UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31 2018, 2021

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      TO                     

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

Commission File Number 001-38467

img213354928_0.jpg 

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

 

 

Delaware

46-3231686

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

3311 East Old Shakopee Road

Minneapolis, Minnesota55425

(952) (952) 853-8100

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.01 par value

Common Stock, $.01 par value

New York Stock Exchange

Toronto Stock Exchange

(Title of each class)class

(

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered)

Common Stock, $.01 par value

CDAY

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

None

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES YesNo NO 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. YES Yes NO No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES Yes NO No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). YES Yes NO No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

 

 

Accelerated filer

 

Non-accelerated filer

 

 

Small reporting company

 

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES Yes    NO No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the $33.19$95.92 closing price of the shares of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2018,2021, was $938.7$13,342.1 million.

The number of shares of Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of February 25, 201918, 2022 was 140,514,889.152,049,674.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement relating to the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, scheduled to be held on May 1, 2019,3, 2022, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

 

 

Page

PART I

 

 

Item 1.

Business

23

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

810

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

3524

Item 2.

Properties

3524

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

3524

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

3524

 

 

PART II

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

3625

Item 6.

Selected Financial DataReserved

3826

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

3927

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

6546

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

6648

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

112101

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

112101

Item 9B.

Other Information

112102

 

 

PART III

 

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

113103

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

113103

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

113103

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

113104

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

113104

 

 

PART IV

 

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

114105

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

108

i1 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 of Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. and subsidiaries (“Form 10-K”) to “our company,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Ceridian” refer to Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

We and our subsidiaries own or have the rights to various trademarks, trade names and service marks, including the following: Ceridian®, Dayforce®, Makes Work Life Better, Powerpay® and various logos used in association with these terms. Solely for convenience, the trademarks, trade names and service marks and copyrights referred to herein are listed without the ©, ®, and ™, symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that Ceridian, or the applicable owner, will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, Ceridian’s or their, as applicable, rights to these trademarks, trade names, and service marks. Other trademarks, service marks, or trade names appearing in this Form 10-K are the property of their respective owners.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-K contains, or incorporates by reference, not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) and that are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. All statements other than statements of historical fact or relating to present facts or current conditions included in this Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements concerning the conditions of the human capital management solutions industrygive our current expectations and our operations, performance, and financial condition, including, in particular, statementsprojections relating to our business, growth strategies, product development efforts,financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and future expenses. Forward-lookingbusiness. You can identify forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “anticipates,“anticipate,“intends,“estimate,“plans,“expect,“seeks,“project,“believes,“seek,“estimates,“plan,“expects,“intend,“assumes,“believe,“projects,“will,” “may,” “could,” “may,“continue,“will,“likely,” “should,” and other words and terms of similar references tomeaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future periods,operating or by the inclusion of forecastsfinancial performance or projections.other events but not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words.

Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy, and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, by their nature, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. As a result, our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include regional, national, or global political, economic, business, competitive, market, and regulatory conditions and those risks described in Part I, Item IA, “Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K. Although we have attempted to identify important risk factors, there may be other risk factors not presently known to us or that we presently believe are not material that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K. If any of these risks materialize, or if any of the above assumptions underlying forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual results and developments may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K. For the reasons described above, we caution you against relying on any forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this Form 10-K speaks only as of the date on which we make it. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or to revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise, except as may be required by law. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless specifically expressed as such, and should be viewed as historical data.


2 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of ContentsPART I

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on July 3, 2013. On April 30, 2018, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”), in which we issued and sold 24,150,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $22.00 per share. Concurrently with our IPO, we issued an additional 4,545,455 shares of our common stock in a private placement at $22.00 per share. Contemporaneously with our IPO, we distributed our controlling financial interest in LifeWorks Corporation Ltd (“LifeWorks”) to our stockholders of record prior to the IPO on a pro rata basis in accordance with their pro rata interests in us.Overview

Following our IPO, we remain a controlled company by our financial sponsors: affiliates and co-investors of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (“THL”) and Cannae Holdings, Inc. (“Cannae”).  Collectively, THL and Cannae are referred to as our “Sponsors.”  

Overview

Ceridian is a global human capital management (“HCM”) software company. Dayforce, our flagship cloud HCM platform, provides human resources (“HR”), payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management functionality. In addition to Dayforce, we sell Powerpay, a cloud HR and payroll solution for the Canadian small business market, through both direct sales and established partner channels. We also continue to support customers using our legacy North America Bureau solutions, which we generally stopped actively selling to new customers in 2012, following the acquisition of Dayforce.Dayforce, and customers using our acquired Bureau solutions which we also intend to stop actively selling to new customers on a stand-alone basis. We invest in maintenance and necessary updates to support our Bureau customers and continue to migrate them to Dayforce. Revenue from our Cloud and Bureau solutions include investment income generated from holding customer funds before funds are remitted to taxing authorities, also referred to as float revenue or float.

Our five strategic growth levers drive our long-term perspectives, near-term decision making and stockholder alignment:

Acquiring new customers in the markets where we have seen success to date;
Extending the Dayforce platform, thereby allowing us to deliver more value to our current and prospective customers;
Expanding within the Enterprise segment;
Accelerating our global expansion both by serving local customers in new geographies, and by extending our scope to service global multinational customers; and finally,
Driving incremental value for our customers by innovating in adjacent markets around our core HCM suite, such as the Dayforce Wallet.

Products and Services

Dayforce

Dayforce, our principleprincipal cloud HCM platform, is a single application that provides continuous real-time calculations across all modules to enable, for example, payroll administrators access to data through the entire pay period, and managers access to real-time data to optimize work schedules. Dayforce offers a comprehensive range of functionality, including global HR, payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management on web and native iOS and Android platforms. Our Dayforce mobile app enables employees not only to request and to trade schedules, but also to see the real-time impact of schedule changes on their pay. Our Dayforce platform is used by organizations, regardless of industry or size, to optimize management of the entire employee lifecycle, including attracting, engaging, paying, deploying, and developing their people. Key functionality of our Dayforce platform includes HR, payroll and tax, Dayforce Wallet, benefits, workforce management, and talent management.

In 2021, we received several accolades for our Dayforce solution, including Leader in the 2021 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Cloud HCM Suites for the second consecutive year, and CIPD People Management Awards: Best Human Resources/Learning & Development Supplier; Human Resources Director Asia - 5 Star HR Software; Aite-Novarica Digital Wallet Impact Innovation Award - Dayforce Wallet; Leader in the Nucleus Research 2021 Human Capital Management Value Matrix.

Human Resources

Dayforce Human Resources functionality provides customers with a single, complete record for all employees. Our HR functionality is centered on a comprehensive, flexible workflow engine that streamlines and automates administrative tasks.

Payroll and Tax

Our payroll capabilities provide customers with the tools needed to accurately and compliantly manage their payroll processes.processes accurately and in compliance. Through our Dayforce platform, users in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdomwith localized payroll functionality are able to make updates to time and pay in real-time. In countries where we do not currently offer localized payroll within Dayforce, Dayforce

3 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

ConnectedPay provides payroll aggregation features that allow an organization to have a centralized view of their global payroll. ConnectedPay automates the data exchange with in-country payroll providers, including our global Cloud solutions from acquired businesses, and provides a consistent self-service experience for employees to view earnings statements and associated payroll documentation. Dayforce calculates, withholds, and files payroll related taxes in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and CanadaMauritius as part of our localized payroll offering.


Benefits In 2021, we announced our plans to deliver Dayforce Payroll across new markets, including Germany, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand.

Dayforce Wallet

Dayforce Wallet is a digital wallet for customers' employees on the Dayforce platform. The Dayforce Wallet offers the flexibility and convenience of processing and distributing customers’ different payment needs, including off-cycle pay and on-demand pay requests. Since all employee payments are processed as a regular payroll, the appropriate deductions, remittances, and garnishments are accounted for, which means there’s minimal impact to payroll administrators and our customers' cash flow.

The Dayforce Wallet gives our customers’ employees greater control over their financial well-being by providing them with instant access to their earnings. The on-demand pay feature allows employees more choice over when they get paid by making any day payday. Dayforce Wallet enables workers to access their already-earned wages anytime during the pay period, net of taxes, withholdings and other payroll deductions. The on-demand wages are loaded onto a pay card, which customers’ employees can use anywhere credit or debit cards are accepted. With pay cards, the Dayforce Wallet eliminates the need to distribute paper checks and reduces processing costs. The Dayforce Wallet mobile app makes it easy for customers’ employees to check their pay deposits, account balance and transaction history. This provides the convenience of a traditional bank account, but without the balance minimums and monthly service fees.

The Dayforce Wallet was launched in the U.S. in 2020 and in Canada in 2021. We continue to introduce new features and enhancements to the Dayforce Wallet, such as two day early direct deposit, which allows users that have direct deposit set up not only to get paid when they want, but also the option to receive the remainder of their paycheck two days in advance of normal payroll dates. Additional features, such as Streaming Pay, Dayforce Wallet Rewards, referrals, additional pay card functionality, buy now pay later, and saving goals will be introduced in the upcoming quarters. Streaming Pay enables customers’ employees the ability to request automatic delivery of earned wages to their Dayforce Wallet pay card, eliminating the need to request earnings on-demand. We believe these features will enhance our Dayforce Wallet consumer experience and help improve financial wellness over the long term.

Benefits

Dayforce Benefits assists users from benefits enrollment to ongoing benefits administration, including eligibility, open enrollment and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) management. Support and comparative tools can provide information to users about each of the available benefit plans and impact of their plan options to help employees choose the best option for their specific needs.

Talent Management

Dayforce Talent Management enables organizations to attract, to engage, to develop, and to motivate their workforce. Users can leverage tools for recruiting, onboarding, engagement, performance, succession planning, compensation management, and employee learning.

Workforce Management

Dayforce Workforce Management provides functionality to help organizations manage their workforces, improve operational efficiency, and enhance compliance by configuring the system to meet complex labor and employment rules and policies. Through Dayforce, users are offered absence management, time and attendance, schedule, and labor planning.

Talent Management4 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Dayforce Talent Management enables organizations to attract, to engage, to develop, and to motivate their workforce.  Users can leverage tools for recruiting, onboarding, performance, succession planning, compensation management, and employee learning.  

Powerpay

We offer Powerpay for Canadian organizations with fewer than 100 employees. Powerpay is a cloud platform that provides scalable and straightforward payroll and HR solutions. Specifically designed for small businesses, Powerpay enables clients to pay their employees accurately and on-time. As of December 31, 2018, Powerpay had over 38,000 customer accounts.

Bureau

Our Bureau solutions offer payroll and payroll-related services using legacy technology.technology and Bureau technology from our acquired businesses. We invest in maintenance and necessary updates to support our Bureau customers. We generally stopped selling our legacy North America Bureau payroll solutions to new customers in the United States in 2012, and in Canada in 2015, and continuewe also intend to convertstop actively selling our acquired Bureau payroll solutions to new customers on a stand-alone basis. In addition to customers who use our Dayforce platform.payroll services, certain customers use our legacy Bureau tax filing services on a stand-alone basis; and we started to sell stand-alone legacy Bureau tax services again in 2019.

Revenue by Product and ServiceCustomers

For a quantitative discussion of our revenue by solution, please refer to Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K.  

Customers

Dayforce is designed to serve organizations with 100 to over 100,000 employees. The Dayforce customer base has increased from 482 as of December 31, 2012 to 3,718 customers live5,434 customers* on the platform as of December 31, 2018. In addition, we had over 450 net new2021. For 2021, our 5,434 Dayforce customers contracted, but not yet live on Dayforce as of December 31, 2018. We expect the majority of these Dayforce customers to be taken live in 2019. For 2018, our 3,718 live Dayforce customerscustomers* represented over 3.1approximately 5.1 million active users.global users*. We define a customer as a single organization, such as a company, a non-profit association, an educational institution, or government entity. We also have over 38,000approximately 39,000 Powerpay customer accounts. No single customer accounted for more than 1% of our revenues during the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

Sales and Marketing

We sell our Cloud solutions through a direct sales force and a variety of third party channels, organized by customer size and geography. We market Dayforce to organizations with more than 100 employees. We market Powerpay to organizations with fewer than 100 employees in Canada. The majority of our revenue growth comes from new Cloud customers.

Services and Support

We offer a broad portfolio of services aimed to ensure customer success. We believe it’s important to work closely with our customers but we also have a small, dedicated account management team focused onto understand their needs and deliver technology solutions and support that address them. We continue to increase our global reach in supporting and serving the needsour customers. As part of our Bureau customers and helping theminternational strategy, we work with partners to migrate toperform services in certain geographies where we do not currently have international operations or the particular service required by our Dayforce platform.customers.


Implementation and Professional Services

Our internal implementation team leverages proprietary onboarding technology for new customer activation and professional services work. Our internal team is supplemented by a small number of third party services partners.partners and system integration partners (“SI”). Our implementation services include solution configuration and activation for new customers. Professional services include add-on implementation services for existing customer,customers, ongoing product configuration changes when the customer does not have the resources to do it themselves, product usage consulting and a variety of additional services, such as report writing, usage audits, and process improvement.

Customer Support

Our global customer support organization provides 24/7 application support from officeslocations across North America and in the United Kingdom, Mauritius, Australia, Singapore, Philippines, and Australia.India. Our support function is organized into specialized podsteams of approximately 18 representatives with deep domain expertise across our platform. These podsteams are grouped by customeraligned to groups of customers based on geography, product type, and product typeclient vertical to provide a combination of deep product and industry knowledge, consistent relationships, and high availability.

* Excluding the 2021 acquisitions of Ascender and ADAM HCM

5 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Technology, Hosting, and Research and Development (“R&D”)

Technology and innovation are at the core of Ceridian. Our innovation and development process is customer-driven. We work directly with customers to understand their needs and to deliver solutions that address their challenges, through the lens oftaking into consideration the entire user experience, without being constrained by individual modules or applications. We are committed to protecting our customer information, along with our employee and contractor information and other business data.

Our R&D team is responsible for the design, development, and testing of our applications. We believe that our modern cloud technology stack, agile design and development methodology, and efficient software deployment process enable us to innovate quickly in response to industry trends. We host Dayforce and Powerpaycloud-based applications and serve all of our customers from data centers operated by third party providers, primarily NaviSite, in Boston, Massachusetts; Redhill, England; Santa Clara, California; Toronto, Canada; Vancouver, Canada; and Woking, England. We also host Dayforce Australia inNavisite, VMWare Cloud on AWS, Microsoft Azure, in Melbourne, Australia and Sydney, Australia.AWS. While we control and have access to our servers and all of the components of our network that are located in our external data centers, we do not control the operation of these facilities. Additionally, we host our internal systems through data centers that we operate and lease or own in Atlanta, Georgia; Fountain Valley, California; Louisville, Kentucky; St. Petersburg, Florida; and Winnipeg, Canada.

Competition

The market for HCM technology solutions is rapidly changing, with legacy service bureau and on-premise software providers facing increased competition from emerging cloud players. We currently compete with firms that provide both integrated and point solutions for HCM. Legacy payroll service providers, such as Automatic Data Processing (“ADP”), provide HCM solutions primarily through service bureau models. These vendors often have more in-house resources, greater name recognition, and longer operating histories than Dayforce and may seek to expand their cloud offerings through acquisition or organic product development. We also compete with cloud-enabled client-server HCM providers, such as The Ultimate Software Group, Inc. (“Ultimate Software”). These companies, whose products were developed over 20 years ago as on-premise solutions, have modified and redeployed their platforms as hybrid software as a service (“SaaS”) offerings. This has allowed them to transition their business model to offer hosted and cloud solutions, resulting in significantly larger customer bases. More recently, we face competition from modern HCM providers, such as Workday, Inc. (“Workday”), whose solutions have been specifically built as single application platforms in the cloud. In addition, we also face competition from large, long-established enterprise application software vendors, such as Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”)United States and SAP SE (“SAP”Asia Pacific Japan ("APJ"). These companies are seeking to expand their cloud offerings through both acquisition and internal development efforts. We also compete with point solutions, such as Kronos Incorporated (“Kronos”) for workforce management and Cornerstone OnDemand Inc. (“Cornerstone OnDemand”) for talent management.


We believe the principal competitive factors in our market include the following:

(i)

Breadth and depth of product functionality;

(ii)

Scalability and reliability of applications;

(iii)

Robust workforce management;

(iv)

Comprehensive tax services;

(v)

Modern and intuitive technology and user experience;

(vi)

Multi-country and jurisdiction domain expertise in payroll and HCM;

(vii)

Quality of implementation and customer service;

(viii)

Integration with a wide variety of third party applications and systems;

(ix)

Total cost of ownership and ROI;

(x)

Brand awareness and reputation;

(xi)

Pricing; and

(xii)

Distribution.

Employees and Culture

As of December 31, 2018, we had 4,444 active employees, including 3,759 in North America, Europe, and Australia, and 685 in Mauritius. We also engage temporary employees and consultants when needed to enhance our workforce. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we have never experienced any work stoppages.

Ceridian believes in diversity and equality for all people and fosters a culture that engages and celebrates our employees. In 2018, we were recognized with over 20 awards related to our company culture and workplace experiences, including Glassdoor Employees’ Choice Awards for 2018 Best Places to Work (Canada and United States), Best Workplaces certification (Canada and United States), Brandon Hall’s Excellence in Talent Management Award for Best Advance in High Potential Development, and 2018 Working Mother 100 Best Companies.

Intellectual Property

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property. We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and trademarks, as well as confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements and other contractual protections, to establish and to safeguard our intellectual property rights.

BacklogCompetition

The market for HCM technology solutions is highly competitive and Seasonalitysubject to changing technology and shifting client needs. We compete with firms that provide both integrated and point solutions for HCM, as well as with local providers in each jurisdiction that we operate. Globally, we compete with legacy payroll service providers, as well as cloud-enabled client-server HCM providers. We also face competition from modern HCM providers, whose solutions have been specifically built as single application platforms in the cloud. In addition, we face competition from large, long-established enterprise application software vendors.

ForCompetition in the global HCM market is primarily based on product and service quality, including ease of use and accessibility of technology, breadth of offerings, reputation, and price. We believe that we are competitive in each of these areas and that our single application always-on technology and product innovations, combined with our commitment to service and our geographic reach, distinguishes us from our competitors.

Seasonality

We have in the past and expect in the future to experience seasonal fluctuations in our revenues and new customer contracts with the fourth quarter historically being our strongest quarter for new customer contracts, renewals, and customer go-lives. Although the growth of our Cloud solutions and the ratable nature of our fees makes this seasonality less apparent in our overall results of operations, we expect our revenue to fluctuate quarterly and to be higher in the fourth and first quarters of each year. Fourth quarter revenue is driven by year-end processing fees and Dayforce customer go-lives; and first quarter revenue is driven by revenue earned for printing of year-end tax packages.

Environmental, Social, and Governance ("ESG") and Human Capital

Our People

As of December 31, 2021, we had 7,462 employees, including 4,477 in North America, 1,846 in APJ, and 1,139 in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa ("EMEA"). We provide a discussionwide range of backlogcompensation and seasonality, please referbenefits to Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussionour employees which enhance the workplace experience and Analysisdrive our Makes Work Life Better™ brand. In addition to salaries, these benefits (which vary by country/region) include annual bonuses, equity awards, a global employee stock purchase program, retirement savings plans, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings and flexible savings spending accounts, unlimited time away from work, employee assistance programs, and tuition reimbursement. In addition to our broad-based employee stock purchase program, we have targeted equity-based grants with vesting conditions to facilitate retention of Financial Conditionour employees. Our ability to attract and Resultsretain top talent is critical to our continued success as a business, and we were very pleased that our employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) in 2021 was 47.

Promoting diversity, equity and inclusion within our workforce is also a priority for Ceridian. In 2021, we established

6 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Operations”Contents

a company-wide Global Diversity Advisory Council that is comprised of employees from around the world, and we expanded the number of our inclusive-building YOUnity groups from 6 to 9—adding the Native and Indigenous People’s Network, the Ceridian Parenting Network, and the Asia Pacific Network. As of December 31, 2021, women represent approximately 49% of our global workforce, including approximately 43% of employees in manager-level roles and above, and approximately 38% in vice president-level roles and above. Employees from recently acquired companies ADAM HCM, Ascender, and Excelity are not included in this data, but will be included next year. In the United States, approximately 14% of our workforce is Black or African American, 11% is Asian, 6% is Hispanic or Latino, 2% is multiracial, and less than 1% is Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native and approximately 64% is White. In the United States, people of color represent approximately 24% of employees in manager-level roles and above, and approximately 22% of employees in vice president-level roles and above.

As we enter the third year of the pandemic, we continue to ensure that all necessary policies and procedures are in place at our facilities to protect employee health and safety. This includes those for vaccination, testing, masking, and physical distancing that conform to government requirements.

We are also committed to providing meaningful leadership and learning development opportunities to our workforce. Over 35,000 hours of in-person trainings, digital learning and webinars related to leadership and learning development topics were completed by nearly 93% of our employees as of December 31, 2021.

Responsible Innovation

We believe that tech for good and responsible innovation can have a positive impact on all stakeholders. Dayforce Wallet provides individuals with faster access to their earned pay, which enables them to cover both everyday expenses as well as urgent or unplanned costs.

Our Communities

Ceridian is committed to giving back to the communities in which we live and work. Through our charity, Ceridian Cares, we provide financial support to individuals and families struggling with basic needs and quality of life. In 2021, the organization donated over $1.1 million to people in need in the United States and Canada. Last year, we launched a new giving and volunteering platform for our workforce through which employees donated to over 480 non-profits in 12 countries.

We encourage you to review our 2022 annual Ceridian ESG Report for more detailed information regarding our ESG, and Human Capital goals, programs, and initiatives, which we anticipate will be available on our website at https://www.ceridian.com/company/corporate/corporateresponsibility by no later than March 31, 2022. Our website and the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, the website is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into, and is not considered part of, this Form 10-K.

Available Information

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy and information statements, Section 16 reports, and amendments to reports and any registration statements filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a), 14 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act are electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. These materials may be obtained electronically by accessing the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.  


We make available, free of charge on our website at http://investors.ceridian.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy and information statements, Section 16 reports, amendments to those reports, and other documents filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.   In addition, the following governance materialsSecurities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and are also available on ourthe SEC’s website at https:http://investors.ceridian.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents: (i)www.sec.gov.

Our fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our current charteramended and bylaws; (ii)restated bylaws, charters of our Acquisition and Finance, Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees of our Board of Directors (our “Board”); (iii), our Corporate Governance Guidelines;Guidelines, and (iv) our Code of Conduct, as well as any waivers from and amendments to our Code of Conduct.  Our corporateConduct are available on our website address is http:at https://www.ceridian.cominvestors.ceridian.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents. Our website and the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, the website is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into, and shouldis not be considered part of, this Form 10-K.

7 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the names and ages,Our executive officers as of February 15, 2019, and titles of the individuals who serve25, 2022 are as our executive officers.  Certain biographical information with respect to those executive officers follows the table.follows:

Name

Age

Position

David D. Ossip

5255

ChairmanChair and ChiefCo-Chief Executive Officer

Leagh E. Turner

4750

PresidentCo-Chief Executive Officer

Paul D. ElliottChristopher R. Armstrong

53

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Arthur GitajnNoémie C. Heuland

6644

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Ozzie J. GoldschmiedStephen H. Holdridge

4161

Executive Vice President and Chief TechnologyCustomer Officer

Scott A. KitchingJeffrey S. Jacobs

4946

Head of Accounting and Financial Reporting

Joseph B. Korngiebel

51

Executive Vice President, Chief Product and Technology Officer

William E. McDonald

57

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and AssistantCorporate Secretary

Lisa M. SterlingRakesh Subramanian

4649

Executive Vice President and Chief People and CultureRevenue Officer

Erik J. Zimmer

44

Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer

David D. Ossip

Mr. Ossip is our ChairmanChair and ChiefCo-Chief Executive Officer, positions heOfficer. Mr. Ossip has held the position of Chair since August 2015 and Co-Chief Executive Officer since February 2022. Mr. Ossip has served as Chief Executive Officer from July 2013 respectively.until February 2022. Mr. Ossip joined the Company following the Company’s acquisition of Dayforce Corporation in 2012, where he held the position of chief executive officer. Mr. Ossip is currentlyserves as a director of Dragoneer Growth Opportunities Corp. III, a NASDAQ listed special acquisition company. Mr. Ossip previously served as a director for Ossip Consulting Inc.Dragoneer Growth Opportunities Corp, a NYSE listed company, and OSDAC Corp.Dragoneer Growth Opportunities Corp II, a NASDAQ listed company.

Leagh E. Turner

Ms. Turner is our Co-Chief Executive Officer since February 2022 and has servedbeen a member of our Board of Directors since February 2022. Ms. Turner joined Ceridian in 2018, serving as our President sincefrom August 2018.2018 until February 2022 and Chief Operating Officer from February 2020 until February 2022. Prior to joining the Company,Ceridian, Ms. Turner held the position of global chief operating officer, strategic customer program of SAP, an enterprise software and programming company, from October 2016 to August 2018. In addition, Ms. Turner heldis a member of the positionsboard of acting chief operating officer of SAP Europe, Middle East, and Africa region from March 2017 to August 2017, acting president of SAP Canada Inc. from August 2015 to January 2016, chief operating officer of SAP Canada Inc. from February 2014 to October 2016, and vice president, sales central region of SAP Canada Inc. from July 2010 to February 2014.directors for Manulife Financial Corporation, a NYSE listed company.

Paul D. ElliottNoémie C. Heuland

Mr. Elliott is our Chief Operating Officer, a position he has held since April 2016. Additionally, Mr. Elliott served as our President from April 2016 until August 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Elliott held the position of chief operating officer at two of our affiliate companies, first at Ceridian Canada where Mr. Elliott held the position from August 2009 to February 2013, and then at Ceridian HCM, Inc., where Mr. Elliott held the position from March 2013 to March 2016.

Arthur Gitajn

Mr. GitajnMs. Heuland is our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, positions she has held since October 2020. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Heuland held the position of Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of SAP Latin America and Caribbean region since April 2018. In addition, Ms. Heuland held the positions of Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of SAP Latin America and Caribbean North and South from April 2015 to March 2018. Ms. Heuland is a certified public accountant (inactive).

Stephen H. Holdridge

Mr. Holdridge is our Executive Vice President, Chief Customer Officer since February 2022. Mr. Holdridge joined Ceridian in January 2020, serving as Global Head of Services until February 2022. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Holdridge held the position of Senior Executive Vice President, Worldwide Services at MicroStrategy, Inc. from November 2017 until July 2019. In addition, Mr. Holdridge held the position of Senior Vice President, Global Consulting Services at Infor (US), Inc., from June 2012 until October 2017.

Christopher R. Armstrong

Mr. Armstrong is our Executive Vice President, Chief Customer Officer, a position he has held since OctoberFebruary 2020. Mr. Armstrong joined Ceridian in 2004, and since then has held several commercial and operational leadership roles, including Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer from May 2019 until February 2020, Executive Vice President, Operations from March 2018 until May 2019, and Executive Vice President, Customer Support from April 2016 until March 2018.

8 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Jeffrey S. Jacobs

Mr. Jacobs is our Head of Accounting and Financial Reporting and serves as the principal accounting officer, positions he has held since May 2020. Mr. Jacobs has served as our Vice President, Finance since December 2016. Mr. Jacobs is a certified public accountant (inactive).

Joseph B. Korngiebel

Mr. Korngiebel is our Executive Vice President, Chief Product and Technology Officer, positions he has held since August 2020. Prior to joining us,the Company, Mr. GitajnKorngiebel held the position of chief financial officer for SAP Canadavarious positions at Workday, Inc. since March 2006, including Chief Technology Officer from May 2017 until July 2007 to January 20122020 and Senior Vice President, Technology and Innovation from January 2015 to September 2016,2014 until May 2017.

William E. McDonald

Mr. McDonald is our Executive Vice President and theGeneral Counsel, positions he has held since July 2021, and Corporate Secretary, a position of chief financial officer of SAP’s Europe, Middle East, and Africa regionhe has held since February 2016. Mr. McDonald served as Deputy General Counsel from February 2012 to December 2014.


Ozzie J. Goldschmied2016 until July 2021.

Rakesh Subramanian

Mr. GoldschmiedSubramanian is our Executive Vice President and Chief TechnologyRevenue Officer, positions he has held since October 2014. Mr. Goldschmied previously served as our senior vice president of research and development from February 2012 to September 2014. Mr. Goldschmied joined the Company following the Company’s acquisition of Dayforce Corporation in 2012, where he held the position of senior vice president of engineering.

Scott A. Kitching

Mr. Kitching is our Executive Vice President, a position he has held since February 2016, and General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, positions he has held since December 2013.April 2021. Prior to that time,joining the Company, Mr. KitchingSubramanian held the position of executive vice president and general counselvarious positions at our affiliate subsidiary Ceridian Canada from May 2003 to December 2013.

Lisa M. Sterling

Ms. Sterling is our ExecutiveSAP America, Inc., beginning in 2005, most recently as Senior Vice President and Chief PeopleManaging Director from July 2017 until April 2021, and Culture Officer, positions she has held since March 2016. Ms. Sterling previously served as our vice president of product strategy from June 2015 to March 2016. Prior to joining us, Ms. Sterling was a partner and talent technology solutions leader at Mercer LLC from March 2013 to May 2015. Prior to that, Ms. Sterling served as the head of people engagement for Ultimate Software from February 2010 to March 2013.

Erik J. Zimmer

Mr. Zimmer is our ExecutiveRegional Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer, positions he has held since August 2018. Mr. Zimmer previously served as a managing directorfrom January 2014 until June 2017.

9 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. from February 2011 to August 2018.Contents



Item 1A. RiskRisk Factors.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We have a history of lossesOur business ordinarily encounters and negative cash flows from operating activities, and we may not be able to attain or to maintain profitability or positive cash flows from operating activities in the future.

We have incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities over the last few years as we made substantial investments in developing, launching, and selling our Cloud solutions. In addition, our highly leveraged capital structure has had a negative effect on our profitability. As a result, we have incurred net losses of $92.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2016, $9.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2017, and $63.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2018, we had an accumulated deficit of $419.3 million. We incurred negative cash flows from operating activities of $75.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2016, $39.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 and positive cash flows from operating activities of $9.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2018. To the extent we are successful in increasing our Cloud customer base, we may also incur increased net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities because costs associated with acquiring and implementing new Cloud customers are generally incurred up front, while subscription revenues are generally recognized ratably over the terms of the agreements. Our recent growth in revenues may not be indicative of our future performance.

We also expect our expenses to increase in the future due to anticipated increases in sales, general, and administrative expenses, including expenses associated with being a public company, and product development and management expenses, which could impact our ability to achieve or to sustain profitability or positive cash flows from operating activities in the future. Additionally, while the majority of our revenue comes from fees charged for use of the software, we are developing new products and services, which may initially have a lower profit margin than our existing Cloud solutions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Although we believe we will be able to reach profitability and attain positive cash flows from operating activities in the next few years, we cannot provide any assurance that we will able to do so in the future.

The markets in which we participate are highly competitive, and if we do not compete effectively, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The markets in which we participate are highly competitive, and competition could intensify in the future. We believe the principal competitive factors in our market include breadth and depth of product functionality, scalability and reliability of applications, robust workforce management, comprehensive tax services, modern and innovative cloud technology platforms combined with an intuitive user experience, multi-country and jurisdiction domain expertise in payroll and HCM, quality of implementation and customer service, integration with a wide variety of third party applications and systems, total cost of ownership and ROI, brand awareness, and reputation, pricing and distribution. We face a variety of competitors,addresses risks, some of which are long-established providers of HCM solutions. Many ofcan cause our future results to be different than we currently anticipate. The risk factors described below represent our current and potential competitors are larger, have greater name recognition, longer operating histories, larger marketing budgets, and significantly greater resources than we do,view of some of the most important risks facing our business and are ableimportant to devote greater resources to the development, promotion,its understanding. The following information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and saleAnalysis of their productsFinancial Condition and services. SomeResults of our competitors could offer HCM solutions bundled as part of a larger product offering. Furthermore, our current or potential competitors may be acquired by third parties with greater available resourcesOperations, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk and the ability to initiate or to withstand substantial price competition. In addition, many of our competitors have established marketing relationships, access to larger customer bases,consolidated financial statements and major distribution agreements with consultants, system integrators, and resellers. Our competitors may also establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties that may further enhance their product offerings or resources.

In order to capitalizerelated notes included in this Annual Report on customer demand for cloud applications, legacy vendors are modernizing and expanding their applications through cloud acquisitions and organic development. Legacy vendors may also seek to partner with other leading cloud HCM providers. We also face competition from vendors selling custom software and point solutions, some of which offer cloud solutions. Our competitors include, without limitation:  ADP, Ultimate Software, and Workday for HCM; Kronos for workforce management; and Cornerstone OnDemand for talent management.  In addition, other companies, such as NetSuite and Microsoft, that provide cloud applications in different target markets, may develop applications or acquire companies that operate in our target markets, and some potential customers may elect to develop their own internal applications. Some large businesses may be hesitant to adopt cloud applications such as ours and prefer to upgrade the more familiar applications offered by these vendors that are deployed on-premise, such as Oracle and SAP. Our competitors could offer HCM solutions on a standalone basis at a low price or bundled as part of a larger product sale. With the introduction of new technologies and market entrants, competition could intensify in the future.


If our competitors’ products, services, or technologies become more accepted than our applications, if they are successful in bringing their products or services to market earlier than ours, or if their products or services are more technologically capable than ours, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, some of our competitors may offer their products and services at a lower price. If we are unable to achieve our target pricing levels or if we experience significant pricing pressures, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our growth strategy has focused on developing our Cloud solutions, which have experienced rapid revenue growth in recent periods that has been offset by revenue declines in our Bureau solutions. If we fail to manage our growth effectively or if our strategy is not successful, we may be unable to execute our business plan, to maintain high levels of service, or to adequately address competitive challenges.

We have recently experienced a period of rapid growth in our operations related to our Cloud solutions. In particular, our recurring services revenue for our Cloud solutions has continued to increase while our recurring services revenue for our Bureau solutions has continued to decline. As we implement our growth strategy for our Cloud solutions, we will continue to migrate employees and resources from our Bureau solutions to our Cloud solutions. Additionally, we are continuing to invest in the infrastructure shared by our Bureau and Cloud solutions, although we are no longer marketing our Bureau solutions to new customers. The growth of our Cloud solutions has placed, and future growth will place, a significant strain on our management, administrative, operational, and financial infrastructure. In order to manage this growth effectively, we will need to continue to improve our operational, financial, and management controls, and our reporting systems and procedures. Failure to effectively manage growth and failure to achieve our growth strategy could result in difficulty or delays in implementing customers, declines in quality or customer satisfaction, increases in costs, difficulties in introducing new features, or other operational difficulties; and any of these difficulties could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our Bureau solutions, which comprise a significant portion of our revenue, may decline at a rate faster than we anticipate, and we may not be able to successfully migrate our Bureau customers to our Cloud solutions or to offset the decline in Bureau revenue with Cloud revenue.

Our growth strategy is focused on the growth and expansion of our Cloud solutions; however, a portion of our revenue continues to be derived from our Bureau customers. We generally ceased marketing our Bureau solutions to new customers in the United States in 2012, and since that time have maintained the Bureau applications for existing customers while migrating customers to our Cloud solutions. Maintenance of our Bureau business requires investment, specifically with respect to compliance updates and security controls. If our investments are not sufficient to adequately update our Bureau solutions, such solutions may lose market acceptance and we may face security vulnerabilities.

In addition, we have marketed our Cloud solutions to our Bureau customers, and some of our Bureau customers have migrated to our Cloud solutions, but there is no guarantee that our remaining Bureau customers will migrate to our Cloud solutions. If such Bureau customers do not migrate, we may lose them in the future or we may be required to make ongoing investments to serve a smaller pool of customers. If our revenue from our Bureau solutions declines at a rate faster than anticipated, we are required to make significant investments in infrastructure shared by our Bureau and Cloud solutions that are not offset by increased revenue, we are not able to successfully convert the remaining Bureau customers to our Cloud solutions, or our Cloud solutions revenue does not grow fast enough to offset the decline in our Bureau solutions revenue, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


If the market for enterprise cloud computing develops slower than we expect or declines, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The enterprise cloud computing market is not as mature as the market for on-premise enterprise software, and it is uncertain whether cloud computing will achieve and sustain high levels of customer demand and market acceptance. Our success will depend to a substantial extent on the widespread adoption of cloud computing in general, and of HCM solutions in particular. Many enterprises have invested substantial personnel and financial resources to integrate traditional enterprise software into their businesses and therefore may be reluctant or unwilling to migrate to cloud computing. It is difficult to predict customer adoption rates and demand for our applications, the future growth rate and size of the cloud computing market, or the entry of competitive applications. The expansion of the cloud computing market depends onForm 10-K. This discussion includes a number of factors,forward-looking statements. In addressing these risks, you should also refer to the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the cost, performance,consolidated financial statements and perceived value associated with cloud computing, as well as the ability of cloud computing companies to address security and privacy concerns. If we or other cloud computing providers experience security incidents, loss of customer data, disruptions in delivery, or other problems, the market for cloud computing applications as a whole, including our applications, may be negatively affected. If cloud computing does not achieve widespread adoption or there is a reduction in demand for cloud computing caused by a lack of customer acceptance, technological challenges, weakening economic conditions, security or privacy concerns, competing technologies and products, reductions in corporate spending, or otherwise, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.related notes.

Our revenues from our Cloud solutions have grown substantially over the last few years. Our efforts to increase use of our Cloud solutions and our other applications may not succeed and may reduce our revenue growth rate.

Our revenues from our Cloud solutions have grown substantially over the last few years. Our total Cloud revenues grew from $297.8 million in 2016 to $404.3 million in 2017 and $534.3 million in 2018, a growth rate of 35.8% and 32.2%, respectively. Any factor adversely affecting sales of our Cloud solutions, including application release cycles, delays, or failures in new product functionality, market acceptance, product competition, performance and reliability, reputation, price competition, and economic and market conditions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our participation in new markets for native payroll, and application expansion in succession management, learning management, and compensation management, is relatively new, and it is uncertain whether these areas will ever result in significant revenues for us. Further, the entry into new markets or the introduction of new features, functionality, or applications beyond our current markets and functionality may not be successful.

Our quarterly results of operations have and may continue to fluctuate significantly and may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business.

Our quarterly results of operations, including the levels of our revenues, gross margin, profitability, cash flow, and deferred revenue, has varied and may vary significantly in the future, and period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations may not be meaningful. Accordingly, the results of any one quarter should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. Our quarterly financial results may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control, and as a result, may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business. Fluctuation in quarterly results may negatively impact the value of our common stock. Factors that may cause fluctuations in our quarterly financial results include, without limitation:

These factors include: our ability to attract and retain new Cloud customers;

our ability to replace declining Bureau revenue with Cloud revenue;

the addition or loss of largeand current Cloud customers, including through acquisitionsas well as Dayforce Wallet customers; changes on services or consolidations;

the addition or losspricing impacting our customer contracts; seasonal variations in sales of employees byand revenue from our Cloud customers;

the timing and number of paydays in a period;

the timing of recognition of revenues;

the tenure ofapplications, changes on our Cloud customers during that period;

the amount and timing of operating expenses related to the maintenance and expansion of our business including new acquired businesses, operations, and infrastructure;

network outages or security breaches;

and general economic, industry, and market conditions;

customer renewal rates;

increasesconditions, including the addition or decreasesloss of employees by our Cloud customers who generally pay on a “per employee per month” basis, interest rates and accounting rules.

Our business plan is focused on an aggressive growth strategy. If we fail to manage our growth effectively or if our strategy is not successful, we may be unable to execute our business plan, to maintain high levels of service, or to adequately address competitive challenges.

We have and we believe we will continue to experience a period of rapid growth in the number of elementsour operations and Cloud solutions. The growth of our servicesoperations and Cloud solutions has and may continue to place a strain on our management, administrative, operational, technological and financial infrastructure. In order to manage our growth effectively, we will need to continuously improve our operational, financial, technological and management systems, and our internal controls, reporting systems and procedures to scaled global capabilities which may require investment as we grow and could result in disruption as we transform. Failure to effectively manage growth or pricing changes uponto achieve our growth strategy could result in problems or delays in implementing customers, declines in quality or customer satisfaction, increases in costs, complications in introducing new features, or other operational challenges; and any renewals of customer agreements;

changes inthese difficulties could have a material adverse effect on our pricing policies or thosebusiness, financial condition, and results of operations.

Revenues from our Cloud solutions have grown substantially over the last few years. Our efforts to continue increasing use of our competitors;Cloud solutions and our other applications, including the Dayforce Wallet, may not succeed and may reduce our revenue growth rate.


the mix of applications sold during a period;

seasonal variationsOur ability to continue to grow the revenues from our Cloud solutions through execution against our growth levers depends on the quality of our platform and solutions, and our ability to design our Cloud solutions to meet consumer demand; and our ability to increase sales from existing customers depends on our customers’ satisfaction with our product and need for additional solutions. Our participation in new markets for native payroll, and application expansion in various modules and features, including the Dayforce Wallet, is relatively new, and it is uncertain whether these areas will ever result in significant revenues for us. Further, the entry into new markets or the introduction of new features, functionality, or applications beyond our current markets and functionality may not be successful. If we are unable to sell our Cloud solutions, including the Dayforce Wallet, into new markets or to further penetrate existing markets, or to increase sales from existing customers, our revenue may not grow as expected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any factor adversely affecting sales of our applications, which has historically been highestCloud solutions, including application release cycles, delays, or failures in the fourth quarternew product functionality, market acceptance, product competition, performance and reliability, reputation, price competition, and economic and market conditions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of a calendar year;operations.

fluctuation in market interest rates, which impacts debt interest expense as well as float revenue;10 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


the timing and successTable of new application and service introductions by us or our competitors or any other change in the competitive dynamics of our industry, including consolidation among competitors, customers, or strategic partners; andContents

the impact of new accounting rules.

If we are not able to provide new or enhanced functionality and features or keep pace with rapid technological changes and evolving industry standards, we willmay not be able to remain competitivesatisfy our aggressive growth strategy and the demand for our services may decline.

Our ability to increase revenue will likely decline, which could have a material adverse effectdepend, in large part, on our business, financial condition,ability to develop our existing Cloud solutions to drive sales into new markets around the world, to further penetrate our existing markets, and results of operations.

The markets in which we operate are characterized by changes due to rapid technological advances, additional qualification requirements related to technological challenges, and evolving industry standards and changes inincrease sales from existing customers who do not utilize the regulatory and legislative environment.full Dayforce suite. Our future success, and the success of our growth strategy, will depend upon our ability to anticipate and to adapt to changes in technology and industry standards, and to effectively develop, to introduce, to market, and to gain broad acceptance of new productservice offerings and service enhancements incorporating the latest technological advancements. We may not be able to successfully provide new or enhanced functionality and features for our existing solutions that achieve market acceptance or that keep pace with rapid technological developments. For example, we are focused on enhancing the features and functionality of our HCM solutionsOur attempts to enhance their utility for larger customers with complex, dynamic, and global operations. The success ofdevelop new or enhanced functionality may be expensive and features depends on several factors, including their overall effectiveness and the timely completion, introduction, and market acceptance of the enhancements, new features, or applications.impact our profitability. Failure in this regard may significantly impaira material adverse effect on our business, growth strategy, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our international growth strategy has and will expose us to risks inherent in international sales and operations.

One of our growth levers is international sales growth into new markets and we anticipate that customers and potential customers may increasingly require and demand that a single vendor provide HCM solutions and services for their employees in a number of countries. Our global recent expansion, and any future expansion into new markets, has and will require commensurate ongoing expansion of our monitoring of local laws and regulations, which increases our costs as well as the risk of the product not incorporating in a timely fashion or at all the necessary changes to enable a customer to be compliant with such laws. Additionally, our international operations are subject to risks that could adversely affect those operations or our business as a whole, including but not limited to the costs of establishing a market presence, localizing product and service offerings for foreign customers, difficulties in managing and staffing international operations, and increased expenses related to introducing corporate policies and controls in our international operations and increased reliance on partners to provide services in additional geographies. As part of our international strategy, we work with partners to perform services in certain geographies where we do not currently have international operations or the particular service required by our customers, as a result we may experience business impact if our partners do not carry out the services as committed, including potential for reduced margin from additional expense or impact to customer relationships.

Our international growth strategy has and may continue to include growth via acquisition, in which case our growth may also be dependent on our ability to transition acquired customers from current products to Dayforce or to increase sales by addressing broader HCM needs with additional modules of Dayforce.

If we are unable to provide the required services on a multinational basis, or if we are unable to effectively manage our international expansion, we could be subject to negative customer experiences, harm to our reputation or loss of customers, claims for any fines, penalties or other damages suffered by our customer, and other financial harm, including fines, penalties, or other damages suffered by us directly, which would negatively impact revenue growth. In addition, becauseand earnings. Although we have a multinational strategy, additional investment and efforts may be necessary to implement such strategy. Some of our solutionsbusiness partners also have international operations and are designedsubject to operatethe risks described above.

The markets in which we participate are highly competitive, and if we do not compete effectively, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The markets in which we participate are highly competitive, and competition could intensify in the future. We believe the principal competitive factors in our market include: breadth and depth of product functionality, scalability and reliability of applications, robust workforce management, comprehensive tax services, modern and innovative cloud technology platforms combined with an intuitive user experience, multi-country and jurisdiction domain expertise in payroll and HCM, quality of implementation and customer service, integration with a wide variety of third party applications and systems, total cost of ownership and return on investment, brand awareness, and reputation, pricing and distribution.

We face a variety of competitors, some of which are long-established providers of HCM solutions. Many of our current and potential competitors are larger, have greater name recognition, longer operating histories, larger marketing budgets, and significantly greater resources than we do, and are able to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and sale of their products and services. Some of our competitors do or could offer HCM solutions bundled as part of a larger product offering. Furthermore, our current or potential competitors may be acquired by third parties with greater available resources and the ability to initiate or to withstand substantial price competition. In addition, many of our competitors have established marketing relationships, access to larger customer bases, and major distribution

11 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

agreements with consultants, system integrators, and resellers. Our competitors may also establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties that may further enhance their product offerings or resources. Although we have a global partnership strategy, additional investment and efforts will be necessary to implement such a strategy.

If our competitors’ products, services, or technologies become more accepted than our applications are today, if they are successful in bringing their products or services to market earlier than ours, or if their products or services are more technologically capable than ours, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, some of our competitors may offer their products and services at a lower price compared to our products or their current pricing impacting our ability to achieve our target pricing. If we are unable to achieve our target pricing levels or if we experience significant pricing pressures, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our aging software infrastructure, technology, and sophistication of these systems may lead to increased costs, vulnerability to cyber-attack, or disruptions in operations that could have a material adverse effect on our business, market brand, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business continues to demand the use of sophisticated systems and technology, including technology infrastructure assets. These systems and technologies must be refined, updated and/or replaced with more advanced systems on a regular basis in order for us to meet both our customers’ and employees’ demands and expectations. Some of the crucial platforms on which we willhost our back office and bureau systems are aged and need to continuously modifybe replaced or are in the process of being replaced. If we are unable to replace our aged, crucial platforms, if some or all these platforms fail to operate due to a software error or infrastructure failure, if we fail to continue to refine and enhanceupdate our solutions to keep pace with changes in internet-related hardware, iOS,systems and other software, and communication, browser, and database technologies. We may not be successful in developing these new or enhanced functionality and features, or in bringing them to market intechnologies on a timely fashion. Ifbasis or within reasonable cost parameters, if we do not continueappropriately and timely train our employees to innovate andoperate any of these new systems, or we are unable to deliver high-quality, technologically advanced products and services,appropriately protect any of these systems, we will not remain competitive,could suffer the loss of data, vulnerabilities to cyber-attack, system outages or other performance problems, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, uncertainties about the timing and nature of new functionality, or new functionality to existing platforms or technologies, could increase our research and development expenses. Any failure of our applications to operate effectively with future network platforms and technologies could reduce the demand for our applications, result in customer dissatisfaction, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

An information security breach of our systems or the loss of, or unauthorized access to, customer information or sensitive company information; the failure to comply with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) ongoing consent order regarding data protection,protection; or a system disruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, market brand, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business is dependent on our payroll, transaction, financial, accounting, and other data processing systems. We rely on these systems, which are maintained both internally and externally at third parties, to process, on a daily and time sensitive basis, a large number of complicated transactions. We, both through our internal systems and systems maintained by third parties, electronically receive, process, store, and transmit data and personally identifiablepersonal information (“PII”) about our customers and their employees, as well as our vendors and other business partners, including names, social security numbers, and checking account numbers.partners. We keep this information confidential. However, both our internal and third party partners’ websites, networks, applications and technologies, and other information systems may be targeted for sabotage, disruption, or data misappropriation. Further, as we grow by acquisition, these risks become acute in the period following the acquisition, as we set about integrating the acquisition target’s systems into ours. Additionally, as we retire our legacy products like our bureau payroll services, we are decreasing investments in maintaining those systems which creates the potential for a potential security breach of one of those systems. The uninterrupted operation of our information systems and our ability to maintain the confidentiality of PIIpersonal information and other customer and individual and company information that resides on our systems are critical to the successful operation of our business. While we have information securityWe, and our third party providers, maintain systems and processes designed to protect this data and maintain business continuity, programs, these plans may not be sufficient to ensurebut notwithstanding such protective measures, there is a risk of intrusion, cyber-attacks or tampering that could compromise the uninterrupted operationintegrity and privacy of our systems or to prevent unauthorized access to the systems by unauthorized third parties. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. These concerns about information security are increased with the mounting sophistication of social engineering. Our network security hardening may be bypassed by phishing and other social engineering techniques that seek to use end user behaviors to distribute computer viruses and malware into our systems, which might disrupt our delivery of services and make them unavailable, and might also result in the disclosure or misappropriation of PII or other confidential or sensitive information. In addition, a significant cyber security breach could prevent or delay our ability to process payment transactions.


this data. Any information security breach in our business processes or of our processing systems (whether they are maintained internally or externally at third parties) has the potential to impact our customer information and sensitive company information, including our financial reporting capabilities, which could result in the potential loss of business and our ability to accurately report financial results. If any of these systems fail to operate properly or become disabled even for a brief period of time, we could potentially miss a critical filing period, resulting in potential fees and penalties, or lose control of customer data, all of which could result in financial loss, a disruption of our businesses,business, liability to customers, regulatory intervention, or damage to our reputation. The continued occurrence of high-profile data breaches provides evidence of an external environment increasingly hostile

We are subject to information security. If our security measures are breached as a result of third party action, employee or subcontractor error, malfeasance or otherwise, and, astwenty-year consent order with the FTC that became final in June 2011 stemming from a result, someone obtains unauthorized access to customer data, our reputation may be damaged, our business may suffer, and we could incur significant liability. We may also experience security breaches that may remain undetected for an extended period of time. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and are growing increasingly sophisticated. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures.

This environment demands that we continuously improve our design and coordination of security controls throughout the company. Despite these efforts, it is possible that our security controls over data, training, and other practices we follow may not prevent the improper disclosure of PII or other confidential information. Any issue of data privacy as it relates to unauthorized access to or loss of customer and/or employee information could result in the potential loss of business, damage to our market reputation, litigation, and regulatory investigation and penalties. For example, in December 2009 a criminal hackedhack into our discontinued U.S. payroll application. Following receipt of an “access letter” in May 2010 from the FTC for a non-public review of the matter, we worked with the FTC and entered into a twenty-year consent order which became final in June 2011. We conceded no wrongdoing in the order and we were not subject to any monetary fines or penalties. However, in connection with the order, we are required to,

12 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

among other things, maintain a comprehensive information security program that is reasonable and appropriate for our size and complexity, and for the type of PIIpersonal information we collect. We are also required to have portions of our security program, which apply to certain segments of our U.S. business, reviewed by an independent third party on a biennial basis. Maintaining, updating, monitoring, and revising an information security program in an effort to ensure that it remains reasonable and appropriate in light of changes in security threats, changes in technology, and security vulnerabilities that arise from legacy systems is time-consuming and complex, and is an ongoing effort.

There may be other such security vulnerabilities that come to our attention. The independent third party that reviews our security program pursuant to the FTC consent order may determine that the existence of vulnerabilities in our security controls or the failure to remedy them in a timeframe they deem appropriate means that our security program does not provide a reasonable level of assurance that the security, confidentiality, and integrity of PII is protected by Ceridian (or that there was a failure to protect at some point in the reporting period). While we have taken and continue to take steps to ensure compliance with the consent order, if we are determined not to be in compliance with the consent order, or if any new breaches of security occur, the FTC may take enforcement actions or other parties may initiate a lawsuit. Any such resulting fines and penalties could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial results, and any reputational damage therefrom could adversely affect our relationships with our existing customers and our ability to attain new customers. Our continued investment in the security of our technology systems, continued efforts to improve the controls within our technology systems, business processes improvements and the enhancements to our culture of information security may not successfully prevent attempts to breach our security or unauthorized access to PII or other confidential, sensitive or proprietary information. In addition, in the event of a catastrophic occurrence, either natural or man-made, our ability to protect our infrastructure, including PII and other customer data, and to maintain ongoing operations could be significantly impaired. Our business continuity and disaster recovery plans and strategies may not be successful in mitigating the effects of a catastrophic occurrence. Insurance may be inadequate or may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, our insurance policies may not cover all claims made against us, and defending a suit,lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be costly, and divert management’s attention. Ifattention, or damage our security is breached, if PII or other confidential information is accessed, if we fail to comply with the consent order or if we experience a catastrophic occurrence, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.reputation.

Our services present the potential for identity theft, embezzlement, or other similar illegal behavior by our employees with respect to third parties.

The services offered by us generally require or involve collecting PII of our customers and / or their employees, such as their full names, birth dates, addresses, employer records, tax information, social security numbers, and bank account information. This information can be used by criminals to commit identity theft, to impersonate third parties, or to otherwise gain access to the data or funds of an individual. If any of our employees take, convert, or misuse such PII, funds or other documents or data, we could be liable for damages, and our business reputation could be damaged or destroyed. Moreover, if we fail to adequately prevent third parties from accessing PII and/or business information and using that information to commit identity theft, we might face legal liabilities and other losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Our solutions and our business are subject to a variety of U.S. and internationalother countries’ laws and regulations, including those regarding privacy, data protection, and information security. Any failure by us or our third party service providers, as well as the failure of our platform or services, to comply with applicablethese laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

WeFailure to comply with privacy, data protection and information security laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition, or have other adverse consequences. These laws, which are not uniform, govern the collection, storage, hosting, transfer (including in some cases, the transfer outside the country of collection), use, disclosure, security, retention and destruction of personal information; they require us to give notice to individuals of privacy practices; give individuals certain access and correction rights with respect to their personal information; and regulate the use or disclosure of personal information for secondary purposes such as marketing. Under certain circumstances, some of these laws require us to provide notification to affected individuals, clients, data protection authorities and/or other regulators in the event of a data breach. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information among the Company and its subsidiaries. The European Union (the “EU”) General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”), and the California Consumer Protection Act (the “CCPA”), are among the most comprehensive of these laws. The number of related laws and regulations we are subject to a varietycontinue to increase as we enter new markets in Europe, Asia Pacific, and Latin America, and as we continue our entry into the consumer space through our Wallet offering. Restrictions on transfers of U.S. and internationalpersonal information from one geography to another continue to consolidate. Complying with these laws and regulations, including regulation by various federal government agencies,requirements, including the FTC,enhanced obligations imposed by the GDPR and statethe CCPA, has resulted in significant costs to our business and local agencies.may continue to require us to amend certain of our business practices. Further, enforcement actions and investigations by regulatory authorities related to data security incidents and privacy violations continue to increase. The future enactment of more restrictive laws, rules or regulations and/or future enforcement actions or investigations could have a material adverse impact on us through increased costs or restrictions on our businesses and noncompliance could result in significant regulatory penalties and legal liability and damage our reputation. Restrictions on cross border data flows and data residency requirements may negatively impact our clients’ and our own ability to transfer personal information to the United States and various stateother countries as part of our provision of services, and foreign governments have adopted or proposed limitations on, or requirements regarding, the collection, distribution, use, security, and storagein support of PII of individuals; and the FTC and many state attorneys general are applying federal and state consumer protection laws to impose standards on the online collection, use and dissemination of data. Self-regulatory obligations, other industry standards, policies, and other legal obligations may apply to our collection, distribution, use, security, or storage of PII or other data relating to individuals.own operations, potentially impacting revenues. In addition, most states and some foreign governments have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving certain typesevents and concerns about privacy abuses by other companies are changing consumer and social expectations for enhanced privacy and data protection. As a result, even the perception of PII. These obligationsnoncompliance, whether or not valid, may be interpreted and applied in an inconsistent manner from one jurisdictiondamage our reputation.

Customers depend on our solutions to another and may conflict with one another, other regulatory requirements, or our internal practices. Any failure or perceived failure by usassist them to comply with U.S., E.U.,applicable laws, which requires us and our third party providers to constantly monitor applicable laws and to make applicable changes to our solutions. If our solutions have not been updated to enable the customer to comply with applicable laws or other foreign privacy or security laws, regulations, policies, industry standards, or legal obligations, or any security incident that results in the unauthorized accesswe fail to or acquisition, release, or transfer of, PII may result in governmental enforcement actions, litigation, fines and penalties, or adverse publicity andupdate our solutions on a timely basis, it could cause our customers to lose trust in us, which could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Customers use on our solutions to assist them to comply with payroll, HR, and other applicable laws for which the solutions are intended for use. We expectand our third party providers must monitor all applicable laws and as such laws expand, evolve, or are amended in any way, and when new regulations or laws are implemented, we may be required to modify our solutions to assist our customers to comply with such new regulations or laws, which requires an investment of our time and resources. We are also reliant on our third party providers to modify the solutions that therethey provide to our customers as part of our solutions to comply with changes to such laws and regulations. The number of laws and

13 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

regulations that we are required to monitor has and will continue to be new proposed laws, regulations,increase as we expand both the geographic regions in which the solutions are offered and industry standards concerning privacy, data protectionthe types of products we offer to customers. These risks have become exacerbated as we expand by acquisition and information securityare most acute in the United States, Canada,period following the European Union,acquisition as we integrate the acquired business and other jurisdictions, and we cannot yet determineits systems. In the impact such future laws, regulations, and standards may have onevent our business. For example, in May 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation came into force, bringing with itsolutions fail to enable a complete overhaul of E.U. data protection laws: the new rules supersede E.U. data protection legislation, impose more stringent E.U. data protection requirements, and provide for greater penalties for non-compliance. Changing definitions of what constitutes PII may also limit or inhibit our ability to operate or to expand our business, including limiting strategic partnerships that may involve the sharing of data. Also, some jurisdictions require that certain types of data be retained on servers within these jurisdictions. Our failurecustomer to comply with applicable laws, directives, and regulations may result in enforcement action against us, including fines and imprisonment, and damagewe are subject to negative customer experiences, harm to our reputation or loss of customers, claims for any offines, penalties or other damages suffered by our customer, and other financial harm, including fines, penalties or other damages suffered by us directly.

If our current or future applications fail to perform properly, our reputation could be adversely affected, our market share could decline, and we could be subject to liability claims, which maycould have ana material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results. Further,results of operations.

