairment.  We did not have any significant nonrecurring fair value items as of March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

The Level 3 financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value which are subject to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurement, and the corresponding change in the fair value measurements of these assets and liabilities, were not significant to our Consolidated Balance Sheet or Consolidated Statement of Income as of and for the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

94


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Financial Instruments

The following tables provide information about assets and liabilities not carried at fair value on a recurring basis on our Consolidated Balance Sheet:

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Fair

 

 

 

value

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

$

49,865

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

49,551

 

 

$

49,551

 

Wholesale

 

 

9,160

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,207

 

 

 

9,207

 

Real estate

 

 

4,590

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,277

 

 

 

4,277

 

Working capital

 

 

1,888

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,894

 

 

 

1,894

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial paper

 

$

26,608

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

26,608

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

26,608

 

Unsecured notes and loans payable

 

 

52,978

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

52,913

 

 

 

1,387

 

 

 

54,300

 

Secured notes and loans payable

 

 

14,139

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

14,125

 

 

 

14,125

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Fair

 

 

 

value

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

$

49,734

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

49,887

 

 

$

49,887

 

Commercial

 

 

217

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

223

 

 

 

223

 

Wholesale

 

 

9,123

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,176

 

 

 

9,176

 

Real estate

 

 

4,602

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,564

 

 

 

4,564

 

Working capital

 

 

1,815

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,804

 

 

 

1,804

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial paper

 

$

27,006

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

27,006

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

27,006

 

Unsecured notes and loans payable

 

 

52,388

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

53,174

 

 

 

634

 

 

 

53,808

 

Secured notes and loans payable

 

 

10,837

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,832

 

 

 

10,832

 

The carrying value of each class of finance receivables includes accrued interest and deferred fees and costs, net of deferred income and the allowance for credit losses.  The finance receivables, net amount excludes related party transactions, for which the fair value approximates the carrying value, of $128 million and $94 million at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and direct finance leases of $308 million at March 31, 2015.  The majority of our direct finance leases were related to the commercial finance business, which was sold on October 1, 2015.  As a result, direct finance leases excluded from finance receivables, net were not significant at March 31, 2016.

The carrying value of unsecured notes and loans payable represents the sum of unsecured notes and loans payable and carrying value adjustment as described in Note 9 – Debt of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

95


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 3 – Investments in Marketable Securities

We classify all of our investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale.  The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments in marketable securities and related unrealized gains and losses were as follows:

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

cost

 

 

gains

 

 

losses

 

 

value

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

$

2,833

 

 

$

3

 

 

$

(1

)

 

$

2,835

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

10

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

11

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

500

 

Commercial paper

 

 

50

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

50

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

482

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

487

 

Mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency

 

 

57

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

59

 

Non-agency residential

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3

 

Non-agency commercial

 

 

42

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

42

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

38

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

37

 

Equity instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income mutual funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term floating NAV fund II

 

 

178

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

178

 

U.S. government sector fund

 

 

353

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

358

 

Municipal sector fund

 

 

19

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

19

 

Investment grade corporate sector fund

 

 

243

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

246

 

High-yield sector fund

 

 

67

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

66

 

Real return sector fund

 

 

201

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

212

 

Mortgage sector fund

 

 

297

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

302

 

Asset-backed securities sector fund

 

 

117

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

124

 

Emerging market sector fund

 

 

101

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

102

 

International sector fund

 

 

145

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

140

 

Total return bond funds

 

 

376

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

380

 

Equity mutual fund

 

 

162

 

 

 

227

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

389

 

Total investments in marketable securities

 

$

6,273

 

 

$

285

 

 

$

(18

)

 

$

6,540

 

96


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 3 – Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

cost

 

 

gains

 

 

losses

 

 

value

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

$

4,357

 

 

$

3

 

 

$

(1

)

 

$

4,359

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

10

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

12

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

175

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

175

 

Commercial paper

 

 

37

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

138

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

145

 

Mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency

 

 

57

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

59

 

Non-agency residential

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4

 

Non-agency commercial

 

 

43

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

44

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

39

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

39

 

Equity instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income mutual funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term floating NAV fund II

 

 

148

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

148

 

Short-term sector fund

 

 

35

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

37

 

U.S. government sector fund

 

 

311

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

335

 

Municipal sector fund

 

 

19

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

20

 

Investment grade corporate sector fund

 

 

256

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

268

 

High-yield sector fund

 

 

50

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

55

 

Real return sector fund

 

 

235

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

232

 

Mortgage sector fund

 

 

390

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

399

 

Asset-backed securities sector fund

 

 

63

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

72

 

Emerging market sector fund

 

 

73

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

71

 

International sector fund

 

 

146

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

160

 

Equity mutual fund

 

 

190

 

 

 

270

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

460

 

Total investments in marketable securities

 

$

6,775

 

 

$

366

 

 

$

(10

)

 

$

7,131

 

The Fixed income mutual funds, exclusive of the Total return bond funds, are investments in funds that are privately placed and managed by an open-end investment management company (the “Trust”).  If we elect to redeem shares, the Trust will normally redeem all shares for cash, but may, in unusual circumstances, redeem amounts exceeding the lesser of $250 thousand or 1 percent of the Trust’s asset value by payment in kind of securities held by the respective fund during any 90-day period.

The Total return bond funds are investments in actively traded open-end mutual funds.  Redemptions are subject to normal terms and conditions as described in each fund’s prospectus.


97


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 3 – Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

Unrealized Losses on Securities

Investments in marketable securities in a consecutive loss position for less than twelve months and for greater than twelve months were not significant at March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Realized Gains and Losses on Securities

The following table represents realized gains and losses by transaction type:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized gains on sales

 

$

59

 

 

$

71

 

 

$

59

 

Realized losses on sales

 

$

(3

)

 

$

(1

)

 

$

(4

)

Other-than-temporary impairment

 

$

(50

)

 

$

-

 

 

$

(55

)

The other-than-temporary impairment write-downs of $50 million and $55 million during the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2014, respectively, were related to our fixed income mutual funds.  Other-than-temporary impairment write-downs were not significant during the year ended March 31, 2015.

Contractual Maturities

The amortized cost, fair value and contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt instruments are summarized in the following table.  Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay certain obligations.

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

Amortized Cost

 

 

Fair Value

 

Available-for-sale debt instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due within 1 year

 

$

2,664

 

 

$

2,665

 

Due after 1 year through 5 years

 

 

1,044

 

 

 

1,047

 

Due after 5 years through 10 years

 

 

71

 

 

 

72

 

Due after 10 years

 

 

96

 

 

 

99

 

Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities1

 

 

139

 

 

 

141

 

Total

 

$

4,014

 

 

$

4,024

 

1 Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are shown separately from other maturity groupings as these securities do not have a single maturity date.

98


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net

Finance receivables, net consist of retail receivables and dealer financing, which includes accrued interest and deferred fees and costs, net of the allowance for credit losses and deferred income.  Finance receivables, net include securitized retail receivables, which represent retail receivables that have been sold for legal purposes to securitization trusts but continue to be included in our consolidated financial statements, as discussed further in Note 10 – Variable Interest Entities.  Cash flows from these securitized retail receivables are available only for the repayment of debt issued by these trusts and other obligations arising from the securitization transactions.  They are not available for payment of our other obligations or to satisfy claims of our other creditors.

Finance receivables, net consisted of the following:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Retail receivables

 

$

36,020

 

 

$

39,141

 

Securitized retail receivables

 

 

14,343

 

 

 

11,682

 

Dealer financing

 

 

15,899

 

 

 

15,744

 

 

 

 

66,262

 

 

 

66,567

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred origination (fees) and costs, net

 

 

663

 

 

 

646

 

Deferred income

 

 

(868

)

 

 

(911

)

Allowance for credit losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail and securitized retail receivables

 

 

(289

)

 

 

(301

)

Dealer financing

 

 

(132

)

 

 

(108

)

Total allowance for credit losses

 

 

(421

)

 

 

(409

)

Finance receivables, net

 

$

65,636

 

 

$

65,893

 

On October 1, 2015, $1.1 billion of finance receivables, net related to our commercial finance business were sold to TICF, consisting primarily of $546 million of commercial loan receivables, $490 million of wholesale receivables, $53 million of real estate receivables, and $16 million of working capital receivables.  

Contractual maturities on retail receivables and dealer financing are as follows:

 

 

Contractual maturities

 

Years ending March 31,

 

Retail receivables

 

 

Dealer financing

 

2017

 

$

14,337

 

 

$

11,773

 

2018

 

 

12,902

 

 

 

1,608

 

2019

 

 

10,399

 

 

 

906

 

2020

 

 

7,338

 

 

 

532

 

2021

 

 

4,006

 

 

 

501

 

Thereafter

 

 

1,381

 

 

 

579

 

Total

 

$

50,363

 

 

$

15,899

 

Retail receivables presented in the previous tables include direct finance leases which were primarily related to our commercial finance business.�� Direct finance leases totaled $308 million at March 31, 2015.  The amount of direct finance leases was insignificant at March 31, 2016.  

A significant portion of our finance receivables has historically settled prior to contractual maturity.  Contractual maturities shown above should not be considered indicative of future cash collections.


99


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Credit Quality Indicators

We are exposed to credit risk on our finance receivables.  Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the failure of customers or dealers to meet the terms of their contracts with us or otherwise fail to perform as agreed.

Retail Loan and Commercial Portfolio Segments

Retail loan and commercial portfolio segments each consist of one class of finance receivables.  While we use various credit quality metrics to develop our allowance for credit losses on the retail loan and commercial portfolio segments, we primarily utilize the aging of the individual accounts to monitor the credit quality of these finance receivables.  Based on our experience, the payment status of borrowers is the strongest indicator of the credit quality of the underlying receivables.  Payment status also impacts charge-offs.

Individual borrower accounts for each class of finance receivables within the retail loan and commercial portfolio segments are segregated into aging categories based on the number of days outstanding.  The aging for each class of finance receivables is updated monthly.

As discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, on October 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our commercial finance business to TICF. As a result of this sale, subsequent to October 1, 2015, we no longer have a commercial portfolio segment.

Dealer Products Portfolio Segment

For the three classes of finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment (wholesale, real estate and working capital), all loans outstanding for an individual dealer or dealer group, which includes affiliated entities, are aggregated and evaluated collectively by dealer or dealer group.  This reflects the interconnected nature of financing provided to our individual dealer and dealer group customers, and their affiliated entities.

When assessing the credit quality of the finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment, we segregate the finance receivables account balances into four categories representing distinct credit quality indicators based on internal risk assessments. The internal risk assessments for all finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment are updated on a monthly basis.

The four credit quality indicators are:

·

Performing – Account not classified as either Credit Watch, At Risk or Default

·

Credit Watch – Account designated for elevated attention

·

At Risk – Account where there is an increased likelihood that default may exist based on qualitative and quantitative factors

·

Default – Account is not currently meeting contractual obligations or we have temporarily waived certain contractual requirements


100


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

The tables below present each credit quality indicator by class of finance receivables:

 

 

Retail Loan

 

 

Commercial

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Aging of finance receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

49,590

 

 

$

49,684

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

511

 

30-59 days past due

 

 

584

 

 

 

467

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

8

 

60-89 days past due

 

 

129

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2

 

90 days or greater past due

 

 

60

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

50,363

 

 

$

50,302

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

521

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

 

Real Estate

 

 

Working Capital

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Credit quality indicators:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performing

 

$

8,099

 

 

$

7,993

 

 

$

3,822

 

 

$

3,782

 

 

$

1,686

 

 

$

1,643

 

Credit Watch

 

 

1,041

 

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

763

 

 

 

842

 

 

 

229

 

 

 

176

 

At Risk

 

 

113

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

32

 

Default

 

 

9

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

Total

 

$

9,262

 

 

$

9,226

 

 

$

4,704

 

 

$

4,665

 

 

$

1,933

 

 

$

1,853

 


101


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Impaired Finance Receivables

The following table summarizes the information related to our impaired loans by class of finance receivables:

 

 

Impaired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually Evaluated

 

 

 

Finance Receivables

 

 

Unpaid Principal Balance

 

 

Allowance

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances individually evaluated for impairment with an allowance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

$

98

 

 

$

76

 

 

$

98

 

 

$

76

 

 

$

9

 

 

$

14

 

Real estate

 

 

119

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

10

 

Working capital

 

 

37

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

31

 

Total

 

$

254

 

 

$

162

 

 

$

254

 

 

$

162

 

 

$

54

 

 

$

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances individually evaluated for impairment without an allowance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

$

185

 

 

$

105

 

 

$

185

 

 

$

105

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

98

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

286

 

 

$

198

 

 

$

286

 

 

$

198

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances aggregated and evaluated for impairment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

$

226

 

 

$

264

 

 

$

223

 

 

$

261

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

226

 

 

$

264

 

 

$

223

 

 

$

261

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total impaired account balances:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

$

226

 

 

$

264

 

 

$

223

 

 

$

261

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

 

283

 

 

 

181

 

 

 

283

 

 

 

181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

217

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

217

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

 

 

40

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

766

 

 

$

624

 

 

$

763

 

 

$

621

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, the impaired finance receivables balance for accounts in the dealer products portfolio segment that were on nonaccrual status was $299 million and $172 million, respectively, and there were no charge-offs against the allowance for credit losses for these finance receivables. Therefore, the impaired finance receivables balance is equal to the unpaid principal balance. As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, impaired finance receivables in the retail portfolio segment recorded at the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs were not significant and therefore excluded from the table above.   Refer to Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details about the allowance related to the impaired account balances which are aggregated and evaluated for impairment.  

102


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

The following table summarizes the average impaired loans by class of finance receivables as of the balance sheet date and the interest income recognized on these loans:

 

 

Average Impaired Finance Receivables

 

 

Interest Income Recognized

 

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances individually evaluated for impairment with an allowance:

 

Wholesale

 

$

86

 

 

$

29

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

-

 

Real estate

 

 

93

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

Working capital

 

 

35

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

Total

 

$

214

 

 

$

80

 

 

$

5

 

 

$

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances individually evaluated for impairment without an allowance:

 

Wholesale

 

$

132

 

 

$

66

 

 

$

3

 

 

$

1

 

Real estate

 

 

92

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

Working capital

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

228

 

 

$

160

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired account balances aggregated and evaluated for impairment:

 

Retail loan

 

$

246

 

 

$

294

 

 

$

18

 

 

$

22

 

Commercial

 

 

-

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

246

 

 

$

295

 

 

$

18

 

 

$

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total impaired account balances:

 

Retail loan

 

$

246

 

 

$

294

 

 

$

18

 

 

$

22

 

Commercial

 

 

-

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Wholesale

 

 

218

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

 

Real estate

 

 

185

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

4

 

Working capital

 

 

39

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

Total

 

$

688

 

 

$

535

 

 

$

30

 

 

$

28

 

The primary source of interest income recognized on the loans in the table above is from performing troubled debt restructurings.  In addition, interest income recognized using a cash-basis method of accounting during fiscal 2016 and 2015 was not significant.

103


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 4 – Finance Receivables, Net (Continued)

Troubled Debt Restructuring

For accounts not under bankruptcy protection, the amount of finance receivables modified as a troubled debt restructuring during fiscal 2016 and 2015 was not significant for each class of finance receivables.  Troubled debt restructurings for non-bankrupt accounts within the retail loan class of finance receivables are comprised exclusively of contract term extensions that reduce the monthly payment due from the customer.  Troubled debt restructurings for accounts within the commercial class of finance receivables consisted of contract term extensions, interest rate adjustments, or a combination of the two.  For the three classes of finance receivables within the dealer products portfolio segment, troubled debt restructurings include contract term extensions, interest rate adjustments, waivers of loan covenants, or any combination of the three.  Troubled debt restructurings of accounts not under bankruptcy protection did not include forgiveness of principal or interest rate adjustments during fiscal 2016 and 2015.

We consider finance receivables under bankruptcy protection within the retail loan and commercial classes to be troubled debt restructurings as of the date we receive notice of a customer filing for bankruptcy protection, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the bankruptcy proceedings.  The bankruptcy court may impose modifications as part of the proceedings, including interest rate adjustments and forgiveness of principal.  For fiscal 2016 and 2015, the financial impact of troubled debt restructurings related to finance receivables under bankruptcy protection was not significant to our Consolidated Statement of Income and Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Payment Defaults

Finance receivables modified as troubled debt restructurings for which there was a subsequent payment default during fiscal 2016 and 2015, and for which the modification occurred within twelve months of the payment default, were not significant for all classes of such receivables.

104


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 5 – Investments in Operating Leases, Net

Investments in operating leases, net consist of leases, net of deferred fees and costs, deferred income, accumulated depreciation and the allowance for credit losses.  Securitized investments in operating leases represent beneficial interests in a pool of certain vehicle leases that have been sold for legal purposes to securitization trusts but continue to be included in our consolidated financial statements as discussed further in Note 10 – Variable Interest Entities.  Cash flows from these securitized investments in operating leases are available only for the repayment of debt issued by these trusts and other obligations arising from the securitization transactions.  They are not available for payment of our other obligations or to satisfy claims of our other creditors.

