UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-34756

 

Tesla, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Delaware

 

91-2197729

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

 

 

3500 Deer Creek Road

Palo Alto, California

 

94304

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

(650) 681-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.001 par valuestock

TSLA

The NASDAQ StockNasdaq Global Select Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter)during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

Large accelerated filer

 

  

Accelerated filer

 

 

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer

 

  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

  

Smaller reporting company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Emerging growth company

 

 

 

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes      No  

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of June 30, 2017,2020, the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $47.83$160.57 billion (based on the closing price for shares of the registrant’s Common Stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market on June 30, 2017)2020). Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer, director, and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of February 14, 2018,1, 2021, there were 168,919,941959,853,504 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2020.

 

 

 


 

TESLA, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172020

INDEX

 

 

 

 

 

Page

PART I.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

 

Business

  

14

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

1514

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

 

3327

Item 2.

 

Properties

 

3327

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

3428

Item 4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

 

3528

 

 

 

PART II.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

3629

Item 6.

 

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

 

3830

Item 7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

3931

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

5849

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

6050

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

119107

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

119107

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

 

120107

 

 

 

PART III.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

121108

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 

121108

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

121108

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

121108

Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

121108

 

 

 

 

PART IV.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

121108

Item 1616.

 

Summary

 

151125

 

 

 

Signatures

 

152126

 

 

 

i


 

Forward-Looking Statements

The discussions in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements reflecting our current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning any potential future impact of the coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) pandemic on our business, our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, profitability, expected cost reductions, capital adequacy, expectations regarding demand and acceptance for our technologies, growth opportunities and trends in the market in which we operate, prospects and plans and objectives of management. The words “anticipates”, “believes”,“anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “plans”, “projects”, “will”,“estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements that we make. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the risks set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

 



PARTPART I

ITEMITEM 1.

BUSINESS

Overview

We design, develop, manufacture, sell and selllease high-performance fully electric vehicles and energy generation and storage systems, and also install and maintain such systems and sell solar electricity. We are the world’s only vertically integratedoffer services related to our sustainable energy company, offering end-to-end clean energyproducts. We generally sell our products directly to customers, including generation, storagethrough our website and consumption.retail locations. We have established andalso continue to grow our customer-facing infrastructure through a global network of stores, vehicle service centers, andMobile Service technicians, body shops, Supercharger stations and Destination Chargers to accelerate the widespread adoption of our products. We emphasize performance, attractive styling and the safety of our users and workforce in the design and manufacture of our products and we continueare continuing to develop full self-driving capability in ordertechnology for improved safety. We also strive to improve vehicle safety.lower the cost of ownership for our customers through continuous efforts to reduce manufacturing costs and by offering financial services tailored to our products. Our sustainable energy products, engineering expertise, intense focusmission to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy, andengineering expertise, vertically integrated business model and focus on user experience differentiate us from other companies.

Segment Information

We currently produceoperate as two reportable segments: (i) automotive and sell three fully(ii) energy generation and storage.

The automotive segment includes the design, development, manufacturing, sales and leasing of electric vehicles the Model S sedan, the Model X sport utility vehicle (“SUV”) and the Model 3 sedan. All of our vehicles offer high performance and functionality as well as attractive styling.

We commenced deliveriessales of Model S in June 2012automotive regulatory credits. Additionally, the automotive segment is also comprised of services and have continuedother, which includes non-warranty after-sales vehicle services, sales of used vehicles, retail merchandise, sales by our acquired subsidiaries to improve Model S by introducing performance, all-wheel drive dual motor, and autopilot options, as well as free over-the-air software updates. We commenced deliveries of Model X in September 2015. Model X offers seating for up to seven people, all-wheel drive, and our autopilot functionality. We commenced deliveries of Model 3, a lower priced sedan designed for the mass market, in July 2017 and continue to ramp its production.

We also intend to bring additional vehicles to market in the future, including trucks and an all-new sports car. The production of fully electric vehicles that meets consumers’ range and performance expectations requires substantial design, engineering, and integration work on almost every system of our vehicles. Our designthird party customers and vehicle engineering capabilities, combined with the technical advancements of our powertrain system, have enabled us to designinsurance revenue. The energy generation and develop electric vehicles that we believe overcomestorage segment includes the design, styling, and performance issues that have historically limited broad adoption of electric vehicles. As a result, our customers enjoy several benefits, including:

Long Range and Recharging Flexibility. Our vehicles offer ranges that significantly exceed those of any other commercially available electric vehicle. In addition, our vehicles incorporate our proprietary on-board charging system, permitting recharging from almost any available electrical outlet, and also offer fast charging capability from our Supercharger network.

High-Performance Without Compromised Design or Functionality. Our vehicles deliver instantaneous and sustained acceleration, an advanced autopilot system with active safety and convenience features, and over-the-air software updates.

Energy Efficiency and Cost of Ownership. Our vehicles offer an attractive cost of ownership compared to internal combustion engine or hybrid electric vehicles. Using only an electric powertrain enables us to create more energy efficient vehicles that are mechanically simpler than currently available hybrid or internal combustion engine vehicles. The cost to fuel our vehicles is less compared to internal combustion vehicles. We also expect our electric vehicles will have lower relative maintenance costs than other vehicles due to fewer moving parts and the absence of certain components, including oil, oil filters, spark plugs and engine valves.

We sell our vehicles through our ownmanufacture, installation, sales and service network which we are continuing to grow globally. The benefits we receive from distribution ownership enable us to improve the overall customer experience, the speedleasing of product developmentsolar energy generation and the capital efficiency of our business. We are also continuing to build our network of Superchargers and Destination Chargers in North America, Europe and Asia to provide both fast charging that enables convenient long-distance travel as well as other convenient charging options.

In addition, we are leveraging our technological expertise in batteries, power electronics, and integrated systems to manufacture and sell energy storage products. In late 2016, we began production and deliveries of our latest generation energy storage products Powerwall 2 and Powerpack 2. Powerwall 2 is a 14 kilowatt hour (kWh) home battery with an integrated inverter. Powerpack 2 is an infinitely scalable energy storage system for commercial, industrialrelated services and utility applications, comprisedsales of 210 kWh (AC) battery packs and 50 kVa (at 480V) inverters.


Similar to our electric vehicles, our energy storage products have been developed to receive over-the-air firmware and software updates that enable additional features over time.

Finally, we sell and lease solar systems (with or without accompanying energy storage systems) to residential and commercial customers and sell renewable energy to residential and commercial customers at prices that are typically below utility rates. Since 2006, we have installed solar energy systems for hundreds of thousands of customers. Our long-term lease and power purchase agreements with our customers generate recurring payments and create a portfolio of high-quality receivables that we leverage to further reduce the cost of making the switch to solar energy. The electricity produced by our solar installations represents a very small fraction of total U.S. electricity generation. With tens of millions of single-family homes and businesses in our primary service territories, and many more in other locations, we have a large opportunity to expand and grow this business.incentives.

We manufacture our vehicle products primarily at our facilities in Fremont, California, Lathrop, California, Tilburg, Netherlands and at our Gigafactory 1 near Reno, Nevada. We manufacture our energy storage products at Gigafactory 1 and our solar products at our factories in Fremont, California and Buffalo, New York (Gigafactory 2).

Our Products and Services

Vehicles

Model S

Model S is a fully electric, four-door, five-adult passenger sedan that offers compelling range and performance. We offer performance and all-wheel drive dual motor system options. Model S 100D is the longest range all-electric production sedan in the world, and the performance version with the Ludicrous speed upgrade is the quickest accelerating production vehicle ever.

Model S includes a 17 inch touch screen driver interface, our advanced autopilot hardware to enable both active safety and convenience features, and over-the-air software updates. We believe the combination of performance, safety, styling, convenience and energy efficiency of Model S positions it as a compelling alternative to other vehicles in the luxury and performance segments.

Model X

Model X is the longest range all-electric production sport utility vehicle in the world, and offers high performance features such as our fully electric, all-wheel drive dual motor system and our autopilot system. Model X can seat up to seven adults and incorporates a unique falcon wing door system for easy access to the second and third seating rows. Model X is sold in all the markets where Model S is available, including in Asia and Europe.Automotive

Model 3

Model 3 is our third generation electric vehicle. Wea four-door mid-size sedan that we designed for manufacturability with a base price for mass-market appeal, which we began deliveriesdelivering in July 2017. We currently manufacture Model 3 is produced at the TeslaFremont Factory in Fremont, California and at Gigafactory 1. We will offerShanghai.

Model Y

Model Y is a variant of thiscompact sport utility vehicle at a starting price of $35,000 and expect to produce(“SUV”) built on the Model 3 vehiclesplatform with seating for up to seven adults, which we began delivering in March 2020. We currently manufacture Model Y at far higher volumes than our the Fremont Factory and at Gigafactory Shanghai.

Model S orand Model X vehicles.

Model S is a four-door full-size sedan that we began delivering in June 2012. Model X is a mid-size SUV with seating for up to seven adults, which we began delivering in September 2015. Model S and Model X feature the highest performance characteristics and longest ranges that we offer in a sedan and SUV, respectively, and we manufacture both models at the Fremont Factory.

Future Consumer and Commercial EVs Electric Vehicles

We are planning to introduce additionalhave also announced several planned electric vehicles to address additional vehicle markets, including specialized consumer electric vehicles in Cybertruck and the new Tesla Roadster and a broader cross-sectioncommercial electric vehicle in Tesla Semi. We also plan to introduce in the future a lower-cost vehicle to leverage developments in our proprietary Full Self-Driving (“FSD”), battery cell and other technologies.

Energy Generation and Storage

Energy Storage Products

We began deliveries of the vehicle market, including commercial EVs such as the Tesla Semi truck,most recent generations of Powerwall, Powerpack and a new version of the Tesla Roadster. We have started to accept reservations for both of these new vehicles.

Energy Storage

Using the energy management technologies and manufacturing processes developed forMegapack, which are our vehicle powertrain systems, we developedlithium-ion battery energy storage products for useintegrated with inverters and control technology, in homes, commercial facilities2016, 2017 and on the utility grid. Advances in battery architecture, thermal management and power electronics that were originally commercialized in our vehicles, are now being leveraged in our energy storage products. Our energy storage systems are used for backup power, grid independence, peak demand reduction, demand response, reducing intermittency of renewable generation and wholesale electric market services.


Our energy product portfolio includes systems with a wide range of applications, from residential use to use in large grid-scale projects.2019, respectively. Powerwall 2 is a 14 kWh rechargeable lithium-ion battery designed to store energy at a home or small commercial facilityfacility. Megapack and can be used to provide seamless backup power in a grid outage and to maximize self-consumption of solar power generation. In addition, we offer the Powerpack 2 system, a fully integratedare energy storage solution comprising of 210kWh (AC) battery packssolutions for commercial, industrial, utility and 50 kVa (at 480V) inverters that canenergy generation customers, which may be grouped together to form MWh and GWh sized installations. The Powerpack 2 system can be used by commercial and industrial customers for peak shaving, load shifting, self-consumptionlarger installations capable of solarreaching gigawatt hours (“GWh”) or greater. We also offer integrated systems combining energy generation and demand response, as well as to provide backup power during grid outages, and by utilities and independent power producers to smooth and firm the output of renewable power generation sources, provide dynamic energy capacity to the grid, defer or eliminate the need to upgrade transmission infrastructure, and provide a variety of other grid services such as frequency regulation and voltage control. Powerpack 2 can also be combined with renewable energy generation sources to create microgrids that provide remote communities with clean, resilient and affordable power.

Along with designing and manufacturingstorage. Our energy storage products we continue to develop and advance ourare currently assembled at Gigafactory Nevada.


We have also developed software capabilities for the controlremotely controlling and optimal dispatch ofdispatching our energy storage systems across a wide range of markets and applications.applications, including through our real-time energy trading platform.

Solar Energy SystemsOfferings

The major components of ourWe sell retrofit solar energy systems includeto customers and channel partners and also make them available through lease and power purchase agreement (“PPA”) arrangements and a subscription-based sale of solar panels that convert sunlight into electrical current, inverters that convertpower, which is currently available in limited U.S. markets. We purchase most of the electrical output from the panels to a usable current compatible with the electric grid, racking that attaches the solar panels to the roof or ground, electrical hardware that connects thecomponents for our retrofit solar energy system to the electric grid and our monitoring device. While we have recently started manufacturing solar panels in Gigafactory 2 in collaboration with Panasonic, we currently purchase the majority of system componentssystems from vendors, maintaining multiple sources for each major component to ensure competitive pricing and an adequate supply of materials.supply. We also design and manufacture other system components.

Sales of residentialcertain components for our solar systems enable our customers to take direct advantage of federal tax credits to reduce their electricity costs. Our solar loan offering enables customers to own their solar system with little upfront cost. We also continue to offer lease and power purchase agreement options to both residential and commercial customers. Our current standard leases and PPAs have a 20-year term, and we typically offer customers the opportunity to renew our agreements.energy products.

In October 2016,2019, we unveiledcommenced direct customer and channel partner sales of the third generation of our Solar Roof, which integrates solarcombines premium glass roof tiles with energy generation. We are ramping the volume production with aesthetically pleasing and durable glass roofing tiles and is designed to complement the architecture of homes and commercial buildings while turning sunlight into electricity. We recently commenced Solar Roof production at our Gigafactory 2 in Buffalo, New York, and we are beginning to install them in customers’ homes.improving our installation capability and efficiency.

Technology

VehiclesAutomotive

Battery and Powertrain

Our core vehicle technology competencies areinclude powertrain engineering vehicle engineering, innovativeand manufacturing and energy storage. Our core intellectual property includes our electric powertrain, our ability to design a vehiclevehicles that utilizesutilize the unique advantages of an electric powertrain and our development of self-driving technologies. Our powertrain consists of our battery pack, power electronics, motor, gearbox and control software.powertrain. We offer several powertrain variants for our vehicles that incorporate years of research and development. In addition, we have designed our proprietary powertrain systems to be adaptable, efficient, reliable and cost-effective while withstanding the rigors of an automotive environment. We offer dual motor powertrain vehicles, which use two electric motors to incorporate the latest advances in consumer technologies, such as mobile computing, sensing, displays, and connectivity.

Battery Pack

We design our battery packs to achieve high energy density at a low cost while also maintaining safety, reliability and long life. Our proprietary technology includes systems for high density energy storage, cooling, safety, charge balancing, structural durability, and electronics management. We have also pioneered advanced manufacturing techniques to manufacture large volumes of battery packs with high quality at low cost.


We have significant expertise in the safety and management systems needed to use lithium-ion cells in the automotive environment, and have further optimized cell designs to increase overall performance. These advancements have enabled us to improve costmaximize traction and performance of our batteries over time.

Our engineeringin an all-wheel drive configuration, and manufacturing efforts have been performed with a longer-term goal of building a foundationare introducing vehicle powertrain technology featuring three electric motors for further development. For instance,increased performance.

Among other things, we have designed our battery pack to permit flexibility with respect to battery cell chemistry and form factor. We maintain extensive testing and R&D capabilities at the individual cell level, the full battery-pack level,for battery cells, packs and other critical battery pack systems, and have built an expansive body of knowledge on lithium-ion cell vendors, chemistry types and performance characteristics. We believe that the flexibilityIn order to enable a greater supply of our designs, combined with our research and real-world performance data, will enable us to continue to evaluate new battery cells and optimize battery pack system performance and cost for our currentproducts with higher energy density at lower costs, we are currently using our expertise to develop a new proprietary lithium-ion battery cell and future vehicles.

Power Electronics

The power electronics in our electric vehicle powertrain govern the flow of high voltage electrical current throughout our vehicles and serve to power our electric motor to generate torque while driving and deliver energy into the battery pack while charging.

The drive inverter converts direct current (“DC”) from the battery pack into alternating current (“AC”) to drive our induction motors and provides “regenerative braking” functionality, which captures energy from the wheels to charge the battery pack. The primary technological advantages to our designs include the ability to drive large amounts of current in a small physical package.

The charger charges the battery pack by converting alternating current (usually from a wall outlet or other electricity source) into direct current that can be accepted by the battery. Tesla vehicles can recharge on a wide variety of electricity sources due to the design of this charger, from a common household outlet to high power circuits meant for more industrial uses.

Dual Motor Powertrain

We offer dual motor powertrain vehicles, which use two electric motors to provide greater efficiency, performance, and range in an all-wheel drive configuration. Tesla’s dual motor powertrain digitally and independently controls torque to the front and rear wheels. The almost instantaneous response of the motors, combined with low centers of gravity, provides drivers with controlled performance and increased traction control.improved manufacturing processes.

Vehicle Control and Infotainment Software

The performance and safety systems of our vehicles and their battery packs require sophisticated control software. There are numerous processors in our vehicles to control these functions, and we write custom firmware for many of these processors. Software algorithms control traction, vehicle stability and the sustained acceleration and regenerative braking of the vehicle, and are also used extensively to monitor the charge state of the battery pack and to manage all of its safety systems. Drivers use the information and controlControl systems in our vehicles to optimize performance, customize vehicle behavior, manage charging modes and times and control all infotainment functions. We develop almost all of this software, including most of the user interfaces, internally.internally and update our vehicles’ software regularly through over-the-air updates.

Self-Driving Development

We have expertise in vehicle autopilotdeveloping technologies, systems including auto-steering, traffic aware cruise control, automated lane changing, automated parking, Summon and software to enable self-driving vehicles using primarily vision and radar-based sensors. Our FSD Computer runs our neural networks in our vehicles, and we are also developing additional computer hardware to better enable the massive amounts of field data captured by our vehicles to continually train and improve these neural networks for real-world performance.

Currently, we offer in our vehicles certain advanced driver warning systems. In October 2016, we began equipping all Tesla vehicles with hardware needed for full self-driving capability, including cameras that provide 360 degree visibility, updated ultrasonic sensors for object detection, a forward-facing radar with enhanced processing,assist systems under our Autopilot and a powerful new onboard computer. Our autopilot systems relieve our drivers of the most tedious and potentially dangerous aspects of road travel.FSD options. Although at present the driver is ultimately responsible for controlling the vehicle, our system providessystems provide safety and convenience functionality that allows our customers to rely on itrelieves drivers of the most tedious and potentially dangerous aspects of road travel much like the system that airplane pilots use, when conditions permit. This hardware suite, alongAs with other vehicle systems, we improve these functions in our vehicles over time through over-the-air firmware updates and field data feedback loops from the onboard camera, radar, ultrasonics, and GPS, enables the systemupdates.

We intend to continually learn and improve its performance.


Additionally, we continue to make significant advancementsestablish in the developmentfuture an autonomous Tesla ride-hailing network, which we expect would also allow us to access a new customer base even as modes of fully self-driving technologies.transportation evolve.

Energy Generation and Storage

Energy Storage Products

We are leveragingleverage many of the component levelcomponent-level technologies from our vehicles to advancein our energy storage products, including high density energy storage, cooling, safety, charge balancing, structural durability, and electronics management.products. By taking a modular approach to the design of battery systems, we are able to maximizecan optimize manufacturing capacity to produce both Powerwall and Powerpackamong our energy storage products. Additionally, we are making significant stridesour expertise in the area of bi-directional, grid-tied power electronics that enableenables us to interconnect our battery systems seamlessly with global electricity grids while providing fast-acting systems for power injection and absorption. We have also developed the software to remotely control and dispatch our energy storage systems using our real-time energy trading platform.


Solar Energy Systems

We are continually innovatinghave engineered Solar Roof over numerous iterations to combine aesthetic appeal and developing new technologies to facilitate the growthdurability with power generation. The efficiency of our solar energy systems business. For example, Solar Roofproducts is beingaided by our own solar inverter, which also incorporates our power electronics technologies. We designed both products to work seamlesslyintegrate with Tesla Powerwall 2 and we have developed proprietary software to reduce system design and installation timelines and costs.Powerwall.

Design and Engineering

VehiclesAutomotive

In addition to the design, development and production of the powertrain, weWe have createdestablished significant in-house capabilities in the design and test engineering of electric vehicles and their components and systems. We design and engineer bodies, chassis, interiors, heating and cooling and low voltage electrical systems in house and to a lesser extent in conjunction with our suppliers. Our team has core competencies in computer aided design as well as durability, strength and crash test simulations, which reduces the product development time of new models.

Additionally, our team has expertise in lightweight materials, a very important characteristic for electric vehicles given the impact of mass on range. Model Sselecting and Model X are builtworking with a lightweight aluminum body and chassis which incorporates a varietyrange of materials for our vehicles to balance performance, cost and durability in ways that are best suited for our vehicles’ target demographics and utility. We have also used our capabilities to achieve complex engineering feats in stamping, casting and thermal systems, and are currently developing designs that integrate batteries directly with vehicle body structures without separate battery packs to optimize manufacturability, weight, range and cost characteristics.

We are also expanding our manufacturing operations globally while exploring ways to localize our vehicle designs and production methods that help optimizefor particular markets, including country-specific market demands and factory optimizations for local workforces. As we increase our capabilities, particularly in the weightareas of automation, die-making and line-building, we are also making strides in the vehicle. Moreover, we have designed Model 3 with a mix of materialssimulations modeling these capabilities prior to be lightweight and safe while also increasing cost-effectiveness for this mass-market vehicle.construction.

Energy Generation and Storage

We have an in-house engineering team that both designs our energy storage products themselves, and works with our residential, commercial and utility customers to design bespoke systems incorporating our products. Our team’s expertise in electrical, mechanical, civil and software engineering enablesallows us to create integrateddesign and manufacture our energy generation and storage products and components. We also employ our design and engineering expertise to customize solutions including our energy storage solutions that meet the particular needs of all customer types.

Solar Energy Systems

We also have an in-house engineering team that designs a customizedproducts, solar energy system systems and/or Solar Roof for each of our customers and which works closely with our energy storage engineering teams to integrate an energy storage system when requested by the customer.meet their specific needs. We have developed software that simplifies and expedites the design process and optimizes the design to maximizemaximizes the energy production of each system. Our engineers complete a structural analysis of each building and produce a full set of structural design and electrical blueprintssolar energy system, as well as mounting hardware that contain the specifications for all system components. Additionally, we design complementary mounting and grounding hardware where required.facilitates solar panel installation.

Sales and Marketing

Vehicles

Company-Owned Stores and Galleries

We market and sell our vehicles directly to consumers through an international network of company-owned stores and galleries which we believe enables us to better control costs of inventory, manage warranty service and pricing, maintain and strengthen the Tesla brand, and obtain rapid customer feedback. Our Tesla stores and galleries


are highly visible, premium outlets in major metropolitan markets, some of which combine retail sales and service. We have also found that opening a service center in a new geographic area can increase demand. As a result, we have complemented our store strategy with sales facilities and personnel in service centers to more rapidly expand our retail footprint. We refer to these as “Service Plus” locations.

Used Car Sales

Our used car business supports new car sales by integrating the sale of a new Tesla vehicle with a customer’s trade-in needs for their existing Tesla and non-Tesla vehicles. The Tesla and non-Tesla vehicles we acquire through trade-ins are subsequently remarketed, primarily to the general public and through third-party auto auctions. We also receive used Tesla vehicles to resell through lease returns and other sources.

Charging

On the road, customers can also charge using our Supercharger network or at a variety of destinations that have deployed our charging equipment. In addition, our vehicles can charge at a variety of public charging stations around the world, either natively or through a suite of adapters. This flexibility in charging provides customers with additional mobility in addition to their ability to conveniently charge their vehicles overnight at home.

We continue to build out our Tesla Supercharger network throughout North America, Europe, Asia and other markets to enable convenient, long-distance travel. Our Supercharger network is a strategic corporate initiative designed to provide fast charging to enable long-distance travel and remove a barrier to the broader adoption of electric vehicles caused by the perception of limited vehicle range. The Tesla Supercharger is an industrial grade, high speed charger designed to recharge a Tesla vehicle significantly more quickly than other charging options. To satisfy growing demand, Supercharger stations typically have between six and twenty Superchargers and are strategically placed along well-travelled routes to allow Tesla vehicle owners the ability to enjoy long distance travel with convenient, minimal stops. Additionally, we are also building Superchargers in an increasing number of city centers to enable urban use. Use of the Supercharger network is either free or requires a small fee.

We are working with a wide variety of hospitality locations, including hotels, resorts, shopping centers and parks to offer an additional charging option for our customers. These Destination Charging partners deploy Tesla wall connectors and provide charging to Tesla vehicle owners that patronize their businesses.

Where possible, we are co-locating Superchargers with our solar and energy storage systems to reduce the cost of electricity and promote the use of renewable electricity by Tesla vehicle owners.  

Orders and Reservations

We typically carry a small inventory of our vehicles at our Tesla stores which are available for immediate sale. The majority of our customers, however, customize their vehicle by placing an order with us via the Internet.

Marketing

Historically, we have been able to generate significant media coverage of our company and our vehicles,products, and we believe we will continue to do so. To date, for vehicle sales,Such media coverage and word of mouth have beenare the current primary drivers of our sales leads and have helped us achieve sales without traditional advertising and at relatively low marketing costs.

SolarAutomotive

Direct Sales

Our vehicle sales channels currently include our website and an international network of company-owned stores. In some jurisdictions, we also have galleries to educate and inform customers about our products, but such locations do not actually transact in the sale of vehicles. We believe this infrastructure enables us to better control costs of inventory, manage warranty service and pricing, educate consumers about electric vehicles, maintain and strengthen the Tesla brand and obtain rapid customer feedback.

We reevaluate our sales strategy both globally and at a location-by-location level from time to time to optimize our current sales channels. Sales of vehicles in the automobile industry tend to be cyclical in many markets, which may expose us to volatility from time to time.

Used Vehicle Sales

Our used vehicle business supports new vehicle sales by integrating the trade-in of a customer’s existing Tesla or non-Tesla vehicle with the sale of a new or used Tesla vehicle. The Tesla and non-Tesla vehicles we acquire as trade-ins are subsequently remarketed, either directly by us or through third parties. We also remarket used Tesla vehicles acquired from other sources including lease returns.

Public Charging

We have a growing global network of Tesla Superchargers, which are our industrial grade, high-speed vehicle chargers. Where possible, we co-locate Superchargers with our solar and energy storage systems to reduce costs and promote renewable power. Supercharger stations are typically placed along well-traveled routes and in and around dense city centers to allow Tesla vehicle owners the ability to enjoy quick, reliable and ubiquitous charging with convenient, minimal stops. Use of the Supercharger network either requires payment of a fee or is free under certain sales programs.


We also work with a wide variety of hospitality, retail and public destinations, as well as businesses with commuting employees, to offer additional charging options for our customers. These Destination Charging and workplace locations deploy Tesla Wall Connectors to provide charging to Tesla vehicle owners who patronize or are employed at their businesses. We also work with single-family homeowners and multi-family residential entities to deploy home charging solutions.

In-App Upgrades

As our vehicles are capable of being updated remotely over-the-air, our customers may purchase additional paid options and features through the Tesla app. We expect that this functionality will also allow us to offer certain options and features on a subscription basis in the future.

Energy Generation and Storage

We market and sell our solar and energy storage products to individuals,residential, commercial and industrial customers and utilities through a variety of channels. We emphasize simplicity, standardization and accessibility to make it easy and cost-effective for customers to adopt clean energy, while reducing our customer acquisition costs.

OurIn the U.S., we offer residential solar and energy storage products appear in an increasing number ofdirectly through our website, stores and galleries, in the U.S. which generates further interest in these products. In the U.S., we also useas well as through our national sales organization,network of channel partner network and customer referral program to market and sell our residential solar and energy storage systems.partners. Outside of the U.S., we use our international sales organization and a network of channel partners to market and sell Powerwall 2, and we have recently launched pilot programsthese products for the sale of residential solar products in certain countries.market. We also sell Powerwall 2 directly to utilities. In the case of products sold to utilities who then deployor channel partners, such partners typically sell the product and manage the installation in customer homes.


We sell Powerpack 2our commercial and utility-scale energy storage systems to commercial and utility customers through our U.S. and international sales organization which consists of experienced power industry professionals in all of our target markets, as well as throughand our channel partner network. In the U.S and Mexico,certain jurisdictions, we also sell installed solar energy systems (with or without energy storage) to commercial customers through cash, lease and power purchase agreementPPA transactions.

Service and Warranty

VehiclesAutomotive

Service

We provide service for our electric vehicles at our company-owned service centers, at our Service Plus locations or, in certain areas,and through Tesla mobileMobile Service technicians who provide services that do not require a vehicle lift.perform work remotely at customers’ homes or other locations. Performing vehicle service ourselves allowsprovides us to identify problems, find solutions, and incorporate improvements faster than incumbent automobile manufacturers.

Our vehicles are designed with the capability to wirelessly upload data to us via an on-board system with cellularidentify problems and implement solutions and improvements faster, and optimize logistics and inventory better, than traditional automobile manufacturers and their dealer networks. The connectivity allowingof our vehicles also allows us to diagnose and remedy many problems before ever looking at the vehicle. When maintenance or service is required, a customer can schedule service by contacting one of our Tesla service centers or our Tesla mobile technicians can perform an array of services from a customer’s home or other remote location.remotely and proactively.

New Vehicle Limited Warranty, MaintenanceWarranties and Extended Service Plans

We provide a four yearmanufacturer’s limited warranty on all new and used Tesla vehicles we sell, which may include separate limited warranties on certain components, specific types of damage or 50,000 mile New Vehicle Limited Warrantybattery capacity retention. We also currently offer extended service plans that provide coverage beyond the new vehicle limited warranties for certain models in specified regions.

Energy Generation and Storage

We provide service and repairs to our energy product customers, including under warranty where applicable.

Energy Storage Systems

We generally provide manufacturer’s limited warranties with every new vehicle, subject toenergy storage product and offer certain extended limited warranties that are available at the time of purchase of the system. If we install a system, we also provide certain limited warranties on our installation workmanship. As part of our energy storage system contracts, we may provide the customer with performance guarantees that warrant that the underlying system will meet or exceed the minimum energy performance requirements specified in the contract.

Solar Energy Systems

For retrofit solar energy systems, we provide separate limited warranties for the supplemental restraint systemworkmanship and battery and drive unit. For the battery and drive unit on our current new Model S and Model X vehicles, we offer an eight year, infinite mile limited warranty, although the battery’s charging capacity is not covered. For the battery and drive unit on our current new Model 3 vehicles, we offer an eight year or 100,000 mile limited warranty for our standard range battery and an eight year or 120,000 mile limited warranty for our long range battery, with minimum 70% retention of battery capacity over the warranty period.

In addition to the New Vehicle Limited Warranty, we currently offer for Model S and Model X a comprehensive maintenance program for every new vehicle, which includes plans covering prepaid maintenance for up to four years or up to 50,000 miles and an Extended Service plan. The maintenance plans cover annual inspections and the replacement of wear and tear parts, excluding tires and the battery. The Extended Service plan covers the repair or replacement of vehicle parts for up to an additional four years or up to an additional 50,000 miles after the New Vehicle Limited Warranty.

Energy Storage

We generally provide a ten year “no defect” and “energy retention” warranty with every Powerwall 2 and a fifteen year “no defect” and “energy retention” warranty with every Powerpack 2 system. For Powerwall 2, the energy retention warranty involves us guaranteeing that the energy capacity of the product will be 70% or 80% (depending on the region of installation) of its nameplate capacity after 10 years of use. For Powerpack 2, the energy retention warranty involves us guaranteeing a minimum energy capacity in each of its first 15 years of use. For both products, our warranty is subject to specified use restrictions or kWh throughput caps. In addition, we offer certain extended warranties, which customers are able to purchase from us at the time they purchase an energy storage system, including a 20 year extended protection plan for Powerwall 2 and a selection of 10 or 20 year performance guarantees for Powerpack 2. We agree to repair or replace our energy storage products in the event of a valid warranty claim. In circumstances where we install a Powerwall 2 or Powerpack 2 system, we also provide warranties, generally ranging from one to four years, on our installation workmanship. All of the warranties for our energy storage systems are subject to customary limitations and exclusions.

Solar Energy Systems

For traditional solar systems that are leased or under power purchase agreements (“PPAs”), we provide a full system warranty for 20 years from installation. For other traditional solar systems, we provide a 20 year installation warranty and a warranty against roof leaks, of at least a year. We also pass-through the inverter and module manufacturer warranties (typically 10 years and 25 years respectively) and for an additional fee, offer an extended


inverter warranty that runs from the end of the manufacturer’s warranty until 20 years after system installation. When we sell or lease a traditional solar system, or a customer pays up front in full under a PPA, we compensate the customer if their system produces less energy than guaranteed over a specified period. For Solar Roof, we provide a warranty against glass tile chipping or crackinglimited warranties for defects and weatherization. For components not manufactured by us, we generally pass-through the lifetimeapplicable manufacturers’ warranties. As part of the home, a 30 year installation warranty, a 30 year weatherization warranty and a power output warranty. For all systems (traditional and Solar Roof)our solar energy system contracts, we alsomay provide service and repair (either under warranty or for a fee) during the entire term of the customer relationship.with performance guarantees that warrant that the underlying system will meet or exceed the minimum energy generation requirements specified in the contract.


Financial Services

VehiclesAutomotive

Purchase Financing and Leases

We offer loans and leasesleasing and/or loan financing arrangements for our vehicles in certain jurisdictions in North America, Europe and Asia primarily through various financial institutions. We also offer financing arrangements directly through our local subsidiaries inUnder certain areas of the U.S., Germany, Canada and the UK. We intend to broaden our financial services offerings during the next few years. 

Certain of our current financingsuch programs, outside of North America provide customers with awe have provided resale value guarantee under which those customers have the option of selling their vehicle back to us at a preset future date, generally at the end of the term of the applicable loanguarantees or financing program, for a pre-determined resale value. In certain markets, we also offer vehicle buyback guarantees to financial institutions whichthat may obligate us to repurchase the subject vehicles at pre-determined values. We also offer vehicle financing arrangements in certain markets for a pre-determined price.specified vehicle models directly through our local subsidiaries.

Insurance

In August 2019, we launched an insurance product designed for our customers, which offers rates that are often better than other alternatives. This product is currently available in California, and we plan to expand both the markets in which we offer insurance products and our ability to offer such products, as part of our ongoing effort to decrease the total cost of ownership for our customers.

Energy Generation and Storage

Energy Storage Systems

We currently offer certain loan, lease and/or PPA options to residential or commercial customers who pair energy storage systems with solar energy systems. We intend to introduce financial services offerings for customers who purchase standalone energy storage products in the future.

Solar Energy Systems

We are an industry leader in offering innovativeoffer various financing alternatives that allowoptions to our customers to take direct advantage of available tax credits and incentives to reduce the cost of owning a solar energy system through a solar loan, or to make the switch to solar energy with little to no upfront costs under a lease or PPA.customers. Our solar loan offers third-party financing directly to a qualified customer to enable the customer to purchase and own a solar energy system. We are not a party to the loan agreement, between the customer and the third-party lender, and the third-party lender has no recourse against us with respect to the loan. Our solar lease offers customers a fixed monthly fee at rates that typically translate into lower monthly utility bills and an electricity production guarantee. Our solar PPA charges customers a fee per kWhkilowatt-hour based on the amount of electricity produced by our solar energy systems, at rates typically lower than their local utility rate. Both our lease and PPA create high-quality, recurringsystems. We monetize the customer payments that we monetizereceive from our leases and PPAs through funds we have formed with investors.

Energy Storage

We currently offer a loan product to residential customers who purchase Powerwall 2 together with a new solar system, and lease and power purchase agreements to commercial customers who purchase a Powerpack 2 system together with a new solar system. Wealso intend to introduce financial services offerings for customers who purchase energy storage only, as well as for our Solar Roof customers in the future.

Manufacturing

Vehicles

We conduct vehicle manufacturing and assembly operations at our facilitiesManufacturing Facilities in Fremont, California; Lathrop, California; and Tilburg, Netherlands. We have also built and continue to expand a cell and battery manufacturing facility, Gigafactory 1, outside of Reno, Nevada.

The Tesla Factory in Fremont, CA and Manufacturing Facility in Lathrop, CAthe Bay Area, California

We manufacture and test our vehicles at our manufacturing facilities in the Bay Area in California, including the Fremont Factory and other local manufacturing facilities. We also manufacture and develop certain parts and components that are critical to our intellectual property and quality standards, at the Tesla Factory and our manufacturing facility in Lathrop, CA. The Tesla Factory contains several manufacturing operations, including stamping, machining, casting, plastics, body assembly, paint operations, drive unit production, final vehicle assembly and end-of-line testing. In addition, we manufacture lithium-ion battery packs, electric motors, gearboxes and components forsuch as Model S and Model X battery packs and our proprietary lithium-ion battery cells, at the Tesla Factory. Some major vehicle component systems are purchased from suppliers; however we have a high level of vertical integration in our manufacturing processes at the Tesla Factory.these locations.


The Netherlands

Our European headquarters and manufacturing facilities are located in Amsterdam and Tilburg. Our operations in Tilburg include final assembly, testing and quality control for vehicles delivered within the European Union, a parts distribution warehouse for service centers throughout Europe, a center for remanufacturing work and a customer service center.

Gigafactory 1 outside ofNevada near Reno, Nevada

Gigafactory 1 is a facility where we work together with our suppliers to integrateWe have integrated battery material, cell, module and battery pack production for Model 3, Model Y and our energy products in one location. We use the battery packs manufacturedlocation at Gigafactory 1 for our vehicles, including Model 3 and energy storage products. We alsoNevada. In addition, we manufacture Model 3vehicle drive units at Gigafactory 1.

Gigafactory 1 is being built in phases. Tesla, Panasonic and other partners are currently manufacturing inside the finished sections. Our present plan is to continue expanding Gigafactory 1 over the next few years so that its capacity significantly exceeds the approximately 500,000 vehicle per year capacity that we announced when we first started developing it, and to additionally have sufficient capacity for our energy storage products.

We believe thatproducts there. Gigafactory 1 will allowNevada allows us to achieveaccess high volumes of lithium-ion battery cells manufactured by our partner Panasonic there while achieving a significant reduction in the cost of our battery packs oncepacks. We continue to invest in Gigafactory Nevada to achieve additional output there, including through our agreement with Panasonic.

Gigafactory New York in Buffalo, New York

We use Gigafactory New York for the development and production of our Solar Roof and other solar products and components, energy storage components and Supercharger components, and for other lessor-approved functions.

Gigafactory Shanghai in China

We established Gigafactory Shanghai to increase the affordability of our vehicles for customers in local markets by reducing transportation and manufacturing costs and eliminating the impact of unfavorable tariffs. We continue to increase the degree of localized procurement and manufacturing there. Gigafactory Shanghai is representative of our plan to iteratively improve our manufacturing operations as we establish new factories, as we implemented the learnings from our Model 3 ramp at the Fremont Factory to commence and ramp our production there quickly and cost-effectively.


Other Manufacturing

Generally, we continue to expand production capacity at our existing facilities. We also intend to further increase cost-competitiveness in our significant markets by strategically adding local manufacturing, including at Gigafactory Berlin in Germany and Gigafactory Texas in Austin, Texas, which are in volume production with Model 3. We have committed to substantial capital expenditures for Gigafactory 1. Panasonic has agreed to partner with us on Gigafactory 1 with investments in production equipment that it will use to manufacture and supply us with battery cells. Through our ownership of Gigafactory 1 and our partnership with Panasonic, we own sole access to a facility designed to be the highest-volume and lowest-cost source of lithium-ion batteries in the world.under construction.

Supply Chain

Our vehiclesproducts use thousands of purchased parts which we source globallythat are sourced from hundreds of suppliers.suppliers across the world. We have developed close relationships with severalvendors of key parts such as battery cells, electronics and complex vehicle assemblies. Certain components purchased from these suppliers particularly inare shared or are similar across many product lines, allowing us to take advantage of pricing efficiencies from economies of scale.   

As is the procurementcase for most automotive companies, most of cellsour procured components and certain other key system parts. While we obtain componentssystems are sourced from single suppliers. Where multiple sources in some cases, similar to other automobile manufacturers, many of the components used in our vehicles are purchased by us from a single source. In addition, while several sources of the battery cell we have selected for our battery packs are available for certain key components, we have currently fully qualified only one cell supplierwork to qualify multiple suppliers for the battery packs we usethem where it is sensible to do so in ourorder to minimize production vehicles.risks owing to disruptions in their supply. We are working to fully qualify additional cells from other manufacturers.also mitigate risk by maintaining safety stock for key parts and assemblies and die banks for components with lengthy procurement lead times.  

WeOur products use various raw materials in our business including aluminum, steel, cobalt, lithium, nickel and copper. The pricesPricing for these raw materials fluctuate depending onis governed by market conditions and globalmay fluctuate due to various factors outside of our control, such as supply and demand and market speculation. We strive to execute long-term supply contracts for these materials. Wesuch materials at competitive pricing when feasible, and we currently believe that we have adequate supplies or sources of availability of theaccess to raw materials necessarysupplies in order to meet the needs of our manufacturing and supply requirements.operations.

Energy Storage

Our energy storage products are manufactured at Gigafactory 1. We leverage the same supply chain process and infrastructure as we use for our vehicles. The battery architecture and many of the components used in our energy storage products are the same or similar to those used in our vehicles’ battery pack, enabling us to take advantage of manufacturing efficiencies and supply chain economies of scale. The power electronics and inverters for the Powerwall and Powerpack systems are also manufactured at Gigafactory 1, allowing us to ship deployment-ready systems directly to customers.

Solar Energy Systems

We currently purchase major components such as solar panels and inverters directly from multiple manufacturers. We typically purchase solar panels and inverters on an as-needed basis from our suppliers at then-prevailing prices pursuant to purchase orders issued under our master contractual arrangements. In December 2016, we entered into a long-term agreement with Panasonic to manufacture photovoltaic (“PV”) cells and modules at our Gigafactory 2 in Buffalo, New York, with negotiated pricing provisions and the intent to manufacture at least 1.0 gigawatt of solar panels annually. We have recently started manufacturing solar panels in Gigafactory 2 in collaboration with Panasonic.


Governmental Programs, Incentives and Regulations

VehiclesGlobally, both the operation of our business by us and the ownership of our products by our customers are impacted by various government programs, incentives and other arrangements. Our business and products are also subject to numerous governmental regulations that vary among jurisdictions.

Programs and Incentives

California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority Tax Incentives

We have entered into multiple agreements over the past few years with the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority (“CAEATFA”) that provide multi-year sales tax exclusions on purchases of manufacturing equipment that will be used for specific purposes, including the expansion and ongoing development of Model S, Model X, Model 3 and future electric vehicles and expansion of electric vehicle powertrain production in California.

Gigafactory Nevada—Nevada Tax Incentives

In connection with the construction of Gigafactory 1 in Nevada, we have entered into agreements with the State of Nevada and Storey County in Nevada that will provide abatements for sales and use taxes, real and personal property taxes, and employer excisespecified taxes, discounts to the base tariff energy rates and transferable tax credits.credits in consideration of capital investment and hiring targets that were met at Gigafactory Nevada. These incentives are available until June 2024 or June 2034, depending on the incentive.

Gigafactory New York—New York State Investment and Lease

We have a lease through the Research Foundation for the State University of New York (the “SUNY Foundation”) with respect to Gigafactory New York. Under the lease and a related research and development agreement, we are continuing to designate further buildouts at the facility. We are required to comply with certain covenants, including hiring and cumulative investment targets.

As we temporarily suspended most of our manufacturing operations at Gigafactory New York pursuant to a New York State executive order issued in March 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we were granted a one-year deferral of our obligation to be compliant with our applicable periods endingtargets under such agreement on JuneApril 30, 2034,2020, which was memorialized in an amendment to our agreement with the SUNY Foundation in July 2020.

Gigafactory Shanghai—Land Use Rights and Economic Benefits

We have an agreement with the local government of Shanghai for land use rights at Gigafactory Shanghai. Under the terms of the arrangement, we are required to meet a cumulative capital expenditure target and an annual tax revenue target starting at the end of 2023. In addition, the Shanghai government has granted to our Gigafactory Shanghai subsidiary in 2019 and 2020 certain incentives to be used in connection with eligible capital investments at Gigafactory Shanghai. Finally, the Shanghai government granted a beneficial corporate income tax rate of 15% to certain eligible enterprises, which is lower than the 25% statutory corporate income tax rate in China. Our Gigafactory Shanghai subsidiary was granted this lower rate for 2019 through 2023.


Gigafactory Berlin – Pending Grant

We have applied for a grant with the German government to improve the design, chemistry, manufacturing technology and recycling of lithium-ion battery cells for Gigafactory Berlin. The grant was approved by the European Commission in January 2021 and its implementation will be subject to capital investments by Tesla and its partners for a grant agreement with the German government.

Gigafactory 1 of at least $3.50 billion in the aggregate on or before June 30, 2024, which were met as of December 31, 2017, and certain other conditions specified in the agreements. If we do not satisfy one or more conditions under the agreements, Tesla will be required to repay to the respective taxing authorities the amounts of the tax incentives incurred, plus interest.

Tesla Regulatory CreditsTexas – Tax Incentives

In connection with the production, deliveryconstruction of Gigafactory Texas, we entered into a 20-year agreement with Travis County in Texas pursuant to which we would receive grant funding equal to 70-80% of property taxes paid by us to Travis County and placement into servicea separate 10-year agreement with the Del Valle Independent School District in Texas pursuant to which a portion of the taxable value of our zero emissionproperty would be capped at a specified amount, in each case subject to our meeting certain minimum economic development metrics through our construction and operations at Gigafactory Texas.

Regulatory Credits

We earn tradable credits in the operation of our business under various regulations related to zero-emission vehicles charging infrastructure(“ZEVs”), greenhouse gas, fuel economy, renewable energy and solar systems in global markets, we have earned and will continue to earn various tradable regulatory credits.clean fuel. We have soldsell these credits, and will continue to sell future credits, to automotive companies and regulated entities. For example, under California’s Zero-Emission Vehicle Regulation and those of states that have adopted California’s standard, vehicle manufacturers are required to earn or purchase credits for compliance with their annual regulatory requirements. These laws provide that automakers may bank excess credits, referred to as ZEV credits, if they earn more credits than the minimum quantity required by those laws. Manufacturers with a surplus of credits may sell their credits to other regulated parties. Pursuant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) national greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emission standards and similar standards adopted by the Canadian government, car and truck manufacturers are required to meet fleet-wide average carbon dioxide emissions standards. Manufacturers may sell excess credits to other manufacturers,entities who can use the credits to comply with theseemission standards, renewable energy procurement standards and other regulatory requirements. Many U.S. states have also adopted procurement requirements for renewable energy production. These requirements enable companies deploying solar energy to earn tradable credits known as Solar Renewable

Energy Certificates (“SRECs”).

Regulation—Vehicle SafetyStorage System Incentives and Testing

Our vehicles are subject to, and comply with or are otherwise exempt from, numerous regulatory requirements established by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”), including all applicable United States Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (“FMVSS”). Our vehicles fully comply with all applicable FMVSSs without the need for any exemptions, and we expect future Tesla vehicles to either fully comply or comply with limited exemptions related to new technologies. Additionally, there are regulatory changes being considered for several FMVSS, and while we anticipate compliance, there is no assurance until final regulation changes are enacted.

As a manufacturer, we must self-certify that our vehicles meet all applicable FMVSS, as well as the NHTSA bumper standard, or otherwise are exempt, before the vehicles can be imported or sold in the U.S. Numerous FMVSS apply to our vehicles, such as crash-worthiness requirements, crash avoidance requirements, and electric vehicle requirements. We are also required to comply with other federal laws administered by NHTSA, including the CAFE standards, Theft Prevention Act requirements, consumer information labeling requirements, Early Warning Reporting requirements regarding warranty claims, field reports, death and injury reports and foreign recalls, and owner’s manual requirements.

The Automobile Information and Disclosure Act requires manufacturers of motor vehicles to disclose certain information regarding the manufacturer’s suggested retail price, optional equipment and pricing. In addition, this


law allows inclusion of city and highway fuel economy ratings, as determined by EPA, as well as crash test ratings as determined by NHTSA if such tests are conducted.

Our vehicles sold outside of the U.S. are subject to foreign safety testing regulations. Many of those regulations are different from the federal motor vehicle safety standards applicable in the U.S. and may require redesign and/or retesting. The European Union has proposed new rules that, if approved, may significantly change the manner that vehicles are certified for compliance in Europe by creating more individual country-by-country type-approval requirements instead of the current singular Europe-wide system.

Regulation – Self Driving

There are no federal U.S. regulations pertaining to the safety of self-driving vehicles; however, NHTSA has established recommended guidelines. Certain U.S. states have legal restrictions on self-driving vehicles, and many other states are considering them. This patchwork increases legal complexity for our vehicles. In Europe, certain vehicle safety regulations apply to self-driving braking and steering systems, and certain treaties also restrict the legality of certain higher levels of self-driving vehicles. Self-driving laws and regulations are expected to continue to evolve in numerous jurisdictions in the U.S. and foreign countries and may create restrictions on our self-driving features.

Regulation—Battery Safety and Testing

Our battery pack conforms to mandatory regulations that govern transport of “dangerous goods”, defined to include lithium-ion batteries, which may present a risk in transportation. The regulations vary by mode of shipping transportation, such as by ocean vessel, rail, truck, or air. We have completed the applicable transportation tests for our battery packs, demonstrating our compliance with applicable regulations.

We use lithium-ion cells in our high voltage battery packs. The cells do not contain any lead, mercury, cadmium or heavy metals. Our battery packs include certain materials that contain trace amounts of hazardous chemicals whose use, storage, and disposal is regulated under federal law. We currently have an agreement with a third party battery recycling company to recycle our battery packs. 

Automobile Manufacturer and Dealer Regulation

State laws regulate the manufacture, distribution, and sale of automobiles, and generally require motor vehicle manufacturers and dealers to be licensed in order to sell vehicles directly to consumers in the state. As we open additional Tesla stores and service centers, we secure dealer licenses (or their equivalent) and engage in sales activities to sell our vehicles directly to consumers. A few states, such as Michigan and Connecticut, do not permit automobile manufacturers to be licensed as dealers or to act in the capacity of a dealer, or otherwise restrict a manufacturer’s ability to deliver or service vehicles. To sell vehicles to residents of states where we are not licensed as a dealer, we generally conduct the sale out of the state via the internet, phone or mail. In such states, we have opened “galleries” that serve an educational purpose and are not retail locations.

As we expand our retail footprint in the U.S., some automobile dealer trade associations have both challenged the legality of our operations in court and used administrative and legislative processes to attempt to prohibit or limit our ability to operate existing stores or expand to new locations. We expect that the dealer associations will continue to mount challenges to our business model. In addition, we expect the dealer associations to actively lobby state licensing agencies and legislators to interpret existing laws or enact new laws in ways not favorable to Tesla’s ownership and operation of its own retail and service locations, and we intend to actively fight any such efforts to limit our ability to sell our own vehicles.Policies

While we have analyzed the principal laws in the U.S., EU, China, Japan, UK, and Australia relating to our distribution model and believe we comply with such laws, we have not performed a complete analysis of all jurisdictions in which we may sell vehicles. Accordingly, there may be laws in certain jurisdictions that may restrict our sales and service operations.


Energy Storage

The regulatory regime for energy storage projects is still under development. Nevertheless,development, there are various policies, incentives and financial mechanisms at the federal, state and local levellevels that support the adoption of energy storage.

For example, energy storage systems that are charged using solar energy aremay be eligible for the 30%solar energy-related U.S. federal tax credit under Section 48(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or the IRC, ascredits described below. In addition, California and a number of other states have adopted procurement targets for energy storage, and behind the meter energy storage systems qualify for funding under the California Self Generation Incentive Program.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) has also taken steps to enable the participation of energy storage in wholesale energy markets. In 2011addition, California and 2013, FERC removed many barriersa number of other states have adopted procurement targets for systems like energy storage, to provide frequency regulation service, thus increasing the value these systems can obtain in wholesale energy markets. More recently, in late 2016, FERC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if it becomes a final rule, would further break down barriers preventing energy storage from fully participating in wholesale energy markets. Finally, in January 2017, FERC issued a statement supporting the use of energy storage as both electric transmission and as electric generation concurrently, thus enablingbehind-the-meter energy storage systems to provide greater value toqualify for funding under the electric grid.California Self Generation Incentive Program.

Solar Energy Systems

GovernmentSystem Incentives and Utility Programs and IncentivesPolicies

U.S. federal, state and local governments have established various policies, incentives and financial mechanisms to reduce the cost of solar energy and to accelerate the adoption of solar energy. These incentives include tax credits, cash grants, tax abatements and rebates.

The federal government currently provides an uncapped investment tax credit, or Federal ITC, under two sections of the IRC: SectionIn particular, Sections 48 and Section 25D. Section 48(a)(3) of the IRC allows a taxpayer to claim a credit of 30% of qualified expenditures for a commercial solar energy system that commences construction by December 31, 2019. The credit then declines to 26% in 2020, 22% in 2021, and a permanent 10% thereafter. We claim the Section 48 commercial credit when available for both our residential and commercial projects, based on ownership of the solar energy system. The federal government also provides accelerated depreciation for eligible commercial solar energy systems. Section 25D of the IRC allowsU.S. Internal Revenue Code currently provide a homeowner-taxpayer to claim atax credit of 30%26% of qualified commercial or residential expenditures for a residential solar energy system ownedsystems, which may be claimed by our customers for systems they purchase, or by us for arrangements where we own the systems. These tax credits are currently scheduled to decline and/or expire in 2023 and beyond.

Regulations

Vehicle Safety and Testing

In the U.S., our vehicles are subject to regulation by the homeownerNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”), including all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (“FMVSS”) and the NHTSA bumper standard. Numerous FMVSS apply to our vehicles, such as crash-worthiness requirements, crash avoidance requirements and electric vehicle requirements. While our current vehicles fully comply and we expect that is placedour vehicles in servicethe future will fully comply with all applicable FMVSS with limited or no exemptions, FMVSS are subject to change from time to time. As a manufacturer, we must self-certify that our vehicles meet all applicable FMVSS and the NHTSA bumper standard, or otherwise are exempt, before the vehicles may be imported or sold in the U.S.

We are also required to comply with other federal laws administered by December 31, 2019.NHTSA, including the CAFE standards, Theft Prevention Act requirements, consumer information labeling requirements, Early Warning Reporting requirements regarding warranty claims, field reports, death and injury reports and foreign recalls, owner’s manual requirements and additional requirements for cooperating with safety investigations and defect and recall reporting. The credit then declinesU.S. Automobile Information and Disclosure Act also requires manufacturers of motor vehicles to 26%disclose certain information regarding the manufacturer’s suggested retail price, optional equipment and pricing. In addition, federal law requires inclusion of fuel economy ratings, as determined by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”), and 5-star safety ratings as determined by NHTSA, if available.


Our vehicles sold outside of the U.S. are subject to similar foreign safety, environmental and other regulations. Many of those regulations are different from those applicable in the U.S. and may require redesign and/or retesting. Some of those regulations impact or prevent the rollout of new vehicle features. Additionally, the European Union has established new rules regarding additional compliance oversight that commenced in 2020, and 22%there is also regulatory uncertainty related to the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union.

Self-Driving Vehicles

Generally, laws pertaining to self-driving vehicles are evolving globally, and in 2021,some cases may create restrictions on self-driving features that we develop. While there are currently no federal U.S. regulations specifically pertaining to self-driving vehicles or self-driving equipment, NHTSA has published recommended guidelines on self-driving vehicles, and is scheduledretains the authority to expire thereafter. Customers who purchase their solar energy systems for cash investigate and/or through our solar loantake action on the safety of any vehicle, equipment or features operating on public roads. Certain U.S. states have legal restrictions on the operation, registration or licensure of self-driving vehicles, and many other states are eligibleconsidering them. This regulatory patchwork increases the legal complexity with respect to claimself-driving vehicles in the Section 25D investment tax credit.U.S.

In additionmarkets that follow the regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, some requirements restrict the design of advanced driver-assistance or self-driving features, which can compromise or prevent their use entirely. Other applicable laws, both current and proposed, may hinder the path and timeline to introducing self-driving vehicles for sale and use in the Federal ITC, manymarkets where they apply.

Other key markets, including China, continue to consider self-driving regulation. Any implemented regulations may differ materially from those in the U.S. and Europe, which may further increase the legal complexity of self-driving vehicles and limit or prevent certain features.

Automobile Manufacturer and Dealer Regulation

In the U.S., state laws regulate the manufacture, distribution, sale and service of automobiles, and generally require motor vehicle manufacturers and dealers to be licensed in order to sell vehicles directly to residents. Certain states offer personalhave asserted that the laws in such states do not permit automobile manufacturers to be licensed as dealers or to act in the capacity of a dealer, or that they otherwise restrict a manufacturer’s ability to deliver or service vehicles. To sell vehicles to residents of states where we are not licensed as a dealer, we generally conduct the transfer of title out of the state. In certain such states, we have opened “galleries” that serve an educational purpose and corporate tax creditswhere the title transfer may not occur.

Some automobile dealer trade associations have both challenged the legality of our operations in court and incentive available for solarused administrative and legislative processes to attempt to prohibit or limit our ability to operate existing stores or expand to new locations. Certain dealer associations have also actively lobbied state licensing agencies and legislators to interpret existing laws or enact new laws in ways not favorable to our ownership and operation of our own retail and service locations. We expect such challenges to continue, and we intend to actively fight any such efforts.

Battery Safety and Testing

Our battery packs are subject to various U.S. and international regulations that govern transport of “dangerous goods,” defined to include lithium-ion batteries, which may present a risk in transportation. We conduct testing to demonstrate our compliance with such regulations.

We use lithium-ion cells in our high voltage battery packs in our vehicles and energy systems.storage products. The use, storage and disposal of our battery packs are regulated under existing laws and are the subject of ongoing regulatory changes that may add additional requirements in the future. We have agreements with third party battery recycling companies to recycle our battery packs and we are also piloting our own recycling technology. 

Regulation – Solar Energy—General

We are not a “regulated utility” in the U.S., although we are subject to certain state and federal regulations applicable to solar and battery storage providers. To operate our systems, we obtainenter into standard interconnection agreements from thewith applicable utilities. In almost all cases, interconnection agreements are standard form agreements that have been pre-approved by the public utility commission or other regulatory body. 

Sales of electricity and non-sale equipment leases by third parties, such as our leases, PPAs and PPAs, facesubscription agreements, have faced regulatory challenges in some states and jurisdictions.

Regulation – Solar Energy—Net Metering

Thirty-eightMost states Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico have a regulatory policy known asin the U.S. make net energy metering, or net metering, available to solar customers. Net metering typically allows solar customers to interconnect their on-site solar energy systems to the utility grid and offset their utility electricity purchases by receiving a bill credit for excess energy generated by their solar energy system that is exported to the grid. Each of the states where we currently serve customers has adopted a net metering policy except for Texas, where certain individual utilities have adopted net metering or a policy similar to net metering. In certain jurisdictions, regulators or utilities have reduced or eliminated the benefit available under net metering or have proposed to do so.


Regulation – Mandated Renewable CapacityCompetition

Many states also have adopted procurement requirements for renewable energy production, such as an enforceable renewable portfolio standard, or RPS, or other policies that require covered entities to procure a specified percentage of total electricity delivered to customers in the state from eligible renewable energy sources, such as solar energy systems. In solar renewable energy certificate, or SREC, state markets, the RPS requires electricity suppliers to secure a portion of their electricity from solar generators. The SREC program provides a means for SRECs to be created. A SREC represents the renewable energy associated with 1,000 kWhs of electricity produced from a solar energy system. When a solar energy system generates 1,000 kWhs of electricity, one SREC is issued by a government agency, which can then be sold separately from the energy produced to covered entities who surrender the SRECs to the state to prove compliance with the state’s renewable energy mandate.

Competition

VehiclesAutomotive

The worldwide automotive market particularly for alternative fuel vehicles, is highly competitive and we expect it will become even more socompetitive in the future as we introduce additional vehicles including Model 3 which will compete with lower-priced vehicles.in a broader cross-section of the passenger and commercial vehicle market and expand our vehicles’ capabilities.

We believe that our vehicles compete in the market both based on their traditional segment classification as well as based on their propulsion technology. For example, Model S and Model X compete primarily in thewith premium sedans and premium SUVs and Model 3 and Model Y compete with small to medium-sized sedans and compact SUVs, which are extremely competitive premium sedan and premium SUV markets withmarkets. Competing products typically include internal combustion vehicles from more established automobile manufacturers, and Model 3 competes with small to medium-sized sedans. Our vehicles also compete with vehicles propelled by alternative fuels, principally electricity.

Manymanufacturers; however, many established and new automobile manufacturers have entered or have announced plans to enter the market for electric and other alternative fuel vehicle market.vehicles. Overall, we believe these announcements and vehicle introductions promote the development of the alternative fuelelectric vehicle market by highlighting the attractiveness of alternative fuelelectric vehicles particularly those fueled by electricity, relative to the internal combustion vehicle. Many major automobile manufacturers have electric vehicles available today in major markets including the U.S., China and Europe, and other current and prospective automobile manufacturers are also developing electric vehicles. Electric vehicles have also already been brought to market in China and other foreign countries and we expect a number of those manufacturers to enter the U.S. market as well. In addition, several manufacturers selloffer hybrid vehicles, including plug-in versions of their hybrid vehicles.versions. 

We also believe that there is increasing competition for our vehicle offerings as a platform for delivering self-driving technologies, charging solutions and other features and services, and we expect to compete in this developing market through continued progress on our Autopilot, FSD and neural network capabilities, Supercharger network and our infotainment offerings.

Energy Generation and Storage

Energy Storage Systems

The market for energy storage products is also highly competitive. Established companies, such as AES Energy Storage, Siemens, LG Chemcompetitive, and Samsung, as well as variousboth established and emerging companies have introduced products that are similar to our product portfolio. Thereportfolio or that are several companies providing individual componentsalternatives to the elements of energy storage systems (such as cells, battery modules, and power electronics) as well as others providing integratedour systems. We compete with these companies based on price, energy density and efficiency. We believe that the specifications and features of our products, our strong brand and the modular, scalable nature of our Powerpack 2 productenergy storage products give us a competitive advantage when marketingin our products.markets.

Solar Energy Systems

The primary competitors to our solar energy business are the traditional local utility companies that supply energy to our potential customers. We compete with these traditional utility companies primarily based on price, predictability of price and the ease by which customers can switch to electricity generated by our solar energy systems. We also compete with solar energy companies that provide products and services similar to ours. Many solar energy companies only install solar energy systems, while others only provide financing for these installations. InWe believe we have a significant expansion opportunity with our offerings and that the residential solarregulatory environment is increasingly conducive to the adoption of renewable energy system installation market,systems.

Intellectual Property

We place a strong emphasis on our primary competitors include Vivint Solar Inc., Sunrun Inc., Trinity Solar, SunPower Corporation,innovative approach and many smaller local solar companies.

Intellectual Property

proprietary designs which bring intrinsic value and uniqueness to our product portfolio.  As part of our business, we seek to protect ourthe underlying intellectual property rights of these innovations and designs such as with respect to patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and other measures, including through employee and third partythird-party nondisclosure agreements and


other contractual arrangements. Additionally,For example, we previously announcedplace a high priority on obtaining patents to provide the broadest and strongest possible protection to enable our freedom to operate our innovations and designs within our products and technologies in the electric vehicle market as well as to protect and defend our product portfolio. We have also adopted a patent policy in which we irrevocably pledged that we will not initiate a lawsuit against any party for infringing our patents through activity relating to electric vehicles or related equipment for so long as such party is acting in good faith. We made this pledge in order to encourage the advancement of a common, rapidly-evolving platform for electric vehicles, thereby benefiting ourselves, other companies making electric vehicles and the world.

Segment Information

We operate as two reportable segments: automotive and energy generation and storage.

The automotive segment includes the design, development, manufacturing, and sales of electric vehicles. The energy generation and storage segment includes the design, manufacture, installation, and sale or lease of stationary energy storage products and solar energy systems, and sale of electricity generated by our solar energy systems to customers.

EmployeesHuman Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017, Tesla, Inc. had 37,5432020, our full-time employees.count for our and our subsidiaries’ employees worldwide was 70,757. To date, we have not experienced any work stoppages as a result of labor disputes, and we consider our relationship with our employees to be good. Our key human capital objectives in managing our business include attracting, developing and retaining top talent while integrating diversity, equity and inclusion principles and practices into our core values.


We want to attract a pool of diverse and exceptional candidates and support their career growth once they become employees. Our efforts begin at the entry level with development, apprenticeship and internship programs in local high schools, community colleges and four-year colleges. In addition, we seek to hire based on talent rather than solely on educational pedigree, and have provided thousands of job openings, including in our local communities, for capable workers from various backgrounds to learn valuable skills in critical operations such as in manufacturing, vehicle service and energy product installation. We also emphasize in our evaluation and career development efforts internal mobility opportunities for employees to drive professional development. Our goal is a long-term, upward-bound career at Tesla for every employee, which we believe also drives our retention efforts.

We also believe that our ability to retain our workforce is dependent on our ability to foster an environment that is sustainably safe, respectful, fair and inclusive of everyone and promotes diversity, equity and inclusion inside and outside of our business. From our outreach to Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Hispanic Serving Institutions to sponsoring employee resource groups across numerous locations, including Asian Pacific Islanders at Tesla, Black at Tesla, Intersectionality, Latinos at Tesla, LGBTQ at Tesla, Veterans at Tesla and Women in Tesla, we engage these networks as key business resources and sources of actionable feedback. We are also working on diversity efforts in our supply chain to expand our outreach and support to small- and large-scale suppliers from underrepresented communities to emphasize this culture with our own employees.

Available Information

We file or furnish periodic reports and amendments thereto, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Such reports, amendments, proxy statements and other information may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically. Our website is located at www.tesla.com, and our reports, amendments thereto, proxy statements and other information are also made available, free of charge, on our investor relations website at ir.tesla.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such information with the SEC. The information posted on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 


ITEM 1A.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks described below together with the other information set forth in this report, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and future results. The risks described below are not the only risks facing our company. Risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Risks Related to Our Ability to Grow Our Business and Industry

We may be impacted by macroeconomic conditions resulting from the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Since the first quarter of 2020, there has been a worldwide impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. Government regulations and shifting social behaviors have limited or closed non-essential transportation, government functions, business activities and person-to-person interactions. In some cases, the relaxation of such trends has recently been followed by actual or contemplated returns to stringent restrictions on gatherings or commerce, including in parts of the U.S. and a number of areas in Europe.

We temporarily suspended operations at each of our manufacturing facilities worldwide for a part of the first half of 2020. Some of our suppliers and partners also experienced temporary suspensions before resuming, including Panasonic, which manufactures battery cells for our products at our Gigafactory Nevada. We also instituted temporary employee furloughs and compensation reductions while our U.S. operations were scaled back. Reduced operations or closures at motor vehicle departments, vehicle auction houses and municipal and utility company inspectors have resulted in challenges in or postponements for our new vehicle deliveries, used vehicle sales and energy product deployments. Global trade conditions and consumer trends may further adversely impact us and our industries. For example, pandemic-related issues have exacerbated port congestion and intermittent supplier shutdowns and delays, resulting in additional expenses to expedite delivery of critical parts. Similarly, increased demand for personal electronics has created a shortfall of microchip supply, and it is yet unknown how we may be impacted. Sustaining our production trajectory will require the readiness and solvency of our suppliers and vendors, a stable and motivated production workforce and ongoing government cooperation, including for travel and visa allowances. The contingencies inherent in the past,construction of and ramp at new facilities such as Gigafactory Shanghai, Gigafactory Berlin and Gigafactory Texas may experience inbe exacerbated by these challenges.

We cannot predict the future, delaysduration or other complications indirection of current global trends, the design, manufacture, launchsustained impact of which is largely unknown, is rapidly evolving and has varied across geographic regions. Ultimately, we continue to monitor macroeconomic conditions to remain flexible and to optimize and evolve our business as appropriate, and we will have to accurately project demand and infrastructure requirements globally and deploy our production, ramp of new vehiclesworkforce and other productsresources accordingly. If current global market conditions continue or worsen, or if we cannot or do not maintain operations at a scope that is commensurate with such as Model 3,conditions or are later required to or choose to suspend such operations again, our energy storage products and the Solar Roof, which could harm our brand, business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.results may be harmed.

We may experience delays in launching and ramping the production of our products and features, or we may be unable to control our manufacturing costs.

We have previously experienced and may in the future experience launch manufacturing and production ramp delays or other complications in connection withfor new vehicle models such as Model S, Model Xproducts and Model 3, and new vehicle features such as the all-wheel drive dual motor drivetrain on Model S and the second version of autopilot hardware.features. For example, we encountered unanticipated supplier issues that led to delays during the ramp of Model X and experienced challenges with a supplier and with ramping full automation for certain of our initial Model 3 manufacturing processes. In addition, we may introduce in the future new or unique manufacturing processes and design features for our products. There is no guarantee that we will be able to successfully and timely introduce and scale such processes or features.

In particular, our future business depends in large part on increasing the production of mass-market vehicles including Model 3 and Model Y, which we are planning to achieve through multiple factories worldwide. We have relatively limited experience to date in manufacturing Model 3 and Model Y at high volumes and even less experience building and ramping vehicle production lines across multiple factories in different geographies. In order to be successful, we will need to implement, maintain and ramp efficient and cost-effective manufacturing capabilities, processes and supply chains and achieve the design tolerances, high quality and output rates we have planned at our manufacturing facilities in California, Nevada, Texas, China and Germany. We will also need to hire, train and compensate skilled employees to operate these facilities. Bottlenecks and other unexpected challenges such as certain supply chain constraints, that ledthose we experienced in the past may arise during our production ramps, and we must address them promptly while continuing to initialimprove manufacturing processes and reducing costs. If we are not successful in achieving these goals, we could face delays in producing Model X. Similarly, we have experienced certain bottlenecks in the production ofestablishing and/or sustaining our Model 3 in places like the battery module assembly line at Gigafactory 1, leadingand Model Y ramps or be unable to delays in its ramp. If such issues continue longer than expected, or new issues arise or recur with respect to Model 3 or any ofmeet our other production vehicles, we could experience further delays. In addition, because our vehicle models share certain production facilities with other models, the volume or efficiency of production with respect to one model may impact the production of other models.related cost and profitability targets.

We may also experience similar future delays or other complications in bringing to market andlaunching and/or ramping production of new vehicles, such as our Tesla Semi truck, our planned Model Y and new Tesla Roadster, our energy storage products and Solar Roof; new product versions or variants; new vehicles such as Tesla Semi, Cybertruck and the Solar Roof. new Tesla Roadster; and future features and services such as new Autopilot or FSD features and the autonomous Tesla ride-hailing network. Likewise, we may encounter delays with the design, construction and regulatory or other approvals necessary to build and bring online future manufacturing facilities and products.


Any significant additional delay or other complication in ramping the production of our current products or the development, manufacture, launch and production ramp of our future products, including complications associatedfeatures and services, or in doing so cost-effectively and with expandinghigh quality, may harm our brand, business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

We may be unable to grow our global product sales, delivery and installation capabilities and our servicing and vehicle charging networks, or we may be unable to accurately project and effectively manage our growth.

Our success will depend on our ability to continue to expand our sales capabilities. We also frequently adjust our retail operations and product offerings in order to optimize our reach, costs, product line-up and model differentiation and customer experience. However, there is no guarantee that such steps will be accepted by consumers accustomed to traditional sales strategies. For example, marketing methods such as touchless test drives that we have pioneered in certain markets have not been proven at scale. We are targeting with Model 3 and Model Y a global mass demographic with a broad range of potential customers, in which we have relatively limited experience projecting demand and pricing our products. We currently produce numerous international variants at a limited number of factories, and if our specific demand expectations for these variants prove inaccurate, we may not be able to timely generate deliveries matched to the vehicles that we produce in the same timeframe or that are commensurate with the size of our operations in a given region. Likewise, as we develop and grow our energy products and services worldwide, our success will depend on our ability to correctly forecast demand in various markets.

Because we do not have independent dealer networks, we are responsible for delivering all of our vehicles to our customers. While we have improved our delivery logistics, we may face difficulties with deliveries at increasing volumes, particularly in international markets requiring significant transit times. For example, we saw challenges in ramping our logistics channels in China and Europe to initially deliver Model 3 there in the first quarter of 2019. We have deployed a number of delivery models, such as deliveries to customers’ homes and workplaces and touchless deliveries, but there is no guarantee that such models will be scalable or be accepted globally. Likewise, as we ramp Solar Roof, we are working to substantially increase installation personnel and decrease installation times. If we are not successful in matching such capabilities with actual production, or if we experience unforeseen production delays or inaccurately forecast demand for the Solar Roof, our business, financial condition and operating results may be harmed.

Moreover, because of our unique expertise with our vehicles, we recommend that our vehicles be serviced by us or by certain authorized professionals. If we experience delays in adding such servicing capacity or servicing our vehicles efficiently, or experience unforeseen issues with the reliability of our vehicles, particularly higher-volume and supply chainnewer additions to our fleet such as Model 3 and Model Y, it could overburden our servicing capabilities and parts inventory. Similarly, the increasing number of Tesla vehicles also requires us to continue to rapidly increase the number of our Supercharger stations and connectors throughout the world.

There is no assurance that we will be able to ramp our business to meet our sales, delivery, installation, servicing and vehicle charging targets globally, that our projections on which such targets are based will prove accurate or obtainingthat the pace of growth or maintainingcoverage of our customer infrastructure network will meet customer expectations. These plans require significant cash investments and management resources and there is no guarantee that they will generate additional sales or installations of our products, or that we will be able to avoid cost overruns or be able to hire additional personnel to support them. As we expand, we will also need to ensure our compliance with regulatory approvals, could materially damagerequirements in various jurisdictions applicable to the sale, installation and servicing of our products, the sale or dispatch of electricity related to our energy products and the operation of Superchargers. If we fail to manage our growth effectively, it may harm our brand, business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

We may experience delaysOur future growth and success are dependent upon consumers’ demand for electric vehicles and specifically our vehicles in realizing our projected timelinesan automotive industry that is generally competitive, cyclical and cost volatile.

