Table of Contents


 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172023

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

 

Commission File Number 0-19437

TRANSENTERIX,ASENSUS SURGICAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

11-2962080

(State or other jurisdiction of


incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer


Identification No.)

635 Davis

1 TW Alexander Drive, Suite 300, Morrisville,160, Durham, NC 2756027703

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s

Registrants telephone number, including area code: (919) 765-8400

Securities registered pursuant to Section12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on whichwhere registered

Common Stock


$0.001 par value per share

ASXC

NYSE American

NYSE American

Securities registered pursuant to Section12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of class)

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes      No  .☒.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes      No  .☒.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes      No  .☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes      No  .☐.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K  .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

 

Emerging Growth Company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b) ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)    Yes      No  .☒.

On June 30, 2017,2023, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value (based on the average bid and asked price of its common stock on that date) of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $70.8$120.1 million.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 1, 201815, 2024 was 200,049,326.271,986,369.

Documents Incorporated By Reference:  Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14Aproxy statement to be filed in respect of our 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 


 


TRANSENTERIX,ASENSUS SURGICAL, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

DECEMBER 31, 20172023

Table of Contents

 

Page

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

1

ITEM 1.A.

RISK FACTORS

921

ITEM 1.B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

35

ITEM 1.C.

22CYBERSECURITY

35

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

2236

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

2236

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

2236

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

2337

ITEM 6.

RESERVED

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA37

25

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

2638

ITEM 7.A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

3947

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

4048

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

7775

ITEM 9.A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

7775

ITEM 9.B.

OTHER INFORMATION

 

77

PART III

ITEM 10.9.C.

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

77

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.GOVERNANCE

7978

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.78

79

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.MATTERS

7978

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.INDEPENDENCE

79

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.SERVICES

79

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

80

ITEM 16.

FORM 10-K SUMMARY

82

83

i

 

i


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, (“or Annual Report”)Report, contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).or the Exchange Act. Such forward-looking statements contain information about our expectations, beliefs or intentions regarding our product development and commercialization efforts, business, financial condition, results of operations, strategies or prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results as of the date they are made. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Many factors could cause our actual operations or results to differ materially from the operations and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to:

our ability to successfully transition from a research and development company to a company focused on marketing, sales and distribution of our products;

our history of operating losses;

our ability to successfully develop, clinically test and commercialize our products;

our ability to continue as a going concern;

our ability to identify and pursue development of additional products;

our ability to raise capital to finance our business activities;

the timing and outcome of the regulatory review process for our products;

our ability to successfully develop, clinically test and commercialize new products and services;

competition from existing and new market entrants;

our ability to successfully finalize collaboration agreements;

the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on our financial results;

our ability to successfully implement our digital surgery offerings and grow our business as a result;

our history of operating losses;

our ability to successfully implement our Performance-Guided Surgery™ strategy and grow our business as a result;

our need to obtain additional funding to continue our operations;

our ability to successfully grow the sales and distribution of our products;

our ability to attract and retain key management, marketing and scientific personnel;

our ability to increase use of our products by existing and new customers;

our ability to successfully prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, defend and enforce patent claims and other intellectual property rights;

competition from existing and new market entrants;

changes in the health care and regulatory environments of the United States, Europe and other jurisdictions in which the Company operates; and

our ability to identify and pursue development of additional products;

other factors contained in the section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in this Annual Report.

the timing and outcome of the regulatory review process for our products and product candidates;

the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on our financial results;

our ability to attract and retain key management, marketing and scientific personnel;

our ability to successfully prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, defend and enforce patent claims and other intellectual property rights;

changes in the healthcare regulatory environments of the United States, Europe and other jurisdictions in which the Company operates; and

other factors contained in the section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in this Annual Report.

We do not undertake any obligation to update our forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable law.

 

In February 2021, we changed our name from TransEnterix, Inc. to Asensus Surgical, Inc. In this Annual Report we refer to TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc. and its subsidiaries collectively as the “Company,” “it,” “we,” “our” or “us.”  The Company’s subsidiaries are: TransEnterix International; TransEnterixAsensus Surgical US, Inc., Asensus International, Inc.; Asensus Surgical Italia S.r.l.; TransEnterixAsensus Surgical Europe S.à.R.L; TransEnterix Europe S.à.R.L, Bertrange, Swiss Branch, Lugano; TransEnterix Asia Pte. r.l.; Asensus Surgical Taiwan Ltd; Asensus Surgical Japan K.K.; Asensus Surgical Israel Ltd.; Asensus Surgical Netherlands B.V.; and TransEnterix Taiwan Ltd.Asensus Surgical Canada, Inc.

ii

PART I

 

ITEM1.BUSINESS

 

iiIntroduction


 

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

Overview

TransEnterix isWe are a medical device company that is digitizing the interface between the surgeon and the patient to improvepioneer a new era of surgery, that we refer to as Performance-Guided Surgery™, or PGS, by unlocking clinical intelligence to enable surgeons to deliver consistently superior outcomes to patients. Built upon the foundation of digital laparoscopy and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery, by addressingor MIS, (which remains the gold standard of surgery today), the Company is pioneering PGS to increase surgeon control and reduce surgical variability. With the addition of machine vision, Augmented Intelligence, and deep learning capabilities throughout the surgical experience delivered via the Senhance® Surgical System, combined with the Intelligent Surgical Unit™, or ISU™, we intend to holistically address the current clinical, surgeon performance (fatigue and ergonomics), and economic challenges associated with current laparoscopic and robotic optionsshortcomings that impact surgical outcomes in today'sa value-based healthcare environment. The CompanyWe are also working to incorporate all of this in our next generation robotic system we call the LUNA™ Surgical System.

Our mission is focused on leveraging robotic technologies, in combination with real time computer vision and machine learning capabilities, or Augmented Intelligence, to reduce variability in surgery, drive more predictable outcomes, optimize resources and costs, and work with hospital systems that strive to employ innovative healthcare strategies. By leveraging advanced digital technologies, we aim to enable surgeons to take the commercialization ofbest surgical practices and techniques from everywhere and utilize them to help improve outcomes, reduce variability, control the Senhance™ Surgical System, which digitizes laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery. The system allows for robotic precision, haptic feedback, surgeon camera control via eye sensing and improved ergonomics while offering responsible economics.

The Senhance System has been granted a CE Mark in Europe for laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic surgery,unexpected, reduce costs, as well as limited thoracic operations excluding cardiacreduce cognitive and vascular surgery. In April 2017,physical fatigue for surgeons, and provide patients with the best care possible. We believe that by digitizing the interface between the surgeon and patient, we can unlock clinical intelligence to pioneer Performance-Guided Surgery, which we believe is the missing element in surgery today.

Recent Developments

As of the date of this filing, the Company submittedcontinues to manage cash prudently and believes it has cash into early June 2024. We are actively pursuing a 510(k) applicationnumber of financing options, including collaborations, contractual relationships and strategic transactions. However, we are aware that such alternatives are and may continue to be time consuming and that successful consummation of a transaction or transactions is not assured. We may need to pursue alternative pathways, including, but not limited to, debt financing, sale of assets or equity-based financing. If none of these alternatives are consummated, we may need to suspend our product development programs, including the LUNA System, and take other actions to preserve cash. We may also need to seek bankruptcy if these measures are insufficient or unsuccessful.

The disclosures in this Annual Report describe our business activities during 2023 and reflect our future product development plans if sufficient financing becomes available.

During 2023, we focused our research and development, or R&D, activities on advancing the LUNA Surgical System, our next generation robotic system, and the ongoing developments in our ISU and digital surgery offerings.

We believe the LUNA System we are developing will be a best in class robot that will use 3mm and 5mm instruments (as contrasted with most current systems available that use 8mm instruments), including TrueWrist™ fully wristed 5mm instruments. The LUNA System will also feature monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery capabilities, rapid instrument exchange with our proprietary instrument drive system, an open platform with a smaller footprint in the OR (as compared to the FDASenhance System), up to four-arm configuration with enhanced manipulation and dexterity, a surgeon console with 4K-3D capabilities and unconstrained handles with improved digital features while retaining haptic feedback.

In December 2023, we successfully hosted a surgeon lab to conduct an in vivo evaluation of the LUNA System’s hardware, software and instruments in porcine models. The lab allowed nine participating independent surgeons to evaluate the LUNA System’s functionality through thirteen surgical procedures across gynecology, urology and general surgery.

Also, to prepare for pilot manufacturing of the Senhance System. On October 13, 2017, the Company received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for useLUNA System, in laparoscopic colorectal and gynecologic surgery.  These indications cover 23 procedures, including benign and oncologic procedures.  We anticipate expanding the indications for use in the middle of 2018. The Senhance System is available for sale in the U.S., the EU and select other countries.

The Senhance System is a multi-port robotic surgery system which allows multiple robotic arms to control instruments and a camera. The system features advanced technology to enable surgeons with haptic feedback and the ability to move the camera via eye movement. The system replicates laparoscopic motion that is familiar to experienced surgeons, and integrates three-dimensional high definition, or 3DHD, vision technology. The Senhance System also offers responsible economics to hospitals by offering robotic technology with reusable instruments thereby reducing additional costs per surgery when compared to other robotic solutions.

The Company has also developed the SurgiBot™ System, a single-port, robotically enhanced laparoscopic surgical platform. On December 18, 2017, the Company announced that it had2023 we entered into an agreement with Great Belief International Limited, or GBIL,Flextronics Medical Sales and Marketing, Ltd. for the design and manufacturing support.

1

The LUNA System will continue our tradition of providing instruments that are reusable and can be re-sterilized and re‑processed, and, with improvements in manufacturing, are expected to advancehave lower costs per procedure compared to competitive robotic options.

Our 2023 development efforts for digital surgery with the SurgiBot System towards global commercialization.  TheISU included:

initial development of an analytical tools feature set, which includes intra-operative surgical planning capabilities that will help surgeons to map out and plan for specific surgical actions intraoperatively using the ISU’s Augmented Intelligence features;

creation of a safety tools feature set which includes real-time identification, notifications to the surgical team, and marking of potential anatomical hazards (such as arteries or nerves) during the operation, and providing visual cues to help surgeons and surgical team protect these structures; and

advancing a training tools and education feature set which allows multiple team members to work together in real time by annotating, highlighting and drawing on a shared visual display of the surgical field to communicate and provide expert support.

During 2023 we entered into an agreement transfers ownershipwith NVIDIA to allow us to enhance the capabilities of the SurgiBot System assets, while the Company retains the option to distribute or co-distribute the SurgiBot System outsideISU. Using a suite of China. Upon completion of the transfer of all SurgiBot System assets, GBILNVIDIA tools, we will have the SurgiBot System manufactured in Chinarefine ISU features like digital tags, 3D measurement and obtain Chinese regulatory clearance from the China Food and Drug Administration, or CFDA, while entering into a nationwide distribution agreement with China National Scientific and Instruments and Materials Company, or CSIMC, for the Chinese market.  The agreement provides the Company with proceeds of at least $29 million, of which $7.5 million was received in December 2017. An additional $7.5 million is expected to be received by March 31, 2018, which includes a $3.0 million equity investment at $2.33 per share. The remaining $14 million, representing minimum royalties, will be paid beginning at the earlier of receipt of Chinese regulatory approval or five years.

enhanced intra-operative camera control. We believe that future outcomesthe collection and analysis of minimally invasive surgerysurgical data transformed into insights, and when shared with our physicians, will enhance surgical planning, surgeon education and training, and promote better patient outcomes.

During 2023 we announced a multi-year collaboration with Google Cloud to integrate Google Cloud’s secure cloud data architecture and machine learning technologies to further expand cloud capabilities. The Asensus Cloud is being designed to enable customer access to a web portal and/or mobile application that can provide data, analytics and/or insights to assist in pre-operative surgical planning, post-operative surgical analysis and best practices guidance.

We are also developing an ISU that can be enhanced through our combination of more advanced tools andutilized on a stand-alone basis apart from robotic functionality, which are designed to: (i) empower surgeons with improved precision, dexterity and visualization; (ii) improve patient satisfaction and enable a desirable post-operative recovery; and (iii) provide a cost-effective robotic system, compared to existing alternatives today, for a wide range of clinical applications. Our strategy is to focus onsurgery. We believe, given the development and commercialization ofmarket opportunity in traditional laparoscopic procedures, the Senhance System.

The Company operates in one business segment. Please see the disclosure in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Segments” in the Notesdata collected from such stand-alone units will add significantly to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8cumulative digital database and help to accelerate development of this Annual Report regarding our business operations ininnovative solutions across the U.S.surgical continuum to reduce complications and elsewhere.improve efficiency.

Market Overview

Over the past twothree decades, laparoscopic surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. In laparoscopic surgery, multiple incisions are necessary to provide surgical access ports. Carbon dioxide gas insufflation is then used to create room in the body cavity, and long rigid instruments are introduced through ports placed in the incisions to perform surgical tasks. Millions of laparoscopic surgical procedures across a broad range of clinical applications are now performed each year worldwide, though many surgeries are still performed in an open fashion.

While laparoscopy has improved upon the invasive nature of many previously open procedures, it still has many limitations. Traditional, or rigid, laparoscopy still requires multiple incisions to achieve the visualization and instrument triangulation required to perform successful surgery. RigidTraditional laparoscopy also creates physical challenges by forcing the surgeon’s hands and arms into awkward angles, requiring the surgeon to hold instruments in fixed positions for long periods of time and requiring an assistant to stabilize and move a laparoscopic camera. Another challenge associated with rigid laparoscopic surgery is the creation of a cumbersome and potentially tissue-damaging fulcrum at the patient’s abdominal wall where instruments are manipulated. Nearly all laparoscopic instruments are rigid instruments that lack internaldistal articulation to enhance dexterity in complex tasks. Most laparoscopic surgeries are performed with two-dimensional, (2-D)or 2-D, visualization of the operative field, making depth perception difficult.


Despite such limitations, traditional laparoscopy remains the prevalent technique in minimally invasive surgery.MIS. We believe that robotic devices that replicate laparoscopic motion are more comfortablestraightforward for surgeons to adopt, thereby increasing the opportunity to enhance traditional surgical methods with robotics.adopt. Our Senhance System mimicsis designed to mimic laparoscopic surgery. The Senhance System is focused on the laparoscopic surgical market as we believe it separates us from our competitors and allows surgeons to perform MIS which provide improved patient outcomes compared to open surgery, while utilizing fully reusable tools, smaller instruments to broaden applicability of the laparoscopic method, including in pediatric cases, and the additional Senhance System technology such as the ISU with its Augmented Intelligence capabilities.

2

Robotic and computer controlledcomputer-controlled assistance have developed as technologies that offer the potential to improve upon many aspects of the laparoscopic surgical experience. Hundreds of thousands of robotic-assisted surgicalAccording to DRG Global Market’s Laparoscopic Surgical Robotic Devices (September 2022), the existing laparoscopic market for soft tissue abdominal surgery is up to 19 million procedures are now performed each year worldwide, but they still represent a small fraction of the total laparoscopic procedures performed. While initialannually. Initial widespread adoption of robotic-assisted surgery was focused on urologic and gynecologic procedures that were primarily performed in an open fashion prior to robotics, but more recently developed robotic approaches like the Senhance System have been applied to many other clinical applications, particularly in general surgery.

Despite recent advances and new entrants into the market, we believe there remain many limitations associated with current robotic-assisted surgery systemssystems.

We digitize the surgical interface between the surgeon and the patient by providing a computer controller interface for the surgeon to manipulate surgical instruments and move the visualization system.  We believe image analytics technology will help accelerate and drive meaningful adoption of the Senhance System and, when developed, the LUNA System, and allow us to continue to expand our capabilities adding new Augmented Intelligence and decision support capabilities in the future. In addition, we believe our focus on expanding surgical data to include pre- and post-operative intelligence will help in surgical planning, review and overall evaluation.

Historical advances in surgery have largely focused on incremental advancements in surgical tools and techniques targeted at reducing the invasiveness of procedures. When we introduced the Senhance platform, our intention was to help surgeons minimize surgical variability in a cost-effective manner while also helping to offset the increasing physical and cognitive demands on surgeons. The next logical step in the progression is looking for ways to deliver real-time Augmented Intelligence and actionable analytics which we believe will take us from digital laparoscopy to Performance-Guided Surgery.

The global digital surgery technologies market continues to expand with increased investment in research and development of digital tools and capabilities. We have seen technological advancements in Augmented Intelligence, the Internet of Things, or IoT, big data capture, extended reality, or XR, offerings and digitalization of surgery. We believe we are well positioned, with our ISU, TRUST™ Registry and learnings from our Senhance System to advance our footprint in digital surgery and provide products that can be used in connection with laparoscopic surgeries.to add value throughout the surgical process.

Product Overview

We are addressing the challenges in laparoscopy and robotic-assisted surgery with innovativetechnologically advanced products and product candidates that leverage the best features of both approaches to minimally invasive surgery.MIS. We are also addressing the need for clinically relevant data and analysis through our PGS offerings.

From our inception, we have devoted a substantial percentage of our resources to research and development and start-up activities, consisting primarily of product design and development, clinical studies, manufacturing, recruiting qualified personnel and raising capital.  We are a data driven company that expects to continue to invest in research and development, market development, and generation and analysis of clinical evidence as we implement our strategy. As a result, we will need to generate significant revenue in order to achieve profitability. The Company operates in one business segment.

The Senhance Surgical System

On September 18, 2015, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, or the Purchase Agreement, with Sofar S.p.A., or Sofar, as seller, Vulcanos S.r.l., as the acquired company, and TransEnterix International, Inc., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company which was incorporated in September 2015, as buyer. The closing of the transactions occurred on September 21, 2015  pursuant to which the Company acquired allthe Senhance System and related assets and personnel, or the Senhance Acquisition. The closing occurred on September 21, 2015.

The Senhance System addresses key challenges for laparoscopic surgeons and hospitals by delivering the benefits of robotics with improved control of the membership interestssurgical field, enhanced visualization and camera control and improved ergonomics, coupled with the familiarity of Vulcanos from Sofar (now known aslaparoscopic motion and consistent per-procedure costs.

3

Our focus over the last few years has been on seeking regulatory approvals and clearances for the Senhance Acquisition), and changed the name of Vulcanos to TransEnterix Italia S.r.l. For a description of the Senhance AcquisitionSystem and related transactions, see the disclosure titled “Senhance Acquisitionproduct offerings and Related Transactions” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussioninstruments and Analysispursuing commercialization of Financial Conditionour products. The following chart describes our success in achieving regulatory clearances and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report.approvals to date.

Product/Indications

FDA Clearance

CE Mark

Other Approvals

Senhance System

October 2017

January 2012

Taiwan – April 2018

Japan – May 2019

Russian Federation – December 2020

Indications for Use of Senhance System

●        Initial general surgery indications for laparoscopic colorectal and gynecologic surgery procedures

October 2017

N/A

N/A

●        Extended to cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair

May 2018

N/A

N/A

●        Extended to hiatal and paraesophageal hernia, sleeve gastrectomy, and sacrocolpopexy

March 2021

N/A

N/A

●        General surgery indications

March 2021

General laparoscopic surgical procedures and laparoscopic gynecologic surgery including a total of 31 labeled procedures, including benign and oncologic procedures, laparoscopic inguinal, hiatal and paraesophageal hernia, sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy

For adult and pediatric laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic surgery, as well as limited adult thoracic surgeries excluding cardiac and vascular surgery and surgeries in direct contact with central nervous systems

Japan – regulatory approval and reimbursement for 98 laparoscopic procedures – July 2019

Additional 26 laparoscopic procedures approved for reimbursement in Japan during 2022

●        Pediatric indications

March 2023

February 2020

N/A

●        Intelligent Surgical Unit, or ISU

Initial - March 2020

Expansion of Augmented Intelligence in August 2021

January 2021

Expansion of Augmented Intelligence in January 2023

Japan - December 2020

Instruments and Other Products

●        5mm articulating instruments

July 2021

November 2018

Japan - October 2022

●        3mm diameter instruments

October 2018

July 2017

   Taiwan - November 2018

Japan - October 2019

●        Senhance ultrasonic system

January 2019

September 2018

Japan - October 2020

●        3mm and 5mm hooks

5mm July 2019

3mm November 2019

December 2019

Japan - December 2020

The Senhance System is a multi-port robotic surgery system whichthat allows up to four arms to control robotic instruments and a camera. The system builds on the success of laparoscopy by enhancing the traditional features that surgeons have come to expect from existing products and by addressing some of the limitations associated with robotic surgery systems for laparoscopic procedures. The Senhance System also offers responsible economics to hospitals by offeringthrough its robotic technology coupled with reusable standard instruments withthat yield minimal additional costs per surgery when compared to laparoscopy. The Senhance System has been granted ais CE Markmarked in Europethe EU for laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic surgery, as well as limited adult thoracic operations excluding cardiac and vascular surgery. In April 2017, the Company submitted a 510(k) application to the FDA for the Senhance System. On October 13, 2017, the Company received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for usesurgery, and surgeries in laparoscopic colorectal and gynecologic surgery.  The Senhance System is available for sale in the U.S., the EU and select other countries.direct contact with central nervous systems.

4

Key features of the Senhance System are:

Haptic Feedback: The Senhance System’s haptic feedback feature provides the surgeon with the ability to feel the tissue response of the body during a procedure.

Fully Reusable, Autoclavable Instrumentation: The Senhance System offers standard instrumentation that is cleaned and sterilized using current autoclave technology that does not require additional, non-standard sterilization methods, and that has no pre-set limitation on number of uses that require them to be disposed. Exceptions to this are ultrasonic disposals and articulating instruments;

Enhanced Vision, Eye-Tracking Camera Control: The Senhance System is compatible with 3DHD, vision technology, which provides the surgeon with additional depth and spatial relation of organs; and a tremor free view of the surgical field and is centered in the surgeon’s field of vision. Eye-tracking camera control, allows hands free, surgeon-controlled visualization;

Intelligent Surgical Unit or ISU: The ISU enables machine vision capabilities providing the ability to recognize certain objects and locations in the surgical field. This capability enhances visualization and camera control over previously available surgical technologies, and provides the foundation for additional Augmented Intelligence capabilities, with a number of enhancements added and FDA-cleared in 2021 and CE marked in early 2023. Additionally, the ISU improves surgical team collaboration by seamlessly sharing the surgeon’s console view in real-time across the entire operating room. The most recently cleared Augmented Intelligence features available in the U.S., Japan and the EU include 3D point-to-point measurement, advanced endoscopic control modalities, and intra-operative surgeon digital tagging.

Articulating Instruments: These instruments improve accessibility and reach around critical structures, providing two additional degrees of freedom, when working in deep anatomical spaces. They optimize efficiency for the surgeon;

Haptic Feedback: The Senhance System’s haptic feedback feature heightens the surgeon’s sensing of pressure/tension throughout the surgical procedure; haptics provides the surgeon with the ability to feel the tissue response of the body during a procedure;

Laparoscopic Motion: Digital laparoscopy maintains familiar motions, tools, and techniques that are similar to the motion used during traditional laparoscopic surgeries;

Improved Ergonomics: Ergonomic seating for the surgeon throughout the procedure helps to reduce fatigue and risk of musculoskeletal injuries;

E-Fulcrum: A digital fulcrum, setting a dynamic virtual pivot point, helps to potentially minimize incision trauma;

Open-Platform Architecture: The Senhance System allows the use and integration of existing OR technologies to maximize benefit from capital investments and support surgeon preference (e.g., trocars, electrosurgical units, insufflators, select vision systems, etc.); and

View of the Sterile Field: The Senhance System offers the user an open view of the operating room and sterile field from the ergonomically-designed console.

Enhanced Vision: The Senhance System is compatible with 3DHD vision technology and gives the surgeon the ability to move the camera via eye movement so that the camera is centered in the surgeon’s field of vision.

Laparoscopic Motion: The Senhance System utilizes laparoscopic motion that is similar to the motion used during traditional laparoscopic surgeries.

View of the Sterile Field: The Senhance System offers the user an open view of the operating room and sterile field from the console.

Reusable, Autoclavable Instrumentation: The Senhance System offers instrumentation that is cleaned and sterilized using current autoclave technology that does not require additional, less standard sterilization methods, and that has no pre-set limitation on number of uses that requires them to be disposed.  

The Senhance System is manufactured for us by third partythird-party contract manufacturers. We or our manufacturers acquire raw materials and components of the Senhance System from vendors, some of which are sole suppliers. We believe our relationships with our vendors and manufacturing contractors are good. We further believe that we have the manufacturing capacity and inventory reserves to meet our anticipated Senhance System sales for the foreseeable future. We are currently taking steps to develop redundant manufacturing and supply alternatives.


SurgiBot

2023 Senhance Surgical System Programs

The SurgiBotSenhance System is designedavailable for sale in Europe, the United States, Japan, Taiwan, the CIS and other selected countries. We also enter into lease arrangements with certain qualified customers. For some lease arrangements, the customers are provided with the right to utilize flexible instruments through articulating channels controlled directly bypurchase the surgeon, with robotic assistance, whileleased Senhance System during or at the surgeon remains patient-side withinend of the sterile field. In June 2015,lease term (which we refer to as a Lease Buyout). We define the Company submittedinitiation of a 510(k) applicationSenhance Surgical program as entering into an agreement to purchase or lease, and subsequently utilizing a Senhance System. Throughout 2023, we initiated eight Senhance System programs, one in the United States, one in Germany, one in Romania, three in Japan and two in the Commonwealth of Independent States, or CIS region.

5

Pediatric Update

During 2023, we received regulatory clearance from the FDA for the SurgiBot System. On April 19, 2016,Senhance System, making the FDA notifiedSenhance System the Company that the SurgiBotfirst cleared digital laparoscopic or robotic surgery product offering 3mm instruments. The one Senhance System did not meet the criteria for substantial equivalence based on the data and information submitted by TransEnterixplacement in the 510(k) submission. FollowingU.S. in 2023 was for pediatric indications, growing our global Senhance System pediatric placements in 2023 to four.

Procedure Volumes

In 2023, surgeons performed over 3,550 procedures utilizing the FDA determination,Senhance System, representing a 13% increase over the previous year. These procedures included general surgery, gynecology, urology, colorectal, bariatric and pediatric surgical procedures.

Senhance Connect

Senhance Connect is a tele-presence platform that allows surgeons in May 2016,an operating room to connect with and communicate with other Senhance surgeons in other locations. The process allows for streaming of multiple operating room camera views and an endoscopic view simultaneously, and allows for two-way screen sharing and annotation. This product is part of PGS, enabling the Company implementedability to provide real-time digital collaboration capabilities to surgeons facilitating best practice sharing and surgical proctoring to a restructuring plan.  The restructuring plan:  (1) reduced the Company’s workforce; (2) abandoned certain equipment relatedwider audience. Additionally, this expands surgeon flexibility and is more cost effective, enabling broader global access to the SurgiBot System; (3) cancelled contracts relatedclinical excellence.

Senhance Simulation

Senhance Simulation is a mobile platform part of our PGS offering and designed to the SurgiBot System; (4) wrote down inventory related to the SurgiBot System; and (5) wrote off certain patents.  After interactionsintegrate with the FDA,Senhance System. It allows surgeons to practice at the Company determined thatconsole through a new 510(k) application wouldseries of virtual exercises, potentially minimizing the need to be submitted in order to obtain clearance for the SurgiBot System.schedule and secure lab-based training activities with robotic manipulator arms.

Please see “Business - Overview” in this Item 1 of this Annual Report for a description of the 2017 agreement regarding the sale of the SurgiBot System assets. 

Products in DevelopmentClinical Registry (TRUST)

We are workingbelieve TRUST is the largest multi-specialty digital laparoscopy registry in the industry. In 2023, we continued to expandleverage the growing body of real-world clinical data through the utilization of our portfolioTRUST clinical registry, which is aimed at providing a research tool that enables physicians to monitor safety, efficacy, and feasibility of robotic assisted surgical instruments, accessoriesinterventions in a variety of abdominal, thoracic, urologic and other products to complimentgynecologic surgical cases using the Senhance System. We arealso continued to drive enrollment as well as support peer-reviewed publications through this registry.

Clinical Validation

During 2023, there were nine peer-reviewed clinical papers published providing further support for the clinical utility of the Senhance Surgical System across pediatric, gynecology, general surgery, urology, and colorectal procedures demonstrating the utility breadth and the complexity of procedures being performed with the device.

ISU and Digital Solutions

Our ISU is a real-time intra-operative surgical image analytics platform that leverages Augmented Intelligence to help reduce surgical variability and provides tools to reduce a surgeon’s cognitive fatigue. It is currently focusedused to enable machine vision capabilities on the developmentSenhance System and regulatorycollect clinical data related to surgical procedures. The ISU was developed using image analytics technology that we acquired as part of our October 2018 acquisition of the assets, intellectual property and highly experienced multidisciplinary personnel of Medical Surgical Technologies, Inc., or MST, an Israeli-based medical technology company. In March 2020, we received FDA clearance for the ISU. On September 23, 2020, we announced the first surgical procedures successfully completed using the ISU. In January 2021, we received CE mark certification for the ISU, allowing us to expand our Augmented Intelligence capabilities to all global areas accepting the CE mark. We received clearance from the FDA for additional Augmented Intelligence features of the ISU in August 2021, and approval for enhanced Augmented Intelligence features for our CE mark certification in January 2023.

The ISU enables machine vision-driven control of the camera for a surgeon by responding to commands and recognizing certain objects and locations in the surgical fields and allows a surgeon to change the visualized field of view using the movement of their instruments. The newest ISU features expand upon these capabilities and introduce additional advanced energy instruments, articulating instrumentsfeatures including 3D measurement, digital tagging, and 3 mm instrumentsenhanced camera control based on real-time data while performing surgery. The regulatory review of such expanded capabilities, which included a review of the Senhance System platform, made Senhance one of the first robotic surgical systems to be certified through the new, more rigorous EU Medical Device Regulation, or MDR, process.

6

We are continuing to advance the utility of the ISU for the Senhance System.  System while also adding such capabilities to the standalone ISU and the LUNA System in development.

Revenues

InOur digital solutions are the year ended December 31, 2017, we had six customersfeatures, products and platforms that are enabled by data, generated through the digitization of the interface between the surgeon and the patient, and deployed via software. Our digital solutions are a foundational component of our PGS strategy enabling the delivery of insights in Europe, one customerpre-operative and post-operative settings, while continuously enhancing our real-time, intra-operative Augmented Intelligence offerings. Currently, commercially available digital solutions are largely deployed via the ISU in the U.S.,form of Augmented Intelligence applications including automatic camera control, digital tagging, and one customerdigital measurement. To develop these and future digital solutions, we designed and deployed the Asensus Cloud, which has been architected to efficiently manage unique surgical data automatically transferred via connected ISUs and additional sources. The Asensus Cloud provides a secure, scalable, and efficient platform for data storage, data use and computing in Asia, who accounted for 61%, 18%,machine learning model development, business model innovation and 21% of our revenue. In the year ended December 31, 2016, we had one European customer, Humanitas Hospital in Milan, Italy, who accounted for 100% of our revenue. In the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had no revenue. The Company is not dependent on current customers. Please see the disclosure in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Segments”future analytics delivery via portals and dashboards. We believe these analytics solutions will address numerous challenges in the Notespre-operative planning and post-operative assessment phases of surgery, enhancing training as well as continuing education, to help advance Performance-Guided Surgery and promote consistently superior outcomes.

Instruments and Other Products

Instruments

We successfully obtained FDA clearance and CE Mark for a number of instruments, including, our Consolidated Financial Statements3mm diameter instruments, our 3mm and 5mm hooks, and articulating instruments. The 3mm instruments enable the Senhance System to be used for micro laparoscopic surgeries, allowing for tiny incisions. We currently offer approximately 80 instruments and accessories in Item 8 of this Annual Report regardingour portfolio.  We have also designed the geographic locations of our revenues and assetsSenhance System so that third-party manufactured instruments can be easily adapted for use.

Our articulating instruments were commercially launched in the U.S. and elsewhere.Japan in the fourth quarter of 2022.

Other Products

The Senhance ultrasonic system is an advanced energy device used to deliver controlled energy to ligate and divide tissue, while minimizing thermal injury to surrounding structures.

Our Performance-Guided Surgery Initiative

Performance-Guided Surgery builds upon our foundation of digital laparoscopy by adding Augmented Intelligence enabled by our machine vision and deep learning capabilities through all surgical phases to help guide improved decision making, enrich collaboration, and enhance predictability for all surgeons (independent of skill level and experience). Our Performance-Guided Surgery strategy is comprised of three strategic pillars:

enhanced robotic precision and manipulation capabilities, via the Senhance System today and, when developed and cleared, the LUNA System;

expanded intra-operative Augmented Intelligence providing clinical decision support to the surgeon via the ISU; and

integration of cloud and big data-enabled solutions to harness best practices across pre-, intra- and post-operative settings, and make them available to surgeons around the world via the Asensus Cloud.

During 2023, we developed and piloted with select Asensus Cloud connected customers across the US & EU, two iterative versions of our customer portal website with an analytics dashboard and video library. The analytics dashboard provides a variety of potentially useful information for both the surgeon and OR administration, including the number of cases completed per month, average case times compared to global averages, procedure time trends, and frequency of instrument and digital feature use with Senhance. The video library offers case specific information in addition to the endoscopic procedure video files, such as a timeline of events to help track time of setup, frequency of warnings, and times when various instruments were in use. This is the first of our customer-facing, cloud-enabled solutions related to the third strategic pillar noted above. We believe that leveraging stored videos and surgical procedure data analysis from the ISU and Asensus Cloud will provide valuable insights for both post-operative analysis and pre-operative planning.

7

Our Performance-Guided Surgery strategy leverages our capabilities across robotics, Augmented Intelligence and cloud/big data and will be executed across all three phases of surgery, including:

Pre-operative - in what we call “intelligent preparation,” our machine learning models will take data from procedures done utilizing our current Senhance System with the ISU, such as tracking surgical motion and instrument selection, to create a large and constantly expanding database of surgeries to enable surgeons to better inform their surgical approach and setup;

Intra-operative – we believe the Senhance System provides, and the LUNA System will provide, “perceptive real-time guidance” for intra-operative tasks, allowing surgeons performing a procedure with such robotic system and ISU to execute multiple tasks while benefitting from the collective knowledge of other successful robotic-based procedures delivered through Augmented Intelligence in real time. Not only does this have the potential to provide the surgeon with a pathway to better outcomes, but we also believe it will ultimately help reduce the cognitive load of the surgeons, enabling more sustained peak performance over time and reducing risk of burn-out; and

Post-operative – finally, by tapping into the vast amount of data captured during procedures, surgeons and operating room staff will have access to “performance analytics” with actionable assessments of their performance giving them the information needed to constantly and consistently improve. We intend to establish a new standard of descriptive, diagnostic, predictive and prescriptive analytics to improve not only the skills of surgeons but move towards accessible best-practice-sharing that bridges the global surgical team community.

We believe that future outcomes of MIS will be enhanced through our combination of more advanced tools such as Augmented Intelligence solutions and robotic functionality which are designed to:

empower surgeons with improved precision, ergonomics, dexterity, visualization, perceptive real-time guidance and surgical decision support;

offer high patient satisfaction and enable more predictable post-operative recovery; and

provide a cost-effective robotic system, compared to existing alternatives today, for a wide range of clinical applications and operative sites within the healthcare system.

Factors plaguing the healthcare industry that amplify the urgency for Performance-Guided Surgery include:

Value-based care is shifting a greater responsibility for poor quality and inefficiency to hospitals and physicians; and

Patients are presenting with more complex conditions and treating them becomes more complicated. The absolute number of patients seeking care is increasing, and many more patients have multiple chronic conditions than they did a generation, or even a decade, ago.

These factors make it the ideal time to integrate advanced technology in the operating room.

8

Business Strategy

Our currentstrategy is to focus on the realization of Performance-Guided Surgery through the continued collection of surgical data via the ISU and Asensus Cloud leveraging the Senhance System and by other means of non-robotic laparoscopic surgery, while completing the design and development of the LUNA System and its capabilities. We believe that:

the LUNA System, if successfully developed and approved for use, will dramatically improve our ability to offer digital solutions to surgeons to promote better patient outcomes;

the ISU and Asensus Cloud will enable the structured acquisition, processing and analysis of surgical video and data and glean insights to better inform our Augmented Intelligence engines to help reduce surgical variability and drive consistently superior outcomes for patients;

laparoscopic robotic surgery will need to continue to evolve given the pressures of value-based healthcare and existing operating room inefficiencies, surgical variability, and workforce challenges;

with our robotic surgery products, surgeons can benefit from the haptic feedback for better connection to the patient, enhanced three-dimensional, high definition, or 3DHD, vision, and open console design to better connect the surgeon with the operating room; and

patients will continue to benefit from minimally invasive options, offering better overall patient outcomes than other MIS surgical techniques.

We continue the market development for and commercialization of the Senhance System, which digitizes laparoscopic MIS. The Senhance System is the first and only multi-port, digital laparoscopy platform designed to maintain laparoscopic MIS standards while providing digital benefits such as haptic feedback, robotic precision, improved ergonomics, advanced instrumentation including 3mm micro laparoscopic instruments, 5mm articulating instruments, eye-sensing camera control and fully-reusable standard instruments to help maintain per-procedure costs similar to traditional laparoscopy.

Our strategy is to focus our resources on the commercializationmarket development of digital surgery to create a new and unique market segment for Performance-Guided Surgery, currently with the Senhance System.System, the ISU and currently offered instruments, and with the LUNA System in the future, to generate procedural data to inform and elevate practice in real time.

We believe that:

our Performance-Guided Surgery framework, which focuses on leveraging robotic technologies, Augmented Intelligence and machine learning capabilities and cloud and data connectivity will assist in reducing variability in surgery, drive more predictable outcomes, optimize resources and costs, and resonate with hospital systems that seek to employ innovative healthcare strategies;

the Senhance System is easier to use in MIS, particularly for surgeons well versed in laparoscopic technique;

markets outside of the United States, particularly where laparoscopic surgery is more heavily utilized, such as Japan, may more readily adopt the use of the Senhance System;

because of the capital-intensive nature of the purchase of a robotic system, our strategy to lease the Senhance System to additional hospitals will increase our placements and use of our systems;

there are a number of hospitals and an increasing number of ambulatory surgery centers internationally and in the United States that can benefit from the addition of robotic-assisted MIS and, through the Senhance System, lower operational costs as contrasted with other robotic systems;

with the Senhance System, surgeons can benefit from the security of haptic feedback, enhanced 3DHD vision and open-platform architecture consistent with current laparoscopic surgery procedures;

the addition of advanced energy instruments, 3mm instruments and 5mm articulating instruments for the Senhance System will help to increase adoption of our products in the laparoscopic surgery market;

leveraging haptic feedback, 3mm instruments, independent arms and lower operating cost, the Senhance system is well suited for pediatric surgeries;

a standalone ISU will enable much broader access to Augmented Intelligence solutions, providing better surgeon experience and clinical outcomes in laparoscopic procedures, compared to if all ISUs needed to be part of a robotic system; and

the enablement of image analytics technology, Augmented Intelligence and machine vision capabilities, enabled by the ISU, will help accelerate and drive meaningful adoption of our robotic systems into the future and help clearly differentiate our offering in surgical robotics.

there are a number

9

with the Senhance System, surgeons can benefit from the haptic feedback, enhanced 3DHD vision and open architecture consistent with current laparoscopic surgery procedures;

patients will continue to seek a minimally invasive option for many common general abdominal and gynecologic surgeries, which are addressed by the Senhance System; and

the addition of advanced energy instruments, articulating instruments and 3 mm instruments for the Senhance System will help to increase adoption of our products in the laparoscopic surgery market.

Sales and Marketing

We have recruited a sales and marketing team and have initiated commercialization of the Senhance System in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and limited countries in Asia.  

We utilize distributors in a number of jurisdictions where we do not sell directly.  Our distribution agreements typically provide exclusivity in a specific territory or jurisdiction.

We haveare dependent on growing the number of hospital customers and increasing the number of customers with installed Senhance Systems. Throughout 2023, we initiated eight Senhance surgical programs, one in the U.S., one in Germany, one in Romania, three in Japan and two in the CIS region. We define the initiation of a Clinical Leadership Program with leading surgical centers in EuropeSenhance Surgical program as entering into an agreement to purchase or lease, and the United States to utilize thesubsequently utilizing a Senhance System. We believe the program helps improve our visibility and provides more widespread opportunity for observation of robotic surgery with the Senhance System. In addition, in December 2016 we opened a European training and research and development center in Milan, Italy, and in November 2017 we opened a training and research and development center at the Institute for Surgical Advancement at Florida Hospital Orlando.


Research and Development

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we incurred research and development expenses of approximately       $22.0 million, $29.3 million and $29.7 million, respectively. In 2017, such expenses primarily related to the Senhance System development, including the preparation and submission of regulatory filings with the FDA.  In 2016, such expenses primarily related to the SurgiBot System development and the Senhance System development, including the preparation and submission of regulatory filings. In 2015, such expenses primarily related to the SurgiBot System development, including the preparation and submission of regulatory filings. We fund our research and development expenses primarily from proceeds raised from equity and debt financing transactions. We expect to continue to use equity and debt financing transactions to fund our research and development activities. No customers are obligated to pay any material portion of such research and development expenses.

Intellectual Property

We believe that our intellectual property and expertise is an important competitive resource. Our experienced research and development team has created a substantial portfolio of intellectual property, including patents, patent applications, trade secrets and proprietary know-how. We maintain an active program of intellectual property protection, both to assure that the proprietary technology developed by us is appropriately protected and, where necessary, to assure that there is no infringement of our proprietary technology by competitive technologies.

The following summarizes our current patent and patent application portfolio.

The

As of December 31, 2023, the Company’s patent portfolio includes 24approximately 90 issued or allowed United States patents, and 68over 100 patents issued outside the United States, and more than 90130 patent applications filed in the United States and abroad.internationally.  We own all right, titlerights, titles and interestinterests in all but the approximately 14038 of our patents and patent applications and the restthat are exclusively licensed to us.  We have granted a security interest to our intellectual property, includingus and the approximately 25 patents and patent applications that are non-exclusively licensed to the Lender under our existing loan agreement.  See “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Results of Operations – Debt Refinancing” for a description of our existing loan agreement.us.

 

Several of our issued patents resulted from filings related to the Senhance System.  These include 58 United States patents, and 33approximately 40 patents outside the United States. The earliest to expire USU.S. and non-U.S. patents within this part of our portfolio will remain in force until 2030, and2027. We also have four issued U.S. patents that resulted from filings related to the LUNA System. The earliest to expire non-USof these LUNA-related patents will expireremain in 2027.force until 2039. The patent applications include over 75120 that relate to the Senhance System, the LUNA System, the ISU or other aspects offeatures, instruments, or components for robotic-assisted surgery. Our patents and applications that we acquired from MST relate to image analytics, our digital solutions and robotic surgery, among other things. We intend to continue to seek further patent and other intellectual property protection in the United States and internationally, where available and when appropriate, as we continue our product development efforts.

Some of our issued patents and pending applications for the Senhance System, as well as associated technology and know-how, are exclusively licensed to TransEnterixAsensus Surgical Italia from the European Union. The license agreement with the European Union has a term which runs until the final licensed patent expires unless the agreement is terminated earlier by mutual consent of the parties, for the Company’s convenience, or for breach. The Company is currently in compliance with the terms of this license agreement.

Competition

Our industry is highly competitive, subject to change and significantly affected by new product introductions and other activities of industry participants. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial and human resources than we do and have established reputations with our target customers, as well as worldwide distribution channels that are more established and developed than ours.

There were new entrants in the market for robotic surgery in 2023 and 2022, and some forward steps by a number of existing entrants in 2023. We believe that our focus on the laparoscopic market and our Performance-Guided Surgery initiative help us to remain competitive in this growing field.

There are many competitive offerings in the field of minimally invasive surgery.MIS. Several companies have launched devices that enable reduced incision or single incision laparoscopic surgery with or without robotic assistance.  Our surgical competitors include, but are not limited to: Medtronic plc, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Vicarious Surgical, Inc., Momentis Surgical, Distalmotion SA, Medicaroid and CMR Surgical Ltd. We are aware that more entrants anticipate introducing additional robotic-based instruments in the next few years, including Johnson & Johnson,Johnson.

There are also a number of existing and emerging competitors in the digital surgery space. Some well-established players have and are expanding their digital offerings, such as the Medtronic plc, Applied Medicalacquisition of Digital Surgery with their Touch Surgery offerings and Intuitive Surgical.Surgical with their My Intuitive app and Intuitive Hub platforms. Several smaller companies that are exclusively focused on digital surgery solutions are currently in, or are expected to enter in the near future, the market including, but not limited to Theator Surgical, Activ Surgical and CareSyntax.

In addition to surgical device manufacturer competitors, there are many products and therapies that are designed to reduce the need for or attractiveness of surgical intervention. These products and therapies may impact the overall volume of surgical procedures and negatively impact our business.

Our ability to compete may be affected by the failure to fully educate physicians in the use of our products and products in development, or by the level of physician expertise. This may have the effect of making our products less attractive. Among currently available surgical robotic systems, we expectWe believe the Senhance System to differentiatecan be distinguished from other currently available robotic systems on the basis of (1) overall attractiveness to laparoscopic surgeons due to its ability to provide robotic benefits while leveraging their laparoscopic training and experience, (2) the additions we have made, including the ISU, (3) lower per procedure costs when compared to other robotic systems on the market today; and we(4) increasing indications for use, including pediatric indications. We further expect the Senhance System to differentiate in most cases, its ability to provide the surgeon with valuable tactile feedback.feedback and real-time clinical intelligence to help guide toward better outcomes. Several medical device companies are actively engaged in research and development of robotic systems, digital surgery capabilities or other medical devices and tools used in minimally invasive surgeryMIS procedures. We cannot predict the basis upon which we will compete with new products marketed by others.


Government Regulation of our Product Development Activities

The U.S. government and foreign governments regulate the medical device industry through various agencies, including but not limited to, the U.S. FDA, which administers the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or the FDCA. The design, testing, manufacturing, storage, labeling, distribution, advertising, and marketing of medical devices are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local governmental authorities in the United States, including the FDA, and by similar agencies in other countries, including in the European Union. Any device product that we develop must receive all requisite regulatory approvals or clearances, as the case may be, before it may be marketed in a particular country.

Device Development, Marketing Clearance and Approval

Medical devices are subject to varying levels of pre-market regulatory requirements. The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes: (i) Class I devices are relatively simple and can be manufactured and distributed with general controls; (ii) Class II devices are somewhat more complex and receive greater scrutiny from the FDA and have heightened regulatory requirements;requirements, typically including clearance of a 510(k) notice prior to marketing; and (iii) Class III devices are new, high riskhigh-risk devices, and frequently are permanently implantable or help sustain or support life, and generally require approval of a Pre-Market Approval application, or PMA, by the FDA.

In the United States, a company generally can obtain permission to distribute a new

Our current medical device in one of two ways. The first appliesproducts are subject to any device that is substantially equivalent to a device first marketed prior to May 1976, or to another device marketed after that date, but which was substantially equivalent to a pre-May 1976 device. These devices are either Class I or Class II devices. To obtain FDA clearance to distribute the medical device, a company generally must submit a 510(k)premarket notification and receive an FDA order finding substantial equivalence to a predicate device (pre-May 1976 device or post-May 1976 device that was substantially equivalent to a pre-May 1976 device)clearance under section 510(k) of the FDCA, and permitting commercial distribution of that medical device for its intended use. A 510(k) notification must provide information supporting a claim of substantial equivalence to a single medical device, the predicate device. If clinical data from human experience are required to support the 510(k) notification, these data must be gathered in compliance with investigational device exemption, or IDE, regulations for investigations performed in the United States. The 510(k) process is normally used for products of the type that we are developing and propose to market and sell. To obtain 510(k) clearance, we must submit to the FDA a premarket notification (510(k) notice) demonstrating that the proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a predicate device already on the market. A predicate device is a legally marketed device that is not subject to PMA, generally either a Class I or Class II device. A 510(k) notice must provide information supporting a claim of substantial equivalence to a single medical device, the predicate device, or multiple predicates in certain circumstances. If clinical data are required to support the 510(k) notice, these data must be gathered in compliance with the Investigational Device Exemption, or IDE, regulations for investigations performed in the United States.

If the FDA agrees that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device, it will grant 510(k) clearance, which permits the company to commercially distribute the device for its intended use. If the FDA determines that the device is “not substantially equivalent” to a previously cleared device, the device is automatically designated as a Class III device. The device sponsor must then fulfill more rigorous PMA requirements, or can request a risk-based classification determination for the device in accordance with the “de novo” process, which is a route to market for novel medical devices that are low to moderate risk and are not substantially equivalent to a predicate device. Review times for de novo requests vary widely, and may take in excess of one year. 

