(Exact name of Registrant as ~~Specified~~specified in ~~Its Charter)~~its charter)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the ~~Exchange~~ Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒ No☐

Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing share price of the registrant’s common stock on December 31, ~~2016 as reported on the NYSE American~~2018 was $148,429,519. Shares of common stock held by each current executive officer and director and by each person who is known by the registrant to own 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this computation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not a conclusive determination for other purposes.approximately $164 million.

As of ~~September 1, 2017, 49,085,951~~August 30, 2019, 49,669,091 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement for the ~~2017~~2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2019.

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning set forth in United States securities laws and regulations – that is, statements related to future, not past, events. In this context, forward-looking statements often address our expected future business, financial performance and financial condition, and often contain words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimates,” “expect,” “future,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “see,” “seek,” “strategy,” or “will” or the negative thereof or any variation thereon or similar terminology or expressions. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We have developed our forward-looking statements based on management’s beliefs and assumptions, which in turn rely upon information available to them at the time such statements were made. Such forward-looking statements reflect our current perspectives on our business, future performance, existing trends and information ~~as of~~from the date of this report. These include, but are not limited to, our beliefs about future revenue and expense levels, growth rates, prospects related to our strategic initiatives and business strategies, along with express or implied assumptions about, among other things: our continued relationships with our strategic operating partners; the performance of our historic business, as well as the businesses we have recently acquired, at levels consistent with recent trends and reflective of the synergies we believe will be available to us as a result of such acquisitions; our ability to successfully integrate our recently acquired businesses; our ability to locate suitable acquisition opportunities and secure the financing necessary to complete such acquisitions; the occurrence of no adverse developments affecting domestic and international economic, political or competitive conditions within our industry; transportation costs remaining in-line with recent levels and expected trends; our ability to mitigate, to the best extent possible, our dependence on current management and certain of our larger strategic operating partners; our compliance with financial and other covenants under our indebtedness; the absence of any adverse laws or governmental regulations affecting the transportation industry in general, and our operations in particular; and such other factors that may be identified from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings and other public announcements including those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part 1 Item 1A of this report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, as they speak only ~~as of~~from the date made. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. (the “Company”, “we” or “us”), operates as a third-party logistics company, providing multi-modal transportation and logistics services primarily to customers based in the United States and Canada. We service a large and diversified account base which we support from an extensive network of ~~over 100 operating~~ locations across North America as well as an integrated international service partner network located in other key markets around the globe. We provide these services through a multi-brand network which includes over 100 locations operated exclusively on our behalf by independent agents, who we also refer to as our “strategic operating partners”, as well as approximately 20 Company-owned offices. As a third-party logistics company, we have approximately 10,000 asset-based transportation companies, including motor carriers, railroads, airlines and ocean lines in our carrier network. We believe shippers value our services because we are able to objectively arrange the most efficient and cost-effective means, type and provider of transportation service without undue influence caused by the ownership of transportation assets. In addition, our minimal investment in physical assets affords us the opportunity for a higher return on invested capital and net cash flows than our asset-based competitors.

Through our operating locations across North America, we offer domestic and international air and ocean freight forwarding services and freight brokerage services including truckload services, less than truckload (“LTL”) services, and intermodal services, which is the movement of freight in trailers or containers by combination of truck and rail. Our primary business operations involve arranging the shipment, on behalf of our customers, of materials, products, equipment and other goods that are generally larger than shipments handled by integrated carriers of primarily small parcels, such as FedEx, DHL and UPS. Our services include arranging and monitoring all aspects of material flow activity utilizing advanced information technology systems. We also provide other value-added ~~logistics~~supply chain services, including ~~customs brokerage,~~ order fulfillment, inventory management, warehouse and ~~warehouse~~distribution services (collectively, “Materials Management and Distribution” or “MM&D” services), and customs brokerage services to complement our core transportation service offering.

We expect to grow our business organically and by completing acquisitions of other companies with complementary geographical and logistics service offerings. Our organic growth strategy will continue to focus on strengthening existing and expanding new customer relationships leveraging the benefit of our truck brokerage and intermodal service offerings, while continuing our efforts on the organic build-out of our network of strategic operating partner locations. In addition, as we continue to grow and scale the business, we believe that we are creating density in our trade lanes which creates opportunities for us to more efficiently source and manage our transportation capacity. In addition to our focus on organic growth, we will continue to search for acquisition candidates that bring critical mass from a geographic and purchasing power standpoint along with providing complementary service offerings to the current platform. As we continue to grow and scale the business, we also remain focused on leveraging our back-office infrastructure and technology systems to drive productivity improvement across the organization.

As a non-asset based third-party logistics provider, we believe that we are well-positioned to provide cost-effective and efficient solutions to address the demand in the marketplace for transportation and logistics services. We believe that the most important competitive factors in our industry are quality of service, including reliability, responsiveness, expertise and convenience, scope of operations, geographic coverage, information technology and price. We believe our primary competitive advantages are as follows:

As a non-asset based logistics provider, we own only a minimal amount of equipment. By not owning the transportation equipment used to transport the freight, which results in relatively minimal fixed operating costs, we are able to leverage our network of locations to offer competitive pricing and flexible solutions to our customers. Moreover, our balanced product offering provides us with revenue streams from multiple sources and enables us to retain customers even as they shift across various modes of transportation. We believe our low capital intensity model allows us to provide low-cost solutions to our customers, operate our business with strong cash flow characteristics, and retain significant flexibility in responding to changing industries and economic conditions.

Our current network is predominantly represented by independent agents, who operate exclusively on our behalf, who we also refer to as our “strategic operating partners”, who rely on us for operating authority, technology, sales and marketing support, access to working capital, our carrier and international partner networks, and collective purchasing power. Through this collaboration, our strategic operating partners have the ability to focus on the operational and sales support aspects of their business without diverting costs or expertise to the structural aspect of their operations, thus, providing our strategic operating partners with the regional, national and global brand recognition that they would not otherwise be able to achieve acting alone.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue pursuant to agreements with our strategic operating partners operating under our various brands. These arrangements afford us with a relatively low risk growth model as each strategic operating partner is responsible for its own sales and costs of operations. Under shared economic arrangements, we are responsible to provide to our strategic operating partners centralized back-office infrastructure, transportation and accounting systems, billing and collection services.

We service a large and diversified account base of over 12,000 accounts consisting of consumer goods, food and beverage, manufacturing and retail customers. ~~As of~~From the date of this report, no single customer and no strategic operating partner represented more than 5%10% of our consolidated net revenues, reducing risks associated with any particular industry, geographic or customer concentration.

A primary component of our business strategy is the continued development of advanced information systems to provide accurate and timely information to our management, strategic operating partners and customers. We believe that the ability to provide accurate real-time information on the status of shipments has and will become increasingly important in our industry. Our customer delivery tools enable connectivity with our customers’ and trading partners’ systems, which leads to more accurate and up-to-date information on the status of shipments. Our centralized transportation management system (rating, routing, tender and financial settlement process) drives significant efficiency across our network.

We provide worldwide supply chain services, which include international air and ocean services that complement our domestic service offerings. Our offerings include heavyweight and small package air services, providing same day (next flight out) air charters, next day a.m./p.m., second day a.m./p.m. as well as time definite surface transport moves. Our non-asset based business model allows us to use commercial passenger and cargo flights. Thus, we have thousands of daily flight options to choose from, and our pickup and delivery network provides us with zip code to zip code coverage throughout North America.

As we continue to grow and scale the business, we believe that we are developing density in our trade lanes which creates opportunities for us to more efficiently source and manage our transportation capacity. With our acquisition of Wheels Group, Inc. in 2015, our network ~~now~~ has access to truck brokerage and intermodal capabilities. We believe the benefit of our relative purchasing power along with our ~~recent~~ service line expansion will serve as a competitive differentiator in the marketplace to help us secure new customers and attract additional strategic operating partners to our network.

In addition to our core transportation service offerings, we also provide value-added supply chain services including ~~customs brokerage,~~ order fulfillment, inventory management, MM&D, and ~~warehouse and distribution~~customs brokerage services. We believe that our value-added services allow us to leverage our transportation services ~~in order~~ to generate additional revenue and provide additional convenience to our customers.

The logistics industry is highly fragmented with thousands of companies of various sizes competing in the domestic and international markets. As business requirements for efficient and cost-effective logistics services have increased, so has the importance and complexity of effectively managing freight transportation. Businesses increasingly strive to minimize inventory levels, perform manufacturing and assembly operations in the lowest cost locations, and distribute their products in numerous global markets. As a result, companies are increasingly looking to third-party logistics providers to help them execute their supply chain strategies.

Shippers typically manage their supply chains using some combination of asset and non-asset based service providers. We operate principally as a non-asset based third-party logistics provider focused on freight forwarding, truck brokerage and intermodal transportation services along with associated value-added services. According to Armstrong and Associates, the market for third-party logistics services in the United States and Canada is estimated at approximately ~~$175.5~~$199.6 billion.

Because non-asset based companies select from various transportation options in routing customer shipments, they are often able to serve customers less expensively and with greater flexibility than their asset based competitors, who are typically focused on maximizing the utilization of their own captive fleets of trucks, aircraft and ships rather than the specific needs of the customer.

We believe there are several factors that are increasing demand for global logistics solutions. These factors include:

Our objective is to provide customers with comprehensive multi-modal transportation and logistics solutions offered by us through our Radiant®, Wheels™, Airgroup®, Adcom®, DBA™ and Service Byby Air™ brands. Since inception of our business in 2006, we have executed a strategy to expand operations through a combination of organic growth and the strategic acquisition of non-asset based transportation and logistics providers meeting our acquisition criteria. We have successfully completed 1718 acquisitions since our initial acquisition of Airgroup in January of 2006, including:

We expect to grow our business organically and by completing acquisitions of other companies with complementary geographical and logistics service offerings. We will continue to make enhancements to our back-office infrastructure, transportation management, and accounting systems to support this growth. Our organic growth strategy will continue to focus on strengthening existing and expanding new customer relationships, while continuing our efforts on the organic build-out of our network of strategic operating partner locations. In addition, we will also be working to drive further productivity improvements enabled through our value-added truck brokerage and customs house brokerage service capabilities.

Our acquisition strategy has been designed to take advantage of shifting market dynamics. The third-party logistics industry continues to grow as an increasing number of businesses outsource their logistics functions to more cost effectively manage and extract value from their supply chains. The industry is positioned for further consolidation as it remains highly fragmented, and as customers are demanding the types of sophisticated and broad reaching service offerings that can more effectively be handled by larger more diverse organizations. We believe the highly fragmented composition of the marketplace, the industry participants’ need for capital, and their owners’ desire for liquidity has and will continue to produce a large number of attractive acquisition candidates. For the most part, our target acquisition candidates are generally smaller than those identified as acquisition targets of larger public companies and have limited ability to conduct their own public offerings or obtain financing that will provide them with capital for liquidity or rapid growth. We believe that many of these “smaller” companies are receptive to our acquisition program as a vehicle for liquidation or growth. We intend to be opportunistic in executing our acquisition strategy with a goal of expanding both our domestic and international capabilities.

Leverage the People, Process and Technology Available through a Central Platform. A key element of our operating strategy is to maximize our operational efficiencies by integrating general and administrative functions into our back-office operations and reducing or eliminating redundant functions and facilities at acquired companies. This is designed to enable us to quickly realize potential savings and synergies, efficiently control and monitor operations of acquired companies, and allow acquired companies to focus on growing their sales and operations.

Develop and Maintain Strong Customer Relationships. We seek to develop and maintain strong interactive customer relationships by anticipating and focusing on our customers’ needs. We emphasize a relationship-oriented approach to business, rather than the transaction or assignment-oriented approach used by many of our competitors. To develop close customer relationships, we and our network of operating partners regularly meet with both existing and prospective customers to help design solutions for, and identify the resources needed to execute, their supply chain strategies. We believe that this relationship-oriented approach results in greater customer satisfaction and reduced business development expense.

Through our operating locations across North America, we offer domestic and international air and ocean freight forwarding services and freight brokerage services including truckload services, LTL services, and intermodal services, which is the movement of freight in trailers or containers by combination of truck and rail. As a third-party logistics provider, our primary business operations involve arranging the shipment, on behalf of our customers, of materials, products, equipment and other goods that are generally larger than shipments handled by integrated carriers of primarily small parcels, such as FedEx, DHL and UPS, including arranging and monitoring all aspects of material flow activity utilizing advanced information technology systems. We also provide other value-added ~~logistics~~supply chain services, including ~~customs brokerage,~~ order fulfillment, inventory management, warehousing and ~~warehousing~~distribution services (“MM&D”), and customs brokerage services, to complement our core transportation service offering.

As a non-asset based provider we generally do not own the transportation equipment used to transport the freight. We generally expect to neither own nor operate any material transportation assets and, consequently, arrange for transportation of our customers’ shipments via trucking companies, commercial airlines, air cargo carriers, railroads, ocean carriers and other non-asset based third-party providers. We select the carrier for a shipment based on route, departure time, available cargo capacity and cost. We may charter cargo aircraft and/or ocean ~~vessel’s~~vessels from time to time depending upon seasonality, freight volumes and other factors. We generate our gross margin on the difference between what we charge to our customers for the services provided to them, and what we pay to the transportation providers to transport the freight.

We are organized functionally in two geographic operating segments: U.S. and Canada. Our transportation services for both the U.S. and Canada segments can be broadly placed into the categories of freight forwarding and freight brokerage services:

Freight forwarding. As a freight forwarder, we operate as a non-asset based carrier providing domestic and international air and ocean freight forwarding services. Our freight forwarding operations involve obtaining shipment or material orders from customers, creating and delivering a wide range of logistics solutions to meet customers' specific requirements for transportation and related services, and arranging and monitoring all aspects of material flow activity utilizing advanced information technology systems. We arrange for transportation of our customers’ shipments via trucking companies, commercial airlines, air cargo carriers, ocean carriers and other asset and non-asset based third-party providers. We select the carrier for a shipment based on route, departure time, available cargo capacity and cost. We charter cargo aircraft from time to time depending upon seasonality, freight volumes and other factors.

Freight brokerage. We also provide significant bi-modal brokerage capabilities providing truck load, LTL and intermodal services throughout the United States and Canada, which is managed through our centralized service centers in Chicago, Illinois and Toronto, Ontario. We offer temperature-controlled, dry van, intermodal drayage, and flatbed services and specialize in the transport of food and beverage, consumer packaged goods and frozen food and refrigerated products.

As a truck broker, we match the customers’ needs with carriers’ capacity to provide the most effective combination of service and price. We have contracts with a substantial number of carriers allowing us to meet the varied needs of our customers. As part of the truck brokerage services, we negotiate rates, track shipments in transit and handle claims for freight loss and damage on behalf of our customers. For our LTL service, we employ a point-to-point model that we believe serves as a competitive advantage over the traditional hub and spoke LTL model in terms of faster transit times, lower incidence of damage, and reduced fuel consumption.

As an intermodal services company, we arrange for the movement of our customers’ freight in containers, trailers and rail boxcars, typically over long distances of at least 750 miles. We contract with railroads to provide transportation for the long-haul portion of the shipment and with local trucking companies, known as “drayage companies,” for pickup and delivery. As part of our intermodal services, we negotiate rail and drayage rates, electronically track shipments in transit, consolidate billing and handle claims for freight loss or damage on behalf of our customers.

To complement our core transportation service offerings, we also provide a number of value-added services, including customs brokerage and ~~materials management and distribution~~MM&D solutions.

The ~~regular~~continued enhancement of our information systems and ultimate migration of acquired companies and additional strategic operating partners to a common set of ~~back-office~~customer-facing and ~~customer facing~~back-office applications is a key component of our growth strategy. We believe that the ability to provide accurate real-time information on the status of shipments as well as enhanced reporting and visibility tools has become increasingly important and that our efforts in this area will result in competitive service advantages. In addition, we believe that centralizing our operations into a single transportation management system (rating, routing, tender and financial settlement processes) will continue to drive significant productivity improvement across our network.

In our forwarding operations, we use ~~a web-enabled~~ third-party transportation management system (Cargowise) and are migrating operations to SAP TM, that isare integrated to our third-party accounting system (SAP). These systems combine to form the foundation of our supply-chain technologies, which ~~we call “Globalvision”, and which~~ provides us with a common set of back-office operating, accounting and customer facing ~~applications used across our network.~~applications. In our brokerage operations, we utilize ~~Wheels’~~the TEDS system for transportation management and Megatrans for intermodal services. In our warehousing operations, we use Microsoft’s ~~Navision.~~Navision and are migrating to Highjump, which uses SAP for order management services. These systems are connected to Epicor and JD Edwards for accounting and financial reporting. All brokerage systems are integrated with ~~“Wheelslink”,~~ our online customer facing ~~application providing information and reporting across all services.~~applications. We ~~are~~continue to make gradual progress in ~~the initial stages of~~ migrating these various operating and financial reporting systems to a singular SAP-based platform. We are taking a phased approach to these migrations and are currently working to transition our domestic and international freight forwarding services to our new SAP-based transportation management system. Future phases will include the transition of our international freight forwarding services and our legacy brokerage transportation management and financial reporting systems to SAP.

We principally market our services through our network of Company-owned and strategic operating partner locations across North America. Each office is staffed with operational employees to provide support for the sales team, develop frequent contact with the customer’s traffic department, and maintain customer service. Our current network is predominantly represented by strategic operating partners that rely on us for operating authority, technology, sales and marketing support, access to working capital, our carrier and international partners networks, and collective purchasing power. Through this collaboration, our strategic operating partners have the ability to focus on the operational and sales support aspects of the business without diverting costs or expertise to the structural aspect of their operations, providing our partners with the regional, national and global brand recognition that they would not otherwise be able to achieve by solely serving their local market. We have no customers or strategic operating partners that separately account for more than 5%10% of our consolidated net revenues, although we do have a number of significant customers and strategic operating partner locations with volume and stature, the loss of one or more of which could negatively impact our ability to retain and service our customers.

~~During the past three years, we have not spent any material amount on research and development activities.~~

The logistics business is directly impacted by the volume of domestic and international trade. The volume of such trade is influenced by many factors, including economic and political conditions in the United States and abroad, major work stoppages, currency fluctuations, acts of war, terrorism and other armed conflicts, United States and international laws relating to tariffs, trade restrictions, foreign investments and taxation.

The global transportation and logistics services industry is intensively competitive and is expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. We will compete against asset based and other non-asset based third-party logistics companies, consultants, information technology vendors and shippers’ transportation departments. This competition is based primarily on rates, quality of service (such as damage-free shipments, on-time delivery and consistent transit times), reliable pickup and delivery and scope of operations. Certain of our competitors have substantially greater financial resources than we do. However, we believe the incremental service offerings enabled through our acquisition strategy (e.g. Wheels’ truck brokerage and intermodal capabilities) will serve as a catalyst for margin expansion in our existing business and a competitive differentiator in the marketplace to help us secure new customers and attract additional strategic operating partners to our network.

We have two geographic operating segments: United States and Canada. Further information regarding our geographic operating segments may be found in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K under the subheading “Results of Operations,” and in the “Notes to the consolidated financial statements” in Note 13, “Operating and Geographic Segment Information.”

Interstate and international transportation of freight is highly regulated. Failure to comply with applicable state and federal regulations, or to maintain required permits or licenses, can result in substantial fines or revocation of operating permits or authorities imposed on both transportation intermediaries and their shipper customers. We cannot give assurance as to the degree or cost of future regulations on our business. Some of the regulations affecting our current and prospective operations are described below.

Air freight forwarding operations are subject to regulation, as an indirect air cargo carrier, under the Federal Aviation Act as enforced by the Federal Aviation Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Transportation Security Administration of the Department of Homeland Security. While air freight forwarders are exempted from most of the Federal Aviation Act’s requirements by the Economic Aviation Regulations, the industry is subject to ongoing regulatory and legislative developments that can impact the economics of the industry by requiring changes to operating practices or influencing the demand for, and the costs of, providing services to customers.

Surface freight forwarding operations are subject to various state and federal statutes, and are regulated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation and, to a very limited extent, the Surface Transportation Board. These federal agencies have broad investigatory and regulatory powers, including the power to issue a certificate of authority or license to engage in the business, to approve specified mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, and to regulate the delivery of some types of domestic shipments and operations within particular geographic areas.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration also has the authority to regulate interstate motor carrier operations, including the regulation of certain rates, charges and accounting systems, to require periodic financial reporting, and to regulate insurance, driver qualifications, operation of motor vehicles, parts and accessories for motor vehicle equipment, hours of service of drivers, inspection, repair, maintenance standards and other safety related matters. The federal laws governing interstate motor carriers have both direct and indirect application to the Company. The breadth and scope of the federal regulations may affect our operations and the motor carriers that are used in the provisioning of the transportation services. In certain locations, state or local permits or registrations may also be required to provide or obtain intrastate motor carrier services.

The Federal Maritime Commission, or FMC, regulates and licenses ocean forwarding operations. Non-vessel operating common carriers are subject to FMC regulation, under the FMC tariff filing and surety bond requirements, and under the Shipping Act of 1984, particularly those terms proscribing rebating practices.

United States customs brokerage operations are subject to the licensing requirements of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security. ~~As we broaden our capabilities to include customs brokerage operations, we will be subject to regulation by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection.~~ Likewise, any customs brokerage operations must also be licensed in and subject to the regulations of countries into which freight is imported.

As of ~~the date of this report,~~June 30, 2019, we have ~~758~~708 employees, of which ~~714~~675 are full time. None of these employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We have experienced no work stoppages and consider our relations with our employees to be good.

We maintain a website at www.radiantdelivers.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, nor incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We post on our website, free of charge, documents that we file with or furnish to the SEC, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and proxy statements, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the SEC. These reports are also available free of charge on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below as well as the other information contained in or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K before investing in our common stock. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such a case, you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks described below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or those we currently view to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The future trading price of shares of our common stock will be affected by the performance of our business relative to, among other things, competition, market conditions and general economic and industry conditions.

We need to maintain and expand our existing strategic operating partner network to increase revenues.

We sell our services through Company-owned locations operating under the Radiant and Wheels brands and through a network of independently-owned strategic operating partners throughout North America operating under the Airgroup, Adcom, DBA and Service by Air brands. For the years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, approximately ~~62%~~56% and 59% of our consolidated net revenues were derived through our strategic operating partners. We believe our strategic operating partners will remain a critical component to our success for the foreseeable future. Although the terms of our strategic operating partner agreements vary widely, they generally cover the manner and amount of payments, the services to be performed, the length of the contract, and provide us with certain protections such as strategic operating partner-funded reserves ~~and~~against potential bad debts, indemnification obligations, and in certain instances include a personal guaranty of the independent ~~owner.~~owner(s) of the strategic operating partners. Additionally, certain of our strategic operating partner agreements may impose restrictions on us, including our ability to provide services in certain territories or to certain customers and our ability to hire employees of our strategic operating partners. Certain of our strategic operating partner agreements are for defined terms, while others are subject to “evergreen” terms, or contain automatic renewal provisions or are at-will on a month-to-month basis. Regardless of stated term, in most situations the agreements can be terminated by the strategic operating partner with prior notice. As certain agreements expire, there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into new agreements that provide for the same terms and economics as those previously agreed upon, if at all. Thus, we are subject to the risk of strategic operating partner terminations and the failure or refusal of certain of our strategic operating partners to renew their existing agreements. This risk is often accentuated upon the acquisition of a new agency-based ~~network as, for example, we experienced the loss of certain strategic operating partners when we acquired DBA in 2011 and SBA in 2015.~~network. We have a number of customers and strategic operating partner locations with significant volume and stature, ~~although with the benefit of our recent acquisitions,~~however, no single customer or strategic operating partner location represents more than 5%10% of our consolidated net revenues. We cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain and expand our existing strategic operating partner relationships or enter into new strategic operating partner relationships, or that new or renewed strategic operating partner relationships will be available on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to maintain and expand our existing strategic operating partner relationships, renew existing

strategic operating partner relationships, or enter into new strategic operating partner relationships, we may lose customers, customer introductions and co-marketing benefits, and our operating results may be negatively impacted. We may also be restricted from growing in certain territories or with certain customers, except through our strategic operating partners.

If our strategic operating partners fail to maintain adequate reserves against unpaid customer invoices, or if we are unable to offset against commissions earned and payable by us to our strategic operating partners for unpaid customer invoices, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue pursuant to agreements with strategic operating partners operating under our various brands. Under these agreements, each individual strategic operating partner is responsible for some or all of the ~~bad debt expense related to the underlying~~collection of amounts due from customers being serviced by such strategic operating partner. Certain of our strategic operating partners are required to maintain a security deposit with us ~~that is recognized as a liability in our financial statements and~~to be used ~~as a bad debt reserve for each strategic operating partner.~~to fund those customer accounts ultimately not collected by us. We charge each of the strategic operating ~~partners’ bad debt reserve accounts~~partners for any accounts receivable aged beyond 90 days. ~~The bad debt reserve account may carry a deficit balance when amounts charged to this reserve exceed amounts otherwise available in~~If the ~~bad debt reserve account. In these circumstances, deficit bad debt reserve accounts as well as other deficit balances~~strategic operating partner’s deposit with us has been depleted, an amount will be owed to us by our strategic operating ~~partners are recognized as a receivable in our financial statements. Other~~partner. Based on legacy contracts assumed upon acquisition, some strategic operating partners are not required to ~~establish~~maintain a ~~bad debt reserve,~~security deposit, however, they are still responsible for deficits and their strategic operating partner agreements provide that we may withhold all or a portion of future ~~commission checks~~commissions payable to the strategic operating partner in satisfaction of any ~~deficit balance.~~deficit. As of June 30, ~~2017, a number of~~2019, approximately $2.4 million was owed to us by our strategic operating partners, ~~had~~of which, $1.4 million was owed to us by our former British Columbia operating partner and from whom we have secured a ~~deficit~~Judgment of Confession and are in the process of collection proceedings. The unpaid amounts represented by the Judgement of Confession are included in accounts receivable in the condensed consolidated balance ~~in their bad debt reserve account totaling~~sheet as of June 30, 2019, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately ~~$3.2 million. To~~$700. However, to the extent any of these strategic operating partners cease operations or are otherwise unable to replenish these deficit accounts, ~~or repay the deficit balances,~~ we would be at risk of loss for any such amount. We include such amounts in the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is probable the amounts owed will not be collected.

Failure to comply with obligations as an “indirect air carrier” could result in penalties and fines and limit our ability to ship freight.

We are regulated, among other things, as “indirect air carriers” by the Transportation Security Administration of the Department of Homeland Security. These agencies provide requirements, guidance and, in some cases, administer licensing requirements and processes applicable to the freight forwarding industry. We monitor our compliance and the compliance of our subsidiaries with such agency requirements. We rely on our strategic operating partners to monitor their own compliance, except when we are notified of a violation, when we may become involved. Failure to comply with these requirements, policies and procedures could result in penalties and fines. To date, a limited number of our strategic operating partners have been out of compliance with the “indirect air carrier” regulations, resulting in fines to us, which we attempt to collect from the strategic operating partners. There is no assurance that additional violations will not take place, which could result in penalties or fines or, in the extreme case, limits on our ability to ship freight.

Our business will be seriously harmed if we fail to develop, implement, maintain, upgrade, enhance, protect and integrate information technology systems.

We rely heavily on our information technology systems to efficiently run our business, and they are a key component of our growth strategy. To keep pace with changing technologies and customer demands, we must correctly interpret and address market trends and enhance the features and functionality of our technology platform in response to these trends, which may lead to significant ongoing software development or licensing costs. We may be unable to accurately determine the needs of our customers and strategic operating partners and the trends in the transportation services industry, or to design or license and implement the appropriate features and functionality of our technology platform in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could result in decreased demand for our services and a corresponding decrease in our revenues. Despite testing, external and internal risks, such as malware, insecure coding, “Acts of God,” data leakage and human error pose a direct threat to our information technology systems and operations. We may also be subject to cybersecurity attacks and other intentional hacking. Any failure to identify and address such defects or errors or prevent a cyber-attack could result in service interruptions, operational difficulties, loss of revenues or market share, liability to customers or others, diversion of resources, injury to our reputation and increased service and maintenance costs. Addressing such issues could prove to be impossible or very costly and responding to resulting claims or liability could similarly involve substantial cost. We must maintain and enhance the reliability and speed of our information technology systems to remain competitive and effectively handle higher volumes of freight through our network and the various service modes we offer. If our information technology systems are unable to manage additional volume for our operations as our business grows, or if such systems are not suited to manage the various service modes we offer or businesses we acquire, our service levels and operating efficiency could decline. We expect customers and strategic operating partners to continue to demand more sophisticated, fully integrated information systems from their supply chain services providers. If we fail to hire and retain qualified personnel to implement, protect and maintain our information technology systems or if we fail to upgrade our systems to meet our customers’ and strategic operating partners’ demands, our business and results of operations could be seriously harmed. This could result in a loss of customers or a decline in the volume of freight we receive from customers.

In addition, acquired companies will need to be integrated with our information technology systems, which may cause additional training or licensing cost, along with potential delays and disruption. In such event, our revenue, financial results and ability to operate profitably could be negatively impacted. The challenges associated with integration of our acquisitions may increase these risks.

Our management information and financial reporting systems are spread across diverse platforms and geographies.

The growth of our business through acquisitions has resulted in our reliance on the accounting, business information, and other computer systems of these acquired entities to capture and transmit information concerning customer orders, carrier payment, payroll, and other critical business data. We ~~are in the initial stages of~~continue to make progress towards migrating our various legacy operating and accounting systems to a new singular SAP-based system. As long as an acquired business remains on another information technology system, we face additional manual calculations, training costs, delays, and an increased possibility of inaccuracies in the data we use to manage our business and report our financial results. Any delay in compiling, assessing, and reporting information could adversely impact our business, our ability to timely react to changes in volumes, prices, or other trends, or to take actions to comply with financial covenants, all of which could negatively impact our stock price.

We rely on commercial airfreight carriers and air charter operators, ocean freight carriers, trucking companies, major U.S. railroads, other transportation companies, draymen and longshoremen for the movement of our customers’ cargo. Consequently, our ability to provide services for our customers could be adversely impacted by, among other things: shortages in available cargo capacity; changes by carriers and transportation companies in policies and practices such as scheduling, pricing, payment terms and frequency of service, increases in the cost of fuel, taxes and labor, changes in the financial stability or operating capabilities of carriers, and other

factors not within our control. Reductions in airfreight or ocean freight capacity could negatively impact our yields. Material interruptions in service or stoppages in transportation, whether caused by strike, work stoppage, lock-out, slowdown or otherwise, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, any determination that our third-party carriers have violated laws and regulations could seriously damage our reputation and brands, resulting in diminished revenue and profit and increased operating costs.

Our profitability depends on our ability to effectively manage our cost structure as we grow the business.

We have increased, and intend to further increase, our revenue through organic growth, adding strategic operating partners, and acquisitions. We believe that certain of our costs, such as those related to information technology, physical locations, senior management, and sales and general operations, and excluding non-cash amortization, should grow more slowly than our net revenue, which would lead to improved cash flow margins over time. Historically, our cash flow margins have fluctuated, and have not always improved as we have grown. To the extent we fail to manage our costs, including purchased transportation, strategic operating partner commissions, personnel expenses, and sales and general expenses, our profitability may not improve or may decrease. This could adversely impact our business, results of operation, financial condition, and the trading price of our common stock.

Historically, our operating results have been subject to seasonal trends when measured on a quarterly basis. Our first and fourth fiscal quarters are traditionally weaker compared with our second and third fiscal quarters. As a result, our quarterly operating results are likely to continue to fluctuate. This trend is dependent on numerous factors, including the markets in which we operate, holiday seasons, climate, economic conditions and numerous other factors. A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from customers in industries whose shipping patterns are tied closely to consumer demand which can sometimes be difficult to predict or are based on just-in-time production schedules. Therefore, our revenue is, to a large degree, affected by factors that are outside of our control. There can be no assurance that our historic operating patterns will continue in future periods as we cannot influence or forecast many of these factors.

Comparisons of our operating results from period to period are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indicator of future performance.

Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and likely will continue to fluctuate in the future because of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from customers in industries whose shipping patterns are tied closely to economic trends and consumer demand that can be difficult to predict, or are based on just-in-time production schedules. Because our quarterly revenues and operating results vary significantly, comparisons of our results from period to period are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indicator of future performance. Additionally, the timing of acquisitions, as well as the revenue and expenses of the acquired operations, the transaction expenses, amortization of ~~intangibles,~~intangible assets, and interest expense associated with acquisitions can make our operating results from period to period difficult to compare. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our historical operating patterns will continue in future periods or that comparisons to prior periods will be meaningful.

Economic recessions and other factors that reduce freight volumes could have a material adverse impact on our business.

The transportation industry historically has experienced cyclical fluctuations in financial results due to economic recession, downturns in business cycles of our customers, interest rate fluctuations and other economic factors beyond our control. Deterioration in the economic environment subjects our business to various risks that may have a material impact on our operating results and cause us to not reach our long-term growth goals, and which may include the following:

Carriers can be expected to charge higher prices if market conditions warrant, or to cover higher operating expenses. Our net revenues and income from operations may decrease if we are unable to increase our pricing to our customers. Increased demand for truckload services and pending changes in regulations may reduce available capacity and increase carrier pricing.

We face intense competition in the freight forwarding, freight brokerage, logistics and supply chain management industry.

The freight forwarding, freight brokerage, logistics and supply chain management industry is intensely competitive and is expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. We face competition from a number of companies, including many that have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources. Customers increasingly are turning to competitive bidding processes, in which they solicit bids from a number of competitors, including competitors that are larger than us. Increased competition may lead to revenue reductions, reduced profit margins, or a loss of market share, any one of which could harm our business. There are many factors that could impair our profitability, including the following:

Our industry is consolidating and if we cannot gain sufficient market presence, we may not be able to compete successfully against larger companies in our industry.

There currently is a trend within our industry towards consolidation of the niche players into larger companies that are attempting to increase global operations through the acquisition of regional and local freight forwarders, brokers, and other freight logistics providers. If we cannot gain sufficient market presence or otherwise establish a successful strategy in our industry, we may not be able to compete successfully against larger companies in our industry.

If we are not able to limit our liability for customers’ claims for loss or damage to their goods through contract terms and limit our exposure through the purchase of insurance, we could be required to pay large amounts to our customers as compensation for their claims and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

In our freight forwarding operations, we have liability under law to our customers for loss or damage to their goods. We attempt to limit our exposure through release limits, indemnification by the air, ocean, and ground carriers that transport the freight, and insurance. Moreover, because a freight forwarder relationship to an airline or ocean carrier is that of a shipper to a carrier, the airline or ocean carrier generally assumes the same responsibility to us as we assume to our customers. When we act in the capacity of an authorized agent for an air or ocean carrier, the carrier, rather than us, assumes liability for the safe delivery of the customer’s cargo to its ultimate destination, unless due to our own errors and omissions. However, these efforts may prove unsuccessful and we may be liable for loss and damage to the goods.

In addition to legal liability, from time to time customers exert economic pressure when the underlying carrier fails to cover the costs of loss or damage. We have, from time to time, made payments to our customers for claims related to our services and may make such payments in the future. Should we experience an increase in the number or size of such claims or an increase in liability pursuant to claims or unfavorable resolutions of claims, our results could be adversely affected.

There can be no assurance that our insurance coverage will provide us with adequate coverage for such claims or that the maximum amounts for which we are liable in connection with our services will not change in the future or exceed our insurance levels. As with every insurance policy, there are limits, exclusions and deductibles that apply, and we could be subject to claims for which insurance coverage may be inadequate or even disputed and such claims could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, significant increases in insurance costs could reduce our profitability.

We may be subject to claims arising from transportation of freight by the carriers with which we contract.

We use the services of thousands of transportation companies in connection with our transportation operations. From time to time, the drivers employed and engaged by the carriers we contract with are involved in accidents which may result in death or serious personal injuries. The resulting types and/or amounts of damages may be excluded from or exceed the amount of insurance coverage maintained by the contracted carrier. Although these drivers are not our employees and all of these drivers are employees, owner-operators, or independent contractors working for carriers, from time to time, claims may be asserted against us for their actions, or for our actions in retaining them. Claims against us may exceed the amount of our insurance coverage or may not be covered by insurance at all. A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, liability claims or workers’ compensation claims, or unfavorable resolutions of claims could materially and adversely affect our operating results. In addition, significant increases in insurance costs or the inability to purchase insurance as a result of these claims could reduce our profitability. Our involvement in the transportation of certain goods, including but not limited to hazardous materials, could also increase our exposure in the event one of our contracted carriers is involved in an accident resulting in injuries or contamination.

We are subject to various claims and lawsuits that could result in significant expenditures.

Our business exposes us to claims and litigation related to damage to cargo, labor and employment practices (including wage-and-hour, employment classification of independent contractor drivers, sales representatives, brokerage agents and other individuals, and other federal and state claims), personal injury, property damage, business practices, environmental liability and other matters. We carry insurance to cover most exposures, subject to specific coverage exceptions, aggregate limits, and self-insured retentions that we negotiate from time to time. However, not all claims are covered, and there can be no assurance that our coverage limits will be adequate to cover all amounts in dispute. For example, we are currently defending an employment-based claim with a wage and hour component that would not be covered by our insurance (description included in this report). ~~Based on the early stages of both of these proceedings, we~~We are unable to determine the likelihood of a successful defense or the ultimate amount of any damages that would be awarded. To the extent we experience claims that are uninsured, exceed our coverage limits, or involve significant aggregate use of our self-insured retention amounts, the expenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, particularly in the quarter in which the amounts are accrued. In addition, in the future, we may be subject to higher insurance premiums or increase our self-insured retention amounts, which could increase our overall costs or the volatility of claims expense.

Our failure to comply with, or the costs of complying with, government regulation could negatively affect our results of operation.

Our business is subject to evolving, complex and increasing regulation by national and international sources. Regulatory changes could affect the economics of our industry by requiring changes in operating practices or influencing the demand for, and the costs of providing, services to customers. Future regulation and our failure to comply with any applicable regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we are unable to maintain our brand images and corporate reputation, our business may suffer.

Our success depends in part on our ability to maintain the image of the Radiant, Wheels, Airgroup, Adcom, DBA and Service Byby Air brands and our reputation for providing excellent service to our customers. Service quality issues, actual or perceived, even when false or unfounded, could tarnish the image of our brand and may cause customers to use other freight-forwarding companies. Damage to our reputation and loss of brand equity could reduce demand for our services and thus have an adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations, and could require additional resources to rebuild our reputation and restore the value of our brands.

Issues related to the intellectual property rights on which our business depends, whether related to our failure to enforce our own rights or infringement claims brought by others, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We use both internally developed and purchased technology in conducting our business. Whether internally developed or purchased, it is possible that the user of these technologies could be claimed to infringe upon or violate the intellectual property rights of third-parties. In the event that a claim is made against us by a third-party for the infringement of intellectual property rights, any settlement

or adverse judgment against us either in the form of increased costs of licensing or a cease and desist order in using the technology could have an adverse effect on us and our results of operations.

We also rely on a combination of intellectual property rights, including copyrights, trademarks, domain names, trade secrets, intellectual property licenses and other contractual rights, to establish and protect our intellectual property and technology. Any of our owned or licensed intellectual property rights could be challenged, invalidated, circumvented, infringed or misappropriated; our trade secrets and other confidential information could be disclosed in an unauthorized manner to third-parties or we may fail to secure the rights to intellectual property developed by our employees, contractors and others. Given our international operations, we seek to register our trademarks and other intellectual property domestically and internationally. The laws of certain foreign countries may not protect trademarks to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be time consuming and costly, distract management’s attention and resources and ultimately be unsuccessful. Moreover, our failure to develop and properly manage new intellectual property could adversely affect our market positions and business opportunities.

Our failure to obtain, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights could therefore have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We intend to grow rapidly and substantially, including by expanding our internal resources, by making acquisitions and entering into new markets. We may experience difficulties and higher-than-expected expenses in executing this strategy as a result of unfamiliarity with new markets, and change in revenue and business models.

Our growth will place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources. We will need to continually improve existing procedures and controls as well as implement new transaction processing, operational and financial systems, and procedures and controls to expand, train and manage our employee base. Our working capital needs will increase substantially as our operations grow. Failure to manage growth effectively, or obtain necessary working capital, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, stock price and financial condition.

Our loans and credit facilities contain financial covenants that may limit current availability and impose ongoing operational limitations and risk of compliance.

We currently maintain (i) a USD$75.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Senior Credit Facility”) with Bank of America, N.A., on its own behalf and as agent to the other lenders named therein, currently consisting of the Bank of Montreal (as the initial member of the syndicate under such loan), pursuant to an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, as amended, (ii) a CAD$29.0 million senior secured Canadian term loan from Integrated Private Debt Fund IV LP (“IPD IV”) pursuant to a CAD$29,000,000 Credit Facilities Loan Agreement (the “IPD IV Loan Agreement”), and (iii) a CAD$10.0 million senior secured Canadian term loan from Integrated Private Debt Fund V LP (“IPD V”) pursuant to a CAD$10,000,000 Credit Facilities Loan Agreement (the “IPD V Loan Agreement” and, together with the IPD IV Loan Agreement, the “IPD Loan Agreements”). Repayment of the foregoing credit facilities is secured by our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries, including, without limitation, all of the capital stock of our subsidiaries.

Under the terms of the foregoing credit facilities, we are required to comply with certain financial covenants, depending on the type of loan facility and whether certain conditions are triggered. In addition, under the IPD Loan Agreements, we are required to maintain (i) a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0, (ii) a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.2 to 1.0 and (iii) a senior debt to EBITDA ratio of at least 3.0 to 1.0.

Our compliance with the financial covenants of our credit facilities is particularly important given the materiality of such facilities to our day-to-day operations and overall acquisition strategy. If we fail to comply with these covenants and are unable to secure a waiver or other relief, our financial condition would be materially weakened and our ability to fund day-to-day operations would be materially and adversely affected. Accordingly, we intend to employ EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA as management tools to measure our historical financial performance and as a benchmark for future financial flexibility.

Under our credit facilities, we are prohibited from declaring and paying dividends unless: (i) there are no existing events of default under the credit facility or an event of default would not be caused by the declaration or payment of such dividend, and (ii) upon giving pro forma effect to the dividend, (1) the amount available under the credit facility after the pro forma effect of such dividend is equal to the greater of 15% of the U.S. borrowing base under the Senior Credit Facility or $15.0 million, and (2) U.S. availability is at least $10.0 million.

We operate with a significant amount of indebtedness, which is secured by substantially all of our assets and subject to variable interest rates and restrictive covenants.

In addition, violating covenants in these agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Consequences if the violations are not cured or waived could include substantially increasing our cost of borrowing, restricting our future operations, termination of our lenders’ commitments to supply us with further funds, cross defaults to other obligations, or acceleration of our obligations. If some or all of our obligations are accelerated, we may not be able to fully repay them.

For the foreseeable future, our success will depend largely on the continued services of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Bohn H. Crain, as well as certain of our other key executives and executives of our acquired businesses because of their collective industry knowledge, marketing skills and relationships with vendors, customers and strategic operating partners. Should any of these individuals leave us, we could have difficulty replacing them with qualified individuals and it could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations.

Our results of operations could vary as a result of the methods, estimates, and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies.

The methods, estimates, and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on our results of operations (see “Critical Accounting Policies” in Part II, Item 7 of this report). Such methods, estimates, and judgments are, by their nature, subject to substantial risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, and factors may arise over time that lead us to change our methods, estimates, and judgments. Changes in those methods, estimates, and judgments could significantly affect our results of operations.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence, anti-terrorism measures or war may affect our operations and our profitability.

As a result of the potential for terrorist attacks, federal, state and municipal authorities have implemented and continue to follow various security measures, including checkpoints and travel restrictions on large trucks. Such measures may reduce the productivity of our independent contractors and transportation providers or increase the costs associated with their operations, which we could be forced to bear. For example, security measures imposed at bridges, tunnels, border crossings and other points on key trucking routes may cause delays and increase the non-driving time of our independent contractors and transportation providers, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. We also have higher costs due to mandated security screening of air cargo traveling on passenger airlines and ocean freight. War, risk of war, or a terrorist attack also may have an adverse effect on the economy. A decline in economic activity could adversely affect our revenues or restrict our future growth. Instability in the financial markets as a result of terrorism or war also could impact our ability to raise capital. In addition, the insurance premiums charged for some or all of the coverage currently maintained by us could increase dramatically or such coverage could be unavailable in the future.

We intend to continue growing our international operations and will become increasingly subject to variations in the international trade market.

We provide services to customers engaged in international commerce, and intend to grow our international business in the coming years. For the years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, international transportation revenue accounted for ~~35%~~38% and ~~38%~~36% of our net revenue, respectively. International transportation revenue is defined as any shipment with an initiation or destination point outside of

the United States. All factors that affect international trade have the potential to expand or contract our international business and impact our operating results. For example, international trade is influenced by, among other things:

If any of the foregoing factors have a negative effect on the international trade market, we could suffer a decrease in our international business, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In connection with our international business, we are subject to certain foreign regulatory requirements, and any failure to comply with these requirements could be detrimental to our business.

We provide services in parts of the world where common business practices could constitute violations of the anticorruption laws, rules, regulations and decrees of the United States, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act and of all other countries in which we conduct business; as well as trade control laws, or laws, regulations and Executive Orders imposing embargoes and sanctions; and anti-boycott laws and regulations. Compliance with these laws, rules, regulations and decrees is dependent on our employees, subcontractors, consultants, agents, third-party brokers and customers, whose individual actions could violate these laws, rules, regulations and decrees. Failure to comply could result in substantial penalties, damages to our reputation and restrictions on our ability to conduct business. In addition, any investigation or litigation related to such violations may require significant management time and could cause us to incur extensive legal and related costs, all of which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and operating cash flows.

International operations expose us to currency exchange risk and we cannot predict the effect of future exchange rate fluctuations on our business and operating results.

~~After giving effect to our recent acquisition~~We generate a significant portion of ~~Wheels, we generate significant~~ revenues from our international operations, including a substantial amount in Canada. During the year ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, approximately ~~35%~~38% of our net revenues were generated from international ~~operations, 29% of which is attributable to Wheels.~~operations. Our international operations are sensitive to currency exchange risks. We have currency exposure arising from both sales and purchases denominated in foreign currencies, as well as intercompany transactions. Significant changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies in which we transact business and the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Historically, we have not entered into any hedging activities, and, to the extent that we continue not to do so in the future, we may be vulnerable to the effects of currency exchange-rate fluctuations.

In addition, our international operations also expose us to currency fluctuations as we translate the financial statements of our foreign operations to the U.S. dollar. There can be no guarantee that the effect of currency fluctuations will not be material in the future.

Ineffective internal controls could impact our business and operating results as well as our public reporting and stock price.

We have grown rapidly and face additional challenges of disparate systems and geographically dispersed management. Our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure are strained at times due to acquisitions and other corporate development activities. ~~From time to time, we have experienced delays in filing certain reports required under the Exchange Act.~~

Our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business and operating results could be harmed, and we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations.

There are a limited number of operating companies available for acquisition that we deem to be desirable targets. In addition, there is a very high level of competition among companies seeking to acquire these operating companies. We are and will continue to be a very minor participant in the business of seeking acquisitions of these types of companies. A large number of established and well-financed entities are active in acquiring interests in companies that we may find to be desirable acquisition candidates. Many of these entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than us. Consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in negotiating and executing possible acquisitions of these businesses. Even if we are able to successfully compete with these entities, this competition may affect the terms of completed transactions and, as a result, we may pay more or receive less favorable terms than we expected for potential acquisitions. We may not be able to identify operating companies that complement our strategy, and even if we identify a company that complements our strategy, we may be unable to complete an acquisition of such a company for many reasons, including:

We have a limited amount of financial resources and our ability to make additional acquisitions without securing additional financing from outside sources is limited. In order to continue to pursue our acquisition strategy, we may be required to obtain additional financing. We ~~intend to~~may obtain such financing through a combination of traditional debt financing or the placement of debt and equity securities. We may finance some portion of our future acquisitions by either issuing equity or by using shares of our common stock for all or a portion of the purchase price for such businesses. In the event that our common stock does not attain or maintain a sufficient market value, or potential acquisition candidates are otherwise unwilling to accept our common stock as part of the purchase price for

the sale of their businesses, we may be required to use more of our cash resources, if available, in order to maintain our acquisition program. If we do not have sufficient cash resources, we will not be able to complete acquisitions and our growth could be limited unless we are able to obtain additional capital through debt or equity financings. The terms of our credit facility require that we obtain the consent of our lenders prior to securing additional debt financing. There could be circumstances in which our ability to obtain additional debt financing could be constrained if we are unable to secure such consent.

Under the terms of our credit facilities, we may be required to obtain the consent of each of our lenders prior to making any additional acquisitions.

We are permitted to make additional acquisitions without the consent of the lenders only if certain conditions are satisfied. These conditions include the following: (i) the absence of an event of default under the Senior Credit Facility, (ii) the acquisition must be consensual; (iii) the company to be acquired must be in the transportation and logistics industry, located in the United States, Canada or certain other approved jurisdictions, and have a positive EBITDA for the 12 month period most recently ended prior to such acquisition, (iv) no debt or liens may be incurred, assumed or result from the acquisition, subject to limited exceptions, (v), the pro forma fixed charge coverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.1 to 1.0, and (vi) after giving effect for the funding of the acquisition, we must have availability under the Senior Credit Facility of at least the greater of 15% of the U.S.-based borrowing base and Canadian-based borrowing base or $15.0 million, and U.S. availability of at least $10.0 million. In addition, under the IPD Loan

Agreements, the aggregate cash consideration shall not exceed $10.0 million for any single transaction and $25.0 million in the aggregate in any fiscal year.

In the event we are not able to satisfy the conditions of our credit facilities in connection with a proposed acquisition, we must either forego the acquisition, obtain the consent of the lenders, or retire the credit facility. This may prevent us from completing acquisitions that we determine are desirable from a business perspective and limit or slow our ability to achieve the critical mass we need to achieve our strategic objectives.

To the extent we make any material acquisitions, our earnings will be adversely affected by non-cash charges relating to the amortization of ~~intangibles,~~intangible assets, which may cause our stock price to decline.

Under applicable accounting standards, purchasers are required to allocate the total consideration paid in a business combination to the identified acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values at the time of acquisition. The excess of the consideration paid to acquire a business over the fair value of the identifiable tangible assets acquired must be allocated among identifiable intangible assets including goodwill. The amount allocated to goodwill is not subject to amortization. However, it is tested at least annually for impairment. The amount allocated to identifiable ~~intangibles,~~intangible assets, such as customer relationships and the like, is amortized over the life of these intangible assets. We expect that this will subject us to periodic charges against our earnings to the extent of the amortization incurred for that period. Because our business strategy focuses, in part, on growth through acquisitions, our future earnings will be subject to greater non-cash amortization charges than a company whose earnings are derived solely from organic growth. As a result, we will experience an increase in non-cash charges related to the amortization of intangible assets acquired in our acquisitions. Our financial statements will show that our intangible assets are diminishing in value, even if the acquired businesses are increasing (or not diminishing) in value. Because of this discrepancy, we believe our EBITDA, a measure of financial performance that does not conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), of the United States, provides a meaningful measure of our financial performance. However, the investment community generally measures a public company’s performance by its net income. Further, the financial covenants of our credit facility adjust EBITDA to exclude costs related to share-based compensation and other non-cash charges. Thus, we believe that EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA provide a meaningful measure of our financial performance. If the investment community elects to place more emphasis on net income, the future price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

We are not obligated to follow any particular criteria or standards for identifying acquisition candidates.

Other than as required under the credit facility, we are not obligated to follow any particular operating, financial, geographic or other criteria in evaluating candidates for potential acquisitions or business combinations. We will determine the purchase price and other terms and conditions of acquisitions. Our stockholders will not have the opportunity to evaluate the relevant economic, financial and other information that our management team will use and consider in deciding whether or not to enter into a particular transaction.

We may be required to incur a significant amount of indebtedness in order to successfully implement our acquisition strategy.

Subject to the restrictions contained under our current credit facilities, we may be required to incur a significant amount of indebtedness in order to complete future acquisitions. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow from the operations of acquired businesses to make scheduled payments of principal and interest on the indebtedness, then we will be required to use our capital for such payments. This will restrict our ability to make additional acquisitions. We may also be forced to sell an acquired business in order to satisfy indebtedness. We cannot be certain that we will be able to operate profitably once we incur this indebtedness or that we will be able to generate a sufficient amount of proceeds from the ultimate disposition of such acquired businesses to repay the indebtedness incurred to make these acquisitions.

We may experience difficulties in integrating the operations, personnel and assets of acquired businesses that may disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our operating results.

A core component of our business plan is to acquire businesses and assets in the transportation and logistics industry. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage businesses or successfully integrate acquired businesses into the Company without substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial problems. Such acquisitions also involve numerous operational risks, including:

As a result, if we fail to properly evaluate and execute any acquisitions or investments, our business and prospects may be seriously harmed.

In certain acquisitions, we may recognize non-cash gains or losses on changes in fair value of contingent consideration. We include contingent consideration based on future financial performance as a portion of the purchase price of certain acquisitions. To the extent that an acquired operation underperforms relative to anticipated earnings levels, we are able to set-off certain levels of future unpaid purchase price for such acquired operations. This will result in the recognition of a non-cash gain on the change in fair value of contingent consideration. In the alternative, to the extent an acquired operation outperforms anticipated earnings levels, we will recognize a non-cash expense on the change in fair value of contingent consideration. These non-cash gains and expenses may have a material impact on our financial results, and the impact could be opposite to the underlying results of the acquired operation.

Not every acquisition is structured utilizing contingent consideration. Our 2015 acquisitions of Wheels and SBA and our 2017 acquisition of Lomas were structured without using contingent consideration. We will be unable to reduce the purchase price of these entities if they underperform relative to anticipated earnings levels.

~~We acquired Wheels, SBA, and Lomas and are currently integrating their businesses into our operations.~~

In April 2015, we acquired all of the capital stock of Wheels through a court-approved plan of arrangement. Wheels now operates as our wholly-owned subsidiary. There can be no assurance of Wheels’ ability following the acquisition to maintain and grow its revenues and operating margins in a manner consistent with its most recent operating results. Moreover, Wheels was our largest acquisition to date, and our ability to integrate Wheels’ operations with our historic operations, to realize cost synergies with Wheels, and manage the effects of the acquisition on Wheels’ existing customers and employees may be challenging.

In June 2015, we acquired SBA. This acquisition was smaller than Wheels, but on a combined basis, the acquisitions may strain our resources and ability to effectively integrate the companies into our operations. If we fail to integrate any or all of these companies effectively, or fail to achieve our revenue and cost expectations, our financial condition, results of operations, and stock price could be adversely affected.

~~In April 2017, Wheels acquired the assets and operations of Lomas. Lomas will transition to operate as Wheels and the integration is expected to take place quickly.~~

Claims against us or other liabilities we incur relating to any acquisition or business combination may necessitate our seeking claims against the seller for which the seller may not indemnify us or that may exceed the seller’s indemnification obligations.

There may be liabilities we assume in any acquisition or business combination that we did not discover or underestimated in the course of performing our due diligence investigation. A seller will normally have indemnification obligations to us under an acquisition or merger agreement, but these obligations will be subject to financial limitations, such as general deductibles and a cap, as well as time limitations. There can be no assurance that our right to indemnification from any seller will be enforceable, collectible or sufficient in amount, scope or duration to fully offset the amount of any undiscovered or underestimated liabilities. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We may face competition from parties who sell us their businesses and from professionals who cease working for us.

In connection with our acquisitions, we generally obtain non-solicitation agreements from the professionals we hire, as well as non-competition agreements from senior managers and professionals. The agreements prohibit such individuals from competing with us during the term of their employment and for a fixed period afterwards and seeking to solicit our employees or clients. In some cases, but not all, we may obtain non-competition or non-solicitation agreements from parties who sell us their business or assets. Certain activities may be carved out of or otherwise may not be prohibited by these arrangements. We cannot assure that one or more of the parties from whom we acquire assets or a business or who do not join us or leave our employment will not compete with us or solicit our employees or clients in the future. Even if ultimately resolved in our favor, any litigation associated with the non-competition or non-solicitation agreements could be time consuming, costly and distract management’s focus from locating suitable acquisition candidates and operating our business. Moreover, states and foreign jurisdictions may interpret restrictions on competition narrowly and in favor of employees.

Therefore, certain restrictions on competition or solicitation may be unenforceable. In addition, we may not pursue legal remedies if we determine that preserving cooperation and a professional relationship with the former employee or his clients, or other concerns, outweigh the benefits of any possible legal recourse or the likelihood of success does not justify the costs of pursuing a legal remedy. Such persons, because they have worked for us or a business that we acquire, may be able to compete more effectively with us, or be more successful in soliciting our employees and clients, than unaffiliated third-parties.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, and this may make it difficult for you to resell our common stock at times or at prices you find attractive.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. The current market price of our common stock may not be indicative of future market prices. Fluctuations may occur in response to the other risk factors listed in this prospectus supplement and for many other reasons, including:

In addition, the stock market historically has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations are often unrelated to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may cause declines in the market price of our common stock.

Volatility in the market price of our common stock may make it difficult for you to resell shares of our common stock when you want or at attractive prices. In addition, when the market price of a company’s common stock drops significantly, stockholders often institute securities class action lawsuits against the ~~company.~~Company. A lawsuit against us could cause us to incur substantial costs, including settlement costs or awards for legal damages, and could divert the time and attention of our management and other resources.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law may make a contested takeover more difficult.

Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (“DGCL”) could deter a change in our management or render more difficult an attempt to obtain control of us, even if such a proposal is favored by a majority of our stockholders. For example, we are subject to the provisions of the DGCL that prohibit a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a broad range of business combinations with a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns 15% or more of such corporation’s outstanding voting shares (an “interested stockholder”) for three years after the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. Our certificate of incorporation provides that directors may only be removed for cause by the affirmative vote of 75% of our outstanding shares and that amendments to our bylaws require the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of our outstanding shares. Our certificate of incorporation also includes undesignated preferred stock, which may enable our board of directors to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger or otherwise. Finally, our bylaws include an advance notice procedure for stockholders to nominate directors or submit proposals at a stockholders meeting.

Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer controls a large portion of our common stock and has substantial control over us, which could limit other stockholders’ ability to influence the outcome of key transactions, including changes of control.

Under applicable SEC rules, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Bohn H. Crain, beneficially owns approximately 20% of our outstanding common stock as of June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. Accordingly, Mr. Crain can exert substantial influence over our management and affairs and matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions, such as mergers, consolidations or the sale of substantially all of our assets. Consequently, this concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control, including a merger, consolidation, or other business combination involving us, or discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control, even if that change of control would benefit our other stockholders. Further, this concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price for our common stock because investors may perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies with concentrated stockholders.

Although our common stock is traded on the NYSE American, it remains relatively illiquid, or “thinly traded”, as compared to the volume of trading activity associated with larger companies whose shares trade on the larger national exchanges. Because of this limited liquidity, stockholders may be unable to sell their shares at the prices or volumes they desire. The trading price of our shares may from time to time fluctuate widely. The trading price may be affected by a number of factors including events described in the risk factors set forth in this report as well as our operating results, financial condition, announcements, general conditions in the industry and the financial markets, and other events or factors. In recent years, broad stock market indices, in general, and smaller capitalization companies, in particular, have experienced substantial price fluctuations. In a volatile market, we may experience wide fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. These fluctuations may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

The influx of additional shares of our common stock onto the market may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock.

We have completed many acquisitions which often include the issuance of additional shares pursuant to the purchase agreements. During the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, we issued approximately ~~160,000~~37,000 unregistered shares of our common stock as part of the purchase price, or associated with the financing of a transaction. In addition, we may issue additional shares in connection with such acquisitions upon the achievement of certain earn-out thresholds or in connection with future acquisitions as part of the purchase consideration. The availability of additional shares for sale to the public under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and sale of such shares in public markets could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. Such an adverse effect on the market price would make it more difficult for us to sell our equity securities in the future at prices we

deem appropriate or to use our shares as currency for future acquisitions which will make it more difficult to execute our acquisition strategy.

The issuance of additional shares may result in additional dilution to our existing stockholders.

We have filed a universal shelf registration statement that allows us to publicly issue up to $100.0 million of additional securities, including debt, common stock, preferred stock, and warrants. After giving effect to our July 2015 public offering of common stock, approximately $48.3 million remains available under the shelf registration statement. The shelf registration is intended to provide greater flexibility to us in financing growth or changing our capital structure.

At any time, we may make private offerings of our securities. We have issued, and may be required to issue, additional shares of common stock or common stock equivalents in payment of the purchase price of businesses we have acquired. This will have the effect of further increasing the number of shares outstanding. In connection with future acquisitions, we may undertake the issuance of more shares of common stock without notice to our then existing stockholders. We may also issue additional shares in order to, among other things, compensate employees or consultants or for other valid business reasons in the discretion of our board of directors, which could result in diluting the interests of our existing stockholders.

The exercise or conversion of our outstanding options, warrants or other convertible securities or any derivative securities we issue in the future will result in the dilution of the ownership interests of our existing stockholders and may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. We are currently authorized to issue 100 million shares of common stock. As of ~~September 1, 2017,~~August 30, 2019, we had ~~49,085,951~~49,669,091 outstanding shares of common stock. We may in the future issue up to ~~3,346,594~~2,330,163 additional shares of our common stock upon exercise of existing options.

We may issue shares of preferred stock with greater rights than our common stock.

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms for those shares without the approval of our stockholders. Any such preferred stock we may issue in the future could rank ahead of our common stock in many ways, including in terms of dividends, liquidation rights, and voting rights.

As we do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock, investors in our shares of common stock will not receive any dividend income.

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any dividends that we may pay in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors, and will depend on our future earnings, any applicable regulatory considerations, our financial requirements and other similarly unpredictable factors. Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is further limited by the terms of our credit ~~facilities and outstanding 9.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Shares”).~~facilities. Accordingly, investors seeking dividend income should not purchase our common stock.

If we are unable to pay quarterly dividends to the holders of our Series A Preferred Shares, we may be subject to additional penalties and requirements, all of which could have a negative effect on the holders of our common stock.

We are required to pay quarterly dividends on the shares of our Series A Preferred Shares equal to 9.75% per annum per $25.00 stated liquidation preference per Series A Preferred Share. If we do not pay dividends in full on the Series A Preferred Shares on any two dividend payment dates (whether consecutive or not), then the per annum dividend rate will increase by an additional 2.00% per $25.00 stated liquidation preference, or $0.50 per annum per Series A Preferred Share, commencing on and after the day following such second dividend payment date. On each subsequent dividend payment date on which cash dividends on the Series A Preferred Shares are not declared and paid, the annual dividend rate on the Series A Preferred Shares payable shall increase by an additional 2.00% per annum per $25.00 stated liquidation preference per Series A Preferred Share, up to a maximum annual dividend rate on the Series A Preferred Shares of 19.00%. The increase in dividend rates would have a detrimental effect on the value of the Company and the holders of its common stock.

In addition, while the voting rights of Series A Preferred Shares is extremely limited, in the event that we fail to pay six quarterly dividends, whether consecutive or not, on the Series A Preferred Shares or fail to maintain a listing on a national securities exchange, the holders of Series A Preferred Shares will have the right, voting together as a class with all other classes or series of parity securities upon which like voting rights have conferred and are exercisable, to elect two additional directors to serve on our board of directors. The appointment of such two designees to our board of directors could inhibit our ability to execute our business plan and pursue additional acquisitions.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock, to some extent, depends on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our shares or lower their opinion of our shares, our share price may decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our business or fails to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.

~~We cannot assure you that quarterly dividends on, or any other payments in respect of, the Series A Preferred Shares will be made timely or at all.~~

We cannot assure you that we will be able to pay quarterly dividends on the Series A Preferred Shares or to redeem the Series A Preferred Shares, if we wanted to do so. Quarterly dividends on our Series A Preferred Shares will be paid from funds legally available for such purpose when, as and if declared by our board of directors. You should be aware that certain factors may influence our decision, or adversely affect our ability, to pay dividends on, or make other payments in respect of, our Series A Preferred Shares, including, among other things:

Based on its evaluation of these and other relevant factors, our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, decide not to declare a dividend on the Series A Preferred Shares for any quarterly period for any reason, regardless of whether we have funds legally available for such purpose. In such event, the sole recourse will be the rights as a holder of Series A Preferred Shares specified in the certificate of designation for such shares, including the right to cumulative dividends and the further right under certain specified circumstances to additional interest and limited conditional voting rights.

