accacr

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31 2017, 2023

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 001-34735

RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWAREdelaware

26-1251524

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

227 W. Monroe St.,27th Floor

Chicago, Illinois60606

(Address of principal executive offices)

(312) (312) 292-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, - $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized

RYI

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K(§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of a share of the registrant’s common stock on June 30, 20172023 as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date was approximately $155,628,802.$1,097,450,065. Shares of the registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer, director, and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This calculation does not reflect a determination that certain persons are affiliates of the registrant for any other purpose.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of February 28, 201819, 2024 there were 37,208,58134,018,705 shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information required to be furnished pursuant to Part III of this Form 10-K will be set forth in, and incorporated by reference from, the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders (the “2017“2023 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2023.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

3

PART I

Item 1.

Business

4

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

1112

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

2122

Item 2.1C.

PropertiesCybersecurity

2223

Item 3.2.

Legal ProceedingsProperties

24

Item 4.3.

Mine Safety DisclosuresLegal Proceedings

2426

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

26

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

2527

Item 6.

Selected Financial DataReserved

2729

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2930

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

4645

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4846

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

9489

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

9489

Item 9B.

Other Information

9489

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

9590

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

9590

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

9590

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

9691

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

9691

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

9792

Signatures

10196

2



SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKINGFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains “forward-looking statements.” Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “objectives,” “goals,” “preliminary,” “range,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “estimates,” “will,” “should,” “plans” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and may involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may vary materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Among the factors that significantly impact the metals distribution industry and our business are:

highly cyclical fluctuations resulting from, among others, seasonality, market uncertainty, and costs of goods sold;

remaining competitive and maintaining market share in the highly competitive and fragmented metals distribution industry;

managing the costs of purchased metals relative to the price at which we sell our products during periods of rapid price escalation;

escalation or deflation;

our substantial indebtednessthe management of inventory and the covenants in instruments governing such indebtedness;

other costs and expenses;

customer, supplier, and competitor consolidation, bankruptcy, or insolvency;

the impairment of goodwill that could result from, among other things, volatility in the markets in which we operate;

the impact of geopolitical events;

future funding for postretirement employee benefits may require substantial payments from current cash flow;
the failure to effectively integrate newly acquired operations;

the regulatory and other operational risks associated with our operations located outside of the United States (or “U.S.(“U.S.”);

the ability of management of inventoryto focus on North American and other costs and expenses;

foreign operations;

currency fluctuations in the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollar, the Chinese renminbi, the Mexican peso, and the Hong Kong dollar;

the adequacy of our efforts to mitigate cyber security risks and threats;

reduced production schedules, layoffs or work stoppages by our own, our suppliers’, or customers’ personnel;

certain employee retirement benefit plans are underfunded and the actual costs could exceed current estimates;

future funding for postretirement employee benefits may require substantial payments from current cash flow;

prolonged disruption of our processing centers;

the ability to retain and attract management and key personnel;

the ability ofour risk management to focus on North American and foreign operations;

strategies may result in losses;

the ability to comply with the terms of our asset-based credit facility and our indenture;

the incurrence of substantial costs or liabilities to comply with, or as a result of violations of, environmental laws;

the impact of new or pending litigation against us;

the risk of product liability claims;

our risk management strategies may result in losses;

currency fluctuations in the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollarindebtedness and the Chinese renminbi;

covenants in instruments governing such indebtedness;

customer, supplier, and competitor consolidation, bankruptcy or insolvency;

the ownership of a majorityability to comply with the terms of our equity securities byasset-based credit facility; and

the influence of a single investor group.

group over our policies and procedures.

These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should, therefore, be considered in light of various factors, including those set forth in this Annual Report under “Risk Factors” and the caption “Industry and Operating Trends” included in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Moreover, we caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they were made. We do not undertake any obligation to revise or publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.


3


PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Ryerson Holding Corporation (“Ryerson Holding”), a Delaware corporation, is the parent company of Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (“JT Ryerson”), a Delaware corporation. Affiliates of Platinum Equity, LLC (“Platinum”) own approximately 21,037,5003,924,478 shares of our common stock, which is approximately 57%11.5% of our issued and outstanding common stock.

We are a leading value-added processor and distributor of industrial metals with operations in the United States ("U.S.") through JT Ryerson and other U.S. subsidiaries, in Canada through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Ryerson Canada”), and in Mexico through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Metals de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (“Ryerson Mexico”). In addition to our North American operations, we conduct materialsmetal processing and distribution operations in China through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Ryerson China Limited, a Chinese limited liability company (“Ryerson China”). Unless the context indicates otherwise, Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, Ryerson Canada, Ryerson China,Mexico, and Ryerson MexicoChina together with their subsidiaries, are collectively referred to herein as “Ryerson,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company.”

Our Company

We believe we are one of the largest value-add processors and distributors of industrial metals in North America measured in terms of sales. We have approximately 4,600 employees across 110 facilities in North America and four facilities in China. Through this network we serve approximately 40,000 customers across a wide range of manufacturing end-markets. Our industry is highly fragmented with the largest companies accounting for only a small percentage of total market share. Our customer base rangescustomers range from local, independently owned fabricators and machine shops to large, international original equipment manufacturers. We carry a full line of over 65,000approximately 75,000 products in stainless steel, aluminum, carbon steel, and alloy steels and a limited line of nickel and red metals in various shapes and forms. More than 75%In addition to our metals products, we offer numerous value-added processing and fabrication services, and nearly 80% of the products we sell are processed to meet customer requirements. Specifically, we provide a wide range of flat and long metals products, we offer numerous value-added processing and fabrication services such as bending, beveling, blanking, blasting, burning, cutting-to-length, drilling, embossing, flattening, forming, grinding, laser cutting, machining, notching, painting, perforating, punching, rolling, sawing, scribing, shearing, slitting, stamping, tapping, threading, welding, or other techniques to process materials to a specified thickness, length, width, shape, and surface quality pursuant to specific customer orders. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we purchased 2.0 million tons of materials from suppliers throughout the world.

Our value proposition alsobusiness strategy includes providing a superior level of customer service and responsiveness, technical services, and inventory management solutions.solutions while maintaining low operating costs in order to maximize financial results. Our range of products together withgrowth strategy is based on increasing our breadth ofoperating results through organic growth activities and strategic acquisitions.

To that end, we continue to focus on our interconnected network, systems, and enhancing our value-added services allows usand online presence to create long-term partnerships withprovide increased access, functionality, and flexibility to our customerscustomers. We are using advanced analytics to improve pricing and enhances our profitability.

We track the processing, if any, performed on sold material for over 95% of our total revenues. The activities we track broadly fall into four main processing categories: (1) sheet processing (excludes fabrication activities), (2) as-is long and plate, (3) cut long and plate, and (4) fabrication.  A key metric that we track is the percentage mix of revenue that comes from our fabrication capabilities. In 2010, the mix of revenue from fabrication activities was 6.7% of our sales, while in 2017, our mix of revenue from fabrication activities rose to 9.8% of our sales largely due to the strategic investments we have made in value-added processing capital expenditures.

We operate over 90 facilities across North America and five facilities in China.inventory utilization. Our service centers are strategically located near our customers, which allowspermits us to quickly process and deliver our products and services, often within the next day ofafter receiving an order. We own, lease, or contract a fleet of tractors and trailers, allowing us to efficiently meet our customers’ delivery demands. In addition, our scale enables us to maintain low operating costs. Our operating expenses as a percentage of sales for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were 14.0% and 15.3%, respectively.

We serve approximately 40,000 customers across a wide range of manufacturing end markets. Our geographic network and broad range of products andtogether with our breadth of services allowallows us to serve large, international manufacturing companies across multiple locations. service a diverse customer base and to create long-term partnerships with our customers and enhances our profitability.

We believefocus on strategic acquisitions that complement and enhance our product, customer, and geographic diversification. Ryerson’s M&A strategy includes both transformative turnaround acquisitions and value-add, bolt-on acquisitions. Recently, Ryerson has focused on bolt-on acquisitions. In 2023, Ryerson's acquisitions included BLP Holdings, LLC, Norlen Incorporated, TSA Processing, and Hudson Tool Steel Corporation. Please refer to the diverse end markets we serve reduce the volatilitySection titled “Acquisitions” of our businessItem 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations,” and Note 2 — “Acquisitions” of Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for further information regarding all acquisitions made in the aggregate.2023.

Industry Overview

Metals service centers serve as key intermediaries between metal producers and end users of metal products. They purchase in scale and sell in smaller quantities. End-users often look for “one-stop” suppliers that offer lower order volumes, shorter lead times, more reliable delivery, and processing services. Metal producers offer commodity products and typicallymainly sell metals in the form of standard-sized coils, sheets, plates, structurals, bars, and tubes. Producers, mostly steel and aluminum mills, prefertubes in large order quantities, with longer lead times, and limited inventory to maximize capacity utilization across their typically higher capital-intensive structure.

End users of metal products seek to purchase metals with customized specifications, including value-added processing. End-users in highly diverse industries such as machinery, construction, and transportation often look for “one-stop” suppliers that can offer processing services along with lower order volumes, shorter lead times, and more reliable delivery.


As an intermediary, metalsinventory. Metal service centers aggregateserve as key intermediaries closing the gap between metal producers’ supply and end-users’ demand.

By aggregating end-users’ demand purchaseand purchasing metal in bulk to take advantage of economies of scale, and thenmetals service centers may purchase, process, and deliver metal to end‑users in a more efficient and cost‑effective manner than the end‑user may achieve by dealing directly with the primary producer. Further, specialized metals processing equipment is costly and requires high‑volume production to be cost effective, and many customers are not able or willing to invest in the necessary technology, equipment, and warehousing of inventory to efficiently and effectively perform metal processing for their own operations. Due to this, many customers have reduced their in-house processing capabilities, opting to source processed metal from service centers like us. This

4


saves our customers time, labor, and expense, reducing their overall manufacturing costs, while permitting us to increasingly focus on value-added services and expanding our mix of fabrication products, which typically sell metal that meets specific customer requirements.at higher margins. This supports our capital expenditures on processing equipment to grow annual gross profit margin.

The metals service centerOur industry is comprisedhighly fragmented with the largest companies accounting for only a small percentage of many companies, thetotal market share. The majority of whichmetals services companies have limited product lines and inventories, with customers located in a specific geographic area. In general, competition is based on quality, service, price, and geographic proximity. We primarily compete with other metals service centers and to a lesser extent with metal producers.

The metals service center industry typically experiences cash flow trends that are counter-cyclical to the revenue and volume growth of the industry. Companies in the industry primarily have working capital assets. During an industry downturn, companies generally reduce working capital assets and generate cash as inventory and accounts receivable balances decline. Asdecline, and as a result, operating cash flow and liquidity tend to increase during a downturn, which typically facilitates industry participants’ ability to cover fixed costs and repay outstanding debt.downturn.

We compete with many other metals service centers and to a lesser extent with primary metal producers. Primary metal producers typically sell to larger customers that require regular shipments of higher volumes of steel than the traditional service center customer.

Competitive Strengths

Leading Market Position in North America.

We believeBased on sales, we are one of the largest service center companies for carbon, and stainless steel, as well asand aluminum based on sales in the North American market where we have a broad geographic presence with over 90110 facilities.

Our service centers are located near our customer locations, enabling us to provide timely deliverydeliver to customers across numerous geographic markets. Additionally, our widespread network of locations in the United States,U.S., Canada, and Mexico helps us to utilize our expertise to more efficiently serve customers with complex supply chain requirements across multiple manufacturing locations. We believe this is a key differentiator for customers who need a supplier that can reliably and consistently support them. Our ability to transfer inventory among our facilities better enables us to more timely and profitably source and process specialized items at regional locations throughout our network than if we were required to maintain inventory of all products and specialized equipment at each location.

We believe with our significant footprint in the North American market, combined with our significant scale and operating leverage, a cyclical recovery of the service center industry supported by long-term growth trends in our end markets should allow us to experience higher growth rates relative to North American economic improvement. However, there can be no guarantee that we will experience such higher growth rates.

Broad Geographic Reach Across Attractive End Markets.

Our operations serve a diverse range of industries including commercial ground transportation, manufacturing, metal fabrication and machine shops, industrial machinery and equipment manufacturing, consumer durable equipment, HVAC manufacturing, construction equipment manufacturing, food processing and agricultural equipment manufacturing, and oil and gas. We believe thesethis broad range of industries will provide demand forin which we sell our products and services as the North American manufacturing economy continuesreduces our risk related to grow. In addition, we expect to benefit from continued growtha downturn in international markets that will help spur demand at domestic manufacturing facilities that sell into the global market.a specific industry. We believe that our ability to quickly adjust our offeringofferings based on regional and industry specific trends creates stability while also providing the opportunity to access specific growth markets. We are focused on expanding our presence within growing, secular markets, including electric vehicles and renewable energy.

Established Platform for Organic and Acquisition Growth.

Although there can be no guarantee ofOur growth we believe a number ofstrategy is based on increasing our operating results through organic growth activities and strategic acquisitions that enhance our service, product, customer, and geographic diversification. Our strategies such asinclude investing in value-added processing capabilities, analytically targeting attractive customers and end markets with our supply chain optimization service model, expanding our large network of service centers bothindustry consolidation through capital expenditurestargeted M&A, and acquisitions,providing customers faster and pricing our products and services based on the valueeasier solutions to their metal needs, which we deliver to our customersbelieve will provide us with growth opportunities.

Given the highly fragmented nature of the metals service center industry, we believe there are numerous additional opportunities to acquire businesses and incorporate them into our existing infrastructure. GivenWhen integrating acquired businesses into our operational model, we may draw on our large scale and geographic reach we believe we can add value to these businesses in a number of ways, including providingimprove operational and financial performance through greater purchasing power, improvingimproved expense and working capital management, increased access to additional end markets, and broadening product mix.


Lean Operating Structure Providing Operating Leverage.

From significant historical changes to our footprint and decentralized operational management through tactical productivity and spending improvements, Ryerson has demonstrated the ability to effectively manage expenses.  In an improving metals service center environment characterized by increases in demand and/or pricing, we believe that most additional expenses to service higher revenue and margins would come from variable expenses while further leveraging economies of scale on our existing fixed expenses. We effectively managed our costs in 2017 with increased volume and cost inflation, as expenses as a percentage of sales declined from 15.3% in 2016 to 14.0% in 2017.  

We have also focused on process improvements in inventory management. Average inventory days excluding LIFO decreased from 76 days in 2016 to 71 days in 2017.  This reduction has decreased our exposure to metals price movements as well as increased capacity in our facilities to devote to higher margin products and capabilities. These organizational and operating changes have improved our operating structure, working capital management, and efficiency.

As a result of our initiatives, we have increased our financial flexibility and believe we have a favorable cost structure compared to many of our peers. This achievement will provide significant operating leverage if revenue improves.

Extensive Breadth of Products and Services for Diverse Customer Base.

We believe our broad product mix and marketing approach provides customers with a “one-stop shop” solution few other metals service center companies are able to offer. We provide a broad range of processing and fabrication services to meet the needs of our approximately 40,000 customers and typically fulfill more thanapproximately 1,000,000 orders per year. We also provide supply chain solutions, including just-in-time delivery and value-added processing, to many original equipment manufacturing customers.

5


For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, no single customer, including their subcontractors, accounted for more than 2%8% of our sales, and our top 10 customers, including their subcontractors accounted for less than 12%16% of our sales.

Strong Relationships with Suppliers.

We are among the largest purchasers of metals in North America and have long-term relationships with many of our North American suppliers. We believe we are frequently one of the largest customers of our suppliers and that concentrating our orders among a core group of suppliers is effective for obtaining favorable pricing and service. We believe we have the opportunity to further leverage this strength through continued focus on price and volume using an analytics-driven approach to procurement. In addition, we view our strategic suppliers as supply chain partners. Our coordinated effort focusedWe focus on logistics, lead times, rolling schedules, and scrap return programs ultimately results into drive value-based buying that is advantageous for us. Metals producers worldwide are consolidating, and large, geographically diversified customers, such as Ryerson, are desirable partners for these larger suppliers. Our relationships with suppliers often provide us with access to metals when supply is constrained. Through our knowledge of the global metals marketplace and capabilities of specific mills, we believe we have developed aan advantageous global purchasing strategy that allows us to secure favorable prices across our product lines.strategy.

Experienced Management Team with Deep Industry Knowledge.

Our senior management team has extensive industry and operational experience and has been instrumental in optimizing and implementing our strategy over the last five years.strategy. Our senior management has an average of more than 2030 years of experience in the metals or service center industries. Our CEO,Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President, Mr. Edward Lehner, who joined the Company in August 2012 as CFOChief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and became CEO in June 2015, has nearly 3032 years of experience, predominantly in the metals industry. Mr. Erich Schnaufer, who joinedMike Burbach, our Chief Operating Officer, has over 40 years of experience with the Company in 2005 and becamepreviously served as the President of the North-West Region of the Company. Mr. Jim Claussen, Executive Vice President & CFO, in January 2016, has over 2529 years of financial and accounting experience and over 10 years with Ryerson. Under their leadership, we have increased our focus on positioning the Company for growth and enhanced profitability.industry experience.

Industry Outlook

We believe that the United States economy has grown since the recession that began in 2008. According to theThe Institute for Supply Management, theManagement’s Purchasing Managers’ Index (“PMI”) was above 50%reported contracting factory activity throughout 2023 with readings consistently below the growth threshold of 50. The contractionary trend indicated by PMI began with readings dropping below 50 starting in November 2022 and continuing through December of 2023, marking 14 consecutive months, with the most recent reading of 47.4 for 30 of the last 36 months, which indicates that the U.S. manufacturing economy was generally expanding over the last three years.December 2023. The PMI measures the economic health of the manufacturing sector and is a composite index based on five indicators: new orders, inventory levels, production, supplier deliveries, and the employment environment. PMI readings can be a good indicator of industrial activity and general economic growth. Manufacturing companies experienced a stronger demand environment

The Department of Commerce announced that real GDP increased 2.5 percent in 2017 with industrial production, as measured by2023 and the U.S.


Federal Reserve showing monthly year-over-year expansionBank of Philadelphia projected that the median growth rate in dollars spent from December 2016 through December 2017 after 20 straight months of decline prior to November 2016.

Additionally, the overall U.S. economy is projected to continue growing as evidenced by the Federal Reserve’s midrange forecasted real GDP growth rates of 2.5%, 2.1%,would be 1.7 percent, 1.8 percent, and 2.0%2.1 percent for 2018, 2019,2024, 2025, and 2020,2026, respectively.

Steel demand in North America is largely dependent on growth of the automotive, industrial equipment, consumer appliance, and construction end markets. One of our keyOur end markets isreflect the industrial equipment sector,performance of the manufacturing economy, and according to the latest Livingston Survey, published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, U.S. industrial production is expected to have expanded by 1.8%0.3 percent in 20172023 and is further expected to grow by 2.6%0.5 percent in 20182024 and 2.1%1.4 percent in 2019.2025.

China continues to be a key driver in the growth of global metals demand. According to the International Monetary Fund, China’s GDP grew 6.5% in 2017 and is projected to grow 6.6% in 2018 and 6.3% in 2019.

Products and Services

We carry a full line of carbon steel, stainless steel, alloy steels, and aluminum, and a limited line of nickel and red metals. These materials are stocked in a number of shapes, including coils, sheets, rounds, hexagons, square and flat bars, plates, structurals, and tubing.

We also provide a wide variety of processing services to meet our customers’ needs. Most of the products that we carry require expensive specialized equipment for material handling and processing. We believe few of our customers have the capability to process metal into the desired sizes, forms, or finishes or they are unwilling to incur the significant capital expenditures to acquire the necessary equipment. We are growing and diversifying our product mix mainly as a result of our targeted growth strategy to provide increased levels of value-added processing services. We believe our enhanced processing capabilities will increase our ability to sell higher-margin metals processing services to a larger group of customers. We expect this, together with our focus on maintaining pricing discipline related to our processing services, will increase our gross profit margin.

We had capital expenditures of $358.1 million in the five-year period ended December 31, 2023. We are increasing our investments in processing equipment to offer more value-added processing to our customers in an effort to increase our margins and profitability. We currently perform processing services on nearly 80% of the materials sold by us.

6


The following table showspie charts show our percentage of sales by major product lines for 2017, 2016,2023 and 2015:2022:

img213446697_0.jpgimg213446697_1.jpg

Product Line

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Carbon Steel Flat

 

 

28

%

 

 

28

%

 

 

25

%

Carbon Steel Plate

 

 

10

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

11

 

Carbon Steel Long

 

 

12

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

16

 

Stainless Steel Flat

 

 

18

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

16

 

Stainless Steel Plate

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Stainless Steel Long

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Aluminum Flat

 

 

15

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

Aluminum Plate

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Aluminum Long

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

4

 

Other

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Total

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

More than 75%We are not dependent on any particular customer group or industry because we process and distribute a variety of the materials sold by us are processed. We use processingmetals. This diversity of product type and fabricating techniques such as bending, beveling, blanking, blasting, burning, cutting-to-length, drilling, embossing, flattening, forming, grinding, laser cutting, machining, notching, painting, perforating, punching, rolling, sawing, scribing, shearing, slitting, stamping, tapping, threading, welding,material reduces our exposure to fluctuations or other techniques to process materials to specified thickness, length, width, shape, and surface quality pursuant to specific customer orders. Amongweaknesses in the most common processing techniques used by usfinancial or economic stability of particular customers or industries. We are slitting, which involves cutting coiled metals to specified widths along the length of the coil, and leveling, which involves flattening coiled metals and cutting them to exact lengths. We also use third-party fabricators to outsource certain processes that we are not able to perform internally (suchless dependent on any particular suppliers as pickling and other coating processes or heat treating) to enhance our value-added services.

The plate burning and fabrication processes are particularly important to us. These processes require sophisticated and expensive processing equipment. As a result rather than making investments in such equipment, manufacturers have increasingly outsourced these processes to metals service centers.

As part of securing customer orders, we also provide services to our customers to assure cost effective material application while maintaining or improving the customers’ product quality. Our services include: just-in-time inventory programs, production of configured kits containing multiple custom products for ease of assembly by the customer, consignment arrangements, and the placement of our employees at a customer’s site for inventory managementproduct diversification. See pie charts showing our sales by metal consuming industry within “Customers and productionMarkets” discussion below.

Customers and technical assistance. We also provide special stocking programs in which products that would not otherwise be stocked by us are held in inventory to meet certain customers’ needs. These services are designed to reduce customers’ costs by minimizing their investment in inventory and processing equipment and improving their production efficiency.


Additional financial information is presented in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.Markets

Customers

Our customer base is diverse, numbering approximately 40,000 in a variety of industries, including metal fabrication and machine shops, industrial machinery and equipment, commercial ground transportation, consumer durable, food processing and agricultural equipment, construction equipment, HVAC, and oil & gas. Although we sell directly to many large original equipment manufacturers, the majority of our sales are to smaller customers, including most metal-consuming industries, most of which are cyclical. small machine shops and fabricators, in small quantities with frequent deliveries, helping them manage their working capital and credit needs more efficiently.

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, no single customer, including their subcontractors, accounted for more than 2 percent8% of our sales, and the ourtop 10 customers, including their subcontractors, accounted for less than 12 percent16% of our sales. Substantially all of our sales are attributable to our U.S. operations and substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the United States. U.S.

7


The following table showspie charts show the Company’s percentage of sales by metal consuming industry for 2017, 2016,2023 and 2015:2022:

 

 

Percentage of Sales

 

Metal Consuming Industry

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Metal fabrication and machine shops

 

 

20

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

18

%

Industrial machinery and equipment

 

 

18

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

17

 

Commercial ground transportation

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

18

 

Consumer durable

 

 

11

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

10

 

Food processing and agricultural equipment

 

 

10

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

7

 

Construction equipment

 

 

9

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

8

 

HVAC

 

 

7

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

8

 

Oil & gas

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

7

 

Other

 

 

4

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

7

 

Total

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

img213446697_2.jpgimg213446697_3.jpg

SomeOur customers are primarily located throughout the U.S., but we also have international customers. Our decentralized operating structure and facilities located near or close to most of our largest customers have procurement programs with us, typicallyenable an efficient delivery system capable of handling a high frequency of short lead time orders. We transport our products directly to customers via our in-house and dedicated truck fleet, which further supports the just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers, and via third-party trucking firms.

We process our metals to specific customer orders as well as for stocking programs. Many of our larger customers commit to purchase on a regular basis at agreed upon or indexed prices for periods ranging from three monthsto twelve months. To help mitigate price volatility risks, these price commitments are generally matched with corresponding supply arrangements, or to a lesser degree by commodity hedges. Customers notify us of specific release dates for processed products. Customers typically notify us of release dates anywhere from on a just-in-time basis to one yearmonth before the release date. Consequently, we are required to carry sufficient inventory to meet the short lead time and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers.

We have international facilities located in duration. PricingCanada, Mexico, and China. Net sales of our international locations (based on where the shipments originated) accounted for these contracts is generally9.1% of our consolidated 2023 net sales, or $466.4 million. See Note 13 — “Segment information” of Part II, Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further information on U.S. and foreign revenues and assets.

Customer demand may change from time to time based on, a pricing formula rather than a fixed price foramong other things, general economic conditions and industry capacity. Many of the program duration. However, certain customer contractsindustries in which our customers compete are at fixed prices; to minimizecyclical in nature. We believe that our financial exposure, we generally match these fixed-price sales programs with fixed-price supply programs. In general, sales to customers are priced atvarious and diverse offerings, ways-to-market, and end markets reduce the time of sale based on prevailing market prices.

Suppliers

For the year ended December 31, 2017, our top 25 suppliers accounted for approximately 76%volatility of our purchase dollars. We purchasebusiness in the majority of our inventories at prevailing market prices from key suppliers with which we have established relationships to obtain improvements in price, quality, delivery, and service. We are generally able to meet our materials requirements because we use many suppliers, there is a substantial overlap of product offerings from these suppliers, and there are several other suppliers able to provide identical or similar products. Because of the competitive nature of the business, when metal prices increase due to product demand, mill surcharges, input costs, supplier consolidation, or other factors that in turn lead to supply constraints or longer mill lead times and higher procured material costs, we may not be able to fully pass our increased material costs to customers. In recent decades, there have been significant consolidations among suppliers of carbon steel, stainless steel, and aluminum. We believe we will be able to meet our material requirements and believe we will continue to be among the largest customers of our suppliers.

Sales and Marketing

We maintain our own professional sales force. In addition to our office sales staff, we market and sell our products through the use of our field sales force that we believe has extensive product and customer knowledge and offers a comprehensive catalog of our products. Our office and field sales staffs, which together consist of approximately 680 employees, include technical and metallurgical personnel.

aggregate, thus somewhat reducing earnings volatility. A portion of our customers experience seasonal slowdowns. Our sales, as measured in tonnage sold, in the months of July, November, and December traditionally have been lower than in other months because of a reduced number of shipping days and holiday or vacation closures for some customers. Consequently, our sales in the first two quarters of the year are usually higher than in the third and fourth quarters.

Capital ExpendituresSuppliers

We purchase the majority of our inventories from key domestic metals suppliers. Because of our total volume of purchases and our long‑term relationships with our suppliers, we believe that we are generally able to purchase inventory at the best prices offered by our suppliers.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, our top 25 suppliers, including their subcontractors, accounted for approximately 78% of our purchase dollars. We are generally able to meet our materials requirements because we use many suppliers, there is a substantial overlap of product offerings from these suppliers, and there are several other suppliers able to provide identical or similar

8


products. While the metals producing supply base has experienced significant consolidation and supply interruptions in the past, we believe both our size and our long-term relationships with our suppliers has enabled us to meet our material requirements and will continue to allow us to do so in the future.

Sales and Marketing

We maintain our own professional sales force. In recent yearsaddition to our office sales staff, we market and sell our products through the use of our field sales force that we believe has extensive product and customer knowledge and offers a comprehensive catalog of our products. Our office and field sales staff, which together consist of approximately 850 employees, include technical personnel. Additionally, we offer our customers the ability to purchase our products through our e-commerce website.

Because much of our business is relationship-based, we operate under many different trade names. Businesses we acquire often have made capital expendituresstrong customer relationships and solid reputations, and we will often continue to use the acquired business name to maintain improve,existing customer relationships.

Capital Expenditures

In 2023, we continued to focus on organic growth by expanding and expandmodernizing existing facilities, adding new state-of -the-art facilities, and adding processing capabilities.equipment to support value-added business. Investments by us in property, plant, and equipment, together with asset retirements for the five years ended December 31, 2017,2023, excluding the initial


purchase price of acquisitions are set forth below. The net capital change during such period aggregated to an increase of $53.4$223.2 million.

 

 

Additions

 

 

Retirements
or Sales

 

 

Net

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

2023

 

$

121.9

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

121.5

 

2022

 

 

105.1

 

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

96.8

 

2021

 

 

59.3

 

 

 

68.5

 

 

 

(9.2

)

2020

 

 

26.0

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

25.8

 

2019

 

 

45.8

 

 

 

57.5

 

 

 

(11.7

)

 

 

Additions

 

 

Retirements

or Sales

 

 

Net

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

2017

 

$

25.1

 

 

$

24.9

 

 

$

0.2

 

2016

 

 

23.0

 

 

 

5.0

 

 

 

18.0

 

2015

 

 

22.3

 

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

13.2

 

2014

 

 

21.6

 

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

15.3

 

2013

 

 

20.2

 

 

 

13.5

 

 

 

6.7

 

The net reductions in 2019 and 2021 are related to sale lease-back transactions. See Part II, Item 8, Note 5: Property, Plant, and Equipment for additional information on the 2021 sale-leaseback transactions. The lower amount of additions in 2020 was caused by capital expenditures deferred to 2021 and 2022 as spending was reduced due to uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. We currently anticipate capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, of up to approximately $25$110 million for 2018.2024, much of which is related to purchases geared towards highly accretive strategic initiatives, IT infrastructure investment, and growth, along with maintenance projects. We expect all of the 2024 capital expenditures to be funded using proceeds from the cash generated by operations. We will continue to evaluate and execute each growth project in light of the economic conditions and outlook at the time of investment and may significantly reduce our capital expenditures if economic conditions warrant a more conservative approach to capital allocation. For the long term, we expect capital expenditures will be funded from cash generated by operations and available borrowings.to normalize to a rate that approximates depreciation.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017, we employed approximately 3,300 persons in North America and 300 persons in China. Our North American workforce was comprised of approximately 1,500 office employees and approximately 1,800 plant employees. Twenty percent of our plant employees were members of various unions, including the United Steel Workers and The International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

Six renewal contracts covering approximately 111 employees were successfully negotiated in 2017. Six contracts covering 95 employees are currently scheduled to expire in 2018.

Environmental, Health, and Safety Matters

Our facilities and operations are subject to many foreign, federal, state, local, and localforeign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and to health and safety. In particular, our operations are subject to extensive requirements relating to waste disposal, recycling, air and water emissions, the handling of regulated materials, remediation, underground storage tanks, asbestos-containing building materials, workplace exposure, and other matters. We believe that our operations are currently in substantial compliance with all such laws and do not presently anticipate substantial expenditures in the foreseeable future in order to meet environmental, workplace health or safety requirements, or to pay for any investigations, corrective action, or claims. Claims,However, claims, enforcement actions, or investigations regarding personal injury, property damage, or violation of environmental laws could result in substantial costs to us, divert our management’s attention, and result in significant liabilities, fines, or the suspension or interruption of our facilities.

We continue to analyze and implement safeguards to mitigate any environmental, health, and safety risks we may face. As a result, additional costs and liabilities may be incurred to comply with future requirements, including California and the proposed SEC climate disclosure requirements, or to address newly discovered conditions, and these costs and liabilities could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. For example, there is increasing likelihood that additional regulation of greenhouse gas emissions will occur at the foreign, federal, state, and local level, which could affect us, our suppliers, and our customers. While the costs of compliance could be significant, given the uncertain outcome and timing of future action by the U.S. federal government and states on this issue, we cannot accurately predict the full financial impact of current and future greenhouse gas regulations on our operations or our customers at this time. We do not currently anticipate any new programs disproportionately impacting us compared to our competitors.

9


Some of the properties currently or previously owned or leased by us are located in industrial areas or have a long history of heavy industrial use. We may incur environmental liabilities with respect to these properties in the future including costs of investigations, corrective action, claims for natural resource damages, claims by third parties relating to property damages, or claims relating to contamination at sites where we have sent waste for treatment or disposal. Based on currently available information we do not expect any investigation, remediation matters, or claims related to properties presently or formerly owned, operated, or to which we have sent waste for treatment or disposal would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

In October 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) named usJT Ryerson as one of more than 100 businesses that may be a potentially responsible party for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (the “PHS Site”). On January 6, 2017,Site. See Note 12: Commitments and Contingencies in the EPA issued an initial Recordnotes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of Decision (“ROD”) regardingthis Report on Form 10-K. As the site. The EPA has now requested a Pre-Remedial Design Report (“Pre-RD”) to help determine if the ROD is appropriate or should be reduced.  The Pre-RD is due on May 9, 2019, and a revised ROD should be issued sometime thereafter. The ROD includes a combination of dredging, capping, and enhanced natural recovery that


would take approximately thirteen years to construct plus additional time for monitored natural recovery, at an estimated present value cost of $1.05 billion. The EPA has not yet allocated responsibility for the contamination among the potentially responsible parties, including us. WeJT Ryerson, we do not currently have sufficient information available to us to determine whether the RODRecord of Decision will be executed as currently stated, whether and to what extent weJT Ryerson may be held responsible for any of the identified contamination, and how much (if any) of the final plan’s costs might ultimately be allocated to us.JT Ryerson. Therefore, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or estimate a range of potential loss at this time.

ExcludingThere are various other claims and pending actions against the Company. The amount of liability, if any, potential additional remediation costs resultingfor those claims and actions as of December 31, 2023 is not determinable but, in the opinion of management, such liability, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. We maintain liability insurance coverage to assist in protecting our assets from any corrective action for the properties described above, we expect spending for pollution control projectslosses arising from or related to remain at historical levels below $500,000 per year.activities associated with business operations.

Our United StatesU.S. operations are also subject to the Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. We operate a private trucking motor fleet for making deliveries to some of our customers. Our drivers do not carry any material quantities of hazardous materials. Our foreign operations are subject to similar regulations. Future regulations could increase maintenance, replacement, and fuel costs for our fleet. These costs could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.

Intellectual Property

We own several U.S. and foreign trademarks, service marks, and copyrights. Certain of the trademarks are registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and, in certain circumstances, with the trademark offices of various foreign countries. We consider certain other information owned by us to be trade secrets. We protect our trade secrets by, among other things, entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees regarding such matters and implementing measures to restrict access to sensitive data and computer software source code on a need-to-know basis. We believe that these safeguards adequately protect our proprietary rights and we vigorously defend these rights. While we consider all our intellectual property rights as a whole to be important, we do not consider any single right to be essential to our operations as a whole.

Foreign OperationsSustainability

In December 2023, Ryerson released its second Sustainability Report. The report builds on the Company’s inaugural 2022 report and provides an update on ongoing sustainability efforts, the investments being made in its people and service center network, and how it is serving its communities. Similar to the inaugural report, the 2023 edition illustrates the Company’s focus on energy and emissions reductions, sustainable products, data security, diversity, equity, and inclusion ("DEI"), and talent and future workforce while also providing updates on Ryerson’s advancement in these categories. A few achievements include Ryerson’s recognition by Forbes as one of America’s best mid-sized companies to work for, its launch of the award-winning Ryerson Illuminator app, and its continued role in the circular metals economy.

Additionally, the Sustainability Report includes important content on governance practices, including how we continuously monitor and analyze ourselves and our supply-chain relationships in order to operate with a high level of integrity and how we protect Company and stakeholder information through strong cybersecurity practices. We strive, and expect our suppliers, to comply with all applicable laws and regulations as well as Ryerson's Human Rights Policy, Conflict Minerals Policy, and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct.

Human Capital

In order to provide best in class customer experiences, it is crucial that we continue to work to attract and retain top talent. To facilitate talent attraction and retention, we strive to create a diverse, inclusive, and safe workplace, with opportunities for our

10


employees to grow and develop in their careers, supported by strong compensation, benefits, and wellness programs, and by programs that build connections between our employees and their communities.

Talent and Future Workforce.Our foreign operationsrecruitment and talent management teams lead our mission to attract, retain and develop diverse talent. These teams are organized under our Talent Management Office ("TMO"), which includes our Chief Human Resources Officer, our Director of Talent Management, and other senior leaders. The TMO is responsible for our recruiting efforts, attracting the best talent, increasing diversity and hiring efficiencies, facilitating onboarding, and continuing education opportunities to engage employees as they join Ryerson and build their careers with us.

As part of retaining and developing talent, Ryerson offers employees competitive compensation, expanded benefits including a percentageparental leave policy, career growth through its learning platform, mentorship and tuition reimbursement programs, and engagement through all-employee surveys conducted periodically.

Diversity and Inclusion. Ryerson is embracing diversity and inclusion via our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion council ("DEI Council") that focuses on employee engagement, DEI training, and community outreach efforts with the mission of totalfostering an environment across the organization that values diversity of experiences and perspectives and encourages inclusivity in all aspects of the business.

In 2023, Ryerson’s DEI Council announced the establishment of three employee resource groups ("ERGs") to be available to employees in 2024: Women in Search of Excellence (WISE), Next Generation of Leaders (NextGen), and Leveraging All Diversity (LEAD). These ERGs are voluntary, employee-led groups that work to foster a more inclusive workplace by uniting people with common interests, identities, or backgrounds. Each of the three ERGs established is purposefully aligned with Ryerson’s DEI mission and strategic goals.

Further, Ryerson is invested in DEI training by providing employees with training on being inclusive, avoiding bias, and workplace intervention. Training is available at any time on the Company’s learning platform, where employees can select from a growing catalog of DEI courses.

Employee Health, Wellness, and Safety. Health, safety, and wellness are fundamental expectations of our Board, executives, employees, and our customers. Our safety standards, which go beyond industry standards and the minimum legal requirements, have helped protect the well-being of our people and prevent workplace injuries. Our commitment towards a zero-injury workplace is constant and driven by an Environmental, Health, and Safety policy that reinforces the goal. Our 2023 performance at our facilities, measured as the number of OSHA recordable injuries per 200,000 labor hours, was 2.26, which was better than the industry average as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

We provide our employees and their families with access to a variety of innovative, flexible, and convenient health and wellness programs, including benefits that provide protection and security so they can have peace of mind concerning events that may require time away from work or that impact their financial well-being; that support their physical and mental health by providing tools and resources to help them improve or maintain their health status, and encourage engagement in healthy behaviors; and that offer choice where possible so they can customize their benefits to meet their needs and the needs of their families.

Compensation and Benefits. We provide robust compensation and benefits programs to help meet the financial needs of our employees. In addition to salaries, we provide annual and quarterly sales for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,incentive plans, healthcare and 2015 wereinsurance benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts, retirement savings contribution matching, paid time off, parental leave, employee assistance programs, and tuition assistance. Additionally, we have targeted equity-based grant programs with vesting conditions to facilitate retention of personnel, particularly those with critical skills and experience.

Employee Headcount and Unions. See Item 1A, Risks Related to Operating our Business, sub-section "Any significant work stoppages can harm our business", as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Foreign Location

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Canada

 

 

7

%

 

 

8

%

 

 

8

%

China

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

4

 

Mexico

 

< 1

 

 

< 1

 

 

< 1

 

Our foreign assetswell as a percentage of consolidated assets at December 31, 2017, 2016,Note 12: Commitments and 2015 were as follows:

 

 

At December 31,

 

Foreign Location

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Canada

 

 

10

%

 

 

10

%

 

 

10

%

China

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

Mexico

 

< 1

 

 

< 1

 

 

< 1

 

See Note 13 “Segment Information” ofContingencies within Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for further information on U.S. and foreign revenues and long-lived assets.information.

Ryerson Canada

Ryerson Canada, an indirect wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Ryerson Holding, is a metals service center. Ryerson Canada has facilities in Calgary (AB), Edmonton (AB), Richmond (BC), Winnipeg (MB), Saint John (NB), Brampton (ON), Burlington (ON) (includes Canadian headquarters), and Vaudreuil (QC), Canada.

Ryerson China

Ryerson has been providing metals distribution services in China through equity investments since 2006 with Ryerson China becoming an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Ryerson in 2010.  Ryerson China is based in Kunshan and operates five processing and service centers in Guangzhou, Dongguan, Kunshan, and Tianjin.


Ryerson Mexico

Ryerson Mexico, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Ryerson Holding, operates as a metals service center. Ryerson Holding formed Ryerson Mexico in 2010 to expand operations into the Mexican market. Ryerson Mexico has service centers in Monterrey, Tijuana, Hermosillo, and Queretaro.

Available Information

All periodic and current reports and other filings that we are required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge from the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) or public reference room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 (1-800-SEC-0330), or through our Investor Relations website at www.ir.ryerson.com.http://ir.ryerson.com. Such documents are available as soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing of the material with the SEC. Copies of these reports (excluding

11


exhibits) may also be obtained free of charge, upon written request to: Investor Relations, Ryerson Holding Corporation, 227 W. Monroe St., 27th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

The Company also posts its Code of Ethics on its website. See “Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance—Code of Ethics”Part III, Item 10 for more information regarding our Code of Ethics.

Our website address is included in this report for informationinformational purposes only. Our website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Our business faces many risks. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with the other information in this report, including the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements. We cannot assure you that any of the events discussed in the risk factors below will not occur. These risks could have a material and adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

Risks Related to Our Business and IndustryRISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY

Weakness in the economy, market trends, and other conditions affecting the profitability and financial stability of our customers could negatively impact our sales growth and results of operations.

Economic and industry trends affect our business environments. We serve several metals-consuming industries in which the demand for our products and services is sensitive to the production activity, capital spending, and demand for products and services of our customers. Many of these customers operate in markets that are subject to highly cyclical fluctuations resulting from seasonality, market uncertainty, costs of goods sold, currency exchange rates, foreign competition, offshoring of production, oil and natural gas prices, geopolitical developments, and a variety of other factors beyond our control. Any of these factors could cause customers to idle or close facilities, delay purchases, reduce production levels, or experience reductions in the demand for their own products or services.

Any of these events could impair the ability of our customers to make full and timely payments or reduce the volume of products and services these customers purchase from us and could cause increased pressure on our selling prices and terms of sale.

We do not expect the cyclical nature of our industry to change and any downturn in our customers’ industries could reduce our revenues and profitability or a significant or prolonged slowdown in activity in the United States (U.S.)U.S., Canada, or any other major world economy, or a segment of any such economy, could negatively impact our sales growth and results of operations.

The metals distributionservices business is very competitive and increased competition could reduce our revenues and gross margins.

The metals distribution industry is highly fragmented and competitive, consisting of a large number of small companies and a few relatively large companies. We face competition in all markets we serve.serve, from metals producers that sell directly to certain customers or segments of the market, to other metal services companies. The metals services industry itself is highly fragmented and competitive. There are a few large competitors, but most of the market is served by small local and regional competitors. Competition is based principally on price, service, quality, production capabilities, inventory availability, and timely delivery. Competition in

We are experiencing increased pressure from online businesses that compete with price transparency. We expect technological advancements and the various markets in which we participate comes from companiesincreased use of various sizes, some of which have greater financial resources than we have and some of which have more established brand names ine-commerce solutions within the local markets we serve. Increased competition could reduceindustry to continue to evolve at a rapid pace. As a result, our market share, forceability to effectively compete requires us to lowerrespond and adapt to new industry trends and developments, and implement new technology and innovations that may result in unexpected costs or may take longer than expected.

To remain competitive, we must be willing and able to respond to market pressures timely. These pressures, and the implementation, timing, and results of our prices,strategic pricing and other responses, could have a material effect on our sales and profitability. If we are unable to grow sales or reduce costs, among other actions, to offer increased services at a higher cost, which could reducewholly or partially offset the effect on profitability of our profitability.pricing actions, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.


Changing metals prices may have a significant impact on our liquidity, net sales, gross margins, operating income, and net income.

The metals services industry as a whole is cyclical and, at times, pricing and availability of metal can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our control, including, but not limited to, general domestic and international economic conditions, labor costs, sales levels, competition, levels of inventory held by other metals service centers, consolidation of metals producers, higher raw material costs for the producers of metals, import duties and tariffs, and currency exchange rates. This volatility can significantly

12


affect the availability and cost of materials for us.

Our ability to pass on increases in costs in a timely manner depends on market conditions and may result in lower gross margins. WeIn addition, higher prices could impact demand for our products, resulting in lower sales volumes. Moreover, we maintain substantial inventories of metal to accommodate the short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers. Accordingly, we purchase metals in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon historic buying practices, contracts with customers, and market conditions. WhenCommitments for metal purchases are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time orders are placed or at the time of shipment. During periods of rising metal prices, we may be negatively impacted by delays between the time of increases in the cost of metals to us and increases in the prices that we charge for our products if we are unable to pass these increased costs on to our customers. In addition, when metal prices decline, customer demands for lower prices and our competitors’ responses to those demandsthis could result in lower saleselling prices for our products and, consequently, lower margins as we use existing metals inventory.inventory that we purchased at higher metal prices, lower gross profit margins. Declines in prices or further reductions in sales volumes could adversely impact our ability to maintain our liquidity and to remain in compliance with certain financial covenants under our $750 million$1.3 billion revolving credit facility (the “Ryerson(“the Ryerson Credit Facility”), as well as result in us incurring inventory or goodwill impairment charges. ChangingConsequently, changing metals prices therefore could significantly impact our liquidity, net sales, gross margins, operating income, and net income.

Changes in inflation may adversely affect gross margins.

Inflation impacts the costs at which we can procure product and the ability to increase prices to customers over time. Prolonged periods of deflation could adversely affect the degree to which we are able to increase sales through price increases.

Unexpected product shortages could negatively impact customer relationships, resulting in an adverse impact on results of operations.