Our applications are inherently complex and may contain material defects or errors that we are not yet aware of. Because of the large amount of data that we collect and manage, it is possible that failures or errors in October 2015,our systems could result in data loss or corruption or cause the European Court of Justice issued a ruling invalidating the U.S.-E.U. Safe Harbor Framework, which facilitated transfers of PIIinformation that we collect to the United States in compliance with applicable E.U. data protection laws. In July 2016, the E.U. and the U.S. political authorities adopted the E.U.-U.S. Privacy Shield, replacing the Safe Harbor Framework and providing a new mechanism for companiesbe incomplete or to transfer E.U. PII to the United States. U.S. organizations wishing to self-certify under the Privacy Shield must pledge their compliance with its seven core and sixteen supplemental principles, which are based on European Data Protection Law.

If our service is perceived to cause, or is otherwise unfavorably associated with, violations of privacy or data security requirements, it may subject us orcontain inaccuracies that our customers to public criticism and potential legal liability. Public concerns regarding PII processing, privacy and security mayregard as significant. Any defects in functionality or that cause someinterruptions in the availability of our customers’ end usersapplications could result in reputational, competitive, operational or other business harm as well as financial costs and regulatory action, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, the costs incurred in correcting any material defects or errors might be substantial. While we conduct standard due diligence during our acquisition process, these risks are heightened as we grow by acquisition and dedicate resources to be less likely to visit their websitesintegrating the acquisition target’s systems into ours and take on the vulnerabilities that may exist at the acquisition target.

Regulatory requirements placed on our software and services could impose increased costs on us, delay or otherwise interact with them. If enough end users choose not to visitprevent our customers’ websitesintroduction of new products and services, and impair the function or otherwise interact with them, our customers could stop using our platform. This, in turn, may reduce the value of our existing products and services.

Our products and services are subject to increasing regulatory requirements, and slowas these requirements proliferate, we are required to change or eliminateadapt to comply. Changing regulatory requirements might render our services obsolete or might block us from developing new products and services. This might in turn impose additional costs upon us to comply or to further develop our products and services. Changing regulatory requirements can make introduction of new services more costly or more time-consuming than we currently anticipate and could even prevent introduction by us of new services or cause the continuation of our existing services to become more costly.

Federal, state or foreign government bodies or agencies have in the past adopted, and may in the future adopt, laws or regulations affecting the use of the Internet as a commercial medium. Future changes in these laws or regulations could require us to modify our applications in order to comply with these changes. In addition, government agencies or private organizations may begin to impose taxes, fees, or other charges for accessing the Internet or commerce conducted via the Internet. These laws or charges could limit the growth of our business. Existing and potential privacy laws and regulations concerning privacy and data security and increasing sensitivity of consumers to unauthorized processing of PII may create negative public reactions to technologies, products, and servicesInternet-related commerce or communications generally, resulting in reductions in the demand for Internet-based applications such as ours.ours, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

EvolvingIf we fail to manage our technical operations infrastructure, our existing customers may experience service outages, and changing definitions of what constitutes PII and / or “Personal Data” withinour new customers may experience delays in the United States, Canada, the European Union, and elsewhere, especially relating to the classification of internet protocol, or IP addresses, machine or device identification numbers, location data and other information, may limit or inhibit our ability to operate or to expand our business. Future laws, regulations, standards and other obligations could impair our ability to collect or to use information that we utilize to provide email delivery and marketing services to our customers, thereby impairing our ability to maintain and to grow our customer base and to increase revenue. Future restrictions on the collection, use, sharing, or disclosure of our customers’ data or additional requirements for express or implied consent of customers for the use and disclosure of such information may limit our ability to develop new services and features.


Privacy concerns and laws or other domestic or foreign data protection regulations may reduce the effectivenessimplementation of our applications, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our customers can useWe have experienced and will continue to experience significant growth in the number of users, transactions, and data that our applicationsoperations infrastructure supports, including the acquisition of new systems via strategic transactions. We seek to collect,maintain sufficient excess capacity in our operations infrastructure to use, and to store PII regarding their employees, independent contractors, and job applicants. Federal, state, and foreign government bodies and agencies have adopted, are considering adopting, or may adopt laws and regulations regardingmeet the collection, use, storage and disclosureneeds of PII obtained from individuals. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, such laws and regulations that are applicable to the businessesall of our customers and to facilitate the rapid provision of new customer activations and the expansion of existing customer activations. In addition, we need to continue to properly manage our technological operations infrastructure to support version control, changes in hardware and software parameters, and the evolution of our applications. We have experienced, and may in the future experience, website disruptions, outages, and other performance problems. These problems may be caused by a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, viruses, security attacks, fraud, increased resource consumption from expansion or modification to our business directly,Dayforce code, spikes in customer usage, and denial of service issues. The risks of these problems occurring may limitbe exacerbated by our strategic acquisitions, especially in the useperiod following the acquisition as we integrate the acquisition target’s systems into ours, as well as our aging technology infrastructure which in some cases is supported by older platforms. In some instances, we may not be able to identify the

14 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

cause or causes of these performance problems within an acceptable period of time. If we do not accurately predict our infrastructure requirements, our existing customers may experience service outages that may subject them to financial penalties, causing us to incur financial liabilities and adoption ofcustomer losses; and our applications and reduce overall demand, or leadoperations infrastructure may fail to significant fines, penalties, or liabilities for any non-compliancekeep pace with such privacy laws. Furthermore, privacy concerns may cause our customers’ workers to resist providing PII necessary to allow ourincreased sales, causing new customers to use our applications effectively. Even the perception of privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may inhibit market adoption of our applications in certain industries.

All of these domestic and international legislative and regulatory initiatives may adversely affect our customers’ abilityexperience delays as we seek to process, to handle, to store, to use, and to transmit demographic information and PII from their employees, independent contractors, job applicants, customers, and suppliers, which could reduce demand for our applications. The European Union and many countries in Europe have stringent privacy laws and regulations, which may impact our ability to profitably operate in certain European countries.

Further, international data protection regulations trending toward increased localized data residency rules make transfers from outside the regulation’s jurisdiction increasingly complex and may impact our ability to deliver solutions that meet all customers’ needs. If the processing of PII were to be further curtailed in this manner, our solutions could be less effective, which may reduce demand for our applications,obtain additional capacity, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our growth depends in part on the success of our strategic relationships with third parties who provide us with services and license us software for use in or with both our applications and our internal operations.

In additionorder to government activity, privacy advocacy groupsmaintain and grow our business, we do, and we anticipate that we will continue to, depend on the continuation and expansion of relationships with third parties who provide us with services. These service provider partners include connected payroll partners, implementation partners, systems integrators, third party sales channel partners, the operators of data centers, and the technologyproviders who execute wire transfers and other industries are considering various new, additional, or different self-regulatory standards that may place additional burdens on us. If the processing of PII were to be curtailed in this manner, our solutions would be less effective, which may reduce demand for our applications, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We rely on third party service providers for many aspects of our business, including, but not limited to, the operation of data centers; the execution of Automated Clearing House, or ACH, and wire transfersmoney movement services to support our customer payroll and tax services; the monitoring of applicable laws;services. Our agreements with these third party service providers are typically non-exclusive and the printing and delivery of checks.do not prohibit them from working with our competitors. If any third partythird-party service providers on which we rely to provide us with services experience a disruption, go out of business, are acquired by our competitors, experience a decline in quality, or terminate their relationship with us, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation.

We rely onIn addition, we license software from third party service providersparties for many integral aspects ofuse in or with both our business. A failure onapplications and our internal operations, and the part of any of our third party service providersinability to fulfill their contracts with usmaintain these licenses could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation. We depend on our third parties for many services, including, but not limited to:

Upkeep of data centers

We host Dayforce and Powerpay applications and serve all of our customers from data centers operated by third party providers, primarily NaviSite, in Boston, Massachusetts; Redhill, England; Santa Clara, California; Toronto, Canada; Vancouver, Canada; and Woking, England. We also host Dayforce Australia in Microsoft Azure in Melbourne, Australia and Sydney, Australia. While we control and have access to our servers and all of the components of our network that are located in our external data centers, we do not control the operation of these facilities. The owners of our data center facilities have no obligation to renew their agreements with us on commercially reasonable terms,increased costs, or at all. These parties may also seek to cap their maximum contractual liability resulting in us being financially responsible for losses caused by their actions or omissions. Additionally, we host our internal systems through data centers that we operate and lease or own in Atlanta, Georgia; Fountain Valley, California; Louisville, Kentucky; St. Petersburg, Florida; and Winnipeg, Canada. If we are unable to renew our agreements with our third party providers or to renew our leases on commercially reasonable terms, or if one of our data center operators is acquired, we may be required to transfer our servers and other infrastructure to new data center facilities, and we may incur significant costs and possiblereduced service interruption in connection with any such transfer. Both our third party data centers and data centers that we lease and operate are subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism, and other misconduct. Any such acts could result in a breach of the security of our or our customers’ data.


Problems faced by our third party data center locations, with the telecommunications network providers with whom we or they contract, or with the systems by which our telecommunications providers allocate capacity among their customers, including us, could adversely affect the experience of our customers. Our third party data centers operators could decide to close their facilities without adequate notice. In addition, any financial difficulties, such as bankruptcy, faced by our third party data centers operators or any of the service providers with whom we or they contract may have negative effects on our business, the nature and extent of which are difficult to predict. Additionally, if our data centers are unable to keep up with our growing needs for capacity, this could adversely affect the growth of our business. Any changes in third party service levels, at our data centers or any security breaches, errors, defects, disruptions, or other performance problems with our applications could adversely affect our reputation, damage our customers’ stored files, result in lengthy interruptions in our services, or otherwise result in damage or losses to our customers for which they may seek compensation from us. Interruptions in our services might reduce our revenues, cause us to issue refunds to customers for prepaid and unused subscription services, subject us to potential liability, or adversely affect our renewal rates.

Processing of electronic funds transfers

We currently have agreements with three banks in the United States, two banks in Canada, and one financial payments company in the United Kingdom to execute electronic funds transfers to support our customer payroll and tax services in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. If one or more of these parties fails to process electronic funds transfers on a timely basis, or at all, then our relationship with our customers could be harmed and we could be subject to claims by a customer with respect to the failed transfers, with little or no recourse to the banks. In addition, these parties have no obligation to renew their agreements with us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and transferring to alternative providers could prove time-consuming and costly. If these parties terminate their relationships with us, restrict or fail to increase the dollar amounts of funds that they will process on behalf of our customers, their doing so may impede our ability to process funds and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Check printing and delivery

In Canada, we rely on a third party vendor to print payroll checks, and in Canada and the United States we rely on third party couriers, such as Federal Express and Purolator, to ship printed reports, year-end slips, and pay checks to our customers. Relying on third party check printers and couriers puts us at risk from disruptions in their operations, such as employee strikes, inclement weather, and their ability to perform tasks on our behalf. If these vendors fail to perform their tasks, we could incur liability or suffer damages to our reputation, or both. If we are forced to use other third party couriers, transferring to these competitor couriers could prove time-consuming, our costs could increase and we may not be able to meet shipment deadlines. Moreover, we may not be able to obtain terms as favorable as those we currently use, which could further increase our costs.

Monitoring of changes to applicable laws

We and our third party providers must monitor for any changes or updates in laws that are applicable to the solutions that we or our third party providers provide to our customers. In addition, we are reliant on our third party providers to modify the solutions that they provide to our customers to enable our clients to comply with changes to such laws and regulations. If our third party providers fail to reflect changes or updates in applicable laws in the solutions that they provide to our customers, we could be subject to negative customer experiences, harm to our reputation, loss of customers, claims for any fines, penalties or other damages suffered by our customers, and other financial harm.

A failure on the part of any of our third party service providers could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

If we are unable to develop or to sell our existing Cloud solutions into new markets or to further penetrate existing markets, our revenue may not grow as expected.

Our ability to increase revenue will depend, in large part, on our ability to sell our existing Cloud solutions into new markets around the world, to further penetrate our existing markets, and to increase sales from existing customers who do not utilize the full Dayforce suite. The success of any enhancement or new solution or service depends on several factors, including the timely completion, introduction and market acceptance of enhanced or new solutions, the ability to maintain and to develop relationships with third parties, and the ability to attract, to retain and to effectively train sales and marketing personnel. Any new solutions we develop or acquire may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner and may not achieve the market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenue. Any new markets in which we attempt to sell our


platform and solutions, including new countries or regions, may not be receptive. Additionally, any expansion into new markets will require commensurate ongoing expansion of our monitoring of local laws and regulations, which increases our costs as well as the risk of the product not incorporating in a timely fashion or at all the necessary changes to enable a customer to be compliant with such laws. Our ability to further penetrate our existing markets depends on the quality of our platform and solutions, and our ability to design our Cloud solutions to meet consumer demand; and our ability to increase sales from existing customers depends on our customers’ satisfaction with our product and need for additional solutions. If we are unable to sell our Cloud solutions into new markets or to further penetrate existing markets, or to increase sales from existing customers, our revenue may not grow as expected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Because a growing part To the extent that our applications depend upon the successful operation of third party software in conjunction with our software, any undetected errors or defects in this third party software could prevent the deployment or impair the functionality of our business consistsapplications, delay new application introductions, and result in a failure of sales ofour applications, to manage complex operating environments for our customers, we may experience longer sales cycles and longer deployments. Some customers demand more configuration and integration services, and require increased compliance and initial support costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations in a given period.operations.

A growing portion of our customer base requires applications that manage complex operating environments. Our ability to increase revenues and to maintain profitability depends, in large part, on widespread acceptance of our applications by businesses and other organizations. As we target our sales efforts at these customers, we face greater costs, longer sales cycles, and less predictability in completing some of our sales. For some of our customers, the customer’s decision to use our applications may be an enterprise-wide decision and, therefore, these types of sales require us to provide greater levels of education regarding the use and benefits of our applications. Our typical sales cycles for Dayforce range from three to twelve months, and we expect that this lengthy sales cycle may continue or increase as customers adopt our applications. Longer sales cycles could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations in a given period.

It typically takes approximately three to nine months to implement a new customer on Dayforce, depending on the number and type of applications, the complexity and scale of the customers’ business, the configuration requirements, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Although our contracts are generally non-cancellable by the customer, at any given time, a significant percentage of our customers may be still in the process of deploying our applications, particularly during periods of rapid growth. Some customers may opt for phased roll outs, which further lengthens the time for us to see profits from such contracts.

Some of our customers may demand more configuration and integration services, which increase our upfront investment in sales and deployment efforts. Additionally, customers may require increased compliance and initial support costs during the onboarding process. As a result of these factors, we must devote a significant amount of sales support and professional services resources to individual customers, increasing the cost and time required to complete sales. The increased costs associated with completing sales and the implementation process for these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

If our customers are not satisfied with the implementation and professional services provided by us or our partners, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business depends on our ability to implement our solutions on a timely, accurate, and cost-efficient basis and to provide professional services demanded by our customers. Implementation and other professional services may be performed by our own staff, by a third party, or by a combination of the two. Although we perform the majority of our implementations and other professional services with our staff, in some instances we work with third parties to increase the breadth of capability and depth of capacity for delivery of certain services to our customers. In 2017 and 2018, we used third parties to assist us in approximately 20% of our implementation services. If a customer is not satisfied with the quality of work performed by us or a third party or with the implementation or type of professional services or applications delivered, or there are inaccuracies or errors in the work delivered by the third party, then we could incur additional costs to address the situation, the profitability of that work might be impaired, and the customer’s dissatisfaction with such services could damage our ability to expand the number of applications subscribed to by that customer or we could be liable for loss or damage suffered by the customer as a result of such third party’s actions or omissions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. If a new customer is dissatisfied with professional service, either performed by us or a third party, the customer could refuse to go-live, which could result in a delay in our collection of revenue or could result in a customer seeking repayment of its implementation fees or suing us for damages, or could force us to enforce the termination provisions in our customer contracts in order to collect revenue. In addition, negative publicity related to our customer relationships, regardless of its accuracy, may affect our ability to compete for new business with current and prospective customers, which could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


The loss of a significant portion of our customers, or a failure to renew our subscription agreements with a significant portion of our customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The loss of a significant portion of our customers, or a failure of some of them to renew their contracts with us, could have a significant impact on our revenues, reputation, and our ability to obtain new customers. Our agreements with our Dayforce customers are typically structured as having an initial fixed term of between three and five years, with evergreen renewal thereafter; consequently, our customers may choose to terminate their agreements with us at any time after the expiration of the initial term by providing us with the amount of written notice stipulated in the agreement. Moreover, acquisitions of our customers could lead to cancellation of our contracts with them or by the acquiring companies, thereby reducing the number of our existing and potential customers. Acquisitions of our partners involved in referring or reselling our solutions could also result in a reduction in the number of our current and potential customers, as our partners may no longer facilitate the adoption of our applications. A failure to retain a significant portion of our customers, or a failure to renew our subscription agreements with a significant portion of customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our customers may fail to pay us in accordance with the terms of their agreements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our agreements with our Dayforce customers are typically structured as having an initial fixed term of between three and five years, with evergreen renewal thereafter. If customers fail to pay us under the terms of our agreements with them, we may be unable to collect amounts due and may be required to incur additional costs enforcing the terms of our contracts, including litigation. The risk of such negative effects increases with the term length of our customer arrangements. Furthermore, some of our customers may seek bankruptcy protection or other similar relief and fail to pay amounts due to us, or to pay those amounts more slowly. If our customers fail to pay us in accordance with the terms of their agreements, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We often provide service level commitments under our customer contracts. If we fail to meet these contractual commitments, we could be considered to have breached our contractual obligations, be obligated to provide credits, or refund prepaid amounts related to unused subscription services or face contract terminations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our customer agreements typically provide service level commitments which are measured on a monthly or other periodic basis. If we are unable to meet the stated service level commitments or suffer extended periods of unavailability for our applications, we may be contractually obligated to provide these customers with service credits or refunds for prepaid amounts related to unused subscription services, or we could face contract claims for damages or terminations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, our revenues could be significantly affected if we suffer unscheduled downtime that exceeds the allowed downtimes under our agreements with our customers. Any extended service outages could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Any failure to offer high-quality technical support services may adversely affect our relationships with our customers and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Once our applications are deployed, our customers depend on our support organization and the support capabilities of our partners to resolve technical issues relating to our applications, as well as our partner’s applications. We or our partners may be unable to respond quickly enough to accommodate short-term increases in customer demand for support services.services, and we may be limited in our ability to resolve the technical issues our customers have with our technology, or our partner’s technology. We or our partners also may be unable to modify the format of our or our partners’ support services to compete with changes in support services provided by our competitors. Increased customer demand for these services, without corresponding revenues, could increase costs and have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Ultimately, a client could elect to terminate their agreement due to dissatisfaction with support, resulting in lost recurring revenue. In addition, our sales process is highly dependent on our applications and business reputation and on positive recommendations from our existing customers. Any failure to maintain high-quality technical support, or a market perception that we do not maintain high-quality support, could adversely affect our reputation and our ability to sell our applications to existing and prospective customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Regulatory requirements placed onIf our softwarecustomers are not satisfied with the implementation and professional services could impose increased costs on us, delay or prevent our introduction of new products and services, and impair the function or value of our existing products and services.

Our products and services may become subject to increasing regulatory requirements, and as these requirements proliferate, we may be required to change or adapt our products and services to comply. Changing regulatory requirements might render our products and services obsolete or might block us from developing new products and services. This might in turn impose additional costs upon us to comply or to further develop our products and services. It might also make introduction of new products and services more costly or more time-consuming than we currently anticipate and could even prevent introductionprovided by us of new products or services or cause the continuation of our existing products or services to become more costly. Accordingly, such regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Customers depend on our products and services to enable them to comply with applicable laws, which requires us and our third party providers to constantly monitor applicable laws and to make applicable changes to our solutions. If our solutions have not been updated to enable the customer to comply with applicable laws or we fail to update our solutions on a timely basis,partners, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Customers relyOur business depends on the ability to implement our solutions to enable them to comply with payroll, HR, and other applicable laws for which the solutions are intended for use. Changes in tax, benefit, and other laws and regulations could require us to make significant modifications to our products or to delay or to cease sales of certain products, which could result in reduced revenues or revenue growth and our incurring substantial expenses and write-offs. There are thousands of jurisdictions and multiple laws in some or all of such jurisdictions, which may be relevant to the solutions that we or our third party providers provide to our customers. Therefore, we and our third party providers must monitor all applicable laws and as such laws expand, evolve, or are amended in any way, and when new regulations or laws are implemented, we may be required to modify our solutions to enable our customers to comply, which requires an investment of our time and resources. Although we believe that our Cloud platform provides us with flexibility to release updates in response to these changes, we cannot be certain that we will be able to make the necessary changes to our solutions and release updates on a timely, accurate, and cost-efficient basis orand to provide professional services at all. In addition, we are reliant onthe high level demanded by our customers. Implementation and other professional services may be performed by our own staff, by a third party, providersor by a combination of the two. If a customer is not satisfied with the quality of work performed, or there are inaccuracies or errors in the work delivered, then we could incur additional costs to modifyaddress the solutions that they providesituation, the customer’s dissatisfaction with such services could damage our ability to our customers as part of our solutions to comply with changes to such laws and regulations. Theexpand the number of laws and regulationsapplications subscribed to by that we are required to monitor will increase as we expand the geographic region in which the solutions are offered. When a law changes, we must then test our solutions to meet the requirements necessary to enable our customers to comply with the new law. If our solutions fail to enable a customer to comply with applicable laws,or we could be subject to negative customer experiences, harm to our reputationliable for loss or loss of customers, claims for any fines, penalties or other damagesdamage suffered by our customer, and other financial harm. Additionally, the costs associated with such monitoring implementation of changes are significant. If our solutions do not enable our customers to comply with applicable laws and regulations, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Additionally, if we fail to make any changes to our products as described herein, which are required as a result, of such changes to, or enactment of, any applicable laws in a timely fashion, we could be responsible for fines and penalties implemented by governmental and regulatory bodies. If we fail to provide contracted services, such as processing W-2 tax forms or remitting taxes in accordance with deadlines set by law, our customers could incur fines, penalties, interest, or other damages, which we could be responsible for paying. Our payment of fines, penalties, interest, or other damages as a result of our failure to provide compliance services prior to deadlines may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We operate and are subject to tax in multiple jurisdictions. Audits, investigations, and tax proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We are subject to income and non-income taxes in multiple jurisdictions. Income tax accounting often involves complex issues, and judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. We are regularly subject to tax audits in these jurisdictions. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits to determine the appropriateness of our tax reserves as well as our future tax liabilities. In addition, the application of withholding tax, value added tax, goods and services tax, sales tax, and other non-income taxes is not always clear and we may be subject to audits relating to such withholding or non-income taxes. We believe that our tax positions are reasonable and our tax reserves are adequate to cover any potential liability. However, tax authorities in these jurisdictions may challenge our position. If any of these tax authorities successfully challenge our positions, we may be liable for additional tax, penalties, and interest in excess of any reserves established, which may have a significant impact on our results and operations and future cash flow.


Sales to customers outside the United States or with international operations expose us to risks inherent in international sales.

Over 30% of our revenue for each of the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, was obtained from companies headquartered outside of the United States, primarily from Canada, which accounted for 30.1%, 30.3%, 30.2% of our revenue in such periods, respectively. Our Ceridian Canada Ltd. (“Ceridian Canada”) operations provide certain HCM solutions for our Canadian customers. We are continuing to expand our international Cloud solutions into other countries. As such, our international operations are subject to risks that could adversely affect those operations or our business as a whole, including:

costs of localizing products and services for foreign customers;

difficulties in managing and staffing international operations;

difficulties and increased expenses related to introducing corporate policies and controls in our international operations;

difficulties with or inability to engage global partners;

longer sales and payment cycles;

the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws;

compliance with applicable anti-bribery laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;

additional regulatory compliance requirements;

exposure to legal jurisdictions that may not recognize or interpret customer contracts appropriately;

potentially adverse tax consequences, including the complexities of foreign value added tax systems, the tax cost on the repatriation of earnings, and changes in tax rates;

restrictions on transfer of funds, laws and business practices favoring local competitors;

reduced or varied protection for intellectual property and other legal rights as compared to the United States;

practical difficulties in enforcing intellectual property and other rights outside of the United States;

exposure to local economic and political conditions; and

changes in currency exchange rates, and in particular, changes in the currency exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars.

In addition, we anticipate that customers and potential customers may increasingly require and demand that a single vendor provide HCM solutions and services for their employees in a number of countries. If we are unable to provide the required services on a multinational basis, there may be a negative impact on our new orders and customer retention, which would negatively impact revenue and earnings. Although we have a multinational strategy, additional investment and efforts may be necessary to implement such strategy. Some of our business partners also have international operations and are subject to the risks described above. Even if we are able to successfully manage the risks of international operations, our business may be adversely affected if our business partners are not able to successfully manage these risks.

If we fail to manage our technical operations infrastructure, our existing customers may experience service outages, and our new customers may experience delays in the deployment of our applications, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We have experienced significant growth in the number of users, transactions, and data that our operations infrastructure supports. We seek to maintain sufficient excess capacity in our operations infrastructure to meet the needs of all of our customers. We also seek to maintain excess capacity to facilitate the rapid provision of new customer activations and the expansion of existing customer activations. In addition, we need to properly manage our technological operations infrastructure in order to support version control, changes in hardware and software parameters, and the evolution of our applications. However, the provision of new hosting infrastructure requires significant lead time. We have experienced, and may in the future experience, website disruptions, outages and other performance problems. These problems may be caused by a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, viruses, security attacks, fraud, increased resource consumption from expansion or modification to our Dayforce code, spikes in customer usage, and denial of service issues. In some instances, we may not be able to identify the cause or causes of these performance problems within an acceptable period of time. If we do not accurately predict our infrastructure requirements, our existing customers may


experience service outages that may subject them to financial penalties, causing us to incur financial liabilities and customer losses, and our operations infrastructure may fail to keep pace with increased sales, causing new customers to experience delays as we seek to obtain additional capacity, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Aging software infrastructure may lead to increased costs and disruptions in operations that could negatively impact our financial results.

We have risks associated with aging software infrastructure assets. The age of certain of our assets may result in a need for replacement, or higher level of maintenance costs. A higher level of expenses associated with our aging software infrastructure may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our growth depends in part on the success of our strategic relationships with third parties.

In order to grow our business, we anticipate that we will continue to depend on the continuation and expansion of relationships with third parties, such as implementation partners, third party sales channel partners, some of whom have exclusive relationships with us, and technology and content providers. Identifying partners and negotiating and documenting relationships with them requires significant time and resources. In addition, the third parties we partner with may not perform as expected under our agreements, and we may have disagreements or disputes with such third parties, which could negatively affect our brand and reputation.

Additionally, we rely on the expansion of our relationships with our third party partners as we grow our Cloud solutions. Our agreements with third parties are typically non-exclusive and do not prohibit them from working with our competitors. Our competitors may be effective in providing incentives to these same third parties to favor their products or services. In addition, acquisitions of our partners by our competitors could result in a reduction in the number of our current and potential customers, as our partners may no longer facilitate the adoption of our applications by potential customers after an acquisition by any of our competitors.

If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining our relationships with third parties, our ability to compete in the marketplace or to grow our revenues could be impaired, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Even if we are successful, we cannot assure you that these relationships will result in increased customer usage of our applications or increased revenues.

If our current or future applications fail to perform properly, our reputation could be adversely affected, our market share could decline, and we could be subject to liability claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our applications are inherently complex and may contain material defects or errors. Any defects in functionality or that cause interruptions in the availability of our applications could result in:

loss or delayed market acceptance and sales;

breach of warranty or other contractual claims for damages incurred by customers;

errors in application output and resulting fines or penalties;

sales credits or refunds for prepaid amounts related to unused subscription services;

loss of customers;

diversion of development and customer service resources; and

injury to our reputation;

any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition,If a new customer is dissatisfied with implementation, the costs incurred in correcting any material defects or errors might be substantial.


Because of the large amount of data that we collect and manage, it is possible that hardware failures or errors in our systemscustomer could refuse to go-live, which could result in data lossa delay in our collection of revenue or corruptioncould result in a customer seeking repayment of its implementation fees or causesuing us for damages, or could force us to enforce the information that wetermination provisions in our customer contracts in order to collect to be incomplete or contain inaccuracies that our customers regard as significant. Furthermore, the availability or performancerevenue. In addition,

15 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of our applications could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including customers’ inability to access the Internet, the failure of our network or software systems, security breaches, or variability in user traffic for our services. We may be required to issue credits or refunds for prepaid amountsContents

negative publicity related to unused services or otherwise be liableour customer relationships, regardless of its accuracy, may affect our ability to ourcompete for new business with current and prospective customers, for damages they may incur resulting from certain of these events. Because of the nature of our business, our reputation could be harmed as a result of factors beyond our control. For example, because our customers access our applications through their Internet service providers, if a service provider fails to provide sufficient capacity to support our applications or otherwise experiences service outages, such failure could interrupt our customers’ access to or experience with our applications, which could adversely affect our reputation or our customers’ perception of our applications’ reliability or otherwisealso have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our insurance intended to cover liability claims may be inadequate or may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, our policy may not cover all claims made against us, and defending a suit, regardless of its merit, could be costly and divert management’s attention.

We depend on our senior management team, and the loss of one or more key employees or an inability to attract and to retain highly skilled employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our success depends largely upon the continued services of our keysenior management team. Our executive officers. We also rely on our leadership team in the areas of research and development, marketing, sales, services, and general and administrative functions, and on mission-critical individual contributors in all such areas. From time to time, there may be changes in our executiveofficers, senior management team resulting from the hiring or departure of executives, which could disrupt our business. We do not have employment agreements with our executive officers or other key personnel that require themhave limited or no notice period applicable to continue to work for us for any specified period, and, therefore,their employment. Therefore, they could terminate their employment with us at any time. Additionally, we do not maintain key manemployee insurance on any of our executive officers, senior management or key employees. The loss of one or more of our executive officers, senior management or key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

To execute our growth plan, we must attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Competition for personneltalent is intense, and has become more intense following the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 ("COVID-19") pandemic, including without limitation for individuals with high levels of experience in designing and developing software and Internet-related services and senior sales executives. We have, from time to time, experienced, and we expect to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining employees with appropriate qualifications. Many of the companies with which we compete for experienced personnel have greater resources than we have.

If we hire employees from competitorsour vendors or other companies, their former employers may attempt to assert that these employees have or that we have breached their legal obligations, resulting in a diversionaffiliates initiate payroll-related transactions on behalf of our timecustomers and resources. In addition, job candidates and existing employees often considerdo not receive funds from the value ofcustomer sufficient to cover the stock awards they receive in connection withamounts paid on their employment. If the perceived value of our stock awards declines, itbehalf, we may adversely affect our ability to recruit and to retain highly skilled employees. If we fail to attract new personnel or fail to retain and to motivate our current personnel, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We havesuffer significant operations in the Republic of Mauritius. Changes in the laws and regulations in Mauritius or our non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our Mauritius operations, which employ 685 employees as of December 31, 2018, are subject to the laws and regulations of the Republic of Mauritius. The continuance of these operations depends upon compliance with applicable Mauritius environmental, health, safety, labor, social security, pension, and other laws and regulations. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations could result in fines, penalties, or lawsuits. In addition, there is no assurance that we will be able to comply fully with applicable laws and regulations should there be any amendment to the existing regulatory regime or implementation of any new laws and regulations. Changes in the laws and regulations in Mauritius or our non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Additionally, Mauritius lacks the infrastructure of countries in which we do business, such as the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Any disruption to the electrical grid or catastrophic event in Mauritius could result in a longer response time in our ability to address the issue due to the remote geographic location of Mauritius,losses which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Furthermore, our business

Our payroll and operations in Mauritius entailtax processing services involve the procurementmovement of licenses and permitssignificant funds from the account of a customer to its employees and to relevant taxing authorities. DifficultiesTypically, we rely upon third party vendors to initiate payments on behalf of our customers. In certain jurisdictions, where permitted, our affiliates may also initiate payments on behalf of our customers. Under certain circumstances, funds may not be received to cover the transactions that our affiliates and third party vendors have initiated on our customers’ behalf. Additionally, there is a risk that an erroneous payment instruction may trigger inaccurate payments. There is, therefore, a risk that the customer’s funds will be insufficient to cover the amounts already paid on its behalf. Should customers default on their payment obligations in the future, should our affiliates or failure in obtaining thevendors make erroneous payments on behalf of a customer, should erroneous or defaulted payment recovery be unsuccessful, or should our affiliates or vendors suffer losses from similar issues, we may be required permits, licenses, and certificates could result into advance substantial amounts of funds to cover such obligations, or to make our inabilitypartners whole for any losses they suffer. In such an event, we may be required to continue our business in Mauritius in a manner consistent with past practice,seek additional sources of short-term liquidity, which may not be available on reasonable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Further, should a customer on whose behalf our affiliate or vendor has initiated a transaction subsequently have financial difficulty or refuse to pay, collection of any funds advanced on its behalf may be difficult and we may suffer losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.


For our Dayforce Wallet service, we advance earned net wages and associated tax amounts on behalf of customers in connection with the “on demand pay” payroll feature of the service in order to provide their employees access to earned wages in advance of their standard payroll cycles. A customer may fail to satisfy its obligation to repay us for those advanced monies which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In the case of our “on demand pay” service (a service that is offered as part of the Dayforce Wallet), credit is provided to our customers and funds are advanced on the customers’ behalf in order to fund the customers’ employees’ interim earned net wage payroll demands (including associated source and other deductions) with the requirement that the customers will repay the advance on the date of their next ordinary payroll run. These advances may or may not have priority over other creditors of our customers, and our security interest and/or other credit protection measures, if implemented, may be inadequate to make us whole. There is, therefore, a risk that our customers do not pay back the amounts we have already paid on their behalf, and in that event, we may possess limited legal recourse to recoup those funds from our customers. In the event of a customer’s failure to repay us, we may be required to seek additional sources of short-term liquidity, which may not be available on reasonable terms, or suffer credit losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

16 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Customer funds and wage funds of their employees that our trustees and third-party financial institution partners hold are subject to market, interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks. The loss of these funds could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our trustees (in the case of customer funds held in our U.S. Ceridian Clients’ Funds Trust and our Ceridian Canada Payroll Trust) and our third party financial institution partners (in the case of employee wage funds held on their behalf as part of the U.S. Dayforce Wallet program and certain of our non-U.S. operations) may invest funds in one or more high-quality bank deposits, money market mutual funds, commercial paper, collateralized short-term investments, government securities, as well as highly rated asset-backed, mortgage-backed, municipal, corporate, and bank securities. These assets are subject to varying degrees of general market, interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks. These risks may be exacerbated, individually or in unison, during periods of unusual financial market volatility. We are required to fund the payroll and wage funds of our customers and their employees regardless of any loss realized on those investments affecting the principal funds held. In the event of a global financial crisis, such as that experienced in 2008, we could be faced with a severe constriction of the availability of liquidity, which could impact our ability to fund payrolls. Any loss of principal, or inability to access customer funds could have an adverse impact on our cash position and results of operations and could require us to obtain additional sources of liquidity, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may acquire other companies or technologies, which could divert our management’s attention, result in additional indebtedness or dilution to our stockholders, and otherwise disrupt our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We have, and we may in the future seek to acquire or to invest in businesses, applications or technologies that we believe could complement or expand our applications, enhance our technical capabilities, or otherwise offer growth opportunities. The pursuit of potential acquisitions may divert the attention of management and cause us to incur various expenses in identifying, investigating, and pursuing suitable acquisitions, whether or not they are consummated.

In addition, we have limited experience in acquiring other businesses. If we acquire additional businesses, we may incur significant costs to integrate such businesses. Further, we may not be able to integrate the acquired personnel, operations, and technologies successfully or profitably, or to effectively manage the combined business following the acquisition. We also may not achieve the anticipated benefits from the acquired business due to a number of factors, including the inability to integrate or to benefit from acquired technologies or services in a profitable manner, unanticipated costs or liabilities associated with the acquisition, difficulties and additional expenses associated with supporting legacy products and hosting infrastructure of the acquired business, difficulty converting the customers of the acquired business onto our applications and contract terms, and adverse effects to our existing business relationships with business partners and customer as a result of the acquisition.

If an acquired business fails to meet our expectations, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Acquisitions could also result inIn order to fund acquisitions, we may issue dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence ofincur additional debt, which couldresulting in an increase our interest payments.

In addition, aA significant portion of the purchase price of companies we acquire may be allocated to acquired goodwill and other intangible assets, which must be assessed for impairment at least annually. In the event that the book value of goodwill or other intangible assets is impaired, any such impairment would be charged to earnings in the period of impairment. In the future, if our acquisitions do not yield expected returns, we may be required to record charges based on this impairment assessment, process, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

AdverseFailure to comply with anti-corruption laws and regulations, economic conditionsand trade sanctions, anti-money laundering laws and regulations, and similar laws could have a materially adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations or financial condition, or have other adverse consequences.

Regulators worldwide are exercising heightened scrutiny with respect to anti-corruption, economic and trade sanctions, and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Such heightened scrutiny has resulted in more aggressive investigations and enforcement of such laws and more burdensome regulations, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business. We are growing our business throughout the world, including in numerous developing economies where companies and government officials are more likely to engage in business practices that are prohibited by domestic and foreign laws and regulations, including the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, the anti-corruption provisions of the Australian criminal code, and the U.K. Bribery Act. Such laws generally prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign government officials and leaders of political parties, and in some cases, to other persons, for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We are also subject to economic and trade sanctions programs, including those administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, which prohibit or restrict transactions or dealings with specified countries, their governments and, in certain circumstances, their nationals, and with individuals and entities that are specially designated, including narcotics traffickers and terrorists or terrorist organizations, among others. In addition, some of our businesses and entities in the U.S. and a number of other countries in which we operate are and will continue to be subject to anti-money laundering laws and regulations. These laws require us to develop and implement risk-based anti-money laundering programs, report large cash transactions and suspicious activity, and maintain transaction records.

17 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

We have implemented policies and procedures to monitor and address compliance with applicable anti-corruption, economic and trade sanctions and anti-money laundering laws and regulations, and we are continuously in the process of reviewing, upgrading and enhancing certain of our policies and procedures. However, there can be no assurance that our employees, consultants or agents will not take actions in violation of our policies for which we may be ultimately responsible, or that our policies and procedures will be adequate or will be determined to be adequate by regulators. Any violations of applicable anti-corruption, economic and trade sanctions or anti-money laundering laws or regulations could limit certain of our business activities until they are satisfactorily remediated and could result in civil and criminal penalties, including fines, which could damage our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our results of operation or financial condition. Further, banks are increasingly viewing money services businesses, as a class, to be higher risk customers for money laundering. As a result, our banking partners that assist in processing our money movement transactions may limit the scope of services they provide to us or may impose additional material requirements on us. These regulatory restrictions on banks and changes to banks’ internal risk-based policies and procedures may result in a decrease in the number of banks that may do business with us, may require us to materially change the manner in which we conduct some aspects of our business, may decrease our revenues and earnings and could have a material adverse effect on our results or financial condition.

We may not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business dependsAs of December 31, 2021, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards due to prior period losses, which, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2034 and 2022 for federal and state purposes, respectively. These net operating loss carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on the overall demand for HCM solutionsour financial condition and on the economic healthresults of our current and prospective customers. Past financial recessions have resulted in a significant weakeningoperations.

In addition, under Section 382 of the economyInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), our ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards or other tax attributes in North America and globally, the reduction in employment levels, the reduction in prevailing interest rates, moreany taxable year may be limited availability of credit, a reduction in business confidence and activity, and other difficulties that may affectif we experience an “ownership change.” A Section 382 “ownership change” generally occurs if one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders who own at least 5% of our stock increase their ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage within a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. Future issuances of our stock could cause an “ownership change.” It is possible that an ownership change could have a material effect on our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the industries to which we sell our applications. In addition, there has been pressure to reduce government spending in the United States, and any tax increases and spending cuts at the federal level might reduce demand for our applications from organizations that receive funding from the U.S. government and could negatively affect the U.S. economy, which could further reduce demand for our applications. Any of these eventsSarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, there can

As a public company, we are required to design and maintain proper and effective internal controls over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal controls. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and provide a management report on the internal controls over financial reporting, which must be no assurance that spending levels for HCM solutions will increase following any recovery.

Catastrophic eventsattested to by our independent registered public accounting firm. We have previously identified and reported material weaknesses, and we may disruptidentify additional material weaknesses in internal controls in future periods. If we were to have another material weakness in our business.

Our data centers are located in Atlanta, Georgia; Fountain Valley, California; Louisville, Kentucky; St. Petersburg, Florida; and Winnipeg, Canada. Additionally, our data centers hosted by third partiesinternal controls over financial reporting, we may not detect errors on a timely basis and our corporate offices are locatedfinancial statements may be materially misstated. There could also be a negative reaction in Boston, Massachusetts; Melbourne, Australia; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Redhill, England; Santa Clara, California; Sydney, Australia; Toronto, Canada; Vancouver, Canada; and Woking, England. Any locationthe financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in any part of the world is susceptible to natural disasters or other risks beyond our control and its third party contractors that could impact operations. For example, the west coast of the United States contains active earthquake zones, the Midwest is subject to periodic tornadoes,us and the east coast is subject to seasonal hurricanes and snowstorms. Additionally, we employ a substantial number of employees located in the Republic of Mauritius, which is subject to seasonal hurricanes, and the geographic remoteness of the location may create additional delays in recovery from any catastrophic event. Additionally, we rely on our network and third party infrastructure and enterprise applications, internal technology systems, and our website for our development, marketing, operational support, hosted services and sales activities. In the event of a major earthquake, tornado, hurricane, or catastrophic event, such as fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, cyber-attack, war, or terrorist attack in anyreliability of our domestic or international locations, we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure system interruptions, reputational harm, delays in our application development, lengthy interruptions in our services, breaches of data security and loss of critical data, all ofconsolidated financial statements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Litigation and regulatory investigations aimed at us or resulting from actions of our predecessor may result in significant financial losses and harm to our reputation.

We face risk of litigation, regulatory investigations, and similar actions in the ordinary course of our business, including the risk of lawsuits and other legal actions relating to breaches of contractual obligations, tortious claims, employment and labor law matters, securities law claims, or claims related to erroneous transactions or breach of data privacy laws from customers, stockholders, employees or other third parties which could result in fines, penalties, interest, or other damages. Litigation might result in substantial costs and may divert management’s attention and resources, which might materially harm our business, overall financial condition, and operating results. We may also be subject to various regulatory inquiries, such as information requests, subpoenas and book and records examinations, from

18 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

regulators and other authorities in the geographic markets in which we operate. A substantial liability arising from a lawsuit judgment or settlement or a significant regulatory action against us or a disruption in our business arising from adverse adjudications in proceedings against our directors, officers, or employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results or operations. Insurance might not cover such claims, might not provide sufficient payments to cover all the costs to resolve one or more such claims and might not continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. A claim brought against us that is uninsured or underinsured could result in unanticipated costs, thereby harming our operating results and leading analysts or potential investors to lower their expectations of our performance, which could reduce the trading price of our stock or potentially result in a lawsuit related to the reduced trading price of our stock.

Additionally, we are subject to claims and investigations as a result of our predecessor, Control Data Corporation (“CDC”), Ceridian Corporation, and other former entities for whom we are successor-in-interest with respect to assumed liabilities. For example, in September 1989, CDC became party to an environmental matters agreement with Seagate Technology plc (“Seagate”) related to groundwater contamination on a parcel of real estate in Omaha, Nebraska sold by CDC to Seagate. In February 1988, CDC entered into an arrangement with Northern Engraving Corporation and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in relation to groundwater contamination at a site in Spring Grove, Minnesota. Although we are fully reserved for these groundwater contamination liabilities, we cannot be certain if additional claims, investigations or liabilities related to such predecessor companies will surface.

Any failure to protect our intellectual property rights could impair our ability to protect our proprietary technology and our brand.

Our success and ability to compete depend in part upon our intellectual property. We primarily rely on copyright, trade secret, and trademark laws; trade secret protection; and confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, customers, partners and others to protect our intellectual property rights. However, the steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights may be ineffective or inadequate.

In order to protect our intellectual property rights, we mayhave and will likely be required to continue to spend significant resources to monitor and to protect these rights. Litigation brought to protect and to enforce our intellectual property rights could be costly, time-consuming, and distracting to management, with no guarantee of success, and could result in the impairment or loss of portions of our intellectual property. Furthermore, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims, and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property rights. Our failure to secure, to protect, and to enforce our intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Litigation and regulatory investigations aimed at us or resulting from actions of our predecessor may result in significant financial losses and harm to our reputation.

We face risk of litigation, regulatory investigations, and similar actions in the ordinary course of our business, including the risk of lawsuits and other legal actions relating to breaches of contractual obligations or tortious claims from customers or other third parties, fines, penalties, interest, or other damages as a result of erroneous transactions, breach of data privacy laws, or lawsuits and legal actions related to our predecessors. Any such action may include claims for substantial or unspecified compensatory damages, as well as civil, regulatory, or criminal proceedings against our directors, officers, or employees; and the probability and amount of liability, if any, may remain unknown for significant periods of time. We may be also subject to various regulatory inquiries, such as information requests, and book and records examinations, from regulators and other authorities in the geographical markets in which we operate. A substantial liability arising from a lawsuit judgment or settlement or a significant regulatory action against us or a disruption in our business arising from adverse adjudications in proceedings against our directors, officers, or employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results or operations.

Additionally, we are subject to claims and investigations as a result of our predecessor, Control Data Corporation (“CDC”), Ceridian Corporation, and other former entities for whom we are successor-in-interest with respect to assumed liabilities. For example, in September 1989, CDC became party to an environmental matters agreement with Seagate Technology plc (“Seagate”) related to groundwater contamination on a parcel of real estate in Omaha, Nebraska sold by CDC to Seagate. In February 1988, CDC entered into an arrangement with Northern Engraving Corporation and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in relation to groundwater contamination at a site in Spring Grove, Minnesota. In August 2017, we received notice of a mesothelioma claim related to CDC. Although we are fully reserved for the groundwater contamination liabilities, we cannot at this time accurately assess the merits of these claims, and we cannot be certain if additional liabilities related to such predecessor companies will surface. Moreover, even if we ultimately prevail in or settle any litigation, regulatory action, or investigation, we could suffer significant harm to our reputation, which could materially affect our ability to attract new customers, to retain current customers, and to recruit and to retain employees, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be sued by third parties for alleged infringement of their proprietary rights.rights which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

There is considerable patent and other intellectual property development activity in our industry. Our success depends uponThird parties, including our not infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others. Our competitors, as well as a number of other entities and individuals, including parties commonly referred to as “patent trolls,” may own or claim to own intellectual property relating to our industry. From time to time, third partiesservice offerings and may claim that we are infringing upon their intellectual property rights, and werights. We may be found to be infringing upon such rights. In the future, others may claim that our applications and underlying technology infringe or violaterights, even if we are unaware of their intellectual property rights. However, we may be unaware of the intellectual property rights that others may claim cover some or all of our technology or services. Any claims or litigation could cause us to incur significant expenses and, if successfully asserted against us or if we decide to settle, could require that we pay substantial damages or ongoing royalty payments, obtain licenses, modify applications, prevent us from offering our services, or require that we comply with other unfavorable terms. We contractually agree to indemnify our customers with respect to claims of intellectual property infringement relating to our products, and may also be obligated to indemnify our customers, vendors or business partners or to pay substantial settlement costs, including royalty payments, in connection with any such claim or litigation, and to obtain licenses, to modify applications, or to refund fees, which could be costly.litigation. Even if we were to prevail in such a dispute, any litigation regarding our intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and divert the attentiontime consuming.

The use of our management and key personnel from our business operations. Any such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Some of our applications utilize open source software in our applications may expose us to additional risks and any failure to comply with the terms of one or more of these open source licenses could have a material adverse effect onharm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.intellectual property rights.

Some of our applications include software covered by open source licenses, which may include, by waylicenses. From time to time, there have been claims challenging the ownership of example, GNU General Public License and the Apache License.open source software against companies that incorporate such software into their products or applications. The terms of various open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to market our applications. By the terms of certain open source licenses, we could be required to release the source code of our proprietary software and to make our proprietary software available under open source licenses if we combine our proprietary software with open source software in a certain manner. In the event that portions of our proprietary software are determined to be subject to an open source license, we could be required to publicly release the affected

19 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

portions of our source code, to re-engineer all or a portion of our technologies, or otherwise to be limited in the licensing of our technologies, each of which could reduce or eliminate the value of our technologies and services. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of the software. Many of the risks associated with usage of open source software cannot be eliminated and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We employ third party software for use inThe implementation of new accounting systems or with both our applications and our internal operations, and the inability to maintain these licenses or errors in the software we license could result in increased costs, or reduced service levels, which could have a material adverse effect oninterfere with our business financial condition, and resultsoperations.

The implementation of operations.

Our applications, including Dayforce, incorporate certain third party software obtained under licenses from other companies. Additionally, we are reliant on third party software licenses for our internal operational applications. We anticipate that we will continue to rely on such third party softwarenew systems and development tools from third parties in the future. Although we believe that there are commercially reasonable alternatives to the third party software we currently license, this may not always be the case, or itenhancements may be difficultdisruptive to our business and can be time-consuming and divert management’s attention. Any disruptions relating to our systems or costly to replace, and our failure to migrate off end of life software may significantly impact our customer’s ability to operate. In addition, integration of the software used in our applications and inany problems with implementation, particularly any disruptions impacting our operations with new third party software may require significant work and require substantial investment of our time and resources. Also, our use of additional or alternative third party software would require us to enter into license agreements with third parties.

Additionally, if the quality of our third party software declines, the overall quality of our products may be negatively impacted. To the extent that our applications depend upon the successful operation of third party software in conjunction with our software, any undetected errors or defects in this third party software could prevent the deployment or impair the functionality of our applications, delay new application introductions, and result in a failure of our applications, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Changes in laws and regulations related to the Internet or changes in the Internet infrastructure itself may diminish the demand for our applications, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The future success of our business depends upon the continued use of the Internet as a primary medium for commerce, communication, and business applications. Federal, state or foreign government bodies or agencies have in the past adopted, and may in the future adopt, laws or regulations affecting the use of the Internet as a commercial medium. Changes in these laws or regulations could require us to modify our applications in order to comply with these changes. In addition, government agencies or private organizations may begin to impose taxes, fees, or other charges for accessing the Internet or commerce conducted via the Internet. These laws or charges could limit the growth of Internet-related commerce or communications generally, resulting in reductions in the demand for Internet-based applications such as ours, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In addition, the use of the Internet as a business tool could be adversely affected due to delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols to handle increased demands of Internet activity, security, reliability, cost, ease of use, accessibility, and quality of service. The performance of the Internet and its acceptance as a business tool has been adversely affected by “viruses,” “worms,” and similar malicious programs, and the Internet has experienced a variety of outages and other delays as a result of damage to portions of its infrastructure. If the use of the Internet is adversely affected by these issues, demand for our applications could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


We may pay employees and taxing authorities amounts due for a payroll period before a customer’s electronic funds transfers are settled with finality to our trust account, or make erroneous payments to employees, taxing authorities, or other entities. If customer payments are rejected by banking institutions or otherwise fail to clear into our trust accounts, or erroneous payments are not quickly resolved, we may require additional sources of short-term liquidity which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our payroll processing business involves the movement of significant funds from the account of a customer to employees and relevant taxing authorities. We debit a customer’s account prior to any disbursement on its behalf. Under certain circumstances, funds previously credited to our trust account could be reversed after our payment of amounts due to employees and taxing and other regulatory authorities. There is, therefore, a risk that the employer’s funds will be insufficient to cover the amounts we have already paid on its behalf. While such funding shortage or erroneous payments and accompanying financial exposure has only occurred in limited instances in the past, should customers default on their payment obligations in the future or erroneous payment recovery be unsuccessful, we might be required to advance substantial amounts of funds to cover such obligations. In such an event, we may be required to seek additional sources of short-term liquidity, which may not be available on reasonable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Further, should a customer whose funds are reversed subsequently have financial difficulty, collection of the funds advanced by us on its behalf may be difficult.

Customer funds that we hold in trust are subject to market, interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks. The loss of these funds could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We invest funds held in trust for our customers in liquid, investment-grade marketable securities, money market securities, and other cash equivalents. Nevertheless, our customer fund assets are subject to general market, interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks. These risks may be exacerbated, individually or in unison, during periods of unusual financial market volatility. In the event of a global financial crisis, such as that experienced in 2008, we could be faced with a severe constriction of the availability of liquidity, which could impact our ability to fund payrolls. Any loss of or inability to access customer funds could have an adverse impact on our cash position and results of operations and could require us to obtain additional sources of liquidity, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

If we are required to collect sales and use taxes in additional jurisdictions, we might be subject to liability for past sales, and our future sales may decrease. Adverse tax laws or regulations could be enacted or existing laws could be applied to us or our customers, which could increase the costs of our services and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The application of federal, state, and local tax laws to services provided electronically is evolving. New income, sales, use, or other tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances could be enacted at any time (possibly with retroactive effect), and could be applied solely or disproportionately to services provided over the Internet. These enactments could adversely affect our sales activity due to the inherent cost increase the taxes would represent and ultimately have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, existing tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified, or applied adversely to us (possibly with retroactive effect), which could require us or our customers to pay additional tax amounts, as well as require us or our customers to pay fines or penalties and interest for past amounts.

For example, we might lose sales or incur significant expenses if states successfully impose broader guidelines on state sales and use taxes. A successful assertion by one or more states requiring us to collect sales or other taxes on the licensing of our software or provision of our services could result in substantial tax liabilities for past transactions and otherwise harm our business. Each state has different rules and regulations governing sales and use taxes, and these rules and regulations are subject to varying interpretations that change over time. We review these rules and regulations periodically and, when we believe we are subject to sales and use taxes in a particular state, we may voluntarily engage state tax authorities in order to determine how to comply with that state’s rules and regulations. There is no guarantee that we will not be subject to sales and use taxes or related penalties for past sales in states where we currently believe no such taxes are required.


Vendors of services, like us, are typically held responsible by taxing authorities for the collection and payment of any applicable sales and similar taxes. If one or more taxing authorities determines that taxes should have, but have not, been paid with respect to our services, we might be liable for past taxes in addition to taxes going forward. Liability for past taxes might also include substantial interest and penalty charges. Our customers are typically wholly responsible for applicable sales and similar taxes. Nevertheless, customers might be reluctant to pay back taxes and might refuse responsibility for interest or penalties associated with those taxes. If we are required to collect and to pay back taxes and the associated interest and penalties, and if our customers fail or refuse to reimburse us for all or a portion of these amounts, we will incur unplanned expenses that may be substantial. Moreover, imposition of such taxes on us going forward will effectively increase the cost of our software and services to our customers and might adversely affect our ability to retain existing customers or to gain new customers in the areas in which such taxes are imposed.

We have underfunded pension plan liabilities. We will require current and future operating cash flow to fund these shortfalls. We have no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy these obligations.

We maintain defined benefit pension plans covering employees who meet age and service requirements. While our U.S. pension plans have been closed and frozen, our net pension liability and cost is materially affected by the discount rate used to measure pension obligations, the longevity and actuarial profile of our plan participants, the level of plan assets available to fund those obligations, and the actual and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Significant changes in investment performance or a change in the portfolio mix of invested assets can result in corresponding increases and decreases in the valuation of plan assets, particularly equity securities, or in a change in the expected rate of return on plan assets. Assets available to fund the pension and other postemployment benefit obligations of our plans, as of December 31, 2018, were approximately $381.6 million, or approximately $162.6 million less than the measured pension and post-retirement benefit obligation on a GAAP basis. In addition, any changes in the discount rate could result in a significant increase or reduction in the valuation of pension obligations, affecting the reported funded status of our pension plans as well as the net periodic pension cost in the following years. Similarly, changes in the expected return on plan assets can result in significant changes in the net periodic pension cost in the following years.

Our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for the first fiscal year beginning after the effective date of our IPO and in each year thereafter. Our auditors will also need to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in the future to the extent we are no longer an emerging growth company, as defined by the JOBS Act, and are not a smaller reporting company. In 2017, we identified a material weakness related to our assessment of valuation allowance and classification of deferred tax liabilities associated with intangible assets for 2016 and prior periods. We remediated the material weakness and did not have a material weakness in connection with the 2017 audit; however, we cannot guarantee that we will not have additional material weaknesses in the future. If we are unable to maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or if we identify additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable toaccurately report our financial information accuratelyperformance on a timely basis, may suffer adverse regulatory consequences or violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules, may breach the covenants under our credit facilities,could materially and incur additional costs. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability of our financial statements, which could have a material adverse effect onadversely affect our business financial condition, and results of operations.

We have and will continue to incur increased costs and obligations as a result of being a public company.

As a publicly traded company, we have incurred and will continue to incur additional legal, accounting and other expenses that we were not required to incur in the past, and will incur additional expenses after we cease to be an emerging growth company (to the extent that we take advantage of certain exceptions from reporting requirements that are available under the JOBS Act as an emerging growth company). We are required to file with the SEC annual and quarterly information and other reports that are specified in Section 13 of the Exchange Act. We also are subject to other reporting and corporate governance requirements, including the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”), and certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, which will impose additional compliance obligations upon us. Among other things, as a public company:

we prepare and distribute periodic public reports and other stockholder communications in compliance with our obligations under the federal securities laws and applicable stock exchange rules;

the roles and duties of our Board and committees of the Board are expanded;


we comply with more comprehensive financial reporting and disclosure compliance functions;

we manage enhanced investor relations function; and

we involve and retain to a greater degree outside counsel and accountants in the activities listed above.

These changes require a commitment of additional resources, and many of our competitors already comply with these obligations. We may not be successful in implementing these requirements, and the commitment of resources required for implementing them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The changes necessitated by becoming a public company require a significant commitment of resources and management oversight that has increased and may continue to increase our costs and could place a strain on our systems and resources. As a result, our management’s attention might be diverted from other business concerns. If we are unable to offset these costs through other savings, then it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are an “emerging growth company” and have elected and may elect to continue to comply with certain of the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, which could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to: exemption from compliance with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation, and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. In addition, even if we comply with the greater obligations of public companies that are not emerging growth companies, we may avail ourselves of the reduced requirements applicable to emerging growth companies from time to time in the future. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we choose to continue to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

We will remain an emerging growth company until December 31, 2023, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenue exceeds $1.07 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period, whether or not issued in a registered offering.

We may not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss or research tax credit carryforwards, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

As of December 31, 2018, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards due to prior period losses, which, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2031 and 2019 for federal and state purposes, respectively. These net operating loss carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), our ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards or other tax attributes in any taxable year may be limited if we experience an “ownership change.” A Section 382 “ownership change” generally occurs if one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders who own at least 5% of our stock increase their ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage within a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. Future issuances of our stock could cause an “ownership change.” It is possible that an ownership change, or any future ownership change, could have a material effect on the use of our net operating loss carryforwards or other tax attributes, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and profitability.


Changes in generally accepted accounting principles in the United States could have a material adverse effect on our previously reported results of operations.

Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”), the SEC, and various bodies formed to promulgate and to interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our previously reported results of operations and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change.

In May 2014, the FASB issued new revenue recognition guidance under Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which is effective for our interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2017. Under this new guidance, revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. The new guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized. In order to be able to comply with the requirements of ASU 2014-09 beginning in the first quarter of 2019, we need to update and to enhance our internal accounting systems, processes, and our internal controls over financial reporting. This has required, and will continue to require, additional investments by us, and may require incremental resources and system configurations that could increase our operating costs in future periods. If we are not able to properly implement ASU 2014-09 in a timely manner, the revenue that we recognize and the related disclosures that we provide under ASU 2014-09 may not be complete or accurate, and we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations in a timely manner. We have completed our evaluation and implementation plan for adoption of this new guidance, and will be adopting the new standard effective first quarter of 2019.  

