UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192022

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-16633

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.L.L.L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

MISSOURI

43-1450818

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

12555 Manchester Road

Des Peres, Missouri63131

(Address of principal executive office)

(Zip Code)

(314) (314) 515-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

None

N/A

N/A

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Limited Partnership Interests

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES  Yes    NO  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES  Yes    NO  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES  Yes    NO  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). YES  Yes    NO  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

As of February 28, 202024, 2023 (most recent month end), 1,248,2231,776,754 units of limited partnership interest (“Interests”) were outstanding, each representing $1,000 of limited partner capital. There is no public or private market for such Interests.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None


THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I

Item 1

Business

3

Item 1A

Risk Factors

1215

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

2528

Item 2

Properties

2528

Item 3

Legal Proceedings

2528

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

2528

PART II

Item 5

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

2628

Item 6

Selected Financial Data[Reserved]

2628

Item 7

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2729

Item 7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

4243

Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4344

Item 9

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

7173

Item 9A

Controls and Procedures

7173

Item 9B

Other Information

7173

Item 9C

Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

73

PART III

PART III

Item 10

Item 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

7274

Item 11

Executive Compensation

7881

Item 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

8083

Item 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

8083

Item 14

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

8184

PART IV

Item 15

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

8285

Item 16

Form 10-K Summary

8286

Signatures

8588

2


PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. (“JFC”) is a registered limited liability limited partnership organized under the Missouri Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. Unless expressly stated, or the context otherwise requires, the terms “Registrant”, “Partnership” and “Partnership”"Firm" refer to JFC and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. The Partnership’s principal operating subsidiary, Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (“Edward Jones”), was organized in February 1941 and reorganized as a limited partnership in May 1969. JFC was organized in June 1987 and, along with Edward Jones, was reorganized in August 1987.

As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership operates in two geographic segments, the United States (“U.S.”) and Canada. Edward Jones is a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser in the U.S., and one of Edward Jones’ subsidiaries, Edward Jones (an Ontario limited partnership) ("EJ Canada") is a registered broker-dealer in Canada. JFC is the ultimate parent company of Edward Jones and is a holding company. Edward Jones is a retail brokerage business and primarily derives revenues from fees for providing investment advisory and other account services to its clients, fees for assets held by clients and commissions for the distribution of mutual fund shares and commissions forinsurance products and the purchase or sale of securities and the purchase of insurance products.  securities.The Partnership conducts business throughout the U.S. and Canada with its clients, various brokers, dealers, clearing organizations, depositories and banks.

Edward Jones celebrated its Centennial year in 2022, serving more than 8 million clients in the U.S. and Canada. The PartnershipPartnership's purpose is to partner for positive impact to improve the lives of its clients and colleagues and together, better its communities and society. The Firm strives to help serious, long-term investors achieve their financial goals by understanding their needs and implementing tailored solutions.

To support long-term growth objectives and deliver enhanced value and impact for millions of current and potential clients, as well as the Partnership's colleagues and communities, Edward Jones has and is continuing to make significant investments in financial advisors and other human capital, technology infrastructure, digital initiatives, virtual enablement tools, strategic relationships and test and learn pilot programs. With these initiatives, the Partnership aspires to provide more comprehensive goals-based advice to clients to plan for their futures by understanding what is most important to clientsthem and why, and connecting advice to those goals,goals.

The Partnership is focused on:

growing the number of financial advisors and ispreparing branch teams to deliver enhanced experiences for clients, including investing in strategic initiativescolleague training and acumen building;
delivering more value to enhance the client experience. 

clients and branch teams with enhanced tools and modernized technology; and
supporting clients to help them stay focused and on track toward their goals during turbulent markets

For financial information related to segments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017,2020, see Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

Organizational Structure.

AtAs of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership was organized as follows:

img173102367_0.jpg 

For additional information aboutSee Exhibit 21.1 for a listing of the Partnership’s other subsidiaries and affiliates, see Exhibit 21.1.  affiliates.

Branch Office Network.The Partnership primarily serves serious, long-term individual investors through its extensive network of branch offices. The Partnership's business model is designed to serve clients through personal relationships with financial advisors and branch office administratorsteam support members ("BOAs"BTSMs") located in the communities where clients live and work. Financial advisors and BOAsBTSMs provide tailored solutions and services to clients while leveraging the resources of the Partnership's home office. The Partnership operated 15,04415,769 branch offices as of December 31, 2019,2022, primarily staffed by a single financial advisor and a BOA.  Of this total, the Partnership operated 14,369BTSM: 15,104 branch offices in the U.S. (located in all 50 states) and 675665 branch offices in Canada. The Partnership has continued executing its strategy to grow and promote branch team success and has begun offering options for greater flexibility, autonomy and choice to its financial advisors including co-locating branches with one or more financial advisors in shared office space while maintaining individual client relationships, an expanded variety of branch support roles, and a pilot of multi-financial advisor team models. This is part of a larger focus on strengthening the Partnership's colleague experience and capabilities while growing and retaining talent needed to deliver on the work of the Partnership.

4


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

Governance. Unlike a corporation, the Partnership is not governed by a board of directors and has no individuals who are designated as directors. Moreover, none of its securities are listed on a securities exchange and therefore certain governance requirements that generally apply to many companies that file periodic reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) do not apply to it. Under the terms of the Partnership’s TwentiethTwenty-First Amended and Restated Agreement of Registered Limited Liability Limited Partnership, dated August 6, 2018,September 1, 2021, (the “Partnership Agreement”), the Partnership’s Managing Partner (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) has primary responsibility for administering the Partnership’s business, determining its policies, and controlling the management and conduct of the Partnership's business. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Managing Partner's powers include, without limitation, the power to admit and dismiss general partners of JFC and the power to adjust the proportion of their respective interests in JFC. As of December 31, 2019,2022, JFC was composed of 41723,087 individual partners, many of whom hold more than one type of partnership interest. Of those individuals, as of December 31, 2022, 517 were general partners and 24,34122,938 were limited partners, 2,4573,026 of whom are also service partners, as well as 494and 606 were subordinated limited partners. Effective January 1, 2019, the Partnership

4


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

Agreement authorized a new class of partner, known as a service partner. Each service partner must also be a financial advisor and a general partner or a limited partner. Service partners are financial advisors but not employees of the Partnership and do not hold capital interests in addition to their general, partnershiplimited or subordinated limited partnership interests. As of February 28, 2020,24, 2023, JFC was composed of 47334,233 individual partners, of which 602 were general partners and 24,27334,075 were limited partners, 2,8455,060 of whom arewere also service partners, as well as 530and 668 were subordinated limited partners. The partner counts include all new partners admitted to each partnership class after year end.end, including new limited partners from the Partnership's 2021 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2021 Plan"). See Part III, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance for a description of the governance structure of the Partnership.

Revenues by Source. The following table sets forth the sources of the Partnership’s revenues for the past three years. Due to the interdependence of the activities and departments of the Partnership’s business and the inherently subjective assumptions required to allocate overhead, it is impractical to identify and specify expenses applicable to each aspect of the Partnership’s operations. Further information on revenue related to the Partnership’s segments is provided in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

($ millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Fee revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based fees

 

$

6,778

 

 

 

71

%

 

$

6,075

 

 

 

71

%

 

$

5,047

 

 

 

66

%

 

$

9,808

 

 

 

79

%

 

$

9,737

 

 

 

79

%

 

$

7,515

 

 

 

74

%

Account and activity fees

 

 

674

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

678

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

678

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

692

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

687

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

660

 

 

 

6

%

Total fee revenue

 

 

7,452

 

 

 

78

%

 

 

6,753

 

 

 

79

%

 

 

5,725

 

 

 

75

%

 

 

10,500

 

 

 

85

%

 

 

10,424

 

 

 

84

%

 

 

8,175

 

 

 

80

%

Trade revenue

 

 

1,581

 

 

 

17

%

 

 

1,462

 

 

 

17

%

 

 

1,547

 

 

 

20

%

 

 

1,484

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

1,719

 

 

 

14

%

 

 

1,719

 

 

 

17

%

Interest and dividends

 

 

416

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

362

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

265

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

514

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

167

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

207

 

 

 

2

%

Other revenue

 

 

77

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

17

 

 

<1

%

 

 

60

 

 

 

1

%

Other (loss) revenue, net

 

 

(87

)

 

 

-1

%

 

 

63

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

64

 

 

 

1

%

Total revenue

 

$

9,526

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

8,594

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

7,597

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

12,411

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

12,373

 

 

 

100

%

 

$

10,165

 

 

 

100

%

Asset-based Fees

Asset-based fee revenue is derived from fees determined by the underlying value of client assets and includes advisory programs fees, service fees, and other asset-based fees.

Advisory Program Fees. The Partnership earns program fees from investment advisory services offered in the U.S. through the Edward Jones Advisory Solutions® program (“Advisory Solutions”) and the Edward Jones Guided Solutions® program ("Guided Solutions") and in Canada through the Edward Jones Portfolio Program® (“Portfolio Program”) and the Edward Jones Guided Portfolios® program (“Guided Portfolios”). Advisory Solutions and Guided Solutions are both investment advisory programs created under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). Portfolio Program and Guided Portfolios are not subject to the Advisers Act as services from these programs are only offered in Canada. Program fees are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program, as well as contractual rates. These fees are impacted by changes in market values of the assets and client dollars invested in and divested from the accounts.

5


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

Through Advisory Solutions, financial advisors provide investment advisory services to clients for an annual fee based upon the average daily market value of their assets in the program. Clients can choose to invest in Advisory Solutions Fund Models, which invest in affiliated mutual funds, unaffiliated mutual funds, and exchange-traded funds ("ETFs") or Advisory Solutions Unified Managed Account Models, which also includes separately managed allocations. When investing in Advisory Solutions, the client may elect either a research or a custom model. If the client elects a research model, the Partnership assumes full investment discretion on the account and the client assets will be invested in one of numerous different research models developed and managed by Edward Jones. If the client elects to build a custom model, the Partnership assumes limited investment discretion on the account, and the investments are selected by the client and his or hertheir financial advisor. The vast majority of client assets within Advisory Solutions are invested in research models.

The Partnership formed the Bridge Builder® Trust (the "BB Trust") to accommodate the size and expected growth in investment advisory services offered through Advisory Solutions, to reduce the concentration of client investments in third partythird-party funds and to lower client investment management expenses. The BB Trust has eighteleven active sub-advised mutual funds in its series currently available for Advisory Solutions clients. The BB Trust filed a preliminary registration statement for a new fund with the SEC on December 14, 2022, and may add additional funds in the future, at its discretion. Olive Street Investment Advisers, LLC ("Olive Street"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of JFC, is the investment adviser to the eighteleven sub-advised mutual funds of the BB Trust and has primary responsibility for setting the overall investment strategies and for selecting and managing sub-advisers, subject to the review and approval of the BB Trust's Board of Trustees. The BB Trust pays Olive Street for performing investment advisory services and Olive Street pays fees to the sub-advisers of the funds in the BB Trust. Olive Street has contractually agreed to waive any investment advisory fees which exceed the investment advisory fees paid to sub-advisers, resulting in no impact on the Partnership's net income.

5


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

Guided Solutions is a client-directed advisory program where financial advisors work with clients to build a portfolio that is aligned with the Partnership's investment philosophy and guidance. Clients retain control over investment decisions and financial advisors help guide clients through a required process of identifying their financial goals and selecting an appropriate portfolio objective. Guided Solutions offers two options, a Fund account or Flex account, which provide different investment options depending on a client's account size. The Partnership earns an annual fee based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program. The sub-advised mutual funds of the BB Trust are not currently eligible investments in Guided Solutions.

Through the Portfolio Program, Canadian financial advisors provide discretionary investment advisory services to clients by using independent investment managers and proprietary asset allocation models. Guided Portfolios is a non-discretionary, fee-based program with structured investment guidelines available to Canadian Investors.investors. Fees for these programs are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program as well as the portfolio model selected.

Service Fees. The Partnership also earns revenue on clients’ assets through service fees and other revenues received under agreements with mutual fund and insurance companies. The fees generally range from 15 to 25 basis points (0.15% to 0.25%) but can be up to 100 basis points (1.00%) of the value of the client assets.

Other Asset-Based Fees. The Partnership earns cash solutions revenue from the Edward Jones Insured Bank Deposit Program (the "IBD Program"), which is an interest-bearing savings solution for clients that offers Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage. Edward Jones has agreements with FDIC-insured third-party banks to transfer available cash balances in participating clients' accounts to interest-bearing deposit accounts at those banks. The Partnership, as agent, earns net revenue from fees derived from the average daily deposit balance in the IBD Program.

