Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒. No ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐. No ☒.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒. No ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~Registrant~~registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the ~~Registrant~~registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒. No ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company”in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐. No ☒.

The aggregate market value of common shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on December 31, ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$3,520,375,787,~~$6,180,118,785, based upon the closing price of the Registrant’s common shares as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape on such date.

As of August ~~15, 2019,~~3, 2020, there were ~~24,881,546~~25,096,775 shares outstanding of CACI International’s common stock, par value $0.10 per share.

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates by reference certain information from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Regulation 14A for the ~~2019~~2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Certain information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, may not address historical facts and, therefore, could be interpreted to be “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including projections of financial performance; statements of plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statement concerning developments, performance or industry rankings relating to products or services; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing; and any other statements that address activities, events or developments that the Company intends, expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future. Forward-looking statements may be characterized by terminology such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “should,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “estimates,” “projects,” “strategy” and similar expressions. These statements are based on assumptions and assessments made by the Company’s management in light of its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors it believes to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that include but are not limited to the factors set forth under Item 1A, Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ materially from those envisaged by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company disclaims any duty to update such forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the foregoing.

CACI International Inc (CACI), a Delaware corporation, is a holding company whose operations are conducted through subsidiaries that are located in the United States (U.S.) and Europe. CACI was founded in 1962 as a simulation technology company and has grown into ana leading provider of Expertise and Technology to Enterprise and Mission customers, on both a domestic and international ~~information solutions and services provider. CACI serves 12 markets for which we provide domain expertise, solutions and services to meet enterprise and mission needs.~~

~~CACI International Inc was organized in Delaware on October 8, 1985 and is a holding company whose operations are conducted through subsidiaries, which are located in the U.S. and Europe.~~

For the year ended June 30, 2019 (FY2019), we generated $5.0 billion of revenue from our contracts with customers in the U.S. federal government and commercial markets, primarily in North America, as well as in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and the Netherlands. As a result of our diverse capabilities and customer mission understanding, many of our customer relationships have existed for over 20 years.basis.

Our proven ~~solutions~~Expertise and ~~services~~Technology and strong record of program delivery have enabled us to compete for and secure new customers and new contracts, win repeat business, and build and maintain long-term customer relationships. We seek competitive business opportunities and have built our operations to support major programs through a market-focused business development organization.

Our primary customers are agencies and departments of the U.S. government. Our ~~information solutions~~Expertise and ~~services~~Technology support national security missions and government modernization/transformation for intelligence, defense, and federal civilian customers. The demand for our ~~solutions~~Expertise and ~~services,~~Technology, in large measure, is created by the increasingly complex network, systems, and information environments in which governments and businesses operate, and by the need to stay current with emerging technology while increasing productivity, enhancing security, and, ultimately, improving performance.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “we”, “our”, “the Company” and “CACI” as used in Parts I, II and III include CACI International Inc and its subsidiaries and ventures that are majority-owned or otherwise controlled by it. The term “the Registrant” as used in Parts I, II and III refers to CACI International Inc only.

For additional discussion and analysis on recent business developments, see “Business Environment and Industry Trends” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations” in Part II of this annual report on Form 10-K.

~~Our domestic operations account for 100 percent of our U.S. government revenue~~The Company provides Expertise and ~~32.6 percent of our commercial~~Technology to Enterprise and ~~other revenue. Some of the contracts performed by our domestic operations involve assignment of employees to international locations~~Mission customers in support of ~~our federal~~national security missions and government ~~customers. We provide our services and solutions to our domestic customers in the following market areas:~~modernization/transformation.

We provide our Expertise and Technology to our domestic customers in the following market areas:

Our international operations are conducted primarily through our operating subsidiaries in Europe, CACI Limited and CACI BV, and account for substantially all revenue generated from international ~~customers and 67.4 percent of our commercial and other revenue.~~customers. Headquartered in London, our international operations provide a diverse mix of IT services and proprietary data and software products, serving commercial and government customers throughout the U.K., continental Europe and around the world.

We operate in a highly competitive industry that includes many firms, some of which are larger in size and have greater financial resources than we do. We obtain much of our business on the basis of proposals submitted in response to requests from potential and current customers, who may also receive proposals from other firms. Non-traditional players have entered the market and have established positions related to such areas as cloud computing, cyber, satellite operations, and business ~~systems and healthcare IT.~~systems. Additionally, we face indirect competition from certain government agencies that perform services for themselves similar to those marketed by us. We know of no single competitor that is dominant in our fields of technology. We have a relatively small share of the available worldwide market for our solutions and services and intend to achieve growth and increase market share both organically and through strategic acquisitions.

We offer substantially our entire range of solutions and services and proprietary products to defense, intelligence and civilian agencies of the U.S. government. Our work for U.S. government agencies may combine a wide range of skills drawn from our solutions, services and product offerings. We also contract through our international operations to supply solutions, services and/or products to governments of other nations. As with other government contractors, our business is subject to government customer funding decisions and actions that are beyond our control.

Although we are a supplier of proprietary computer-based technology products and marketing systems products, we are not primarily focused on being a software product developer-distributor (see discussion following under “Patents, Trademarks, Trade Secrets and Licenses”).

Our international commercial customer base consists primarily of large enterprises in the U.K. This market is the primary target of our proprietary marketing systems software, and database products and consultancy services. Commercial bids are frequently negotiated as to terms and conditions for schedule, specifications, delivery and payment.

In order to effectively perform on our existing customer contracts and secure new customer contracts within the U.S. government, we must maintain expert knowledge of agency policies, operations and challenges. We combine this comprehensive knowledge with significant expertise in the design, integration, development and implementation of advanced information solutions and ~~services.~~services to Enterprise and Mission customers. This capability provides us with opportunities either to compete directly for, or to support other bidders in competition for multi-million dollar and multi-year award contracts from the U.S. government.

We have strategic business relationships with a number of companies associated with the information technology industry. These strategic partners have business objectives compatible with ours and offer products and services that complement ours. We intend to continue development of these kinds of relationships wherever they support our growth objectives.

Our marketing and new business development is conducted by many of our officers and managers including the Chief Executive Officer, executive officers, vice presidents and division managers. We employ marketing professionals who identify and qualify major contract opportunities, primarily in the federal government market.

Much of our business is won through submission of formal competitive bids. Government and commercial customers typically base their decisions regarding contract awards on their assessment of the quality of past performance, responsiveness to proposal requirements, price, and other factors. The terms, conditions and form of contract of government bids, however, are in most cases specified by the customer. In situations in which the customer-imposed contract type and/or terms appear to expose us to inappropriate risk or do not offer us a sufficient financial return, we may seek alternate arrangements or opt not to bid for the work. Essentially all contracts with the U.S. government, and many contracts with other government entities, permit the government customer to terminate the contract at any time for the convenience of the government or for default by the contractor. Although we operate under the risk that such terminations may occur and have a material impact on operations, such terminations have been rare and, generally, have not materially affected operations.

Our contracts and subcontracts are composed of a wide range of contract types, including firm fixed-price, cost reimbursement, time-and-materials, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) and government wide acquisition contracts (known as GWACS) such as General Services Administration (GSA) schedule contracts. By company policy, significant fixed-price contracts require the approval of at least two of our senior officers.

In ~~FY2019,~~FY2020, the top ten revenue-producing contracts, many of which consist of many task orders, accounted for ~~30.7~~31.1 percent of our revenue, or ~~$1.5~~$1.8 billion.

In the U.S. government’s Fiscal Year (GFY) 2019, discretionary spending is expected to be approximately $1.3 trillion. Based on the analysis of an independent market consultant retained by the Company, we believe that the addressable market for our offerings is approximately $221 billion and is expected to continue to grow over the next several years. Approximately 70 percent of our revenue comes from defense-related customers, including those in the Intelligence Community (IC), with additional revenue coming from non-defense IC, homeland security, and other federal civilian customers. As a result of the two-year Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018), appropriations for the Department of Defense (DoD), including those for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), for GFY 2018 and GFY 2019 increased 10 percent and 2 percent, respectively.

We carefully follow federal budget, legislative and contracting trends and activities and evolve our strategies to take these into consideration. In late July 2019, Congress passed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 (BBA 2019), which increased the caps for defense and non-defense spending for GFY 2020 and GFY 2021, established discretionary spending caps for GFY 2020 and GFY 2021, and suspended the national debt limit through July 2021. On August 2, 2019, the President signed the measure into law. While Congress has yet to determine the final allocations for the 12 appropriation bills for GFY 2020, bipartisan support remains for continued investment in the areas of defense and national security. Specifically, the BBA 2019 calls for defense spending, including OCO funds, of $738 billion in GFY 2020 and $740.5 billion in GFY 2021. Both represent increases from GFY 2019 levels of $716 billion.

Until September 30, 2021, the U.S. Government is operating under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA). This law established limits on discretionary spending, reducing planned defense spending by a minimum of $487 billion over a 10-year period that began at the end of GFY 2012. In addition, the BCA included a sequester mechanism that imposed additional defense cuts of $500 billion, or approximately 9 percent, over nine years starting in GFY 2013 if the Congress did not identify a means to reduce the U.S. deficit by $1.2 trillion. Because these means were not identified, the sequester mechanism took effect in March 2013. Since the beginning of sequestration in March 2013, there have been five laws enacted that have extended the automatic direct spending reductions beyond the GFY 2021, the most recent of which was the BBA 2019. As a result of the BBA 2019, the sequester mechanism instituted by the BCA has been eliminated for the remaining two government fiscal years covered by that law.

During those periods of time when appropriations bills have not been passed and signed into law, government agencies operate under a continuing resolution (CR). During GFY 2019, from December 8 to December 21, 2018, the nine Cabinet departments and dozens of smaller agencies whose appropriations bills were not passed operated under a CR. If by September 30, 2019, Congress does not complete its budget process for GFY 2020, it must pass a CR to keep the government operating beyond that date. Depending on their scope, duration, and other factors, CRs can negatively impact our business due to delays in new program starts, delays in contract award decisions, and other factors. We continuously review our operations in an attempt to identify programs potentially at risk from CRs so that we can consider appropriate contingency plans.

When federal agencies and programs lack either appropriated or interim funding, they must cease operations, or shutdown, except in certain emergency situations or when the law authorizes continued activity. Government shutdowns necessitate furloughs of several hundred thousand federal employees, require cessation or reduction of many government activities, and affect numerous sectors of the economy. From December 22, 2018 to January 25, 2019, the aforementioned nine departments and dozens of smaller agencies were shutdown. On January 25, 2019, the President signed into law a short-term measure that ended the shutdown and funded the government through February 15, 2019. On February 15, 2019, the President signed into law an omnibus appropriations bill that funded for the remainder of GFY 2019 the nine Cabinet departments and dozens of smaller agencies that were affected by the government shutdown. The 35-day government shutdown that ended in January 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations for the twelve months ended June 30, 2019.

Across our addressable market, we strive to address our customers’ most critical needs, supporting both the successful execution of their mission and the efficient operation of their enterprise. During our FY2019, we continued to align the Company’s capabilities with well-funded budget priorities and took steps to maintain a competitive cost structure in line with our expectations of future business opportunities. In light of these actions, as well as the budgetary environment discussed above, we believe we are well positioned to win new business in our large addressable market. We believe that the following trends will influence the USG’s spending in our addressable market:

The demand for faster acquisitions is outpacing traditional methodologies and we believe this will benefit those that can provide agility, speed and innovation to address requirements. USG investments in advanced technologies and innovation ecosystems are likely to accelerate adoption into operational systems.

We believe the USG will continue to seek spending reductions in core enterprise services through improved operational efficiency, technology adoption, automation, and performance-based-contracting. This is balanced by increased investments in modernizing enterprise enabling applications using agile methodologies, development, security and operations (DevSecOps) driven synergies between development and operations, integrated security services, and an increase in adoption of contemporary technology including Cloud, robotic process automation (RPA), data analytics, and transparent automated workflow. We expect to see a steady stream of funding for these types of transformational activities that yield results in a shorter timeframe while providing more stable, secure and predictable information systems.

The increased focus on cyber security, space, and the electromagnetic spectrum is increasing opportunities in the Electronic Warfare marketplace, driving toward modernization and innovation. Counterterrorism, counterintelligence, and counter proliferation also remain at the forefront of U.S. security concerns. The world is increasingly interconnected and interdependent. Instability can arise quickly and spread rapidly beyond borders. This phenomenon is readily apparent in events in the Pacific Rim, the Middle East and North Africa, and can create both opportunities and challenges as the contractor community adapts to the changing needs of Defense, Intelligence, Homeland Security, State, and U.S. partners. As the U.S. military advantage continues to be challenged, the need for intelligence and surveillance of potential adversaries of all types will continue or grow. Funding to support the use of military and intelligence assets, particularly special operating forces, to combat these threats is expected to remain stable or increase. Mission requirements continue to accelerate needs for agility, speed, flexibility and configurability to address the rapidly changing threat profile.

As companies strive to expand and increase market share by acquiring other companies, there is increasing competition for acquisition candidates. Companies providing cyber, electronic warfare, data analytics and advanced technology solutions are in particularly high demand.

~~The USG continues to change the manner in which it purchases goods and services. The aspects of these changes that are most relevant to us are as follows:~~

We believe that our customers' use of lowest price/technically acceptable (LPTA) procurements, which contributed to pricing pressures in prior years, has moderated. We also continue to see protests of major contract awards and delays in USG procurement activities. In addition, many of our federal government contracts require us to employ personnel with security clearances, specific levels of education and specific past work experience. Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain and competition for skilled personnel in the information technology services industry is intense. Additional factors that could affect USG spending in our addressable market include changes in set-asides for small businesses and budgetary priorities limiting or delaying federal government spending in general.

During the past three fiscal years, we completed a total of nine acquisitions, including:

Our business in general is not seasonal, although the summer and holiday seasons affect our revenue because of the impact of holidays and vacations on our labor and on product and service sales by our international operations. Variations in our business also may occur at the expiration of major contracts until such contracts are renewed or new business is obtained.

The U.S. government’s fiscal year ends on September 30 of each year. It is not uncommon for government agencies to award extra tasks or complete other contract actions in the weeks before the end of a fiscal year in order to avoid the loss of unexpended funds. Moreover, in years when the U.S. government does not complete the budget process for the next fiscal year before the end of September, government operations whose appropriations legislation has not been signed into law are funded under a continuing resolution that authorizes them to continue to operate but traditionally does not authorize new spending initiatives.

Our employees are our most valuable resource. We are in continuing competition for highly skilled professionals in virtually all of our business areas. The success and growth of our business is significantly correlated with our ability to recruit, train, promote and retain high quality people at all levels of the organization. For these reasons, we endeavor to maintain competitive salary structures, incentive compensation programs, fringe benefits, opportunities for growth, and individual recognition and award programs. Fringe benefits are generally consistent across our subsidiaries, and include: paid time off for vacations, sick leave, and holidays; medical, dental, disability and life insurance; tuition reimbursement for job-related education and training; and other benefits under various retirement savings and stock purchase plans.

We have published policies that set high standards for the conduct of our business. We require all of our employees, independent contractors working on customer engagements, officers, and directors annually to execute and affirm to the code of ethics applicable to their activities. In addition, we require annual ethics and compliance training for all of our employees to provide them with the knowledge necessary to maintain our high standards of ethics and compliance.

Generally, our solutions and services are not substantially dependent upon obtaining or maintaining intellectual property protections, although our operations make use of such protections and benefit from them as discriminators in competition. The Company owns patents and claims copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights in a variety of intellectual property, including each of our proprietary computer software and data products and the related documentation. We also maintain a number of trade secrets that contribute to our success and competitive distinction and endeavor to accord such trade secrets protection adequate to ensure their continuing availability to us.

Our proprietary information is protected through a combination of contractual arrangements with our employees and third parties and intellectual property laws. From time to time, we are required to assert our rights against former employees or other third parties who attempt to misappropriate our proprietary and confidential information. Although we are not materially dependent on the protection of our intellectual property, we take such matters seriously and pursue claims against such individuals to the extent necessary to adequately protect our rights.

As a systems integrator, it is important that we maintain access to software, data and other products supplied by third parties and we continue to enter into agreements that give us the right to distribute and receive income from third party software, data and other products that serve our customers. The durations of such agreements are negotiated and vary according to the terms of the agreements.

The Company’s backlog represents total value on our existing contracts that has the potential to be recognized into revenue as work is performed. The Company includes unexercised option years in its backlog amount and excludes task orders that may be issued underneath a multiple award IDIQ vehicle until such task orders are awarded.

As of June 30, 2019, the Company had total backlog of $16.9 billion, of which $2.9 billion was funded. The total backlog consists of remaining performance obligations (see Note 11, Revenue Recognition in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) plus unexercised options.

There is no assurance that all funded or potential contract value will result in revenue being recognized. The Company continues to monitor our backlog as it is subject to change from execution of new contracts, contract modifications or extensions, government deobligations, or early terminations. Based on this analysis, an adjustment to the period end balance may be required.

Additional business segment, foreign operations and major customer information is provided in our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report. In particular, see Note ~~17,~~18, Business Segment, Customer and Geographic Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following information is provided on the amounts of our revenue attributable to cost reimbursable, firm fixed-price (including proprietary software product sales) and time-and-materials contracts during each of the last three fiscal years:

Our telephone number is (703) 841-7800 and our website can be accessed at www.caci.com. We make our web site content available for information purposes only. It should not be relied upon for investment purposes, nor is it incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are made available free of charge on our website at www.caci.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Documents filed by us with the SEC can also be viewed at www.sec.gov.

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with the information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file with the SEC. The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we have identified as material but are not the only risks and uncertainties that we face. Our business is also subject to general risks and uncertainties, such as overall U.S. and non-U.S. economic and industry conditions including a global economic slowdown, geopolitical events, changes in laws or accounting rules, fluctuations in interest and exchange rates, terrorism, international conflicts, major health concerns including global pandemics like COVID-19, natural disasters or other disruptions of expected economic and business conditions, that affect many other companies. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may impact our business operations and liquidity.

We generate substantially all of our revenue from contracts with the federal government. If the federal government significantly decreased or ceased doing business with us, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.

The federal government is our primary customer, with revenue from federal government contracts, either as a prime contractor or a subcontractor, accounting for 95.6 percent of our total revenue in FY2020 and 95.3 percent of our total revenue in ~~FY2019 and 94.8~~FY2019. Specifically, we generated 69.9 percent of our total revenue in ~~FY2018. Specifically, we generated~~FY2020 and 70.0 percent of our total revenue in FY2019 ~~and 67.9 percent of our total revenue in FY2018~~ from contracts with agencies of the DoD. We expect that federal government contracts will continue to be the primary source of our revenue for the foreseeable future. If we were suspended or debarred from contracting with the federal government or any significant agency in the intelligence community or the DoD, if our reputation or relationship with government agencies was impaired, or if the government otherwise ceased doing business with us or significantly decreased the amount of business it does with us, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.

Our business could be adversely affected by delays caused by our competitors protesting major contract awards received by us, resulting in the delay of the initiation of work.

The number of bid protests of contract awards by unsuccessful bidders is increasing and the U.S. government is taking longer to resolve such protests. Bid protests may result in an increase in expenses related to obtaining contract awards or an unfavorable modification or loss of an award. In the event a bid protest is unsuccessful, the resulting delay in the startup and funding of the work under these contracts may cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our business could be adversely affected by changes in spending levels or budgetary priorities of the federal government.

Because we derive substantially all of our revenue from contracts with the federal government, we believe that the success and development of our business will continue to depend on our successful participation in federal government contract programs. Changes in federal government budgetary priorities, such as for homeland security or to address global pandemics like COVID-19, or actions taken to address government budget deficits, the national debt, and/or prevailing economic conditions, could directly affect our financial performance. A significant decline in government expenditures, a shift of expenditures away from programs that we support or a change in federal government contracting policies could cause federal government agencies to reduce their purchases under contracts, to exercise their right to terminate contracts at any time without penalty or not to exercise options to renew contracts. ~~Refer~~For further discussion, refer to ~~the “Budgetary Environment” section within “Industry~~“Business Environment and Industry Trends” ~~above for further discussion.~~in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations” in Part II of this annual report on Form 10-K.

At times, we may continue to work without funding, and use our own internal funds in order to meet our customer’s desired delivery dates for products or services. It is uncertain at this time which of our programs’ funding could be reduced in future years or whether new legislation will be passed by Congress in the next fiscal year that could result in additional or alternative funding cuts.

Additionally, our business could be affected if we experience an increase in set-asides for small businesses that could result in our inability to compete directly for prime contracts.

Our federal government contracts may be terminated by the government at any time and may contain other provisions permitting the government not to continue with contract performance, and if lost contracts are not replaced, our operating results may differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We generate substantially all of our revenue from federal government contracts that typically include a base period and discrete option periods. The option periods typically cover more than half of the contract’s potential duration. Federal government agencies generally have the right not to exercise these option periods. In addition, our contracts typically also contain provisions permitting a government customer to terminate the contract for its convenience. A decision not to exercise option periods or to terminate contracts for convenience could result in significant revenue shortfalls from those anticipated.

Federal government contracts contain numerous provisions that are unfavorable to us.

Federal government contracts contain provisions and are subject to laws and regulations that give the government rights and remedies, some of which are not typically found in commercial contracts, including allowing the government to:

If the government terminates a contract for convenience, we may recover only our incurred or committed costs, settlement expenses and profit on work completed prior to the termination. If the government terminates a contract for default, we may be unable to recover even those amounts and instead may be liable for excess costs incurred by the government in procuring undelivered items and services from another source. Depending on the value of a contract, such termination could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. Certain contracts also contain organizational conflict of interest (OCI) clauses that limit our ability to compete for or perform certain other contracts. OCIs arise any time we engage in activities that (i) make us unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the government; (ii) impair or might impair our objectivity in performing contract work; or (iii) provide us with an unfair competitive advantage. For example, when we work on the design of a particular system, we may be precluded from competing for the contract to develop and install that system. Depending upon the value of the matters affected, an OCI issue that precludes our participation in or performance of a program or contract could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

As is common with government contractors, we have experienced and continue to experience occasional performance issues under certain of our contracts. Depending upon the value of the matters affected, a performance problem that impacts our performance of a program or contract could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

If we fail to establish and maintain important relationships with government entities and agencies, our ability to successfully bid for new business may be adversely affected.

To facilitate our ability to prepare bids for new business, we rely in part on establishing and maintaining relationships with officials of various government entities and agencies. These relationships enable us to provide informal input and advice to government entities and agencies prior to the development of a formal bid. We may be unable to successfully maintain our relationships with government entities and agencies, and any failure to do so may adversely affect our ability to bid successfully for new business and could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We derive significant revenue from contracts and task orders awarded through a competitive bidding process. If we are unable to consistently win new awards over any extended period, our business and prospects will be adversely affected.

Our contracts and task orders with the federal government are typically awarded through a competitive bidding process. We expect that much of the business that we will seek in the foreseeable future will continue to be awarded through competitive bidding. Budgetary pressures and changes in the procurement process have caused many government customers to increasingly purchase goods and services through IDIQ contracts, GSA schedule contracts and other government-wide acquisition contracts. These contracts, some of which are awarded to multiple contractors, have increased competition and pricing pressure, requiring that we make sustained post-award efforts to realize revenue under each such contract. In addition, in consideration of the practice of agencies awarding work under such contracts that is arguably outside the intended scope of the contracts, both the GSA and the DoD have initiated programs aimed to ensure that all work fits properly within the scope of the contract under which it is awarded. The net effect of such programs may reduce the number of bidding opportunities available to us. Moreover, even if we are highly qualified to work on a particular new contract, we might not be awarded business because of the federal government’s policy and practice of maintaining a diverse contracting base.

This competitive bidding process presents a number of risks, including the following:

If we are unable to win particular contracts, we may be prevented from providing to customers services that are purchased under those contracts for a number of years. If we are unable to consistently win new contract awards over any extended period, our business and prospects will be adversely affected and that could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. In addition, upon the expiration of a contract, if the customer requires further services of the type provided by the contract, there is frequently a competitive rebidding process. There can be no assurance that we will win any particular bid, or that we will be able to replace business lost upon expiration or completion of a contract, and the termination or non-renewal of any of our significant contracts could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our business may suffer if we or our employees are unable to obtain the security clearances or other qualifications we and they need to perform services for our customers.

