☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: ~~(516) 767-6492~~(757) 627-9088

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive oﬃcers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Based on the closing sales price on June 30, ~~2019~~2022 of ~~$2.65~~$28.79 per share, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately ~~$225,311,000.~~$371,337,000.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock $.06 par value was ~~89,352,996~~13,718,169 on February ~~10, 2020.~~28, 2023.

Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. or incorporated by reference herein are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, as such, may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe the Company’s future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may”, “will”, “should”, “estimates”, “projects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “expects”, “intends”, “future”, and words of similar import, or the negative thereof. Factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to: (i) the ability of the Company to successfully integrate its business with Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. following the completion of the Transactions (as defined herein); (ii) the risk that shareholder litigation in connection with the Transactions may result in significant costs of defense, indemnification and liability; (iii) the ability and willingness of the Company’s tenants and other third parties to satisfy their obligations under their respective contractual arrangements with the Company; (iv) the loss or bankruptcy of the Company’s tenants; (v) the ability and willingness of the Company’s tenants to renew their leases with the Company upon expiration, the Company’s ability to re-lease its properties on the same or better terms in the event of nonrenewal or in the event the Company exercises its right to replace an existing tenant, and obligations the Company may incur in connection with the replacement of an existing tenant; (vi) financing risks, such as the Company’s inability to obtain new financing or refinancing on favorable terms as the result of market volatility or instability and increases in the Company’s borrowing costs as a result of changes in interest rates and other factors, including the phasing out of LIBOR; (vii) the impact of the Company’s leverage on operating performance; (viii) risks related to the market for retail space generally, including reductions in consumer spending, variability in retailer demand for leased space, adverse impact of e-commerce, ongoing consolidation in the retail sector and changes in economic conditions and consumer confidence; (ix) risks endemic to real estate and the real estate industry generally; (x) competitive risks; (xi) risks related to the geographic concentration of the Company’s properties in the Northeast; (xii) damage to the Company’s properties from catastrophic weather and other natural events, and the physical effects of climate change; (xiii) uninsured losses; (xiv) the Company’s ability and willingness to maintain its qualification as a REIT in light of economic, market, legal, tax and other considerations; and (xv) information technology security breaches. For further discussion of factors that could materially affect the outcome of forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” in this report and other documents that the Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.

Except for ongoing obligations to disclose material information as required by the federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. All of the above factors are difficult to predict, contain uncertainties that may materially affect the Company’s actual results and may be beyond the Company’s control. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Company’s management to predict all such factors or to assess the effects of each factor on the Company’s business. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company’s current expectations will be realized.

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that focuses ~~primarily~~ on ~~ownership, operation~~owning and ~~redevelopment of~~operating income producing retail properties with a primary focus on grocery-anchored shopping centers primarily in ~~high-density urban markets from Washington, D.C. to Boston.~~the Northeast. At December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, the Company owned ~~and managed~~ a portfolio of 5619 operating properties ~~(excluding properties “held for sale”)~~ totaling ~~8.3~~2.9 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”). The portfolio was ~~93.2%~~86.2% leased and ~~91.5%~~82.3% occupied at December 31, ~~2019.~~2022.

The Company, organized in 1984, has elected to be taxed as a ~~real estate investment trust (“REIT”)~~REIT under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To qualify as a REIT under those provisions, the Company must have a preponderant percentage of its assets invested in, and income derived from, real estate and related sources. The Company’s objectives are to provide to its ~~shareholders~~stockholders a professionally-managed real estate portfolio consisting primarily of grocery-anchored shopping centers ~~from Washington, D.C. to Boston,~~in the Northeast, which will provide substantial cash flow, currently and in the future, taking into account an acceptable modest risk profile, and which will present opportunities for additional growth in income and capital appreciation.

The Company, organized as a Maryland corporation, has established an umbrella partnership structure through the contribution of substantially all of its assets to Cedar Realty Trust Partnership L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), organized as a limited partnership under the laws of Delaware. The Company conducts substantially all of its business through the Operating Partnership. Prior to consummation of the Transactions described below, the Operating Partnership had limited partners other than the Company, but their limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership were canceled pursuant to the Merger Agreement, as described below. At December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, the Company owned a ~~99.4%~~100.0% general and limited partnership interest in, and was the sole general partner of, the Operating ~~Partnership.~~ Partnership and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WHLR (as defined herein).

On March 2, 2022, the Company announced that following its previously announced review of strategic alternatives, it had entered into definitive agreements for the sale of the Company and its assets in a series of related all-cash transactions. Specifically, on March 2, 2022, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into an asset purchase and sale agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with DRA Fund X-B LLC and KPR Centers LLC (together with their respective designees, the “Grocery-Anchored Purchasers”) for the sale of a portfolio of 33 grocery-anchored shopping centers for cash (the “Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale”). In addition, on March 2, 2022, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (“WHLR”) and certain of its affiliates pursuant to which, following closing of the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale, WHLR would acquire the balance of the Company’s shopping center assets by way of an all-cash merger transaction (the “Merger”).

The ~~limited partners’ interest in~~transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Merger Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Transactions”. The Transactions were unanimously approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and were approved by the Company’s common stockholders at a special meeting of stockholders held on May 27, 2022.

On July 7, 2022, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries completed the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and the East River Park and Senator Square redevelopment asset sales for total gross proceeds of approximately $879 million, including the assumed debt. There were no material relationships among the Company, the Grocery-Anchored Purchasers, or any of their respective affiliates. On August 22, 2022, the Company completed the Merger. Each outstanding share of common stock of the Company and outstanding common unit of the Operating Partnership ~~(0.6% at December 31, 2019) is represented~~held by ~~Operating Partnership Units (“OP Units”). The carrying amount of such interest is adjusted at~~persons other than the ~~end of each reporting period to an amount equal~~Company immediately prior to the ~~limited partners’ ownership percentage~~Merger were canceled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment of $9.48 per share or unit. As a result of the ~~Operating Partnership’s net equity. The 537,000 OP Units~~Merger, WHLR acquired all of the outstanding ~~at December 31, 2019 are economically equivalent to~~ shares of the ~~Company’s~~Company's common ~~stock.~~stock, which ceased to be publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"). The ~~holders~~Company's outstanding 7.25% Series B Preferred Stock and 6.50% Series C Preferred Stock remain outstanding and continue to trade on the NYSE. In addition, prior to consummation of ~~OP Units have~~ the ~~right to exchange their OP Units for~~Merger, the ~~same number~~Company's Board of Directors declared a special dividend on shares of the ~~Company’s~~Company's outstanding common stock ~~or,~~and OP Units of $19.52 per share, payable to holders of record of the Company's common stock and OP Units at the ~~Company’s option, for cash.~~close of business on August 19, 2022.

The Company derives substantially all of its revenues from rents and operating expense reimbursements received pursuant to long-term leases. The Company’s operating results therefore depend on the ability of its tenants to make the payments required by the terms of their leases. The Company focuses its investment activities on grocery-anchored shopping centers. The Company believes that, because of the need of consumers to purchase food and other staple goods and services generally available at such centers, its type of “necessities-based” properties should provide relatively stable revenue flows even during difficult economic times.

The Company, the Operating Partnership, their subsidiaries and affiliated partnerships are separate legal entities. For ease of reference, the terms “we”, “our”, “us”, “Company” and “Operating Partnership” (including their respective subsidiaries and affiliates) refer to the business and properties of all these entities, unless the context otherwise requires. The Company’s executive offices are located at 44 South Bayles Avenue, Port Washington, New York 11050-3765 (telephone 516-767-6492). The Company also maintains property management, construction management and/or leasing offices at several of its shopping-center properties. The Company’sinvestor relations website can be accessed under the "INVESTORS" tab at ~~www.cedarrealtytrust.com,~~www.whlr.us, where a copy of the Company’s Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) can be obtained free of charge. These SEC filings are added to the website as soon as reasonably practicable. ~~The Company’s Code of Ethics, corporate governance guidelines and committee charters are also available on the website.~~ Information on the website is not part of this Form 10-K.

The following ~~tables summarize~~table sets forth information ~~relating to~~regarding the ~~Company’s~~ten largest tenants in our operating portfolio based on annualized base rent as of December 31, ~~2019:~~2022:

~~(1) Giant Foods, Stop & Shop and Food Lion, and (2) Marshalls, Home Goods, and TJ Maxx (GLA of 30,000; annualized base rent of $315,000).~~

The following table sets forth information with respect to the lease expirations of our properties as of December 31, 2022:

The terms of the Company’s retail leases generally vary from tenancies at will to 25 years, excluding renewal options. Anchor tenant leases are typically for 10 to 25 years, with one or more renewal options available to the lessee upon expiration of the initial lease term. By contrast, smaller store leases are typically negotiated for five-year terms. The longer terms of major tenant leases serve to protect the Company against significant vacancies and to assure the presence of strong tenants which draw consumers to its centers. The shorter terms of smaller store leases allow the Company under appropriate circumstances to adjust rental rates periodically and, where possible, to upgrade or adjust the overall tenant mix.

Most leases contain provisions requiring tenants to pay their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance and certain operating costs. Some leases also provide that tenants pay percentage rent based upon sales volume generally in excess of certain negotiated minimums.

Excluding properties held for sale ~~or sold, Giant Food Stores, LLC, Stop & Shop, Inc.~~ and ~~Food Lion, LLC, each of which is owned by Ahold N.V., a Netherlands corporation,~~properties included in discontinued operations, there were no tenants that leased an aggregate of ~~approximately 11% of the Company’s GLA at December 31, 2019, and accounted for an aggregate of approximately 12% of the Company’s total revenues during 2019. No other tenant leased~~ more than 10% of GLA at December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, or ~~contributed~~accounted for an aggregate of more than 10% of the Company’s total revenues during ~~2019.~~2022.

The Company’s executive offices are located at ~~44 South Bayles Avenue, Port Washington, New York, pursuant~~2529 Virginia Beach Boulevard, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

All individuals that provide services to the Company are employees of WHLR and participate in WHLR's compensation, benefits, professional development and other programs.

Compliance with various governmental regulations has an impact on our business, including our capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position, which can be material. We incur costs to monitor and take actions to comply with governmental regulations that are applicable to our business, which include, among others, federal securities laws and regulations, applicable stock exchange requirements, REIT and other tax laws and regulations, environmental and health and safety laws and regulations, local zoning, usage and other regulations relating to real property, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. See “Item 1A – Risk Factors” for a ~~lease which expires in February 2021, subject~~discussion of material risks to us, including, to the extent material, to our competitive position, relating to governmental regulations, and see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” together with our consolidated financial statements, including the related notes included therein, for a ~~one year extension option.~~discussion of material information relevant to an assessment of our financial condition and results of operations, including, to the extent material, the effects that compliance with governmental regulations may have upon our capital expenditures and earnings.

The Company believes that competition for the acquisition and operation of grocery-anchored shopping centers is highly fragmented. It faces competition from institutional investors, public and private REITs, owner‑operators engaged in the acquisition, ownership, redevelopment and leasing of shopping centers, as well as from numerous local, regional and national real estate developers and owners in each of its markets. It also faces competition in leasing available space at its properties to prospective tenants. Competition for tenants varies depending upon the characteristics of each local market in which the Company owns and manages properties. The Company believes that the principal competitive factors in attracting tenants in its market are location, price and other lease terms, the presence of anchor tenants, the mix, quality and sales results of other tenants, and maintenance, appearance, access and traffic patterns of its properties.

Under various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or other contaminants at property owned, leased, managed or otherwise operated by such person, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, and for investigation and cleanup costs in connection with such contamination. The cost of investigation, remediation or removal of such substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such conditions, may adversely affect the owner’s, lessor’s or operator’s ability to sell or rent such property or to arrange financing using such property as collateral. In connection with the ownership, operation, redevelopment and management of real estate, the Company may potentially become liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as certain other related costs and liabilities, including governmental fines and injuries to persons and/or property. Generally, the Company’s tenants must comply with environmental laws and meet any remediation requirements. In addition, leases typically impose obligations on tenants to indemnify the Company from any compliance costs the Company may incur as a result of environmental conditions on the property caused by the tenant. However, if a lease does not require compliance and/or indemnification, or if a tenant fails to or cannot comply, the Company could be forced to pay these costs.

The Company believes that environmental studies conducted at the time of acquisition with respect to its properties did not reveal any material environmental liabilities for which the Company is responsible and that would have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or liquidity. However, no assurances can be given that existing environmental studies with respect to any of the properties reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner of or tenant at a property did not create a material environmental condition not known to the Company, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist at any one or more of its

properties. If a material environmental condition does in fact exist, it could have an adverse impact upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

AsSome of ~~December 31, 2019,~~our properties could be subject to potential natural or other disasters. In addition, we may acquire properties that are located in areas that are subject to natural disasters, such as earthquakes and droughts. Properties could also be affected by increases in the frequency or severity of tornadoes, hurricanes or other storms, whether such increases are caused by global climate changes or other factors. The occurrence of natural disasters or severe weather conditions can increase investment costs to repair or replace damaged properties, increase operating costs, increase future property insurance costs, and/or negatively impact the tenant demand for lease space. If insurance is unavailable to us, or is unavailable on acceptable terms, or if our insurance is not adequate to cover business interruption or losses from such events, our earnings, liquidity and/or capital resources could be adversely affected. While several of our properties are located in areas that have experienced hurricanes, tornadoes, severe rain storms or snow during the past three years, there has been no substantial damage or change in operations related to the weather events.

The Company depends on the proper functioning, availability and security of its information systems, including financial, data processing, communications and operating systems. Several information systems are software applications provided by third parties. Our business is at risk from and may be impacted by cybersecurity attacks, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our confidential data, and other electronic security breaches. Such cyber attacks can range from individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology systems to more sophisticated security threats. While we employ a number of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate these threats, there is no guarantee such efforts will be successful in preventing a cyber attack. A cybersecurity attack could compromise the confidential information of our employees, tenants and vendors. A successful attack could disrupt and otherwise adversely affect our business operations.

The Company has incorporated cybersecurity coverage in its insurance policies; however, there is no assurance that the insurance the Company ~~had 74 full-time employees~~maintains will cover all cybersecurity breaches or that policy limits will be sufficient to cover all related losses. The Company is not aware of any material information security breaches over the last three years.

The Company carries comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, business interruption and ~~one part-time employee.~~rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in its portfolio under an insurance policy, in addition to other coverages, such as trademark and pollution coverage that may be appropriate for certain of its properties. Additionally, the Company carries a directors’, officers’, entity and employment practices liability insurance policy that covers such claims made against the Company and its directors and officers. The Company believes ~~that~~the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate for its ~~relations with~~properties given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice; however, its ~~employees are good.~~insurance coverage may not be sufficient to fully cover its losses.

The following section sets forth ~~below are the risk factors~~material risks that ~~we believe are material to our investors. Each of these risk factors could~~may adversely affect our business ~~operating results and/or~~and financial ~~condition,~~performance. The following risks, as well as ~~adversely affect the value of our common stock and other securities. In addition to the following disclosures, please refer to~~ the other information ~~contained~~ in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the accompanying consolidated financial statements and ~~the~~ related ~~notes. This section contains forward-looking statements. You~~notes, should ~~refer to the explanation of the qualifications~~be considered in evaluating us and ~~limitation on forward-looking statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.~~

our business. These risk factors are not ~~exhaustive. We operate in a competitive~~exhaustive, and ~~rapidly changing environment. New risk factors~~new risks may emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may affect our business.time. Investors should also refer to our ~~quarterly reports~~Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and ~~current reports~~Current Reports on Form 8-K for future periods for material updates to ~~these risk factors.~~the risks below.

Our properties consist primarily of grocery-anchored shopping centers. Our performance therefore is linked to economic conditions in the market for retail space generally.

Our properties consist primarily of grocery-anchored shopping centers, and our performance therefore is linked to economic conditions in the market for retail space generally. This ~~also~~ means that we are subject to the risks that affect the retail environment generally, including the levels of consumer spending, the willingness of retailers to lease space in our shopping centers, tenant bankruptcies, the impact of e-commerce on the demand for retail space, ongoing consolidation in the retail sector, and changes in economic conditions and consumer confidence. A downturn in the U.S. economy and reduced consumer spending due to sustained levels of high inflation,

unemployment or other factors could (i) negatively impact our tenants’ ability to meet their lease obligations due to poor operating results, lack of liquidity or other reasons, and therefore decrease the revenue generated by our properties and/or the value of our ~~properties. Our~~properties, (ii) affect our ability to lease space and negotiate and maintain favorable rents, ~~could also be negatively impacted by the state of the U.S. economy. Moreover,~~and (iii) reduce the demand for leasing space in our shopping centers, ~~could also significantly decline during a significant downturn in the U.S. economy that~~which could result in a decline in our occupancy percentage and reduction in rental revenues. ~~Any sustained levels~~

Actual or perceived threats associated with epidemics, pandemics or other public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have had and could have in the future, a material adverse effect on our and our tenants’ businesses, financial condition, results of ~~high unemployment can~~operations, cash flow, liquidity and ability to satisfy debt service obligations.

Epidemics, pandemics or other public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, that impact economic and market conditions, and result in government measures taken to alleviate their impact, including mandatory business shutdowns and stay-at-home orders, have had and could have in the future a material adverse effect on our and our tenants’ businesses, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and ability to access capital markets and satisfy debt service obligations.

Our retail tenants depend on in-person interactions with their customers to generate unit-level profitability, and the COVID-19 pandemic and related governmental imposed restrictions decreased customer willingness to frequent our tenants’ businesses, which adversely affected their ability to maintain profitability and make timely rental payments to us under their leases or to otherwise seek lease modifications or to declare bankruptcy.

The conditions caused by the pandemic continue to be ~~expected~~unpredictable, including as a result of new variants and governmental responses or restrictions and changes in behavior as a result, which continue to ~~have a serious negative impact on consumer spending~~present risks and ~~sales by tenants at~~uncertainties with respect to our ~~shopping centers.~~and our tenants’ business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and ability to satisfy debt service obligations.

The geographic concentration of our properties in the ~~Washington, D.C. to Boston corridor~~Northeast exposes us to greater economic risks than if the distribution of our properties encompassed a broader region.

Our performance depends on the economic conditions in markets where our properties are geographically concentrated. Our properties are located largely in the ~~region that straddles the Washington, D.C. to Boston corridor,~~Northeast, which exposes us to greater economic risks than if our properties were more diversely located (in particular, 237 of our properties are located in Pennsylvania). Any adverse economic or real estate developments resulting from the regulatory environment, business climate, ~~fiscal problems~~weather or ~~weather~~other conditions in such regions could have an adverse impact on our ~~prospects.~~business.

Anchor tenants are crucial to the success of our retail properties and vacated anchor space directly and indirectly affects our rental revenues.

Our properties consist primarily of grocery-anchored shopping centers. Anchor tenants pay a significant portion of the total rents at a property and contribute to the success of other tenants by drawing large numbers of customers to a property. Vacated anchor space not only directly reduces rental revenues, but, if not re-tenanted with a tenant with comparable consumer attraction, could adversely affect the rest of the property primarily through the loss of customer drawing power. In addition, the economic condition of each of our markets may be dependent on one or more industries. An economic downturn in one of these industry sectors may result in an increase in tenant vacancies, which may harm our performance in the event that certain anchor tenants cease to occupy a property, such an action results in a significant number of other tenants having the contractual right to terminate their leases, or pay a reduced rent based on a percentage of the tenant's sales, at the affected ~~markets.~~property, which could adversely affect the future income from such property, also known as “co-tenancy.”

Our performance and value are subject to risks associated with real estate assets and with the real estate industry.

Our performance and value are subject to risks associated with real estate assets and with the real estate industry, including, among other things, risks related to adverse changes in national, regional and local economic and market conditions. Our continued ability to make expected distributions to our ~~shareholders~~stockholders depends on our ability to generate sufficient revenues to meet operating expenses, future debt service and capital expenditure requirements. Events and conditions generally applicable to owners and operators of real property that are beyond our control may decrease cash available for distribution and the value of our properties.

In the event of default by a tenant, we may experience delays in enforcing, as well as incur substantial costs to enforce, our rights as a landlord. In addition, costs associated with our operations, such as real estate and personal property taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments, generally are not reduced even as occupancy or rental rates decrease, tenants fail to pay base and additional rent or other circumstances cause a reduction in income. As a result, our financial performance, cash flow from operations and our ability to make distributions to our ~~shareholders~~stockholders may be adversely affected.

~~Our success depends on key personnel whose continued service is not guaranteed.~~

Our success depends on the efforts of key personnel, whose continued service is not guaranteed. Key personnel could be lost because we could not offer, among other things, competitive compensation programs. If one or more of our senior executives or key employees are unable to continue in their present positions or if their employment contracts are terminated or not renewed, we may not be able to replace them easily or at all. Competition for key personnel is intense, and such experienced individuals in our industry are in short supply. The loss of services of key personnel could materially and adversely affect our operations because of diminished relationships with lenders, sources of equity capital, construction companies, and existing and prospective tenants, and the ability to conduct our business and operations without material disruption.

~~The level of our indebtedness and any constraints on credit may impede our operating performance, and put us at a competitive disadvantage.~~

The level of our indebtedness may harm our business and operating results by (1) requiring us to use a substantial portion of our available liquidity to pay required debt service and/or repayments or establish additional reserves, which would reduce amounts available for distributions, (2) placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt or debt at more favorable terms, (3) making us more vulnerable to economic and industry downturns and reducing our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions, and (4) limiting our ability to borrow more money for operations or capital expenditures. In addition, increases in interest rates may impede our operating performance and put us at a competitive disadvantage. Further, payments of required debt service or amounts due at maturity, or creation of additional reserves under loan agreements, could adversely affect our liquidity. Our organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that we may incur, no do we have a policy limiting our debt to any particular level.

~~We may be adversely affected by changes in the~~ ~~London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)~~ ~~reporting practices~~

As of December 31, 2019, we had (1) approximately $156.0 million of variable-rate debt outstanding, which consists of our unsecured revolving credit facility and a term loan, and (2) $425.0 million of term loans for which the Company has interest rate swap agreements which convert the LIBOR rates to fixed rates. In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) that regulates LIBOR announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC") which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") as its preferred alternative to USD-LIBOR in derivatives and other financial contracts. We are not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be available or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR markets. Any changes adopted by the FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. If that were to occur, our interest payments could change. In addition,

~~uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in its current form.~~

~~As a relatively small public REIT, our general and administrative expenses constitute a larger percentage of our total revenues than many of our peers.~~

Our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $144.1 million. Because our company is smaller than many other publicly-traded REITs, our general and administrative expenses are, and will continue to be, a larger percentage of our total revenues than many other publicly-traded REITs. If we are unable to successfully execute on our strategy and grow our business, our general and administrative expenses will continue to have a greater effect on our financial performance and will reduce the amount of cash flow available to distribute to our shareholders.

Economic conditions in the U.S. economy in general, and any uncertainty in the credit markets and retail environment, could adversely affect our ability to continue to pay dividends or cause us to reduce the amount of our dividends.

We paid dividends totaling $0.20 per share during each of 2019, 2018 and 2017. However, any downturn in the state of the U.S. economy, weakness in capital markets and/or difficult retail environment may cause us to reduce or suspend the payment of dividends.

~~Any volatility or instability in the credit markets could adversely affect our ability to obtain new financing or to refinance existing indebtedness~~.

Any instability in the credit markets may negatively impact our ability to access debt financing, to arrange property‑specific financing or to refinance our existing debt as it matures on favorable terms or at all. As a result, we may be forced to seek potentially less attractive financings, including equity investments, on terms that may not be favorable to us. In doing so, we may be compelled to dilute the interests of existing shareholders that could also adversely reduce the trading price of our common stock.

~~We may be exposed to additional risks through our hedging activities, including the risks that a counterparty will not perform and that the hedge will not yield the economic benefits we anticipate.~~

To manage our exposure to variable interest rate risk, we use derivative instruments that involve risk, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, or that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. There can be no assurance that our hedging arrangements will qualify for hedge accounting or that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations. If we decide to terminate a hedging agreement, there could be significant costs and cash requirements involved to fulfill our obligations under the hedging agreement. Failure to effectively hedge against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations.

In addition, under the REIT qualification provisions of the Code, income we could receive from certain hedging transactions may be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit or entirely avoid otherwise advantageous hedging techniques.

As substantially all of our ~~revenues are~~revenue is derived from rental income, failure of tenants to pay rent or delays in arranging leases and occupancy at our properties could seriously harm our operating results and financial condition.

Substantially all of our ~~revenues are~~revenue is derived from rental income from our properties. ~~Our tenants may experience a downturn in their respective businesses and/or~~Downturns in the economy generally ~~at any time that~~or in our tenants’ business may weaken ~~their~~our tenants’ financial ~~condition. As a~~condition and result ~~any such tenants may delay~~in, among other things, delayed lease commencement, ~~fail~~failure to make rental payments when due, ~~decline to extend a lease~~non-extension of leases upon ~~its~~ expiration, ~~become insolvent,~~insolvency or ~~declare~~ bankruptcy. Any leasing delays, failure to make rental or other payments when due, or tenant bankruptcies, could result in the termination of tenants’ leases, which would have a negative impact on our operating results. In addition, adverse market and economic conditions and competition may impede our ability to renew leases or re-let space as leases expire, which could harm our business and operating results.

Our business may be seriously harmed if a major tenant fails to renew its lease(s) or vacates one or more properties and prevents us from re-leasing such premises by continuing to pay base rent for the balance of the lease terms. In addition, the loss of such a major tenant could result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants at the affected properties, as provided in their respective leases. Excluding properties held for sale ~~or sold,~~and properties included in discontinued operations, no tenant leased more than 10% of GLA at December 31, ~~2019~~2022 or contributed more than 10% of total revenues during 2019, except for Giant Food Stores, LLC, Stop & Shop, Inc. and Food Lion, LLC, each of which is owned by Ahold N.V., a Netherlands corporation, which leased an aggregate of approximately 11% of our GLA at December 31, 2019, and accounted for an aggregate of approximately 12% of our total revenues, during 2019.2022.

We may be restricted from re-leasing space based on existing exclusivity lease provisions with some of our tenants. In these cases, the leases contain provisions giving the tenant the exclusive right to sell particular types of merchandise or provide specific types of services within the particular retail center, which limits the ability of other tenants within that center to sell such merchandise or provide such services. When re-leasing space after a vacancy by one of such other tenants, such lease provisions may limit the number and types of prospective tenants for the vacant space. The failure to re-lease space or to re-lease space on satisfactory terms could harm operating results.

Any bankruptcy filings by, or relating to, one of our tenants or a lease guarantor would generally bar efforts by us to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant, or lease guarantor, unless we receive an order permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. A bankruptcy by a tenant or lease guarantor could delay efforts to collect past due balances, and could ultimately preclude full or, in fact, any collection of such sums. If a lease is affirmed by the tenant in bankruptcy, all pre-bankruptcy balances due under the lease must generally be paid in full. However, if a lease is disaffirmed by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have only an unsecured claim for damages, which would be paid normally only to the extent that funds are available, and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other members of the same class of unsecured creditors. In addition, we may be unable to replace the tenant at current rental rates. It is possible, and indeed likely, that we would recover substantially less than, or in fact no portion of, the full value of any unsecured claims we hold, and would be required to write off any straight-line rent receivable recorded for such tenant, which may in turn harm our financial condition.

~~Our development and redevelopment activities may not yield anticipated returns, which would harm our operating results and reduce funds available for distributions to shareholders.~~

~~We have limited experience in substantially developing and redeveloping properties in our markets. Development and redevelopment projects entail considerable risks, including:~~

In addition, the entitlement and development of real estate entails extensive approval processes, sometimes involving multiple regulatory jurisdictions. It is common for a project to require multiple approvals, permits and consents from U.S. federal, state and local governing and regulatory bodies. Compliance with these and other regulations and standards is time intensive and costly and may require additional long range infrastructure review and approvals which can add to project cost. In addition, development of properties containing delineated wetlands may require one or more permits from the U.S. federal government and/or state and local governmental agencies. Any of these issues can materially affect the cost, timing and economic viability of our development and redevelopment projects.

Moreover, properties we redevelop or acquire may fail to achieve the occupancy or rental rates we project, within the time frames we project, at the time we make the decision to invest, which may result in the properties’ failure to achieve the returns we projected. Our pre-acquisition evaluation of the physical condition of each new investment may not detect certain defects or identify necessary repairs until after the property is acquired, which could significantly increase our total acquisition costs or decrease cash flow from the property. In addition, our investigation of a property or building prior to our acquisition, and any representations we may receive from the seller of such building or property, may fail to reveal various liabilities, which could reduce the cash flow from the property or increase our acquisition cost.

At times, we may also be required to use unionized construction workers or to pay the prevailing wage in a jurisdiction to unionized workers. Due to the highly labor intensive and price competitive nature of the construction business, the cost of unionization and/or prevailing wage requirements for new developments or redevelopments could be substantial. Unionization and prevailing wage requirements could adversely affect a project’s profitability. In addition, union activity or a union workforce could

~~increase the risk of a strike, which would adversely affect our ability to meet our construction timetables, which could adversely affect our reputation and our results of operations.~~

Additionally, new real estate under development activities typically require substantial time and attention from management, and the time frame required for development, construction and lease-up of these properties could require several years to realize any significant cash return. The foregoing risks could cause the development of properties to hinder the Company’s growth and have an adverse effect on its results of operations and cash flows.

Developing and redeveloping properties will require significant capital investment, which may be funded through debt and equity financing, implementing a capital recycling strategy, entering into a joint venture arrangement with respect to one or more properties, or suspending or reducing distributions to our stockholders.

~~“New Technology”~~Technological developments may negatively impact our tenants and our business.

We may be adversely affected by developments in new technology, such as e-commerce, which may cause the business of certain of our tenants to become substantially diminished or functionally ~~obsolete, with the~~obsolete. As a result ~~that~~of such developments, our tenants may be unable to pay rent, become insolvent, file for bankruptcy protection, close their stores, or terminate their leases. ~~Examples~~The use of online shopping and

services platforms by consumers continues to gain in popularity and the ~~potentially adverse effects of~~migration toward new technology ~~on retail businesses include, among other things, the overall effects of e-commerce.~~commerce is expected to continue.

~~Recent annual increases~~Increases in online sales resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have also caused many retailers to sell products online on their websites with pick-ups at a store or warehouse or through deliveries, which may have the effect of decreasing the reported amount of their in-store sales and the amount of rent we are able to collect from them. With respect to grocer tenants, on-line grocery orders have become increasingly available, particularly in urban areas, but have not yet become a major factor affecting grocers in our portfolio. We cannot predict with certainty how growth in e-commerce, including same-day grocery delivery services, will impact the demand for space at our properties or how much revenue will be generated at “bricks and mortar” store locations in the future. If we are unable to anticipate and respond promptly to trends in retailer and consumer behavior, our occupancy levels and financial results could suffer.

Competition may impede our ability to renew leases or re‑let spaces as leases expire, as well as impede our further growth, which could harm our business and operating results.

We ~~also~~ face competition from ~~similar~~similarly positioned retail centers ~~within our respective trade areas~~ that may affect our ability to renew leases or re-let space as leases ~~expire.~~expire, as well as impede our further growth. Certain national retail chain bankruptcies and resulting store closings/lease disaffirmations have generally resulted in increased available retail space which, in turn, has resulted in increased competitive pressure to renew tenant leases upon expiration and to find new tenants for vacant space at such properties. In addition, any new competitive properties that are developed within the trade areas of our existing properties may result in increased competition for customer traffic and creditworthy tenants. Increased competition for tenants may require us to make tenant and/or capital improvements to properties beyond those that we would otherwise have planned to make. Any unbudgeted tenant and/or capital improvements we undertake may reduce cash that would otherwise be available for distributions to ~~shareholders. Ultimately,~~stockholders.

Additionally, competition from other well-capitalized real estate investors, including other REITs and institutional investment funds may operate to reduce the ~~extent we are unable to renew leases or re-let space as leases expire, our business and operations could be negatively impacted.~~

~~The financial covenants~~properties available for acquisition in our ~~loan agreements may restrict our operating or acquisition activities, which may harm our financial condition and operating results.~~

~~The financial covenants in our loan agreements may restrict our operating or acquisition activities, which may harm our financial condition and operating results. Our unsecured credit facilities and~~markets, reduce the ~~mortgages~~rate of return on our properties, ~~contain customary negative covenants, such as those that limit~~and interfere with our ability ~~without~~to attract and retain tenants. High barriers to entry in the ~~prior consent~~Northeast due to mature economies, road patterns, density of the lender, to sell or otherwise transfer any ownership interest, to further mortgage the applicable property, to enter into leases, or to discontinue insurance coverage. Our ability to borrow under our unsecured revolving credit facility is subject to compliance with these financial and other covenants, includingpopulation, restrictions on ~~the maximum availability, which is based on the adjusted net operating income~~development, and high land costs, coupled with large numbers of designated unencumbered properties, the payment of dividends, and overall restrictions on the amount of indebtedness we can incur. If we breach covenants in our debt agreements, the lenders could declare a default and requireoften overlapping government jurisdictions, may make it difficult for us to ~~repay the debt immediately and, if the debt is secured, take possession of the property or properties securing the loan.~~continue to grow in these areas.

Mortgage debt obligations could expose us to the possibility of foreclosure, which could result in the loss of our investment in a property or group of properties subject to mortgage debt.

If a property or group of properties is mortgaged to secure payment of debt and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the holder of the mortgage or lender could foreclose on the property, resulting in a loss of our investment. Alternatively, if we decide to sell assets in the current market to raise funds to repay matured debt, it is possible that these properties will be disposed of at a loss.

On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our held-for-use real estate assets and other investments may be impaired. Held-for-use real estate assets are impaired only if the estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property are less than the carrying value of the property. The estimate of cash flows considers factors such as expected future operating income, capital expenditures, trends and prospects, the effects of demand, tenant-operator performance, competition and other factors. If we are evaluating the potential sale of an asset or development alternatives, the future cash flow considerations include the most likely course of action at the balance sheet date based on current plans, intended holding periods and available market information including a market discount rate applied to the estimated future proceeds. We are required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of our real estate assets and other investments. These assessments have a direct impact on our earnings because recording an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to earnings. There can be no assurance that we will not take additional charges in the future related to the impairment of our assets. Any future impairment could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which the charge is taken.

We ~~intend to~~may sell properties and reinvest those proceeds in the acquisition of higher quality properties in our target markets, the development and redevelopment of our properties, or use the proceeds to pay down debt. While we hope to minimize the dilutive effect of these sales on our earnings, in the near term the returns on the disposed assets are likely to exceed the returns we are able to achieve through the reinvestment of those proceeds. Also, in the event we are unable to sell these assets for amounts equal to or in excess of their current carrying values, we would be required to recognize an impairment ~~charge.~~charge or loss. Any such impairment charges or earnings dilution could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows and the market price of our publicly traded securities.

~~Competition and saturation in our existing markets may limit our ability for further growth in these geographic regions.~~

Numerous commercial developers and real estate companies compete with us seeking properties for acquisition within our existing target markets. While we continue to evaluate the market for available properties, our ability to acquire properties on favorable terms is subject to a number of risks. We may be unable to acquire a desired property because of competition from other well-capitalized real estate investors, including other REITs and institutional investment funds. This competition may operate to reduce the properties available for acquisition in these markets, reduce the rate of return on these properties, and interfere with our ability to attract and retain tenants.

High barriers to entry in the Washington, D.C. to Boston corridor due to mature economies, road patterns, density of population, restrictions on development, and high land costs, coupled with large numbers of often overlapping government jurisdictions, may make it difficult for us to continue to grow in these areas.