Disruptions could occur due to factors beyond our control, including economic downturns, political unrest, port slowdowns, trade issues, including increased export or import duties or trade restrictions, health crises, climate related disruptions, and other factors, anyfactors. Recent unrest in the Red Sea has increased both shipping times and costs presenting new challenges to the metals industry. Any of whichthe aforementioned items could adversely affect a supplier’s ability to manufacture ordeliver products.products to us.

Any disruption resulting from these events could cause significant delays in shipments of products or difficulties in obtaining products, any of which may expose us to unanticipated liability or require us to change our business practices in a manner materially adverse to our business, results of operations, and financial condition. For our sources of lower cost products from Asia and other areas of the world, the risk foreffect of disruptions hasis typically increased due to the additional lead time required and distances involved, and the current political climate seeking trade reform. If we were to experience difficulty in obtaining products, there could be a short-term adverse effect on results of operations and a longer-term adverse effect on customer relationships and our reputation.involved. In addition, we have strategic relationships with a number of vendors. In the event we are unable to maintain those relations, there might be a loss of competitive pricing advantages which could, in turn, adversely affect results of operations.

Changes in customer or product mix could cause theour gross margin percentage to decline.

From time to time, we experience changes in customer and product mix that affect gross margin. Changes in customer and product mix result primarily from business acquisitions, changes in customer demand, customer acquisitions, selling and marketing activities, and competition. If rapid growth with lower margin customers occurs, we will face pressure to maintain current gross margins, as these customers receive more discounted pricing due to their higher sales volume. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain historical gross margins in the future.

We may not be able to retain or expand our customer base if the North American manufacturing industry erodes through acquisition and merger or consolidation activity in our customers’ industries.

Our customer base primarily includes manufacturing and industrial firms. Some of our customers operate in industries that are undergoing consolidation through acquisition and merger activity and some customers have closed as they were unable to compete successfully with overseas competitors. Our facilities are predominately located in the U.S. and Canada. To the extent that our customers cease U.S. operations or relocate to regions in which we do not have a presence, we could lose their business. Acquirers of manufacturing and industrial firms may have suppliers of choice that do not include us, which could impact our customer base and market share.

Global metal overcapacity and imports of metal products into the United States have adversely affected, and may again adversely affect, United States metal prices, which could impact our sales and results of operations.

At times, global metal production capacity may exceed global consumption of metal products. Such excess capacity sometimes results in metal manufacturers in certain countries exporting steel at prices that are lower than prevailing domestic prices and sometimes at or below their cost of production. Excessive imports of metal into the U.S. have exerted and may exert in the future, downward pressure on U.S. steel prices which may negatively affect our results of operations.

13


Lead time and the cost of our products could increase if we were to lose one of our primary suppliers.

If, for any reason, our primary suppliers of aluminum, carbon steel, stainless steel, or other metals should curtail or discontinue their delivery of such metals in the quantities needed and at prices that are competitive, our business could suffer. The number of available suppliers could be reduced by factors such as industry consolidation and bankruptcies affecting steel and metal producers. For the year ended December 31, 2023, our top 25 suppliers represented approximately 78% of our purchases. We could be significantly and adversely affected if delivery were disrupted from a major supplier. If, in the future, we were unable to obtain sufficient amounts of the necessary metals at competitive prices and on a timely basis from our traditional suppliers, we may not be able to obtain such metals from alternative sources at competitive prices to meet our delivery schedules, which could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability.

RISKS RELATED TO MARKET AND ECONOMIC VOLATILITY

Changes in inflation may adversely affect financial performance.

Fluctuations in inflation could result in, and recent inflationary pressures have resulted in, lower revenues, higher costs, and decreased margins, profits, and earnings. Rapid or significant inflation could continue to increase the costs we incur to procure, process, package, and deliver our metal to customers and we may not be able to increase selling prices to customers at the same rate, resulting in decreased margins and operating profits. Prolonged periods of deflation could adversely affect the degree to which we are able to maintain or increase selling prices resulting in decreased revenues, margins, and operating profits. Additionally, prolonged deflation could impact our availability on the Ryerson Credit Facility as the value of our accounts receivable and inventory decreases.

In addition, we rely on arrangements with third-party shipping and freight companies for the delivery of our products. Freight and shipping costs may increase due to inflation, and any such increases could adversely affect our margins unless we are able to increase selling prices at the same rate.

We monitor the risk that the principal markets in which we operate could continue to experience increased inflationary conditions. The onset, duration, and severity of an inflationary period cannot be estimated with precision.

The volatility of the market could result in a material impairment of goodwill.

We evaluate goodwill annually on October 1 and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment. Events or changes in circumstances that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to our historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner or the use of our assets or the strategy for our overall business, and significant negative industry or economic trends. We test for impairment of goodwill by assessing various qualitative factors with respect to developmentdevelopments in our business and the overall economy and calculating the fair value of a reporting unit using a combination of an income approach based on discounted future cash flows and a market approach at the date of valuation.valuation, as necessary. Under the discounted cash flow method, the fair value of each reporting unit is estimated based on expected future economic benefits discounted to a present value at a rate of return commensurate with the risk associated with the investment. Projected cash flows are discounted to present value using an estimated weighted average cost of capital, which considers both returns to equity and debt investors. Please refer to the Section titled “Critical Accounting Estimates - Goodwill,” of Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations,” and Note 1 — “Summary of Accounting and Financial Policies” of Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for further information.

Poor investment performance or other factors could require us to make significant unplanned contributions to our pension plan and future funding for postretirement employee benefits other than pensions also may require substantial payments from current cash flow.

We provide defined benefit pension plans for certain eligible employees and retirees. The performance of the debt and equity markets affect the value of plan assets. A decline in the market value may increase the funding requirements for these plans. The cost of providing pension benefits is also affected by other factors, including interest rates used to measure the required minimum funding levels, the rate of return on plan assets, discount rates used in determining future benefit obligations, future government regulation, and prior contributions to the plans. Significant unanticipated changes in any of these factors may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and cash flows.


14


RISKS RELATED TO EXPANSION AND INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

We may not be able to successfully consummate and complete the integration of future acquisitions, and if we are unable to do so, it could disrupt operations and cause unanticipated increases in costs and/or decreases in revenues and resultresults of operations.

We have grown through a combination of internal expansion, acquisitions, and joint ventures. We intend to continue to grow through selective acquisitions, but we may not be able to identify appropriate acquisition candidates, obtain financing on satisfactory terms, consummate acquisitions, or integrate acquired businesses effectively and profitably into our existing operations. Restrictions contained in the agreements governing our notes, the Ryerson Credit Facility, or our other existing or future debt may also inhibit our ability to make certain investments, including acquisitions, and participations in joint ventures.

Acquisitions, partnerships, joint ventures, and other business combination transactions, both foreign and domestic, involve various inherent risks, such as uncertainties in assessing value, strengths, weaknesses, liabilities, and potential profitability. There is also risk relating to our ability to achieve identified operating and financial synergies anticipated to result from the transactions. Additionally, problems could arise from the integration of acquired businesses, including unanticipated changes in the business or industry or general economic conditions that affect the assumptions underlying the acquisition. Our future success will depend on our ability to complete the integration of these future acquisitions successfully into our operations. Specifically, after any acquisition, customers may choose to diversify their supply chains to reduce reliance on a single supplier for a portion of their metals needs. We may not be able to retain all of our and an acquisition’s customers, which may adversely affect our business and sales. Integrating acquisitions, particularly large acquisitions, requires us to enhance our operational and financial systems and employ additional qualified personnel, management, and financial resources, and may adversely affect our business by diverting management away from day-to-day operations. Further, failure to successfully integrate acquisitions may adversely affect our profitability by creating significant operating inefficiencies that could increase our operating expenses as a percentage of sales and reduce our operating income. In addition, we may not realize expected cost savings from acquisitions. Any one or more of these factors could cause us to not realize the benefits anticipated or have a negative impact on the fair value of the reporting units. Accordingly, goodwill and intangible assets recorded as a result of acquisitions could become impaired.

We may not be able to retain or expand our customer base if the North American manufacturing industry continues to erode through moving offshore or through acquisition and merger or consolidation activity in our customers’ industries.

Our customer base primarily includes manufacturing and industrial firms. Some of our customers operate in industries that are undergoing consolidation through acquisition and merger activity; some are considering or have considered relocating production operations overseas or outsourcing particular functions overseas; and some customers have closed as they were unable to compete successfully with overseas competitors. Our facilities are predominately located in the United States and Canada. To the extent that our customers cease U.S. operations, relocate or move operations overseas to regions in which we do not have a presence, we could lose their business. Acquirers of manufacturing and industrial firms may have suppliers of choice that do not include us, which could impact our customer base and market share.

Certain of our operations are located outside of the United States, which subjects us to risks associated with international activities.

Certain of ourWe have certain operations which are located outside of the United States, primarilyU.S., in Canada, China, and Mexico. We are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), which generally prohibits U.S. companies and their intermediaries from making corrupt payments or otherwise corruptly giving any thinganything of value to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment, and requires companies to maintain adequate record-keeping and internal accounting practices. The FCPA applies to covered companies, individual directors, officers, employees, and agents. Under the FCPA, U.S. companies may be held liable for some actions taken by strategic or local partners or representatives. If we or our intermediaries fail to comply with the requirements of the FCPA, governmental authorities in the United StatesU.S. could seek to impose civil and/or criminal penalties.

Our international operations and potential joint ventures may cause us to incur costs and risks that may distract management from effectively operating our North American business, and such operations or joint ventures may not be profitable.

We maintain foreign operations in Canada, China, and Mexico. International operations are subject to certain risks inherent in conducting business in, and with, foreign countries, including price controls, exchange controls, export controls, economic sanctions, duties, tariffs, limitations on participation in local enterprises, nationalization, expropriation and other governmental action, and changes in currency exchange rates. While we believe that our current arrangements with local partners provide us with experienced business partners in foreign countries, events or issues, including disagreements with our partners, may occur that require attention of our senior executives and may result in expenses or losses that erode the profitability of our foreign operations or cause our capital investments abroad to be unprofitable.

We may be adversely affected by currency fluctuations in the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollar, the Chinese renminbi, the Hong Kong dollar, and the Chinese renminbi.Mexican peso.

We have significant operations in Canada which incur the majority of their metal supply costs in U.S. dollars but earn the majority of their sales in Canadian dollars. Additionally, we have significant assets in China.China and conduct operations in Mexico. We may from time to time experience losses when the value of the U.S. dollar strengthens against the Canadian dollar, or the Chinese renminbi, the Hong Kong dollar, or the Mexican peso, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, we are subject to translation risk when we consolidate our Canadian, Chinese, and ChineseMexican subsidiaries’ net assets into our balance sheet. Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollar, or Chinese renminbi, the Hong Kong dollar, or the Mexican peso could reduce the value of these assets as reported in our financial statements, which could, as a result, reduce our stockholders’ equity.


15


The Chinese government exerts substantial influence over the manner in which we must conduct our business activities, particularly with regards to the land our facilities are located on.

The Chinese government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. Our ability to operate in China may be harmed by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to taxation, import and export tariffs, environmental regulations, land use rights, property, and other matters. We believe that our operations in China are in material compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. However, the central or local governments of the jurisdictions in which we operate may impose new, stricter regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our compliance with such regulations or interpretations. Moreover, the Chinese court system does not provide the same property and contract right guarantees as do courts in the United StatesU.S. and, accordingly, disputes may be protracted and resolution of claims may result in significant economic loss.

Additionally, there is no private ownership of land in China and all land ownership is held by the government of China, its agencies, and collectives, which issue land use rights that are generally renewable. We lease the land where our Chinese facilities are located from the Chinese government. If the Chinese government decided to terminate our land use rights agreements, our assets could become impaired and our ability to meet customer orders could be impacted.

RISKS RELATED TO CYBERSECURITY AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Damage to our information technology infrastructure could harm our business.

The unavailability of any of our computer-based systems for any significant period of time could have a material adverse effect on our operations. In particular, our ability to manage inventory levels successfully largely depends on the efficient operation of our computer hardware and software systems. We use management information systems to track inventory information at individual facilities, provide pricing recommendations for sales quotes, communicate customer information, and aggregate daily sales, margin, and promotional information. Difficulties associated with upgrades, installations of major software or hardware, and integration with new systems could have a material adverse effect on results of operations. We could be required to expend substantial resources to integrateupgrade our information systems or integrate them with the systems of companies we have acquired. The upgrade or integration of these systems may disrupt our business or lead to operating inefficiencies. In addition, these systems are vulnerable to, among other things, damage or interruption from fire, flood, tornado, and other natural disasters, power loss, computer system and network failures, operator negligence, physical and electronic loss of data, or security breaches and computer viruses.

We are subject to cybersecurity risks and may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks.

We depend on the proper functioning and availability of our information technology platform, including communications and data processing systems, in operating our business. These systems include software programs that are integral to the efficient operation of our business. We have established security measures, controls, and procedures, including established recovery procedures for critical systems and business functions, to safeguard our information technology systems and to prevent unauthorized access to such systems and any data processed or stored in such systems, and we periodically evaluate and test the adequacy of such systems, measures, controls, and procedures; however, there can be no guarantee that such systems, measures, controls, and procedures will be effective. Security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of our information, litigation, and potential liability. In addition, cyber incidents that impact the availability, reliability, speed, accuracy, or other proper functioning of these systems could have a significant impact on our operations, and potentially on our results. We may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly evolving types of cyberattacks. A significant cyber incident, including system failure, security breach, disruption by malware, or other damage could interrupt or delay our operations, result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, damage our reputation, cause a loss of customers, or give rise to monetary fines and other penalties, which could be significant. Refer to Item 1C: "Cybersecurity" for further information on our Cybersecurity processes, policies, and programs.

RISKS RELATED TO OPERATING OUR BUSINESS

Any significant work stoppages can harm our business.

As of December 31, 2017,2023, we employed approximately 3,3004,300 persons in North America and 300 persons in China. Our North American workforce was comprised of approximately 1,5001,900 office employees and approximately 1,8002,400 plant employees. TwentySixteen percent of our plant employees were members of various unions, including the United Steel Workers and The International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

SixEight renewal contracts covering approximately 111160 employees were successfully negotiated in 2017. Six2023. Eight contracts covering 95152 employees are currently scheduled to expire in 2018.2024.

16


Certain employee retirement benefit plans are underfunded and the actual cost of those benefits could exceed current estimates, which would require us to fund the shortfall.

As of December 31, 2017,2023, our pension plan had an unfunded liability of $165$63.9 million and our other postretirement benefits plan had an unfunded liability of $35.7 million. Our actual costs for benefits required to be paid may exceed those projected and future actuarial assessments to the extent that those costs exceed the current assessment.


assessments. Under those circumstances, the adjustments required to be made to our recorded liability for these benefits could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and cash payments to fund these plans could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows. We may be required to make substantial future contributions to improve the plan’s funded status.

Future funding for postretirement employee benefits other than pensions also may require substantial payments from current cash flow.

We provide postretirement life insurance and medical benefits to eligible retired employees. Our unfunded postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2017 was $69 million. Our actual costs for benefits required to be paid may exceed those projected and future actuarial assessments to the extent that those costs exceed the current assessment. Under those circumstances, adjustments will be required to be made to our recorded liability for these benefits.

Any prolonged disruption of our processing centers could harm our business.

We have dedicated processing centers that permit us to produce standardized products in large volumes while maintaining low operating costs. We may suffer prolonged disruption in the operations of any of these facilities, whether due to labor or technical difficulties, destruction, or damage sustained as a result of natural disasters or climate-related events to any of the facilities or otherwise.otherwise, which could adversely affect our operating results.

If we are unable to retain, attract, and motivate management and key personnel, it may adversely affect our business.

In order to compete and have continued growth, we must attract, retain, and motivate executives and other key employees, including those in managerial, technical, sales, marketing, and support positions. We believe that our success is due, in part, to our experienced management team. Losing the services of one or more members of our management team such as our CEO, Edward J. Lehner, and CFO, Erich S. Schnaufer, could adversely affect our business and possibly prevent us from improving our operational, financial, and information management systems and controls. We compete to hire employees and then must train them and develop their skills and competencies. In the future, we may need to retain and hire additional qualified sales, marketing, administrative, operating, and technical personnel, and to train and manage new personnel. Our ability to implement our business plan is dependent on our ability to retain, hire, and train a large number of qualified employees each year. Our results of operations could be adversely affected by increased costs due to increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover, or increased employee benefit costs.

Our internationalrisk management strategies may result in losses.

From time to time, we may use fixed-price and/or fixed-volume supplier contracts to offset contracts with customers. Some of our existing supply agreements have required minimum purchase quantities. Under adverse economic conditions, those minimums may exceed our needs. Absent exceptions for force majeure and other circumstances affecting the legal enforceability of the agreements, these minimum purchase requirements may compel us to purchase quantities of raw materials that could significantly exceed our anticipated needs or pay damages to the supplier for shortfalls. In these circumstances, we would attempt to negotiate agreements for new purchase quantities. There is a risk, however, that we would not be successful in reducing purchase quantities, either through negotiation or litigation. If that occurred, we would likely be required to purchase more of a particular raw material in a particular year than we need, negatively affecting our results of operations and potential joint venturescash flows.

Additionally, we may use commodity contracts, foreign exchange contracts, and interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange risk, and interest rate risk. These risk management strategies pose certain risks, including the risk that losses on a hedge position may exceed the amount invested in such instruments. Moreover, a party in a hedging transaction may be unavailable or unwilling to settle our obligations, which could cause us to incur costs and risks that may distract management from effectively operating our North American business, and such operations or joint venturessuffer corresponding losses. A hedging instrument may not be profitable.

We maintain foreign operationseffective in Canada, China, and Mexico. International operations are subject to certaineliminating all of the risks inherent in conducting business in, and with, foreign countries, including price controls, exchange controls, export controls, economic sanctions, duties, tariffs, limitations on participation in local enterprises, nationalization, expropriation and other governmental action, and changes in currency exchange rates. While we believe that our current arrangements with local partners provide us with experienced business partners in foreign countries, events or issues, including disagreements with our partners,any particular position. Our profitability may occur that require attentionbe adversely affected during any period as a result of our senior executives and may result in expenses or losses that erode the profitability of our foreign operations or cause our capital investments abroad to be unprofitable.

Lead time and the cost of our products could increase if we were to lose one of our primary suppliers.

If, for any reason, our primary suppliers of aluminum, carbon steel, stainless steel, or other metals should curtail or discontinue their deliveryuse of such metals in the quantities needed and at prices that are competitive, our business could suffer. The number of available suppliers could be reduced by factors such as industry consolidation and bankruptcies affecting steel and metal producers. For the year ended December 31, 2017, our top 25 suppliers represented approximately 76% of our purchases. We could be significantly and adversely affected if delivery were disrupted from a major supplier. If, in the future, we were unable to obtain sufficient amounts of the necessary metals at competitive prices and on a timely basis from our traditional suppliers, we may not be able to obtain such metals from alternative sources at competitive prices to meet our delivery schedules, which could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability.instruments.

Global metal overcapacity and imports of metal products into the United States have adversely affected, and may again adversely affect, United States metal prices, which could impact our sales and results of operations.RISKS RELATED TO REGULATORY AND LEGAL MATTERS

Global metal production capacity currently exceeds global consumption of metal products. Such excess capacity sometimes results in metal manufacturers in certain countries exporting steel at prices that are lower than prevailing domestic prices and


sometimes at or below their cost of production. Excessive imports of metal into the United States, such as in recent years, have exerted and may continue to exert, downward pressure on United States steel prices which negatively affects our ability to increase our sales and results of operations.

We could incur substantial costs related to environmental, health, and safety laws.

Our operations are subject to increasingly stringent environmental, health, and safety laws. These include laws that impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and establish standards for the treatment, storage, and disposal of regulated materials, and the investigation and remediation of contaminated soil, surface water, and groundwater. Failure to maintain or achieve compliance with these laws or with the permits required for our operations could result in substantial increases in operating costs and capital expenditures. In addition, we may be subject to fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third party claims for property damage or personal injury, worker’s compensation or personal injury claims, cleanup costs, or temporary or permanent discontinuance of operations. Certain of our facilities are located in industrial areas, have a history of heavy industrial use, and have been in operation for many years and, over time, we and other predecessor operators of these facilities have generated, used, handled, and disposed of

17


hazardous and other regulated wastes. Environmental liabilities could exist, including cleanup obligations at these facilities or at off-site locations where materials from our operations were disposed of, which could result in future expenditures that cannot be currently quantified and which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Such liabilities may be imposed without regard to fault or the legality of a party’s conduct and may, in certain circumstances, be joint and several. Future changes to environmental, health, and safety laws, including those related to climate change, could result in material liabilities and costs, constrain operations, or make such operations more costly for us, our suppliers, and our customers.

In October 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”(the “EPA”) named usJT Ryerson as one of more than 100 businesses that may be a potentially responsible party for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (the “PHS Site”), which includes in-riverSite. See Note 12: Commitments and upland portions. On January 6, 2017,Contingencies in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Report on Form 10-K. As the EPA issued an initial Record of Decision (“ROD”) regarding the site. The EPA has now requested a Pre-Remedial Design Report (“Pre-RD”) to help determine if the ROD is appropriate or should be reduced.  The Pre-RD is due on May 9, 2019, and a revised ROD should be issued sometime thereafter. The ROD has an estimated present value cost of approximately $1.05 billion in total and would take approximately 13 years to complete. The allocation ofnot yet allocated responsibility for the contamination among the potentially responsible parties, including JT Ryerson, has not yet been determined. Wewe do not currently have sufficient information available to us to determine whether the RODRecord of Decision will be executed as currently stated, whether and to what extent JT Ryerson may be held responsible for any of the identified contamination, and how much (if any) of the final plan’s costs might ultimately be allocated to JT Ryerson, the total cost of any required investigation or remediation of the PHS Site and therefore,Ryerson. Therefore, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or estimate a range of potential loss at this time.

Environmental, social, and governance matters, and any related reporting obligation may impact our business

Our business is subject to evolving corporate governance and public disclosure regulations and expectations, including with respect to environmental, social, and governance matters ("ESG"), that could expose us to numerous risks. These rules and regulations continue to evolve in scope and complexity, and many new requirements have been created in response to laws enacted by Congress, making compliance more difficult and uncertain. In addition, increasingly regulators, customers, investors, employees, and other stakeholders are focusing on ESG type matters and related disclosures. Our implementation of these evolving rules and regulations will require additional resources and implementation of new practices and reporting processes, all entailing additional compliance risk. Moreover, the progress and disclosure of our initiatives within the ESG scope could be criticized for accuracy, adequacy, and completeness, or may not advance at a sufficient pace. If our ESG-related data, processes, and reporting are incomplete or inaccurate, or if we fail to achieve progress with respect to our sustainability goals, or at all, our reputation, business, financial performance, and growth could be adversely affected.

Overall increased emphasis of ESG in itself and ESG reporting has increased stakeholder focus, including by U.S. and foreign governmental authorities, investors, and customers on environmental sustainability matters, such as climate change, the reduction of greenhouse gases, and water consumption. Legislative, regulatory, or other efforts to combat climate change or other environmental concerns could result in future increases in taxes, restrictions on or increases in the costs of supplies, transportation, and utilities, any of which could increase our operating costs, and necessitate future investments in facilities and equipment. Further, the customers we serve may impose emissions reduction or other environmental standards and requirements. As a result, we may experience increased compliance burdens and costs and the sourcing of our products may be adversely affected. These risks also include the increased pressure to make commitments, set targets, or establish additional goals and take actions to meet them, which could expose us to market, operational, execution, and reputation costs or risks.

Regulations related to conflict-free minerals may force us to incur additional expenses and place us at a competitive disadvantage.

On August 22, 2012, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the United States SEC adopted new requirements for reporting companies that use certain minerals and metals, known as “conflict minerals”, in their products, whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. These requirements require companies to diligence, disclose, and report whether or not such minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. Since our supply chain is complex, we may not be able to conclusively verify the origins for all metals used in our products and we may face reputational challenges with our customers. Additionally, as there may be only a limited number of suppliers offering “conflict free” metals, we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain necessary metals from such suppliers in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Accordingly, we could incur significant costcosts related to the compliance process, including potential difficulty or added costs in satisfying the disclosure requirements. Moreover, we may encounter challenges to satisfy those customers who require that all of the components of our products be certified as conflict free which could place us at a competitive disadvantage if we are unable to do so.

Tax changes could affect our effective tax rate, the value of our deferred tax assets, and future profitability.

Our future results could be adversely affected by changes in the effective tax rate or changes in the treatment of deferred tax assets as a result of changes in Ryerson’s overall profitability, and changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in tax legislation, the results of the examination of previously filed tax returns, and continuing assessment of the Company’s tax exposures. In particular, although the passage of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 reduced the U.S. tax rate to 21%, our future earnings could be negatively impacted by changes in tax legislation including changing tax rates and tax base such as

18


limiting, phasing-out, or eliminating deductions or tax credits, changing rules for earnings repatriations, and changing other tax laws in the U.S. or other countries.

We are subject to litigation that could strain our resources and distract management.

From time to time, we are involved in a variety of claims, lawsuits, and other disputes arising in the ordinary course of business. These suits concern issues including product liability, contract disputes, employee-related matters, and personal injury matters. It is


not feasible to predict the outcome of all pending suits and claims, and the ultimate resolution of these matters as well as future lawsuits that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or reputation.

We may face product liability claims that are costly and create adverse publicity.

If any of the products that we sell cause harm to any of our customers, we could be exposed to product liability lawsuits. If we were found liable under product liability claims, we could be required to pay substantial monetary damages. Further, even if we successfully defended ourselves against this type of claim, we could be forced to spend a substantial amount of money in litigation expenses, our management could be required to spend valuable time in the defense against these claims, and our reputation could suffer.

RISKS RELATED TO OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK

Our risk management strategies may resultstock price has fluctuated in losses.

From time to time, we may use fixed-price and/or fixed-volume supplier contracts to offset contracts with customers. Additionally, we may use foreign exchange contractsthe past, has recently been volatile, and interest rate swaps to hedge Canadian dollar, Euro, and floating rate debt exposures. These risk management strategies pose certain risks, including the risk that losses on a hedge position may exceed the amount invested in such instruments. Moreover, a party in a hedging transaction may be unavailable or unwilling to settle our obligations, which could cause us to suffer corresponding losses. A hedging instrument may not be effectivevolatile in eliminating all of the risks inherent in any particular position. Our profitability may be adversely affected during any periodfuture, and as a result, investors in our common stock could incur substantial losses.

We may incur rapid and substantial decreases in our stock price in the foreseeable future that are unrelated to our operating performance or prospects.

As a result of use of such instruments.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

this volatility, investors may experience losses on their investment in our common stock. The market price for our common stock may be volatile.influenced by many factors, including the following:

investor reaction to our business strategy;
the success of competitive products or technologies;
any developments with respect to our pursuit of strategic alternatives, including a potential sale or merger of the Company, sale of part of the Company, strategic minority investment, or licensing and other transactions;
changes in regulatory or industry standards applicable to our products;
variations in our financial and operating results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;
developments concerning our collaborations or partners;
developments or disputes with any third parties that supply, manufacture, sell, or market any of our products;
actual or perceived defects in any of our products, if commercialized, and any related product liability claims;
our ability or inability to raise additional capital and the terms on which we raise it;
declines in the market prices of stocks generally;
trading volume of our common stock;
sales of our common stock by us or our stockholders;
general economic, industry, and market conditions; and
other events or factors, including those resulting from such events, or the prospect of such events, including war, terrorism, and other international conflicts, public health issues including health epidemics or pandemics, and natural disasters such as fire, hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, or other adverse weather and climate conditions, whether occurring in the U.S. or elsewhere, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of our suppliers, or result in political or economic instability.

Historically, there has beenIn the past, following periods of volatility in the market, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management's attention and resources, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects.

19


There can be no guarantee that our stock price forwill remain at current levels or that future sales of our common stock will not be at prices lower than those sold to investors.

We paid cash dividends on our common stock in each quarter of 2023, but any future dividend payments are at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

Since the third quarter of 2021 we have paid regular quarterly cash dividends on our common stock. Furthermore,Any declaration and payment of cash dividends on our common stock in the future, whether at current levels or at all, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Therefore, you should not rely on dividend income from shares of our common stock. For more information, see "Dividend Policy" of Part II, Item 5 "Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities". Your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment in us may be if the market price of our common stock appreciates and you sell your shares at a profit, but there is no guarantee that the market price for our common stock will ever exceed the price that you pay for our common stock.

Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain provisions that could fluctuate substantiallydiscourage, delay, or prevent a change in control of the future in response toCompany.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions:

establish a numberclassified Board of factors, including, butDirectors so that not limitedall members of our Board of Directors are elected at one time;
authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the risk factors described herein. Examples include:

changes in commodity prices, especially metals;

rights of the holders of common stock;

announcementprovide that the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to make, alter, or repeal our amended and restated bylaws;

prohibit stockholders from acting by written consent if less than a majority of the voting power of our quarterly operating resultsoutstanding stock is controlled by Platinum; and
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board of Directors or the operating resultsfor proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay, or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of other metals service centers;our company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for our stockholders to elect directors of their choosing.

changes in financial estimates or recommendations byAny issuance of preferred stock market analysts regardingcould make it difficult for another company to acquire us or our competitors;

the operating and stock performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable;

press releases, earnings releases, or publicity relating to us or our competitors or relating to trends in the metals service center industry;

inability to meet securities analysts’ and investors’ quarterly or annual estimates or targets of our performance;

salescould otherwise adversely affect holders of our common stock, by large or controlling shareholders;

which could depress the amount of shares acquired for short-term investments;

general domestic or international economic, market, and political conditions; and

announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, dispositions or joint ventures, or other material events impacting the domestic or global metals industry.

In the past, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their specific operating performance. These factors may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue preferred stock regardlessand to determine the preferences, limitations, and relative rights of actual operating performance.

In addition,shares of preferred stock markets from timeand to time experience extreme pricefix the number of shares constituting any series and volume fluctuations that maythe designation of such series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. Our preferred stock could be unrelated or disproportionateissued with voting, liquidation, dividend, and other rights superior to the operating performancerights of companies. In the past, some shareholders have brought securities class action lawsuits against companies following periodsour common stock. The potential issuance of volatilitypreferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us, discouraging bids for our common stock at a premium over the market price, and adversely affect the market price and the voting and other rights of their securities. We may in the future be the targetholders of similar litigation. Securities litigation, regardless of whether our defense is ultimately successful, could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources.common stock.


RISKS RELATED TO OUR CAPITAL STRUCTURE

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness under our Ryerson Credit Facility, which could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our financial obligations.

We currently have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2017,2023, our total indebtedness under the Ryerson Credit Facility was approximately $1,045.7$433 million and we had approximately $264$560 million of unused capacity underon the Ryerson Credit Facility.facility. Our substantial indebtedness may:

make it difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations, including making scheduled principal and interest payments on our outstanding notes and our other indebtedness;

limit our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or other general corporate purposes;

20


limit our ability to use our cash flow for future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or other general corporate purposes;

require us to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make debt service payments;

limit our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business and industry;

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our less leveraged competitors; and

increase our vulnerability to the impact of adverse economic and industry conditions.

We may also incur additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the Ryerson Credit Facility and the indenture governing our outstanding notes restrict but do not prohibit us from doing so, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. If new indebtedness is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

The covenants in the Ryerson Credit Facility and the indenture governing our notes impose, and covenants contained in agreements governing indebtedness that we incur in the future may impose restrictions that may limit our operating and financial flexibility.

The Ryerson Credit Facility and the indenture governing our outstanding notes containcontains a number of significant restrictions and covenants that limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries, including JT Ryerson, to:

incur additional debt;

pay dividends on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock;

make certain investments or other restricted payments;

create liens or use assets as security in other transactions;

merge, consolidate, transfer, or dispose of substantially all of our assets; and

engage in transactions with affiliates.

The terms of the Ryerson Credit Facility require that, in the event availability under the facility declines to a certain level, we maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio at the end of each fiscal quarter. Total credit availability is limited by the amount of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and qualified cash pledged as collateral under the agreement insofar as the Company is subject to a borrowing base comprised of the aggregate of these three amounts, less applicable reserves. As of December 31, 2017,2023, total credit availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility was $264$560 million. See discussion regarding the Ryerson Credit Facility in Note 9: “Debt” of Part II, Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” as well as the discussion within the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Additionally, subject to certain exceptions, the indenture governing the outstanding notes restricts JT Ryerson’s ability to pay Ryerson Holding dividends. Our future indebtedness may contain covenants more restrictive in certain respects than the restrictions contained in the Ryerson Credit Facility and the indenture governing the notes.Facility. Operating results below current levels or other adverse factors, including a significant increase in interest rates, could result in our being unable to comply with financial covenants that are contained in the Ryerson Credit Facility or that may be contained in any future indebtedness. In addition, complying with these covenants may also cause us to take actions that are not favorable to holders of our notesstockholders and may make it more difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy and compete against companies that are not subject to such restrictions.


We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness.

We are highly leveraged. Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. OurBalances outstanding notes,on the Ryerson Credit Facility and our other outstanding indebtedness are expected to account for significant cash interest expenses. Accordingly, we will have to generate significant cash flows from operations to meet our debt service requirements. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service and working capital requirements, we may be required to sell assets, seek additional capital, reduce capital expenditures, restructure or refinance all or a portion of our existing indebtedness, or seek additional financing. Moreover, insufficient cash flow may make it more difficult for us to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.

The right to receive payment onBecause the 2022 Notes and the guarantees will be subordinated to the liabilities of non-guarantor subsidiaries.

The notes and related guarantees are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness of our subsidiaries that are non-guarantors of the 2022 Senior Secured Notes (the “2022 Notes”). While the indenture governing the 2022 Notes limits the indebtedness and activities of these non-guarantor subsidiaries, holders of indebtedness of, and trade creditors of, non-guarantor subsidiaries, including lenders under bank financing agreements, are entitled to payments of their claims from the assets of such subsidiaries before those assets are made available for distribution to any guarantor, as direct or indirect shareholder. While the non-guarantor subsidiaries have agreed under the indenture not to pledge or encumber their assets (other than with respect to permitted liens) without equally and ratably securing the notes, they will not guarantee the 2022 Notes notwithstanding any such pledge or encumbrance in favor of the 2022 Notes.

The non-guarantor subsidiaries represented, respectively, 12.0% and 6.2% of our net sales and EBITDA for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, these non-guarantor subsidiaries represented respectively, 15.4% and 14.2% of our assets and liabilities, as of December 31, 2017.

Accordingly, in the event that any of the non-guarantor subsidiaries or joint venture entities become insolvent, liquidates, or otherwise reorganizes:

the creditors of the guarantors (including the holders of the 2022 Notes) will have no right to proceed against such subsidiary’s assets; and

the creditors of such non-guarantor subsidiary, including trade creditors, will generally be entitled to payment in full from the sale or other disposal of assets of such subsidiary, as direct or indirect shareholder, and will be entitled to receive any distributions from such subsidiary.

Because a portionmajority of our indebtedness bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain prevailing short-term interest rates, we are vulnerable to interest rate increases.

A portionThe majority of our indebtedness, including the Ryerson Credit Facility, bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain short-term prevailing interest rates. As of December 31, 2017,2023, we had approximately $384.2$433.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility, with an additional $264$560 million available for borrowing under such facility. Assuming a consistent level of

21


debt through-out 2023 a 100 basis point changeincrease in the interest rate on our floating rate debt effective from the beginning of the year would increase or decrease our interest expense under the Ryerson Credit Facility and the China credit facility by approximately $2.7$4.7 million, on an annual basis. The Federal Reserve has continued to increase interest rates in 2023, increasing our interest expense on the Ryerson Credit Facility. If interest rates increase dramatically,continue to rise in the future, we could be unable to service our debt, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Changes in our credit ratings and outlook may reduce access to capital and increase borrowing costs.

Our credit ratings are based on a number of factors, including our financial strength and factors outside of our control, such as conditions affecting our industry generally or the introduction of new rating practices and methodologies. We cannot provide assurances that our current credit ratings will remain in effect or that the ratings will not be lowered, suspended, or withdrawn entirely by the rating agencies. If rating agencies lower, suspend, or withdraw the ratings, the market price or marketability of our securities may be adversely affected. In addition, any negative change in ratings could make it more difficult for us to raise capital on acceptable terms, impact the ability to obtain adequate financing, and result in higher interest costs for our existing credit facilities, including the Ryerson Credit Facility, or on future financings.


RISKS RELATED TO OUR STOCKHOLDER BASE

Platinum owns a significantsubstantial percentage of our stock and has the right to nominate a majority of thetwo members of the Corporation’s board and will be able to exert controlinfluence over matters subject to stockholder approval.approval.

Platinum owns approximately 21,037,5003,924,478 shares of our common stock, which is approximately 57%11.5% of our issued and outstanding common stock. Therefore, Platinum may be able to determineinfluence all matters requiring stockholder approval. For example, Platinum may be able to controlinfluence elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transaction. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our common stock that our stockholders may believe are in their best interest as stockholders.

The Company is party to an investor rights agreement (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) with certain affiliates of Platinum which provides, among other things, that for so long as Platinum collectively beneficially owns (i) at least 30% of the voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the Company, Platinum will have the right to nominate for election to the board of directors of the Company no fewer than that number of directors that would constitute a majority of the number of directors if there were no vacancies on the board, (ii) at least 15% but less than 30% of the voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the Company, Platinum will have the right to nominate two directors, and (iii) at least 5% but less than 15% of the voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the Company, Platinum will have the right to nominate one director. The agreement also provides that if the size of the board of directors is increased or decreased at any time, Platinum’s nomination rights will be proportionately increased or decreased, respectively, rounded up to the nearest whole number. As a resultBased on Platinum's current voting power of Platinum’s ownership of a majority of the Company’s outstanding capital stock as well its board nomination rightsof the Company and the current size of the Board, Platinum has the right to nominate up to two directors pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement,Agreement. As a result, Platinum may significantly influence or effectively control our policies and operations, including the appointment of management, future issuances of our common stock or other securities, and the payment of dividends. In addition, Platinum has significant control over ourdividends, as well as impact decisions to enter into any other corporate transaction.

The interests of Platinum may not in all cases be aligned with the interests of the other holders of our common stock. For example, a sale of a substantial number of shares of stock in the future by Platinum could cause our stock price to decline. Further, Platinum could cause us to make acquisitions that increase the amount of the indebtedness that is secured or senior to the Company’s existing debt or sell revenue-generating assets, impairing our ability to make payments under such debt. Additionally, Platinum is in the business of making investments in companies and may from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Accordingly, Platinum may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. In addition, Platinum may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their equity investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to holders of our common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

22


ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY.

We are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements becausecommitted to protecting Company information and the confidential information of our employees, customers, partners, and suppliers. To that end, we have in place various policies, procedures, and processes to identify, assess, manage, and prevent potential cybersecurity risk's, and to timely detect the occurrence, and mitigate the effects of, cyberattacks and data breaches. Our Chief Information Officer ("CIO"), who has more than 25 years of information security and cybersecurity experience, manages cybersecurity, and oversees a team of dedicated cybersecurity personnel with various experience and certifications in information security and cybersecurity. Our personnel, along with external parties engaged to assess the sufficiency of our risk management processes (e.g., through penetration testing), continuously work to maintain and improve our cybersecurity program and the security and integrity of our information systems and infrastructure through our ongoing risk management program, including (i) by conducting cybersecurity assessments and audits to address threats and to stay in step with emerging malicious trends, and (ii) by performing due diligence on partners and suppliers to ensure similar values and appropriate security standards and safeguards are maintained by such partners and suppliers with respect to our information security assets and to third-party systems on which we rely. In addition, our Incident Response Team is trained to identify, quarantine, and remediate cybersecurity threats, and all of our employees are regularly trained to increase awareness of threats and to identify how to spot and avoid them.

Cybersecurity is a “controlled company” withinformal component of our overall risk management program, and our management, including our Chief Information Officer, regularly update the meaningAudit Committee of the NYSE rules and, as a result, our stockholders do not have the protections afforded by these corporate governance requirements.

Because Platinum controls more than 50%Board of the voting powerstatus of our common stock, wecybersecurity program. In the event that management identifies significant cybersecurity risk exposures, it will present such exposures to the Audit Committee, which oversees the actions, security, and risk mitigation efforts taken across our cybersecurity framework. With this input from management, the Audit Committee evaluates our cybersecurity risks and the responses implemented to prevent and/or mitigate any such risks.

We have adopted an incident response plan that applies in the event of a cybersecurity incident involving a breach of our information technology systems and applications. Pursuant to this response plan, in the event of an incident, a multi-disciplinary team is assembled that is led by our CIO. The team in turn may leverage the expertise of third-party consultants, external legal counsel, and other resources. The plan includes procedures designed to facilitate containment of, and responses to, a cybersecurity incident, which are considered to be a “controlled company” for purposesbased on the type of incident, the location of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing requirements. Underincident, and the NYSE rules, a “controlled company” may elect not to comply with certain NYSE corporate governance requirements, including (1) the requirement that a majority of our Board of Directors consist of independent directors, (2) the requirement that the nominating and corporate governance committee of our Board of Directors be composed entirely of independent directors, (3) the requirement that the compensation committee of our Board of Directors be composed entirely of independent directors, and (4) the requirement for an annual performance evaluationbreadth of the nomination/corporate governanceincident. The plan also establishes procedures for escalating incidents depending on severity and compensation committees. Given that Platinum controls a majority of the voting power offor notifying any impacted parties, including our common stock, we are permitted,customers, law enforcement and have elected, to opt out of compliance with certain NYSE corporate governance requirements. Accordingly, holders of our common stock do not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

regulatory authorities, third-party vendors, and insurance providers. Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control of the Company.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions:

establish a classified Board of Directors so that not all members of our Board of Directors are elected at one time;

authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superiorCIO will provide periodic updates to the rights of the holders of common stock;

provide thatAudit Committee and, when appropriate, the Board of Directors is expressly authorizedduring this process. In addition to make, alter, or repealinternal resources, we utilize third-party service providers to supplement and maintain our amendedcybersecurity and restated bylaws;our information technology systems.

prohibit stockholders from acting by written consent if less than a majorityAs of the voting powerdate of this report, we are not aware of any material risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any cybersecurity incident, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, us, our outstanding stock is controlled by Platinum; and


establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay, or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for our stockholders to elect directors of their choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions they desire.

Any issuance of preferred stock could make it difficult for another company to acquire us or could otherwise adversely affect holders of our common stock, which could depress the price of our common stock.

Our Board of Directors will have the authority to issue preferred stock and to determine the preferences, limitations, and relative rights of shares of preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. Our preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend, and other rights superior to the rights of our common stock. The potential issuance of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us, discouraging bids for our common stock at a premium over the market price, and adversely affect the market price and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.

We have not and do not intend to pay regular cash dividends on our stock.

We do not anticipate declaring or paying regular cash dividends on our common stock or any other equity security in the foreseeable future. The amounts that may be available to us to pay cash dividends are restricted under our debt agreements. Any payment of cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend uponbusiness strategy, our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements,or our financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Therefore, you should not rely on dividend income from shares of our common stock. For more information, see “Dividend Policy.” Your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment in us may be if the market price of our common stock appreciates and you sell your shares at a profit, but there is no guarantee that the market price for our common stock will ever exceed the price that you pay for our common stock.condition.

23


ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.2. PROPERTIES.

Not applicable.


ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES.

As of December 31, 2017,2023, the Company’s facilities are set forth below:

Operations in the United States

JT Ryerson maintains 79and its U.S. affiliates maintain 96 operational facilities, including 510 locations that are dedicated to administration services. All of our metals service center facilities are in good condition and are adequate for JT Ryerson’s existing operations. Approximately 44%67% of these facilities are leased. The lease terms expire at various times through 2027. Owned properties noted as vacated below have been closed and are in the process of being sold.2043. JT Ryerson’s properties and facilities are adequate to serve its present and anticipated needs.