Many of our federal government contracts require us to have security clearances and employ personnel with specified levels of education, work experience and security clearances. Depending on the level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain. If we or our employees lose or are unable to obtain necessary security clearances, we may not be able to win new business and our existing customers could terminate their contracts with us or decide not to renew them. To the extent we cannot obtain or maintain the required security clearances for our employees working on a particular contract, we may not generate the revenue anticipated from the contract which could cause our results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We must comply with a variety of laws and regulations, and our failure to comply could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

We must observe laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of federal government contracts which affect how we do business with our customers and may impose added costs on our business. For example, the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the industrial security regulations of the DoD and related laws include provisions that:

Our failure to comply with these or other laws and regulations could result in contract termination, loss of security clearances, suspension or debarment from contracting with the federal government, civil fines and damages and criminal prosecution and penalties, any of which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The federal government may change its procurement or other practices in a manner adverse to us.

The federal government may change its procurement practices, or adopt new contracting rules and regulations, such as those related to cost accounting standards. It could also adopt new contracting methods relating to GSA contracts or other government-wide contracts, adopt new socio-economic requirements, or change the basis upon which it reimburses our compensation and other expenses or otherwise limit such reimbursements. In all such cases, there is uncertainty surrounding the changes and what actual impacts they may have on contractors. These changes could impair our ability to obtain new contracts or win re-competed contracts or adversely affect our future profit margin. Any new contracting methods could be costly or administratively difficult for us to satisfy and, as a result, could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Restrictions on or other changes to the federal government’s use of service contracts may harm our operating results.

We derive a significant amount of revenue from service contracts with the federal government. The government may face restrictions from new legislation, regulations or government union pressures, on the nature and amount of services the government may obtain from private contractors (i.e., insourcing versus outsourcing). Any reduction in the government’s use of private contractors to provide federal services could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our contracts and administrative processes and systems are subject to audits and cost adjustments by the federal government, which could reduce our revenue, disrupt our business, or otherwise adversely affect our ~~results of operations.~~operating results.

Federal government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), routinely audit and investigate government contracts and government contractors’ administrative processes and systems. These agencies review our performance on contracts, pricing practices, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. They also evaluate the adequacy of internal controls over our business systems, including our purchasing, accounting, estimating, earned value management, and government property systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated or assigned to contracts will not be reimbursed, and any such costs already reimbursed must be refunded and certain penalties may be imposed. Moreover, if any of the administrative processes and systems are found not to comply with requirements, we may be subjected to increased government scrutiny and approval that could delay or otherwise adversely affect our ability to compete for or perform contracts or collect our revenue in a timely manner. Therefore, an unfavorable outcome of an audit by the DCAA or another government agency could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. If a government investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of contracts, forfeitures of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with the federal government. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were made against us. Each of these results could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Failure to maintain strong relationships with other contractors could result in a decline in our revenue.

We derive substantial revenue from contracts in which we act as a subcontractor or from teaming arrangements in which we and other contractors bid on particular contracts or programs. As a subcontractor or teammate, we often lack control over fulfillment of a contract, and poor performance on the contract could impact our customer relationship, even when we perform as required. We expect to continue to depend on relationships with other contractors for a portion of our revenue in the foreseeable future. Moreover, our revenue and operating results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated if any prime contractor or teammate chose to offer directly to the customer services of the type that we provide or if they team with other companies to provide those services.

We may not receive the full amounts authorized under the contracts included in our backlog, which could reduce our revenue in future periods below the levels anticipated.

Our total backlog consists of funded and unfunded amounts. Funded backlog represents contract value that has been appropriated by a customer and is expected to be recognized into revenue. Unfunded backlog represents the sum of the unappropriated contract value on executed contracts and unexercised option years that is expected to be recognized into revenue. Our backlog may not result in actual revenue in any particular period, or at all, which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The maximum contract value specified under a government contract or task order awarded to us is not necessarily indicative of the revenue that we will realize under that contract. For example, we generate a substantial portion of our revenue from government contracts in which we are not the sole provider, meaning that the government could turn to other companies to fulfill the contract. We also generate revenue from IDIQ contracts, which do not require the government to purchase a pre-determined amount of goods or services under the contract. Action by the government to obtain support from other contractors or failure of the government to order the quantity of work anticipated could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Without additional Congressional appropriations, some of the contracts included in our backlog will remain unfunded, which could materially and adversely affect our future operating results.

Many of our federal government contracts include multi-year performance periods in which Congress appropriates funds on an annual basis. As a result, a majority of our contracts are only partially funded at any point during their full performance period and unfunded contract work is subject to future appropriations by Congress. As a result of a lack of appropriated funds or efforts to reduce federal government spending, our backlog may not result in revenue or may be delayed. We calculate our unfunded backlog based on the aggregate contract revenue that we have the potential to realize. If our backlog estimate is inaccurate and we fail to realize those amounts as revenue, our future operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Employee misconduct, including security breaches, could result in the loss of customers and our suspension or debarment from contracting with the federal government.

We may be unable to prevent our employees from engaging in misconduct, fraud or other improper activities that could adversely affect our business and reputation. Misconduct could include the failure to comply with federal government procurement regulations, regulations regarding the protection of classified information and legislation regarding the pricing of labor and other costs in government contracts. Many of the systems we develop involve managing and protecting information involved in national security and other sensitive government functions. A security breach in one of these systems could prevent us from having access to such critically sensitive systems. Other examples of employee misconduct could include time card fraud and violations of the Anti-Kickback Act. The precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective, and we could face unknown risks or losses. As a result of employee misconduct, we could face fines and penalties, loss of security clearance and suspension or debarment from contracting with the federal government, which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our failure to attract and retain qualified employees, including our senior management team, could adversely affect our business.

Our continued success depends to a substantial degree on our ability to recruit and retain the technically skilled personnel we need to serve our customers effectively. Our business involves the development of tailored solutions for our customers, a process that relies heavily upon the expertise and services of our employees. Accordingly, our employees are our most valuable resource. Competition for skilled personnel in the information technology services industry is intense, and technology service companies often experience high attrition among their skilled employees. There is a shortage of people capable of filling these positions and they are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future. Recruiting and training these personnel require substantial resources. Our failure to attract and retain technical personnel could increase our costs of performing our contractual obligations, reduce our ability to efficiently satisfy our customers’ needs, limit our ability to win new business and cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

In addition to attracting and retaining qualified technical personnel, we believe that our success will depend on the continued employment of our senior management team and its ability to generate new business and execute projects successfully. Our senior management team is very important to our business because personal reputations and individual business relationships are a critical element of obtaining and maintaining customer engagements in our industry, particularly with agencies performing classified operations. The loss of any of our senior executives could cause us to lose customer relationships or new business opportunities, which could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our markets are highly competitive, and many of the companies we compete against have substantially greater resources.

The markets in which we operate include a large number of participants and are highly competitive. Many of our competitors may compete more effectively than we can because they are larger, better financed and better known companies than we are. In order to stay competitive in our industry, we must also keep pace with changing technologies and customer preferences. If we are unable to differentiate our services from those of our competitors, our revenue may decline. In addition, our competitors have established relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase their ability to address customer needs. As a result, new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and compete more effectively than we can. There is also a significant industry trend towards consolidation, which may result in the emergence of companies which are better able to compete against us. The results of these competitive pressures could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our quarterly revenue and operating results could be volatile due to the unpredictability of the federal government’s budgeting process and policy priorities.

Our quarterly revenue and operating results may fluctuate significantly and unpredictably in the future. In particular, if the federal government does not adopt, or delays adoption of, a budget for each fiscal year beginning on October 1, or fails to pass a continuing resolution, federal agencies may be forced to suspend our contracts and delay the award of new and follow-on contracts and orders due to a lack of funding. Further, the rate at which the federal government procures technology may be negatively affected following changes in presidential administrations and senior government officials. Therefore, period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance.

Our quarterly operating results may not meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which in turn may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

We may lose money or generate less than anticipated profits if we do not accurately estimate the cost of an engagement which is conducted on a fixed-price basis.

We generated 28.5 percent of our total revenue in FY2020 and 29.4 percent of our total revenue in FY2019 ~~and 32.6 percent of our total revenue in FY2018~~ from fixed-price contracts. Fixed-price contracts require us to price our contracts by predicting our expenditures in advance. In addition, some of our engagements obligate us to provide ongoing maintenance and other supporting or ancillary services on a fixed-price basis or with limitations on our ability to increase prices. Many of our engagements are also on a time-and-materials basis. While these types of contracts are generally subject to less uncertainty than fixed-price contracts, to the extent that our actual labor costs are higher than the contract rates, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

When making proposals for engagements on a fixed-price basis, we rely on our estimates of costs and timing for completing the projects. These estimates reflect our best judgment regarding our capability to complete the task efficiently. Any increased or unexpected costs or unanticipated delays in connection with the performance of fixed-price contracts, including delays caused by factors outside of our control, could make these contracts less profitable or unprofitable. From time to time, unexpected costs and unanticipated delays have caused us to incur losses on fixed-price contracts, primarily in connection with state government customers. On rare occasions, these losses have been significant. In the event that we encounter such problems in the future, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our earnings and margins may vary based on the mix of our contracts and programs.

At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, our backlog included cost reimbursable, time-and-materials and fixed-price contracts. Cost reimbursable and time-and-materials contracts generally have lower profit margins than fixed-price contracts. Our earnings and margins may therefore vary materially and adversely depending on the relative mix of contract types, the costs incurred in their performance, the achievement of other performance objectives and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees, particularly under incentive and award fee contracts, is finally determined.

Systems failures may disrupt our business and have an adverse effect on our ~~results of operations.~~operating results.

Any systems failures, including network, software or hardware failures, whether caused by us, a third party service provider, unauthorized intruders and hackers, computer viruses, natural disasters, power shortages or terrorist attacks, could cause loss of data or interruptions or delays in our business or that of our customers. Like other global companies, we have experienced cyber security threats to our data and systems, our company sensitive information, and our information technology infrastructure, including malware and computer virus attacks, unauthorized access, systems failures and temporary disruptions. Prior cyber attacks directed at us have not had a material adverse impact on our business or our financial results, and we believe that our continuing commitment toward threat detection and mitigation processes and procedures will reduce such impact in the future. Due to the evolving nature of these security threats, however, the impact of any future incident cannot be predicted. In addition, the failure or disruption of our mail, communications or utilities could cause us to interrupt or suspend our operations or otherwise harm our business. Our property and business interruption insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur as a result of any system or operational failure or disruption and, as a result, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The systems and networks that we maintain for our customers, although highly redundant in their design, could also fail. If a system or network we maintain were to fail or experience service interruptions, we might experience loss of revenue or face claims for damages or contract termination. Our errors and omissions liability insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all the damages that we might incur and, as a result, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Customer systems failures could damage our reputation and adversely affect our ~~results of operations.~~operating results.

Many of the systems that we develop, integrate, maintain, otherwise support or use involve managing and protecting intelligence, national security, and other sensitive government information. While we have programs designed to protect such information and comply with all relevant privacy and security requirements, the threats that our clients face have grown more frequent and sophisticated. A security breach or system failure in a system that we develop, integrate, maintain or otherwise support could result in a loss of revenue, remediation costs, claims for damages or contract termination and our errors and omissions liability insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all the damages that we might incur. Any such event could also cause serious damage to our reputation and prevent us from having access to or being eligible for further work on such sensitive systems for U.S. government customers.

In addition, in order to provide services to our customers, we often depend upon or use customer systems that are supported by the customer or third parties. Any security breach or system failure in such systems could result in an interruption of our customer’s operations, significant delays under a contract, and a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may have difficulty identifying and executing acquisitions on favorable terms and therefore may grow at slower than anticipated rates.

One of our key growth strategies has been to selectively pursue acquisitions. Through acquisitions, we have expanded our base of federal government customers, increased the range of solutions we offer to our customers and deepened our penetration of existing markets and customers. We may encounter difficulty identifying and executing suitable acquisitions. To the extent that management is involved in identifying acquisition opportunities or integrating new acquisitions into our business, our management may be diverted from operating our core business. Without acquisitions, we may not grow as rapidly as the market expects, which could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated. We may encounter other risks in executing our acquisition strategy, including:

Each of these types of risks could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We may have difficulty integrating the operations of any companies we acquire, which could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The success of our acquisition strategy will depend upon our ability to continue to successfully integrate any businesses we may acquire in the future. The integration of these businesses into our operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties, absorb significant management attention and require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development of our business. These integration difficulties include the integration of personnel with disparate business backgrounds, the transition to new information systems, coordination of geographically dispersed organizations, loss of key employees of acquired companies, and reconciliation of different corporate cultures. For these or other reasons, we may be unable to retain key customers of acquired companies. Moreover, any acquired business may fail to generate the revenue or net income we expected or produce the efficiencies or cost-savings we anticipated. Any of these outcomes could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

If our subcontractors fail to perform their contractual obligations, our performance as a prime contractor and our ability to obtain future business could be materially and adversely impacted and our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our performance of government contracts may involve the issuance of subcontracts to other companies upon which we rely to perform all or a portion of the work we are obligated to deliver to our customers. A failure by one or more of our subcontractors to satisfactorily deliver on a timely basis the agreed-upon supplies, perform the agreed-upon services, or appropriately manage their vendors may materially and adversely impact our ability to perform our obligations as a prime contractor.

A subcontractor’s performance deficiency could result in the government terminating our contract for default. A default termination could expose us to liability for excess costs of reprocurement by the government and have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete for future contracts and task orders. Depending upon the level of problem experienced, such problems with subcontractors could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

The federal government’s appropriation process and other factors may delay the collection of our receivables, and our business may be adversely affected if we cannot collect our receivables in a timely manner.

We depend on the collection of our receivables to generate cash flow, provide working capital, pay debt and continue our business operations. If the federal government, any of our other customers or any prime contractor for whom we are a subcontractor fails to pay or delays the payment of their outstanding invoices for any reason, our business and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. The government may fail to pay outstanding invoices for a number of reasons, including lack of appropriated funds or lack of an approved budget. In addition, the DCAA may revoke our direct billing privileges, which would adversely affect our ability to collect our receivables in a timely manner. Contracting officers have the authority to impose contractual withholdings, which can also adversely affect our ability to collect timely. The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations require DoD contracting officers to impose contractual withholdings at no less than certain minimum levels if a contracting officer determines that one or more of a contractor’s business systems have one or more significant deficiencies. Some prime contractors for whom we are a subcontractor have significantly less financial resources than we do, which may increase the risk that we may not be paid in full or payment may be delayed. If we experience difficulties collecting receivables, it could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We have substantial investments in recorded goodwill as a result of prior acquisitions, and changes in future business conditions could cause these investments to become impaired, requiring substantial write-downs that would reduce our operating income.

Goodwill accounts for ~~$3.3~~$3.4 billion of our recorded total assets. We evaluate the recoverability of recorded goodwill amounts annually or when evidence of potential impairment exists. The annual impairment test is based on several factors requiring judgment. Principally, a decrease in expected reporting unit cash flows or changes in market conditions may indicate potential impairment of recorded goodwill. If there is an impairment, we would be required to write down the recorded amount of goodwill, which would be reflected as a charge against operating income.

Our operations involve several risks and hazards, including potential dangers to our employees and to third parties that are inherent in aspects of our federal business (e.g., counterterrorism training services). If these risks and hazards are not adequately insured, it could adversely affect our operating results.

Our federal business includes the maintenance of global networks and the provision of special operations services (e.g., counterterrorism training) that require us to dispatch employees to various countries around the world. These countries may be experiencing political upheaval or unrest, and in some cases war or terrorism. It is possible that certain of our employees or executives will suffer injury or bodily harm, or be killed or kidnapped in the course of these deployments. We could also encounter unexpected costs for reasons beyond our control in connection with the repatriation of our employees or executives. Any of these types of accidents or other incidents could involve significant potential claims of employees, executives and/or third parties who are injured or killed or who may have wrongful death or similar claims against us.

We maintain insurance policies that mitigate against risk and potential liabilities related to our operations. This insurance is maintained in amounts that we believe are reasonable. However, our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover those claims or liabilities, and we may be forced to bear significant costs from an accident or incident. Substantial claims in excess of our related insurance coverage could cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

Our failure to adequately protect our confidential information and proprietary rights may harm our competitive position.

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to protect our proprietary information. Although our employees are subject to confidentiality obligations, this protection may be inadequate to deter misappropriation of our proprietary information. In addition, we may be unable to detect unauthorized use of our proprietary information in order to take appropriate steps to enforce our rights. If we are unable to prevent third parties from infringing or misappropriating our proprietary information, our competitive position could be harmed and our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.

We face additional risks which could harm our business because we have international operations.

We conduct the majority of our international operations in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. As a percentage of our total revenue, our international operations generated 2.9 percent and 3.1 percent in FY2020 and ~~3.7 percent in~~ FY2019, ~~and FY2018,~~ respectively. Our international operations are subject to risks associated with operating in a foreign country. These risks include fluctuations in the value of the British pound and the Euro, longer payment cycles, changes in foreign tax laws and regulations and unexpected legislative, regulatory, economic or political changes.

Our senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility) imposes certain restrictions on our ability to take certain actions which may have an impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.

The Credit Facility imposes certain operating and financial restrictions on us and requires us to meet certain financial covenants. These restrictions may significantly limit or prohibit us from engaging in certain transactions, including the following:

The failure to comply with any of these covenants would cause a default under the Credit Facility. A default, if not waived, could cause our debt to become immediately due and payable. In such situations, we may not be able to repay our debt or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it, and even if new financing is available, it may not contain terms that are acceptable to us.

The Credit Facility consists of a $1,500.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility) and a $938.4 million term loan facility (the Term Loan). The Revolving Facility has sub-facilities of $100.0 million for same-day swing line loan borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit. At any time and so long as no default has occurred, the Company has the right to increase the Revolving Facility or the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $500.0 million or an amount subject to 3.50 times senior secured leverage, calculated assuming the revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals. At June 30, ~~2019, $785.0~~2020, $569.0 million was outstanding under the ~~revolving credit facility~~Revolving Facility and ~~$891.5~~$844.6 million was outstanding under the ~~term loan.~~Term Loan. In addition, the terms of the Credit Facility allow us to incur additional indebtedness from other sources so long as we satisfy the covenants in the agreement governing the Credit Facility. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the risks related to our ability to service that debt could increase.

Servicing our debt requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial debt.

The Credit Facility matures on June 30, 2024. Principal payments under the term loan are due in quarterly installments. Our business may not generate cash flow from operations sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive.

The Credit Facility provides that certain change in control events will constitute a default.

The effects of health epidemics, pandemics and similar outbreaks may have material adverse effects on our business, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows.

We face various risks related to health epidemics, pandemics and similar outbreaks, including the global outbreak of COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic and the mitigation efforts to control its spread have adversely impacted the U.S. and global economies, leading to disruptions and volatility in global capital markets. While we have taken steps to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our employees and our business, the continued spread of COVID-19 may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows as the result of significant portions of our workforce being unable to work due to illness, quarantines, government actions, facility closures or other restrictions; the inability for us to fully perform on our contracts; delays or limits to the ability of the U.S. Government or other customers to make timely payments; incurrence of increased costs which may not be recoverable; adverse impacts on our access to capital; or other unpredictable events. We continue to monitor the effect of COVID-19 on our business, but we cannot predict the full impact of COVID-19 as the extent of the impact will depend on the duration and spread of the pandemic and the actions taken by federal, state, local and foreign governments to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we leased office space at ~~152~~138 U.S. locations containing an aggregate of approximately 3.6 million square feet located in 25 states and the District of Columbia. In four countries outside the U.S., we leased office space at 1713 locations containing an aggregate of approximately 75,000 square feet. Our leases expire over the next 1110 years, with a majority of our leases expiring within the next five years. We anticipate that most of these leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases. All of our offices are in reasonably modern and well-maintained buildings. The facilities are substantially utilized and adequate for present operations.

We maintain our corporate headquarters in approximately 99,000 square feet of space at 1100 North Glebe Road, Arlington, Virginia. See Note ~~15,~~16, Leases, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our lease commitments.

On June 30, 2008, Plaintiff Al Shimari filed a twenty-count complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. Plaintiff Al Shimari is an Iraqi who claimed that he suffered significant physical injury and emotional distress while held at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. The lawsuit named CACI International Inc, CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and former CACI employee Timothy Dugan as Defendants, along with L-3 Services, Inc. The complaint alleged that the Defendants conspired with U.S. military personnel to engage in illegal treatment of Iraqi detainees. The complaint did not allege any interaction between Plaintiff Al Shimari and any CACI employee. Plaintiff Al Shimari sought, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees. On August 8, 2008, the court granted CACI’s motion to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Thereafter, an amended complaint was filed adding three plaintiffs. On September 12, 2008, Mr. Dugan was dismissed from the case without prejudice. On October 2, 2008, CACI filed a motion to dismiss the case. CACI also moved to stay discovery pending further proceedings. The court granted CACI’s motion to stay discovery. On March 18, 2009, the court granted in part and denied in part CACI’s motion to dismiss. On March 23, 2009, CACI filed a notice of appeal with respect to the March 18, 2009 decision. Plaintiffs filed a motion to strike CACI’s notice of appeal and a motion to lift the stay on discovery. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied both motions. On April 27, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit deferred any ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion and issued a briefing schedule. Plaintiffs filed a notice of cross-appeal, which CACI moved to dismiss. The Court of Appeals dismissed the Plaintiffs’ cross-appeal. On October 26, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in the appeal and took the matter under advisement. On September 21, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and remanded the action with instructions to dismiss the action. On October 5, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a petition for a rehearing en banc, which the Court of Appeals granted. The Court of Appeals also invited the United States to participate in the en banc rehearing of the appeal as amicus curiae. The United States participated in that capacity in the en banc rehearing. On January 27, 2012, the Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, heard oral argument. On May 11, 2012, the Court of Appeals, in an 11-3 decision, held that it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal and dismissed the appeal. The action returned to the district court for further proceedings.

On October 12, 2012, the district court conducted a status conference at which the court asked the parties to prepare and submit a plan for discovery in the action. The parties subsequently filed a joint discovery plan, which the court approved. The Court also lifted the stay of discovery, and reinstated the claims arising under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) that the Court had previously dismissed. On December 26, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint. Defendants moved to dismiss several counts of the Second Amended Complaint. On March 8, 2013, the Court dismissed the conspiracy claims in the Second Amended Complaint, and dismissed CACI International Inc from the action. Subsequently, the Court allowed Plaintiffs to file a Third Amended Complaint for the purpose of repleading the conspiracy claims. On March 28, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint, and on April 15, 2013, Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. moved to dismiss the conspiracy claims in the Third Amended Complaint.

On March 19, 2013, the Court granted a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendants with respect to the statute of limitations applicable to the common law tort claims of three of the four Plaintiffs, and dismissed those claims. Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. also filed a motion for sanctions with respect to the failure of three of the four Plaintiffs to appear for depositions and medical examinations as ordered by the court. On April 12, 2013, the Court denied that motion but entered an order requiring the three Plaintiffs to appear for depositions and medical examinations no later than April 26, 2013 and stating that if the three Plaintiffs did not comply with the order their claims were subject to dismissal. Plaintiffs did not appear for depositions in the United States as of April 26, 2013. Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. then renewed its motion for sanctions, seeking dismissal, for the three Plaintiffs’ violation of the Court order to appear for depositions and medical examinations. Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. also filed a motion to dismiss the ATS claims of all four Plaintiffs for lack of jurisdiction in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s April 17, 2013 decision in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, and a motion to dismiss the common law claims of the single Plaintiff with those claims on various grounds.