~~Future acquisitions may result in disruptions to our business, may strain management resources and may result in earnings per share and shareholder dilution.~~

If we acquire a business involving multiple properties, we will be required to integrate the operations, personnel and accounting and information systems of the acquired business and train, retain and motivate any key personnel from the acquired business. In addition, acquisitions of or investments in companies may cause disruptions in our operations and divert management’s attention away from day-to-day operations, which could impair our relationships with our current tenants and employees. The issuance of equity or debt securities in connection with any acquisition or investment could be substantially dilutive to our shareholders.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in our portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions is limited. The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, supply and demand, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot be certain that we will be able to sell any property for the price and other terms we seek, or that any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot estimate with certainty the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to complete the sale of a property. We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. Factors that impede our ability to dispose of properties could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

~~Our~~We may be unable to integrate successfully with WHLR or realize expected synergies or other benefits of the Merger.

The successful integration of our business with WHLR has and will continue to require significant amounts of effort and resources. Despite our efforts, it is possible that the integration process could take longer than anticipated and/or could be ~~negatively affected by shareholder activism, which could impact~~more difficult than anticipated due to a number reason, including:

~~Any perceived uncertainties as to our future direction resulting from such shareholder activism or proxy contest~~For these reasons, it is possible that the integration process could result in the ~~loss~~distraction of ~~potential~~management, the disruption of the ongoing business, ~~opportunities, be exploited by our competitors, cause concern to our current~~ or ~~potential customers, and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, all~~inconsistencies in the combined operations, any of which could adversely affect the ability of the Company and/or WHLR to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger, or could otherwise adversely affect the business and financial results of the Company and/or WHLR.

The level of our ~~business. Furthermore, actions~~indebtedness and any constraints on credit may impede our operating performance, and put us at a competitive disadvantage.

The level of ~~activist shareholders~~our indebtedness may ~~cause~~harm our business and operating results by (1) requiring us to use a substantial portion of our available liquidity to pay required debt service and/or repayments or establish additional reserves, which would reduce amounts available for distributions, (2) placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt or debt at more favorable terms, (3) making us more vulnerable to economic and industry downturns and reducing our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions, and (4) limiting our ability to borrow more money for operations or capital expenditures. In addition, increases in interest rates may impede our operating performance and put us at a competitive disadvantage. Further, payments of required debt service or amounts due at maturity, or creation of additional reserves under loan agreements, could adversely affect our liquidity. Our organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that we may incur, nor do we have a policy limiting our debt to any particular level.

Any volatility or instability in the credit markets could adversely affect our ability to obtain new financing or to refinance existing indebtedness.

We may be exposed to additional risks through potential hedging activities, including the risks that a counterparty will not perform and that the hedge will not yield the economic benefits we anticipate.

To manage our exposure to variable interest rate risk, we may use derivative instruments that involve risk, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, or that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. There can be no assurance that hedging arrangements will qualify for hedge accounting or that hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations. If we decide to terminate a hedging agreement, there could be significant ~~fluctuations~~costs and cash requirements involved to fulfill our obligations under the hedging agreement. Failure to effectively hedge against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations.

The financial covenants in our ~~stock price~~loan agreements may restrict our operating or acquisition activities, which may harm our financial condition and operating results.

The financial covenants in our loan agreements may restrict our operating or acquisition activities, which may harm our financial condition and operating results. Our unsecured credit facilities and the mortgages on our properties contain customary negative covenants, such as those that limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to sell or otherwise transfer any ownership interest, to further mortgage the applicable property, to enter into leases, or to discontinue insurance coverage. Our ability to borrow under our unsecured revolving credit facility is subject to compliance with these financial and other covenants, including restrictions on the maximum availability, which is based on ~~temporary~~the adjusted net operating income of designated unencumbered properties, the payment of dividends, and overall restrictions on the amount of indebtedness we can incur. If we breach covenants in our debt agreements, the lenders could declare a default and require us to repay the debt immediately and, if the debt is secured, take possession of the property or ~~speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect~~properties securing the ~~underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.~~loan.

Natural disasters and severe weather conditions could have an adverse impact on our cash flow and operating results.

Some of our properties could be subject to potential natural or other disasters. In addition, we may acquire properties that are located in areas which are subject to natural disasters. Properties could also be affected by increases in the frequency or severity of hurricanes or other storms, ~~whether~~including any such increases ~~are~~ caused by global climate ~~changes or other factors.~~change. The occurrence of natural disasters or severe weather conditions can increase investment costs to repair or replace damaged properties, increase operating costs, increase future property insurance costs, and/or negatively impact the tenant demand for lease space. If insurance is unavailable to us, or is unavailable on acceptable terms, or if our insurance is not adequate to cover business interruption or losses from such events, our earnings, liquidity and/or capital resources could be adversely affected.

~~Property ownership through joint ventures could limit our control of those investments and reduce their expected return~~.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned two of our operating properties through consolidated joint ventures. Our joint ventures, and joint ventures we may enter into in the future, may involve risks not present with respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:

Potential losses may not be covered by insurance. We carry comprehensive liability, fire, flood, extended coverage and rental loss insurance under a blanket policy covering all of our properties. We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice. We do not carry insurance for losses related to war, nuclear accidents, and nuclear, biological and chemical occurrences from terrorist’s acts. Some of the insurance, such as those covering losses due to wind, floods and earthquakes, is subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be sufficient to cover losses. The availability of insurance coverage may decrease and the prices for

insurance may increase as a consequence of significant losses incurred by the insurance industry and other factors outside our control. As a result, we may be unable to renew or duplicate our current insurance coverage in adequate amounts or at reasonable prices. In addition, insurance companies may no longer offer coverage against certain types of losses, such as losses due to terrorist acts and toxic mold, or, if offered,

the expense of obtaining these types of insurance may not be justified. Additionally, certain tenants have termination rights in respect of certain casualties. If we receive casualty proceeds, we may not be able to reinvest such proceeds profitably or at all, and we may be forced to recognize taxable gain on the affected property. If we experience losses that are uninsured or that exceed policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. Tenants may not properly maintain their insurance policies or have the ability to pay the deductibles associated with such policies. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged.

Future terrorist attacks and shooting incidents could harm the demand for, and the value of, our properties.

Future terrorist attacks, such as the number of highly publicized terrorists acts and shootings that have occurred at domestic and international retail properties, could harm the demand for, and the value of, our properties. Terrorist attacks could directly impact the value of our properties through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs, and the availability of insurance for such acts may be limited or may be subject to substantial cost increases. If such an incident were to occur at one of our properties, we may be subject to significant liability claims. While we attempt to mitigate this risk through insurance coverage and the employment of third party security services where we feel conditions warrant, we cannot guarantee that losses would not exceed applicable insurance coverages, thereby adversely affecting our results of operations and our ability to meet our obligations, including distributions to our stockholders. To the extent that our tenants are impacted by future attacks, their ability to continue to honor obligations under their existing leases could be adversely affected.

We face risks relating to cybersecurity attacks, loss of confidential information and other business disruptions.

We rely extensively on computer systems to manage our business and process transactions. Our business is at risk from and may be impacted by, cybersecurity attacks, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our confidential data and other electronic security breaches. Such cyberattacks can range from individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology systems to more sophisticated security threats. While we employ a number of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate these threats including password protection, backup servers and annual penetration testing, there is no guarantee such efforts will be successful in preventing a cyberattack. Cybersecurity incidents, depending on their nature and scope, could potentially lead to the compromise of confidential information, improper use of our systems and networks, manipulation and destruction of data, system downtimes and operational disruptions, which in turn could adversely affect our reputation, competitiveness and results of operations. In the event a security breach or failure results in the disclosure of sensitive tenant or other third-party data, or the transmission of harmful/malicious code to third parties, we could be subject to liability or claims.

Furthermore, it is possible that our computer systems, including our back-up systems, could be subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, catastrophic events such as fires, hurricanes, earthquakes and tornadoes, and intentional and inadvertent acts and errors by our employees. Any material interruption in our computer systems or issues with the ongoing implementation of newly adopted IT solutions may have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations or on our ability to timely and accurately report the results of our operations.

We could incur significant costs related to government regulation and litigation over environmental matters and various other federal, state and local regulatory requirements.

All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations relating to hazardous materials, environmental protection and human health and safety. Accordingly, we or our tenants may be required to investigate and clean up certain hazardous or toxic substances released on properties we own or operate, and also may be required to pay other related costs. Our leases typically impose obligations on our tenants to indemnify us for any compliance costs we may incur as a result of environmental conditions on the property caused by the tenant. If a tenant fails to or is unable to comply, we could be forced to pay these costs. If not addressed, environmental conditions could impair our ability to sell or re-lease the affected properties in the future, result in lower sales prices or rent payments, and restrict our ability to borrow funds using the affected properties as collateral.

We could incur significant costs related to government regulations and litigation over environmental matters. Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or other contaminants at property owned, leased, managed or otherwise operated by such person, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, and for investigation, remediation and cleanup costs in connection with such contamination. The cost of investigation, remediation or removal of such substances may be substantial, and the

presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such conditions, may adversely affect the owner’s, lessor’s or operator’s ability to sell or rent such property or to arrange financing using such property as collateral. We may be liable without regard to whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the environmental contamination and with respect to properties we have acquired, whether the contamination occurred before or after the acquisition.

We believe environmental studies conducted at the time of acquisition with respect to all of our properties did not reveal any material environmental liabilities for which the Company is responsible, and we are unaware of any subsequent environmental matters that would have created a material liability. If one or more of our properties were not in compliance with federal, state and local laws, including environmental laws, we could be required to incur additional costs to bring the property into compliance. If we incur substantial costs to comply with such requirements, our business and operations could be adversely affected. If we fail to comply with such requirements, we might additionally incur governmental fines or private damage awards. There can be no assurance that existing requirements will not change or that future requirements will not require us to make significant unanticipated expenditures that will adversely impact our business and operations.

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”) could require us to take remedial steps with respect to our properties.

Our existing properties, as well as properties we may acquire, may be required to comply with Title III of the ADA. We may incur significant costs to comply with the ADA, as amended, and similar laws, which require that all public accommodations meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons, and with various other federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements.

We ~~face risks relating~~are subject to ~~cybersecurity attacks, loss~~shareholder litigation arising out of ~~confidential information~~the Merger with WHLR, which could result in significant costs of defense, indemnification and ~~other business disruptions.~~liability.

We ~~rely extensively on computer systems to manage~~and the members of our business and process transactions. Our business is at risk from and may be impacted by cybersecurity attacks, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to our confidential data and other electronic security breaches. Such cyber-attacks can range from individual attempts to gain unauthorized access to our information technology systems to more sophisticated security threats. While we employ a numberBoard of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate these threats including password protection, backup servers and annual penetration testing, there is no guarantee such efforts will be successful in preventing a cyber-attack. Cybersecurity incidents, depending on their nature and scope, could potentially leadDirectors prior to the ~~compromise of confidential information, improper use of our systems~~Merger were named as defendants in lawsuits brought by shareholders seeking remedies including compensatory damages, an injunction enjoining the Merger, compensatory damages and networks, manipulation and destruction of data, system downtimes and operational disruptions, which in turn could adversely affect our reputation, competitiveness and results of operations. In the eventattorneys' fees. If a

~~security breach~~ settlement or ~~failure results~~other resolution is not reached in the ~~disclosure~~pending lawsuits in a reasonable amount of ~~sensitive tenant or other third-party data, or the transmission of harmful/malicious code to third parties, we could be subject to liability or claims.~~

Furthermore, it is possible that our computer systems, including our back-up systems, could be subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, catastrophic events such as fires, hurricanes, earthquakes and tornadoes, and intentional and inadvertent acts and errors by our employees. If our computer systems cease to function properly or are damaged, we may have to make a significant investment to repair or replace them, and we may suffer interruptions in our operations in the interim. Any material interruption in our computer systems or issues with the ongoing implementation of newly adopted IT solutions may have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations or on our ability to timely and accurately report the results of our operations.

~~Future terrorist attacks and shooting incidents could harm the demand for, and the value of, our properties.~~

Future terrorist attacks, such as the number of highly publicized terrorists acts and shootings that have occurred at domestic and international retail properties, could harm the demand for, and the value of, our properties. Terrorist attacks could directly impact the value of our properties through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs, and the availability of insurance for such acts may be limited or may be subject to substantial cost increases. If such an incident were to occur at one of our properties,time, we may be subject to significant ~~liability claims. While we attempt~~costs related to ~~mitigate this risk through insurance coverage~~defense, indemnification and the employment of third party security services where we feel conditions warrant, we cannot guarantee that losses would not exceed applicable insurance coverages, thereby adversely affecting our results of operations and our ability to meet our obligations, including distributions to our shareholders. To the extent that our tenants are impacted by future attacks, their ability to continue to honor obligations under their existing leases could be adversely affected.liability.

We could be subject to litigation that may negatively impact our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time, we may be a defendant in lawsuits and regulatory proceedings relating to our business. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such litigation or proceedings. We could experience a negative impact to our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations due to an unfavorable outcome.

~~Changes in accounting standards may adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.~~

The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), in conjunction with the SEC, has several key projects on its agenda, some of which have already been adopted, that could impact how we currently account for our material transactions, including, but not limited to, lease accounting, revenue recognition, and other accounting pronouncements disclosed in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 below. New accounting standards or pronouncements that will become applicable to us, or changes in the interpretation of existing standards and pronouncements, could have a significant adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

If we fail to continue to qualify as a REIT, our distributions will not be deductible, and our income will be subject to taxation, thereby reducing earnings available for distribution.

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code. We believe that we are qualified to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes for our taxable year ended December 31, 2022, and we expect to continue to qualify as a REIT for future taxable years, but we cannot assure that we have qualified, or will remain qualified, as a REIT. The REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex and official interpretations of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT are limited. Certain aspects of our REIT qualification are beyond our control. For example, decreased revenues attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic may make it more difficult for us to meet the gross income tests. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in operating so that we can remain qualified as a REIT. At any time, new laws, interpretations or court decisions may change the U.S. federal income tax laws or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of our qualification as a REIT.

If we do not continue to qualify as a REIT and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, our distributions will not be deductible, and our income will be subject to taxation, reducing earnings available for distribution. ~~We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code.~~ A REIT will generally not be subject to U.S federal and substantially all state and local income taxation ~~on that portion of its income that qualifies as REIT taxable income,~~ to the extent that it distributes ~~at least 90% of~~ its REIT taxable income to its ~~shareholders~~stockholders and complies with certain other requirements. In addition, we would be subject to a 4% excise tax if we fail to distribute sufficient income to meet a minimum distribution test ~~based on~~that requires us to distribute in a calendar year at least the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain and 100% of our aggregate undistributed income from prior years. If we cease to qualify as a REIT, we will also be subject to state and local income taxes in certain of the jurisdictions in which our properties are located. In addition, tax laws would no longer require us to pay any distributions to our ~~shareholders.~~stockholders. Unless we are entitled to relief under specific

statutory provisions, we could not elect to be taxed as a REIT again for the four taxable years following the year during which we were disqualified. Even if we qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to certain state and local income and franchise taxes and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.

We intend to make distributions to ~~shareholders~~stockholders to comply with the requirements of the Code. However, differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash could require us to sell assets, borrow funds or pay a portion

of the dividend in common stock to meet the 90% distribution requirement of the Code. Certain assets generate substantial differences between taxable income and income recognized in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Such assets include, without limitation, operating real estate that was acquired through structures that may limit or completely eliminate the depreciation deduction that would otherwise be available for income tax purposes. As a result, the Code requirement to distribute a substantial portion of our otherwise net taxable income in order to maintain REIT status could cause us to (1) distribute amounts that could otherwise be used for future acquisitions, capital expenditures or repayment of debt, (2) borrow on unfavorable terms, (3) sell assets on unfavorable terms, or (4) if necessary, pay a portion of our common dividend in common stock. If we fail to obtain debt or equity capital in the future, it could limit our operations and our ability to grow, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of our common stock.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities and limit our growth opportunities.

In order to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, our sources of income, the nature of our investments in commercial real estate and related assets, the amounts we distribute to ~~shareholders~~stockholders and the ownership of our stock. We may also be required to make distributions to ~~shareholders~~stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

If our Operating Partnership was treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes prior to the Merger with WHLR, we would have ceased to qualify as a REIT.

We believe our Operating Partnership qualified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes from the time it began serving Cedar's operating partnership through the completion of the Merger with WHLR (The “Pre-Merger Partnership Period”), after which it became a disregarded entity for U.S federal income tax purposes. Assuming that it qualified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes during the Pre-Merger Partnership Period, our Operating Partnership generally would not have been subject to U.S. federal income tax on its income. Instead, its partners, including us, generally were required to pay tax on their respective allocable share of our operating partnership’s income. No assurance can be provided, however, that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) will not challenge our Operating Partnership’s status as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes during the Pre-Merger Partnership Period, or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. For example, our Operating Partnership would have been treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes if it had been deemed to be a “publicly traded partnership” and less than 90% of its income consisted of “qualifying income” under the Code. If the IRS were successful in treating our Operating Partnership as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes during the Pre-Merger Partnership Period, we would have failed to meet the gross income tests and certain of the asset tests applicable to REITs and, therefore, would have ceased to qualify as a REIT, and our Operating Partnership would become subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax for the applicable portion of the Pre-Merger Partnership Period.

Our property taxes could increase due to property tax rate changes or reassessment, which could impact our cash flow.

Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we are required to pay state and local property taxes on our properties. The property taxes on our properties may increase as property tax rates change or as our properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Therefore, the amount of property taxes we pay in the future may increase substantially from what we have paid in the past and such increases may not be covered by tenants pursuant to our lease agreements. If the property taxes we pay increase, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common stock and our ability to satisfy our principal and interest obligations and to make distributions to our stockholders may be negatively impacted.

Tax laws applicable to REITs generally require that we hold our properties for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forego or defer sales of properties that otherwise would be in our best interest. Therefore, we may be unable to adjust our portfolio mix promptly in response to market conditions, which may adversely affect our financial position.

To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. We may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our qualification as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% tax on any resultant gain if we sell assets that are treated as dealer property or inventory.

In addition, the sale of our properties may generate gains for tax purposes which, if not adequately deferred through “like kind exchanges” under Section 1031 of the Code or other tax deference strategies, could require us to pay income taxes or make additional distributions to our ~~shareholders,~~stockholders, thus reducing our capital available for investment in other properties, or if the proceeds of such sales are already invested in other properties, require us to obtain additional funds to pay such taxes or make such distributions, in either such case to permit us to maintain our status as a REIT.

The partnership audit rules may alter who bears the liability in the event any subsidiary partnership (such as our Operating Partnership) is audited and an adjustment is assessed.

In the case of an audit of a partnership for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, the partnership itself may be liable for a hypothetical increase in partner-level taxes (including interest and penalties) resulting from an adjustment of partnership tax items on audit, regardless of changes in the composition of the partners (or their relative ownership) between the year under audit and the year of the adjustment. Thus, for example, an audit assessment attributable to former partners of the Operating Partnership could be shifted to the partners in the year of the adjustment. The partnership audit rules also include an elective alternative method under which the additional taxes resulting from the adjustment are assessed from the affected partners (often referred to as a “push-out election”), subject to a higher rate of interest than otherwise would apply. The rules provide that when a push-out election causes a partner that is itself a partnership to be assessed with its share of such additional taxes from the adjustment, such partnership may cause such additional taxes to be pushed out to its own partners. In addition, applicable Treasury Regulations provide that a partnership may be able to request a modification of an adjustment that is based on deficiency dividends distributed by a partner that is a REIT. Many questions remain as to how the partnership audit rules will apply in practice, and it is not clear at this time what effect these rules will have on us. However, it is possible that a partnership in which we directly or indirectly invest may be subject to U.S. federal income tax, interest, and penalties in the event of a U.S. federal income tax audit as a result of these rules, and as a result could increase the U.S. federal income tax, interest, and/or penalties otherwise borne by us as a direct or indirect partner in any such partnership.

Failure to qualify as a domestically-controlled REIT could subject our non-U.S. ~~shareholders~~stockholders to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

We will be a domestically-controlled REIT if, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of ~~its~~our shares are held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. ~~shareholders.~~stockholders. Because our shares are publicly traded, we cannot guarantee that we will, in fact, be a domestically-controlled REIT. If we fail to qualify as a domestically-controlled REIT, our non-U.S. ~~shareholders~~stockholders (other than “qualified shareholders”, “qualified foreign pension funds” or “qualified controlled entities”) that otherwise would not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the gain attributable to a sale of our shares would be subject to taxation upon such a sale if either (a) the shares were not considered to be “regularly traded” under applicable Treasury regulations on an established securities market, such as the NYSE, or (b) the shares were considered to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market and the selling non-U.S. ~~shareholder~~stockholder owned, actually or constructively, more than 10% in value of the outstanding shares at any time during specified testing periods. If gain on the sale or exchange of our shares was subject to taxation for these reasons, the non-U.S. ~~shareholder~~stockholder would be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to any gain on a net basis in a manner similar to the taxation of a taxable U.S. ~~shareholder,~~stockholder, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals, and corporate non-U.S. ~~shareholders~~stockholders may be subject to an additional branch profits tax.

We may choose to make distributions in our own stock, in which case you may be required to pay income taxes without receiving any cash dividends.

In connection with our qualification as a REIT, we are required to annually distribute to our ~~shareholders~~stockholders dividends equal to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which does not equal net income, as calculated in accordance with GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gain. In order to satisfy this requirement, we may make distributions that are payable in cash and/or shares of our stock (which could account for up to 90% of the aggregate amount of such distributions) at the election of each ~~shareholder.~~stockholder. Taxable ~~shareholders~~stockholders receiving such distributions will be required to include the full amount of such distributions as ordinary dividend income to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S.

federal income tax purposes. As a result, U.S. ~~shareholders~~stockholders may be required to pay income taxes with respect to such distributions in excess of the cash portion of the distribution received. Accordingly, U.S. ~~shareholders~~stockholders receiving a distribution of our shares may be required to sell shares received in such distribution or may be required to sell other stock or assets owned by them, at a time that may be disadvantageous, in order to satisfy any tax imposed on such distribution. If a U.S. ~~shareholder~~stockholder sells the stock that it receives as part of the distribution in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount it must include in income with respect to the

distribution, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to certain non-U.S. ~~shareholders,~~stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such distribution, including in respect of all or a portion of such distribution that is payable in stock, by withholding or disposing of part of the shares included in such distribution and using the proceeds of such disposition to satisfy the withholding tax imposed. In addition, if a significant number of our ~~shareholders~~stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividend income, such sale may put downward pressure on the market price of our stock.

Various tax aspects of such a taxable cash/stock distribution are uncertain and have not yet been addressed by the ~~Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).~~IRS. No assurance can be given that the IRS will not impose requirements in the future with respect to taxable cash/stock distributions, including on a retroactive basis, or assert that the requirements for such taxable cash/stock distributions have not been met.

Generally, dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for reduced tax rates under the Code. For the calendar year ~~2018,~~2022, the maximum federal individual tax rate for nonqualified dividends payable is 37.0%; qualified dividends from most C corporations received by individuals are subject to a reduced maximum federal rate of 20%. In addition to these rates, certain high income individuals may be subject to an additional 3.8% tax on certain investment income, including dividends and capital gains. As a REIT, our distributions to individual ~~shareholders~~stockholders generally are not eligible for the reduced rates and are, consequently, taxed at ordinary income rates. Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, those U.S. ~~shareholders~~stockholders that are individuals, trusts or estates may deduct 20% of their dividends from REITs (excluding qualified dividend income and capital gains dividends). For those U.S. ~~shareholders~~stockholders in the top marginal tax bracket of 37%, the deduction for REIT dividends yields an effective income tax rate of 29.6% (exclusive of the net investment income tax) on REIT dividends. The more favorable federal tax rates applicable to regular corporate dividends may result in the stock of REITs being perceived to be less attractive than the stock of corporations that pay dividends qualifying for reduced rates of tax, which may adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs.

Changes to the federal, state and municipality tax laws could have a significant negative impact on the overall economy, our tenants, and our business.

At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws or regulations governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws or regulations may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation or interpretation may take effect retroactively. A shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in which we operate may lead to changes in state and municipalities tax laws. We and our ~~shareholders~~stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, regulation, or administrative interpretation.

In December 2017 the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) was signed into law. The provisions of the TCJA are far-reaching and generally applied to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, while many provisions, in particular those affecting individual taxpayers, expire at the end of 2025. As a result of the changes implemented by the TCJA, our taxable income and the amount of distributions to our shareholders required in order to maintain our REIT status, and our relative tax advantage as a REIT, may significantly change. As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our shareholders annually. Among other things, the TCJA:

The TCJA is a complex revision to the U.S. federal income tax laws with contrasting impacts on different categories of taxpayers and industries, and will require subsequent rulemaking and interpretation in a number of areas. The long-term impact of the TCJA on the overall economy and the real estate industry cannot be predicted at this early stage. Furthermore, the TCJA may negatively impact certain of our tenants’ operating results, financial condition, and future business plans. There can be no assurance that the TCJA will not negatively impact our operating results, financial condition, and future business operations.

~~Shareholders~~Stockholders are urged to consult with their own tax advisors with respect to ~~the impact that the TCJA and other legislation may have on their investment and~~ the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on their investment in our shares.

~~Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure~~RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE

~~Our charter and Maryland law contain provisions that~~We may ~~delay, defer or prevent a change of control transaction and depress our stock price.~~

Our charter and Maryland law contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control transaction and depress the price of our common stock. The charter, subject to certain exceptions, authorizes directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable relating to qualification as a REIT, and to limit any person to beneficial ownership of no more than 9.9% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. This ownership limit may delay or impede a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price forpay cash dividends on our common stock, ~~or otherwise be in~~subject to Maryland law.

If we are current on the ~~best interests~~payment of ~~shareholders. Our Board~~dividends to our holders of Directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt a proposed transferee from the ownership limit, but not grant an exemption from the ownership limit to any proposed transferee whose direct or indirect ownership could jeopardize our status as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if our Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as, or to be, a REIT. Our Board of Directors has waived the ownership limit to permit certain institutional investors to own common stock in excess of the ownership limit and may grant additional waivers in the future as long as the Company is able to maintain its REIT status. This concentration of ownership could deprive other shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares of common stock as part of a sale of our Company and ultimately might affect the market price of our common stock.

~~We may authorize and issue stock and OP Units without shareholder approval. Our charter authorizes the Board of Directors to issue additional shares of common or~~ preferred stock, to issue additional OP Units, to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock, and to set the preferences, rights and other terms of such classified or unclassified shares. We have agreed not to use our preferred stock for anti-takeover purposes or in connection with a shareholder rights plan unless we ~~obtain shareholder approval. Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”)~~ may ~~have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of~~pay cash dividends on our common stock, subject to compliance with ~~the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price~~Maryland law and any restrictions contained in our indebtedness. Payment of cash dividends on our common stock may divert cash from other uses, such ~~shares, including:~~

We have opted out of these provisions of the MGCL. However, the Board of Directors may, by resolution, elect to opt in to the business combination provisions of the MGCL, and we may, by amendment to our bylaws, opt in to the control share provisions of the MGCL.repaying outstanding debt.

~~Our ability to pay dividends is limited by the requirements of Maryland law.~~

Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is limited by the laws of the State of Maryland. Under applicable Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally may not make a distribution if, after giving effect to the distribution, the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or the value of the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus, unless the corporation’s charter provides otherwise, the amount that would be needed, if the corporation were dissolved at the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of ~~shareholders~~stockholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution. Accordingly, we generally may not make a distribution on our common stock if, after giving effect to the distribution, we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business or our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus, unless the terms of such class or series provide otherwise, the amount that would be needed to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of the holders of shares of any class or series of preferred stock then outstanding, if any, with preferences senior to those of our common stock.

Our Board of Directors may change our strategy without ~~shareholder~~stockholder approval.

Our Board of Directors may change our strategy with respect to capitalization, investment, distributions and/or operations. Our Board of Directors may establish investment criteria or limitations as it deems appropriate, but currently does not limit the number or types of properties in which we may seek to invest or the concentration of investments in any one geographic region or the amount of development or redevelopment activity occurring across our portfolio. Although our Board of Directors has no present intention to revise or amend our strategies and policies, it may do so at any time without a vote by our ~~shareholders.~~stockholders. Accordingly, the results of decisions made by our Board of Directors and implemented by management could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations, including our ability to distribute cash to ~~shareholders~~stockholders or qualify as a REIT.

The rights of ~~shareholders~~stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited.

Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she satisfies his or her duties to ~~us and our shareholders.~~the corporation. As permitted by the MGCL, our charter limits the liability of our directors and officers to us and our ~~shareholders~~stockholders for monetary damages, except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or service, or a final judgment based upon a finding of active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was material to the cause of action adjudicated.

In addition, our charter and bylaws, as well as indemnification agreements that we have entered into with certain of our officers require us to indemnify our directors and officers, among others, for actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. As a result, we and our ~~shareholders~~stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist for companies organized in other jurisdictions. Accordingly, in the event that actions taken in good faith by any of our directors or officers impede the performance of our company, your ability to recover damages from such director or officer will be limited. In addition, we will be obligated to advance the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers with indemnification agreements, and may, at the discretion of our Board of Directors, advance the defense costs incurred by our employees and other agents, in connection with legal proceedings.

The market value of our ~~debt and~~ equity securities is subject to various factors that may cause significant fluctuations or ~~volatility.~~volatility, including future offerings of debt securities.

As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of our publicly traded securities depends on various factors which may change from time-to time and are often out of our ~~control. Among the conditions that may affect the market price of our publicly traded securities are the following:~~

These factors may cause the market price of our common stock to decline, in some cases regardless of our financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects. It is impossible to ensure that the market price of our common stock will not fall in the future. A decrease in the market price of our common stock could reduce our ability to raise additional equity in the public markets. Selling common stock at a decreased market price would have a dilutive impact on existing shareholders.

Future offerings of debt securities, which would be senior to our common and preferred stock, or equity securities, which would dilute the interests of our existing shareholders and may be senior to our existing common stock, may adversely affect the market prices of our common and preferred stock.

REITs. In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of debt or equity securities, including senior or subordinated notes and classes of preferred ~~or common~~ stock. ~~Holders~~Offerings of debt securities or shares of preferred stock will generally be entitled to receive interest payments or distributions, both current and in connection with any liquidation or sale, prior to the holders of our common stock. Furthermore, offerings of common stock or other equity securities may dilute the holdings of our existing ~~shareholders.~~stockholders. We are not required to offer any such equity securities to existing ~~shareholders~~stockholders on a preemptive basis, and future offerings of debt or equity securities, or perceptions that such offerings may occur, may reduce the market prices of our ~~common and~~ preferred ~~stock or the distributions that we pay with respect to our common~~ stock. Because we may generally issue any such debt or equity securities in the future without obtaining the consent of our ~~shareholders,~~stockholders, our ~~shareholders~~stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market prices of our ~~common and~~ preferred stock and diluting their proportionate ownership.

See Note 10 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in ~~any litigation, nor,~~Item 8 below for information relating to its knowledge, is any litigation threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries, which is either not covered by the Company’s liability insurance, or, in management’s opinion, would result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or resultslegal proceedings.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of ~~operations.~~

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of ~~common stock outstanding held by approximately 600 shareholders~~Financial Condition and Results of ~~record at December 31, 2019. The Company believes it has more than approximately 5,000 beneficial holders of its common stock. The Company’s shares trade on the NYSE under the symbol “CDR”.~~Operations

The following line graph sets forth for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019, a comparison of the percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock compared to the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 index and the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts All Equity REIT Index (“NAREIT All Equity REIT Index”). The graph assumes that the shares of the Company’s common stock were bought at the price of $100 per share and that the value of the investment in each of the Company’s common stock and the indices was $100 at the beginning of the period. The graph further assumes the reinvestment of dividends when paid.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

The Company is a ~~fully-integrated~~ real estate investment trust that focuses ~~primarily~~ on ~~ownership, operation~~owning and ~~redevelopment of~~operating income producing retail properties with a primary focus on grocery-anchored shopping centers in ~~high- density urban markets from Washington, D.C. to Boston.~~the Northeast. At December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, the Company owned ~~and managed~~ a portfolio of 5619 operating properties ~~(excluding properties “held for sale”)~~ totaling ~~8.3~~2.9 million square feet of GLA. The portfolio was ~~93.2%~~86.2% leased and ~~91.5%~~82.3% occupied at December 31, ~~2019.~~2022.

The Company, organized as a Maryland corporation, has established an umbrella partnership structure through the contribution of substantially all of its assets to the Operating Partnership, organized as a limited partnership under the laws of Delaware. The Company conducts substantially all of its business through the Operating Partnership. Prior to consummation of the Transactions described below, the Operating Partnership had limited partners other than the Company, but their limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership were canceled pursuant to the Merger Agreement, as described below. At December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, the Company owned a ~~99.4%~~100.0% general and limited partnership interest in, and was the sole general partner of, the Operating ~~Partnership.~~Partnership and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WHLR.

On November 25, 2020, the Company effected a 1-for-6.6 reverse stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Each 6.6 shares of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one share of the Company's common stock. The ~~limited partners’ interest in~~number of authorized shares and the par value of the common stock were not changed. In addition, the Company amended the Limited Partnership Agreement of our Operating Partnership ~~(0.6% at December 31, 2019) is represented by Operating Partnership Units (“OP Units”). The carrying amount~~to effect a corresponding reverse split of ~~such interest is adjusted at~~ the ~~end of each reporting period to an amount equal to the limited partners’ ownership percentage~~partnership interests of the Operating ~~Partnership’s net equity. The 537,000 OP Units outstanding at December 31, 2019 are economically equivalent to~~Partnership. In accordance with GAAP, all shares of ~~the Company’s common stock. The holders of OP Units have the right to exchange their OP Units for the same number of shares of the Company’s~~ common stock, ~~or, at~~restricted stock units, Operating Partnership units (“OP Units”) and per share/unit information that are presented in this Form10-K were adjusted to reflect the ~~Company’s option,~~reverse split on a retroactive basis for ~~cash.~~all periods presented.

The Company derives substantially all of its revenues from rents and operating expense reimbursements received pursuant to ~~long-term~~ leases. The Company’s operating results therefore depend on the ability of its tenants to make the payments required by the terms of their leases. The Company focuses its investment activities on grocery-anchored shopping centers. The Company believes that, because of the need of consumers to purchase food and other staple goods and services generally available at such centers, its type of “necessities-based” properties should provide relatively stable revenue flows even during difficult economic times.

On ~~June 19, 2019,~~March 2, 2022, the Company ~~purchased Girard Plaza,~~announced that following its previously announced review of strategic alternatives, it had entered into definitive agreements for the sale of the Company and its assets in a series of related all-cash transactions. Specifically, on March 2, 2022, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into an asset purchase and sale agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with DRA Fund X-B LLC and KPR Centers LLC (together with their respective designees, the “Grocery-Anchored Purchasers”) for the sale of a portfolio of 33 grocery-anchored shopping centers for cash (the “Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale”). In addition, on March 2, 2022, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with WHLR and certain of its affiliates pursuant to which, following closing of the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale, WHLR would acquire the balance of the Company’s shopping center ~~adjacent~~assets by way of an all-cash merger transaction (the “Merger”).

The transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Merger Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Transactions”. The Transactions were unanimously approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and were approved by the Company’s common stockholders at a special meeting of stockholders held on May 27, 2022.