If the market for electric vehicles in general and volume targets for the production and ramp of our Model 3 vehicle, which could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

Our future business depends Tesla vehicles in large part on our ability to execute on our plans to manufacture, market and sell the Model 3 vehicle, whichparticular does not develop as we are offering at a lower price point and which we intend to produce at significantly higher volumes than our present production capabilities for the Model S or Model X vehicles. We commenced production and initial customer deliveries of Model 3 in July 2017 and are targeting a forecasted production rate of 5,000 Model 3 vehicles per week by the end of the second quarter of 2018.

We have no experience to date in manufacturing vehicles at the high volumes that we anticipate for Model 3, and to be successful, we will need to complete the implementation and ramp of efficient and cost-effective manufacturing capabilities, processes and supply chains necessary to support such volumes. We are employing a higher degree of automation in our materials conveyance, battery module production and other manufacturing processes for Model 3expect, develops more slowly than we have previously employed, and in some cases we have implemented interim processes such as semi-automated manufacturing lines, for which we are likely to incur additional labor costs until we bring online our fully automated processes. Moreover, our Model 3 production plan has generally required and will require significant investments of cash and management resources.

Our production plan for Model 3 is based on many key assumptions, including:

that we will be able to complete ramping high volume production of Model 3 at the Tesla Factory without exceeding our projected costs and on our projected timeline;

that we will be able to continue to expand Gigafactory 1 in a timely manner to produce high volumes of quality lithium-ion cells to be integrated into battery modules and finished battery packs and drive unit components for Model 3, all at costs that allow us to sell Model 3 at our target gross margins;


that the equipment and processes which we have selected for Model 3 production will be able to accurately manufacture high volumes of Model 3 vehicles within specified design tolerances and with high quality;

that we will be able to maintain suppliers for the necessary components on terms and conditions that are acceptable to us and that we will be able to obtain components on a timely basis and in the necessary quantities to support high volume production; and

that we will be able to attract, recruit, hire, train and retain skilled employees, including employees on the production line, to operate our planned high volume production facilities to support Model 3, including at the Tesla Factory and Gigafactory 1.

If oneexpect, or more of the foregoing assumptions turns out to be incorrect, our ability to meet our Model 3 projections on time and at volumes and prices that are profitable, the number of current and future Model 3 reservations, as well as our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition, may be materially and adversely impacted.

We may be unable to meet our growing vehicle production and delivery plans, both of which could harm our business and prospects.

Our plans call for significant increases in vehicle production and deliveries to high volumes in a short amount of time. Our ability to achieve these plans will depend upon a number of factors, including our ability to utilize installed manufacturing capacity, achieve the planned production yield and further increase capacity as planned while maintaining our desired quality levels and optimize design and production changes, and our suppliers’ ability to support our needs. In addition, we have used and may use in the future a number of new manufacturing technologies, techniques and processesif demand for our vehicles which we must successfully introduce and scale for high volume production. For example, we have introduced highly automated production lines, aluminum spot welding systems and high-speed blow forming of certain difficult to stamp vehicle parts. We have also introduced unique design featuresdecreases in our markets or our vehicles compete with different manufacturing challenges, such as large display screens, dual motor drivetrain, autopilot hardware and falcon-wing doors. We have limited experience developing, manufacturing, selling and servicing, and allocatingeach other, our available resources among, multiple products simultaneously. If we are unable to realize our plans, our brand, business, prospects, financial condition and operating results may be harmed.

We are still at an earlier stage and have limited resources and production relative to established competitors that offer internal combustion engine vehicles. In addition, electric vehicles still comprise a small percentage of overall vehicle sales. As a result, the market for our vehicles could be materially damaged.negatively affected by numerous factors, such as:

perceptions about electric vehicle features, quality, safety, performance and cost;

perceptions about the limited range over which electric vehicles may be driven on a single battery charge, and access to charging facilities;

competition, including from other types of alternative fuel vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and high fuel-economy internal combustion engine vehicles;

volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline, such as wide fluctuations in crude oil prices during 2020;


government regulations and economic incentives; and

concerns about our future viability.

Finally, the target demographics for our vehicles, particularly Model 3 and Model Y, are highly competitive. Sales of vehicles in the automotive industry tend to be cyclical in many markets, which may expose us to further volatility as we expand and adjust our operations and retail strategies. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively impact the transportation and automotive industries long-term. It is uncertain as to how such macroeconomic factors will impact us as a company that has been experiencing growth and increasing market share in an industry that has globally been experiencing a recent decline in sales.

ConcurrentOur suppliers may fail to deliver components according to schedules, prices, quality and volumes that are acceptable to us, or we may be unable to manage these components effectively.

Our products contain thousands of parts that we purchase globally from hundreds of mostly single-source direct suppliers, generally without long-term supply agreements. This exposes us to multiple potential sources of component shortages, such as those that we experienced in 2012 and 2016 with our Model S and Model X ramps. Unexpected changes in business conditions, materials pricing, labor issues, wars, governmental changes, tariffs, natural disasters such as the March 2011 earthquakes in Japan, health epidemics such as the global COVID-19 pandemic, trade and shipping disruptions and other factors beyond our or our suppliers’ control could also affect these suppliers’ ability to deliver components to us or to remain solvent and operational. For example, a global shortage of microchips has been reported since early 2021, and the impact to us is yet unknown. The unavailability of any component or supplier could result in production delays, idle manufacturing facilities, product design changes and loss of access to important technology and tools for producing and supporting our products. Moreover, significant planned increaseincreases in our vehicle production, levels, we will also need to continue to significantly increase deliveries of, and servicing capacity for, our vehicles. Although we have a plan for delivering and servicing significantly increased volumes of vehicles, we have limited experience in delivering a high volume of vehicles, and no experience in delivering and servicing vehicles at the significantly higher volumes we anticipatesuch as for Model 3 and weModel Y, or product design changes by us have required and may face difficulties meeting our delivery and growth plans into both existing markets as well as new markets into which we expand. If we are unable to ramp up to meet our delivery and servicing needs globally, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

We are dependent on our suppliers,in the majority of which are single source suppliers, and the inability of these suppliers to deliver necessary components of our products according to our schedule and at prices, quality levels, and volumes acceptable to us, or our inability to efficiently manage these components, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

Our products contain numerous purchased parts which we source globally from hundreds of direct suppliers, the majority of whom are currently single source suppliers, although we attempt to qualify and obtain components from multiple sources whenever feasible. Any significant unanticipated demand wouldfuture require us to procure additional components in a short amount of time,time. Our suppliers may not be willing or able to sustainably meet our timelines or our cost, quality and in the pastvolume needs, or to do so may cost us more, which may require us to replace them with other sources. Finally, we have also replaced certain suppliers becauselimited vehicle manufacturing experience outside of their failure to provide components that metthe Fremont Factory and we may experience issues increasing the level of localized procurement at our quality control standards.Gigafactory Shanghai and at future factories such as Gigafactory Berlin and Gigafactory Texas. While we believe that we will be able to secure additional or alternate sources of supplyor develop our own replacements for most of our components, in a relatively short time frame, there is no assurance that we will be able to do so quickly or develop our own replacements for certain highly customized components of our products. Moreover,at all. Additionally, we have signed long-term agreements with Panasonic tomay be our manufacturing partner and supplier for lithium-ion cells at Gigafactory 1 in Nevada and PV cells and panels at Gigafactory 2 in Buffalo, New York. If we encounter unexpected difficulties with key suppliers such as Panasonic,


and if we are unable to fill these needs from other suppliers, we could experience production delays and potential loss of access to important technology and parts for producing, servicing and supporting our products.

This limited, and in many cases single source, supply chain exposes us to multiple potential sources of delivery failure or component shortages for the production of our products, such as those which we experienced in 2012 and 2016 in connection with our slower-than-planned Model S and Model X ramps. Furthermore, unexpected changes in business conditions, materials pricing, labor issues, wars, governmental changes, natural disasters such as the March 2011 earthquakes in Japan and other factors beyond our and our suppliers’ control, could also affect our suppliers’ ability to deliver components to us on a timely basis. The loss of any single or limited source supplier or the disruption in the supply of components from these suppliers could lead to product design changes and delays in product deliveries to our customers, which could hurt our relationships with our customers and result in negative publicity, damage to our brand and a material and adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

Changesunsuccessful in our supply chain have also resulted in the past, and may result in the future, in increased cost. We have also experienced cost increases from certain of our suppliers in ordercontinuous efforts to meet our quality targets and development timelines as well as due to design changes that we made, and we may experience similar cost increases in the future. Certain suppliers have sought to renegotiate the terms of the supply arrangements. Additionally, we are negotiatingnegotiate with existing suppliers forto obtain cost reductions seeking new and avoid unfavorable changes to terms, source less expensive suppliers for certain parts and attempting to redesign certain parts to make them less expensive to produce. If we are unsuccessful inAny of these occurrences may harm our efforts to controlbusiness, prospects, financial condition and reduce supplier costs, our operating results will suffer. results.

The foregoing discussion applies to Model 3 and our energy storage products as well. However, because we plan to produce Model 3 at significantly higher volumes than Model S or Model X, the negative impact of any delays or other constraints with respect to our suppliers for Model 3 could be substantially greater than any such issues experienced with respect to our other products. As some of our suppliers for Model S and Model X do not have the resources, equipment or capability to provide components for the Model 3 in line with our requirements, we have engaged a significant number of new suppliers, and we need such suppliers to ramp and deliver according to our schedule. There is no assurance that these suppliers will ultimately be able to meet our cost, quality and volume needs, or do so at the times needed. Furthermore, as the scale of our vehicle production increases, we will also need to accurately forecast, purchase, warehouse and transport components at high volumes to our manufacturing facilities components at much higher volumes than we have experience with.and servicing locations internationally. If we are unable to accurately match the timing and quantities of component purchases to our actual needs or successfully implement automation, inventory management and other systems to accommodate the increased complexity in our supply chain and parts management, we may incur unexpected production disruption, storage, transportation and write-off costs, which couldmay harm our business and operating results.

We may be unable to meet our projected construction timelines, costs and production ramps at new factories, or we may experience difficulties in generating and maintaining demand for products manufactured there.

Our ability to increase production of our vehicles on a sustained basis, make them affordable globally by accessing local supply chains and workforces and streamline delivery logistics is dependent on the construction and ramp of Gigafactory Shanghai, Gigafactory Berlin and Gigafactory Texas. The construction of and commencement and ramp of production at these factories are subject to a number of uncertainties inherent in all new manufacturing operations, including ongoing compliance with regulatory requirements, procurement and maintenance of construction, environmental and operational licenses and approvals for additional expansion, potential supply chain constraints, hiring, training and retention of qualified employees and the pace of bringing production equipment and processes online with the capability to manufacture high-quality units at scale. For example, we are currently constructing Gigafactory Berlin under conditional permits. Moreover, we intend to incorporate sequential design and manufacturing changes into vehicles manufactured at each new factory. We have a material adverse effect onlimited experience to date with developing and implementing vehicle manufacturing innovations outside of the Fremont Factory, as we only recently began production at Gigafactory Shanghai. In particular, the majority of our design and engineering resources are currently located in California. In order to meet our expectations for our new factories, we must expand and manage localized design and engineering talent and resources. If we experience any issues or delays in meeting our projected timelines, costs, capital efficiency and production capacity for our new factories, expanding and managing teams to implement iterative design and production changes there, maintaining and complying with the terms of any debt financing that we obtain to fund them or generating and maintaining demand for the vehicles we manufacture there, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition may be harmed.


We will need to maintain and operating results.significantly grow our access to battery cells, including through the development and manufacture of our own cells, and control our related costs.

Our future growth and success isWe are dependent upon consumers’ willingness to adopt electricon the continued supply of lithium-ion battery cells for our vehicles and specificallyenergy storage products, and we will require substantially more cells to grow our business according to our plans. Currently, we rely on suppliers such as Panasonic for these cells. However, we have to date fully qualified only a very limited number of such suppliers and have limited flexibility in changing suppliers. Any disruption in the supply of battery cells from our suppliers could limit production of our vehicles especially inand energy storage products. In the mass market demographiclong term, we intend to supplement cells from our suppliers with cells manufactured by us, which we are targeting with Model 3.

Our growth is highly dependent upon the adoption by consumers of alternative fuel vehicles in generalbelieve will be more efficient, manufacturable at greater volumes and electric vehicles in particular. Although wecost-effective than currently available cells. However, our efforts to develop and manufacture such battery cells have successfully grown demand for Model Srequired and Model X, have seen very strong initial demand for Model 3,may require significant investments, and believethere can be no assurance that we will be able to continueachieve these targets in the timeframes that we have planned or at all. If we are unable to growdo so, we may have to curtail our planned vehicle and energy storage product production or procure additional cells from suppliers at potentially greater costs, either of which may harm our business and operating results.

In addition, the cost of battery cells, whether manufactured by our suppliers or by us, depends in part upon the prices and availability of raw materials such as lithium, nickel, cobalt and/or other metals. The prices for these materials fluctuate and their available supply may be unstable, depending on market conditions and global demand separately for eachthese materials, including as a result of increased global production of electric vehicles and energy storage products. Any reduced availability of these materials may impact our access to cells and any increases in their prices may reduce our profitability if we cannot recoup the increased costs through increased vehicle prices. Moreover, any such attempts to increase product prices may harm our brand, prospects and operating results.

We face strong competition for our products and services from a growing list of established and new competitors.

The worldwide automotive market is highly competitive today and we expect it will become even more so in the future. For example, Model 3 and Model Y face competition from existing and future vehicles, there is no guarantee of such future demand or that our vehicles will not compete with one anotherautomobile manufacturers in the market. Moreover, the mass market demographic which weextremely competitive entry-level premium sedan and compact SUV markets. A significant and growing number of established and new automobile manufacturers, as well as other companies, have entered or are targeting with Model 3 is larger, but more competitive, than the demographic for Model S and Model X, and additional electric vehicles are entering the market.

Ifreported to have plans to enter the market for electric and other alternative fuel vehicles, including hybrid, plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles, as well as the market for self-driving technology and other vehicle applications and software platforms. In some cases, our competitors offer or will offer electric vehicles in generalimportant markets such as China and TeslaEurope, and/or have announced an intention to produce electric vehicles exclusively at some point in particular does not develop as we expect,the future. Many of our competitors have significantly greater or develops more slowlybetter-established resources than we expect, or if demand fordo to devote to the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion, sale and support of their products. Increased competition could result in our vehicles decreases in keylower vehicle unit sales, price reductions, revenue shortfalls, loss of customers and other markets,loss of market share, which may harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results could be harmed. The market for alternative fuel vehicles is relatively new, rapidly evolving,results.

We also face competition in our energy generation and could be affected by numerous external factors, such as:

perceptions about electric vehicle features, quality, safety, performancestorage business from other manufacturers, developers, installers and cost;

perceptions about the limited range over which electric vehicles may be driven on a single battery charge;


competition, including from other types of alternative fuel vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, and high fuel-economy internal combustion engine vehicles;

volatilityservice providers of competing energy systems, as well as from large utilities. Decreases in the costretail or wholesale prices of oilelectricity from utilities or other renewable energy sources could make our products less attractive to customers and gasoline;

government regulationslead to an increased rate of residential customer defaults under our existing long-term leases and economic incentives; andPPAs.

access

Risks Related to charging facilities.Our Operations

Future problemsWe may experience issues with lithium-ion cells or delays in expandingother components manufactured at Gigafactory 1 or ramping operations there could negatively affectNevada, which may harm the production and profitability of our products, such as Model 3.vehicle and energy storage products.

To lowerOur plan to grow the costvolume and profitability of cell production and produce cells in high volume, we have vertically integrated the production of lithium-ion cells and finished battery packs for Model 3our vehicles and energy storage products depends on significant lithium-ion battery cell production by our partner Panasonic at Gigafactory 1. While Gigafactory 1 began producing lithium-ion cells for energy storage products in January 2017 and has since begun producing lithium-ion cells for Model 3, we have no other direct experience in the production of lithium-ion cells. Given the size and complexity of this undertaking, it is possible that future events could result in the cost of expanding and operating Gigafactory 1 exceeding our current expectations and Gigafactory 1 taking longer to ramp production and expand than we currently anticipate. In order to reach our planned volume and gross margin for Model 3, we must have significant cell production from Gigafactory 1, which, among other things, requires Panasonic to successfully ramp its all-new cell production lines to significant volumes over a short period of time.Nevada. Although Panasonic has a long track record of producing high-quality cells at significant volume at its factories in Japan, it has never before started and rampedrelatively limited experience with cell production at a factoryGigafactory Nevada, which began in the U.S. like2017. Moreover, although Panasonic is co-located with us at Gigafactory 1.Nevada, it is free to make its own operational decisions, such as its determination to temporarily suspend its manufacturing there in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we have started producingproduce several vehicle components, for Model 3, such as battery modules and packs incorporating the lithium-ion cells produced by Panasonic for Model 3 and Model Y and drive units (including to support Gigafactory Shanghai production), at Gigafactory 1. SomeNevada, and we also manufacture energy storage products there. In the past, some of the manufacturing lines for suchcertain product components have takentook longer than anticipated to ramp to their full capacity. We expect thatcapacity, and additional bottlenecks may arise in the future as we will continue to experience challenges as we move throughincrease the ramp,production rate and we will continue to fine-tune our manufacturing lines to address them. While we currently believe that we will reach our production targets, if we are unable to resolve ramping challenges and expand Gigafactory 1 production in a timely manner and at reasonable prices, and ifintroduce new lines. If we or Panasonic are unable to attract,or otherwise do not maintain and grow our respective operations at Gigafactory Nevada production, or if we are unable to do so cost-effectively or hire and retain a substantial number of highly skilledhighly-skilled personnel there, our ability to supplymanufacture our products profitably would be limited, which may harm our business and operating results.

Finally, the high volumes of lithium-ion cells and battery modules and packs manufactured at Gigafactory Nevada are stored and recycled at our various facilities. Any mishandling of battery cells may cause disruption to the operation of such facilities. While


we have implemented safety procedures related to the handling of the cells, there can be no assurance that a safety issue or other components for Model 3 andfire related to the cells would not disrupt our other products could be negatively impacted.operations. Any such problemsdisruptions or delays with Gigafactory 1 could negatively affectissues may harm our brand and business.

We face risks associated with maintaining and expanding our international operations, including unfavorable and uncertain regulatory, political, economic, tax and labor conditions.

We are subject to legal and regulatory requirements, political uncertainty and social, environmental and economic conditions in numerous jurisdictions, over which we have little control and which are inherently unpredictable. Our operations in such jurisdictions, particularly as a company based in the U.S., create risks relating to conforming our products to regulatory and safety requirements and charging and other electric infrastructures; organizing local operating entities; establishing, staffing and managing foreign business locations; attracting local customers; navigating foreign government taxes, regulations and permit requirements; enforceability of our contractual rights; trade restrictions, customs regulations, tariffs and price or exchange controls; and preferences in foreign nations for domestically manufactured products. Such conditions may increase our costs, impact our ability to sell our products and require significant management attention, and may harm our business prospects, financial condition and operating results.if we unable to manage them effectively.

IfOur business may suffer if our vehiclesproducts or other products that we sell or installfeatures contain defects, fail to perform as expected our abilityor take longer than expected to develop, market and sell our products and services could be harmed.become fully functional.

If our vehiclesproducts contain design or our energy products were to containmanufacturing defects in design and manufacture that cause them not to perform as expected or that require repair, or certain features of our vehicles such as full self-driving,new Autopilot or FSD features take longer than expected to become enabled, or are legally restricted or become subject to onerous regulation, our ability to develop, market and sell our products and services couldmay be harmed. For example, the operationharmed, and we may experience delivery delays, product recalls, product liability, breach of warranty and consumer protection claims and significant warranty and other expenses. In particular, our vehicles isproducts are highly dependent on software, which is inherently complex and could conceivablymay contain latent defects andor errors or be subject to external attacks. Issues experienced by our customers have included those related to the software for the 17 inchModel S and Model X 17-inch display screen, the panoramic roof and the 12 volt12-volt battery in the Model S, and the seats and doors in the Model X.X and the operation of solar panels installed by us. Although we attempt to remedy any issues we observe in our products as effectively and rapidly as possible, such efforts may not be timely, may hamper production or may not be up to the satisfaction ofcompletely satisfy our customers. While we have performed extensive internal testing on theour products we manufacture,and features, we currently have a limited frame of reference by which to evaluate detailedtheir long-term quality, reliability, durability and performance characteristics of our battery packs, powertrains, vehicles and energy storage products.characteristics. There can be no assurance that we will be able to detect and fix any defects in our products prior to their sale to or installation for consumers.customers.

AnyWe may be required to defend or insure against product defects, delays or legal restrictions on product features, or other failure of our products to perform as expected could harm our reputation and result in delivery delays, product recalls,liability claims.

The automobile industry generally experiences significant product liability claims, significant warranty and other expenses, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. Model 3 has not yet been evaluated by NHTSA for a star rating underas such we face the New Car Assessment Program, and while based on our internal evaluation we expect to obtain comparable ratings to those achieved by Model S and Model X, there is no assurance this will occur.


If we fail to scale our business operations and otherwise manage future growth and adapt to new conditions effectively as we rapidly grow our company, including internationally, we may not be able to produce, market, sell and service our products successfully.

Any failure to manage our growth effectively could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. We continue to expand our operations significantly, including internationally, including by a transition to high volume vehicle production with the ramprisk of Model 3 and the worldwide sales, delivery and servicing of a significantly higher number of vehicles than our current vehicle fleetsuch claims in the coming years. Furthermore, we are developing and growing our energy storage product and solar business worldwide, including in countries where we have limited or no previous operating experience in connection with our vehicle business. Our future operating results depend to a large extent on our ability to manage our expansion and growth successfully. We may not be successful in undertaking this global expansion if we are unable to control expenses and avoid cost overruns and other unexpected operating costs; establish sufficient worldwide automobile sales, delivery, service and Supercharger facilities in a timely manner; adapt our products and conduct our operations to meet local requirements; implement the required infrastructure, systems and processes; and find and hire a significant number of additional manufacturing, engineering, service, electrical installation, construction and administrative personnel.

If we are unable to achieve our targeted manufacturing costs forevent our vehicles including Model 3,do not perform or are claimed to not have performed as expected. As is true for other automakers, our financial conditionvehicles have been involved and operating results will suffer.

While we have experienced and expect in the future to realize cost reductions by both us and our suppliers, there is no guarantee we will be able to achieve sufficient cost savings to reach our gross margininvolved in accidents resulting in death or personal injury, and profitability goals.such accidents where Autopilot or FSD features are engaged are the subject of significant public attention. We incur significant costs related to procuring the materials required to manufacture our vehicles, assembling vehicleshave experienced and compensating our personnel. We may also incur substantial costs or cost overruns in utilizing and increasing the production capability of our vehicle manufacturing facilities, such as for Model 3. Furthermore, if we are unable to achieve production cost targets on our vehicles pursuant to our plans, we may not be able to meet our gross margin and other financial targets. Many of the factors that impact our manufacturing costs are beyond our control, such as potential increases in the costs of our materials and components, such as lithium, nickel, and other components of our battery cells or aluminum used to produce body panels. If we are unableexpect to continue to control and reduce our manufacturing costs, our operating results, business and prospects will be harmed.

We are significantly dependent upon revenue generatedface claims arising from the saleor related to misuse or claimed failures of a limited fleet of electric vehicles, which currently includes Model S, Model X and Model 3.

We currently generate a significant percentage of our revenues from the sale of two products: Model S and Model X vehicles. Model 3, for whichsuch new technologies that we are planning significantly higher volumes than Model S or Model X, has required and will continue to require significant investment in connection with its ongoing ramp, and there is no guarantee that it will be commercially successful. Historically, automobile customers have come to expect a variety of vehicles offered in a manufacturer’s fleet and new and improved vehicle models to be introduced frequently.pioneering. In order to meet these expectations, we may inaddition, the future be required to introduce on a regular basis new vehicle models as well as enhanced versions of existing vehicle models. To the extent our product variety and cycles do not meet consumer expectations, or cannot be produced on our projected timelines and cost and volume targets, our future sales may be adversely affected. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

Our vehicles and energy storage products make use of lithium-ion battery cells, which have been observed to catch fire or vent smoke and flame, and such events have raised concerns, and future events may lead to additional concerns, about the batteries used in automotive applications.

The battery packs that we produce make use of lithium-ion cells. On rare occasions, lithium-ion cells can rapidly release the energy they contain by venting smoke and flames in a manner that can ignite nearby materials as well as other lithium-ion cells. While we have designed theour battery packpacks to passively contain any single cell’s release of energy without spreading to neighboring cells, there can be no assurance that a field or testing failure of our vehicles or other battery packs that we produce will not occur, which could subject us to lawsuits, product recalls, or redesign efforts, all of which would be time consuming and expensive. Also, negative public perceptions regarding the suitability of lithium-ion cells for automotive applications or any future incident involving lithium-ion


cells such as a vehicle or other fire, even if such incident does not involve our vehicles or energy storage products, could seriously harm our business.

In addition, we store a significant number of lithium-ion cells at our facilities and plan to produce high volumes of cells and battery modules and packs at Gigafactory 1. Any mishandling of battery cells may cause disruption to the operation of our facilities. While we have implemented safety procedures related to the handling of the cells, there can be no assurance that a safety issue or fire related to the cells would not disrupt our operations. Such damage or injury could lead to adverse publicity and potentially a safety recall. Moreover, any failure of a competitor’s electric vehicle or energy storage product may cause indirect adverse publicity for us and our products. Such adverse publicity could negatively affect our brand and harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

Increases in costs, disruption of supply or shortage of materials, in particular for lithium-ion cells, could harm our business.

We may experience increases in the cost or a sustained interruption in the supply or shortage of materials. Any such increase, supply interruption or shortage could materially and negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. We use various materials in our business including aluminum, steel, lithium, nickel, copper and cobalt, as well as lithium-ion cells from suppliers. The prices for these materials fluctuate, and their available supply may be unstable, depending on market conditions and global demand for these materials, including as a result of increased production of electric vehicles and energy storage products by our competitors, and could adversely affect our business and operating results. For instance, we are exposed to multiple risks relating to lithium-ion cells. These risks include:

an increase in the cost, or decrease in the available supply, of materials used in the cells;

disruption in the supply of cells due to quality issues or recalls by battery cell manufacturers or any issues that may arise with respect to cells manufactured at our own facilities; and

fluctuations in the value of the Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar as our battery cell purchases for Model S and Model X and some raw materials for cells used in Model 3 and energy storage products are currently denominated in Japanese yen. 

Our business is dependent on the continued supply of battery cells for the battery packs used in our vehicles and energy storage products. While we believe several sources of the battery cells are available for such battery packs, and expect to eventually rely substantially on battery cells manufactured at our own facilities, we have to date fully qualified only a very limited number of suppliers for the cells used in such battery packs and have very limited flexibility in changing cell suppliers. In particular, we have fully qualified only one supplier for the cells used in battery packs for our current production vehicles. Any disruption in the supply of battery cells from such suppliers could disrupt production of our vehicles and of the battery packs we produce for energy products until such time as a different supplier is fully qualified. Furthermore, fluctuations or shortages in petroleum and other economic conditions may cause us to experience significant increases in freight charges and material costs. Substantial increases in the prices for our materials or prices charged to us, such as those charged by battery cell suppliers, would increase our operating costs, and could reduce our margins if we cannot recoup the increased costs through increased vehicle prices. Any attempts to increase vehicle prices in response to increased material costs could result in cancellations of vehicle orders and reservations and therefore materially and adversely affect our brand, image, business, prospects and operating results.

We may become subject to product liability claims, which could harm our financial condition and liquidity if we are not able to successfully defend or insure against such claims.

Although we design our vehicles to be the safest vehicles on the road, product liability claims could harm our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. The automobile industry in particular experiences significant product liability claims and we face inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event our vehicles do not perform as expected. As is true for other automakers, our cars have been involved and we expect in the future will be involved in crashes resulting in death or personal injury, and such crashes where autopilot is engaged are the subject of significant public attention. We have experienced and we expect to continue to face claims related to misuse or failures of new technologies that we are pioneering, including autopilot in our vehicles. Moreover,high-speed crash. Likewise, as our solar energy systems and energy storage products generate and store electricity, they have the potential to fail or cause


injury to people or property. A successfulAny product liability claim againstmay subject us couldto lawsuits and substantial monetary damages, product recalls or redesign efforts, and even a meritless claim may require us to pay a substantial monetary award. Our risks in this area are particularly pronounced given the relatively limited numberdefend it, all of vehicles and energy storage products delivered to date and limited field experience of our products. Moreover, a product liability claim couldwhich may generate substantial negative publicity about our products and businessbe expensive and could have material adverse effect on our brand, business, prospects and operating results.time-consuming. In most jurisdictions, we generally self-insure against the risk of product liability claims for vehicle exposure, meaning that any product liability claims will likely have to be paid from company funds and not by insurance.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive,We will need to maintain public credibility and we may not be successful in competing in these industries. We currently face competition from new and established domestic and international competitors and expect to face competition from others in the future, including competition from companies with new technology.

The worldwide automotive market, particularly for alternative fuel vehicles, is highly competitive today and we expect it will become even more so in the future. There is no assurance that our vehicles will be successful in the respective markets in which they compete. Many established and new automobile manufacturers such as Audi, BMW, Daimler, General Motors, Toyota and Volvo, as well as other companies, have entered or are reported to have plans to enter the alternative fuel vehicle market, including hybrid, plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles, as well as the market for self-driving technology and applications. In some cases, such competitors have announced an intention to produce electric vehicles exclusively at some point in the future. Most of our current and potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, vehicle sales networks and other resources than we do and may be able to devote greater resources to the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion, sale and support of their products. Increased competition could result in lower vehicle unit sales, price reductions, revenue shortfalls, loss of customers and loss of market share, which could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. In addition, our Model 3 vehicle faces competition from existing and future automobile manufacturers in the extremely competitive entry-level premium sedan market, including Audi, BMW, Lexus and Mercedes.

The solar and energy storage industries are highly competitive. We face competition from other manufacturers, developers and installers of solar and energy storage systems, as well as from large utilities. Decreases in the retail prices of electricity from utilities or other renewable energy sources could make our products less attractive to customers and lead to an increased rate of customer defaults under our existing long-term leases and PPAs. Moreover, solar panel and lithium-ion battery prices have declined and are continuing to decline. As we increase our battery and solar manufacturing capabilities, including at Gigafactory 1 and Gigafactory 2, future price declines may harm our ability to produce energy storage systems and solar systems at competitive prices.

If we are unable to establish and maintain confidence in our long-term business prospects among consumers, analysts and within our industries, then our financial condition, operating results, business prospects and stock price may suffer materially.

Consumers may be less likely to purchase our products now if they are not convinced that our business will succeed or that our service and support and other operations will continue in the long term. Similarly, suppliers and other third parties will be less likely to invest time and resources in developing business relationships with us if they are not convinced that our business will succeed. Accordingly, in order to buildsucceed.

In order to maintain and maintaingrow our business, we must maintain credibility and confidence among customers, suppliers, analysts, investors, ratings agencies and other parties in our long-term financial viability and business prospects. Maintaining such confidence may be particularly complicated by certain factors, such aschallenging due to our limited operating history relative to established competitors; customer unfamiliarity with our products,products; any delays we may experience in scaling manufacturing, delivery and service operations to meet demand; competition and uncertainty regarding the future of electric vehicles or our other products and services andservices; our quarterly production and sales performance compared with market expectations. Manyexpectations; and other factors including those over which we have no control. In particular, Tesla’s products, business, results of these factorsoperations, statements and actions are largely outside our control, and any negative perceptions about our long-term business prospects, even ifwell-publicized by a range of third parties. Such attention includes frequent criticism, which is often exaggerated or unfounded, would likelysuch as speculation regarding the sufficiency or stability of our management team. Any such negative perceptions, whether caused by us or not, may harm our business and make it more difficult to raise additional funds if needed.


Our plan to generate ongoing growth and demand, including by expanding our network of Tesla stores, galleries, delivery centers, service centers and Superchargers, will require significant cash investments and management resources and may not meet expectations with respect to additional sales or installations of our products or availability of Superchargers.

We plan to generate ongoing growth and demand, including by globally expanding our network of Tesla stores, galleries, delivery centers, service centers, mobile service offerings and Superchargers. These plans will require significant cash investments and management resources and may not meet our expectations with respect to additional sales or installations of our products. This ongoing global expansion, which includes planned entry into markets in which we have limited or no experience selling, delivering, installing and/or servicing our products, and which may pose legal, regulatory, labor, cultural and political challenges that we have not previously encountered, may not have the desired effect of increasing sales and installations and expanding our brand presence to the degree we are anticipating. Furthermore, the increasing number of Model S and Model X vehicles, as well as the significant increase in our vehicle fleet size that we expect from Model 3, will require us to continue to increase the number of our Supercharger stations and connectors significantly. If we fail to do so, our customers could become dissatisfied, which could adversely affect sales of our vehicles. We will also need to ensure we are in compliance with any regulatory requirements applicable to the sale, installation and service of our products, the sale of electricity generated through our solar energy systems, and operation of Superchargers in those jurisdictions, which could take considerable time and expense. If we experience any delays or cannot meet customer expectations in expanding our customer infrastructure network, or our expansion plans are not successful in continuing to grow demand, this could lead to a decrease or stagnation in sales or installations of our products and could negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

We face risks associated with our international operations and expansion, including unfavorable regulatory, political, tax and labor conditions, and with establishing ourselves in new markets, all of which could harm our business.

We currently have international operations and subsidiaries in various countries and jurisdictions that are subject to legal, political, and regulatory requirements and social and economic conditions that may be very different from those affecting us domestically. Additionally, as part of our growth strategy, we will continue to expand our sales, delivery, service and Supercharger locations internationally. International expansion requires us to make significant expenditures, including the establishment of local operating entities, hiring of local employees and establishing facilities in advance of generating any revenue.

We are subject to a number of risks associated with international business activities that may increase our costs, impact our ability to sell our products and require significant management attention. These risks include conforming our products to various international regulatory and safety requirements as well as charging and other electric infrastructures, difficulty in establishing, staffing and managing foreign operations, challenges in attracting customers, foreign government taxes, regulations and permit requirements, our ability to enforce our contractual rights; trade restrictions, customs regulations, tariffs and price or exchange controls, and preferences of foreign nations for domestically manufactured products.

If we failunable to effectively grow, andor manage the compliance, residual value, financing and credit risks related to, our vehiclevarious financing programs,programs.

We offer financing arrangements for our business may suffer.

vehicles in North America, Europe and Asia primarily through various financial institutions. We also currently offer vehicle financing arrangements for Model S and Model Xdirectly through our local subsidiaries in certain markets. Depending on the U.S., Canada, Germanycountry, such arrangements are available for specified models and the UK, including leasingmay include operating leases directly through certain of those subsidiaries. The profitabilitywith us under which we typically receive only a very small portion of the leasing program depends ontotal vehicle purchase price at the time of lease, followed by a stream of payments over the term of the lease. We have also offered various arrangements for customers of our abilitysolar energy systems whereby they pay us a fixed payment to accurately project residual values, secure adequate financing and/lease or business partners to fund and grow this program, and screen for and manage customer credit risk. We expectfinance the need for leasing and other financing options will continue to be important to Model S and Model X deliveries and for Model 3 in the long term.purchase of such systems or purchase electricity generated by them. If we are unable to adequately fund our leasing program with internal funds, or partners or other external financing sources, and compelling alternative financing programs are not available for our customers, we may be unable to grow our sales. Furthermore, if our leasing business grows substantially, our business may suffer if we cannot effectively manage the greater levels of residual and credit risks resulting from growth. Finally, if we do not successfully monitor and comply with applicable national, state and/or local financial regulations and consumer protection laws governing leasethese transactions, we may become subject to enforcement actions or penalties, eitherpenalties.

The profitability of which may harm our business.


The unavailability, reduction or eliminationany directly-leased vehicles returned to us at the end of or unfavorable determinations with respect to, government and economic incentives in the U.S. and abroad supporting the development and adoption of electric vehicles or solar energy could have some impacttheir leases depends on demand for our products and services.

We currently benefit from certain government and economic incentives supporting the development and adoption of electric vehicles. In the U.S. and abroad, such incentives include, among other things, tax credits or rebates that encourage the purchase of electric vehicles. In Norway, for example, the purchase of electric vehicles is not currently subject to import taxes, taxes on non-recurring vehicle fees, the 25% value added tax or the purchase taxes that apply to the purchase of gas-powered vehicles. Notably, the quantum of incentive programs promoting electric vehicles is a tiny fraction of the amount of subsidies that are provided to gas-powered vehicles through the oil and gas industries. Nevertheless, even the limited benefits from such programs could be reduced, eliminated or exhausted. For example, in April 2017 and January 2016, respectively, previously available incentives in Hong Kong and Denmark that favored the purchase of electric vehicles expired, negatively impacting sales. Moreover, under current regulations, a $7,500 federal tax credit available in the U.S. for the purchase of qualified electric vehicles with at least 17 kWh of battery capacity, such as our vehicles, will begin to phase out over time with respect to any vehicles delivered in the second calendar quarter following the quarter in which we deliver our 200,000th qualifying vehicle in the U.S. We currently expect such 200,000th qualifying delivery to occur at some point during 2018. In addition, California implemented regulations phasing out a $2,500 cash rebate on qualified electric vehicles for high-income consumers, which became effective in March 2016. In certain circumstances, there is pressure from the oil and gas lobby or related special interests to bring about such developments, which could have some negative impact on demand for our vehicles.

In addition, certain governmental rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives that are currently available with respect to our solar and energy storage product businesses allow us to lower our installation costs and cost of capital and encourage customers to buy our products and investors to invest in our solar financing funds. However, these incentives may expire on a particular date, end when the allocated funding is exhausted or be reduced or terminated as renewable energy adoption rates increase, often without warning. For example, the federal government currently offers a 30% investment tax credit (“ITC”) for the installation of solar power facilities and energy storage systems that are charged from a co-sited solar power facility. The ITC is currently scheduled to decline to 10%, and expire altogether for residential systems, by January 2022. Likewise, in jurisdictions where net energy metering is currently available, our customers receive bill credits from utilities for energy that their solar energy systems generate and export to the grid in excess of the electric load they use. Several jurisdictions have reduced or eliminated the benefit available under net energy metering, or have proposed to do so. Such reductions in or termination of governmental incentives could adversely impact our results by making our products less competitive for potential customers, increasing our cost of capital and adversely impacting our ability to attract investmentaccurately project our vehicles’ residual values at the outset of the leases, and such values may fluctuate prior to the end of their terms depending on various factors such as supply and demand of our used vehicles, economic cycles and the pricing of new vehicles. We have made in the past and may make in the future certain adjustments to our prices from time to time in the ordinary course of business, which may impact the residual values of our vehicles and reduce the profitability of our vehicle leasing program. The funding and growth of this program also relies on our ability to secure adequate financing and/or business partners. If we are unable to adequately fund our leasing program through internal funds, partners or other financing sources, and to form newcompelling alternative financing fundsprograms are not available for our customers who may expect or need such options, we may be unable to grow our vehicle deliveries. Furthermore, if our vehicle leasing business grows substantially, our business may suffer if we cannot effectively manage the resulting greater levels of residual risk.

Similarly, we have provided resale value guarantees to vehicle customers and partners for certain financing programs, under which such counterparties may sell their vehicles back to us at certain points in time at pre-determined amounts. However, actual resale values are subject to fluctuations over the term of the financing arrangements, such as from the vehicle pricing changes discussed above. If the actual resale values of any vehicles resold or returned to us pursuant to these programs are materially lower than the pre-determined amounts we have offered, our financial condition and operating results may be harmed.

Finally, our vehicle and solar energy system financing programs and our energy storage assets. Additionally,sales programs also expose us to customer credit risk. In the enactmentevent of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the U.S. could potentially increase the cost, and decrease the availability, of renewable energy financing, by reducing the value of depreciation benefits associated with, and the overall investor tax capacity neededa widespread economic downturn or other catastrophic event, our customers may be unable or unwilling to monetize, renewable energy projects. Such changes could lower the overall investment willingness and capacity for such projects available in the market.

Moreover, we and our fund investors claim the ITC in amounts basedsatisfy their payment obligations to us on the fair market valuea timely basis or at all. If a significant number of our solar and energy storage systems. Althoughcustomers default, we obtain independent appraisals to support the claimed fair market values, the relevant governmental authorities have audited such values and in certain cases have determined that they should be lower, and they may do so in the future. Such determinations may result in adverse tax consequencesincur substantial credit losses and/or our obligation to make indemnification or other payments, or contribute additional assets, to our funds or fund investors.

Any failure by us to realize the expected benefits of our substantial investments and commitmentsimpairment charges with respect to the manufacture of PV cells and modules, including if we are unable to comply with the terms ofunderlying assets.

We must manage ongoing obligations under our agreement with the Research Foundation for the State University of New York relating to our Gigafactory 2, could result in negative consequences for our business.New York.

We own certain PV cell and module manufacturing and technology assets,are party to an operating lease and a build-to-suit lease arrangement with the Research Foundation for the State University of New York (the “SUNY Foundation”). Thisresearch and development agreement withthrough the SUNY Foundation providesFoundation. These agreements provide for the construction and use of our Gigafactory 2 in Buffalo, New York, which at full capacity we expect will be capablehave primarily used for the development and production of producing at least 1.0 gigawatt of PV cells and modules annually, including for our Solar Roof.Roof and other solar products and components, energy storage components and Supercharger components, and for other lessor-approved functions. Under this agreement, we are obligated to, among other things, employmeet employment targets as well as specified


minimum numbers of personnel in the State of New York and in Buffalo, New York and spend or incur $5.0$5.00 billion in combined capital, operational expenses, costs of goods sold and other costs in the State of New York during the 10-year period followingbeginning April 30, 2018. As we temporarily suspended most of our manufacturing operations at Gigafactory New York pursuant to a New York State executive order issued in March 2020 as a result of the completionCOVID-19 pandemic, we were granted a one-year deferral of all constructionour obligation to be compliant with our applicable targets under such agreement on April 30, 2020, which was memorialized in an amendment to our agreement with the SUNY Foundation in July 2020. While we expect to have and related infrastructure, the arrival of manufacturing equipment,grow significant operations at Gigafactory New York and the receipt of certain permits and other specified items at Gigafactory 2. If we failsurrounding Buffalo area, any failure by us in any year over the course of the term of the agreement to meet theseall applicable future obligations we would be obligatedmay result in our obligation to pay a “program payment” of $41.2$41 million to the SUNY Foundation infor such year. Any inability on our part to comply with the requirements of this agreement may result in the payment of significant amounts to the SUNY Foundation,year, the termination of our lease at Gigafactory 2,New York which may require us to pay additional penalties and/or the need to secure an alternative supplyadjust certain of PV cells and modules for products such as our operations, in particular our production ramp of the Solar Roof. Moreover, if we are unable to utilize our manufacturing and technology assets in accordance with our expectations, we may have to recognize accounting charges pertaining to the write-off of such assets.Roof or other components. Any of the foregoing events could have a material adverse effect onmay harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

If we are unable to attract, and/orhire and retain key employees and hire qualified personnel, our ability to compete couldmay be harmed.

The loss of the services of any of our key employees or any significant portion of our workforce could disrupt our operations or delay the development, introduction and introductionramp of our vehiclesproducts and services, and negatively impact our business, prospects and operating results.services. In particular, we are highly dependent on the services of Elon Musk, our Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey B. Straubel, our Chief Technical Officer.

None of our key employees is bound by an employment agreement for any specific term and we may not be able to successfully attract and retain senior leadership necessary to grow our business. Our future success also depends upon our ability to attract, hire and retain executive officersa large number of engineering, manufacturing, marketing, sales and other keydelivery, service, installation, technology sales, marketing, engineering, manufacturing and support personnel, especially to support our planned high-volume product sales, market and any failure to do so could adversely impactgeographical


expansion and technological innovations. Recruiting efforts, particularly for senior employees, may be time-consuming, which may delay the execution of our plans. If we are not successful in managing these risks, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.results may be harmed.

Key talentEmployees may leave Tesla or choose other employers over Tesla due to various factors, such as a very competitive labor market for talented individuals with automotive or technology experience.experience, or any negative publicity related to us. In California, Nevada and other regions where we have operations, there is increasing competition for individuals with skillsets needed for our business, including specialized knowledge of electric vehicles, software engineering, manufacturing engineering and other skills such as electrical and building construction expertise. This competition affects bothMoreover, we may be impacted by perceptions relating to reductions in force that we have conducted in the past in order to optimize our ability to retain keyorganizational structure and reduce costs and the departure of certain senior personnel for various reasons. Likewise, as a result of our temporary suspension of various U.S. manufacturing operations in the first half of 2020, in April 2020 we temporarily furloughed certain hourly employees and hire new ones. Our continued success depends upon our continued ability to hire new employees in a timely manner, especially to support our expansion plans and ramp to high-volume manufacture of vehicles, and retain current employees. Additionally, wereduced most salaried employees’ base salaries. We also compete with both mature and prosperous companies that have far greater financial resources than we do and start-ups and emerging companies that promise short-term growth opportunities. Difficulties

Finally, our compensation philosophy for all of our personnel reflects our startup origins, with an emphasis on equity-based awards and benefits in retaining currentorder to closely align their incentives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We periodically seek and obtain approval from our stockholders for future increases to the number of awards available under our equity incentive and employee stock purchase plans. If we are unable to obtain the requisite stockholder approvals for such future increases, we may have to expend additional cash to compensate our employees or recruiting new ones could have an adverse effect onand our performance.ability to retain and hire qualified personnel may be harmed.

We are highly dependent on the services of Elon Musk, our Chief Executive Officer.

We are highly dependent on the services of Elon Musk, our Chief Executive Officer Chairman of our Board of Directors and largest stockholder. Although Mr. Musk spends significant time with Tesla and is highly active in our management, he does not devote his full time and attention to Tesla. Mr. Musk also currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technical Officer of Space Exploration Technologies Corp., a developer and manufacturer of space launch vehicles, and is involved in other emerging technology ventures.

On February 8, 2018, we filed a proxy statement withWe must manage risks relating to our information technology systems and the threat of intellectual property theft, data breaches and cyber-attacks.

We must continue to expand and improve our information technology systems as our operations grow, such as product data management, procurement, inventory management, production planning and execution, sales, service and logistics, dealer management, financial, tax and regulatory compliance systems. This includes the implementation of new internally developed systems and the deployment of such systems in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuantabroad. We must also continue to which wemaintain information technology measures designed to protect us against intellectual property theft, data breaches, sabotage and other external or internal cyber-attacks or misappropriation. However, the implementation, maintenance, segregation and improvement of these systems require significant management time, support and cost, and there are seeking stockholder approvalinherent risks associated with developing, improving and expanding our core systems as well as implementing new systems and updating current systems, including disruptions to the related areas of the grant in January 2018 of a 10-year performance-based stock option award for Mr. Musk, which will be forfeited if not so approved (the “CEO Performance Award”). Mr. Musk currently has no other compensation at Tesla, other than a prior performance-based stock option award grantedbusiness operation. These risks may affect our ability to Mr. Musk in 2012, which has vested as to 9 out of 10 tranches,manage our data and a state-mandated minimum wage salary that he has never accepted. There is no assurance that the CEO Performance Award will receive stockholder approval.

We are subject to various environmentalinventory, procure parts or supplies or manufacture, sell, deliver and safetyservice products, adequately protect our intellectual property or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, tax laws and regulations thatother applicable regulations.

Moreover, if we do not successfully implement, maintain or expand these systems as planned, our operations may be disrupted, our ability to accurately and/or timely report our financial results could impose substantial costs upon usbe impaired and negativelydeficiencies may arise in our internal control over financial reporting, which may impact our ability to certify our financial results. Moreover, our proprietary information or intellectual property could be compromised or misappropriated and our reputation may be adversely affected. If these systems or their functionality do not operate as we expect them to, we may be required to expend significant resources to make corrections or find alternative sources for performing these functions.

Any unauthorized control or manipulation of our manufacturing facilities.products’ systems could result in loss of confidence in us and our products.

As a manufacturing company, includingOur products contain complex information technology systems. For example, our vehicles and energy storage products are designed with respectbuilt-in data connectivity to facilitiesaccept and install periodic remote updates from us to improve or update their functionality. While we have implemented security measures intended to prevent unauthorized access to our information technology networks, our products and their systems, malicious entities have reportedly attempted, and may attempt in the future, to gain unauthorized access to modify, alter and use such asnetworks, products and systems to gain control of, or to change, our products’ functionality, user interface and performance characteristics or to gain access to data stored in or generated by our products. We encourage reporting of potential vulnerabilities in the Tesla Factory, Gigafactory 1security of our products through our security vulnerability reporting policy, and Gigafactory 2, we aim to remedy any reported and verified vulnerability. However, there can be no assurance that any vulnerabilities will not be exploited before they can be identified, or that our remediation efforts are subject to complex environmental, health and safety laws and regulations at numerous

or will be successful.


jurisdictional levelsAny unauthorized access to or control of our products or their systems or any loss of data could result in legal claims or government investigations. In addition, regardless of their veracity, reports of unauthorized access to our products, their systems or data, as well as other factors that may result in the U.S. and abroad, including laws relating to the use, handling, storage, disposal and human exposure to hazardous materials. The costsperception that our products, their systems or data are capable of compliance, including remediating contamination if any is found onbeing hacked, may harm our properties and any changes to our operations mandated by new or amended laws, may be significant. We may also face unexpected delays in obtaining permits and approvals required by such laws in connection with our manufacturing facilities, which would hinder our operation of these facilities. Such costs and delays may adversely impact our businessbrand, prospects and operating results. Furthermore, any violationsWe have been the subject of these laws may resultsuch reports in substantial fines and penalties, remediation costs, third party damages, or a suspension or cessation of our operations.the past.

Our business may be adversely affected by any disruptions caused by union activities.

It is commonnot uncommon for employees of certain trades at companies with significant manufacturing operations such as us to belong to a union, which can result in higher employee costs and increased risk of work stoppages. Moreover, regulations in some jurisdictions outside of the U.S. mandate employee participation in industrial collective bargaining agreements and work councils with certain consultation rights with respect to the relevant companies’ operations. Although we work diligently to provide the best possible work environment for our employees, they may still decide to join or seek recognition to form a labor union, or we may be required to become a union signatory. The United Automobile Workers has publicly announced a desireFrom time to time, labor unions have engaged in campaigns to organize certain of our operations, as part of which such unions have filed unfair labor practice charges against us with the National Labor Relations Board, and they may do so in the future. In September 2019, an administrative law judge issued a recommended decision for Tesla Factory,on certain issues and against us on certain others. The National Labor Relations Board has been engaged innot yet adopted the recommendation and we have appealed certain aspects of the recommended decision. Any unfavorable ultimate outcome for Tesla may have a campaign againstnegative impact on the company.perception of Tesla’s treatment of our employees. Furthermore, we are directly or indirectly dependent upon companies with unionized work forces, such as parts suppliers and trucking and freight companies, andcompanies. Any work stoppages or strikes organized by such unions could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or operating results. If a work stoppage occurs, it could delay the manufacture and sale of our products and have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, operating results or financial condition.

Our products and services are subject to substantial regulations, which are evolving, and unfavorable changes or failure by us to comply with these regulations could substantiallymay harm our business and operating results.

Motor vehicles are subject to substantial regulation under international, federal, state, and local laws. We incur significant costs in complying with these regulations and may be required to incur additional costs to comply with any changes to such regulations, and any failures to comply could result in significant expenses, delays or fines. We are subject to laws and regulations applicable to the manufacture, import, sale and service of automobiles internationally. For example, in countries outside of the U.S., we are required to meet standards relating to vehicle safety, fuel economy and emissions, among other things, that are often materially different from requirements in the U.S., thus resulting in additional investment into the vehicles and systems to ensure regulatory compliance in those countries. This process may include official review and certification of our vehicles by foreign regulatory agencies prior to market entry, as well as compliance with foreign reporting and recall management systems requirements.

Additionally, our vehicles are equipped with a suite of driver-assistance features called autopilot, which help assist drivers with certain tedious and potentially dangerous aspects of road travel, but require drivers to remain engaged. There is a variety of international, federal, and state regulations that may apply to self-driving vehicles, which include many existing vehicle standards that were not originally intended to apply to vehicles that may not have a driver. Such regulations continue to rapidly change, which increases the likelihood of a patchwork of complex or conflicting regulations, or may delay products or restrict self-driving features and availability, any of which could adversely affect our business.

Moreover, as a manufacturer and installer of solar generation and energy storage systems and a supplier of electricity generated and stored by the solar energy and energy storage systems we install for customers, we are impacted by federal, state and local regulations and policies concerning electricity pricing, the interconnection of electricity generation and storage equipment with the electric grid, and the sale of electricity generated by third-party owned systems. For example, existing or proposed regulations and policies would permit utilities to limit the amount of electricity generated by our customers with their solar energy systems, charge fees and penalties to our customers relating to the purchase of energy other than from the grid, adjust electricity rate designs such that the price of our solar products may not be competitive with that of electricity from the grid, restrict us and our customers from transacting under our PPAs or qualifying for government incentives and benefits that apply to solar power, and limit or eliminate net energy metering. If such regulations and policies remain in effect or are adopted in other jurisdictions, or if other regulations and policies that adversely impact the interconnection of our solar and energy storage systems to the grid are introduced, modified or eliminated, they could deter potential customers from


purchasing our solar and energy storage products, threaten the economics of our existing contracts and cause us to cease solar and energy storage system sales and operations in the relevant jurisdictions, which could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to various privacy and consumer protection laws.

Our privacy policy is posted on our website, and any failure by us or our vendor or other business partners to comply with it or with federal, state or international privacy, data protection or security laws or regulations could result in regulatory or litigation-related actions against us, legal liability, fines, damages and other costs. We may also incur substantial expenses and costs in connection with maintaining compliance with such laws. For example, commencing in May 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) will fully applychoose to the processing of personal information collected from individuals located in the European Union. The GDPR will create new compliance obligations and will significantly increase fines for noncompliance. Although we take steps to protect the security of our customers’ personal information, we may be required to expend significant resources to comply with data breach requirements if third parties improperly obtain and use the personal information of our customers or we otherwise experience a data loss with respect to customers’ personal information. A major breach of our network security and systems could have negative consequences for our business and future prospects, including possible fines, penalties and damages, reduced customer demand for our vehicles, and harm to our reputation and brand.

We may be compelled to undertake product recalls or take other actions, which could adversely affectsimilar actions.

As a manufacturing company, we must manage the risk of product recalls with respect to our brand image and financial performance.

Any product recall, includingproducts. Recalls for solar or charging equipment, in the future may result in adverse publicity, damage our brand and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. For example, certain limited vehicle recalls that we initiated in the past two yearsvehicles have resulted from, a component that could prevent the parking brake from releasing once engaged, a concern with the firmware in the restraints control module in certain right-hand-drive vehicles,for example, industry-wide issues with airbags from a particular supplier, a front seat belt issueconcerns of corrosion in a single field vehicle,Model S and Model X seat components that could cause unintended seat movement during a collision. Furthermore,power steering assist motor bolts, certain suspension failures in Model S and Model X and issues with Model S and Model X media control units. In addition to recalls initiated by us for various causes, testing of or investigations into our vehiclesproducts by government regulators or industry groups may requirecompel us to initiate vehicleproduct recalls or may result in negative public perceptions about the safety of our vehicles.products, even if we disagree with the defect determination or have data that shows the actual safety risk to be non-existent. In the future, we may at various times, voluntarily or involuntarily initiate a recallrecalls if any of our products are determined by us or our electric vehicle powertrain components that we have provideda regulator to other vehicle OEMs, including any systemscontain a safety defect or parts sourced from our suppliers, prove to be defective or noncompliant with applicable laws and regulations, such as U.S. federal motor vehicle safety standards. Such recalls, whether voluntary or involuntary or caused by systems or components engineered or manufactured by us or our suppliers, could involveresult in significant expense, supply chain complications and could adversely affectservice burdens, and may harm our brand, image in our target markets, as well as our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Our resale value guarantee and leasing programs for our vehicles expose us to the risk that the resale values of vehicles returned to us are lower than our estimates and may result in lower revenues, gross margin, profitability and liquidity.

We have provided resale value guarantees to many of our customers, under which such customers may sell their vehicles back to us at certain points in time at pre-determined resale values. If the resale values of any vehicles resold or returned to us pursuant to these programs are materially lower than our estimates, our profitability and/or liquidity could be negatively impacted.

We have applied lease accounting on leases made directly by us and, prior to 2018, on all leases made by our leasing partners and sales by us of vehicles with a resale value guarantee. Under lease accounting, we recognize the associated revenues and costs of the vehicle sale over time rather than fully upfront at vehicle delivery. As a result, these programs generate lower revenues in the period the car is delivered and higher gross margins during the period of the resale value guarantee as compared to purchases in which the resale value guarantee does not apply. A higher than anticipated prevalence of these programs could therefore have an adverse impact on our near term revenues and operating results. Moreover, unlike the sale of a vehicle with a resale value guarantee or programs with leasing partners which do not impact our cash flows and liquidity at the time of vehicle delivery, under a lease held directly by us, we may receive only a very small portion of the total vehicle purchase price at the time of lease, followed by a stream of payments over the term of the lease. To the extent we expand our leasing program without securing


external financing or business partners to support such expansion, our cash flow and liquidity could also be negatively impacted.

Our current and future warranty reserves may be insufficient to cover future warranty claims which could adversely affect our financial performance.claims.

Subject to separate limited warranties for the supplemental restraint system, batteryWe provide a manufacturer’s warranty on all new and drive unit, we provide four year or 50,000 mile limited warranties for the purchasers of new Model 3, Model S and Model X vehicles and either a four year or 50,000 mile limited warranty or a two year or 100,000 mile limited warranty for the purchasers of used Model S or Model X vehicles certified and sold by us. The limited warranty for the battery and drive unit for new Model S and Model X vehicles covers the drive unit for eight years, as well as the battery for a period of eight years (or for certain older vehicles, 125,000 miles if reached sooner than eight years), although the battery’s charging capacity is not covered under any of our warranties or Extended Service plans; the limited warranty for used Model S and Model X vehicles does not extend or otherwise alter the terms of the original battery and drive unit limited warranty for such used vehicles specified in their original New Vehicle Limited Warranty. For the battery and drive unit on our current new Model 3Tesla vehicles we offer an eight year or 100,000 mile limited warranty for our standard range battery and an eight year or 120,000 mile limited warranty for our long range battery,sell. We also provide certain warranties with minimum 70% retention of battery capacity over the warranty period. In addition, customers of new Model S and Model X vehicles have the opportunityrespect to purchase an Extended Service plan for the period after the end of the limited warranty for their new vehicles to cover additional services for up to an additional four years or 50,000 miles, provided it is purchased within a specified period of time.

For energy storage products, we provide limited warranties against defects and to guarantee minimum energy retention levels. For example, we guarantee that each Powerwall 2 product will maintain at least 70-80% of its stated energy capacity after 10 years, and that each Powerpack 2 product will retain specified minimum energy capacities in each of its first 10 to 15 years of use. For our Solar Roof, we offer a warranty on the glass tiles for the lifetime of a customer’s home and a separate warranty for the energy generation capability of the solar tiles. We also offer extended warranties, availability guarantees and capacity guaranteesstorage systems we sell, including on their installation and maintenance, and for periods of up to 20 years at an additional cost at the time of purchase, as well as workmanship warranties to customers who elect to havecomponents not manufactured by us, install their systems.

Finally, customers who buy energy from us under solar energy system leases or PPAs are covered by warranties equal to the length of the agreement term, which is typically 20 years. Systems purchased for cash are covered by a warranty of up to 10 years, with extended warranties available at additional cost. In addition, we generally pass through to our customers the inverterapplicable manufacturers’ warranties. As part of our energy generation and panel manufacturers’ warranties, which generally range from 5 to 25 years, subjecting us tostorage system contracts, we may provide the customer with performance guarantees that warrant that the underlying system will meet or exceed the minimum energy generation or other energy performance requirements specified in the contract. Under these performance guarantees, we bear the risk thatof electricity production or other performance shortfalls, even if they result from failures in components from third party manufacturers. These risks are exacerbated in the event such manufacturers may later cease operations or fail to honor their underlying warranties. Finally, we provide a performance guarantee with our leased solar energy systems that compensates a customer on an annual basis if their system does not meet the electricity production guarantees set forth in their lease.

If our warranty reserves are inadequate to cover future warranty claims on our products, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results couldmay be materially and adversely affected.harmed. Warranty reserves include our management’s best estimateestimates of the projected costs to repair or to replace items under warranty. These estimateswarranty, which are based on actual claims incurred to-dateto date and an estimate of the nature, frequency and costs of future claims. Such estimates are inherently uncertain and changes to our historical or projected experience, especially with respect to products such as Model 3, Model Y and Solar Roof that are newwe have recently introduced and/or that we expect to produce at significantly greater volumes than our past products, may cause material changes to our warranty reserves in the future.

We are continuously expanding and improving our information technology systems and use security measures designed to protect our systems against breaches and cyber-attacks. If these efforts are not successful, our business and operations could be disrupted and our operating results and reputation could be harmed.

We are continuously expanding and improving our information technology systems, including implementing new internally developed systems, to assist us in the management of our business. In particular, our volume production of multiple vehicles necessitates continued development, maintenance and improvement of our information technology systems in the U.S. and abroad, which include product data management, procurement, inventory management, production planning and execution, sales, service and logistics, dealer management,


financial, tax and regulatory compliance systems. The implementation, maintenance and improvement of these systems require significant management time, support and cost. Moreover, there are inherent risks associated with developing, improving and expanding our core systems as well as implementing new systems, including the disruption of our data management, procurement, manufacturing execution, finance, supply chain and sales and service processes. These risks may affect our ability to manage our data and inventory, procure parts or supplies or manufacture, sell, deliver and service vehicles, or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, tax laws and other applicable regulations. We also maintain information technology measures designed to protect us against system security risks, data breaches and cyber-attacks.

We cannot be sure that these systems or their required functionality will be effectively implemented, maintained or expanded as planned. If we do not successfully implement, maintain or expand these systems as planned, our operations may be disrupted, our ability to accurately and/or timely report our financial results could be impaired, and deficiencies may arise in our internal control over financial reporting, which may impact our ability to certify our financial results. Moreover, our proprietary information could be compromised and our reputation may be adversely affected. If these systems or their functionality do not operate as we expect them to, we may be required to expend significant resources to make corrections or find alternative sources for performing these functions.

Our insurance coverage strategy may not be adequate to protect us from all business risks.

We may be subject, in the ordinary course of business, to losses resulting from products liability, accidents, acts of God and other claims against us, for which we may have no insurance coverage. As a general matter, we do not maintain as much insurance coverage as many other companies do, and in some cases, we do not maintain any at all. Additionally, the policies that we do have may include significant deductibles or self-insured retentions, policy limitations and exclusions, and we cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be sufficient to cover all future losses or claims against us. A loss that is uninsured or which exceeds policy limits may require us to pay substantial amounts, which could adversely affectmay harm our financial condition and operating results.

Our financial results may vary significantly from period-to-period due to fluctuations in our operating costs.

We expect our period-to-period financial results to vary based on our operating costs which we anticipate will increase significantly in future periods as we, among other things, ramp up the production of Model 3, expand Gigafactory 1, open new Tesla stores and service centers with maintenance and repair capabilities, open new Supercharger locations, ramp production at Gigafactory 2, increase our sales and marketing activities, and increase our general and administrative functions to support our growing operations. Moreover, we expect to continue to design, develop and manufacture new and future products, and increase our production capacity by expanding our current manufacturing facilities and adding future facilities. As a result of these factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our financial results, especially in the short-term, are not necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of future performance. Moreover, our financial results may not meet expectations of equity research analysts or investors. If any of this occurs, the trading price of our stock could fall substantially, either suddenly or over time.

Any unauthorized control or manipulation of our vehicles’ systems could result in loss of confidence in us and our vehicles and harm our business.

Our vehicles contain complex information technology systems. For example, our vehicles are designed with built-in data connectivity to accept and install periodic remote updates from us to improve or update the functionality of our vehicles. We have designed, implemented and tested security measures intended to prevent unauthorized access to our information technology networks, our vehicles and their systems. However, hackers have reportedly attempted, and may attempt in the future, to gain unauthorized access to modify, alter and use such networks, vehicles and systems to gain control of, or to change, our vehicles’ functionality, user interface and performance characteristics, or to gain access to data stored in or generated by the vehicle. We encourage reporting of potential vulnerabilities in the security of our vehicles via our security vulnerability reporting policy, and we aim to remedy any reported and verified vulnerabilities. Accordingly, we have received reports of potential vulnerabilities in the past and have attempted to remedy them. However, there can be no assurance that vulnerabilities will not be identified in the future, or that our remediation efforts are or will be successful.


Any unauthorized access to or control of our vehicles or their systems or any loss of data could result in legal claims or proceedings. In addition, regardless of their veracity, reports of unauthorized access to our vehicles, their systems or data, as well as other factors that may result in the perception that our vehicles, their systems or data are capable of being “hacked,” could negatively affect our brand and harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. We have been the subject of such reports in the past.

Servicing our indebtedness requires a significant amount of cash, and thereThere is no guarantee that we will have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial indebtedness or that we will not incur additional indebtedness.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we and our subsidiaries had outstanding $10.17$10.57 billion in aggregate principal amount of indebtedness (see Note 13, Convertible and Long-Term 12, Debt Obligations,, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Our substantial consolidated indebtedness may increase our vulnerability to any generally adverse economic and industry conditions. We and our subsidiaries may, subject to the limitations in the terms of our existing and future indebtedness, incur additional debt, secure existing or future debt or recapitalize our debt.

Pursuant to their terms, holdersHolders of convertible senior notes issued by us or our 1.50% Convertible Senior notes due 2018, 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019, 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2021 and 2.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2022 (collectively, the “Tesla Convertible Notes”)subsidiary may convert their respective Tesla Convertible Notessuch notes at their option prior to the scheduled maturities of the respective Tesla Convertible Notesconvertible senior notes under certain circumstances.circumstances pursuant to the terms of such notes. Upon conversion of the applicable Tesla Convertible Notes,convertible senior notes, we will be obligated to deliver cash and/or shares in respect ofpursuant to the principal amounts thereof and the conversion value in excessterms of such principal amounts on such Tesla Convertible Notes.notes. For example, in June 2017, September 2017 and November 2017, pursuant to separate privately negotiated agreements,as our stock price has significantly increased recently, we exchanged $144.8 million, $10.0 million and $12.0 million, respectively, in aggregate principal amounthave seen higher levels of the 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 for 1.2 million shares, 0.1 million shares and 0.1 million shares, respectively,early conversions of our common stock.such “in-the-money” convertible senior notes. Moreover, our subsidiary’s 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018, 1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 and Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (collectively, the “Subsidiary Convertible Notes”) are convertible into shares of our common stock at conversion prices ranging from $300.00 to $759.36 per share. Finally, holders of the Tesla Convertible Notes and the Subsidiary Convertible Notes willsuch convertible senior notes may have the right to require us to repurchase their notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change at a purchase price equalpursuant to 100%the terms of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the fundamental change purchase date.such notes.

Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal and interest on our indebtedness when due, or to make payments upon conversion or repurchase demands with respect to our convertible senior notes or to refinance our indebtedness as we may need or desire, depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not continue to generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to satisfy our obligations under our existing indebtedness and any future indebtedness we may incur, and to make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, refinancing or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance existing or future indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. In addition, our ability to make payments may be limited by law, by regulatory authority or by agreements governing our future indebtedness. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms or at all, which couldmay result in a default on our existing or future indebtedness and have a material adverse effect onharm our business, results of operationsfinancial condition and financial condition.operating results.

Our debt agreements contain covenant restrictions that may limit our ability to operate our business.

The terms of certain of our credit facilities, including our senior secured asset basedasset-based revolving credit agreement, contain, and any of our other future debt agreements may contain, covenant restrictions that limit our ability to operate our business, including restrictions on our ability to, among other things, incur additional debt or issue guarantees, create liens, repurchase stock, or make other restricted payments, and make certain voluntary prepayments of specified debt. In addition, under certain circumstances we are required to comply with a fixed charge coverage ratio. As a result of these covenants, our ability to respond to changes in business and economic conditions and engage in beneficial transactions, including to obtain additional financing as needed, may be restricted. Furthermore, our failure to comply with our debt covenants could result in a default under our debt


agreements, which could permit the holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the debt. If any of our debt is accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds available to repay it.

WeAdditional funds may need or want to raise additional funds and these funds maynot be available to us when we need them. If we cannot raise additional funds when we need or want them,them.

Our business and our operationsfuture plans for expansion are capital-intensive, and prospects could be negatively affected.

The design, manufacture, sale, installation and/or servicingthe specific timing of automobiles, energy storage productscash inflows and solar products is a capital intensive business. Until we are consistently generating positive free cash flows, weoutflows may fluctuate substantially from period to period. We may need or want to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-related or debt securities or through obtaining credit from financial institutions to fund, together with our principal sources of liquidity,, the costs of developing and manufacturing our current or future vehicles, energy storage products and/or solar products, to pay any significant unplanned or accelerated expenses or for new significant strategic investments, or to refinance our significant consolidated indebtedness, even if not required to do so by the terms of such indebtedness. We need sufficient capital to fund our ongoing operations, ramp vehicle production, continue research and development projects, establish sales, delivery and service centers, build and deploy Superchargers, expand Gigafactory 1, ramp production at Gigafactory 2 and to make the investments in tooling and manufacturing capital required to introduce new vehicles, energy storage products and solar products. We cannot be certain that additional funds will be available to us on favorable terms when required, or at all. If we cannot raise additional funds when we need them, our financial condition, results of operations, business and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Additionally, we use capital from third-party investors to enable our customers’ access to our solar energy systems with little or no upfront cost. The availability of this financing depends upon many factors, including the confidence of the investors in the solar energy industry, the quality and mix of our customer contracts, any regulatory changes impacting the economics of our existing customer contracts, changes in law (including tax law), risks or government incentives associated with these financings, and our ability to compete with other renewable energy companies for the limited number of potential investors. Moreover, interest rates are at historically low levels. If the rate of return required by investors rises as a result of a rise in interest rates, it will reduce the present value of the customer payment streams underlying, and therefore the total value of, our financing structures, increasing our cost of capital. If we are unable to establish new financing funds on favorable terms for third-party ownership arrangements, we may be unable to finance installation of our solar energy system lease or PPA customers’ systems, or our cost of capital could increase and our liquidityWe may be negatively impacted which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and resultsby any early obsolescence of operations.

If we update our manufacturing equipment more quickly than expected, we may have to shorten the useful lives of any equipment to be retired as a result of any such update, and the resulting acceleration in our depreciation could negatively affect our financial results.equipment.

We have invested and expect to continue to invest significantly in what we believe is state of the art tooling, machinery and other manufacturing equipment for our various product lines, and we depreciate the cost of suchour manufacturing equipment over their expected useful lives. However, product cycles or manufacturing technology may evolve rapidly,change periodically, and we may decide to update our products or manufacturing process with cutting-edge equipmentprocesses more quickly than expected. Moreover, as ourimprovements in engineering and manufacturing expertise and efficiency increase, we may be ableresult in our ability to manufacture our products using less of our currently installed equipment. Alternatively, as we ramp and mature the production of our products to higher levels, we may discontinue the use of already installed equipment in favor of different or additional equipment. The useful life of any equipment that would be retired early as a result would be shortened, causing the depreciation on such equipment to be accelerated, and our results of operations may be harmed.


We hold and may acquire digital assets that may be subject to volatile market prices, impairment and unique risks of loss.

In January 2021, we updated our investment policy to provide us with more flexibility to further diversify and maximize returns on our cash that is not required to maintain adequate operating liquidity. As part of the policy, which was duly approved by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, we may invest a portion of such cash in certain alternative reserve assets including digital assets, gold bullion, gold exchange-traded funds and other assets as specified in the future. Thereafter, we invested an aggregate $1.50 billion in bitcoin under this policy and may acquire and hold digital assets from time to time or long-term. Moreover, we expect to begin accepting bitcoin as a form of payment for our products in the near future, subject to applicable laws and initially on a limited basis, which we may or may not liquidate upon receipt.

The prices of digital assets have been in the past and may continue to be highly volatile, including as a result of various associated risks and uncertainties. For example, the prevalence of such assets is a relatively recent trend, and their long-term adoption by investors, consumers and businesses is unpredictable. Moreover, their lack of a physical form, their reliance on technology for their creation, existence and transactional validation and their decentralization may subject their integrity to the threat of malicious attacks and technological obsolescence. Finally, the extent to which securities laws or other regulations apply or may apply in the future to such assets is unclear and may change in the future. If we hold digital assets and their values decrease relative to our purchase prices, our financial condition may be harmed.

Moreover, digital assets are currently considered indefinite-lived intangible assets under applicable accounting rules, meaning that any decrease in their fair values below our carrying values for such assets at any time subsequent to their acquisition will require us to recognize impairment charges, whereas we may make no upward revisions for any market price increases until a sale, which may adversely affect our operating results in any period in which such impairment occurs. Moreover, there is no guarantee that future changes in GAAP will not require us to change the way we account for digital assets held by us.

Finally, as intangible assets without centralized issuers or governing bodies, digital assets have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks or other malicious activities, as well as human errors or computer malfunctions that may result in the loss or destruction of private keys needed to access such assets. While we intend to take all reasonable measures to secure any digital assets, if such threats are realized or the measures or controls we create or implement to secure our digital assets fail, it could result in a partial or total misappropriation or loss of our digital assets, and our financial condition and operating results may be negatively impacted.harmed.

We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could negatively affectrates.

We transact business globally in multiple currencies and have foreign currency risks related to our financial results.

Our revenuesrevenue, costs of revenue, operating expenses and costslocalized subsidiary debt denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, currently primarily the Chinese yuan, euro, Canadian dollar and British pound. To the extent we have significant revenues denominated in such foreign currencies, are not completely matched. As we have increased vehicle deliveries in markets outside of the U.S., we have much higher revenues than costs denominated in other currencies such as the euro, Chinese yuan, Norwegian krone, pound sterling and Canadian dollar. Anyany strengthening of the U.S. dollar would tend to reduce our revenues as measured in U.S. dollars, as we have historically experienced. In addition, a portion of our costs and expenses have been, and we anticipate will continue to be, denominated in foreign currencies, including the Chinese yuan and Japanese yen. If we do not have fully offsetting revenues in these currencies and if the value of the U.S. dollar depreciates significantly against these currencies, our costs as measured


in U.S. dollars as a percent of our revenues will correspondingly increase and our margins will suffer. Moreover, while we undertake limited hedging activities intended to offset the impact of currency translation exposure, it is impossible to predict or eliminate such impact. As a result, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We may face regulatory limitations on our ability to sell vehicles directly which could materially and adversely affect our ability to sell our electric vehicles.