On June 26, 2013, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.’s motions with respect to Plaintiffs’ ATS claims and Plaintiffs’ common law claims, and dismissing the Third Amended Complaint without prejudice. The Court also denied all other pending motions, including Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.’s motions for sanctions and to dismiss the conspiracy claims, as moot.

On July 24, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of the district court’s June 26 decision.

On March 18, 2014, a three judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held a hearing on Plaintiffs’ appeal and took the matters under advisement. On June 30, 2014, the three judge panel vacated the district court’s June 26, 2013 Order and remanded Plaintiffs’ claims for further proceeding.

On remand, Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc. moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims based upon the political question doctrine. On June 18, 2015, the Court issued an Order granting Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.’s motion to dismiss, and on June 26, 2015 entered a final judgment in favor of Defendant CACI Premier Technology, Inc.

On July 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of the district court’s June 2015 decision. On October 21, 2016, the Court of Appeals vacated and remanded the District Court’s judgment with instructions for the District Court to make further determinations regarding the political question doctrine. The District Court conducted an initial status conference on December 16, 2016. On June 9, 2017, the District Court dismissed Plaintiff Rashid without prejudice from the action based upon his inability to participate. On July 19, 2017, CACI Premier Technology, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the action on numerous legal grounds. The Court held a hearing on that motion on September 22, 2017, and denied the motion pending issuance of a written decision. On January 17, 2018, CACI filed a third-party complaint naming the United States and John Does 1-60, asserting claims for contribution, indemnification, exoneration and breach of contract in the event that CACI Premier Technology, Inc. is held liable to Plaintiffs, as Plaintiffs are seeking to hold CACI Premier Technology, Inc. liable on a co-conspirator theory and a theory of aiding and abetting. On April 13, 2018, the Court held a hearing on the United States’ motion to dismiss and took the matter under advisement.

On April 13, 2018, the Plaintiffs filed a motion to reinstate Plaintiff Rashid, which CACI opposed. On April 20, 2018, the District Court granted that motion subject to Plaintiff Rashid appearing for a deposition. On May 21, 2018, CACI filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on a recent Supreme Court decision. On June 25, 2018, the District Court denied that motion. On October 25, 2018, the District Court conducted a pre-trial conference at which the District Court addressed remaining discovery matters, the scheduling for dispositive motions that CACI intends to file, and set a date of April 23, 2019 for trial, if needed, to start. On December 20, 2018, CACI filed a motion for summary judgment and a motion to dismiss based on the state secrets privilege. On January 3, 2019, CACI filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On February 15, 2019, the United States filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to CACI’s third-party complaint. On February 27, 2019, the District Court denied CACI’s motion for summary judgment and motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and on the state secrets privilege. On February 28, 2019, CACI filed a motion seeking dismissal on grounds of derivative sovereign immunity.

On March 22, 2019, the District Court denied the United States’ motion to dismiss on grounds of sovereign immunity and CACI’s motion to dismiss on grounds of derivative sovereign immunity. The District Court also granted the United States’ motion for summary judgment with respect to CACI’s third-party complaint. On March 26, 2019, CACI filed a Notice of Appeal of the District Court’s March 22, 2019 decision. On April 2, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an Accelerated Briefing Order for the appeal. On April 3, 2019, the District Court issued an Order cancelling the trial schedule and holding matters in abeyance pending disposition of the appeal. On July 10, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument in Spartanburg, South Carolina on CACI’s appeal. On August 23, 2019, the Court of Appeals issued an unpublished opinion dismissing the appeal. A majority of the panel that heard the appeal held that rulings denying derivative sovereign immunity are not immediately appealable even where they present pure questions of law. The panel also ruled, in the alternative, that even if such a ruling was immediately appealable, review was barred because there remained disputes of material fact with respect to CACI’s derivative sovereign immunity defenses. The Court of Appeals subsequently denied CACI’s request for rehearing en banc. CACI then filed a motion to stay issuance of the mandate pending the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari. On October 11, 2019, the Court of Appeals, by a 2-1 vote, denied the motion to stay issuance of the mandate. CACI then filed an application to stay issuance of the mandate with Chief Justice Roberts in his capacity as Circuit Justice for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. After CACI filed that application, the Court of Appeals issued the mandate on October 21, 2019, returning jurisdiction to the district court. On October 23, Chief Justice Roberts denied the stay application “without prejudice to applicants filing a new application after seeking relief in the district court.” CACI then filed a motion in the district court to stay the action pending filing and ~~took~~disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari. On November 1, 2019, the ~~matter under advisement.~~district court granted CACI’s motion and issued an Order staying the action until further order of the court. On November 15, 2019, CACI filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. On January 27, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an Order inviting the Solicitor General to file a brief in the case expressing the views of the United States.

Abbass, et al v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc. and CACI International Inc, Case No. 1:13CV1186-LMB/JFA (EDVA)

On September 20, 2013, fifty-five Plaintiffs filed a nine-count complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia styled Abbass, et al. v. CACI Premier Technology, Inc., et al. Plaintiffs are Iraqi nationals who assert that their allegations are essentially the same as those of the plaintiffs in Al Shimari. Plaintiffs claim that they suffered significant physical injury and emotional distress while in U.S. custody in Iraq. The lawsuit names CACI International Inc and CACI Premier Technology, Inc. as Defendants. The complaint alleges that Defendants conspired with U.S. military personnel to engage in illegal treatment of Iraqi detainees. The complaint does not allege any interaction between Plaintiffs and any CACI employee. Plaintiffs’ claims are brought pursuant to the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victims Protection Act. Plaintiffs seek, inter alia, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.

Plaintiffs’ action was originally filed in 2009 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, but was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice in September 2011 after the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Saleh v. Titan Corp. and Ibrahim v. Titan Corp., 580 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

The CACI Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint. Before deciding the motion to dismiss, the district court stayed the action pending a decision from the Court of Appeals in Al Shimari v. L-3 Services, Inc.

We are vigorously defending the above-described legal proceedings, and based on our present knowledge of the facts, believe the lawsuits are completely without merit.

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “CACI”.

The ranges of high and low sales prices of our common stock quoted on the New York Stock Exchange for each quarter during the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 were as follows:

	2019				2018				2020				2019
Quarter	High		Low		High		Low		High		Low		High		Low
1^st	$	200.85	$	166.80	$	142.85	$	118.10	$	235.00	$	195.17	$	200.85	$	166.80
2^nd	$	188.00	$	138.39	$	147.31	$	121.60	$	252.69	$	215.00	$	188.00	$	138.39
3^rd	$	187.07	$	139.21	$	159.40	$	133.00	$	288.59	$	156.15	$	187.07	$	139.21
4^th	$	212.85	$	180.38	$	174.80	$	147.15	$	266.31	$	199.56	$	212.85	$	180.38

We have never paid a cash dividend. Our present policy is to retain earnings to provide funds for the operation and expansion of our business. We do not intend to pay any cash dividends at this time. The Board of Directors will determine whether to pay dividends in the future based on conditions existing at that time, including our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, as well as economic and other conditions as the board may deem relevant.

As of ~~August 15, 2019,~~July 31, 2020, the number of stockholders of record of our common stock was approximately ~~212.~~202. The number of stockholders of record is not representative of the number of beneficial stockholders due to the fact that many shares are held by depositories, brokers, or nominees.

The following table provides certain information with respect to our purchases of shares of CACI International Inc’s common stock during the three months ended June 30, ~~2019:~~2020:

The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders on CACI International Inc’s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the Russell 1000 index and the Dow Jones U.S. Computer Services Total Stock Market index. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and tracks it through June 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

$100 invested on 6/30/1415 in stock or index—including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending June 30.

	June 30,												June 30,
	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		2020
CACI International Inc	$	100.00	$	115.21	$	128.77	$	178.11	$	240.07	$	291.40	$	100.00	$	111.77	$	154.59	$	208.37	$	252.92	$	268.12
Russell 1000	$	100.00	$	107.37	$	110.52	$	130.44	$	149.41	$	164.38	$	100.00	$	102.93	$	121.49	$	139.16	$	153.10	$	164.55
Dow Jones U.S. Computer Services Total Stock Market	$	100.00	$	101.45	$	100.87	$	114.95	$	125.41	$	135.93	$	100.00	$	99.43	$	113.31	$	123.62	$	133.99	$	129.81

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

The selected financial data included below is from our audited financial statements for each of the fiscal years in the five years ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. This information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and the Notes thereto, included in Part II in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

	Years Ended June 30,										Years Ended June 30,
	2019		2018 (1)		2017		2016		2015		2020		2019		2018 (1)		2017		2016
	(amounts in thousands, except per share data)										(amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Revenue	$	4,986,341	$	4,467,860	$	4,354,617	$	3,744,053	$	3,313,452	$	5,720,042	$	4,986,341	$	4,467,860	$	4,354,617	$	3,744,053
Costs of revenue		4,608,474		4,127,160		4,057,356		3,479,303		3,077,071		5,262,346		4,608,474		4,127,160		4,057,356		3,479,303
Net income		265,604		301,171		163,671		142,799		126,195		321,480		265,604		301,171		163,671		142,799
Earnings per common share and common share equivalent:
Basic:
Weighted-average shares outstanding		24,833		24,616		24,401		24,262		23,948		25,031		24,833		24,616		24,401		24,262
Earnings per share	$	10.70	$	12.23	$	6.71	$	5.89	$	5.27	$	12.84	$	10.70	$	12.23	$	6.71	$	5.89
Diluted:
Weighted-average shares and equivalent shares outstanding		25,395		25,255		25,069		24,802		24,388		25,485		25,395		25,255		25,069		24,802
Earnings per share	$	10.46	$	11.93	$	6.53	$	5.76	$	5.17	$	12.61	$	10.46	$	11.93	$	6.53	$	5.76

	As of June 30,										As of June 30,
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015		2020		2019		2018		2017		2016
	(amounts in thousands)										(amounts in thousands)
Total assets	$	5,086,843	$	4,034,206	$	3,911,082	$	3,987,341	$	3,242,030	$	5,542,472	$	5,086,843	$	4,034,206	$	3,911,082	$	3,987,341
Long-term obligations		2,023,655		1,187,458		1,317,297		1,566,394		1,161,840		2,112,003		2,023,655		1,187,458		1,317,297		1,566,394
Working capital		339,798		392,210		353,158		356,662		266,429		316,727		339,798		392,210		353,158		356,662
Shareholders’ equity		2,371,466		2,106,887		1,793,721		1,607,313		1,480,272		2,661,310		2,371,466		2,106,887		1,793,721		1,607,313

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is provided to enhance the understanding of, and should be read together with, our consolidated financial statements and the Notes to those statements that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Unless otherwise specifically noted, all years refer to our fiscal year which ends on June 30.

We are a leading provider of Expertise and Technology to Enterprise and Mission customers, supporting national security missions and government modernization/transformation in the intelligence, defense, and federal civilian sectors. The demand for our Expertise and Technology, in large measure, is created by the increasingly complex network, systems, and information ~~solutions~~environments in which governments and ~~services~~businesses operate, and by the need to stay current with emerging technology while increasing productivity, enhancing security, and, ultimately, improving performance.

We carefully follow federal budget, legislative and contracting trends and activities and evolve our strategies to take these into consideration. In late July 2019, Congress passed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 (BBA 2019), which increased the caps for defense and non-defense spending for government fiscal year (GFY) 2020 and GFY 2021, established discretionary spending caps for GFY 2020 and GFY 2021, and suspended the national debt limit through July 2021. On August 2, 2019, the President signed the measure into law. BBA 2019 called for defense spending, including Overseas Contingency Operations funds, of $738 billion in GFY 2020 and $740.5 billion in GFY 2021. Both represent increases from GFY 2019 levels of $716 billion. In December 2019, Congress passed two GFY 2020 appropriations bills totaling $1.4 trillion: $738 billion for defense and $632 billion for non-defense agencies, which represent increases over GFY 2019 of $22 billion and $27 billion, respectively. On December 20, 2019, the President signed both bills into law. We believe that bipartisan support remains for continued investment in the areas of defense and national security.

While we view the budget environment as stable under BBA 2019 and believe there is bipartisan support for continued investment in the areas of defense and national security, it is uncertain whether GFY 2021 appropriations bills will be passed in regular order and signed by the President before the end of GFY 2020, particularly given the additional time required to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. During those periods of time when appropriations bills have not been passed and signed into law, government agencies operate under a continuing resolution (CR). Depending on their scope, duration, and other factors, CRs can negatively impact our business due to delays in new program starts, delays in contract award decisions, and other factors. When a CR expires, unless appropriations bills have been passed by Congress and signed by the President, or a new CR is passed and signed into law, the government must cease operations, or shutdown, except in certain emergency situations or when the law authorizes continued activity. We continuously review our operations in an attempt to identify programs potentially at risk from CRs so that we can consider appropriate contingency plans.

As travel restrictions, social distancing advisories, and other requirements began to be implemented in March, we instructed our workforce to begin to work remotely to the ~~U.S. government.~~extent possible. While a majority of our workforce is able to work remotely, some employees must still travel to client or company facilities in order to work. While CACI employees were deemed part of the ‘critical infrastructure workforce’, ensuring their ability to work despite state travel limitations, our business still experienced some impacts as a result of COVID-19 risk mitigation efforts. For example, in order to reduce personnel concentration and ensure social distancing in classified environments, shift work was implemented, which reduced the ~~year ended June 30, 2019, 95.3~~number of hours our employees could work and we could bill customers on certain programs. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which was passed by Congress and signed by the President on March 27, 2020, provides a mechanism to reimburse government contractors for the cost of employees who are ready and able to work but unable to access required facilities due to COVID-19. We continue to work with our customers to implement the related provisions of the CARES Act, as well as support our customers’ return-to-work plans.

Across our addressable market, we provide Expertise and Technology to government Enterprise and Mission customers. Based on the analysis of an independent market consultant retained by the Company, we believe that the total addressable market for our offerings is approximately $230 billion. Our addressable market is expected to continue to grow over the next several years. Approximately 70 percent of our revenue ~~was generated~~comes from ~~contracts~~defense-related customers, including those in the Intelligence Community (IC), with additional revenue coming from non-defense IC, homeland security, and other federal civilian customers.

We continue to align the Company’s capabilities with well-funded budget priorities and took steps to maintain a competitive cost structure in line with our expectations of future business opportunities. In light of these actions, as well as the budgetary environment discussed above, we believe we are well positioned to win new business in our large addressable market. We believe that the following trends will influence the U.S. ~~government, including 70.0 percent from DoD customers and 25.3 percent from U.S. federal civilian agency customers.~~Government (USG) spending in our addressable market:

We believe that our customers’ use of lowest price/technically acceptable (LPTA) procurements, which contributed to pricing pressures in prior years, has moderated, though price still remains an important factor in procurements. We also ~~provide services~~continue to ~~commercial customers~~see protests of major contract awards and ~~foreign government agencies.~~

~~For the year ended June 30, 2019, 92.0 percent~~delays in USG procurement activities. In addition, many of our ~~revenue was from~~federal government contracts ~~where we were~~require us to employ personnel with security clearances, specific levels of education and specific past work experience. Depending on the ~~lead,~~level of clearance, security clearances can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain and competition for skilled personnel in the information technology services industry is intense. Additional factors that could affect USG spending in our addressable market include changes in set-asides for small businesses, changes in budget priorities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and budgetary priorities limiting or “prime,” contractor. We have a diverse mix of contract revenue types, with 55.4 percent cost reimbursable, 29.4 percent fixed-price, and 15.2 percent time-and-materials for the year ended June 30, 2019. delaying federal government spending in general.

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in those financial statements and accompanying notes. We consider the accounting policies and estimates addressed below to be the most important to our financial position and results of operations, either because of the significance of the financial statement item or because they require the exercise of significant judgment and/or use of significant estimates. Although we believe that the estimates are reasonable based on reasonably available facts, due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making those estimates, actual results reported in future periods may differ.

We believe the following accounting policies require significant judgment due to the complex nature of the underlying transactions:

The Company generates almost all of our revenue from three different types of contractual arrangements with the U.S. government: cost-plus-fee, fixed-price, and time-and-materials (T&M)~~, and fixed-price~~ contracts. Our contracts with the U.S. government are generally subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and are competitively priced based on estimated costs of providing the contractual goods or services.

We account for a contract when the parties have approved the contract and are committed to perform on it, the rights of each party and the payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance, and it is probable that we will collect substantially all of the consideration.

At contract inception, the Company determines whether the goods or services to be provided are to be accounted for as a single performance obligation or as multiple performance obligations. This evaluation requires professional judgment as it may impact the timing and pattern of revenue recognition. If multiple performance obligations are identified, we generally use the cost plus a margin approach to determine the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation.

When determining the total transaction price, the Company identifies both fixed and variable consideration elements within the contract. Variable consideration includes any amount within the transaction price that is not fixed, such as: award or incentive fees; performance penalties; unfunded contract value; or other similar items. For our contracts with award or incentive fees, the Company estimates the total amount of award or incentive fee expected to be recognized into revenue. Throughout the performance period, we recognize as revenue a constrained amount of variable consideration only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of the cumulative amount recognized to date will not be required in a subsequent period. Our estimate of variable consideration is periodically adjusted based on significant changes in relevant facts and circumstances. In the period in which we can calculate the final amount of award or incentive fee earned - based on the receipt of the customer’s final performance score or determining that more objective, contractually-defined criteria have been fully satisfied - the Company will adjust our cumulative revenue recognized to date on the contract. This adjustment to revenue will be disclosed as the amount of revenue recognized in the current period for a previously satisfied performance obligation.

We generally recognize revenue over time throughout the performance period as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided on our services-type revenue arrangements. This continuous transfer of control for our U.S. government contracts is supported by the unilateral right of our customer to terminate the contract for a variety of reasons without having to provide justification for its decision. For our services-type revenue arrangements in which there are a repetitive amount of services that are substantially the same from one month to the next, the Company applies the series guidance. We use a variety of input and output methods that approximate the progress towards complete satisfaction of the performance obligation, including: costs incurred, labor hours expended, and time-elapsed measures for our fixed-price stand ready obligations. For certain contracts, primarily our cost-plus and T&M services-type revenue arrangements, we apply the right-to-invoice practical expedient in which revenue is recognized in direct proportion to our present right to consideration for progress towards the complete satisfaction of the performance obligation.

When a performance obligation has a significant degree of interrelation or interdependence between one month’s deliverables and the next, when there is an award or incentive fee, or when there is a significant degree of customization or modification, the Company generally records revenue using a percentage of completion methodology. For these revenue arrangements, substantially all revenue is recognized over time using a cost-to-cost input method based on the ratio of costs incurred to date to total estimated costs at completion. When estimates of total costs to be incurred on a contract exceed total revenue, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is recorded in the period in which the loss is determined.

Contract modifications are reviewed to determine whether they should be accounted for as part of the original performance obligation or as a separate contract. When a contract modification changes the scope or price and the additional performance obligations are at their standalone selling price, the original contract is terminated and the Company accounts for the change prospectively when the new goods or services to be transferred are distinct from those already provided. When the contract modification includes goods or services that are not distinct from those already provided, the Company records a cumulative adjustment to revenue based on a remeasurement of progress towards the complete satisfaction of the not yet fully delivered performance obligation.

Based on the critical nature of our contractual performance obligations, the Company may proceed with work based on customer direction prior to the completion and signing of formal contract documents. The Company has a formal review process for approving any such work that considers previous experiences with the customer, communications with the customer regarding funding status, and our knowledge of available funding for the contract or program.

The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were preliminarily determined using income, market and cost valuation methodologies. ~~The fair value measurements were estimated using significant inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820.~~ The income approach was primarily used to value the customer relationships intangible assets. The income approach indicates value for an asset or liability based on the present value of cash flow projected to be generated over the remaining economic life of the asset or liability being measured. Both the amount and the duration of the cash flows are considered from a market participant perspective. Our estimates of market participant net cash flows considered historical and projected pricing, operational performance including company specific synergies, material and labor pricing, and other relevant customer, contractual and market factors. Where appropriate, the net cash flows are adjusted to reflect the uncertainties associated with the underlying assumptions, as well as the risk profile of the net cash flows utilized in the valuation. The adjusted future cash flows are then discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate. Projected cash flow is discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flow and the time value of money. The fair values of the tangible assets and acquired liabilities assumed, were determined using a combination of market and cost valuation methodologies. The market approach is a valuation technique that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, liabilities, or a group of assets and liabilities. Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach often use market multiples derived from a set of comparables. The cost approach, which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility.

We evaluate goodwill at least annually for impairment, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The evaluation includes comparing the fair value of the relevant reporting unit to the carrying value, including goodwill, of such unit. The level at which we test goodwill for impairment requires us to determine whether the operations below our operating segments constitute a self-sustaining business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment loss is recognized. However, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit may be impaired. Impairment is measured by comparing the derived fair value of the goodwill to its carrying value. Separately identifiable intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment if impairment indicators are present.

We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using both an income approach and a market approach. The valuation process considers our estimates of the future operating performance of each reporting unit. Companies in similar industries are researched and analyzed and we consider the domestic and international economic and financial market conditions, both in general and specific to the industry in which we operate, prevailing as of the valuation date. The income approach utilizes discounted cash flows.

We evaluate goodwill as of the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter. In addition, we will perform interim impairment testing should circumstances requiring it arise. We completed our annual goodwill assessment as of April 1, ~~2019~~2020 and no impairment charge was necessary as a result of this assessment. We have concluded that none of our reporting units are at risk of a goodwill impairment in the near term as their fair values are considerably greater than their carrying values.

Determining the fair values of the reporting units inherently involves management judgments regarding assumptions such as future sales, profits and cash flows, determination of the discount rate, weighting of the income and market approaches, and the effect of the market conditions on those assumptions. Due to the variables inherent in the estimation of a reporting unit’s fair value and the relative size of our goodwill, differences in assumptions could have a material effect on one or more of our reporting units and could result in a goodwill impairment charge in a future period.

See Note 3, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

The following table sets forth the relative percentage that certain items of expense and earnings bear to revenue for the three most recent fiscal years ended.

																	Year to Year Change																												Year to Year Change
	2019		2018			2017		2019			2018			2017			2018 to 2019						2017 to 2018						2020		2019		2018			2020			2019			2018			2019 to 2020					2018 to 2019
	Dollars							Percentages									Dollars			Percent			Dollars			Percent			Dollars							Percentages									Dollars		Percent			Dollars			Percent
	(dollar amounts in thousands)																												(dollar amounts in thousands)
Revenue	$	4,986,341	$	4,467,860		$	4,354,617		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	518,481			11.6	%	$	113,243			2.6	%	$	5,720,042	$	4,986,341	$	4,467,860			100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	733,701		14.7	%	$	518,481			11.6	%
Costs of revenue
Direct costs		3,304,053		2,978,608			2,934,804		66.3			66.7			67.4			325,445			10.9			43,804			1.5			3,719,056		3,304,053		2,978,608			65.0			66.3			66.7			415,003		12.6			325,445			10.9
Indirect costs and selling expenses		1,218,544		1,076,356			1,050,792		24.4			24.1			24.1			142,188			13.2			25,564			2.4			1,432,602		1,218,544		1,076,356			25.1			24.4			24.1			214,058		17.6			142,188			13.2
Depreciation and amortization		85,877		72,196			71,760		1.7			1.6			1.7			13,681			18.9			436			0.6			110,688		85,877		72,196			1.9			1.7			1.6			24,811		28.9			13,681			18.9
Total costs of revenue		4,608,474		4,127,160			4,057,356		92.4			92.4			93.2			481,314			11.7			69,804			1.7			5,262,346		4,608,474		4,127,160			92.0			92.4			92.4			653,872		14.2			481,314			11.7
Income from operations		377,867		340,700			297,261		7.6			7.6			6.8			37,167			10.9			43,439			14.6			457,696		377,867		340,700			8.0			7.6			7.6			79,829		21.1			37,167			10.9
Interest expense and other, net		49,958		42,036			48,642		1.0			0.9			1.1			7,922			18.8			(6,606	)		(13.6	)		56,059		49,958		42,036			1.0			1.0			0.9			6,101		12.2			7,922			18.8
Income before income taxes		327,909		298,664			248,619		6.6			6.7			5.7			29,245			9.8			50,045			20.1			401,637		327,909		298,664			7.0			6.6			6.7			73,728		22.5			29,245			9.8
Income tax (benefit) expense		62,305		(2,507	)		84,948		1.3			-			1.9			64,812			2,585.2			(87,455	)		(103.0	)		80,157		62,305		(2,507	)		1.4			1.3			-			17,852		28.7			64,812			2,585.2
Net income	$	265,604	$	301,171		$	163,671		5.3	%		6.7	%		3.8	%	$	(35,567	)	(11.8)%			$	137,500			84.0	%	$	321,480	$	265,604	$	301,171			5.6	%		5.3	%		6.7	%	$	55,876		21.0		$	(35,567	)	(11.8)%

. For the twelve months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, total revenue was $5.7 billion, 14.7 percent greater than last year with 8.0 percent from organic revenue growth. The remaining growth in revenue was attributable to acquired revenues. Out of our primary customer groups, Department of Defense and Federal Civilian revenue increased by ~~$518.5~~$509.4 million ~~or 11.6 percent,~~and $204.1 million, respectively, compared with the same period a year ago. This increase was attributable to both acquired revenues and organic growth. Acquired revenues accounted for $394.1 million and $23.8 million for FY2019 and FY2018, respectively. See Note 4, Acquisitions, for further discussion of the FY2019 acquisitions. The organic growth is primarily related to contracts performed for DoD customers.ago.