In addition, under our Senior Credit Facility, we are prohibited from declaring and paying dividends unless: (i) there are no existing events of default under the Senior Credit Facility or an event of default would not be caused by the declaration or payment of such dividend, and (ii) the amount available under the credit facility after the pro forma effect of such dividend is at least $20.0 million and the U.S. availability is at least $12.5 million; or availability is at least the greater of 15% of the U.S. borrowing base under the credit facility, U.S. availability is at least $10.0 million and the pro forma fixed charge coverage ratio is at least 1.1 to 1.0.

The Series A Preferred Shares represent perpetual equity interests in us and, unlike our indebtedness, will not entitle the holders thereof to receive payment of a principal amount at a particular date. As a result, holders of the Series A Preferred Shares may be required to bear the financial risks of an investment in the Series A Preferred Shares for an indefinite period of time. In addition, the Series A Preferred Shares will rank junior to all our indebtedness and other liabilities, and to any other senior securities we may issue in the future with respect to assets available to satisfy claims against us.

~~Increases in market interest rates may adversely affect the trading price of our Series A Preferred Shares.~~

One of the factors that will influence the trading price of our Series A Preferred Shares will be the dividend yield on the Series A Preferred Shares relative to market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates, which are currently at low levels relative to historical rates, may reduce demand for our Series A Preferred Shares and would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution. Accordingly, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our Series A Preferred Shares to decrease.

~~The Series A Preferred Shares have not been rated, and the lack of a rating may adversely affect the trading price of the Series A Preferred Shares.~~

We have not sought to obtain a rating for the Series A Preferred Shares, and the shares may never be rated. It is possible, however, that one or more rating agencies might independently determine to assign a rating to the Series A Preferred Shares or that we may elect to obtain a rating of our Series A Preferred Shares in the future. In addition, we may elect to issue other securities for which we may seek to obtain a rating. The market value of the Series A Preferred Shares could be adversely affected if:

Our Series A Preferred Shares are junior to our debt liabilities and lease obligations, the debt and other liabilities of our subsidiaries and third-party holders’ of equity interests in our subsidiaries and the interests could be diluted by our issuance of additional shares of preferred stock, including additional Series A Preferred Shares, and by other transactions.

Our Series A Preferred Shares are subordinated to all of our existing and future indebtedness and lease obligations. As of June 30, 2017, we and our subsidiaries had outstanding indebtedness and liabilities of approximately $166.1 million, all of which is senior in right of payment to the Series A Preferred Shares. Our existing indebtedness restricts, and our future indebtedness may include restrictions on our ability to pay dividends to preferred stockholders.

Our certificate of incorporation currently authorizes the issuance of up to five million shares of preferred stock in one or more classes or series, and we will be permitted, without notice to or consent of the holders of Series A Preferred Shares, to issue additional Series A Preferred Shares or other securities that have rights junior to such shares, up to the maximum aggregate number of authorized shares of our preferred stock. The issuance of additional preferred stock on a parity with or senior to our Series A Preferred Shares would dilute the interests of the holders of our Series A Preferred Shares, and any issuance of preferred stock senior to or on a parity with our Series A Preferred Shares or of additional indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends on, redeem or pay the liquidation preference on our Series A Preferred Shares.

Except in limited circumstances, no provisions relating to our Series A Preferred Shares protect the holders of our Series A Preferred Shares in the event of a highly leveraged or other transaction, including a merger or the sale, lease or conveyance of all or substantially all our assets or business, any of which might adversely affect the holders of our Series A Preferred Shares.

The voting rights of Series A Preferred Shares is extremely limited. However, in the event that six quarterly dividends, whether consecutive or not, payable on Series A Preferred Shares are in arrears or a listing failure has occurred and is continuing, the holders of Series A Preferred Shares will have the right, voting together as a class with all other classes or series of parity securities upon which like voting rights have conferred and are exercisable, to elect two additional directors to serve on our board of directors.

~~Investors should not expect us to redeem the Series A Preferred Shares on the date the Series A Preferred Shares becomes redeemable by the Company or on any particular date afterwards.~~

The shares of Series A Preferred Shares have no maturity or mandatory redemption date and are not redeemable at the option of investors under any circumstances. By their terms, the Series A Preferred Shares may be redeemed by us at our option either in whole or in part at any time on or after December 20, 2018 or, under certain circumstances, may be redeemed by us at our option, in whole, sooner than that date. Any decision we may make at any time regarding whether to redeem the Series A Preferred Shares will depend upon a wide variety of factors, including our evaluation of our capital position, our capital requirements and general market conditions at that time. You should not assume that we will redeem the Series A Preferred Shares at any particular time, or at all.

~~The Series A Preferred Shares are not convertible and purchasers may not realize a corresponding benefit if the trading price of our common stock rises.~~

The Series A Preferred Shares will not be convertible into common shares or other of our securities and will not have exchange rights or be entitled or subject to any preemptive or similar rights. In addition, the Series A Preferred Shares will earn dividends at a fixed rate (subject to adjustment). Accordingly, as noted in greater detail above, the market value of the Series A Preferred Shares may depend on, among other things, dividend and interest rates for other securities and other investment alternatives and our actual and perceived ability to make dividend or other payments in respect of our Series A Preferred Shares. Moreover, our right to redeem the Series A Preferred Shares on or after December 20, 2018 or in the event of a change in control could impose a ceiling on their value.

Our principal executive offices are located in Bellevue, Washington. WeIn addition to the more than 100 strategic operating partner locations, we also conduct business from Company-owned offices and warehouses operating from the following leased locations:

We believe our current offices and warehouses are adequately covered by insurance and are sufficient to support our operations for the foreseeable future.

~~From time to time, we and our operating subsidiaries are~~The Company is involved in various claims ~~proceedings~~ and ~~litigation~~legal actions arising in the ordinary course of ~~business, some of which are in the very early stages of litigation~~business. In many claims and ~~therefore~~actions, it is inherently difficult to ~~judge their potential materiality. For those claims for which we can judge~~determine whether any loss is probable or even reasonably possible or to estimate the ~~materiality, in~~size or range of the ~~opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not~~possible loss. Accordingly, an adverse outcome from such proceedings could have a material adverse effect on ~~our~~the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Legal expenses are expensed as incurred. A summary of potential material proceedings and litigation is as ~~follows:~~follows.

Ingrid Barahona v. Accountabilities, Inc. d/b/aa/ Accountabilities Staffing, Inc., Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. and DBA Distribution Services, ~~Superior Court of the State of~~Inc. (Ingrid Barahona California ~~Los Angeles County, Case No. BC525802~~Class Action)

On October 25, 2013, plaintiff Ingrid Barahona filed a purported class action lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California against Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. (“~~Radiant”~~RGL”) and DBA Distribution Services, Inc. (“DBA”, a wholly-owned subsidiary) (collectively referred to as the “Company”), ~~DBA~~ and two third-party staffing companies (collectively with the Company, the “Staffing Defendants”) with whom ~~Radiant~~RGL and DBA contracted for temporary employees. In the lawsuit, Ms. Barahona, on behalf of herself and the putative class, ~~seeks~~sought damages and penalties under California law, plus interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs, along with equitable remedies, alleging that she and the putative class were the subject of unfair and unlawful business practices, including certain wage and hour violations relating to, among others, failure to provide meal and rest periods, failure to pay minimum wages and overtime, and failure to reimburse employees for work-related expenses. Ms. Barahona ~~alleges~~alleged that she was jointly employed by the staffing companies and ~~Radiant~~RGL and DBA. ~~Radiant~~RGL and DBA ~~deny~~denied Ms. Barahona’s allegations in their entirety, ~~deny~~denied that ~~we are~~they were liable to Ms. Barahona or the putative class members in any way, and ~~are~~ vigorously ~~defending~~defended against these allegations based upon ~~our~~a preliminary evaluation of applicable records and legal standards.

If Ms. ~~Barahona’s allegations~~Barahona were to prevail on her allegations on substantially all claims ~~we, as well as our co-defendants,~~against the Company, the Company could be liable for uninsured damages in an amount that, while not significant when evaluated against either ~~our~~the Company’s assets or current and expected level of annual earnings, could be material when judged against ~~our~~the Company’s earnings in the particular quarter in which any such damages arose, if at all. ~~However, based upon our preliminary evaluation~~

On February 19, 2019, the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss the class action case, which the court granted on March 14, 2019, and subsequently entered judgment in favor of the ~~matter, we do not believe we are likely~~Company on April 30, 2019. On May 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal, seeking appellate review. The trial judge’s decision to ~~incur material damages, if at all, since, among others: (i)~~dismiss the ~~amount of any potential damages remains highly speculative at this stage~~case and enter judgment in favor of the ~~proceedings; (ii) we do not believe as a matter~~Company will be reviewed by the Second District Court of law we should be characterized as Ms. Barahona’s employer and codefendant Accountabilities admitted to being the employer of record; (iii) wage and hour class actions of this nature typically settle for amounts significantly less than plaintiffs’ demands because of the uncertainly with litigation and the difficulty in taking these types of cases to trial; and (iv) Ms. Barahona has indicated her desire to resolve this matter through a mediated settlement. Ms. Barahona admitted in a report to the court that she is unable to prosecute the case because the payroll and personnel records she needs are in the possession of Tri-State and/or Accountabilities (“Debtors”), and the case has been stayed as to them pending resolution of their chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. In January 2016, the court held a status conference, which was continued multiple times so that the parties could attempt to obtain the necessary documents. DBA and the Company informally obtained all records within co-defendants’ bankruptcy estate through their trustee’s counsel; however, those records were incomplete and did not contain the requisite time, payroll and personnel records. Based on its belief that the debtors have additional records and in an effort to lift the bankruptcy “stay”, Ms. Barahona obtained the dismissal of the debtors without prejudice from the state court action. The court set a deadline of November 30, 2017, for Ms. Barahona to file her motion for class certification, and set a further status conference for December 14, 2017, to set a briefing scheduleAppeal for the ~~motion for class certification. The court has also ordered~~State of California. To date, however, the ~~parties to participate in mediation by August 31, 2017. We have been awaiting further action from Ms. Barahona with respect to the foregoing. The mediation~~Court of Appeal has not ~~taken place and we are unsure whether the court will issue another order requiring the parties to mediate this matter in the future.~~issued an appellate briefing schedule. At this time, ~~we are~~the Company is unable to express an opinion as to the likely outcome of the matter.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock trades on the NYSE American under the symbol “RLGT.” The following table states the range of the high and low sales price per share, as applicable, of our common stock for each calendar quarter during our past two fiscal years as reported by the NYSE American. The last price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE American on September 1, 2017, was $5.07 per share.

As of ~~September 1, 2017,~~August 30, 2019, the number of stockholders of record of our common stock was ~~111.~~87. This figure does not include a greater number of beneficial holders of our common stock, whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. In addition, we and our subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictions on declaring dividends under our existing credit ~~facilities and the Certificate of Designation of our 9.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock.~~facilities. We currently do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock. Any future determination to declare cash dividends on our common stock will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws and contractual restrictions, and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc. The transfer agent and registrar’s address is 1717 Arch Street, Suite 1300, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

The graph below compares the cumulative 5-year total return of holders of our common stock with the cumulative total returns of the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index and the Russell 2000 Index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index from June 30, 2012 to June 30, 2017.

~~From July 1, 2016 through the date of this report~~In January 2019, we issued ~~the following unregistered securities:~~

We did not utilize or engage a principal underwriter in connection with the above securities transactions. The above securities were only offered, sold to or transacted with earn-outs to “accredited investors” as that term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D, promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Management believes the above shares of common stock were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

This table includes selected financial data for the last five years. This financial data should be read together with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and other financial data appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.

(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Year ended June 30,

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Operating Results:

Revenue
$
777,613

$
782,579

$
502,665

$
349,133

$
310,835

Net revenue

194,636

186,661

123,723

99,235

88,433

Income (loss) from operations

10,488

(337
)

10,550

10,524

7,422

Net income (loss) attributable to Radiant Logistics, Inc.

4,862

(3,519
)

5,875

5,118

3,657

Preferred stock dividends

2,046

2,046

2,046

1,091

—

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

2,816

(5,565
)

3,829

4,027

3,657

Per Share Data:

Net income (loss) per common share:

Basic
$
0.06

$
(0.11
)

$
0.11

$
0.12

$
0.11

Diluted
$
0.06

$
(0.11
)

$
0.10

$
0.11

$
0.10

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Basic

48,840,797

48,413,361

36,446,778

33,716,367

33,120,767

Diluted

49,993,595

48,413,361

38,021,511

35,458,401

35,690,119

Financial Position:

Technology and equipment, net
$
15,227

$
12,453

$
13,176

$
1,265

$
1,290

Total assets

289,540

263,469

305,038

120,014

83,753

Notes payable

40,422

31,319

84,745

7,243

17,981

Contingent consideration

9,920

7,485

7,613

11,167

4,025

Total stockholders' equity

123,465

119,181

84,493

40,925

15,885

~~ITEM~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and result of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other information included elsewhere in this report.

We operate as a third-party logistics company, providing multi-modal transportation and logistics services primarily in the United States and Canada. We service a large and diversified account base consisting of consumer goods, food and beverage, manufacturing and retail customers which we support from an extensive network of ~~over 100~~ operating locations across North America as well as an integrated international service partner network located in other key markets around the globe. We provide these services through a multi-brand network ~~including~~which includes over 100 locations operated exclusively on our behalf by independent agents, who we also refer to as our “strategic operating partners”, as well as approximately 20 Company-owned offices. As a third-party logistics company, we have approximately 10,000 asset-based transportation companies, including motor carriers, railroads, airlines and ocean lines in our carrier network. We believe shippers value our services because we are able to objectively arrange the most efficient and cost-effective means, type and provider of transportation service without undue influence caused by the ownership of transportation assets. In addition, our minimal investment in physical assets affords us the opportunity for a higher return on invested capital and net cash flows than our asset-based competitors.

Through our operating locations across North America, we offer domestic and international air and ocean freight forwarding services and freight brokerage services including truckload services, LTL services, and intermodal services, which is the movement of freight in trailers or containers by combination of truck and rail. Our primary business operations involve arranging the shipment, on behalf of our customers, of materials, products, equipment and other goods that are generally larger than shipments handled by integrated carriers of primarily small parcels, such as FedEx, DHL and UPS. Our services include arranging and monitoring all aspects of material flow activity utilizing advanced information technology systems. We also provide other value-added logistics services, including customs brokerage and ~~materials management and distribution~~MM&D solutions to complement our core transportation service offering.

We expect to grow our business organically and by completing acquisitions of other companies with complementary geographic and logistics service offerings. Our organic growth strategy will continue to focus on strengthening existing and expanding new customer relationships leveraging the benefit of our truck brokerage and intermodal service offerings, while continuing our efforts on the organic build-out of our network of strategic operating partner locations. In addition to our focus on organic growth, we continue to search for acquisition candidates that bring to our current platform a critical mass from a geographic and/or purchasing power standpoint along with complementary service offerings. As we continue to grow and scale our business, we believe that we are creating density in our trade lanes which creates opportunities for us to more efficiently source and manage our transportation capacity. In addition, we remain focused on leveraging our back-office infrastructure to drive productivity improvement across the organization.

Our principal source of income is derived from freight forwarding and freight brokerage services we provide to our customers. As a third-party logistics provider, we arrange for the shipment of our customers’ freight from point of origin to point of destination. Generally, we quote our customers a turnkey cost for the movement of their freight. Our price quote will often depend upon the customer’s time-definite needs (first day through fifth day delivery), special handling needs (heavy equipment, delicate items, environmentally sensitive goods, electronic components, etc.), and the means of transport (motor carrier, air, ocean or rail). In turn, we assume the responsibility for arranging and paying for the underlying means of transportation.

Our transportation revenue represents the total dollar value of services we sell to our customers. Our cost of transportation includes direct costs of transportation, including motor carrier, air, ocean and rail services. Our net transportation revenue (gross transportation revenue less the direct cost of transportation) is the primary indicator of our ability to source, add value and resell services provided by third-parties, and is considered by management to be a key performance measure. In addition, management believes measuring its operating costs as a function of net transportation revenue provides a useful metric, as our ability to control costs as a function of net transportation revenue directly impacts operating earnings.

Our operating results will be affected as acquisitions occur. Since all acquisitions are made using the ~~purchase~~acquisition method of accounting for business combinations, our financial statements will only include the results of operations and cash flows of acquired companies for periods subsequent to the date of acquisition.

Our GAAP-based net income will be affected by non-cash charges relating to the amortization of customer related intangible assets and other intangible assets attributable to completed acquisitions. Under applicable accounting standards, purchasers are required to allocate the total consideration in a business combination to the identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the time of acquisition. The excess of the consideration paid over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is to be allocated to goodwill, which is tested at least annually for impairment. Applicable accounting standards require that we separately account for and value certain identifiable intangible assets based on the unique facts and circumstances of each acquisition. As a result of our acquisition strategy, our net income will include material non-cash charges relating to the amortization of customer related intangible assets and other intangible assets acquired in our acquisitions. Although these charges may increase as we complete more acquisitions, we believe we will be growing the value of our intangible assets (e.g., customer relationships). Thus, we believe that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, is a useful financial measure for investors because it eliminates the effect of these non-cash costs and provides an important metric for our business.

EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure of income and does not include the effects of preferred stock dividends, interest and taxes, and excludes the “non-cash” effects of depreciation and amortization on long-term assets. Companies have some discretion as to which elements of depreciation and amortization are excluded in the EBITDA calculation. We exclude all depreciation charges related to technology and equipment, and all amortization charges (including amortization of leasehold improvements)~~, and other intangible assets.~~. We then further adjust EBITDA to exclude changes in fair value of contingent consideration, expenses specifically attributable to acquisitions, ~~severance~~transition and lease termination costs, foreign ~~exchange~~currency transaction gains and losses, extraordinary items, share-based compensation expense, ~~non-recurring~~ litigation expenses unrelated to our core operations, MM&D start-up costs and other non-cash charges. ~~Adjusted EBITDA is then normalized by excluding non-recurring transition costs.~~ While management considers EBITDA, ~~adjusted EBITDA,~~ and ~~normalized~~ adjusted EBITDA useful in analyzing our results, it is not intended to replace any presentation included in our consolidated financial statements.

Our operating results are also subject to seasonal trends when measured on a quarterly basis. The impact of seasonality on our business will depend on numerous factors, including the markets in which we operate, holiday seasons, consumer demand and economic conditions. Since our revenue is largely derived from customers whose shipments are dependent upon consumer demand and just-in-time production schedules, the timing of our revenue is often beyond our control. Factors such as shifting demand for retail goods and/or manufacturing production delays could unexpectedly affect the timing of our revenue. As we increase the scale of our operations, seasonal trends in one area of our business may be offset to an extent by opposite trends in another area. We cannot accurately predict the timing of these factors, nor can we accurately estimate the impact of any particular factor, and thus we can give no assurance any historical seasonal patterns will continue in future periods.

Accounting policies, methods and estimates are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management’s current judgments. These judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience regarding to past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting policies, methods and estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ from management’s current judgments. While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates that affect our financial statements, the areas that are particularly significant include revenue recognition, accruals for the cost of purchased transportation, the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, ~~changes in~~fair value of contingent consideration, accounting for ~~the issuance of shares and~~ share-based compensation, the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets, ~~acquired~~goodwill, intangible assets, ~~goodwill,~~ and the establishment of an allowance for doubtful accounts.

We perform an annual impairment test for goodwill as of April 1 of each year unless events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred before that time. We assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is ~~more likely than not~~more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. After assessing qualitative factors, if further testing is necessary we would determine the fair value of each reporting unit, and compare the fair value to the reporting unit’s carrying amount.

~~Acquired intangibles~~Intangible assets consist of customer related ~~intangibles,~~intangible assets, trade names and trademarks, and non-compete agreements arising from our acquisitions. Customer related ~~intangibles~~intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of up to 10 years, trademarks and trade names are amortized using the ~~straight line~~straight-line method over 15 years, and non-compete agreements are amortized using the ~~straight line~~straight-line method over the term of the underlying agreements.

We review long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, we estimate fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

As a non-asset based carrier, we do not generally own transportation assets. We do, however, own certain trailers and refrigerated trailers that we use in our business. We generate the majority of our air and ocean freight forwarding and freight brokerage revenues by purchasing transportation services from direct (asset-based) carriers and reselling those services to our customers. ~~Based upon the terms in the contract of carriage, freight~~Freight forwarding revenues related to shipments where we issue a House Airway Bill or a House Ocean Bill of Lading are recognized atover the ~~time the freight is tendered~~transit period as customers’ goods move from origin to ~~the direct carrier at origin.~~destination. Costs related to the shipments are also recognized at this same time based upon anticipated margins, contractual arrangements with direct carriers, and other known factors. The estimates are routinely monitored and compared to actual invoiced costs. The estimates are adjusted as deemed necessary by us to reflect differences between the original accruals and actual costs of purchased transportation. This method generally results in recognition of revenues and purchased transportation costs earlier than the preferred methods under GAAP which do not recognize revenue until a proof of delivery is received or which recognize revenue as progress on the transit is made. Our method of revenue and cost recognition does not result in a material difference from amounts that would be reported under such other methods.

All other revenue, including revenue from other value-added services including freight brokerage services, customs brokerage services and warehousing and fulfillment services, is recognized upon completion of the service.

Fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, compared to fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2016~~2018

The following table summarizes transportation services revenue, cost of transportation and net transportation services revenue by geographic operating segments for the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

Year Ended June 30, 2017

Year Ended June 30, 2016

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

Transportation revenue

Forwarding

$
558,422

$
3,982

$
(377
)

$
562,027

$
543,155

$
4,156

$
(358
)

$
546,953

Brokerage

122,646

88,600

(3,934
)

207,312

134,387

97,338

(4,316
)

227,409

681,068

92,582

(4,311
)

769,339

677,542

101,494

(4,674
)

774,362

Cost of transportation

Forwarding

398,857

3,252

(377
)

401,732

392,612

3,425

(358
)

395,679

Brokerage

112,574

72,605

(3,934
)

181,245

122,277

82,278

(4,316
)

200,239

511,431

75,857

(4,311
)

582,977

514,889

85,703

(4,674
)

595,918

Net transportation revenue

Forwarding

159,565

730

—

160,295

150,543

731

—

151,274

Brokerage

10,072

15,995

—

26,067

12,110

15,060

—

27,170

169,637

16,725

—

186,362

162,653

15,791

—

178,444

Net transportation margins

24.9
%

18.1
%

24.2
%

24.0
%

15.6
%

23.0
%

Other value-added services

4,105

4,169

—

8,274

4,949

3,268

—

8,217

Net revenues

$
173,742

$
20,894

$
—

$
194,636

$
167,602

$
19,059

$
—

$
186,661

	Year Ended June 30, 2019												Year Ended June 30, 2018
	United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations			Total			United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations			Total
Revenues
Transportation	$	766,286		$	91,710		$	(434	)	$	857,562		$	725,961		$	92,968		$	(1,263	)	$	817,666
Value-added services		13,385			19,570			—			32,955			9,440			15,311			—			24,751
		779,671			111,280			(434	)		890,517			735,401			108,279			(1,263	)		842,417
Cost of transportation and other services
Transportation		572,486			72,027			(434	)		644,079			554,082			76,072			(1,263	)		628,891
Value-added services		9,088			7,249			—			16,337			6,615			6,766			—			13,381
		581,574			79,276			(434	)		660,416			560,697			82,838			(1,263	)		642,272
Net revenues⁽¹⁾
Transportation		193,800			19,683			—			213,483			171,879			16,896			—			188,775
Value-added services		4,297			12,321			—			16,618			2,825			8,545			—			11,370
	$	198,097		$	32,004		$	—		$	230,101		$	174,704		$	25,441		$	—		$	200,145
Net Margins
Transportation		25.3	%		21.5	%	N/A				24.9	%		23.7	%		18.2	%	N/A				23.1	%
Value-added services		32.1	%		63.0	%	N/A				50.4	%		29.9	%		55.8	%	N/A				45.9	%

⁽¹⁾Net revenues are revenues net of cost of transportation and other services.

~~Forwarding~~Transportation revenue was ~~$562.0~~$857.6 million and ~~$547.0~~$817.7 million for the years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. The increase of ~~$15.0~~$39.9 million, or ~~2.7%~~4.9%, is primarily attributable to increased revenues ~~by certain strategic operating partners. Forwarding net~~from our industry vertical strategy. Net transportation revenue was ~~$160.3~~$213.5 million and ~~$151.3~~$188.8 million for the years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. Net ~~forwarding~~ transportation margins increased from ~~27.7%~~23.1% to ~~28.5%~~24.9%, primarily due to shifts in product mix.

Value added services revenue was $33.0 million and $24.8 million for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase of $8.2 million, or 32.9%, is primarily attributable to growth in our contract logistics and customer brokerage services offerings. Net value added services revenue was $16.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2019, compared to $11.4 million for the comparable prior year period. Net value added services revenue margins increased from 45.9% to 50.4%, primarily due to lower personnel costs as a percentage of ~~purchased transportation.~~revenue.

~~Brokerage~~Effective July 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method and began recognizing revenue ~~was $207.3 million and $227.4 for~~from certain contracts with customers over time as services are rendered. Periods prior to July 1, 2018, including the ~~years~~year ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018, are presented under the previous revenue recognition guidance, ASC 605, and ~~2016, respectively. The decrease of $20.1 million, or 8.8%, is primarily attributable~~have not been restated to ~~general softness~~conform to ASC 606. Additionally, the Company made some reclassifications in the ~~brokerage markets. Brokerage net transportation revenue was $26.1 million and $27.2 million for the years ended~~year ending June 30, ~~2017 and 2016, respectively. Net brokerage transportation margins increased from 11.9%~~2018 to ~~12.6%, primarily as a result of slightly lower costs of purchased transportation.~~

~~Other value-added services were $8.3 million and $8.2 million for~~conform to the ~~years ended~~year ending June 30, ~~2017 and 2016, respectively.~~2019 reporting for comparability purposes.

The following table compares condensed consolidated statements of operationsdata by geographic operating segments for the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 (in thousands):

Year Ended June 30, 2017

Year Ended June 30, 2016

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

Net revenues

$
173,742

$
20,894

$
—

$
194,636

$
167,602

$
19,059

$
—

$
186,661

Operating partner commissions

90,207

—

—

90,207

84,475

—

—

84,475

Personnel costs

37,803

11,110

3,017

51,930

40,296

10,812

3,023

54,131

Selling, general and administrative expenses

16,053

4,699

3,219

23,971

15,493

4,874

5,364

25,731

Depreciation and amortization

2,371

734

9,244

12,349

1,890

671

9,472

12,033

Transition and lease termination costs

1,582

541

137

2,260

3,339

2,606

—

5,945

Impairment of acquired intangible assets

—

—

—

—

—

—

3,680

3,680

Change in contingent consideration

—

—

3,431

3,431

—

—

1,003

1,003

Total operating expenses

148,016

17,084

19,048

184,148

145,493

18,963

22,542

186,998

Income (loss) from operations

25,726

3,810

(19,048
)

10,488

22,109

96

(22,542
)

(337
)
Other income (expense)

561

40

(2,497
)

(1,896
)

1,220

(170
)

(6,052
)

(5,002
)

Income (loss) before income tax expense

26,287

3,850

(21,545
)

8,592

23,329

(74
)

(28,594
)

(5,339
)
Income tax benefit (expense)

—

—

(3,673
)

(3,673
)

—

—

1,886

1,886

Net income (loss)

26,287

3,850

(25,218
)

4,919

23,329

(74
)

(26,708
)

(3,453
)
Less: Net income attributable to non-
   controlling interest

(57
)

—

—

(57
)

(66
)

—

—

(66
)

Net income (loss) attributable to Radiant
   Logistics, Inc.

26,230

3,850

(25,218
)

4,862

23,263

(74
)

(26,708
)

(3,519
)
Less: Preferred stock dividends

—

—

(2,046
)

(2,046
)

—

—

(2,046
)

(2,046
)

Net income (loss) attributable to common
   stockholders

$
26,230

$
3,850

$
(27,264
)

$
2,816

$
23,263

$
(74
)

$
(28,754
)

$
(5,565
)

	Year Ended June 30, 2017										Year Ended June 30, 2016										Year Ended June 30, 2019												Year Ended June 30, 2018
Selected operating expenses as a percent of net revenue:	United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations	Total			United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations	Total
																					United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations			Total			United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations			Total
Net revenues⁽¹⁾																					$	198,097		$	32,004		$	—		$	230,101		$	174,704		$	25,441		$	—		$	200,145

Operating expenses:
Operating partner commissions		51.9	%		0.0	%	N/A		46.3	%		50.4	%		0.0	%	N/A		45.3	%		102,553			—			—			102,553			88,844			—			—			88,844
Personnel costs		21.8	%		53.2	%	N/A		26.7	%		24.0	%		56.7	%	N/A		29.0	%		42,777			13,930			3,668			60,375			41,214			14,311			3,041			58,566
Selling, general and administrative expenses		9.2	%		22.5	%	N/A		12.3	%		9.2	%		25.6	%	N/A		13.8	%		18,473			6,799			3,191			28,463			15,449			8,253			2,463			26,165
Depreciation and amortization																						3,623			1,560			10,026			15,209			2,650			1,252			10,487			14,389
Transition and lease termination costs																						(11	)		—			—			(11	)		107			69			—			176
Change in fair value of contingent consideration																						—			—			(1,207	)		(1,207	)		—			—			(1,176	)		(1,176	)

Total operating expenses																						167,415			22,289			15,678			205,382			148,264			23,885			14,815			186,964

Income (loss) from operations																						30,682			9,715			(15,678	)		24,719			26,440			1,556			(14,815	)		13,181
Other income (expense)																						521			(87	)		(2,973	)		(2,539	)		430			(30	)		(3,075	)		(2,675	)

Income (loss) before income taxes																						31,203			9,628			(18,651	)		22,180			26,870			1,526			(17,890	)		10,506
Income tax expense																						—			—			(4,800	)		(4,800	)		—			—			(73	)		(73	)

Net income (loss)																						31,203			9,628			(23,451	)		17,380			26,870			1,526			(17,963	)		10,433
Less: net income attributable to non- controlling interest																						(1,034	)		—			—			(1,034	)		(245	)		—			—			(245	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Radiant Logistics, Inc.																						30,169			9,628			(23,451	)		16,346			26,625			1,526			(17,963	)		10,188
Less: preferred stock dividends																						—			—			(956	)		(956	)		—			—			(2,046	)		(2,046	)
Less: issuance costs for preferred stock redemption																						—			—			(1,659	)		(1,659	)		—			—			—			—

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders																					$	30,169		$	9,628		$	(26,066	)	$	13,731		$	26,625		$	1,526		$	(20,009	)	$	8,142

⁽¹⁾Net revenues are revenues net of cost of transportation and other services.

Operating partner commissions increased ~~$5.7~~$13.8 million, or ~~6.8%~~15.4%, to ~~$90.2~~$102.6 million for the year ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019. The increase is primarily due to increased ~~commissions resulting from increases in~~ net revenues from ~~strategic~~our industry vertical strategy. As a percentage of net revenues, operating ~~partners.~~partner commissions increased 18 basis points to 44.6% from 44.4% for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Personnel costs ~~decreased $2.2~~increased $1.8 million, or ~~4.1%~~3.1%, to ~~$51.9~~$60.4 million for the year ended June 30, ~~2017.~~ 2019. The ~~decrease~~increase is ~~attributable to workforce reduction at On Time made in connection with the loss of a significant customer in the prior fiscal year along with a reduction in headcount~~primarily due to new company owned locations opened during the previous fiscal year. As a ~~consolidation~~percentage of ~~operating locations.~~net revenues, personnel costs decreased 302 basis points to 26.2% from 29.3% for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses ~~decreased $1.7~~increased $2.3 million, or ~~6.8%~~8.8%, to ~~$24.0~~$28.5 million for the year ended June 30, ~~2017.~~ 2019. The ~~decrease~~increase is primarily ~~due~~attributable to ~~decreases in professional service fees associated with litigation~~increased technology spending, legal and ~~acquisitions in~~bad debt expense for the ~~prior year, partially offset by increased facilities~~period. As a percentage of net revenues, SG&A decreased 70 basis points to 12.4% from 13.1% for the years ended June 30, 2019 and ~~office expenses associated with the Lomas and DLT acquisitions.~~2018, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization costs increased ~~$0.3~~$0.8 million, or ~~2.6%~~5.7%, to ~~$12.3~~$15.2 million for the year ended June 30, ~~2017, primarily due~~2019. As a percentage of net revenues, depreciation and amortization decreased 58 basis points to ~~increased amortization associated with recent acquisitions.~~6.6% from 7.2% for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

~~Transition~~The transition and lease termination cost was negative $11 thousand for an adjustment to the lease termination liability for the year ended June 30, 2019. The comparable prior year period amount of $176 thousand represents lease termination costs ~~decreased $3.6 million, or 62.0%, to $2.3~~associated with facility consolidation of the Company-owned location in New Jersey with the acquisition of DLT.