We sell our vehicles directly to consumers. We may not be able to sell our vehicles through this sales model in each state in the U.S. as some states have laws that may be interpreted to impose limitations on this direct-to-consumer sales model. In certain states in which we are not able to obtain dealer licenses, we have opened galleries, which are not full retail locations.

The application of these state laws to our operations continues to be difficult to predict. Laws in some states have limited our ability to obtain dealer licenses from state motor vehicle regulators and may continue to do so.

In addition, decisions by regulators permitting us to sell vehicles may be challenged by dealer associations and others as to whether such decisions comply with applicable state motor vehicle industry laws. We have prevailed in many of these lawsuits and such results have reinforced our continuing belief that state laws were not designed to prevent our distribution model. In some states, there have also been regulatory and legislative efforts by dealer associations to propose laws that, if enacted, would prevent us from obtaining dealer licenses in their states given our current sales model. A few states have passed legislation that clarifies our ability to operate, but at the same time limits the number of dealer licenses we can obtain or stores that we can operate. We have also filed a lawsuit in federal court in Michigan challenging the constitutionality of the state’s prohibition on direct sales as applied to our business.

Internationally, there may be laws in jurisdictions we have not yet entered or laws we are unaware of in jurisdictions we have entered that may restrict our sales or other business practices. Even for those jurisdictions we have analyzed, the laws in this area can be complex, difficult to interpret and may change over time. Continued regulatory limitations and other obstacles interfering with our ability to sell vehicles directly to consumers could have a negative and material impact our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.harmed.

We may need to defend ourselves against intellectual property infringement claims, which may be time-consuming and could cause us to incur substantial costs.expensive.

Others, including ourOur competitors or other third parties may hold or obtain patents, copyrights, trademarks or other proprietary rights that could prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make, use, develop, sell or market our products and services, which could make it more difficult for us to operate our business. From time to time, the holders of such intellectual property rights may assert their rights and urge us to take licenses and/or may bring suits alleging infringement or misappropriation of such rights. Werights, which could result in substantial costs, negative publicity and management attention, regardless of merit. While we endeavor to obtain and protect the intellectual property rights that we expect will allow us to retain or advance our strategic initiatives, there can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately identify and protect the portions of intellectual property that are strategic to our business, or mitigate the risk of potential suits or other legal demands by our competitors. Accordingly, we may consider the entering into licensing agreements with respect to such rights, although no assurance can be given that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur, and such licenses and associated litigation could significantly increase our operating expenses. In addition, if we are determined to have or believe there is a high likelihood that we have infringed upon a third party’s intellectual property rights, we may be required to cease making, selling or incorporating certain components or intellectual property into the goods and services we offer, to pay substantial damages and/or license royalties, to redesign our products and services and/or to establish and maintain alternative


branding for our products and services. In the event that we wereare required to take one or more such actions, our brand, business, prospects,financial condition and operating results and financial condition couldmay be materially adversely affected. In addition, any litigation or claims, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs, negative publicity and diversion of resources and management attention.harmed.

Our facilities or operations could be damaged or adversely affected by events outside of our control, such as a resultnatural disasters, wars or health epidemics.

We may be impacted by natural disasters, wars, health epidemics or other events outside of disasters.

Ourour control. For example, our corporate headquarters, the TeslaFremont Factory and Gigafactory 1Nevada are located in seismically active regions in Northern California and Nevada.Nevada, and our Gigafactory Shanghai is located in a flood-prone area. If major disasters such as earthquakes, floods or other events occur, or our information system or communications network breaks down or operates improperly, our headquarters and production facilities may be seriously damaged, or we may have to stop or delay production and shipment of our products. In addition, the global COVID-19 pandemic has impacted economic markets, manufacturing operations, supply chains, employment and consumer behavior in nearly every geographic region and industry across the world, and we have been, and may in the future be, adversely affected as a result. We may incur expenses or delays relating to such damages,events outside of our control, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Risks Related to Government Laws and Regulations

Demand for our products and services may be impacted by the status of government and economic incentives supporting the development and adoption of such products.

Government and economic incentives that support the development and adoption of electric vehicles in the U.S. and abroad, including certain tax exemptions, tax credits and rebates, may be reduced, eliminated or exhausted from time to time. For example, a $7,500 federal tax credit that was available in the U.S. for the purchase of our vehicles was reduced in phases during and ultimately ended in 2019. We believe that this sequential phase-out likely pulled forward some vehicle demand into the periods preceding each reduction. Moreover, previously available incentives favoring electric vehicles in areas including Ontario, Canada, Germany, Hong Kong, Denmark and California have expired or were cancelled or temporarily unavailable, and in some cases were not eventually replaced or reinstituted, which may have negatively impacted sales. Any similar developments could have some negative impact on demand for our vehicles, and we and our customers may have to adjust to them.

In addition, certain governmental rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives that are currently available with respect to our solar and energy storage product businesses allow us to lower our costs and encourage customers to buy our products and investors to invest in our solar financing funds. However, these incentives may expire when the allocated funding is exhausted, reduced or terminated as renewable energy adoption rates increase, sometimes without warning. For example, the U.S. federal government currently offers certain tax credits for the installation of solar power facilities and energy storage systems that are charged from a co-sited solar power facility; however, these tax credits are currently scheduled to decline and/or expire in 2023 and beyond. Likewise, in jurisdictions where net metering is currently available, our customers receive bill credits from utilities for energy that their solar energy systems generate and export to the grid in excess of the electric load they use. The benefit available under net metering has been or has been proposed to be reduced, altered or eliminated in several jurisdictions, and has also been contested and may continue to be contested before the FERC. Any reductions or terminations of such incentives may harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results by making our products less competitive for potential customers, increasing our cost of capital and adversely impacting our ability to attract investment partners and to form new financing funds for our solar and energy storage assets.

Finally, we and our fund investors claim these U.S. federal tax credits and certain state incentives in amounts based on independently appraised fair market values of our solar and energy storage systems. Nevertheless, the relevant governmental authorities have audited such values and in certain cases have determined that these values should be lower, and they may do so again in the future. Such determinations may result in adverse tax consequences and/or our obligation to make indemnification or other payments to our funds or fund investors.

We are subject to evolving laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs, legal prohibitions or unfavorable changes upon our operations or products.

As we grow our manufacturing operations in additional regions, we are or will be subject to complex environmental, manufacturing, health and safety laws and regulations at numerous jurisdictional levels in the U.S., China, Germany and other locations abroad, including laws relating to the use, handling, storage, recycling, disposal and/or human exposure to hazardous materials, product material inputs and post-consumer products and with respect to constructing, expanding and maintaining our facilities. The costs of compliance, including remediations of any discovered issues and any changes to our operations mandated by new or amended laws, may be significant, and any failures to comply could result in significant expenses, delays or fines. We are also subject to laws and regulations applicable to the supply, manufacture, import, sale and service of automobiles both domestically and abroad. For example, in countries outside of the U.S., we are required to meet standards relating to vehicle safety, fuel economy and


emissions that are often materially different from requirements in the U.S., thus resulting in additional investment into the vehicles and systems to ensure regulatory compliance in those countries. This process may include official review and certification of our vehicles by foreign regulatory agencies prior to market entry, as well as compliance with foreign reporting and recall management systems requirements.

In particular, we offer in our vehicles Autopilot and FSD features that today assist drivers with certain tedious and potentially dangerous aspects of road travel, but which currently require drivers to remain fully engaged in the driving operation. We are continuing to develop our FSD technology with the goal of achieving full self-driving capability in the future. There are a variety of international, federal and state regulations that may apply to self-driving vehicles, which include many existing vehicle standards that were not originally intended to apply to vehicles that may not have a driver. Such regulations continue to rapidly change, which increases the likelihood of a patchwork of complex or conflicting regulations, or may delay products or restrict self-driving features and availability, which could adversely affect our business.

Finally, as a manufacturer, installer and service provider with respect to solar generation and energy storage systems and a supplier of electricity generated and stored by the solar energy and energy storage systems we install for customers, we are impacted by federal, state and local regulations and policies concerning electricity pricing, the interconnection of electricity generation and storage equipment with the electric grid and the sale of electricity generated by third party-owned systems. If regulations and policies that adversely impact the interconnection or use of our solar and energy storage systems are introduced, they could deter potential customers from purchasing our solar and energy storage products, threaten the economics of our existing contracts and cause us to cease solar and energy storage system sales and operations in the relevant jurisdictions, which may harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Any failure by us to comply with a variety of U.S. and international privacy and consumer protection laws may harm us.

Any failure by us or our vendor or other business partners to comply with our public privacy notice or with federal, state or international privacy, data protection or security laws or regulations relating to the processing, collection, use, retention, security and transfer of personally identifiable information could result in regulatory or litigation-related actions against us, legal liability, fines, damages, ongoing audit requirements and other significant costs. Substantial expenses and operational changes may be required in connection with maintaining compliance with such laws, and in particular certain emerging privacy laws are still subject to a high degree of uncertainty as to their interpretation and application. For example, in May 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation began to fully apply to the processing of personal information collected from individuals located in the European Union, and has created new compliance obligations and significantly increased fines for noncompliance. Similarly, as of January 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act imposes certain legal obligations on our use and processing of personal information related to California residents. Finally, new privacy and cybersecurity laws are coming into effect in China. Notwithstanding our efforts to protect the security and integrity of our customers’ personal information, we may be required to expend significant resources to comply with data breach requirements if, for example, third parties improperly obtain and use the personal information of our customers or we otherwise experience a data loss with respect to customers’ personal information. A major breach of our network security and systems may result in fines, penalties and damages and harm our brand, prospects and operating results.

We could be subject to liability, penalties and other restrictive sanctions and adverse consequences arising out of certain governmental investigations and proceedings.

We are cooperating with certain government investigations as discussed in Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. To our knowledge, no government agency in any such ongoing investigation has concluded that any wrongdoing occurred. However, we cannot predict the outcome or impact of any such ongoing matters, and there exists the possibility that we could be subject to liability, penalties and other restrictive sanctions and adverse consequences if the SEC, the U.S. Department of Justice or any other government agency were to pursue legal action in the future. Moreover, we expect to incur costs in responding to related requests for information and subpoenas, and if instituted, in defending against any governmental proceedings.

For example, on October 16, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final judgment approving the terms of a settlement filed with the Court on September 29, 2018, in connection with the actions taken by the SEC relating to Mr. Musk’s statement on August 7, 2018 that he was considering taking Tesla private. Pursuant to the settlement, we, among other things, paid a civil penalty of $20 million, appointed an independent director as the chair of our board of directors, appointed two additional independent directors to our board of directors and made further enhancements to our disclosure controls and other corporate governance-related matters. On April 26, 2019, this settlement was amended to clarify certain of the previously-agreed disclosure procedures, which was subsequently approved by the Court. All other terms of the prior settlement were reaffirmed without modification. Although we intend to continue to comply with the terms and requirements of the settlement, if there is a lack of compliance or an alleged lack of compliance, additional enforcement actions or other legal proceedings may be instituted against us.


We may face regulatory challenges to or limitations on our ability to sell vehicles directly.

While we intend to continue to leverage our most effective sales strategies, including sales through our website, we may not be able to sell our vehicles through our own stores in certain states in the U.S. with laws that may be interpreted to impose limitations on this direct-to-consumer sales model. It has also been asserted that the laws in some states limit our ability to obtain dealer licenses from state motor vehicle regulators, and such assertions persist. In certain locations, decisions by regulators permitting us to sell vehicles have been and may be challenged by dealer associations and others as to whether such decisions comply with applicable state motor vehicle industry laws. We have prevailed in many of these lawsuits and such results have reinforced our continuing belief that state laws were not intended to apply to a manufacturer that does not have franchise dealers. In some states, there have also been regulatory and legislative efforts by dealer associations to propose laws that, if enacted, would prevent us from obtaining dealer licenses in their states given our current sales model. A few states have passed legislation that clarifies our ability to operate, but at the same time limits the number of dealer licenses we can obtain or stores that we can operate. The application of state laws applicable to our operations continues to be difficult to predict.

Internationally, there may be laws in jurisdictions we have not yet entered or laws we are unaware of in jurisdictions we have entered that may restrict our sales or other business practices. Even for those jurisdictions we have analyzed, the laws in this area can be complex, difficult to interpret and may change over time. Continued regulatory limitations and other obstacles interfering with our ability to sell vehicles directly to consumers may harm our financial condition and operating results.

Risks Related to the Ownership of Our Common Stock

The trading price of our common stock is likely to continue to be volatile.

The trading price of our common stock has been highly volatile and could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Our common stock has experienced over the last 52 weeks an intra-day trading high of $389.61$900.40 per share and a low of $242.01$70.10 per share, overas adjusted to give effect to the last 52 weeks.reflect the five-for-one stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend in August 2020 (the “Stock Split”). The stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. BroadIn particular, a large proportion of our common stock has been historically and may in the future be traded by short sellers which may put pressure on the supply and demand for our common stock, further influencing volatility in its market price. Public perception and industryother factors outside of our control may seriously affectadditionally impact the marketstock price of companies’ stock, including ours,companies like us that garner a disproportionate degree of public attention, regardless of actual operating performance. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market andor the market price of a particular company’s securities,our shares, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. Moreover, stockholder litigation like this has been filed against us in the past.us. While we are continuing to defend such actions vigorously, any judgment against us or any future stockholder litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Our financial results may vary significantly from period to period due to fluctuations in our operating costs and other factors.

We expect our period-to-period financial results to vary based on our operating costs, which we anticipate will fluctuate as the pace at which we continue to design, develop and manufacture new products and increase production capacity by expanding our current manufacturing facilities and adding future facilities, may not be consistent or linear between periods. Additionally, our revenues from period to period may fluctuate as we introduce existing products to new markets for the first time and as we develop and introduce new products. As a result of these factors, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our financial results, especially in the short term, are not necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of future performance. Moreover, our financial results may not meet expectations of equity research analysts, ratings agencies or investors, who may be focused only on short-term quarterly financial results. If any of this occurs, the trading price of our stock could fall substantially, either suddenly or over time.

We may fail to meet our publicly announced guidance or other expectations about our business, which could cause our stock price to decline.

We may provide from time to time guidance regarding our expected financial and business performance, such as projections regarding sales and production, as well as anticipated future revenues, gross margins, profitability and cash flows.performance. Correctly identifying key factors affecting business conditions and predicting future events is inherently an uncertain process, and our guidance may not ultimately be accurate.accurate and has in the past been inaccurate in certain respects, such as the timing of new product manufacturing ramps. Our guidance is based on certain assumptions such as those relating to anticipated production and sales volumes and(which generally are not linear throughout a given period), average sales prices, supplier and commodity costs and planned cost reductions. If our guidance is not accurate or varies from actual results due to our inability to meet our assumptions not being met or the impact on our financial performance that could occur as a result of various risks and uncertainties, the market value of our common stock could decline significantly.


Transactions relating to our convertible senior notes may dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders, or may otherwise depress the price of our common stock.

The conversion of some or all of the Tesla Convertible Notesconvertible senior notes issued by us or the Subsidiary Convertible Notesour subsidiaries would dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders to the extent we deliver shares upon conversion of any of such notes. Our 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 and the Subsidiary Convertible Notes have been historically, and the other Tesla Convertible Notes may become in the future, convertible at the option ofnotes by their holders, prior to their scheduled terms under certain circumstances. If holders elect to convert their convertible notes,and we couldmay be required to deliver to them a significant number of shares of our common stock.shares. Any sales in the public market of the common stock issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect their prevailing market prices of our common stock.prices. In addition, the existence of the convertible senior notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of such notes could be used to satisfy short positions, or the anticipated conversion of such notes into shares of our common stock could depress the price of our common stock.

Moreover, in connection with each issuancecertain of the Tesla Convertible Notes,convertible senior notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions, which are expected to reduce the potential dilution and/or offset potential cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount upon conversion of the applicable Tesla Convertible Notes.notes. We also entered into warrant transactions with the hedge counterparties, which could separately have a dilutive effect on our common stock to the extent that the market price per share of our common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants on the applicable expiration dates. In addition, the hedge counterparties or their affiliates may enter into various transactions with respect to their hedge positions, which could also cause or prevent an increase or a decrease inaffect the market price of our common stock or the convertible senior notes.

If Elon Musk has pledgedwere forced to sell shares of our common stock that he has pledged to secure certain bank borrowings. If Mr. Musk were forced to sell these shares pursuant to a margin call that he could not avoid or satisfy,personal loan obligations, such sales could cause our stock price to decline.

Certain banking institutions have made extensions of credit to Elon Musk, our Chief Executive Officer, a portion of which was used to purchase shares of common stock in certain of our public offerings and private placements at the same prices offered to third partythird-party participants in such offerings and placements. We are not a party to these loans, which are partially secured by pledges of a portion of the Tesla common stock currently owned by


Mr. Musk. If the price of our common stock were to decline substantially, and Mr. Musk were unable to avoid or satisfy a margin call with respect to his pledged shares, Mr. Musk may be forced by one or more of the banking institutions to sell shares of Tesla common stock in order to remain within the margin limitations imposed under the terms ofsatisfy his loans.loan obligations if he could not do so through other means. Any such sales could cause the price of our common stock to decline further.

Anti-takeover provisions contained in our governing documents, applicable laws and our convertible senior notes could impair a takeover attempt.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws afford certain rights and powers to our board of directors that could contribute tomay facilitate the delay or prevention of an acquisition that it deems undesirable. We are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and other provisions of Delaware law that limit the ability of stockholders in certain situations to effect certain business combinations. In addition, the terms of our convertible senior notes may require us to repurchase such notes in the event of a fundamental change, including a takeover of our company. Any of the foregoing provisions and terms that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.

 

ITEMITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

None.

ITEMITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

The following table sets forth the location, approximate size and primary use of ourWe are headquartered in Palo Alto, California. Our principal leased and owned facilities:

Location

Approximate

Size (Building)

in Square Feet

Primary Use

Lease

Expiration

Date

Fremont, California

5,500,000

Manufacturing, administration, engineering, service, delivery and warehouse

Owned building

Sparks, Nevada

3,500,000

*

Gigafactory 1, production of lithium-ion battery cells and vehicle drive units

Owned building

Livermore, California

1,002,703

Warehouse

October 2026

Fremont, California

506,490

Administration and manufacturing

September 2029

Tilburg, Netherlands

499,710

Manufacturing, administration, engineering and service

November 2023

Lathrop, California

496,888

Manufacturing

Owned building

Palo Alto, California

350,000

Administration and engineering

January 2020

Lathrop, California

338,564

Warehouse and manufacturing

February 2030

Sparks, Nevada

328,245

Warehouse

December 2020

Sparks, Nevada

304,200

Warehouse

December 2019

Fremont, California

302,400

Engineering

March 2028

Lathrop, California

276,228

Warehouse and manufacturing

September 2024

Lathrop, California

271,075

Manufacturing

May 2025

Fremont, California

229,530

Administration

March 2029

Fremont, California

199,352

Administration and manufacturing

June 2025

Draper, Utah

154,846

Administration

October 2027

Hawthorne, California

132,250

��

Engineering

December 2022

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

130,971

Warehouse

April 2022

Beijing, China

83,119

Delivery hub

April 2020

Amsterdam, Netherlands

73,597

Administration and service

February 2024

San Mateo, California

68,025

Administration

July 2022

* Gigafactory 1 is partially constructed with current occupancy of 3.5 million square feet.


In addition to the properties included in the table above, we also leasefacilities include a large number of properties in North America, Europe and Asia utilized for ourmanufacturing and assembly, warehousing, engineering, retail and service locations, Supercharger sites solar installation and maintenance warehouses and regional administrative and sales offices for our solar business. Furthermore, we will begin leasing a 1.1 million square feet solar manufacturing facility (Gigafactory 2 in Buffalo, New York) upon completion in 2018 for an initial term of 10 years.

offices. Our propertiesfacilities are used to support both of our reporting segments.

segments, and are suitable and adequate for the conduct of our business. We primarily lease such facilities with the exception of some manufacturing facilities. The following table sets forth the location of our primary owned and leased manufacturing facilities.

 

Primary Manufacturing Facilities

Location

Owned or Leased

Fremont Factory

Fremont, California

Owned

Gigafactory Nevada

Sparks, Nevada

Owned

Gigafactory New York

Buffalo, New York

Leased

Gigafactory Shanghai

Shanghai, China

*

Gigafactory Berlin

Grunheide, Germany

Owned

Gigafactory Texas

Austin, Texas

Owned

*

We own the building and the land use rights with an initial term of 50 years. The land use rights are treated as operating lease right-of-use assets.


ITEMITEM 3.

Proceedings RelatedFor a description of our material pending legal proceedings, please see Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, to U.S. Treasurythe consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In July 2012, SolarCity Corporation (“SolarCity”), along with other companies in the solar energy industry, received a subpoena from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Officeaddition, each of the Inspector Generalmatters below is being disclosed pursuant to deliver certain documents in SolarCity’s possessionItem 103 of Regulation S-K because it relates to environmental regulations and aggregate civil penalties that relate to SolarCity’s applications for U.S. Treasury grants. In February 2013, two financing funds affiliated with SolarCity filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims against the U.S. government, seeking to recover $14.0 million that the U.S. Treasury was obligated to pay, but failed to pay, under Section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. In February 2016, the U.S. government filed a motion seeking leave to assert a counterclaim against the two plaintiff funds on the grounds that the U.S. government, in fact, paid them more, not less, than they were entitled to as a matter of law. In September 2017, SolarCity and the U.S. government reached a global settlement of both the investigation and SolarCity’s lawsuit. In that settlement, SolarCity admitted no wrongdoing and agreed to return approximately 5% of the U.S. Treasury cash grants it had received between 2009 and 2013, amounting to $29.5could potentially exceed $1 million. The investigation is now closed and SolarCity’s lawsuit has been dismissed.

Securities Litigation Relating to SolarCity’s Financial Statements and Guidance

On March 28, 2014, a purported stockholder class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against SolarCity and two of its officers. The complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws, and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of SolarCity’s securities from March 6, 2013 to March 18, 2014. After a series of amendments to the original complaint, the District Court dismissed the amended complaint and entered a judgment in our favor on August 9, 2016. The plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal. On December 4, 2017, the Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs’ notice of appeal from the dismissal. We believe that any proceeding that is material to our business or financial condition is likely to have potential penalties far in excess of such amount.

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (“BAAQMD”) has issued notices of violation to us relating to air permitting and related compliance for the claims are without meritFremont Factory, but has not initiated formal proceedings. We have disputed certain of these allegations and intendhave asserted that there has been no related adverse community or environmental impact. While we have not yet resolved this matter, we remain in close communication with BAAQMD with respect to defend against this lawsuitit. We do not currently expect any material adverse impact on our business.

The German Umweltbundesamt has issued our subsidiary in Germany a notice and appeal vigorously. We are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this lawsuit.

On August 15, 2016, a purported stockholder class action lawsuit was filedfine in the U.S. District Court foramount of 12 million euro alleging its non-compliance under applicable laws relating to market participation notifications and take-back obligations with respect to end-of-life battery products required thereunder. This is primarily relating to administrative requirements, but Tesla has continued to take back battery packs, and although we cannot predict the Northern Districtoutcome of California against SolarCity, twothis matter, including the final amount of its officers and a former officer. On March 20, 2017, the purported stockholder class filed a consolidated complaint that includes the original matter in the same court against SolarCity, one of its officers and three former officers. As consolidated, the complaint alleges that SolarCity made projections of future sales and installations that it failed to achieve and that these projections were fraudulent when made. The suit claimed violations of federal securities laws and sought unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of SolarCity’s securities from May 6, 2015 to May 9, 2016. On July 25, 2017, the court took SolarCity’s fully-briefed motion to dismiss under submission. On August 11, 2017, the court granted the motion to dismiss with leave to amend. On September 11, 2017, after lead plaintiff determined he would not amend, the Court dismissed the action with prejudice and entered judgment in favor of SolarCity and the individual defendants.

Securities Litigation Relating to the SolarCity Acquisition

Between September 1, 2016 and October 5, 2016, seven lawsuits were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware by purported stockholders of Tesla challenging our acquisition of SolarCity. Following consolidation, the lawsuit names as defendants the members of Tesla’s board of directors and alleges, among other things, that board members breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the acquisition. The complaint asserts both derivative claims and direct claims on behalf of a purported class and seeks, among other relief, unspecified monetary damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On January 27, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the operative complaint. Rather than respond to the defendants’ motion, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On March 17, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On December 13, 2017, the Court heard oral argument on


the motion and reserved decision. These same plaintiffs filed a parallel action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on April 21, 2017, adding claims for violations of the federal securities laws.

On February 6, 2017, a purported stockholder made a demand to inspect Tesla’s books and records, purportedly to investigate potential breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with the SolarCity acquisition. On April 17, 2017, the purported stockholder filed a petition for a writ of mandate in California Superior Court, seeking to compel Tesla to provide the documents requested in the demand. Tesla filed a demurrer to the writ petition or, in the alternative, a motion to stay the action. On November 9, 2017, the court granted Tesla’s motion and dismissed the action without prejudice.

On March 24, 2017, another lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware by a purported Tesla stockholder challenging the SolarCity acquisition. The complaint alleges, among other things, that Tesla’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the acquisition and alleges violations of the federal securities laws.

We believe that claims challenging the SolarCity acquisition are without merit. We are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any associated with these claims.

Securities Litigation Relating to Production of Model 3 Vehicles

On October 10, 2017, a purported stockholder class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Tesla, Inc., two of its current officers, and a former officer. The complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws, and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of Tesla securities from May 4, 2016 to October 6, 2017. The lawsuit claims that Tesla supposedly made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s preparedness to produce Model 3 vehicles. We believe that the claims are without merit and intend to defend against this lawsuit vigorously. We are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this lawsuit.

Other Matters

From time to time,penalties, we have received requests for information from regulatorsfiled our objection and governmental authorities, such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the National Transportation Safety Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission. We are also subjectit is not expected to various other legal proceedings and claims that arise from the normal course of business activities. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility ofhave a material adverse impact on our resultsbusiness.

We have also received a follow-up information request from the EPA under Section 114(a) of the Clean Air Act of 1963, as amended (the “Clean Air Act”). The EPA is reviewing the compliance of our Fremont Factory operations prospects, cash flows, financial positionwith applicable requirements under the Clean Air Act, and brand.

we are working with the EPA in responding its requests for information. While the outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time, it is not currently expected to have a material adverse impact on our business.

 

ITEMITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

applicable.


PARTPART II

ITEMITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock has traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “TSLA” since it began trading on June 29, 2010. Our initial public offering was priced at $17.00$3.40 per share on June 28, 2010. The following table sets forth, for 2010 as adjusted to give effect to the time period indicated, the high and low closing prices of our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market:

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

First quarter

 

$

280.98

 

 

$

216.99

 

 

$

238.32

 

 

$

143.67

 

Second quarter

 

$

383.45

 

 

$

295.00

 

 

$

265.42

 

 

$

193.15

 

Third quarter

 

$

385.00

 

 

$

308.83

 

 

$

234.79

 

 

$

194.47

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

359.65

 

 

$

299.26

 

 

$

219.74

 

 

$

181.45

 

Stock Split.

Holders

As of January 31, 2018,February 1, 2021, there were 1,1565,353 holders of record of our common stock. A substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares are held by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws, and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.


Stock Performance Graph

This performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference into any filing of Tesla, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

The following graph shows a comparison, from January 1, 20132016 through December 31, 2017,2020, of the cumulative total return on our common stock, The NASDAQ Composite Index and a group of all public companies sharing the same SIC code as us, which is SIC code 3711, “Motor Vehicles and Passenger Car Bodies” (Motor Vehicles and Passenger Car Bodies Public Company Group). Such returns are based on historical results and are not intended to suggest future performance. Data for The NASDAQ Composite Index and the Motor Vehicles and Passenger Car Bodies Public Company Group assumes an investment of $100 on January 1, 20132016 and reinvestment of dividends. We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock nor do we anticipate paying any such cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Exchange of Certain 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2018

On November 15, 2017, we issued 96,634 shares of our common stock to a holder of our 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 in exchange for $12.0 million in aggregate principal amount of such notes, pursuant to a privately negotiated agreement. Such issuance was conducted pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by Rule 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. We relied on this exemption from registration based in part on the representations made by the holder of such notes in the transaction.

In connection with the offering of such notes in 2013, we sold certain warrants to Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“Morgan Stanley”). On November 14, 2017, we agreed with Morgan Stanley to partially terminate such warrants, and in connection with such partial termination, we issued 16,960 shares of our common stock to Morgan Stanley. Such issuance was conducted as a private placement pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by Rule 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and was offered only to persons believed to be either (i) “accredited investors” within the meaning of Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act or (ii) “qualified institutional buyers” within the meaning of Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act. We relied on this exemption from registration based in part on the representations made by Morgan Stanley.

None.


Acquisition of PERBIX Machine Company, Inc.

On November 7, 2017, we issued 34,772 shares of our common stock to the sole shareholder of record of PERBIX Machine Company, Inc., a leader in designing and building custom, high-quality, highly-automated manufacturing equipment (“PERBIX”), as part of the purchase price for all of the outstanding capital stock of PERBIX. Such issuance was conducted pursuant to an exemption from registration provided by Rule 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. We relied on this exemption from registration based in part on the representations made by the selling shareholder.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None

None.

 

ITEMITEM 6.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and from the historical consolidated financial statements not included herein to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented below (in thousands,millions, except per share data).

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016 (1)

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

11,758,751

 

 

$

7,000,132

 

 

$

4,046,025

 

 

$

3,198,356

 

 

$

2,013,496

 

Gross profit

 

$

2,222,487

 

 

$

1,599,257

 

 

$

923,503

 

 

$

881,671

 

 

$

456,262

 

Loss from operations

 

$

(1,632,086

)

 

$

(667,340

)

 

$

(716,629

)

 

$

(186,689

)

 

$

(61,283

)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(1,961,400

)

 

$

(674,914

)

 

$

(888,663

)

 

$

(294,040

)

 

$

(74,014

)

Net loss per share of common stock

   attributable to common stockholders, basic

   and diluted

 

$

(11.83

)

 

$

(4.68

)

 

$

(6.93

)

 

$

(2.36

)

 

$

(0.62

)

Weighted average shares used in computing net

   loss per share of common stock, basic

   and diluted

 

 

165,758

 

 

 

144,212

 

 

 

128,202

 

 

 

124,539

 

 

 

119,421

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019 (3)

 

 

2018 (2)

 

 

2017

 

 

2016 (1)

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

31,536

 

 

$

24,578

 

 

$

21,461

 

 

$

11,759

 

 

$

7,000

 

Gross profit

 

$

6,630

 

 

$

4,069

 

 

$

4,042

 

 

$

2,223

 

 

$

1,599

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

$

1,994

 

 

$

(69

)

 

$

(388

)

 

$

(1,632

)

 

$

(667

)

Net income (loss) attributable to

   common stockholders

 

$

721

 

 

$

(862

)

 

$

(976

)

 

$

(1,962

)

 

$

(675

)

Net income (loss) per share of

   common stock attributable to

   common stockholders (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.74

 

 

$

(0.98

)

 

$

(1.14

)

 

$

(2.37

)

 

$

(0.94

)

Diluted

 

$

0.64

 

 

$

(0.98

)

 

$

(1.14

)

 

$

(2.37

)

 

$

(0.94

)

Weighted average shares used in

   computing net income (loss) per

   share of common stock (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

933

 

 

 

887

 

 

 

853

 

 

 

829

 

 

 

721

 

Diluted

 

 

1,083

 

 

 

887

 

 

 

853

 

 

 

829

 

 

 

721

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019 (3)

 

 

2018 (2)

 

 

2017

 

 

2016 (1)

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital (deficit)

 

$

12,469

 

 

$

1,436

 

 

$

(1,686

)

 

$

(1,104

)

 

$

433

 

Total assets

 

$

52,148

 

 

$

34,309

 

 

$

29,740

 

 

$

28,655

 

 

$

22,664

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

$

14,170

 

 

$

15,532

 

 

$

13,434

 

 

$

15,348

 

 

$

10,923

 

 

(1)

We acquired SolarCity Corporation (“SolarCity”) on November 21, 2016. SolarCity’s financial results of operations have been included in our financial results of operations from the acquisition date. Seedate as previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

(2)

We adopted ASC 606 in 2018. Prior periods have not been revised. For further details, refer to Note 3, Business Combinations, 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding this transaction.the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016 (1)

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working (deficit) capital

 

$

(1,104,150

)

 

$

432,791

 

 

$

(29,029

)

 

$

1,072,907

 

 

$

585,665

 

Total assets

 

 

28,655,372

 

 

 

22,664,076

 

 

 

8,067,939

 

 

 

5,830,667

 

 

 

2,411,186

 

Total long-term obligations

 

 

15,348,310

 

 

 

10,923,162

 

 

 

4,125,915

 

 

 

2,753,595

 

 

 

1,069,535

 

(1)(3)

We acquired SolarCity on November 21, 2016. SolarCity’s financial positionsadopted ASC 842 in 2019. Prior periods have not been included in our financial positions from the acquisition date. Seerevised. For further details, refer to Note 3, Business Combinations, 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regardingthe year ended December 31, 2019.

(4)

Prior period results have been adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. See Note 1, Overview, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this transaction.Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details.

 

 

 


ITEMITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.For discussion related to changes in financial condition and the results of operations for fiscal year 2018-related items, refer to Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2019, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2020.

Overview and 20172020 Highlights

Our mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy. We design, develop, manufacture, lease and sell high-performance fully electric vehicles, solar energy generation systems and energy storage products. We also offer maintenance, installation, operation, financial and other services related to our products.

Automotive

Our production vehicle fleet includes our Model S premium sedan and our Model X sport utility vehicle, which are our highest-performanceIn 2020, we produced 509,737 vehicles and delivered 499,647 vehicles. We are currently focused on increasing vehicle production and capacity, developing and ramping our Model 3, a lower priced sedan designed forbattery cell technology, increasing the mass market which we began to produceaffordability of our vehicles, expanding our global infrastructure and deliver in the second half of 2017. We continue to enhanceintroducing our vehicle offerings with enhanced autopilot options, Internet connectivity and free over-the-air software updates to provide additional safety, convenience and performance features. In addition, we have several future electric vehicles in our product pipeline, including those we unveiled in 2017 – an electric semi-truck and a new version of the Tesla Roadster.next vehicles.

In 2017, our vehicle production capability continued to scale and gain operational efficiencies, and vehicle production volume increased by 20% year-over-year. Additionally, we delivered 101,420 Model S and Model X vehicles and 1,764 Model 3 vehicles in 2017.

Energy Generation and Storage

We lease and sell solar energy systems and sell renewable energy and energy storage products to our customers. We have partnered with Panasonic to provide capital and operational support to manufacture PV cells, thus enabling high volume integrated tile and PV cell production at our Gigafactory 2 in Buffalo, New York. We also recently commenced Solar Roof production at Gigafactory 2. Our energy storage products, which we manufacture at Gigafactory 1, consist of Powerwall mostly for residential applications and Powerpack for commercial, industrial and utility-scale applications.

In late 2017, we completed installation of the largest battery in the world in South Australia. This battery delivers electricity during peak hours to help maintain the reliable operation of South Australia’s electrical infrastructure.

In 2017,2020, we deployed 358 MWh3.02 GWh of energy storage products and 523 MW205 megawatts of solar energy generation.systems. We are currently focused on ramping production of energy storage products, improving our Solar Roof installation capability and efficiency and increasing market share of retrofit solar energy systems.

In 2020, we recognized total revenues of $31.54 billion, representing an increase of $6.96 billion compared to the prior year. We continue to ramp production, build new manufacturing capacity and expand our operations to enable increased deliveries and deployments of our products and further revenue growth.

In 2020, our net income attributable to common stockholders was $721 million, representing a favorable change of $1.58 billion compared to the prior year. In 2020, our operating margin was 6.3%, representing a favorable change of 6.6% compared to the prior year. We continue to focus on operational efficiencies, while we have seen an acceleration of non-cash stock-based compensation expense due to a rapid increase in our market capitalization and updates to our business outlook.

We ended 2020 with $19.38 billion in cash and cash equivalents, representing an increase of $13.12 billion from the end of 2019. Our cash flows from operating activities during 2020 was $5.94 billion, compared to $2.41 billion during 2019, and capital expenditures amounted to $3.16 billion during 2020, compared to $1.33 billion during 2019. Sustained growth has allowed our business to generally fund itself, but we will continue a number of capital-intensive projects in upcoming periods.

Management Opportunities, Challenges and Risks and 20182021 Outlook

Automotive Demand, ProductionImpact of COVID-19 Pandemic

There continues to be worldwide impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. While we have been relatively successful in navigating such impact to date, we have previously been affected by temporary manufacturing closures, employment and Deliveriescompensation adjustments, and impediments to administrative activities supporting our product deliveries and deployments. There are also ongoing related risks to our business depending on the progression of the pandemic, and recent trends in certain regions have indicated potential returns to limited or closed government functions, business activities and person-to-person interactions. Global trade conditions and consumer trends may further adversely impact us and our industries. For example, pandemic-related issues have exacerbated port congestion and intermittent supplier shutdowns and delays, resulting in additional expenses to expedite delivery of critical parts. Similarly, increased demand for personal electronics has created a shortfall of microchip supply, and it is yet unknown how we may be impacted. Please see the “Results of Operations” section of this Item below and certain risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly the first risk factor included there, for more detailed descriptions of the impact and risks to our business.

We drivecannot predict the duration or direction of current global trends from this pandemic, the sustained impact of which is largely unknown, is rapidly evolving and has varied across geographic regions. Ultimately, we continue to monitor macroeconomic conditions to remain flexible and to optimize and evolve our business as appropriate, and we will have to accurately project demand forand infrastructure requirements globally and deploy our vehicles by continually improving our vehicles through over-the-air software updates, expanding our retail, serviceproduction, workforce and charging infrastructure, and by periodically developing and introducing new passenger and commercial electric vehicle variants and models. Our goal is to become the best manufacturer in the automotive industry, and having cutting edge robotic expertise in-house is at the core of that goal. Our recent acquisitions of advanced automation companies have added to our talent base and are helping us increase vehicle production rates more effectively.other resources accordingly.


Automotive—Production

The worldwide automotive market for alternative fuel vehicles and self-driving technology are highly competitive and we expect them to become even more so. Many companies including established automakers have announced plans to expand, and in some cases fully transition to,following is a summary of the status of production of electric or environmentally friendly vehicles,each of our announced vehicle models in production and to also develop self-driving technologies. We welcome the accelerationunder development, as of the world’s transition to sustainable transport. Nonetheless, we believe that the unique featuresdate of our vehicles, our constant innovation, our growing brand, the increased affordability introduced with Model 3, our global Supercharger network and our future vehicles, will continue to generate incremental demand for our vehicles by making our vehicles accessible to larger and previously untapped consumer and commercial markets.this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 


Production Location

Vehicle Model(s)

Production Status

Fremont Factory

Model S and Model X

Active

Model 3 and Model Y

Active

Gigafactory Shanghai

Model 3 and Model Y

Active

Gigafactory Berlin

Model Y

Constructing manufacturing facilities

Gigafactory Texas

Model Y

Constructing manufacturing facilities

Cybertruck

In development

TBD

Tesla Semi

In development

Tesla Roadster

In development

We expect Model S and Model X deliveries to be approximately 100,000 in total in 2018, constrained by the supply of cells with the 18650 form factor used in those vehicles. As our sales network continues to expand to new markets in 2018, we believe vehicle orders should continue to grow. With demand outpacing production, we plan to optimize the trim and option mix in order to optimize revenue and gross margin. We have made significant and sustained progress in the production processesrecently announced updated versions of Model S and Model X featuring a redesigned powertrain and we will continue to improve manufacturing efficiencies for these vehicles in 2018.

We expect Model 3 production and deliveries to grow significantly in 2018. The initial phase of manufacturing any new vehicle is always challenging, and the Model 3 production ramp has been no exception, particularly given our focus on highly automated manufacturing processes, that we expect will ultimately result in higher volumes at significantly lower costs. Model 3 volume production has been less than we initially anticipated due to production bottlenecks, with the battery module assembly line at Gigafactory 1 being the primary production constraint to date, although future bottlenecks in other areas of vehicle manufacturing may surface. We have redirected our best engineering talent to Gigafactory 1 to fine-tune the automated processes and related robotic programming not only to address the challenges we have experienced but also to continue evaluating our overall manufacturing process for efficiencies.

Based on our current progress, we are targeting a production rate of 2,500 Model 3 vehicles per week by the end of the first quarter of 2018 and 5,000 Model 3 vehicles per week by the end of the second quarter. It is important to note that while these are the levelsimprovements. In 2021, we are focused on hittingramping these models on new manufacturing equipment, as well as production rates of Model 3 and Model Y, to at least the capacity that we have plans in place to achieve them, our prior experienceinstalled. The next phase of production growth will depend on the Model 3 ramp has demonstratedconstruction of Gigafactory Berlin and Gigafactory Texas, each of which is progressing as planned for deliveries beginning in 2021. Our goal is to continuously decrease production costs and increase the difficultyaffordability of accurately forecasting specific production rates at specific points in time.our vehicles. We are systematically addressing bottleneckscontinuing to develop and adding capacitymanufacture our own battery cells, with which we are targeting high-volume output, lower capital and resourcesproduction costs and longer range. As cell supply is critical to our business, coupling this strategy with cells from our suppliers will help us stay ahead of any potential constraints.

However, these plans are subject to uncertainties inherent in places likeestablishing and ramping manufacturing operations, which may be exacerbated by the number of concurrent international projects and any future impact from events outside of our control such as the COVID-19 pandemic and any industry-wide component constraints. Moreover, we must meet ambitious technological targets with our plans for battery module line wherecells as well as for iterative manufacturing and design improvements for our vehicles with each new factory.

Automotive—Demand and Sales

Our cost reduction efforts and additional localized procurement and manufacturing are key to our vehicles’ affordability, and for example have allowed us to competitively price our vehicles in China. In addition to opening new factories in 2021, we will also continue to generate demand and brand awareness by improving our vehicles’ functionality, including Autopilot, FSD and software features, and introducing anticipated future vehicles. Moreover, we expect to benefit from ongoing electrification of the automotive sector and increasing environmental awareness.

However, we operate in a cyclical industry that is sensitive to trade, environmental and political uncertainty, all of which may also be compounded by any future global impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, there have been recent signs of recovery from competitors that experienced downturns in 2020, meaning that we will have to continue to execute well to maintain the momentum that we have experienced constraints,gained relative to an ever-growing competitive landscape.

Automotive—Deliveries and these actionsCustomer Infrastructure

As our deliveries increase, we must work constantly to prevent our vehicle delivery capability from becoming a bottleneck on our total deliveries. Situating our factories closer to local markets should result inmitigate the strain on our Model 3 production rate significantlydeliveries. In any case, as we expand, we will have to continue to increase and staff our delivery, servicing and charging infrastructure, maintain our vehicle reliability and optimize our Supercharger locations to ensure cost-effectiveness and customer satisfaction. In particular, we remain focused on increasing during the first half of 2018. In some cases, we may not achieve the manufacturing labor efficiencies until we ramp up to fully automated manufacturing lines, which may take us longer than anticipated.  In order to optimize the incremental improvement of our automation processescapability and the efficiency of our capital expenditures, we will implement the capacity to further ramp production to 10,000 units per week only after we have achieved a 5,000 units per week run rate.

We are also making strides in other aspects of our vehicle production, deliveries and customer infrastructure. For example, we expect to continue to lower the cost of manufacturing our vehicles due to economies of scale, material cost reductions and more efficient manufacturing and equipment utilization. We have achieved cost improvements through material cost reductions from both engineering and commercial actions and increased manufacturing efficiencies including better inventory control for Model S and Model X. We have also seen improved product reliability in our vehicles, batteries and drive units. Likewise, we may experience infrastructure constraints and customer experience issues relating to vehicle deliveries, but are trying to address such issues by opening additional delivery and service centers to scale the volume of vehicles we are able to deliver. Generally, as sales of Tesla vehicles ramp in 2018, we plan to continue to open new Tesla retail, locations, service centers and delivery hubs around the world, we plan continue to expand our mobile repair services, and we plan to significantly increase the number of Superchargers and Destination Charging connectors globally with the goal of remaining ahead of the Model 3 ramp.

We are also making progress with our self-driving technology. An overhaul of the underlying architecture of our software has been completed, which has enabled a step-change improvement in the collection and analysis of data and fundamentally enhanced its machine learning capabilities. The aggregate of such data and learnings, which we refer to as our “neural net,” is able to collect and analyze more high-quality data than ever before, enabling us to rollout a series of new autopilot features in 2018 and beyond.servicing operations.

Energy Generation and Storage Demand, Production and Deployment

The long-term success of this business is dependent upon increasing margins through greater volumes. We are continuingcontinue to reduce customer acquisition costsincrease the production of our energy generation products, including by cutting advertising spend and increasingly selling these products in Tesla stores with dedicated energy product sales personnel and leveraging channel partnerships. Moreover, we have deemphasized absolute volume growth for our solar products, and we have instead prioritized projects for cash generation and profitability. Solar Roof installations will initially ramp slowly in the first half of 2018. As Solar Roof is truly the first-of-its-kind and there is significant complexity in both its manufacturing and installation, we are deliberately ramping production at a gradual pace to


ensure reliability and a great customer experience. With demand outpacing production, we expect our backlog to remain in excess of one year for the next several quarters.

We expect energy storage products to experience significant growth,meet high levels of demand. For Powerwall, better availability and growing grid stability concerns drive higher interest, and cross-selling with our aim beingresidential solar energy products will continue to benefit both product lines. We remain committed to increasing our retrofit solar energy business by offering a low-cost and simplified online ordering experience. In addition, we are working to improve our installation capabilities for Solar Roof by on-boarding and training a large number of installers and reducing the installation time dramatically. As these product lines grow, we will have to maintain adequate battery cell supply for our energy storage products and hire additional personnel, particularly skilled electricians to support the ramp of Solar Roof.


Cash Flow and Capital Expenditure Trends

Our capital expenditures are typically difficult to project beyond the short term given the number and breadth of our core projects at least tripleany given time, and uncertainties in future global market conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic currently makes projections more challenging. We are simultaneously ramping new products in the new Model S and Model X, Model Y and Solar Roof, constructing or ramping manufacturing facilities on three continents and piloting the development and manufacture of new battery cell technologies, and the pace of our capital spend may vary depending on overall priority among projects, the pace at which we meet milestones, production adjustments to and among our various products, increased capital efficiencies and the addition of new projects. Owing and subject to the foregoing as well as the pipeline of announced projects under development and all other continuing infrastructure growth, we currently expect our capital expenditures to be $4.50 to $6.00 billion in 2021 and each of the next two fiscal years.

Our business has recently been consistently generating cash flow from operations in excess of our level of capital spend, and with better working capital management resulting in shorter days sales outstanding than days payable outstanding, our sales growth is also facilitating positive cash generation. On the other hand, we are likely to see heightened levels of capital expenditures during certain periods depending on the specific pace of our capital-intensive projects. Moreover, as our stock price has significantly increased recently, we have seen higher levels of early conversions of “in-the-money” convertible senior notes, which obligates us to deliver cash and or shares pursuant to the terms of those notes. Overall, we expect our ability to be self-funding to continue as long as macroeconomic factors support current trends in 2018.our sales. We are ramping up production for these products atalso opportunistically strengthened our Gigafactory 1 over the next several quarters, but demand is greater than our current production capacity for energy storage.liquidity further through an at-the-market offering of common stock in December 2020, with net proceeds to us of approximately $4.99 billion.

We expect energy generation and storage gross margin to improve significantly in 2018Operating Expense Trends

As long as we entersee expanding sales, and excluding the year with a backlogpotential impact of higher-margin commercial solar projectsnon-cash stock compensation expense attributable to the 2018 CEO Performance Award and a more profitable energy storage business due to overall cost and manufacturing efficiencies from scaling.

Trends in Cash Flow, Capital Expenditures and Operating Expenses

Capital expenditures in 2018 are projected to be slightly more than 2017, with the majority of the spending to support increases in Model 3 production capacity at Gigafactory 1 and the Tesla Factory, and for building additional stores, service centers and Superchargers.

Weimpairment charges on certain assets as explained below, we generally expect operating expenses relative to grow in 2018 as comparedrevenues to 2017, although operating expenses should decrease significantly as a percentage of revenue due to the significant increase in expected revenue in 2018 and as we focus on increasingadditionally increase operational efficiency. The growth in operating expense will mainly be driven by engineering, designefficiency and testingprocess automation.

In March 2018, our stockholders approved a performance-based stock option award to our CEO (the “2018 CEO Performance Award”), consisting of new products or changes to existing products and higher sales and service costs associated with expanding our worldwide geographic presence. In addition, we expect operating expenses to increase as a result of increased selling, general and administrative expenses incurred by our energy generation and storage business.

We are seeking stockholder approval for a new 10-year CEO performance award for Elon Musk with12 vesting tranches contingent on achievingthe achievement of specified market capitalization and operational milestones. If Tesla stockholders approve the award, we wouldWe incur significant additionalnon-cash stock-based compensation expense overfor each tranche only after the term of the award as each performancerelated operational milestone initially becomes probable of vesting.

Automotive Financing Options

We offer loans and leases for our vehicles in certain markets in North America, Europe and Asia primarily through various financial institutions. We offered resale value guarantees or similar buy-back terms to all direct customers who purchase vehicles and who financed their vehicle through onebeing met based on a subjective assessment of our specified commercial banking partners. Subsequent to June 30, 2016,future financial performance, and if this program is available only in certain international markets. Resale value guarantees available for exercise withinhappens following the 12 months following December 31, 2017 totaled $375.7 million in value.

We plan to adopt the new revenue recognition standard ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018. This will impact the waygrant date, we account for vehicle sales withrecord at such time a resale value guarantee and vehicles leased through our leasing partners, which now will qualify to be accounted for as sales with a right of return. In addition, for certain vehicles sales with a resale value guarantee and vehicles leased through leasing partners prior to 2018, we will cease recognizing lease revenue starting in 2018 and record the associated cumulative adjustment to equity under the modified retrospective approach.

Vehicle deliveries with the resale value guarantee do not impact our near-term cash flows and liquidity, since we receive the full amount of cash for the vehicle sales price at delivery. While we do not assume any credit risk related to the customer, if a customer exercises the option to return the vehicle to us, we are exposed to liquidity riskcatch-up expense that the resale value of vehicles under these programs may be lower than our guarantee, or the volume of vehicles returned to us may be higher than our estimates or we may be unable to resell the used cars in a timely manner, all of which could adversely impact our cash flows. Through 2017, we only had an insignificant number of customers who exercised their resale value guarantees and returned their vehicles to us. Based on current market demand for our cars, we estimate the resale prices for our vehicles will continue to be above our resale value guarantee amounts. Should market values of our vehicles or customer demand decrease, these estimates may be impacted materially.

We currently offer vehicle leases in the U.S. for Model S and Model X directly from Tesla Finance, our captive financing entity, as well as through leasing partners. Leasing through Tesla Finance is available in 39 states and the District of Columbia. We also offer financing arrangements through our entities in Canada, Germany and the


United Kingdom. Leasing through our captive financing entities and our leasing partners exposes us to residual value risk. In addition, for leases offered directly from our captive financing entities, we assume customer credit risk. We plan to continue expanding our financing offerings, including our lease financing options and the financial sources to support them, and to support the overall financing needs of our customers. To the extent that we are unable to arrange such options for our customers on terms that are attractive, our sales, financial results and cash flows could be negatively impacted.

Energy Generation and Storage Financing Options

We offer our customers the choice to either purchase and own solar energy systems or to purchase the energy that our solar energy systems produce through various contractual arrangements. These contractual arrangements include long-term leases and power purchase agreements. In both structures, we install our solar energy systems at our customer’s premises and charge the customer a monthly fee. In the lease structure, this monthly payment is fixed with a minimum production guarantee. In the power purchase agreement structure, we charge customers a fee per kilowatt-hour, or kWh,significant based on the amountlength of electricitytime elapsed from the solar energy system actually produces. The leasesgrant date. Moreover, the remaining expense for that tranche is ratably recorded over the period remaining until the later of (i) the expected achievement of the relevant operational milestone (if it has not yet been achieved) and power purchase agreements(ii) the expected achievement of the related market capitalization milestone (if it has not yet been achieved). Upon vesting of a tranche, all remaining associated expense is recognized immediately. Because the expected market capitalization achievements are typicallygenerally later than the related expected operational milestone achievements, the achievement of the former earlier than expected may increase the magnitude of any catch-up expense and/or accelerate the rate at which the remaining expense is recognized. During 2020, several operational milestones became probable and several tranches vested, including as a result of our market capitalization increasing rapidly, resulting in the recognition or acceleration of related expense earlier than anticipated and within a relatively short period of time. See Note 14, Equity Incentive Plans—2018 CEO Performance Award, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for 20 yearsfurther details regarding the stock-based compensation relating to the 2018 CEO Performance Award. As our market capitalization is unpredictable and our financial performance improves, it is possible that the earlier-than-planned recognition of such expenses will continue in the near term.

In January 2021, we updated our investment policy to provide us with more flexibility to further diversify and maximize returns on our cash that is not required to maintain adequate operating liquidity. As part of the policy, we may invest a renewal option, and generally when there is no upfront prepayment,portion of such cash in certain specified alternative reserve assets. Thereafter, we invested an aggregate $1.50 billion in bitcoin under this policy. Moreover, we expect to begin accepting bitcoin as a form of payment for our products in the specified monthly fees arenear future, subject to annual escalations.

For customers who want to purchaseapplicable laws and own solar energy systems, we also offer solar loans, wherebyinitially on a third-party lender provides financing directly to a qualified customer to enable the customer to purchase and own a solar energy system designed, installed and serviced by us. We enter into a standard solar energy system sale and installation agreement with the customer. Separately, the customer enters into a loan agreement with a third-party lender, who finances the full purchase price. We are not a party to the loan agreement between the customer and the third-party lender, and the third-party lender has no recourse against us with respect to the loan.

Gigafactory 1

We continue to develop Gigafactory 1 as a facility where we work together with our suppliers to integrate production of battery material, cells, modules, battery packs and drive units in one location for vehicles and energy storage products. We also continue to invest in the future expansion of Gigafactory 1 and in production equipment for battery cell, module and pack production.

Panasonic has partnered with us on Gigafactory 1 with investments in the production equipment that it uses to manufacture and supply us with battery cells. Under our arrangement with Panasonic, we plan to purchase the full output from their production equipment at negotiated prices. As these terms convey to us the right to use, as defined in ASC 840, Leases, their production equipment, we consider them to be leased assets when production commences. This results in us recording the value of their production equipment within property, plant and equipment, net, on the consolidated balance sheets with a corresponding liability recorded to financing obligations. For all suppliers and partners forlimited basis, which we planmay or may not liquidate upon receipt. Digital assets are considered indefinite-lived intangible assets under applicable accounting rules. Accordingly, any decrease in their fair values below our carrying values for such assets at any time subsequent to purchase the full output from their production equipment located at Gigafactory 1, we will apply similar accounting. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded $473.3 million on the consolidated balance sheet.

While we currently believe that our progress at Gigafactory 1 will allow us to reach our production targets, our ultimate ability to do soacquisition will require us to resolve the types of challenges that are typical ofrecognize impairment charges, whereas we may make no upward revisions for any market price increases until a production ramp. For example,sale. As we have experienced bottleneckscurrently intend to hold these assets long-term, these charges may negatively impact our profitability in the assemblyperiods in which such impairments occur even if the overall market values of battery modules at Gigafactory 1, which has negatively affected our production of Model 3. While we continue to make progress to resolve such issues at Gigafactory 1, given the size and complexity of this undertaking, it is possible that future events could result in the cost of building and operating Gigafactory 1 exceeding our current expectations and Gigafactory 1 taking longer to expand than we currently anticipate.

Gigafactory 2

We have an agreement with the SUNY Foundation for the construction of a factory capable of producing at least 1.0 gigawatts of solar cells annually in Buffalo, New York, referred to as Gigafactory 2. In December 2016, we entered into an agreement with Panasonic under which it will manufacture custom PV cells and modules for us, primarily at Gigafactory 2, and we will purchase certain quantities of PV cells and modules from Panasonic during the 10-year term.

these assets increase.


The terms of our agreement with the SUNY Foundation require us to comply with a number of covenants, and any failure to comply with these covenants could obligate us to pay significant amounts to the SUNY Foundation and result in termination of the agreement. Although we remain on track with our progress at Gigafactory 2, our expectations as to the cost of building the facility, acquiring manufacturing equipment and supporting our manufacturing operations may prove incorrect, which could subject us to significant expenses to achieve the desired benefits.

Other Manufacturing

In addition, we continue to expand production capacity at our Tesla Factory and are exploring additional production capacity in Asia and Europe.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience, as appropriate, and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows willmay be affected.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been uncertainty and disruption in the global economy and financial markets. The estimates used for, but not limited to, determining significant economic incentive for resale value guarantee arrangements, sales return reserves, the collectability of accounts receivable, inventory valuation, fair value of long-lived assets, goodwill, fair value of financial instruments, fair value and residual value of operating lease vehicles and solar energy systems subject to leases could be impacted. We believehave assessed the impact and are not aware of any specific events or circumstances that required an update to our estimates and assumptions or materially affected the following critical accounting policies involve a greater degreecarrying value of judgmentour assets or liabilities as of the date of issuance of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These estimates may change as new events occur and complexity than our other accounting policies. Accordingly,additional information is obtained. Actual results could differ materially from these are the policies we believe are the most critical to understanding and evaluating the consolidated financial condition and results of operations.estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue for products and services when: (i) a persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred and there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; (iii) pricing or fees are fixed or determinable and (iv) collection is reasonably assured.

Automotive Segment

Automotive Sales Revenue

Automotive Sales without Resale Value Guarantee

Automotive sales revenue includes revenues related to deliveries of new vehicles sales of regulatory credits to other automotive manufacturersand pay-per-use charges, and specific other elementsfeatures and services that meet the definition of a deliverableperformance obligation under multiple-element accounting guidance,ASC 606, including free internet connectivity, free access to our Supercharger network, internet connectivity, FSD features and future free over-the-air software updates. These other elementsWe recognize revenue on automotive sales upon delivery to the customer, which is when the control of a vehicle transfers. Payments are valuedtypically received at the point control transfers or in accordance with payment terms customary to the business. Other features and services such as access to our Supercharger network, internet connectivity and over-the-air software updates are provisioned upon control transfer of a vehicle and recognized over time on a stand-alonestraight-line basis as we have a stand-ready obligation to deliver such services to the customer. We recognize revenue related to these other features and we recognize their revenueservices over ourthe performance period, which is generally the expected ownership life of the vehicle or the eight-year life of the vehicle, except for internet connectivity, whichvehicle. Revenue related to FSD features is overrecognized when functionality is delivered to the free four-year period. Ifcustomer. For our obligations related to automotive sales, we sell a deliverable separately, we use that pricing to determine its fair value; otherwise, we use our best estimatedestimate standalone selling price by considering costs used to develop and deliver the service, third-party pricing of similar options and other information that may be available.

At the time of revenue recognition, we reduce the transaction price and record a sales return reserve against revenue for estimated variable consideration related to future product returns. Such estimates arereturns based on historical experience and were immaterial in all periods presented.experience. In addition, any fees that are paid or payable by us to a customer’s lender when we arrange the financing would beare recognized as an offset against automotive sales revenue, in accordance with ASC 605-50, Customer Paymentsrevenue.

Costs to obtain a contract mainly relate to commissions paid to our sales personnel for the sale of vehicles. Commissions are not paid on other obligations such as access to our Supercharger network, internet connectivity, FSD features and Incentives.

Automotive leasing revenue includes revenue recognized under lease accounting guidance forover-the-air software updates. As our direct leasing programscontract costs related to automotive sales are typically fulfilled within one year, the costs to obtain a contract are expensed as well as programs with resale value guarantees. See “Vehicle salesincurred. Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are classified as automotive sales revenue, and we have elected to recognize the cost for freight and shipping when control over vehicles, parts or accessories have transferred to the customer as an expense in cost of automotive sales revenue. Our policy is to exclude taxes collected from a customer from the transaction price of automotive contracts.

Automotive Sales with Resale Value Guarantee or a resale value guarantee,” “Vehicle sales to leasing partners with a resale value guarantee” and “Direct Vehicle Leasing Program” for further details.Buyback Option

Service and other revenue consists of repair and maintenance services, service plans, merchandise, sales of used Tesla vehicles, sales of electric vehicle powertrain components and systems to other manufacturers and sales of non-Tesla vehicle trade-ins.


Vehicle sales to customers with a resale value guarantee

Prior to June 30, 2016, we offeredWe offer resale value guarantees or similar buy-back terms to allcertain international customers who purchasedpurchase vehicles and who financedfinance their vehicles through one of our specified commercial banking partners. Since June 30, 2016, this program is available onlyWe also offer resale value guarantees in connection with automotive sales to certain international markets.leasing partners. Under this program, customers havethese programs, we receive full payment for the vehicle sales price at the time of delivery and our counterparty has the option of selling their vehicle back to us during the guarantee period, which currently is generally at the end of the term of the applicable loan or financing program, for a determinedpre-determined resale value. Although


With the exception of the Vehicle Sales to Leasing Partners with a Resale Value Guarantee and a Buyback Option program discussed within the Automotive Leasing section below, we receive full payment forrecognize revenue when control transfers upon delivery to customers in accordance with ASC 606 as a sale with a right of return as we do not believe the vehicle sales pricecustomer has a significant economic incentive to exercise the resale value guarantee provided to them at contract inception. The process to determine whether there is a significant economic incentive includes a comparison of a vehicle’s estimated market value at the time the option is exercisable with the guaranteed resale value to determine the customer’s economic incentive to exercise. The performance obligations and the pattern of delivery,recognizing automotive sales with resale value guarantees are consistent with automotive sales without resale value guarantees with the exception of our estimate for sales return reserve. Sales return reserves for automotive sales with resale value guarantees are estimated based on historical experience plus consideration for expected future market values. On a quarterly basis, we assess the estimated market values of vehicles under our buyback options program to determine whether there have been changes to the likelihood of future product returns. As we accumulate more data related to the buyback values of our vehicles or as market conditions change, there may be material changes to their estimated values.

Automotive Regulatory Credits

We earn tradable credits in the operation of our automotive business under various regulations related to ZEVs, greenhouse gas, fuel economy and clean fuel. We sell these credits to other regulated entities who can use the credits to comply with emission standards and other regulatory requirements. Payments for automotive regulatory credits are typically received at the point control transfers to the customer, or in accordance with payment terms customary to the business. We recognize revenue on the sale of automotive regulatory credits at the time control of the regulatory credits is transferred to the purchasing party as automotive sales revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.

Automotive Leasing Revenue

Direct Vehicle Operating Leasing Program

We have outstanding leases under our direct vehicle operating leasing programs in the U.S., Canada and in certain countries in Europe. Qualifying customers are permitted to lease a vehicle directly from Tesla for up to 48 months. At the end of the lease term, customers are required to return the vehicles to us or for Model S and Model X leases in certain regions, may opt to purchase the vehicles for a pre-determined residual value. We account for these leasing transactions as operating leases. The amount of sale proceeds equalWe record leasing revenues to the resale value guarantee is deferred until the guarantee expires or is exercised. The remaining sale proceeds are deferred and recognizedautomotive leasing revenue on a straight-line basis over the stated guarantee period to automotive leasing revenue. The guarantee period expires atcontractual term, and we record the earlier of the end of the guarantee period or the pay-off of the initial loan. We capitalize the costdepreciation of these vehicles on the consolidated balance sheet as operating lease vehicles, net, and depreciate their value, less salvage value, to cost of automotive leasing revenue over the same period.revenue.

In cases whereOur policy is to exclude taxes collected from a customer retains ownershipfrom the transaction price of automotive contracts.

Vehicle Sales to Leasing Partners with a vehicle atResale Value Guarantee and a Buyback Option

We offered buyback options in connection with automotive sales with resale value guarantees with certain leasing partner sales in the end ofU.S. and where we expected the guarantee period,customer had a significant economic incentive to exercise the resale value guarantee liability and any remaining deferred revenue balances relatedprovided to the vehicle are settledthem at contract inception, we continued to automotive leasing revenue, and the net book value of the leased vehicle is expensed to cost of automotive leasing revenue. If a customer returns the vehicle to us during the guarantee period, we purchase the vehicle from the customer in an amount equal to the resale value guarantee and settle any remaining deferred balances to automotive leasing revenue, and we reclassify the net book value of the vehicle on the consolidated balance sheet to used vehicle inventory.

Vehicle sales to leasing partners with a resale value guarantee

We also offer resale value guarantees in connection with automobile sales to certain leasing partners. As we have guaranteed the value of these vehicles and as the vehicles are leased to end-customers, we account forrecognize these transactions as interest bearingoperating leases. These transactions entailed a transfer of leases, which we had originated with an end-customer, to our leasing partner. As control of the vehicles had not been transferred in accordance with ASC 606, these transactions were accounted for as interest-bearing collateralized borrowings as required underin accordance with ASC 840.840, Leases, prior to January 1, 2019. Under this program, cash iswas received for the full price of the vehicle and isthe collateralized borrowing value was generally recorded within resale value guarantees forand the long-term portion andcustomer upfront down payment was recorded within deferred revenue for the current portion.revenue. We accreteamortize the deferred revenue amount to automotive leasing revenue on a straight-line basis over the guaranteeoption period and accrue interest expense based on our borrowing rate. We capitalizecapitalized vehicles under this program to operating lease vehicles, net, on the consolidated balance sheet,sheets, and we record depreciation from these vehicles to cost of automotive leasing revenue during the period the vehicle is under a lease arrangement. Cash received for these vehicles, net of revenue recognized during the period, is classified as collateralized lease (repayments) borrowings within cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statementstatements of cash flows. With the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, all new agreements under this program are accounted for as operating leases under ASC 842 and there was no material change in the timing and amount of revenue recognized over the term. Consequently, any cash flows for new agreements are classified as operating cash activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.

At the end of the lease term, we settle our liability in cash by either purchasing the vehicle from the leasing partner for the resale value guaranteebuyback option amount or paying a shortfall to the guaranteeoption amount the leasing partner may realize on the sale of the vehicle. Any remaining balances within deferred revenue and resale value guarantee will be settled to automotive leasing revenue. The end customer can extend the lease for a period of up to 6 months. In cases where the leasing partner retains ownership of the vehicle after the end of our guaranteeoption period, we expense the net value of the leased vehicle to cost of automotive leasing revenue.


OnDirect Sales-Type Leasing Program

We have outstanding direct leases and vehicles financed by us under loan arrangements accounted for as sales-type leases under ASC 842 in certain countries in Asia and Europe, which we introduced in volume during the third quarter of 2020. Depending on the specific program, customers may or may not have a quarterly basis, we assessright to return the estimated market valuesvehicle to us during or at the end of vehicles under our resale value guarantee programthe lease term. If the customer does not have a right to determine if we have sustained a loss on any of these contracts. As we accumulate more data relatedreturn, the customer will take title to the resale valuesvehicle at the end of our vehicles or as market conditions change,the lease term after making all contractual payments. Under the programs for which there mayis a right to return, the purchase option is reasonably certain to be material changesexercised by the lessee and we therefore expect the customer to their estimated values.

Direct Vehicle Leasing Program

We offer atake title to the vehicle leasing program in certain locations inat the North America and Europe.end of the lease term after making all contractual payments. Qualifying customers are permitted to lease a vehicle directly from Teslaunder these programs for up to 48 months. AtOur loan arrangements under these programs can have terms for up to 72 months. We recognize all revenue and costs associated with the endsales-type lease as automotive leasing revenue and automotive leasing cost of the lease term, customers have the optionrevenue, respectively, upon delivery of either returning the vehicle to us or purchasing if for a pre-determined residual value. We account for thesethe customer. Interest income based on the implicit rate in the lease is recorded to automotive leasing transactionsrevenue over time as operating leases, and we recognize leasing revenuescustomers are invoiced on a straight-line basis over the contractual term and record the depreciation of these vehicles to cost of automotive leasing revenue.


Maintenance and Service Plans

We offer a prepaid maintenance program for our vehicles, which includes plans covering maintenance for up to four years or up to 50,000 miles, provided these services are purchased within a specified period of time. The maintenance plans cover annual inspections and the replacement of wear and tear parts, excluding tires and the battery. Payments collected in advance of the performance of service are initially recorded in deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet and recognized in automotive sales as we fulfill our performance obligations.

We also offer an extended service plan, which covers the repair or replacement of vehicle parts for an additional four years or up to an additional 50,000 miles, after the end of our initial New Vehicle Limited Warranty, provided they are purchased within a specified period of time. Payments collected in advance of the performance of service are initially recorded in deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet and recognized in automotive sales ratably over the service coverage periods.monthly basis.

Energy Generation and Storage Segment

ForEnergy Generation and Storage Sales

Energy generation and storage sales revenue consists of the sale of solar energy systems and componentsenergy storage systems to residential, small commercial, and large commercial and utility grade customers, including solar subscription-based arrangements. Energy generation and storage sales whereinrevenue also includes revenue from agreements for solar energy systems and PPAs that commence after January 1, 2019, which is recognized as earned, based on the amount of capacity provided for solar energy systems or electricity delivered for PPAs at the contractual billing rates, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Under the practical expedient available under ASC 606-10-55-18, we recognize revenue based on the value of the service which is consistent with the billing amount. Sales of solar energy systems to residential and small scale commercial customers consist of the engineering, design and installation of the system. Post-installation, residential and small scale commercial customers receive a proprietary monitoring system that captures and displays historical energy generation data. Residential and small scale commercial customers pay the full purchase price either directly or throughof the solar loan program, revenueenergy system upfront. Revenue for the design and installation obligation is recognized when control transfers, which is when we install a solar energy system and the solar energy system passes inspection by the utility or the authority having jurisdiction, provided all otherjurisdiction. Revenue for the monitoring service is recognized ratably as a stand-ready obligation over the warranty period of the solar energy system. Sales of energy storage systems to residential and small scale commercial customers consist of the installation of the energy storage system and revenue recognition criteria haveis recognized when control transfers, which is when the product has been met. delivered or, if we are performing installation, when installed and commissioned. Payment for such storage systems is made upon invoice or in accordance with payment terms customary to the business.

For large commercial and utility grade solar energy system and energy storage system sales which consist of the engineering, design and installation of the system, customers make milestone payments that are consistent with contract-specific phases of a project. Revenue from such contracts is recognized over time using the percentage of completion method based on cost incurred as a percentage of total estimated contract costs for energy storage system sales and as a percentage of total estimated labor hours for solar energy system sales. Certain large-scale commercial and utility grade solar energy system and energy storage system sales also include operations and maintenance service which are negotiated with the design and installation contracts and are thus considered to be a combined contract with the design and installation service. For certain large commercial and utility grade solar energy systems and energy storage systems where the percentage of completion method does not apply, revenue is recognized when control transfers, which is when the product has been delivered to the customer and commissioned for energy storage systems and when the project has received permission to operate from the utility for solar energy systems. Operations and maintenance service revenue is recognized ratably over the respective contract term for solar energy system sales and upon delivery of the service for energy storage system sales. Customer payments for such services are usually paid annually or quarterly in advance.

In instances where there are multiple deliverablesperformance obligations in a single arrangement,contract, we allocate the arrangement consideration to the various elementsobligations in the arrangementcontract based on the relative standalone selling price method. Standalone selling prices are estimated based on estimated costs plus margin or by using market data for comparable products. Costs incurred on the sale of residential installations before the solar energy systems are completed are included as work in inventories as work-in-progressprocess within inventory in the consolidated balance sheet. However, anysheets. Any fees that are paid or payable by us to a solar loan lender would be recognized as an offset against revenue. Costs to obtain a contract relate mainly to commissions paid to our sales personnel related to the sale of solar energy systems and energy storage systems. As our contract costs related to solar energy system and energy storage system sales are typically fulfilled within one year, the costs to obtain a contract are expensed as incurred.


As part of our solar energy system and energy storage system contracts, we may provide the customer with performance guarantees that warrant that the underlying system will meet or exceed the minimum energy generation and storage revenue,or energy performance requirements specified in accordance with ASC 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives. Revenue from anthe contract. In certain instances, we may receive a bonus payment if the system performs above a specified level. Conversely, if a solar energy system or energy storage product salesystem does not meet the performance guarantee requirements, we may be required to pay liquidated damages. Other forms of variable consideration related to our large commercial and utility grade solar energy system and energy storage system contracts include variable customer payments that will be made based on our energy market participation activities. Such guarantees and variable customer payments represent a form of variable consideration and are estimated at contract inception at their most likely amount and updated at the end of each reporting period as additional performance data becomes available. Such estimates are included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable a significant reversal of revenue will not occur.

We record as deferred revenue any non-refundable amounts that are collected from customers related to fees charged for prepayments and remote monitoring service and operations and maintenance service, which is recognized whenas revenue ratably over the product has been delivered, installedrespective customer contract term. 

Energy Generation and accepted by the customer, provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.Storage Leasing

For revenue arrangements where we are the lessor under operating lease agreements for solar energy systems, including energygeneration and storage products, we record lease revenue from minimum lease payments, including upfront rebates and incentives earned from such systems, on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease term, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. For incentives that are earned based on the amount of electricity generated by the system, we record revenue as the amounts are earned. The difference between the payments received and the revenue recognized is recorded as deferred revenue or deferred asset on the consolidated balance sheet.