The following table summarizes revenue by customer type with related percentages of revenue for the three most recent fiscal years:

	Years Ended June 30,												Years Ended June 30,
	2019				2018				2017				2020				2019				2018
	(dollar amounts in thousands)												(dollars in thousands)
Department of Defense	$	3,489,854	70.0	%	$	3,032,744	67.9	%	$	2,881,162	66.2	%	$	3,999,261	69.9	%	$	3,489,854	70.0	%	$	3,032,744	67.9	%
Federal civilian agencies		1,263,681	25.3			1,202,023	26.9			1,259,348	28.9
Federal Civilian Agencies														1,467,801	25.7			1,263,681	25.3			1,202,023	26.9
Commercial and other		232,806	4.7			233,093	5.2			214,107	4.9			252,980	4.4			232,806	4.7			233,093	5.2
Total	$	4,986,341	100.0	%	$	4,467,860	100.0	%	$	4,354,617	100.0	%	$	5,720,042	100.0	%	$	4,986,341	100.0	%	$	4,467,860	100.0	%

Direct Costs. For the twelve months ended June 30, ~~2019, DoD revenue~~2020, direct costs increased ~~$457.1~~by $415.0 million or 15.1 percent in FY2019, compared with the same period a year ago. Acquired revenues under DoD contracts accounted for $326.2 million and $4.0 million for FY2019 and FY2018, respectively. DoD revenue includes services provided to the U.S. Army, our single largest customer, where our services focus on supporting readiness, tactical military intelligence, and communications systems. DoD revenue includes work with the U.S. Navy and other DoD agencies across all of our major service offerings.

~~For the twelve months ended June 30, 2019, federal civilian agencies revenue increased $61.7 million or 5.1~~12.6 percent, compared with the same period a year ago. ~~Acquired revenues under federal civilian agency contracts accounted for $58.8 million~~The increase in ~~FY2019 and were immaterial in FY2018.~~ ~~Federal civilian agency revenue includes services provided to non-DoD national intelligence agencies.~~

Commercial and other revenue decreased $0.3 million or (0.1) percent in FY2019, compared with the same period a year ago. Commercial and other revenue is generated from both domestic and international operations. Of the total commercial and other revenue, domestic operations accounted for $75.9 million or 32.6 percent in FY2019, compared with $69.8 million or 30.0 percent in FY2018. International operations accounted for $156.9 million or 67.4 percent in FY2019, compared with $163.3 million or 70.0 percent in FY2018.

~~For the twelve months ended June 30, 2019,~~ direct costs is primarily related to increased ~~by $325.4 million, compared with the same period a year ago.~~direct labor expenses due to organic growth on existing programs and acquired contracts. As a percentage of revenue, total direct costs were ~~66.3~~65.0 percent and ~~66.7~~66.3 percent, respectively, for ~~FY2019~~FY2020 and ~~FY2018. Direct costs include direct labor~~FY2019.

Indirect Costs and other direct costs (ODCs), which include subcontracted labor, material purchases, and other related expenses. Direct labor was the single largest component of direct costs, and was $1.5 billion and $1.3 billion in FY2019 and FY2018, respectively. ODCs are typically incurred in response to specific customer tasks and may vary from period to period. ODCs were $1.8 billion and $1.7 billion in FY2019 and FY2018, respectively.

Selling Expenses. For the twelve months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, indirect costs and selling expenses increased by ~~$142.2~~$214.1 million or 17.6 percent, compared with the same period a year ago. As a percentage of revenue indirect costs and selling expenses were 25.1 percent and 24.4 percent for FY2020 and ~~24.1 percent for~~ FY2019, respectively. This percentage increase is driven primarily by a larger workforce from recent acquisitions, resulting in increased labor, fringe benefit and ~~FY2018, respectively. Indirect costs~~facility costs. The increase also relates to higher investment in independent research and ~~selling expenses include fringe benefits (attributable to both direct and indirect labor), facilities, marketing~~development (IR&D) efforts and bid and proposal (B&P) costs ~~indirect labor~~.

Depreciation and ~~other discretionary expenses. Indirect expenses increased primarily from transaction costs related to~~Amortization. For the ~~Company’s acquisitions, increased independent research and development (IR&D) efforts, increased B&P costs and additional fringe benefits for our large workforce.~~

~~Depreciation~~twelve months ended June 30, 2020, depreciation and amortization expense increased ~~$13.7~~by $24.8 million or ~~18.9~~28.9 percent, ~~in FY2019,~~ compared with the same period a year ago. This increase was primarily attributable to intangible amortization from acquisitions and increased depreciation from ~~the Company’s~~ higher ~~average~~ property and ~~equipment.~~equipment balances.

Interest Expense and Other, Net. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2020, interest expense and other, net increased ~~$7.9~~by $6.1 million or ~~18.8~~12.2 percent, ~~in FY2019,~~ compared with the same period a year ago. The increase is primarily attributable to higher average outstanding debt balances on the Company’s Credit Facility in support of acquisitions. In addition, the Company incurred purchase discount fees on its MARPA ~~Facility~~ (as discussed and defined within Note ~~13)~~14).

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense. The effective income tax rate in FY2020, FY2019, and FY2018, ~~and FY2017,~~ was 20.0 percent, 19.0 percent, ~~(0.8) percent,~~ and ~~34.2~~(0.8) percent, respectively. The effective income tax rate ~~for FY2019 is higher~~increased in FY2020 primarily as a result of pretax book income increasing more than ~~FY2018 primarily due to the Tax Cuts~~favorable credits and ~~Jobs Act (TCJA), specifically the favorable impact of the one-time remeasurement of deferred taxes in FY2018.~~permanent items. In each period, the effective ~~tax~~income rate was favorably affected by excess tax benefits from employee ~~share-based~~stock-based payment awards ~~under ASU 2016-09,~~as well as a benefit from the research and development tax ~~credit,~~credit.

For the twelve months ended June 30, 2020, the Company estimates that COVID-19 has negatively impacted our financial results by approximately $68.0 million of revenue and ~~gains~~$17.9 million of net income. The financial impact was primarily driven by CACI employees and subcontractors who were unable to access certain facilities due to COVID-19 and who could not telework.

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had total backlog of $21.6 billion, compared with $16.9 billion a year ago, an increase of 27.8 percent. Contract awards in FY2020 were $11.6 billion, an increase of 12.8 percent compared with the same period a year ago. Funded backlog as of June 30, 2020 was $2.8 billion. The total backlog consists of remaining performance obligations (see Note 11, Revenue Recognition, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) plus unexercised options.

As discussed further within Item 1A, Risk Factors in ~~value~~this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our earnings and margins may vary based on the mix of ~~assets invested in corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies.~~our contract types. We generated the following revenue on our cost-plus-fee, fixed-price, and time-and-materials contracts during each of the last three fiscal years:

During ~~FY2019, 55.4~~FY2020, 57.2 percent of our revenue was generated under cost-reimbursable contracts which automatically adjust revenue to cover costs that are affected by inflation. ~~15.2~~14.3 percent of our revenue was generated under T&M contracts, where labor rates for many of the services provided are often fixed for several years. Under certain T&M contracts containing IDIQ procurement arrangements, we adjust labor rates annually as permitted. The remaining portion of our business is fixed-price and may span multiple years. We generally have been able to price our T&M and fixed-price contracts in a manner that accommodates the rates of inflation experienced in recent years.

To date, COVID-19 has not had a significant impact on our liquidity, cash flows or capital resources. However, the continued spread of COVID-19 has led to disruption and volatility in the global capital markets, which, depending on future developments, could impact our capital resources and liquidity in the future.

Existing cash and cash equivalents and cash generated by operations are our primary sources of liquidity, as well as sales of receivables under our MARPA ~~Facility~~ (as defined and discussed in Note ~~13)~~14) and available borrowings under our Credit Facility (as defined in Note ~~14)~~15) described below.

The Company has a $2,438.4 million Credit Facility, which consists of an $1,500.0 million Revolving Facility and a $938.4 million Term Loan. The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings and has subfacilities of $100.0 million for same-day swing line borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit. As of June 30, ~~2019, $891.5~~2020, $844.6 million was outstanding under the Term Loan, ~~$785.0~~$569.0 million was outstanding under the Revolving Facility and no borrowings on the swing line.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $11.7 million until the balance is due in full on June 30, 2024.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at our option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin based upon our consolidated total leverage ratio.

The Credit Facility requires us to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting our ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility. Since the inception of the Credit Facility, we have been in compliance with all of the financial covenants. A majority of our assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

Cash and cash equivalents were ~~$72.0~~$107.2 million and ~~$66.2~~$72.0 million as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ respectively. ~~Our~~

Cash provided by operating ~~cash flow~~activities was $518.7 million and $555.3 million for FY2020 and FY2019, ~~which includes $192.5~~respectively. The year-over-year decrease in operating cash flows is primarily related toa $185.1 milliondecrease in cash received from MARPA sales, partially offset by increases of $55.9 million in FY2020 net income, $70.7 million due to more favorable timing of cash ~~provided by sales~~collections, and $40.6 million related to deferrals of employer related social security taxes under the CARES Act. The year-over-year change in MARPA ~~Facility, compared with $321.5 million for~~proceeds is due to initial proceeds received from sold receivablesin the ~~same period ended FY2018.~~prior year. Days-sales outstanding (DSO) was 5448 and 6054 at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The decrease in DSO is primarily related to ~~sales of receivables under our MARPA Facility and~~ timing of cash collections.

Cash used in investing activities was $178.5 million and $1.1 billion during FY2020 and ~~$114.6 million during~~ FY2019, ~~and FY2018,~~ respectively. During ~~FY2019~~FY2020 we paid ~~$1.08 billion~~$106.2 million for business acquisitions, as compared to ~~$76.9 million~~$1.08 billion during ~~FY2018.~~FY2019. Purchases of office and computer ~~related~~ equipment and software of $72.3 million and $47.9 million in FY2020 and ~~$41.6 million in~~ FY2019, ~~and FY2018,~~ respectively, accounted for a majority of the remaining funds used in investing activities.

Cash used in financing activities was $303.4 million during FY2020 compared to cash flows provided by financing activities ~~was~~of $579.6 million during ~~FY2019 compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $206.5 million during FY2018.~~FY2019. During ~~FY2019,~~FY2020, we had net ~~borrowings~~repayment of ~~$599.9~~$262.9 million under our Credit Facility compared to net ~~repayments~~borrowings of ~~$173.4~~$599.9 million in ~~FY2018.~~FY2019. During ~~FY2019~~FY2020 and ~~FY2018,~~FY2019, we paid ~~$0.6~~$8.7 million and ~~$11.6~~$0.6 million, respectively, in settlement of contingent consideration for various acquisitions. During ~~FY2019~~FY2020 and ~~FY2018~~FY2019 we also paid taxes on the settlement of ~~employees~~employee equity transactions of ~~$19.6~~$31.4 million and ~~$21.4~~$19.6 million, respectively.

We believe that the combination of internally generated funds, available bank borrowings, and cash and cash equivalents on hand will provide the required liquidity and capital resources necessary to fund on-going operations, customary capital expenditures, debt service obligations, and other working capital requirements over the next twelve months. We may in the future seek to borrow additional amounts under a long-term debt security. Over the longer term, our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations necessary to fulfill the obligations under the Credit Facility and any other indebtedness we may incur will depend on our future financial performance which will be affected by many factors outside of our control, including current worldwide economic conditions and financial market conditions.

We use off-balance sheet arrangements related to the lease of all of our current office and warehouse facilities. Operating leases are also used to finance the use of computers, servers, phone systems, and to a lesser extent, other fixed assets, such as furnishings, that are obtained in connection with business acquisitions. We generally assume the lease rights and obligations of companies acquired in business combinations and continue leasing equipment under operating leases until the end of the lease term following the acquisition date. We generally do not finance capital expenditures with operating leases, but instead finance such purchases with available cash balances. For additional information regarding our operating lease commitments, see Note 15 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Credit Facility provides for stand-by letters of credit aggregating up to $25.0 million that reduce the funds available under the Revolving Facility when issued. We have no ~~other~~ material off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

We had contractual commitments to repay debt, make payments under operating leases, and settle tax and other liabilities. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 that require us to make future cash payments:

	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1 to 3 years		3 to 5 years		More than 5 years		Total		Less than 1 year		1 to 3 years		3 to 5 years		More than 5 years
	(amounts in thousands)										(amounts in thousands)
Contractual obligations (1):
Bank credit facility-term loan (2)	$	891,475	$	46,920	$	93,840	$	750,715	$	—	$	844,555	$	46,920	$	93,840	$	703,795	$	—
Bank credit facility-revolver loan (2)		785,000		—		—		785,000		—		569,000		—		—		569,000		—
Interest payments (3)		139,470		29,728		56,966		52,776		—		85,719		25,538		43,946		16,235		—
Operating leases (4)		447,552		81,027		135,986		97,747		132,792		417,869		78,302		130,768		102,732		106,067
Deferred consideration (5)		7,045		535		6,510		—		—		7,956		7,216		740		—		—
Other long-term liabilities
Deferred compensation (6)		98,978		6,687		10,166		5,902		76,223		110,654		7,650		9,772		5,395		87,837
Transition tax (7)		5,071		600		1,199		2,623		649		5,071		—		1,699		3,372		—
Deferred payroll taxes (8)												40,594		—		40,594		—		—
Total	$	2,374,591	$	165,497	$	304,667	$	1,694,763	$	209,664	$	2,081,418	$	165,626	$	321,359	$	1,400,529	$	193,904

The interest rates on both the Term Loan and the Revolving Facility are affected by changes in market interest rates. We have the ability to manage these fluctuations in part through interest rate hedging alternatives in the form of interest rate swaps. We have entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of ~~$900.0~~$800.00 million related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness. All remaining balances under our Term Loan, and any additional amounts that may be borrowed under our Revolving Facility, are currently subject to interest rate fluctuations. With every one percent fluctuation in the applicable interest rate, interest expense on our variable rate debt for the twelve months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 would have fluctuated by approximately ~~$7.6~~$7.3 million.

Approximately ~~3.1~~2.9 percent and ~~3.7~~3.1 percent of our total revenue in ~~FY2019~~FY2020 and ~~FY2018,~~FY2019, respectively, was generated from our international operations headquartered in the U.K. Our practice in our international operations is to negotiate contracts in the same currency in which the predominant expenses are incurred, thereby mitigating the exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. To the extent that it is not possible to do so, there is some risk that profits will be affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we held a combination of euros and pounds sterling in the U.K. and in the Netherlands equivalent to approximately ~~$34.1~~$50.5 million. Although these balances are generally available to fund ordinary business operations without legal or other restrictions, a significant portion is not immediately available to fund U.S. operations unless repatriated. Our intention is to reinvest earnings from our foreign subsidiaries. This allows us to better utilize our cash resources on behalf of our foreign subsidiaries, thereby mitigating foreign currency conversion risks.

The Consolidated Financial Statements of CACI International Inc and subsidiaries are provided in Part IV in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with ~~Accountants~~Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic filings with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The effectiveness of a system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of internal controls, and fraud. Due to such inherent limitations, there can be only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that any system of disclosure controls and procedures will be successful in detecting or preventing all errors or fraud, or in making all material information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of management.

We performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision of the CEO and CFO, as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. Based on the evaluation procedures, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

The management of CACI is responsible for establishing, maintaining, and assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f).

We maintain internal controls over financial reporting that are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting, and the preparation of financial statements. CACI’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that 1) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; 2) ensure the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; 3) ensure that our receipts, expenditures and asset dispositions are made in accordance with director and management authorizations; and 4) provide reasonable assurance that our assets are properly safeguarded.

With the participation of our CEO and CFO, we performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to comply with the rules on internal control over financial reporting issued pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In making this evaluation, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on the evaluation procedures, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

On January 29, 2019, CACI acquired all of the equity interests of Mastodon Design LLC (Mastodon). On March 1, 2019, CACI acquired all of the equity interests of Legos Intermediate Holdings, LLC and MDCP Legos Blocker, Inc., the parent companies of LGS Innovations (LGS). As permitted by the SEC, management has excluded Mastodon and LGS from our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting due to the timing of the acquisitions in relation to our fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. Total assets and revenue from the acquired companies represent approximately 21.9 percent and 3.1 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended June 30, 2019.

Management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the independent auditors’ report on internal control over financial reporting, are included in Part IV of this report.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, an evaluation was also performed of any changes in our internal control procedures over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter. Based on this evaluation, management determined there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The Information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of Form 10-K has been omitted in reliance on General Instruction G(3) and is incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as set forth below:

Except for the specific disclosures below, the information required by this Item 10 is included under the headings “Executive Officers” and “Corporate Governance” in our ~~2019~~2020 Proxy Statement for the annual meeting to be held with respect to the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2019 (2019~~2020 (2020 Proxy Statement) and is incorporated by reference.

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions. That code, our Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct, is posted in the “Investors Relations/Corporate Governance” section of our website at www.caci.com and a printed copy of such code will be furnished free of charge to any shareholder who requests a copy.

We intend to disclose any amendment to the Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, and any waiver from a provision of the Standards of Ethics and Business Conduct granted to any director, principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or any other executive officer of the Company, in the “Investors” section of our website at www.caci.com within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

We have adopted a set of corporate governance guidelines in accordance with the requirements of Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual. Those guidelines can be found posted on our website at www.caci.com and a printed copy will be furnished free of charge to any shareholder who requests a copy.

The information required by this Item 11 will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for the ~~2019~~2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year.

The information required by this Item 12 will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for the ~~2019~~2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year.

The information required by this Item 13 will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for the ~~2019~~2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year.

The information required by this Item 14 will be incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for the ~~2019~~2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year.

The financial statements are included under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

All schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in the financial statements included under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or the notes thereto, or because it is not required.

Exhibit No.

Description

Filed

with this

Form 10-K

Incorporated by Reference

Description

Filed

with this

Form 10-K

Incorporated by Reference

Form

Filing Date

Exhibit No.

Form

Filing Date

Exhibit No.

2.1

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2015, by and among CACI International Inc, CACI, Inc.-Federal and L-3 Communications Corporation.

��

8-K

December 8, 2015

2.1

Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 25, 2019, by and among Legos Holdings, LLC, Legos Intermediate Holdings, LLC, CoVant Technologies II LLC - Series LGS, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners VI-C, L.P. MDCP Legos Blocker, Inc. CACI, Inc. – Federal and Legos Holdings, LLC in its capacity as the initial seller representative.

8-K

January 30, 2019

2.1

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation of CACI International Inc, as amended to date.

10-K

September 13, 2006

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation of CACI International Inc, as amended to date.

10-K

September 13, 2006

3.1

3.2

Amended and Restated By-laws of CACI International Inc, amended as of March 16, 2017.

8-K

March 21, 2017

3.1

Amended and Restated By-laws of CACI International Inc, amended as of March 16, 2017.

8-K

March 21, 2017

3.1

4.1

Description of the Corporation’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act of 1934

10.1

The 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CACI International Inc, as amended. *

Def 14A

October 3, 2013

Appendix A

Credit Agreement by and among CACI International Inc as borrower; Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent; and each of the lenders named therein.

8-K

October 27, 2010

10.1

10.2

Amended and Restated Management Stock Purchase Plan of CACI International Inc. *

10-K

August 27, 2008

10.5

Amendment dated May 17, 2011 to the Credit Agreement dated October 21, 2010, between CACI International Inc, Bank of America, N.A. and a consortium of participating banks.

8-K

May 19, 2011

10.2

10.3

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2007 between J.P. London and CACI International Inc. *

10-K

August 29, 2007

10.21

Amendment dated November 18, 2011 to the Credit Agreement dated October 21, 2010, between CACI International Inc, Bank of America, N.A. and a consortium of participating banks.

8-K

November 22, 2011

10.3

10.4

Severance Compensation Agreement dated
October 1, 2007 between Thomas A. Mutryn and CACI International Inc. *

S-1/A

October 9, 2007

10.25

Lender Joinder and Increase Agreement dated as of October 26, 2012 between CACI International Inc, Bank of America, N.A. and a consortium of participating banks.

8-K

October 31, 2012

10.4

10.5

Severance Compensation Agreement dated
June 16, 2008 between Gregory R. Bradford and CACI International Inc. *

10-K

August 27, 2008

10.23

Amendment dated August 6, 2013 to the Credit Agreement dated October 21, 2010, between CACI International Inc, Bank of America, N.A. and a consortium of participating banks.

8-K

August 12, 2013

10.4

10.6

CACI International Inc 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. *

Def 14A

October 6, 2011

Appendix A

10.7

CACI International Inc 2016 Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan. *

Def 14A

October 6, 2016

Appendix A

10.8

Amendment to the CACI International Inc Management Stock Purchase Plan dated
June 23, 2010. *

10-K

August 25, 2010

10.34

10.9

8-K

October 27, 2010

10.1

The management of CACI International Inc is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Management maintains a comprehensive system of internal controls intended to ensure that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization, that assets are safeguarded, and that financial records are reliable. CACI International Inc’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to Company management and its Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Due to inherent limitations, internal control systems can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation, and may not prevent or detect financial statement misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of internal control effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that existing controls may become inadequate because of changing conditions, or that the degree of compliance with existing policies and procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of CACI International Inc’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that CACI International Inc’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, ~~2019.~~

The Company’s management has excluded Mastodon Design LLC (Mastodon) and LGS Innovations (LGS) from its assessment of its internal controls over financial reporting due to the timing of the acquisitions in relation to our fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. Total assets and revenue from the acquired companies represent approximately 21.9 percent and 3.1 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended June 30, 2019.2020.

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein and has reported on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CACI International Inc (the Company) as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for leases in the year ended June 30, 2020.

The critical audit ~~matters~~matter communicated below ~~are matters~~is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial ~~statement~~statements that ~~were~~was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) ~~related~~relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit ~~matters~~matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit ~~matters~~matter below, providing a separate ~~opinions~~opinion on the critical audit ~~matters~~matter or on the ~~accounts~~account or disclosures to which ~~they relate.~~it relates.

As described in Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed the acquisitions of LGS Innovations (LGS) and Mastodon Design LLC (Mastodon) during the year ended June 30, 2019. The Company’s accounting for the acquisitions included determining the fair value of the intangible assets acquired, which primarily included technology and customer relationships.