Investment management fees were earned by Passport Research, Ltd. ("Passport Research"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Edward Jones, as the investment adviser to the Edward Jones Money Market Fund (the "Money Market Fund") through November 1, 2022. Effective November 2, 2022, the Money Market Fund's Board of Trustees approved the transfer of its investment advisory services from Passport Research to Olive Street. The Partnership is currently in the process of dissolving Passport Research. Edward Jones also earns certain asset-based fees from the Money Market Fund, some or all of which may be voluntarily waived.

The Partnership earns revenue sharing from certain mutual fund and insurance companies. In most cases, this is additional compensation paid by investment advisers, insurance companies or distributors based on a percentage of average assets held by the Partnership’s clients.

6


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

In addition to the advisory programs mentioned above, the Partnership earns asset-based fees from the trust services and investment management services offered to its clients through Edward Jones Trust Company (“Trust Co.”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of JFC.

Asset-based fee revenue also includes investment management fees earned by Passport Research, Ltd. ("Passport Research"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of JFC, as the investment adviser to the Edward Jones Money Market Fund.    

Account and Activity Fees

Account and activity fees include shareholder accounting service fees, insurance contract service fees, Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) custodial service fees, and other product/service fees. Account and activity fees are impacted by the number of client accounts and the types of services provided to those accounts, among other factors.

The Partnership charges fees to certain mutual fund companies for shareholder accounting services, including maintaining client account information and providing other administrative services for the mutual funds. Insurance contract service fees are fees charged to certain insurance companies for administrative support. The Partnership acts as the custodian for clients’ IRAs and the clients are charged an annual fee for this and other account services. Account and activity fees also include sales-based revenue sharing fees and various transaction fees.

Edward Jones also earns certain account and activity fees from the Money Market Fund, some or all of which may be voluntarily waived.

Trade Revenue

Trade revenue is composed of commissions and principal transactions revenue. Commissions are earned from the distribution of mutual fund shares and insurance products and the purchase or sale of mutual fund shares, equitiessecurities. Principal transactions revenue primarily results from the Partnership's distribution of and insurance products, as well asparticipation in principal transactions.trading activities in municipal obligations, certificates of deposit and corporate obligations. Trade revenue is impacted by the number of financial advisors, trading volume (client dollars invested), mix of the products in which clients invest and the size of trades, all of which may be impacted by market volatility, and margins earned on the transactions, and market volatility.  transactions.

Commissions. As a distributor of mutual fund shares, the Partnership receives a selling concession which generally ranges from 1% to 5% of the purchase price, of the shares, depending on the terms of each fund’sfund's prospectus, andincluding varying rates based on the amountclient's assets under care ("AUC") within a fund family, inclusive of the purchase.purchase price. The Partnership also receives a commission when it acts as an agent for a client in the purchase or sale of securities. The commission is based on the value of the securities purchased or sold. In addition, the Partnership sells life insurance, long-term care insurance, disability insurance, fixed and variable annuities, and other types of insurance products of unaffiliated insurance companies to its clients through its financial advisors who hold insurance sales licenses. As an agent for the insurance companies, the Partnership receives commissions on the premiums paid for the products.

6


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

Principal Transactions. Revenue is primarily earned from the Partnership's distribution of and participation in principal trading activities in municipal obligations, over-the-counter corporate obligations and certificates of deposit. The Partnership’s principal trading activities are conducted with other dealers where the Partnership acts as a dealer buying from and selling to its clients. In principal trading of securities, the Partnership exposes its capital to the risk of fluctuation in the fair value of its security positions. The Partnership maintains securities positions in inventory solely to support its business of buying securities from and selling securities to its retail clients and does not seek to profit by engaging in proprietary trading for its own account. The related unrealized gains and losses for these securities are recorded within trade revenue. Also included within principal transactions revenue is revenue derived from the Partnership's distribution of unit investment trusts and participation as a syndicate member in underwriting activities.

Interest and Dividends

Interest and dividends revenue is earned on client margin (loan)loan account balances, cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Partnership loans and investment securities and inventory securities.  Loans secured by securities held in client margin accounts provide a source of income to the Partnership.  The Partnership is permitted to use securities owned by margin clients having an aggregate market value of generally up to 140% of the debit balance in margin accounts as collateral for the borrowings.  The Partnership may also use funds provided by free credit balances in client accounts to finance client margin account borrowings.

The Partnership’s interest income is impacted by the level of client margin account balances, cashbalance size and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Partnership loans, investment securities and inventory securities and the interest rates earned on each.

7


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

Other Revenue (Loss), Net

Other revenue (loss), net, primarily consists of unrealized gains and losses associated with changes in the fair market value of the Partnership's investment securities held to generate income and to assist in the management of firm liquidity, as well as securities held to economically hedge future liabilities for its non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Unrealized gains and losses are impacted by changes in market levels and the interest rate environment.

Significant Revenue Source

As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership distributed mutual funds for approximately 100132 mutual fund companies. One company, American Funds Distributors, Inc. and its affiliates, represented 14%11% of the Partnership’s total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.2022. The revenue generated from this company primarily relates to business conducted with the Partnership’s U.S. segment.

BUSINESS OPERATIONS

Branch Development. The Partnership's Branch Development division is responsible for selecting and enabling branch teams, which typically consist of a financial advisor and BOA, whose goal is to start, build and optimize the client experience. Branch Development supports the Partnership by attracting and hiring high-quality talent, onboarding and developing branch teams, developing leaders and associates in both the home office and in the field, and optimizing and supporting branch team performance.

Client Strategies Group. The Partnership's Client Strategies Group focuses on ensuring clients are on track to achieve their financial goals through collaboration of marketing, advice and guidance, trading, and products and solutions support. Marketing's role is to understand clients and investors to appropriately define and deliver the Partnership's brand, investment strategy and experience. The Advice and Guidance department provides branch teams with perspective and recommendations that align with the firm's investment philosophy and address our clients' needs. The department does not offer its research for sale and supplements its own research with independent third-party research services.  The Trading department executes client orders for product transactions.  Product specialists lead the Partnership's product strategy and management to provide branch teams and clients with a broad supply of quality products aligned with advice and guidance, and solutions enables branch teams to successfully deliver tailored advice to meet client needs.

Client Account Administration, Operations and Service. The Partnership has anPartnership's Operations division that is responsible for activities relating to client onboarding, asset movement, trading, custody and client reporting. The division also facilitates activities relating to client securities and the processing of transactions with other broker-dealers, exchanges and clearing organizations. These activities include receipt, identification and delivery of funds and securities, internal financial controls, accounting functions and office services, custody of client securities and handling of margin accounts.services.

7


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

The volume of transactions the Partnership processes fluctuates considerably. The Partnership records such transactions and posts its books and records on a daily basis. The Partnership has a computerizedan electronic branch office communication system which is principally utilized for entry of security orders, quotations, messagescommunication between offices, research of various client account information, and cash and security receipts functions. Home office personnel, including those in the Operations and Compliance divisions, monitor day-to-day operations to determine compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Failure to keep current and accurate books and records can render the Partnership liable to disciplinary action by governmental and self-regulatory organizations (“SROs”).

The Partnership clears and settles virtually all of its equity, municipal bond, corporate bond, mutual fund and annuity transactions for its U.S. broker-dealer through the National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”), Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) and Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), which are all subsidiaries of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation located in New York, New York.

In conjunction with clearing and settling transactions with NSCC, the Partnership holds client securities on deposit with DTC in lieu of maintaining physical custody of the certificates. The Partnership uses a major bank for custody and settlement of U.S. treasury securities and Government National Mortgage Association, Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation issues. The Partnership also uses a major bank for custody and settlement of foreign securities.securities transactions. Mutual funds do not have physical certificates and are custodied with the individual mutual fund companies.

The Partnership'sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary handles the routing and settlement of client transactions. In addition, the Partnership'sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is a member of the Canadian Depository of Securities (“CDS”) and FundServFundserv for clearing and settlement of transactions. CDS effectsmanages the clearing and settlement of trades in both domestic and cross-border depository-eligible securities onthrough the Canadian National Stock Exchange, Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”)automated CDSX clearing and TSX Venture Exchange (“CDNX”).settlement system. Client securities on deposit are also held with CDS and National Bank Correspondent Network.Financial Inc., through its National Bank Independent Network division.

The Partnership is substantially dependent upon the operational capacity and ability of NSCC, DTC, FICC, and CDS.  Any serious delays in the processing of securities transactions encountered by these clearing and depository companies may result in delays of delivery of cash or securities to the Partnership’s clients.

8


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), along with its U.S. business, Securities Processing Solutions, U.S., and its international business, Securities Processing Solutions, International, provide automated data processing services for client account activity and related records for the Partnership in the U.S. and Canada, respectively. The Partnership also utilizes certain products and services of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”) for mutual fund investments held by the Partnership’s clients and for certain trading activities. The Partnership has arrangements with other brokers to execute certain equity and fixed income orders. For orders in Canada, the Partnership transacts directly on the exchanges in an agency capacity.

The Partnership'sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary has an agreement with Computershare Trust Company of Canada to act as trustee for clients' registered retirement accounts, including holding cash balances within retirement accounts. TheEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is the custodian for client securities and manages all related securities and cash processing, such as trades, dividends, corporate actions, client cash receipts and disbursements, client tax reporting for certain holdings and statements.

The Partnership's Service division leads the delivery of service support from the home office to assist branch team and client success.

Wealth Management Advice and Solutions. The Partnership's Wealth Management Advice and Solutions division focuses on helping clients achieve their financial goals through advice, products, planning and services. The division's role is to understand the needs of clients and investors, provide perspective and recommendations that align with the firm's investment philosophy and offer a broad range of quality products, solutions and tools that enable branch team's successteams to successfully deliver tailored advice to meet client needs.


Competition.
The Partnership is subject to intense competition in all phases of its business from broker-dealers, registered investment advisors, banks, insurance companies and enhanceother financial services firms, some of which are larger than the client experience.Partnership in terms of capital, resources, AUC, transaction volume and range of financial services. The financial services industry continues to evolve technologically, with an increasing number of firms of all sizes providing lower cost, computer-based "robo-advice" with limited or no personalized service to clients or to supplement full-service offerings. The Partnership also competes with firms of all sizes offering discount services, usually with lower levels of personalized service to individual clients, including major competitor brokerage firms that offer zero commissions for purchases and sales of stocks, ETFs and other brokerage products. Clients can transfer their business to competing organizations at any time. The Partnership also faces competition from "fintech" companies that have technological advancements that allow them to compete through internet- and mobile-based platforms. There is also intense competition among firms to attract and retain qualified professionals, including financial advisors, BTSMs, and home office associates. The Partnership experiences continued efforts by competing firms to hire away its financial advisors, although the Partnership believes its rate of attrition of financial advisors is in line with comparable firms.

Human Capital

Employees.The Partnership’s purpose is to partner for positive impact to improve the lives of its clients and colleagues and together, better its communities and society. Helping associates make a positive impact in the lives of clients, colleagues and communities starts with the care and support the Partnership provides for its associates' well-being. The Partnership is committed to providing comprehensive benefits to meet the needs of its associates.

The Partnership's revenues are generated by financial advisors are employees (or partners)and BTSMs serving clients with the support of the Partnership.  As of December 31, 2019,Partnership's home office associates. To grow and promote branch team success, the Partnership had approximately 49,000 full-timehas begun offering options for greater flexibility and part-time employeesis continually investing resources into enhancing the relationship between each branch team and partners, includingeach client, which supports the Partnership's client-first mission.

Development

Delivering on the client-first business model goes hand-in-hand with investing in learning and development. The Partnership is committed to helping financial advisors, BTSMs and home office associates on their career path, providing opportunities from formal training and coaching to mentoring programs, leadership opportunities and tuition reimbursement. Engagement and branch experience surveys are regularly conducted to listen to associates and branch teams to allow the Partnership to take timely actions to optimize their engagement, which helps the Partnership better serve each other and its 18,704clients.