Investments in operating leases, net consisted of the following:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Investments in operating leases

 

$

42,220

 

 

$

37,555

 

Securitized investments in operating leases

 

 

3,364

 

 

 

1,571

 

 

 

 

45,584

 

 

 

39,126

 

Deferred origination (fees) and costs, net

 

 

(190

)

 

 

(169

)

Deferred income

 

 

(1,080

)

 

 

(968

)

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(7,712

)

 

 

(6,785

)

Allowance for credit losses

 

 

(114

)

 

 

(76

)

Investments in operating leases, net

 

$

36,488

 

 

$

31,128

 

On October 1, 2015, investments in operating leases related to our commercial finance business of $1.0 billion were sold to TICF.

Future minimum rentals on investments in operating leases are as follows: 

Years ending March 31,

 

Future minimum

rentals on operating leases

 

2017

 

$

5,523

 

2018

 

 

3,764

 

2019

 

 

1,555

 

2020

 

 

189

 

2021

 

 

17

 

Thereafter

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

11,048

 

A portion of our operating lease contracts has historically terminated prior to maturity.  Future minimum rentals shown above should not be considered indicative of future cash collections.

As of March 31, 2016 and 2015, there was no impairment in our investment in operating leases portfolio.


105


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses

The following table provides information related to our allowance for credit losses on finance receivables and investments in operating leases:

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period

 

$

485

 

 

$

454

 

 

$

527

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

441

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

170

 

Transferred to held-for-sale1

 

 

(7

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Charge-offs, net of recoveries

 

 

(384

)

 

 

(277

)

 

 

(243

)

Allowance for credit losses at end of period

 

$

535

 

 

$

485

 

 

$

454

 

1 Amount relates to the commercial finance business which was sold on October 1, 2015.

Charge-offs are shown net of recoveries of $72 million, $86 million and $85 million for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Allowance for Credit Losses and Finance Receivables by Portfolio Segment

The following tables provide information related to our allowance for credit losses and finance receivables by portfolio segment for:

 

 

Year Ended March 31, 2016

 

 

 

Retail Loan

 

 

Commercial

 

 

Dealer Products

 

 

Total

 

Beginning balance, April 1, 2015

 

$

299

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

108

 

 

$

409

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(328

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(329

)

Recoveries

 

 

49

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

49

 

Provisions

 

 

269

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

298

 

Transferred to held-for-sale

 

 

-

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(6

)

Ending balance, March 31, 2016

 

$

289

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

132

 

 

$

421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

54

 

 

$

54

 

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

289

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

78

 

 

$

367

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance Receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance, March 31, 2016

 

$

50,363

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

15,899

 

 

$

66,262

 

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

540

 

 

$

540

 

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

50,363

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

15,359

 

 

$

65,722

 

The ending balance of finance receivables collectively evaluated for impairment in the table above includes approximately $226 million of finance receivables within the retail loan portfolio segment that are specifically identified as impaired.  These amounts are aggregated with their respective portfolio segments when determining the allowance for credit losses as of March 31, 2016, as they are deemed to be insignificant for individual evaluation and we have determined that the allowance for credit losses is not significant and would not be materially different if the amounts had been individually evaluated for impairment.  The ending balance of finance receivables for the dealer products portfolio segment collectively evaluated for impairment as of March 31, 2016 includes $982 million in finance receivables which are guaranteed by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“TMS”) and $136 million in finance receivables which are guaranteed by third party private Toyota distributors.  These finance receivables are related to certain Toyota and Lexus dealers and other third parties to whom we provided financing at the request of TMS or such private distributors.

106


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

 

 

Year Ended March 31, 2015

 

 

 

Retail Loan

 

 

Commercial

 

 

Dealer Products

 

 

Total

 

Beginning balance, April 1, 2014

 

$

296

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

88

 

 

$

386

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(273

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(276

)

Recoveries

 

 

61

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

63

 

Provisions

 

 

215

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

236

 

Ending balance, March 31, 2015

 

$

299

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

108

 

 

$

409

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

55

 

 

$

55

 

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

299

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

53

 

 

$

354

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance Receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance, March 31, 2015

 

$

50,302

 

 

$

521

 

 

$

15,744

 

 

$

66,567

 

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

360

 

 

$

360

 

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

50,302

 

 

$

521

 

 

$

15,384

 

 

$

66,207

 

The ending balance of finance receivables collectively evaluated for impairment in the table above includes approximately $264 million of finance receivables within the retail loan portfolio segment that are specifically identified as impaired.  These amounts are aggregated with their respective portfolio segments when determining the allowance for credit losses as of March 31, 2015, as they are deemed to be insignificant for individual evaluation and we have determined that the allowance for credit losses is not significant and would not be materially different if the amounts had been individually evaluated for impairment.  The ending balance of finance receivables for the dealer products portfolio segment collectively evaluated for impairment as of March 31, 2015 includes $917 million in finance receivables which are guaranteed by TMS and $122 million in finance receivables which are guaranteed by third party private Toyota distributors.  These finance receivables are related to certain Toyota and Lexus dealers and other third parties to whom we provided financing at the request of TMS or such private distributors.


107


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 6 – Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Past Due Finance Receivables and Investments in Operating Leases

The following table shows aggregate balances of finance receivables and investments in operating leases 60 or more days past due:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Aggregate balances 60 or more days past due

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables

 

$

189

 

 

$

153

 

Investments in operating leases

 

 

80

 

 

 

52

 

Total

 

$

269

 

 

$

205

 

Substantially all finance receivables and investments in operating leases do not involve recourse to the dealer in the event of customer default.  Finance receivables and investments in operating leases 60 or more days past due include contracts in bankruptcy and contracts greater than 120 days past due, which are recorded at the fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell.  Contracts for which vehicles have been repossessed are excluded.

Past Due Finance Receivables by Class

The following tables summarize the aging of finance receivables by class:

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

30 - 59 Days

Past Due

 

 

60 - 89 Days

Past Due

 

 

90 Days or

Greater

Past Due

 

 

Total Past

Due

 

 

Current

 

 

Total Finance

Receivables

 

 

90 Days or

Greater Past

Due and

Accruing

 

Retail loan

 

$

584

 

 

$

129

 

 

$

60

 

 

$

773

 

 

$

49,590

 

 

$

50,363

 

 

$

35

 

Wholesale

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,262

 

 

 

9,262

 

 

 

-

 

Real estate

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,704

 

 

 

4,704

 

 

 

-

 

Working capital

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,933

 

 

 

1,933

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

584

 

 

$

129

 

 

$

60

 

 

$

773

 

 

$

65,489

 

 

$

66,262

 

 

$

35

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

 

30 - 59 Days

Past Due

 

 

60 - 89 Days

Past Due

 

 

90 Days or

Greater

Past Due

 

 

Total Past

Due

 

 

Current

 

 

Total Finance

Receivables

 

 

90 Days or

Greater Past

Due and

Accruing

 

Retail loan

 

$

467

 

 

$

100

 

 

$

51

 

 

$

618

 

 

$

49,684

 

 

$

50,302

 

 

$

32

 

Commercial

 

 

8

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

511

 

 

 

521

 

 

 

-

 

Wholesale

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,226

 

 

 

9,226

 

 

 

-

 

Real estate

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,665

 

 

 

4,665

 

 

 

-

 

Working capital

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,853

 

 

 

1,853

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

475

 

 

$

102

 

 

$

51

 

 

$

628

 

 

$

65,939

 

 

$

66,567

 

 

$

32

 


108


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 7 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense

Derivative Instruments

Our liabilities consist mainly of fixed and floating rate debt, denominated in various currencies, which we issue in the global capital markets, while our assets consist primarily of U.S. dollar denominated, fixed rate receivables.  We enter into interest rate swaps, interest rate floors, interest rate caps and foreign currency swaps to hedge the interest rate and foreign currency risks that result from the different characteristics of our assets and liabilities.  Our use of derivative transactions is intended to reduce long-term fluctuations in the fair value of assets and liabilities caused by market movements. All of our derivative activities are authorized and monitored by our management and our Asset-Liability Committee, which provides a framework for financial controls and governance to manage market risk. 

Credit Risk Related Contingent Features

Our derivative contracts are governed by International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreements.  Substantially all of these ISDA Master Agreements contain reciprocal ratings triggers providing either party with an option to terminate the agreement at market value in the event of a ratings downgrade of the other party below a specified threshold.  As of March 31, 2016, we have daily valuation and collateral exchange arrangements with all of our counterparties.  Our collateral agreements with substantially all our counterparties include a zero threshold, full collateralization arrangement.  However, due to the time required to move collateral, there may be a delay of up to one day between the exchange of collateral and the valuation of our derivatives.

The aggregate fair value of derivative instruments that contain credit risk related contingent features that were in a net liability position at March 31, 2016 was $7 million, excluding adjustments made for our own non-performance risk.  However, we would not be required to post additional collateral to the counterparties with whom we were in a net liability position at March 31, 2016 if our credit ratings were to decline, since we fully collateralize without regard to credit ratings with these counterparties.  


109


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 7 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)

Derivative Activity Impact on Financial Statements

The following tables show the financial statement line item and amount of our derivative assets and liabilities that are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

Hedge accounting

 

 

Non-hedge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

derivatives

 

 

accounting derivatives

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

value

 

 

Notional

 

 

value

 

 

Notional

 

 

value

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

29,469

 

 

$

640

 

 

$

29,469

 

 

$

640

 

Interest rate floors

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,679

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

1,679

 

 

 

4

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

364

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

4,337

 

 

 

290

 

 

 

4,701

 

 

 

329

 

Total

 

$

364

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

35,485

 

 

$

934

 

 

$

35,849

 

 

$

973

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty netting and collateral held

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

(905

)

Carrying value of derivative

   contracts – Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

68,383

 

 

$

475

 

 

$

68,383

 

 

$

475

 

Interest rate caps

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

-

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,340

 

 

 

835

 

 

 

9,340

 

 

 

835

 

Total

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

77,753

 

 

$

1,310

 

 

$

77,753

 

 

$

1,310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty netting and collateral posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,303

)

Carrying value of derivative

   contracts – Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

7

 

As of March 31, 2016, we held collateral of $320 million which offset derivative assets, and posted collateral of $718 million which offset derivative liabilities.  We also held excess collateral of $2 million which we did not use to offset derivative assets, and we posted excess collateral of $22 million which we did not use to offset derivative liabilities.


110


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 7 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

 

Hedge accounting

 

 

Non-hedge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

derivatives

 

 

accounting derivatives

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

value

 

 

Notional

 

 

value

 

 

Notional

 

 

value

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

190

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

26,549

 

 

$

467

 

 

$

26,739

 

 

$

471

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

271

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

913

 

 

 

193

 

 

 

1,184

 

 

 

217

 

Total

 

$

461

 

 

$

28

 

 

$

27,462

 

 

$

660

 

 

$

27,923

 

 

$

688

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty netting and collateral held

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(635

)

Carrying value of derivative

   contracts – Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

53

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

64,852

 

 

$

386

 

 

$

64,852

 

 

$

386

 

Interest rate caps

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

-

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

251

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

12,971

 

 

 

1,845

 

 

 

13,222

 

 

 

1,888

 

Total

 

$

251

 

 

$

43

 

 

$

77,873

 

 

$

2,231

 

 

$

78,124

 

 

$

2,274

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty netting and collateral posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,184

)

Carrying value of derivative

   contracts – Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

90

 

As of March 31, 2015, we held collateral of $145 million which offset derivative assets, and posted collateral of $1,694 million which offset derivative liabilities.  We also held excess collateral of $10 million which we did not use to offset derivative assets, and we posted excess collateral of $2 million which we did not use to offset derivative liabilities.

111


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 7 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)

The following table summarizes the components of interest expense, including the location and amount of gains and losses on derivative instruments and related hedged items, as reported in our Consolidated Statement of Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Interest expense on debt

 

$

1,308

 

 

$

1,213

 

 

$

1,262

 

Interest income on hedge accounting derivatives

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(43

)

 

 

(85

)

Interest income on non-hedge accounting foreign currency

   swaps

 

 

(94

)

 

 

(147

)

 

 

(202

)

Interest expense on non-hedge accounting interest rate swaps

 

 

103

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

210

 

Interest expense on debt and derivatives,  net

 

 

1,301

 

 

 

1,146

 

 

 

1,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss on hedge accounting derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

20

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

8

 

Loss on hedge accounting derivatives

 

 

-

 

 

 

141

 

 

 

28

 

Less hedged item:  change in fair value of fixed rate debt

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(142

)

 

 

(31

)

Ineffectiveness related to hedge accounting derivatives

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss (gain) from foreign currency transactions

   and non-hedge accounting derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss (gain) on non-hedge accounting foreign currency

   transactions

 

 

503

 

 

 

(2,375

)

 

 

(45

)

(Gain) loss on non-hedge accounting foreign currency swaps

 

 

(573

)

 

 

2,248

 

 

 

185

 

(Gain) loss on non-hedge accounting interest rate

   swaps

 

 

(92

)

 

 

(282

)

 

 

18

 

Total interest expense

 

$

1,137

 

 

$

736

 

 

$

1,340

 

Interest expense on debt and derivatives represents net interest settlements and changes in accruals.  Gains and losses from hedge accounting derivatives and foreign currency transactions exclude net interest settlements and changes in accruals.  Cash flows associated with hedge accounting, non-hedge accounting, and de-designated derivatives are reported in Net cash provided by operating activities in our Statement of Cash Flows.

The relative fair value allocation of derivative credit value adjustments for counterparty and non-performance credit risk within interest expense is not significant for the years ended March 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, as we fully collateralize our derivatives without regard to credit ratings.

112


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 8 – Other Assets and Other Liabilities

Other assets and other liabilities consisted of the following:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes receivable from affiliates

 

$

1,177

 

 

$

1,184

 

Used vehicles held for sale

 

 

319

 

 

 

188

 

Deferred charges

 

 

131

 

 

 

122

 

Income taxes receivable

 

 

31

 

 

 

174

 

Derivative assets

 

 

68

 

 

 

53

 

Other assets

 

 

622

 

 

 

561

 

Total other assets

 

$

2,348

 

 

$

2,282

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unearned insurance premiums and contract revenues

 

$

1,985

 

 

$

1,825

 

Derivative liabilities

 

 

7

 

 

 

90

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

939

 

 

 

855

 

Deferred income

 

 

462

 

 

 

405

 

Other liabilities

 

 

192

 

 

 

180

 

Total other liabilities

 

$

3,585

 

 

$

3,355

 


113


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 9 – Debt

Debt and the related weighted average contractual interest rates are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

contractual interest rates

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Commercial paper

 

$

26,608

 

 

$

27,006

 

 

 

0.60

%

 

 

0.21

%

Unsecured notes and loans payable

 

 

52,856

 

 

 

52,307

 

 

 

1.76

%

 

 

1.86

%

Secured notes and loans payable

 

 

14,139

 

 

 

10,837

 

 

 

0.91

%

 

 

0.60

%

Carrying value adjustment

 

 

122

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

$

93,725

 

 

$

90,231

 

 

 

1.30

%

 

 

1.22

%

The commercial paper balance includes unamortized premiums and discounts.  As of March 31, 2016 our commercial paper had a weighted average remaining maturity of 83 days, while our notes and loans payable mature on various dates through fiscal 2047.  Weighted average contractual interest rates are calculated based on original notional or par value before consideration of premium or discount.

The carrying value of our unsecured notes and loans payable at March 31, 2016 included $17.9 billion of unsecured floating rate debt with contractual interest rates ranging from 0 percent to 3.1 percent and $35.1 billion of unsecured fixed rate debt with contractual interest rates ranging from 0.8 percent to 9.4 percent.  The carrying value of our unsecured notes and loans payable at March 31, 2015 included $17.4 billion of unsecured floating rate debt with contractual interest rates ranging from 0 percent to 3.3 percent and $35.0 billion of unsecured fixed rate debt with contractual interest rates ranging from 0.8 percent to 9.4 percent.  Upon issuance of fixed rate notes, we generally elect to enter into interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate payments on notes to floating rate payments.

Our unsecured notes and loans payable contain covenants and conditions customary in transactions of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions and limitations on certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets.  We are currently in compliance with these covenants and conditions.

Included in unsecured notes and loans payable are notes and loans denominated in various foreign currencies, unamortized premiums and discounts and the effects of foreign currency transaction gains and losses on non-hedged or de-designated foreign currency denominated notes and loans payable.  At March 31, 2016 and 2015, the carrying values of these foreign currency denominated notes payable were $13.1 billion and $12.4 billion, respectively.  Concurrent with the issuance of these foreign currency unsecured notes, we entered into currency swaps in the same notional amount to convert non-U.S. currency payments to U.S. dollar denominated payments.