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

We are a holding company and rely on dividends, distributions, and other payments, advances, and transfers of funds from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations.

We are a holding company that does not conduct any business operations of our own. As a result, we are largely dependent upon cash transfers in the form of intercompany loans and receivables from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations. The deterioration of the earnings from, or other available assets of, our subsidiaries for any reason also could limit or impair their ability to pay dividends or other distributions to us.

Our outstanding indebtedness under our Senior Secured Credit Facility could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our ability to operate our business, and we may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our debt service obligations.

Our outstanding indebtedness as of December 31, 2018 consistedPursuant to our credit agreement, we are a borrower of (i) a Senior Term Loan in the original principal amount of $680.0 million term loan debt facility (the "Term Debt") and (ii) a $300.0 million committed Revolving Facility. Therevolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility") (collectively, the "Senior Secured Credit Facility"). Our Senior Secured Credit Facilities areFacility is secured substantially by all of our assets. The Senior Term Loan has a maturity date of April 30, 2025, and the Revolving Facility has a maturity date of April 30, 2023. As of December 31, 2018, we had $678.3 million outstanding principal under our Senior Term Loan and no principal outstanding under our Revolving Facility.

Our outstanding indebtedness and any additional indebtedness we incur may have important consequences for us, including, without limitation, that:

we may be required to use a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay the principal of and interest on our indebtedness;

our indebtedness and leverage may increase our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions, as well as to competitive pressures;

our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and for general corporate and other purposes may be limited;

our indebtedness may expose us to the risk of increased interest rates because certain of our borrowings, including and most significantly our borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities,Facility, are at variable rates of interest;

and

our indebtedness may prevent us from taking advantage of business opportunities as they arise or successfully carrying out our plans to expand our business; and

business.

our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry may be limited.


Under the terms of the agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities,debt facilities, we are required to comply with specified operating covenants and, under certain circumstances, a financial covenant applicable to the Revolving Credit Facility, which may limit our ability to operate our business as we otherwise might operate it. For example, the obligations under the Senior Credit Facilities may be accelerated upon the occurrence of an event of default, including, without limitation, payment defaults, cross-defaults to certain material indebtedness, covenant defaults, material inaccuracy of representations and warranties, bankruptcy events, material judgments, material defects with respect to guarantees and collateral, and change of control. If not cured, an event of default under our Senior Secured Credit Facility could result in any amounts outstanding, including any accrued interest and unpaid fees, becoming immediately due and payable, which would require us, among other things, to seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets, to refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness, to sell selected assets, and/or to reduce or to delay planned capital or operating expenditures. Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt, and any such financing or refinancing might not be available on economically favorable terms or at all. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our debt service obligations or are forced to take additional measures to be able to service our indebtedness, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Despite our substantial indebtedness, weAspects of the Capped Calls may not operate as planned and may affect the value of the Convertible Senior Notes and our subsidiaries may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

We may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Although the agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictionscommon stock, and we are subject to counterparty credit risk with respect to the Capped Calls.

In March 2021, we issued $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 ("Convertible Senior Notes"). In connection with the pricing of the Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into capped call transactions with the option counterparties ("the Capped Calls"). Please refer to Note 9, "Debt," for additional information. The Capped Calls are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution to our common stock upon any conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes and/or offset any potential cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal

20 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

amount of converted Convertible Senior Notes, as the case may be, with such reduction and/or offset subject to a cap. The Capped Calls are complex transactions that are not part of the terms of the Convertible Senior Notes, and may not operate as planned. If the Capped Calls do not operate as we intend, it may have an effect on the price of the Convertible Senior Notes or our common stock.

The option counterparties or their respective affiliatesmay modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding various derivatives with respect to our common stock and/or purchasing or selling our common stock or other securities of ours in secondary market transactions following any conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes, any repurchase of the Convertible Senior Notes by us on any fundamental change repurchase date, any redemption date, or any other date on which the Convertible Senior Notes are retired by us, in each case if we exercise our option to terminate the relevant portion of the Capped Calls. This activity could cause or avoid an increase or a decrease in the market price of our common stock or the Convertible Senior Notes, which could affect the ability of a noteholder to convert the Convertible Senior Notes and, to the extent the activity occurs during any observation period related to a conversion of Convertible Senior Notes, could affect the number of qualificationsshares of common stock, if any, and exceptions,value of the consideration that a noteholder will receive upon conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes. If any such Capped Call fails to become effective, the option counterparties or their respective affiliates may unwind their hedge positions with respect to our common stock, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock and the indebtednessvalue of the Convertible Senior Notes. The option counterparties are financial institutions, and we can incur in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. For example, pursuantare subject to incremental facilitiesthe risk that they might default under the Senior Credit Facilities,Capped Calls. Our exposure to the credit risk of the option counterparties is not secured by any collateral. If an option counterparty becomes subject to insolvency proceedings, we will become an unsecured creditor in those proceedings with a claim equal to our exposure at that time under our transactions with that option counterparty. Our exposure will depend on many factors, but, generally, the increase in our exposure will be correlated with increases in the market price or the volatility of our common stock. In addition, upon a default by an option counterparty, we may incur upsuffer adverse tax consequences and more dilution than we currently anticipate with respect to (i)our common stock. We can provide no assurances as to the financial stability or viability of any option counterparty.

Risks associated with the conversion of our Convertible Senior Notes may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Under certain circumstances, noteholders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes at their option prior to the scheduled maturities. Upon conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes, we will be obligated to make cash payments in an aggregate amount no less than the principal amount being converted, and any excess of the conversion value over the principal amount will be settled, at the Company’s election, in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition, noteholders will have the right to require us to repurchase their Convertible Senior Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change at a repurchase price equal to the greater of (x) $125.0 million and (y) 100% of EBITDAthe principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the fundamental change repurchase date (as defined in the agreements governingIndenture under which the Convertible Senior Credit Facilities)Notes were issued ("Indenture")). There is a risk that we may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of additional securedConvertible Senior Notes surrendered therefor or unsecured debt plus (ii) an unlimited additional amountConvertible Senior Notes being converted. Our failure to repurchase Convertible Senior Notes when the Indenture requires the repurchase or to pay any cash payable on future conversions of securedthe Convertible Senior Notes as required by the Indenture would constitute a default under the Indenture. A default under the Indenture or unsecured debt, subjectthe fundamental change itself could also lead to compliance with certain leverage-based tests, as described in thea default under agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities.future indebtedness. If we incur additional debt, the risks associated with our substantial leverage would increase.

Restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategies.

The agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities contain a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us, and may limit our ability to engage in acts that may be in our long-term best interests. These include covenants restricting, among other things, our (and our subsidiaries’) ability:

to incur additional indebtedness or other contingent obligations;

to grant liens;

to enter into burdensome agreements with negative pledge clauses or restrictions on subsidiary distributions;

to pay dividends or make other distributions in respect of equity;

to make payments in respect of subordinated debt;

to make investments, including acquisitions, loans, and advances;

to consolidate, to merge, to liquidate, or to dissolve;

to sell, to transfer, or to otherwise dispose of assets;

to engage in transactions with affiliates;

to materially alter the business that we conduct; and

to amend or to otherwise change the termsrepayment of the documentation governing certain restricted debt.


The agreements governing Senior Credit Facilities contains a financial covenant applicable onlyrelated indebtedness were to the Revolving Facility, which requires that we maintain a ratio of consolidated first lien debt to EBITDA (with certain adjustments as set forth in the agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities) below a specified level on a quarterly basis. However, such requirement is applicable at the end of a fiscal quarter only if more than 35% of the Revolving Facility (with an exclusion for certain letters of credit) is drawn at the end of such fiscal quarter. Our ability to meet that financial ratio can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to meet that ratio. The covenant did not apply as of December 31, 2018, but there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance with such covenant in the future. A breach of any covenant or restriction contained in the agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities could result in a default under those agreements. If any such default occurs, a majority of the lenders under the Senior Credit Facilities (or, in the case of the financial covenant described above, a majority of the lenders under the Revolving Facility), may elect (after the expiration ofaccelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods)periods, we may not have sufficient funds to declarerepay the indebtedness and repurchase the Convertible Senior Notes or make cash payments upon conversions thereof. In addition, even if noteholders do not elect to convert their Convertible Senior Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all outstanding borrowings, together with accrued and unpaid interest and other amounts payable thereunder, to be immediately due and payable. The lenders under the Senior Term Loan and Revolving Facility also have the right upon an event of default thereunder to terminate any commitments they have to provide further borrowings. Further, following an event of default under the agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities, the administrative agent, on behalfor a portion of the secured parties underoutstanding principal of the Convertible Senior Credit Facilities, will have the right to proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that debt. If the debt under the Senior Term Loan or Revolving Facility was to be accelerated, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full that debt or any other debt that may become dueNotes as a result of that acceleration.

In the future, we may be dependent upon our lenders for financing to execute our business strategy and to meet our liquidity needs. If our lenders are unable to fund borrowings under their credit commitments or we are unable to borrow, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

During periods of volatile credit markets, there is risk that lenders, even those with strong balance sheets and sound lending practices, could fail or refuse to honor their legal commitments and obligations under existing credit commitments, including but not limited to, extending credit up to the maximum amount permitted by the Revolving Facility. If our lenders are unable to fund borrowings under their revolving credit commitments or we are unable to borrow, it could be difficult to obtain sufficient funding to execute our business strategy or to meet our liquidity needs,current, rather than long-term, liability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our debt may be downgraded, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

A reduction in the ratings that rating agencies assign to our short and long-term debt may negatively impact our access to the debt capital markets and increase our cost of borrowing, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Volatility and weakness in bank and capital markets may adversely affect credit availability and related financing costs for us.

Banking and capital markets can experience periods of volatility and disruption. If the disruption in these markets is prolonged, our ability to refinance, and the related cost of refinancing, some or all of our debt could be adversely affected. Although we currently can access the bank and capital markets, there is no assurance that such markets will continue to be a reliable source of financing for us. These factors, including the tightening of credit markets, could adversely affect our ability to obtain cost-effective financing. Increased volatility and disruptions in the financial markets also could make it more difficult and more expensive for us to refinance outstanding indebtedness and to obtain financing. In addition, the adoption of new statutes and regulations, the implementation of recently enacted laws, or new interpretations or the enforcement of older laws and regulations applicable to the financial markets or the financial services industry couldwould result in a reduction in the amount of available credit or an increase in the cost of credit. Disruptions in the financial markets can also adversely affect our lenders, insurers, customers, and other counterparties. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The interest ratesreduction of our term loans are priced using a spread over LIBOR.net working capital.

LIBOR, the London interbank offered rate, is the basic rate of interest used in lending between banks on the London interbank market and is widely used as a reference for setting the interest rate on loans globally. We typically use LIBOR as a reference rate in the term loans and revolving loans made under our credit facilities such that the interest due to our creditors pursuant to a term loan or revolving loan extended to us under our credit facilities is calculated using the LIBOR rate plus an applicable spread above LIBOR.


On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. It is unclear whether or not LIBOR will cease to exist at that time or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. If LIBOR ceases to be available, we are entitled to negotiate with the administrative agent under our credit facilities to amend the governing credit agreement to establish a successor benchmark rate that is generally accepted by the syndicated loan market for loans denominated in U.S. Dollars.  If lenders holding more than a majority of the loans and commitments under our credit facilities have not objected to the proposed successor benchmark rate within five business days following the date on which the related amendment is posted for review by the lenders, the amendment will be deemed to have been approved by the lenders and may become effective.  At this time, due to a lack of consensus as to what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR, it is impossible to predict the effect of any such alternatives on our liquidity, interest expense, or the value of the term loans or revolving loans.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may be volatile and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

Securities markets worldwide have experienced in the past, and are likely to experience in the future, significantThe market price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market, or political conditions could reduce the market price of our common stock regardlesstrading has experienced, and may continue to experience, wide fluctuations and volatility. Factors that may impact our performance and market price include those discussed elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and others such as: announcements, including filing with the SEC by us or our resultscompetitors of operations. The trading price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide price fluctuations in response to various factors, including, among other things, the risk factors described herein and other factors beyond our control. Factors affecting the trading price of our common stock could include:

market conditions in the broader stock market;

actualacquisitions, business plans or anticipated variationscommercial relationships as well as new services; any major change in our quarterly resultssenior management or board of operations;

developments in our industry in general;

variations in operating results of similar companies;

introduction of new services by us, our competitors, or our customers;

issuance of new, negative, or changed securities analysts’ reports or recommendations or estimates;

investor perceptions of us and the industries in which we or our customers operate;

director; sales, or anticipated sales, of our stock, including sales by our officers, directors, and significant stockholders;

additions issuance of new, negative, or departureschanged securities analysts’ reports or

21 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of key personnel;Contents

regulatory

recommendations or political developments;

the public’s response to press releases or other public announcements by us or third parties, including our filings with the SEC;

announcements, media reports or other public forum comments related to litigation, claims or reputational charges against us;

guidance, if any, that we provide to the public, any changes in this guidance, or our failure to meet this guidance;

the development and sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock;

estimates; investor perceptions of us and the investment opportunity associated withindustries in which we or our common stock relative to other investment alternatives;


other events or factors, including those resulting from system failures and disruptions, earthquakes, hurricanes, war, acts of terrorism, other natural disasters or responses to these events;

changes in accounting principles;

share-based compensation expense under applicable accounting standards;

customers operate; and threatened or actual litigation and governmental investigations; andinvestigations.

changing economic conditions.

These and other factors may cause the market price and demand for shares of our common stock to fluctuate substantially, which may limit or prevent investors from readily selling their shares of common stock and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock. In addition, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the past, whenoverall market and in the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock sometimes have instituted securities class action litigation against the company that issued the stock.company’s securities. Securities litigation against us, regardless of the merits or outcome, could result in substantial costs, damage to our reputation, and divert the time and attention of our management from our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Future salesThe issuance of additional stock, including common stock issued upon conversion of our commonConvertible Senior Notes, will dilute all other stockholders.

The issuance of additional stock or the perception in the public markets that these sales may occur, could cause the market price for our common stock to decline.

As of February 25, 2019, there were 140,514,889 shares of our common stock outstanding.  Additionally, as of December 31, 2018, we also have 28,672,211 registered shares of common stock reserved for issuance underconnection with acquisitions, financings, our equity incentive plans, of which options to purchase 13,916,146 shares of common stock and 664,073 restricted stock units representing 14,580,219 shares of common stock are outstanding. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales of shares of our common stockConvertible Senior Notes or the availability of shares of our common stock for saleotherwise will have on the market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that those sales will occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Of the 139,453,710 shares of common stock outstanding, 96,441,093 shares are restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act and subject to certain restrictions on resale. Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if they are registered under the Securities Act, or are sold pursuant to an exemption from registration such as Rule 144 or Rule 701. We have granted customary demand and piggyback registration rights to the Sponsors and certain of ourdilute all other stockholders party to the registration rights agreement with us. Should the Sponsors or any other stockholders further exercise their registration rights, the shares registered would no longer be restricted securities and would be freely tradable in the open market.

Cannae holds approximately 23.3% of our outstanding common stock as of February 25, 2019. On November 7, 2018, Cannae announced that one of its subsidiaries had entered into a three-year margin loan pursuant to which it could borrow up to $300.0 million. The margin loan is guaranteed by Cannae for a period of up to one year and is further secured by a pledge of 25.0 million shares of our common stock beneficially owned by Cannae. The loan requires that a certain loan to value ratio (based on the value of the shares of our common stock pledged to secure the loan) be maintained. In the event that the ratio is not maintained, the borrower must post additional cash collateral and/or elect to repay a portion of the loan. The loan also contains provisions that, subject to their terms, effectively require prepayment in the event of certain customary events of default, including Cannae’s failure to comply with specified financial ratios or the triggering of a requirement of prepayment under any other material indebtedness. In the event that Cannae borrows under the margin loan and there is an event of default, if Cannae fails to pledge additional cash collateral and/or repay a portion of the loan when it is required to do so or if Cannae otherwise fails to comply with the respective terms of the margin loan and the lender accelerates payment of all amounts outstanding under the loan as a result of this non-compliance, then the lender could foreclose on the pledged shares and sell the shares of common stock in the open market, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. In addition, certain lenders under the margin loan may elect at any time to hedge their exposure to the shares of common stock in transactions that could directly or indirectly impact the price of our common stock.


Claims for indemnification by our directors and officers may reduce our available funds to satisfy successful third party claims against us and may reduce the amount of money available to us.

stockholders. Our thirdfourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue up to five hundred million shares of common stock and amendedup to ten million shares of preferred stock with such rights and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers, in each case, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Pursuant to our charter, our directors will notpreferences as may be liable to the company or any stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty, except (i) for acts that breach his or her duty of loyalty to the company or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions without good faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing violation of the law, (iii) pursuant to Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. The bylaws also require us, if so requested, to advance expenses that such director or officer incurred in defending or investigating a threatened or pending action, suit or proceeding, provided that such person will return any such advance if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to indemnification by us. Any claims for indemnification by our directors and officers may reduce our available fundsboard of directors. Subject to satisfy successful third party claims against us and may reduce the amount of money available to us.

We have elected to take advantage of the “controlled company” exemption to the corporate governance rules for publicly-listed companies, which could make our common stock less attractive to some investors or otherwise harm our stock price.

Because we qualify as a “controlled company” under the corporate governance rules for publicly-listed companies, we are not required to have a majority of our Board be independent under thecompliance with applicable rules and regulations, we may issue all of the NYSE, nor are we required to have a compensation committee or a corporate governance and nominating committee comprised entirely of independent directors. In light of our status as a controlled company, our Board has established a compensation committee, and a corporate governance and nominating committeethese shares that are not comprised solelyalready outstanding without any action or approval by our stockholders. We intend to continue to evaluate strategic acquisitions or opportunities in the future. We may pay for such acquisitions or opportunities, in part or in full, through the issuance of independent members.  We do, however, have a majorityadditional equity securities. Further, the conversion of independent directors serving on our Board. Should the interests of our Sponsors differ from those of other stockholders, the other stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject tosome or all of the corporate governance rules for publicly-listed companies. Our status as a controlled company could make our common stock less attractive to some investors or otherwise harm our stock price.

We are party to a voting agreement with our Sponsors, which provides our Sponsors with rights to nominate a numberConvertible Senior Notes will dilute the ownership interests of designees to our Board.

In connection with the IPO, we entered into a voting agreement with THL and Cannae. Pursuantexisting stockholders to the voting agreement, for so long as THL and Cannae collectively hold 50% or more of the then outstanding voting power, then THL and Cannae shall have the power to designate a total of five directors to the Board. After THL and Cannae cease to collectively hold 50% or more of the then outstanding voting power, then each of THL and Cannae will be able to in their own right designate four directors, for so long as it holds at least 40% of the then outstanding voting power; three directors, for so long as it holds at least 30% of the then outstanding voting power; two directors, for so long as it holds at least 20% of the then outstanding voting power; and one director, for so long as it holds at least 10% of the then outstanding voting power. The voting agreement will terminate as to each Sponsor when the Sponsor is no longer entitled to designate a director to the Board, and will terminate upon the time when neither Sponsor is entitled to designate a director to the Board. Additionally, in the event a lender forecloses on anyextent we deliver shares of our common stock pledged in connection withupon conversion of any loan, advances or extensions of credit that Cannae may enter into, it could have an effect on THL and Cannae’s ability to designate directors under the voting agreement.

The voting agreement grants the Sponsors the right to determine the total number of directors during the term of the voting agreement. The Sponsors could use this provision to maintain a majority representation even if they collectively hold less than 50% of the outstanding voting power by decreasing the size of the Board. THL and Cannae may have a right to designate a majority of our Board under the present Board composition even if they collectively or individually hold less than 50% of our then outstanding voting power. Finally, pursuant to the voting agreement, for so long as each Sponsor is entitled to designate a director to the Board, the Sponsors will be required to vote all of their shares, and take all other necessary actions, to cause the Board to include the individuals designated as directors by the Sponsors (as applicable). As a result, it is possible that the interests of THL and Cannae may in some circumstances conflict with our interests and the interests of our other stockholders.Convertible Senior Notes.


Because we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, investors may not receive any return on investment unless they are able to sell common stock for a price greater than the purchase price.

We have never declared nor paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not expect to declare or to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, stockholders must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment. We do not intend in the foreseeable future to pay any dividends to holders of our common stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future to repay indebtedness and to support our general corporate purposes. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your common stock for the foreseeable future, and the success of an investment in shares of our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in their value. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which investors have purchased their shares. However, the payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board, subject to applicable law, and will depend on, among other things, our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions that apply to the payment of dividends, and other considerations that our Board deems relevant. As a consequence of these limitations and restrictions, we may not be able to make the payment of dividends on our common stock.

Anti-takeover protections in our thirdfourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our amended and restated bylaws or our contractual obligations may discourage or prevent a takeover of our company, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders.

Provisions contained in our thirdfourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws as well as provisions of the DGCLDelaware law could delay or make it more difficult to remove incumbent directors or could impede a merger, takeover or other business combination involving us or the replacement of our management, or discourage a potential investor from making a tender offer for our common stock, which, under certain circumstances, could reduce the market value of our common stock, even if it would benefit our stockholders.

In addition, our Board has the authority to cause us to issue, without any further vote or action by the stockholders, up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, in one or more series, to designate the number of shares constituting any series, and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions thereof, including dividend rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption, redemption price, or prices and liquidation preferences of such series. The issuance of shares of preferred stock or the adoption of a stockholder rights plan may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company without further action by the stockholders, even where stockholders are offered a premium for their shares.

In addition, under the agreements governing our Senior Credit Facilities,credit facilities, a change of control would cause us to be in default. Indefault or could trigger dilutive or additional expenses. For example, in the event of a change of control default, the administrative agent under our Senior Credit Facilitiescredit facilities would have the right (or, at the direction of lenders holding a majority of the loans and commitments under our Senior Credit Facilities,credit facilities, the obligation) to accelerate the outstanding loans and to terminate the commitments under our Senior Credit Facilities,credit facilities, and if so accelerated, we would be required to repay all of our outstanding obligations under our credit facilities.

Further, certain provisions in the Convertible Senior Credit Facilities.Notes and the Indenture could increase the cost of acquiring us or otherwise discourage a third party from acquiring us or removing incumbent management, including in a transaction that noteholders or holders of our common stock may view as favorable.

22 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

General Risk Factors

Our business has been adversely affected and will likely continue to be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic

The global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has created significant global volatility, uncertainty, and economic disruption. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to adversely affect our business, operations, and financial results will depend on numerous evolving factors. During 2021, COVID-19 outbreak continued to create significant volatility and uncertainty and economic and financial market disruption. The extent of any impact to our business depends on developments which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the COVID-19 pandemic’s, our ability to sell and to provide our services to our current and future customers, and the ability of our customers to pay for our services or to make us whole for advances of earned net wages and associated tax amounts made on their behalf by us.

As we cannot predict the duration or scope of the COVID-19 pandemic, the anticipated negative financial impact to our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or stock price cannot be reasonably estimated, but could be material and could last for an extended period of time. Nevertheless, given the global nature of our business we may experience variation in the impact of COVID-19 across geographies in terms of the degree, timing or duration of impact.

Catastrophic events may disrupt our business which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to capital markets and borrowing costs may be adversely affected by a major natural disaster or catastrophic event, including civil unrest, geopolitical instability, war, terrorist attack, the effects of climate change, or pandemics or other public health emergencies such as the recent COVID-19 outbreak, and measures taken in response thereto. In the event of a major disaster or event impacting any of our locations, we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure system interruptions, reputational harm, delays in our application development, lengthy interruptions in our services, breaches of data security and loss of critical data, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We operate and are subject to tax in multiple jurisdictions. Audits, investigations, and tax proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We are subject to income and non-income taxes in multiple jurisdictions. Income tax accounting often involves complex issues, and significant judgment is often required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. We are regularly subject to tax examinations in these jurisdictions during which the tax authorities may challenge our tax positions. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these examinations to determine the appropriateness of our tax reserves as well as our future tax liabilities. In addition, from time to timethe application of withholding tax, value added tax, goods and services tax, sales tax, and other non-income taxes is not always certain and we may enter into contractsbe subject to examinations relating to such withholding or non-income taxes. We believe that containour tax positions are reasonable and our tax reserves are adequate to cover any potential liability. However, if any of these tax authorities successfully challenge our positions, we may be liable for additional tax, penalties, and interest in excess of any reserves established, which may have a significant impact on our results and operations and future cash flow.

Changes in generally accepted accounting principles in the United States could have a material adverse effect on our previously reported results of operations.

Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”), the SEC, and various bodies formed to promulgate and to interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our previously reported results of control provisionsoperations and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change. Please refer to Part II, Item 8, Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, of this report for our assessment of recently issued and adopted accounting pronouncements.

23 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Our debt may be downgraded, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

A reduction in the ratings that limit the value of, or even terminate, the contract upon a change of control. These change of control provisions may discourage a takeover of our company, even if an acquisition would be beneficialrating agencies assign to our stockholders.debt may negatively impact our access to the debt capital markets and increase our cost of borrowing, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Volatility and weakness in bank and capital markets may adversely affect credit availability and related financing costs for us.

Disruptions in the financial markets can also adversely affect our lenders, insurers, customers, and other counterparties. During periods of volatile credit markets, there is risk that lenders, even those with strong balance sheets and sound lending practices, could fail, no longer participate in credit offerings, or refuse to honor their existing legal commitments and obligations to us, including but not limited to, extending credit up to the maximum amount permitted by the Revolving Credit Facility. If our lenders are unable to fund borrowings under their revolving credit commitments or we are unable to borrow or refinance our debt in the financial markets, it could be difficult to obtain sufficient funding to execute our business strategy or to meet our liquidity needs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Item 1B. UnresolvedUnresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Our corporate headquarters is located in Minneapolis, Minnesota and consists of approximately 195,000 square feet of space.

Wewe also have a major North American offices in: Atlanta, Georgia; Fountain Valley, California; Honolulu, Hawaii; Montreal, Canada; Ottawa, Canada; St. Petersburg, Florida;office location in Toronto, Canada; and Winnipeg, Canada.Ontario, Canada, both in leased facilities. In addition, as of December 31, 2021, we have officeslease office space in Ebene, Mauritius,various other locations across North America, APJ, and in Glasgow, Scotland. We lease all facilities, except forEMEA. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we sold our St. Petersburg, Florida facility, which we own.and continue to lease office space at that location. We believe that our current facilities meet our needs, and we are confident that we will be able to obtain additional space on commercially reasonable terms to accommodate future growth.

From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not presently a party to any legal proceedings that, if determined adversely to us, we believe would individually or taken together have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or liquidity. Discussion of Legal Matters is incorporated by reference from Part II, Item 8, Note 15,17, “Commitments and Contingencies,” of this Form 10-K and should be considered an integral part of Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings”.

On October 21, 2021, a claim was issued by purported stockholder, Bluemoon Capital Ltd., in the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario, Canada. The claim is against the Company, together with David Ossip, Chair and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Arthur Gitajn, former EVP and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, Gnaneshwar Rao, director of the Company and Brent Bickett, director of the Company, as well as certain third parties. The action, which is a proposed class action, alleges misrepresentations and negligence in connection with the disclosure made by the Company in its April 25, 2018 Prospectuses (which were later incorporated by reference into the Company’s May 24, 2018 Interim Financial Statements and MD&A) regarding matters surrounding the Company’s distribution to its pre-IPO stockholders of its 50% interest in LifeWorks Corporation Ltd. On January 19, 2022, the Ontario court rejected the Norwich Application for discovery by plaintiff (equitable or discretionary remedy in Canada for disclosure of documentation to form an action), which had been filed prior to filing the class action on the basis that it did not meet the key criteria for pre-action discovery. Plaintiff has appealed this decision.

The action seeks unspecified monetary damages under the Ontario Securities Act and at common law.

At this early stage of the proceeding, the ultimate disposition is not yet determinable, but the Company believes that the likelihood of a material loss arising out of this claim is remote.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.


24 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K



Table of ContentsPART II

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information for Common Stock

Our common stock has traded on the NYSENew York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the TSXToronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “CDAY” since April 26, 2018.  Prior to that time, there was no2018, the date of our initial public market for our shares.  offering.

Dividend Policy

We do not currently intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. However, in the future, subject to factors described below and our future liquidity and capitalization, we may change this policy and choose to pay dividends.

Stockholders

As of December 31, 2018,2021, there were 17564 stockholders of record of our common stock. The actual number of stockholders is considerably greater than this number of record holders, and includes stockholders who are beneficial owners but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The following sets forth information regarding all unregistered securities sold by the Registrant in transactions that were exempt from the requirements of the Securities Act during the year ended December 31, 2018:None.

On April 30, 2018, the Registrant sold 4,545,455 shares of common stock in a private placement to THL / Cannae Investors LLC, a price of $22.00 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000,000.

From January 1, 2018 to March 2, 2018, the Registrant granted options to one employee to purchase an aggregate of 175,000 shares of its common stock under the 2013 Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) with an exercise price of $20.96 per share.

From January 1, 2018 to March 30, 2018, the Registrant issued 12,174 shares of its common stock to a total of six employees or former employees upon the exercise of options previously granted under the 2013 Plan at strike prices ranging from $13.46 to $16.80 per share.

From January 1, 2018 to March 9, 2018, the Registrant issued 76,190 shares of its common stock to two employees upon the vesting of restricted stock units granted under the 2013 Plan with a fair market value of $20.96 per share.

The shares of common stock in all of the transactions listed above were issued or will be issued in reliance upon Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act or Rule 701 promulgated under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act as the sale of such securities did not or will not involve a public offering. The recipients of the securities in each of these transactions represented their intentions to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were placed upon the stock certificates issued in these transactions. All recipients had adequate access, through their relationships with the Registrant, to information about the Registrant.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.


Stock Performance Graph

The following shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or incorporated by reference into any of our other filings under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

25 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder returns on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 5001500 Application Software Index. The graph assumes $100 was invested in each, based on closing prices, from our initial public offering to the last trading day of each quarter for the period April 26, 2018 (the date our common stock began trading on the NYSE) through December 31, 2018.2021. Stock price performance shown in the Stock Performance Graph for our common stock is historical and not necessarily indicative of future performance.

img213354928_2.jpg 



Prepared by Zacks Investment Research, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved. Copyright 1980-2022.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.[Reserved]

The following tables set forth selected historical consolidated financial data for the periods as of the dates indicated. We derived the consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

In the second quarter of 2018, contemporaneously with our IPO and concurrent private placement, we distributed our controlling financial interest in LifeWorks to our stockholders of record prior to the IPO on a pro rata basis in accordance with their pro rata interests in us. As a result, the financial statements in this26 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K have been adjusted to reflect the LifeWorks Disposition and show the former LifeWorks business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.


Table of Contents

Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results of operations. You should read the information set forth below together with “Management’s

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.Operations.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share amounts)

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

746.4

 

 

$

670.8

 

 

$

623.4

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

425.8

 

 

 

407.5

 

 

 

396.4

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

 

270.7

 

 

 

223.0

 

 

 

225.3

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

12.9

 

Operating profit (loss)

 

 

52.8

 

 

 

33.0

 

 

 

(11.2

)

Interest expense, net

 

 

83.2

 

 

 

87.1

 

 

 

87.4

 

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

(30.4

)

 

 

(54.1

)

 

 

(98.6

)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

(49.6

)

 

 

6.7

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

 

(38.1

)

 

 

(4.5

)

 

 

(105.3

)

(Loss) income from discontinued operations

 

 

(25.8

)

 

 

(6.0

)

 

 

12.5

 

Net loss

 

 

(63.9

)

 

 

(10.5

)

 

 

(92.8

)

Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

0.1

 

Net loss attributable to Ceridian

 

$

(63.4

)

 

$

(9.2

)

 

$

(92.9

)

Net loss per share attributable to Ceridian:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(0.62

)

 

$

(0.46

)

 

$

(1.65

)

Diluted

 

$

(0.62

)

 

$

(0.46

)

 

$

(1.65

)

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

114,049,682

 

 

 

65,204,960

 

 

 

64,988,338

 

Diluted

 

 

114,049,682

 

 

 

65,204,960

 

 

 

64,988,338

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents

 

$

217.8

 

 

$

94.2

 

 

$

120.8

 

Total assets

 

 

5,154.4

 

 

 

6,729.9

 

 

 

6,326.0

 

Long-term debt (1)

 

 

663.5

 

 

 

1,119.8

 

 

 

1,139.8

 

Total liabilities

 

 

3,622.4

 

 

 

5,600.9

 

 

 

5,320.1

 

Working capital

 

 

169.9

 

 

 

175.2

 

 

 

196.0

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,532.0

 

 

$

1,091.2

 

 

$

967.2

 

(1)

Excludes the current portion of our long-term debt of $6.8 million as of December 31, 2018, $0.0 million as of December 31, 2017, $2.3 million as of December 31, 2016.


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations as of, and for, the periods presented. You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding industry outlook, our expectations for the future of our business, and our liquidity and capital resources as well as other non-historical statements. These statements are based on current expectations and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risks and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by these forward-looking statements.

OverviewThe following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations covers fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2020 items and year-over-year comparisons between fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2020. Discussions of fiscal 2019 items and year-over-year comparisons between fiscal 2020 and 2019 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, that was filed with the SEC on February 26, 2021.

Overview

Ceridian is a global HCM software company. We categorize our solutions into two categories: Cloud and Bureau solutions. Cloud revenue is generated from HCM solutions that are delivered via two cloud offerings: Dayforce, our flagship cloud HCM platform, and Powerpay, a cloud HR and payroll solution for the Canadian small business market. We also continue to support customers using our legacy North America Bureau solutions, which we generally stopped actively selling to new customers following the acquisition of Dayforce, in 2012.and customers using our acquired Bureau solutions which we also intend to stop actively selling to new customers on a stand-alone basis. We invest in maintenance and necessary updates to support our Bureau customers and continue to migrate them to Dayforce.

Dayforce provides HR, payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management functionality. Our platform is used by organizations, regardless of industry or size, to optimize management of the entire employee lifecycle, including attracting, engaging, paying, deploying, and developing their people. Dayforce was built as a single application from the ground up that combines a modern, consumer-grade user experience with proprietary application architecture, including a single employee record and a rules engine spanning all areas of HCM. Dayforce provides continuous real-time calculations across all modules to enable, for example, payroll administrators access to data through the entire pay period, and managers access to real-time data to optimize work schedules. Our platform is designed to make work life better for our customers and their employees by improving HCM decision-making processes, streamlining workflows, exposingrevealing strategic organizational insights, and simplifying legislative compliance. The platform is designed to ease administrative work for both employees and managers, creating opportunities for companies to increase employee engagement. We are a founder-led organization, and our culture combines the agility and innovation of a start-up with a history of deep domain and operational expertise.

Dayforce Wallet is a digital wallet for customers' employees on the Dayforce platform, which was launched in the U.S. in 2020 and Canada in 2021. The Dayforce Wallet gives our customers’ employees greater control over their financial well-being by providing them with instant access to their earnings. This on-demand pay feature allows employees more choice over when they get paid by making any day payday. Dayforce Wallet enables workers to access their already-earned wages anytime during the pay period, net of taxes, withholdings and other payroll deductions. Leveraging Dayforce’s continuous pay calculations, Dayforce Wallet processes a same-day payroll each time a worker requests their pay. The solution is compliant with federal, state, and local remittances and requires no changes to payroll processing including the funding, timing, and close-out of pay. The on-demand wages are loaded onto a paycard, which customers’ employees can use anywhere credit or debit cards are accepted, generating interchange fee revenue. The Dayforce Wallet mobile app makes it easy for customers’ employees to check their pay deposits, account balance and transaction history.

As of December 31, 2021, we had more than 950 customers signed onto Dayforce Wallet with over 400 customers live on the product. As of December 31, 2021, the average registration rate increased to 33% of all eligible employees.

27 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

We sell Dayforce through our direct sales force on a subscription per-employee, per-month (“PEPM”) basis. Our subscriptions are typically structured with an initial fixed term of between three and five years, with evergreen renewal thereafter. Dayforce can serve customers of all sizes, ranging from 100 to over 100,000 employees. We have rapidly grown the Dayforce platform to more than 3,7005,434 live Dayforce customers,customers*, representing approximately 3.15.1 million active global usersusers* as of December 31, 2018.2021. In 2018,2021, we added over 715528 net new live Dayforce customers. Our customers vary across industries, and no single customer constituted more than 1% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018. We have experienced significant Cloud revenue growth at scale, particularly from Dayforce, which has grown at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of more than 55% since 2012.2021. Our annual Cloud revenue retention rate continues to exceed 95% due to our intense focus on solving complex problems and our superior customer experience. Please see below under "How We Assess Our Performance" for further explanation of our Cloud retention rate.

The following table presents Dayforce revenue by quarter from 2012 to 2018.


Our Business Model

Our business model focuses on supporting the rapid growth of Dayforce and maximizing the lifetime value of our Dayforce customer relationships. Due to our subscription model, where we recognize subscription revenues ratably over the term of the subscription period, and our high customer retention rates, we have a high level of visibility into our future revenues. The profitability of a customer to our business depends, in large part, on how long they have been a customer. Because in our current business model, PEPM subscription fees are not charged until the customer goes live, and because we incur costs in advance of receiving PEPM revenue that are not offset by our implementation fees, weWe estimate that it takes an average of 2.5approximately two years before we are able to recover our implementation, customer acquisition, and other direct costs on a new Dayforce customer contract. As the proportion of Dayforce customers who have been live for two or more years increases, our related profitability increases. The following sets forth the number of live Dayforce customers at the end of each quarter presented:

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December

31, 2018

 

 

September

30, 2018

 

 

June

30,2018

 

 

March

31,2018

 

 

December

31, 2017

 

 

September

30, 2017

 

 

June

30,2017

 

 

March

31,2017

 

 

December

31, 2016

 

 

September

30, 2016

 

 

June

30,2016

 

 

March

31,2016

 

Live Dayforce

   customers

 

 

3,718

 

 

 

3,465

 

 

 

3,308

 

 

 

3,154

 

 

 

3,001

 

 

 

2,855

 

 

 

2,690

 

 

 

2,480

 

 

 

2,339

 

 

 

2,148

 

 

 

2,014

 

 

 

1,872

 

Dayforce

   customers live

   for two or

   more years

 

 

2,339

 

 

 

2,148

 

 

 

2,014

 

 

 

1,872

 

 

 

1,770

 

 

 

1,628

 

 

 

1,524

 

 

 

1,377

 

 

 

1,276

 

 

 

1,116

 

 

 

997

 

 

 

816

 

Proportion

   of Dayforce

   customers live

   for two or

   more years

 

 

63

%

 

 

62

%

 

 

61

%

 

 

59

%

 

 

59

%

 

 

57

%

 

 

57

%

 

 

56

%

 

 

55

%

 

 

52

%

 

 

50

%

 

 

44

%

Over the lifetime of the customer relationship, we have the opportunity to realize additional PEPM revenue, both as the customer grows or rolls out the Dayforce solution to additional employees, and also by selling additional functionality to existing customers that do not currently utilize our full platform. We also incur costs to manage the account, to retain customers, and to sell additional functionality. These costs, however, are significantly less than the costs initially incurred to acquire and to implement the customer.take customers live.

How We Assess Our PerformanceRevenues

In assessing our performance, we consider a variety of performance indicators in addition to revenue and net income. Set forth below is a description of our key performance measures.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Live Dayforce customers

 

 

3,718

 

 

 

3,001

 

 

 

2,339

 

Annual Cloud revenue retention rate (a)

 

 

96.3

%

 

 

97.0

%

 

 

95.7

%

Cloud annualized recurring revenue (ARR) (a)

   (Dollars in millions)

 

$

506.2

 

 

$

391.0

 

 

$

289.7

 

Adjusted EBITDA (b) (Dollars in millions)

 

$

157.1

 

 

$

117.8

 

 

$

85.5

 

Adjusted EBITDA margin

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

17.6

%

 

 

13.7

%

(a)

Annual Cloud revenue retention rate and Cloud annualized recurring revenue are calculated on an annual basis, and the disclosure reflects data as of the most recent fiscal year end. Please see below for further explanation.

(b)

For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to operating profit, please see “Non-GAAP Measures.”


Live Dayforce Customers

We use the number of customers live on Dayforce as an indicator of future revenue and the overall performance of the business and to assess the performance of our implementation services. As shown in the following table, the number of customers live on Dayforce has increased from 482 as of December 31, 2012 to 3,718 as of December 31, 2018. In addition, we had over 450 net new Dayforce customers contracted, but not yet live on Dayforce as of December 31, 2018. We expect the majority of these Dayforce customers to be taken live in 2019. For 2018, our 3,718 live Dayforce customers represented over 3.1 million active users. We market Dayforce to customers of all sizes, including small (under 500 employees), mid-sized (501 to 2,500 employees), and enterprise (over 2,500 employees). For 2018, small businesses accounted for 14% of the total number of active customer employees, mid-sized businesses accounted for 32% of the total number of active customer employees, and enterprise businesses accounted for 54% of the total number of active customer employees. As our business and go-to-market strategy continues to evolve, in 2019, we will be modifying our customer segmentation for increased relevance.

From 2017 to 2018, live Dayforce customers increased from 3,001 to 3,718, a net increase of 717. Of the customers taken live during 2018, 77% represented net new customers to Dayforce, and the remainder were migration customers from our Bureau solution. Of the net new customers to Dayforce, small businesses accounted for 9% of the total number of active customer employees, mid-sized businesses accounted for 33% of the total number of active customer employees, and enterprise businesses accounted for 58% of the total number of active customer employees. Of the migration customers, small businesses accounted for 23% of the total number of active customer employees, mid-sized businesses accounted for 41% of the total number of active customer employees, and enterprise businesses accounted for 36% of the total number of active customer employees.

From 2016 to 2017, live Dayforce customers increased from 2,339 to 3,001, a net increase of 662. Of the customers taken live during 2017, 58% represented net new customers to Dayforce and the remainder were migration customers from our Bureau solutions. Of the net new customers to Dayforce, small businesses accounted for 13% of the total number of active customer employees, mid-sized businesses accounted for 33% of the total number of active customer employees, and enterprise businesses accounted for 54% of the total number of active customer employees. Of the migration customers, small businesses accounted for 20% of the total number of active customer employees, mid-sized businesses accounted for 48% of the total number of active customer employees, and enterprise businesses accounted for 32% of the total number of active customer employees.

The following table sets forth the number of live Dayforce customers at the end of the years presented:

Annual Cloud Revenue Retention Rate

Our annual Cloud revenue retention rate measures the percentage of revenues that we retain from our existing Cloud customers. We use this retention rate as an indicator of customer satisfaction and future revenues. We calculate the annual Cloud revenue retention rate as a percentage, where the numerator is the Cloud annualized recurring revenue for the prior year, less the Cloud annualized recurring revenue from lost Cloud customers during that year; and the denominator is the Cloud annualized recurring revenue for the prior year. Our annual Cloud revenue retention rate has been 95% or above for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016. We set annual targets for Cloud revenue retention rate and monitor progress toward those targets on a quarterly basis by reviewing known and anticipated customer losses. Our Cloud revenue retention rate may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including the mix of Cloud solutions used by customers, the level of customer satisfaction, and changes in the number of users live on our Cloud solutions.


Cloud Annualized Recurring Revenue (“ARR”)

We derive the majority of our Cloud revenues from recurring fees, primarily PEPM subscription charges. We also derive recurring revenue from fees related to the rental and maintenance of clocks, charges for once-a-year services, such as year-end tax statements, and investment income on our customer funds held in trust before such funds are remitted to taxing authorities, customer employees, or other third parties. To calculate Cloud ARR, we start with recurring revenue at year end, subtract the once-a-year charges, annualize the revenue for customers live for less than a full year to reflect the revenue that would have been realized if the customer had been live for a full year, and add back the once-a-year charges. We set annual targets for Cloud ARR and monitor progress toward those targets on a quarterly basis.

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin

We believe that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin, non-GAAP financial measures, are useful to management and investors as supplemental measures to evaluate our overall operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are components of our management incentive plan and are used by management to assess performance and to compare our operating performance to our competitors. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income or loss before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, as adjusted to exclude net income or loss from discontinued operations, sponsor management fees, non-cash charges for asset impairments, gains or losses on assets and liabilities held in a foreign currency other than the functional currency of a company subsidiary, share-based compensation expense, severance charges, restructuring consulting fees, transaction costs, and environmental reserve charges. Adjusted EBITDA margin is determined by calculating the percentage Adjusted EBITDA is of Total Revenue. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are helpful in highlighting management performance trends because Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin exclude the results of decisions that are outside the normal course of our business operations. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to operating profit, please see “Non-GAAP Measures.”

Our History

Ceridian was acquired in 2007 by affiliates and co-investors of the Sponsors. In April 2012, Ceridian acquired Dayforce Corporation, which had built Dayforce, a cloud HCM solution. In the months following the acquisition, Dayforce founder, David D. Ossip, was named Chief Executive Officer of Ceridian HCM, and shortly thereafter, we generally stopped actively selling our Bureau solutions to new customers in the United States to focus our resources on expanding the Dayforce platform and growing Cloud solutions. For each quarter since September 30, 2016, our Cloud revenue has surpassed our Bureau revenue. Cloud revenue grew from 39% of total revenue during the quarter ended December 31, 2015 to 74% of total revenue during the quarter ended December 31, 2018.

As part of our strategy to focus on the growth of our Cloud solutions business, we undertook the following initiatives to simplify our business model:

(i)

sold our consumer-directed benefit services business in 2013,

(ii)

merged Comdata, our payment systems business unit, with FleetCor Technologies in 2014,

(iii)

sold our benefits administration and post-employment compliance business in 2015,

(iv)

sold our United Kingdom and Ireland Bureau businesses and a portion of our operations that supported such businesses in Mauritius in 2016, and

(v)

contributed our LifeWorks employee assistance program business to a joint venture, LifeWorks, in 2016, then distributed our ownership in this joint venture to a holding company owned by our stockholders in April 2018 (the “LifeWorks Disposition”).

As a result of these transactions, we only actively sell Dayforce and Powerpay, which we believe simplifies our business model and positions us well for continued growth.

Our benefits administration and post-employee compliance business, our United Kingdom and Ireland businesses, our divested Mauritius operations, and our LifeWorks joint venture are presented as discontinued operations in our financial statements. Our consumer-directed benefits services business and our benefits administration and post-employment compliance business are collectively referred to as our “Divested Benefits Businesses.” After the LifeWorks Disposition, management has concluded that we have one operating and reportable segment. This conclusion aligns with how management monitors operating performance, allocates resources, and deploys capital. Please refer to Note 3, “Discontinued Operations,” to our consolidated financial statements for further information regarding these transactions.


On April 30, 2018, we completed our IPO, in which we issued and sold 21,000,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $22.00 per share. We granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase an additional 3,150,000 shares of common stock at the offering price, which was exercised in full. A total of 24,150,000 shares of common stock were issued on April 30, 2018, with gross proceeds of $531.3 million from the IPO before deducting underwriting discounts, commissions, and other offering expenses. Immediately subsequent to the closing of our IPO on April 30, 2018, THL / Cannae Investors LLC, one of our existing stockholders controlled by our Sponsors, purchased from us in a private placement $100.0 million of our common stock at a price per share equal to the offering price. Based on the offering price of $22.00 per share, 4,545,455 shares were issued in this private placement. Please refer to Note 1, “Organization,” for further discussion of the IPO transaction.

We applied a portion of the net proceeds from the IPO to satisfy and to discharge the indenture governing our outstanding $475.0 million principal amount Senior Notes, and they were redeemed on May 30, 2018. Concurrently, we also refinanced our remaining debt under our (i) $702.0 million (original principal amount) Senior Term Debt and (ii) $130.0 million Revolving Credit Facility, including accrued interest and related costs and expenses, with new senior credit facilities consisting of a $680.0 million term loan debt facility and a $300.0 million revolving credit facility. Please refer to Note 9, “Debt,” for further discussion of the debt transactions.

The IPO, private placement, and debt refinancing had the following impacts to our results of operations and cash during 2018:

 

 

Impacts to

Statement of

Operations

 

 

Impact to Cash

 

Gross proceeds from the IPO and private placement

 

 

 

 

 

$

631.3

 

Costs capitalized within stockholders' equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

(36.3

)

Redemption of Senior Notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

(475.0

)

Debt refinancing fees, reflected as a reduction to long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3.6

)

IPO and debt refinancing related expenses reflected

   within results of operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

$

(2.1

)

 

 

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative

 

 

(23.2

)

 

 

 

 

Impact on operating profit

 

$

(25.3

)

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(25.7

)

 

 

 

 

Impact on net loss

 

$

(51.0

)

 

 

(51.0

)

Non-cash IPO-related share-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.1

 

Non-cash interest expense adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.9

)

Cash to balance sheet from the IPO and private placement

 

 

 

 

 

$

68.6

 

Proceeds from issuance of the new $680.0 million Senior Term Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

680.0

 

Repayment of the $702.0 million Senior Term Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

(657.0

)

Cash to balance sheet from the IPO, private placement, and

   debt refinancing

 

 

 

 

 

$

91.6

 

On November 16, 2018, we completed a secondary offering, in which certain of our stockholders (the “Selling Stockholders”) sold 11,000,000 shares of common stock, in an underwritten public offering at $36.00 per share.  The Selling Stockholders granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase an additional 1,650,000 shares of common stock at the offering price, which was exercised in full.  A total of 12,650,000 shares of common stock were sold by the Selling Stockholders on November 16, 2018, with all proceeds going to the Selling Stockholders.  We incurred expenses of $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, related to the secondary offering within selling, general, and administrative expense.  


Components of Our Results of Operations

Revenues

We generate recurring revenues primarily from recurring fees charged for the use of our Cloud solutions, Dayforce and Powerpay, as well as from our Bureau solutions. We also generate professional services and other revenue associated primarily with the work performed to assist customers with the planning, design, implementation, and stagingimplementation of their cloud-based solution. Our solutions are typically provided through long-term customer relationships that result in a high level of recurring revenue. We also generate recurring services revenue from investment income on our Cloud and Bureau customer funds held in trust before such funds are remitted to taxing authorities, customer employees, or other third parties. We refer to this investment income as float revenue.

For Dayforce, we primarily charge monthly recurring fees on a PEPM basis, generally one-month in advance of service, based on the number and type of solutions provided to the customer and the number of employees and other users at the customer. Our standard Dayforce contracts are generally for a three to five-year period. The average time it takes to implement Dayforce typically ranges from three months for smaller customers to ninetwelve months for larger customers. Once Dayforce is implemented, the customer goes live, and weWe begin to generate recurring revenue.revenue when we provide a production instance to the customer, generally when they are ready to go live. We also provide outsourced human resource solutions to certain of our Dayforce customers, which are tailored to meet their individual needs, and entail performing the duties of a customer’s human resources department, including payroll processing, time and labor management, performance management, and recruiting, as needed.

The Powerpay offering isserves our solution designed primarily for small market Canadian customers. The typical Powerpay customer has fewer than 20 employees, and the majority of the revenue is generated from recurring fees charged on a per-employee, per-process basis. Typical processes include the customer’s payroll runs, year-end tax packages, and delivery of customers’ remittance advices or checks. Powerpay can typically be implemented on a remote basis within one to three days, at which point we start receiving recurring fees.

For our Bureau solutions, we typically charge recurring fees on a per-process basis. Typical processes include the customer’s payroll runs, year-end tax packages, and delivery of customers’ remittance advices or checks. In addition to customers who use our payroll services, certain customers use our tax filing services on a stand-alone basis. Our outsourced human resource solutions are tailored to meet the needs of individual customers, and entail our contracting to perform many of the duties of a customer’s human resources department, including payroll processing, time and labor management, performance management, and recruiting. We also perform individual services for customers, such as check printing, wage attachment and disbursement, and ACA management.

Cost*Excluding the 2021 acquisitions of RevenueAscender and ADAM HCM

Cost28 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

COVID-19 Pandemic

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 to be a pandemic. The global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has continued to create significant global volatility, uncertainty, and economic disruption. We have experienced and may continue to experience curtailed customer demand, primarily as a result of declining employment levels at our customers in certain sectors, such as retail and hospitality, as well as lower customer utilization of professional services, due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the federal funds rate cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve and the overnight rate target by the Bank of Canada have had negative effects on our float revenue. The broader implications of the pandemic on our results of operations and overall financial performance continue to generate uncertainty. Please refer to the “Results of Operations” section below for further discussion of the financial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, and to Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors for further discussion of the potential impact of the pandemic on our business.

How We Assess Our Performance

In assessing our performance, we consider a variety of performance indicators in addition to revenue consistsand net income (loss). Set forth below is a description of costsour key performance measures.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Live Dayforce customers (a)

 

 

5,434

 

 

 

4,906

 

 

 

4,363

 

Cloud annualized recurring revenue (ARR) (a,b,d) (in millions)

 

$

779.8

 

 

$

617.9

 

 

$

582.0

 

Annual Cloud revenue retention rate (a,b,d)

 

 

96.8

%

 

 

95.8

%

 

 

96.3

%

Dayforce recurring revenue per customer (c,d)

 

$

108,631

 

 

$

98,655

 

 

$

86,615

 

Adjusted EBITDA (d) (in millions)

 

$

162.5

 

 

$

159.0

 

 

$

184.6

 

Adjusted EBITDA margin (d)

 

 

15.9

%

 

 

18.9

%

 

 

22.4

%

(a)
Excluding the 2021 acquisitions of Ascender and ADAM HCM.
(b)
Annual Cloud revenue retention rate and Cloud ARR are calculated on an annual basis, and the disclosure reflects data as of the most recent fiscal year end. Please see below for further explanation.
(c)
Excluding float revenue, the impact of lower employment levels due to deliver our solutions. Mostthe COVID-19 pandemic, Ascender and ADAM HCM revenue, and on a constant currency basis.
(d)
This is a Non-GAAP financial measure. For Non-GAAP financial measures with a directly comparable financial measure, a reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP financial measure has been provided in the “Non-GAAP Measures” section. An explanation of these costs are recognizedmeasures is included below.

29 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Live Dayforce Customers

We use the number of live Dayforce customers as incurred. Some costsan indicator of future revenue are recognizedand the overall performance of the business and to assess the performance of our implementation services. As shown in the period that a service is soldtable below, the number of customers live on Dayforce has increased from 482 as of December 31, 2012 to 5,434 as of December 31, 2021*. For 2021, our 5,434 live Dayforce customers represented approximately 5.1 million active global users*.

We market Dayforce to customers of all sizes, including small (under 500 employees), major (500 to 5,999 employees), and delivered. Other costsenterprise (6,000 or more employees). For 2021, small businesses accounted for 10% of revenue are recognized over the periodtotal number of use oractive global users, major businesses accounted for 49% of the total number of active global users, and enterprise businesses accounted for 41% of the total number of active global users*. In 2021, we continued to grow our global customer base, particularly in proportionthe Enterprise market, which aligns with our strategic growth lever to expand within this segment. In addition to the increase in the number of Enterprise customers, we are successfully selling the broader HCM suite.

The following table sets forth the number of live Dayforce customers* at the end of the years presented:

img213354928_3.jpg 

Cloud Annualized Recurring Revenue (“ARR”)

We derive the majority of our Cloud revenues from recurring fees, primarily PEPM subscription charges. We also derive recurring revenue from fees related revenue.to the rental and maintenance of clocks, charges for once-a-year services, such as year-end tax statements, and investment income on our customer funds before such funds are remitted to taxing authorities, customer employees, or other third parties (often referred to as “float revenue”). To calculate Cloud ARR, we start with recurring revenue at year end, excluding revenue from Ascender and ADAM HCM, subtract the once-a-year charges, annualize the revenue for customers live for less than a full year to reflect the revenue that would have been realized if the customer had been live for a full year, and add back the once-a-year charges. We set annual targets for Cloud ARR and monitor progress toward those targets on a quarterly basis.

The costs recognized*Excluding the 2021 acquisitions of Ascender and ADAM HCM.

30 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Annual Cloud Revenue Retention Rate

Our annual Cloud revenue retention rate measures the percentage of revenues that we retain from our existing Cloud customers. We use this retention rate as incurred consist primarilyan indicator of customer service staff costs,satisfaction and future revenues. We calculate the annual Cloud revenue retention rate as a percentage, excluding Ascender and ADAM HCM, where the numerator is the Cloud ARR for the prior year, less the Cloud ARR from lost Cloud customers during that year; and the denominator is the Cloud ARR for the prior year. Our annual Cloud revenue retention rate has been 95% or above for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019. We set annual targets for Cloud revenue retention rate and monitor progress toward those targets on a quarterly basis by reviewing known and anticipated customer technical support costs, implementation personnel costs, costslosses. Our Cloud revenue retention rate may fluctuate as a result of hosting applications, consultinga number of factors, including the mix of Cloud solutions used by customers, the level of customer satisfaction, and purchased services, delivery services,changes in the number of users live on our Cloud solutions.

Dayforce Recurring Revenue Per Customer

Our Dayforce recurring revenue per customer is an indicator of the average size of our Dayforce recurring customer. To calculate Dayforce recurring revenue per customer, we start with Dayforce recurring revenue on a constant currency basis by applying the same exchange rate to all comparable periods for the trailing twelve months and royalties. The costsexclude float revenue, the impact of lower employment levels due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and Ascender and ADAM HCM revenue. This amount is divided by the number of live Dayforce customers at the end of the trailing twelve month period, excluding Ascender and ADAM HCM. We set quarterly targets for Dayforce recurring revenue recognized overper customer and monitor progress toward those targets on a quarterly basis. Our Dayforce recurring revenue per customer may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including the periodnumber of use are depreciation and amortization, rentals of facilities and equipment, and direct and incremental costs associated with deferred implementation service revenue.

Cost of recurring services revenues primarily consists of costs to provide maintenance and technical support to ourlive Dayforce customers and the costsnumber of hostingcustomers purchasing the full HCM suite. We have not reconciled the Dayforce recurring revenue per customer because there is no directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

Constant Currency Revenue

We present revenue on a constant currency basis to assess how our applications. The costunderlying business performed, excluding the effect of recurring services revenues also includes compensationforeign currency rate fluctuations. We believe this non-GAAP financial measure is useful to management and other employee-related expenses for data center staff, payments to outside service providers, data center expenses, and networking expenses.

Cost of professional services and other revenues primarily consists of costs to provide implementation consulting services and training to our customers, as well asinvestors. We have calculated revenue on a constant currency basis by applying the cost of time clocks. Costs to provide implementation consulting services include compensation and other employee-related expenses for professional services staff, costs of subcontractors, and travel. Implementation consulting services are expected to continue to be primarily associated withaverage foreign exchange rate in effect during the implementation of our Cloud solutions.


Product development and management expense, included in cost of revenue, consists of costs related to software development activities that do not qualify for capitalization, such as development, quality assurance, testing of new technologies, and enhancements to our existing solutions that do not result in additional functionality. Product development and management expense also includes costs relatedcomparable prior period. Please refer to the managementNon-GAAP Measures” section for a reconciliation of our solutions.this Non-GAAP financial measure.

Depreciation and amortization relatedThe average U.S. dollar to costCanadian dollar foreign exchange rate was $1.25, with a daily range of revenue primarily consists of amortization of capitalized software.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expense

Selling expense includes costs related$1.20 to maintaining a direct marketing infrastructure and sales force and other direct marketing efforts, such as marketing events, advertising, telemarketing, direct mail, and trade shows. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Our sales and marketing expenses are expected to continue to be primarily associated with selling and marketing our Cloud solutions.