On July 7, 2022, the Company and certain of its ~~South Philadelphia property, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.~~subsidiaries completed the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and the East River Park and Senator Square redevelopment asset sales for total gross proceeds of approximately $879 million, including the assumed debt. There were no material relationships among the Company, the Grocery-Anchored Purchasers, or any of their respective affiliates. On August 22, 2022, the Company completed the Merger. Each outstanding share of common stock of the Company and outstanding common unit of the Operating Partnership held by persons other than the Company immediately prior to the Merger were canceled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment of $9.48 per share or unit. As a result of the Merger, WHLR acquired all of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, which ceased to be publicly traded on the NYSE. The ~~purchase price~~Company's outstanding

7.25% Series B Preferred Stock and 6.50% Series C Preferred Stock remain outstanding and continue to trade on the NYSE. In addition, prior to consummation of the Merger, the Company's Board of Directors declared a special dividend on shares of the Company's outstanding common stock and OP Units of $19.52 per share, payable to holders of record of the Company's common stock and OP Units at the close of business on August 19, 2022.

In connection with the Transactions, the Company incurred transaction costs of $59.0 million for the ~~property was $8.5 million, which has been allocated to real estate assets and liabilities.~~

On February 15, 2019, the Company sold Maxatawny Marketplace, located in Maxatawny, Pennsylvania. The sales price for the property was $10.3 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $0.1 million, which has beenyear ended December 31, 2022, included ~~in continuing operations~~ in the accompanying consolidated statement of ~~operations.~~operations, of which $33.5 million relates to employee severance payments.

On June ~~26, 2019,~~28, 2022, the Company ~~sold Fort Washington Center, located~~acquired the 40% minority ownership interest percentage in ~~Fort Washington, Pennsylvania.~~the Crossroads II joint venture. The ~~sales price~~Company's ownership interest in Crossroads II was included in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale that occurred on July 7, 2022.

The following table shows the property disposition, excluding the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale, during the year ended December 31, 2022:

Impairments of $9.4 million for the ~~property was $9.0 million, which resulted~~year ended December 31, 2022 also include those related to the Company's investment in ~~a gain on sale of $2.8 million, which has been~~the unconsolidated joint venture and the note receivable associated with Senator Square. These impairments are included in ~~continuing operations~~operating loss in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

As the sale of ~~December 31, 2019, Carll’s Corner, located in Bridgeton, New Jersey, Suffolk Plaza, located in Suffolk, Virginia~~East River Park and ~~The Commons, located in Dubois, Pennsylvania,~~Senator Square redevelopment asset sales represent a strategic shift and has a material effect on the Company’s operations and financial results, and therefore, the Company determined that it is deemed a discontinued operation. Accordingly, they have been classified as ~~“real estate~~ held for ~~sale”~~sale and the results have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods. The Company recognized a $125.5 million gain on sale and $16.6 million in impairment charges for the ~~accompanying consolidated balance sheet. During 2019, an impairment charge of $8.9 million has been recorded~~year ended December 31, 2022 on discontinued operations.

The mortgage loans payable were assumed by the Grocery-Anchored Purchasers, in connection with ~~a property held for sale, which has been included~~the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale.

The unsecured revolving credit facility and term loans were paid off and terminated on July 11, 2022, in ~~continuing operations~~connection with the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale.

~~On December 18, 2018,~~Northeast Heights joint venture was sold in connection with the ~~Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program, which authorized the~~Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale. The Company ~~to purchase up to $30.0~~contributed approximately $4.8 million of ~~the Company’s common stock in the open market or~~capital to this joint venture through ~~private transactions, subject to market conditions. The stock repurchase program expired on December 18, 2019. During 2019, the Company repurchased~~

approximately 2,050,000 shares at a weighted average price per share of $3.34. Since approval of the plan on December 18, 2018, the Company has repurchased a total of 2,823,000 shares at a weighted average price per share of $3.25.its tenure.

On August 8, 2018, the Company purchased a land parcel adjacent to its Riverview Plaza property, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The purchase price for the land parcel was $1.0 million, which was comprised of $25,000 in cash and approximately 208,000 OP Units (based on the market price of the Company’s common stock).

~~On August 21, 2018,~~22, 2022, the Company entered into a ~~deed of lease~~loan agreement with KeyBank National Association for ~~Senator Square, a shopping center located in Washington, D.C.~~$130.0 million (the “KeyBank Credit Agreement”). The deed of lease conveys fee title in the buildings to the Company and contains future options to acquire fee title in the land at its then fair-value. This lease was originally presented in the Company’s financial statements as two separate components as follows: (1) a $5.7 million capital lease obligation for the fee interest ~~in the buildings, and (2) an operating lease for the land. The capital lease obligation was computed through the date~~rate on this term loan consisted of the ~~Company’s first purchase option, as discussed below,~~term Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 0.10% plus an applicable margin of 2.5% through February 2023, at which time increases to 4.0% and ~~reflects an interest rate of 5.3%. Effective January 1, 2019, based upon the adoption~~was collateralized by all of the ~~new lease accounting standard,~~Company's remaining 19 properties following the ~~component~~Transactions. As of December 31, 2022, the ~~lease that~~KeyBank Credit Agreement was ~~originally recorded as a capital lease obligation is now classified as a finance lease obligation.~~

~~The lease initially requires monthly payments of $75,000 through maturity in August 2117 unless~~repaid with the Company exercises one of its options to acquire the land. The first such option will be available between the 25th and 33rd anniversaries of the lease, depending on certain property benchmarks, with additional purchase options every 10 years thereafter during the lease term. The lease also provides for 1.5% annual increases which begin on approximately the 8th anniversary of the lease, depending on the aforementioned property benchmarks. In addition, at the time the Company’s first purchase option becomes available, the lease payments will be adjusted to the greater of then fair-value or the current payment amount. The lease payments are subject to similar adjustments at the

The Company has also issued a $3.5 million interest only mortgage note receivable to the lessor of Senator Square, which bears interest at 4.5% per annum. The maturity date of this mortgage note can range from 26.5 years to 34.5 yearsproceeds from the ~~date of issuance, based on the aforementioned property benchmarks.~~Guggenheim Loan Agreement and Citi Loan Agreement, as defined herein.

On ~~August~~October 28, 2018, the Company sold Mechanicsburg Center, located in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. The sales price for the property was $16.1 million, which resulted in a gain on sale of $4.9 million, which has been included in continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

On September 28, 2018, the Company sold West Bridgewater Plaza, located in West Bridgewater, Massachusetts. The sales price for the property was $3.5 million. An impairment charge of $9.4 million has been recorded in connection with the property during 2018, which has been included in continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

On July 24, 2018, the Company closed a new $75.0 million unsecured term loan maturing on July 24, 2025 (all of which was borrowed on September 28, 2018). Interest on borrowings under the term loan can range from LIBOR plus 170 to 225 basis points (“bps”) (170 bps at December 31, 2018) based on the Company’s leverage ratio. Additionally,2022, the Company entered into ~~forward interest rate swap agreements which convert the LIBOR rate to~~a term loan agreement with Guggenheim Real Estate, LLC for $110.0 million at a fixed rate ~~through its maturity.~~

~~Equity~~of 5.25% with interest-only payments due monthly (“Guggenheim Loan Agreement”). Commencing on December 10, 2027,

until the maturity date of November 10, 2032, monthly principal and interest payments will be made based on a 30-year amortization schedule calculated based on the principal amount as of that time. The Guggenheim Loan Agreement includes certain financial covenants. The Guggenheim Loan Agreement is collateralized by 10 properties and proceeds were used to paydown the Company’s KeyBank Credit Agreement.

On ~~January 12, 2018,~~December 21, 2022, the Company ~~redeemed 2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock~~entered into a term loan agreement with Citi Real Estate Funding Inc. (“Citi Loan Agreement”) for $25.0 million at a ~~price~~fixed rate of ~~$25.00 per share for an aggregate~~6.35% with interest-only payments due monthly through maturity on January 6, 2033. The Citi Loan Agreement is collateralized by 2 properties and proceeds were used to satisfy the remaining obligation of ~~$50.0 million, plus all accrued~~the KeyBank Credit Agreement and ~~unpaid dividends up to (but excluding)~~released the ~~redemption date.~~remaining collateral under that agreement.

~~On December 18, 2018,~~With the ~~Company’s Board~~completion of ~~Directors approved a stock repurchase program, which authorized~~the Company's merger with WHLR, the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of WHLR. WHLR performs property management and leasing services for the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company paid WHLR $1.0 million for these services. The related party amounts due to ~~purchase up to $30.0~~WHLR for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $7.3 million, which consists primarily of financing costs, real estate taxes and costs paid on the Company's behalf at the closing of the Company’s common stock in the open market or through private transactions, subject to market conditions. The stock repurchase program expired on December 18, 2019. During 2018, the Company repurchased approximately 772,000 shares at a weighted average price per share of $3.02.KeyBank Credit Agreement.

In April 2018, the Company accepted a cash payment of $4.3 million in consideration for permitting a dark anchor tenant to terminate its lease prior to the contractual expiration. At the time of the transaction, this anchor tenant was located at a property held for sale, and while paying its contractual rent prior to lease termination, it had closed and ceased retail operations at the property. As a result of this termination, revenues for 2018 includes $5.4 million, consisting of (1) $3.8 million of other income (the $4.3 million cash payment reduced by $0.5 million straight-line rent receivable) and (2) $1.5 million accelerated intangible lease liability amortization.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with ~~accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”)~~GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, real estate investments and purchase accounting allocations related thereto, asset impairment, and derivatives used to hedge interest-rate risks. Management’s estimates are based both on information that is currently available and on various other assumptions management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates and those estimates could be different under varying assumptions or conditions.

The Company has identified the following critical accounting policies, the application of which requires significant judgments and estimates:

Rental income with scheduled rent increases is recognized using the straight-line method over the respective terms of the leases. The aggregate excess of rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis over base rents under applicable lease provisions is included in straight-line rents receivable on the consolidated balance sheet. Leases also generally contain provisions under which the tenants reimburse the Company for a portion of property operating expenses and real estate taxes incurred; such income is recognized in the periods earned. In addition, certain operating leases contain contingent rent provisions under which tenants are required to pay a percentage of their sales in excess of a specified amount as additional rent. The Company defers recognition of contingent rental income until those specified targets are met.

The Company must make estimates as to the collectability of its accounts receivable related to base rent, straight-line rent, expense reimbursements and other revenues. Management analyzes accounts receivable by considering tenant creditworthiness, current economic conditions, and changes in tenants’ payment patterns when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. These estimates have a direct impact on net income, because a higher bad debt allowance would result in lower net income, whereas a lower bad debt allowance would result in higher net income.

Real estate investments are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. The provision for depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and betterments that do not materially prolong the normal useful life of an asset are charged to operations as incurred. Expenditures for betterments that substantially extend the useful lives of real estate assets are capitalized.

subjective estimates as to the useful lives of its real estate assets for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation to reflect on an annual

basis. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. A shorter estimate of the useful life of an asset would have the effect of increasing depreciation expense and lowering net income, whereas a longer estimate of the useful life of an asset would have the effect of reducing depreciation expense and increasing net income.

A variety of costs are incurred in the acquisition, development and leasing of a property, such as pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs, and other costs incurred during the period of development. After a determination is made to capitalize a cost, it is allocated to the specific component of a project that is benefited. The Company ceases capitalization on the portions substantially completed and occupied, or held available for occupancy, and capitalizes only those costs associated with the portions under construction. The Company considers a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but not later than one year from cessation of major development activity. Determination of when a development project is substantially complete and capitalization must cease involves a degree of judgment. The effect of a longer capitalization period would be to increase capitalized costs and would result in higher net income, whereas the effect of a shorter capitalization period would be to reduce capitalized costs and would result in lower net income.

The Company allocates the fair value of real estate acquired to land, buildings and improvements. In addition, the fair value of in-place leases is allocated to intangible lease assets and liabilities. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, which value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements based on management’s determination of the fair values of such assets. In valuing an acquired property’s intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, such as real estate taxes, insurance, other operating expenses, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on its evaluation of current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs.

The values of acquired above-market and below-market leases are recorded based on the present values (using discount rates which reflect the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the differences between the contractual amounts to be received and management’s estimate of market lease rates, measured over the terms of the respective leases that management deemed appropriate at the time of the acquisitions. Such valuations include a consideration of the ~~non-cancellable~~non-cancelable terms of the respective leases as well as any applicable renewal period(s). The fair values associated with below-market rental renewal options are determined based on the Company’s experience and the relevant facts and circumstances that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The values of above-market leases are amortized to rental income over the terms of the respective non-cancelable lease periods. The portion of the values of below-market leases associated with the original non-cancelable lease terms are amortized to rental income over the terms of the respective non-cancelable lease periods. The portion of the values of the leases associated with below-market renewal options that are likely of exercise are amortized to rental income over the respective renewal periods. The value of other intangible assets (including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, etc.) is amortized to expense over the applicable terms of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recognized in operations at that time.

Management is required to make subjective assessments in connection with its valuation of real estate acquisitions. These assessments have a direct impact on net income because (1) above-market and below-market lease intangibles are amortized to rental income and (2) the value of other intangibles is amortized to expense. Accordingly, higher allocations to below-market lease liability and other intangibles would result in higher rental income and amortization expense, whereas lower allocations to below-market lease liability and other intangibles would result in lower rental income and amortization expense.

Management reviews each real estate investment for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a real estate investment may not be recoverable. The review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the future cash flows that are expected to result from the real estate investment’s use and eventual disposition. These estimates of cash flows consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If an impairment event exists due to the projected inability to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value. A real estate investment held for sale is carried at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value, less the cost of a potential sale. Depreciation and amortization are suspended during the period the property is held for sale. Management is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate properties. These assessments have a direct impact on net income, because an impairment loss is recognized in the period that the assessment is made.

See Note 2 of ~~Notes~~“Notes to Consolidated Financial ~~Statements~~Statements” included in Item 8 below for information relating to new accounting pronouncements.

Revenues were lower primarily as a result of (1) ~~$5.4 million relating to a dark anchor tenant terminating its lease prior to the contractual expiration in 2018 at West Bridgewater Plaza, (2)~~ a decrease of ~~$3.4~~$5.7 million in rental revenues and expense recoveries attributable to properties that were sold or held for sale in ~~2019~~2022 and ~~2018, (3) a decrease~~2021 not deemed to be discontinued operations, which is partially offset by (2) an increase of ~~$0.8~~$0.2 million in rental revenues, ~~and~~ expense recoveries and a non-recurring income item attributable to ~~same-center~~same center properties, ~~which was driven by the adoption of the new lease accounting standard (see Note 2 – “Recently-Adopted Accounting Pronouncements”),~~ and ~~(4) a decrease of $0.1 million in rental revenues and expense recoveries attributable to redevelopment properties, partially offset by (1)~~(3) an increase ~~of $1.7 million~~ in ~~rental revenues and expense recoveries attributable to properties acquired in 2019 and 2018, and (2) an increase of~~ other income of ~~$0.4 million.~~$0.3 million attributable to one-time transactions for properties that were sold in 2022.

Property operating expenses were higher primarily as a result of (1) an increase of ~~$1.1~~$1.5 million in property operating expenses attributable to same center properties, (2) an increase of $0.4 million attributable to one-time property operating expenses for properties that were sold in 2022, partially offset by (3) a decrease of $1.7 million in property operating expenses attributable to properties ~~acquired~~sold or held for sale during 2022 and 2021 not deemed to be discontinued operations.

General and administrative costs were lower primarily as a result of (1) a decrease of $5.6 million in ~~2019~~payroll related costs due to employee departure, (2) a decrease of $1.2 million in legal and ~~2018,~~professional expense, and (3) a decrease of $0.9 million in other general and administrative accounts.

Depreciation and amortization expenses were lower as a result of (1) a decrease of $1.4 million attributable to same center properties and (2) a decrease of $1.1 million attributable to properties that were sold or held for sale in 2022 and 2021 not deemed to be discontinued operations.

Gain on sales in 2021 relates to the sale of Camp Hill Shopping Center, located in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania.

Impairment charges in 2022 relate to Riverview Plaza, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Company's investment in the unconsolidated joint venture and the note receivable associated with Senator Square located in Washington D.C. Impairment charges in 2021 relate to the Company's dual-track strategic alternatives process, partially offset by impairment reversal related to The Commons, located in Dubois, Pennsylvania.

Transaction costs in 2022 relate to costs incurred related to the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and the Merger with WHLR.

Interest expense, net was lower as a result of (1) a decrease in the overall weighted average principal balance which resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $6.4 million, (2) a decrease in the overall weighted average interest rate which resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $3.1 million, (3) an increase in interest income of $0.5 million, partially offset by (4) a decrease in capitalized interest of $2.4 million and (5) an increase of ~~$0.6~~$4.6 million related to the acceleration of amortization of deferred financing costs.

Discontinued operations for 2022 and 2021 include the results of operations, impairments and gain on sales for properties treated as discontinued operations.

Property operating expenses were higher primarily as a result of (1) an increase of $6.5 million in property operating expenses attributable to ~~the Company’s redevelopment~~same-center properties, partially offset by ~~(1)~~(2) a decrease of ~~$0.8~~$4.2 million in property operating expenses attributable to properties that were sold or held for sale in ~~2019~~2021 and 2018, and (2) a decrease of $0.7 million in property operating expenses attributable to same-center properties which was driven by the adoption of the new lease accounting standard (see Note 2 – “Recently-Adopted Accounting Pronouncements”).2020.

General and administrative costs were higher primarily as a result of (1) an increase ~~in payroll expense~~ of ~~$2.8~~$0.6 million ~~predominantly relating to the adoption of the new lease accounting standard in 2019 which no longer permits the capitalization of initial direct leasing costs, and (2) an increase~~ in legal and professional ~~fees of $0.6 million, partially offset by the reversal of $1.5 million of accrued expenses related to the termination of the prior Chief Operating Officer.~~

~~Depreciation and amortization~~ ~~expenses were higher primarily as a result (1)~~ ~~accelerated depreciation of $4.3 million in 2019 relating to the demolition of certain existing buildings at redevelopment properties,~~expense, (2) an increase of ~~$1.5~~$0.6 million ~~attributable~~in other general and administrative accounts related predominantly to ~~same-center properties, (3) an increase of $1.2 million attributable to redevelopment properties, and (4) an increase of $0.5 million attributable to properties acquired in 2019 and 2018,~~state taxes, which is partially offset by (3) a decrease of ~~$1.6~~$0.1 million in payroll expense related to the reduction in head count in the fourth quarter of 2021.

Depreciation and amortization expenses were lower as a result of (1) a decrease of $2.6 million attributable to properties that were sold or held for sale in ~~2019~~2021 and ~~2018.~~2020 and (2) a decrease of $1.7 million attributable to same-center properties.

Gain on sales in ~~2019~~2021 relates to the sale of ~~Maxatawny Marketplace, located in Maxatawny, Pennsylvania and Fort Washington~~Camp Hill Shopping Center, located in ~~Fort Washington,~~Camp Hill, Pennsylvania. Gain on ~~sale~~sales in ~~2018~~2020 relates to the sale of ~~Mechanicsburg~~(1) Glen Allen Shopping Center, located in ~~Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.~~Glen Allen, Virginia, (2) Suffolk Plaza, located in Suffolk, Virginia, and (3) an outparcel building at Pine Grove Plaza, located in Brown Mills, New Jersey.

Impairment charges in ~~2019~~2021 relate to the Company's dual-track strategic alternatives process, partially offset by impairment reversal related to The Commons, located in Dubois, Pennsylvania. Impairment charges in ~~2018~~2020 relate to ~~(1) West Bridgewater Plaza,~~Metro Square, located in ~~West Bridgewater, Pennsylvania totaling $9.4 million,~~Owings Mills, Maryland, and ~~(2) Carll’s Corner,~~The Commons, located in ~~Bridgeton, New Jersey totaling $11.3 million~~Dubois, Pennsylvania.

Interest expense was ~~higher as a result of an increase in the overall weighted average interest rate.~~

~~Early extinguishment of debt costs~~ ~~in 2018 relates to defeasement fees and the accelerated write-off of unamortized costs associated with the prepayment of certain mortgage loans payable.~~

~~Revenues~~ were higher primarily as a result of (1) $5.4 million relating to a dark anchor tenant terminating its lease prior to the contractual expiration at a property held for sale, (2) an increase of $1.4 million in rental revenues and expense recoveries attributable to redevelopment properties, (3) an increase of $1.2 million in rental revenues and expense recoveries attributable to properties acquired in 2018 and 2017, and (4) an increase of $0.9 million in rental revenues and expense recoveries attributable to same-center properties, partially offset by (1) a decrease of $2.3 million in rental revenues and expense recoveries attributable to properties that were sold or held for sale in 2018 and 2017, and (2) a decrease in other income of $0.6 million.

~~Property operating expenses~~ were higher primarily as a result of (1) an increase of $1.4 million in property operating expenses attributable to same-center properties (consisting primarily of increases in (a) real estate taxes of $0.6 million, (b) snow removal costs of $0.3 million, and (c) insurance expense of $0.2 million), (2) an increase of $1.2 million in property operating expenses attributable to redevelopment properties, and (3) an increase of $0.8 million in property operating expenses attributable to properties acquired in 2018 and 2017.

~~General and administrative~~ ~~costs remained consistent as a result of an increase in legal fees of $0.8 million, offset by nominal decrease in various other general and administrative expenses.~~

~~Acquisition pursuit costs~~ ~~in 2017 relate to acquisitions the Company chose not to continue to pursue.~~

~~Depreciation and amortization~~ ~~expenses remained consistent~~lower as a result of (1) a ~~$0.8 million write-off arising from a lease termination for permitting a dark anchor tenant to terminate its lease prior to~~decrease in the ~~contractual expiration, (2) an increase of $0.7 million attributable to same-center properties, and (3) an increase of $0.3 million attributable to properties acquired~~overall weighted average principal balance which resulted in ~~2018 and 2017, partially offset by (1)~~ a decrease in interest expense of ~~$1.2~~$5.8 million, ~~attributable to properties that were sold or held for sale in 2018 and 2017, and~~ (2) ~~a decrease of $0.7 million attributable to redevelopment properties.~~

~~Gain on sale~~ in 2018 relates to the sale of Mechanicsburg Center, located in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. Gain on sale in 2017 relates to the sale of an outparcel building adjacent to Camp Hill, located in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania.

~~Impairment charges~~ in 2018 relate to (1) West Bridgewater Plaza, located in West Bridgewater, Pennsylvania totaling $9.4 million, and (2) Carll’s Corner, located in Bridgeton, New Jersey totaling $11.3 million. Impairment charges in 2017 relate to Fredericksburg Way, located in Fredericksburg, Virginia.

~~Interest expense~~ ~~remained consistent as a result of (1)~~ an increase in capitalized interest of ~~$0.8~~$0.7 million, ~~and (2) a decrease of $0.2 million in amortization of deferred financing costs,~~ partially offset by ~~(1) an increase of $0.8 million as a result of~~(3) an increase in the overall weighted average interest rate ~~and (2) an increase of $0.2 million as a result of~~which resulted in an increase in interest expense of $0.6 million.

Discontinued operations for 2021 and 2020 include the ~~overall outstanding principal balance~~results of ~~debt.~~operations, impairments and gain on sales for properties treated as discontinued operations.

~~Early extinguishment of debt costs~~ in 2018 relates to defeasement fees and the accelerated write-off of unamortized fees associated with the prepayment of certain mortgage loans payable. Early extinguishment of debt costs in 2017 relates to the accelerated write-off of unamortized fees associated with an amended and restated credit facility, and the accelerated write-off of unamortized fees associated with the prepayment of a mortgage loan payable.

Same-property net operating income (“same-property NOI”) is a widely-used non-GAAP financial measure for REITs that the Company believes, when considered with financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, is useful to investors as it provides an indication of the recurring cash generated by the Company’s properties by excluding certain non-cash revenues and expenses, as well as other infrequent items such as lease termination income which tends to fluctuate more than rents from year to year. Properties are included in same-property NOI if they are owned and operated for the entirety of both periods being compared, except for properties undergoing significant redevelopment and expansion until such properties have stabilized, and properties classified as held for sale. Consistent with the capital treatment of such costs under GAAP, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other direct leasing costs are excluded from same-property NOI.

The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is consolidated operating income. Same-property NOI should not be considered as an alternative to consolidated operating income prepared in accordance with GAAP or as a measure of liquidity. Further, same-property NOI is a measure for which there is no standard industry definition and, as such, it is not consistently defined or reported on among the Company’s peers, and thus may not provide an adequate basis for comparison among REITs.

The following table reconciles same-property NOI to the Company’s consolidated operating ~~income:~~loss:

Same-property NOI for the ~~comparative~~comparable years ~~increased by 0.3%. The results are driven~~decreased 5.4% primarily ~~by an increase~~as a result of non-recurring operating expenses in ~~average base rent of $0.22 per square foot, partially offset by a decrease in occupancy of 50 bps.~~2022.

The following is a summary of the Company’s retail leasing activity during ~~2019:~~2022 for the 19-property portfolio since the Merger with WHLR:

~~(a)~~

~~Includes both tenant allowance and landlord work. Excludes first generation space.~~

(b)

The Company does not include ground leases entered into for the purposes of new lease sq feet and weighted average rate (per sq foot) on new leases.

~~(b)~~

~~Includes leases signed at first generation and expansion spaces.~~

~~(c)~~

~~Legal fees and leasing commissions averaged a combined total of $1.44 per square foot.~~

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company funds operating expenses and other short-term liquidity requirements, including debt service and loan maturities, tenant improvements, leasing commissions ~~preferred~~ and ~~common~~preferred dividend distributions, ~~and distributions to minority interest partners, if made,~~ primarily from its operations. The Company may also use its revolving credit facility for these purposes. The Company expects to fund long-term liquidity requirements for property acquisitions, redevelopment costs, capital improvements,operations and ~~maturing debt initially with its revolving credit facility, and ultimately through a combination of issuing and/or assuming additional debt,~~ the sale of equity securities, the issuance of additional OP Units, and/or the sale of properties. Although the Company believes it has access to secured and unsecured financing, there can be no assurance that the Company will have the availability of financing on completed development projects, additional construction financing, or proceeds from the refinancing of existing debt.

As$9.6 million in restricted cash as of December 31, ~~2019, the Company had $95.6 million available for additional borrowings under its revolving credit facility.~~ 2022.

The Company has aconsidered its short-term (one year or less) liquidity needs and the adequacy of its estimated cash flows from operating activities and other expected financing sources to meet these needs. The Company does not have any scheduled debt maturities for the year ending December 31, 2023. Additionally, the Company plans to undertake measures to grow its operations and increase liquidity through backfilling vacant anchor spaces, replacing tenants who are in default of their lease terms, increasing future lease revenue through tenant improvements partially funded by restricted cash, disposition of assets, refinancing properties and operating cash.

On August 30, 2021, the Company amended its then-existing $300 million unsecured credit facility ~~which, as amended~~ and ~~restated on September 8, 2017, consisting of (1) a $250 million revolving credit facility, and (2) a~~ $50 million term loan. ~~Under~~After the amendment, the unsecured revolving credit facility was $185 million with an ~~accordion feature,~~expiration in August 2024. The unsecured revolving credit facility was able to be extended, at the ~~facility can be increased to $750 million,~~Company’s option for two additional one-year periods, subject to customary ~~conditions and lending commitments.~~

~~On December 18, 2018,~~conditions. Interest on the borrowings under the unsecured revolving credit facility component could range from LIBOR plus 135 bps to 195 bps (150 bps at June 30, 2022, prior to its pay off, as discussed below), based on the Company’s ~~Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program, which authorized the~~leverage ratio. The Company ~~to purchase up to $30.0~~extended its $50 million ~~of the Company’s common stock~~term loan four years with an expiration in the open market or through private transactions, subject to market conditions. The stock repurchase program expired on December 18, 2019. During 2019, the Company repurchased approximately 2,050,000 shares at a weighted average price per share of $3.34. Since approval of the plan on December 18, 2018, the Company has repurchased a total of 2,823,000 shares at a weighted average price per share of $3.25.August 2026.

The Company’s unsecured credit facility and term loans contain financial covenants including, but not limited to, maximum debt leverage, maximum secured debt, minimum fixed charge coverage, and minimum net worth. In addition, the facilities contain restrictions including, but not limited to, limits on indebtedness, certain investments and distributions. Although the credit ~~facilities are~~facility was unsecured, borrowing availability iswas based on unencumbered property adjusted net operating income for the trailing twelve months, as defined in the agreements. The Company’s failure to comply with the covenants or the occurrence of an event of default under the facilities could result in the acceleration of the related debt and exercise of other lender remedies. As of December 31, 2019, the Company is in compliance with all financial covenants. Interest on borrowings under the unsecured revolving credit facility and term loans ~~are~~were paid off and terminated on July 11, 2022, in connection with the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale.

On May 5, 2021, the Company closed a non-recourse mortgage for $114.0 million. The mortgage matures June 1, 2031, bears interest at a fixed-rate of 3.49% and requires payment of interest-only for the first five years followed by payments of principal and interest based on thirty-year amortization for the remainder of the term. The loan is secured by five shopping centers consisting of Lawndale Plaza, The Shops at Suffolk Downs, Christina Crossing, Trexlertown Plaza, and The Point. These properties had no pre-existing debt and the proceeds from this loan were used to reduce amounts outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The mortgage loans payable were assumed by the Grocery-Anchored Purchasers, in connection with the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale.

On August 22, 2022, the Company entered into the KeyBank Credit Agreement for $130.0 million. The interest rate on this term loan consisted of the term Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 0.10% plus an applicable margin of 2.5% through February 2023, at which time increases to 4.0% and was collateralized by all of the Company's remaining 19 properties following the Transactions. As of December 31, 2022, the KeyBank Credit Agreement was repaid with the proceeds from the Guggenheim Loan Agreement and Citi Loan Agreement.

On October 28, 2022, the Company entered into the Guggenheim Loan Agreement for $110.0 million at a fixed rate of 5.25% with interest-only payments due monthly. Commencing on December 10, 2027, until the maturity date of November 10, 2032, monthly principal and interest payments will be made based on a 30-year amortization schedule calculated based on the principal amount as of that time. The Guggenheim Loan Agreement includes certain financial covenants. The Guggenheim Loan Agreement is collateralized by 10 properties and proceeds were used to paydown the Company’s ~~leverage ratio.~~KeyBank Credit Agreement.

~~Debt~~On December 21, 2022, the Company entered into the Citi Loan Agreement for $25.0 million at a fixed rate of 6.35% with interest-only payments due monthly through maturity on January 6, 2033. The Citi Loan Agreement is collateralized by 2 properties and ~~finance lease~~proceeds were used to satisfy the remaining obligation of the KeyBank Credit Agreement and released the remaining collateral under that agreement.

Debt obligations are composed of the following at December 31, ~~2019:~~2022 and collateralized by 12 properties:


		December 31, 2022
					Contractual
	Maturity	Balance			interest rates
Description	dates	outstanding			weighted-average
Fixed-rate:
Term loan	Nov 2032	$	110,000,000		5.3%
Term loan	Jan 2033		25,000,000		6.4%
			135,000,000		5.5%
Unamortized issuance costs			(3,538,000	)
		$	131,462,000

December 31, 2019

Contractual

Maturity

Balance

interest rates

Description

dates

outstanding

weighted-average

Fixed-rate mortgage

Jun 2026

$
46,679,000

3.9%

Finance lease obligation

Sep 2050

5,665,000

5.3%

Unsecured credit facilities (a):

Variable-rate:

Revolving credit facility

Sep 2021
(b)

106,000,000

3.2%

Term loan

Sep 2022

50,000,000

3.3%

Fixed-rate (c):

Term loan

Feb 2021

75,000,000

3.6%

Term loan

Feb 2022

50,000,000

3.0%

Term loan

Sep 2022
(d)

50,000,000

2.8%

Term loan

Apr 2023

100,000,000

3.2%

Term loan

Sep 2024

75,000,000

3.7%

Term loan

Jul 2025

75,000,000

4.6%

633,344,000

3.5%

Unamortized issuance costs

(2,769,000
)

$
630,575,000

~~(a)~~

During the first quarter of 2020, the weighted average interest rate for the Company’s unsecured credit facilities increased 14 bps (ranging from an increase of 10 bps to 15 bps for each individual borrowing) as a result of a slight increase in the Company’s leverage ratio.

~~(b)~~

~~The revolving credit facility is subject to a one-year extension at the Company’s option.~~

~~(c)~~

The interest rates on these term loans consist of LIBOR plus a credit spread based on the Company’s leverage ratio, for which the Company has interest rate swap agreements which convert the LIBOR rates to fixed rates. Accordingly, these term loans are presented as fixed-rate debt.

~~(d)~~

The current interest rate swap agreement expires in February 2020 at which time a new interest rate swap agreement will begin resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.2%, based on the Company’s leverage ratio at December 31, 2019.

The following table details the Company’s debt ~~and finance lease~~ obligation maturities at December 31, ~~2019:~~2022:


2023	$	—
2024		—
2025		—
2026		—
2027		126,000
Thereafter		134,874,000
	$	135,000,000

Mortgage Loan

Finance Lease

Revolving

Term

Unamortized

Year

Payable

Obligation

Credit Facility

Loans

Total

Issuance Costs

Total

2020

$
1,034,000

$
33,000

$
-

$
-

$
1,067,000

$
(767,000
)

$
300,000

2021

1,074,000

35,000

106,000,000

(a)

75,000,000

182,109,000

(648,000
)

181,461,000

2022

1,116,000

37,000

-

150,000,000

151,153,000

(499,000
)

150,654,000

2023

1,160,000

39,000

-

100,000,000

101,199,000

(274,000
)

100,925,000

2024

1,206,000

41,000

-

75,000,000

76,247,000

(207,000
)

76,040,000

Thereafter

41,089,000

5,480,000

-

75,000,000

121,569,000

(374,000
)

121,195,000

$
46,679,000

$
5,665,000

$
106,000,000

$
475,000,000

$
633,344,000

$
(2,769,000
)

$
630,575,000

~~(a)~~

~~The revolving credit facility is subject to a one-year extension at the Company's option.~~

~~The remaining property-specific mortgage loan payable matures in 2026. Mortgage~~Term loans payable may require the Company to deposit certain replacement and other reserves with its lenders. Such “restricted cash” is generally available only for property-level requirements for which the reserves have been established and isare not available to fund other property-level or Company-level obligations.

In order to continue qualifying as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its “REIT taxable income”, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company paid common stock and preferred stock dividends during ~~2019~~2021, and, ~~2018. While~~in 2022, paid preferred stock dividends through the fourth quarter of 2022 and has continued to declare preferred stock dividends through the first quarter of 2023. Additionally, the Company ~~intends~~paid dividends to ~~continue paying regular quarterly dividends, future~~the common stockholders in the first quarter and third quarter of 2022. Future dividend declarations will continue to be at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and will depend on the cash flow and financial condition of the Company, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under

the REIT provisions of the Code, and such other factors as the Board of

Directors may deem relevant. ~~Additionally, the~~The Company ~~may reduce or suspend payment of dividends~~intends to ~~retain cash and reduce debt obligations and/or~~continue to ~~fund redevelopments and other capital needs.~~operate its business in a manner that will allow it to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax requirements.