Change in fair value of contingent consideration was a gain of $1.2 million for the year ended June 30, ~~2017. The United States amount in the current period primarily represents non-recurring personnel costs for SBA that are being eliminated in connection with the winding down~~2019, compared to a gain of SBA’s historical back-office operations. The comparable prior period consists of consolidation efforts in our New York locations, as well as non-recurring personnel costs for SBA. The Canada amounts represent consolidation and lease termination at the Wheels Toronto location.

~~Impairment of acquired intangible assets is attributable to the customer related intangibles associated with On Time.~~

Change in contingent consideration represents the change in the fair value of contingent consideration due to former shareholders of acquired operations. Change in contingent consideration increased $2.4 million, or 242.1%, to $3.4$1.2 million for the year ended June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The change in each year is ~~primarily~~ attributable to a ~~net increase~~change in management’s estimates of future earn-out payments through the remainder of the respective earn-out periods.

Other expenses decreased ~~$3.1~~$0.1 million, or ~~62.1%~~5.1%, to ~~$1.9~~$2.5 million for the year ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019. The change is primarily due to the ~~loss on write off of loan fees following the early repayment of indebtedness used to acquires Wheels, resulting in lower interest expense~~foreign currency transaction gain in the current ~~year, partially offset by foreign exchange gains.~~period and the loss in the prior period.

Our change in net income ~~(loss)~~ is driven principally by increased net revenues, partially offset by increased operating expenses and ~~decreased operating and interest expenses~~increased income taxes compared to the prior ~~year, partially offset by an increase in income taxes.~~year.

Our future financial results may be impacted by amortization of ~~intangibles~~intangible assets resulting from acquisitions as well as gains or losses from changes in fair value of contingent consideration that are difficult to predict.

The following table provides a reconciliation for the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 of ~~normalized~~ adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP measure ~~in accordance with SEC Regulation G~~ (in thousands):

Year Ended June 30, 2017

Year Ended June 30, 2016

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

Net revenues

$
173,742

$
20,894

$
—

$
194,636

$
167,602

$
19,059

$
—

$
186,661

Net income (loss) attributable to
   common stockholders

$
26,230

$
3,850

$
(27,264
)

$
2,816

$
23,263

$
(74
)

$
(28,754
)

$
(5,565
)
Plus: Preferred stock dividends

—

—

2,046

2,046

—

—

2,046

2,046

Net income (loss) attributable to Radiant
   Logistics, Inc.

26,230

3,850

(25,218
)

4,862

23,263

(74
)

(26,708
)

(3,519
)

Income tax expense (benefit)

—

—

3,673

3,673

—

—

(1,886
)

(1,886
)
Depreciation and amortization

2,371

734

9,244

12,349

1,890

671

9,472

12,033

Net interest expense

—

—

2,497

2,497

—

—

4,872

4,872

EBITDA

28,601

4,584

(9,804
)

23,381

25,153

597

(14,250
)

11,500

Share-based compensation

897

19

388

1,304

798

209

400

1,407

Change in contingent consideration

—

—

3,431

3,431

—

—

1,003

1,003

Acquisition related costs

—

—

944

944

—

407

2,039

2,446

Legal costs

—

—

177

177

—

—

1,066

1,066

Non-recurring costs

—

—

14

14

—

—

279

279

Lease termination costs

(112
)

541

137

566

211

2,334

—

2,545

Impairment of acquired intangible assets

—

—

—

—

—

—

3,680

3,680

Loss on write-off of loan fees

—

—

—

—

—

—

1,180

1,180

Foreign exchange loss (gain)

(241
)

19

—

(222
)

(950
)

250

—

(700
)

Adjusted EBITDA

29,145

5,163

(4,713
)

29,595

25,212

3,797

(4,603
)

24,406

Transition costs

1,539

—

—

1,539

2,408

—

—

2,408

Normalized Adjusted EBITDA

$
30,684

$
5,163

$
(4,713
)

$
31,134

$
27,620

$
3,797

$
(4,603
)

$
26,814

Adjusted EBITDA as a % of Net
   Revenues

16.8
%

24.7
%

N/A

15.2
%

15.0
%

19.9
%

N/A

13.1
%
Normalized Adjusted EBITDA as a % of
   Net Revenues

17.7
%

24.7
%

N/A

16.0
%

16.5
%

19.9
%

N/A

14.4
%

	Year Ended June 30, 2019												Year Ended June 30, 2018
	United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations			Total			United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations			Total
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	30,169		$	9,628		$	(26,066	)	$	13,731		$	26,625		$	1,526		$	(20,009	)	$	8,142
Plus: preferred stock dividends		—			—			956			956			—			—			2,046			2,046
Plus: issuance costs for preferred stock redemption		—			—			1,659			1,659			—			—			—			—
Net income (loss) attributable to Radiant Logistics, Inc.		30,169			9,628			(23,451	)		16,346			26,625			1,526			(17,963	)		10,188

Income tax expense		—			—			4,800			4,800			—			—			73			73
Depreciation and amortization		3,623			1,560			10,026			15,209			2,650			1,252			10,487			14,389
Net interest expense		—			—			2,973			2,973			—			—			3,075			3,075

EBITDA		33,792			11,188			(5,652	)		39,328			29,275			2,778			(4,328	)		27,725

Share-based compensation		985			98			529			1,612			925			119			470			1,514
Change in fair value of contingent consideration		—			—			(1,207	)		(1,207	)		—			—			(1,176	)		(1,176	)
Acquisition related costs		—			75			241			316			—			—			239			239
Litigation costs		—			—			754			754			—			—			346			346
Non-recurring costs		—			—			128			128			—			—			—			—
Transition and lease termination costs		(11	)		—			—			(11	)		107			69			—			176
MM&D Start-up costs		—			—			—			—			—			410			—			410
Foreign currency transaction loss (gain)		(248	)		88			—			(160	)		(17	)		25			—			8

Adjusted EBITDA	$	34,518		$	11,449		$	(5,207	)	$	40,760		$	30,290		$	3,401		$	(4,449	)	$	29,242
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of net revenues ⁽¹⁾		17.4	%		35.8	%	N/A				17.7	%		17.3	%		13.4	%	N/A				14.6	%

~~Fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, compared to fiscal year ended June 30, 2015~~

~~The following table summarizes transportation revenue,~~⁽¹⁾Net revenues are revenues net of cost of transportation and ~~net transportation revenue by geographic operating segments for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):~~other services.

Year Ended June 30, 2016

Year Ended June 30, 2015

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

Transportation revenue

Forwarding

$
543,155

$
4,156

$
(358
)

$
546,953

$
434,976

$
3,427

$
—

$
438,403

Brokerage

134,387

97,338

(4,316
)

227,409

37,575

25,881

(941
)

62,515

677,542

101,494

(4,674
)

774,362

472,551

29,308

(941
)

500,918

Cost of transportation

Forwarding

392,612

3,425

(358
)

395,679

321,704

2,112

—

323,816

Brokerage

122,277

82,278

(4,316
)

200,239

33,805

22,262

(941
)

55,126

514,889

85,703

(4,674
)

595,918

355,509

24,374

(941
)

378,942

Net transportation revenue

Forwarding

150,543

731

—

151,274

113,272

1,315

—

114,587

Brokerage

12,110

15,060

—

27,170

3,770

3,619

—

7,389

162,653

15,791

—

178,444

117,042

4,934

—

121,976

Net transportation margins

24.0
%

15.6
%

23.0
%

24.8
%

16.8
%

24.4
%

Other value-added services

4,949

3,268

—

8,217

1,132

615

—

1,747

Net revenues

$
167,602

$
19,059

$
—

$
186,661

$
118,174

$
5,549

$
—

$
123,723

~~Forwarding revenue was $547.0 million and $438.4 million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase of $108.6 million, or 24.8%, is primarily attributable to~~ ~~the acquisition of Wheels and SBA, a full year of revenues for DCA and the addition of several new strategic operating partner locations.~~ Forwarding net transportation revenue was $151.3 million and $114.6 million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Net forwarding transportation margins increased from 26.1% to 27.7%, primarily due to changes in product mix.

~~Brokerage revenue was $227.4 million and $62.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase of $164.9 million, or 263.8%, is primarily attributable~~ ~~a full year of revenues for Wheels. Brokerage net transportation revenue was $27.2 million and $7.4 million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Net brokerage transportation margins increased from 11.8% to 11.9%.~~

~~Other value-added services were $8.2 million and $1.7 million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.~~

~~The following table compares condensed consolidated statements of operations data by geographic operating segments for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):~~

Year Ended June 30, 2016

Year Ended June 30, 2015

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

Net revenues

$
167,602

$
19,059

$
—

$
186,661

$
118,174

$
5,549

$
—

$
123,723

Operating partner commissions

84,475

—

—

84,475

60,356

—

—

60,356

Personnel costs

40,296

10,812

3,023

54,131

28,608

3,155

2,462

34,225

Selling, general and administrative expenses

15,493

4,874

5,364

25,731

9,786

1,548

4,050

15,384

Depreciation and amortization

1,890

671

9,472

12,033

798

167

5,394

6,359

Transition and lease termination costs

3,339

2,606

—

5,945

678

92

—

770

Impairment of acquired intangible assets

—

—

3,680

3,680

—

—

—

—

Change in contingent consideration

—

—

1,003

1,003

(3,921
)

—

—

(3,921
)

Total operating expenses

145,493

18,963

22,542

186,998

96,305

4,962

11,906

113,173

Income (loss) from operations

22,109

96

(22,542
)

(337
)

21,869

587

(11,906
)

10,550

Other income (expense)

1,220

(170
)

(6,052
)

(5,002
)

(471
)

(252
)

(1,856
)

(2,579
)

Income (loss) before income tax expense

23,329

(74
)

(28,594
)

(5,339
)

21,398

335

(13,762
)

7,971

Income tax benefit (expense)

—

—

1,886

1,886

—

—

(2,016
)

(2,016
)

Net income (loss)

23,329

(74
)

(26,708
)

(3,453
)

21,398

335

(15,778
)

5,955

Less: Net income attributable to non-
   controlling interest

(66
)

—

—

(66
)

(80
)

—

—

(80
)

Net income (loss) attributable to Radiant
   Logistics, Inc.

23,263

(74
)

(26,708
)

(3,519
)

21,318

335

(15,778
)

5,875

Less: Preferred stock dividends

—

—

(2,046
)

(2,046
)

—

—

(2,046
)

(2,046
)

Net income (loss) attributable to common
   stockholders

$
23,263

$
(74
)

$
(28,754
)

$
(5,565
)

$
21,318

$
335

$
(17,824
)

$
3,829

Operating partner commissions increased $24.1 million, or 40.0%, to $84.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to a full year of operations of SBA which added approximately 40 strategic operating partner locations whom are paid commissions, changes in sales mix with a higher percentage of domestic revenues, which tend to create higher commissions, compared to international revenues, and new strategic operating partners who joined the Radiant network.

Personnel costs increased $19.9 million, or 58.2%, to $54.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to a full year of operations associated with the acquisitions of Wheels, SBA, DCA and Highways, as well as increased investment in the management structure of the organization.

SG&A expenses increased $10.3 million, or 67.3%, to $25.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to normal expenses associated with the acquisitions of Wheels, SBA, DCA and Highways which included increased costs for facilities, IT, communication and travel. Additionally, increased professional fees, insurance and claims were incurred due to an overall larger organization after recent acquisitions, offset partially by lower legal fees.

Depreciation and amortization costs increased $5.6 million, or 89.2%, to $12.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to increased amortization associated with a full year of the Wheels, SBA, DCA and Highways acquisitions from fiscal year 2015.

Transition and lease termination costs increased $5.1 million, or 672.1%, to $5.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2016. Transition and lease termination costs for the year ended June 30, 2016 were due to consolidation at the Wheels Toronto location and non-recurring personnel costs in connection with the winding-down of SBA’s historical back-office operations.

Transition and lease termination costs for the year ended June 30, 2015 were due to the exit and downsizing of the former DBA warehouse and corporate headquarters in New Jersey to a smaller location, similar costs associated with a consolidation effort at the Wheels Toronto location, and non-recurring personnel costs in connection with the winding-down of SBA’s historical back-office operations.

~~Impairment of acquired intangible assets is attributable to the customer related intangibles associated with On Time.~~

Change in contingent consideration represents the change in the fair value of contingent consideration due to former shareholders of acquired operations. Change in contingent consideration increased $4.9 million, or 125.6%, to $1.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2016. The change is primarily attributable to an increase in management’s estimates of future payouts with respect to DCA, PCA, and Highways, offset by a decrease in management’s estimated future payouts for On Time, as it did not achieve its specified operating objectives.

Other expenses increased $2.4 million, or 94.0%, to $5.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to higher interest expense on indebtedness used to acquire Wheels and a loss on write off of loan fees, partially offset by foreign exchange gains.

~~Our net loss is principally due to increased depreciation, amortization, and interest expenses compared to the prior year, partially offset by an income tax benefit.~~

The following table provides a reconciliation for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 of normalized adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP measure in accordance with SEC Regulation G (in thousands):

Year Ended June 30, 2016

Year Ended June 30, 2015

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

Net revenues

$
167,602

$
19,059

$
—

$
186,661

$
118,174

$
5,549

$
—

$
123,723

Net income (loss) attributable to common
   stockholders

$
23,263

$
(74
)

$
(28,754
)

$
(5,565
)

$
21,318

$
335

$
(17,824
)

$
3,829

Plus: Preferred stock dividends

—

—

2,046

2,046

—

—

2,046

2,046

Net income (loss) attributable to
   Radiant Logistics, Inc.

23,263

(74
)

(26,708
)

(3,519
)

21,318

335

(15,778
)

5,875

Income tax expense (benefit)

—

—

(1,886
)

(1,886
)

—

—

2,016

2,016

Depreciation and amortization

1,890

671

9,472

12,033

798

167

5,394

6,359

Net interest expense

—

—

4,872

4,872

—

—

1,856

1,856

EBITDA

25,153

597

(14,250
)

11,500

22,116

502

(6,512
)

16,106

Share-based compensation

798

209

400

1,407

790

62

263

1,115

Change in contingent consideration

—

—

1,003

1,003

(3,921
)

—

—

(3,921
)
Acquisition related costs

—

407

2,039

2,446

—

243

1,802

2,045

Legal costs

—

—

1,066

1,066

—

—

601

601

Non-recurring costs

—

—

279

279

—

—

—

—

Lease termination costs

211

2,334

—

2,545

491

92

—

583

Impairment of acquired intangible assets

—

—

3,680

3,680

—

—

—

—

Loss on write-off of loan fees

—

—

1,180

1,180

—

—

—

—

Foreign exchange loss (gain)

(950
)

250

—

(700
)

471

268

—

739

Adjusted EBITDA

25,212

3,797

(4,603
)

24,406

19,947

1,167

(3,846
)

17,268

Transition costs

2,408

—

—

2,408

158

—

—

158

Normalized Adjusted EBITDA

$
27,620

$
3,797

$
(4,603
)

$
26,814

$
20,105

$
1,167

$
(3,846
)

$
17,426

Adjusted EBITDA as a % of Net
   Revenues

15.0
%

19.9
%

N/A

13.1
%

16.9
%

21.0
%

N/A

14.0
%
Normalized Adjusted EBITDA as a % of
   Net Revenues

16.5
%

19.9
%

N/A

14.4
%

17.0
%

21.0
%

N/A

14.1
%

Fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2016~~2018

Net cash provided by operating activities ~~was $14.9~~were $39.8 million and ~~$21.4~~$4.8 million for the years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. The cash provided primarily consisted of net income ~~or loss~~ adjusted for depreciation and amortization and changes in accounts payable and accounts receivable. Compared to the prior fiscal year, cash provided by operating activities increased mainly due to increased collections from customers and decreased payments to suppliers.

Net cash used for investing activities ~~was $16.3~~were $6.2 million and ~~$4.4~~$6.8 million for the years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. The primary uses of cash were for ~~acquisitions and~~ purchases of technology and ~~equipment.~~equipment and for acquisitions. Cash paid for acquisitions was ~~$11.5 million and $0.8~~$0.7 million for the ~~years~~year ended June 30, ~~2017 and 2016, respectively.~~2018. Cash paid for purchases of technology and equipment was ~~$4.9~~$6.4 million and ~~$3.7~~$5.7 million for the years ended June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $2.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2017 and net cash used for financing activities was $19.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2016. The cash provided or used by financing activities primarily consisted of proceeds from or repayments to the credit facility, borrowings and repayment of notes payable, common stock offering, payments of contingent consideration and payments of preferred stock dividends. Proceeds from the credit facility were $4.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2017 and repayments to the credit facility were $27.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2016. Repayments of notes payable were $2.4 million and $26.3 million for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 respectively, and proceeds from notes payable was $7.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2017. Net proceeds from the common stock offering was $38.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2016. Payments of contingent consideration were $3.4 million and $1.5 million for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Payments of preferred stock dividends were $2.0 million for each of the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $21.4 million and $2.1 million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The cash provided primarily consisted of net income or loss adjusted for amortization, contingent consideration, loss on the write-off of loan fees, lease termination costs, and changes in operating assets and liabilities (primarily the changes in accounts receivable and accounts payable).

Net cash used for investing activities was $4.4 million and $47.9 million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The primary uses of cash were for acquisitions and purchases of technology and equipment. Cash paid for acquisitions was $0.8 million and $44.0 million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Cash paid for purchases of technology and equipment was $3.7 million and $4.1 million for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Net cash used for financing activities was ~~$19.6~~$35.1 million ~~for the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to~~and net cash provided of $50.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2015. The cash provided or used by financing activities primarily consisted of proceeds from or repayments to the credit facility, borrowings and repayment of notes payable, common stock offering, payments of contingent consideration and payments of preferred stock dividends. Repayments to the credit facility were $27.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2016 and borrowings from the credit facility were $30.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2015. Repayments of notes payable were $26.3 million and proceeds from notes payable were $25.5was $1.4 million for the years ended June 30, ~~2016~~2019 and ~~2015,~~2018, respectively. Net repayments to the credit facility was $7.8 million and net proceeds from the ~~common~~credit facility was $7.9 million for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Payment for the redemption of preferred stock ~~offering~~ was ~~$38.4~~$21.0 million for the year ended June 30, ~~2016.~~2019. The redemption was funded by a combination of cash on hand and the Senior Credit Facility. The benefit of future reductions in payments of preferred stock dividends will be offset, by some extent, by the increase in debt service payments under the Senior Credit Facility. Repayments of notes payable were $3.7 million and $3.4 million for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Payments of contingent consideration were ~~$1.5~~$0.2 million and ~~payments~~$0.4 million for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Payments of preferred stock dividends were $1.3 million and $2.0 million for ~~each of~~ the years ended June 30, ~~2016~~2019 and ~~2015.~~2018, respectively.

Given our continued focus on the build-out of our network of operating partner locations, we believe that our current working capital and anticipated cash flow from operations are adequate to fund existing operations for the next 12 months. However, continued growth through strategic acquisitions will require additional sources of financing as our existing working capital is not sufficient to finance our operations and an acquisition program. Thus, our ability to finance future acquisitions will be limited by the availability of additional capital. We may, however, finance acquisitions using our common stock as all or some portion of the consideration. In the event that our common stock does not attain or maintain a sufficient market value or potential acquisition candidates are otherwise unwilling to accept our securities as part of the purchase price for the sale of their businesses, we may be required to utilize more of our cash resources, if available, in order to continue our acquisition program. If we do not have sufficient cash resources through either operations or from debt facilities, our growth could be limited unless we are able to obtain such additional capital.

~~Below are descriptions of recent~~We have not made any material acquisitions in the last ~~three~~two fiscal years including a breakdown of consideration paid at closing and future potential earn-out payments. We define “material acquisitions” as those with aggregate projected consideration of $14.0 million or more.

On April 2, 2015, we acquired Wheels Group, Inc., one of the largest 3PL and transportation service providers in Canada, for aggregate consideration of approximately CAD$33.8 million and 6,900,000 shares of our common stock, in addition to the refinancing of Wheels’ outstanding indebtedness of approximately CAD$32.0 million. Wheels provides 3PL intermodal and truck brokerage services throughout the United States and Canada along with third-party logistics solutions and value-added warehouse and distribution service offerings in support of U.S. shippers looking to access the Canadian markets.years.

A primary component of our business strategy is the continued development and implementation of advanced information systems to provide accurate and timely information to our management, strategic operating partners and customers. During the year ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, we spent approximately ~~$4.0~~$2.2 million on enhancing our technology and software systems in order to increase our operating efficiency. We intend to spend in excess of ~~$3.0~~$3.5 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2020 in order to continue improving our technology systems, which we expect will include the implementation of a key transportation management system that will, among other things, more fully integrate our systems with our strategic operating partners and any new operations that we may acquire in the future.

We have the USD$75.0 million ~~“Senior~~Senior Credit ~~Facility”~~Facility with Bank of America, N.A., on its own behalf and as agent to the other lenders named therein, currently consisting of the Bank of Montreal (as the initial member of the syndicate under such loan). The Senior Credit Facility matures on June 14, 2022 and is collateralized by a first-priority security interest in all of the assets of the U.S. co-borrowers, a first-priority security interest in all of the accounts receivable and associated assets of the Canadian co-borrowers (the “Canadian A/R Assets”) and a second-priority security interest on the other assets of the Canadian borrowers. Advances under the Senior Credit Facility ~~were used~~are available to fund ~~the Wheels acquisition and are available for~~ future acquisitions, ~~certain debt repayment and~~capital expenditures, repurchase of Company stock, or for other corporate purposes. Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility accrue interest at a variable rate of interest based upon LIBOR and/or one or more other interest rate indices plus an applicable margin. The Senior Credit Facility provides for advances of up to 85% of our eligible Canadian and domestic accounts receivable, 75% of eligible accrued but unbilled domestic receivables and eligible foreign accounts receivable, all of which are subject to certain sub-limits, reserves and reductions.

The co-borrowers of the Senior Credit Facility include the following: (i) with respect to U.S. obligations under the Senior Credit Facility, Radiant Logistics, Inc., Radiant Global Logistics, Inc., Radiant Transportation Services, Inc., Radiant Logistics Partners LLC, Adcom Express, Inc., Radiant Customs Services, Inc., DBA Distribution Services, Inc., International Freight Systems (of Oregon), Inc., Radiant Off-Shore Holdings LLC, Green Acquisition Company, Inc., On Time Express, Inc., Clipper Express Company, Radiant Global Logistics (CA), Service Byby Air, Inc., Highways and Skyways, Inc., and Radiant Trade Services, Inc.; and (ii) with respect to Canadian obligations under the Senior Credit Facility, Wheels International Inc., 1371482 Ontario Inc., Wheels MSM Canada Inc.,

2062698 Ontario Inc., Associate Carriers Canada Inc. and Wheels Associate Carriers Inc. As co-borrowers under the Senior Credit Facility, the accounts receivable of the foregoing entities are eligible for inclusion within the overall borrowing base of the Company and all borrowers are responsible for repayment of the debt associated with applicable advances (U.S. or Canadian) under the Senior Credit Facility. In addition, we and our U.S. subsidiaries guarantee both the U.S. and Canadian obligations under the Senior Credit Facility, while our Canadian subsidiaries guarantee only the Canadian obligations under the Senior Credit Facility.

The terms of the Senior Credit Facility are subject to a financial covenant which may limit the amount otherwise available under such facility. The covenant requires us to maintain a basic fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0 to 1.0 during any period (the “Trigger Period”) in which we are in default under the Senior Credit Facility if total availability falls below $10.0 million or if U.S. availability is less than $6.0 million.

Under the terms of the Senior Credit Facility, we are permitted to make additional acquisitions without the consent of the senior lenders only if certain conditions are satisfied. The conditions imposed by the Senior Credit Facility include the following: (i) the absence of an event of default under the Senior Credit Facility, (ii) the acquisition must be consensual; (iii) the company to be acquired must be in the transportation and logistics industry, located in the United States or certain other approved jurisdictions, and have a positive EBITDA for the 12 month period most recently ended prior to such acquisition, (iv) no debt or liens may be incurred, assumed or result from the acquisition, subject to limited exceptions, (v) after giving effect for the funding of the acquisition, we must have availability under the Senior Credit Facility of at least the greater of 15% of the U.S.-based borrowing base and Canadian-based borrowing base or $15.0 million, and U.S. availability of at least $10.0 million, and (vi) the pro forma fixed charge coverage ratio is at least 1.1 to 1.0. In the event that we are not able to satisfy the conditions of the Senior Credit Facility in connection with a proposed acquisition, we must either forego the acquisition, obtain the consent of the senior lenders, or retire the Senior Credit Facility. This may limit or slow our ability to achieve the critical mass we may need to achieve our strategic objectives.

As of June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, we have gross availability of ~~$65.9~~$65.0 million, net of $13.8 million in advances and letter of credit reserves ~~of approximately $0.3 million~~ with approximately ~~$51.8~~$51.3 million in availability under the Senior Credit Facility to support future acquisitions and our ongoing working capital requirements. We expect to structure acquisitions with certain amounts paid at closing, and the balance paid over a number of years in the form of earn-out installments which are payable based upon the future earnings of the acquired businesses payable in cash, stock or some combination thereof. As we continue to execute our acquisition strategy, we will be required to make significant payments in the future if the earn-out installments under our various acquisitions become due. While we believe that a portion of any required cash payments will be generated by the acquired businesses, we may have to secure additional sources of capital to fund the remainder of any cash-based earn-out payments as they become due. This presents us with certain business risks relative to the availability of capacity under our Senior Credit Facility, the availability and pricing of future fund raising, as well as the potential dilution to our stockholders to the extent the earn-outs are satisfied directly, or indirectly, from the sale of equity.

Senior Secured Integrated Private Debt Fund IV LP Term Loan and Fund V Term Loan

On April 2, 2015, Wheels obtained a CAD$29.0 million senior secured Canadian term loan from IPD IV pursuant to the IPD IV Loan Agreement. The Company and its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries are guarantors of the Wheels obligations thereunder. The loan matures on April 1, 2024 and accrues interest at a rate of 6.65% per annum. We made interest-only payments for the first 12 months and will make ~~blended~~ principal and interest through maturity. In connection with the loan, we paid an amount equal to five months of interest payments into a debt service reserve account controlled by IPD.

In connection with our acquisition of Lomas, Wheels obtained a CAD$10.0 million senior secured Canadian term loan from IPD V pursuant to the IPD V Loan Agreement. The Company and its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries are guarantors of the Wheels obligations thereunder. The loan matures on June 1, 2024 and accrues interest at a rate of 6.65% per annum. The loan repayment consists of monthly ~~blended~~ principal and interest payments.

The loans may be prepaid in whole at any time upon providing at least 30 days prior written notice and paying the difference between (i) the present value of the loan interest and the principal payments foregone discounted at the Government of Canada Bond Yield for the term from the date of prepayment to the maturity date, and (ii) the face value of the principal amount being prepaid.

The loans are collateralized by a (i) first-priority security interest in all of the assets of Wheels except the Canadian A/R Assets, (ii) a second-priority security interest in the Canadian A/R Assets, and (iii) a second-priority security interest on all of our assets.

The terms of the loan are subject to certain financial covenants, which require us to maintain (i) a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0 during any Trigger Period, (ii) a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.2 to 1.0 and (iii) a senior debt to EBITDA ratio of at least 3.0 to 1.0.

Under the terms of the IPD Loan Agreements, we are permitted to make additional acquisitions without IPD’s consent only if certain conditions are satisfied, including, among others: (i) the equity interests or property acquired in such acquisition constitute a business reasonably related to our business or the business of Wheels; (ii) no default or event of default shall exist prior to or will be caused as a result of such acquisition; (iii) we or Wheels shall have provided IPD with at least 10 business days prior written notice of such acquisition that must include certain descriptive information and pro forma information regarding the acquisition; (iv) such person

whose equity interests or property are being acquired shall have, ~~as of~~from the last day of the most recent fiscal quarter of such person, actual (or pro forma to the extent approved in writing by IPD) positive EBITDA and net income, in each case for the 12 month period ending on such date; (v) the aggregate cash consideration payable at the closing of the acquisition shall not exceed $10.0 million for any single transaction and $25.0 million in the aggregate, in any fiscal year or such greater amount approved in writing by IPD; provided, however, that the foregoing limitation shall exclude cash consideration derived from the proceeds of sales of newly issued equity interests of Radiant during the twelve-month period prior to the closing of such acquisition (as described below); (vi) no debt or liens may be incurred, assumed or result from the acquisition, subject to limited exceptions; (vii) the assets subject to the acquisition are free from all liens except those permitted under the IPD Loan Agreements; (viii) the post-closing U.S. availability under the Senior Credit Facility is at least ~~$10~~$10.0 million on a pro forma basis and (ix) the pro forma fixed charge coverage ratio is at least 1.1 to 1.0.

~~The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2017:~~

Actual amounts of contractual obligations may differ from estimated amounts due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We do not have any other material commitments that have not been disclosed elsewhere. For additional information regarding our indebtedness and contingent consideration, see Note 6 and Note 9, respectively of the “Notes to the consolidated financial statements” contained elsewhere in this report.

As of June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which had been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

The recent accounting ~~pronouncements are~~guidance is discussed in Note 2 of the “Notes to the ~~consolidated financial statements”~~Consolidated Financial Statements” contained elsewhere in this report.

We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of business. These risks are primarily related to foreign exchange risk. We have currency exposure arising from both sales and purchases denominated in foreign currencies, as well as intercompany transactions. Significant changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies in which we transact business and the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Historically, we have not entered into any hedging activities, and, to the extent that we continue not to do so in the future, we may be vulnerable to the effects of currency exchange-rate fluctuations. A portion of our business is conducted in Canada. If foreign exchange rates were 1.0% higher or lower, our net income would have changed by approximately ~~$20,000.~~$73,000.

We are also subject to risks related to an increase in interest rates. For every $1.0 million outstanding on our Senior Credit Facility, we will incur ~~$42,500~~approximately $60,000 of interest expense. For every 1.0% increase in interest rates, our interest expense per $1.0 million in borrowings will increase by approximately $10,000.

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Radiant Logistics, Inc. and subsidiaries ("the Company") as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019, based on the criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for revenue from contracts with customers during the year ended June 30, 2019 due to the adoption of ASU No. 2014‑09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as amended.