General and administrative expense includes costs that are not directly related to delivery of services, selling efforts, or product development and management, primarily consisting of corporate-level costs, such as administration, finance, legal, and human resources, as well as management fees payable to affiliates of our Sponsors, FNF and THLM, until termination of the management agreements upon IPO in April 2018. Also included in this category are depreciation, and amortization of other intangible assets not reflected in cost of revenue, the provision for doubtful accounts receivable, and net periodic pension costs.

Other Expense, net

Other expense, net includes the results of transactions that are not appropriately classified in another category. These items include certain foreign currency translation gains and losses resulting mainly from intercompany receivables and payables denominated in currencies other than the subsidiary’s functional currency, environmental reserve charges, and charges related to the impairment of asset values.

Income Tax Provision

Our income tax provision represents federal, state, and international taxes on our income recognized for financial statement purposes and includes the effects of temporary differences between financial statement income and income recognized for tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities as adjusted$1.29 for the expected benefitstwelve months ended December 31, 2021, compared to $1.34, with a daily range of utilizing net operating loss carryforwards. We record a valuation allowance$1.27 to reduce our deferred tax assets to reflect$1.45 for the net deferred tax assets that we believe will be realized.  In assessing the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, including historical levels of pre-tax book income, expiration of net operating losses, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, as well as current tax laws.twelve months ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2018, we continue2021, the U.S. dollar to record a full valuation allowance againstCanadian dollar foreign exchange rate was $1.27.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin

We believe that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin, non-GAAP financial measures, are useful to management and investors as supplemental measures to evaluate our domestic deferred tax assetsoverall operating performance. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are components of our management incentive plan and are used by management to assess performance and to compare our operating performance to our competitors. We define EBITDA as net income or loss before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, and Adjusted EBITDA as net income or loss before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, as adjusted to exclude foreign exchange gain (loss), share-based compensation expense and related employer taxes, severance charges, restructuring consulting fees, and certain other non-recurring items. Adjusted EBITDA margin is determined by calculating the percentage that Adjusted EBITDA is of total revenue. Management believes that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are helpful in highlighting management performance trends because EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin exclude the results of decisions that are not offset byoutside the reversal of deferred tax liabilities. In the future, if it is determined that we no longer have a requirement to record a valuation allowance against all or a portionnormal course of our deferred tax assets,business operations. Please refer to the releaseResults of Operations” section below for a discussion of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin.

31 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Recent Events

Acquisitions

On September 13, 2019, we completed the purchase of 100% of the valuation allowance would haveissued and outstanding shares of Lusworth Holding Pty Ltd. (“RITEQ”) for $20.1 million. RITEQ is an Australian-based workforce management solutions provider, with operations within Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.

On May 29, 2020, we completed the purchase of 100% of the outstanding shares of Excelity Global Solutions Pte. Ltd. (“Excelity”) for $77.2 million. Excelity is a positive impacthuman capital management service provider in the APJ region.

On March 1, 2021, we completed the purchase of 100% of the outstanding shares of Ascender HCM Pty Limited (“Ascender”) for $359.6 million. Ascender is a payroll and HR solutions provider in the APJ region.

On April 30, 2021, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of O5 Systems, Inc. dba Ideal (“Ideal”) for $41.4 million. Ideal is a talent intelligence software provider based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

On October 4, 2021, we completed the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities of DataFuzion HCM, Inc. (“DataFuzion”), for $12.5 million in cash consideration and future contingent consideration payments. DataFuzion designs, implements, and supports customer specific data solutions that integrate HCM and ERP systems on our income tax provision.their FUZE platform.

On December 22, 2017,3, 2021, we completed the Tax Cutacquisition of 100% of the outstanding interests in ATI ROW, LLC and Jobs Act legislation (the “Tax Act”ADAM HCM MEXICO, S. de R.L. de C.V. (collectively, "ADAM HCM") for $34.3 million. ADAM HCM is a payroll and HCM company in Latin America.

Financing and Other

In March 2021, we issued $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026. In connection with the pricing of the Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into capped call transactions with the option counterparties.

On December 15, 2021, we sold our St. Petersburg, Florida facility for $40 million, resulting in a gain on the sale of $19.1 million, which was enacted. The Tax Act amendedrecognized in the Code to reduce tax ratesconsolidated statements of operations within selling, general, and to modify policies, credits, and deductions for businesses. For businesses, the Tax Act reduced the corporate federal tax rate from a maximumadministrative expense.

32 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of 35% to a flat 21% rate.Contents


Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 20182021 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 20172020

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the periods presented.presented:

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

Increase/
(Decrease)

 

 

% of Revenue

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Amount

 

 

%

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud

 

$

712.9

 

 

$

579.7

 

 

$

133.2

 

 

 

23.0

%

 

 

69.6

%

 

 

68.8

%

Bureau

 

 

137.8

 

 

 

110.5

 

 

 

27.3

 

 

 

24.7

%

 

 

13.5

%

 

 

13.1

%

Total recurring

 

 

850.7

 

 

 

690.2

 

 

 

160.5

 

 

 

23.3

%

 

 

83.1

%

 

 

81.9

%

Professional services and other

 

 

173.5

 

 

 

152.3

 

 

 

21.2

 

 

 

13.9

%

 

 

16.9

%

 

 

18.1

%

Total revenue

 

 

1,024.2

 

 

 

842.5

 

 

 

181.7

 

 

 

21.6

%

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud

 

 

197.7

 

 

 

166.9

 

 

 

30.8

 

 

 

18.5

%

 

 

19.3

%

 

 

19.8

%

Bureau

 

 

64.7

 

 

 

46.4

 

 

 

18.3

 

 

 

39.4

%

 

 

6.3

%

 

 

5.5

%

Total recurring

 

 

262.4

 

 

 

213.3

 

 

 

49.1

 

 

 

23.0

%

 

 

25.6

%

 

 

25.3

%

Professional services and other

 

 

194.6

 

 

 

163.7

 

 

 

30.9

 

 

 

18.9

%

 

 

19.0

%

 

 

19.4

%

Product development and management

 

 

134.0

 

 

 

83.7

 

 

 

50.3

 

 

 

60.1

%

 

 

13.1

%

 

 

9.9

%

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

50.9

 

 

 

40.5

 

 

 

10.4

 

 

 

25.7

%

 

 

5.0

%

 

 

4.8

%

Total cost of revenue

 

 

641.9

 

 

 

501.2

 

 

 

140.7

 

 

 

28.1

%

 

 

62.7

%

 

 

59.5

%

Gross profit

 

 

382.3

 

 

 

341.3

 

 

 

41.0

 

 

 

12.0

%

 

 

37.3

%

 

 

40.5

%

Selling, general, and administrative

 

 

417.8

 

 

 

333.5

 

 

 

84.3

 

 

 

25.3

%

 

 

40.8

%

 

 

39.6

%

Operating profit

 

 

(35.5

)

 

 

7.8

 

 

 

(43.3

)

 

 

(555.1

)%

 

 

(3.5

)%

 

 

0.9

%

Interest expense, net

 

 

35.9

 

 

 

25.1

 

 

 

10.8

 

 

 

43.0

%

 

 

3.5

%

 

 

3.0

%

Other expense, net

 

 

18.9

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

16.2

 

 

 

600.0

%

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

0.3

%

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(90.3

)

 

 

(20.0

)

 

 

(70.3

)

 

 

(351.5

)%

 

 

(8.8

)%

 

 

(2.4

)%

Income tax benefit

 

 

(14.9

)

 

 

(16.0

)

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

6.9

%

 

 

(1.4

)%

 

 

(1.9

)%

Net loss

 

 

(75.4

)

 

 

(4.0

)

 

 

(71.4

)

 

 

(1785.0

)%

 

 

(7.4

)%

 

 

(0.5

)%

Net profit margin (a)

 

 

(7.4

)%

 

 

(0.5

)%

 

 

(6.9

)%

 

 

(1450.6

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA (b)

 

$

162.5

 

 

$

159.0

 

 

$

3.5

 

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

15.9

%

 

 

18.9

%

Adjusted EBITDA margin (b)

 

 

15.9

%

 

 

18.9

%

 

 

(3.0

)%

 

 

(15.9

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

Increase/

(Decrease)

 

 

% of Revenue

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Amount

 

 

%

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud

 

$

443.1

 

 

$

336.2

 

 

$

106.9

 

 

 

31.8

%

 

 

59.4

%

 

 

50.1

%

Bureau

 

 

209.4

 

 

 

262.3

 

 

 

(52.9

)

 

 

(20.2

)%

 

 

28.1

%

 

 

39.1

%

Total recurring services

 

 

652.5

 

 

 

598.5

 

 

 

54.0

 

 

 

9.0

%

 

 

87.4

%

 

 

89.2

%

Professional services and other

 

 

93.9

 

 

 

72.3

 

 

 

21.6

 

 

 

29.9

%

 

 

12.6

%

 

 

10.8

%

Total revenue

 

 

746.4

 

 

 

670.8

 

 

 

75.6

 

 

 

11.3

%

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud

 

 

141.1

 

 

 

125.1

 

 

 

16.0

 

 

 

12.8

%

 

 

18.9

%

 

 

18.6

%

Bureau

 

 

59.2

 

 

 

71.7

 

 

 

(12.5

)

 

 

(17.4

)%

 

 

7.9

%

 

 

10.7

%

Total recurring services

 

 

200.3

 

 

 

196.8

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

26.8

%

 

 

29.3

%

Professional services and other

 

 

132.2

 

 

 

135.8

 

 

 

(3.6

)

 

 

(2.7

)%

 

 

17.7

%

 

 

20.2

%

Product development and management

 

 

59.0

 

 

 

43.6

 

 

 

15.4

 

 

 

35.3

%

 

 

7.9

%

 

 

6.5

%

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

34.3

 

 

 

31.3

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

9.6

%

 

 

4.6

%

 

 

4.7

%

Total cost of revenue

 

 

425.8

 

 

 

407.5

 

 

 

18.3

 

 

 

4.5

%

 

 

57.0

%

 

 

60.7

%

Gross profit

 

 

320.6

 

 

 

263.3

 

 

 

57.3

 

 

 

21.8

%

 

 

43.0

%

 

 

39.3

%

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative

 

 

270.7

 

 

 

223.0

 

��

 

47.7

 

 

 

21.4

%

 

 

36.3

%

 

 

33.2

%

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

(10.2

)

 

 

(139.7

)%

 

 

(0.4

)%

 

 

1.1

%

Operating profit

 

 

52.8

 

 

 

33.0

 

 

 

19.8

 

 

 

60.0

%

 

 

7.1

%

 

 

4.9

%

Interest expense, net

 

 

83.2

 

 

 

87.1

 

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

(4.5

)%

 

 

11.1

%

 

 

13.0

%

Loss from continuing operations before

   income taxes

 

 

(30.4

)

 

 

(54.1

)

 

 

23.7

 

 

 

43.8

%

 

 

(4.1

)%

 

 

(8.1

)%

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

(49.6

)

 

 

57.3

 

 

 

115.5

%

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

(7.4

)%

Loss from continuing operations

 

 

(38.1

)

 

 

(4.5

)

 

 

(33.6

)

 

 

(746.7

)%

 

 

(5.1

)%

 

 

(0.7

)%

Loss from discontinued operations

 

 

(25.8

)

 

 

(6.0

)

 

 

(19.8

)

 

 

(330.0

)%

 

 

(3.5

)%

 

 

(0.9

)%

Net loss

 

 

(63.9

)

 

 

(10.5

)

 

 

(53.4

)

 

 

(508.6

)%

 

 

(8.6

)%

 

 

(1.6

)%

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling

   interest

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

61.5

%

 

 

(0.1

)%

 

 

(0.2

)%

Net loss attributable to Ceridian

 

$

(63.4

)

 

$

(9.2

)

 

$

(54.2

)

 

 

(589.1

)%

 

 

(8.5

)%

 

 

(1.4

)%

Adjusted EBITDA (a)

 

$

157.1

 

 

$

117.8

 

 

$

39.3

 

 

 

33.4

%

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

17.6

%

(a)
Net profit margin is determined by calculating the percentage that net (loss) income is of total revenue.
(b)
For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, please refer to the “Non-GAAP Measures” section.

33 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K

(a)

For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to operating profit, please see “Non-GAAP Measures.”



Table of Contents

Revenue. The following table sets forth certain information regarding our consolidated revenues for periods presented:

 

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

Percentage change in revenue as reported

 

Impact of
changes in
foreign
currency (a)

 

Percentage change in revenue on a constant currency basis (a)

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

2021 vs. 2020

 

 

 

2021 vs. 2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dayforce recurring, excluding float

 

$

          596.9

 

$

          463.1

 

28.9%

 

1.8%

 

27.1%

Dayforce float

 

 

            29.7

 

 

            37.1

 

(19.9)%

 

1.7%

 

(21.6)%

Total Dayforce recurring

 

 

          626.6

 

 

          500.2

 

25.3%

 

1.8%

 

23.5%

Powerpay recurring, excluding float

 

 

            78.2

 

 

            70.8

 

10.5%

 

7.0%

 

3.5%

Powerpay float

 

 

              8.1

 

 

              8.7

 

(6.9)%

 

6.9%

 

(13.8)%

Total Powerpay recurring

 

 

            86.3

 

 

            79.5

 

8.6%

 

7.0%

 

1.6%

Total Cloud recurring

 

 

          712.9

 

 

          579.7

 

23.0%

 

2.5%

 

20.5%

Dayforce professional services and other

 

 

          159.3

 

 

          148.6

 

7.2%

 

2.1%

 

5.1%

Powerpay professional services and other

 

 

              0.9

 

 

              1.1

 

(18.2)%

 

(—)%

 

(18.2)%

Total Cloud professional services and other

 

 

          160.2

 

 

          149.7

 

7.0%

 

2.1%

 

4.9%

Total Cloud revenue

 

 

          873.1

 

 

          729.4

 

19.7%

 

2.4%

 

17.3%

Bureau recurring, excluding float

 

 

          134.5

 

 

          104.0

 

29.3%

 

1.4%

 

27.9%

Bureau float

 

 

              3.3

 

 

              6.5

 

(49.2)%

 

(—)%

 

(49.2)%

Total Bureau recurring

 

 

          137.8

 

 

          110.5

 

24.7%

 

1.4%

 

23.3%

Bureau professional services and other

 

 

            13.3

 

 

              2.6

 

411.5%

 

(11.6)%

 

423.1%

Total Bureau revenue

 

 

          151.1

 

 

          113.1

 

33.6%

 

1.1%

 

32.5%

Total revenue

 

$

       1,024.2

 

$

          842.5

 

21.6%

 

2.2%

 

19.4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dayforce

 

$

          785.9

 

$

          648.8

 

21.1%

 

1.8%

 

19.3%

Powerpay

 

 

            87.2

 

 

            80.6

 

8.2%

 

6.8%

 

1.4%

Total Cloud revenue

 

$

          873.1

 

$

          729.4

 

19.7%

 

2.4%

 

17.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dayforce, excluding float

 

$

          756.2

 

$

          611.7

 

23.6%

 

1.8%

 

21.8%

Powerpay, excluding float

 

 

            79.1

 

 

            71.9

 

10.0%

 

6.8%

 

3.2%

Cloud float

 

 

            37.8

 

 

            45.8

 

(17.5)%

 

2.6%

 

(20.1)%

Total Cloud revenue

 

$

          873.1

 

 

          729.4

 

19.7%

 

2.4%

 

17.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud recurring, excluding float

 

$

          675.1

 

$

          533.9

 

26.4%

 

2.4%

 

24.0%

Bureau recurring, excluding float

 

 

          134.5

 

 

          104.0

 

29.3%

 

1.4%

 

27.9%

Total recurring, excluding float

 

 

          809.6

 

 

          637.9

 

26.9%

 

2.3%

 

24.6%

Total revenue, excluding float

 

$

          983.1

 

$

          790.2

 

24.4%

 

2.2%

 

22.2%

(a)
Please refer to “Non-GAAP Measures” section for additional information on our constant currency revenue, a non-GAAP financial measure.

34 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an adverse impact on our revenue streams during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared with2021, primarily in the form of lower employment levels at our customers, lower float revenue resulting from reductions in the U.S. Federal Reserve federal funds rate and the Bank of Canada overnight rate target, lower average float balances for our customer funds, and lower demand for professional services, among other effects. For the year ended December 31, 2017. 2021, we estimate the impact of lower employment levels at our customers was an approximately $21 million reduction in our revenue, of which approximately $17 million was related to Dayforce and approximately $4 million was related to Powerpay.

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

Growth rate

year-over-

year

 

 

Impact of

changes in

foreign

currency(a)

 

 

Growth rate

on a constant

currency

basis (a)

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018 vs. 2017

 

 

 

 

 

2018 vs. 2017

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

443.1

 

 

$

336.2

 

 

 

31.8

%

 

 

(0.2

)%

 

 

32.0

%

Professional services and other

 

 

91.2

 

 

 

68.1

 

 

 

33.9

%

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

33.4

%

Total Cloud revenue

 

 

534.3

 

 

 

404.3

 

 

 

32.2

%

 

 

(0.1

)%

 

 

32.3

%

Bureau

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

 

209.4

 

 

 

262.3

 

 

 

(20.2

)%

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

(20.3

)%

Professional services and other

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

(35.7

)%

 

 

(2.4

)%

 

 

(33.3

)%

Total Bureau revenue

 

 

212.1

 

 

 

266.5

 

 

 

(20.4

)%

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

(20.5

)%

Total revenue

 

$

746.4

 

 

$

670.8

 

 

 

11.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

11.3

%

(a)

We present revenue growth in a constant currency to assess how our underlying businesses performed, excluding the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations. We calculate percentage change in revenue on a constant currency basis by applying a fixed $1.30 Canadian dollar to $1.00 U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate to revenues originally booked in Canadian dollars for all applicable periods.

Total revenue increased $75.6$181.7 million, or 11.3%21.6%, to $746.4$1,024.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, compared to $670.8$842.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in Cloud revenue of $130.0$143.7 million, or 32.2%19.7%, from $404.3$729.4 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020, to $534.3$873.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The Cloud revenue increase was primarily due to an increase of $106.9$133.2 million, or 31.8%23.0%, in Cloud recurring services revenue, and $23.1$10.5 million, or 33.9%7.0%, in Cloud professional services and other revenue. TheCloud revenue growth was driven by both an increase in customers live on the Dayforce platform and an increase in recurring revenue per customer, as well as the Cloud revenue generated from acquired businesses during 2021.

Excluding float revenue and on a constant currency basis, total revenue grew 22.2% reflecting a 19.8% increase in Cloud revenue and a 37.5% increase in Bureau revenue. Excluding float revenue and on a constant currency basis, Cloud revenue growth reflected a 24.0% increase in Cloud recurring services revenue of $106.9 million was attributable to increases of $76.0 million from new customers, add-ons, and revenue uplift from migrations of Bureau customers; $22.9 million from the migration of Bureau customers; and $20.0 million from increased float revenue related to Cloud recurring services revenue, partially offset by customer attrition of $12.0 million. Thea 4.9% increase in Cloud professional services and other revenue. Excluding float revenue and on a constant currency basis, Dayforce revenue increased 21.8%, reflecting a 27.1% increase in Dayforce recurring revenue and a 5.1% increase in Dayforce professional services and other revenue. Excluding float revenue and on a constant currency basis, Powerpay revenue increased 3.2%.

Dayforce revenue grew 21.1%, and Powerpay revenue increased 8.2% in 2021 as compared to 2020. On a constant currency basis, Dayforce revenue increased 19.3%, and Powerpay revenue increased 1.4% for the year-ended December 31, 2021, compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. Powerpay is designed primarily for small market Canadian customers, which typically have fewer than 20 employees, and we believe those customers have been more adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic than larger Dayforce customers.

In addition to the increase in Cloud revenue, Bureau revenue increased by $38.0 million, or 33.6%. The increase is primarily due to Bureau revenue associated with our recent Ascender and Excelity acquisitions. The increase was partially offset by a declinereduction in Bureau revenue associated with our legacy technology of $54.4 million, or 20.4%.  There was an immaterial impact on revenue duethe North American platforms as we continue to changes in foreign currency rate fluctuations.  Please refer tosunset the table above for our revenue growth rates on a constant currency basis.  

Of the decline in Bureau revenue, approximately 58% was driven by customer attrition and approximately 42% was attributable to customer migrations to Dayforce. Excluding the impact of migrations, our annual Bureau revenue retention rate was 86.9% in 2018 and 89.7% in 2017.technology. For the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, recurring services revenue from Bureau payroll Bureau customers accounted for $161.2$103.4 million, including $70.3 million from our two recent acquisitions in APJ, and tax-only Bureau stand-alone tax recurring services revenue accounted for $48.2 million. The$34.4 million, compared to $73.0 million and $37.5 million in the prior year for payroll Bureauand stand-alone tax customers, consist of approximately 1.5 million active users, of which approximately 1.4 million are customers that we believe could be candidates for migration to Dayforce. Some of our customers are not candidates to migrate to Dayforce due to a variety of factors, including the type of functionality that they require and their system configuration. Of the approximately 1.4 million active users that we believe could be candidates for migration to Dayforce, small businesses accounted for 21% of the total number of active users, mid-sized businesses accounted for 28% of the total number of active users, and enterprise businesses accounted for 51% of the total number of active users.respectively.


CloudFloat revenue by solution. The following table presents our Cloud revenue for bothincluded in recurring and professional services and other, for both our Dayforce and Powerpay solution for the periods presented.

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

Growth rate

year-over-

year

 

 

Growth rate

on a constant

currency

basis

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018 vs. 2017

 

 

2018 vs. 2017

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dayforce

 

$

443.0

 

 

$

319.9

 

 

 

38.5

%

 

 

38.5

%

Powerpay

 

 

91.3

 

 

 

84.4

 

 

 

8.2

%

 

 

8.3

%

Total Cloud Revenue

 

$

534.3

 

 

$

404.3

 

 

 

32.2

%

 

 

32.3

%

Cloud revenue was $534.3 million for 2018, an increase of 32.2% when compared to 2017. Dayforce revenue grew 38.5%, and Powerpay revenue grew 8.2% in 2018 as compared to 2017. There was an immaterial impact on revenue due to changes in foreign currency rate fluctuations.  Please refer to the table above for our revenue growth rates on a constant currency basis.  Our new business sales to Dayforce and Powerpay customers comprised 82% of our increase in Cloud revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the remaining 18% consisted primarily of customer migration to Dayforce from our Bureau solutions. As we migrate our Bureau customers to Dayforce, we typically experience a revenue increase from such customers driven by increased product density on the Dayforce platform. This revenue increase can vary by customer, but has been 22% on average since 2016, as measured at the time of initial migration.

Float revenue. Investment income from invested customer trust funds included in revenue was $67.0$41.1 million and $46.5$52.3 million for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. Float revenue allocated to Cloud revenue was $37.8 million and $45.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The average float balance for our customer trust funds for the year ended December 31, 20182021, was $3,361.5$3,889.5 million, compared to $3,228.2$3,240.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. On a constant currency basis, the average float balance for our customer funds increased 17.4% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to year ended December 31, 2020. The average yield was 2.00%1.07% during the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase2021, a decline of 5554 basis points compared to the average yield for the year ended December 31, 2017. Based on current investment practices, an increase in market investment rates2020. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, approximately 35% of 100 basis points would increase float revenue by approximately $17 million over the twelve months following a rate increase. In addition to interest rate risks, we also have exposure to risks associated with changes in laws and regulations that may affect customer fund balances. For example, a change in regulations, either reducing the amount of taxes to be withheld or allowing less time to remit taxes to government authorities, would reduce our average float balance consisted of customer trust fund balances and float revenue. There are no incremental costsfunds outside of revenue associated with increases or declines in float revenue.the US., primarily our Canadian customers.

Cost of revenue. Total cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, was $425.8$641.9 million, an increase of $18.3$140.7 million, or 4.5%28.1%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.  Of the total $18.3 million increase, $2.1 million was attributable to IPO-related share-based compensation expense.  Excluding IPO-related items, cost of revenue increased $16.2 million.  

2020. Recurring services cost of revenue increased by $3.5$49.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, primarily due to additional costs incurredrelated to global expansion, including Ascender and Excelity costs, which are primarily classified as Bureau. Additionally, the increase is due to costs to support the growing Dayforce customer base, partially offset by reductions in costs to support our Bureau customers.

base. The reductionincrease in cost of revenue for professional services and other of $3.6$30.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, was primarily due to productivity improvements in implementingcosts incurred to take new customers.customers live.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, we are required to capitalize certain software development costs. Please refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for further discussion of our accounting policy for internally developed software costs. Costs related to software development activities that do not qualify for capitalization, such as development, quality assurance, testing of new technologies, enhancements to our existing solutions that do not result in additional functionality, and costs related to the management of our solutions are presented as product development and management expense. The increase in productProduct development and management expense of $15.4increased $50.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017,2020. The increase reflects increases in Dayforcepersonnel costs as well as share-based compensation. Excluding the impact of share-based compensation and related employer taxes, and severance expense, product development efforts.and management expense would have increased by $41.9 million. This increase reflects additional personnel costs as we work to build out the Dayforce Wallet and our international offerings. For the years ended December 31, 2018,2021, and 2017,2020, our investment in software development was $54.9$131.7 million and $45.0$78.3 million,

35 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

respectively, consisting of $29.6$81.1 million and $19.0$39.6 million of research and development expense, which is included within product development and management expense, and $25.3$50.6 million and $26.0$38.7 million of capitalized software development, respectively. Please refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for further discussion of our accounting policy for capitalizing internally developed software costs.


Depreciation and amortization expense associated with cost of revenue increased by $3.0$10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, as we continue to capitalize Dayforce related and other development costs and subsequently amortize those costs.

Gross profit and gross margin. Total gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2021, increased by $41.0 million, or 12.0%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. The $41.0 million increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to the $133.2 million increase in Cloud recurring revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to the year ended December 31, 2020.

The following table below presents total gross margin and solution gross margins for the periods presented:

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Total gross margin

 

 

43.0

%

 

 

39.3

%

 

37.3

%

 

40.5

%

Gross margin by solution:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud recurring services

 

 

68.2

%

 

 

62.8

%

Bureau recurring services

 

 

71.7

%

 

 

72.7

%

Cloud recurring

 

72.3

%

 

71.2

%

Bureau recurring

 

53.0

%

 

58.0

%

Professional services and other

 

 

(40.8

)%

 

 

(87.8

)%

 

(12.2

)%

 

(7.5

)%

Total gross margin is defined as total gross profit as a percentage of total revenue, inclusive of product development and management costs as well as depreciation and amortization associated with cost of revenue. Gross margin for each solution in the table above is defined as total revenue less cost of revenue for the applicable solution as a percentage of total revenue for that related solution, exclusive of any product development and management or depreciation and amortization cost allocations.

The overall 11.3% increase in revenue outpaced the 4.5% increase in cost of revenue, and gross profit increased by $57.3 million, or 21.8%, as we continued to leverage our investment in people and processes to realize economies of scale.

Cloud recurring services gross margin was 68.2%72.3% for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, compared to 62.8%71.2% for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. Excluding float revenue, Cloud recurring gross margin was 70.7% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 68.7% for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in Cloud recurring services gross margin reflects an increase in the proportion of Dayforce customers live for more than two years, which increased from 59%76% as of December 31, 20172020 to 63%80% as of December 31, 2018,2021, and was also attributable to consistent configuration of new customers, whichthat has enabled us to realize economies of scale in hosting and customer support. Bureau recurring gross margin declined from 58.0% for the year ended December 31, 2020, to 53.0% for the year ended December 31, 2021 reflecting lower associated float revenue and a higher proportion of customer support costs to support the end-of-life process of our legacy Bureau payroll services, as well as lower margins on acquired Bureau services for Excelity and hosting costs.Ascender. Professional services and other gross margin was (40.8)(12.2)% for the year ended December 31, 2018, improving2021, declining from (87.8)(7.5)% for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, reflecting an increase in profitable post go-live professional services and productivity improvements in implementingadditional costs incurred to take new customers live as well as expansion of our capabilities to serve international customers.

Selling, general, and administrative expense. Selling, general, and administrative expense increased $47.7$84.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. Of2020. Excluding the total $47.7 million increase, $24.5 million was attributable to transaction expenses associated with our IPO, debt refinancing, and secondary offering, including $11.3 million in sponsor management termination fees, $6.0 million in IPO-relatedimpact of share-based compensation and related employer taxes, severance expense, $3.7 million inand certain other IPO transactions costs, and $3.5 million in restructuring consulting expenses. Excluding transaction-relatednon-recurring items, selling, general, and administrative expense increased $23.2 million, primarily due to sales and marketing expense, which increased by $13.4 million. We continue to invest in our sales and marketing efforts, as we drive growth in our Cloud solutions, particularly in Dayforce.  The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses also reflected increases in employee related costs and increased costs associated with being a public company.

Other (income) expense, net. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we incurred $2.9 million of other income, net, compared to $7.3 million of other expense, net, for the year ended December 31, 2017. The other (income) expense, net, for the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, was primarily related to remeasurement gains and losses an intercompany payable denominated in a foreign currency, which was repaid in the second quarter of 2018.

Operating profit. We realized operating profit of $52.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to an operating profit of $33.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Excluding the impact of $24.5 million in transaction costs within selling, general, and administrative expense, and $2.1 million in other increased share-based compensation expense related to the IPO within cost of revenue, operating profit would have been $79.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.increased $85.6 million. This $46.4 million increase was primarily due to a $75.6 million increase in revenue and gross margin improvement.


Interest expense, net. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2018, was $83.2 million, compared to $87.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. This reduction was primarily due to the refinancing of our debt, which resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $30.6 million upon the extinguishment of the Senior Notes in April 2018, representing seven fewer months of interest on the Senior Notes as compared to the prior year, partially offset by a loss on extinguishment of debt of $25.7 million. As of December 31, 2018, a 100 point basis increase in the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rates would result in an approximately $7 million increase in our interest expense over the ensuring twelve-month period. Please refer to Note 9, “Debt,” for additional information.

Income tax expense. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we had income tax expense of $7.7 million, compared to income tax benefit of $49.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The $57.3 million increase in tax expense is primarily attributable to the $59.4 million tax benefit recorded during the year ended December 31, 2017, reflecting the revaluation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities upon the initial implementation of the Tax Act.  

Loss from discontinued operations. As a result of the LifeWorks Disposition, the financial results of the LifeWorks business have been included within discontinued operations for all periods presented. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we had a loss from discontinued operations of $25.8 million, compared to $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2018, is primarily related to income tax expense incurred as a result of the LifeWorks Disposition.

Net loss attributable to Ceridian. Net loss attributable to Ceridian was $63.4 for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to $52.3 million of expenses incurred related to our IPO, debt refinancing, and secondary offering transactions, partially offset by an increase in gross profit. Net loss attributable to Ceridian was $9.2 for the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to a tax benefit of approximately $59.4 million related to the 2017 tax reform legislation. Please refer to the “Our History” section above for additional information on the financial statement impacts of our IPO, debt refinancing, and secondary offering transactions.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased by $39.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, and Adjusted EBITDA margin increased to 21.0% in 2018 from 17.6% in 2017.


Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2016

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the periods presented.

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

Increase/

(Decrease)

 

 

% of Revenue

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Amount

 

 

%

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud

 

$

336.2

 

 

$

239.5

 

 

$

96.7

 

 

 

40.4

%

 

 

50.1

%

 

 

38.4

%

Bureau

 

 

262.3

 

 

 

319.0

 

 

 

(56.7

)

 

 

(17.8

)%

 

 

39.1

%

 

 

51.2

%

Total recurring services

 

 

598.5

 

 

 

558.5

 

 

 

40.0

 

 

 

7.2

%

 

 

89.2

%

 

 

89.6

%

Professional services and other

 

 

72.3

 

 

 

64.9

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

11.4

%

 

 

10.8

%

 

 

10.4

%

Total revenue

 

 

670.8

 

 

 

623.4

 

 

 

47.4

 

 

 

7.6

%

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

100.0

%

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud

 

 

125.1

 

 

 

86.2

 

 

 

38.9

 

 

 

45.1

%

 

 

18.6

%

 

 

13.8

%

Bureau

 

 

71.7

 

 

 

128.2

 

 

 

(56.5

)

 

 

(44.1

)%

 

 

10.7

%

 

 

20.6

%

Total recurring services

 

 

196.8

 

 

 

214.4

 

 

 

(17.6

)

 

 

(8.2

)%

 

 

29.3

%

 

 

34.4

%

Professional services and other

 

 

135.8

 

 

 

115.6

 

 

 

20.2

 

 

 

17.5

%

 

 

20.2

%

 

 

18.5

%

Product development and management

 

 

43.6

 

 

 

43.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.7

%

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

6.9

%

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

31.3

 

 

 

23.1

 

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

35.5

%

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

3.7

%

Total cost of revenue

 

 

407.5

 

 

 

396.4

 

 

 

11.1

 

 

 

2.8

%

 

 

60.7

%

 

 

63.6

%

Gross profit

 

 

263.3

 

 

 

227.0

 

 

 

36.3

 

 

 

16.0

%

 

 

39.3

%

 

 

36.4

%

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative

 

 

223.0

 

 

 

225.3

 

 

 

(2.3

)

 

 

(1.0

)%

 

 

33.2

%

 

 

36.1

%

Other expense, net

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

12.9

 

 

 

(5.6

)

 

 

(43.4

)%

 

 

1.1

%

 

 

2.1

%

Operating profit (loss)

 

 

33.0

 

 

 

(11.2

)

 

 

44.2

 

 

 

394.6

%

 

 

4.9

%

 

 

(1.8

)%

Interest expense, net

 

 

87.1

 

 

 

87.4

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.3

)%

 

 

13.0

%

 

 

14.0

%

Loss from continuing operations before

   income taxes

 

 

(54.1

)

 

 

(98.6

)

 

 

44.5

 

 

 

45.1

%

 

 

(8.1

)%

 

 

(15.8

)%

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(49.6

)

 

 

6.7

 

 

 

(56.3

)

 

 

(840.3

)%

 

 

(7.4

)%

 

 

1.1

%

Loss from continuing operations

 

 

(4.5

)

 

 

(105.3

)

 

 

100.8

 

 

 

95.7

%

 

 

(0.7

)%

 

 

(16.9

)%

(Loss) income from discontinued operations

 

 

(6.0

)

 

 

12.5

 

 

 

(18.5

)

 

 

(148.0

)%

 

 

(0.9

)%

 

 

2.0

%

Net loss

 

 

(10.5

)

 

 

(92.8

)

 

 

82.3

 

 

 

88.7

%

 

 

(1.6

)%

 

 

(14.9

)%

Net (loss) income attributable to

   noncontrolling interest

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

(1400.0

)%

 

 

(0.2

)%

 

 

0.0

%

Net loss attributable to Ceridian

 

$

(9.2

)

 

$

(92.9

)

 

$

83.7

 

 

 

90.1

%

 

 

(1.4

)%

 

 

(14.9

)%

Adjusted EBITDA (a)

 

$

117.8

 

 

$

85.5

 

 

$

32.3

 

 

 

37.8

%

 

 

17.6

%

 

 

13.7

%

(a)

For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to operating profit, please see “Non-GAAP Measures.”


Revenue. The following table sets forth certain information regarding our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared with the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

Growth rate

year-over-

year

 

 

Impact of

changes in

foreign

currency(a)

 

 

Growth rate

on a constant

currency

basis (a)

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2017 vs. 2016

 

 

 

 

 

2017 vs. 2016

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

336.2

 

 

$

239.5

 

 

 

40.4

%

 

 

1.4

%

 

 

39.0

%

Professional services and other

 

 

68.1

 

 

 

58.3

 

 

 

16.8

%

 

 

0.9

%

 

 

15.9

%

Total Cloud revenue

 

 

404.3

 

 

 

297.8

 

 

 

35.8

%

 

 

1.3

%

 

 

34.5

%

Bureau

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

 

262.3

 

 

 

319.0

 

 

 

(17.8

)%

 

 

0.4

%

 

 

(18.2

)%

Professional services and other

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

(36.4

)%

 

 

 

 

 

(36.4

)%

Total Bureau revenue

 

 

266.5

 

 

 

325.6

 

 

 

(18.2

)%

 

 

0.4

%

 

 

(18.6

)%

Total revenue

 

$

670.8

 

 

$

623.4

 

 

 

7.6

%

 

 

0.8

%

 

 

6.8

%

(a)

We present revenue growth in a constant currency to assess how our underlying businesses performed excluding the effect of foreign currency rate fluctuations. We calculate percentage change in revenue on a constant currency basis by applying a fixed $1.30 Canadian dollar to $1.00 U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate to revenues originally booked in Canadian dollars for all applicable periods.

Total revenue increased $47.4 million, or 7.6%, to $670.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $623.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in Cloud revenue of $106.5 million, or 35.8%, from $297.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $404.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Cloud revenue increase was driven by anadjusted increase of $96.7 million, or 40.4%, in Cloud recurring services revenue, and $9.8 million, or 16.8%, in Cloud professional services and other revenue. The increase in Cloud recurring services revenue of $96.7$85.6 million was due to $68.0a $48.5 million from new customers, add-ons, and revenue uplift from migrations of Bureau customers; $28.1 million from the migration of Bureau customers; $10.0 million from increased float revenue related to Cloud recurring services revenue; partially offset by customer losses of $9.4 million. The increase in Cloud revenue was partially offset by a decline in Bureau recurring services revenue of $56.7 million, or 17.8%.

On a constant currency basis, total revenue grew 6.8%. This adjusted revenue growth was driven by an increase of 34.5% in Cloud revenue, partially offset by a decline of 18.6% in Bureau revenue. On a constant currency basis, Cloud revenue growth for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, was driven by Cloud recurring services revenue, which increased by 39.0%, and professional services and other revenue, which increased by 15.9%, as we continued to sign and to activate new customers.

Of the decline in Bureau revenue, approximately 50% was driven by customer attrition and approximately 50% was driven by customer migrations to Dayforce. Excluding the impact of migrations, our annual Bureau revenue retention rate was 89.7% in 2017 and 87.4% in 2016.  For the year ended December 31, 2017, recurring services revenue from payroll Bureau customers accounted for $210.2 million and tax-only Bureau recurring services revenue accounted for $52.1 million. The payroll Bureau customers consist of approximately 1.9 million active users, of which approximately 1.7 million of these active users are with customers that we believe could be candidates for migration to Dayforce. Some of our customers are not candidates to migrate to Dayforce due to a variety of factors, including the type of functionality that they require and their system configuration. Of the approximately 1.7 million active users, small businesses accounted for 20% of the total number of active users, mid-sized businesses accounted for 30% of the total number of active users, and enterprise businesses accounted for 50% of the total number of active users.


Cloud revenue by solution. The following table presents our Cloud revenue for both recurring and professional services and other, for both our Dayforce and Powerpay solution for the periods presented.

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

Growth rate

year-over-

year

 

 

Growth rate

on a constant

currency

basis

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2017 vs. 2016

 

 

2017 vs. 2016

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dayforce

 

$

319.9

 

 

$

219.0

 

 

 

46.1

%

 

 

45.5

%

Powerpay

 

 

84.4

 

 

 

78.8

 

 

 

7.1

%

 

 

4.6

%

Total Cloud Revenue

 

$

404.3

 

 

$

297.8

 

 

 

35.8

%

 

 

34.5

%

Cloud revenue was $404.3 million during 2017, an increase of 35.8% when compared to 2016. Dayforce revenue grew 46.1%, and Powerpay revenue grew 7.1% during 2017 as compared to 2016. Our new business sales to Dayforce customers comprised 74% of our increase in Cloud revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the remaining 26% consisted primarily of customer migration to Dayforce from our Bureau solutions.

Float revenue. Investment income from invested customer trust funds included in revenue was $46.5 million and $39.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The average float balance for our customer trust funds for the year ended December 31, 2017, was $3,228.2 million, compared to $3,260.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The yield was 1.44% during the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of 24 basis points compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition to interest rate risks, we also have exposure to risks associated with changes in laws and regulations that may affect customer fund balances. For example, a change in regulations, either reducing the amount of taxes to be withheld or allowing less time to remit taxes to government authorities, would reduce our average customer trust fund balances and float revenue. There are no incremental costs of revenue associated with increases or declines in float revenue.

Cost of revenue. Total cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017, was $407.5 million, an increase of $11.1 million, or 2.8%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.

During 2017, we changed the presentation and classification of certain expenses within our statements of operations to better facilitate comparisons with revenue and expenses of similar businesses, to better align our income statement presentation with the way management and reporting of our business has evolved internally, and to enhance our overall disclosure and understanding of the business for external users. We reallocated certain expenses between cost of recurring services revenue, cost of professional services and other revenue, and selling, general, and administrative expense. The net impact of these reallocations was to increase total cost of revenue by $3.4 million and to reduce selling, general, and administrative expense by $3.4 million. These changes in presentation and classification represent a change in estimate and have been accounted for on a prospective basis. Therefore, to facilitate the discussion in this section, the following table presents the actual reported costs and expenses as well as the costs and expenses on a pro forma basis as if the changes to allocation methodologies in 2017 had been in effect in 2016:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Pro Forma

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2016

Pro Forma

 

 

Amount

 

 

%

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

196.8

 

 

$

214.4

 

 

$

182.9

 

 

$

13.9

 

 

 

7.6

%

Professional services and other

 

 

135.8

 

 

 

115.6

 

 

 

138.7

 

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

(2.1

)%

Product development and management

 

 

43.6

 

 

 

43.3

 

 

 

46.9

 

 

 

(3.3

)

 

 

(7.0

)%

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

31.3

 

 

 

23.1

 

 

 

31.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total cost of revenue

 

$

407.5

 

 

$

396.4

 

 

$

399.8

 

 

$

7.7

 

 

 

1.9

%

Selling, general, and administrative

 

$

223.0

 

 

$

225.3

 

 

$

221.9

 

 

$

1.1

 

 

 

0.5

%


The increase in total cost of revenue for year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, included a net reallocation of $3.4 million from selling, general, and administrative expense due to a change in estimate of expense allocations. Excluding the effect of these reallocations, total cost of revenue would have increased by $7.7 million, or 1.9%.

Recurring services cost of revenue was reduced by $17.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This reduction included a reallocation of $31.5 million of costs from recurring services cost of revenue, consisting primarily of $13.4 million in technology and facilities expenses, $10.9 million in finance related expenses, and $9.3 million in corporate function expenses. Excluding the effect of these reallocations, recurring services cost of revenue would have increased by $13.9 million due to additional costs incurred to support the growing Dayforce customer base, partially offset by reductions in Bureau costs.

The increase in cost of revenue for professional services and other of $20.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, included a net reallocation of $23.1 million of costs to professional services and other cost of revenue, primarily $23.2 million of technology and facilities expenses. Excluding the effect of these reallocations, professional services and other cost of revenue would have been reduced by $2.9 million, as we achieved productivity improvements in implementing new customers.

The increase in product development and management expense of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, included the reallocation of $3.6 million of costs to product development and management, primarily $7.9 million in technology and facilities expenses, offset by $2.8 million in corporate function expenses. Excluding the effect of these reallocations, product development and management expense would have been reduced by $3.3 million, due to reductions in product management costs associated with our Bureau solution and technology expenses, partially offset by higher headcount to support the continued development of the Dayforce platform.

Depreciation and amortization expense associated with cost of revenue increased by $8.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. Excluding the effect of these reallocations of $8.2 million, depreciation and amortization expense would have been consistent with 2016.

The table below presents total gross margin and solution gross margins for the periods presented, both as presented and on a pro forma basis as if the changes to allocation methodologies of certain costs in 2017 discussed above had been in effect in 2016.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2016

Pro Forma

 

Total gross margin

 

 

39.3

%

 

 

36.4

%

 

 

35.9

%

Gross margin by solution:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud recurring services

 

 

62.8

%

 

 

64.0

%

 

 

60.2

%

Bureau recurring services

 

 

72.7

%

 

 

59.8

%

 

 

72.5

%

Professional services and other

 

 

(87.8

)%

 

 

(78.1

)%

 

 

(113.7

)%

Selling, general, and administrative expense. Selling, general, and administrative expense was reduced by $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This reduction included the reallocation of $3.4 million of costs. Excluding the effect of these reallocations, selling, general, and administrative expense would have increased by $1.1 million, reflecting increases in sales and marketing expenses and share-based compensationa $37.1 million increase in general and administrative expense, both of which are primarily driven by employee-related costs. The increase in sales and marketing expense aligns with our growth initiatives. The increase in general and administrative expense is also driven by an increase in amortization expense associated with the intangible assets recognized in relation to our recent acquisitions, partially offset by reductionsthe gain on sale of our office facility in restructuring consulting fees, severance expense, sponsor management fees and other cost reduction measures related to our declining Bureau solutions.

Other expense, net. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we incurred $7.3 million of other expense, net, compared to $12.9 million, for the year ended December 31, 2016. The other expense, net, for the year ended December 31, 2017, was primarily related to foreign currency remeasurement losses on intercompany receivables or payables denominated in foreign currencies. The other expense, net, for the year ended December 31, 2016, was primarily related to an impairment of $10.2 million to our trade name intangible asset and an increase of $5.9 million to our environmental reserve liability to reflect more stringent remediation requirements, partially offset by foreign currency remeasurement gains on intercompany receivables or payables denominated in foreign currencies.St. Peterburg, Florida. Please refer to Note 12, “Supplementary Data to Statement of Operations,”the "Non-GAAP Measures" section for further discussion.


Operating profit (loss). We realized operating profit of $33.0 million foradditional information on the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to an operating loss of $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. This $44.2 million increase was primarily due to a $47.4 million increase in revenue and gross margin improvement.excluded items.

Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, was $87.1$35.9 million, compared to $87.4$25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020. This $10.8 million increase in interest expense, net was primarily due to interest on our Convertible Senior Notes that were issued in March 2021.

Income tax (benefit) expense.36 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Other expense, net.For the yearyears ended December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, other expense, net of $18.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively, was comprised of net periodic pension expense, as well as foreign currency translation expense in 2021 compared to foreign currency translation income in 2020.

Income tax benefit. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had an income tax benefit of $49.6$14.9 million comparedand $16.0 million, respectively. The $1.1 million reduction in tax benefit was primarily due to incomea tax expenseincrease of $6.7$8.2 million attributed to the base erosion anti-abuse tax (BEAT) in the U.S., a $4.0 million increase attributed to share-based compensation, a $4.0 million increase attributed to international tax rate differences, and other increases of $4.6 million, partially offset by a $14.8 million tax benefit from current operations, and a $4.9 million tax benefit attributable to U.S. state tax. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to reflect the net deferred tax assets that we believe will be realized. As of December 31, 2021, we will continue to record a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets including some state net operating loss carryovers and tax basis intangibles.

Net loss. Net loss was $75.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2017, was primarily related to a tax benefit of approximately $59.4 million related to the 2017 tax reform legislation, of which $26.4 million was attributable to the revaluation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities and $33.0 million was attributable to the reduction in our valuation allowance.

(Loss) income from discontinued operations. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we had a loss from discontinued operations of $6.0 million,2021, compared to income from discontinued operation of $12.5$4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020. The increase in net loss from discontinued operations foris primarily due to higher share-based compensation, lower employment levels at our customers and lower float revenue income due to the yearCOVID-19 pandemic, investments in product development, selling capabilities, and business acquisitions to support our growth initiatives in 2021, partially offset by the gain of $19.1 million on the sale of our St. Petersburg, Florida facility. For the years ended December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, net profit margin was primarily related to our LifeWorks business. Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2016, was primarily attributable to proceeds of $10.7 million from our Divested Benefits Businesses, net of tax, which were sold in a series of transactions in the third quarter of 2015,(7.4)% and our United Kingdom business, which was sold in the second quarter of 2016, resulting in a gain on sale of $5.9 million.(0.5)%, respectively.

Net loss attributable to Ceridian. Net loss attributable to Ceridian improvedAdjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased by $83.7$3.5 million to $9.2$162.5 million, for the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, compared to $92.9the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to the increase in cloud recurring margin, partially offset by the increase in sales and marketing and product development and management expense as well as the reduction in float revenue. Adjusted EBITDA margin declined to 15.9% in 2021 from 18.9% in 2020. Adjusted EBITDA, excluding float revenue, increased $14.7 million to $121.4 million, for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased by $32.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016,2020. Please refer to the "Non-GAAP Measures" section for a discussion and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin increased to 17.6% in 2017 from 13.7% in 2016.and additional information on the excluded items.


Quarterly Results of Operations

The following table sets forth statements of operations data for each of the quarters presented. We have prepared the quarterly statements of operations data on a basis consistent with the audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial information reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which we consider necessary for a fair presentation of this data. This information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes. The results of historical periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for any future period.

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

 

June 30,

2018

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

September 30,

2017

 

 

June 30,

2017

 

 

March 31,

2017

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

171.7

 

 

$

157.2

 

 

$

156.6

 

 

$

167.0

 

 

$

160.3

 

 

$

145.6

 

 

$

140.8

 

 

$

151.8

 

Professional services and other

 

 

28.6

 

 

 

22.4

 

 

 

22.7

 

 

 

20.2

 

 

 

22.1

 

 

 

17.9

 

 

 

16.7

 

 

 

15.6

 

Total revenue

 

 

200.3

 

 

 

179.6

 

 

 

179.3

 

 

 

187.2

 

 

 

182.4

 

 

 

163.5

 

 

 

157.5

 

 

 

167.4

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

 

51.0

 

 

 

49.1

 

 

 

49.5

 

 

 

50.7

 

 

 

51.0

 

 

 

48.4

 

 

 

48.1

 

 

 

49.3

 

Professional services and other

 

 

33.5

 

 

 

32.5

 

 

 

33.4

 

 

 

32.8

 

 

 

33.0

 

 

 

34.8

 

 

 

34.1

 

 

 

33.9

 

Product development and management

 

 

15.7

 

 

 

14.5

 

 

 

15.1

 

 

 

13.7

 

 

 

11.8

 

 

 

11.0

 

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

10.8

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

8.7

 

 

 

8.1

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

7.6

 

 

 

7.6

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

108.8

 

 

 

104.6

 

 

 

106.5

 

 

 

105.9

 

 

 

103.9

 

 

 

102.2

 

 

 

99.8

 

 

 

101.6

 

Gross profit

 

 

91.5

 

 

 

75.0

 

 

 

72.8

 

 

 

81.3

 

 

 

78.5

 

 

 

61.3

 

 

 

57.7

 

 

 

65.8

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative

 

 

70.4

 

 

 

59.4

 

 

 

84.1

 

 

 

56.8

 

 

 

62.0

 

 

 

52.4

 

 

 

54.8

 

 

 

53.8

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.8

)

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

1.1

 

Operating profit (loss)

 

 

21.5

 

 

 

15.3

 

 

 

(11.3

)

 

 

27.3

 

 

 

16.1

 

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

10.9

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

8.8

 

 

 

8.8

 

 

 

43.4

 

 

 

22.2

 

 

 

21.8

 

 

 

21.9

 

 

 

22.0

 

 

 

21.4

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before

   income taxes

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

6.5

 

 

 

(54.7

)

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

(5.7

)

 

 

(16.8

)

 

 

(21.1

)

 

 

(10.5

)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

(53.4

)

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

1.0

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

10.8

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

(55.8

)

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

47.7

 

 

 

(17.7

)

 

 

(23.0

)

 

 

(11.5

)

(Loss) income from discontinued operations

 

 

(11.0

)

 

 

(3.0

)

 

 

(9.7

)

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

(3.6

)

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.3

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

(65.5

)

 

 

(2.6

)

 

 

44.1

 

 

 

(20.6

)

 

 

(22.8

)

 

 

(11.2

)

Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling

   interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income attributable to Ceridian

 

$

(0.2

)

 

$

4.4

 

 

$

(65.5

)

 

$

(2.1

)

 

$

45.0

 

 

$

(20.1

)

 

$

(22.9

)

 

$

(11.2

)


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity are our existing cash and equivalents, cash provided by operating activities, borrowingsavailability under our credit facilities,Revolving Credit Facility, and proceeds from debt issuance and equity offerings. As of December 31, 2018,2021, we had cash and equivalents of $217.8$367.5 million and availability under our revolving credit facility of $300.0 million. No cash amounts werethere was no amount drawn on the revolving credit facility during 2018. Our total indebtedness was $678.3 million asour Revolving Credit Facility of December 31, 2018. Please refer to Note 9, “Debt,” to our consolidated financial statements, for further information on our debt.$300 million.

Our primary liquidity needs are related to funding of general business requirements, including the payment of interest and principal on our indebtedness,debt, capital expenditures, pension contributions,product development, and product development.funding Dayforce Wallet on demand pay requests. We have made investments in businesses or acquisitions of companies, which are also liquidity needs. Our total debt balance was $1,242.5 million as of December 31, 2021. Please refer to Note 9, “Debt,” to our consolidated financial statements and “Our Indebtedness” section below for further information on our debt.

Our customer trust funds are heldOn February 26, 2021, we elected to borrow $295.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility to fund our acquisition of Ascender on March 1, 2021. We repaid the $295.0 million draw on March 5, 2021 with proceeds from the issuance of our Convertible Senior Notes. On April 2, 2020, we elected to borrow $295.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility as a precautionary measure to increase our cash position and investedto preserve financial flexibility, given the uncertainty in the global capital markets resulting from the initial onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We repaid the $295.0 million draw on December 8, 2020.

In March 2021, we issued $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026. The total net proceeds from the offering, after deducting initial purchase discounts and issuance costs, were $561.8 million. In connection with the primary objectives beingConvertible Senior Notes, we entered into capped call transactions which are expected to protectreduce the potential dilution of our common stock upon any conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes and/or offset any cash payments we could be required to make in excess of the principal balanceamount of converted Convertible Senior Notes. We used an aggregate amount of $45.0 million of the net proceeds of the Convertible Senior Notes to purchase the Capped Calls. We used the remainder of the net proceeds from the offering (i) to repay $295.0 million principal amount under the Revolving Credit Facility and pay related accrued interest and (ii) for general corporate purposes.

On February 19, 2020, we completed the first amendment to ensure adequate liquiditythe Senior Secured Credit Facility, in which the Term Debt interest rate was reduced from LIBOR plus 3.00% to meet cash flow requirements. Accordingly,LIBOR plus 2.50%. Further, the interest rate trigger under the applicable rating by Moody’s Investor Service was removed by the first amendment.

37 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

On December 15, 2021, we maintain on average approximately 46%completed the second amendment to the Senior Secured Credit Facility, in which the maturity date of customer trust funds in liquidity portfolios with maturities rangingthe Revolving Credit Facility was extended from oneApril 30, 2023 to 120 days, consisting of high-quality bank deposits, money market mutual funds, commercial paper, or collateralized short-term investments; and we maintain on average approximately 54% of customer trust funds in fixed income portfolios with maturities ranging from 120 days to 10 years, consisting of U.S. Treasury and agency securities, Canada government and provincial securities, as well as highly rated asset-backed, mortgage-backed, municipal, corporate and bank securities. To maintain sufficient liquidity in the trust to meet payment obligations, we also have financing arrangements and may pledge fixed income securities for short-term financing. The assets held in trust are intended for the specific purpose of satisfying client fund obligations and therefore are not freely available for our general business use.January 29, 2025.

We believe that our cash flow from operations, availability under our revolving credit facility,Revolving Credit Facility, and available cash and equivalents will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. Dayforce Wallet on demand pay requests are currently funded from our operating cash balances, until it is reimbursed by the customers through their normal payroll funding cycles. We evaluate the creditworthiness of each customer for the Dayforce Wallet feature. We anticipate that to the extent that we require additional liquidity, it will be funded through the issuance of equity, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, or a combination thereof. We cannot assure youprovide assurance that we will be able to obtain this additional liquidity on reasonable terms, or at all. Additionally, our liquidity and our ability to meet our obligations and to fund our capital requirements and Dayforce Wallet on demand pay requests are also dependent on our future financial performance, which is subject to general economic, financial, and other factors that are beyond our control. Accordingly, we cannot assure youprovide assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available from additional indebtedness or otherwise to meet our liquidity needs. Although we have no specific current plans to do so, ifIf we decide to pursue one or more significant acquisitions, we may incur additional debt or sell additional equity to finance such acquisitions, which would result in additional expenses or dilution.

Our customer funds are held and invested with the primary objectives being to protect the principal balance and to ensure adequate liquidity to meet cash flow requirements. Please refer to Note 5, "Customer Funds," for further discussion of these funds.

Statements of Cash Flows

Changes in cash flows due to purchases of customer trust fund marketable securities and proceeds from the sale or maturity of customer trust fund marketable securities, and the net increase (decrease) of restricted cash held to satisfy customer trust fund obligations, as well as the carrying value of customer trust fund accounts as of period end dates can vary significantly due to several factors, including the specific day of the week the period ends, which impacts the timing of funds collected from customers and payments made to satisfy customer obligations to employees, taxing authorities, and others. For example, December 31,2018was a Monday, when trust fund balances are generally lower; whereas, the last business day of 2017 was a Friday, when trust fund balances are generally higher.  The customer trust funds are fully segregated from our operating cash accounts and are evaluated and tracked separately by management. Therefore, to provide meaningful information toThe table below summarizes the readers,activity within the following discussion is regarding the netconsolidated statements of cash flows excluding customer trust funds.flows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

48.8

 

 

$

(30.2

)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

 

(711.1

)

 

 

38.8

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

407.5

 

 

 

565.3

 

Effect of exchange rate on cash and equivalents

 

 

(20.9

)

 

 

(4.0

)

Net (decrease) increase in cash, restricted cash, and equivalents

 

 

(275.7

)

 

 

569.9

 

Cash, restricted cash, and equivalents at beginning of period

 

 

2,228.5

 

 

 

1,658.6

 

Cash, restricted cash, and equivalents at end of period

 

 

1,952.8

 

 

 

2,228.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents

 

 

367.5

 

 

$

188.2

 

Restricted cash and equivalents in customer funds

 

 

1,585.3

 

 

 

2,040.3

 

Total cash, restricted cash, and equivalents

 

$

1,952.8

 

 

$

2,228.5

 

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations of $10.7was $48.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, primarily attributed to a net loss of $75.4 million offset by the net impact of adjustments for certain non-cash items of $165.2 million, including $113.4 million of non-cash share-based compensation expense, and $77.5 million of depreciation and amortization. Additionally, there were net working capital reductions of $41.0 million. The net working capital reductions included a $34.8 million increase in trade and other receivables, a $12.3 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $11.8 million decrease in working capital related to other assets and liabilities, and a $9.3 million decrease in accounts payable and other accrued expenses.

Net cash used in operating activities was $30.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily attributableattributed to operating profitnet changes in working capital that resulted in a $161.1 million reduction in cash and a net loss of $52.8$4.0 million, partially offset by a $45.0the net impact of adjustments for certain non-cash items of $134.9 million, reduction in cash as a resultincluding $65.8 million

38 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of netContents

of non-cash share-based compensation expense, $51.8 million of depreciation and amortization, and $16.8 million of lease abandonment costs. Net changes in working capital. The $45.0 million reduction in net working capital waswere primarily attributable to a $104.0 million reduction of $22.1 million in liabilities for employee compensation and benefits, primarily due to payments of accrued incentive compensation and$106.9 million in pension contributions, $32.0 million decrease in working capital related to other assets and liabilities, a $12.0 million increase in trade and other receivables, and a $15.7$6.8 million reductionincrease in liabilities for accrued interest, associated with our debt refinancing. Included within net cash flows provided by operating activities forprepaid expenses and other current assets.

Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2018, was $74.5 million in cash interest payments on our long-term debt, $18.5 million in pension payments, and $16.7 million in cash taxes,2021, net of refunds received.


Net cash used in operatinginvesting activities was $711.1 million, related to acquisition costs, net of cash acquired, of $409.5 million, net purchases of customer funds marketable securities of $275.8 million, and capital expenditures of $63.7 million. Our capital expenditures included $52.2 million for software and technology and $11.5 million for property and equipment.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash provided by investing activities was $38.8 million, related to net proceeds from continuing operationscustomer funds marketable securities of $29.4$156.9 million, partially offset by capital expenditures of $59.8 million and acquisition costs, net of cash acquired, of $58.3 million. Our capital expenditures included $41.7 million for software and technology and $18.1 million for property and equipment.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $407.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017,2021. This cash inflow was primarily attributable to operating losses of $4.5 million, net changes in working capital of $37.2 million, and a deferred tax benefit of $62.3 million, partially offset by certain non-cash items, primarily $53.8 million of depreciation and amortization and $16.1 million of share-based compensation expense. Net changes in working capital were driven by employee compensation and benefits, primarily pension contributions, accrued taxes, and prepaid expenses.

Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations of $73.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, was primarily attributable to operating losses of $105.3 million with offsetting adjustments for certain non-cash items and net changes in working capital. The adjustments for non-cash items included $53.2 million of depreciation and amortization, $12.5 million of share-based compensation expense, a $10.4 million asset impairment, and a $5.9 million adjustment to our environmental reserve liability, partially offset by $8.3 million of deferred income tax benefit. Net changes in working capital of $49.3 million were primarily driven by pension contributions exceeding pension expense.

Investing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations, excluding customer trust fund activity, was $40.2 million, including $32.2 million in capital expenditures for software and technology and $8.0 million in capital expenditures for property and equipment.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations excluding customer trust fund activity was $51.1 million, primarily related to capital expenditures, partially offset by proceeds from divestitures. Our capital expenditures included $33.1 million for software and technology and $17.5 million for property and equipment.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by investing activities from continuing operations excluding customer trust fund activity was $68.7 million, primarily related to the net proceeds from divestitures of $101.6 million, offset by capital expenditures. Our capital expenditures included $25.5 million for software and technology and $7.4 million for property and equipment.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations, excluding the change in customer trust fund obligations, was $163.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. This cash inflow is primarily attributable to the net proceeds received from our IPO and concurrent private placement of $595.0 million, a net increase in the principalissuance of our term loanConvertible Senior Notes of $23.0$561.8 million, and proceeds from the issuance of common stock upon exerciseunder share-based compensation plans of stock options of $45.8$95.4 million, partially offset by a $475.0the net decrease in our customer funds obligations of $195.7 million, payment to redeemand payments on our Senior Notes andlong-term debt refinancing costsobligations of $23.3$7.8 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations excluding the change in customer trust fund obligations was $50.7$565.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017,2020. This cash inflow was primarily relatedattributable to the fundingnet increase in our customer funds obligations of the remaining $75.2$483.6 million, and proceeds from the issuance of Senior Preferred Stock, partially offset by a $25.9common stock under share-based compensation plans of $91.7 million, payment made on our term debt.

Net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations excluding the change in customer trust fund obligation was $63.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, related to proceeds received from the issuance of Senior Preferred Stock, partially offset by payments made on our term debt.long-term debt obligations of $10.0 million.

Cash Flows from Discontinued OperationsBacklog and Seasonality

During the year ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in discontinued operations was $1.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in discontinued operations was $10.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash used in discontinued operations was $1.9 million. The cash flows from discontinued operationsBacklog is equivalent to our remaining performance obligations, which represents contracted revenue for all periodsrecurring and fixed price professional services, primarily relate to changes in working capital.

Backlog

We do not believe that any measure of backlog is a meaningful indicator of revenues that can be expected for a particular future period as the amount and timing can be influenced by multiple factors, including the timing of the completion of implementation, the accuracy and success of implementation services, provided by usthat has not yet been recognized, including deferred revenue and by third parties, the timingunbilled amounts that will be recognized as revenue in which new customers go-live, and our ability to meet service level commitments.


Seasonality

We have in the past and expect in the future to experience seasonal fluctuations in our revenues and new customer contracts with the fourth quarter historically being our strongest quarter for new customer contracts, renewals, and customer go-lives. Although the growth of our Cloud solutions and the ratable nature of our fees makes this seasonality less apparent in our overall results of operations, we expect our revenue to fluctuate quarterly and to be higher in the fourth and first quarters of each year.  Fourth quarter revenue is driven by year-end processing fees and Dayforce customer go-lives; and first quarter revenue is driven by revenue earned for printing of year-end tax packages.  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

periods. As of December 31, 2018,2021, approximately $1,118.5 million of revenue is expected to be recognized over the next three years from remaining performance obligations.

For a discussion of seasonality, please refer to Part 1, Item I, “Business” of this Form 10-K.

Our Indebtedness

Our primary liquidity needs are related to funding of general business requirements, including the payment of interest and principal on our debt, capital expenditures, product development, and funding Dayforce Wallet. From time to time, we did not have any “off-balance sheet arrangements” (as such term is definedmade investments in Item 303businesses or acquisitions of Regulation S-K).companies, which are also liquidity needs. We believe our current sources of liquidity will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that to the extent that we require additional liquidity, it will be funded through the issuance of equity, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, or a combination thereof. During 2021 and 2020, we incurred additional debt in the form of draws on our Revolving Credit Facility, which was subsequently repaid, and issuance of our Convertible Senior Notes for purposes of either (i) conserving our liquidity position during the uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic, and (ii) general corporate purposes, including acquisitions of companies.

Our IndebtednessSenior Secured Credit Facility

On April 30, 2018, Ceridianwe entered into a credit agreement pursuant to which the lenders agreed to provide Senior Secured Credit Facilities,Facility, consisting of the Senior Term LoanDebt in the original principal amount of $680.0 million and a $300.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility may, at our option, be made available in United States Dollars, Canadian Dollars, Euros and/or Pounds Sterling; up to $70.0 million may, at our option, be made available for letters of

39 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

credit and $100.0 million may, at our option, be made available for swingline loans (denominated in Canadian Dollars and/or United States Dollars).

The Senior Term LoanDebt will mature on April 30, 2025. We are required to make annual amortization payments in respect of the Senior Term LoanDebt in an amount equal to 1.00% of the original principal amount thereof, payable in equal quarterly installments of 0.25% of the original principal amount of the first lien term loan. Thedebt. On December 15, 2021, we completed the second amendment to our Senior Secured Credit Facility, which extended the maturity of the Revolving Credit Facility matures onfrom April 30, 2023 andto January 29, 2025. The Revolving Credit Facility does not require amortization payments.

Convertible Senior Notes

In March 2021, we issued $575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026. The obligationstotal net proceeds from the offering, after deducting initial purchase discounts and issuance costs, were $561.8 million. In connection with the Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into capped call transactions which are expected to reduce the potential dilution of Ceridian under the Senior Credit Facilities are secured by first priority security interests in substantially allour common stock upon any conversion of the assets of Ceridian and the guarantors, subjectConvertible Senior Notes and/or offset any cash payments we could be required to permitted liens and other exceptions. All of our subsidiaries are guarantors under the Senior Credit Facilities, subject to certain exceptions. The Senior Credit Facilities contain financial covenants and certain business covenants, including restrictions on dividend payments, which Ceridian must comply with during the termmake in excess of the agreement. Asprincipal amount of December 31, 2018, Ceridian was in full compliance with the termsconverted Notes. We used an aggregate amount of $45.0 million of the net proceeds of the Convertible Senior Credit Facilities.

Borrowings underNotes to purchase the Senior Credit Facilities bear interest at a rate per annum equal to:

1.

in the case of borrowings denominated in U.S. dollars on any day (a) at Ceridian’s election, either (i) anCapped Calls. We used the remainder of the net proceeds from the offering (i) to repay $295.0 million principal amount (not less than 1.00%) equal to the greater of (A) a base rate determined by reference to the rate of interest per annum announced by Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch (“DBNY”) as its prime rate on such day, (B) the federal funds effective rate on such date plus 1/2 of 1.00% and (C) the London interbank offered rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.00% or (ii) if available, LIBOR for U.S. dollars determined by reference to the applicable Reuters screen page two business days prior to the commencement of the interest period relevant to the subject borrowing, adjusted for certain additional costs, which may not be less than 0.00% plus (b) an applicable margin;

2.

in the case of borrowings under the Revolving Facility denominated in Canadian Dollars on any day (a) at Ceridian’s election, either (i) the rate of interest per annum quoted or established as the “prime rate” of Deutsche Bank AG Canada Branch plus an applicable margin or (ii) CDOR for Canadian dollars determined by reference to the applicable Reuters screen page on date of the commencement of the interest period relevant to the subject borrowing, adjusted for certain additional costs, which may not be less than 0.00% plus (b) an applicable margin;

3.

in the case of borrowings under the Revolving Facility denominated in Euros on any day, (a) The London interbank offered rate in Euros (“EURIBOR”) determined by reference to the applicable Reuters screen page two business days prior to the commencement of the interest period relevant to the subject borrowing, which may not be less than 0.00% plus (b) an applicable margin; or

4.

in the case of borrowings under the Revolving Facility denominated in Pounds Sterling, (a) Sterling LIBOR determined by reference to the applicable Reuters screen page one business day prior to the commencement of the interest period relevant to the subject borrowing, which may not be less than 0.00% plus (b) an applicable margin.


The applicable margin for the Senior Term Loan is (i) 3.25% per annum, in the case of LIBOR loans and (ii) 2.25% per annum, in the case of base rate loans. Such applicable margin will be reduced by 0.25% per annum if the corporate family rating of Ceridian from Moody’s is B2 or better, each such reduction being effective during the period commencing on the date of such change in rating becomes effective and ending on the date immediately preceding the effective date of next change in rating.

The applicable margin for loans under the Revolving Credit Facility is determined in accordance with the table set forth below:and pay related accrued interest and (ii) for general corporate purposes.

Consolidated First Lien Leverage Ratio

 

Applicable

Margin for

LIBOR, CDOR,

EURIBOR and

Sterling LIBOR

Rate Loans

 

 

Applicable

Margin for

Base Rate

and Canadian

Prime Rate

Loans

 

Category 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greater than 4.50:1.00

 

 

2.75

%

 

 

1.75

%

Category 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than or equal to 4.50:1.00 and greater than 4.00:1.00

 

 

2.50

%

 

 

1.50

%

Category 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than or equal to 4.00:1.00

 

 

2.25

%

 

 

1.25

%

We are also required to pay a customary annual administration fee to the administrative agent under the Senior Credit Facilities.

For an additional description of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities,Facility and the Senior Convertible Notes, please refer to Note 9, “Debt,” to our consolidated financial statements.

Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth ourOur future contractual obligations generally consist of long-term debt, leases, retirement plans, and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2018, whether or not they appear on our consolidated balance sheet. Variable interest payments are projected based on an interest rate forecast in effect at the end of 2018. All amounts in the table may reflect rounding.

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

Less than

one year

 

 

1-3

Years

 

 

3-5

Years

 

 

More than

5 Years

 

 

Total

 

Long-term debt

 

$

6.8

 

 

$

13.6

 

 

$

13.6

 

 

$

644.3

 

 

$

678.3

 

Interest payable on long-term debt

 

 

40.6

 

 

 

79.9

 

 

 

78.1

 

 

 

51.1

 

 

 

249.7

 

Operating leases

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

14.7

 

 

 

11.6

 

 

 

7.6

 

 

 

43.0

 

Postretirement plan obligations (a)

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

16.0

 

Retirement plan obligations (a)

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

54.0

 

 

 

37.6

 

 

 

33.4

 

 

 

132.7

 

Total

 

$

66.5

 

 

$

166.1

 

 

$

144.4

 

 

$

742.7

 

 

$

1,119.7

 

(a)

We have not estimated our pension funding obligations beyond 2027, and thus, any potential future contributions have been excluded from the table.

vendor payments. Our long-term debt obligations are described in Note 9, “Debt,” to our consolidated financial statements.statements, and the “Our Indebtedness” section above.

The lease payments represent scheduled payments under the termsAs of the lease agreements. We conduct substantiallyDecember 31, 2021, all of our operations in leased facilities.facilities are leased. Most of these leases contain renewal options and require payments for taxes, insurance, and maintenance. We also lease equipment for use in our business. We ceased use of certain leased facilities during 2021 and 2020 and recognized lease abandonment charges within our consolidated statements of operations; however, we are still required to make future payments under the existing lease terms. Refer to Note 15, "Leases," to our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of our leases.


Payments of retirement plan obligations include employer commitments to fund our defined benefit and postretirement plans and do not include estimated future benefit payments to participants expected to be made from liquidation of the assets in our defined benefit plan trusts. AtDuring the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, we contributed $105.0 million to our largest U.S. pension plan, satisfying all expected contributions for the foreseeable future for this defined benefit plan. As of December 31, 2021, our defined benefit pension plans had a fair value of the plans’ assets that exceeded the projected benefit obligation by $1.6 million and our postretirement benefit plan had a projected benefit obligation that exceeded the fair value of the plans’ assets by $145.8 million and our postretirement benefit plan had an accumulated benefit obligation that exceeded the fair value of the plans’ assets by $16.8$12.6 million. We expect to satisfy these remaining obligations through investment income from and appreciation in the fair value of plan assets held in trust and from future employer contributions. Refer to Note 10, "Employee Benefit Plans," to our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of our employee benefit plans.

The amount of our future contractual obligation to vendors for capital expenditures atas of December 31, 20182021 was not material, and no such amount is included in the table above.material.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements and related notes, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements and related notes requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Certain of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based on our historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our evaluation of trends in the industry, information provided by our customers, and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an on-going basis. Our actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following are our critical accounting estimates:

40 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

Description: We recognize revenue for professional services and cloud subscription services performance obligations based on an allocation of the total transaction price to each performance obligation using the respective stand-alone selling prices (“SSP”). This can result in revenue being recognized in an amount that exceeds the amount we are contractually allowed to bill our customer as of a certain point in time, resulting in the recognition of a contract asset up until the period at which billings are equal to or exceed revenue recognition. We recognized $160.2 million of cloud professional services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021, and the related contract assets were $62.7 million as of December 31, 2021.

Judgments and Uncertainties: The determination of our stand-alone selling price for the performance obligations requires us to make assumptions based on market conditions and observable inputs, as well as an estimate of the total professional service hours expected to be incurred in connection with each customer implementation.

Sensitivity of Estimate to Change: The consideration allocated to professional services performed to activate a new customer is recognized as professional services revenues based on the proportion of total work performed to date compared to an estimation of total work expected to complete the implementation project for that customer account. To the extent this consideration exceeds the customer billings, a contract asset would be recognized. An increase or decrease in the estimation of total work expected to complete the implementation would impact the amount of consideration allocated to each of the performance obligations as well as the timing of revenue recognition, as professional services revenue related to implementation activities is generally recognized at the beginning of the contract.

Business Combinations

Description: We account for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. We allocate the purchase price of an acquired business to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the acquisition date with the excess recorded as goodwill.

Judgments and Uncertainties: The acquisition method of accounting requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions regarding the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. Fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired is determined through established valuation techniques, such as the income, cost or market approach. Generally, we use third-party valuation experts to assist in certain fair value determinations. The fair value measurements of identifiable intangibles are based on available historical information and expectations and assumptions about the future. Significant assumptions used to value identifiable intangible assets may include projected revenue growth, discount rates, royalty rates, customer attrition rates, and other factors.

Determining the useful life of an intangible asset also requires judgment. All acquired assets were determined to have useful lives.

Sensitivity of Estimate to Change: In 2021, we acquired Ascender, Ideal, DataFuzion, and ADAM HCM for $359.6 million, $41.4 million, $17.9 million, and $34.3 million, respectively, which included the acquisition of $7.1 million of trade names, $84.1 million of customer relationships, and $78.2 million in developed technology. We utilized third-party valuation specialists to perform the valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired for each acquisition.

Trade Names: From the Ascender, Ideal, and ADAM HCM acquisitions, we acquired trade names, which were determined to have a total fair value of $7.1 million using the relief from royalty method. Key assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the trade names using this method included revenue projections, royalty rates, and discount rates.

Customer Relationships: From the Ascender, Ideal, and ADAM HCM acquisitions, we acquired customer relationships, which were determined to have a total fair value of $84.1 million using the Multi-Period Excess Earnings Method (“MPEEM”) a form of the income approach, or variations of the MPEEM, such as the distributor method. Assumptions used in valuing these assets included future earnings projections, customer attrition rates, and discount rates, among others.

Developed Technology: From the Ascender, Ideal, DataFuzion, and ADAM HCM acquisitions, we acquired developed technology, which were determined to have a total fair value of $78.2 million using various methods, such as the relief from royalty method and the MPEEM, including the distributor method. Assumptions used in valuing these assets included future earnings projections, technology migration factors, royalty rates, tax rates, and discount rates, among others.

Contingent Consideration: From the DataFuzion acquisition, we recognized contingent consideration, which was determined to have a total fair value of $5.4 million, using two methods, a scenario-based method ("SBM") and an option

41 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

pricing model ("OPM"), specifically the Black Scholes Merton model. Key assumptions used in the SMB include possible outcomes, probability of occurrence, and discount factor. Key assumptions used in the OPM include expected present value of certain ARR, and volatility.

We believe the estimates applied to the valuations are based on reasonable assumptions, but are inherently uncertain. As a result, actual results may differ from the assumptions and judgments used to determine the fair value of the assets acquired, which could result in impairment losses in the future.

Please refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for a description of our revenue recognition and business combination policy and our significant accounting policies.  The accounting policies that we believe to be the most critical to an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations and that require the most complex and subjective management judgments are discussed below.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue from the sale of our services, net of applicable sales taxes, when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. We rely on a signed contract with the customer as the persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement.

We enter into revenue arrangements that may consist of multiple deliverables based on the needs of our customers. For example, our services address a broad range of employment process needs, such as payroll, payroll-related tax filing, human resource information, employee self-service capabilities, time and labor management, and recruitment and applicant screening. A customer arrangement may contain any of these elements with different elements delivered across multiple reporting periods.

We have a single unit of accounting for each deliverable in a contract based on the use of estimated selling price (“ESP”) in those cases where vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”) or third party evidence (“TPE”) cannot be established. Our determination of ESP involves the consideration of several factors based on the specific facts and circumstances of each contract. Specifically, we consider the cost to produce or to provide the deliverable, the anticipated margin on that deliverable, the selling price and profit margin for similar services, the value of any enhancements that have been built into the deliverable, and the characteristics of the varying markets in which the deliverable will be sold.

When we are unable to establish a selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use ESP in the allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a standalone basis.

We regularly review VSOE, TPE, and ESP and maintain internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates. There were no material impacts during the period, nor do we currently expect a material impact in the near term from changes in VSOE, TPE, or ESP.


Deferred revenue consists primarily of customer billings in advance of revenues being recognized from our contracts. Deferred revenue also includes certain deferred professional services fees that are accounted for as a single unit of accounting with subscription fees and are recognized as revenues over the same period as the related customer contract. Deferred revenue that is anticipated to be recognized during the succeeding twelve-month period is recorded as current deferred revenue, and the remaining portion is recorded as noncurrent.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Please refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for a full discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Non-GAAP Measures

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin

We believe that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin, non-GAAP financial measures, are useful to management and investors as supplemental measures to evaluate our overall operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA is a componentand Adjusted EBITDA margin are components of our management incentive plan and Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are used by management to assess performance and to compare our operating performance to our competitors.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income or loss(loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, and Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA, as adjusted to exclude net income or loss from discontinued operations, sponsor management fees, non-cash charges for asset impairments,foreign exchange gains or losses on assets and liabilities held in a foreign currency other than the functional currency of a company subsidiary,(losses), share-based compensation expense and related employer taxes, severance charges, restructuring consulting fees, transaction costs, and environmental reserve charges.certain other non-recurring items. Adjusted EBITDA margin is determined by calculating the percentage that Adjusted EBITDA is of total revenue. Management believes that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are helpful in highlighting management performance trends because EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin exclude the results of decisions that are outside the control of operating management.

Our presentation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are intended as supplemental measures of our performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin should not be considered as alternatives to operating profit (loss), net income (loss), earnings per share, or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP, or as measures of operating cash flows or liquidity. Our presentation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin should not be construed to imply that our future results will be unaffected by similar items to those eliminated in this presentation. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are included in this discussion because they are key metrics used by management to assess our operating performance.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin are not defined under GAAP, are not measures of net income, operating income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP, and are subject to important limitations. Our use of the terms EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies in our industry and are not measures of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin have important limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

are that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin do not reflect the following:

our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin do not reflect any charges for the assets being depreciated and amortized that may need to be replaced in the future;

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin do not reflect the impact of share-based compensation upon our results of operations;

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin do not reflect the significant interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt; and

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin do not reflect our income tax expense or the cash requirements to pay our income taxes.

taxes; and

42 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents


certain other non-recurring items.

In evaluating EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margin, you should be aware that in the future we may incur expenses similar to those eliminated in this presentation.

The following table reconciles operating profitnet loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Net loss

 

$

(75.4

)

 

$

(4.0

)

Interest expense, net

 

 

35.9

 

 

 

25.1

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

(14.9

)

 

 

(16.0

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

77.5

 

 

 

51.8

 

EBITDA

 

 

23.1

 

 

 

56.9

 

Foreign exchange loss (gain)

 

 

9.5

 

 

 

(1.0

)

Share-based compensation (a)

 

 

116.8

 

 

 

68.9

 

Severance charges (b)

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

9.7

 

Restructuring consulting fees (c)

 

 

16.7

 

 

 

8.1

 

Other non-recurring items (d)

 

 

(11.0

)

 

 

16.4

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

162.5

 

 

$

159.0

 

Net profit margin (e)

 

 

(7.4

)%

 

 

(0.5

)%

Adjusted EBITDA margin

 

 

15.9

%

 

 

18.9

%

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Operating profit (loss)

 

$

52.8

 

 

$

33.0

 

 

$

(11.2

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

56.6

 

 

 

53.8

 

 

 

53.2

 

EBITDA from continuing operations (1)

 

 

109.4

 

 

 

86.8

 

 

 

42.0

 

Sponsorship management fees (2)

 

 

12.0

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

5.0

 

Asset impairments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.2

 

Intercompany foreign exchange (gain) loss

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

(3.4

)

Share-based compensation (3)

 

 

24.7

 

 

 

16.1

 

 

 

12.5

 

Severance charges (4)

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

8.4

 

Restructuring consulting fees (5)

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.9

 

Environmental reserve charges (6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.9

 

Transaction costs (7)

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

157.1

 

 

$

117.8

 

 

$

85.5

 

Adjusted EBITDA margin

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

17.6

%

 

 

13.7

%

(a)
Represents share-based compensation expense and related employer taxes.
(b)
Represents costs for severance compensation paid to employees whose positions have been eliminated or who have been terminated not for cause.
(c)
Represents consulting fees and expenses incurred during the periods presented in connection with any acquisition, investment, disposition, recapitalization, equity offering, issuance or repayment of debt, issuance of equity interests, or refinancing.
(d)
Represents (1) impacts of changes to our facilities, resulting in a net gain of $19.1 million during 2021 primarily as a result of the sale of our St. Petersburg, Florida facility and charges of $16.8 million during 2020 related to the abandonment of certain leased facilities, (2) in 2021 the difference between the historical five-year average pension expense and the current period actuarially determined pension expense associated with the planned termination of the frozen U.S. pension plan and related changes in investment strategy associated with protecting the now fully funded status, (3) the impact of the fair value adjustment for the DataFuzion contingent consideration during 2021, and (4) recovery in 2020 of duplicate payments associated with the 2019 isolated service incident. Please refer to Note 15, “Leases”,Note 3, “Business Combinations,”, and Note 16, “Commitments and Contingencies” for further discussion of these items.
(e)
Net profit margin is determined by calculating the percentage that net (loss) income is of total revenue.

43 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K

(1)

We define EBITDA from continuing operations as net income or loss before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and net income or loss from discontinued operations.

(2)

Represents expenses related to management, monitoring, consulting, transaction, and advisory fees and related expenses paid to the affiliates of our Sponsors pursuant to the management agreement with THL Managers VI, LLC (“THLM”) and Cannae. In April 2018, the management agreements terminated upon consummation of our IPO. Upon termination, the management agreements provided that we pay a termination fee equal to the net present value of the management fee for a seven-year period, which was $11.3 million. Please refer to Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements, “Related Party Transactions,” for further information.

(3)

Share-based compensation expense during the year months ended December 31, 2018, includes $8.1 million of expense recognized upon meeting the performance criteria of stock appreciation rights and performance-based stock options that were triggered by our IPO.

(4)

Represents costs for severance compensation paid to employees whose positions have been eliminated or who have been terminated not for cause.

(5)

Represents consulting fees and expenses incurred during the periods presented in connection with any acquisition, investment, disposition, recapitalization, equity offering, issuance or repayment of debt, issuance of equity interests, or refinancing.

(6)

Reflects charges to increase the reserve for environmental claims from a predecessor company. Please refer to Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our environmental reserves.

(7)

Represents expenses related to the IPO and refinancing of our debt that were not eligible for capitalization.


Table of Contents

The following tables present a reconciliation of our reported results to our non-GAAP EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA basis for all periods presented:

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2021

 

 

 

As reported

 

 

Share-based
compensation

 

 

Severance
charges

 

 

Other
operating
expenses (a)

 

 

Adjusted (b)

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring

 

$

262.4

 

 

$

12.9

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

$

 

 

$

247.5

 

Professional services and other

 

 

194.6

 

 

 

9.5

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

184.9

 

Product development and management

 

 

134.0

 

 

 

18.0

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

115.4

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

50.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50.9

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

641.9

 

 

 

40.4

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

598.7

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

218.5

 

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

202.8

 

General and administrative

 

 

199.3

 

 

 

62.6

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

(2.0

)

 

 

136.0

 

Operating (loss) profit

 

 

(35.5

)

 

 

116.8

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

(2.0

)

 

 

86.7

 

Other expense, net

 

 

18.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.2

 

 

 

1.7

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

77.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77.5

 

EBITDA

 

$

23.1

 

 

$

116.8

 

 

$

7.4

 

 

$

15.2

 

 

$

162.5

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

35.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35.9

 

Income tax (benefit) expense (c)

 

 

(14.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(23.6

)

 

 

8.7

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

77.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77.5

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(75.4

)

 

$

116.8

 

 

$

7.4

 

 

$

(8.4

)

 

$

40.4

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

As reported

 

 

Share-based

compensation

 

 

Severance

charges

 

 

Other

operating

expenses (1)

 

 

Adjusted

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

200.3

 

 

$

2.1

 

 

$

1.3

 

 

$

 

 

$

196.9

 

Professional services and other

 

 

132.2

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

130.0

 

Product development and management

 

 

59.0

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

57.8

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

34.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34.3

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

425.8

 

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

2.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

419.0

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

131.9

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

126.2

 

General and administrative

 

 

138.8

 

 

 

16.0

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

20.5

 

 

 

100.7

 

Other income, net

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

 

Operating profit

 

 

52.8

 

 

 

24.7

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

17.6

 

 

 

100.5

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

56.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56.6

 

EBITDA from continuing operations

 

$

109.4

 

 

$

24.7

 

 

$

5.4

 

 

$

17.6

 

 

$

157.1

 

(a)
Other operating expenses includes net gain of $19.1 million during 2021 primarily as a result of the sale of our St. Petersburg, Florida facility, intercompany foreign exchange loss, restructuring consulting fees, the difference between the historical five-year average pension expense and the current period actuarially determined pension expense associated with the planned termination of the frozen U.S. pension plan and related changes in investment strategy associated with protecting the now fully funded status, and the impact of the fair value adjustment for the DataFuzion contingent consideration.

(1)

Other operating expenses includes sponsor management fees, intercompany foreign exchange gain, restructuring consulting fees, and transaction costs.

(b)
The Adjusted amount is a non-GAAP financial measure.

(c)
Income tax effects have been calculated based on the statutory tax rates in effect in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions during the period.

44 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

 

 

As reported

 

 

Share-based
compensation

 

 

Severance
charges

 

 

Other
operating
expenses (a)

 

 

Adjusted (b)

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring

 

$

213.3

 

 

$

6.1

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

 

 

$

205.4

 

Professional services and other

 

 

163.7

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

159.0

 

Product development and management

 

 

83.7

 

 

 

8.7

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

73.5

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

40.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40.5

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

501.2

 

 

 

18.6

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

478.4

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

165.6

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

154.3

 

General and administrative

 

 

167.9

 

 

 

42.3

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

24.5

 

 

 

98.9

 

Operating profit

 

 

7.8

 

 

 

68.9

 

 

 

9.7

 

 

 

24.5

 

 

 

110.9

 

Other expense (income), net

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

3.7

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

51.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51.8

 

EBITDA

 

$

56.9

 

 

$

68.9

 

 

$

9.7

 

 

$

23.5

 

 

$

159.0

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

25.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.1

 

Income tax (benefit) expense (c)

 

 

(16.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(25.0

)

 

 

9.0

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

51.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51.8

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(4.0

)

 

$

68.9

 

 

$

9.7

 

 

$

(1.5

)

 

$

73.1

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

As reported

 

 

Share-based

compensation

 

 

Severance

charges

 

 

Other

operating

expenses (1)

 

 

Adjusted

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

196.8

 

 

$

1.0

 

 

$

2.2

 

 

$

 

 

$

193.6

 

Professional services and other

 

 

135.8

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

133.8

 

Product development and management

 

 

43.6

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

42.2

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

31.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.3

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

407.5

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

400.9

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

116.7

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

113.9

 

General and administrative

 

 

106.3

 

 

 

11.6

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

92.1

 

Other expense (income), net

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

(0.1

)

Operating profit

 

 

33.0

 

 

 

16.1

 

 

 

5.6

 

 

 

9.3

 

 

 

64.0

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

53.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53.8

 

EBITDA from continuing operations

 

$

86.8

 

 

$

16.1

 

 

$

5.6

 

 

$

9.3

 

 

$

117.8

 

(a)
Other operating expenses includes lease abandonment charges, intercompany foreign exchange loss, restructuring consulting fees, and recovery of duplicate payments associated with the 2019 isolated service incident.

(1)

Other operating expenses includes sponsor management fees, intercompany foreign exchange loss (gain), and restructuring consulting fees.

(b)
The Adjusted amount is a non-GAAP financial measure.
(c)
Income tax effects have been calculated based on the statutory tax rates in effect in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions during the period.

45 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

As reported

 

 

Share-based

compensation

 

 

Severance

charges

 

 

Other

operating

expenses (1)

 

 

Adjusted

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

214.4

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

$

1.6

 

 

$

 

 

$

210.8

 

Professional services and other

 

 

115.6

 

 

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

113.9

 

Product development and management

 

 

43.3

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

41.1

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

23.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.1

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

396.4

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

388.9

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

101.5

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

99.6

 

General and administrative

 

 

123.8

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

102.4

 

Other expense, net

 

 

12.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

0.2

 

Operating (loss) profit

 

 

(11.2

)

 

 

12.5

 

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

22.6

 

 

 

32.3

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

53.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53.2

 

EBITDA from continuing operations

 

$

42.0

 

 

$

12.5

 

 

$

8.4

 

 

$

22.6

 

 

$

85.5

 

(1)

Other operating expenses includes sponsor management fees, intercompany foreign exchange loss, restructuring consulting fees, asset impairments, and environmental reserve charges.



Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and QualitativeQualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to market risks related to foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and pension obligations. We seek to minimize or manage these market risks through normal operating and financing activities. These market risks may be amplified by events and factors surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. We do not trade or use instruments with the objective of earning financial gains on the market fluctuations, nor do we use instruments where there are not underlying exposures.

Foreign Currency Risk. Our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly changes in the Canadian Dollar. Our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates has historically been partially hedged as our foreign currency denominated inflows create a natural hedge against our foreign currency denominated expenses. Accordingly, our results of operations and cash flows were not materially affected by fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates, and we believe that a hypothetical 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates or an inability to access foreign funds would not materially affect our ability to meet our operational needs or result in a material foreign currency loss in the future. Due to the relative size of our international operations to date, we have not instituted an active hedging program. We expect our international operations to continue to grow in the near term, and we are monitoring the foreign currency exposure to determine if we should begin a hedging program.

Interest Rate Risk. In connection with our U.S. and Canadian payroll and tax filing services,certain jurisdictions, we collect funds for payment of payroll and taxes; temporarily hold such funds in trustsegregated accounts until payment is due; remit the funds to the customers’ employees and appropriate taxing authority; file federal, state and local tax returns; and handle related regulatory correspondence and amendments. We invest the U.S. customer trust funds primarily in high- qualityhigh-quality bank deposits, money market mutual funds, commercial paper or collateralized short-term investments. We may also invest these funds in U.S. Treasury and agencygovernment securities, as well as highly rated asset-backed, mortgage-backed, municipal,corporate, and corporate securities. Our Canadianbank securities

Based on current market conditions, portfolio composition, and investment practices, a 100 basis point increase in market investment rates would result in approximately $23 million of increase in float revenue over the ensuing twelve month period. In addition, we also have exposure to risks associated with changes in laws and regulations that may affect customer trust fundsfund balances. For example, a change in regulations, either reducing the amount of taxes to be withheld or allowing less time to remit taxes to government authorities, would reduce our average customer fund balances and float revenue. There are investedno incremental costs of revenue associated with changes in securities issued by the government and provinces of Canada, highly rated Canadian banks and corporations, asset-backed trusts, and mortgages.float revenue.

We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. Our cash equivalents and our portfolio of marketable securities are subject to market risk due to changes in interest rates. Fixed rate securities may have their market value adversely affected due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectation due to changes in interest rates or we may suffer losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that decline in market value due to changes in interest rates. However, because we classify our securities as “available for sale,” no gains or losses are recognized due to changes in interest rates unless such securities are sold prior to maturity or declines in fair value are determined to be other-than-temporary.unrecoverable.

We do not believe that an increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would have a material effect on our operating results or financial condition. Fluctuations in the value of our investment securities caused by a change in interest rates (gains or losses on the carrying value) are recorded in other comprehensive income and are realized only if we sell the underlying securities.

A 100 basis point increase in the LIBOR rates would result in an approximately $7 million increase in our interest expense, net over the ensuring twelve-month period. Please refer to Note 9, “Debt,” for additional information.

46 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Pension Obligation Risk. We provide a pension plan for a numbercertain current and former U.S. employees that closed to new participants on January 2, 1995. In 2007, the U.S. pension plan was amended (1) to exclude from further participation any participant or former participant who was not employed by the company or another participating employer on January 1, 2008, (2) to discontinue participant contributions, and (3) to freeze the accrual of former employees. additional benefits as of December 31, 2007. In applying relevant accounting policies, we have made critical estimates related to actuarial assumptions, including assumptions of expected returns on plan assets, discount rates, and health care cost trends. The cost of pension benefits in future periods will depend on actual returns on plan assets, assumptions for future periods, contributions, and benefit experience. In 2018, we contributed $18.5As of December 31, 2021, the fair value of plan assets exceeded the projected benefit obligation ("PBO") by $1.6 million and therefore was fully funded. Please refer to our pension plan.Note 10, "Employee Benefit Plans," for additional information.

The effective discount rate used in accounting for pension and other benefit obligations in 20182021 ranged from 3.70%2.00% to 3.92%2.36%. The expected rate of return on plan assets for qualified pension benefits in 20182021 was 6.30%2.70%. The following table reflects the estimated sensitivity associated with a change in certain significant actuarial assumptions (each assumption change is presented mutually exclusive of other assumption changes):

 

 

 

Impact on 2018 Pension Expense

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

 

Impact on 2022 Pension Expense
Increase (Decrease)

 

 

Change in

Assumption

 

Pension

Benefits

 

 

Post

Retirement

 

 

Change in
Assumption

 

Pension
Benefits

 

 

Post
Retirement

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Increase in discount rate

 

50 basis points

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

 

 

50 basis points

 

$

0.6

 

$

 

Decrease in discount rate

 

50 basis points

 

$

(0.2

)

 

$

 

 

50 basis points

 

$

(0.6

)

 

$

 

Increase in return on plan asset

 

50 basis points

 

$

(2.0

)

 

$

 

 

50 basis points

 

$

(2.4

)

 

N/A

 

Decrease in return on plan asset

 

50 basis points

 

$

2.0

 

 

$

 

 

50 basis points

 

$

2.4

 

N/A

 


47 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial StatementsStatements and Supplementary Data.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

Page

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CERIDIAN HCM HOLDING INC.

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

67

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20182021 and 20172020

6852

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 20162019

6953

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 20162019

7054

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 20162019

7155

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 20162019

7256

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

7357


48 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Report of Independent RegisteredRegistered Public Accounting Firm

The

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors


Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.:

OpinionOpinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three yearthree-year period ended December 31, 2018,2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Basis for Opinion

TheseThe Company acquired Ascender HCM Pty Limited during 2021, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, Ascender HCM Pty Limited’s internal control over financial reporting associated with consolidated total assets of 5% and consolidated total revenue of 7% included in the consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Ascender HCM Pty Limited.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management.management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in

49 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Stand-alone selling price of cloud professional services

The Company recognized $160.2 million of cloud professional services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021, and the related contract assets were $62.7 million as of December 31, 2021. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s cloud service arrangements include professional services revenue for the implementation of new customers or customer migrations, followed by access to the Company’s hosted payroll processing solution. Revenue recognized for the professional services and payroll processing performance obligations is based on an allocation of the total transaction price to each performance obligation using their respective stand-alone selling prices. This results in revenue being recognized in an amount that exceeds the amount the Company is contractually allowed to bill their customer, resulting in the recognition of a contract asset. The determination of the stand-alone selling price for the performance obligations requires the Company to make assumptions based on market conditions and observable inputs, as well as an estimate of the total professional service hours expected to be incurred in connection with the implementation.

We identified the assessment of the Company’s total estimated professional services hours expected to be incurred when determining the stand-alone selling price of the cloud professional services performance obligation for implementation as a critical audit matter. The testing of the professional services hours assumption required a higher degree of auditor subjectivity as the assumption is internally-developed and there is no observable market information.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the critical audit matter. This included a control related to the Company’s process for estimating the total professional services hours expected to be incurred in determining the estimated selling price of the cloud professional services performance obligation, as well as internal controls related to the ongoing monitoring and accounting for changes to the total estimated professional services hours during the implementation phase. For a sample of contracts, we evaluated the Company’s ability to accurately estimate the total hours expected to be incurred for the professional services performance obligation by comparing the estimated hours to the actual hours incurred. For a sample of contracts, we inquired of the project manager regarding the estimation of the total hours to be incurred and compared the project manager’s estimate to the Company’s revenue model used to determine the estimated selling price of the cloud professional services performance obligation for implementation.

Acquisition-date fair value of customer relationships intangible asset

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on March 1, 2021, the Company completed the purchase of 100% of the outstanding shares of Ascender HCM Pty Limited for a purchase price of $359.6 million (the “Transaction”). The Company records all assets and liabilities, including intangible assets, acquired in a

50 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

business combination at fair value. The Company acquired various intangible assets in the Transaction, including a customer relationships intangible asset associated with the generation of future income from existing customers. The acquisition-date fair value for this asset was $76.5 million.

We identified the evaluation of the acquisition-date fair value of the customer relationships intangible asset as a critical audit matter. There was a higher degree of subjective auditor judgment in evaluating forecasted EBITDA margins used in the fair value measurement of the customer relationships intangible asset.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company’s acquisition-date valuation process, including a control related to management’s assessment of the forecasted EBITDA margins. To assess the forecasted EBITDA margins used in the valuation, we compared the forecasted EBITDA margins to Ascender HCM Pty Limited’s historical results and EBITDA margins of comparable companies. In addition, we performed sensitivity analyses over the acquisition-date fair value of the customer relationships intangible asset by considering reasonably possible changes to forecasted EBITDA margins and comparing the results to the Company’s fair value estimate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1958.e Company’s auditor since 1958.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 25, 2022

February 28, 201951 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents


Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in millions, except share data)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions, except share data)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents

 

$

367.5

 

 

$

188.2

 

Restricted cash

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

 

Trade and other receivables, net

 

 

146.3

 

 

 

101.1

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

92.6

 

 

 

73.9

 

Total current assets before customer funds

 

 

608.3

 

 

 

363.2

 

Customer funds

 

 

3,535.8

 

 

 

3,759.4

 

Total current assets

 

 

4,144.1

 

 

 

4,122.6

 

Right of use lease asset

 

 

29.4

 

 

 

27.9

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net

 

 

128.2

 

 

 

136.4

 

Goodwill

 

 

2,323.6

 

 

 

2,031.8

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

 

332.5

 

 

 

195.0

 

Other assets

 

 

208.4

 

 

 

187.6

 

Total assets

 

$

7,166.2

 

 

$

6,701.3

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

8.3

 

 

$

7.2

 

Current portion of long-term lease liabilities

 

 

11.3

 

 

 

10.5

 

Accounts payable

 

 

51.7

 

 

 

38.9

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

48.7

 

 

 

24.4

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

77.3

 

 

 

64.6

 

Other accrued expenses

 

 

24.7

 

 

 

20.5

 

Total current liabilities before customer funds obligations

 

 

222.0

 

 

 

166.1

 

Customer funds obligations

 

 

3,519.9

 

 

 

3,697.8

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

3,741.9

 

 

 

3,863.9

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

 

1,124.4

 

 

 

660.6

 

Employee benefit plans

 

 

20.7

 

 

 

24.4

 

Long-term lease liabilities, less current portion

 

 

32.7

 

 

 

33.6

 

Other liabilities

 

 

19.0

 

 

 

20.6

 

Total liabilities

 

 

4,938.7

 

 

 

4,603.1

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 151,995,031 and 148,571,412 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

1.5

 

Additional paid in capital

 

 

2,860.0

 

 

 

2,606.5

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(309.2

)

 

 

(233.8

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(324.8

)

 

 

(276.0

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

2,227.5

 

 

 

2,098.2

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

7,166.2

 

 

$

6,701.3

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents

 

$

217.8

 

 

$

94.2

 

Trade and other receivables, net

 

 

69.9

 

 

 

66.6

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

40.3

 

 

 

36.4

 

Assets of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

156.2

 

Other current assets

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

5.3

 

Total current assets before customer trust funds

 

 

330.0

 

 

 

358.7

 

Customer trust funds

 

 

2,603.5

 

 

 

4,099.7

 

Total current assets

 

 

2,933.5

 

 

 

4,458.4

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net

 

 

104.4

 

 

 

102.0

 

Goodwill

 

 

1,927.4

 

 

 

1,961.0

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

 

187.5

 

 

 

206.5

 

Other assets

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

2.0

 

Total assets

 

$

5,154.4

 

 

$

6,729.9

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

6.8

 

 

$

 

Accounts payable

 

 

41.5

 

 

 

44.4

 

Accrued interest

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

15.9

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

17.2

 

 

 

14.0

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

54.5

 

 

 

68.8

 

Liabilities of discontinued operations

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

19.6

 

Other accrued expenses

 

 

23.6

 

 

 

15.0

 

Total current liabilities before customer trust funds obligations

 

 

143.9

 

 

 

177.7

 

Customer trust funds obligations

 

 

2,619.7

 

 

 

4,105.5

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

2,763.6

 

 

 

4,283.2

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

 

663.5

 

 

 

1,119.8

 

Employee benefit plans

 

 

153.3

 

 

 

152.4

 

Other liabilities

 

 

42.0

 

 

 

45.5

 

Total liabilities

 

 

3,622.4

 

 

 

5,600.9

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior preferred stock, $0.01 par, 70,000,000 shares authorized, 16,802,144

   shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

184.8

 

Junior preferred stock, $0.01 par, 70,000,000 shares authorized, 58,244,308

   shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

Common stock, $0.01 par, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 139,453,710

     shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018, and 150,000,000

     shares authorized, 65,285,962 shares issued and outstanding as of

     December 31, 2017

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

0.7

 

Additional paid in capital

 

 

2,325.6

 

 

 

1,565.4

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(419.3

)

 

 

(348.2

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(375.7

)

 

 

(312.1

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

1,532.0

 

 

 

1,091.2

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

37.8

 

Total equity

 

 

1,532.0

 

 

 

1,129.0

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

5,154.4

 

 

$

6,729.9

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


52 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring

 

$

850.7

 

 

$

690.2

 

 

$

680.1

 

Professional services and other

 

 

173.5

 

 

 

152.3

 

 

 

144.0

 

Total revenue

 

 

1,024.2

 

 

 

842.5

 

 

 

824.1

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring

 

 

262.4

 

 

 

213.3

 

 

 

201.8

 

Professional services and other

 

 

194.6

 

 

 

163.7

 

 

 

149.8

 

Product development and management

 

 

134.0

 

 

 

83.7

 

 

 

67.9

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

50.9

 

 

 

40.5

 

 

 

36.4

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

641.9

 

 

 

501.2

 

 

 

455.9

 

Gross profit

 

 

382.3

 

 

 

341.3

 

 

 

368.2

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

417.8

 

 

 

333.5

 

 

 

295.9

 

Operating (loss) profit

 

 

(35.5

)

 

 

7.8

 

 

 

72.3

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

35.9

 

 

 

25.1

 

 

 

32.4

 

Other expense, net

 

 

18.9

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

5.6

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

 

(90.3

)

 

 

(20.0

)

 

 

34.3

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

(14.9

)

 

 

(16.0

)

 

 

(44.4

)

Net (loss) income

 

$

(75.4

)

 

$

(4.0

)

 

$

78.7

 

Net (loss) income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(0.50

)

 

$

(0.03

)

 

$

0.55

 

Diluted

 

$

(0.50

)

 

$

(0.03

)

 

$

0.53

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

150,402,321

 

 

 

146,774,471

 

 

 

142,049,112

 

Diluted

 

 

150,402,321

 

 

 

146,774,471

 

 

 

148,756,592

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

652.5

 

 

$

598.5

 

 

$

558.5

 

Professional services and other

 

 

93.9

 

 

 

72.3

 

 

 

64.9

 

Total revenue

 

 

746.4

 

 

 

670.8

 

 

 

623.4

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

 

200.3

 

 

 

196.8

 

 

 

214.4

 

Professional services and other

 

 

132.2

 

 

 

135.8

 

 

 

115.6

 

Product development and management

 

 

59.0

 

 

 

43.6

 

 

 

43.3

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

34.3

 

 

 

31.3

 

 

 

23.1

 

Total cost of revenue

 

 

425.8

 

 

 

407.5

 

 

 

396.4

 

Gross profit

 

 

320.6

 

 

 

263.3

 

 

 

227.0

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

270.7

 

 

 

223.0

 

 

 

225.3

 

Other (income) expense, net

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

12.9

 

Operating profit (loss)

 

 

52.8

 

 

 

33.0

 

 

 

(11.2

)

Interest expense, net

 

 

83.2

 

 

 

87.1

 

 

 

87.4

 

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

(30.4

)

 

 

(54.1

)

 

 

(98.6

)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

(49.6

)

 

 

6.7

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

 

(38.1

)

 

 

(4.5

)

 

 

(105.3

)

(Loss) income from discontinued operations

 

 

(25.8

)

 

 

(6.0

)

 

 

12.5

 

Net loss

 

 

(63.9

)

 

 

(10.5

)

 

 

(92.8

)

Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

0.1

 

Net loss attributable to Ceridian

 

$

(63.4

)

 

$

(9.2

)

 

$

(92.9

)

Net loss per share attributable to Ceridian—basic and diluted (Note 19)

 

$

(0.62

)

 

$

(0.46

)

 

$

(1.65

)

Weighted-average shares used to compute net loss per share

   attributable to Ceridian—basic and diluted (Note 19)

 

 

114,049,682

 

 

 

65,204,960

 

 

 

64,988,338

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 


53 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Dollars

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(75.4

)

 

$

(4.0

)

 

$

78.7

 

Items of other comprehensive (loss) income before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

(17.6

)

 

 

18.7

 

 

 

29.1

 

Change in unrealized (loss) gain from invested customer funds

 

 

(48.4

)

 

 

38.4

 

 

 

37.7

 

Change in pension liability adjustment (1)

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

21.2

 

 

 

9.8

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before income taxes

 

 

(60.0

)

 

 

78.3

 

 

 

76.6

 

Income tax (benefit) expense, net

 

 

(11.2

)

 

 

15.9

 

 

 

12.0

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income after income taxes

 

 

(48.8

)

 

 

62.4

 

 

 

64.6

 

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

$

(124.2

)

 

$

58.4

 

 

$

143.3

 

(1)
The amount of the pension liability adjustment recognized in millions)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net loss

 

$

(63.9

)

 

$

(10.5

)

 

$

(92.8

)

Items of other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

(47.4

)

 

 

39.7

 

 

 

24.4

 

Change in unrealized gain from invested customer trust funds

 

 

(10.5

)

 

 

(17.3

)

 

 

(10.2

)

Change in pension liability adjustment (1)

 

 

(7.6

)

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

13.6

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before income taxes

 

 

(65.5

)

 

 

36.2

 

 

 

27.8

 

Income tax (benefit) expense, net

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

(3.6

)

 

 

0.6

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income after income taxes

 

 

(64.3

)

 

 

39.8

 

 

 

27.2

 

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(128.2

)

 

 

29.3

 

 

 

(65.6

)

Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the Ceridian

 

$

(127.7

)

 

$

30.2

 

 

$

(65.1

)

the consolidated statements of operations within other expense, net was $15.1 million, $13.2 million, and $10.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

(1)

The amount of the pension liability adjustment recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations within selling, general, and administrative expense was $11.7, $10.1 and $9.9 during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

54 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K



Table of Contents

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Dollars in millions, except share data)

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Additional
Paid In

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive

 

 

Total
Stockholders'

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

$

 

 

Capital

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Loss

 

 

Equity

 

 

(Dollars in millions, expect share data)

 

Balance as of December 31, 2018

 

 

139,453,710

 

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

2,325.6

 

 

$

(335.6

)

 

$

(375.9

)

 

$

1,615.5

 

Cumulative-effect adjustments to accumulated deficit related to the adoption of ASU 2018-02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27.1

 

 

 

(27.1

)

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

78.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

78.7

 

Issuance of common stock under share-based compensation plans

 

 

4,932,908

 

 

 

 

 

 

87.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

87.0

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36.5

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.1

 

 

 

29.1

 

Change in unrealized gain, net of tax $9.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.1

 

 

 

28.1

 

Change in minimum pension & postretirement liability, net of tax of $2.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

 

7.4

 

Balance as of December 31, 2019

 

 

144,386,618

 

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

2,449.1

 

 

$

(229.8

)

 

$

(338.4

)

 

$

1,882.3

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

(4.0

)

Issuance of common stock under share-based compensation plans

 

 

4,184,794

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

91.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

91.7

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65.8

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.7

 

 

 

18.7

 

Change in unrealized gain, net of tax $10.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.2

 

 

 

28.2

 

Change in minimum pension & postretirement liability, net of tax of $5.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.5

 

 

 

15.5

 

Balance as of December 31, 2020

 

 

148,571,412

 

 

$

1.5

 

 

$

2,606.5

 

 

$

(233.8

)

 

$

(276.0

)

 

$

2,098.2

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(75.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

(75.4

)

Issuance of common stock under share-based compensation plans

 

 

3,423,619

 

 

 

 

 

 

95.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95.4

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

113.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

113.4

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(17.6

)

 

 

(17.6

)

Change in unrealized loss, net of tax ($12.8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(35.6

)

 

 

(35.6

)

Change in minimum pension & postretirement liability, net of tax of $1.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

4.4

 

Equity component of convertible senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77.7

 

Purchase of capped calls related to convertible senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(33.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(33.0

)

Balance as of December 31, 2021

 

 

151,995,031

 

 

$

1.5

 

 

$

2,860.0

 

 

$

(309.2

)

 

$

(324.8

)

 

$

2,227.5

 

 

 

Senior Preferred

Stock

 

 

Junior Preferred

Stock

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Additional Paid In

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

 

 

Receivable

from

 

 

Total

Stockholders

 

 

Non-controlling

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

$

 

 

Shares

 

 

$

 

 

Shares

 

 

$

 

 

Capital

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Loss

 

 

Stockholder

 

 

Equity

 

 

Interest

 

 

Equity

 

Balance as of December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

58,244,308

 

 

$

0.6

 

 

 

64,924,845

 

 

$

0.7

 

 

$

1,531.5

 

 

$

(211.5

)

 

$

(379.2

)

 

$

 

 

$

942.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

942.1

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(92.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(92.9

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(92.8

)

Issuance of Common Stock upon vesting of

   restricted stock units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

76,192

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of Senior Preferred Stock

 

 

16,802,144

 

 

 

150.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(75.2

)

 

 

75.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

75.0

 

Addition of noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39.2

 

 

 

39.2

 

Sale of the UK Business, net of tax $2.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.9

 

Senior preferred dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

14.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.3

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

7.4

 

Change in unrealized loss, net of tax of ($2.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(8.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

(8.2

)

Change in minimum pension &

   postretirement liability, net of tax of $0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

Balance as of December 31, 2016

 

 

16,802,144

 

 

$

164.3

 

 

 

58,244,308

 

 

$

0.6

 

 

 

65,001,037

 

 

$

0.7

 

 

$

1,546.8

 

 

$

(318.5

)

 

$

(351.5

)

 

$

(75.2

)

 

$

967.2

 

 

$

38.7

 

 

$

1,005.9

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9.2

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(10.5

)

Issuance of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

183,425

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of

   options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

653,214

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock upon vesting of

   restricted stock units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

76,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share repurchase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(627,904

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1.8

)

Payment for Issuance of Senior Preferred

   Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75.2

 

 

 

75.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

75.2

 

Senior preferred dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

20.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.2

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

39.3

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

39.7

 

Change in unrealized loss, net of tax ($3.6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

(13.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

(13.7

)

Change in minimum pension &

   postretirement liability, net of tax of $0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.8

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

 

16,802,144

 

 

$

184.8

 

 

 

58,244,308

 

 

$

0.6

 

 

 

65,285,962

 

 

$

0.7

 

 

$

1,565.4

 

 

$

(348.2

)

 

$

(312.1

)

 

$

 

 

$

1,091.2

 

 

$

37.8

 

 

$

1,129.0

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(63.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(63.4

)

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

(63.9

)

Issuance of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,695,455

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

594.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

595.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

595.0

 

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of

   options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,119,653

 

 

 

 

 

 

45.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

45.0

 

Issuance of common stock upon vesting of

   restricted stock units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

105,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior preferred dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of senior and junior preferred shares

 

 

(16,802,144

)

 

 

(192.5

)

 

 

(58,244,308

)

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

42,246,650

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

192.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LifeWorks Disposition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(95.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(95.0

)

 

 

(37.3

)

 

 

(132.3

)

Share-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.5

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(47.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

(47.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

(47.4

)

Change in unrealized loss, net of tax ($1.2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(9.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(9.3

)

Change in minimum pension &

   postretirement liability, net of tax of $0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

(7.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

(7.6

)

Balance as of December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

139,453,710

 

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

2,325.6

 

 

$

(419.3

)

 

$

(375.7

)

 

$

 

 

$

1,532.0

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,532.0

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

55 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K



Table of Contents

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(75.4

)

 

$

(4.0

)

 

$

78.7

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income tax benefit

 

 

(38.5

)

 

 

(7.0

)

 

 

(69.4

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

77.5

 

 

 

51.8

 

 

 

57.1

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount

 

 

16.9

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

1.2

 

Lease abandonment costs

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

16.8

 

 

 

 

Net periodic pension and postretirement cost

 

 

8.8

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

5.2

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

3.2

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

113.4

 

 

 

65.8

 

 

 

36.5

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

(19.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

(0.4

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of acquisitions and divestitures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and other receivables

 

 

(34.8

)

 

 

(12.0

)

 

 

(16.4

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(12.3

)

 

 

(6.8

)

 

 

(8.0

)

Accounts payable and other accrued expenses

 

 

9.3

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

3.8

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

0.8

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

(104.0

)

 

 

(11.1

)

Accrued interest

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued taxes

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(3.7

)

 

 

(11.1

)

Other assets and liabilities

 

 

(11.8

)

 

 

(32.0

)

 

 

(19.5

)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

48.8

 

 

 

(30.2

)

 

 

50.6

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of customer funds marketable securities

 

 

(763.8

)

 

 

(212.4

)

 

 

(408.4

)

Proceeds from sale and maturity of customer funds marketable securities

 

 

488.0

 

 

 

369.3

 

 

 

374.5

 

Expenditures for property, plant, and equipment

 

 

(11.5

)

 

 

(18.1

)

 

 

(16.3

)

Expenditures for software and technology

 

 

(52.2

)

 

 

(41.7

)

 

 

(38.9

)

Net proceeds from sale of assets

 

 

37.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition costs, net of cash and restricted cash acquired

 

 

(409.5

)

 

 

(58.3

)

 

 

(30.2

)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

 

(711.1

)

 

 

38.8

 

 

 

(119.3

)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase in customer funds obligations, net

 

 

(195.7

)

 

 

483.6

 

 

 

529.9

 

Repayment of long-term debt obligations

 

 

(7.8

)

 

 

(10.0

)

 

 

(7.2

)

Proceeds from revolving credit facility

 

 

295.0

 

 

 

295.0

 

 

 

 

Repayment of revolving credit facility

 

 

(295.0

)

 

 

(295.0

)

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock under share-based compensation plans

 

 

95.4

 

 

 

91.7

 

 

 

87.0

 

Proceeds from issuance of convertible senior notes, net of issuance costs

 

 

561.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of capped calls related to convertible senior notes

 

 

(45.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payment of debt refinancing costs

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

407.5

 

 

 

565.3

 

 

 

609.7

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, restricted cash, and equivalents

 

 

(20.9

)

 

 

(4.0

)

 

 

11.3

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents

 

 

(275.7

)

 

 

569.9

 

 

 

552.3

 

Cash, restricted cash, and equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

2,228.5

 

 

 

1,658.6

 

 

 

1,106.3

 

Cash, restricted cash, and equivalents at end of year

 

$

1,952.8

 

 

$

2,228.5

 

 

$

1,658.6

 

Reconciliation of cash, restricted cash, and equivalents to the consolidated balance sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents

 

$

367.5

 

 

$

188.2

 

 

$

281.3

 

Restricted cash

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted cash and equivalents included in customer funds

 

 

1,583.4

 

 

 

2,040.3

 

 

 

1,377.3

 

Total cash, restricted cash, and equivalents

 

$

1,952.8

 

 

$

2,228.5

 

 

$

1,658.6

 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

19.1

 

 

$

26.7

 

 

$

37.4

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

 

33.4

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

 

36.2

 

Cash received from income tax refunds

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

9.6

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net loss

 

$

(63.9

)

 

$

(10.5

)

 

$

(92.8

)

Loss (income) from discontinued operations

 

 

25.8

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

(12.5

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income tax benefit

 

 

(16.8

)

 

 

(62.3

)

 

 

(8.3

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

56.6

 

 

 

53.8

 

 

 

53.2

 

Asset impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

3.5

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

25.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net periodic pension and postretirement cost

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

3.0

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

23.2

 

 

 

16.1

 

 

 

12.5

 

Environmental reserve

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.9

 

Other

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

1.2

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities excluding effects of acquisitions and divestitures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and other receivables

 

 

(5.3

)

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

(5.8

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(4.6

)

 

 

(6.9

)

 

 

1.1

 

Accounts payable and other accrued expenses

 

 

(6.4

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(4.4

)

Deferred revenue

 

 

3.5

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

(1.8

)

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

(22.1

)

 

 

(26.1

)

 

 

(49.1

)

Accrued interest

 

 

(15.7

)

 

 

(4.8

)

 

 

(0.2

)

Accrued taxes

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

(6.7

)

 

 

14.7

 

Other assets and liabilities

 

 

(2.8

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(3.8

)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities—continuing operations

 

 

10.7

 

 

 

(29.4

)

 

 

(73.2

)

Net cash used in operating activities—discontinued operations

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

(10.4

)

 

 

(2.3

)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

9.5

 

 

 

(39.8

)

 

 

(75.5

)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of customer trust funds marketable securities

 

 

(855.2

)

 

 

(598.5

)

 

 

(699.7

)

Proceeds from sale and maturity of customer trust funds marketable securities

 

 

844.3

 

 

 

610.2

 

 

 

677.6

 

Net change in restricted cash and other restricted assets held to satisfy customer trust funds

   obligations

 

 

1,430.3

 

 

 

(367.8

)

 

 

677.8

 

Expenditures for property, plant, and equipment

 

 

(8.0

)

 

 

(17.5

)

 

 

(7.4

)

Expenditures for software and technology

 

 

(32.2

)

 

 

(33.1

)

 

 

(25.5

)

Net proceeds from divestitures

 

 

 

 

 

(0.5

)

 

 

101.6

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities—continuing operations

 

 

1,379.2

 

 

 

(407.2

)

 

 

724.4

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities—discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

38.6

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

 

1,379.2

 

 

 

(407.4

)

 

 

763.0

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase in customer trust funds obligations, net

 

 

(1,419.4

)

 

 

356.1

 

 

 

(655.7

)

Net proceeds from issuance of stock

 

 

595.0

 

 

 

78.4

 

 

 

75.0

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

 

 

45.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchase of stock

 

 

 

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt issuance

 

 

680.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of long-term debt obligations

 

 

(1,134.0

)

 

 

(25.9

)

 

 

(11.8

)

Payment of debt refinancing costs

 

 

(23.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities—continuing operations

 

 

(1,255.9

)

 

 

406.8

 

 

 

(592.5

)

Net cash used in financing activities—discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(38.2

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(1,255.9

)

 

 

406.8

 

 

 

(630.7

)

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash

 

 

(9.7

)

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

1.3

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents

 

 

123.1

 

 

 

(31.8

)

 

 

58.1

 

Elimination of cash from discontinued operations

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

(0.5

)

Cash and equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

94.2

 

 

 

120.8

 

 

 

63.2

 

Cash and equivalents at end of year

 

$

217.8

 

 

$

94.2

 

 

$

120.8

 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

74.5

 

 

$

89.7

 

 

$

84.9

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

$

21.1

 

 

$

21.3

 

 

$

14.8

 

Cash received from income tax refunds

 

$

4.4

 

 

$

1.9

 

 

$

0.2

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


56 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

1. Organization

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. and its subsidiaries (also referred to in this report as “Ceridian,” “we,” “our,” and “us”) offer a broad range of services and software designed to help employers more effectively manage employment processes, such as payroll, payroll-related tax filing, human resource information systems, employee self-service, time and labor management, and recruitment and applicant screening. Our technology-based services are typically provided through long-term customer relationships that result in a high level of recurring revenue. OurWhile we operate in 18 countries globally, our operations are primarily located in the United States and Canada.