For solar energy systems where customers purchase electricity from us under PPAs prior to January 1, 2019, we have determined that these agreements should be accounted for in substance, as operating leases pursuant to ASC 840. Revenue is recognized based on the amount of electricity delivered at rates specified under the contracts, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

We record as deferred revenue any amounts that are collected from customers, including lease prepayments, in excess of revenue recognized.recognized and operations and maintenance service fees, which is recognized as revenue ratably over the respective customer contract term. Deferred revenue also includes the portion of rebates and incentives received from utility companies and various local and state government agencies, which areis recognized as revenue over the lease term, as well as the fees charged for remote monitoring service, which is recognized as revenue ratably over the respective customer contract term.

We capitalize initial direct costs from the originationexecution of agreements for solar energy system leases orsystems and PPAs, (i.e.which include the incremental cost of contract administration, referral fees and sales commissions)commissions, as an element of solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net, and subsequently amortize these costs over the term of the related lease or PPA.agreements.

Inventory Valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is computed using standard cost for vehicles and energy storage products, which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. In addition, cost for solar energy systems areis recorded using actual cost. We record inventory write-downs for excess or obsolete inventories based upon assumptions about on current and future demand forecasts. If our inventory on-hand is in excess of our future demand forecast, the excess amounts are written-off.


We also review our inventory to determine whether its carrying value exceeds the net amount realizable upon the ultimate sale of the inventory. This requires us to determine the estimated selling price of our vehicles less the estimated cost to convert the inventory on-hand into a finished product. Once inventory is written-down, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory is established and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.

Should our estimates of future selling prices or production costs change, additional and potentially material increases to this reserve may be required. A small change in our estimates may result in a material charge to our reported financial results.


Warranties

We provide a manufacturer’s warranty on all new and used vehicles production powertrain components and systems and energy products we sell. In addition, we also provide a warranty on the installation and components of the solar energy generation and storage systems we sell for periods typically between 10 to 3025 years. We accrue a warranty reserve for the products sold by us, which includes our best estimate of the projected costs to repair or replace items under warranty.warranties and recalls when identified. These estimates are based on actual claims incurred to date and an estimate of the nature, frequency and costs of future claims. These estimates are inherently uncertain given our relatively short history of sales, and changes to our historical or projected warranty experience may cause material changes to the warranty reserve in the future. The warranty reserve does not include projected warranty costs associated with our vehicles subject to operating lease accounting and our solar energy systems under lease contracts or PPAs, as the costs to repair these warranty claims are expensed as incurred. The portion of the warranty reserve expected to be incurred within the next 12 months is included within accrued liabilities and other, while the remaining balance is included within other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.sheets. Warranty expense is recorded as a component of cost of revenue.revenues in the consolidated statements of operations.

Stock-Based Compensation

We use the fair value method of accounting for our stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted to employees and for our employee stock purchase plan (the “ESPP”) to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for the stock-based awards. The fair value of stock options and ESPPoption awards with only service and/or performance conditions is estimated on the grant or offering date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires inputs such as the risk-free interest rate, expected term and expected volatility. These inputs are subjective and generally require significant judgment. The fair value of RSUs is measured on the grant date based on the closing fair market value of our common stock. The resulting cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the awards, usually the vesting period, which is generally four years for stock options and RSUs and six months for the ESPP. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of actual forfeitures in the period (prior to 2017, net of estimated projected forfeitures).period.

For performance-based awards, stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the expected performance achievement period of individual performance milestones when the achievement of each individual performance milestone becomes probable. For performance-based awards with a vesting schedule based entirely on the attainment of both performance and market conditions, stock-based compensation expense associated with each tranche is recognized for each pair of performance and market conditions over the longer of (i) the expected achievement period offor the performanceoperational milestone for such tranche and (ii) the expected achievement period for the related market conditions,capitalization milestone determined on the grant date, beginning at the point in time thatwhen the relevant performance conditionoperational milestone is considered probable of achievement.being achieved. If such operational milestone becomes probable any time after the grant date, we will recognize a cumulative catch-up expense from the grant date to that point in time. If the related market capitalization milestone is achieved earlier than its expected achievement period and the achievement of the related operational milestone, then the stock-based compensation expense will be recognized over the expected achievement period for the operational milestone, which may accelerate the rate at which such expense is recognized. If additional operational milestones become probable, stock-based compensation expense will be recorded in the period it becomes probable including cumulative catch-up expense for the service provided since the grant date. The fair value of such awards is estimated on the grant date using Monte Carlo simulations.

As we accumulate additional employee stock-based awards data over time and as we incorporate market data related to our common stock, we may calculate significantly different volatilities and expected lives, which could materially impact the valuation of our stock-based awards and the stock-based compensation expense that we will recognize in future periods. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded in cost of revenue,revenues, research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense.expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes

We are subject to federal and state taxes in the U.S. and in many foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We make these estimates and judgments about our future taxable income that are based on assumptions that are consistent with our future plans. Tax laws, regulations and


administrative practices may be subject to change due to economic or political conditions including fundamental changes to the tax laws applicable to corporate multinationals. The U.S., many countries in the European Union and a number of other countries are actively considering changes in this regard. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had recorded a full valuation allowance on our net U.S. deferred tax assets because we expect that it is more likely than not that our U.S. deferred tax assets will not be realized in the foreseeable future.realized. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, the amount of our valuation allowance could be materially impacted.


Furthermore, significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions. In the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax settlement is uncertain. As a result, we recognize the effect of this uncertainty on our tax attributes or taxes payable based on our estimates of the eventual outcome. These effects are recognized when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are supportable, we believe that it is more likely than not that some of those positions may not be fully sustained upon review by tax authorities. We are required to file income tax returns in the U.S. and various foreign jurisdictions, which requires us to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions. Such returns are subject to audit by the various federal, state and foreign taxing authorities, who may disagree with respect to our tax positions. We believe that our consideration is adequate for all open audit years based on our assessment of many factors, including past experience and interpretations of tax law. We review and update our estimates in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit, the lapse of a statute of limitations or a change in estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters differs from our expectations, such differences may impact income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made. The eventual impact on our income tax expense depends in part if we still have a valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets in the period that such determination is made.

On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) was enacted into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a federal corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. We are required to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment, such as re-measuring our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities as well as reassessing the net realizability of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Tax Act did not give rise to any material impact on the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations due to our historical worldwide loss position and the full valuation allowance on our net U.S. deferred tax assets.

In December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“SAB 118”), which allows us to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year from the enactment date. Since the Tax Act was enacted late in the fourth quarter of 2017 (and ongoing guidance and accounting interpretations are expected over the next 12 months), we consider the accounting of deferred tax re-measurements and other items, such as state tax considerations, to be incomplete due to the forthcoming guidance and our ongoing analysis of final year-end data and tax positions. We expect to complete our analysis within the measurement period in accordance with SAB 118. We do not expect any subsequent adjustments to have any material impact on the consolidated balance sheets or statements of operations due to our historical worldwide loss position and the full valuation allowance on our net U.S. deferred tax assets.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements reflect our accounts and operations and those of our subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 810, Consolidation, we consolidate any variable interest entity (“VIE”) of which we are the primary beneficiary. We form VIEs with our financing fund investors in the ordinary course of business in order to facilitate the funding and monetization of certain attributes associated with our solar energy systems.systems and leases under our direct vehicle leasing programs. The typical condition for a controlling financial interest ownership is holding a majority of the voting interests of an entity; however, a controlling financial interest may also exist in entities, such as VIEs, through arrangements that do not involve controlling voting interests. ASC 810 requires a variable interest holder to consolidate a VIE if that party has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We do not consolidate a VIE in which we have a majority ownership interest when we are not


considered the primary beneficiary. We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of a number ofall the VIEs. We evaluate our relationships with all the VIEs on an ongoing basis to ensure that we continue to be the primary beneficiary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Noncontrolling Interests and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests represent third-party interests in the net assets under certain funding arrangements, or funds, that we enter into to finance the costs of solar energy systems and vehicles under operating leases. We have determined that the contractual provisions of the funds represent substantive profit sharing arrangements. We have further determined that the appropriate methodology for calculating the noncontrolling interest and redeemable noncontrolling interest balances that reflects the substantive profit sharing arrangements is a balance sheet approach using the hypothetical liquidation at book value (“HLBV”) method. We, therefore, determine the amount of the noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests in the net assets of the funds at each balance sheet date using the HLBV method, which is presented on the consolidated balance sheet as noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and redeemable noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries. Under the HLBV method, the amounts reported as noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests in the consolidated balance sheet represent the amounts the third-partiesthird parties would hypothetically receive at each balance sheet date under the liquidation provisions of the funds, assuming the net assets of the funds were liquidated at their recorded amounts determined in accordance with GAAP and with tax laws effective at the balance sheet date and distributed to the third-parties.third parties. The third-parties’third parties’ interests in the results of operations of the funds are determined as the difference in the noncontrolling interest and redeemable noncontrolling interest balances in the consolidated balance sheets between the start and end of each reporting period, after taking into account any capital transactions between the funds and the third-parties.third parties. However, the redeemable noncontrolling interest balance is at least equal to the redemption amount. The redeemable noncontrolling interest balance is presented as temporary equity in the mezzanine section of the consolidated balance sheet since these third-partiesthird parties have the right to redeem their interests in the funds for cash or other assets.

Business Combinations

We account for business acquisitions under ASC 805, Business Combinations. The total purchase consideration for an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. Costs that are directly For certain funds, there may be significant fluctuations in net income (loss) attributable to the acquisition are expensed as incurred. Identifiable assets (including intangible assets), liabilities assumed (including contingent liabilities)noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests in an acquisition are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. We recognize goodwill if the fair value of the total purchase consideration and any noncontrolling interests is in excess of the net fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. We recognize a bargain purchase gain within other income (expense), net, on the consolidated statement of operations if the net fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed is in excess of the fair value of the total purchase consideration and any noncontrolling interests. We include the results of operations of the acquired businesssubsidiaries due to changes in the consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date.

When determining such fair values, we make significant estimates and assumptions. Critical estimates include, butliquidation provisions as time-based milestones are not limited to, future expected cash flows from the underlying assets and discount rates. Our estimate of fair values is based on assumptions believed to be reasonable but that are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. As a result, actual results may differ from our estimates. Furthermore, our estimates might change as additional information becomes available, as more fully discussed in Note 3, Business Combinations, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

reached.

 


Results of Operations

Effects of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted our business and financial results in 2020.

The temporary suspension of production at our factories during the first half of 2020 caused production limitations that, together with reduced or closed government and third party partner operations in the year, negatively impacted our deliveries and deployments in 2020. While we resumed operations at all of our factories worldwide, our temporary suspension at our factories resulted in idle capacity charges as we still incurred fixed costs such as depreciation, certain payroll related expenses and property taxes. As part of our response strategy to the business disruptions and uncertainty around macroeconomic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, we instituted cost reduction initiatives across our business globally to be commensurate to the scope of our operations while they were scaled back in the first half of 2020. This included temporary labor cost reduction measures such as employee furloughs and compensation reductions. Additionally, we suspended non-critical operating spend and opportunistically renegotiated supplier and vendor arrangements. As part of various governmental responses to the pandemic granted to companies globally, we received certain payroll related benefits which helped to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our financial results. Such payroll related benefits related to our direct headcount have been primarily netted against our disclosed idle capacity charges and they marginally reduced our operating expenses. The impact of the idle capacity charges incurred during the first half of 2020 were almost entirely offset by our cost savings initiatives and payroll related benefits.

Revenues

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Change 2017 vs. 2016

 

 

Change 2016 vs. 2015

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020 vs. 2019 Change

 

 

2019 vs. 2018 Change

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Automotive sales

 

$

8,534,752

 

 

$

5,589,007

 

 

$

3,431,587

 

 

$

2,945,745

 

 

 

53

%

 

$

2,157,420

 

 

 

63

%

 

$

26,184

 

 

$

19,952

 

 

$

17,632

 

 

$

6,232

 

 

 

31

%

 

$

2,320

 

 

 

13

%

Automotive leasing

 

 

1,106,548

 

 

 

761,759

 

 

 

309,386

 

 

 

344,789

 

 

 

45

%

 

 

452,373

 

 

 

146

%

 

 

1,052

 

 

 

869

 

 

 

883

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

21

%

 

 

(14

)

 

 

-2

%

Total automotive

revenues

 

 

9,641,300

 

 

 

6,350,766

 

 

 

3,740,973

 

 

 

3,290,534

 

 

 

52

%

 

 

2,609,793

 

 

 

70

%

 

 

27,236

 

 

 

20,821

 

 

 

18,515

 

 

 

6,415

 

 

 

31

%

 

 

2,306

 

 

 

12

%

Services and other

 

 

1,001,185

 

 

 

467,972

 

 

 

290,575

 

 

 

533,213

 

 

 

114

%

 

 

177,397

 

 

 

61

%

 

 

2,306

 

 

 

2,226

 

 

 

1,391

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

835

 

 

 

60

%

Total automotive &

services and other

segment revenue

 

 

10,642,485

 

 

 

6,818,738

 

 

 

4,031,548

 

 

 

3,823,747

 

 

 

56

%

 

 

2,787,190

 

 

 

69

%

 

 

29,542

 

 

 

23,047

 

 

 

19,906

 

 

 

6,495

 

 

 

28

%

 

 

3,141

 

 

 

16

%

Energy generation and

storage segment revenue

 

 

1,116,266

 

 

 

181,394

 

 

 

14,477

 

 

 

934,872

 

 

 

515

%

 

 

166,917

 

 

 

1153

%

 

 

1,994

 

 

 

1,531

 

 

 

1,555

 

 

 

463

 

 

 

30

%

 

 

(24

)

 

 

-2

%

Total revenues

 

$

11,758,751

 

 

$

7,000,132

 

 

$

4,046,025

 

 

$

4,758,619

 

 

 

68

%

 

$

2,954,107

 

 

 

73

%

 

$

31,536

 

 

$

24,578

 

 

$

21,461

 

 

$

6,958

 

 

 

28

%

 

$

3,117

 

 

 

15

%

 

Automotive & Services and Other Segment

Automotive sales revenue includes revenues related to salecash deliveries of new Model S, Model X, Model 3 and Model 3Y vehicles, including access to our Supercharger network, internet connectivity, Supercharger access,FSD features and specifiedover-the-air software updates, for cars equipped with autopilot hardware, as well as sales of regulatory credits to other automotive manufacturers. Cash deliveries are vehicles that are not subject to lease accounting. Our revenue from regulatory credits fluctuates depending on when a contract is executed with a buyer and when the credits are delivered.

Automotive leasing revenue includes the amortization of revenue for Model S and Model X vehicles under direct operating lease agreements as well as those sold with resale value guarantees accounted for as operating leases under lease accounting. We do not yet offerbegan offering direct leasing for Model 3 vehicles.vehicles in the second quarter of 2019 and we began offering direct leasing for Model Y vehicles in the third quarter of 2020. Additionally, automotive leasing revenue includes direct sales-type leasing programs where we recognize all revenue associated with the sales-type lease upon delivery to the customer, which we introduced in volume during the third quarter of 2020.

Services and other revenue consists of maintenancenon-warranty after-sales vehicle services, sales of used vehicles, retail merchandise, sales by our acquired subsidiaries to third party customers and sales of electric vehicle powertrain components and systemsinsurance revenue.


2020 compared to other manufacturers.

2017 Compared to 20162019

Automotive sales revenue increased $2.95$6.23 billion, or 53%31%, during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily related to a 58% increase in deliveries to 80,060 vehicles resulting from increased sales of Model S and Model X, at average selling prices that remained relatively consistent as compared to the prior period, as well as sales of 1,764 Model 3 vehicles since its launch in the third quarter of 2017. Additionally there was an increase of $58.0 million to $360.3 million in sales of regulatory credits offset partially by additional deferrals of autopilot 2.0 revenue in the year ended December 31, 2017.

Automotive leasing revenue increased $344.8 million, or 45%, during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to an approximately 30% increase in the number of vehicles under leasing programs or programs with a resale value guarantee compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized an increase of $23.4 million of automotive leasing revenue upon early payoff and expiration of resale value guarantees2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.

Service2019, primarily due to an increase of 129,268 Model 3 and other revenue increased $533.2Model Y cash deliveries despite production limitations as a result of temporary suspension of production at the Fremont Factory and Gigafactory Nevada during the first half of 2020. We were able to increase deliveries year over year from production ramping at both Gigafactory Shanghai and the Fremont Factory. There was also an increase of $986 million or 114%,from additional sales of regulatory credits to $1.58 billion in the year ended December 31, 2020. Additionally, due to pricing adjustments we made to our vehicle offerings during the year ended December 31, 20172019, we estimated that there was a greater likelihood that customers would exercise their buyback options and adjusted our sales return reserve on vehicles previously sold under our buyback options program which resulted in a reduction of automotive sales revenue of $555 million. We made further pricing adjustments that resulted in a similar but smaller reduction of automotive sales revenue of $72 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. The smaller reduction in revenue from pricing adjustments resulted in a positive impact to automotive sales revenue of $483 million year over year. These factors increasing automotive sales revenue were partially offset by a decrease in the combined average selling price of Model 3 and Model Y. Despite the inclusion of higher priced Model Y deliveries in 2020, the combined average selling price of Model 3 and Model Y decreased due to a higher proportion of Model 3 Standard Range variants in our sales mix compared to the prior year. Additionally, there was a decrease in automotive sales revenue from 8,669 fewer Model S and Model X cash deliveries at a relatively consistent combined average selling price in the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the prior year.

Automotive leasing revenue increased $183 million, or 21%, in the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This was2019, primarily due to an increase in used vehicle sales as a resultcumulative vehicles under our direct operating lease program and the introduction of increased automotive sales as well as from the expansion of our trade-in program. Additionally, there was a $41.1 million increase from the inclusion of engineering service revenue from Grohmann,direct sales-type leasing programs which we acquired on January 3, 2017,began offering in volume during the third quarter of 2020 where we recognize all revenue associated with the sales-type lease upon delivery to the customer. These increases were partially offset by the decreases in automotive leasing revenue associated with our resale value guarantee leasing programs accounted for as operating leases as those portfolios have declined.

Services and a $68.4other revenue increased $80 million, increaseor 4%, in maintenance services revenue as our fleet continued to grow during the year ended December 31, 2017.


2016 Compared to 2015

Automotive sales revenue increased $2.16 billion, or 63% to $5.59 billion during the year ended December 31, 20162020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily related to a 55% increase in vehicle deliveries to approximately 50,700. The increase in volume is2019, primarily due to a full-year of Model X deliveries in 2016, as well as increased production and sales of Model S. Further, there was an overall increase in average selling price of 6% primarily duenon-warranty maintenance services revenue as our fleet continues to the introduction of Model X which are higher priced vehicles compared to Model S. In addition, there isgrow, an increase in retail merchandise revenue and an increase in sales by our acquired subsidiaries to third party customers as we had a partial year of $133.4 million to $302.3 million ofsales in the sale of regulatory creditsprior year from the year ended December 31, 2015 to the corresponding period in 2016.our mid-year 2019 acquisitions. These increases were partially offset by negative impact from the movement of foreign currency exchange rates.

Automotive leasing revenue increased $452.4 million, or 146%, to $761.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to an 83% increase in cumulative vehicle deliveries under leasing programs and programs with a resale value guarantee from the year ended December 31, 2015 to the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized $112.6 million in automotive leasing revenue upon the expiration of resale value guarantees.

Service and other revenue increased $177.4 million, or 61%, to $468.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to an increase of $117.4 milliondecrease in used vehicle sales as we received more trade-ins and an increaserevenue driven by a reduction in maintenance service revenue of $66.6 million as our fleet continues to grow.non-Tesla trade-ins.

Energy Generation and Storage Segment

Energy generation and storage revenue includes salesales and leasing of solar energy systemsgeneration and energy storage products, leasing revenue from solar energy systems under operating leasesservices related to such products and PPAs and the salesales of solar energy systems incentives.

2017 Compared2020 compared to 20162019

Energy generation and storage revenue increased by $934.9$463 million, or 515%30%, duringin the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, predominantly due to the inclusion of the full-year of revenue from our solar business, which we gained by acquiring SolarCity on November 21, 2016.

2016 Compared to 2015

Energy generation and storage revenue increased $166.9 million, or 1,153%,2019, primarily due to $84.1 millionincreases in deployments of Megapack, solar cash and loan jobs and Powerwall, partially offset by a decrease in deployments of Powerpack and reduced average selling prices on our solar cash and loan jobs as a result of our low cost solar strategy. Powerpack deployments have decreased following the inclusionintroduction of revenue from SolarCity from the acquisition date of November 21, 2016 through December 31, 2016, as well as an increase of $82.8 millionour Megapack product, which we began deploying in energy storage revenue as we ramped up our energy storage sales effort and completed several utility scale projects such as Southern California Edison Mira Loma substation.

late 2019.


Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Change 2017 vs. 2016

 

 

Change 2016 vs. 2015

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Automotive sales

 

$

6,724,480

 

 

$

4,268,087

 

 

$

2,639,926

 

 

$

2,456,393

 

 

 

58

%

 

$

1,628,161

 

 

 

62

%

Automotive leasing

 

 

708,224

 

 

 

481,994

 

 

 

183,376

 

 

 

226,230

 

 

 

47

%

 

 

298,618

 

 

 

163

%

Total

   automotive

   cost of

   revenues

 

 

7,432,704

 

 

 

4,750,081

 

 

 

2,823,302

 

 

 

2,682,623

 

 

 

56

%

 

 

1,926,779

 

 

 

68

%

Services and other

 

 

1,229,022

 

 

 

472,462

 

 

 

286,933

 

 

 

756,560

 

 

 

160

%

 

 

185,529

 

 

 

65

%

Total

   automotive &

   services and other

   segment

   cost of

   revenue

 

 

8,661,726

 

 

 

5,222,543

 

 

 

3,110,235

 

 

 

3,439,183

 

 

 

66

%

 

 

2,112,308

 

 

 

68

%

Energy generation

   and storage

   segment

 

 

874,538

 

 

 

178,332

 

 

 

12,287

 

 

 

696,206

 

 

 

390

%

 

 

166,045

 

 

 

1351

%

Total cost of

   revenues

 

$

9,536,264

 

 

$

5,400,875

 

 

$

3,122,522

 

 

$

4,135,389

 

 

 

77

%

 

$

2,278,353

 

 

 

73

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit total

   automotive

 

$

2,208,596

 

 

$

1,600,685

 

 

$

917,671

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin total

   automotive

 

 

23

%

 

 

25

%

 

 

25

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit total

   automotive

   & services and

   other segment

 

$

1,980,759

 

 

$

1,596,195

 

 

$

921,313

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin total

   automotive

   & services and

   other segment

 

 

19

%

 

 

23

%

 

 

23

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit energy

   generation

   and storage segment

 

$

241,728

 

 

$

3,062

 

 

$

2,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin energy

   generation and storage

   segment

 

 

22

%

 

 

2

%

 

 

15

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total gross profit

 

$

2,222,487

 

 

$

1,599,257

 

 

$

923,503

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total gross margin

 

 

19

%

 

 

23

%

 

 

23

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020 vs. 2019 Change

 

 

2019 vs. 2018 Change

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Automotive sales

 

$

19,696

 

 

$

15,939

 

 

$

13,686

 

 

$

3,757

 

 

 

24

%

 

$

2,253

 

 

 

16

%

Automotive leasing

 

 

563

 

 

 

459

 

 

 

488

 

 

 

104

 

 

 

23

%

 

 

(29

)

 

 

-6

%

Total automotive cost of revenues

 

 

20,259

 

 

 

16,398

 

 

 

14,174

 

 

 

3,861

 

 

 

24

%

 

 

2,224

 

 

 

16

%

Services and other

 

 

2,671

 

 

 

2,770

 

 

 

1,880

 

 

 

(99

)

 

 

-4

%

 

 

890

 

 

 

47

%

Total automotive & services and other

   segment cost of revenues

 

 

22,930

 

 

 

19,168

 

 

 

16,054

 

 

 

3,762

 

 

 

20

%

 

 

3,114

 

 

 

19

%

Energy generation and storage segment

 

 

1,976

 

 

 

1,341

 

 

 

1,365

 

 

 

635

 

 

 

47

%

 

 

(24

)

 

 

-2

%

Total cost of revenues

 

$

24,906

 

 

$

20,509

 

 

$

17,419

 

 

$

4,397

 

 

 

21

%

 

$

3,090

 

 

 

18

%

Gross profit total automotive

 

$

6,977

 

 

$

4,423

 

 

$

4,341

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin total automotive

 

 

26

%

 

 

21

%

 

 

23

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit total automotive & services and other

   segment

 

$

6,612

 

 

$

3,879

 

 

$

3,852

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin total automotive & services and other

   segment

 

 

22

%

 

 

17

%

 

 

19

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit energy generation and storage segment

 

$

18

 

 

$

190

 

 

$

190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin energy generation and storage segment

 

 

1

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total gross profit

 

$

6,630

 

 

$

4,069

 

 

$

4,042

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total gross margin

 

 

21

%

 

 

17

%

 

 

19

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Automotive & Services and Other Segment

Cost of automotive sales revenue includes direct parts, material and labor costs, manufacturing overhead, including depreciation costs of tooling and machinery, shipping and logistic costs, vehicle connectivity costs, allocations of electricity and infrastructure costs related to our Supercharger network and reserves for estimated warranty expenses. Cost of automotive sales revenues also includes adjustments to warranty expense and charges to write down the carrying value of our inventory when it exceeds its estimated net realizable value and to provide for obsolete and on-hand inventory in excess of forecasted demand.

Cost of automotive leasing revenue includes primarily the amortization of operating lease vehicles over the lease term, cost of goods sold associated with direct sales-type leases which were introduced in volume in the third quarter of 2020, as well as warranty expenses recognized as incurred.related to leased vehicles. Cost of automotive leasing revenue also includes vehicle connectivity costs and allocations of electricity and infrastructure costs related to our Supercharger network for vehicles under our leasing programs.

Cost of services and other revenue includes costs associated with providing non-warranty after-sales services, costs to acquire and certify used vehicles, costs for retail merchandise, and costs to provide vehicle insurance. Cost of services and other revenue also includes direct parts, material and labor costs and manufacturing overhead associated with the sales of electric vehicle powertrain components and systemsby our acquired subsidiaries to other manufacturers, costs associated with providing maintenance services and coststhird party customers.

2020 compared to acquire and certify used vehicles.

2017 Compared to 20162019

Cost of automotive sales revenuesrevenue increased $2.46$3.76 billion, or 58%24%, duringin the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This was2019, primarily due to an increase of 129,268 Model 3 and Model Y cash deliveries. Due to pricing adjustments we made to our vehicle offerings during the year ended December 31, 2019, we estimated that there was a 58%greater likelihood that customers would exercise their buyback options and if customers elect to exercise the buyback option, we expect to be able to subsequently resell the returned vehicles, which resulted in a reduction of cost of automotive sales revenue of $451 million. We made further pricing adjustments that resulted in a similar but smaller reduction of cost of automotive sales revenue of $42 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. Additionally, there was an increase to cost of automotive sales revenue from idle capacity charges of $213 million as a result of temporary suspension of production at the Fremont Factory and Gigafactory Nevada during the first half of 2020. These factors increasing cost of automotive sales revenue were partially offset by a decrease in vehicle deliveries resultingaverage Model 3 costs per unit due to lower material, manufacturing, freight and duty costs from increasedlocalized procurement and manufacturing in China and a higher sales mix of lower end trims, as well as a decrease of 8,669 Model S and Model X as well as the commencement ofcash deliveries of Model 3 in the third quarter of 2017.year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the prior year.


Cost of automotive leasing revenue increased $226.2$104 million, or 47%23%, duringin the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This was2019, primarily due to an approximately 30% increase in the number ofcumulative vehicles under our direct operating lease program and the introduction of direct sales-type leasing programs or programswhich we began offering in volume during the third quarter of 2020 where we recognize all cost of revenue associated with athe sales-type lease upon delivery to the customer. These increases were partially offset by the decreases in cost of automotive lease revenue associated with our resale value guarantee leasing programs which are accounted for as operating leases as those portfolios have declined.

Cost of services and other revenue decreased $99 million, or 4%, in the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, during2019, primarily due to a decrease in used vehicle cost of revenue driven by a reduction in non-Tesla trade-ins, partially offset by increases in non-warranty maintenance services as our fleet continues to grow and an increase in costs of retail merchandise as our sales have increased.

Gross margin for total automotive increased from 21% to 26% in the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized an increase of $23.4 million in cost of automotive leasing revenue upon early payoff and the expiration of resale value guarantees.

Cost of services and other revenue increased $756.6 million, or 160%, during the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, primarily due to an improvement of Model 3 gross margin primarily from lower material, manufacturing, freight and duty costs from localized procurement and manufacturing in China, partially offset by a decrease in the increase in costaverage selling price of used vehicle salesModel 3 due to increased volume and the increasea higher proportion of Model 3 Standard Range variants in cost to provide maintenance services as our fleet continues to grow.

Gross margin for total automotive decreased from 25% to 23% during the year ended December 31, 2017sales mix compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The commencementprior year. Additionally, there was an increase of $986 million in sales of regulatory credits and a positive impact from Model Y deliveries ofin 2020 as Model 3 in the third quarter of 2017 whereby the full operating costs and depreciation were recorded at much lower production volumes as production ramps,Y gross margin was higher current period early payoffs and expirations of resale value guarantees, as compared to the same period in thethan our prior year contributed to the lowertotal automotive gross margin. Lower material and manufacturing costs for Model S and Model X, as we further improved our vehicle production processes and the partial recognition of autopilot 2.0 revenue in the current periodThese increases were partially offset the overall decrease.

Gross margin for total automotive & services and other segment decreased from 23% to 19% during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. These decreases are driven by the factors impacting gross margin for total automotive, as explained above, as well as higher costsidle capacity charges of maintenance service.

2016 Compared to 2015

Cost of automotive revenues increased $1.63 billion, or 62%, to $4.27 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to a 55% increase in vehicle deliveries$213 million as a result of a full-yeartemporary suspension of Model X deliveries as well as increased deliveries for Model S. In addition,production at the increase is due to product mix as Model X has a higher cost structure than Model S. The increase in cost of automotive revenue is partially offset by a reduction of warranty expense of $20.0 million resulting from better vehicle reliability.  


Cost of automotive leasing revenue increased $298.6 million, or 163%, to $482.0 millionFremont Factory and Gigafactory Nevada during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase is primarily due to an 83% increase in cumulative vehicle deliveries under leasing programs and programs with resale value guarantees from the year ended December 31, 2015 to the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized $114.3 million in costfirst half of automotive leasing revenues upon the expiration of resale value guarantees.2020.

Cost of services and other revenue increased $185.5 million, or 65%, to $472.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to an increase of $120.8 million in cost of used vehicle sales due to increase in volume, and an increase of $64.9 million in cost to provide maintenance service as our fleet continues to grow.

Gross margin for total automotive remained consistent during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.

Gross profit for total automotive & services and other segment increased from $921.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $1.60 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016. Gross margin for total automotive & services and other segment increased from 22.9% for17% to 22% in the year ended December 31, 20152020 as compared to 23.4% for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was 2019, primarily due to the automotive gross margin impacts discussed above and a lower materialproportion of services and manufacturingother, which operated at a lower gross margin than our automotive business, within the segment in the year ended December 31, 2020. Additionally, there was an improvement in our non-warranty maintenance services gross margin due to increased operational efficiencies despite additional costs as we further improve our production processes, partially offset by a negative impact from the movement in foreign exchange and increased expenditures to build out ourramping service centers to accommodate a larger deployed fleet and provide maintenance.an improvement in our used vehicle sales gross margin.

Energy Generation and Storage Segment

Cost of energy generation and storage revenue includes direct and indirect material and labor costs, warehouse rent, freight, warranty expense, other overhead costs and amortization of certain acquired intangible assets. Cost of energy generation and storage revenue also includes charges to write down the carrying value of our inventory when it exceeds its estimated net realizable value and to provide for obsolete and on-hand inventory in excess of forecasted demand. In agreements for solar energy systemssystem and PPAs where we are the lessor, the cost of revenue is primarily comprised of depreciation of the cost of leased solar energy storage products and the depreciation expense andsystems, maintenance costs associated with leased solar energy systems.those systems and amortization of any initial direct costs.

2017 Compared2020 compared to 20162019

Cost of energy generation and storage revenue increased by $696.2$635 million, or 390%47%, duringin the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This was2019, primarily due to the inclusionincreases in deployments of the full-year ofMegapack, higher costs from temporary manufacturing underutilization of our solar business, which we gainedSolar Roof ramp, increases in deployments of Powerwall and idle capacity charges of $20 million as a result of temporary suspension of production at Gigafactory New York during the first half of 2020. These increases were partially offset by acquiring SolarCity on November 21, 2016.a decrease in deployments of Powerpack.

Gross margin for energy generation and storage increaseddecreased from 2%12% to 22% during1% in the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This was predominantly2019 primarily due to the inclusiona higher proportion of the full-year of revenue and costs fromSolar Roof in our solaroverall energy business which we gained by acquiring SolarCity.

2016 Compared to 2015

Cost of energy generation and storage revenue increased $166.0 million to $178.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was due to an increase of $67.0 millionoperated at lower gross margins as a result of the inclusiontemporary manufacturing underutilization during product ramp. Additionally, there were lower gross margins in our solar cash and loan business from reduced average selling prices as a result of SolarCity’s financial results from the acquisition date of November 21, 2016 to December 31, 2016. The remaining increase was due to increase in the sale of energy storage productsour low cost solar strategy, partially offset by lower materials and increased expenditures to increase the capacity of energy storage products.manufacturing costs.

Research and Development Expense

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Change 2017 vs. 2016

 

 

Change 2016 vs. 2015

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020 vs. 2019 Change

 

 

2019 vs. 2018 Change

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Research and development

 

$

1,378,073

 

 

$

834,408

 

 

$

717,900

 

 

$

543,665

 

 

 

65

%

 

$

116,508

 

 

 

16

%

 

$

1,491

 

 

$

1,343

 

 

$

1,460

 

 

$

148

 

 

 

11

%

 

$

(117

)

 

 

-8

%

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

12

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

5

%

 

 

7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development (“R&D”) expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for our teams in engineering and research, manufacturing engineering and manufacturing test organizations, prototyping expense, contract and professional services and amortized equipment expense.


R&D expenses increased $543.7$148 million, or 65%11%, duringin the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This2019. The increase was primarily due to a $274.9$62 million increase in expensed materials as we continue to expand our product roadmap, $61 million increase in stock-based compensation expense primarily related to the issuance of equity awards in fiscal year 2020 at higher grant date fair values due to our increased share price, $20 million increase in facilities, freight and depreciation expenses and a $20 million increase in employee and labor related expenses.

R&D expenses from increased headcount as a resultpercentage of our acquisitions as well as headcount growthrevenue decreased from the expansion of our automotive and energy generation and storage businesses, and a $44.3 million increase5.5% to 4.7% in stock-based compensation expense related to an increase in headcount and number of employee stock awards granted for new hire and refresher employee stock grants. Additionally, there were increases in facilities expenses, depreciation expenses, professional and outside service expenses and expensed materials to support the development of future products.

R&D expenses increased $116.5 million, or 16%, to $834.4 million during the year ended December 31, 20162020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2019. The increase of $116.5 million wasdecrease is primarily due to a $78.2 million increase in employee and labor related expenses due to a 15% headcount increase as we expanded our vehicle business in the U.S. and internationally, and a $65.0 million increase in stock-based compensation expense related to an increase in headcount and number of employee stock awards granted for new hire and refresher employee stock grants. This istotal revenues from expanding sales, partially offset by a $25.9 million decreasean increase in expensed materials related to our Model X development, which was primarily incurred in 2015. The overall increase also includes $11.0 million related to SolarCity.  R&D expenses as detailed above.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Change 2017 vs. 2016

 

 

Change 2016 vs. 2015

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Selling, general and

   administrative

 

$

2,476,500

 

 

$

1,432,189

 

 

$

922,232

 

 

$

1,044,311

 

 

 

73

%

 

$

509,957

 

 

 

55

%

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

21

%

 

 

20

%

 

 

23

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020 vs. 2019 Change

 

 

2019 vs. 2018 Change

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

3,145

 

 

$

2,646

 

 

$

2,835

 

 

$

499

 

 

 

19

%

 

$

(189

)

 

 

-7

%

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

10

%

 

 

11

%

 

 

13

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses generally consist primarily of personnel and facilities costs related to our stores, marketing, sales, executive, finance, human resources, information technology and legal organizations, as well as fees for professional and contract services and litigation settlements.

SG&A expenses increased $1.04 billion, or 73%, during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily due to a $524.0 million increase in employee and labor related expenses from increased headcount as a result of our acquisitions as well as headcount growth from the expansion of our automotive and energy generation and storage businesses, and a $64.9 million increase in stock-based compensation expense related to an increase in headcount and number of employee stock awards granted for new hire and refresher employee stock grants. Additionally, the increase was due to a $310.6 million increase in office, information technology and facilities-related expenses to support the growth of our business as well as sales and marketing activities to handle our expanding market presence and a $140.6 million increase in professional and outside service expenses to support the growth of our business.

SG&A expenses increased $510.0$499 million, or 55%19%, to $1.43 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to a $247.2 million increase in employee and labor related expenses due to a 61% increase in headcount as we expanded our business in the U.S. and internationally, a $91.0 million increase in office, information technology and facilities-related costs to support the growth of our business as well as sales and marketing activities to handle our expanding market presence, and a $58.1 million increase in stock-based compensation expense related to increased number of employee stock awards granted for new hire and existing employees. The increase includes $74.3 million related to SolarCity.


Interest Expense

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Change 2017 vs. 2016

 

 

Change 2016 vs. 2015

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Interest expense

 

$

(471,259

)

 

$

(198,810

)

 

$

(118,851

)

 

$

(272,449

)

 

 

137

%

 

$

(79,959

)

 

 

67

%

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

4

%

 

 

3

%

 

 

3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $272.4 million, or 137%, from the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to the inclusion of the full-year of interest expense from SolarCity of $185.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, our average outstanding indebtedness has increased in the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the prior year mainly due to the Convertible Senior Notes due in 2022 and the Senior Notes due in 2025, both of which we issued during 2017.

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $80.0 million, or 67%, from the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 consisted2019. The increase is primarily due to an increase of $625 million in stock-based compensation expense, of which $542 million was attributable to the 2018 CEO Performance Award. We recorded stock-based compensation expense of $838 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 for the 2018 CEO Performance Award compared to $296 million in the prior year. Of the expense recorded in fiscal year 2020, $232 million was due to cumulative catch-up expense for the service provided from the grant date when three operational milestones under such award were considered probable of being met and the remaining unamortized expense of $357 million for the first four tranches were recognized upon vesting as the first four market capitalization milestones were achieved (see Note 14, Equity Incentive Plans, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The remaining stock-based compensation expense increase of $83 million attributable to other directors and employees is primarily related to the issuance of equity awards in fiscal year 2020 at higher grant date fair values due to our increased share price. The increase in stock-based compensation was partially offset by a $33.1decrease of $90 million in customer promotional costs, facilities-related expenses and sales and marketing activities. Additionally, there was a reduction to operating expenses for costs previously incurred in the amount of $43 million for the settlement in part of the securities litigation relating to the SolarCity acquisition (see Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies—Legal Proceedings—Securities Litigation Relating to the SolarCity Acquisition, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased from 11% to 10% in year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease is primarily from an increase in total revenues from expanding sales, partially offset by an increase in our SG&A expenses as detailed above.

Restructuring and other

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020 vs. 2019 Change

 

 

2019 vs. 2018 Change

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Restructuring and other

 

$

 

 

$

149

 

 

$

135

 

 

$

(149

)

 

-100%

 

 

$

14

 

 

10%

 

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

0

%

 

 

1

%

 

 

1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we carried out certain restructuring actions in order to reduce costs and improve efficiency.     There were no restructuring actions in the year ended December 31, 2020.

Interest Expense

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020 vs. 2019 Change

 

 

2019 vs. 2018 Change

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Interest expense

 

$

(748

)

 

$

(685

)

 

$

(663

)

 

$

(63

)

 

 

9

%

 

$

(22

)

 

 

3

%

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

2

%

 

 

3

%

 

 

3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Interest expense increased by $63 million, or 9%, in the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to $105 million of losses on extinguishment of debt in fiscal year 2020 from early conversions on our convertible senior notes, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense due to a decrease in our weighted average interest rate as compared to the prior year and an increase of $17 million in the amount of interest we capitalized from the consolidated statements of operations to property, plant and equipment on vehicles sales thatthe consolidated balance sheets. Increased capitalization results in lower interest expense. The amount of interest we account for as collateralized borrowing, a $28.5 million increasecapitalize is driven by our construction in interest expense on build-to-suit leasesprogress balance, which increased year-over-year due to our construction and a $22.0 million increase in interest expense associated with SolarCity’s indebtedness, financing obligations and capital lease obligations.expansion of multiple factories.

Other Income (Expense), Net

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Change 2017 vs. 2016

 

 

Change 2016 vs. 2015

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Other income (expense), net

 

$

(125,373

)

 

$

111,272

 

 

$

(41,652

)

 

$

(236,645

)

 

 

-213

%

 

$

152,924

 

 

 

-367

%

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

-1

%

 

 

2

%

 

 

-1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020 vs. 2019 Change

 

2019 vs. 2018 Change

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

$

 

 

%

 

Other (expense) income, net

 

$

(122

)

 

$

45

 

 

$

22

 

 

$

(167

)

 

Not meaningful

 

$

23

 

 

105%

 

As a percentage of revenues

 

 

0

%

 

 

0

%

 

 

0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other (expense) income, (expense), net, consists primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses related to our foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities.liabilities and changes in the fair values of our fixed-for-floating interest rate swaps. We expect our foreign exchange gains and losses will vary depending upon movements in the underlying exchange rates. Additionally, other

Other (expense) income, (expense), net, includes a gain from the acquisition of SolarCity forchanged unfavorably by $167 million  in the year ended December 31, 2016.

Other income (expense), net, decreased by $236.7 million, or 213%, during the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. 2019. The decreaseunfavorable change was primarily due to measurement period adjustments to the acquisition date fair value of SolarCity and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

Other income, net, increased by $152.9 millionrates such as we recognized a gain from the acquisitionU.S. dollar depreciating greater than 5% against the euro and the Chinese yuan in 2020 compared to an appreciation of SolarCity of $88.7 million2% and a loss on conversion of our 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due1% against the same currencies in 2018 of $7.2 million. The remainder of the change in other income (expense), net, was primarily result of fluctuations in gains (losses) from foreign currency exchange.prior year, respectively.

Provision for Income Taxes

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Change 2017 vs. 2016

 

 

Change 2016 vs. 2015

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020 vs. 2019 Change

 

 

2019 vs. 2018 Change

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Provision for income taxes

 

$

31,546

 

 

$

26,698

 

 

$

13,039

 

 

$

4,848

 

 

 

18

%

 

$

13,659

 

 

 

105

%

 

$

292

 

 

$

110

 

 

$

58

 

 

$

182

 

 

 

165

%

 

$

52

 

 

 

90

%

Effective tax rate

 

 

-1

%

 

 

-4

%

 

 

-1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

%

 

 

-17

%

 

 

-6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our provision for income taxes increased by $4.9$182 million, or 18%165%, forin the year ended December 31, 20172020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This2019. The increase was primarily due to the increasesubstantial increases in vehicle deliveriestaxable profits in our foreign jurisdictions year-over-year.

Our effective tax jurisdictions, partially offset by $10.5 million of future U.S. alternative minimum tax refunds as a result ofrate increased from -17% to 25% in the Tax Act, which previously had an associated valuation allowance.


Our provision for income taxes for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $26.7 million and $13.0 million, respectively. This increase was2020 as compared to the prior year, primarily due to the increase in taxablesubstantial pre-tax income in our international jurisdictions.the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to a pre-tax loss for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020 vs. 2019 Change

 

 

2019 vs. 2018 Change

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests and

   redeemable noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

$

141

 

 

$

87

 

 

$

(87

)

 

$

54

 

 

62%

 

 

$

174

 

 

Not meaningful

Our net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests was related to financing fund arrangements.

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests increased by $54 million, or 62%, in the year ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase was primarily due to lower activities from new financing fund arrangements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $3.37$19.38 billion of cash and cash equivalents. Balances held in foreign currencies had a U.S. dollar equivalent of $521.5 million$6.76 billion and consisted primarily of euros, Chinese yuan euros and Norwegian kroner. Canadian dollars.Our sources of cash are predominately


predominantly from our deliveries of vehicles, sales and installations of our energy storage products and solar energy systems, proceeds from debt facilities, proceeds from financing funds and proceeds from equity offerings.

Our sources of liquidity and cash flows enable us to fund ongoing operations, research and development projects investments in toolingfor new products and technologies including our announced proprietary battery cells, ongoing production and additional manufacturing equipment forramps at existing manufacturing facilities such as the production ramp of Model 3,Fremont Factory, Gigafactory Nevada, Gigafactory Shanghai and Gigafactory New York, the continued construction of Gigafactory 1Berlin and Gigafactory Texas, and the continued expansion of our retail stores,and service centers, mobile repair serviceslocations, body shops, Mobile Service fleet, Supercharger network and Supercharger network. energy product installation capabilities.

As discussed in and subject to the considerations referenced in Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Management Opportunities, Challenges and Risks and 2021 Outlook—Cash Flow and Capital Expenditure Trends in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we currently expect our capital expenditures to be $4.50 to $6.00 billion in 2021 and in each of the next two fiscal years.

We are growingexpect that the cash we generate from our vehicle manufacturing capacity primarilycore operations will generally be sufficient to fulfill Model 3cover our future capital expenditures and to pay down our near-term debt obligations, although we may choose to seek alternative financing sources. For example, our local subsidiary has entered into credit facilities to support construction and production at 5,000 vehicles per week and,Gigafactory Shanghai. See Note 12, Debt, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in a later phase, to 10,000 vehicles per week. Capital expenditures in 2018 are projected to be slightly more than 2017. Wethis Annual Report on Form 10-K. As always, we continually evaluate our capital expenditure needs and may decide it is best to raise additional capital to fund the rapid growth of our business.business.

In January 2021, we updated our investment policy to provide us with more flexibility to further diversify and maximize returns on our cash that is not required to maintain adequate operating liquidity. As part of the policy, we may invest a portion of such cash in certain specified alternative reserve assets. Thereafter, we invested an aggregate $1.50 billion in bitcoin under this policy. Moreover, we expect to begin accepting bitcoin as a form of payment for our products in the near future, subject to applicable laws and initially on a limited basis, which we may or may not liquidate upon receipt. We believe our bitcoin holdings are highly liquid. However, digital assets may be subject to volatile market prices, which may be unfavorable at the time when we want or need to liquidate them.

We have an agreement to spend or incur $5.00$5.0 billion in combined capital, operational expenses, costs of goods sold and other costs in the State of New York during the 10-year period following full production at Gigafactory 2. We anticipate meeting these obligationsbeginning April 30, 2018, which we expect to meet through our operations. As we temporarily suspended most of our manufacturing operations at Gigafactory 2 and other operations within the State of New York andpursuant to a New York State executive order issued in March 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we do not believe that we facewere granted a significant riskone-year deferral of default.our obligation to be compliant as of April 30, 2020 with our applicable targets under such agreement.

We expect that our current sources of liquidity together with our projection of cash flows from operating activities will provide us with adequate liquidity over at least the next 12 months.months, even considering the expected levels of capital expenditures in the current and next two fiscal years. A large portion of our future expenditures is to fund our growth, and we can adjust our capital and operating expenditures by operating segment, including future expansion of our product offerings, stores,retail and service centers, delivery centerslocations, body shops, Mobile Service fleet, and Supercharger network. For example, if our near-term manufacturing operations decrease in scale or ramp more slowly than expected, including due to global economic conditions and levels of consumer outlook and spend impacting demand in the worldwide transportation, automotive and energy product industries, we may choose to correspondingly slow the pace of our capital expenditures. We may need or want to raise additional funds in the future, and these funds may not be available to us when we need or want them, or at all. If we cannot raise additional funds when we need or want them, our operations and prospects could be negatively affected.

In addition, we had $2.04$2.63 billion of unused committed amounts under our credit facilities and financing funds as of December 31, 2020, some of which are subject to satisfying specified conditions prior to draw-down.draw-down (such as pledging to our lenders sufficient amounts of qualified receivables, inventories, leased vehicles and our interests in those leases, solar energy systems and the associated customer contracts, our interests in financing funds or various other assets; and contributing or selling qualified solar energy systems and the associated customer contracts or qualified leased vehicles and our interests in those leases into the financing funds). For details regarding our indebtedness and financing funds, refer to Note 13, Convertible and Long-Term 12, Debt Obligations, and Note 18, VIE17, Variable Interest Entity Arrangements, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Summary of Cash Flows

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

5,943

 

 

$

2,405

 

 

$

2,098

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

$

(3,132

)

 

$

(1,436

)

 

$

(2,337

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

$

9,973

 

 

$

1,529

 

 

$

574

 


 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(60,654

)

 

$

(123,829

)

 

$

(524,499

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

$

(4,418,967

)

 

$

(1,416,430

)

 

$

(1,673,551

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

$

4,414,864

 

 

$

3,743,976

 

 

$

1,523,523

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our cash flows from operating activities are significantly affected by our cash investments to support the growth of our business in areas such as research and development and selling, general and administrative.administrative and working capital, especially inventory, which includes vehicles in transit. Our operating cash inflows include cash from vehicle sales, customer lease payments, directly from customers, customer deposits, cash from sales of regulatory credits and energy generation and storage products. These cash inflows are offset by our


payments to suppliers for production materials and parts used in our manufacturing process, employee compensation,operating expenses, operating lease payments and interest payments on our financings.

Net cash used inprovided by operating activities increased by $3.54 billion to $5.94 billion during the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased by $63.2 million as compared to2020 from $2.40 billion during the year ended December 31, 20162019. This increase was primarily due to the increase in net income excluding non-cash expenses and gains of $2.82 billion, the decrease in net operating assets and liabilities of $197.3$533 million partially offset byand $188 million of the decreaserepayment of our 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due in net loss, excluding non-cash expenses and gains,2019 during the three months ended March 31, 2019 (which represents the portion of $134.1 million.the repayment that was classified as an operating activity, as this represented an interest payment on the deeply-discounted convertible senior notes). The decrease in working capitalour net operating assets and liabilities was mainly driven by faster processing of payments for our vehicles and our focus on reducing inventory in the fourth quarter of 2017.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, cash used in operating activities was primarily a result of our net loss of $773.0 million, thelarger increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $750.6 million as our business expanded, the increase in resale value guarantees of $326.9 million and deferred revenue of $383.0 million as the number of vehicles with a resale value guarantee increased and the increase in customer deposits of $388.4 million primarily due to Model 3 reservations. These increases were partially offset by the increase in inventories and operating lease vehicles of $2.47 billion as we expanded our program for direct leases and vehicles with a resale value guarantee.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, cash used2020 as compared to the prior year from ramp up in operating activities was primarily a result ofproduction at the Fremont Factory and Gigafactory Shanghai. The decrease in our net loss of $888.7 millionoperating assets and theliabilities was partially offset by a smaller increase in inventories anddeferred revenue primarily due to delivery of regulatory credits in 2020 under a previous arrangement where we had received payment in advance as of December 31, 2019, a larger increase in operating lease vehicles as Model 3 direct leasing was introduced in the second quarter of $1.57 billion as we expanded our program for2019 and Model Y direct leasesleasing was introduced in the third quarter of 2020, and vehicles with a resale value guarantee. These increases were partially offset by thelarger increase in resale value guaranteesaccounts receivables of $442.3 million and deferred revenue of $322.2 million as the number vehicles with a resale value guarantee increased.government rebates already passed through to customers.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash flows from investing activities and their variability across each period related primarily to capital expenditures, which were $4.08$3.16 billion during 2017, $1.44 billion during 2016 and $1.63 billion during 2015. Capital expenditures during 2017 were from $3.41 billion of purchases of property and equipment (mainlyfor the year ended December 31, 2020, mainly for Model 3 production)Y production expansion at the Fremont Factory, expansion of Gigafactory Shanghai and $666.5 millionconstruction of Gigafactory Berlin and Gigafactory Texas, and $1.33 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019, mainly for Gigafactory Shanghai construction, Model 3 production ramp and Model Y preparations. The increase in capital expenditures was partially offset by decreases of $32 million in business combinations, net of cash acquired, and $30 million of design, acquisition and installation of solar energy systems under operating leaseswhen compared to the prior year. Additionally, we received $123 million and $46 million, respectively, of government grants in connection with customers. We also paid $114.5 million, net ofus making certain manufacturing equipment investments at Gigafactory Shanghai for the cash acquired, for acquisitions in 2017.

In 2014, we began construction of Gigafactory 1. During 2017, we used cash of $1.45 billion towards Gigafactory 1 construction.years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash flows from financing activities during the year ended December 31, 20172020 consisted primarily of $966.4 million from the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes due in 2022, $1.77$12.27 billion from the issuance of the Senior Notes due in 2025 and $400.2 million from our March 2017 public offering of common stock in public offerings in 2020, net of underwriter fees. However, we paid $151.2 million for the purchase of bond hedges net of the amount we received from the sale of warrants. Furthermore, we received $511.3issuance costs, and $417 million of net proceeds from exercise of stock options and other stock issuances. These cash inflows were partially offset by $1.99 billion of cash repayments upon early conversions of our convertible senior notes, $338 million principal repayments of our finance leases, collateralized lease borrowingsrepayments of $240 million and $527.5$219 million of net proceeds frompayments to financing fund investors. See Note 12, Debt, and Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details regarding our debt obligations and collateralized borrowings, respectively.

Cash flows from financing activities during the year ended December 31, 20162019 consisted primarily of $1.70$1.82 billion from our May 2016 public offeringthe issuance of the 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2024 (“2024 Notes”), net of transaction costs, and $848 million from the issuance of common stock, net of underwriter fees, $995.4 million of proceeds from issuances of debt net of repayments and $769.7 million of net proceeds from collateralized lease borrowings. The net proceeds from issuances of debt consisted primarily of $834.0underwriting discounts, in registered public offerings, $736 million of net borrowings under our senior secured asset-based revolving credit agreement and $390.0loan agreements entered into by certain Chinese subsidiaries, $394 million of net borrowings underfor automotive asset-backed notes and $174 million from the vehicle lease-backed loan and security agreement entered intoissuance of warrants in 2016,connection with the offering of the 2024 Notes. These cash inflows were partially offset by settlementsa $732 million portion of $454.7 million for certain conversionsthe repayment of theour 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018. Furthermore, we received $180.32019 that was classified as financing activity, a $566 million repayment of net proceeds from fund investors.

Cash flows from financing activities duringour 1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2019, a purchase of convertible note hedges of $476 million in connection with the year ended December 31, 2015 consisted primarily of $730.0 million from our August 2015 public offering of common stockthe 2024 Notes and $568.7 million of net proceeds from collateralized lease borrowings.

repayments of $389 million.


Contractual Obligations

We are party to contractual obligations involving commitments to make payments to third parties, including certain debt financing arrangements and leases, primarily for stores, service centers, certain manufacturing facilities and certain corporate offices. These also include, as part of our normal business practices, contracts with suppliers for purchases of certain raw materials, components and services to facilitate adequate supply of these materials and services and capacity reservation contracts. The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2017,2020, certain significant obligations that will affect our future liquidity (in thousands)millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Total

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

Thereafter

 

Operating lease obligations

 

$

1,317,226

 

 

$

224,630

 

 

$

204,335

 

 

$

175,612

 

 

$

156,552

 

 

$

130,802

 

 

$

425,295

 

Capital lease obligations,

   including interest

 

 

785,215

 

 

 

127,180

 

 

 

137,313

 

 

 

167,281

 

 

 

138,042

 

 

 

133,772

 

 

 

81,627

 

Purchase obligations (1)

 

 

17,525,445

 

 

 

2,761,819

 

 

 

2,279,682

 

 

 

3,484,953

 

 

 

3,433,787

 

 

 

3,435,956

 

 

 

2,129,248

 

Long-term debt (2)

 

 

11,797,022

 

 

 

2,506,499

 

 

 

2,173,097

 

 

 

413,430

 

 

 

1,798,676

 

 

 

1,582,240

 

 

 

3,323,080

 

Total

 

$

31,424,908

 

 

$

5,620,128

 

 

$

4,794,427

 

 

$

4,241,276

 

 

$

5,527,057

 

 

$

5,282,770

 

 

$

5,959,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024

 

 

2025

 

 

Thereafter

 

Operating lease obligations,

   including imputed interest

 

$

1,846

 

 

$

366

 

 

$

327

 

 

$

279

 

 

$

245

 

 

$

204

 

 

$

425

 

Finance lease obligations,

   including imputed interest

 

 

1,635

 

 

 

462

 

 

 

446

 

 

 

412

 

 

 

299

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

7

 

Purchase obligations (1)

 

 

18,318

 

 

 

10,483

 

 

 

2,743

 

 

 

2,280

 

 

 

1,877

 

 

 

865

 

 

 

70

 

Debt, including scheduled

   interest (2)

 

 

11,695

 

 

 

2,100

 

 

 

2,172

 

 

 

2,602

 

 

 

2,021

 

 

 

2,109

 

 

 

691

 

Total

 

$

33,494

 

 

$

13,411

 

 

$

5,688

 

 

$

5,573

 

 

$

4,442

 

 

$

3,187

 

 

$

1,193

 

 

(1)

These amounts represent (i) purchase orders of $1.18$5.95 billion issued under binding and enforceable agreements with all vendors as of December 31, 20172020 and (ii) $16.34$12.37 billion in other estimable purchase obligations pursuant to such agreements, primarily relating to the purchase of lithium-ion cells to be produced by Panasonic at Gigafactory 1,Nevada, including any additional amounts we may have to pay vendors if we do not meet certain minimum purchase obligations. In cases where no purchase orders were outstanding under binding and enforceable agreements as of December 31, 2017,2020, we have included estimated amounts based on our best estimates and assumptions or discussions with the relevant vendors as of such date or, where applicable, on amounts or assumptions included in such agreements for purposes of discussion or reference. In certain cases, such estimated amounts were subject to contingent events. Furthermore, these amounts do not include future payments for purchase obligations that were recorded in accounts payable or accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2017.2020.

(2)

Long-termThis includes non-recourse debt includes our non-recourse indebtednessrepayments, including scheduled interest, of $ 2.93$5.16 billion. Non-recourse debt refers to debt that is recourse to only specified assets of our subsidiaries. Short-term scheduled interest payments and amortization of convertible senior note conversion features, debt discounts and deferred financing costs for the year ended December 31, 2020 is $342 million. Long-term scheduled interest payments and amortization of convertible senior note conversion features, debt discounts and deferred financing costs for the years thereafter is $1.13 billion.

The table above excludes unrecognized tax benefits of $191.0$353 million because if recognized, they would be an adjustment to our deferred tax assets.

We offer resale value guarantees or similar buyback terms to certain customers who purchase and finance their vehicles through one of our specified commercial banking partners and certain leasing partners (refer to Automotive Sales with Resale Value Guarantee or a Buyback Option in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The maximum amount we could be required to pay under these programs, should customers exercise their resale value guarantees or buyback options, would be $1.84 billion over the next five years, of which $394 million is within a 12-month period from December 31, 2020. We have not included this in the table above as it is unknown how many customers will exercise their options. Additionally, we plan to resell any vehicles which are returned to us and therefore, the actual exposure to us is deemed to be limited.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the periods presented, we did not have relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which were established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 


ITEM 7A.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency Risk

We transact business globally in multiple currencies. Ourcurrencies and hence have foreign operations expose uscurrency risks related to our revenue, costs of revenue, operating expenses and localized subsidiary debt denominated in currencies other than the riskU.S. dollar (primarily the Chinese yuan, euro, Canadian dollar and British pound in relation to our current year operations). In general, we are a net receiver of currencies other than the U.S. dollar for our foreign subsidiaries. Accordingly, changes in exchange rates affect our revenue and other operating results as expressed in U.S. dollars as we do not typically hedge foreign currency risk.

We have also experienced, and will continue to experience, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates against the functional currenciesour net income (loss) as a result of our foreign subsidiaries and against the U.S. dollar. Upon consolidation, as foreign currency exchange rates vary, revenues and expenses may be significantly impacted, and we may record significant gains or losses(losses) on the settlement and the re-measurement of our monetary assets and liabilities includingdenominated in currencies that are not the local currency (primarily consisting of our intercompany balances. As ofand cash and cash equivalents balances). For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we recognized a net foreign currency loss of $114 million in other (expense) income, net, with our largest re-measurement exposures from the U.S. dollar, euro and Canadian dollar as our subsidiaries’ monetary assets and liabilities are denominated in various local currencies. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized a net foreign currency gain of $48 million in other (expense) income, net, with our largest re-measurement exposures were from the euro,U.S. dollar, British pound and Canadian dollar and Norwegian krone..


We considered the historical trends in foreign currency exchange rates and determined that it is reasonably possible that adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates of 10% for all currencies could be experienced in the near-term. These reasonably possible adverse changes were applied to our total monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than our functionallocal currencies as of December 31, 2017at the balance sheet date to compute the adverse impact these changes would have had on our net income (loss) before income taxes. These changes would have resulted in a benefit of $8 million at December 31, 2020 and an adverse impact of $116.0 million.$362 million at December 31, 2019 assuming no foreign currency hedging.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk on our borrowings that bear interest at floating rates. Pursuant to our risk management policies, in certain cases, we utilize derivative instruments to manage some of this risk. We do not enter into derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. A hypothetical 10% change in our interest rates on our floating rate debt would have increased or decreased our interest expense for the yearyears ended December 31, 20172020 and 2019 by $7.6 million.

$4 million and $8 million, respectively.

 

 

 


ITEM 8.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The sections titled “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”, “Consolidated Balance Sheets”, “Consolidated Statements of Operations”, “Consolidated Statements of Equity”, “Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows” and “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SolarCity Corporation (File No. 001-35758) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2017, are hereby incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are filed as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

  

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

6151

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  

6354

Consolidated Statements of Operations

  

6455

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive LossIncome (Loss)

  

6556

Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity

  

6657

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  

6758

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  

6859

 



ReportReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To theBoard of Directors and Stockholders of Tesla, Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tesla, Inc. and its subsidiaries(the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, 2019,and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive loss,income (loss), of redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).We also have audited the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, based on our audits and, with respect to the December 31, 2016 balance sheet, the report of other auditors, the consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, based on our audit, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the COSO.

We did not auditChanges in Accounting Principles

As discussed in Note 2 to the pre-acquisition historical basis balance sheet of SolarCity Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary, as of December 31, 2016, which reflects total assets and total liabilities of $9.1 billion and $6.9 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2016.  The pre-acquisition historical basis balance sheet of SolarCity Corporation was audited by other auditors whose report thereon has been furnished to us, and our opinion on theconsolidated financial statements, expressed herein, insofar asthe Company changed the manner in which it relates toaccounts for leases in 2019 and the pre-acquisition historical basis amounts includedmanner in which it accounts for SolarCity Corporation as of December 31, 2016, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.  We audited the adjustments necessary to convert the December 31, 2016 pre-acquisition historical basis balance sheet of SolarCity Corporation to the basis reflectedrevenue from contracts with customers in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.2018.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits inin accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated beloware mattersarising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Automotive Sales To Customers With a Resale Value Guarantee or Buyback Option

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the sales return reserve related to resale value guarantees or buyback options was $703 million as of December 31, 2020, of which $202 million was short-term. The Company offers some customers resale value guarantees or buyback options. Under these programs, the Company receives full payment for the vehicle sales price at the time of delivery and the customer has the option of selling their vehicle back to the Company during the guarantee period for a pre-determined resale value. In circumstances where management does not believe the customer has a significant economic incentive to exercise the resale value guarantee or buyback option provided to them at contract inception, the Company recognizes revenue when control transfers upon delivery to a customer as a sale with a right of return. In circumstances where management believes the customer has a significant economic incentive to exercise the resale value guarantee or buyback option at contract inception, the Company recognizes the transaction as an operating lease. Management’s determination of whether there is a significant economic incentive includes comparing a vehicle’s estimated market value at the time the option is exercisable with the guaranteed resale value. Sales return reserves are estimated based on historical experience plus consideration for expected future market values. On a quarterly basis, management assesses the estimated future market values of vehicles under these programs, taking into account price adjustments on vehicle offerings and changes in market conditions subsequent to the initial sale to determine the need for changes to the reserve.  

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to automotive sales to customers with a resale value guarantee or buyback option is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management in determining the sales return reserve when customers do not have a significant economic incentive to exercise their option; this in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to the sales return reserve when customers do not have a significant economic incentive.  

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to automotive revenue recognition for sales to customers with a resale value guarantee or buyback option as well as the related sales return reserve, including controls over management’s estimate of expected future market values and historical experience. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for determining whether customers have a significant economic incentive to exercise their put rights under the resale value guarantee and buyback option programs and, if not, the related sales return reserve. This included evaluating the appropriateness of the model applied and the reasonableness of significant assumptions related to historical experience and the estimated expected future market values used in the comparison to guaranteed resale amounts. Evaluating assumptions related to historical experience and estimated expected future market values involved evaluating whether the assumptions used were reasonable considering current and past performance and consistency with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Procedures were performed to evaluate the reliability, completeness and relevance of management’s data used in the development of the historical experience assumption.

Automotive Warranty Reserve

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, total accrued warranty, which primarily relates to the automotive segment, was $1,468 million as of December 31, 2020. The Company provides a manufacturer’s warranty on all new and used Tesla vehicles. As described in Note 2, a warranty reserve is accrued for these products sold, which includes management’s best estimate of the projected costs to repair or replace items under warranty, including recalls when identified. These estimates are based on actual claims incurred to date and an estimate of the nature, frequency and costs of future claims.  


The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the automotive warranty reserve is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management in determining the warranty reserve; this in turn led to significant auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures to evaluate the estimate of the nature, frequency and costs of future claims, and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s estimate of the automotive warranty reserve, including controls over management’s estimate of the nature, frequency and costs of future claims as well as the completeness and accuracy of actual claims incurred to date. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for determining the automotive warranty reserve. This included evaluating the appropriateness of the model applied and the reasonableness of significant assumptions related to the nature and frequency of future claims and the related costs to repair or replace items under warranty. Evaluating the assumptions related to the nature and frequency of future claims and the related costs to repair or replace items under warranty involved evaluating whether the assumptions used were reasonable considering current and past performance, including a lookback analysis comparing prior period forecasted claims to actual claims incurred. These procedures also included developing an independent estimate of a portion of the warranty accrual, comparing the independent estimate to management’s estimate to evaluate the reasonableness of the estimate, and testing the completeness and accuracy of historical vehicle claims. Procedures were performed to test the reliability, completeness, and relevance of management’s data related to the historical claims processed and that such claims were appropriately used by management in the estimation of future claims. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the appropriateness of aspects of management’s model for estimating the nature and frequency of future claims, and testing management’s warranty reserve for a portion of future warranty claims.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

San Jose, California

February 22, 20188, 2021

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2005.