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally

accepted in the United States. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

(In thousands, except share and per share data)	June 30,
		2019		2018
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,420		$	6,992
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,887 and $1,703, respectively		93,123			137,578
Contract assets		17,777			—
Income tax receivable		506			2,105
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		8,066			6,599
Total current assets		124,892			153,274

Technology and equipment, net		20,127			18,566

Goodwill		65,389			65,389
Intangible assets, net		55,742			65,264
Deposits and other assets		1,560			2,945
Total other long-term assets		122,691			133,598
Total assets	$	267,710		$	305,438

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	74,097		$	90,153
Operating partner commissions payable		12,891			14,322
Accrued expenses		6,224			5,404
Current portion of notes payable		4,088			3,726
Current portion of contingent consideration		375			960
Current portion of transition and lease termination liability		215			1,385
Other current liabilities		532			295
Total current liabilities		98,422			116,245

Notes payable, net of current portion		32,500			43,197
Contingent consideration, net of current portion		—			1,615
Transition and lease termination liability, net of current portion		47			—
Deferred rent liability		862			1,020
Deferred income taxes		7,838			8,665
Other long-term liabilities		761			1,082
Total long-term liabilities		42,008			55,579
Total liabilities		140,430			171,824

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; nil and 839,200 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		—			1
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 49,678,262 and 49,511,907 shares issued, and 49,586,464 and 49,420,109 shares outstanding, respectively		31			31
Additional paid-in capital		100,186			117,968
Treasury stock, at cost, 91,798 shares		(253	)		(253	)
Retained earnings		26,883			15,539
Accumulated other comprehensive income		187			186
Total Radiant Logistics, Inc. stockholders’ equity		127,034			133,472
Non-controlling interest		246			142
Total equity		127,280			133,614
Total liabilities and equity	$	267,710		$	305,438

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(In thousands, except share and per share data)	Year Ended June 30,
	2019			2018
Revenues	$	890,517		$	842,417

Operating expenses:
Cost of transportation and other services		660,416			642,272
Operating partner commissions		102,553			88,844
Personnel costs		60,375			58,566
Selling, general and administrative expenses		28,463			26,165
Depreciation and amortization		15,209			14,389
Transition and lease termination costs		(11	)		176
Change in fair value of contingent consideration		(1,207	)		(1,176	)
Total operating expenses		865,798			829,236

Income from operations		24,719			13,181

Other income (expense):
Interest income		50			34
Interest expense		(3,023	)		(3,109	)
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses)		160			(8	)
Other		274			408
Total other expense		(2,539	)		(2,675	)

Income before income taxes		22,180			10,506

Income tax expense		(4,800	)		(73	)

Net income		17,380			10,433
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(1,034	)		(245	)

Net income attributable to Radiant Logistics, Inc.		16,346			10,188
Less: preferred stock dividends		(956	)		(2,046	)
Less: issuance costs for preferred stock redemption		(1,659	)		—

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	13,731		$	8,142

Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation gain		1			121
Comprehensive income	$	17,381		$	10,554

Income per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	0.28		$	0.17
Diluted	$	0.27		$	0.16

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		49,497,007			49,239,870
Diluted		51,082,652			50,634,671

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

l	RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data)	Preferred Stock						Common Stock				Additional Paid-in			Treasury			Retained			Accumulated Other Comprehensive		Total Radiant Logistics, Inc. Stockholders'			Non- Controlling			Total
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Capital			Stock			Earnings			Income		Equity			Interest			Equity
Balance as of June 30, 2017		839,200		$	1			49,085,417	$	30	$	116,172		$	(253	)	$	7,397		$	65	$	123,412		$	53		$	123,465
Issuance of common stock to former shareholders of acquired businesses		—			—			133,082		1		672			—			—			—		673			—			673
Share-based compensation		—			—			—		—		1,514			—			—			—		1,514			—			1,514
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—			—			201,610		—		(390	)		—			—			—		(390	)		—			(390	)
Preferred dividends paid		—			—			—		—		—			—			(2,046	)		—		(2,046	)		—			(2,046	)
Distribution to non-controlling interest		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			—		—			(156	)		(156	)
Net income		—			—			—		—		—			—			10,188			—		10,188			245			10,433
Other comprehensive income		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			121		121			—			121

Balance as of June 30, 2018		839,200		$	1			49,420,109	$	31	$	117,968		$	(253	)	$	15,539		$	186	$	133,472		$	142		$	133,614
Cumulative effect adjustment, upon adoption of ASC 606 on July 1, 2018 (Note 2)		—			—			—		—		—			—			(335	)		—		(335	)		—			(335	)
Cumulative effect adjustment, upon adoption of ASU 2016-16 on July 1, 2018 (Note 2)		—			—			—		—		—			—			(1,705	)		—		(1,705	)		—			(1,705	)
Share-based compensation		—			—			—		—		1,612			—			—			—		1,612			—			1,612
Issuance of common stock to former shareholders of acquired businesses		—			—			36,806		—		203			—			—			—		203			—			203
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—			—			129,549		—		(277	)		—			—			—		(277	)		—			(277	)
Preferred dividends paid		—			—			—		—		—			—			(1,303	)		—		(1,303	)		—			(1,303	)
Redemption of preferred stock		(839,200	)		(1	)		—		—		(19,320	)		—			(1,659	)		—		(20,980	)		—			(20,980	)
Distribution to non-controlling interest		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			—		—			(930	)		(930	)
Net income		—			—			—		—		—			—			16,346			—		16,346			1,034			17,380
Other comprehensive income		—			—			—		—		—			—			—			1		1			—			1
Balance as of June 30, 2019		—		$	—			49,586,464	$	31	$	100,186		$	(253	)	$	26,883		$	187	$	127,034		$	246		$	127,280

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(In thousands, except share and per share data)	Year Ended June 30,
		2019			2018
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	17,380		$	10,433
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCOME TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
share-based compensation		1,612			1,514
amortization of intangible assets		10,009			9,899
depreciation and amortization of technology and equipment		5,200			4,490
deferred income tax benefit		(674	)		(2,199	)
amortization of debt issuance costs		226			243
change in fair value of contingent consideration		(1,207	)		(1,176	)
transition and lease termination costs		(11	)		176
loss (gain) on disposal of technology and equipment		(11	)		5
change in allowance for doubtful accounts		184			104
CHANGES IN OPERATING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES:
accounts receivable		11,627			(21,799	)
contract assets		16,236			—
income tax receivable		1,598			(1,688	)
prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets		(1,787	)		533
accounts payable		(12,090	)		3,486
operating partner commissions payable		(472	)		3,479
accrued expenses		(6,140	)		561
other liabilities		(62	)		337
deferred rent liability		(119	)		138
payment of contingent consideration		(626	)		(2,858	)
transition and lease termination liability		(1,060	)		(917	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		39,813			4,761

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Payments to acquire businesses		—			(741	)
Purchases of technology and equipment		(6,413	)		(5,737	)
Proceeds from sale of technology and equipment		474			134
Payment for acquisition of intangible assets		(262	)		(425	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(6,201	)		(6,769	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from (repayments to) credit facility, net		(7,756	)		7,891
Payments of debt issuance costs		—			(89	)
Repayments of notes payable		(3,673	)		(3,446	)
Payments of contingent consideration		(164	)		(413	)
Payments of preferred stock dividends		(1,303	)		(2,046	)
Payment for preferred stock redemption		(20,980	)		—
Distribution to non-controlling interest		(930	)		(156	)
Payments of employee tax withholdings related to cashless exercise of stock options		(277	)		(390	)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		(35,083	)		1,351

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(101	)		1,841

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(1,572	)		1,184
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		6,992			5,808

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	5,420		$	6,992

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income taxes paid	$	4,373		$	4,062
Interest paid	$	2,804		$	2,870

In September 2017, the Company issued 10,019 shares of common stock at a fair value of $4.99 per share in satisfaction of $50 of the Sandifer-Valley Transportation & Logistics, Ltd. purchase price, resulting in an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital of $50.

In November 2017, the Company issued 123,063 shares of common stock at a fair value of $5.06 per share in satisfaction of $623 of various earn-out payments for the period ended June 30, 2017, resulting in a decrease to the current portion of contingent consideration, an increase to common stock of $1 and an increase to additional paid-in capital of $622.

In June 2018, the Company acquired $2,300 of refrigerated trailers financed through a capital lease. During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company acquired $812 of refrigerated trailers financed through a capital lease.

In January 2019, the Company issued 36,806 shares of common stock at a fair value of $5.51 per share in satisfaction of $203 of earn-out payments related to Highways and Skyways, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2018, resulting in a decrease to the current portion of contingent consideration, and an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital of $203.

In June 2019, $224 was recorded as an increase to accrued expenses and intangible assets for the purchase of a customer list for which the purchase price was not paid before year-end.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Radiant Logistics, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”) operates as a third-party logistics company, providing multi-modal transportation and logistics services primarily to customers based in the United States and Canada. The Company services a large and diversified account base which it supports from an extensive multi-brand network of over 100 operating locations (including 20 Company-owned offices) across North America as well as an integrated international service partner network located in other key markets around the globe. As a third-party logistics company, the Company has a carrier network of approximately 10,000 asset-based transportation companies, including motor carriers, railroads, airlines and ocean lines. The Company believes shippers value its services because it is able to objectively arrange the most efficient and cost-effective means, type and provider of transportation service since it is not influenced by the ownership of transportation assets. In addition, the Company’s minimal investment in physical assets affords it the opportunity for a higher return on invested capital and net cash flows than the Company’s asset-based competitors.

Through its operating locations across North America, the Company offers domestic and international air and ocean freight forwarding services and freight brokerage services including truckload services, less than truckload services; and intermodal services, which is the movement of freight in trailers or containers by combination of truck and rail. The Company’s primary transportation services involve arranging shipments, on behalf of its customers, of materials, products, equipment and other goods that are generally larger than shipments handled by integrated carriers of primarily small parcels, such as FedEx, DHL and UPS, including arranging and monitoring all aspects of material flow activity utilizing advanced information technology systems. The Company also provides other value-added supply chain services, including order fulfillment, inventory management, and warehouse and distribution services (collectively, “MM&D” services), and customs brokerage services to complement its core transportation service offering.

The Company expects to grow its business organically and by completing acquisitions of other companies with complementary geographical and logistics service offerings. The Company’s organic growth strategy will continue to focus on strengthening existing and expanding new customer relationships leveraging the benefit of the Company’s truck brokerage and intermodal service offerings, while continuing its efforts on the organic build-out of the Company’s network of strategic operating partner locations. In addition, as the Company continues to grow and scale its business, the Company believes that it is creating density in its trade lanes which creates opportunities for the Company to more efficiently source and manage its transportation capacity.

In addition to its focus on organic growth, the Company will continue to search for acquisition candidates that bring critical mass from a geographic and purchasing power standpoint, along with providing complementary service offerings to the current platform. As the Company continues to grow and scale its business, it also remains focused on leveraging its back-office infrastructure and technology systems to drive productivity improvement across the organization.

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-15 (Subtopic 350-40), Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software - Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. This ASU aligns the accounting for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the accounting for implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. ASU 2018-15 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2018-13), which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2021, and earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2018-19, 2019-04, and 2019-05 (collectively, Topic 326). Topic 326 requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. Topic 326 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2021. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2017-13, ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11, ASU 2018-20, and ASU 2019-01 (collectively, Topic 842). Topic 842 requires companies to generally recognize on the balance sheet operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) assets. Companies are required to use a modified retrospective approach on adoption, with the option of applying the requirements of the

standard either (1) retrospectively to each prior comparative reporting period presented, or (2) retrospectively at the beginning of the period of adoption, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The standard is effective for the Company on July 1, 2019. The Company will transition using the modified retrospective approach at the beginning of the period of adoption. We will elect the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which among other things, allows us to carry forward the historical lease classification.

Adoption of Topic 842 is will result in increases in assets and liabilities as follows. Adoption of the standard has no impact on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income:

On July 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and all subsequent amendments to the ASU (collectively, “ASC 606”) which superseded existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606 is for an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to its customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of an entity’s revenues and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

The Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts not completed as of July 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after July 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with ASC 605. The Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $335, net of tax, to decrease the opening balance of retained earnings as of July 1, 2018, for the initial application of ASC 606. The transition adjustment includes primarily certain transportation services transactions with customers that required a change in the timing of when revenue is recognized. The corresponding direct costs of revenue, including primarily purchased transportation costs and commissions, have been expensed as incurred. The Company satisfied a significant majority of the performance obligations for contract liabilities recorded upon the adoption and recognized the corresponding revenues and related direct costs of revenue during the year ended June 30, 2019.

As stated, the comparative prior period information for the year ended June 30, 2018 has not been adjusted and continues to be reported under the Company’s historical revenue recognition policies as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on September 13, 2018.

The details of the significant changes and quantitative impact on the financial statement line items in the consolidated balance sheet as of July 1, 2018 for the adoption of ASC 606 were as follows:

The tables below summarize the impacts of the application of ASC 606 as compared with ASC 605, the guidance that was in effect before the change on the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended June 30, 2019, and consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2019:

	Year Ended June 30, 2019
(In thousands, except per share data)	As Reported			Adjustments for ASC 606			Balance, ASC 605
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Revenues	$	890,517		$	(6,918	)	$	883,599

Operating expenses:
Cost of transportation and other services		660,416			(6,365	)		654,051
Operating partner commissions		102,553			(332	)		102,221
Personnel costs		60,375			—			60,375
Selling, general and administrative expenses		28,463			—			28,463
Depreciation and amortization		15,209			—			15,209
Transition and lease termination costs		(11	)		—			(11	)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration		(1,207	)		—			(1,207	)
Total operating expenses		865,798			(6,697	)		859,101

Income from operations		24,719			(221	)		24,498

Total other expense		(2,539	)		—			(2,539	)

Income before income taxes		22,180			(221	)		21,959
Income tax expense		(4,800	)		52			(4,748	)

Net income		17,380			(169	)		17,211
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,034	)		—			(1,034	)

Net income attributable to Radiant Logistics, Inc.		16,346			(169	)		16,177
Less: preferred stock dividends		(956	)		—			(956	)
Less: issuance costs for preferred stock redemption		(1,659	)		—			(1,659	)

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	13,731		$	(169	)	$	13,562

Income per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	0.28		$	—		$	0.28
Diluted	$	0.27		$	—		$	0.27

The adoption of ASC 606 did not have a material impact on the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2019.

The disclosure requirements of ASC 606 are included within the Company’s revised revenue recognition accounting policy in Note 3 below.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory, which provides for the recognition of the income tax consequences on intra-entity asset transfers other than inventory when the transfer occurs.

On July 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-16 using the modified retrospective method. The Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment of $1,705 directly to the beginning balance of retained earnings and deposits and other assets as of July 1, 2018. The adjustment reflects the recognition of the income tax consequence on the intra-entity transfer of stock of a subsidiary that occurred in a prior year. Under the modified retrospective method, the prior periods in a financial report do not have to be adjusted to reflect the new accounting requirements.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Radiant Logistics, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as a single variable interest entity, Radiant Logistics Partners, LLC (“RLP”), which is 40% owned by Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. (“RGL”), and 60% owned by Radiant Capital Partners, LLC (“RCP”, see Note 9), an entity owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Non-controlling interest in the consolidated balance sheets represents the minority stockholders’ proportionate share of equity in such subsidiary. Consolidated net income (loss) is allocated to the Company and non-controlling interest (minority stockholder) in proportion to their percentage ownership.

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts that, at times, may exceed federally-insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

The Company’s receivables are recorded when billed and represent amounts owed by third-party customers, as well as amounts owed by strategic operating partners. The carrying value of the Company’s receivables, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, represents their estimated net realizable value. The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable on a customer-by-customer basis. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce the net recognized receivable to an amount the Company believes will be reasonably collected. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined from the analysis of the aging of the accounts receivables, historical experience and knowledge of specific customers.

The Company derives a substantial portion of its revenue through independently-owned strategic operating partner locations operating under various Company brands. Each strategic operating partner is responsible for some or all of the collection of the accounts related to the underlying customers being serviced by such strategic operating partner. To facilitate this arrangement, based on contractual agreements, certain strategic operating partners are required to maintain a bad debt reserve in the form of a security deposit with the Company. The Company charges each strategic operating partner’s bad debt reserve account for any accounts receivable aged beyond 90 days along with any other amounts owed to the Company by strategic operating partners. However, the bad debt reserve account may carry a deficit balance when amounts charged to this reserve account exceed amounts otherwise available. In these circumstances, a deficit bad debt reserve account is recognized as a receivable in the Company’s financial statements. Some strategic operating partners are not required to establish a bad debt reserve; however, they are still responsible to make up for any deficits and the Company may withhold all or a portion of future commissions payable to the strategic operating partner to satisfy any deficit balance. Currently, a number of the Company’s strategic operating partners have a deficit balance in their bad debt reserve accounts. The Company expects to replenish these funds through the future business operations of these strategic operating partners or as their customers satisfy the amounts payable to the Company. However, to the extent any of these strategic operating partners were to cease operations or otherwise be unable to replenish these deficit accounts, the Company would be at risk of loss for any such amounts and generally would reserve for them.

Technology and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Upon retirement or other disposition of these assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is reflected in other income or expense. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and renewals of minor items are expensed as incurred. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized.

Goodwill represents the excess acquisition cost of an acquired entity over the estimated fair values assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired. The Company typically performs its annual goodwill impairment test effective as of April 1 of each year or more frequently if facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Based on the most recent annual impairment test, there was no impairment.

An entity has the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount prior to performing a quantitative impairment test. The qualitative assessment evaluates various factors, such as macro-economic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, relevant events and financial trends that may impact the fair value of the reporting unit. If it is determined that the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is more-likely-than-not less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, a quantitative assessment is required. Otherwise, no further analysis is required.

If a quantitative assessment is performed, a reporting unit’s fair value is compared to its carrying value. A reporting unit’s fair value is determined based upon consideration of various valuation methodologies, including the ~~notes thereto~~income approach, which utilizes projected future cash flows discounted at rates commensurate with the risks involved, and multiples of current and future earnings. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized cannot exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. As of June 30, 2019, management believes there are no indications of impairment.

Long-lived assets, such as technology and equipment, and definite-lived intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset or asset group to be tested for possible impairment, the Company compares the undiscounted expected future cash flows to be generated by that asset or asset group to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment charge is recognized to the extent the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds the fair value. Fair values of long-lived assets are determined through various techniques, such as applying probability weighted, expected present value calculations to the estimated future cash flows using assumptions a market participant would utilize, or through the use of a third-party independent appraiser or valuation specialist.

Management has performed a review of all long-lived assets and has determined no impairment of the respective carrying value has occurred as of June 30, 2019. Intangible assets consist of customer related intangible assets, trade names and trademarks, and non-compete agreements arising from the Company’s acquisitions. Customer related intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of up to 10 years, trademarks and trade names are amortized using the straight-line method over 15 years, and non-compete agreements are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the underlying agreements.

The Company accounts for business acquisitions using the acquisition method as required by FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, including identifiable intangible assets, are recorded based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition expenses are expensed as incurred. While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date, the estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement.

The fair values of intangible assets are estimated using a discounted cash flow approach with Level 3 inputs. The estimate of fair value of an intangible asset is equal to the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows (excess earnings) attributable solely to the intangible asset over its remaining useful life. To estimate fair value, the Company uses risk-adjusted cash flows discounted at rates considered appropriate given the inherent risks associated with each type of asset. The Company believes the level and timing of cash flows appropriately reflects market participant assumptions.

For acquisitions that involve contingent consideration, the Company records a liability equal to the fair value of the contingent consideration obligation as of the acquisition date. The Company determines the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration based on the likelihood of paying the additional consideration. The fair value is estimated using projected future operating results and the ~~report~~corresponding future earn-out payments that can be earned upon the achievement of ~~our~~specified operating objectives and financial results by acquired companies using Level 3 inputs and the amounts are then discounted to present value. These liabilities are measured quarterly at fair value, and any change in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability is recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Amounts are generally due annually on November 1^st, and 90 days following the quarter of the final earn-out period of each respective acquisition.

During the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding adjustment to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

The Company’s revenues are primarily from transportation services, which includes providing for the arrangement of freight, both domestically and internationally, through modes of transportations such as air freight, ocean freight, truckload, less than truckload and intermodal. The Company generates its transportation services revenue by purchasing transportation from direct carriers and reselling those services to its customers.

In general, each shipment transaction or service order constitutes a separate contract with the customer. A performance obligation is created once a customer agreement with an agreed upon transaction price exists. The transaction price is typically fixed and not contingent upon the occurrence or non-occurrence of any other event. The transaction price is generally due 30 to 45 days from the date of invoice. The Company’s transportation transactions provide for the arrangement of the movement of freight to a customer’s destination. The transportation services, including certain ancillary services, such as loading/unloading, freight insurance and customs clearance, that is provided to the customer as a single performance obligation. These performance obligations are satisfied and recognized in revenue upon the transfer of control of the services over the requisite transit period as the customer’s goods move from origin to destination. The Company determines the period to recognize revenue in transit based upon the departure date and the delivery date, which may be estimated if delivery has not occurred as of the reporting date. Determination of the transit period and the

percentage of completion of the shipment as of the reporting date requires management to make judgments that affect the timing of revenue recognition. The Company has determined that revenue recognition over the transit period provides a reasonable estimate of the transfer of services to its customers as it depicts the pattern of the Company’s performance under the contracts with its customers.

The Company also provides warehouse and distribution logistics services for its customers under contracts generally ranging from a few months to five years and include renewal provisions. These warehouse and distribution logistics services contracts provide for inventory management, order fulfilment and warehousing of the Customer’s product and arrangement of transportation of the customer’s product. The Company’s performance obligations are satisfied over time as the customers simultaneously receive and consume the services provided by the Company as it performs. The transaction price is based on the consideration specified in the contract with the customer and contains fixed and variable consideration. In general, the fixed consideration component of a contract represents reimbursement for facility and equipment costs incurred to satisfy the performance obligation and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. The variable consideration component is comprised of cost reimbursement per unit pricing for time and pricing for materials used and is determined based on cost plus a mark-up for hours of services provided and materials used and is recognized over time based on the level of activity volume.

Other services include primarily customs clearance services performed as a single performance obligation. The Company recognizes revenue from this performance obligation at a point in time, which is the completion of the services. Duties and taxes collected from the customer and paid to the customs agent on behalf of the customers are excluded from revenue.

The Company uses independent ~~registered public accounting firm~~contractors and third-party carriers in the performance of its transportation services. The Company evaluates who controls the transportation services to determine whether its performance obligation is to transfer services to the customer or to arrange for services to be provided by another party. The Company determined it acts as the principal for its transportation services performance obligation since it is in control of establishing the prices for the specified services, managing all aspects of the shipments process and assuming the risk of loss for delivery and collection. Such transportation services revenue is presented on a gross basis in the statement of comprehensive income.

A summary of the Company’s gross revenues disaggregated by major service lines and geographic markets (reportable segments), and timing of revenue recognition for the year ended June 30, 2019, respectively, are as follows:

⁽¹⁾Value added services includes warehouse and distribution services, and other services.

The Company has elected to not disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of the end of the period as the Company’s contracts with its transportation customers have an expected duration of one year or less.

For the performance obligation to transfer warehouse and distribution services in contracts with customers, revenue is recognized in the amount for which the Company has the right to invoice the customer, as this amount corresponds directly with the value provided to the customer for the Company’s performance completed to date.

The Company also applies the practical expedient that permits the recognition of employee sales commissions related to transportation services as an expense when incurred since the amortization period of such costs is less than one year. These costs are included in ~~this report commencing at page F-1.~~the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

I~~TEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE~~Contract Assets

~~None.~~Contract assets represent amounts for which the Company has the right to consideration for the services provided while a shipment is still in-transit but for which it has not yet completed the performance obligation or has not yet invoiced the customer. Upon completion of the performance obligations, which can vary in duration based upon the method of transport and billing the customer, these amounts become classified within accounts receivable.

The Company enters into contractual arrangements with independent agents that operate, on behalf of the Company, an office in a specific location that engages primarily in arranging, domestic and international, transportation services. In return, the independent agent is compensated through the payment of sales commissions, which are based on individual shipments. The Company accrues the independent agent’s commission obligation ratably as the goods are transferred to the customer.

The Company has an employee savings plan under which the Company provides safe harbor matching contributions. For the years ended June 30, 2019, and 2018, the Company’s contributions under the plan were $1,327 and $862, respectively.

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

The Company records a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. Interest and penalties, if any, are recorded as a component of interest expense or other expense, respectively.

The Company grants restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock options to certain directors, officers and employees. The Company accounts for share-based compensation as equity awards such that compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is expensed ratably over the vesting period. The fair value of restricted stock is the market price as of the grant date, and the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment about, among other things, stock volatility, the expected life of the award, and other inputs. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. The Company issues new shares of common stock to satisfy exercises and vesting of awards granted under its stock plans.

Basic income per common share is computed by dividing net income allocable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income per common share is computed by dividing net income allocable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares, such as restricted stock awards and stock options, had been issued and were considered dilutive. Net income allocable to common stockholders is after consideration for preferred stock dividends, whether or not declared, and preferred stock redemption.

For the Company’s foreign subsidiaries that prepare financial statements in currencies other than U.S. dollars, the local currency is the functional currency. All assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates and all income statement amounts are translated at the weighted average rates for the period. Translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. Gains and losses on transactions of monetary items denominated in a foreign currency are recognized in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified in the consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

The computations of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted income per share are as follows:

~~An evaluation~~amortization expenses related to technology and equipment were $5,200 and $4,490 for the years ended June 30, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Computer software includes approximately $722 and $1,168 of ~~the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as such term is defined~~software currently in ~~Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act~~development as of June 30, ~~2017, was carried out by our management under the supervision~~2019 and ~~with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)~~2018, respectively. Net technology and ~~Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that,~~equipment obtained through capital leases is $3,862 as of June 30, ~~2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under~~2019.

The table below reflects the ~~Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified~~changes in the ~~SEC rules~~carrying amounts of goodwill for the years ending June 30, 2019 and ~~forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.~~2018:

~~Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)~~Other intangible assets consist of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on management’s assessment based on the criteria of the COSO, we concluded that,following as of June 30, ~~2017, our internal control over financial reporting is effective at~~2019 and 2018:

Amortization expense amounted to $10,009 and $9,899 for the ~~reasonable assurance level.~~

Peterson Sullivan LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017, which is set forth on page ~~F-2~~ ~~of this Form 10-K.~~

~~There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter~~years ended June 30, ~~2017 that have materially affected, or~~2019, and 2018, respectively. Future amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years ending June 30 are ~~reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.~~

Future maturities of notes payable for each of the next five fiscal years ending June 30 and thereafter are as follows:

The Company has a $75,000 senior credit facility (the “Senior Credit Facility”) with Bank of America, N.A. (the “Lender”) on its own behalf and as agent to the other lenders named therein, currently consisting of the Bank of Montreal (as the initial member of the syndicate under such loan), pursuant to a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement. The Senior Credit Facility includes a $3,500 sublimit to support letters of credit and matures June 14, 2022.

Borrowings accrue interest based on the Company’s average daily availability at the Lender’s base rate plus 0.25% to 0.75% or LIBOR plus 1.25% to 1.75%. The Senior Credit Facility provides for advances of up to 85% of the eligible Canadian and domestic accounts receivable, 75% of eligible accrued but unbilled domestic receivables and eligible foreign accounts receivable, all of which are subject to certain sub-limits, reserves and reductions. The Senior Credit Facility is collateralized by a first-priority security interest in all of the assets of the U.S. co-borrowers, a first-priority security interest in all of the accounts receivable and associated assets of the Canadian co-borrowers (the “Canadian A/R Assets”) and a second-priority security interest on the other assets of the Canadian borrowers.

Borrowings are available to fund future acquisitions, capital expenditures, repurchase of Company stock or for other corporate purposes. The terms of the Senior Credit Facility are subject to customary financial and operational covenants, including covenants that may limit or restrict the ability to, among other things, borrow under the Senior Credit Facility, incur indebtedness from other lenders, and make acquisitions. As of June 30, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants.

As of June 30, 2019, based on available collateral and outstanding letter of credit commitments, there was $51,253 available for borrowing under the Senior Credit Facility.

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Wheels International Inc. (“Wheels”), Wheels obtained a CAD$29,000 senior secured Canadian term loan from Integrated Private Debt Fund IV LP (“IPD IV”) pursuant to a CAD$29,000,000 Credit Facilities Loan Agreement. The Company and its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries are guarantors of the Wheels obligations thereunder. The loan matures on April 1, 2024 and accrues interest at a rate of 6.65% per annum. The Company is required to maintain five months interest in a debt service reserve account to be controlled by IPD IV. The amount of approximately $600 is recorded as deposits and other assets in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company made interest-only payments for the first 12 months followed by monthly principal and interest payments of CAD$390 that will be paid through maturity.

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Lomas, Wheels obtained a CAD$10,000 senior secured Canadian term loan from Integrated Private Debt Fund V LP pursuant to a CAD$10,000,000 Credit Facilities Loan Agreement. The Company and its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries are guarantors of the Wheels obligations thereunder. The loan matures on June 1, 2024 and accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.65% per annum. The loan repayment consists of monthly principal and interest payments of CAD$149.

The loans may be prepaid in whole at any time providing the Company gives at least 30 days prior written notice and pays the difference between (i) the present value of the loan interest and the principal payments foregone discounted at the Government of Canada Bond Yield for the term from the date of prepayment to the maturity date, and (ii) the face value of the principal amount being prepaid.

In April 2018, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Clipper Exxpress Company, entered into a lease financing agreement with Bank of America Leasing & Capital, LLC, for the lease of up to 100 refrigerated trailers with the aggregate acquisition cost not to exceed $5,000 through December 31, 2018. On October 30, 2018, the Company completed acquiring trailer equipment under the agreement and had financed 57 trailers costing $3,112. The term of the lease shall be 84 months from October 30, 2018, and as lessee, the Company will be obligated to purchase the trailers at the end of the lease for a nominal amount. Capital lease obligations are included in other debt.

The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value at $0.001 per share and 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 per share.

At June 30, 2018, the Company had 839,200 shares of 9.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Shares”) outstanding with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share that were issued on December 20, 2013. Net proceeds received from the Series A Preferred Shares issuance totaled approximately $19,320. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Shares were cumulative from the date of original issue and were payable on January 31, April 30, July 31 and October 31, as and if declared by the Company’s board of directors. Commencing on December 20, 2018, the Series A Preferred Shares were redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether declared).

On December 21, 2018, the Company redeemed all its Series A Preferred Shares for an aggregated price of $20,980 and charged to retained earnings $1,659 for the excess of consideration paid over carrying value of preferred stock on redemption. Dividends paid to prior holders of Series A Preferred Shares for the year ended June 30, 2019 was $1.5536 per share, totaling $1,303.

In March 2018, the Company’s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock through December 31, 2019. There have been no purchases of common stock executed under the repurchase program through the date of this filing. Under the stock repurchase program, the Company is authorized to repurchase, from time-to-time, shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market at prevailing market prices or through privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. The program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares and could be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice.

RLP is owned 40% by RGL and 60% by RCP, a company for which the Chief Executive Officer of the Company is the sole member. RLP is a certified minority business enterprise that was formed for the purpose of providing the Company with a national accounts strategy to pursue corporate and government accounts with diversity initiatives. RCP’s ownership interest entitles it to a majority of the profits and distributable cash, if any, generated by RLP. The operations of RLP are intended to provide certain benefits to the Company, including expanding the scope of services offered by the Company and participating in supplier diversity programs not otherwise available to the Company. In the course of evaluating and approving the ownership structure, operations and economics emanating from RLP, a committee consisting of the independent Board member of the Company, considered, among other factors, the significant benefits provided to the Company through association with a minority business enterprise, particularly as many of the Company’s largest current and potential customers have a need for diversity offerings. In addition, the committee concluded that the economic relationship with RLP was on terms no less favorable to the Company than terms generally available from unaffiliated third-parties.

RLP recorded profits of $1,722 and $409 for the years ended June 30, 2019, and 2018, respectively. RCP’s distributable share was $1,034 and $245 for the years ended June 30, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The non-controlling interest recorded as a reduction of net income available to common stockholders in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income represents RCP’s distributive share.

~~ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE~~The accounting guidance for fair value, among other things, defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The framework for measuring fair value consists of a three-level valuation hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value based upon whether such inputs are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions made by the reporting entity. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or

liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. The fair value measurement level within the hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

The following table sets forth ~~information concerning our executive officers and directors. Each~~the Company’s financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

The following table provides a reconciliation of the executive officers will serve until his or her successor is appointed by our Board of Directors or such executive officer’s earlier resignation or removal. Each of the directors will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or such director’s earlier resignation or removal.financial liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

The Company has contingent obligations to transfer cash payments and equity shares to former shareholders of ~~Directors~~

~~We believe that our Board should be composed of individuals~~acquired operations in conjunction with ~~sophistication~~certain acquisitions if specified operating results and ~~experience in many substantive areas that impact our business. We believe that experience, qualifications, or skills~~financial objectives are met over the next four fiscal years. Contingent consideration is measured quarterly at fair value, and any change in the ~~following areas~~fair value of the contingent liability is included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The Company recorded a decrease to contingent consideration of $1,207, and a decrease of $1,176 for the years ended June 30, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The changes in the current and prior periods are ~~most important: accounting~~principally attributable to net decrease in management’s estimates of future earn-out payments through the remainder of its earn-out periods.