On April 30, 2018, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”), in which we issued and sold 21,000,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $22.00 per share. We granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase an additional 3,150,000 shares of common stock at the offering price, which was exercised in full. A total of 24,150,000 shares of common stock were issued in our IPO. Concurrently with our IPO, we issued an additional 4,545,455 shares of our common stock in a private placement at $22.00 per share. We received gross proceeds of $631.3 from the IPO and concurrent private placement before deducting underwriting discounts, commissions, and other offering related expenses.

The use of the proceeds from the IPO were as follows:

Gross proceeds

$

631.3

 

Less:

 

 

 

Underwriters' discount and commissions

 

29.2

 

IPO-related expenses

 

11.8

 

Redemption of 11% Senior Notes due 2021 (Note 9)

 

475.0

 

Call premium on redemption of 11% Senior Notes due 2021

 

13.1

 

Interest on redemption of 11% Senior Notes due 2021

 

10.9

 

Sponsor management fee

 

11.3

 

Debt refinancing expenses

 

11.4

 

Cash to balance sheet

$

68.6

 

On November 16, 2018, we completed a secondary offering, in which certain of our stockholders (the “Selling Stockholders”) sold 11,000,000 shares of common stock, in an underwritten public offering at $36.00 per share.  The Selling Stockholders granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase an additional 1,650,000 shares of common stock at the offering price, which was exercised in full.  A total of 12,650,000 shares of common stock were sold by the Selling Stockholders on November 16, 2018, with all proceeds going to the Selling Stockholders.  We incurred expenses of $1.3 during the year ended December 31, 2018, related to the secondary offering within selling, general and administrative expense.  

Prior to our IPO, Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. was primarily owned by Ceridian LLC (the “Parent”) and Ceridian Holding II LLC (“Ceridian Holding II”). The Parent was 100% owned by Foundation Holding LLC, which in turn was 100% owned by Ceridian Holding LLC (“Ceridian Holding”). The owners of Ceridian Holding and Ceridian Holding II included (i) affiliates and co-investors of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (“THL Partners”) and Cannae Holdings, LLC (“Cannae”) (THL Partners and Cannae are together referred to as the “Sponsors”), who collectively owned approximately 96% of the outstanding interests of both Ceridian Holding and Ceridian Holding II, and (ii) other individuals, who collectively owned approximately 4% of the outstanding interests of each holding company.

Subsequent to the IPO and concurrent private placement, we completed an internal corporate reorganization, pursuant to which the limited liability companies that held shares in us were merged with and into Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. At the time of these transactions, these limited liability companies had no assets other than equity interests in us or the other limited liability companies. As a result of these transactions, our previous, pre-IPO stockholders now hold shares of our common stock directly, rather than through a series of limited liability companies. These transactions had no impact on our assets, liabilities, or operations.


Our History

Ceridian was acquired in 2007 by affiliates and co-investors of the Sponsors (the “2007 Merger”). In April 2012, Ceridian acquired Dayforce Corporation, which had built Dayforce, a cloud HCM solution. In the months following the acquisition, Dayforce founder, David D. Ossip, was named Chief Executive Officer of Ceridian HCM, and shortly thereafter, we generally stopped actively selling our Bureau solutions to new customers in the United States to focus our resources on expanding the Dayforce platform and growing Cloud solutions.

As part of our strategy to focus on the growth of our Cloud solutions business, we undertook the following initiatives to simplify our business model:

(i) sold our consumer-directed benefit services business in 2013,

(ii) merged Comdata, our payment systems business unit, with FleetCor Technologies in 2014,

(iii) sold our benefits administration and post-employment compliance business in 2015,

(iv) sold our United Kingdom and Ireland Bureau businesses and a portion of our operations that supported such businesses in Mauritius in 2016, and

(v) contributed our LifeWorks employee assistance program business to a joint venture, LifeWorks, in 2016, then distributed our ownership in this joint venture to a holding company owned by our stockholders in April 2018.

As a result of these transactions, we only actively sell Dayforce and Powerpay, which we believe simplifies our business model and positions us well for continued growth.  Please refer to Note 3, “Discontinued Operations,” for further discussion of these transactions.  

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the operations and accounts of Ceridian and all subsidiaries, as well as any variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which we have controlling financial interest. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated from our consolidated financial statements.

We consolidate the grantor trusts that hold funds provided by our payroll and tax filing customers pending remittance to employees of those customers or tax authorities in the United States and Canada, although Ceridian does not own the grantor trusts. Under consolidation accounting, the enterprise with a controlling financial interest consolidates a VIE. A controlling financial interest in an entity is determined through analysis that identifies the primary beneficiary which has (1) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In addition, ongoing reassessments must be performed to confirm whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The grantor trusts are VIEs, and we are deemed to have a controlling financial interest as the primary beneficiary. Please refer to Note 5, “Customer Trust Funds,” for further information on our accounting for these funds.

Reverse Stock Split

On April 10, 2018, we effected a 1-for-2 reverse stock split of our common stock. All of the common share and per share information referenced throughout the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse stock split.


Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and our reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates that could significantly affect our results of operations or financial condition include the assignment of fair values to goodwill and other intangible assets and testing for impairment; the testing of impairment of long-lived assets; the determination of our liability for pensions and postretirement benefits; the determination of fair value of stock optionsequity awards granted; and the resolution of tax matters and legal contingencies. Further discussion on these estimates can be found in related disclosures elsewhere in our notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Equivalents

As of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2017,2020, cash and equivalents were comprised of cash held in bank accounts and investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

57 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Concentrations

Cash deposits of client and corporate funds are maintained primarily in large credit-worthy financial institutions in the countries in which we operate. These deposits may exceed the amount of any deposit insurance that may be available through government agencies. All deliverable securities are held in custody with large credit-worthy financial institutions, which bear the risk of custodial loss. Non-deliverable securities, primarily money market securities, are held in custody by large, credit-worthy broker-dealers and financial institutions.

Trade and Other Receivables, Net

Trade and other receivables balances are presented on the consolidated balance sheets net of the allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.3$3.9 million and $1.3$3.1 million and the reserve for sales adjustments of $3.8$4.0 million and $4.7$4.4 million as of December 31, 20182021, and 2017,2020, respectively. We experience credit losses on accounts receivable and, accordingly, must make estimates related to the ultimate collection of the receivables. Specifically, management analyzes accounts receivable, historical bad debt experience, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We estimate the reserve for sales adjustment based on historical sales adjustment experience. We write off accounts receivable when we determine that the accounts are uncollectible, generally upon customer bankruptcy or the customer’s nonresponse to continued collection efforts.

Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net

Our property, plant, and equipment assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the remaining lease term or estimated useful life of the related assets, which are generally as follows:

 

Buildings

40 years

Building improvements

5 years

Machinery and equipment

4-64-6 years

Computer equipment

3-43-4 years


Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. We capitalized interest of $0.5$0.4 million and $0.6$0.5 million in property, plant, and equipment, net during the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. Property, plant, and equipment assets are assessed for impairment as described under the heading “ImpairmentImpairment of Long-Lived Assets”Assets below.

Business Combinations

AssignmentIn accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic805, Business Combinations, we use the acquisition method of Fair Values Upon Acquisitionaccounting and allocate the fair value of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Inpurchase consideration to the event of a business combination where we are the acquiring party, we are required to assign fair values to all identifiable assets acquired and liabilities acquired, including intangible assets, such as customer lists, identifiable intangible trademarks, technology and non-compete agreement. We are also required to determine the useful life for definite-lived identifiable intangible assets acquired. These determinations require significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions; and, when material amounts are involved, we generally utilize the assistance of third-party valuation consultants. The remainder of the purchase price of the acquired business not assigned to identifiable assets or liabilities is then recorded as goodwill.

In conjunction with the 2007 Merger, affiliates of the Sponsors completed the acquisition of all outstanding equity of the Ceridian entities. Although Parent continued as the same legal entity after the 2007 Merger, the application of push down accounting representing the termination of the old accounting entity and the creation of a new one resulted in the adjustment of all net assets toassumed based on their respective estimated fair values as of the 2007 Merger. Net assetsacquisition date. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase consideration transferred over the estimated fair value of the Parent were adjusted to their respectiveidentifiable net assets acquired in a business combination.

Assigning estimated fair values which included goodwill, trademarks, customer lists,to the net assets acquired requires the use of significant estimates, judgments, inputs, and assumptions regarding the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are generally based on available historical information, independent valuations or appraisals, future expectations, and assumptions determined to be reasonable but are inherently uncertain with respect to future events, including economic conditions, competition, the useful life of the acquired assets, and other intangible assets.factors. We may refine the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, if necessary, over a period not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition. The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the estimated useful life and depreciation or amortization method of each asset, can materially impact the net earnings of the periods subsequent to the acquisition through depreciation and amortization, and in certain instancesthrough impairment charges, if the asset becomes impaired in the future. During the measurement period, any purchase price allocation changes that impact the carrying value of goodwill affects any measurement of goodwill impairment taken during the measurement period, if applicable. If necessary, purchase price allocation

58 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

revisions that occur outside of the measurement period are recorded within our consolidated statement of operations depending on the nature of the adjustment.

Refer to Note 3, “Business Combinations”, for additional information regarding our accounting for recent business combinations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill, which represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired, is assigned to reporting units based on the benefits derived from the acquisition. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles are not amortized against earnings, but instead are subject to impairment review on at least an annual basis. We perform our annual assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible balances as of October 1 of each year. There was no indication of impairment at October 1, 2018.

We assess goodwill impairment risk by first performing a qualitative review of entity-specific, industry, market, and general economic factors for each reporting unit. If significant potential goodwill impairment risk exists for a specific reporting unit, we apply a quantitative test. The quantitative test comparescomparing the reporting unit’s estimated fair value with its carrying amount. In estimating fair value of our reporting units, we use a combination of the income approach and the market-based approach. A number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in determining the current fair value of the net assets with the carrying amount of the reporting units, including operating cash flows, markets and market share, sales volumes and prices, and working capital changes.unit. We consider historical experience and all available information atdetermine the time the fair values of our reporting units are estimated. However, fair values that could be realized in an actual transaction may differ from those used to evaluate the goodwill for impairment. The evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of the reporting unit tobased on our market capitalization at the testing date. If the carrying amount.amount of the goodwill exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, goodwill may be impaired. To the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, an impairment loss is recognized.

Intangible assets represent amounts assigned to specifically identifiable intangible assets at the time of an acquisition. Definite-lived assets are amortized on a straight-line basis generally over the following periods:

Customer lists and relationships

5-154-12 years

TechnologyTrade name

3-43-5 years

Technology

3-5 years

Indefinite-lived intangible assets, which consist of trade names, are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if certain events or circumstances occur that could indicate impairment. When evaluating whether the indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired, we first perform a qualitative review. If the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the carrying amount, a quantitative test is applied and, the carrying amount is compared to its estimated fair value. The estimate of fair value is based on a relief from royalty method which calculates the cost savings associated with owning rather than licensing the trademark.trade name. An estimated royalty rate is applied to forecasted revenue and the resulting cash flows are discounted. Definite-lived assets are assessed for impairment as described under the heading “Impairment“Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” below.


Internally Developed Software Costs

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)ASC Topic 350, we capitalize costs associated with software developed or obtained for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed and our management has authorized further funding for the project, which it deems probable of completion. Capitalized software costs include only: (1) external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining the software; (2) payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with and who devote time to the project; and (3) interest costs incurred while developing the software. Capitalization of these costs ceases no later than the point at which the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended purpose. We do not include general and administrative costs and overhead costs in capitalizable costs. We charge researchResearch and development costs, product management, and other software maintenance costs related to software development to earningsare expensed as incurred.

We had capitalized software costs, net of accumulated amortization, of $61.9$92.8 million and $56.4$78.7 million as of December 31, 20182021, and 2017,2020, respectively, included in property, plant, and equipment, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We amortize software costs on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the software, generally a range of two to seven years.years. Amortization of software costs totaled $26.2, $23.6,$37.0 million, $30.6 million, and $20.9$28.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, capitalized software, and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying

59 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of asset groups to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group.

Deferred Costs

Deferred costs primarily consist of deferred sales commissions. Sales commissions paid based on the annual contract value of a signed customer contract are considered incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a contract with a customer. Sales commissions paid based on the annual contract value are deferred and then amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of benefit that we have determined to be five years.

Deferred costs included within Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets were $144.5 million and $132.9 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Amortization expense for the deferred costs was $46.4 million, $38.8 million, and $32.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

We recognizeThe core principle of ASC Topic 606 is that revenue fromis recognized upon transfer of control of promised products or services to customers in an amount that reflects the sale of our services, net of applicable sales taxes, whenconsideration we expect to receive in exchange for those products or services. In accordance with ASC Topic 606, we perform the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3)steps to determine revenue to be recognized:

1)
Identify the seller’scontract(s) with a customer;
2)
Identify the performance obligations in the contract;
3)
Determine the transaction price;
4)
Allocate the transaction price to the buyer is fixed or determinable;performance obligations in the contract; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. We rely on
5)
Recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a signed contract with the customer as the persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement.

performance obligation.

We enter into revenue arrangements that may consist of multiple deliverables based on the needsThe significant majority of our customers. For example, our services address a broad range of employment process needs, such as payroll, payroll-related tax filing, human resource information, employee self-service capabilities, time and labor management, and recruitment and applicant screening. A customer arrangement may contain any of these elements with different elements delivered across multiple reporting periods.

We have a single unit of accounting for each deliverable in a contract based on the use of estimated selling price (“ESP”) in those cases where vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”) or third party evidence (“TPE”) cannot be established. Our determination of ESP involves the consideration of several factors based on the specific facts and circumstances of each contract. Specifically, we consider the cost to produce or to provide the deliverable, the anticipated margin on that deliverable, the selling price and profit margin for similar services, the value of any enhancements that have been built into the deliverable and the characteristics of the varying markets in which the deliverable will be sold.

When we are unable to establish a selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use ESP in the allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis.

We regularly review VSOE, TPE, and ESP and maintain internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates. There were no material impacts during the period nor do we currently expect a material impact in the near term from changes in VSOE, TPE, or ESP.


Deferredtwo major revenue primarily consists of customer billings in advance of revenues being recognized from our contracts. Deferred revenue also includes certain deferred professional services fees that are accounted for as a single unit of accounting with subscription fees and are recognized as revenues over the same period as the related customer contract. Deferred revenue that is anticipated to be recognized during the succeeding twelve-month period is recorded as current deferred revenue and the remaining portion is recorded as noncurrent.

Recurring Services Revenues

Revenues are presented within the consolidated statements of operations in two categories: recurring services,sources (recurring and professional services and other.other) are derived from contracts with customers. Recurring revenues are primarily related to our cloud subscription performance obligations. Professional services and other revenues are primarily related to professional services for our cloud customers (including implementation services to activate new accounts, as well as post go-live professional services typically billed on a time and materials basis) and, to a much lesser extent, fees for other non-recurring services, including sales of time clocks and certain client reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses. Fees charged to cloud subscription performance obligations are generally priced either on a per-employee, per-month (“PEPM”) basis for a given month or on a per-employee, per-process basis for a given process; and fees charged for professional services are typically priced on a fixed fee basis for activating new accounts and on a time and materials basis for post go-live professional services. There is typically no variable consideration related to our recurring cloud subscriptions or our activation services, nor do they include a significant financing component, non-cash consideration, or consideration payable to a customer. Our recurring cloud subscriptions are typically billed one month in advance while our professional services are billed over the implementation period for activation of new accounts and as work is performed for post go-live professional services.

Our cloud services arrangements include multiple performance obligations, and transaction price allocations are based on the stand-alone selling price ("SSP") for each performance obligation. Our contract renewal rates serve as an observable input to establish SSP for our recurring cloud subscription performance obligations. The SSP for professional services performance obligations is estimated based on market conditions and observable inputs, including rates charged by third parties to perform implementation services.

For our performance obligations, the consideration allocated to cloud subscription revenues is recognized as recurring revenues, typically commencing when an instance is provisioned to the customer. The consideration allocated to professional services to activate a new account is recognized as professional services revenues consistbased on the proportion of monthly fees that we charge for our Cloud and Bureau solutions. total work performed, using reasonably dependable estimates (in relation to progression through the implementation phase), by solution.

60 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Recurring Revenues

For our Dayforce solutions, we primarily charge monthly recurring fees on a per employee, per month (“PEPM”) basis, generally one-month in advance of service, based on the number and type of solutions provided to the customer and the number of employees at the customer. We charge Powerpay customers monthly recurring fees on a per-employee, per-process basis. For our Bureau solutions, we typically charge monthly recurring fees on a per-process basis. The typical recurring services customer contract has an initial term of between three years. The initial recurring services contracts have general acceptance criteria that consist of the completion of user acceptance testing. and five years. Any credits related to service level commitments are recognized as incurred, as service level failures are not anticipated at contract signing. Should a customer cancel the initial contract, an early termination fee may be applicable, and revenue is recognized upon collection. We also generate recurring services revenue from investment income on our Cloud and Bureau customer funds held in trust before such funds are remitted to taxing authorities, customer employees, or other third parties. We refer to this investment income as float revenue. Please refer to Note 17, “Financial Data by Segment and Geographic Area,12, “Revenue, for a full description of our sources of revenue.

Professional Services and Other Revenues

Professional services and other revenues consist primarily of charges relating to the work performed to assist customers with the planning, design, implementation, and stagingimplementation of their solutions. Also included in professional services are any related training services, post-implementation professional services, and shipment of time clocks purchased time clocks.by customers. We also generate professional services and other revenues from custom professional services and consulting services that we provide and for certain third-party services that we arrange for our Bureau customers. Professional services revenue is primarily recognized as hours are incurred.

Costs and Expenses

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists of costs to deliver our revenue-producing services. Most of these costs are recognized as incurred, that is, as we become obligated to pay for them. Some costs of revenue are recognized in the period that a service is sold and delivered. Other costs of revenue are recognized over the period of use or in proportion to the related revenue.

The costs recognized as incurred consist primarily of customer service staff costs, customer technical support costs, implementation personnel costs, costs of hosting applications, consulting and purchased services, delivery services, and royalties. The costs of revenue recognized over the period of use are depreciation and amortization, rentals of facilities and equipment, and direct and incremental costs associated with deferred implementation service revenue.

Cost of recurring services revenues primarily consists of costs to provide maintenance and technical support to our customers, and the costs of hosting our applications. The cost of recurring services revenues includes compensation and other employee-related expenses for data center staff, payments to outside service providers, data center, and networking expenses.

Cost of professional services and other revenues primarily consists of costs to provide implementation consulting services and training to our customers, as well as the cost of time clocks. Costs to provide implementation consulting services include compensation and other employee-related expenses for professional services staff, costs of subcontractors, and travel.

Product development and management expense includes costs related to software development activities that do not qualify for capitalization, such as development, quality assurance, testing of new technologies, and enhancements to our existing solutions that do not result in additional functionality. Product development and management expense also includes costs related to the management of our service offerings.solutions. Research and development expense, which is included within product development and management expense, was $29.6, $19.0,$81.1 million, $39.6 million, and $13.0$34.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively.


Depreciation and amortization related to cost of revenue primarily consists of amortization of capitalized software.

61 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Selling, General, and Administrative Expense

Selling expense includes costs related to maintaining a direct marketing infrastructure and sales force and other direct marketing efforts, such as marketing events, advertising, telemarketing, direct mail, and trade shows. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was $5.8, $5.6,$7.5 million, $5.5 million, and $5.9$5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively.

General and administrative expense includes costs that are not directly related to delivery of services, selling efforts, or product development, primarily consisting of corporate-level costs, such as administration, finance, legal, and human resources. Also included in this category are depreciation, and amortization of other intangible assets not reflected in cost of revenue, and the provision for doubtful accounts receivable, and net periodic pension costs.receivable.

Other Expense (Income), Net

Other (Income) Expense, Net

Otherexpense (income) expense,, net includes the results of transactions that are not appropriately classified in another category. These items are primarily foreign currency translation gains and losses resulting mainly from intercompany receivables and payablestransactions denominated in foreign currencies other than the subsidiary’s functional currency, environmental reserve charges, and charges related to the impairment of asset values.net periodic pension costs.

Income Taxes

Income taxes have been provided for using the asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires an asset and liability based approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities as adjusted for the expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss carryforwards. The impact on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates and laws, if any, applied to the years during which temporary differences are expected to be settled, is reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period of enactment.

We classify interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of the income tax provision.expense (benefit).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash and equivalents, trade and other receivables, net, customer trust funds, customer trust funds obligations, customer advance payments, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these items.

Share-Based Compensation

Our employees participate in share-based compensation plans. Under the fair value recognition provisions of share-based compensation accounting, we measure share-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognize the compensation expense over the requisite service period, which is the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award.

We use the Black-Scholes standard option pricing model (“Black-Scholes model”) to determine the fair value of stock optionsawards with term-based vesting conditions. The determination of the fair value of the awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model is affected by the value of our common stock as well as other inputs and assumptions described below. Prior to our IPO, the value of our common stock was determined by the Board of Directors with assistance from a third-party valuation expert.

If factors change and we employ different assumptions for estimating share-based compensation expense in future periods or if we adopt a different valuation model, the future periods may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period and could materially affect our operating results.


To determine the fair value of both term- and certain performance-based stock options,awards, the risk-free interest rate used was based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with remaining term equal to the contractual term of the performance-based options and the expected term of the term-based options.awards. Given our limited history as a public company, the estimated volatility of our common stock is based on volatility data for selected comparable public companies over the expected term of our stock options.awards. Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, we use an expected dividend yield of zero. The amount of share-based compensation expense we recognize during a period is based on the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest.

62 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

For performance-based stock options with a market condition, a Monte Carlo simulation model is used to determine the fair value. The Monte Carlo model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market conditions stipulated in the award.

We estimate option forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We analyze historical data to estimate pre-vesting forfeitures and record share-based compensation expense for those awards expected to vest. We recognize term-based stock compensation expense using the straight-line method.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Liability

We present information about our pension and postretirement benefit plans in Note 10, “Employee Benefit Plans” to our consolidated financial statements, “Employee Benefit Plans.”statements. Liabilities and expenses for pensions and other postretirement benefits are determined with the assistance of third-party actuaries, using actuarial methodologies and incorporating significant assumptions, including the rate used to discount the future estimated liability, the long-term rate of return on plan assets, and several assumptions relating to the employee workforce (medical costs, retirement age, and mortality). The discount rate assumption utilizes a full yield curve approach by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. The impact of a change in the discount rate of 25 basis points would be approximately $12$11 million on the liabilities and $0.1$0.2 million on pre-tax earnings in the following year. The long-term rate of return is estimated by considering historical returns and expected returns on current and projected asset allocations and is generally applied to a five-year average market value of assets. A change in the assumption for the long-term rate of return on plan assets of 25 basis points would impact pre-tax earnings by approximately $1$1 million. At December 31, 2017, we updated our mortality assumptions utilizing an improvement scale issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2017, which resulted in a $6.0 million reduction in the projected benefit obligation. At December 31, 2018, we updated our mortality assumptions utilizing an improvement scale issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2018, which resulted in a $1.5 million reduction in the projected benefit obligation.

Foreign Currency Translation

We have international operations whereby the local currencies serve as functional currencies. We translate foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities at the end-of-period exchange rates and foreign currency denominated statements of operations at the weighted-averageaverage exchange rates for each period. We report the effect of changes in the U.S. dollar carrying values of assets and liabilities of our international subsidiaries that are due to changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the subsidiaries’ functional currency as foreign currency translation within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses from transactions and translation of assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the subsidiaries are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations within other (income) expense (income), net.

63 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014,

Standard

Issuance Date

Description

Adoption Date

Effect on the Financial Statements

Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740)

December 2019

These amendments simplify the accounting for income taxes, eliminates certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and clarifies certain aspects of the current guidance to improve consistent application among reporting entities.

January 2021

The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2021-08,Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers

October 2021

This amendment requires an acquirer to account for revenue contracts acquired in a business combination in accordance with Topic 606, Revenue From Contracts with Customers, as if it had originated the contracts.

October 2021

The adoption of this standard resulted in an increase to deferred revenue on Ascender's opening balance sheet of $2.7 million and Ideal's opening balance sheet of $0.2 million. Additionally, the adoption resulted in the recognition of $2.8 million of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021.

ASU 2018-14, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20), Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans

August 2018

This amendment modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. Additionally, it removes disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial, adds disclosures identified as relevant, and clarifies certain specific requirements of disclosures to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to the financial statements.

January 2020

The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our annual defined benefit plan and other postretirement plan disclosures.

ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Statements

June 2016

This amendment replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses on instruments within its scope, including trade receivables. This is intended to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses.

January 2020

The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40)

August 2020

This amendment simplifies the accounting for convertible instruments by removing certain separation models required under current GAAP for (1) convertible debt with a cash conversion feature and (2) convertible instruments with a beneficial conversion feature. As a result, a convertible debt instrument will be accounted for as a single liability measured at its amortized cost.

January 2022

We plan to adopt the guidance as of January 1, 2022, using the modified retrospective method of transition. The adoption will result in the elimination of the debt discount (and related deferred tax liability) that was recorded within equity related to our Convertible Senior Notes. The net impact of the adjustments will be recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings and additional paid in capital. Preliminarily, we expect the impact to the consolidated balance sheet as follows: (1) increase of $92.9 million to long-term debt, (2) decrease of $77.7 million to additional paid-in capital, net of allocated issuance costs of $2.7 million and deferred tax impact of $28.2 million, and (3) increase to retained earnings of $13.6 million.

ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting

March 2020

This amendment provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform.

Not yet adopted

This amendment may be elected over time through December 31, 2022 as reference rate reform activities occur. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

64 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

3. Business Combinations

Ascender

On March 1, 2021, we completed the Financial Accounting Standards Boardpurchase of 100% of the outstanding shares of Ascender HCM Pty Limited (“FASB”Ascender”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”for $359.6 million. Ascender is a payroll and human resources solutions provider in the Asia Pacific Japan ("APJ") No. 2014-09, “Revenueregion. We entered into a forward foreign currency contract to hedge the purchase price for the Ascender acquisition which was denominated in Australian dollars, resulting in the recognition of a realized gain of $4.2 million included as a component of other expense, net in our consolidated statement of operations.

The financial results of Ascender have been included within our consolidated financial statements from Contractsthe acquisition date forward and are classified among both Cloud and Bureau solutions. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, Ascender revenue included within our consolidated statement of operations was $73.3 million. The purchase accounting was considered complete as of December 31, 2021. The intangible assets consist of $76.5 million of customer relationships, $55.0 million of developed technology, and $6.5 million of trade name. Of the goodwill associated with Customers,” which replaced all existing revenue guidance created by ASC Topic 605, including prescriptive industry-specific guidance,this acquisition, 0 amount is deductible for income tax purposes. The goodwill of $242.8 million arising from the Ascender acquisition is primarily attributable to the synergies to enable both multi-national customers and created ASC Topic 606 for revenuecustomers within the APJ region to leverage one global HCM platform, Dayforce, as well as the assembled workforce of Ascender.

The major classes of assets and ASC Subtopic 340-40 for incremental costs of obtaining a contract with customers. This standard’s core principle is that an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the considerationliabilities to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Entities will need to apply more judgment and make more estimates than under the previous guidance. In July 2015 the FASB deferred the effective date for all entities by one year, making the guidance for non-public companies effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. As an emerging growth company, we have electedallocated the purchase price were as follows:

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cash and equivalents

$

5.1

 

Restricted cash

 

2.0

 

Trade receivables, prepaid expenses, and other current assets

 

16.0

 

Customer funds

 

18.9

 

Property, plant, and equipment

 

13.1

 

Goodwill

 

242.8

 

Other intangible assets

 

138.0

 

Other assets

 

18.8

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

(33.4

)

Customer funds obligations

 

(18.8

)

Other non-current liabilities

 

(42.9

)

Total purchase price

$

359.6

 

Ideal

On April 30, 2021, we completed the purchase of 100% of the outstanding shares of O5 Systems, Inc. dba Ideal (“Ideal”) for $41.4 million. Ideal is a talent intelligence software provider based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The financial results of Ideal have been included within our consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date forward and are classified as a Cloud solution. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, Ideal revenue included within our consolidated statement of operations was $2.9 million. The purchase accounting was considered complete as of December 31, 2021. The intangible assets consist of $18.0 million of

65 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

developed technology, $0.2 million of trade name, and $0.1 million of customer relationships. Of the goodwill associated with this acquisition, 0 amount is deductible for income tax purposes.

The major classes of assets and liabilities to followwhich we have allocated the non-public company timelinepurchase price were as follows:

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cash and equivalents

$

2.6

 

Trade receivables, prepaid expenses, and other current assets

 

1.0

 

Property, plant, and equipment

 

0.1

 

Goodwill

 

26.3

 

Other intangible assets

 

18.3

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

(3.8

)

Other non-current liabilities

 

(3.1

)

Total purchase price

$

41.4

 

DataFuzion

On October 4, 2021, we completed the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities of DataFuzion HCM, Inc. (“DataFuzion”) for adopting this guidance.$12.5 million in cash consideration and future contingent consideration payments. The standard permitsasset purchase agreement allows the usesellers to receive additional payments based on 1) the go live of eitherDataFuzion’s payroll processing solution for a certain customer (“Milestone Payment”) and 2) qualifying annualized recurring revenue ("ARR") performance generated from DataFuzion's solution at each measurement date (“Earn-out Payments”, collectively with the retrospective transition method or modified retrospective approachMilestone Payment, the “Contingent Consideration Payments”). The Milestone Payment will not exceed a payout of $2.5 million whereas the Earn-out Payments are performance based and do not have an established maximum payout. The earn-out will be measured and subsequently paid annually as of June 30, with a cumulative effect recognizedthe first measurement in 2023 and the final measurement in 2026. The fair value of the Contingent Consideration Payments was $5.4 million at the date of initial application. Management has decidedacquisition and $6.0 million at December 31, 2021. Due to adopt the new standard effective in the first quarter of 2019, using the retrospective transition method for adoption.


In preparation for this adoption, we have evaluated the impactremeasurement of the new standard to our financial statements and accompanying disclosures inContingent Consideration Payments, we recognized $0.6 million of expense for the notes to our consolidated financial statements. Our assessment of the impact included an evaluation of the five-step process set forth in the new standard along with the enhancement of disclosures that will be required. We executed a plan for implementing the standard, which included identifying customer contractsthree months ended December 31, 2021 within the scope of the new standard, identifying performance obligations within those customer contracts, and evaluating the impact of incremental variable consideration paid to obtain those customer contracts. We also undertook a comprehensive review of all contracts that fall under the scope of the new standard; and, as of the date of this report, we have completed our review of in-scope contracts.

Based on our analysis, the adoption of the new standard will result in changes to the classification and timing of our revenue recognition. Specifically, revenue classified as professional services and other revenue will increase and revenue classified as recurring services revenue will be reduced under the new standard, compared to current GAAP. Further, the new standard will result in changes to the timing of our revenue recognition compared to current GAAP. In compliance with the new standard, a contract asset will be reflected on the consolidated balance sheets and will be amortized over the contract period, which is generally three years. We also will have changes to the timing of certain selling, general, and administrative expenses,expense in our consolidated statements of operations.

The purchase accounting has been finalized as of December 31, 2021 and we have allocated the new standard requires capitalizingpurchase price of $17.9 million as follows: $15.6 million to goodwill and amortizing certain selling expenses, such as commissions and bonuses paid$2.3 million to developed technology. Of the sales force. These sales expenses will be amortized overgoodwill associated with this acquisition, $10.2 million is deductible for income tax purposes.

ADAM HCM

On December 3, 2021, we completed the periodacquisition of benefit, generally five years. Additionally, the adoption100% of the new standard will have an immaterial impact on costoutstanding interests in ATI ROW, LLC and ADAM HCM MEXICO, S. de R.L. de C.V. (collectively, "ADAM HCM") for $34.3 million. ADAM HCM is a payroll and HCM company in Latin America.

The purchase accounting has not been finalized as of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017, as a small number2021. Provisional amounts relate to final purchase price adjustments, specifically the net working capital, and tax positions. We expect to finalize the allocation of the purchase price within the one-year measurement period following the acquisition. Intangible assets recorded for this acquisition consist of $7.5 million of customer contracts had previously been recognized under revenue guidance prior to ASC Topic 605.  relationships, $2.9 million of developed technology, and $0.4 million of trade name. Of the goodwill associated with this acquisition, $23.5 million is deductible for income tax purposes.

In periods66 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of revenue growth, the changes above will result in higher overall earnings before income taxes and net income when compared to current GAAP.Contents

The following tables present the impacts that the adoptionmajor classes of ASC 606 would have on the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

As Reported

 

 

Under ASC 606

 

 

Impact

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

652.5

 

 

$

625.0

 

 

$

(27.5

)

Professional services and other

 

 

93.9

 

 

 

115.7

 

 

 

21.8

 

Total revenue

 

$

746.4

 

 

$

740.7

 

 

$

(5.7

)

Operating profit

 

$

52.8

 

 

$

56.3

 

 

$

3.5

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

As Reported

 

 

Under ASC 606

 

 

Impact

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring services

 

$

598.5

 

 

$

573.9

 

 

$

(24.6

)

Professional services and other

 

 

72.3

 

 

 

102.3

 

 

 

30.0

 

Total revenue

 

$

670.8

 

 

$

676.2

 

 

$

5.4

 

Operating profit

 

$

33.0

 

 

$

46.6

 

 

$

13.6

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases,” which created ASC Topic 842 and is intended to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities onto which we have preliminarily allocated the balance sheet and by disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. This standard requires balance sheet recognition for both finance leases and operating leases. This guidance is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity will, in effect, continue to account for leases that commence beforepurchase price were as follows:

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cash and equivalents

$

0.2

 

Trade receivables, prepaid expenses, and other current assets

 

1.1

 

Goodwill

 

23.5

 

Other intangible assets

 

10.8

 

Other assets

 

0.2

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

(1.5

)

Total purchase price

$

34.3

 

Excelity

On May 29, 2020, we completed the effective date in accordance with previous GAAP unless the lease is modified, except that lessees are required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all operating leases at each reporting date based on the present valuepurchase of 100% of the remaining minimum rental payments that were tracked and disclosed under previous GAAP. Management will adopt this guidance beginningoutstanding shares of Excelity Global Solutions Pte. Ltd. (“Excelity”) for $77.2 million in cash consideration. Excelity is a human capital management service provider in the first quarterAPJ region.

The financial results of 2019, and has chosen to take advantage of the additional transition method in ASU No. 2018-11 discussed below, in which a cumulative-effect adjustment will be made to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.  Currently, based on management’s implementation efforts, we will recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the consolidated balance sheets as of January 1, 2019, in the range of $35.0 to $45.0.  


In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows—Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice of certain cash receipts and cash payments. This guidance is effective for non-public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periodsExcelity have been included within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We have chosen to early adopt this guidance as of January 1, 2018, and have applied this guidance to the presentation of our debt refinancing transactions that occurred during 2018.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income,” which is in response to a narrow-scope financial reporting issue that arose because of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The amendment in this update allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This amendment is intended to improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users by requiring certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. The amendment in this update is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management will adopt this guidance beginning in the first quarter of 2019.  We anticipate the adoption of this guidance will not have a significant impact on our consolidated balance sheets.  

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases” and 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements.” The amendments in ASU No. 2018-10 affect narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU No. 2016-02. For non-early adopters, this amendment is effective under the same timelines as ASU No. 2016-02. The amendments in ASU No. 2018-11 provide entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new lease requirements. Under the additional transition method, entities may initially apply the requirements by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The amendments in this update also provide lessors with a practical alternative to separate non-lease components from the associated lease component. Under this alternative, lessors may account for those components as a single component if the non-lease components otherwise would be accounted for under the new revenue guidance (Topic 606) and certain other criteria are met. For entities that have not adopted Topic 842 before the issuance of this update, the effective date and transition requirements are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in ASU No. 2016-02. As discussed above, management has chosen to take advantage of the additional transition method created by this guidance and will record a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption, which will be the first quarter of 2019.  

3. Discontinued Operations

Life Works Disposition

On March 1, 2016, we entered into a strategic joint venture with WorkAngel Technology Limited (“WorkAngel”) in which we contributed our existing LifeWorks employee assistance program business to WorkAngel Organisation Limited, a newly formed English limited company. On January 20, 2017, WorkAngel Organisation Limited changed its name to LifeWorks Corporation Ltd (“LifeWorks”). We had a controlling interest in LifeWorks, including certain preferential distribution rights; therefore, LifeWorks was consolidated within our financial statements, and the other joint venture ownership interest component was presented as a noncontrolling interest. During the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, there were losses attributable to the noncontrolling interest of $0.5 and $1.3, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2016, there was income attributable to the noncontrolling interest of $0.1.

In the second quarter of 2018, contemporaneously with our IPO and concurrent private placement, we distributed our controlling financial interest in LifeWorks to our stockholders of record prior to the IPO on a pro rata basis in accordance with their pro rata interest in us (the “LifeWorks Disposition”).

The LifeWorks Disposition represented a strategic shift in our overall business and had a significant impact on the financial statement results. Therefore, the LifeWorks business has been presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements from the acquisition date forward and accompanying notes for all periods presented. Ceridian’s net book value related to LifeWorks of $95.7 was recordedare classified as a distribution through additional paidBureau solution. Intangible assets recorded for this acquisition consist of $14.8 million of customer relationships, $3.5 million of trade name, and $2.4 million of developed technology. The purchase accounting was complete as of December 31, 2020. Of the goodwill associated with this acquisition, $5.1 million is deductible for income tax purposes.

The major classes of assets and liabilities to which we allocated the purchase price were as follows:

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cash and equivalents

$

6.6

 

Trade receivables, prepaid expenses, and other current assets

 

13.0

 

Customer trust funds

 

12.3

 

Property, plant, and equipment and other assets

 

4.2

 

Goodwill

 

42.7

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

20.7

 

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

 

(2.2

)

Customer trust funds obligations

 

(13.1

)

Other non-current liabilities

 

(7.0

)

Total purchase price

$

77.2

 

The acquisition of Ascender, Ideal, DataFuzion, ADAM HCM, and Excelity were recorded using the acquisition method of accounting, in capital within our consolidated balance sheet during the second quarter of 2018.


The amounts in the table below reflect the operating results of LifeWorks reported as discontinued operations, as well as supplemental disclosures of the discontinued operations:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net revenues

 

$

28.3

 

 

$

79.9

 

 

$

80.8

 

(Loss) income from operations before income taxes

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

7.1

 

Income tax expense

 

 

(24.9

)

 

 

(4.9

)

 

 

(11.1

)

Loss from discontinued operations, net of

   income taxes

 

$

(25.8

)

 

$

(5.3

)

 

$

(4.0

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

1.4

 

 

$

4.1

 

 

$

4.1

 

Capital expenditures

 

$

 

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

0.3

 

The amounts in the table below reflectwhich the assets and liabilities reportedassumed are recognized at their fair value. Additionally, after consideration of these acquisitions, management has concluded that we continue to have 1 operating and reportable segment. This conclusion aligns with how management monitors operating performance, allocates resources, and deploys capital. Pro forma financial information is not presented as discontinued operations for LifeWorks:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents

 

$

5.4

 

Trade and other receivables, net

 

 

13.3

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

1.5

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net

 

 

1.8

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

 

5.9

 

Goodwill

 

 

126.3

 

Other assets

 

 

2.0

 

Assets of discontinued operations

 

$

156.2

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

4.4

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

2.8

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

1.2

 

Other liabilities

 

 

10.9

 

Liabilities of discontinued operations

 

$

19.3

 

Salenone of UK Business

On June 15, 2016, we completed the stock sale of our United Kingdom and Ireland businesses, along with the portion of our Mauritius operations that supported these businesses (the “UK Business”). We received $93.2 in connection with this transaction. Concurrent with this transaction, we entered into a strategic partnership with the acquirer, SD Worx, a leading European provider of payroll and HCM services, to deliver cloud human capital management (“HCM”) services across Europe.

This transaction represented a strategic shift in our overall business and hadacquisitions qualified as a significant impact on our financial statement results. Therefore, the UK Business has been presented as discontinued operationsbusiness combination individually or in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for all periods presented. The sale of the UK Business, which made up the International reporting unit, was considered a sale of a business, and as such, the entire goodwill balance assigned to the International reporting unit of $23.8 was included in the carrying amount used in determining the gain on sale of the UK Business. During the year ended December 31, 2017, there was a settlement payment made to SD Worx.aggregate.


The amounts in the table below reflect the operating results of the UK Business reported as discontinued operations, as well as supplemental disclosures of the discontinued operations:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net revenues

 

$

 

 

$

37.0

 

Income from operations before income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

(Loss) gain on sale of businesses

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

5.9

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of

   income taxes

 

$

(1.0

)

 

$

6.6

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

 

 

$

1.3

 

Capital expenditures

 

$

 

 

$

0.7

 

Sale of Divested Benefits Continuation Businesses

In the third quarter of 2013, we entered into an agreement for the sale of certain of our customer contracts for consumer-directed benefit services, including flexible spending accounts, health reimbursement accounts, health savings accounts, commuter (parking or transit) premium-only plans, and tuition reimbursement plans (collectively, the “Consumer-Directed Benefit Services”). During the third quarter of 2015, we completed two separate transactions that resulted in the sale of our benefits administration and post-employment health insurance portability compliance businesses (the “Divested Benefits Continuation Businesses”).

These three transactions represented a strategic shift in our overall business and had a significant impact on our financial statement results. Accordingly, the Divested Benefits Continuation Businesses, as well as the Consumer-Directed Benefit Services, have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for all periods presented. The amounts in the table below reflect the operating results and gain on sale of the Divested Benefits Continuation Businesses reported as discontinued operations, as well as supplemental disclosures of the discontinued operations:

The purchase price of the Consumer-Directed Benefit Services was subject to adjustment, dependent upon which customers transitioned to the acquirer. Since a portion of the customer contracts were assigned to the acquirer on the sale date, that portion of the purchase price was recognized upon the sale date. For the remaining contracts that required transition, the purchase price was deferred and recognized as each contract transferred.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net revenues

 

$

 

 

$

4.8

 

Loss from operations before income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

(0.8

)

Gain on sale of businesses

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

21.0

 

Income tax expense

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(10.3

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of

   income taxes

 

$

0.3

 

 

$

9.9

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

 

 

$

 

Capital expenditures

 

$

 

 

$

 

For both sales of the Divested Benefits Continuation Businesses, consideration received was contingent upon the number and dollar value of successful customer transitions and was recorded when earned. Proceeds of $21.0 were received and earned based on the customers transitioned during the years ended December 31, 2016. The proceeds received during the year ended December 31, 2017, were for a final purchase price true-up related to one of the transactions.

The remaining liabilities related to discontinued operations for the Divested Benefits Continuation Businesses as of December 31, 2018, and 2017, were $0.2 and $0.3 of other accrued expenses.


4. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). GAAP outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy intended to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures. Certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, and disclosures are required for items measured at fair value.

67 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

We measure our financial instruments using inputs from the following three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date.

liabilities.

Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (that is, interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3 inputs include unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. These inputs are developed based on the best information available, including internal data.

For the contingent consideration related to the DataFuzion acquisition, we utilized an option pricing model, specifically a Black-Scholes-Merton model, to estimate the fair value of the contingent liability as of the reporting dates. This model uses certain assumptions related to risk-free rates and volatility as well as certain judgments in forecasting ARR. The contingent consideration has been measured as Level 3 given the unobservable inputs that are significant to the measurement of the liability.

Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

As of December 31, 2018, ourOur financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were categorized as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale customer funds assets

 

$

 

 

$

1,952.4

 

(a)

 

$

 

 

$

1,952.4

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

 

 

$

1,952.4

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,952.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DataFuzion contingent consideration

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

6.0

 

 

$

6.0

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

6.0

 

 

$

6.0

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale customer funds assets

 

$

 

 

$

1,719.1

 

(a)

 

$

 

 

$

1,719.1

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

 

 

$

1,719.1

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,719.1

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

 

Level 3

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale customer trust funds assets

 

$

1,719.6

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,719.6

 

(a)

 

$

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

1,719.6

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,719.6

 

 

 

$

 

(a)
Fair value is based on inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, other than quoted prices.

68 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

As of

The contingent consideration is included within other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017,2021, we recognized expense of $0.6 million within selling, general, and administrative expense in our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were categorized as follows:consolidated statements of operations due to the remeasurement of the DataFuzion contingent consideration.

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

 

Level 3

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale customer trust funds assets

 

$

1,782.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,782.1

 

(a)

 

$

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

1,782.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,782.1

 

 

 

$

 

(a)

Fair value is based on inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, other than quoted prices.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of a business combination are measured at fair value. Please refer to Note 3, “Business Combinations,” for additional information on our business combinations. During the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, we did not re-measure any financial assets or liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

5. Customer Trust Funds

Overview

In connection with our U.S., Canada, India, Singapore, China, and CanadianMalaysia payroll and tax filing services, we collect funds for payment of payroll and taxes; temporarily hold such funds, in trust for the U.S. and Canadian funds, until payment is due; remit the funds to the clients’ employees and appropriate taxing authorities; file federal, state, and local tax returns; and handle related regulatory correspondence and amendments. The assets held in trust are intended for the specific purpose of satisfying client fund obligations and therefore are not freely available for our general business use.


Our customer trust funds are held and invested with the primary objectives being to protect the principal balance and to ensure adequate liquidity to meet cash flow requirements. Accordingly, we maintain on average approximately 46%56% of customer trust funds in liquidity portfolios with maturities ranging from one to 120 days, consisting of high-quality bank deposits, money market mutual funds, commercial paper, or collateralized short-term investments; and we maintain on average approximately 54%44% of customer trust funds in fixed income portfolios with maturities ranging from 120 days to 10 years, consisting of U.S. Treasury and agency securities, Canada government and provincial securities, as well as highly rated asset-backed, mortgage-backed, municipal, corporate, and bank securities. To maintain sufficient liquidity in the trust to meet payment obligations, we also have financing arrangements and may pledge fixed income securities for short-term financing.

Financial Statement Presentation

Investment income from invested customer trust funds, constitutesalso referred to as float revenue or float, is a component of our compensation for providing services under agreements with our customers. Investment income from invested customer trust funds included in revenue amounted to $67.0, $46.5,$41.1 million, $52.3 million, and $39.1$80.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively. Investment income includes interest income, realized gains and losses from sales of customer trust funds’ investments, and unrealized credit losses determined to be other-than-temporary.unrecoverable.

69 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

The amortized cost of customer trust funds as of December 31, 20182021, and 2017,2020, is comprised of the original cost of assets acquired. The amortized cost and fair values of investments of customer trust funds available for sale at December 31, 2018 and 2017, were as follows:

Investments of Customer Trust Funds at December 31, 2018

 

 

Amortized

 

 

Gross Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Gain

 

 

Loss

 

 

Value

 

Money market securities, investments carried at cost and

   other cash equivalents

 

$

872.3

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

872.3

 

Available for sale investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency securities

 

 

573.4

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(11.4

)

 

 

562.2

 

Canadian and provincial government securities

 

 

392.5

 

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

394.5

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

499.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

(4.7

)

 

 

495.3

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

247.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

244.6

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

8.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

8.3

 

Other securities

 

 

14.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

14.7

 

Total available for sale investments

 

 

1,735.8

 

 

 

4.3

 

 

 

(20.5

)

 

 

1,719.6

 

Invested customer trust funds

 

 

2,608.1

 

 

$

4.3

 

 

$

(20.5

)

 

 

2,591.9

 

Trust receivables

 

 

11.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.6

 

Total customer trust funds

 

$

2,619.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,603.5

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

Gross Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Gain

 

 

Loss

 

 

Value

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Money market securities, investments carried at cost and other cash equivalents

 

$

1,562.4

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,562.4

 

Available for sale investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency securities

 

 

697.8

 

 

 

9.5

 

 

 

(5.8

)

 

 

701.5

 

Canadian and provincial government securities

 

 

399.9

 

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

403.9

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

551.4

 

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

(3.1

)

 

 

556.6

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

174.2

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

175.4

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.7

 

Other short-term investments

 

 

41.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41.4

 

Other securities

 

 

71.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

70.9

 

Total available for sale investments

 

 

1,939.1

 

 

 

24.6

 

 

 

(11.3

)

 

 

1,952.4

 

Invested customer funds

 

 

3,501.5

 

 

$

24.6

 

 

$

(11.3

)

 

 

3,514.8

 

Receivables

 

 

18.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.0

 

Total customer funds

 

$

3,519.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,535.8

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

Gross Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Gain

 

 

Loss

 

 

Value

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Money market securities, investments carried at cost and other cash equivalents

 

$

2,027.1

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,027.1

 

Available for sale investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency securities

 

 

494.0

 

 

 

21.6

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

515.5

 

Canadian and provincial government securities

 

 

396.4

 

 

 

15.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

411.9

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

548.5

 

 

 

19.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

567.9

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

192.2

 

 

 

4.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

197.1

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

Other securities

 

 

16.5

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.6

 

Total available for sale investments

 

 

1,657.5

 

 

 

61.7

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

1,719.1

 

Invested customer funds

 

 

3,684.6

 

 

$

61.7

 

 

$

(0.1

)

 

 

3,746.2

 

Receivables

 

 

13.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.2

 

Total customer funds

 

$

3,697.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,759.4

 


Investments of Customer Trust Funds at December 31, 2017

 

 

Amortized

 

 

Gross Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Gain

 

 

Loss

 

 

Value

 

Money market securities, investments carried at cost

   and other cash equivalents

 

$

2,309.3

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,309.3

 

Available for sale investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agency securities

 

 

584.6

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(7.1

)

 

 

577.6

 

Canadian and provincial government securities

 

 

418.2

 

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

(1.5

)

 

 

423.3

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

472.3

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

470.6

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

280.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

279.0

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

15.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

14.8

 

Other securities

 

 

17.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

16.8

 

Total available for sale investments

 

 

1,787.9

 

 

 

7.5

 

 

 

(13.3

)

 

 

1,782.1

 

Invested customer trust funds

 

 

4,097.2

 

 

$

7.5

 

 

$

(13.3

)

 

 

4,091.4

 

Trust receivables

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.3

 

Total customer trust funds

 

$

4,105.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,099.7

 

The following represents the gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of the investments of customer trust funds available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2018.position.

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

 

12 months or more

 

 

Total

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

 

12 months or more

 

 

Total

 

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

 

Fair
Value

 

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

 

Fair
Value

 

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

 

Fair
Value

 

 

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Unrealized

Losses

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

U.S. government and agency securities

 

$

(1.0

)

 

$

100.1

 

 

$

(10.4

)

 

$

419.1

 

 

$

(11.4

)

 

$

519.2

 

 

$

(4.9

)

 

$

316.8

 

$

(0.9

)

 

$

40.8

 

$

(5.8

)

 

$

357.6

 

Canadian and provincial government securities

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

14.5

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

130.5

 

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

145.0

 

 

(1.3

)

 

75.4

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

75.4

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

136.6

 

 

 

(3.6

)

 

 

204.6

 

 

 

(4.7

)

 

 

341.2

 

 

(3.1

)

 

209.7

 

 

 

 

 

(3.1

)

 

209.7

 

Asset-backed securities

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

40.7

 

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

169.1

 

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

209.8

 

 

(0.3

)

 

47.7

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

47.7

 

Mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

8.2

 

Other securities

 

(a)

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

12.8

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

14.5

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

69.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

69.3

 

Total available for sale investments

 

$

(2.4

)

 

$

293.6

 

 

$

(18.1

)

 

$

944.3

 

 

$

(20.5

)

 

$

1,237.9

 

 

$

(10.4

)

 

$

718.9

 

 

$

(0.9

)

 

$

40.8

 

 

$

(11.3

)

 

$

759.7

 

70 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

 

(a)

These investments have been in an unrealized loss position; however, the amount of unrealized loss is less than $0.05.

Management does not believe that any individual unrealized loss was unrecoverable as of December 31, 2018, represents an other-than-temporary impairment.2021. The unrealized losses are primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and not to credit deterioration. We currently do not intend to sell or expect to be required to sell the securities before the time required to recover the amortized cost.

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale at December 31, 2018,2021, by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or to prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

1,946.6

 

 

$

1,949.6

 

Due in one to three years

 

 

697.7

 

 

 

710.2

 

Due in three to five years

 

 

651.5

 

 

 

645.8

 

Due after five years

 

 

205.7

 

 

 

209.2

 

Invested customer funds

 

$

3,501.5

 

 

$

3,514.8

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

Fair Value

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

1,139.4

 

 

$

1,139.4

 

Due in one to three years

 

 

599.9

 

 

 

593.8

 

Due in three to five years

 

 

651.3

 

 

 

646.9

 

Due after five years

 

 

217.5

 

 

 

211.8

 

Invested customer trust funds

 

$

2,608.1

 

 

$

2,591.9

 


6. Trade and Other Receivables, Net

The balance in tradeTrade and other receivables, net, is comprisedconsist of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Trade receivables from customers

 

$

130.3

 

 

$

95.1

 

Interest receivable from invested customer funds

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

1.8

 

Other

 

 

20.7

 

 

 

11.7

 

Total gross receivables

 

 

154.2

 

 

 

108.6

 

Less: reserve for sales adjustments

 

 

(4.0

)

 

 

(4.4

)

Less: allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

(3.9

)

 

 

(3.1

)

Trade and other receivables, net

 

$

146.3

 

 

$

101.1

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Trade receivables from customers

 

$

68.6

 

 

$

67.2

 

Interest receivable from invested customer trust funds

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.7

 

Other

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

3.7

 

Total gross receivables

 

 

75.0

 

 

 

72.6

 

Less: reserve for sales adjustments

 

 

(3.8

)

 

 

(4.7

)

Less: allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(1.3

)

Trade and other receivables, net

 

$

69.9

 

 

$

66.6

 

The activity related to the allowance for doubtful accounts iswas as follows for each of the periods:follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

3.1

 

 

$

2.4

 

 

$

1.3

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

3.2

 

Charge-offs, net of recoveries

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(2.1

)

Balance at end of year

 

$

3.9

 

 

$

3.1

 

 

$

2.4

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

1.3

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

1.1

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

1.1

 

Charge-offs, net of recoveries

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(0.4

)

Balance at end of year

 

$

1.3

 

 

$

1.3

 

 

$

1.8

 

7. Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net

Property, plant, and equipment, net consist of the following:

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Land

 

$

7.5

 

 

$

7.5

 

 

$

 

$

7.5

 

Software

 

 

225.0

 

 

 

197.4

 

 

357.2

 

306.3

 

Machinery and equipment

 

 

117.5

 

 

 

120.3

 

 

121.7

 

120.2

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

40.5

 

 

 

36.3

 

 

 

31.9

 

 

 

48.9

 

Total property, plant and equipment

 

 

390.5

 

 

 

361.5

 

Total property, plant, and equipment

 

510.8

 

482.9

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(286.1

)

 

 

(259.5

)

 

 

(382.6

)

 

 

(346.5

)

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

$

104.4

 

 

$

102.0

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net

 

$

128.2

 

 

$

136.4

 

71 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Depreciation expense ofrelated to property, plant, and equipment, totaled $38.1, $35.3,net was $53.6 million, $48.0 million, and $34.8$40.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively.

8. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill and changes therein were as followsfollows:

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

$

1,973.5

 

Acquisitions

 

 

42.7

 

Translation

 

 

15.6

 

Balance at December 31, 2020

 

 

2,031.8

 

Acquisitions

 

 

308.2

 

Translation

 

 

(16.4

)

Balance at December 31, 2021

 

$

2,323.6

 

Tax-deductible goodwill at December 31, 2021

 

$

53.9

 

Please refer to Note 3, “Business Combinations,” for the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017:further discussion of our acquisitions.