9


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

The Partnership maintains a comprehensive training program for financial advisors.  advisors which includes preparation for regulatory exams, online modules, concentrated instruction in a face-to-face or virtual classroom and on-the-job training in a branch office. During the first phase, U.S. and Canada trainees study for and take the requisite examinations. After passing the requisite examinations, trainees complete online modules and a comprehensive training program either virtually or in one of the Partnership’s home office training facilities, followed by on-the-job training in their respective markets in nearby branch locations. Branch training includes reviewing investments, compliance requirements and office procedures, understanding client needs, establishing a base of potential clients and serving clients. Multiple field-based leaders provide in-region mentorship, training and coaching to financial advisor trainees to assist their assimilation into the firm and the industry.

The Partnership’sPartnership's ongoing training of financial advisors and BTSMs throughout their careers serves to enable branch teams to better meet client needs and effectively manage their branch office.

Compensation

The Partnership values and respects the contributions of financial advisors, BTSMs and home office associates and recognizes individual efforts through a compensation program that promotes a long-term career, financial security and well-being. Employee compensation consists of base pay with a bonus program and retirement plan for eligible employees. Financial advisors are generally compensated on a commission basis, subject to a minimum guaranteed salary, and may be entitled to bonus compensation based on their respective branch office profitability and the profitability of the Partnership. The Partnership pays bonuses to its non-financial advisor employees pursuant to a discretionary formula established by management based on the profitability of the Partnership. Service partners are financial advisors, but not employeesThe retirement plan consists of a profit-sharing contribution tied to the Partnership.


8


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

EmployeesPartnership's profitability and partners of the Partnership in the U.S. are bonded under a blanket fidelity bond.401(k) contribution. The Partnership has an aggregate annual coverage of $50,000,000 subjectalso makes a significant investment in subsidizing health and wellness benefits to deductibles.  Employees and partners of the Partnership in Canada are bonded under a blanket policy as required by the Investment Industry Regulation Organization of Canada (“IIROC”).  The Partnership has an annual aggregate amount of coverage in Canada of C$50,000,000 with a per occurrence limit of C$25,000,000, subjectoffer full-time associates access to a deductible.benefit plan with the opportunity to earn medical plan premium discounts.

The Partnership maintains a comprehensive training program for financial advisors which includes preparation for regulatory exams, on-line modules, concentrated instruction in the classroom and on-the-job training in a branch office.  During the first phase, U.S. and Canada trainees study for and take the requisite examinations.  After passing the requisite examinations, trainees complete on-line modules and a comprehensive training program in one of the Partnership’s home office training facilities, followed by on-the-job training in their respective markets in nearby branch locations.  Branch training includes reviewing investments, compliance requirements and office procedures, understanding client needs, and establishing a base of potential clients. Multiple field-based leaders provide in-region mentorship, training and coaching to trainees to assist their assimilation into the firm and the industry. The Partnership offers periodic training to financial advisors for the entirety of their careers.  These training programs continue to focus on meeting client needs and effective management of the branch office.

The Partnership considers itsitself to have good employee relations to be good and believes that its compensation and employee benefits, which include medical, life and disability insurance plans, andother benefit plans, and flexible work arrangements, are competitivecompetitive. As part of its efforts to promote pay equity, the Partnership has implemented measures in its U.S. home offices such as routinely benchmarking roles against market comparables, increasing pay transparency for applicants and associates, setting pay ranges based on role and experience, applying consistent processes for annual merit increases and bonuses and driving additional ongoing and future improvements.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion ("DEI")

Inclusive behavior and inclusive leadership are integrated into the Partnership's core values. Leaders are responsible for hiring and developing their teams, with those offered by other firms principally engagedthe Partnership supplying guidance on assembling diverse candidate slates and information about area-specific hiring and retention opportunities. Certain financial advisors also take on inclusion leader roles in their geographic areas and develop a tailored plan which supports the securities business.

Competition.growth, performance, engagement and leadership development of women and diverse financial advisors within their specific markets. The Partnership is subjectalso has an advisory group of diverse financial advisors, BTSMs and home office associates who offer perspective and input to intense competition in all phases of its business from other securities firms, some of which are larger than the Partnership in terms of capital, brokerage volume and underwriting activities.help advance certain DEI efforts. In addition, the Partnership encounters competition from other organizations suchhas Business Resource Groups ("BRGs") who volunteer to support inclusion and diversity efforts. BRG members and allies come together to discuss their unique experiences, help attract and retain talent, and discover ways to serve clients and future clients more deeply, especially as banks, insurance companies,demographics and others offering financial services and advice.needs change.

Additionally, the Partnership is continuously working to improve options to support associates seeking to voluntarily self-identify their disabilities. The Partnership also competes with firmshas dedicated a team to design accessible digital experiences for clients and colleagues.

10


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

As of all sizes offering discount brokerage services, usually with lower levelsDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, 11% and 10%, respectively, of personalized service to individual clients, including major competitors that, during 2019, announced zero commissionsthe Partnership's total employees, composed of financial advisors, BTSMs and home office associates, were self-identified people of color, and as of both periods, 62% of employees were women. The following table summarizes the Partnership's DEI goals for the salesend of stocks, ETFs2025 and other brokerage products.  Further,progress made towards those goals as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:

 

Partnership's
2025 Goals

 

Actuals as of December 31, 2022

 

Actuals as of December 31, 2021

 

Partnership Diversity (US & Canada):

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Financial Advisors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

     People of Color

 

15

%

 

9

%

 

9

%

     Women

 

30

%

 

23

%

 

22

%

   Home Office General Partners:

 

 

 

 

 

 

     People of Color

 

15

%

 

14

%

 

12

%

     Women

 

40

%

 

32

%

 

31

%

   Leaders Across Home Office:

 

 

 

 

 

 

     People of Color

 

20

%

 

19

%

 

17

%

     Women

 

50

%

 

49

%

 

49

%

Employees

The Partnership has continued executing its strategy to grow and promote branch team success during 2022, ending the year with 18,796 financial advisors in two thirds of U.S. counties and all Canadian provinces, a slight decrease from 2021. In 2022, the financial services industry continues to evolve technologically, with an increasing numberadvisor attrition rate was 5.8%, a decrease from 6.6% in 2021.

As of firms of all sizes providing lower cost, computer-based "robo-advice" with limited or no personalized service to clients or to supplement full-service offerings.  Clients are able to transfer their business to competing organizations at any time.  There is also intense competition among firms forDecember 31, 2022, the Partnership had approximately 52,000 full-time and part-time employees and partners, including its financial advisors. The Partnership experiences continued efforts by competing firms to hire away itsPartnership’s financial advisors althoughare employees or partners of the Partnership believes its rate of attrition ofPartnership. Service partners are financial advisors, is in line with comparable firms.but not employees of the Partnership.

REGULATION

Refer to Part II, Item 7 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more information about key metrics and historical growth and attrition rates for financial advisors.

REGULATION

Broker-Dealer and Investment Adviser Regulation. The securities industry is subject to extensive federal and state laws, rules and regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including sales methods, trade practices among broker-dealers, use and safekeeping of client funds and securities, client payment and margin requirements, capital structure of securities firms, record-keeping, standards of care, and the conduct of directors, officers and employees.

The SEC is the U.S. agency responsible for the administration of the federal securities laws. Its mission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly and efficient markets and facilitate capital formation. Edward Jones is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC. Edward Jones is subject to periodic examinations by the SEC, review by a designated examining authority and certain periodic and ad hoc reporting requirements of securities and customer funds. Much of the regulation of broker-dealers has been delegated by the SEC to SROs, principally the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"). FINRA adopts rules (which are subject to approval by the SEC) that govern the broker-dealer industry and conducts periodic examinations of Edward Jones’ operations.

Securities firms are also subject to regulation by securities and insurance regulators in each U.S. state (as well as the District of Columbia) and U.S. territory where they conduct business. Since Edward Jones is registered as a broker-dealer and sells insurance products in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, Edward Jones is subject to regulation in each of these jurisdictions.

9

11


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

The SEC, SROs, state authorities and other regulators may conduct administrative proceedings which can result in censure, fine, suspension or expulsion of a securities firm, its officers or employees. Edward Jones has in the past been, and may in the future be, the subject of regulatory actions by various agencies that have the authority to regulate its activities (see Part I, Item 3 – Legal Proceedings for more information).

As an investment dealer registered in all provinces and territories of Canada, the Partnership'sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is subject to provincial, territorial and federal laws. All provinces and territorial jurisdictions have established securities administrators to administer securities laws. The Partnership'sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is also subject to the regulation of the New Self-Regulatory Organization of Canada SRO, IIROC,("New SRO"), which oversees the business conduct and financial affairs of its member firms, as well as all trading activity on debt and equity marketplaces in Canada. IIROCThroughout 2022, EJ Canada was regulated by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ("IIROC"), which was amalgamated into the New SRO and its rules were replaced by New SRO’s rules effective January 1, 2023. New SRO fulfills its regulatory obligations by implementing and enforcing rules regarding the proficiency, business and financial conduct of member firms and their registered employees, and marketplace integrity rules regarding trading activity on Canada debt and equity marketplaces.

In addition, Edward Jones and Olive Street and Passport Research are subject to the rules and regulations promulgated under the Advisers Act, which requires certain investment advisers to register with the SEC. Edward Jones and Olive Street and Passport Research are registered investment advisers with the SEC. Passport Research was a registered investment adviser with the SEC prior to its withdrawal on December 15, 2022. The rules and regulations promulgated under the Advisers Act govern all aspects of the investment advisory business, including registration, trading practices, custody of client funds and securities, record-keeping, advertising and business conduct. Edward Jones and Olive Street and Passport Research are subject to periodic examinations by the SEC, which is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act.

Pursuant to U.S. federal law, Edward Jones as a broker-dealer belongs to the Securities Investors Protection Corporation (“SIPC”). For clients in the U.S., SIPC provides $500,000 of coverage for missing cash and securities in a client's account, with a maximum of $250,000 for cash claims. Pursuant to IIROCNew SRO requirements, the Partnership'sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary belongs to the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (“CIPF”), a non-profit organization that provides investor protection for investment dealer insolvency. For clients in Canada, CIPF limits coverage to C$1,000,000 in total, which can be any combination of securities and cash.

The Partnership currently maintains additional protection for U.S. clients through a contract with Underwriters at Lloyd’s, which protects clients’ accounts in excess of the SIPC coverage subject to specified limits. This policy covers theft, misplacement, destruction, burglary, embezzlement or abstraction of cash and client securities up to an aggregate limit of $900,000,000 (with maximum cash coverage limited to $1,900,000 per client) for covered claims of all U.S. clients of Edward Jones. Market losses are not covered by SIPC or the additional protection. In addition, the Partnership has cash and investments segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit for U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 (“Customer Protection Rule”) ofunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act").

Employees and partners of the Partnership in the U.S. are bonded under a blanket fidelity bond. The Partnership has an aggregate annual coverage of $50,000,000 subject to deductibles. Employees and partners of the Partnership in Canada are bonded under a blanket policy as required by New SRO. The Partnership has an annual aggregate amount of coverage in Canada of C$50,000,000 with a per occurrence limit of C$25,000,000, subject to a deductible.

Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), the Department of Labor ("DOL") has rulemaking authority over retirement savings, which includes retirement accounts and retirement plans, and regulatory authority over retirement plans.

Additional legislation, changes in rules promulgated by the SEC, the DOL, SROs, state authorities and other regulators, and/or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules, may directly affect the operations and profitability of broker-dealers and investment advisers. See Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors – Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives for additional information.

12


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

Regulation of Trust Co. and Regulation of JFC as Trust Co.’s Parent. Trust Co. is a federally chartered savings and loan association that operates under a limited purpose “trust-only” charter, which generally restricts Trust Co. to acting solely in a custodial or fiduciary capacity, including as a trustee. Trust Co. is subject to supervision and regulation by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”).

Uniform Net Capital Rule. As a result of its activities as a U.S. broker-dealer and a member firm of FINRA, Edward Jones is subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 (“Uniform Net Capital Rule”) of the Exchange Act which is designed to measure the general financial integrity and liquidity of a broker-dealer and the minimum net capital deemed necessary to meet the broker-dealer’s continuing commitments to its clients. The Uniform Net Capital Rule provides for two methods of computing net capital. Edward Jones has adopted what is generally referred to as the alternative method. Minimum required net capital under the alternative method is equal to the greater of $250,000 or 2% of the aggregate

10


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

debit items, as defined under the Customer Protection Rule. The Uniform Net Capital Rule prohibits withdrawal of equity capital whether by payment of dividends, repurchase of stock or other means, if net capital would thereafter be less than minimum requirements. Additionally, certain withdrawals require the approval of the SEC and FINRA to the extent they exceed defined levels even though such withdrawals would not cause net capital to be less than 5% of aggregate debit items. In computing net capital, various adjustments are made to exclude assets which are not readily convertible into cash and to provide a conservative valuation of other assets, such as securities owned. Failure to maintain the required net capital may subject Edward Jones to suspension or expulsion by FINRA, the SEC and other regulatory bodies and/or exchanges and may ultimately require liquidation. Edward Jones has, at all times, been in compliance with the Uniform Net Capital Rule.