The FDA review process for premarket notifications submitted pursuant to Section 510(k) of the FDCA takes, pursuant to statutory requirements, 90 days, but it can take substantially longer if the FDA has questions regarding the regulatory submission. It is possible for a 510(k) clearance proceduresreview process to take from six to eighteentwelve months, depending on the concerns raised by the FDA and the complexity of the device. There is no guarantee that the FDA will “clear” a medical device for marketing, in which casemarketing; if clearance is not granted, the device cannot be distributed in the United States. There is also no guarantee that the FDA will deem the applicable device subject to the 510(k) process, as opposed to the more time-consuming and resource-intensive and problematicde novo process described above or PMA process described below.

After a device receives 510(k) marketing clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change or modification in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) clearance or, depending on the modification, PMA approval. The second, more comprehensive,FDA requires each manufacturer to determine whether the proposed change requires submission of a 510(k) or a PMA in the first instance, but the FDA can review any such decision and disagree with a manufacturer’s determination. If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s determination, the FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or request the recall of the modified device until 510(k) marketing clearance or PMA approval process appliesis obtained. Also, in these circumstances, the manufacturer may be subject to asignificant regulatory fines or penalties.

A new device that is high-risk and not substantially equivalent to a pre-1976 product or that ispredicate device must obtain approval of a PMA prior to be usedcommercial distribution in supporting or sustaining life or preventing impairment.the U.S. These devices are normally Class III devices. For example, most implantable devices are subject to the approval process as a Class III device. Two steps of FDA approval are generally required beforeBefore a company can market a product in the United States that is subject to PMA approval, as opposedit typically must collect clinical data to clearance, as a Class III device. First, a companysupport the intended use of the device, and must comply with IDE regulations in connection with any human clinical investigation of the device. These regulations permit a company to undertake a clinical studydevice conducted in the United States. Prior FDA approval of a “non-significant risk” device without formal FDA approval. Prior express FDA approvalan IDE application is required if the device is a significant risk device. Second,device (as opposed to a “non-significant risk”, or NSR, device), which is typically the case for Class III devices. The FDA must subsequently approve the company’s PMA application, which typically contains, among other things, clinical information acquired under the IDE. Additionally, devices subject to PMA approval may be subject to a panelan Advisory Panel review to obtain marketing approval and are required to pass a factorymanufacturing facility inspection in accordance with the current “good manufacturing practices” standards in orderprior to obtainobtaining marketing approval. The FDA will approve the PMA application if it determines that the data and information in the PMA constitute valid scientific evidence and finds that there is reasonable assurance that the device is safe and effective for its intended use. The PMA process by statute takes 180 days, though it frequently takes substantially longer, than the 510(k) process, approximatelyand can take up to one to two years or more.

However, in A manufacturer of a device approved through the PMA process is not permitted to make changes to the device which affect its safety or effectiveness, including changes to the intended use/indications for use, without first submitting a PMA Supplement application and obtaining FDA approval for that supplement. In some instances, the FDA may find thatrequire clinical trials to support a device is new and not substantially equivalent to a predicate device but is also not a high risk device as is generally the case with Class III PMA devices. In these instances FDA may allow a device to be down classified from Class III to Class I or II. The de novo classification option is an alternate pathway to classify novel devices of low to moderate risk that had automatically been placed in Class III after receiving a “not substantially equivalent,” or NSE, determination in response to a 510(k) notification. The regulations have also been amended to allow a sponsor to submit a de novo classification request to the FDA for novel low to moderate risk devices without first being required to submit a 510(k) application. These types of applications are referred to as “Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation” or “de novo.” In instances where a device is deemed not substantially equivalent to a Class II predicate device, the candidate device may be filed as a de novo application which may lead to delays in regulatory decisions by the FDA. FDA review of a de novo application may lead the FDA to identify the device as either a Class I or II device and worthy of either an exempt or 510(k) regulatory pathway.Supplement.

The Company believes the Senhance System and many related products are Class II devices as evidenced by the Company’s recentlyour cleared 510(k) premarket notification.notices. The Company intends to further develop the product line by adding additional instrumentation


to and accessories for use withexpanding the capabilities of the Senhance System.  At this time, the Company believes that the items under development are Class II devices subject to 510(k) premarket notification.clearance. The FDA might find that the 510(k) submission does not provide the evidence required to prove that the additional instruments or accessories for use with the Senhance System are substantially equivalent to marketedlegally-marketed Class II devices. If that were to occur, the Company would be required to undertake either the de novo reclassification process or the even more complex and costly PMA process or perhaps be considered for a de novo reclassification.process. For either the 510(k), de novo, or the PMA process, the FDA could require the Company to conduct clinical trials, which would take more time, cost more money, and pose other risks and uncertainties. The Company does not believe it has any need to, and is not currently planning to conduct, any clinical trials.

Clinical

If needed in the future, clinical studies conducted in the U.S.United States or used in any U.S. application on an unapproved medical device that presents a significant risk require approval from the FDA prior to initiation. Even when a clinical study has been approved by the FDA or deemed approved, the study is subject to factors beyond a manufacturer’ssponsor's control, including, but not limited to, the fact that the institutional review board, or IRB, at a specified clinical site might not approve the study, might decline to renew approval, or might suspend or terminate the study before its completion. There is no assurance that a clinical study at any given site will progress as anticipated. In addition, there can be no assurance that the clinical study will provide sufficient evidence to assure the FDA that the product is safe and effective, a prerequisite for FDA approval of a PMA, or substantially equivalent in terms of safety and effectiveness to a predicate device, a prerequisite for clearance under Section 510(k). clearance. Even if the FDA approves or clears a device, it may limit its intended uses in such a way that manufacturing and distribution of the device may not be commercially feasible.

After clearance or approval to market is given, the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies, upon the occurrence

Regulatory requirements in all jurisdictions where we seek certification, clearance or approval of the device, or require changesour products are continuing to a device, its manufacturing process or its labeling or require additional proof that regulatory requirements have been met.

A manufacturer of a device approved through the PMA process is not permitted to make changesevolve with respect to the device which affect its safety or effectiveness without first submitting a supplement application to its PMAcybersecurity risk and obtaining FDA approvalprevention. Such evolving regulations may prolong the regulatory process for that supplement, prior to marketing the modified device. In some instances, the FDA may require clinical trials to support a supplement application. A manufacturer of a device cleared through the 510(k) process must submit an additional premarket notification if it intends to make a change or modificationour products and products in the device that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, such as a significant change or modification in design, material, chemical composition, energy source, labeling or manufacturing process. Any change in the intended uses of a PMA device or a 510(k) device requires an approval supplement or new cleared premarket notification. development.

Exported devices are subject to the regulatory requirements of each country to which the device is exported, as well as certain FDA export requirements.

Continuing FDA Regulation

After a device is placed on the market, numerous FDA and other regulatory requirements continue to apply. These include:

establishment registration and device listing with the FDA;

establishment registration and device listing with the FDA;

quality system regulations that require manufacturers to follow stringent design, testing, process control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures;

labeling regulations that prohibit the promotion of products for unapproved, i.e. “off label,” uses and impose other restrictions on labeling and promotional activities;

Medical Device Reporting regulations that require manufacturers to report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur;

corrections and removal reporting regulations that require manufacturers to report to the FDA field corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA that may present a risk to health; and

in some cases, requirements to conduct post-market surveillance studies to establish continued safety data.

quality system regulations, which require manufacturers to follow stringent design, testing, process control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures;

labeling regulations, which prohibit the promotion of products for unapproved, i.e. “off label,” uses and impose other restrictions on labeling;

Medical Device Reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur;

corrections and removal reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA field corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA that may present a risk to health; and

requirements to conduct postmarket surveillance studies to establish continued safety data.

We are required to, and have, registered with the FDA as a medical device manufacturer.manufacturer and listed the products that we currently commercialize in the U.S. We must obtain all necessary permits and licenses to operate our business in all regions in which we do business. As manufacturers, we and our suppliers are subject to announced and unannounced inspections by the FDA to determine our compliance with the Quality System Regulation, or QSR (21 CFR Part 820), and other regulations. The QSR also requires, among other things, maintenance of a device master file, device history file, and complaint files. These requirements impose certain procedural and documentation requirements upon us and our third-party manufacturers related to the methods used in and the facilities and controls used for designing, manufacturing, packaging, labeling and storing medical devices. As a manufacturer, we and our contract manufacturers are subject to periodic scheduled or unscheduled inspections by the FDA. Following these inspections, the FDA may assert noncompliance with QSR requirements on a Form 483, which is a report of observations from an inspection, or by way of “untitled letters” or “warning letters” that could cause us or any third-party manufacturers to modify certain activities. A Form 483 notice, if issued at the conclusion of an FDA inspection, can list conditions the FDA investigators believe may have violated QSR or other FDA requirements. We cannot be certain that we or our present or any future third-party manufacturers or suppliers will be able to comply with QSR or other FDA regulatory requirements to the agency’s satisfaction. Failure to comply with these obligations may lead to possible legal or regulatory enforcement action by the FDA.

The FDA has broad regulatory compliance and enforcement powers. If the FDA determines that we failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it can take a variety of compliance or enforcement actions, which may result in any of the following sanctions:

untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

unanticipated expenditures to address or defend such actions;

customer notifications or repair, replacement, refunds, recall, detention or seizure of our products;

operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

refusing or delaying our requests for regulatory approvals or clearances of new products or modified products;

withdrawing a PMA that has already been granted;

refusal to grant export approval for our products; or

criminal prosecution. 

In Europe,the EU, we need to comply with the requirements of the 93/42/EEC Medical Devices Directive, or MDD, for ultrasonic, and appropriately affix the CE Markmark on our products to attest to such compliance. We also comply with (EU) 745/17 Medical Device Regulation, or MDR, for the other products (robotic and instruments), and appropriately affix the CE mark on our products to attest such compliance. Asensus Surgical Italia S.r.l. is the legal manufacturer in the EU. Our products marketed in the EU meet the “Essential Requirements”requirements” of the MDD or of MDR, as applicable, relating to safety and performance. We have undergone verification of our regulatory compliance, or conformity assessment, by a notified bodyNotified Body duly authorized by an EU country and must continue to do so as new products and changes to the products arise.so. The level of scrutiny of such


assessment depends on the regulatory class of the product. We are subject to continued surveillance by our notified bodyNotified Body and will beare required to report any serious adverse incidents to the appropriate authorities. We also must comply with additional requirements of individual countries in which our products are marketed. In the European Community,EU, we are required to maintain certain quality system certifications in order to sell products. These regulations require us or our manufacturers to manufacture products and maintain documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design, manufacturing, testing, labeling and control activities.  As legal manufacturers, we and our suppliers are subject to announced and unannounced inspections by the European Notified Bodies.Bodies and Competent Authorities.

Impact of Regulation

Failure to comply withIn May 2021, the applicable regulatory requirements can result in enforcement actionMedical Devices Directive was replaced by the FDAnew Medical Device Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2017/745), or MDR. Any of our products that were certified under the MDD have been or will have to be re-assessed by a designated Notified Body according to the new regulation before their CE Certificates of Conformity issued under the MDD expires or in case we want to make a substantial change to any product.  To date, the Senhance System (with the ISU included), instruments, and other international regulatory bodies,adapters for articulating instruments have been certified under the MDR process. The MDR places new requirements regarding labeling, post-market surveillance, and technical documentation on all medical device manufacturers.  In addition, Notified Bodies underwent the transition as well, leading to reduced capacity to take on new clients or review new medical devices for CE mark certification.  Currently, there are certain transitional provisions in place which allow manufacturers to continue benefiting from CE Certificates of Conformity issued under the MDD and therefore provide more time to transition to the new MDR regime. These transitional provisions allow CE Certificates of Conformity issued under the MDD to remain valid until 31 December 2027 for Class IIb implantable devices (and others) and 31 December 2028 for Class IIa devices (and others) under the following main conditions: (1) devices do not present any unacceptable risk to health and safety, (2) devices have not undergone significant changes in design or intended purpose, and (3) the manufacturers should undertake the necessary steps to launch the certification process under the MDR, such as adaptation of their quality management system to the MDR and submission of an application for MDR certification to a Notified Body. Some of our legacy devices in class IIb still require MDR transition (ultrasonic). Full transition to the MDR will take time and resources from our internal personnel and external consultants to gain compliance, which may include, among other things, any ofreduce the following sanctions:

warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;

repair, replacement, refund or seizure of our products;

operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

refusing our requestresources available for market access approvalsexpansion and new product introductions. The time required to obtain a CE Certificate of new products or modifications to existing products;Conformity from a notified body in the EU is lengthy and unpredictable - the MedTech Europe industry association has recently reported a time-to-certification of 13-18 months on average under the MDR across all device categories.

14

withdrawing or suspending clearances or approvals that are already granted;

criminal prosecution; and

disgorgement of profits.

Further, the levels of revenues and profitability of medical device companies like us may be affected by the continuing efforts of government and third partythird-party payors to contain or reduce the costs of health carehealthcare through various means. For example, in certain foreign markets, pricing or profitability of products is subject to governmental control. In the United States, there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, a number of federal and state proposals to implement similar governmental controls.

Therefore, we cannot assure you that any of our products will be considered cost effective, or that, following any commercialization of our products, coverage and reimbursement will be available or sufficient to allow us to manufacture and sell them competitively and profitably.

Health Care Regulation

Our business activities are subject to additional healthcare regulation and enforcement by the federal government and by authorities in the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. SuchThese laws include without limitation,the following:

The U.S. Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving anything of value to induce (or in return for) the referral of business, including the purchase of a particular medical device reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federally financed healthcare programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between medical device manufacturers on one hand and purchasers on the other. A violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute may be established without proving actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it. The government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act. Although there are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly and practices that involve remuneration to those who purchase medical devices, including certain discounts, or engaging such individuals as consultants, speakers or advisors, may be subject to scrutiny if they do not fit squarely within the exception or safe harbor.

The federal civil False Claims Act, or FCA, which prohibits, among other things, any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment of federal funds, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement material to a false claim. Actions under the False Claims Act may be brought by private individuals known as qui tam relators in the name of the government and relators may share in any monetary recovery.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and its implementing regulations (collectively “HIPAA”) prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors. HIPAA also prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation, or making or using any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. We may obtain health information from third parties that are subject to privacy and security requirements under HIPAA and we could potentially be subject to criminal penalties if we, our affiliates, or our agents knowingly obtain or disclose individually identifiable health information maintained by a HIPAA-covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by HIPAA.

Many states have privacy laws similar to or more expansive than HIPAA. As noted in “Business‑International Regulation and Potential Impact” we comply with the EU GDPR regulations.

The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to the federal anti-kickback and false claims laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor.

The U.S. Physician Payment Sunshine Act, or Sunshine Act, requires tracking of payments and transfers of value to physicians, certain other health care professionals and teaching hospitals and ownership interests held by physicians and their families, and reporting to the federal government and public disclosure of these data. The failure to report appropriate data accurately, timely, and completely could subject us to significant financial penalties. Other countries and several states currently have similar laws and more may enact similar legislation.

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties are compliant with applicable healthcare laws and federal anti-kickback,regulations will involve the expenditure of appropriate, and possibly significant, resources. Nonetheless, it is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse false claims, privacyor other healthcare laws and security and physician payment transparency laws.regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of such laws that apply to us, we may be subject to significant penalties, including, without limitation, civil, criminal and criminaladministrative penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and imprisonment, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results.

Health Care Reform

A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. By way of example, the United States and state governments continue to propose and pass legislation designed to reduce the cost of healthcare. In March 2010, the Affordable Care Act, or ACA, went into effect, which, among other things, includes changes to the coverage and payment for products under government health care programs. In the United States, there have been, and we expect there to continue to be, a number of legislative and regulatory initiatives, at both the federal and state government levels, to change the healthcare system in ways that, if approved, could affect our ability to sell our products profitably. AtAmong policy makers and payors in the current time,United States and elsewhere, there is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality and/or expanding access. Current and future legislative proposals to further reform healthcare or reduce healthcare costs may limit coverage of or lower reimbursement for the procedures associated with the use of our products. The cost containment measures that payors and providers are instituting and the effect of any healthcare reform initiative implemented in the future could impact our revenue from the sale of our products.

Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. For example, in August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2012 through 2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect in April 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments, will remain in effect through 2031. Sequestration is currently set at 2% and will increase to 2.25% for the first half of fiscal year 2030, to 3% for the second half of fiscal year 2030, and to 4% for the remainder of the sequestration period that lasts through the first six months of fiscal year 2031. In January 2013, President Obama signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, imaging centers, and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.

Some of the provisions of the ACA and related laws have been, and may continue to be, subject to judicial and Congressional challenges, and to modifications in their interpretation or implementation. Congress continues to consider legislation to modify the ACA. It is unclear whether new legislation modifying the ACA will be enacted, and, if so, precisely what the new legislation will provide, when it will be enacted and what impact it will have on the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. We plan to continue to evaluate the effect that the ACA and its possible modification may have on our business.

There has also been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several recent Congressional inquiries and proposed bills designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing and review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer programs. Individual states in the U.S. have also become increasingly active in enacting legislation and implementing regulations designed to control product pricing. We expect that additional foreign, federal and state healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in limited coverage and reimbursement and reduced demand for our products.

There have been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals at the national level in the U.S. and other jurisdictions globally, as well as at some regional, state and/or local levels within the U.S. or other jurisdictions, directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. Such reforms could have an adverse effect on anticipated revenues from product that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain marketing approval and may affect our overall financial condition and ability to develop products.

Significant uncertainty exists regarding the coverage and reimbursement status of products approved by the FDA and other government authorities. In the United States, sales of our products depend in significant part on the availability and adequacy of coverage and reimbursement from third party payors for our product and for services that use our products. Third-party payors include government authorities, managed care providers, private health insurers, and other organizations. The process for determining whether a payor will provide coverage may be separate from the process for setting the reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product or service. Moreover, a payor’s decision to provide coverage does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available to enable us to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development.

Our products are sold or leased to facilities, such as hospitals, and are not defined asfor use in the home such that they are not durable medical equipment. Non-DME devicesDevices such as ours used in surgical procedures are normally paid directly by the hospital or health care provider and not reimbursedpaid separately by payers, but are reimbursed by third-party payors. Instead,payors as part of the hospitalpayment made for the performed surgical procedure when performed on an outpatient basis, or health care provider is reimbursed based onas part of the payment made for the inpatient stay when the patient undergoing the procedure performed and theis an inpatient or outpatient stay.of a hospital. As a result, these types of devices are subject to intensesignificant price competition that can place a small manufacturer at a competitive disadvantage as hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers and health care providersfacilities attempt to negotiate lower prices for products such as the ones we develop and sell.

In March 2010,

Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the Patient Protectionprices charged for, examining the medical necessity, safety, and Affordable Care Act (the “Affordable Care Act”)efficacy of, and assessing the reconciliation law known as Health Carecost-effectiveness of medical procedures, including those that use our products. The U.S. government and Education Reconciliation Act (the “Reconciliation Act,” and, withstate legislatures have shown significant interest in implementing cost containment programs to limit the Affordable Care Act, the “2010 Health Care Reform Legislation”) were enacted into law. The constitutionalitygrowth of the 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation was confirmed twice by the Supreme Court of the United States. Both Congressional leaders and President Trump have announced plans to repeal or modify the 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation.  At this time the Company is not certain as to the impact of federalgovernment-paid health care legislationcosts, including price controls and restrictions on its business.


The 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation subjects manufacturers of medical devicesreimbursement. Any such downward pressure on the reimbursement for the services with which our products are used could limit our ability to realize an excise tax of 2.3%appropriate return on certain U.S. sales of medical devices beginningour investment in January 2013. This excise tax was suspended in December 2015 for two years, and again in January 2018 for an additional two years. If eventually implemented, this excise tax will likely increase our expenses in the future.product development.

Further, the 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation includes the Open Payments Act (formerly referred to as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act), which, in conjunction with its implementing regulations, requires certain manufacturers of certain drugs, biologics, and devices that are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually certain payments or “transfers of value” provided to physicians and teaching hospitals and to report annually ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members during the preceding calendar year. We have provided reports under the Open Payments Act to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services since 2014. The failure to report appropriate data accurately, timely, and completely could subject us to significant financial penalties. Other countries and several states currently have similar laws and more may enact similar legislation.

International Regulation and Potential Impact

Through

Our business activities may be subject to the Senhance Acquisition,Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and similar anti-bribery or anti-corruption laws, regulations, or rules of other countries in which we operate. The FCPA generally prohibits offering, promising, giving, or authorizing others to give anything of value, either directly or indirectly, to a non-U.S. government official in order to influence official action, or otherwise obtain or retain business. The FCPA also requires public companies to make and keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the corporation and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls. Our business is heavily regulated and therefore involves significant interaction with public officials, including officials of non-U.S. governments. Additionally, in many other countries, health care providers are employed by their government, therefore our dealings with these providers are subject to regulation under the FCPA. There is no certainty that all of our employees, agents, suppliers, manufacturers, contractors, or collaborators, will comply with all applicable laws and regulations, particularly given the high level of complexity of these laws. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees, the closing down of facilities, including those of our suppliers and manufacturers, requirements to obtain export licenses, cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries, implementation of compliance programs, and prohibitions on the conduct of our business. Any such violations could include prohibitions on our ability to offer our products in one or more countries as well as difficulties in manufacturing or continuing to develop our products, and could materially damage our reputation, our brand, our international expansion efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees, and our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition.

The Company has expanded intomarket development and commercial activities in a number of international markets and intends to pursue continued expansion.focus on such markets in the near term. Some of these markets maintain unique regulatory requirements outside of or in addition to those of the U.S. FDA and the European Union. The Senhance System is CE marked, which allowsis the basis to allow us to offer the product for sale in a number of jurisdictions, including selectselected countries in Europe, the Middle East and Asia.  Due to the variations in regulatory requirements within territories, the Company may be required to perform additional safety or clinical testing or fulfill additional agency requirements for specific territories. The Company may also be required to apply for registration using third parties within those territories and may be dependent upon the third parties’ successful regulatory processes to file, register and list the product applications and associated labeling, which could lead to significant investments and resource use. These additional requirements may result in delays in international registrations and commercialization of our products in certain countries.

Additionally, the General Data Protection Regulation, or the GDPR, including as implemented in the U.K. and in effect across the European Economic Area, or EEA, imposes many stringent requirements for controllers and processors of personal data (personally identifiable information, or PII), including ensuring the lawfulness of processing personal data (including obtaining valid consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates, where applicable), the processing details disclosed to the individuals, the adequacy, relevance and necessity of the personal data collected, the retention of personal data collected, the sharing of personal data with third parties, the transfer of personal data out of the EEA/UK to third countries including the US, contracting requirements (such as with clinical trial sites and vendors), the use of personal data in accordance with individual rights, the security of personal data and security breach/incident notifications. Restrictions on the ability of companies to transfer personal data from the EEA/U.K. to the United States and other countries, may adversely affect our ability to transfer or receive personal data or otherwise may cause us to incur significant costs to undertake data transfer impact assessments and implement lawful data transfer mechanisms.

Finally, the Japanese Act on the Protection of Personal Information, as amended, includes extraterritorial application, requirements related to data transfers to third parties in foreign countries and data breach reporting obligations that are applicable to our business in Japan.

In addition, we are utilizing distributors and sales agents in various territories throughout Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Africa,the CIS, and need to ensure that our activities, and the activities of our distributors and sales agents, are compliant with local law and U.S. laws governing the sales of medical devices.  We have also established subsidiaries and contracted with third parties in Asia, including Japan and Taiwan, to seek regulatory approvals to offer our products in Asia.  The laws governing the registration, approval, clearance, and sales of medical devices, such as the Senhance System, in multiple jurisdictions are complex, and the failure to comply with such laws in any given jurisdiction could subject us to financial penalties or suspension or termination of our ability to sell our products in the applicable jurisdiction.

Employees

Environmental, Social and Governance

Environmental

As a company, we are committed to encouraging and fostering sustainable practices to support the global environment. We comply with environmental regulations in each of our locations. We have a corporate goal of limiting the use of plastic with paper cups and recyclable materials in all of our locations. Our employees located in our European facilities are encouraged to travel by train rather than aircraft, and some employees benefit from local government incentives to use electric cars. We also put safety first in our locations through the implementation of rigorous safety protocols which are drafted and reviewed with assistance from third-party safety consultants and ongoing training programs. We also ensure health check-ups are completed in those of our locations where such check-ups are mandatory. 

Social

Company Culture

Our employees are passionate about the work they do and thrive in a collaborative environment that fosters creative solutions to complex problems. The Company fosters a significant amount of collaboration and synergy among employees. Team members at any level are encouraged to provide suggestions and input to enable the Company’s success.

Employee Demographics

As of December 31, 2017,2023, we had 121209 employees, including 119 full time207 full-time employees, of whom 89 were in the R&D Department, 16 were in Quality and Regulatory Affairs, 39 were in Marketing and Sales, 30 were in Corporate Administration, and 24 were in Customer Excellence. The increase in employees in our R&D Department relates to the LUNA System development efforts. As of December 31, 2023, approximately 29% of the Company’s workforce were female, and people of color represented approximately 30% of the Company’s workforce, a marked increase from 2022 which we believe resulted from our DEI activities. As of December 31, 2023, approximately 57% of the Company’s employees were in the United States and 43% were outside of the United States. In 2023, our turnover rate was approximately 18% and we hired 36 full-time employees. TheOur turnover rate increased to 2021 levels. We believe the increase was largely related to performance-based terminations and reduced hiring activities.

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI)

We believe in contributing to a society that welcomes diverse voices and values differences in lived experiences, culture, religion, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, and neurodiversity. We are committed to ensuring this same environment for our employees – a culture where individuals feel safe, heard, and respected. We celebrate the uniqueness of our global workforce, especially in a company of our size, and appreciate that only through inclusion, ongoing learning, and partnership can we succeed.

In 2020, we created an internal webpage dedicated to DEI resources for our employees, kicked off a DEI committee and partnered with a DEI alliance to further evolve our DEI efforts. In 2023, we held biweekly meetings of the DEI committee, organized a field trip to the International Civil Rights Center & Museum, attended the Raleigh Chamber’s Diversity, Equity & Inclusivity Conference in July, shared information on our social media pages about relevant events and holidays, and held various cultural, coaching and education events including DEI focused movie watch parties with follow-up discussion groups and volunteering activities. We are also focused on incorporating DEI principles into our governance structure and believe having a mix of backgrounds and experience in our Board composition is essential to understanding and reflecting the needs of our diverse stakeholders. Currently, one of eight board members self-identifies as a woman, and two of our eight Board members self-identify as individuals from underrepresented communities (defined as an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender).

Health & Wellness

Throughout 2023, health and wellness was a key focus of the Company, considersespecially in light of the ongoing pandemic and new variants. Many of our employee communications focused on the physical and mental health of our employees. We remain committed to providing our workforce with flexible remote working schedules to suit their personal needs through this challenging time. We also continue to benchmark all of our health insurance offerings to ensure plan competitiveness.

People Strategy

Our People Strategy is to create and maintain a culture of high performance and accountability through the attraction, engagement and development of expert talent. To enhance our employees’ satisfaction and retention, we offer ongoing training opportunities that support professional growth. We have an annual performance review process for all employees worldwide to review performance and inform compensation recommendations. We compete for top talent with effective recruitment strategies, well-defined roles and attractive total compensation packages. We keep talent engaged through appreciation, communication and the creation of a great work environment. We support employee growth professionally and personally through formal and informal opportunities and leadership support.

Employee Engagement

We partner with Gallup, Inc., a global analytics and advice firm, to monitor and improve the engagement of our workforce. Gallup’s Q12 survey measures employee engagement based on twelve key needs of employees. We utilize survey results to identify strengths and weaknesses and create action plans to improve engagement and ultimately team performance. In 2023, we maintained our high engagement score from the prior year and saw an increase in the percentage of actively engaged employees. We continue to incorporate Gallup’s programs into our overall People Strategy.  

Compensation

In addition to competitive base salaries, we offer incentive-based compensation programs tied to the performance of key objectives. We also provide compensation in the form of retention grants of restricted stock units and/or stock options, which we believe help align longer-term employee incentives with our company performance. Ensuring fair and equitable pay is also an important commitment we make to our employees.

Governance

Our Board of Directors, through its relationshipsNominating and Corporate Governance Committee, evaluates the governance and management practices of the Company. We believe our corporate governance guidelines and structure provide our stockholders with its employees to be good.a dedicated, qualified and skilled board of directors and management team. Our governance structure includes:

annual elections of all board members;

an independent Board chair and separation of the CEO/Chair role;

diversity in skills, gender and ethnicity in our board and management team; and

the ability of stockholders to propose candidates for potential nomination to the board and proposals for consideration by stockholders at annual meetings.

Corporate Information

The Company’s

On February 23, 2021, we changed our corporate name to Asensus Surgical, Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 635 Davis1 TW Alexander Drive, Suite 300, Morrisville,160, Durham, NC 27560. TransEnterix Surgical was originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on July 12, 2006. On September 3, 2013, TransEnterix Surgical merged with and into a merger subsidiary of SafeStitch Medical, Inc. and became a wholly owned subsidiary of SafeStitch in a reverse merger transaction. SafeStitch27703. The Company was originally incorporated on August 19, 1988, as NCS Ventures Corp. under the laws of the State of Delaware. Its name was changed to Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc. on May 31, 1991. On September 4, 2007, SafeStitch acquired SafeStitch LLC, and, in January 2008, changed its name to SafeStitch Medical, Inc. On December 6, 2013, SafeStitch’s name was changed to TransEnterix, Inc. On September 21, 2015, TransEnterix International, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company formed by the Company in conjunction with the Senhance Acquisition, acquired all of the membership interests of Vulcanos and changed the name of Vulcanos to TransEnterix Italia.Delaware corporation.

As of December 31, 2017, the

The active subsidiaries of the Company are TransEnterix International; TransEnterixAsensus Surgical US, Inc., Asensus International, Inc., Asensus Surgical Italia S.r.l.; TransEnterix, Asensus Surgical Europe S.à.R.L; TransEnterix Europe S.à.R.L, Bertrange, Swiss Branch, Lugano; TransEnterix Asia Pte. Ltd.; and, TransEnterix r.l., Asensus Surgical Taiwan Ltd., Asensus Surgical Japan K.K., Asensus Surgical Israel Ltd., Asensus Surgical Netherlands B.V., and Asensus Surgical Canada, Inc.

Available Information

The Company maintains a website at www.transenterix.com.www.asensus.com. We are not incorporating our website by reference into this Annual Report. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics as reviewed and updated on November 8, 2017, is available on our website. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are available free of charge on our website as soon as practicable after electronic filing of such material with, or furnishing it to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, (the “SEC”). This information may be read and copied ator the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. The SEC also maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy statements, and other information about issuers, like TransEnterix, Inc., who file electronically with the SEC. The address of the site is http://www.sec.gov.

 

 

ITEM 1.A.

RISK FACTORS

WeITEM1.A.RISK FACTORS

Our risk factors are currently highly dependent ongrouped into the commercial success of a single product,following categories: (1) Risks Related to the Senhance System.  We cannot give any assurance that the Senhance System can be successfully commercialized.  

We are currently highly dependent on the commercial success of the Senhance System, which is FDA cleared and CE marked. We began our selling efforts for the Senhance System in the fourth quarter of 2015 in Europe and in the fourth quarter of 2017 in the United States.  We have had limited commercial success to date.  We are still in the process of establishing our commercial infrastructure in the U.S.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully commercialize the Senhance System, for a number of reasons, including, without limitation, failure in our sales and marketing efforts, the long sales cycle associated with the purchase of capital equipment, or the potential introduction by our competitors of more clinically effective or cost-effective alternatives.  Failure to successfully commercialize the Senhance System would have a material and adverse effect on our business.

The sales cycle for the Senhance System is lengthy and unpredictable, which will make it difficult for us to forecast revenue and increase the magnitude of quarterly fluctuations in our operating results.

Purchase of a surgical robotic system such as the Senhance System represents a capital purchase by hospitals and other potential customers.  The capital purchase nature of the transaction, the complexityOperation of our product, the relative newness of surgical robotics and the competitive landscape requires usBusiness; (2) Risks Related to spend substantial time and effortOur Status as a Public Company; (3) Risks Related to assist potential customers in evaluating our robotic systems. We must communicate with multiple surgeons, administrative staff and executives within each potential customer in order to receive all approvals on behalf of such organizations. We may face difficulty identifying and establishing contact with such decision makers. Even after initial acceptance, the negotiation and documentation processes can be lengthy. Additionally, our customers may have strict limitations on spending depending on the current economic climate or trends in healthcare management.

We are also expanding the potential market for robotic surgical systems with our focus on laparoscopic surgery.  Such expansion requires a different sales and marketing approach than a focus on open procedures.  We expect our sales cycle to range between four to six quarters per sale.  Each sale could take longer. Any delay in completing sales in a particular quarter could cause our operating results to fall below expectations. We also expect such a lengthy sales cycle makes it more difficult for us to accurately forecast revenue in future periods and may cause revenues and operating results to vary significantly in future periods.  

Although we have expanded our commercial organization, we currently have limited marketing, sales and distribution capabilities. We are distributing our products through direct sales in the U.S. and select countries in Europe, and elsewhere through the use of independent contractor and distribution agreements with companies possessing established sales and marketing operations in the medical device industry.  There can be no assurance that we will be successful in building our sales capabilities. To the extent that we enter into distribution, co-promotion or other arrangements, our product revenue is likely to be lower than if we directly market or sell our products. In addition, any revenue we receive will depend in whole or in part upon the efforts of such third parties, which may not be successful and are generally not within our control. If we are unable to enter into such arrangements on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our products. If we are not successful in commercializing our existing and future products, either on our own or through collaborations with one or more third parties, our future product revenue will suffer and we may incur significant additional losses.

We have procedures in place to require our distributors and sales agents to comply with applicable laws and regulations governing the sales of medical devices in the jurisdictions where they operate.  Failure to meet such requirements could subject us to financial penalties or the suspension or termination of the ability to sell our products in such jurisdiction.  

The surgical robotics industry is increasingly competitive, which can negatively impact our commercial opportunities.

The life sciences industry is highly competitive, and we face significant competition from many medical device companies that are researching and marketing products designed to address minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgery, including new entrants in the competitive market. We are currently commercializing the Senhance System in the U.S. with FDA 510(k) clearance, in Europe which accepts a CE Mark, the Middle East and selected countries in Asia and face significant competition in such markets.  ManyProtection of our competitors, including Intuitive Surgical, have significantly greater financial, manufacturing, marketingIntellectual Property; and product development resources than we do. Some of(4) Risks Related to the medical device companies we compete with or expect to compete with include Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic plc, Applied Medical, Intuitive Surgical, Verb Surgical, Titan Medical and a number of minimally invasive surgical device and robotic surgical device manufacturers and providers of products and therapies that are designed to reduce the need for or attractiveness of surgical intervention. In addition, many other universities and private and public research institutions are or may become active in research involving surgical devices for minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgery.

We are also expanding the potential market for robotic surgical systems with our focus on laparoscopic surgery.  Such expansion may lead to additional competition with companies with sufficiently higher resources than ours.


We believe that our ability to successfully compete will depend on, among other things:

the efficacy, safety and reliabilityRegulation of our products;Business.

our ability

Risks Related to commercialize and market our cleared or approved products;

the completionOperation of our development efforts and receipt of regulatory clearance or approval for instruments and accessories to support the use of the Senhance System;

the cost of ownership and use of our products in relation to alternative devices;

the timing and scope of regulatory clearances or approvals, including any expansion of the indications of use for our products;

whether our competitors substantially reduce the cost of ownership and use of an alternative device;

our ability to protect and defend intellectual property rights related to our products;

our ability to have our partners manufacture and sell commercial quantities of any cleared or approved products to the market;

the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement by third-party payors for the procedures in which our products are used;

the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts; and

acceptance of future products by physicians and other health care providers.

If our competitors market products that are more effective, safer, easier to use or less expensive than our products or future products, or that reach the market sooner than our products, we may not achieve commercial success. In addition, the medical device industry is characterized by rapid technological change. It may be difficult for us to stay abreast of the rapid changes in each technology. If we fail to stay at the forefront of technological change, we may be unable to compete effectively. Technological advances or products developed by our competitors may render our technologies or products obsolete or less competitive.Business

We anticipate that the highly competitive surgical robotics environment can lead our competitors to attempt to slow or derail our commercial progress.  We are using our best efforts to enter the commercial markets effectively and efficiently while maintaining compliance with all regulatory and legal requirements.  Responding to the actions of our competitors will require the attention of our management and may distract the management team from its focus on our commercial operations and lead to increased costs of commercialization, which could have a negative impact on our financial position.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may adversely affect our financial results.

We conduct operations in several different countries, including the U.S. and throughout Europe, and portions of our revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros, and other currencies. Since our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, we must translate revenues, income and expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect during or at the end of each reporting period. We have not historically hedged our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations.  Accordingly, increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar against the Euro and other currencies could materially affect our net operating revenues, operating income and the value of balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies.

Our global operations expose us to additional risks and challenges associated with conducting business internationally.

The international expansion of our business may expose us to risks inherent in conducting foreign operations. These risks include:

challenges associated with managing geographically diverse operations, which require an effective organizational structure and appropriate business processes, procedures and controls;

the increased cost of doing business in foreign jurisdictions, including compliance with international and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations;


currency exchange and interest rate fluctuations and the resulting effect on our revenue and expenses, and the cost and risk of entering into hedging transactions, if we chose to do so in the future;

changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic environment;

trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements or other restrictive actions by U.S. or non-U.S. governments;

potentially adverse tax consequences;

complexities and difficulties in obtaining protection and enforcing our intellectual property;

compliance with additional regulations and government authorities in a highly regulated business;

difficulties associated with staffing and managing foreign operations, including differing labor relations; and

general economic and political conditions outside of the U.S.

The risks that we face in our international operations may continue to intensify as we further develop and expand our international operations.

As we ramp up our manufacturing capabilities we face risks arising from sole suppliers of components and our ability to meet delivery schedules for sales of our products.

The Senhance System is manufactured for us under contract by a third party manufacturer. We or our manufacturer acquire raw materials and components of the Senhance System from vendors, some of which are sole suppliers. Although we believe that we have the manufacturing and inventory reserves to meet our anticipated Senhance System sales for the foreseeable future, we are currently taking steps to develop redundant manufacturing and supply alternatives. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in developing these redundant supply and manufacturing capabilities. If we are not successful, our business operations could suffer.

Because our design, development and manufacturing capabilities are limited, we may rely on third parties to design, develop, manufacture or supply some of our products. An inability to find additional or alternate sources for these services and products could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We have used third-party design and development sources to assist in the design and development of our medical device products. In the future, we may choose to use additional third-party sources for the design and development of our products. If these design and development partners are unable to provide their services in the timeframe or to the performance level that we require, we may not be able to establish a contract and obtain a sufficient alternative supply from another supplier on a timely basis and in the manner that we require.

Our products require precise, high quality manufacturing. We and our contract manufacturers will be subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspection by the FDA and non-U.S. regulatory authorities to ensure strict compliance with the quality systems regulations, current “good manufacturing practices” and other applicable government regulations and corresponding standards. If we or our contract manufacturers fail to achieve and maintain high manufacturing standards in compliance with QSR, we may experience manufacturing errors resulting in patient injury or death, product recalls or withdrawals, delays or interruptions of production or failures in product testing or delivery, delay or prevention of filing or approval of marketing applications for our products, cost overruns or other problems that could seriously harm our business.

Any performance failure by us or on the part of our design and development partners or contract manufacturers could delay product development or regulatory clearance or approval of our products, or commercialization of our products and future products, depriving us of potential product revenue and resulting in additional losses. In addition, our dependence on any third party for design, development or manufacturing could adversely affect our future profit margins. Our ability to replace any then-existing manufacturer may be difficult because the number of potential manufacturers is limited and, in the case of Class III devices, the FDA must approve any replacement manufacturer before manufacturing can begin. It may be difficult or impossible for us to identify and engage a replacement manufacturer on acceptable terms in a timely manner, or at all.


Our stock price has been volatile and may experience additional fluctuation in the future.

The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, highly volatile, and such volatility could cause the market price of our common stock to decrease and could cause you to lose some or all of your investment in our common stock.  During the two year period ended December 31, 2017, the market price of our common stock fluctuated from a high of $6.10 per share to a low of $0.45 per share. The market price of our common stock may continue to fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as:

the announcement of favorable or unfavorable news regarding us, including our product development efforts and regulatory clearance activities;

the achievement of commercial sales of our products;

the announcement of new products or product enhancements by us or our competitors;

developments concerning intellectual property rights and regulatory approvals;

variations in our and our competitors’ results of operations;

changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, if our common stock is covered by analysts;

developments in surgical robotics;

the results of product liability or intellectual property lawsuits;

future issuances of common stock or other securities;

the addition or departure of key personnel;

announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, investments or strategic alliances; and

general market conditions and other factors, including factors unrelated to our operating performance.

Further, the stock market in general, and the market for medical device companies in particular, can experience extreme price and volume fluctuations. Market fluctuations could result in extreme volatility in the price of our common stock, which could cause a decline in the value of our common stock and the loss of some or all of your investment.

We have a history of operating losses, and we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability.

We have a limited operating history. We are not profitable and have incurred losses since our inception. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017accumulated deficit was $144.8$939.4 million, and our accumulated deficitworking capital was $23.8 million as of December 31, 2017 was $447.6 million.  We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with cash received from sales of our products, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months.  

2023. We expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future.future, and these losses will likely increase as we continue to develop and commercialize our products. We will continue to incur research and development and general and administrative expenses related to our operations, and expect to increase our sales and marketing expenses as we increaseto support our sales and marketing activities for the Senhance System in jurisdictions where FDA clearance and CE marking provides authorization for commercial activities.  If our product candidates fail in development or do not gain regulatory clearance or approval, or if our products do not achieve market acceptance, we may never become profitable. Even if we achieveare successful in reducing our expenses or achieving profitability in the future, we may not be able to sustain profitability in subsequent periods.

Our recurring operating losses and negative cash flows raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We will need additional financing to execute our business plan and fund our operations.

Since inception, we have experienced recurring operating losses and negative cash flows and we expect to continue to generate operating losses and consume significant cash resources in the foreseeable future, particularly as we increase our research and development spending as we develop and seek regulatory approval for the LUNA System and enhancements to our digital surgery and Performance-Guided Surgery product offerings. Management has concluded that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of anticipated capital needs in conjunction with past recurring losses and an accumulated deficit. As of December 31, 2023, our accumulated deficit was $939.4 million, and our working capital was $23.8 million. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, together with cash received from product, service, and lease sales will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs into early June 2024. However, we will need additional financing to implement our next generation products strategy. Management's plans to obtain additional resources for the Company may include additional sales of equity, traditional financing, such as loans, entry into strategic collaborations, entry into an out-licensing arrangement or provision of additional distribution rights in some or all of its markets. Management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any or all of its plans. If sufficient funds are not received on a timely basis, the Company would then need to reduce costs further and/or pursue a plan to license or sell its assets, seek to be acquired by another entity, cease operations and/or seek bankruptcy protection. Substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may materially and adversely affect the price per share of our common stock and we may have a more difficult time obtaining financing.

We will require substantial additional funding in the future, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.advance our current plans.

We do not anticipate thatare focused on our development efforts for our products, including the net proceedsLUNA System and enhanced digital solutions, and commercialization of equity financings in 2017 will be sufficient to supportthe Senhance System, ISU and other products, as well as market development offor our products and product candidatesother research and provide usdevelopment activities. We expect increased research and development spend associated with the necessary resources to commercializedevelopment of the SenhanceLUNA System, next generation versions of the ISU and other productsenhanced digital solutions, putting additional pressure on funding requirements as we advance through the lengthy sales cycle. While weregulatory processes and commercialization, if our R&D efforts are currently focused on commercialization of our Senhance System, wesuccessful. We intend to advance multiple additional products through clinical and pre-clinical development in the future. We believe we will need to raise substantial additional capital in the future in order to continue our operationsfund these priorities and achieve our business objectives.

We have an effective shelf registration statement. As of December 31, 2017, we had $100 million available Any delays in raising additional capital will delay the current anticipated timelines for future financings under such shelf registration statement.  Such capacity will expire in May 2020.development and commercialization. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in obtaining such additional financing in the future on terms acceptable to the Company or at all.


Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

the costs of our Senhance System commercialization and development activities;

the costs and timing of seeking and obtaining FDA and other non-U.S. regulatory clearances and approvals for our products in development;

the costs associated with establishing a sales force and commercialization capabilities;

the costs associated with the expansion of our manufacturing capabilities;

our need to expand our research and development activities;

the costs of acquiring, licensing or investing in businesses, products and technologies;

the economic and other terms and timing of our existing licensing arrangement and any collaboration, licensing or other arrangements into which we may enter in the future;

our need and ability to hire additional management, scientific, medical and sales and marketing personnel;

the effect of competing technological and market developments;

our need to implement additional internal systems and infrastructure, including financial and reporting systems, quality systems and information technology systems; and

our ability to maintain, expand and defend the scope of our intellectual property portfolio.

Until we generate a sufficient amount of revenue to finance our cash requirements, which may never occur, we expect to finance future cash needs primarily through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or strategic collaborations. We do not know whether additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are not able to secure additional funding when needed, we may have to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of our research and development programs. To the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience significant dilution; and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that limit our operations. To the extent that we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our products or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.

Our strategic focus, on delivering tools and assistance to provide Performance-Guided Surgery opportunities, may not result in the growth of our business in the timeline we envision or at all.

On February 23, 2021, we announced a strategic focus on providing clinical intelligence to surgeons to provide Performance-Guided Surgery opportunities. We believe that the Senhance System, which digitizes the interface between the surgeon and the patient in laparoscopic surgery, can also be used, with our Augmented Intelligence offerings, to provide real-time clinical data throughout the entire surgical experience, assist in removing elements and factors that contribute to surgical variability and reduce complications. Our efforts to communicate and implement this strategy with hospitals, surgery centers and surgeons may take longer than we anticipate, may not be as successful as we contemplate, and may not result in a meaningful improvement in our business or financial condition.

In order to compete successfully within the surgical robotics and digital surgery industry, we need to continue to evolve our robotic surgery products and our digital surgery offerings.Failure to develop, obtain regulatory approval for and successfully commercialize such developments could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial position.

In order to compete successfully within the highly competitive surgical robotics industry, we need to continue to advance and innovate our robotic surgery products, including the innovations associated with the assets we acquired from MST in 2018.  Our focus currently is on harnessing the image technology acquired in the MST acquisition to advance the intelligence of our products through the ISU to provide meaningful real-time Augmented Intelligence to surgeons.  In addition, we entered into an agreement with NIVDIA and need to successfully harness the additional opportunities this agreement presents to us. We have developed and received CE Mark in Europe and FDA clearance in the U.S. for articulating instruments. These assets are also vital to our Performance-Guided Surgery strategy. If we fail to continue to develop such innovations, or fail to obtain regulatory approval or clearance for or to successfully commercialize such innovations, such failure could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial position.

We are also focused on commercial activities related to our ISU as a vital part of our Performance-Guided Surgery initiative. If we are not successful in commercializing the ISU, including a standalone ISU, our business could be materially adversely affected. Companies such as us rely on innovation and new product development to attract and retain customers. Such development efforts take time, are expensive, and there is no certainty that we will be successful in commercializing the ISU, developing the LUNA System, or receiving regulatory clearances and approvals, on a timely basis, if at all. If we are not successful in our development efforts, such failure will have a material adverse effect on our business and financial position.

We are focusing our development efforts on developing the LUNA System. If our development efforts are not successful, or if the LUNA System is not a commercial success, our business opportunities and financial position will be adversely affected.

The primary focus of our product development efforts are focused on our next generation robotic LUNA System. Development of a robotic system is difficult, time-consuming and expensive. We could suffer development setbacks, not meet our projected development schedule, become unable to finance the needed development efforts, fail to receive necessary regulatory clearance or approvals, or encounter difficulties in the manufacturing process. In addition, even if we do develop the LUNA System and receive the necessary regulatory clearances and approvals, we may be unable to successfully commercialize the LUNA System. If any of these risks occur, our business and financial position will be adversely affected.

The success of the LUNA System development efforts will be impacted by the results of the regulatory pathway.

We believe the regulatory pathway for the LUNA System will follow the 510(k) clearance pathway applicable to our other products. If the FDA determines that the LUNA System is “not substantially equivalent” to a previously cleared device, we might then need to fulfill the more rigorous PMA requirements, or request a risk-based classification determination for the device in accordance with the “de novo” process. Either alternative pathway would add significant time to our pursuit of FDA approval of the LUNA System, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial position.

We may not be successful in realizing benefits from our collaboration agreements.

We are collaborating with Google on further developing the Asensus Cloud as a key component of our LUNA System product offerings, and agreements with NVIDIA and Flex related to our ISU and LUNA System development efforts. If we are not successful in capitalizing on these collaborations, our reputation and our operations and financial condition may be harmed.

We cannot give any assurance that the Senhance System can be successfully commercialized.