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

1,933.1

 

Translation

 

 

27.9

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

 

1,961.0

 

Translation

 

 

(33.6

)

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

$

1,927.4

 

Tax-deductible goodwill at December 31, 2018

 

$

10.6

 


We perform an impairment assessment of our goodwill balances as of October 1 of each year. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level, which is the operating segment level or one level below. After consideration of the LifeWorks Disposition, management has concluded that we have one reporting unit. Please refer to Note 3, “Discontinued Operations,” for further discussion of the LifeWorks Disposition.

We performed a qualitative impairment testassessment as of October 1, 2018,2021 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is lessmore than its carrying amount.

Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets, net consist of the following asfollowing:

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

Gross Carrying
Amount

 

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

Estimated Life
Range (Years)

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

Customer lists and relationships

 

$

308.4

 

 

$

(220.4

)

 

$

88.0

 

 

4-12

Trade name

 

 

184.4

 

 

 

(3.2

)

 

 

181.2

 

 

3-5 and Indefinite

Technology

 

 

233.9

 

 

 

(170.6

)

 

 

63.3

 

 

3-5

Total other intangible assets

 

$

726.7

 

 

$

(394.2

)

 

$

332.5

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

Gross Carrying
Amount

 

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

Estimated Life
Range (Years)

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

Customer lists and relationships

 

$

229.0

 

 

$

(212.1

)

 

$

16.9

 

 

5-15

Trade name

 

 

177.7

 

 

 

(2.5

)

 

 

175.2

 

 

3-5 and Indefinite

Technology

 

 

159.5

 

 

 

(156.6

)

 

 

2.9

 

 

3-4

Total other intangible assets

 

$

566.2

 

 

$

(371.2

)

 

$

195.0

 

 

 

72 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of December 31, 2018:Contents

 

 

Gross Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

Estimated Life

Range (Years)

 

Customer lists and relationships

 

$

205.4

 

 

$

(190.2

)

 

$

15.2

 

 

5-15

 

Tradename

 

 

173.5

 

 

 

(1.9

)

 

 

171.6

 

 

 

 

Technology

 

 

152.2

 

 

 

(151.5

)

 

 

0.7

 

 

3-4

 

Total other intangible assets

 

$

531.1

 

 

$

(343.6

)

 

$

187.5

 

 

 

 

 

WeAs of October 1 each year, we perform an impairment assessment of our trade nameindefinite-lived intangible assets, which includes our Ceridian and Dayforce trade names, which have a carrying value of $167.2 million and $4.7 million, respectively as of December 31, 2021. We performed a qualitative assessment as of October 1, of each year. We performed the relief from royalty method impairment test as of October 1, 2018,2021 and concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of our Ceridian and Dayforce trade name intangible assetsnames exceeded their respective carrying amount.amounts. We continue to evaluate the use of our trade names and branding in our sales and marketing efforts. If there is a fundamental shift in the method of our branding in the future, we will assess the impact on the carrying amount of our trade name intangible assets and to determine whether an impairment exists. If it is determined that an impairment has occurred, a non-cash expenseit would be recognized during the period in which the decision was made to make the fundamental shift.

Other intangible assets consist of the following as of December 31, 2017:

 

 

Gross Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Net

 

 

Estimated Life

Range (Years)

 

Customer lists and relationships

 

$

210.1

 

 

$

(177.0

)

 

$

33.1

 

 

5-15

 

Tradename

 

 

174.1

 

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

172.0

 

 

 

 

Technology

 

 

155.6

 

 

 

(154.2

)

 

 

1.4

 

 

2-7

 

Total other intangible assets

 

$

539.8

 

 

$

(333.3

)

 

$

206.5

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible assets was $18.5, $18.5,$23.9 million, $3.8 million, and $18.4$16.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively. We estimate the future amortization of other intangible assets held at December 31, 2018, will be:is as follows:

Years Ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2022

 

$

30.0

 

2023

 

 

29.6

 

2024

 

 

28.8

 

2025

 

 

26.4

 

2026

 

 

12.0

 

Thereafter

 

 

33.8

 

Long-Lived Assets by Geographic Area

Years Ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

2019

 

$

15.2

 

2020

 

 

0.2

 

2021

 

 

0.2

 

2022

 

 

0.2

 

2023

 

$

0.1

 

Long-lived assets consist of right of use lease asset, property, plant and equipment, net, goodwill, and other intangible assets, net. Long-lived assets by country consist of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

United States

 

$

1,795.6

 

 

$

1,796.9

 

Canada

 

 

530.9

 

 

 

488.6

 

Australia

 

 

370.0

 

 

 

23.2

 

Other

 

 

117.2

 

 

 

82.4

 

Total long-lived assets

 

$

2,813.7

 

 

$

2,391.1

 

73 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents


9. Debt

Overview

Set forth below is a description of certain debt facilities for which Ceridian was obligated during the periods covered by these consolidated financial statements. Our debt obligations consist of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Term Debt, interest rate of 5.8% and 5.1% as of December 31, 2018 and

   2017, respectively

 

$

678.3

 

 

$

657.3

 

Senior Notes, interest rate of 11.0% as of December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

475.0

 

Revolving Credit Facility ($300.0 available capacity less amounts reserved

   for letters of credit, which were $2.7 as of December 31, 2018, and

   $130.0 available capacity less amounts reserved for letters of credit,

   which were $2.9 as of December 31, 2017)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada Line of Credit (CDN $7.0 available capacity as of December 31,

   2018 and 2017; USD $5.1 as of December 31, 2018 and USD $5.6 as

   of December 31, 2017)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

 

678.3

 

 

 

1,132.3

 

Less unamortized discount on Term Debt

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

0.9

 

Less unamortized debt issuance costs on Senior Notes and Term Debt

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

11.6

 

Less current portion of long-term debt

 

 

6.8

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

$

663.5

 

 

$

1,119.8

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Term Debt, interest rate of 2.6%, respectively

 

$

657.9

 

 

$

664.7

 

Revolving Credit Facility ($300.0 million available capacity less amounts reserved for letters of credit, which were $2.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible Senior Notes, interest rate of 0.25%

 

 

575.0

 

 

 

 

Australia Line of Credit (AUD $2.9 million letter of credit capacity as of December 31, 2021, which was fully utilized; USD $2.1 million as of December 31, 2021)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada Line of Credit (CDN $7.0 million letter of credit capacity as of December 31, 2020, which was fully utilized; USD $5.4 million as of December 31, 2020)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing lease liabilities (Please refer to Note 15)

 

 

9.6

 

 

 

8.8

 

Total debt

 

 

1,242.5

 

 

 

673.5

 

Less unamortized discount on Term Debt and Convertible Senior Notes

 

 

95.5

 

 

 

1.2

 

Less unamortized debt issuance costs on Term Debt and Convertible Senior Notes

 

 

14.3

 

 

 

4.5

 

Less current portion of long-term debt

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

7.2

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

$

1,124.4

 

 

$

660.6

 

Accrued interest and fees related to our debt obligations was $0.5 million and $0.1 million as of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively, and is included within Other accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets.

Senior Secured Credit FacilitiesFacility

Principal Amounts and Maturity Dates

On November 14, 2014, the 2014 Senior Secured Credit Facility was put into place, consisting of (i) a $702.0 term loan debt facility (the “2014 Term Debt”) and (ii) a $130.0 revolving credit facility (the “2014 Revolving Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 2017, the 2014 Term Debt had a maturity date of September 2020, and the 2014 Revolving Credit Facility had a maturity date of September 2019. The 2014 Term Debt required quarterly principal payments of 0.25% of the original principal amount. Ceridian made mandatory pre-payments towards the principal balance of the 2014 Term Debt with the proceeds received from the sale of the UK Business during the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, of $0.3 and $25.9, respectively. These pre-payments were applied against the scheduled quarterly principal payments.

On April 30, 2018, Ceridianwe completed the refinancing of the remainingour debt under the 2014 Senior Secured Credit Facility by entering into a new credit agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the new credit agreement, Ceridianwe became borrower of (i) a $680.0$680.0 million term loan debt facility (the “2018 Term“Term Debt”) and (ii) a $300.0$300.0 million revolving credit facility (the “2018 Revolving“Revolving Credit Facility”) (collectively, the “2018 Senior“Senior Secured Credit Facility”). The 2018Our obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Facility isare secured by first priority security interests in substantially all of our assets of Ceridian.and the domestic subsidiary guarantors, subject to permitted liens and certain exceptions.

In connection with the refinancingThe Term Debt will mature on April 30, 2025. We are required to make annual amortization payments in respect of the 2014Term Debt in an amount equal to 1.00% of the original principal amount thereof, payable in equal quarterly installments of 0.25% of the original principal amount of the first lien term debt. On December 15, 2021, we completed the second amendment to our Senior Secured Credit Facility, we recognized a loss on debt extinguishmentwhich extended the maturity date of $7.1 within interest expense, net on our consolidated statement of operations during the year ended December 31, 2018.Revolving Credit Facility from April 30, 2023 to January 29, 2025. The Revolving Credit Facility does not require amortization payments.

Interest

The effective interest rate on the 2014 Term Debt at December 31, 20172021, and 2020, was 5.1%2.6%. The 2014 Term Debt had an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5%, subject to a 1.0% LIBOR floor.

The effective interest rate on the 2018 Term Debt at December 31, 2018 was 5.8%. The 2018 Term Debt is currentlyinitially subject to an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25%3.25%. InAs a result of a ratings upgrade on March 26, 2019, of our Senior Secured Credit Facility by Moody’s Investor Service, from B3 to B2, the event our corporate rating from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. is B2 or better, theCompany’s floating rate Term Debt interest rate iswas reduced from LIBOR plus 3.25% to LIBOR plus 3.00%3.00%, so long as the rating is maintained. On February 19, 2020, we completed the first amendment to the Senior Secured Credit Facility in


74 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

which the interest rate was reduced from LIBOR plus 3.00% to LIBOR plus 2.5%. Further, the interest rate trigger under the applicable rating by Moody’s Investor Service was removed by the first amendment.

Financing Costs and Issuance Discounts

The 2014 Term Debt had associated unamortized deferred financing costs of $5.4 at December 31, 2017 which were being amortized at the effective interest rate of 4.8%.

In connection with theour debt refinancing of the 2014 Senior Secured Credit Facility,in 2018, we capitalized $3.6$3.6 million of additional financing costs and wrote off $0.5$0.5 million of existing unamortized deferred financing costs, which was included in the loss on extinguishment of debt. The 2018 Term Debt had associated unamortized deferred financing costs of $8.0$5.2 million and $5.7 million at December 31, 2018,2021, and 2020, respectively, which are being amortized at an effective interest rate of 5.3%5.3%. In connection with the second amendment in 2021, we capitalized $0.8 million of additional financing costs.

Collateral and Guarantees

The 2018 Senior Secured Credit Facility names Ceridianus as the sole borrower and is unconditionally guaranteed by Ceridian’sour domestic, wholly-owned financially material restricted subsidiaries, subject to certain customary exceptions. The 2018 Senior Secured Credit Facility is secured by a perfected first priority security interest, subject to certain exceptions (including customer trust funds), in substantially all of Ceridian’sour and the subsidiary guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets. The security interest includes a pledge of the capital stock of certain of Ceridian’sour direct and indirect material restricted subsidiaries.

Representations, Warranties and Covenants

The documents governing the 2018 Senior Secured Credit Facility contain certain customary representations and warranties. In addition, those documents contain customary covenants restricting Ceridian’sour ability and certain of itsour subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things: incur additional indebtedness, issue disqualified stock and preferred stock; create liens; declare dividends; redeem capital stock; make investments; engage in a materially different line of business; engage in certain mergers, consolidations, acquisitions, asset sales, or other fundamental changes; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; enter into certain restrictive agreements; make prepayments on any subordinated indebtedness; modify junior financing documentation; and make changes to our fiscal year.

The 2018 Senior Secured Credit Facility documents contain a requirement that Ceridianwe maintain a ratio of adjusted first lien debt to Credit Facility EBITDA below specified levels on a quarterly basis; however, such requirement is applicable only if more than 35% of the 2018 Revolving Credit Facility is drawn. As of December 31, 2018,2021, no portion of the 2018 Revolving Credit Facility was drawn.

Events of Default

Events of default under the 2018 Senior Secured Credit Facility documents include, but are not limited to: failure to pay interest, principal and fees, or other amounts when due; material breach of any representation or warranty; covenant defaults; cross defaults to other material indebtedness; events of bankruptcy, invalidity of security interests; a change of control; material judgments for payment of money; involuntary acceleration of any debt; and other customary events of default. There were no events of default as of December 31, 2018.2021.

Convertible Senior Notes

General Description

On October 1, 2013, CeridianIn March 2021, we issued the$575.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and pursuant to exemptions from the prospectus requirements of applicable Canadian securities laws, including the exercise in full by the initial purchasers of their option to purchase an additional $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (collectively, the “Convertible Senior Notes”). The Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 0.25% per year and interest is payable semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2021. The Convertible Senior Notes mature on March 15, 2026, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. The total net proceeds from the offering, after deducting initial purchase discounts and other debt issuance costs, were $561.8 million.

75 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

The Convertible Senior Notes are unsecured obligations and do not contain any financial covenants or restrictions on the payments of dividends, the incurrence of indebtedness or the issuance or repurchase of securities by us or any of our subsidiaries.

The following table presents details of the Convertible Senior Notes:

 

 

Initial Conversion Rate per $1,000 Principal

 

Initial Conversion Price per Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible Senior Notes

 

7.5641 shares

 

$

132.20

 

The Convertible Senior Notes will be convertible at the option of the holders at any time only under the following circumstances:

During any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on June 30, 2021, if the last reported sale price per share of our common stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price for each of at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ending on, and including, the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter;
During the 5 consecutive business days immediately after any 10 consecutive trading day period (such 10 consecutive trading day period, the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes for each trading day of the measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price per share of our common stock on such trading day and the conversion rate on such trading day;
Upon the occurrence of certain corporate events or distributions on our common stock, as described in the Indenture under which the Convertible Senior Notes were issued;
If we call such Convertible Senior Notes for redemption; or
At any time from, and including, September 15, 2025 until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately before the maturity date.

Upon conversion, we may satisfy the conversion obligation by paying or delivering, as applicable, cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, at our election, in the manner and subject to the terms and conditions provided in the Indenture under which the Convertible Senior Notes were issued. On December 30, 2021, we notified the holders of the Convertible Senior Notes of our irrevocable election to settle the conversion obligations in connection with the Convertible Senior Notes submitted for conversion on or after January 1, 2022, or at maturity with a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. Generally, under this settlement method, the conversion value will be settled in cash in an amount no less than the principal amount being converted, and any excess of the conversion value over the principal amount will be settled, at the Company's election, in cash or shares of our common stock. During the quarter ended December 31, 2021, the conditions allowing holders of the Convertible Senior Notes to convert have not been met. The Convertible Senior Notes were therefore not convertible during the fourth quarter of 2021 and are classified as a noncurrent liability in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021.

We may not redeem the Convertible Senior Notes prior to March 20, 2024. On or after March 20, 2024, and on or before the 30th scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, we may redeem the Convertible Senior Notes at a cash purchase price equal to the principal amount of $475.0.

Using the net proceeds received from the IPO and concurrent private placement, we satisfied and discharged the indenture governing theConvertible Senior Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, but only if the last reported sale price per share of our common stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price on April (1) each of at least 20 trading days, whether or not consecutive, during the 30 2018, consecutive trading days ending on, and including, the trading day immediately before the date we send the related redemption notice; and (2) the trading day immediately before the date we send such notice. In addition, calling any Convertible Senior Note for redemption will constitute a make-whole fundamental change with respect to that Convertible Senior Note, in which case the conversion rate applicable to the conversion of that Convertible Senior Note will be increased in certain circumstances if it is converted after it is called for redemption.

If a “fundamental change” (as defined in the Indenture under which the Convertible Senior Notes were redeemed on May 30, 2018. In connection withissued) occurs, then noteholders may require us to repurchase their Convertible Senior Notes at a cash repurchase price equal to the redemptionprincipal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

76 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

In accounting for the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes and the related transaction costs, we recognizedseparated the Convertible Senior Notes into liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component was initially calculated by measuring the fair value of similar liabilities that do not have associated convertible features utilizing an interest rate of 4.5%. The carrying amount of the equity component representing the conversion option was $108.6 million and was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the par value of the Convertible Senior Notes. This difference represents a loss on extinguishment of debt of $18.6 withindiscount that is amortized to interest expense net on our consolidated statementover the term of operations during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Interest

TheConvertible Senior Notes using the effective interest rate onmethod. The equity component was recorded in additional paid-in capital and is not remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.

Total issuance costs of $14.4 million related to the Convertible Senior Notes was fixed at 11.0%were allocated between liability, totaling $11.7 million, and equity, totaling $2.7 million, in the same proportion as the allocation of December 31, 2017.


Financing Coststhe total proceeds to the liability and equity components. Issuance Discounts

costs attributable to the liability component are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Convertible Senior Notes. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount is amortized to interest expense over the contractual term of the Convertible Senior Notes had unamortized deferred financing costs of $6.2 at December 31, 2017, which were being amortized at an effective interest rate of 11.45%5.1%. On May 30, 2018,The issuance costs attributable to the redemption date,equity component were netted against additional paid-in capital. The amount recorded for the equity component of the Convertible Senior Notes had unamortized deferred financingwas $77.7 million, net of allocated issuance costs of $5.5,$2.7 million and deferred tax impact of $28.2 million.

The following table sets forth total interest expense recognized related to the Convertible Senior Notes for the period:

 

 

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2021

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Contractual interest expense

 

$

1.2

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

 

14.0

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

 

1.7

 

    Total

 

$

16.9

 

Capped Calls

In March 2021, in connection with the pricing of the Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into capped call transactions with the option counterparties (the “Capped Calls”). The Capped Calls each have an initial strike price of $132.20 per share, and an initial cap price of $179.26 per share, both subject to certain adjustments. The capped call transactions are generally expected to reduce potential dilution to our common stock upon any conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes and/or offset any potential cash payments we would be required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted Convertible Senior Notes, as the case may be, with such reduction and/or offset subject to a cap based on the cap price. For accounting purposes, the Capped Calls are separate transactions, and not part of the terms of the Convertible Senior Notes. As the Capped Calls qualify for a scope exception from derivative accounting for instruments that are both indexed to the issuer's own stock and classified in stockholder’s equity in our consolidated balance sheet, we have recorded an amount of $33.0 million as a reduction to additional paid-in capital, which were written off and included inwill not be remeasured. This represents the loss on extinguishmentpremium of debt.$45.0 million paid for the purchase of the Capped Calls, net of the deferred tax impact of $12.0 million.

77 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Other Information Relating to Indebtedness

Future Payments and Maturities of Debt

The future principal payments and maturities of our indebtedness, excluding financing lease obligations, are as follows:

Years Ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

2019

 

$

6.8

 

2020

 

 

6.8

 

2021

 

 

6.8

 

2022

 

 

6.8

 

2023

 

 

6.8

 

Thereafter

 

 

644.3

 

 

 

$

678.3

 

Years Ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2022

 

$

6.8

 

2023

 

 

6.8

 

2024

 

 

6.8

 

2025

 

 

637.5

 

2026

 

 

575.0

 

 

 

$

1,232.9

 

CeridianWe may be required to make additional payments on the 2018 Term Debt from various sources, including proceeds of certain indebtedness which may be incurred from time to time, certain asset sales, and a certain percentage of cash flow. There is an excess cash flow calculation associated with the 2018 Term Debt, commencing withand based on this calculation, we are not required to make a prepayment on the year ending December 31, 2019.Term Debt in 2022.

Fair Value of Debt

Our debt does not trade in active markets. Based on the borrowing rates currently available to us for bank loans with similar terms and average maturities and the limited trades of our debt, the fair value of our indebtedness was estimated to be $649.5$1,248.9 million and $1,154.1$657.6 million as of December 31, 2018,2021, and 2017,2020, respectively.

Other Debt Financing

Ceridian Canada had available The fair value of the Convertible Senior Notes was determined based on the closing trading price per $1,000 of the Convertible Senior Notes as of the last day of trading for the period. We consider the fair value of the Convertible Senior Notes at December 31, 2018,2021 to be Level 2 measurements as they are not actively traded. The fair value of the Convertible Senior Notes is primarily affected by the trading price of our common stock and 2017,market interest rates.

Other Debt Financing

Ceridian Australia had available a committed bank credit facility that provides up to CDN $7.0,AUD $2.9 million, for issuance of letters of credit and itas of December 31, 2021. The credit facility is a discretionary line at the option of the bank. The amountsamount of letters of credit outstanding under this facility were AUD $2.9 million (USD $2.1 million) at December 31, 2021.

Ceridian Canada had available a committed bank credit facility that provides up to CDN $7.0 million, for issuance of letters of credit as of December 31, 2020. The credit facility is a discretionary line at the option of the bank. The amount of letters of credit outstanding under this facility were CDN $7.0$7.0 million (USD $5.1) and CDN $7.0 (USD $5.6)$5.4 million) at December 31, 2018, and 2017, respectively.2020.

10. Employee Benefit Plans

Ceridian maintainsmaintain numerous benefit plans for current and former employees. As of December 31, 2018,2021, our current active benefit plans include defined contributionscontribution plans for substantially allthe majority of our employees. All of our defined benefit plans have been frozen.

78 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Defined Contribution Plans

Ceridian maintainsWe maintain defined contribution plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially allthe majority of our employees. Contributions are based upon the contractual obligations of each respective plan. We recognized expense of $8.4, $7.5,$15.4 million, $11.1 million, and $7.0$9.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016,2019, respectively, with regardrelated to employer contributions to these plans.

Defined Benefit Plans

Ceridian maintainsWe maintain defined benefit pension plans covering certain of our current and former U.S. employees (the U.S. defined benefitpension plan and nonqualified defined benefit plan, collectively referred to as our “defined benefit plans”), as well as other postretirement benefit plans for certain U.S. retired employees that include heath care and life insurance benefits.


Pension Benefits

The largest defined benefit pension plan (the “U.S. defined benefitpension plan”) is a defined benefit plan for certain current and former U.S. employees that closed to new participants on January 2, 1995. In 2007, the U.S. defined benefitpension plan was amended (1) to exclude from further participation any participant or former participant who was not employed by the ParentCeridian or another participating employer on January 1, 2008, (2) to discontinue participant contributions, and (3) to freeze the accrual of additional benefits as of December 31, 2007. The measurement date for pension benefit plans is December 31.

Assets of the U.S. defined benefitpension plan are held in an irrevocable trust and do not include any Ceridian securities. Benefits under this plan are generally calculated on final or career average earnings and years of participation in the plan. Most participating employees were required to permit salary reduction contributions to the plan on their behalf by the employer as a condition of active participation. Retirees and other former employees are inactive participants in this plan and constitute approximately 99%99% of the plan participants. This plan is funded in accordance with funding requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, based on determinations of a third-party consulting actuary. Investment of the U.S. defined benefitpension plan assets in Ceridian securities is prohibited by the investment policy. We made contributions amounting to $18.5 in 2018 toAs of December 31, 2021, the U.S. defined benefit plan. The required minimum contributions to the U.S. benefit plan are expected to be $6.4 during 2019.is fully funded.

CeridianWe also sponsorssponsor a nonqualified supplemental defined benefit plan (the “nonqualified defined benefit plan”), which is unfunded and provides benefits to selected U.S. employees in addition to the U.S. defined benefit plan. We made contributions to the nonqualified defined benefit plan amounting to $1.9$1.6 million in 20182021 and expect to make contributions of $1.7$1.4 million during 2019.2022.

We account for our defined benefit plans using actuarial models. These models use an attribution approach that generally spreads the effect of individual events over the estimated life expectancy of the employees in such plans. These events include plan amendments and changes in actuarial assumptions such as the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, discount rate related to the benefit obligation, and mortality rates.

One of the principal components of the net periodic pension calculation is the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The required use of expected long-term rate of return on plan assets may result in recognized pension income that is greater or less than the actual returns of those plan assets in any given year. Over time, however, the expected long-term returns are designed to approximate the actual long-term returns that contribute to the settlement of the liability. Differences between actual and expected returns are recognized in the net periodic pension calculation over three years. We use long-term historical actual return information, the mix of investments that comprise plan assets, and future estimates of long-term investment returns by reference to external sources to develop our expected return on plan assets.

The discount rate assumption is used to determine the benefit obligation and the interest portion of the net periodic pension cost (credit) for the following year. We utilize a full yield curve approach for our discount rate assumption by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. As of December 31, 2018,2021, a 25 basis point decrease in the discount rate would result in a $0.1$0.2 million decrease to expense for all pension plans.

79 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2017,2021, we updated our mortality assumptions utilizing a new improvement scale issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2021, which resulted in a $2 million increase in the projected benefit obligation. At December 31, 2020, we updated our mortality assumptions utilizing an improvement scale issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2017,2020, which resulted in a $6.0$6.0 million reduction in the projected benefit obligation. At December 31, 2018, we updated our mortality assumptions utilizing an improvement scale issued by the Society of Actuaries in October 2018, which resulted in a $1.5 reduction in the projected benefit obligation.

The funded status of defined benefit plans represents the difference between the projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) and the plan assets at fair value. The projected benefit obligation of defined benefit plans exceeded the fair value of plan assets exceeded the PBO of defined benefit plans by $145.8$1.6 million and $154.4$3.5 million at December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. We are required to record the unfundedfunded status as aan asset or liability in our consolidated balance sheets and recognize the change in the funded status in comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes.


The projected future payments to participants from defined benefit plans are included in the table below.as follows:

Years Ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2022

 

$

44.6

 

2023

 

 

43.1

 

2024

 

 

41.6

 

2025

 

 

39.2

 

2026

 

 

37.1

 

Next five years

 

$

159.1

 

Years Ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

2019

 

$

46.0

 

2020

 

 

45.0

 

2021

 

 

44.0

 

2022

 

 

42.7

 

2023

 

 

41.5

 

Next five years

 

$

183.5

 

The accompanying tables reflect the combined funded status and net periodic pension cost and combined supporting assumptions for the defined benefit elements of our defined benefit plans.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Funded Status of Defined Benefit Retirement Plans at Measurement Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Projected Benefit Obligation During the Year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

555.2

 

 

$

547.2

 

Interest cost

 

 

6.7

 

 

 

12.7

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

(10.5

)

 

 

42.4

 

Benefits paid and plan expenses

 

 

(48.0

)

 

 

(47.1

)

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

503.4

 

 

$

555.2

 

Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets During the Year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year

 

 

558.7

 

 

 

425.6

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

(7.2

)

 

 

73.3

 

Employer contributions

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

106.9

 

Benefits paid and plan expenses

 

 

(48.1

)

 

 

(47.1

)

Plan assets at fair value at end of year

 

 

505.0

 

 

 

558.7

 

Funded status of plans

 

$

1.6

 

 

$

3.5

 

80 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncurrent asset

 

$

12.1

 

 

$

15.8

 

Current liability

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

1.5

 

Noncurrent liability

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

10.8

 

Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $49.4 million and $51.4 million, respectively

 

$

157.9

 

 

$

163.3

 

The overall decrease in our benefit obligation for the year ended December 31, 2021 was primarily driven by benefit payments paid, plan expenses, and actuarial gains.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Funded Status of Defined Benefit Retirement Plans at

   Measurement Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Projected Benefit Obligation During the Year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

 

$

593.0

 

 

$

605.9

 

Service cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest cost

 

 

16.3

 

 

 

17.2

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

(31.6

)

 

 

20.3

 

Benefits paid and plan expenses

 

 

(50.3

)

 

 

(50.4

)

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

 

$

527.4

 

 

$

593.0

 

Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets During the Year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year

 

 

438.6

 

 

 

416.4

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

 

(27.1

)

 

 

49.6

 

Employer contributions

 

 

20.4

 

 

 

23.0

 

Benefits paid and plan expenses

 

 

(50.3

)

 

 

(50.4

)

Plan assets at fair value at end of year

 

 

381.6

 

 

 

438.6

 

Funded status of plans

 

$

(145.8

)

 

$

(154.4

)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liability

 

$

8.1

 

 

$

20.3

 

Noncurrent liability

 

 

137.7

 

 

 

134.1

 

Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other

   Comprehensive Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax of

   $91.5 and $91.5, respectively

 

$

158.6

 

 

$

151.4

 

The other comprehensive (income) loss related to pension benefit plans iswas as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Net actuarial loss (gain)

 

$

21.4

 

 

$

(3.0

)

 

$

9.5

 

 

$

9.9

 

 

$

(8.0

)

 

$

1.0

 

Amortization of net actuarial loss

 

 

(14.2

)

 

 

(12.8

)

 

 

(12.5

)

 

 

(17.3

)

 

 

(15.7

)

 

 

(12.7

)

Tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

2.9

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

$

7.2

 

 

$

(15.8

)

 

$

(2.9

)

 

$

(5.4

)

 

$

(17.3

)

 

$

(8.8

)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Assumptions Used in Calculations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate used to determine net benefit cost

 

 

1.87

%

 

 

2.81

%

 

 

3.92

%

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

2.70

%

 

 

5.70

%

 

 

6.00

%

Discount rate used to determine benefit obligations

 

 

2.36

%

 

 

1.87

%

 

 

2.81

%

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Net Periodic Pension Cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest cost

 

$

6.7

 

 

$

12.7

 

 

$

18.2

 

Actuarial loss amortization

 

 

17.3

 

 

 

15.7

 

 

 

12.7

 

Less: Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(13.1

)

 

 

(22.9

)

 

 

(23.6

)

Net periodic pension cost

 

$

10.9

 

 

$

5.5

 

 

$

7.3

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Assumptions Used in Calculations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate used to determine net benefit cost

 

 

3.25

%

 

 

3.63

%

 

 

3.76

%

Expected return on plan assets

 

 

6.30

%

 

 

6.30

%

 

 

6.30

%

Discount rate used to determine benefit obligations%

 

 

3.92

%

 

 

3.25

%

 

 

3.63

%

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net Periodic Pension Cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest cost

 

$

16.3

 

 

$

17.2

 

 

$

18.2

 

Actuarial loss amortization

 

 

14.2

 

 

 

12.8

 

 

 

12.5

 

Less: Expected return on plan assets

 

 

(25.8

)

 

 

(26.3

)

 

 

(25.7

)

Net periodic pension cost

 

$

4.7

 

 

$

3.7

 

 

$

5.0

 

The accumulated benefit obligation of defined benefit plans was $527.4$503.4 million and $593.0$555.2 million as of December 31, 20182021, and 2017,2020, respectively.

The amount in accumulated other comprehensive loss that is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost during 2019 is a net actuarial loss of $12.7.

Our overall investment strategy for the U.S. defined benefitpension plan is to achieve a mix of approximately 70%83% for liability hedging purposes, 15% of investments for long term growth, 28% for liability hedging purposes and 2%2% for near-term benefit payments. Target asset allocations are based upon actuarial and capital market studies performed by experienced outside consultants. The target allocations for the long term growth assets are 41%62.4% public equity, 24.9% fixed income, 26% international equities, 23% domestic equities and 10% hedge funds.12.7% alternative investments. Specifically, the target allocation is managed through investments in fixed income securities, equity funds, collective investment funds, partnerships and other investment types. The underlying domestic equity securities include exposure to large/mid-cap companies and small-cap companies. Fixed income securities include corporate debt, mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury and U.S. agency debt, emerging market debt and high yield debt securities. The alternative investment strategy is allocated to investments in hedge funds. The liability hedging portfolio fair value is intended to move in a direction that partiallysubstantially offsets the increase or decrease in the liabilities resulting from changes in interest rates. To achieve this objective, the portfolio will invest in corporate debt securities, U.S. Treasury strips and

81 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

various interest rate derivatives contracts. We hire outside managers to manage all assets of the U.S. defined benefit plan.

In determining the fair values of the defined benefit plan’s assets, we calculate the fair value of certain investments using net asset value ("NAV") per share. Collective investment funds are valued at the NAV, which is based on the readily determinable fair value of the underlying securities owned by the fund. The NAV unit price is quoted on a private market or one that is not active. Partnerships consist primarily of a bond fund partnership valued at the NAV as reported by the fund manager and an investment in a venture capital fund valued by an independent appraisal. The NAV represents the value at which the defined benefit plan initiates a transaction. These investments do not have any significant unfunded commitments, conditions or restrictions on redemption, or any other significant restriction on their sale. The hedge fund of funds investment has a quarterly redemption restriction with a 65 day notice period. Plan investments with estimated fair value using NAV were $212.6 and $280.6 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.


The fair values of the defined benefit plan’s assets at December 31, 2018, by asset category are as follows:

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Investments, at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments

 

$

57.9

 

 

$

57.9

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Derivatives (a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government securities

 

 

92.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

92.4

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

18.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.7

 

 

 

 

Collective investment funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic equity (b)

 

 

80.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

80.1

 

 

 

 

Foreign equity (b)

 

 

48.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

48.5

 

 

 

 

Foreign bond (c)

 

 

23.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.8

 

 

 

 

Partnerships (d)

 

 

32.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

 

 

 

Hedge fund of funds (e)

 

 

28.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.1

 

 

 

 

Total investments, at fair value

 

$

381.6

 

 

$

57.9

 

 

$

323.7

 

 

$

 

The fair values of our defined benefit plan’s assets at December 31, 2017, by asset category arewere as follows:

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Investments, at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments

 

$

36.8

 

 

$

36.8

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Derivatives (a)

 

 

14.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.8

 

 

 

 

Government securities

 

 

88.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

88.1

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

18.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.3

 

 

 

 

Collective investment funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic equity (b)

 

 

144.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

144.4

 

 

 

 

Foreign equity (b)

 

 

57.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

57.5

 

 

 

 

Foreign bond (c)

 

 

41.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

41.8

 

 

 

 

Partnerships (d)

 

 

35.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

35.3

 

 

 

 

Hedge fund of funds (e)

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

Total investments, at fair value

 

$

438.6

 

 

$

36.8

 

 

$

401.8

 

 

$

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Investments, at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments

 

$

26.7

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

26.7

 

Government securities

 

 

 

 

 

16.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.7

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

384.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

384.2

 

Collective investment funds

 

 

 

 

 

77.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

77.4

 

Total investments, at fair value

 

$

26.7

 

 

$

478.3

 

 

$

 

 

$

505.0

 

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Investments, at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments

 

$

83.5

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

83.5

 

Government securities

 

 

 

 

 

46.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

46.7

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

322.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

322.4

 

Collective investment funds

 

 

 

 

106.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

106.1

 

Total investments, at fair value

 

$

83.5

 

 

$

475.2

 

 

$

 

 

$

558.7

 

(a)

Funds in this category invest in futures (2018) and interest rate swaps (2017) to reduce exposure to long-term interest rate risk and to achieve overall investment portfolio objectives. The future derivatives are marked to market and settled in cash on a daily basis.

(b)

Funds in this category invest in a diversified portfolio of domestic and/or foreign stocks to achieve a long-term rate of return.

(c)

Funds in this category invest in various types of domestic and/or foreign debt securities to achieve a long-term rate of return while preserving capital.

(d)

Funds within this category invest in a bond fund partnership which holds various types of domestic debt securities to achieve a long-term rate of return while preserving capital.

(e)

Funds within this category invest in various underlying hedge funds and are designed to provide superior risk adjusted returns as well as portfolio diversification relative to traditional asset classes.

Postretirement Benefits

Ceridian providesWe provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retired employees, including individuals who retired from operations we subsequently sold or discontinued. Ceridian sponsorsWe sponsor several health care plans in the United States for both pre- and post-age 65 retirees. The contributions to these plans differ for various groups of retirees and future retirees. Most retirees outside of the United States are covered by governmental health care programs, and our cost is not significant. The measurement date for postretirement benefit plans is December 31.


The discount rate assumption is used to determine the benefit obligation and the interest portion of the net periodic postretirement cost (credit) for the following year. We utilize a full yield curve approach for our discount rate assumption by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. As of December 31, 2018,2021, a 25 basis point decrease in the discount rate would result in an immaterial impact on expense for the postretirement plan.

82 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

The accompanying tables present the amounts and changes in the aggregate benefit obligation and the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for U.S. plans. We fund these costs as they become due.

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Funded Status of Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Benefit Obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

At beginning of year

 

$

14.1

 

 

$

15.4

 

Interest cost

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.3

 

Participant contributions

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

Actuarial gain

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

(1.9

)

At end of year

 

$

12.6

 

 

$

14.1

 

Change in Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

At beginning of year

 

$

 

 

$

 

Company contributions

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

1.6

 

Participant contributions

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

(1.9

)

At end of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded Status

 

$

(12.6

)

 

$

(14.1

)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liability

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

1.9

 

Noncurrent liability

 

 

10.8

 

 

 

12.2

 

Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income), net of tax of $(5.0) million and $(5.4) million, respectively

 

$

(7.6

)

 

$

(8.6

)

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Funded Status of Postretirement Health Care and Life

   Insurance Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Benefit Obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At beginning of year

 

$

19.6

 

 

$

21.0

 

Interest cost

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

Participant contributions

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

1.1

 

Actuarial gain

 

 

(2.1

)

 

 

(0.7

)

Benefits paid

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

(2.3

)

At end of year

 

$

16.8

 

 

$

19.6

 

Change in Plan Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At beginning of year

 

$

 

 

$

 

Company contributions

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

1.2

 

Participant contributions

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

1.1

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(1.7

)

 

 

(2.3

)

At end of year

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded Status

 

$

(16.8

)

 

$

(19.6

)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liability

 

$

2.2

 

 

$

2.4

 

Noncurrent liability

 

 

14.6

 

 

 

17.2

 

Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other

   Comprehensive Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income,

    net of tax of $(9.9) and $(9.9), respectively

 

$

(8.5

)

 

$

(8.9

)

The other comprehensive (income) loss related to postretirement benefits iswas as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Net actuarial gain

 

$

(2.1

)

 

$

(0.7

)

 

$

(1.4

)

 

$

(0.8

)

 

$

 

$

(0.7

)

Amortization of net actuarial gain

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

2.2

 

2.5

 

2.6

 

Tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss (income), net of tax

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

$

1.2

 

Tax benefit

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(0.5

)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

$

1.0

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

1.4

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest cost

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

0.3

 

 

$

0.5

 

Actuarial gain amortization

 

 

(2.0

)

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

(2.3

)

Prior service credit amortization

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.3

)

Net periodic postretirement benefit gain

 

$

(2.1

)

 

$

(2.2

)

 

$

(2.1

)

83 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Interest cost

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.6

 

Actuarial gain amortization

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

(2.3

)

Prior service credit amortization

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(0.3

)

Net periodic postretirement benefit gain

 

$

(2.0

)

 

$

(2.2

)

 

$

(2.0

)

The amount in accumulated other comprehensive loss that is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic postretirement benefit cost during 2019 is a $2.6 gain, comprised of $2.3 of actuarial gain and $0.3 of prior service credit.

The assumed health care cost trend rate represents the rate at which health care costs are assumed to increase. The assumed health care cost trend rate used in measuring the benefit obligation in 20182021 is 6.90%5.9% for pre-age 65 retirees and 7.70%6.7% for post-age 65 retirees. These rates are assumed to decrease gradually to the ultimate health care cost trend rate of 4.5% in 20282029 for both groups. A one percent increase in this rate would increase the benefit obligation at December 31, 2018, by $0.7 and would have an immaterial impact on the interest cost for 2018. A one percent decrease in this rate would decrease the benefit obligation at December 31, 2018, by $0.6 and would have an immaterial impact on the interest cost for 2018.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Assumptions Used in Calculations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average discount rate used to determine
   net periodic postretirement cost (credit)

 

 

1.42

%

 

 

2.52

%

 

 

3.70

%

Weighted average discount rate used to determine
   benefit obligation at measurement date

 

 

2.00

%

 

 

1.42

%

 

 

2.52

%

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Assumptions Used in Calculations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average discount rate used to determine net

   periodic postretirement cost (credit)

 

 

3.01

%

 

 

3.26

%

 

 

3.38

%

Weighted average discount rate used to determine

   benefit obligation at measurement date

 

 

3.70

%

 

 

3.01

%

 

 

3.26

%

The projected future postretirement benefit payments and future receipts from the federal subsidy for each of the next five years and the five-year period following are included in the table below.as follows:

Years Ending December 31,

 

Payments

 

 

Receipts

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2022

 

$

1.9

 

 

$

 

2023

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

2024

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

2025

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

2026

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

Next five years

 

$

4.0

 

 

$

0.1

 

Years Ending December 31,

 

Payments

 

 

Receipts

 

2019

 

$

2.2

 

 

$

0.1

 

2020

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

0.1

 

2021

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

0.1

 

Next five years

 

$

6.2

 

 

$

0.1

 

11. Share-Based Compensation

Our share-based compensation consists of performance-based stock options, term-based stock options, restricted stock units (“RSU”), and performance-based stock units (“PSU”). We also offer an employee stock purchase plan.

Prior to November 1, 2013, Ceridianour employees participated in a share-based compensation plan of the former ultimate parent of Ceridian. TheCeridian, the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (“2007 SIP”) authorized the issuance of up to 10,540,540 shares of common stock of Parent to eligible participants through stock options and stock awards. Eligible participants in the 2007 SIP included the Parent’s directors, employees and consultants.

. Effective November 1, 2013, although most participants who held stock options under the 2007 SIP converted their options to a newly created option plan, the 2013 Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (“2013 SIP”). A, a small number of participants maintained their stock options in the 2007 SIP. AsConcurrent with the IPO and legal reorganization, all outstanding stock options under the 2007 SIP were converted into options to purchase common stock of Ceridian. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, all remaining outstanding awards under the 2007 SIP were exercised and as of December 31, 2018,2021, there were 5,0000 stock options outstanding under the 2007 SIP.

The 2013 SIP authorized the issuance of up to 12,500,000 shares of common stock of Ceridian to eligible participants through stock options and other stock awards, which was increased to 15,000,000 on March 20, 2017, by the Board of Directors. Eligible participants in the 2013 HCM SIP include Ceridian’s directors, employees, and consultants.


As part of the 2013 SIP, the Board of Directors approved a stock appreciation rights program that authorized the issuance of up to 600,000 stock appreciation rights. The performance criteria for all stock appreciation rights was met on April 30, 2018, resulting in the vesting and cash settlement of all outstanding stock appreciation rights. We recognized $1.5 of share-based compensation expense related to the vesting of these stock appreciation rights during the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2018, there were no remaining outstanding stock appreciation rights.

Stock options awarded under the 2013 SIP vest either annually on a pro rata basis over a four-four- or five-year period or on a specific date if certain performance criteria are satisfied and certain equity values are attained. In addition, upon termination of service, all vested options must be exercised generally within 90 days after termination, or these awards will be forfeited. The stock option awards have a 10-year10-year contractual term and have an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2018,2021, there were 9,356,9041,001,245 stock options and restricted stock unitsRSUs outstanding under the 2013 SIP. We do not intend to grant any additional awards under the 2007 SIP or the 2013 SIP following our IPO.SIP.

On April 24, 2018, in connection with the IPO, the Board of Directors approved the Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (“2018 EIP”), which authorizesauthorized the issuance of up to 13,500,000 shares of common stock to eligible participants through equity awards. awards (the “Share Reserve”). The Share Reserve may be increased on March 31 of each of the first ten calendar years during the term of the 2018 EIP, by the lesser of (i) 3 percent of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding on each January 31 immediately prior to the date of increase or (ii) such number of shares of our common stock determined by the Board of Directors. In addition to prior year increases, as of March 31, 2021, the Share Reserve was increased by 4,397,296 shares, pursuant to the terms of the 2018 EIP.

84 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Equity awards under the 2018 EIP vest either annually or quarterly on a pro rata basis, generally over a one-, three-, or four-year period. In addition, upon termination of service, all vested awards must be exercised within 90 days after termination, or these awards will be forfeited. The equity awards have a 10-year10-year contractual term and have an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of the grant. As of December 31, 2018,2021, there were 5,218,31511,546,358 stock options, RSUs, and restricted stock unitsPSUs outstanding and 8,281,68510,953,924 shares available for future grants of equity awards under the 2018 EIP.

Share-based compensation expense was $113.4 million, $65.8 million, and $36.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

Performance-Based Stock Options

Performance-based option activity under the 2007 SIP, the 2013 SIP, and the 2018 EIP was as follows:

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
(per share)

 

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)

 

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)

 

Performance-based options outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

366,377

 

 

$

13.50

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

$

7.7

 

Exercised

 

 

(298,096

)

 

 

(13.48

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance-based options outstanding at December 31, 2019

 

 

68,281

 

 

$

13.58

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

$

3.7

 

Granted

 

 

1,818,728

 

 

 

65.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(42,730

)

 

 

(13.46

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance-based options outstanding at December 31, 2020

 

 

1,844,279

 

 

$

64.55

 

 

 

9.2

 

 

$

77.5

 

Exercised

 

 

(65,882

)

 

 

(47.23

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(1,347

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance-based options outstanding at December 31, 2021

 

 

1,777,050

 

 

$

64.72

 

 

 

8.3

 

 

$

70.6

 

Performance-based options exercisable at December 31, 2021

 

 

144,808

 

 

$

58.65

 

 

 

7.4

 

 

$

6.6

 

In 2020, 1,500,000 performance-based stock options (“Performance Option Award”) were granted under the 2018 EIP with an exercise price of $65.26. The vesting conditions for the Performance Option Award are based on the Company’s performance on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) with (i) 750,000 shares available to vest when the Company’s per share closing price on the NYSE meets or exceeds $110.94, or 1.7 times the exercise price, for ten consecutive trading days (“Performance Metric #1”) and (ii) the remaining 750,000 shares are available to vest when the Company’s per share closing price on the NYSE meets or exceeds $130.52, or 2.0 times the exercise price, for ten consecutive trading days (“Performance Metric #2”, collectively with Performance Metric #1, the “Performance Metrics”). The vesting conditions of the Performance Metrics must be achieved prior to May 8, 2025, or any unvested portion of the Performance Option Award will terminate. Further, no portion of the Performance Option Award will vest and become exercisable until May 8, 2023, the third anniversary of the Grant Date (the “Time-Based Metric”). The shares underlying Performance Metric #1, which was achieved on October 6, 2021, will vest and become exercisable on May 8, 2023 provided that continuous employment is maintained through that date. If Performance Metric #2 is met prior to satisfying the Time-Based Metric, the shares underlying Performance Metric #2 will vest and become exercisable on May 8, 2023 provided that continuous employment is maintained through that date. If the Time-Based Metric is met and Performance Metric #2 has not been met on or prior to May 8, 2025, the Performance Option Award will be terminated. A Monte Carlo simulation model was used to determine the fair value of these performance-based stock options. The Monte Carlo model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market conditions stipulated in the award. We have estimated an expected term of 5.3 years, based on the vesting period and contractual term.

The remaining performance-based stock options granted during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, under the 2018 EIP primarily include vesting conditions based on migrations of customers to Dayforce.

85 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

There are 2 tranches of stock options, in which the vesting conditions must be met either prior to September 13, 2021, or September 13, 2022. The weighted average grant date fair value of these performance-based stock options granted in 2020 was $16.03 per share.

As of December 31, 2021, there was $7.5 million of share-based compensation expense related to unvested performance-based stock option awards not yet recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years.

Term-Based Stock Options

Term-based stock option activity under the 2007 SIP, the 2013 SIP, and the 2018 EIP, was as follows:

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
(per share)

 

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)

 

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)

 

Term-based options outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

13,549,769

 

 

$

19.28

 

 

 

7.5

 

 

$

206.8

 

Granted

 

 

4,297,472

 

 

 

49.74

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(4,358,867

)

 

 

(17.37

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(343,437

)

 

 

(24.14

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term-based options outstanding at December 31, 2019

 

 

13,144,937

 

 

$

29.74

 

 

 

7.8

 

 

$

501.3

 

Granted

 

 

2,282,334

 

 

 

66.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(3,889,096

)

 

 

(20.42

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(555,101

)

 

 

(32.09

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term-based options outstanding at December 31, 2020

 

 

10,983,074

 

 

$

40.47

 

 

 

7.8

 

 

$

725.9

 

Granted

 

 

759,126

 

 

 

84.07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(2,942,465

)

 

 

(26.71

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(283,866

)

 

 

(48.62

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term-based options outstanding at December 31, 2021

 

 

8,515,869

 

 

$

48.87

 

 

 

7.3

 

 

$

473.4

 

Term-based options exercisable at December 31, 2021

 

 

3,236,026

 

 

$

40.48

 

 

 

6.7

 

 

$

207.0

 

Other information pertaining to term-based options was as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Weighted average grant date fair value per share

 

$

33.09

 

 

$

21.15

 

 

$

16.12

 

The fair value of the term-based stock options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Expected volatility

 

 

35.8

%

 

 

29.8

%

 

 

24.9

%

Expected dividend rate

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.3

%

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

2.5

%

For stock options granted under the 2013 SIP and 2018 EIP, we estimated an expected term of 7.0 years, based on the vesting period and contractual life. As of December 31, 2021, there was $66.4 million of share-based compensation expense related to unvested term-based awards not yet recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years. As of December 31, 2021, there were 3,236,026 vested term-based stock options.

86 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Units

RSU activity under the 2013 SIP and the 2018 EIP, was as follows:

Shares

RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2018

664,073

Granted

193,033

Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs

(17,288

)

Forfeited or canceled

(20,000

)

RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2019

819,818

Granted

685,997

Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs

(73,475

)

Forfeited or canceled

(42,955

)

RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2020

1,389,385

Granted

890,852

Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs

(262,239

)

Forfeited or canceled

(82,059

)

RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2021

1,935,939

RSUs releasable at December 31, 2021

597,936

Other information pertaining to RSUs was as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Weighted average grant date fair value per share

 

$

85.08

 

 

$

69.57

 

 

$

50.00

 

During the year ended December 31, 2021, 436,696 RSUs vested, of which 262,239 shares of common stock were issued. As of December 31, 2021, there were 597,936 RSUs vested and releasable. RSUs generally vest quarterly or annually over a one-, three-, or four-year period. As of December 31, 2021, there was $76.3 million of share-based compensation expense related to unvested RSUs not yet recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years.

Performance Stock Units

PSU activity under the 2018 EIP was as follows:

Shares

PSUs outstanding at December 31, 2019

0

Granted

145,017

Forfeited or canceled

(9,797

)

PSUs outstanding at December 31, 2020

135,220

Granted

348,483

Shares issued upon vesting of PSUs

(2,050

)

Forfeited or canceled

(162,908

)

PSUs outstanding at December 31, 2021

318,745

PSUs releasable at December 31, 2021

0

The vesting conditions for the PSUs granted in 2020 were based on the Company’s performance against Cloud revenue and adjusted EBITDA margin goals under Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. 2020 Management Incentive Plan (the “2020 MIP”) for the incentive period of January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. The vesting conditions for the PSUs were not met for the 2020 incentive period and as a result, the PSUs did 0t vest and 0 share-based compensation expense was recognized for these awards during the year ended December 31, 2020.

The vesting conditions for the PSUs granted in 2021 are based on the Company’s performance criteria, including Cloud revenue and adjusted EBITDA margin goals under the Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. 2021 Management Incentive Plan (the "2021 MIP”) for the incentive period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. The maximum incentive vesting of PSUs may not exceed 150% under the 2021 MIP. Both the Cloud

87 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

revenue and adjusted EBITDA margin goals are calculated based on the Company’s operating results, adjusted for foreign currency and interest rate impacts plus other unique impacts as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Upon vesting of a PSU, a participant will receive shares of common stock of the Company. Based on the performance criteria achieved, most of the PSUs are expected to vest in March 2022 and share-based compensation was recognized in accordance with the achievement level. As of December 31, 2021, there was $7.6 million of share-based compensation expense related to unvested PSUs not recognized related to certain executives with PSUs that have a three-year vesting period.

Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On November 9, 2018, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “GESPP”), which authorizes the issuance of up to 2,500,000 shares of common stock to eligible participants through purchases via payroll deductions at a discount todeductions. The purchase price is the lower of (i) 85% of the fair market value of oura share of common stock.stock on the offering date (the first trading day of the offering period commencing on January 1 and concluding on December 31) or (ii) 85% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the purchase date. The GESPP has a 10-year contractual term, and purchases will commence in 2019, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders.  

Share-based compensation expense was $24.7, $16.1, and $12.5shall continue for theten years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Performance-Based Stock Options

Performance-based option activity, unless terminated sooner as provided under the 2007 SIPGESPP. In 2021, quarterly purchase periods commenced on January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1. Shares were purchased on the 2013 SIP forlast trading day of the periods presentedrespective purchase periods. During 2021, shares were purchased on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31.

Our GESPP activity was as follows:

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

(per share)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term

(in years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

(in millions)

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2015

 

 

1,283,368

 

 

$

13.46

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

$

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(52,942

)

 

 

(13.46

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

 

1,230,426

 

 

$

13.46

 

 

 

4.2

 

 

$

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(167,202

)

(a)

 

(13.46

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(25,077

)

 

 

(13.46

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

1,038,147

 

 

$

13.46

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

$

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(663,412

)

 

 

(13.46

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(8,358

)

 

 

(13.46

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

366,377

 

 

$

13.50

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

$

7.7

 

Options exercisable at December 31, 2018

 

 

366,377

 

 

$

13.50

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

$

7.7

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Shares issued

 

 

153,235

 

 

 

182,899

 

Weighted average purchase price (per share)

 

$

81.69

 

 

$

54.90

 

(a)

During the year ended December 31, 2017, certain performance-based options were modified and exercised.


The performance criteria for all outstanding performance-based stock options was met on June 7, 2018, resulting in the vesting of all outstanding performance-based stock options on this date. We recognized $4.8 of share-based compensation expense related to the vesting of these performance-based stock options during the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2018, there was no share-based compensation expense related to unvested performance-based stock options not yet recognized.

Term-Based Stock Options

Term-based option activity, including stock options under the 2007 SIP, the 2013 SIP and the 2018 EIP, for the periods presented was as follows:

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

(per share)

 

 

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term

(in years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

(in millions)

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2015

 

 

7,609,658

 

 

$

16.02

 

 

 

7.3

 

 

$

14.1

 

Granted

 

 

2,339,238

 

 

 

16.80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(176,626

)

 

 

(16.54

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

 

9,772,270

 

 

$

16.20

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

$

9.9

 

Granted

 

 

2,285,981

 

 

 

17.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(595,464

)

 

 

(15.14

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(468,606

)

 

 

(16.10

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

10,994,181

 

 

$

16.52

 

 

 

6.9

 

 

$

48.8

 

Granted

 

 

5,236,037

 

 

 

23.07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(2,501,983

)

 

 

(15.26

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(178,466

)

 

 

(17.30

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

13,549,769

 

 

$

19.28

 

 

 

7.5

��

 

$

206.8

 

Options exercisable at December 31, 2018

 

 

5,731,295

 

 

$

16.75

 

 

 

5.7

 

 

$

101.7

 

Other information pertaining to term-based options is as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Weighted average grant date fair value per share

 

$

7.80

 

 

$

5.88

 

 

$

5.74

 

The fair value of the term-based stock optionspurchase rights granted under the GESPP was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

2020

 

Expected volatility

 

 

33.7

%

 

46.4

%

Expected dividend rate

 

 

0

 

 

0

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

0.1

%

 

1.1

%

Expected term (in years)

 

 

0.3

 

 

0.3

 

Grant date fair value per share

 

$

22.07

 

$

17.11

 

88 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Expected volatility

 

 

25.0

%

 

 

30.0

%

 

 

30.0

%

Expected dividend rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

2.9

%

 

 

2.3

%

 

 

1.9

%

12. Revenue

For stock options granted under the 2007 SIP, we used the simplified method to estimate the expected term of the stock options. For stock options granted under the 2013 SIP and 2018 EIP, we estimated an expected term of 7.0 years, based on the vesting period and contractual life. As of December 31, 2018, there was $46.6 of share-based compensation expense related to unvested term-based awards not yet recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years. As of December 31, 2018, there were 5,731,295 vested term-based stock options.


Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) activity, including RSUs under the 2013 SIP and the 2018 EIP, for the periods presented was as follows:

Shares

RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2015

228,572

Granted

29,800

Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs

(76,192

)

Forfeited or canceled

RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2016

182,180

Granted

500,000

Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs

(76,190

)

Forfeited or canceled

RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2017

605,990

Granted

164,073

Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs

(105,990

)

Forfeited or canceled

RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2018

664,073

RSUs releasable at December 31, 2018

125,000

Other information pertaining to restricted stock units is as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Weighted average grant date fair value per share

 

$

35.55

 

 

$

17.26

 

 

$

17.40

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, 230,990 RSUs vested, of which 105,990 shares of common stock were issued, and 125,000 RSUs remained vested and releasable. Restricted stock units generally vest annually over a three- or four-year period. As of December 31, 2018, there was $9.9 of share-based compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units not yet recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years.

12. Supplementary Data to Statements of Operations

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Other (Income) Expense, Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset impairment

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

10.4

 

Environmental reserve

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.9

 

Foreign currency translation (income) expense

 

 

(2.9

)

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

(3.4

)

Total other (income) expense, net

 

$

(2.9

)

 

$

7.3

 

 

$

12.9

 

Asset Impairment

The sale of the UK Business in 2016 was considered a triggering event to test the trade name intangible asset for impairment. Given the reduction in future revenues of the UK Business previously included in the relief from royalty models used to support the trade name value, we recorded an impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2016, of $10.2 to the trade name intangible asset. The remaining impairment amount is related to immaterial asset write-offs.


Environmental Reserve

In September 1989, Parent’s predecessor entered into an Environmental Matters Agreement (“EMA”) with Seagate Technology plc (“Seagate”) related to groundwater contamination on a parcel of real estate sold by Parent’s predecessor to Seagate. Ceridian is now responsible for the EMA. The EMA requires expense sharing between Ceridian and Seagate for the remediation of groundwater contamination up to a certain limit. Based on additional information obtained with respect to more stringent remediation requirements, we updated our estimate of the potential liability related to the EMA, resulting in an increase to the environmental reserve of $5.9 during the year ended December 31, 2016, which represented the limit under the EMA. Please refer to Note 15, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for further discussion of our environmental liabilities.

Foreign Currency Translation (Income) Expense

We had foreign currency translation income of $2.9 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The foreign currency translation income for the year ended December 31, 2018, was primarily related to foreign currency remeasurement gains resulting from an intercompany payable of a U.S. operating subsidiary which is repaid in Canadian dollars. This intercompany payable was repaid in the second quarter of 2018.

We incurred foreign currency translation expense of $7.3 for the year ended December 31, 2017. The foreign currency translation expense for the year ended December 31, 2017, was primarily related to foreign currency remeasurement losses resulting from an intercompany payable of a U.S. operating subsidiary which is repaid in Canadian dollars.

We had foreign currency translation income of $3.4 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The foreign currency translation income for the year ended December 31, 2016, was primarily related to foreign currency remeasurement gains on intercompany receivables and payables between international subsidiaries that were settled in early 2017.