 

 

 

 


Tesla, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands,millions, except per share data)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

3,367,914

 

 

$

3,393,216

 

 

$

19,384

 

 

$

6,268

 

Restricted cash

 

 

155,323

 

 

 

105,519

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

515,381

 

 

 

499,142

 

 

 

1,886

 

 

 

1,324

 

Inventory

 

 

2,263,537

 

 

 

2,067,454

 

 

 

4,101

 

 

 

3,552

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

268,365

 

 

 

194,465

 

 

 

1,346

 

 

 

959

 

Total current assets

 

 

6,570,520

 

 

 

6,259,796

 

 

 

26,717

 

 

 

12,103

 

Operating lease vehicles, net

 

 

4,116,604

 

 

 

3,134,080

 

 

 

3,091

 

 

 

2,447

 

Solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net

 

 

6,347,490

 

 

 

5,919,880

 

Solar energy systems, net

 

 

5,979

 

 

 

6,138

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

10,027,522

 

 

 

5,982,957

 

 

 

12,747

 

 

 

10,396

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

1,558

 

 

 

1,218

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

361,502

 

 

 

376,145

 

 

 

313

 

 

 

339

 

Goodwill

 

 

60,237

 

 

 

 

 

 

207

 

 

 

198

 

MyPower customer notes receivable, net of current portion

 

 

456,652

 

 

 

506,302

 

Restricted cash, net of current portion

 

 

441,722

 

 

 

268,165

 

Other assets

 

 

273,123

 

 

 

216,751

 

Other non-current assets

 

 

1,536

 

 

 

1,470

 

Total assets

 

$

28,655,372

 

 

$

22,664,076

 

 

$

52,148

 

 

$

34,309

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

2,390,250

 

 

$

1,860,341

 

 

$

6,051

 

 

$

3,771

 

Accrued liabilities and other

 

 

1,731,366

 

 

 

1,210,028

 

 

 

3,855

 

 

 

3,222

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

1,015,253

 

 

 

763,126

 

 

 

1,458

 

 

 

1,163

 

Resale value guarantees

 

 

787,333

 

 

 

179,504

 

Customer deposits

 

 

853,919

 

 

 

663,859

 

 

 

752

 

 

 

726

 

Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases

 

 

796,549

 

 

 

984,211

 

Current portion of solar bonds and promissory notes issued to related parties

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

165,936

 

Current portion of debt and finance leases

 

 

2,132

 

 

 

1,785

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

7,674,670

 

 

 

5,827,005

 

 

 

14,248

 

 

 

10,667

 

Long-term debt and capital leases, net of current portion

 

 

9,415,700

 

 

 

5,860,049

 

Solar bonds issued to related parties, net of current portion

 

 

100

 

 

 

99,164

 

Convertible senior notes issued to related parties

 

 

2,519

 

 

 

10,287

 

Debt and finance leases, net of current portion

 

 

9,556

 

 

 

11,634

 

Deferred revenue, net of current portion

 

 

1,177,799

 

 

 

851,790

 

 

 

1,284

 

 

 

1,207

 

Resale value guarantees, net of current portion

 

 

2,309,222

 

 

 

2,210,423

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

2,442,970

 

 

 

1,891,449

 

 

 

3,330

 

 

 

2,691

 

Total liabilities

 

 

23,022,980

 

 

 

16,750,167

 

 

 

28,418

 

 

 

26,199

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

397,734

 

 

 

367,039

 

 

 

604

 

 

 

643

 

Convertible senior notes (Note 13)

 

 

70

 

 

 

8,784

 

Convertible senior notes (Note 12)

 

 

51

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized;

no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock; $0.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; 168,797 and 161,561

shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,

respectively

 

 

169

 

 

 

161

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

9,178,024

 

 

 

7,773,727

 

Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)

 

 

33,348

 

 

 

(23,740

)

Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 100 shares authorized;

0 shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock; $0.001 par value; 2,000 shares authorized; 960 and

905 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and December 31,

2019, respectively (1)

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Additional paid-in capital (1)

 

 

27,260

 

 

 

12,736

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

363

 

 

 

(36

)

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(4,974,299

)

 

 

(2,997,237

)

 

 

(5,399

)

 

 

(6,083

)

Total stockholders' equity

 

 

4,237,242

 

 

 

4,752,911

 

 

 

22,225

 

 

 

6,618

 

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

997,346

 

 

 

785,175

 

 

 

850

 

 

 

849

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

28,655,372

 

 

$

22,664,076

 

 

$

52,148

 

 

$

34,309

 

(1)

Prior period results have been adjusted to reflect the 5-for-one stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend in August 2020. See Note 1, Overview, for details.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Tesla, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in millions, except per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Automotive sales

 

$

26,184

 

 

$

19,952

 

 

$

17,632

 

Automotive leasing

 

 

1,052

 

 

 

869

 

 

 

883

 

Total automotive revenues

 

 

27,236

 

 

 

20,821

 

 

 

18,515

 

Energy generation and storage

 

 

1,994

 

 

 

1,531

 

 

 

1,555

 

Services and other

 

 

2,306

 

 

 

2,226

 

 

 

1,391

 

Total revenues

 

 

31,536

 

 

 

24,578

 

 

 

21,461

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Automotive sales

 

 

19,696

 

 

 

15,939

 

 

 

13,686

 

Automotive leasing

 

 

563

 

 

 

459

 

 

 

488

 

Total automotive cost of revenues

 

 

20,259

 

 

 

16,398

 

 

 

14,174

 

Energy generation and storage

 

 

1,976

 

 

 

1,341

 

 

 

1,365

 

Services and other

 

 

2,671

 

 

 

2,770

 

 

 

1,880

 

Total cost of revenues

 

 

24,906

 

 

 

20,509

 

 

 

17,419

 

Gross profit

 

 

6,630

 

 

 

4,069

 

 

 

4,042

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

1,491

 

 

 

1,343

 

 

 

1,460

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

3,145

 

 

 

2,646

 

 

 

2,835

 

Restructuring and other

 

 

 

 

 

149

 

 

 

135

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

4,636

 

 

 

4,138

 

 

 

4,430

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

 

1,994

 

 

 

(69

)

 

 

(388

)

Interest income

 

 

30

 

 

 

44

 

 

 

24

 

Interest expense

 

 

(748

)

 

 

(685

)

 

 

(663

)

Other (expense) income, net

 

 

(122

)

 

 

45

 

 

 

22

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

1,154

 

 

 

(665

)

 

 

(1,005

)

Provision for income taxes

 

 

292

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

58

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

862

 

 

 

(775

)

 

 

(1,063

)

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests and

   redeemable noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

141

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

(87

)

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 

$

721

 

 

$

(862

)

 

$

(976

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less: Buy-out of noncontrolling interest

 

 

31

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) used in computing net

   income (loss) per share of common stock

 

$

690

 

 

$

(870

)

 

$

(976

)

Net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable

   to common stockholders (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.74

 

 

$

(0.98

)

 

$

(1.14

)

Diluted

 

$

0.64

 

 

$

(0.98

)

 

$

(1.14

)

Weighted average shares used in computing net

   income (loss) per share of common stock (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

933

 

 

 

887

 

 

 

853

 

Diluted

 

 

1,083

 

 

 

887

 

 

 

853

 

(1)

Prior period results have been adjusted to reflect the 5-for-one stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend in August 2020. See Note 1, Overview, for details.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Tesla, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in millions)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

862

 

 

$

(775

)

 

$

(1,063

)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

399

 

 

 

(28

)

 

 

(42

)

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

1,261

 

 

 

(803

)

 

 

(1,105

)

Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to

   noncontrolling interests and redeemable

   noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

141

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

(87

)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

 

$

1,120

 

 

$

(890

)

 

$

(1,018

)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 


Tesla, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of OperationsRedeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity

(in thousands,millions, except per share data)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Automotive sales

 

$

8,534,752

 

 

$

5,589,007

 

 

$

3,431,587

 

Automotive leasing

 

 

1,106,548

 

 

 

761,759

 

 

 

309,386

 

Total automotive revenues

 

 

9,641,300

 

 

 

6,350,766

 

 

 

3,740,973

 

Energy generation and storage

 

 

1,116,266

 

 

 

181,394

 

 

 

14,477

 

Services and other

 

 

1,001,185

 

 

 

467,972

 

 

 

290,575

 

Total revenues

 

 

11,758,751

 

 

 

7,000,132

 

 

 

4,046,025

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Automotive sales

 

 

6,724,480

 

 

 

4,268,087

 

 

 

2,639,926

 

Automotive leasing

 

 

708,224

 

 

 

481,994

 

 

 

183,376

 

Total automotive cost of revenues

 

 

7,432,704

 

 

 

4,750,081

 

 

 

2,823,302

 

Energy generation and storage

 

 

874,538

 

 

 

178,332

 

 

 

12,287

 

Services and other

 

 

1,229,022

 

 

 

472,462

 

 

 

286,933

 

Total cost of revenues

 

 

9,536,264

 

 

 

5,400,875

 

 

 

3,122,522

 

Gross profit

 

 

2,222,487

 

 

 

1,599,257

 

 

 

923,503

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

1,378,073

 

 

 

834,408

 

 

 

717,900

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

2,476,500

 

 

 

1,432,189

 

 

 

922,232

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

3,854,573

 

 

 

2,266,597

 

 

 

1,640,132

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(1,632,086

)

 

 

(667,340

)

 

 

(716,629

)

Interest income

 

 

19,686

 

 

 

8,530

 

 

 

1,508

 

Interest expense

 

 

(471,259

)

 

 

(198,810

)

 

 

(118,851

)

Other (expense) income, net

 

 

(125,373

)

 

 

111,272

 

 

 

(41,652

)

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(2,209,032

)

 

 

(746,348

)

 

 

(875,624

)

Provision for income taxes

 

 

31,546

 

 

 

26,698

 

 

 

13,039

 

Net loss

 

 

(2,240,578

)

 

 

(773,046

)

 

 

(888,663

)

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests and

   redeemable noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

(279,178

)

 

 

(98,132

)

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(1,961,400

)

 

$

(674,914

)

 

$

(888,663

)

Net loss per share of common stock attributable

   to common stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(11.83

)

 

$

(4.68

)

 

$

(6.93

)

Diluted

 

$

(11.83

)

 

$

(4.68

)

 

$

(6.93

)

Weighted average shares used in computing net loss

   per share of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

165,758

 

 

 

144,212

 

 

 

128,202

 

Diluted

 

 

165,758

 

 

 

144,212

 

 

 

128,202

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

 

Noncontrolling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Paid-In

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Stockholders'

 

 

Interests in

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Interests

 

 

 

Shares (1)

 

 

Amount (1)

 

 

Capital (1)

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

Equity

 

 

Subsidiaries

 

 

Equity

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

$

398

 

 

 

 

844

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

9,177

 

 

$

(4,974

)

 

$

33

 

 

$

4,237

 

 

$

997

 

 

$

5,234

 

Adjustments for prior periods from adopting ASC 606

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

623

 

 

 

 

 

 

623

 

 

 

(89

)

 

 

534

 

Adjustments for prior periods from adopting Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

Exercises of conversion feature of convertible senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

Issuance of common stock for equity incentive awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

296

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

296

 

 

 

 

 

 

296

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

775

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

775

 

 

 

 

 

 

775

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 

 

276

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

161

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 

(61

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(210

)

 

 

(210

)

Other

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

(62

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(976

)

 

 

 

 

 

(976

)

 

 

(25

)

 

 

(1,001

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(41

)

 

 

(41

)

 

 

 

 

 

(41

)

Balance as of December 31, 2018

 

$

556

 

 

 

 

863

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

10,248

 

 

$

(5,318

)

 

$

(8

)

 

$

4,923

 

 

$

834

 

 

$

5,757

 

Adjustments for prior periods from adopting ASC 842

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

 

 

 

97

 

Conversion feature of 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2024 ("2024 Notes")

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

491

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

491

 

 

 

 

 

 

491

 

Purchase of convertible note hedges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(476

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(476

)

 

 

 

 

 

(476

)

Sales of warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

 

 

 

174

 

Issuance of common stock for equity incentive awards and acquisitions, net of transaction costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

482

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

482

 

 

 

 

 

 

482

 

Issuance of common stock in May 2019 public offering at $48.60 per share (1), net of

   issuance costs of $15

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

848

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

848

 

 

 

 

 

 

848

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

973

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

973

 

 

 

 

 

 

973

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 

 

105

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

174

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 

(65

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(198

)

 

 

(198

)

Other

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

Net income (loss)

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(862

)

 

 

 

 

 

(862

)

 

 

39

 

 

 

(823

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(28

)

 

 

(28

)

 

 

 

 

 

(28

)

Balance as of December 31, 2019

 

$

643

 

 

 

 

905

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

12,736

 

 

$

(6,083

)

 

$

(36

)

 

$

6,618

 

 

$

849

 

 

$

7,467

 

Adjustments for prior periods from adopting ASU 2016-13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(37

)

 

 

 

 

 

(37

)

 

 

 

 

 

(37

)

Reclassification between equity and mezzanine equity for convertible senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(51

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(51

)

 

 

 

 

 

(51

)

Exercises of conversion feature of convertible senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

Issuance of common stock for equity incentive awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

417

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

417

 

 

 

 

 

 

417

 

Issuance of common stock in public offerings, net of

   issuance costs of $68 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

12,269

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,269

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,269

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,861

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,861

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,861

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

17

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 

(67

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(132

)

 

 

(132

)

Buy-outs of noncontrolling interests

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(31

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(31

)

 

 

 

 

 

(31

)

Net income

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

721

 

 

 

 

 

 

721

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

837

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

399

 

 

 

399

 

 

 

 

 

 

399

 

Balance as of December 31, 2020

 

$

604

 

 

 

 

960

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

27,260

 

 

$

(5,399

)

 

$

363

 

 

$

22,225

 

 

$

850

 

 

$

23,075

 

(1)

Prior period results have been adjusted to reflect the 5-for-one stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend in August 2020. See Note 1, Overview, for details regarding stock split and public offerings.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Tesla, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in millions)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

862

 

 

$

(775

)

 

$

(1,063

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation, amortization and impairment

 

 

2,322

 

 

 

2,154

 

 

 

1,901

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

1,734

 

 

 

898

 

 

 

749

 

Amortization of debt discounts and issuance costs

 

 

180

 

 

 

188

 

 

 

159

 

Inventory and purchase commitments write-downs

 

 

202

 

 

 

193

 

 

 

85

 

Loss on disposals of fixed assets

 

 

117

 

 

 

146

 

 

 

162

 

Foreign currency transaction net loss (gain)

 

 

114

 

 

 

(48

)

 

 

(2

)

Non-cash interest and other operating activities

 

 

228

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

49

 

Operating cash flow related to repayment of discounted convertible senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

(188

)

 

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of business combinations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(652

)

 

 

(367

)

 

 

(497

)

Inventory

 

 

(422

)

 

 

(429

)

 

 

(1,023

)

Operating lease vehicles

 

 

(1,072

)

 

 

(764

)

 

 

(215

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(251

)

 

 

(288

)

 

 

(82

)

Other non-current assets

 

 

(344

)

 

 

115

 

 

 

(207

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

2,102

 

 

 

646

 

 

 

1,797

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

321

 

 

 

801

 

 

 

406

 

Customer deposits

 

 

7

 

 

 

(58

)

 

 

(96

)

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

495

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(25

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

5,943

 

 

 

2,405

 

 

 

2,098

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment excluding finance leases, net of sales

 

 

(3,157

)

 

 

(1,327

)

 

 

(2,101

)

Purchases of solar energy systems, net of sales

 

 

(75

)

 

 

(105

)

 

 

(218

)

Receipt of government grants

 

 

123

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

 

Purchase of intangible assets

 

 

(10

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

 

Business combinations, net of cash acquired

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(45

)

 

 

(18

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(3,132

)

 

 

(1,436

)

 

 

(2,337

)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuances of common stock in public offerings, net of issuance costs

 

 

12,269

 

 

 

848

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuances of convertible and other debt

 

 

9,713

 

 

 

10,669

 

 

 

6,176

 

Repayments of convertible and other debt

 

 

(11,623

)

 

 

(9,161

)

 

 

(5,247

)

Repayments of borrowings issued to related parties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(100

)

Collateralized lease repayments

 

 

(240

)

 

 

(389

)

 

 

(559

)

Proceeds from exercises of stock options and other stock issuances

 

 

417

 

 

 

263

 

 

 

296

 

Principal payments on finance leases

 

 

(338

)

 

 

(321

)

 

 

(181

)

Debt issuance costs

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(37

)

 

 

(15

)

Purchase of convertible note hedges

 

 

 

 

 

(476

)

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of warrants

 

 

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from investments by noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

24

 

 

 

279

 

 

 

437

 

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

(208

)

 

 

(311

)

 

 

(227

)

Payments for buy-outs of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

(35

)

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(6

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

9,973

 

 

 

1,529

 

 

 

574

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

334

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

(23

)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

13,118

 

 

 

2,506

 

 

 

312

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period

 

 

6,783

 

 

 

4,277

 

 

 

3,965

 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period

 

$

19,901

 

 

$

6,783

 

 

$

4,277

 

Supplemental Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity issued in connection with business combination

 

$

 

 

$

207

 

 

$

 

Acquisitions of property and equipment included in liabilities

 

$

1,088

 

 

$

562

 

 

$

249

 

Estimated fair value of facilities under build-to-suit leases

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

94

 

Supplemental Disclosures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

444

 

 

$

455

 

 

$

381

 

Cash paid during the period for taxes, net of refunds

 

$

115

 

 

$

54

 

 

$

35

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 


Tesla, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(1,961,400

)

 

$

(674,914

)

 

$

(888,663

)

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in net unrealized gain

 

 

 

 

 

43,220

 

 

 

7,443

 

Less: Reclassification adjustment for net (gains)

   losses into net loss

 

 

(5,570

)

 

 

(44,904

)

 

 

22

 

Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives

 

 

(5,570

)

 

 

(1,684

)

 

 

7,465

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

62,658

 

 

 

(18,500

)

 

 

(10,999

)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

57,088

 

 

 

(20,184

)

 

 

(3,534

)

Comprehensive loss

 

$

(1,904,312

)

 

$

(695,098

)

 

$

(892,197

)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Tesla, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

 

Noncontrolling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Paid-In

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Stockholders'

 

 

Interests in

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Interests

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Loss

 

 

Equity

 

 

Subsidiaries

 

 

Equity

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014

 

$

 

 

 

125,688

 

 

$

126

 

 

$

2,345,266

 

 

$

(1,433,660

)

 

$

(22

)

 

$

911,710

 

 

$

 

 

$

911,710

 

Reclassification from mezzanine equity to equity for Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,910

 

Issuance of common stock in August 2015 public offering at $242.00 per share, net of

   issuance costs of $11,122

 

 

 

 

 

3,099

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

738,405

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

738,408

 

 

 

 

 

 

738,408

 

Common stock issued, net of shares withheld for employee taxes

 

 

 

 

 

2,638

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

106,533

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

106,535

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

106,535

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

208,338

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

208,338

 

 

 

 

 

 

208,338

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(888,663

)

 

 

 

 

 

(888,663

)

 

 

 

 

 

(888,663

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,534

)

 

 

(3,534

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,534

)

Balance as of December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

131,425

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

3,409,452

 

 

 

(2,322,323

)

 

 

(3,556

)

 

 

1,083,704

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,083,704

 

Reclassification from mezzanine equity to equity for Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,501

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,501

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,501

 

Exercises of conversion feature of Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,056

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,056

)

 

 

 

 

 

(15,056

)

Common stock issued, net of shares withheld for employee taxes

 

 

 

 

 

11,096

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

163,817

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

163,828

 

 

 

 

 

 

163,828

 

Issuance of common stock in May 2016 public offering at $215.00 per share, net of

   issuance costs of $14,595

 

 

 

 

 

7,915

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

1,687,139

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,687,147

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,687,147

 

Issuance of common stock upon acquisition of SolarCity and assumed awards

 

 

 

 

 

11,125

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

2,145,977

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,145,988

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,145,988

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

347,357

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

347,357

 

 

 

 

 

 

347,357

 

Assumption of capped calls

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,460

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,460

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,460

)

Assumption of noncontrolling interests through acquisition

 

 

315,943

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

750,574

 

 

 

750,574

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests through acquisition

 

 

100,996

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,531

 

 

 

100,531

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests through acquisition

 

 

(7,137

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,561

)

 

 

(10,561

)

Net loss

 

 

(42,763

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(674,914

)

 

 

 

 

 

(674,914

)

 

 

(55,369

)

 

 

(730,283

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20,184

)

 

 

(20,184

)

 

 

 

 

 

(20,184

)

Balance as of December 31, 2016

 

 

367,039

 

 

 

161,561

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

7,773,727

 

 

 

(2,997,237

)

 

 

(23,740

)

 

 

4,752,911

 

 

 

785,175

 

 

 

5,538,086

 

Adjustment of prior periods due to adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,662

 

 

 

(15,662

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion feature of Convertible Senior Notes due in 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

145,613

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

145,613

 

 

 

 

 

 

145,613

 

Purchases of bond hedges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(204,102

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(204,102

)

 

 

 

 

 

(204,102

)

Sales of warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,883

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,883

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,883

 

Reclassification from mezzanine equity to equity for Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,714

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,714

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,714

 

Exercises of conversion feature of Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018

 

 

 

 

 

1,408

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

230,151

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

230,153

 

 

 

 

 

 

230,153

 

Common stock issued, net of shares withheld for employee taxes

 

 

 

 

 

4,257

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

259,381

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

259,385

 

 

 

 

 

 

259,385

 

Issuance of common stock in March 2017 public offering at $262.00 per share, net of

   issuance costs of $2,854

 

 

 

 

 

1,536

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

399,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

399,647

 

 

 

 

 

 

399,647

 

Issuance of common stock upon acquisitions and assumed awards

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

10,528

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,528

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,528

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

485,822

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

485,822

 

 

 

 

 

 

485,822

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

 

 

192,421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

597,282

 

 

 

597,282

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

 

(100,703

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(163,626

)

 

 

(163,626

)

Buy-outs of noncontrolling interests

 

 

(2,921

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(409

)

 

 

(409

)

Net loss

 

 

(58,102

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,961,400

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,961,400

)

 

 

(221,076

)

 

 

(2,182,476

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,088

 

 

 

57,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,088

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

$

397,734

 

 

 

168,797

 

 

$

169

 

 

$

9,178,024

 

 

$

(4,974,299

)

 

$

33,348

 

 

$

4,237,242

 

 

$

997,346

 

 

$

5,234,588

 

sThe accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Tesla, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(2,240,578

)

 

$

(773,046

)

 

$

(888,663

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,636,003

 

 

 

947,099

 

 

 

422,590

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

466,760

 

 

 

334,225

 

 

 

197,999

 

Amortization of debt discounts and issuance costs

 

 

91,037

 

 

 

94,690

 

 

 

78,054

 

Inventory write-downs

 

 

131,665

 

 

 

65,520

 

 

 

44,940

 

Loss on disposals of fixed assets

 

 

105,770

 

 

 

34,633

 

 

 

37,723

 

Foreign currency transaction losses (gains)

 

 

52,309

 

 

 

(29,183

)

 

 

55,765

 

Loss (gain) related to SolarCity acquisition

 

 

57,746

 

 

 

(88,727

)

 

 

 

Non-cash interest and other operating activities

 

 

135,237

 

 

 

(15,179

)

 

 

20,382

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of business combinations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(24,635

)

 

 

(216,565

)

 

 

46,267

 

Inventories

 

 

(178,850

)

 

 

(632,867

)

 

 

(369,364

)

Operating lease vehicles

 

 

(1,522,573

)

 

 

(1,832,836

)

 

 

(1,204,496

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(72,084

)

 

 

56,806

 

 

 

(29,595

)

MyPower customer notes receivable and other assets

 

 

(15,453

)

 

 

(49,353

)

 

 

(24,362

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

388,206

 

 

 

750,640

 

 

 

263,345

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

468,902

 

 

 

382,962

 

 

 

322,203

 

Customer deposits

 

 

170,027

 

 

 

388,361

 

 

 

36,721

 

Resale value guarantee

 

 

208,718

 

 

 

326,934

 

 

 

442,295

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

81,139

 

 

 

132,057

 

 

 

23,697

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(60,654

)

 

 

(123,829

)

 

 

(524,499

)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment excluding capital leases, net of sales

 

 

(3,414,814

)

 

 

(1,280,802

)

 

 

(1,634,850

)

Maturities of short-term marketable securities

 

 

 

 

 

16,667

 

 

 

 

Purchases of solar energy systems, leased and to be leased

 

 

(666,540

)

 

 

(159,669

)

 

 

 

Increases in restricted cash

 

 

(223,090

)

 

 

(206,149

)

 

 

(26,441

)

Business combinations, net of cash acquired

 

 

(114,523

)

 

 

213,523

 

 

 

(12,260

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(4,418,967

)

 

 

(1,416,430

)

 

 

(1,673,551

)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuances of common stock in public offerings

 

 

400,175

 

 

 

1,701,734

 

 

 

730,000

 

Proceeds from issuances of convertible and other debt

 

 

7,138,055

 

 

 

2,852,964

 

 

 

318,972

 

Repayments of convertible and other debt

 

 

(3,995,484

)

 

 

(1,857,594

)

 

 

 

Repayments of borrowings under Solar Bonds issued to related parties

 

 

(165,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collateralized lease borrowings

 

 

511,321

 

 

 

769,709

 

 

 

568,745

 

Proceeds from exercises of stock options and other stock issuances

 

 

259,116

 

 

 

163,817

 

 

 

106,611

 

Principal payments on capital leases

 

 

(103,304

)

 

 

(46,889

)

 

 

(203,780

)

Common stock and debt issuance costs

 

 

(63,111

)

 

 

(20,042

)

 

 

(17,025

)

Purchases of convertible note hedges

 

 

(204,102

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from settlements of convertible note hedges

 

 

287,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuances of warrants

 

 

52,883

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock in private placement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,000

 

Payments for settlements of warrants

 

 

(230,385

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from investments by noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

789,704

 

 

 

201,527

 

 

 

 

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

(261,844

)

 

 

(21,250

)

 

 

 

Payments for buy-outs of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

(373

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

4,414,864

 

 

 

3,743,976

 

 

 

1,523,523

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

39,455

 

 

 

(7,409

)

 

 

(34,278

)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(25,302

)

 

 

2,196,308

 

 

 

(708,805

)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

3,393,216

 

 

 

1,196,908

 

 

 

1,905,713

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

3,367,914

 

 

$

3,393,216

 

 

$

1,196,908

 

Supplemental Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares issued in connection with business combinations and assumed vested awards

 

$

10,528

 

 

$

2,145,977

 

 

$

 

Acquisitions of property and equipment included in liabilities

 

$

914,108

 

 

$

663,771

 

 

$

267,334

 

Estimated fair value of facilities under build-to-suit leases

 

$

313,483

 

 

$

307,879

 

 

$

174,749

 

Supplemental Disclosures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

182,571

 

 

$

38,693

 

 

$

32,060

 

Cash paid during the period for taxes, net of refunds

 

$

65,695

 

 

$

16,385

 

 

$

9,461

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


Tesla, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 1 – Overview

Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on July 1, 2003. We design, develop, manufacture and sell high-performance fully electric vehicles and design, manufacture, install and sell solar energy generation and energy storage products. Our Chief Executive Officer, as the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), organizes the Company,our company, manages resource allocations and measures performance among two2 operating and reportable segments: (i) automotive and (ii) energy generation and storage.

As of and following December 31, 2020, there has continued to be widespread impact from the coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) pandemic. In 2020, we temporarily suspended operations at each of our manufacturing facilities worldwide for a part of the first half of the year. Some of our suppliers and partners also experienced temporary suspensions before resuming, including Panasonic, which manufactures battery cells for our products at our Gigafactory Nevada. We also instituted temporary employee furloughs and compensation reductions while our U.S. operations were scaled back. Finally, reduced operations or closures at motor vehicle departments, vehicle auction houses and municipal and utility company inspectors resulted in challenges in or postponements for our new vehicle deliveries, used vehicle sales, and energy product deployments. By the second half of 2020, however, we resumed operations at all of our manufacturing facilities and have continued to increase our output and add additional capacity and work with each of our suppliers and government agencies on meeting, ramping and sustaining our production. On the other hand, certain government regulations and shifting social behaviors have continued to limit or close non-essential transportation, government functions, business activities and person-to-person interactions. In some cases, the relaxation of such trends has recently been followed by actual or contemplated returns to stringent restrictions on gatherings or commerce. We cannot predict the duration or direction of such trends, which have also adversely affected and may in the future affect our operations.

On February 19, 2020, we completed a public offering of our common stock and issued a total of 15.2 million shares (as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split, as described in the paragraph below), for total cash proceeds of $2.31 billion, net of underwriting discounts and offering costs of $28 million.

On August 10, 2020, our Board of Directors declared a 5-for-one split of the Company’s common stock effected in the form of a stock dividend (the “Stock Split”). Each stockholder of record on August 21, 2020 received a dividend of four additional shares of common stock for each then-held share, distributed after close of trading on August 28, 2020. All share and per share amounts presented herein have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the impact of the Stock Split.

On September 1, 2020, we entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with certain sales agents to sell $5.00 billion in shares of our common stock from time to time through an “at-the-market” offering program. Such sales were completed by September 4, 2020 and settled by September 9, 2020, with the sale of 11,141,562 shares of common stock resulting in gross proceeds of $5.00 billion and net proceeds of $4.97 billion, net of sales agents’ commissions of $25 million and other offering costs of $1 million.

On December 8, 2020, we entered into a separate Equity Distribution Agreement with certain sales agents to sell $5.00 billion in shares of our common stock from time to time through an “at-the-market” offering program. Such sales were completed by December 9, 2020 and settled by December 11, 2020, with the sale of 7,915,589 shares of common stock resulting in gross proceeds of $5.00 billion and net proceeds of $4.99 billion, net of sales agents’ commissions of $13 million and other offering costs of $1 million.


Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Preparation

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and reflect our accounts and operations and those of our subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. In accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation,, we consolidate any variable interest entity (“VIE”) of which we are the primary beneficiary. We form VIEs with financing fund investors in the ordinary course of business in order to facilitate the funding and monetization of certain attributes associated with solar energy systems.systems and leases under our direct vehicle leasing programs. The typical condition for a controlling financial interest ownership is holding a majority of the voting interests of an entity; however, a controlling financial interest may also exist in entities, such as VIEs, through arrangements that do not involve controlling voting interests. ASC 810 requires a variable interest holder to consolidate a VIE if that party has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We do not consolidate a VIE in which we have a majority ownership interest when we are not considered the primary beneficiary. We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of a number ofall the VIEs (see Note 18, VIE17, Variable Interest Entity Arrangements). We evaluate our relationships with all the VIEs on an ongoing basis to ensure that we continue to be the primary beneficiary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures in the accompanying notes.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been uncertainty and disruption in the global economy and financial markets. The estimates used for, but not limited to, determining significant economic incentive for resale value guarantee arrangements, sales return reserves, the collectability of accounts receivable, inventory valuation, fair value of long-lived assets, goodwill, fair value of financial instruments, fair value and residual value of operating lease vehicles and solar energy systems subject to leases could be impacted. We have assessed the impact and are not aware of any specific events or circumstances that required an update to our estimates and assumptions or materially affected the carrying value of our assets or liabilities as of the date of issuance of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These estimates may change as new events occur and additional information is obtained. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Restricted cash and MyPower customer notes receivable have been reclassified to other assets and resale value guarantees has been reclassified to other liabilities.

UseRevenue Recognition

Adoption of EstimatesASC 606 revenue standard

On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the modified retrospective method.


Revenue by source

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosures in the accompanying notes. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, determining the selling price of products and services in multiple elementfollowing table disaggregates our revenue arrangements and determining the amortization period of these elements, the collectability of accounts receivable, inventory valuation, fair value of long-lived assets, fair value of financial instruments, residual value of operating lease vehicles, depreciable lives of property and equipment and solar energy systems, fair value and residual value of solar energy systems subject to leases, warranty liabilities, income taxes, contingencies, the accrued liability for solar energy system performance guarantees, determining lease pass-through financing obligations, the discount rates used to determine the fair value of investment tax credits, the valuation of build-to-suit lease assets, fair value of interest rate swaps and inputs used to value stock-based compensation. In addition, estimates and assumptions are used for the accounting for business combinations, including the fair values and useful lives of acquired assets, assumed liabilities and noncontrolling interests. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.by major source (in millions):

 


 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Automotive sales without resale value guarantee

 

$

24,053

 

 

$

19,212

 

 

$

15,810

 

Automotive sales with resale value guarantee (1)

 

 

551

 

 

 

146

 

 

 

1,403

 

Automotive regulatory credits

 

 

1,580

 

 

 

594

 

 

 

419

 

Energy generation and storage sales

 

 

1,477

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

1,056

 

Services and other

 

 

2,306

 

 

 

2,226

 

 

 

1,391

 

Total revenues from sales and services

 

 

29,967

 

 

 

23,178

 

 

 

20,079

 

Automotive leasing

 

 

1,052

 

 

 

869

 

 

 

883

 

Energy generation and storage leasing

 

 

517

 

 

 

531

 

 

 

499

 

Total revenues

 

$

31,536

 

 

$

24,578

 

 

$

21,461

 

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(1)

Due to pricing adjustments we made to our vehicle offerings during 2020 and 2019, we estimated that there was a greater likelihood that customers would exercise their buyback options and adjusted our sales return reserve on vehicles previously sold under our buyback options program, which resulted in a reduction of automotive sales with resale value guarantee. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, price adjustments resulted in a reduction of automotive sales with resale value guarantee by $72 million and $555 million, respectively. The amounts presented represent automotive sales with resale value guarantee net of such pricing adjustments’ impact.

Revenue RecognitionAutomotive Segment

We recognize revenue for products and services when: (i) a persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred and there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; (iii) pricing or fees are fixed or determinable and (iv) collection is reasonably assured.Automotive Sales Revenue

Automotive Sales without Resale Value Guarantee

Automotive Revenue

Automotivesales revenue includes revenues related to deliveries of new vehicles sales of regulatory credits to other automotive manufacturersand pay-per-use charges, and specific other elementsfeatures and services that meet the definition of a deliverableperformance obligation under multiple-element accounting guidance,ASC 606, including free internet connectivity, free access to our Supercharger network, internet connectivity, Full Self-Driving (“FSD”) features and future free over-the-air software updates. These other elementsWe recognize revenue on automotive sales upon delivery to the customer, which is when the control of a vehicle transfers. Payments are valuedtypically received at the point control transfers or in accordance with payment terms customary to the business. Other features and services such as access to our Supercharger network, internet connectivity and over-the-air software updates are provisioned upon control transfer of a vehicle and recognized over time on a stand-alonestraight-line basis as we have a stand-ready obligation to deliver such services to the customer. We recognize revenue related to these other features and we recognize their revenueservices over ourthe performance period, which is generally the expected ownership life of the vehicle or the eight-year life of the vehicle, except for internet connectivity, whichvehicle. Revenue related to FSD features is overrecognized when functionality is delivered to the free four-year period. Ifcustomer. For our obligations related to automotive sales, we sell a deliverable separately, we use that pricing to determine its fair value; otherwise, we use our best estimatedestimate standalone selling price by considering costs used to develop and deliver the service, third-party pricing of similar options and other information that may be available.

At the time of revenue recognition, we reduce the transaction price and record a sales return reserve against revenue for estimated variable consideration related to future product returns. Such return rate estimates are based on historical experience and are immaterial in all periods presented. In addition, any fees that are paid or payable by us to a customer’s lender when we arrange the financing would beare recognized as an offset against automotive sales revenue, in accordance with ASC 605-50, Customer Payments and Incentives.revenue.

AsCosts to obtain a contract mainly relate to commissions paid to our sales personnel for the sale of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had deferred $498.9 million and $291.2 million, respectively, related to the purchase of vehicle maintenance and service plans,vehicles. Commissions are not paid on other obligations such as access to our Supercharger network, internet connectivity, autopilotFSD features and over-the-air software updates.

Automotive Leasing Revenue

Automotive leasing revenue includes revenue recognized under lease accounting guidance for As our direct leasing programscontract costs related to automotive sales are typically fulfilled within one year, the costs to obtain a contract are expensed as well as programs with resale value guarantees. See “Vehicle salesincurred. Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling are classified as automotive sales revenue, and we have elected to recognize the cost for freight and shipping when control over vehicles, parts, or accessories have transferred to the customer as an expense in cost of automotive sales revenue. Our policy is to exclude taxes collected from a customer from the transaction price of automotive contracts.


Automotive Sales with a resale value guarantee,” “Vehicle sales to leasing partners with a resale value guarantee” and “Direct Vehicle Leasing Program” for further details.

Resale Value Guarantees and Other Financing ProgramsGuarantee or a Buyback Option

Vehicle sales to customers with a resale value guarantee

Prior to June 30, 2016, we offeredWe offer resale value guarantees or similar buy-back terms to allcertain international customers who purchasedpurchase vehicles and who financedfinance their vehicles through one of our specified commercial banking partners. Since June 30, 2016, this program is available onlyWe also offer resale value guarantees in connection with automotive sales to certain international markets.leasing partners. Under this program, customers havethese programs, we receive full payment for the vehicle sales price at the time of delivery and our counterparty has the option of selling their vehicle back to us during the guarantee period, which currently is generally at the end of the term of the applicable loan or financing program, for a determinedpre-determined resale value. Although

With the exception of the Vehicle Sales to Leasing Partners with a Resale Value Guarantee and a Buyback Option program discussed within the Automotive Leasing section below, we receive full payment forrecognize revenue when control transfers upon delivery to customers in accordance with ASC 606 as a sale with a right of return as we do not believe the vehicle sales pricecustomer has a significant economic incentive to exercise the resale value guarantee provided to them at contract inception. The process to determine whether there is a significant economic incentive includes a comparison of a vehicle’s estimated market value at the time the option is exercisable with the guaranteed resale value to determine the customer’s economic incentive to exercise. The performance obligations and the pattern of delivery,recognizing automotive sales with resale value guarantees are consistent with automotive sales without resale value guarantees with the exception of our estimate for sales return reserve. Sales return reserves for automotive sales with resale value guarantees are estimated based on historical experience plus consideration for expected future market values. On a quarterly basis, we assess the estimated market values of vehicles under our buyback options program to determine whether there have been changes to the likelihood of future product returns. As we accumulate more data related to the buyback values of our vehicles or as market conditions change, there may be material changes to their estimated values. Due to price adjustments we made to our vehicle offerings during 2020, we estimated that there is a greater likelihood that customers will exercise their buyback options that were provided prior to such adjustments. As a result, along with the estimated variable consideration related to normal future product returns for vehicles sold under the buyback options program, we adjusted our sales return reserve on vehicles previously sold under our buyback options program resulting in a reduction of automotive sales revenues of $72 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. If customers elect to exercise the buyback option, we expect to be able to subsequently resell the returned vehicles, which resulted in a corresponding reduction in cost of automotive sales of $42 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The net impact was $30 million reduction in gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2020. The total sales return reserve on vehicles previously sold under our buyback options program was $703 million and $639 million as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, of which $202 million and $93 million was short term, respectively.

Deferred revenue activity related to the access to our Supercharger network, internet connectivity, FSD features and over-the-air software updates on automotive sales with and without resale value guarantee consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Deferred revenue on automotive sales with and without

   resale value guarantee— beginning of period

 

$

1,472

 

 

$

883

 

Additions

 

 

724

 

 

 

880

 

Net changes in liability for pre-existing contracts

 

 

56

 

 

 

9

 

Revenue recognized

 

 

(326

)

 

 

(300

)

Deferred revenue on automotive sales with and without

   resale value guarantee— end of period

 

$

1,926

 

 

$

1,472

 

Deferred revenue is equivalent to the total transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied, or partially unsatisfied, as of December 31, 2020. From the deferred revenue balance as of December 31, 2019, revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020 was $283 million. From the deferred revenue balance as of December 31, 2018, revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019 was $220 million. Of the total deferred revenue on automotive sales with and without resale value guarantees as of December 31, 2020, we expect to recognize $1.13 billion of revenue in the next 12 months. The remaining balance will be recognized over the performance period as discussed above in Automotive Sales without Resale Value Guarantee.

Automotive Regulatory Credits

We earn tradable credits in the operation of our automotive business under various regulations related to zero-emission vehicles, greenhouse gas, fuel economy and clean fuel. We sell these credits to other regulated entities who can use the credits to comply with emission standards and other regulatory requirements.


Payments for automotive regulatory credits are typically received at the point control transfers to the customer, or in accordance with payment terms customary to the business. We recognize revenue on the sale of automotive regulatory credits at the time control of the regulatory credits is transferred to the purchasing party as automotive sales revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. Revenue from the sale of automotive regulatory credits totaled $1.58 billion, $594 million and $419 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Deferred revenue related to sales of automotive regulatory credits was $21 million and $140 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. We expect to recognize the majority of the deferred revenue as of December 31, 2020 in the next 12 months.

Automotive Leasing Revenue

Direct Vehicle Operating Leasing Program

We have outstanding leases under our direct vehicle operating leasing programs in the U.S., Canada and in certain countries in Europe. Qualifying customers are permitted to lease a vehicle directly from Tesla for up to 48 months. At the end of the lease term, customers are required to return the vehicles to us or for Model S and Model X leases in certain regions, may opt to purchase the vehicles for a pre-determined residual value. We account for these leasing transactions as operating leases. The amountWe record leasing revenues to automotive leasing revenue on a straight-line basis over the contractual term, and we record the depreciation of sale proceeds equalthese vehicles to cost of automotive leasing revenue. For the resale value guarantee isyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we recognized $752 million, $532 million and $393 million of direct vehicle leasing revenue, respectively. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had deferred until the guarantee expires or is exercised. The remaining sale proceeds are deferred$293 million and $218 million, respectively, of lease-related upfront payments, which will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the stated guarantee period to automotive leasing revenue. The guarantee period expires at the earliercontractual terms of the end ofindividual leases.

Our policy is to exclude taxes collected from a customer from the guarantee period or the pay-off of the initial loan. We capitalize the cost of these vehicles on the consolidated balance sheet as operating lease vehicles, net, and depreciate their value, less salvage value, to costtransaction price of automotive contracts.

Vehicle Sales to Leasing Partners with a Resale Value Guarantee and a Buyback Option

We offered buyback options in connection with automotive sales with resale value guarantees with certain leasing revenue overpartner sales in the same period.

In cases U.S. and where we expected the customer had a customer retains ownership of a vehicle at the end of the guarantee period,significant economic incentive to exercise the resale value guarantee liability and any remaining deferred revenue balances relatedprovided to the vehicle are settledthem at contract inception, we continued to automotive leasing revenue, and the net book value of the leased vehicle is expensed to cost of automotive leasing revenue. If a customer returns the vehicle to us during the guarantee period, we purchase the vehicle from the customer in an amount equal to the resale value guarantee and settle any remaining deferred balances to automotive leasing revenue, and we reclassify the net book value of the vehicle on the consolidated balance sheet to used vehicle inventory. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $375.7 million and $179.5 million, respectively, of the guarantees were exercisable by customers within the next 12 months.


Vehicle sales to leasing partners with a resale value guarantee

We also offer resale value guarantees in connection with automobile sales to certain leasing partners. As we have guaranteed the value of these vehicles and as the vehicles are leased to end-customers, we account forrecognize these transactions as interest bearingoperating leases. These transactions entailed a transfer of leases, which we had originated with an end-customer, to our leasing partner. As control of the vehicles had not been transferred in accordance with ASC 606, these transactions were accounted for as interest-bearing collateralized borrowings as required underin accordance with ASC 840,Leases., prior to January 1, 2019. Under this program, cash iswas received for the full price of the vehicle and isthe collateralized borrowing value was generally recorded within resale value guarantees forand the long-term portion andcustomer upfront down payment was recorded within deferred revenue for the current portion.revenue. We accreteamortize the deferred revenue amount to automotive leasing revenue on a straight-line basis over the guaranteeoption period and accrue interest expense based on our borrowing rate. The option period expires at the earlier of the end of the contractual option period or the pay-off of the initial loan. We capitalizecapitalized vehicles under this program to operating lease vehicles, net, on the consolidated balance sheet,sheets, and we record depreciation from these vehicles to cost of automotive leasing revenue during the period the vehicle is under a lease arrangement. Cash received for these vehicles, net of revenue recognized during the period, is classified as collateralized lease (repayments) borrowings within cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statementstatements of cash flows. Following the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, all new agreements under this program are accounted for as operating leases and there was no material change in the timing and amount of revenue recognized over the term. Consequently, any cash flows for new agreements are classified as operating cash activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows.

At the end of the lease term, we settle our liability in cash by either purchasing the vehicle from the leasing partner for the resale value guaranteebuyback option amount or paying a shortfall to the guaranteeoption amount the leasing partner may realize on the sale of the vehicle. Any remaining balances within deferred revenue and resale value guarantee will be settled to automotive leasing revenue. The end customer can extend the lease for a period of up to 6 months. In cases where the leasing partner retains ownership of the vehicle after the end of our guaranteeoption period, we expense the net value of the leased vehicle to cost of automotive leasing revenue. The maximum amount we could be required to pay under this program, should we decide to repurchase all vehicles, was $742.9$42 million and $855.9 $214 million as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, including $411.6$23 million within a 12-month period from December 31, 2017.

2020. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we had $1.64 billion$42 million and $1.18 billion$238 million, respectively, of such borrowings recorded in resale value guaranteesaccrued liabilities and $339.5other and other long-term liabilities and $11 million and $289.1$29 million, respectively, recorded in deferred revenue liability, respectively. As ofliability. For the years ended December 31,, 2017 2020, 2019 and 2016,2018, we had a total of $26.2recognized $77 million, $186 million and $57.0$332 million, respectively, in accounts receivable from ourof leasing partners.

On a quarterly basis, we assess the estimated market valuesrevenue related to this program. The net carrying amount of operating lease vehicles under our resale value guaranteethis program was $43 million and $190 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.


Direct Sales-Type Leasing Program

We have outstanding direct leases and vehicles financed by us under loan arrangements accounted for as sales-type leases under ASC 842 in certain countries in Asia and Europe, which we introduced in volume during the third quarter of 2020. Depending on the specific program, customers may or may not have a right to determine if wereturn the vehicle to us during or at the end of the lease term. If the customer does not have sustained a loss on any of these contracts. As we accumulate more data relatedright to return, the customer will take title to the resale values of our vehicles or as market conditions change, there may be material changes to their estimated values.


Activity related to our resale value guarantee and similar programs consistedvehicle at the end of the following (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Operating Lease Vehicles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease vehicles—beginning of period

 

$

2,462,061

 

 

$

1,556,529

 

Net increase in operating lease vehicles

 

 

1,208,445

 

 

 

1,355,128

 

Depreciation expense recorded in cost

   of automotive leasing revenues

 

 

(377,491

)

 

 

(255,167

)

Additional depreciation expense recorded in

   cost of automotive leasing revenues as

   a result of early cancellation of resale

   value guarantee

 

 

(22,156

)

 

 

(13,495

)

Additional depreciation expense recorded in

   cost of automotive leasing revenues

   as a result of expiration

 

 

(138,760

)

 

 

(114,264

)

Increases to inventory from vehicles

   returned under our trade-in program

   and exercises of resale value guarantee

 

 

(76,675

)

 

 

(66,670

)

Operating lease vehicles—end of period

 

$

3,055,424

 

 

$

2,462,061

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred revenue—beginning of period

 

$

916,652

 

 

$

679,132

 

Net increase in deferred revenue from new

   vehicle deliveries and reclassification of

   collateralized borrowing from long-term

   to short-term

 

 

742,817

 

 

 

715,011

 

Amortization of deferred revenue and

   short-term collateralized borrowing

   recorded in automotive leasing revenue

 

 

(634,317

)

 

 

(457,113

)

Additional revenue recorded in automotive

   leasing revenue as a result of early

   cancellation of resale value guarantee

 

 

(3,451

)

 

 

(5,192

)

Recognition of deferred revenue resulting

   from return of vehicle under trade-in

   program, expiration, and exercises of

   resale value guarantee

 

 

(15,765

)

 

 

(15,186

)

Deferred revenue—end of period

 

$

1,005,936

 

 

$

916,652

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resale Value Guarantee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resale value guarantee liability—beginning

   of period

 

$

2,389,927

 

 

$

1,430,573

 

Increase in resale value guarantee

 

 

1,201,660

 

 

 

1,267,445

 

Reclassification from long-term to

   short-term collateralized borrowing

 

 

(257,075

)

 

 

(116,078

)

Additional revenue recorded in automotive

   leasing revenue as a result of early

   cancellation of resale value guarantee

 

 

(18,781

)

 

 

(16,543

)

Release of resale value guarantee resulting

   from return of vehicle under trade-in

   program and exercises

 

 

(80,599

)

 

 

(62,919

)

Release of resale value guarantee resulting

   from expiration of resale value guarantee

 

 

(138,577

)

 

 

(112,551

)

Resale value guarantee liability—end of period

 

$

3,096,555

 

 

$

2,389,927

 

Direct Vehicle Leasing Program

We offerlease term after making all contractual payments. Under the programs for which there is a right to return, the purchase option is reasonably certain to be exercised by the lessee and we therefore expect the customer to take title to the vehicle leasing program in certain locations inat the North America and Europe.end of the lease term after making all contractual payments. Qualifying customers are permitted to lease a vehicle directly from Teslaunder these programs for up to 48 months. AtOur loan arrangements under these programs can have terms for up to 72 months. We recognize all revenue and costs associated with the end of thesales-type lease term,


customers have the option of either returning the vehicle to us or purchasing it for a pre-determined residual value. We account for these leasing transactions as operating leases, and we recognize leasing revenues on a straight-line basis over the contractual term and record the depreciation of these vehicles to cost of automotive leasing revenue. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had deferred $96.6 million and $67.2 million, respectively, of lease-related upfront payments which will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual term of the individual leases. Lease revenues are recorded in automotive leasing revenue and forautomotive leasing cost of revenue, respectively, upon delivery of the yearsvehicle to the customer. Interest income based on the implicit rate in the lease is recorded to automotive leasing revenue over time as customers are invoiced on a monthly basis. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,2020, we recognized $220.6$120 million $112.7of sales-type leasing revenue and $87 million and $41.2 million, respectively.of sales-type leasing cost of revenue.   

Regulatory Credits

California and certain other states have laws in place requiring vehicle manufacturers to ensure that a portion of the vehicles delivered for sale in that state during each model year are zero-emission vehicles. These laws and regulations provide that a manufacturer of zero-emission vehicles may earn regulatory credits (“ZEV credits”) and may sell excess credits to other manufacturers who apply such credits to comply with these regulatory requirements. Similar regulations exist at the federal level that require compliance related to greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and also allow for the sale of excess credits by one manufacturer to other manufacturers. As a manufacturer solely of zero-emission vehicles, we have earned emission credits, such as ZEV and GHG credits, on our vehicles, and we expect to continue to earn these credits in the future. We enter into contractual agreements with third-parties to purchase our regulatory credits.

We recognize revenue on the sale of regulatory credits at the time legal title to the regulatory credits is transferred to the purchasing party as automotive revenue in the consolidated statement of operations. Revenue from the sale of regulatory credits totaled $360.3 million, $302.3 million and $168.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Additionally, we have entered into agreements with the State of Nevada and Storey County in Nevada that will provide abatements for sales, use, real property, personal property and employer excise taxes, discounts to the base tariff energy rates and transferable tax credits. These incentives are available for the applicable periods beginning on October 17, 2014 and ending on June 30, 2034, subject to capital investments by us and our partners for Gigafactory 1 of at least $3.50 billion in the aggregate on or before June 30, 2024, which were met as of December 31, 2017, and certain other conditions specified in the agreements. If we do not satisfy one or more conditions under the agreement, we would be required to repay to the respective taxing authorities the amounts of the tax incentives incurred plus interest. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had earned $163.0 million and $45 million, respectively, of transferable tax credits under these agreements. We record these credits as earned when we have evidence there is a market for their sale. Credits are applied as a cost offset to either employee expense or to capital assets, depending on the source of the credits. Credits earned from employee hires or capital spending by our partners at Gigafactory 1 are recorded as a reduction to operating expenses.

ServiceServices and Other Revenue

ServiceServices and other revenue consists of non-warranty after-sales vehicle services, sales of used vehicles, retail merchandise, sales by our acquired subsidiaries to third party customers, and vehicle insurance revenue.

Revenues related to repair and maintenance services are recognized over time as services are provided and extended service plans merchandise, salesare recognized over the performance period of the service contract as the obligation represents a stand-ready obligation to the customer. We sell used Tesla vehicles, sales of electricservices, service plans, vehicle powertrain components and systemsmerchandise separately and thus use standalone selling prices as the basis for revenue allocation to the extent that these items are sold in transactions with other manufacturersperformance obligations. Payment for used vehicles, services, and salesmerchandise are typically received at the point when control transfers to the customer or in accordance with payment terms customary to the business. Payments received for prepaid plans are refundable upon customer cancellation of non-Tesla vehicle trade-ins.the related contracts and are included within customer deposits on the consolidated balance sheets. Deferred revenue related to services and other revenue was immaterial as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Energy Generation and Storage Segment

ForEnergy Generation and Storage Sales

Energy generation and storage sales revenue consists of the sale of solar energy systems and componentsenergy storage systems to residential, small commercial, and large commercial and utility grade customers. Energy generation and storage sales whereinrevenue also includes revenue from agreements for solar energy systems and power purchase agreements (“PPAs”) that commence after January 1, 2019, which is recognized as earned, based on the amount of capacity provided for solar energy systems or electricity delivered for PPAs at the contractual billing rates, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Under the practical expedient available under ASC 606-10-55-18, we recognize revenue based on the value of the service which is consistent with the billing amount. Sales of solar energy systems to residential and small scale commercial customers consist of the engineering, design, and installation of the system. Post installation, residential and small scale commercial customers receive a proprietary monitoring system that captures and displays historical energy generation data. Residential and small scale commercial customers pay the full purchase price either directly or throughof the solar loan program, revenueenergy system upfront. Revenue for the design and installation obligation is recognized when control transfers, which is when we install a solar energy system and the solar energy system passes inspection by the utility or the authority having jurisdiction, provided all otherjurisdiction. Revenue for the monitoring service is recognized ratably as a stand-ready obligation over the warranty period of the solar energy system. Sales of energy storage systems to residential and small scale commercial customers consist of the installation of the energy storage system and revenue recognition criteria haveis recognized when control transfers, which is when the product has been met. delivered or, if we are performing installation, when installed and commissioned. Payment for such storage systems is made upon invoice or in accordance with payment terms customary to the business.

For large commercial and utility grade solar energy system and energy storage system sales which consist of the engineering, design, and installation of the system, customers make milestone payments that are consistent with contract-specific phases of a project. Revenue from such contracts is recognized over time using the percentage of completion method based on cost incurred as a percentage of total estimated contract costs for energy storage system sales and as a percentage of total estimated labor hours for solar energy system sales. Certain large-scale commercial and utility grade solar energy system and energy storage system sales also include operations and maintenance service which are negotiated with the design and installation contracts and are thus considered to be a combined contract with the design and installation service. For certain large commercial and utility grade solar energy systems and energy storage systems where the percentage of completion method does not apply, revenue is recognized when control transfers, which is when the product has been delivered to the customer and commissioned for energy storage systems and when the project has received permission to operate from the utility for solar energy systems. Operations and maintenance service revenue is recognized ratably over the respective contract term for solar energy system sales and upon delivery of the service for energy storage system sales. Customer payments for such services are usually paid annually or quarterly in advance.


In instances where there are multiple deliverablesperformance obligations in a single arrangement,contract, we allocate the arrangement consideration to the various elementsobligations in the arrangementcontract based on the relative standalone selling price method. Standalone selling prices are estimated based on estimated costs plus margin or using market data for comparable products. Costs incurred on the sale of residential installations before the solar energy systems are completed are included as work in inventories as work-in-progressprocess within inventory in the consolidated balance sheet. However, anysheets. Any fees that are paid or payable by us to a solar loan lender would be recognized as an offset against revenue. Costs to obtain a contract relate mainly to commissions paid to our sales personnel related to the sale of solar energy systems and energy storage systems. As our contract costs related to solar energy system and energy storage system sales are typically fulfilled within one year, the costs to obtain a contract are expensed as incurred.

As part of our solar energy system and energy storage system contracts, we may provide the customer with performance guarantees that warrant that the underlying system will meet or exceed the minimum energy generation or energy performance requirements specified in the contract. In certain instances, we may receive a bonus payment if the system performs above a specified level. Conversely, if a solar energy system or energy storage system does not meet the performance guarantee requirements, we may be required to pay liquidated damages. Other forms of variable consideration related to our large commercial and utility grade solar energy system and energy storage system contracts include variable customer payments that will be made based on our energy market participation activities. Such guarantees and variable customer payments represent a form of variable consideration and are estimated at contract inception at their most likely amount and updated at the end of each reporting period as additional performance data becomes available. Such estimates are included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable a significant reversal of revenue will not occur.

We record as deferred revenue any non-refundable amounts that are collected from customers related to fees charged for prepayments and remote monitoring service and operations and maintenance service, which is recognized as revenue ratably over the respective customer contract term. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, deferred revenue related to such customer payments amounted to $187 million and $156 million, respectively. Revenue recognized from the deferred revenue balance as of December 31, 2019 was $34 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Revenue recognized from the deferred revenue balance as of December 31, 2018 was $41 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. We have elected the practical expedient to omit disclosure of the amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations for energy generation and storage revenue,sales with an original expected contract length of one year or less and the amount that we have the right to invoice when that amount corresponds directly with the value of the performance to date. As of December 31, 2020, total transaction price allocated to performance obligations that were unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied for contracts with an original expected length of more than one year was $100 million. Of this amount, we expect to recognize $6 million in accordance with ASC 605-50, Customer Paymentsthe next 12 months and Incentives. Revenue from an energy storage product sale is recognized when the product has been delivered, installedremaining over a period up to 27 years.

Energy Generation and accepted by the customer, provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.Storage Leasing


For revenue arrangements where we are the lessor under operating lease agreements for solar energy systems, including energygeneration and storage products, we record lease revenue from minimum lease payments, including upfront rebates and incentives earned from such systems, on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease term, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. For incentives that are earned based on the amount of electricity generated by the system, we record revenue as the amounts are earned. The difference between the payments received and the revenue recognized is recorded as deferred revenue or deferred asset on the consolidated balance sheet.

For solar energy systems where customers purchase electricity from us under power purchase agreements,PPAs prior to January 1, 2019, we have determined that these agreements should be accounted for in substance, as operating leases pursuant to ASC 840. Revenue is recognized based on the amount of electricity delivered at rates specified under the contracts, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

We record as deferred revenue any amounts that are collected from customers, including lease prepayments, in excess of revenue recognized.recognized and operations and maintenance service fees, which is recognized as revenue ratably over the respective customer contract term. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, deferred revenue related to such customer payments amounted to $206 million and $226 million, respectively. Deferred revenue also includes the portion of rebates and incentives received from utility companies and various local and state government agencies, which areis recognized as revenue over the lease term, as well as the fees charged for remote monitoring service, which is recognized as revenue ratably over the respective customer contract term. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, deferred revenue related to such customer payments amounted to $320.0 million and $268.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2019, deferred revenue from rebates and incentives was not material.amounted to $29 million and $36 million, respectively.

We capitalize initial direct costs from the originationexecution of agreements for solar energy system leases or power purchase agreements (i.e.systems and PPAs, which include the incremental cost of contract administration, referral fees and sales commissions)commissions, as an element of solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net, and subsequently amortize these costs over the term of the related lease or power purchase agreement.agreements.


Cost of RevenueRevenues

Automotive Segment

Automotive Sales

Cost of automotive sales revenue includes direct parts, material and labor costs, manufacturing overhead, (including amortizedincluding depreciation costs of tooling costs),and machinery, shipping and logistic costs, vehicle internet connectivity costs, allocations of electricity and infrastructure costs related to our Supercharger network, and reserves for estimated warranty expenses. Cost of automotive revenuesales revenues also includes adjustments to warranty expense and charges to write-downwrite down the carrying value of our inventory when it exceeds its estimated net realizable value and to provide for obsolete and on-hand inventory that is either obsolete or in excess of forecasted demand.demand.

Automotive Leasing

Cost of automotive leasing revenue includes primarily the amortization of operating lease vehicles over the lease term, cost of goods sold associated with direct sales-type leases, as well as warranty expenses recognized as incurred.related to leased vehicles. Cost of automotive leasing revenue also includes vehicle connectivity costs and allocations of electricity and infrastructure costs related to our Supercharger network for vehicles under our leasing programs.

ServiceServices and Other

CostCosts of serviceservices and other revenue includes costs associated with providing non-warranty after-sales services, costs to acquire and certify used vehicles, costs for retail merchandise, and costs to provide vehicle insurance. Cost of services and other revenue also includes direct parts, material and labor costs, manufacturing overhead associated with the sales of electric vehicle powertrain components and systemsby our acquired subsidiaries to other manufacturers, costs associated with providing maintenance and development services and costs associated with sales of used vehicles.third party customers.

Energy Generation and Storage Segment

Energy Generation and Storage

Cost of energy generation and storage cost of revenue includes direct and indirect material and labor costs, warehouse rent, freight, warranty expense, other overhead costs and amortization of certain acquired intangible assets. Cost of energy generation and storage revenue also includes charges to write down the carrying value of our inventory when it exceeds its estimated net realizable value and to provide for obsolete and on-hand inventory in excess of forecasted demand. In addition,agreements for solar energy system and PPAs where arrangementswe are accounted for as operating leases,the lessor, the cost of revenue is primarily comprised of depreciation of the cost of leased solar energy systems, maintenance costs associated with those systems and amortization of any initial direct costs.

Sales and Other Use Taxes

Taxes assessed by various government entities, such as sales, use and value added taxes, collected at the time of sale are excluded from automotive net sales and revenue.

 


Transportation CostsLeases

Amounts billedWe adopted ASC 842, Leases, as of January 1, 2019 using the cumulative effect adjustment approach (“adoption of the new lease standard”). In addition, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which allowed us to customers relatedcarry forward the historical determination of contracts as leases, lease classification and not reassess initial direct costs for historical lease arrangements. Accordingly, previously reported financial statements, including footnote disclosures, have not been recast to shipping and handling arereflect the application of the new standard to all comparative periods presented. The finance lease classification under ASC 842 includes leases previously classified as automotive revenue, and the related transportation costs are included in cost of automotive revenue.capital leases under ASC 840.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Marketing, Promotional and Advertising Costs

Marketing, promotional and advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included as an element of selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations. We incurred marketing,Marketing, promotional and advertising costs of $66.5 million, $48.0 million and $58.3 million inwere immaterial for       the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015, respectively.2018.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.


We record liabilities related to uncertain tax positions when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are supportable, we believe that it is more likely than not that those positions may not be fully sustained upon review by tax authorities. Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified as income tax expense.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") subjects a U.S. shareholder to tax on global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. Under GAAP, we can make an accounting policy election to either treat taxes due on the GILTI inclusion as a current period expense or factor such amounts into our measurement of deferred taxes. We elected the deferred method, under which we recorded the corresponding deferred tax assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, currently subject to valuation allowance.  

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges and available-for-sale marketable securities and foreign currency translation adjustments that have been excluded from the determination of net income (loss).

Stock-Based Compensation

We recognize compensation expense for costs related to all share-based payments, including stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and our employee stock purchase plan (the “ESPP”). The fair value of stock options and the ESPPoption awards with only service and/or performance conditions is estimated on the grant or offering date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of RSUs is measured on the grant date based on the closing fair market value of our common stock. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, net of actual forfeitures in the period (prior to 2017, net of estimated projected forfeitures). Stock-based compensation associated with awards assumed from the acquisition of SolarCity Corporation (“SolarCity”) is measured as of the acquisition date using the relevant assumptions and recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining requisite service period, net of actual forfeitures in the period (prior to 2017, net of estimated projected forfeitures).period.

For performance-based awards, stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the expected performance achievement period of individual performance milestones when the achievement of each individual performance milestone becomes probable. For performance-based awards with a vesting schedule based entirely on the attainment of both performance and market conditions, stock-based compensation expense associated with each tranche is recognized for each pair of performance and market conditions over the longer of (i) the expected achievement period offor the performanceoperational milestone for such tranche and (ii) the expected achievement period for the related market conditions,capitalization milestone determined on the grant date, beginning at the point in time thatwhen the relevant performance conditionoperational milestone is considered probable of achievement.being achieved. If such operational milestone becomes probable any time after the grant date, we will recognize a cumulative catch-up expense from the grant date to that point in time. If the related market capitalization milestone is achieved earlier than its expected achievement period and the achievement of the related operational milestone, then the stock-based compensation expense will be recognized over the expected achievement period for the operational milestone, which may accelerate the rate at which such expense is recognized. The fair value of such awards is estimated on the grant date using Monte Carlo simulations (see Note 15,14, Equity Incentive Plans).

As we accumulate additional employee stock-based awards data over time and as we incorporate market data related to our common stock, we may calculate significantly different volatilities and expected lives, which could materially impact the valuation of our stock-based awards and the stock-based compensation expense that we will recognize in future periods. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded in cost of revenues, research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.


Noncontrolling Interests and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

Noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests represent third-party interests in the net assets under certain funding arrangements, or funds, that we enter into to finance the costs of solar energy systems


and vehicles under operating leases. We have determined that the contractual provisions of the funds represent substantive profit sharing arrangements. We have further determined that the appropriate methodology for calculating the noncontrolling interest and redeemable noncontrolling interest balances that reflects the substantive profit sharing arrangements is a balance sheet approach using the hypothetical liquidation at book value (“HLBV”) method. We, therefore, determine the amount of the noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests in the net assets of the funds at each balance sheet date using the HLBV method, which is presented on the consolidated balance sheet as noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and redeemable noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries. Under the HLBV method, the amounts reported as noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests in the consolidated balance sheet represent the amounts the third-partiesthird parties would hypothetically receive at each balance sheet date under the liquidation provisions of the funds, assuming the net assets of the funds were liquidated at their recorded amounts determined in accordance with GAAP and with tax laws effective at the balance sheet date and distributed to the third-parties.third parties. The third-parties’third parties’ interests in the results of operations of the funds are determined as the difference in the noncontrolling interest and redeemable noncontrolling interest balances in the consolidated balance sheets between the start and end of each reporting period, after taking into account any capital transactions between the funds and the third-parties.third parties. However, the redeemable noncontrolling interest balance is at least equal to the redemption amount. The redeemable noncontrolling interest balance is presented as temporary equity in the mezzanine section of the consolidated balance sheet since these third-partiesthird parties have the right to redeem their interests in the funds for cash or other assets. For certain funds, there may be significant fluctuations in the ending balance of redeemable noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries and net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries due to changes in the liquidation provisions as time-based milestones are reached.

Net Income (Loss) per Share of Common Stock Attributable to Common Stockholders

Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for the period. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we decreased net income attributable to common stockholders by $31 million to arrive at the numerator used to calculate net income per share. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we increased net loss attributable to common stockholders by $8 million to arrive at the numerator used to calculate net loss per share. These adjustments represent the difference between the cash we paid to the financing fund investors for their noncontrolling interest in our subsidiaries and the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest on our consolidated balance sheets, in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. Potentially dilutive shares, which are based on the weighted-average shares of common stock underlying outstanding stock-based awards, warrants and convertible senior notes using the treasury stock method or the if-converted method, as applicable, are included when calculating diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable to common stockholders when their effect is dilutive. Since we expectintend to settle or have settled in cash the principal outstanding under theour 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2019 the(“2019 Notes”), 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2021 and the(“2021 Notes”), 2.375% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2022 (“2022 Notes”), 2024 Notes and our subsidiary’s 5.50% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2022, we use the treasury stock method applied using our average share price during the period when calculating their potential dilutive effect, if any. any. Furthermore, in connection with the offerings of our convertible senior notes, we entered into convertible note hedges and warrants (see Note 12, Debt). However, our convertible note hedges are not included when calculating potentially dilutive shares since their effect is always anti-dilutive. Warrants which have a strike price above our average share price during the period were out of the money and were not included in the tables below. Warrants will be included in the weighted-average shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share of common stock in the period(s) they are settled.

The following table presents the reconciliation of basic to diluted weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable to common stockholders, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split (in millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Weighted average shares used in computing

   net income (loss) per share of common

   stock, basic

 

 

933

 

 

 

887

 

 

 

853

 

Add:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based awards

 

 

66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible senior notes

 

 

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrants

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares used in computing

   net income (loss) per share of common stock,

   diluted

 

 

1,083

 

 

 

887

 

 

 

853

 


The following table presents the potentially dilutive shares that were excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock attributable to common stockholders, because their effect was anti-dilutive:anti-dilutive (in millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Stock-based awards

 

 

10,456,363

 

 

 

12,091,473

 

 

 

15,592,736

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

50

 

Convertible senior notes

 

 

2,315,463

 

 

 

841,191

 

 

 

2,431,265

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

7

 

Warrants

 

 

579,137

 

 

 

262,702

 

 

 

1,049,791

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

Business Combinations

We account for business acquisitions under ASC 805, Business Combinations. The total purchase consideration for an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. Costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition are expensed as incurred. Identifiable assets (including intangible assets), liabilities assumed (including contingent liabilities) and noncontrolling interests in an acquisition are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. We recognize goodwill if the fair value of the total purchase consideration and any noncontrolling interests is in excess of the net fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. We recognize a bargain purchase gain within other income (expense), net, on the consolidated statement of operations if the net fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed is in excess of the fair value of the total purchase consideration and any noncontrolling interests. We include the results of operations of the acquired business in the consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered cash equivalents. Our cash equivalents are primarily comprised of money market funds.


Restricted Cash and Deposits

We maintain certain cash balances restricted as to withdrawal or use. Our restricted cash is comprised primarily of cash as collateral for our sales to lease partners with a resale value guarantee, letters of credit, real estate leases, insurance policies, credit card borrowing facilities and certain operating leases. In addition, restricted cash includes cash received from certain fund investors that have not been released for use by us and cash held to service certain payments under various secured debt facilities. We record restricted cash as other assets in the consolidated balance sheets and determine current or non-current classification based on the expected duration of the restriction.

Our total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows, was as follows (in millions):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

19,384

 

 

$

6,268

 

 

$

3,686

 

Restricted cash included in prepaid expenses

   and other current assets

 

 

238

 

 

 

246

 

 

 

193

 

Restricted cash included in other non-current assets

 

 

279

 

 

 

269

 

 

 

398

 

Total as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows

 

$

19,901

 

 

$

6,783

 

 

$

4,277

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable primarily include amounts related to sales of powertrain systems, sales of energy generation and storage products, receivables from financial institutions and leasing companies offering various financing products to our customers, sales of energy generation and storage products, sales of regulatory credits to other automotive manufacturers, government rebates already passed through to customers and maintenance services on vehicles owned by leasing companies. We provide an allowance against accounts receivable tofor the amount we reasonably believe willexpect to be collected.uncollectible. We write-off accounts receivable against the allowance when they are deemed uncollectible.


We typically do not carry significantDepending on the day of the week on which the end of a fiscal quarter falls, our accounts receivable related to our vehicle and related salesbalance may fluctuate as we are waiting for certain customer payments to clear through our banking institutions and receipts of payments from our financing partners, which can take up to approximately two weeks based on the contractual payment terms with such partners. Our accounts receivable balances associated with our sales of regulatory credits, which are due priortypically transferred to vehicle delivery, except for amounts dueother manufacturers during the last few days of the quarter, is dependent on contractual payment terms. Additionally, government rebates can take up to a year or more to be collected depending on the customary processing timelines of the specific jurisdictions issuing them. These various factors may have a significant impact on our accounts receivable balance from commercial financial institutions for approved financing arrangements between our customers and the financial institutions.period to period.

MyPower Customer Notes Receivable

We have customer notes receivable under the legacy MyPower loan program. MyPower was offered by SolarCityone of our subsidiaries to provide residential customers with the option to finance the purchase of a solar energy system through a 30-year loan. The outstanding balances, net of any allowance for potentially uncollectible amounts,credit losses, are presented on the consolidated balance sheet as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets for the current portion and as MyPower customer notes receivable, net of current portion,other non-current assets for the long-term portion. In determining the allowance andWe adopted ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, on January 1, 2020 on a modified retrospective basis. Under ASC 326, expected credit qualityloss for customer notes receivable we identify significant customers with known disputes or collection issuesare measured on a collective basis and alsoare determined as the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of cash flows expected to be collected. In determining expected credit losses, we consider our historical level of credit losses, and current economic trends, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that might impactaffect the levelcollectability of the future credit losses. Customercash flows. We write-off customer notes receivable thatwhen they are individually impaired are charged-off as a write-off of the allowance for losses. Since acquisition, there have been no new significant customers with known disputes or collection issues,deemed uncollectible and the amount of potentially uncollectible amounts has been insignificant. Accordingly,Using a modified retrospective approach for the impact upon adoption, we did not establishrecorded an increase to the allowance for credit losses againstof $37 million on January 1, 2020, with an offset to accumulated deficit. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the total outstanding balance of MyPower customer notes receivable.receivable, net of allowance for credit losses, was $334 million and $402 million, respectively, of which $9 million was due in the next 12 months as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, the allowance for credit losses was $45 million. In addition, there were no0 material non-accrual or past due customer notes receivable as of December 31, 2017.2020.

Concentration of Risk

Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, convertible note hedges, and interest rate swaps. Our cash balances are primarily invested in money market funds or on deposit at high credit quality financial institutions in the U.S. At times, theseThese deposits may beare typically in excess of insured limits. As of December 31, 2017, no2020 and 2019, 0 entity represented 10% or more of our total accounts receivable balance. As of December 31, 2016, one entity represented approximately 10% of our total accounts receivable balance. The risk of concentration for our convertible note hedges and interest rate swaps is mitigated by transacting with several highly-rated multinational banks.

Supply Risk

We are dependent on our suppliers, the majority of which are single source suppliers, and the inability of these suppliers to deliver necessary components of our products in a timely manner at prices, quality levels and volumes acceptable to us, or our inability to efficiently manage these components from these suppliers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

Although all of our manufacturing facilities are operational, and we continue to increase our output and add additional capacity and are working with each of our suppliers and government agencies on meeting, ramping and sustaining our production, our ability to sustain this trajectory depends, among other things, on the readiness and solvency of our suppliers and vendors through any macroeconomic factors resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Inventory Valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is computed using standard cost for vehicles and energy storage products, which approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. In addition, cost


for solar energy systems areis recorded using actual cost. We record inventory write-downs for excess or obsolete inventories based upon assumptions about on current and future demand forecasts. If our inventory on-hand is in excess of our future demand forecast, the excess amounts are written-off.

We also review our inventory to determine whether its carrying value exceeds the net amount realizable upon the ultimate sale of the inventory. This requires us to determine the estimated selling price of our vehicles less the estimated cost to convert the inventory on-hand into a finished product. Once inventory is written-down, a new, lower cost basis for that inventory is established and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.

Should our estimates of future selling prices or production costs change, additional and potentially material increases to this reserve may be required. A small change in our estimates may result in a material charge to our reported financial results.


Operating Lease Vehicles

Vehicles delivered under our resale value guarantee program, vehicles that are leased as part of our direct vehicle leasing programs as well as anyprogram and vehicles that are solddelivered to leasing partners with a resale value guarantee and a buyback option where there is significant buy-back guaranteeeconomic incentive to exercise at contract inception are classified as operating lease vehicles as the related revenue transactions are treated as operating leases.leases under ASC 842 (refer to the Automotive Leasing Revenue section above for details). Operating lease vehicles are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computedWe generally depreciate their value, less salvage value, using the straight-line methodstraight-line-method to cost of automotive leasing revenue over the expected operating lease term.contractual period. The totalgross cost of operating lease vehicles recordedas of December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $3.54 billion and $2.85 billion, respectively. Operating lease vehicles on the consolidated balance sheets are presented net of accumulated depreciation of $446 million and $406 million as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016 was $4.85 billion and $3.53 billion, respectively. Accumulated depreciation related to leased vehicles as of December 31, 2017, and 2016 was $733.3 million and $399.5 million,2019, respectively.

Solar Energy Systems, Leased and To Be LeasedNet

We are the lessor of solar energy systems undersystems. Prior to January 1, 2019, these leases that qualifywere accounted for as operating leases. Our leases are accounted for in accordance with ASC 840. ToUnder ASC 840, to determine lease classification, we evaluateevaluated the lease terms to determine whether there iswas a transfer of ownership or bargain purchase option at the end of the lease, whether the lease term iswas greater than 75% of the useful life or whether the present value of the minimum lease payments exceedexceeded 90% of the fair value at lease inception. Agreements for solar energy system leases and PPAs that commence after January 1, 2019 no longer meet the definition of a lease upon the adoption of ASC 842 and are instead accounted for in accordance with ASC 606. We utilize periodic appraisals to estimate useful lives and fair values at lease inception and residual values at lease termination. Solar energy systems are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.

Depreciation and amortization is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, as follows:

 

Solar energy systems leased to customersin service

 

30 to 35 years

Initial direct costs related to customer

   solar

energy system lease acquisition

   costs

 

Lease term (up to 25 years)

 

Solar energy systems held for lease to customers are installed systems pending interconnection with the respective utility companies and will be depreciated as solar energy systems leased to customersin service when they have been interconnected and placed in-service. Solar energy systems under construction represents systems that are under installation, which will be depreciated as solar energy systems leased to customersin service when they are completed, interconnected and leased to customers.placed in service. Initial direct costs related to customer solar energy system leaseagreement acquisition costs are capitalized and amortized over the term of the related customer lease agreements.


Property, Plant and Equipment, net

Property, plant and equipment, net, including leasehold improvements, are recognized at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.depreciation. Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, as follows:

 

Machinery, equipment, vehicles and office

   office furniture

 

2 to 12 years

Building and building improvements

 

15 to 30 years

Computer equipment and software

 

3 to 10 years

 

Depreciation for tooling is computed using the units-of-production method whereby capitalized costs are amortized over the total estimated productive life of the respective assets. As of December 31, 2017, the estimated productive life for Model S and X tooling was 250,000 vehicles based on our current estimates of production. As of December 31, 2017, the estimated productive life for Model 3 tooling was 1,000,000 vehicles based on our current estimates of production.

Leasehold improvements are amortizeddepreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the terms of the related leases.

Upon the retirement or sale of our property, plant and equipment, the cost and associated accumulated depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet, and the resulting gain or loss is reflected on the consolidated statement of operations. Maintenance and repair expenditures are expensed as incurred while major improvements that increase the functionality, output or expected life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated ratably over the identified useful life.

Interest expense on outstanding debt is capitalized during the period of significant capital asset construction. Capitalized interest on construction-in-progress is included within property, plant and equipment, net and is amortized over the life of the related assets.

Furthermore, we are deemed to be the owner, for accounting purposes, during the construction phase of certain long-lived assets under build-to-suit lease arrangements because of our involvement with the construction, our exposure to any potential cost overruns or our other commitments under the arrangements. In these cases, we recognize build-to-suit lease assets under construction and corresponding build-to-suit lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet, in accordance with ASC 840. Once construction is completed, if a lease meets certain “sale-leaseback” criteria, we remove the asset and liability and account for the lease as an operating lease. Otherwise, the lease is accounted for as a capital lease.


Long-Lived Assets Including Acquired Intangible Assets

We review our property, plant and equipment, solar energy systems, long-term prepayments and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset (or asset group) may not be recoverable. We measure recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate. If the asset is not recoverable, its carrying amount would be adjusted-downadjusted down to its fair value. WeFor the year ended December 31, 2020, we have recognized no material impairments of our long-lived assets. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we have recognized certain impairments of our long-lived assets in any of the periods presented.(refer to  Note 22, Restructuring and Other, for further details).

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from twoone to thirty years.

Goodwill

We assess goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired, by comparing its carrying value to the reporting unit’s fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, we had 0t recognized any impairment of goodwill.

Capitalization of Software Costs

For costs incurred in development of internal use software, we capitalize costs incurred during the application development stage.stage to property, plant and equipment, net on the consolidated balance sheets. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post-implementation activities are expensed as incurred. Internal use software is amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of three to ten years. We evaluate the useful lives of these assets on an annual basis, and we test for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances occur that could impact the recoverability of these assets.


Foreign Currency

We determine the functional and reporting currency of each of our international subsidiaries and their operating divisions based on the primary currency in which they operate. In cases where the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, we recognize a cumulative translation adjustment created by the different rates we apply to accumulated deficits, including current period income or loss and the balance sheet. For each subsidiary, we apply the monthly average functional currencyexchange rate to its monthly income or loss and the month-end functional currency rate to translate the balance sheet.

Beginning on January 1, 2015, the functional currency of each of our foreign subsidiaries was changed to their local country’s currency. This change was based on the culmination of facts and circumstances that had developed as we expanded our foreign operations. The adjustment of $10.0 million attributable to the translation of non-monetary assets and liabilities as of the date of change is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet.

Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are a result of the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. Transaction gains and losses are recognized in other (expense) income, (expense), net, onin the consolidated statementstatements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, we recorded net foreign currency transaction losses of $114 million, gains (losses) of $52.3 million, $26.1$48 million and ($45.6)gains of $2 million, respectively.