The Partnership'sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary and Trust Co. are also required to maintain specified levels of regulatory capital. Each of these subsidiaries has, at all times, been in compliance with the applicable capital requirements in the jurisdictions in which it operates.

Customer Protection Rule. As a result of its activities as a broker-dealer and a member firm of FINRA, Edward Jones is subject to the Customer Protection Rule which is designed to ensure that customer securities and funds in a broker-dealer's custody are adequately safeguarded. The Customer Protection Rule requires broker-dealers to promptly obtain and maintain physical possession or control of all fully paid and excess margin securities and to segregate all customer cash or money obtained from the use of customer property that has not been used to finance transactions of other customers. Combined, these requirements substantially limit a broker-dealer's ability to use customer securities and restrict a broker-dealer to only use customer cash or margin securities for activities directly related to financing customer securities purchases. Edward Jones has, at all times, been in compliance with the Customer Protection Rule.

SEC Rules and Guidance on the Standards of Conduct for Investment Professionals(the "Rules and Guidance") and Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA") Regulations. As a U.S. broker-dealer, Edward Jones is subject to Regulation Best Interest, which establishes a standard of care for broker-dealers that includes acting in the best interest of their brokerage clients when making a recommendation and addressing conflicts of interest. Edward Jones is also subject to the SEC rule requiring registered investment advisers and broker-dealers to deliver a Form CRS Relationship Summary to their clients informing them of the types of client relationships offered, together with the applicable standards of care, and information on fees, costs, conflicts of interest, and legal and disciplinary history. The SEC has also issued guidance clarifying the "fiduciary" standard of care applicable to investment advisers and advisory clients and guidance clarifying what broker-dealer activities are excluded from the definition of "investment adviser." Edward Jones has, at all times, maintained policies and procedures to comply with the Rules and Guidance.

As a Canadian broker-dealer, EJ Canada is subject to the regulations of the CSA, many of which are similar to the SEC's Rules and Guidance.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

The Partnership files annual, quarterly, and current reports and other information with the SEC. The Partnership’s SEC filings are available to the public on the SEC’s website at www.sec.govand on our website at www.edwardjones.com.

13


PART I

Item 1. Business, continued

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in particular Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of U.S. securities laws. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “will,” “should,” and other expressions which predict or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters. You should not rely on forward-looking statements, because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the control of the Partnership. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Partnership to be materially different from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Some of the factors that might cause differences between forward-looking statements and actual events include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) general economic conditions, including inflation, an economic downturn, a recession or volatility in the U.S. and/or global securities markets, and actions of the U.S. Federal Reserve and/or central banks outside of the United States;States and economic effects of international geopolitical conflicts, widespread health epidemics or pandemics or other major world events; (2) actions of competitors; (3) the Partnership's ability to attract and retain qualified financial advisors and other employees; (4) changes in interest rates; (5) regulatory actions; (3)(6) changes in legislation or regulation; (4) actions of competitors; (5)(7) litigation; (6)(8) the ability of clients, other broker-dealers, banks, depositories and clearing organizations to fulfill contractual obligations; (7) changes in interest rates; (8)(9) changes in technology and other technology-related risks; (9)(10) a fluctuation or decline in the fair value of securities; (10) our ability to attract and retain qualified financial advisors and other employees; and (11) the risks discussed under Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors. These forward-looking statements were based on information, plans, and estimates at the date of this report, and the Partnership does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, future events or other changes.

1114


PART I

ITEM 1A. RISKRISK FACTORS

The Partnership is subject to a number of risks potentially impacting its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or in the Partnership’s other filings with the SEC, the following are some important factors that could cause the Partnership’s actual results to differ materially from results experienced in the past or those projected in any forward-looking statement. If any of the matters included in the following risks were to occur, the Partnership’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones the Partnership faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Partnership or that the Partnership currently deems immaterial could also have a material adverse impact on the Partnership’s business and operations. All amounts are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

RISKRISKS RELATED TO THE PARTNERSHIP’S BUSINESS

Risks Related to Economic and Market Conditions and Events

MARKET CONDITIONS AND INFLATION SECURITIES INDUSTRYAs a part ofThe Partnership's financial results are directly impacted by market conditions, inflation, recessionary conditions and trends and changes in the securities industry,industry. A continued downturn or a downturnrecession in the U.S. and/or global securities markets historically has, and in the future could have a significant negative effect on revenues andthat could significantlyfurther reduce or eliminate profitability of the Partnership. In addition, an increase inIncreasing or prolonged inflation could also affect securities prices and as a result, the profitability of the Partnership. Furthermore, the securities industry is continually facing change, some of which may negatively impact the profitability of the Partnership.

General political and economic conditions and events such as U.S. fiscal and monetary policy, economic recession, governmental shutdown, trade tensions and disputes, global economic slowdown, widespread health epidemics or pandemics, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, war or other geopolitical conflict, changes in local and national economic, social and political conditions, regulatory changes or changes in the law, or interest rate or currency rate fluctuations could create a downturn in the U.S. and/or global securities markets. The securities industry, and therefore the Partnership, is highly dependent upon market prices and volumes which are highly unpredictable and volatile in nature. Events such as global recession, frozen credit markets, and institutional failures and emergence of geopolitical conflicts could make the capital markets increasingly volatile. Weakened global economic conditions and unsettled financial markets, among other things, could cause significant declines in the Partnership’s net revenues which would adversely impact its overall financial results.

Recently, the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) has adversely affected global business activities and has resulted in significant uncertainty in the global economy and volatility in financial markets. The impact of the coronavirus continues to evolve and has been marked by rapid changes and developments. Accordingly, the Partnership cannot reliably predict the ultimate impact on financial markets and the Partnership’s business operations and financial results.

The Partnership’s composition of net revenue is heavily weighted towards asset-based fee revenue, and a decrease in the market value of assets wouldhas and could continue to have a negative impact on the Partnership’s financial results due to the fact that asset-based fees are earned on the market value of the underlying client assets. A market decline could have a greater negative impact on revenues and profitability than experienced in prior years due to the increasing proportion of asset-based revenues. Market volatility could also cause clients to continue to move their investments to lower margin products, or withdraw them, which could have an adverse impact on the profitability of the Partnership. The Partnership could also experience a material reduction in volume and lower securities prices in times of market volatility, which would result in lower trade and asset-based fee revenue, decreased margins and losses in firm inventory accounts. Current and potential market changes to fee structures in the mutual funds industry have resulted in and may continue to result in decreased margins and therefore lower revenues.investment accounts. In the event of a significant reduction in revenues, and depending on the amount of fixed financial advisor compensation at that time, the Partnership could experience a material adverse impact on the profitability of the Partnership.

Furthermore, ifHigh inflation rates and market expectations of rising or prolonged inflation in the market werefuture can negatively influence securities prices, as well as activity levels in the securities markets. As a result, the Partnership’s profitability has and may continue to be adversely affected by inflation and inflationary expectations. Additionally, the impact of inflation on the Partnership’s operating expenses may affect profitability to the extent that additional costs are not recovered through attracting new clients, gathering new assets or raising prices of services offered by the Partnership to increase revenue.

A significant portion of the Partnership’s clients’ holdings are in mutual fund investments, which have been and may continue to be impacted by changes in the mutual funds industry affecting fee structures. The Partnership has experienced and may continue to experience a sudden or sustained downturn or the economy were to enter into a recession, the Partnership would be subject to increased risk of its clients being unable to meet their commitments, such as margin obligations. This could result in lower revenues and declining profit margins.decreased margins earned on mutual funds, which negatively impacts trade revenue.


12

15


PART I

Item 1.1A. Risk Factors, continued

Inflation and future expectations of inflation can negatively influence securities prices, as well as activity levels in the securities markets. As a result, the Partnership’s profitability may be adversely affected by inflation and inflationary expectations. Additionally, the impact of inflation on the Partnership’s operating expenses may affect profitability to the extent that additional costs are not recoverable through increased prices of services offered by the Partnership.

COMPETITION — The Partnership is subject to intense competition for clients and personnel, and there is an increasing pace of industry change. Some of its competitors have greater resources and are rapidly changing their business practices.

All aspects of the Partnership’s business are highly competitive. The Partnership competes for clients and personnel directly with other securities firms and increasingly with other types of organizations and other businesses offering financial services, such as banks and insurance companies. Some of these organizations have greater capital and additional resources, and some entities offer a wider range of financial services. Over the past several years, there has been significant consolidation of firms in the financial services industry, forcing the Partnership to compete with larger firms with greater capital and resources, brokerage volume and underwriting activities, and more competitive pricing. The Partnership continues to compete with firms of all sizes offering discount brokerage services, usually with lower levels of personalized service to individual clients, including major competitors that, during 2019, announced zero commissions for the sales of stocks, ETFs and other brokerage products. Further, the financial services industry continues to evolve technologically, with an increasing number of firms of all sizes providing lower cost, computer-based "robo-advice" and enhanced digital experiences for clients with limited or no personalized service to clients or to supplement full-service offerings. Industry and technology changes may result in increased prevalence of robo-advisors. The Partnership is subject to risk from the accelerated changes to the industry and competitive forces, which have resulted and are expected to continue to result in significant costs for investments in financial advisors and other human capital, technology infrastructure, digital initiatives, virtual enablement tools, strategic initiatives in anticipationrelationships and test and learn pilot programs, to support long-term growth objectives and deliver enhanced value and impact for millions of such changes.current and potential clients, as well as the Partnership's colleagues and communities. Clients are able tocan transfer their business to competing organizations at any time. The Partnership's continued ability to compete based on a business model designed to serve clients through personalized relationships with financial advisors and branch teams in order to provide goals-based advice may be impacted by the evolving financial services industry, including changing client expectations and technology needs, as well as robo-advisors and other lower cost options. The Partnership is also subject to competition from "fintech" companies that have technological advancements that allow them to compete through internet- and mobile-based platforms. The Partnership may be subject to operational risk if the Partnership is unable to keep pace with this rapidly changing environment, which includes client, industry, technology and regulatory changes. In addition, the Partnership's ability to compete and adapt its business model may be impacted by changing client demographics, preferences and values. If financial advisors dothe Partnership does not meet client needs, the Partnership could lose clients, thereby reducing revenues and profitability. Further, the Partnership faces increased competition for clients from larger firms in its non-urban markets, and from a broad range of firms in the urban and suburban markets in which the Partnership competes.

Competition among financial services firms also exists for new and experienced financial advisors, BTSMs and other personnel.home office associates. The Partnership’s continued ability to expand its business and to compete effectively depends on the Partnership’s ability to attract qualified employees and to retain and motivate current employees. The Partnership continues to make significant investments in financial advisors and other human capital, focusing on growing the number of financial advisors and preparing branch teams to deliver enhanced experiences for clients, including investing in colleague training and acumen building; delivering more value to clients and branch teams with enhanced tools and modernized technology; and supporting clients to help them stay focused and on track toward their goals during turbulent markets. If the Partnership is unable to grow and retain talent and strengthen its colleague experience and capabilities, the Partnership's number of client accounts and net new assets could have an adverse impact on its results of operations. Additionally, the Partnership's business is dependent on financial advisors' ability to compete for clients in order to attract and retain clients and clients' assets. If the Partnership’s profitability decreases, then bonuses paid to financial advisors, BTSMs and other personnel,home office associates, along with profit-sharing contributions, may be decreased or eliminated, increasing the risk that personnel could be hired away by competitors. DuringFurthermore, during an extended downturn in the economy, there is increased risk the Partnership’s more successful financial advisors may leave because a significant portion of their compensation is variable based on the Partnership’s profitability. In addition,

The Partnership competes for clients and personnel directly with other broker-dealers, registered investment advisors, banks, insurance companies and other financial services firms. Some of these securities firms are larger than the Partnership in terms of capital, resources, AUC, transaction volume and range of financial services. The Partnership continues to compete with firms of all sizes offering discount services, usually with lower levels of personalized service to individual clients, including major competitor brokerage firms that offer zero commissions for purchases and sales of stocks, ETFs and other brokerage products. The Partnership currently charges clients a commission for the purchase and sale of similar products. Existing and future clients may seek lower cost options, which may significantly reduce the Partnership's trade revenue for the purchase and sale of brokerage products in the future.