Our secured notes and loans payable are denominated in U.S. dollars and consist of both fixed and variable rate debt with interest rates ranging from 0.5 percent to 1.7 percent at March 31, 2016 and 0.4 percent to 1.5 percent at March 31, 2015.  Secured notes and loans are issued by on-balance sheet securitization trusts, as further discussed in Note 10 – Variable Interest Entities.  These notes are repayable only from collections on the underlying securitized retail finance receivables and the beneficial interests in investments in operating leases and from related credit enhancements.

The carrying value adjustment on debt represents the effects of fair value adjustments to debt in hedging relationships, accrued redemption premiums, and the unamortized fair value adjustments on the hedged item for terminated fair value hedge accounting relationships.  The carrying value adjustment on debt increased by $41 million at March 31, 2016 compared to March 31, 2015 primarily as a result of a weaker U.S. dollar relative to certain other currencies in which our hedged debt is denominated.


114


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 9 – Debt (Continued)

Scheduled maturities of our debt portfolio are summarized below.  Actual repayment of secured debt will vary based on the repayment activity on the related pledged assets.

 

 

Future

 

Years ending March 31,

 

debt maturities

 

2017

 

$

47,521

 

2018

 

 

16,164

 

2019

 

 

9,745

 

2020

 

 

5,163

 

2021

 

 

6,608

 

Thereafter

 

 

8,524

 

Total debt

 

$

93,725

 

115


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 10 – Variable Interest Entities

Consolidated Variable Interest Entities

We use one or more special purpose entities that are considered Variable Interest EntitiesVIEs to issue asset-backed securities to third partythird-party bank-sponsored asset-backed securitization vehicles and to investors in securitization transactions. The securities issued by these VIEs are backed by the cash flows related to retail finance receivables and beneficial interests in investments in operating leases (“Securitized Assets”). We hold variable interests in the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. We determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the securitization trusts because (i) our servicing responsibilities for the Securitized Assets give us the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the performance of the VIEs, and (ii) our variable interests in the VIEs give us the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive residual returns that could potentially be significant.

The following tables show the assets and liabilities related to our VIE securitization transactions that were included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

VIE Assets

 

 

VIE Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted
cash

 

 

securitized
assets

 

 

Other
assets

 

 

Debt

 

 

Other
liabilities

 

Retail finance receivables

 

$

1,434

 

 

$

28,764

 

 

$

85

 

 

$

25,155

 

 

$

41

 

Investments in operating leases

 

 

656

 

 

 

11,063

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

7,581

 

 

 

10

 

Total

 

$

2,090

 

 

$

39,827

 

 

$

108

 

 

$

32,736

 

 

$

51

 

 

 

March 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

VIE Assets

 

 

VIE Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted
cash

 

 

securitized
assets

 

 

Other
assets

 

 

Debt

 

 

Other
liabilities

 

Retail finance receivables

 

$

1,284

 

 

$

20,932

 

 

$

51

 

 

$

18,562

 

 

$

8

 

Investments in operating leases

 

 

645

 

 

 

11,886

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

8,302

 

 

 

2

 

Total

 

$

1,929

 

 

$

32,818

 

 

$

66

 

 

$

26,864

 

 

$

10

 

90


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in our financial statements:millions)

Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities (Continued)

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VIE Assets

 

 

VIE Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted

Cash

 

 

Securitized

Assets

 

 

Securitized

Assets

 

 

Other

Assets

 

 

Debt

 

 

Other

Liabilities

 

Retail finance receivables

 

$

853

 

 

$

14,343

 

 

$

14,130

 

 

$

6

 

 

$

12,449

 

 

$

4

 

Investments in operating leases

 

 

136

 

 

 

3,364

 

 

 

2,504

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

1,690

 

 

 

1

 

Total

 

$

989

 

 

$

17,707

 

 

$

16,634

 

 

$

84

 

 

$

14,139

 

 

$

5

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VIE Assets

 

 

VIE Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted

Cash

 

 

Securitized

Assets

 

 

Securitized

Assets

 

 

Other

Assets

 

 

Debt

 

 

Other

Liabilities

 

Retail finance receivables

 

$

730

 

 

$

11,682

 

 

$

11,509

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

9,980

 

 

$

3

 

Investments in operating leases

 

 

54

 

 

 

1,571

 

 

 

1,193

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

857

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

784

 

 

$

13,253

 

 

$

12,702

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

10,837

 

 

$

3

 

Restricted Cashcash, including restricted cash equivalents, shown in the table above representsprevious tables represent collections from the underlying Securitized AssetsNet securitized assets and certain reserve deposits held by TMCC for the VIEs and is included as part of Restricted cash and cash equivalents on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  Gross Securitized Assets represent finance receivables and beneficial interestsSheets. Net securitized assets shown in investments in operating leases securitized for the asset-backed securities issued.  Net Securitized Assetsprevious tables are presented net of deferred fees and costs, deferred income, accumulated depreciation, and the allowance for credit losses. Other Assetsassets represent accrued interests related to securitized retail finance receivables and used vehicles held-for-sale that were repossessed by or returned to TMCC for the benefit of the VIEs. The related debt of these consolidated VIEs is presented net of $1,264 million$1.5 billion and $1,275 million$1.7 billion of securities retained by TMCC at March 31, 20162023 and 2015,2022, respectively. Other Liabilities representsliabilities represent accrued interest on the debt of the consolidated VIEs.

The assets of the VIEs and the restrictedRestricted cash and cash equivalents held by TMCC serve as the sole source of repayment for the asset-backed securities issued by these entities. Investors in the notes issued by the VIEs do not have recourse to us or our other assets, with the exception of customary representation and warranty repurchase provisions and indemnities.

As the primary beneficiary of these entities, we are exposed to credit, residual value, interest rate, and prepayment risk from the Securitized Assets in the VIEs. However, our exposure to these risks did not change as a result of the transfer of the assets to the VIEs. We may also be exposed to interest rate risk arising from the secured notes issued by the VIEs.

In addition, we entered into interest rate swaps with certain special purpose entities that issue variable rate debt. Under the terms of these swaps, the special purpose entities are obligated to pay TMCC a fixed rate of interest on certain payment dates in exchange for receiving a floating rate of interest on notional amounts equal to the outstanding balance of the secured debt. This arrangement enables the special purpose entities to mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in issuing variable rate debt that is secured by fixed rate Securitized Assets.

116


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 10 – Variable Interest Entities (Continued)

The transfers of the Securitized Assets to the special purpose entities in our securitizations are considered to be sales for legal purposes. However, the Securitized Assets and the related debt remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. We recognize financing revenue on the Securitized Assets and interest expense on the secured debt issued by the special purpose entities. We also maintain an allowance for credit losses on the Securitized Assets to cover estimated probable credit lossessecuritized retail finance receivables using a methodology consistent with that used for our non-securitized asset portfolio. The interest rate swaps between TMCC and the special purpose entities are considered intercompany transactions and therefore are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements.

Non-consolidated Variable Interest Entities

We provide lending to Toyota and Lexus dealers through the Toyota Dealer Investment Group’s Dealer Capital Program (“TDIG Program”) operated by our affiliate TMS,TMNA, which has an equity interest in these dealerships. Dealers participating in this program have been determined to be VIEs. We do not consolidate the dealerships in this program as we are not the primary beneficiary and anybeneficiary. Any exposure to loss is limited to the amount of the credit facility. At March 31, 2016 and 2015, amountsAmounts due from these dealers under the TDIG Program that are classified as Finance receivables, net in theon our Consolidated Balance SheetSheets at March 31, 2023 and 2022, and revenues receivedearned from these dealers during fiscal 2016, 20152023, 2022, and 20142021 were not significant.

We also have other lending relationships which have been determined to be VIEs, but these relationships are not consolidated as we are not the primary beneficiary.  Amounts due under these relationships as

91


Table of March 31, 2016 and 2015 were not significant.

Contents

117


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 11 – Liquidity Facilities and Letters of Credit

For additional liquidity purposes, we maintain syndicated bank credit facilities with certain banks.

364 Day Credit Agreement, Three Year Credit Agreement and Five Year Credit Agreement

In November 2015, TMCC, Toyota Credit de Puerto Rico Corp. (“TCPR”) and other Toyota affiliates entered into a $5.0 billion 364 day syndicated bank credit facility, a $5.0 billion three year syndicated bank credit facility and a $5.0 billion five year syndicated bank credit facility, expiring in fiscal 2017, 2019, and 2021, respectively.

The ability to make draws is subject to covenants and conditions customary in transactions of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions and limitations on certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets.  These agreements may be used for general corporate purposes and none were drawn upon as of March 31, 2016.  We are currently in compliance with the covenants and conditions of the credit agreements described above.

Other Unsecured Credit Agreements

TMCC has entered into additional unsecured credit facilities with various banks.  As of March 31, 2016, TMCC had committed bank credit facilities totaling $5.3 billion, of which $2.7 billion, $125 million, $2.1 billion, and $375 million mature in fiscal 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively.

These credit agreements contain covenants and conditions customary in transactions of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions and limitations on certain consolidations, mergers and sales of assets.  These credit facilities were not drawn upon as of March 31, 2016 and 2015. We are currently in compliance with the covenants and conditions of the credit agreements described above.

118


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 12 – Pension and Other Benefit Plans

We are a participating employer in certain retirement and post-employment health care, life insurance, and other benefits sponsored by TMS, an affiliate.  Costs of each plan are generally allocated to us by TMS based on relative payroll costs associated with participating or eligible employees at TMCC as compared to the plan as a whole.

Defined Benefit Plan

Prior to January 1, 2015, our employees were generally eligible to participate in the Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Pension Plans sponsored by TMS commencing on the first day of the month following hire and were vested after 5 years of continuous employment.  Effective January 1, 2015, TMS-sponsored benefit pension plans were closed to employees first employed or reemployed on or after such date.

Benefits payable under this non-contributory defined benefit pension plan are based, generally, upon the employees' years of credited service (up to a maximum of 25 years), the highest average annual compensation (as defined in the plan) for any 60 consecutive month period out of the last 120 months of employment (the “Applicable Years”), and one-half of eligible bonus/gift payments for the Applicable Years (recalculated to determine the annual average of such amount), reduced by a percentage of the estimated amount of social security benefits.

Pension costs allocated to TMCC for our employees in the TMS pension plan were $11 million, $4 million and $15 million for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Defined Contribution Plan

Employees meeting certain eligibility requirements, as defined in the plan documents, may participate in the Toyota Motor Sales Savings Plan sponsored by TMS.  Under these plans, eligible employees may elect to contribute between 1 percent and 30 percent of their eligible pre-tax compensation, subject to federal tax regulation limits.  We match 66 2/3 cents for each dollar the participant contributes, up to 6 percent of base pay.  Participants are vested 25 percent each year with respect to our contributions and are fully vested after four years. The contributions are funded bi-weekly by payments to the plans’ administrator.  Certain employees hired on or after January 1, 2015, may be eligible to receive an annually funded Company contribution to the plans calculated based on their age and compensation.

TMCC employer contributions to the TMS savings plan were $8 million, $7 million and $7 million for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

Employees are generally eligible to participate in other post-retirement benefits sponsored by TMS which provide certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retired employees.  In order to be eligible for these benefits, the employee must retire with at least ten years of service and in some cases be at least 55 years of age.

Other post-retirement benefit costs allocated to TMCC were $13 million, $13 million and $16 million for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

119


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 13 – Income Tax Provision

The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

73

 

 

$

(25

)

 

$

(24

)

State

 

 

(33

)

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(3

)

Foreign

 

 

9

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

8

 

Total

 

 

49

 

 

 

(31

)

 

 

(19

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

420

 

 

 

644

 

 

 

460

 

State

 

 

111

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

54

 

Foreign

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

2

 

Total

 

 

531

 

 

 

760

 

 

 

516

 

Provision for income taxes

 

$

580

 

 

$

729

 

 

$

497

 

A reconciliation between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate is as follows:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Provision for income taxes at U.S. federal statutory tax rate

 

 

35.0

%

 

 

35.0

%

 

 

35.0

%

State and local taxes (net of federal tax benefit)

 

 

3.2

%

 

 

3.2

%

 

 

3.1

%

Other, net

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

(0.3

)%

 

 

(1.4

)%

Effective tax rate

 

 

38.4

%

 

 

37.9

%

 

 

36.7

%

The amounts in Other, net in the table above include benefits from fuel cell credits for fiscal 2016 and federal plug-in and electric vehicle credits for fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014, offset by adjustments for the differences between the income tax accrued in the prior year as compared with the actual liability on the income tax returns as filed.  

120


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 13 – Income Tax Provision (Continued)

Our net deferred income tax liability consisted of the following deferred tax liabilities and assets:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease transactions

 

$

8,579

 

 

$

8,576

 

State taxes

 

 

642

 

 

 

570

 

Mark-to-market of investments in marketable securities and derivatives

 

 

316

 

 

 

292

 

Other

 

 

344

 

 

 

329

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

$

9,881

 

 

$

9,767

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for credit and residual value losses

 

 

431

 

 

 

328

 

Deferred costs and fees

 

 

292

 

 

 

258

 

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

 

 

1,097

 

 

 

1,615

 

Other

 

 

67

 

 

 

67

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

1,887

 

 

 

2,268

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(22

)

 

 

(20

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

1,865

 

 

$

2,248

 

Net deferred income tax liability1

 

$

8,016

 

 

$

7,519

 

1  Balance includes deferred tax liabilities attributable to unrealized gain or loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of $102 million and $136 million at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The change in this deferred liability is not included in total deferred tax expense.

We have deferred tax assets related to our cumulative federal net operating loss carryforwards of $912 million and $1,435 million available at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  The federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire beginning in fiscal 2029 through fiscal 2035.  At March 31, 2016, we have a deferred tax asset of $67 million for state tax net operating loss carryforwards which will expire in fiscal 2017 through fiscal 2036.  At March 31, 2015, we had deferred tax assets of $71 million for state tax net operating loss carryforwards which will expire in fiscal 2016 through fiscal 2035.

At March 31, 2016 and 2015, we have deferred tax assets for federal and state alternative fuel vehicle credits of $99 million and $96 million, respectively.  The deferred tax assets related to state tax net operating losses and state alternative minimum tax credits are reduced by a valuation allowance of $22 million at March 31, 2016.  The deferred tax assets related to state tax net operating losses and charitable contributions were reduced by a valuation allowance of $20 million at March 31, 2015.  The determination of the valuation allowance is based on Management’s estimate of future taxable income during the respective carryforward periods.  Apart from the valuation allowance, we believe that the remaining deferred tax assets will be realized in full.  We received a net tax refund of $95 million for fiscal 2016 and made net tax payments of $143 million in fiscal 2015.      

On December 18, 2015, the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (the “Act”) was enacted which extended bonus depreciation and certain tax credits.  The impact of this Act is reflected in our federal tax loss and tax credit carryforwards.  Realization with respect to the federal tax loss and tax credit carryforwards is dependent on generating sufficient income prior to expiration of the loss carryforwards.  Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized.  The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable could be reduced if management’s estimates change.

On October 1, 2015, TMCC sold its commercial finance business to TICF. Pursuant to the sale agreement with TICF, TMCC recognized a taxable gain that resulted in current federal and state income tax expense of $89 million.


121


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 13 – Income Tax Provision (Continued)

We have made an assertion of permanent reinvestment of earnings from our foreign subsidiary; as a result, U.S. taxes have not been provided for unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiary.  At March 31, 2016 and 2015, these unremitted earnings totaled $208 million and $196 million, respectively.  Determination of the amount of the deferred tax liability is not practicable, and accordingly no estimate of the unrecorded deferred tax liability is provided.  

Although there are no foreseeable events causing repatriation of earnings, possible examples may include but are not limited to parent company capital needs or exiting the business in the foreign country.

At March 31, 2016, we had an income tax payable of $11 million and at March 31, 2015, we had an income tax receivable of $13 million, for our share of the income tax in those states where we filed consolidated or combined returns with TMNA and its subsidiaries.  At March 31, 2016, we had an income tax payable of $2 million, and at March 31, 2015, we had an income tax receivable of $5 million, for federal and state income tax from TMCC affiliated companies.  Such TMCC affiliated companies include TFSA, Toyota Financial Savings Bank (“TFSB”), and Toyota Financial Services Securities USA Corporation.

The guidance for the accounting and reporting for income taxes requires us to assess tax positions in cases where the interpretation of the tax law may be uncertain.