Warranties

We provide a manufacturer’s warranty on all new and used vehicles production powertrain components and systems and energy products we sell. In addition, we also provide a warranty on the installation and components of the solar energy generation and storage systems we sell for periods typically between 10 to 3025 years. We accrue a warranty reserve for the products sold by us, which includes our best estimate of the projected costs to repair or replace items under warranty.warranties and recalls when identified. These estimates are based on actual claims incurred to date and an estimate of the nature, frequency and costs of future claims. These estimates are inherently uncertain given our relatively short history of sales, and changes to our historical or projected warranty experience may cause material changes to the warranty reserve in the future. The warranty reserve does not include projected warranty costs associated with our vehicles subject to operating lease accounting and our solar energy systems under lease contracts or power purchase agreements,PPAs, as the costs to repair these warranty claims are expensed as incurred. The portion of the warranty reserve expected to be incurred within the next 12 months is included within accrued liabilities and other, while the remaining balance is included within other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.sheets. Warranty expense is recorded as a component of cost of revenues.revenues in the consolidated statements of operations. Due to the magnitude of our automotive business, accrued warranty balance was primarily related to our automotive segment. Accrued warranty activity consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Accrued warranty—beginning of period

 

$

266,655

 

 

$

180,754

 

 

$

129,043

 

 

$

1,089

 

 

$

748

 

 

$

402

 

Assumed warranty liability from acquisition

 

 

4,737

 

 

 

31,366

 

 

 

 

Warranty costs incurred

 

 

(122,510

)

 

 

(79,147

)

 

 

(52,760

)

 

 

(312

)

 

 

(250

)

 

 

(209

)

Net changes in liability for pre-existing

warranties, including expirations and

foreign exchange impact

 

 

4,342

 

 

 

(20,084

)

 

 

1,470

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

(26

)

Additional warranty accrued from adoption of ASC 606

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37

 

Provision for warranty

 

 

248,566

 

 

 

153,766

 

 

 

103,001

 

 

 

625

 

 

 

555

 

 

 

544

 

Accrued warranty—end of period

 

$

401,790

 

 

$

266,655

 

 

$

180,754

 

 

$

1,468

 

 

$

1,089

 

 

$

748

 

 

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, warranty costs incurred for vehicles accounted for as operating leases or collateralized debt arrangements were $35.5 million and $19.0 million, respectively.

Solar Energy Systems Performance Guarantees

We guarantee certain specified minimum solar energy production output for certain solar energy systems leased or sold to customers, generally for a term of up to 30 years. We monitor the solar energy systems to ensure that these outputs are being achieved. We evaluate if any amounts are due to our customers and make any payments periodically as specified in the customer agreements. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had recognized a


liability of $6.3 million and $6.6 million, respectively, within accrued liabilities and other on the consolidated balance sheets, related to these guarantees based on our assessment of the exposure.

Solar Renewable Energy Credits

We account for solar renewable energy creditsSolar Renewable Energy Certificates (“SRECs”) when they are purchased by us or sold to third-parties.third parties. For SRECs generated by solar energy systems owned by us and minted by government agencies, we do not recognize any specifically identifiable costs for those SRECs as there are no specific incremental costs incurred to generate the SRECs. For SRECs purchased by us, we record these SRECs at their cost, subject to impairment testing. We recognize revenue within the energy generation and storage segment from the sale of an SREC when the SREC is transferred to the buyer, and the cost of the SREC, if any, is then recorded to energy generation and storage cost of revenue.

Deferred InvestmentNevada Tax Credit RevenueIncentives

In connection with the construction of Gigafactory Nevada, we entered into agreements with the State of Nevada and Storey County in Nevada that provide abatements for specified taxes, discounts to the base tariff energy rates and transferable tax credits of up to $195.0 million in consideration of capital investment and hiring targets that were met at Gigafactory Nevada. These incentives are available until June 2024 or June 2034, depending on the incentive. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had earned the maximum of $195 million of transferable tax credits under these agreements.

Gigafactory Texas Tax Incentives

In connection with the construction of Gigafactory Texas, we entered into a 20-year agreement with Travis County in Texas pursuant to which we would receive grant funding equal to 70-80% of property taxes paid by us to Travis County and a separate 10-year agreement with the Del Valle Independent School District in Texas pursuant to which a portion of the taxable value of our property would be capped at a specified amount, in each case subject to our meeting certain minimum economic development metrics through our construction and operations at Gigafactory Texas. As of December 31, 2020, we had 0t yet received any grant funding related to property taxes paid to Travis County.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. The amendments in the ASU include removing exceptions to incremental intraperiod tax allocation of losses and gains from different financial statement components, exceptions to the method of recognizing income taxes on interim period losses, and exceptions to deferred tax liability recognition related to foreign subsidiary investments. In addition, the ASU requires that entities recognize franchise tax based on an incremental method and requires an entity to evaluate the accounting for step-ups in the tax basis of goodwill as inside or outside of a business combination. The amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods therein. Early adoption of the standard is permitted, including adoption in interim or annual periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. We have solar energy systemsnot early adopted this ASU as of December 31, 2020. The ASU is currently not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (Topic 848). The ASU provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to transactions affected by reference rate (e.g., LIBOR) reform if certain criteria are met, for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. The ASU is effective as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. We will evaluate transactions or contract modifications occurring as a result of reference rate reform and determine whether to apply the optional guidance on an ongoing basis. The ASU is currently not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. The ASU simplifies the accounting for convertible instruments by removing certain separation models in ASC 470- 20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options, for convertible instruments. The ASU updates the guidance on certain embedded conversion features that are eligiblenot required to be accounted for investment tax credits (“ITCs”)as derivatives under Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or that accrue to eligible property under the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”). Under Section 50(d)(5) of the IRC and the related regulations, a lessor of qualifying property may elect to treat the lesseedo not result in substantial premiums accounted for as the owner ofpaid-in capital, such property for the purposes of claiming the ITCs associated with such property. These regulations enable the ITCsthat those features are no longer required to be separated from the ownership of the property and allow the transfer of the ITCs. Under our lease pass-through fund arrangements, we can make a tax election to pass-through the ITCs to the investors, who are the legal lessee of the property. Therefore, we are able to monetize these ITCs to the investors who can utilize them in return for cash payments. We consider the monetization of ITCs to constitute one of the key elements of realizing the value associated with solar energy systems. Consequently, we consider the proceeds from the monetization of ITCs to be a component of revenue generated from solar energy systems.

In accordance with the relevant FASB guidance, we recognize revenue from the monetization of ITCs when (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) the sales price is fixed or determinable and (4) collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. An ITC is subject to recapture under the IRC if the underlying solar energy system either ceases to be a qualifying property or undergoes a change in ownership within five years of its placed-in-service date; the recapture amount decreases on each anniversary of the placed-in-service date. Since we have an obligation to ensure that the solar energy system is in-service and operational for a term of five years in order to avoid any recapture of the ITC, we recognize revenue as the recapture amount decreases, assuming the other revenue recognition criteria above have been met. As a result, the monetized ITC is initially recorded as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheets, and subsequently, one-fifth of the monetized ITC is recognized as energy generation and storage revenue on the consolidated statement of operations on each anniversary of the solar energy system’s placed-in-service date over five years.

We indemnify the investors for any recapture of ITCs due to our non-compliance. We have concluded that the likelihood of a recapture event is remote, and consequently, we have not recognized a liability for this indemnification on the consolidated balance sheets.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, to replace the existing revenue recognition criteria for contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Deferral of the Effective Date, to defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 to interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Principal versus Agent Considerations, ASU No. 2016-10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, ASU No. 2016-11, Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting, ASU No. 2016-12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, and ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements, to clarify and amend the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09. Wehost contract. The convertible debt instruments will adopt the ASUs on January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative adjustment to accumulated deficit. The adoption of the ASUs will accelerate the revenue recognition of certain vehicle sales to customers or leasing partners with a resale value guarantee, which will therefore qualify to be accounted for as sales with a right of return as opposedsingle liability measured at amortized cost. This will also result in the interest expense recognized for convertible debt instruments to be typically closer to the current accounting as operating leases or collateralized lease borrowings. Our interpretationcoupon interest rate when applying the guidance in Topic 835, Interest. Further, the ASU made amendments to the EPS guidance in Topic 260 for convertible instruments, the most significant impact of which is subject to change as a result of future changes in market conditions, incentives or program offerings. Upon adoptionrequiring the use of the ASUs, we currently estimate a decrease to our beginning accumulated deficit inif-converted method for diluted EPS calculation, and no longer allowing the range of


$520.0 million to $570.0 million before income tax effects (which are still being assessed), including the impact of adjusting deferred revenue for ITC balances, as of January 1, 2018. We are continuing to assess the impact of adopting the ASUs on the consolidated financial statements, and we are continuing to adjust our accounting policies, operational and financial reporting processes, systems and related internal controls accordingly.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, to require lessees to recognize all leases, with certain exceptions, on the balance sheet, while recognition on the statement of operations will remain similar to current lease accounting.net share settlement method. The ASU also eliminates real estate-specific provisions and modifies certain aspectsmade revisions to Topic 815-40, which provides guidance on how an entity must determine whether a contract qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. The amendments to Topic 815-40 change the scope of lessor accounting.contracts that are recognized as assets or liabilities. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018,2021, with early adoption permitted. We currently expect to adopt the ASU on January 1, 2019. We will be required to recognize and measure leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented using a modified retrospective approach, with certain practical expedients available. We intend to elect the available practical expedients upon adoption. Upon adoption, we expect the consolidated balance sheet to include a right of use asset and liability related to substantially all of our lease arrangements. We are continuing to assess the impact of adopting the ASU on our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures and have not yet concluded whether the effect on the consolidated financial statements will be material.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06, Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments, to clarify when a contingent put or call option to accelerate the repayment of debt is an embedded derivative. The ASU is effectivepermitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016.2020. Adoption of the ASU is modified retrospective. We adopted the ASUcan either be on January 1, 2017, but the ASU did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, to simplify the accounting for the income tax effects from share-based compensation, the accounting for forfeitures and the accounting for statutory income tax withholding, among others. In particular, the ASU requires all income tax effects from share-based compensation to be recognized in the consolidated statement of operations when the awards vest or are settled, the ASU permits accounting for forfeitures as they occur, and the ASU permits a higher level of statutory income tax withholding without triggering liability accounting. Adoption of the ASU is modified retrospective or full retrospective and prospective, depending on the specific provision being adopted. We adopted the ASU on January 1, 2017, which increased our beginning accumulated deficit and additional paid-in capital by $15.7 million. Furthermore, our gross U.S. deferred tax assets increased by $909.1 million, which was fully offset by a corresponding increase to our valuation allowance, upon adoption. In addition, beginning on January 1, 2017, we account for forfeitures as they occur.basis.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, to reduce the diversity in practice with respect to the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Adoption of the ASU is retrospective. We will adopt the ASU on January 1, 2018,2021 on a modified retrospective basis. The adoption is expected to reduce additional paid in capital and convertible senior notes (mezzanine equity) by approximately $475 million and $50 million, respectively for the recombination of the equity conversion component of our convertible debt remaining outstanding, which was initially separated and recorded in equity, remove the remaining debt discounts recorded for this previous separation for approximately $269 million and reduce property, plant and equipment for previously capitalized interest by approximately $45 million, as a result. The net effect of these adjustments will be recorded as a reduction in the balance of our opening accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2021.

We currently expect the adoption of the ASU will result in the reduction of non-cash interest expense  for the year ending December 31, 2021 and until the affected notes have been settled, before the impact of reduction of our interest capitalization, which is not expected to be material. The reduction of depreciation expense through cost of goods sold is not expected to be material for the classifications withinyear ending December 31, 2021. These reduced expenses will increase the income attributable to common stockholders for both basic and diluted earnings per share. The required use of the if converted method is not expected to have a significant impact on the calculation of common share equivalents included in the measure of our diluted earnings per share for our 2021 Notes, 2022 Notes, 2024 Notes and our subsidiary’s 5.50% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2022. The amendments to the derivative accounting guidance are not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. The adoption will have no impact on the consolidated statement of cash flows.


Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

In OctoberJune 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers2016-13, Measurement of Assets Other Than Inventory,Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, to require financial assets carried at amortized cost to be presented at the recognitionnet amount expected to be collected based on historical experience, current conditions and forecasts. Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, to clarify that receivables arising from operating leases are within the scope of lease accounting standards. Further, the income tax effects from an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. TheFASB issued ASU is effective for interimNo. 2019-04, ASU No. 2019-05, ASU 2019-10, ASU 2019-11, ASU 2020-02 and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017.ASU 2020-03 to provide additional guidance on the credit losses standard. Adoption of the ASUASUs is on a modified retrospective.retrospective basis. We early adopted the ASUASUs on January 1, 2017. Our adoption2020. The ASUs did not have a material impact on theour consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement2016-13 applies to all financial assets including loans, trade receivables and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The adoption of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash, which requires entitiesthis ASU did not have any impact except on MyPower customer notes receivable. Refer to present the aggregate changes in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, the statement of cash flows will be required to present restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents as a part of the beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents. The ASU is effectiveMyPower Customer Notes Receivable above for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Adoption of the ASU is retrospective. We will adopt the ASU on January 1, 2018, which will result in restricted cash being combined with unrestricted cash reconciling beginning and ending balances.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business, to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of assisting entities with evaluating whether transactions should be


accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Adoption of the ASU is prospective. We will adopt the ASU on January 1, 2018, which we anticipate will result in more transactions being accounted for as asset acquisitions rather than business acquisitions.further details.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,, to simplify the test for goodwill impairment by removing Step 2. An entity will, therefore, perform the goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. We adopted the ASU prospectively on January 1, 2020. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Adoption of the ASU is prospective. Wedid not have not yet selected an adoption date, and the ASU currently has an undetermineda material impact on theour consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Scope of Modification2018-15, Customer’s Accounting, to provide guidance on which changes to the terms or conditions of for Implementation Costs Incurred in a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting.Cloud Computing Arrangement that Is a Service Contract. The ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is effectivea service contract with the requirements for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Adoption ofcapitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). We adopted the ASU is prospective. We will adopt the ASUprospectively on January 1, 2018, which will2020. The ASU did not have noa material impact on theour consolidated financial statements upon adoption.statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, to simplify the application of current hedge accounting guidance. The ASU expands and refines hedge accounting for both non-financial and financial risk components and aligns the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of the ASU is generally modified retrospective. We are currently obtaining an understanding of the ASU and plan to adopt the ASU on January 1, 2019.

 

Note 3 – Business Combinations

GrohmannFor the year ended December 31, 2020, we completed various acquisitions for which consideration was immaterial on an individual basis and in aggregate.

Maxwell Acquisition

On January 3, 2017,May 16, 2019 (the “Acquisition Date”), we completed our strategic acquisition of Grohmann Engineering GmbH (now Tesla Grohmann Automation GmbH or “Grohmann”Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (“Maxwell”), which specializes inan energy storage and power delivery products company, for its complementary technology and workforce. Pursuant to the design, developmentrelated Agreement and salePlan of automated manufacturing systems, for $109.5 million in cash. We acquired Grohmann to improve the speedMerger, each issued and efficiencyoutstanding share of Maxwell common stock was converted into 0.0965 (the “Exchange Ratio”) shares of our manufacturing processes.common stock, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. In addition, Maxwell’s stock option awards and restricted stock unit awards were assumed by us and converted into corresponding equity awards in respect of our common stock based on the Exchange Ratio, with the awards retaining the same vesting and other terms and conditions as in effect immediately prior to the acquisition.

AtFair Value of Purchase Consideration

The Acquisition Date fair value of the timepurchase consideration was $207 million (as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split, 4,514,840 shares issued at $45.90 per share, the opening price of acquisition, we entered into an incentive compensation arrangement for up to a maximum of $25.8 million of payments contingent upon continued service with us for 36 months afterour common stock on the acquisition date. Such payments would have been accounted for as compensation expense in the periods earned. However, during the three months ended March 31, 2017, we terminated the incentive compensation arrangement and accelerated the payments thereunder. As a result, we recorded the entire $25.8 million as compensation expense in the three months ended March 31, 2017, which was included within selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.Acquisition Date).

Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

We accounted for the acquisition using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations under ASC 805, Business Combinations. The total purchase price was allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the Acquisition Date.  

Fair value estimates are based on a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. The judgments used to determine the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives and the expected future cash flows and related discount rates, can materialitymaterially impact our results of operations.consolidated financial statements. Significant inputs used for the model included the amount of cash flows, the expected period of the cash flows and the discount rates. During


The allocation of the fourth quarter of 2017, we finalized ourpurchase price was based on management’s estimate of the acquisition dateAcquisition Date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Prior to finalization, there were no changes to the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed.


The allocation of the purchase consideration was based on management’s estimate of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

Assets acquired:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

334

 

 

$

32

 

Accounts receivable

 

42,947

 

 

 

24

 

Inventory

 

10,031

 

 

 

32

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

44,030

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

27

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

10

 

Intangible assets

 

21,723

 

 

 

105

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets, current and non-current

 

1,998

 

 

 

3

 

Total assets acquired

 

121,063

 

 

 

233

 

Liabilities assumed:

 

 

 

Liabilities and equity assumed:

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

(19,975

)

 

 

(10

)

Accrued liabilities

 

(12,403

)

Debt and capital leases, current and non-current

 

(9,220

)

Accrued liabilities and other

 

 

(28

)

Debt and finance leases, current and non-current

 

 

(44

)

Deferred revenue, current

 

 

(1

)

Other long-term liabilities

 

(10,049

)

 

 

(14

)

Total liabilities assumed

 

(51,647

)

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

(8

)

Total liabilities and equity assumed

 

 

(105

)

Net assets acquired

 

69,416

 

 

 

128

 

Goodwill

 

40,065

 

 

 

79

 

Total purchase price

$

109,481

 

 

$

207

 

 

Goodwill represented the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired and was primarily attributable to the expected synergies from potential monetization opportunities and from integrating Grohmann’sMaxwell’s technology into our automotive businesssegment as well as the acquired talent. Goodwill is not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes and is not amortized. Rather, we assess goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired, by comparing its carrying value to the reporting unit’s fair value.

Identifiable Intangible Assets Acquired

The determination of the fair valuesvalue of the identified intangible assets and their respective useful lives as of the acquisition date waswere as follows (in thousands,millions, except for estimated useful lives)life):

 

Fair Value

 

 

Useful Life

(in years)

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Useful Life

(in years)

 

Developed technology

$

12,528

 

 

 

10

 

 

$

102

 

 

 

9

 

Software

 

3,341

 

 

 

3

 

Customer relations

 

3,236

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

9

 

Trade name

 

1,775

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

10

 

Other

 

843

 

 

 

2

 

Total intangible assets

$

21,723

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

105

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grohmann’sMaxwell’s results of operations since the acquisition dateAcquisition Date have been included within the automotive segment in the consolidated statements of operations.segment. Standalone and pro forma results of operations have not been presented because they were not material to the consolidated financial statements.

SolarCity Acquisition

On November 21, 2016 (the “Acquisition Date”), we completed our acquisition of SolarCity. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), each issued and outstanding share of SolarCity common stock was converted into 0.110 (the “Exchange Ratio”) shares of our common stock. In addition, SolarCity’s stock option awards and restricted stock unit awards were assumed by us and converted into corresponding equity awards in respect of our common stock based on the Exchange Ratio, with the awards retaining the same vesting and other terms and conditions as in effect immediately prior to the acquisition.


Fair Value of Purchase Consideration

The Acquisition Date fair value of the purchase consideration was as follows (in thousands, except for share and per share amounts):

 

Total fair value of Tesla common stock

   issued (11,124,497 shares issued at $185.04 per share)

 

$

2,058,477

 

Fair value of replacement Tesla stock

   options and restricted stock units for vested SolarCity awards

 

 

87,500

 

Total purchase price

 

$

2,145,977

 

Furthermore, the assumed unvested SolarCity awards of $95.9 million are recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the remaining requisite service period. Per ASC 805, the replacement of stock options or other share-based payment awards in conjunction with a business combination represents a modification of share-based payment awards that must be accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, Stock Compensation. As a result of our issuance of replacement awards, a portion of the fair-value-based measure of the replacement awards is included in the purchase consideration. To determine the portion of the replacement awards that is part of the purchase consideration, we measured the fair value of both the replacement awards and the historical awards as of the Acquisition Date. The fair value of the replacement awards, whether vested or unvested, was included in the purchase consideration to the extent that pre-acquisition services were rendered.

Transaction costs of $21.7 million were expensed as incurred to selling, general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

Fair value estimates are based on a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties and rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. The judgments used to determine the estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as asset lives and the expected future cash flows and related discount rates, can materiality impact our results of operations. Specifically, we utilized a discounted cash flow model to value the acquired solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, as well as the noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries. Significant inputs used included the amount of cash flows, the expected period of the cash flows and the discount rates.


The allocation of the purchase consideration was based on management’s estimate of the Acquisition Date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, as follows (in thousands):

Assets acquired:

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

213,523

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

74,619

 

Inventory

 

 

191,878

 

Solar energy systems, leased and to be leased

 

 

5,781,496

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

1,056,312

 

MyPower customer notes receivable, net of current portion

 

 

498,141

 

Restricted cash

 

 

129,196

 

Intangible assets

 

 

356,510

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets, current and non-current

 

 

199,864

 

Total assets acquired

 

 

8,501,539

 

Liabilities assumed:

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

 

(230,078

)

Accrued liabilities

 

 

(284,765

)

Debt and capital leases, current and non-current

 

 

(3,403,840

)

Financing obligations

 

 

(121,290

)

Deferred revenue, current and non-current

 

 

(271,128

)

Other liabilities

 

 

(950,423

)

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

(5,261,524

)

Net assets acquired

 

 

3,240,015

 

Noncontrolling interests redeemable and non-redeemable

 

 

(1,066,517

)

Capped call options associated with 2014 convertible notes

 

 

3,460

 

Total net assets acquired

 

 

2,176,958

 

Gain on acquisition

 

 

(30,981

)

Total purchase price

 

$

2,145,977

 

Gain on Acquisition

Since the fair value of the net assets acquired was greater than the purchase price, we recognized a gain on acquisition of $88.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2016, which was recorded within other income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of operations.Other 2019 Acquisitions

During the fourth quarter of 2017, we finalized our estimate of the Acquisition Date fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Prior to finalization, during the year ended December 31, 2017, 2019, we recorded an $11.6completed various other acquisitions generally for the related technology and workforce. Total consideration for these acquisitions was $96 million, measurement period adjustmentof which $80 million was paid in cash. In aggregate, $36 million was attributed to MyPower customer notes receivable,intangible assets, $51 million was attributed to goodwill within the automotive segment, and $9 million was attributed to net assets assumed. Goodwill is not deductible for U.S. income tax purposes. The identifiable intangible assets were related to purchased technology, with estimated useful lives of current portion,one to nine years.

Standalone and a $46.2 million measurement period adjustment to accrued liabilities. The measurement period adjustments were recorded as losses to other income (expense), net, in the consolidated statementpro forma results of operations and reducedhave not been presented because they were not material to the gain on acquisition initially recognized in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Identifiable Intangible Assets Acquired

The determination of the fair values of the identified intangible assets and their respective useful lives as of the Acquisition Date was as follows (in thousands, except for useful lives):

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Useful Life

(in years)

 

Developed technology

 

$

113,361

 

 

 

7

 

Trade name

 

 

43,500

 

 

 

3

 

Favorable contracts and leases, net

 

 

112,817

 

 

 

15

 

IPR&D

 

 

86,832

 

 

Not applicable

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

356,510

 

 

 

 

 


Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The consolidated financial statements, for the year ended December 31, 2016 include SolarCity’s results of operations from the Acquisition Date through December 31, 2016. Net revenues and operating loss attributable to SolarCity during this period and includedeither individually or in the consolidated statement of operations were $84.1 million and $68.2 million, respectively.aggregate.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information gives effect to our acquisition of SolarCity as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2015 (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

Year Ended December 31

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

7,536,876

 

 

$

4,354,324

 

Net loss attributable to common

   stockholders

 

$

(702,868

)

 

$

(1,017,223

)

Net loss per share of common stock,

   basic and diluted

 

$

(4.56

)

 

$

(7.30

)

Weighted-average shares used in

   computing net loss per share of

   common stock, basic and diluted

 

 

154,090

 

 

 

139,327

 

The unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for the depreciation of solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, the intangible assets acquired, the effect of the acquisition on deferred revenue and noncontrolling interests and the transaction costs related to the acquisition. The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations of future periods. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not give effect to the potential impact of current financial conditions, regulatory matters, synergies, operating efficiencies or cost savings that might be associated with the acquisition. Consequently, actual results could differ from the unaudited pro forma financial information presented.

 

Note 4 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill increased to $60.2$9 million within the automotive segment from $198 million as of December 31, 20172019 to $207 million as of December 31, 2020 due to our acquisitionscompleted business combinations and the impact of foreign currency translation adjustments.adjustments during the year ended December 31, 2020. There were 0 accumulated impairment losses as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.


Information regarding our acquired intangible assets including assets recognized from our acquisitions was as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

  

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

Gross Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Other

 

 

Net Carrying

Amount

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Net Carrying Amount

 

Finite-lived intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed technology

 

$

125,889

 

 

$

(19,317

)

 

$

1,847

 

 

$

108,419

 

 

$

113,361

 

 

$

(1,740

)

 

$

111,621

 

Trade name

 

 

45,275

 

 

 

(10,924

)

 

 

261

 

 

 

34,612

 

 

 

43,500

 

 

 

(967

)

 

 

42,533

 

Favorable contracts and leases, net

 

 

112,817

 

 

 

(8,639

)

 

 

 

 

 

104,178

 

 

 

112,817

 

 

 

(864

)

 

 

111,953

 

Other

 

 

34,099

 

 

 

(7,775

)

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

27,461

 

 

 

26,679

 

 

 

(3,473

)

 

 

23,206

 

Total finite-lived intangible assets

 

 

318,080

 

 

 

(46,655

)

 

 

3,245

 

 

 

274,670

 

 

 

296,357

 

 

 

(7,044

)

 

 

289,313

 

Indefinite-lived intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IPR&D

 

 

86,832

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,832

 

 

 

86,832

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,832

 

Total indefinite-lived

   intangible assets

 

 

86,832

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,832

 

 

 

86,832

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,832

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

404,912

 

 

$

(46,655

)

 

$

3,245

 

 

$

361,502

 

 

$

383,189

 

 

$

(7,044

)

 

$

376,145

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Gross Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Other

 

 

Net Carrying

Amount

 

 

Gross Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Other

 

 

Net Carrying

Amount

 

Finite-lived

   intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed technology

 

$

302

 

 

$

(111

)

 

$

3

 

 

$

194

 

 

$

291

 

 

$

(72

)

 

$

1

 

 

$

220

 

Trade names

 

 

3

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

3

 

Favorable contracts and

   leases, net

 

 

113

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

(24

)

 

 

 

 

 

89

 

Other

 

 

38

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

(16

)

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

Total finite-lived

   intangible assets

 

 

456

 

 

 

(162

)

 

 

4

 

 

 

298

 

 

 

445

 

 

 

(113

)

 

 

2

 

 

 

334

 

Indefinite-lived

   intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gigafactory Nevada

   water rights

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

In-process research

   and development

   ("IPR&D")

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

(60

)

 

 

 

Total infinite-lived

   intangible assets

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

 

 

 

(60

)

 

 

5

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

471

 

 

$

(162

)

 

$

4

 

 

$

313

 

 

$

510

 

 

$

(113

)

 

$

(58

)

 

$

339

 

 


The in-process researchAmortization expense during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and development (“IPR&D”), which we acquired from SolarCity, is accounted for as an indefinite-lived asset until the completion or abandonment of the associated research2018 was $51 million, $44 million and development efforts. If the research and development efforts are successfully completed and commercial feasibility is reached, the IPR&D would be amortized over its then estimated useful life. If the research and development efforts are not completed or are abandoned, the IPR&D might be impaired. The fair value of the IPR&D was estimated using the replacement cost method under the cost approach, based on the historical acquisition costs and expenses of the technology adjusted for estimated developer’s profit, opportunity cost and obsolescence factor. We expect to complete the research and development efforts in the first half of 2018, but there can be no assurance that the commercial feasibility will be achieved. The nature of the research and development efforts consists principally of planning, designing and testing the technology for viability in manufacturing solar cells and modules. If commercial feasibility is not achieved, we would likely look to other alternative technologies.$66 million, respectively.

Total future amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets was estimated as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

2018

 

$

46,897

 

2019

 

 

44,706

 

2020

 

 

27,284

 

2021

 

 

27,284

 

 

$

51

 

2022

 

 

27,282

 

 

 

50

 

2023

 

 

44

 

2024

 

 

29

 

2025

 

 

29

 

Thereafter

 

 

101,217

 

 

 

95

 

Total

 

$

274,670

 

 

$

298

 

 

Note 5 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, states that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. The three-tiered fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes which inputs should be used in measuring fair value, is comprised of: (Level I) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level II) inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly and (Level III) unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data. The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available in determining fair value. Our assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

Money market

   funds

 

$

2,163,459

 

 

$

2,163,459

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,226,322

 

 

$

2,226,322

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Interest rate swaps,

   net

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,490

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

2,163,518

 

 

$

2,163,459

 

 

$

59

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,227,812

 

 

$

2,226,322

 

 

$

1,490

 

 

$

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

Money market funds (cash and

   cash equivalents)

 

$

13,847

 

 

$

13,847

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,632

 

 

$

1,632

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Interest rate swap assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap liabilities

 

 

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

 

Total

 

$

13,905

 

 

$

13,847

 

 

$

58

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,606

 

 

$

1,632

 

 

$

(26

)

 

$

 

 


All of our cash equivalentsmoney market funds were classified within Level I of the fair value hierarchy because they were valued using quoted prices in active markets. Our interest rate swaps were classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy because they were valued using alternative pricing sources or models that utilized market observable inputs, including current and forward interest rates. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no transfers between the levels of the fair value hierarchy.

Cash Flow Hedges

In November 2015, we implemented a program to hedge the foreign currency exposure risk related to certain forecasted inventory purchases denominated in Japanese yen. The derivative instruments that we used were foreign currency forward contracts, which were designated as cash flow hedges with maturity dates of 12 months or less. We did not enter into any derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes.


We documented each hedging relationship and assessed its initial effectiveness on each inception date. We measured its subsequent effectiveness on a quarterly basis using regression analysis. During the term of each effective hedge contract, we recorded gains and losses to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We reclassified these gains and losses to cost of automotive sales revenue when the related finished goods inventory was sold or to cost of automotive leasing revenue over the depreciation period when the related finished goods inventory was leased. All of our hedge contracts were effective, and we recorded no amounts related to hedge ineffectiveness during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

No hedge contracts were outstanding as of December 31, 2016 or thereafter. The net gain of $5.6 million in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2016 was fully reclassified to the consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we reclassified $44.9 million of net gains from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the consolidated statement of operations. No amounts were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Interest Rate Swaps

We enter into fixed-for-floating interest rate swap agreements to swap variable interest payments on certain debt for fixed interest payments, as required by certain of our lenders. We do not designate our interest rate swaps as hedging instruments. Accordingly, our interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets within other non-current assets or other long-term liabilities, with any changes in their fair values recognized as other (expense) income, (expense), net, in the consolidated statements of operations and with any cash flows recognized as investingoperating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate notional amount of our interest rate swaps, their gross asset at fair value and their gross liability at fair value were $789.6 million, $10.6 million and $12.1 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized $7.0 million of gains related to our interest rate swaps. Our interest rate swaps outstanding were as follows as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands)millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate Notional

Amount

 

 

Gross Asset at Fair

Value

 

 

Gross Liability at

Fair Value

 

 

Gross Gains

 

 

Gross Losses

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

496,544

 

 

$

5,304

 

 

$

5,245

 

 

$

7,192

 

 

$

13,082

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Aggregate Notional

Amount

 

 

Gross Asset at

Fair Value

 

 

Gross Liability at

Fair Value

 

 

Aggregate Notional

Amount

 

 

Gross Asset at

Fair Value

 

 

Gross Liability at

Fair Value

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

554

 

 

$

 

 

$

58

 

 

$

821

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

27

 

Our interest rate swaps activity was as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Gross losses

 

$

42

 

 

$

51

 

 

$

12

 

Gross gains

 

$

6

 

 

$

11

 

 

$

22

 

Disclosure of Fair Values

Our financial instruments that are not re-measured at fair value include accounts receivable, MyPower customer notes receivable, rebates receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, customer deposits convertible senior notes, the 5.30% Senior Notes due in 2025, the participation interest, solar asset-backed notes, solar loan-backed notes, Solar Bonds and long-term debt. The carrying values of these financial instruments other than the convertible senior notes, theour 2021 Notes, 2022 Notes, 2024 Notes, our subsidiary’s NaN-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due in 2020 and our subsidiary’s 5.50% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2022 (collectively referred to as “Convertible Senior Notes” below), 5.30% Senior Notes due in 2025 the participation interest, the(“2025 Notes”), solar asset-backed notes and the solar loan-backed notes approximate their fair values.

We estimate the fair value of the convertible senior notesConvertible Senior Notes and the 5.30% Senior2025 Notes due in 2025 using commonly accepted valuation methodologies and market-based risk measurements that are indirectly observable, such as credit risk (Level II). In addition, we estimate the fair valuevalues of the participation interest, theour solar asset-backed notes and the solar loan-backed notes based on rates currently offered for instruments with similar maturities and terms (Level III). The following table presents the estimated fair values and the carrying values (in thousands)millions):

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

Carrying Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Carrying Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

Convertible senior notes

 

$

3,722,673

 

 

$

4,488,651

 

 

$

2,957,288

 

 

$

3,205,641

 

Senior notes

 

$

1,775,550

 

 

$

1,732,500

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Participation interest

 

$

17,545

 

 

$

17,042

 

 

$

16,713

 

 

$

15,025

 

Solar asset-backed notes

 

$

880,415

 

 

$

898,145

 

 

$

442,764

 

 

$

428,551

 

Solar loan-backed notes

 

$

236,844

 

 

$

248,149

 

 

$

137,024

 

 

$

132,129

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Carrying Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Carrying Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

Convertible Senior Notes

 

$

1,971

 

 

$

24,596

 

 

$

3,729

 

 

$

6,110

 

2025 Notes

 

$

1,785

 

 

$

1,877

 

 

$

1,782

 

 

$

1,748

 

Solar asset-backed notes

 

$

1,115

 

 

$

1,137

 

 

$

1,155

 

 

$

1,211

 

Solar loan-backed notes

 

$

146

 

 

$

152

 

 

$

175

 

 

$

189

 

 


 

Note 6 – Inventory

Our inventory consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Raw materials

 

$

821,396

 

 

$

680,339

 

 

$

1,508

 

 

$

1,428

 

Work in process

 

 

243,181

 

 

 

233,746

 

 

 

493

 

 

 

362

 

Finished goods(1)

 

 

1,013,909

 

 

 

1,016,731

 

 

 

1,666

 

 

 

1,356

 

Service parts

 

 

185,051

 

 

 

136,638

 

 

 

434

 

 

 

406

 

Total

 

$

2,263,537

 

 

$

2,067,454

 

 

$

4,101

 

 

$

3,552

 

Finished goods inventory included vehicles in transit to fulfill customer orders, new vehicles available for immediate sale at our retail and service center locations, used Tesla vehicles and energy storage products.

(1)

Finished goods inventory includes vehicles in transit to fulfill customer orders, new vehicles available for sale, used vehicles, energy storage products and Solar Roof products available for sale.


For solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, we commence transferring component parts from inventory to construction in progress, a component of solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, once a lease or PPA contract with a customer has been executed and installation has been initiated. Additional costs incurred on the leased solar energy systems, including labor and overhead, are recorded within construction in progress.solar energy systems under construction.

We write-down inventory for any excess or obsolete inventories or when we believe that the net realizable value of inventories is less than the carrying value. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, we recorded write-downs of $124.1$145 million, $52.8$138 million and $44.9$78 million, respectively, in cost of revenues.

 

 

Note 7 – Solar Energy Systems, Leased and To Be Leased, Net

Solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net, consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Solar energy systems leased to customers

 

$

6,009,977

 

 

$

5,052,976

 

Solar energy systems in service

 

$

6,758

 

 

$

6,682

 

Initial direct costs related to customer solar energy

system lease acquisition costs

 

 

74,709

 

 

 

12,774

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

6,084,686

 

 

 

5,065,750

 

 

 

6,861

 

 

 

6,784

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization(1)

 

 

(220,110

)

 

 

(20,157

)

 

 

(955

)

 

 

(723

)

 

 

5,864,576

 

 

 

5,045,593

 

 

 

5,906

 

 

 

6,061

 

Solar energy systems under construction

 

 

243,847

 

 

 

460,913

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

18

 

Solar energy systems to be leased to customers

 

 

239,067

 

 

 

413,374

 

Solar energy systems, leased and to be leased – net (1)

 

$

6,347,490

 

 

$

5,919,880

 

Solar energy systems pending interconnection

 

 

45

 

 

 

59

 

Solar energy systems, net (2)

 

$

5,979

 

 

$

6,138

 

(1)

Included inDepreciation and amortization expense during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $232 million, $227 million and $276 million, respectively.

(2)

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, asnet, included $36 million of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $36.0 million and $36.0 million, respectively, related to capitalgross finance leased assets with an accumulated depreciation and amortization of $1.9$7 million and $0.2$6 million, respectively.

 

 


Note 8 – Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Our property, plant and equipment, net, consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Machinery, equipment, vehicles and office furniture

 

$

4,251,711

 

 

$

2,154,367

 

 

$

8,493

 

 

$

7,167

 

Tooling

 

 

1,255,952

 

 

 

794,793

 

 

 

1,811

 

 

 

1,493

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

789,751

 

 

 

505,295

 

 

 

1,421

 

 

 

1,087

 

Land and buildings

 

 

2,517,247

 

 

 

1,079,452

 

 

 

3,662

 

 

 

3,024

 

Computer equipment, hardware and software

 

 

395,067

 

 

 

275,655

 

 

 

856

 

 

 

595

 

Construction in progress

 

 

2,541,588

 

 

 

2,147,332

 

 

 

1,621

 

 

 

764

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

23,548

 

 

 

11,751,316

 

 

 

6,980,442

 

 

 

17,864

 

 

 

14,130

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(1,723,794

)

 

 

(997,485

)

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(5,117

)

 

 

(3,734

)

Total

 

$

10,027,522

 

 

$

5,982,957

 

 

$

12,747

 

 

$

10,396

 

 

Construction in progress is primarily comprised of toolingconstruction of Gigafactory Berlin and Gigafactory Texas, expansion of Gigafactory Shanghai and equipment and tooling related to the manufacturing of our vehicles and a portion ofproducts. We are currently constructing Gigafactory 1 construction. In addition, construction in progress also included certain build-to-suit lease costs incurred at our Buffalo manufacturing facility, referred to as Gigafactory 2.Berlin under conditional permits. Completed assets are transferred to their respective asset classes, and depreciation begins when an asset is ready for its intended use. Interest on outstanding debt is capitalized during periods of significant capital asset construction and amortized over the useful lives of the related assets. During the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we capitalized $124.9$48 million and $46.7$31 million, respectively, of interest.

As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the table above included $1.63 billion and $1.32 billion, respectively, of build-to-suit lease assets. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the corresponding financing liabilities of $14.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively, were recorded in accrued liabilities and $1.67 billion and $1.32 billion, respectively, were recorded in other long-term liabilities.

Depreciation and amortization expense during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was $769.3 million, $477.3 million$1.57 billion, $1.37 billion and $278.7 million,$1.11 billion, respectively. Gross property, plant and equipment under capitalfinance leases as of December 31, 20172020 and 2019 was $2.28 billion and $2.08 billion, respectively, with accumulated depreciation of $816 million and $483 million, respectively.


Panasonic has partnered with us on Gigafactory Nevada with investments in the production equipment that it uses to manufacture and supply us with battery cells. Under our arrangement with Panasonic, we plan to purchase the full output from their production equipment at negotiated prices. As the terms of the arrangement convey a finance lease under ASC 842, Leases, we account for their production equipment as leased assets when production commences. We account for each lease and any non-lease components associated with that lease as a single lease component for all asset classes, except production equipment classes embedded in supply agreements. This results in us recording the cost of their production equipment within property, plant and equipment, net, on the consolidated balance sheets with a corresponding liability recorded to debt and finance leases. Depreciation on Panasonic production equipment is computed using the units-of-production method whereby capitalized costs are amortized over the total estimated productive life of the respective assets. As of December 31, 2016 was $688.3 million2020 and $112.6 million, respectively. Accumulated depreciation on property and equipment under capital leases as of these dates was $100.6 million and $40.2 million, respectively.

We2019, we had cumulatively capitalized costs of $3.15$1.77 billion and $1.04$1.73 billion, respectively, for on the consolidated balance sheets in relation to the production equipment under our Panasonic arrangement.

In 2019, the Shanghai government agreed to provide $85 million of certain incentives in connection with us making certain manufacturing equipment investments at Gigafactory 1 asShanghai, of December 31, 2017which $46 million was received in cash and December 31, 2016.

Note 9 – Non-cancellable Operating Lease Payments Receivable

Asthe remaining $39 million was in the form of December 31, 2017, future minimum lease payments to be received from customers under non-cancellable operating leases for each of the next five yearsassets and thereafter were as follows (in thousands):

2018

 

$

387,343

 

2019

 

 

328,490

 

2020

 

 

242,683

 

2021

 

 

177,123

 

2022

 

 

176,752

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,492,490

 

Total

 

$

3,804,881

 


The above table does not include vehicle sales to customers or leasing partners with a resale value guarantee as the cash payments were received upfront. In addition, we assumed through our acquisition of SolarCity and will continue to enter into power purchase agreements with our customers that are accounted for as leases. These customers are charged solely based on actual power producedservices contributed by the installed solar energy systemgovernment. In 2020, the Shanghai government agreed to provide an additional $122 million of such incentives. Of the total incentives provided between both years, $123 million was received in cash in 2020. Proceeds from the grant must be spent on qualified capital investments at a predefined rate per kilowatt-hour of power produced. The future payments from such arrangements are not includedGigafactory Shanghai as stipulated in the above tableagreement. These incentives were taken as theya reduction to property, plant and equipment, net, on the consolidated balance sheets and cash receipts are a functionreflected as investing cash inflows on the consolidated statements of the power generated by the related solar energy systems in the future. Furthermore, the above table does not include performance-based incentives receivable from various utility companies. The amount of contingent rentals recognized as revenue for the years presented were not material.cash flows.

 

 

Note 10 -9 – Accrued Liabilities and Other

 

As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Accrued purchases(1)

 

$

753,408

 

 

$

585,019

 

 

$

901

 

 

$

638

 

Taxes payable (2)

 

 

777

 

 

 

611

 

Payroll and related costs

 

 

378,284

 

 

 

218,792

 

 

 

654

 

 

 

466

 

Taxes payable

 

 

185,807

 

 

 

152,897

 

Financing obligation, current portion

 

 

67,313

 

 

 

52,031

 

Accrued warranty

 

 

125,502

 

 

 

116,797

 

Accrued warranty reserve, current portion

 

 

479

 

 

 

344

 

Sales return reserve, current portion

 

 

417

 

 

 

272

 

Operating lease liabilities, current portion

 

 

286

 

 

 

228

 

Accrued interest

 

 

77

 

 

 

86

 

Resale value guarantees, current portion

 

 

23

 

 

 

317

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

221,052

 

 

 

84,492

 

 

 

241

 

 

 

260

 

Total

 

$

1,731,366

 

 

$

1,210,028

 

 

$

3,855

 

 

$

3,222

 

 

Taxes payable included value added tax, sales tax, property tax, use tax

(1)

Accrued purchases primarily reflects receipts of goods and income tax payables.

Accrued purchases reflected primarily liabilities related to the construction of Gigafactory 1, along with engineering design and testing accruals. As these services that we had not been invoiced yet. As we are invoiced for these goods and services, this balance will reduce and accounts payable will increase.

(2)

Taxes payable includes value added tax, sales tax, property tax, use tax and income tax payables.

 

 

Note 1110 – Other Long-Term Liabilities

OtherAs of December 31, 2020 and 2019, other long-term liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):

 

  

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

Accrued warranty reserve, net of current portion

 

$

276,289

 

 

$

149,858

 

Build-to-suit lease liability, net of current portion

 

 

1,665,768

 

 

 

1,323,293

 

Deferred rent expense

 

 

46,820

 

 

 

36,966

 

Financing obligation, net of current portion

 

 

67,929

 

 

 

84,360

 

Liability for receipts from an investor

 

 

29,713

 

 

 

76,828

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

 

356,451

 

 

 

220,144

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

$

2,442,970

 

 

$

1,891,449

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

$

1,254

 

 

$

956

 

Accrued warranty reserve

 

 

989

 

 

 

745

 

Sales return reserve

 

 

500

 

 

 

545

 

Deferred tax liability

 

 

151

 

 

 

66

 

Resale value guarantees

 

 

19

 

 

 

36

 

Other non-current liabilities

 

 

417

 

 

 

343

 

Total other long-term liabilities

 

$

3,330

 

 

$

2,691

 

 

The liability for receipts from an investor represents the amounts received from the investor under a lease pass-through fund arrangement for the monetization of ITCs for solar energy systems not yet placed in service.


Note 1211 – Customer Deposits

Customer deposits primarily consisted of cash payments from customers at the time they place an order or reservation for a vehicle or an energy product and any additional payments up to the point of delivery or the completion of installation, including the fair values of any customer trade-in vehicles that are applicable toward a new vehicle purchase. Customer deposits also include prepayments on contracts that can be cancelled without significant penalties, such as vehicle maintenance plans. Customer deposit amounts and timing vary depending on the vehicle model, the energy product and the country of delivery. Customer deposits are fully refundable; inIn the case of a vehicle, up to the point the vehicle is placed into the production cycle, and incustomer deposits are fully refundable. In the case of an energy generation or storage product, customer deposits are fully refundable prior to the entry into a purchase agreement or in certain cases for a limited time thereafter (in accordance with applicable


laws). Customer deposits are included in current liabilities until refunded or until they are applied towards the customer’s purchase balance. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we held $853.9 million and $663.9 million, respectively, in customer deposits.

 

Note 1312Convertible and Long-Term Debt Obligations

The following is a summary of our debt and finance leases as of December 31, 20172020 (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Unpaid

 

 

 

 

 

Unused

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

Net Carrying Value

 

 

Committed

 

 

Contractual

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

 

 

Current

 

 

Long-Term

 

 

Amount

 

 

Interest Rates

 

 

Maturity Date

Recourse debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018

   ("2018 Notes")

 

$

5,512

 

 

$

5,442

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

1.50

%

 

June 2018

0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2019

   ("2019 Notes")

 

 

920,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

869,092

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.25

%

 

March 2019

1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2021

   ("2021 Notes")

 

 

1,380,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,186,131

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.25

%

 

March 2021

2.375% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2022

   ("2022 Notes")

 

 

977,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

841,973

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.375

%

 

March 2022

5.30% Senior Notes due in 2025

   ("2025 Notes")

 

 

1,800,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,775,550

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.30

%

 

August 2025

Credit Agreement

 

 

1,109,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,109,000

 

 

 

729,929

 

 

1% plus LIBOR

 

 

June 2020

Vehicle and other Loans

 

 

16,205

 

 

 

15,944

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

 

 

1.8%-7.6%

 

 

January 2018-

September 2019

2.75% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018

 

 

230,000

 

 

 

222,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.75

%

 

November 2018

1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2019

 

 

566,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

511,389

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.625

%

 

November 2019

Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due in 2020

 

 

103,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,475

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

December 2020

Related Party Promissory Notes due in February 2018

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.5

%

 

February 2018

Solar Bonds

 

 

32,016

 

 

 

7,008

 

 

 

24,940

 

 

 

 

 

2.6%-5.8%

 

 

March 2018-

January 2031

Total recourse debt

 

 

7,239,233

 

 

 

350,565

 

 

 

6,404,811

 

 

 

729,929

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-recourse debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warehouse Agreements

 

 

673,811

 

 

 

195,382

 

 

 

477,867

 

 

 

426,189

 

 

 

3.1

%

 

September 2019

Canada Credit Facility

 

 

86,708

 

 

 

31,106

 

 

 

55,603

 

 

 

 

 

3.6%-5.1%

 

 

November 2021

Term Loan due in December 2018

 

 

157,095

 

 

 

156,884

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,534

 

 

 

4.8

%

 

December 2018

Term Loan due in January 2021

 

 

176,290

 

 

 

5,885

 

 

 

169,352

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.9

%

 

January 2021

Revolving Aggregation Credit Facility

 

 

161,796

 

 

 

 

 

 

158,733

 

 

 

438,204

 

 

4.1%-4.5%

 

 

December 2019

Solar Renewable Energy Credit Loan Facility

 

 

38,575

 

 

 

15,858

 

 

 

22,774

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.3

%

 

July 2021

Cash equity debt

 

 

482,133

 

 

 

12,334

 

 

 

454,421

 

 

 

 

 

5.3%-5.8%

 

 

July 2033-

January 2035

Solar asset-backed notes

 

 

907,241

 

 

 

23,829

 

 

 

856,586

 

 

 

 

 

4.0%-7.7%

 

 

November 2038-

February 2048

Solar loan-backed notes

 

 

244,498

 

 

 

8,006

 

 

 

228,838

 

 

 

 

 

4.8%-7.5%

 

 

September 2048-

September 2049

Total non-recourse debt

 

 

2,928,147

 

 

 

449,284

 

 

 

2,424,174

 

 

 

883,927

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

$

10,167,380

 

 

$

799,849

 

 

$

8,828,985

 

 

$

1,613,856

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unpaid

 

 

Unused

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Carrying Value

 

 

Principal

 

 

Committed

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Current

 

 

Long-Term

 

 

Balance

 

 

Amount (1)

 

 

Interest Rates

 

 

Maturity Date

Recourse debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Notes

 

$

419

 

 

 

 

 

 

422

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.25

%

 

March 2021

2022 Notes

 

 

115

 

 

 

366

 

 

 

503

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.375

%

 

March 2022

2024 Notes

 

 

171

 

 

 

856

 

 

 

1,282

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.00

%

 

May 2024

2025 Notes

 

 

 

 

 

1,785

 

 

 

1,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.30

%

 

August 2025

Credit Agreement

 

 

 

 

 

1,895

 

 

 

1,895

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

3.3

%

 

July 2023

Solar Bonds and other Loans

 

 

4

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.6%-5.8

%

 

January 2021 - January 2031

Total recourse debt

 

 

709

 

 

 

4,951

 

 

 

5,957

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-recourse debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Automotive Asset-backed Notes

 

 

777

 

 

 

921

 

 

 

1,705

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6%-7.9

%

 

August 2021-August 2024

Solar Asset-backed Notes

 

 

39

 

 

 

1,076

 

 

 

1,141

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.0%-7.7

%

 

September 2024-February 2048

China Loan Agreements

 

 

 

 

 

616

 

 

 

616

 

 

 

1,372

 

 

 

4.0

%

 

June 2021-December 2024

Cash Equity Debt

 

 

18

 

 

 

408

 

 

 

439

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.3%-5.8

%

 

July 2033-January 2035

Solar Loan-backed Notes

 

 

13

 

 

 

133

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.8%-7.5

%

 

September 2048-September 2049

Warehouse Agreements

 

 

37

 

 

 

257

 

 

 

294

 

 

 

806

 

 

 

1.7%-1.8

%

 

September 2022

Solar Term Loan

 

 

151

 

 

 

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.7

%

 

January 2021

Automotive Lease-backed Credit Facilities

 

 

14

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

153

 

 

 

1.9%-5.9

%

 

September 2022-November 2022

Solar Revolving Credit Facility and

   other Loans

 

 

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

81

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

2.7%-5.1

%

 

June 2022-February 2033

Total non-recourse debt

 

 

1,049

 

 

 

3,511

 

 

 

4,612

 

 

 

2,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

 

1,758

 

 

 

8,462

 

 

$

10,569

 

 

$

2,632

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance leases

 

 

374

 

 

 

1,094

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt and finance leases

 

$

2,132

 

 

$

9,556

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The following is a summary of our debt and finance leases as of December 31, 20162019 (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Unpaid

 

 

 

 

 

Unused

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

Net Carrying Value

 

 

Committed

 

 

Contractual

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

 

 

Current

 

 

Long-Term

 

 

Amount

 

 

Interest Rates

 

 

Maturity Date

Recourse debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018 Notes

 

$

205,013

 

 

$

196,229

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

1.50

%

 

June 2018

2019 Notes

 

 

920,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

827,620

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.25

%

 

March 2019

2021 Notes

 

 

1,380,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,132,029

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.25

%

 

March 2021

Credit Agreement

 

 

969,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

969,000

 

 

 

181,000

 

 

1% plus LIBOR

 

 

June 2020

Secured Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

364,000

 

 

 

366,247

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,305

 

 

4.0%-6.0%

 

 

January 2017-

December 2017

Vehicle and other Loans

 

 

23,771

 

 

 

17,235

 

 

 

6,536

 

 

 

 

 

2.9%-7.6%

 

 

March 2017-

June 2019

2.75% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018

 

 

230,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

212,223

 

 

 

 

 

2.75%

 

 

November 2018

1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2019

 

 

566,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

483,820

 

 

 

 

 

1.625%

 

 

November 2019

Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due in 2020

 

 

113,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

89,418

 

 

 

 

 

0.0%

 

 

December 2020

Solar Bonds

 

 

332,060

 

 

 

181,582

 

 

 

148,948

 

 

#

 

 

1.1%-6.5%

 

 

January 2017-

January 2031

Total recourse debt

 

 

5,102,844

 

 

 

761,293

 

 

 

3,869,594

 

 

 

205,305

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-recourse debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Warehouse Agreement

 

 

390,000

 

 

 

73,708

 

 

 

316,292

 

 

 

210,000

 

 

Various

 

 

September 2018

Canada Credit Facility

 

 

67,342

 

 

 

18,489

 

 

 

48,853

 

 

 

 

 

3.6%-4.5%

 

 

December 2020

Term Loan due in December 2017

 

 

75,467

 

 

 

75,715

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,173

 

 

4.2%

 

 

December 2017

Term Loan due in January 2021

 

 

183,388

 

 

 

5,860

 

 

 

176,169

 

 

 

 

 

4.5%

 

 

January 2021

MyPower Revolving Credit Facility

 

 

133,762

 

 

 

133,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

56,238

 

 

4.1%-6.6%

 

 

January 2017

Revolving Aggregation Credit Facility

 

 

424,757

 

 

 

 

 

 

427,944

 

 

 

335,243

 

 

4.0%-4.8%

 

 

December 2018

Solar Renewable Energy Credit Term Loan

 

 

38,124

 

 

 

12,491

 

 

 

26,262

 

 

 

 

 

6.6%-9.9%

 

 

April 2017-

July 2021

Cash equity debt

 

 

496,654

 

 

 

13,642

 

 

 

466,741

 

 

 

 

 

5.3%-5.8%

 

 

July 2033-

January 2035

Solar asset-backed notes

 

 

458,836

 

 

 

16,113

 

 

 

426,651

 

 

 

 

 

4.0%-7.5%

 

 

November 2038-

September 2046

Solar loan-backed notes

 

 

140,586

 

 

 

3,514

 

 

 

133,510

 

 

 

 

 

4.8%-6.9%

 

 

September 2048

Total non-recourse debt

 

 

2,408,916

 

 

 

353,359

 

 

 

2,022,422

 

 

 

653,654

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

$

7,511,760

 

 

$

1,114,652

 

 

$

5,892,016

 

 

$

858,959

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unpaid

 

 

 

Unused

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Carrying Value

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Committed

 

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Current

 

 

 

Long-Term

 

 

 

Balance

 

 

 

Amount (1)

 

 

 

Interest Rates

 

 

Maturity Date

Recourse debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Notes

 

$

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,304

 

 

 

$

 

1,380

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

1.25

%

 

March 2021

2022 Notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

902

 

 

 

 

 

978

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.375

%

 

March 2022

2024 Notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,383

 

 

 

 

 

1,840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.00

%

 

May 2024

2025 Notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,782

 

 

 

 

 

1,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.3

%

 

August 2025

Credit Agreement

 

 

 

141

 

 

 

 

 

1,586

 

 

 

 

 

1,727

 

 

 

 

 

499

 

 

 

 

2.7%-4.8

%

 

June 2020-July 2023

Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due in

   2020

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

December 2020

Solar Bonds and other Loans

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.6%-5.8

%

 

March 2020-January 2031

Total recourse debt

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

 

 

7,010

 

 

 

 

 

7,898

 

 

 

 

 

499

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-recourse debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Automotive Asset-backed Notes

 

 

 

573

 

 

 

 

 

997

 

 

 

 

 

1,577

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.0%-7.9

%

 

February 2020- May 2023

Solar Asset-backed Notes

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

1,123

 

 

 

 

 

1,183

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.0%-7.7

%

 

September 2024-February 2048

China Loan Agreements

 

 

 

444

 

 

 

 

 

297

 

 

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

 

 

1,542

 

 

 

 

3.7%-4.0

%

 

September 2020-December 2024

Cash Equity Debt

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

430

 

 

 

 

 

454

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.3%-5.8

%

 

July 2033-January 2035

Solar Loan-backed Notes

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

164

 

 

 

 

 

182

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.8%-7.5

%

 

September 2048-September 2049

Warehouse Agreements

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

146

 

 

 

 

 

167

 

 

 

 

 

933

 

 

 

 

3.1%-3.6

%

 

September 2021

Solar Term Loans

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

152

 

 

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.4

%

 

January 2021

Automotive Lease-backed Credit Facility

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.2%-5.9

%

 

November 2022

Solar Revolving Credit Facility and

   other Loans

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

4.5%-7.4

%

 

March 2020-June 2022

Total non-recourse debt

 

 

 

1,146

 

 

 

 

 

3,392

 

 

 

 

 

4,594

 

 

 

 

 

2,481

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

 

 

1,399

 

 

 

 

 

10,402

 

 

 

$

 

12,492

 

 

 

$

 

2,980

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance leases

 

 

 

386

 

 

 

 

 

1,232

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt and finance leases

 

$

 

1,785

 

 

 

$

 

11,634

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#(1)

OutThere are no restrictions on draw-down or use for general corporate purposes with respect to any available committed funds under our credit facilities and financing funds, except certain specified conditions prior to draw-down, including pledging to our lenders sufficient amounts of qualified receivables, inventories, leased vehicles and our interests in those leases, solar energy systems and the $350.0 million authorized toassociated customer contracts, our interests in financing funds or various other assets and as may be issued, $17.9 million remained available to be issued.further described below.

Recourse debt refers to debt that is recourse to our general assets. Non-recourse debt refers to debt that is recourse to only specified assets of our subsidiaries. The differences between the unpaid principal balances and the net carrying values are due to convertible senior note conversion features, debt discounts or deferred financing costs. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we were in material compliance with all financial debt covenants, which include minimum liquidity and expense-coverage balances and ratios.

2018 Notes, Bond Hedges and Warrant Transactions

In May 2013, we issued $660.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due in June 2018 in a public offering. The net proceeds from the issuance, after deducting transaction costs, were $648.0 million.

Each $1,000 of principal of the 2018 Notes is initially convertible into 8.0306 shares of our common stock, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $124.52 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events. Holders of the 2018 Notes may convert, at their option, on or after March 1, 2018. Further, holders of the 2018 Notes may convert, at their option, prior to March 1, 2018 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any quarter beginning after September 30, 2013, if the closing price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the last 30 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price; (2) during the five-business day period following any five-consecutive trading day period in which the trading price of the 2018 Notes is less than 98% of the product of the closing price of our common stock for each day during such five-consecutive trading day period or (3) if we make specified distributions to holders of our common stock or if specified corporate transactions occur. Upon conversion, we would pay cash for the principal amount and, if applicable, deliver shares of our common stock (subject to our right to deliver cash in lieu of all or a portion of such shares of our common stock) based on a daily conversion value. If a fundamental change occurs prior to the maturity date, holders of the 2018 Notes may require


us to repurchase all or a portion of their 2018 Notes for cash at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if specific corporate events occur prior to the maturity date, we would increase the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its 2018 Notes in connection with such an event in certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2017, at least one of the conditions permitting the holders of the 2018 Notes to early convert had been met. Therefore, the 2018 Notes were classified as current.

In accordance with GAAP relating to embedded conversion features, we initially valued and bifurcated the conversion feature associated with the 2018 Notes. We recorded to stockholders’ equity $82.8 million for the conversion feature. The resulting debt discount is being amortized to interest expense at an effective interest rate of 4.29%.

In connection with the offering of the 2018 Notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions whereby we have the option to purchase initially (subject to adjustment for certain specified events) 5.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $124.52 per share. The cost of the convertible note hedge transactions was $177.5 million. In addition, we sold warrants whereby the holders of the warrants have the option to purchase initially (subject to adjustment for certain specified events) 5.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $184.48 per share. We received $120.3 million in cash proceeds from the sale of these warrants. Taken together, the purchase of the convertible note hedges and the sale of the warrants are intended to reduce potential dilution from the conversion of the 2018 Notes and to effectively increase the overall conversion price from $124.52 to $184.48 per share. As these transactions meet certain accounting criteria, the convertible note hedges and warrants are recorded in stockholders’ equity and are not accounted for as derivatives. The net cost incurred in connection with the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

In the second quarter of 2017, $144.8 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Notes were exchanged for 1,163,442 shares of our common stock (see Note 14, Common Stock). As a result, we recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $1.1 million.

In the third quarter of 2017, $42.7 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Notes were exchanged or converted for 250,198 shares of our common stock (see Note 14, Common Stock) and $32.7 million in cash. As a result, we recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $0.3 million.

In the fourth quarter of 2017, $12.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Notes were exchanged or converted for 96,634 shares of our common stock (see Note 14, Common Stock). As a result, we recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $0.1 million.

2019 Notes, 2021 Notes, Bond Hedges and Warrant Transactions

In March 2014, we issued $800.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due in March 2019 and $1.20 billion in aggregate principal amount of 1.25% Convertible Seniorour 2021 Notes due in March 2021 in a public offering. In April 2014, we issued an additional $120.0$180 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2019 Notes and $180.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Notes,notes, pursuant to the exercise in full of the overallotment options by the underwriters. The total net proceeds from the issuances, after deducting transaction costs, were $905.8 million for$1.36 billion.

As adjusted to give effect to the 2019 Notes and $1.36 billion for the 2021 Notes.

EachStock Split, each $1,000 of principal of these notes is initiallynow convertible into 2.778813.8940 shares of our common stock, which is equivalent to an initiala conversion price of $359.87$71.97 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events. Holders of these notes mayhave been able to elect to convert on or after December 1, 2018 for the 2019 Notes and December 1, 2020 for the 2021 Notes.2020. The settlement of such an election to convert the 2019 Notes would be in cash and/or shares of our common stock, with the split at our discretion, on the maturity date. The settlement of such an election to convert the 2021 Notesoutstanding notes would be in cash for the principal amount and, if applicable, cash and/or shares of our common stock (subject tofor any conversion premium at our right to deliver cash in lieuelection. As of all or a portion of such shares of our common stock), on the maturity date. Further,December 1, 2020, holders of these notes mayhave the option to convert. Such holders also had the option to convert at their option, prior to the respective dates above onlyDecember 1, 2020 under the following circumstances: (1) during a quarter in whichcircumstances further described below.      Upon the closing price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the last 30 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price; (2) during the five-business day period following any five-consecutive trading day period in which the trading price of these notes is less than 98% of the product of the closing price of our common stock for each day during such five-consecutive trading day period or


(3) if we make specified distributions to holders of our common stock or if specified corporate transactions occur. Upon such a conversion of the 2019 Notes, we would pay or deliver (as applicable) cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof, at our election. Upon such aearly conversion of the 2021 Notes, we wouldwill pay cash for the principal amount and if applicable, deliver shares of our common stock (subject to our right to deliver cash in lieu of all or a portion of such shares of our common stock) based on a daily conversion value. If a fundamental change occurs prior to the applicable maturity date, holders of these notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their notes for cash at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if specific corporate events occur prior to the applicable maturity date, we would increase the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert their notes in connection with such an event in certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2017, none of the conditions permitting the holders of these notes to early convert had been met. Therefore, these notes were classified as long-term.

In accordance with GAAP relating to embedded conversion features, we initially valued and bifurcated the conversion features associated with these notes. We recorded to stockholders’ equity $188.1$369 million for the 2019 Notes’ conversion feature and $369.4 million for the 2021 Notes’ conversion feature. The resulting debt discounts arediscount is being amortized to interest expense at an effective interest rate of 4.89% and 5.96%, respectively..


In connection with the offering of these notes in March and April 2014, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions whereby we havehad the option to purchase initially (subject to adjustment for certain specified events) a total of 5.619.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $359.87$71.97 per share.share, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. The total cost of the convertible note hedge transactions was $524.7$398 million. In addition, we sold warrants whereby the holders of the warrants have the option to purchase initially (subject to adjustment for certain specified events) 2.219.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $512.66$112.13 per share, foras adjusted to give effect to the 2019 Notes and 3.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $560.64 per share for 2021 Notes.Stock Split. We received $338.4 million in total cash proceeds from the sales of these warrants. Similarly, in connection with the issuance of the additional notes in April 2014, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions and paid a total of $78.7 million. In addition, we sold warrants to purchase initially (subject to adjustment for certain specified events) 0.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $512.66 per share for the 2019 Notes and 0.5 million shares of our common stock at a price of $560.64 per share for the 2021 Notes. We received $50.8$257 million in total cash proceeds from the sales of these warrants. Taken together, the purchases of the convertible note hedges and the sales of the warrants are intended to reduce potential dilution and/or cash payments from the conversion of these notes and to effectively increase the overall conversion price from $359.87$71.97 to $512.66$112.13 per share, foras adjusted to give effect to the 2019 Notes and from $359.87 to $560.64 per share for the 2021 Notes.Stock Split. As these transactions meet certain accounting criteria, the convertible note hedges and warrants are recorded in stockholders’ equity and are not accounted for as derivatives. The net cost incurred in connection with the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

During each of the quarters of 2020, the closing price of our common stock exceeded 130% of the applicable conversion price of the 2021 Notes on at least 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days of the quarter, causing the 2021 Notes to be convertible by their holders during the second, third and fourth quarters of 2020. As the settlement of conversion of the 2021 Notes is in cash for the principal amount and, if applicable, cash and/or shares of our common stock for any conversion premium at our election, we reclassified $3 million, representing the difference between the aggregate principal of our 2021 Notes and the carrying value as of December 31, 2020, as mezzanine equity from permanent equity on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. The debt discounts recorded on the 2021 Notes are recognized as interest expense through March 2021 and early conversions have resulted in the acceleration of such recognition through December 31, 2020, including the losses on extinguishment of debt appearing in the Interest Expense table below.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, $958 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Notes were converted for $958 million in cash and 11.1 million shares of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. As a result, we recorded a decrease to additional paid-in capital of $6 million. The note hedges we entered into in connection with the issuance of the 2021 Notes were automatically settled with the respective conversions of the notes, resulting in the receipt of 11.1 million shares of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split.  The related warrants will settle under their terms after the maturity or settlement of the related convertible debt. The remaining notes outstanding are expected to convert in the first quarter of fiscal year 2021. As of December 31, 2020, the if-converted value of the 2021 Notes exceeds the outstanding principal amount by $3.71 billion.

2022 Notes, Bond Hedges and Warrant Transactions

In March 2017, we issued $977.5$978 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.375% Convertible Seniorour 2022 Notes due in March 2022 in a public offering. The net proceeds from the issuance, after deducting transaction costs, were $965.9$966 million.

EachAs adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split, each $1,000 of principal of the 2022 Notes is initially convertible into 3.053415.2670 shares of our common stock, which is equivalent to an initiala conversion price of $327.50$65.50 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events. Holders of the 2022 Notes may convert, at their option, on or after December 15, 2021. Further, holders of the 2022 Notes may convert, at their option, prior to December 15, 2021 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any quarter beginning after June 30, 2017, if the closing price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the last 30 consecutive trading days immediately preceding the quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price; (2) during the five-business day period following any five-consecutive5-consecutive trading day period in which the trading price of the 2022 Notes is less than 98% of the product of the closing price of our common stock and the applicable conversion rate for each day during such five-consecutive trading day period or (3) if we make specified distributions to holders of our common stock or if specified corporate transactions occur. Upon a conversion, we would paythe 2022 Notes will be settled in cash, for the principal amount and, if applicable, deliver shares of our common stock (subject to our right to deliver cash in lieu of all or a portion of such shares ofcombination thereof, at our common stock) based on a daily conversion value.election. If a fundamental change occurs prior to the maturity date, holders of the 2022 Notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their 2022 Notes for cash at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the


principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if specific corporate events occur prior to the maturity date, we would increase the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its 2022 Notes in connection with such an event in certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2017, none of the conditions permitting the holders of the 2022 Notes to early convert had been met. Therefore, the 2022 Notes are classified as long-term.

In accordance with GAAP relating to embedded conversion features, we initially valued and bifurcated the conversion feature associated with the 2022 Notes. We recorded to stockholders’ equity $145.6$146 million for the conversion feature. The resulting debt discount is being amortized to interest expense at an effective interest rate of 6.00%.


In connection with the offering of the 2022 Notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions whereby we havehad the option to purchase initially (subject to adjustment for certain specified events) 3.014.9 million shares of our common stock at a price of $327.50$65.50 per share.share as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. The cost of the convertible note hedge transactions was $204.1$204 million. In addition, we sold warrants whereby the holders of the warrants have the option to purchase initially (subject to adjustment for certain specified events) 3.014.9 million shares of our common stock at a price of $655.00$131.00 per share. We received $52.9$53 million in cash proceeds from the sale of these warrants. Taken together, the purchase of the convertible note hedges and the sale of the warrants are intended to reduce potential dilution from the conversion of the 2022 Notes and to effectively increase the overall conversion price from $327.50$65.50 to $655.00$131.00 per share, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. As these transactions meet certain accounting criteria, the convertible note hedges and warrants are recorded in stockholders’ equity and are not accounted for as derivatives. The net cost incurred in connection with the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

During each of the quarters of 2020, the closing price of our common stock exceeded 130% of the applicable conversion price of the 2022 Notes on at least 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days of the quarter, causing the 2022 Notes to be convertible by their holders during the second, third and fourth quarters of 2020 and the first quarter of 2021. As we now expect to settle a portion of the 2022 Notes in the first quarter of 2021, we reclassified $115 million of the carrying value of the 2022 Notes from debt and finance leases, net of current portion to current portion of debt and finance leases on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. Additionally, we reclassified $5 million, representing the difference between the current portion of aggregate principal of our 2022 Notes and the current portion of the carrying value as of December 31, 2020, as mezzanine equity from permanent equity on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. As the settlement of conversion of the remainder of the 2022 Notes would be in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof is at our election, the remaining liability is classified as non-current. The debt discounts recorded on the 2022 Notes are recognized as interest expense through March 2022 and early conversions have resulted in the acceleration of such recognition through December 31, 2020, including the losses on extinguishment of debt appearing in the Interest Expense table below.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, $474 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes were converted for $474 million in cash and 6.2 million shares of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. As a result, we recorded a decrease to additional paid-in capital of $5 million. The note hedges we entered into in connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes were automatically settled with the respective conversions of the 2022 Notes, resulting in the receipt of 6.2 million shares of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. The related warrants will settle under their terms after the maturity or settlement of the 2022 Notes. As of December 31, 2020, the if-converted value of the notes exceeds the outstanding principal amount by $4.92 billion.

2024 Notes, Bond Hedges and Warrant Transactions

In May 2019, we issued $1.84 billion in aggregate principal amount of our 2024 Notes in a public offering. The net proceeds from the issuance, after deducting transaction costs, were $1.82 billion.

As adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split, each $1,000 of principal of the 2024 Notes is convertible into 16.1380 shares of our common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $61.97 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events. Holders of the 2024 Notes may convert, at their option, on or after February 15, 2024. Further, holders of the 2024 Notes may convert, at their option, prior to February 15, 2024 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter commencing after September 30, 2019 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each trading day; (2) during the five-business day period after any 5-consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the 2024 Notes for each trading day of such period is less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our common stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day, or (3) if specified corporate events occur. Upon conversion, the 2024 Notes will be settled in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof, at our election. If a fundamental change occurs prior to the maturity date, holders of the 2024 Notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their 2024 Notes for cash at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if specific corporate events occur prior to the maturity date, we would increase the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its 2024 Notes in connection with such an event in certain circumstances.

In accordance with GAAP relating to embedded conversion features, we initially valued and bifurcated the conversion feature associated with the 2024 Notes. We recorded to stockholders’ equity $491 million for the conversion feature. The resulting debt discount is being amortized to interest expense at an effective interest rate of 8.68%.


In connection with the offering of the 2024 Notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions whereby we had the option to purchase 29.7 million shares of our common stock at a price of $61.97 per share as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. The cost of the convertible note hedge transactions was $476 million. In addition, we sold warrants whereby the holders of the warrants have the option to purchase 29.7 million shares of our common stock at a price of $121.50 per share, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. We received $174 million in cash proceeds from the sale of these warrants. Taken together, the purchase of the convertible note hedges and the sale of the warrants are intended to reduce potential dilution from the conversion of the 2024 Notes and to effectively increase the overall conversion price from $61.97 to $121.50 per share. As these transactions meet certain accounting criteria, the convertible note hedges and warrants are recorded in stockholders’ equity and are not accounted for as derivatives. The net cost incurred in connection with the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheet.