The current U.S. federal tax laws generally create favorable tax treatment for owners of pass-through entities with taxable income. However, many of the Partnership's financial advisors are employees and do not qualify for the favorable tax treatment. Further, the tax laws limit the deductibility of certain business is dependent on financial advisors'expenses for employees. As a result, the Partnership's ability to compete for clients in order to attractrecruit and retain clients and clients' assets.financial advisors against certain competitor models could be impacted.

16


PART I

Item 1A. Risk Factors, continued

The competitive pressure the Partnership experiences could have an adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. For additional information, see Part I, Item 1 – Business – Business Operations – Competition.


INTEREST RATE ENVIRONMENT — The Partnership’s profitability is impacted by the interest rate environment.

13


PART I

Item 1. Risk Factors, continued

INDUSTRY CHANGE AND IMPACT ON FIRM REVENUESChangesThe Partnership is exposed to risk from changes in the financial services industry may significantlyinterest rates. Such changes in interest rates impact the Partnership's revenue for the saleincome from interest-earning assets, primarily receivables from clients on margin balances and distribution of brokerage products.

Many of the Partnership's competitors no longer charge commissions for the sale or exchange of certain brokerage products.  During 2019, major competitors announced zero commissions for the sales of stocks, ETFs and other brokerage products.short-term investments. The Partnership currently charges clients a commission for the purchase and sale of similar products.

In addition, many mutual fund companieschanges in interest rates may also have reduced the net asset value purchase privileges for clients, which has had and may continue to have a significantan impact on the expense related to liabilities that finance these assets, such as amounts payable to clients.

The Partnership's revenue.

With these industryrevenue earned from certain cash solutions products is impacted by changes and the competitivein interest rates, with lower interest rates negatively impacting revenue. The changing interest rate environment among financial services firms, there is a heightened risk the Partnership's trade revenue for the purchase and sale of brokerage products may be significantly reduced in the future.

REPUTATION RISK — Damage to the Partnership's reputation could negatively impact the Partnership's profitability and future growth opportunities.

Managing the Partnership's reputation is critical to attracting and retaining clients and financial advisors.  Legal or regulatory actions, unethical behavior, breakdowns in the Partnership's control environment, cybersecurity breaches, data privacy incidents, poor investment performance, or compliance or operational failures, depending on their nature, size and scope, could negatively impact the Partnership's reputation, profitability and future growth opportunities.

LIQUIDITY — The Partnership’s business in the securities industry requires that sufficient liquidity be available to maintain its business activities, and it may not always have access to sufficient funds.

Liquidity, or ready access to funds, is essential to the Partnership’s business. A tight credit market could have a negative impact on the Partnership’sPartnership's ability to negotiate contracts with new banks or renegotiate existing contracts on comparable terms with banks participating in client cash programs. Further, in low interest rate environments, including in early 2022, the Partnership has waived certain fees to maintain sufficient liquiditya positive client yield, which could happen again if interest rates were to meetdecline in the future.

A rising interest rate environment, such as the one experienced throughout most of 2022 and currently, subjects the U.S. Treasury market to decreasing prices, directly impacting the Partnership's valuation of its working capital needs. Short-termportfolio of government and long-term financing are two sources of liquidity that could be affected by a tight credit market. In a tight credit market, lendersagency obligations, which may continue to result in unrealized losses on its investments. Additionally, the respective interest rates earned and paid on the Partnership’s financial assets and liabilities may not change at the same pace, which also may reduce their lendingthe Partnership's profitability.

Risks Related to borrowers, including the Partnership. There is no assurance that financing will be available at attractive terms, or at all, in the future. A significant decrease in the Partnership’s access to funds could negatively affect its businessLegal and financial management in addition to its reputation in the industry.Regulatory Matters

Limited partners who finance all or a portion of their limited partnership interests with bank loans may be more likely to request the withdrawal of capital to repay such obligations should the Partnership experience a period of reduced earnings. Any withdrawals by limited partners are subject to the terms of the Partnership Agreement and would reduce the Partnership’s available liquidity and capital.

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the Executive Committee who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions). In limited circumstances, a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while he or she still has an outstanding Partnership loan. Loans made by the Partnership to such partners are generally for a period of one year but are expected to be renewed and bear interest at an interest rate defined in the loan documents. The Partnership has full recourse against any partner that defaults on loan obligations to the Partnership. However, there is no assurance that partners will be able to repay the interest and/or the principal amount of their Partnership loans at or prior to maturity. If partners are unable to repay the interest and/or the principal amount of their Partnership loans at or prior to maturity, the Partnership could be adversely impacted.


14


PART I

Item 1. Risk Factors, continued

LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY INITIATIVES — Proposed, potential and recently enacted federal and state legislation, rules and regulations ("Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives") could significantly impact the regulation and operation of the Partnership and its subsidiaries. In addition, Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives may significantly alter or restrict the Partnership’s historic business practices, which could negatively affect its operating results.

The Partnership is subject to extensive regulation by federal and state regulatory agencies and by SROs and other regulators. The Partnership operates in a regulatory environment that is subject to ongoing change and has seen significantly increased regulation in recent years. The Partnership may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations, by changes in federal, state or foreign tax laws and regulations, or by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and regulations. Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives may impact the manner in which the Partnership markets its products and services, manages its business and operations, and interacts with clients and regulators, any or all of which could materially impact the Partnership’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Regulatory changes or changes in the law could increase compliance costs which would adversely impact profitability.

There is a high degree of uncertainty surrounding Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives. Current Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives have resulted in an increasingly complex environment in which the Partnership conducts its business. As such, the Partnership cannot reliably predict when or if any of the proposed or potential Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will be enacted, when or if any enacted Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will be implemented, whether there will be any changes to enacted or proposed Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives or the impact that any Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will have on the Partnership.

The Partnership continues to monitor several Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives, including, but not limited to:

SEC Rules and Guidance on the StandardsStandard of Conduct for Investment Professionals (the "Rules and Guidance")Care Initiatives.On June 5, 2019, the SEC adopted Regulation Best Interest, establishing a standard of care for broker-dealers that includes acting in the best interest of their brokerage clients when making a recommendation and addressing conflicts of interest. On the same day, the SEC adopted the Form CRS Relationship Summary and accompanying rule requiring registered investment advisers and broker-dealers to deliver a brief relationship summary to their clients informing them of the types of client relationships offered, together with the applicable standards of care, and information on fees, costs, conflicts of interest, and legal and disciplinary history. Regulation Best Interest and Form CRS and its rule became effective September 10, 2019, with a compliance date of June 30, 2020. In addition also on June 5, 2019, the SEC issued guidance clarifying the "fiduciary" standard of care applicable to investment advisers and advisory clients and guidance clarifying what broker-dealer activities are excluded from the definition of "investment adviser."

Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA") Amendments.  On October 3, 2019, the CSA finalized amendments (the "Client Focused Reforms") to National Instrument 31-103, "Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations."  The Client Focused Reforms, many of which are similar to the SEC's Rules and Guidance make changes to the registrant conduct requirements applicable to the Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary.  The amendments will become effective over a two-year phased implementation, concluding December 31, 2021.

The Partnership is dedicating significant resources to interpret and address the Rules and Guidance, as well as the Client Focused Reforms, to identify any potential changes to be made by their respective compliance dates, and to assess the potential impact on the Partnership's business. The final implementation of these rules may have an adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition and results of operations.

Other Standard of Care Initiatives. In addition,(see Part 1, Item 1 – Business – Regulation), state legislators and other regulators are proposing, or have adopted, laws and rules to articulate their required standard of care, which may diverge from the SEC's Rules and Guidance. The Partnership is dedicating significant resources to interpret and address these laws and rules as well.rules. The Partnership cannot reliably predict the ultimate form or impact of such rules and laws, but their enactment and implementation may have an adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.


1517


PART I

Item 1.1A. Risk Factors, continued

LITIGATION AND REGULATORY INVESTIGATIONS AND PROCEEDINGSAs a financial services firm, the Partnership is subject to litigation involving civil plaintiffs seeking substantial damages and regulatory investigations and proceedings, which have increased over time and are expected to continue to increase.

Many aspects of the Partnership’s business involve substantial litigation and regulatory risks. The Partnership is, from time to time, subject to examinations, informal inquiries and investigations by regulatory and other governmental agencies, as well as SROs and other regulators. Such matters have in the past, and could in the future, lead to formal actions, which may negatively impact the Partnership’s business.business and result in significant expenses. In the ordinary course of business, the Partnership also is subject to arbitration claims, lawsuits and other significant litigation such as class action suits. Over time, there has been increasing litigation involving the financial services industry, including class action suits that generally seek substantial damages.

The Partnership has incurred and may continue to incur significant expenses to defend and/and settle claims. Negative outcomes in litigation or settle claimsregulatory investigations may negatively impact the Partnership's financial results due to penalties and fines, restitution to clients and personnel and injunctive or other equitable relief, which may be significant. Additionally, negative outcomes may result in reputational harm that could impact the past.Partnership's ability to attract and retain clients and personnel. In view of the inherent difficulty of reliably predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases in which claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or in actions which are at very preliminary stages, the Partnership cannot predict with certainty the eventual loss or range of loss related to such matters. Due to the uncertainty related to litigation and regulatory investigations and proceedings, the Partnership cannot determine if such matters will have a material adverse effect on its revenues, profitability, and its consolidated financial condition.

Such legal actions may be material to future operating results for a particular period or periods. See Part I, Item 3 – Legal Proceedings for more information regarding certain unresolved claims.

Risks Related to Human Capital

INABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN FINANCIAL ADVISORS OR GROW THE NUMBER OF FINANCIAL ADVISORSQUALIFIED TALENTIf the Partnership experiences attrition rates of its financial advisors that are higher than its expectations or is unable to grow the number ofattract, retain, develop and support qualified financial advisors, BTSMs and home office associates, the Partnership may not be able to maintain or increase its current number ofoperating results or grow the firm's positive impact on clients and communities.

The Partnership is making significant investments in financial advisors, or meet its planned growth ratesBTSMs and operating results.

The increase inhome office associates with a focus on strengthening our colleague experience and capabilities. However, the number of newmarket for qualified personnel is highly competitive as financial advisors in recent periods has positively impactedindustry employers are offering incentives such as guaranteed contracts, upfront payments and increased compensation, which may adversely impact the Partnership's net financial advisor growth. However, being new to the business, manyattraction and retention of these financial advisors have encountered or may encounter difficulties developing or expanding their businesses.  The Partnership has periodically experienced higher rates of attrition, particularly with respect to financial advisors who are new to the businessqualified talent and have not experienced times of market volatility. The Partnership may also experience increased financial advisor attrition duecould lead to increased competition from other financial services companies and efforts by those firms to recruit its financial advisors. However, given changes to regulatory requirements, performance standards and financial advisor compensation there can be no assurance that the attrition rates the Partnership has experienced in the past will not increase in the future.

Historically, during times of market volatility and industry change, it is more difficultcosts for the Partnership to attract qualified applicants for financial advisor positions. In addition, the Partnership relies heavily on referrals from its current financial advisors in recruiting new financial advisors. During times of market volatility and industry change, current financial advisors may be less effective in recruiting potential new financial advisors through referrals. There can be no assurance that the Partnership will be able to grow at desired rates in future periods or maintain its current number of financial advisors.decreased profitability. The Partnership's growth and retention of client accounts, as well as the gathering of new assets, are affected by retention and growth in the number of financial advisors, as well as BTSMs and home office associates who support those financial advisors. SlowerIf the Partnership is unable to grow and retain needed talent, it may be unable to effectively deliver on the work of the Partnership. Additionally, the inability to attract, retain, develop or support financial advisors, BTSMs and home office associates may result in slower growth rates in the number of financial advisors, client accounts and net new assets, which could have an adverse impact on revenue the Partnership receives from asset-based fees and commissions and on its results of operations.