The change in unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Balance at beginning of the year

 

$

-

 

 

$

6

 

 

$

7

 

Increases related to positions taken during the

   current year

 

 

1

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Decreases related to positions taken during the prior years

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1

)

Settlements

 

 

-

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

-

 

Balance at end of year

 

$

1

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

6

 

At March 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 approximately $1 million of the respective unrecognized tax benefits would, if recognized, have an effect on the effective tax rate.  There are no amounts remaining in the respective unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 that are related to timing matters.  During fiscal 2016, $1 million of the increase in unrecognized tax benefits had an effect on the effective tax rate. We do not have any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within 12 months.

We accrue interest, if applicable, related to uncertain income tax positions in interest expense.  Statutory penalties, if applicable, accrued with respect to uncertain income tax positions are recognized as an addition to the income tax liability.  For each of fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014, less than $1 million was accrued for interest and no penalties were accrued.

Tax-related Contingencies

As of March 31, 2016, we remain under IRS examination for fiscal 2016 and 2015. The IRS examination for fiscal 2014 was concluded in the second quarter of fiscal 2016.

122


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 149 – Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Guarantees

We have entered into certain commitments and guarantees for which the maximum unfunded amounts are summarized in the table below:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Commitments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit facilities commitments with dealers

 

$

1,168

 

 

$

1,137

 

Minimum lease commitments

 

 

55

 

 

 

60

 

Total commitments

 

 

1,223

 

 

 

1,197

 

Guarantees of affiliate pollution control and solid waste disposal bonds

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

Total commitments and guarantees

 

$

1,323

 

 

$

1,297

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Commitments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit facilities commitments with dealers

 

$

3,153

 

 

$

3,289

 

Commitments under operating lease agreements

 

 

106

 

 

 

119

 

Total commitments

 

 

3,259

 

 

 

3,408

 

Guarantees of affiliate pollution control and solid waste disposal bonds

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

Total commitments and guarantees

 

$

3,359

 

 

$

3,508

 

Wholesale financing is not considered to be a contractual commitment as the arrangements are not binding arrangements under which TMCC is required to perform.

We are party to a 15-year lease agreement, which expires in 2018, with TMS for our headquarters location in the TMS headquarters complex in Torrance, California.  Total rental expense, including payments to affiliates, was $25 million, $26 million, and $25 million for fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.  Minimum lease commitments in the table above include $16 million and $23 million for facilities leases with affiliates at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  At March 31, 2016, minimum future commitments under lease agreements to which we are a lessee, including those under the TMS lease, are as follows:Commitments

 

 

Future minimum

 

Years ending March 31,

 

lease payments

 

2017

 

$

22

 

2018

 

 

17

 

2019

 

 

9

 

2020

 

 

4

 

2021

 

 

2

 

Thereafter

 

 

1

 

Total

 

$

55

 

Commitments

We provide fixed and variable rate working capital loans, revolving lines of credit, and real estate financing to dealers and various multi-franchise organizations referred to as dealer groups for facilities construction and refurbishment, working capital requirements, real estate purchases, business acquisitions and other general business purposes. These loans are typically secured with liens on real estate, vehicle inventory, and/or other dealership assets, as appropriate, and may be guaranteed by individual or corporate guarantees of affiliated dealers, dealer groups, or dealer principals. Although the loans are typically collateralized or guaranteed, the value of the underlying collateral or guarantees may not be sufficient to cover our exposure under such agreements. Our pricing reflects market conditions, the competitive environment, the level of support dealers provide for our retail, lease and insurancevoluntary protection business and the credit worthinesscreditworthiness of each dealer. Amounts drawn under these facilities are reviewed for collectability on a quarterly basis, in conjunction with our evaluation of the allowance for credit losses. In addition to the total commitments and guarantees in the previous table, we have also extended credit facilities to affiliates as described in Note 12 – Related Party Transactions.

On April 28, 2014,Lease Commitments

Our operating lease portfolio consists of real estate leases. Total operating lease expense, including payments to affiliates, was $32 million for fiscal 2023, $32 million for fiscal 2022, and $36 million for fiscal 2021. We have a lease agreement through August 2032 with TMNA for our headquarters facility in Plano, Texas. Commitments under operating lease agreements in the Company announced that our corporate headquarters will move from Torrance, California to Plano, Texas beginning in 2017 as part of TMC’s planned consolidation of its three North American headquarters for manufacturing, sales and marketing to a single new headquarters facility.   To date, the Company has not incurred significant costs related to employee relocation, lease termination or other related relocation expenses as a result of this planned headquarters move.  These moving costs are currently estimated to be approximately $120previous table include $76 million and $84 million for facilities leases with affiliates at March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Lease terms may contain renewal and extension options or early termination features. Generally, these options do not impact the lease term because TMCC is not reasonably certain that it will be expensed as incurred overexercise the next several years.  The moving costs incurredoptions. These lease agreements do not impose restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, engage in fiscal 2016 weredebt or equity financing transactions or enter into further lease agreements, nor do they have residual value guarantees. We exclude from our Consolidated Balance Sheets leases with a term equal to one year or less and do not significant.separate non-lease components from our real estate leases.

12392


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 149 – Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Our commitments under operating lease agreements are summarized below:

 

 

March 31,

 

Years ending March 31,

 

2023

 

2024

 

$

18

 

2025

 

 

15

 

2026

 

 

14

 

2027

 

 

13

 

2028

 

 

13

 

Thereafter

 

 

33

 

Total

 

$

106

 

Present value discount

 

 

(11

)

Total operating lease liability

 

$

95

 

Operating lease liabilities and right-of-use (“ROU”) assets are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. As the interest rate implicit in the lease contract is typically not readily determinable, we utilize our incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date for the duration of the lease term.

The following table provides additional information related to operating lease agreements for which we are the lessee:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

ROU assets

 

$

83

 

Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)

 

 

7.6

 

Weighted average discount rate

 

 

2.86

%

Guarantees and Other Contingencies

TMCC has guaranteed bond obligations totaling $100$100 million in principal that were issued by Putnam County, West Virginia and Gibson County, Indiana to finance the construction of pollution control facilities at manufacturing plants of certain TMCC affiliates. The bonds mature in the following fiscal years ending March 31: 2028 - $202028- $20 million; 2029 - $50$50 million; 2030 - $10$10 million; 2031 - $10$10 million; and 2032 - $10$10 million. TMCC would be required to perform under the guarantees in the event of non-payment on the bonds and other related obligations. TMCC is entitled to reimbursement by the applicable affiliates for any amounts paid. TMCC receives ana nominal annual fee of $78 thousand for guaranteeing such payments. TMCC has not been required to perform under any of these affiliate bond guarantees as of March 31, 20162023 and 2015.2022.

Indemnification

93


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Indemnification

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into agreements containing indemnification provisions standard in the industry related to several types of transactions, including, but not limited to, debt funding, derivatives, securitization transactions, and our vendor, supplier and supplierservice agreements. Performance under these indemnities would generally occur upon a breach of the representations, warranties, covenants or covenantsother commitments made or given in the agreement, or as a third partyresult of a third-party claim. In addition, we have agreed in certain debt and derivative issuances, and subject to certain exceptions, to gross-up payments due to third parties in the event that withholding tax is imposed on such payments. In addition, certain of our funding arrangements may require us to pay lenders for increased costs due to certain changes in laws or regulations. Due to the difficulty in predicting events which could cause a breach of the indemnification provisions or trigger a gross-up or other payment obligation, we are not able to estimate our maximum exposure to future payments that could result from claims made under such provisions. We have not made any material payments in the past as a result of these provisions, and as of March 31, 2016,2023, we determined that it is not probable that we will be required to make any material payments in the future. As of March 31, 20162023 and 2015, 2022, no amounts have been recorded under these indemnification provisions.

Litigation and Governmental Proceedings

Various legal actions, governmental proceedings and other claims are pending or may be instituted or asserted in the future against us with respect to matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Certain of these actions are or purport to be class action suits, seeking sizeable damages and/or changes in our business operations, policies and practices. Certain of these actions are similar to suits that have been filed against other financial institutions and captive finance companies. In addition, we are subject to governmental and regulatory examinations, information-gathering requests, and investigations from time to time at the state and federal levels. It is inherently difficult to predict the course of such legal actions and governmental inquiries.

We perform periodic reviews of pending claims and actions to determine the probability of adverse verdicts and resulting amounts of liability. We establish accruals for legal claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. When we are able, we also determine estimates of reasonably possiblereasonable possibility of loss or range of loss, whether in excess of any related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability. Given the inherent uncertainty associated with legal matters, the actual costs of resolving legal claims and associated costs of defense may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts for which accruals have been established. Based on available information and established accruals, we do not believe it is reasonably possibleprobable that the results of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

We have received a request for documents and information fromOn November 24, 2020, the New York State Department ofConsumer Financial Services relating to our lending practices (including fair lending), and a request for documents and information pursuant toProtection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a civil investigative demand fromto the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of the Attorney GeneralCompany seeking, among other things, certain information relating to our financing of guaranteed autothe Company’s vehicle and payment protection insurance products on retail contracts.and credit reporting policies and procedures and reporting records. We are cooperating with these requests, butthe inquiry and cannot predict the eventual scope, duration or outcome at this time. As a result, we are unable to predict their outcome given their preliminary status.estimate the amount or range of any potential loss arising from this investigation.

12494


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 10 – Pension and Other Benefit Plans

We are a participating employer in certain retirement and post-retirement medical care, life insurance, and other benefits sponsored by TMNA, an affiliate. Costs of each plan are generally allocated to TMCC based on relative benefit costs associated with participating or eligible employees at TMCC as compared to the plan as a whole.

Defined Benefit Plan

Prior to January 1, 2015, our employees were generally eligible to participate in the Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”) commencing on the first day of the month following hire and were vested after 5 years of continuous employment. Effective January 1, 2015, the Pension Plan was closed to employees first employed or reemployed on or after such date.

Benefits payable under this non-contributory defined benefit pension plan are based, generally, upon the employees' years of credited service (up to a maximum of 25 years), the highest average annual compensation (as defined in the plan) for any 60 consecutive month period out of the last 120 months of employment (the “Applicable Years”), and one-half of eligible bonus/gift payments for the Applicable Years (recalculated to determine the annual average of such amount), reduced by a percentage of the estimated amount of social security benefits.

Costs allocated to TMCC for our employees in the Pension Plan and certain other non-qualified plans were not significant for fiscal 2023, 2022, and 2021.

Defined Contribution Plan

Employees meeting certain eligibility requirements, as defined in the plan documents, may participate in the Toyota Motor North America, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan. Under this plan, eligible employees may elect to contribute between 1 percent and 30 percent of their eligible pre-tax compensation, subject to federal tax regulation limits. We match 66.67 percent of the first 6 percent that a participant contributes, up to 4 percent of eligible compensation. Participants are always 100% vested in their contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan. Employer contributions vest on a 4-year graded schedule at 25 percent per year. Generally, contributions are funded through bi-weekly payments to the plan’s administrator. Certain employees hired on or after January 1, 2015, may be eligible to receive an additional Company contribution to the plan calculated based on their age and compensation.

TMCC employer contributions to the savings plan were not significant for fiscal 2023, 2022, and 2021.

Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

Employees are generally eligible to participate in other post-retirement benefits sponsored by TMNA which provide certain medical care and life insurance benefits to eligible retired employees. Generally, in order to be eligible for these benefits, the employee must be age 55 or older with 10 or more years of service.

Other post-retirement benefit costs allocated to TMCC were not significant for fiscal 2023, 2022, and 2021.

95


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 11 – Income Taxes

We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in tax rates and laws in the period such changes are enacted resulting in adjustments to the current fiscal year’s provision for income taxes.

TMCC files a consolidated federal income tax return with TFSIC and its subsidiaries. Current and deferred federal income taxes are allocated to TMCC as if it were a separate taxpayer. TMCC’s net operating losses and tax credits are utilized when those losses and credits are used by TFSIC and its subsidiaries including TMCC in the consolidated federal income tax return. TMCC files either separate or consolidated/combined state income tax returns with TMNA, TFSIC, or subsidiaries of TMCC. State income tax expense is generally recognized as if TMCC and its subsidiaries filed their tax returns on a stand-alone basis. In those states where TMCC and its subsidiaries join in the filing of consolidated or combined income tax returns, TMCC and its subsidiaries are allocated their share of the total income tax expense based on combined allocation/apportionment factors and separate company income or loss. Based on the federal and state tax sharing agreements, TFSIC and TMCC and its subsidiaries pay for their share of the income tax expense and are reimbursed for the benefit of any of their tax losses and credits utilized in the federal and state income tax returns.

The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

(1,859

)

 

$

1,774

 

 

$

2,756

 

State

 

 

(1

)

 

 

281

 

 

 

386

 

Foreign

 

 

16

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

11

 

Total

 

 

(1,844

)

 

 

2,077

 

 

 

3,153

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

2,100

 

 

 

(1,166

)

 

 

(2,243

)

State

 

 

78

 

 

 

(123

)

 

 

(276

)

Foreign

 

 

(5

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

(2

)

Total

 

 

2,173

 

 

 

(1,288

)

 

 

(2,521

)

Provision for income taxes

 

$

329

 

 

$

789

 

 

$

632

 

A reconciliation between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate is as follows:

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

2023

 

2022

 

2021

Provision for income taxes at U.S. federal statutory tax rate

 

21.0%

 

21.0%

 

21.0%

State and local taxes (net of federal tax benefit)

 

4.2%

 

3.7%

 

3.9%

Changes in unrecognized tax benefits

 

1.3%

 

-

 

-

Federal tax credits 1

 

(1.0)%

 

(1.0)%

 

(0.5)%

Other, net

 

(0.3)%

 

-

 

(0.5)%

Effective tax rate

 

25.2%

 

23.7%

 

23.9%

1.
The amounts in Federal tax credits include tax benefits from foreign tax credits, plug-in vehicle credits, and research and development credits for fiscal 2023, 2022, and 2021. The amounts in Federal tax credits also include credits for qualified commercial clean vehicles for fiscal 2023 and alternative fuel vehicle credits for fiscal 2022 and 2021.

96


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 11 – Income Taxes (Continued)

Our net deferred income tax liability consisted of the following deferred tax liabilities and assets:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease transactions

 

$

4,786

 

 

$

1,504

 

Voluntary protection dealer commissions

 

 

403

 

 

 

348

 

State taxes, net of federal tax benefit

 

 

356

 

 

 

275

 

Mark-to-market of investments in marketable securities and derivatives

 

 

-

 

 

 

24

 

Other

 

 

72

 

 

 

82

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

$

5,617

 

 

$

2,233

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

 

 

1,007

 

 

 

14

 

Provision for credit and residual value losses

 

 

478

 

 

 

394

 

Deferred costs and fees

 

 

197

 

 

 

179

 

Mark-to-market of investments in marketable securities and derivatives

 

 

150

 

 

 

-

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

23

 

 

 

45

 

Lease obligations

 

 

20

 

 

 

23

 

Other

 

 

17

 

 

 

14

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

1,892

 

 

 

669

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(2

)

 

 

-

 

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

1,890

 

 

$

669

 

Net deferred income tax liability 1

 

$

3,727

 

 

$

1,564

 

1.
Balance includes deferred tax assets of $16 million and $6 million at March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, attributable to unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The change in this balance is not included in the total deferred tax expense.

We have deferred tax assets related to cumulative federal net operating loss carry forwards of $955 million at March 31, 2023 and none at March 31, 2022, respectively. We have deferred tax assets related to cumulative state net operating loss carry forwards of $37 million and $13 million at March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. State net operating loss carryforwards will expire beginning in fiscal 2024.

We have deferred tax assets related to federal tax credits for plug-in vehicles and qualified commercial clean vehicles of $11 million and federal tax credit for research and development of $4 million at March 31, 2023. We had no deferred tax assets related to federal tax credits for vehicles or research and development at March 31, 2022. The deferred tax assets related to federal tax credit for foreign tax were not significant as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The federal tax credit carryforwards will expire beginning in fiscal 2032.

The valuation allowance on deferred tax assets was not significant as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The determination of the valuation allowance is based on management’s estimate of future taxable income during the respective carryforward periods. Apart from the valuation allowance, we believe that the remaining deferred tax assets will be realized in full. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable could be reduced if management’s estimates change.

97


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 11 – Income Taxes (Continued)

We have made an assertion of permanent reinvestment of earnings from our foreign subsidiary; as a result, other than the deemed repatriation tax that is provided pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, state and local taxes have not been provided for unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiary. At March 31, 2023 and 2022, these unremitted earnings totaled $307 million and $288 million, respectively. Determination of the amount of the deferred state and local tax liability is not practicable, and accordingly no estimate of the unrecorded deferred state and local tax liability is provided.

Although we do not foresee any events causing repatriation of earnings, possible examples may include but are not limited to parent company capital needs or exiting the business in the foreign country.

We had an income tax receivable of $28 million and an income tax payable of $52 million for our share of the income tax in those states where we filed consolidated or combined returns with TMNA and its subsidiaries at March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Additionally, our federal and state income tax payable or receivable from TMCC affiliated companies, including TFSIC, TFSB, and Toyota Financial Services Securities USA Corporation, was not significant for both March 31, 2023 and 2022.