During each of the quarters of 2020, the closing price of our common stock exceeded 130% of the applicable conversion price of the 2024 Notes on at least 20 of the last 30 consecutive trading days of the quarter, causing the 2024 Notes to be convertible by their holders during the second, third and fourth quarters of 2020 and the first quarter of 2021. As we now expect to settle a portion of the 2024 Notes in the first quarter of 2021, we reclassified $171 million, of the carrying value of the 2024 Notes from debt and finance leases, net of current portion to current portion of debt and finance leases on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. Additionally, we reclassified $43 million, representing the difference between the current portion of aggregate principal of our 2024 Notes and the current portion of the carrying value as of December 31, 2020, as mezzanine equity from permanent equity on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020. As the settlement of conversion of the remainder of the 2024 Notes would be in cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof is at our election, the remaining liability is classified as non-current. The debt discounts recorded on the 2024 Notes are recognized as interest expense through May 2024 and early conversions have resulted in the acceleration of such recognition through December 31, 2020, including the losses on extinguishment of debt appearing in the Interest Expense table below.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, $558 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes were converted for $558 million in cash and 8.0 million shares of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. As a result, we recorded a decrease to additional paid-in capital of $31 million. The note hedges we entered into in connection with the issuance of the 2024 Notes were automatically settled with the respective conversions of the 2024 Notes, resulting in the receipt of 8.0 million shares of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. The related warrants will settle under their terms after the maturity or settlement of the 2024 Notes. As of December 31, 2020, the if-converted value of the notes exceeds the outstanding principal amount by $13.32 billion.

2025 Notes

In August 2017, we issued $1.80 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured 5.30% Seniorthe 2025 Notes due in August 2025 pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act. The net proceeds from the issuance, after deducting transaction costs, were $1.77 billion.

Credit Agreement

In June 2015, we entered into a senior asset-based revolving credit agreement (the(as amended from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks. Borrowed funds bear interest, at our option, at an annual rate of (a) 1% plus LIBOR or (b) the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) the lenders’ “prime rate” or (iii) 1% plus LIBOR. The fee for undrawn amounts is 0.25% per annum. The Credit Agreement is secured by certain of our accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Availability under the Credit Agreement is based on the value of such assets, as reduced by certain reserves. During 2017,

In March 2020, we upsized the committed amountCredit Agreement by $100 million, which matures July 2023, to $2.525 billion. In June 2020, $197 million of commitment under the Credit Agreement was upsized three times.

Secured Revolving Credit Facility

SolarCity entered into a revolving credit agreementexpired in accordance with a syndicate of banks (the “Secured Revolving Credit Facility”) to fund working capital, letters of credit and general corporate needs. Borrowed funds bore interest, at our option, at an annual rate of (a) 3.25% plus LIBOR or (b) 2.25% plus the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) Bank of America’s published “prime rate” or (iii) LIBOR plus 1.00%. The fee for undrawn commitments was 0.375% per annum. The Secured Revolving Credit Facility was secured by certain of SolarCity’s accounts receivable, inventory, machinery, equipment and other assets. In August 2017, the Secured Revolving Credit Facility was terminated,its terms and the aggregate outstanding principal amount of $324.0 million was fully repaid.total commitment decreased to $2.328 billion  .

Vehicle and Other Loans

We have entered into various vehicle and other loan agreements with various financial institutions. The vehicle loans are secured by the vehicles financed.

2.75%Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due in 20182020

In October 2013,December 2015, SolarCity Corporation (“SolarCity”) issued $230.0$113 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.75%NaN-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due on NovemberDecember 1, 20182020 in a public offering.

private placement. $13 million of these notes were issued to related parties.


EachAs adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split, each $1,000 of principal of the convertible seniorthese notes is nowwas convertible into 1.783816.6665 shares of our common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $560.64 per share (subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events related to dividends, tender offers or exchange offers). Holders of the convertible senior notes may convert, at their option, at any time up to and including the second trading day prior to the maturity date. If certain events that would constitute a make-whole fundamental change (such as significant changes in ownership, corporate structure or tradability of our common stock) occur prior to the maturity date, we would increase the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its convertible senior notes in connection with such an event in certain circumstances. The maximum conversion rate is capped at 2.3635 shares for each $1,000 of principal of the convertible senior notes, which is equivalent to a minimum conversion price of $423.10 per share. The convertible senior notes do not have a cash conversion option. The convertible senior note holders may require us to repurchase their convertible senior notes for cash only under certain defined fundamental changes.

1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2019

In September 2014, SolarCity issued $500.0 million and in October 2014, SolarCity issued an additional $66.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due on November 1, 2019 in a private placement.

Each $1,000 of principal of the convertible senior notes is now convertible into 1.3169 shares of our common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $759.36$60.00 per share (subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events related to dividends, tender offers or exchange offers). The maximum conversion rate is capped at 1.744921.1538 shares for each $1,000 of principal of the convertible seniorthese notes, which is equivalent to a minimum conversion price of $573.10$47.27 per share. The convertible senior notes do not have a cash conversion option. The convertible senior note holders mayof these notes were able to require us to repurchase their convertible senior notes for cash only under certain defined fundamental changes.

In connection with the issuance of the convertible senior notes in September and October 2014, SolarCity entered into capped call option agreements to reduce the potential dilution upon the conversion of the convertible senior notes. Specifically, upon the exercise of the capped call options, we would now receive shares of our common stock equal to 745,377 shares multiplied by (a) (i) the lower of $1,146.18 or the then market price of our common stock less (ii) $759.36 and divided by (b) the then market price of our common stock. The results of this formula are that we would receive more shares as the market price of our common stock exceeds $759.36 and approaches $1,146.18, but we would receive less shares as the market price of our common stock exceeds $1,146.18. Consequently, if the convertible senior notes are converted, then the number of shares to be issued by us would be effectively partially offset by the shares received by us under the capped call options. We can also elect to receive the equivalent value of cash in lieu of shares. The capped call options expire on various dates ranging from September 4, 2019 to October 29, 2019, and the formula above would be adjusted in the event of a merger; a tender offer; nationalization; insolvency; delisting of our common stock; changes in law; failure to deliver; insolvency filing; stock splits, combinations, dividends, repurchases or similar events or an announcement of certain of the preceding actions. Although intended to reduce the net number of shares issued after a conversion of the convertible senior notes, the capped call options were separately negotiated transactions, are not a part of the terms of the convertible senior notes, do not affect the rights of the convertible senior note holders and take effect regardless of whether the convertible senior notes are actually converted. The capped call options meet the criteria for equity classification because they are indexed to our common stock and we always control whether settlement will be in shares or cash.

Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due in 2020

In December 2015, SolarCity issued $113.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due on December 1, 2020 in a private placement. $13.0 million of the convertible senior notes were issued to related parties and are separately presented on the consolidated balance sheets (see Note 21, Related Party Transactions).

Each $1,000 of principal of the convertible senior notes is now convertible into 3.3333 shares of our common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $300.00 per share (subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events related to dividends, tender offers or exchange offers). The maximum conversion rate is capped at 4.2308 shares for each $1,000 of principal of the convertible senior notes, which is equivalent to a minimum


conversion price of $236.36 per share. The convertible senior notes do not have a cash conversion option. The convertible senior note holders may require us to repurchase their convertible senior notes for cash only under certain defined fundamental changes. On or after June 30, 2017, the convertible seniorthese notes are redeemable by us in the event that the closing price of our common stock exceeds 200% of the conversion price for 45 consecutive trading days ending within three trading days of such redemption notice at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest.

On April 26, 2017, our CEO converted all of his Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due inDuring the year ended December 31, 2020, which had an aggregate principal amount of $10.0$103 million (see Note 14, Common Stock). As a result, we recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $2.2 million.

Related Party Promissory Notes due in February 2018

On April 11, 2017, our CEO, SolarCity’s former CEO and SolarCity’s former Chief Technology Officer exchanged their $100.0 million (collectively) in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% Solar Bonds due in February 2018these notes were converted for promissory notes in1.7  million shares of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to the same amounts and with substantially the same terms.Stock Split. As a result, we recorded an increase to additional paid-in capital of $101 million. 

Solar Bonds and other Loans

Solar Bonds are senior unsecured obligations that are structurally subordinate to the indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries. Solar Bonds were issued under multiple series with various terms and interest rates. Additionally, we have assumed the 5.50% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2022 issued by Maxwell (the “Maxwell Notes”), which are convertible into shares of our common stock as a result of our acquisition of Maxwell. As of December 31, 2020, the if-converted value of the Maxwell Notes exceeds the outstanding principal amount by $447 million.

Automotive Asset-backed Notes

From time to time, we transfer receivables or beneficial interests related to certain leased vehicles into special purpose entities (“SPEs”) and issue Automotive Asset-backed Notes, backed by these automotive assets to investors. The SPEs are consolidated in the financial statements. The cash flows generated by these automotive assets are used to service the principal and interest payments on the Automotive Asset-backed Notes and satisfy the SPEs’ expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to the owners of the SPEs. We recognize revenue earned from the associated customer lease contracts in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. The SPEs’ assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPEs, including the Automotive Asset-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets. A third party contracted with us to provide administrative and collection services for these automotive assets.

In AprilAugust 2020, we transferred beneficial interests related to certain leased vehicles into an SPE and issued $709 million in aggregate principal amount of Automotive Asset-backed Notes, with terms similar to our other Automotive Asset-backed Notes. The proceeds from the issuance, net of discounts and fees, were $706 million.

Solar Asset-backed Notes

From time to time, our subsidiaries pool and transfer either qualifying solar energy systems and the associated customer contracts or our interests in certain financing funds into SPEs and issue Solar Asset-backed Notes backed by these solar assets or interests to investors. The SPEs are wholly owned by us and are consolidated in the financial statements. The cash flows generated by these solar assets or distributed by the underlying financing funds to certain SPEs are used to service the principal and interest payments on the Solar Asset-backed Notes and satisfy the SPEs’ expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to us. We recognize revenue earned from the associated customer contracts in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. The SPEs’ assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPEs, including the Solar Asset-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets. We contracted with the SPEs to provide operations & maintenance and administrative services for the solar energy systems. As of December 31, 2020, solar assets pledged as collateral for Solar Asset-backed Notes had a carrying value of $660 million and are included within solar energy systems, net, on the consolidated balance sheet.

China Loan Agreements

In September 2019, one of our subsidiaries entered into a loan agreement with a lender in China for an unsecured 12-month revolving facility of up to RMB 5.0 billion (or the equivalent drawn in U.S. dollars), to finance vehicles in-transit to China (the “In-transit Finance Facility”). Borrowed funds incurred interest at an annual rate no greater than 90% of the one-year rate published by the People’s Bank of China. The loan facility is non-recourse to our assets. In September 2020, the In-transit Finance Facility matured.


In December 2019, one of our subsidiaries entered into loan agreements with a syndicate of lenders in China for: (i) a secured term loan facility of up to RMB 9.0 billion or the equivalent amount drawn in U.S. dollars (the “Fixed Asset Facility”) and (ii) an unsecured revolving loan facility of up to RMB 2.25 billion or the equivalent amount drawn in U.S. dollars (the “Working Capital Facility”), in each case to be used in connection with our construction of and production at our Gigafactory Shanghai. Outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Fixed Asset Facility accrue interest at a rate equal to: (i) for RMB-denominated loans, the market quoted interest rate published by the People’s Bank of China minus 0.7625%, and (ii) for U.S. dollar-denominated loans, the sum of one-year LIBOR plus 1.3%. Outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Working Capital Facility incurred interest at a rate equal to the market quoted interest rate published by the People’s Bank of China minus 0.4525%. The Fixed Asset Facility is secured by certain real property relating to Gigafactory Shanghai and both facilities are non-recourse to our other assets. In December 2020, the Working Capital Facility matured.

In May 2020, one of our subsidiaries entered into an additional Working Capital Loan Contract (the “2020 China Working Capital Facility”) with a lender in China for an unsecured revolving facility of up to RMB 4.00 billion (or the equivalent amount drawn in U.S. dollars), to be used for expenditures related to production at our Gigafactory Shanghai. Borrowed funds bear interest at an annual rate of: (i) for RMB-denominated loans, the market quoted interest rate published by an authority designated by the People’s Bank of China minus 0.35%, (ii) for U.S. dollar-denominated loans, the sum of one-year LIBOR plus 0.8%. The 2020 China Working Capital Facility is non-recourse to our assets and is scheduled to mature in June 2021, the first anniversary of the first borrowing under the loan.

Cash Equity Debt

In connection with the cash equity financing deals closed in 2016, our subsidiaries issued $502 million in aggregate principal amount of debt that bears interest at fixed rates. This debt is secured by, among other things, our interests in certain financing funds and is non-recourse to our other assets.

Solar Loan-backed Notes

In January 2016 and January 2017, we extinguishedour subsidiaries pooled and transferred certain seriesMyPower customer notes receivable into two SPEs and issued $330 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar BondsLoan-backed Notes, backed by prepaying $20.9 millionthese notes receivable to investors. Accordingly, we did not recognize a gain or loss on the transfer of these notes receivable. The SPEs are wholly owned by us and are consolidated in the financial statements. The payments received by the SPEs from these notes receivable are used to service the semi-annual principal and interest. Seeinterest payments on the Solar Loan-backed Notes and satisfy the SPEs’ expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to us. The SPEs’ assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPEs, including the Solar Loan-backed Note 21, Related Party Transactions, for Solar Bonds issuedholders, have no recourse to related parties.our other assets.

Warehouse Agreements

OnIn August 31, 2016, our subsidiaries entered into the a loan and security agreement (the(as amended from time to time, the “2016 Warehouse Agreement”) for borrowings secured by the future cash flows arising from certain leases and the associated leased vehicles. On August 17, 2017, the 2016 Warehouse Agreement was amended to modify the interest rates and extend the availability period and the maturity date, and our subsidiaries entered into another loan and security agreement (the “2017 Warehouse Agreement”) with substantially the same terms as and that sharesshared the same committed amount with the 2016 Warehouse Agreement. On August 16, 2018, the 2016 Warehouse Agreement and 2017 Warehouse Agreement were amended to extend the availability periods thereunder from August 17, 2018 to August 16, 2019 and extend the maturity dates from September 2019 to September 2020. On December 28, 2018, our subsidiaries terminated the 2017 Warehouse Agreement after having fully repaid all obligations thereunder, and entered into a third loan and security agreement with substantially the same terms as and that shared the same committed amount with the 2016 Warehouse Agreement (the “2018 Warehouse Agreement”). We refer to these agreements together as the “Warehouse Agreements.”Agreements”. Amounts drawn under the Warehouse Agreements generally bear or bore interest at (i) LIBOR plus a fixed margin above (i) LIBOR or (ii) the commercial paper rate. The Warehouse Agreements are or were non-recourse to our other assets.

In August 2020, one of our subsidiaries terminated the 2018 Warehouse Agreement after having fully repaid all obligations thereunder, leaving the 2016 Warehouse Agreement as the only remaining Warehouse Agreement. In August 2020, we further amended and restated the 2016 Warehouse Agreement to extend the maturity date to September 2022. The 2016 Warehouse Agreement currently has an aggregate lender commitment of $1.10 billion, the same amount as the aggregate lender commitment previously shared with the 2018 Warehouse Agreement prior to the termination of the latter.

Pursuant to the Warehouse Agreements, an undivided beneficial interest in the future cash flows arising from certain leases and the related leased vehicles has been sold for legal purposes but continues to be reported in the consolidated financial statements. The interest in the future cash flows arising from these leases and the related vehicles is not available to pay the claims of our creditors other than pursuant to obligations to the lenders under the Warehouse Agreements. We retain the right to receive theAny excess cash flows not neededrequired to pay obligations under the Warehouse Agreements.Agreements are or were available for distributions.


Solar Term Loans

CanadaOur subsidiaries have entered into agreements for term loans with various financial institutions. The term loans are secured by substantially all of the assets of the subsidiaries, including its interests in certain financing funds, and are non-recourse to our other assets

Automotive Lease-backed Credit FacilityFacilities

In December 2016, one of our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the “Canada Credit Facility”) with a bank for borrowings secured by our interests in certain vehicle leases,leases. In December 2017 and in December 2017,2018, the Canada Credit Facility was amended to add our interests in additional vehicle leases as collateral, allowing us to draw additional funds. Amounts drawn under the Canada Credit Facility bear interest at fixed rates. The Canada Credit Facility is non-recourse to our other assets.

Term Loan due in December 2018

On March 31, 2016, a subsidiary of SolarCityIn September 2020, an SPE entered into an agreementa revolving credit facility with a bank for a term loan. The term loan bearsborrowings secured by the beneficial interests related to certain leased vehicles that we transferred to the SPE. Amounts drawn under this facility bear interest at an annual rate of the lender’s cost of funds1.85% plus 3.25%. The fee for undrawn commitments is 0.85% per annum. On March 31, 2017, the agreement was amended to upsize the committed amount, extend the availability periodLIBOR and extend the maturity date. The term loan is secured by substantially all of the assets of the subsidiary and isare non-recourse to our other assets.


Term Loan due in January 2021Solar Revolving Credit Facility and other Loans

In January 2016, a subsidiary of SolarCityWe have entered into an agreement with a syndicate of banks for a term loan. The term loan bears interest at an annual rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. The term loan is secured by substantially all of the assets of the subsidiary, including its interests in certain financing funds, and is non-recourse to our other assets.

MyPower Revolving Credit Facility

On January 9, 2015, a subsidiary of SolarCity entered into a revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks to obtain funding for the MyPower customer loan program. The Class A notes bore interest at an annual rate of 2.50% plus (a) the commercial paper rate or (b) 1.50% plus adjusted LIBOR. The Class B notes bore interest at an annual rate of 5.00% plus LIBOR. The fee for undrawn commitments under the Class A notes was 0.50% per annum. The fee for undrawn commitments under the Class B notes was 0.50% per annum. The MyPowervarious solar revolving credit facility was secured by the payments owed to us under MyPower customer loans and was non-recourse to our other assets. On January 27, 2017, the MyPowerloan agreements with various financial institutions. The solar revolving credit facility matured, and the aggregate outstanding principal amount of $133.8 million was fully repaid.

Revolving Aggregation Credit Facility

On May 4, 2015, a subsidiary of SolarCity entered into an agreement with a syndicate of banks for a revolving aggregation credit facility. On March 23, 2016 and June 23, 2017, the agreement was amended to modify the interest rates and extend the availability period and the maturity date. The revolving aggregation credit facility bears interest at an annual rate of 2.75% plus (i) for commercial paper loans, the commercial paper rate and (ii) for LIBOR loans, at our option, three-month LIBOR or daily LIBOR. The revolving aggregation credit facility is secured by certain assets of certain of our subsidiariesthe subsidiary and is non-recourse to our other assets.

Solar Renewable Energy Credit Loan Facilities

On March 31, 2016, a subsidiary of SolarCity entered into an agreement for a term loan. The term loan bore interest at an annual rate of one-month LIBOR plus 9.00% or, at our option, 8.00% plus the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) the prime rate or (iii) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%. The term loan was secured by substantially all of the assets of the subsidiary, including its rights under forward contracts to sell solar renewable energy credits, and was non-recourse to our other assets. On March 1, 2017, we fully repaid the principal outstanding under the term loan.

On July 14, 2016, the same subsidiary entered into an agreement for another loan facility. The loan facility bears interest at an annual rate of one-month LIBOR plus 5.75% or, at our option, 4.75% plus the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) the prime rate or (iii) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%. The loan facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the subsidiary, including its rights under forward contracts to sell solar renewable energy credits, and is non-recourse to our other assets.

Cash Equity Debt I

In connection with the cash equity financing on May 2, 2016, SolarCity issued $121.7 million in aggregate principal amount of debt that bears interest at a fixed rate. This debt is secured by, among other things, our interests in certain financing funds and is non-recourse to our other assets.

Cash Equity Debt II

In connection with the cash equity financing on September 8, 2016, SolarCity issued $210.0 million in aggregate principal amount of debt that bears interest at a fixed rate. This debt is secured by, among other things, our interests in certain financing funds and is non-recourse to our other assets.

Cash Equity Debt III

In connection with the cash equity financing on December 16, 2016, we issued $170.0 million in aggregate principal amount of debt that bears interest at a fixed rate. This debt is secured by, among other things, our interests in certain financing funds and is non-recourse to our other assets.


Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2013-1

In November 2013, SolarCity pooled and transferred qualifying solar energy systems and the associated customer contracts into a Special Purpose Entity (“SPE”) and issued $54.4 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2013-1, backed by these solar assets to investors. The SPE is wholly owned by us and is consolidated in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2017, these solar assets had a carrying value of $89.0 million and are included within solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. The Solar Asset-backed Notes were issued at a discount of 0.05%. The cash flows generated by these solar assets are used to service the monthly principal and interest payments on the Solar Asset-backed Notes and satisfy the SPE’s expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. We recognize revenue earned from the associated customer contracts in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. The SPE’s assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPE, including the Solar Asset-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets. SolarCity contracted with the SPE to provide operations & maintenance and administrative services for the solar energy systems.

In connection with the pooling of the solar assets that were transferred to the SPE in November 2013, SolarCity terminated a lease pass-through arrangement with an investor. The lease pass-through arrangement had been accounted for as a borrowing, and the amount outstanding under the lease pass-through arrangement was recorded as a lease pass-through financing obligation. The balance that was then outstanding under the lease pass-through arrangement was $56.4 million. SolarCity paid the investor an aggregate of $40.2 million, and the remaining balance is paid over time using the net cash flows generated by the assets previously leased under the lease pass-through arrangement, after payment of the principal and interest on the Solar Asset-backed Notes and expenses related to the assets and the Solar Asset-backed Notes; this was contractually documented as a right to participate in the future cash flows of the SPE (“participation interest”). The participation interest was recorded as a component of other long-term liabilities for the non-current portion and accrued liabilities for the current portion. We account for the participation interest as a liability because the investor has no voting or management rights in the SPE, the participation interest would terminate upon the investor achieving a specified return and the investor has the option to put the participation interest to us on August 3, 2021 for the amount necessary for the investor to achieve the specified return, which would require us to settle the participation interest in cash. In addition, under the terms of the participation interest, we have the option to purchase the participation interest from the investor for the amount necessary for the investor to achieve the specified return.

Solar Asset-backed Notes, 2014-1

In April 2014, SolarCity pooled and transferred qualifying solar energy systems and the associated customer contracts into a SPE and issued $70.2 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2014-1, backed by these solar assets to investors. The SPE is wholly owned by us and is consolidated in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2017, these solar assets had a carrying value of $109.3 million and are included within solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net, in the consolidated balance sheets. The Solar Asset-backed Notes were issued at a discount of 0.01%. The cash flows generated by these solar assets are used to service the monthly principal and interest payments on the Solar Asset-backed Notes and satisfy the SPE’s expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. We recognize revenue earned from the associated customer contracts in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. The SPE’s assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPE, including the Solar Asset-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets. SolarCity contracted with the SPE to provide operations & maintenance and administrative services for the solar energy systems.

Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2014-2

In July 2014, SolarCity pooled and transferred qualifying solar energy systems and the associated customer contracts into a SPE and issued $160.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2014-2, Class A, and $41.5 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2014-2, Class B, backed by these solar assets to investors. The SPE is wholly owned by us and is consolidated in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2017, these solar assets had a carrying value of $255.7 million and are included within solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net, in the consolidated balance sheets. The Solar Asset-backed Notes were issued at a discount of 0.01%. These solar assets and the associated customer contracts are leased to an investor under a lease pass-through arrangement that we have accounted for as a borrowing. The rent paid by the investor under the lease pass-through arrangement is used (and following the expiration of the lease


pass-through arrangement, the cash generated by these solar assets will be used) to service the semi-annual principal and interest payments on the Solar Asset-backed Notes and satisfy the SPE’s expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. We recognize revenue earned from the associated customer contracts in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. The SPE’s assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPE, including the Solar Asset-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets. SolarCity contracted with the SPE to provide operations & maintenance and administrative services for certain of the solar energy systems.

Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2015-1

In August 2015, SolarCity pooled and transferred its interests in certain financing funds into a SPE and issued $103.5 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2015-1, Class A, and $20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2015-1, Class B, backed by these solar assets to investors. The SPE is wholly owned by us and is consolidated in the financial statements. The Solar Asset-backed Notes were issued at a discount of 0.05% for Class A and 1.46% for Class B. The cash distributed by the underlying financing funds to the SPE are used to service the semi-annual principal and interest payments on the Solar Asset-backed Notes and satisfy the SPE’s expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The SPE’s assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPE, including the Solar Asset-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets.

Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2016-1

In February 2016, SolarCity transferred qualifying solar energy systems and the associated customer contracts into a SPE and issued $52.2 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2016-1, backed by these solar assets to investors. The SPE is wholly owned by us and is consolidated in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2017, these solar assets had a carrying value of $84.3 million and are included within solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. The Solar Asset-backed Notes were issued at a discount of 6.71%. These solar assets and the associated customer contracts are leased to an investor under a lease pass-through arrangement that we have accounted for as a borrowing. The rent paid by the investor under the lease pass-through arrangement is used (and following the expiration of the lease pass-through arrangement, the cash generated by these solar assets will be used) to service the semi-annual principal and interest payments on the Solar Asset-backed Notes and satisfy the SPE’s expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. We recognize revenue earned from the associated customer contracts in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. The SPE’s assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPE, including the Solar Asset-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets. SolarCity contracted with the SPE to provide operations & maintenance and administrative services for certain of the solar energy systems.

Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2017-1

In November 2017, we pooled and transferred our interests in certain financing funds into a SPE and issued $265.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2017-1, Class A, and $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2017-1, Class B, backed by these solar assets to investors. The SPE is wholly owned by us and is consolidated in the financial statements. The Solar Asset-backed Notes were issued at a discount of 0.01% for Class A and 0.04% for Class B. The cash distributed by the underlying financing funds to the SPE are used to service the semi-annual principal and interest payments on the Solar Asset-backed Notes and satisfy the SPE’s expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The SPE’s assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPE, including the Solar Asset-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets.

Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2017-2

In December 2017, we transferred qualifying solar energy systems and the associated customer contracts into a SPE and issued $99.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2017-2, Class A, and $31.9 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Asset-backed Notes, Series 2017-2, Class B, backed by these solar assets to investors. The SPE is wholly owned by us and is consolidated in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2017, these solar assets had a carrying value of $217.2 million and are included within solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net, on the consolidated balance sheets. The Solar Asset-backed Notes were issued


at a discount of 0.01% for Class A and 0.04% for Class B. Most of these solar assets and the associated customer contracts are leased to investors under lease pass-through arrangements that we have accounted for as borrowings. The rent paid by the investors under the lease pass-through arrangements is used (and following the expiration of the lease pass-through arrangements, the cash generated by these solar assets will be used) to service the semi-annual principal and interest payments on the Solar Asset-backed Notes and satisfy the SPE’s expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. We recognize revenue earned from the associated customer contracts in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. The SPE’s assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPE, including the Solar Asset-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets. We contracted with the SPE to provide operations & maintenance and administrative services for certain of the solar energy systems.

Solar Loan-backed Notes, Series 2016-A

On January 21, 2016, SolarCity pooled and transferred certain MyPower customer notes receivable into a SPE and issued $151.6 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Loan-backed Notes, Series 2016-A, Class A, and $33.4 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Loan-backed Notes, Series 2016-A, Class B, backed by these notes receivable to investors. The SPE is wholly owned by us and is consolidated in the financial statements. The Solar Loan-backed Notes were issued at a discount of 3.22% for Class A and 15.90% for Class B. The payments received by the SPE from these notes receivable are used to service the semi-annual principal and interest payments on the Solar Loan-backed Notes and satisfy the SPE’s expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The SPE’s assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPE, including the Solar Loan-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets.

Solar Loan-backed Notes, Series 2017-A

On January 27, 2017, we pooled and transferred certain MyPower customer notes receivable into a SPE and issued $123.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Loan-backed Notes, Series 2017-A, Class A; $8.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Loan-backed Notes, Series 2017-A, Class B, and $13.2 million in aggregate principal amount of Solar Loan-backed Notes, Series 2017-A, Class C, backed by these notes receivable to investors. The SPE is wholly owned by us and is consolidated in the financial statements. Accordingly, we did not recognize a gain or loss on the transfer of these notes receivable. The Solar Loan-backed Notes were issued at a discount of 1.87% for Class A, 1.86% for Class B and 8.13% for Class C. The payments received by the SPE from these notes receivable are used to service the semi-annual principal and interest payments on the Solar Loan-backed Notes and satisfy the SPE’s expenses, and any remaining cash is distributed to one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The SPE’s assets and cash flows are not available to our other creditors, and the creditors of the SPE, including the Solar Loan-backed Note holders, have no recourse to our other assets.

Interest Expense

The following table presents the interest expense related to the contractual interest coupon, the amortization of debt issuance costs, and the amortization of debt discounts and losses on extinguishment of debt on our convertible senior notes with cash conversion features, which include the 1.50% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2018 Notes,(matured in June 2018), the 2019 Notes (matured in March 2019), the 2021 Notes, and the 2022 Notes and the 2024 Notes (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Contractual interest coupon

 

$

39,129

 

 

$

27,060

 

 

$

32,061

 

 

$

73

 

 

$

65

 

 

$

43

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

 

6,932

 

 

 

8,567

 

 

 

8,102

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

7

 

Amortization of debt discounts

 

 

114,023

 

 

 

99,811

 

 

 

97,786

 

 

 

173

 

 

 

148

 

 

 

123

 

Losses on extinguishment of debt

 

 

105

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

160,084

 

 

$

135,438

 

 

$

137,949

 

 

$

358

 

 

$

220

 

 

$

173

 

Pledged Assets

As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we had pledged or restricted $4.056.04 billion and $2.30$5.72 billion of our assets (consisted(consisting principally of restricted cash, receivables, inventory, SRECs, solar energy systems, operating lease vehicles, land use rights, property and equipment)equipment, and equity interests in certain SPEs) as collateral for our outstanding debt.

Schedule of Principal Maturities of Debt

The future scheduled principal maturities of debt as of December 31, 2020 were as follows (in millions):

 

 

Recourse debt

 

 

Non-recourse debt

 

 

Total

 

2021

 

$

760

 

 

$

1,058

 

 

$

1,818

 

2022

 

 

427

 

 

 

1,508

 

 

 

1,935

 

2023

 

 

1,895

 

 

 

511

 

 

 

2,406

 

2024

 

 

1,068

 

 

 

783

 

 

 

1,851

 

2025

 

 

1,804

 

 

 

175

 

 

 

1,979

 

Thereafter

 

 

3

 

 

 

577

 

 

 

580

 

Total

 

$

5,957

 

 

$

4,612

 

 

$

10,569

 

 

 


Note 1413Common StockLeases

In August 2015, we completed a public offering of common stockWe have entered into various operating and sold a total of 3,099,173 sharesfinance lease agreements for certain of our common stockoffices, manufacturing and warehouse facilities, retail and service locations, equipment, vehicles, and solar energy systems, worldwide. We determine if an arrangement is a lease, or contains a lease, at inception and record the leases in our financial statements upon lease commencement, which is the date when the underlying asset is made available for total cash proceedsuse by the lessor.

We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, and have elected to utilize the practical expedient to account for lease and non-lease components together as a single combined lease component, from both a lessee and lessor perspective with the exception of $738.3 million (which includes 82,645 sharesdirect sales-type leases and production equipment classes embedded in supply agreements. From a lessor perspective, the timing and pattern of transfer are the same for the non-lease components and associated lease component and, the lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease.

We have elected not to present short-term leases on the consolidated balance sheet as these leases have a lease term of 12 months or $20.0 million soldless at lease inception and do not contain purchase options or renewal terms that we are reasonably certain to our CEO, netexercise. All other lease assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of underwriting discounts and offering costs).

In May 2016, we completed a public offering of common stock and sold a total of 7,915,004 shareslease payments over the lease term at commencement date. Because most of our common stockleases do not provide an implicit rate of return, we used our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments.

Our leases, where we are the lessee, often include options to extend the lease term for total cash proceeds of approximately $1.7 billion, net of underwriting discounts and offering costs.

On November 21, 2016, we completed the acquisition of SolarCity (see Note 3, Business Combinations) and exchanged 11,124,497 sharesup to 10 years. Some of our common stock for 101,131,791 shares of SolarCity common stock in accordance withleases also include options to terminate the termslease prior to the end of the Merger Agreement.agreed upon lease term. For purposes of calculating lease liabilities, lease terms include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise such options.

In March 2017,Lease expense for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term as cost of revenues or operating expenses depending on the nature of the leased asset. Certain operating leases provide for annual increases to lease payments based on an index or rate. We calculate the present value of future lease payments based on the index or rate at the lease commencement date for new leases commencing after January 1, 2019. For historical leases, we completed a public offeringused the index or rate as of January 1, 2019. Differences between the calculated lease payment and actual payment are expensed as incurred. Amortization of finance lease assets is recognized over the lease term as cost of revenues or operating expenses depending on the nature of the leased asset. Interest expense on finance lease liabilities is recognized over the lease term in interest expense.

The balances for the operating and finance leases where we are the lessee are presented as follows (in millions) within our consolidated balance sheet:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Operating leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

$

1,558

 

 

$

1,218

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued liabilities and other

 

$

286

 

 

$

228

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

1,254

 

 

 

956

 

Total operating lease liabilities

 

$

1,540

 

 

$

1,184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Solar energy systems, net

 

$

29

 

 

$

30

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

1,465

 

 

 

1,600

 

Total finance lease assets

 

$

1,494

 

 

$

1,630

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt and finance leases

 

$

374

 

 

$

386

 

Long-term debt and finance leases, net of current portion

 

 

1,094

 

 

 

1,232

 

Total finance lease liabilities

 

$

1,468

 

 

$

1,618

 


The components of lease expense are as follows (in millions) within our consolidated statements of operations:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Operating lease expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease expense (1)

 

$

451

 

 

$

426

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance lease expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of leased assets

 

$

348

 

 

$

299

 

Interest on lease liabilities

 

 

100

 

 

 

104

 

Total finance lease expense

 

$

448

 

 

$

403

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total lease expense

 

$

899

 

 

$

829

 

(1)

Includes short-term leases and variable lease costs, which are immaterial.

Other information related to leases where we are the lessee is as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

6.2 years

 

 

6.2 years

 

Finance leases

 

4.9 years

 

 

3.9 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average discount rate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

5.8

%

 

 

6.5

%

Finance leases

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

6.5

%

Supplemental cash flow information related to leases where we are the lessee is as follows (in millions):

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating cash outflows from operating leases

 

$

456

 

 

$

396

 

Operating cash outflows from finance leases (interest payments)

 

$

100

 

 

$

104

 

Financing cash outflows from finance leases

 

$

338

 

 

$

321

 

Leased assets obtained in exchange for finance lease liabilities

 

$

188

 

 

$

616

 

Leased assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities

 

$

553

 

 

$

202

 

As of December 31, 2020, the maturities of our common stockoperating and issued a totalfinance lease liabilities (excluding short-term leases) are as follows (in millions):

 

 

Operating

 

 

Finance

 

 

 

Leases

 

 

Leases

 

2021

 

$

366

 

 

$

462

 

2022

 

 

327

 

 

 

446

 

2023

 

 

279

 

 

 

412

 

2024

 

 

245

 

 

 

299

 

2025

 

 

204

 

 

 

9

 

Thereafter

 

 

425

 

 

 

7

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

 

1,846

 

 

 

1,635

 

Less: Interest

 

 

306

 

 

 

167

 

Present value of lease obligations

 

 

1,540

 

 

 

1,468

 

Less: Current portion

 

 

286

 

 

 

374

 

Long-term portion of lease obligations

 

$

1,254

 

 

$

1,094

 


Operating Lease and Sales-type Lease Receivables

We are the lessor of 1,536,259 shares for total cash proceedscertain vehicle and solar energy system arrangements as described in Note 2, Summary of $399.6 million (including 95,420 shares purchased by our CEO for $25.0 million), netSignificant Accounting Policies. As of underwriting discounts and offering costs.

In April 2017, our CEO exercised his right under the indenture to convert all of his Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due inDecember 31, 2020, which had an aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million. As a result, on April 26, 2017, we issued 33,333 shares maturities of our common stock to our CEO in accordance with the specified conversion rate,operating lease and we recorded an increase to additional paid-in capital of $10.3 million (see Note 13, Convertible and Long-Term Debt Obligations).

During 2017, we issued 1,510,274 shares of our common stock and paid $32.7 million in cash pursuant to conversions by or exchange agreements entered into with holders of $199.5 million in aggregate principal amount sales-type lease receivables from customers for each of the 2018 Notes (see Note 13, Convertiblenext five years and Long-Term Debt Obligations). Asthereafter were as follows (in millions):

 

 

Operating

 

 

Sales-type

 

 

 

Leases

 

 

Leases

 

2021

 

$

774

 

 

$

21

 

2022

 

 

594

 

 

 

21

 

2023

 

 

351

 

 

 

21

 

2024

 

 

206

 

 

 

30

 

2025

 

 

191

 

 

 

5

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,102

 

 

 

4

 

Gross lease receivables

 

$

4,218

 

 

$

102

 

The above table does not include vehicle sales to customers or leasing partners with a result, we recorded an increase to additional paid-in capitalresale value guarantee as the cash payments were received upfront. For our solar PPA arrangements, customers are charged solely based on actual power produced by the installed solar energy system at a predefined rate per kilowatt-hour of $163.0 million. In addition, we settled portionspower produced. The future payments from such arrangements are not included in the above table as they are a function of the bond hedgespower generated by the related solar energy systems in the future.

Net Investment in Sales-type Leases

Net investment in sales-type leases, which is the sum of the present value of the future contractual lease payments, is presented on the consolidated balance sheet as a component of prepaid expenses and warrants entered intoother current assets for the current portion and as other assets for the long-term portion. We introduced sales-type leasing programs in connection withvolume during the 2018 Notes, resulting in a net cash inflow of $56.8 million (which was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital), the issuance of 34,393 shares of our common stock and the receipt of 169,890 shares of our common stock.

During the fourththird quarter of 2017, we issued 34,772 shares2020 and therefore have 0 associated balances as of our common stockDecember 31, 2019. Lease receivables relating to sales-type leases are presented on the consolidated balance sheet as part of the purchase consideration for an acquisition.follows (in millions):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

Gross lease receivables

 

$

102

 

Unearned interest income

 

 

(11

)

Net investment in sales-type leases

 

$

91

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported as:

 

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

$

17

 

Other assets

 

 

74

 

Net investment in sales-type leases

 

$

91

 

 

Note 1514 – Equity Incentive Plans

In 2010,June 2019, we adopted the 20102019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010“2019 Plan”). The 20102019 Plan provides for the grantinggrant of stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, stock appreciation rights, performance units and stock purchase rightsperformance shares to our employees, directors and consultants. Stock options granted under the 20102019 Plan may be either incentive stock options or nonqualifiednonstatutory stock options. Incentive stock options may only be granted to our employees. NonqualifiedNonstatutory stock options may be granted to our employees, directors and consultants. Generally, our stock options and RSUs vest over up to four years and our stock options are exercisable over a maximum period of 10 years from their grant dates. Vesting typically terminates when the employment or consulting relationship ends. In addition, as a result of our acquisition of SolarCity, we assumed its equity award plans and its outstanding equity awards as of the Acquisition Date. SolarCity’s outstanding equity awards were converted into equity awards to acquire our common stock in share amounts and prices based on the Exchange Ratio, with the equity awards retaining the same vesting and other terms and conditions as in effect immediately prior to the acquisition. The vesting and other terms and conditions of the assumed equity awards are substantially the same as those of the 2010 Plan.

As of December 31, 2017, 7,045,6372020, 49.0 million shares were reserved and available for issuance under the 2010 Plan.

2019 Plan, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split.


The following table summarizes our stock option and RSU activity:

 

 

 

Stock Options

 

 

RSUs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

Average

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Remaining

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grant

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Exercise

 

 

Contractual

 

Value

 

 

Number

 

 

Date Fair

 

 

 

Options

 

 

Price

 

 

Life (Years)

 

(Billions)

 

 

of RSUs

 

 

Value

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

 

12,875,422

 

 

$

96.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,082,089

 

 

$

207.11

 

Granted

 

 

1,163,678

 

 

$

310.13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,073,404

 

 

$

308.71

 

Exercised or released

 

 

(2,324,871

)

 

$

81.04

 

 

 

 

$

0.54

 

 

 

(1,561,889

)

 

$

216.46

 

Cancelled

 

 

(833,204

)

 

$

327.33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(904,294

)

 

$

233.59

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

 

10,881,025

 

 

$

105.56

 

 

5.3

 

$

2.30

 

 

 

4,689,310

 

 

$

265.43

 

Vested and expected to vest,

   December 31, 2017

 

 

10,881,025

 

 

$

105.56

 

 

5.3

 

$

2.30

 

 

 

4,689,310

 

 

$

265.43

 

Exercisable and vested, December 31, 2017

 

 

8,029,228

 

 

$

77.56

 

 

4.7

 

$

1.91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Options

 

 

RSUs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

Average

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Average

 

 

Remaining

 

 

Intrinsic

 

 

Number

 

 

Grant

 

 

 

Options

 

 

Exercise

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Value

 

 

of RSUs

 

 

Date Fair

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

Price

 

 

Life (years)

 

 

(in billions)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

Value

 

Balance,

   December 31, 2019 (1)

 

 

149,974

 

 

$

55.90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,031

 

 

$

58.21

 

Granted

 

 

4,780

 

 

$

421.73

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,876

 

 

$

300.51

 

Exercised or released

 

 

(6,815

)

 

$

44.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,620

)

 

$

72.26

 

Cancelled

 

 

(1,006

)

 

$

68.67

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,498

)

 

$

82.31

 

Balance,

   December 31, 2020

 

 

146,933

 

 

$

68.26

 

 

6.08

 

 

$

93.66

 

 

 

18,789

 

 

$

136.49

 

Vested and

   expected to vest,

   December 31, 2020

 

 

101,617

 

 

$

69.04

 

 

 

5.80

 

 

$

64.69

 

 

 

18,778

 

 

$

136.53

 

Exercisable and vested,

   December 31, 2020

 

 

66,205

 

 

$

46.88

 

 

 

4.89

 

 

$

43.61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Prior period results have been adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. See Note 1, Overview, for details.

The weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs in the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $300.51, $56.55 and $63.29, respectively, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. The aggregate release date fair value of RSUs in the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was $491.0 million, $203.9$3.25 billion, $502 million and $94.5$546 million, respectively.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised in the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was $1.55 billion, $237 million and $293 million, respectively.

ESPP

Our employees are eligible to purchase our common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15% of their eligible compensation, subject to any plan limitations. The purchase price would be 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first and last trading days of each six-month offering period. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we issued 1.8 million, 2.5 million and 2.0 million shares under the ESPP, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. There were 34.3 million shares available for issuance under the ESPP as of December 31, 2020.

Fair Value Assumptions

We use the fair value method in recognizing stock-based compensation expense. Under the fair value method, we estimate the fair value of each stock option award with service or service and performance conditions and the ESPP on the grant date generally using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and themodel. The weighted-average assumptions used in the following table:Black-Scholes model for stock options are as follows:

 

  

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Risk-free interest rate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

1.5

%

 

 

1.6

%

ESPP

 

 

1.1

%

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

0.3

%

Expected term (in years):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

6.2

 

 

 

5.4

 

ESPP

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

Expected volatility:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

 

42

%

 

 

47

%

 

 

48

%

ESPP

 

 

35

%

 

 

41

%

 

 

42

%

Dividend yield:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

ESPP

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

Grant date fair value per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

$

122.25

 

 

$

98.70

 

 

$

108.28

 

ESPP

 

$

75.05

 

 

$

51.31

 

 

$

58.77

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

0.26

%

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

2.5

%

Expected term (in years)

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

4.7

 

Expected volatility

 

 

69

%

 

 

48

%

 

 

42

%

Dividend yield

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

Grant date fair value per share (1)

 

$

216.14

 

 

$

22.32

 

 

$

24.38

 

(1)

Prior period results have been adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. See Note 1, Overview, for details.

 

The fair value of RSUs with service or service and performance conditions is measured on the grant date based on the closing fair market value of our common stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for zero-coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities approximating each grant’s expected life. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017, given our then limited history with employee grants, we used the “simplified” method in estimating the expected term of our employee grants; the simplified method utilizes the average of the time-to-vesting and the contractual life of the employee grant. Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2017, weWe use our historical data in estimating the expected term of our employee grants. The expected volatility is based on the average of the implied volatility of publicly traded options for our common stock and the historical volatility of our common stock.


2018 CEO Performance Award

In March 2018, our stockholders approved the Board of Directors’ grant of 101.3 million stock option awards to our CEO (the “2018 CEO Performance Award”), as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. The 2018 CEO Performance Award consists of 12 vesting tranches with a vesting schedule based entirely on the attainment of both operational milestones (performance conditions) and market conditions, assuming continued employment either as the CEO or as both Executive Chairman and Chief Product Officer and service through each vesting date. Each of the 12 vesting tranches of the 2018 CEO Performance Award will vest upon certification by the Board of Directors that both (i) the market capitalization milestone for such tranche, which begins at $100.0 billion for the first tranche and increases by increments of $50.0 billion thereafter (based on both a six calendar month trailing average and a 30 calendar day trailing average, counting only trading days), has been achieved, and (ii) any one of the following 8 operational milestones focused on total revenue or any one of the 8 operational milestones focused on Adjusted EBITDA have been achieved for the previous four consecutive fiscal quarters on an annualized basis. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders before interest expense, provision (benefit) for income taxes, depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation. Upon vesting and exercise, including the payment of the exercise price of $70.01 per share as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split, our CEO must hold shares that he acquires for five years post-exercise, other than a cashless exercise where shares are simultaneously sold to pay for the exercise price and any required tax withholding.

The achievement status of the operational milestones as of December 31, 2020 was as follows:

 

Total Annualized Revenue

 

Annualized Adjusted EBITDA

Milestone

(in billions)

 

 

Achievement Status

 

Milestone

(in billions)

 

 

Achievement Status

$

20.0

 

 

Achieved and certified

 

$

1.5

 

 

Achieved and certified

$

35.0

 

 

Probable

 

$

3.0

 

 

Achieved and certified

$

55.0

 

 

-

 

$

4.5

 

 

Achieved and certified

$

75.0

 

 

-

 

$

6.0

 

 

Probable

$

100.0

 

 

-

 

$

8.0

 

 

Probable

$

125.0

 

 

-

 

$

10.0

 

 

-

$

150.0

 

 

-

 

$

12.0

 

 

-

$

175.0

 

 

-

 

$

14.0

 

 

-

Stock-based compensation under the 2018 CEO Performance Award represents a non-cash expense and is recorded as a selling, general, and administrative operating expense in our consolidated statement of operations. In each quarter since the grant of the 2018 CEO Performance Award, we have recognized expense, generally on a pro-rated basis, for only the number of tranches (up to the maximum of 12 tranches) that corresponds to the number of operational milestones that have been achieved or have been determined probable of being achieved in the future, in accordance with the following principles.

On the grant date, a Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine for each tranche (i) a fixed amount of expense for such tranche and (ii) the future time when the market capitalization milestone for such tranche was expected to be achieved, or its “expected market capitalization milestone achievement time.” Separately, based on a subjective assessment of our future financial performance, each quarter we determine whether it is probable that we will achieve each operational milestone that has not previously been achieved or deemed probable of achievement and if so, the future time when we expect to achieve that operational milestone, or its “expected operational milestone achievement time.” When we first determine that an operational milestone has become probable of being achieved, we allocate the entire expense for the related tranche over the number of quarters between the grant date and the then-applicable “expected vesting time.” The “expected vesting time” at any given time is the later of (i) the expected operational milestone achievement time (if the related operational milestone has not yet been achieved) and (ii) the expected market capitalization milestone achievement time (if the related market capitalization milestone has not yet been achieved). We immediately recognize a catch-up expense for all accumulated expense for the quarters from the grant date through the quarter in which the operational milestone was first deemed probable of being achieved. Each quarter thereafter, we recognize the prorated portion of the then-remaining expense for the tranche based on the number of quarters between such quarter and the then-applicable expected vesting time, except that upon vesting of a tranche, all remaining expense for that tranche is immediately recognized.

As a result, we have experienced, and may experience in the future, significant catch-up expenses in quarters when one or more operational milestones are first determined to be probable of being achieved. Additionally, the expected market capitalization achievement times are generally later than the related expected operational milestone achievement times. Therefore, if market capitalization milestones are achieved earlier than originally forecasted, for example due to periods of rapid stock price appreciation, this has resulted, and may result in the future, in higher catch-up expenses and the remaining expenses being recognized over shorter periods of time at a higher per-quarter rate.


During the three months ended June 30, 2020, the first tranche of the 2018 CEO Performance Award vested upon certification by the Board of Directors that the market capitalization milestone of $100.0 billion and the operational milestone of $20.0 billion annualized revenue had been achieved. Therefore, the remaining unamortized expense of $22 million for that tranche, which was previously expected to be recognized ratably in future quarters as determined on the grant date, was accelerated into the second quarter of 2020. Additionally, the operational milestone of annualized Adjusted EBITDA of $4.5 billion became probable of being achieved during the second quarter of 2020 and consequently, we recognized a catch-up expense of $79 million in that quarter.

During the three months ended September 30, 2020, the second and third tranches of the 2018 CEO Performance Award vested upon certification by the Board of Directors that the market capitalization milestones of $150.0 billion and $200.0 billion and the operational milestones of annualized Adjusted EBITDA of $1.5 billion and annualized Adjusted EBITDA of $3.0 billion had been achieved. Therefore, the remaining unamortized expense of $95 million and $118 million associated with the second and third tranches, respectively, which were previously expected to be recognized ratably in future quarters as determined on the grant date were accelerated into the third quarter of 2020. Additionally, the operational milestone of annualized Adjusted EBITDA of $6.0 billion became probable of being achieved during the third quarter of 2020 and consequently, we recognized a catch-up expense of $77 million in that quarter.

During the three months ended December 31, 2020, the fourth tranche of the 2018 CEO Performance Award vested upon certification by the Board of Directors that the market capitalization milestone of $250.0 billion and the operational milestone of annualized Adjusted EBITDA of $4.5 billion had been achieved. Therefore, the remaining unamortized expense of $122 million for that tranche, which was previously expected to be recognized ratably in future quarters through the third quarter of 2023 as determined on the grant date, was accelerated into the fourth quarter of 2020. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2020, the operational milestone of annualized Adjusted EBITDA of $8.0 billion became probable of being achieved and consequently, we recognized a catch-up expense of $75 million in that quarter

   As of December 31, 2020, we had $264 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for the operational milestones that were considered either probable of achievement or achieved but not yet certified, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.6 years. As of December 31, 2020, we had unrecognized stock-based compensation expense of $712 million for the operational milestones that were considered not probable of achievement. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 we recorded stock-based compensation expense of $838 million, $296 million and $175 million related to the 2018 CEO Performance Award.

2014 Performance-Based Stock Option Awards

In 2014, to create incentives for continued long-term success beyond the Model S program and to closely align executive pay with our stockholders’ interests in the achievement of significant milestones by us, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors granted stock option awards to certain employees (excluding our CEO) to purchase an aggregate of 1,073,0005.4 million shares of our common stock.stock, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. Each award consisted of the following four4 vesting tranches with the vesting schedule based entirely on the attainment of the future performance milestones, assuming continued employment and service through each vesting date:

1/4th of each award vests upon completion of the first Model X production vehicle;

1/4th of each award vests upon completion of the first Model X production vehicle;

1/4th of each award vests upon achieving aggregate production of 100,000 vehicles in a trailing 12-month period;

1/4th of each award vests upon achieving aggregate production of 100,000 vehicles in a trailing 12-month period;

1/4th of each award vests upon completion of the first Model 3 production vehicle; and

1/4th of each award vests upon completion of the first Model 3 production vehicle; and

1/4th of each award vests upon achieving an annualized gross margin of greater than 30% for any three-year period.

1/4th of each award vests upon achieving an annualized gross margin of greater than 30% for any three-year period.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the following performance milestones had been achieved:

Completion of the first Model X production vehicle;

Completion of the first Model X production vehicle;

Completion of the first Model 3 production vehicle; and

Completion of the first Model 3 production vehicle; and

Aggregate production of 100,000 vehicles in a trailing 12-month period.

Aggregate production of 100,000 vehicles in a trailing 12-month period.

We begin recognizing stock-based compensation expense as each performance milestone becomes probable of achievement. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had unrecognized stock-based compensation expense of $13.1$4 million for the performance milestone that was considered not probable of achievement. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, we recordeddid 0t record any additional stock-based compensation expense of $6.8 million, $25.3 million and $10.4 million, respectively, related to these awards.the 2014 Performance-Based Stock Option Awards.


2012 CEO Performance Award

In August 2012, our Board of Directors granted 5,274,90126.4 million stock option awards to our CEO (the “2012 CEO Grant”Performance Award”)., as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split. The 2012 CEO GrantPerformance Award consists of 10 vesting tranches with a vesting schedule based entirely on the attainment of both performance conditions and market conditions, assuming continued employment and service through each vesting date. Each vesting tranche requires a combination of a pre-determined performance milestone and an incremental increase in our market capitalization of $4.00 billion, as compared to our initial market capitalization of $3.20 billion at the time of grant. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the market capitalization conditions for all of the vesting tranches and the following performance milestones had been achieved:

Successful completion of the Model X alpha prototype;

Successful completion of the Model X alpha prototype;

Successful completion of the Model X beta prototype;

Successful completion of the Model X beta prototype;

Completion of the first Model X production vehicle;

Completion of the first Model X production vehicle;

Aggregate production of 100,000 vehicles;

Aggregate production of 100,000 vehicles;

Successful completion of the Model 3 alpha prototype;

Successful completion of the Model 3 alpha prototype;

Successful completion of the Model 3 beta prototype;

Successful completion of the Model 3 beta prototype;

Completion of the first Model 3 production vehicle; and

Completion of the first Model 3 production vehicle;

Aggregate production of 200,000 vehicles; and

Aggregate production of 200,000 vehicles.

Aggregate production of 300,000 vehicles.

As of December 31, 2017, the following performance milestone was considered probable of achievement:

Aggregate production of 300,000 vehicles.

We begin recognizing stock-basedstock-based compensation expense as each milestone becomes probable of achievement. As of December 31, 2017, the2020, we had unrecognized stock-based compensation expense of $6 million for the performance milestone that was considered probable of achievement was immaterial. As of December 31, 2017, we had unrecognized stock-based compensation expense of $5.7 million for the performance milestone that was considered


not probable of achievement. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015,2019, we recordeddid 0t record any additional stock-based compensation expense of $5.1 million, $15.8 million and $10.6 million, respectively, related to the 2012 CEO Grant.

Our CEO earns a base salary that reflectsPerformance Award. For the currently applicable minimum wage requirements under California law, and he is subjectyear ended December 31, 2018, the stock-based compensation we recorded related to income taxes based on such base salary. However, he has never accepted and currently does not accept his salary.this award was immaterial.

Summary Stock-Based Compensation Information

The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation expense by line item in the consolidated statements of operations (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Cost of sales

 

$

43,845

 

 

$

30,400

 

 

$

19,244

 

Cost of revenues

 

$

281

 

 

$

128

 

 

$

109

 

Research and development

 

 

217,616

 

 

 

154,632

 

 

 

89,309

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

285

 

 

 

261

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

205,299

 

 

 

149,193

 

 

 

89,446

 

 

 

1,107

 

 

 

482

 

 

 

375

 

Restructuring and other

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

4

 

Total

 

$

466,760

 

 

$

334,225

 

 

$

197,999

 

 

$

1,734

 

 

$

898

 

 

$

749

 

We realized no

Our income tax benefitbenefits recognized from stock option exercisesstock-based compensation arrangements in each of the periods presented were immaterial due to recurringcumulative losses and valuation allowances. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, stock-based compensation expense capitalized to our consolidated balance sheets was $89 million, $52 million and $18 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $1.34$3.51 billion of total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-performance awards, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.02.7 years.

ESPP

Our employees are eligible to purchase our common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15% of their eligible compensation, subject to any plan limitations. The purchase price would be 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first and last trading days of each six-month offering period. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we issued 370,173, 321,788 and 220,571 shares under the ESPP for $71.0 million, $51.7 million and $37.5 million, respectively. There were 1,423,978 shares available for issuance under the ESPP as of December 31, 2017.

 


Note 1615 – Income Taxes

A provision for income taxes of $31.5$292 million, $26.7$110 million and $13.0$58 million has been recognized for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, related primarily to our subsidiaries located outside of the U.S. Our lossincome (loss) before provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Domestic

 

$

993,113

 

 

$

130,718

 

 

$

415,694

 

 

$

(198

)

 

$

(287

)

 

$

(412

)

Noncontrolling interest and redeemable

noncontrolling interest

 

 

279,178

 

 

 

98,132

 

 

 

 

 

 

141

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

(87

)

Foreign

 

 

936,741

 

 

 

517,498

 

 

 

459,930

 

 

 

1,211

 

 

 

(465

)

 

 

(506

)

Loss before income taxes

 

$

2,209,032

 

 

$

746,348

 

 

$

875,624

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

$

1,154

 

 

$

(665

)

 

$

(1,005

)

 


The components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

(1

)

State

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

3

 

Foreign

 

 

248

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

24

 

Total current

 

 

252

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

26

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

State

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign

 

 

40

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

32

 

Total deferred

 

 

40

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

32

 

Total provision for income taxes

 

$

292

 

 

$

110

 

 

$

58

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

(9,552

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

State

 

 

2,029

 

 

 

568

 

 

 

525

 

Foreign

 

 

42,715

 

 

 

53,962

 

 

 

10,342

 

Total current

 

 

35,192

 

 

 

54,530

 

 

 

10,867

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign

 

 

(3,646

)

 

 

(27,832

)

 

 

2,172

 

Total deferred

 

 

(3,646

)

 

 

(27,832

)

 

 

2,172

 

Total provision for income taxes

 

$

31,546

 

 

$

26,698

 

 

$

13,039

 

On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) was enacted into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a federal corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. We are required to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment, such as re-measuring our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities as well as reassessing the net realizability of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Tax Act did not give rise to any material impact on the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations due to our historical worldwide loss position and the full valuation allowance on our net U.S. deferred tax assets.

In December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“SAB 118”), which allows us to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year from the enactment date. Since the Tax Act was enacted late in the fourth quarter of 2017 (and ongoing guidance and accounting interpretations are expected over the next 12 months), we consider the accounting of deferred tax re-measurements and other items, such as state tax considerations, to be incomplete due to the forthcoming guidance and our ongoing analysis of final year-end data and tax positions. We expect to complete our analysis within the measurement period in accordance with SAB 118. We do not expect any subsequent adjustments to have any material impact on the consolidated balance sheets or statements of operations due to our historical worldwide loss position and the full valuation allowance on our net U.S. deferred tax assets.


Deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 consisted of the following (in thousands)millions):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss carry-forwards

 

$

1,575,952

 

 

$

648,652

 

 

$

2,172

 

 

$

1,846

 

Research and development credits

 

 

306,808

 

 

 

208,499

 

 

 

624

 

 

 

486

 

Other tax credits

 

 

117,997

 

 

 

106,530

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

126

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

200,531

 

 

 

268,434

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

301

 

Inventory and warranty reserves

 

 

74,578

 

 

 

95,570

 

 

 

315

 

 

 

243

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

96,916

 

 

 

120,955

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

102

 

Financial Instruments

 

 

3,080

 

 

 

 

Investment in certain financing funds

 

 

24,471

 

 

 

237,759

 

Operating lease right-of-use liabilities

 

 

335

 

 

 

290

 

Deferred GILTI tax assets

 

 

581

 

 

 

 

Accruals and others

 

 

23,336

 

 

 

67,769

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

16

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

2,423,669

 

 

 

1,754,168

 

 

 

4,948

 

 

 

3,410

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(1,843,713

)

 

 

(1,022,705

)

 

 

(2,930

)

 

 

(1,956

)

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

 

579,956

 

 

 

731,463

 

 

 

2,018

 

 

 

1,454

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(537,613

)

 

 

(679,969

)

 

 

(1,488

)

 

 

(1,185

)

Investment in certain financing funds

 

 

(198

)

 

 

(17

)

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

(305

)

 

 

(263

)

Deferred revenue

 

 

(50

)

 

 

 

Other

 

 

(18,734

)

 

 

(3,779

)

 

 

(61

)

 

 

(24

)

Financial Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

(22,033

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(556,347

)

 

 

(705,781

)

 

 

(2,102

)

 

 

(1,489

)

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

and deferred tax liabilities

 

$

23,609

 

 

$

25,682

 

Deferred tax liabilities, net of valuation allowance

and deferred tax assets

 

$

(84

)

 

$

(35

)


As of December 31, 2017,2020, we recorded a valuation allowance of $1.84$2.93 billion for the portion of the deferred tax asset that we do not expect to be realized. The valuation allowance on our net deferred taxes increased by $821.0$974 million, increased by $150 million, and decreased by $38 million during the yearyears ended December 31, 2017.2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The changes in valuation allowance increase isare primarily due to additional U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities incurred in the current year, as well as an increase relating to adoption of ASU 2016-09, and offset by the re-measurement of the federal portion of our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017 from 35% to the new 21% tax rate. Management believes that based on the available information, it is more likely than not that the U.S. deferred tax assets will not be realized, such that a full valuation allowance is required against all U.S. deferred tax assets.respective year. We have net $46.5$260 million of deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions, which management believes are more-likely-than-not to be fully realized given the expectation of future earnings in these jurisdictions. We did not have material release of valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. We continue to monitor the realizability of the U.S. deferred tax assets taking into account multiple factors, including the results of operations and magnitude of excess tax deductions for stock-based compensation. We intend to continue maintaining a full valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets until there is sufficient evidence to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances. Given the improvement in our operating results and depending on the amount of stock-based compensation tax deduction available in the future, we may release the valuation allowance associated with the U.S. deferred tax assets in the next few years. Release of all, or a portion, of the valuation allowance would result in the recognition of certain deferred tax assets and a decrease to income tax expense for the period the release is recorded.

 


The reconciliation of taxes at the federal statutory rate to our provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 was as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Tax at statutory federal rate

 

$

(773,162

)

 

$

(261,222

)

 

$

(306,470

)

 

$

242

 

 

$

(139

)

 

$

(211

)

State tax, net of federal benefit

 

 

2,029

 

 

 

568

 

 

 

525

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

3

 

Nondeductible expenses

 

 

30,138

 

 

 

26,547

 

 

 

16,711

 

Excess tax benefits related to stock based

compensation (1)

 

 

(1,013,196

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nondeductible executive compensations

 

 

184

 

 

 

62

 

 

 

39

 

Other nondeductible expenses

 

 

52

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

26

 

Excess tax benefits related to stock based

compensation

 

 

(666

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(44

)

Foreign income rate differential

 

 

364,699

 

 

 

206,470

 

 

 

172,259

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

189

 

 

 

161

 

U.S. tax credits

 

 

(109,501

)

 

 

(162,865

)

 

 

(43,911

)

 

 

(181

)

 

 

(107

)

 

 

(80

)

Noncontrolling interests and redeemable

noncontrolling interests adjustment

 

 

65,920

 

 

 

21,964

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

(29

)

 

 

32

 

Effect of U.S. tax law change (2)

 

 

722,646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bargain in purchase gain

 

 

20,211

 

 

 

(31,055

)

 

 

 

Other reconciling items

 

 

3,178

 

 

 

785

 

 

 

1,232

 

GILTI inclusion

 

 

133

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible debt

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits

 

 

1

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

1

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

718,584

 

 

 

225,506

 

 

 

172,693

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

131

 

Provision for income taxes

 

$

31,546

 

 

$

26,698

 

 

$

13,039

 

 

$

292

 

 

$

110

 

 

$

58

 

 

(1)

As of January 1, 2017, upon the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-based Payment Accounting, excess tax benefits from share-based award activity incurred from the prior and current years are reflected as a reduction of the provision for income taxes. The excess tax benefits result in an increase to our gross U.S. deferred tax assets that is offset by a corresponding increase to our valuation allowance.

(2)

Due to the Tax Act, our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2017 were re-measured from 35% to 21%. The change in tax rate resulted in a decrease to our gross U.S. deferred tax assets which is offset by a corresponding decrease to our valuation allowance.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $6.42$9.65 billion of federal and $5.26$6.60 billion of state net operating loss carry-forwards available to offset future taxable income, which will not begin to significantly expire until 2024 for federal and 20282031 for state purposes. A portion of these losses were generated by SolarCity prior to our acquisition in 2016and some of the companies we acquired, and therefore are subject to change of control provisions, which limit the amount of acquired tax attributes that can be utilized in a given tax year. We do not expect these change of control limitations to significantly impact our ability to utilize these attributes. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-09, our gross U.S. deferred tax assets increased by $583.4 million, inclusive of the effect for the U.S. statutory corporate tax rate reduction from 35% to 21%, and is fully offset by a corresponding increase to our valuation allowance.

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had research and development tax credits of $209.0$417 million and $223.2$373 million for federal and state income tax purposes, respectively. If not utilized, the federal research and development tax credits will expire in various amounts beginning in 2024. However, the state of California research and development tax credits can be carried-forwardcarried forward indefinitely. In addition, we hadhave other general business tax credits of $116.9$167 million for federal income tax purposes, which will not begin to significantly expire until 2033.

Collectively, we hadFederal and state laws can impose substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards in the event of an “ownership change,” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. We have determined that no foreign earnings assignificant limitation would be placed on the utilization of December 31, 2017our net operating loss and therefore was not subjecttax credit carry-forwards due to prior ownership changes.

The local government of Shanghai granted a beneficial corporate income tax rate of 15% to certain eligible enterprises, compared to the mandatory repatriation25% statutory corporate income tax provisionsrate in China. Our Gigafactory Shanghai subsidiary was granted this beneficial income tax rate of the Tax Act. However, some of our foreign subsidiaries do have accumulated earnings. No15% for 2019 through 2023.

NaN deferred tax liabilities for foreign withholding taxes have been recorded relating to the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries since all such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested. The amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability associated with these earnings is immaterial.

Federal and state laws can impose substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards in the event of an “ownership change”, as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. We determined that no significant limitation would be placed on the utilization of our net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards due to prior ownership changes.


Uncertain Tax Positions

The changes to our gross unrecognized tax benefits were as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

$

41,377

 

Increases in balances related to prior year tax positions

 

 

6,626

 

Increases in balances related to current year tax

   positions

 

 

51,124

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

99,127

 

Increase in balances related to prior year tax positions

 

 

28,677

 

Increases in balances related to current year tax

   positions

 

 

62,805

 

Assumed uncertain tax positions through acquisition

 

 

13,327

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

203,936

 

Decrease in balances related to prior year tax positions

 

 

(31,493

)

Increases in balances related to current year tax

   positions

 

 

84,352

 

Change in balances related to effect of U.S. tax law

   change

 

 

(58,050

)

December 31, 2017

 

$

198,745

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

$

199

 

Decreases in balances related to prior year tax positions

 

 

(6

)

Increases in balances related to current year tax

   positions

 

 

60

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

253

 

Decreases in balances related to prior year tax positions

 

 

(39

)

Increases in balances related to current year tax

   positions

 

 

59

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

273

 

Increases in balances related to prior year tax positions

 

 

66

 

Increases in balances related to current year tax

   positions

 

 

41

 

December 31, 2020

 

$

380

 

As of December 31, 2017,2020, accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified as income tax expense and were immaterial. Unrecognized tax benefits of $191.0$353 million, if recognized, would not affect our effective tax rate since the tax benefits would increase a deferred tax asset that is currently fully offset by a full valuation allowance. We do not anticipate that the amount of existing unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.

We file income tax returns in the U.S., California and various state and foreign jurisdictions. TaxWe are currently under examination by the IRS for the years 2015 to 2018. Additional tax years within the period 2004 to 20162014 and 2019 remain subject to examination for federal income tax purposes, and tax years 2004 to 20162019 remain subject to examination for California income tax purposes. All net operating losses and tax credits generated to date are subject to adjustment for U.S. federal and California income tax purposes. Tax years 2008 to 20162019 remain subject to examination in other U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions.

The potential outcome of the current examination could result in a change to unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months. However, we cannot reasonably estimate possible adjustments at this time.  

The U.S. Tax Court issued a decision in Altera Corp v. Commissioner related to the treatment of stock-based compensation expense in a cost-sharing arrangement. As thisOn June 7, 2019, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) reversed the Tax Court decision canand upheld the validity of Treas. Reg. Section 1.482-7A(d)(2), requiring stock-based compensation costs be overturned upon appeal, we have not recorded any impact as of December 31, 2017. In addition, any potential tax benefits would increase ourincluded in the costs shared under a cost sharing agreement. On June 22, 2020, the U.S. deferred tax asset, which is currently offset with a full valuation allowance.

Supreme Court denied to review the Ninth Circuit decision.  Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court’s denial, Tesla has already included stock-based compensation in cost sharing allocation agreement and hence retains its position.

Note 17 –16 ��� Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

We have entered into various non-cancellable operating lease agreements for certain of our offices, manufacturing and warehouse facilities, retail and service locations, equipment, vehicles, solar energy systems and Supercharger sites, throughout the world. Included within the lease commitment table below are payments due under operating leases that have been accounted for as build-to-suit lease arrangements, which are included in property, plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $177.7million, $116.8million and $68.2 million, respectively.

We have entered into various agreements to lease equipment under capital leases up to 60 months. The equipment under the leases are collateral for the lease obligations and are included within property, plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets.


Future minimum commitments for leases as of December31, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Operating

 

 

Capital

 

 

 

Leases

 

 

Leases

 

2018

 

$

224,630

 

 

$

127,180

 

2019

 

 

204,335

 

 

 

137,313

 

2020

 

 

175,612

 

 

 

167,281

 

2021

 

 

156,552

 

 

 

138,042

 

2022

 

 

130,802

 

 

 

133,772

 

Thereafter

 

 

425,295

 

 

 

81,627

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

1,317,226

 

 

 

785,215

 

Less: Amounts representing interest not yet incurred

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,181

 

Present value of capital lease obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

686,034

 

Less: Current portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

96,700

 

Long-term portion of capital lease obligations

 

 

 

 

 

$

589,334

 

Build-to-SuitOperating Lease Arrangement in Buffalo, New York

We have a build-to-suitan operating lease arrangement withthrough the Research Foundation for the State University of New York (the “SUNY Foundation”) wherewith respect to Gigafactory New York. Under the SUNY Foundation will constructlease and a solar cellrelated research and panel manufacturing facility, referreddevelopment agreement, we are continuing to as Gigafactory 2, with our participation indesignate further buildouts at the design and construction, install certain utilities and other improvements and acquire certain manufacturing equipment designated by us to be used in the manufacturing facility. The SUNY Foundation coverscovered (i) construction costs related to the manufacturing facility up to $350.0$350 million, (ii) the acquisition and commissioning of the manufacturing equipment in an amount up to $274.7$275 million and (iii) $125.3$125 million for additional specified scope costs, in cases (i) and (ii) only, subject to the maximum funding allocation from the State of New York; and we arewere responsible for any construction or equipment costs in excess of such amounts. The SUNY Foundation will ownowns the manufacturing facility and the manufacturing equipment purchased by the SUNY Foundation. Following completion of the manufacturing facility, we will leasehave commenced leasing of the manufacturing facility and the manufacturing equipment owned by the SUNY Foundation for an initial period of 10 years, with an option to renew, for $2.00 per year plus utilities.

Under the terms of the build-to-suit lease arrangement,this agreement, we are requiredobligated to, achieve specific operational milestones during the initial lease term; which include employing a certain numberamong other things, meet employment targets as well as specified minimum numbers of employees at the manufacturing facility, within western New York and withinpersonnel in the State of New York within specified periods following the completion of the manufacturing facility. We are also required toand in Buffalo, New York and spend or incur $5.00 billion in combined capital, operational expenses, costs of goods sold and other costs in the State of New York within 10 years followingduring the achievement of full production.10-year period beginning April 30, 2018. On an annual basis during the initial lease term, as measured on each anniversary of the commissioning of the manufacturing facility,such date, if we fail to meet these specified investment and job creation requirements, then we would be obligated to pay a $41.2$41 million “program payment” to the SUNY Foundation for each year that we fail to meet these requirements. Furthermore, if the arrangement is terminated due to a material breach by us, then additional amounts mightmay become payable by us.


The non-cash investingAs we temporarily suspended most of our manufacturing operations at Gigafactory New York pursuant to a New York State executive order issued in March 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we were granted a one-year deferral of our obligation to be compliant with our applicable targets under such agreement on April 30, 2020, which was memorialized in an amendment to our agreement with the SUNY Foundation in July 2020. Moreover, we had exceeded our investment and financing activities relatedemployment obligations under this agreement prior to such mandated reduction of operations. We do not currently expect any issues meeting all applicable future obligations under this agreement. However, if our expectations as to the arrangement duringcosts and timelines of our investment and operations at Buffalo or our production ramp of the year ended December 31, 2017 amounted to $86.1 million. The non-cash investing and financing activities relatedSolar Roof prove incorrect, we may incur additional expenses or substantial payments to the SUNY Foundation.

Operating Lease Arrangement in Shanghai, China

We have an operating lease arrangement fromfor an initial term of 50 years with the Acquisition Date through December 31, 2016 amounted to $5.6 million.

Environmental Liabilities

In connection with our factory located in Fremont, California,local government of Shanghai for land use rights where we are obligatedconstructing Gigafactory Shanghai. Under the terms of the arrangement, we are required to payspend RMB 14.08 billion in capital expenditures, and to generate RMB 2.23 billion of annual tax revenues starting at the end of 2023. If we are unwilling or unable to meet such target or obtain periodic project approvals, in accordance with the Chinese government’s standard terms for such arrangements, we would be required to revert the site to the local government and receive compensation for the remediationremaining value of certain environmental conditions existing at the time we purchasedland lease, buildings and fixtures. We believe the property from New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (“NUMMI”). In particular,capital expenditure requirement and the tax revenue target will be attainable even if our actual vehicle production was far lower than the volumes we are responsible for the first $15.0 million of remediation costs, any remediation costs in excess of $30.0 million and any remediation costs incurred after 10 years from the purchase date. NUMMI is responsible for any remediation costs between $15.0 million and $30.0 million for up to 10 years after the purchase date.forecasting.