Auditing the Company's accounting for the acquired intangible assets of LGS and Mastodon involved subjective auditor judgment due to the significant estimation required in management’s determination of the fair value of intangible assets. The significant estimation was primarily due to the sensitivity of the respective fair values to underlying assumptions including discount rates, projected revenue growth rates and profit margins. These assumptions relate to the future performance of the acquired businesses, are forward-looking and could be affected by future economic and market conditions.

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s process for accounting for acquired intangible assets. For example, we tested controls over management’s review of the valuation of intangible assets, including the review of the valuation model and significant assumptions used in the valuation.

To test the fair value of these acquired intangible assets, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the Company's use of valuation methodologies, evaluating the prospective financial information and testing the completeness and accuracy of underlying data. We involved our valuation specialists to assist in testing the significant assumptions used to value the acquired intangible assets. For example, we compared the significant assumptions to current industry, market and economic trends, historical results of the acquired businesses and to other relevant factors. We also performed sensitivity analyses of the significant assumptions to evaluate the change in the fair value resulting from changes in the assumptions.

We have audited CACI International Inc’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, CACI International Inc (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, based on the COSO criteria.

As indicated in the Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the acquired entities LGS Innovations and Mastodon Design Inc, which are included in the 2019 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted 21.9 percent of total assets as of June 30, 2019 and 3.1 percent of revenues for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of LGS Innovations or Mastodon Design Inc.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the ~~2019~~ consolidated financial statements of the Company as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes and our report dated August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

	Fiscal Year Ended June 30,							Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
	2019		2018			2017		2020		2019		2018
Revenue	$	4,986,341	$	4,467,860		$	4,354,617	$	5,720,042	$	4,986,341	$	4,467,860
Costs of revenue:
Direct costs		3,304,053		2,978,608			2,934,804		3,719,056		3,304,053		2,978,608
Indirect costs and selling expenses		1,218,544		1,076,356			1,050,792		1,432,602		1,218,544		1,076,356
Depreciation and amortization		85,877		72,196			71,760		110,688		85,877		72,196
Total costs of revenue		4,608,474		4,127,160			4,057,356		5,262,346		4,608,474		4,127,160
Income from operations		377,867		340,700			297,261		457,696		377,867		340,700
Interest expense and other, net		49,958		42,036			48,642		56,059		49,958		42,036
Income before income taxes		327,909		298,664			248,619		401,637		327,909		298,664
Income tax (benefit) expense		62,305		(2,507	)		84,948
Income tax expense (benefit)									80,157		62,305		(2,507	)
Net income	$	265,604	$	301,171		$	163,671	$	321,480	$	265,604	$	301,171
Basic earnings per share	$	10.70	$	12.23		$	6.71	$	12.84	$	10.70	$	12.23
Diluted earnings per share	$	10.46	$	11.93		$	6.53	$	12.61	$	10.46	$	11.93
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding		24,833		24,616			24,401		25,031		24,833		24,616
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding		25,395		25,255			25,069		25,485		25,395		25,255

	Fiscal Year Ended June 30,									Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			2017			2020			2019			2018
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	265,604		$	301,171		$	163,671		$	321,480		$	265,604		$	301,171
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		85,877			72,196			71,760			110,688			85,877			72,196
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,406			4,061			4,484			2,346			2,406			4,061
Non-cash lease expense											73,248			—			—
Loss on extinguishment of debt		363			104			—			—			363			104
Loss on disposal of assets		70			989			1,025			190			70			989
Stock-based compensation expense		25,272			23,628			21,945			29,302			25,272			23,628
Deferred income taxes		(1,009	)		(77,324	)		15,148			17,874			(1,009	)		(77,324	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures		—			—			(167	)
Gain on sale of assets		—			—			(1,545	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of business acquisitions:
Accounts receivable, net		96,754			(42,575	)		46,158			34,550			96,754			(42,575	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(5,372	)		(9,146	)		(5,221	)		(38,432	)		(5,372	)		(9,146	)
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses		70,692			1,097			(46,825	)		(24,406	)		70,692			1,097
Accrued compensation and benefits		8,387			13,544			12,048			46,769			8,387			13,544
Income taxes payable and receivable		1,119			6,090			(9,954	)		(25,118	)		1,119			6,090
Deferred rent		(538	)		(183	)		(952	)		—			(538	)		(183	)
Operating lease liabilities											(74,928	)		—			—
Long-term liabilities		5,672			27,808			9,675			45,142			5,672			27,808
Net cash provided by operating activities		555,297			321,460			281,250			518,705			555,297			321,460
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(47,902	)		(41,594	)		(43,268	)		(72,303	)		(47,902	)		(41,594	)
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(1,082,809	)		(76,910	)		(7,276	)		(106,226	)		(1,082,809	)		(76,910	)
Proceeds from net working capital and other refunds of acquired business		—			—			19,287
Proceeds from equity method investments		—			—			4,681
Other		2,729			3,898			1,772			—			2,729			3,898
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,127,982	)		(114,606	)		(24,804	)		(178,529	)		(1,127,982	)		(114,606	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from borrowings under bank credit facilities		2,531,500			477,000			485,500			1,698,000			2,531,500			477,000
Principal payments made under bank credit facilities		(1,928,420	)		(647,474	)		(714,465	)		(1,960,920	)		(1,928,420	)		(647,474	)
Payment of financing costs under bank credit facilities		(3,177	)		(2,915	)		—			—			(3,177	)		(2,915	)
Payment of contingent consideration		(616	)		(11,553	)		—			(8,700	)		(616	)		(11,553	)
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plans		5,702			4,929			4,316			7,432			5,702			4,929
Repurchases of common stock		(5,838	)		(5,138	)		(4,386	)		(7,806	)		(5,838	)		(5,138	)
Payment of taxes for equity transactions		(19,595	)		(21,365	)		(10,951	)		(31,400	)		(19,595	)		(21,365	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		579,556			(206,516	)		(239,986	)		(303,394	)		579,556			(206,516	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(1,037	)		317			(3	)		(1,574	)		(1,037	)		317
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		5,834			655			16,457			35,208			5,834			655
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		66,194			65,539			49,082			72,028			66,194			65,539
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	72,028		$	66,194		$	65,539		$	107,236		$	72,028		$	66,194
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of refunds	$	68,303		$	57,941		$	79,268		$	79,071		$	68,303		$	57,941
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	44,673		$	40,100		$	45,015		$	50,986		$	44,673		$	40,100
Non-cash financing and investing activities:
Accrued capital expenditures		8,223			609			667			1,078			8,223			609
Landlord sponsored tenant incentives	$	5,180		$	—		$	—		$	2,925		$	5,180		$	—

	Common Stock												Treasury Stock														Common Stock												Treasury Stock
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Shares			Amount			Total CACI Shareholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interest		Total Shareholders’ Equity			Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Shares			Amount			Total CACI Shareholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interest		Total Shareholders’ Equity
BALANCE, June 30, 2016		41,758	$	4,176	$	558,324		$	1,661,948	$	(41,083	)		17,435		$	(576,187	)	$	1,607,178		$	135	$	1,607,313
Net income		—		—		—			163,671		—			—			—			163,671			—		163,671
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		21,945			—		—			—			—			21,945			—		21,945
Tax withholdings on restricted share vesting		138		14		(10,957	)		—		—			—			—			(10,943	)		—		(10,943	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net		—		—		—			—		14,587			—			—			14,587			—		14,587
Currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			—		(2,804	)		—			—			(2,804	)		—		(2,804	)
Repurchases of common stock		—		—		(236	)		—		—			41			(4,150	)		(4,386	)		—		(4,386	)
Treasury stock issued under stock purchase plans		—		—		4			—		—			(41	)		4,150			4,154			—		4,154
Post-retirement benefit costs		—		—		—			—		184			—			—			184			—		184
BALANCE, June 30, 2017		41,896		4,190		569,080			1,825,619		(29,116	)		17,435			(576,187	)		1,793,586			135		1,793,721			41,896	$	4,190	$	569,080		$	1,825,619	$	(29,116	)		17,435		$	(576,187	)	$	1,793,586		$	135	$	1,793,721
Net income		—		—		—			301,171		—			—			—			301,171			—		301,171			—		—		—			301,171		—			—			—			301,171			—		301,171
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		23,628			—		—			—			—			23,628			—		23,628			—		—		23,628			—		—			—			—			23,628			—		23,628
Tax withholdings on restricted share vesting		243		24		(21,368	)		—		—			—			—			(21,344	)		—		(21,344	)
Tax withholdings on restricted share vestings																												243		24		(21,368	)		—		—			—			—			(21,344	)		—		(21,344	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net		—		—		—			—		7,473			—			—			7,473			—		7,473			—		—		—			—		7,473			—			—			7,473			—		7,473
Currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			—		1,986			—			—			1,986			—		1,986			—		—		—			—		1,986			—			—			1,986			—		1,986
Repurchases of common stock		—		—		(383	)		—		—			36			(4,755	)		(5,138	)		—		(5,138	)		—		—		(383	)		—		—			36			(4,755	)		(5,138	)		—		(5,138	)
Treasury stock issued under stock purchase plans		—		—		7			—		—			(37	)		4,756			4,763			—		4,763			—		—		7			—		—			(37	)		4,756			4,763			—		4,763
Post-retirement benefit costs		—		—		—			—		627			—			—			627			—		627			—		—		—			—		627			—			—			627			—		627
BALANCE, June 30, 2018		42,139	$	4,214	$	570,964		$	2,126,790	$	(19,030	)		17,434		$	(576,186	)	$	2,106,752		$	135	$	2,106,887			42,139	$	4,214	$	570,964		$	2,126,790	$	(19,030	)		17,434		$	(576,186	)	$	2,106,752		$	135	$	2,106,887
Net income		—		—		—			265,604		—			—			—			265,604			—		265,604			—		—		—			265,604		—			—			—			265,604			—		265,604
Cumulative effect adjustment of ASC 606, net of taxes		—		—		—			17,770		—			—			—			17,770			—		17,770			—		—		—			17,770		—			—			—			17,770			—		17,770
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		25,272			—		—			—			—			25,272			—		25,272			—		—		25,272			—		—			—			—			25,272			—		25,272
Tax withholdings on restricted share vesting		175		17		(19,572	)		—		—			—			—			(19,555	)		—		(19,555	)
Tax withholdings on restricted share vestings																												175		17		(19,572	)		—		—			—			—			(19,555	)		—		(19,555	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net		—		—		—			—		(17,914	)		—			—			(17,914	)		—		(17,914	)		—		—		—			—		(17,914	)		—			—			(17,914	)		—		(17,914	)
Currency translation adjustment		—		—		—			—		(6,103	)		—			—			(6,103	)		—		(6,103	)		—		—		—			—		(6,103	)		—			—			(6,103	)		—		(6,103	)
Repurchases of common stock		—		—		(392	)		—		—			34			(5,446	)		(5,838	)		—		(5,838	)		—		—		(392	)		—		—			34			(5,446	)		(5,838	)		—		(5,838	)
Treasury stock issued under stock purchase plans		—		—		5			—		—			(34	)		5,447			5,452			—		5,452			—		—		5			—		—			(34	)		5,447			5,452			—		5,452
Post-retirement benefit costs											(109	)								(109	)				(109	)		—		—		—			—		(109	)		—			—			(109	)				(109	)
BALANCE, June 30, 2019		42,314	$	4,231	$	576,277		$	2,410,164	$	(43,156	)		17,434		$	(576,185	)	$	2,371,331		$	135	$	2,371,466			42,314	$	4,231	$	576,277		$	2,410,164	$	(43,156	)		17,434		$	(576,185	)	$	2,371,331		$	135	$	2,371,466
Net income																												—		—		—			321,480		—			—			—			321,480			—		321,480
Stock-based compensation expense																												—		—		29,302			—		—			—			—			29,302			—		29,302
Tax withholdings on restricted share vestings																												211		22		(31,293	)		—		—			—			—			(31,271	)		—		(31,271	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net																												—		—		—			—		(24,280	)		—			—			(24,280	)		—		(24,280	)
Currency translation adjustment																												—		—		—			—		(4,990	)		—			—			(4,990	)		—		(4,990	)
Repurchases of common stock																												—		—		(622	)		—		—			34			(7,184	)		(7,806	)		—		(7,806	)
Treasury stock issued under stock purchase plans																												—		—		80			—		—			(36	)		7,188			7,268			—		7,268
Post-retirement benefit costs																												—		—		—			—		141			—			—			141			—		141
BALANCE, June 30, 2020																												42,525	$	4,253	$	573,744		$	2,731,644	$	(72,285	)		17,432		$	(576,181	)	$	2,661,175		$	135	$	2,661,310

CACI International Inc ~~along~~(collectively, with its ~~wholly-owned~~consolidated subsidiaries, the Company, we, us and ~~joint ventures that are majority owned or otherwise controlled by it (collectively, the Company),~~our) is ~~an international~~a leading provider of information solutions and services ~~provider~~primarily to ~~its customers, primarily~~ the U.S. government. Other customers include state and local governments, commercial enterprises and agencies of foreign governments.

The Company’s operations are subject to certain risks and uncertainties including, among others, the dependence on contracts with federal government agencies, dependence on revenue derived from contracts awarded through competitive bidding, existence of contracts with fixed pricing, dependence on subcontractors to fulfill contractual obligations, dependence on key management personnel, ability to attract and retain qualified employees, ability to successfully integrate acquired companies, and current and potential competitors with greater resources.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and include the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows for the Company, including its subsidiaries and ventures that are majority-owned or otherwise controlled by the Company. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, ~~and~~the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported periods. The most significant of these estimates and assumptions relate to estimating contract revenue and costs, measuring progress against the Company’s performance obligations, assessing the fair value of ~~its~~ acquired assets and liabilities accounted for through business acquisitions, valuing and determining the amortization periods for long-lived intangible assets, assessing the recoverability of long-lived assets, reserves for accounts receivable, and reserves for contract related matters. Management evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis using the most current and available information. However, actual results may differ significantly from estimates. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known.

At contract inception, the Company determines whether the goods or services to be provided are to be accounted for as a single performance obligation or as multiple performance obligations. This evaluation requires professional judgment and it may impact the timing and pattern of revenue recognition. If multiple performance obligations are identified, we generally use the cost plus a margin approach to determine the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation.

Costs of revenue ~~include~~includes all direct contract costs ~~including~~such as labor, materials, subcontractor costs, ~~as well as~~and indirect ~~overhead~~ costs ~~and selling, general and administrative expenses~~ that are allowable and allocable to contracts under federal procurement standards. Costs of revenue also ~~include~~includes expenses that are unallowable under applicable procurement standards and are not allocable to contracts for billing purposes. Such unallowable expenses do not directly generate revenue but are necessary for business operations.

Accounts receivable are recorded at amounts earned less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company periodically reassesses ~~the adequacy of~~ its allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing reasonably available information as of the balance sheet date, including the length of time that the receivable has been outstanding, historical bad debts and aging trends, and other general and contract specific factors. Upon determination that a specific receivable is uncollectible, the receivable is written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts ~~reserve~~reserve.

Contract assets include unbilled receivables in which our right to consideration is conditional on factors other than the passage of time. Contract assets exclude billed and billable receivables.

In addition, the costs to fulfill and obtain a contract are considered for capitalization based on contract specific facts and circumstances. The incremental costs to fulfill a contract (e.g. ramp up costs at the beginning of the period of performance) may be capitalized when expenses are incurred prior to satisfying a performance obligation. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract (e.g. sales commissions) are capitalized as an asset when the Company expects to recover them either directly or indirectly through the revenue arrangement’s profit margins. These capitalized costs are subsequently expensed over the revenue arrangement’s period of performance. The Company has elected to apply the practical expedient to immediately expense the costs to obtain a contract when the performance obligation will be completed within twelve months of contract inception.

Contract assets are periodically reassessed based on reasonably available information as of the balance sheet date to ensure they do not exceed their net realizable value.

Contract liabilities primarily include advance payments received from ~~the~~a customer in excess of revenue that may be recognized as of the balance sheet date. The advance payment is subsequently recognized into revenue as the performance obligation is satisfied.

The Company’s remaining performance obligations balance represents the expected revenue to be recognized for the satisfaction of remaining performance obligations on our existing contracts as of period end. The remaining performance obligations balance excludes unexercised contract option years and task orders that may be issued underneath an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) ~~vehicle.~~vehicle until such task orders are issued. The remaining performance obligations balance generally increases with the execution of new contracts and converts into revenue as our contractual performance obligations are satisfied.

The Company continues to monitor our remaining performance obligations balance as it is subject to change from execution of new contracts, contract modifications or extensions, government deobligations, or early terminations. Based on this analysis, an adjustment to the period end balance may be required.

The Company considers all investments with an original maturity of three months or ~~fewer~~less on their trade date to be cash equivalents. The Company classifies investments with an original maturity of more than three months but ~~fewer~~less than twelve months on their trade date as short-term marketable securities.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. A provision for damaged, deteriorated, or obsolete inventory is recorded based on historical usage patterns and forecasted sales. As of June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company had $47.2 million and $25.9 million of net inventory, respectively, included within prepaid expenses and other current assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The purchase price of an acquired business is allocated to the tangible assets and separately identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values, with the excess recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of the acquired intangibles requires significant judgment in selecting underlying assumptions, including projected revenue growth rates, profit margins, and discount rates. In some cases, the Company uses discounted cash flow analyses, which were based on our best estimate of future sales, earnings and cash flows after considering such factors as general market conditions, customer budgets, existing firm and future orders, changes in working capital, long-term business plans and recent operating performance. Use of different estimates and judgments could yield materially different results.

The Company evaluates goodwill at least annually for impairment, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The evaluation includes comparing the fair value of the relevant reporting unit to the carrying value, including goodwill, of such unit. The level at which the Company tests goodwill for impairment requires management to determine whether the operations below the operating segments constitute a self-sustaining business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment loss is recognized. However, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit may be impaired. Impairment is measured by comparing the implied fair value of the goodwill to its carrying value. Separately identifiable intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment if impairment indicators are present.

As part of the annual assessment, the Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units using both an income approach and a market approach. The valuation process considers management’s estimates of the future operating performance of each reporting unit. Companies in similar industries are researched and analyzed and management considers the domestic and international economic and financial market conditions, both in general and specific to the industry in which the Company operates, prevailing as of the valuation date. The income approach utilizes discounted cash flows. The Company calculates a weighted average cost of capital for each reporting unit in order to estimate the discounted cash flows.

The Company evaluates goodwill as of the first day of the fiscal fourth quarter. In addition, the Company will perform interim impairment testing should circumstances requiring it arise. The Company completed its annual goodwill assessment as of April 1, ~~2019~~2020 and no impairment charge was necessary as a result of this assessment.

The Company enters into contractual arrangements primarily for the use of real estate facilities, information technology equipment, and certain other equipment. These arrangements contain a lease when the Company controls the underlying asset and has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits or outputs from the asset. All of our leases are operating leases.

The Company records a right of use (ROU) asset and lease liability as of the lease commencement date equal to the present value of the remaining lease payments. Most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate that can be readily determined. Therefore, we use a discount rate based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate, which is determined using our credit rating and information available as of the commencement date. The ROU asset is then adjusted for initial direct costs and certain lease incentives included in the contractual arrangement. The Company has elected to not apply the lease recognition guidance for short-term equipment leases and to separate lease from non-lease components. Our operating lease arrangements may contain options to extend the lease term or for early termination. We account for these options when it is reasonably certain we will exercise them. ROU assets are evaluated for impairment in a manner consistent with the treatment of other long-lived assets.

Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is recorded primarily within indirect costs and selling expenses on the consolidated statement of operations. Variable lease expenses are generally recorded in the period they are incurred and are excluded from the ROU asset and lease liability.

Long-lived assets such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized if the sum of the long-term undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the long-lived asset being evaluated. Any write-downs are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying amount of the assets. Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation of equipment and furniture has been provided over the estimated useful life of the respective assets (ranging from three to eight years) using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are generally amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining lease term or the useful life of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Separately identifiable definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives.

Costs incurred in creating a software product to be sold or licensed for external use are ~~charged to expense when~~expensed as incurred ~~as indirect costs and selling expenses~~ until technological feasibility has been ~~established for the software.~~established. Technological feasibility is established upon completion of a detailed program design or, in its absence, completion of a working ~~software version.~~model. Thereafter, all such software development costs are capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of unamortized cost or estimated net realizable value. Capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining estimated economic life of the product.

The Company maintains the CACI International Inc Group Executive Retirement Plan (the Supplemental Savings Plan) and maintains the underlying assets in a Rabbi Trust. The Supplemental Savings Plan is a non-qualified defined contribution supplemental retirement savings plan for certain key employees whereby participants may elect to defer and contribute a portion of their compensation, as permitted by the plan. Each participant directs his or her investments in the Supplemental Savings Plan (see Note ~~20)~~21).

A Rabbi Trust is a grantor trust established to fund compensation for a select group of management. The assets of this trust are available to satisfy the claims of general creditors in the event of bankruptcy of the Company. The assets held by the Rabbi Trust are invested in corporate owned life insurance (COLI) products. The COLI products are recorded at cash surrender value in the consolidated financial statements as supplemental retirement savings plan assets. The amounts due to participants are based on contributions, participant investment elections, and other participant activity and are recorded as supplemental retirement savings plan obligations.

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities, and their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. The Company accounts for tax contingencies in accordance with ASC 740-10-25, Income Taxes – Recognition. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities due to a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Estimates of the realizability of deferred tax assets are based on the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies. Any interest or penalties incurred in connection with income taxes are recorded as part of income tax expense for financial reporting purposes.

Costs associated with legal, financial and other professional advisors related to acquisitions, whether successful or unsuccessful, are expensed as incurred.

The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the exchange rate in effect on the reporting date, and income and expenses are translated at the weighted-average exchange rate during the period. The Company’s primary practice is to negotiate contracts in the same currency in which the predominant expenses are incurred, thereby mitigating the exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. The net translation gains and losses are not included in ~~determining~~ net income, but are accumulated as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are ~~included~~recorded as incurred in ~~determining net income, but are insignificant. These costs are included as~~ indirect costs and selling expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock but not securities that are anti-dilutive, including stock options and stock settled stock appreciation rights (SSARs) with an exercise price greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock. Using the treasury stock method, diluted earnings per share includes the incremental effect of SSARs, stock options, restricted shares, and those restricted stock ~~unit~~units (RSUs) that are no longer subject to a market or performance condition. Information about the weighted-average number of basic and diluted shares is presented in Note ~~23.~~24.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and amounts included in other current assets and current liabilities that meet the definition of a financial instrument approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these amounts.

The fair value of the Company’s debt under its bank credit facility approximates its carrying value at June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. The fair value of the Company’s debt under its bank credit facility was estimated using Level 2 inputs based on market data on companies with a corporate rating similar to CACI’s that have recently priced credit facilities.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk include accounts receivable and cash equivalents. Management believes that credit risk related to the Company’s accounts receivable is limited due to a large number of customers in differing segments and agencies of the U.S. government. Accounts receivable credit risk is also limited due to the credit worthiness of the U.S. government. Management believes the credit risk associated with the Company’s cash equivalents is limited due to the credit worthiness of the obligors of the investments underlying the cash equivalents. In addition, although the Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions that exceed federally insured limits, these balances are placed with high quality financial institutions.

The Company accounts for receivable transfers under its Master Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement (MARPA) as sales under ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, and derecognizes the sold receivables from its balance sheets.

Comprehensive income is the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenue, expenses, and gains and losses that under U.S. GAAP are included in comprehensive income, but excluded from the determination of net income. The elements within other comprehensive income consist of foreign currency translation adjustments; the changes in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements, net of tax of $8.7 million, $6.4 million ~~$4.2 million~~ and ~~$9.5~~$4.2 million for the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 ~~2018~~ and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively; and differences between actual amounts and estimates based on actuarial assumptions and the effect of changes in actuarial assumptions made under the Company’s post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax (see Note ~~16)~~17).