The guidance for the accounting and reporting for income taxes requires us to assess tax positions in cases where the interpretation of the tax law may be uncertain. The change in unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Balance at beginning of the year

 

$

22

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

19

 

Increases related to positions taken during the current year

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Increases recorded in current year related to positions taken
    during prior years

 

 

19

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

2

 

Expirations due to lapse of statute

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(7

)

Balance at end of year

 

$

43

 

 

$

22

 

 

$

15

 

At March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 approximately $43 million, $22 million and $14 million of the respective unrecognized tax benefits would, if recognized, have an effect on the effective tax rate. The remaining amounts in the respective unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 are related to timing matters. During fiscal 2023, $21 million of the net increase in unrecognized tax benefits had an effect on the effective tax rate. We do not have any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within 12 months.

We accrue interest, if applicable, related to uncertain income tax positions in interest expense. Statutory penalties, if applicable, accrued with respect to uncertain income tax positions are recognized as an addition to the income tax liability. For each of fiscal 2023, 2022, and 2021, accrued interest was not significant and no penalties were accrued.

In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act ("the Act") was signed into law. The Act modifies climate and clean energy corporate tax provisions, including amendments to the federal tax credit for plug-in vehicles available under current tax law. The Act also includes a 15 percent corporate alternative minimum tax based on modified financial statement net income, applying to tax years beginning after December 31, 2022, which we expect to be applicable in fiscal 2024. As additional guidance related to the Act is issued, we will evaluate any impact to our consolidated financial statements. The Act does not have a material impact on our results of operations for fiscal 2023.

Tax-related Contingencies

As of March 31, 2023, we remained under IRS examination for fiscal 2018 through fiscal 2023.

98


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 12 – Related Party Transactions

The tables below summarizeshow the financial statement line items and amounts included in our Consolidated StatementStatements of Income and inon our Consolidated Balance SheetSheets under various related party agreements or relationships:relationships:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net financing revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Manufacturers’ subvention support and other revenues

 

$

1,315

 

 

$

1,196

 

 

$

994

 

Origination costs paid to affiliates

 

$

(1

)

 

$

(1

)

 

$

-

 

Credit support fees incurred

 

$

(91

)

 

$

(88

)

 

$

(82

)

Interest and other expenses paid to affiliates

 

$

(3

)

 

$

(2

)

 

$

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance earned premiums and contract revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Affiliate insurance premiums and contract revenues

 

$

132

 

 

$

129

 

 

$

131

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments and other income, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of commercial finance business

 

$

197

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Interest earned on notes receivable from affiliates

 

$

7

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

6

 

Other income from affiliates

 

$

1

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shared services charges and other expenses

 

$

47

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

61

 

Employee benefits expense

 

$

33

 

 

$

24

 

 

$

38

 

Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses

 

$

1

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

-

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Net financing revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Manufacturer's subvention and other revenues

 

$

1,243

 

 

$

1,746

 

 

$

1,997

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

$

106

 

 

$

(75

)

 

$

(113

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit support fees, interest and other expenses

 

$

96

 

 

$

99

 

 

$

117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voluntary protection contract revenues
  and insurance earned premiums:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voluntary protection contract revenues
  and insurance earned premiums

 

$

156

 

 

$

168

 

 

$

173

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment and other income, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income

 

$

35

 

 

$

3

 

 

$

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating and administrative

 

$

107

 

 

$

82

 

 

$

91

 

125

99


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1512 – Related Party Transactions (Continued)

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in marketable securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in affiliates’ commercial paper

 

$

-

 

 

$

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable from affiliates

 

$

119

 

 

$

83

 

Direct finance lease receivables from affiliates

 

$

-

 

 

$

6

 

Notes receivable under home loan programs

 

$

9

 

 

$

11

 

Deferred retail origination costs paid to affiliates

 

$

1

 

 

$

1

 

Deferred retail subvention income from affiliates

 

$

(794

)

 

$

(802

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in operating leases, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leases to affiliates

 

$

2

 

 

$

7

 

Deferred lease origination costs paid to affiliates

 

$

1

 

 

$

1

 

Deferred lease subvention income from affiliates

 

$

(1,057

)

 

$

(950

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes receivable from affiliates

 

$

1,177

 

 

$

1,184

 

Other receivables from affiliates

 

$

7

 

 

$

6

 

Subvention support receivable from affiliates

 

$

127

 

 

$

126

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unearned affiliate insurance premiums and contract revenues

 

$

278

 

 

$

252

 

Accounts payable to affiliates

 

$

209

 

 

$

136

 

Notes payable to affiliates

 

$

20

 

 

$

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder’s Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

$

2

 

 

$

2

 

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial paper

 

$

35

 

 

$

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

$

47

 

 

$

90

 

Deferred retail subvention income

 

$

(922

)

 

$

(875

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in operating leases, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments in operating leases, net

 

$

(250

)

 

$

(212

)

Deferred lease subvention income

 

$

(410

)

 

$

(923

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes receivable

 

$

1,237

 

 

$

789

 

Other receivables, net

 

$

89

 

 

$

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unearned voluntary protection contract revenues
  and insurance earned premiums

 

$

399

 

 

$

374

 

Other payables, net

 

$

432

 

 

$

394

 

Notes payable

 

$

8

 

 

$

8

 

126

TMCC receives subvention payments from TMNA which result in a gross monthly subvention receivable. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, the subvention receivable from TMNA was $79 million and $66 million, respectively. We have a master netting agreement with TMNA which allows us to net settle payments for shared services and subvention transactions. Under this agreement, as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, we had a net amount payable to TMNA which is recorded in Other payables, net in Other liabilities.

Our Board of Directors declared and paid cash dividends of approximately $2.5 billion to TFSIC during fiscal 2023.

100


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1512 – Related Party Transactions (Continued)

Financing Support Arrangements with Affiliates

TMCC is party to a credit support agreement with TFSC (the “TMCC Credit Support Agreement”). The TMCC Credit Support Agreement requires TFSC to maintain certain ownership, net worth maintenance, and debt service provisions inwith respect to TMCC, but is not a guarantee by TFSC of any securities or obligations of TMCC. In conjunction with this credit support agreement, TMCC has agreed to pay TFSC a semi-annual fee based on a fixed rate applied to the weighted average outstanding amount of securities entitled to credit support.  Credit support fees incurred under this agreement were $91 million, $88 million, and $82 million for fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

TCPR is the beneficiary of a credit support agreement with TFSC containing provisions similar to the TMCC Credit Support Agreement described above.

In addition, TMCC receives support from and provides financing support fromto TFSC and other affiliates in the form of promissory notes conduit finance agreements and various loan and credit facility agreements. Total financing support received and provided, along with the amounts currently outstanding under those agreements, is summarized below.  All foreign currency amounts have been translated at the exchange rates in effect asAs of March 31, 2016.2023 and 2022, total financing support available from affiliates totaled approximately $8.4 billion and $8.5 billion, respectively. These amounts include a $5.0 billion three-year revolving credit facility with TMS which currently expires in fiscal 2026. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, total financing support available to affiliates totaled approximately $7.8 billion and $8.0 billion, respectively. The amounts outstanding under these agreements are recorded in Other assets and Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2023 and 2022.

Financing Support Provided by Parent and Affiliates (amounts in millions):In April 2023, TMCC entered into a one-year revolving credit agreement with TMS, pursuant to which TMS is entitled to borrow a maximum amount of $500 million.

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts outstanding (USD) at

 

Affiliate

 

Financing available to TMCC

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toyota Credit Canada Inc.

 

CAD

 

 

1,500

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V.

 

Euro

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Toyota Financial Services Americas Corporation

 

USD

 

 

200

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

24

 

Toyota Finance Australia Limited

 

USD

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Toyota Financial Services Securities USA Corporation

 

USD

 

 

15

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

20

 

 

$

24

 

Financing Support Provided to Parent and Affiliates (amounts in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts outstanding (USD) at

 

Affiliate

 

Financing made available by TMCC

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Toyota Financial Savings Bank

 

USD

 

 

400

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

25

 

Toyota Credit Canada Inc.

 

CAD

 

 

2,500

 

 

 

220

 

 

 

-

 

Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V.

 

Euro

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

619

 

 

 

778

 

Toyota Financial Services Americas Corporation

 

USD

 

 

200

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Toyota Financial Services Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

 

USD

 

 

500

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Banco Toyota do Brasil

 

USD

 

 

300

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

81

 

Toyota Finance Australia Limited

 

USD

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

280

 

 

 

300

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,177

 

 

$

1,184

 


127


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 15 – Related Party Transactions (Continued)

Other Financing Support Provided to Affiliates

·

TMCC provides home loans to certain employees.  In addition, we also provide home equity advances through a relocation provider to certain employees relocating to Texas.  TMCC executive officers and directors are not eligible for the home loan or home equity advance programs.

·

TMCC provides wholesale financing, real estate and working capital loans to certain dealerships that were consolidated with another affiliate under the accounting guidance for variable interest entities.  TMCC also pays these dealers origination fees.  These costs represent direct costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of retail and lease contracts, including incentive and rate participation.

·

TMCC has guaranteed the payments of principal and interest with respect to the bonds of manufacturing facilities of certain affiliates. The nature, business purpose, and amounts of these guarantees are described in Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies.

·

TMCC and TFSB are parties to a master participation agreement pursuant to which TMCC agreed to purchase up to $60 million per year of residential mortgage loans originated by TFSB that meet specified credit underwriting guidelines, not to exceed $150 million over a three year period. At March 31, 2016 and 2015, there were $37 million and $47 million, respectively, in loan participations outstanding that had been purchased by TMCC under this agreement.

TMCC provides wholesale financing, real estate and working capital loans to certain dealerships that were consolidated with another affiliate under the accounting guidance for variable interest entities. TMCC also pays these dealers origination fees. These costs represent direct costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of retail and lease contracts, including subvention and other cash incentive programs.

TMCC has guaranteed the payments of principal and interest with respect to the bonds of manufacturing facilities of certain affiliates. The nature, business purpose, and amounts of these guarantees are described in Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies.

TMCC and TFSB are parties to a master participation agreement pursuant to which TMCC agreed to purchase no more than $60 million per year of residential mortgage loans originated by TFSB that meet specified credit underwriting guidelines. At March 31, 2023 and 2022, we had $8 million, respectively, in loan participations outstanding that had been purchased by TMCC under this agreement.

101


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 12 – Related Party Transactions (Continued)

Shared Service Arrangements with Affiliates

TMCC is subject to the following shared service agreements:

·

TMCC and TCPR incur costs under various shared service agreements with our affiliates.  Services provided by affiliates under the shared service arrangement include marketing, technological and administrative services, as well as services related to our funding and risk management activities and our bank and investor relationships.

TMCC incurs costs under various shared service agreements with TMNA and other affiliates. Services provided by affiliates under the shared service agreements include certain technological and administrative services, such as information systems support, facilities, insurance coverage, human resources and other corporate services. TMCC may also participate and incur costs in shared marketing efforts with TMNA.

·

TMCC provides various services to our financial services affiliates, including certain administrative, systems and operational support.  

TMCC provides various services to its subsidiaries and affiliates, including certain administrative and corporate services, operational support, information systems support, facilities, treasury, and vendor management services.

·

TMCC provides various services to TFSB, including marketing, administrative, systems, and operational support in exchange for TFSB making available certain financial products and services to TMCC’s customers and dealers meeting TFSB’s credit standards.  

TMCC provides various services to TFSB, including marketing, administrative, systems, and operational support in exchange for TFSB making available certain financial products and services to TMCC’s customers and dealers meeting TFSB’s credit standards. TMCC is party to a master netting agreement with TFSB, which allows TMCC to net settle payments for shared services between TMCC and TFSB.

·

TMCC is a party to expense reimbursement agreements with TFSB and TFSC related to costs incurred by TMCC or these affiliates on behalf of the other party in connection with TMCC’s provision of services to these affiliates or the provision by these affiliates of certain financial products and services to our customers and dealers in support of TMCC’s customer loyalty strategy and programs, and other brand and sales support.  TMCC is also party to an expense reimbursement agreement with TFSA that reimbursed expenses incurred by TFSA with respect to costs related to TFSB’s credit card rewards program.  TFSB sold its credit card rewards portfolio in October 2015 and no credit card reward program costs have been incurred after such date.

TMCC is a party to expense reimbursement agreements with TFSB and TFSC related to costs incurred by TMCC or these affiliates on behalf of the other party in connection with TMCC’s provision of services to these affiliates or the provision by these affiliates of certain financial products and services to our customers and dealers in support of TMCC’s customer loyalty strategy and programs, and other brand and sales support.
TMCC receives support from and provides support to TFSC and other affiliates in the form of promissory notes and various loan and credit facility agreements, including a revolving credit facility with TMS, which may be used for general corporate purposes.
TMCC and TFSB are parties to a services agreement, entered into July 2021, wherein TMCC will subservice loans on behalf of TFSB.


128102


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1512 – Related Party Transactions (Continued)

Operational Support Arrangements with Affiliates

·

TMCC and TCPR provide various wholesale financing to dealers, which result in our having payables to TMS and Toyota de Puerto Rico Corp (“TDPR”).

TMCC and TCPR provide various wholesale financing to dealers, which result in us having payables to TMNA and Toyota de Puerto Rico Corp.

·

TMCC is party to a lease agreement with TMS for our headquarters location in the TMS headquarters complex in Torrance, California, expiring in 2018, and our Customer Service Center located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, expiring in 2019.  The lease commitments are described in Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies.

TMCC is party to a lease agreement with TMNA for our headquarters facility in Plano, Texas, expiring in 2032, a customer service center located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, expiring in 2029, and our Dallas Data Center expiring in 2026. The lease commitments are described in Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies.

·

Subvention support receivable from affiliates represent amounts due from TMS and other affiliates in support of retail and lease subvention programs offered by TMCC.  Deferred subvention income from affiliates represents the unearned portion of amounts received from these transactions, and manufacturers’ subvention support and other revenues primarily represent the earned portion of such amounts.  

Subvention receivable represents amounts due from TMNA and other affiliates in support of retail and lease subvention and other cash incentive programs offered by TMCC. Deferred subvention income represents the unearned portion of amounts received from these transactions, and manufacturers’ subvention and other revenues primarily represent the earned portion of such amounts.

·

Leases to affiliates represent the investment in operating leases of vehicles leased to affiliates.  

Investment in operating leases includes contractual residual value support received from affiliates which are recognized as an offset to depreciation expense over the life of the contract.

·

TMCC is a participating employer in certain retirement, postretirement health care and life insurance sponsored by TMS.  See Note 12 – Pension and Other Benefit Plans for additional information.  TMCC also participates in share-based compensation plans sponsored by TMC.

TMCC is a participating employer in certain retirement, post-retirement medical care and life insurance benefits sponsored by TMNA. Refer to Note 10 – Pension and Other Benefit Plans for additional information.

·

Affiliate insurance premiums and contract revenues primarily represent revenues from TMIS for administrative services and various types of coverage provided to TMS and affiliates.  This includes contractual indemnity coverage and related administrative services for TMS’ certified pre-owned vehicle program and umbrella liability policy.  TMIS provides umbrella liability insurance to TMS and affiliates covering certain dollar value layers of risk above various primary or self-insured retentions.  On all layers in which TMIS has provided coverage, 99 percent of the risk has been ceded to various reinsurers.  During fiscal 2012, TMIS began providing property deductible reimbursement insurance to TMS and affiliates covering losses incurred under their primary policy.

TMCC is party to agreements with TMNA and other affiliates relating to the team member vehicle benefit program, which allows team members to lease Toyota and Lexus vehicles on terms exclusive to the benefit program. TMNA serves as the chief administrator of the program. TMCC acquires and services team member leases after origination. A portion of the vehicles used for the team member vehicle benefit program are acquired from TMNA. TMCC receives a per vehicle contribution from participating affiliates to assist with the costs of its contribution to the benefit program, and TMCC pays a per vehicle participation fee to TMNA to participate in the benefit program.

·

On October 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our commercial finance business to TICF.  As part of this transaction, we entered into an Expense Reimbursement Agreement with TICF relating to certain expenses incurred by TMCC and a Transition Services Agreement relating to certain post-close services to be provided by TMCC to TICF.

Affiliate voluntary protection contract revenues and insurance earned premiums primarily represent revenues from TMIS for coverage and related administrative services provided to TMNA and other affiliates. This includes contractual indemnity coverage for limited warranties on certified Toyota and Lexus pre-owned vehicles and related administrative services for TMNA’s certified pre-owned vehicle program and umbrella liability policy. TMIS also provides umbrella liability insurance to TMNA and other affiliates covering certain dollar value layers of risk above various primary or self-insured retentions. On all layers in which TMIS has provided coverage, 99 percent of the risk has been ceded to a reinsurer.