Legal Proceedings

Proceedings Related to U.S. Treasury

In July 2012, SolarCity, along with other companies in the solar energy industry, received a subpoena from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of the Inspector General to deliver certain documents in SolarCity’s possession that relate to SolarCity’s applications for U.S. Treasury grants. In February 2013, two financing funds affiliated with SolarCity filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims against the U.S. government, seeking to recover $14.0 million that the U.S. Treasury was obligated to pay, but failed to pay, under Section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. In February 2016, the U.S. government filed a motion seeking leave to assert a counterclaim against the two plaintiff funds on the grounds that the U.S. government, in fact, paid them more, not less, than they were entitled to as a matter of law. In September 2017, SolarCity and the U.S. government reached a global settlement of both the investigation and SolarCity’s lawsuit. In that settlement, SolarCity admitted no wrongdoing and agreed to return approximately 5% of the U.S. Treasury cash grants it had received between 2009 and 2013, amounting to $29.5 million. The investigation is now closed and SolarCity’s lawsuit has been dismissed.

Securities Litigation Relating to SolarCity’s Financial Statements and Guidance

On March 28, 2014, a purported stockholder class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against SolarCity and two of its officers. The complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of SolarCity’s securities from March 6, 2013 to March 18, 2014. After a series of amendments to the original complaint, the District Court dismissed the amended complaint and entered a judgment in our favor on August 9, 2016. The plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal. On December 4, 2017, the District Court heard oral arguments on the plaintiffs’ notice of appeal from the dismissal. We believe that the claims are without merit and intend to defend against this lawsuit and appeal vigorously. We are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this lawsuit.

On August 15, 2016, a purported stockholder class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against SolarCity, two of its officers and a former officer. On March 20, 2017, the purported stockholder class filed a consolidated complaint that includes the original matter in the same court against SolarCity, one of its officers and three former officers. As consolidated, the complaint alleges that SolarCity made projections of future sales and installations that it failed to achieve and that these projections were fraudulent when made. The suit claimed violations of federal securities laws and sought unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of SolarCity’s securities from May 6, 2015 to May 9, 2016. On July 25, 2017, the court took SolarCity’s fully-briefed motion to dismiss under submission. On August 11, 2017, the court granted the motion to dismiss with leave to amend. On September 11, 2017, after lead plaintiff determined he would not amend, the Court dismissed the action with prejudice and entered judgment in favor of SolarCity and the individual defendants.

Securities Litigation Relating to the SolarCity Acquisition

Between September 1, 2016 and October 5, 2016, seven 7 lawsuits were filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware by purported stockholders of Tesla challenging theour acquisition of SolarCity acquisition.Corporation (“SolarCity”). Following consolidation, the lawsuit names as defendants ourthe members of Tesla’s board of directors as then constituted and alleges, among other things, that theyboard members breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the acquisition. The complaint asserts both derivative claims and direct claims on behalf of a purported class and seeks, among other relief, unspecified monetary damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. On January27, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the operative complaint. Rather than respond to the defendants’ motion, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On March17, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On December13, 2017, the Court heard oral argumentsargument on the motion. On March28, 2018, the Court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss. Defendants filed a request for interlocutory appeal, and the Delaware Supreme Court denied that request without ruling on the merits but electing not to hear an appeal at this early stage of the case. Defendants filed their answer on May 18, 2018, and mediations were held on June 10, 2019. Plaintiffs and defendants filed respective motions for summary judgment on August 25, 2019, and further mediations were held on October 3, 2019. The Court held a hearing on the motions for summary judgment on November 4, 2019. On January 22, 2020, all of the director defendants except Elon Musk reached a settlement to resolve the lawsuit against them for an amount that would be paid entirely under the applicable insurance policy. The settlement, which does not involve an admission of any wrongdoing by any party, was approved by the Court on August 17, 2020. Tesla received payment of approximately $43 million on September 16, 2020, which has been recognized in our consolidated statement of operations as a reduction to selling, general and administrative operating expenses for costs previously incurred in the securities litigation related to the acquisition of SolarCity. On February 4, 2020, the Court issued a ruling that denied plaintiffs’ previously-filed motion and reserved decision.granted in part and denied in part defendants’ previously-filed motion. Fact and expert discovery is complete, and the case was set for trial in March 2020 until it was postponed by the Court due to safety precautions concerning COVID-19. The current tentative dates for the trial are from July 12 to July 23, 2021, subject to change based on any further safety measures implemented by the Court.

These plaintiffs and others filed a parallel actionactions in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on or about April21, 2017, adding2017. They include claims for violations of the federal securities laws.

On February 6, 2017, a purported stockholder made a demand to inspect our bookslaws and records, purportedly to investigate potential breachesbreach of fiduciary duties in connection with the SolarCity acquisition. On April 17, 2017, the purported stockholder filed a petition for a writ of mandate in the California Superior Court, seeking to compel us to provide the documents requested in the demand. We filed a demurrer to the writ petition or, in the alternative, a


motion to stay the action. On November 9, 2017, the Superior Court granted our motion and dismissed the action without prejudice.

On March 24, 2017, another lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware by a purported Tesla stockholder challenging the SolarCity acquisition. The complaint alleges, among other things, that ourTesla’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection withdirectors. Those actions have been consolidated and stayed pending the acquisition and alleges violations of federal securities laws.above-referenced Chancery Court litigation.

We believe that the claims challenging the SolarCity acquisition are without merit.merit and intend to defend against them vigorously. We are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with these lawsuits.claims.


Securities Litigation Relating to Production of Model 3 Vehicles

On October10, 2017, a purported stockholder class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against us,Tesla, two of ourits current officers, and a former officer. The complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of Tesla securities from May4, 2016 to October6, 2017. The lawsuit claims that weTesla supposedly made materially false and misleading statements regarding ourTesla’s preparedness to produce Model 3 vehicles. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on March23, 2018, and defendants filed a motion to dismiss on May25, 2018. The court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss with leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed their amended complaint on September 28, 2018, and defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on February 15, 2019.  The hearing on the motion to dismiss was held on March 22, 2019, and on March 25, 2019, the Court ruled in favor of defendants and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.  On April 8, 2019, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal and on July 17, 2019 filed their opening brief. We filed our opposition on September 16, 2019. A hearing on the appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (“Ninth Circuit”) was held on April 30, 2020. On January 26, 2021, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the stockholder claims. We continue to believe that the claims are without merit and intend to defend against this lawsuit vigorously. We are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this lawsuit.

On October 26, 2018, in a similar action, a purported stockholder class action was filed in the Superior Court of California in Santa Clara County against Tesla, Elon Musk, and seven initial purchasers in an offering of debt securities by Tesla in August 2017. The complaint alleges misrepresentations made by Tesla regarding the number of Model 3 vehicles Tesla expected to produce by the end of 2017 in connection with such offering and seeks unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of Tesla securities in such offering. Tesla thereafter removed the case to federal court. On January 22, 2019, plaintiff abandoned its effort to proceed in state court, instead filing an amended complaint against Tesla, Elon Musk and seven initial purchasers in the debt offering before the same judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California who is hearing the above-referenced earlier filed federal case. On February 5, 2019, the Court stayed this new case pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss the complaint in such earlier filed federal case. After such earlier filed federal case was dismissed, defendants filed a motion on July 2, 2019 to dismiss this case as well. This case is now stayed pending a ruling from the Ninth Circuit on the earlier filed federal case with an agreement that if defendants prevail on appeal in such case, this case will be dismissed. We believe that the claims are without merit and intend to defend against this lawsuit vigorously. We are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this lawsuit.

Litigation Relating to 2018 CEO Performance Award

On June 4, 2018, a purported Tesla stockholder filed a putative class and derivative action in the Delaware Court of Chancery against Elon Musk and the members of Tesla’s board of directors as then constituted, alleging corporate waste, unjust enrichment, and that such board members breached their fiduciary duties by approving the stock-based compensation plan. The complaint seeks, among other things, monetary damages and rescission or reformation of the stock-based compensation plan. On August 31, 2018, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint; plaintiff filed its opposition brief on November 1, 2018 and defendants filed a reply brief on December 13, 2018. The hearing on the motion to dismiss was held on May 9, 2019. On September 20, 2019, the Court granted the motion to dismiss as to the corporate waste claim but denied the motion as to the breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment claims. Our answer was filed on December 3, 2019, and trial is set for April 2022. Fact discovery is ongoing. We believe the claims asserted in this lawsuit are without merit and intend to defend against them vigorously. We are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this lawsuit.

Litigation Related to Directors’ Compensation

On June 17, 2020, a purported Tesla stockholder filed a derivative action in the Delaware Court of Chancery, purportedly on behalf of Tesla, against certain of Tesla’s current and former directors regarding compensation awards granted to Tesla’s directors, other than Elon Musk, between 2017 and 2020. The suit asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, unspecified damages, and other relief. Defendants filed their answer on September 17, 2020. Trial is set for September 2022, and fact discovery is ongoing. We believe that the claims are without merit and intend to defend against this lawsuit vigorously. We are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this lawsuit.


Securities Litigation Relating to Potential Going Private Transaction

Between August 10, 2018 and September 6, 2018, nine purported stockholder class actions were filed against Tesla and Elon Musk in connection with Mr. Musk’s August 7, 2018 Twitter post that he was considering taking Tesla private. All of the suits are now pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Although the complaints vary in certain respects, they each purport to assert claims for violations of federal securities laws related to Mr. Musk’s statement and seek unspecified compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of Tesla’s securities. Plaintiffs filed their consolidated complaint on January 16, 2019 and added as defendants the members of Tesla’s board of directors. The now-consolidated purported stockholder class action was stayed while the issue of selection of lead counsel was briefed and argued before the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit ruled regarding lead counsel. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on November 22, 2019. The hearing on the motion was held on March 6, 2020. On April 15, 2020, the Court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss. The parties stipulated to certification of a class of stockholders, which the court granted on November 25, 2020. Trial is set for May 2022. We believe that the claims have no merit and intend to defend against them vigorously. We are unable to estimate the potential loss, or range of loss, associated with these claims.

Between October 17, 2018 and November 9, 2018, five derivative lawsuits were filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against Mr. Musk and the members of Tesla’s board of directors as then constituted in relation to statements made and actions connected to a potential going private transaction. In addition to these cases, on October 25, 2018, another derivative lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Mr. Musk and the members of the Tesla board of directors as then constituted. The Courts in both the Delaware federal court and Delaware Court of Chancery actions have consolidated their respective actions and stayed each consolidated action pending resolution of the above-referenced consolidated purported stockholder class action. We believe that the claims have no merit and intend to defend against them vigorously. We are unable to estimate the potential loss or range of loss, if any, associated with these lawsuits.

Beginning on March 7, 2019, various stockholders filed derivative suits in the Delaware Court of Chancery, purportedly on behalf of Tesla, naming Mr. Musk and Tesla’s board of directors as then constituted, also related to Mr. Musk’s August 7, 2018 Twitter post that is the basis of the above-referenced consolidated purported stockholder class action, as well as to Mr. Musk’s February 19, 2019 Twitter post regarding Tesla’s vehicle production. The suit asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, unspecified damages, and other relief. Plaintiffs agreed to a stipulation that these derivative cases would be stayed pending the outcome of the above-referenced consolidated purported stockholder class action. In March 2019, plaintiffs in one of these derivative suits moved to lift the stay and for an expedited trial. Briefs were filed on March 13, 2019, and the hearing was held on March 18, 2019. Defendants prevailed, with the Court denying the plaintiffs’ request for an expedited trial and granting defendants’ request to continue to stay this suit pending the outcome of the above-referenced consolidated purported stockholder class action. On May 4, 2020, the same plaintiffs again filed a motion requesting to lift the stay and for an expedited trial. Briefs were filed on May 13, 2020 and May 15, 2020 and a hearing was held on May 19, 2020. Defendants again prevailed, with the Court denying plaintiffs’ request to lift the stay and for an expedited trial. The plaintiffs also sought leave to file an amended complaint, which was granted. The Court entered an order implementing its ruling on May 21, 2020. The amended complaint asserts additional allegations of breach of fiduciary duty related to two additional Twitter posts by Mr. Musk, dated July 29, 2019 and May 1, 2020, and seeks unspecified damages and declaratory and injunctive relief. We believe that the claims have no merit and intend to defend against them vigorously. We are unable to estimate the potential loss or range of loss, if any, associated with these lawsuits.

Certain Investigations and Other Matters

From time to time, we have receivedWe receive requests for information from regulators and governmental authorities, such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the National Transportation Safety Board, the SEC, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and various state, federal, and international agencies. We routinely cooperate with such regulatory and governmental requests.

In particular, the SecuritiesSEC had issued subpoenas to Tesla in connection with (a) Elon Musk’s prior statement that he was considering taking Tesla private and Exchange Commission. (b) certain projections that we made for Model 3 production rates during 2017 and other public statements relating to Model 3 production. The take-private investigation was resolved and closed with a settlement entered into with the SEC in September 2018 and as further clarified in April 2019 in an amendment. On December 4, 2019, the SEC (i) closed the investigation into the projections and other public statements regarding Model 3 production rates and (ii) issued a subpoena seeking information concerning certain financial data and contracts including Tesla’s regular financing arrangements. Separately, the DOJ had also asked us to voluntarily provide it with information about the above matters related to taking Tesla private and Model 3 production rates.

Aside from the settlement, as amended, with the SEC relating to Mr. Musk’s statement that he was considering taking Tesla private, there have not been any developments in these matters that we deem to be material, and to our knowledge no government agency in any ongoing investigation has concluded that any wrongdoing occurred. As is our normal practice, we have been cooperating and will continue to cooperate with government authorities. We cannot predict the outcome or impact of any ongoing matters. Should the government decide to pursue an enforcement action, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our business, results of operation, prospects, cash flows, and financial position.


We are also subject to various other legal proceedings and claims that arise from the normal course of business activities. If an unfavorable ruling or development were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, prospects, cash flows, financial position, and brand.

Indemnification and Guaranteed Returns

We are contractually obligated to compensate certain fund investors for any losses that they may suffer in certain limited circumstances resulting from reductions in investment tax credits claimed under U.S. Treasury grants or ITCs.federal laws for the installation of solar power facilities and energy storage systems that are charged from a co-sited solar power facility (“ITC”s). Generally, such obligations would arise as a result of reductions to the value of the underlying solar energy systems as assessed by the U.S. Treasury DepartmentInternal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) for purposes of claiming U.S. Treasury grants or as assessed by the IRS for purposes of claiming ITCs or U.S. Treasury grants.ITCs. For each balance sheet date, we assess and recognize, when applicable, a distribution payable for the potential exposure from this obligation based on all the information available at that time, including any guidelines issued by the U.S. Treasury Department on solar energy system valuations for purposes of claiming U.S. Treasury grants and any audits undertaken by the IRS. We believe that any payments to the fund investors in excess of the amounts already recognized by us which were immaterial, for this obligation are not probable or material based on the facts known at the filing date.

The maximum potential future payments that we could have to make under this obligation would depend on the difference between the fair values of the solar energy systems sold or transferred to the funds as determined by us and the values that the U.S. Treasury Department would determine as fair value for the systems for purposes of claiming U.S. Treasury grants or the values the IRS would determine as the fair value for the systems for purposes of claiming ITCs or U.S. Treasury grants.ITCs. We claim U.S. Treasury grantsITCs based on guidelines provided by the U.S. Treasury department and the statutory regulations from the IRS. We use fair values determined with the assistance of independent third-party appraisals commissioned by us as the basis for determining the ITCs that are passed-through to and claimed by the fund investors. Since we cannot determine future revisions to U.S. Treasury Department guidelines governing solar energy system values orexactly how the IRS will evaluate system values used in claiming ITCs, or U.S. Treasury grants, we are unable to reliably estimate the maximum potential future payments that it could have to make under this obligation as of each balance sheet date.

We are eligible to receive certain state and local incentives that are associated with renewable energy generation. The amount of incentives that can be claimed is based on the projected or actual solar energy system size and/or the amount of solar energy produced. We also currently participate in one state’s incentive program that is based on either the fair market value or the tax basis of solar energy systems placed in service. State and local


incentives received are allocated between us and fund investors in accordance with the contractual provisions of each fund. We are not contractually obligated to indemnify any fund investor for any losses they may incur due to a shortfall in the amount of state or local incentives actually received.

We are contractually obligated to make payments to one fund investor if the fund investor does not achieve a specified minimum internal rate of return. The fund investor has already received a significant portion of the projected economic benefits from U.S. Treasury grant distributions and tax depreciation benefits. The contractual provisions of the fund state that the fund has an indefinite term unless the members agree to dissolve the fund. Based on our current financial projections regarding the amounts and timing of future distributions to the fund investor, we do not expect to make any payments as a result of this guarantee and have not accrued any liabilities for this guarantee. The amounts of any potential future payments under this guarantee are dependent on the amounts and timing of future distributions to the fund investor, future tax benefits that accrue to the fund investor, our purchase of the fund investor’s interest in the fund and future distributions to the fund investor upon the liquidation of the fund. Due to the uncertainties surrounding estimating the amounts and timing of these factors, we are unable to estimate the maximum potential payments under this guarantee. To date, the fund investor has achieved the specified minimum internal rate of return.

Our lease pass-through financing funds have a one-time lease payment reset mechanism that occurs after the installation of all solar energy systems in a fund. As a result of this mechanism, we may be required to refund master lease prepayments previously received from investors. Any refunds of master lease prepayments would reduce the lease pass-through financing obligation.

Letters of Credit

As of December 31, 2017,2020, we had $138.2$233 million of unused letters of credit outstanding.

 

Note 1817VIEVariable Interest Entity Arrangements

We have entered into various arrangements with investors to facilitate the funding and monetization of our solar energy systems and vehicles. In particular, our wholly owned subsidiaries and fund investors have formed and contributed cash and assets into various financing funds and entered into related agreements. We have determined that the funds are VIEsvariable interest entities (“VIEs”) and we are the primary beneficiary of these VIEs by reference to the power and benefits criterion under ASC 810, Consolidation. We have considered the provisions within the agreements, which grant us the power to manage and make decisions that affect the operation of these VIEs, including determining the solar energy systems or vehicles and the associated customer contracts to be sold or contributed to these VIEs, redeploying solar energy systems or vehicles and managing customer receivables. We consider that the rights granted to the fund investors under the agreements are more protective in nature rather than participating.

As the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, we consolidate in the financial statements the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of these VIEs, and all intercompany balances and transactions between us and these VIEs are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Cash distributions of income and other receipts by a fund, net of agreed upon expenses, estimated expenses, tax benefits and detriments of income and loss and tax credits, are allocated to the fund investor and our subsidiary as specified in the agreements.

Generally, our subsidiary has the option to acquire the fund investor’s interest in the fund for an amount based on the market value of the fund or the formula specified in the agreements.

Upon the sale or liquidation of a fund, distributions would occur in the order and priority specified in the agreements.

Pursuant to management services, maintenance and warranty arrangements, we have been contracted to provide services to the funds, such as operations and maintenance support, accounting, lease servicing and performance reporting. In some instances, we have guaranteed payments to the fund investors as specified in the agreements. A fund’s creditors have no recourse to our general credit or to that of other funds. None of the assets of the funds had been pledged as collateral for their obligations.


The aggregate carrying values of the VIEs’ assets and liabilities, after elimination of any intercompany transactions and balances, in the consolidated balance sheets were as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

55,425

 

 

$

44,091

 

 

$

87

 

 

$

106

 

Restricted cash

 

 

33,656

 

 

 

20,916

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

18,204

 

 

 

16,023

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

27

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

9,018

 

 

 

14,178

 

 

 

105

 

 

 

100

 

Total current assets

 

 

116,303

 

 

 

95,208

 

 

 

220

 

 

 

233

 

Operating lease vehicles, net

 

 

337,089

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,183

 

Solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net

 

 

5,075,321

 

 

 

4,618,443

 

Restricted cash, net of current portion

 

 

36,999

 

 

 

30,697

 

Other assets

 

 

29,555

 

 

 

5,129

 

Solar energy systems, net

 

 

4,749

 

 

 

5,030

 

Other non-current assets

 

 

182

 

 

 

156

 

Total assets

 

$

5,595,267

 

 

$

4,749,477

 

 

$

5,151

 

 

$

6,602

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

32

 

 

$

20

 

Accrued liabilities and other

 

 

51,652

 

 

 

32,242

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

80

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

59,412

 

 

 

17,114

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

78

 

Customer deposits

 

 

726

 

 

 

1,169

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

9

 

Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases

 

 

196,531

 

 

 

89,356

 

Current portion of debt and finance leases

 

 

797

 

 

 

608

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

308,353

 

 

 

139,901

 

 

 

885

 

 

 

775

 

Deferred revenue, net of current portion

 

 

323,919

 

 

 

178,783

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

264

 

Long-term debt and capital leases, net of current portion

 

 

625,934

 

 

 

466,741

 

Debt and finance leases, net of current portion

 

 

1,346

 

 

 

1,516

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

30,536

 

 

 

82,917

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

22

 

Total liabilities

 

$

1,288,742

 

 

$

868,342

 

 

$

2,418

 

 

$

2,577

 

 

 

Note 1918 – Lease Pass-Through Financing Obligation

Through December 31, 2017,2020, we had entered into eight8 transactions referred to as “lease pass-through fund arrangements”. Under these arrangements, our wholly owned subsidiaries finance the cost of solar energy systems with investors through arrangements contractually structured as master leases for an initial term ranging between 10 and 25 years. These solar energy systems are subject to lease or power purchase agreementsPPAs with customers with an initial term not exceeding 25 years. These solar energy systems are included within solar energy systems, leased and to be leased, net on the consolidated balance sheet.sheets.

The cost of the solar energy systems under lease pass-through fund arrangements as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 was $1.09 billion and $785.3 million, respectively.$1.05 billion. The accumulated depreciation on these assets as of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 was $30.9$137 million and $2.1$101 million, respectively. The total lease pass-through financing obligation as of December 31, 20172020 was $134.8$68 million, of which $67.3$41 million wasis classified as a current liability. The total lease pass-through financing obligation as of December 31, 20162019 was $122.3$94 million, of which $51.5$57 million was classified as a current liability. Lease pass-through financing obligation is included in accrued liabilities and other for the current portion and other long-term liabilities for the long-term portion on the consolidated balance sheets.

Under a lease pass-through fund arrangement, the investor makes a large upfront payment to the lessor, which is one of our subsidiaries, and in some cases, subsequent periodic payments. We allocate a portion of the aggregate investor payments to the fair value of the assigned ITCs, which is estimated by discounting the projected cash flow impact of the ITCs using a market interest rate and is accounted for separately (see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies).separately. We account for the remainder of the investor payments as a borrowing by recording the proceeds received as a lease pass-through financing obligation, which is repaid from the future customer lease payments and any incentive rebates. A portion of the amounts received by the investor is allocated to interest expense using the effective interest rate method.


The lease pass-through financing obligation is non-recourse once the associated solar energy systems have been placed in-service and the associated customer arrangements have been assigned to the investors. However, we are required to comply with certain financial covenants specified in the contractual agreements, which we had met as of December 31, 2017. In addition, we are responsible for any warranties, performance guarantees, accounting and performance reporting. Furthermore, we continue to account for the customer arrangements and any incentive rebates in the consolidated financial statements, regardless of whether the cash is received by us or directly by the investors.


As of December 31, 2017,2020, the future minimum master lease payments to be received from investors, for each of the next five years and thereafter, were as follows (in thousands)millions):

 

2018

 

$

44,771

 

2019

 

 

44,973

 

2020

 

 

43,930

 

2021

 

 

42,731

 

 

$

41

 

2022

 

 

34,631

 

 

 

33

 

2023

 

 

26

 

2024

 

 

18

 

2025

 

 

27

 

Thereafter

 

 

543,512

 

 

 

423

 

Total

 

$

754,548

 

 

$

568

 

For two of the lease pass-through fund arrangements, our subsidiaries have pledged its assets to the investors as security for its obligations under the contractual agreements.

Each lease pass-through fund arrangement has a one-time master lease prepayment adjustment mechanism that occurs when the capacity and the placed-in-service dates of the associated solar energy systems are finalized or on an agreed-upon date. As part of this mechanism, the master lease prepayment amount is updated, and we may be obligated to refund a portion of a master lease prepayment or entitled to receive an additional master lease prepayment. Any additional master lease prepayments are recorded as an additional lease pass-through financing obligation while any master lease prepayment refunds would reduce the lease pass-through financing obligation.

 

Note 2019 – Defined Contribution Plan

We have a 401(k) savings plan that qualifiesis intended to qualify as a deferred salary arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the 401(k) savings plan, participating employees may elect to contribute up to 100% of their eligible compensation, subject to certain limitations. Participants are fully vested in their contributions. We did not0t make any contributions to the 401(k) savings plan during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018 (other than employee deferrals of eligible compensation).

 

 

Note 2120 – Related Party Transactions

Related party balances were comprisedIn November 2018, our CEO purchased from us 284,575 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a per share price equal to the last closing price of our stock prior to the execution of the following (in thousands):purchase agreement for an aggregate $20 million, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split.

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Solar Bonds issued to related parties

 

$

100

 

 

$

265,100

 

Convertible senior notes due to related parties

 

$

3,000

 

 

$

13,000

 

Promissory notes due to related parties

 

$

100,000

 

 

$

 

Due to related parties (primarily accrued interest,

   included in accrued and other current liabilities)

 

$

2,509

 

 

$

5,136

 

The related party transactions were primarily issuances, maturities and exchanges of debt held by Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (“SpaceX”),In May 2019, our CEO SolarCity’s formerpurchased from us 514,400 shares of our common stock in a public offering at the public offering price for an aggregate $25 million, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split.

In February 2020, our CEO SolarCity’s former Chief Technology Officer and a member of our Board of Directors purchased from us 65,185 and 6,250 shares, respectively, of our common stock in a public offering at the public offering price for an entity affiliatedaggregate $10 million and $1 million, respectively, as adjusted to give effect to the Stock Split.

In June 2020, our CEO entered into an indemnification agreement with us for an interim term of 90 days. During the interim term, we resumed our annual evaluation of all available options for providing directors’ and officers’ indemnity coverage, which we had suspended during the height of shelter-in-place requirements related to the COVID-19 pandemic. As part of such process, we obtained a binding market quote for a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy with an aggregate coverage limit of $100 million.

Pursuant to the indemnification agreement, our CEO provided, from his personal funds, directors’ and officers’ indemnity coverage to us during the interim term in the event such coverage is not indemnifiable by us, up to a total of $100 million. In return, we paid our CEO a total of $3 million, which represents the market-based premium for the market quote described above as prorated for 90 days and further discounted by 50%. Following the lapse of the 90-day period, we did not extend the term of the indemnification agreement with our CEO. SpaceX is consideredCEO and instead bound a related party because our CEO is also the CEO, Chief Technology Officer, Chairmancustomary directors’ and a significant stockholder of SpaceX.

On March 21, 2017, $90.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.40% Solar Bonds held by SpaceX matured and were fully repaid by us. On June 10, 2017, $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.40% Solar Bonds held by SpaceX matured and were fully repaid by us.officers’ liability insurance policy with third-party carriers.

 


On April 11, 2017, our CEO, SolarCity’s former CEO and SolarCity’s former Chief Technology Officer exchanged their $100.0 million (collectively) in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% Solar Bonds due in February 2018 for promissory notes in the same amounts and with substantially the same terms.

On April 18, 2017, our CEO converted all of his Zero-Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due in 2020, which had an aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million (see Note 14, Common Stock).

Note 22 – Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The following table presents selected quarterly results of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31

 

 

June 30

 

 

September 30

 

 

December 31

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

2,696,270

 

 

$

2,789,557

 

 

$

2,984,675

 

 

$

3,288,249

 

Gross profit

 

$

667,946

 

 

$

666,615

 

 

$

449,140

 

 

$

438,786

 

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(330,277

)

 

$

(336,397

)

 

$

(619,376

)

 

$

(675,350

)

Net loss per share of common stock attributable to

   common stockholders, basic

 

$

(2.04

)

 

$

(2.04

)

 

$

(3.70

)

 

$

(4.01

)

Net loss per share of common stock attributable to

   common stockholders, diluted

 

$

(2.04

)

 

$

(2.04

)

 

$

(3.70

)

 

$

(4.01

)

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,147,048

 

 

$

1,270,017

 

 

$

2,298,436

 

 

$

2,284,631

 

Gross profit

 

$

252,468

 

 

$

274,776

 

 

$

636,735

 

 

$

435,278

 

Net (loss) income attributable to common

   stockholders

 

$

(282,267

)

 

$

(293,188

)

 

$

21,878

 

 

$

(121,337

)

Net (loss) income per share of common stock

   attributable to common stockholders, basic

 

$

(2.13

)

 

$

(2.09

)

 

$

0.15

 

 

$

(0.78

)

Net (loss) income per share of common stock

   attributable to common stockholders, diluted

 

$

(2.13

)

 

$

(2.09

)

 

$

0.14

 

 

$

(0.78

)

Note 2321 – Segment Reporting and Information about Geographic Areas

We have two2 operating and reportable segments: (i) automotive and (ii) energy generation and storage. The automotive segment includes the design, development, manufacturing, sales, and leasing of electric vehicles as well as sales of electric vehicles.automotive regulatory credits. Additionally, the automotive segment is also comprised of services and other, which includes non-warranty after-sales vehicle services, sales of used vehicles, retail merchandise, sales by our acquired subsidiaries to third party customers, and vehicle sales, powertrain sales and services by Grohmann.insurance revenue. The energy generation and storage segment includes the design, manufacture, installation, sales, and salesleasing of solar energy generation and energy storage products.products and related services and sales of solar energy systems incentives. Our CODM does not evaluate operating segments using asset or liability information. The following table presents revenues and gross marginsprofit by reportable segment (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Automotive segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

10,642,485

 

 

$

6,818,738

 

 

$

4,031,458

 

 

$

29,542

 

 

$

23,047

 

 

$

19,906

 

Gross profit

 

$

1,980,759

 

 

$

1,596,195

 

 

$

921,313

 

 

$

6,612

 

 

$

3,879

 

 

$

3,852

 

Energy generation and storage segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,116,266

 

 

$

181,394

 

 

$

14,477

 

 

$

1,994

 

 

$

1,531

 

 

$

1,555

 

Gross profit

 

$

241,728

 

 

$

3,062

 

 

$

2,190

 

 

$

18

 

 

$

190

 

 

$

190

 

 


The following table presents revenues by geographic area based on wherethe sales location of our products are delivered (in thousands)millions):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

United States

 

$

6,221,439

 

 

$

4,200,706

 

 

$

15,207

 

 

$

12,653

 

 

$

14,872

 

China

 

 

2,027,062

 

 

 

1,065,255

 

 

 

6,662

 

 

 

2,979

 

 

 

1,757

 

Norway

 

 

823,081

 

 

 

335,572

 

Other

 

 

2,687,169

 

 

 

1,398,599

 

 

 

9,667

 

 

 

8,946

 

 

 

4,832

 

Total

 

$

11,758,751

 

 

$

7,000,132

 

 

$

31,536

 

 

$

24,578

 

 

$

21,461

 

The revenues in certain geographic areas were impacted by the price adjustments we made to our vehicle offerings during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Refer to Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for details.

 

The following table presents long-lived assets by geographic area (in thousands)millions):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

United States

 

$

15,587,979

 

 

$

11,399,545

 

 

$

15,989

 

 

$

15,644

 

International

 

 

787,033

 

 

 

503,294

 

 

 

2,737

 

 

 

890

 

Total

 

$

16,375,012

 

 

$

11,902,839

 

 

$

18,726

 

 

$

16,534

 

Note 22 – Restructuring and Other

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we carried out certain restructuring actions in order to reduce costs and improve efficiency. As a result, we recognized $50 million of costs primarily related to employee termination expenses and losses from closing certain stores impacting both segments. We recognized $47 million in impairment related to the IPR&D intangible asset as we abandoned further development efforts and $15 million for the related equipment within the energy generation and storage segment. We also incurred a loss of $37 million for closing operations in certain facilities. On the statement of cash flows, the amounts were presented in the captions in which such amounts would have been recorded absent the impairment charges. The employee termination expenses were substantially paid by December 31, 2019, while the remaining amounts were non-cash.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we carried-out certain restructuring actions in order to reduce costs and improve efficiency and recognized $37 million of employee termination expenses and estimated losses from sub-leasing a certain facility. The employee termination cash expenses of $27 million were substantially paid by the end of 2018, while the remaining amounts were non-cash. Also included within restructuring and other activities was $55 million of expenses (materially all of which were non-cash) from restructuring the energy generation and storage segment, which comprised of disposals of certain tangible assets, the shortening of the useful life of a trade name intangible asset and a contract termination penalty. In addition, we concluded that a small portion of the IPR&D asset is not commercially feasible. Consequently, we recognized an impairment loss of $13 million. We recognized settlement and legal expenses of $30 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 for the settlement with the SEC relating to a take-private proposal for Tesla. These expenses were substantially paid by the end of 2018.


Note 23 – Subsequent Events

 

Early Conversions of Convertible Senior Notes

Between January 1, 2021 and February 5, 2021, we have received additional conversion notices on our 2022 Notes and 2024 Notes for $62 million and $623 million in aggregate principal amounts, respectively, for which we intend to settle the principal amounts in cash during the three months ended March 31, 2021.

Investments

In January 2021, we updated our investment policy to provide us with more flexibility to further diversify and maximize returns on our cash that is not required to maintain adequate operating liquidity. As part of the policy, we may invest a portion of such cash in certain specified alternative reserve assets. Thereafter, we invested an aggregate $1.50 billion in bitcoin under this policy. Moreover, we expect to begin accepting bitcoin as a form of payment for our products in the near future, subject to applicable laws and initially on a limited basis, which we may or may not liquidate upon receipt.

We will account for digital assets as indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles–Goodwill and Other. The digital assets are initially recorded at cost and are subsequently remeasured on the consolidated balance sheet at cost, net of any impairment losses incurred since acquisition. We will perform an analysis each quarter to identify impairment. If the carrying value of the digital asset exceeds the fair value based on the lowest price quoted in the active exchanges during the period, we will recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference in the consolidated statement of operations.

The cost basis of the digital assets will not be adjusted upward for any subsequent increases in their quoted prices on the active exchanges. Gains (if any) will not be recorded until realized upon sale.

 

Note 24 – Subsequent EventsQuarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

In January 2018, the performance milestoneThe following table presents selected quarterly results of operations data for the aggregate production of 300,000 vehicles under the 2012 CEO Grant was achieved, resulting in the vesting of the ninth of 10 tranches under the grant.

Subject to stockholder approval, on January 21, 2018, our Board of Directors granted a new 10-year CEO performance award with vesting contingent upon achieving certain specified market capitalizationyears ended December 31, 2020 and operational milestones. On February 8, 2018, we filed a proxy statement to seek stockholder approval of the award.

On February 6, 2018, we issued $546.1 million in aggregate principal amount of automobile lease-backed notes with interest rates ranging from 2.3% to 4.9% and maturities ranging from December 2019 to March 2021. The proceeds from the issuance, net of discounts and fees, were $543.1 million. Contemporaneously, we repaid $453.6 million of the principal outstanding under the Warehouse Agreements.

On February 14, 2018, our CEO and SolarCity’s former Chief Technology Officer exchanged their $82.5 million (collectively) in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% promissory notes due in February 2018 for 6.50% promissory notes due in August 2018 in the same amounts.(in millions, except per share amounts):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31

 

 

June 30

 

 

September 30

 

 

December 31

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

5,985

 

 

$

6,036

 

 

$

8,771

 

 

$

10,744

 

Gross profit

 

$

1,234

 

 

$

1,267

 

 

$

2,063

 

 

$

2,066

 

Net income attributable to common

   stockholders

 

$

16

 

 

$

104

 

 

$

331

 

 

$

270

 

Net income per share of common stock

   attributable to common stockholders, basic (1)

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

0.32

 

 

$

0.28

 

Net income per share of common stock

   attributable to common stockholders, diluted (1)

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

$

0.27

 

 

$

0.24

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

4,541

 

 

$

6,350

 

 

$

6,303

 

 

$

7,384

 

Gross profit

 

$

566

 

 

$

921

 

 

$

1,191

 

 

$

1,391

 

Net (loss) income attributable to common

   stockholders

 

$

(702

)

 

$

(408

)

 

$

143

 

 

$

105

 

Net (loss) income per share of common stock

   attributable to common stockholders, basic (1)

 

$

(0.82

)

 

$

(0.46

)

 

$

0.16

 

 

$

0.12

 

Net (loss) income per share of common stock

   attributable to common stockholders, diluted (1)

 

$

(0.82

)

 

$

(0.46

)

 

$

0.16

 

 

$

0.11

 

 

(1)

Prior period results have been adjusted to reflect the Stock Split. See Note 1, Overview, for details.

 


ITEMITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

NoneNone.

ITEMITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation as of December 31, 2017, under the supervision andOur management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management includingrecognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2017,2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were designed at a reasonable assurance level and were effective to provide reasonable assurance.assurance that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2020.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, as stated in their report which is included herein.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter of the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEMITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

None

None.

 


PARTPART III

ITEMITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this Item 10 of Form 10-K will be included in our 20182021 Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies for our 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The 20182021 Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

ITEMITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item 11 of Form 10-K will be included in our 20182021 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEMITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this Item 12 of Form 10-K will be included in our 20182021 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEMITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this Item 13 of Form 10-K will be included in our 20182021 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEMITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item 14 of Form 10-K will be included in our 20182021 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

ITEMITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

1.

Financial statements (see Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report)

2.

All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the required information was not applicable or was not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or the accompanying notes

3.

The exhibits listed in the following Index to Exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report

 

 


INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    3.1

  

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

3.1

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    3.2

 

Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.

 

10-K

 

001-34756

 

3.2

 

March 1, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    3.3

  

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

3.2

  

February 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.1

  

Specimen common stock certificate of the Registrant.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.2

  

Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2009, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1

  

333-164593

  

4.2

  

January 29, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.3

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2010, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

4.2A

  

May 27, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.4

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement between Registrant, Toyota Motor Corporation and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

4.2B

  

May 27, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.5

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2010, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

4.2C

  

June 15, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.6

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2010, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

November 4, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.7

  

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2011, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1/A

  

333-174466

  

4.2E

  

June 2, 2011

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.8

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2011, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

June 1, 2011

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.9

  

Sixth Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2013 among the Registrant, the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003 and certain other holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

May 20, 2013

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.10

  

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2013, between the Registrant and certain holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.2

  

May 20, 2013

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.11

  

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2015, between the Registrant and certain holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

August 19, 2015

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.12

  

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2016, between the Registrant and certain holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

May 24, 2016

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.13

 

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2017, between the Registrant and certain holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

 

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

March 17, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.14

  

Indenture, dated as of May 22, 2013, by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

May 22, 2013

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.15

  

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 22, 2013, by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.2

  

May 22, 2013

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.16

  

Form of 1.50% Convertible Senior Note Due June 1, 2018 (included in Exhibit 4.15).

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.2

  

May 22, 2013

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    3.1

  

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

3.1

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    3.2

 

Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.

 

10-K

 

001-34756

 

3.2

 

March 1, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    3.3

  

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

3.2

  

February 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.1

  

Specimen common stock certificate of the Registrant.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.2

  

Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2009, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1

  

333-164593

  

4.2

  

January 29, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.3

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2010, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

4.2A

  

May 27, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.4

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement between Registrant, Toyota Motor Corporation and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

4.2B

  

May 27, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.5

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2010, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

4.2C

  

June 15, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.6

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2010, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

November 4, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.7

  

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2011, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

S-1/A

  

333-174466

  

4.2E

  

June 2, 2011

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.8

  

Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2011, between Registrant and certain holders of the Registrant’s capital stock named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

June 1, 2011

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.9

  

Sixth Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2013 among the Registrant, the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003 and certain other holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

May 20, 2013

  

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.17

 

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 5, 2014, by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.18

 

Form of 0.25% Convertible Senior Note Due March 1, 2019 (included in Exhibit 4.17).

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.19

 

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 5, 2014, by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.4

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.20

 

Form of 1.25% Convertible Senior Note Due March 1, 2021 (included in Exhibit 4.19).

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.4

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.21

 

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 22, 2017, by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

March 22, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.22

 

Form of 2.375% Convertible Senior Note Due March 15, 2022 (included in Exhibit 4.21).

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

March 22, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.23

 

Indenture, dated as of August 18, 2017, by and among the Registrant, SolarCity, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.1

 

August 23, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.24

 

Form of 5.30% Senior Note due August 15, 2025.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

August 23, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.25

 

Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2013, by and between SolarCity and Wells Fargo Bank National Association, including the form of convertible senior notes contained therein.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.1

 

October 21, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.26

 

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2016, between SolarCity and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee to the Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2013, between SolarCity and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.1

 

November 21, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.27

 

Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2014, between SolarCity and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.1

 

October 6, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.28

 

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2016, between SolarCity and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee to the Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2014, between SolarCity and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

November 21, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.29

 

Indenture, dated as of December 7, 2015, between SolarCity and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.1

 

December 7, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.30

 

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2016, between SolarCity and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee to the Indenture, dated as of December 7, 2015, between SolarCity and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.3

 

November 21, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.31

 

Indenture, dated as of October 15, 2014, between SolarCity and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

 

S-3ASR(1)

 

333-199321

 

4.1

 

October 15, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.32

 

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 15, 2014, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2014/3-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

October 15, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.33

 

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 15, 2014, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2014/4-7

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

October 15, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.34

 

Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/3-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

January 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.35

 

Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/4-7.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

January 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.36

 

Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/5-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

March 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.10

  

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2013, between the Registrant and certain holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.2

  

May 20, 2013

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.11

  

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investor’s Rights Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2015, between the Registrant and certain holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

August 19, 2015

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.12

  

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2016, between the Registrant and certain holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

May 24, 2016

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.13

 

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2017, between the Registrant and certain holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

 

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

March 17, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.14

 

Waiver to Fifth Amended and Restated Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2019, between the Registrant and certain holders of the capital stock of the Registrant named therein.

 

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

May 3, 2019

  

 

    4.15

  

Indenture, dated as of May 22, 2013, by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

4.1

  

May 22, 2013

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.16

 

Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 5, 2014, by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.4

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.17

 

Form of 1.25% Convertible Senior Note Due March 1, 2021 (included in Exhibit 4.16).

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.4

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.18

 

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 22, 2017, by and between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

March 22, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.19

 

Form of 2.375% Convertible Senior Note Due March 15, 2022 (included in Exhibit 4.18).

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

March 22, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.20

 

Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 7, 2019, by and between Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association, related to 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes due May 15, 2024.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

May 8, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.21

 

Form of 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes due May 15, 2024 (included in Exhibit 4.20).

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

May 8, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.22

 

Indenture, dated as of August 18, 2017, by and among the Registrant, SolarCity, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.1

 

August 23, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.23

 

Form of 5.30% Senior Note due August 15, 2025.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

4.2

 

August 23, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.37

 

Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/6-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

March 9, 2015

 

 

    4.38

 

Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/7-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

March 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.39

 

Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C2-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.40

 

Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C3-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.41

 

Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C4-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.42

 

Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C5-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.43

 

Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C7-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

March 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.44

 

Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C8-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

March 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.45

 

Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C9-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

March 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

    4.24

 

Indenture, dated as of October 15, 2014, between SolarCity and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee.

 

S-3ASR(1)

 

333-199321

 

4.1

 

October 15, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.25

 

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 15, 2014, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2014/4-7.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

October 15, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.26

 

Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/4-7.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

January 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.27

 

Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/6-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

March 9, 2015

 

 

    4.28

 

Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/7-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

March 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.29

 

Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C4-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.30

 

Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 19, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C5-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

March 19, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.31

 

Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C9-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

March 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.32

 

Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C10-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

March 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.33

 

Twenty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 2, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C14-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

April 2, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.34

 

Thirtieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C19-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

April 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.35

 

Thirty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C20-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

April 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.36

 

Thirty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C24-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

April 14, 2015

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.46

 

Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C10-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

March 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.47

 

Twenty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 2, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C12-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

April 2, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.48

 

Twenty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 2, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C13-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

April 2, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.49

 

Twenty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 2, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C14-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

April 2, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.50

 

Twenty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C17-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

April 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.51

 

Twenty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C18-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

April 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.52

 

Thirtieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C19-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

April 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.53

 

Thirty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 9, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C20-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

April 9, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.54

 

Thirty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C22-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

April 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.37

 

Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C25-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

April 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.38

 

Thirty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 21, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C27-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

April 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.39

 

Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 21, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C28-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

April 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.40

 

Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 27, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C32-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

April 27, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.41

 

Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 27, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C33-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

April 27, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.42

 

Forty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/12-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

May 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.43

 

Forty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/13-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

May 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.44

 

Fifty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 11, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C36-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

May 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.45

 

Fifty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 11, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C37-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

May 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.46

 

Fifty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 18, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C40-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

May 18, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.47

 

Fifty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 18, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C41-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

May 18, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.48

 

Sixty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C44-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

May 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.49

 

Sixty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C45-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

May 26, 2015

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.55

 

Thirty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C23-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

April 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.56

 

Thirty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C24-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

April 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.57

 

Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C25-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

April 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.58

 

Thirty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 21, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C27-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

April 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.59

 

Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 21, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C28-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

April 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.60

 

Forty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 27, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C30-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

April 27, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.61

 

Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 27, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C31-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

April 27, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.62

 

Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 27, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C32-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

April 27, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.63

 

Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 27, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C33-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

April 27, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.50

 

Seventieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C52-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

June 16, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.51

 

Seventy-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C53-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

June 16, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.52

 

Seventy-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 22, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C56-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

June 23, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.53

 

Seventy-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 22, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C57-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

June 23, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.54

 

Eightieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 29, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C61-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

June 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.55

 

Eighty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 29, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C62-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

June 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.56

 

Ninetieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C71-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

July 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.57

 

Ninety-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C72-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

July 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.58

 

Ninety-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/20-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

July 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.59

 

Ninety-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/21-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

July 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.60

 

One Hundred-and-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C81-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

August 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.61

 

One Hundred-and-Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 17, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C87-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

August 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.64

 

Forty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/10-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

May 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.65

 

Forty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/11-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

May 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.66

 

Forty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/12-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

May 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.67

 

Forty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 1, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/13-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

May 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.68

 

Fiftieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 11, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C34-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

May 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.69

 

Fifty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 11, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C35-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

May 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.70

 

Fifty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 11, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C36-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

May 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.71

 

Fifty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 11, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C37-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

May 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.72

 

Fifty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.50% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/14-2.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

May 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

    4.62

 

One Hundred-and-Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 24, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C92-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

August 24, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.63

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C97-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

August 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.64

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C101-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

September 15, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.65

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C102-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

September 15, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.66

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C106-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

September 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.67

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C107-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

September 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.68

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C111-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

October 13, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.69

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/25-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.70

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/26-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.71

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C116-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

November 4, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.72

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C121-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

November 17, 2015

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.73

 

Fifty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 18, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C38-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

May 18, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.74

 

Fifty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 18, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C39-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

May 18, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.75

 

Fifty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 18, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C40-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

May 18, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.76

 

Fifty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 18, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C41-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

May 18, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.77

 

Fifty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C42-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

May 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.78

 

Sixtieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C43-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

May 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.79

 

Sixty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C44-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

May 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.80

 

Sixty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C45-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

May 26, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.81

 

Sixty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C46-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

June 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.73

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C122-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

November 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.74

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C126-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

November 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.75

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C127-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

November 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.76

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C131-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

December 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.77

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C132-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

December 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.78

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C135-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

December 28, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.79

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C136-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

December 28, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.80

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C137-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

December 28, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.81

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/3-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

January 29, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.82

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/4-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

January 29, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.82

 

Sixty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C47-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

June 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.83

 

Sixty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C48-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

June 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.84

 

Sixty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C49-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

June 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.85

 

Sixty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C50-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

June 16, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.86

 

Sixty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C51-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

June 16, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.87

 

Seventieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C52-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

June 16, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.88

 

Seventy-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C53-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

June 16, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.89

 

Seventy-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 22, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C54-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

June 23, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.90

 

Seventy-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 22, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C55-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

June 23, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

    4.83

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/5-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

January 29, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.84

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 26, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.25% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/8-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

February 26, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.85

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 21, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.25% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/10-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

March 21, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.86

 

One Hundred-and-Eighty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.25% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/12-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

June 10, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.87

 

Description of Registrant’s Securities

 

10-K

 

001-34756

 

4.119

 

February 13, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.1**

  

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its directors and officers.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

10.1

  

June 15, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.2**

  

2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

10.2

  

May 27, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.3**

  

Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

S-1

  

333-164593

  

10.3

  

January 29, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.4**

  

Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.4

 

February 23, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.5**

  

Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.6

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.6**

  

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.7

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.7**

  

Amended and Restated 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of February 1, 2017.

 

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.8

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.8**

  

2019 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

S-8

  

333-232079

  

4.2

 

June 12, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.9**

  

Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2019 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

S-8

  

333-232079

  

4.3

  

June 12, 2019

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.10**

  

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2019 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

S-8

  

333-232079

  

4.4

  

June 12, 2019

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.11**

  

Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of June 12, 2019.

  

S-8

  

333-232079

  

4.5

  

June 12, 2019

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.12**

 

2007 SolarCity Stock Plan and form of agreements used thereunder.

 

S-1(1)

 

333-184317

 

10.2

 

October 5, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.13**

 

2012 SolarCity Equity Incentive Plan and form of agreements used thereunder.

 

S-1(1)

 

333-184317

 

10.3

 

October 5, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.14**

 

2010 Zep Solar, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan and form of agreements used thereunder.

 

S-8(1)

 

333-192996

 

4.5

 

December 20, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.15**

  

Offer Letter between the Registrant and Elon Musk dated October 13, 2008.

  

S-1

  

333-164593

  

10.9

  

January 29, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.91

 

Seventy-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 22, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C56-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

June 23, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.92

 

Seventy-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 22, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C57-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

June 23, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.93

 

Seventy-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 29, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C59-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

June 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.94

 

Seventy-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 29, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C60-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

June 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.95

 

Eightieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 29, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C61-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

June 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.96

 

Eighty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 29, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C62-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

June 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.97

 

Eighty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C64-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

July 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.98

 

Eighty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C65-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

July 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.99

 

Eighty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C66-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

July 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

  10.16**

 

Performance Stock Option Agreement between the Registrant and Elon Musk dated January 21, 2018.

 

DEF 14A

 

001-34756

 

Appendix A

 

February 8, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.17**

 

Maxwell Technologies, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, as amended through May 6, 2010

 

8-K(2)

 

001-15477

 

10.1

 

May 10, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.18**

 

Maxwell Technologies, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

 

DEF 14A(2)

 

001-15477

 

Appendix A

 

June 2, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.19

 

Indemnification Agreement, effective as of June 23, 2020, between Registrant and Elon R. Musk.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.4

 

July 28, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.20

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2014, by and between the Registrant and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.21

 

Form of Call Option Confirmation relating to 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due March 1, 2021.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.3

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.22

 

Form of Warrant Confirmation relating to 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due March 1, 2021.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.5

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.23

 

Form of Call Option Confirmation relating to 2.375% Convertible Notes due March 15, 2022.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

March 22, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.24

 

Form of Warrant Confirmation relating to 2.375% Convertible Notes due March 15, 2022.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

March 22, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.25

 

Form of Call Option Confirmation relating to 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes due May 15, 2024.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

May 3, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.26

 

Form of Warrant Confirmation relating to 2.00% Convertible Senior Notes due May 15, 2024.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

May 3, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.27†

  

Supply Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 5, 2011.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.50

  

February 27, 2012

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.28†

  

Amendment No. 1 to Supply Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 29, 2013.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.35A

  

February 26, 2014

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.29

 

Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated July 31, 2014.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

November 7, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.30†

 

General Terms and Conditions between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 1, 2014.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

October 11, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.31

 

Letter Agreement, dated as of February 24, 2015, regarding addition of co-party to General Terms and Conditions, Production Pricing Agreement and Investment Letter Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant.

 

10-K

 

001-34756

 

10.25A

 

February 24, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.100

 

Eighty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C67-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

July 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.101

 

Eighty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C69-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

July 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.102

 

Eighty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C70-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

July 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.103

 

Ninetieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C71-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

July 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.104

 

Ninety-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C72-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

July 21, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.105

 

Ninety-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/18-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

July 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.106

 

Ninety-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/19-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

July 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.107

 

Ninety-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/20-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

July 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.108

 

Ninety-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/21-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

July 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

  10.32†

 

Amendment to Gigafactory General Terms, dated March 1, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Energy Corporation of North America.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

October 11, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.33††

 

Amended and Restated General Terms and Conditions for Gigafactory, entered into on June 10, 2020, by and among Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

July 28, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.34†

 

Production Pricing Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 1, 2014.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.3

 

November 7, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.35†

 

Investment Letter Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 1, 2014.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.4

 

November 7, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.36

 

Amendment to Gigafactory Documents, dated April 5, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America and Panasonic Energy Corporation of North America.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

May 10, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.37††

 

2019 Pricing Agreement (Japan Cells) with respect to 2011 Supply Agreement, executed September 20, 2019, by and among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., Panasonic Corporation and SANYO Electric Co., Ltd.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.6

 

October 29, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.38††

 

2020 Pricing Agreement (Gigafactory 2170 Cells), entered into on June 9, 2020, by and among Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.3

 

July 28, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.39††

 

2021 Pricing Agreement (Japan Cells) with respect to 2011 Supply Agreement, executed December 29, 2020, by and among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., Panasonic Corporation of North America and SANYO Electric Co., Ltd.

 

 —

  

 —

  

 —

  

 —

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.40††

 

Amended and Restated Factory Lease, executed as of March 26, 2019, by and between the Registrant and Panasonic Energy North America, a division of Panasonic Corporation of North America, as tenant.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.3

 

July 29, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.41††

 

Lease Amendment, executed September 20, 2019, by and among the Registrant, Panasonic Corporation of North America, on behalf of its division Panasonic Energy of North America, with respect to the Amended and Restated Factory Lease, executed as of March 26, 2019.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.7

 

October 29, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.42††

 

Second Lease Amendment, entered into on June 9, 2020, by and between the Registrant and Panasonic Energy of North America, a division of Panasonic Corporation of North America, with respect to the Amended and Restated Factory Lease dated January 1, 2017.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

July 28, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.109

 

Ninety-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 3, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C74-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

August 3, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.110

 

Ninety-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 3, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C75-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

August 3, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.111

 

One Hundredth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 3, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C76-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

August 3, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.112

 

One Hundred-and-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 3, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C77-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

August 3, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.113

 

One Hundred-and-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C79-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

August 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.114

 

One Hundred-and-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C80-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

August 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.115

 

One Hundred-and-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C81-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

August 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.116

 

One Hundred-and-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C82-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

August 10, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

  10.43

 

Amendment and Restatement in respect of ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2019, by and among certain of the Registrant’s and Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V.’s direct or indirect subsidiaries from time to time party thereto, as borrowers, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as documentation agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agents, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent.

 

S-4/A

3

33-229749

  

10.68

  

April 3, 2019  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.44

 

First Amendment to Amended and Restated ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2020, in respect of the Amended and Restated ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2019, by and among certain of the Registrant’s and Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V.’s direct or indirect subsidiaries from time to time party thereto, as borrowers, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as documentation agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agents, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent.

 

 —

  

 —

  

 —

  

 —

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.45†

 

 

Agreement for Tax Abatement and Incentives, dated as of May 7, 2015, by and between Tesla Motors, Inc. and the State of Nevada, acting by and through the Nevada Governor’s Office of Economic Development.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

August 7, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.46††

 

Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2020, by and among Tesla 2014 Warehouse SPV LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, the Lenders and Group Agents from time to time party thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

October 26, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.47†

 

Loan and Security Agreement, executed on December 28, 2018, by and among LML 2018 Warehouse SPV, LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, the Lenders and Group Agents from time to time party thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent.

 

10-K  

  

001-34756

  

10.55  

  

February 19, 2019  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.117

 

One Hundred-and-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 17, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C84-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

August 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.118

 

One Hundred-and-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 17, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C85-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

August 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.119

 

One Hundred-and-Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 17, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C86-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

August 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.120

 

One Hundred-and-Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 17, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C87-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

August 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.121

 

One Hundred-and-Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 24, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C89-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

August 24, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.122

 

One Hundred-and-Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 24, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C90-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

August 24, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.123

 

One Hundred-and-Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 24, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C91-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

August 24, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.124

 

One Hundred-and-Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 24, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C92-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

August 24, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

  10.48††

 

Letter of Consent, dated as of June 14, 2019, by and among LML 2018 Warehouse SPV, LLC, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, and the Group Agents party thereto, in respect of the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2017 and as amended from time to time, by and among LML Warehouse SPV, LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, and the Lenders, Group Agents and Administrative Agent from time to time party thereto.

 

10-Q  

  

001-34756

  

10.1  

  

July 29, 2019  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.49††

 

Amendment No. 1 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2019, by and among LML 2018 Warehouse SPV, LLC, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders and Group Agents from time to time party thereto.

 

10-Q  

  

001-34756

  

10.2  

  

October 29, 2019  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.50

 

Amendment No. 2 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2019, by and among LML 2018 Warehouse SPV, LLC, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders and Group Agents from time to time party thereto.

 

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.69 

  

February 13, 2020

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.51

 

Letter of Consent, dated February 18, 2020, by and among LML 2018 Warehouse SPV, LLC, Tesla 2014 Warehouse SPV LLC, LLC and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent and as Group Agent under the 2018 Loan Agreement and the 2014 Loan Agreement, and the Group Agents party thereto, in respect of (i) the Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 27, 2018 and as amended from time to time, among LML 2018 Warehouse SPV, LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americans, as Paying Agent, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, the lenders parties and agent parties thereto, and (ii) the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 17, 2017 and as amended from time to time, among Tesla 2014 Warehouse SPV LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, the lenders and group agents party thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

April 30, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.125

 

One Hundred-and-Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C94-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

August 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.126

 

One Hundred-and-Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C95-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

August 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.127

 

One Hundred-and-Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C96-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

August 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.128

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C97-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

August 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.129

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 11, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s Solar Bonds, Series 2015/R1.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

September 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.130

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 11, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s Solar Bonds, Series 2015/R2.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

September 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.131

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 11, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s Solar Bonds, Series 2015/R3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

September 11, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.132

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C99-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

September 15, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

  10.52††

 

Letter of Consent, dated as of August 14, 2020, by and among LML 2018 Warehouse SPV, LLC, Tesla 2014 Warehouse SPV LLC, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent and Group Agent, and the Group Agents party thereto, in respect of (i) the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2018 and as amended from time to time, by and among LML 2018 Warehouse SPV, LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, and the Lenders, Group Agents, Paying Agent and Administrative Agent from time to time party thereto, and (ii) the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2017 and as amended from time to time, by and among LML Warehouse SPV, LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, and the Lenders, Group Agents and Administrative Agent from time to time party thereto.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

October 26, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.53

 

Payoff and Termination Letter, executed on August 28, 2020, by and among LML 2018 Warehouse SPV, LLC, the Lenders and Group Agents from time to time party thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Paying Agent and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, relating to Loan and Security Agreement.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.3

 

October 26, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.54

 

Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2017, by and among the Registrant, SolarCity and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC as representatives of the several initial purchasers named therein.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

August 23, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.55

 

Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of September 2, 2014, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, Inc.

 

10-Q(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16

 

November 6, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.56

 

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of October 31, 2014, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, Inc.

 

10-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16a

 

February 24, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.133

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C100-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

September 15, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.134

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C101-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

September 15, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.135

 

One Hundred-and-Twenty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C102-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

September 15, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.136

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C104-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

September 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.137

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C105-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

September 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.138

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C106-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

September 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.139

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C107-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

September 29, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.140

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C109-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

October 13, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.141

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C110-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

October 13, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.142

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C111-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

October 13, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.143

 

One Hundred-and-Thirty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 13, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C112-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

October 13, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.144

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/23-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.145

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/24-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.146

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/25-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.147

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/26-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.148

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C114-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

November 4, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.149

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C115-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

November 4, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.150

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C116-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

November 4, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.151

 

One Hundred-and-Forty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C117-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

November 4, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.152

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C119-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

November 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.153

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C120-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

November 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.154

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C121-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

November 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.155

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C122-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

November 17, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.156

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C124-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

November 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.157

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C125-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

November 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.158

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C126-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

November 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.159

 

One Hundred-and-Fifty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C127-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

November 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.160

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C129-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

December 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.161

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C130-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

December 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.162

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C131-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

December 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.163

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 14, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C132-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

December 14, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.164

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 2.65% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C134-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

December 28, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.165

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.60% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C135-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

December 28, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.166

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.70% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C136-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

December 28, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.167

 

One Hundred-and-Sixty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 28, 2015, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.45% Solar Bonds, Series 2015/C137-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

December 28, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.168

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 3.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/2-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

January 29, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.169

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/3-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

January 29, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.170

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.00% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/4-10.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.5

 

January 29, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.171

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.75% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/5-15.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.6

 

January 29, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.172

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 26, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.50% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/7-3.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

February 26, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.173

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 26, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.25% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/8-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.4

 

February 26, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.174

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 21, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.40% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/9-1.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

March 21, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.175

 

One Hundred-and-Seventy-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 21, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.25% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/10-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

March 21, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.176

 

One Hundred-and-Eightieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 4.40% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/11-1.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

June 10, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.177

 

One Hundred-and-Eighty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 5.25% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/12-5.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.3

 

June 10, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    4.178

 

One Hundred-and-Eighty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 17, 2016, by and between SolarCity and the Trustee, related to SolarCity’s 6.50% Solar Bonds, Series 2016/13-18M.

 

8-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

4.2

 

August 17, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.1**

  

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its directors and officers.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

10.1

  

June 15, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.2**

  

2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

S-1/A

  

333-164593

  

10.2

  

May 27, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.3**

  

Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

S-1

  

333-164593

  

10.3

  

January 29, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.4**

  

Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.5**

  

Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.6

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.6**

  

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.7

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.7**

  

Amended and Restated 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective as of February 1, 2017.

 

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.8

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.8**

 

2007 SolarCity Stock Plan and form of agreements used thereunder.

 

S-1(1)

 

333-184317

 

10.2

 

October 5, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.9**

 

2012 SolarCity Equity Incentive Plan and form of agreements used thereunder.

 

S-1(1)

 

333-184317

 

10.3

 

October 5, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.10**

 

2010 Zep Solar, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan and form of agreements used thereunder.

 

S-8(1)

 

333-192996

 

4.5

 

December 20, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.11**

  

Offer Letter between the Registrant and Elon Musk dated October 13, 2008.

  

S-1

  

333-164593

  

10.9

  

January 29, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.12**

 

Performance Stock Option Agreement between the Registrant and Elon Musk dated January 21, 2018.

 

DEF 14A

 

001-34756

 

Appendix A

 

February 8, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.13**

  

Offer Letter between the Registrant and Jeffrey B. Straubel dated May 6, 2004.

  

S-1

  

333-164593

  

10.12

  

January 29, 2010

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.14**

  

Offer Letter between the Registrant and Deepak Ahuja dated February 21, 2017.

  

10-Q

  

001-34756

  

10.7

  

May 10, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.15**

 

Incentive Compensation Plan for July 1, 2017–December 31, 2017, for Jon McNeill.

 

10-Q

  

001-34756

  

10.7

  

November 3, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.16

  

Form of Call Option Confirmation relating to 1.50% Convertible Senior Note Due June 1, 2018.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

10.1

  

May 22, 2013

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.17

  

Form of Warrant Confirmation relating to 1.50% Convertible Senior Note Due June 1, 2018.

  

8-K

  

001-34756

  

10.2

  

May 22, 2013

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.18

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2014, by and between the Registrant and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.19

 

Form of Call Option Confirmation relating to 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due March 1, 2019.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.20

 

Form of Call Option Confirmation relating to 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due March 1, 2021.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.3

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.21

 

Form of Warrant Confirmation relating to 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due March 1, 2019.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.4

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.22

 

Form of Warrant Confirmation relating to 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due March 1, 2021.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.5

 

March 5, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.23

 

Form of Call Option Confirmation relating to 2.375% Convertible Notes due March 15, 2022.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

March 22, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.24

 

Form of Warrant Confirmation relating to 2.375% Convertible Notes due March 15, 2022.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

March 22, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.25†

  

Supply Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 5, 2011.

  

10-K

  

-001-34756

  

10.50

  

February 27, 2012

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.26†

  

Amendment No. 1 to Supply Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 29, 2013.

  

10-K

  

001-34756

  

10.35A

  

February 26, 2014

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.27

 

Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated July 31, 2014.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

November 7, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.28†

 

General Terms and Conditions between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 1, 2014.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

October 11, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.29

 

Letter Agreement, dated as of February 24, 2015, regarding addition of co-party to General Terms and Conditions, Production Pricing Agreement and Investment Letter Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant.

 

10-K

 

001-34756

 

10.25A

 

February 24, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.30†

 

Amendment to Gigafactory General Terms, dated March 1, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Energy Corporation of North America.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

October 11, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.31†

 

Production Pricing Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 1, 2014.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.3

 

November 7, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.32†

 

Investment Letter Agreement between Panasonic Corporation and the Registrant dated October 1, 2014.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.4

 

November 7, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.33

 

Amendment to Gigafactory Documents, dated April 5, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America and Panasonic Energy Corporation of North America.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

May 10, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.34

 

ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2015, by and among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., certain of the Registrant’s and Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V.’s direct or indirect subsidiaries from time to time party thereto, as borrowers, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as documentation agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agents, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

June 12, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.35

 

First Amendment, dated as of November 3, 2015, to ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2015, by and among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., certain of the Registrant’s and Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V.’s direct or indirect subsidiaries from time to time party thereto, as borrowers, and the documentation agent, syndication agents, administrative agent, collateral agent and lenders from time to time party thereto.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

November 5, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.36

 

Second Amendment, dated as of December 31, 2015, to ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2015, by and among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., certain of the Registrant’s and Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V.’s direct or indirect subsidiaries from time to time party thereto, as borrowers, and the documentation agent, syndication agents, administrative agent, collateral agent and lenders from time to time party thereto.

 

10-K

 

001-34756

 

10.28B

 

February 24, 2016

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.37

 

Third Amendment, dated as of February 9, 2016, to ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2015, by and among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., certain of the Registrant’s and Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V.’s direct or indirect subsidiaries from time to time party thereto, as borrowers, and the documentation agent, syndication agents, administrative agent, collateral agent and lenders from time to time party thereto.

 

10-K

 

001-34756

 

10.28C

 

February 24, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.38

 

Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., the lenders party thereto and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

August 1, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.39

 

Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2016, among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., the lenders party thereto and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

December 20, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.40

 

Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2017, among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., the lenders party thereto and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

August 4, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.41

 

Seventh Amendment to the ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2017, by and among the Registrant, Tesla Motors Netherlands B.V., Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the other agents party thereto.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.2

 

August 23, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.42†

 

Agreement for Tax Abatement and Incentives, dated as of May 7, 2015, by and between Tesla Motors, Inc. and the State of Nevada, acting by and through the Nevada Governor’s Office of Economic Development.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

August 7, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.43†

 

Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2017, by and among Tesla 2014 Warehouse SPV LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, the Lenders and Group Agents from time to time party thereto, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.3

 

November 3, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.44†

 

Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2017, by and among Tesla 2014 Warehouse SPV LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, the Lenders and Group Agents from time to time party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Paying Agent.

 

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.45†

 

Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2017, by and among LML Warehouse SPV, LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, the Lenders and Group Agents from time to time party thereto, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.4

 

November 3, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.46†

 

Amendment No. 1 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2017, by and among LML Warehouse SPV, LLC, Tesla Finance LLC, the Lenders and Group Agents from time to time party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Paying Agent.

 

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.47

 

Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2017, by and among the Registrant, SolarCity and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC as representatives of the several initial purchasers named therein.

 

8-K

 

001-34756

 

10.1

 

August 23, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.48

 

Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of September 2, 2014, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, Inc.

 

10-Q(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16

 

November 6, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.49

 

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of October 31, 2014, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, Inc.

 

10-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16a

 

February 24, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.50

 

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of December 15, 2014, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, Inc.

 

10-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16b

 

February 24, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.51

 

Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of February 12, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, Inc.

 

10-Q(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16c

 

May 6, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

  10.57

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of December 15, 2014, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, Inc.

10-K(1)

001-35758

10.16b

February 24, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.52  10.58

 

Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of February 12, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, Inc.

10-Q(1)

001-35758

10.16c

May 6, 2015

  10.59

Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of March 30, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, Inc.

 

10-Q(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16d

 

May 6, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.5310.60

 

Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of June 30, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, LLC.

 

10-Q(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16e

 

July 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.5410.61

 

Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of September 1, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, LLC.

 

10-Q(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16f

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.5510.62

 

Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of October 9, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, LLC.

 

10-Q(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16g

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.56

 

Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of October 26, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, LLC.

 

10-Q(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16h

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.57

 

Ninth Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of December 9, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, LLC.

 

10-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16i

 

February 10, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.58

 

Tenth Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of March 31, 2017, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the Colleges of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, LLC.

 

10-Q

  

001-34756

  

10.8

  

May 10, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  12.1

  

Statement regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

  

— 

  

— 

  

— 

  

— 

  

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  21.1

 

List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  23.1

  

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  23.2

  

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  31.1

  

Rule 13a-14(a) / 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  31.2

  

Rule 13a-14(a) / 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

  10.63

 

Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of October 26, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, LLC.

 

10-Q(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16h

 

October 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.64

 

Ninth Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of December 9, 2015, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, LLC.

 

10-K(1)

 

001-35758

 

10.16i

 

February 10, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.65

 

Tenth Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement For Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of March 31, 2017, by and between The Research Foundation For The State University of New York, on behalf of the Colleges of Nanoscale Science and Engineering of the State University of New York, and Silevo, LLC.

 

10-Q

  

001-34756

  

10.8

  

May 10, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.66

 

Eleventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement for Research & Development Alliance on Triex Module Technology, effective as of July 22, 2020, among the Research Foundation for the State University of New York, Silevo, LLC and Tesla Energy Operations, Inc.

 

10-Q

 

001-34756

 

10.6

 

July 28, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.67††

 

Grant Contract for State-Owned Construction Land Use Right, dated as of October 17, 2018, by and between Shanghai Planning and Land Resource Administration Bureau, as grantor, and Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., as grantee (English translation).

 

10-Q

  

001-34756

  

10.2

  

July 29, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.68††

 

Facility Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2019, by and between China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. Beijing Branch and Tesla Automobile (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (English translation).

 

10-Q

  

001-34756

  

10.3

  

October 29, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  10.69††

 

Statement Letter to China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. Beijing Branch from Tesla Automobile (Beijing) Co., Ltd., dated as of September 26, 2019 (English translation).

 

10-Q

  

001-34756

  

10.4

  

October 29, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File No.

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  32.1*

  

Section 1350 Certifications

  

  

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 99.1

 

Certain Excerpts from Annual Report on Form 10-K of SolarCity

 

10-K

  

001-34756

  

99.1

  

March 1, 2017

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.INS

  

XBRL Instance Document

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.SCH

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.CAL

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.DEF

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.LAB

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.PRE

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Exhibit

Incorporated by Reference

Filed

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing Date

Herewith

  10.70††

Fixed Asset Syndication Loan Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2019, by and among Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., China Construction Bank Corporation, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Special Area Branch, Agricultural Bank of China Shanghai Changning Sub-branch, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Co., Ltd., Shanghai Branch, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Special Area Branch (English translation).

10-K

001-34756  

10.85  

February 13, 2020

  10.71††

Fixed Asset Syndication Loan Agreement and Supplemental Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2019, by and among Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., China Construction Bank Corporation, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Special Area Branch, Agricultural Bank of China Shanghai Changning Sub-branch, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Co., Ltd., Shanghai Branch, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Special Area Branch (English translation).

10-K

001-34756  

10.86  

February 13, 2020  

  10.72††

Syndication Revolving Loan Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2019, by and among Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. China Construction Bank Corporation, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Special Area Branch, Agricultural Bank of China Shanghai Changning Sub-branch, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Co., Ltd., Shanghai Branch, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Special Area Branch (English translation).

10-K  

001-34756  

10.87  

February 13, 2020  

  10.73††

Working Capital Loan Contact, dated as of May 7, 2020, between Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone Lingang Special Area Branch and Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

10-Q

001-34756  

10.5

July 28, 2020

  21.1

List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant

X

  23.1

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

—  

—  

—  

—  

X

  31.1

Rule 13a-14(a) / 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer

—  

—  

—  

—  

X

  31.2

Rule 13a-14(a) / 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

—  

—  

—  

—  

X

  32.1*

Section 1350 Certifications

X

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document

X

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

X


Exhibit

Incorporated by Reference

Filed

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing Date

Herewith

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

Linkbase Document.

X

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

X

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

X

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

X

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101)

 

*

Furnished herewith

**

Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit

††

Portions of this exhibit have been redacted in compliance with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(10).

(1)

Indicates a filing of SolarCity

ITEM 16.(2)

Indicates a filing of Maxwell Technologies, Inc.

ITEM 16.

SUMMARY

None

 

 


SIGNATURESSIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

Tesla, Inc.

 

 

 

Date: February 22, 20188, 2021

 

/s/ Elon Musk

 

 

Elon Musk

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Elon Musk

  

Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

 

February 22, 20188, 2021

    Elon Musk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Deepak AhujaZachary J. Kirkhorn

  

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

 

February 22, 20188, 2021

    Deepak AhujaZachary J. Kirkhorn

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Eric BranderizVaibhav Taneja

  

Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

 

February 22, 20188, 2021

    Eric Branderiz

/s/ Brad W. Buss

Director

February 22, 2018

    Brad W. BussVaibhav Taneja

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Robyn Denholm

  

Director

 

February 22, 20188, 2021

    Robyn Denholm

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Ira Ehrenpreis

  

Director

 

February 22, 20188, 2021

    Ira Ehrenpreis

/s/ Lawrence J. Ellison

Director

February 8, 2021

    Lawrence J. Ellison

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Antonio J. Gracias

  

Director

 

February 22, 20188, 2021

    Antonio J. Gracias

/s/ Hiromichi Mizuno

Director

February 8, 2021

    Hiromichi Mizuno

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ James Murdoch

  

Director

 

February 22, 20188, 2021

    James Murdoch

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Kimbal Musk

  

Director

 

February 22, 20188, 2021

    Kimbal Musk

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Linda Johnson RiceKathleen Wilson-Thompson

  

Director

 

February 22, 20188, 2021

    Linda Johnson RiceKathleen Wilson-Thompson

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director

    Stephen T. Jurvetson

 

126

152