Location

Own/Lease

Birmingham, AL

Owned

Mobile, AL

Owned

Fort Smith, AR

Owned

Hickman, AR**

Leased

Little Rock, AR**

OwnedLeased

Phoenix, AZ

OwnedLeased

Dos Palos, CACerritos, CA*

Leased

Fresno, CA (2)

Leased

Livermore, CA

Leased

Vernon,Santa Clara, CA

OwnedLeased

Commerce City, COVernon, CA

Owned

South Windsor, CTCommerce City, CO

Leased/VacatedOwned

Wilmington, DE

OwnedLeased

Jacksonville, FL

Owned

Tampa Bay, FL

OwnedLeased

Norcross, GABuford, GA***

Leased

Norcross, GA**Lavonia, GA

OwnedLeased

Des Moines, IANorcross, GA

Owned

Eldridge, IA**Des Moines, IA

LeasedOwned

Marshalltown, IAEldridge, IA**

OwnedLeased

Boise, IDMarshalltown, IA

LeasedOwned

Chicago, IL (Headquarters)*

Leased

Chicago, IL

Leased

Chicago, ILDowners Grove, IL*

Leased/VacatedLeased

Dekalb,Elgin, IL

Leased

Elgin, ILLisle, IL*

Leased

Lisle, IL*Loves Park, IL

Leased

Burns Harbor, INMontgomery, IL***

OwnedLeased

Indianapolis, INUniversity Park, IL

OwnedLeased

Wichita, KSBurns Harbor, IN

LeasedOwned

Shelbyville, KY**Indianapolis, IN

Owned

Shreveport, LAPortage, IN**

Owned

St. Rose, LARichmond, IN***

OwnedLeased

Devens, MAShelbyville, KY**

OwnedLeased

Grand Rapids, MI*Shreveport, LA

LeasedOwned

Lansing, MISt. Rose, LA

LeasedOwned

Minneapolis, MNDevens, MA

Owned

Plymouth, MNGrand Rapids, MI*

OwnedLeased

Maryland Heights, MOLansing, MI

Leased

Minneapolis, MN

Leased

Plymouth, MN

Owned

Maryland Heights, MO

Leased

North Kansas City, MO

OwnedLeased

Jackson, MSSt. Louis, MO

Owned

Charlotte, NC**Jackson, MS

Owned

Charlotte, NC

Owned/VacatedOwned

Charlotte,Greensboro, NC (2)

LeasedOwned

24



Greensboro,Pikeville, NC

OwnedLeased

Pikeville, NCWinston-Salem, NC*

Leased

Youngsville, NC

Leased

Omaha, NE

Owned

Lancaster, NYDover, NH

OwnedLeased

Columbus, OHHampstead, NH*

Leased

Hamilton, OH*Las Vegas, NV

Leased

Hilliard, OHLancaster, NY

OwnedLeased

Streetsboro,Cincinnati, OH

LeasedOwned

Strongsville,Columbus, OH

OwnedLeased

Warren, OHHamilton, OH*

Leased/VacatedLeased

Oklahoma City, OKHilliard, OH

OwnedLeased

Tulsa, OKStow, OH***

OwnedLeased

Tigard, ORStreetsboro, OH

Leased

Ambridge, PA**Strongsville, OH

OwnedLeased

Fairless Hills, PA**Oklahoma City, OK

Leased

Pittsburgh, PA*Tulsa, OK

Leased/VacatedLeased

Charleston, SC*Ambridge, PA**

OwnedLeased

Greenville, SCHyde Park, PA***

OwnedLeased

Welford, SCNorth Huntingdon, PA

Owned

Chattanooga, TNCharleston, SC**

Owned

Chattanooga, TNGreenville, SC

LeasedOwned

Gallatin, TNWellford, SC

LeasedOwned

Knoxville, TN*Chattanooga, TN

Leased

Memphis, TNKnoxville, TN*

OwnedLeased

Dallas, TXMemphis, TN

OwnedLeased

El Paso, TXArlington, TX***

Leased

Houston,Dallas, TX

OwnedLeased

Houston, TX(2)El Paso, TX

Leased

McAllen, TXHouston, TX***

LeasedOwned

Odessa, TXHouston, TX***

Leased/VacatedLeased

Houston, TX (2)

Leased

McAllen, TX

Leased

Salt Lake City, UT

Leased

Pounding Mill, VA

OwnedLeased

Richmond, VA

OwnedLeased

Renton,Centralia, WA

OwnedLeased

Spokane, WA

OwnedLeased

Green Bay, WIVancouver, WA*

Leased

Green Bay, WI

Owned

Hammond,Green Bay, WI

Leased

Milwaukee,Hammond, WI

Leased

Milwaukee, WI (2)

Owned

Schofield, WI

Owned

Wausau, WI

Owned

* Office space only

** Processing centers

***Toll Processing centers

25


*

Office space only

**

Processing centers


Operations in Canada

Ryerson Canada, a wholly-owned indirect Canadian subsidiary of Ryerson Holding, has 9ten operational facilities in Canada. All of the metals service center facilities are in good condition and are adequate for Ryerson Canada’s existing and anticipated operations. FourFive facilities are leased. The lease terms expire at various times through 2025.2027.

Location

Own/Lease

Calgary, AB

Owned

Edmonton, AB

Owned

Richmond, BC

Owned

Winnipeg, MB

Owned

Winnipeg, MB

Leased

Saint John, NB

Owned

Brampton, ON

Leased

Burlington, ON (includes Canadian Headquarters)

Leased

Laval, QCMississauga, ON

Leased/VacatedLeased

Vaudreuil, QC

Leased

Operations in China

Ryerson China, an indirect wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Ryerson Holding, has fivefour service and processing centers in China, atin Guangzhou, Dongguan, Kunshan, and Tianjin, performing coil processing, sheet metal fabrication, and plate processing. Ryerson China’s headquarters office building is located in Kunshan. We own four buildings inall of our China facilities and have purchased the related land use rights. The remaining facility is leased. All of the facilities are in good condition and are adequate for Ryerson China’s existing and anticipated operations.

Operations in Mexico

Ryerson Mexico, an indirect wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Ryerson Holding, has four facilities in Mexico. We have service centers in Monterrey, Tijuana, Hermosillo, and Queretaro, all of which are leased. The lease terms expire at various times through 2029. The facilities are in good condition and are adequate for Ryerson Mexico’s existing and anticipated operations.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

For information concerning legal proceedings as of December 31, 2023, please refer to Note 12: Commitments and Contingencies in the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) named us as one of more than 100 businesses that may be a potentially responsible party fornotes to the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (“Portland Harbor”). On January 6, 2017, the EPA issued an initial Record of Decision (“ROD”) regarding the site. The EPA has now requested a Pre-Remedial Design Report (“Pre-RD”) to help determine if the ROD is appropriate or should be reduced.  The Pre-RD is due on May 9, 2019, and a revised ROD should be issued sometime thereafter. The ROD includes a combination of dredging, capping, and enhanced natural recovery that would take approximately thirteen years to construct plus additional time for monitored natural recovery, at an estimated present value cost of $1.05 billion. The EPA has not yet allocated responsibility for the contamination among the potentially responsible parties, including JT Ryerson. We do not currently have sufficient information available to us to determine whether the ROD will be executed as currently stated, whether and to what extent JT Ryerson may be held responsible for any of the identified contamination, and how much (if any) of the final plan’s costs might ultimately be allocated to JT Ryerson and therefore, management cannot predict the ultimate outcomeconsolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this matter or estimate a range of potential loss atReport on Form 10-K, which is incorporated into this time.item by reference.

There are various other claims and pending actions against the Company. The amount of liability, if any, for those claims and actions at December 31, 2017 is not determinable but, in the opinion of management, such liability, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. We maintain liability insurance coverage to assist in protecting our assets from losses arising from or related to activities associated with business operations.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.


26


PART II

ITEM  5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information for Common Stock

Our common stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”)under the symbol “RYI” and was first traded on August 13, 2014. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of our common stock as reported by the NYSE.

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

First Quarter

 

$

14.85

 

 

$

9.25

 

 

$

5.80

 

 

$

2.53

 

Second Quarter

 

 

14.65

 

 

 

7.80

 

 

 

18.33

 

 

 

4.86

 

Third Quarter

 

 

11.03

 

 

 

7.65

 

 

 

19.71

 

 

 

10.03

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

11.05

 

 

 

8.25

 

 

 

16.85

 

 

 

8.10

 

Holders

On February 28, 2018, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE was $10.10 per share.

Holders

As of February 28, 2018,21, 2024, there were 27 stockholders of record of our common stock. Because many shares of our common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial stockholders represented by these record holders.

Dividend Policy

We have not declared any cash dividends for the past two years and we do not anticipate declaring or paying any regularpaid cash dividends on our common stock in all four quarters of 2023; $0.170 per share in the foreseeable future. Anyfirst quarter, $0.180 per share in the second quarter, $0.1825 per share in the third quarter, and $0.185 per share in the fourth quarter. The declaration and payment of cash dividends on our common stock in the future, whether at current levels or at all, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions, including under the Ryerson Credit Facility, and our outstanding notes, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.


27


Performance Graph

The following graph and accompanying table show the cumulative total return to stockholders of Ryerson Holding’s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 and a metals service center peer group (the “Peer Group”). The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in each of the indices (with reinvestment of dividends) from August 13, 2014December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2017. As2023. While there is no nationally-recognized industry index consisting of December 31, 2017 themetals service center companies, Ryerson considers its Peer Group consistedto consist of Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., Olympic Steel Inc., and OlympicWorthington Steel, Inc., each of which has securities listed for trading on the NASDAQ; and Russel Metals Inc., which has securities listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange. As of December 31, 2016 the Peer Group also included A.M. CastleExchange; and Klöckner & Co.Co SE., which has securities listed for trading on the OTCQB Venture Market and was removed from the 2017 peer group due to its Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization that was filed with the United States Bankruptcy court during 2017.XETRA Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The returns of each member of the Peer Group are weighted according to that member’s stock market capitalization. On December 1, 2023 Worthington Industries spun off their steel division into Worthington Steel, Inc. The chart below includes Worthington Industries data for December 31, 2018 through November 30, 2023 and Worthington Steel, Inc. data thereafter, with returns and market capitalization weighted for each respective period. The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Comparison of 41 Month5 Year Cumulative Total Return

Assumes Initial Investment of $100

December 2017

img213446697_4.jpg 

This graph is not deemed to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”), and should not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our prior or subsequent filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.

 

12/31/18

 

12/31/19

 

12/31/20

 

12/31/21

 

12/31/22

 

12/31/23

 

Ryerson Holding

$

100.00

 

$

192.67

 

$

222.15

 

$

427.04

 

$

504.40

 

$

588.08

 

S&P 500

$

100.00

 

$

132.78

 

$

156.34

 

$

199.56

 

$

164.85

 

$

205.25

 

Peer Group

$

100.00

 

$

152.67

 

$

166.30

 

$

217.74

 

$

258.47

 

$

359.06

 

 

8/13/14

 

9/30/14

 

12/31/14

 

3/31/15

 

6/30/15

 

9/30/15

 

12/31/15

 

3/31/16

 

6/30/16

 

9/30/16

 

12/31/16

 

3/31/17

 

6/30/17

 

9/30/17

 

12/31/17

 

Ryerson Holding

$

100

 

 

124.27

 

 

96.41

 

 

61.84

 

 

88.35

 

 

50.97

 

 

45.34

 

 

53.98

 

 

169.90

 

 

109.61

 

 

129.61

 

 

122.33

 

 

96.12

 

 

105.34

 

 

100.97

 

S&P 500

$

100

 

 

102.06

 

 

106.89

 

 

107.38

 

 

107.13

 

 

99.75

 

 

106.15

 

 

107.00

 

 

109.00

 

 

112.60

 

 

116.25

 

 

122.67

 

 

125.83

 

 

130.80

 

 

138.79

 

Peer Group- 2017

$

100

 

 

100.17

 

 

86.25

 

 

85.65

 

 

84.68

 

 

75.80

 

 

77.56

 

 

90.40

 

 

103.25

 

 

96.53

 

 

108.05

 

 

107.82

 

 

99.88

 

 

105.07

 

 

116.99

 

Peer Group- 2016

$

100

 

 

100.10

 

 

86.39

 

 

83.10

 

 

82.90

 

 

73.23

 

 

77.14

 

 

90.34

 

 

103.16

 

 

96.43

 

 

107.93

 

 

107.77

 

 

99.84

 

 

105.05

 

 

116.96

 

28


Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.On August 3, 2022, the Board of Directors authorized a new $75 million share repurchase program after the exhaustion of the previous share repurchase program. On May 1, 2023, the Board of Directors authorized an increase to $100.0 million and extended the program to April 2025. Under the program, management is not obligated to repurchase shares, but has discretion in determining the conditions under which shares may be purchased from time to time. We may opportunistically repurchase shares through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, and transactions structured through investment banking institutions under plans relying on Rule 10b5-1 or Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Repurchased shares are reverted to the status of Treasury Stock. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we repurchased 3,253,313 shares at an average cost of $35.00 per share, or $113.9 million in total. Following the increase in the share repurchase program to $100 million on May 1, 2023, we have repurchased $60.6 million in shares and $39.4 million remains outstanding as of December 31, 2023.


Our share repurchase activity during the three months ended December 31, 2023 was as follows:

Period

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

 

 

Average Price Paid per Share

 

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program

 

 

Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased under the Program

 

 

 

(In millions, except shares and per share data)

 

October 1, 2023 - October 31, 2023

 

 

100,329

 

 

$

27.96

 

 

 

100,329

 

 

$

42.9

 

November 1, 2023 - November 30, 2023

 

 

81,736

 

 

 

28.89

 

 

 

81,736

 

 

 

40.5

 

December 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023

 

 

37,549

 

 

 

30.49

 

 

 

37,549

 

 

 

39.4

 

 

 

 

219,614

 

 

 

 

 

 

219,614

 

 

 

 

Recent Sale of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

ITEM 6. RESERVED.

ITEM  6.

29


SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The following table sets forth our selected historical consolidated financial information. Our selected historical Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, and 2017 and the summary historical balance sheet data as of December 31, 2016 and 2017 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The selected historical Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 and the summary historical balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015 were derived from the audited financial statements and related notes thereto, which are not included in this Form 10-K.ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following consolidated financial information should be read together with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Ryerson Holding Corporation and the Notes thereto included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”  


FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA AND OPERATING RESULTS

(Dollars in millions, except per ton and per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

3,364.7

 

 

$

2,859.7

 

 

$

3,167.2

 

 

$

3,622.2

 

 

$

3,460.3

 

Cost of materials sold

 

 

2,782.2

 

 

 

2,289.1

 

 

 

2,599.5

 

 

 

3,028.4

 

 

 

2,843.7

 

Gross profit

 

 

582.5

 

 

 

570.6

 

 

 

567.7

 

 

 

593.8

 

 

 

616.6

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative (1)

 

 

472.5

 

 

 

436.4

 

 

 

450.8

 

 

 

509.2

 

 

 

480.1

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

 

Restructuring and other charges

 

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.9

 

Impairment charges on assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.0

 

Operating profit

 

 

110.0

 

 

 

133.2

 

 

 

108.6

 

 

 

86.4

 

 

 

124.6

 

Other income and (expense), net (2)

 

 

(2.3

)

 

 

(17.2

)

 

 

(10.4

)

 

 

(5.9

)

 

 

(0.2

)

Interest and other expense on debt (3)

 

 

(91.0

)

 

 

(89.9

)

 

 

(96.3

)

 

 

(107.4

)

 

 

(110.5

)

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

16.7

 

 

 

26.1

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

(26.9

)

 

 

13.9

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes (4)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(112.3

)

Net income (loss)

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

18.9

 

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

(26.2

)

 

 

126.2

 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(1.1

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation

 

$

17.1

 

 

$

18.7

 

 

$

(0.5

)

 

$

(25.7

)

 

$

127.3

 

Earnings (loss) per share of common stock: (5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share

 

$

0.46

 

 

$

0.55

 

 

$

(0.02

)

 

$

(1.01

)

 

$

5.99

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

0.46

 

 

$

0.54

 

 

$

(0.02

)

 

$

(1.01

)

 

$

5.99

 

Weighted average shares outstanding — Basic

 

 

37.2

 

 

 

34.3

 

 

 

32.1

 

 

 

25.4

 

 

 

21.3

 

Weighted average shares outstanding — Diluted

 

 

37.3

 

 

 

34.4

 

 

 

32.1

 

 

 

25.4

 

 

 

21.3

 

Balance Sheet Data (at period end):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

77.4

 

 

$

80.7

 

 

$

63.2

 

 

$

60.0

 

 

$

74.4

 

Restricted cash

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

1.8

 

Working capital

 

 

701.2

 

 

 

665.4

 

 

 

643.0

 

 

 

846.0

 

 

 

900.9

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net

 

 

422.9

 

 

 

388.2

 

 

 

400.3

 

 

 

428.2

 

 

 

444.1

 

Total assets

 

 

1,711.9

 

 

 

1,558.7

 

 

 

1,545.2

 

 

 

1,855.6

 

 

 

1,831.5

 

Long-term debt, including current maturities

 

 

1,045.7

 

 

 

963.5

 

 

 

1,023.5

 

 

 

1,242.1

 

 

 

1,269.5

 

Total equity (deficit)

 

 

(7.4

)

 

 

(49.3

)

 

 

(140.9

)

 

 

(124.5

)

 

 

(107.7

)

Other Financial Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operations

 

$

(2.1

)

 

$

24.9

 

 

$

258.9

 

 

$

(73.3

)

 

$

48.1

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

 

(71.7

)

 

 

(20.7

)

 

 

(18.0

)

 

 

(34.0

)

 

 

(13.5

)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

66.6

 

 

 

12.4

 

 

 

(232.0

)

 

 

100.5

 

 

 

(26.6

)

Capital expenditures

 

 

25.1

 

 

 

23.0

 

 

 

22.3

 

 

 

21.6

 

 

 

20.2

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

47.1

 

 

 

42.5

 

 

 

43.7

 

 

 

45.6

 

 

 

46.6

 

Volume and Per Ton Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tons shipped (000)

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

1,903

 

 

 

1,897

 

 

 

2,024

 

 

 

2,038

 

Average selling price per ton

 

$

1,682

 

 

$

1,503

 

 

$

1,670

 

 

$

1,790

 

 

$

1,698

 

Gross profit per ton

 

 

291

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

299

 

 

 

293

 

 

 

302

 

Operating expenses per ton

 

 

236

 

 

 

230

 

 

 

242

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

241

 

Operating profit per ton

 

 

55

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

61

 

(1)   The year ended December 31, 2014 includes $32.7 million of one-time IPO-related expenses.

(2)The year ended December 31, 2017 includes an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $0.2 million related to our investment in one available for sale security. The year ended December 31, 2016 includes an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $4.7 million related to our investment in one available-for-sale security and a $8.7 million loss on the retirement of debt related to the purchases and retirement of our 9.0% Senior Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”) and 11.25% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”). The year ended December 31, 2015 includes an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $12.3 million in the first quarter of 2015 related to our investment in one available-for-sale security and a $0.3 million gain on the retirement of debt related to the purchases of a portion of our 2017 Notes and 2018 Notes. The year ended December 31, 2014 includes $11.2 million of expense related to the premium paid to redeem $99.5 million of 2018 Notes.  Remaining amounts in each year are related to foreign currency gains (losses).

(3)The year ended December 31, 2015 includes a $2.9 million write off of debt issuance costs associated with our prior credit facility upon entering into a new revolving credit facility on July 24, 2015.

(4)The year ended December 31, 2013 includes a $124.2 million reduction in the valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets.

(5) On July 23, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a 4.25 for 1.00 stock split (the “Stock Split”) of the Company’s common stock effective August 5, 2014. The following amounts related to earnings per share and shares outstanding have been adjusted for the Stock Split for all periods reported.


ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Item 6. “Selected Financial Data” and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Ryerson Holding Corporation and Subsidiaries and the Notes thereto in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See the section entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those discussed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

OverviewThis section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2023 and 2022 items and year-over-year comparisons between 2023 and 2022. Discussions of 2021 items and year-over-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

BusinessOverview

Business

Ryerson Holding Corporation (“Ryerson Holding”), a Delaware corporation, is the parent company of Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (“JT Ryerson”), a Delaware corporation. Affiliates of Platinum Equity, LLC (“Platinum”) own approximately 21,037,5003,924,478 shares of our common stock, which is approximately 57%11.5% of our issued and outstanding common stock.

We are a leading value-added processor and distributor of industrial metals with operations in the United States ("U.S.") through JT Ryerson and other U.S. subsidiaries, in Canada through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Ryerson Canada”), and in Mexico through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Metals de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (“Ryerson Mexico”). In addition to our North American operations, we conduct materialsmetal processing and distribution operations in China through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Ryerson China Limited, a Chinese limited liability company (“Ryerson China”). Unless the context indicates otherwise, Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, Ryerson Canada, Ryerson China,Mexico, and Ryerson Mexico,China together with their subsidiaries, are collectively referred to herein as “Ryerson,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company.”

Industry and Operating Trends

We provideare a metals service center providing value-added processing and distribution of industrial metals with operations in the United States,U.S., Canada, Mexico, and China. We purchase large quantities of metal products from primary producers and sell these materials in smaller quantities to a wide variety of metals-consuming industries. More than 75%We carry a full line of approximately 75,000 products in stainless steel, aluminum, carbon steel, and alloy steels and a limited line of nickel and red metals in various shapes and forms. In addition to our metals products, we offer numerous value-added processing and fabrication services, and nearly 80% of the metals products soldwe sell are processed by us by bending, beveling, blanking, blasting, burning, cutting-to-length, drilling, embossing, flattening, forming, grinding, laser cutting, machining, notching, painting, perforating, polishing, punching, rolling, sawing, scribing, shearing, slitting, stamping, tapping, threading, welding, or other techniques to process materials to a specified thickness, length, width, shape, and surface quality pursuant to specific customer orders.

Similar to other metals service centers, we maintain substantial inventories of metals to accommodate the short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers. Accordingly, we purchase metals to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon customer forecasts, historic buying practices, supply agreements with customers, mill lead times, and market conditions. Our commitments to purchase metals are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders. At the request of our customers, we have entered into swaps in order to mitigate our customers’ risk of volatility in the price of metals and we have entered into metals hedges to mitigate our own risk of volatility in the price of metals. We have no long-term, fixed-price metals purchase contracts. When metals prices decline, customer demands for lower prices and our competitors’ responses to those demands could result in lower sale prices and, consequently, lower gross profits and earnings as we sell existing metals inventory. When metals prices increase, competitive conditions will influence how much of the price increase we may pass on to our customers.

The metals service center industry is cyclical and volatile in both demand and pricing, and difficult to predict. In 2017, we saw improved2023, Ryerson experienced a decline in average selling prices of 15.7% and a decline in shipments of 4.2% when compared to 2022 as the period was characterized by normalizing global supply and declining demand when viewed againstduring 2023, with higher inflation and high interest rates contributing to slower economic conditions for industrial manufacturing. Changes in average selling prices are primarily driven by commodity metals prices, which impact Ryerson’s selling prices over the subsequent three to six-month period.

30


Throughout 2023, indicators in the key steel industry end markets reported contraction in industrial activity. This is evidenced by the Institute for Supply Management’s Purchasing Managers’ Index (“PMI”), which reported contracting activity during the year ago period. with readings below the growth threshold of 50%, indicating a slowdown in factory activity. Similarly, U.S. Industrial Production, which reports year-over-year industrial sector business output, reported low or slowing growth in output for most of the year.

According to the Metal Service Center Institute, U.S.North American service center volumes have increased by four percent1.5% in 2023 compared to 2022. On a North American basis, Ryerson's North American volumes declined 4.8% over the same period. While most sectors experienced declines in volumes, Ryerson experienced demand growth in commercial ground transportation and oil & gas on a year-over-year basis.

2023 Performance

These key metrics illustrate Ryerson’s financial performance for the full year 2023 compared to 2022:

$5.1B

 

 

 

20.0%

 

 

 

$146M

 

Total Revenues

 

Gross Margin

 

Net Income Attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation

 

19% decrease

 

 

70bps decrease

 

 

$245M decrease

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$4.10

 

 

 

$4.08

 

 

 

$365M

 

Diluted EPS

 

Adjusted Diluted EPS

 

Cash from Operating Activities

 

$6.11 decrease

 

 

$6.46 decrease

 

 

$136M decrease

A reconciliation of diluted EPS to adjusted diluted EPS is provided below.

Lower commodity prices and slower economic conditions in metals markets in 2023 caused lower average selling prices and lower volumes. Compared to 2022, average selling prices decreased by 15.7% and tons shipped decreased by 4.2%, resulting in a year-over-year revenue decrease of 19.2%. Gross margin contracted by 70 bps from 2022 as decreasing market prices, and therefore selling prices, outpaced the decrease in inventory costs. Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses for 2023 increased by $58.3 million compared to 2022 driven primarily by inclusion of operating expenses from companies acquired in 2022 and 2023 and increased reorganization costs, primarily due to increased system conversion activity as well as start up costs associated with our new state of the art University Park location. We generated net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation of $145.7 million, or $4.10 per diluted share, in 2023. This compares to net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation of $391.0 million, or earnings of $10.21 per diluted share, for 2022. The year over year decreases are a result of the decline in commodity prices and slower economic conditions,

31


To provide greater insight into the Company’s 2023 operating trends apart from the year’s one-time transactions, Ryerson provides adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share figures, which are not U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial measures, to compliment the reported GAAP net income and diluted earnings per share figures. Management uses these metrics to assess year-over-year performance excluding non-recurring transactions. Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share do not represent, and should not be used as a substitute for, net income or earnings per share determined in accordance with GAAP. Illustrated in the below table, the 2023 net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation of $145.7 million includes a $0.8 million curtailment gain related to various retirement benefit plans. After adjusting for this non-core business transaction and the related income taxes, the adjusted net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation for 2023 is $145.1 million, a decrease of $258.5 million compared to the year-ago period.prior year’s adjusted net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation of $403.6 million which included $21.3 million of expenses related to the redemption of $300.0 million of the 8.50% senior secured notes due 2028 (the “2028 Notes”), a $3.8 million gain on the sale of assets, and a $0.6 million bargain purchase gain related to the acquisition of Ford Tool Steels, Inc., and related income taxes.

(Dollars and shares in millions, except per share data)

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation

 

$

145.7

 

 

$

391.0

 

Gain on bargain purchase

 

 

 

 

 

(0.6

)

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

(3.8

)

Loss on retirement of debt

 

 

 

 

 

21.3

 

Benefit plan curtailment gain

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(4.3

)

Adjusted net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation

 

$

145.1

 

 

$

403.6

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

4.10

 

 

$

10.21

 

Adjusted diluted earnings per share

 

$

4.08

 

 

$

10.54

 

Shares outstanding - diluted

 

 

35.6

 

 

 

38.3

 

Ryerson generated cash from operating activities of $365.1 million in 2023, a decrease compared to $501.2 million generated in 2022. The decrease in cash generation year over year is primarily due to lower net income generation. See further details within the the section titled "Liquidity and Capital Resources" within this Item.

Ryerson’s 2023 Strategy Achievements

Ryerson’s market strategy focuses on providing excellent customer experiences consistently with speed at scale. Our culture is based on our trademarked “say yes, figure it out” mantra as we strive to grow volume and sustainably expand margins by increasing our fabrication business, transactional sales and improving our speed through our use of both tools and analytics. Ryerson’s financial strategy includes a focus on generating cash from operating activities and continuously improving a “through the cycle” operating model in order to maintain a strong balance sheet, re-invest in the growth of the business, and generate returns to shareholders.

During the year, the Company invested in optimizing its service center network through organic growth investments as well as strategic acquisitions. In 2017, we experienced year-over-year growth2023, Ryerson’s newly constructed 214,000 square foot service center facility in shipment volumesCentralia, Washington became fully operational, which serves the Pacific Northwest market and features advanced processing capabilities for sheet, plate, and long products. Over the year, Ryerson also progressed with construction on a 900,000 square foot service center facility for its wholly-owned subsidiary, Central Steel & Wire Company, located in University Park, IL, which will feature expanded bar and tube processing capabilities and is expected to nearlybe operational by the second quarter of 2024.

In addition, Ryerson augmented its service center network through the acquisition of four companies, BLP Holdings, LLC ("BLP"), Norlen Incorporated ("Norlen"), TSA Processing ("TSA"), and Hudson Tool Steel Corporation ("Hudson"). These acquisitions bolster value-added processing capabilities in custom engineering and robotic manufacturing, broaden supply chain networks and service points, and diversify Ryerson’s transactional customer portfolio to secular end markets, which include HVAC, Agriculture, Oil & Gas, and Aerospace-related applications. Please refer to the section titled "Acquisitions" within this Item as well as Note 2 — “Acquisitions” of Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for further consolidated information on our 2023 acquisitions.

During 2023, the Company repurchased $113.9 million of its common stock including the repurchase of 2.9 million shares from its largest shareholder, Platinum Equity. Overall, Platinum Equity's sale of shares increased the share free float to 88.5% of shares outstanding, up from 57% as of December 31, 2022. As of May 1, 2023, $20 million of $75 million remained under the existing share repurchase authorization and the Board of Directors authorized increasing and extending the Company's share repurchase program by $80.0 million to $100.0 million expiring in April 2025. Throughout the year, Ryerson’s Board of Directors increased the quarterly cash dividend consecutively across all four quarters, and returned $24.8 million to shareholders in the form of dividends. In 2023, through share repurchases and dividends, Ryerson returned approximately $139 million to shareholders.

32


In December of 2023, Ryerson published its second Sustainability Report, which describes the Company’s commitment to making meaningful progress in five key focus areas: diversity, equity and inclusion, energy and emissions, talent and future workforce, circular economy, and data security. Additionally, the report highlights Ryerson’s scope 1 and 2 emissions, relative emissions comparisons to metals and distribution peers, commitment to employee safety and continued outperformance of industry average OSHA rates, as well as initiatives by the Company’s talent management office to develop its workforce.

In 2023, the Company progressed in its financial strategy. In adherence with a core pillar of our end markets, most notablyfinancial priorities announced at our investor day in construction equipment, HVAC, and oil and gas sectors.  We saw year-over-year shipment declines only2022, we maintained our leverage ratio within the target range between 0.5x to 2.0x throughout the year. In recognition of the Company’s substantial reduction in debt in 2022, achieved by retiring the consumer durable equipment sector.

Overall, commodity prices trended higherremaining $300 million of the 2028 Notes, Ryerson received a credit upgrade from Fitch in 2017. CRU hot-rolled carbon steel prices rose 7%, Midwest aluminum prices rose 20%February of 2023. Two of its covering agencies also gave the Company an upgrade in 2022. Moody’s upgraded Ryerson’s corporate rating to Ba3 from B1, Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) upgraded it to BB- from B+, and stainless 304 surcharge prices rose 32% duringFitch issued an upgrade to BB from BB-. The following table summarizes the year. Higher commodity prices translated into higher selling prices for Ryerson, with per ton pricing increases of almost 12% duringCompany’s current ratings by agency.

Agency

Corporate

Revolving Credit Facility

Outlook

Moody's

Ba3

Ba3

Stable

S&P

BB-

N/A

Stable

Fitch

BB

BBB-

Stable

Industry Developments

On February 24, 2023, the year. However, elevated import levels of carbon, stainless,US government announced trade actions targeting goods and entities from Russia, which included a proclamation to impose 200% ad valorem tariffs on Russian-origin aluminum products which rose approximately 12% in 2017 compared to 2016, and well supplied metals markets muted our ability to capture the full-effect of commodity price and demand improvements in our average selling price and margins. The muted pricing together with higher procured metal costs resulted in margin compression in 2017.


Recent Industry Developments

On March 1, 2018, President Trump announced a 25 percent tariff on all imported steelderivative products and 10 percent tariff on all importedother articles made from Russian primary aluminum products for an indefinite amount of timeor Russian aluminum castings. The duties will be imposed under Sectionsection 232 of the Trade Expansion Act ("Section 232") and cited by the White House due to (1) challenges faced by US aluminum producers in the face of high levels of aluminum imports and high energy prices; (2) recent increases in imports of aluminum from Russia, whose market is especially export-oriented, by 53 percent between March and July 2022; and (3) the fact that the Russian aluminum industry is a key part of Russia's defense industrial base. Ryerson has communicated to all vendors that we will not accept any Russian originating metal. The trade actions announced by the US government should support prices for Ryerson's product sales mix prices as the underlying domestic and North American supply-demand balance is protected from oversupply.

After the Russian forces invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the Biden administration issued executive orders prohibiting

the importation of goods from covered regions related to Ukraine and Russia. Ryerson takes this very seriously and has reviewed our

direct and indirect material purchases to ensure compliance. On April 8, 2022, President Biden signed into law the Suspending Normal

Trade Relations with Russia and Belarus Act, which denies "most-favored nation" tariff treatment to products of Russia and Belarus

and extends the President’s authority to impose sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act. If formally enacted, we expect these actionsBeginning

April 9, 2022, the Act imposes a 10.5% import duty on unalloyed primary aluminum and 11.0% on value-add aluminum products. The

import duties are not expected to have a upward biasmeaningful impact on pricing conditionsthe availability of aluminum for Ryerson. In 2023, the Company has

not purchased material from Russia or the named Ukrainian regions and has no open purchases orders issued to Russian suppliers as

of December 31, 2023.

Acquisitions

On March 1, 2023, JT Ryerson acquired BLP. Based out of Houston, Texas, BLP is comprised of three divisions: Absolute Metal Products, Metal Cutting Specialists, and Houston Water Jet, serving various industries such as oil & gas, aerospace, telecommunications, and structural fabrication. BLP provides complex fabrication services in addition to toll processing, including saw cutting, machining, and water jet cutting. The total amount paid by JT Ryerson for the acquisition amounted to $39.9 million.

On October 2, 2023, JT Ryerson acquired Norlen. Based out of Schofield, Wisconsin, Norlen is a full-service metal productsfabricator, providing stamping, machining, painting, and additional value-added fabrication services to industries including agriculture, HVAC, and defense. The total amount paid by JT Ryerson, net of cash acquired, for the acquisition amounted to $30.5 million.

On November 1, 2023, JT Ryerson acquired TSA. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, with five other locations across the Midwest and Southern United States, TSA is a stainless steel and aluminum coil and sheet processor. The total amount paid by JT Ryerson, net of cash acquired, for the acquisition amounted to $37.7 million.

33


On December 1, 2023, JT Ryerson acquired Hudson. Hudson is headquartered in Cerritos, California, with two facilities located in the U.S.Midwest and Northeast. Hudson is a supplier of tool steels and high-speed, carbon, and alloy steels. The total amount paid by JT Ryerson, net of cash acquired, for the acquisition amounted to $19.4 million.

AcquisitionsAdditionally, during the first six months of 2023, JT Ryerson completed the purchase of certain assets from ExOne Operating, LLC. The total amount paid by JT Ryerson for the acquired assets was $9.7 million.

On January 19, 2017, we acquired The Laserflex Corporation (“Laserflex”), a privately-owned metal fabricator with locations in Columbus, Ohio2023 acquisitions strengthen and Wellford, South Carolina. Laserflex specializes in laser fabrication metal processing and welding and further augmentsexpand JT Ryerson's valued-add services within our existing fabrication and metals processing capabilities.

On February 15, 2017, we acquired Guy Metals, Inc. (“Guy Metals”), a privately-owned metal service center company located in Hammond, Wisconsin. Guy Metals processes and polishesindustry-leading stainless and nickel alloy products including its trademarked “Pit Free Dairy”aluminum franchises as well as our tool steel capabilities which will allow us to increase our offerings to better serve our diverse customer base across our entire network. The 2023 acquisitions are not individually significant to the consolidated financial statements. Please refer to Note 2 — “Acquisitions” of Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and “Super4” finishes used in food, dairy, pharmaceutical, and beverage applications.  Consistent with the Laserflex acquisition, Guy Metals adds toSupplementary Data" for further consolidated information on our value-added processing capabilities to provide additional services to our customers.2023 acquisitions.

Components of Results of Operations

We generate substantially all of our revenue from sales of our metals products. RevenueThe majority of revenue is recognized upon delivery of product to customers. The timing of shipment is substantially the same as the timing of delivery to customers given the proximity of our distribution sites to our customers. Revenues associated with products which we believe have no alternative use, and where the Company has an enforceable right to payment, are recognized on an over-time basis. Over-time revenues are recorded in proportion with the progress made toward completing the performance obligation.

Sales, cost of materials sold, gross profit, and operating expense control are the principal factors that impact our profitability:

Net Sales. Our sales volume and pricing are driven by market demand, which is largely determined by overall industrial production and conditions in specific industries in which our customers operate. Sales prices are also primarily driven by market factors such as overall demand and availability of product. Our net sales include revenue from product sales, net of returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives.

Cost of materials sold. Cost of materials sold includes metal purchase and in-bound freight costs, third-party processing costs, and direct and indirect internal processing costs. The cost of materials sold fluctuates with our sales volume and our ability to purchase metals at competitive prices. Increases in sales volume generally enable us both to improve purchasing leverage with suppliers as we buy larger quantities of metals inventories, and to reduce operating expenses per ton sold.inventories.

Gross profit. Gross profit is the difference between net sales and the cost of materials sold. Our sales prices to our customers are subject to market competition. Achieving acceptable levels of gross profit is dependent on our acquiring metals at competitive prices, our ability to manage the impact of changing prices, and efficiently managing our internal and external processing costs.

Operating expenses. Optimizing business processes and asset utilization to lower fixed expenses such as employee, facility, and truck fleet costs, which cannot be rapidly reduced in times of declining volume, and maintaining low fixed cost structure in times of increasing sales volume, have a significant impact on our profitability. Operating expenses include costs related to warehousing and distributing our products as well as selling, general, and administrative expenses.


34


Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our condensed consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of income data:Operations data (certain percentages may not calculate due to rounding):

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2023

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

Net sales

 

$

5,108.7

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

6,323.6

 

 

 

100.0

%

Cost of materials sold

 

 

4,087.1

 

 

 

80.0

 

 

 

5,013.5

 

 

 

79.3

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,021.6

 

 

 

20.0

 

 

 

1,310.1

 

 

 

20.7

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and
   administrative expenses

 

 

793.5

 

 

 

15.5

 

 

 

735.2

 

 

 

11.6

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3.8

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Operating profit

 

 

228.1

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

578.7

 

 

 

9.2

 

Other expenses

 

 

(34.4

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(55.8

)

 

 

(0.9

)

Income before income taxes

 

 

193.7

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

522.9

 

 

 

8.3

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

47.3

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

131.4

 

 

 

2.1

 

Net income

 

 

146.4

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

391.5

 

 

 

6.2

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Ryerson
   Holding Corporation

 

$

145.7

 

 

 

2.9

%

 

$

391.0

 

 

 

6.2

%

Basic earnings per share

 

$

4.17

 

 

 

 

 

$

10.41

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

4.10

 

 

 

 

 

$

10.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

Net sales

 

$

3,364.7

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

2,859.7

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

3,167.2

 

 

 

100.0

%

Cost of materials sold

 

 

2,782.2

 

 

 

82.7

 

 

 

2,289.1

 

 

 

80.0

 

 

 

2,599.5

 

 

 

82.1

 

Gross profit

 

 

582.5

 

 

 

17.3

 

 

 

570.6

 

 

 

20.0

 

 

 

567.7

 

 

 

17.9

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and

   administrative expenses

 

 

472.5

 

 

 

14.0

 

 

 

436.4

 

 

 

15.3

 

 

 

450.8

 

 

 

14.3

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Restructuring and other charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

0.1

 

Impairment charges on assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

0.2

 

Operating profit

 

 

110.0

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

133.2

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

108.6

 

 

 

3.4

 

Other expenses

 

 

(93.3

)

 

 

(2.8

)

 

 

(107.1

)

 

 

(3.8

)

 

 

(106.7

)

 

 

(3.3

)

Income before income taxes

 

 

16.7

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

26.1

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

0.1

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

0.2

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

18.9

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Ryerson Holding

   Corporation

 

$

17.1

 

 

 

0.5

%

 

$

18.7

 

 

 

0.7

%

 

$

(0.5

)

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share

 

$

0.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.55

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(0.02

)

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

0.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.54

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(0.02

)

 

 

 

 

35


The following table showscharts show the Company’s percentage of sales by major product line:lines for 2023 and 2022:

img213446697_5.jpgimg213446697_6.jpg 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Product Line

 

(Percentage of Sales)

 

Carbon Steel Flat

 

 

28

%

 

 

28

%

 

 

25

%

Carbon Steel Plate

 

 

10

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

11

 

Carbon Steel Long

 

 

12

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

16

 

Stainless Steel Flat

 

 

18

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

16

 

Stainless Steel Plate

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Stainless Steel Long

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Aluminum Flat

 

 

15

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

Aluminum Plate

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Aluminum Long

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

4

 

Other

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Total

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%


Comparison of the year ended December 31, 20172023 with the year ended December 31, 20162022

Net Sales

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Dollar

 

 

Percentage

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Dollar

 

Percentage

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

 

($ in millions)

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Net sales

 

$

3,364.7

 

 

$

2,859.7

 

 

$

505.0

 

 

 

17.7

%

 

$

5,108.7

 

 

$

6,323.6

 

 

$

(1,214.9

)

 

 

(19.2

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Tons

 

 

Percentage

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Tons

 

Percentage

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Tons sold

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

1,903

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

5.1

%

 

 

1,943

 

 

 

2,029

 

 

 

(86

)

 

 

(4.2

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Price

 

 

Percentage

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Price

 

Percentage

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

Average selling price per ton sold

 

$

1,682

 

 

$

1,503

 

 

$

179

 

 

 

11.9

%

 

$

2,629

 

 

$

3,117

 

 

$

(488

)

 

 

(15.7

)%

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased2023, decreased from the same period a year ago due to higherlower average selling prices caused by lower commodity prices and higher tons sold. Average selling price increased in 2017 from the price levels in 2016 reflecting improvedto lower volume caused by slower economic conditions in metal markets in 2023. Commodity prices were at cyclical highs in 2021 and 2022 before beginning to decline in the metals market.  Averagesecond half of 2022. Compared to the year ago period, average selling price increaseddecreased for all of our product lines in the year ended December 31, 20172023 with the largest increasesdecreases in our carbon flat, stainless flat, and stainlesscarbon plate products. Tons sold increaseddecreased in 20172023 overall, with the largest increases in shipmentsdecreases in our stainless flat, aluminum long, and carbon long product lines partially offset by an increase in our stainless, aluminum, flat, and carbon plate product lines.shipments. Tons sold per ship day were 7,9687,741 in 2017 as2023 compared to 7,5528,084 in 2016.2022.

36


Cost of Materials Sold

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

($ in millions)

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Cost of materials sold

 

$

2,782.2

 

 

 

82.7

%

 

$

2,289.1

 

 

 

80.0

%

 

$

493.1

 

 

 

21.5

%

 

$

4,087.1

 

 

 

80.0

%

 

$

5,013.5

 

 

 

79.3

%

 

$

(926.4

)

 

 

(18.5

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Dollar

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Cost

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

Average cost of materials per ton sold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,391

 

 

$

1,203

 

 

$

188

 

 

 

15.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,103

 

 

$

2,471

 

 

$

(368

)

 

 

(14.9

)%

The increasedecrease in cost of materials sold in 20172023 compared to 2016 wasthe year ago period is primarily due to an increasea decrease in the average cost of materials sold per ton and the increase into lower tons sold. The average cost of materials sold decreased across all of our product lines with the average cost of materials sold for our carbon flat, carbon plate, and stainless flat product lines increaseddecreasing more than our other productsproduct lines during 2017, which2023.

During 2023, LIFO income was a faster increase than the increase in average selling price per ton for these products.  

During 2017, LIFO expense was $44$98 million related to increasesdecreases in pricing for all product lines.lines, with the largest impact from carbon products, slightly offset by the liquidation of older LIFO layers for stainless and aluminum products that were at a net higher cost. During 2016,2022, LIFO expenseincome was $7$58 million related to increasesa decrease in pricing for carbon products. In 2017, we recorded incomeproduct lines, partially offset by increases in pricing in stainless and aluminum products as well as the impact of $24 milliona reduction in carbon tons in inventory, which led to adjust the lowerliquidation of cost or market inventory reserveolder LIFO layers that were at a higher cost.

Gross Profit

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Gross profit

 

$

1,021.6

 

 

 

20.0

%

 

$

1,310.1

 

 

 

20.7

%

 

$

(288.5

)

 

 

(22.0

)%

Gross profit dollars decreased in 2023 compared to income of $14 million2022 as average selling price decreased faster than the decrease in 2016.

Gross Profit

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Gross profit

 

$

582.5

 

 

 

17.3

%

 

$

570.6

 

 

 

20.0

%

 

$

11.9

 

 

 

2.1

%


Gross profit increased in 2017 compared to 2016, but gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 17.3% in 2017 compared to 20.0% in 2016 as a competitive pricing environment combined with increasing commodity prices compressed gross profit margin. While our revenue per ton increased in 2017 as compared to 2016,the average cost of materials sold per ton increased at a faster pace, resulting in lowera decrease in gross margins.margin.

Operating Expenses

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

$

793.5

 

 

 

15.5

%

 

$

735.2

 

 

 

11.6

%

 

$

58.3

 

 

 

7.9

%

Gain on sale of assets

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

(3.8

)

 

 

(0.1

)%

 

$

3.8

 

 

 

(100.0

)%

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses increased $58.3 million in 2023 compared to 2022 with $28.4 million of the increase driven by including the expenses of companies acquired during 2022 and 2023. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, expenses changed in the following categories:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

$

472.5

 

 

 

14.0

%

 

$

436.4

 

 

 

15.3

%

 

$

36.1

 

 

 

8.3

%

Restructuring and other charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

(100.0

)

Operating expenses

higher reorganization costs of $28.7 million in 2017 were higher than in 20162023 primarily due to increased system conversion activity as well as start up costs associated with our new state of the following reasons:

Higher salaries and wages of $10.3 million resulting mainly from an increase in headcount after the acquisitions of Laserflex and Guy Metals in 2017,

art University Park location;

higher employee benefit costs of $8.0$8.3 million in 2017,2023, primarily due to higher medical expensescosts and higher net periodic benefit cost for pensions as our expected rate of return on plan assets decreased in 2017 vs. 2016,

stock compensation;

higher facilitysalaries and wage expense of $4.9 million in 2023 primarily due to compensation increases;

higher operating expenses of $8.0$4.3 million in 2023 primarily due to higher depreciation expenserepair & maintenance costs, higher information technology expenses, and higher operating supply costs,

insurance expense; and

higher deliveryselling, general, and administrative expenses of $7.8$1.3 million primarily due to the increase in tons sold in 2017,2023 resulting from higher travel and

entertainment expenses;

37


higher sales expenses of $2.4 million.

These changes were

partially offset by:

Lowerby lower incentive compensation expense of $3.2$21.2 million.

In 2022, we recorded a gain on sale of assets of $3.8 million from the sale of a facility in Texas that Ryerson had an option to purchase.

On a per ton basis, total operating expenses increased to $236$408 per ton in 20172023 from $230$360 per ton in 2016.2022.

Operating Profit

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Operating profit

 

$

110.0

 

 

 

3.3

%

 

$

133.2

 

 

 

4.7

%

 

$

(23.2

)

 

 

(17.4

)%

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Operating profit

 

$

228.1

 

 

 

4.5

%

 

$

578.7

 

 

 

9.2

%

 

$

(350.6

)

 

 

(60.6

)%

Our operating profit decreased in 20172023 compared to 20162022 primarily due to the decrease in average selling prices and gross marginprofit and the increase in operating expenses as a percent of sales discussed above.