~~Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments~~

The following table sets forth the Company’s significant debt repayment, interest, ~~finance~~ and operating lease obligations at December 31, ~~2019:~~2022:


	Maturity Date
	2023		2024		2025		2026		2027		Thereafter		Total
Debt:
Secured term loans	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	126,000	$	134,874,000	$	135,000,000
Interest payments (a)		7,398,000		7,485,000		7,465,000		7,465,000		7,465,000		35,860,000		73,138,000
Operating lease obligations		179,000		179,000		179,000		179,000		179,000		7,852,000		8,747,000
Total	$	7,577,000	$	7,664,000	$	7,644,000	$	7,644,000	$	7,770,000	$	178,586,000	$	216,885,000

Maturity Date

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

Thereafter

Total

Debt:

Mortgage loan payable
$
1,034,000

$
1,074,000

$
1,116,000

$
1,160,000

$
1,206,000

$
41,089,000

$
46,679,000

Unsecured revolving credit facility (a)

-

106,000,000

-

-

-

-

106,000,000

Unsecured term loans

-

75,000,000

150,000,000

100,000,000

75,000,000

75,000,000

475,000,000

Interest payments (b)

21,913,000

18,468,000

13,438,000

8,856,000

6,934,000

4,014,000

73,623,000

Finance lease obligation (principal and interest)

333,000

333,000

333,000

333,000

333,000

10,729,000

12,394,000

Operating lease obligations

1,657,000

1,202,000

1,112,000

1,114,000

1,114,000

29,704,000

35,903,000

Total
$
24,937,000

$
202,077,000

$
165,999,000

$
111,463,000

$
84,587,000

$
160,536,000

$
749,599,000

(a)

Represents interest payments expected to be incurred on the Company's debt obligations as of December 31, 2022.

~~(a)~~

~~The revolving credit facility is subject to a one-year extension at the Company's option.~~

~~(b)~~

~~Represents interest payments expected to be incurred on the Company's debt obligations as of December 31, 2019, including interest that may subsequently be capitalized.~~ The interest rates used in this calculation in regards to the unsecured revolving credit facility and term loan not subject to interest rate swap agreements consist of LIBOR plus a credit spread based on the Company’s leverage ratio as of December 31, 2019, with ~~the rate in effect at December 31, 2019 being assumed to remain in effect until their maturities.~~ The interest rates used in this calculation in regards to the unsecured term loans subject to interest rate swap agreements consists of LIBOR plus a credit spread based on the Company’s leverage ratio as of December 31, 2019, for which the Company has converted the LIBOR rates to fixed rates.

In addition, the Company has no outstanding construction commitments ~~totaling approximately $13.6 million~~ at December 31, ~~2019.~~2022.

~~Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements~~

Other than the items disclosed in the ~~Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments section~~table above, the Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, ~~2019~~2022 that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Net Cash Flows

	Year ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			Years ended December 31,
Cash flows provided by (used in):
										2022			2021			2020
Cash flows (used in) provided by:
Operating activities	$	53,675,000		$	57,900,000		$	57,093,000		$	(20,464,000	)	$	44,962,000		$	42,580,000
Investing activities	$	(22,342,000	)	$	(14,938,000	)	$	(45,497,000	)	$	676,775,000		$	71,534,000		$	(18,369,000	)
Financing activities	$	(30,563,000	)	$	(48,204,000	)	$	(10,139,000	)	$	(646,117,000	)	$	(114,864,000	)	$	(25,321,000	)

Operating Activities

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities, before net changes in operating assets and liabilities, was ~~$56.1~~$(28.9) million, ~~$66.7~~$48.7 million, and ~~$65.5~~$57.5 million for ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017,~~2020, respectively. The decrease between ~~2019~~2022 and ~~2018~~2021 was ~~primarily~~ a result of ~~(1)~~ the ~~Company accepting a payment of $4.3 million in consideration for permitting a dark anchor tenant to terminate its lease prior~~transaction costs related to the ~~contractual expiration in 2018, (2) an increase in cash paid for interest,~~Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and ~~(3) property dispositions in 2019 and 2018.~~completion of the Company's merger with WHLR. The increase between ~~2018~~2021 and ~~2017~~2020 was primarily a result of the Company accepting a payment of $4.3 million in consideration for permitting a dark anchor tenant to terminate its lease prior to the contractual expiration in 2018, partially offset by an increase in cash paid for interest.favorable impact post COVID-19.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows ~~used in~~provided by (used in) investing activities were primarily the result of the Company’s property disposition activities, property acquisitions and expenditures for property improvements. During ~~2019~~2022, the Company ~~incurred expenditures of $31.9 million for property improvements, and acquired a property for $9.1 million, which was partially offset by $18.7~~received $667.4 million in proceeds from the ~~sales of properties. During 2018, the Company incurred expenditures of $30.4 million for property improvements~~Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and ~~issued a $3.5 million mortgage note receivable, which was partially offset by $19.1~~$31.9 million in proceeds from the sale of ~~properties.~~Riverview Plaza, which was partially offset by $22.4 million of expenditures for property improvements. During ~~2017,~~2021, the

Company ~~acquired shopping centers~~received proceeds of $104.5 million from the sale of properties, which was partially offset by (1) expenditures of $28.3 million for ~~$32.4~~property improvements and (2) investment of $4.7 million ~~and~~in an unconsolidated joint venture. During 2020, the Company incurred expenditures of ~~$25.6~~$39.6 million for property improvements, which was partially offset by ~~$12.5~~$21.2 million in proceeds from the sale of ~~an outparcel building.~~properties.

Financing Activities

During ~~2019,~~2022, the Company ~~paid $28.6~~made $408.1 million of preferred and common stock distributions, a $300.0 million term loan payoff, $130.7 million of mortgage repayments, net payments of $66.0 million under the revolving credit facility, payments of $7.4 million of debt financing costs, $1.4 million of distributions to limited partners, and the purchase of a minority interest in a joint venture for $1.0 million, which were partially offset by $265.0 million in new term loans and a $3.4 million benefit as a result of interest rate swap terminations. During 2021, the Company repaid $100.0 million of term loans, had $109.0 million of net, repayments under the revolving credit facility, had $14.7 million of preferred and common stock distributions, had ~~$6.8~~$3.3 million of ~~common stock repurchases, and~~payments related to deferred financing costs, had ~~$1.0~~$1.1 million of mortgage repayments, had $0.5 million of termination payments related to a swap, which ~~was~~is partially offset by ~~net borrowings~~$114.0 million of ~~$6.0 million under the revolving credit facility.~~property specific mortgages placed during 2021. During ~~2018,~~2020, the Company ~~had $80.3~~repaid a $75.0 million ~~of repayments of mortgage obligations, paid $50.0 million to partially redeem shares of its Series B Preferred Stock,~~term loan, had ~~$29.6~~

$17.9 million of preferred and common stock distributions, had ~~$5.2~~$1.1 million of ~~payment for early extinguishment of debt costs, had $2.3~~mortgage repayments, and paid $0.3 million of ~~common stock repurchases, and $0.7 million of payments for~~ debt financing costs, which ~~was~~were partially offset by ~~a $75.0 million borrowing under a new term loan, and~~ net ~~borrowings~~advances of ~~$45.0~~$69.0 million under the revolving credit facility. During 2017, the Company paid $112.5 million to partially redeem shares of its Series B Preferred Stock, had $31.3 million of preferred and common stock distributions, net repayments of $17.0 million under the revolving credit facility, $10.3 million of repayments of mortgage obligations, and $2.5 million of payments for debt financing costs, which was partially offset by net proceeds of $120.4 million from the sale of shares of its Series C Preferred Stock, and net proceeds of $43.2 million from the sales of its common stock.

Funds From Operations

Funds From Operations (“FFO”) is a widely recognized supplemental non-GAAP measure utilized to evaluate the financial performance of a REIT. The Company presents FFO in accordance with the definition adopted by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“~~NAREIT”~~Nareit”). ~~NAREIT~~Nareit generally defines FFO as net income ~~attributable to common shareholders~~ (determined in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of real estate properties, impairment ~~provisions~~write-downs on real estate properties directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and adjustments for partnerships and joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same basis. The Company considers FFO to be an appropriate measure of its financial performance because it captures features particular to real estate performance by recognizing that real estate generally appreciates over time or maintains residual value to a much greater extent than other depreciable assets.

The Company also considers Operating Funds From Operations (“Operating FFO”) to be an additional meaningful financial measure of financial performance because it excludes items the Company does not believe are indicative of its core operating performance, such as non-capitalized acquisition pursuit costs, amounts relating to early extinguishment of debt and preferred stock redemption costs, management transition costs and certain redevelopment costs. The Company believes Operating FFO further assists in comparing the Company’s performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding such items.

FFO and Operating FFO should be reviewed with net income attributable to common shareholders, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, when trying to understand the Company’s operating performance. FFO and Operating FFO do not represent cash generated from operating activities and should not be considered as an alternative to net income attributable to common shareholders or to cash flow from operating activities. The Company’s computations of FFO and Operating FFO may differ from the computations utilized by other REITs and, accordingly, may not by comparable to such REITs.

A reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders to FFO and Operating FFO for the years ended December 31, ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017~~2020 is as follows:


	Years ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders	$	33,279,000		$	(55,851,000	)	$	(11,824,000	)
Real estate depreciation and amortization		19,318,000			39,380,000			48,297,000
Limited partners' interest		132,000			(329,000	)		(66,000	)
Gain on sales		(125,500,000	)		(49,904,000	)		(4,396,000	)
Impairment charges		25,979,000			99,888,000			7,607,000
Consolidated minority interests:
Share of income		—			425,000			618,000
Share of FFO		—			(303,000	)		(388,000	)
FFO applicable to diluted common shares		(46,792,000	)		33,306,000			39,848,000
Transaction costs (a)		58,959,000			—			—
Redevelopment costs (b)		—			230,000			483,000
Financing costs (c)		—			215,000			—
Operating FFO applicable to diluted common shares	$	12,167,000		$	33,751,000		$	40,331,000

FFO per diluted common share	$	(3.40	)	$	2.40		$	2.88
Operating FFO per diluted common share	$	0.88		$	2.43		$	2.91
Weighted average number of diluted common shares (d):
Common shares and equivalents		13,717,000			13,814,000			13,758,000
OP Units		44,000			81,000			81,000
		13,761,000			13,895,000			13,839,000

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Net (loss) attributable to common shareholders

$
(9,676,000
)

$
(10,481,000
)

$
(2,399,000
)
Real estate depreciation and amortization

45,677,000

39,858,000

39,922,000

Limited partners' interest

(57,000
)

(28,000
)

(13,000
)
Gain on sales

(2,942,000
)

(4,864,000
)

(7,099,000
)
Impairment charges

8,938,000

20,689,000

9,538,000

Consolidated minority interests:

Share of income

547,000

497,000

523,000

Share of FFO

(414,000
)

(430,000
)

(440,000
)
FFO applicable to diluted common shares

42,073,000

45,241,000

40,032,000

Reversal of management transition costs (a)

(1,500,000
)

—

—

Redevelopment costs (b)

196,000

—

37,000

Preferred stock redemption costs

—

3,507,000

7,890,000

Financing costs (c)

—

4,829,000

210,000

Acquisition pursuit costs (d)

—

—

156,000

Operating FFO applicable to diluted common shares

$
40,769,000

$
53,577,000

$
48,325,000

FFO per diluted common share

$
0.46

$
0.49

$
0.45

Operating FFO per diluted common share

$
0.45

$
0.58

$
0.55

Weighted average number of diluted common shares (e):

Common shares and equivalents

90,607,000

92,361,000

87,948,000

OP Units

547,000

429,000

350,000

91,154,000

92,790,000

88,298,000

(a)

Includes costs incurred in connection with the previously announced dual-track strategic alternatives process.

(b)

Includes redevelopment project costs expensed pursuant to GAAP such as certain demolition and lease termination costs.

(c)

Represents acceleration of amortization of financing costs related to term note paid-off prior to maturity.

(d)

The weighted average number of diluted common shares used to compute FFO and Operating FFO applicable to diluted common shares includes OP Units, unvested restricted stock units and unvested restricted shares/units that are excluded from the computation of diluted EPS.

~~(a)~~

General and administrative expenses were reduced as a result of the reversal of previously accrued expenses associated with the termination of the prior Chief Operating Officer. As original estimated expenses were added back to operating FFO when recorded in 2016, the reversal of such expenses have been deducted from Operating FFO.

~~(b)~~

~~Includes redevelopment project costs expensed pursuant to GAAP such as certain demolition and lease termination costs.~~

~~(c)~~

~~Represents extinguishment of debt costs.~~

~~(d)~~

~~Represents costs directly associated with acquiring properties that are expensed pursuant to GAAP such as transfer taxes, brokerage fees and legal expenses.~~

~~(e)~~

The weighted average number of diluted common shares used to compute FFO and Operating FFO applicable to diluted common shares includes OP Units, unvested restricted stock units and unvested restricted shares that are excluded from the computation of diluted EPS.

Inflation, Deflation and Economic Condition Considerations

~~Inflation has been~~Prior to 2021, inflation was relatively low ~~in recent years (including our three most recent fiscal years)~~ and ~~has~~did not ~~had~~have a significant detrimental impact on the Company’s results of ~~operations. There have been mixed indications of an increase~~operations, however inflation substantially increased in ~~inflation in the U.S. economy.~~2022. If inflation rates continue to increase, substantially all of the Company’s tenant leases contain provisions designed to partially mitigate the negative impact of inflation in the near term. Such lease provisions include clauses that require tenants to reimburse the Company for inflation-sensitive costs such as real estate taxes, insurance and many of the operating expenses it incurs. Significant inflation rate increases over a prolonged period of time may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business. Conversely, deflation could lead to downward pressure on rents and other sources of income.

The efforts of the Federal Reserve to combat inflation have led to significant increases in interest rates. These increases could result in higher incremental borrowing costs for the Company and our tenants. The duration of our indebtedness and our relatively low exposure to floating rate debt have mitigated the direct impact of inflation and interest rate increases, the degree and pace of these changes have had and may continue to have impacts on our business.

~~Item 7A.~~

~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

One of the principal market risks facing the Company is the risk of interest rate ~~changes, primarily through its variable-rate revolving credit facility and term loans.~~changes. The Company’s objectives with respect to interest rate risk are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on operations and cash flows, and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, the Company may borrow at either fixed rates or at variable rates and enter into derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps, to mitigate its interest rate risk. The Company does not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes. The Company is not directly subject to foreign currency risk.

The Company has entered into forward interest rate swap agreements which convert the LIBOR rates to fixed rates for certain unsecured term loans. At December 31, 2019, the Company had $0.1 million included in deferred charges and other assets, net, in addition to $7.2 million included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet relating to the fair value of the interest rate swaps applicable to certain unsecured term loans.

At December 31, 2019, long-term debt consisted of a fixed-rate mortgage loan payable, a finance lease obligation, unsecured term loans, and the Company’s unsecured variable-rate credit facility. Excluding unamortized premiums and debt issuance costs, the average interest rate on the $477.3 million of fixed-rate debt outstanding was 3.6%, with maturities at various dates through 2050. The average interest rate on the $156.0 million of variable-rate debt outstanding, which consists of the unsecured revolving credit facility and a term loan, was 3.2%. With respect to the $156.0 million of variable-rate debt, if contractual interest rates either increase or decrease by 100 bps, the Company’s interest cost would increase or decrease respectively by approximately $1.6 million per annum.

With respect to the Company’s ~~fixed rate mortgage note and unsecured~~fixed-rate term loans, ~~with rates fixed through the use of derivative financial instruments,~~ changes in interest rates generally do not affect the Company’s interest expense as these ~~notes~~loans are at fixed rates for an extended ~~terms.~~term. Because the Company presently intends to hold its existing fixed-rate debt either to maturity or until the sale of the associated property, these fixed-rate ~~notes~~loans pose an interest rate risk to the Company’s results of operations and its working capital position only upon the refinancing of that indebtedness. The Company’s possible risk is from increases in long-term interest rates that may occur as this may increase the cost of refinancing maturing fixed-rate debt. In addition, the Company may incur prepayment penalties or defeasance costs when prepaying or defeasing debt.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

~~Item 8.~~

~~Financial Statements and Supplementary Data~~

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Cherry Bekaert LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, Auditor Firm ID: 677)		4134-35

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP, New York, New York, Auditor Firm ID: 42)		36

Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, ~~2019~~2022 and ~~2018~~2021		4237

Consolidated Statements of Operations, years ended December 31, ~~2019, 2018,~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017~~2020		4338

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), years ended December 31, ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017~~2020		4439

Consolidated Statements of Equity, years ended December 31, ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017~~2020		~~45-46~~40-41

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, years ended December 31, ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017~~2020		4742

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		~~48-68~~43

Schedule Filed As Part Of This Report
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, December 31, ~~2019~~2022		~~69-71~~66-67

All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is not present, is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

Report of Independent ~~Registered~~Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Virginia Beach, Virginia

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and schedule (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 2, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Evaluation of Real Estate for Impairment

Description of Matter

At December 31, 2022, the Company’s net real estate totaled $206.6 million. As more fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluates its investment properties for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of investment properties may not be recoverable. Management evaluates various qualitative factors in determining whether or not events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an investment property may not be recoverable.

Auditing the Company’s impairment assessment involved subjectivity due to the estimation required to assess significant assumptions utilized in estimating the recoverability of the investment properties based on undiscounted operating income and residual values, such as assumptions related to renewal and renegotiations of current leases, estimates of new leases on vacant spaces, and estimates of operating costs.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of internal controls over management’s impairment evaluation process. This included testing controls over management’s review of the estimated undiscounted cash flows, including the significant assumptions and data used to develop the cash flows. To test the Company’s evaluation of net real estate for impairment, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies applied, evaluating the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the analysis. We compared the recoverability calculated to the remaining net book value of the assets to ensure recoverability for the properties’ remaining useful lives. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to relevant market information and other applicable sources. As part of our evaluation, we performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the undiscounted cash flows of the related property that would result from changes in the assumptions.

/s/ Cherry Bekaert LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2022.

Virginia Beach, Virginia

March 2, 2023

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheets~~sheet of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. as of December 31, ~~2019 and 2018,~~2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the ~~three~~two years in the period ended December 31, ~~2019,~~2021, and the related notesand schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, ~~2019 and 2018,~~2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the ~~three~~two years in the period ended December 31, ~~2019,~~2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 13, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP~~

~~We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1984.~~

~~New York, New York~~

~~February 13, 2020~~

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor from 1984 to 2021

New York, New York

March 10, 2022

Except for Note 3, as to which the date is March 2, 2023

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	December 31,						December 31,
	2019			2018			2022			2021
ASSETS
Real estate:
Land	$	293,456,000		$	295,734,000		$	69,111,000		$	68,865,000
Buildings and improvements		1,221,750,000			1,212,948,000			294,999,000			300,962,000
		1,515,206,000			1,508,682,000			364,110,000			369,827,000
Less accumulated depreciation		(389,861,000	)		(361,969,000	)		(157,468,000	)		(155,250,000	)
Real estate, net		1,125,345,000			1,146,713,000			206,642,000			214,577,000

Real estate held for sale		13,230,000			11,592,000			—			757,037,000
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture								—			4,654,000
Cash and cash equivalents		2,747,000			1,977,000			3,899,000			3,039,000
Restricted cash								9,564,000			230,000
Receivables		22,164,000			21,977,000			6,135,000			13,580,000
Other assets and deferred charges, net		42,139,000			40,642,000			7,924,000			23,777,000
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,205,625,000		$	1,222,901,000		$	234,164,000		$	1,016,894,000

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Mortgage loan payable	$	46,370,000		$	47,315,000
Finance lease obligation		5,364,000			5,387,000
Mortgage loan payable - held for sale							$	—		$	156,821,000
Finance lease obligation - held for sale								—			5,314,000
Unsecured revolving credit facility		106,000,000			100,000,000			—			66,000,000
Unsecured term loans		472,841,000			472,132,000			—			298,903,000
Secured term loans, net								131,462,000			—
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		50,502,000			26,142,000			10,094,000			42,099,000
Due to Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.								7,328,000			—
Unamortized intangible lease liabilities		10,473,000			13,209,000			3,078,000			5,367,000
Unamortized intangible lease liabilities - held for sale								—			2,422,000
Total liabilities		691,550,000			664,185,000			151,962,000			576,926,000

Commitments and contingencies		-			-			—			—

Equity:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock		159,541,000			159,541,000			159,541,000			159,541,000
Common stock ($0.06 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 89,020,000 and 90,436,000 shares, issued and outstanding, respectively)		5,341,000			5,426,000
Treasury stock (3,068,000 and 2,971,000 shares, respectively, at cost)		(16,311,000	)		(16,572,000	)
Common stock ($0.06 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 13,718,000 and 13,658,000 shares, issued and outstanding, respectively)								823,000			820,000
Treasury stock (0 and 387,000 shares, respectively, at cost)								—			(13,266,000	)
Additional paid-in capital		872,724,000			875,565,000			868,323,000			881,009,000
Cumulative distributions in excess of net income		(503,725,000	)		(475,726,000	)		(946,485,000	)		(582,464,000	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(7,009,000	)		7,191,000
Accumulated other comprehensive loss								—			(8,258,000	)
Total Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. shareholders' equity		510,561,000			555,425,000			82,202,000			437,382,000
Noncontrolling interests:
Minority interests in consolidated joint ventures		435,000			(112,000	)
Limited partners' OP Units		3,079,000			3,403,000			—			2,586,000
Total noncontrolling interests		3,514,000			3,291,000			—			2,586,000
Total equity		514,075,000			558,716,000			82,202,000			439,968,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	1,205,625,000		$	1,222,901,000		$	234,164,000		$	1,016,894,000

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


	Years ended December 31,									Years ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			2022			2021			2020
REVENUES
Rental revenues	$	142,719,000		$	147,236,000		$	144,496,000		$	32,671,000		$	38,612,000		$	38,408,000
Other		1,364,000			4,784,000			1,512,000			1,334,000			575,000			7,482,000
Total revenues		144,083,000			152,020,000			146,008,000			34,005,000			39,187,000			45,890,000
EXPENSES
Operating, maintenance and management		27,593,000			27,771,000			24,752,000			8,119,000			7,299,000			4,234,000
Real estate and other property-related taxes		20,754,000			20,123,000			19,577,000			5,949,000			6,589,000			7,324,000
General and administrative		18,804,000			16,915,000			16,907,000			10,099,000			17,811,000			16,691,000
Acquisition pursuit costs		-			-			156,000
Depreciation and amortization		45,861,000			40,053,000			40,115,000			9,645,000			12,141,000			16,469,000
Total expenses		113,012,000			104,862,000			101,507,000			33,812,000			43,840,000			44,718,000

OTHER
Gain on sales		2,942,000			4,864,000			7,099,000			—			48,857,000			3,753,000
Transaction costs											(58,959,000	)		—			—
Impairment charges		(8,938,000	)		(20,689,000	)		(9,538,000	)		(9,350,000	)		(65,975,000	)		(7,607,000	)
Total other		(5,996,000	)		(15,825,000	)		(2,439,000	)		(68,309,000	)		(17,118,000	)		(3,854,000	)

OPERATING INCOME		25,075,000			31,333,000			42,062,000
OPERATING LOSS											(68,116,000	)		(21,771,000	)		(2,682,000	)

NON-OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest expense		(23,509,000	)		(22,146,000	)		(22,199,000	)
Early extinguishment of debt costs		-			(4,829,000	)		(210,000	)
Interest expense, net											(10,894,000	)		(13,901,000	)		(19,840,000	)
Total non-operating income and expenses		(23,509,000	)		(26,975,000	)		(22,409,000	)		(10,894,000	)		(13,901,000	)		(19,840,000	)

NET INCOME		1,566,000			4,358,000			19,653,000
NET LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS											(79,010,000	)		(35,672,000	)		(22,522,000	)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Income from discontinued operations											14,302,000			23,535,000			21,359,000
Impairment (charges) reversal											(16,629,000	)		(33,913,000	)		643,000
Gain on sales											125,500,000			1,047,000			—
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations											123,173,000			(9,331,000	)		22,002,000

NET INCOME (LOSS)											44,163,000			(45,003,000	)		(520,000	)

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Minority interests in consolidated joint ventures		(547,000	)		(497,000	)		(523,000	)		—			(425,000	)		(618,000	)
Limited partners' interest in Operating Partnership		57,000			28,000			13,000			(132,000	)		329,000			66,000
Total net (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		(490,000	)		(469,000	)		(510,000	)
Total net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests											(132,000	)		(96,000	)		(552,000	)

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.		1,076,000			3,889,000			19,143,000
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.											44,031,000			(45,099,000	)		(1,072,000	)

Preferred stock dividends		(10,752,000	)		(10,863,000	)		(13,652,000	)		(10,752,000	)		(10,752,000	)		(10,752,000	)
Preferred stock redemption costs		-			(3,507,000	)		(7,890,000	)

NET (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS	$	(9,676,000	)	$	(10,481,000	)	$	(2,399,000	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS										$	33,279,000		$	(55,851,000	)	$	(11,824,000	)

NET (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS (BASIC AND DILUTED):	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.04	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS (BASIC AND DILUTED):
Continuing operations										$	(6.64	)	$	(3.53	)	$	(2.59	)
Discontinued operations											9.12			(0.71	)		1.67
										$	2.48		$	(4.24	)	$	(0.92	)

Weighted average number of common shares - basic and diluted		86,341,000			88,420,000			84,168,000			13,448,000			13,213,000			13,104,000

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Net income

$
1,566,000

$
4,358,000

$
19,653,000

Other comprehensive income - unrealized (loss) gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges

(14,286,000
)

1,518,000

5,287,000

Comprehensive (loss) income

(12,720,000
)

5,876,000

24,940,000

Comprehensive (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests

(404,000
)

(490,000
)

(530,000
)

Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

$
(13,124,000
)

$
5,386,000

$
24,410,000


	Years ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020

Net income (loss)	$	44,163,000		$	(45,003,000	)	$	(520,000	)

Unrealized gain (loss) on change in fair value of cash flow hedges		8,321,000			10,624,000			(11,878,000	)

Comprehensive income (loss)		52,484,000			(34,379,000	)		(12,398,000	)

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(195,000	)		(162,000	)		(481,000	)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.	$	52,289,000		$	(34,541,000	)	$	(12,879,000	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years ended December 31, ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017~~2020

																			Cumulative			Accumulated
													Treasury			Additional			distributions			other																						Cumulative			Accumulated
	Preferred stock						Common stock						stock,			paid-in			in excess of			comprehensive																Treasury			Additional			distributions			other
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			at cost			capital			net income			income (loss)			Total			Preferred stock				Common stock						stock,			paid-in			in excess of			comprehensive
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2016		7,950,000		$	190,661,000			85,316,000		$	5,119,000		$	(18,129,000	)	$	829,526,000		$	(426,864,000	)	$	427,000		$	580,740,000
Net income		—			—			—			—			—			—			19,143,000			—			19,143,000
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			5,267,000			5,267,000
Share-based compensation, net		—			—			249,000			15,000			(334,000	)		3,832,000			—			—			3,513,000
Net proceeds from sales of Series C Shares		5,000,000			124,774,000			—			—			—			(4,342,000	)		—			—			120,432,000
Redemptions of Series B Shares		(4,500,000	)		(107,927,000	)		—			—			—			3,307,000			(7,890,000	)		—			(112,510,000	)
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses		—			—			5,752,000			345,000			—			42,821,000			—			—			43,166,000
Preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			—			—			—			(13,652,000	)		—			(13,652,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			(17,681,000	)		—			(17,681,000	)
Redemption of OP Units		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest		—			—			—			—			—			(82,000	)		—			—			(82,000	)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2017		8,450,000			207,508,000			91,317,000			5,479,000			(18,463,000	)		875,062,000			(446,944,000	)		5,694,000			628,336,000
Net (loss) income		—			—			—			—			—			—			3,889,000			—			3,889,000
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			1,497,000			1,497,000
Share-based compensation, net		—			—			(111,000	)		(7,000	)		1,891,000			1,467,000			—			—			3,351,000
Redemptions of Series B Shares		(2,000,000	)		(47,967,000	)		—			—			—			1,458,000			(3,507,000	)		—			(50,016,000	)
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses		—			—			2,000			—			—			9,000			—			—			9,000
Common stock repurchases		—			—			(772,000	)		(46,000	)		—			(2,283,000	)		—			—			(2,329,000	)
Preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			—			—			—			(10,863,000	)		—			(10,863,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			(18,301,000	)		—			(18,301,000	)
Redemption of OP Units		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Issuance of OP Units		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest		—			—			—			—			—			(148,000	)		—			—			(148,000	)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2018		6,450,000			159,541,000			90,436,000			5,426,000			(16,572,000	)		875,565,000			(475,726,000	)		7,191,000			555,425,000
Prior period adjustment - adoption of lease accounting standard		—			—			—			—			—			—			(515,000	)		—			(515,000	)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2018, RESTATED		6,450,000			159,541,000			90,436,000			5,426,000			(16,572,000	)		875,565,000			(476,241,000	)		7,191,000			554,910,000
																												Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			at cost			capital			net income			(income) loss			Total
Balance, December 31, 2019																													6,450,000	$	159,541,000		13,488,000		$	809,000		$	(16,311,000	)	$	877,256,000		$	(503,725,000	)	$	(7,009,000	)	$	510,561,000
Net (loss) income		—			—			—			—			—			—			1,076,000			—			1,076,000			—		—		—			—			—			—			(1,072,000	)		—			(1,072,000	)
Unrealized (loss) on change in fair value of cash flow hedges		—			—			—			—			—						—			(14,200,000	)		(14,200,000	)		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(11,807,000	)		(11,807,000	)
Share-based compensation, net		—			—			626,000			38,000			261,000			3,830,000			—			—			4,129,000			—		—		40,000			3,000			1,178,000			2,528,000			—			—			3,709,000
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses		—			—			8,000			—			—			23,000			—			—			23,000			—		—		2,000			—			—			13,000			—			—			13,000
Common stock repurchases		—			—			(2,050,000	)		(123,000	)		—			(6,721,000	)		—			—			(6,844,000	)
Preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			—			—			—			(10,752,000	)		—			(10,752,000	)		—		—		—			—			—			—			(10,752,000	)		—			(10,752,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			(17,808,000	)		—			(17,808,000	)		—		—		—			—			—			—			(7,147,000	)		—			(7,147,000	)
Redemption of OP Units		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest		—			—			—			—			—			27,000			—			—			27,000			—		—		—			—			—			(7,000	)		—			—			(7,000	)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2019		6,450,000			159,541,000			89,020,000			5,341,000			(16,311,000	)		872,724,000			(503,725,000	)		(7,009,000	)		510,561,000
Balance, December 31, 2020																													6,450,000		159,541,000		13,530,000			812,000			(15,133,000	)		879,790,000			(522,696,000	)		(18,816,000	)		483,498,000
Net (loss) income																													—		—		—			—			—			—			(45,099,000	)		—			(45,099,000	)
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges																													—		—		—			—			—			—			—			10,558,000			10,558,000
Share-based compensation, net																													—		—		128,000			8,000			1,867,000			(17,000	)		—			—			1,858,000
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses																													—		—		—			—			—			4,000			—			—			4,000
Preferred stock dividends																													—		—		—			—			—			—			(10,752,000	)		—			(10,752,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests																													—		—		—			—			—			—			(3,917,000	)		—			(3,917,000	)
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest																													—		—		—			—			—			30,000			—			—			30,000
Conversion of OP Units to shares																													—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Acquisition of minority interests																													—		—		—			—			—			1,202,000			—			—			1,202,000
Balance, December 31, 2021																													6,450,000		159,541,000		13,658,000			820,000			(13,266,000	)		881,009,000			(582,464,000	)		(8,258,000	)		437,382,000
Net income																													—		—		—			—			—			—			44,031,000			—			44,031,000
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges																													—		—		—			—			—			—			—			8,258,000			8,258,000
Share-based compensation, net																													—		—		(103,000	)		(6,000	)		13,266,000			(12,300,000	)		—			—			960,000
Purchase of OP Units																													—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Preferred stock dividends																													—		—		—			—			—			—			(10,752,000	)		—			(10,752,000	)
Acquisition of minority interests																													—		—		—			—			—			(1,000,000	)		—			—			(1,000,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests																													—		—		—			—			—			—			(397,300,000	)		—			(397,300,000	)
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest																													—		—		—			—			—			622,000			—			—			622,000
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses																													—		—		—			—			—			1,000			—			—			1,000
Common stock issuance																													—		—		114,000			7,000			—			(7,000	)		—			—			—
Common stock repurchases																													—		—		(13,669,000	)		(821,000	)		—			821,000			—			—			—
Common stock issued to Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.																													—		—		13,718,000			823,000			—			(823,000	)		—			—			—
Balance, December 31, 2022																													6,450,000	$	159,541,000		13,718,000		$	823,000		$	—		$	868,323,000		$	(946,485,000	)	$	—		$	82,202,000

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years ended December 31, ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017~~2020

Continued

	Noncontrolling Interests
	Minority												Noncontrolling Interests
	interests in			Limited												Limited
	consolidated			partners'						Total			Minority			partners'
	joint ventures			OP Units			Total			equity			interests in			interest in
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2016	$	(1,132,000	)	$	2,389,000		$	1,257,000		$	581,997,000
Net income		523,000			(13,000	)		510,000			19,653,000
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges		—			20,000			20,000			5,287,000
Share-based compensation, net		—			—			—			3,513,000
Net proceeds from sales of Series C Shares		—			—			—			120,432,000
Redemptions of Series B Shares		—			—			—			(112,510,000	)
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses		—			—			—			43,166,000
Preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			(13,652,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests		—			(70,000	)		(70,000	)		(17,751,000	)
Redemption of OP Units		—			(24,000	)		(24,000	)		(24,000	)
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest		—			82,000			82,000			—
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2017		(609,000	)		2,384,000			1,775,000			630,111,000
Net (loss) income		497,000			(28,000	)		469,000			4,358,000
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges		—			21,000			21,000			1,518,000
Share-based compensation, net		—			—			—			3,351,000
Redemptions of Series B Shares		—			—			—			(50,016,000	)
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses		—			—			—			9,000
Common stock repurchases		—			—			—			(2,329,000	)
Preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			(10,863,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests		—			(90,000	)		(90,000	)		(18,391,000	)
Redemption of OP Units		—			(7,000	)		(7,000	)		(7,000	)
Issuance of OP Units		—			975,000			975,000			975,000
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest		—			148,000			148,000			—
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2018		(112,000	)		3,403,000			3,291,000			558,716,000
Prior period adjustment - adoption of lease accounting standard		—			—			—			(515,000	)
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2018, RESTATED		(112,000	)		3,403,000			3,291,000			558,201,000
													consolidated			Operating						Total
													joint ventures			Partnership			Total			equity
Balance, December 31, 2019													$	435,000		$	3,079,000		$	3,514,000		$	514,075,000
Net (loss) income		547,000			(57,000	)		490,000			1,566,000			618,000			(66,000	)		552,000			(520,000	)
Unrealized (loss) on change in fair value of cash flow hedges		—			(86,000	)		(86,000	)		(14,286,000	)		—			(71,000	)		(71,000	)		(11,878,000	)
Share-based compensation, net		—			—			—			4,129,000			—			—			—			3,709,000
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses		—			—			—			23,000			—			—			—			13,000
Common stock repurchases		—			—			—			(6,844,000	)
Preferred stock dividends		—			—			—			(10,752,000	)		—			—			—			(10,752,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests		—			(111,000	)		(111,000	)		(17,919,000	)		—			(42,000	)		(42,000	)		(7,189,000	)
Redemption of OP Units		—			(43,000	)		(43,000	)		(43,000	)
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest		—			(27,000	)		(27,000	)		—			—			7,000			7,000			—
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2019	$	435,000		$	3,079,000		$	3,514,000		$	514,075,000
Balance, December 31, 2020														1,053,000			2,907,000			3,960,000			487,458,000
Net (loss) income														425,000			(329,000	)		96,000			(45,003,000	)
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges														—			66,000			66,000			10,624,000
Share-based compensation, net														—			—			—			1,858,000
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses														—			—			—			4,000
Preferred stock dividends														—			—			—			(10,752,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests														—			(20,000	)		(20,000	)		(3,937,000	)
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest														—			(30,000	)		(30,000	)		—
Conversion of OP Units to shares														—			(8,000	)		(8,000	)		(8,000	)
Acquisition of minority interests														(1,478,000	)		—			(1,478,000	)		(276,000	)
Balance, December 31, 2021														—			2,586,000			2,586,000			439,968,000
Net income														—			132,000			132,000			44,163,000
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges														—			63,000			63,000			8,321,000
Share-based compensation, net														—			—			—			960,000
Purchase of OP Units														—			(726,000	)		(726,000	)		(726,000	)
Preferred stock dividends														—			—			—			(10,752,000	)
Acquisition of minority interests														—			—			—			(1,000,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders/noncontrolling interests														—			(1,433,000	)		(1,433,000	)		(398,733,000	)
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest														—			(622,000	)		(622,000	)		—
Common stock sales, net of issuance expenses														—			—			—			1,000
Common stock issuance														—			—			—			—
Common stock repurchases														—			—			—			—
Common stock issued to Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.														—			—			—			—
Balance, December 31, 2022													$	—		$	—		$	—		$	82,202,000