INCREASED FINANCIAL ADVISOR COMPENSATION — Compensation paidDuring times of market volatility and industry change, it has and may continue to be, more difficult for the Partnership to attract qualified applicants for financial advisor positions. The Partnership relies heavily on referrals from its current financial advisors in recruiting new financial advisors, as well asand current financial advisors participatingmay be less effective in a retirement transition plan, could negatively impactrecruiting potential new financial advisors through referrals during times of market volatility and industry change. Additionally, new financial advisors have and may continue to encounter difficulties developing or expanding their businesses, specifically in times of market volatility. There can be no assurance that the Partnership’s profitabilityPartnership will be able to grow, retain, develop and capital if the increased compensation does not result in greater retention ofsupport its financial advisors and clients orit may experience increased productivity.

In orderfinancial advisor attrition due to attract candidatesincreased competition from other financial services companies and efforts by those firms to becomerecruit its financial advisors,advisors. Furthermore, periods with lower firm profitability and revenue result in decreases in variable and commission-based compensation, and there can be no assurance that the attrition rates the Partnership provides new financial advisors, for specified periods of time, a minimum base compensation as well as certain bonuses based onhas experienced in the amount of new assets gathered. The intent is to attract a greater number of high quality recruits with an enhanced level of base compensation in order to serve more clients and meet the Partnership’s growth objectives. If financial advisor compensation doespast will not result in a corresponding increase in the level of productivity and retention rate of these financial advisors, then this additional compensation could negatively impact the Partnership’s financial performance in future periods. Additionally, thefuture.

16

18


PART I

Item 1.1A. Risk Factors, continued

Partnership's compensation programs have resulted in higher costs to support the firm's growth and business model that will increase the cumulative investment in each branch.

In order to better transition clients to a new financial advisor when their current financial advisor retires, as well as to retain quality financial advisors until retirement, the Partnership offers individually tailored retirement transition plans to financial advisors. These retirement transition plans may offer increased financial consideration prior to and after retirement for financial advisors who provide client transition services in accordance with a retirement and transition employment agreement. If this increased financial consideration does not increase client asset retention or help to retain quality financial advisors until retirement, the additional financial consideration could negatively impact the Partnership’s profitability and capital in future periods. In addition, the Partnership expects that the retirement transition plans will result in higher financial advisor compensation expense in the future.

BRANCH OFFICE SYSTEMThe Partnership’s system of maintaining branch offices primarily staffed by one financial advisor may expose the Partnership to risk of loss or liability from the activities of the financial advisorsbranch team and to increases in rent related to increased real property values.

The majority of the Partnership’s branch offices are staffed by a single financial advisor and a branch office administrator.BTSM. Branch offices do not have an onsite supervisor as would be found at broker-dealers with multi-broker branches. The Partnership’s primary supervisory activity is conducted fromby its home offices.office associates. Although this method of supervision is designed to comply with all applicable industry and regulatory requirements, it is possible that the Partnership is exposed to a risk of loss arising from alleged imprudent or illegal actions of its financial advisors.advisors and/or BTSMs. Furthermore, the Partnership may be exposed to further losses if additional time passes before its supervisory personnel detect problem activity.

The Partnership maintains personal financial and account information and other documents and instruments for its clients at its branch offices, both physically and in electronic format. Despite reasonable precautions, because the branch offices are relatively small and some are in remote locations, the security systems at these branch offices may not prevent theft of such information. If security of a branch is breached and personal financial and account information is stolen, the Partnership’s clients may suffer financial harm and the Partnership could incur financial harm, suffer reputational damage and face regulatory issues.

In addition, the Partnership leases its branch office spaces and a material increase in the value of real property across a broad geography may increase the amount of rent paid, which will negatively impact the Partnership’s profitability. Further, the Partnership is currently focused on placing financial advisors in urban markets, which tend to have higher rent costs and could negatively impact the Partnership's profitability.

Risks Related to Liquidity and Capital

LIQUIDITY — The Partnership’s business in the securities industry requires that sufficient liquidity be available to maintain its business activities, and it may not always have access to sufficient funds.

Liquidity, or ready access to funds, is essential to the Partnership’s business. A tight credit market could have a negative impact on the Partnership’s ability to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet its working capital needs. Short-term and long-term financing are two sources of liquidity that could be affected by rising interest rates resulting in unattractive credit terms or a market in which lenders may reduce their lending to borrowers. There is no assurance that financing will be available at attractive terms, or at all, in the future. Additionally, the Partnership's access to funds held at the broker-dealer is subject to regulatory capital requirements and may require approval from regulators. A significant decrease in the Partnership’s access to funds could negatively affect its business and financial management in addition to its reputation in the industry.

A significant volume of withdrawals by limited partners would reduce the Partnership's available liquidity and capital. Limited partners who finance all or a portion of their limited partnership interests with bank loans must pay interest on their loan regardless of the amount of distributions received, and therefore may be more likely to request the withdrawal of capital to repay such obligations.

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the Enterprise Leadership Team ("ELT"), as defined in the Partnership Agreement), who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions. In limited circumstances, a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while they still have an outstanding Partnership loan. Loans made by the Partnership to such partners are generally for a period of one year but are expected to be renewed and bear interest at the greater of the Prime Rate for the last business day of the prior fiscal month or 3.25% per annum. The Partnership has full recourse against any partner that defaults on loan obligations to the Partnership. However, there is no assurance that partners will be able to repay the interest and/or the principal amount of their Partnership loans at or prior to maturity, which may adversely impact the Partnership.

19


PART I

Item 1A. Risk Factors, continued

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS; UNIFORM NET CAPITAL AND CUSTOMER PROTECTION RULES — The Uniform Net Capital Rule imposes minimum net capital requirements and could limit the Partnership’s ability to engage in certain activities which are crucial to its business. The Customer Protection Rule may limit the rate of return the Partnership could earn on cash and investments depending on trends in the banking industry.

Adequacy of capital is vitally important to broker-dealers, and lack of sufficient capital may limit the Partnership’s ability to compete effectively. In particular, lack of sufficient capital or compliance with the Uniform Net Capital Rule may limit Edward Jones’ ability to commit to certain securities activities such as trading and its ability to expand margin account balances, as well as its commitment to new activities requiring an investment of capital. FINRA regulations and the Uniform Net Capital Rule may restrict Edward Jones’ ability to expand its business operations, including opening new branch offices or hiring additional financial advisors. Consequently, a significant operating loss or an extraordinary charge against net capital could adversely affect Edward Jones’ ability to expand or even maintain its present levels of business.

Pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule, the Partnership has cash and investments segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients. Banking regulations and the interest rate environment may also impact the Partnership's ability to continue to find financial institutions at which to place those segregated client funds and earn a reasonable rate of return on those funds. Additionally, the Partnership has significant investments in U.S. treasuries and certificates of deposit to help facilitate cash management for the firm and regulatory reserve requirements for its clients. In the event of a significant and sudden change to the customer reserve requirements, the Partnership may experience liquidity restraints and have to sell the investments at a loss, which may negatively impact the Partnership's profitability.

In the U.S., Edward Jones may be required to restrict its withdrawal of Partnership capital in order to meet its net capital requirements. In addition to the regulatory requirements applicable to Edward Jones, Trust Co. and EJ Canada are subject to regulatory capital requirements in the U.S. and in Canada, respectively. Failure by the Partnership to maintain the required regulatory capital for any of its subsidiaries may subject it to disciplinary actions by the SEC, FINRA, New SRO, OCC or other regulatory bodies, which could ultimately require its liquidation.

LACK OF CAPITAL PERMANENCY — Because the Partnership’s capital is subject to mandatory redemption either upon the death or withdrawal request of a partner, the capital is not permanent and a significant mandatory redemption could lead to a substantial reduction in the Partnership’s capital, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s business.

Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, a partner’s capital is required to be redeemed by the Partnership in the event of the partner's death, subject to compliance with ongoing regulatory capital requirements. In addition, partners may request withdrawals from their capital accounts, subject to certain limitations on the timing of those withdrawals and regulatory capital requirements. Accordingly, the Partnership’s capital is not permanent and is dependent upon current and future partners to both maintain their existing capital and make additional capital contributions in the Partnership. Any withdrawal requests by general partners, subordinated limited partners or limited partners would reduce the Partnership’s available liquidity and capital. The Managing Partner may decline a withdrawal request if that withdrawal would result in the Partnership violating any agreement, such as a loan agreement, or any applicable laws, rules or regulations.

Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, limited partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership are repaid their capital in three equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their withdrawal notice is received by the Managing Partner. The capital of general partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership is converted to subordinated limited partnership capital or, at the discretion of the Managing Partner, redeemed by the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners requesting withdrawal are repaid their capital in six equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their request for withdrawal of capital is received by the Managing Partner. The Managing Partner has discretion to waive or modify these withdrawal restrictions and to accelerate the return of capital. Redemptions upon the death of a partner are generally required to be made within six months of the date of death. Due to the nature of the redemption requirements of the Partnership's capital as set forth in the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership accounts for its capital as a liability, in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). If the Partnership’s capital declines by a substantial amount due to partner deaths or withdrawals, the Partnership may not have sufficient capital to operate or expand its business or to meet withdrawal requests by partners. The risk of withdrawal requests could increase during periods of decreased profitability or potential losses, which may impact the Partnership's results of operations.

20


PART I

Item 1A. Risk Factors, continued

CREDIT RISK — The Partnership is subject to credit risk due to the nature of the transactions it processes for its clients.

The Partnership is exposed to the risk that third parties who owe it money, securities or other assets will not meet their obligations. Many of the transactions in which the Partnership engages expose it to credit risk in the event of default by its counterparty or client, such as cash balances held at various major U.S. financial institutions, which typically exceed FDIC insurance coverage limits. In addition, the Partnership’s credit risk may be increased when the collateral it holds cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices insufficient to recover the full amount of the obligation due to the Partnership.

Risks Related to Business Operations

UPGRADE OF TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS — Inefficient technology can have a material negative effect on the client and colleague experience and the Partnership’s operations, profitability and reputation. The Partnership will continue to engage in significant digital initiatives in the future which may be costly and could lead to additional disruptions.

The Partnership has engaged in significant digital initiatives to improve the efficiency and performance of its technology to support branch teams in serving clients and expects to continue to do so in the future. Such initiatives are not only necessary to better meet the needs of and add value for the Partnership’s clients and branch teams, but also to satisfy new industry standards and practices, anticipate industry and competitive changes, better secure the transmission of clients’ information on the Partnership’s systems, enhance support for a hybrid remote and in-office workforce and improve operational efficiency. If the Partnership is unable to execute on its digital initiatives to enhance its systems and provide faster, more efficient technology for its branch teams to better serve clients, it may experience decreased client and colleague satisfaction, which could negatively impact the Partnership's operations, profitability and reputation. Additionally, the Partnership's inability to enhance technology at the pace of the industry could negatively impact its ability to attract and retain clients.

The Partnership's increased cost from these digital initiatives may continue to adversely impact the Partnership's profitability. Furthermore, with any major digital initiative or system replacement, there will be a period of education and adjustment for the branch and home office associates utilizing the tool or system. Following any upgrade or replacement, if the Partnership’s systems, tools or equipment do not operate properly, are disabled or fail to perform due to increased demand (which might occur during market upswings or downturns), or if a new tool, system or system upgrade contains a major problem, the Partnership could experience inefficiencies and unanticipated disruptions in service, including interrupted trading, slower response times, decreased client service and client satisfaction, poor user experience and delays in the introduction of new products and services, any of which could result in financial losses, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or reputational damage.

TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONAL DISRUPTIONS — The inability to successfully process client transactions due to volume and volatility can have a material negative effect on the Partnership’s profitability, operations, reputation and regulatory compliance.

The Partnership processes, records and monitors a significant amount of client transactions daily. Transaction volume and volatility may result in unanticipated system interruptions, errors or downtime due to system capacity that could have a significant impact on the Partnership's profitability, operations and reputation. Significant volatility in the number of client transactions and rebalancing activity may cause operational problems such as a higher incidence of failures to deliver and receive securities and errors in processing transactions, and such volatility may also result in increased personnel and related processing costs that could have a negative impact on the Partnership's profitability. In the event the Partnership's systems are unable to handle transaction volatility and volumes, the Partnership may experience extended periods of downtime to restore system functionality that could affect its ability to process and settle client transactions timely and accurately, potentially resulting in financial losses, disciplinary action by governmental agencies, SROs and/or other regulators and damage to the Partnership's reputation. Additionally, the inability of the Partnership’s systems to accommodate a significant increase in the volume of transactions could also constrain its ability to expand its business. Furthermore, technology and operational disruptions could result in inaccurate books and records, which would expose the Partnership to disciplinary action by governmental agencies, SROs and other regulators.