The Company uses projected future financial results based on recent and ~~finance; strategic planning; logistics and operations, human resources and development practices; and board practices of other corporations. These areas are in addition~~historical data to value the anticipated future earn-out payments. To calculate fair value, the future earn-out payments were then discounted using Level 3 inputs. The Company has classified the contingent consideration as Level 3 due to the ~~personal qualifications described~~lack of relevant observable market data over fair value inputs. The Company believes the discount rate used to discount the earn-out payments reflects market participant assumptions. Changes in ~~this section. We believe~~assumptions and operating results could have a significant impact on the earn-out amount, up to a maximum of $8,920 through earn-

out periods measured through August 2021, although there are no maximums on certain earn-out payments. Contingent consideration is net of advances of earn-out payments of $488, includes approximately $375 that ~~all~~was earned during fiscal year 2019 and is payable November 2019.

The carrying values of the Company’s cash, receivables, contract assets, accounts payable, commissions payable, accrued expenses, and the income tax receivable and payable approximate the fair values due to the relatively short maturities of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s credit facility, notes payable and other long-term liabilities would not differ significantly from fair value (based on Level 2 inputs) if recalculated based on current ~~Board members possess~~interest rates.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Act contains many significant changes to the ~~professional~~U.S. federal income tax laws. The primary impact of the Act in fiscal year 2018 was a reduction of the federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 28.1% (average rate of 35% for the first half of fiscal year 2018 and ~~personal qualifications necessary~~21% for ~~board service,~~the second half of fiscal year 2018, consistent with Internal Revenue Code Section 15). Additionally, the Act required companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred and ~~have highlighted particularly noteworthy attributes~~creates a new tax on certain foreign-sourced earnings. The deferred income tax benefit for ~~each Board member~~the year ended June 30, 2019 includes a benefit of $2,378 recognized from the remeasurement of federal deferred tax liabilities resulting from the permanent reduction in the ~~individual biographies below.~~ U.S. statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.

The ~~principal occupation and business experience, for at least the past five years,~~significant components of ~~each current director is~~income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:

~~Bohn H. Crain.~~ Mr. Crain has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors since October 2005. Mr. Crain brings approximately 25 years of industry and capital markets experience in transportation and logistics. Since January 2005, Mr. Crain has served as the Managing Member of Radiant Capital Partners, LLC, an entity he formed to execute a consolidation strategy in the transportation and logistics sector. Prior to founding Radiant, Mr. Crain served as the Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of Stonepath Group, Inc. from January 2002 until December 2004. In 2001, Mr. Crain served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Schneider Logistics, Inc., a third-party logistics company, and from 2000 to 2001 he served as the Vice President and Treasurer of Florida East Coast Industries, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange listed company engaged in railroad and real estate businesses. Between 1989 and 2000, Mr. Crain held various vice president and treasury positions for CSX Corp., a Fortune 500 transportation company listed

The following table reconciles income taxes based on the ~~New York Stock Exchange,~~U.S. statutory tax rate to the Company’s income tax expense:

Significant components of deferred tax assets and ~~several of its subsidiaries. He also serves on~~liabilities are as follows:

The Company’s effective tax rate for the ~~Board of Trustees~~year ended June 30, 2019 is higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes. The Company’s effective tax rate for ~~Eastside Preparatory School in Bellevue, Washington. Mr. Crain earned a Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration with an emphasis in Accounting~~the year ended June 30, 2018 is lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to the provisional deferred income tax benefit resulting from the ~~University~~remeasurement of ~~Texas. As~~federal deferred tax liability due to the Act, as well as state and foreign income taxes. The Company does not have any uncertain tax positions and has a ~~result~~federal net operating loss carryover of ~~these~~approximately $726 due to expire primarily through the 2027 fiscal year and ~~other professional experiences, Mr. Crain possesses particular knowledge~~a foreign net operating loss carryover of approximately $1,730 due to expire through the 2038 fiscal year.

The Company and ~~experience~~its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated Federal income tax return. The Company also files unitary or separate returns in ~~logistics management, industry trends, business operations~~various state, local and ~~accounting~~non-U.S. jurisdictions based on state, local and non-U.S. filing requirements. Tax years that ~~strengthen~~remain subject to examination by U.S. authorities are the ~~Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.~~

~~Jack Edwards.~~ ~~Mr. Edwards was appointed as a director in~~years ended June 30, 2016 through June 30, 2019. Tax years that remain subject to examination by state authorities are the years ended June 30, 2015 through June 30, 2019. Tax years that remain subject to examination by non-U.S. authorities are the periods ended December 2011. Mr. Edwards is an independent business executive who since 2002 has been providing strategic, investment and operational advisory services to a broad range of corporate and private equity clients and boards. From 200131, 2014 through 2002, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response, Inc., a provider of private ambulatory services. Prior to this, Mr. Edwards served as the President and Chief Executive Officer at a variety of logistics and freight-forwarding companies, including Danzas Corporation and ITEL Transportation Group. Previously, he held senior executive positions at Circle International, American President Lines and The Southern Pacific Transportation Company. Mr. Edwards has served as a director of several publicly traded corporations, including Laidlaw Inc. (NYSE), ITEL Corp. (NYSE) and Sun Gro Horticulture Canada Ltd. (TSX) where he served as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Edwards currently serves as a director for Adelante Media Group and Zonar Systems. Mr. Edwards received a Bachelor of Science in Food Science and TechnologyJune 30, 2019. Occasionally acquired entities have tax years that differ from the University of California, Davis, and a Masters of Business Administration in Marketing from the University of Oregon. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Edwards possesses particular knowledge and experience in the transportation and logistics industry, along with business combinations and financial management, that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.

~~Richard P. Palmieri.~~ Mr. Palmieri was appointed as a director in March 2014. He has been the Managing Director of ANR Partners, LLC, a Philadelphia-based management and financial consulting firm, since 2012. Prior to this, from 2007 to 2012, Mr. Palmieri served as the President and CEO of Canon Financial Services, Inc., the captive finance subsidiary of Canon USA. From 2003 to 2006, he was the President and CEO of Schneider Financial Services, a financial services subsidiary of a large, privately held transportation and logistics company. From 1998 to 2003, he served as a Managing Director and co-head of the Transportation and Logistics investment banking group at Credit Suisse Group. From 1993 to 1998, he served as a Managing Director and co-head of the Transportation and Logistics investment banking group at Deutsche Securities. Before this, he served in various finance and management positions at several large companies, including Whirlpool Financial Corporation, PacificCorp Credit, Commercial Credit Company and ~~GE Capital. Mr. Palmieri received a Bachelor~~are still open under the relevant statute of ~~Science in Accounting from Wagner College. As a result of these~~limitations and other professional experiences, Mr. Palmieri possesses particular knowledge and experience in logistics and financial management that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.therefore are subject to potential adjustment.

~~Michael Gould.~~ Mr. Gould was appointed as a director in July 2016. Since May 2015, Mr. Gould has served as Senior Vice President, Oracle Consulting in North America at Oracle Corporation. Prior to this, from 2008 to May 2015, Mr. Gould served as the Vice President and General Manager for the Americas Technology Services Consulting Organization for Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”). Also while at HP, he served as Vice President for Americas Alliances. Prior to HP, Mr. Gould served in various roles at Oracle, BearingPoint and BEA. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University and a Masters in Business Administration from Santa Clara University. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Gould possesses particular knowledge and experience in management and technology that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills and experience.

~~Arnold Goldstein.~~ Mr. Goldstein has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer since June 30, 2016. Mr. Goldstein also has significant experience within the transportation industry, having served as Chief Operating Officer of Service by Air, which was acquired by the Company in June 2015, and in various leadership roles at Hellman World Wide Logistics from May 2006 to June 2015. Mr. Goldstein earned a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from the University of Rhode Island and a Masters of Business Administration from Bryant University.

~~Todd E. Macomber.~~ Mr. Macomber has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since March 2011, as our Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since August 2010, and as our Vice President and Corporate Controller since December 2007. Prior to joining us, Mr. Macomber served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of BiotraceThe Company’s Canadian Subsidiary, Wheels International, Inc., ~~a subsidiary~~is currently under examination by the Canada Revenue Agency for the year 2015. The amount of ~~Biotrace International PLC, an industrial microbiology company listed on the London Stock Exchange. Mr. Macomber earned a Bachelor of Arts, emphasis in Accounting from Seattle University.~~

~~Joseph Bento.~~ ~~Mr. Bento joined~~potential exposure, if any, is unknown and there is no reason to believe the Company in January 2016 and served as Senior Vice President of Operations until his appointment to Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Freight Forwarding Operations in mid-2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bento served inshould record a variety of significant roles within the transportation industry, including, from September 2012 to April 2016, as the Chief Sales Officer of SEKO Logistics; and from 1998 to 2012, in various leadership roles at Eagle Global Logistics and its successor, CEVA Logistics. Mr. Bento earned a Bachelor of Science in Finance from California State University – Long Beach.reserve.

~~Tim Boyce~~ has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Rail and Truck Brokerage Operations since our acquisition of Wheels in April 2015. He came to Wheels on February 1, 2012 to serve as the Executive Vice President - Marketing and Sales, and was promoted to Chief Marketing Officer shortly thereafter. From October 2013 until April 2015, he served as President of Wheels’ U.S. operations. Prior to joining Wheels, Mr. Boyce was employed by Canadian Pacific Railway where he served in various senior roles including General Manager - Sales and Marketing Domestic Intermodal. Prior to this, he was the Vice President - Sales and Marketing with Canpar Transport Ltd, a leading Canadian courier company, and TST (formerly TNT) Overland Express, a leading Canadian based LTL company serving customers across North America.

~~The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the captions “Corporate Governance” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” is incorporated herein by reference.~~

~~The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the captions “Executive Compensation” is incorporated herein by reference.~~

I~~TEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS~~

The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the captions “Principal Stockholders” and “Executive Compensation — Securities authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” is incorporated herein by reference.

The Company has two stock-based plans: the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2012 Stock Option and Performance Award Plan. Each plan authorizes the granting of up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The plans provide for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units. Restricted stock awards and units are equivalent to one share of common stock and generally vest after three years. The Company does not plan to make additional grants under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.

During the years ended, June 30, 2019, and 2018 the Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to stock awards of $807 and $550, respectively. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had approximately $1,280 of total unrecognized share-based compensation cost. Such costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.80 years.

~~ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE~~Stock Options

Stock options are granted at exercise prices equal to the fair value of the common stock at the date of the grant and have a term of 10 years. Generally, grants under each plan vest 20% annually over a five-year period from the date of grant. For the years ended June 30, 2019, and 2018, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to stock options of $805 and $964, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $1,037 and $1,299, respectively for the years ended June 30, 2019, and 2018. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had approximately $660 of total unrecognized share-based compensation cost. Such costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.29 years.

The ~~information~~following table summarizes stock option activity under the plans:

The following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable options by price range as of June 30, 2019:

	Outstanding Options								Exercisable Options
Exercise Prices	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In thousands)		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In thousands)
$0.00 - $0.49		100,000	$	0.28		0.10	$	586		100,000	$	0.28		0.10	$	586
$0.50 - $0.99		11,832		0.60		1.40		66		11,832		0.60		1.40		66
$1.00 - $1.49		104,651		1.30		1.67		506		104,651		1.30		1.67		507
$1.50 - $1.99		216,164		1.87		3.92		923		216,164		1.87		3.92		923
$2.00 - $2.49		469,976		2.28		2.94		1,813		469,976		2.28		2.94		1,813
$2.50 - $2.99		60,000		2.75		4.67		203		60,000		2.75		4.67		203
$3.00 - $3.49		491,174		3.24		5.99		1,425		307,848		3.21		5.67		903
$3.50 - $3.99		215,000		3.86		5.92		490		133,000		3.86		5.94		303
$4.00 - $4.49		180,938		4.15		5.62		360		138,700		4.14		5.56		277
$4.50 - $4.99		290,144		4.59		5.84		449		220,076		4.59		5.75		342
$5.00 - $5.49		83,214		5.28		5.86		72		66,519		5.28		5.86		57
$5.50 - $5.99		200,000		5.63		5.76		102		160,000		5.63		5.76		82
$6.00 - $6.49		25,000		6.18		7.86		—		10,000		6.18		7.86		—
$6.50 - $6.99		10,000		6.77		6.08		—		—		—		—		—

		2,458,093	$	3.30		4.69	$	6,995		1,998,766	$	3.11		4.34	$	6,062

The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ~~Proxy Statement set forth~~ordinary course of business. In many claims and actions, it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even reasonably possible or to estimate the size or range of the possible loss. Accordingly, an adverse outcome from such proceedings could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Legal expenses are expensed as incurred. A summary of potential material proceedings and litigation is as follows.

Ingrid Barahona v. Accountabilities, Inc. d/b/a/ Accountabilities Staffing, Inc., Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. and DBA Distribution Services, Inc. (Ingrid Barahona California Class Action)

On October 25, 2013, plaintiff Ingrid Barahona filed a purported class action lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California against Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. (“RGL”) and DBA Distribution Services, Inc. (“DBA”, a wholly-owned subsidiary) (collectively referred to as the “Company”) and two third-party staffing companies (collectively with the Company, the “Staffing Defendants”) with whom RGL and DBA contracted for temporary employees. In the lawsuit, Ms. Barahona, on behalf of herself and the putative class, sought damages and penalties under California law, plus interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs, along with equitable remedies, alleging that she and the ~~captions “Corporate Governance”~~putative class were the subject of unfair and unlawful business practices, including certain wage and hour violations relating to, among others, failure to provide meal and rest periods, failure to pay minimum wages and overtime, and failure to reimburse employees for work-related expenses. Ms. Barahona alleged that she was jointly employed by the staffing companies and RGL and DBA. RGL and DBA denied Ms. Barahona’s allegations in their entirety, denied that they were liable to Ms. Barahona or the putative class members in any way, and vigorously defended against these allegations based upon a preliminary evaluation of applicable records and legal standards. If Ms. Barahona were to prevail on her allegations on substantially all claims against the Company, the Company could be liable for uninsured damages in an amount that, while not significant when evaluated against either the Company’s assets or current and expected level of annual earnings, could be material when judged against the Company’s earnings in the particular quarter in which any such damages arose, if at all.

On February 19, 2019, the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss the class action case, which the court granted on March 14, 2019, and subsequently entered judgment in favor of the Company on April 30, 2019. On May 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal, seeking appellate review. The trial judge’s decision to dismiss the case and enter judgment in favor of the Company will be reviewed by the Second District Court of Appeal for the State of California. To date, however, the Court of Appeal has not issued an appellate briefing schedule. At this time, the Company is ~~incorporated herein~~unable to express an opinion as to the likely outcome of the matter.

Minimum future lease payments (excluding the lease payments included in the transition and lease termination liability) under these non-cancelable operating leases for each of the next five fiscal years ending June 30 and thereafter are as follows:

Rent expense amounted to $9,799 and $8,978 for the years ended June 30, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

Lease termination costs consist of expenses related to future rent payments for which the Company no longer intends to receive any economic benefit. A liability is recorded when the Company ceases to use leased space. Lease termination costs are calculated as the present value of lease payments, net of expected sublease income, and the loss on disposition of assets. Lease termination costs consist of consolidation of facilities that occurred in Toronto, and in Newark, New Jersey.

In 2015, following the acquisition of Service by ~~reference.~~Air, Inc., the Company identified non-recurring personnel costs expected to be eliminated in connection with the winding down of their historical back-office operations. Additionally, the Company expensed the expected amount of retention bonuses over the requisite service period. Additional retention costs are not expected.

The Company’s agreements with respect to previous acquisitions contain future consideration provisions which provide for the selling equity owners to receive additional consideration if specified operating objectives and financial results are achieved in future periods. Earn-out payments are generally due annually on November 1^st, and 90 days following the quarter of the final earn-out period for each respective acquisition.

~~ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES~~The following table represents the estimated undiscounted earn-out payments to be paid during the year ended June 30, 2020 (none in future periods):

⁽¹⁾The Company generally has the right but not the obligation to satisfy a portion of the earn-out payments in stock.

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions regarding allocation of resources and assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker is the Chief Executive Officer. The Company has two operating segments: United States and Canada.

The ~~information~~Company evaluates the performance of the segments primarily based on their respective revenues, net revenues and income from operations. Accordingly, capital expenditures and total assets are not reported in segment results. In addition, the ~~Proxy Statement set forth under~~Company includes the ~~captions “Principal Accounting Fees~~costs of the Company’s executives, board of directors, professional services such as legal and ~~Services” is incorporated herein by reference.~~consulting, amortization of intangible assets and certain other corporate costs associated with operating as a public company as Corporate.

Year Ended June 30, 2019 (In thousands)	United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations			Total
Revenues	$	779,671		$	111,280		$	(434	)	$	890,517
Net revenues ⁽¹⁾		198,097			32,004			—			230,101
Income (loss) from operations		30,682			9,715			(15,678	)		24,719
Other income (expense)		521			(87	)		(2,973	)		(2,539	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		31,203			9,628			(18,651	)		22,180
Depreciation and amortization		3,623			1,560			10,026			15,209
Technology and equipment, net		14,886			5,241			—			20,127
Transition and lease termination costs		(11	)		—			—			(11	)
Transition and lease termination liability		194			68			—			262
Goodwill		43,991			21,398			—			65,389

Year Ended June 30, 2018 (In thousands)
Revenues	$	735,401		$	108,279		$	(1,263	)	$	842,417
Net revenues ⁽¹⁾		174,704			25,441			—			200,145
Income (loss) from operations		26,440			1,556			(14,815	)		13,181
Other income (expense)		430			(30	)		(3,075	)		(2,675	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		26,870			1,526			(17,890	)		10,506
Depreciation and amortization		2,650			1,252			10,487			14,389
Technology and equipment, net		15,113			3,453			—			18,566
Transition and lease termination costs		107			69			—			176
Transition and lease termination liability		371			1,014			—			1,385
Goodwill		43,991			21,398			—			65,389

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

~~Consolidated Balance Sheets~~the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as of June 30, ~~2017 and 2016~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015~~

~~All schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto, or because it is not required.~~

~~See exhibits listed~~2019, was carried out by our management under the ~~Exhibit Index below.~~

~~Incorporated by Reference~~

Exhibit
Number

~~Description~~

Filed
Herewith

~~Form~~

Period
Ending

~~Exhibit~~

Filing
Date

~~23.1~~

~~Consent of Peterson Sullivan LLP~~

~~31.1~~

~~Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~31.2~~

~~Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~32.1~~

~~Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~101.INS~~

~~XBRL Instance~~

~~101.SCH~~

~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema~~

~~101.CAL~~

~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation~~

~~101.DEF~~

~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition~~

~~101.LAB~~

~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label~~

~~101.PRE~~

~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation~~

~~Pursuant to~~supervision and with the ~~requirements~~participation of ~~Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.~~

~~Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant~~our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and ~~in the capacities~~Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and ~~on the dates indicated.~~

~~We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Radiant Logistics, Inc. (“the Company”)~~CFO concluded that, as of June 30, ~~2017~~2019, our disclosure controls and ~~2016,~~procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the ~~related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years~~time periods specified in the ~~three-year period ended June 30, 2017. We also have audited the Company’s~~SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of ~~June 30, 2017, based on~~the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In making this assessment, we used the criteria ~~established in~~ ~~Internal Control—Integrated Framework~~ ~~issued~~set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in ~~the accompanying Management’s Report on~~ Internal Control ~~over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion~~— Integrated Framework (2013). Based on ~~these financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.~~

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal controlmanagement’s assessment based on the ~~assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures~~criteria of COSO, we concluded that, as ~~we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that~~of June 30, 2019, our ~~audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.~~

~~A company’s~~ internal control over financial reporting is ~~a process~~effective, at the reasonable assurance level.

Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting ~~principles. A company’s~~principles in the U.S. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures ~~that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)~~ which:

Peterson Sullivan LLP, an independent registered public accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effectfirm has issued an attestation report on ~~the financial statements.~~

~~Because of its inherent limitations,~~our internal control over financial reporting, ~~may~~which is set forth on page 35 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

There have not ~~prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of~~been any ~~evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of~~ changes in ~~conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.~~

In our ~~opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Radiant Logistics, Inc. as of~~ ~~June 30, 2017 and 2016,~~ ~~and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended~~ ~~June 30, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, Radiant Logistics, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective~~ internal control over financial reporting ~~as of~~ ~~June 30, 2017, based on criteria established~~(as defined in ~~Internal Control—Integrated Framework~~ ~~issued by~~Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the ~~COSO.~~

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

June 30,

2017

2016

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$
5,808

$
4,768

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,599 and $1,806, respectively

116,327

101,035

Employee and other receivables

251

635

Income tax deposit

432

1,525

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

6,902

5,410

Total current assets

129,720

113,373

Technology and equipment, net

15,227

12,453

Acquired intangibles, net

74,729

71,941

Goodwill

66,779

62,888

Deposits and other assets

3,085

2,814

Total long-term assets

144,593

137,643

Total assets

$
289,540

$
263,469

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued transportation costs

$
85,490

$
75,071

Commissions payable

10,843

8,280

Other accrued costs

4,778

5,331

Due to former shareholders of acquired operations

—

50

Current portion of notes payable

3,382

2,416

Current portion of contingent consideration

4,130

3,387

Current portion of transition and lease termination liability

1,210

1,838

Other current liabilities

143

138

Total current liabilities

109,976

96,511

Notes payable, net of current portion

37,040

28,903

Contingent consideration, net of current portion

5,790

4,098

Transition and lease termination liability, net of current portion

804

658

Deferred rent liability

857

851

Deferred tax liability

10,826

12,525

Other long-term liabilities

782

742

Total long-term liabilities

56,099

47,777

Total liabilities

166,075

144,288

Stockholders' equity:

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; 839,200 shares issued and
outstanding, liquidation preference of $20,980

1

1

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 49,177,215 and 48,857,506
shares issued, and 49,085,417 and 48,857,506 shares outstanding, respectively

30

30

Additional paid-in capital

116,172

114,392

Treasury stock, at cost, 91,798 and 0 shares, respectively

(253
)

—

Deferred compensation

—

(1
)
Retained earnings

7,397

4,581

Accumulated other comprehensive income

65

98

Total Radiant Logistics, Inc. stockholders’ equity

123,412

119,101

Non-controlling interest

53

80

Total stockholders’ equity

123,465

119,181

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$
289,540

$
263,469

~~The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Year Ended June 30,

2017

2016

2015

Revenues

$
777,613

$
782,579

$
502,665

Cost of transportation

582,977

595,918

378,942

Net revenues

194,636

186,661

123,723

Operating partner commissions

90,207

84,475

60,356

Personnel costs

51,930

54,131

34,225

Selling, general and administrative expenses

23,971

25,731

15,384

Depreciation and amortization

12,349

12,033

6,359

Transition and lease termination costs

2,260

5,945

770

Impairment of acquired intangible assets

—

3,680

—

Change in contingent consideration

3,431

1,003

(3,921
)
Total operating expenses

184,148

186,998

113,173

Income (loss) from operations

10,488

(337
)

10,550

Other income (expense):

Interest income

25

47

17

Interest expense

(2,522
)

(4,919
)

(1,873
)
Loss on write-off of loan fees

—

(1,180
)

—

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

222

700

(739
)
Other

379

350

16

Total other expense:

(1,896
)

(5,002
)

(2,579
)

Income (loss) before income tax expense

8,592

(5,339
)

7,971

Income tax benefit (expense)

(3,673
)

1,886

(2,016
)

Net income (loss)

4,919

(3,453
)

5,955

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

(57
)

(66
)

(80
)

Net income (loss) attributable to Radiant Logistics, Inc.

4,862

(3,519
)

5,875

Less: Preferred stock dividends

(2,046
)

(2,046
)

(2,046
)

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

$
2,816

$
(5,565
)

$
3,829

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Foreign currency translation gain (loss)

(33
)

493

(395
)
Comprehensive income (loss)

$
2,783

$
(5,072
)

$
3,434

Net income (loss) per common share:

Basic

$
0.06

$
(0.11
)

$
0.11

Diluted

$
0.06

$
(0.11
)

$
0.10

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Basic shares

48,840,797

48,413,361

36,446,778

Diluted shares

49,993,595

48,413,361

38,021,511

~~The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(In thousands, except share data)
Preferred Stock

Common Stock

Additional
Paid-in

Treasury

Deferred

Retained

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive

Non-
Controlling

Total
Stockholders’

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Capital

Stock

Compensation

Earnings

Income

Interest

Equity

Balance as of June 30, 2014

839,200

$
1

34,326,308

$
16

$
34,559

$
—

$
(9
)

$
6,317

$
—

$
41

$
40,925

Issuance of common stock to former
   shareholders of acquired operations

—

—

7,039,690

7

39,409

—

—

—

—

—

39,416

Issuance of common stock to Operating
   Partner

—

—

56,819

—

109

—

—

—

—

—

109

Share-based compensation

—

—

—

—

1,110

—

—

—

—

—

1,110

Amortization of deferred compensation

—

—

—

—

—

—

5

—

—

—

5

Cashless exercise of stock options

—

—

1,140,407

1

(3,784
)

—

—

—

—

—

(3,783
)
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

—

—

—

—

3,256

—

—

—

—

—

3,256

Preferred dividends paid

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(2,046
)

—

—

(2,046
)
Distribution to non-controlling interest

—

—

—

��
—

—

—

—

—

—

(59
)

(59
)
Net income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

5,875

—

80

5,955

Comprehensive loss

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(395
)

—

(395
)

Balance as of June 30, 2015

839,200

$
1

42,563,224

$
24

$
74,659

$
—

$
(4
)

$
10,146

$
(395
)

$
62

$
84,493

Issuance of common stock at $6.75 per
   share, net of underwriting and offering
   costs of $2,970

—

—

6,133,334

6

38,424

—

—

—

—

—

38,430

Issuance of common stock to former
   shareholders of acquired operations

—

—

7,385

—

31

—

—

—

—

—

31

Share-based compensation

—

—

—

—

1,404

—

—

—

—

—

1,404

Amortization of deferred compensation

—

—

—

—

—

—

3

—

—

—

3

Cashless exercise of stock options

—

—

153,949

—

(264
)

—

—

—

—

—

(264
)
Cancellation of restricted stock awards

—

—

(386
)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

—

—

—

—

138

—

—

—

—

—

138

Preferred dividends paid

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(2,046
)

—

—

(2,046
)
Distribution to non-controlling interest

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(48
)

(48
)
Net income (loss)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(3,519
)

—

66

(3,453
)
Comprehensive income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

493

—

493

Balance as of June 30, 2016

839,200

$
1

48,857,506

$
30

$
114,392

$
—

$
(1
)

$
4,581

$
98

$
80

$
119,181

Issuance of common stock to former
   shareholders of acquired operations

—

—

160,329

—

905

—

—

—

—

—

905

Repurchase of common stock

—

—

(91,798
)

—

—

(253
)

—

—

—

—

(253
)
Share-based compensation

—

—

—

—

1,303

—

—

—

—

—

1,303

Amortization of deferred compensation

—

—

—

—

—

—

1

—

—

—

1

Cashless exercise of stock options

—

—

159,380

—

(428
)

—

—

—

—

—

(428
)
Preferred dividends paid

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(2,046
)

—

—

(2,046
)
Distribution to non-controlling interest

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(84
)

(84
)
Net income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

4,862

—

57

4,919

Comprehensive income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(33
)

—

(33
)
Balance as of June 30, 2017

839,200

$
1

49,085,417

$
30

$
116,172

$
(253
)

$
—

$
7,397

$
65

$
53

$
123,465

~~The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

(In thousands)

Year Ended June 30,

2017

2016

2015

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net income (loss)

$
4,919

$
(3,453
)

$
5,955

ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

share-based compensation expense

1,304

1,407

1,115

amortization of intangibles

8,512

8,560

5,394

depreciation and leasehold amortization

3,837

3,473

965

deferred income tax benefit

(1,713
)

(3,134
)

(1,756
)
amortization of loan fees

317

388

145

change in contingent consideration

3,431

1,003

(3,921
)
loss on impairment of acquired intangible assets

—

3,680

—

loss on write-off of loan fees

—

1,180

—

transition and lease termination costs

721

3,537

524

loss (gain) on disposal of technology and equipment

(29
)

42

56

change in (recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts

(207
)

255

(170
)
CHANGE IN OPERATING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES:

accounts receivable

(15,102
)

25,684

(3,289
)
employee and other receivables

384

(525
)

140

income tax deposit

1,089

710

(4,252
)
prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets

(1,463
)

431

(691
)
accounts payable and accrued transportation costs
��

10,411

(16,369
)

779

commissions payable

1,813

(1,170
)

1,438

other accrued costs

(552
)

(2,368
)

464

other liabilities

17

(374
)

(349
)
deferred rent liability

8

(290
)

247

payments of contingent consideration

(1,645
)

(15
)

—

transition and lease termination liability

(1,201
)

(1,246
)

(743
)
Net cash provided by operating activities

14,851

21,406

2,051

CASH FLOWS USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Acquisitions during the fiscal year, net of cash acquired

(11,515
)

(800
)

(44,031
)
Purchases of technology and equipment

(4,935
)

(3,697
)

(4,092
)
Proceeds from sale of technology and equipment

191

810

233

Payments to former shareholders of acquired operations

(50
)

(684
)

—

Net cash used for investing activities

(16,309
)

(4,371
)

(47,890
)

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Proceeds from (repayments to) credit facility, net of credit fees

3,983

(27,942
)

30,566

Proceeds from notes payable

7,575

—

25,548

Payments of loan fees

(471
)

—

(1,353
)
Repayments of notes payable

(2,354
)

(26,285
)

—

Proceeds from stock offering, net of offering costs

—

38,430

—

Proceeds from sale of common stock

—

—

109

Payments of shelf registration costs

—

—

(158
)
Purchases of treasury stock

(253
)

—

—

Payments of contingent consideration

(3,446
)

(1,541
)

(1,457
)
Payments of preferred stock dividends

(2,046
)

(2,046
)

(2,046
)
Distributions to non-controlling interest

(84
)

(48
)

(59
)
Payments of employee tax withholdings related to cashless stock option exercises

(428
)

(264
)

(3,784
)
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

—

138

3,256

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities

2,476

(19,558
)

50,622

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

22

23

(395
)

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

1,040

(2,500
)

4,388

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

4,768

7,268

2,880

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

$
5,808

$
4,768

$
7,268

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Income taxes paid

$
4,720

$
2,506

$
2,764

Interest paid

$
2,196

$
4,522

$
1,596

~~In September 2014,~~Exchange Act) that occurred during the Company issued 16,218 shares of common stock at a fair value of $3.08 per share in satisfaction of $50 of the Trans-Net, Inc. purchase price, resulting in an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital of $50.

~~In November 2014, the Company issued 52,452 shares of common stock at a fair value of $3.84 per share in satisfaction of $201 of the On Time Express, Inc. earn-out payment for the year~~fiscal quarter ended June 30, ~~2014, resulting in a decrease to the current portion of contingent consideration, an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital of $201.~~

In December 2014, the Company issued 43,221 shares of common stock at a fair value of $3.90 per share in satisfaction of $168 of the Don Cameron & Associates, Inc. purchase price, resulting in an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital of $168.

In April 2015, the Company issued 6,900,000 shares of common stock at a fair value of $5.63 per share in satisfaction of the Wheels Group Inc. purchase price, resulting in an increase to common stock of $7 and an increase to additional paid-in capital of $38,840.

In June 2015, the Company issued 27,799 shares of common stock at a fair value of $5.40 per share in satisfaction of $150 of the Highways and Skyways, Inc. purchase price, resulting in an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital of $150.

In December 2015, the Company issued 7,385 shares of common stock at a fair value of $4.23 per share in satisfaction of $31 of the Copper Logistics, Inc. purchase price, resulting in an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital of $31.

In June 2017, the Company issued 84,735 shares of common stock at a fair value of $5.90 per share in satisfaction of $500 of the Dedicated Logistics Technologies, Inc. purchase price, resulting in an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital of $500.