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	Years ended December 31,									Years ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			2022			2021			2020
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	1,566,000		$	4,358,000		$	19,653,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income (loss)										$	44,163,000		$	(45,003,000	)	$	(520,000	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales		(2,942,000	)		(4,864,000	)		(7,099,000	)		(125,500,000	)		(49,904,000	)		(4,396,000	)
Impairment charges		8,938,000			20,689,000			9,538,000			25,979,000			99,888,000			7,607,000
Early extinguishment of debt costs		—			4,829,000			210,000
Straight-line rents and expenses, net		(265,000	)		(1,142,000	)		(864,000	)		(506,000	)		(161,000	)		1,279,000
Provision for doubtful accounts		412,000			2,273,000			1,715,000			968,000			1,114,000			1,478,000
Depreciation and amortization		45,861,000			40,053,000			40,115,000			19,372,000			39,454,000			48,412,000
Amortization of intangible lease liabilities, net		(2,827,000	)		(4,361,000	)		(2,518,000	)		(1,080,000	)		(1,074,000	)		(1,373,000	)
Expense relating to share-based compensation, net		4,117,000			3,763,000			3,552,000			1,608,000			3,043,000			3,723,000
Amortization of premium on mortgage loan payable		—			(80,000	)		(130,000	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,286,000			1,224,000			1,325,000			6,105,000			1,360,000			1,331,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions:
Rents and other receivables		(812,000	)		(3,902,000	)		(3,467,000	)		(15,575,000	)		(1,266,000	)		(2,811,000	)
Prepaid expenses and other		(3,037,000	)		(6,591,000	)		(4,600,000	)		(5,654,000	)		(2,709,000	)		(9,216,000	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,378,000			1,651,000			(337,000	)		29,656,000			220,000			(2,934,000	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		53,675,000			57,900,000			57,093,000
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities											(20,464,000	)		44,962,000			42,580,000

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of real estate		(9,083,000	)		(179,000	)		(32,442,000	)
Expenditures for real estate improvements		(31,910,000	)		(30,377,000	)		(25,561,000	)		(22,407,000	)		(28,309,000	)		(39,551,000	)
Net proceeds from sales of real estate		18,651,000			19,118,000			12,506,000			699,337,000			104,497,000			21,182,000
Issuance of mortgage note receivable		—			(3,500,000	)		—
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(22,342,000	)		(14,938,000	)		(45,497,000	)
Contributions to unconsolidated joint venture											(155,000	)		(4,654,000	)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities											676,775,000			71,534,000			(18,369,000	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repayments under revolving credit facility		(21,000,000	)		(123,500,000	)		(185,500,000	)		(70,000,000	)		(188,000,000	)		(104,000,000	)
Advances under revolving credit facility		27,000,000			168,500,000			168,500,000			4,000,000			79,000,000			173,000,000
Advance under term loan		—			75,000,000			—
Mortgage repayments		(1,027,000	)		(80,330,000	)		(10,294,000	)
Payment of early extinguishment of debt costs		—			(5,159,000	)		—
Repayment of term notes											(300,000,000	)		(100,000,000	)		(75,000,000	)
Proceeds (termination payment) related to interest rate swap											3,400,000			(503,000	)		—
Term loans and mortgage proceeds											265,000,000			114,000,000			—
Term loan and mortgage repayments											(130,664,000	)		(1,110,000	)		(1,067,000	)
Payments of debt financing costs		—			(705,000	)		(2,502,000	)		(7,368,000	)		(3,278,000	)		(326,000	)
Noncontrolling interests:
Purchase of minority interest											—			(276,000	)		—
Distributions to limited partners		(111,000	)		(90,000	)		(70,000	)		(966,000	)		(20,000	)		(42,000	)
Redemption of OP Units		(43,000	)		(7,000	)		(24,000	)
Net proceeds from sale of preferred stock		—			—			120,432,000
Redemptions of preferred stock		—			(50,016,000	)		(112,510,000	)
Acquisition of joint venture minority interest share											(1,000,000	)		—			—
Redemption of OP units											(467,000	)		(8,000	)		—
Common stock sales less issuance expenses, net		22,000			9,000			43,166,000			—			—			13,000
Common stock repurchases		(6,844,000	)		(2,329,000	)		—
Preferred stock dividends		(10,752,000	)		(11,276,000	)		(13,656,000	)		(10,752,000	)		(10,752,000	)		(10,752,000	)
Distributions to common shareholders		(17,808,000	)		(18,301,000	)		(17,681,000	)		(397,300,000	)		(3,917,000	)		(7,147,000	)
Net cash (used in) financing activities		(30,563,000	)		(48,204,000	)		(10,139,000	)
Net cash used in financing activities											(646,117,000	)		(114,864,000	)		(25,321,000	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		770,000			(5,242,000	)		1,457,000			10,194,000			1,632,000			(1,110,000	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year		1,977,000			7,219,000			5,762,000			3,269,000			1,637,000			2,747,000
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year	$	2,747,000		$	1,977,000		$	7,219,000		$	13,463,000		$	3,269,000		$	1,637,000

Reconciliation to consolidated balance sheets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,747,000		$	1,977,000		$	3,702,000		$	3,899,000		$	3,039,000		$	1,637,000
Restricted cash		—			—			3,517,000			9,564,000			230,000			—
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	2,747,000		$	1,977,000		$	7,219,000		$	13,463,000		$	3,269,000		$	1,637,000

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2019~~2022

Note 1. Business and ~~Organization~~Organization

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. (the ~~"Company"~~“Company”) is a real estate investment trust ~~("REIT"~~(“REIT”) that focuses ~~primarily~~ on ~~ownership, operation~~owning and ~~redevelopment of~~operating income producing retail properties with a primary focus on grocery-anchored shopping centers primarily in ~~high-density urban markets from Washington, D.C.~~the Northeast.

The Company, organized as a Maryland corporation, has established an umbrella partnership structure through the contribution of substantially all of its assets to ~~Boston. At December 31, 2019, the Company owned and managed a portfolio of 56 operating properties (excluding properties “held for sale”).~~

Cedar Realty Trust Partnership L.P. (the ~~"Operating Partnership"~~“Operating Partnership”) is, organized as a limited partnership under the ~~entity through which the~~laws of Delaware. The Company conducts substantially all of its business ~~and owns (either directly or~~ through ~~subsidiaries) substantially all~~the Operating Partnership. Prior to consummation of ~~its assets.~~the Transactions described below, the Operating Partnership had limited partners other than the Company, but their limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership were canceled pursuant to the Merger Agreement, as described below. At December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, the Company owned a ~~99.4%~~100.0% general and limited partnership interest in, and was the sole general partner of, the Operating ~~Partnership. The limited partners’ interest in the Operating~~ Partnership ~~(0.6% at December 31, 2019)~~and is ~~represented by partnership units in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”). The carrying amount~~a wholly-owned subsidiary of such interest is adjusted at the end of each reporting period to an amount equal to the limited partners’ ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership’s net equity. The 537,000 OP Units are economically equivalent to the Company’s common stock. The holders of OP Units have the right to exchange their OP Units for the same number of shares of the Company’s common stock or, at the Company’s option, for cash. Unless specifically noted otherwise, all references to OP Units exclude limited partnership units held by the Company.WHLR.

As used herein, the "Company" refers to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, including the Operating Partnership or, where the context so requires, Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. only.

Asset Sale and Merger

On March 2, 2022, the Company announced that following its previously announced review of strategic alternatives, it had entered into definitive agreements for the sale of the Company and its assets in a series of related all-cash transactions. Specifically, on March 2, 2022, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into an asset purchase and sale agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with DRA Fund X-B LLC and KPR Centers LLC (together with their respective designees, the “Grocery-Anchored Purchasers”) for the sale of a portfolio of 33 grocery-anchored shopping centers for cash (the “Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale”). In addition, on March 2, 2022, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with WHLR and certain of its affiliates pursuant to which, following closing of the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale, WHLR would acquire the balance of the Company’s shopping center assets by way of an all-cash merger transaction (the “Merger”).

The transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Merger Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Transactions”. The Transactions were unanimously approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and were approved by the Company’s common stockholders at a special meeting of stockholders held on May 27, 2022.

On July 7, 2022, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries completed the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and the East River Park and Senator Square redevelopment asset sales for total gross proceeds of approximately $879 million, including the assumed debt. There were no material relationships among the Company, the Grocery-Anchored Purchasers, or any of their respective affiliates. On August 22, 2022, the Company completed the Merger. Each outstanding share of common stock of the Company and outstanding common unit of the Operating Partnership held by persons other than the Company immediately prior to the Merger were canceled and converted into the right to receive a cash payment of $9.48 per share or unit. As a result of the Merger, WHLR acquired all of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, which ceased to be publicly traded on the NYSE. The Company's outstanding 7.25% Series B Preferred Stock and 6.50% Series C Preferred Stock remain outstanding and continue to trade on the NYSE. In addition, prior to consummation of the Merger, the Company's Board of Directors declared a special dividend on shares of the Company's outstanding common stock and OP Units of $19.52 per share, payable to holders of record of the Company's common stock and OP Units at the close of business on August 19, 2022.

In connection with the transactions discussed above, the Company incurred transaction costs of $59.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, of which $33.5 million relates to employee severance payments.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Reverse Stock Split

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2022

the Operating Partnership. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), all shares of common stock, restricted stock units, Operating Partnership Units (“OP Units”) and per share/unit information that are presented in this Form 10-K were adjusted to reflect the reverse split on a retroactive basis for all periods presented.

Principles of Consolidation/Basis of Preparation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company, the Operating Partnership, its subsidiaries, and certain joint venture partnerships in which it participates. The Company consolidates all variable interest entities (“VIEs”) for which it is the primary beneficiary. Generally, a VIE is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (1) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk (a) lack the power through voting or similar rights to make decisions about the entity’s activities that significantly impact the entity’s performance, (b) have no obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (c) have no right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately fewer voting rights. A VIE is required to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE has (1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Significant judgments related to these determinations include estimates about the current ~~and future fair~~ values, performance of real estate held by these VIEs, and general market conditions.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance which amended the consolidation requirements, including introducing a separate consolidation analysis specific to limited partnerships and other similar entities. Under the analysis, limited partnerships and other similar entities will be considered variable interest entities unless the limited partners hold substantive kick-out rights or participating rights. The guidance was adopted on January 1, 2016. The Company ~~evaluated its existing joint venture property at San Souci Plaza based on the new guidance, determined the entity to be~~had a ~~variable interest entity, and continued to consolidate the entity. At December 31, 2019, this VIE owned real estate with a carrying value of $26.2 million and no mortgage loan payable.~~

~~The Company has a 60%~~60%-owned joint venture originally formed to develop the project known as Crossroads II. This joint venture iswas consolidated as it iswas deemed to be a VIE and the Company iswas the primary beneficiary. The Company (1) guaranteed all related debt, (2) ~~does~~did not require its partners to fund additional capital requirements, (3) ~~has~~had an economic interest greater than its voting proportion and (4) ~~directs~~directed the management activities that significantly ~~impact~~impacted the performance of the joint venture. At December 31, ~~2019,~~2021, this VIE owned real estate with a carrying value of ~~$37.6~~$36.2 million and no mortgage loan payable.

On June 28, 2022, the Company acquired the 40% minority ownership interest percentage in Crossroads II and the Company's ownership interest in Crossroads II was included in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale that occurred on July 7, 2022.

The accompanying financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis in accordance with ~~accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”),~~GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported

~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~December 31, 2019~~

amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods covered by the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Real Estate Investments

Real estate investments are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. The provision for depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the respective assets of between 3 and 40 years, with buildings being depreciated at the upper end of the range. Depreciation expense, net of discontinued operations, amounted to ~~$41.8~~$8.5 million, ~~$36.1~~$11.1 million and ~~$36.5~~$15.2 million for ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017,~~2020, respectively. Expenditures for betterments that substantially extend the useful lives of the assets are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs, and betterments that do not substantially prolong the normal useful life of an asset are charged to operations as incurred.

Real estate investments include costs of development and redevelopment activities, and construction in progress. Capitalized costs, including interest and other carrying costs during the construction and/or renovation periods, are included in the cost of the related asset and charged to operations through depreciation over the asset’s estimated useful life. A variety of costs are incurred in the development and leasing of a property, such as pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs, and other costs incurred during the period of development. After a determination is made to capitalize a cost, it is allocated to the specific component of a project that is benefited. The Company ceases capitalization on the portions substantially completed and occupied, or held available for occupancy, and capitalizes only those costs associated with the portions under development. The Company considers a construction project to be substantially completed and

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2022

held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but not later than one year from cessation of major construction activity.

The Company allocates the fair value of real estate acquired to land, buildings and improvements. In addition, the fair value of in-place leases is allocated to intangible lease assets and liabilities. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, which value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements based on management’s determination of the fair values of these assets. In valuing an acquired property’s intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, such as real estate taxes, insurance, other operating expenses, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on its evaluation of current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs.

The values of acquired above-market and below-market leases are recorded based on the present values (using discount rates which reflect the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the differences between the contractual amounts to be received and management’s estimate of market lease rates, measured over the terms of the respective leases that management deemed appropriate at the time of the acquisitions. Such valuations include consideration of the ~~non-cancellable~~non-cancelable terms of the respective leases as well as any applicable renewal periods. The fair values associated with below-market rental renewal options are determined based on the Company’s experience and the relevant facts and circumstances that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The values of above-market leases are amortized to rental income over the terms of the respective non-cancelable lease periods. The portion of the values of below-market leases associated with the original non-cancelable lease terms are amortized to rental income over the terms of the respective non-cancelable lease periods. The portion of the values of the leases associated with below-market renewal options that are likely of exercise are amortized to rental income over the respective renewal periods. The value of other intangible assets (including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, etc.) is amortized to expense over the applicable terms of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recognized in operations at that time.

Properties Held for Sale

~~Effective January 1, 2018, the~~The Company may decide to sell properties that are held for use. The Company records these properties as held for sale when management has ~~adopted the guidance on gains and losses from the derecognition of nonfinancial assets. This guidance~~ ~~applies to all nonfinancial assets (including real estate) for which the counterparty is not a customer and also~~

~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~December 31, 2019~~

~~clarifies that all businesses are derecognized using the deconsolidation guidance. Additionally, it defines an in substance nonfinancial asset as a financial asset that is promised~~committed to a ~~counterparty in~~plan to sell the assets, actively seeks a ~~contract in which substantially all~~buyer for the assets, and the consummation of the ~~fair value of the asset promised in the contract~~sale is ~~concentrated in nonfinancial assets, which excludes cash or cash equivalents~~considered probable and ~~liabilities.~~ The Company believes these criteria for all real estate sold were met during 2019 and 2018. Under prior guidance, sales of real estate were recognized only when sufficient down payments had been obtained, possession and other attributes of ownership had been transferred to the buyer and the Company had no significant continuing involvement. The Company believes these criteria were met for all real estate sold during 2017.is expected within one year.

~~Properties Held For Sale~~

The Company follows the guidance for reporting discontinued operations, whereby a disposal of an individual property or group of properties is required to be reported in “discontinued operations” only if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. The results of operations for those properties not meeting such criteria are reported in “continuing operations” in the consolidated statements of operations.

The carrying values of the assets and liabilities of properties determined to be held for sale, principally the net book values of the real estate and the related mortgage loans payable expected to be assumed by the buyers, are reclassified as “held for sale” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at the time such determinations are made, on a prospective basis only. ~~In addition, the Company anticipates that sales of all such properties remaining classified as “held for sale” at the balance sheet date will be concluded within one year from such date.~~

The Company, when applicable, conducts a continuing review of the values for all properties “held for sale” based on final sales prices and sales contracts entered into. Impairment charges/reversals, if applicable, are based on a comparison of the carrying values of the properties with either (1) actual sales prices less costs to sell for properties sold, or contract amounts less costs to sell for properties in the process of being sold, (2) estimated sales prices, less costs to sell, based on discounted cash flow analyses, if no contract amounts are being negotiated (see Note 4, ~~- “Fair~~Fair Value ~~Measurements”)~~Measurements), or (3) with respect to land parcels, estimated sales prices, less costs to sell, based on comparable sales completed in the selected market areas. Prior to the Company’s determination to dispose of properties, which are subsequently reclassified to “held for sale”, the Company performed recoverability analyses based on the estimated undiscounted cash flows that were expected to result from the real estate investments’ use and eventual disposal. The projected undiscounted cash flows of each property reflects that the carrying value of each real estate investment would be recovered. However, as a result of the properties’ meeting the “held for sale” criteria, such properties were written down to the lower of their carrying value and estimated fair values less costs to sell.

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2022

Cash and Cash Equivalents / Restricted Cash

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks and short-term investments with original maturities when purchased of less than ninety days, and include cash at a consolidated joint ~~ventures~~venture of ~~$0.3~~$0.0 million and ~~$0.2~~$0.2 million at December 31, ~~2019~~2022 and ~~2018,~~2021, respectively.

The terms of ~~mortgage~~the secured term loans ~~payable~~ may require the Company to deposit certain replacement and other reserves with its lenders. Such “restricted cash” is generally available only for property-level requirements for which the reserves have been established. Restricted cash represents amounts held by lenders for real estate taxes, insurance, reserves for capital improvements, leasing costs and tenant security deposits.

Fair Value Measurements

The accounting guidance for fair value measurement establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels:

•

Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

•

Level 2 – Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

•

Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~December 31, 2019~~

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible while also considering counterparty credit risk in the assessment of fair value.

Revenue Recognition and Receivables

~~Management has determined that~~The Company's underlying assets relating to rental revenue activity is solely retail space. The Company retains substantially all of the ~~Company’s~~risks and benefits of ownership of these underlying assets and accounts for these leases ~~with its various tenants are~~as operating leases. The Company combines lease and nonlease components in lease contracts, which includes combining base rent and tenant reimbursement revenue.

Rental income with scheduled rent increases is recognized using the straight-line method over the respective non-cancelable terms of the leases. The aggregate excess of rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual base rents is included in receivables on the consolidated balance sheet. Leases also generally contain provisions under which the tenants reimburse the Company for a portion of property operating expenses and real estate taxes incurred, generally attributable to their respective allocable portions of gross leasable area. Such income is recognized in the periods earned. In addition, a limited number of operating leases contain contingent rent provisions under which tenants are required to pay, as additional rent, a percentage of their sales in excess of a specified amount.

The Company’s leases generally require the tenant to reimburse the Company for a substantial portion of its expenses incurred in operating, maintaining, repairing, insuring and managing the shopping center and common areas (collectively defined as Common Area Maintenance or “CAM” expenses). This significantly reduces the Company’s exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation or other outside factors. These reimbursements are considered nonlease components which the Company combines with the lease component. The Company calculates the tenant’s share of operating costs by multiplying the total amount of the operating costs by the tenant's pro-rata percentage of square footage to total square footage of the property. The Company also receives monthly payments for these reimbursements from substantially all its tenants throughout the year. The Company recognizes tenant reimbursements as variable lease income.

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2022

The Company defers recognition of contingent rental income until those specified sales targets are met. Revenues also include items such as lease termination fees, which tend to fluctuate more than rents from year to year. Termination fees are fees that the Company has agreed to accept in consideration for permitting certain tenants to terminate their lease prior to the contractual expiration. The Company recognizes lease termination ~~income when~~fees, which are included in revenues on the ~~following conditions are met: (1)~~consolidated statements of operations, in the year that the lease ~~termination agreement has been executed, (2)~~is terminated and collection of the fee is reasonably assured. Upon early lease termination, ~~fee is determinable, (3) all~~ the ~~Company’s landlord services pursuant~~Company records losses related to ~~the terminated lease have been rendered,~~unrecovered intangibles and ~~(4) collectability of the lease termination fee is assured.~~other assets.

In November 2018, the FASB clarified the existing accounting treatment relating to receivables arising from operating leases, stating that such receivables are not within the scope of the expected credit loss standard and that impairment of receivables arising from operating leases should be accounted for in accordance with the recently-adopted lease accounting standard. This required the Company, as of January 1, 2019, to review its existing lease portfolio to determine if all future lease payments are probable of collection and, if the Company determined that all future lease payments are not probable of collection, the Company will account for these leases on a cash basis. This required that all amounts that were historically recorded as bad debt expense, and previously included in operating expenses in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations, now be recorded as a direct reduction of rental revenues. ~~Prior~~In accordance with this guidance, $4.1 million of rental revenue relating to ~~January 1, 2019,~~certain leases that were no longer deemed probable of collection were not recorded as rental revenue for the ~~Company made estimates~~year ended December 31, 2020. Of this amount, $0.7 million represented deferred rent receivables that were written-off for the year ended December 31, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2021, $(0.2) million of rental revenue previously removed from rental revenue was recovered and recorded as rental revenue. Of this amount, there were no deferred rent receivables that were written-off for the year ended December 31, 2021. For the year ended December 31, 2022, there was no rental revenue relating to certain leases that were no longer deemed probable of collection. $(0.3) million of deferred rent receivables that were previously written-off were recovered for the collectability of its accounts receivable related to base rent, straight-line rent, percentage rent, expense reimbursements and other revenues. When management analyzed accounts receivable and evaluated the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, it considered such things as historical bad debts, tenant creditworthiness, current economic trends, current developments relevant to a tenant’s business specifically and to its business category generally, and changes in tenants’ payment patterns.year ended December 31, 2022. The allowance for doubtful accounts was ~~$5.6~~$2.0 million and ~~$5.9~~$1.0 million at December 31, ~~2019~~2022 and ~~2018,~~2021, respectively. The provision for doubtful accounts (included in operating, maintenance and management expenses) was ~~$0.4~~$(0.3) million, ~~$2.2~~$(0.6) million and ~~$1.7~~$(3.9) million in ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017,~~2020, respectively.

Segment Information

The Company’s primary business is the ownership and operation of grocery-anchored shopping ~~centers~~.centers. The Company reviews operating and financial information for each property on an individual basis and, accordingly, each property represents an individual operating segment. The Company evaluates financial performance using property operating income, which consists of rental income and other property income, less operating expenses and real estate taxes. NoFor the year ended December 31, 2022, one property constitutes approximately 15.8% of the Company's revenues and no other individual property constitutes more than 10% of the Company’s revenues or property operating ~~income, and the~~income. The Company has no operations outside of the United States of America. Therefore, the Company has aggregated its properties into one reportable segment as the properties share similar long-term economic characteristics and have other similarities including the fact that they are operated using consistent business strategies, are typically located in major metropolitan areas, and have similar tenant mixes.

Lease Commitments

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases, in which the Company is the lessee, are included in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and the lease liabilities represent the Company's obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU assets include any lease payments made and excludes lease

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2022

incentives. The Company's lease terms may include options to extend the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company elects the practical expedient to combine lease and associated nonlease components. The lease components are the majority of its leasing arrangements and the Company accounts for the combined component as an operating lease. In the event the Company modifies existing ground leases or enters into new ground leases, such leases may be classified as finance leases.

Transaction Costs

All costs associated with the Company's strategic alternatives process, including the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and the Merger, were expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes

The Company, organized in 1984, has elected to be taxed as a ~~REIT~~real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). A REIT will generally not be subject to federal income taxation on that portion of its income that qualifies as REIT taxable income, to the extent that it distributes at least 90% of such REIT taxable income to its ~~shareholders~~stockholders and complies with certain other requirements. As of December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, the Company was in compliance with all REIT requirements.

The Company follows a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain federal, state and local tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained

~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~December 31, 2019~~

upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more-likely-than-not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions which would require an accrual.

Derivative Financial Instruments

~~The~~Prior to its merger with WHLR, the Company occasionally ~~utilizes~~utilized derivative financial instruments, principally interest rate swaps, to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. The Company ~~has~~had established policies and procedures for risk assessment, and the approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments ~~must~~had to be effective in reducing the Company’s interest rate risk exposure in order to qualify for hedge accounting. When the terms of an underlying transaction ~~are~~were modified, or when the underlying hedged item ~~ceases~~ceased to exist, all changes in the fair value of the instrument ~~are~~were marked-to-market with changes in value included in net income for each period until the derivative financial instrument ~~matures~~matured or iswas settled. Any derivative financial instrument used for risk management that ~~does~~did not meet the hedging criteria iswas marked-to-market with the changes in value included in net income. The Company has not entered into, and does not plan to enter into, derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Share-Based Compensation

During 2017, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”), which replaced the Company’s 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”). As of the effective date of the 2017 Plan, the Company may not grant any further awards under the 2012 Plan. The 2017 Plan establishes the procedures for the granting of, among other things, restricted stock awards. On May 1, 2019, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the 2017 Plan, which increased the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued pursuant to the 2017 Plan by ~~2.0 million~~303,000 shares, to a new total of ~~6.0 million~~909,000 shares (see Note 14, ~~– “Share-Based Compensation”)~~Share-Based Compensation), and the maximum number of shares that may be granted to a participant in any calendar year may not exceed ~~500,000.~~76,000. All grants issued pursuant to the 2017 Plan generally vest (1) at the end of designated time periods for time-based grants, or (2) upon the completion of a designated period of performance for performance-based grants and satisfaction of performance criteria. Time–based grants are valued according to the market price for the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. For performance-based grants, the Company generally engages an independent appraisal company to determine the value of the shares at the date of grant, taking into account the underlying contingency risks associated with the performance criteria. The value of all grants are being expensed on a straight-line basis over their respective vesting periods (irrespective of achievement of the market performance-based grants) adjusted, as applicable, for forfeitures. For restricted share grants subject to graded vesting, the amounts expensed are at least equal to the measured expense of each vested tranche. Based on the terms of the 2017 Plan, those grants of restricted

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2022

shares that are contributed to the Rabbi Trusts are classified as treasury stock on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The 2017 Plan was terminated in connection with the merger with WHLR.

Supplemental Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Information


	Years ended December 31,
	2022			2021		2020
Supplemental disclosure of cash activities:
Cash paid for interest	$	14,344,000		$	20,219,000	$	23,208,000
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:
Capitalization of interest and financing costs		1,035,000			3,399,000		2,674,000
Buildings and improvements included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(4,062,000	)		871,000		2,976,000
Recognition of right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities		—			—		703,000
Payoff of mortgages through mortgage assumptions		157,925,000			—		—

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

2017

Supplemental disclosure of cash activities:

Cash paid for interest

$
23,859,000

$
22,191,000

$
21,359,000

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:

Capitalization of interest and financing costs

1,649,000

1,528,000

684,000

Recognition of right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities

13,778,000

—

—

Issuance of OP Units in connection with a land parcel acquisition

—

975,000

—

~~Recently-Adopted~~Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance which amends the accounting for revenue recognition. Under the amended guidance, an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled to and receive in exchange for those goods or services. Leases are specifically excluded from this guidance and will be governed by the applicable lease codification. The guidance, effective January 1, 2018, did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~December 31, 2019~~

In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance which amends the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows, and the policy election with respect to accounting for forfeitures either as they occur or by estimating forfeitures. The guidance was adopted on January 1, 2017. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur, and the guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance that clarifies how an entity should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on its statement of cash flows. The guidance established that an entity will classify cash payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs as financing cash flows. In addition, the guidance provides entities with an alternative to consider regarding the nature of the source of distributions that an investor receives from an equity method investment when classifying distributions received in its cash flow statement (the nature of the distribution approach). Alternatively, entities can elect to classify the distributions received from equity method investees based on the cumulative earnings approach. The guidance, effective January 1, 2018, did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued guidance that requires entities to show the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related captions on the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. The guidance, effective January 1, 2018, did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued guidance which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset and/or a group of similar identifiable assets; if these criteria are met, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance also requires a business to include at least one substantive process and narrows the definition of outputs by more closely aligning it with how outputs are described in the guidance on revenue from contracts with customers. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption being permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2017. The Company believes that most of its typical acquisitions of real estate will not meet the new definition of a business, and accordingly, will result in the capitalization of associated acquisition pursuit costs, as is the case regarding all acquisitions in 2017.

In May 2017, the FASB issued guidance which clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification. Under the new guidance, an entity will not apply modification accounting if the award’s fair value, vesting conditions, and the classification of the award as equity or a liability are the same immediately before and after the change. The guidance, effective January 1, 2018, did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance amending the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The guidance, effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018, requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase of the leased asset by the lessee. This classification will determine whether the lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. ~~The Company is not required to reassess the classification of existing ground leases where it is the lessee and therefore these leases will continue to be accounted for as operating leases.~~ A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of twelve months or less continue to be accounted for pursuant to existing guidance for operating leases. Based on the Company’s future obligations under its ground lease and executive office lease agreements for which the Company is the lessee, the newly adopted guidance resulted in the recognition of (1) right-of-use assets of $14.6 million included in other assets and deferred charges, net, and (2) right-of-use liabilities of $14.6 million included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019. ~~In the event the Company modifies existing ground leases or enters into new ground leases after adoption of the new standard, such leases may be classified as finance leases~~. Additionally, the guidance requires that lessees and lessors capitalize, as initial direct costs, only those costs that are incurred due to the execution of a lease. Under this guidance, allocated payroll costs and other costs that are incurred regardless of whether the lease is obtained will no longer be capitalized as initial direct costs and instead will be expensed as incurred. During 2019, the Company expensed $2.8 million of leasing costs which would have previously been capitalized.

~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~December 31, 2019~~

The FASB provided lessors with a practical expedient, elected by class of underlying asset, to account for lease and non-lease components as a single lease component if certain criteria are met. Lessors that make these elections are required to provide additional disclosures. The FASB provided an additional (and optional) transition method that allows entities to initially apply the guidance at the adoption date (January 1, 2019) and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The Company applied both these practical expedients upon adoption. The practical expedient allowed the Company to not separate expenses reimbursed by customers from the associated rental revenue if certain criteria were met. The Company assessed these criteria and concluded that the timing and pattern of transfer for rental revenue and the associated rental expense recoveries are the same and, as the leases qualify as operating leases, the Company accounted for and presented rents and expense recoveries as a single component under rental revenues in the consolidated statement of operations for 2019. As a result of the adoption of this practical expedient, the Company also presented $113.9 million and $113.3 million of rents and $33.4 million and $31.2 million of expense recoveries as single components in the consolidated statement of operations for 2018 and 2017, respectively, to conform to the new 2019 presentation.

~~Recently-Issued Accounting Pronouncements~~

In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance which enhances the methodology of measuring expected credit losses to include the use of forward-looking information to better calculate credit loss estimates. The guidance will apply to most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments, including accounts receivable, ~~straight-line rent receivables,~~ loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, net investments in leases, and off-balance-sheet credit exposures. The guidance will require that the Company estimate the lifetime expected credit loss with respect to these receivables and record allowances that, when deducted from the balance of the receivables, represent the net amounts expected to be collected. The Company will also be required to disclose information about how it developed the allowances, including changes in the factors that influenced the Company’s estimate of expected credit losses and the reasons for those changes. In November 2018, the FASB issued guidance to clarify that operating lease receivables, including straight-line rent receivables recorded by lessors are explicitly excluded from the scope of the June 2016 guidance. The guidance ~~would be~~was effective ~~for interim~~January 1, 2020, and ~~annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the guidance, but does~~it did not ~~believe it will~~ have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~December 31, 2019~~

Note 3. Real Estate

~~Real estate activity~~Investment in unconsolidated joint venture

On May 5, 2021, the Company formed a joint venture with Goldman Sachs Urban Investment Group and Asland Capital Partners (the “Joint Venture”) for ~~2019~~the construction of an approximately 258,000 square foot six-story commercial building in Washington, D.C. consisting of approximately 240,000 square feet of office space which is 100% leased to the Washington, D.C., Department of General Services (“DGS”) for its headquarters and ~~2018 is composed~~approximately 18,000 square feet of street-level retail. The term of the ~~following:~~lease with DGS is for 20 years and 10 months, to commence upon substantial completion and delivery to the DGS. The Company sold approximately $8.0 million of development costs to the Joint Venture as part of its formation on May 5, 2021.

Years ended December 31,

2019

2018

Cost

Balance, beginning of year

$
1,508,682,000

$
1,534,599,000

Properties transferred to held for sale

(36,265,000
)

(61,505,000
)
Property acquisitions

9,333,000

6,481,000

Asset write-offs

(3,633,000
)

—

Improvements and betterments

37,089,000

29,107,000

Balance, end of the year

$
1,515,206,000

$
1,508,682,000

Accumulated depreciation

Balance, beginning of the year

$
361,969,000

$
341,943,000

Properties transferred held for sale

(10,143,000
)

(14,886,000
)
Asset write-offs

(3,107,000
)

—

Depreciation expense

41,142,000

34,912,000

Balance, end of the year

$
389,861,000

$
361,969,000

Net book value

$
1,125,345,000

$
1,146,713,000

~~At December 31, 2019, Franklin Village Plaza~~On August 5, 2022, the Joint Venture was ~~pledged as collateral for a mortgage loan payable. See Note 8 - “Mortgage Loans Payable and Credit Facilities”.~~sold in connection with the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale. The Company contributed approximately $4.8 million of capital to the Joint Venture through its tenure.

~~2019~~2022 Acquisition

On June ~~19, 2019,~~28, 2022, the Company acquired the 40% minority ownership percentage in the Crossroads II joint venture for $1.0 million. The Company's ownership interest in Crossroads II was included in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale that occurred on July 7, 2022.

2021 Acquisition

On October 14, 2021, the Company purchased ~~Girard Plaza, a shopping center adjacent to its South Philadelphia property,~~the 60% minority ownership in the Patuxent Crossing joint venture, located in ~~Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.~~California, Maryland. The purchase price for the ~~property~~minority ownership was ~~$8.5 million, which has been allocated to real estate assets and liabilities.~~$0.3 million.

~~2018 Land Parcel Acquisition~~

~~2018 Shopping Center Acquisition~~

On August 21, 2018, the Company entered into a deed of lease for Senator Square, a shopping center located in Washington, D.C. The deed of lease conveys fee title in the buildings to the Company and contains future options to acquire fee title in the land at its then fair-value. The purchase price has been allocated to real estate assets and liabilities. This lease was originally presented in the Company’s financial statements as two separate components as follows: (1) a $5.7 million capital lease obligation for the fee interest in the buildings, and (2) an operating lease for the land. The capital lease obligation was computed through the date of the Company’s first purchase option, as discussed below, and reflects an interest rate of 5.3%. Effective January 1, 2019, based upon the adoption of the new lease accounting standard, the component of the lease that was originally recorded as a capital lease obligation is now classified as a finance lease obligation, and is being presented as such for all years presented.