Other Expenses

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net
Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

($ in millions)

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Interest and other expense on debt

 

$

(91.0

)

 

 

(2.7

)%

 

$

(89.9

)

 

 

(3.1

)%

 

$

(1.1

)

 

 

1.2

%

 

$

(34.7

)

 

 

(0.7

)%

 

$

(33.2

)

 

 

(0.5

)%

 

$

(1.5

)

 

 

4.5

%

Other income and (expense), net

 

 

(2.3

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(17.2

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

14.9

 

 

 

(86.6

)

 

$

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

$

(1.3

)

 

 

 

 

$

1.6

 

 

 

(123.1

)%

Loss on retirement of debt

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

(21.3

)

 

 

(0.4

)%

 

$

21.3

 

 

 

(100.0

)%


Interest and other expense on debt increased in 20172023 compared to 2016 as 2022 primarily due to higher interest rates on credit facility borrowings under our $1.3 billion revolving credit facility (“the interest rate onRyerson Credit Facility”) and a portionhigher level of borrowings outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility compared to the prior year. Partially offsetting this increase was the redemption and repurchase of $300.0 million principal amount of our 8.50% senior secured notes due 2028 (the “2028 Notes”) during 2022, bringing the outstanding Notes increased after we redeemedprincipal balance to zero in July 2022. Interest expense in 2022 included $2.6 million in charges to write-off unamortized bond issuance costs related to the $569.9 million outstanding balance of our 9.00% Senior Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”), repurchased $121.9 million and thereafter redeemed the remaining outstanding $48.5$300.0 million of our 11.25% Senior2028 Notes redeemed in 2022.

The other income and (expense), net in 2023 includes a $0.8 million gain on the curtailment of certain Central Steel & Wire ("CSW") pension and other post-employment benefit plans. The curtailment is due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”), and issued $650.0 million of new 11.00% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “2022 Notes”) in 2016, partially offset byto a reduction in future years of service resulting from workforce reductions at CSW as the amount of our outstanding NotesCSW headquarters is closing and lower amortization of debt issuance costs expense.operations are moving to a new facility in University Park, IL. The other expenseincome and (expense), net in 2017 was primarily related to2022 includes foreign currency losses. The other expense in 2016 was primarily related to a $8.7 million net loss on debt redemptions, a $4.7 million charge due to an other-than-temporary impairment recognized on an available-for-sale investment, and foreign currencytranslation losses of $3.9$1.3 million. In addition, the year 2022 includes losses of $21.3 million on the redemption and repurchase of $300.0 million of the 2028 Notes.

Provision for Income Taxes

The $1.3$47.3 million income tax benefitprovision in 2017 includes2023 and the $131.4 million tax expense on earningsprovision in 2022 primarily represent taxes at federal and local statutory rates where the U.S. and changes in our valuation allowances, adjusted for the impact of certain one-time items associated with the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) passed on December 22, 2017. These one-time adjustments included aCompany operates, but generally exclude any tax benefit for the revaluation of our deferred tax assets of $10.6 million and the tax associated with the deemed repatriation of foreign earnings of $7.2 million under the Act. The $7.2 million income tax expense in 2016 results predominantly from tax expense on earnings in the U.S. and the inability to benefit losses in our foreign subsidiaries due to valuation allowances.jurisdictions with historical losses.

Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, “Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” allows for reporting provisional amounts based on reasonable estimates for items for which accounting is incomplete.  The Company’s provision for income taxes in the current period includes $7.2 million of estimated tax expense related to the one-time deemed repatriation transition tax (“Transition Tax”).  Of the $7.2 million of estimated tax expense, $0.5 million is reflected in our deferred tax balances and $6.7 million is reflected in income taxes payable.  We have chosen to include an estimate of the Transition Tax due to the complex nature of the calculation and the short amount of time between passing of the legislation and the filing of our financial statements.

Noncontrolling Interest

In 2017,both 2023 and 2022, Ryerson China’s results of operations was income and the portion attributable to the noncontrolling interest was $0.9 million. In 2016, Ryerson China’s results of operations was income partially offset by a loss at our Brazil operations through Açofran Aços e Metais Ltda (“Açofran”) in which we had a 50% direct ownership percentage, until we substantially liquidated our investment in Acofran during 2016. The portion of Ryerson China’s$0.7 million and Açofran’s results attributable to the noncontrolling interest in 2016 was income of $0.2 million.  $0.5 million, respectively.

Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per share was $0.46$4.17 and $4.10, respectively, in 20172023. Basic and $0.55 in 2016. Diluteddiluted earnings per share was $0.46$10.41 and $10.21, respectively, in 2017 and $0.54 in 2016.2022. The changes in earnings per share are due to the results of operations discussed above as

38


well as an increase in the weighted averagehaving fewer shares outstanding in 2023 after the issuancerepurchase in 2023 of 5 million3,253,313 shares of common stock, including 2,882,720 shares from Platinum, in an underwritten public offering in July 2016.

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2016 with the year ended December 31, 2015

Net Sales

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Dollar

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Net sales

 

$

2,859.7

 

 

$

3,167.2

 

 

$

(307.5

)

 

 

(9.7

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Tons

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Tons sold

 

 

1,903

 

 

 

1,897

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

0.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Price

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

Average selling price per ton sold

 

$

1,503

 

 

$

1,670

 

 

$

(167

)

 

 

(10.0

)%

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased from 2015 due to lower average selling prices. Average selling price decreased in 2016 from the price levels in 2015 reflecting weaker economic conditions in the metals market. Average selling prices per ton decreased for all of our product lines in 2016 with the largest decrease in our stainless steel plate, stainless steel flat, and


stainless steel long product lines. Tons sold increased 0.3% in 2016 with increases in shipments of stainless steel plate and stainless steel flat product lines offset by decreases in shipments of our carbon steel plate and carbon steel long product lines. Tons sold per ship day were 7,552 in 2016 as compared to 7,528 in 2015.

Cost of Materials Sold

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Cost of materials sold

 

$

2,289.1

 

 

 

80.0

%

 

$

2,599.5

 

 

 

82.1

%

 

$

(310.4

)

 

 

(11.9

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Cost

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

change

 

 

change

 

Average cost of materials per ton sold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,203

 

 

$

1,371

 

 

$

(168

)

 

 

(12.3

)%

The decrease in cost of materials sold in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in the average cost of materials sold per ton. The average cost of materials sold for our stainless steel plate, stainless steel flat, and carbon steel plate product lines decreased more than our other products, in line with the change in average selling price per ton.

During 2016, LIFO expense was $7 million related to increases in pricing for carbon products During 2015, LIFO income was $97 million related to decreases in pricing for all product lines. As a result of falling average selling prices, LIFO income in 2015 was partially offset by a $38 million charge to record inventory at the lower of cost or market. In 2016, we recorded income of $14 million to adjust the lower of cost or market inventory reserve.

Gross Profit

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Gross profit

 

$

570.6

 

 

 

20.0

%

 

$

567.7

 

 

 

17.9

%

 

$

2.9

 

 

 

0.5

%

Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased to 20.0% in 2016 compared to 17.9% in 2015 due to, among other things, a decrease in cost of materials sold, as discussed above.

Operating Expenses

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

$

436.4

 

 

 

15.3

%

 

$

450.8

 

 

 

14.3

%

 

$

(14.4

)

 

 

(3.2

)%

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

(100.0

)

Restructuring and other charges

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

(60.0

)

Impairment charges on assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(7.7

)

 

 

(100.0

)


Operating expenses in 2016 were lower than in 2015 primarily dueaddition to the following reasons:

Lower employee benefit costsrepurchase of $11.0 million resulting mainly from a reduction in the net periodic benefit cost for pensions,

an impairment charge on assets of $7.7 million in 2015, primarily due to fixed asset impairments,

lower salaries and wages of $6.3 million due to lower employee headcount,

lower facility expenses, primarily taxes and repair and maintenance costs, of $6.2 million, and

lower administrative expenses, primarily due to lower outside technical services, of $3.0 million.

These changes were partially offset by:

Higher incentive compensation expense of $14.8 million.

On a per ton basis, operating expenses decreased to $230 per ton in 2016 from $242 per ton in 2015.

Operating Profit

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Operating profit

 

$

133.2

 

 

 

4.7

%

 

$

108.6

 

 

 

3.4

%

 

$

24.6

 

 

 

22.7

%

Our operating profit increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the increase in gross margin as a percent of sales discussed above.

Other Expenses

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

$

 

 

% of Net

Sales

 

 

Dollar change

 

 

Percentage change

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Interest and other expense on debt

 

$

(89.9

)

 

 

(3.1

)%

 

$

(96.3

)

 

 

(3.0

)%

 

$

6.4

 

 

 

(6.6

)%

Other income and (expense), net

 

 

(17.2

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(10.4

)

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(6.8

)

 

 

65.4

 

Interest and other expense on debt decreased primarily due to a lower principal amount of debt outstanding in 2016, partially offset by an increase in the interest rate on a portion of our outstanding Notes after we redeemed the $569.9 million outstanding balance of our 2017 Notes, redeemed the $170.4 million outstanding balance of our 2018 Notes, and issued $650.0 million of new 2022 Notes in 2016. The year 2015 also included a $2.9 million charge to write-off a portion of the issuance costs associated with the Company’s old revolving credit facility agreement upon entering into a new revolving credit facility agreement.  The year 2016 net other expense is primarily related to a $8.7 million net loss on debt redemptions, a $4.7 million charge due to an other-than-temporary impairment recognized on an available-for-sale investment, and foreign currency losses of $3.9 million. The year 2015 net other expense primarily related to a $12.3 million charge due to an other-than-temporary impairment recognized on an available-for-sale investment, partially offset by foreign currency gains of $1.5 million.

Provision for Income Taxes

The $7.2 million income tax expense in 2016 results predominantly from tax expense on earnings in the U.S. and the inability to benefit losses in our foreign subsidiaries due to valuation allowances. The $3.7 million income tax expense in 2015 results predominantly from tax expense on earnings in the U.S. and the inability to benefit losses in our foreign subsidiaries due to valuation allowances.  

Noncontrolling Interest

In 2016, Ryerson China’s results of operations was income partially offset by a loss at our Brazil operations through Açofran  in which we had a 50% direct ownership percentage, until we substantially liquidated our investment in Acofran during 2016. The portion of Ryerson China and Açofran’s results attributable to the noncontrolling interest in 2016 was income of $0.2 million.  In


2015, Ryerson China’s and Açofran’s results of operations was a loss. The portion of the income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in Ryerson China and Açofran was a loss of $1.3 million for 2015.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share was earnings of $0.55 in 2016 and a loss of $0.02 in 2015. Diluted earnings (loss) per share was earnings of $0.54 in 2016 and a loss of $0.02 in 2015. The changes in earnings (loss) per share are due to the results of operations discussed above as well as an increase of 2.2 million in average shares outstanding in 2016 compared to 2015 after the issuance of 5 million1,700,766 shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering in July 2016.during 2022.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, and borrowing availability under the $750 million revolving credit facility (the “RyersonRyerson Credit Facility”) that matures on November 16, 2021. ItsFacility. Our principal source of operating cash is from the sale of metals and other materials. ItsOur principal uses of cash are for payments associated with the procurement and processing of metals and other materials inventories, costs incurred for the warehousing and delivery of inventories, and the selling and administrative costs of the business, capital expenditures, and for interest payments on debt.

The following table summarizes the Company’s cash flows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

(2.1

)

 

$

24.9

 

 

$

258.9

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(71.7

)

 

 

(20.7

)

 

 

(18.0

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

66.6

 

 

 

12.4

 

 

 

(232.0

)

Effect of exchange rates on cash

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

(5.7

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

(3.3

)

 

$

17.5

 

 

$

3.2

 

The CompanyWe had cash and cash equivalents of $54.3 million at December 31, 2017 of $77.4 million,31,2023, compared to $80.7$39.2 million at December 31, 2016, and $63.2 million2022. Our total debt outstanding at December 31, 2015. The Company had $1,0462023 increased to $436.5 million $964 million, and $1,024compared to $367.0 million of total debt outstanding at December 31, 2022 due to acquisitions, capital expenditures, share repurchases and dividends paid, partially offset by income from operations in 2023. We had a debt-to-capitalization ratio of 101%, 105%,32% and 116%, and $264 million, $225 million, and $185 million available under the revolving credit facility29% at December 31, 2017, 2016,2023 and 2015,at December 31, 2022, respectively. The CompanyWe had total liquidity (defined as cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities,and availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility and foreign debt facilities) of $338 million, $301 million, and $273$656 million at December 31, 2017, 2016,2023 versus $909 million at December 31, 2022. Our net debt (defined as total debt less cash and 2015,cash equivalents) was $382 million and $328 million at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Total liquidity isand net debt are not a U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial measure.measures. We believe that total liquidity provides additional information for measuring our ability to fund our operations. Total liquidity does not represent, and should not be used as a substitute for, net income or cash flows from operations as determined in accordance with GAAP and total liquidity is not necessarily an indication of whether cash flow will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements. We believe that net debt provides a clearer perspective of the Company’s overall debt situation. Net debt should not be used as a substitute for total debt outstanding as determined in accordance with GAAP.

Below is a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents to total liquidity:

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2023

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

(In millions)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

77

 

 

$

81

 

 

$

63

 

 

$

54

 

 

$

39

 

 

$

51

 

Less: Qualified cash pledged as collateral

 

 

(28

)

 

 

(31

)

 

 

 

Marketable securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Availability under Ryerson Credit Facility and foreign debt facilities

 

 

289

 

 

 

251

 

 

 

208

 

 

 

602

 

 

 

870

 

 

 

690

 

Total liquidity

 

$

338

 

 

$

301

 

 

$

273

 

 

$

656

 

 

$

909

 

 

$

741

 

Below is a reconciliation of total debt to net debt:

 

 

December 31, 2023

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Total debt

 

$

436

 

 

$

367

 

 

$

639

 

Less: cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(54

)

 

 

(39

)

 

 

(51

)

Net debt

 

$

382

 

 

$

328

 

 

$

588

 

Of the total cash and cash equivalents, as of December 31, 2017, $682023, $34.2 million was held in subsidiaries outside the United States whichU.S. that is deemed to be permanently reinvested. Ryerson does not currently foresee a need to repatriate fundsearnings from its non-U.S. subsidiaries. Although the CompanyRyerson has historically satisfied needs for more capital in the U.S. through debt or equity issuances itand a significant portion of the earnings held in foreign jurisdictions is deemed to have been repatriated under the 2017 U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Ryerson could elect to repatriate funds held in foreign jurisdictionsadditional earnings, which could result in higher effective tax rates. The Company hasforeign withholding taxes and potential U.S. state income taxes. We have not recorded a deferred tax liability for the effect of a possible repatriation of these assetsearnings as management intends to permanently reinvest


these assetsearnings outside of the U.S. Specific plans for reinvestment include funding for future international acquisitions and funding of existing international operations.

39


The following table summarizes the Company’s cash flows:

Net

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Net income

 

$

146.4

 

 

$

391.5

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

62.5

 

 

 

59.0

 

Loss on retirement of debt

 

 

 

 

 

21.3

 

Change in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

 

67.9

 

 

 

126.7

 

Inventories

 

 

28.8

 

 

 

39.9

 

Accounts payable

 

 

24.8

 

 

 

(72.1

)

Accrued taxes payable/receivable

 

 

23.3

 

 

 

(52.9

)

Tenant improvement allowance

 

 

15.9

 

 

 

 

Other operating asset and liability balances

 

 

(22.5

)

 

 

(6.0

)

All other operating cash flows

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

(6.2

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

365.1

 

 

 

501.2

 

Acquisitions

 

 

(137.8

)

 

 

(57.0

)

Capital expenditures

 

 

(121.9

)

 

 

(105.1

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

8.0

 

Other investing activities

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

(5.9

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(262.1

)

 

 

(160.0

)

Repayment of debt

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

(321.3

)

Net proceeds from short-term borrowings

 

 

69.8

 

 

 

26.1

 

Net increase (decrease) in book overdrafts

 

 

(7.1

)

 

 

29.6

 

Dividends paid to shareholders

 

 

(24.8

)

 

 

(19.9

)

Share repurchases

 

 

(113.9

)

 

 

(50.0

)

All other financing cash flows

 

 

(10.6

)

 

 

(14.6

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(88.3

)

 

 

(350.1

)

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(3.0

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

14.9

 

 

$

(11.9

)

Operating activities. In 2023, average selling prices were 15.7% lower than in 2022 resulting in lower cash used in operating activities was $2.1 million in 2017 compared to net cash provided by operations of $24.9 million and $258.9 during 2016 and 2015, respectively. Net income (loss) was income of $18.0 million and $18.9 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively, and a loss of $1.8 million in 2015. Cash used in operating activities of $2.1 million duringgenerated from operations. Working capital fluctuates throughout the year ended December 31, 2017 wasbased on business needs. Working capital needs tend to be counter-cyclical, meaning that in periods of expansion the Company will use cash to fund working capital requirements, but in periods of contraction the Company will generate cash from reduced working capital requirements. Working capital requirements decreased in 2023 primarily due to an increasea decline in accounts receivableaverage selling prices and lower shipments in the fourth quarter of $44.0 million resulting from higher sales levels at year-end 20172023 compared to year-end 2016, an increasethe fourth quarter of 2022, which resulted in inventory of $42.9 million reflecting higher material costs in 2017, pension contributions of $21.7 million, an increase in deferred income taxes of $9.2 million,lower sales and the paymentrelated accounts receivable. Additionally, inventory costs decreased as market prices for metals decreased in 2023, resulting in a lower inventory investment. Material purchases were higher at the end of $7.9 millionthe fourth quarter of retiree medical costs, partially offset by2023 compared to the end of the fourth quarter of 2022 resulting in an increase in accounts payable in the fourth quarter of $58.3 million reflecting a higher cost of materials purchased at year-end 2017 compared to year-end 2016, non-cash depreciation and amortization expense of $47.1 million, and net income of $18.0 million. Cash provided by operating activities of $24.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to non-cash depreciation and amortization expense of $42.5 million, an increase in accounts payable of $20.5 million, and net income of $18.9 million, partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $22.5 million, pension contributions of $22.1 million, and premium and fees related to debt modification of $15.7 million. Cash provided by operating activities of $258.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in inventory of $178.1 million as we reduced inventory as metal prices weakened during the year.2023. In addition, accounts receivable declined $88.0 million reflecting lower2022, average selling prices were 15.1% higher than in 2021 resulting in significantly higher operating profits and tons soldhigher cash generated from operations. Working capital requirements in 2015, non-cash depreciation and amortization expense was $43.7 million, and we recorded a non-cash charge of $12.3 million2022 decreased due to an other-than-temporary impairment charge recognizedlower shipments and a decline in average selling prices in the fourth quarter of 2022, which resulted in lower sales and the related accounts receivable. Inventory quantities on an available-for-sale investment. Partially offsettinghand decreased to align with softer demand conditions. The lower inventory investment also decreased accounts payable balances. In 2022, we made estimated tax payments based on our forecasted income. Sales slowed in the fourth quarter of 2022, creating a tax overpayment, which was applied toward 2023 taxes due causing less cash inflows were pension contributions of $42.5 million and lower accrued liabilities of $20.0 million primarily due to a lower accrualpayments for incentive compensationtaxes in 2015.2023.

Net cash used inInvesting activities. The Company's main investing activities was $71.7 million, $20.7 million,are acquisitions, capital expenditures, and $18.0proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment. Capital expenditures increased year-over-year to $121.9 million in 2017, 2016,2023 compared to $105.1 million in 2022, as the Company continued its investment in a new facility in University Park, Illinois, a project which began in 2022 and 2015, respectively. Capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,expanded and 2015, were $25.1 million, $23.0 million, and $22.3 million, respectively. During 2017modernized its Shelbyville, Kentucky location in 2023. In 2023, the Company paid $49.2$127.5 million net of cash acquired, to acquire allBLP, TSA, Norlen, and Hudson, and paid $9.7 million to purchase certain assets from ExOne Operating, LLC. See Note 2: Acquisitions within Part II, Item 8 of this report, for further discussion of the issued and outstanding capital stock ofacquisitions. The Laserflex Corporation and Guy Metals, Inc. During 2015, the Company paid $7.7$57.0 million net of cash acquired,in 2022 to acquire all of the issuedApogee Steel Fabrication Incorporated, Ford Tool Steels, Inc., Howard Precision Metals, Inc., and outstanding capital stock of Southern Tool Steel, Inc. In 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company paid an additional $1.1 million annually in deferred consideration owed to the sellers of Fay Industries,Excelsior, Inc. The Company sold property, plant, and equipment and assets held for sale generating cash proceeds of $3.8$0.5 and $8.0 million $3.2in 2023 and 2022, respectively.

40


Financing activities. The Company's main source of liquidity to fund working capital requirements is borrowings on our credit facility. In 2023, acquisitions and capital expenditures, as well as share repurchases and dividends paid, were in excess of cash from operations, which increased borrowings on the Ryerson Credit Facility. In 2022, we repurchased, redeemed, and retired $300.0 million and $10.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

Net cash provided by financing activitiesprincipal of our 2028 Notes, which was $66.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.  In 2017, net cash provided by financing activities was primarily related to net proceeds of $74.3 million from credit facility borrowings and proceeds of $24.9 million from sale leaseback transactions, partially offset by a $18.0an increase of $49.0 million net decrease in bookCredit Facility borrowings. Book overdrafts and $14.4fluctuate based on the timing of payments. Cash dividends paid in 2023 were $24.8 million of principle payments under capital lease obligations. Net cash provided by financing activities was $12.4compared to $19.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. In 2016, net cash provided by financing activities was primarily relatedpaid to the issuance of the 2022 Notes with a principle amount of $650.0shareholders in 2022. We repurchased $113.9 million net proceeds of $71.5 million from the issuance of common stock during the 2023 compared to $50.0 of common stock repurchased in 2022.

In the normal course of business with customers, vendors, and net proceedsothers, we have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, such as letters of $37.0credit, which totaled $10.9 million from credit facility borrowings, partially offset by the redemptionas of the $569.9 million outstanding balance of the 2017 Notes and $170.4 million of the 2018 Notes. Net cash used in financing activities was $232.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. In 2015, net cash used in2023. We do not have any other material off-balance sheet financing activities was primarily relatedarrangements. Our off-balance sheet arrangements are not likely to the purchaseshave a material effect on our current or future financial condition, results of $30.1 million principal amount of the 2017 Notes repurchased for $29.4 million and the purchases of $30.1 million principal amount of the 2018 Notes repurchased for $30.5 million, and $164.4 million of repayments of credit facility borrowings with cash provided by operations, discussed above.liquidity, or capital resources.

Total Debt

Total debt at December 31, 20172023 increased $82.2$69.5 million to $1,045.7$436.5 million from $963.5$367.0 million at December 31, 2016 as a result of2022, mainly due to funding new acquisitions and capital expenditures during the year, funded by the Ryerson Credit Facility.in 2023.

Total debt outstanding as of December 31, 20172023 consisted of the following amounts: $384.2$433.0 million borrowingborrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility, $650.0 million under the 2022 Notes, $21.3$6.0 million of foreign debt, and $3.9$2.2 million of other debt, less 13.7$4.7 million of unamortized debt issuance costs. Availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility was $264$560 million and $225$826 million at December 31, 20172023 and December 31, 2016,2022, respectively. Discussion of our outstanding debt follows.For further information, see Note 9: Debt in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Ryerson Credit Facility

On November 16, 2016, Ryerson entered into an amendment with respect to the Ryerson Credit Facility to reduce the total facility size from $1.0 billion to $750 million, reduce the interest rate on outstanding borrowings by 25 basis points, reduce commitment fees on amounts not borrowed by 2.5 basis points, and to extend the maturity date to November 16, 2021.


At December 31, 2017, Ryerson had $384.2 million of outstanding borrowings, $12 million of letters of credit issued, and $264 million available under the Ryerson Credit Facility compared to $312.0 million of outstanding borrowings, $16 million of letters of credit issued, and $225 million available at December 31, 2016. Total credit availability is limited by the amount of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and qualified cash pledged as collateral under the agreement insofar as Ryerson is subject to a borrowing base comprised of the aggregate of these three amounts, less applicable reserves. Eligible accounts receivable, at any date of determination, is comprised of the aggregate value of all accounts directly created by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, a Canadian guarantor) in the ordinary course of business arising out of the sale of goods or the rendering of services, each of which has been invoiced, with such receivables adjusted to exclude various ineligible accounts, including, among other things, those to which a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable) does not have sole and absolute title and accounts arising out of a sale to an employee, officer, director, or affiliate of a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable). Eligible inventory, at any date of determination, is comprised of the net orderly liquidation value of all inventory owned by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, a Canadian guarantor). Qualified cash consists of cash in an eligible deposit account that is subject to customary restrictions and liens in favor of the lenders.

The Ryerson Credit Facility has an allocation of $660 million to the Company’s subsidiaries in the United States and an allocation of $90 million to Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower. Amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility bear interest at (i) a rate determined by reference to (A) the base rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America, N.A.’s prime rate and the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.00%), or (B) a LIBOR rate or, (ii) for Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower, (A) a rate determined by reference to the Canadian base rate (the greatest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “base rate” for commercial loans in U.S. Dollars made at its “base rate” and the 30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.00%), (B) the prime rate (the greater of Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “prime rate” for commercial loans made by it in Canada in Canadian Dollars and the one-month Canadian bankers’ acceptance rate plus 1.00%), or (C) the bankers’ acceptance rate. The spread over the base rate and prime rate is between 0.25% and 0.50% and the spread over the LIBOR for the bankers’ acceptances is between 1.25% and 1.50%, depending on the amount available to be borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility. Overdue amounts and all amounts owed during the existence of a default bear interest at 2% above the rate otherwise applicable thereto. Ryerson also pays commitment fees on amounts not borrowed at a rate of 0.23%.

We attempt to minimize interest rate risk exposure through the utilization of interest rate swaps, which are derivative financial instruments. During March 2017, we entered into an interest rate swap to fix interest on $150 million of our floating rate debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility at a rate of 1.658% through March 2020. The swap has reset dates and critical terms that match our existing debt and the anticipated critical terms of future debt. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility including the interest rate swap was 2.8 percent and 2.2 percent at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility are secured by first-priority liens on all of the inventory, accounts receivables, lockbox accounts, and related assets of the borrowers and the guarantors.

The Ryerson Credit Facility also contains covenants that, among other things, restrict Ryerson Holding and its restricted subsidiaries with respect to the incurrence of debt, the creation of liens, transactions with affiliates, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, and acquisitions. The Ryerson Credit Facility also requires that, if availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility declines to a certain level, Ryerson maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter, and includes defaults upon (among other things) the occurrence of a change of control of Ryerson and a cross-default to other financing arrangements.

The Ryerson Credit Facility contains events of default with respect to, among other things, default in the payment of principal when due or the payment of interest, fees, and other amounts due thereunder after a specified grace period, material misrepresentations, failure to perform certain specified covenants, certain bankruptcy events, the invalidity of certain security agreements or guarantees, material judgments, and the occurrence of a change of control of Ryerson. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility will be entitled to various remedies, including acceleration of amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility and all other actions permitted to be taken by secured creditors.  

The lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility could reject a borrowing request if any event, circumstance, or development has occurred that has had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. If Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, any of the other borrowers, or any restricted subsidiaries of JT Ryerson becomes insolvent or commences bankruptcy proceedings, all amounts borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility will become immediately due and payable.

Net proceeds of short-term borrowings that are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows represent borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility with original maturities less than three months.

2022 Notes

On May 24, 2016, JT Ryerson issued $650 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes (the “2022 Notes”). The 2022 Notes bear interest at a rate of 11.00% per annum. The 2022 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured


basis by all of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries that are co-borrowers or that have guarantee obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility.

The 2022 Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of JT Ryerson’s and each guarantor’s present and future assets located in the United States (other than receivables, inventory, cash, deposit accounts and related general intangibles, certain other assets, and proceeds thereof), subject to certain exceptions and customary permitted liens. The 2022 Notes and the related guarantees are also secured on a second-priority basis by a lien on the assets that secure JT Ryerson’s and the Company’s obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility. 

The 2022 Notes will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after May 15, 2019 at certain redemption prices. The redemption price for the 2022 Notes if redeemed during the twelve months beginning (i) May 15, 2019 is 105.50%, (ii) May 15, 2020 is 102.75%, and (iii) May 15, 2021 and thereafter is 100.00%. JT Ryerson may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes before May 15, 2019 at a redemption price of 100.00% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus a “make-whole” premium. In addition, JT Ryerson may redeem up to 35% of the 2022 Notes before May 15, 2019 with respect to the 2022 Notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a price equal to 111.00%, with respect to the 2022 Notes, of the principal amount thereof, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any. JT Ryerson may be required to make an offer to purchase the 2022 Notes upon the sale of assets or upon a change of control.

The 2022 Notes contain customary covenants that, among other things, limit, subject to certain exceptions, our ability, and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock, make investments, sell assets, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations, create liens, or use assets as security in other transactions. Subject to certain exceptions, JT Ryerson may only pay dividends to Ryerson Holding to the extent of 50% of future net income, once prior losses are offset.

The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2022 Notes, along with borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility, were used to (i) repurchase and/or redeem in full the $569.9 million balance of JT Ryerson’s 9.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”), plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon up to, but not including, the repayment date, (ii) repurchase $95.0 million of JT Ryerson’s 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”), and (iii) pay related fees, expenses and premiums.

The Company applied the provisions of ASC 470-50, “Modifications and Extinguishments” in accounting for the issuance of the 2022 Notes, redemption of the 2017 Notes, and partial repurchase of the 2018 Notes. The evaluation of the accounting under ASC 470-50 was performed on a creditor by creditor basis in order to determine if the terms of the debt were substantially different and, as a result, whether to apply modification or extinguishment accounting. For the lenders where it was determined that the terms of the debt were not substantially different, modification accounting was applied. For the remaining lenders, extinguishment accounting was applied. In connection with this debt modification and extinguishment, the Company recorded a $16.1 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during 2016, primarily attributed to the costs incurred with third parties for arrangement fees, legal, and other services related to the modified debt, as well as redemption fees paid to the creditors, and unamortized debt issuance costs written off related to the extinguished debt. Additionally, the costs incurred with third parties for arrangement fees, legal, and other services related to the extinguished debt and redemption fees paid to the creditors related to the modified debt were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the modified debt using the effective interest method.

During the year 2016, a principal amount of $75.4 million of the 2018 Notes were repurchased for $68.0 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of an $7.4 million gain within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Including the $16.1 million loss on the redemption of the $569.9 million balance of the 2017 Notes and repurchase of $95.0 million of the 2018 Notes, the Company recognized a total net loss of $8.7 million within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during year 2016.

During the year 2015, a principal amount of $30.1 million of the 2017 Notes were repurchased for $29.4 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a $0.7 million gain within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the year 2015, a principal amount of $30.1 million of the 2018 Notes were repurchased for $30.5 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a $0.4 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.


Foreign Debt

At December 31, 2017, Ryerson China’s total foreign borrowings were $21.3 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest rate of 3.7% per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment. At December 31, 2016, Ryerson China’s total foreign borrowings were $19.2 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest rate of 4.4% per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment.

Availability under the Ryerson China’s credit facility was $25 million and $26 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Letters of credit issued by our foreign subsidiaries totaled $3 million and $6 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Pension Funding

The Company made contributions of $21.7$8.8 million in 2017, $22.12023, $6.8 million in 2016,2022, and $42.5$23.7 million in 20152021 to improve the Company’s pension plans funded status. At December 31, 2017,2023, as reflected in Part II. Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 10, to the Consolidated Financial Statements, pension liabilities exceeded plan assets by $165$63.9 million. The Company anticipates that it will have a minimum required pension contribution of approximately $28$11.0 million in 20182024 under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), Pension Protection Act in the U.S., and the Ontario Pension Benefits Act in Canada. The expected future contributions reflect pension funding relief measures under the American Rescue Plan Act (“ARPA”) passed in March 2021. Future contribution requirements depend on the investment returns on plan assets, the impact of discount rates on pension liabilities, and changes in regulatory requirements. The Company is unable to determine the amount or timing of any such contributions required by ERISA or whether any such contributions would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or cash flows. The Company believes

Changes in returns on plan assets may affect our plan funding, cash flows, and financial condition. Differences between actual plan asset returns and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets impact the measurement of the following year’s pension expense and pension funding requirements. However, we believe that cash flow from operations and the Ryerson Credit Facility described above will provide sufficient funds to make the minimum required contribution in 2018.contributions.

Income Tax Payments

The Company made income tax payments of $1.7 million, $1.8 million, and $3.2$6.2 million in 2017, 2016,2023, $176.9 million in 2022, and 2015, respectively.$70.2 million in 2021. Income tax payments in 2023 decreased due to lower pre-tax income year over year in addition to prior year tax over payments being applied toward 2023 taxes due. See Part II. Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 18: Income Taxes for further discussion.

Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsMaterial Cash Requirements

InThe Company expects to make approximately $441 million in principal payments to satisfy its debt obligations, consisting of $6 million in foreign debt coming due in 2024, $2 million of other debt coming due in 2024, and $433 million for the normal courseRyerson Credit Facility coming due in 2027. Please refer to Part II. Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 9: Debt for further information.

The Company expects to pay approximately $29 million of businessinterest on the Ryerson Credit Facility, foreign debt, and other debt over the next 12 months and $72 million thereafter. Interest payments related to the variable rate debt were estimated using the weighted average interest rate for the respective debt instrument.

41


The Company leases various assets including real estate, trucks, trailers, cars, mobile equipment, processing equipment, and IT equipment. We have noncancelable operating leases expiring at various times through 2043, and finance leases expiring at various times through 2030. The total amount of future lease payments is estimated to be $485 million with customers, vendors,$48 million for the next 12 months. Please refer to Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and others, we haveSupplementary Data, Note 6: Leases for further information.

Purchase obligations with suppliers are entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, such as letterswhen we receive firm sales commitments with certain of credit, which totaled $15 million asour customers. As of December 31, 2017. Additionally, other than normal course long-term operating leases included2023, we had outstanding purchase obligations of approximately $20 million expiring in the following Contractual Obligations table, we do not have any material off-balance sheet financing arrangements. None of these off-balance sheet arrangements are likely to have a material effect on our current or future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources.  


Contractual Obligations2024.

The following table presents contractual obligations at December 31, 2017:

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Less than

1 year

 

 

1 – 3

years

 

 

4 – 5

years

 

 

After

5

years

 

Contractual Obligations(1)(2)

 

(In millions)

 

2022 Notes

 

$

650

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

650

 

 

$

 

Ryerson Credit Facility

 

 

384

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

384

 

 

 

 

Foreign Debt

 

 

21

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Debt

 

 

4

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on 2022 Notes, Foreign Debt, Other Debt, and Ryerson Credit Facility(3)

 

 

355

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

 

Purchase Obligations(4)

 

 

32

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Leases

 

 

90

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

15

 

Pension Withdrawal Liability

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Capital Leases

 

 

37

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

Transition Tax Liability

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

5

 

Total

 

$

1,581

 

 

$

170

 

 

$

221

 

 

$

1,169

 

 

$

21

 

(1)

The contractual obligations disclosed above do not include our potential future pension funding obligations (see previous discussion under “Pension Funding” caption).

(2)

Due to uncertainty regarding the completion of tax audits and possible outcomes, we do not know the timing of when our obligations related to unrecognized tax benefits will occur, if at all. See Note 17 “Income Taxes” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

(3)

Interest payments related to the variable rate debt were estimated using the weighted average interest rate for the Ryerson Credit Facility.

(4)

The purchase obligations with suppliers are entered into when we receive firm sales commitments with certain of our customers.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures during 2017, 2016, and 2015 totaled $25.1 million, $23.0 million, and $22.3 million, respectively. Capital expenditures were primarily for machinery and equipment.

The Company anticipates capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, to be approximately $25 million in 2018. The spending includes maintenance expenditures and improvements to maintain, upgrade, and add to the Company’s North American processing capabilities.

Restructuring

2017

In 2017, the Company recorded an $0.8 million charge in warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations to increase the reserve for tenancy-related costs for a facility closed in 2013. The Company paid $0.4 million in costs related to this facility closure and also reclassified an existing $0.1 million liability for future lease payments to the restructuring reserve. In addition, the Company paid $0.1 million in costs related to a facility closed in 2016. The remaining $1.7 million of tenancy-related costs are expected to be paid through 2025.

During 2017, the Company recorded a $0.2 million reduction to the reserve for employee-related costs and credited warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. This action fully utilized the remaining reserve for employee-related costs.  

2016

In 2016, the Company recorded a charge of $1.0 million related to a facility closure, which consists of tenancy-related costs, primarily future lease payments. The Company paid $0.2 million in costs related to this facility closure and also reclassified an existing $0.2 million liability for future lease payments at this facility to the restructuring reserve. The Company also paid $0.3 million in costs related to a facility closed in 2013 and recorded an addition of $0.1 million to the reserve for tenancy-related costs, which was charged to warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


During 2016, the Company paid $0.7 million in employee-related costs related to restructuring actions taken in the fourth quarter of 2015. The Company also recorded a $0.3 million reduction to the reserve for employee-related costs and credited warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

2015

In 2015, the Company recorded a charge of $2.2 million for employee costs related to expense reduction actions taken in the fourth quarter of 2015. The charge consists primarily of severance costs for 140 employees in addition to $0.2 million of non-cash pensions and other post-retirement benefit costs. During 2015, the Company paid $0.8 million in costs related to this expense reduction initiative.

In 2015, the Company also recorded a $0.3 million charge to increase the reserve for tenancy-related costs for a facility closed in 2013. During 2015, the Company paid $0.4 million in tenancy costs related to this facility.

Deferred Tax Amounts

At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had a net deferred tax assetliability of $18$136 million comprised primarily of a deferred tax asset of $46$17 million related to pension liabilities, a deferred tax asset related to postretirement benefits other than pensions of $15$9 million, $30 million of Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards, and deferred tax assets of $78$7 million related to federal,state, local, and foreign tax loss carryforwards, $93 million related to operating lease liabilities, and $22 million of other deferred taxes relating to accrued compensation and other items, offset by a valuation allowance of $24$4 million and deferred tax liabilities of $53$86 million related to fixed assets, and $92$99 million related to inventory.

The Company’s deferred tax assets include $53inventory, $88 million related to U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, $19lease assets, and $7 million related to state NOL carryforwards, and $6 million related to foreign NOL carryforwards, available at December 31, 2017.

The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”), enacted on December 22, 2017, significantly changes U.S. corporateintangibles. We may experience fluctuations in our forecasted earnings before income tax laws by, among other things, reducing the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 21% starting in 2018 and creating a territorial tax system with a one-time mandatory tax on previously deferred foreign earnings of U.S. subsidiaries. Under ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” the effects of changes in tax rates and laws on deferred tax balances are recognized in the period in which the new legislation is enacted.  Astaxes as a result of the Act, we have recorded a benefit for the revaluation ofevents which cannot be predicted, which could affect our deferred tax assets of $10.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2017 within the provision (benefit) for income taxes line of the Consolidated Statement of Operations.balances.

In accordance with ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes,” the Company assesses the realizability of its deferred tax assets. The Company records a valuation allowance when, based upon the evaluation of all available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making this determination, we analyze, among other things, our recent history of earnings, the nature and timing of reversing book-tax temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and future income. After considering both the positive and negative evidence available, in the second quarter of 2009, the Company determined that it was more-likely-than-not that it would not realize a portion of its U.S. deferred tax assets. As a result, the Company established a valuation allowance against a portion of its U.S. deferred tax assets. The Company released a portion of the valuation allowance related to one of its U.S. subsidiaries, JT Ryerson, during 2012. The Company released most of the remaining U.S. related valuation allowance during 2013. As of December 31, 2016,2021, the Company had a valuation allowance of $20.0 million. As$5.0 million, a decrease of December 31, 2017, the Company had a valuation allowance of $24.4 million, an increase of $4.4$1.6 million from the prior year mainly related to changes in foreigna release of a valuation allowance on state NOL deferred tax assets, which we now expect to realize due to improved profitability. The valuation allowance did not change during 2022, remaining at $5.0 million as of December 31, 2022 related to U.S. federal tax credit deferred tax assets and U.S. foreign tax credits.assets. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had a valuation allowance of $4.0 million, a decrease of $1.0 million from the prior year mainly related to an adjustment to certain U.S. federal tax credits and deferred tax assets which were fully reserved. As of December 31, 2023, the valuation allowance continues to be related to U.S. federal tax credit deferred tax assets and foreign tax assets.

As described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company assesses the need for a valuation allowance considering all available positive and negative evidence, including past operating results, projections of future taxable income, and the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies. The fourth quarter of 2013 was the first quarter in which the Company’s overall U.S. operations had sustained an operating profit in both the preceding cumulative three fiscal year period and in each of its two preceding fiscal years, providing objective evidence of the Company’s ability to earn future profits. Combined with the Company’s projections of future income providing additional subjective evidence of the Company’s ability to earn future profits and management’s judgment, the Company determined that these deferred tax assets were more likely than not realizable and accordingly the valuation allowance was no longer required.  

The Company will continue to maintain a valuation allowance on certain U.S. federal and stateforeign deferred tax assets until such time as in management’s judgment, considering all available positive and negative evidence, the Company determines that these deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable.


Critical Accounting Estimates

Preparation of this Form 10-K requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period. Our critical accounting policies, including the assumptions and judgments underlying them, are disclosed in Item 8 within Note 1: “SummarySummary of Accounting and Financial Policies”.Policies. These policies have been consistently applied and address such matters as revenue recognition, depreciation methods, inventory valuation, asset impairment recognition, and pension and postretirement expense. While policies associated with estimates and judgments may be affected by different assumptions or conditions, we believe our estimates and judgments associated with the reported amounts are appropriate in the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

We consider the policies discussed below as critical to an understanding of our financial statements, as application of these policies places the most significant demands on management’s judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimation of matters that are uncertain.

Provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts: We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and set credit limits based upon review of the customers’ current credit information, payment history, and payment history.the current economic and industry environments. We monitor customer payments and maintain a provision for estimated credit losses based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues that we have identified. Estimation of such losses requires adjusting historical loss experience for current economic conditions and judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers. We cannot guarantee that the rate of future credit losses will be similar to past experience. Provisions for allowances and claims are based upon

42


historical rates, expected trends, and estimates of potential returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives. We consider all available information when assessing the adequacy of the provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts.

Inventory valuation: Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The valuation of our inventories at the lower of cost or market could be subject to certain estimates; however, the measurement is primarily based on historical purchasing and sales information rather than forecasted metals pricing. Inventory costs reflect metal and in-bound freight purchase costs, third-party processing costs, and internal direct and allocated indirect processing costs. Cost is primarily determined by the LIFO method. We regularly review inventory on hand and record provisions for obsolete and slow-moving inventory based on historical and current sales trends. Changes in product demand and our customer base may affect the value of inventory on hand which may require higher provisions for obsolete inventory.

Income Taxes: Our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and reserve for uncertain tax positions reflect our best estimate of taxes to be paid. The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and several foreign jurisdictions. The determination of the consolidated income tax expense requires judgment and estimation by management. It is possible that actual results could differ from the estimates that management has used to determine its consolidated income tax expense.

We record operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and the estimated effect of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. We follow detailed guidelines in each tax jurisdiction when reviewing tax assets recorded on the balance sheet and provide for valuation allowances as required. Deferred tax assets are reviewed for recoverability based on historical taxable income, the expected reversals of existing temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and on forecasts of future taxable income. The forecasts of future taxable income require assumptions regarding volume, selling prices, margins, expense levels, and industry cyclicality. If we are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions, we may be required to record additional valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets related to those jurisdictions.

The Company’s income tax provisions are based on calculations and assumptions that are subject to examination by the IRSInternal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. Although the Company believes that the positions taken on filed tax returns are reasonable, it has established tax and interest reserves in recognition that various taxing authorities may challenge the positions taken. For uncertain tax positions, the Company applies the provisions of relevant authoritative guidance, which requires application of a “more likely than not” threshold to the recognition and derecognition of tax positions. The Company’s ongoing assessments of the more likely than not outcomes of tax authority examinations and related tax positions require significant judgment and can increase or decrease the Company’s effective tax rate.

Long-lived Assets and Other Intangible Assets: Long-lived assets held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment is recognized. Determining whether an impairment has occurred typically requires various estimates and assumptions, including determining which undiscounted cash flows


are directly related to the potentially impaired asset, the useful life over which cash flows will occur, their amount, and the asset’s residual value, if any. Any related impairment loss is calculated based upon comparison of the fair value to the carrying value of the asset. Separate intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives. An impaired long-lived or intangible asset would be written down to fair value, based on various available valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flow method.

Goodwill: We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of recorded goodwill annually in the fourth quarter of each year or whenever indicators of potential impairment exist. We test for impairment of goodwill by assessing various qualitative factors with respect to developments in our business and the overall economy and calculating the fair value of a reporting unit using the discounted cash flow method, as necessary.economy. Factors that may be considered indicators of impairment include: deterioration in general economic conditions; declines in the market conditions of our products, including metals prices; a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization; reduced future cash flow estimates; and slower growth rates in our industry, among others. If we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value based on our qualitative assessment, we will proceed to the goodwill impairment test. We compare the fair value of the reporting unit in which goodwill resides to its carrying value. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unitsunit is estimated using a combination of an income approach and a market approach as this combination is deemed to be the most indicative of our fair value in an orderly transaction between market participants. An income approach based on discounted future cash flows requires us to estimate income from operations based on projected results and discount rates based on a weighted average cost of capital of comparable companies. A market approach estimates fair value using market multiples of various financial measures of comparable public companies. If these estimates or their related assumptions for commodity prices and demand change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets.

43


Based on the impairment test performed as ofon October 1, 2015, the reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying value by more than 25%. Based on a qualitative assessment performed as of October 1, 2017,2023, the Company concluded it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than itsunits tested for impairment exceeded the carrying amount. Therefore, we did not perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test during 2017.value. The discount rate for the reporting unit was estimated to be 14.5%13.5% at October 1, 2017.2023. The Company determines a discount rate based on an estimate of a reasonable risk-adjusted return an investor would expect to realize on an investment in the reporting unit. Deterioration in market conditions in our industry or products, changes in expected future cash flows, expected growth rates, or to discount rates could result in impairment charges in future periods.