129103


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 13 – Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to determine the fair value of our assets and liabilities, we use quoted prices for identical or similar instruments, otherwise we utilize valuation models with observable or calculated inputs. The use of observable quotes for identical or similar instruments and the use of unobservable inputs is reflected in the fair value hierarchy assessment disclosed in the tables within this Note as Level 1, 2 and 3 defined below. The availability of observable inputs can vary based upon the financial instrument and other factors, such as instrument type, market liquidity and other specific characteristics particular to the financial instrument. To the extent that a valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires additional judgment by management. We use prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market disruption. In periods of market disruption, the availability of prices and inputs may be reduced for certain financial instruments. This condition could result in a financial instrument being reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level 3.

Level 1: Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and may require significant judgment in order to determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities.

Valuation Adjustments

We may make valuation adjustments to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, our own creditworthiness, as well as constraints due to market illiquidity or unobservable parameters.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Cash and cash equivalents and Restricted cash and cash equivalents

The fair value of cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents approximates the carrying value and these instruments are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.

Investments in marketable securities

We estimate the value of our AFS debt securities, including those for which the fair value option was elected, using observed transaction prices, independent third-party pricing valuation vendors, and internal valuation models.

We may hold investments in actively traded open-end and private placement equity investments. Where the equity investments produce a daily net asset value that is quoted in an active market, we use this value to determine the fair value of the equity investment and classify the investment as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of equity investments that produce a daily net asset value that is not quoted in an active market is estimated using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient and are excluded from leveling within the fair value hierarchy.

In addition, we may hold individual securities where valuation methodologies and inputs to valuation models depend on the security type, thus they may be classified differently within the leveling hierarchy. Where possible, quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar securities are used to determine the fair value of the investment securities; those securities are classified as Level 1 or 2, respectively. Where quoted prices in active markets are not available, we use various valuation models for each asset class that are consistent with what market participants use. The inputs and assumptions to the models are derived from market observable sources including: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and other market-related data. These investments are generally classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy, however, depending on the significance of the unobservable inputs they may also be classified as Level 3.

104


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 13 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Derivatives

We estimate the fair value of our derivatives using industry standard valuation models that require observable market inputs, including market prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, volatilities, counterparty credit risk, our own non-performance risk and the contractual terms of the derivative instruments. We consider counterparty credit risk and our own non-performance risk through credit valuation adjustments.

For derivatives that trade in liquid markets, model inputs can generally be verified and do not require significant management judgment. These derivative instruments are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

Certain other derivative transactions trade in less liquid markets with limited pricing information. For such derivatives, key inputs to the valuation process include quotes from counterparties and other market data used to corroborate and adjust values where appropriate. Other market data includes values obtained from a market participant that serves as a third-party valuation vendor. These derivative instruments are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

Nonrecurring fair value measurements include Level 3 net finance receivables that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis but are subject to fair value adjustments utilizing the fair value of the underlying collateral when there is evidence of impairment. Nonrecurring fair value items as of March 31, 2023 and 2022 were not significant. Retail finance receivables greater than 120 days past due are measured at fair value based on the fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell. The fair value of collateral is based on the current average selling prices for like vehicles at wholesale used vehicle auctions.

105


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 13 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following tables summarize our financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy except for certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient and are excluded from the leveling information provided in the tables below. Fair value amounts presented below are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

netting &

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

collateral

 

 

value

 

Investments in marketable securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

$

740

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

744

 

Foreign government and agency obligations

 

 

-

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

12

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

8

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

430

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

430

 

Mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency

 

 

-

 

 

 

73

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

73

 

Non-agency residential

 

 

-

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9

 

Non-agency commercial

 

 

-

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

58

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

120

 

Available-for-sale debt securities total

 

 

740

 

 

 

666

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,454

 

Equity investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income mutual funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income mutual funds measured at
   net asset value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,081

 

Total return bond funds

 

 

1,631

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,631

 

Equity mutual funds

 

 

871

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

871

 

Equity investments total

 

 

2,502

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,583

 

Investments in marketable securities total

 

 

3,242

 

 

 

666

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,037

 

Derivative assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,888

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,888

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

49

 

Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,886

)

 

 

(1,886

)

Derivative assets total

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,937

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,886

)

 

 

51

 

Assets at fair value

 

 

3,242

 

 

 

2,603

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

(1,886

)

 

 

5,088

 

Derivative liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

(468

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(468

)

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,002

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,002

)

Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,453

 

 

 

1,453

 

Liabilities at fair value

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,470

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,453

 

 

 

(17

)

Net assets at fair value

 

$

3,242

 

 

$

1,133

 

 

$

48

 

 

$

(433

)

 

$

5,071

 

106


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 13 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

 

 

 

March 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Counterparty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

netting &

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

collateral

 

 

value

 

Investments in marketable securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency obligations

 

$

504

 

 

$

5

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

509

 

Foreign government and agency obligations

 

 

-

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

23

 

Municipal debt securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

568

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

568

 

Mortgage-backed securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency

 

 

-

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

20

 

Non-agency residential

 

 

-

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10

 

Non-agency commercial

 

 

-

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

86

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

-

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

78

 

Available-for-sale debt securities total

 

 

504

 

 

 

786

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,304

 

Equity investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income mutual funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income mutual funds measured at
   net asset value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,137

 

Total return bond funds

 

 

1,576

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,576

 

Equity mutual funds

 

 

936

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

936

 

Equity investments total

 

 

2,512

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,649

 

Investments in marketable securities total

 

 

3,016

 

 

 

786

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,953

 

Derivative assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,425

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,425

 

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

55

 

Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,419

)

 

 

(1,419

)

Derivative assets total

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,480

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,419

)

 

 

61

 

Assets at fair value

 

 

3,016

 

 

 

2,266

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

(1,419

)

 

 

5,014

 

Derivative liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

(822

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(822

)

Foreign currency swaps

 

 

-

 

 

 

(717

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(717

)

Counterparty netting and collateral

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,514

 

 

 

1,514

 

Liabilities at fair value

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,539

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,514

 

 

 

(25

)

Net assets at fair value

 

$

3,016

 

 

$

727

 

 

$

14

 

 

$

95

 

 

$

4,989

 

Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

The Level 3 financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value which are subject to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurement, and the corresponding activity and change in the fair value measurements of these assets and liabilities, were not significant to our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, or Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.

107


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1613 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value

Finance receivables

Our finance receivables consist of retail loans and dealer financing loans, which are comprised of wholesale, real estate and working capital financing. Retail finance receivables are primarily valued using a securitization model that incorporates expected cash flows. Cash flows expected to be collected are estimated using contractual principal and interest payments adjusted for specific factors, such as prepayments, extensions, default rates, loss severity, credit scores, and collateral type. The securitization model utilizes quoted secondary market rates if available, or estimated market rates that incorporate management's best estimate of investor assumptions about the portfolio. The dealer financing portfolio is valued using a discounted cash flow model. Discount rates are derived based on market rates for equivalent portfolio bond ratings. As these valuations utilize unobservable inputs, our finance receivables are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

Unsecured notes and loans payable

The fair value of commercial paper is assumed to approximate the carrying value due to its short duration and generally negligible credit risk. We validate this assumption by recalculating the fair value of our commercial paper using quoted market rates. Commercial paper is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

Other unsecured notes and loans payable are primarily valued using current market rates and credit spreads for debt with similar maturities. Our valuation models utilize observable inputs such as standard industry curves; therefore, we classify these unsecured notes and loans payables as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. When observable inputs are not available for all assumptions, we estimate the fair value using internal assumptions such as volatility and expected credit losses. As these valuations utilize unobservable inputs, we classify these unsecured notes and loans payable as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

Secured notes and loans payable

Fair value is estimated based on current market rates and credit spreads for debt with similar maturities. We also use internal assumptions, including prepayment speeds and expected credit losses on the underlying securitized assets, to estimate the timing of cash flows to be paid on these instruments. As these valuations utilize unobservable inputs, our secured notes and loans payables are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

108


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 13 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

The following tables provide information about assets and liabilities not carried at fair value on a recurring basis on our Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

 

March 31, 2023

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Fair

 

 

 

value

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

value

 

Financial assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

$

78,445

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

77,649

 

 

$

77,649

 

Wholesale

 

 

3,972

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,968

 

 

 

3,968

 

Real estate

 

 

4,981

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,990

 

 

 

4,990

 

Working capital

 

 

3,113

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,058

 

 

 

3,058

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured notes and loans payable

 

$

78,949

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

76,401

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

76,401

 

Secured notes and loans payable

 

 

32,736

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

32,173

 

 

 

32,173

 

 

 

March 31, 2022

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Fair

 

 

 

value

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

value

 

Financial assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail loan

 

$

72,369

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

73,385

 

 

$

73,385

 

Wholesale

 

 

2,940

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,931

 

 

 

2,931

 

Real estate

 

 

4,985

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,961

 

 

 

4,961

 

Working capital

 

 

2,256

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,171

 

 

 

2,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured notes and loans payable

 

$

82,288

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

80,980

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

80,980

 

Secured notes and loans payable

 

$

26,864

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

26,500

 

 

$

26,500

 

Accrued interest related to finance receivables is in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets; however, TMCC measures the fair value of each class of finance receivables using scheduled principal and interest payments. Therefore, accrued interest has been included in the carrying value of each class of finance receivables in the previous tables, along with finance receivables, deferred origination costs, deferred income, and allowance for credit losses.

Finance receivables in the previous tables exclude related party transactions which are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. The previous tables also exclude related party notes receivables and notes payables recorded in Other assets and Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets which are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Note 12 - Related Party Transactions for additional information.

109


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 14 – Segment Information

Our reportable segments include financeare Finance operations and insuranceVoluntary protection operations. Finance operations include retail, leasing, and dealer financing provided to authorized dealers and their customers in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. InsuranceVoluntary protection operations are performed by TMIS and its subsidiaries.  The principal activities of TMIS include marketing, underwriting, and claims administration for products that cover certain risks of dealers and their customers in the U.S.  The finance and insurance operations segment information presented below includes allocated corporate expenses for the respective segments.  The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

Financial information for our reportable operating segments, which includes allocated corporate expenses, is summarized as follows:

 

 

Year ended March 31, 2016

 

 

 

Finance

 

 

Insurance

 

 

Intercompany

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

operations

 

 

operations

 

 

eliminations

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total financing revenues

 

$

9,403

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

9,403

 

Insurance earned premiums and contract revenues

 

 

-

 

 

 

719

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

719

 

Investment and other income, net

 

 

99

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

164

 

Gain on sale of commercial finance business

 

 

197

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

197

 

Total gross revenues

 

 

9,699

 

 

 

784

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10,483

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

5,914

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,914

 

Interest expense

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,137

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

441

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

441

 

Operating and administrative expenses

 

 

909

 

 

 

252

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,161

 

Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses

 

 

-

 

 

 

318

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

318

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

501

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

580

 

Net income

 

$

797

 

 

$

135

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

932

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

111,627

 

 

$

4,161

 

 

$

(1,065

)

 

$

114,723

 

 

 

Year ended March 31, 2023

 

 

 

Finance

 

 

Voluntary protection

 

 

Intercompany

 

 

 

 

 

 

operations

 

 

operations

 

 

eliminations

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total financing revenues

 

$

11,293

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

11,293

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

5,122

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,122

 

Interest expense

 

 

3,054

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,054

 

Net financing revenues

 

 

3,117

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voluntary protection contract revenues
  and insurance earned premiums

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,053

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,053

 

Investment and other income (loss), net

 

 

314

 

 

 

(217

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

97

 

Net financing and other revenues

 

 

3,431

 

 

 

836

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,267

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

713

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

713

 

Operating and administrative

 

 

1,331

 

 

 

445

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,776

 

Voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses

 

 

-

 

 

 

470

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

470

 

Total expenses

 

 

2,044

 

 

 

915

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,959

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

1,387

 

 

 

(79

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,308

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

346

 

 

 

(17

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

329

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

1,041

 

 

$

(62

)

 

$

-

 

 

$

979

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

131,093

 

 

$

6,638

 

 

$

(136

)

 

$

137,595

 


130110


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 1614 – Segment Information (Continued)

 

Year ended March 31, 2015

 

 

Year ended March 31, 2022

 

 

Finance

 

 

Insurance

 

 

Intercompany

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance

 

 

Voluntary protection

 

 

Intercompany

 

 

 

 

 

operations

 

 

operations

 

 

eliminations

 

 

Total

 

 

operations

 

 

operations

 

 

eliminations

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total financing revenues

 

$

8,310

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

8,310

 

 

$

11,920

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

11,920

 

Insurance earned premiums and contract revenues

 

 

-

 

 

 

638

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

638

 

Investment and other income, net

 

 

89

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

194

 

Total gross revenues

 

 

8,399

 

 

 

743

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,142

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

4,857

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,857

 

 

 

5,846

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,846

 

Interest expense

 

 

736

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

736

 

 

 

1,401

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,401

 

Net financing revenues

 

 

4,673

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,673

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voluntary protection contract revenues
and insurance earned premiums

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,015

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,015

 

Investment and other income (loss), net

 

 

45

 

 

 

(71

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(26

)

Net financing and other revenues

 

 

4,718

 

 

 

944

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,662

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

308

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

236

 

Operating and administrative expenses

 

 

825

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,046

 

Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses

 

 

-

 

 

 

269

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

269

 

Operating and administrative

 

 

1,311

 

 

 

386

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,697

 

Voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses

 

 

-

 

 

 

405

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

405

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,547

 

 

 

791

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,338

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

3,171

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,324

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

635

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

729

 

 

 

755

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

789

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,038

 

 

$

159

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

1,197

 

 

$

2,416

 

 

$

119

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

2,535

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

106,653

 

 

$

3,891

 

 

$

(919

)

 

$

109,625

 

 

$

128,684

 

 

$

6,510

 

 

$

(153

)

 

$

135,041

 

 

 

Year ended March 31, 2021

 

 

 

Finance

 

 

Voluntary protection

 

 

Intercompany

 

 

 

 

 

 

operations

 

 

operations

 

 

eliminations

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total financing revenues

 

$

11,799

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

11,799

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

5,932

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

5,932

 

Interest expense

 

 

2,302

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,302

 

Net financing revenues

 

 

3,565

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

3,565

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voluntary protection contract revenues
  and insurance earned premiums

 

 

-

 

 

 

956

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

956

 

Investment and other income, net

 

 

93

 

 

 

317

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

410

 

Net financing and other revenues

 

 

3,658

 

 

 

1,273

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,931

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

426

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

426

 

Operating and administrative

 

 

1,124

 

 

 

363

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,487

 

Voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses

 

 

-

 

 

 

369

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

369

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,550

 

 

 

732

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,282

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

2,108

 

 

 

541

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,649

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

502

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

632

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,606

 

 

$

411

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

2,017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

127,726

 

 

$

6,149

 

 

$

(147

)

 

$

133,728

 

 

 

Year ended March 31, 2014

 

 

 

Finance

 

 

Insurance

 

 

Intercompany

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

operations

 

 

operations

 

 

eliminations

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total financing revenues

 

$

7,371

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

26

 

 

$

7,397

 

Insurance earned premiums and contract revenues

 

 

-

 

 

 

593

 

 

 

(26

)

 

 

567

 

Investment and other income, net

 

 

98

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

135

 

Total gross revenues

 

 

7,469

 

 

 

630

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

8,099

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

4,012

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,012

 

Interest expense

 

 

1,340

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,340

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

170

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

170

 

Operating and administrative expenses

 

 

767

 

 

 

198

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

965

 

Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses

 

 

-

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

258

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

437

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

497

 

Net income

 

$

743

 

 

$

114

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

857

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

99,737

 

 

$

3,728

 

 

$

(725

)

 

$

102,740

 


131111


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 14 – Segment Information (Continued)

Note 17 – Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)Voluntary protection operations

The voluntary protection operations segment offers vehicle and payment protection products on Toyota, Lexus and other domestic and import vehicles that are primarily sold by dealers along with the sale of a vehicle.