The lease initially requires monthly payments of $75,000 through maturity in August 2117 unless the Company exercises one of its options to acquire the land. The first such option will be available between the 25th and 33rd anniversaries of the lease, depending on certain property benchmarks, with additional purchase options every 10 years thereafter during the lease term. The lease also

5549

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2019~~2022

Dispositions

~~provides for 1.5% annual increases which begin on approximately~~Excluding the 8th anniversary of the lease, depending on the aforementioned property benchmarks. In addition, at the time the Company’s first purchase option becomes available, the lease payments will be adjusted to the greater of then fair-value or the current payment amount. The lease payments are subject to similar adjustments at the 25thGrocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale, during 2022, 2021 and ~~50th anniversaries of such first purchase option.~~

The Company has also issued a $3.5 million interest only mortgage note receivable to the lessor of Senator Square, which bears interest at 4.5% per annum. The maturity date of this mortgage note can range from 26.5 years to 34.5 years from the date of issuance, based on the aforementioned property benchmarks.

~~Dispositions~~

~~During 2019, 2018 and 2017,~~2020, the Company sold the properties listed below:

Date

Sales

Gain on

Property

Location

Sold

Price

Sale

2019

Maxatawny Marketplace

Maxatawny, PA

2/15/2019

$
10,330,000

$
101,000

Fort Washington Center

Fort Washington, PA

6/26/2019

9,048,000

2,841,000

$
19,378,000

$
2,942,000

2018

Mechanicsburg Center

Mechanicsburg, PA

8/28/2018

$
16,100,000

$
4,864,000

West Bridgewater Plaza

West Bridgewater, MA

9/28/2018

3,500,000

-

$
19,600,000

$
4,864,000

2017

Outparcel Building adjacent to Camp Hill

Camp Hill, PA

2/1/2017

$
10,650,000

$
7,099,000

Fredericksburg Way

Fredericksburg, VA

12/29/2017

2,200,000

-

$
12,850,000

$
7,099,000


					Gain on Sale/
		Date	Sales		Reversal of
Property	Location	Sold	Price		Impairment
2022
Riverview Plaza	Philadelphia, PA	5/16/2022	$	34,000,000	$	(361,000	)

2021
Kempsville Crossing (land parcel)	Virginia Beach, VA	2/24/2021	$	1,300,000	$	1,047,000
The Commons	Dubois, PA	5/5/2021		9,761,000		1,849,000
Camp Hill Shopping Center	Camp Hill, PA	6/21/2021		89,662,500		48,857,000
			$	100,723,500	$	51,753,000
2020
Metro Square	Owings Mills, MD	7/9/2020	$	4,288,000	$	-
Oakland Mills outparcel building	Columbia, MD	9/17/2020		1,050,000		643,000
Glen Allen Shopping Center	Glen Allen, VA	10/8/2020		8,540,000		1,780,000
Pine Grove Plaza outparcel building	Brown Mills, NJ	11/2/2020		1,100,000		565,000
Suffolk Plaza	Suffolk, VA	12/10/2020		6,950,000		1,408,000
			$	21,928,000	$	4,396,000

Impairments of $9.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 also include those related to the Company's investment in the unconsolidated joint venture and the note receivable associated with Senator Square. These impairments are included in operating loss in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

Impairments of $58.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 relate to the Company's dual-track strategic alternatives process required upon classification as held for sale. These impairments are included in operating loss in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

The Company recorded impairment charges of ~~$9.4~~$7.2 million relating to ~~West Bridgewater Plaza~~Metro Square during ~~2018, and $9.5 million relating to Fredericksburg Way during 2017,~~2020, which are included in continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Real Estate Held for Sale

As of December 31, ~~2019, Carll’s Corner, located in Bridgeton, New Jersey, Suffolk Plaza, located in Suffolk, Virginia, and The Commons, located in Dubois, Pennsylvania, have been~~2022, there were no properties classified as “real estate held for sale” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. ~~The~~As of December 31, 2021, Carll’s Corner, located in Bridgeton, New Jersey, and Riverview Plaza, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, along with the properties that were part of the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and the East River Park and Senator Square redevelopment asset sales, were classified as “real estate held for sale” on the accompanying consolidated balance.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, real estate held for sale consists of the following:


	December 31,
	2022		2021
Real estate held for sale	$	—	$	736,230,000
Receivables		—		8,453,000
Other assets and deferred charges, net		—		12,354,000
Total real estate held for sale	$	—	$	757,037,000

During 2021, the Company recorded ana (1) reversal of impairment ~~charge~~charges of ~~$8.9~~$1.8 million for The Commons, located in ~~connection with~~Dubois, Pennsylvania, and (2) recorded, as part of the dual-track strategic alternatives process, impairment charges of $9.3 million. In addition, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.4 million for The Commons in ~~2019~~2020. These impairment charges were included in continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2022

Discontinued Operations

On July 7, 2022, the Company and ~~$11.3~~certain of its subsidiaries completed the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and the East River Park and Senator Square redevelopment asset sales for total gross proceeds of approximately $879 million, including the assumed debt. The assets sold in ~~connection with Carll’s Corner during 2018.~~these transactions are:


Property Name	Location	Property Name	Location
Academy Plaza	Philadelphia, PA	New London Mall	New London, CT
Bethel Shopping Center	Bethel, CT	Newport Plaza	Newport, PA
Carmans Plaza	Massapequa, NY	Northside Commons	Campbelltown, PA
Christina Crossing	Wilmington, DE	Norwood Shopping Center	Norwood, MA
Colonial Commons	Harrisburg, PA	Oak Ridge Shopping Center	Suffolk, VA
Crossroads II	Bartonsville, PA	Oakland Mills	Columbia, MD
East River Park	Washington, DC	Palmyra Shopping Center	Palmyra, PA
Elmhurst Square	Portsmouth, VA	Quartermaster Plaza	Philadelphia, PA
Fishtown Crossing	Philadelphia, PA	Senator Square	Washington, DC
Franklin Village Plaza	Franklin, MA	Shoppes at Arts District	Hyattsville, MD
General Booth Plaza	Virginia Beach, VA	Swede Square	E. Norriton Township, PA
Girard Plaza	Philadelphia, PA	The Point	Harrisburg, PA
Groton Shopping Center	Groton, CT	The Shops as Bloomfield Station	Bloomfield, NJ
Halifax Plaza	Halifax, PA	The Shops at Suffolk Downs	Revere, MA
Jordan Lane	Wethersfield, PA	Trexlertown Plaza	Trexlertown, PA
Kempsville Crossing	Virginia Beach, VA	Valley Plaza	Hagerstown, MD
Lawndale Plaza	Philadelphia, PA	Yorktowne Plaza	Cockeysville, MD
Meadows Marketplace	Hummelstown, PA

The Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale represents a strategic shift and has a material effect on the Company’s operations and financial results, and, therefore, the Company determined that it is deemed a discontinued operation. Accordingly, the portfolio of 33 grocery-anchored shopping centers have been classified as held for sale and the results of their operations have been classified as discontinued operations retrospectively for all periods presented herein.

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2022

The following is a summary of income (loss) from discontinued operations:


	Years ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020
REVENUES
Rental revenues	$	45,073,000		$	87,839,000		$	88,763,000
Other		184,000			524,000			885,000
Total revenues		45,257,000			88,363,000			89,648,000
EXPENSES
Operating, maintenance and management		10,818,000			19,518,000			21,311,000
Real estate and other property-related taxes		6,749,000			13,040,000			12,727,000
General and administrative		151,000			222,000			174,000
Depreciation and amortization		9,726,000			27,313,000			31,943,000
Total expenses		27,444,000			60,093,000			66,155,000


OPERATING INCOME		17,813,000			28,270,000			23,493,000

NON-OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest expense, net		(3,511,000	)		(4,735,000	)		(2,134,000	)
Total non-operating income and expenses		(3,511,000	)		(4,735,000	)		(2,134,000	)

INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		14,302,000			23,535,000			21,359,000

Impairment (charges) reversal		(16,629,000	)		(33,913,000	)		643,000
Gain on sales		125,500,000			1,047,000			—

TOTAL INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS	$	123,173,000		$	(9,331,000	)	$	22,002,000

Net cash provided by operations from discontinued operations was $25.9 million, $48.3 million and $39.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from discontinued operations was $651.5 million, $(21.2) million and $(23.4) million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Note 4. Fair Value Measurements

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, rents and other receivables, certain other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and variable-rate debt approximate their fair value due to their terms and/or short-term nature. The fair value of the Company’s investments and liabilities related to ~~share-based~~deferred compensation were determined to be Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy, and were based on independent values provided by financial institutions.

The fair value of the Company’s fixed rate mortgage loan was estimated using available market information and discounted cash flow analyses based on borrowing rates the Company believes it could obtain with similar terms and maturities. As of December 31, ~~2019 and~~2022, the Company's fixed rate mortgage loan payable was paid off. As of December 31, ~~2018,~~2021, the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate mortgage loan payable, which was determined to be Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy, was ~~$47.0~~$159.0 million and ~~$44.4 million, respectively;~~ the carrying value of such loan, was ~~$46.4 million and $47.3 million, respectively.~~$156.8 million. As of December 31, ~~2019~~2022, the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate secured term loans, which were determined to be Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy, was $131.8 million and the carrying value of such loans, was $131.5 million. As of December 31, ~~2018, respectively,~~2021, the aggregate fair values of the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans approximated the carrying values. In addition, the fair values of the Company’s mortgage note receivable and finance lease obligation, which were determined to be Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy, approximated their carrying values as of December 31, ~~2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.~~

5652

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2019~~2022

2021. The ~~valuation~~Company did not have the unsecured revolving credit facility, mortgage note receivable and finance lease obligation as of December 31, 2022.

The interest rate swaps were terminated as part of the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale. The valuations of the liabilities for the Company’s interest rate swaps, which are measured on a recurring basis, were determined to be Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy, and were based on independent values provided by financial institutions. Such valuations were determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analyses, on the expected cash flows of each derivative. The analyses reflect the contractual terms of the swaps, including the period to maturity, and user-observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves (“significant other observable inputs”). The fair value calculation also includes an amount for risk of non-performance using “significant unobservable inputs” such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default. The Company has concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2019,~~2021, the fair value associated with the “significant unobservable inputs” relating to the Company’s risk of non-performance was insignificant to the overall fair value of the interest rate swap agreements and, as a result, that the relevant inputs for purposes of calculating the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements, in their entirety, were based upon “significant other observable inputs”.

Nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the consolidated financial statements consist of real estate held for sale, which, if applicable, are measured on a nonrecurring basis, and have been determined to be (1) Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy, where applicable, based on the respective contracts of sale, adjusted for closing costs and expenses, or (2) Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy, where applicable, based on estimated sales prices, adjusted for closing costs and expenses, determined by discounted cash flow analyses, income capitalization analyses or a sales comparison approach if no contracts had been concluded. The discounted cash flow and income capitalization analyses include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specific holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums. These cash flows were composed of unobservable inputs which included forecasted rental revenues and expenses based upon existing in-place leases, market conditions and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these analyses were based upon observable rates that the Company believed to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties. The sales comparison approach is utilized for certain land values and includes comparable sales that were completed in the selected market areas. The comparable sales utilized in these analyses were based upon observable per acre rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties.

~~Valuations were prepared using internally-developed valuation models. These valuations are reviewed and approved, during each reporting period, by~~As a ~~diverse group~~result of ~~management, as deemed necessary, including personnel from~~ the ~~acquisition, accounting, finance, operations, development and leasing departments, and the valuations are updated as appropriate. In addition,~~Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale, the Company ~~may engage third-party valuation experts to assist with the preparation~~has no interest rate swap and deferred compensation assets or liabilities as of ~~certain of its valuations.~~

December 31, 2022. The following ~~tables show~~table shows the hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, ~~2019~~2021:


	December 31, 2021
Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Investments related to deferred compensation liabilities (a)	$	955,000	$	—	$	—	$	955,000
Deferred compensation liabilities (b)	$	982,000	$	—	$	—	$	982,000
Interest rate swaps liability (b)	$	—	$	8,232,000	$	—	$	8,232,000

(a)

Included in other assets and ~~December 31, 2018, respectively:~~

deferred charges, net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

December 31, 2019

Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Investments related to deferred

compensation liabilities (a)

$
823,000

$
—

$
—

$
823,000

Deferred compensation liabilities (b)

$
824,000

$
—

$
—

$
824,000

Interest rate swaps asset (a)

$
—

$
136,000

$
—

$
136,000

Interest rate swaps liability (b)

$
—

$
7,180,000

$
—

$
7,180,000

December 31, 2018

Description

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Investments related to deferred

compensation liabilities (a)

$
616,000

$
—

$
—

$
616,000

Deferred compensation liabilities (b)

$
610,000

$
—

$
—

$
610,000

Interest rate swaps asset (a)

$
—

$
8,871,000

$
—

$
8,871,000

Interest rate swaps liability (b)

$
—

$
1,576,000

$
—

$
1,576,000

(a) Included in other assets and deferred charges, net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(b) Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(b)

Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.~~

~~Notes~~In connection with the dual-track strategic alternatives process, it was determined that certain of the Company’s operating properties would be sold significantly prior to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~December 31, 2019~~

the end of their previously estimated hold periods. As of December 31, ~~2019,~~2021, the Company tested the recoverability of real estate held for use and, as a result of the carrying amount of the assets not being deemed recoverable and exceeding their fair value as measured on an asset by asset basis, recorded $58.5 million in impairment charges. These charges are included in impairment charges in the consolidated statement of operations. Such assets have an aggregate fair value of $84.8 million as of December 31, 2021. The fair value of the assets was determined to be Level 2.

As of December 31, 2021, real estate held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet consisted of ~~(1) one~~thirty seven retail ~~property,~~properties, totaling ~~$1.9~~$757.0 million, which ~~was~~were determined to be Level ~~3 asset~~2 assets under the hierarchy, ~~and was measured at~~for which the carrying values were below their fair ~~value less cost to sell on a non-recurring basis using~~values. During 2021, the Company recorded an ~~income capitalization approach, consisting~~impairment of ~~a capitalization rate of 8.5%, (2) one retail property, totaling $6.0~~$43.3 million, which ~~was determined~~is included in impairment charges in the consolidated statement of operations.

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to be Level 3 asset under the hierarchy, and was measured at fair value less cost to sell on a non-recurring basis using a discounted cash flow approach, consisting of a capitalization rate of 11.5% and a discount rate of 8.0%, and (3) the carrying value of a property which is below its fair value.Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2022

Note 5. Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents in excess of insured amounts and tenant receivables. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions. Management performs ongoing credit evaluations of its tenants and requires certain tenants to provide security deposits and/or suitable guarantees.

Excluding properties held for sale and ~~sold, Giant Food Stores, LLC, Stop & Shop, Inc. and Food Lion, LLC, each of which is owned by Ahold N.V., a Netherlands corporation,~~properties included in discontinued operations, there were no tenants that accounted for an aggregate of ~~approximately 12%, 11% and 12%~~more than 10% of the Company’s total revenues during ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017, respectively.~~2020.

~~The~~Excluding properties held for sale, the Company’s properties are located largely in the ~~region straddling the Washington, D.C. to Boston corridor,~~Northeast, which exposes it to greater economic risks than if the properties it owned were located in a greater number of geographic regions (in particular, 237 of the Company’s properties are located in Pennsylvania).

Note 6. Receivables

Receivables at December 31, ~~2019~~2022 and ~~2018~~2021 are composed of the following:


	December 31,
	2022		2021
Rents and other receivables, net	$	2,904,000	$	7,242,000
Mortgage note receivable		—		3,500,000
Straight-line rents, net		3,231,000		2,838,000
	$	6,135,000	$	13,580,000

December 31,

2019

2018

Rents and other receivables, net

$
5,061,000

$
4,443,000

Mortgage note receivable (a)

3,500,000

3,500,000

Straight-line rents, net

13,603,000

14,034,000

$
22,164,000

$
21,977,000

~~(a)~~

~~See “Note 3 – Real Estate - 2018 Shopping Center Acquisition~~” ~~for further disclosure.~~

5854

Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2019~~2022

Note 7. Other Assets and Deferred Charges, Net

Other assets and deferred charges, net, at December 31, ~~2019~~2022 and ~~2018~~2021 are composed of the following:


	December 31,
	2022		2021
Lease origination costs (a)	$	4,747,000	$	4,710,000
Right-of-use assets		2,062,000		9,861,000
Prepaid expenses		1,029,000		7,255,000
Investments related to share-based compensation		—		955,000
Unsecured revolving credit facility financing costs		—		1,134,000
Leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures		—		50,000
Other		86,000		(188,000	)
Total other assets and deferred charges, net	$	7,924,000	$	23,777,000

December 31,

2019

2018

Lease origination costs (a)

$
19,947,000

$
21,623,000

Right-of-use assets (b)

13,638,000

—

Interest rate swaps

136,000

8,871,000

Prepaid expenses

6,048,000

5,790,000

Unsecured revolving credit facility financing costs

1,021,000

1,627,000

Leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures

200,000

359,000

Investments related to share-based compensation

823,000

616,000

Other

326,000

1,756,000

Total other assets and deferred charges, net

$
42,139,000

$
40,642,000

(a)

Lease origination costs include the unamortized balance of intangible lease assets resulting from purchase accounting allocations of $0.1 million (cost of $1.8 million and accumulated amortization of $1.7 million) and $0.1 million (cost of $3.1 million and accumulated amortization of $3.0 million) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

~~(a)~~

Lease origination costs include the unamortized balance of intangible lease assets resulting from purchase accounting allocations of $6.6 million (cost of $19.9 million and accumulated amortization of $13.3 million) and $7.5 million (cost of $19.9 million and accumulated amortization of $12.4 million) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

~~(b)~~

In connection with of the new lease accounting standard (see Note 2 – “Recently-Adopted Accounting Pronouncements”), the Company recorded right-of-use assets and liabilities based on its future obligation under its ground lease and executive office lease agreements for which the Company is the lessee.

Deferred charges are amortized over the terms of the related agreements. Amortization expense related to deferred charges (including amortization of deferred financing costs included in non-operating income and expense), net of discontinued operations, amounted to ~~$5.3~~$7.2 million, ~~$5.2~~$2.4 million and ~~$5.1~~$2.6 million for ~~2019, 2018,~~2022, 2021, and ~~2017,~~2020, respectively. The unamortized balances of deferred lease origination costs is net of accumulated amortization of ~~$32.8~~$10.6 million at December 31, ~~2019. In addition, deferred financing costs relating to the unsecured revolving credit facility is net of accumulated amortization of $1.4 million at December 31, 2019.~~2022. Deferred lease origination costs ~~and deferred financing costs relating to the unsecured revolving credit facility~~ will be charged to future operations as follows:

	Lease		Unsecured revolving
	origination		credit facility		Lease
	costs		financing costs		origination
2020	$	2,858,000	$	614,000
2021		2,280,000		407,000
2022		1,995,000		—
					costs
2023		1,700,000		—	$	759,000
2024		1,453,000		—		766,000
2025						666,000
2026						596,000
2027						545,000
Thereafter		9,661,000		—		1,415,000
	$	19,947,000	$	1,021,000	$	4,747,000

The Company is ~~a party to certain legal actions arising in~~ the ~~normal course~~lessee under several ground lease agreements and its executive office lease agreement. The executive office lease agreement was terminated during the third quarter of ~~business. Management does not expect there to be adverse consequences from these actions that would be material to~~2022. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s ~~consolidated financial statements.~~weighted average remaining lease term is approximately 49.0 years and the weighted average discount rate used to calculate the Company’s lease liability is approximately 8.6%. Rent expense under the Company’s ground lease and executive office lease agreements was approximately $0.3 million, $0.5 million and $0.8 million for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The Company carries comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, business interruption and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in its portfolio under an insurance policy, in addition to other coverages, such as trademark and pollution coverage that may be appropriate for certain of its properties. Additionally, the Company carries a directors’, officers’, entity and employment practices liability insurance policy that covers such claims made against the Company and its directors and officers. The Company believes the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate for its properties given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice; however, its insurance coverage may not be sufficient to fully cover its losses.

Under various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances, or petroleum product releases, at its properties. The owner may be liable to governmental entities or to third parties for property damage, and for investigation and cleanup costs incurred by such parties in connection with any contamination. Generally, the Company’s tenants must comply with environmental laws and meet any remediation requirements. In addition, leases typically impose obligations on tenants to indemnify the Company from any compliance costs the Company may incur as a result of environmental conditions on the property caused by the tenant. However, if a lease does not require compliance, or if a tenant fails to or cannot comply, the Company could be forced to pay these costs. Management is unaware of any environmental matters that would have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s executive offices are located at 44 South Bayles Avenue, Port Washington, New York. The terms of the lease, which will expire in February 2021 subject to a one year extension option, provide for future minimum rents as follows: 2020 - $530,000 and 2021 - $89,000.Litigation

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ~~lessee under several ground lease~~ordinary course of its business, including, but not limited to commercial disputes. The Company believes that such litigation, claims and administrative proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on its financial position or its results of operations. The Company records a liability when it considers the loss probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. In addition, the below legal proceedings are in process:

As described in Note 1, on March 2, 2022, the Company entered into definitive agreements for the Transactions, which provided for the sale of the Company and its ~~executive office lease agreements. In accordance with the adoption~~assets in a series of related all-cash transactions. On April 5, 2022, a purported stockholder of the ~~new lease accounting standard (see Note 2 – “Recently-Adopted Accounting Pronouncements”),~~Company filed a complaint against the Company recorded right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities for these leases as of January 1, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s weighted average remaining lease term is approximately 32.4 years and the ~~weighted average discount rate used~~Board of Directors prior to ~~calculate~~ the ~~Company’s lease liability is approximately 5.7%. Rent expense under~~Merger in the ~~Company’s ground lease and executive office lease agreements was approximately $1.7 million, $1.1 million and $1.1 million~~United States District Court for ~~2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.~~

~~The following table represents a reconciliation~~the Eastern District of ~~the Company’s undiscounted future minimum lease payments for its ground lease and executive office lease agreements applicable to right-of-use liabilities as of December 31, 2019:~~

New York, entitled Stein v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et. al., Civil Action No. 22-cv-1944. On April 6, 2022, another purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint against the Company and the former Board of Directors in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entitled Wang v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et. al., Civil Action No. 22-cv-1975. On April 18, 2022, another purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint against the Company and the former Board of Directors in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entitled Whitfield v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et. al., Civil Action No. 22-cv-02204. Also on April 18, 2022, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint against the Company and the former Board of Directors in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, entitled Waterman v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et. al., Civil Action No. 22-cv-01489. On April 22, 2022, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint against the Company and the former Board of Directors in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entitled Thornburgh v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et. al., Civil Action No. 22-cv-02304. In each action, the complaint alleged violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) in connection with the proposed Transactions. The complaints generally allege that the preliminary proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed by the Company

with the SEC on April 5, 2022 omitted material information regarding financial projections, the financial analysis conducted by JLL Securities in connection with its fairness opinion, conflicts of interest on behalf of JLL Securities and BofA Securities, and the terms of BofA Securities’ engagement. The complaints sought, among other things, an injunction preventing the consummation of the Transactions, or, in the event the Transactions are consummated, damages resulting from Defendants’ alleged violations of the Exchange Act. The lawsuits were each voluntarily dismissed in July, August or September 2022.

On April 8, 2022, several purported holders of the Company’s outstanding preferred stock filed a putative class action complaint against the Company, the Board of Directors prior to the Merger, and WHLR in Montgomery County Circuit Court, Maryland entitled Sydney, et al. v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., et al., (Case No. C-15-CV-22-001527). The original complaint alleged on behalf of a putative class of holders of the Company’s preferred stock, among other things, against the Company and the former Board of Directors, claims for breach of contract with respect to the articles supplementary governing the terms of the Company’s preferred stock, breach of fiduciary duty, and tortious interference and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty against WHLR. The original complaint sought, among other things, a declaration that holders of the Company’s preferred stock are entitled to a liquidation preference as set forth in the articles supplementary governing the terms of the Company’s preferred stock, compensatory damages, and an injunction enjoining the merger with WHLR, and an injunction enjoining the distribution to the Company’s common shareholders of the proceeds of any of the Transactions pending a determination of the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims.

On May 6, 2022, Plaintiffs in the Sydney action filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint alleged on behalf of a putative class of holders of the Company’s preferred stock, among other things, against the Company and the former Board of Directors, claims for breach of contract with respect to the articles supplementary governing the terms of the Company’s preferred stock and breach of fiduciary duty, and, against WHLR, tortious interference and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. The Sydney amended complaint sought, among other things, (i) a declaration that holders of the Company’s preferred stock are entitled to exercise either their liquidation rights or conversion rights as set forth in the articles supplementary, (ii) compensatory damages, (iii) an injunction enjoining the distribution to the Company’s common shareholders of the proceeds of the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale, and (iv) an injunction enjoining the merger with WHLR. On May 6, 2022, the Plaintiffs in Sydney filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to temporarily enjoin, until the final resolution of the litigation (i) the distribution of the gross proceeds from the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale to the common stockholders, (ii) the closing of the merger with WHLR, and (iii) the imposition of a constructive trust over the gross proceeds from both the Grocery Anchored Portfolio Sale and the merger with WHLR. Also on May, 6, 2022, a purported holder of the Company’s outstanding preferred stock filed a putative class action complaint against the Company and the Board of Directors prior to the Merger in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, entitled Kim v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 22-cv-01103. The original complaint alleged on behalf of a putative class of holders of the Company’s preferred stock, among other things, claims for declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to the articles supplementary governing the terms of the Company’s preferred stock and breach of fiduciary duty. On May 11, 2022, the Company, the former Board of Directors of the Company and WHLR removed the Sydney action to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Case No. 8:22-cv-01142-GLR. On May 16, 2022, the court ordered that a hearing on the Sydney Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction will be held on June 22, 2022. On June 2, 2022, the Plaintiffs in Kim filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (i) to require that the Company provide preferred shareholders with a vote to approve the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and the Merger, and (ii) requiring Cedar disclose to preferred shareholders that the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and Merger entitled the preferred stockholders to exercise their change of control conversion right. The court agreed to consolidate the Kim Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction with the Sydney Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, and to hear arguments on both motions at the hearing on June 22, 2022.

On June 23, 2022, following a hearing on both the Sydney and Kim motions for preliminary injunction, the court issued an order denying both motions for preliminary injunction, holding that the Plaintiffs in both cases were unlikely to succeed on the merits of any of their contractual or fiduciary duty claims, and that Plaintiffs had not established that they would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction was denied. By order dated July 11, 2022, the Court consolidated the Sydney and Kim cases and set an August 24, 2022 deadline for the Plaintiffs in both cases to file a consolidated amended complaint. Plaintiffs filed their amended complaint on August 24, 2022, and, on October 7, 2022, Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the motion to dismiss on November 21, 2022 and Defendants filed a reply brief in support of their motions to dismiss on December 21, 2022. On February 2, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a motion to certify a question of law to the Maryland Supreme Court, and Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff's motion was filed on February 24, 2023. At this juncture, the outcome of the litigation is uncertain.

On July 11, 2022, a purported holder of the Company's outstanding preferred stock filed a complaint against the Company and the Board of Directors prior to the Merger in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entitled High Income Securities Fund v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., et al., No. 2:22-cv-4031. The complaint alleged that the Defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by making false and misleading statements and omissions, and that

the former Board of Directors are control persons under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. On August 12, 2022, Defendants requested permission to file a motion to dismiss, and Plaintiff responded to Defendants’ request on September 7, 2022. The court granted Defendants’ request to file a motion to dismiss on October 25, 2022. Defendants served their motion to dismiss on December 23, 2022, which Plaintiff opposed on January 27, 2023. Defendants filed a reply brief on the motion to dismiss on February 17, 2023. At this juncture, the outcome of the litigation is uncertain.

On October 14, 2022, a purported holder of the Company's outstanding preferred stock filed a putative class action against the Company, the Board of Directors prior to the Merger, and WHLR in Nassau County Supreme Court entitled Krasner v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., et al., (Case No. 613985/2022). The complaint alleges on behalf of a putative class of holders of the Company's preferred stock, among other things, against the Company and the former Board of Directors, claims for breach of contract with respect to the articles supplementary governing the terms of the Company's preferred stock, breach of fiduciary duty, and tortious interference and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty against WHLR. The complaint seeks, among other things, an award of monetary damages, attorneys' fees, and expert fees. Defendants removed the case to a federal court on November 14, 2022. On December 14, 2022, Plaintiff moved to remand the case, Defendants opposed Plaintiff's remand motion on December 28, 2022, and Plaintiff filed a reply brief in support of his remand motion on January 4, 2023. Defendants' deadline to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the complaint is 30 days after a ruling on Plaintiff's remand motion. At this juncture, the outcome of the litigation is uncertain.

~~In determining subsequent events, management reviewed all activity from January 1, 2020 through the date of filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K.~~

The changes in real estate and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, ~~2019, 2018~~2022, 2021 and ~~2017,~~2020, respectively, are as follows:

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure: None

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its filings under the Exchange Act is reported within the time periods specified in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In this regard, the Company has formed a Disclosure Committee currently ~~comprised of~~comprising several of the Company’s executive officers as well as certain other employees with knowledge of information that may be considered in the SEC reporting process. The Disclosure Committee has responsibility for the development and assessment of the financial and non-financial information to be included in the reports filed with the SEC, and assists the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in connection with their certifications contained in the Company’s SEC filings. The Disclosure Committee meets regularly and reports to the Audit Committee on a quarterly or more frequent basis. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated its disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, and have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

~~During~~There has been no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended December 31, ~~2019, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors~~2022 that ~~have~~has materially affected, or ~~are~~is reasonably likely to materially affect, ~~these~~the Company's internal ~~controls~~control over financial reporting. Effective August 22, 2022, the Company completed the merger with WHLR, and, as a result, the Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of WHLR. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting continued to operate as designed to support the consolidation of the Company into WHLR. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how ~~well designed~~well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2019.~~2022. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in “Internal Control – 2013 Integrated Framework”. Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

~~Ernst & Young~~Cherry Bekaert LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which appears elsewhere in this report.

We have audited Cedar Realty Trust Inc.’s (the Company’s) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2019,~~2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ~~(2013 framework) (the COSO criteria)~~(“COSO”). In our opinion, ~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.~~the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2019,~~2022 based on ~~the COSO criteria.~~criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ~~(PCAOB)~~(“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance ~~sheets~~sheet of the Company as of December 31, ~~2019~~2022 and ~~2018,~~ the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for ~~each of~~ the ~~three years in the period~~year ended December 31, ~~2019, and the related notes and schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)~~2022, and our report dated ~~February 13, 2020~~March 2, 2023, expressed an unqualified ~~opinion thereon.~~opinion.

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying ~~Item 9A. Controls and Procedures – “Management~~“Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control ~~Over~~over Financial Reporting”. included in Item 9A- Controls and Procedures in the Company’s 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed ~~risk, and~~risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections: Not applicable

In accordance with the rules of the SEC, certain information required by Part III is omitted and is incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which we expect to file in March 2020 (and in any event not later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year), for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.

~~Item 10.~~

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The affairs of the Company are managed by the Board of Directors. Directors are elected annually by the Company's sole holder of its common stock, and serve until a successor has been elected or approved.

Code of Ethics and Governance Principles

The Company is operating under WHLR's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors, a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Employees, Officers, Agents and Representatives, and Corporate Governance Principles, which are available on our website, all under separate headings as allowed by the NYSE Governance Requirements. The Company will post any amendments to or waivers from its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (to the extent applicable to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) on its website.

The issuer is relying on the general exemption to the requirement to have an audit committee provided in Rule 10A-3. WHLR satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 with respect to its common stock listed on NASDAQ. The issuer is 100% beneficially owned by WHLR. The issuer has listed on the NYSE only non-convertible, non-participating preferred securities.

Members of the Board of Directors

As of December 31, 2022, the members of the Board of Directors are identified below:

Directors

Kerry G. Campbell

Paula J. Poskon

E.J. Borrack

M. Andrew Franklin

Crystal Plum

~~This item is incorporated by reference~~Kerry G. Campbell

Chairman of the Board of Directors; Independent Director

Age — 57

Director since 2022

Mr. Campbell was appointed to the ~~definitive proxy statement~~Board of Directors in August 2022. Mr. Campbell is the principal of a financial litigation and investment management consulting firm, Kerry Campbell LLC, where since February 2014, he has served as a financial expert witness for arbitrations and litigations and provided consulting services to financial institutions and investors. His firm has been retained by institutional investors, high net worth investors and large global diversified financial institution.

Mr. Campbell received an M.B.A in Finance from the University of Chicago Booth Graduate School of Business and a Bachelor of Science in Finance summa cum laude from Fordham University Gabelli School of Business. Mr. Campbell is an Approved FINRA Dispute Resolution Arbitrator, a Chartered Financial Analyst®, a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™, an Accredited Investment Fiduciary Analyst™ and a Securities Experts Roundtable Member.

Mr. Campbell has been chosen as a director based on his 30 plus years of extensive and diverse financial industry experience, together with his experience as a financial expert witness on behalf of defendants and plaintiffs in arbitrations and litigations.

E.J. Borrack

Independent Director

Age — 58

Director since 2022

E.J. Borrack was appointed to the Board of Directors in August 2022. Since 2013, she has been the General Counsel of The Stilwell Group, a group of private investment partnerships with a focus on activist investing in financially-related, small-cap companies. Previously, she was the Chief Compliance Officer of two SEC registered investment advisers. She was also the General Counsel of Wealthfront during that company’s start-up phase.

Ms. Borrack graduated from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and has a B.A. in English from the University of Pennsylvania.

Ms. Borrack has been chosen as a director based on her breadth of experience working on issues involving complex commercial litigation, regulatory compliance, securities regulation, and corporate governance.

Paula J. Poskon
Independent Director
Age — 57
Director since 2022

Ms. Poskon was appointed to the Board of Directors in August 2022. Ms. Poskon is the President of STOV Advisory Services LLC (“STOV”), which offers professional consulting and advisory services to company executives and institutional investors in the areas of real estate, capital markets, investor relations, and diversity and inclusion. She founded STOV in July 2016. For the past 15 years of her two decades of capital markets experience, Ms. Poskon specialized in real estate investment trusts.

Ms. Poskon graduated from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania with a Bachelor of Science in Economics with a concentration in Accounting and a Master of Business Administration in Finance with a concentration in Strategic Management and considerable coursework in real estate finance.

Ms. Poskon has been chosen as a director based on her more than 20 years of capital markets experience in equity research and investment banking, the majority of which was focused on public REITs.

M. Andrew Franklin and Crystal Plum

Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum are also officers of the Company, and their biographies are included below.

Executive Officers

M. Andrew Franklin

Director, Chief Executive Officer and President since August 2022

Age — 42

Andrew Franklin was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President and Director in August 2022, in connection with consummation of the Company's merger with WHLR. He was also appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President of WHLR in 2021 and previously served as their Interim Chief Executive Officer since July 2021, Chief Operating Officer since February 2018, and Senior Vice President of Operations since January 2017. Mr. Franklin has over 23 years of commercial real estate experience. Mr. Franklin is responsible for overseeing the property management, lease administration and leasing divisions of our growing portfolio of commercial assets. Prior to joining us, Mr. Franklin was a partner with Broad Reach Retail Partners where he ran the day-to-day operations of the company, managing the leasing team as well as overseeing the asset, property and construction management of the portfolio with assets totaling $50 million. Mr. Franklin is a graduate of the University of Maryland, with a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance.