We began our selling efforts for the Senhance System in the fourth quarter of 2015 in Europe, in the fourth quarter of 2017 in the United States, in the second quarter of 2018 in Asia and, through distributors in the Russian Federation in 2021.  We have had limited commercial success to date. We have determined to focus our energies on market development and increased usage of the Senhance Systems that have been purchased and placed, as well as on our Performance-Guided Surgery strategy. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully improve the commercialization of the Senhance System, for a number of reasons, including, without limitation, failure in our market development and sales efforts, the long sales cycle associated with the purchase of capital equipment, and the potential introduction by our competitors of more clinically effective or cost-effective alternatives.  In addition, we are now more focused on developing the LUNA System than on continued commercial success of the Senhance System.

We cannot assure you that we will be successful in continuing to grow utilization of the Senhance System and the ISU year over year.

While we believe Performance-Guided Surgery and our other tools available can assist the laparoscopic surgeon to perform successful surgeries, it is time-consuming to educate and train physicians and educate hospitals on the benefits of use of the Senhance System with the ISU. If we cannot continue to grow our procedure volume year over year, our business and financial condition will be adversely affected.

If we fail to attract and retain key management and professional personnel, we may be unable to successfully commercialize or develop our products.

We will need to effectively manage our operational, sales and marketing, development and other resources in order to successfully pursue our commercialization and research and development efforts for our existing and future products. Our success depends on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified personnel.  If we are not successful in retaining and recruiting highly qualified personnel, our business may be harmed as a result.

We use distributors to sell our Senhance Systems.

Purchase of a surgical robotic system such as the Senhance System represents a capital purchase by hospitals and other potential customers, which is a time-intensive process involving buy-in by surgeons and approval of the capital purchase by administration. We use distributors and sales agents in a number of geographic locations where we do not have sales personnel. We have procedures in place that require our distributors and sales agents to comply with applicable laws and regulations governing the sales of medical devices in the jurisdictions where they operate.  Failure to meet such requirements could subject us to financial penalties or the suspension or termination of our ability to sell products in such jurisdictions.  

The surgical robotics and digital surgery industries are increasingly competitive, which can negatively impact our commercial opportunities.

The medical device industry is highly competitive, and we face significant competition from companies that are researching and marketing products to address minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgery, including new entrants in the market. We are currently commercializing the Senhance System in the United States with FDA 510(k) clearance, in Europe which accepts a CE Mark, the Middle East, the Commonwealth of Independent States, and selected countries in Asia. We face significant competition in such markets. Many of our competitors, including Intuitive Surgical, have significantly greater financial, manufacturing, marketing and product development resources than we do. Some of the medical device companies that we do or expect to compete with include Medtronic plc, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Vicarious Surgical, Inc., Momentis Surgical, Distalmotion SA, CMR Surgical Ltd., Activ Surgical, Inc., Theator Surgical, CareSyntax Inc. and a number of MIS and robotic surgical device manufacturers and providers of solutions that are designed to reduce the need for or attractiveness of surgical intervention. In addition, many universities and private and public research institutions are or may become active in research involving surgical devices for MIS and robotic-assisted surgery.

We are also expanding the potential market for robotic surgical systems with our focus on laparoscopic surgery which may lead to additional competition with companies with substantially greater resources than ours. We believe that our ability to successfully compete will depend on, among other things: the efficacy, safety and reliability of our products; our ability to commercialize and market our cleared or approved products; the completion of our development efforts and receipt of regulatory clearance or approval for instruments and accessories to support the use of the Senhance System; the lower cost of ownership and use of our products in relation to alternative devices; the timing and scope of regulatory clearances or approvals, including any expansion of the indications for use for our products; whether our competitors substantially reduce the cost of ownership and use of an alternative device; our ability to protect and defend intellectual property rights related to our products; our ability to have our partners manufacture and sell commercial quantities of any cleared or approved products to the market; the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts; and acceptance of future products by physicians and other healthcare providers.

We have also seen a trend in the market for large medical device companies to acquire, invest in, or form alliances with smaller companies in order to diversify their product offerings and participate in the digital health space. We may find increased competition from other companies, many better capitalized than we are.

If our competitors market products that are more effective, safer, easier to use or less expensive than our products or future products, or that reach the market sooner than our products, we may not achieve commercial success. In addition, the medical device industry is characterized by rapid technological change. It may be difficult for us to stay abreast of the rapid changes in each technology. If we fail to stay at the forefront of technological change, we may be unable to compete effectively. Technological advances or products developed by our competitors may render our technologies or products obsolete or less competitive. We anticipate that the highly competitive surgical robotics environment can lead our competitors to attempt to slow or derail our commercial progress. We are using our best efforts to enter the commercial markets effectively while maintaining compliance with all regulatory and legal requirements. Responding to the actions of our competitors may distract the management team from its focus on our commercial operations and lead to increased costs of commercialization, which could have a negative impact on our financial position.

We also anticipate that the competitive environments will become more intense because of increased consolidation by companies in the healthcare industry looking to achieve cost reductions. Such consolidation may have an adverse effect on our business operations.

Use of our Senhance System requires training for surgeons, and inadequate training may lead to negative patient outcomes, which could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The successful use of our Senhance System depends in part on the training and skill of the surgeon performing the procedure and his or her comfort level with the use of a robotic device. We provide training and proctoring, as well as Senhance Connect, that allows us to provide real-time guidance as desired. We cannot be certain that all of the surgeons that use our Senhance System have received and completed sufficient training. If a surgeon uses our Senhance System incorrectly, or without adhering to or completing all relevant training, their patients could be negatively affected. Adverse safety outcomes that arise from improper or incorrect use of our Senhance System may limit adoption of our Senhance System, which could harm our sales, business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Issues relating to the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in our offerings could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We integrate artificial intelligence, AI, and machine learning in our products. Issues relating to the use of new and evolving technologies such as AI and machine learning may cause us to experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm, legal liability, and new or enhanced governmental or regulatory scrutiny, and we may incur additional costs to resolve such issues. As with many innovations, AI presents risks and challenges that could undermine or slow its adoption, and therefore harm our business. For example, perceived or actual technical, legal, compliance, privacy, security, ethical or other issues relating to the use of AI may cause public confidence in AI to be undermined, which could slow our customers’ adoption of our products and services that use AI. In addition, litigation or government regulation related to the use of AI may also adversely impact our and others’ abilities to develop and offer products that use AI, as well as increase the cost and complexity of doing so. Further, market demand and acceptance of AI technologies are uncertain, and we may be unsuccessful in our product development efforts.

Negative publicity, whether true or not, concerning us or our products could reduce market acceptance of our products.

There have been social media and other publications regarding us published from time to time since we started selling the Senhance System. Negative media and social media coverage, whether true or not, concerning our products or us could reduce market acceptance of our products and increase volatility in our stock price.

We are subject to risk as a result of our international manufacturing operations.

Because most of our products are manufactured at third-party facilities located in Europe, Israel and Singapore, our operations are subject to risk inherent in doing business internationally. Such risks include the adverse effects on operations from corruption, war, international terrorism, civil disturbances, political instability, government activities such as border taxes and renegotiation of treaties, deprivation of contract and property rights and currency valuation changes. Countries may adopt other measures, such as controls on imports or exports of goods, technology, or data, that could adversely impact the Company’s operations and supply chain and limit the Company’s ability to offer our products and services as designed. These measures could require us to take various actions, including changing suppliers and restructuring business relationships. Changing our operations in accordance with new or changed trade restrictions can be expensive, time-consuming, disruptive to our operations and distracting to management. Such restrictions can be announced with little or no advance notice, and we may not be able to effectively mitigate all adverse impacts from such measures. Any of these events could increase the cost of our products and services, or otherwise have a materially adverse impact on our or our suppliers’ businesses and results of operations. We have entered into agreements related to the manufacture of portions of our LUNA System in development. If we are unable to manufacture the LUNA System under the terms of these agreements, our business could be negatively impacted.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may adversely affect our financial results.

We conduct operations in several different countries, including the United States and throughout Europe, and portions of our revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros, and other currencies. Since our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, we must translate revenues, income and expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect during or at the end of each reporting period. We have not historically hedged our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations.  Accordingly, increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar against the Euro and other currencies could materially affect our net operating revenues, operating income and the value of balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies.

Our global operations expose us to additional risks and challenges associated with conducting business internationally.

The international nature of our business, particularly in Europe, Israel, Asia, CIS and the Russian Federation, may expose us to risks inherent in conducting foreign operations. These risks include: challenges associated with managing geographically diverse operations, which require an effective organizational structure and appropriate business processes, procedures and controls; the high cost of doing business in foreign jurisdictions, including compliance with international and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations; currency exchange and interest rate fluctuations and the resulting effect on our revenue and expenses, and the cost and risk of entering into hedging transactions, if we chose to do so in the future; changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic environment; trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements or other restrictive actions by U.S. or non-U.S. governments; potentially adverse tax consequences; complexities and difficulties in obtaining protection and enforcing our intellectual property; compliance with additional regulations and government authorities in a highly regulated business; difficulties associated with staffing and managing foreign operations, including differing labor relations; and general economic and political conditions outside of the U.S.

Significant disruptions of our information technology systems or data security incidents could harm our reputation, cause us to modify our business practices, and otherwise adversely affect our business and subject us to liability.

We are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store, process, and transmit sensitive corporate, personal, and other information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, customer data including PII, and other confidential information. Our obligations under applicable laws, regulations, contracts, industry standards, self-certifications, and other documentation may include maintaining the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of personal information in our possession or control, maintaining reasonable and appropriate security safeguards as part of an information security program. These obligations create potential legal liability to regulators, our business partners, our customers, and other relevant stakeholders, and also impact the attractiveness of our products and services to existing and potential customers.

Our systems are subject to cyber-attacks, viruses, worms, malicious software programs, outages, equipment malfunction or constraints, software deficiencies, human error, hacking and other malicious intrusions, which may materially disrupt our business and compromise our data. Cyber-attacks are expected to accelerate on a global basis in both frequency and magnitude as threat actors are becoming increasingly sophisticated in using techniques and tools (including artificial intelligence) that circumvent controls, evade detection and even remove forensic evidence of the infiltration. There can be no assurance that the systems we have designed to prevent or limit the effects of cyber incidents or attacks will be sufficient to prevent or detect material consequences arising from such incidents or attacks, or avoid a material adverse impact on our systems after such incidents or attacks do occur. Even if we successfully defend our own digital technologies, we also rely on providers of third-party products, services, and networks, with whom we may share data and services, and who may be unable to effectively defend their digital technologies and services against attack.

Unauthorized access to or modification of, or actions disabling our ability to obtain authorized access to, our customers’ data, other external data, personal data, or our own data, as a result of a cyber incident, attack or exploitation of a security vulnerability, or loss of control of our clients’ operations could result in significant damage to our reputation or disruption of the services we provide to our customers or of our customers’ businesses. In addition, allegations, reports, or concerns regarding vulnerabilities affecting our digital products or services could damage our reputation. We may not be able to anticipate and prevent such disruptions or intrusions, and we may not be able to mitigate them when and if they occur. Any failure, breach or unauthorized access to our or third-party systems could result in the loss of confidential, sensitive or proprietary information, interruptions in service or production or otherwise encumber our ability to conduct business operations and could result in potential reductions in revenue and profits, damage to its reputation or liability. Furthermore, we may incur significant costs in responding to any such disruption or intrusion and remedying our systems. In such event we may also be subject to litigation and other potential liability, which could materially impact our business and financial condition. Further, as regulatory focus on privacy and data security issues continues to increase and worldwide laws and regulations concerning the protection of information become more complex, the potential risks and costs of compliance to the company’s business will intensify.

Although we have implemented remote working protocols for some employees and offer work-issued devices to employees, the actions of our employees while working remotely may have a greater effect on the security of our systems and the data we process, including by increasing the risk of compromise to our systems, intellectual property, or data arising from employees’ combined personal and private use of devices, accessing our systems or data using wireless networks that we do not control, or the ability to transmit or store company-controlled data outside of our secured network.

We maintain insurance policies to cover certain losses relating to our information technology systems. However, there may be exceptions to our insurance coverage such that our insurance policies may not cover some or all aspects of a security incident. Even where an incident is covered by our insurance, the insurance limits may not cover the costs of complete remediation and redress that we may be faced with in the wake of a security incident. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceeds our available insurance coverage, or results in changes to our insurance policies (including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements), could have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, we cannot be sure that our existing insurance coverage and coverage for errors and omissions will continue to be available on acceptable terms or that our insurers will not deny coverage as to any future claim.

In addition, any actual or perceived failure by us, our vendors, or our business partners to comply with our privacy, confidentiality, or data security-related legal or other obligations to customers or other third parties, or any further security incidents or other unauthorized access events that result in the unauthorized access, release, or transfer of sensitive information (which could include personal data), may result in governmental investigations, enforcement actions, regulatory fines, litigation, or public statements against us by advocacy groups or others, and could cause third parties, including current and potential partners, to lose trust in us (including existing or potential customers’ perceiving our products or services as less desirable), or we could be subject to claims by third parties that we have breached our privacy- or confidentiality-related obligations, which could materially and adversely affect our business and prospects. There can be no assurance that the limitations of liability in our contracts would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect us from liabilities or damages.

The conflict in Israel and Gaza is likely to have a material adverse impact on us and our employees.

We have an office and valued employees who live and work in Israel. The current conflict in Israel could have a material adverse impact on our business and operations. Our digital surgery software development efforts are centered in our Israeli subsidiary, and the conflict could cause unexpected delays in our development efforts. Some of our employees have been called to active military duty. In addition, a third-party manufacturer of our ISU located in Israel could be negatively impacted affecting our ability to meet our supply obligations, and export of such ISUs, and other supply management activities and materials due to transport restrictions. If the conflict is prolonged or significantly worsens, these factors could have a material adverse impact on our business operations and employees.

We face risks arising from sole suppliers of components and our ability to meet delivery schedules for sales of our products.

The Senhance System is manufactured for us under contract by a third-party manufacturer. We or our manufacturer acquire raw materials and components of the Senhance System from vendors, some of which are sole suppliers. Although we believe that we have the manufacturing capacity and inventory reserves to meet our anticipated Senhance System sales for the foreseeable future, we are currently taking steps to develop redundant manufacturing and supply alternatives. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in developing these redundant supply and manufacturing capabilities. If we are not successful, our business operations could suffer.

Our products require precise, high-quality manufacturing. We and our contract manufacturers will be subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspection by the FDA and non-U.S. regulatory authorities to ensure strict compliance with the quality systems regulations, current “good manufacturing practices” and other applicable government regulations and corresponding standards. If we or our contract manufacturers fail to achieve and maintain high manufacturing standards in compliance with QSR, we may experience manufacturing errors resulting in patient injury or death, product recalls or withdrawals, delays or interruptions of production or failures in product testing or delivery, delay or prevention of filing or approval of marketing applications for our products, cost overruns or other problems that could seriously harm our business.

The inflationary environment could materially adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Changes in economic conditions and supply chain constraints and steps taken by governments and central banks could lead to higher inflation than previously experienced or expected, which could, in turn, lead to an increase in costs. An inflationary environment could have a negative impact on our expenses, increase our labor costs and reduce our available cash flow.

Because our design, development and manufacturing capabilities are limited, we rely on third parties to design, develop, manufacture or supply some of our products. An inability to find additional or alternate sources for these services and products could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We have used third-party design and development sources to assist in the design and development of our medical device products. In the future, we may choose to use additional third-party sources for the design and development of our products. If these design and development partners are unable to provide their services in the timeframe or to the performance level that we require, we may not be able to establish a contract and obtain a sufficient alternative supply from another supplier on a timely basis and in the manner that we require.

Risks Related to Our Status as a Public Company

Our stock price has been volatile and may experience additional volatility and fluctuation in the future.

The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, volatile, and the market price of our common stock could decrease and could cause you to lose some or all of your investment in our common stock.  During the two-year period ended December 31, 2023, the market price of our common stock fluctuated from a high of $1.19 per share to a low of $0.20 per share. The market price of our common stock may continue to fluctuate significantly. In addition, a prolonged low stock price may subject us to delisting or require us to take action, such as a reverse stock split, to maintain our listing.

We are currently a smaller reporting company, which may limit our ability to raise sufficient capital to advance our LUNA System and Performance-Guided Surgery development efforts.

Our stock price was below $1.00 per share during all of 2023. If our stock price continues to remain under $1.00 per share for an extended period, that makes fundraising more difficult and impacts our ability to attract long-term investors.

Our stockholders have experienced dilution of their percentage ownership of our stock and may experience additional dilution in the future.

We have raised significant capital through the issuance of our common stock and warrants and anticipate that we willmay need to raise substantial additional capital in order to continue our operations and achieve our business objectives. We have an effective shelf registration statement under which we have the current ability to raise up to $100 million through the issuance of equity or debt securities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell shares or other securities in any offering at a price per share that is equal to or greater than the price per share paid by investors in previous offerings, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing stockholders. The price per share at which we sell additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share in previous offerings. The future issuance of the Company’s equity securities will further dilute the ownership of our outstanding common stock.  The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, highly volatile, and such volatility could cause the market price of our common stock to decrease and could cause youstockholders to lose some or all of yourtheir investment in our common stock.

Sales by stockholders

Risks Related to Protection of our shares of common stock, the issuance of new shares of common stock by us or the perception that these sales may occur in the future could materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

As of December 31, 2017, our directors, executive officers, principal stockholders and affiliated entities beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately 25% of our outstanding voting securities. As a result, if some or all of them acted together, they would have the ability to exert substantial influence over the election of our board of directors and the outcome of issues requiring approval by our stockholders. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company that may be favored by other stockholders. This could prevent transactions in which stockholders might otherwise recover a premium for their shares over current market prices.


The exercise of our outstanding options and warrants will dilute stockholders and could decrease our stock price.

The existence of our outstanding options and warrants, including the outstanding Series B Warrants, may adversely affect our stock price due to sales of a large number of shares or the perception that such sales could occur. These factors also could make it more difficult to raise funds through future offerings of common stock or warrants, and could adversely impact the terms under which we could obtain additional equity capital. Exercise of outstanding options and warrants, or any future issuance of additional shares of common stock or other equity securities, including but not limited to options, warrants or other derivative securities convertible into our common stock, may result in significant dilution to our stockholders and may decrease our stock price.

If we default on our existing indebtedness, such default would affect our financial condition.

We are party with Innovatus Life Sciences Lending Fund I, LP, or the Lender, and jointly and severally liable with certain of our U.S. subsidiaries for $14.0 million of outstanding debt under term loans issued under our Loan and Security Agreement, or the Innovatus Loan Agreement. The maturity date of the outstanding term loan is May 10, 2021.  If we were to become unable to pay, when due, the principal of, interest on, or other amounts due in respect of, our indebtedness, our financial condition would be adversely affected.  Further, under the Innovatus Loan Agreement, we are subject to certain restrictive covenants that, among other things, subject to exceptions, restrict the Company’s ability to do the following things: declare dividends or redeem or repurchase equity interests; incur additional liens; make loans and investments; incur additional indebtedness; engage in mergers, acquisitions, and asset sales; transact with affiliates; undergo a change in control; add or change business locations; and engage in businesses that are not related to its existing business. If we breach any of these restrictive covenants or are unable to pay our indebtedness under the Innovatus Loan Agreement when due, this could result in a default under the Innovatus Loan Agreement. In such event, the Lender may elect (after the expiration of any applicable notice or grace periods) to declare all outstanding borrowings, together with accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts payable under the Innovatus Loan Agreement, to be immediately due and payable. Any such occurrence would have an adverse impact on our financial condition. The Company’s obligations under the Innovatus Loan Agreement are secured by a security interest in all of the assets of the Company and its current and future domestic and material foreign subsidiaries, including a security interest in the intellectual property.  

We issued 24,900,000 Series A Warrants and 24,900,000 Series B Warrants in May 2017; the outstanding warrants must be revalued each reporting period.  In addition, we owe contingent consideration to Sofar under the Purchase Agreement that is also revalued each reporting period.  Such assessments involve the use of estimates that could later be found to differ materially from actual results.

On April 28, 2017, we sold 24.9 million units, each consisting of one share of common stock, a Series A warrant to purchase one share of common stock, and a Series B warrant to purchase 0.75 shares of common stock, at a public offering price of $1.00 per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of $24.9 million in an underwritten firm commitment public offering.  As of December 31, 2017, all Series A warrants were exercised. At December 31, 2017, Series B Warrants to acquire 9.8 million shares of common stock were outstanding. The outstanding Series B Warrants contain provisions, often referred to as “down-round protection” that may lead to adjustment of the exercise price and number of underlying warrant shares with respect to future issuances by the Company of its securities, including its common stock or convertible securities or debt securities.  In addition, the third tranche of the contingent consideration to be paid to Sofar under the Purchase Agreement remains outstanding, to be paid if the designated milestone is met.  

The Series B Warrants and the contingent consideration are each recorded as a liability on our financial statements, and we are required to revalue each of the outstanding Series B Warrants and the contingent consideration at each reporting period.  Such revaluations necessarily involve the use of estimates, assumptions, probabilities and application of complex accounting principles.  Actual value at the time the Series B Warrants are exercised or the contingent consideration paid could vary significantly from the value assigned to such liabilities on a quarterly basis. We cannot assure you that the revaluation of the Series B Warrants and contingent consideration will equal the value in the future, and know that the actual value could be significantly different, which could have a material adverse effect on us.  Intellectual Property

 

We sold our SurgiBot System assets in 2017, and we may not obtain the royalty income we anticipate from such sale.

In December 2017, we transferred ownership of the SurgiBot System assets to GBIL. The agreements provide rights to the purchaser to manufacture, or have manufactured, the SurgiBot System in China, and provides exclusive distribution rights to the Chinese market.  The agreement provides us with minimum royalties of $14 million over a future five-year period.  If the buyer is not successful in gaining Chinese regulatory approval or marketing the SurgiBot System, we will only receive such minimum royalties, decreasing the return on the funds expended in the development of the SurgiBot System.  


Our commercial success depends significantly on our ability to operate without infringing the patents and other proprietary rights of third parties.

Other entities may have or obtain patents or proprietary rights that could limit our ability to manufacture, use, sell, offer for sale or import products or impair our competitive position. In addition, to the extent thatIf a third party develops new technology that coversthird-party has proprietary rights covering our products, we may be required to obtainrequire licenses, to that technology, which licenses may not be available or may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, ifor at all. If licenses are not available to us on acceptable terms, we will not be able to market the affected products or conduct the desired activities, unless we challenge the validity, enforceability or infringement of the third-party patent or circumvent the third-party patent, which would be costly and would require significant time and attention of our management. Third parties may have or obtain valid and enforceable patents or proprietary rights that could block us from developing products using our technology. Our failure to obtain a license to any technology that we require may materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we become involved in patent litigation or other proceedings related to a determination ofproprietary rights, we could incur substantial costs and expenses, substantial liability for damages or be required to stop our product development and commercialization efforts, any of which could materially adversely affect our liquidity, business prospects and results of operations.

Third parties may sue us for infringing their patent rights.patents. Likewise, we may need to resort to litigation to enforce a patent issued or licensed to usour patents or to determine the scope and validity of proprietary rightspatents of others. In addition, a third partythird-party may claim that we have improperly obtained or used its confidential or proprietary information. Furthermore, in connection with our third-party license agreements, we generally have agreed to indemnify the licensor for costs incurred in connection with litigation relating to intellectual property rights. The cost to us of any litigation or other proceeding relating to intellectual property rights, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial, and the litigation would divert our management’s efforts. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we canus because they have substantially greater resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could limit our ability to continue our operations.

If any parties successfully claim that our creation or use of proprietary technologies infringes uponactivities infringe their intellectual property rights, we might be forced to pay damages, potentially including treble damages, if we are found to have willfully infringed on such parties’ patent rights.infringed. In addition to any damages we might have to pay, a court could require us to stop the infringing activity or obtain a license. Any license required under any patent may not be made available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, such licenses are likely to be non-exclusive and, therefore, our competitors may have access to the same technology licensed to us. If we fail to obtain a required license and are unable to design around a patent, we may be unable to effectively market some of our technology and products, which could limit our ability to generate revenues or achieve profitability and possibly prevent us from generating revenue sufficient to sustain our operations.

For our Senhance System, we rely on our license from the European Union, and any loss of our rights under such license agreement, or failure to properly prosecute, maintain or enforce the patent applications underlying such license agreement, could materially adversely affect our business prospects for the Senhance System.

Some of the patents and patent applications in our patent portfolio related to the Senhance System are licensed to TransEnterixAsensus Surgical Italia S.r.l. under a license agreement with the European Union. Presently, weWe rely on such licensed technology for our Senhance System products andSystem. We may license additional technology from the European Union or other third parties in the future. The EU license agreement gives us rights for the commercial exploitation of the licensed patents, patent applications and know-how, subject to certain provisions of the license agreement. Failure to comply with these provisions could result in the loss of our rights under the EU license agreement. Our inability to rely on these patents and patent applications which are the basis of certain aspects of our Senhance System technology would have an adverse effect on our business.

Further, our success will depend in part on the ability of us, the European UnionEU and other third-party licensors to obtain, maintain and enforce patent protection for ourthe licensed intellectual propertypatents and, in particular, those patents to which we have securedhold exclusive rights. We, the European UnionEU or other third-party licensors may not successfully prosecute the patent applications which are licensed to us, may fail to maintain thesethe patents, and may determine not to pursue litigation against other companies that are infringing thesethe patents, or may pursue such litigation less aggressively than necessary to obtain an acceptable outcome from any such litigation. Without protection for the intellectual property we have licensed, other companies might be able to offer substantially identical products for sale, which could materially adversely affect our competitive business position, business prospects and results of operations.

If we or our licensors are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how, the value of our technology and products could be adversely affected.

In addition to patent protection, we also rely on other proprietary rights, including protection of trade secrets, know-how and confidential and proprietary information. To maintain the confidentiality of trade secrets and proprietary information, we will seek to


enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and collaborators upon the commencement of their relationships with us. These agreements generally require that all confidential information developed by the individual or made known to the individual by us during the course of the individual’s relationship with us be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties.confidential. Our agreements with employees also generally provide and will generally provide that any inventions conceived by the individual in the course of rendering services to us shall be our exclusive property. However, we may not obtain these agreements in all circumstances, and individuals with whom we have these agreements may not comply with their terms. In the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets or proprietary information, these agreements, even if obtained, may not provide meaningful protection, particularly for our trade secrets or other confidential information. To the extent thatprotection. If our employees, consultants or contractors use technology or know-how owned by third parties in their work for us, disputes may arise between us and those third parties as to the rights in related inventions. Adequate remedies may not exist in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information. The disclosure of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position and may materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.operations

If we are unable to obtain and enforce patent protection for our products, our business could be materially harmed.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect proprietary methods and technologies that we develop or license under the patent and other intellectual property laws of the United States and other countries, so that we can prevent others from unlawfully using our inventions and proprietary information. However, we may not hold proprietary rights to some patents required for us to commercialize our proposed products. Because certain U.S. patent applications are confidential until patents issue, such as applications filed prior to November 29, 2000, or applications filed after such date which will not be filed in foreign countries, thirdThird parties may have filed patent applications for technology covered by our pending patent applications without our being aware of those applications, and our patent applications may not have priority over those applications. For this and other reasons, we or our third-party collaborators may be unable to secure desired patent rights, thereby losing desired exclusivity. If licenses are not available to us on acceptable terms, we will not be able to market the affected products or conduct the desired activities, unless we challenge the validity, enforceability or infringement of the third-party patent or otherwise circumvent the third-party patent.

Our strategy depends on our ability to promptly identify and seek patent protection for our discoveries. In addition, we may rely on third-party collaborators to file patent applications relating to proprietary technology thatfor inventions we develop jointly during certain collaborations. The process of obtaining patent protectionpatents is expensive and time-consuming. If our present or future collaborators fail to file and prosecute all necessary and desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost and in a timely manner, our business will be adversely affected. Despite our efforts and the efforts of our collaborators to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may be able to develop and use information that we regard as proprietary.

The issuance of a patent provides a presumption, but does not guarantee that it is valid. Any patents we have obtained, or obtain in the future, may be challenged or potentially circumvented. Moreover, the United StatesUS Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO, may commence interference proceedings involving our patents or patent applications. Any such challenge to our patents or patent applications would be costly, would require significant time and attention of our management and could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, future court decisions may introduce uncertainty in the enforceability or scope of any patent, including those owned by medical device companies.patent.

Our pending patent applications may not result in issued patents. TheA business’s patent position, of medical device companies, including ours, is generally uncertain and involves complex legal and factual considerations. The standards that the USPTO and its foreign counterparts use to grant patents are not always applied predictably or uniformly and can change. There is also no uniform, worldwide policy regarding the subject matter and scope of claims granted or allowable in medical device patents. Accordingly, we do not know the degree of future protection for our proprietary rights or the breadth of claims that will be allowed in any patents issued to us or to others. The legal systems of certain countries do not favor the aggressive enforcement of patents, and the laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Therefore, the enforceability or scope of our owned or licensed patents in the United StatesUS or in foreign countries cannot be predicted with certainty, and, as a result, anysuch patents that we own or license may not provide sufficient protection against competitors. We may not be able to obtain or maintain patent protection for our pending patent applications, those we may file in the future, or those we may license from third parties.

We cannot assure you that any patents that will issue, that may issue or that may be licensed to us will be enforceable or valid or will not expire prior to the commercialization of our products, thus allowing others to more effectively compete with us. Therefore, any patents that we own or license may not adequately protect our future products.


Even if

Certain software being developed for the LUNA System and the ISU may include third-party open source software. Any failure to comply with the terms of one or more open source software licenses could adversely affect our business, subject us to litigation, or create potential liability.

Certain software being developed for the LUNA System and for the ISU may include third-party open source software and we obtain regulatoryexpect to continue to incorporate open source software in the future. The use of open source software involves a number of risks, many of which cannot be eliminated and could negatively affect our business. For example, we cannot ensure that we have effectively monitored our use of open source software or that we are in compliance with the terms of the applicable open source licenses or our current policies and procedures. There have been claims against companies that use open source software asserting that the use of such open source software infringes the claimants’ intellectual property rights. As a result, we could be subject to suits by third parties claiming infringement on such third parties’ intellectual property rights. Litigation could be costly for us to defend, have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, or require us to devote additional research and development resources to modify our computational drug discovery platform.

Risks Related to Regulation of our Business

For our existing product clearances, approvals, or approvalscertifications and for our future products, the terms thereof and ongoing regulation of our products may limit how we manufacture and market our products, which could materially impair our ability to generate anticipated revenues. If we or our suppliers fail to comply with ongoing FDA or other foreign regulatory authority requirements, or if we experience unanticipated problems with our products, these products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market.

Once regulatory clearance, approval or approvalcertification has been granted,obtained, the cleared, approved or approvedcertified product and its manufacturer are subject to continual review.ongoing regulatory requirements. Any cleared, approved or approvedcertified product may be promoted only for its indicatedintended uses. In addition, if the FDA, or other non-U.S. regulatory authorities, or our Notified Body clear, approve, or approvecertify any of our products, the labeling, packaging, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising and promotion for the product will be subject to extensive regulatory requirements.oversight. We and any outsourced manufacturers of our products are also required to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation,QSR, or similar requirements of non-U.S. regulatory authorities which includes requirements relating to quality control and quality assurance, as well as the corresponding maintenance of records and documentation as well as other quality system requirements and regulations from non-U.S. regulatory authorities. Further, regulatory agencies must approve our manufacturing facilities for Class III devices before they can be used to manufacture our products, and all manufacturing facilities are subject to ongoingroutine regulatory inspection.

Regulatory authorities, such as the FDA in the U.S., and notified bodies enforce regulatory requirements through periodic inspections, among other activities. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements of the FDA, either before or after clearance or approval, or other non-U.S. regulatory authorities, or if previously unknown problems with our products, manufacturers or manufacturing processes are discovered, we could be subject to administrative or judicially imposed sanctions, including:

restrictions on theour products, manufacturers or manufacturing process;

adverse inspectional observations (Form 483) warning letters, non-warning, Warning Letters, Untitled Letters, letters incorporating inspectional observations;

observations, or consent decrees; civil or criminal penalties or fines;

injunctions;

product seizures, detentions or import bans;

voluntary or mandatory product recalls and publicity requirements;

suspension limitation or withdrawal of regulatory clearances, approvals, or approvals;

certifications; total or partial suspension of production;

imposition of restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements;

refusal to clear or approve pending applications or premarket notifications; and

import and export restrictions.

Any of these sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore,

Our future success depends on our key component suppliers may not currentlyability to develop, receive regulatory clearance, approval for, and introduce new products that will be accepted by the market in a timely manner. There is no guarantee that the FDA will grant 510(k) clearance, de-novo authorization or may not continue PMA approval, or that a Notified Body will issue the relevant CE Certificates of Conformity, of/to be in compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements, which could result in our failure to produce ourfuture products on a timely basis, and in the required quantities, if at all.all, and failure to obtain necessary clearances, approvals or certifications for our future products would adversely affect our ability to grow our business.

In addition, theWhen a 510(k) notice, de novo request, or PMA is submitted for a new product or for a change to an existing product, there is no guarantee that it will receive FDA and other non-U.S. regulatory authorities may change their policies and additional regulations may be enacted that could prevent or delay regulatoryauthorization. Failure to receive clearance or approval offor our products. We cannot predict the likelihood, naturenew products or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are not ableindications for use would have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain regulatory compliance, we would likely not be permitted to marketexpand our future products and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.


The regulatory approval and clearance processes are expensive, time-consuming and uncertain and may prevent us from obtaining approvals or clearances, as the case may be, for the commercialization of some or all of our products.

Regulatory approval of a PMA, PMA supplement or clearance pursuant to a 510(k) premarket notification is not guaranteed, and the approval or clearance process, as the case may be, is expensive, uncertain and may, especially in the case of the PMA application, take several years. The FDA also has substantial discretion in the medical device clearance process or approval process. Despite the time and expense exerted, failure can occur at any stage, and we could encounter problems that cause us to repeat or perform additional development, standardized testing, pre-clinical studies and clinical trials. The number of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials that will be required for FDA clearance or approval varies depending on the medical device candidate, the disease or condition that the medical device candidate is designed to address, and the regulations applicable to any particular medical device candidate. The FDA or other non-U.S. regulatory authorities can delay, limit or deny clearance or approval of a medical device candidate for many reasons, including:

a medical device candidate may not be deemed safe or effective, in the case of a PMA application;

a medical device candidate may not be deemed to be substantially equivalent to a device lawfully marketed either as a grandfathered device or one that was cleared through the 510(k) premarket notification process;

a medical device candidate may not be deemed to be in conformance with applicable standards and regulations;

FDA or other regulatory officials may not find the data from pre-clinical studies and clinical trials sufficient;

the FDA might not approve our processes or facilities or those of any of our third-party manufacturers for a Class III PMA device;

other non-U.S. regulatory authorities may not approve our processes or facilities or those of any of our third-party manufacturers, thereby restricting export; or

the FDA or other non-U.S. regulatory authorities may change clearance or approval policies or adopt new regulations.

The laws governing the regulatory approval or clearance pathways in jurisdictions outside of the United States are complex.  We need to ensure that our activities, and the activities of our distributors and agents, comply with such laws.business. If we do not comply withreceive clearance for any device enhancements, modifications or expanded indication, we will not be able to market the modified device in the U.S. or other foreign countries until such laws,clearance, approval, authorization or certification is obtained.

Our products are subject to international regulatory processes and approval or certification requirements. If we maydo not obtain and maintain the necessary international regulatory approvals or certifications, we will not be able to sell our products including the Senhance System, in all jurisdictions we have targeted, which could have an adverse effect on our business operations and financial condition.  other countries.

OnceTo be able to sell our products are clearedin other countries, we or approved, modifications to our products may require new 510(k) clearances, premarketdistributor must obtain regulatory approvals or new or amended CE Certificates of Conformity,certifications and may require us to cease marketing or recall the modified products until clearances, approvals or the relevant CE Certificates of Conformity are obtained.

Any modification to a 510(k)-cleared device that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, design, or manufacture, requires a new 510(k) clearance or, possibly, a PMA. The FDA requires every manufacturer to make this determination in the first instance, but the FDA may review such determinations. The FDA may not agree with our decisions regarding whether new clearances or approvals are necessary. If the FDA disagrees with our determinations for any future changes, or prior changes to previously marketed products, as the case may be, we may be required to cease marketing or to recall the modified products until we obtain clearance or approval, and we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties.

Furthermore, the FDA’s ongoing review of the 510(k) program may make it more difficult for us to make modifications to our products, either by imposing more strict requirements on when a new 510(k) for a modification to a previously cleared product must be submitted, or applying more onerous review criteria to such submissions. In October 2017, the FDA issued guidance documents addressing when to submit a new 510(k) due to modifications to 510(k) cleared products and the criteria for evaluating substantial equivalence. The interpretation of the guidance document by the FDA staff could lead to instances where the FDA disagrees with the Company’s decision regarding a change, and could result in warning letters and other enforcement actions.

Even after clearance or approval for our products is obtained, we are subject to extensive post-market regulation by the FDA. Our failure to meet strict regulatory requirements could require us to pay fines, incur other costs or even close our facilities.

Even after we have obtained the proper regulatory clearance or approval to market a product, the FDA has the power to require us to conduct post-market studies. These studies can be very expensive and time-consuming to conduct. Failure to complete such studies in a timely manner could result in the revocation of clearance or approval and the recall or withdrawal of the product, which could prevent us from generating sales from that product in the United States. The FDA has broad enforcement powers, and any regulatory enforcement actions or inquiries, or other increased scrutiny on us, could dissuade some surgeons from using our products and adversely affect our reputation and the perceived safety and efficacy of our products.


We are also required to comply with the FDA’s QSR,regulations of those countries, which coversmay differ substantially from those of the methods used in,U.S. These regulations, including the requirements for approvals or certifications and the facilitiestime required for regulatory review, vary from country to country. Obtaining and controls used for,maintaining foreign regulatory approvals or certifications is complex, and timing to obtain clearances or certifications in those countries varies; therefore, we cannot be certain that we will receive regulatory approvals or certifications in any other country in which we plan to market our products or obtain such approvals or certifications on a favorable schedule. The time required to obtain marketing authorization in other countries might differ from that required to obtain FDA authorization. If we or our distributor fail to obtain or maintain regulatory approval or certification in any other country in which we plan to market our products, our ability to generate revenue will be harmed. Regulatory authorization of a product in one country does not ensure regulatory authorization in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining marketing authorization in one country may negatively impact the design, manufacture, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, sterilization, storage, shipping, installationregulatory process in others.

One of the most significant moving targets related to the regulatory landscape is in the EU; more specifically, the medical devices regulation has recently evolved. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices (the MDR) became applicable in the European Union on May 26, 2021. The MDR, which replaced the MDD in May 2021 (subject to certain transitional provisions) imposes significant additional premarket and servicingpost-market certification requirements on medical devices marketed in the EU. European Economic Area (EEA) Member State legislation may also restrict or impose limitations on our ability to advertise our products directly to the general public. In addition, voluntary EU and national codes of conduct provide guidelines on the advertising and promotion of our marketed products. The FDA enforcesproducts to the QSR through periodic announcedgeneral public and unannounced inspections of manufacturing facilities. In addition, in the future, regulatory authorities and/or customers may require specific packaging of sterile products, which could increaseimpose limitations on our costs and the price of our products. Later discovery of previously unknown problemspromotional activities with our products, including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, manufacturing problems, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements such as QSR, may result in changes to labeling, restrictions on such products or manufacturing processes, withdrawal of the products from the market, voluntary or mandatory recalls, a requirement to repair, replace or refund the cost of any medical device we manufacture or distribute, fines, suspension of regulatory approvals, product seizures, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties which would adversely affecthealthcare providers harming our business, operating results and prospects.

financial condition. If one ofwe are unable to obtain timely certifications for our products under the MDR, or experience difficulty scheduling with a malfunction of one ofNotified Body, our business prospects in the EU could be materially adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Our products causesmay cause or contributescontribute to a deathadverse events or a serious injury, we will be subject to medical device reporting regulations, whichfailures or malfunctions that we are required to report to the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities and can result in voluntary corrective actions or agency enforcement actions.

Under the FDA’s medical device reporting, or MDR, regulations, we are required to report to the FDA any incident in which our product may have caused or contributed to a death, serious health threat or serious injury or in which our product malfunctioned and, if the malfunction were to recur, would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury. Repeated adverse events or product malfunctions may result in a voluntary or involuntary product recall, which could divert managerial and financial resources, impair our ability to manufacture our products in a cost-effective and timely manner, and have an adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations and financial condition. We are also required to follow detailed recordkeeping requirements for all firm-initiated medical device corrections and removals, and to report such corrective and removal actions to the FDA if they are carried out in response to a risk to health and have not otherwise been reported under the MDR regulations.

All manufacturers bringing medical devices to market in the European Economic Area, or EEA are legally bound to report any incident that directly or indirectly led, might have led or might have ledlead to the death or serious deterioration in the state of health of a patient, user or other person, or to a serious public health threat, and which the manufacturer’s device is suspected to have caused,be a contributory cause, to the competent authority in whose jurisdiction the incident occurred. In such case, the manufacturer must file an initial report with the relevant competent authority, which would be followed by further evaluation or investigation of the incident and a final report indicating whether further action is required. Any adverse event involving our products could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer notifications, or agency action, such as inspection or enforcement action. Adverse events involving our products have been reported to us in the past, and we cannot guarantee that they will not occur in the future. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, will require the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business and may harm our reputation and financial results.

A recall of our products, either voluntarily or at the direction of the FDA or another governmental authority, or the discovery of serious safety issues with our products, could have a significant adverse impact on us.

The FDA and similar foreign governmental authorities such as the competent authorities of the EEA countries have the authority to require the recall of commercialized products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture or in the event that a product poses an unacceptable risk to health. Manufacturers may, under their own initiative, recall a product if any material deficiency in a device is found. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us or one of our distributors could occur as a result of an unacceptable risk to health, component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues.

Any future recalls of any of our products would divert managerial and financial resources and could have an adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations and financial condition, which could impair our ability to produce our products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet our customers’ demands. We may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits.

Our employees, consultants, third-party vendors and collaborators may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements.

We are exposed to the risk of employee, consultant, third-party vendor or collaborator fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by our employees, consultants, third-party vendors or collaborators could include, among other things, intentional failures to comply with FDA, EU or other regulations, provide accurate information to the FDA or other regulators, comply with manufacturing standards, comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to us. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and result in the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions against us.

Clinical trials may be necessary to support our future product submissions to the FDA or Notified Bodies and such trials are lengthy, regulatory nuanced, interactive and involve working with third parties. These and other factors may affect our ability to complete clinical trials and may lead to delays or failures that would affect our business and financial prospects.

Initiating and completing clinical trials necessary to support any future products, including those that may require PMAs, and additional safety and efficacy data beyond that typically required for a 510(k) clearance, for our possible future product candidates, will be time-consuming and expensive and the outcome uncertain. Moreover, the results of early clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results, and any product we advance into clinical trials may not have favorable results in later clinical trials. The results of preclinical studies and clinical trials of our products and product candidates conducted to date and ongoing or future studies and trials of our current, planned or future products may not be predictive of the results of later clinical trials, and interim results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. Our interpretation of data and results from our clinical trials do not ensure that we will achieve similar results in future clinical trials. In addition, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to various interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their products performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and earlier clinical trials have nonetheless failed to replicate results in later clinical trials. Products in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy despite having progressed through nonclinical studies and earlier clinical trials. Failure can occur at any stage of clinical testing. Our clinical trials may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical and non-clinical testing in addition to those we have planned.

U.S. legislative, FDA regulatory reforms or FDAglobal regulatory reforms may make it more difficult and costly for us to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates and to manufacture, market and distribute our products after approval is obtained.

Legislative changes could significantly alter the statutory provisions governing the regulatory approval, manufacture and marketing of regulated products. In addition, FDA regulations and guidance could be revised or reinterpreted by the FDA in ways that could significantly affect our business and our products. AnyFor example, the FDA just finalized a rule to replace the QSR by adopting ISO 13485. Companies are required to come into compliance with this new rule by February 2026. This, and any new regulations or revisions, or reinterpretations of existing regulations, may impose additional costs or lengthen review times of future products. It is impossible to predict whether legislative changes will be enacted or FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, and what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.


Even if we receive We anticipate that future regulatory clearancerequirements may focus on artificial intelligence or approval to marketclinical decision support products, such as our ISU, which may subject our products to additional regulations.

Disruptions at the marketFDA and other government agencies or Notified Bodies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire, retain, or deploy key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent products from being developed, cleared, certified, approved, or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which may not be receptive toadversely affect our products, which could undermine our financial viability.business.

Even if our products obtain regulatory clearance or approval, resulting products may not gain market acceptance amongThe delivery of healthcare by hospitals, health systems, and physicians patients, health care payors and/or the medical community. We have experienced minimal sales of our Senhance System, to date. We believe that the degree of market acceptance will dependdepends on a number of factors, including:

timing of market introduction of competitive products;

safetygovernment agencies and efficacy of our products;

physician training in the use of our products;

prevalenceservices. Further prolonged government shutdowns or restrictions could impact inspections, regulatory review and severity of any side effects;

potential advantagescertifications, grants or disadvantages over alternative treatments;

strength of marketing and distribution support; and

price of our future products, both in absolute terms and relativeapprovals, or could cause other situations that could impede their ability to alternative treatments.

If applicable, availability of coverage and reimbursement from governmenteffectively deliver healthcare, including attempts to reduce payments and other third-party payorsreimbursements to hospitals by federal healthcare programs. These situations could adversely affect our customers’ ability to perform procedures with our devices and/or their decisions to purchase additional products from us. In addition, the review and clearance, approval, or certification of new products can also impact the acceptancebe affected by a variety of our product offerings.

If we failfactors globally, including government budget and funding levels, global health concerns, ability to attracthire and retain key managementpersonnel and professional personnel, we may be unable to successfully commercialize or develop our products.

We will need to effectively manage our operational, salesaccept the payment of user fees, and marketing, developmentstatutory, regulatory, and policy changes. In addition, government funding of other resources in order to successfully pursue our commercialization andgovernment agencies that fund research and development activities is subject to unpredictable and ever-changing political processes. Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies or Notified Bodies for any of these or other reasons may cause significant regulatory delays and, therefore, delay our efforts for our existingto seek clearances, approvals, or certifications from the FDA, foreign authorities, and future products. Our success dependsnotified bodies and adversely affect business travel and import and export of products, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our continued abilitybusiness, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to attract, retainfurlough critical FDA employees and motivate highly qualified personnel.   If we are not successful in retaining and recruiting highly qualified personnel, our business may be harmed as a result.stop critical activities.

We may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, false claims, privacy and security and physician payment transparency laws. If we are unable to comply, or have not fully complied, with such laws, we could face substantial penalties.

Our business activities are subject to additional healthcare regulation and enforcement by the federal government and by authorities in the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. SuchRestrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our operations (including our marketing, promotion, educational programs, pricing, and relationships with healthcare providers or other entities, among other things) and expose us to areas of risk are described in the “Business-Health Care Regulation” section of this Annual Report.

Additionally, some state privacy laws, may include without limitation, stateprivate rights of action and federal anti-kickback,can lead to class action litigation. Other laws, such as the FCA, can be enforced through qui tam actions brought by individuals on behalf of the government. Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties are compliant with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve the expenditure of appropriate, and possibly significant, resources. Nonetheless, it is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse false claims, privacyor other healthcare laws and security and physician payment transparency laws.regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of such laws that apply to us, we may be subject to significant penalties, including, without limitation, civil, criminal, and criminaladministrative penalties, damages, fines, the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, and imprisonment, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results.

Current legislation and future legislative

Failure of our customers to obtain adequate reimbursement for procedures using our current or regulatory reform of the health care system may affectnew products could limit our ability to sell ourmarket those products profitably.

In the United States, there have been, and we expect there to continue to be, a number of legislative and regulatory initiatives, at both the federal and state government levels, to change the healthcare system in ways that, if approved, could affectdecrease our ability to sell our products profitably. While many of the proposed policy changes require congressional approval to implement, we cannot assure you that reimbursement payments under governmental and private third-party payor programs to health care providers will remain at levels comparable to present levels or will be sufficient to cover the costs allocable to patients eligible for reimbursement under these programs. Any changes that lower reimbursement rates under Medicare, Medicaid or private payor programs could negatively affect our business.generate revenue.

To the extent that any of ourOur products are deemedsold or leased to befacilities, such as hospitals, and are not for use in the home such that they are not durable medical equipment, or DME, they may be subject to distribution under Medicare’s Competitive Acquisition regulations, which could adversely affect the amount that we can seek from payors. Non‑DME devicesequipment. Devices such as ours used in surgical procedures are normally paid directly by the hospital or health care provider and not reimbursedpaid separately by payers, but are reimbursed by third-party payors.payors as part of the payment made for the performed surgical procedure when performed on an outpatient basis, or as part of the payment made for the inpatient stay when the patient undergoing the procedure is an inpatient of a hospital. As a result, these types of devices are subject to intensesignificant price competition that can place a small manufacturer at a competitive disadvantage as hospitals and health care providersfacilities attempt to negotiate lower prices for products such as the ones we develop and sell.