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

Year ended March 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total financing revenues

 

$

2,255

 

 

$

2,353

 

 

$

2,376

 

 

$

2,419

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

1,360

 

 

 

1,446

 

 

 

1,503

 

 

 

1,605

 

Interest expense

 

 

508

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

277

 

 

 

149

 

Net financing revenues

 

 

387

 

 

 

704

 

 

 

596

 

 

 

665

 

Other income

 

 

212

 

 

 

192

 

 

 

248

 

 

 

231

 

Gain on sale of commercial finance business

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

197

 

 

 

-

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

45

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

128

 

 

 

163

 

Expenses

 

 

349

 

 

 

365

 

 

 

361

 

 

 

404

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

205

 

 

 

426

 

 

 

552

 

 

 

329

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

70

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

139

 

Net income

 

$

135

 

 

$

265

 

 

$

342

 

 

$

190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended March 31, 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total financing revenues

 

$

1,960

 

 

$

2,057

 

 

$

2,112

 

 

$

2,181

 

Depreciation on operating leases

 

 

1,100

 

 

 

1,196

 

 

 

1,248

 

 

 

1,313

 

Interest expense

 

 

130

 

 

 

215

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

230

 

Net financing revenues

 

 

730

 

 

 

646

 

 

 

703

 

 

 

638

 

Other income

 

 

188

 

 

 

220

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

203

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

38

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

88

 

Expenses

 

 

303

 

 

 

320

 

 

 

329

 

 

 

363

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

577

 

 

 

467

 

 

 

492

 

 

 

390

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

213

 

 

 

176

 

 

 

185

 

 

 

155

 

Net income

 

$

364

 

 

$

291

 

 

$

307

 

 

$

235

 

Other income is comprised of insurance earned premiums andVoluntary protection contract revenues

We receive the contractually determined dealer cost at the inception of the contract. Revenue is then deferred and recognized over the term of the contract according to earnings factors established by management that are based upon historical loss experience. Contracts sold range in term from 3 to 120 months and are typically cancellable at any time. The effect of subsequent cancellations is recorded as wellan offset to unearned voluntary protection contract revenues in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

For the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, approximately 83 percent and 82 percent of voluntary protection contract revenues in the Voluntary protection operations segment were accounted for under the guidance for revenue from contracts with customers.

The Voluntary protection operations segment defers contractually determined incentives paid to dealers as net investmentcontract costs for selling voluntary protection products. These costs are recorded in Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and other income. Expenses include operatingare amortized to Operating and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income using a methodology consistent with the recognition of revenue. The amount of capitalized dealer incentives and the related amortization was not significant to our consolidated financial statements as wellof and for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.

We had $2.7 billion and $2.5 billion and of unearned voluntary protection contract revenues from contracts with customers included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, respectively. We recognized $800 million of the unearned amounts in voluntary protection contract revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Income during fiscal 2023, compared to $704 million during fiscal 2022. As of March 31, 2023, we had unearned voluntary protection contract revenues of $2.9 billion included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, and with respect to this balance, we expect to recognize revenue of approximately $827 million in fiscal 2024 and $2.1 billion thereafter.

Insurance earned premiums

Revenues from providing coverage under various insurance contracts are recognized over the term of the coverage in relation to the timing and level of anticipated claims. Revenues from insurance policies, net of premiums ceded to reinsurers, are earned over the terms of the respective policies in proportion to the estimated loss development. Management relies on historical loss experience as a basis for establishing earnings factors used to recognize revenue over the term of the contract or policy.

Voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses

Voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses include amounts paid and accrued for loss events that are known and have been recorded as claims, estimates of losses incurred but not reported based on actuarial estimates and historical loss development patterns, and loss adjustment expenses.expenses that are expected to be incurred in connection with settling and paying these claims.

Accruals for unpaid losses, losses incurred but not reported, and loss adjustment expenses are included in Other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These accruals arising from contracts entered into by TMIS are not significant as of March 31, 2023 and 2022. Estimated liabilities are reviewed regularly, and we recognize any adjustments in the periods in which they are determined. If anticipated losses, loss adjustment expenses, and unamortized acquisition and maintenance costs exceed the recorded unearned premium, a premium deficiency is recognized by first charging any unamortized acquisition costs to expense and then by recording a liability for any excess deficiency.

112


Table of Contents

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions)

Note 14 – Segment Information (Continued)


Risk Transfer

Our voluntary protection operations transfer certain risks to protect us against the impact of unpredictable high severity losses. The amounts recoverable from reinsurers and other companies that assume liabilities relating to our Voluntary protection operations are determined in a manner consistent with the related reinsurance or risk transfer contract. Amounts recoverable from reinsurers and other companies on unpaid losses are recorded as receivables but are not collectible until the losses are paid. Revenues related to risks transferred are recognized on the same basis as the related revenues from the underlying contracts. Covered losses are recorded as a reduction to Voluntary protection contract expenses and insurance losses.

113


Table of Contents

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTSACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There is nothing to report with regard to this item.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and regulations of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)(the principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)(the principal financial officer), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our CEO and CFO evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures asAs of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures’ as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2016.2023.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or because the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted, under the supervision of our CEO and CFO, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, commonly referred to as the “COSO” criteria. Based on the assessment performed, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2016.2023.

Attestation report of the registered public accounting firm. This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report is not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 20162023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

114



Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

TMCC has omitted certain information in this section pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the directors and executive officers of TMCC as of May 31, 2016.June 2, 2023.

Name

Age

Position

Michael GroffMark S. Templin

6162

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, TMCC;

RegionalDirector, President and Chief ExecutiveOperating Officer, Americas, TFSATFSIC;

Director and Group Chief Operating Officer, TFSC

Toshiaki Kawai

54

Director, Executive Vice PresidentTMNA

Director and Treasurer, TMCC;

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer, TFSAChairman, TFSB

Chris BallingerScott Cooke

5952

Director, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, TMCC;TMCC

Chief Financial Officer, Strategic Innovation, TFSATFSIC

Ron ChuAlec Hagey

5857

Director, Senior Vice President Accounting & Tax, TMCC;

Vice President, Tax, TFSAand Chief Operations Officer, TMCC

Riki InuzukaMao Saka

5752

Director and Treasurer, TMCC

Director, TFSIC

Ellen L. Farrell

58

Group Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Legal, Compliance and Administrative Officer and Secretary, TMCC;

Secretary, TFSIC

Director, TFSB

Grace A. Mullings

62

Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, TMCC

Anna Sampang

53

Group Vice President – Service Operations, TMCC

Hiroyoshi Korosue

61

Director, TMCC;

Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, TFSA;TFSIC;

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, TFSC;

ManagingChief Officer, Sales Finance Business Group, TMC

James E. Lentz IIITetsuo Ogawa

6063

Director, TMCC;

Director, President and Chief Operating Officer, TMNA;

Senior Managing Officer, TMC

Kazuo Ohara

58

Director, TMCC;

Senior Vice President, TMNA;

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, TMS;TMNA;

ManagingOperating Officer, TMC

Tetsuya OtakeJack Hollis

5556

Director, TMCC;

Director, TFSC;

Chief Accounting Officer, TMC;

Managing Officer, TMC

Mark Templin

55

Director and Chairman, TMCC;President, TMS;

Director,Executive Vice President, and Chief Operating Officer, TFSA;

Director, TFSC;

Managing Officer, TMCTMNA;


115


Table of Contents


All directors of TMCC are elected annually and hold office until their successors are elected and qualified. Officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Mr. GroffTemplin was named President and Chief Executive Officer of TMCC in October 2013 and has served as aSeptember 2018. He was named Director of TMCC since January 2013.  Mr. Groff was named Regional Chief Executive Officer, Americas of TFSA in April 2016.  He previously held the positions of President and Chief Executive Officer of TFSA from June 2015 to AprilMay 2016 and served as a DirectorChairman of TFSAthe TMCC Board of Directors from October 2013May 2016 to April 2016.  From October 2013 to June 2015, Mr. Groff also served as a Director of TFSC.   From January 2013 to October 2013, he served as Senior Vice President, Sales, Product and Marketing of TMCC.  From 2008 to January 2013, he served as Group Vice President, Sales, Marketing and Product Development.  Mr. Groff has been employed with TMCC in various positions since 1983.

Mr. Kawai was named Director, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of TMCC in January 2014.  Mr. Kawai was named Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TFSA in April 2016.   He previously held the positions of Director, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of TFSA from  January 2014 to April 2016.  From January 2013 to December 2013, Mr. Kawai served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Planning Group, Planning and Accounting Team and (from January 2013 to June 2013) General Administration Group of TFSC. From January 2008 to December 2012, Mr. Kawai served as Group Vice President of TFSC and from February 2002 to December 2007, he served as Vice President of TFSC.  Mr. Kawai first joined TMC in 1998.

Mr. Ballinger was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TMCC in January 2013 and has served as a Director of TMCC since October 2013.  Mr. Ballinger was named Chief Officer, Strategic Innovation of TFSA in April 2016.  From July 2015 to April 2016, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TFSA.  From October 2013 to July 2015, he served as Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TFSA.    From June 2013 to September 2013, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TFSA, and from October 2008 to June 2013, he served as Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TFSA.  From September 2008 to December 2012, Mr. Ballinger served as Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TMCC, and from December 2006 to September 2008, he served as  Group Vice President of TMCC.  When Mr. Ballinger was promoted to Group Vice President of TMCC in December 2006 he also assumed the responsibility for Global Treasury for Toyota Financial Services Corporation.  Mr. Ballinger joined TMCC in September 2003 as Corporate Manager – Treasury, overseeing the Financial Risk Management, Sales and Trading, Capital Markets and Cash Management groups.  Prior to joining TMCC, he served as Assistant Treasurer for Providian Financial and Senior Vice President of Treasury for Bank of America.

Mr. Chu was named Vice President, Accounting & Tax of TMCC in June 2010.  Mr. Chu was named Vice President, Tax of TFSA in April 2011.  From September 2007 to June 2010, Mr. Chu served as Corporate Manager, Tax.  Mr. Chu joined TMCC in March 2002 as National Manager, Tax.  Prior to joining TMCC, he served as Director of Tax for Asia Global Crossing and Senior Manager for KPMG, LLP, in Los Angeles.  Mr. Chu is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in California.

Mr. Inuzuka was named as a Director of TMCC in September 2015. In June 2015, Mr. Inuzuka was named as a Director of TFSA and, in April 2016, he was also named Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TFSA.  In April 2015, Mr. Inuzuka became an Advisor to TFSC and in May 2015 was named Director and President of TFSC.  Mr. Inuzuka has also served as a Managing Officer of TMC since April 2011, and in April 2016, he was also named Chief Officer, Sales Finance Business Group of TMC.  Mr. Inuzuka was a General Manager of TMC from January 2004 to March 2011.  Mr. Inuzuka first joined Toyota Motor Co., Ltd. (currently TMC) in April 1982.

Mr. Lentz was named as a Director of TMCC in June 2006.August 2018. He was named a Director, President and Chief Operating Officer of TMNA in April 2013.  Mr. Lentz served as President and Chief Executive Officer of TMS from April 2012 until March 2013 after having served as President and Chief Operating Officer of TMS since November 2007.  Mr. Lentz is currently a Director of TMCC and TMS and prior to his promotion to President, he served as Executive Vice President of TMS from July 2006 to November 2007.  Prior to this, he held the positions of Group Vice President - Toyota Division from April 2005 to July 2006, Group Vice President Marketing from April 2004 to April 2005 and Vice President Marketing from December 2002 to March 2004.  In addition, from 2001 to 2002 Mr. Lentz was the Vice President of Scion.  From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Lentz was the Vice President and General Manager of the Los Angeles Region.  Mr. Lentz has been employed with TMS, in various positions, since 1982.

Mr. Ohara was named as a Director of TMCC in June 2013.  In April 2013, Mr. Ohara was named Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of TMS and Senior Vice President of Toyota Motor North America, Inc.  Mr. Ohara has also served as a Managing Officer of TMC since June 2010.  Mr. Ohara was a General Manager of TMC from June 2008 to June 2010.  Mr. Ohara first joined TMC in April 1980.


Mr. Otake was named as a Director of TMCC in December 2015.  In April 2015, Mr. Otake was named Chief Officer of the Accounting Group of TMC.  Mr. Otake has also served as a Managing Officer of TMC since April 2013.  Mr. Otake served as Deputy Chief Officer of the Accounting Group of TMC from April 2013 to March 2015.  Mr. Otake was a General Manager of TMC from January 2008 to December 2014.  Mr. Otake first joined TMC in April 1983.

Mr. Templin was named Director and Chairman of TMCC in May 2016.  Mr. Templin was named Director, President and Chief Operating Officer of TFSATFSIC in April 2016, Director of TMNA in June 2020, and Director and Chairman of TFSCTFSB in April 2016.October 2021. Mr. Templin has also served as a Director of TFSC since April 2016 and was named Group Chief Operating Officer of TFSC in September 2017. From April 2016 to September 2017, he served as Chief Marketing Officer of TFSC. From April 2013 to December 2017, Mr. Templin also served as Managing Officer of TMC, since April 2013, and infrom April 2016 to December 2017 he was also namedserved as Deputy Chief Officer of TMC’s Sales FinanceFinancial Business Group. From April 2013 to April 2016, Mr. Templin served as Executive Vice President of TMC’s Lexus International Company, and from October 2007 to March 2016, he served as Group Vice President and General Manager of TMS’s Lexus Division.  From JanuaryApril 2012 to March 2013, Mr. Templin also served as General Manager of TMC’s Lexus Planning Division. From October 2007 to March 2013, he served as Group Vice President and General Manager of TMS’s Lexus Division. Mr. Templin first joined TMS in January 1990.

Mr. Cooke was named Senior Vice President of TMCC in January 2022 and has served as Director of TMCC since June 2019. He was named as Chief Financial Officer of TMCC in April 2019 and served as a Group Vice President from December 2017 to January 2022. Mr. Cooke has served as Chief Financial Officer of TFSIC since June 2019. Prior to his appointment to Chief Financial Officer of TMCC, Mr. Cooke served as Group Vice President of Treasury, Business Intelligence, Analytics and Finance of TMCC from February 2019 to April 2019. From December 2017 to January 2019, he held the position of Group Vice President, Chief Risk Officer. Mr. Cooke served as Vice President, Chief Risk Officer from July 2015 to December 2017. Prior to that, he served as Corporate Manager, Product Planning for North American Products at TMS from July 2014 to July 2015. From August 2012 to July 2014, Mr. Cooke held the position of Corporate Manager, Dealer Credit. Mr. Cooke first joined TMCC in June 2003.


Mr. Hagey was named Director of TMCC in June 2022. He was named Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of TMCC in January 2022. He previously served as Group Vice President – Sales, Product and Marketing of TMCC from December 2018 to January 2022. Mr. Hagey served as Vice President and General Manager of the Los Angeles region at TMS from January 2015 to December 2018. Prior to this, he served as Vice President of Marketing of TMS from December 2013 to January 2015. Mr. Hagey first joined TMS in 1990.

Mr. Saka was named Director and Treasurer of TMCC in June 2019 and Director of TFSIC in January 2022. He previously served as Group Vice President of the Corporate Planning Group of TFSC from January 2016 to April 2019. From January 2013 to December 2015, Mr. Saka served as the Chief Financial Officer of Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt Ltd., a TMC affiliate in India. Prior to this, from January 2007 to December 2012, he served in the Accounting Division of TMC. Mr. Saka first joined the Finance Division of TMC in 1993.

Ms. Farrell was named Group Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Legal, Compliance and Administrative Officer and Secretary of TMCC in October 2022. She was named Director of TFSB in October 2021 and Secretary of TFSIC in May 2020. She previously served as Group Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and Secretary of TMCC from January 2022 to October 2022 and Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of TMCC from May 2020 to January 2022. Ms. Farrell also served as Vice President – Social Innovation and Executive Advisor – Legal of TMNA from November 2019 to May 2020. Prior to this, Ms. Farrell served as Vice President and Interim General Counsel of TMCC from May 2019 to November 2019, Secretary of TMCC from May 2019 to February 2020 and Secretary of TFSIC from June 2019 to February 2020. Ms. Farrell served as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel of TMNA from May 2017 to November 2019. Ms. Farrell first joined TMS in 1999.

Ms. Mullings was named Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of TMCC in August 2021 and has served as Vice President of Accounting and Corporate Controller of TMCC since March 2020. Prior to her current position, Ms. Mullings served as Senior Director of financial and regulatory reporting policies and governance at TPG Global LLC from July 2015 to March 2020. Ms. Mullings first joined TMCC in 2005 and served as Director of Accounting Policy and Governance at TMCC from April 2005 to June 2015.

116


Table of Contents

Ms. Sampang was named Group Vice President – Service Operations of TMCC in September 2019. She previously served as Vice President, Service Operations Strategy, Planning and Support of TMCC from April 2017 to September 2019. Ms. Sampang also served as Corporate Manager, Service Operations Strategy, Planning and Support of TMCC from September 2013 to March 2017. Prior to this, she served as Chief Operations Officer for TFSB from January 2012 to September 2013. Ms. Sampang first joined TMS in 1993.

Mr. Korosue was named Director of TMCC in April 2021. He was also named Chief Officer, Sales Finance Business Group of TMC, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of TFSC, and Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TFSIC in April 2021. Prior to joining TMC, Mr. Korosue held the position of Managing Executive Officer of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (“SMBC”) from April 2018 to April 2021. Prior to this, he held the following positions at SMBC: Executive Officer, Regional Head of Greater Mekong Sub-Region Country Head of Thailand, General Manager of Bangkok Branch from April 2017 to April 2018, Director, Regional Head of Greater Mekong Sub-Region, Country Head of Thailand, General Manager of Bangkok Branch from April 2015 to April 2017, General Manager, Nihonbashi-Higashi Corporate Business Office, Tokyo from April 2014 to April 2015, and General Manager, Osaka Chuo Corporate Business Office, Osaka from July 2012 to April 2014. Mr. Korosue first joined SMBC in 1986.