As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, accumulated other comprehensive loss included a loss of ~~$33.6~~$38.6 million and ~~$27.5~~$33.6 million, respectively, related to foreign currency translation adjustments, a loss of ~~$9.0~~$33.2 million and ~~a gain of $0.9~~$9.0 million, respectively, related to the fair value of its interest rate swap agreements, and a loss of ~~$0.6~~$0.5 million and ~~$0.5~~$0.6 million, respectively, related to unrecognized post-retirement costs.

The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims, and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management is of the opinion that any liability or loss associated with such matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations and liquidity. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated.

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which aligns the capitalization requirements for implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the existing capitalization requirements for implementation costs associated with internal-use software (Subtopic 350-40). ASU 2018-15 becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of FY2021 and ~~may be adopted either retrospectively or prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its financial statements.~~

~~In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07,~~ ~~Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost~~, which changes the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement cost (net benefit cost) on the consolidated statements of operations. The service cost component of net benefit cost will continue to be part of operating income while all other components of net benefit cost (interest costs, actuarial gains and losses and amortization of prior service cost) will be ~~shown outside~~applied prospectively. We do not expect a significant impact to our operating results, financial position or cash flows as a result of ~~operating income. The Company adopted~~adopting this new standard ~~on July 1, 2018 and applied the standard retrospectively. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.~~.

In ~~August~~June 2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016-15,~~ ~~Classification~~2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, which requires companies to record an allowance for expected credit losses over the contractual term of ~~Certain Cash Receipts~~financial assets, including short-term trade receivables and ~~Cash Payments, which clarifies how certain~~contract assets, and expands disclosure requirements for credit quality of financial assets. ASU 2016-13 becomes effective for the Company in the first quarter of FY2021. We do not expect a significant impact to our operating results, financial position or cash ~~receipts~~flows as a result of adopting this new standard.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. This ASU provides optional expedients and ~~cash payments are presented~~exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships and ~~classified on~~other transactions that reference the ~~statement~~London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The guidance in this ASU is optional and expedients may be elected over time through December 31, 2022, as reference rate reform activities occur. During the fourth quarter of FY2020, CACI elected to apply the hedge accounting expedients related to probability and the assessments of effectiveness for future LIBOR-indexed cash flows to ~~reduce diversity~~assume that the index upon which future hedged transactions will be based matches the index on the corresponding derivatives consistent with past presentation. Application of these expedients assisted in ~~practice.~~preserving the Company's presentation of derivatives as qualifying cash flow hedges. The Company ~~adopted~~continues to evaluate this ~~standard on July 1, 2018~~guidance and ~~applied~~may apply other elections, as applicable, as additional changes in the standard retrospectively. As a result of adoption, the Company reclassified $3.7 million of proceeds received from the settlement of corporate owned life insurance (COLI) policies from operating activities to investing activities on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended June 30, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, $2.7 million of COLI proceeds are presented as investing activities. market occur.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which amends the existing guidance on accounting for leases. The new standard requires lessees to put virtually all leases on the balance sheet by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged from that applied under previous guidance. The amended guidance iswas effective for the fiscal year, and interim periods within that fiscal year, beginning after December 15, 2018, and requires a modified retrospective approach. ~~Early adoption is permitted.~~

The Company adopted this standard on July 1, ~~2019 for its FY2020, and has substantially completed its adoption, including measuring~~2019. As part of our implementation, the Company accumulated data required to measure its existing leases, ~~reviewing~~reviewed lease contracts, ~~implementing~~implemented a new lease accounting solution and ~~establishing~~evaluated accounting policy and internal control changes. The Company ~~has elected to adopt~~adopted certain practical expedients provided under ASC 842, including reassessment of whether expired or existing contracts contain leases, reassessment of lease classification for expired or existing leases, ~~and~~ reassessing initial direct costs for existing ~~leases. We expect that upon~~leases, and an election to separate lease from non-lease components.

Upon adoption ~~we will recognize a right-of-use asset ranging from $345-$365~~of ASC 842, the Company recorded right of use assets of $354.3 million and current and non-current lease ~~liability ranging from $390-$410~~liabilities of $67.0 million and $331.8 million, respectively, on ~~our~~the consolidated balance sheet, ~~which is~~ inclusive of required conforming balance sheet reclassifications. We do not expect the standard to have a material impact on our cash flows or results of operations. The Company is continuing to refine its processes in order to meet the accounting and disclosure requirements upon adoption of Topic 842 in the first quarter of FY2020.

~~In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~, as amended (ASC 606), which superseded nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitledreclassifications for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than were required under previous GAAP. In addition, ASU 2014-09 added ASC 340-40 to codify guidance on other assetsprepaid and deferred ~~costs for contracts with customers.~~

Effective July 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method, whereby the cumulative effect of applying the standard was recognized through shareholders’ equity on the date of adoption. In addition, for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2019rent, lease incentives, and the interim reporting periods therein, the Company is required to disclose the amount by which each financial statement line item was affected by the new standard. The Company’s comparative information, for prior periods presented before July 1, 2018, has not been restated and continues to be reported under ASC 605.other lease-related balances.

The impact of adoption on our consolidated balance sheet is as follows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2018 As Reported Under ASC 605		Adjustments Due to ASC 606		July 1, 2018 Balance Under ASC 606		June 30, 2019 As Reported Under ASC 840		Adjustments Due to ASC 842			July 1, 2019 Balance Under ASC 842
Assets:
Accounts receivable, net	$	806,871	$	20,454	$	827,325
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		58,126		2,342		60,468	$	89,652	$	(3,199	)	$	86,453
Other long-term assets		39,175		3,923		43,098
Operating lease right-of-use assets								—		354,317			354,317
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities		150,602		2,212		152,814		235,611		59,034			294,645
Deferred income taxes		200,880		6,639		207,519
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent								—		331,761			331,761
Other long-term liabilities		85,187		98		85,285		107,932		(39,677	)		68,255
Retained earnings		2,126,790		17,770		2,144,560

~~ASC 606 changed the pattern~~The standard had no impact on our results of revenue recognition for some of our contracts with customers. For our award and incentive fee contracts, we recognize an estimated amount of variable consideration throughout the performance period rather than defer recognition of the relevant portion of fee until customer notification ofoperations or cash flows. In addition, new disclosures are provided to enable users to assess the amount, ~~earned. Some~~timing and uncertainty of our fixed price services-type contracts in which revenue was previously recognized on a straight-line basis over the performance period converted to recognition of revenue using a cost-to-cost input method to measure our progress towards the complete satisfaction of the performance obligation. The cumulative effect of these changes in the pattern of revenue recognition resulted in an increase to accounts receivable with an offset to retained earnings.

In addition, ASC 606 changed the timing of revenue recognition for license renewal performance obligations. Under prior GAAP, license renewals were generally recognized in the period the renewal contract was executed. However, upon adoption of ASC 606, the consideration received for a license renewal may not be recognized until the start of the term of the renewal. The cumulative effect of this change resulted in an increase to contract liabilities with an offset to retained earnings.

The adoption of ASC 606 did not have a material impact on the Company’s revenue recognition for cost-plus-fee, fixed price/level-of-effort, time-and-materials (T&M), fixed price contracts previously recognized under ASC 605-35, and fixed price product revenue arrangements.

Under ASC 340-40, the Company capitalizes certain costs to fulfill and obtain a contract. The cumulative effect of this change resulted in an increase to contract assets with an offset to retained earnings. These capitalized costs are amortized over the period of contract performance as revenue is recognizedcash flows arising from ~~the transfer of goods or services and the underlying performance obligation is satisfied.~~ leases.

In addition, under the modified retrospective approach for adopting ASC 606, for FY2019 and the interim reporting periods therein, the Company is required to disclose the amount by which each financial statement line item was affected by the new standard. The Company’s comparative information, for prior periods presented before July 1, 2018, has not been restated and continues to be reported under ASC 605. The table below presents the impact of adoption of ASC 606 on our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2019 (in thousands):

~~For the year ended June 30, 2019, the effect of ASC 606 was primarily related to the timing of award and incentive fee revenue recognition.~~

~~The table below presents the impact of adoption of ASC 606 on our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2019 (in thousands):~~

During the second quarter of FY2020, CACI completed 3 strategic acquisitions adding key capabilities in mission expertise and technology. The aggregate purchase consideration was approximately $109.4 million. The Company preliminarily recognized fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and allocated $70.3 million to goodwill and $29.5 million to intangible assets. At June 30, 2020, the Company had not finalized the determination of fair values allocated to assets and liabilities.

On June 29, 2020, CACI entered into an agreement to acquire Ascent Vision Technologies (AVT) for a purchase price of approximately $350.0 million. On August 11, 2020, CACI completed the acquisition. AVT specializes in Electro-Optical Infrared payloads, On-Board Computer Vision Processing and C-UAS Solutions.

On August 15, 2018, CACI acquired certain assets of the systems engineering and acquisition support services business unit (SE&A BU) of CSRA LLC, a managed affiliate of General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. ~~The initial~~for purchase consideration ~~paid at closing to acquire the SE&A BU was $84.0 million plus $6.0 million representing a preliminary net working capital adjustment. Subsequent to closing, CACI made an additional payment~~ of ~~$4.4 million to the sellers for a net working capital adjustment.~~$96.1 million. The Company recognized fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and allocated ~~$44.0~~$46.4 million to goodwill and $8.9 million to intangible assets. The intangible assets consist of customer relationships. Of the value attributed to goodwill and intangible assets, approximately ~~$52.9~~$55.3 million is deductible for income tax purposes. The final purchase price allocation was completed in Q1 FY2020. The differences between the preliminary and final purchase price allocation did not have a material impact on CACI’s results of operations or financial position.

On January 29, 2019, CACI acquired all of the equity interests of Mastodon Design LLC (Mastodon) for a purchase consideration of $225.0 million, which includes a $220.0 million initial cash payment and $5.0 million of deferred consideration. Mastodon specializes in the rapid design of rugged tactical communications, signals intelligence (SIGINT) and electronic warfare (EW) equipment.

The Company recognized fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and allocated $139.2 million to goodwill and $83.9 million to intangible assets. The goodwill of $139.2 million is largely attributable to the assembled workforce of Mastodon and expected synergies between the Company and Mastodon. The intangible assets consist of customer relationships of $19.8 million and technology of $64.1 million. The ~~estimated~~ fair value attributed to intangible assets is being amortized on an accelerated basis over approximately 20 years for customer relationships and over a range of approximately 5 to 9 years for technology. The fair value attributed to the intangible assets acquired was based on ~~preliminary estimates,~~ assumptions and other information compiled by management, including independent valuations that utilized established valuation techniques. Of the value attributed to goodwill and intangible assets, approximately $223.1 million is deductible for income tax purposes. ~~The final purchase price allocation, which is provisional~~During the year ended June 30, 2020, CACI finalized its valuation of assets acquired and ~~is expected to be completed by Q3 FY2020, will be based on final analysis of fair values of acquired assets and liabilities.~~liabilities assumed.

On March 1, 2019, CACI acquired all of the equity interests of Legos Intermediate Holdings, LLC and MDCP Legos Blocker, Inc., the parent companies of LGS Innovations (LGS). The purchase consideration is approximately $750.5 million, which includes $759.9 million of cash paid at close net of cash acquired partially offset by a $9.4 million estimated net purchase price reduction for returnable consideration, deferred consideration, and estimated post-close net working capital adjustments.was $758.2 million. LGS is a leading provider of SIGINT and cyber products and solutions to the Intelligence Community and Department of Defense.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, CACI ~~is in the process of finalizing~~finalized its valuation of ~~all the~~ assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As the amounts recorded for certain assets and liabilities are preliminary in nature, they are subject to adjustment as additional information is obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. The final determination of fair values of certain assets and liabilities will be completed within the measurement period of up to one-year from the acquisition date as permitted under GAAP. The LGS acquisition could necessitate the need to use the full one-year measurement period to adequately analyze and assess several factors used in establishing the asset and liability fair values as of the acquisition date, including intangible assets, receivables, inventory, deferred revenue, deferred taxes, income tax obligations, and certain reserves. Any potential adjustments made could be material in relation to the preliminary values presented in the table below. Based on the Company’s preliminary valuation, the total estimatedTotal purchase consideration of ~~$750.5~~$758.2 million has been allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in thousands):

Accounts receivable	$	83,320		$	85,066
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		20,781			19,922
Property and equipment		23,283			23,275
Intangible assets		147,650			147,650
Goodwill		526,879			530,826
Other long-term assets		877			127
Accounts payable		(10,309	)		(10,309	)
Accrued compensation and benefits		(22,347	)		(22,347	)
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities		(8,823	)		(9,876	)
Deferred income taxes		(5,171	)
Deferred income taxes, noncurrent					60
Other long-term liabilities		(5,644	)		(6,243	)
Total estimated consideration	$	750,496		$	758,151

During the quarter ended June 30, 2019 we continued to obtain information to refine estimated fair values. As a result of the additional information, the Company recorded measurement period adjustments reducing total consideration by $9.0 million related to an estimated net working capital adjustment. In addition, the Company recorded measurement period adjustments that increased deferred income tax liabilities and goodwill by approximately $5.2 million.

The goodwill of ~~$526.9~~$530.8 million is largely attributable to the assembled workforce of LGS and expected synergies between the Company and LGS. The intangible assets consist of customer relationships of $86.9 million and technology of $60.8 million. The estimated fair value attributed to intangible assets is being amortized on an accelerated basis over approximately 20 years for customer relationships and over a range of approximately 5 to 15 years for technology. The fair value attributed to the intangible assets acquired was based on ~~preliminary estimates,~~ assumptions and other information compiled by management, including independent valuations that utilized established valuation techniques. Of the value attributed to goodwill and intangible assets, approximately ~~$589.1~~$599.9 million is deductible for income tax purposes.

From the March 1, 2019 acquisition date through June 30, 2019, LGS generated $132.3 million of revenue and $1.3 million of net income. LGS’ net income includes the impact of $5.2 million of amortization of intangibles and $2.6 million of integration and restructuring costs from the acquisition date through June 30, 2019. LGS’ net income does not include $11.4 million of acquisition-related expenses during the year ended June 30, 2019, which are included in indirect costs and selling expenses.

The following pro forma results are prepared for comparative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the results that would have occurred had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the years presented or the results which may occur in the future. The following unaudited pro forma results of operations assume the LGS acquisition had occurred on July 1, 2017 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Significant pro forma adjustments incorporated into the pro forma results above include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to debt incurred to finance the acquisition. Significant nonrecurring adjustments include the elimination of non-recurring acquisition-related expenses incurred during the year ended June 30, 2019.

Effective June 1, 2019 CACI Limited acquired 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Mood Enterprises Limited, a United Kingdom company that provides software and managed services to defense, national security and commercial organizations. Its technology platform improves enterprise transparency and enables significant improvement in business processes and is typically deployed in organizations with complex data environments where access to critical information in a timely manner is essential. The purchase consideration was approximately $9.1 million, which includes initial cash payments and deferred consideration.

On November 22, 2017, CACI acquired 100 percent of the outstanding membership interests of a business in the United States which provides cyber solutions. The acquisition was financed with cash on hand. The purchase consideration was $53.0 million, which includes a $40.1 million initial cash payment, $4.5 million of deferred consideration, $8.7 million estimated fair value of contingent consideration to be paid upon achieving certain metrics and a $0.3 million refund from the seller for a net working capital adjustment. The Company recognized fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and allocated $26.7 million to goodwill and $24.9 million to intangible assets. The intangible assets primarily consist of customer relationships and acquired technology. The purchase price and purchase price allocation was finalized as of March 31, 2018, with no significant changes to preliminary amounts.

On May 31, 2018, CACI acquired certain assets of an entity in the United States which constituted a business, providing Enterprise IT solutions. The purchase consideration was $24.0 million, consisting of cash paid at closing. The Company recognized fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and allocated $8.4 million to goodwill and $14.9 million to intangible assets. The intangible assets consist of customer relationships. The final purchase price allocation was completed during FY2019. The differences between the preliminary and final purchase price allocation did not have a material impact on CACI’s results of operations or financial position.

On October 1, 2017, CACI Limited acquired 100 percent of the outstanding shares of a United Kingdom ~~(U.K.)~~ IT consulting services and software engineering company. The purchase consideration was approximately $9.1 million, which includes initial cash payments, deferred consideration and an estimated net working capital payment.

On November 1, 2017, CACI Limited acquired 100 percent of the outstanding shares of a London-based software and mapping data company. The acquired company provides geographical information systems, logistics and route optimization software and related map data. The purchase consideration was approximately $7.5 million, which includes initial cash payments, deferred consideration and an estimated net working capital payment.

On October 1, 2016, CACI Limited acquired a business in the United Kingdom that provides outsourced database managed services and associated database segmentation and analytics for large corporate customers. The purchase consideration for this business was approximately $2.8 million, which includes initial cash payments, deferred consideration and contingent consideration to be paid upon achieving certain metrics.

Total accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.0 million, $4.2 million, ~~$3.7 million,~~ and ~~$3.6~~$3.7 million at June 30, 2020, 2019, ~~2018,~~ and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30,				June 30,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Billed receivables	$	638,135	$	625,336	$	555,472	$	638,135
Billable receivables		141,632		129,183		223,867		141,632
Unbilled receivables		90,073		52,352		61,888		90,073
Total accounts receivable, current		869,840		806,871		841,227		869,840
Unbilled receivables, long-term		7,381		8,620		9,629		7,381
Total accounts receivable	$	877,221	$	815,491	$	850,856	$	877,221

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 are as follows (in thousands):

	Domestic		International			Total			Domestic		International			Total
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	2,479,496	$	97,939		$	2,577,435
Goodwill acquired (1)		35,024		6,867			41,891
Foreign currency translation		—		1,509			1,509
Balance at June 30, 2018	$	2,514,520	$	106,315		$	2,620,835		$	2,514,520	$	106,315		$	2,620,835
Goodwill acquired (1)		710,165		9,038			719,203			710,165		9,038			719,203
Foreign currency translation		—		(3,959	)		(3,959	)		—		(3,959	)		(3,959	)
Balance at June 30, 2019	$	3,224,685	$	111,394		$	3,336,079		$	3,224,685	$	111,394		$	3,336,079
Goodwill acquired (1)										55,171		19,978			75,149
Foreign currency translation										—		(4,118	)		(4,118	)
Balance at June 30, 2020									$	3,279,856	$	127,254		$	3,407,110

	June 30,						June 30,
	2019			2018 (1)			2020 (1)			2019
Intangible assets
Customer contracts and related customer relationships	$	549,552		$	435,933		$	570,562		$	549,552
Acquired technologies		137,959			13,237			129,925			137,959
Other		800			804			8			800
Intangible assets		688,311			449,974			700,495			688,311
Less accumulated amortization
Customer contracts and related customer relationships		(236,935	)		(199,018	)		(271,708	)		(236,935	)
Acquired technologies		(14,750	)		(8,761	)		(21,900	)		(14,750	)
Other		(511	)		(440	)		(2	)		(511	)
Accumulated amortization		(252,196	)		(208,219	)		(293,610	)		(252,196	)
Total intangible assets, net	$	436,115		$	241,755		$	406,885		$	436,115

Intangible assets are primarily amortized on an accelerated basis over periods ranging from one to twenty years. The weighted-average period of amortization for customer contracts and related customer relationships as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 is ~~16.6~~17.0 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is ~~13.9~~13.6 years. The weighted-average period of amortization for acquired technologies as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 is ~~10.3~~10.4 years, and the weighted-average remaining period of amortization is ~~9.9~~9.0 years.

Amortization expense for the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ was $59.3 million, $45.8 million ~~$38.2 million~~ and ~~$40.7~~$38.2 million, respectively. Expected amortization expense for each of the fiscal years through June 30, ~~2024~~2025 and for years thereafter is as follows (in thousands):

	Amount		Amount
Year ending June 30, 2020	$	57,616
Year ending June 30, 2021		56,467	$	58,273
Year ending June 30, 2022		53,318		55,174
Year ending June 30, 2023		48,143		50,071
Year ending June 30, 2024		41,401		43,289
Year ending June 30, 2025				37,046
Thereafter		179,170		163,032
Total intangible assets, net	$	436,115	$	406,885

	June 30,						June 30,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Equipment and furniture	$	193,940		$	152,682		$	214,107		$	193,940
Leasehold improvements		149,935			109,849			160,723			149,935
Property and equipment, at cost		343,875			262,531			374,830			343,875
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(194,199	)		(161,391	)		(204,309	)		(194,199	)
Total property and equipment, net	$	149,676		$	101,140		$	170,521		$	149,676

Depreciation expense, including amortization of leasehold improvements, was $49.4 million, $36.4 million ~~$30.7 million~~ and ~~$27.5~~$30.7 million for the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively.

	June 30,				June 30,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Accrued salaries and withholdings	$	164,631	$	144,213	$	178,293	$	164,631
Accrued leave		97,832		88,547		123,972		97,832
Accrued fringe benefits		27,811		26,682		36,495		27,811
Total accrued compensation and benefits	$	290,274	$	259,442	$	338,760	$	290,274

Other accrued expenses and current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30,				June 30,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Vendor obligations	$	90,238	$	91,048	$	82,104	$	90,238
Deferred revenue (see Note 12)		55,667		41,744
MARPA Facility payable (see Note 13)		54,567		—
Deferred revenue (Note 12)						57,082		55,667
MARPA payable (Note 14)						57,020		54,567
Operating lease liabilities, current (Note 16)						67,549		—
Other		35,139		17,810		29,763		35,139
Total other accrued expenses and current liabilities	$	235,611	$	150,602	$	293,518	$	235,611

We disaggregate our revenue arrangements by contract type, customer, and whether the Company performs on the contract as the prime or subcontractor. We believe that these categories allow for a better understanding of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from our contracts.

The Company generated revenue on our cost-plus-fee, firm fixed-price, ~~(including proprietary software product sales),~~ and time-and-materials contracts as follows during the year ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

	Year Ended June 30, 2019						Year Ended June 30, 2020						Year Ended June 30, 2019
	Domestic		International		Total		Domestic		International		Total		Domestic		International		Total
Cost-plus-fee	$	2,764,291	$	—	$	2,764,291	$	3,274,707	$	—	$	3,274,707	$	2,764,291	$	—	$	2,764,291
Firm fixed-price		1,365,052		100,507		1,465,559		1,524,381		105,094		1,629,475		1,365,052		100,507		1,465,559
Time and materials		700,107		56,384		756,491		757,584		58,276		815,860		700,107		56,384		756,491
Total	$	4,829,450	$	156,891	$	4,986,341	$	5,556,672	$	163,370	$	5,720,042	$	4,829,450	$	156,891	$	4,986,341

The Company generated revenue from our primary customer groups as follows during the year ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

	Year Ended June 30, 2019						Year Ended June 30, 2020						Year Ended June 30, 2019
	Domestic		International		Total		Domestic		International		Total		Domestic		International		Total
Department of Defense	$	3,489,854	$	—	$	3,489,854	$	3,999,261	$	—	$	3,999,261	$	3,489,854	$	—	$	3,489,854
Federal civilian agencies		1,263,681		—		1,263,681		1,467,801		—		1,467,801		1,263,681		—		1,263,681
Commercial and other		75,915		156,891		232,806		89,610		163,370		252,980		75,915		156,891		232,806
Total	$	4,829,450	$	156,891	$	4,986,341	$	5,556,672	$	163,370	$	5,720,042	$	4,829,450	$	156,891	$	4,986,341

The Company generated revenue as either the prime or subcontractor as follows during the year ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):

	Year Ended June 30, 2019						Year Ended June 30, 2020						Year Ended June 30, 2019
	Domestic		International		Total		Domestic		International		Total		Domestic		International		Total
Prime contractor	$	4,429,439	$	156,891	$	4,586,330	$	5,057,930	$	163,370	$	5,221,300	$	4,429,439	$	156,891	$	4,586,330
Subcontractor		400,011		—		400,011		498,742		—		498,742		400,011		—		400,011
Total	$	4,829,450	$	156,891	$	4,986,341	$	5,556,672	$	163,370	$	5,720,042	$	4,829,450	$	156,891	$	4,986,341

~~The~~For many of our fixed price revenue arrangements and for revenue arrangements that have award or incentive fees, the Company uses an estimate at completion (EAC) ~~as the basis~~ to measure progress towards the complete satisfaction of its ~~contractual~~ performance ~~obligations, for each of its contracts in which~~obligations. For these revenue arrangements, revenue is recognized over time primarily using a ~~percentage~~cost-to-cost input method based on the ratio of ~~completion calculation.~~costs incurred to date to total estimated costs at completion. The EAC process requires the Company to use professional judgment when assessing risks, estimating contract revenue and costs, estimating variable consideration, and making assumptions for schedule and technical issues. The Company periodically reassesses its EAC assumptions and updates its estimates as needed. When estimates of total costs to be incurred on a contract exceed total revenue, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is recorded in the period in which the loss is determined.