21


PART I

Item 1A. Risk Factors, continued

INVESTMENT ADVISORY ACTIVITIES — The Partnership’s investment advisory businesses may be affected by the investment performance of its portfolios and operational risks associated with the size of the programs.

Poor investment returns, due to either general market conditions or underperformance of programs constructed by the Partnership (relative to the programs of the Partnership’s competitors or to benchmarks) may affect the Partnership's ability to retain existing AUC and to attract new clients or additional assets from existing clients. Reductions in AUC in programs which generate asset-based fees may result in a decrease in net revenue.

Based on the current size of the investment advisory programs, the programs may experience concentration risks associated with the level and percentage of holdings in individual funds within the programs which could result in additional operational and regulatory risks for the Partnership. As a result of the size of the programs, the Partnership is also exposed to the risk that trading volumes and program activity could impact the Partnership's ability to process transactions in a timely manner.

PROPRIETARY MUTUAL FUNDS — The Partnership’s business may be affected by operational risks, investment performance and the heightened regulatory requirements as a result of sponsoring proprietary mutual funds and managing sub-advisers and other third-party service providers.

As a sponsor and investment adviser to proprietary mutual funds, the Partnership, through its ownership of Olive Street, may experience additional operational risk and regulatory requirements attributed to Olive Street's responsibilities to oversee the investment management of mutual funds. Due to the size and number of sub-advisers within the proprietary mutual funds, there is a heightened risk associated with the Partnership's ability to perform ongoing due diligence and supervision. Poor investment returns, due to either general market conditions or underperformance, of proprietary mutual funds may affect the Partnership's ability to expand the BB Trust, develop new mutual funds, attract new client assets, and retain existing client assets.

RELIANCE ON THIRD PARTIES — The Partnership’s dependence on third-party organizations exposes the Partnership to disruption or loss if their products and services are no longer offered or supported or develop defects.

The Partnership incurs obligations to its clients which are supported by obligations from firms within the industry, especially those firms with which the Partnership maintains relationships by which securities transactions are executed. The Partnership is substantially dependent upon the operational capacity and capability of NSCC, DTC, FICC and CDS. The inability of an organizationthese organizations with which the Partnership does a large volume of business to promptly meet itsprocess securities transactions and satisfy clearing and depository obligations could result in substantial losses to the Partnership and delays in or disruptions to the executiondelivery of clients'cash or securities transactions.  to clients.

The Partnership is particularly dependent on Broadridge, which acts as the Partnership’s primary vendor for providing accounting and record-keeping for client accounts in both the U.S. and Canada. The Partnership’s communications and information systems are integrated with the information systems of Broadridge. There are relatively few alternative providers to Broadridge and although the Partnership has analyzed the feasibility of performing Broadridge’s functions internally, the Partnership may not be able to do it in a cost-effective manner or otherwise. The Partnership also utilizes certain products and services of BNY Mellon for mutual fund investments held by the Partnership’s clients and for certain trading activities. BNY Mellon’s products and services enable the Partnership to provide certain services to mutual funds, primarily shareholder accounting. Consequently, any new computer systems or software packages implemented by these third parties which are not compatible with the Partnership’s systems, or any other interruption or the cessation of service by these third parties as a result of systems limitations or failures, could cause unanticipated disruptions in the

17


PART I

Item 1. Risk Factors, continued

Partnership’s business which may result in financial losses and/or disciplinary action by governmental agencies, SROs and/or other regulators.

A significant portion of the Partnership's revenue comes from commissions and service fees that the Partnership earns from third-party mutual fund and insurance companies for providing certain distribution and marketing support services for those companies' products held by Edward Jones clients. For mutual funds, those commissions and service fees are based on the terms of mutual fund prospectuses. Substantial changes to the structure of the commissions and fees paid to the Partnership could have an adverse impact on asset-based and trading revenues.

UPGRADE OF TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS

22


PART I

Item 1A. Risk Factors, continued

INFORMATION SECURITY INCIDENTSThe Partnership will engage in significant technology initiatives in the future which may be costly and could lead to disruptions.

The Partnership has engaged in significant technology initiatives and expects to continue to do so in the future. Such initiatives are not only necessary to better meet the needs of and add value for the Partnership’s clients, but also to satisfy new industry standards and practices, anticipate industry and competitive changes, better secure the transmission of clients’ information on the Partnership’s systems, and improve operational efficiency. With any major system replacement, there will be a period of education and adjustment for the branch and home office associates utilizing the system. Following any upgrade or replacement, if the Partnership’s systems or equipment do not operate properly, are disabled or fail to perform due to increased demand (which might occur during market upswings or downturns), or if a new system or system upgrade contains a major problem, the Partnership could experience unanticipated disruptions in service, including interrupted trading, slower response times, decreased client service and client satisfaction, and delays in the introduction of new products and services, any of which could result in financial losses, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or reputational damage. Further, the inability of the Partnership’s systems to accommodate a significant increase in volume of transactions also could constrain its ability to expand its business.

SECURITY BREACHES — Security breaches of Information security incidents affecting the Partnership’s systems, or those of third parties, could lead to significant financial loss to the Partnership’s business and operations, significant liability, and harm to the Partnership’s reputation and client relationships.

The Partnership relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business, including the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information. The Partnership’s home office facilitiesoffices and its existing communications and information systems, including its backup systems, as well as the systems of third parties the Partnership relies on, are vulnerable to information security incidents, including breaches, damages anddamage or interruptions from human error, sabotage, cybersecurity attacks such as ransomware, computer viruses and other malicious code, intentional acts of vandalism, attempts by others to gain unauthorized access to the Partnership’s systems, and similar events. The risk of these types of information security breachesincidents occurring is continuing. The Partnership has processes in place designed to safeguard and monitor against information security breachesincidents and other disruptions of its systems and those of third parties the Partnership relies on and has not experienced, to date, any material losses related to cybersecurity attacks or other information security breaches.incidents. However, there can be no assurance the Partnership will not suffer such losses in the future.

If aan information security breach wereincident was to occur, such an event could substantially disrupt the Partnership’s business by jeopardizingexposing the Partnership’s, its clients’ or third parties’ confidential information or causing interruptions or malfunctions in the Partnership’s or third parties’ operations. In order to serve clients, the Partnership maintains personal information about current, former and prospective clients, partners and associates that is subject to various laws and regulations. Security breaches ofincidents involving this type of information could subject the Partnership to significant liability and expenses that may not be covered by insurance. In addition, the Partnership’s reputation and business may suffer if such clients or associates experience data or financial loss from a significant security breach.incident.


18


PART I

Item 1. Risk Factors, continued

TRANSACTION VOLUME, CAPACITY, AND VOLATILITY — Significant increases and decreases in the number of transactions by the Partnership’s clients can have a material negative effect on the Partnership’s profitability and its ability to efficiently process and settle these transactions.

Significant volatility in the number of client transactions and rebalancing activity may result in operational problems such as a higher incidence of failures to deliver and receive securities and errors in processing transactions, and such volatility may also result in increased personnel and related processing costs. The Partnership may experience adverse effects on its profitability resulting from significant reductions in securities sales and may encounter operational problems arising from unanticipated high transaction volume because the Partnership is not able to control such fluctuations.

In addition, significant transaction volume could result in inaccurate books and records, which would expose the Partnership to disciplinary action by governmental agencies, SROs and other regulators.

BUSINESS CONTINUITY RISK — Any substantial disruption to the Partnership’s business and operations, could lead to significant financial loss to the Partnership’s business and operations, as well as harm the Partnership’s reputation and client relationships.

The Partnership's business and operations relies heavily on its branch office network, home office facilities and technology systems, which are all vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other similar events. The Partnership has processes in place designed to safeguard against and monitor for business interruptions and related losses. However, there can be no assurance the Partnership will not suffer such losses in the future. Such an event could substantially disrupt the Partnership’s business by causing physical harm to its branch office network, home office facilities and its technology systems. In addition, the Partnership’s reputation and business may suffer if clients experience data or financial loss from a significant interruption.

The Partnership and its third-party vendors have data centers in separate regions of the United States. These data centers act as disaster recovery and redundant sites with each other. While these data centers are designed to be redundant with one another, a prolonged interruption of any site might result in a delay of service and substantial costs and expenses. While the Partnership has disaster recovery and business continuity planning processes, and interruption and property insurance to mitigate and help protect it against such losses, there can be no assurance that the Partnership is fully protected from such an event.

CANADA OPERATIONS — The Partnership has made, and may be required to continue to make, substantial investments to support its Canada operations, which have not yet achieved profitability.consistently been profitable.

The Partnership commenced operations in Canada in 1994 and plans to continue to expand its branch system in Canada. Canada operations have historically operated at a substantial deficit fromsince inception. The Partnership intends to continue to operateHowever, Canada became profitable in Canada,2021 which may require substantial additional investmentscontinued in its Canada operations to address short-term liquidity, capital, or expansion needs.2022. The Partnership has initiatives in place designed to accomplish the objectives of increasing revenue, controlling expenses and intentionally growing the number of financial advisors in order to achievemaintain profitability in Canada. Even though client assets under care in Canada have grown,without future capital support from the Partnership. However, there is no guarantee that Canada will maintain profitability, and the Partnership has not historically been ablemay have to grow the number of financial advisors and client assets under careprovide additional support to a level that would result in achieving its objectives. There is no assurance Canada operations will ultimately become profitable.address short-term liquidity, capital or expansion needs. For further information on Canada operations, see Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

TAX LAW CHANGES

CASH AND LENDING SOLUTIONSThe tax law changes signed in 2017 may put the Partnership at a disadvantage in recruiting and retaining financial advisors.

On December 22, 2017, U.S. federal tax reform legislation was enacted that generally creates favorable tax treatment for owners of pass-through entities with taxable income. Many of the Partnership's financial advisors are employees and do not qualify for the favorable tax treatment. Further, the tax reform legislation limits the deductibility of certain business expenses. As a result, the Partnership's ability to recruit and retain financial advisors against certain competitor models could be impacted. The Partnership has reviewed the tax reform legislation, and the underlying tax regulations and has taken appropriate steps to respond. It is difficult to predict at this time, however, the potential adverse impact that the legislation and regulations may have on the Partnership.

19


PART I

Item 1. Risk Factors, continued

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS; UNIFORM NET CAPITAL AND CUSTOMER PROTECTION RULES — The Uniform Net Capital Rule imposes minimum net capital requirements and could limit the Partnership’s ability to engage in certain activities which are crucial to its business. The Customer Protection Rule may limit the rate of return the Partnership could earn on cash and investments depending on trends in the banking industry.

Adequacy of capital is vitally important to broker-dealers, and lack of sufficient capital may limit the Partnership’s ability to compete effectively. In particular, lack of sufficient capital or compliance with the Uniform Net Capital Rule may limit Edward Jones’ ability to commit to certain securities activities such as trading and its ability to expand margin account balances, as well as its commitment to new activities requiring an investment of capital. FINRA regulations and the Uniform Net Capital Rule may restrict Edward Jones’ ability to expand its business operations, including opening new branch offices or hiring additional financial advisors. Consequently, a significant operating loss or an extraordinary charge against net capital could adversely affect Edward Jones’ ability to expand or even maintain its present levels of business.

Pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule, the Partnership has cash and investments segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients. Banking regulations, however, may impact the Partnership's ability to find financial institutions at which to place those segregated client funds and earn a reasonable rate of return on those funds or Partnership cash and investments.

In the U.S., Edward Jones may be required to restrict its withdrawal of Partnership capital in order to meet its net capital requirements. In addition to the regulatory requirements applicable to Edward Jones, Edward Jones Trust Company and the Partnership's Canada broker-dealer subsidiary are subject to regulatory capital requirements in the U.S. and in Canada, respectively. Failure by the Partnership to maintain the required net capital for any of its subsidiaries may subject it to disciplinary actions by the SEC, FINRA, IIROC, OCC or other regulatory bodies, which could ultimately require its liquidation.

LACK OF CAPITAL PERMANENCY — Because the Partnership’s capital is subject to mandatory redemption either upon the deathrisk that potential new strategies, products, structures and relationships to make cash and lending solutions available to the Partnership's clients may not be successful; and if successful, the Partnership may contribute more capital, experience increased costs to support operations and could be subject to risks related to additional regulatory oversight, potential legislative changes and uncertainty of the resulting benefits for the Partnership, its partners, or withdrawal requestits clients.