Mr. Ogawa was named Director of TMCC and Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of TMNA in April 2020. He was named Operating Officer of TMC in April 2023. Mr. Ogawa previously served as Chief Executive Officer, North America Region of TMC from April 2020 to March 2023, Operating Officer of TMC from January 2019 to December 2020, Chief Operating Officer, North America Region of TMC from January 2019 to April 2020 and Deputy Chief Officer - External and Public Affairs Group of TMC from January 2019 to July 2019. He served as Executive Vice President of TMNA from April 2017 to March 2020 and Senior Managing Officer of TMC from January 2018 to January 2019. He also served as Chief Administrative Officer – North America Region of TMC from April 2017 to January 2019. Prior to this, Mr. Ogawa served as Managing Officer of TMC from April 2015 to January 2018 and Deputy Chief Executive Officer – China Region of TMC and President, Toyota Motor (China) Investment Co., Ltd. from April 2015 to April 2017. From January 2012 to April 2015, he served as General Manager - China Division of TMC. Mr. Ogawa first joined TMC in 1984.

Mr. Hollis was named Director of TMCC, Executive Vice President of TMNA and Director and President of TMS in June 2022. Prior to this, he held the following positions at TMNA and TMS: Senior Vice President Automotive Operations from September 2020 to June 2022, Group Vice President & General Manager – Toyota Division from February 2017 to September 2020, Group Vice President – Marketing from December 2014 to February 2017, Vice President – Marketing from July 2012 to November 2014 and Vice President – Scion from June 2007 to June 2012. Mr. Hollis joined TMS in 1992.

117


Table of Contents

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVEEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

TMCC has omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

TMCC has omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.

TMCC has omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table represents aggregate fees billed to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Years ended March 31,

 

 

Years ended March 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Audit fees

 

$

8,960

 

 

$

8,319

 

 

$

12,275

 

 

$

11,783

 

Audit related fees

 

 

113

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Tax fees

 

 

494

 

 

 

448

 

 

 

263

 

 

 

403

 

All other fees

 

 

591

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

395

 

Total fees

 

$

10,158

 

 

$

8,814

 

 

$

12,785

 

 

$

12,581

 

Audit fees include the audits of our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, reviews of our consolidated financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and providing comfort letters, consents and other attestation reports in connection with our funding transactions.

Audit related fees primarily include reviews performed in conjunction with ourprocedures related to funding programs.programs and consultation on the interpretation of accounting standards.

Tax fees primarily include tax reporting software license fees, tax planning services, assistance in connection with tax audits, and tax compliance system license fees.

Other fees include industry research, information technology risk and process assessment review, and translation services performed in connection with our funding transactions.

Auditor Fees Pre-approval Policy

The TMCC Audit Committee charterand Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy requires that all services provided to us by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, including audit services and permitted audit-related and non-audit services, be reviewed and pre-approved by the TMCC Audit Committee.Committee and TMCC Board of Directors. All the services provided in fiscal 20162023 and 20152022 were pre-approved byin accordance with the Audit Committee.policy’s pre-approval requirements.

118


Table of Contents

PART IV


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS,EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1)Financial Statements

Included in Part II, “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K on pages 6962 through 136.113.

(a)(2)Financial StatementsStatement Schedules

Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, the information required to be contained in them is disclosed in Part II, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Credit Risk” and “Item“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K or the amounts involved are not sufficient to require submission.

(b)(a)(3)Exhibits

See Exhibit Index on page 140120.

119


Table of Contents

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

Method of

Filing

 

 

 

 

 

3.1

 

Restated Articles of Incorporation of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation filed with the California Secretary of State on April 1, 2010.

 

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

Bylaws of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation as amended through December 8, 2000.

 

(2)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(a)

 

Indenture, dated as of August 1, 1991, between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(b)

 

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1991, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Bankers Trust Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

 

(4)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(c)

 

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2004, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank (as successor to The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust Company).

 

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(d)

 

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 8, 2011, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.) as successor to The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee.

 

(6)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(e)

 

Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance, dated as of April 26, 2010, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.

 

(7)

 

 

 

 

 

4.2(a)

 

Amended and Restated Agency Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2022, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V., Toyota Credit Canada Inc., Toyota Finance Australia Limited and The Bank of New York Mellon, acting through its London branch.

 

(8)

 

 

 

 

 

4.2(b)

 

Amended and Restated Note Agency Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2021, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon S.A. /NV, Luxembourg branch, and The Bank of New York Mellon, acting through its London branch.

 

(9)

 

 

 

 

 

4.3

 

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation has outstanding certain long-term debt as set forth in Note 7 - Debt and Credit Facilities of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Not filed herein as an exhibit, pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, is any instrument which defines the rights of holders of such long-term debt, where the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation agrees to furnish copies of all such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

 

(1)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1, filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(2)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2, filed with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2000, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(3)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1(a), filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed January 24, 2018, Commission File Number 333-222676.
(4)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1(b), filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed January 24, 2018, Commission File Number 333-222676.
(5)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1(c), filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-3/A filed March 31, 2004, Commission File Number 333-113680.
(6)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2, filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 9, 2011, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(7)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1(d), filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(8)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1, filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 19, 2022, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(9)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2, filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 20, 2021, Commission File Number 1-9961.

120


Table of Contents

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

Method of

Filing

 

 

 

 

 

4.4

 

Description of Medium-Term Notes, Series B due January 11, 2028 of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation.

 

(10)

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

364 Day Credit Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2022, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V., Toyota Financial Services (UK) PLC, Toyota Credit De Puerto Rico Corp., Toyota Credit Canada Inc., Toyota Kreditbank GmbH, and Toyota Finance Australia Limited, as Borrowers, the lenders party thereto, and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Agent and Swing Line Lender, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and MUFG Bank, Ltd., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents and Swing Line Lenders, and MUFG Bank, Ltd., as a Syndication Agent.

 

(11)

 

 

 

 

 

10.2

 

Three Year Credit Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2022, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V., Toyota Financial Services (UK) PLC, Toyota Credit De Puerto Rico Corp., Toyota Credit Canada Inc., Toyota Kreditbank GMBH, and Toyota Finance Australia Limited, as Borrowers, the lenders party thereto, and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Agent and Swing Line Lender, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and MUFG Bank, LTD., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents and Swing Line Lenders, and MUFG Bank, LTD., as a Syndication Agent.

 

(12)

 

 

 

 

 

10.3

 

Five Year Credit Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2022, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V., Toyota Financial Services (UK) PLC, Toyota Credit De Puerto Rico Corp., Toyota Credit Canada Inc., Toyota Kreditbank GmbH, and Toyota Finance Australia Limited, as Borrowers, the lenders party thereto, and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Agent and Swing Line Lender, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., BofA Securities, Inc., Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and MUFG Bank, Ltd., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents and Swing Line Lenders, and MUFG Bank, Ltd., as a Syndication Agent.

 

(13)

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

Credit Support Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2000, between Toyota Financial Services Corporation and Toyota Motor Corporation.

 

(14)

 

 

 

 

 

(10)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5, filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(11)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1, filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 21, 2022, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(12)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2, filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 21, 2022, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(13)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3, filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 21, 2022, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(14)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9, filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, Commission File Number 1-9961.

121


Table of Contents

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

 

Method of

Filing

 

 

 

 

 

10.5

 

Credit Support Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2000, between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Financial Services Corporation.

 

(15)

 

 

 

 

 

10.6

 

Amended and Restated Repurchase Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2000, between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

 

(16)

 

 

 

 

 

10.7(a)

 

Credit Support Fee Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2001, between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Financial Services Corporation.

 

(17)

 

 

 

 

 

10.7(b)

 

Amendment Number 1 to Credit Support Fee Agreement, dated as of June 17, 2005, between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Financial Services Corporation.

 

(18)

 

 

 

 

 

10.7(c)

 

Amendment Number 2 to the Credit Support Fee Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2012, between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Financial Services Corporation.

 

(19)

 

 

 

 

 

10.8

 

Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2023, between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

 

(20)

 

 

 

 

 

10.9

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and its directors and officers.

 

(21)

 

 

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

Furnished Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

Furnished Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.INS

 

Inline XBRL instance document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

Inline XBRL taxonomy extension calculation linkbase document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

Inline XBRL taxonomy extension definition linkbase document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

Inline XBRL taxonomy extension labels linkbase document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

Inline XBRL taxonomy extension presentation linkbase document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

Inline XBRL taxonomy extension schema document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

104

 

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

 

Filed Herewith


(15)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10, filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(16)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11, filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(17)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13, filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(18)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13(b), filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(19)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1, filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 7, 2012, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(20)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1, filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2023, Commission File Number 1-9961.
(21)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1, filed with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2021, Commission File Number 1-9961.

122


Table of ContentsSIGNATURES

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

123


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

(Registrant)

Date: June 2, 20162023

By  /s/ Michael Groff

/s/ Mark S. Templin

Michael GroffMark S. Templin

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Michael Groff

Michael Groff

Director, President and

Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

June 2, 2016

/s/ Toshiaki Kawai

Toshiaki Kawai

Director, Executive Vice President and Treasurer

June 2, 2016

/s/ Mark S. Templin

Director, President and

June 2, 2023

/s/ Chris Ballinger

Chris BallingerMark S. Templin

Director,Chief Executive Officer

 (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Scott Cooke

Director, Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

June 2, 20162023

Scott Cooke

Chief Financial Officer

 (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Ron Chu

Ron Chu

/s/ Grace A. Mullings

Vice President and

June 2, 2023

Grace A. Mullings

Chief Accounting Officer

Accounting and Tax

(Principal Accounting Officer)

June 2, 2016

s/ Kazuo Ohara

Kazuo Ohara

Director

June 2, 2016

/s/ James E. Lentz III

James E. Lentz III

Director

June 2, 2016

/s/ Alec Hagey

Director, Senior Vice President and

June 2, 2023

____________

Riki InuzukaAlec Hagey

DirectorChief Operations Officer

June 2, 2016

____________

Tetsuya Otake

Director

June 2, 2016

____________

Mark Templin

Director

June 2, 2016

/s/ Mao Saka

Director and Treasurer

June 2, 2023

Mao Saka

Director

Hiroyoshi Korosue

Director

Tetsuo Ogawa

Director

Jack Hollis

124


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

 

Method of

Filing

 

 

 

 

 

3.1

 

Restated Articles of Incorporation filed with the California Secretary of State on April 1, 2010

 

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

Bylaws as amended through December 8, 2000

 

(2)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(a)

 

Indenture dated as of August 1, 1991 between TMCC and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(b)

 

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1991 among TMCC, Bankers Trust Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A

 

(4)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(c)

 

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2004, among TMCC, JPMorgan Chase Bank (as successor to The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.) and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust Company)

 

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(d)

 

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 8, 2011 among TMCC, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee.

 

(6)

 

 

 

 

 

4.1(e)

 

Agreement of Resignation and Acceptance dated as of April 26, 2010 between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.

 

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

4.2(a)

 

Amended and Restated Agency Agreement, dated September 11, 2015, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V., Toyota Credit Canada Inc., Toyota Finance Australia Limited and The Bank of New York Mellon.

 

(7)

(1)

Incorporated herein by reference to the same numbered Exhibit filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, Commission File Number 1-9961.

(2)

Incorporated herein by reference to the same numbered Exhibit filed with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2000, Commission File Number 1-9961.

(3)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1(a), filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-3, Commission File Number 33-52359.

(4)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 16, 1991, Commission File Number 1-9961.

(5)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1(c) filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-3, Commission File No. 333-113680.

(6)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 9, 2011, Commission File Number 1-9961.

(7)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 11, 2015, Commission File Number 1-9961.


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

 

Method of

Filing

 

 

 

 

 

4.2(b)

 

Amended and Restated Note Agency Agreement, dated September 11, 2015, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, The Bank of New York Mellon (Luxembourg) S.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon, acting through its London branch.

 

(8)

 

 

 

 

 

4.3(a)

 

Sixth Amended and Restated Agency Agreement dated September 28, 2006, among TMCC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and J.P. Morgan Bank Luxembourg S.A.

 

(9)

 

 

 

 

 

4.3(b)

 

Amendment No.1, dated as of March 4, 2011, to the Sixth Amended and Restated Agency Agreement among TMCC, The Bank of New York Mellon, acting through its London branch, as agent, and The Bank of New York Luxembourg S.A., as paying agent.

 

(10)

 

 

 

 

 

4.4

 

TMCC has outstanding certain long-term debt as set forth in Note 9 - Debt of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.  Not filed herein as an exhibit, pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is any instrument which defines the rights of holders of such long-term debt, where the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of TMCC and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  TMCC agrees to furnish copies of all such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

364 Day Credit Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2015, among Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (“TMCC”), Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V. (“TMFNL”), Toyota Financial Services (UK) PLC (“TFS(UK)”), Toyota Leasing GMBH (“TLG”), Toyota Credit de Puerto Rico Corp. (“TCPR”), Toyota Credit Canada Inc. (“TCCI”), Toyota Kreditbank GMBH (“TKG”) and Toyota Finance Australia Limited (“TFA”), as Borrowers, each lender party thereto, and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Agent and Swing Line Lender, BNP Paribas Securities Corp. (“BNPP Securities”), Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGMI”), Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“MLPFS”) and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. (“BTMU”), as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) and Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”), as Swing Line Lenders, and Citibank, Bank of America, and BTMU, as Syndication Agents.

 

(11)

(8)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 11, 2015, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(9)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September, 28, 2006, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(10)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 4, 2011, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(11)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2015, Commission File No. 1-9961.



EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

 

Method of

Filing

 

 

 

 

 

10.2

 

Three Year Credit Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2015, among TMCC, TMFNL, TFS(UK), TLG, TCPR, TCCI, TKG and TFA, as Borrowers, each lender party thereto, and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Agent and Swing Line Lender, BNPP Securities, CGMI, MLPFS, and BTMU, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, Citibank and Bank of America, as Swing Line Lenders, and Citibank, Bank of America, and BTMU, as Syndication Agents.

 

(12)

 

 

 

 

 

10.3

 

Five Year Credit Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2015, among TMCC, TMFNL, TFS(UK), TLG, TCPR, TCCI, TKG and TFA, as Borrowers, each lender party thereto, and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Agent and Swing Line Lender, BNPP Securities, CGMI, MLPFS, and BTMU, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, Citibank and Bank of America, as Swing Line Lenders, and Citibank, Bank of America, and BTMU, as Syndication Agents.

 

(13)

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

Credit Support Agreement dated July 14, 2000 between TFSC and TMC.

 

(14)

 

 

 

 

 

10.5

 

Credit Support Agreement dated October 1, 2000 between TMCC and TFSC.

 

(15)

 

 

 

 

 

10.6

 

Amended and Restated Repurchase Agreement dated effective as of October 1, 2000, between TMCC and TMS.  

 

(16)

 

 

 

 

 

10.7

 

Shared Services Agreement dated October 1, 2000 between TMCC and TMS.

 

(17)

 

 

 

 

 

10.8(a)

 

Credit Support Fee Agreement dated March 30, 2001 between TMCC and TFSC.

 

(18)

(12)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2015, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(13)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2015, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(14)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(15)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(16)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(17)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(18)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13(a) filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, Commission File No. 1-9961.


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

 

Method of

Filing

 

 

 

 

 

10.8(b)

 

Amendment No. 1 to Credit Support Fee Agreement dated June 17, 2005 between TMCC and TFSC.

 

(19)

 

 

 

 

 

10.8(c)

 

Amendment No. 2 dated as of September 7, 2012 to the Credit Support Fee Agreement dated as of March 30, 2001, as amended on June 17, 2005.

 

(20)

 

 

 

 

 

10.9

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement between TMCC and its directors and officers.

 

(21)

 

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

Calculation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

Furnished Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

Furnished Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

99.1

 

Consent Order pursuant to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, dated February 2, 2016, between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and the U.S. Department of Justice.

 

(22)

 

 

 

 

 

99.2

 

Consent Order pursuant to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, dated February 2, 2016, between Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, including the Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order, dated February 2, 2016, by Toyota Motor Credit Corporation.

 

(23)

 

 

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL instance document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL taxonomy extension calculation linkbase document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL taxonomy extension definition linkbase document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL taxonomy extension labels linkbase document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL taxonomy extension presentation linkbase document

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL taxonomy extension schema linkbase document

 

Filed Herewith

(19)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13(b) filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(20)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K date September 7, 2012, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(21)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with our Registration Statement on Form S-1, Commission File No. 33-22440.

(22)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 2, 2016, Commission File No. 1-9961.

(23)

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.3 filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 2, 2016, Commission File No. 1-9961.

143