With the continued uncertainty regarding the status

The pricing of the 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation, at this time, the Company is not certainproducts and procedures have come under increasing scrutiny as part of a global trend toward healthcare cost containment. Resulting changes in healthcare law and policy, including changes to theMedicare, may impact of federal health care legislation on its business.  

The 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation subjects manufacturers of medical devices to an excise tax of 2.3% on certain U.S. sales of medical devices beginningour business in January 2013. This excise tax was suspended in December 2017 for two additional years, however, if eventually implemented, this excise tax will likely increase our expenses in the future.

Further, the 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation includes the Open Payments Act (formerly referred to as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act),ways that we cannot currently predict, which in conjunction with its implementing regulations, requires certain manufacturers of certain drugs, biologics, and devices that are reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually certain payments or “transfers of value” provided to physicians and teaching hospitals and to report annually ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members during the preceding calendar year. We provided reports under the Open Payments Act to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS. The failure to report appropriate data accurately, timely, and completely could subject us to significant financial penalties. Other countries and several states currently have similar laws and more may enact similar legislation.

We are unable to predict what additional legislation or regulation relating to the health care industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted in the future or what effect such legislation or regulation would have on our business. Any cost containment measures or other health care system reforms that are adopted could have a material and adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

The United States is considering, or has already enacted or implemented, a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in ways that could affect our ability to commercializesell our existingproducts profitably, described in a streamlined manner below and are described in the “Business-Health Care Regulation” section of this Annual Report Form 10-K. We expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of any products that we develop, and the procedures in which they are used, due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations, and additional legislative and regulatory measures.

The U.S. government and state legislatures have shown significant interest in implementing cost containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid health care costs, including price controls and restrictions on reimbursement. If healthcare policies or reforms intended to curb healthcare costs are adopted, the prices that we charge for our products may be limited, our commercial opportunity may be limited and/or our revenues from sales of our product and any future products, successfully.if approved, may be negatively impacted.

Because

We are subject to an evolving set of complex laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection and information collection matters.

There are numerous state, federal, and foreign laws, regulations, decisions, and directives regarding privacy rights and the processing of information relating to identified or identifiable persons (“Personal Information”) and other categories of data, the scope of which is continually evolving and subject to differing interpretations. We also must comply with the policies, procedures and business requirements of our design, developmentcustomers relating to data privacy and manufacturingsecurity, which can vary based upon the customer, the customer’s industry or location, and the product the customer selects, and which may be more restrictive than the privacy and security measures required by law or regulation. Around the world, the privacy and data protection legal landscape is rapidly changing, which may require us to adjust aspects of our operations or expend significant time and resources to come into compliance with new laws or regulatory obligations.

In particular, the European Economic Area (“EEA”), the United Kingdom and Switzerland have stringent privacy laws and regulations, which may impact our ability to profitably operate in certain European countries or to offer products that meet the needs of customers subject to EU privacy laws and regulations. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) provides that EEA Member States may make their own further laws and regulations limiting the processing of genetic, biometric, or health data, which could limit our ability to use and share Personal Information or could cause our costs to increase and harm our business and financial condition. Non-compliance with the GDPR and the applicable EEA Member State laws may result in fines of up to 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year and other administrative penalties, as well as adverse publicity. It also confers the right for data subjects to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations of the GDPR.

Global laws such as the GDPR are increasingly restricting and regulating the cross-border transfer of Personal Information, which may require us to implement additional and, potentially, costly safeguards to receive Personal Information from overseas customers or transfer such data, including to our vendors. l For example,, in June 2021, the European Commission adopted a new set of Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”), aimed at enabling lawful transfers of Personal Information to non-adequate countries outside the EEA,and on July 10, 2023 the European Commission adopted its adequacy decision for the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, meaning that personal data can now flow freely from the EEA to US companies that participate in the Data Privacy Framework. A lack of valid transfer mechanisms for Personal Information subject to GDPR could increase exposure to enforcement actions as described above, and may affect our business operations and require commercial cost (including potentially limiting our ability to collaborate/work with certain third parties and/or requiring an increase in our data processing capabilities in the EU/U.K.). Further, the EEA/U.K., and Swiss data protection laws (including laws on data transfers as set out above) may also be updated/revised, accompanied by new guidance and/or judicial/regulatory interpretations, which could entail further impacts on our compliance efforts and increased cost.

In addition to the laws specifically discussed, numerous other federal and state laws and regulations govern privacy and security, including state data breach notification laws, state health information and/or genetic privacy laws, and federal and state consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, new state consumer protection laws), many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts. Compliance with these laws is difficult, constantly evolving, time consuming, and requires a flexible privacy framework and substantial resources. Compliance efforts will likely be an increasing and substantial cost in the future. Federal regulators, state attorneys general, and plaintiffs’ attorneys have been and will likely continue to be active in this space.

The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, our customers’ own requirements, the privacy and security laws and regulations, as well as self-regulatory standards that are limited,applicable to us and our customers’ businesses may limit the use and adoption of our products, reduce overall demand and may incur substantial cost or require us to change our business practices. Non-compliance with our customers’ specific requirements may lead to termination of contracts with these customers or liabilities to the customers.

ITEM1.B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM1.C.CYBERSECURITY

We are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we may relycollect, store, process, and transmit sensitive corporate, personal, and other information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, customer data including PII, and other confidential information. It is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of such information.

Risk Management and Strategy

We maintain a cybersecurity risk management program designed to identify, assess, manage, mitigate, and respond to cybersecurity threats. This program is integrated within our enterprise risk management system and addresses the corporate information technology environment, the data we collect through our products and retain in the TRUST registry and Asensus Cloud, and customer information.

The underlying controls of the cybersecurity risk management program are based on recognized best practices and standards for cybersecurity and information technology, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST, Cybersecurity Framework, or CSF, and the International Organization Standardization, or ISO, 27001 Information Security Management System Requirements. We have an annual assessment, performed by a third party, of the Company’s cyber risk management program against the NIST CSF.

We monitor our global cybersecurity environment constantly and coordinate the investigation and remediation of any alerts. We have developed a program for incident response, including drills, to prepare support teams in the event of a significant incident. We have engaged third-party consultants to assist us with designing controls and our cybersecurity risk management framework, and to perform penetration testing. We also retain third parties to design, develop, manufactureassist us with the monitoring and detection of cybersecurity threats and responding to any cybersecurity threats or supply someincidents.

With respect to third parties that manage or use our information technology or data, we obtain reports to assess the security of their systems and processes. We engage in ongoing monitoring of all third-party providers to ensure compliance with our products. An inability to find additional or alternate sources for these services and products could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.cybersecurity standards.

We have used third-party design and development sourcesnot encountered cybersecurity threats or incidents that have had a material impact on our business. We face risks from cybersecurity threats that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or reputation. See “RISK FACTORS Risks Related to assist in the design and developmentOperation of our medical device products. In the future, we may choose to use additional third-party sources for the design and developmentBusiness Significant disruptions of our products. If these design and development partners are unable to provide their services in the timeframeinformation technology systems or to the performance level that we require, we may not be able to establish a contract and obtain a sufficient alternative supply from another supplier on a timely basis and in the manner that we require.

Our products require precise, high quality manufacturing. We and our contract manufacturers will be subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspection by the FDA and non-U.S. regulatory authorities to ensure strict compliance with the quality systems regulations, current “good manufacturing practices” and other applicable government regulations and corresponding standards. If we or our contract manufacturers fail to achieve and maintain high manufacturing standards in compliance with QSR, we may experience manufacturing errors resulting in patient injury or death, product recalls or withdrawals, delays or interruptions of production or failures in product testing or delivery, delay or prevention of filing or approval of marketing applications for our products, cost overruns or other problems that could seriously harm our business.

Any performance failure by us or on the part of our design and development partners or contract manufacturers could delay product development or regulatory clearance or approval of our products, or commercialization of our products and future products, depriving us of potential product revenue and resulting in additional losses. In addition, our dependence on any third party for design, development or manufacturing could adversely affect our future profit margins. Our ability to replace any then-existing manufacturer may be difficult because the number of potential manufacturers is limited and, in the case of Class III devices, the FDA must approve any replacement manufacturer before manufacturing can begin. It may be difficult or impossible for us to identify and engage a replacement manufacturer on acceptable terms in a timely manner, or at all.

We may become subject to potential product liability claims, and we may be required to pay damages that exceed our insurance coverage.

Our business exposes us to potential product liability claims that are inherent in the design, testing, manufacture, sale and distribution of our products and each of our product candidates that we are seeking to introduce to the market. Surgical medical devices involve significant risks of serious complications, including bleeding, nerve injury, paralysis, infection, and even death. Any product liability claim brought against us, with or without merit, could result in the increase of our product liability insurance rates or in our inability to secure coverage in the future on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, if our product liability insurance proves to be inadequate to pay a damage award, we may have to pay the excess of this award out of our cash reserves, which could significantly harm our financial condition. If longer-term patient results and experience indicate that our products or any component of a product causes tissue damage, motor impairment or other adverse effects, we could be subject to significant liability. A product liability claim, even one without merit,data security incidents could harm our reputation, cause us to modify our business practices, and otherwise adversely affect our business and subject us to liability.”

Our Manager of Data and Information Technology and Vice President of Customer Excellence, with consultation and collaboration with senior management lead our cybersecurity efforts. The cybersecurity team is responsible for assessing and managing our cyber risk management program, informing executive management regarding the prevention, detection, mitigation, and remediation of cybersecurity incidents and supervises such efforts. The cybersecurity team has experience selecting, deploying, and operating cybersecurity technologies, initiatives, and processes, and relies on threat intelligence as well as other information obtained from governmental, public or private sources, including external consultants engaged by us.

Governance

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors oversees our cybersecurity risk exposures and the steps taken by management to monitor and mitigate cybersecurity risks. The cybersecurity team briefs the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee on the effectiveness of our cyber risk management program on a regular basis. We believe locating this oversight function in the industry, leadCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee is appropriate given that the reach of our cybersecurity risk monitoring programs are not limited to significant legal fees, and result in the diversionfinancial programs or functions. In addition, cybersecurity risks are reviewed by our Board of management’s attention from managingDirectors, at least annually.

ITEM2.PROPERTIES

Effective March 10, 2021, our business.


ITEM 1.B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

Our principal corporate office is located at 635 Davis1 TW Alexander Drive, Suite 300, Morrisville,160, Durham, North Carolina. We lease this facility, which consists of 37,32827,807 square feet, for a five-yearten year and five month term under a lease that commenced on April 1, 2010. An amendment to this lease was signed on June 13, 2014, extending the lease term until June 30, 2018. Pursuant to a lease entered into on October 24, 2013, we also lease 24,000 square feet of warehouse and office spaceending in Durham, North Carolina. That lease commenced in January 2014 and expired in January 2018.August 2031.

Our Italian research and development and demonstration facilities are located at Viale dell'Innovazione 3, 20126 Milan, Italy. We lease these facilities, which consist of 11,27311,733 square feet, for a six-yearseven-year and three month term ending on JulyDecember 31, 2022,2028, under a lease that commenced on October 1, 2021.

Our Israeli research and development facilities are located at Ha Kadima 9, Fibernet Building, 4th Floor, Yokne'am Illit, Israel. We lease these facilities, which consist of 8,471 square feet, for a five-year term ending on June 30, 2026, under a lease that commenced on July 1, 2021.

Our Japanese office is located at Gotenyama Trust Tower 12F, 4 Chome-7-35 Kitashinagawa, Shinagawa City, Toyko 140-0001, Japan. We lease this facility, which consists of 911 square feet, for a three-year term ending on August 31, 2025, under a lease that commenced on September 1, 2022.

Our Swiss administrative office is located at Via Serafino Balestra 12, Lugano, Switzerland. We lease this facility, which consists of 3,208 square feet, for a five-year renewal term ending on May 12, 2016.31, 2025, under a lease that commenced on July 1, 2018.

ITEM 

ITEM3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  

None.

 

ITEM 

ITEM4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

 

 


PART II

ITEM 

ITEM5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Since April 2, 2014, our common stock has been listed on the NYSE American under theAmerican. Our trading symbol “TRXC.is “ASXC,The table below sets forth, for the respective periods indicated, the high and low bid prices forwhich changed from “TRXC” on March 5, 2021, when we changed our common stock on the NYSE American. The bid prices represent inter-dealer transactions, without adjustments for retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.name from TransEnterix Surgical, Inc. to Asensus Surgical, Inc.

 

 

 

Bid Prices

 

 

 

High

 

 

Low

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter (through February 27, 2018)

 

$

2.19

 

 

$

1.27

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

1.63

 

 

$

1.05

 

Second Quarter

 

 

1.26

 

 

 

0.45

 

Third Quarter

 

 

1.53

 

 

 

0.60

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

5.00

 

 

 

1.32

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

4.79

 

 

$

1.54

 

Second Quarter

 

 

6.10

 

 

 

1.03

 

Third Quarter

 

 

1.97

 

 

 

1.16

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

2.33

 

 

 

1.30

 

Holders

 

As of March 1, 2018,15, 2024, there were approximately 22867 record holders of our common stock (counting all shares held in single nominee registration as one stockholder).

Dividends

We have never declared or paid noany cash dividends or made any other distributionson our common stock. We intend to retain earnings for use in respectthe operation and expansion of our common stock during our fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, and we have no plans to pay any dividends or make any other distributions in the future. In addition, the terms of the Innovatus Loan Agreement prohibit the Company from paying any dividends without the consent of the Lender.business.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.

The Company currently has one equity compensation plan under which it makes awards, the TransEnterix, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan, (the “Plan”). The Plan was originally approved by the Board of Directors and adopted by the majority of our stockholders on November 13, 2007, and amended and restated and approved by the Board of Directors and approved by the majority of our stockholders on May 7, 2015 to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized under the Plan to 11,940,000 shares, and to make other changes. The Plan was amended on June 8, 2016 to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 18,940,000 shares. The Plan was amended on May 25, 2017 to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 25,940,000 shares. The Plan is used for plan-based awards for officers, other employees, consultants, advisors and non-employee directors. In connection with the 2013 merger transaction with SafeStitch Medical, Inc., or the Merger, we assumed all of the options that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger as issued by TransEnterix Surgical, and adjusted based on the Merger at the exchange ratio, which are now exercisable for approximately 1,203,825 shares of common stock. Such options were granted under the TransEnterix, Inc. 2006 Stock Plan (the “2006 Plan”) which was assumed by the Company in the Merger. The 2006 Plan is maintained solely for the purpose of the stock options granted under such 2006 Plan that remain outstanding; no future awards are authorized to be made under the 2006 Plan.

The following table gives information about the Company’s common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and other equity awards as of December 31, 2017:

Plan Category

 

Number of

securities to be

issued upon

exercise of

outstanding

options (1)

 

 

Weighted

average exercise

price of

outstanding

options

 

 

Number of securities

remaining available

for future issuance (2)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

 

18,884,506

 

 

$

1.86

 

 

 

6,491,343

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security

   holders (3)

 

 

1,203,825

 

 

$

1.04

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

20,088,331

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,491,343

 


(1)

Includes 14,489,850 shares underlying outstanding stock options awarded under the Plan and 4,394,656 restricted stock units awarded under the Plan.

(2)

These shares are all available for future awards under the Plan.

(3)

Represents 1,203,825 shares underlying outstanding stock options awarded prior to the Merger under the 2006 Plan and assumed in the Merger.

The graph below matches TransEnterix, Inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the NYSE American index and the RDG SmallCap Medical Devices index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2017.

 

 

12/12

 

12/13

 

12/14

 

12/15

 

12/16

 

12/17

TransEnterix, Inc.

 

100.00

 

750.00

 

264.55

 

225.45

 

118.18

 

175.45

NYSE American

 

100.00

 

104.47

 

105.23

 

75.69

 

89.97

 

91.27

RDG SmallCap Medical Devices

 

100.00

 

172.06

 

160.48

 

119.92

 

125.76

 

177.60

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Recent Sales of EquityUnregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

On September 7, 2017, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of common stock warrants to purchase 950,000 shares to a service provider to the Company.  The issuance of the foregoing securities were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, afforded by Section 3(a)(9) or 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D promulgated thereunder, which exception we believe is available because the securities were not offered pursuant to a general solicitation and such issuances were otherwise made in compliance with the requirements of Regulation D and Rule 506. The securities issued in this transaction may not be resold except pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act or pursuant to a valid exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.ITEM 6.RESERVED

 

On May 5, 2017, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of a common stock warrant to purchase 1,244,746 shares at $1.00 per share to Innovatus Life Sciences Lending Fund I, LP, a new Lender under a Loan Agreement entered into on May 10, 2017. The issuance of the foregoing securities were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act afforded by Section 3(a)(9) or 4(a)(2) thereof, which exception we believe is available because the securities were not offered pursuant to a general solicitation.  The securities issued in this transaction may not be resold except pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act or pursuant to a valid exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  

On September 14, 2016, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of up to 150,000 shares of common stock to a vendor of the Company in lieu of a cash payment.  To date, the Company has issued a total of 95,678 shares of the Company’s common stock to such vendor. The issuance of the foregoing securities were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act afforded by Section 3(a)(9) or 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D promulgated thereunder, which exception we believe is available because the securities were not offered pursuant to a general solicitation and such issuances were otherwise made in compliance with the requirements of Regulation D and Rule 506. The securities issued in this transaction may not be resold except pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act or pursuant to a valid exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

The Company did not purchase any of its common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2017.ITEM7.MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The table below shows selected consolidated financial data. The statements of operations and comprehensive loss data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are derived from our financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The statements of operations and comprehensive loss data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are derived from our financial statements not included in this Annual Report. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of financial results to be achieved in future periods.

Year ended December 31,

 

2017(1)

 

 

2016(1)

 

 

2015 (1)

 

 

2014 (2)

 

 

2013 (3)(4)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

$

7,111

 

 

$

1,519

 

 

$

 

 

$

401

 

 

$

1,431

 

Income (loss)

 

$

(144,796

)

 

$

(119,980

)

 

$

(46,948

)

 

$

(37,652

)

 

$

(28,358

)

Income (loss)  per common share

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(1.07

)

 

$

(0.59

)

 

$

(0.64

)

 

$

(2.23

)

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

250,251

 

 

$

176,249

 

 

$

248,602

 

 

$

135,111

 

 

$

116,714

 

Long-term obligations (5)

 

$

28,473

 

 

$

27,690

 

 

$

40,253

 

 

$

9,175

 

 

$

4,602

 

(1)

Includes the assets and liabilities of TransEnterix Italia acquired and assumed in the Senhance Acquisition, which occurred on September 21, 2015. See the description titled “Senhance Acquisition and Related Transactions” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report.

(2)

On March 31, 2014, we effectuated a reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 1 for 5. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, our issued and outstanding stock decreased from 244,276,923 to 48,855,255 shares of common stock, all with a par value of $0.001. All information related to common stock, preferred stock and earnings per share for prior periods has been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the Reverse Stock Split.

(3)

On September 3, 2013, TransEnterix Surgical, Inc. a Delaware corporation, and SafeStitch Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation or SafeStitch consummated a merger transaction whereby TransEnterix Surgical merged with a merger subsidiary of SafeStitch, with TransEnterix Surgical as the surviving entity in the merger or Merger. As a result of the Merger, TransEnterix Surgical became a wholly owned subsidiary of SafeStitch. On December 6, 2013, SafeStitch changed its name to TransEnterix, Inc.  The Merger was a reverse merger for accounting purposes with TransEnterix Surgical as the acquiring company. Therefore, from September 3, 2013 forward the financial statements of the Company are the historical financial statements of TransEnterix Surgical with the addition of SafeStitch as of the date of the Merger.

(4)

Represents the financial statements of TransEnterix Surgical for the period from January 1, 2013 to September 2, 2013.

(5)

Long-term obligations include: (1) cash consideration installments to be paid to Sofar in connection with the Senhance Acquisition; (2) outstanding amounts under a Loan Agreement, first entered into by TransEnterix Surgical in January 2012 and amended from time to time since such time and replaced in 2017; (3) in 2017, 2016 and 2015 net deferred tax liabilities; and (4) in 2013, promissory notes of SafeStitch, which were converted into equity securities of the Company in 2013.


ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our “Risk Factors”Risk Factors and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements. See cautionary note regarding “Forward-Looking Statements”Forward-Looking Statements at the beginning of this Annual Report.

Overview

TransEnterix

Asensus Surgical, Inc. (along with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) is a medical device company that is digitizing the interface between the surgeon and the patient to improvepioneer a new era called “Performance-Guided Surgery™”, or PGS, by unlocking clinical intelligence for surgeons to enable consistently superior outcomes to patients. Built upon the foundations of digital laparoscopy and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery by addressing(which remains the gold standard of surgery today), the Company is pioneering PGS to increase surgeon control and reduce surgical variability. With the addition of machine vision, Augmented Intelligence and deep learning capabilities throughout the surgical experience delivered via the Senhance® Surgical System, combined with the Intelligent Surgical Unit™ (ISU™) the Company intends to holistically address the current clinical, surgeon performance (fatigue and ergonomics) and economic challenges associated with current laparoscopic and robotic optionsshortcomings that impact surgical outcomes in today'sa value-based healthcare environment. The Company is focused onalso working to incorporate all of this in its next generation robotic system we call the commercialization of the Senhance™LUNA™ Surgical System, which digitizes laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery. The system allows for robotic precision, haptic feedback, surgeon camera control via eye sensing and improved ergonomics while offering responsible economics.System.

The Senhance System has been granted a CE Mark in Europe for laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic surgery, as well as limited thoracic operations excluding cardiac and vascular surgery. In April 2017, the Company submitted a 510(k) application to the FDA for the Senhance System. On October 13, 2017, the Company received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for use in laparoscopic colorectal and gynecologic surgery.  These indications cover 23 procedures, including benign and oncologic procedures.  We anticipate expanding the indications for use in the middle of 2018.

The Senhance System is available for sale in Europe, the U.S.,United States, Japan, Taiwan, Russia (to the EUextent lawful), and select other countries.

The Company also enters into lease arrangements with certain qualified customers. For some lease arrangements, the customers are provided with the right to purchase the leased Senhance System is a multi-portduring or at the end of the lease term ("Lease Buyout").

During 2023, the Company focused its research and development, or R&D, activities on advancing the LUNA Surgical System, its next generation robotic surgery system, which allows multiple robotic arms to control instruments and a camera. The system features advanced technology to enable surgeons with haptic feedback and the ability to moveongoing developments in the camera via eye movement.ISU and digital surgery offerings.

We believe the LUNA System we are developing will be a “best in class” robot that will use 3mm and 5mm instruments (as contrasted with most current systems available that use 8mm instruments), including TrueWrist™ fully wristed 5mm instruments. The LUNA System will also feature monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery capabilities, rapid instrument exchange with the Company’s proprietary instrument drive system, replicates laparoscopic motion that is familiar to experienced surgeons, and integrates three-dimensional high definition vision technology. The Senhance System also offers responsible economics to hospitals by offering robotic technologyan open platform with reusable instruments thereby reducing additional costs per surgery whena smaller footprint in the OR (as compared to other robotic solutions.the Senhance System), up to four-arm configuration with enhanced manipulation and dexterity, a surgeon console with 4K-3D capabilities and unconstrained handles with improved digital features while retaining haptic feedback.

The Company has also developed the SurgiBot System, a single-port, robotically enhanced laparoscopic surgical platform. On

In December 18, 2017,2023, the Company announced that it hadsuccessfully hosted a surgeon lab to conduct an in vivo evaluation of the LUNA System’s hardware, software and instruments in porcine models. The lab allowed nine participating independent surgeons to evaluate the LUNA System’s functionality through thirteen surgical procedures across gynecology, urology and general surgery.

Also, to prepare for pilot manufacturing of the LUNA System, in 2023 the Company entered into an agreement with Great Belief International Limited, or GBIL,Flextronics Medical Sales and Marketing, Ltd. for the design and manufacturing support.

The LUNA System will continue the Company’s tradition of providing instruments that are reusable and can be re-sterilized and reprocessed, and, with improvements in manufacturing, are expected to advancehave lower costs per procedure compared to competitive robotic options.

The Company’s 2023 development efforts for digital surgery with the SurgiBot System towards global commercialization.  TheISU included:

initial development of an analytical tools feature set which includes intra-operative surgical planning capabilities that will help surgeons to map out and plan for specific surgical actions intraoperatively using the ISU’s Augmented Intelligence features;

creation of a safety tools feature set which includes real-time identification, notifications to the surgical team and marking of potential anatomical hazards (such as arteries or nerves) during the operation, and providing visual cues to help surgeons and surgical team protect these structures; and

advancing a training tools and education feature set which allows multiple team members to work together in real time by annotating, highlighting and drawing on a shared visual display of the surgical field to communicate and provide expert support.

During 2023 the Company entered into an agreement transfers ownershipwith NVIDIA to allow the Company to enhance the capabilities of the SurgiBot System assets, whileISU. Using a suite of NVIDIA tools, the Company retainswill refine ISU features like digital tags, 3D measurement and enhanced intra-operative camera control. The Company believes that the option to distribute or co-distribute the SurgiBot System outsidecollection and analysis of China. Upon completion of the transfer of all SurgiBot System assets, GBILsurgical data transformed into insights, and when shared with our physicians, will have the SurgiBot System manufactured in Chinaenhance surgical planning, surgeon education and obtain Chinese regulatory clearance from the China Foodtraining, and Drug Administration, or CFDA, while entering into a nationwide distribution agreement with China National Scientific and Instruments and Materials Company, or CSIMC, for the Chinese market.  The agreement providespromote better patient outcomes.

During 2023, the Company announced a multi-year collaboration with proceeds of at least $29 million, of which $7.5 million was receivedGoogle Cloud to integrate Google Cloud’s secure cloud data architecture and machine learning technologies to further expand cloud capabilities. The Asensus Cloud is being designed to enable customer access to a web portal and/or mobile application that can provide data, analytics and/or insights to assist in December 2017. An additional $7.5 millionpre-operative surgical planning, post-operative surgical analysis and best practices guidance.

The Company is expectedalso developing an ISU that can be utilized on a stand-alone basis apart from robotic surgery. The Company believes, given the market opportunity in traditional laparoscopic procedures, the data collected from such stand-alone units will add significantly to be received by March 31, 2018, including a $3.0 million equity investment at $2.33 per share. The remaining $14 million, representing minimum royalties, will be paid beginning at the earlier of receipt of Chinese regulatory approval or five years.

We believe that future outcomes of minimally invasive surgery will be enhanced through our combination of more advanced toolsits cumulative digital database and robotic functionality, which are designed to: (i) empower surgeons with improved precision, dexterity and visualization; (ii) improve patient satisfaction and enable a desirable post-operative recovery; and (iii) provide a cost-effective robotic system, comparedhelp to existing alternatives today, for a wide range of clinical applications. Our strategy is to focus on the commercialization and furtheraccelerate development of innovative solutions across the Senhance System.surgical continuum to reduce complications and improve efficiency.

From our inception, we devoted a substantial percentage of our resources to research and development and start-up activities, consisting primarily of product design and development, clinical studies, manufacturing, recruiting qualified personnel and raising capital. We expect to continue to invest in research and development and market development as we implement our strategy.

Since inception, we have been unprofitable. As of December 31, 2017,2023, we had an accumulated deficit of $447.6 million.

We expect$939.4 million, and there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue to invest in research and development and sales and marketing and increase selling, general and administrative expenses as we grow. As a result, we will need to generate significant revenue in order to achieve profitability.

going concern. We operate in one business segment.


Debt Refinancing

On May 10, 2017, the Company and its domestic subsidiaries, as co-borrowers, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement, or the Innovatus Loan Agreement with Innovatus Life Sciences Lending Fund I, LP, as Lender and Collateral Agent, or the Lender.  Under the Innovatus Loan Agreement, the Lender has agreed to make certain term loans in the aggregate principal amount of up to $17,000,000. Funding of the first $14,000,000 tranche occurred on May 10, 2017. The Company will be eligible to draw on the second tranche of $3,000,000 upon achievement of certain milestones. So long as the Company meets each Interest-Only Milestone (as defined below), the Company is entitled to make interest-only payments for up to twenty-four (24) months. At the end of the interest-only period, the Company will be required to repay the term loans over a two-year period, based on a twenty-four (24) month amortization schedule, with a final maturity date occurring on the fourth anniversary of the initial funding date.  However, the interest-only period will end if the Company fails to meet any Interest-Only Milestone. Commencing on the first day of the month following such failure to achieve an Interest-Only Milestone, the Company will be required to repay the term loans over a two year period, based on a twenty-four (24) month amortization schedule.  The Interest-Only Milestones require the Company to (i) achieve certain twelve month revenue targets, measured quarterly, commencing with quarter ending March 31, 2018, (ii) meet a minimum capital raising threshold through the sale and issuance of equity securities during the period from April 10, 2017 through May 31, 2018 and (iii) obtain clearance for commercialization of the Senhance System by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the Senhance Clearance, by May 30, 2018.  Each such milestone is referred to as an Interest-Only Milestone. In connection with its entrance into the Innovatus Loan Agreement, the Company repaid its existing credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank and Oxford Finance LLC under the SVB Loan Agreement.

 

The term loans bear interest at a fixed rate equal to 11% per annum,As of which 2.5% can be paid in-kind and added to the outstanding principal amount of the term loans until the earlier of (i) the first anniversary following the funding date and (ii) the Company’s failure to achieve an Interest-Only Milestone.  The Company will be required to repay the term loans if they are accelerated following an event of default.  In addition, the Company is permitted to prepay the term loans in full at any time upon five (5) business days’ written notice to the Lender.  Upon the earliest to occur of the maturity date, acceleration of the term loan, or prepayment of the term loan, the Company is required to make a final payment equal to the total term loan commitment multiplied by four percent (4%); provided, however, that in the event the Company refinances its obligations with the Lender after Senhance Clearance, no final fee or prepayment fee described below will be due; and provided, further, that if the Company elects to refinance its obligations prior to the funding of the second tranche, the final fee with respect to the second tranche shall be paid in full on the date of this filing, the Company continues to manage cash prudently and believes it has cash into early June 2024. We are actively pursuing a number of financing options, including collaborations, contractual relationships and strategic transactions. However, we are aware that such refinancing. Any prepaymentalternatives are and may continue to be time consuming and that successful consummation of a transaction or transactions is not assured. We may need to pursue alternative pathways, including, but not limited to, debt financing, sale of assets or equity-based financing. If none of these alternatives are consummated, we may need to suspend our product development programs, including the term loans in full, whether mandatoryLUNA System, and take other actions to preserve cash. We may also need to seek bankruptcy if these measures are insufficient or voluntary, must include (i) the final fee, (ii) interest at the default rate (which is the rate otherwise applicable plus five percent (5%)) with respect to any amounts past due, (iii) the Lender’s expenses and all other obligations that are due and payable to the Lender and (iv) a prepayment fee of three percent (3%) if the term loan is paid in full on or before the first anniversary of the effective date, two percent (2%) if paid off after the first anniversary but on or before the second anniversary of the effective date and one percent (1%) if paid off after the second anniversary but on or before the third anniversary of the effective date.unsuccessful.

 

In connection with the funding,Recent Financing Transactions

2022 At-the -Market Offering

On March 18, 2022, the Company paidentered a facility fee of $170,000 on the date of funding of the first tranche.  In addition,Controlled Equity OfferingSales Agreement (the “2022 Sales Agreement”), with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. The Company commenced an at-the-market offering (the “2022 ATM Offering”) pursuant to which the Company issued warrantscould sell from time to the Lendertime, at its option, up to purchasean aggregate of $100.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock. AdditionalSales during the year ended December 31, 2023, under the 2022 ATM Offering are as follows (in thousands except for share and per share amounts):

  

Year Ended

December 31, 2023

 

Total shares of common stock sold

  933,672 

Average price per share

 $0.43 

Gross proceeds

 $403 

Commission paid to Agents

 $12 

Net proceeds

 $391 

2023 Registered Direct Offering

On July 27, 2023, the Company sold, in a registered direct offering, an aggregate of 23,809,524 shares of common stock, and warrants will be issued on the funding date of each subsequent tranche and will expire five (5) years from such issue date. The warrants issued in connection with funding of the first tranche entitle the Lender to purchase up to 1,244,746 shares23,809,524 of the Company’s common stock shares at an exercise price of $1.00$0.42 per share.

The Company’s obligations under the Innovatus Loan Agreement are secured by a security interest in all of the assets of the Company and its current and future domestic and material foreign subsidiaries, including a security interest in the intellectual property.  The Innovatus Loan Agreement contains customary representations and covenants that, subject to exceptions, restrict the Company’s ability to do the following things: declare dividends or redeem or repurchase equity interests; incur additional liens; make loans and investments; incur additional indebtedness; engage in mergers, acquisitions, and asset sales; transact with affiliates; undergo a change in control; add or change business locations; and engage in businesses that are not related to its existing business. Under the terms of the Innovatus Loan Agreement, the Company is required to maintain minimum unrestricted cash in an amount equal to (x) six million dollars ($6,000,000) at all times prior to Senhance Clearance; and (y) at all times thereafter, the lesser of (i) $6,000,000, (ii) the Company’s trailing three (3) months’ cash used to fund operating activities, as determined as of the most recent month end and (iii) the then outstanding principal amount of the term loans, together with accrued but unpaid interest.


Public Offering of Units

On April 28, 2017, we entered into an underwriting agreement with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, or the Underwriter, relating to an underwritten public offering ofcommon share (the "warrants”), for an aggregate of 24,900,000 Units, each consisting of one share of the Company’s Common Stock, a Series A Warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock and a Series B Warrant to purchase 0.75 shares of Common Stock at an offering price to the public of $1.00 per Unit. Certain of the Company’s officers, directors and existing stockholders purchased approximately $2.5 million of Units in the public offering. The closing of the public offering occurred on May 3, 2017.

Each Series A Warrant had an initial exercise price of $1.00 per share and was able to be exercised$10.0 million. Warrants are exercisable at any time beginning on or after the date of issuance and from time to time thereafter, through and includingwill expire five years after the first anniversarydate of issuance. Based on the assessment of the issuance date, unless terminated earlierwarrants’ specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480 and ASC 815, the Company determined that warrants do not meet the requirements for equity classification. Accordingly, warrants are recorded as provided ina liability on the Series A Warrant. Receipt of 510(k) clearance for the Senhance System on October 13, 2017, triggered the acceleration of the expiration date of the Series A Warrants to October 31, 2017.  As of December 31, 2017, all of the Series A Warrants had been exercised.

Each Series B Warrant has anCompany’s balance sheet at their initial exercise price of $1.00 per share and may be exercised at any time beginningestimated fair value on the date of issuance and from timeissuance. For additional information regarding the fair value of warrant liability, please refer to time thereafter through and including the fifth anniversary of the issuance date, or by May 3, 2022. As of December 31, 2017, Series B Warrants representing approximately 8.9 million shares had been exercised.Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements.

The exercise prices and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the outstanding Series B Warrants are subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including, but not limited to, stock splits or dividends, business combinations, sale of assets, similar recapitalization transactions, or other similar transactions. The Series B Warrants are subject to adjustment in the event that the Company issues or is deemed to issue shares of common stock for less than the then applicable exercise price of the Series B Warrants. The exercisability of the Series B Warrants may be limited if, upon exercise, the holder or any of its affiliates would beneficially own more than 4.99% of our common stock. If, at any time Series B Warrants are outstanding, any fundamental transaction occurs, as described in the Series B Warrants and generally including any consolidation or merger into another corporation, the consummation of a transaction whereby another entity acquires more than 50% of the Company’s outstanding voting stock, or the sale of all or substantially all of its assets, the successor entity must assume in writing all of the obligations to the Series B Warrant holders. Additionally, in the event of a fundamental transaction, each Series B Warrant holder will have the right to require the Company, or its successor, to repurchase the Series B Warrants for an amount of cash equal to the Black-Scholes value of the remaining unexercised portion of such Series B Warrants.

The underwriting agreement contains customary representations, warranties and agreements by the Company, customary conditions to closing, indemnification obligations of the Company and the Underwriters, including for liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, other obligations of the parties and termination provisions. The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the underwriting agreement were made only for purposes of such agreement and as of specific dates, were solely for the benefit of the parties to such agreement, and may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties.

The net proceeds to the Company from the offering were approximately $23.2allocated $7.1 million prior to any exercise of the Series A Warrants or Series B Warrants, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses paid by the Company. The net proceeds to the Company from the exercise of all of the Series A Warrants and the Series B Warrants exercised prior to December 31, 2017 were approximately $33.6 million.

The Units were issued pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated April 28, 2017 and an accompanying base prospectus dated June 22, 2016 that form a part of the registration statement on Form S-3 that the Company filed with the SEC on November 7, 2014 and was declared effective on December 19, 2014 (File No. 333-199998), and post-effectively amended pursuant to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3, as filed with the SEC on March 8, 2016 and declared effective on June 22, 2016 and a related registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.

On December 15, 2017, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-222103) to register shares of common stock underlying outstanding Series B Warrants previously issued as part of the Company’s May 3, 2017 public offering.  The new registration statement replaced the registration statement on Form S-3 that expired on December 19, 2017 with respect to these securities.  On January 26, 2018, we filed an Amendment No. 1 to such registration statement on Form S-3 to update the information, in the registration statement.  The registration statement covers up to 9,579,884 shares of common stock underlying the outstanding Series B Warrants.  This registration statement on Form S-3 was declared effective on January 29, 2018.  


Lincoln Park Purchase Agreement

On December 16, 2016, we entered into a purchase agreement, or the LPC Purchase Agreement, with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, or Lincoln Park, pursuant to which we had the right to sell to Lincoln Park up to an aggregate of $25,000,000 in shares of our common stock, subject to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the LPC Purchase Agreement.  Effective April 27, 2017, we terminated the LPC Purchase Agreement. The LPC Purchase Agreement provided us with an election to terminate the Purchase Agreement for any reason or for no reason by delivering a notice to Lincoln Park, and we did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the LPC Purchase Agreement. Prior to termination, we sold shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park under the LPC Purchase Agreement for gross proceeds of approximately $5.7 million.

At-the-Market Offerings

On February 9, 2016, we entered into a Controlled Equity Offering SM Sales Agreement, or the “2016 Sales Agreement, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., or Cantor, under which we could offer and sell, through Cantor, up to approximately $43.6 million in shares of common stock in an at-the market offering, or the 2016 ATM Offering. The 2016 Sales Agreement was terminated, effective September 10, 2017. On February 20, 2015, we had entered into a Controlled Equity Offering SM Sales Agreement, or the 2015 Sales Agreement, with Cantor, as sales agent, pursuant to which we offered and sold, through Cantor, $25.0 million in shares of common stock in an at-the-market offering from February 2015 through February 2016, or the 2015 ATM Offering. All sales of shares under these offerings were made pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC. We paid Cantor a commission of approximately 3% of the aggregate gross proceeds received from all salesto warrants based on their estimated fair value, with the residual amount of $2.9 million allocated to common stock. Offering related issuance costs were approximately $1.0 million and consisted primarily of placement agent’s fees and legal expenses. Issuance costs were allocated to common stock underand warrant liability proportionally to the 2015 Sales Agreement and the 2016 Sales Agreement.

On August 31, 2017, we entered into an At-the-Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement, or the 2017 Sales Agreement, with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, or Stifel, under which we could offer and sell, through Stifel, up to approximately $50.0 million in shares of common stock in an at-the-market offering, or the 2017 ATM Offering. All sales of shares were made pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC. We paid Stifel a commission of approximately 3%allocation of the aggregate gross proceeds received from all salespurchase price. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded $0.7 million of common stock underother expense in the 2017 Sales Agreement. Asstatement of October 31, 2017, the 2017 ATM Offering was completed.operations related to issuance costs allocated to warrant liability.

The following table summarizes the total sales under the 2015 Sales Agreement, 2016 Sales Agreement and 2017 Sales Agreement

Results of Operations for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share amounts):Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

 

 

 

2017 Sales

Agreement

 

 

2016 Sales

Agreement

 

 

2015 Sales

Agreement

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2017

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2016

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2016

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2015

 

 

Total shares of common stock sold

 

 

15,998.5

 

 

 

8,763.4

 

 

 

5,710.2

 

 

 

2,014.3

 

 

Average price per share

 

$

3.13

 

 

$

4.70

 

 

$

3.23

 

 

$

3.25

 

 

Gross proceeds

 

$

50,000

 

 

$

41,156

 

 

$

18,454

 

 

$

6,546

 

 

Commissions earned by Stifel or Cantor

 

$

1,500

 

 

$

1,235

 

 

$

553

 

 

$

197

 

 

Other issuance costs

 

$

97

 

 

$

185

 

 

$

 

 

$

259

 

 

Revenue

Senhance AcquisitionBoth in 2023 and Related Transactions

Membership Interest Purchase Agreement and Amendment

On September 21, 2015, the Company announced that it had entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated September 18, 2015 with Sofar S.p.A., as the Seller, Vulcanos S.r.l., as the acquired company, and TransEnterix International, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company as the Buyer. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement occurred on September 21, 2015.  The Buyer acquired all of the membership interests of the acquired company from the Seller, and changed the name of the acquired company to TransEnterix Italia S.r.l. On the closing date, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company completed the strategic acquisition from Sofar S.p.A. of all of the assets, employees and contracts related to the advanced robotic system for minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery now known as the Senhance System, or the Senhance Acquisition.


Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the consideration2022, revenue consisted of the issuancesales of 15,543,413 sharesSenhance Systems, ongoing System leasing payments, sales of the Company’s common stock, or the Securities Consideration, and approximately $25,000,000 U.S. Dollars and €27,500,000 Euro in cash consideration, or the Cash Consideration. The Securities Consideration was issued in full at closing of the acquisition; the Cash Consideration was or will be paid in four tranches, with US $25,000,000 paid at closing and the remaining Cash Consideration of €27,500,000 to be paid in three additional tranches based on achievement of negotiated milestones. On December 30, 2016, the Company and Sofar entered into an Amendment to the Purchase Agreement to restructure the terms of the second tranche of the Cash Consideration. Under the Amendment, the second tranche was restructured to reduce the contingent cash consideration by €5.0 million in exchange for the issuance of 3,722,685 shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate fair market value of €5.0 million, which were issued on January 4, 2017. The price per share was $1.404 and was calculated based on the average of the closing prices of the Company’s common stock on ten consecutive trading days ending one day before the execution of the Amendment. 

The issuance of the initial Securities Consideration was effected as a private placement of securities under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and Regulation D promulgated thereunder.  The issuance of the additional shares in January 2017 was made under an existing shelf registration statement on Form S-3.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company has paid all Cash Consideration due under the second tranche and €1.8 million due under the fourth tranche.

The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and warranties of the parties and the parties have customary indemnification obligations, which are subject to certain limitations described further in the Purchase Agreement.

Registration Rights and Lock-Up Agreements

In connection with the Senhance Acquisition, we also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2015, with the Seller, pursuant to which we agreed to register the Securities Consideration shares for resale following the end of the lock-up periods described below. The resale Registration Statement has been filed and is effective.

In connection with the Senhance Acquisition, Sofar entered into a Lock-Up Agreement with us pursuant to which Sofar agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell, transfer or otherwise convey any of the Securities Consideration over a two-year period following the Closing Date. As of September 21, 2017, all of the Securities Consideration was released from the lock-up restrictions and is eligible to be resold under the effective resale registration statement.  

2015 Public Offering

On June 11, 2015, we sold 16,666,667 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $3.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $50.0 million in an underwritten firm commitment public offering. We granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 2,500,000 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments. The common stock was offered and sold pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-199998) registering an aggregate of $100.0 million of our designated securities. The closing of the public offering occurred on June 17, 2015. On July 10, 2015, the underwriters exercised a portion of their over-allotment option to acquire an additional 2,075,000 shares at the public offering price of $3.00 per share for aggregate additional gross proceeds of $6.2 million. The purchase of the over-allotment shares closed on July 15, 2015. Total proceeds were $52.2 million, net of issuance costs of $4.0 million.

Results of Operations

Our results of operations include the operations of TransEnterix Italia from the Senhance Acquisition date of September 21, 2015 forward.

Revenue

In 2017, our revenue consisted of product and service revenue resulting from a total of four Senhance Systems: Europe (two), Asia (one) and the United States (one), and related instruments, accessories and services. In 2016, our revenue consisted of product and service revenue resulting from the sale in Europe of a Senhance System, instruments and accessories, and related services. We recognizeservices revenue when persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, delivery has occurredfor Senhance Systems sold or service has been rendered,placed in Europe, Asia, and the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Amounts billedU.S. in excess of the associated revenue recognized are deferred.prior periods.


We expect to experience some unevenness in the number and trend, and average selling price, of units sold on a quarterly basis given the early stage of commercialization of our products.

Product and service revenue for the year ended December 31, 20172023 increased to $7.1$5.5 million compared to $1.5$4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2022. The $5.6$1.2 million increase was primarily the result of three Senhance System sales in the revenue recognized oncurrent year compared to two Senhance System sales in the sale of four Senhance Systems, net of deferred revenue.prior year.

Product and service

Service revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased2023 decreased to $1.5$1.1 million compared to $0$1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2022. The $1.5$0.3 million decrease was due to a decrease in the number of Senhance Systems under service contracts.

Lease revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023 increased to $2.0 million compared to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The $0.6 million increase was the result of the revenue recognized on the saleadditional lease placements in 2023.

Cost of one Senhance System, net of deferred revenue, during the third quarter of 2016.Revenue

Cost of Revenue

Costrevenue consists of revenues consists primarily of costs related to contract manufacturing, materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. We expenseoverhead incurred internally to produce the products. Shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company are included in cost of revenue. The Company expenses all inventory excess and obsolescence provisions as cost of revenues.revenue. The manufacturing overhead costs include the cost of quality assurance, material procurement, inventory control, facilities, equipment depreciation and operations supervision and management. We expect overhead costs as a percentage of revenues to become less significant as our production volume increases. We expect

Product cost of revenues to increase in absolute dollars to the extent our revenues grow and as we continue to invest in our operational infrastructure to support anticipated growth.

Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 20172023 increased to $6.7$6.9 million as compared to $1.1$5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This2022. The $1.6 million increase overconsists of a $0.9 million increase in materials costs primarily related to three Senhance System sales in the current year compared to two Senhance System sales in the prior year, period was the result of increased salesa $0.5 million increase in personnel costs, a $0.1 million increase in supplies and costs for manufacturing overhead and field service.a $0.1 million increase in consulting expenses.

Cost of revenue

Service cost for the year ended December 31, 20162023 increased to $1.1$2.3 million as compared to $0$2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This2022. The $0.1 million increase overprimarily relates to a $0.2 million increase in supplies and a $0.1 million increase in personnel costs partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in material costs and a $0.1 million decrease in consulting expenses. Service cost typically exceeds revenue primarily due to part replacements under maintenance plans, which are expensed when incurred, along with salaries for the priorfield service teams.

Lease cost for the year period wasended December 31, 2023 increased to $4.0 million as compared to $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The $0.6 million increase primarily relates to a $0.3 million increase in material costs as a result of the costs recognizeda higher number of systems under lease and a $0.3 million increase in connection with the sale of one Senhance System during the third quarter of 2016. The $1.1 million cost of revenue primarily represents the fair value of the Senhance System determined using the acquisition method of accounting at the Senhance Acquisition date.depreciation.

Research and Development

Research and development, or R&D, expenses primarily consist of engineering, product development and regulatory expenses incurred in the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products and legal services associated with ourthe Company’s efforts to obtain and maintain broad protection for the intellectual property related to ourits products. In future periods, we expectthe Company expects R&D expenses to remain consistent or be modestly lower as we continue to transition our investments into commercial activities.substantially increase as it invests in the LUNA™ Surgical System and digital laparoscopy platform. R&D expenses are expensed as incurred.

R&D expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased 25%2023 increased 28% to $22.0$37.0 million as compared to $29.3$28.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2022 as the Company continues to invest in basic research, clinical studies, and product development in the areas of robotics and digital technologies supporting the LUNA System and its digital laparoscopy platform. All activities are in the effort of building the future for Performance-Guided Surgery. The $7.3$8.1 million decrease resultedincrease primarily from decreasedrelates to a $2.9 million increase in personnel costs, of $4.0a $2.3 million decreased supplies expense of $1.9 million, decreasedincrease in contract engineering services, consulting, and other outside services, an $1.4 million increase in IT costs, an $1.3 million increase in supplies costs and a $0.2 million increase in testing and enhancement of $2.0 million and decreased other costs of $0.1 million, offset by increased stock compensation costs of $0.7 millionour products.