Crystal Plum

Director and Chief Financial Officer since August 2022

Age — 41

Crystal Plum was appointed as Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary and Director in August 2022, in connection with consummation of the Company's merger with WHLR. She was also appointed as Chief Financial Officer of WHLR in February 2020 ~~Annual Meeting~~and previously served as their Vice President of ~~Shareholders,~~Financial Reporting and Corporate Accounting from March 2018 to February 2020 and as their Director of Financial Reporting from September 2016 to March 2018. Prior to that time, she served as Manager at Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP from September 2014 to August 2016 and as Supervisor at Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP from 2008 to September 2014. Ms. Plum has experience reviewing and performing audits, reviews, compilations and tax engagements for a diverse group of clients, as well as banking experience. Ms. Plum is a Certified Public Accountant and has a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration — Accounting and Finance from Old Dominion University.

Director Compensation

Directors who are employees or officers of our Company do not receive any compensation for their services. For fiscal year 2022 prior to August 22, 2022, non-employee directors were entitled to annual cash compensation in the amount of $28,000 for their services as directors, with an additional annual cash retainer of $60,000 for service as Chair. Additionally, non-employee directors were entitled to annual cash compensation in the amount of $3,000 for committee membership, with the committee chair entitled to $12,000. Each non-employee director, other than Mr. Campbell, Ms. Poskon and Ms. Borrack, also received a grant of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $55,000 paid quarterly that will vest in full on the third anniversary of each quarterly grant date.

For fiscal year 2022 subsequent to August 22, 2022, non-employee and non-officer directors were entitled to annual cash compensation in the amount of $50,000 for their services as directors, with an additional annual cash retainer of $40,000 for service as Chair, to be ~~filed~~paid quarterly.

We reimburse each of our directors for his or her expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board of Directors and committee meetings.

The following table summarizes our directors’ compensation for 2022:


	Fees Earned
	or Paid		Stock Awards (1) (2)		All Other
Name	in Cash ($)		($)		Compensation ($)			Total ($)
Kerry G. Campbell		32,000		—		—			32,000
Paula J. Poskon		18,000		—		—			18,000
E.J. Borrack		18,000		—		—			18,000
M. Andrew Franklin		—		—		—			—
Crystal Plum		—		—		—			—
Abraham Eisenstat		37,500		27,500		—			65,000
Gregg A. Gonsalves		70,400		27,500		100,000	(3)		197,900
Sabrina L. Kanner		37,500		27,500		—			65,000
Darcy D. Morris		29,800		27,500		—			57,300
Steven G. Rogers		37,500		27,500		—			65,000
Richard H. Ross		29,800		27,500		—			57,300
Bruce J. Schanzer		—		—		—			—
Sharon Stern		29,800		27,500		—			57,300

(1)

The amounts represent the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted to the directors in 2022, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, not including any estimates of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. See Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements in this 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding assumptions we made in determining the fair value of stock awards. Each director received a grant of restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $55,000 paid quarterly that will vest in full on the third anniversary of each quarterly grant date. The number of shares granted is calculated

based on the closing share price on the date of grant. For 2022, director share grants were made on January 3, 2022 and April 1, 2022, based on a closing share price of $25.11 and $27.64, respectively.

(2)

As of December 31, 2022, none of the directors held any restricted shares. All outstanding equity awards that were subject to time-based vesting, including all outstanding restricted stock awards held by our non-employee directors, fully accelerate and vest upon a “sale event” or a “change in control,” as applicable (as such terms are defined in the applicable equity plan and each of which included completion of the Merger) pursuant to ~~Regulation 14A.~~the terms of the applicable equity plan. In connection with the closing of the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger, each outstanding restricted stock award became fully vested and nonforfeitable and the holder thereof received the aggregate per share consideration for each share of the Company’s common stock underlying such award.

(3)

This amount represents a deal transaction bonus.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers, and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock to file reports with the SEC indicating their holdings of, and transactions in, the Company’s equity securities. Based solely on a review of copies of these reports, we believe that all of our executive officers, directors, and 10% owners timely complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements for fiscal 2022, except for one late Form 4 for each of Mr. Eisenstat, Mr. Gonsalves, Ms. Kanner, Mr. Morris, Mr. Rogers, Mr. Ross and Ms. Stern reporting one transaction related to grants of restricted stock under the Company’s incentive plan.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) discusses the principles underlying our executive compensation policies and decisions for our named executive officers. The discussion relates to the Company’s named executive officers (“NEOs”). The Company’s NEOs for 2022 were:

NEOs

M. Andrew Franklin, President and Chief Executive Officer

Bruce J. Schanzer, former President and Chief Executive Officer

Jennifer Bitterman, former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Crystal Plum, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

Robin M. Zeigler, former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

No other employees of the Company qualified as executive officers under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum were appointed to their roles on August 22, 2022, upon the completion of the Company’s acquisition by WHLR (the “Merger”). Mr. Schanzer and Ms. Bitterman served in their capacities noted above until the completion of the Merger. Ms. Zeigler resigned from her position on May 6, 2022. Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum are referred to as the “Current NEOs” and Mr. Schanzer, Ms. Bitterman and Ms. Zeigler are referred to as the “Prior NEOs” in this Item 11.

Introduction

The compensation of the Company’s Prior NEOs was determined by the Company’s compensation committee that existed prior to the Merger (the “Pre-Merger Compensation Committee”). Upon the completion of the Merger, because the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of WHLR and its only equity securities that are registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are shares of non-voting preferred stock, the Pre-Merger Compensation Committee was disbanded and its charter rescinded. Therefore, the discussion of the Company’s compensation practices and philosophy in place prior the Merger is based on information made available to the Company’s current Board of Directors and management.

Following the Merger, the only two officers of the Company, Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum, also serve as officers of WHLR. Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum are compensated by WHLR, and the Company is obligated to reimburse WHLR for certain costs pursuant to a Cost Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement, including compensation paid by WHLR to Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum for services provided to Cedar. However, in 2022, the Company did not reimburse WHLR for any of these costs because of certain limitations on the aggregate amount of payments that may be made from the Company to WHLR under the Cost Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement. In future years, it is expected that the Company will reimburse WHLR for the compensation paid by WHLR to Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum for services provided to Cedar by Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum.

The compensation paid by WHLR to Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum will be more fully described in WHLR’s proxy statement that will be filed in connection with its 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

Pre-Merger Compensation Philosophy

The pre-Merger executive compensation program was designed to attract and retain talented senior executives, ensure that their compensation remained competitive relative to the compensation paid to similarly-situated senior executives at comparable publicly-traded REITs, and reward them for superior performance. The program was further designed to reward both short- and long-term performance and to align the senior executives’ and former stockholders’ interests. To that end, the compensation packages provided to the Prior NEOs included both cash and share-based incentive compensation that rewarded performance as measured, in large part, against corporate and individual goals intended to enhance stockholder value over the long term.

The Pre-Merger Compensation Committee intended that the overall compensation of the pre-Merger senior executives should primarily reflect their accomplishments as a management team in achieving established key objectives, including the execution of the strategic plan and that the achievement of these key objectives would ultimately enhance stockholder value of the pre-Merger Company as reflected in an increased share price. The Pre-Merger Compensation Committee believed the compensation of the Company’s senior executives should not be based on short-term performance of the Company shares, whether favorable or unfavorable, but rather that the long-term price of the Company’s shares is a better reflection of the management of the Company by its senior executives. In this regard, the restricted stock historically granted to the Company’s senior executives had vesting periods ranging from three to seven years. The Company’s senior executives were aligned with the pre-Merger Company’s shareholders in that they were also subject to the downside risk of a decrease in the value of their compensation in the event the price of our shares declines.

Consistent with this philosophy, the executive pay program used a combination of base salary, annual cash incentive bonuses and long-term equity incentive awards, with a significant portion of compensation being at risk and dependent on the performance of the Company and the executive, to align executive interests with those of stockholders.

Pre-Merger Compensation Objectives

Prior to the Merger, the Pre-Merger Compensation Committee used three primary pay elements in its executive compensation program: base salary, annual cash incentive bonuses and long-term equity compensation.

Base salary was intended to attract and retain talented executives and to provide compensation that was commensurate with the executive’s scope of responsibility and effectiveness. Cash incentive bonuses were designed to align the executive’s compensation with our short-term business goals and individual performance goals. Long-term equity compensation focused on achieving the Company’s pre-Merger long-term TSR goals and executive retention. The pre-Merger Company used long-term equity to retain its executives by rewarding them with equity only if they remained with the Company for a substantial period of time and if the Company achieved specified average TSR goals over the preceding three-year period. The allocation between cash and non-cash compensation or short- and long-term compensation was reviewed periodically. A significant portion of compensation was at risk and variable depending on both short- and long-term financial performance, with the largest portion designed to incentivize executives to focus on long-term stockholder value creation.

Pre-Merger Base Salary

Base salaries for the Prior NEOs depended on the scope of their responsibilities and performance. Base salary was designed to compensate the executives fairly for services rendered during the year. The Pre-Merger Compensation Committee received from Mr. Schanzer his recommended salary level for each executive officer (other than Mr. Schanzer) for its review. For 2022, the base salaries of Mr. Schanzer and Ms. Zeigler remained unchanged from 2021. Ms. Bitterman's salary increased upon her promotion to Chief Financial Officer in late 2021.

The Pre-Merger Compensation Committee was required to review base salaries annually and could have increased, but not further decreased, the executive officers' salaries pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements. In making decisions regarding executive officers’ base salaries, the Pre-Merger Compensation Committee took into account relevant factors, including individual performance and market compensation data.

Pre-Merger Annual Cash Incentive Bonus

The Pre-Merger Compensation Committee sought to align the interests of the Prior NEOs with the strategic initiatives of the Company. The Company did not pay annual cash incentive bonuses other than those described below in the Summary Compensation Table.

Pre-Merger Long-Term Compensation

The Pre-Merger Compensation Committee believed that outstanding long-term performance was achieved when executives had an ownership position that encouraged them to focus on the Company’s long-term success. Long-term equity awards were made to eligible employees to align their long-term interests with those of stockholders, deliver market competitive pay, provide a strong retentive hook, and aid in recruitment. At the same time, by incentivizing our senior management as stakeholders in our performance, the Company benefited on an operational level from improved productivity and efficiency gains, and the associated value creation. The Pre-Merger Compensation Committee did not approve any equity awards in 2022, in light of the pending Transactions.

Treatment of Equity and Equity-Based Awards in Connection with the Merger

Our Prior NEOs’ restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards were treated in connection with the Merger as described below. All outstanding equity awards that were subject to time-based vesting, including all outstanding restricted stock awards held by our Prior NEOs, fully accelerated and vested upon a “sale event” or a “change in control,” as applicable (as such terms were defined in the applicable equity plan and each of which included completion of the Merger) pursuant to the terms of the applicable equity plan. In addition, our Prior NEOs were party to employment and other executive agreements with the Company that provided for certain acceleration of vesting of performance-based equity awards in the event of a change in control, which included completion of the Merger.

In connection with the closing of the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio Sale and immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger:

•

Restricted Stock Awards: Each outstanding restricted stock award became fully vested and nonforfeitable and the holder thereof received the aggregate per share consideration for each share of the Company’s common stock underlying such award.

•

Restricted Stock Units. Each outstanding restricted stock unit award that was subject to performance-based vesting fully vested in accordance with its terms and converted into the respective number of shares of Company common stock underlying such award and the holder thereof received the aggregate per share consideration with respect to each share of the Company’s common stock underlying such award as well as accrued dividend equivalent rights with respect to such restricted stock unit award.

The 2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested table below shows the number of shares underlying outstanding unvested restricted stock awards and unvested restricted stock unit awards held by our Prior NEOs that vested in connection with the Merger and the consideration, in cash, they received for these awards.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

We do not consider it appropriate for any of the Company’s officers, directors or employees to enter into speculative transactions in the Company’s securities that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in market value of the Company’s securities. As a result, the Company prohibits officers, directors or employees from purchasing puts, calls, options or other derivative securities based on the Company’s securities or its correlates. The policy also prohibits hedging or monetization transactions, such as forward sale contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds. Officers, directors and employees may also not purchase securities of the Company on margin, borrow against any account in which the Company’s securities are held or otherwise pledge any securities of the Company.

Compensation Committee Report

Pursuant to NYSE rules, because the Company meets the definition of a “controlled company” and lists only non-voting preferred stock, the Company is not required to and does not have a compensation committee. In the absence of a compensation committee, the Company’s Board of Directors and management reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by the Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. Based on such review and discussion, the

Board of Directors recommends that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Board of Directors:

Directors

Kerry G. Campbell

Paula J. Poskon

E.J. Borrack

M. Andrew Franklin

Crystal Plum

Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the total compensation for the fiscal years indicated paid or awarded to each of our named executive officers, calculated in accordance with SEC rules and regulations:


							Stock		All Other
	Fiscal		Salary (1)		Bonus (2)		Awards (3)		Compensation		Total
Name	Year		($)		($)		($)		($)		($)
M. Andrew Franklin (4)		2022		—		—		—		—		—
Chief Executive Officer
and President
Crystal Plum (4)		2022		—		—		—		—		—
Chief Financial
Officer
Bruce J. Schanzer (5)		2022		461,500		10,000,000		—		12,405,200		22,866,700
Former Chief Executive		2021		750,000		750,000		—		34,000		1,534,000
Officer		2020		750,000		403,800		—		33,800		1,187,600
Jennifer Bitterman (6)		2022		244,400		1,252,000		—		839,000		2,335,400
Former Chief Financial		2021		246,900		308,800		325,000		11,600		892,300
Officer		2020		220,400		37,100		—		9,900		267,400
Robin M. Zeigler (7)		2022		150,900		—		—		3,810,300		3,961,200
Former Chief Operating		2021		436,000		414,200		262,500		17,600		1,130,300
Officer		2020		436,000		223,900		—		17,400		677,300

(1)

Amounts shown include amounts deferred at the election of the named executive officers into the Company’s 401(k) plan, to the extent applicable.

(2)

For 2022, the amounts represent contractual bonuses in relation to the Transactions, as defined in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K.

(3)

This column represents the grant date fair value of stock awards granted under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plans. The number of shares granted is calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), not including any estimates of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K regarding assumptions we made in determining the fair value of stock awards. Ms. Zeigler's stock award was granted in 2021 and forfeited in 2022, due to employment cessation as discussed in (8) below.

(4)

Appointed in August 2022, upon the closing of the Merger. As discussed in the CD&A, Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum are compensated by WHLR and the Company did not reimburse WHLR for any related compensation costs in 2022.

(5)

Mr. Schanzer's employment ceased upon the closing of the Merger. The 2022 “all other compensation” amount for Mr. Schanzer includes tax gross up on deferred accounts ($8.08 million), severance payment in connection with his termination of employment following the Merger ($3.75 million), payment in respect of his DERs ($500,000), COBRA premiums payable

following his termination of employment ($50,000), automobile allowances ($13,800) and matching contributions made by the Company to his 401(k) plan ($12,200).

(6)

Ms. Bitterman was appointed Chief Financial Officer on September 9, 2021. Prior to her appointment, she served as the Senior Vice President of Corporate and Portfolio Management. Ms. Bitterman's employment ceased upon the closing of the Merger. The 2022 “all other compensation amount” for Ms. Bitterman includes severance in connection with her termination of employment following the Merger ($833,000) and matching contributions made by the Company to her 401(k) plan ($6,000).

(7)

Ms. Zeigler's employment ceased on May 6, 2022. Base salary for Ms. Zeigler in 2022 includes base salary through May 6, 2022. The 2022 “all other compensation amount” for Ms. Zeigler includes a consulting agreement payment ($3.75 million), COBRA premiums payable following her termination of employment ($50,000), matching contributions made by the Company to her 401(k) plan ($8,000, through May 6, 2022) and automobile allowances ($2,000, through May 6, 2022).

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Year Ended December 31, 2022

There were no grants of plan-based awards for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022

There were no outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2022.

2022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

No options were granted by the Company or exercised during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. None of the named executive officers have ever been granted stock options.


	Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (1)		Value Realized on Vesting ($) (1)
M. Andrew Franklin		—		—
Crystal Plum		—		—
Bruce J. Schanzer		265,150		2,513,622
Jennifer Bitterman		19,117		181,229
Robin M. Zeigler		—		—

(1)

In connection with the Merger, shares of common stock held by Mr. Schanzer and Ms. Bitterman were converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the per share merger consideration of $9.48. The number of shares shown for Mr. Schanzer include 151,514 common shares and 113,636 restricted shares. Ms. Zeigler's shares were forfeited upon her termination of employment on May 6, 2022.

2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation


	Executive ~~Compensation~~		Registrant		Aggregate				Aggregate
	Contributions		Contributions		Earnings		Aggregate		Balance
	in Last		in Last		in Last		Withdrawals/		at Last
	Fiscal Year		Fiscal Year		Fiscal Year		Distributions (1)		Fiscal Year-End
Name	($)		($)		($)		($)		($)
M. Andrew Franklin		—		—		—		—		—
Crystal Plum		—		—		—		—		—
Bruce J. Schanzer		—		—		—		8,787,800		—
Jennifer Bitterman		—		—		—		—		—
Robin M. Zeigler		—		—		—		141,800		—

(1)

The plan was terminated in connection with the Merger; accordingly, all participants received a full distribution of their accounts immediately following closing.

~~This item is incorporated~~Two of our Prior NEOs, Mr. Schanzer and Ms. Zeigler, participated in the 2005 Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, participants could defer a portion of their base salaries and cash bonuses on a pre-tax basis and receive a tax-deferred return on such amounts based on

the performance of specific investments selected by ~~reference~~the participants. Participants could also defer share awards made under the Company’s equity incentive plans, as well as related dividends. In connection with the Deferred Compensation Plan, the Company established a “rabbi trust” overseen by an independent trustee, wherein the trustee was directed to make investments of the deferred cash amounts, which tracked as closely as possible to those selected by each participant in order to generally match its liabilities to the ~~definitive proxy statement~~participants under the deferred compensation plan with equivalent assets and thereby limit market risk. Generally, cash deferrals were distributed in a lump sum on the earlier of the first day of the 61st month following the end of the calendar year to which such deferral relates, or as soon as practicable after the participant’s separation from service for any reason other than death or retirement (or six months thereafter, in the case of any participant who is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”)), unless the participant elects to receive the distribution in installments, or to otherwise further defer the distribution, as provided in the plan. Generally, share deferrals will be distributed in a lump sum on the later of (a) the first business day of the January next following the third anniversary date of the grant, or (b) the first business day of the January next following the date on which the share deferrals are scheduled to vest in their entirety based on the original vesting schedule, unless the participant elects to receive the distribution in installments, or to otherwise further defer the distribution, as provided in the plan. In the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the plan) that constitutes a change in control event under Section 409A of the Code, participants shall become 100% vested in their share deferral accounts, and the Board could terminate the plan and distribute all benefits under the plan to participants. In the event of a termination or constructive termination of the plan in connection with a change in control, such plan provides for an income tax gross up on plan benefits distributed to participants as well as a tax gross-up on any amounts under the plan that are subject to the 20% penalty tax under Section 409A of the Code.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum

As of December 31, 2022, Mr. Franklin's employment agreement with WHLR provides for benefits upon a change in control of WHLR, which is the parent of the Company. In the event that Mr. Franklin terminated his employment with Good Reason following a “Change in Control” (as defined in his employment agreement) or was terminated by WHLR without Cause and such termination occurred within six months of a Change in Control, Mr. Franklin would generally be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 2.99 times his annual base salary ($400,000), less mandatory deductions, payable within ninety calendar days of the termination (and, in the case of such a termination without Cause, a bonus amount based on any bonus determined by WHLR's Board of Directors and payable to other executives of WHLR during the twelve months after the Change in Control). In addition, Mr. Franklin would be entitled to health care coverage pursuant to COBRA at Mr. Franklin’s expense for up to eighteen months.

As of December 31, 2022, Ms. Plum was not party to any arrangements with the Company or WHLR that provide for benefits payable upon a termination of employment or change in control.

Separation Agreements with Mr. Schanzer and Ms. Bitterman

Each of Mr. Schanzer and Ms. Bitterman terminated employment immediately following the Merger. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Schanzer received a lump sum payment comprised of: (i) a $3.75 million severance payment; (ii) a $10.0 million change in control cash payment, and (iii) a $500,000 cash payment in respect in his DERs. Pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement, Ms. Bitterman received a $833,000 severance payment, payable in a lump sum, as well as the $1.252 million change in control bonus previously disclosed. WHLR and Mr. Schanzer entered into a Restrictive Covenant Agreement, pursuant to which Mr. Schanzer agreed to customary non-compete and non-solicitation covenants for a four-year period following closing of the Merger.

Separation Agreement with Ms. Zeigler

Ms. Zeigler resigned from her position with the Company effective as of May 6, 2022. Pursuant to the terms of her separation agreement with the Company, Ms. Zeigler retained any vested shares of restricted Company stock and any vested securities and cash held in the Deferred Compensation Plan, but was not otherwise entitled to any compensation, severance or bonus after the effective date of her resignation, except for premiums for health insurance under COBRA for up to 12 months following her resignation. Ms. Zeigler forfeited her unvested equity awards under the Company’s equity incentive plans, as well as the right to any tax gross-up or other tax-related payments from the Company applicable to her vested assets in the Deferred Compensation Plan.

Consulting Agreement with Ms. Zeigler

Concurrently with the execution of the separation agreement, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an entity controlled by Ms. Zeigler, pursuant to which Ms. Zeigler agreed to assist the Company with respect to certain matters relating to the Company’s existing joint venture for the ~~2020 Annual Meeting~~construction of ~~Shareholders,~~an approximately 258,000 square foot six-story commercial building in Washington, D.C and to ~~be filed pursuant~~advance the planned redevelopment of two existing shopping centers. Pursuant to ~~Regulation 14A.~~the consulting agreement, Ms. Zeigler received an up-front payment from the Company of $3.0 million, and is entitled to receive an additional payment of $750,000 upon the earlier of completion of the sale of the development to one or more third parties, or the second anniversary of the agreement.

CEO Pay Ratio

As of December 31, 2022, the Company did not have any employees. Accordingly, the CEO pay ratio disclosure is not applicable to the Company.

~~Item 12.~~

~~Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters~~

~~This item~~Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Based upon our records and the information reported in filings with the SEC, the following were beneficial owners of more than 5% of our shares of Common Stock as of December 31, 2022:


	Number of Shares		Percentage of Class
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Beneficially Owned		Beneficially Owned (1)
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.		13,718,169		100.0	%
2529 Virginia Beach Boulevard
Virginia Beach, VA 23452

(1)

Based upon 13,718,169 shares of Common Stock outstanding on December 31, 2022. All beneficial ownership identified on this table is ~~incorporated~~held by ~~reference to~~ the ~~definitive proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.~~beneficial owner with sole voting power and sole investment power.

Name of

Number of

Percentage of

Number of

Percentage of

NEO or

Series B Shares

Series C Shares

Director

Beneficially Owned

Kerry G. Campbell

—

Paula J. Poskon

—

E.J. Borrack

—

M. Andrew Franklin

2,890

1,900

Crystal Plum

—

Directors and Executive Officers as a Group

2,890

1,900

* Less than 1%

~~Item 13.~~

~~Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence~~

~~This item~~Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Related Party Policies and Related Party Transactions

WHLR's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires that our directors and officers deal with the Company on an arms-length basis in any related party transaction. All transactions between us and any of our directors, named executive officers or other vice presidents, or between us and any entity in which any of our directors, named executive officers or other vice presidents is ~~incorporated~~an officer or director or has an ownership interest, must be pre-approved by ~~reference to~~ the ~~definitive proxy statement~~Board of Directors.

With the completion of the Company's Merger with WHLR, the Company became a wholly-owned subsidiary of WHLR. WHLR performs property management and leasing services for the ~~2020 Annual Meeting~~Company. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company paid WHLR $1.0 million for these services. The related party amounts due to WHLR for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $7.3 million, which consists primarily of ~~Shareholders,~~financing costs, real estate taxes and costs paid on the Company's behalf at the closing of the KeyBank Credit Agreement. The Operating Partnership and WHLR’s operating partnership, Wheeler REIT, L.P., are party to ~~be filed~~a cost sharing and reimbursement agreement, pursuant to ~~Regulation 14A.~~which the parties agreed to share costs and expenses associated with certain employees, certain facilities and property, and certain arrangements with third parties

(the “Cost Sharing Agreement”). During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company did not make any payments to WHLR for these services due to certain limitations set forth in the Cost Sharing Agreement.

Determinations of Director Independence

The Board of Directors currently consists of five members. The Chair of the Board of Directors is Kerry G. Campbell. The Board of Directors reviews the independence of each director yearly. During this review, the Board of Directors considers whether there are any transactions and relationships between any director (and his or her immediate family and affiliates) and the Company and its management that are inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent in light of applicable law and listing standards. The Company believes that under the applicable rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange, Mr. Campbell, Ms. Poskon, and Ms. Borrack are independent. Mr. Franklin and Ms. Plum are not independent because they are officers of the Company.

~~Item 14.~~

~~Principal Accountant Fees and Services~~

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table summarizes fees paid to our independent registered public accounting firms (Cherry Bekaert LLP and Ernst & Young LLP) for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:


Type of Fee	2022		2021
Audit Fees (1)	$	282,000	$	641,000
Audit Related Fees		—		—
Tax Fees (2)		183,000		117,000
All Other Fees		—		—
Total	$	465,000	$	758,000

(1)

Audit fees were incurred for professional services in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements which are included in each of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, and certain accounting consultations.

(2)

Tax fees for 2022 and 2021 include tax compliance and preparation, and tax consulting services related to tax planning.

~~This item is incorporated by reference~~Prior to the ~~definitive proxy statement for~~completion of the ~~2020 Annual Meeting~~Merger with WHLR on August 22, 2022, Cedar's then-Audit Committee reviewed and approved the fees of ~~Shareholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.~~the Company's independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with its policies and procedures. Following the completion of the Merger, the Audit Committee was disbanded and WHLR's Audit Committee serves as the Company's audit committee, which reviewed and approved the 2022 fees of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with its policies and procedures.

Part IV

~~Part~~ IV

~~Item 15.~~

~~Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules~~

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

1. Financial Statements

~~(a)~~

~~1. Financial Statements~~

The response to this portion of Item 15 is included in Item 8 of this report.

~~Financial Statement Schedules~~

Financial Statement Schedules

The response to this portion of Item 15 is included in Item 8 of this report.

Exhibits


Item	3.	~~Exhibits~~

~~Item~~		Title or Description

~~3.1.a~~2.1.a		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2022, by and among Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., DRA Fund X-B LLC, and KPR Centers LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2022.*

2.1.b		First Amendment to Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2022, by and among the Seller Parties signature thereto, Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., DRA Fund X-B LLC and KPR Centers LLC.

2.1.c		Second Amendment to Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2022, by and among the Seller Parties signature thereto, Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., DRA Fund X-B LLC and KPR Centers LLC.

2.1.d		Third Amendment to Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2022, by and among the Seller Parties signature thereto, Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., DRA Fund X-B LLC and KPR Centers LLC.

2.2.a		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 2, 2022, by and among Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Wheeler Merger Sub, Inc., WHLR OP Merger Sub LLC, Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., and Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2022.*

2.2.b		First Amendment to Merger Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2022, by and among Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Wheeler Merger Sub, Inc., WHLR OP Merger Sub LLC, Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., and Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Annex B of the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 21, 2022.

2.2.c		Second Amendment to Merger Agreement, entered into as of August 9, 2022, by and among Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., WHLR Merger Sub, Inc., WHLR OP Merger Sub LLC, Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., and Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2022.

3.1.a		Articles of Incorporation of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

3.1.b		Articles Supplementary to Articles of Incorporation of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 8-A filed on August 18, 2017.

3.1.c		Articles Supplementary to Articles of Incorporation of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2017.

3.1.d		Articles Supplementary to Articles of Incorporation of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2017.

3.1.e		Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2018.

~~3.2~~3.1.f		Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2020.


Item		Title or Description

3.1.g		Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2020.

3.2		Amended and Restated By-laws of Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 8-K filed on ~~May 7, 2018.~~November 2, 2020.

~~3.3.a~~4.1		~~Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Shopping Centers Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of the Registration Statement on Form S-11/A filed on October 14, 2003.~~

~~3.3.b~~		Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Shopping Centers Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 of the Registration Statement on Form S-11/A filed on October 14, 2003.

~~3.3.c~~		~~Amendment No. 2 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Shopping Centers Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3.c of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.~~

~~3.3.d~~		~~Amendment No. 3 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Shopping Centers Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3.d of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.~~

~~3.3.e~~		Amendment No. 4 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Shopping Centers Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010.

~~3.3.f~~		~~Amendment No. 5 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 8-K filed on May 16, 2012.~~

~~3.3.g~~		~~Amendment No. 6 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2012.~~

~~3.3.h~~		~~Amendment No. 7 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 8-K filed on September 14, 2012.~~

~~3.3.i~~		~~Amendment No. 8 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2012.~~

~~3.3.j~~		~~Amendment No. 9 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2013.~~

~~3.3.k~~		~~Amendment No. 10 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2017.~~

~~Item~~		~~Title or Description~~
~~3.3.1~~		~~Amendment No. 11 to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2017.~~

~~4.1~~		Description of the Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

10.1.a*10.1		Loan Agreement, dated as of August 22, 2022, by and between Cedar Realty Trust ~~Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of~~Partnership, L.P., as Borrower, KeyBank National Association as Administrative Agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets as Lead Arranger and Bookrunner, and the ~~Definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 25, 2012.~~

10.1.b.1*		~~Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex A of the Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 23, 2017.~~

10.1.b.2*		~~First Amendment to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex A of the Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 29, 2019.~~

10.2.a*		~~2005 Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan,~~Lenders party thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2022.

10.2		Guaranty, dated August 22, 2022, made by Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2022.

10.3		Environmental Compliance and Indemnity Agreement, dated as of August 22, 2022, made by Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., and certain subsidiaries of Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2022.

10.4		Term Loan Agreement dated October 28, 2022, between Guggenheim Real Estate LLC and the Borrowers party thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2022.

10.5		Loan Agreement dated December 21, 2022, between Citi Real Estate Funding Inc and the Borrowers party thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, ~~2005.~~2022.

10.2.b*21.1		Amendment No. 1 to the 2005 Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of December 21, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.b of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

10.2.c*		Amendment No. 2 to the 2005 Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of December 11, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.c of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

10.2.d*		Amendment No. 3 to the 2005 Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of December 16, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.d of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

10.2.e*		Amendment No. 4 to the 2005 Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of June 30, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011.

10.2.f*		Amendment No. 5 to the 2005 Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of December 14, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.f of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

10.2.g*		Amendment No. 6 to the 2005 Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of December 12, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.g of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

10.2.h*		Amendment No. 7 to the 2005 Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of December 24, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2.h of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

10.3.a*		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. and Bruce J. Schanzer, dated effective as of June 15, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2018.

10.3.b*		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. and Philip Mays, dated effective as of June 6, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on January 3, 2019.

10.3.c*		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. and Robin McBride Zeigler, dated effective as of April 1, 2019, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2019.

~~10.4.a.1~~		Fourth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) by and among Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., KeyBank National Association and other lending institutions which are or may become parties to the Loan Agreement, and KeyBank National Association (as Administrative Agent), dated as of September 8, 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017.

~~10.4.a.2~~		~~First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018.~~

~~10.4.b~~		Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) by and among Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., KeyBank National Association and other lending institutions which are or may become parties to the Loan Agreement, and KeyBank National Association (as Administrative Agent), dated as of July 24, 2018 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018.

~~Item~~		~~Title or Description~~
~~10.4.c.1~~		Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) by and among Cedar Realty Trust Partnership, L.P., Regions Bank and other lending institutions which are or may become parties to the Loan Agreement, and KeyBank National Association (as Administrative Agent), dated as of April 26, 2016 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016.

~~10.4.c.2~~		~~First Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2016 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016.~~

~~10.4.c.3~~		~~Second Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018.~~

~~21.1~~		List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant

~~23.1~~31.1		~~Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~

~~31.1~~		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

32.2		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Item		Title or Description

101.INS		Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because iXBRLtags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104

		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

* Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, certain exhibits have been omitted. The registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any omitted exhibit to the SEC upon request by the SEC.

(b)

Exhibits

*	~~Management contracts or compensatory plans required to be filed pursuant to Rule 601 of Regulation S-K.~~

~~(b)~~

~~Exhibits~~

The response to this portion of Item 15 is included in Item 15(a)(3) above.

~~(c)~~

~~The following financial statement schedules are filed as part of the report:~~

(c)

The following financial statement schedules are filed as part of the report:

The response to this portion of Item 15 is included in Item 15(a)(2) above.

~~Item 16.~~

~~Form 10-K Summary~~

~~None~~

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary: None

~~SIGNATURES~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC.


/s/ ~~BRUCE J. SCHANZER~~M. ANDREW FRANKLIN		/s/ ~~PHILIP R. MAYS~~CRYSTAL PLUM
~~Bruce J. Schanzer~~M. Andrew Franklin		~~Philip R. Mays~~Crystal Plum
Chief Executive Officer and President (~~principal executive officer)~~Principal Executive Officer)		~~Executive Vice President,~~ Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and ~~Treasurer~~
		~~(principal financial officer)~~

~~/s/ GASPARE J. SAITTA, II~~
~~Gaspare J. Saitta, II~~
~~Vice President and Chief~~Principal Accounting ~~Officer~~
~~(principal accounting officer)~~		Officer)

~~February 13, 2020~~March 2, 2023

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and as of the date indicated.