Based on changes in a contract’s EAC, a cumulative adjustment to revenue will be recorded. ~~During~~For the ~~year ended~~twelve months June 30, 2020 and 2019, we recognized an increase to income before income taxes of $33.0 million ($0.95 per diluted share) and $19.7 million ($0.57 per diluted share), ~~from EAC adjustments.~~respectively. The Company used its statutory tax rate when calculating the impact to diluted earnings per share.

Revenue recognized from previously satisfied performance obligations was $10.5 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2020, compared with an immaterial amount for the twelve months ended June 30, 2019. The ~~Company records~~change in revenue generally relates to final true-up adjustments to ~~its~~our estimated award or incentive fees in the period in which we receive the customer’s final performance score or when we can determine that more objective, contractually-defined criteria have been fully satisfied. ~~These final true-up adjustments are disclosed as revenue recognized from previously satisfied performance obligations. For~~During the ~~year~~twelve months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the ~~revenue recognized from~~Company received notification that certain contract close out risks had been mitigated on previously satisfied performance obligations ~~was not material.~~and therefore recorded a reduction to its established reserve amount.

The Company’s remaining performance obligations balance as of period end represents the expected revenue to be recognized for the satisfaction of remaining performance obligations on our existing contracts. This balance excludes unexercised contract option years and task orders that may be issued underneath an IDIQ vehicle. Our remaining performance obligations balance as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$6.2~~$6.4 billion.

The Company expects to recognize approximately 7780 percent of our remaining performance obligations balance as revenue over the next year and the remaining 2320 percent ~~thereafter.~~thereafter.

Contract assets are primarily comprised of conditional unbilled receivables in which revenue has been recognized but an invoice has not yet been issued to the customer as of the balance sheet date. Contract assets exclude billed and billable receivables and are not stated above their net realizable value.

Contract liabilities are primarily comprised of advance payments in which consideration is received in advance of satisfying a performance obligation.

Description of Contract Related Balance	Financial Statement Classification	June 30, 2019			July 1, 2018 (1)			Financial Statement Classification	June 30, 2020			June 30, 2019
Contract assets – current:
Unbilled receivables	Accounts receivable, net	$	90,073		$	72,511		Accounts receivable, net	$	61,888		$	90,073
Costs to obtain – short-term	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,685			2,342		Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,492			2,685
Contract assets – noncurrent:
Unbilled receivables	Accounts receivable, long-term		7,381			8,620		Accounts receivable, long-term		9,629			7,381
Costs to obtain – long-term	Other long-term assets		5,353			3,923		Other long-term assets		7,708			5,353
Contract liabilities – current:
Deferred revenue and other contract liabilities	Other accrued expenses and current liabilities		(55,667	)		(43,940	)
Deferred revenue and other contract liabilities – short-term								Other accrued expenses and current liabilities		(57,082	)		(55,667	)
Contract liabilities – noncurrent:
Deferred revenue and other contract liabilities	Other long-term liabilities		(7,445	)		(4,740	)
Deferred revenue and other contract liabilities – long-term								Other long-term liabilities		(6,507	)		(7,445	)
Net contract assets (liabilities)		$	42,380		$	38,716			$	19,128		$	42,380

~~During FY2019,~~For the year ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, we recognized $48.7 million and $35.5 million of revenue that was included in a previously recorded contract liability as of the beginning of the period.

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (average cost or first-in, first-out) or net realizable value and are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company periodically assesses its current inventory balances and records a provision for damaged, deteriorated, or obsolete inventory based on historical patterns and forecasted sales.

On December ~~28, 2018,~~27, 2019, the Company ~~entered into a Master Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement (MARPA Facility)~~amended its MARPA with MUFG Bank, Ltd. (the Purchaser), for the sale of certain designated eligible U.S. government receivables. The ~~MARPA Facility has an initial~~amendment extended the term of ~~one-year.~~the MARPA to December 24, 2020. Under the MARPA, ~~Facility,~~ the Company can sell eligible receivables, including certain billed and unbilled receivables up to a maximum amount of $200.0 million. The Company’s receivables are sold under the MARPA ~~Facility~~ without recourse for any U.S. government credit risk.

The Company accounts for receivable transfers under the MARPA ~~Facility~~ as sales under ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, and derecognizes the sold receivables from its balance sheets. The fair value of the sold receivables approximated their book value due to their short-term nature.

The Company does not retain an ongoing financial interest in the transferred receivables other than cash collection and administrative services. The Company estimated that its servicing fee was at fair value and therefore no servicing asset or liability related to these receivables was recognized as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. Proceeds from the sold receivables are reflected in our operating cash flows on the statement of cash flows.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company sold $1.1 billion of receivables. The amount outstanding as of June 30, 2019 was $192.5 million. As of June 30, 2019, collections not remitted to the Purchaser related to the sold receivables were $54.6 million. This amount represents an obligation to the Purchaser and is included in other accrued expenses and current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company incurred purchase discount fees of $3.0 million, which are recorded within interest expense and other, net in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

				As of and for the Year Ended June 30,
	As of and for the Year Ended June 30, 2019			2020			2019
Beginning balance:				$	192,527		$	—
Sales of receivables	$	1,126,395			2,393,684			1,126,395
Cash collections		(933,868	)		(2,386,211	)		(933,868	)
Outstanding balance sold to Purchaser: (1)		192,527			200,000			192,527
Cash collected, not remitted to Purchaser (2)		(54,567	)		(57,020	)		(54,567	)
Remaining sold receivables	$	137,960		$	142,980		$	137,960

	June 30,						June 30,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Bank credit facility – term loans	$	891,475		$	938,394		$	844,555		$	891,475
Bank credit facility – revolver loans		785,000			135,000			569,000			785,000
Principal amount of long-term debt		1,676,475			1,073,394			1,413,555			1,676,475
Less unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs		(11,462	)		(11,054	)		(9,116	)		(11,462	)
Total long-term debt		1,665,013			1,062,340			1,404,439			1,665,013
Less current portion		(46,920	)		(46,920	)		(46,920	)		(46,920	)
Long-term debt, net of current portion	$	1,618,093		$	1,015,420		$	1,357,519		$	1,618,093

The Company has a $2,438.4 million credit facility (the Credit Facility), which consists of a $1,500.0 million revolving credit facility (the Revolving Facility) and a $938.4 million term loan (the Term Loan). The Revolving Facility has sub-facilities of $100.0 million for same-day swing line loan borrowings and $25.0 million for stand-by letters of credit. At any time and so long as no default has occurred, the Company has the right to increase the Revolving Facility or the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount of up to the greater of $500.0 million or an amount subject to 3.50 times senior secured leverage, calculated assuming the Revolving Facility is fully drawn, with applicable lender approvals. The Credit Facility is available to refinance existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital expenses and capital expenditures.

The Revolving Facility is a secured facility that permits continuously renewable borrowings of up to $1,500.0 million. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company had ~~$785.0~~$569.0 million outstanding under the Revolving Facility and no0 borrowings on the swing line. The Company pays a quarterly facility fee for the unused portion of the Revolving Facility.

The Term Loan is a five-year secured facility under which principal payments are due in quarterly installments of $11.7 million until the balance is due in full on June 30, 2024. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company had ~~$891.5~~$844.6 million outstanding under the Term Loan.

The interest rates applicable to loans under the Credit Facility are floating interest rates that, at the Company’s option, equal a base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus, in each case, an applicable rate based upon the Company’s consolidated total leverage ratio. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the effective interest rate, including the impact of the Company’s floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements and excluding the effect of amortization of debt financing costs, for the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was ~~3.81~~2.58 percent.

The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also includes customary negative covenants restricting or limiting the Company’s ability to guarantee or incur additional indebtedness, grant liens or other security interests to third parties, make loans or investments, transfer assets, declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock or make other distributions, prepay subordinated indebtedness and engage in mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations, in each case except as expressly permitted under the Credit Facility. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants. A majority of the Company’s assets serve as collateral under the Credit Facility.

All debt issuance costs are being amortized from the date incurred to the expiration date of the Credit Facility.

The aggregate maturities of long-term debt at June 30, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):

The Company periodically uses derivative financial instruments as part of a strategy to manage exposure to market risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. The Company has entered into several floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of ~~$900.0~~$800.0 million which hedge a portion of the Company’s floating rate indebtedness. The swaps mature at various dates through 2026. The Company has designated the swaps as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains are recognized as assets while unrealized losses are recognized as liabilities. The interest rate swap agreements are highly correlated to the changes in interest rates to which the Company is exposed. Realized gains and losses in connection with each required interest payment are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss to interest expense. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

The effect of derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of operations and accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 ~~2018~~ and ~~2017~~2018 is as follows (in thousands):

	Interest Rate Swaps							Interest Rate Swaps
	2019			2018		2017		2020			2019			2018
Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income	$	(14,011	)	$	6,344	$	6,872	$	(26,915	)	$	(14,011	)	$	6,344
Amounts reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,903	)		1,129		7,715		2,635			(3,903	)		1,129
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(17,914	)	$	7,473	$	14,587	$	(24,280	)	$	(17,914	)	$	7,473

All of the Company’s leases are operating leases. The ~~aggregate maturities~~current portion of ~~long-term debt at June 30, 2019~~operating lease liabilities is included in other accrued expenses and current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Lease balances in our consolidated balance sheet are as follows (in thousands):

The Company’s total lease cost is recorded primarily within indirect costs and selling expenses and had the following impact on the consolidated statement of operations (in thousands):

The ~~Company conducts its operations from leased office facilities, all of which are classified as operating leases and expire over the next 11 years. Future~~Company’s future minimum lease payments ~~due~~ under non-cancelable operating leases at June 30, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):

The weighted-average remaining lease term (in years) and weighted-average discount rate was 6.27 years and 3.14 percent, respectively.

Cash paid for operating leases was $87.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2020. During the year ended June 30, 2020 operating lease liabilities arising from obtaining new ROU assets was $50.5 million, which includes all noncash changes arising from new or remeasured operating lease arrangements.

During April 2020, the Company entered into a lease agreement that will impact its financial statements starting in Q2 FY2021. Annual lease cost is expected to be approximately $6.0 million over a lease term of 12 years.

The Company’s future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases at June 30, 2019 are as follows (in thousands):

~~The minimum lease payments above are shown net of sublease rental income of $4.4 million scheduled to be received over the next four years under non-cancelable sublease agreements.~~

~~Rent expense incurred under operating leases for the years ended June 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017 totaled $79.0 million, $68.0 million, and $76.2 million, respectively.~~

	June 30,				June 30,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Deferred rent, net of current portion	$	41,427	$	32,768	$	—	$	41,427
Interest rate swap agreements		12,264		—		43,168		12,264
Deferred and contingent acquisition consideration		6,510		11,000		740		6,510
Deferred revenue		7,445		4,642		6,507		7,445
Deferred payroll taxes						40,594		—
Accrued post-retirement obligations		5,982		5,651		6,715		5,982
Long-term incentive compensation		13,085		11,935		—		13,085
Reserve for unrecognized tax benefits (see Note 19)		1,544		4,195
Reserve for unrecognized tax benefits						8,869		1,544
Transition tax		4,472		8,128		5,071		4,472
Other		15,203		6,868		17,040		15,203
Total other long-term liabilities	$	107,932	$	85,187	$	128,704	$	107,932

~~Deferred rent liabilities result from recording rent expense and incentives for tenant improvements on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective lease.~~

Accrued post-retirement obligations include projected liabilities for benefits the Company is obligated to provide under long-term care, group health, and executive life insurance plans, each of which is unfunded. Plan benefits are provided to certain current and former executives, their dependents and other eligible employees, as defined. Post-retirement obligations also include accrued benefits under supplemental retirement benefit plans covering certain executives. The expense recorded under these plans was ~~$0.4~~$1.2 million during the year ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and $0.4 million during the year ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The Company has entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements related to a portion of the Company’s floating rate indebtedness (see Note ~~14)~~15). See Note 2223 for fair values of the swap agreements as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

NOTE ~~17.~~18. BUSINESS ~~SEGMENT, CUSTOMER AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION~~SEGMENTS

The Company reports operating results and financial data in ~~two~~2 segments: domestic operations and international operations. Domestic operations provide information solutions and services to its customers. Its customers are primarily U.S. federal government agencies. Other customers of the Company’s domestic operations include commercial enterprises. The Company places employees in locations around the world in support of its customers. International operations offer services to both commercial and non-U.S. government customers primarily within the Company’s business systems and enterprise IT markets. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on net income. Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following tables.

	Domestic Operations		International Operations		Total		Domestic Operations		International Operations		Total
							(in thousands)
Year Ended June 30, 2020
Revenue from external customers							$	5,556,672	$	163,370	$	5,720,042
Net income								302,822		18,658		321,480
Net assets								2,482,283		179,027		2,661,310
Goodwill								3,279,856		127,254		3,407,110
Total long-term assets								4,297,885		158,701		4,456,586
Total assets								5,293,588		248,884		5,542,472
Capital expenditures								70,499		1,804		72,303
Depreciation and amortization								105,874		4,814		110,688
	(in thousands)
Year Ended June 30, 2019
Revenue from external customers	$	4,829,450	$	156,891	$	4,986,341	$	4,829,450	$	156,891	$	4,986,341
Net income		249,793		15,811		265,604		249,793		15,811		265,604
Net assets		2,206,109		165,357		2,371,466		2,206,109		165,357		2,371,466
Goodwill		3,224,685		111,394		3,336,079		3,224,685		111,394		3,336,079
Total long-term assets		3,927,783		127,540		4,055,323		3,927,783		127,540		4,055,323
Total assets		4,876,399		210,444		5,086,843		4,876,399		210,444		5,086,843
Capital expenditures		46,406		1,496		47,902		46,406		1,496		47,902
Depreciation and amortization		81,205		4,672		85,877		81,205		4,672		85,877

Year Ended June 30, 2018
Revenue from external customers	$	4,304,602	$	163,258	$	4,467,860	$	4,304,602	$	163,258	$	4,467,860
Net income		286,024		15,147		301,171		286,024		15,147		301,171
Net assets		1,948,768		158,119		2,106,887		1,948,768		158,119		2,106,887
Goodwill		2,514,520		106,315		2,620,835		2,514,520		106,315		2,620,835
Total long-term assets		2,975,620		127,395		3,103,015		2,975,620		127,395		3,103,015
Total assets		3,829,417		204,789		4,034,206		3,829,417		204,789		4,034,206
Capital expenditures		40,639		955		41,594		40,639		955		41,594
Depreciation and amortization		67,891		4,305		72,196		67,891		4,305		72,196

Year Ended June 30, 2017
Revenue from external customers	$	4,217,488	$	137,129	$	4,354,617
Net income		150,271		13,400		163,671
Net assets		1,652,736		140,985		1,793,721
Goodwill		2,479,496		97,939		2,577,435
Total long-term assets		2,912,488		118,692		3,031,180
Total assets		3,716,893		194,189		3,911,082
Capital expenditures		41,832		1,436		43,268
Depreciation and amortization		67,042		4,718		71,760

Interest income and interest expense are not presented above as the amounts attributable to the Company’s international operations are insignificant.

The Company earned 95.6 percent, 95.3 percent ~~94.8 percent~~ and ~~95.1~~94.8 percent of its revenue from various agencies and departments of the U.S. government for the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 ~~2018~~ and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively.

Payments to the Company on cost-plus-fee and T&M contracts are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and other government agencies that do not utilize DCAA’s services. The DCAA has completed audits of the Company’s annual incurred cost proposals ~~for fiscal years 2016 and 2017 and is nearing completion of the incurred cost proposal audits for~~through fiscal year 2018. We are still negotiating the results of prior years’ audits with the respective cognizant contracting officers and believe our reserves for such are adequate. In the opinion of management, adjustments that may result from these audits and the audits not yet started are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the Company has accrued its best estimate of potential disallowances. Additionally, the DCAA continually reviews the cost accounting and other practices of government contractors, including the Company. In the course of those reviews, cost accounting and other issues are identified, discussed and settled.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ~~(the “TCJA”)~~(TCJA) was enacted on December 22, 2017. Among other things, the TCJA reduced the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35.0 percent to 21.0 percent effective on January 1, 2018.

In the second quarter of FY2019 the Company completed its assessment for the income tax effects of the TCJA, including true-up to all provisional amounts previously recorded, within the allowed one-year measurement period provided for under Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 on December 22, 2018. During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized a $2.2 million tax benefit related to the reduction of our provisional calculation of the one-time transition tax liability and a $0.5 million tax benefit related to its final analysis of its deferred tax remeasurement.

The domestic and foreign components of income before provision for income taxes are as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended June 30,						Year Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2017		2020		2019		2018
Domestic	$	308,922	$	279,360	$	231,982	$	379,414	$	308,922	$	279,360
Foreign		18,987		19,304		16,637		22,223		18,987		19,304
Income before income taxes	$	327,909	$	298,664	$	248,619	$	401,637	$	327,909	$	298,664

	Year Ended June 30,									Year Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			2017			2020			2019			2018
Current:
Federal	$	41,675		$	56,467		$	54,425		$	42,268		$	41,675		$	56,467
State and local		17,606			13,006			11,334			14,744			17,606			13,006
Foreign		4,033			5,344			4,041			5,271			4,033			5,344
Total current		63,314			74,817			69,800			62,283			63,314			74,817
Deferred:
Federal		(27	)		(80,395	)		13,076			12,940			(27	)		(80,395	)
State and local		(877	)		3,481			2,917			5,465			(877	)		3,481
Foreign		(105	)		(410	)		(845	)		(531	)		(105	)		(410	)
Total deferred		(1,009	)		(77,324	)		15,148			17,874			(1,009	)		(77,324	)
Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	62,305		$	(2,507	)	$	84,948
Total income tax expense (benefit)										$	80,157		$	62,305		$	(2,507	)

Income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate as a result of the following (in thousands):

	Year Ended June 30,									Year Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			2017			2020			2019				2018
Expected tax expense computed at federal statutory rate (1)	$	68,861		$	83,805		$	87,017		$	84,344		$	68,861			$	83,805
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit		13,216			11,860			9,263			15,965			13,216				11,860
Nonincludible and nondeductible items, net		1,971			1,832			1,087			3,133			1,971		��		1,832
Remeasurement of deferred taxes and transition tax		(2,182	)		(86,593	)		—			—			(2,182	)			(86,593	)
Effect of foreign tax rates		(380	)		(1,261	)		(2,320	)		(377	)		(380	)			(1,261	)
R&D tax credit		(6,755	)		(3,630	)		(4,894	)
R&D tax credit, net											(10,700	)		(6,755	)			(3,630	)
Other tax credits		(2,138	)		(2,102	)		(1,321	)		(1,183	)		(2,138	)			(2,102	)
ASU 2016-09 share-based compensation		(7,493	)		(5,388	)		(1,390	)
Stock-based compensation											(10,900	)		(7,493	)			(5,388	)
Other		(2,795	)		(1,030	)		(2,494	)		(125	)		(2,795	)			(1,030	)
Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	62,305		$	(2,507	)	$	84,948
Total income tax expense (benefit)										$	80,157		$	62,305			$	(2,507	)

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred taxes are presented below (in thousands):

	June 30,						June 30,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred compensation and post-retirement obligations	$	29,206		$	27,842		$	33,094		$	29,206
Reserves and accruals		30,205			30,180			41,137			30,205
Stock-based compensation		9,881			7,793			9,860			9,881
Deferred rent		4,876			3,750
Interest rate swap		2,688			—
Lease liability								99,539			—
Interest rate swaps								11,349			2,688
Other asset								6,786			9,392
Total deferred tax assets		76,856			69,565			201,765			81,372
Deferred tax liabilities:
Goodwill and other intangible assets		(257,762	)		(238,020	)		(273,088	)		(257,762	)
Unbilled revenue		(17,640	)		(17,363	)		(17,429	)		(17,640	)
Prepaid expenses		(2,974	)		(3,991	)		(6,444	)		(2,974	)
Interest rate swap		—			(3,701	)
Other		(3,819	)		(7,370	)
Right of use assets								(85,275	)		—
Property and equipment								(32,625	)		(8,335	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(282,195	)		(270,445	)		(414,861	)		(286,711	)
Net deferred tax liability	$	(205,339	)	$	(200,880	)	$	(213,096	)	$	(205,339	)

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Tax statutes and regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to interpretation and require the application of significant judgment. The ~~Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through June 30, 2014 are no longer subject to audit. The~~ Company is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for year 2015; one state jurisdiction for years ~~2011~~2016 through ~~2017;~~2018; and one ~~foreign~~state jurisdiction for years ~~2011 through 2015.~~2016 and 2017. The Company does not expect the resolution of these examinations to have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

The effective income tax rate ~~for~~in FY2020, FY2019, ~~is higher than~~and FY2018, ~~primarily due to the favorable impact of the remeasurement of deferred taxes~~was 20.0 percent, 19.0 percent, and (0.8) percent, respectively. The effective income tax rate increased in ~~FY2018~~FY2020 primarily as a result of ~~the TCJA.~~pretax book income increasing more than favorable credits and permanent items. In ~~both periods,~~each period, the effective income tax rate was ~~also~~ favorably affected by excess tax benefits from employee ~~share-based~~stock-based payment awards ~~under ASU 2016-09,~~as well as a benefit from the research and development tax ~~credit, and gains from the change in value of assets invested in corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies.~~credit.

U.S. income taxes have not been provided for undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that have been permanently reinvested outside the United States. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the estimated deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings is approximately ~~$0.9~~$1.4 million.

The Company’s total liability for unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2020, 2019 ~~2018~~ and ~~2017~~2018 was approximately $8.8 million, $1.5 million and $4.1 million, ~~and $1.6 million,~~ respectively. ~~Of the unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, $1.5 million, $4.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively,~~Any amount, if recognized, would positively impact the Company’s effective tax rate. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized benefits is shown in the table below (in thousands):

	Year Ended June 30,								Year Ended June 30,
	2019			2018		2017			2020		2019			2018
Beginning of year	$	4,122		$	1,639	$	398		$	1,530	$	4,122		$	1,639
Additions based on current year tax positions		676			2,483		1,475			2,293		676			2,483
Lapse of statute of limitations		(164	)		—		(234	)		—		(164	)		—
Additions based on prior year tax positions										5,003		—			—
Reductions based on prior tax year positions		(3,104	)		—		—			—		(3,104	)		—
Settlement with taxing authorities		—			—		—
End of year	$	1,530		$	4,122	$	1,639		$	8,826	$	1,530		$	4,122

The Company recognizes net interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense. Over the next 12 months, the Company does not expect a significant increase or decrease in the unrecognized tax benefits recorded at June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the entire balance of unrecognized tax benefits is included in other long-term liabilities.

The Company maintains a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, the CACI $MART Plan (the 401(k) Plan). Employees can contribute up to 75 percent (subject to certain statutory limitations) of their total cash compensation. The Company provides matching contributions equal to 50 percent of the amount of salary deferral employees elect, up to 8 percent of each employee’s total calendar year cash compensation, as defined. The Company may also make discretionary profit sharing contributions to the 401(k) Plan. Employee contributions vest immediately. Employer contributions vest in full after three- years of employment. Total 401(k) Plan Company contribution expense for the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ were $46.9 million, $35.0 million, ~~$27.1 million,~~ and ~~$24.0~~$27.1 million, respectively.