R&D expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased 1% to $29.3 million as compared to $29.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The $0.4 million decrease resulted primarily from decreased supplies expense of $3.7 million and decreased contract engineering services, consulting and other outside services of $3.6 million, offset by increased preclinical lab expense of $3.8 million, increased facility costs of $0.9 million, increased stock compensation costs of $0.8 million, increased travel related expenses of $0.5 million, increased other costs of $0.6 million and increased personnel related costs of $0.3 million.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses include costs for sales and marketing personnel, travel, demonstration product, market development, physician training, tradeshows, marketing clinical studies and consulting expenses. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase significantly in 2018 in support of our Senhance System commercialization.

Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 20172023 increased 90%14% to $17.5$16.9 million compared to $9.2$14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2022. The $8.3$2.1 million increase was primarily related to increaseda $2.7 million increase in personnel related costs of $3.0and a $0.2 million increased consulting and outside service costs of $1.8 million, increased depreciation expense $1.0 million, increased travel related expenses of $0.8 million, increased stock compensation costs of $0.5 million, increased demonstration product costs of $0.5 million, increased tradeshow costs ofincrease in supplies, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in consulting expenses, $0.2 million decrease in depreciation and increased$0.2 million decrease in other costs of $0.3 million, as we increased our U.S. sales and marketing team following receipt of 510(k) clearance for the Senhance System.


Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased 217% to $9.2 million compared to $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The $6.3 million increase was primarily related to increased personnel related costs of $2.6 million, increased travel related expenses of $1.0 million, increased consulting costs of $0.9 million, increased tradeshow costs of $0.5 million, increased stock compensation costs of $0.5 million, increased other costs of $0.6 million and increased depreciation expense of $0.2 million.costs.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist of personnel costs related to the executive, finance, legal, IT and human resource functions, as well as professional service fees, legal fees, accounting fees, insurance costs, and general corporate expenses. In future periods, we expect general and administrative expenses to increase to support our sales, marketing, and research and development efforts.

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased 14%2023 decreased 5% to $12.3$19.2 million compared to $10.8$20.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2022. The $1.5$1.0 million decrease was primarily related to a $1.1 million reduction in IT costs, an $0.8 million decrease in personnel costs and an $0.2 million decrease in corporate insurance expenses, partially offset by an $0.8 million increase was primarily due to increased stock compensationin amortization of the implementation costs of $0.7 million, increased personnel costs of $0.5 millionthe enterprise resource planning system and increased other costs of $1.0 million offset by decreased legal, accounting, and investor relationsoftware licensing fees, and other public company costs of $0.7 million.

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased 38% to $10.8 million compared to $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The $3.0a $0.3 million increase was primarily due to increased legal, accounting, and investor relation fees and other public company costs of $1.8 million, increased stock compensation costs of $0.5 million, increased personnel costs of $0.4 million, and increased other costs of $0.3 million.in consulting expenses.

Amortization of Intangible Assets

Amortization of intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased2023 decreased to $7.9$0.5 million compared to $7.0$7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2022. The $0.9$7.2 million increase wasdecrease is primarily the result of amortization of developed technology related to the acquisition of the Senhance System on September 21, 2015 and the amortization of in-process research and development transferred to intellectual property in October 2017.

Amortization of intangible assets fordeveloped technologies intangibles that fully depreciated during the year ended December 31, 2016 increased to $7.0 million compared to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The $4.8 million increase was primarily the result of amortization of developed technology related to the acquisition of the Senhance System on September 21, 2015.2022.

Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration

The change in fair value of contingent consideration in connection with the Senhance Acquisition was $2.0a $1.0 million increase for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to a $1.1 million reduction for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily due to changes in market assumptions and the discount rate utilized.

Property and Equipment Impairment

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.4 million compared to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20172022, to reduce the carrying value of property and equipment to its estimated fair value. The change was primarily related to the changelower returned Senhance Systems under operating leases and a reduction in Senhance Systems under operating leases that are not expected timelines for the achievementto generate future cash flows sufficient to recover their net book value.

Other Income, net

The change in fair value of contingent consideration in connection with the Senhance Acquisition was $0.5Company recognized $1.3 million other income for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily related2023, compared to the Amendment to the Purchase Agreement for the second tranche, the change in expected timelines for the achievement of milestones, the effect of the passage of time on the fair value measurement and the impact of foreign currency exchange rates.  

Issuance costs for Warrants

Issuance costs of $0.6 million were allocated to the Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants issued in April 2017.

Inventory write-down related to restructuring

On April 19, 2016, the FDA notified the Company that the SurgiBot System did not meet the criteria for substantial equivalence based on the data submitted in the 510(k) submission. As a result, we reprioritized our near-term regulatory efforts to the 510(k) submission for the Senhance System. Consequently, in May 2016, the Company implemented a restructuring plan.  Under this plan, we recorded a $2.6 million write-down of inventory related to the SurgiBot System.


Restructuring and other charges

Under the restructuring plan executed in May 2016, we recorded $3.1 million in restructuring and other charges. The restructuring charges included: (i) $0.5 million to be paid in cash, of which $0.4 million related to employee severance costs and $0.1 million related to cancellation of certain contracts; and (ii) $2.6 million for other non-cash charges, of which $1.0 million related to the write-off of long-lived assets for the abandonment of certain equipment and tooling and $1.6 million related to the write-off of intellectual property for certain patents.

Goodwill impairment

The Company performs an annual impairment test of goodwill at December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our one reporting unit may not be recoverable. During the second quarter of 2016, we were notified by the FDA that the SurgiBot System did not meet the criteria for substantial equivalency, negatively impacting our market capitalization, and warranting an interim two-step quantitative impairment test.  Based on the impairment test, we recorded goodwill impairment of $61.8 million during the second quarter of 2016.  No charge for goodwill impairment was required as of December 31, 2017.

Acquisition Related Costs

Acquisition related costs consist primarily of legal, accounting and other professional fees related to the Senhance Acquisition. We incurred $4.2 million of acquisition-related expensesincome for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liabilities

2022. The change was primarily related to a $1.2 million increase in the fair value of Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants issuedwarrant liabilities recorded in April 2017 was $83.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The2023, a $0.4 million increase was primarily thein interest income and a decrease in interest expense of $0.4 million, partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in other expenses as a result of our increased stock price at the time the warrants were exercised$0.7 million in issuance costs allocated to warrant liability and increased stock price for the remaining outstanding warrants at December 31, 2017.$0.4 million in other expenses.

Interest

Income Tax Expense Net

InterestThe Company recognized $0.3 million income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased to $2.1 million compared to $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The $0.2 million increase was primarily related to the increase in interest rate on refinanced notes payable.2023 and 2022.

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased to $1.9 million compared to $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The $0.3 million increase was primarily related to the increase in notes payable of approximately $10.0 million in August 2015.

Income Tax Benefit

Income tax benefit consists primarily of taxes related to the amortization of purchase accounting intangibles in connection with the Italian taxing jurisdiction for TransEnterix Italia as a result of the acquisition of the Senhance System. We recognized $3.3 million, $5.5 million and $1.0 million of income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources

Going Concern

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using U.S. GAAP applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of Liquidity

Since our inception we have incurred significant lossesassets and asliquidation of December 31, 2017, weliabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $447.6 million. We have$939.4 million and working capital of $23.8 million as of December 31, 2023. The Company has not yet achieved profitabilityestablished sufficient revenues to cover its operating costs and we cannot assure investors that we will achieve profitability with our existingrequire additional capital resources.to continue as a going concern. As of December 31, 2017,2023, the Company'sCompany had cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments, excluding restricted cash, balance wasof approximately $97.6$21.1 million. We believeThe Company believes that our existing cash, and cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments, together with cash received from sales of our products, will be sufficient to fund operations through at least the next 12 months. We expect to continue to fund salesproduct, service, and marketing, research and development and general and administrative expenses at similar to current or higher levels and, as a result, we will need to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability. Our principal sources of cash to date have been proceeds from public offerings of common stock, private placements of common and preferred stock, incurrence of debt and the sale of equity securities held as investments.


We currently have one effective shelf registration statement on file with the SEC, which registers up to $150.0 million of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, or warrants, or any combination thereof for future financing transactions.  The shelf registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on May 19, 2017. We have raised $50.0 million in gross proceeds and approximately $48.5 in net proceeds under such shelf registration statement through the sale of all the shares available under the 2017 ATM Offering. As of December 31, 2017, we had $100.0 million available for future financings under such shelf registration statement.  

At December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents, excluding restricted cash, of approximately $91.2 million.

Consolidated Cash Flow Data

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

(39.8

)

 

$

(52.4

)

 

$

(38.8

)

Investing activities

 

 

(2.0

)

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

(26.2

)

Financing activities

 

 

104.4

 

 

 

49.9

 

 

 

68.4

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and

   cash equivalents

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash

   equivalents and restricted cash

 

$

63.0

 

 

$

(3.9

)

 

$

3.4

 

Operating Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2017, cash used in operating activities of $39.8 million consisted of net loss of $144.8 million offset by cash provided by working capital of $3.4 million and non-cash items of $101.6 million. The non-cash items primarily consisted of $83.7 million change in fair value of warrant liabilities, $7.1 million of stock-based compensation expense, $2.5 million of depreciation, $7.9 million of amortization, and $2.0 million change in fair value of contingent consideration, offset by $3.3 million deferred income tax benefit. The increase in cash from changes in working capital included $2.1 million increase in accrued expenses, $7.5 million increase for cash received for the sale of the SurgiBot assets and $1.1 million increase for deferred revenue, offset by $3.0 million increase in inventories, $0.5 million decrease in accounts payable, $3.3 million increase in other current and long term assets and $0.4 million increase in accounts receivable.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, cash used in operating activities of $52.4 million consisted of net loss of $120.0 million and cash used for working capital of $8.5 million, offset by non-cash items of $76.1 million. The non-cash items primarily consisted of $61.8 million goodwill impairment, $2.6 million inventory write-down related to restructuring, $2.6 million non-cash restructuring and other charges, $5.0 million of stock-based compensation expense, $1.9 million of depreciation, $7.1 million of amortization, and $0.5 million change in fair value of contingent consideration, offset by $5.6 million deferred income tax benefit. The decrease in cash from changes in working capital included $6.6 million increase in inventories, $0.4 million decrease in accounts payable, $1.5 million increase in other current and long term assets and $1.0 million increase in accounts receivable, offset by  $1.1 million increase in accrued expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, cash used in operating activities of $38.8 million consisted of net loss of $46.9 million, offset by non-cash items of $5.5 million and cash provided by working capital of $2.6 million. The non-cash items primarily consisted of $3.3 million of stock-based compensation expense, $1.3 million of depreciation, and $2.3 million of amortization, offset by $1.0 million deferred income tax benefit and $0.4 million change in fair value of contingent consideration. The increase in cash from changes in working capital included $1.9 million increase in inventories and $2.0 million increase in other current and long term assets. These amounts were partially offset by $1.1 million increase in accounts payable, $5.4 million increase in accrued expenses and $0.1 million decrease in accounts receivable.

Investing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in investing activities was $2.0 million. This amount reflected the purchases of property and equipment and intellectual property.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash used in investing activities was $1.4 million. This amount reflected the purchases of property and equipment.


For the year ended December 31, 2015, net cash used in investing activities was $26.2 million. This amount reflected the $25.0 million payment for the Senhance Acquisition and $1.2 million paid for the purchases of property and equipment.

Financing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash provided by financing activities was $104.4 million. This amount was primarily related to $77.6 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock and warrants, net of issuance costs, $13.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of debt and $34.5 million proceeds from the exercise of warrants, partially offset by $13.3 million in payments of debt and $7.2 million in payments of contingent consideration.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by financing activities was $49.9 million. This amount was primarily related to $58.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs, partially offset by $6.9 million in payments of debt and $1.2 million in payments of contingent consideration.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, net cash provided by financing activities was $68.4 million. This amount was primarily related $58.3 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs, and $9.9 million proceeds from the issuance of debt, and $0.2 million proceeds from the issuance of stock options and warrants.

Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with cash received fromlease sales of our products, will be sufficient to meet ourits anticipated cash needs through at least the next 12 months. We intend to spend substantial amounts on commercial activities, on research and development activities, including product development, regulatory and compliance, clinical studies in support of our future product offerings, the enhancement and protection of our intellectual property, on notes payable payments as they come due, and on contingent consideration payments in connection with the acquisition of the Senhance System. Weinto early June 2024.

The Company will need to obtain additional financing to pursue ourproceed with its business strategy,plan. Management's plan to respond to new competitive pressuresobtain additional resources for the Company may include additional sales of equity, traditional financing, such as loans, entry into a strategic collaboration, entry into an out-licensing arrangement or to take advantageprovision of opportunities that may arise. To meet our capital needs, we are considering multiple alternatives, including, but not limited to, additional equity financings, debt financings, strategic collaborations and other funding transactions. There can be nodistribution rights in some or all of its markets. However, management cannot provide any assurance that wethe Company will be able to completesuccessful in accomplishing any such transactionor all of its plans. If sufficient funds are not received on acceptable terms or otherwise. If we are unable to obtaina timely basis, the necessary capital, we willCompany would then need to pursuepurse a plan to license or sell ourits assets, seek to be acquired by another entity, cease operations and/or seek bankruptcy protection. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date that these financial statements are issued. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.

The Company is subject to risks similar to other similarly sized companies in the medical device industry. These risks include, without limitation: the historical lack of profitability; the Company’s ability to raise additional capital, the success of the Company’s LUNA System development plans and its ability to fund such plans, the Company’s ability to grow its placements and increase utilization of the Senhance System by customers; its ability to successfully develop, clinically test, obtain regulatory clearance for and commercialize its products and products in development; negative impacts on the Company's operations caused by the hostilities in the Middle East and other geopolitical factors; the success of its market development efforts; the timing and outcome of the regulatory review process for its products; changes in the healthcare regulatory environments of the United States, the European Union, Japan, Taiwan and other countries in which the Company operates or intends to operate; its ability to attract and retain key management, marketing and scientific personnel; its ability to successfully prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, defend and enforce patent claims and other intellectual property rights; its ability to successfully transition from a research and development company to a marketing, sales and distribution company; competition in the market for robotic and digital surgical devices; and its ability to identify and pursue development of additional products.

Sources of Liquidity

Our principal sources of liquidity to date have been cash proceeds from issuance of common stock pursuant to public offerings, incurrence of debt and proceeds from sales and maturities of investments.

Consolidated Cash Flow Data

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2023

  

2022

 
  (in millions) 

Net cash (used in) provided by

        

Operating activities

 $(63.6) $(58.9)

Investing activities

  64.5   47.5 

Financing activities

  9.6   (0.3)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  0.8   (0.1)

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 $11.3  $(11.8)

Operating Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2023, cash used in operating activities of $63.6 million consisted of a net loss of $78.4 million, offset by changes in non-cash items of $11.7 million, and operating assets and liabilities of $3.1 million. The non-cash items primarily consisted of $7.9 million of stock-based compensation expense, $3.3 million of depreciation, $1.0 change in fair value of contingent consideration, $0.4 million of amortization of intangible assets, $0.4 million of property and equipment impairment, $0.3 million change in inventory reserves, and $0.1 million deferred tax expense partially offset by $1.2 million change in fair value of warrant liabilities and $0.5 million in accretion of discounts and premiums on investments. The increase in cash from changes in operating assets and liabilities primarily relates to a $1.2 million decrease in other current and long-term assets, $0.9 million increase in accrued employee compensation and benefits, $0.6 million increase in accounts payable, $0.6 million decrease in employee retention tax credit receivable, $0.4 million decrease in prepaid expenses, $0.4 million increase in accrued expenses, $0.2 million increase in deferred revenue, $0.1 million decrease in inventory net of transfers to property and equipment and $0.1 million decrease in operating lease liabilities, partially offset by $1.2 million increase in accounts receivable and $0.2 million increase in operating lease right-of-use assets.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, cash used in operating activities of $58.9 million consisted of a net loss of $75.6 million, changes in operating assets and liabilities of $4.7 million, offset by non-cash items of $21.4 million. The non-cash items primarily consisted of $8.4 million of stock-based compensation expense, $7.7 million of amortization of intangible assets, $3.4 million of depreciation, $1.4 million of property and equipment impairment, $0.6 million change in inventory reserves, $0.6 million net amortization of discounts and premiums on investments, $0.3 million deferred tax expense, and $0.1 million loss on disposal of property and equipment, offset by $1.1 million of change in fair value of contingent consideration. The decrease in cash from changes in operating assets and liabilities primarily relates to a $3.9 million decrease in accrued expenses, $2.3 million increase in inventory net of transfers to property and equipment, $2.1 million increase in other current and long-term assets, $1.5 million increase in accounts receivable and $0.4 million increase in prepaid expenses, offset by $4.5 million increase in accrued employee compensation and benefits, $0.8 million decrease in employee retention tax credit receivable, and $0.2 million decrease in operating lease right-of-use assets.

Investing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash provided by investing activities was $64.5 million. This amount consists of $77.3 million of proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale investments, offset by $12.3 million of purchases of available-for-sale investments and $0.5 million purchases of property and equipment.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash provided by investing activities was $47.5 million. This amount consists of $82.7 million of proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale investments, offset by $33.9 million of purchases of available-for-sale investments and $1.3 million purchases of property and equipment.

Financing Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $9.6 million, primarily related to proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants of $10.1 million, offset by $0.5 million taxes paid for the net share settlement of vesting of restricted stock units.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash used in financing activities was $0.3 million, primarily related to taxes paid for the net share settlement of vesting of restricted stock units.

Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements

The Company intends to spend substantial amounts on research and development activities, including product development, regulatory and compliance, and clinical studies in support of the development of the LUNA System and its digital solutions platform. The Company intends to use financing opportunities strategically to continue to strengthen its financial position as it looks to extend its available cash for operations.

Cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries totaled $1.8$4.9 million atas of December 31, 2017,2023, including restricted cash. We doThe Company does not intend or currently foresee a need to repatriate cash and cash equivalents held by ourits foreign subsidiary.subsidiaries. If these funds are needed in the U.S., we believeUnited States, the Company believes that the potential U.S. tax impact to repatriate these funds would be immaterial.

Innovatus Loan Agreement

On May 10, 2017, the Company and its domestic subsidiaries, as co-borrowers, entered into the Innovatus Loan Agreement with Innovatus Life Sciences Lending Fund I, LP, as Lender and Collateral Agent.  Please see the description of the Innovatus Loan Agreement above in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations‑Debt Refinancing.  

SVB Loan Agreement

In connection with its entrance into the Innovatus Loan Agreement on May 10, 2017, the Company repaid its existing credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank and Oxford Finance LLC, or the Prior Lenders, under the SVB Loan Agreement, , initially entered into in January 2012, as subsequently amended or amended and restated, or, collectively, the SVB Loan Agreement. A number of the amendments related to the Senhance Acquisition or the growth of our business in non-U.S. jurisdictions. Under the SVB Loan Agreement, our current borrowing capacity was $20.0 million, all of which was borrowed under term loans. We had periods of interest-only payments during the SVB Loan Agreement, and had been making principal payments since January 2016. The maturity date of the term loans was July 1, 2018.

In connection with the entry into the Innovatus Loan Agreement, we were obligated to pay final payment and facility fees under the SVB Loan Agreement. The final payment fee obligation was $1.3 million.


Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017 (in millions):

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Less than

1 year

 

 

1 to 3 years

 

 

3 to 5 years

 

 

Thereafter

 

Long-term debt obligations (1)

 

$

16.5

 

 

$

5.5

 

 

$

11.0

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Operating leases

 

$

2.2

 

 

$

0.9

 

 

$

1.0

 

 

$

0.3

 

 

$

 

License and supply agreements

 

$

9.6

 

 

$

3.6

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

1.2

 

 

$

3.0

 

Total contractual obligations (2)

 

$

28.3

 

 

$

10.0

 

 

$

13.8

 

 

$

1.5

 

 

$

3.0

 

(1)

Long-term debt obligations include principal and interest payments on our notes payable.

(2)

As of December 31, 2017, the contingent consideration that may be paid under the Purchase Agreement with Sofar upon the achievement of milestones is approximately €15.7 million. Due to uncertainty regarding the timing and amount of future payments related to these liabilities, these amounts are excluded from the contractual obligations table above.

Long-term debt obligations include future payments under the Innovatus Loan Agreement.

Operating lease amounts include future minimum lease payments under all our non-cancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year. We rent office space in North Carolina under an operating lease which expires in 2018, with options to extend the lease through 2021. We also rent space for a warehouse facility in North Carolina which expired in January 2018. In Italy, we rent space for research and development and demonstration facilities under an operating lease which expires in 2022. This table does not include obligations for any lease extensions.

License, supply and third party vendor agreements include agreements assumed as part of the Senhance Acquisition and other third party vendor agreements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2017, we2023, the Company did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of ourthe Company’s financial condition and results of operations set forth above under the headings “Results of Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should be read in conjunction with ourthe Company’s consolidated, audited financial statements and notes thereto appearing in Item 8 of this Annual Report. The preparation of these consolidated, audited financial statements requires usthe Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate ourthe Company evaluates its critical accounting policies and estimates, including identifiable intangible assets, and goodwill, in-process research and development, contingent consideration, warrant liabilities, stock-based compensation, inventory, revenue recognition and revenue recognition. We base ourincome taxes. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. A more detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies can be found in Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 which are included asin Item 8 of this Annual Report. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

While all accounting policies impact the consolidated financial statements, certain policies may be viewed as critical. Critical accounting policiesestimates are those that are both most important to the portrayal of financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s most subjective or complex judgments and estimates. Our management believes the policies that fall within this category are the policies on accounting for identifiable intangible assets, and goodwill, in-process research and development, contingent consideration, warrants liabilities, stock-based compensation, inventory, revenue recognition and revenue recognition.income taxes.

Identifiable Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Identifiable intangible assets consist of purchased patent rights recorded at cost and developed technology acquired as part of a business acquisition recorded at estimated fair value. Intangible assets are amortized over 5 to 10 years. We periodically evaluate identifiable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. 


Indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as goodwill, are not amortized. We test the carrying amounts of goodwill for recoverability on an annual basis or when events or changes in circumstances indicate evidence of potential impairment exists by performing either a qualitative evaluation or a two-step quantitative test. The qualitative evaluation is an assessment of factors, including industry, market and general economic conditions, market value, and future projections to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than it’s carrying amount, including goodwill. Prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-14, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), as of the beginning of fiscal year 2017, in certain instances, we elected to bypass this qualitative assessment and perform a two-step quantitative test. The quantitative goodwill impairment test was performed using a two-step approach. In the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit was determined and compared to the reporting unit's carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test was performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. In the second step, the fair value of the reporting unit was allocated to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination and the purchase price was equivalent to the fair value of the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities was referred to as the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill was then compared to the actual carrying value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill was less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss was recognized for the difference. ASU 2017-04 removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test.

During the second quarter of 2016, the FDA notified the Company that the SurgiBot System did not meet the criteria for substantial equivalency, negatively impacting the Company’s market capitalization, and warranting an interim two-step quantitative impairment test.  We determined the fair value of our reporting unit using a discounted cash flow analysis derived from our long-term plans.  The fair value of the reporting unit was corroborated using market prices for TransEnterix, Inc.  The inputs used to determine the fair values were classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Based on the impairment test, we recorded goodwill impairment of $61.8 million during the second quarter of 2016.  We performed a qualitative assessment during the annual impairment review for fiscal 2016 as of December 31, 2016 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of our single reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. Therefore, the two-step goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit was not necessary as of December 31, 2016.

During the second quarter of 2017, our stock price experienced a significant decline and as of June 30, 2017 we performed a Step 1 goodwill impairment test as of the second quarter.  Our analysis included utilizing our market capitalization with a control premium. To determine the appropriate control premium, we considered recent merger and acquisition transaction activity of comparable public healthcare equipment companies.  Based on this analysis, we determined a control premium range of approximately 19% to 46%, and selected the mid-range of approximately 32.5%.  After applying a 32.5% control premium, our market value exceeded our carrying value by 13%. Based on this analysis, we determined that no charge to goodwill for impairment was required during the second quarter of 2017. As of December 31, 2017, we elected to bypass the qualitative assessment and calculated the fair value of our reporting unit, which exceeded the carrying amount. Accordingly, no charge for goodwill impairment was required as of December 31, 2017.

A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of goodwill impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include, among others: a significant decline in expected future cash flows; a sustained, significant decline in the Company's stock price and market capitalization; a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate; adverse assessment or action by a regulator; and unanticipated competition. Key assumptions used in the annual goodwill impairment test are highly judgmental and include: selection of comparable companies and amount of control premium. Any change in these indicators or key assumptions could have a significant negative impact on the Company's financial condition, impact the goodwill impairment analysis or cause the Company to perform a goodwill impairment analysis more frequently than once per year.

In-Process Research and Development

In-process research and development, or IPR&D, assets are considered to be indefinite-lived until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development projects. IPR&D assets represent the fair value assigned to technologies that we acquire, which at the time of acquisition have not reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use. During the period that the assets are considered indefinite-lived, they are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if we become aware of any events occurring or changes in circumstances that indicate that the fair value of the IPR&D assets are less than their carrying amounts. If and when development is complete, which generally occurs when we have regulatory approval and are able to commercialize products associated with the IPR&D assets, these assets are then deemed definite-lived and are amortized based on their estimated useful lives at that point in time. If development is terminated or abandoned, we may have a full or partial impairment charge related to the IPR&D assets, calculated as the excess of carrying value of the IPR&D assets over fair value.


Contingent Consideration

Contingent consideration is recorded as a liability and measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow model utilizing significant unobservable inputs including the probability of achieving each of the potential milestones and an estimated discount rate associated with the risks of the expected cash flows attributable to the various milestones. Significant increases or decreases in any of the probabilities of success or changes in expected timelines for achievement of any of these milestones would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value of these milestones, respectively, and commensurate changes to the associated liability. The fair value of the contingent consideration at each reporting date will be updated by reflecting the changes in fair value in our statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Warrant Liabilities

For the Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants, the warrants are recorded as liabilities and are revalued at each reporting period. The change in fair value is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The selection of the appropriate valuation model and the inputs and assumptions that are required to determine the valuation requires significant judgment and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of the related liability and reported amounts of the change in fair value. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and changes in these estimates are recorded when known. As the warrant liability is required to be measured at fair value at each reporting date, it is reasonably possible that these estimates and assumptions could change in the near term. 

Stock-Based Compensation

We

The Company recognize as expense, the grant-date fair value of stock options and other stock basedstock-based compensation issued to employees and non-employee directors over the requisite service periods, which are typically the vesting periods. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton model to estimate the fair value of our stock-based payments. The volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes-Merton model is based on the calculated historical volatility based on an analysis of reported data for a peer group of companies as well as the Company’s historical volatility. The expected term of options granted by us has been determined based upon the simplified method, because we do not have sufficient historical information regarding our options to derive the expected term. Under this approach, the expected term is the mid-point between the weighted average of vesting period and the contractual term. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury rates whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. We haveThe Company has not paid and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our shares of common stock; therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero. WeThe Company estimate forfeitures based on our historical experience and adjust the estimated forfeiture rate based upon actual experience. We adopted ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting as of the beginning of fiscal year 2017 and did not elect to account for forfeitures when they occur, but will continue to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Inventory

Inventories

Inventory, which includes material, labor and overhead costs, is stated at the lower of cost, determined on a first-in, first-out basis, or net realizable value. We recordThe Company records reserves, when necessary, to reduce the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value. At the point of loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established, and any subsequent improvements in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.

Any inventory on hand at the measurement date in excess of the Company's current requirements based on anticipated levels of sales is classified as long-term on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The Company's classification of long-term inventory requires us to estimate the portion of on-hand inventory that can be realized over the upcoming twelve months.

Revenue Recognition

Our

The Company’s revenue consists of product revenue resulting from the salessale of systems,Senhance Systems, Senhance System components, and instruments and accessories. Service revenue consists of revenue related to Senhance System service agreements. Lease revenue consists of revenue generated from utilizing the Senhance System, instruments and accessories, and service revenue. We recognize revenueservicing of the Senhance System under operating lease agreements. The Company accounts for a contract with a customer when persuasive evidencethere is a legally enforceable contract between the Company and the customer, the rights of an arrangement exists, deliverythe parties are identified, the contract has occurred or service has been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable,commercial substance, and collectability of the contract consideration is reasonably assured. Revenue is presentedprobable. The Company's revenues are measured based on consideration specified in the contract with each customer, net of any sales incentives and taxes collected from customers that are remitted to government authorities. WeThe Company’s Senhance System sale arrangements could include a five-year service period; the first year of service is generally recognize revenuefree and included in the Senhance System sale arrangement with an option to purchase the remaining four years at a stated service price.

The Company’s Senhance System sale arrangements generally contain multiple products and services. For these consolidated sale arrangements, the Company accounts for individual products and services as separate performance obligations if they are distinct, which is if a product or service is separately identifiable from other items in the consolidated package, and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer. The Company’s Senhance System sale arrangements may include a combination of the following points in time:

System sales.  For systems sold directly to end customers, revenue is recognized when acceptance occurs, which is deemed to have occurred upon customer acknowledgment of delivery or installation, depending on the terms of the arrangement. The Senhance Systems are delivered with a software component. However, because the software and non-software elements function together to deliver the system’s essential functionality, our arrangements are excluded from being accounted for under software revenue recognition guidance.

Instruments and accessories. Revenue from sales of instruments and accessories is generally recognized at the time of shipment.  Revenue from services related to the supply and management of instruments and accessories is recognized as the services are rendered.

Service.  Service revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the service period. Revenue related to services performed on a time-and-materials basis is recognized when it is earned and billable.


Ourperformance obligations: system(s), system sale arrangements contain multiple elements including a system(s),components, instruments, accessories, and system service. We generally deliver all of the elements, other than service, within days of entering into the system sale arrangement. Each of these elements is a separate unit of accounting. System instruments, accessories and service are also sold on a stand-alone basis.services.

For multiple-element arrangements that contain multiple performance obligations, revenue is allocated to each unit of accountingperformance obligation based on theirits relative estimated standalone selling prices. Relativeprice. When available, standalone selling prices are based first on vendor specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), then on third-party evidence ofobservable prices at which the Company separately sells the products or services; however due to limited sales to date, standalone selling prices may not be directly observable. The Company estimates the standalone selling price (“TPE”) when VSOE does not exist,using the market assessment approach considering market conditions and then on management's best estimate of the selling price (“BESP”) when VSOE and TPE do not exist.

Our system sale arrangements generally include a one-year period of free service, and the right for the customer to purchase service annually thereafter. The revenue allocated to the free service period is deferred and recognized ratably over the free service period. Deferred revenue was primarily comprised of deferred revenue related to service contracts for the periods presented.

Because we have neither VSOE nor TPE for our systems, the allocation of revenue is based on BESP for the systems sold. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale, had the product been sold on a stand-alone basis. We determine BESP for our systems by considering multipleentity-specific factors including, but not limited to, features and functionality of the system,products and services, geographies, type of customer, and market conditions. WeThe Company regularly review BESPreviews estimated standalone selling prices and maintain internal controlsupdates these estimates if necessary.

The Company recognizes revenues when or as the performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of the product or service to a customer. The Company generally recognizes revenue for the performance obligations as follows: 

System sales. For Senhance Systems and Senhance System components sold directly to end customers (including those arising from System purchases under lease rights to purchase), revenue is recognized when the Company transfers control to the customer, which is generally at the point when acceptance occurs that indicates customer acknowledgment of delivery or installation, depending on the terms of the arrangement. For lease buyouts, where the customer has already acknowledged installation of the system, transfer of control occurs when we receive an executed contract for the lease buyout of the Senhance System. For Senhance Systems sold through distributors, for which distributors are responsible for installation, revenue is recognized generally upon delivery. The Company’s Senhance System arrangements generally do not provide a right of return. The Senhance Systems are generally covered by a one-year warranty. Warranty costs were not material for the periods presented.

Instruments and accessories. Revenue from sales of instruments and accessories is recognized when control is transferred to the customers, which generally occurs at the time of shipment, but also occurs at the time of delivery depending on the customer arrangement.

Service. Service revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the service period as the customers benefit from the service throughout the service period. Revenue related to services performed on a time-and-materials basis is recognized when performed.

The Company enters into lease arrangements for our Senhance Systems with certain qualified customers. Revenue related to arrangements including lease elements are allocated to lease and non-lease elements based on their relative standalone selling prices. Lease elements generally include a Senhance System, while non-lease elements generally include instruments, accessories, and services. For some lease arrangements, the customers are provided with the right to purchase the leased Senhance at some point during and/or at the end of the lease term. In some arrangements lease payments are based on the usage of the Senhance System. In determining whether a transaction should be classified as a sales-type, operating, or direct financing lease, we consider the following terms at lease commencement: (1) whether title of the Senhance System transfers automatically or for a nominal fee by the end of the lease term, (2) whether the present value of the minimum lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the leased Senhance System, (3) whether the lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the leased Senhance System, (4) whether the lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the leased Senhance System that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, and (5) whether the underlying Senhance System is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the Company at the end of the lease term. All such arrangements through December 31, 2023, are classified as operating leases. Revenue related to lease elements from operating lease arrangements is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over establishingthe lease term or based upon Senhance System usage and updating these estimates.is presented as lease revenue. 

The Company invoices our customers based on the billing schedules in its sales arrangements. Contract assets for the periods presented primarily represent the difference between the revenue that was recognized based on the relative selling price of the related performance obligations and the contractual billing terms in the arrangements. Deferred revenue for the periods presented was primarily related to service obligations, for which the service fees are billed up-front, generally annually. The associated deferred revenue is generally recognized ratably over the service period.

In connection with assets recognized from the costs to obtain a contract with a customer, the Company has determined that sales incentive programs for our sales team do not meet the requirements to be capitalized as we do not expect to generate future economic benefits from the related revenue from the initial sales transaction.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets or liabilities for the temporary differences between financial reporting and tax basis of our assets and liabilities, and for tax carryforwards at enacted statutory rates in effect for the years in which the asset or liability is expected to be realized. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income during the period that includes the enactment date. Determination of the realizability of deferred tax assets requires management’s judgment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets and liabilities to the estimated amounts expected to be realized. 

U.S. shareholders are subject to tax on global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740, No. 5, Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that an entity can make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary basis differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or to provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred as a period expense only. The Company has elected to account for GILTI in the year the tax is incurred. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, no GILTI tax has been recorded.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See “Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements including the respective expected dates of adoption and effects on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

 

ITEM 7.A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

GeneralITEM7.A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We have limited exposureare exposed to market risks from instruments that may impact the Balance Sheets, Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, and Statements of Cash Flows. Such exposure is due primarily to changing interest rates andchanges in foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rates

The primary objective Operations outside of the United States accounted for our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. This is accomplished by investing excess cash in money market funds92% and Treasury securities. As89% of revenue for years ended December 31, 2017, approximately 100% of2023 and 2022, respectively, and are concentrated principally in Europe. We translate the investment portfolio was in cash equivalents with very short term maturitiesrevenue and therefore not subject to any significant interest rate fluctuations.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We conduct operations in several different countries, including the U.S. and throughout Europe, and portionsexpenses of our revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. dollars, Euros or other currencies. Since our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, we must translate revenues, income and expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, into U.S. dollars atforeign operations using average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The effect of a 10% change in effect during or at the end of each reporting period. We have not historically hedged our exposure toaverage foreign currency fluctuations.  Accordingly, increases or decreases in the value ofexchange rates among the U.S. dollar againstversus the Euro and other currencies could materially affect our net operating revenues, operating income and the value of balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies.

Duringfor the year ended December 31, 2017, 82%2023, would result in revenue changing by $0.8 million. This change would not be material to our cash flows and our results of our revenue and approximately 39% of our expenses were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, most notably the Euro. Based on actual results over the past year, a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in the U.S. dollar against the Euro would have increased or decreased revenue by approximately $0.6 million and operating expenses by approximately $2.4 million.operations.

 


47

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

ITEM8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

Page

ReportsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(BDO USA, LLP; Raleigh, NC; PCAOB ID #243)

4149

Consolidated Financial Statements :Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172023 and 20162022

4351

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20172023 and 2022

4452

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20172023 and 2022

4553

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20172023 and 2022

4654

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

55

47

 


Report of Independent RegisteredRegistered Public Accounting Firm

Stockholders

Shareholders and Board of Directors

TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc.

Morrisville,Durham, North Carolina

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We

Going Concern Uncertainty

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has not generated positive cash flows from operations which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also have audited,described in accordance withNote 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the standardsoutcome of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and our report dated March 8, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOBPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Valuation of Senhance Surgical System Inventories

As indicated in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Management considers historical activity and forecast demand in relation to the inventories on hand, competitiveness of product offerings, and product life cycles when estimating net realizable value. As indicated in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded $11.2 million of inventories as of December 31, 2023, including $9.2 million of finished goods.

We identified management’s estimation of the net realizable value of Senhance Surgical Systems included in finished goods inventories as a critical audit matter. The Company’s limited sales history and development plans for new systems require management to make significant judgments and assumptions with respect to future demand and product life cycles for the Company’s Senhance Surgical Systems that affect the estimation of the net realizable value of Senhance Surgical System inventories. Auditing these elements involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit effort required to address these matters.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s forecasted demand for Senhance Surgical Systems based on the results of historical sales and leasing efforts, expectations with respect to future sales and lease placements, and expectations with respect to Sehance product life cycles.

Testing management’s estimation of the net realizable value of completed Senhance Surgical Systems, included in finished goods inventories, by comparing the cost of finished Senhance Systems to recent system sales.

/s/ BDO USA, LLPP.C.

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2013.

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 8, 2018


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Stockholders and Board of Directors

TransEnterix, Inc.

Morrisville, North Carolina

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited TransEnterix, Inc.’s (the “Company’s”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and our report dated March 8, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 8, 2018

21, 2024

 

TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share amounts)

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

91,217

 

 

$

24,165

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

1,536

 

 

 

621

 

Inventories

 

 

10,817

 

 

 

7,883

 

Interest receivable

 

 

80

 

 

 

12

 

Other current assets

 

 

9,344

 

 

 

5,335

 

Total Current Assets

 

 

112,994

 

 

 

38,016

 

Restricted cash

 

 

6,389

 

 

 

10,425

 

Accounts receivable, net of current portion

 

 

 

 

 

266

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

6,670

 

 

 

5,772

 

Intellectual property, net

 

 

52,638

 

 

 

37,090

 

In-process research and development

 

 

 

 

 

15,920

 

Goodwill

 

 

71,368

 

 

 

68,697

 

Other long term assets

 

 

192

 

 

 

63

 

Total Assets

 

$

250,251

 

 

$

176,249

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

3,771

 

 

$

3,984

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

10,974

 

 

 

8,206

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

1,088

 

 

 

 

Deferred gain on sale of SurgiBot assets

 

 

7,500

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration – current portion

 

 

719

 

 

 

10,502

 

Notes payable - current portion, net of debt discount

 

 

4,788

 

 

 

7,997

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

 

28,840

 

 

 

30,689

 

Long Term Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration – less current portion

 

 

11,699

 

 

 

12,298

 

Notes payable - less current portion, net of debt discount

 

 

8,385

 

 

 

4,995

 

Warrant liabilities

 

 

14,090

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

 

8,389

 

 

 

10,397

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

71,403

 

 

 

58,379

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock $0.001 par value, 750,000,000 shares authorized at December 31,

   2017 and 2016, respectively; 199,282,003 and 115,781,030 shares issued at

   December 31, 2017 and  2016, respectively; and 199,282,003 and 115,687,351

   shares outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively

 

 

199

 

 

 

115

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

621,261

 

 

 

426,609

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(447,640

)

 

 

(302,844

)

Treasury stock at cost, 0 and 93,679 shares at December 31, 2017 and 2016,

   respectively

 

 

 

 

 

(241

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

5,028

 

 

 

(5,769

)

Total Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

178,848

 

 

 

117,870

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

$

250,251

 

 

$

176,249

 

  

December 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 

Assets

        

Current Assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

 $17,096  $6,329 

Short-term investments, available-for-sale

  3,971   64,195 

Accounts receivable, net

  3,508   2,256 

Inventories

  7,172   8,284 

Prepaid expenses

  3,143   3,584 

Employee retention tax credit receivable

  -   554 

Other current assets

  1,496   1,671 

Total Current Assets

  36,386   86,873 
         

Restricted cash

  1,642   1,141 

Long-term investments, available-for-sale

  -   3,865 

Inventories, net of current portion

  4,043   5,469 

Property and equipment, net

  8,959   9,542 

Intellectual property, net

  1,237   1,576 

Net deferred tax assets

  44   174 

Operating lease right-of-use assets, net

  5,165   4,950 

Other long-term assets

  1,610   2,463 

Total Assets

 $59,086  $116,053 
         

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

        

Current Liabilities:

        

Accounts payable

 $4,145  $3,348 

Accrued employee compensation and benefits

  5,390   4,508 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  1,636   1,293 

Operating lease liabilities - current portion

  1,036   800 

Deferred revenue

  421   465 

Total Current Liabilities

  12,628   10,414 
         

Long-Term Liabilities:

        

Deferred revenue - less current portion

  290   - 

Contingent consideration

  2,220   1,256 

Warrant liabilities

  5,888   - 

Noncurrent operating lease liabilities

  4,646   4,738 

Total Liabilities

  25,672   16,408 
         

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 16)

        
         

Stockholders' Equity:

        

Common stock $0.001 par value, 750,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022; 264,921,526 and 236,895,440 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively

  265   237 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022

  -   - 

Additional paid-in capital

  973,129   962,731 

Accumulated deficit

  (939,368)  (860,935)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (612)  (2,388)

Total Stockholders' Equity

  33,414   99,645 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

 $59,086  $116,053 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(in thousands except per share amounts)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Revenue

 

$

7,111

 

 

$

1,519

 

 

$

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

6,727

 

 

 

1,069

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

384

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

 

Operating Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

21,989

 

 

 

29,273

 

 

 

29,669

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

17,536

 

 

 

9,151

 

 

 

2,855

 

General and administrative

 

 

12,275

 

 

 

10,813

 

 

 

7,831

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

7,858

 

 

 

6,967

 

 

 

2,185

 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

 

 

2,026

 

 

 

482

 

 

 

(400

)

Issuance costs for warrants

 

 

627

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory write-down related to restructuring

 

 

 

 

 

2,565

 

 

 

 

Restructuring and other charges

 

 

 

 

 

3,064

 

 

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

 

 

61,784

 

 

 

 

Acquisition related costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,231

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

 

62,311

 

 

 

124,099

 

 

 

46,371

 

Operating Loss

 

 

(61,927

)

 

 

(123,649

)

 

 

(46,371

)

Other Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of warrant liabilities

 

 

(83,734

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

(2,135

)

 

 

(1,889

)

 

 

(1,601

)

Other (expense) income

 

 

(300

)

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

Total Other Expense, net

 

 

(86,169

)

 

 

(1,854

)

 

 

(1,601

)

Loss before income taxes

 

$

(148,096

)

 

$

(125,503

)

 

$

(47,972

)

Income tax benefit

 

 

3,300

 

 

 

5,523

 

 

 

1,024

 

Net loss

 

$

(144,796

)

 

$

(119,980

)

 

$

(46,948

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation gain (loss)

 

 

10,797

 

 

 

(2,603

)

 

 

(3,166

)

Comprehensive loss

 

$

(133,999

)

 

$

(122,583

)

 

$

(50,114

)

Net loss per share - basic and diluted

 

$

(0.97

)

 

$

(1.07

)

 

$

(0.59

)

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted

 

 

148,744

 

 

 

112,185

 

 

 

79,628

 

  

Years Ended

 
  

December 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

Revenue:

        

Product

 $5,519  $4,327 

Service

  1,052   1,373 

Lease

  2,006   1,387 

Total revenue

  8,577   7,087 
         

Cost of revenue:

        

Product

  6,866   5,303 

Service

  2,293   2,174 

Lease

  3,996   3,395 

Total cost of revenue

  13,155   10,872 

Gross loss

  (4,578)  (3,785)
         

Operating expenses:

        

Research and development

  37,023   28,942 

Sales and marketing

  16,921   14,756 

General and administrative

  19,155   20,172 

Amortization of intangible assets

  453   7,708 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

  964   (1,115)

Impairment of property and equipment

  374   1,431 

Total operating expenses

  74,890   71,894 

Operating loss

  (79,468)  (75,679)
         

Other income (expense), net

        

Change in fair value of warrant liabilities

  1,232   - 

Interest income

  1,553   1,141 

Interest expense

  -   (410)

Other expense, net

  (1,436)  (295)

Total other income (expense), net

  1,349   436 
         

Loss before income taxes

  (78,119)  (75,243)

Income tax expense

  (314)  (318)

Net loss

  (78,433)  (75,561)
         

Net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders - basic and diluted

 $(0.31) $(0.32)

Weighted average number of shares used in computing net loss per common share - basic and diluted

  249,685   236,492 
         

Comprehensive loss:

        

Net loss

  (78,433)  (75,561)

Foreign currency translation gain (loss)

  1,280   (1,867)

Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments

  496   (257)

Comprehensive loss

 $(76,657) $(77,685)

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’Changes in Stockholders Equity

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

Additional

Paid-in

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

 

 

Total

Stockholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Loss

 

 

Equity

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

 

63,183

 

 

$

63

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

257,642

 

 

$

(135,916

)

 

$

 

 

$

121,789

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,311

 

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

 

 

20,756

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,331

 

Issuance of common stock, acquisition

 

 

15,543

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,662

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43,677

 

Exercise of stock options and restricted stock units

 

 

698

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

259

 

Return of common stock to pay withholding taxes

   on restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(31

)

 

 

(73

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(73

)

Issuance of warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,166

)

 

 

(3,166

)

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(46,948

)

 

 

 

 

 

(46,948

)

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

 

100,180

 

 

$

100

 

 

 

(31

)

 

$

(73

)

 

$

363,280

 

 

$

(182,864

)

 

$

(3,166

)

 

$

177,277

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,033

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,033

 

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

 

 

15,086

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,029

 

Exercise of stock options and restricted stock units

 

 

419

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

166

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

166

 

Return of common stock to pay withholding taxes

   on restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(63

)

 

 

(168

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(168

)

Issuance of common stock for services

 

 

96

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

116

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,603

)

 

 

(2,603

)

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(119,980

)

 

 

 

 

 

(119,980

)

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

 

115,781

 

 

$

115

 

 

 

(94

)

 

$

(241

)

 

$

426,609

 

 

$

(302,844

)

 

$

(5,769

)

 

$

117,870

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,078

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,078

 

Non-employee warrant awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

838

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

838

 

Issuance of common stock and treasury stock, net of

   issuance costs

 

 

44,689

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

213

 

 

 

409

 

 

 

68,410

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68,864

 

Exercise of stock options and warrants

 

 

34,749

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

112,803

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

112,838

 

Award of  restricted stock units

 

 

340

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return of common stock to pay withholding taxes on

   restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(119

)

 

 

(168

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(168

)

Issuance of common stock in exchange for contingent

   consideration

 

 

3,723

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,223

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,227

 

Relative fair value of warrants issued with debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,797

 

 

 

10,797

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(144,796

)

 

 

 

 

 

(144,796

)

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

 

199,282

 

 

$

199

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

621,261

 

 

$

(447,640

)

 

$

5,028

 

 

$

178,848

 

  

Common Stock

  

Treasury Stock

                 
  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Additional Paid-in

Capital

  

Accumulated Deficit

  

Accumulated Other Comprehensive

Loss

  

Total Stockholders'

Equity

 

Balance, December 31, 2021

  235,219  $235   -  $-  $954,649  $(785,374) $(264) $169,246 

Stock-based compensation

  -   -   -   -   8,416   -   -   8,416 

Exercise of stock options

  43   -   -   -   18   -   -   18 

Issuance of common stock related to vesting of restricted stock units

  1,633   2   -   -   -   -   -   2 

Shares withheld related to net share settlement of equity awards

  -   -   443   -   (352)  -   -   (352)

Cancellation of treasury stock

  -   -   (443)  -   -   -   -   - 

Other comprehensive loss

  -   -   -   -   -   -   (2,124)  (2,124)

Net loss

  -   -   -   -   -   (75,561)  -   (75,561)

Balance, December 31, 2022

  236,895  $237   -  $-  $962,731  $(860,935) $(2,388) $99,645 

Stock-based compensation

  -   -   -   -   7,918   -   -   7,918 

Exercise of stock options

  13   -   -   -   5   -   -   5 

Issuance of common stock related to vesting of restricted stock units

  3,270   2   -   -   -   -   -   2 

Shares withheld related to net share settlement of equity awards

  -   -   657   1   (497)  -   -   (496)

Cancellation of treasury stock

  -   -   (657)  (1)  -   -   -   (1)

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

  24,744   26   -   -   2,972   -   -   2,998 

Other comprehensive income

  -   -   -   -   -   -   1,776   1,776 

Net loss

  -   -   -   -   -   (78,433)  -   (78,433)

Balance, December 31, 2023

  264,922  $265   -  $-  $973,129  $(939,368) $(612) $33,414 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(144,796

)

 

$

(119,980

)

 

$

(46,948

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash and cash equivalents used in

   operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

2,486

 

 

 

1,942

 

 

 

1,248

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

7,858

 

 

 

6,967

 

 

 

2,185

 

Amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs

 

 

510

 

 

 

177

 

 

 

142

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

7,078

 

 

 

5,033

 

 

 

3,311

 

Non-employee warrant awards

 

 

838

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued for services

 

 

 

 

 

116

 

 

 

 

Inventory write-down related to restructuring

 

 

 

 

 

2,565

 

 

 

 

Loss on disposal of property

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

 

Non-cash restructuring and other charges

 

 

 

 

 

2,556

 

 

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

 

 

61,784

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax benefit

 

 

(3,300

)

 

 

(5,562

)

 

 

(1,024

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

308

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of warrant liabilities

 

 

83,734

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

 

 

2,026

 

 

 

482

 

 

 

(400

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(381

)

 

 

(1,041

)

 

 

133

 

Interest receivable

 

 

23

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(5

)

Inventories

 

 

(2,981

)

 

 

(6,647

)

 

 

(4,630

)

Other current and long term assets

 

 

(3,348

)

 

 

(1,528

)

 

 

728

 

Accounts payable

 

 

(531

)

 

 

(356

)

 

 

1,096

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

2,093

 

 

 

1,112

 

 

 

5,371

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

1,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred gain on sale of SurgiBot assets

 

 

7,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities

 

 

(39,795

)

 

 

(52,386

)

 

 

(38,759

)

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payment for acquisition of a business

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(25,000

)

Purchase of property and equipment

 

 

(1,566

)

 

 

(1,361

)

 

 

(1,234

)

Purchase of intellectual property

 

 

(425

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities

 

 

(1,991

)

 

 

(1,361

)

 

 

(26,234

)

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payment of debt

 

 

(13,343

)

 

 

(6,902

)

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt and warrants, net of issuance costs

 

 

13,005

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,887

 

Payment of contingent consideration

 

 

(7,181

)

 

 

(1,182

)

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants, net of issuance costs

 

 

77,579

 

 

 

58,029

 

 

 

58,331

 

Taxes paid related to net share settlement of vesting of restricted stock units

 

 

(168

)

 

 

(168

)

 

 

(73

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants

 

 

34,479

 

 

 

166

 

 

 

259

 

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities

 

 

104,371

 

 

 

49,943

 

 

 

68,404

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

431

 

 

 

(55

)

 

 

22

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

63,016

 

 

 

(3,859

)

 

 

3,433

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period

 

 

34,590

 

 

 

38,449

 

 

 

35,016

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period

 

$

97,606

 

 

$

34,590

 

 

$

38,449

 

Supplemental Disclosure for Cash Flow Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

899

 

 

$

1,289

 

 

$

973

 

Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfer of inventory to property and equipment

 

$

1,258

 

 

$

3,198

 

 

$

 

Issuance of common stock as contingent consideration

 

$

5,227

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Relative fair value of warrants issued with debt

 

$

300

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Reclass of warrant liability to common stock and additional paid in capital

 

$

78,359

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Transfer of in-process research and development to intellectual property

 

$

17,913

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Cashless exercise of warrants

 

$

149

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Issuance of common stock warrants

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

97

 

Contingent consideration related to acquisition

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

23,900

 

Issuance of common stock related to acquisition

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

43,677

 

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 
Operating Activities:        

Net loss

 $(78,433) $(75,561)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities:

        

Depreciation

  3,276   3,368 

Amortization of intangible assets

  453   7,708 

(Accretion) amortization of discounts and premiums on investments, net

  (482)  565 

Stock-based compensation

  7,918   8,416 

Deferred tax expense

  132   318 

Change in inventory reserves

  324   620 

Bad debt expense

  -   9 

Property and equipment impairment

  374   1,431 

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

  -   122 

Change in fair value of warrant liabilities

  (1,232)  - 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

  964   (1,115)
         

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Accounts receivable

  (1,178)  (1,528)

Inventories

  129   (2,302)

Operating lease right-of-use assets

  (206)  232 

Prepaid expenses

  424   (450)

Employee retention tax credit receivable

  554   757 

Other current and long-term assets

  1,173   (2,101)

Accounts payable

  574   35 

Accrued employee compensation and benefits

  881   4,523 

Accrued expenses

  365   (3,955)

Deferred revenue

  233   (55)

Operating lease liabilities

  130   26 

Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities

  (63,627)  (58,937)
         

Investing Activities:

        

Purchase of available-for-sale investments

  (12,268)  (33,886)

Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale investments

  77,335   82,702 

Purchase of property and equipment

  (561)  (1,279)

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities

  64,506   47,537 
         

Financing Activities:

        

Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants, net of issuance costs

  10,118   - 

Taxes paid related to net share settlement of vesting of restricted stock units

  (497)  (350)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants

  5   18 

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) financing activities

  9,626   (332)
         

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  763   (81)

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

  11,268   (11,813)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period

  7,470   19,283 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period

 $18,738  $7,470 
         

Supplemental Disclosure for Cash Flow Information

        

Cash paid for leases

 $1,475  $984 

Cash paid for taxes

 $352  $165 
         

Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:

        

Transfer of inventories to property and equipment

 $2,941  $2,693 

Lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets

 $1,143  $577 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

1.