Purchase Price Accounting: Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. This method requires the Company to record assets and liabilities of the business acquired at their estimated fair market values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Any shortfall in the cost of the acquisition compared to the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a bargain purchase gain. The Company uses valuation specialists, where necessary, to perform appraisals and assist in the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These valuations require management to make estimates and assumptions that are critical in determining the fair values of the assets and liabilities.

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed that do not constitute a business are accounted for using the cost accumulation and allocation model under which the cost of the acquisition is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

Pension and postretirement benefit plan assumptions: We sponsor various benefit plans covering a portion of our employees for pension and postretirement medical costs. Statistical methods are used to anticipate future events when calculating expenses and liabilities related to the plans. The statistical methods include assumptions about, among other things, the discount rate, expected return on plan assets, rate of increase of health care costs, and the rate of future compensation increases. Our actuarial consultants also use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates when estimating expenses and liabilities. The discount rate used for U.S. plans reflects the market rate for high-quality fixed-income investments on our annual measurement date (December 31) and is subject to change each year. The discount rate wasis determined by matching, on an approximate basis, the coupons and maturities for a portfolio of corporate bonds (rated Aa or better by Moody’s Investor Services or AA or better by Standard and Poor’s) to the expected plan benefit payments defined by the projected benefit obligation. The discount rates used for plans outside the U.S. are based on the yield of long term high quality corporate bonds, the duration of the liability, and appropriate judgment.

When calculating pension expense for 2017,2023, we assumed the pension plans’ assets would generate a long-term rate of return of between 6.75% and 6.95%6.05% for the U.S.JT Ryerson plan and 3.80% for the Central Steel and Wire Company plan, and between 5.25%4.25% and 5.50%6.00% for the Canadian plans. The expected long-term rate of return assumption was developed based on historical experience and input from the trustee managing the plans’ assets. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on a target allocation of assets, which is based on a goal of earning the highest rate of return while maintaining risk at acceptable levels. Our projected long-term rate of return for the U.S. pension plan is slightly higher than some market indices due to the active management of our plans’ assets, and is supported by the historical returns on our plans’ assets. The plans strive to have assets sufficiently diversified so that adverse or unexpected results from one security class will not have an unduly detrimental impact on the entire portfolio. We regularly review actual asset allocation and the pension plans’ investments are periodically rebalanced to the targeted allocation when considered appropriate. Pension expense increases as the


expected rate of return on plan assets decreases. Lowering the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets by 50 basis points would have increased 20172023 pension expense by approximately $3$1 million.

Future pension obligations for the U.S. plans were discounted using a raterates between of 3.64%5.05% and 5.24% at December 31, 2017.2023. Future pension obligations for the Canadian plans were discounted using weighted average rates between 3.31% and 3.32%4.64% at December 31, 2017.2023. Lowering the discount rate by 50 basis points would increase the pension liability at December 31, 20172023 by approximately $45$15 million.

The calculation of other postretirement benefit expense and obligations requires the use of a number of assumptions, including the assumed discount rate between 4.63% and 5.06% at December 31, 2023 for measuring future payment obligations and the health care cost trend rate. A one percentage point increase (decrease) in assumed health care trend rates would increase (decrease) our total service and interest cost for the year ended December 31, 2017 by $0.1 million and $(0.1) million, respectively.obligations. A decrease in the weighted average discount rate of 50 basis points would increase the postretirement benefit liability by approximately $3$2 million.

The assumptions used in the actuarial calculation of expenses and liabilities may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates, or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact on the amount of pension or postretirement benefit expense we may record in the future.

Legal contingencies: We are involved in a number of legal and regulatory matters including those discussed in Item 8 within Note 11 in the Consolidated Financial Statements.12: Commitments and Contingencies. We determine whether an estimated loss from a loss contingency should be accrued by assessing whether a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated. We analyze our legal matters based on available information to assess potential liability. We consult with outside counsel involved in our legal matters when analyzing potential outcomes. We cannot determine at this time whether any potential liability related to this litigation would materially affect our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

44


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are discussed within Note 11: Summary of Accounting and Financial Policies in the ConsolidatedPart II, Item 8 Financial Statements.Statements and Supplementary Data.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Our primary areas of market risk include changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices. We continually monitor these risks and develop strategies to manage them.

Interest rate risk

Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates. We are exposed to market risk related to our fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt. Changes in interest rates may affect the marketAs of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we have no publicly traded debt. The carrying value of our fixed-rate debt. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt was $436.5 million and the current portions thereof using quoted market prices of Company debt securities recently traded and market-based prices of similar securities for those securities not recently traded was $1,125.9$367.0 million at December 31, 20172023 and $1,034.2 million at December 31, 2016 as compared with the2022, respectively. The carrying value approximates our fair value due to the short-term nature of $1,045.7 million and $963.5 million atthe underlying borrowings on the Ryerson Credit Facility.

We may use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to interest rate changes. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2023, we have no outstanding interest rate swaps.

Approximately 1% of our debt is at fixed interest rates as of December 31, 2023. A hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates on variable rate debt would have increased interest expense in 2017for the twelve months of 2023 by approximately $2.7$4.7 million.

Foreign exchange rate risk

We are subject to exposure from fluctuationsforeign currency risks primarily through our operations in foreign currencies. WeCanada, Mexico, and China and we use foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge variability in cash flows when a paymentreduce our exposure to currency is different from our functional currency.price fluctuations. Foreign currency contracts are principally used to purchase U.S. dollars. We had foreign currency contracts with a U.S. dollar notional amount of $5.1$1.6 million outstanding at December 31, 20172023 and a net assetfair value of $0.1 million.zero. We do not currently account for these contracts as hedges but rather mark these contracts to market with a corresponding offset to current earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, the Company recognized zero gainsgain or lossesloss associated with its foreign currency contracts. A hypothetical strengthening or weakening of 10% in the foreign exchange rates underlying the foreign currency contracts from the market rate as of December 31, 20172023 would increase or decrease the fair value of the foreign currency contracts by $0.6$0.1 million. and $0.2 million, respectively.

The currency effects of translating the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss and will not be recognized in the statement of operations until there is a liquidation or sale of those foreign subsidiaries.


Commodity price risk

In general, we purchase metals in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon historic buying practices, customer contracts, and market conditions. Our commitments to purchase metals are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders.

Metal prices can fluctuate significantly due to several factors including changes in foreign and domestic production capacity, raw material availability, metals consumption, and foreign currency rates. Declining metal prices could reduce our revenues, gross profit, and net income. From timeDerivative financial instruments have been used to time, we may enter into fixed price sales contracts with our customers for certainmanage a limited portion of our inventory components. We may enter into metal commodity futures and options contractsexposure to reduce volatilityfluctuations in the pricecost of these metals.certain commodities. No derivatives are held for trading purposes.

As of December 31, 2017,2023, we had 453 tons of nickel swap contracts and 5,25264,819 tons of hot roll coil swap contracts with a net assetliability value $0.9of $1.1 million, and $0.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, we had 3,402 tons of zinc swap contracts and 15,10220,319 tons of aluminum swap contracts with a net liabilityasset value of $1.3$0.9 million, and $1.0 million, respectively.1,375 tons of nickel swap contracts with a net asset value of $8.1 million. We do not currently account for these contractsswaps as hedges, but rather mark these contracts to market with a corresponding offset to current earnings. For the yeartwelve months ended December 31, 2017,2023, the Company recognized a gain of $3.1$10.7 million associated with its metal commodity derivatives.

A hypothetical strengthening or weakening of 10% in the commodity prices underlying the commodity derivative contracts from the market rate as of December 31, 20172023 would decreaseincrease or increasedecrease the fair value of the commodity derivative contracts by $0.4$2.0 million.

45


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.


ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page

Financial Statements

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

4947

The report of Ryerson Holding Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm (PCAOB ID: 42) with respect to the financial statements and their report on internal control over financial reporting are included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K at the page numbers referenced below. Their consent appears as Exhibit 23.1 of this Form 10-K.

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

5048

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 20212015

5251

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 20212015

5352

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 20212015

5453

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172023 and 20162022

5554

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 20212015

5655

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

5756

Financial Statements Schedule

I—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

88

II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

9388

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable. The required information is shown in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

46



MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Ryerson Holding Corporation (“the Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements under all potential conditions. Therefore, effective internal control over financial reporting provides only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance with respect to the preparation and presentation of financial statements.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Based on its assessment under that framework and the criteria established therein, the Company’s management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2023. Management’s assessment and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 excludes the internal control over financial reporting related to BLP Holdings, LLC (acquired on March 1, 2023), Norlen Incorporated (acquired on October 2, 2023), TSA Processing (acquired on November 1, 2023), and Hudson Tool Steel Corporation (acquired on December 1, 2023). These 4 acquisitions are included in the 2023 consolidated financial statements and when combined constituted 7.0% and 1.8% of total assets and total liabilities, respectively, as of December 31, 2023 and 0.8% and 1.2% of net sales and net income, respectively, for the year then ended.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, as stated in their report, which is included herein.



47


REPORTREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders’Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Ryerson Holding Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ryerson Holding Corporation and subsidiariesSubsidiary Companies (the Company) as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2023, and the related notes and schedulesfinancial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated March 5, 2018February 21, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the account or disclosure to which it relates.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Obligations

Description of

the Matter

At December 31, 2023, the Company’s projected benefit obligation related to its pension and other postretirement benefit obligations was $371.0 million and exceeded the fair value of pension and other postretirement plan assets of $260.3 million, resulting in an unfunded defined benefit pension and other postretirement obligation of $110.7 million. As explained in Note 10 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company remeasures the pension and other postretirement assets and obligations at the end of each year or more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events. The amounts are measured using actuarial valuations, which are dependent, in part, on the selection of certain actuarial assumptions. Auditing the pension and postretirement obligations was complex and required the involvement of specialists as a result of the judgmental

48


nature of the actuarial assumptions, such as discount rates and mortality rates used in the Company’s annual remeasurement process. These assumptions had a significant effect on the projected benefit obligation.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s valuation of the projected benefit obligation. For example, we tested the Company’s controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions utilized in the valuation, including discount and mortality rates. To test the projected benefit obligation, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, evaluating the methodology used, the significant actuarial assumptions described above, and the underlying data used by the Company. We evaluated the change in the projected benefit obligation from the prior year due to the change in service cost, interest cost, actuarial gains and losses, benefit payments, and other activities. In addition, we involved our actuary to assist in evaluating management’s methodology for selecting the appropriate discount rates that reflect the maturity and duration of the expected benefit payments and applying those discount rates to the benefit payments used to measure the projected benefit obligation. To evaluate the mortality rates, we assessed whether the information is consistent with publicly available information, and whether any adjustments for entity-specific factors were applied. We also tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data, including the participant data used in the actuarial calculations.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2006.

Chicago, Illinois

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024



49


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders’Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Ryerson Holding Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Opinion on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting

We have audited Ryerson Holding Corporation and subsidiaries’Subsidiary Companies' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Ryerson Holding Corporation and subsidiariesSubsidiary Companies (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on the COSO criteria.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of BLP Holdings, LLC, Norlen Incorporated, TSA Processing, and Hudson Tool Steel Corporation, which are included in the 2023 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted 7.0% and 1.8% of total assets and total liabilities, respectively, as of December 31, 2023 and 0.8% and 1.2% of net sales and net income, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of BLP Holdings, LLC, Norlen Incorporated, TSA Processing, and Hudson Tool Steel Corporation.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 20172023 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 5, 2018February 21, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

50


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 5, 2018


February 21, 2024

RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In millions, except per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net sales

 

$

3,364.7

 

 

$

2,859.7

 

 

$

3,167.2

 

Cost of materials sold

 

 

2,782.2

 

 

 

2,289.1

 

 

 

2,599.5

 

Gross profit

 

 

582.5

 

 

 

570.6

 

 

 

567.7

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and

   administrative

 

 

472.5

 

 

 

436.4

 

 

 

450.8

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

Restructuring and other charges

 

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

2.5

 

Impairment charges on assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.7

 

Operating profit

 

 

110.0

 

 

 

133.2

 

 

 

108.6

 

Other expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income and (expense), net

 

 

(2.3

)

 

 

(17.2

)

 

 

(10.4

)

Interest and other expense on debt

 

 

(91.0

)

 

 

(89.9

)

 

 

(96.3

)

Income before income taxes

 

 

16.7

 

 

 

26.1

 

 

 

1.9

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

3.7

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

18.9

 

 

 

(1.8

)

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(1.3

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Ryerson Holding

   Corporation

 

$

17.1

 

 

$

18.7

 

 

$

(0.5

)

Basic earnings (loss) per share

 

$

0.46

 

 

$

0.55

 

 

$

(0.02

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

0.46

 

 

$

0.54

 

 

$

(0.02

)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Net sales

 

$

5,108.7

 

 

$

6,323.6

 

 

$

5,675.3

 

Cost of materials sold

 

 

4,087.1

 

 

 

5,013.5

 

 

 

4,528.5

 

Gross profit

 

 

1,021.6

 

 

 

1,310.1

 

 

 

1,146.8

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative

 

 

793.5

 

 

 

735.2

 

 

 

711.2

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

(3.8

)

 

 

(109.6

)

Operating profit

 

 

228.1

 

 

 

578.7

 

 

 

545.2

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other expense on debt

 

 

(34.7

)

 

 

(33.2

)

 

 

(51.0

)

Pension settlement charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(98.7

)

Loss on retirement of debt

 

 

 

 

 

(21.3

)

 

 

(5.5

)

Other income and (expense), net

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(0.9

)

Income before income taxes

 

 

193.7

 

 

 

522.9

 

 

 

389.1

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

47.3

 

 

 

131.4

 

 

 

93.7

 

Net income

 

 

146.4

 

 

 

391.5

 

 

 

295.4

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

1.1

 

Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation

 

$

145.7

 

 

$

391.0

 

 

$

294.3

 

Basic earnings per share

 

$

4.17

 

 

$

10.41

 

 

$

7.67

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

$

4.10

 

 

$

10.21

 

 

$

7.56

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared per share

 

$

0.7175

 

 

$

0.5350

 

 

$

0.1650

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


51


RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In millions)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

18.0

 

 

$

18.9

 

 

$

(1.8

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

(12.9

)

Gain (loss) on intra-entity foreign currency transactions

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

(8.6

)

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

(8.9

)

Other-than-temporary impairment on available-for-sale investment

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

12.3

 

Liquidation of investment in foreign entity

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

Gain on cash flow hedges

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in defined benefit pension and other

   post-retirement benefit plans

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

(10.6

)

 

 

7.8

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax

 

 

27.7

 

 

 

(4.0

)

 

 

(10.3

)

Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other

   comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

5.8

 

Comprehensive income (loss), after tax

 

 

39.7

 

 

 

18.2

 

 

 

(17.9

)

Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the

   noncontrolling interest

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(1.8

)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Ryerson

   Holding Corporation

 

$

38.6

 

 

$

17.9

 

 

$

(16.1

)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Net income

 

$

146.4

 

 

$

391.5

 

 

$

295.4

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

(7.8

)

 

 

(2.1

)

Gain on cash flow hedges

 

 

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

2.1

 

Changes in defined benefit pension and other
   post-retirement benefit plans

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

38.6

 

 

 

142.4

 

Other comprehensive income, before tax

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

32.7

 

 

 

142.4

 

Income tax provision related to items of other
   comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

12.0

 

 

 

35.6

 

Comprehensive income, after tax

 

 

150.8

 

 

 

412.2

 

 

 

402.2

 

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

1.1

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation

 

$

150.1

 

 

$

411.7

 

 

$

401.1

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


52


RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

18.0

 

 

$

18.9

 

 

$

(1.8

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by

   (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

47.1

 

 

 

42.5

 

 

 

43.7

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

0.7

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(9.2

)

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

3.2

 

Provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

2.3

 

Restructuring and other charges

 

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

2.5

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

Impairment charges on assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.7

 

Other-than-temporary impairment charge on available-for-sale investments

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

12.3

 

(Gain) loss on retirement of debt

 

 

 

 

 

8.7

 

 

 

(0.3

)

Premium and fees paid related to debt modification

 

 

 

 

 

(15.7

)

 

 

 

Non-cash (gain) loss from derivatives

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

(5.4

)

 

 

2.3

 

Liquidation of investment in foreign entity

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

Other items

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(0.2

)

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

 

(44.0

)

 

 

(22.5

)

 

 

88.0

 

Inventories

 

 

(42.9

)

 

 

(6.5

)

 

 

178.1

 

Other assets

 

 

(8.1

)

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

6.8

 

Accounts payable

 

 

58.3

 

 

 

20.5

 

 

 

(12.4

)

Accrued liabilities

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

(5.2

)

 

 

(20.2

)

Accrued taxes payable/receivable

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

(1.7

)

Deferred employee benefit costs

 

 

(38.4

)

 

 

(40.7

)

 

 

(50.2

)

Net adjustments

 

 

(20.1

)

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

260.7

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

24.9

 

 

 

258.9

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

(50.3

)

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

(8.8

)

(Increase) decrease in restricted cash

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.8

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

(25.1

)

 

 

(23.0

)

 

 

(22.3

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

10.4

 

Proceeds from insurance settlement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

Other investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(71.7

)

 

 

(20.7

)

 

 

(18.0

)

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt issued

 

 

 

 

 

650.0

 

 

 

 

Repayment of debt

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(738.8

)

 

 

(59.9

)

Net proceeds/(repayments) of short-term borrowings

 

 

74.3

 

 

 

37.0

 

 

 

(164.4

)

Credit facility issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(4.0

)

Net increase (decrease) in book overdrafts

 

 

(18.0

)

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

(3.5

)

Long-term debt issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

(5.2

)

 

 

 

Principal payments on capital lease obligations

 

 

(14.4

)

 

 

(4.8

)

 

 

(1.9

)

Proceeds from sale leaseback transactions

 

 

24.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.7

 

Contributions from non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

66.6

 

 

 

12.4

 

 

 

(232.0

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(7.2

)

 

 

16.6

 

 

 

8.9

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

(5.7

)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

17.5

 

 

 

3.2

 

Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period

 

 

80.7

 

 

 

63.2

 

 

 

60.0

 

Cash and cash equivalents—end of period

 

$

77.4

 

 

$

80.7

 

 

$

63.2

 

Supplemental disclosures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid to third parties

 

$

84.9

 

 

$

89.2

 

 

$

86.7

 

Income taxes, net

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

3.2

 

Noncash investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset additions under capital leases and sale-leasebacks

 

$

42.8

 

 

$

5.3

 

 

$

11.5

 

Asset additions under financing arrangements

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

146.4

 

 

$

391.5

 

 

$

295.4

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
   operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

62.5

 

 

 

59.0

 

 

 

55.9

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

5.5

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

16.8

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

0.6

 

Provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

3.2

 

Loss on retirement of debt

 

 

 

 

 

21.3

 

 

 

5.5

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

 

 

(3.8

)

 

 

(109.6

)

Gain on bargain purchase

 

 

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

 

Non-cash (gain) loss from derivatives

 

 

(11.3

)

 

 

(17.9

)

 

 

27.6

 

Pension settlement charge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

98.7

 

Pension and other postretirement benefits curtailment gain

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other items

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

0.1

 

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

 

67.9

 

 

 

126.7

 

 

 

(252.5

)

Inventories

 

 

28.8

 

 

 

39.9

 

 

 

(227.9

)

Other assets and liabilities

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

19.2

 

 

 

(23.3

)

Accounts payable

 

 

24.8

 

 

 

(72.1

)

 

 

123.6

 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

(17.3

)

 

 

(17.5

)

 

 

32.0

 

Accrued taxes payable/receivable

 

 

23.3

 

 

 

(52.9

)

 

 

25.2

 

Deferred employee benefit costs

 

 

(11.6

)

 

 

(7.7

)

 

 

(25.0

)

Tenant improvement allowance

 

 

15.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net adjustments

 

 

218.7

 

 

 

109.7

 

 

 

(260.4

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

365.1

 

 

 

501.2

 

 

 

35.0

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

(137.8

)

 

 

(57.0

)

 

 

(14.5

)

Capital expenditures

 

 

(121.9

)

 

 

(105.1

)

 

 

(59.3

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

166.3

 

Proceeds from insurance settlement

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in subsidiary

 

 

 

 

 

(2.0

)

 

 

 

Other investing activities

 

 

(3.2

)

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

1.9

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

 

(262.1

)

 

 

(160.0

)

 

 

94.4

 

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of debt

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

(321.3

)

 

 

(157.3

)

Net proceeds of short-term borrowings

 

 

69.8

 

 

 

26.1

 

 

 

45.8

 

Credit facility issuance costs

 

 

 

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in book overdrafts

 

 

(7.1

)

 

 

29.6

 

 

 

(7.7

)

Principal payments on finance lease obligations

 

 

(7.1

)

 

 

(9.2

)

 

 

(10.5

)

Dividends paid to shareholders

 

 

(24.8

)

 

 

(19.9

)

 

 

(6.4

)

Share repurchases

 

 

(113.9

)

 

 

(50.0

)

 

 

(1.8

)

Contingent payment related to acquisitions

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax withholdings on stock-based compensation awards

 

 

(3.2

)

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(88.3

)

 

 

(350.1

)

 

 

(137.9

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

14.7

 

 

 

(8.9

)

 

 

(8.5

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(3.0

)

 

 

(1.6

)

Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

14.9

 

 

 

(11.9

)

 

 

(10.1

)

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash—beginning of period

 

 

40.5

 

 

 

52.4

 

 

 

62.5

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash—end of period

 

$

55.4

 

 

$

40.5

 

 

$

52.4

 

Supplemental disclosures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid to third parties, net

 

$

29.9

 

 

$

38.3

 

 

$

51.1

 

Income taxes, net

 

 

6.2

 

 

 

176.9

 

 

 

70.2

 

Noncash activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset additions under operating leases

 

 

138.8

 

 

 

61.6

 

 

 

129.6

 

Asset additions under finance leases

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

15.8

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


53


RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except shares)shares and per share data)

 

At December 31,

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

77.4

 

 

$

80.7

 

 

$

54.3

 

 

$

39.2

 

Restricted cash (Note 3)

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.3

 

Receivables less provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts of $4.9 in 2017 and $4.6 in 2016

 

 

376.3

 

 

 

326.0

 

Receivables less provisions of $1.7 at December 31, 2023 and $3.2 at December 31, 2022 (Note 17)

 

 

467.7

 

 

 

514.4

 

Inventories (Note 4)

 

 

616.5

 

 

 

563.4

 

 

 

782.5

 

 

 

798.5

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

32.6

 

 

 

26.7

 

 

 

77.8

 

 

 

88.2

 

Total current assets

 

 

1,103.9

 

 

 

997.8

 

 

 

1,383.4

 

 

 

1,441.6

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation (Note 5)

 

 

422.9

 

 

 

388.2

 

 

 

589.6

 

 

 

458.4

 

Deferred income taxes (Note 17)

 

 

17.9

 

 

 

24.4

 

Other intangible assets (Note 6)

 

 

46.9

 

 

 

40.8

 

Goodwill (Note 7)

 

 

115.3

 

 

 

103.2

 

Operating lease assets (Note 6)

 

 

349.4

 

 

 

240.5

 

Other intangible assets (Note 7)

 

 

73.7

 

 

 

50.9

 

Goodwill (Note 8)

 

 

157.8

 

 

 

129.2

 

Deferred charges and other assets

 

 

5.0

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

15.7

 

 

 

13.7

 

Total assets

 

$

1,711.9

 

 

$

1,558.7

 

 

$

2,569.6

 

 

$

2,334.3

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

275.0

 

 

$

230.4

 

 

$

463.4

 

 

$

438.4

 

Accrued liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries, wages, and commissions

 

 

40.3

 

 

 

36.8

 

 

 

51.9

 

 

 

67.3

 

Interest on debt

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

9.8

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

48.4

 

 

 

27.9

 

 

 

75.9

 

 

 

77.7

 

Short-term debt (Note 9)

 

 

21.3

 

 

 

19.2

 

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

5.8

 

Current portion of deferred employee benefits

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

8.3

 

Current portion of operating lease liabilities (Note 6)

 

 

30.5

 

 

 

25.2

 

Current portion of deferred employee benefits (Note 10)

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

4.8

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

402.7

 

 

 

332.4

 

 

 

633.9

 

 

 

619.2

 

Long-term debt (Note 9)

 

 

1,024.4

 

 

 

944.3

 

 

 

428.3

 

 

 

361.2

 

Deferred employee benefits (Note 10)

 

 

243.5

 

 

 

298.8

 

 

 

106.7

 

 

 

118.0

 

Noncurrent operating lease liabilities (Note 6)

 

 

336.8

 

 

 

215.1

 

Deferred income taxes (Note 18)

 

 

135.5

 

 

 

113.5

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

 

48.7

 

 

 

32.5

 

 

 

13.9

 

 

 

14.3

 

Total liabilities

 

 

1,719.3

 

 

 

1,608.0

 

 

 

1,655.1

 

 

 

1,441.3

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity (deficit):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 7,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued

at 2017 and 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 37,421,081

shares issued at 2017; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 37,345,117 issued

at 2016

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.4

 

Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 7,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 39,450,659 shares issued at December 31, 2023; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 39,059,198 issued at December 31, 2022

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.4

 

Capital in excess of par value

 

 

377.6

 

 

 

375.4

 

 

 

411.6

 

 

 

397.7

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(95.1

)

 

 

(112.2

)

Treasury stock at cost – Common stock of 212,500 shares in 2017 and 2016

 

 

(6.6

)

 

 

(6.6

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(286.3

)

 

 

(307.8

)

Total Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

(10.0

)

 

 

(50.8

)

Retained earnings

 

 

813.2

 

 

 

692.5

 

Treasury stock at cost – Common stock of 5,413,434 shares at December 31, 2023 and 2,070,654 shares at December 31, 2022

 

 

(179.3

)

 

 

(61.1

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 15)

 

 

(140.0

)

 

 

(144.4

)

Total Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity

 

 

905.9

 

 

 

885.1

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

7.9

 

Total equity (deficit)

 

 

(7.4

)

 

 

(49.3

)

Total equity

 

 

914.5

 

 

 

893.0

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

1,711.9

 

 

$

1,558.7

 

 

$

2,569.6

 

 

$

2,334.3

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


54


RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In millions, except shares in thousands)

 

 

Ryerson Holding Corporation Stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common

Stock

 

 

Treasury

Stock

 

 

Capital in

Excess of

Par Value

 

 

Accumulated

Deficit

 

 

Foreign

Currency

Translation

 

 

Benefit Plan Liabilities

 

 

Unrealized

Gain (Loss) on

Available-For-

Sale

Investments

 

 

Cash Flow Hedge - Interest Rate Swap

 

 

Non-

controlling

Interest

 

 

Total

Equity

 

 

Redeemable

Non-

controlling

Interest

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Shares

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

Balance at January 1, 2015

 

 

32,250

 

 

$

0.3

 

 

 

213

 

 

$

(6.6

)

 

$

302.0

 

 

$

(130.4

)

 

$

(32.8

)

 

$

(255.8

)

 

$

(2.8

)

 

$

 

 

$

1.6

 

 

$

(124.5

)

 

$

1.0

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

(0.6

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(12.6

)

 

 

(0.3

)

Loss on intra-entity foreign currency transactions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8.6

)

 

 

 

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $4.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment, net of tax of $3.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5.5

)

 

 

 

Other-than-temporary impairment, net of tax of $4.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.6

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

32,312

 

 

$

0.3

 

 

 

213

 

 

$

(6.6

)

 

$

302.6

 

 

$

(130.9

)

 

$

(53.8

)

 

$

(252.5

)

 

$

(0.7

)

 

$

 

 

$

0.7

 

 

$

(140.9

)

 

$

0.1

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

19.5

 

 

 

(0.6

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

Gain on intra-entity foreign currency transactions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $4.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6.2

)

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment, net of tax of $0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

 

Other-than-temporary impairment, net of tax of $1.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

71.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

 

Contributions from non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

Liquidation of investment in foreign entity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

37,345

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

 

213

 

 

$

(6.6

)

 

$

375.4

 

 

$

(112.2

)

 

$

(50.2

)

 

$

(258.7

)

 

$

1.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

1.5

 

 

$

(49.3

)

 

$

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

 

Gain on intra-entity foreign currency transactions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

 

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $5.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.4

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment, net of tax of $0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

Other-than-temporary impairment, net of tax of $0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

76

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

 

Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

 

37,421

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

 

213

 

 

$

(6.6

)

 

$

377.6

 

 

$

(95.1

)

 

$

(41.6

)

 

$

(246.3

)

 

$

1.0

 

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

2.6

 

 

$

(7.4

)

 

$

 

 

 

Ryerson Holding Corporation Stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common
Stock

 

 

Treasury
Stock

 

 

Capital in
Excess of
Par Value

 

 

Retained
Earnings

 

 

Foreign
Currency
Translation

 

 

Benefit
Plan
Liabilities

 

 

Cash Flow
Hedge -
Interest
Rate Swap

 

 

Non-
controlling
Interest

 

 

Total
Equity

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Shares

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Dollars

 

Balance at January 1, 2021

 

 

38,330

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

 

(213

)

 

$

(6.6

)

 

$

383.1

 

 

$

33.8

 

 

$

(47.0

)

 

$

(221.8

)

 

$

(3.1

)

 

$

6.3

 

 

$

145.1

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

294.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

295.4

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.1

)

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $35.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107.3

 

Share repurchases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(80

)

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.8

)

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

357

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.5

 

Cash dividends and dividend equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6.4

)

Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

Balance at December 31, 2021

 

 

38,687

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

 

(293

)

 

$

(8.4

)

 

$

388.6

 

 

$

321.7

 

 

$

(49.1

)

 

$

(114.5

)

 

$

(1.5

)

 

$

7.4

 

 

$

544.6

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

391.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

391.5

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.8

)

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $11.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27.0

 

Share repurchases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,701

)

 

 

(50.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(50.0

)

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

372

 

 

 

 

 

 

(77

)

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.4

 

Cash dividends and dividend equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20.2

)

Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap, net of tax of $0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

 

Balance at December 31, 2022

 

 

39,059

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

 

(2,071

)

 

$

(61.1

)

 

$

397.7

 

 

$

692.5

 

 

$

(56.9

)

 

$

(87.5

)

 

$

 

 

$

7.9

 

 

$

893.0

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

145.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

146.4

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.7

 

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax of zero

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

Share repurchases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,252

)

 

 

(115.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(115.0

)

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

391

 

 

 

 

 

 

(90

)

 

 

(3.2

)

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.6

 

Issuance of common stock

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends and dividend equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(25.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(24.9

)

Balance at December 31, 2023

 

 

39,451

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

 

(5,413

)

 

$

(179.3

)

 

$

411.6

 

 

$

813.2

 

 

$

(52.2

)

 

$

(87.8

)

 

$

 

 

$

8.6

 

 

$

914.5

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


55


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1: Summary of Accounting and Financial Policies

Business Description and Basis of Presentation. Ryerson Holding Corporation (“Ryerson Holding”), a Delaware corporation, is the parent company of Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (“JT Ryerson”), a Delaware corporation. Affiliates of Platinum Equity, LLC (“Platinum”) own approximately 21,037,5003,924,478 shares of our common stock, which is approximately 57%11.5% of our issued and outstanding common stock. On February 28, 2023, Platinum sold 2,486,580 shares of common stock through an underwritten secondary offering. Concurrently, Ryerson Holding completed a share repurchase from Platinum of 1,513,420 shares of common stock. On May 8, 2023, Platinum sold 2,630,700 shares of its common stock through an underwritten secondary offering. Concurrently, Ryerson Holding completed a share repurchase from Platinum of 1,369,300 shares of common stock. Also, on August 8, 2023, Platinum sold 4,000,000 shares of its common stock through an underwritten secondary offering. Following the close of those transactions, Platinum's ownership of our common stock decreased from approximately 43% to approximately 11.5%. Ryerson Holding is no longer a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of The New York Stock Exchange.

We are a leading value-added processor and distributor of industrial metals with operations in the United StatesU.S. through JT Ryerson and other U.S. subsidiaries, in Canada through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Ryerson Canada”), and in Mexico through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Metals de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (“Ryerson Mexico”). In addition to our North American operations, we conduct materials processing and distribution operations in China through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Ryerson China Limited, a Chinese limited liability company (“Ryerson China”). Unless the context indicates otherwise, Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, Ryerson Canada, Ryerson China,Mexico, and Ryerson MexicoChina together with their subsidiaries, are collectively referred to herein as “Ryerson,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company.”

Principles of Consolidation. The Company consolidates entities in which it owns or controls more than 50%50% of the voting shares. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Equity Investments. Investments in affiliates in which the Company’s ownership is 20% to 50% and investments in limited partnerships are accounted for by the equity method. Equity income is reported in other income and (expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Equity loss amounted to $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Equity income during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was zero.

Business Segments. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 280, “Segment Reporting” (“ASC 280”), establishes standards for reporting information on operating segments in interim and annual financial statements. Our Board of Directors, which includes our Chief Executive Officer, together with our Board of Directors, serve as our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”). Our CODM reviews our financial information for purposes of making operational decisions and assessing financial performance. The CODM views our business globally as metals service centers. We have one operating and reportable segment, metal service centers, in accordance with the criteria set forth in ASC 280.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) in the United StatesU.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and related notes to the financial statements. Changes in such estimates may affect amounts reported in future periods.

Reclassifications. Certain amounts in the 2016 and 2015 financial statements, as previously reported, have been revised to conform to the 2017 presentation. These changes did not have a material impact on the presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

Equity Investments. Investments in affiliates in which the Company’s ownership is 20% to 50% are accounted for by the equity method. Equity income is reported in “Other income and (expense), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Equity income during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 totaled $0.1million, $0.2 million, and $0.2 million, respectively.

Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 605,606,Revenue Recognitionfrom Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”). Revenue is recognized uponbased on the consideration expected to be received for delivery of as-is or processed metal products when, or as, the Company satisfies its contractual obligation to transfer control of a product to customers.a customer, which we refer to as a performance obligation. See Note 16: Revenue is recorded net of returns, allowances, customer discounts and incentives. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accountedRecognition for on a net (excluded from revenues) basis. further details.

Provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and set credit limits based upon review ofThe Company follows the customers’ current credit information and payment history.guidance under ASC 326 “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses” (“ASC 326”). The Company monitors customer payments and maintains a provision for estimated credit losses based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues that the Company has identified. Estimation of such losses requires adjusting historical loss experience for current economic conditions and judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers. The Company cannot guarantee that the rate of future credit losses will be similar to past experience. ProvisionsSee Note 17: Provision for allowances and claims are based upon historical rates, expected trends, and estimates of potential returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives. The Company considers all available information when assessing the adequacy of the provisionCredit Losses for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts.further details.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are classified in “Net Sales”net sales in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Shipping and handling costs primarily distribution costs, are classified in “Warehousing,warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative”administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. These costs totaled $84.8$139.1 million, $76.4$137.8 million, and $77.8$125.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015,2021, respectively. In accordance with ASC 606,the Company has


56


elected to treat shipping and handling costs as an activity necessary to fulfill the performance obligation to transfer product to the customer and not as a separate performance obligation. Shipping and handling costs are estimated at quarter end in proportion to revenue recognized for transactions where actual costs are not yet known.

Benefits for Retired Employees. The Company recognizes the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with changes in the funded status recognized through accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, in the year in which the changes occur. Service cost is included in warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses and all other components of net benefit costs are recognized in other income and (expense), net, in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The estimated cost of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan and its postretirement medical benefits are determined annually or upon plan remeasurement after considering information provided by consulting actuaries. Key factors used in developing estimates of these liabilities include assumptions related to discount rates, rates of return on investments, mortality rates, future compensation costs, healthcare cost trends, benefit payment patterns, and other factors. The cost of these benefits for retirees is accrued during their term of employment. Pensions are funded primarily in accordance with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) of 1974 and the Pension Protection Act of 2006 into a trust established for the Ryerson Pension Plan.2006. Costs for retired employee medical benefits are funded when claims are submitted. Certain salaried employees are covered by a defined contribution plan, for which the cost is expensed in the period earned.

Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents reflected in the financial statements are highly liquid, short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less. Checks issued in excess of funds on deposit at the bank represent “book” overdrafts. We reclassified $51.2$99.7million and $69.2 $106.8million to accounts payable at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.

Inventory Valuation. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. We primarily use the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method for valuing our domestic inventories. We use the moving average cost and the specific cost methods for valuing our foreign inventories.

Property, Plant, and Equipment. Property, plant, and equipment, including land use rights and capitalfinance lease assets, are depreciated for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The provision for depreciation in all periods presented is based on the following estimated useful lives of the assets:

Land improvements

20 years

Buildings

45 years

Machinery and equipment

10-15 10-15 years

Furniture and fixtures

10 years

Transportation equipment

3-6 3-6 years

Software

5 years

Land use rights

50 years

Expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are charged against income in the period incurred.

Internal-Use Software. Software is recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 350-40, "Internal-Use Software" ("ASC 350-40"). The Company has various software that is acquired, internally developed, or modified solely to meet the Company's internal needs, and software that the Company obtains access to in cloud computing arrangements that includes internal-use software licenses. Software development costs are capitalized when the preliminary project stage is complete and the development stage of the project commences, it is probable that the project will be complete, and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Costs associated with preliminary project stage activities, training, maintenance, and all other post implementation stage activities are expensed as incurred. The capitalization policy provides for the capitalization of certain payroll costs for employees who are directly associated with developing internal-use software as well as certain external direct costs. Capitalized employee costs are limited to the time directly spent on such projects. We also capitalize certain costs related to specific upgrades and enhancements when it is probable the expenditures will result in additional functionality. Our cloud computing arrangements that include a license to an internal use software which does not meet the criteria as defined by ASC 350-40 are accounted for as service contracts and do not constitute a purchase of a software or license to a software and as such are accounted as prepaid expenses and are amortized over the prepayment period. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022 we had $1.9 million and $2.0 million of software in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. See Note 5: Property Plan and Equipment for the balances of software costs capitalized to fixed assets.

Leases. Leases are recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 842, “Leases” (“ASC 842”). TheCompany leases various assets including real estate, trucks, trailers, mobile equipment, processing equipment, and IT equipment. See Note 6: Leases, for further details.

57


Goodwill. In accordance with FASB ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”), goodwill is reviewed at least annually for impairment or whenever indicators of potential impairment exist. We test for impairment of goodwill by assessing various qualitative factors with respect to developments in our business and the overall economy and calculating the fair value of a reporting unit using the discounted cash flow method, as necessary.economy. If we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value based on our qualitative assessment, we will proceed to the quantitative goodwill impairment test, in which we compare the fair value of the reporting unit where the goodwill resides to its carrying value. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unitsunit is estimated using a combination of an income approach and a market approach as this combination is deemed to be the most indicative of fair value in an orderly transaction between market participants.

Long-lived Assets and Other Intangible Assets. Long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. TheWhen this occurs, the Company estimates the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment is recognized. Any related impairment loss is calculated based upon comparison of the fair value to the carrying value of the asset. Separate intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives. An impaired intangible asset would be written down to fair value, using the discounted cash flow method.

Deferred Financing Costs. Deferred financing costs associated with the issuance of debt are being amortized using either the effective interest method or straight line method over the life of the debt.debt in accordance with FASB ASC 470, “Debt” (“ASC 470”). Deferred financing costs related to a recognized debt liability are presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability.

Foreign Currency. The Company translates assets and liabilities of its foreign subsidiaries, where the functional currency is the local currency, into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange on the last day of the reporting period. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates prevailing during the year.

For foreign currency transactions, the Company translates these amounts to the Company’s functional currency at the exchange rate effective on the invoice date. If the exchange rate changes between the time of purchase and the time actual payment is made, a foreign exchange transaction gain or loss results which is included in determining net income for the year. The Company recognized an exchange loss of $2.0 million, $1.6 million, and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. These amounts are classified either in Other income and (expense), net or Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets or liabilities reflect temporary differences between amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting. Such amounts are adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect changes in enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance is established to offset any deferred tax assets if, based upon the


available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of the amount of a valuation allowance to be provided on recorded deferred tax assets involves estimates regarding (1) the timing and amount of the reversal of taxable temporary differences, (2) expected future taxable income, (3) the impact of tax planning strategies, and (4) the ability to carry back tax losses to offset prior taxable income. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including past operating results, projections of future taxable income, and the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies. The projections of future taxable income include a number of estimates and assumptions regarding volume, pricing, costs, and industry cyclicality.

Significant judgment is required in determining income tax provisions and in evaluating tax positions. In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are examined by various federal, state, and foreign tax authorities. The Company records the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not (i.e., greater than 50% likely) to be sustained onin audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company regularly assesses the potential outcomes of these examinations and any future examinations for the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. The Company continually assesses the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjusts the income tax provision, the current tax liability, and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.

The Company recognizes the benefit of tax positions when a benefit is more likely than not (i.e., greater than 50% likely) to be sustained on its technical merits. Recognized tax benefits are measured at the largest amount that is more likely than not to be sustained, based on cumulative probability, in final settlement of the position. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

58


Earnings Per Share Data. Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period, unless inclusion of the potential common shares would have an antidilutive effect. Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents such as stock options and warrants, while diluted earnings (loss) per share, assuming dilution, includes such dilutive effects.

Foreign Currency.Stock-Based Compensation. All of our stock-based compensation plans are classified as equity awards. The Company translates assetsfair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and liabilities of its foreign subsidiaries, where the functional currencyperformance stock units (“PSUs”) is the local currency, into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchangedetermined based on the last dayfair value of our common stock on the grant date. The fair value of stock options is estimated based on a Monte Carlo simulation and considers variables such as volatility, dividend yield, risk-free rate, and the expected exercise multiple in computing the value of the reporting period. Revenuesoptions. The fair value of stock options, RSUs, and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates prevailing during the year.

For foreign currency transactions, the Company translates these amountsPSUs is expensed on a straight-line basis over their respective vesting periods. We have elected to the Company’s functional currency at the exchange rate effective on the invoice date. If the exchange rate changes between the time of purchase and the time actual payment is made, a foreign exchange transaction gain or loss results which is included in determining net income (loss)recognize forfeitures as they occur. See Note 11: Stock-Based Compensation for the year. The Company recognized $2.8 million and $4.0 million of exchange losses and $3.3 million of exchange gains for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. These amounts are primarily classified in “Other income and (expense), net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.  further details.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards–Adopted

No accounting pronouncements have been issued that impact our financial statements.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards–Not Yet Adopted

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)November 2023, FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-07, 2023-07, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Simplifying the TransitionSegment Reporting (Topic 280)”. The amendments in this update require public entities to the Equity Method of Accounting.” The amendment eliminates the retroactive adjustments toenhance segment disclosures on both an investment upon it qualifying for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence by the investor. ASU 2016-07 requires that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor's previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment qualifies for equity method accounting. The update was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We adopted this guidancebasis. These disclosures include, among others, significant segment expenses regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (CODM), an amount for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Clarifying the Definition of a Business”.  The guidance in ASU 2017-01 was issued to provide clarityother segment items, and title and position of the definition of a business withCODM and how the objective to assist entitiesCODM uses this information in the evaluation of whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition of assets or a business.assessing performance. The updateASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,2023 and is to be applied on a prospective basis.  Early adoption is permitted.  We adopted this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017.  The adoptioninterim periods of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.


In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”.  The objective of the guidance in ASU 2017-04 is to simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.  To test goodwill under this amendment, an entity should perform its annual impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount.  An impairment charge is recognized in the amount that the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020,2024 and is to be applied on a prospective basis.  Early adoption is permitted.  We adopted this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017.  The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities”.  The objective of the amendment is to better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships. Changes are made to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. Certain targeted improvements are also made to simplify the application of hedge accounting guidance and ease the administrative burden of hedge documentation requirements and assessing hedge effectiveness.  The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and the amended presentation and disclosure guidance is to be applied on a prospective basis.  Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period.  We adopted this guidance effective July 1, 2017.  The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting StandardsNot Yet Adopted

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which created ASC 606 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition.” The guidance in ASU 2014-09 and subsequently issued amendments outlines a comprehensive model for all entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers as well as required disclosures.  Under the new standard, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.  The new standard requires additional disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers including significant judgments and changes in judgments. The new standard permits two methods of adoption: the full retrospective method or the modified retrospective transition method. We will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method with the cumulative effect recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the date of adoption.