The Company maintains several qualified 401(k) profit-sharing plans (PSP) that cover eligible employees. Employees are eligible to participate in the PSP beginning on the first of the month following the start of employment and attainment of age 18. Under the PSP, the Company may make discretionary contributions based on a percentage of the total compensation of all eligible participants. Company contribution expense for the year ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ was $41.8 million, $32.0 million ~~$26.3 million~~ and ~~$22.8~~$26.3 million, respectively.

The Company maintains the Supplemental Savings Plan through which, on a calendar year basis, officers at the director level and above can elect to defer for contribution to the Supplemental Savings Plan up to 50 percent of their base compensation and up to 100 percent of their bonuses. The Company provides a contribution of 5 percent of compensation for each participant’s compensation that exceeds the limit as set forth in IRC 401(a)(17) (currently ~~$280,000~~$285,000 per year). The Company also has the option to make annual discretionary contributions. Company contributions vest five-years from the date of enrollment, and vesting is accelerated in the event of a change of control of the Company. Participant deferrals and Company contributions will be credited with the rate of return based on the investment options and asset allocations selected by the Participant. Participants may change their asset allocation as often as daily, if they so choose. A Rabbi Trust has been established to hold and provide a measure of security for the investments that finance benefit payments. Distributions from the Supplemental Savings Plan are made upon retirement, termination, death, or total disability. The Supplemental Savings Plan also allows for in-service distributions.

Supplemental Savings Plan obligations due to participants totaled ~~$98.9~~$110.7 million at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, of which ~~$6.7~~$7.7 million is included in accrued compensation and benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Supplemental Savings Plan obligations increased by ~~$5.0~~$11.8 million during the year ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, consisting of ~~$4.8~~$4.9 million of investment gains, ~~$10.3~~$14.1 million of participant compensation deferrals, and ~~$1.6~~$1.5 million of Company contributions, offset by ~~$11.7~~$8.7 million of distributions.

The Company maintains COLI assets in a Rabbi Trust to offset the obligations under the Supplemental Savings Plan. The value of the COLI in the Rabbi Trust was $96.4 million at June 30, 2020 and COLI gains were $4.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2020. The value of the COLI in the Rabbi Trust was $92.7 million at June 30, 2019 and COLI gains were $4.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. ~~The value of the COLI in the Rabbi Trust was $91.5 million at June 30, 2018 and COLI gains were $3.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2018.~~

Contribution expense for the Supplemental Savings Plan during the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ was $1.9 million, $1.6 million, and $1.2 million, ~~and $0.7 million,~~ respectively.

Historically, the Company grants stock options, SSARs, non-performance-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs to key employees. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis ratably over the respective vesting periods. Performance-based RSUs are subject to achievement of a performance metric in addition to grantee service. Stock-based compensation expense for performance-based RSUs is recognized on an accelerated basis by treating each vesting tranche as if it was a separate grant. A summary of the components of stock-based compensation expense recognized during the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019, ~~2018,~~ and ~~2017,~~2018, together with the income tax benefits realized, is as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended June 30,						Year Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2017		2020		2019		2018
Stock-based compensation included in indirect costs and selling expense:
Restricted stock and RSU expense	$	25,272	$	23,628	$	21,945	$	29,302	$	25,272	$	23,628
Income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation	$	4,865	$	7,769	$	7,498	$	5,849	$	4,865	$	7,769

The Company recognizes the effect of expected forfeitures of equity grants by estimating an expected forfeiture rate for grants of equity instruments. Amounts recognized for expected forfeitures are subsequently adjusted periodically and at major vesting dates to reflect actual forfeitures.

The incremental income tax benefits realized upon the exercise or vesting of equity instruments are reported as operating cash flows. During the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019, ~~2018,~~ and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recognized $13.5 million, $9.2 million, ~~$6.3 million,~~ and ~~$1.6~~$6.3 million of excess tax benefits, respectively, which have been reported as operating cash inflows in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.

Under the terms of its 2016 Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2016 Plan), the Company may issue, among others, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, SSARs, and performance awards, collectively referred to herein as equity instruments. The 2016 Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders in November 2016 and amended and restated the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan) which was due to expire at the end of the ten-year period. Grants that were made under the 2006 Plan, and equity instruments granted prior to approval of the 2016 Plan continue to be governed by the terms of the 2006 Plan. During the periods presented all equity instrument grants were made in the form of RSUs.

Annual grants under the 2016 Plan and the 2006 Plan are generally made to the Company’s key employees during the first quarter of the Company’s fiscal year and to members of the Company’s Board of Directors during the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal year. With the approval of its Chief Executive Officer, the Company also issues equity instruments to strategic new hires and to employees who have demonstrated superior performance.

Upon the vesting of restricted shares and RSUs, the Company fulfills its obligations under the equity instrument agreements by either issuing new shares of authorized common stock or by issuing shares from treasury. The total number of shares authorized by shareholders for grants under the 2016 Plan and its predecessor plan was 1,200,000 plus any forfeitures from the 2006 Plan. The aggregate number of grants that may be made may exceed this approved amount as forfeited restricted stock and RSUs become available for future grants. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, cumulative grants of ~~592,888~~864,430 equity instruments underlying the shares authorized have been awarded, and ~~138,183~~187,711 of these instruments have been forfeited.

The Company granted performance-based stock awards to key employees in October of 2019 and 2018 and September of ~~2017 and 2016.~~2017. The final number of RSUs that are earned by participants and vest is based on the achievement of a specified EPS for the fiscal year and on the average share price for the 90-day period ended for the following three years. If the 90-day average share price of the Company’s stock in years one, two and three exceeds the 90-day average share price at the grant date by 100 percent or more the number of shares ultimately awarded could range up to 200 percent of the specified target award. In addition to the performance and market conditions, there is a service vesting condition that stipulates 50 percent of the award will vest 3 years from the grant date and 50 percent will vest approximately 4 years from the grant date, depending on the award date.

The annual performance-based awards granted for each of the fiscal years presented were as follows:

	Performance-based stock awards granted		Number of additional shares earned under performance-based stock awards		Performance-based stock awards granted		Number of additional shares earned under performance-based stock awards
Fiscal year 2020						108,844		—
Fiscal year 2019		129,108		—		129,108		5,874
Fiscal year 2018		185,056		20,116		185,056		51,808
Fiscal year 2017		193,420		73,065

We account for ~~share-based~~stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock awards and purchases under employee stock purchase plans, in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which requires that ~~share-based~~stock-based payments (to the extent they are compensatory) be recognized in our consolidated statements of operations based on their fair values. The fair value of RSU grants are determined based on the Company’s common stock closing price on the date of grant. The fair value of RSUs with market-based vesting features is also measured on the grant date but uses a binomial lattice model.

We determine the fair value of our market-based and performance-based RSUs at the date of grant using generally accepted valuation techniques and the closing market price of our stock. The fair value for the annual grant made in October ~~2018~~2019 was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model incorporating the following factors: 90-day average stock price at the grant date of ~~$184.96~~$216.02 a share, risk free rate of return of ~~2.88~~1.50 percent and expected volatility of ~~27.76~~24.54 percent. Stock-based compensation cost is recognized as expense on an accelerated basis over the requisite service period for performance-based awards. The weighted-average fair value of RSUs granted during the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018, was $252.25, $201.27, and ~~2017, was $201.27,~~ $146.27, ~~and $104.45,~~ respectively.

The Company also issues equity instruments in the form of RSUs under its Management Stock Purchase Plan (MSPP) and Director Stock Purchase Plan (DSPP). In addition, annual grants are made to members of the Company’s Board of Directors in the form of a set dollar value of RSUs. Grants to members of the Board of Directors vest based on the passage of time and continued service as a Director of the Company.

Restricted shares and most non-performance-based RSUs vest in full three years from the date of grant. RSUs granted to the Company’s Chief ~~Operating~~Executive Officer in February 2012 have longer vesting periods.

Changes in the number of unvested restricted stock and RSUs during each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2020, 2019, ~~2018,~~ and ~~2017,~~2018, together with the corresponding weighted-average fair values, are as follows:

	Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units					Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at June 30, 2016		873,854		$	64.79
Granted		256,853			104.45
Vested		(233,296	)		65.07
Forfeited		(62,804	)		93.12
Unvested at June 30, 2017		834,607		$	71.20		834,607		$	71.20
Granted		276,871			146.27		276,871			146.27
Vested		(394,293	)		66.29		(394,293	)		66.29
Forfeited		(53,198	)		95.03		(53,198	)		95.03
Unvested at June 30, 2018		663,987		$	107.96		663,987		$	107.96
Granted		274,261			201.27		274,261			201.27
Vested		(276,626	)		61.85		(276,626	)		61.85
Forfeited		(32,816	)		123.55		(32,816	)		123.55
Unvested at June 30, 2019		628,806		$	134.10		628,806		$	134.10
Granted							271,542			252.25
Vested							(348,897	)		77.33
Forfeited							(49,528	)		181.89
Unvested at June 30, 2020							501,923		$	173.18

The total intrinsic value of RSUs that vested during the years ended June 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ was $79.6 million, $53.0 million ~~$55.2 million~~ and ~~$26.6~~$55.2 million, respectively, and the income tax benefit realized was $15.9 million, $10.2 million and $13.3 million, ~~and $4.8 million,~~ respectively.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, there was no0 unrecognized compensation cost related to SSARs and stock options and ~~$42.0~~$40.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock and RSUs scheduled to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.

The Company adopted the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), MSPP and DSPP in November 2002, and implemented these plans beginning July 1, 2003. There are ~~1,250,000,~~1,500,000, 500,000, and 75,000 shares authorized for grants under the ESPP, MSPP and DSPP, respectively.

The ESPP allows eligible full-time employees to purchase shares of common stock at 95 percent of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the last day of the quarter. The maximum number of shares that an eligible employee can purchase during any quarter is equal to two times an amount determined as follows: 20 percent of such employee’s compensation over the quarter, divided by 95 percent of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the last day of the quarter. The ESPP is a qualified plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and, for financial reporting purposes, was amended effective July 1, 2005 so as to be considered non-compensatory. Accordingly, there is no stock-based compensation expense associated with shares acquired under the ESPP. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, participants have purchased ~~1,183,510~~1,217,404 shares under the ESPP, at a weighted-average price per share of ~~$57.18.~~$61.49. Of these shares, ~~34,186~~33,894 were purchased by employees at a weighted-average price per share of ~~$159.30~~$211.97 during the year ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. During the year ended June 30, 2013, the Company established a 10b5-1 plan to facilitate the open market purchase of shares of Company stock to satisfy its obligations under the ESPP.

The MSPP provides those senior executives with stock holding requirements a mechanism to receive RSUs in lieu of up to 100 percent of their annual bonus. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 2019, ~~2018,~~ and ~~2017,~~2018, RSUs awarded in lieu of bonuses earned were granted at 85 percent of the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of the award, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange. RSUs granted under the MSPP vest at the earlier of 1) three-years from the grant date, 2) upon a change of control of the Company, 3) upon a participant’s retirement at or after age 65, or 4) upon a participant’s death or permanent disability. Vested RSUs are settled in shares of common stock. The Company recognizes the value of the discount applied to RSUs granted under the MSPP as stock compensation expense ratably over the three-year vesting period.

Activity related to the MSPP during the year ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 is as follows:

	MSPP			MSPP
RSUs outstanding, June 30, 2018		3,938
RSUs outstanding, June 30, 2019					2,921
Granted		1,560			1,805
Issued		(691	)		(2,473	)
Forfeited		(1,886	)		(30	)
RSUs outstanding, June 30, 2019		2,921
RSUs outstanding, June 30, 2020					2,223
Weighted average grant date fair value as adjusted for the applicable discount	$	125.82		$	159.36

The DSPP allows directors to elect to receive RSUs at the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the award in lieu of up to 100 percent of their annual retainer fees. Vested RSUs are settled in shares of common stock. There were no0 DSPP awards outstanding during the year ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in an orderly transaction. The market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability is known as the principal market. When no principal market exists, the most advantageous market is used. This is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the price that maximizes the amount that would be received or minimizes the amount that would be paid. Fair value is based on assumptions market participants would make in pricing the asset or liability. Generally, fair value is based on observable quoted market prices or derived from observable market data when such market prices or data are available. When such prices or inputs are not available, the reporting entity should use valuation models.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized based on the priority of the inputs used to measure fair value. The inputs used in measuring fair value are categorized into three levels, as follows:

The Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value included interest rate swap agreements and contingent consideration in connection with business combinations. The following table summarizes the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, and the level they fall within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

			As of June 30,						As of June 30,
	Financial Statement	Fair Value	2019		2018		Financial Statement	Fair Value	2020		2019
Description of Financial Instrument	Classification	Hierarchy	Fair Value				Classification	Hierarchy	Fair Value
Contingent consideration	Other accrued expenses and current liabilities	Level 3	$	12,000	$	693	Other accrued expenses and current liabilities	Level 3	$	—	$	12,000
Contingent consideration	Other long-term liabilities	Level 3	$	—	$	11,000
Interest rate swap agreements	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	Level 2	$	—	$	672	Other long-term assets	Level 2	$	—	$	2,081
Interest rate swap agreements	Other long-term assets	Level 2	$	2,081	$	13,405	Other accrued expenses and current liabilities	Level 2	$	—	$	43
Interest rate swap agreements	Other accrued expenses and current liabilities	Level 2	$	43	$	—	Other long-term liabilities	Level 2	$	43,168	$	12,264
Interest rate swap agreements	Other long-term liabilities	Level 2	$	12,264	$	—

The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage its interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

Various acquisitions ~~completed during prior fiscal years (see Note 4)~~ contained provisions requiring that the Company pay contingent consideration in the event that the acquired businesses achieved certain specified earnings ~~results during the two and three year periods subsequent to each acquisition.~~results. The Company determined the fair value of the contingent consideration as of each acquisition date using a valuation model which included the evaluation of the most likely outcome and the application of an appropriate discount rate. At the end of each reporting period, the fair value of the contingent consideration was remeasured and any changes were recorded in indirect costs and selling expenses. During the years ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, this remeasurement resulted in a ~~$1.0~~$3.0 million and ~~$9 thousand~~$1.0 million net increase to the liability recorded, respectively.The remaining contingent consideration was settled during Q3 FY2020.

Earnings per share and the weighted-average number of diluted shares are computed as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	Year Ended June 30,						Year Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2017		2020		2019		2018
Net income	$	265,604	$	301,171	$	163,671	$	321,480	$	265,604	$	301,171
Weighted-average number of basic shares outstanding during the period		24,833		24,616		24,401		25,031		24,833		24,616
Dilutive effect of RSUs after application of treasury stock method		562		639		668		454		562		639
Weighted-average number of diluted shares outstanding during the period		25,395		25,255		25,069		25,485		25,395		25,255
Basic earnings per share	$	10.70	$	12.23	$	6.71	$	12.84	$	10.70	$	12.23
Diluted earnings per share	$	10.46	$	11.93	$	6.53	$	12.61	$	10.46	$	11.93

~~The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended June 30, 2019 includes the shares underlying the performance-based RSUs granted in October 2018, September 2017 and September 2016.~~

This data is unaudited, but in the opinion of management, includes and reflects all adjustments that are normal and recurring in nature, and necessary, for a fair presentation of the selected data for these interim periods. Quarterly condensed financial operating results of the Company for the years ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, are presented below (in thousands except per share data).

	Year Ended June 30, 2019								Year Ended June 30, 2020
	First		Second		Third		Fourth		First		Second		Third		Fourth
Revenue	$	1,165,864	$	1,181,641	$	1,264,958	$	1,373,878	$	1,363,392	$	1,395,469	$	1,465,600	$	1,495,581
Income from operations	$	99,600	$	102,263	$	94,908	$	81,096	$	100,157	$	110,187	$	113,676	$	133,676
Net income	$	78,833	$	68,596	$	68,145	$	50,030	$	67,977	$	79,195	$	80,577	$	93,731
Basic earnings per share	$	3.19	$	2.76	$	2.74	$	2.01	$	2.73	$	3.16	$	3.21	$	3.74
Diluted earnings per share	$	3.10	$	2.71	$	2.69	$	1.96	$	2.66	$	3.11	$	3.16	$	3.68
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic		24,737		24,856		24,866		24,875		24,894		25,065		25,078		25,089
Diluted		25,424		25,338		25,348		25,472		25,532		25,435		25,478		25,496

	Year Ended June 30, 2018								Year Ended June 30, 2019
	First		Second (1)		Third		Fourth		First		Second		Third		Fourth
Revenue	$	1,085,814	$	1,087,860	$	1,124,100	$	1,170,086	$	1,165,864	$	1,181,641	$	1,264,958	$	1,373,878
Income from operations	$	67,304	$	88,262	$	104,794	$	80,340	$	99,600	$	102,263	$	94,908	$	81,096
Net income attributable to CACI	$	42,046	$	142,795	$	64,499	$	51,831
Net income									$	78,833	$	68,596	$	68,145	$	50,030
Basic earnings per share	$	1.72	$	5.80	$	2.62	$	2.10	$	3.19	$	2.76	$	2.74	$	2.01
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.67	$	5.66	$	2.56	$	2.05	$	3.10	$	2.71	$	2.69	$	1.96
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic		24,487		24,622		24,656		24,700		24,737		24,856		24,866		24,875
Diluted		25,243		25,211		25,234		25,331		25,424		25,338		25,348		25,472

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized, on the 2114^stth day of August ~~2019.~~2020.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in capacities and on the dates indicated.

PART I

Item 1.	Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	128
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	2017
Item 2.	Properties	2117
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	2117
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	2319

PART II

Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	2420
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	2622
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations	2622
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	3231
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	32
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	3332
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	3332

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	3533
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	3533
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	3533
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	3533
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	3533

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	3634

SIGNATURES		7874

Exhibit No.	Description	Filed with this Form 10-K	Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.	Description	Filed with this Form 10-K	Form	Filing Date	Exhibit No.
10.25	Amendment dated May 21, 2015 to the Credit Agreement dated October 21, 2010, between CACI International Inc, Bank of America, N.A. and a consortium of participating banks.		8-K	May 27, 2015	10.8

10.26	Eighth Amendment dated January 29, 2016 to the Credit Agreement dated October 21, 2010, between CACI International Inc, Bank of America, N.A. and a consortium of participating banks.		8-K	February 3, 2016	10.9

10.27	First Incremental Facility Amendment dated February 1, 2016 to the Credit Agreement dated October 21, 2010, between CACI International Inc, Bank of America, N.A. and a consortium of participating banks.		8-K	February 3, 2016	10.10

10.28	Form of Performance RSU Grant Agreement pursuant to the CACI International Inc 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. *		8-K	December 1, 2017	10.1

10.29	Ninth Amendment dated May 3, 2018 to the Credit Agreement, dated October 21, 2010, between CACI International Inc, Bank of America, N.A. and a consortium of participating banks.		8-K	May 9, 2018	10.1

10.30	Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement issued pursuant to the 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan. *		10-K	August 21, 2017	10.30

10.31	Form of RSU Grant Agreement pursuant to the CACI International Inc 2016 Incentive Compensation Plan. *		10-K	August 21, 2017	10.31

10.32	Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated June 3, 2019 between John S. Mengucci and CACI International Inc.	X

10.33	Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2019 between John S. Mengucci and CACI International Inc.	X

21.1	Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant.	X

23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.	X

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Commission.	X

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Commission.	X

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.	X

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.	X

Exhibit No.	Description	Filed with this Form 10-K	Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.	Description	Filed with this Form 10-K	Form	Filing Date	Exhibit No.
10.34	Severance Compensation Agreement dated June 16, 2008 between Gregory R. Bradford and CACI International Inc. *		10-K	August 27, 2008	10.23

10.35	Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated June 3, 2019 between John S. Mengucci and CACI International Inc. *		10-K	August 21, 2019	10.32

10.36	Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2019 between John S. Mengucci and CACI International Inc. *		10-K	August 21, 2019	10.33

21.1	Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant.	X

23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.	X

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Commission.	X

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Commission.	X

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.	X

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.	X

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

101.SCH	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document and contained in Exhibit 101)

/s/ John S. Mengucci		/s/ Thomas A. Mutryn
John S. Mengucci		Thomas A. Mutryn
President,		Executive Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer and Director		Chief Financial Officer

	Year Ended June 30,
	2019		2018
Revenue	$	5,271,872	$	4,822,318
Net income		275,630		289,143
Basic EPS		11.10		11.75
Diluted EPS		10.85		11.45


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock	CACI	New York Stock Exchange

Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 2019		8,309	$	172.92		1,183,510		66,490
May 2019		—		—		—		—
June 2019		—		—		—		—
Total		8,309	$	172.92		1,183,510



		Revenue recognition based on the percentage of completion method
Description of the Matter		As described in Notes 2 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company records revenue using the percentage of completion method based on costs incurred for applicable contracts. For those contracts, the Company estimates variable consideration (e.g., award or incentive fees) and the estimated costs at completion (EAC). Changes in variable consideration and contract EACs can occur over the contract performance period for a variety of reasons including changes in contract scope and schedule and technical issues that may affect the award or incentive fee earned and total costs at completion. Significant changes in estimates could have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations. Auditing revenue recognition based on the percentage of completion method involved subjective auditor judgment because the Company’s estimates include time and materials necessary to complete the contract and management’s expectation of award and incentive fees that will be earned. These estimates are based on management’s assessment of the current status of the contract as well as historical results.

	Year Ended June 30, 2019
	As Adjusted Under ASC 605		Effect of ASC 606			As Reported Under ASC 606
Revenue	$	4,975,846	$	10,495		$	4,986,341
Costs of revenue:
Direct costs		3,304,053		—			3,304,053
Indirect costs and selling expenses		1,220,317		(1,773	)		1,218,544
Depreciation and amortization		85,877		—			85,877
Total costs of revenue		4,610,247		(1,773	)		4,608,474
Income from operations		365,599		12,268			377,867
Interest expense and other, net		49,958		—			49,958
Income before taxes	$	315,641	$	12,268		$	327,909
Income tax expense		59,179		3,126			62,305
Net income	$	256,462	$	9,142		$	265,604
Basic earnings per share	$	10.33	$	0.37		$	10.70
Diluted earnings per share	$	10.10	$	0.36		$	10.46

Year ending June 30,
2021	$	46,920
2022		46,920
2023		46,920
2024		1,272,795
Principal amount of long-term debt		1,413,555
Less unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs		(9,116	)
Total long-term debt	$	1,404,439

	June 30,
	2020
Operating lease cost	$	86,039
Short-term and variable lease cost		14,777
Sublease income		(1,201	)
Total lease cost	$	99,615

Year ending June 30:
2021	$	78,302
2022		68,239
2023		62,529
2024		55,302
2025		47,430
Thereafter		106,067
Total undiscounted lease payments		417,869
Less: imputed interest		(40,640	)
Total discounted lease liabilities	$	377,229

		CACI International Inc
		Registrant


Date: August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020	By:	/s/ John S. Mengucci
		John S. Mengucci President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

Signatures	Title	Date

/s/ JOHN S. MENGUCCI John S. Mengucci	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ THOMAS A. MUTRYN Thomas A. Mutryn	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ CHRISTOPHER A. VOCI Christopher A. Voci	Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ DR. J. P. LONDON Dr. J. P. London	Chairman of the Board, Executive Chairman	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ MICHAEL A. DANIELS Michael A. Daniels	Director	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ SUSAN M. GORDON Susan M. Gordon	Director	August 14, 2020

/s/ WILLIAM L. JEWS William L. Jews	Director	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ GREGORY G. JOHNSON Adm Gregory G. Johnson, USN (Ret.)	Director	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ JAMES L. PAVITT James L. Pavitt	Director	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ DR. WARREN R. PHILLIPS Dr. Warren R. Phillips	Director	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ DEBORA A. PLUNKET Debora A. Plunket	Director	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ CHARLES P. REVOILE Charles P. Revoile	Director	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020

/s/ WILLIAM S. WALLACE Gen William S. Wallace, USA (Ret.)	Director	August ~~21, 2019~~14, 2020