Organization and CapitalizationDescription of the Business

Asensus Surgical, Inc. (formerly known as TransEnterix, Inc.) (the "Company") is a medical device company that is digitizing the interface between the surgeon and the patient to improve minimally invasive surgerypioneer a new era of Performance-Guided Surgery™ by addressing theunlocking clinical intelligence for surgeons to enable consistently superior outcomes and economic challenges associated with current laparoscopic and robotic options in today's value-based healthcare environment.a new standard of surgery. The Company is focused on the market development for and commercialization of the Senhance™Senhance® Surgical System, which digitizes laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery. The system allows for robotic precision, haptic feedback, surgeon camera control via eye sensing and improved ergonomics while offering responsible economics.

The Senhance System has been granted a CE Mark in Europe for laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic surgery, as well as limited thoracic operations excluding cardiac and vascular surgery. In April 2017, the Company submitted a 510(k) application to the FDA for the Senhance System. On October 13, 2017, the Company received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for use in laparoscopic colorectal and gynecologic surgery.or MIS. The Senhance System is available for sale in the U.S., the EUfirst and select other countries.

The Senhance System is aonly digital, multi-port robotic surgery system which allows multiple robotic armslaparoscopic platform designed to control instruments and a camera. The system features advanced technology to enable surgeons withmaintain laparoscopic MIS standards while providing digital benefits such as haptic feedback, robotic precision, comfortable ergonomics, advanced instrumentation including 3mm micro-laparoscopic instruments, 5mm articulating instruments, eye-sensing camera control and the abilityfully-reusable standard instruments to move the camera via eye movement. The system replicates laparoscopic motion that is familiarhelp maintain per-procedure costs similar to experienced surgeons, and integrates three-dimensional high definition (“3DHD”) vision technology. The Senhance System also offers responsible economics to hospitals by offering robotic technology with reusable instruments thereby reducing additional costs per surgery when compared to other robotic solutions.

The Company also developed the SurgiBot™ System, a single-port, robotically enhanced laparoscopic surgical platform. On December 18, 2017, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement with Great Belief International Limited (“GBIL”) to advance the SurgiBot System towards global commercialization.  The agreement transfers ownership of the SurgiBot System assets, while the Company retains the option to distribute or co-distribute the SurgiBot System outside of China. Upon completion of the transfer of all SurgiBot System assets, GBIL will have the SurgiBot System manufactured in China and obtain Chinese regulatory clearance from the China Food and Drug Administration (“CFDA”), while entering into a nationwide distribution agreement with China National Scientific and Instruments and Materials Company (“CSIMC”) for the Chinese market.  The agreement provides the Company with proceeds of at least $29 million, of which $7.5 million was received in December 2017. An additional $7.5 million is expected to be received by March 31, 2018, which includes a $3.0 million equity investment at $2.33 per share. The remaining $14 million, representing minimum royalties, will be paid beginning at the earlier of receipt of Chinese regulatory approval or five years.

On September 18, 2015, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Sofar S.p.A., (“Sofar”) as seller, Vulcanos S.r.l. (“Vulcanos”), as the acquired company, and TransEnterix International, Inc. (“TransEnterix International”), a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company which was incorporated in September 2015, as buyer. The closing of the transactions occurred on September 21, 2015 (the “Closing Date”) pursuant to which the Company acquired all of the membership interests of Vulcanos from Sofar (now known as the “Senhance Acquisition”), and changed the name of Vulcanos to TransEnterix Italia S.r.l (“TransEnterix Italia”). The Senhance Acquisition included all of the assets, employees and contracts related to the Senhance System. See Note 3 for a description of the related transactions.

On September 3, 2013, TransEnterix Surgical, Inc. a Delaware corporation (“TransEnterix Surgical”), and SafeStitch Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SafeStitch”) consummated a merger transaction whereby TransEnterix Surgical merged with a merger subsidiary of SafeStitch, with TransEnterix Surgical as the surviving entity in the merger (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, TransEnterix Surgical became a wholly owned subsidiary of SafeStitch. On December 6, 2013, SafeStitch changed its name to TransEnterix, Inc. and increased the authorized shares of common stock from 225,000,000 to 750,000,000, and authorized 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.

As used herein, the term “Company” refers to the combination of SafeStitch and TransEnterix Surgical after giving effect to the Merger, and includes TransEnterix International, Inc.; TransEnterix Italia S.r.l.; TransEnterix Europe S.à.R.L; Bertrange, Swiss Branch, Lugano; TransEnterix Asia Pte. Ltd.; and TransEnterix Taiwan Ltd. after giving effect to the Senhance Acquisition, the term “SafeStitch” refers to the historic business of SafeStitch Medical, Inc. prior to the Merger, and the term “TransEnterix Surgical” refers to the historic business of TransEnterix Surgical, Inc. prior to the Merger.

traditional laparoscopy.

 


2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries.

Going Concern

The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using U.S. GAAP applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $939.4 million and working capital of $23.8 million as of December 31, 2023. The Company has not established sufficient sales revenues to cover its operating costs and requires additional capital to proceed with its operating plan. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable.

The Company will need to obtain additional financing to proceed with its business plan. Management's plan to obtain additional resources for the Company may include additional sales of equity, traditional financing, such as loans, entry into a strategic collaboration, entry into an out-licensing arrangement or provision of additional distribution rights in some or all of our markets. However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any or all of its plans. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to meet its existing obligations, and to continue as a going concern within one year from the date that these financial statements are issued. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.

Principles of Consolidation and Foreign Currency Considerations

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, SafeStitch LLC, TransEnterixAsensus Surgical US, Inc., TransEnterixAsensus International, Inc., TransEnterixAsensus Surgical Italia S.r.l., TransEnterixAsensus Surgical Europe S.à.R.L, Bertrange, Swiss Branch, Lugano, TransEnterix Asia Pte. Ltd. and TransEnterix r.l., Asensus Surgical Taiwan Ltd., Asensus Surgical Japan K.K., Asensus Surgical Israel Ltd., Asensus Surgical Netherlands B.V., and Asensus Surgical Canada, Inc. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The functional currency of the Company’s operational foreign subsidiaries is predominantly the Euro. The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The cumulative translation effect for a subsidiary using a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity which was $0.6 million and $1.9 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

The Company’s intercompany accounts are denominated in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary. Gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables that the Company considers to be of a long-term investment nature are recorded as a cumulative translation adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, while gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables from a foreign subsidiary for which the Company anticipates settlement in the foreseeable future are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The net gains and losses included in net loss in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were not material.

Risk and Uncertainties

The Company is subject to risks similar to other similarly sized companies in the medical device industry. These risks include, without limitation: the historical lack of profitability; the Company’s ability to raise additional capital; its ability to successfully develop, clinically test, obtain regulatory clearance for and commercialize its products and products in development; negative impacts on the Company's operations caused by the hostilities in the Middle East and other geopolitical factors; the success of its market development efforts; the timing and outcome of the regulatory review process for its products; changes in the healthcare regulatory environments of the United States, the European Union, Japan, Taiwan and other countries in which the Company operates or intends to operate; its ability to attract and retain key management, marketing and scientific personnel; its ability to successfully prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, defend and enforce patent claims and other intellectual property rights; its ability to successfully transition from a research and development company to a marketing, sales and distribution company; competition in the market for robotic and digital surgical devices; and its ability to identify and pursue development of additional products.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include identifiable intangibleimpairment considerations for long-lived assets, and goodwill,fair value estimates related to contingent consideration, warrant liabilities, stock compensation expense, restructuringrevenue recognition, short-term investments, changes in inventory reserves, inventory classification between current and other charges, excessnon-current, measurement of lease liabilities and obsolete inventory reserves,corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, and deferred tax asset valuation allowances.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash, and Investments

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Restricted cash atas of December 31, 20172023 and 2022 includes $6.0$1.6 million in a money market account, held in connection with the Company’s notes payable (see Note 13) and $389,000$1.1 million, respectively, in cash accounts held as collateral primarily under the terms of an office operating lease,leases, credit cards, and automobile leases.leases, and a guarantee required by the government of a country for a 2019 VAT refund.

 

The Company’s investments as of December 31, 2023 consisted of corporate bonds that were classified as available-for-sale. Investments classified as available-for-sale are measured at fair value, and net unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheets until realized. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity computed under the effective interest method. Such amortization and accretion are included in interest expense, net. There were no gross realized gains or loss for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Investments with remaining maturities at date of purchase greater than 90 days and remaining maturities as of the reporting period less than one year are classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining maturities greater than one year are classified as long-term investments. 

There have been no credit losses for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, and no allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. Factors considered in determining whether a credit loss exists include credit ratings and other qualitative factors for each security type in the portfolio.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures the fair value of money market funds, certain U.S. treasury securities, and equity investments with readily determinable value based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets as Level 1 securities. Marketable securities measured at fair value using Level 2 inputs are primarily comprised of commercial paper and corporate notes and bonds without readily determinable value. The Company reviews trading activity and pricing for these investments as of the measurement date. When sufficient quoted pricing for identical securities is not available, the Company uses market pricing and other observable market inputs for similar securities obtained from various third-party data providers. These inputs either represent quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or have been derived from observable market data. This approach results in the Level 2 classification of these securities within the fair value hierarchy. The Company measures contingent consideration at fair value using a Monte-Carlo simulation utilizing Level 3 inputs. These inputs include the probability of achieving each of the potential milestones, revenue volatility, and an estimated discount rate associated with the risks of the expected cash flows attributable to the achievement of various milestones.

Concentrations and Credit Risk

The Company’s principal financial instruments subject to potential concentration of credit risk are cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash), and investments, including amounts held in money market accounts.funds, commercial paper, and corporate bonds. The Company places cash deposits with a federally insured financial institution. The Company maintains its cash at banks and financial institutions it considers to be of high credit quality; however, the Company’s domestic cash deposits may at times exceed the FDICFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s insured limit. Balances in excess of federally insured limitations may not be insured. The Company has not experienced losses on these accounts, and management believes that the Company is not exposed to significant risks on such accounts. Investments are stated at their estimated fair values, based on quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments. The counterparties to the agreements relating to the Company’s investments consist of various major corporations, financial institutions, and government agencies of high credit standing.

The Company’s accounts receivable are derived from net revenuesales and leases to customers located throughout the world. The Company evaluates its customers’ financial condition and, generally, requires no collateral from its customers. The Company provides reserveshad one customer that accounted for potential credit losses but has not experienced significant losses to date. The Company had eight customers who constituted 100%83% and 69% of the Company’s net accounts receivable atas of December 31, 2017.2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. The Company had one customer who constituted 100% of the Company’s net accounts receivable at December 31, 2016 and one customer who constituted 100% of the Company’s net accounts receivable at December 31, 2015. The Company had eighttwo customers whothat accounted for 100%33% and 19% of salesrevenue in 2017, 2023, and one customer who accounted for 100%47% of salesrevenue in 2016. There were no sales in 2015.2022, respectively.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded at net realizable value, which includes an allowance for estimated uncollectable accounts.expected credit losses. The allowance for uncollectible accounts was determinedexpected credit losses is based on the Company’s assessment of collectability of customer accounts. The Company regularly reviews the allowance by considering factors such as historical collection experience.experience, credit quality, the age of the accounts receivable balances, and current and future economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. The allowance for expected credit losses was $1.6 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or net realizable value. Inventory costs include direct materials, direct labor, and normal manufacturing overhead. The Company records reserves, when necessary, to reduce the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value. Management considers historical consumption and forecast demand in relation to the inventory on hand, competitiveness of product offerings, market conditions and product life cycles when determining excess and obsolescence and net realizable value adjustments. At the point of loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established, and any subsequent improvements in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.

Any inventory on hand at the measurement date in excess of the Company’sCompany's current requirements based on anticipated levels of sales is classified as long-term on the Company’sCompany's consolidated balance sheets. The Company's classification of long-term inventory requires it to estimate the portion of on hand inventory that can be realized over the upcoming twelve months.


Identifiable

Definite-Lived Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Identifiable intangible assets are recorded at cost, or when acquired as part of a business acquisition, at estimated fair value. Certain intangible assets are amortized over 5 to 10 years. Similar to tangible personal property and equipment, the Company periodically evaluates identifiable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.- Intellectual Property

Intellectual property consists of purchased patent rights and developed research and developmenttechnology acquired as part of a business acquisition. Developed technology includes reclassified in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) assets related to (i) the Senhance System acquired in 2015 and reclassified in 2017 and (ii) a 2018 acquisition and reclassified in 2020. Amortization of the patent rights is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the patents of 10 years. Amortization of the developed research and developmenttechnology is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of 5 to 7 years. This method approximates the period over which the Company expects to receive the benefit from these assets. See Note 17 for additional information related to the write-off

Indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as goodwill, are not amortized. The Company tests the carrying amounts of goodwillperiodically evaluates intellectual property for recoverability on an annual basis at December 31 or whenimpairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate evidence a potential impairment exists, using a fair value based test. Thethat the carrying amount may not be recoverable. To determine the recoverability, the Company continues to operate in one segment, which is considered toevaluates the probability that future estimated undiscounted net cash flows will be less than the sole reporting unit and therefore, goodwill is tested for impairment at the enterprise level. See Note 10 for additional information related to goodwill impairment recorded during the second quarter of 2016. No impairment existed at December 31, 2017 or 2015.

In-Process Research and Development

In-process research and development (“IPR&D”) assets represent the fair value assigned to technologies that were acquired, which at the time of acquisition have not reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use. IPR&D assets are considered to be indefinite-lived until the completion or abandonmentcarrying amount of the associated research and development projects. During the period that the IPR&D assets are considered indefinite-lived, they are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if the Company becomes aware of any events occurring or changes in circumstances that indicate that the fair value of the IPR&D assetsassets. If such estimated cash flows are less than theirthe carrying amounts. If and when development is complete, which generally occurs upon regulatory approval, andamount of the Company is able to commercialize products associated with the IPR&D assets, thesethen such assets are then deemed definite-lived and are amortized based onwritten down to their estimated useful lives at that point in time. If development is terminated or abandoned, the Company may have a full or partial impairment charge related to the IPR&D assets, calculated as the excess of carrying value of the IPR&D assets over fair value. The IPR&DNo impairment of intellectual property was acquired on September 21, 2015. No impairment existed atidentified during the years ended December 31, 20162023 and 2015.2022.

On October 13, 2017, upon regulatory approval and the ability to commercialize the products associated with the IPR&D assets, the assets were deemed definite-lived, reclassified to intellectual property and are now amortized based on their estimated useful lives.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists primarily of operating lease Senhance System assets, machinery, manufacturing equipment, demonstration equipment, computer equipment, furniture, and leasehold improvements, which are recorded at cost.

cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

 

Machinery, manufacturing and

  

Years

 

Operating lease assets – Senhance System leasing

  5  

Machinery, manufacturing, and demonstration equipment

 3-5 

Computer equipment

  3  

Furniture

  5  

Leasehold improvements

 

Lesser of lease term or 3-10

 

 demonstration equipment

3-5 years

Computer equipment

3 years

Furniture

5 years

Leasehold improvements

Lesser of lease term or 3 to 10 years

Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to operations. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-livedproperty and equipment assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. To determine the recoverability of its long-lived assets, the Company evaluates the probability that future estimated undiscounted net cash flows will be less than the carrying amount of the assets. If such estimated cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the long-lived assets, then such assets are written down to their fair value.

During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge of $0.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of property and equipment to its estimated fair value. The Company’s estimates of anticipatedproperty and equipment impairment is associated with returned Senhance Systems under operating leases and Senhance Systems currently under operating leases that are not expected to generate future cash flows sufficient to recover their net book value. The fair value was estimated based on the discounted cash flows expected to be produced by the property and equipment. The impairment was recorded in property and equipment impairment on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Operating Leases

The Company has operating leases for its corporate office buildings, vehicles, and machinery and equipment. At inception, the Company determines whether an agreement represents a lease, and at commencement, it evaluates each lease agreement to determine whether the lease constitutes an operating or financing lease.

The Company accounts for lease components and non-lease components as a single component. Non-lease components consist of common area maintenance payments for most real estate leases, which are determined based on costs incurred by the lessor. Many of the Company’s leases include base rental periods coupled with options to renew or terminate the lease, generally at the Company’s discretion.  In evaluating the lease term, the Company considers whether renewal is reasonably certain.  To the extent a significant economic incentive exists to renew the lease, the option is included within the lease term.  Based on the Company’s leases, renewal options generally do not provide a significant economic incentive and are therefore excluded from the lease term. While its operating leases range from one year to ten years, some may include options to extend the lease generally between one year and six years, and some may include options to terminate the leases within one year.

The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, the Company utilizes the appropriate incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, subject to any changes in the lease or expectations regarding the terms.

Implementation Costs in a Cloud Computing Arrangement

The Company capitalizes qualified implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract. These capitalized implementation costs are recorded within other current and long-term assets, and are generally amortized over the fixed, non-cancellable term of the associated hosting arrangement on a straight-line basis and included within operating expenses.

Employee Retention Tax Credit Receivable

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) included an Employee Retention Tax Credit (“ERTC”) provision designed to encourage employers to keep employees on their payroll. The ERTC is a refundable tax credit against certain payroll taxes paid by employers for eligible wages. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company submitted an ERTC refund for $1.3 million and recorded the amount into Other Income (Expense) on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company received $0.7 million of the ERTC refund during the year ended December 31, 2022 and received the remaining estimated useful lives of long-lived assets could be reduced in$0.6 million during the future, resulting in a reduction to the carrying amount of long-lived assets.year ended December 31, 2023.


Contingent Consideration

Contingent consideration is recorded as a liability and is the estimate of the fair value of potential milestone payments related to business acquisitions. Contingent consideration is measured at fair value using a discounted cash flow modelMonte-Carlo simulation utilizing significant unobservable inputs including the probability of achieving each of the potential milestones, future Euro-to-USD exchange rates, revenue volatility and an estimated discount rate associated with the risks of the expected cash flows attributable to the various milestones. Significant increases or decreases in any of the probabilities of success or changes in expected timelines for achievement of any of these milestones would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value of these milestones, respectively, and commensurate changes to the associated liability. The contingent consideration is revalued at each reporting period and changes in fair value are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Deferred Gain on Sale

On September 21, 2015, the Company completed the strategic acquisition, through its wholly owned subsidiary TransEnterix International, from Sofar S.p.A., an Italian company (“Sofar”), an Italian company, of SurgiBot Assets

In conjunctionall of the assets, employees and contracts related to the advanced robotic system for minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery now known as the Senhance System. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, as amended in 2016, as of December 31, 2023, the Company has accrued $2.2 million of estimated fair value of remaining contingent consideration related to a milestone of €15.0 million which shall be payable upon achievement of trailing revenues from sales or services contracts of the Senhance System of at least €25.0 million over a calendar quarter or in the event that (i) the Company or Asensus International is acquired, (ii) the Company significantly reduces or suspends selling efforts of the Senhance System, or (iii) the Company acquires a business that offers alternative products that are directly competitive with the agreement with GBIL in relationSenhance System. In 2022, Sofar assigned its right to receive the transfer of the SurgiBot System assets, the Company received $7.5 million in December 2017.  This amount was included in deferred gain in sale of SurgiBot assets on the consolidated balance sheet pending transfer of the assets.contingent payment to Three Heads Investment S.r.l.

Warrant Liabilities

The Company’s Series A Warrants and Series B Warrantswarrants (see Note 16)“Note 14 – Equity Offerings,”) are measured at fair value using a simulationBlack-Scholes-Merton model option-pricing model which takes into account, as of the valuation date, factors including the current exercise price, the expected life of the warrant, the current price of the underlying stock, its expected stock price volatility, holding costthe expected dividend yield which is assumed to be zero since The Company has not paid and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its shares of common stock and the risk-free interest rate foris based on U.S. Treasury rates whose term is consistent with the term of the warrant (see Note 5)“Note 6 – Fair Value,”). The warrant liability is revalued at each reporting period and changes in fair value are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The selection of the appropriate valuation model and the inputs and assumptions that are required to determine the valuation requires significant judgment and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of the related liability and reported amounts of the change in fair value. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and changes in these estimates are recorded when known. As the warrant liability is required to be measured at fair value at each reporting date, it is reasonably possible that these estimates and assumptions could change in the near term.

Translation of Foreign Currencies

The functional currency of the Company’s operational foreign subsidiaries is Euros. The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The cumulative translation effect for a subsidiary using a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar is included in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

The Company’s intercompany accounts are denominated in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary. Gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables that the Company considers to be of a long-term investment nature are recorded as a cumulative translation adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, while gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables from a foreign subsidiary for which the Company anticipates settlement in the foreseeable future are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The net gains and losses included in net loss in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the years December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 were not significant.

Business Acquisitions

Business acquisitions are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, “Business Combinations.” ASC 805 requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values, as determined in accordance with ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements,” as of the acquisition date. For certain assets and liabilities, book value approximates fair value. In addition, ASC 805 establishes that consideration transferred be measured at the closing date of the acquisition at the then-current market price. Under ASC 805, acquisition related costs (i.e., advisory, legal, valuation and other professional fees) and certain acquisition-related restructuring charges impacting the target company are expensed in the period in which the costs are incurred. The application of the acquisition method of accounting requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions related to the estimated fair values of net assets acquired.

Significant judgments are used during this process, particularly with respect to intangible assets. Generally, intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles are not amortized, but are annually assessed for impairment. Therefore, the purchase price allocation to intangible assets and goodwill has a significant impact on future operating results.


Risk and Uncertainties

The Company is subject to a number of risks similar to other similarly-sized companies in the medical device industry. These risks include, without limitation, the historical lack of profitability; the Company’s ability to raise additional capital; its ability to successfully develop, clinically test and commercialize its products; the timing and outcome of the regulatory review process for its products; changes in the health care and regulatory environments of the United States, Italy, other countries in the European Union, and other countries in which the Company intends to operate; its ability to attract and retain key management, marketing and scientific personnel; competition from new entrants; its ability to successfully prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, defend and enforce patent claims and other intellectual property rights; its ability to successfully transition from a research and development company to a marketing, sales and distribution concern; competition in the market for robotic surgical devices; and its ability to identify and pursue development of additional products.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue consists of product revenue resulting from the salessale of systems,Senhance Systems, Senhance System components, and instruments and accessories. Service revenue consists of revenue related to Senhance System service agreements. Lease revenue consists of revenue generated from utilizing the Senhance System, instruments and accessories, and service revenue.servicing of the Senhance System under operating lease agreements. The Company recognizes revenueaccounts for a contract with a customer when persuasive evidencethere is a legally enforceable contract between the Company and the customer, the rights of an arrangement exists, deliverythe parties are identified, the contract has occurred or service has been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable,commercial substance, and collectability of the contract consideration is reasonably assured. Revenue is presentedprobable. The Company's revenues are measured based on considerations specified in the contract with each customer, net of any sales incentives and taxes collected from customers that are remitted to government authorities. The Company’s Senhance System sale arrangements could include a five-year service period; the first year of service is generally free and included in the Senhance System sale arrangement with an option to purchase the remaining four years at a stated service price.

The Company’s Senhance System sale arrangements generally contain multiple products and services. For these consolidated sale arrangements, the Company generally recognizes revenue ataccounts for individual products and services as separate performance obligations if they are distinct, which is if a product or service is separately identifiable from other items in the consolidated package, and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer. The Company’s Senhance System sale arrangements may include a combination of the following points in time:

System sales.  For systems sold directly to end customers, revenue is recognized when acceptance occurs, which is deemed to have occurred upon customer acknowledgment of delivery or installation, depending on the terms of the arrangement. The Senhance Systems are delivered with a software component. However, because the software and non-software elements function together to deliver the system’s essential functionality, the Company's arrangements are excluded from being accounted for under software revenue recognition guidance.

Instruments and accessories.  Revenue from sales of instruments and accessories is generally recognized at the time of shipment. Revenue from services related to the supply and management of instruments and accessories is recognized as the services are rendered.

Service.  Service revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the service period. Revenue related to services performed on a time-and-materials basis is recognized when it is earned and billable.

The Company'sperformance obligations: system(s), system sale arrangements contain multiple elements including a system(s),components, instruments, accessories, and system service. The Company generally delivers all of the elements, other than service, within days of entering into the system sale arrangement. Each of these elements is a separate unit of accounting. System accessories, instruments, and service are also sold on a stand-alone basis.services.

 

For multiple-element arrangements that contain multiple performance obligations, revenue is allocated to each unitperformance obligation based on its relative estimated standalone selling price. When available, standalone selling prices are based on observable prices at which the Company separately sells the products or services.

The Company recognizes revenues when or as the performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of accountingthe product or service to a customer. The Company generally recognizes revenue for the performance obligations as follows:

System sales. For Senhance Systems and Senhance System components sold directly to end customers (including those arising from Senhance System purchases under lease rights to purchase), revenue is recognized when the Company transfers control to the customer, which is generally at the point when acceptance occurs that indicates customer acknowledgment of delivery or installation, depending on the terms of the arrangement. For lease buyouts, where the customer has already acknowledged installation of the system, transfer of control occurs when the Company receives an executed contract for the lease buyout of the Senhance System. For Senhance Systems sold through distributors, for which distributors are responsible for installation, revenue is recognized generally upon delivery. The Company’s Senhance System arrangements generally do not provide a right of return. The Senhance Systems are generally covered by a one-year warranty. Warranty costs were not material for the periods presented.

Instruments and accessories. Revenue from sales of instruments and accessories is recognized when control is transferred to the customers, which generally occurs at the time of shipment, but also occurs at the time of delivery depending on the customer arrangement.

Service. Service revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the service period as the customers benefit from the service throughout the service period. Revenue related to services performed on a time-and-materials basis is recognized when performed.

The Company invoices its customers based on the billing schedules in its sales arrangements. Payments are generally due 30 to 60 days from the date of invoice. Contract assets for the periods presented primarily represent the difference between the revenue that was recognized based on the relative selling price of the related performance obligations and the contractual billing terms in the arrangements and are included in accounts receivable.

In connection with assets recognized from the costs to obtain a contract with a customer, the Company determined that the sales incentive programs for its sales team do not meet the requirements to be capitalized as the Company does not expect to generate future economic benefits from the related revenue from the initial sales transaction and such costs are expensed as incurred.

Senhance System Leasing

The Company enters into lease arrangements with certain qualified customers. Revenue related to arrangements including lease elements are allocated to lease and non-lease elements based on their relative standalone selling prices. Relative selling prices are based first on vendor specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), then on third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”) when VSOE does not exist, and then on management's best estimate of the selling price (“BESP”) when VSOE and TPE do not exist.

The Company’s system sale arrangementsLease elements generally include a one-year period of free service,Senhance System, while non-lease elements generally include instruments, accessories, and services. For some lease arrangements, the customers are provided with the right to purchase the leased Senhance System at some point during and/or at the end of the lease term. In some arrangements lease payments are based on the usage of the Senhance System. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, variable lease revenue related to usage-based arrangements was not material.  

In determining whether a transaction should be classified as a sales-type, operating, or direct financing lease, the Company considers the following terms at lease commencement: (1) whether title of the Senhance System transfers automatically or for a nominal fee by the end of the lease term, (2) whether the present value of the minimum lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the leased Senhance System, (3) whether the lease term is for the customermajor part of the remaining economic life of the leased System, (4) whether the lease grants the lessee an option to purchase service annually thereafter. The revenue allocatedthe leased Senhance System that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, and (5) whether the underlying Senhance System is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the free service periodCompany at the end of the lease term. All such arrangements through December 31, 2023 are classified as operating leases. Revenue related to lease elements from operating lease arrangements is deferred andgenerally recognized ratablyon a straight-line basis over the free service period.lease term or based upon Senhance System usage. As of December 31, 2023, future minimum lease payments due from customers was $2.2 million, which is expected to be received over the next one to two years.

 

Because the Company has neither VSOE nor TPE for its systems, the allocation of revenue is based on BESP for the systems sold. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale, had the product been sold on a stand-alone basis. The Company determines BESP for its systems by considering multiple factors, including, but not limited to, features and functionality of the system, geographies, type of customer, and market conditions. The Company regularly reviews BESP and maintains internal controls over establishing and updating these estimates.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue sold consists of contract manufacturing, materials, labor and manufacturing overhead incurred internally to produce the products. Depreciation expense related to leased systems is included in the cost of revenue. Shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company are included in the cost of revenue.  We expense all inventory obsolescence provisions as cost of revenue.


Research and Development Costs

Research and development expenses primarily consist of engineering, product development and regulatory expenses, incurred in the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company follows ASC 718 (“Stock Compensation”) and ASC 505-50 (“Equity-Based Payments to Non-employees”), which provide guidance in accountingrecognizes expenses for share-based awards exchanged for services rendered and requires companiesequal to expense the estimated fair value of these awards over the requisite service period. For awards granted to non-employees,The Company recognizes as expense, the Company determines thegrant-date fair value of thestock options and other stock-based compensation awards granted as eitherissued to employees and non-employee directors over the fair value ofrequisite service periods, which are typically the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete.

The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock-based awards based on estimated fair values on the date of grant for awards granted to employees.vesting periods. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to determineestimate the fair value of stock options. The volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes-Merton model is based on the Company’s historical volatility. The expected term of options granted has been determined based upon the simplified method, because the Company does not have sufficient historical information regarding its options to derive the expected term. Under this approach, the expected term is the mid-point between the weighted average of vesting period and the contractual term. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury rates whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. The Company has not paid and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its shares of common stock; therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero. The Company estimates forfeitures based on its historical experience and adjusts the estimated forfeiture rate based upon actual experience. For performance-based restricted stock awards with performance conditions, we begin recognizing compensation expense when it becomes probable that the performance condition will be attained.

The fair value of restricted stock units is determined by the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The expense associated withSee “Note 13 – Stock-Based Compensation,” for a detailed discussion of the Company’s stock plans and stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of each award.expense.

The Company records as expense the fair value of stock-based compensation awards, including stock options and restricted stock units. Compensation expense for stock-based compensation was approximately $7,078,000, $5,033,000 and $3,311,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets or liabilities for the temporary differences between financial reporting and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities, and for tax carryforwards at enacted statutory rates in effect for the years in which the asset or liability is expected to be realized. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income during the period that includes the enactment date. In addition, valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets and liabilities to the amounts expected to be realized.

On December 22, 2017, The Company has elected to account for global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) as a period expense in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Legislation”) was enacted into law, which reducedyear the US federal corporate income tax rate to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. As a result of the newly enacted tax rate, the Company adjusted its U.S. deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017, by applying the new 21% rate, which resulted in a decrease to the deferred tax assets and a corresponding decrease to the valuation allowance of approximately $36.1 million.is incurred.

 

The Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of an income tax position only after determining that the relevant taxing authority would more likely than not sustain the position following audit. For tax positions meeting the more likely than not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant taxing authority. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in the provision for income taxes.

Tax Legislation also implements a territorialregulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax system. Underlaws and regulations and require application of significant judgment. The Company is subject to U.S. federal and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. Due to the territorial tax system, in general,Company’s net operating loss carryforwards, the Company's foreign earnings will no longerCompany may be subject to tax in the U.S. As part of transition to the territorial tax system the Tax Legislation includes a mandatory deemed repatriation ofexamination by authorities for all undistributed foreign earnings that are subject to a U.S. income tax. The Company estimates that the deemed repatriation will not result in any additional U.S.previously filed income tax liability as it estimates it currently has no undistributed foreign earnings.returns.

 

The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 118 which will allow the Company to record provisional amounts related to accounting for the Tax Legislation during a measurement period which is similar to the measurement period used when accounting for business combinations. The Company is following the guidance set forth by SAB 118 and any amounts calculated are provisional estimates and will be reevaluated as more information or guidance becomes available. The Company will continue to assess the impact of the Tax Legislation on its business and consolidated financial statements.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources.


Segments

The Company operates in one business segment—the research, development and sale of medical device robotics to improve minimally invasive surgery.MIS. The Company’s chief operating decision maker (determined to be the Chief Executive Officer) does not manage any part of the Company separately, and the allocation of resources and assessment of performance are based on the Company’s consolidated operating results. Approximately 60% and 49% of the Company’s total consolidated assets are located within the U.S. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The remaining assets are mostly located in Europe and are primarily related to the Company’s facility in Italy, and include goodwill, intellectual property, other current assets, property and equipment, cash, accounts receivable and inventory of $99.9 million and $90.4 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively associated with the Senhance Acquisition in September 2015. Total assets outside of the U.S. excluding goodwill amounted to 31% and 40% of total consolidated assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recognizes sales by geographic area based on the country in which the customer is based. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, 18%, 0%, and 0%, respectively, of net revenue were generated in the United States; and 61%, 100%, and 0% were generated in Europe; and 21%, 0% and 0% were generated in Asia.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. The amendments in this update are intended to simplify the accounting for certain equity-linked financial instruments and embedded features with down round features that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Under the new guidance, a down round feature will no longer need to be considered when determining whether certain financial instruments or embedded features should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments. That is, a down round feature will no longer preclude equity classification when assessing whether an instrument or embedded feature is indexed to an entity's own stock. In addition, the amendments clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. These amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU should not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017,November 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, (“ASU”) 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. Under the new standard, goodwill impairment would be measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, notor ASU, No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to exceed the carrying value of goodwill.Reportable Segment Disclosures. This ASU eliminates existing guidance that requires an entitylooks to determine goodwill impairmentprovide improvements to the segment disclosure by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by hypothetically assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquiredproviding users with more decision-useful information about reportable segments in a business combination. This ASU is effective prospectivelypublic entity. The main provisions require a company to disclose, on an annual and interim impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. basis, significant expenses included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss, an amount for other segment items by reportable segment and a description of its composition. It also requires all annual disclosures about a reportable segments’ profit or loss and assets to be reported on an interim basis.

The Company early adopted this ASU as of the beginning of fiscal year 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) which addresses changesis to reduce the presentation diversity of certain cash receipts and cash paymentsbe applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the statement of cash flows, including debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, settlement of certain debt instruments, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, and distributions received from equity method investees.  The guidance becomesfinancial statements with an effective date for all public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including2023, and interim periods within those fiscal years with earlybeginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt allThe Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU.

In December 2023, the amendmentsFASB issues ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. This ASU looks to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures primarily related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. The main provisions to the rate reconciliation disclosure require public entities on an annual basis to: disclose specific categories in the same period.rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. The new standard will be applied retrospectively, but may be applied prospectively if retrospective application would be impracticable.  The Company expects certain reclassifications withinmain provisions to the consolidated statementsincome taxes paid disclosure require that all entities disclose on an annual basis: the amount of cash flows relatedincome taxes paid disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes and the amount of income taxes paid disaggregated by individual jurisdictions in which income taxes paid meets a quantitative threshold. This ASU also requires all entities to payments of contingent consideration.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Under ASU 2016-09, the tax effects of stock compensation will be recognized asdisclose: income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense or benefit in the income statement(benefit) disaggregated between domestic and the tax effects of exercised or vested awards will be treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. Along with otherforeign and income tax cash flows, excess tax benefits willexpense (benefit) from continuing operations disaggregated by federal, state and foreign.

This ASU is to be classified as operating activities, and cash paid byapplied on a prospective basis with an employer when directly withholding shareseffective date for tax withholding purposes will be classified as financing activities. Entities may make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (current GAAP) or account for forfeitures when they occur. The threshold to qualify for equity classification permits withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions. Forall public companies, ASU 2016-09 is effectiveentities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods.2024. Early adoption is permitted, however, an entity that elects early adoption must adopt all amendments under the new standard in the same period.permitted. The Company adopted this ASU as of the beginning of fiscal year 2017 and did not elect to account for forfeitures when they occur, but will continue to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.


In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company currently expects that upon adoption, ROU assets and lease liabilities will be recognized in the balance sheet in amounts that the Company does not expect will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements based on the Company’s current leases.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which sets forth a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability. Subsequently, the FASB has issued several standards related to ASU 2014-09 (collectively, the “New Revenue Standard”). The New Revenue Standard requires revenue recognition to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the New Revenue Standard requires expanded disclosures. This New Revenue Standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method when adopted. The New Revenue Standards becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018.

The Company will adopt the New Revenue Standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 using the modified retrospective method resulting in a cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption. The Company has substantially completed its evaluation ofevaluating the impact of the New Revenue Standard on its historical financial statements. The Company’s performance obligations under its existing contracts primarily include the sale of systems, instruments and accessories, as well as services.  The product revenues will be recognized at a point in time upon delivery or installation, depending on the terms of the agreement.  The service revenue will be recognized ratably over time.  The Company has concluded that the timing and measurement of revenue recognition will be materially consistent under the New Revenue Standard, except for the future billings related to future service included in its multi-year contracts that should be part of the consideration allocated to all performance obligations under the New Revenue Standard. Under the current standard, future service billings are considered to be contingent revenue, and therefore, are not included in the consideration allocated. Accordingly, the amount of consideration allocated to the performance obligations identified in the Company’s system arrangements will be different under the New Revenue Standard than the amount allocated under the current standard. In general, this will result in an acceleration of the amount of revenue recognized for system sales with multi-year service contracts. Due to limited sales to date, the Company has evaluated its contracts and has quantified an immaterial cumulative catch-up adjustment upon adoption. The Company continues to evaluate the required disclosures.

The New Revenue Standard is principles based and interpretation of those principles may vary from company to company based on their unique circumstances. It is possible that interpretation, industry practice, and guidance may evolve as companies and the accounting profession work to implement this new standard. While substantially complete, the Company is still in the process of finalizing its evaluation of the effect of the New Revenue Standard on the Company’s historical financial statements and disclosures. The Company will finalize its accounting assessment and quantitative impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. As the Company completes its evaluation of this new standard, new information may arise that could change the Company’s current understanding of the impact to revenue and expense recognized. Additionally, the Company will continue to monitor industry activities and any additional guidance provided by regulators, standards setters, or the accounting profession and adjust the Company’s assessment and implementation plans accordingly.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330). This update requires inventory within the scope of the standard to be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Previous guidance required inventory to be measured at the lower of cost or market (where market was defined as replacement cost, with a ceiling of net realizable value and floor of net realizable value less a normal profit margin). This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted these provisions in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU.

 

3.

Acquisition of Senhance Surgical Robotic SystemRevenue Recognition

On September 21, 2015, the Company completed the strategic acquisition, through its wholly owned subsidiary TransEnterix International, from Sofar, of all of the assets, employees and contracts related to the advanced robotic system for minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery now known as the Senhance System and changed the name of the acquired company from Vulcanos S.r.l. to TransEnterix Italia S.r.l.


Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the consideration consisted of the issuance of 15,543,413 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Securities Consideration”) and approximately $25.0 million U.S. Dollars and €27.5 million Euro in cash consideration (the “Cash Consideration”). The Securities Consideration was issued in full at the closing of the Senhance Acquisition; the Cash Consideration was or will be paid in four tranches, as follows:

(1) $25.0 million of the Cash Consideration was paid at closing.

(2) On December 30, 2016, the Company and Sofar entered into an Amendment to the Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”) to restructure the terms of the second tranche of the Cash Consideration (the “Second Tranche”). Under the Amendment, the Second Tranche was restructured to be paid through the (A) the issuance of 3,722,685 shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate fair market value of €5.0 million and (B) the payment of €5.0 million in cash upon the occurrence of either (i) receipt of clearance from the FDA for the Senhance System; or (ii) the Company having cash on hand of at least $50.0 million, or (iii) successfully completing a financing, raising at least $50.0 million in gross proceeds after September 2015, exclusive of any financing proceeds related to the December 2016 purchase agreement between the Company and Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC.; with payment of simple interest at a rate of 9.0% per annum beginning on December 31, 2016. The Five Million Euro (€ 5,000,000) cash payment began to accrue simple interest at a rate of 9% per annum beginning on December 31, 2016 and continued to accrue interest until November 15, 2017 when it was paid in full. Prior to December 30, 2016, the Second Tranche of the Cash Consideration of €10.0 million was payable after the achievement of both of the following milestones (i) the earlier of approval from the FDA for the Senhance System or December 31, 2016, and (ii) the Company having cash on hand of at least $50.0 million, or successfully completing a financing, raising at least $50.0 million in gross proceeds; with payment of simple interest at a rate of 9.0% per annum between the achievement of the first milestone event and the payment date.

(3) The third tranche of the Cash Consideration (the “Third Tranche”) of €15.0 million shall be payable upon achievement of trailing revenues from sales or services contracts of the Senhance System of at least €25.0 million over a calendar quarter.

(4) The fourth tranche of the Cash Consideration of €2.5 million shall be payable by December 31 of each year as reimbursement for certain debt payments made by Sofar under an existing Sofar loan agreement in such year, with payments beginning as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had paid €1.8 million of the fourth tranche.

The Third Tranche would have been payable even if the Second Tranche was not then payable. In addition, the Third Tranche payments will be accelerated in the event that (i) the Company or TransEnterix International is acquired, (ii) the Company significantly reduces or suspends selling efforts of the Senhance System, or (iii) the Company acquires a business that offers alternative products that are directly competitive with the Senhance System.

Under the Purchase Agreement, 10% of the Securities Consideration was being held in escrow to support Sofar’s representations and warranties under the Purchase Agreement. In accordance with a related escrow agreement, the escrowed shares were released in September 2016. The Company, a subsidiary and Sofar also entered into a Security Agreement, which provides that 10% of the membership interests of TransEnterix Italia have a lien placed thereon by and in favor of Sofar to support the Company’s representations and warranties under the Purchase Agreement. The security interest period was twenty-four months after the closing of the Senhance Acquisition and expired on September 21, 2017.

The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and warranties of the parties and the parties have customary indemnification obligations, which are subject to certain limitations described further in the Purchase Agreement.

In connection with the Senhance Acquisition, the Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2015, with Sofar, pursuant to which the Company agreed to register the Securities Consideration shares for resale following the end of the lock-up periods described below. The resale registration statement has been filed and is effective.

In connection with the Senhance Acquisition, Sofar entered into a Lock-Up Agreement with the Company pursuant to which Sofar agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell, transfer or otherwise convey any of the Securities Consideration over a two-year period following the Closing Date. As of September 21, 2017, all of the Securities Consideration was released from the lock-up restrictions and is eligible to be resold under the effective resale registration statement.

The Senhance Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination utilizing the methodology prescribed in ASC 805. The purchase price for the Senhance Acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values.


The Senhance Acquisition-date fair value of the consideration is as follows (in thousands, except for per share amounts):

Common shares issued

 

 

15,543

 

Closing price per share

 

$

2.81

 

 

 

$

43,677

 

Cash consideration

 

 

25,000

 

Contingent consideration

 

 

23,900

 

Total consideration

 

$

92,577

 

 

The following table summarizespresents revenue disaggregated by type and geography:

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 
  (in thousands) 

U.S.

        

Instruments and accessories

 $205  $211 

Services

  294   300 

Leases

  196   256 

Total U.S. revenue

  695   767 
         

Outside of U.S. ("OUS")

        

Systems

  3,645   2,551 

Instruments and accessories

  1,669   1,565 

Services

  758   1,073 

Leases

  1,810   1,131 

Total OUS revenue

  7,882   6,320 
         

Total

        

Systems

  3,645   2,551 

Instruments and accessories

  1,874   1,776 

Services

  1,052   1,373 

Leases

  2,006   1,387 

Total revenue

 $8,577  $7,087 

Remaining Performance Obligations

The transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations relates to amounts allocated to products and services for which the estimated fair valuesrevenue has not yet been recognized. A significant portion of this amount relates to service obligations performed under the assets acquiredCompany's system sales contracts that will be invoiced and liabilities assumed on September 21, 2015, the daterecognized as revenue in future periods. Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations as of acquisition (in thousands):December 31, 2023 was $0.9 million, which is expected to be recognized over one to four years. 