We have established a project management team to analyze the impact of the new standard.  The team has evaluated our different revenue streams and reviewed representative contracts with customers to identify if there are differences that would result from the application of the new standard as compared to our current accounting policies and practices.  Under the new standard, the Company will recognize revenue on an over time basis for a subset of revenues associated with custom fabricated products instead of upon delivery of the fabricated product to the customer. The Company is finalizing the quantification of the effects on our consolidated financial statements. We will record the cumulative adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the date of adoption. We anticipate that the net transition adjustment recorded to retained earnings will be between $1 million and $4 million. The Company has also implemented new business processes and internal controls in order to recognize revenue in accordance with the new standard.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." The amendments in ASU 2016-01 change the accounting for non-consolidated equity investments that are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting by requiring changes in fair value to be recognized in net income.  Under current guidance, changes in fair value for investments of this nature are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders’ equity. Additionally, ASU 2016-01 simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values; requires entities to use the exit price when estimating the fair value of financial instruments; and modifies various presentation disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The amendments should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustmentadopted retrospectively to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The amendments related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values (including disclosure requirements) should be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption. The update is effective for interim and annual reportingall prior periods beginning after December 15, 2017.  Early adoption is permitted. We will adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Our available-for-sale investment as of December 31, 2017 has a fair value of $0.1 million.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” codified in ASC 842, “Leases.” The guidance requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by all leases with terms of more than 12 months. The amendment also will require disclosures designed to give financial statement users information on the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative information. The update is


effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative periodpresented in the financial statements, and have the option to use certain relief. Early adoption is permitted. We will adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019. The Company is working to gather lists of all leases and is in the process of implementing a lease software to be used for lease tracking, reporting, and disclosures.statements. We are still assessing the impact of adoption, on ourbut do not expect this guidance to materially impact the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, theDecember 2023, FASB issued ASU 2016-13, 2023-09, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.Income Taxes (Topic 740). The amendment requires financial assets measured at amortized cost basisamendments in this update require public businesses to be presented atdisclose specific categories in the net amount expected to be collected, thus eliminating the probable initial recognition thresholdrate reconciliation and instead reflecting the current estimate of all expected credit losses. The amendmentfurther information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. This update also requires that credit losses relatingfurther disclosures of income taxes paid disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions as well as by the individual jurisdiction in which income taxes are paid if the amount paid is equal to available-for-sale debt securities be recorded through an allowance for credit losses ratheror greater than five percent of total income taxes paid. Further, this update requires a write-down, thus enabling the ability to record reversalsdisclosure of credit losses in current period net income. Theincome or loss from continuing operations before income tax expense disaggregated between domestic and foreign and income tax expense or benefit disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign. This update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. An entity will apply the amendment through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach). A prospective transition approach is required for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date. The effect of a prospective transition approach is to maintain the same amortized cost basis before2024 and after the effective date of this update. Early adoption is permitted only for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We will adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2020. We are still assessing the impact of adoption on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Certain Cash Payments.” The amendments address the diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. Early adoption is permitted. We will adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes – Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The amendment requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Earlyearly adoption is permitted. We will adoptdo not expect this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018.  The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a materialmaterially impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18 “Statement of Cash Flows – Restricted Cash.” The amendment requires entities to include in their cash and cash-equivalent balances in the statement of cash flows those amounts that are deemed to be restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The ASU does not define the terms “restricted cash” and “restricted cash equivalents.” The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. Early adoption is permitted. We will adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits:  Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post Retirement Benefit Cost.  The amendment requires entities to disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and limits the capitalization of net benefit cost to only the service cost component.  The amendment also provides explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the statement of comprehensive income.   The amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.  The disclosure requirements of the amendments should be applied retrospectively and the requirements concerning capitalization of the net service costs should be applied prospectively.  We will adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018.  Adoption of this guidance will result in a reclass between warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense, and other income and (expense), net lines within of the Consolidated Statements of Operations, with no impact on gross margins.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation:  Scope of Modification Accounting”.  The amendment provides guidance about which changes to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply the accounting guidance on modifications to share-based payment awards.  The guidance is effective for interim and annual


reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We will adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018.  The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2: Acquisitions

The Laserflex Corporation2023 Acquisitions

On January 19, 2017,March 1, 2023, JT Ryerson Holding acquired The Laserflex Corporation (“Laserflex”BLP Holdings, LLC ("BLP"),. Based out of Houston, Texas, BLP is comprised of three divisions: Absolute Metal Products, Metal Cutting Specialists, and Houston Water Jet, serving various industries such as oil & gas, aerospace, telecommunications, and structural fabrication. BLP provides complex fabrication services in addition to toll processing, including saw cutting, machining, and water jet cutting.

On October 2, 2023, JT Ryerson acquired Norlen Incorporated ("Norlen"). Based out of Schofield, Wisconsin, Norlen is a privately-ownedfull-service metal fabricator, specializingproviding stamping, machining, painting, and additional value-added fabrication services to industries including agriculture, HVAC, and defense.

On November 1, 2023, JT Ryerson acquired TSA Processing ("TSA"). Headquartered in laser fabrication metalHouston, Texas, with five other locations across the Midwest and Southern United States, TSA is a stainless steel and aluminum coil and sheet processor.

On December 1, 2023, JT Ryerson acquired Hudson Tool Steel Corporation ("Hudson"). Hudson is headquartered in Cerritos, California, with two facilities located in the Midwest and Northeast. Hudson is a supplier of tool steels and high-speed, carbon, and alloy steels.

59


The 2023 acquisitions will strengthen and expand JT Ryerson's valued-add services within our industry-leading stainless and aluminum franchises as well as our tool steel capabilities which will allow us to increase our offerings to better serve our diverse customer base across our entire network. We paid a total of $127.5 million, net of cash acquired, as of December 31, 2023 for the 2023 acquisitions. As of December 31, 2023, there was $2.1 million of unpaid purchase consideration accrued on the Consolidated Balance Sheet relating to holdback payments expected to be paid within 18 months, working capital true ups, and contingent consideration.

We deemed the 2023 acquisitions individually immaterial, yet significant in the aggregate to the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Included in our Statement of Operations for the year-ended December 31, 2023 were net sales of $43.2 million and net income of $1.8 million related to the 2023 acquisitions. The Consolidated Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2023 includes revenues and expenses of each acquisition since its respective acquisition date. The 2023 acquisitions are insignificant to the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year-ended December 31, 2023.

The preliminary allocations of the total purchase price from our combined 2023 acquisitions to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were as follows:

 

(In millions)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

5.8

 

Receivables, less provisions

 

20.4

 

Inventories

 

11.6

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

2.2

 

Property, plant, and equipment

 

47.7

 

Operating lease assets

 

35.0

 

Other intangible assets

 

31.3

 

Goodwill

 

26.3

 

Other noncurrent assets

 

1.1

 

    Total identifiable assets acquired

 

181.4

 

Accounts payable

 

(7.2

)

Salaries, wages, and commissions

 

(2.0

)

Other accrued liabilities

 

(0.5

)

Operating lease liabilities

 

(32.4

)

Deferred income taxes

 

(3.9

)

    Total liabilities assumed

 

(46.0

)

    Net identifiable assets acquired

 

135.4

 

The purchase price allocations for our 2023 acquisitions are pending the completion of purchase price adjustments.

The 2023 acquisitions discussed above were all accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase price for each transaction has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair values at the date of each acquisition. As needed, for each transaction the Company used a third-party valuation firm to estimate the fair values of property, plant, and equipment, leases, earn-outs, and intangible assets. Inventory was valued by the Company using acquisition date fair values of the metals. The consolidated balance sheets reflect the allocations of each acquisition's purchase price as of December 31, 2023. The measurement period for purchase price allocations will end 12 months after each acquisition date.

Included in the total purchase price is $0.9 million of contingent consideration at fair value. The contingent consideration is based on the attainment of certain financial metrics over the course of 4 years following the acquisition date with a maximum payout of $5.1 million. The fair value of the contingent consideration as of acquisition date was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation.

As part of the purchase price allocations for the 2023 acquisitions, we allocated $7.6 million to trade names and $23.7 million to customer relationships with weighted average lives of 14.3 years and 14.0 years, respectively. The goodwill arising from the 2023 acquisitions consists largely of expected strategic benefits, including enhanced operational scale, as well as expansion of acquired product and processing and welding with locationscapabilities across our Company. See Note: 8 Goodwill for further information on the goodwill added in Columbus, Ohio2023.

2023 Asset Acquisition

During the first six months of 2023, JT Ryerson completed the purchase of certain assets from ExOne Operating, LLC. The total amount paid by JT Ryerson for the acquired assets was $9.7 million. The transaction qualified for asset acquisition accounting and Wellford, South Carolina.The acquisition is not material to our consolidated financial statements.

60


2022 Acquisition Activity

Guy Metals,On November 1, 2022, JT Ryerson paid $31.8 million to acquire Excelsior, Inc.

On February 15, 2017, ("Excelsior"). During the first six months of 2023, JT Ryerson Holding acquired Guy Metals, Inc. (“Guy Metals”),paid an additional $0.6 million related to the net working capital adjustments.

Note 3: Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

The following table provides a privately-owned metal service center company located in Hammond, Wisconsin.The acquisition is not materialreconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to our consolidated financial statements.

Southern Tool Steel

On August 3, 2015, the Company acquired alltotal of the issuedbeginning and outstanding capital stockending cash balances shown in the Consolidated Statements of Southern Tool Steel, Inc. (“Southern Tool”). Southern Tool is a distributor of long products, predominantly processed bars and tool steel, and is based in Chattanooga, TN.The acquisition is not material to our consolidated financial statements.Cash Flows:

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

54.3

 

 

$

39.2

 

Restricted cash

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.3

 

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

$

55.4

 

 

$

40.5

 

Note 3: Restricted Cash

We havehad cash restricted for the purposes of covering letters of credit that can be presented for potential insurance claims, which totaled $1.1 million and $1.0 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.claims.

Note 4: Inventories

The Company primarily uses the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method of valuing inventory. Inventories, at stated LIFO value, were classified at December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 as follows:

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

In process and finished products

 

$

782.5

 

 

$

798.5

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

In process and finished products

 

$

616.5

 

 

$

563.4

 

If current cost had been used to value inventories, such inventories would have been $71$148 million higher and $115$245 million lowerhigher than reported at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively. Approximately 89%88% and 90%90% of inventories are accounted for under the LIFO method at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively. Non-LIFO inventories consist primarily of inventory at our foreign facilities using the moving average cost and the specific cost methods. Substantially all of our inventories consist of finished products.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. We record amounts required, if any, to reduce the carrying value of inventory to its lower of cost or market as a charge to cost of materials sold. The lower of cost or market reserve totaled zero and $23.9 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company has consignment inventory at certain customer locations, which totaled $8.9$7.1 million and $11.1$7.4 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.


Note 5: Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 20172023 and 2016:2022:

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Land and land improvements

 

$

71.7

 

 

$

66.1

 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

 

 

211.7

 

 

 

158.4

 

Machinery, equipment, and other

 

 

647.4

 

 

 

532.0

 

Finance leases

 

 

42.2

 

 

 

39.0

 

Software

 

 

30.8

 

 

 

19.7

 

Construction in progress

 

 

67.7

 

 

 

83.4

 

Total

 

 

1,071.5

 

 

 

898.6

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(481.9

)

 

 

(440.2

)

Net property, plant, and equipment

 

$

589.6

 

 

$

458.4

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Land and land improvements

 

$

92.6

 

 

$

89.1

 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

 

 

198.8

 

 

 

191.2

 

Machinery, equipment, and other

 

 

377.9

 

 

 

361.2

 

Capital and financing leases

 

 

65.5

 

 

 

23.5

 

Construction in progress

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

3.7

 

Total

 

 

742.7

 

 

 

668.7

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(319.8

)

 

 

(280.5

)

Net property, plant, and equipment

 

$

422.9

 

 

$

388.2

 

61


The Company recorded impairment charges related to fixed assets of $0.1 million, $0.4 million, and $7.5 million forDuring the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, the Company completed several asset sales in the form of sale-leasebacks to generate cash proceeds that were, in part, utilized to redeem a portion of the 8.50% senior secured notes due 2028 (the “2028 Notes”), and 2015,also in a continued effort to optimize our facility footprint. Each of these sale-leasebacks were for varying periods of time, ranging from 21 months to 15 years, and therefore the Company recorded right of use assets of $95.1 million and lease liabilities of $86.4 million. See Note 6: Leases for further discussion of the individually significant leaseback transaction. As a result of these transactions, $65.4 million of land and building assets, net of accumulated depreciation, were sold for net cash proceeds of $163.2 million, resulting in a total gain of $107.7 million.

The Company also had normal course asset sale activity which generated additional cash proceeds of $0.5 million, $8.0 million, and $3.1 million at December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Note 6: Leases

The impairment charges recordedCompany leases various assets including real estate, trucks, trailers, cars, mobile equipment, processing equipment, and IT equipment. The Company has noncancelable operating leases expiring at various times through 2043, and finance leases expiring at various times through 2030.

Policy Elections & Practical Expedients

The Company has made an accounting policy election not to record leases with an initial term of twelve months or less (“short term leases”) on the balance sheet as allowed within ASC 842. Short term lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has elected to apply the practical expedient that allows for the combination of lease and non-lease components for all asset classes.

Significant Judgments

Many of our real estate leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from one to 5 years or more. To determine the expected lease term, we include any noncancelable periods within the lease agreement as well as any periods covered by an option to extend the lease if we are reasonably certain to exercise the option. The equipment leases do not typically include options for renewal but may include options for purchase at the end of the lease. We determine the likelihood of exercising the option for purchase by assessing the option price versus the estimated fair value at the end of the lease term to determine if the option price is advantageous enough that we are reasonably certain to exercise it. The depreciable life of finance lease assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term, unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise.

Lease payments include fixed payments, the exercise price of a purchase option that is reasonably certain of exercise, variable payments based on a known index, and the amount probable that the Company will owe under a residual value guarantee. Variable lease payments that are not based on a known index are not included in 2017lease payments and 2016 relatedare expensed as incurred.

The discount rate used to certaindetermine the amount of right of use assets, heldlease liabilities, and lease classification is the interest rate implicit in the lease, when known. If the rate implicit in the lease is not known, the Company will use its incremental borrowing rate defined as the interest rate swap rate that approximates the lease term plus the long-term expected spread on the $1.3 billion revolving credit facility amended as of June 29, 2022 (the “Ryerson Credit Facility”).

In June 2021, we sold and leased back a group of service center properties located in Delaware, Florida, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia for net proceeds of approximately $104 million. The total annual rent for the properties starts at approximately $6.4 million per year, with the amount increasing 1.5% annually over the 15-year lease term, including, without limitation, during any renewal term. Under the terms of the lease agreements, the Company is responsible for all taxes, insurance, and utilities and is required to adequately maintain the properties for the lease term. The lease includes two renewal options for five years each. This transaction met the requirements for sale in order to recognizeleaseback accounting under ASC 842 and ASC 606. Accordingly, the assets at their fair value less cost to sell, in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-35-43, “Property, Plant and Equipment – Other Presentation Matters.” Of the $7.5 million of impairment charges recorded in 2015, $4.6 million related to certain assets that we determined did not have a recoverable carrying value based on projected undiscounted cash flows and $2.9 million related to certain assets held for sale in order to recognize the assets at their fair value less cost to sell. The Company recognized gains on the sale of the properties, which resulted in a gain of approximately $62.5 million recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The related land and buildings were removed from property, plant, and equipment and operating lease assets classifiedand liabilities of $84.4 million, respectively, were recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

In the third quarter of 2022, a long-term operating lease commenced for a new state-of-the-art facility in Centralia, Washington. The starting annual rent is approximately $2.8 million per year, with annual increases of 2.25% over the 20-year lease term and any renewal terms. The lease includes two renewal options of five years each. Under the terms of the lease agreement, the Company is responsible for all taxes, insurance, and utilities, as held for sale of $0.5 million, zero, and $1.9 millionwell as adequately maintaining the property for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,lease term. The initial right of use asset and 2015 respectively. The Company had zero and $3.6 million of assets held for sale classified within “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” onoperating lease liability recorded in the Consolidated BalancesBalance Sheet was $51.2 million and $46.1 million, respectively, the difference of $5.1 million is related to a lease prepayment.

62


In the second quarter of 2023, a long-term operating lease commenced for a new state-of-the-art service center facility in University Park, Illinois. The starting annual rent is approximately $7.3 million per year, with annual increases of 2.2% over the 15-year and 4-month lease term. The lease includes four renewal options of five years each at fair market value. Under the terms of the lease agreement, the Company is responsible for all taxes, insurance, and property management fees. The initial right of use asset and operating lease liability recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was $99.9 million.

The following table summarizes the location and amount of lease assets and lease liabilities reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022:

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

Leases

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease assets

 

Operating lease assets

 

$

349.4

 

 

$

240.5

 

Finance lease assets

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net(a)

 

 

25.7

 

 

 

26.5

 

Total lease assets

 

 

 

$

375.1

 

 

$

267.0

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating

 

Current portion of operating lease liabilities

 

$

30.5

 

 

$

25.2

 

Finance

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

6.8

 

 

 

7.1

 

Noncurrent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating

 

Noncurrent operating lease liabilities

 

 

336.8

 

 

 

215.1

 

Finance

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

 

10.6

 

 

 

12.0

 

Total lease liabilities

 

 

 

$

384.7

 

 

$

259.4

 

(a)
Finance lease assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $16.5 million and $12.5 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

The following table summarizes the location and amount of lease expense reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021:

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Lease Expense

 

Location of Lease Expense Recognized in Income

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

Operating lease expense

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative

 

$

43.6

 

 

$

36.8

 

 

$

30.5

 

Finance lease expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of lease assets

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative

 

 

5.0

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

5.4

 

Interest on lease liabilities

 

Interest and other expense on debt

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

1.0

 

Variable lease expense

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

2.8

 

Short-term lease expense

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

2.7

 

Total lease expense

 

 

 

$

55.2

 

 

$

47.5

 

 

$

42.4

 

63


The following table presents the maturity analysis of lease liabilities at December 31, 2023:

Maturity of Lease Liabilities

 

Operating Leases(a)

 

 

Finance Leases

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

2024

 

$

41.0

 

 

$

7.1

 

2025

 

 

41.0

 

 

 

5.0

 

2026

 

 

38.5

 

 

 

3.5

 

2027

 

 

37.6

 

 

 

1.8

 

2028

 

 

36.1

 

 

 

1.4

 

After 2028

 

 

271.7

 

 

 

0.7

 

Total lease payments

 

 

465.9

 

 

 

19.5

 

Less: Interest(b)

 

 

(101.2

)

 

 

(2.1

)

Present value of lease liabilities(c)

 

$

364.7

 

 

$

17.4

 

(a)
There were no operating leases with options to extend lease terms that are reasonably certain of being exercised, and there were no legally binding lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced.
(b)
Calculated using the discount rate for each lease.
(c)
Includes the current portion of $30.5 million for operating leases and $6.8 million for finance leases. The operating lease payments are net of $2.6 million of prepayments, which are recorded within the Operating Lease Asset line of the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The following table shows the weighted-average remaining lease term and discount rate for operating and finance leases, respectively, at December 31, 2023 and 2022:

 

 

At December 31,

 

Lease Term and Discount Rate

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

12.5

 

 

 

11.7

 

Finance leases

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

3.2

 

Weighted-average discount rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

3.8

%

 

 

3.6

%

Finance leases

 

 

6.0

%

 

 

3.5

%

Information reported in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 is summarized below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Other Information

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating cash flows from operating leases

 

$

40.5

 

 

$

34.3

 

 

$

29.7

 

Operating cash flows from finance leases

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

1.0

 

Financing cash flows from finance leases

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

9.2

 

 

 

10.5

 

Assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

138.8

 

 

 

61.6

 

 

 

129.6

 

Finance leases

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

15.8

 

64


Note 6:7: Definite-Lived Intangible Assets

The following summarizes the components of definite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 20172023 and 2016:2022:

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2017

 

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2023

 

 

At December 31, 2022

 

 

Weighted Average Amortizable Life in Years

 

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

Weighted Average Amortizable Life in Years

 

 

Gross
Carrying
Amount

 

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

Gross
Carrying
Amount

 

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Amortizable intangible assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

 

13.1

 

 

$

56.9

 

 

$

(29.7

)

 

$

27.2

 

 

$

51.4

 

 

$

(25.4

)

 

$

26.0

 

 

 

13.6

 

 

$

97.3

 

 

$

(52.2

)

 

 

45.1

 

 

$

73.6

 

 

$

(47.9

)

 

$

25.7

 

Developed technology / product know-how

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

9.4

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

(3.6

)

 

 

1.2

 

Non-compete agreements

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.1

 

Trademarks

 

 

16.2

 

 

 

25.4

 

 

 

(8.6

)

 

 

16.8

 

 

 

21.8

 

 

 

(7.3

)

 

 

14.5

 

 

 

13.6

 

 

 

55.3

 

 

 

(27.6

)

 

 

27.7

 

 

 

47.6

 

 

 

(23.7

)

 

 

23.9

 

Licenses

 

 

7.0

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

0.1

 

Total definite-lived intangible assets

 

 

 

 

 

$

88.3

 

 

$

(41.4

)

 

$

46.9

 

 

$

76.1

 

 

$

(35.3

)

 

$

40.8

 

 

 

 

 

$

157.5

 

 

$

(83.8

)

 

$

73.7

 

 

$

126.2

 

 

$

(75.3

)

 

$

50.9

 

Amortization expense related to intangible assets reported in warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 20152021 was $6.1 $8.5million, $5.4$7.2 million, and $6.3$6.7 million, respectively. Included withinRefer to Note 2: Acquisitions for further information on intangible balances added related to the $6.3 million of amortization expense in 2015 is $0.2 million of impairment charges the Company recorded in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10, “Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” as the carrying amount of certain intangible assets was not recoverable and the carrying amount exceeded fair value.2023 acquisitions.


Estimated amortization expense related to intangible assets at December 31, 2017,2023, for each of the years in the five year period ending December 31, 20222028 and thereafter is as follows:

Estimated
Amortization
Expense

(In millions)

For the year ended December 31, 2024

9.5

For the year ended December 31, 2025

9.2

For the year ended December 31, 2026

9.2

For the year ended December 31, 2027

8.5

For the year ended December 31, 2028

6.7

For the years ended thereafter

30.6

 

 

Estimated

Amortization Expense

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018

 

$

6.0

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019

 

 

5.8

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020

 

 

5.5

 

For the year ended December 31, 2021

 

 

4.6

 

For the year ended December 31, 2022

 

 

4.5

 

For the years ended thereafter

 

 

20.5

 

Note 7:8: Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired. The following is a summary of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016:2022:

 

 

Cost

 

 

Accumulated

Impairment

 

 

Carrying

Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2016

 

$

111.5

 

 

$

(8.3

)

 

$

103.2

 

Acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

111.5

 

 

$

(8.3

)

 

$

103.2

 

Acquisitions

 

 

12.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

123.6

 

 

$

(8.3

)

 

$

115.3

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Accumulated
Impairment

 

 

Carrying
Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2022

 

$

132.4

 

 

$

(8.3

)

 

$

124.1

 

Acquisitions

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.1

 

Balance at December 31, 2022

 

$

137.5

 

 

$

(8.3

)

 

$

129.2

 

Acquisitions

 

 

28.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.6

 

Balance at December 31, 2023

 

$

166.1

 

 

$

(8.3

)

 

$

157.8

 

In 2017,2023, the Company recognized $12.1$26.3 million of goodwill within the USU.S. reporting unit related to both the Laserflex acquisition, which will be2023 Acquisitions, see Note 2: Acquisitions for further information. The Company also recognized $2.3 million related to purchase accounting adjustments on certain 2022 Acquisitions. There was no additional goodwill recognized in 2023 related to the Canada Reporting unit. Of the $28.6 million of goodwill recognized in 2023, $12.5 million is not deductible for income tax purposes and the Guy Metals acquisition, whichremaining $16.1 million is notfully deductible for income tax purposes.

Pursuant to ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” we review the recoverability of goodwill annually as of October 1 or whenever significant events or changes occur which might impair the recovery of recorded amounts. Based on our October 1, annual goodwill impairment test, we determined there was no goodwill impairment in 2017.2023.

65



Note 8: Restructuring and Other Charges

The following summarizes restructuring accrual activity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:

 

 

Employee

Related

Costs

 

 

Tenancy

and Other

Costs

 

 

Total

Restructuring

Costs

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Balance at January 1, 2015

 

$

 

 

$

0.7

 

 

$

0.7

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

2.5

 

Cash payments

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(1.2

)

Adjustments for pension and other post-retirement termination non-cash charges

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

Changes due to foreign currency translations

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Balance at Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

$

1.2

 

 

$

0.5

 

 

$

1.7

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

Cash payments

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(1.2

)

Reclassification

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

(Reduction)/addition to reserve

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(0.2

)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

1.3

 

 

$

1.5

 

Restructuring charges

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.8

 

Cash payments

 

 

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Reclassification

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Reduction to reserve

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

 

 

$

1.7

 

 

$

1.7

 

2017

In 2017, the Company recorded an $0.8 million charge in warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations to increase the reserve for tenancy-related costs for a facility closed in 2013. The Company paid $0.4 million in costs related to this facility closure and also reclassified an existing $0.1 million liability for future lease payments to the restructuring reserve. In addition, the Company paid $0.1 million in costs related to a facility closed in 2016. The remaining $1.7 million of tenancy-related costs are expected to be paid through 2025.

During 2017, the Company recorded a $0.2 million reduction to the reserve for employee-related costs and credited warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. This action fully utilized the remaining reserve for employee-related costs.  

2016

In 2016, the Company recorded a charge of $1.0 million related to a facility closure, which consists of tenancy-related costs, primarily future lease payments. The Company paid $0.2 million in costs related to this facility closure and reclassified an existing $0.2 million liability for future lease payments at this facility to the restructuring reserve. The Company also paid $0.3 million in costs related to a facility closed in 2013 and recorded an addition of $0.1 million to the reserve for tenancy-related costs, which was charged to warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During 2016, the Company paid $0.7 million in employee-related costs related to restructuring actions taken in the fourth quarter of 2015. The Company also recorded a $0.3 million reduction to the reserve for employee-related costs and credited warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.  

2015

In 2015, the Company recorded a charge of $2.2 million for employee costs related to expense reduction actions taken in the fourth quarter of 2015. The charge consists primarily of severance costs for 140 employees in addition to $0.2 million of non-cash pensions and other post-retirement benefit costs. During 2015, the Company paid $0.8 million in costs related to this expense reduction initiative. 

In 2015, the Company also recorded a $0.3 million charge to increase the reserve for tenancy-related costs for a facility closed in 2013. During 2015, the Company paid $0.4 million in tenancy costs related to this facility. 


Note 9: Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31, 20172023 and 2016:2022:

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Ryerson Credit Facility

 

$

433.0

 

 

$

365.0

 

Foreign debt

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

4.0

 

Other debt

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

4.0

 

Unamortized debt issuance costs and discounts

 

 

(4.7

)

 

 

(6.0

)

Total debt

 

 

436.5

 

 

 

367.0

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term foreign debt

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

4.0

 

Other short-term debt

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

1.8

 

Total long-term debt

 

$

428.3

 

 

$

361.2

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Ryerson Credit Facility

 

$

384.2

 

 

$

312.0

 

11 % Senior Secured Notes due 2022

 

 

650.0

 

 

 

650.0

 

Foreign debt

 

 

21.3

 

 

 

19.2

 

Other debt

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

 

Unamortized debt issuance costs and discounts

 

 

(13.7

)

 

 

(17.7

)

Total debt

 

 

1,045.7

 

 

 

963.5

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term foreign debt

 

 

21.3

 

 

 

19.2

 

Total long-term debt

 

$

1,024.4

 

 

$

944.3

 

The principal payments required to be made on debt during the next five fiscal years are shown below:

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018

 

$

21.3

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019

 

 

3.4

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020

 

 

0.1

 

For the year ended December 31, 2021

 

 

384.3

 

For the year ended December 31, 2022

 

 

650.2

 

For the years ended thereafter

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

For the year ended December 31, 2024

 

$

8.2

 

For the year ended December 31, 2025

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2026

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2027

 

 

433.0

 

For the year ended December 31, 2028

 

 

 

For the years ended thereafter

 

 

 

Ryerson Credit Facility

On November 16, 2016,June 29, 2022, Ryerson entered into ana fifth amendment with respect toof its $1.0 billion revolving credit facility to among other things, increase the facility size from $1.0 billion to $1.3 billion and to extend the maturity date from November 5, 2025 to June 29, 2027 (as amended, the “Ryerson Credit Facility” or “Credit Facility”),. This fifth amendment maintains the ability to reduceconvert up to $100 million of commitments under the total facility sizeRyerson Credit Facility into a “first-in, last-out” sub-facility (the “FILO Facility”). Subject to certain limitations, such conversion can be made from $1.0 billion (the “Old Credit Facility”)time to $750 million, reducetime (but no more than twice in the interest rate on outstanding borrowings by 25 basis points, reduce commitment fees on amounts not borrowed by 2.5 basis points, andaggregate) prior to extend the maturity date to November 16, 2021.that is two years after June 29, 2022.

At December 31,, 2017, 2023, Ryerson had $384.2$433.0 million of outstanding borrowings, $12$10 million of letters of credit issued, and $264$560 million available under the Ryerson Credit Facility compared to $312.0$365.0 million of outstanding borrowings, $16$16 million of letters of credit issued, and $225$826 million available at December 31, 2016. 2022. Total credit availability is limited by the amount of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and qualified cash pledged as collateral under the agreement insofar as Ryerson is subject to a borrowing base comprised of the aggregate of these three amounts, less applicable reserves. Eligible accounts receivable, at any date of determination, is comprised of the aggregate value of all accounts directly created by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, a Canadian guarantor) in the ordinary course of business arising out of the sale of goods or the rendering of services, each of which has been invoiced, with such receivables adjusted to exclude various ineligible accounts, including, among other things, those to which a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable) does not have sole and absolute title and accounts arising out of a sale to an employee, officer, director, or affiliate of a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable). Eligible inventory, at any date of determination, is comprised of the net orderly liquidation value of all inventory owned by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, a Canadian guarantor).borrower. Qualified cash consists of cash in an eligible deposit account that is subject to customary restrictions and liens in favor of the lenders.

The Ryerson Credit Facility has an allocation of $660 million to the Company’s subsidiaries in the United States and an allocation of $90 million to Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower. Amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility bear interest at (i) a rate determined by reference to (A) the base rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%0.50%, Bank of America, N.A.’sAmerica’s prime rate, and the one-month LIBOR rateTerm Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus 1.00%1.00%), or (B) a LIBORTerm SOFR rate or (ii) for Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower, (A) athe prime rate determined by reference to the Canadianor base rate (the greatesthighest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%0.50%, Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “base rate” for commercial loans in U.S. Dollars made at its “base rate”loan rate, and the 30 day LIBORTerm SOFR rate plus 1.00%1.00%), (B) the primea Term SOFR rate (the greater of Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “prime rate” for commercial(for loans made by itdenominated in Canada in Canadian Dollars and the one-month Canadian bankers’ acceptance rate plus 1.00%)Dollars), or (C) the bankers’ acceptance rate.Canadian Dollar Offered Rate (“CDOR”) (for loans denominated in Canadian Dollars). The spread over the base rate and prime rate is between 0.25%0.25% and 0.50%0.50% and the spread over the LIBOR for the bankers’ acceptancesSOFR and CDOR rates is between 1.25%1.25% and 1.50%1.50%, depending on the amount available to be borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility; provided that such spreads shall be reduced by 0.125% if the leverage ratio set forth in the most recently delivered


66


compliance certificate is less than or equal to 3.50 to 1.00. The spread with respect to the FILO Facility, if any, will be determined at the time the commitments under the Ryerson Credit Facility are converted into such FILO Facility. Ryerson also pays commitment fees on amounts not borrowed at a rate of 0.20%. Overdue amounts and all amounts owed during the existence of a default bear interest at 2%2.00% above the rate otherwise applicable thereto. Ryerson also pays commitment fees on amounts not borrowed at a rate of 0.23%.

We attempt to minimize interest rate risk exposure through the utilization of interest rate swaps, which are derivative financial instruments. In March 2017, we entered into an interest rate swap to fix interest on $150 million of our floating rate debtLoans advanced under the Ryerson CreditFILO Facility at a rate of 1.658% through March 2020. The swap has reset dates and critical terms that match our existing debt and the anticipated critical terms of future debt.may only be prepaid if all then outstanding revolving loans are repaid in full. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility including the interest rate swap was 2.8 percent6.6% and 2.2 percent5.6% at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,December 31, 2022, respectively.

Borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility are secured by first-priority liens on all of the inventory, accounts receivables, lockbox accounts, and related assets of the borrowers and the guarantors.

The Ryerson Credit Facility also contains covenants that, among other things, restrict Ryerson Holding and its restricted subsidiaries with respect to the incurrence of debt, the creation of liens, transactions with affiliates, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, and acquisitions. The Ryerson Credit Facility also requires that, if availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility declines to a certain level, Ryerson maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter, and includes defaults upon (among other things) the occurrence of a change of control ofquarter.

The Ryerson and a cross-default to other financing arrangements.

The Ryerson Credit Facility contains events of default with respect to, among other things, default in the payment of principal when due or the payment of interest, fees, and other amounts due thereunder after a specified grace period, material misrepresentations, failure to perform certain specified covenants, certain bankruptcy events, the invalidity of certain security agreements or guarantees, material judgments, and the occurrence of a change of control of Ryerson.Ryerson, and a cross-default to other financing arrangements. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility will be entitled to various remedies, including acceleration of amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility and all other actions permitted to be taken by secured creditors.

The lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility could reject a borrowing request if any event, circumstance, or development has occurred that has had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. If Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, any of the other borrowers, or any restricted subsidiaries of JT Ryerson becomes insolvent or commences bankruptcy proceedings, all amounts borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility will become immediately due and payable.

Net proceeds of short-term borrowings that are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows represent borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility with original maturities less than three months.

20222028 Notes

On May 24, 2016,July 22, 2020, JT Ryerson issued $650$500 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2028 Senior Secured Notes. The Company completed $200 million worth of repurchased and redemptions prior to 2022 and the remaining $300 million was repurchased and redeemed in 2022, bringing the balance to zero as of December 31, 2022.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, JT Ryerson completed a partial redemption of $50 million of aggregate principal amount of
the 2028 Notes at a redemption price in cash of
103.000% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to, but not including, the redemption date. On July 9, 2021, JT Ryerson completed a partial redemption of $
100 million of aggregate principal amount of the 2028 Notes at a redemption price in cash of 104.000% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. Further, on July 23, 2021, JT Ryerson completed a partial redemption of $50 million aggregate principal amount of the 2028 Notes at a redemption price in cash of 103.000% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the redemption date. The total 2021 redemptions resulted in the recognition of a $5.5 million loss within the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

During 2022, the company repurchased, redeemed, and retired the remaining 2028 Notes principal amount of $300.0 million. The total paid to repurchase the 2028 Notes during 2022 was $319.2 million. The second quarter 2022 repurchases included a completed tender offer in which $132.2 million of the 2028 Notes were tendered for $140.8 million. Including $2.1 million of debt issuance costs written off as part of the transaction, the total loss related to the tender offer was $10.7 million. In the third quarter of 2022, the Company redeemed $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 20222028 Notes (the “2022 Notes”). The 2022 Notes bear interest at a rate of 11.00% per annum. The 2022 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries that are co-borrowers or that have guarantee obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility.

The 2022 Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of JT Ryerson’s and each guarantor’s present and future assets locatedfor $51.5 million, resulting in the United States (other than receivables, inventory, cash, deposit accounts and related general intangibles, certain other assets and proceeds thereof), subject to certain exceptions and customary permitted liens.recognition of $1.5 million loss. The total 2022 Notes andrepurchases resulted in the related guarantees are also secured onrecognition of a second-priority basis by a lien on the assets that secure JT Ryerson’s and the Company’s obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility.

The 2022 Notes will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after May 15, 2019 at certain redemption prices. The redemption price for the 2022 Notes if redeemed during the twelve months beginning (i) May 15, 2019 is 105.50%, (ii) May 15, 2020 is 102.75%, and (iii) May 15, 2021 and thereafter is 100.00%. JT Ryerson may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes before May 15, 2019 at a redemption price of 100.00% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus a “make-whole” premium. In addition, JT Ryerson may redeem up to 35% of the 2022 Notes before May 15, 2019 with respect to the 2022 Notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a price equal to 111.00%, with respect to the 2022 Notes, of the principal amount thereof, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any. JT Ryerson may be required to make an offer to purchase the 2022 Notes upon the sale of assets or upon a change of control.

The 2022 Notes contain customary covenants that, among other things, limit, subject to certain exceptions, our ability, and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock, make investments, sell assets, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations, or create liens or use assets as security in other transactions. Subject to certain exceptions, JT Ryerson may only pay dividends to Ryerson Holding to the extent of 50% of future net income, once prior losses are offset. As a result of these restrictions, the restricted net assets of consolidated subsidiaries exceed 25 percent of consolidated net assets as of December 31, 2017. Restricted net assets as of December 31, 2017 were $247.2 million.


The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2022 Notes, along with borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility, were used to (i) repurchase and/or redeem in full the $569.9 million balance of JT Ryerson’s 9.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”), plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon up to, but not including, the repayment date, (ii) repurchase $95.0 million of JT Ryerson’s 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”), and (iii) pay related fees, expenses and premiums.

The Company applied the provisions of ASC 470-50, “Modifications and Extinguishments” in accounting for the issuance of the 2022 Notes, redemption of the 2017 Notes, and partial repurchase of the 2018 Notes. The evaluation of the accounting under ASC 470-50 was performed on a creditor by creditor basis in order to determine if the terms of the debt were substantially different and, as a result, whether to apply modification or extinguishment accounting. For the lenders where it was determined that the terms of the debt were not substantially different, modification accounting was applied. For the remaining lenders, extinguishment accounting was applied. In connection with this debt modification and extinguishment, the Company recorded a $16.1$21.3 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during 2016, primarily attributed to the costs incurred with third parties for arrangement fees, legal, and other services related to the modified debt, as well as redemption fees paid to the creditors, and unamortized debt issuance costs written off related to the extinguished debt. Additionally, the costs incurred with third parties for arrangement fees, legal, and other services related to the extinguished debt and redemption fees paid to the creditors related to the modified debt were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the modified debt using the effective interest method.

During the year 2016, a principal amount of $75.4 million of the 2018 Notes were repurchased for $68.0 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of an $7.4 million gain within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Including the $16.1Additional debt issuance costs of $2.6 million loss on the redemption of the $569.9 million balance of the 2017 Notesrelated to non-tender repurchases were written off and repurchase of $95.0 million of the 2018 Notes, the Company recognized a total net loss of $8.7 million within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during year 2016.interest expense.

During the year 2015, a principal amount of $30.1 million of the 2017 Notes were repurchased for $29.4 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a $0.7 million gain within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the year 2015, a principal amount of $30.1 million of the 2018 Notes were repurchased for $30.5 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a $0.4 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Foreign Debt

AtAt December 31, 2017,2023, Ryerson China’s total foreign borrowings were $21.3$5.4 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest rate of 3.7%3.4% per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment. Ryerson China had

67


additional $0.6 million debt related to letter of credit drawdowns that incur service charges (an initiation fee ranging between 0.15% and 0.30% and a redemption fee ranging from zero and 0.13% per month), rather than interest. These balances are not secured with any of Ryerson China's assets. At December 31, 2016,2022, Ryerson China’s total foreign borrowings were $19.2$4.0 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest rate of 4.4%3.6% per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment.

Availability under the Ryerson China’s credit facility was $25$42 millionand $26$44 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively. Letters of credit issued by our foreign subsidiaries totaled $3$1 million and $6$4 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.

Note 10: Employee Benefits

The Company accounts for its pension and postretirement plans in accordance with FASB ASC 715, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits” (“ASC 715”). In addition to requirements for an employer to recognize in its Consolidated Balance Sheet an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status and to recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur, ASC 715 requires an employer to measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year.

Prior to January 1, 1998, the Company’s non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (“Ryerson Pension Plan” or “RPP”) covered certain employees, retirees, and their beneficiaries. Benefits provided to participants of the plan were based on pay and years of service for salaried employees and years of service and a fixed rate or a rate determined by job grade for all wage employees, including employees under collective bargaining agreements.

Effective January 1, 1998, the Company froze the benefits accrued under its defined benefit pension plan for certain salaried employees and instituted a defined contribution plan. Effective March 31, 2000, benefits for certain salaried employees of J. M. Tull Metals Company and AFCO Metals, subsidiaries that were merged into JT Ryerson, were similarly frozen, with the employees becoming participants in the Company’s defined contribution plan. Salaried employeesEmployees who vested in their benefits accrued under the defined benefit plan at December 31, 1997 and March 31, 2000, are entitled to those benefits upon retirement.

The Company offers a defined contribution plan to eligible employees. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015,2021, expense recognized for itsthe defined contribution plans was $7.2$10.5 million, $6.9$9.4 million, and $5.9$8.9 million, respectively.


InEffective September 24, 2021, the fourth quarterRyerson Pension Plan purchased $206.6 million of 2015, we changed the method we use to estimate the service and interest componentsannuities on behalf of net periodic benefit cost for the pension and other postretirement benefits starting in 2016.  This change compared to the previous method resulted in a decrease of $8.4 million in the service and interest components for pension cost in 2016.  Historically, we estimated these service and interest cost components utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. We elected to utilize a full yield curve approach in the estimation of these components by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. We made this change to provide a more precise measurement of service and interest costs by improving the correlation between projected benefit cash flows to the corresponding spot yield curve rates. This change did not affect the measurement of our total benefit obligations. We accounted for this change as a change in accounting estimate that was inseparable from a change in accounting principle and accordingly accounted for it prospectively.

Effective May 19, 2017, the Company froze the benefits accrued under a portion of its defined benefit pension plan for certain wage employees.participants which, due to the size of the transaction, resulted in settlement accounting. The freeze impacted a significant number of active accruing participants, therefore, curtailment accounting was required, and the pension plan was remeasured as of May 31, 2017.September 30, 2021. The remeasurement resulted in a curtailmentsettlement loss of $0.1$98.3 million. As a result of the remeasurement, the discount rate increased from 2.42% to 2.80% and the expected long-term rate of return on pension assets decreased from 5.05% to 4.35%.

Central Steel and Wire Company (“CSW”), a subsidiary of JT Ryerson, also has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (“Central Steel and Wire Retirement Plan” or “CSWPP”), which covers certain employees, retirees, and their beneficiaries. CSWPP paid $2.5 million whichin lump sums and annuity purchases during 2023, $2.6 million in 2022, and $7.5 million in 2021. Because the payout was recorded within warehousing, delivery, selling, general,less than the fiscal year service cost plus interest, settlement accounting was not reflected for the years ended 2022 or 2023. Conversely, because the payouts were more than the fiscal year service cost plus interest in 2021, settlement accounting was reflected at year end resulting in a settlement loss of $0.4 million. The payouts in 2023, 2022, and administrative expense2021 are based on normal, recurring activity for the CSWPP therefore, they have been reflected within the Consolidated Statementsbenefits paid lines of Operations.  the pension obligation and pension asset rollforward table below.

Due to the in progress closure of CSW's headquarters in Chicago, IL and move to University Park, IL, a significant reduction in the future service years of employees is expected due to headcount reductions between the fourth quarter of 2023 and first quarter of 2024, triggering curtailment accounting. Since the curtailment accounting is resulting in a net gain, the gain is required to be reflected in the periods as they are realized, resulting in a curtailment gain of $0.5 million recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023 for those terminated during that period. An additional curtailment gain is expected in the first quarter of 2024 as the remaining headcount reductions occur. See Note 20: Subsequent Events for details of pension related activity occurring after December 31, 2023.

The Company’s U.S. other postretirement benefit plans include the Ryerson Postretirement Welfare Plans (“Ryerson OPEB”) and Central Steel and Wire Postretirement Medical Plan (“CSW OPEB”).

Related to the CSW move to University Park discussed above, curtailment accounting has also been applied for the CSW OPEB plan, The curtailment gain recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023 is $0.3 million, with an additional gain expected to be recognized in the first quarter of 2024.

68


The Company has other deferred employee benefit plans, including supplemental pension plans, the liability for which totaled $17.3$11.2 million and $17.0$11.4 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.

Summary of Assumptions and Activity

The tables included below provide reconciliations of benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets of the Company plans as well as the funded status and components of net periodic benefit costs for each period related to each plan. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date to determine the pension and other postretirement benefit information. The Company had an additional measurement date of May 31, 2017 for our U.S. defined pension benefitSeptember 30, 2021 due to the plan freeze discussedannuitization transaction described above. The expected rate of return on plan assets is determined based on the market-related value of the assets, recognizing any gains or losses over a four year period. The method we have chosen for amortizing actuarial gains and losses is to recognize amounts in excess of a 10% corridor (10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or plan assets) and are amortized over the average expected remaining lifetime of the participants in the pension plan and over the average expected remaining service period for the other postretirement benefits.

The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the periods and net periodic benefit costs for the Pension Benefitspension benefits for U.S. plans were as follows:

Ryerson Pension Plan

 

Year Ended December 31, 2023

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

 

January 1 to September 30, 2021

 

Discount rate for calculating obligations

 

 

5.05

%

 

 

5.28

%

 

 

2.84

%

 

 

2.80

%

Discount rate for calculating service cost

 

 

5.30

 

 

 

2.97

 

 

 

2.95

 

 

 

2.61

 

Discount rate for calculating interest cost

 

 

5.20

 

 

 

2.28

 

 

 

2.08

 

 

 

1.72

 

Expected rate of return on plan assets

 

 

6.05

 

 

 

4.85

 

 

 

4.35

 

 

 

5.05

 

Rate of compensation increase – benefit obligations

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

Rate of compensation increase – net periodic benefit cost

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

Central Steel and Wire Retirement Plan

 

Year Ended December 31, 2023

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

Discount rate for calculating obligations

 

 

5.24

%

 

 

5.45

%

 

 

3.27

%

Discount rate for calculating service cost

 

 

5.48

 

 

 

3.33

 

 

 

3.20

 

Discount rate for calculating interest cost

 

 

5.40

 

 

 

3.10

 

 

 

2.76

 

Expected rate of return on plan assets

 

 

3.80

 

 

 

1.80

 

 

 

2.05

 

Rate of compensation increase – benefit obligations

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

Rate of compensation increase – net periodic benefit cost

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

June 1 to December 31, 2017

 

 

January 1 to May 31, 2017

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

Discount rate for calculating obligations

 

 

3.64

%

 

 

3.86

%

 

 

4.14

%

 

 

4.41

%

Discount rate for calculating service cost

 

 

4.20

 

 

 

4.51

 

 

 

4.80

 

 

 

4.05

 

Discount rate for calculating interest cost

 

 

3.18

 

 

 

3.44

 

 

 

3.55

 

 

 

4.05

 

Expected rate of return on plan assets

 

 

6.95

 

 

 

6.75

 

 

 

7.10

 

 

 

7.40

 

Rate of compensation increase – benefit obligations

 

 

2.90

 

 

 

2.70

 

 

 

2.70

 

 

 

2.80

 

Rate of compensation increase – net periodic benefit cost

 

 

2.70

 

 

 

2.70

 

 

 

2.80

 

 

 

2.80

 

The expected rate of return on U.S. plan assets is 6.70%5.95% for 2018.RPP and 3.85% for CSWPP for 2024.