/s/ ~~ABRAHAM EISENSTAT~~M. ANDREW FRANKLIN		/s/ ~~GREGG GONSALVES~~CRYSTAL PLUM
~~Abraham Eisenstat~~M. Andrew Franklin		~~Gregg Gonsalves~~Crystal Plum
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)		Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ ~~PAMELA N. HOOTKIN~~KERRY G. CAMPBELL		/s/ ~~SABRINA L. KANNER~~E.J. BORRACK
~~Pamela N. Hootkin~~Kerry G. Campbell		~~Sabrina L. Kanner~~E.J. Borrack
~~Director~~Chair of Board		Director

/s/ ~~STEVEN G. ROGERS~~PAULA J. POSKON		~~/s/ BRUCE J. SCHANZER~~
~~Steven G. Rogers~~Paula J. Poskon		~~Bruce J. Schanzer~~
Director		~~Director~~
~~/s/ ROGER M. WIDMANN~~
~~Roger M. Widmann~~
~~Director~~

~~February 13, 2020~~March 2, 2023


Maryland	42-1241468
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

~~44 South Bayles Avenue, Port Washington, NY~~2529 Virginia Beach Blvd. Virginia Beach, Virginia	~~11050-3765~~23452
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered	~~Trading Symbol(s)~~
~~Common Stock, $0.06 par value~~	~~New York Stock Exchange~~	~~CDR~~
7-1/4% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $25.00 Liquidation Value	CDRpB	New York Stock Exchange	~~CDRpB~~
6-1/2% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $25.00 Liquidation Value	CDRpC	New York Stock Exchange	~~CDRpC~~


																Annualized
				Total								Total				Base Rent
		Number		Leasable								Occupied		Annualized		per
		of		Square		Percentage			Percentage			Square		Base		Occupied
Property	Location	Tenants		Feet		Leased (1)			Occupied			Feet		Rent (2)		Square Foot
Brickyard Plaza	Berlin, CT		10		228,000		100.0	%		99.1	%		226,000	$	2,027,000	$	8.98
Carll's Corner	Bridgeton, NJ		5		129,000		27.5	%		20.9	%		27,000		400,000		14.63
Coliseum Marketplace	Hampton, VA		9		107,000		100.0	%		45.8	%		49,000		610,000		12.46
Fairview Commons	New Cumberland, PA		10		53,000		77.5	%		77.4	%		41,000		448,000		10.91
Fieldstone Marketplace	New Bedford, MA		10		194,000		85.5	%		71.6	%		139,000		1,652,000		11.87
Gold Star Plaza	Shenandoah, PA		6		72,000		97.8	%		97.2	%		70,000		641,000		9.14
Golden Triangle	Lancaster, PA		19		203,000		98.4	%		98.5	%		200,000		2,609,000		13.07
Hamburg Square	Hamburg, PA		7		102,000		100.0	%		100.0	%		102,000		684,000		6.70
Kings Plaza	New Bedford, MA		16		168,000		82.2	%		82.1	%		138,000		1,227,000		8.87
Oakland Commons	Bristol, CT		2		90,000		100.0	%		100.0	%		90,000		574,000		6.37
Oregon Avenue	Philadelphia, PA		1		20,000		100.0	%		5.0	%		1,000		40,000		34.21
Patuxent Crossing	California, MD		30		264,000		84.3	%		84.5	%		223,000		2,254,000		10.12
Pine Grove Plaza	Brown Mills, NJ		14		79,000		81.1	%		49.4	%		39,000		573,000		14.56
South Philadelphia	Philadelphia, PA		10		222,000		78.9	%		71.6	%		159,000		1,445,000		9.08
Southington Center	Southington, CT		10		156,000		100.0	%		98.7	%		154,000		1,172,000		7.64
Timpany Plaza	Gardner, MA		14		183,000		65.0	%		65.0	%		119,000		1,167,000		9.81
Trexler Mall	Trexlertown, PA		23		337,000		98.2	%		98.2	%		331,000		3,670,000		11.10
Washington Center Shoppes	Sewell, NJ		28		157,000		94.0	%		94.3	%		148,000		1,810,000		12.24
Webster Commons	Webster, MA		9		99,000		100.0	%		100.0	%		99,000		1,241,000		12.54
Total			233		2,863,000		86.2	%		82.3	%		2,355,000	$	24,244,000	$	10.30


				% of					Percent			Annualized
				Total			Total		Total			Base Rent
		Annualized		Annualized			Occupied		Leasable			per Occupied
Tenants	Category	Base Rent		Base Rent			Square Feet		Square Feet			Square Foot
TJX Companies (1)	Discount Retailer	$	1,162,000		4.8	%		133,000		4.6	%	$	8.74
Kohl's	Discount Retailer		1,031,000		4.2	%		147,000		5.1	%		7.01
Shaw's	Grocery		925,000		3.8	%		68,000		2.4	%		13.60
Dollar Tree (2)	Discount Retailer		845,000		3.5	%		96,000		3.4	%		8.80
Walmart	Grocery		843,000		3.5	%		150,000		5.2	%		5.62
Redner's	Grocery		747,000		3.1	%		106,000		3.7	%		7.05
Shoprite	Grocery		741,000		3.1	%		54,000		1.9	%		13.72
Home Depot	Home Improvement		700,000		2.9	%		103,000		3.6	%		6.80
Lehigh Valley Health	Medical		673,000		2.8	%		33,000		1.2	%		20.39
Urban Air	Entertainment		570,000		2.3	%		61,000		2.1	%		9.34
Total		$	8,237,000		34.0	%		951,000		33.2	%	$	8.66

			Percentage					Annualized		Percentage
	Occupied		of occupied			Annualized		base rent		annualized
	GLA		GLA			base rent		per sq. ft.		base rents
Large tenants		5,247,000		68.9	%	$	58,793,000	$	11.21		55.0	%
Small tenants		2,372,000		31.1	%		48,050,000		20.26		45.0	%
Total		7,619,000		100.0	%	$	106,843,000	$	14.02		100.0	%


Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒

Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐

		Emerging growth company	☐


PART I
1 and 2.	Business and Properties	4
1A.	Risk Factors	9
1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	20
3.	Legal Proceedings	20
4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	20

PART II
5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	20
6.	Selected Financial Data	20
7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21
7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	32
8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	33
9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	68
9A.	Controls and Procedures, including Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	68
9B.	Other Information	71
9C.	Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections	71

PART III
10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	71
11.	Executive Compensation	74
12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	80
13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	80
14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	81

PART IV
15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	82
16.	Form 10-K Summary	84

SIGNATURES		85

	Number of				Percentage
State	properties		GLA		of GLA
Pennsylvania		23		4,043,807		48.6	%
Connecticut		7		1,141,979		13.7	%
Massachusetts		7		1,122,616		13.5	%
Maryland / Washington, D.C.		8		972,525		11.7	%
Virginia		6		424,731		5.1	%
New Jersey		3		307,327		3.7	%
New York		1		195,485		2.3	%
Delaware		1		119,446		1.4	%
Total portfolio		56		8,327,916		100.0	%

								Average
	Year				Percent			base rent per		Major Tenants (a)
Property Description	acquired		GLA		occupied			leased sq. ft.		Name	GLA
Connecticut
Bethel Shopping Center		2013		101,105		95.1	%	$	23.39	Big Y		63,817
Brickyard Plaza		2004		227,598		99.2	%		8.75	Home Depot		103,003
										Kohl's		58,966
										Michaels		21,429
										PetSmart		20,405
Groton Shopping Center		2007		130,264		100.0	%		12.42	TJ Maxx		30,000
										Goodwill		21,306
										Aldi		17,664
										Planet Fitness		17,500
Jordan Lane		2005		177,504		74.5	%		12.81	Stop & Shop		60,632
										Crunch Fitness		20,283
New London Mall		2009		259,566		93.4	%		14.97	Shop Rite		64,017
										Marshalls		30,627
										Home Goods		25,432
										PetSmart		23,500
										A.C. Moore		20,932
Oakland Commons		2007		90,100		100.0	%		6.37	Walmart		54,911
										Bristol Ten Pin		35,189
Southington Center		2003		155,842		98.5	%		7.85	Walmart		95,482
										NAMCO		20,000
Total Connecticut				1,141,979		93.7	%		12.09

Delaware
Christina Crossing		2017		119,446		90.7	%		19.36	Shop Rite		68,621

Maryland / Washington, D.C.
East River Park		2015		150,038		97.4	%		22.03	Safeway		40,000
										District of Columbia		34,400
Metro Square		2008		71,896		100.0	%		18.66	Shoppers Food Warehouse		58,668
Oakland Mills		2005		59,308		89.3	%		11.68	LA Mart		39,279
San Souci Plaza (b)		2009		264,134		82.3	%		11.38	Shoppers Food Warehouse		61,466
										Marshalls		27,000
										Home Goods		19,688
										World Gym		15,612
Senator Square		2018		61,691		100.0	%		21.11	Unity Health Care		18,750
Shoppes at Arts District		2016		35,676		100.0	%		36.76	Busboys and Poets		9,889
										Yes! Organic Market		7,169
Valley Plaza		2003		190,939		100.0	%		5.94	K-Mart		95,810
										Ollie's Bargain Outlet		41,888
										Tractor Supply		32,095
Yorktowne Plaza		2007		138,843		74.6	%		13.31	Food Lion		37,692
Total Maryland / Washington, D.C.				972,525		90.5	%		14.52

Massachusetts
Fieldstone Marketplace	2005/2012			150,123		78.8	%		12.32	Shaw's		68,000
										Work Out World		32,250
Franklin Village Plaza	2004/2012			303,524		90.1	%		21.12	Stop & Shop		75,000
										Marshalls		26,890
										Boost Fitness		15,807
Kings Plaza		2007		168,243		81.0	%		8.63	Fun Z Trampoline Park		42,997
										Ocean State Job Lot		20,300
										Savers		19,339
Norwood Shopping Center		2006		97,756		96.1	%		10.10	Big Y		42,598
										Planet Fitness		18,830
										Dollar Tree		16,798
The Shops at Suffolk Downs		2005		121,187		100.0	%		14.07	Stop & Shop		74,977


	Years ended December 31,
Balance sheet data:	2019			2018			2017			2016			2015

Real estate, net	$	1,125,345,000		$	1,146,713,000		$	1,192,656,000		$	1,183,359,000		$	1,249,195,000
Real estate held for sale/conveyance		13,230,000			11,592,000			-			-			14,402,000
Other assets		67,050,000			64,596,000			59,762,000			50,162,000			54,783,000
Total assets	$	1,205,625,000		$	1,222,901,000		$	1,252,418,000		$	1,233,521,000		$	1,318,380,000

Debt obligations	$	630,575,000		$	624,834,000		$	580,125,000		$	607,745,000		$	673,820,000
Other liabilities		60,975,000			39,351,000			42,182,000			43,779,000			47,018,000
Total liabilities		691,550,000			664,185,000			622,307,000			651,524,000			720,838,000

Equity:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. shareholders' equity		510,561,000			555,425,000			628,336,000			580,740,000			596,050,000
Noncontrolling interests		3,514,000			3,291,000			1,775,000			1,257,000			1,492,000
Total equity		514,075,000			558,716,000			630,111,000			581,997,000			597,542,000

Total liabilities and equity	$	1,205,625,000		$	1,222,901,000		$	1,252,418,000		$	1,233,521,000		$	1,318,380,000

Other data:
Funds From Operations ("FFO") (a)	$	42,073,000		$	45,241,000		$	40,032,000		$	41,067,000		$	45,104,000
Operating Funds From Operations ("Operating FFO") (a)	$	40,769,000		$	53,577,000		$	48,325,000		$	49,241,000		$	46,447,000

Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	53,675,000		$	57,900,000		$	57,093,000		$	59,247,000		$	59,136,000
Investing activities	$	(22,342,000	)	$	(14,938,000	)	$	(45,497,000	)	$	48,763,000		$	(47,876,000	)
Financing activities	$	(30,563,000	)	$	(48,204,000	)	$	(10,139,000	)	$	(109,923,000	)	$	(12,676,000	)

Square feet of GLA		8,328,000			8,729,000			9,010,000			9,128,000			9,459,000
Percent occupied		91.5	%		90.7	%		91.3	%		89.9	%		90.5	%
Average annualized base rent per square foot	$	14.02		$	13.78		$	13.51		$	13.50		$	13.35

		Principal payoff
Property	Repayment date	amount
East River Park	August 10, 2018	$	18,772,000
Colonial Commons	August 24, 2018	$	24,108,000
Shoppes at Arts District	August 24, 2018	$	8,114,000
The Point	September 6, 2018	$	27,003,000


							Change				Years ended December 31,						Change
	2019			2018			Dollars			Percent	2022			2021			Dollars			Percent
Revenues	$	144,083,000		$	152,020,000		$	(7,937,000	)	-5.2%	$	34,005,000		$	39,187,000		$	(5,182,000	)	-13.2%
Property operating expenses		(48,347,000	)		(47,894,000	)		(453,000	)	0.9%		(14,068,000	)		(13,888,000	)		(180,000	)	1.3%
Property operating income		95,736,000			104,126,000			(8,390,000	)			19,937,000			25,299,000			(5,362,000	)
General and administrative		(18,804,000	)		(16,915,000	)		(1,889,000	)	11.2%		(10,099,000	)		(17,811,000	)		7,712,000		-43.3%
Depreciation and amortization		(45,861,000	)		(40,053,000	)		(5,808,000	)	14.5%		(9,645,000	)		(12,141,000	)		2,496,000		-20.6%
Gain on sales		2,942,000			4,864,000			(1,922,000	)	n/a		—			48,857,000			(48,857,000	)	n/a
Impairment charges		(8,938,000	)		(20,689,000	)		11,751,000		n/a		(9,350,000	)		(65,975,000	)		56,625,000		n/a
Interest expense		(23,509,000	)		(22,146,000	)		(1,363,000	)	6.2%
Early extinguishment of debt costs		—			(4,829,000	)		4,829,000		n/a
Net income		1,566,000			4,358,000			(2,792,000	)
Net (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		(490,000	)		(469,000	)		(21,000	)
Net income attributable to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.	$	1,076,000		$	3,889,000		$	(2,813,000	)

Transaction costs												(58,959,000	)		—			(58,959,000	)	n/a
Interest expense, net												(10,894,000	)		(13,901,000	)		3,007,000		-21.6%
Loss from continuing operations												(79,010,000	)		(35,672,000	)		(43,338,000	)
Discontinued operations:
Income from operations												14,302,000			23,535,000			(9,233,000	)	-39.2%
Impairment charges												(16,629,000	)		(33,913,000	)		17,284,000		n/a
Gain on sales												125,500,000			1,047,000			124,453,000		n/a
Net income (loss)												44,163,000			(45,003,000	)		89,166,000
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests												(132,000	)		(96,000	)		(36,000	)	n/a
Net income (loss) attributable to Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.											$	44,031,000		$	(45,099,000	)	$	89,130,000


	Three months ended			Six months ended
	December 31, 2022			December 31, 2022
Renewals (a):
Leases renewed with rate increase (sq feet)		81,904			124,875
Leases renewed with rate decrease (sq feet)		-			29,223
Leases renewed with no rate change (sq feet)		64,950			64,950
Total leases renewed (sq feet)		146,854			219,048

Leases renewed with rate increase (count)		4			12
Leases renewed with rate decrease (count)		-			2
Leases renewed with no rate change (count)		3			3
Total leases renewed (count)		7			17

Option exercised (count)		1			2

Weighted average on rate increases (per sq foot)	$	2.43		$	1.91
Weighted average on rate decreases (per sq foot)	$	-		$	(0.28	)
Weighted average on all renewals (per sq foot)	$	1.36		$	1.05

Weighted average change over prior rates		14.35	%		10.26	%

New Leases (a) (b):
New leases (sq feet)		120,853			159,213
New leases (count)		9			14
Weighted average rate (per sq foot)	$	11.04		$	10.70

												Tenant
					New rent		Prior rent		Cash basis			improvements
	Leases				per		per		%			per
	signed		GLA		sq.ft. ($)		sq.ft. ($)		change			sq.ft. ($)
Renewals		113		1,388,700		12.35		12.28		0.5	%		0.99
New Leases - Comparable		42		327,600		11.67		10.61		10.1	%		48.96	(a)
New Leases - Non-Comparable (b)		7		25,800		33.06	n/a		n/a				31.20	(a)
Total (c)		162		1,742,100		12.53	n/a		n/a				10.55

			December 31, 2019
						Contractual
	Maturity		Balance			interest rates
Description	dates		outstanding			weighted-average
Fixed-rate mortgage	Jun 2026		$	46,679,000		3.9%
Finance lease obligation	Sep 2050			5,665,000		5.3%
Unsecured credit facilities (a):
Variable-rate:
Revolving credit facility	Sep 2021	(b)		106,000,000		3.2%
Term loan	Sep 2022			50,000,000		3.3%
Fixed-rate (c):
Term loan	Feb 2021			75,000,000		3.6%
Term loan	Feb 2022			50,000,000		3.0%
Term loan	Sep 2022	(d)		50,000,000		2.8%
Term loan	Apr 2023			100,000,000		3.2%
Term loan	Sep 2024			75,000,000		3.7%
Term loan	Jul 2025			75,000,000		4.6%
				633,344,000		3.5%
Unamortized issuance costs				(2,769,000	)
			$	630,575,000

	Number									Annualized		Percentage
	of				Percentage			Annualized		base rent		annualized
Tenant	stores		GLA		of GLA			base rent		per sq. ft.		base rents
Top twenty tenants (a):
Giant Foods		8		538,000		6.5	%	$	9,007,000	$	16.74		8.4	%
Shop Rite		4		252,000		3.0	%		4,401,000		17.46		4.1	%
Stop & Shop		3		211,000		2.5	%		2,786,000		13.20		2.6	%
Dollar Tree		21		224,000		2.7	%		2,391,000		10.67		2.2	%
LA Fitness		4		158,000		1.9	%		2,110,000		13.35		2.0	%
Big Y		2		106,000		1.3	%		2,006,000		18.92		1.9	%
Home Depot		2		253,000		3.0	%		1,977,000		7.81		1.9	%
Staples		5		106,000		1.3	%		1,773,000		16.73		1.7	%
BJ's Wholesale Club		1		118,000		1.4	%		1,760,000		14.92		1.6	%
Marshalls		6		170,000		2.0	%		1,558,000		9.16		1.5	%
United Artists		1		78,000		0.9	%		1,538,000		19.72		1.4	%
Food Lion		4		163,000		2.0	%		1,530,000		9.39		1.4	%
Shoppers Food Warehouse		2		120,000		1.4	%		1,297,000		10.81		1.2	%
Planet Fitness		5		99,000		1.2	%		1,279,000		12.92		1.2	%
Walmart		3		192,000		2.3	%		1,193,000		6.21		1.1	%
Redner's		3		159,000		1.9	%		1,160,000		7.30		1.1	%
Kohl's		2		147,000		1.8	%		1,031,000		7.01		1.0	%
Home Goods		4		105,000		1.3	%		999,000		9.51		0.9	%
PetSmart		3		63,000		0.8	%		971,000		15.41		0.9	%
Shaw's		1		68,000		0.8	%		925,000		13.60		0.9	%
Sub-total top twenty tenants		84		3,330,000		40.0	%		41,692,000		12.52		39.0	%
Remaining tenants		732		4,289,000		51.5	%		65,151,000		15.19		61.0	%
Sub-total all tenants (b)		816		7,619,000		91.5	%	$	106,843,000	$	14.02		100.0	%
Vacant space	N/A			709,000		8.5	%
Total		816		8,328,000		100.0	%

										Annualized		Percentage
	Number				Percentage			Annualized		expiring		of annualized										% of Total
Year of lease	of leases		GLA		of GLA			expiring		base rents		expiring
expiration	expiring		expiring		expiring			base rents		per sq. ft.		base rents
																	Total		% of Total			Occupied								Expiring
															Number of		Expiring		Expiring			Square			Expiring		% of Total			Base Rent
															Expiring		Square		Square			Footage			Annualized		Annualized			per Occupied
Lease Expiration Period															Leases		Footage		Footage			Expiring			Base Rent		Base Rent			Square Foot
Available																—		508,000		17.7	%	n/a			n/a		n/a			n/a
Month-To-Month		50		273,000		3.6	%	$	4,865,000	$	17.82		4.6	%		9		43,000		1.5	%		1.8	%		563,000		2.3	%	$	13.09
2020		90		548,000		7.2	%		8,786,000		16.03		8.2	%
2021		134		864,000		11.3	%		14,358,000		16.62		13.4	%
2022		105		593,000		7.8	%		9,705,000		16.37		9.1	%
2023		77		580,000		7.6	%		8,275,000		14.27		7.7	%		22		104,000		3.6	%		4.4	%		1,731,000		7.1	%		16.64
2024		92		874,000		11.5	%		11,526,000		13.19		10.8	%		30		217,000		7.6	%		9.2	%		3,000,000		12.4	%		13.82
2025		82		1,094,000		14.4	%		14,401,000		13.16		13.5	%		34		354,000		12.4	%		15.0	%		3,016,000		12.4	%		8.52
2026		34		283,000		3.7	%		4,571,000		16.15		4.3	%		25		106,000		3.7	%		4.5	%		1,642,000		6.8	%		15.49
2027		34		272,000		3.6	%		3,828,000		14.07		3.6	%		32		270,000		9.4	%		11.5	%		3,030,000		12.5	%		11.22
2028		36		377,000		4.9	%		4,542,000		12.05		4.3	%		25		457,000		16.0	%		19.4	%		4,111,000		17.0	%		9.00
2029		41		700,000		9.2	%		8,948,000		12.78		8.4	%		19		250,000		8.7	%		10.6	%		2,201,000		9.1	%		8.80
2030		18		513,000		6.7	%		4,935,000		9.62		4.6	%		9		155,000		5.4	%		6.6	%		917,000		3.8	%		5.92
Thereafter		23		648,000		8.5	%		8,103,000		12.50		7.6	%
All tenants		816		7,619,000		100.0	%	$	106,843,000	$	14.02		100.0	%
Vacant space	N/A			709,000	N/A
Total portfolio		816		8,328,000	N/A

2031																6		77,000		2.7	%		3.3	%		900,000		3.7	%		11.69
2032 & thereafter																22		322,000		11.3	%		13.7	%		3,133,000		12.9	%		9.73
Total																233		2,863,000		100.0	%		100.0	%	$	24,244,000		100.0	%	$	10.30


	Mortgage Loan		Finance Lease		Revolving			Term				Unamortized
Year	Payable		Obligation		Credit Facility			Loans		Total		Issuance Costs			Total
2020	$	1,034,000	$	33,000	$	-		$	-	$	1,067,000	$	(767,000	)	$	300,000
2021		1,074,000		35,000		106,000,000	(a)		75,000,000		182,109,000		(648,000	)		181,461,000
2022		1,116,000		37,000		-			150,000,000		151,153,000		(499,000	)		150,654,000
2023		1,160,000		39,000		-			100,000,000		101,199,000		(274,000	)		100,925,000
2024		1,206,000		41,000		-			75,000,000		76,247,000		(207,000	)		76,040,000
Thereafter		41,089,000		5,480,000		-			75,000,000		121,569,000		(374,000	)		121,195,000
	$	46,679,000	$	5,665,000	$	106,000,000		$	475,000,000	$	633,344,000	$	(2,769,000	)	$	630,575,000

		Date	Sales		Gain on
Property	Location	Sold	Price		Sale
2019
Maxatawny Marketplace	Maxatawny, PA	2/15/2019	$	10,330,000	$	101,000
Fort Washington Center	Fort Washington, PA	6/26/2019		9,048,000		2,841,000
			$	19,378,000	$	2,942,000
2018
Mechanicsburg Center	Mechanicsburg, PA	8/28/2018	$	16,100,000	$	4,864,000
West Bridgewater Plaza	West Bridgewater, MA	9/28/2018		3,500,000		-
			$	19,600,000	$	4,864,000
2017
Outparcel Building adjacent to Camp Hill	Camp Hill, PA	2/1/2017	$	10,650,000	$	7,099,000
Fredericksburg Way	Fredericksburg, VA	12/29/2017		2,200,000		-
			$	12,850,000	$	7,099,000

			December 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
						Contractual				Contractual
	Maturity		Balance			interest rates	Balance			interest rates
Description	dates		outstanding			weighted-average	outstanding			weighted-average
Fixed-rate mortgage	Jun 2026		$	46,679,000		3.9%	$	47,674,000		3.9%
Finance lease obligation	Sep 2050			5,665,000		5.3%		5,696,000		5.3%
Unsecured credit facilities (a):
Variable-rate:
Revolving credit facility	Sep 2021	(b)		106,000,000		3.2%		100,000,000		3.8%
Term loan	Sep 2022			50,000,000		3.3%		50,000,000		3.8%
Fixed-rate (c):
Term loan	Feb 2021			75,000,000		3.6%		75,000,000		3.6%
Term loan	Feb 2022			50,000,000		3.0%		50,000,000		3.0%
Term loan	Sep 2022	(d)		50,000,000		2.8%		50,000,000		2.8%
Term loan	Apr 2023			100,000,000		3.2%		100,000,000		3.2%
Term loan	Sep 2024			75,000,000		3.7%		75,000,000		3.3%
Term loan	Jul 2025			75,000,000		4.6%		75,000,000		4.6%
				633,344,000		3.5%		628,370,000		3.6%
Unamortized issuance costs				(2,769,000	)			(3,536,000	)
			$	630,575,000			$	624,834,000

Amount		Maturity date	Interest range
$	75,000,000	February 2021	LIBOR + 130 bps to 190 bps
$	50,000,000	February 2022	LIBOR + 130 bps to 190 bps
$	50,000,000	September 2022	LIBOR + 130 bps to 190 bps
$	100,000,000	April 2023	LIBOR + 165 bps to 225 bps
$	75,000,000	September 2024	LIBOR + 170 bps to 225 bps


		(Loss) gain recognized in other
		comprehensive income (loss)
		(effective portion)
Designation/		Years ended December 31,
Cash flow	Derivative	2022			2021			2020
Qualifying	Interest rate swaps	$	6,001,000		$	4,148,000		$	(17,940,000	)

		(Loss) recognized in other
		comprehensive income (loss)
		reclassified into earnings (effective portion)
		Years ended December 31,
	Classification	2022			2021			2020
	Continuing Operations	$	(2,320,000	)	$	(6,476,000	)	$	(6,062,000	)

		(Loss) gain recognized in other
		comprehensive (loss) income
		(effective portion)
Designation/		Years ended December 31,
Cash flow	Derivative	2019			2018		2017
Qualifying	Interest rate swaps	$	(13,090,000	)	$	2,185,000	$	2,492,000

		Gain (loss) recognized in other
		comprehensive (loss) income
		reclassified into earnings (effective portion)
		Years ended December 31,
	Classification	2019			2018		2017
	Continuing Operations	$	1,196,000		$	667,000	$	(2,345,000	)


2023	$	416,000
2024		250,000
2025		236,000
2026		236,000
2027		236,000
Thereafter		1,704,000
	$	3,078,000

2020	$	1,095,000
2021		956,000
2022		955,000
2023		956,000
2024		956,000
Thereafter		29,511,000
Total undiscounted future minimum lease payments		34,429,000
Future minimum lease payments, discount		(20,651,000	)
Right-of-use liabilities	$	13,778,000


	Series B		Series C
	Preferred Stock		Preferred Stock
Par value	$	0.01	$	0.01
Liquidation value	$	25.00	$	25.00

	December 31, 2022				December 31, 2021
	Series B		Series C		Series B		Series C
	Preferred Stock		Preferred Stock		Preferred Stock		Preferred Stock
Shares authorized		1,450,000		6,450,000		1,450,000		6,450,000
Shares issued and outstanding		1,450,000		5,000,000		1,450,000		5,000,000
Balance	$	34,767,000	$	124,774,000	$	34,767,000	$	124,774,000

2020	$	98,931,000
2021		88,888,000
2022		77,176,000

2023		70,248,000	$	23,961,000
2024		59,957,000		23,133,000
2025				20,845,000
2026				18,550,000
2027				16,313,000
Thereafter		208,157,000		54,132,000
	$	603,357,000	$	156,934,000


	Quarter ended
	March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31
2022
Revenues	$	8,278,000		$	8,503,000		$	7,984,000		$	9,240,000
Net (loss) income	$	(1,057,000	)	$	(42,587,000	)	$	89,309,000		$	(1,634,000	)
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders	$	(3,745,000	)	$	(45,275,000	)	$	86,621,000		$	(4,322,000	)
Per common share (basic and diluted) - continuing operations	$	(0.71	)	$	(2.78	)	$	(2.87	)	$	(0.28	)
Per common share (basic and diluted) - discontinued operations	$	0.43		$	(0.63	)	$	9.29		$	0.03
Per common share (basic and diluted) - total	$	(0.28	)	$	(3.41	)	$	6.42		$	(0.25	)

2021
Revenues	$	10,935,000		$	10,844,000		$	8,495,000		$	8,913,000
Net income (loss)	$	1,112,000		$	51,055,000		$	(80,516,000	)	$	(16,750,000	)
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders	$	(1,576,000	)	$	48,367,000		$	(83,204,000	)	$	(19,438,000	)
Per common share (basic and diluted) - continuing operations	$	(0.60	)	$	3.11		$	(4.97	)	$	(1.07	)
Per common share (basic and diluted) - discontinued operations	$	0.49		$	0.41		$	(1.31	)	$	(0.30	)
Per common share (basic and diluted) - total	$	(0.11	)	$	3.52		$	(6.28	)	$	(1.37	)

					Year built/		Gross		Initial cost to the Company
		Year		Percent	Year last		leasable				Building and
Property	State	acquired		owned	renovated		area		Land		Improvements
Academy Plaza	PA		2001	100%	1965/2013			137,415	$	2,406,000	$	9,623,000
Big Y Shopping Center	CT		2013	100%		2007		101,105		11,272,000		23,395,000
Camp Hill	PA		2002	100%	1958/2005			430,198		4,460,000		17,857,000
Carmans Plaza	NY		2007	100%	1954/2007			195,485		8,539,000		35,804,000
Christina Crossing	DE		2017	100%		2008		119,446		4,341,000		23,227,000
Coliseum Marketplace	VA		2005	100%	1987/2012			106,648		2,924,000		14,416,000
Colonial Commons	PA		2011	100%	2011/2013			410,432		9,367,000		37,496,000
Crossroads II	PA		2008	60%		2009		133,717		15,383,000		-
East River Park	DC		2015	100%	1946-1996			150,038		9,143,000		30,893,000
Elmhurst Square	VA		2006	100%	1961-1983			66,254		1,371,000		5,994,000
Fairview Commons	PA		2007	100%	1976/2003			52,964		858,000		3,568,000
Fieldstone Marketplace	MA	2005/2012		100%	1988/2003			150,123		5,229,000		21,440,000
Fishtown Crossing (f/k/a Port Richmond Village)	PA		2001	100%		1988		120,375		2,942,000		11,769,000
Franklin Village Plaza (a)	MA	2004/2012		100%	1987/2005			303,524		14,270,000		61,915,000
General Booth Plaza	VA		2005	100%		1985		71,639		1,935,000		9,493,000
Girard Plaza	PA		2019	100%				35,688		4,685,000		4,648,000
Glen Allen Shopping Center	VA		2005	100%		2000		63,328		6,769,000		683,000
Gold Star Plaza	PA		2006	100%		1988		71,720		1,644,000		6,519,000
Golden Triangle	PA		2003	100%	1960/2005			202,790		2,320,000		9,713,000
Groton Shopping Center	CT		2007	100%		1969		130,264		3,070,000		12,320,000
Halifax Plaza	PA		2003	100%		1994		51,510		1,412,000		5,799,000
Hamburg Square	PA		2004	100%	1993/2010			102,058		1,153,000		4,678,000
Jordan Lane	CT		2005	100%	1969/1991			177,504		4,291,000		21,176,000
Kempsville Crossing	VA		2005	100%	1985/2013			78,162		2,207,000		11,000,000
Kings Plaza	MA		2007	100%	1970/1994			168,243		2,413,000		12,604,000
Lawndale Plaza	PA		2015	100%		1998		92,773		3,635,000		21,854,000
Meadows Marketplace	PA	2004/2012		100%		2005		91,518		1,914,000		-
Metro Square	MD		2008	100%		1999		71,896		3,121,000		12,341,000
Newport Plaza	PA		2003	100%		1996		64,489		1,721,000		7,758,000
New London Mall	CT		2009	100%	1967/1997			259,566		14,891,000		24,967,000
Northside Commons	PA		2008	100%		2009		69,136		3,332,000		-
Norwood Shopping Center	MA		2006	100%	1965/2013			97,756		1,874,000		8,453,000
Oak Ridge Shopping Center	VA		2006	100%		2000		38,700		960,000		4,254,000
Oakland Commons	CT		2007	100%	1962/2013			90,100		2,504,000		15,662,000
Oakland Mills	MD		2005	100%	1960's/2004			59,308		1,611,000		6,292,000
Palmyra Shopping Center	PA		2005	100%	1960/2012			111,051		1,488,000		6,566,000
Pine Grove Plaza	NJ		2003	100%	2001/2002			86,089		2,010,000		6,489,000
Quartermaster Plaza	PA		2014	100%		2004		456,602		37,031,000		54,210,000
River View Plaza	PA		2003	100%	1991/1998			189,032		9,718,000		40,356,000
San Souci Plaza	MD		2009	40%	1985 - 1997			264,134		14,849,000		18,445,000
Senator Square	DC		2018	100%	1946 - 2005			61,691		-		5,327,000
Shoppes at Arts District	DC		2016	100%		2011		35,676		2,247,000		18,616,000
South Philadelphia	PA		2003	100%	1950/2003			194,435		8,222,000		36,314,000
Southington Center	CT		2003	100%	1972/2000			155,842		-		11,834,000
Swede Square	PA		2003	100%	1980/2012			100,816		2,268,000		6,232,000
The Brickyard	CT		2004	100%	1990/2012			227,598		7,632,000		29,308,000
The Point	PA		2000	100%	1972/2012			262,620		2,700,000		10,800,000
The Shops at Bloomfield Station	NJ		2016	100%		2015		63,844		625,000		17,674,000
The Shops at Suffolk Downs	MA		2005	100%	2005/2011			121,187		7,580,000		11,089,000
Timpany Plaza	MA		2007	100%	1970's-1989			182,799		3,412,000		19,240,000
Trexler Mall	PA		2005	100%	1973/2013			337,297		6,932,000		32,815,000
Trexlertown Plaza	PA		2006	100%	1990/2011			325,171		13,349,000		23,867,000
Valley Plaza	MD		2003	100%	1975/1994			190,939		1,950,000		7,766,000
Washington Center Shoppes	NJ		2001	100%	1979/1995			157,394		2,061,000		7,314,000
Webster Plaza	MA		2007	100%	1960's-2004			98,984		3,551,000		18,412,000
Yorktowne Plaza	MD		2007	100%	1970/2000			138,843		5,940,000		25,505,000
Other	n/a	n/a		100%	n/a			-		1,965,000		-
Total Portfolio								8,327,916	$	295,497,000	$	905,790,000


				Gross amount at which carried at
(continued)	Subsequent			December 31, 2022
	cost					Building and				Accumulated
Property	capitalized (a)			Land		improvements		Total		depreciation
Brickyard Plaza		(779,000	)		7,648,000		28,513,000		36,161,000		13,850,000
Carll's Corner	$	(11,815,000	)	$	246,000	$	6,266,000	$	6,512,000	$	5,321,000
Coliseum Marketplace		(4,860,000	)		3,586,000		8,894,000		12,480,000		7,091,000
Fairview Commons		462,000			858,000		4,030,000		4,888,000		1,801,000
Fieldstone Marketplace		(3,219,000	)		5,167,000		18,283,000		23,450,000		12,069,000
Gold Star Plaza		(140,000	)		1,644,000		6,379,000		8,023,000		2,840,000
Golden Triangle		12,345,000			2,320,000		22,058,000		24,378,000		11,429,000
Hamburg Square		6,573,000			1,153,000		11,251,000		12,404,000		4,902,000
Kings Plaza		1,915,000			2,408,000		14,524,000		16,932,000		5,460,000
Oakland Commons		(4,668,000	)		2,504,000		10,994,000		13,498,000		6,450,000
Patuxent Crossing		1,835,000			13,211,000		21,918,000		35,129,000		10,679,000
Pine Grove Plaza		632,000			1,622,000		7,509,000		9,131,000		3,849,000
Oregon Avenue		(16,980,000	)		2,141,000		1,742,000		3,883,000		358,000
South Philadelphia		(9,764,000	)		8,222,000		26,550,000		34,772,000		21,389,000
Southington Center		1,464,000			-		13,298,000		13,298,000		6,208,000
Timpany Plaza		(4,845,000	)		3,368,000		14,439,000		17,807,000		7,953,000
Trexler Mall		13,720,000			6,932,000		46,535,000		53,467,000		19,962,000
Washington Centers Shoppes		7,513,000			2,000,000		14,888,000		16,888,000		7,241,000
Webster Commons		(1,518,000	)		4,081,000		16,364,000		20,445,000		8,447,000
Other		(1,401,000	)		-		564,000		564,000		169,000
Total Portfolio	$	(13,530,000	)	$	69,111,000	$	294,999,000	$	364,110,000	$	157,468,000