 

Accounts receivable

 

$

78

 

Inventories

 

 

2,800

 

Current deferred tax asset

 

 

526

 

Other current assets

 

 

4,180

 

Property and equipment

 

 

1,384

 

Intellectual property

 

 

48,500

 

In-process research and development

 

 

17,100

 

Goodwill

 

 

38,348

 

Total assets acquired

 

$

112,916

 

Accounts payable and other liabilities

 

 

1,915

 

Long-term deferred tax liabilities

 

 

18,424

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

92,577

 

62

 

Contract Assets and Liabilities

Deferred revenue for the periods presented was primarily related to service obligations, for which the service fees are billed up-front, generally annually. The associated deferred revenue is generally recognized ratably over the service period. The Company allocated $48.5 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangibledid not have any significant impairment losses on its contract assets of intellectual property that met the separability and contractual legal criterion of ASC 805. The intellectual property is being amortized using the straight-line method over 7 years.

IPR&D is principally the estimated fair value of the Senhance System technology which had not reached commercial technological feasibility nor had alternative future use at the time of the acquisition and therefore the Company considered IPR&D, with assigned values to be allocated among the various IPR&D assets acquired.

Goodwill is calculated as the difference between the acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The goodwill resulting from this acquisition arises largely from synergies expected from combining the operations of TransEnterix Italia with the Company’s existing operations. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes.

All legal, consulting and other costs related to the acquisition, aggregating approximately $4.2 million, have been expensed as incurred and are included in operating expenses in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2015. The results of operations for TransEnterix Italia are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the period from the September 21, 2015 acquisition date.


The following unaudited pro forma information presents the combined results of operationsperiods presented. Revenue recognized for the years ended December 31, 20152023 and 2014, as if2022 was $0.5 million, which was included in the Company had completed the Senhance Acquisition at the beginningdeferred revenue balance of fiscal 2014. The pro forma financial information is provided for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what actual results would have been had the acquisition occurred on the date indicated, nor does it give effect to synergies, cost savings, fair market value adjustments, immaterial amortization expense and other changes expected to result from the acquisition. Accordingly, the pro forma financial results do not purport to be indicative of consolidated results of operations$0.5 million as of the date hereof, for any period ended on the date hereof, or for any other future date or period. December 31, 2022 and 2021.

The pro forma consolidated financialfollowing information has been calculated after applyingsummarizes the Company’s accounting policiescontract assets and includes adjustments for transaction-related costs and amortization of intellectual property.liabilities:

 

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

 

(In thousands except

per share amounts)

 

Revenue

 

$

77

 

 

$

401

 

Net loss

 

 

53,994

 

 

 

46,874

 

Net loss per share

 

$

0.57

 

 

$

0.63

 

  

December 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 
  

(in thousands)

 

Contract assets

 $95  $116 

Deferred revenue

 $711  $465 

 

4.

4.Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash consist of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2023

  

2022

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash

 

$

4,039

 

 

$

1,975

 

 $4,588  $3,473 

Money market

 

 

87,178

 

 

 

22,190

 

 5,521  2,856 

U.S. treasuries

  6,987   - 

Total cash and cash equivalents

 

$

91,217

 

 

$

24,165

 

 $17,096  $6,329 

Restricted cash

 

$

6,389

 

 

$

10,425

 

  1,642   1,141 

Total

 

$

97,606

 

 

$

34,590

 

 $18,738  $7,470 

 

Restricted cash at December 31, 20172023 and 2022 includes $6.0$1.6 million in a money market account, held in connection with the Company’s notes payable and $389,000$1.1 million, respectively, in cash accounts held as collateral primarily under the terms of an office operating lease, credit card agreementcards, automobile leases, and automobile leases. Restricted cash at December 31, 2016 includes $10.0 million in a money market account, held in connection withguarantee required by the Company’s notes payable and $425,000 in cash accounts held as collateral primarily under the termsgovernment of an office operating lease, credit card agreement and automobile leases. a country for a 2019 VAT refund.

 

5.

Fair ValueInvestments, available-for-sale

The Company heldaggregate fair values of investment securities along with cumulative unrealized gains and losses determined on an individual investment security basis and included in other comprehensive loss are as follows:

  

December 31, 2023

 
  

Amortized

Cost

  

Unrealized

Gain

  

Unrealized

Loss

  

Fair

Value

  

Short-term

investments

 
        (in thousands)       

Corporate bonds

 $3,981  $-  $(10) $3,971  $3,971 

Total investments

 $3,981  $-  $(10) $3,971  $3,971 

  

December 31, 2022

 
  

Amortized

Cost

  

Unrealized

Gain

  

Unrealized

Loss

  

Fair

Value

  

Short-term

investments

  

Long-term

investments

 
        (in thousands)       

Commercial paper

 $12,364  $-  $(49) $12,315  $12,315  $- 

Corporate bonds

  55,201   -   (447)  54,754   50,889   3,865 

U.S. government agencies

  999   -   (8)  991   991   - 

Total investments

 $68,564  $-  $(504) $68,060  $64,195  $3,865 

The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of the Company’s available-for-sale investments:

  

December 31, 2023

 
  

Amortized

Cost

  

Fair Value

 
  (in thousands) 

Mature in less than one year

 $3,981  $3,971 

Total

 $3,981  $3,971 

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay certain obligations. There were no sales of investments for the years ended December 31, 2023 or 2022, respectively. There were no realized gains or losses for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 respectively.

6.

Fair Value

The following are categories of assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These assets and liabilities include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, contingent consideration and warrant liabilities. ASC 820-10 (“Fair Value Measurement Disclosure”) requires the valuation using a three-tiered approach, which requires that fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of three tiers. These tiers are: Level 1, defined as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as valuations based on observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable input data; and Level 3, defined as valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. The Company did not have any transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, it is the Company’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements, in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where there exists limited or no observable market data and therefore, are based primarily upon estimates, are often calculated based on the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other factors. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values. The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures.


As prescribed by U.S. GAAP, the Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. An adjustment to the pricing method used within either Level 1 or Level 2 inputs could generate a fair value measurement that effectively falls in a lower level in the hierarchy.

The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures and based on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from period to period. However, the Company expects changes in classifications between levels will be rare.

The carrying values of accounts receivable, interest receivable, accounts payable, and certain accrued expenses at December 31, 2017 and 2016, approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these items. The Company’s notes payable balance also approximates fair value as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, as the interest rates on the notes payable approximate the rates available to the Company as of these dates.

The following are the major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

Description

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 

 

Total

 

Assets measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

91,217

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

91,217

 

Restricted cash

 

 

6,389

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,389

 

Total Assets measured at fair value

 

$

97,606

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

97,606

 

Liabilities measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

12,418

 

 

$

12,418

 

Warrant liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

14,090

 

 

$

14,090

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

26,508

 

 

$

26,508

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2023

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

Quoted Prices
in Active

Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

  

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)

  

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)

 

Total

 

Description

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 

 

Total

 

   (in thousands)   

Assets measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents(1)

 

$

24,165

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

24,165

 

 $17,096  $-  $- $17,096 

Restricted cash

 

 

10,425

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

10,425

 

 1,642  -  - 1,642 

Total Assets measured at fair value

 

$

34,590

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

34,590

 

Short-term investments

  -   3,971   -  3,971 

Total assets measured at fair value

 $18,738  $3,971  $- $22,709 

Liabilities measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

22,800

 

 

$

22,800

 

 $-  $-  $2,220 $2,220 
Warrant Liabilities  -   -   5,888  5,888 

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

22,800

 

 

$

22,800

 

 $-  $-  $8,108 $8,108 

  

December 31, 2022

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets

for Identical

Assets (Level 1)

  

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs (Level 2)

  

Significant Unobservable

Inputs (Level 3)

  

Total

 
Description    (in thousands)    

Assets measured at fair value

                

Cash and cash equivalents (1)

 $6,329  $-  $-  $6,329 

Restricted cash

  1,141   -   -   1,141 

Short-term investments

  -   64,195   -   64,195 

Long-term investments

  -   3,865   -   3,865 

Total assets measured at fair value

 $7,470  $68,060  $-  $75,530 

Liabilities measured at fair value

                

Contingent consideration

 $-  $-  $1,256  $1,256 

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 $-  $-  $1,256  $1,256 

(1) Includes investments that are readily convertible to cash with original maturities of 90 days or less.

The carrying values of accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, employee retention tax credit receivables, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued employee compensation and benefits, accrued expenses, deferred revenue, and other current liabilities as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, approximate to their fair values due to the short-term nature of these items and are considered to be Level 1.

 

The Company’s financial liabilities consisted of contingent consideration potentially payable to SofarThree Heads Investment S.r.l., related to the Senhance Acquisition in SeptemberCompany’s 2015 (Note 3). This liability is reported as Level 3 as estimated fair valueacquisition of the contingent consideration relatedSenhance Surgical System from an assignor to the acquisition requires significant management judgment or estimation and is calculated using the income approach, using various revenue and cost assumptions and applying a probability to each outcome. The change in fair value of the contingent consideration of $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 was primarily due to the change in expected timelines for the achievement of milestones, the effect of the passage of time on the fair value measurement and the impact of foreign currency exchange rates. The change in fair value of the contingent consideration of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to the Amendment to the Purchase Agreement for the Second Tranche (Note 3), the change in expected timelines for the achievement of milestones, the effect of the passage of time on the fair value measurement and the impact of foreign currency exchange rates.Three Heads Investment S.r.l. (the “Senhance Acquisition”). Adjustments associated with the change in fair value of contingent consideration are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

 

On April 28, 2017, the Company sold 24.9 million units (the “Units”), each consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), a Series A warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per share  (the “Series A Warrants”), and a Series B warrant to purchase 0.75 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per share (the “Series B Warrants,” together with the Series A Warrants, the “Warrants”), at an offering price of $1.00 per Unit. Each Series A Warrant was exercisable at any time beginning on the date of issuance, and from time to time thereafter, through and including the first anniversary of the issuance date, unless terminated earlier as provided in the Series A Warrant. Receipt of 510(k) clearance for the Senhance System on October 13, 2017, triggered the acceleration of the expiration date of the Series A Warrants to October 31, 2017 (see Note 19). Each Series B Warrant may be exercised at any time beginning on the date of issuance and from time to time thereafter through and including the fifth anniversary of the issuance date.

The fair value of the Series A Warrants of $2.5 million at the date of issuance was estimated using the Black-Scholes Merton model which used the following inputs: term of 1 year, risk free rate of 1.07%, no dividends, volatility of 73.14%, and share price of $0.65 per share based on the trading price of the Company’s common stock. The fair value of the Series B Warrants of $6.2 million at the date of issuance was estimated using the Black-Scholes Merton model which used the following inputs: term of 5 years, risk free rate of 1.81%, no dividends, volatility of 73.14%, and share price of $0.65 per share based on the trading price of the Company’s common stock. All Series A Warrants were exercised as of December 31, 2017. The fair value of the Series B Warrants of $14.1 million at December 31, 2017 was estimated using the Monte Carlo valuation model which used the following inputs: term of 4.33 years, risk free rate of 2.13%, volatility of 80.6%, share price of $1.93 per share based on the trading price of the Company’s common stock, and probability of additional financing in 2018 of 25% and 2019 of 75%. The change in fair value of warrants for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $83.7 million was included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The following table presents quantitative information about the inputs and valuation methodologies used for the Company’s fair value measurements classified in Level 3for contingent consideration utilizing a Monte-Carlo simulation as of December 31, 20162023 and 2017:December 31, 2022:

 

Valuation

Methodology

Significant

Unobservable Input

Weighted Average

(range, if

applicable)

Contingent  consideration

Probability weighted

income approach

Milestone dates

2018 to 2020

Discount rate

Probability of occurrence

7.5% to 12%

100%

 

Valuation
Methodology

 

 

Significant
Unobservable

Input

 

December 31,
2023

 

  

December 31,
2022

 

 
            

Contingent consideration

Probability
weighted
income
approach

 

Milestone dates

 

2032

  

2032

 
   

Discount rate

  10.0%  16.5%
   

Revenue volatility

  35.0%  45.0%
   

EUR-to-USD exchange rate

  1.10   1.07 

 

The following table presents the long-term portion of the contingent consideration for the year ended December 31, 2023 and summarizes the change in fair value, as determined by Level 3 inputs for all assets and liabilities using unobservable Level 3 inputsthe contingent consideration for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015:2022:

 

 

Fair Value

Measurement at

Reporting Date

(Level 3)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

Common stock

 

 

Contingent

 

 

 

warrants

 

 

consideration

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

 

 

$

 

Additions for contingent consideration

 

 

 

 

 

23,900

 

Change in fair value

 

 

 

 

 

(400

)

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

23,500

 

Payment for contingent consideration

 

 

 

 

 

(1,182

)

Change in fair value

 

 

 

 

 

482

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

22,800

 

Issuance of common stock in exchange for contingent consideration

 

 

 

 

 

(5,227

)

Issuance of warrants

 

 

8,715

 

 

 

 

Payment for contingent consideration

 

 

 

 

 

(7,181

)

Exercise of warrants

 

 

(78,359

)

 

 

 

Change in fair value

 

 

83,734

 

 

 

2,026

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

 

14,090

 

 

$

12,418

 

Current portion

 

 

 

 

 

719

 

Long-term portion

 

 

14,090

 

 

 

11,699

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

14,090

 

 

$

12,418

 


 

 

6.

Accounts Receivable, Net

 

 

Fair Value

 
  

(in thousands)

 

Balance at December 31, 2021

 $2,371 

Change in fair value

  (1,115)

Balance at December 31, 2022

 $1,256 

Change in fair value

  964 

Balance at December 31, 2023

 $2,220 

Warrant Liabilities

During 2023, the Company recorded warrant liabilities related to common stock warrants issued in the registered direct offering in July 2023 (for additional information about the offering, please refer to Note 14 -Equity Offerings).

Warrant liabilities were recorded at their initial estimated fair value. Adjustments associated with changes in fair value of the warrant liabilities are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The following table presentssummarizes changes in estimated fair value of the componentswarrant liabilities for the warrants issued in July 2023 as of accounts receivable:December 31, 2023:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Gross accounts receivable

 

$

1,609

 

 

$

960

 

Allowance for uncollectible accounts

 

 

(73

)

 

 

(73

)

Total accounts receivable, net

 

$

1,536

 

 

$

887

 

Short-term portion

 

$

1,536

 

 

$

621

 

Long-term portion

 

 

 

 

 

266

 

Total accounts receivable

 

$

1,536

 

 

$

887

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 
  (in thousands) 

Balance at December 31, 2022

 $- 

Issuance of warrants

  7,120 

Change in fair value

  (1,232)

Balance at December 31, 2023

 $5,888 

The fair value of the warrant liabilities were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is based on unobservable inputs and is designated as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The following table summarizes the assumptions used in determining fair value of warrant liabilities:

As of December 31,

2023

7.Expected dividend yield

0%

InventoriesExpected volatility

117%

Risk-free interest rate

3.8%

Expected life (in years)

4.6

7.

Inventories

The components of inventories are as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

December 31, 2023

  

December 31, 2022

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Finished goods

 

$

4,432

 

 

$

4,698

 

 $9,200  $11,208 

Raw materials

 

 

6,385

 

 

 

3,185

 

  2,015   2,545 

Total inventories

 

$

10,817

 

 

$

7,883

 

 $11,215  $13,753 
 

Current Portion

 $7,172  $8,284 

Long-term portion

  4,043   5,469 

Total inventories

 $11,215  $13,753 

 

As disclosed in Note 17, the Company executed a restructuring plan in May 20168.Property and wrote down inventory related to the SurgiBot System.  The write down of inventory of $2.6 million is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2016. There were no such write-downs for the year ended December 31, 2017 or 2015.Equipment

 

8.

Other Current Assets

The following table presents the components of other current assets:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Prepaid expenses

 

$

1,519

 

 

$

2,186

 

Advances to vendors

 

 

6,403

 

 

 

1,806

 

Other receivables

 

 

1,422

 

 

 

1,343

 

Total

 

$

9,344

 

 

$

5,335

 

9.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Machinery, manufacturing and demonstration equipment

 

$

10,866

 

 

$

7,579

 

Computer equipment

 

 

2,187

 

 

 

2,124

 

Furniture

 

 

598

 

 

 

614

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

2,237

 

 

 

2,028

 

Total property and equipment

 

 

15,888

 

 

 

12,345

 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(9,218

)

 

 

(6,573

)

Property and equipment, net

 

$

6,670

 

 

$

5,772

 


As disclosed in Note 17, the Company executed a restructuring plan in May 2016 and disposed of certain long-lived assets, primarily equipment and fixtures related to the SurgiBot System.  The disposal of long-lived assets of $1.0 million is included as a component of restructuring and other charges in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2016.  There were no such disposals for the year ended December 31, 2017 or 2015.

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 
  

(in thousands)

 

Machinery, manufacturing, and demonstration equipment

 $9,089  $8,450 

Operating lease assets - Senhance System leasing

  12,848   10,251 

Computer equipment

  603   600 

Furniture

  715   831 

Leasehold improvements

  1,721   1,654 

Construction in process

  70   436 

Total property and equipment

  25,046   22,222 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (16,087

)

  (12,680

)

Property and equipment, net

 $8,959  $9,542 

 

Depreciation expense was $2,486,000, $1,942,000approximately $3.3 million and $1,248,000,$3.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015,2022, respectively.

 

 

10.

Goodwill, In-Process Research and Development and Intellectual Property

Goodwill

Goodwill of $93.8 million was recorded in connection with the Merger, as described in Note 1, and goodwill of $38.3 million was recorded in connection with the Senhance Acquisition, as described in Note 3. The carrying value of goodwill and the change in the balance for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

130,869

 

Foreign currency translation impact

 

 

(388

)

Impairment loss

 

 

(61,784

)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

68,697

 

Foreign currency translation impact

 

 

2,671

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

71,368

 

Accumulated impairment of goodwill as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $61.8 million.9.Intellectual Property

 

The Company performs an annual impairment test of goodwill at December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicates that the carrying value of the Company’s one reporting unit may not be recoverable. During the second quarter of 2016, the FDA notified the Company that the SurgiBot System did not meet the criteria for substantial equivalency, negatively impacting the Company’s market capitalization, and warranting an interim two-step quantitative impairment test. Prior to adopting ASU 2017-04 as of the beginning of fiscal year 2017, goodwill was tested for impairment using a two-step approach. In the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit was determined and compared to the reporting unit's carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit was less than its carrying value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test was performed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. In the second step, the fair value of the reporting unit was allocated to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination and the purchase price was equivalent to the fair value of the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities was referred to as the implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill was then compared to the actual carrying value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill was less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss was recognized for the difference. ASU 2017-04 removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test.

The Company determined the fair value of the reporting unit using a discounted cash flow analysis derived from the Company’s long-term plans.  The fair value of the reporting unit was corroborated using market prices for TransEnterix, Inc.  The inputs used to determine the fair values were classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Based on the impairment test, the Company recorded goodwill impairment of $61.8 million during the second quarter of 2016. No impairment was recorded as of December 31, 2017 or 2015.

The Company performed a qualitative assessment during the annual impairment review for fiscal 2016 as of December 31, 2016 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the Company’s single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Therefore, the two-step goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit was not necessary at December 31, 2016. During the second quarter of 2017, the Company’s stock price experienced a significant decline. The Company performed a Step 1 goodwill impairment test as of the second quarter and determined that no charge to goodwill for impairment was required during the second quarter of 2017. As of December 31, 2017, the Company elected to bypass the qualitative assessment and calculated the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit, which exceeded the carrying amount. Accordingly, no charge for goodwill impairment was required as of December 31, 2017.


In-Process Research and Development

As described in Note 3, on September 21, 2015, the Company acquired all of the assets related to the Senhance System and recorded $17.1 million of IPR&D. The estimated fair value of the IPR&D was determined using a probability-weighted income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value. The projected cash flows were based on certain key assumptions, including estimates of future revenue and expenses, taking into account the stage of development of the technology at the acquisition date and the time and resources needed to complete development. The Company used a discount rate of 45% and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization, which the Company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions.

On October 13, 2017, upon receipt of regulatory clearance to commercialize the products associated with the IPR&D assets in the United States, the assets were deemed definite-lived, transferred to developed technology and are amortized based on their estimated useful lives.

The carrying value of the Company’s IPR&D assets and the change in the balance for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 is as follows:

In-Process

Research and

Development

(In thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2015

16,511

Foreign currency translation impact

(591

)

Balance at December 31, 2016

15,920

Foreign currency translation impact

1,993

Transfer to developed technology

(17,913

)

Balance at December 31, 2017

$

Intellectual Property

In 2009, the Company purchased certain patents from an affiliated company for $5.0 million in cash and concurrently terminated a license agreement related to the patents. The patent expiration dates begin in 2027. In addition, as described in Note 3, on September 21, 2015, the Company acquired all of the developed technology related to the Senhance System and recorded $48.5 million of intellectual property. The estimated fair value of the intellectual property was determined using a probability-weighted income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value. The projected cash flows were based on certain key assumptions, including estimates of future revenue and expenses, taking into account the stage of development of the technology at the acquisition date and the time and resources needed to complete development. The Company used a discount rate of 45% and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization, which the Company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions.

In November 2016, the Company agreed to enter into a technology and patents purchase agreement with Sofar to acquire from Sofar certain technology and intellectual property rights related to the Senhance Acquisition, and formerly licensed by the Company.  The technology and patents were acquired in 2017 at an acquisition price of $400,000.

As disclosed in Note 17, the Company executed a restructuring plan in May 2016 and wrote-off certain intellectual property consisting of patents related to the SurgiBot System.  The write-off of intellectual property of $1.6 million is included as a component of restructuring and other charges in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive losses for the year ended December 31, 2016.  There were no such write offs for the year ended December 31, 2015 or 2017.


The components of gross intellectual property, accumulated amortization, and net intellectual property as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2023

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

  

Accumulated Amortization

  

Foreign

Currency

Translation

Impact

  

Net Carrying

Amount

 

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Foreign

currency

translation

impact

 

 

Net

Carrying

Amount

 

 

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Foreign

currency

translation

impact

 

 

Write-off

 

 

Net

Carrying

Amount

 

   (in thousands)   

Patents

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

5,000

 

 

$

(3,438

)

 

$

 

 

$

(1,562

)

 

$

 

Developed technology

 

 

66,413

 

 

 

(19,724

)

 

 

5,529

 

 

 

52,218

 

 

 

 

48,500

 

 

 

(8,458

)

 

 

(2,952

)

 

 

 

 

 

37,090

 

 $68,838  $(66,902) $(837) $1,099 

Technology and patents purchased

 

 

400

 

 

 

(30

)

 

 

50

 

 

 

420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  400   (279)  17   138 

Total intellectual property

 

$

66,813

 

 

$

(19,754

)

 

$

5,579

 

 

$

52,638

 

 

 

$

53,500

 

 

$

(11,896

)

 

$

(2,952

)

 

$

(1,562

)

 

$

37,090

 

 $69,238  $(67,181) $(820) $1,237 

  

December 31, 2022

 
  

Gross Carrying Amount

  

Accumulated Amortization

  

Foreign

Currency

Translation

Impact

  

Net Carrying

Amount

 
     (in thousands)    

Developed technology

 $68,838  $(66,562) $(874) $1,402 

Technology and patents purchased

  400   (239)  13   174 

Total intellectual property

 $69,238  $(66,801) $(861) $1,576 

 

The weighted average remaining useful life of the developed technology and technology and patents purchased was 4.83.2 years and 9.33.3 years, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.2023. The weighted average remaining useful life of the developed technology and technology and patents purchased was 4.2 years and 4.3 years, respectively as of December 31, 2022.

 

The estimated future amortization expense of intangible assetsintellectual property as of December 31, 20172023 is as follows (in thousands):

  

Year Ending
December 31, 2023

 

2024

 $388 

2025

  388 

2026

  389 

2027

  72 

Total

 $1,237 

10.Leases

Lessee Information

Components of operating lease expense are primarily recorded in general and administrative on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss were as follows:

 

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2023

   

2022

 
   

(in thousands)

 

Long-term operating

 $1,888   $1,557 

 

 

Years ending

December 31,

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

2018

 

$

10,552

 

2019

 

 

10,552

 

2020

 

 

10,552

 

2021

 

 

10,552

 

2022

 

 

10,210

 

Thereafter

 

 

220

 

Total

 

$

52,638

 

67

 

Supplemental balance sheet information related to operating leases was as follows:

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)

  5.7    6.8  

Weighted-average discount rate

  9.2%    8.4%  

Incremental borrowing rate

 7.1%-23.0%  6.1%-14.5% 

Maturities of finance and operating lease obligations as of December 31, 2023 were as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year

    

2024

 $1,491 

2025

  1,377 

2026

  1,160 

2027

  904 

2028

  834 

Thereafter

  1,406 

Total minimum lease payments

 $7,172 

Less: Amount of lease payments representing interest

  (1,490)

Present value of future minimum lease payments

 $5,682 

 

11.Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

The following table presents the components of accrued expenses and other current liabilities:

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 
  

(in thousands)

 

Consulting and other vendors

 $461  $155 

Royalties

  9   24 

Legal and professional fees

  411   275 

Taxes and other assessments

  755   839 

Total

 $1,636  $1,293 

12.Income Taxes

Income Taxes

The components for the income tax expense (benefit) are as follows for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

 

 

2023

  

2022

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 (in thousands) 

Current income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 $-  $- 

State

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -  - 

Foreign

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 196  239 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -  

Federal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -  - 

State

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -  - 

Foreign

 

 

(3,300

)

 

 

(5,523

)

 

 

(1,024

)

  118   79 

Total income tax expense (benefit)

 

$

(3,300

)

 

$

(5,523

)

 

$

(1,024

)

Total income tax expense

 $314  $318 

 

The United States and foreign components of loss from operations before taxes are as follows for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

 

 

2023

  

2022

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 (in thousands) 

United States

 

$

(124,418

)

 

$

(88,624

)

 

$

(44,438

)

 $(53,226) $(44,802)

Foreign

 

 

(23,678

)

 

 

(36,879

)

 

 

(3,534

)

  (24,893)  (30,441)

Total loss from operations before taxes

 

$

(148,096

)

 

$

(125,503

)

 

$

(47,972

)

 $(78,119) $(75,243)

 


Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2023

  

2022

 

Noncurrent deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (in thousands) 

Deferred Tax assets:

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

2,216

 

 

 

2,300

 

 $3,119  $2,840 

Inventory

 

 

375

 

 

 

204

 

Accrued expenses and other

 

 

637

 

 

 

564

 

 2,666  2,538 

Research credit carryforward

 

 

5,540

 

 

 

4,970

 

 2,859  1,341 

Fixed assets

 

 

450

 

 

 

557

 

 319  162 

Capitalized start-up costs and other intangibles

 

 

2,130

 

 

 

3,586

 

 644  921 

Capitalized research costs

 9,064  4,382 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

64,300

 

 

 

82,298

 

  93,332   83,908 

 

 

75,648

 

 

 

94,479

 

 112,003  96,092 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(71,520

)

 

 

(91,885

)

 (110,511) (94,704)

Net noncurrent deferred tax asset

 

 

4,128

 

 

 

2,594

 

Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed assets

 

 

(334

)

 

 

(292

)

Purchase accounting intangibles

 

 

(12,183

)

��

 

(12,699

)

Net noncurrent deferred tax liability

 

 

(12,517

)

 

 

(12,991

)

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

 

$

(8,389

)

 

$

(10,397

)

Net deferred tax asset

 1,492  1,388 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

Fixed assets and other

 (1,448) (1,214)

Net deferred tax liability

  (1,448)  (1,214)

Net deferred tax asset

 $44  $174 

 

At December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against its net deferred assets in the U.S., Canada, Italy, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and SwissTaiwan tax jurisdiction,jurisdictions, since realization of these benefits is not more likely than not. The valuation allowance decreasedincreased approximately $20.4$15.8 million from the prior year. At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had U.S. federal andnet operating loss carryforwards of $446.7 million, of which $253 million are expected to expire unused under the limitations imposed by Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Of the total amount of Federal NOLs (notwithstanding the 382 limitation), $254.5 million begin to expire in 2027, while the remaining $192.2 million carry forward indefinitely. At December 31, 2023, the Company had U.S. state net operating loss tax carryforwards of approximately $254.6$336.3 million, and $204.8of which $199 million respectively. These net operating loss carryforwardsare expected to expire unused under the state tax law equivalents of Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Of this amount (notwithstanding the 382 limitations), $323.0 million of state NOLs begin to expire in various amounts starting in 2027 and 2022, respectively.2024, while the remaining $13.3 million carry forward indefinitely. At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had federal research credit carryforwards in the amount of $5.5$11.7 million. These carryforwards begin to expire in 2027. However, under the limitations of Internal Revenue Code Section 383, it is expected that $8.8 million of this carryforward will expire unused. The utilization of the federal net operating loss carryforwards and credit carryforwards will depend on the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of the carryforwards. In addition, the maximum annual use of net operating loss and research credit carryforwards is limited in certain situations where changes occur in stock ownership.

At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had foreign operating loss carryforwards in Italy of approximately $15.6$25.0 million, which can be carried forward indefinitely; foreign operating loss carryforwards in Luxembourg of approximately $0.2$95.6 million, which can be carried forward indefinitely; andwill begin to expire in 2034; foreign operating loss carryforwards in Switzerland of approximately $16.7$135.3 million, which begin to expire in 2023.

As of December 31, 2017 the Company has adopted ASU 2016-09 which is effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The ASU requires all excess tax benefits2024, and tax deficiencies to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement in the year in which they occur. As such, the Company has grossed up its netforeign operating loss deferred tax assetcarryforwards in Canada of approximately $1.4 million, which begin to include all excess tax benefits as of December 31, 2017.expire in 2040.

The Company has evaluated its tax positions to consider whether it has any unrecognized tax benefits. As of December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $1.2$0.7 million. Of the total, none would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. The Company does not anticipate a significant change in total unrecognized tax benefits or the Company’s effective tax rate due to the settlement of audits or the expiration of statutes of limitations within the next twelve months. Furthermore, the Company does not expect any cash settlement with the taxing authorities as a result of these unrecognized tax benefits as the Company has sufficient unutilized carryforward attributes to offset the tax impact of these adjustments.

The following is a tabular reconciliation of the Company’s change in gross unrecognized tax positions at December 31 (in thousands):

 

 

2023

  

2022

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 (in thousands) 

Beginning balance

 

$

1,048

 

 

$

862

 

 

$

606

 

 $335  $141 

Gross increases for tax positions related to current periods

 

 

143

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

256

 

 328  194 

Gross increases for tax positions related to prior periods

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross decreases related to 382 limitations

  52   - 

Ending balance

 

$

1,202

 

 

$

1,048

 

 

$

862

 

 $715  $335 

 

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.


The Company has analyzed its filing positions in all significant federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as open tax years in these jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to United States Federal, state, and local tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2014,2020, although carryforward attributes that were generated prior to 20142020 may still be adjusted upon examination by the taxing authorities if they either have been or will be used in a future period. No income tax returns are currently under examination by taxing authorities. The North Carolina Department of Revenue recently completed an examination of the North Carolina state income tax returns for the 2013, 2014, and 2015 tax years for the Company’s subsidiary, TransEnterix Surgical, Inc. No material changes were made as a result of the audit, and those tax years are now effectively settled.

Taxes computed at the then-current statutory federal income tax rate of 34%21% are reconciled to the provision for income taxes as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Pretax

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Pretax

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of Pretax

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Earnings

 

 

Amount

 

 

Earnings

 

 

Amount

 

 

Earnings

 

United States federal tax at statutory rate

 

$

(50,352

)

 

 

34.0

%

 

$

(42,671

)

 

 

34.0

%

 

$

(16,311

)

 

 

34.0

%

State taxes (net of deferred benefit)

 

 

(4,663

)

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

(2,487

)

 

 

2.0

%

 

 

(1,121

)

 

 

2.3

%

Nondeductible expenses

 

 

466

 

 

 

(0.3

%)

 

 

667

 

 

 

(0.5

%)

 

 

1,797

 

 

 

(3.7

%)

Change in fair market value of contingent

   consideration

 

 

777

 

 

 

(0.5

%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant remeasurement and financing costs

 

 

32,348

 

 

 

(21.8

%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research & Development credits

 

 

(712

)

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

(922

)

 

 

0.7

%

 

 

(1,281

)

 

 

2.7

%

Change in unrecognized tax benefits

 

 

142

 

 

 

(0.1

%)

 

 

186

 

 

 

(0.1

%)

 

 

256

 

 

 

(0.5

%)

Foreign tax rate differential

 

 

3,619

 

 

 

(2.4

%)

 

 

3,969

 

 

 

(3.2

%)

 

 

175

 

 

 

(0.4

%)

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

20,816

 

 

 

(16.6

%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in enacted tax rates and other, net

 

 

35,440

 

 

 

(24.1

%)

 

 

(1,069

)

 

 

0.8

%

 

 

532

 

 

 

(1.2

%)

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(20,365

)

 

 

13.8

%

 

 

15,988

 

 

 

(12.7

%)

 

 

14,929

 

 

 

(31.1

%)

Income tax benefit

 

$

(3,300

)

 

 

2.2

%

 

$

(5,523

)

 

 

4.4

%

 

$

(1,024

)

 

 

2.1

%

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Legislation”) was enacted into law, which reduced the US federal corporate income tax rate to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. As a result of the newly enacted tax rate, the Company adjusted its U.S. deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017, by applying the new 21% rate, which resulted in a decrease to the deferred tax assets and a corresponding decrease to the valuation allowance of approximately $36.1 million. The newly enacted tax rate had no impact on deferred tax liabilities as they do not relate to U.S. amounts.

The Tax Legislation also implements a territorial tax system. Under the territorial tax system, in general, the Company's foreign earnings will no longer be subject to tax in the U.S. As part of transition to the territorial tax system the Tax Legislation includes a mandatory deemed repatriation of all undistributed foreign earnings that are subject to a U.S. income tax. The Company estimates that the deemed repatriation will not result in any additional U.S. income tax liability as it estimates it currently has no undistributed foreign earnings.

The SEC staff issued SAB 118 which will allow the Company to record provisional amounts related to accounting for the Tax Legislation during a measurement period which is similar to the measurement period used when accounting for business combinations. The Company is following the guidance set forth by SAB 118 and any amounts calculated are provisional estimates and will be reevaluated as more information or guidance becomes available.  The Company will continue to assess the impact of the Tax Legislation on its business and consolidated financial statements.

  2023  2022 
  

Amount

  

Percent of

Pretax

Earnings

  

Amount

  

Percent of

Pretax

Earnings

 
  (in thousands) 

United States federal tax at statutory rate

 $(16,405)  21.0% $(15,801)  21.0%

State taxes (net of deferred benefit)

  (2,493)  3.2%  (2,912)  3.9%

Nondeductible expenses

  755   (1.0%)  1,077   (1.4%)

Change in fair market value of contingent consideration

  244   (0.3%)  (283)  0.4%

Warrant remeasurement and financing costs

  (140)  0.2%  -   - 

Research & development

  (1,898)  2.4%  (970)  1.3%

Change in unrecognized tax benefits

  380   (0.5%)  194   (0.3%)

Foreign tax rate differential

  3,176   (4.1%)  2,676   (3.6%)

True-up to stock compensation - cancellations

  -   -   49   (0.1%)

Change in enacted tax rates and other, net

  659   (0.8%)  (96)  0.0 

Change in valuation allowance

  16,036   (20.5%)  16,384   (21.8%)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 $314   (0.4%) $318   (0.4%)

 


12.

Accrued Expenses

The following table presents the components of accrued expenses:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Compensation and benefits

 

$

4,533

 

 

$

2,328

 

Taxes and other assessments

 

 

3,192

 

 

 

2,676

 

Consulting and other vendors

 

 

1,414

 

 

 

1,428

 

Deferred rent

 

 

595

 

 

 

323

 

Other

 

 

504

 

 

 

49

 

Legal and professional fees

 

 

386

 

 

 

243

 

Interest and final payment fee

 

 

309

 

 

 

1,000

 

Royalties

 

 

41

 

 

 

159

 

Total

 

$

10,974

 

 

$

8,206

 

13.

Notes Payable

On May 10, 2017, the Company and its domestic subsidiaries, as co-borrowers, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Innovatus Loan Agreement”) with Innovatus Life Sciences Lending Fund I, LP, as Lender and Collateral Agent (the “Lender”).  Under the Innovatus Loan Agreement, the Lender agreed to make certain term loans in the aggregate principal amount of up to $17,000,000. Funding of the first $14,000,000 tranche occurred on May 10, 2017. The Company will be eligible to draw on the Second Tranche of $3,000,000 upon achievement of certain milestones, including Senhance Clearance (as defined below). So long as the Company meets each Interest-Only Milestone (as defined below), the Company is entitled to make interest-only payments for up to twenty-four (24) months. At the end of the interest-only period, the Company will be required to repay the term loans over a two-year period, based on a twenty-four (24) month amortization schedule, with a final maturity date occurring on the fourth anniversary of the initial funding date.  However, the interest-only period will end if the Company fails to meet any Interest-Only Milestone. Commencing on the first day of the month following such failure to achieve an Interest-Only Milestone, the Company will be required to repay the term loans over a two year period, based on a twenty-four (24) month amortization schedule.  The Interest-Only Milestones require the Company to (i) achieve certain twelve month revenue targets, measured quarterly, commencing with the quarter ending March 31, 2018, (ii) meet a minimum capital raising threshold through the sale and issuance of equity securities during the period from April 10, 2017 through May 31, 2018 and (iii) obtain clearance for commercialization of the Senhance System by the FDA (“Senhance Clearance”) by May 30, 2018 (each such milestone, an “Interest-Only Milestone”).13.Stock-Based Compensation

 

The term loans bear interest at a fixed rate equal to 11% per annum, of which 2.5% can be paid in-kind and added to the outstanding principal amount of the term loans until the earlier of (i) the first anniversary following the funding date and (ii) the Company’s failure to achieve an Interest-Only Milestone.  The Company will be required to repay the term loans if they are accelerated following an event of default.  In addition, the Company is permitted to prepay the term loans in full at any time upon five (5) business days’ written notice to the Lender.  Upon the earliest to occur of the maturity date, acceleration of the term loan, or prepayment of the term loan, the Company is required to make a final payment equal to the total term loan commitment multiplied by four percent (4%) (the “Final Fee”); provided, however, that in the event the Company refinances its obligations with the Lender after Senhance Clearance, no Final Fee or Prepayment Fee (as defined below) will be due thereunder; and provided, further, that if the Company elects to refinance its obligations prior to the funding of the Second Tranche, the Final Fee with respect to the Second Tranche shall be paid in full on the date of such refinancing. Any prepayment of the term loans in full, whether mandatory or voluntary, must include (i) the Final Fee, (ii) interest at the default rate (which is the rate otherwise applicable plus five percent (5%)) with respect to any amounts past due, (iii) the Lender’s expenses and all other obligations that are due and payable to the Lender and (iv) a prepayment fee of three percent (3%) if the term loan is paid in full on or before the first anniversary of the effective date, two percent (2%) if paid off after the first anniversary but on or before the second anniversary of the effective date and one percent (1%) if paid off after the second anniversary but on or before the third anniversary of the effective date (the “Prepayment Fee”).

In connection with the funding, the Company paid a facility fee of $170,000 on the date of funding of the first tranche and incurred additional debt issuance costs of approximately $1.2 million, recorded as debt discount.  In addition, the Company issued warrants to the Lender to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock.  Additional warrants will be issued on the funding date of each subsequent tranche and will expire five (5) years from such issue date. The warrants issued in connection with funding of the first tranche entitle the Lender to purchase up to 1,244,746 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The Company estimated the fair value of the warrants to be $300,000. The value of the warrants was classified as equity and recorded as a discount to the loan.  The debt discount is amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the loan. As of December 31, 2017, the unamortized debt discount was $209,000.


The Company’s obligations under the Innovatus Loan Agreement are secured by a security interest in all of the assets of the Company and its current and future domestic and material foreign subsidiaries, including a security interest in the intellectual property.  The Innovatus Loan Agreement contains customary representations and covenants that, subject to exceptions, restrict the Company’s ability to do the following things: declare dividends or redeem or repurchase equity interests; incur additional liens; make loans and investments; incur additional indebtedness; engage in mergers, acquisitions, and asset sales; transact with affiliates; undergo a change in control; add or change business locations; and engage in businesses that are not related to its existing business. Under the terms of the Innovatus Loan Agreement, the Company is required to maintain minimum unrestricted cash in an amount equal to (x) six million dollars ($6,000,000), at all times prior to Senhance Clearance; and (y) at all times thereafter, the least of (i) $6,000,000, (ii) the Company’s trailing three (3) months’ cash used to fund operating activities, as determined as of the most recent month end and (iii) the then outstanding principal amount of the term loans, together with accrued but unpaid interest.

As of December 31, 2017 future principal payments, including paid in-kind interest, under the Innovatus Loan Agreement are as follows:

Years ending December 31,

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

2018

 

$

4,788

 

2019

 

 

7,181

 

2020

 

 

2,394

 

Total

 

$

14,363

 

In connection with its entrance into the Innovatus Loan Agreement, the Company repaid its existing credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank and Oxford Finance LLC (the “Prior Lenders”), which loan and security agreement, as subsequently amended and restated is referred to as the “SVB Loan Agreement.” The Company recognized a loss of $308,000 on the extinguishment of notes payable for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is included in interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company paid $1.3 million in final payment obligations and $255,000 in facility fees under the SVB Loan Agreement upon repayment.

The SVB Loan Agreement was initially entered into on January 17, 2012. In connection with the Merger, the Company assumed and became the borrower under the SVB Loan Agreement.

Incentive Compensation Plan Information

 

On August 14, 2015,June 6, 2023, at the Company entered into the First Amendment to the SVB Loan Agreement (the “First Amendment”) with the Prior Lenders. The first tranche2023 Annual Meeting of the First Amendment increasedStockholders, the Company’s borrowings at August 14, 2015 from $10,000,000stockholders voted to $20,000,000. The First Amendment allowed for interest-only payments at 7.5% per annum through April 30, 2016approve an amendment and had a maturity date of October 1, 2018.

On September 18, 2015, in connection with entry into the Purchase Agreement with Sofar S.p.A. (see Note 3 for a description of the related transactions), the Company and the Prior Lenders entered into the Consent and Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the SVB Loan Agreement. The Second Amendment modified the period in which the Company could make interest-only payments at 7.5% per annum on the term loans until January 31, 2016. The Second Amendment had a maturity date of July 1, 2018.

In addition, in connection with the borrowings under the SVB Loan Agreement, the Company issued warrants to the Prior Lenders to purchase sharesrestatement of the Company’s common stock amounting to an aggregate of 430,815 warrants under the SVB Loan Agreement. The warrants expire seven years from their respective issue date.

In accordance with ASC 470-50 Debt – Modifications and Extinguishments, it was determined that a debt refinancing of the SVB Loan Agreement on September 26, 2014, was considered to be a debt modification. Accordingly, the Company recorded approximately $129,000 of debt discount, consisting of the $75,000 facility fee and the relative fair value of warrants on the issue date of $54,000. Additionally, approximately $30,000 of legal fees was recorded as a result of the transaction. The debt discount and deferred financing costs were amortized over the life of the new debt agreement using the effective interest method into interest expense, net, until the debt was extinguished in May 2017.

In accordance with ASC 470-50 DebtModifications and Extinguishments, it was determined that debt refinancings of the SVB Loan Agreement on August 14, 2015, September 18, 2015, April 19, 2016 and September 7, 2016 were considered to be debt modifications. The Company recorded a debt discount of approximately $210,000 for these amendments. Accordingly, the unamortized debt discount was presented as a reduction of the related debt liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The debt discount was amortized over the life of the new debt agreement using the effective interest method into interest expense, net, until the debt was extinguished in May 2017.


In connection with the issuance of the notes payable and amendments under the SVB Loan Agreement, TransEnterix Surgical incurred approximately $371,000 in debt issuance costs paid to the Prior Lenders and third parties and $280,000 in debt issuance costs related to issuance of warrants to the Prior Lenders. The unamortized balance of $107,000 as of December 31, 2016, was amortized using the effective interest method, until the debt was extinguished in May 2017. At the time of extinguishment in May 2017, $63,000 of unamortized debt issuance costs were included in the loss on extinguishment of notes payable.

14.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company’s stock-based compensation plans include the TransEnterix, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan previously named (“the TransEnterix, Inc. 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), as well as options outstanding under the TransEnterix, Inc. Stock Option Plan (the “2006 Plan”). As part of the Merger, options outstanding, whether vested or unvested, under the 2006 Plan were adjusted by the Exchange Ratio of 1.1533, and assumed by the Company concurrent with the closing of the Merger.

The Plan was initially approved by the majority of the stockholders on November 13, 2007. The Plan was amended on June 19, 2012 to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance to 1,000,000 and was amended on October 29, 2013 to (a) increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the Plan from 1,000,000 shares of common stock to 4,940,000 shares of common stock, (b) increase the per-person award limitations for options or stock appreciation rights from 200,000 to 1,000,000 shares and for restricted stock, deferred stock, performance shares and/or other stock-based awards from 100,000 to 500,000 shares, and (c) change the name of the Plan to reflect the Merger-related change. The Plan was again amended on May 7, 2015 to (i) increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 11,940,000 shares; (ii) extend the termby 22,000,000 shares. As of the Plan until May 7, 2025;December 31, 2023, there were 54,072,307 shares authorized for issuance, and (iii) make other changes and updates to the Plan and was further amended in October 2015 to add French Sub-Plan amendments applicable to awards made to France-based employees. The Plan was further amended on June 8, 2016 to (a) approve an increase in the number of22,185,899 shares reservedavailable for future issuance under the Plan to 18,940,000 shares and (b) establish maximumPlan. To date all equity award limits for initial awards and annual awards to non-employee directors. The Plan was subsequently amended as of May 25, 2017, increasing the number of shares of Common Stock authorized under the Plan to 25,940,000.have consisted of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock units and stock awards.

The October 2013, May 2015, June 2016 and May 2017 amendments were approved by the Board of Directors and stockholders; the French Sub-Plan was approved by the Board of Directors.

Under the Plan, which is administered by the Compensation Committee, the Company may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and/units, restricted stock or deferred stock awards to employees, officers, non-employee directors, consultants, and vendors. The exercise price of stock options or stock appreciation rights may not be less than the fair market value of the Company’s shares at the date of grant. Additionally, no stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under the Plan may have a term exceeding ten years.

Stock Options

The 2006 Plan was adopted and approved by stockholders in September 2006 and providedfollowing table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity, including grants to non-employees, for the grantingyear ended December 31, 2023:

  

Number of

Shares

  

Weighted-

Average Exercise

Price

  

Weighted-Average

Remaining

Contractual Term

(Years)

 

Balance at December 31, 2022

  7,584,967  $4.22   5.31 

Granted

  3,047,615   0.71     

Forfeited

  (149,430)  0.78     

Cancelled

  (25,173)  27.32     

Exercised

  (13,300)  0.38     

Balance at December 31, 2023

  10,444,679  $3.20   4.80 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of up to 80,000 stock options to employees, directors, and consultants. Under the 2006 Plan, both employees and non-employees were eligible for such stock options. In 2009, the 2006 Plan was amended to increase the total options pool to 1,110,053. In 2011, the 2006 Plan was amended to increase the total options pool to 3,378,189. The amendments were approved by the Board of Directors and stockholders. The Board of Directors had the authority to administer the plan and determine, among other things, the exercise price, term and dates of the exercise of all options at their grant date. Under the 2006 Plan, options become vested generally over four years, and expire not more than 10 years after the date of grant. As part of the Merger, options outstanding under the 2006 Plan were adjusted by the Conversion Ratio, and remain in existence as options of TransEnterix.

During$0.59 during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015, the Company recognized $7,078,000, $5,033,000 and $3,311,000, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense, including stock options and restricted stock units.