69


The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the periods and net periodic benefit costs for the Other Postretirement Benefits, primarily health care, for U.S. plans were as follows:

Ryerson Postretirement Welfare Plans

 

Year Ended December 31, 2023

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

Discount rate for calculating obligations

 

 

5.06

%

 

 

5.29

%

 

 

2.84

%

Discount rate for calculating service cost

 

 

5.34

 

 

 

3.08

 

 

 

2.80

 

Discount rate for calculating interest cost

 

 

5.21

 

 

 

2.22

 

 

 

1.68

 

Rate of compensation increase – benefit obligations

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

Rate of compensation increase – net periodic benefit cost

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Central Steel and Wire Postretirement Medical Plan

 

Year Ended December 31, 2023

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

Discount rate for calculating obligations

 

 

3.57

%

 

 

3.99

%

 

 

4.21

%

 

 

5.05

%

 

 

5.26

%

 

 

2.79

%

Discount rate for calculating service cost

 

 

4.25

 

 

 

4.59

 

 

 

3.80

 

 

 

5.31

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

2.68

 

Discount rate for calculating interest cost

 

 

3.19

 

 

 

3.19

 

 

 

3.80

 

 

 

5.21

 

 

 

2.16

 

 

 

1.67

 

Rate of compensation increase – benefit obligations

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

2.50

 

 

 

2.80

 

Rate of compensation increase – net periodic benefit cost

 

 

2.50

 

 

 

2.80

 

 

 

2.80

 


The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the periods and net periodic benefit costs for the Pension Benefits for Canadian plans were as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

Salaried

 

 

Bargaining

 

 

Salaried

 

 

Bargaining

 

 

Salaried

 

 

Bargaining

 

 

 

Salaried

 

 

Bargaining

 

 

Salaried

 

 

Bargaining

 

 

Salaried

 

 

Bargaining

 

 

Discount rate for calculating obligations

 

 

3.31

%

 

 

3.32

%

 

 

3.64

%

 

 

3.71

%

 

 

3.70

%

 

 

3.87

%

 

 

 

4.64

%

 

 

4.64

%

 

 

5.17

%

 

 

5.17

%

 

 

2.85

%

 

 

2.85

%

 

Discount rate for calculating net periodic benefit cost

 

 

3.64

 

 

 

3.71

 

 

 

3.70

 

 

 

3.87

 

 

 

3.80

 

 

 

3.80

 

 

 

 

5.17

 

 

 

5.17

 

 

 

2.85

 

 

 

2.85

 

 

 

2.32

 

 

 

2.34

 

 

Expected rate of return on plan assets

 

 

5.50

 

 

 

5.25

 

 

 

5.75

 

 

 

5.50

 

 

 

6.00

 

 

 

5.75

 

 

 

 

6.00

 

 

 

4.25

 

 

 

4.25

 

 

 

2.25

 

 

 

4.25

 

 

 

1.75

 

 

Rate of compensation increase

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.25

 

 

 

3.25

 

 

 

3.25

 

 

 

3.25

 

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

N/A

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

The expected rate of return on Canadian plan assets for 20182024 is 5.25%5.25% for the Ryerson Salaried Plan (approximately 79%80% of total Canadian plan assets) and 4.50%4.00% for the Ryerson Bargaining Unit Plan (approximately 21%20% of total Canadian plan assets).

The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the periods and net periodic benefit costs for the Other Postretirement Benefits, primarily healthcare, for Canadian plans were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Discount rate for calculating obligations

 

 

4.63

%

 

 

5.16

%

 

 

2.75

%

Discount rate for calculating net periodic benefit cost

 

 

5.16

 

 

 

2.75

 

 

 

2.19

 

Rate of compensation increase

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.00

 

70


 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Discount rate for calculating obligations

 

 

3.31

%

 

 

3.54

%

 

 

3.64

%

Discount rate for calculating net periodic benefit cost

 

 

3.61

 

 

 

3.64

 

 

 

3.80

 

Rate of compensation increase

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

3.25

 

 

 

3.25

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Change in Benefit Obligation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

326.3

 

 

$

429.6

 

 

$

38.4

 

 

$

59.3

 

Service cost

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.4

 

Interest cost

 

 

16.2

 

 

 

9.8

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

1.3

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

6.1

 

 

 

(88.4

)

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

(18.6

)

Effect of changes in exchange rates

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(0.6

)

Contractual and company restructuring

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Curtailment gain

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

Benefits paid (net of participant contributions and subsidies)

 

 

(26.5

)

 

 

(25.3

)

 

 

(2.0

)

 

 

(3.4

)

Medicare Part D retiree drug subsidy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

324.2

 

 

$

326.3

 

 

$

35.7

 

 

$

38.4

 

Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

318.6

 

 

$

320.6

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

Change in Plan Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year

 

$

253.3

 

 

$

333.8

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

23.9

 

 

 

(59.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employer contributions

 

 

8.8

 

 

 

6.8

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

3.4

 

Effect of changes in exchange rates

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits paid (net of participant contributions and refunds)

 

 

(26.5

)

 

 

(25.3

)

 

 

(2.0

)

 

 

(3.4

)

Plan assets at fair value at end of year

 

$

260.3

 

 

$

253.3

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Reconciliation of Amount Recognized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded status

 

$

(63.9

)

 

$

(73.0

)

 

$

(35.7

)

 

$

(38.4

)

Amounts recognized in balance sheet consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current assets

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

1.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3.0

)

 

 

(3.8

)

Non-current liabilities

 

 

(65.7

)

 

 

(74.1

)

 

 

(32.7

)

 

 

(34.6

)

Net benefit liability at the end of the year

 

$

(63.9

)

 

$

(73.0

)

 

$

(35.7

)

 

$

(38.4

)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Change in Benefit Obligation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

803

 

 

$

846

 

 

$

74

 

 

$

82

 

Service cost

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest cost

 

 

26

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

41

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(4

)

Effect of changes in exchange rates

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Lump sums paid

 

 

(23

)

 

 

(28

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits paid (net of participant contributions and

   Medicare subsidy)

 

 

(54

)

 

 

(55

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(8

)

Benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

797

 

 

$

803

 

 

$

69

 

 

$

74

 

Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

795

 

 

$

801

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

Change in Plan Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year

 

$

587

 

 

$

608

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

97

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employer contributions

 

 

22

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

8

 

Effect of changes in exchange rates

 

 

3

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lump sums paid

 

 

(23

)

 

 

(28

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits paid (net of participant contributions)

 

 

(54

)

 

 

(55

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(8

)

Plan assets at fair value at end of year

 

$

632

 

 

$

587

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Reconciliation of Amount Recognized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded status

 

$

(165

)

 

$

(216

)

 

$

(69

)

 

$

(74

)

Amounts recognized in balance sheet consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

(7

)

 

$

(7

)

Non-current liabilities

 

 

(165

)

 

 

(216

)

 

 

(62

)

 

 

(67

)

Net benefit liability at the end of the year

 

$

(165

)

 

$

(216

)

 

$

(69

)

 

$

(74

)


Canadian benefit obligations represented $46$34.1 million and $32.8 million of the Company’s total Pension Benefits obligations at December 31, 20172023 and $44 million at December 31, 2016.2022, respectively. Canadian plan assets represented $44$35.9 million and $34.0 million of the Company’s total plan assets at fair value at December 31, 20172023 and $39 million at December 31, 2016.2022, respectively. In addition, Canadian benefit obligations represented $12$5.7 million of the Company’s total Other Benefits obligation at December 31, 20172023 and $11 million at2022.

The pension benefit obligations recorded as of December 31, 2016.

The2023 and 2022 were impacted by changes in assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2023 the pension benefit obligation increased by $47$7.6 million due to a decrease in the year over year discount rate and decreased $5by $2.5 million duringdue to updated mortality tables. During the year ended December 31, 2017 due to updated mortality rates based on updated mortality tables released by2022 the Society of Actuaries in 2017, and decreased an additional $4 million due to the demographic assumption studies concluded in 2017. The pension benefit obligation decreased $11by $89.3 million duringdue to an increase in the year ended December 31, 2016discount rate and increased by $6.3 million due to updated mortality rates based on updated mortality tables released bydemographic information for the Society of Actuaries in 2016 and increased by $26 million due to a decreaseparticipants in the year over year discount rate.  plan.

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 consist of the following:

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other
   comprehensive income (loss), pre–tax, consist of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss (gain)

 

$

143.6

 

 

$

149.0

 

 

$

(49.2

)

 

$

(54.7

)

Net loss (gain)

 

$

143.6

 

 

$

149.0

 

 

$

(49.2

)

 

$

(54.7

)

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other

   comprehensive income (loss), pre–tax, consist of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss (gain)

 

$

372

 

 

$

400

 

 

$

(57

)

 

$

(64

)

Prior service cost (credit)

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

(9

)

 

 

(12

)

Net loss (gain)

 

$

372

 

 

$

401

 

 

$

(66

)

 

$

(76

)

71


Net actuarial losses of $15.3 million and prior service costs of $0.1 million for pension benefits and net actuarial gains of $7.3 million and prior service credits of $3.1 million for other postretirement benefits are expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost in 2018.

Amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 consist of the following:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Amounts recognized in other comprehensive

   income (loss), pre–tax, consist of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss (gain)

 

$

(15

)

 

$

15

 

 

$

(1

)

 

$

(4

)

Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(13

)

 

 

8

 

 

 

8

 

Amortization of prior service cost (credit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Net loss (gain)

 

$

(29

)

 

$

2

 

 

$

10

 

 

$

7

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Amounts recognized in other comprehensive
   income (loss), pre–tax, consist of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial gain

 

$

(1.8

)

 

$

(15.4

)

 

$

(3.0

)

 

$

(18.4

)

Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)

 

 

(4.3

)

 

 

(8.0

)

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

5.8

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

Curtailment charge

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

Net gain (loss)

 

$

(5.6

)

 

$

(23.4

)

 

$

5.6

 

 

$

(12.5

)

For benefit obligation measurement purposes for Ryerson U.S. plans at December 31, 2017,2023, the annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits for participants under 65 was 7.07.1 percent, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026,2032, the level at which it is expected to remain. At December 31, 2017, theThe rate for participants over 65 was 7.07.5 percent grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026, plus a risk adjustment of 0.65 percent grading down to zero percent in 2022, the level at which it is expected to remain.2032. For measurement purposes for U.S. plans at December 31, 2016,2022, the annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits for participants under 65 was 6.757.3 percent, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026,2031, the level at which it is expected to remain. At December 31, 2016, theThe rate for participants over 65 was 107.8 percent grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026, plus a risk adjustment of 0.65 percent grading down to zero percent in 2022, the level at which it is expected to remain.2031.

For benefit obligation measurement purposes for Canadian plans, at both December 31, 2017,2023 and December 31, 2022, the annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was 7.3ranged from 4.5 to 4.9 percent per annum, grading up to a range of 5.3 to 5.6 percent in 2026, and then down to 4.54.1 percent in 2033,2040, the level at which it is expected to remain. For benefit obligation measurement purposes for Canadian plans at December 31, 2016, the annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was 7.5 percent per annum, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2033, the level at which it is expected to remain.


The components of the Company’s net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 20152021 are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Components of net periodic benefit cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

 

$

1

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

2

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1.7

 

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

3.5

 

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

0.5

 

Interest cost

 

 

26

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

16.2

 

 

 

9.8

 

 

 

11.1

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

1.1

 

Expected return on assets

 

 

(42

)

 

 

(45

)

 

 

(48

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16.4

)

 

 

(13.3

)

 

 

(20.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized actuarial loss (gain)

 

 

15

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

14.0

 

 

 

(8.3

)

 

 

(5.9

)

 

 

(6.0

)

Amortization of prior service credit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Curtailment loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractual termination benefits expense

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settlement expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

98.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Curtailment gain

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost (credit)

 

$

 

 

$

(2

)

 

$

6

 

 

$

(8

)

 

$

(8

)

 

$

(6

)

 

$

5.4

 

 

$

7.3

 

 

$

106.6

 

 

$

(6.5

)

 

$

(4.3

)

 

$

(4.9

)

The assumed health care cost trend rate has an effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. For purposes of determining net periodic benefit cost for U.S plans, the annual rate of increase in the per capitalcapita cost of covered health care benefits for pre-65 and post-65 participants under 65 was 6.757.3 percent and 7.8 percent, respectively, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026, the level at which it is expected to remain. The rate for participants over 65 was 10.0 percent, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026, plus a risk adjustment of 0.65 percent grading down to zero percent in 2022,2031, the level at which it is expected to remain. For purposes of determining net periodic benefit cost for Canadian plans, the annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was 7.48ranged from 4.5 to 4.9 percent per annum, grading up to a range of 5.3 to 5.6 percent in 2026, and then down to 4.54.1 percent in 2033,2040, the level at which it is expected to remain.

A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:

 

 

1% increase

 

 

1% decrease

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Effect on service cost plus interest cost

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

(0.1

)

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

(2.8

)

Pension Trust Assets

The expected long-term rate of return on pension trust assets is 4.50%3.85% to 6.70%5.95% based on the historical investment returns of the trust, the forecasted returns of the asset classes, and a survey of comparable pension plan sponsors.

72


The Company’s pension trust weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, by asset category arewere as follows:

 

Trust Assets at

December 31,

 

 

Trust Assets at
December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

Equity securities

 

 

57

%

 

 

62

%

 

 

31

%

 

 

30

%

Debt securities

 

 

26

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

51

 

Real Estate

 

 

5

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

12

 

Other

 

 

12

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

7

 

Total

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

The Board of Directors of JT Ryerson has general supervisory authority over the Pension Trust Fund and approves the investment policies and plan asset target allocation. Anallocations are established by Ryerson’s internal management committeeEmployee Benefits Committee, as delegated by the Board of Directors, in consultation with investment advisors. The Employee Benefits Committee provides on-going oversight of the plan assets in accordance with the approved policies and asset allocation ranges and has the authority to appoint and dismiss investment managers. The investment policy objectives are to maximize long-termseek a competitive rate of return relative to an appropriate level of risk depending on the funded status of each plan and the timing of expected benefit payments. As plan funded status improves, the asset allocations will move along a predetermined, de-risking glide path that reallocates capital from a diversified pool ofgrowth assets while minimizing the risk of large lossesto fixed income assets in order to preserve asset gains and to maintain adequate liquidity to permit timely payment of all benefits. The policies include diversification requirements and restrictions on concentration in any one single issuer or asset class.reduce funded status volatility. The currently approved asset investment classes are cash, fixed income, domestic equities, international equities, real estate, private equities, and hedge funds of funds. Company management allocates the plan assets among the

The approved investment classes and provides appropriate directions to the investment managers pursuant to such allocations.


The approvedweighted-average target ranges and allocations as of the December 31, 20172023 measurement date were as follows:

Range

Target

Equity securities

23-66%0-39%

5930

%

Debt securities

20-6450-100

2857

Real estate

1-70-11

69

Other

6-140-6

74

Total

100

%

Fair Value Measurements

To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, FASB ASC 820 "Fair Value Measurement" ("ASC 820") establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels as follows:

1.
Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the reporting date.
2.
Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data.
3.
Level 3 – unobservable inputs, such as internally-developed pricing models for the asset or liability due to little or no market activity for the asset or liability.

73


The fair value of our pension plan assets at December 31, 20172023 by asset category are as follows. See Note 15 for the definitions of Level 1, 2, and 3 fair value measurements.follows:

 

Fair Value Measurements at

December 31, 2017

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2023

 

Asset Category

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

(In millions)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

15

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

8.4

 

 

$

8.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US large cap

 

 

89

 

 

 

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

 

 

 

26.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

26.5

 

 

 

 

US small/mid cap

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.9

 

 

 

 

Canadian large cap

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

Canadian small cap

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

International companies

 

 

146

 

 

 

 

 

 

146

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.0

 

 

 

 

Global companies

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.4

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment grade debt

 

 

161

 

 

 

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

 

 

 

134.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

134.8

 

 

 

 

Other types of investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity funds

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

Multi-strategy funds

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

Non investment grade debt

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

Investments valued at net asset value

 

 

53

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

632

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

564

 

 

$

 

 

$

260.3

 

 

$

8.4

 

 

$

217.4

 

 

$

 

The fair value of our pension plan assets at December 31, 20162022 by asset category are as follows:

 

Fair Value Measurements at

December 31, 2016

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2022

 

Asset Category

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

(In millions)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

15

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

6.2

 

 

$

6.2

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US large cap

 

 

101

 

 

 

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

 

 

 

24.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

24.3

 

 

 

 

US small/mid cap

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

 

Canadian large cap

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

Canadian small cap

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

International companies

 

 

134

 

 

 

 

 

 

134

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.9

 

 

 

 

Global companies

 

 

90

 

 

 

 

 

 

90

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.9

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment grade debt

 

 

122

 

 

 

 

 

 

122

 

 

 

 

 

 

129.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

129.3

 

 

 

 

Other types of investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity funds

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

Multi-strategy funds

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

Non investment grade debt

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

Investments valued at net asset value

 

 

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

587

 

 

$

15

 

 

$

514

 

 

$

 

 

$

253.3

 

 

$

6.2

 

 

$

208.4

 

 

$

 

The pension assets classified as Level 2 investments in both 20172023 and 2016 are2022 were part of common collective trust investments.

Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy in accordance with ASU 2015-07. The fair value amounts presented above are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented2015-07,Disclosures for Investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).”

Securities listed on one or more national securities exchanges are valued at their last reported sales price on the date of valuation. If no sale occurred on the valuation date, the security is valued at the mean of the last “bid” and “ask” prices on the valuation date. Corporate and government bonds which are not listed or admitted to trading on any securities exchanges are valued at the average mean of the last bid and ask prices on the valuation date based on quotations supplied by recognized quotation services or by reputable broker dealers. The non-publicly traded securities, other securities, or instruments for which reliable market quotations are not available are valued at each investment manager’s discretion. Valuations will depend on facts and circumstances known as of the valuation date and application of certain valuation methods.

Contributions

The Company contributed $21.7$8.8 million, $22.1$6.8 million, and $42.5$23.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015,2021, respectively, to improve the funded status of the plans. The Company anticipates that it will have a minimum required pension contribution funding of approximately $28$11.0 million in 2018.2024.

74


Estimated Future Benefit Payments

 

 

Pension

Benefits

 

 

Other

Benefits

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

2018

 

$

53

 

 

$

7

 

2019

 

 

53

 

 

 

6

 

2020

 

 

53

 

 

 

6

 

2021

 

 

53

 

 

 

5

 

2022

 

 

52

 

 

 

5

 

2023-2027

 

 

249

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

Pension
Benefits

 

 

Other
Benefits

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

2024

 

$

33

 

 

$

3

 

2025

 

 

27

 

 

 

3

 

2026

 

 

27

 

 

 

3

 

2027

 

 

27

 

 

 

3

 

2028

 

 

27

 

 

 

3

 

2029-2033

 

 

126

 

 

 

14

 

Multiemployer Pension and Other Postretirement Plans

We participate in two multiemployer pension plans covering 4826 employees at 4 locations.3 locations. Total contributions to the plans were $0.4$0.2 million,$0.3 million, and $0.4 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015.2021, respectively. Our contributions represent less than 5%5% of the total contributions to the plans. The Company maintains positive employee relations at all locations. During 2012, the Company exited and reentered the pension plan at one of the covered locations in an effort to reduce the overall pension liability. The transaction resulted in a withdrawal liability of $1.0$1.0 million, which will be paid over a period of 25 years. The balance of the withdrawal liability was $0.4 million as of both December 31, 20172023 and 2016 was $0.5 million.2022. The Company’s participation in these plans is not material to our financial statements.

Note 11: Stock-Based Compensation

Under the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”), as amended, which is the Company’s only equity compensation plan, we may grant stock options and other equity-based awards, including RSUs and PSUs, to certain employees. At December 31, 2023, an aggregate of 2,152,464 shares were authorized for future grant. Awards that expire or are forfeited without delivery of shares generally become available for future issuance under the plan. As stock options are exercised, and RSUs and PSUs vest, we issue new shares of Ryerson common stock. In the third quarter of 2023, we began quarterly share grants that vest immediately to our Board of Directors as part of their compensation, resulting in 900 shares of common stock being issued during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Compensation expense for stock options, RSUs, and PSUs is recognized ratably over the service period of the award and reflects forfeitures as they occur. Compensation expense for RSUs and PSUs is based on the market price of the shares underlying the awards on the grant date, and further for PSUs, reflects the estimated level of performance condition attainment.

Compensation expense and total recognized tax benefit related to stock options, RSUs, and PSUs are as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Stock-based compensation expense, pre-tax

 

$

13.8

 

 

$

9.1

 

 

$

5.5

 

Tax benefit recognized in earnings

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

(1.3

)

On March 31, 2021, the Company granted 125,000 market condition options to certain employees under the 2014 Plan. The options are subject to a graded vesting schedule over a four-year period provided two vesting conditions are both satisfied on each applicable vesting date, with a fifth year catch up provision that allows for vesting if any of the four individual vesting tranche conditions are not met. Once vested, the employee can exercise the option in exchange for one share of the Company’s common stock. Options expire 10 years from the grant date, or generally within 90 days of employee termination. Options, whether vested or unvested, do not participate in dividends.

The fair value of options is estimated based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The Monte Carlo simulation considers variables such as volatility, dividend yield, risk-free rate, and the expected exercise multiple in computing the value of the options. No stock options

75


were granted in 2022 or 2023. The fair value of the stock options granted in 2021 is between $0.92 and $10.50 per share, differing at each vesting tranche.

The assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation were as follows:

2021

Risk-free rate

1.73

%

Expected volatility

73.9

%

Dividend yield

Exercise multiple

2.8x

Stock option activity under the plan is as follows:

 

 

Option Shares (in thousands)

 

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

 

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)

 

 

Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2023

 

 

123.7

 

 

$

16.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Exercised

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

16.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Terminated

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

16.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2023

 

 

120.7

 

 

$

16.50

 

 

 

7.25

 

 

$

2.2

 

Vested and Exercisable at December 31, 2023

 

 

35.0

 

 

$

16.50

 

 

 

7.25

 

 

$

0.6

 

In 2023, 2022, and 2021, we granted 213,775, 199,853, and 168,700 RSUs, and 293,150, 276,850, and 251,150 PSUs, respectively, to certain employees. Each RSU and PSU consists of the right to receive one share of our common stock. RSUs also have dividend equivalent rights equal to the accrued cash dividends where the record date for such dividends is after the grant date but before the shares vest. All rights under RSUs and PSUs are generally forfeited upon employee termination. The Company’s RSU awards vest in three separate and equal tranches over a three-year period. PSUs cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to achieving performance conditions. Each tranche vests annually on March 31, following the date of grant. RSUs and PSUs are measured based on the fair value of the underlying stock on the grant date. The statutory tax on the value of common stock shares issued to employees upon vesting is either paid through the sale of registered shares of our common stock or funded with cash.

The fair value of the 2023, 2022, and 2021 RSUs and PSUs granted was $36.38, $35.02, and $17.04 per share, respectively, determined by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date.

A summary of the status of our unvested RSUs and PSUs as of December 31, 2023 and changes during the year then ended is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares (in thousands)

 

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit

 

 

Aggregate Fair Value (in millions)

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested at January 1, 2023

 

 

358

 

 

$

25.12

 

 

 

 

Granted (1)

 

 

214

 

 

 

36.19

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

(173

)

 

 

20.30

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(5

)

 

 

31.80

 

 

 

 

Unvested at December 31, 2023

 

 

394

 

 

$

33.15

 

 

$

13.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance Stock Units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested at January 1, 2023

 

 

740

 

 

$

20.31

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

293

 

 

 

36.38

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

(217

)

 

 

5.32

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(6

)

 

 

29.64

 

 

 

 

Unvested at December 31, 2023

 

 

810

 

 

$

30.06

 

 

$

28.1

 

(1) The RSU shares granted line includes dividend shares declared after the grant date that will vest with their respective RSU tranche.

The total fair value of RSUs and PSUs vested during 2023, 2022, and 2021 was $14.2 million, $13.0 million, and $6.1 million, respectively.

76


As of December 31, 2023, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs, PSUs, and stock options was $5.3 million, $.12.3 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years for RSUs, 1.9 years for PSUs, and 1.3 years for stock options.

In 2023, 2022, and 2021, we made payments of $3.2 million, $2.7 million, and zero, respectively, to tax authorities on our employees’ behalf for shares withheld related to net share settlements. Withholding related to this remittance is reflected in the stock-based compensation expense, net caption of our consolidated statements of stockholders' equity.

Note 11:12: Commitments and Contingencies

LeasePurchase Obligations & Other

The Company leases buildings and equipment under noncancellable operating leases expiring in various years through 2027. Future minimum rental commitments are estimated to total $89.7 million, including approximately $20.5 million in 2018, $18.4 million in 2019, $14.7 million in 2020, $12.3 million in 2021, $9.0 million in 2022, and $14.8 million thereafter.

Rental expense under operating leases totaled $28.5 million, $30.0 million, and $31.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

The Company leases equipment under capital leases expiring in various years through 2022. Future minimum rental commitments are estimated to total $36.5 million, including approximately $11.9 million in 2018, $10.7 million in 2019, $8.3 million in 2020, $3.9 million in 2021, and $1.7 million in 2022.


To fulfill contractual requirements for certain customers, in 2017, the Company has entered into certain fixed-pricefixed price noncancellable contractual obligations. TheseAt December 31, 2023, these purchase obligations aggregated to $32.0$20.4 million at December 31, 2017 with $32.0 million to be paiddue in 2018. 2024.

Concentrations of Various Risks

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, available-for-sale investments, derivative instruments, accounts payable, and notes payable.long-term debt. In the case of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, and long-term debt, the carrying amount on the balance sheet approximates the fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The available-for-sale investments in common stockunderlying borrowings on the Ryerson Credit Facility are adjustedtypically for terms of 30 to fair value each period with unrealized gains and losses recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income.60 days. The derivative instruments are marked to market each period. The fair value of notes payable is disclosed inperiod, see Note 15.14: Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements.

The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of derivative financial instruments and trade accounts receivable. Our derivative financial instruments are contracts placed with major financial institutions. Credit is generally extended to customers based upon an evaluation of each customer’s financial condition, with terms consistent in the industry and no collateral required. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of customers and their dispersion across geographic areas.areas and industries.

The Company has signed supply agreements with certain vendors which may obligate the Company to make cash deposits based on the spot price of aluminum at the end of each month. These cash deposits offset amounts payable to the vendor when inventory is received. We made no cash deposits for the year ended December 31, 2017. We have no exposure as of December 31, 2017.

Approximately 10%8% of our total labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. There are collective bargaining agreements that will expire in fiscal 2018,2024, which covers 3%cover 3% of our total labor force. We believe that our overall relationship with our employees is good.

Litigation

In October 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) named usJT Ryerson as one of more than 100 businesses that may be a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (the “PHS Site”). On January 6,In 2017, the EPA issued an initialits Record of Decision (“ROD”) regardingfor the site. The ROD includessite, which provides for a combination of dredging, capping, and enhanced natural recovery that would take approximately thirteen years to construct plus additional time for monitored natural recovery, at an estimated present value cost of $1.05$1.05 billion. A final allocation of costs of remediation among the various PRPs is not anticipated until 2025. All dates included herein are subject to change.

There are sixteen project areas identified within the PHS Site; JT Ryerson’s identification as a PRP relates to its past operations within two of those project areas: (1) the “Burgard Way” site, which is a subset of the River Mile 3.5 East (“RM3.5E”) Project Area and (2) the “Basin Avenue” site, which is a subset of the Swan Island Basin Project Area.

One hundred percent of the PHS Site is currently in the active remedial design phase, with plans being developed by various members of the Portland Harbor Participation and Common Interest Group (“PCI Group”). Neither the EPA nor any other party has asked JT Ryerson to participate in the remedial design phase. Schnitzer Steel is developing the remedial design plan for the RM3.5E area. Schnitzer Steel has indicated that JT Ryerson was not a significant contributor of any contaminants of concern. In its advocacy briefing filed in late 2023, Schnitzer proposed that JT Ryerson be allocated 1.31% of the costs related to the RM3.5E Project Area; however, none of the other four parties that filed advocacy briefs for the area proposed any allocation to JT Ryerson. No party has proposed any allocation to JT Ryerson for the Swan Island Basin Project Area. At present, remedial action for the project areas potentially involving JT Ryerson is anticipated to begin in 2033 or 2034.

The Allocation Team of the PCI Group will prepare a proposed Joint Preliminary Allocation Report (“JPAR”) relating to the allocation of costs among the PRPs. The current timeline projects that the final JPAR should be issued by the end of 2024, at which

77


point a six-month mediation period will commence. All PRPs, including JT Ryerson, are expected to participate in this mediation process, during which the PRPs will attempt to agree on a final cost allocation.

The EPA has now requestedset forth its desire for a Pre-Remedial Design Reportsingle overarching consent decree to be negotiated and signed by all settling parties over the next two to three years. This decree would include implementation of the various proposed remedial design plans, sequencing, and payment of costs for all work to be done at the site, and site-wide covenants not to sue. The EPA has also indicated that it anticipates that Special Notice Letters (“Pre-RD”SNL”), which give PRPs information as to help determine ifwhy the ROD is appropriate or should be reduced.  The Pre-RD is due on May 9, 2019, and a revised ROD shouldEPA thinks they are liable as well as clean-up plans, will be issued sometime thereafter. to PRPs prior to the finalization of the consent decree; however, there is currently no set timeline for the decree or SNLs.

The EPA has stated that it is willing to consider de minimis settlements, which JT Ryerson is trying to pursue; however, the EPA has stated that it does not intend to begin those considerations until after the remedial design work is completed and the SNLs are issued. It has met with selected parties that we believe to be larger targets.

As the EPA has not yet allocated responsibility for the contamination among the potentially responsible parties, including JT Ryerson. WeRyerson, we do not currently have sufficient information available to us to determine whether the ROD will be executed as currently stated, whether and to what extent JT Ryerson may be held responsible for any of the identified contamination, and how much (if any) of the final plan’s costs might ultimately be allocated to JT Ryerson. Therefore, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or estimate a range of potential loss at this time.

There are various other claims and pending actions against the Company. The amount of liability, if any, for those claims and actions atas of December 31, 20172023 is not determinable but, in the opinion of management, such liability, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. We maintain liability insurance coverage to assist in protecting our assets from losses arising from or related to activities associated with business operations.

Note 12: Related Parties

JT Ryerson, one of our subsidiaries, was party to a corporate advisory services agreement with Platinum Advisors, an affiliate of Platinum, pursuant to which Platinum Advisors provided JT Ryerson certain business, management, administrative, and financial advice. On July 23, 2014, JT Ryerson’s Board of Directors approved the termination of this services agreement contingent on the closing of the initial public offering of Ryerson Holding common stock, which occurred on August 13, 2014. As consideration for terminating the advisory fee payable thereunder, Platinum Advisors and its affiliates were paid $15.0 million in August 2014, with an additional $10.0 million paid in August 2015. The Company recognized the $25.0 million termination fee within Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense during the third quarter of 2014.


Note 13: Segment Information

We have one operating and reportable segment, metals service centers.

The Company derives substantially all of its sales from the distribution of metals. The following table showsSee Note 16: Revenue Recognition for the Company’s percentage of sales by major product line:line.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Product Line

 

(Percentage of Sales)

 

Carbon Steel Flat

 

 

28

%

 

 

28

%

 

 

25

%

Carbon Steel Plate

 

 

10

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

11

 

Carbon Steel Long

 

 

12

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

16

 

Stainless Steel Flat

 

 

18

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

16

 

Stainless Steel Plate

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Stainless Steel Long

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Aluminum Flat

 

 

15

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

Aluminum Plate

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Aluminum Long

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

4

 

Other

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Total

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

No customer, including their subcontractors, accounted for more than 28 percent of Company sales for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015.2021. The top ten customers accounted for less than 1216 percent of itsour sales for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015.2021. A significant majority of the Company’s sales are attributable to its U.S. operations and a significant majority of its long-lived assets are located in the United States.U.S. The only operations attributed to foreign countries relate to the Company’s subsidiaries in Canada, China, and Mexico, which in aggregate comprised 12 percent, 13 percent, and 13 percent of the Company’s sales during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Canadian, Chinese, and Mexican long-lived assets were 7 percent of total Company long-lived assets at December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.Mexico.

The following tables summarize consolidated financial information of our operations by geographic location based on where sales originated from:or where the assets are held:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Sales

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

United States

 

$

4,642.3

 

 

 

91

%

 

$

5,765.0

 

 

 

91

%

 

$

5,123.7

 

 

 

90

%

Foreign countries

 

 

466.4

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

558.6

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

551.6

 

 

 

10

%

Total

 

$

5,108.7

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

6,323.6

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

5,675.3

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

At December 31,

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

United States

 

$

890.9

 

 

 

95

%

 

$

657.7

 

 

 

94

%

 

$

557.8

 

 

 

93

%

Foreign countries

 

 

48.1

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

41.2

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

41.6

 

 

 

7

%

Total

 

$

939.0

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

698.9

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

599.4

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Net Sales

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

United States

 

$

2,962.4

 

 

$

2,485.9

 

 

$

2,770.3

 

Foreign countries

 

 

402.3

 

 

 

373.8

 

 

 

396.9

 

Total

 

$

3,364.7

 

 

$

2,859.7

 

 

$

3,167.2

 

78


 

 

At December 31,

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

United States

 

$

395.3

 

 

$

362.5

 

 

$

373.9

 

Foreign countries

 

 

27.6

 

 

 

25.7

 

 

 

26.4

 

Total

 

$

422.9

 

 

$

388.2

 

 

$

400.3

 


Note 14: Other Matters

Equity Investment

In 2011 Ryerson acquired a 38 percent equity interest in Automated Laser Fabrication Co., LLC (“ALF”). ALF is a steel processing company located in Streetsboro, Ohio. The Company accounts for this investment under the equity method of accounting. The Company’s investment in this joint venture is not considered material to the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Liquidation of Investment in Foreign Entity

On February 17, 2012, the Company acquired 50 percent of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Açofran Aços e Metais Ltda (“Açofran”), a long products distributor located in São Paulo, Brazil. The Company fully consolidated Açofran based on voting control. The Company was party to a put option arrangement with respect to the securities that represent the noncontrolling interest of Açofran. The put was exercisable by the minority shareholders outside of the Company’s control by requiring the Company to redeem the minority shareholders’ equity stake in the subsidiary at a put price based on earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization expense, and net debt. The redeemable noncontrolling interest was classified as mezzanine equity and measured at the greater of estimated redemption value at the end of each reporting period or the historical cost basis of the noncontrolling interest adjusted for earnings and foreign currency allocations.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company substantially liquidated its investment in Acofran. In accordance with ASC 830-30-40, “Foreign Currency Matters,” the Company reclassified the $1.2 million accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment loss on the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity to Other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during 2016.

Note 15:14: Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements

Derivatives

The Company is exposedmay use derivatives to certain risks relatingpartially offset its business exposure to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments arecommodity price, foreign currency, and interest rate risk,fluctuations and their related impact on expected future cash flows and certain existing assets and liabilities. However, the Company may choose not to hedge certain exposures for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, Company policy, accounting considerations, or the prohibitive economic cost of hedging particular exposures. There can be no assurance the hedges will offset more than a portion of the financial impact resulting from movements in commodity pricing, foreign currency risk, and commodity price risk.exchange, or interest rates. Interest rate swaps aremay be entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with the Company’s floating-rate borrowings. We use foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge variability in cash flows in our Canada, Mexico, and China operations when a payment currency is different from our functional currency. From time to time, we may enter into fixed price sales contracts with our customers for certain of our inventory components. We may enter into metal commodity futures and options contracts to reduce volatility in the price of these metals. We may also enter into fixed price natural gas contracts and diesel fuel price swapsderivative contracts to manage the price risk of forecasted purchases of natural gas and diesel fuel.

WeAt times we may have a receive variable, pay fixed, interest rate swapswaps to manage the exposure to variable interest rates of the Ryerson Credit Facility. In March 2017,June 2019, we entered into a forward agreement for $150$60 million of “pay fixed” interest at 1.658%, “receive variable”1.729% through June 2022 and in November 2019, we entered into a forward agreement for $100 million of “pay fixed” interest to manageat 1.539% through November 2022. In August 2022, we terminated our $100 million forward agreement, therefore, no interest rate swaps remained outstanding as of December 31, 2023 or December 31, 2022. Upon entering into these swaps, the risk of increasing variable interest rates.  The interest rate reset dates and critical terms matchmatched the terms of our existing debt and anticipated critical terms of future debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility. TheFacility; however, this was no longer the case once the Ryerson Credit Facility was amended on November 5, 2020. As such, effective November 1, 2020 the Company de-designated its interest rate swaps and terminated its hedge accounting treatment. Prior to de-designation, the Company marked these interest rate swaps to market with changes in fair value being recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. Subsequent to de-designation, changes in fair value were recorded in current earnings. The unrealized loss as of the de-designation date remained in accumulated other comprehensive income and was amortized into earnings as the forecasted interest rate swap aspayments affected earnings.

In the fourth quarter of December 31, 20172020, in connection with the redemption options under the 2028 Notes, the Company recorded an embedded derivative in other current assets on its Consolidated Balance Sheet, with changes in value recorded within other income and (expense), net within the Consolidated Statements of Operations. When the 2028 Notes were fully redeemed and repurchased in 2022, the embedded derivative value was an asset of $1.0 million.adjusted to zero.

The Company currently does not account for its commodity contracts and foreign exchange derivative contracts as hedges but rather marks them to market with a corresponding offset to current earnings. The Company accounts for its interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of floating-rate borrowings with changes in fair value being recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.

The Company regularly reviews the creditworthiness of its derivative counterparties and does not expect to incur a significant loss from the failure of any counterparties to perform under any agreements.


The following table summarizes the location and fair value amount of our derivative instruments reported in our Consolidated Balance SheetSheets as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016:

 

 

Asset Derivatives

 

 

Liability Derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metal commodity contracts

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

$

3.9

 

 

$

0.2

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

Deferred charges and other assets

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

Taxes and other credits

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives

 

 

 

$

3.9

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

 

 

$

3.9

 

 

$

0.2

 

2022. As of December 31, 20172023, and 2016 the Company’s foreign currency exchange contracts had a U.S. dollar notional amount of $5.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2022, all derivative instruments held by the Company had 453 tonswere subject to master netting arrangements with various financial institutions. The Company’s accounting policy is to not offset these positions in its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The gross derivative assets and 296 tons, respectively,liabilities presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets offset to a net asset of nickel swap contracts related to forecasted purchases. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had 5,252 tons and 11,998 tons, respectively, of hot roll coil swap contracts related to forecasted purchases. The Company has aluminum swap contracts related to forecasted purchases, which had a notional amount of 15,102 tons and 8,466 tons$7.9 million as of December 31, 20172023, and 2016, respectively. Asa net liability of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has zero gallons and 39,000 gallons, respectively, of diesel fuel swap contracts related to forecasted purchases. The Company had 3,402 tons and zero tons of zinc contracts$3.5 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  As2022, when incorporating the effects of master netting arrangements.

 

 

Asset Derivatives

 

 

Liability Derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

December 31, 2023

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

Balance Sheet Location

 

December 31, 2023

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metal commodity contracts

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

$

12.7

 

 

$

8.5

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

$

4.8

 

 

$

12.1

 

Diesel fuel commodity contracts

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives

 

 

 

$

12.7

 

 

$

8.6

 

 

 

 

$

4.8

 

 

$

12.1

 

79


The following table presents the volume of the Company’s activity in derivative instruments as of December 31, 2017, the Company had a notional amount of $150 million of the Ryerson Credit Facility hedged by an interest rate swap.   2023 and 2022:

 

 

Notional Amount

 

 

 

Derivative Instruments

 

At December 31, 2023

 

 

At December 31, 2022

 

 

Unit of Measurement

Hot roll coil swap contracts

 

 

64,819

 

 

 

40,036

 

 

Tons

Aluminum swap contracts

 

 

20,319

 

 

 

21,116

 

 

Tons

Nickel swap contracts

 

 

1,375

 

 

 

1,525

 

 

Tons

Diesel fuel swap contracts

 

 

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

Gallons

Foreign currency exchange contracts

 

1.6 million

 

 

2.3 million

 

 

U.S. dollars

The following table summarizes the location and amount of gains and losses on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015:2021:

 

 

 

Amount of Gain/

(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives

 

 

Amount of Gain/
(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives

 

 

Amount of Gain/
(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Income into Income

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging

instruments under ASC 815

 

Location of Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in Income

on Derivatives

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

Location of Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivatives

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

Metal commodity contracts

 

Cost of materials sold

 

$

3.1

 

 

$

10.0

 

 

$

(11.8

)

 

Cost of materials sold

 

$

10.7

 

 

$

(6.5

)

 

$

(47.3

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Diesel fuel commodity contracts

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling,

general, and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling,
general, and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2028 Notes embedded derivative

 

Other income and (expense), net

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Other income and (expense), net

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

Other income and (expense), net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps (subsequent to de-designation)

 

Interest and other expense on debt

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

$

(2.1

)

Total

 

 

 

$

3.1

 

 

$

10.0

 

 

$

(12.1

)

 

 

 

$

10.7

 

 

$

(4.7

)

 

$

(49.1

)

 

$

 

 

$

(1.9

)

 

$

(2.1

)

The following table summarizes the location and amount of gains and losses on derivatives designated as hedging instruments reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015:

 

 

 

 

Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Income into Income

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Derivatives designated as hedging

   instruments under ASC 815

 

Location of Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in Income

on Derivatives

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Interest rate swaps

 

Interest and other expense on debt

 

$

(0.7

)

 

$

 

 

$

 


As of December 31, 2017, the portion of the $1.0 million interest rate swap asset that would be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months as interest income is approximately $0.2 million.

Fair Value Measurements

To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels as follows:

1.

Level 1—quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the reporting date.

2.

Level 2—inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data.

3.

Level 3—unobservable inputs, such as internally-developed pricing models for the asset or liability due to little or no market activity for the asset or liability.

The following table presents assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2017:ite

 

 

At December 31, 2017

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid and other current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock – available-for-sale investment

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metal commodity contracts

 

$

 

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives

 

$

 

 

$

3.9

 

 

$

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metal commodity contracts

 

$

 

 

$

3.9

 

 

$

 

The following table presents assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2016:

 

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid and other current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock – available-for-sale investment

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metal commodity contracts

 

$

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

$

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metal commodity contracts

 

$

 

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

 


The fair value of each derivative contract is determined using Level 2 inputs and the market approach valuation technique, as described in ASC 820. The Company has various commodity derivatives to lock in nickel and zinc prices for varying time periods. The fair value of these derivatives is determined based on the spot price each individual contract was purchased at and compared with the one-month daily average actual spot price on the London Metals Exchange for nickel and zinc on the valuation date. The Company also has commodity derivatives to lock in hot roll coil, iron ore,nickel, aluminum, and aluminumdiesel fuel prices for varying time periods. The fair value of hot roll coil, iron ore,nickel, aluminum, and aluminumdiesel fuel derivatives is determined based on the spot price each individual contract was purchased at and compared with the one-month daily average actual spot price on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange the Singapore Exchange,(hot roll coil and diesel fuel) and the London Metals Exchange (nickel and aluminum), respectively, for the commodity on the valuation date. The Company had various commodity derivatives to lock in diesel prices for varying time periods. The fair value of these derivatives is determined based on the spot price each individual contract was purchased at and compared with the one-month daily average actual spot price of the Platts Index for Gulf Coast Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel on the valuation date. In addition, the Company has numerous foreign exchange contracts to hedge variability in cash flows when a payment currency is different from our functional currency. The Company defines the fair value of foreign exchange contracts as the amount of the difference between the contracted and current market value at the end of the period. The Company estimates the current market value of foreign exchange contracts by obtaining month-end market quotes of foreign exchange rates and forward rates for contracts with similar terms. The Company uses the exchange rates provided by Reuters. Each commodity, diesel fuel, and foreign exchange contract term varies in the number of months, but in general, contracts are between 31 to 12 months in length. TheAs the fair value of our interest rate swapeach commodity, diesel fuel, and foreign exchange contract is based ondetermined using inputs other than quoted prices that are directly observable (Level 2 inputs) and the sum of all future net presentmarket approach valuation technique, as described in ASC 820, these derivatives balances are classified as Level 2 within the fair value cash flowshierarchy. See Note 10: Employee Benefits for the fixeddefinitions of Level 1, 2, and floating leg of the swap. The future cash flows are derived based on the terms of our interest rate swap, as well as published discount factors, and projected forward LIBOR rates.3 fair value measurements.

The carrying and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

 

 

At December 31, 2017

 

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

 

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

77.4

 

 

$

77.4

 

 

$

80.7

 

 

$

80.7

 

Restricted cash

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

1.0

 

Receivables less provision for allowances, claims, and

   doubtful accounts

 

 

376.3

 

 

 

376.3

 

 

 

326.0

 

 

 

326.0

 

Accounts payable

 

 

275.0

 

 

 

275.0

 

 

 

230.4

 

 

 

230.4

 

Long-term debt, including current portion

 

 

1,045.7

 

 

 

1,125.9

 

 

 

963.5

 

 

 

1,034.2

 

The estimated fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables less provision for allowances, claims and doubtful accounts,provisions, and accounts payable approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The estimated fair value of the Company’sCompany's long-term debt and the current portions thereof is determined by using quoted market prices of Company debt securities (Level 2 inputs).

The fair values less costs to sell of long-lived assets held for sale are assessed each reporting period that they remain classified as held for sale. Any increase or decrease in the held for sale long-lived asset’s fair value less cost to sell is reported as an adjustment to its carrying amount, except that the adjusted carrying amount cannot exceedequal the carrying amountamounts due to the short-term nature of the long-lived asset atunderlying borrowings on the time it was initially classified as heldRyerson Credit Facility which are typically for sale. The fair valuesterms of each property were determined based on appraisals obtained from a third-party, pending sales contracts, or recent listing agreements with third-party brokerage firms (Level 2 inputs)30 to 60 days.