13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

 

 

Foreign

Currency

Translation

Adjustment

 

 

Unrealized Gain

(Loss) from

Invested

Customer Trust

Funds

 

 

Pension

Liability

Adjustment

 

 

Total

 

Balance as of December 31, 2016

 

$

(199.9

)

 

$

4.7

 

 

$

(156.3

)

 

$

(351.5

)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before income

   taxes and reclassifications

 

 

39.3

 

 

 

(17.3

)

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

25.7

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

 

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.6

 

Reclassifications to earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

 

 

10.1

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to

   Ceridian

 

 

39.3

 

 

 

(13.7

)

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

39.4

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

 

(160.6

)

 

 

(9.0

)

 

 

(142.5

)

 

 

(312.1

)

Other comprehensive loss before income

   taxes and reclassifications

 

 

(47.4

)

 

 

(10.5

)

 

 

(19.3

)

 

 

(77.2

)

Income tax benefit

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

Reclassifications to earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.7

 

 

 

11.7

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income attributable to

   Ceridian

 

 

(47.4

)

 

 

(9.3

)

 

 

(7.6

)

 

 

(64.3

)

LifeWorks Disposition

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7

 

Balance as of December 31, 2018

 

$

(207.3

)

 

$

(18.3

)

 

$

(150.1

)

 

$

(375.7

)


14. Income Taxes

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Components of Earnings and Taxes from Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

(73.2

)

 

$

(83.4

)

 

$

(163.4

)

International

 

 

42.8

 

 

 

29.3

 

 

 

64.8

 

Total

 

$

(30.4

)

 

$

(54.1

)

 

$

(98.6

)

Income Tax Expense (Benefit):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

3.8

 

 

$

(0.3

)

 

$

(0.4

)

State and local

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

International

 

 

20.4

 

 

 

12.9

 

 

 

15.2

 

Total current income tax expense

 

 

24.5

 

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

15.0

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

(14.4

)

 

 

(60.3

)

 

 

(15.7

)

State and local

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

(0.1

)

International

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(2.8

)

 

 

7.5

 

Total deferred income tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(16.8

)

 

 

(62.3

)

 

 

(8.3

)

Total income tax expense (benefit)

 

$

7.7

 

 

$

(49.6

)

 

$

6.7

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Effective Rate Reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. statutory rate%

 

 

(21.0

)%

 

 

(35.0

)%

 

 

(35.0

)%

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

(116.9

)

 

 

(5.4

)

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

 

 

(27.9

)

 

 

(5.2

)

 

 

(1.2

)

Share-based compensation

 

 

(8.8

)

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

2.6

 

International tax rate differential

 

 

11.5

 

 

 

(6.7

)

 

 

(6.4

)

Foreign dividend income

 

 

17.8

 

 

 

48.1

 

 

 

1.0

 

Foreign capital gain income

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unremitted foreign earnings

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

(35.6

)

 

 

22.0

 

Global intangible low-taxed income

 

 

20.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base erosion tax

 

 

12.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reserve for tax contingencies

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

Expiration of un-utilized tax credits

 

 

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.7

 

Change in tax rate

 

 

(5.2

)

 

 

52.4

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

(2.6

)

 

 

(1.5

)

Income tax provision%

 

 

25.3

%

 

 

(91.7

)%

 

 

6.6

%

Our income tax provision represents federal, state, and international taxes on our income recognized for financial statement purposes and includes the effects of temporary differences between financial statement income and income recognized for tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities as adjusted for the expected benefits of utilizing net operating loss carryforwards. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to reflect the net deferred tax assets that we believe will be realized.  In assessing the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, including historical levels of pre-tax book income, expiration of net operating losses, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, as well as current tax laws. As of December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017, we continue to record a full valuation allowance against our domestic deferred tax assets that are not offset by the reversal of deferred tax liabilities. In the future, if it is determined that we no longer have a requirement to record a valuation allowance against all or a portion of our deferred tax assets, the release of the valuation allowance would have a positive impact on our income tax provision.


On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cut and Jobs Act legislation (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law. The Tax Act made broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code including: (a) lower U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, (b) accelerated expensing of qualified capital investments for a specific period, and (c) a transition from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system.

ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires a company to record the effects of a tax law change in the period of enactment; however, shortly after enactment of the Tax Act, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 118, which allows a company to record a provisional amount when it does not have the necessary information available to complete its accounting for the change in the tax law. The FASB subsequently issued ASU No. 2018-05 to codify SAB 118 by amending ASC 740. ASU No. 2018-05 continues to allow a company to record a provisional amount when it does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete its accounting for the change in the tax law. The measurement period ends when the company has obtained, prepared, and analyzed the information necessary to finalize its accounting, but cannot extend beyond one year.

We have completed our analysis of the income tax effects of the Tax Act.  In January and April of 2018, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) issued guidance that provided additional clarification on certain aspects of the transition tax calculation. The application of the additional IRS guidance resulted in a $16.2 increase in includible untaxed foreign earnings, which resulted in a $5.7 increase in tax expense. This increase was offset by the tax benefit of the utilization of $16.2 of net operating loss carryover. The overall impact to tax expense in the year ended December 31, 2018, was zero.

Other provisions introduced by the Tax Act that had a significant impact on our current year tax provision were the provisions introducing the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) and the Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (“BEAT”).  The GILTI resulted in an increase of $29.7 in taxable income, which resulted in a $6.6 increase in tax expense. This tax increase was offset by the tax benefit of the utilization of $29.7 of net operating loss carryover. The BEAT resulted in an increase of $3.8 in tax expense in the year ended December 31, 2018.    

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Tax Effect of Items That Comprise a Significant

   Portion of the Net Deferred Tax Asset and Deferred

   Tax Liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Tax Asset:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employment related accruals

 

$

51.2

 

 

$

51.0

 

Foreign tax credit carryover and other credit

   carryovers

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.2

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

78.2

 

 

 

100.3

 

Total gross deferred tax asset

 

 

129.7

 

 

 

151.5

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(93.3

)

 

 

(90.7

)

Total deferred tax asset

 

$

36.4

 

 

$

60.8

 

Deferred Tax Liability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangibles

 

$

(62.1

)

 

$

(65.7

)

Unremitted foreign earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on investment

 

 

 

 

 

(22.2

)

Other

 

 

(5.8

)

 

 

(5.0

)

Total deferred tax liability

 

 

(67.9

)

 

 

(92.9

)

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(31.5

)

 

$

(32.1

)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net Deferred Tax by Geography

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

(19.8

)

 

$

(18.4

)

International

 

 

(11.7

)

 

 

(13.7

)

Total

 

$

(31.5

)

 

$

(32.1

)


As of December 31, 2018, we had federal, state, and foreign net operating loss carryovers, which will reduce future taxable income when utilized. Approximately $47.2 in net federal tax benefit is available from the loss carryovers and an additional $0.3 is available in federal tax credit carryovers. The state loss carryovers will result in state tax benefit of approximately $31.0 when utilized. The federal net operating loss tax benefit will begin to expire in 2031, and state net operating loss carryovers will begin to expire in 2019. The federal credit carryovers are composed of foreign tax credits, which will begin to expire in 2019; research credits, which will begin to expire in 2027; and alternative minimum tax credits, which have no expiration date.

As of December 31, 2018, we carried a full valuation allowance against our domestic net deferred tax asset (“DTA”) position after excluding a portion of the deferred tax liability for long-lived, non-amortizable taxable temporary differences. We periodically re-assess the likelihood that DTA reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements will be recovered from future taxable income.

We have re-evaluated the likelihood of recovering our net DTA, and we have determined that it is still more likely than not that the tax benefit associated with a portion of the DTA will not be realized. We assessed the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing net DTAs not already identified as requiring a valuation allowance. The cumulative loss incurred over the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, is a significant piece of objective negative evidence. Such objective evidence limits the ability to consider other subjective evidence, such as our projections for positive future growth. As of December 31, 2018, we had a total valuation allowance of $93.3. The amount of the DTA considered realizable could be adjusted in the future if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present, and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence, such as our projections for growth.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With a few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2014.

The following table summarizes the activity for unrecognized tax benefits:

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Federal, State and Foreign Tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning unrecognized tax balance

 

$

1.5

 

 

$

1.4

 

Increase prior period positions

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

Increase current period positions

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

Decrease prior period positions

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

 

Decrease current period positions

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

 

Statutes expiring

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.2

)

Ending unrecognized tax benefits

 

$

1.3

 

 

$

1.5

 

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2018, was $1.3 including $0.2 of accrued interest and penalty. Of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, $1.3 represents the amount that, if recognized, would impact our effective income tax rate as of December 31, 2018. It is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next 12 months; however, we cannot reasonably estimate the amount of the change. We do not expect the change to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

The Tax Act imposed a mandatory transition tax on the unremitted earnings of our international subsidiaries and generally eliminated US taxes on foreign subsidiary distributions for years beginning after December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, we have $298.5 of unremitted foreign earnings. We consider $174.6 of the unremitted earnings to be indefinitely reinvested. For the portion of the unremitted earnings not considered indefinitely reinvested, $123.9, we have provided a deferred tax liability of $6.2, which represents the expected withholding tax cost of repatriating such earnings. In the event the portion of the unremitted earnings considered to be indefinitely reinvested were repatriated, we would incur a withholding tax expense of approximately $8.7.   


15. Commitments and Contingencies

Leasing

We conduct substantially all of our operations in leased facilities. Most of our leases contain renewal options and require payments for taxes, insurance and maintenance. We recognize rent holidays, including the time period during which we have access to the property for construction of improvements, construction allowances and escalating rent provisions on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

Substantially all of our leasing arrangements for equipment and facilities are operating leases and the rental payments under these leases are charged to operations as incurred. The amounts in the accompanying tables do not include capital lease obligations recorded as liabilities.

Our rental expense and sublease income were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Rental Expense, Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental expense

 

$

17.6

 

 

$

17.0

 

 

$

16.8

 

Sublease rental income

 

 

(4.9

)

 

 

(4.2

)

 

 

(3.5

)

Net rental expense

 

$

12.7

 

 

$

12.8

 

 

$

13.3

 

Our future minimum noncancellable lease payments on existing operating leases at December 31, 2018, which have an initial term of more than one year, are as follows:

Years Ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

2019

 

$

13.6

 

2020

 

 

11.8

 

2021

 

 

7.7

 

2022

 

 

7.4

 

2023

 

 

6.2

 

Thereafter

 

 

9.4

 

Total (a)

 

$

56.1

 

(a)

Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $13.1 due in the future under noncancellable subleases.  

Environmental Matters

We accrue for losses associated with environmental remediation obligations when such losses are probable and reasonably estimable. Accruals for estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than completion of the remedial feasibility study. Such accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value.

In February 1988, Parent’s predecessor entered into an arrangement with Northern Engraving Corporation (“NEC”) and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) in relation to groundwater contamination on a parcel of real estate sold by Parent’s predecessor to NEC. Ceridian is now responsible for the arrangement with NEC and the MPCA. The arrangement requires expense sharing between Ceridian and NEC for the remediation of groundwater contamination.

In September 1989, Parent’s predecessor entered into an EMA with Seagate related to groundwater contamination on a parcel of real estate sold by Parent’s predecessor to Seagate. Ceridian is now responsible for the EMA. The EMA requires expense sharing between Ceridian and Seagate for the remediation of groundwater contamination up to a certain limit. Based on additional information obtained with respect to more stringent remediation requirements, we updated our estimate of the potential liability related to the EMA, resulting in an increase to the environmental reserve of $5.9 for the year ended December 31, 2016, which represented the limit under the EMA.


We have recognized an undiscounted liability of approximately $5.2 and $5.4 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheets to comply with the NEC arrangement and EMA described above. The ultimate cost, however, will depend on the extent of continued monitoring activities as these projects progress. Please refer to Note 12, “Supplementary Data to Statements of Operations,” for further discussion of changes in the liability during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Legal Matters

We are subject to claims and a number of judicial and administrative proceedings considered normal in the course of our current and past operations, including employment-related disputes, contract disputes, disputes with our competitors, intellectual property disputes, government audits and proceedings, customer disputes, and tort claims. In some proceedings, the claimant seeks damages as well as other relief, which, if granted, would require substantial expenditures on our part.

Our general terms and conditions in customer contracts frequently include a provision indicating we will indemnify and hold our customers harmless from and against any and all claims alleging that the services and materials furnished by us violate any third party’s patent, trade secret, copyright or other intellectual property right. We are not aware of any material pending litigation concerning these indemnifications.

Some of these matters raise difficult and complex factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties, including the facts and circumstances of each particular action, and the jurisdiction, forum, and law under which each action is proceeding. Because of these complexities, final disposition of some of these proceedings may not occur for several years. As such, we are not always able to estimate the amount of our possible future liabilities, if any.

There can be no certainty that we may not ultimately incur charges in excess of presently established or future financial accruals or insurance coverage. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, it is management’s opinion that the final disposition of these proceedings will not, considering the merits of the claims and available resources or reserves and insurance, and based upon the facts and circumstances currently known, have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

16. Related Party Transactions

Management Agreements

Prior to our IPO, Ceridian was party to management agreements with affiliates of our Sponsors, Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (“FNF”) and THL Managers VI, LLC (“THLM”). FNF assigned its management agreement to Cannae in November 2017. Pursuant to these management agreements, Cannae and THLM each, respectively, agreed to provide the Company with financial advisory, strategic, and general oversight services. These management agreements provided that we pay annual management fees to each of Cannae and THLM in an amount equal to the greater of (a) $0.9, or (b) 0.5 percent of Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA, for purposes of the management agreements, is EBITDA as defined in the 2014 Senior Secured Credit Facility, further adjusted to exclude the payments made pursuant to the management agreements and certain stock options or other equity compensation.

In April 2018, the management agreements terminated upon consummation of our IPO. Upon termination, the management agreements provided that we pay a termination fee equal to the net present value of the management fee for a seven-year period, which was $11.3.

We recorded a management fee expense in selling, general, and administrative expense of $12.0, $1.9, and $5.0 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, related to these management agreements. The expense for the year ended December 31, 2016, included transaction advisory fees of $3.0 related to the issuance of the senior convertible participating preferred stock. Please refer to Note 18, “Capital Stock,” for further discussion of this transaction.

Indebtedness

Prior to its split-off from FNF, Cannae was an affiliate of FNF. FNF and its subsidiaries owned $24.0 of the Senior Notes as of December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Based on this ownership, $1.3, $3.2, and $3.2 in interest payments were made to affiliates of Cannae during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The affiliates of Cannae conducted the debt transactions through third parties in the ordinary course of their business and not directly with us. Following Cannae’s split-off from FNF, FNF retained ownership of the Senior Notes.


Service and Vendor Related Agreements

Ceridian is a party to a service agreement with CompuCom Systems, Inc. (“CompuCom”), an investment portfolio company of THL Partners. Pursuant to the service agreement, CompuCom agrees to provide us with service desk and desk side support services. Pursuant to this arrangement, we made payments to CompuCom totaling $1.8, $3.1, and $5.0 during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

Other Transactions

On July 23, 2018, Ronald F. Clarke was appointed to our Board of Directors. Mr. Clarke has been the chief executive officer of FleetCor Technologies Inc. (“FleetCor Technologies”) since August 2000 and its chairman of the board of directors since March 2003. We provide services to FleetCor Technologies or one of its wholly owned affiliates through certain commercial arrangements entered into in the ordinary course of business, which include provision of Dayforce HCM services, reseller or referral arrangements whereby we resell or refer FleetCor Technologies services to its customers, and other administrative services. For these services, we have recorded revenue of $2.3 and $2.9 for the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2017, respectively. We are also a corporate charge card customer of FleetCor Technologies. FleetCor Technologies receives a fee from the merchants from whom purchases are made on the FleetCor Technologies corporate charge card by us. In connection with charge card purchases made by us, FleetCor Technologies has provided us with rebates of approximately $0.2 for year ended December 31, 2017.

We provide Dayforce and related services to The Stronach Group, for which we recorded revenue of $0.3 and $0.2 for the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2016, respectively. Alon Ossip, the brother of David Ossip, was the chief executive officer, and is currently a minority shareholder, of The Stronach Group.

We provide payroll-related tax filing services to FNF for which we recorded revenue of $0.4, $0.5, and $0.3 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

We provide Dayforce and related services to certain investment portfolio companies of THLM and Cannae.  We recorded revenue of $1.8 million from American Blue Ribbon Holdings, LLC; $0.5 million from Essex Bargain Hunt Superstores; $0.5 million from Guaranteed Rate; $0.3 million from Phillips Feed Services; and $0.3 million from System One Holdings LLC for the year ended December 31, 2018.

17. Segments and Financial Data by Solution and Geographic Area

Segments

After consideration of the LifeWorks Disposition, management has concluded that we have one operating and reportable segment. This conclusion aligns with how management monitors operating performance, allocates resources, and deploys capital. Please refer to Note 3, “Discontinued Operations,” for further discussion of the LifeWorks Disposition.

Our Solutions

We categorize our solutions into two categories: Cloud and Bureau offerings.

Cloud revenue is generated from HCM solutions that are delivered via two cloud offerings: Dayforce and Powerpay. The Dayforce offering is differentiated from our market competition as being a single application that offers a comprehensive range of functionality, including global HR, payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management on web and native iOS and Android platforms. Dayforce provides continuous real-time calculations across all modules to enable, for example, payroll administrators access to data through the entire pay period, and managers access to real-time data to optimize work schedules. Dayforce revenue is primarily generated from monthly recurring fees charged on a PEPM basis, generally one-month in advance of service. We also provide outsourced human resource solutions to certain of our Dayforce customers, which are tailored to meet their individual needs, and entail performing the duties of a customer’s human resources department, including payroll processing, time and labor management, performance management, and recruiting, as needed.  Also included within Dayforce revenue is implementation, staging, and other professional services revenue; revenues from the sale, rental, and maintenance of time clocks; and billable travel expenses. The Powerpay offering is our solution designed primarily for small market Canadian customers. The typical Powerpay customer has fewer than 20 employees, and the majority of the revenue is generated from recurring fees charged on a per-employee, per-process basis. Typical processes include the customer’s payroll runs, year-end tax packages, and

Cloud revenue is generated from solutions that are delivered via 2 cloud offerings, Dayforce and Powerpay. The Dayforce offering is a single application with continuous calculation that offers a comprehensive range of functionality, including global HR, payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent management on web and native iOS and Android platforms. Dayforce recurring revenue is primarily generated from monthly recurring fees charged on a per-employee, per-month (“PEPM”) basis and the allocation of investment income generated from holding Dayforce customer funds before funds are remitted to taxing authorities, Dayforce customer employees, or other third parties. Dayforce professional services and other revenue is primarily generated from implementation and post go-live professional services revenue. Other sources of Dayforce revenues include revenue from the sale, rental and maintenance of time clocks; revenue from the sale of third-party services; billable travel expenses for Dayforce customers, and Dayforce Wallet interchange fee revenue. The Powerpay offering is our solution designed primarily for small market Canadian customers, which typically have fewer than 20 employees. Powerpay recurring revenue is primarily generated from recurring fees charged on a per-employee, per-process basis and the allocation of investment income generated from holding Powerpay customer funds before funds are remitted to taxing authorities, Powerpay customer employees, or other third parties. Typical processes include the customer’s payroll runs, year-end tax packages, and delivery of customers’ remittance advices or checks. Powerpay professional services revenue is primarily generated from the setup of the Powerpay customer on their platform.

delivery of customers’ remittance advices or checks. In addition to the direct revenue earned from the Dayforce and Powerpay offerings, Cloud revenue also includes investment income generated from holding Cloud customer funds in trust before funds are remitted to taxing authorities, Cloud customer employees, or other third parties; and revenue from the sale of third party services.

Bureau revenue is generated primarily from HCM solutions delivered via a service-bureau model. These solutions are delivered via three3 primary service lines: payroll, payroll-related tax filing services, and outsourced human resource solutions. Revenue from payroll services is generated from recurring fees charged on a per-process basis. Typical processes include the customer’s payroll runs, year-end tax packages, and delivery of customers’ remittance advices or checks. In addition to customers who use our payroll services, certain customers use our tax filing services on a stand-alone basis. Our outsourced human resource solutions are tailored to meet the needs of individual customers, and entail our contracting to perform many of the duties of a customer’s human resources department, including payroll processing, time and labor management, performance management, and recruiting. We also perform individual services for customers, such as check printing, wage attachment and disbursement, and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) management. Additional items included in Bureau revenue are fees for custom professional services revenue;to Bureau customers; the allocation of investment income generated from holding Bureau customer funds in trust before funds are remitted to taxing authorities, Bureau customer employees, or other third parties; consulting services related to Bureau offerings; and revenue from the sale of third party services.

services to Bureau customers; and Excelity revenue.

Revenue by solution is as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Cloud

 

$

534.3

 

 

$

404.3

 

 

$

297.8

 

Bureau

 

 

212.1

 

 

 

266.5

 

 

 

325.6

 

Total revenue

 

$

746.4

 

 

$

670.8

 

 

$

623.4

 

Geographic and Customer Information

NoNaN single customer accounts for 1%1% or more of our consolidated revenue for any of the periods presented.

89 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Disaggregation of Revenue

Revenue by country issolution and category was as follows.  follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cloud

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dayforce

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring

 

$

626.6

 

 

$

500.2

 

 

$

429.0

 

Professional services and other

 

 

159.3

 

 

 

148.6

 

 

 

140.7

 

Total Dayforce revenue

 

 

785.9

 

 

 

648.8

 

 

 

569.7

 

Powerpay

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring

 

 

86.3

 

 

 

79.5

 

 

 

89.0

 

Professional services and other

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

1.3

 

Total Powerpay revenue

 

 

87.2

 

 

 

80.6

 

 

 

90.3

 

Total Cloud revenue

 

 

873.1

 

 

 

729.4

 

 

 

660.0

 

Bureau

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring

 

 

137.8

 

 

 

110.5

 

 

 

162.1

 

Professional services and other

 

 

13.3

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

2.0

 

Total Bureau revenue

 

 

151.1

 

 

 

113.1

 

 

 

164.1

 

Total revenue

 

$

1,024.2

 

 

$

842.5

 

 

$

824.1

 

Recurring revenue includes float revenue of $41.1 million, $52.3 million, and $80.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

Revenue by Geographic Area

The country in which the revenue is recorded is determined by the legal entity with which the customer has contracted.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

United States

 

$

518.5

 

 

$

465.2

 

 

$

432.7

 

Canada

 

 

224.7

 

 

 

203.4

 

 

 

189.0

 

Other

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

1.7

 

Total revenue

 

$

746.4

 

 

$

670.8

 

 

$

623.4

 

Long-lived assetsRevenue by country iswas as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

United States

 

$

624.4

 

 

$

579.3

 

 

$

578.1

 

Canada

 

 

254.2

 

 

 

223.5

 

 

 

237.0

 

Other

 

 

145.6

 

 

 

39.7

 

 

 

9.0

 

Total revenue

 

$

1,024.2

 

 

$

842.5

 

 

$

824.1

 

Contract Balances

The Company records a contract asset when revenue recognized for professional services performance obligations exceed the contractual amount of billings for implementation related professional services. Contract assets were $62.7 million and $55.2 million as of December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Contract assets expected to be recognized in revenue within twelve months are included within Prepaid expenses and other current assets, with the remaining contract assets included within Other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.

90 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Deferred Revenue

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

United States

 

$

1,778.7

 

 

$

1,786.1

 

Canada

 

 

438.1

 

 

 

480.6

 

Other

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

2.8

 

Total long-lived assets

 

$

2,219.3

 

 

$

2,269.5

 

Deferred revenue primarily consists of payments received in advance of revenue recognition. The changes in deferred revenue were as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Deferred revenue, beginning of period

 

$

24.4

 

 

$

25.5

 

New billings

 

 

565.0

 

 

 

432.6

 

Acquired billings

 

 

16.6

 

 

 

 

Revenue recognized

 

 

(556.5

)

 

 

(433.9

)

Effect of exchange rate

 

 

(0.8

)

 

 

0.2

 

Deferred revenue, end of period

 

$

48.7

 

 

$

24.4

 


18. Capital Stock

Transaction Price for Remaining Performance Obligations

In accordance with ASC Topic 606, the following represents the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of the end of the reporting period. As of October 1, 2013, CeridianDecember 31, 2021, approximately $1,118.5 million of revenue is expected to be recognized over the next three years from remaining performance obligations, which represents contracted revenue for recurring services and fixed price professional services, primarily implementation services, that has not yet been recognized, including deferred revenue and unbilled amounts that will be recognized as revenue in future periods. In accordance with the practical expedient provided in ASC Topic 606, performance obligations that are billed and recognized as they are delivered, primarily professional services contracts that are on a time and materials basis, are excluded from the transaction price for remaining performance obligations disclosed above.

13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

 

 

Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustment

 

 

Unrealized Gain
(Loss) from
Invested
Customer Funds

 

 

Pension
Liability
Adjustment

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Balance as of December 31, 2019

 

$

(178.4

)

 

$

10.2

 

 

$

(170.2

)

 

$

(338.4

)

Other comprehensive income before income taxes and reclassifications

 

 

18.7

 

 

 

38.4

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

65.1

 

Income tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

(10.2

)

 

 

(5.7

)

 

 

(15.9

)

Reclassifications to earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.2

 

 

 

13.2

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

18.7

 

 

 

28.2

 

 

 

15.5

 

 

 

62.4

 

Balance as of December 31, 2020

 

 

(159.7

)

 

 

38.4

 

 

 

(154.7

)

 

 

(276.0

)

Other comprehensive (loss) income before income taxes and reclassifications

 

 

(17.6

)

 

 

(48.4

)

 

 

(9.1

)

 

 

(75.1

)

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

 

 

 

12.8

 

 

 

(1.6

)

 

 

11.2

 

Reclassifications to earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.1

 

 

 

15.1

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(17.6

)

 

 

(35.6

)

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

(48.8

)

Balance as of December 31, 2021

 

$

(177.3

)

 

$

2.8

 

 

$

(150.3

)

 

$

(324.8

)

91 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

14. Income Taxes

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Components of Earnings and Taxes from Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

(73.6

)

 

$

41.5

 

 

$

25.9

 

International

 

 

(16.7

)

 

 

(61.6

)

 

 

8.4

 

Total

 

$

(90.3

)

 

$

(20.0

)

 

$

34.3

 

Income tax expense (benefit):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

0.9

 

 

$

(6.5

)

 

$

7.1

 

State and local

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.4

 

International

 

 

22.3

 

 

 

(2.6

)

 

 

17.5

 

Total current income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

23.6

 

 

 

(9.0

)

 

 

25.0

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

(22.3

)

 

 

(1.1

)

 

 

(42.6

)

State and local

 

 

(5.0

)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

(19.3

)

International

 

 

(11.2

)

 

 

(6.0

)

 

 

(7.5

)

Total deferred income tax benefit

 

 

(38.5

)

 

 

(7.0

)

 

 

(69.4

)

Total income tax benefit

 

$

(14.9

)

 

$

(16.0

)

 

$

(44.4

)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Effective Rate Reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. statutory rate%

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

21.0

%

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

(0.7

)

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(176.1

)

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

3.9

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

(3.5

)

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

(5.8

)

International tax rate differential

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

8.9

 

 

 

3.8

 

Foreign capital gain income

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(7.5

)

 

 

3.2

 

Unremitted foreign earnings

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

14.5

 

 

 

(2.0

)

Acquisition costs

 

 

(2.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base erosion tax

 

 

(1.6

)

 

 

33.9

 

 

 

19.9

 

Reserve for tax contingencies

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

(0.3

)

Change in tax rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.0

)

Unutilized tax benefits

 

 

(3.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

4.0

 

Income tax provision%

 

 

16.5

%

 

 

80.0

%

 

 

(129.4

)%

Our income tax provision represents federal, state, and international taxes on our income recognized for financial statement purposes and includes the effects of temporary differences between financial statement income and income recognized for tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to reflect the net deferred tax assets that we believe will be realized. In assessing the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, including historical levels of pre-tax book income, expiration of net operating losses, changes in our debt and equity structure, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income, ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, as well as current tax laws. As of December 31, 2021, we have a valuation allowance of $46.8 million against certain deferred tax assets consisting primarily of $14.0 million attributable to state net operating loss carryovers, and $31.0 million attributable to deferred tax assets recorded as part of the Ascender acquisition.

92 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Tax Effect of Items That Comprise a Significant Portion of the Net Deferred Tax Asset and Deferred Tax Liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax asset:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employment related accruals

 

$

16.9

 

 

$

9.8

 

Other

 

 

19.2

 

 

 

7.5

 

Foreign tax credit carryover and other credit
   carryovers

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.2

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

161.5

 

 

 

125.9

 

Total gross deferred tax asset

 

 

198.2

 

 

 

143.4

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(46.8

)

 

 

(16.3

)

Total deferred tax asset

 

$

151.4

 

 

$

127.1

 

Deferred tax liability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangibles

 

$

(64.8

)

 

$

(61.7

)

Deferred contract costs

 

 

(29.4

)

 

 

(27.7

)

Other

 

 

(24.6

)

 

 

(27.5

)

Total deferred tax liability

 

 

(118.8

)

 

 

(116.9

)

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

32.6

 

 

$

10.2

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Net Deferred Tax by Geography

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

38.9

 

 

$

22.0

 

International

 

 

(6.3

)

 

 

(11.8

)

Total

 

$

32.6

 

 

$

10.2

 

As of December 31, 2021, we had federal, state, and foreign net operating loss carryovers, which will reduce future taxable income when utilized. Approximately $105.1 million in net federal tax benefit is available from the loss carryovers and an additional $0.6 million is available in tax credit carryovers. $53.6 million of the federal net operating loss tax benefit will expire from 2031 to 2037. The remaining $51.5 million has an indefinite carryover period. The state loss carryovers and foreign loss carryovers will result in a tax benefit of approximately $38.7 million and $17.8 million, respectively, when utilized. The state net operating loss carryovers will begin to expire in 2022. The majority of the foreign operating loss carryovers have an indefinite carryover period. The $0.6 million tax credit carryover is composed of a variety of credits most of which expire between 2027 and 2038.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With a few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2017.

The following table summarizes the activity for unrecognized tax benefits:

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Federal, State and Foreign Tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning unrecognized tax balance

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

1.5

 

Increase prior period positions

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

Increase current period positions

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

Decrease prior period positions

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

 

Ending unrecognized tax benefits

 

$

 

 

$

1.8

 

93 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

There were 0 unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2021. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2020, were $1.8 million, including $0.3 million of accrued interest. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, we released $1.8 million of our reserve primarily attributable to the conclusion of foreign tax audits. We make adjustments to these reserves when facts and circumstances change, such as the closing of tax audits or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made and could have a material impact on our financial condition and operating results.

As of December 31, 2021, we have $322.9 million of unremitted foreign earnings. We consider all the unremitted earnings to be indefinitely reinvested. Because all unremitted earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested, no deferred tax liability has been recorded. In the event the unremitted earnings considered to be indefinitely reinvested were repatriated, we would incur a withholding tax expense of approximately $15.0 million.

15. Leases

Our leases primarily consist of office space. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet; we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For leases beginning 2019 and later, we account for lease components separately from the non-lease components.

Most leases include options to renew, and the lease renewal is at our sole discretion. Therefore, the depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements is limited by the expected lease term unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

We rent or sublease certain real estate to third parties. Our sublease portfolio mainly consists of operating leases for space within our office facilities.

As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 ("COVID-19") and our pivot to a virtual working environment, we evaluated our lease portfolio resulting in the decision to close certain office locations and transition the impacted employees to fully virtual work. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized $1.8 million of charges related to lease abandonment costs, and during the year end December 31, 2020, we recognized $16.8 million of charges, which was authorizedcomprised of $14.7 million of accelerated amortization of the right of use assets and $2.1 million of accelerated depreciation of leasehold improvements, related to issue 100,000,000 sharesthe abandonment of common stockthe leases associated with these office locations. These charges were recognized within selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

On December 15, 2021, we sold the office building, land, and fixed assets of our St. Petersburg, Florida facility for $40 million, less fees and expenses, resulting in a par valuegain on the sale of $0.01 per share$19.1 million, which was recognized in the consolidated statements of operations within selling, general, and 70,000,000 sharesadministrative expense. Upon the sale of junior convertible participating preferred stock (“Junior Preferred Stock”) with a par value of $0.01 per share. On March 30, 2016, the Board of Directors increased the number of authorized shares of common stock to 150,000,000 and authorized 70,000,000 shares of senior convertible participating preferred stock (“Senior Preferred Stock”) with a par value of $0.01 per share. In April 2018, the Board of Directors increased the number of authorized shares of common stock to 500,000,000 and decreased the number of authorized shares of preferred stock to 10,000,000.

On March 30, 2016,building, we entered into a two year agreement to lease a portion of the building as of the sale date.

94 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows:

Lease Type

 

Balance Sheet Classification

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease assets

 

Trade and other receivables, net

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

5.4

 

Operating lease assets

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

2.2

 

Operating lease assets

 

Right of use lease asset

 

 

29.4

 

 

 

27.9

 

Financing lease assets

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

8.0

 

Total lease assets

 

 

 

$

41.3

 

 

$

43.5

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing lease liabilities

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

1.5

 

 

$

0.4

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

Current portion of long-term lease liabilities

 

 

11.3

 

 

 

10.5

 

Noncurrent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing lease liabilities

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

 

8.1

 

 

 

8.4

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

Long-term lease liabilities, less current portion

 

 

32.7

 

 

 

33.6

 

Total lease liabilities

 

 

 

$

53.6

 

 

$

52.9

 

The components of lease expense were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Lease Cost

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Operating lease cost

 

$

6.1

 

 

$

9.1

 

 

$

12.8

 

Financing lease cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation of lease assets

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

0.1

 

Interest on lease liabilities (a)

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

Sublease income

 

 

(2.2

)

 

 

(4.1

)

 

 

(4.4

)

Net lease cost

 

$

5.5

 

 

$

6.2

 

 

$

8.5

 

(a)
Interest on lease liabilities was less than $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

95 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating cash flows from operating leases

 

$

11.6

 

 

$

1.5

 

Operating cash flows from finance leases

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

0.4

 

Financing cash flows from finance leases

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

3.3

 

Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

4.4

 

The future minimum lease payments under our operating and financing leases were as follows:

Years Ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2022

 

$

17.0

 

2023

 

 

13.6

 

2024

 

 

9.8

 

2025

 

 

7.0

 

2026

 

 

3.8

 

Thereafter

 

 

7.6

 

Total lease payments (a)

 

$

58.8

 

Less: Interest

 

 

5.2

 

Total

 

$

53.6

 

(a)
Future minimum lease payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $0.5 million due in the future under noncancellable subleases.

96 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate were as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

9.0

 

Financing leases

 

 

8.9

 

 

 

10.6

 

Weighted average discount rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

 

4.07

%

 

 

10.18

%

Financing leases

 

 

3.81

%

 

 

3.91

%

16. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

We are subject to claims and a number of judicial and administrative proceedings considered normal in the course of our current and past operations, including employment-related disputes, contract disputes, disputes with our competitors, intellectual property disputes, government audits and proceedings, customer disputes, and tort claims. In some proceedings, the claimant seeks damages as well as other relief, which, if granted, would require substantial expenditures on our part.

Our general terms and conditions in customer contracts frequently include a provision indicating we will indemnify and hold our customers harmless from and against any and all claims alleging that the services and materials furnished by us violate any third party’s patent, trade secret, copyright or other intellectual property right. We are not aware of any material pending litigation concerning these indemnifications.

Some of these matters raise difficult and complex factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties, including the facts and circumstances of each particular action, and the jurisdiction, forum, and law under which each action is proceeding. Because of these complexities, final disposition of some of these proceedings may not occur for several years. As such, we are not always able to estimate the amount of our possible future liabilities, if any.

There can be no certainty that we may not ultimately incur charges in excess of presently established or future financial accruals or insurance coverage. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, it is management’s opinion that the final disposition of these proceedings will not, considering the merits of the claims and available resources or reserves and insurance, and based upon the facts and circumstances currently known, have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

2019 Unrecovered Duplicate Payments

We identified an equity financing transaction with Ceridian Holding II. Ceridian Holding II raised $150.2 from our Sponsors,isolated service incident on September 26, 2019, that resulted in duplicate payments for certain of their co-investors,our U.S. payroll customers totaling $18.8 million. Through December 31, 2019, $11.2 million remained unrecovered, and certain other existing stockholderswe recorded a loss for the amount unrecovered within selling, general, and administrative expense in our consolidated statement of Ceridian Holding. Of such amount, $75.0 was contributed by Ceridian Holding II to Ceridian on March 30, 2016. The remaining $75.2 was committed to be funded to Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. withinoperations for the following three years, and was recorded within equity as a receivable from stockholder. Duringperiod ended December 31, 2019. Our recovery efforts continued through the second quarter of 2017,2020, resulting in collections of $0.4 million during the board of directors of Ceridian Holding II approved the funding of the remaining $75.2,year ended December 31, 2020, which was transferredrecognized as a reduction to Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. on June 28, 2017.

In connection therewith, Ceridian issued $150.2 of the Senior Preferred Stock to Ceridian Holding II. The Senior Preferred Stock was senior in priority to all outstanding equity securities of Ceridianselling, general, and had the rights to be converted to common stock at the option of the stockholder for a number of shares based on the conversion price. The initial conversion price was equal to the original issuance price and was subject to adjustment for certain events of dilution, including common stock dividends, stock splits, mergers and reorganizations, and the initial public offering price upon such event. In the event of an initial public offering, the Senior Preferred Stock would be automatically converted to common stock. The Senior Preferred Stock received a 12.5% annual dividend (not cash paying). In the event of liquidation, the Senior Preferred Stock had a liquidation preference equal to 1.5 times the initial face amount plus any accrued but unpaid dividends. 

The Junior Preferred Stock provided holders with the equivalent number of votes on an “as converted” basis. The Junior Preferred Stock had the rights to be converted to common stock at the option of the holder for a number of shares based on the conversion price. The initial conversion price was equal to the original issuance price adjusted for certain events of dilution other than shares issued to employees and directors pursuant to the 2013 SIP and certain other instances of issuances of shares of common stock. In the event of an initial public offering, the Junior Preferred Stock would be automatically converted to common stock. In the event of liquidation, Junior Preferred Stock received the greater of up to $13.50 per share of preferred stock (adjusted for dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the convertible participating preferred stock) or a pro rata price per share of all common stock if converted in a liquidation event, subject to the total amount of net assets available in liquidation.

On April 30, 2018, we completed our IPO, in which we issued a total of 24,150,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $22.00. Concurrently with our IPO, we issued an additional 4,545,455 shares of our common stock in a private placement at $22.00 per share. Concurrent with the IPO and private placement, all outstanding Junior and Senior Preferred Stock were automatically converted into common shares pursuant to their terms.

administrative expense. As of December 31, 2018, there2020, we no longer pursued collection efforts of the remaining amount unrecovered.

Environmental Matters

We accrue for losses associated with environmental remediation obligations when such losses are probable and reasonably estimable. Accruals for estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than completion of the remedial feasibility study. Such accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value.

In February 1988, our predecessor entered into an arrangement with Northern Engraving Corporation (“NEC”) and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) in relation to groundwater contamination on a parcel of real estate sold by our predecessor to NEC. Ceridian is now responsible for the arrangement with NEC

97 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

and the MPCA. The arrangement requires expense sharing between Ceridian and NEC for the remediation of groundwater contamination.

In September 1989, our predecessor entered into an EMA with Seagate related to groundwater contamination on a parcel of real estate sold by our predecessor to Seagate. Ceridian is now responsible for the EMA. The EMA requires expense sharing between Ceridian and Seagate for the remediation of groundwater contamination up to a certain limit. We have recognized an environmental reserve liability equal to the EMA limit.

We have recognized an undiscounted liability of approximately $4.5 million and $4.8 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheets to comply with the NEC arrangement and EMA described above. The ultimate cost, however, will depend on the extent of continued monitoring activities as these projects progress.

98 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

17. Related Party Transactions

We provide Dayforce and related services to certain companies that are considered related parties. The revenue from these related parties was as follows:

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Counter-Party

 

Related Persons Interest

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

FleetCor Technologies, Inc.

 

Shared board members. One board member is also the chief executive officer and the chairman of the counter-party's board

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

0.9

 

 

$

0.8

 

The Stronach Group

 

The brother of David D. Ossip, our Chair and Co-Chief Executive Officer, was formerly the chief executive officer, and is currently a minority shareholder

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

Verve Senior Living

 

David D. Ossip, our Chair and Co-Chief Executive Officer, and his brother are currently minority shareholders

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

Fidelity National Financial, Inc.

 

Shared board members

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.4

 

Black Knight Sports and Entertainment, LLC

 

Portfolio company of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. ("THL"), of which certain members of our board are managing directors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

Essex Technology Group, LLC

 

Portfolio company of THL, of which certain members of our board are managing directors

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

Guaranteed Rate, Inc.

 

Portfolio company of THL, of which certain members of our board are managing directors

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.8

 

HighTower Advisors, LLC

 

Portfolio company of THL, of which certain members of our board are managing directors. One board member also serves on the board of the counter-party

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

Ten-X, LLC

 

Portfolio company of THL, of which certain members of our board are managing directors

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.4

 

Philips Feed Services

 

Portfolio company of THL, of which certain members of our board are managing directors

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

The Dun and Bradstreet Corporation

 

Shared board members with Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc., which owns the counter-party

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*We have entered into a contract to provide Dayforce and related services to the Dun and Bradstreet Corporation.

99 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

We are party to service agreements with certain companies that are considered related parties. Payments made to related parties were 139,453,710 shares of common stock issuedas follows:

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Counter-Party

 

Related Persons Interest

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

The Dun and Bradstreet Corporation

 

Shared board members with Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc., which owns the counter-party

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

$

 

Manulife Financial

 

Shared board members. Leagh E. Turner, our Co-Chief Executive Officer, also serves as a director

 

 

8.1

 

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

7.1

 

18. Capital Stock and outstanding. Net (Loss) Income per Share

As of December 31, 2017,2021 and 2020, there were 65,285,962151,995,031 and 148,571,412 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, 16,802,144 shares of Senior Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, and 58,244,308 shares of Junior Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.respectively.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to the rights set forth as follows. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes entitled to be cast except as set forth below with respect to directors to be elected by the holders of common stock. Our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights. Except as otherwise provided in our thirdfourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation or as required by law, all matters to be voted on by our stockholders other than matters relating to the elections and removal of directors must be approved by a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter or by a written resolution of the stockholders representing the number of affirmative votes required for such matter at a meeting.

Our stockholders have no preemptive or other rights to subscribe for additional shares. All holders of our common stock are entitled to share equally on a share-for-share basis in any assets available for distribution to common stockholders upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up. All outstanding shares are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.


19. Net Loss per Share

We compute net loss per share of common stock using the treasury stock method.

Basic net loss(loss) income per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to Ceridian(loss) income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

For the calculation of diluted net loss(loss) income per share, net loss(loss) income per share is adjusted by the effect of dilutive securities, including awards under our share-based compensation plans. Diluted net loss(loss) income per share is computed by dividing the resulting net loss attributable to Ceridian available to common stockholders(loss) income by the weighted-average number of fully diluted common shares outstanding. In the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021 and 2016,2020, our potential dilutive shares, such as term-based stock options, RSUs, and shares of senior and junior convertible preferred stockPSUs were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect of including these shares in the calculation would have been anti-dilutive.

The numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net loss(loss) income per share computations arewere calculated as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(75.4

)

 

$

(4.0

)

 

$

78.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic

 

 

150,402,321

 

 

 

146,774,471

 

 

 

142,049,112

 

Effect of dilutive equity instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,707,480

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding - diluted

 

 

150,402,321

 

 

 

146,774,471

 

 

 

148,756,592

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income per share - basic

 

$

(0.50

)

 

$

(0.03

)

 

$

0.55

 

Net (loss) income per share - diluted

 

$

(0.50

)

 

$

(0.03

)

 

$

0.53

 

100 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to Ceridian

 

$

(63.4

)

 

$

(9.2

)

 

$

(92.9

)

Less: (Loss) income from discontinued operations

 

 

(25.8

)

 

 

(6.0

)

 

 

12.5

 

Net loss from continuing operations attributable to Ceridian

 

 

(37.6

)

 

 

(3.2

)

 

 

(105.4

)

Less: Senior Preferred Stock dividends declared

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

20.5

 

 

 

14.1

 

Net loss from continuing operations attributable to Ceridian available

   to common stockholders

 

$

(45.3

)

 

$

(23.7

)

 

$

(119.5

)

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic

 

 

114,049,682

 

 

 

65,204,960

 

 

 

64,988,338

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted

 

 

114,049,682

 

 

 

65,204,960

 

 

 

64,988,338

 

Net loss per share from continuing operations attributable to

   Ceridian—basic and diluted

 

$

(0.40

)

 

$

(0.36

)

 

$

(1.84

)

Net (loss) income per share from discontinued operations—basic and

   diluted

 

$

(0.22

)

 

$

(0.10

)

 

$

0.19

 

Net loss per share attributable to Ceridian—basic and diluted

 

$

(0.62

)

 

$

(0.46

)

 

$

(1.65

)

The following potentially dilutive shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss(loss) income per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Senior convertible preferred stock

 

 

5,523,993

 

 

 

16,802,144

 

 

 

12,601,608

 

Junior convertible preferred stock

 

 

19,148,814

 

 

 

58,244,308

 

 

 

58,244,308

 

Stock options

 

 

14,227,487

 

 

 

10,201,105

 

 

 

8,423,124

 

RSUs

 

 

587,283

 

 

 

451,190

 

 

 

155,692

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Stock options

 

 

5,874,818

 

 

 

7,135,159

 

 

 

3,307,719

 

Restricted stock units

 

 

604,770

 

 

 

745,955

 

 

 

18,980

 

Performance stock units

 

 

549,583

 

 

 

229,433

 

 

 

 

The shares underlying the conversion option in the Convertible Senior Notes were not considered in the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. Based on the initial conversion price, the entire outstanding principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes as of December 31, 2021, would have been convertible into approximately 4.3 million shares of our common stock. Since we expect to settle the principle amount of the Convertible Senior Notes in cash, we use the treasury stock method for calculating any potential dilutive effect on diluted net income per share, if applicable. As a result, only the amount by which the conversion value exceeds the aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes (the “conversion spread”) is considered in the diluted earnings per share computation. The conversion spread has a dilutive impact on diluted net income per share when the average market price of our common stock for a given period exceeds the initial conversion price of $132.20 per share for the Convertible Senior Notes. We excluded the potentially dilutive effect of the conversion spread of the Convertible Senior Notes as the average market price of our common stock during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, was less than the conversion price of the Convertible Senior Notes. In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into Capped Calls, which were not included for purposes of calculating the number of diluted shares outstanding, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With AccountantsAccountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosureDisclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our ChiefCo-Chief Executive OfficerOfficers and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2018.2021. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2018,2021, our ChiefCo-Chief Executive OfficerOfficers and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This Form 10-K does not include a report of management's assessment regardingOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting or(as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Management conducted an attestation reportassessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on the assessment, management has concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Our independent

101 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

registered public accounting firm, dueKPMG LLP, has issued an audit report with respect to our internal control over financial reporting, which appears in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

On March 1, 2021, we completed the acquisition of Ascender. Prior to this acquisition, Ascender was a transition period established byprivately-held company not subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules and regulations of the SEC, or other corporate governance requirements to which public companies may be subject. As of and for newly public companies.the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, Ascender accounted for approximately 5% of our consolidated total assets and 7% of our consolidated total revenue.

As part of our ongoing integration activities, we are in the process of incorporating internal controls over significant processes specific to Ascender that we believe are appropriate and necessary to account for the acquisition and to consolidate and report our financial results. In accordance with guidance issued by the SEC, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their final assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the year of acquisition. Accordingly, we have excluded Ascender from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 as our integration activities are ongoing and incomplete.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There wasWith the exception of internal control-related integration activities related to our acquisition of Ascender, there were no changechanges in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20182021, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our ChiefCo-Chief Executive OfficerOfficers and Chief Financial Officer, believes that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

102 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K



Table of ContentsPART III

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Other than “ExecutiveDirectors

The information provided under the headings “Election of Directors” under Proposal One and “Board of Directors” in the Proxy Statement for Ceridian’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Proxy Statement”), is incorporated herein by reference.

Executive Officers of the Registrant” which

Information regarding our executive officers is set forth at the end ofin Item 1 in Part I of this Form 10-K captioned “Executive Officers”.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

The nature of certain relationships and related party transactions between any director, executive officer or person nominated to become a director is stated under the information required by this item (other than the information set forthheadings “Election of Directors” under Proposal One, “Board of Directors”, and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” in the next paragraph in this Item)Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in Ceridian’s Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meetingreference.

Code of Stockholders under the headings “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance”, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management, Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, and “Additional Information”.Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics known as the “Code of Conduct” that applies to all employees, contractors, officers and directors of Ceridian. The Code of Conduct may be viewed online on Ceridian’s website https://www.ceridian.com/Ceridian/media/Files/ceridian-code-of-conduct-2018.pdf. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Conduct that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. A copy of the Code of Conduct is availableprincipal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer by posting such information on our website located at www.ceridian.com. Any amendments or waivers from our Code of Conduct granted to directors or executive officers will be disclosed on our Internet website promptlywithin four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

Director Nomination Process

The information provided under the headings “Election of Directors” under Proposal One, “Committees of the Board of Directors” under the Board of Directors heading, and “Corporate Governance Guidelines” under the Corporate Governance heading in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board.

Audit Committee; Audit Committee Financial Expert

The information provided under the subheadings “Committees of the Board of Directors” under the Board of Directors heading and “Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors” under Proposal Three in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in Ceridian’s Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the headings “Executive and Director“Director Compensation” and, Executive Compensation”, “Equity Compensation Plan Information”, and “Corporate Governance”.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in Ceridian’sthe Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the heading “Security“Equity Compensation Plan Information”.

103 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”, “Equity Compensation Plan Information”, and “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance”.Management

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in Ceridian’sthe Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the headings “Certainheading “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in Ceridian’sthe Proxy Statement forunder the 2019 Annual Meetingheadings “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions”, “Election of StockholdersDirectors”, under Proposal One, “Board of Directors” and “Corporate Governance”.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Our independent registered public accounting firm is KPMG LLP, Minneapolis, MN, Auditor Firm ID: 185.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Proposal Three, Ratification“Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.Firm for Fiscal Year 2022” under Proposal Three.


104 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of ContentsPART IV

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(1)

Consolidated Financial Statements

(1)
Consolidated Financial Statements

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements at Item 8 herein.

(2)

Financial Statement Schedules

(2)
Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(3)

Exhibits

(3)
Exhibits

The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Exhibit

Number

 

Description

3.1

ThirdFourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 24, 2018)5, 2021).

3.2

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23.1 to the QuarterlyCurrent Report filed on Form 10-Q8-K filed by the Company on May 24, 2018)February 9, 2022).

4.1

Certificate of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 24, 2018).

4.2

Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 30, 2018, by and among Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. and the other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 24, 2018).

10.1    4.3**

Description of the Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

    4.4

Indenture, dated as of March 5, 2021, between Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on March 5, 2021).

    4.5

Form of 0.25% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on March 5, 2021).

  10.1

Credit Agreement, dated April 30, 2018, between Ceridian HCM Holding Inc., as borrowers, the lenders party thereto, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch (as administrative agent and collateral agent) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 9, 2018).

  10.2

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated February 19, 2020, between Ceridian HCM Holding Inc., as borrowers, the lenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch (as administrative agent and collateral agent) and(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 6, 2020).

  10.3

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2021, between Ceridian HCM Holding, Inc., as borrowers, the lenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG Canadian branchNew York Branch (as Canadian subagent)administrative agent and collateral agent) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the QuarterlyCurrent Report filed on Form 10-Q8-K filed by the Company on August 9, 2018)December 16, 2021).

10.2*  10.4

Form of Capped Call Transaction Confirmation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on March 5, 2021).

  10.5*

Employment Agreement, dated April 2, 2012, by and between Ceridian Dayforce Corporation and David D. Ossip (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration on Form S-1 filed by the Company on March 26, 2018).

10.3*  10.6*

Performance-Based Stock Option Award Agreement dated May 8, 2020 by and between Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. and David Ossip (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 5, 2020).

  10.7*

Amended and Restated Restrictive Covenant Agreement, effective as of March 20, 2017, by and among Ceridian Holding LLC, Ceridian LLC, Ceridian Canada Ltd., Ceridian Dayforce Corporation and David D. Ossip (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration on Form S-1 filed by the Company on March 26, 2018).

105 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

10.4*  10.8*

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 7, 2018,effective February 9, 2022, between Leagh E. Turner and Ceridian Canada Ltd. and Leagh E. Turner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.410.1 to the RegistrationCurrent Report on Form S-18-K filed by the Company on NovemberFebruary 9, 2018.)2022).

10.5*  10.9*

Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2016,May 1, 2019, by and between Chris R. Armstrong and Ceridian Canada Ltd. and Paul D. ElliottHCM, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.410.1 to the RegistrationQuarterly Report on Form S-110-Q filed by the Company on March 26, 2018)July 30, 2019).

10.6*  10.10*

Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 14, 2016,November 5, 2019, by and between Christopher R. Armstrong and Ceridian Canada Ltd. and Arthur GitajnHCM, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.510.6 to the RegistrationAnnual Report on Form S-110-K filed by the Company on MarchFebruary 26, 2018)2020).

10.7*  10.11*

Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated Aprileffective February 3, 2012, by2020, between Christopher R. Armstrong and between Ceridian Dayforce Corporation and Ozzie J. GoldschmiedHCM, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.910.1 to the RegistrationCurrent Report on Form S-18-K filed by the Company on March 26, 2018)February 5, 2020).

10.8*  10.12*

Employment Agreement, dated December 7, 2017, by and between Ceridian Canada Ltd. and Scott A. Kitching (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration on Form S-1 filed by the Company on March 26, 2018).

10.9*  10.13*

EmploymentSeparation Agreement, dated January 4, 2018, byRelease, and Consulting Agreement, effective February 16, 2021, between Scott A. Kitching, Ceridian HCM Holding Inc., and Lisa SterlingCeridian Canada Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.810.3 to the RegistrationQuarterly Report on Form S-110-Q filed by the Company on March 26, 2018)May 5, 2021).

10.10*  10.14*

Employment Agreement, dated August 7, 2018,September 15, 2020, by and between Noémie C. Heuland and Ceridian HCM, Inc. and Erik J. Zimmer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1110.2 to the RegistrationQuarterly Report on Form S-110-Q filed by the Company on November 9, 2018)5, 2020).

10.11*10.15*

SeparationEmployment Agreement, effective July 30, 2020, between Joseph B. Korngiebel and Consulting Agreement, dated August 7, 2018, by and between Ceridian HCM, Holding Inc., Ceridian Canada Ltd. and Paul D. Elliott (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1210.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 5, 2021).

10.16*

Employment Agreement, effective February 26, 2021, between Rakesh Subramanian and Ceridian HCM, Inc., (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 5, 2021).

  10.17*

Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective March 15, 2021, between Rakesh Subramanian and Ceridian HCM, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 5, 2021).

  10.18*

Employment Agreement, effective June 7, 2021, between William McDonald and Ceridian HCM, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 4, 2021).

  10.19*

Ceridian Holding Corp. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, dated November 9, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration on Form S-1S-8 filed by the Company on November 9,April 25, 2018).

10.12*  10.20*

2013 Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, dated October 1, 2013, and as amended on March 30, 2016, August 11, 2016, December 30, 2016, and March 20, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registration on Form S-1 filed by the Company on March 26, 2018).

10.13*  10.21*

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement for Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registration on Form S-1 filed by the Company on April 12, 2018).

10.14*  10.22*

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by the Company on April 25, 2018).

10.15*  10.23*

Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registration on Form S-1 filed by the Company on April 12, 2018).

10.16*  10.24*

Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for awards made after May 1, 2019) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on July 30, 2019).

  10.25*

Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for annual compensation awards made after May 1, 2020)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Reported on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 5, 2020).

  10.26*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for Canadian executive awards made after February 25, 2021) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 26, 2021).

  10.27*

Form of Director Stock Option Award Agreement (for annual compensation awards made after May 1, 2020) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Reported on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 5, 2020).

106 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

  10.28*

Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (for Canadian executive awards made after February 25, 2021) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 26, 2021).

  10.29*

Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registration on Form S-1 filed by the Company on April 12, 2018).


10.17*  10.30*

Form of EmployeeOption to Purchase Common Stock Option Award Agreementof Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registration on Form S-1 filed by the Company on April 12, 2018).

10.18  10.31*

VotingForm of Stock Option Award Agreement dated April 30, 2018,(for awards made after February 25, 2021) (incorporated by and among Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. andreference to Exhibit 10.3 to the other parties theretoCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 26, 2021.

  10.32*

Form of Employee Performance-Based Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Reported on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 5, 2020).

  10.33*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 10, 2020).

  10.34*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for awards made after February 25, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 26, 2021).

  10.35*

Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the QuarterlyCurrent Report filed on Form 10-Q by the Company on August 9, 2018).

10.19

Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 16, 2018, by and between Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. and THL / Cannae Investors LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registration on Form S-18-K filed by the Company on April 20, 2018)March 2, 2020).

10.20  10.36*

Form of Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (for awards made after February 25, 2021) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 26, 2021).

  10.37*

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by the Company on November 28, 2018).

21.1  10.38*

Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. 2021 Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 26, 2021).

  21.1**

List of subsidiaries of Ceridian HCM Holding Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Registration on Form S-1 filed by the Company on March 26, 2018).

23.1**

Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

24.1

Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

31.1**

 

Certification of PrincipalCo-Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2**

Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

  31.3**

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1**

 

Certification of PrincipalCo-Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**

Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

  32.3**

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS101.INS**

 

Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

101.SCH101.SCH**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL101.CAL**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF101.DEF**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB101.LAB**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE101.PRE**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104**

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

*

Management compensatory plan or arrangement.

**

Filed herewith.

* Management compensatory plan or arrangement.

** Filed herewith.

107 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

Not applicable.


108 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of ContentsSIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

CERIDIAN HCM HOLDING INC.

 

 

 

 

Date: February 28, 201925, 2022

 

By:

/s/ David D. Ossip

 

 

 

Name: David D. Ossip

 

 

 

Title: ChiefCo-Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 25, 2022

By:

/s/ Leagh E. Turner

Name: Leagh E. Turner

Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned constitutes and appoints each of Arthur Gitajn, Scott A. KitchingNoémie C. Heuland and William E. McDonald, or any of them, each acting alone, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for such person and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming that any such attorney-in-fact and agent, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

109 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name

 

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ David D. Ossip

 

ChairmanChair and ChiefCo-Chief Executive Officer

(PrincipalCo-Principal Executive Officer)

 

February 28, 201925, 2022

David D. Ossip

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Arthur GitajnLeagh E. Turner

Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Co-Principal Executive Officer)

February 25, 2022

Leagh E. Turner

/s/ Noémie C. Heuland

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

February 28, 201925, 2022

Arthur GitajnNoémie C. Heuland

 

 

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey S. Jacobs

Head of Accounting and Financial Reporting (Principal Accounting Officer)

 February 25, 2022

Jeffrey S. Jacobs

/s/ Brent B. Bickett

 

Director

 

February 28, 201925, 2022

Brent B. Bickett

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Ronald F. Clarke

 

Director

 

February 28, 201925, 2022

Ronald F. Clarke

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ William P. Foley, IIDeborah A. Farrington

 

Director

 

February 28, 201925, 2022

William P. Foley, IIDeborah A. Farrington

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Thomas M. Hagerty

 

Director

 

February 28, 201925, 2022

Thomas M. Hagerty

 

 

 

 

/s/ Linda P. Mantia

Director

 February 25, 2022

Linda P. Mantia

/s/ Ganesh B. Rao

 

Director

 

February 28, 201925, 2022

Ganesh B. Rao

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Andrea S. Rosen

 

Director

 

February 28, 201925, 2022

Andrea S. Rosen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Gerald C. Throop

 

Director

 

February 28, 201925, 2022

Gerald C. Throop

 

 

 

 

110 img213354928_1.jpg2021 Form 10-K

117