2022. The Company recognizes as expense, the grant-date fairaggregate intrinsic value of stock options and other stock based compensation issued to employees and non-employee directors over the requisite service periods, which are typically the vesting periods. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton model to estimate the fair value of its stock-based payments. The volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes-Merton model is based on the calculated historical volatility based on an analysis of reported data for a peer group of companies as well asexercised under the Company’s historical volatility. stock plans was not material during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

The expected term offollowing table summarizes information about stock options granted by the Company has been determined based upon the simplified method, because the Company does not have sufficient historical information regarding its options to derive the expected term. Under this approach, the expected term is the mid-point between the weighted average of vesting period and the contractual term. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury rates whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. The Company has not paid and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its shares of common stock; therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero. The Company estimates forfeitures based on the historical experience of the Company and adjusts the estimated forfeiture rate based upon actual experience.outstanding at December 31, 2023:


  

Number of

Shares

  

Weighted-

Average Exercise

Price

  

Weighted-Average Remaining

Contractual Term (Years)

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic Value (Millions)

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2023

  5,726,280  $5.02   4.12  $- 

Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2023

  10,105,084  $3.28   4.77  $- 

The fair value of options granted were estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model based on the assumptions in the table below:

 

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2023  2022 

Expected dividend yield

  0%    0%  

Expected volatility

 124%-130%  126%-133% 

Risk-free interest rate

 3.53%-4.14%  1.25%-4.40% 

Expected life (in years)

 3.8-4.5  3.8-4.5 

Restricted Stock Units

The following is a summary of the restricted stock unit activity, including performance restricted stock units, for the year ended December 31, 2023:

  

Number of

Restricted Stock

Units Outstanding

  

Weighted-Average

Grant Date Fair

Value

 

Unvested December 31, 2022

  8,483,491  $1.04 

Granted

  8,616,931   0.70 

Vested

  (3,937,130)  1.10 

Forfeited

  (837,115)  0.76 

Unvested December 31, 2023

  12,326,177  $0.81 

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Expected dividend yield

 

 

0%

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

0%

 

Expected volatility

 

70% - 72%

 

 

47%

 

 

45% - 56%

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

1.84% - 2.29%

 

 

1.13% - 2.09%

 

 

1.44% - 1.95%

 

Expected life (in years)

 

5.5 - 6.3

 

 

5.5 - 6.3

 

 

5.5 - 6.3

 

71

Performance Restricted Stock Units

In 2023 and 2022, the Company granted performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”). The number of shares earnable under the 2023 and 2022 awards were based on achieving certain operational targets by December 31, 2023 (for the PRSUs granted in 2023) and October 1, 2023 (for the PRSUs granted in 2022), respectively. In February 2024, the Board determined that the operational targets for PRSU awards granted in 2023 were 50% achieved and as a result, the 2023 PRSUs were 50% earned and remain subject to three-year time-based vesting requirements. The other 50% of the 2023 PRSUs were forfeited. The operational targets were achieved for the PRUSs granted in 2022, therefore the 2022 PRSUs were fully earned and remain subject to three-year time-based vesting requirements.

Stock-based Compensation Expense

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity, including grants to non-employees,non-cash stock-based compensation expense by award type for the year ended December 31, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

Remaining

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Average

 

 

Contractual

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Exercise Price

 

 

Term (Years)

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

 

12,488,551

 

 

$

2.66

 

 

 

8.08

 

Granted

 

 

4,746,250

 

 

 

1.25

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(574,773

)

 

 

2.35

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled

 

 

(227,419

)

 

 

4.16

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(738,934

)

 

 

0.59

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

15,693,675

 

 

$

2.32

 

 

 

7.78

 

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

Remaining

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Average

 

 

Contractual

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Exercise Price

 

 

Term (Years)

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2017

 

 

7,113,007

 

 

$

2.78

 

 

 

6.78

 

Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2017

 

 

15,195,280

 

 

$

2.34

 

 

 

7.75

 

The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding, exercisable, and vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2017 was approximately $5.2 million, $1.6 million, and $4.9 million, respectively. This amount is before applicable income taxes and represents the closing market price of the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2017 less the exercise price, multiplied by the number of stock options that had an exercise price that is less than the closing market price. This amount represents the amount that would have been received by the optionees had these stock options been exercised on that date.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $2,179,000, $519,000 and $1,603,000, respectively.

The Company granted 4,746,250, 5,368,755 and 4,407,758 options to employees and non-employees during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, and 2015, respectively, with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $0.82, $1.30 and $1.37, respectively.2022:

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2023

   

2022

 
  

(in thousands)

 

Stock options

 $2,338   $3,654 

Restricted stock units

  3,954    3,319 

Performance restricted stock units

  1,626    1,443 
  $7,918   $8,416 

As of December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had future employeeunrecognized stock-based compensation expense of approximately $8,457,000 related to unvested share awards,stock options was approximately $1.6 million, which is expected to be recognized over an estimated weighted-average period of 2.51.4 years.

15.

Restricted Stock Units

In 2015, 2016 and 2017, the Company issued Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) to certain employees which vest over three years. The RSUs vest on defined vesting dates, subject to the continuous service with the Company at the applicable vesting event. Vesting can be accelerated by upon a change in control under the Plan if the RSUs are not assumed by the successor company.  When vested, the RSUs represent the right to be issued the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that is equal to the number of RSUs granted. The fair value of each RSU is estimated based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. Share-based compensation expense related to RSUs is recognized over the requisite service period as adjusted for estimated forfeitures.


The following is a summary of the RSU activity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Restricted

 

 

Grant

 

 

 

Stock Units

 

 

Date Fair

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Value

 

Unvested, December 31, 2014

 

 

140,000

 

 

$

7.19

 

Granted

 

 

380,000

 

 

 

2.94

 

Vested

 

 

(70,000

)

 

 

7.19

 

Forfeited

 

 

(27,500

)

 

 

2.94

 

Unvested, December 31, 2015

 

 

422,500

 

 

$

3.64

 

Granted

 

 

660,331

 

 

 

3.74

 

Vested

 

 

(187,503

)

 

 

4.53

 

Unvested, December 31, 2016

 

 

895,328

 

 

$

3.53

 

Granted

 

 

3,873,000

 

 

 

0.82

 

Vested

 

 

(337,618

)

 

 

3.46

 

Forfeited

 

 

(36,054

)

 

 

3.60

 

Unvested, December 31, 2017

 

 

4,394,656

 

 

$

1.15

 

As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded approximately $1,751,000, $1,463,000 and $816,000, respectively, in compensation expense for the RSUs. As of December 31, 2017,2023, the unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested RSUsrestricted stock units and performance restricted stock units was approximately $3.2$4.4 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.31.2 years. The weighted average grant date fair value of the RSUs granted in 2015 was $2.94. The weighted average grant date fair value of the RSUs granted in 2016 was $3.74. The weighted average grant date fair value of the RSUs granted in 2017 was $0.82.

14.Equity Offerings

 

16.

Warrants

On March 22, 2013, SafeStitch entered into a stock purchase agreement with approximately 17 investors (the “2013 PIPE Investors”) pursuant to which the 2013 PIPE Investors purchased an aggregate of approximately 2,420,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.25 per shareEquity financing transactions for aggregate consideration of approximately $3.0 million. Included in this private placement was the issuance of warrants to purchase approximately 1,209,600 common shares, representing one warrant for every two common shares purchased, with an exercise price of $1.65 per share and five year expiration. Among the 2013 PIPE Investors purchasing shares were related parties who purchased 1.28 million shares and received 640,000 warrants. There were approximately 1.2 million warrants outstanding that were assumed as of the Merger. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 240,000 of these warrants were exercised. During the years ended December 31, 20162023 and 2015, none of these warrants were exercised.  

On January 17, 2012, TransEnterix Surgical entered into the original Loan Agreement with the Prior Lenders. Pursuant to such agreement, TransEnterix Surgical issued preferred stock warrants to the Prior Lenders on January 17, 2012 and December 21, 2012, respectively, to purchase shares of TransEnterix Surgical preferred stock. The preferred stock warrants expire 10 years from the issue date. The preferred stock warrants were remeasured immediately prior to the Merger. As of the Merger, the preferred stock warrants converted to common stock warrants, adjusted based on a Merger exchange ratio of 1.1533, and the preferred stock warrant liability was reclassified to additional paid-in capital. These warrants are exercisable for an aggregate of approximately 279,588 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $1.45 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2013, 139,794 of these warrants were exercised in a cashless transaction for 112,766 shares of common stock. None of these warrants were exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.

On September 26, 2014, the Company entered into an amendment to the SVB Loan Agreement with the Prior Lenders. In connection with the first tranche borrowings under such amendment, the Company issued 38,324 common stock warrants to the Prior Lenders to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, with an exercise price of $4.015 per share. The warrants expire seven years from their respective issue date. The Company concluded that the warrants are considered equity instruments. The warrants were recognized at the relative fair value on the issuance date as a debt discount and will be amortized using the effective interest method from issuance to the maturity of the term loans. None of these warrants were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.

On August 14, 2015, in connection with an amendment to the SVB Loan Agreement and first tranche borrowings thereunder, the Company issued 112,903 common stock warrants to the Prior Lenders to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, with an exercise price of $3.10 per share. The warrants expire seven years from their respective issue date. The Company concluded that the warrants are considered equity instruments. The warrants were recognized at the relative fair value on the issuance date as a debt discount and will be amortized using the effective interest method from issuance to the maturity of the note. None of these warrants were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.


On April 28, 2017, the Company sold 24.9 million Units, each consisting of one share of Common Stock, a Series A Warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per share, and a Series B Warrant to purchase 0.75 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per share at an offering price of $1.00 per Unit.  Each Series A Warrant may be exercised at any time beginning on the date of issuance, and from time to time thereafter, through and including the first anniversary of the issuance date, unless terminated earlier as provided in the Series A Warrant. Receipt of 510(k) clearance for the Senhance System on October 13, 2017, triggered the acceleration of the expiration date of the Series A Warrants to October 31, 2017. All of the Series A Warrants were exercised prior to the expiration date.

Each Series B Warrant has an initial exercise price of $1.00 per share and may be exercised at any time beginning on the date of issuance and from time to time thereafter through and including the fifth anniversary of the issuance date.

The exercise prices and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of each of the Series B Warrants are subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including, but not limited to, stock splits or dividends, business combinations, sale of assets, similar recapitalization transactions, or other similar transactions. The Series B Warrants are subject to adjustment in the event that the Company issues or is deemed to issue shares of Common Stock for less than the then applicable exercise prices of each of the Series B Warrants. The exercisability of the Series B Warrants may be limited if, upon exercise, the holder or any of its affiliates would beneficially own more than 4.99% of the Common Stock. If, at any time Series B Warrants are outstanding, any fundamental transaction occurs, as described in the Series B Warrants and generally including any consolidation or merger into another corporation, the consummation of a transaction whereby another entity acquires more than 50% of the Company’s outstanding voting stock, or the sale of all or substantially all of its assets, the successor entity must assume in writing all of the obligations to the Series B Warrant holders. Additionally, in the event of a fundamental transaction, each Series B Warrant holder will have the right to require the Company, or its successor, to repurchase the Series B Warrants for an amount of cash equal to the Black-Scholes value of the remaining unexercised portion of such Series B Warrants. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 8,893,700 Series B Warrants were exercised.   

On May 10, 2017, in connection with the entry into the Innovatus Loan Agreement, the Company issued warrants to the Lender to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock.  The warrants are issued on the funding date of each tranche and will expire five (5) years from such issue date. The warrants issued in connection with funding of the first tranche will entitle the Lender to purchase up to 1,244,746 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. None of these warrants were exercised as of December 31, 2017.

On September 12, 2017, the Company entered into a service agreement with a third party vendor. In connection with the service agreement, the Company issued 950,000 common stock warrants (“Service Warrants”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, with an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The Service Warrants vest as follow: (a) twenty-five percent (25%) on the date of execution of the services agreement; (b) fifty percent (50%) upon completion of hiring the sales team; and (c) the remaining twenty-five percent (25%) upon achieving cumulative product revenue of $15.0 million. The Service Warrants expire ten years from their issue date. The Company concluded that the Service Warrants are considered equity instruments. The fair value of the Service Warrants on the issuance date was determined using a Black-Scholes Merton model. The initial expense of $0.6 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017.  The fair value of the remaining Service Warrants will be updated each reporting period and the expense will be recorded over the service period. None of these warrants were exercised as of December 31, 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Remaining

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Exercise

 

 

Contractual

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Warrants

 

 

Price

 

 

Life (in years)

 

 

Fair Value

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

 

 

1,313,719

 

 

$

1.70

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

$

1.75

 

Granted

 

 

112,903

 

 

 

3.10

 

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

0.86

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

 

 

1,426,622

 

 

$

1.81

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

$

1.54

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

 

1,426,622

 

 

$

1.81

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

$

1.54

 

Granted

 

 

45,769,746

 

 

 

1.00

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

0.22

 

Exercised

 

 

(34,033,700

)

 

 

1.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

13,162,668

 

 

$

1.08

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

$

0.39

 


The aggregate intrinsic value of the common stock warrants in the above table was $11.2 million, $0 and $1.0 million at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value is before applicable income taxes and is calculated based on the difference between the exercise price of the warrants and the estimated fair market value of the applicable stock as of the respective dates.2022, include:

 

 

17.

Restructuring

On April 19, 2016, the FDA notified the Company that the SurgiBot System did not meet the criteria for substantial equivalence based on the data submitted in the 510(k) submission. In May 2016, the Company implemented a restructuring plan.  Under the restructuring plan, the Company reduced headcount, discontinued efforts on the SurgiBot System, and cancelled certain contracts.  The restructuring charges amounted to $5.7 million, of which $2.6 million was included as inventory write down related to restructuring and $3.1 million was included as restructuring and other charges in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, during the second quarter of 2016.

The restructuring and other charges of $3.1 million included: (i) $0.5 million to be paid in cash, of which $0.4 million related to employee severance costs and $0.1 million related to cancellation of certain contracts; and (ii) $2.6 million for other non-cash charges, of which $1.0 million related to the disposal of long-lived assets for the abandonment of certain equipment and tooling directly relating to the SurgiBot System and $1.6 million related to the write-off of intellectual property for certain patents also relating to the SurgiBot System. There were no future payments under the restructuring plan as of December 31, 2017 or 2016.

18.

Purchase Agreement, Controlled Equity Offering and Public Offering of Common Stock

On April 28, 2017, the Company sold 24.9 million units, each consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock, a Series A warrant to purchase one share of common stock, and a Series B warrant to purchase 0.75 shares of common stock, at a public offering price of $1.00 per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of $24.9 million in an underwritten firm commitment public offering. Net proceeds after issuance costs were $23.2 million, assuming no exercise of the warrants. The closing of the public offering occurred on May 3, 2017.

On December 16, 2016, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the “LPC Purchase Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC, (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant to which the Company had the right to sell to Lincoln Park up to an aggregate of $25.0 million in shares of the Company’s common stock, (the “Common Stock”), subject to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the LPC Purchase Agreement. The Company issued to Lincoln Park 345,421 shares of Common Stock as commitment shares in consideration for the LPC Purchase Agreement through April 27, 2017. Sales under the LPC Purchase Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2016 were 300,000 shares, with gross proceeds of $412,500 and net proceeds of $392,500. Sales under the LPC Purchase Agreement for the year ended December 31, 2017 were 3,972,741 shares, with gross and net proceeds of $5,304,000. Effective April 27, 2017, the Company terminated the LPC Purchase Agreement. The LPC Purchase Agreement provided the Company with an election to terminate the Purchase Agreement for any reason or for no reason by delivering a notice to Lincoln Park, and the Company did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the LPC Purchase Agreement.2022At-The-Market Offering

 

On June 11, 2015, the Company sold 16,666,667 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $3.00 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $50.0 million in an underwritten firm commitment public offering. Net proceeds after issuance costs were $46.4 million. The closing of the public offering occurred on June 17, 2015. The Company granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock.

On July 10, 2015, the underwriters exercised a portion of their option to acquire an additional 2,075,000 shares at the public offering price of $3.00 per share for aggregate additional gross proceeds of $6.2 million. Net proceeds after issuance costs were $5.8 million. The purchase of the option shares closed on July 15, 2015. Total proceeds (including the option) were $52.2 million, net of issuance costs of $4.0 million. The common stock was offered and sold pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement filed in November 2014 (the “November 2014 Shelf Registration Statement”), which was declared effective on December 19, 2014. The November 2014 Shelf Registration Statement allowed the Company to raise up to $100.0 million through the sale of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants, or any combination thereof. On March 3, 2016, the Company filed an amendment to the November 2014 Shelf Registration Statement increasing the amount available from $100.0 million to $150.0 million.

On February 20, 2015,18, 2022, the Company entered into a Controlled Equity Offering SM Sales Agreement (the “2015“2022 Sales Agreement”) with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“Cantor”)and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., as sales agent,collectively, “the Agents”. The Company commenced an at-the-market offering (the “2022 ATM Offering”) pursuant to which the Company sold through Cantor,could offer and sell, from time to time, at its option, shares of its common stock for an aggregate offering price of up to $25.0 million in shares of common stock in an at-the-market offering.$100.0 million. The Company pays Cantor a commission of approximately 3%aggregate compensation payable to the Agents was 3.0% of the aggregate gross proceeds received from all saleseach sale of the Company’s common stockstock. No shares were sold under the Sales Agreement. Sales under the 2015 Sales Agreement have been fully sold as of February 9, 2016, with cumulative shares of 7,724,488, gross proceeds of $25.0 million and net proceeds of $24.0 million.


On February 9, 2016, the Company entered into a Controlled Equity2022 ATM Offering SM Sales Agreement (the “2016 Sales Agreement”) with Cantor, as sales agent, pursuant to which the Company can sell through Cantor, from time to time, up to $43.6 million in shares of common stock in an at-the-market offering. The Company pays Cantor a commission of approximately 3% of the aggregate gross proceeds received from all sales of common stock under the 2016 Sales Agreement.2022.

On August 31, 2017, the Company entered into an At-the-Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement (the “2017 Sales Agreement”) with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (“Stifel”), as sales agent, pursuant to which the Company can sell through Stifel, from time to time, up to $50.0 million in shares of common stock in an at-the-market offering. The Company pays Stifel a commission of approximately 3% of the aggregate gross proceeds received from all sales of common stock under the 2017 Sales Agreement. Unless otherwise terminated earlier, the 2017 Sales Agreement continues until all shares available under the Sales Agreement have been sold.

The following table summarizespresents details about common stock issued pursuant to the total sales under the 2015 Sales Agreement, 2016 Sales Agreement and the 2017 Sales Agreement for the periods indicated2022 ATM Offering (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

 

  

Year Ended

December 31, 2023

 

Total shares of common stock sold

  933,672 

Average price per share

 $0.43 

Gross proceeds

 $403 

Commission paid to agents

 $12 

Net proceeds

 $391 

 

2017 Sales

Agreement

 

 

2016 Sales

Agreement

 

 

2015 Sales

Agreement

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2017

 

 

Year  Ended

December 31,

2016

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2016

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2015

 

Total shares of common stock sold

 

15,998.5

 

 

 

8,763.4

 

 

 

5,710.2

 

 

 

2,014.3

 

Average price per share

$

3.13

 

 

$

4.70

 

 

$

3.23

 

 

$

3.25

 

Gross proceeds

$

50,000

 

 

$

41,156

 

 

$

18,454

 

 

$

6,546

 

Commissions earned by Cantor

$

1,500

 

 

$

1,235

 

 

$

553

 

 

$

197

 

Other issuance costs

$

97

 

 

$

185

 

 

$

 

 

$

259

 

72

 

2023 Registered Equity Offering

On July 27, 2023, the Company sold, in a registered direct offering, an aggregate of 23,809,524 shares of common stock, and warrants to purchase 23,809,524 of the Company’s common stock shares at an exercise price of $0.42 per common share (the “warrants”), for an aggregate purchase price of $10.0 million. The warrants are exercisable at any time on or after the date of issuance and will expire five years after the date of issuance. Based on the assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480 – Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity and ASC 815 – Derivatives and Hedging, the Company determined that warrants did not meet the requirements for equity classification. Accordingly, the warrants were recorded as a liability on the Company’s balance sheet at their initial estimated fair value on the date of issuance. For additional information regarding the fair value of warrant liabilities, please refer to Note 4 – Fair Value Measurements.

The Company allocated $7.1 million of the aggregate proceeds to warrants based on their estimated fair value, with the residual amount of $2.9 million allocated to common stock. Offering related issuance costs were approximately $1.0 million and consisted primarily of placement agent’s fees and legal expenses. Issuance costs were allocated to common stock and warrant liability proportionally to the allocation of the purchase price. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded $0.7 million of other expense, net, in the consolidated statement of operations related to issuance costs allocated to warrant liabilities.

 

19.

15.Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share

Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed giving effect to all potential dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Diluted potentialPotential dilutive common shares consist of incremental shares issuable upon exercise of stock options, warrants and restricted stock units. In computing diluted net loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,units, and 2015, no adjustment haswarrants. No adjustments have been made to the weighted average outstanding common shares figures for the years ended December 31, 2023 or 2022 as the assumed exercise of outstanding options, warrants and restricted stock units would be anti-dilutive.

Potential common shares not included in calculating diluted net loss per share are as follows:

 

  

December 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

Stock options

  10,444,679   7,584,967 

Nonvested restricted stock units

  12,326,177   8,483,491 

Stock warrants

  24,830,500   1,021,076 

Total

  47,601,356   17,089,534 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Stock options

 

 

15,693,675

 

 

 

12,488,551

 

 

 

8,300,819

 

Stock warrants

 

 

13,162,668

 

 

 

1,426,622

 

 

 

1,426,622

 

Nonvested restricted stock units

 

 

4,394,656

 

 

 

895,328

 

 

 

422,500

 

Total

 

 

33,250,999

 

 

 

14,810,501

 

 

 

10,149,941

 

16.Commitments and Contingencies

 

20.

Related Person Transactions

Synergy Life Science Partners, L.P.License and Synecor, LLC collectively owned approximately 2.9% and 5%Supply Agreements

As part of the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. A memberacquisition of the Company’s Board of Directors is managing partner of Synergy Life Science Partners, L.P. and an executive officer of Synecor, LLC. Various research and development services were purchased by the Company from Synecor, LLC and its wholly owned subsidiary Synchrony Labs LLC pursuant to arms’ length terms approved by the Audit Committee and totaled approximately $0, $5,000 and $435,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

On September 18, 2015, TransEnterix Italia entered into a services agreement for receipt of administrative services from Sofar and payment of rent to Sofar, a stockholder that owned approximately 9.7% and 13% of the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Expenses under this agreement were approximately $55,000, $232,000 and $89,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The services agreement terminatedSenhance System in 2017.


In November 2016, the Company agreed to enter into a technology and patents purchase agreement with Sofar to acquire from Sofar certain technology and intellectual property rights related to the Senhance Acquisition, and formerly licensed by the Company.  The acquisition price was $400,000.

As discussed in Note 3, in September 2015, the Company completed assumed certain license and supply agreements. The Company has purchase orders with various suppliers for certain tooling, supplies, contract engineering and research services. Commitments related to license agreements and purchase orders are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year

    

2024

 $3,263 

2025

  300 

2026

  320 

Total commitments

 $3,883 

17.Segments and Geographic Areas

The Company operates in one business segment—the Senhance Acquisition using a combinationresearch, development, and sale of cash, stock and potential post-acquisition milestone payments. On December 30, 2016,medical devices to improve MIS. The Company’s chief operating decision maker (determined to be the Chief Executive Officer) does not manage any part of the Company entered into an Amendment toseparately, and the Senhance Acquisition purchase agreement with Sofar to restructure the termsallocation of the Second Trancheresources and assessment of the Cash Consideration. Under the Amendment, the Second Tranche was restructured to reduce the contingent cash consideration by €5.0 million in exchange for the issuance of 3,722,685 shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate fair market value of €5.0 million.  On January 4, 2017, the Company issued to Sofar 3,722,685 shares of the common stock with a fair value of €5.0 million. The price per share was $1.404 and was calculatedperformance are based on the average ofCompany’s consolidated operating results.

The following table presents consolidated assets and long-lived assets by geographic area, which includes property and equipment, intellectual property, and operating lease assets:

  

December 31, 2023

 
  

Long-Lived Assets

  

Total Assets

 

US

  29%  46%

EMEA

  68%  52%

Asia

  3%  2%

Total

  100%  100%

  

December 31, 2022

 
  

Long-Lived Assets

  

Total Assets

 

US

  35%  72%

EMEA

  62%  27%

Asia

  3%  1%

Total

  100%  100%

The following table presents sales by geographic area based on the closing prices ofcountry in which the Company’s common stock on ten consecutive trading days ending one day before the execution of the Amendment.customer is based.

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2023

  

2022

 

US

  8%  11%

EMEA

  82%  77%

Asia

  10%  12%

Total

  100%  100%

18.Related Party Transactions

In March 2018, TransEnterixAsensus Surgical Europe S.à r.l. entered into a Service Supply Agreement with 1Med1 Med S.A. for certain regulatory consulting services. Andrea Biffi, a current member of the Company’s Board of Directors, owns a non-controlling interest in 1Med1 Med S.A. Expenses under the Service Supply Agreement were approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

 

21.

Commitments and Contingencies

Contingent Consideration

As discussed in Note 3, in September 2015, the Company completed the Senhance Acquisition using a combination of cash, stock and potential post-acquisition milestone payments. These milestone payments may be payable in the future, depending on the achievement of certain regulatory and commercial milestones. On December 30, 2016, the CompanyIn October 2023, Asensus Surgical US, Inc. entered into an Amendmentagreement with Synchrony Labs, LLC to restructure the termssupport preclinical evaluation of the Second Tranche of the Cash Consideration. Under the Amendment, the Second Tranche was restructured to reduce the contingent cash consideration by €5.0 million in exchange for the issuance of 3,722,685 sharesLUNA Surgical System. William Starling, a current member of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate fair market valueBoard of €5.0 million.  AsDirectors, owns more than 10% of December 31, 2017,Synchrony Labs, LLC. Expenses under the fair value of the contingent consideration was $12.4 million.

Legal Proceedings 

When determining the estimated probable loss or range of losses, significant judgment is required to be exercised in order to estimate the amount and timing of the loss to be recorded.  Estimating an amount or range of possible losses resulting from litigation proceedings is inherently difficult and requires an extensive degree of judgment, particularly where the matters involve indeterminate claims for monetary damages, are in the early stages of the proceedings, and are subject to appeal.  In addition, because most legal proceedings are resolved over extended periods of time, potential losses are subject to change due to, among other things, new developments, changes in legal strategy, the outcome of intermediate procedural and substantive rulings and other parties’ settlement posture and their evaluation of the strength or weakness of their case against the Company.  For these reasons, the Company is currently unable to predict the ultimate timing or outcome of, or reasonably estimate the possible losses or a range of possible losses resulting from, the matters described above. Based on information currently available, the Company does not believe that any reasonably possible losses arising from currently pending legal matters will be material to the Company’s results of operations or financial condition. However, in light of the inherent uncertainties involved in such matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in any particular reporting period.

No liability or related charge was recorded to earnings in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for legal contingenciesagreement were approximately $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, as all pending litigation, including two putative derivative claims were dismissed in 2017 with prejudice in the Company's favor.

.


Operating Leases

On November 2, 2009, TransEnterix Surgical entered into an operating lease for its corporate offices for a period of five years commencing in April 2010. On June 12, 2014, the Company entered into a lease amendment extending the term of the lease for a period of 3 years and 2 months commencing on May 1, 2015 and expiring on June 30, 2018, with an option to renew for an additional three years. On January 8, 2018, the Company entered into a lease amendment extending the term of the lease for a period of eighteen months commencing on July 1, 2018 and expiring on December 31, 2019, with an option to renew for an additional five years. On October 25, 2013, the Company entered into an operating lease for its warehouse for a period of four years and four months commencing in January 2014, with an option to renew for an additional six years. On December 27, 2017 the Company entered into an agreement to terminate this lease effective January 31, 2018. On May 12, 2016 TransEnterix Italia entered into an operating lease for research and development and demonstration facilities for a period of 6 years commencing in July 2016. Rent expense was approximately $1,135,000, $907,000 and $513,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company’s approximate future minimum payments for its operating lease obligations that have initial or remaining noncancelable terms in excess of one year are as follow:2023.

 

 

 

Years ending

December 31,

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

2018

 

 

800

 

2019

 

 

789

 

2020

 

 

260

 

2021

 

 

260

 

2022

 

 

87

 

Total

 

$

2,196

 

74

 

ITEM9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

License and Supply Agreements

As discussed in Note 3, in September 2015, the Company completed the Senhance Acquisition. As part of this transaction, the Company assumed certain license and supply agreements. Commitments under these agreements amount to approximately $2,966,000 in 2018, $1,152,000 in 2019, $600,000 in 2020, $600,000 in 2021, $600,000 in 2021 and $3.0 million thereafter until termination in 2027.

On February 13, 2014, TransEnterix Surgical, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Robotic Development and Supply Agreement (the “Robotic Agreement”) with Microline Surgical, Inc. (“Microline”). Under the Robotic Agreement, Microline was developing a flexible sealer product for exclusive use by the Company with the SurgiBot System in open, minimally invasive and laparoscopic surgery. Payments under the Robotic Agreement were $0 and $400,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As part of the restructuring related to the SurgiBot System, the Robotic Agreement was terminated in 2016.

The Company has placed orders with various suppliers for the purchase of certain tooling, supplies and contract engineering and research services. Each of these orders has a duration or expected completion within the next twelve months.None.

 


22.

Quarterly Results of Operation (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of the Company’s unaudited quarterly results of operations for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):ITEM9.A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

1st

 

 

2nd

 

 

3rd

 

 

4th

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Year

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,946

 

 

$

1,584

 

 

$

183

 

 

 

3,398

 

 

$

7,111

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

1,334

 

 

 

972

 

 

 

921

 

 

 

3,500

 

 

 

6,727

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

1,636

 

 

 

1,687

 

 

 

1,821

 

 

 

2,714

 

 

 

7,858

 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

 

 

1,227

 

 

 

(774

)

 

 

773

 

 

 

800

 

 

 

2,026

 

Issuance costs for warrants

 

 

 

 

 

627

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

627

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

13,627

 

 

 

11,538

 

 

 

12,337

 

 

 

14,298

 

 

 

51,800

 

Change in fair value of warrant liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

2,326

 

 

 

22,887

 

 

 

58,521

 

 

 

83,734

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

394

 

 

 

662

 

 

 

695

 

 

 

684

 

 

 

2,435

 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(16,272

)

 

 

(15,454

)

 

 

(39,251

)

 

 

(77,119

)

 

 

(148,096

)

Income tax benefit

 

 

858

 

 

 

741

 

 

 

738

 

 

 

963

 

 

 

3,300

 

Net loss

 

$

(15,414

)

 

$

(14,713

)

 

$

(38,513

)

 

$

(76,156

)

 

$

(144,796

)

Net loss per share - basic and diluted

 

$

(0.13

)

 

$

(0.11

)

 

$

(0.26

)

 

$

(0.40

)

 

$

(0.97

)

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

1st

 

 

2nd

 

 

3rd

 

 

4th

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Year

 

Total revenues

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,466

 

 

$

53

 

 

$

1,519

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,031

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

1,069

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

1,817

 

 

 

1,786

 

 

 

1,709

 

 

 

1,655

 

 

 

6,967

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

 

 

61,784

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,784

 

Restructuring and other charges

 

 

 

 

 

3,085

 

 

 

 

 

 

(21

)

 

 

3,064

 

Inventory write-down related to restructuring

 

 

 

 

 

2,565

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,565

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

13,163

 

 

 

11,509

 

 

 

12,278

 

 

 

12,769

 

 

 

49,719

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

578

 

 

 

394

 

 

 

462

 

 

 

420

 

 

 

1,854

 

Loss before income taxes

 

$

(15,558

)

 

$

(81,123

)

 

$

(14,014

)

 

$

(14,808

)

 

$

(125,503

)

Income tax benefit

 

$

2,645

 

 

$

992

 

 

$

1,070

 

 

$

816

 

 

$

5,523

 

Net loss

 

$

(12,913

)

 

$

(80,131

)

 

$

(12,944

)

 

$

(13,992

)

 

$

(119,980

)

Net loss per share - basic and diluted

 

$

(0.12

)

 

$

(0.70

)

 

$

(0.11

)

 

$

(0.12

)

 

$

(1.07

)


ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9.A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2017.2023. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2017,2023, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level.due to ongoing remediation efforts described below. 

Management’s Report on

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

For the period ended December 31, 2022, management identified a material weakness related to information technology general controls (“ITGCs”) in user access over certain information technology (“IT”) systems that support the Company’s financial reporting processes.  Remediation of this material weakness has extended into the year ended December 31, 2023, and is currently ongoing.

The 2022 material weakness did not result in any material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. Our management concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Managements Plan to Remediate the Material Weakness

Our remediation efforts are ongoing and we will continue our initiatives to implement measures designed to ensure that control deficiencies contributing to the material weakness are remediated, such that these controls are designed, implemented, and operating effectively. We are committed to making the necessary changes and improvements to our system of controls to address the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described above.

Our renewed emphasis of designing and implementing improved processes and controls will involve but is not limited to the following:

Expand available resources with experience designing and implementing control activities, including ITGCs and automated controls, both by hiring internally and the use of third-party consultations and specialists.

Adjust access profiles in IT systems and relevant software, and adjust access review and user activity review controls accordingly.

Refine the IT policies and procedures that relate to the provisioning of access, reviewing of access, and reviewing of user activity.

Refine control activities related to the information used in the controls for further completeness and accuracy regarding the provisioning of access, reviewing of access, and reviewing of user activity.

We are in the process of implementing the remediation activities as of the date of this report and believe that upon completion, we will have remediated the identified material weakness. However, material weaknesses are not considered remediated until new internal controls have been operational for a period of time, are tested, and management concludes that these controls are operating effectively. We expect to complete the remediation activities in the fiscal year 2024. We will continue to monitor the effectiveness of these remediation measures, and we will make any changes to the design of this plan and take such other actions that we deem appropriate given the circumstances.

Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. InternalAs defined in the securities laws, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reportingprinciples and includes those policies and procedures that:that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactionsacquisitions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company;directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’sour assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management (with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, based on the original framework established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2017,2023, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, BDO USA, LLP, audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. BDO USA, LLP’s report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 is set forth herein.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There

We developed a plan to remediate the material weakness in fiscal year 2023. Except for the remediation efforts described above, including the initiation of new internal controls and conducting testing in respect to the material weakness, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the last quarter ended December 31, 2023, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9.B.

OTHER INFORMATION

76

On March 6, 2018,

We are taking additional measures to address the Company entered into new employment agreementsmaterial weakness and may need to modify the planned remediation steps.  We cannot be certain that the measures we have taken, and expect to take, to improve our internal controls will be sufficient to address the issues identified, to ensure that our internal controls are effective or to ensure that the identified material weakness will not result in a material misstatement of our annual consolidated financial statements. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will not identify additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the future. If we are unable to remediate the material weakness, our ability to record, process and report financial information accurately, and to prepare financial statements with eachthe time periods specified by the rules and forms of Todd Pope, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Joseph Slattery,Securities and Exchange Commission, could be adversely affected.

Notwithstanding the Company’s Executive Vice Presidentidentified material weakness, management does not believe that the deficiencies had an adverse effect on our reported operating results or financial condition, and Chief Financial Officermanagement has determined that the financial statements and Anthony Fernando, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer.  The new agreements provideother information included in this report and other periodic filings present fairly in all material respects our financial condition and results of operations at and for the following changes:  (1) standardization among Messrs. Slattery and Fernandoperiods presented.

ITEM9.B.OTHER INFORMATION

During the three months ended December 31, 2023, none of the post-termination compensation to be paid, both in the event of a termination without Causeour directors or for Good Reason (as each term in defined in the agreements) prior to a Change in Controlofficers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the agreements)Exchange Act) adopted, modified or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement”, as such terms are defined in the eventItem 408 of a termination without Cause or for Good Reason in the one year period following, or six months prior to and in connection with a Change inRegulation S-K.


Control; and (2) the addition of target bonus to the severance benefits to be paid to each of the executive officers in a covered termination of employment.  With these changes, the severance paid on a termination without Cause or for Good Reason prior to a Change in Control is the sum of base salary and target bonus for nine (9) months for Messrs. Slattery and Fernando and twelve (12) months for Mr. Pope, plus reimbursement of health care benefit costs for such nine- and twelve-month periods.  The period for payment of severance benefits increases to eighteen (18) months for Messrs. Slattery and Fernando and twenty-four (24) months for Mr. Pope following a termination without Cause or for Good Reason in the covered period if a Change in Control occurs, plus the acceleration of all outstanding unvested equity awards.  No compensation is paid single-trigger upon the occurrence of a Change in Control.  The employment agreements each have an effective date of March 1, 2018 and a two-year term, subject to automatic renewal unless terminated with at least six months’ prior written notice prior to the expiration of the term or any extension.  The entry into the new employment agreements caused a termination and replacement of the prior employment agreements between each such executive officer and the Company.

This summary of the employment agreements is not complete, and reference is made to the agreements as filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein.ITEM9.C.DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

 

PART III

ITEM 

ITEM10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in our Proxy Statementproxy statement for the Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders expected to be filed with the SEC on or prior to April 30, 2018.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be filed with the SEC on or prior to April 30, 2018.29, 2024.

 

ITEM 12.

ITEM11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in our Proxy Statementproxy statement for the Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders expected to be filed with the SEC on or prior to April 30, 2018.29, 2024.

 

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be filed with the SEC on or prior to April 30, 2018.ITEM12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in our Proxy Statementproxy statement for the Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders expected to be filed with the SEC on or prior to April 30, 2018.29, 2024.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The Company currently has one equity compensation plan under which it makes awards, the Asensus Surgical, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan was originally approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, or the Board, and adopted by the majority of stockholders on November 13, 2007. The Plan was subsequently amended, approved by the Board, and approved by stockholders as follows:

No.

Amendment Purpose

Date of Stockholders’ approval

1

increase the number of shares of common stock authorized under the Plan to 918,462 shares, and to make other changes

May 7, 2015

2

increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 1,456,923 shares, and to make other changes

June 8, 2016

3

increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 1,995,385 shares

May 25, 2017

4

increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 3,149,231 shares

May 24, 2018

5

increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 4,072,308 shares, and to make other changes

April 24, 2019

6

increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 10,072,307 shares, and to make other changes

June 8, 2020

7

Increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 32,072,307 shares.

July 22, 2021

8

Increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan to 54,072,307 shares

June 6, 2023

The Plan is used for plan-based awards for officers, other employees, consultants, advisors and non-employee directors.

The following table gives information about the Company’s common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and other equity awards as of December 31, 2023:

Plan Category

 

Number of
securities to

be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options and

other

equity

awards (1)

  

Weighted
average

exercise
price of
outstanding
options

  

Number of
securities
remaining
available
for future
issuance (2)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  22,620,856   3.24   22,185,899 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (3)

  150,000   0.42   0 

Total

  22,770,856       22,185,899 

(1)

Includes 10,294,679 shares underlying outstanding stock options awarded under the Plan and 12,326,177 restricted stock units awarded under the Plan.

(2)

These shares are all available for future awards under the Plan.

(3)

Represents 150,000 shares underlying outstanding stock options issued as an employment inducement grant as an exception to the NYSE American stockholder approval rules.

ITEM13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders expected to be filed with the SEC on or prior to April 29, 2024.

 

 

ITEM14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information contained in our proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders expected to be filed with the SEC on or prior to April 29, 2024.

PART IV

ITEM15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a).

ITEM 15.(1)

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESThe following consolidated financial statements are filed as a part of this Annual Report:

 

(a)

(1) The following consolidated financial statements are filed as a part of this Annual Report:

 

(2)

Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules: The information required by this item ishas been omitted in this report because they are not applicable, not required under these instructions, or included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes thereto contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report.

(3)

Exhibits: The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report.

Exhibit

No.

Exhibits: The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report.

Exhibit
No.

Description

    1.1

Controlled Equity Offering SM Sales Agreement by and between TransEnterix, Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated February 20, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 20, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein).

    1.2

Underwriting Agreement by and among TransEnterix, Inc. and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and RBC Capital Markets, LLC dated June 11, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 12, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein).

    1.3

Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement by and between TransEnterix, Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. dated February 9, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 9, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein).

    1.4

Underwriting Agreement, dated April 28, 2017, by and between the Company and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein).

    1.5

At-the-Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement by and between TransEnterix, Inc. and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, dated August 31, 2017 (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 31, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein).

2.1

Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated September 18, 2015, by and among Sofar S.p.A., Vulcanos S.r.l., the CompanyRegistrant and TransEnterix International, Inc. filed as Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 21, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein).

2.1(a)

Amendment to Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and among TransEnterix, Inc., TransEnterix International, Inc., and Sofar, S.p.A., dated December 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company'sour Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 5, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein).

3.1.1

    3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 9, 2013February 25, 2021 and incorporated by reference herein).

    3.1.1

Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of TransEnterix, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 1, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K,8‑K, filed with the SEC on December 9, 2013February 25, 2021 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.1

Specimen Certificate for Common Stock of TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc. (filed as(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-193235, filed with the SEC on January 8, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).


Exhibit

No.

Description

    4.2

Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock for warrants issued to Oxford Finance LLC and Silicon Valley Bank (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Currentour Annual Report on Form 8-K, filed with10-K for the SEC on September 30, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein)year ended December 31, 2020).

4.2

    4.3

Form of Common Stock Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 10, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein).

    4.4

Form of Common Stock Warrant dated March 22, 2013 (filed as part of Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 26, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein).

    4.5

Form of Series A Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein).

    4.6

Form of Series B Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein).

   4.7

Form of Warrant to Purchase Stock for warrants issued to Innovatus Life Sciences Lending Fund I, LP (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 10, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein).

   4.8

Form of Service Warrant to purchase common stock for warrants issued to third party vendor (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 9, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein).

4.3

  10.1

Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement byWarrant (Series C and between TransEnterix, Inc. and Lincoln Park Capital, LLC dated December 16, 2016Series D Warrants) (filed as exhibit 10.1Exhibit 4.1 to the Company'sour Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 20, 2016March 6, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.4

Form of Warrant Agency Agreement by and between the Registrant and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 6, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.5

Description of Listed Securities (filed as Exhibit 4.8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.6

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 28, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.1 +

Employment Agreement, dated March 6, 2018, and effective as of March 1, 2018, by and between the Registrant and Anthony Fernando (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 8, 2018 and incorporated by reference herein).

10.2+

Employment Agreement, dated August 14, 2020, by and between Asensus Canada, Inc., on behalf of the Registrant, and Shameze Rampertab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed with the SEC on August 14, 2020 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10. 2+10.2.1+

Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2020, by and between Asensus Canada, Inc., on behalf of the Registrant, and Shameze Rampertab (filed as Exhibit 10.1.2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on November 6, 2020 and incorporated by reference herein).

10.3 +

Asensus Surgical Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated June 6, 2023 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 6, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3.1 +

Form of Employee Stock Option Award Notice (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2022).

10.3.2 + *

Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit/Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice.

10.3.3 +

Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.4.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3.4 +

Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement pursuant to the Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.4.6 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3.5 +

Form of Non-Employee Director Other Stock Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4.7 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3.6 +

Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Grant in Lieu of Cash Retainer (filed as Exhibit 10.4.8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.4+

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, adopted December 8, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2022).

10.5 ++

License Contract between the European Union and Vulcanos S.r.l. (now known as TransEnterixAsensus Surgical Italia S.r.l.), dated September 18, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 9, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein).

10.5.1 +++

Amendment to License Contract between the European Union and Asensus Surgical Italia S.r.l., effective July 2, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2022).

  10.310.6 +

Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 21, 2015,Asensus Surgical Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan effective July 1, 2021 (incorporated by and between the Company and Sofar S.p.A. (filed asreference to Exhibit 10.310.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 21, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein)April 30, 2021).

10.7

  10.4

Lock-Up Agreement, dated September 21, 2015, by and between the Company and Sofar S.p.A. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 21, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.5 + *

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 6, 2018, and effective as of March 1, 2018, by and between the Registrant and Todd M. Pope.

  10.6 + * 

Employment Agreement, dated March 6, 2018, and effective as of March 1, 2018, by and between the Registrant and Joseph P. Slattery.

  10.7 + *

Employment Agreement, dated March 6, 2018, and effective as of March 1, 2018, by and between the Registrant and Anthony Fernando.

  10.8+

TransEnterix, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective July 2, 2017 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 9, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.9 +

Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.10 +

Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement (performance stock options) pursuant to the Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.11 +

Form of Non-Employee Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).


Exhibit

No.

Description

  10.12 +

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement pursuant to the Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.13 +

Restricted Stock UnitSecurities Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2013, by and betweenJuly 27, 2023, among the Company and Joseph P. Slattery (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, purchasers signatory thereto (filed with the SEC on March 5, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.14

Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated September 26, 2014, among the Borrowers and the Lenders and Collateral Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 30, 2014July 28, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference herein)

  10.14.1

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated August 14, 2015, by and among TransEnterix, Inc., TransEnterix Surgical, Inc. and SafeStitch LLC, as Borrower, and Oxford Finance LLC, as Lender and Collateral Agent, and Silicon Valley Bank, as Lender (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 17, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein)).

  10.14.2

Consent and Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated September 18, 2015, by and among the Company, its subsidiaries TransEnterix Surgical, Inc. and SafeStitch LLC (collectively, the “Borrowers”), and SVB, as Lender, and Oxford, as Lender and Collateral Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 21, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.14.3

Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated November 13, 2015, by and among TransEnterix, Inc., TransEnterix Surgical, Inc. and SafeStitch LLC, as Borrower, and Oxford Finance LLC, as Lender and Collateral Agent, and Silicon Valley Bank, as Lender (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 16, 2015 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.14.4

Consent and Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated April 19, 2016, by and among TransEnterix, Inc., TransEnterix Surgical, Inc., SafeStitch LLC and TransEnterix International, Inc., Oxford Finance LLC, and Silicon Valley Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on May 10, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.14.5

Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated September 7, 2016, by and among TransEnterix, Inc., TransEnterix Surgical, Inc., SafeStitch LLC and TransEnterix International, Inc., Oxford Finance LLC, and Silicon Valley Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 8, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.15

Lease Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2009, by and between TransEnterix, Inc. and GRE Keystone Technology Park Three LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to Amendment No. 2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.15.1

Lease Modification Agreement No. 1, dated as of May 4, 2010, by and between TransEnterix, Inc. and GRE Keystone Technology Park Three LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.25.1 to Amendment No. 2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).

  10.16

Loan and Security Agreement, dated May 10, 2017, by and among the Company, TransEnterix Surgical, Inc., TransEnterix International, Inc. and SafeStitch LLC, as Borrower, and Innovatus Life Sciences Lending Fund I, LP, as Lender and Collateral Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 10, 2017 and incorporated by reference herein).

   10.17*+++

System Sale and Cooperation Agreement, dated December 15, 2017, by and between the Company and Great Belief International Limited.

21.1 *

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.Registrant

23.1 *

Consent of BDO USA, LLP.P.C.

31.1 *

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

31.2 *

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

32.1 *

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 *

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

97 *

Compensation Recoupment Policy of Asensus Surgical, Inc., effective October 2, 2023.

101.INS *

Inline XBRL Instance Document.


Exhibit

No.

Description

101.SCH *

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

 

101.CAL *

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF *

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB *

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE *

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

104

The cover page from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, formatted in Inline XBRL (included in Exhibit 101).

 

+

A management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be separately identified.

++

Confidential treatment has been granted for certain portions of the agreement pursuant to a confidential treatment request filed with the Commission on November 9, 2015. Such provisions have been filed separately with the Commission.

+++

Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portionsPortions of this agreement pursuant to an application for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 2018. Such provisionsexhibit have been filed separately withomitted because the Commission.information is not material and would likely cause competitive harm if publicly disclosed.

*

*Filed herewith.

Filed herewith.

 

ITEM16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY.

ITEM 16.

FORM 10-K SUMMARY.

 

Registrants may voluntarily include a summary of information required by Form 10-K under this Item 16. The Company has elected not to include such summary information.

 

 

SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: March 8, 201821, 2024

TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc.

By:

/s/ Todd M. PopeAnthony Fernando

Todd M. PopeAnthony Fernando

President, Chief Executive Officer

and a Director

(principal executive officer)

(principal executive officer)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

We, the undersigned officers and directors of TransEnterix,Asensus Surgical, Inc., hereby severally constitute and appoint Todd M. PopeAnthony Fernando and Joseph P. Slattery,Shameze Rampertab, our true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitutionre-substitution in him for him and in his name, place and stead, and in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as full to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

Title(s)

Date

/s/ Todd M. PopeAnthony Fernando

President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director

March 21, 2024

Anthony Fernando

(principal executive officer)

March 8, 2018

Todd M. Pope

/s/ Joseph P. SlatteryShameze Rampertab

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 21, 2024

Shameze Rampertab

(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

March 8, 2018

Joseph P. Slattery

/s/ Paul A. LaVioletteDavid B. Milne

Chairman of the Board and a Director

March 8, 201821, 2024

Paul A. LaVioletteDavid B. Milne

/s/ Andrea Biffi

Director

March 8, 201821, 2024

Andrea Biffi

/s/ Jane H. HsaioKevin Hobert

Director

March 8, 201821, 2024

Jane H. Hsaio, Ph.D.Kevin Hobert

/s/ William N. KelleyElizabeth Kwo, M.D.

 

Director

 

March 8, 201821, 2024

William N. Kelley,Elizabeth Kwo, M.D.

/s/ Aftab R. Kherani

Director

March 8, 2018

Aftab R. Kherani

/s/ David B. Milne

Director

March 8, 2018

David B. Milne

/s/ Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.

Director

March 8, 201821, 2024

Richard C. Pfenniger, Jr.

/s/ William N. Starling, Jr.

Director

March 8, 201821, 2024

William N. Starling, Jr.

 

84

83