There were no assets or liabilities classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017. The following table presents assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on See the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a non-recurring basis and their level withinfor the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2016:

 

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets - assets held for sale (Note 5)

 

$

 

 

$

3.6

 

 

$

 


Available-For-Sale Investments

The Company has classified investments made during 20102023 and 2012 as available-for-sale at the time of their purchase. Investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value with the related unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Management evaluates investments in an unrealized loss position on whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred on a periodic basis. Factors considered by management in assessing whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred include: the nature of the investment; whether the decline in fair value is attributable to specific adverse conditions affecting the investment; the financial condition of the investee; the severity and the duration of the impairment; and whether we intend to sell the investment or will be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. When it is determined that an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, the investment is written down to its market value at the end of the period in which it is determined that an other-than-temporary decline has occurred.

In 2015 and 2016, the financial condition of the investee declined and the investment was in an unrealized loss position. Based on the duration and severity of our unrealized loss, management determined that an other-than-temporary impairment occurred and thus recognized impairment charges within other income and (expense), net of $12.3 million and $4.7 million, for the years ended December 31, 20162022 values of these assets and 2015, respectively. The financial condition of the investee further declined during the second quarter of 2017, therefore, management determined that an other-than-temporary impairment occurred and recognized an additional $0.2 million impairment charge within other income and (expense), net.liabilities.

As of December 31, 2017, the investment has been in an unrealized loss position from its adjusted cost basis for six months. Management does not currently intend to sell the investment before recovery of its adjusted cost basis. Realized gains and losses are recorded within the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income upon sale of the security and are based on specific identification.

The Company’s available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2017 can be summarized as follows:

 

 

At December 31, 2017

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Common stock

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

 

 

$

(0.1

)

 

$

0.1

 

80


The Company’s available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2016 can be summarized as follows:

 

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Common stock

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

0.4

 

There is no maturity date for this investment and there have been no sales for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.  


Note 16:15: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table details the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and December 31, 2016:2022:

 

 

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss) by Component, net of tax

 

 

 

Foreign
Currency
Translation

 

 

Benefit
Plan
Liabilities

 

 

Interest
Rate
Swap

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Balance at January 1, 2022

 

$

(49.1

)

 

$

(114.5

)

 

$

(1.5

)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

(7.8

)

 

 

25.4

 

 

 

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
   comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

1.5

 

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(7.8

)

 

 

27.0

 

 

 

1.5

 

Balance at December 31, 2022

 

$

(56.9

)

 

$

(87.5

)

 

$

 

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
   comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

(3.5

)

 

 

 

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2023

 

$

(52.2

)

 

$

(87.8

)

 

$

 

 

 

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive

Income (Loss) by Component, net of tax

 

 

 

Foreign

Currency

Translation

 

 

Benefit

Plan

Liabilities

 

 

Available-

For-Sale

Investments

 

 

Cash Flow Hedge - Interest Rate Swap

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Balance at January 1, 2016

 

$

(53.8

)

 

$

(252.5

)

 

$

(0.7

)

 

$

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

(5.0

)

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other

   comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

 

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

(6.2

)

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

(50.2

)

 

$

(258.7

)

 

$

1.1

 

 

$

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

15.4

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

0.2

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other

   comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

(3.0

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.4

 

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

12.4

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

0.6

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

(41.6

)

 

$

(246.3

)

 

$

1.0

 

 

$

0.6

 

The following tables detail the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and December 31, 2016:2022:

 

 

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Details about Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Components

 

Amount reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Affected line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

 

For theYear Ended December 31, 2023

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

Amortization of defined benefit pension
  and other post-retirement benefit plan items

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial gain

 

$

(3.9

)

 

Other income and (expense), net

Curtailment

 

 

(0.8

)

 

Other income and (expense), net

Total before tax

 

 

(4.7

)

 

 

Tax provision

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

Net of tax

 

$

(3.5

)

 

 

 

 

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Details about Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Components

 

Amount reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Affected line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

 

For theYear Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

Amortization of defined benefit pension
  and other post-retirement benefit plan items

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial loss

 

$

2.3

 

 

Other income and (expense), net

Prior service credit

 

 

(0.1

)

 

Other income and (expense), net

Total before tax

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

Tax benefit

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

Net of tax

 

$

1.6

 

 

 

Interest rate swap

 

 

 

 

 

Realized swap interest (subsequent to de-designation)

 

$

1.9

 

 

Interest and other expense on debt

Tax benefit

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

Net of tax

 

$

1.5

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Details about Accumulated Other

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Components

 

Amount reclassified from

Accumulated Other

Comprehensive Income

(Loss)

 

 

Affected line item in the Consolidated Statements of

Comprehensive Income

 

 

For the Year Ended

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

Amortization of defined benefit pension

  and other post-retirement benefit plan items

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial gain

 

$

(6.9

)

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling,

general, and administrative

Prior service cost

 

 

2.9

 

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling,

general, and administrative

Total before tax

 

 

(4.0

)

 

 

Tax provision

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

Net of tax

 

$

(3.0

)

 

 

Other-than-temporary impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other-than-temporary impairment charge

 

$

0.2

 

 

Other income and (expense), net

Tax benefit

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

Net of tax

 

$

0.1

 

 

 

Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized swap interest loss

 

$

0.7

 

 

Interest and other expense on debt

Tax benefit

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

Net of tax

 

$

0.4

 

 

 

81


Note 16: Revenue Recognition

We are a leading value-added processor and distributor of industrial metals with operations in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and China. We purchase large quantities of metal products from primary producers and sell these materials in smaller quantities to a wide variety of metals-consuming industries. Nearly 80% of the metals products sold are processed by us by bending, beveling, blanking, blasting, burning, cutting-to-length, drilling, embossing, flattening, forming, grinding, laser cutting, machining, notching, painting, perforating, polishing, punching, rolling, sawing, scribing, shearing, slitting, stamping, tapping, threading, welding, or other techniques to process materials to a specified thickness, length, width, shape, and surface quality pursuant to specific customer orders.

Revenue Accounting Policy

Revenue is recognized based on the consideration expected to be received for delivery of as-is or processed metal products when, or as, the Company satisfies its contractual obligation to transfer control of a product to a customer, which we refer to as a performance obligation. Predominately all of our contracts contain a single performance obligation.

The majority of our revenue is recognized at a point in time. The Company has determined that the most definitive demonstration that control has transferred to a customer is physical delivery, with the exception of bill and hold and consignment transactions. The Company’s bill-and-hold transactions are arrangements where a customer requests that we bill them for a product even though we retain physical possession of the product until it is subsequently delivered to the customer. Bill and hold revenue is recorded when all of the criteria within ASC 606 are met. Consignment transactions are arrangements where the Company transfers product to a customer location but retains ownership and control of such product until it is used by the customer. Revenue for consignment arrangements is recognized upon the customer’s usage.

Revenues associated with products which we believe have no alternative use, and where the Company has an enforceable right to payment, are recognized on an over time basis. Products with no alternative use include products made from unique alloys, custom extrusions, non-standard gauges, items that have been processed to a custom size that cannot be cost effectively reworked to a standard size, or items processed to customer specific drawings or specifications. Over-time revenues are recorded in proportion with the progress made toward completing the performance obligation.

Ryerson uses both input and output methods of measuring progress towards completion based on the type and extent of processing completed. Input methods are used for complex processing with multiple steps occurring over multiple days. Under the input method, the measure of performance, commonly called percentage of completion, is the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion for the products. Output methods are used for products with minimal processing where the normal pattern of production is less than one day. In these cases, the progress towards completion is measured based on the number of products on hand and ready for delivery in comparison to the total number of products in the order.

Significant judgment is required in determining which products qualify for over time revenue recognition, the methodology to be used in calculating the progress toward completion, and estimating the costs incurred to date and the total cost at completion.

Revenue is recorded net of returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net (excluded from revenues) basis.

Prices are generally fixed at the time of order confirmation. At each quarter end, the Company calculates an estimate of potential cash discounts and returns and allowances that could be taken by customers that are associated with outstanding accounts receivable, as well as estimates of customer rebates. Cash discounts and returns and allowances are calculated based on historical experience. Customer rebates are estimated based on actual sales and projections over the rebate period.

The Company has elected to treat shipping and handling costs as an activity necessary to fulfill the performance obligation to transfer product to the customer and not as a separate performance obligation. Shipping and handling costs are estimated at quarter end in proportion to revenue recognized for transactions where actual costs are not yet known. Shipping and handling costs are included in warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense. The balance recognized related to accrued shipping and handling costs was a net contract liability of $0.1 million at December 31, 2023 and zero at December 31, 2022.

The Company’s performance obligations are typically short-term in nature. As a result, the Company has elected the practical expedient that provides an exemption of the disclosure requirements regarding information about remaining performance obligations on contracts that have original expected durations of one year or less.


82


Disaggregated Revenue

We have one operating and reportable segment, metals service centers.

The Company derives substantially all of its sales from the distribution of metals. The following table shows the Company’s percentage of sales by major product line:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Product Line

 

(Percentage of Sales)

 

Carbon Steel Flat

 

 

26

%

 

 

30

%

 

 

31

%

Carbon Steel Plate

 

 

11

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

10

 

Carbon Steel Long

 

 

14

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

13

 

Stainless Steel Flat

 

 

15

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

18

 

Stainless Steel Plate

 

 

5

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

Stainless Steel Long

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

4

 

Aluminum Flat

 

 

15

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

12

 

Aluminum Plate

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Aluminum Long

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Other

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1

 

Total

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

A significant majority of the Company’s sales are attributable to its U.S. operations. The only operations attributed to foreign countries relate to the Company’s subsidiaries in Canada, China, and Mexico. See Note 13: Segment Information for the Company’s consolidated financial information of our operations by geographic location based on where sales originated.

 

 

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Details about Accumulated Other

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Components

 

Amount reclassified from

Accumulated Other

Comprehensive Income

(Loss)

 

 

Affected line item in the

Consolidated Statements of

Comprehensive Income

 

 

For the Year Ended

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

 

Liquidation of investment in foreign entity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

$

1.2

 

 

Other income and (expense), net

Tax provision (benefit)

 

 

 

 

 

Net of tax

 

$

1.2

 

 

 

Amortization of defined benefit pension

  and other post-retirement benefit plan items

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial gain

 

$

(4.7

)

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling,

general, and administrative

Prior service cost

 

 

2.9

 

 

Warehousing, delivery, selling,

general, and administrative

Total before tax

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

Tax provision

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

Net of tax

 

$

(1.2

)

 

 

Other-than-temporary impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other-than-temporary impairment charge

 

$

4.7

 

 

Other income and (expense), net

Tax benefit

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

Net of tax

 

$

2.9

 

 

 

Revenue is recognized either at a point in time or over time based on if the contract has an enforceable right to payment and the type of product that is being sold to the customer with products that are determined to have no alternative use being recognized over time. The following table summarizes revenues by the type of item sold:

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Timing of Revenue Recognition

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Revenue on products with an alternative use

 

87

%

 

 

89

%

 

 

90

%

Revenue on products with no alternative use

 

13

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

10

 

Total

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

100

%

Contract Balances

A receivable is recognized in the period in which an invoice is issued, which is generally when the product is delivered to the customer. Payment terms on invoiced amounts are typically 30 days from the invoice date. We do not have any contracts with significant financing components.

Receivables, which are included in accounts receivables within the Consolidated Balance Sheets, from contracts with customers were $469.4 million and $517.7 million as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.

Contract assets, which consist primarily of revenues recognized over time that have not yet been invoiced and the value of inventory, as estimated, that will be received in conjunction with product returns, are reported in prepaid expenses and other current assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Contract liabilities, which consist primarily of accruals associated with amounts that will be paid to customers for volume rebates, cash discounts, sales returns and allowances, customer prepayments, estimates of shipping and handling costs associated with performance obligations recorded over time, and bill and hold transactions are reported in other accrued liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Contract assets amounted to $18.8 million and $20.4 million at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Contract liabilities amounted to $16.1 million and $16.3 million at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Contract liabilities satisfied during the period amounted $3.6 million for the year-ended December 31, 2023.

Note 17: Provision for Credit Losses

Provisions for allowances and claims on accounts receivables and contract assets are based upon historical rates, expected trends, and estimates of potential returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives. The Company considers all available information when assessing the adequacy of the provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts.

83


The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of customers and sets credit limits based upon review of the customers’ current credit information, payment history, and the current economic and industry environments. The Company’s credit loss reserve consists of two parts: a) a provision for estimated credit losses based on historical experience and b) a reserve for specific customer collection issues that the Company has identified. Estimation of credit losses requires adjusting historical loss experience for current economic conditions and judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the provision for credit losses reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:

 

Changes in Provision for Expected Credit Losses

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

(In millions)

 

Beginning Balance

$

3.2

 

 

$

2.2

 

Current period provision

 

1.2

 

 

 

1.7

 

Write-offs charged against allowance

 

(2.8

)

 

 

(1.2

)

Recoveries against allowance

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.5

 

Translation

 

(0.2

)

 

––

 

Ending Balance

$

1.7

 

 

$

3.2

 

Note 18: Income Taxes

The elements of the provision (benefit) for income taxes were as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Income (loss) before income tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Income before income tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

11.3

 

 

$

20.1

 

 

$

13.2

 

 

$

172.0

 

 

$

476.5

 

 

$

323.0

 

Foreign

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

(11.3

)

 

 

21.7

 

 

 

46.4

 

 

 

66.1

 

 

$

16.7

 

 

$

26.1

 

 

$

1.9

 

 

$

193.7

 

 

$

522.9

 

 

$

389.1

 

Current income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current income tax provision:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

5.6

 

 

$

(0.3

)

 

$

(0.3

)

 

$

19.8

 

 

$

94.0

 

 

$

64.3

 

Foreign

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

12.0

 

 

 

16.5

 

State

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

6.8

 

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

12.3

 

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

30.5

 

 

 

124.0

 

 

 

93.1

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(9.2

)

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

3.2

 

Total income tax provision (benefit)

 

$

(1.3

)

 

$

7.2

 

 

$

3.7

 

Deferred income tax provision

 

 

16.8

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

0.6

 

Total income tax provision

 

$

47.3

 

 

$

131.4

 

 

$

93.7

 


Income taxes differ from the amounts computed by applying the federal tax rate as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Federal income tax expense computed at statutory
   tax rate of
21%

 

$

40.7

 

 

$

109.8

 

 

$

81.7

 

Additional taxes or credits from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax
   effect

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

17.3

 

 

 

11.7

 

Non-deductible expenses and non-taxable income

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

1.2

 

Foreign rate differences

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

3.4

 

Valuation allowance changes, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.6

)

Changes in uncertain tax positions

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.8

)

Effect of U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act - deemed repatriation transaction tax & GILTI

 

 

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

0.4

 

U.S. federal tax credits

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

All other, net

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

(2.3

)

Total income tax provision

 

$

47.3

 

 

$

131.4

 

 

$

93.7

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(In millions)

 

Federal income tax expense computed at statutory

   tax rate of 35%

 

$

5.8

 

 

$

9.1

 

 

$

0.7

 

Additional taxes or credits from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax

   effect

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Non-deductible expenses and non-taxable income

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

1.8

 

Foreign income (expense) not includable in federal taxable income

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

0.8

 

Valuation allowance changes (net)

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

(2.6

)

 

 

0.1

 

Changes in uncertain tax positions

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

Effect of U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act - deemed repatriation transaction tax

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act - revaluation of deferred taxes

 

 

(10.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

All other, net

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.8

 

Total income tax provision (benefit)

 

$

(1.3

)

 

$

7.2

 

 

$

3.7

 

84


The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”), enacted on December 22, 2017, significantly changes U.S. corporate income tax laws by, among other things, reducing the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 21% starting in 2018 and creating a territorial tax system with a one-time mandatory tax on previously deferred foreign earnings of U.S. subsidiaries. Under ASC Topic 740, the effects of changes in tax rates and laws on deferred tax balances are recognized in the period in which the new legislation is enacted.  As a result of the Act, we have recorded a benefit for the revaluation of our deferred tax assets of $10.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2017 within the provision (benefit) for income taxes line of the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The Act subjects a US shareholder to tax on global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740, No. 5, Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that an entity can make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary basis differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred. GivenAfter considering the complexity oftwo options, the GILTI provisions, we are still evaluatingCompany has elected to provide for the effects of the GILTI provisions and have not yet determined our accounting policy. At December 31, 2017, because we are still evaluating the GILTI provisions and our analysis of future taxable income that is subject to GILTI, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate and have not reflected any adjustmentstax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax will occur. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we have not included any tax expense related to GILTI.

On August 16, 2022 the U.S. government enacted the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”). The IRA includes, among other provisions, a 1 percent excise tax on share repurchases as well as a 15 percent corporate alternative minimum tax (“CAMT”) on corporations with “adjusted financial statement income” in excess of $1 billion for any 3-year period ending with 2022 or later. Currently, we do not meet the requirements for CAMT and do not expect any excise tax that may be due on future stock repurchases to have a material adverse impact to our financial statements. As of December 31, 2023, the Company has accrued $1.0 million for excise tax payable on stock repurchases. Both provisions of the IRA are effective for periods after December 31, 2022.


Certain amounts as of December 31, 2022 in the table below have been adjusted to include the presentation of gross deferred tax assets and liabilities associated with the operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities. The components of the deferred income tax assets and liabilities arising under FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”) were as follows:

 

At December 31,

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

(In millions)

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMT tax credit carryforwards

 

$

30

 

 

$

30

 

Post-retirement benefits other than pensions

 

 

15

 

 

 

28

 

 

$

9

 

 

$

10

 

Federal and foreign net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

59

 

 

 

84

 

State net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

19

 

 

 

12

 

State, local, and foreign net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

7

 

 

 

7

 

Pension liability

 

 

46

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

20

 

Operating lease liability

 

 

93

 

 

 

61

 

Other deductible temporary differences

 

 

27

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

24

 

Less: valuation allowances

 

 

(24

)

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(5

)

 

$

172

 

 

$

244

 

 

$

144

 

 

$

117

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed asset basis difference

 

$

53

 

 

$

81

 

 

$

86

 

 

$

61

 

Inventory basis difference

 

 

92

 

 

 

129

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

99

 

Operating lease asset

 

 

88

 

 

 

61

 

Other intangibles

 

 

9

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

223

 

 

 

280

 

 

 

231

 

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

18

 

 

$

21

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(136

)

 

$

(114

)

The Company will continue to maintain a valuation allowance on certain U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets until such time as in management’s judgment, considering all available positive and negative evidence, the Company determines that these deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable.

The Company had available at December 31, 2017, federal AMT credit carryforwards of approximately $30 million, which as a result of the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will be refundable beginning in 2019 to the extent not utilized to offset future federal income tax liabilities of the Company.

The Company’s deferred tax assets also include $53 million related to U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards which expire in 15 years, $19$6.7 million related to state NOL carryforwards which expire generally in 1 to 20 years, and $6$0.4 million related to foreign NOL carryforwards, which do not expire, in 1 to 5 years, available at December 31, 2017.2023.

Earnings from the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes or foreign withholding tax has been made in our consolidated financial statements related to the indefinitely reinvested earnings. At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had approximately $112$128 million of undistributed foreign earnings, predominately in Canada and China. As a result of the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed during the year,2017, a significant portion of these earnings wereare deemed repatriated. The Company has recorded a $7.2 million provisional estimate of the US tax liability on this deemed distribution in the current year (“Transition Tax”).  Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, “Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” allows for reporting provisional amounts based on reasonable estimates for items for which accounting is incomplete.  Of the $7.2 million of estimated tax expense, $0.5 million is reflected in our deferred tax balances and $6.7 million is reflected in income taxes payable. We have chosen to include an estimate of the Transition Tax due to the complex nature of the calculation and the short amount of time between passing of the legislation and the filing of our financial statements. Were the Company to distribute these non-U.S. earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise in the future, it would no longer be subject to U.S. federal income taxes. A determination of the amount of any unrecognized deferred income tax liability on the undistributed earnings is predominately dependent upon the applicability of foreign withholding taxes and potential U.S. state income taxes. Modeling of the many future potential scenarios and the related unrecognized deferred tax liability is therefore not practicable. None of the Company’s other foreign subsidiaries have a material amount of assets available for repatriation.


85


The Company accounts for uncertain income tax positions in accordance with ASC 740. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

Unrecognized

Tax Benefits

 

 

(In millions)

 

 

Unrecognized
Tax Benefits

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at January 1, 2015

 

$

7.6

 

 

(In millions)

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at January 1, 2021

 

$

2.5

 

Gross increases – tax positions in current periods

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settlements and closing of statute of limitations

 

 

 

 

 

(0.8

)

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

7.6

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2021

 

$

1.7

 

Gross increases – tax positions in current periods

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settlements and closing of statute of limitations

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.1

)

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

7.3

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2022

 

$

1.6

 

Gross increases – tax positions in current periods

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

Settlements and closing of statute of limitations

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

(0.2

)

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

6.3

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2023

 

$

2.7

 

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company has substantially concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for all years through 2009.2019, noting that the utilization of net operating losses from prior years could be subject to review. Substantially all state and local income tax matters have been concluded through 2006.2017, except where statutes of limitations have been extended. The Company has substantially concluded foreign income tax matters through 20092014 for all significant foreign jurisdictions.

We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. We had approximately $1.7$1.0 million and $0.5 million of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect our effective tax rate if recognized was $4.6$1.7 million and $5.6$1.1 million as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.

Note 18:19: Earnings Per Share

On July 16, 2007, Ryerson Holding was capitalized with 21,250,000 shares of common stock by Platinum Equity, LLC. On August 13, 2014, Ryerson Holding completed an initial public offering of 11 million shares of common stock at a price to the public of $11.00 per share. On July 25, 2016, Ryerson Holding closed an underwritten public offering of 5 million shares of common stock at a price to the public of $15.25 per share. All shares outstanding are common shares and have equal voting, liquidation, and preference rights.

Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Ryerson Holding’s common stock is determined based on earnings (loss) for the period divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Ryerson Holding’s common stock considers the effect of potential common shares, unless inclusion of the potential common shares would have an antidilutive effect. Stock-based awards with a grant price greater than the average market price of our common stock are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the impact would have been antidilutive.  The weighted average number of shares excluded were 100,068, zero, 98,548, and 39,28331,697, for the twelve-month periodsyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015,2021, respectively.

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Basic and diluted earnings per share

 

2023

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

 

(In millions, except number of shares which are reflected in thousands and per share data)

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation

 

$

145.7

 

 

$

391.0

 

 

$

294.3

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

34,961

 

 

 

37,555

 

 

 

38,362

 

Dilutive effect of stock-based awards

 

 

606

 

 

 

727

 

 

 

547

 

Weighted average shares outstanding adjusted for dilutive securities

 

 

35,567

 

 

 

38,282

 

 

 

38,909

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

4.17

 

 

$

10.41

 

 

$

7.67

 

Diluted

 

$

4.10

 

 

$

10.21

 

 

$

7.56

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

 

2017

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(In millions, except share and per share data)

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation

 

$

17.1

 

 

$

18.7

 

 

$

(0.5

)

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

37,176,398

 

 

 

34,295,829

 

 

 

32,057,764

 

Dilutive effect of stock-based awards

 

 

117,804

 

 

 

105,417

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding adjusted for dilutive securities

 

 

37,294,202

 

 

 

34,401,246

 

 

 

32,057,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.46

 

 

$

0.55

 

 

$

(0.02

)

Diluted

 

$

0.46

 

 

$

0.54

 

 

$

(0.02

)

Note 20: Subsequent Events

Bargaining Unit Pension Plan Termination. In the first quarter of 2024, the Ryerson Canada Bargaining Unit Pension Plan made $1.2 million of lump sum payments to plan participants and purchased $5.0 million of annuities on behalf of plan participants. The lump sum payments and annuity purchases consisted of all of the existing liabilities of the Ryerson Canada Bargaining Unit

86


Pension Plan, resulting in the termination of the plan. The Ryerson Canada Bargaining Unit Pension Plan was fully funded as of the termination date, and as such, all lump sum payments and annuity purchases were funded with pension plan assets. As a result, the Company recorded a $2.2 million settlement loss in the first quarter of 2024.

Dividends. On February 21, 2024, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.1875 per share of common stock, payable on March 21, 2024 to stockholders of record as of March 7, 2024. Future quarterly dividends, if any, will be subject to Board approval.

87



RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

SUMMARY BY QUARTERFOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2023, 2022, AND 2021

(In millions except per share data)

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

Gross Profit

 

 

Income (Loss)

Before Income

Taxes

 

 

Net Income

(Loss)

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

Attributable

to Ryerson

Holding

Corporation

 

 

Basic

Earnings

(Loss) per

Share

 

 

Diluted

Earnings

(Loss) per

Share

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter (1)

 

$

702.6

 

 

$

147.6

 

 

$

21.6

 

 

$

13.5

 

 

$

13.5

 

 

$

0.42

 

 

$

0.42

 

Second Quarter (2)

 

 

739.8

 

 

 

163.0

 

 

 

9.7

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

0.17

 

 

 

0.17

 

Third Quarter

 

 

735.1

 

 

 

145.4

 

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

0.23

 

 

 

0.23

 

Fourth Quarter (3)

 

 

682.2

 

 

 

114.6

 

 

 

(15.2

)

 

 

(8.4

)

 

 

(8.6

)

 

 

(0.23

)

 

 

(0.23

)

Year

 

$

2,859.7

 

 

$

570.6

 

 

$

26.1

 

 

$

18.9

 

 

$

18.7

 

 

$

0.55

 

 

$

0.54

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

814.5

 

 

$

160.6

 

 

$

21.8

 

 

$

15.0

 

 

$

14.8

 

 

$

0.40

 

 

$

0.40

 

Second Quarter (4)

 

 

875.4

 

 

 

140.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

0.02

 

Third Quarter

 

 

864.2

 

 

 

145.0

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

0.05

 

 

 

0.05

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

810.6

 

 

 

136.5

 

 

 

(6.3

)

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

$

3,364.7

 

 

$

582.5

 

 

$

16.7

 

 

$

18.0

 

 

$

17.1

 

 

$

0.46

 

 

$

0.46

 

(1)

Included in the first quarter 2016 results is an $8.2 million gain on the repurchase of debt.

(2)

Included in the second quarter 2016 results is a $15.1 million loss on the repurchase of debt. The second quarter of 2016 also included a $2.8 million charge due to an other-than-temporary-impairment recognized on an available-for-sale investment.

(3)

Included in the fourth quarter 2016 results is a $1.5 million loss on repurchase of debt. The fourth quarter of 2016 also included a $1.9 million charge due to an other-than-temporary-impairment recognized on an available-for-sale investment.

(4)

Included in the second quarter 2017 results is a $0.2 million charge due to an other-than-temporary impairment recognized on an available-for-sale investment.


SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION

(Parent Company Only)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at
Beginning
of Period

 

 

Additions
Charged
(Credited)
to Income

 

 

Deductions
from
Reserves

 

 

 

 

Balance
at End
of Period

 

Year Ended December 31, 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

3.2

 

 

$

1.2

 

 

$

(2.7

)

(A)

 

 

$

1.7

 

Valuation allowance—deferred tax assets

 

 

5.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.0

)

(B)

 

 

 

4.0

 

Year Ended December 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

2.2

 

 

$

1.7

 

 

$

(0.7

)

(A)

 

 

$

3.2

 

Valuation allowance—deferred tax assets

 

 

5.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.0

 

Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

1.7

 

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

(0.9

)

(A)

 

 

$

2.2

 

Valuation allowance—deferred tax assets

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.6

)

(C)

 

 

 

5.0

 

NOTES:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Administrative and other expenses

 

$

(0.8

)

 

$

(0.8

)

 

$

(0.9

)

Interest income on intercompany loans

 

 

6.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in income of subsidiaries

 

 

23.6

 

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

10.2

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

29.3

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

9.3

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

12.2

 

 

 

(16.1

)

 

 

9.8

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

17.1

 

 

$

18.7

 

 

$

(0.5

)

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.

(A)

SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION

(Parent Company Only)

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In millions)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

17.1

 

 

$

18.7

 

 

$

(0.5

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

(12.4

)

Gain (loss) on intra-entity foreign currency transactions

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

(8.6

)

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investment

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

(8.9

)

Other-than-temporary impairment on available-for-sale investment

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

12.3

 

Liquidation of investment in foreign entity

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

Gain on cash flow hedges

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit

   plans

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

(10.6

)

 

 

7.8

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax

 

 

27.5

 

 

 

(4.1

)

 

 

(9.8

)

Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive

   income (loss)

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

5.8

 

Comprehensive income (loss), after tax

 

$

38.6

 

 

$

17.9

 

 

$

(16.1

)

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.


SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION

(Parent Company Only)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

17.1

 

 

$

18.7

 

 

$

(0.5

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by

   operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

 

(23.6

)

 

 

(3.4

)

 

 

(10.2

)

Deferred income taxes

 

 

12.2

 

 

 

(16.1

)

 

 

9.3

 

(Increase) decrease in receivables/payables from subsidiaries

 

 

(5.6

)

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

11.4

 

Decrease in other assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

Decrease in accounts payable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.0

)

Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

0.1

 

Net adjustments

 

 

(17.0

)

 

 

(18.5

)

 

 

0.8

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.3

 

Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11.4

)

Loan to related company

 

 

 

 

 

(71.7

)

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

(71.7

)

 

 

(11.4

)

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

71.5

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11.1

)

Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.1

 

Cash and cash equivalents—end of period

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.


SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION

(Parent Company Only)

BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except shares)

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

 

Receivable from subsidiaries

 

 

4.1

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

 

Long-term receivable from subsidiaries

 

 

71.7

 

 

 

71.7

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

33.8

 

 

 

46.0

 

Total assets

 

$

109.7

 

 

$

117.7

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued liabilities

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

0.1

 

Payable to subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

1.6

 

Dividends in excess of investment in subsidiaries

 

 

119.6

 

 

 

166.9

 

Total liabilities

 

 

119.7

 

 

 

168.5

 

Ryerson Holding Corporation Stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 7,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued at

   2017 and 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 37,421,081

   shares issued at 2017; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 37,345,117 issued at 2016

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.4

 

Capital in excess of par value

 

 

377.6

 

 

 

375.4

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(95.1

)

 

 

(112.2

)

Treasury stock at cost – Common stock of 212,500 shares in 2017 and 2016

 

 

(6.6

)

 

 

(6.6

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(286.3

)

 

 

(307.8

)

Total Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

(10.0

)

 

 

(50.8

)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

109.7

 

 

$

117.7

 

See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.


SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION

(Parent Company Only)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In millions)

Note 1: BasisBad debts written off of presentation

In the parent company only financial statements, Ryerson Holding’s investment in subsidiaries is stated at cost plus equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries since the date of acquisition. Ryerson Holding’s share of net income (loss) of its unconsolidated subsidiaries is included in consolidated income using the equity method. The parent company only financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 2: Guarantees

On May 24, 2016, Ryerson Holding provided an unconditional guarantee of the 2022 Notes, jointly$2.8 million, $1.2 million, and severally with the other guarantors of the 2022 Notes. Ryerson Holding previously guaranteed the 2017 Notes and 2018 Notes until their repayment in 2016.

Note 3: Dividends from subsidiaries

There were no cash dividends paid to Ryerson Holding from its consolidated subsidiaries$1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2023, 2022, and 2015.2021, respectively.

(B)
Adjustment to foreign tax credits and corresponding valuation allowance.
(C)
Reversals of valuation allowances due to change in realizability of state and foreign net operating loss deferred tax assets.


88


RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATIONITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIESDISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTSNone.

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 2016, AND 2015

(In millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for Allowances

 

 

 

Balance at

Beginning

of Period

 

 

Acquisition of

Business

 

 

 

Additions

Charged

(Credited)

to Income

 

 

Additions

Charged

to Other

Comprehensive

Income (Loss)

 

 

Deductions

from

Reserves

 

 

 

Balance

at End

of Period

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

4.6

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

1.5

 

 

$

 

 

$

(1.2

)

(A)

 

$

4.9

 

Valuation allowance—deferred tax assets

 

 

20.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24.4

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

5.2

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

3.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

(3.7

)

(A)

 

$

4.6

 

Valuation allowance—deferred tax assets

 

 

22.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.0

 

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

5.3

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

2.3

 

 

$

 

 

$

(2.4

)

(A)

 

$

5.2

 

Valuation allowance—deferred tax assets

 

 

22.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22.6

 

NOTES:

(A)

Bad debts written off during the year.


ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM  9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by SEC Rule 15d-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-15 as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.2023.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The report of management on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172023 and the attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our internal control over financial reporting are set forth in Part II, "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2017.2023.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

During the Company’s last fiscal quarter, the Company traded under a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (“10b5-1 Plan”), as defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K. Such 10b5-1 Plan was adopted on August 11, 2023 and will continue until March 1, 2024. Shares of Ryerson stock for up to $25,000,000 may be purchased pursuant to the 10b5-1 Plan.

89


OTHER INFORMATION.

None.


PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)(“SEC”) within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2023.

Code of Ethics

Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to all officers, directors, and employees, which is available on our Investor Relations website (http://www.ir.ryerson.com) under "Governance Documents." We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and by posting such information on the website address and location specified above.

Code of Ethics

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics that contains the ethical principles by which our chief executive officer, chief financial officer,Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and general counsel,General Counsel, among others, are expected to conduct themselves when carrying out their duties and responsibilities. A copy of our Code of Ethics may be found on our Investor Relations website under “Governance Documents” at www.ir.ryerson.com.http://ir.ryerson.com. Our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report. We will provide a copy of our Code of Ethics to any person, without charge, upon request, by writing to the Compliance Officer, Ryerson Holding Corporation, 227 West Monroe Street, 27th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60606 (telephone number (312) 292-5000). We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on our website at www.ir.ryerson.comhttp://ir.ryerson.com or by filing a Form 8-K with the SEC.

We have an insider trading policy that governs the purchase, sale, and other dispositions of our securities by our directors, officers, and employees, and by the Company itself, that we believe is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules, and regulations and New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The insider trading policy is filed as Exhibit 19.1 to this Annual Report.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Information concerning compensation of our executive officers and directors for the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, is presented under the captions “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Tables,” and “Director Compensation” in our proxy statement. This information is incorporated herein by reference.

Information concerning compensation committee interlocks is presented under the caption “Compensation Committee—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

The report of our Compensation Committee can be found under the caption “Compensation Committee Report” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners as of February 28, 2018,21, 2024, is set forth under the caption “Stock Ownership—Ownership of More Than 5% of Ryerson Stock” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information concerning the security ownership of our directors and executive officers as of February 28, 2018,21, 2024, is set forth under the caption “Stock Ownership—Directors and Executive Officers” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Our stockholders have approved our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, or 2014 Plan, which is the Company’s only equity compensation plan.


90


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table below presents our equity compensation plan informationsets forth, as of December 31, 2017:2023, information concerning equity compensation plans under which our securities are authorized for issuance. The table does not reflect grants, awards, exercises, terminations, or expirations since that date.

Plan Category

 

Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights

 

 

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants,
and rights

 

 

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in first column)

 

 

 

(1)

 

 

(2)

 

 

(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by
   security holders

 

 

1,324,572

 

 

$

16.50

 

 

 

2,152,464

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by
   security holders

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1,324,572

 

 

$

16.50

 

 

 

2,152,464

 

Plan Category

 

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants, and rights

 

 

 

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding

options, warrants,

and rights

 

 

Number of securities

remaining available for

future issuance under

equity compensation plans

(excluding securities

reflected in first column)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by

   security holders (1)

 

 

800,132

 

(2)

 

$

 

 

 

723,787

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by

   security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

800,132

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

723,787

 

(1)
Includes (i) 810,050 shares of our common stock subject to performance units, which vest depending on continued employment or service and the level of attainment of certain performance metrics, (ii) 393,772 shares of our common stock, including earned dividend equivalent rights, subject to restricted stock units, which vest depending on continued employment or service, and (iii) 120,750 shares of our common stock subject to stock options, which vest over a four-year period depending on continued employment or service and the level of attainment of certain stock market metrics, with a fifth year catch up that allows for vesting if any of the four individual vesting tranche conditions are not met.

(1)

Consists of the Company’s “2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan,” which is described in Amendment No. 23 to our registration statement on Form S-1, filed on August 7, 2014.

(2)

Includes (i) 548,475 shares of our common stock subject to performance units, which vest depending on continued employment or service and the level of attainment of certain performance metrics and (ii) 251,657 shares of our common stock subject to restricted stock units, which vest depending on continued employment or service.

(2)
Once vested, each stock option can be exercised at a price of $16.50 in exchange for one share of the Company’s common stock.
(3)
All the shares of common stock that remain available for future issuance as of December 31, 2023, were available under the 2014 Plan. Subject to certain express limits of the 2014 Plan, shares available for award purposes under the 2014 Plan generally may be used for any type of award authorized under that plan including options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards. The number of common shares reserved and available for delivery under the 2014 Plan is subject to adjustment.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Information concerning the independence of our directors, certain relationships, and related transactions during 2017,2023, and our policies with respect to such transactions is set forth under the captions “Board of Directors” and “Related Party Transactions” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is set forth under the captions “Items You May Vote On—Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” “Audit Committee—Audit, Audit-Related, and Other Non-Audit Services,” and “Audit Committee—Pre-Approval Policies” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.


91


PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)
Financial Statements and Schedules

The following financial statements and schedules listed below are included in this Form 10-K:

Financial Statements (See Item 8)

Schedule I

Schedule II

All other schedules are omitted sincebecause the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedules.

(b)
Exhibits

(b) Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit

Incorporated by Reference

Filed

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File No.

Filing Date

Herewith

3.12.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 4, 2018, by and among Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., Hunter MergerCo, Inc., Central Steel and Wire Company, and Fortis Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, solely in its capacity as the Stockholder Representative thereunder.*

8-K

001-34735

June 5, 2018

3.1

Form of Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ryerson Holding Corporation.

S-1/A-22

333-164484

August 6, 2014

3.2

Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ryerson Holding Corporation.

S-1/A-15

333-164484

May 6, 2013

4.1

Form of Common Stock Certificate of Ryerson Holding Corporation.

10-K

001-34735

March 9, 2016

4.2

Indenture, dated as of May 24, 2016, by and among Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Trustee, relating to the Issuer’s 11.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2022.

8-K

001-34735

May 24, 2016

4.3

Form of Investor Rights Agreement, by and among Ryerson Holding Corporation, Platinum Equity Capital Partners, L.P., Platinum Equity Capital Partners-PF, L.P., Platinum Equity Capital Partners-A, L.P., Platinum Equity Capital Partners II, L.P., Platinum Equity Capital Partners-PF II, L.P., Platinum Equity Capital Partners-A II, L.P. and Platinum Rhombus Principals, LLC.

S-1/A-15

333-164484

May 6, 2013

10.14.4

General Security Agreement, dated October 19, 2007, by and between Ryerson Canada, Inc. and BankDescription of America, N.A., as Canadian Agent.the Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

S-4

333-152102

July 3, 2008

X

10.210.1

Ryerson Nonqualified Savings Plan.

S-4/A-2

333-152102

February 24, 2009

10.310.2

Ryerson Holding Corporation Retention Bonus Plan.

S-1/A-19

333-164484

June 24, 2014


10.4

Ryerson Annual Incentive Plan (as amended through June 14, 2007).

S-1

333-164484

January 22, 2010

10.510.3

Ryerson Holding Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

S-1/A-21

333-164484

July 24, 2014

92


10.4

10.6

Offer Letter Agreement, dated May 7, 2015, by and between Ryerson Holding Corporation and Edward J. Lehner.

8-K

001-34735

May 8, 2015

10.710.5

Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement, dated June 1, 2015, by and between Ryerson Holding Corporation and Edward J. Lehner.

8-K

001-34735

June 5, 2015

10.810.6

Form of 2015 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.

10-Q

001-34735

August 12, 2015

10.910.7

Form of 2015 Performance Unit Agreement.

10-Q

001-34735

August 12, 2015

10.1010.8

Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement.

S-1/A18

333-164484

March 27, 2014

10.1110.9

Form of Participation Agreement for the Ryerson Holding Corporation Retention Bonus Plan.

S-1/A-19

333-164484

June 24, 2014

10.12

Employment Agreement, dated December 10, 2004, between Ryerson Tull, Inc. and Kevin D. Richardson, as amended.

10-Q

001-34735

May 7, 2015

10.13

Employment Agreement, dated January 3, 2005, between Ryerson Tull, Inc. and Michael Burbach, as amended.

10-Q

001-34735

May 7, 2015

10.1410.10

Directors Compensation Summary Sheet.

10-K

001-34735

March 9, 2016

X

10.1510.11

Intercreditor Agreement by and between Bank of America, N.A. as ABL Collateral Agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Notes Collateral Agent Dated as of October 10, 2012.

10-K

001-34735

March 9, 2016

10.16

Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 11, 2015, to the Intercreditor Agreement dated as of October 10, 2012, by and between Bank of America, N.A. as ABL Collateral Agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Notes Collateral Agent.

10-K

001-34735

March 9, 2016


10.17

Joinder Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015, to Intercreditor Agreement dated as of October 10, 2012 and amended as of March 11, 2015 by and between Bank of America, N.A. as ABL Collateral Agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Notes Collateral Agent.

10-K

001-34735

March 9, 2016

10.18

Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2015, among Ryerson Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., Sunbelt-Turret Steel, Inc., Turret Steel Industries, Inc., Imperial Trucking Company, LLC, Wilcox-Turret Cold Drawn, Inc., Fay Industries, Inc., Ryerson Procurement Corporation, Ryerson Canada, Inc., and each of the other borrowers and guarantors, the lenders party thereto from time to time, and Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent and collateral agent.

8-K

001-34735

July 29, 2015

10.1910.12

Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 16, 2016, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2015, by and among Ryerson Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., Ryerson Canada, Inc., and each of the other borrowers and guarantors, the lenders party thereto from time to time, and Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent and collateral agent.

8-K

001-34735

November 17, 2016

10.2010.13

Security Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2015, Ryerson Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (“Ryerson”), and the domestic subsidiaries of Ryerson from time to time party thereto in their capacities as pledgors, assignors and debtors thereunder in favor of Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as collateral agent, as pledgee, assignee and secured party for the benefit of the secured parties.

8-K

001-34735

July 29, 2015

10.2110.14

Canadian Security Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015 between Ryerson Canada, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as collateral agent.

8-K

001-34735

July 29, 2015

93


10.2210.15

Canadian Security Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015 between Turret Steel Canada, ULC, and Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as collateral agent.

8-K

001-34735

July 29, 2015

10.2310.16

Amendment No. 2, dated as of June 28, 2018 to Credit Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015, among Ryerson Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., Wilcox-Turret Cold Drawn, Inc., Ryerson Procurement Corporation, Southern Tool Steel, LLC, Ryerson Canada, Inc., and each of the other borrowers and guarantors, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent and collateral agent.

8-K

001-34735

June 29, 2018

10.17

Amendment No. 3, dated as of September 23, 2019 to Credit Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015, among Ryerson Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., Wilcox-Turret Cold Drawn, Inc., Ryerson Procurement Corporation, Southern Tool Steel, LLC, Ryerson Canada, Inc., and each of the other borrowers and guarantors, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent and collateral agent.

8-K

001-34735

September 27, 2019

10.18

Amendment No. 4, dated as of November 5, 2020 to Credit Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015, among Ryerson Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., Ryerson Canada, Inc., and each of the other borrowers and guarantors, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent and collateral agent.

8-K

001-34735

November 9, 2020

10.19

Amendment No. 5, dated as of June 29, 2022 to Credit Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015, among Ryerson Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., Ryerson Canada, Inc., and each of the other borrowers and guarantors, the lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent and collateral agent.

8-K

001-34735

June 29, 2022

10.20

Employment Agreement, dated September 8, 2005,February 22, 2021, between Ryerson Tull, Inc.Holding Corporation and Erich Schnaufer,James Claussen, as amended.amended and restated.

10-K

001-34735

March 9, 2016February 24, 2021

10.21

Ryerson Holding Corporation Stock Option Grant Notice

10-Q

001-34735

May 5, 2021

21.1

10.22

Form of retention bonus agreement for Edward J. Lehner, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company

X

19.1

Ryerson Holding Corporation Insider Trading Policy

X

21.1

List of Subsidiaries of Ryerson Holding Corporation.

X

94


23.1


23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirm..

X

31.1

Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

X

31.2

Certificate of the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

X

32.1

Written Statement of Edward J. Lehner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

X

32.2

Written Statement of Erich S. Schnaufer,James J. Claussen, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

X

101.INS97.1

XBRL Instance Document.Ryerson Holding Corporation Clawback Policy

X

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.With Embedded Linkbases Document

X

101.CAL104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.document)

X

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

X

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

X

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

X

* Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Ryerson agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit upon request, subject to Ryerson’s right to request confidential treatment of any requested schedule or exhibit.

** Furnished herewith.

95


SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Ryerson Holding Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION

By:

/s/ Erich S. SchnauferJames J. Claussen

Erich S. SchnauferJames J. Claussen

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (duly(Duly authorized signatory and principal financial officer of the registrant)

Date: March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Edward J. Lehner

President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Director

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Edward J. Lehner

/s/ Erich S. SchnauferJames J. Claussen

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Erich S. SchnauferJames J. Claussen

/s/ Molly D. Kannan

Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

February 21, 2024

Molly D. Kannan

/s/ Kirk K. Calhoun

Director

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Kirk K. Calhoun

/s/ Court D. Carruthers

Director

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Court D. Carruthers

/s/ Eva M. Kalawski

Director

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Eva M. Kalawski

/s/ Jacob Kotzubei

Director

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Jacob Kotzubei

/s/ Stephen P. Larson

Director

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Stephen P. Larson

/s/ Philip E. Norment

Director

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Philip E. Norment

/s/ Mary Ann Sigler

Director

March 5, 2018February 21, 2024

Mary Ann Sigler

96

101