In June 2017, the Company issued 75,594 shares of common stock at a fair value of $5.35 per share in satisfaction of $405 of the Phoenix Cartage and Air Freight, LLC, earn-out payment for the period ended February 28, 2017, resulting in a decrease to the current portion of contingent consideration, an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital of $405.

~~The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

Radiant Logistics, Inc. (the “Company”) operates as a third-party logistics company, providing multi-modal transportation and logistics services primarily to customers based in the United States and Canada. The Company services a large and diversified account base which it supports from an extensive network of over 100 operating locations across North America as well as an integrated international service partner network located in other key markets around the globe. The Company provides these services through a multi-brand network which includes 20 Company-owned offices. As a third-party logistics company, the Company has approximately 10,000 asset-based transportation companies, including motor carriers, railroads, airlines and ocean lines in its carrier network. The Company believes shippers value its services because it is able to objectively arrange the most efficient and cost-effective means, type and provider of transportation service since it is not influenced by the ownership of transportation assets. In addition, the Company’s minimal investment in physical assets affords it the opportunity for a higher return on invested capital and net cash flows than the Company’s asset-based competitors.

Through its operating locations across North America, the Company offers domestic and international air and ocean freight forwarding services and freight brokerage services including truckload services, less than truckload services; and intermodal services, which is the movement of freight in trailers or containers by combination of truck and rail. The Company’s primary business operations involve arranging the shipment, on behalf of its customers, of materials, products, equipment and other goods that are generally larger than shipments handled by integrated carriers of primarily small parcels, such as FedEx, DHL and UPS, including arranging and monitoring all aspects of material flow activity utilizing advanced information technology systems. The Company also provides other value-added logistics services, including customs brokerage, order fulfillment, inventory management and warehousing services to complement its core transportation service offering.

The Company expects to grow its business organically and by completing acquisitions of other companies with complementary geographical and logistics service offerings. The Company’s organic growth strategy will continue to focus on strengthening existing and expanding new customer relationships leveraging the benefit of the Company’s new truck brokerage and intermodal service offerings, while continuing its efforts on the organic build-out of the Company’s network of strategic operating partner locations. In addition, as the Company continues to grow and scale its business, the Company believes that it is creating density in its trade lanes which creates opportunities for the Company to more efficiently source and manage its transportation capacity.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as a single variable interest entity, Radiant Logistics Partners, LLC (“RLP”), which is 40% owned by Radiant Global Logistics, Inc (“RGL”), and 60% owned by Radiant Capital Partners, LLC (“RCP”, see Note 8), an affiliate of Bohn H. Crain, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, whose accounts are included in the consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. All amounts in the consolidated financial statements are stated in thousands, except share and per share amounts.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include revenue recognition, accruals for the cost of purchased transportation, the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, changes in contingent consideration, accounting for the issuance of shares and share-based compensation, the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets and goodwill, and the establishment of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period that they are determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

The carrying values of the Company’s receivables, accounts payable and accrued transportation costs, commissions payable, other accrued costs, and the income tax deposit approximate the fair values due to the relatively short maturities of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s credit facility and other long-term liabilities would not differ significantly from fair value (based on Level 2 inputs) if recalculated based on current interest rates. Contingent consideration attributable to the Company’s acquisitions are reported at fair value using Level 3 inputs.

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are not securing any corporate obligations. Cash balances may at times exceed federally insured limits. Checks issued by the Company2019 that have ~~not yet been presented~~materially affected, or are reasonably likely to the bank for payment are reported as accounts payable and commissions payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Accounts payable and commissions payable includes outstanding payments which had not yet been presented to the bank for payment in the amounts of $9,238 and $4,434 as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

~~The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts that, at times, may exceed federally-insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.~~

The Company’s receivables are recorded when billed and represent claims against third-parties that will be settled in cash. The carrying value of the Company’s receivables, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, represents their estimated net realizable value. The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable on a customer-by-customer basis. The Company records a reserve for bad debts against amounts due in order to reduce the net recognized receivable to an amount the Company believes will be reasonably collected. The reserve is a discretionary amount determined from the analysis of the aging of the accounts receivables, historical experience and knowledge of specific customers.

The Company derives a substantial portion of its revenue through independently-owned strategic operating partner locations operating under various Company brands. Each individual strategic operating partner is responsible for some or all of the bad debt expense related to the underlying customers being serviced by such strategic operating partner. To facilitate this arrangement, certain strategic operating partners are required to maintain a security deposit with the Company that is recognized as a liability in the Company’smaterially affect, our internal control over financial statements. The Company charges each individual strategic operating partner’s bad debt reserve account for any accounts receivable aged beyond 90 days. However, the bad debt reserve account may carry a deficit balance when amounts charged to this reserve exceed amounts otherwise available in the bad debt reserve account. In these circumstances, deficit bad debt reserve accounts, as well as other deficit balances owed to us by strategic operating partners, are recognized as a receivable in the Company’s financial statements. Other strategic operating partners are not required to establish a bad debt reserve, however, they are still responsible for deficits and their strategic operating partner agreements provide that the Company may withhold all or a portion of future commission checks payable to the individual strategic operating partner in satisfaction of any deficit balance. Currently, a number of the Company’s strategic operating partners have a deficit balance in their bad debt reserve account. The Company expects to replenish these funds through the future business operations of these strategic operating partners. However, to the extent any of these strategic operating partners were to cease operations or otherwise be unable to replenish these deficit accounts, the Company would be at risk of loss for any such amount.reporting.

Technology (computer software, hardware, and communications), vehicles, furniture, and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Depreciation is computed using three to fifteen year lives for vehicles, communication, office, furniture, and computer equipment using the straight line method of depreciation. Computer software is depreciated over a three to five year life using the straight line method of depreciation. For leasehold improvements, the cost is amortized over the shorter of the lease term or useful life on a straight line basis. Upon retirement or other disposition of these assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is reflected in other income or expense. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and renewals of minor items are charged to expense as incurred. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized.

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of a business acquired. The Company typically performs its annual goodwill impairment test effective as of April 1 of each year, unless events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred before that time. The Company assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. After assessing qualitative factors, the Company determined that no further testing was necessary. If further testing was necessary, the Company would determine the fair value of each reporting unit, and compare the fair value to the reporting unit’s carrying amount. As of June 30, 2017, management believes there are no indications of impairment.

Acquired intangibles consist of customer related intangibles, trade names and trademarks, and non-compete agreements arising from the Company’s acquisitions. Customer related intangibles are amortized using the straight-line method over a period of up to 10 years, trademarks and trade names are amortized using the straight line method over 15 years, and non-compete agreements are amortized using the straight line method over the term of the underlying agreements.

The Company reviews long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, the Company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, the Company concluded it had a triggering event requiring assessment of customer related intangibles associated with the On-Time Express, Inc. (“On Time”) acquisition due to loss of customers. As a result, the Company reviewed the customer related intangibles and recorded an impairment loss of $3,680 during the second fiscal quarter. The impairment was measured using future discounted cash flows using Level 3 inputs in the fair market hierarchy. Management has performed a review of all long-lived assets and has determined no impairment of the respective carrying value has occurred as of June 30, 2017.

The Company accounts for business combinations using the purchase method of accounting and allocates the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, the estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

The fair values of intangible assets acquired are estimated using a discounted cash flow approach with Level 3 inputs. Under this method, an intangible asset’s fair value is equal to the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows (excess earnings) attributable solely to the intangible asset over its remaining useful life. To calculate fair value, the Company uses risk-adjusted cash flows discounted at rates considered appropriate given the inherent risks associated with each type of asset. The Company believes the level and timing of cash flows appropriately reflects market participant assumptions.

The Company determines the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration payable based on the likelihood of paying the contingent consideration as part of the consideration transferred. The fair value is estimated using projected future operating results and the corresponding future earn-out payments that can be earned upon the achievement of specified operating objectives and financial results by acquired companies using Level 3 inputs and the amounts are then discounted to present value. These liabilities are measured quarterly at fair value, and any change in the contingent liability is included in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company has operating lease commitments for equipment rentals, office space, and warehouse space under non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through November 2022. Rent expense is recognized straight line over the term of the lease. Minimum future lease payments (excluding the lease payments included in the transition and lease termination liability) under these non-cancelable operating leases for each of the next five fiscal years ending June 30 and thereafter are as follows:

~~Rent expense amounted to $5,342, $4,932 and $2,750 for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.~~

Lease termination costs consist of expenses related to future rent payments for which the Company no longer intends to receive any economic benefit. A liability is recorded when the Company ceases to use leased space. Lease termination costs are calculated as the present value of lease payments, net of expected sublease income, and the loss on disposition of assets. Transition costs consist of non-recurring personnel costs that will be eliminated in connection with the winding-down of the historical back-office of Service by Air, Inc. (“SBA”) and other operating locations.

The Company has an employee savings plan under which the Company provides safe harbor matching contributions. For the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s contributions under the plan were $764, $700 and $495, respectively.

Deferred income taxes are reported using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

The Company reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, are recorded as a component of interest expense or other expense, respectively.

The Company is the primary obligor responsible for providing the service desired by the customer and is responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer. At the Company’s sole discretion, it sets the prices charged to its customers, and is not required to obtain approval or consent from any other party in establishing its prices. The Company has multiple suppliers for the services it sells to its customers, and has the absolute and complete discretion and right to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer, including changing the supplier on a shipment-by-shipment basis. In most cases, the Company determines the nature, type, characteristics, and specifications of the service(s) ordered by the customer. The Company also assumes credit risk for the amount billed to the customer.

As a non-asset based carrier, the Company generally does not own transportation assets. The Company generates the major portion of its freight forwarding revenues by purchasing transportation services from direct (asset-based) carriers and reselling those services to its customers. Based upon the terms in the contract of carriage, revenues related to shipments where the Company issues a House Airway Bill or a House Ocean Bill of Lading are recognized at the time the freight is tendered to the direct carrier at origin net of duties and taxes. Costs related to the shipments are also recognized at this same time based upon anticipated margins, contractual arrangements with direct carriers, and other known factors. The estimates are routinely monitored and compared to actual invoiced costs. The estimates are adjusted as deemed necessary by the Company to reflect differences between the original accruals and actual costs of purchased transportation.

This method generally results in recognition of revenues and purchased transportation costs earlier than the preferred methods under GAAP which does not recognize revenue until a proof of delivery is received or which recognizes revenue as progress on the transit is made. The Company’s method of revenue and cost recognition does not result in a material difference from amounts that would be reported under such other methods.

~~All other revenue, including revenue from other value-added services including brokerage services, warehousing and fulfillment services, is recognized upon completion of the service.~~

The Company has issued restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock options to certain directors, officers and employees. The Company accounts for share-based compensation under the fair value recognition provisions such that compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is expensed ratably over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment about, among other things, stock volatility, the expected life of the award, and other inputs. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. The Company issues new shares of common stock to satisfy exercises and vesting of awards granted under its stock plans.

~~The Company recorded share-based compensation expense of $1,304, $1,407 and $1,115 for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.~~

Basic income per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income per share is computed similar to basic income per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares, such as stock awards and stock options, had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Net income attributable to common stockholders is calculated after earned preferred stock dividends, whether or not declared.

~~The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted per share computations for earnings per share as follows:~~

For the Company’s significant foreign subsidiaries that prepare financial statements in currencies other than U.S. dollars, the local currency is the functional currency. All assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates and all income statement amounts are translated at the weighted average rates for the period. Translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. Gains and losses on transactions of monetary items are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.

~~Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified in the Company’s consolidated financial statements to conform to the classification used in fiscal year 2017.~~

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, to clarify the principles used to recognize revenue for all entities. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08 to further clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018 and permits the use of either a retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is in the process of evaluating the adoption impact for each of the Company’s products and services, including any impact on gross versus net revenue recognition. As the Company completes the overall evaluation, it is identifying and preparing to implement changes to the Company’s accounting policies, practices, and controls to support the new standard.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, to replace existing guidance. The guidance requires the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for operating leases with terms more than 12 months on the balance sheet. Guidance is also provided for the presentation of leases within the statement of operations and cash flows. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard will impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements as future minimum lease payments under noncancelable leases totaled approximately $34.9 million as of June 30, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes, allowing the recognition of income tax consequences on intra-entity asset transfers. Current GAAP prohibits recognizing current and deferred income tax consequences for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company has approximately $1.7 million of such assets recorded in deposits and other assets in the consolidated balance sheets and is currently evaluating the impact and timing that the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Stock Compensation, to improve the accounting for share-based compensation. The guidance changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based compensation and the related financial statement presentation. The ASU includes a requirement that the tax effect related to settled share-based awards be recorded as a component of income tax expense or benefit rather than as a component of changes to additional paid-in capital. Cash flows related to excess tax benefits are now reflected as an operating activity. In addition, this ASU simplifies accounting of forfeitures and allows a company to make an accounting policy to estimate the number of share-based awards that are expected to vest and develop a forfeiture rate or to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company elected early adoption as of July 1, 2016, applied on a prospective basis. As such, there were no changes to prior periods presented. The presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid for withheld shares had no impact to the periods presented on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows since such cash flows have historically been presented as a financing activity.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows, to address eight specific cash flow issues to reduce existing divergence in practice. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company elected early adoption as of July 1, 2016, applied on a retrospective basis. The primary impact to the Company from this ASU is: 1) cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment are classified as cash outflows for financing activities; 2) cash payments made soon after an acquisition are classified as cash outflows for investing activities. Cash payments made after a business combination up to the amount of contingent consideration initially recorded are classified as cash outflows for financing activities. Any payments in excess of the amount initially recorded are classified as cash outflows from operating activities. For the year ended June 30, 2016, there was a reclassification of $15 from payments of contingent consideration from financing activities to operating activities.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, to supersede the current guidance by replacing the current two-step impairment test with a one-step impairment test. The guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company elected early adoption as of January 1, 2017.

~~In the prior fiscal year, the Company adopted ASU 2015-03, Imputation of Interest, and ASU 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.~~

On April 1, 2017, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary acquired Lomas Logistics (“Lomas”), a division of L.V. Lomas Limited. Lomas operates as a third-party logistics provider serving companies across a range of industries including consumer goods, healthcare, food, chemicals and technology and operates from locations in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada. The Lomas acquisition was financed with proceeds from the Integrated Private Debt Fund V LP loan (as defined in Note 6).

On June 1, 2017 the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary acquired the assets and operations of its strategic operating partner Dedicated Logistics Technologies, Inc. (“DLT”), a Newark, New Jersey based company. DLT is expected to transition to the Radiant brand and will combine with existing company owned operations in Newark while maintaining separate facilities in Los Angeles, California. The DLT acquisition was financed with proceeds from the Company’s Credit Facility (as defined in Note 6). The Company has structured the transaction similar to previous acquisitions, with a portion of the expected purchase price payable in subsequent periods based on future performance of the acquired operation. The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated using future projected earnings relative to the corresponding future earn-out payments. To calculate fair value, the future earn-out payments were then discounted using Level 3 inputs. The Company believes the discount rate used to discount the earn-out payments reflect market participant assumptions.

~~The acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred for the acquisitions consisted of the following:~~

The fair values of the intangible assets were estimated using a discounted cash flow approach with Level 3 inputs. Under this method, an intangible asset’s fair value is equal to the present value of the incremental after-tax cash flows (excess earnings) attributable solely to the intangible asset over its remaining useful life. To calculate fair value, the Company used risk-adjusted cash flows discounted at rates considered appropriate given the inherent risks associated with each type of asset. The Company believes the level and timing of cash flows appropriately reflect market participant assumptions.

The goodwill recorded is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes over a period of 15 years. The pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of these acquisitions was not material to the consolidated financial statements.

The results of operations for the businesses acquired are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of the date of purchase. The preliminary fair value estimates for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based upon preliminary calculations and valuations. The estimates and assumptions are subject to change as additional information is obtained for the estimates during the respective measurement periods (up to one year from the acquisition date). The primary areas of the preliminary estimates not yet finalized relate to certain tangible assets and liabilities acquired, goodwill and identifiable intangible assets.

On November 2, 2015, the Company acquired the operations and assets of Copper Logistics, Incorporated (“Copper”), a Minneapolis, Minnesota based company that provides a full range of domestic and international transportation and logistics services across North America. The Company has structured the transaction similar to previous acquisitions, with a portion of the expected purchase price payable in subsequent periods based on future performance of the acquired operation. The consideration paid, purchase price, and pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of this acquisition was not material to the consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the business acquired are included in the Company’s financial statements as of the date of purchase.

On April 2, 2015, the Company acquired the outstanding stock of Wheels Group, Inc. (“Wheels”). Under an Arrangement Agreement (the “Arrangement”), the Company purchased Wheels for approximately $26.9 million in cash and 6,900,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company was also responsible for a portion of Wheels’ transaction costs, in addition to its own costs. Wheels, founded in 1988, provides truck brokerage and intermodal services throughout the United States and Canada along with value-added warehouse and distribution service offerings in support of U.S. shippers looking to access the Canadian markets. Wheels is one of the largest third-party logistics providers in Canada. Wheels, now formally amalgamated into Wheels International, Inc., provides these services primarily to the food and beverage, consumer packaged goods, frozen foods and refrigerated product, and building products industries. The goodwill recognized is attributable to a larger geographic footprint and an increased service line expansion and is not deductible for tax purposes. The results of operations for Wheels are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of the date of purchase.

On June 8, 2015, the Company acquired the outstanding stock of Service by Air, Inc. (“SBA”), a privately-held New York corporation founded in 1976. SBA is a domestic and international freight forwarder serving manufacturers, distributors and retailers through a combination of three company-owned operating locations and forty independent strategic operating partners across North America. The base purchase price was approximately $12.25 million, consisting of $11.4 million paid in cash at closing, and $0.85 million payable net of working capital and other holdbacks. The goodwill recognized is attributable primarily to the expected cost synergies associated with eliminating redundancies and migrating back-office operations of SBA to the Company and is not deductible for tax purposes. The results of operations for SBA are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of the date of purchase.

On September 1, 2014, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the Company acquired the assets and operations of Trans-Net, Inc. (“TNI”), a privately-held company based in Issaquah, Washington. TNI has extensive experience providing integrated project logistics solutions in key Russian oil, gas, mining and infrastructure development markets. On December 15, 2014, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the Company acquired the assets and operations of Don Cameron & Associates, Inc. (“DCA”), a privately-held company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. DCA has extensive experience providing a full range of domestic and international transportation and logistics services across North America to the med-tech, advertising/marketing, pharmaceutical, and trade show industries. Effective as of June 1, 2015, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the company acquired the stock of Highways and Skyways, Inc. (“Highways”), a privately-held company based near Cincinnati, Ohio. Highways services a full range of domestic and international transportation and logistics services to manufacturing, apparel, paper products, medical devices, consumer products and technology industries. Each of the TNI, DCA and Highways acquisitions include earn-out payments that are payable upon achieving certain earnings up to a maximum contingent consideration of $6.5 million, although there are no maximums on certain of the earn-out payments.

Each of the TNI, DCA, Highways, and Copper acquisitions were financed with proceeds from the Company’s Credit Facility (as defined in Note 6), and the transactions were structured using cash, stock, and earn-out payments. The goodwill recorded is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes over a period of 15 years. The consideration paid, purchase price, and pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of these acquisitions was not material to the consolidated financial statements.

~~The acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred consisted of the following:~~

The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated using future projected earnings relative to the corresponding future earn-out payments. To calculate fair value, the future earn-out payments were then discounted using Level 3 inputs. The Company believes the discount rate used to discount the earn-out payments reflect market participant assumptions.

The results of operations for the businesses acquired are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of the date of purchase. The fair value estimates for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded in fiscal year 2015 were based upon preliminary calculations and valuations. During fiscal year 2016, certain preliminary fair value estimates changed by an immaterial amount as additional information was obtained causing the Company to modify the amount of recognized goodwill for Wheels and SBA, as well as the estimated working capital holdback for SBA.

Depreciation and amortization expense related to technology and equipment was $3,837, $3,473 and $965 for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Computer software includes approximately $4,021 of software currently in development as of June 30, 2017.

~~The table below reflects acquired intangible assets related to all acquisitions:~~

Amortization expense amounted to $8,512, $8,560 and $5,394 for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Future amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years ending June 30 and thereafter are as follows:

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND ~~OTHER LONG-TERM DEBT~~CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

~~Notes payable~~The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers and ~~other long-term debt consist~~directors. Each of the ~~following:~~executive officers will serve until his or her successor is appointed by our Board of Directors or such executive officer’s earlier resignation or removal. Each of the directors will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or such director’s earlier resignation or removal.

~~Future maturities~~We believe that our Board should be composed of ~~notes payable~~individuals with sophistication and experience in many substantive areas that impact our business. We believe that experience, qualifications, or skills in the following areas are most important: accounting and finance; strategic planning; logistics and operations, human resources and development practices; and board practices of other ~~long-term debt~~corporations. These areas are in addition to the personal qualifications described in this section. We believe that all of our current Board members possess the professional and personal qualifications necessary for board service and have highlighted particularly noteworthy attributes for each ofBoard member in the ~~next~~individual biographies below. The principal occupation and business experience, for at least the past five years, ~~ending June 30 and thereafter are~~of each current director is as follows:

~~Bank~~Bohn H. Crain. Mr. Crain has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of ~~America Credit Facility~~

~~The Company~~our Board of Directors since October 2005. Mr. Crain brings approximately 25 years of industry and capital markets experience in transportation and logistics. Since January 2005, Mr. Crain has served as the Managing Member of Radiant Capital Partners, LLC, an entity he formed to execute a ~~$75.0 million senior credit facility (the “Senior Credit Facility”) with Bank~~consolidation strategy in the transportation and logistics sector. Prior to founding Radiant, Mr. Crain served as the Executive Vice President and the Chief Financial Officer of ~~America, N.A. (the “Lender”) on its own behalf~~Stonepath Group, Inc. from January 2002 until December 2004. In 2001, Mr. Crain served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Schneider Logistics, Inc., a third-party logistics company, and from 2000 to 2001 he served as ~~agent to~~ the ~~other lenders named therein, currently consisting~~Vice President and Treasurer of ~~the Bank of Montreal (as the initial member of the syndicate under such loan)~~Florida East Coast Industries, Inc., ~~pursuant to~~ a ~~Second Amendment to Amended~~New York Stock Exchange listed company engaged in railroad and ~~Restated Loan~~real estate businesses. Between 1989 and ~~Security Agreement. The Senior Credit Facility includes~~2000, Mr. Crain held various vice president and treasury positions for CSX Corp., a ~~$3.5 million sublimit to support letters of credit and matures June 14, 2022.~~

~~Borrowings accrue interest based~~Fortune 500 transportation company listed on the ~~Company’s average daily availability at the Lender’s base rate plus 0.25% to 0.75% or for a LIBOR rate contract, LIBOR plus 1.25% to 1.75%.~~ ~~The~~ ~~Senior~~ ~~Credit Facility provides for advances~~New York Stock Exchange, and several of up to 85% of the eligible Canadian and domestic accounts receivable, 75% of eligible accrued but unbilled domestic receivables and eligible foreign accounts receivable, all of which are subject to certain sub-limits, reserves and reductions. ~~The Senior Credit Facility is~~ collateralized by a first-priority security interest in all of the assets of the U.S. co-borrowers, a first-priority security interest in all of the accounts receivable and associated assets of the Canadian co-borrowers (the “Canadian A/R Assets”) and a second-priority security interestits subsidiaries. He also serves on the ~~other assets~~Board of ~~the Canadian borrowers.~~

~~Borrowings are available to fund future acquisitions, capital expenditures, repurchase~~Trustees for Eastside Preparatory School in Bellevue, Washington. Mr. Crain earned a Bachelor of Company stock or for other corporate purposes. The terms of the Senior Credit Facility are subject to customary financial and operational covenants, including covenants that may limit or restrict the ability to, among other things, borrow under the Senior Credit Facility, incur indebtedness from other lenders, and make acquisitions. As of June 30, 2017, the Company wasArts in ~~compliance~~Business Administration with ~~all of its covenants.~~

~~As of June 30, 2017, based on available collateral and $0.3 million~~an emphasis in ~~outstanding letter of credit commitments, there was $51.8 million available for borrowing under the Senior Credit Facility.~~

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Wheels, Wheels obtained a CAD$29.0 million senior secured Canadian term loan from Integrated Private Debt Fund IV LP (“IPD IV”) pursuant to a CAD$29,000,000 Credit Facilities Loan Agreement. The Company and its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries are guarantors of the Wheels obligations thereunder. The loan matures on April 1, 2024 and accrues interest at a rate of 6.65% per annum. The Company is required to maintain five months interest in a debt service reserve account to be controlled by IPD IV. This amount is recorded as deposits and other assets in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company made interest-only payments for the first 12 months followed by blended principal and interest payments that will be paid through maturity.

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Lomas, Wheels obtained a CAD$10.0 million senior secured Canadian term loan from Integrated Private Debt Fund V LP pursuant to a CAD$10,000,000 Credit Facilities Loan Agreement. The Company and its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries are guarantors of the Wheels obligations thereunder. The loan matures on June 1, 2024 and accrues interest at a rate of 6.65% per annum. The loan repayment consists of monthly blended principal and interest payments.

The loans may be prepaid in whole at any time upon providing at least 30 days prior written notice and paying the difference between (i) the present value of the loan interest and the principal payments foregone discounted at the Government of Canada Bond Yield for the termAccounting from the ~~date~~University of ~~prepayment to the maturity date, and (ii) the face value of the principal amount being prepaid.~~

In connection with its acquisition of Wheels, the Company obtained a $25.0 million subordinated secured term loan from Alcentra Capital Corporation ($10.0 million) and Triangle Capital Corporation ($15.0 million) (collectively, the “Subordinated Lenders”) pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Alcentra/Triangle Subordinated Loan Agreement”). The loan matured on April 2, 2021 and accrued interest at a rate of 12% per annum during the first six months of the loan, followed by a variable rate of LIBOR plus 9.5%-12% (all with a 1% LIBOR floor), depending on the Company’s total leverage ratio.

~~In April 2016, the Company repaid in full all amounts outstanding, including accrued and unpaid interest, under the $25.0 million Alcentra/Triangle Subordinated Loan Agreement.~~ The total repayment amount was approximately $25.9 million, consisting of outstanding principal of $25.0 million, accrued and unpaid interest of $0.16 million, a prepayment premium of $0.75 million and other related fees and expenses.Texas. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Crain possesses particular knowledge and experience in logistics management, industry trends, business operations and accounting that strengthen the ~~voluntary payment,~~Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.

Jack Edwards. Mr. Edwards was appointed as a director in December 2011. Mr. Edwards is an independent business executive who since 2002 has been providing strategic, investment and operational advisory services to a broad range of corporate and private equity clients and boards. From 2001 through 2002, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response, Inc., a provider of private ambulatory services. Prior to this, Mr. Edwards served as the President and Chief Executive Officer at a variety of logistics and freight-forwarding companies, including Danzas Corporation and ITEL Transportation Group. Previously, he held senior executive positions at Circle International, American President Lines and The Southern Pacific Transportation Company. Mr. Edwards has served as a director of several publicly traded corporations, including Laidlaw Inc. (NYSE), ITEL Corp. (NYSE) and Sun Gro Horticulture Canada Ltd. (TSX) where he served as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Edwards currently serves as a director for Zonar Systems, Inc., Yesler, Inc., and DNA Brand Mechanics, LLC. Mr. Edwards received a Bachelor of Science in Food Science and Technology from the University of California, Davis, and a Master of Business Administration in Marketing from the University of Oregon. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Edwards possesses particular knowledge and experience in the transportation and logistics industry, along with business combinations and financial management, that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.

Richard P. Palmieri. Mr. Palmieri was appointed as a director in March 2014. He has been the Managing Partner of ANR Partners, LLC, a Philadelphia-based management and financial consulting firm, since 2012. Prior to this, from 2007 to 2012, Mr. Palmieri served as the President and CEO of Canon Financial Services, Inc., the captive finance subsidiary of Canon USA. From 2003 to 2006, he was the President and CEO of Schneider Financial Services, a financial services subsidiary of a large, privately held transportation and logistics company. From 1998 to 2003, he served as a Managing Director and co-head of the Transportation and Logistics investment banking group at Credit Suisse Group. From 1993 to 1998, he served as a Managing Director and co-head of the Transportation and Logistics investment banking group at Deutsche Securities. Before this, he served in various finance and management positions at several large companies, including Whirlpool Financial Corporation, PacificCorp Credit, Commercial Credit Company and GE Capital. Mr. Palmieri received a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Wagner College. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Palmieri possesses particular knowledge and experience in logistics and financial management that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills, and experience.

Michael Gould. Mr. Gould was appointed as a director in July 2016. Mr. Gould is a seasoned information technology executive, currently serving as the Chief Operating Officer for Zonar Systems, a subsidiary of Continental, AG. Prior to Zonar Systems Mr. Gould served as Senior Vice President, Oracle Consulting in North America at Oracle Corporation. Prior to this, from 2008 to 2015, Mr. Gould led the Americas Technology Services Consulting Organization for Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) as the Vice President and General Manager. Prior to HP, Mr. Gould served in various roles at Oracle, BearingPoint and BEA. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University and a Master of Business Administration from Santa Clara University. As a result of these and other professional experiences, Mr. Gould possesses particular knowledge and experience in management and technology that strengthen the Board’s collective qualifications, skills and experience.

Arnold Goldstein. Mr. Goldstein has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer since June 30, 2016. Mr. Goldstein also has significant experience within the transportation industry, having served as Chief Operating Officer of Service by Air, which was acquired by the Company ~~has satisfied all obligations under the subordinated secured loan. The Company also wrote off approximately $0.4 million~~in June 2015, and in various leadership roles at Hellman World Wide Logistics from May 2006 to February 2015. Mr. Goldstein earned a Bachelor of ~~unamortized loan fees.~~

~~The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value at $0.001 per share and 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 per share.~~

~~The Company has 839,200 shares of 9.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Shares”), which have a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share.~~

~~Dividends on the Series A Preferred Shares are cumulative~~Arts in Psychology from the ~~date~~University of ~~original issue~~Rhode Island and ~~are payable on January 31, April 30, July 31~~a Master of Business Administration from Bryant University.

Todd E. Macomber. Mr. Macomber has served as our Senior Vice President and ~~October 31,~~Chief Financial Officer since March 2011, as our Senior Vice President and ~~if declared by the Company’s board~~Chief Accounting Officer since August 2010, and as our Vice President and Corporate Controller since December 2007. Prior to joining us, Mr. Macomber served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ~~directors. If the Company does not pay dividends in full on any two payment dates (whether consecutive or not)~~Biotrace International, Inc., ~~the per annum dividend rate will increase~~a subsidiary of Biotrace International PLC, an additional 2.0% per annum per $25.00 stated liquidation preference, up to a maximum of 19.0% per annum. If the Company fails to maintain the listing of the Series A Preferred Shares on the NYSE American or other exchange for 30 days or more, the per annum dividend rate will increase by an additional 2.0% per annum so long as the listing failure continues. The Series A Preferred Shares require the Company to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of at least 2.0. If the Company is not in compliance with this ratio, then it cannot pay any dividend on its common stock. As of June 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with this ratio.

Commencing on December 20, 2018, the Company may redeem, at its option, the Series A Preferred Shares, in whole or in part, at a cash redemption price of $25.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared). Among other things, the Series A Preferred Shares have no stated maturity, are not subject to any sinking fund or other mandatory redemption, and are not convertible into or exchangeable for any of the Company’s other securities. Holders of Series A Preferred Shares generally have no voting rights, except if the Company fails to pay dividends on the Series A Preferred Shares for six or more quarterly periods (whether consecutive or not). Under such circumstances, holders of Series A Preferred Shares will be entitled to vote to elect two additional directors to the Company’s board of directors, until all unpaid dividends have been paid or declared and set aside for payment. In addition, certain changes to the terms of the Series A Preferred Shares cannot be made without the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding Series A Preferred Shares, voting as a separate class. The Series A Preferred Shares are senior to the Company’s common stock with respect to dividends and distributions, including distributions upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The Series A Preferred Shares areindustrial microbiology company listed on the ~~NYSE American under the symbol “RLGT-PA.”~~London Stock Exchange. Mr. Macomber earned a Bachelor of Arts, emphasis in Accounting from Seattle University.

~~For the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company’s board of directors declared and paid cash dividends to holders of Series A Preferred Shares in the amount of $2.4375 per share, totaling $2,046.~~

~~On July 16, 2015,~~Joseph Bento. Mr. Bento joined the Company closed a registered underwritten public offering of 6,133,334 shares of common stock, including the full exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. Proceeds from the offering totaled $38,430 after deducting the underwriting discount of $2,484 and offering costs of $486. The proceeds were used to reduce the borrowings under the Credit Facility.

Inin January 2016 ~~the Company’s board~~and served as Senior Vice President of ~~directors authorized the repurchase~~Operations until his appointment to Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of upFreight Forwarding Operations in mid-2016. Prior to ~~5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock through December 31, 2016. Under the stock repurchase program,~~joining the Company, ~~is authorized~~Mr. Bento served in a variety of significant roles within the transportation industry, including, (i) from June 2015 to ~~repurchase,~~November 2015, as Executive Vice President of Neovia Logistics, (ii) from ~~time-to-time, shares~~September 2012 to April 2015, as the Chief Sales Officer of SEKO Logistics; and (iii) from 1998 to 2012, in various leadership roles at Eagle Global Logistics and its ~~outstanding common stock~~successor, CEVA Logistics. Mr. Bento earned a Bachelor of Science in Finance from California State University – Long Beach.

Tim Boyce. Mr. Boyce has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Rail and Truck Brokerage Operations since our acquisition of Wheels in April 2015. He came to Wheels on February 1, 2012 to serve as the ~~open market at prevailing market prices or through privately negotiated transactions~~Executive Vice President - Marketing and Sales and was promoted to Chief Marketing Officer shortly thereafter. From October 2013 until April 2015, he served as ~~permitted~~President of Wheels’ U.S. operations. Prior to joining Wheels, Mr. Boyce was employed by ~~securities laws~~Canadian Pacific Railway where he served in various senior roles including General Manager - Sales and other legal requirements. The program did not obligate the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares and could be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. Under this repurchase program, the Company purchased 91,798 shares of its common stock at an average cost of $2.75 per share for an aggregate cost of $253 for the year end June 30, 2017.Marketing Domestic Intermodal. Prior to this, ~~fiscal year, there were no purchases~~he was the Vice President - Sales and Marketing with Canpar Transport Ltd, a leading Canadian courier company, and TST (formerly TNT) Overland Express, a leading Canadian based LTL company serving customers across North America.

John W. Sobba. Mr. Sobba has served as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel since May 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Sobba was in a private law practice from 2008 to 2018, handling a number of ~~common stock executed~~general commercial, real estate and business matters for clients within the technology, transportation, outdoor gear and apparel industries. Mr. Sobba was in the private practice of law with the law firms of Dorsey & Whitney and later with Foster Pepper, from 2004 through 2008. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Oregon, a Juris Doctor from Seattle University, a Master of Taxation from Boston University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Washington.

The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the ~~repurchase program.~~captions “Corporate Governance” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” is incorporated herein by reference.

~~NOTE 8 – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY~~The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the captions “Executive Compensation” is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED ~~PARTY TRANSACTIONS~~STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have the sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties are considered “variable interest entities”. RLP qualifies as a variable interest entity and is includedinformation in the ~~Company’s consolidated financial statements.~~Proxy Statement set forth under the captions “Principal Stockholders” and “Executive Compensation — Securities authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” is incorporated herein by reference.

RLP recorded profits of $95, $110 and $134 for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. RCP’s distributable share was $57, $66 and $80 for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The ~~non-controlling interest recorded as a reduction of income~~information in the ~~consolidated statements of operations represents RCP’s distributive share.~~

~~The following table sets~~Proxy Statement set forth ~~the Company’s financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:~~

The Company has contingent obligations to transfer cash payments and equity shares to former shareholders of acquired operations in conjunction with certain acquisitions if specified operating results and financial objectives are met over the next four fiscal years. Contingent consideration is measured quarterly at fair value, and any change in the contingent liability is included in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company recorded an increase to contingent consideration of $3,431 and $1,003 for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and a decrease of $3,921 for the year ended June 30, 2015. The change in the current period is principally attributable to a net increase in management’s estimates of future earn-out payments through the remainder of its earn-out periods.

The Company uses projected future financial results based on recent and historical data to value the anticipated future earn-out payments. To calculate fair value, the future earn-out payments were then discounted using Level 3 inputs. The Company has classified the contingent consideration as Level 3 due to the lack of relevant observable market data over fair value inputs. The Company believes the discount rate used to discount the earn-out payments reflects market participant assumptions. Changes in assumptions and operating results could have a significant impact on the earn-out amount, up to a maximum of $13.1 million through earn-out periods measured through May 2020, although there are no maximums on certain earn-out payments. Contingent consideration includes approximately $2.6 million that was earned during fiscal year 2017 and is payable November 2017.

~~The following table provides a reconciliation of the liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):~~

~~The following table reconciles income taxes based on the U.S. statutory tax rate to the Company’s income tax expense (benefit):~~

~~The following table reconciles the Company’s uncertain income tax positions:~~

The Company’s effective tax rate for the year ended June 30, 2017 is higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to state taxes and tax expense on the adjustment of ending deferred tax assets for the U.S. margin tax bracket rate. The Company does not have any uncertain tax positions and a minimal net operating loss carryover, due to expire primarily in the 2027 fiscal year.

The Company and its wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated Federal income tax return. The Company also files unitary or separate returns in various state, local and non-U.S. jurisdictions based on state, local and non-U.S. filing requirements. Tax years which remain subject to examination by U.S. authorities are the years ended June 30, 2014 through June 30, 2017. Tax years which remain subject to examination by state authorities are the years ended June 30, 2013 through June 30, 2017. Tax years which remain subject to examination by non-U.S. authorities are the periods ended December 31, 2013 through June 30, 2017. Occasionally acquired entities have tax years that differ from the Company and are still open under the ~~relevant statute of limitations and therefore are subject to potential adjustment.~~captions “Corporate Governance” is incorporated herein by reference.

~~NOTE 11 – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION~~ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The Company has two stock-based plans: the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2012 Stock Option and Performance Award Plan. Each plan authorizes the granting of up to 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The plans provide for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units. Options are granted at exercise prices equal to the fair value of the common stock at the date of the grant and have a term of 10 years. Generally, grants under each plan vest 20% annually over a five year period from the date of grant.

The Company grants restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. The Company granted restricted stock awards to certain employees in August 2012. The shares are restricted in transferability for a term of up to five years and are forfeitedinformation in the event the employee terminates employment prior to the lapse of the restriction and generally vest ratably over a five year period. The Company began granting restricted stock units to certain employees in October 2016. One unit is equivalent to one share of common stock. The restricted stock units generally vest after three years. During the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to stock awards of $170, $3 and $5, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had approximately $571 of total unrecognized share-based compensation costs related to unvested stock awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.25 years.

~~The following table summarizes stock award activity~~Proxy Statement set forth under the ~~plans:~~

~~For the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016~~captions “Principal Accounting Fees and 2015, the Company recognized share-based compensation expense related to stock options of $1,134, $1,404 and $1,110, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had approximately $2,673 of total unrecognized share-based compensation costs relating to unvested stock options whichServices” is ~~expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.87 years.~~

For the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the weighted average fair value per share of employee stock options granted was $1.96, $1.96 and $2.57, respectively. The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

~~The following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable options~~incorporated herein by ~~price range as of June 30, 2017:~~reference.

Outstanding Options

Exercisable Options

Exercise Prices

Number of
Shares

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(In thousands)

Number of
Shares

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(In thousands)

$0.00 - $0.49

350,000

1.61

$
0.25

$
1,796

350,000

1.61

$
0.25

$
1,796

$0.50 - $0.99

14,559

3.40

0.60

70

14,559

3.40

0.60

70

$1.00 - $1.49

115,844

3.82

1.31

471

105,844

3.67

1.30

432

$1.50 - $1.99

356,057

5.77

1.87

1,248

265,783

5.72

1.87

933

$2.00 - $2.49

598,628

5.16

2.28

1,855

463,248

4.85

2.29

1,433

$2.50 - $2.99

120,000

6.67

2.75

316

60,000

6.67

2.75

158

$3.00 - $3.49

608,746

8.04

3.24

1,303

134,757

7.18

3.17

297

$3.50 - $3.99

325,000

7.64

3.89

483

119,000

7.37

3.91

175

$4.00 - $4.49

212,389

7.61

4.19

253

74,947

7.49

4.13

94

$4.50 - $4.99

291,090

7.84

4.59

229

104,429

7.64

4.58

84

$5.00 - $5.49

84,281

7.86

5.27

11

33,725

7.86

5.27

4

$5.50 - $5.99

200,000

7.76

5.63

—

80,000

7.76

5.63

—

$6.00 - $6.49

50,000

9.86

6.18

—

—

—

—

—

$6.50 - $6.99

25,000

8.08

6.77

—

5,000

8.08

6.77

—

3,351,594

6.32

$
3.02

$
8,035

1,811,292

5.13

$
2.37

$
5,476

The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are in the very early stages of litigation and therefore difficult to judge their potential materiality. For those claims for which the Company can judge the materiality, in the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Legal expenses are expensed as incurred. A summary of potential material litigation is as follows.

~~Ingrid Barahona v. Accountabilities, Inc. d/b/a/ Accountabilities Staffing, Inc., Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. and DBA Distribution Services, Inc. (Ingrid Barahona California Class Action)~~

On October 25, 2013, plaintiff Ingrid Barahona filed a purported class action lawsuit against RGL, DBA Distribution Services, Inc. (“DBA”), and two third-party staffing companies (collectively, the “Staffing Defendants”) with whom Radiant and DBA contracted for temporary employees. In the lawsuit, Ms. Barahona, on behalf of herself and the putative class, seeks damages and penalties under California law, plus interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs, along with equitable remedies, alleging that she and the putative class were the subject of unfair and unlawful business practices, including certain wage and hour violations relating to, among others, failure to provide meal and rest periods, failure to pay minimum wages and overtime, and failure to reimburse employees for work-related expenses. Ms. Barahona alleges that she was jointly employed by the staffing companies and Radiant and DBA. Radiant and DBA deny Ms. Barahona’s allegations in their entirety, deny that they are liable to Ms. Barahona or the putative class members in any way, and are vigorously defending against these allegations based upon a preliminary evaluation of applicable records and legal standards.

If Ms. Barahona’s allegations were to prevail on all claims the Company, as well as its co-defendants, could be liable for uninsured damages in an amount that, while not significant when evaluated against either the Company’s assets or current and expected level of annual earnings, could be material when judged against the Company’s earnings in the particular quarter in which any such damages arose, if at all. However, based upon the Company’s preliminary evaluation of the matter, it does not believe it is likely to incur material damages, if at all, since, among others: (i) the amount of any potential damages remains highly speculative at this stage of the proceedings; (ii) the Company does not believe as a matter of law it should be characterized as Ms. Barahona’s employer and codefendant Accountabilities admitted to being the employer of record, (iii) wage and hour class actions of this nature typically settle for amounts significantly less than plaintiffs’ demands because of the uncertainly with litigation and the difficulty in taking these types of cases to trial; and (iv) Ms. Barahona has indicated her desire to resolve this matter through a mediated settlement. Ms. Barahona admitted in a report to the court that she is unable to prosecute the case because the payroll and personnel records she needs are in the possession of Tri-State and/or Accountabilities (“Debtors”), and the case has been stayed as to them pending resolution of their chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. In January 2016, the court held a status conference, which was continued multiple times so that the parties could attempt to obtain the necessary documents. DBA and the Company informally obtained all records within co-defendants’ bankruptcy estate through their trustee’s counsel; however, those records were incomplete and did not contain the requisite time, payroll and personnel records. Based on its belief that the debtors have additional records and in an effort to lift the bankruptcy “stay”, Ms. Barahona obtained the dismissal of the debtors without prejudice from the state court action. The court set a deadline of November 30, 2017, for Ms. Barahona to file her motion for class certification, and set a further status conference for December 14, 2017, to set a briefing schedule for the motion for class certification. The court has also ordered the parties to participate in mediation by August 31, 2017. The Company has been awaiting further action from Ms. Barahona with respect to the foregoing. The mediation has not taken place and the Company is unsure whether the court will issue another order requiring the parties to mediate this matter in the future. At this time, the Company is unable to express an opinion as to the likely outcome of the matter.

High Protection Company, a Utah Company, Plaintiff v. Professional Air Transportation, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, d/b/a ADCOM, SLC; Radiant Logistics, Inc., a Foreign Corporation; ADCOM World-Wide, an Operating Division of Radiant Logistics, Inc.; Radiant Global Logistics, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, d/b/a Container Lines; Felipe Lake, an individual, Rubens Correa, an individual; and Does 1-100, Defendants, United States District Court of Utah (Central), Civil Docket No. 2:14-cv-00466-TC-BCW (formerly Salt Lake County, Utah, Case # 140902965)

On or about May 27, 2014, the Company, together with its co-defendants, including certain of its subsidiaries, were sued in the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. The matter was subsequently removed to the Federal Courts in the United States District Court, for the District of Utah. The lawsuit alleges liability and damages arising from the ocean shipment of five (5) armored vehicles from Jordan to the Kandahar Air Base, Afghanistan, commencing in August, 2011.

On April 10, 2011, the Plaintiff, High Protection Company, was awarded a contract from the United States Army in the amount of $0.7 million for the manufacture and delivery of five armored vehicles. The vehicles were to be delivered to the Kandahar Airfield in Kandahar, Afghanistan, by May 16, 2011. The delivery of the vehicles was delayed into 2013 due to various delays that occurred during the shipping process, including the closing of the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan from November 2011 to July 2012. In June 2013, the United States Army terminated its contract with the Plaintiff. Plaintiff asserted damages against the Company and its co-defendants in excess of $1.0 million, including loss of a $0.7 million contract with the United States Army, demurrage and storage charges now alleged to exceed $0.2 million, and loss of the vehicles.

A mediation took place in early 2016 and the parties were unable to come to a resolution. Subsequent to the mediation, the Company filed a Motion for Summary Judgment with the Court on the basis that the claim is time barred. Additionally, the Court, of its own accord, asked the parties for briefing on the subject of “Jurisdiction.”

On January 4, 2017, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, pursuant to which the Company and its co-defendants agreed to pay the Plaintiff the aggregate amount of approximately $0.1 million, which was covered under the Company’s insurance policy, and the parties agreed to release all claims related to the lawsuit. The Court accepted the settlement and the case has been dismissed with prejudice.

The Company’s agreements with respect to previous acquisitions contain future consideration provisions which provide for the selling equity owners to receive additional consideration if specified operating objectives and financial results are achieved in future periods, as defined in their respective agreements. Any changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. Earn-out payments are generally due annually on November 1, and 90 days following the quarter of the final earn-out period for each respective acquisition.

~~The following table represents the estimated undiscounted earn-out payments to be paid in each of the following fiscal years:~~

The Company evaluates the performance of the segments primarily based on their respective revenues, net revenues and income from operations. Accordingly, capital expenditures and total assets are not reported in segment results. In addition, the Company has disclosed a corporate segment, which is not an operating segment and includes the costs of the Company’s executives, board of directors, professional services such as legal and consulting, amortization of acquired intangible assets and certain other corporate costs associated with operating as a public company. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations.

Year Ended June 30, 2017 (in thousands):

United States

Canada

Corporate/
Eliminations

Total

Revenues

$
685,173

$
96,751

$
(4,311
)

$
777,613

Net revenues

173,742

20,894

—

194,636

Income (loss) from operations

25,726

3,810

(19,048
)

10,488

Other income (expense)

561

40

(2,497
)

(1,896
)
Income (loss) before income tax expense

26,287

3,850

(21,545
)

8,592

Depreciation and amortization

2,371

734

9,244

12,349

Technology and equipment, net

13,147

1,350

730

15,227

Transition and lease termination costs

1,582

541

137

2,260

Transition and lease termination liability

400

1,614

—

2,014

Goodwill

45,381

21,398

—

66,779

Year Ended June 30, 2016 (in thousands):

Revenues

$
682,491

$
104,762

$
(4,674
)

$
782,579

Net revenues

167,602

19,059

—

186,661

Income (loss) from operations

22,109

96

(22,542
)

(337
)
Other income (expense)

1,220

(170
)

(6,052
)

(5,002
)
Income (loss) before income tax expense

23,329

(74
)

(28,594
)

(5,339
)
Depreciation and amortization

1,890

671

9,472

12,033

Technology and equipment, net

9,360

1,634

1,459

12,453

Transition and lease termination costs

3,339

2,606

—

5,945

Transition and lease termination liability

714

1,782

—

2,496

Goodwill

42,984

19,904

—

62,888

Year ended June 30, 2015 (in thousands)

Revenues

$
473,683

$
29,923

$
(941
)

$
502,665

Net revenues

118,174

5,549

—

123,723

Income (loss) from operations

21,869

587

(11,906
)

10,550

Other expense

(471
)

(252
)

(1,856
)

(2,579
)
Income (loss) before income tax expense

21,398

335

(13,762
)

7,971

Depreciation and amortization

798

167

5,394

6,359

Technology and equipment, net

9,016

1,972

2,188

13,176

Transition and lease termination costs

678

92

—

770

Transition and lease termination liability

284

—

—

284

Goodwill

43,185

19,904

—

63,089

On July 14, 2017, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend to holders of the Series A Preferred Shares in the amount of $0.609375 per share. The total declared dividend totaled $511 and was paid on July 31, 2017.

On September 1, 2017, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, RGL, the Company acquired the operations and assets of Sandifer-Valley Transportation & Logistics, Ltd., a Texas based company providing a full range of domestic and international cross-border services with Mexico. The Company has structured the transaction similar to previous acquisitions, with a portion of the expected purchase price payable in subsequent periods based on future performance of the acquired operation. The consideration paid, purchase price, and pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of this acquisition was not material to the financial statements.

~~The Company’s unaudited results of operations for each of the quarters in the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are summarized below:~~

The Company’s consolidated financial statements filed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are included in Part II, Item 8.

The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are included under Item 15(b) below.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Delaware		04-3625550
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(~~IRS~~I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Title of ~~Each Class~~each class		Trading Symbol(s)		Name of ~~Exchange~~each exchange on which ~~Registered~~registered
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value		RLGT		NYSE American

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒

Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐☒
Emerging growth company	☐

PART I

ITEM 11.	BUSINESS	2
ITEM 1A1A.	RISK FACTORS	8
ITEM 1B1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	2422
ITEM 22.	PROPERTIES	2422
ITEM 33.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	2522
ITEM 44.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	2523

PART II

ITEM 55.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	2624
ITEM 66.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	2824
ITEM 77.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	2825
ITEM 7A7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK	4032
ITEM 88.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	4035
ITEM 99.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL ~~DISCLOSURES~~DISCLOSURE	4160
ITEM 9A9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	4160
ITEM 9B9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	4160

PART III

ITEM 1010.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	4261
ITEM 1111.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	4363
ITEM 1212.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	4463
ITEM 1313.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	4463
ITEM 1414.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	4463

PART IV

ITEM 1515.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	4463
ITEM 16.	FORM 10-K SUMMARY	66
Signatures		4867
~~Financial Statements~~		~~F-1~~

●	Tempe, Arizona	●	Taylor, Michigan	●	~~Jamaica, New York~~Portland, Oregon
●	Carson, California	●	~~Bloomington,~~Mendota Heights, Minnesota	●	~~Woodbury, New York~~Folcroft, Pennsylvania
●	~~Woodridge,~~Bensenville, Illinois	●	~~Southhaven,~~Southaven, Mississippi	●	~~Portland, Oregon~~Middletown, Pennsylvania
●	~~Hebron, Kentucky~~Woodridge, Illinois	●	Edison, New Jersey	●	~~Folcroft, Pennsylvania~~Argyle, Texas
●	Hebron, Kentucky	●	Jamaica, New York	●	Laredo, Texas
●	Louisville, Kentucky	●	~~Woodbridge,~~Woodbury, New ~~Jersey~~York	●	~~Laredo,~~McAllen, Texas

●	Calgary, Alberta	●	Brampton, Ontario	●	Laval, Québec
●	Delta, British Columbia	●	Mississauga, Ontario	●	~~Laval, Québec~~
●	~~Brampton, Ontario~~

	High		Low
Year ended June 30, 2017:
Quarter ended June 30, 2017	$	6.65	$	4.80
Quarter ended March 31, 2017		5.96		3.39
Quarter ended December 31, 2016		4.15		2.48
Quarter ended September 30, 2016		3.32		2.45

Year ended June 30, 2016:
Quarter ended June 30, 2016	$	4.19	$	2.98
Quarter ended March 31, 2016		3.78		2.95
Quarter ended December 31, 2015		4.57		3.32
Quarter ended September 30, 2015		7.75		4.21

	Investment value as of June 30,
	2012		2013		2014		2015		2016		2017
Radiant Logistics, Inc.	$	100	$	111	$	177	$	418	$	171	$	307
Dow Jones Transportation Average Index		100		119		157		155		144		184
Russell 2000 Index		100		122		149		157		144		177

	Year Ended June 30, 2019										Year Ended June 30, 2018
Operating expenses as a percent of net revenue ⁽¹⁾:	United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations	Total			United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations	Total
Operating partner commissions		51.8	%		0.0	%	N/A		44.6	%		50.9	%		0.0	%	N/A		44.4	%
Personnel costs		21.6	%		43.5	%	N/A		26.2	%		23.6	%		56.3	%	N/A		29.3	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		9.3	%		21.2	%	N/A		12.4	%		8.8	%		32.4	%	N/A		13.1	%
Depreciation and amortization		1.8	%		4.9	%	N/A		6.6	%		1.5	%		4.9	%	N/A		7.2	%

	Year Ended June 30, 2016												Year Ended June 30, 2015
	United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations			Total			United States			Canada			Corporate/ Eliminations			Total
Transportation revenue
Forwarding	$	543,155		$	4,156		$	(358	)	$	546,953		$	434,976		$	3,427		$	—		$	438,403
Brokerage		134,387			97,338			(4,316	)		227,409			37,575			25,881			(941	)		62,515
		677,542			101,494			(4,674	)		774,362			472,551			29,308			(941	)		500,918

Cost of transportation
Forwarding		392,612			3,425			(358	)		395,679			321,704			2,112			—			323,816
Brokerage		122,277			82,278			(4,316	)		200,239			33,805			22,262			(941	)		55,126
		514,889			85,703			(4,674	)		595,918			355,509			24,374			(941	)		378,942

Net transportation revenue
Forwarding		150,543			731			—			151,274			113,272			1,315			—			114,587
Brokerage		12,110			15,060			—			27,170			3,770			3,619			—			7,389
		162,653			15,791			—			178,444			117,042			4,934			—			121,976
Net transportation margins		24.0	%		15.6	%					23.0	%		24.8	%		16.8	%					24.4	%

Other value-added services		4,949			3,268			—			8,217			1,132			615			—			1,747
Net revenues	$	167,602		$	19,059		$	—		$	186,661		$	118,174		$	5,549		$	—		$	123,723

(In thousands)	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 years
Senior Credit Facility ⁽¹⁾	$	13,780	$	—	$	—	$	13,780	$	—
Long-term debt ⁽²⁾		34,512		5,099		9,990		9,990		9,433
Contingent consideration ⁽³⁾		13,148		2,502		6,389		4,257		—
Lease termination and transition costs		2,014		1,210		804		—		—
Operating lease obligations		34,891		8,545		15,531		10,251		564
Preferred dividends ⁽⁴⁾		10,228		2,046		4,091		4,091		—

Total contractual obligations	$	108,573	$	19,402	$	36,805	$	42,369	$	9,997

(1) Credit facility expires in 2022 and interest has not been included.
(2) Amount includes Senior Secured Loans of $27,514, with a carrying value of CAD$35,667, and related interest.
(3) Represents the known maximum undiscounted contingent consideration obligations that may become payable in each period.
(4) We have the option to redeem Series A Preferred Shares beginning December 2018. This table assumes no repurchases and payment of dividends for five years as the future amounts cannot be determined.

(In thousands)	Balance as of June 30, 2019		Transition Adjustment				Balance as of July 1, 2019
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Assets
Operating lease right-of-use asset	$	—	$	16,637			$	16,637

Liabilities
Deferred rent liability		862		(862	)			—
Other current liability		532		6,711		⁽¹⁾		7,243
Operating lease liability, net of current portion		—		10,788		⁽²⁾		10,788

(In thousands)	Balance as of June 30, 2018		Transition Adjustments			Balance as of July 1, 2018
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Assets
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts	$	137,578	$	(32,689	)	$	104,889
Contract assets		—		34,014			34,014

Liabilities
Accounts payable		90,153		(3,995	)		86,158
Operating partner commissions payable		14,322		(959	)		13,363
Contract liabilities		—		6,716			6,716
Deferred income taxes		8,665		(102	)		8,563

Equity
Retained earnings	$	15,539	$	(335	)	$	15,204

	June 30, 2019
(In thousands)	As Reported		Adjustments for ASC 606			Balance, ASC 605
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Assets
Accounts receivable, net of allowance	$	93,123	$	20,797		$	113,920
Contract assets		17,777		(17,777	)		—

Liabilities
Accounts payable		74,097		2,177			76,274
Operating partner commissions payable		12,891		627			13,518
Deferred income taxes		7,838		50			7,888

Equity
Retained earnings	$	26,883	$	166		$	27,049

(In thousands, except share data)	Year Ended June 30,
	2019			2018
Numerator:
Net income attributable to Radiant Logistics, Inc.	$	16,346		$	10,188
Less: preferred stock dividends		(956	)		(2,046	)
Less: issuance costs for preferred stock redemption		(1,659	)		—
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	13,731		$	8,142

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic		49,497,007			49,239,870
Dilutive effect of share-based awards		1,585,645			1,394,801

Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted		51,082,652			50,634,671

Potentially dilutive common shares excluded		454,199			1,260,588

(In thousands)		June 30,
	Useful Life	2019			2018
Computer software	3 - 5 years	$	18,013		$	15,842
Trailers and related equipment	3 - 15 years		6,941			6,362
Office and warehouse equipment	3 - 15 years		4,082			3,205
Leasehold improvements	⁽¹⁾		3,672			3,155
Computer equipment	3 - 15 years		2,529			2,210
Furniture and fixtures	3 - 15 years		973			919

			36,210			31,693
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization			(16,083	)		(13,127	)

		$	20,127		$	18,566

	June 30, 2019
(In thousands)	Weighted Average Amortization Period	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Customer related	5.0 years	$	97,002	$	(52,076	)	$	44,926
Trade names and trademarks	10.6 years		14,977		(4,252	)		10,725
Covenants not to compete	2.0 years		875		(784	)		91

		$	112,854	$	(57,112	)	$	55,742

	June 30, 2018
(In thousands)	Weighted Average Amortization Period	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Customer related	6.1 years	$	96,515	$	(43,140	)	$	53,375
Trade names and trademarks	11.6 years		14,977		(3,236	)		11,741
Covenants not to compete	1.7 years		875		(727	)		148

		$	112,367	$	(47,103	)	$	65,264

(In thousands)
2020	$	9,953
2021		9,394
2022		8,841
2023		8,363
2024		7,988

(In thousands)	Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2019
	Level 3		Total
Contingent consideration	$	375	$	375

	Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2018
	Level 3		Total
Contingent consideration	$	2,575	$	2,575

(In thousands)	Contingent Consideration
Balance as of June 30, 2017	$	9,920
Increase related to accounting for acquisitions		225
Measurement period adjustment ⁽¹⁾		(2,500	)
Contingent consideration paid		(3,894	)
Change in fair value		(1,176	)

Balance as of June 30, 2018	$	2,575
Contingent consideration paid		(993	)
Change in fair value		(1,207	)

Balance as of June 30, 2019	$	375

~~Name~~⁽¹⁾	~~Age~~	~~Position~~
~~Bohn H. Crain~~	53	~~Chief Executive Officer and Chairman~~In December 2017, the Company adjusted the fair value of contingent consideration for DLT as a result of additional information obtained during the ~~Board of Directors~~
~~Jack Edwards~~	72	~~Director~~
~~Richard P. Palmieri~~	64	~~Director~~
~~Michael Gould.~~	53	~~Director~~
~~Arnold Goldstein~~	63	~~Senior Vice President & Chief Commercial Officer~~
~~Todd E. Macomber~~	53	~~Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer~~
~~Joseph Bento~~	54	~~Senior Vice President & Chief Operating Officer of Freight Forwarding Operations~~
~~Tim Boyce~~	57	~~Senior Vice President & Chief Operating Officer of Rail and Truck Brokerage Operations~~measurement period that existed from the acquisition date resulting in a measurement period adjustment for DLT to the preliminary amounts recognized.

	Number of Units			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested balance as of June 30, 2018		490,829		$	3.88
Granted		242,955			4.47
Forfeited		(45,864	)		4.05

Unvested balance as of June 30, 2019		687,920		$	4.08

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (In thousands)
Outstanding as of June 30, 2018		2,795,588		$	3.22		5.60	$	2,815
Exercised		(311,165	)		2.40		—		1,037
Forfeited		(26,330	)		6.05		—		—

Outstanding as of June 30, 2019		2,458,093		$	3.30		4.69	$	6,995

Exercisable as of June 30, 2019		1,998,766		$	3.11		4.34	$	6,062

(In thousands)
2020	$	7,176
2021		5,753
2022		3,691
2023		1,003
2024		392
Thereafter		314

Total minimum lease payments	$	18,329

(In thousands)	Lease Termination Costs			Retention and Severance Costs			Total
Balance as of June 30, 2017	$	1,614		$	400		$	2,014
Transition and lease termination costs		63			113			176
Payments and other		(706	)		(99	)		(805	)

Balance as of June 30, 2018	$	971		$	414		$	1,385
Transition and lease termination costs		(11	)		—			(11	)
Payments and other		(875	)		(237	)		(1,112	)

Balance as of June 30, 2019	$	85		$	177		$	262

(In thousands)	2020
Earn-out payments:
Cash	$	505
Equity⁽¹⁾		94

Total estimated earn-out payments	$	599

~~Signature~~	~~Title~~	~~Date~~


~~/s/ Jack Edwards~~	~~Director~~	~~September 12, 2017~~
~~Jack Edwards~~

~~/s/ Richard P. Palmieri~~	~~Director~~	~~September 12, 2017~~
~~Richard P. Palmieri~~

~~/s/ Michael Gould~~	~~Director~~	~~September 12, 2017~~
~~Michael Gould~~

~~/s/ Bohn H. Crain~~	~~Chairman and~~	~~September 12, 2017~~
~~Bohn H. Crain~~	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

~~/s/ Todd E. Macomber~~	~~Senior Vice President and Chief~~	~~September 12, 2017~~
~~Todd E. Macomber~~	Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

~~Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~		~~F-2~~

~~Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 and 2016~~		~~F-3~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015~~		~~F-4~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015~~		~~F-5~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015~~		~~F-6 – F-7~~

~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements~~		~~F-8 – F-30~~

(In thousands):
Cash, net of cash acquired	$	11,515
Common stock		500
Working capital and other holdbacks		750
Contingent consideration		4,500

	$	17,265

(In thousands)
Technology and equipment	$	1,810
Other assets		295
Intangibles		11,300
Goodwill		3,891

Total assets acquired		17,296

Other liabilities		31

Total liabilities assumed		31

Net assets acquired	$	17,265

(In thousands)	Wheels		SBA		Other
Cash, net of cash acquired	$	26,948	$	10,903	$	5,719
Common stock		38,847		—		369
Working capital and other holdbacks		—		573		733
Contingent consideration		—		—		2,025

	$	65,795	$	11,476	$	8,846

Fair value of acquired receivables (in thousands):	Wheels			SBA			Other
Gross amount due	$	34,903		$	18,959		$	834
Estimated uncollectible amounts		(268	)		(376	)		(27	)

	$	34,635		$	18,583		$	807

(In thousands)	June 30,						Weighted- Average
	2017			2016			Life
Customer related	$	96,106		$	85,824		7.21 years
Trade names and trademarks		14,977			14,069		11.24 years
Covenants not to compete		850			740		2.43 years

		111,933			100,633
Less: Accumulated amortization		(37,204	)		(28,692	)

	$	74,729		$	71,941

~~RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC.~~

~~Date: September 12, 2017~~

~~/s/ Bohn H. Crain~~

~~Bohn H. Crain~~

~~Chief Executive Officer~~

~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~