On October 6, 2022, the Partnership withdrew the applications it submitted on July 1, 2020 to the FDIC and Utah Department of Financial Institutions in connection with a partner, the capital is not permanent and a significant mandatory redemption could lead to a substantial reductionproposed Utah-chartered industrial bank (Edward Jones Bank), as disclosed in the Partnership’s capital, which could,Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 7, 2022. The Partnership is actively pursuing additional strategies, products, structures and third-party relationships (collectively, "initiatives") to meet clients' saving, spending and borrowing needs and help clients achieve financially what is most important to them, including beginning to offer securities-based loans to clients in turn, have a material adverse effect oncertain U.S. states, and applying for applicable state lending licenses, where required. The Partnership cannot reliably predict the Partnership’s business.

Under the termstiming or outcome of the Partnership Agreement, a partner’s capital is requiredinitiatives and related state licenses, and whether and to be redeemed bywhat extent the initiatives would yield benefits for the Partnership, in the eventits partners, and its clients. The Partnership's exploration of the partner's death, subject to compliance with ongoing regulatory capital requirements. In addition, partnersthese initiatives may request withdrawals from their capital accounts, subject to certain limitations on the timing of those withdrawals and regulatory capital requirements. Accordingly, the Partnership’s capital is not permanent and is dependent upon current and future partners to both maintain their existing capital and make additional capital contributions in the Partnership. Any withdrawal requests by general partners, subordinated limited partners or limited partners would reduce the Partnership’s available liquidity and capital. The Managing Partner may decline a withdrawal request if that withdrawal would result in the Partnership violating any agreement, such asincurring substantial costs and committing a loan agreement, or any applicable laws, rules or regulations.

Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, limited partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership are repaid their capital in three equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their withdrawal notice is received by the Managing Partner. The capital of general partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership is converted to subordinated limited partnership capital or, at the discretion of the Managing Partner, redeemed by the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners requesting withdrawal are repaid their capital in six equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their request for withdrawalsignificant amount of capital is received byto support their development and initial operations. Factors that could affect the Managing Partner. The Partnership’s Managing Partner has discretion to waive or modify these withdrawal restrictionsprofitability and to accelerate the return of capital. Redemptions upon the death of a partner are generally required to be made within six months of the date of death. Due to the nature of the redemption requirementssuccess of the Partnership's initiatives include, but are not limited to, unanticipated additional costs, the need for additional capital as set forth in the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership accounts for its capital as a liability, in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). If the Partnership’s capital declines by a substantial amount due to partner deathssupport, operational challenges, uncertain client demand, legislative changes and regulatory changes, compliance and oversight, any or withdrawals, the Partnership may not have sufficient capital to operate or expand its business or to meet withdrawal requests by partners. The riskall of withdrawal requests could increase during periods of decreased profitability or potential losses, which may adversely impact the Partnership's results of operations.operations, financial condition and liquidity.


2023


PART I

Item 1.1A. Risk Factors, continued

INTEREST RATE ENVIRONMENT — The Partnership’s profitability could be impacted by interest rate changes.

The Partnership is exposed to risk from changes in interest rates. Such changes in interest rates impact the income from interest-earning assets, primarily receivables from clients on margin balances and short-term investments. The changes in interest rates may also have an impact on the expense related to liabilities that finance these assets, such as amounts payable to clients.

The Partnership's revenue earned from certain cash solutions products is impacted by changes in interest rates, with lower interest rates negatively impacting revenue. Further, in low interest rate environments the Partnership has waived certain fees to maintain a positive client yield, which could happen in the future if interest rates were to decline.

Changes in interest rates could also pose a risk of loss resulting from maintaining inventory in fixed income securities.

CREDIT RISK — The Partnership is subject to credit risk due to the nature of the transactions it processes for its clients.

The Partnership is exposed to the risk that third parties who owe it money, securities or other assets will not meet their obligations. Many of the transactions in which the Partnership engages expose it to credit risk in the event of default by its counterparty or client, such as cash balances held at various major U.S. financial institutions, which typically exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage limits. In addition, the Partnership’s credit risk may be increased when the collateral it holds cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices insufficient to recover the full amount of the obligation due to the Partnership.

See Part III, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance for more information about the Partnership’s credit risk.

INVESTMENT ADVISORY ACTIVITIES — The Partnership’s investment advisory businesses may be affected by the investment performance of its portfolios and operational risks associated with the size of the programs.

Poor investment returns, due to either general market conditions or underperformance of programs constructed by the Partnership (relative to the programs of the Partnership’s competitors or to benchmarks) may affect the Partnership's ability to retain existing assets under care and to attract new clients or additional assets from existing clients. Should there be a reduction in assets under care in programs which generate asset-based fees, the Partnership would experience a decrease in net revenue.

Based on the current size of the investment advisory programs, the programs may experience concentration risks associated with the level and percentage of holdings in individual funds within the programs which could result in additional operational and regulatory risks for the Partnership. As a result of the size of the programs, the Partnership is also exposed to the risk that trading volumes and program activity could impact the Partnership's ability to process transactions in a timely manner.

PROPRIETARY MUTUAL FUNDS — The Partnership’s business may be affected by operational risks, investment performance and the heightened regulatory requirements it faces as a result of sponsoring proprietary mutual funds and managing sub-advisers and other third party service providers.

As a sponsor and investment adviser to proprietary mutual funds, the Partnership, through its ownership of Olive Street and Passport Research, may experience additional operational risk and regulatory requirements attributed to Olive Street's and Passport Research's responsibilities to oversee the investment management of mutual funds. Due to the size and number of sub-advisers within the proprietary mutual funds, there is a heightened risk associated with the Partnership's ability to perform ongoing due diligence and supervision. Poor investment returns, due to either general market conditions or underperformance, of proprietary mutual funds may affect the Partnership's ability to expand the BB Trust, develop new mutual funds, attract new client assets, and retain existing client assets.


21


PART I

Item 1. Risk Factors, continued

RISKS RELATED TO AN INVESTMENT IN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS

HOLDING COMPANY — JFC is a holding company; as a consequence, JFC’s ability to satisfy its obligations under the Partnership Agreement will depend in large part on the ability of its subsidiaries to pay distributions or dividends to JFC, which is restricted by law, regulation and contractual obligations.

Since JFC is a holding company, the principal sources of cash available to it are distributions or dividends from its subsidiaries and other payments under intercompany arrangements with its subsidiaries. Accordingly, JFC’s ability to generate the funds necessary to satisfy its obligations with respect to the Interests, including the 7½% payment to limited partners pursuant to the Partnership Agreement (the "7½% Payment"), will be dependent on distributions, dividends, and intercompany payments from its subsidiaries, and if those sources are insufficient, JFC may be unable to satisfy such obligations.

JFC’s principal operating subsidiaries, including Edward Jones, are subject to various statutory and regulatory restrictions applicable to broker-dealers generally that limit the amount of cash distributions, dividends, loans and advances that those subsidiaries may pay to JFC. Regulations relating to capital requirements affecting some of JFC’s subsidiaries also restrict their ability to pay distributions or dividends and make loans to JFC. See Part I, Item 1 – Business – Regulation for a discussion of these requirements.

In addition, JFC’s subsidiaries may be restricted under the terms of their financing arrangements from paying distributions or dividends to JFC, or may be required to maintain specified levels of capital. Moreover, JFC or its subsidiaries may enter into financing arrangements in the future which may include additional restrictions or debt covenant requirements further restricting distributions to JFC, which may impact JFC’s ability to make distributions to its limited partners.

SUFFICIENCY OF DISTRIBUTIONS TO REPAY FINANCING — Limited partners may finance their purchase of the Interests with a bank loan. The Partnership does not guarantee those loans, and distributions may be insufficient to pay the interest or principal due on the loans.

Many limited partners finance the purchases of their Interests by obtaining personal bank loans. Any such bank loan agreement is between the limited partner and the bank. The Partnership performs certain administrative functions for the majority of limited partner bank loans, but does not guarantee the bank loans, nor can limited partners pledge their Interests as collateral for the bank loan. Limited partners who have chosen to finance a portion of the purchase price of their Interests assume all risks associated with the loan, including the legal obligation to repay the loan.

There is no assurance that distributions from the Partnership will be sufficient to pay the interest on a limited partner’s loan or repay the principal amount of the loan at or prior to its maturity. Furthermore, in the event the Partnership experiences a loss which leads to its liquidation, there is no assurance there will be sufficient capital available to distribute to the limited partners for the repayment of any loans.

NON-VOTING INTERESTS; NON-TRANSFERABILITY OF INTERESTS; ABSENCE OF MARKET, PRICE FOR INTERESTS — The Interests are non-voting and non-transferable, no market for the Interests exists or is expected to develop, and the price only represents book value.

None of the limited partners in their capacity as limited partners may vote or otherwise participate in the management of the Partnership’s business. The Managing Partner has the authority to amend the Partnership Agreement without the consent of the limited partners, subordinated limited partners or general partners. None of the limited partners may sell, pledge, exchange, transfer or assign their Interests without the express written consent of the Managing Partner (which is not expected to be given).

Because there is no market for the Interests, there is no fair market value for the Interests. The price ($1,000 per Interest) at which the Interests were offered represents the book value of each Interest. The Partnership's capital could decline to a point where the book value of the Interests could be less than the price paid.


22

24


PART I

Item 1.1A. Risk Factors, continued

RISK OF DILUTION — The Interests may be diluted from time to time, which could lead to decreased returns to the limited partners.

The Managing Partner has the ability, in his or hertheir sole discretion, to issue additional Interests or Partnership capital. The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January 12, 2018,December 8, 2021, to register $450 million$700 of Interests to be issuedissuable pursuant to the Partnership's 2021 Plan. In early 2023, the Partnership issued $568 of Interests under the 2021 Plan, increasing the number of limited partners to 34,120. Proceeds from the offering under the 2021 Plan are expected to be used to fund growth needs or for other purposes. The remaining $132 may be issued at the discretion of the Managing Partner in the future. In November 2022, the Partnership deregistered the remaining $60 of unsold Interests under its 2018 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2018 Plan").  The Partnership issued approximately $380 million and $1 million of Interests under the 2018 Plan on January 2, 2019 and January 2, 2020, respectively. The remaining $69 million of Interests may be issued under the 2018 Plan at the discretion of the Managing Partner in the future. Proceeds from the offering under the 2018 Plan are expected to be used for working capital and general firm purposes and to ensure there is adequate general liquidity of the Partnership for future needs.

The issuance of Interests will reduce the percentage of participation in net income by general partners and subordinated limited partners. Further, the issuance of additional Interests will decrease the Partnership’s net interest income by the 7½% Payment for the additional Interests, and holders of existing Interests may suffer decreased returns on their investment because the amount of the Partnership’s net income they participate in may be reduced as a consequence. Accordingly, the issuance of additional Interests will reduce the Partnership’s net interest income and profitability.

In 2019,2022, the Partnership retained 13.8% of the general partners’ net income as capital which is credited monthly to the general partners’ Adjusted Capital Contributions (as defined in the Partnership Agreement). Retention for 20202023 is expected to remain at a similar level as 2019.2022. Such retention, along with any additional capital contributions by general partners, will reduce the percentage of participation in net income by limited partners. There is no requirement to retain a minimum amount of general partners’ net income, and the percentage of retained net income could change at any time in the future. In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, the percentage of income allocated to limited partners is reset annually and the amount of retained general partner income reduces the income allocated to limited partners.

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY; INDEMNIFICATION — The Partnership Agreement limits the liability of the Managing Partner and general partners by indemnifying them under certain circumstances, which may limit a limited partner’s rights against them and could reduce the accumulated profits distributable to limited partners.

The Partnership Agreement provides that none of the general partners, including the Managing Partner, will be liable to any person for any acts or omissions performed or omitted by such partner on behalf of the Partnership (even if such action, omission or failure to act constituted negligence) as long as such partner has (a) not committed fraud, (b) acted in subjective good faith or in a manner which did not involve intentional misconduct, a knowing violation of law or which was grossly negligent, and (c) not derived improper personal benefit.

The Partnership also must indemnify any general partner, including the Managing Partner, from any claim in connection to acts or omissions performed in connection with the business of the Partnership and from costs or damages stemming from a claim attributable to acts or omissions by such partner, unless such act or omission was not in good faith on behalf of the Partnership, was not in a manner reasonably believed by the partner to be within the scope of his or hertheir authority, and was not in the best interests of the Partnership. The Partnership does not have to indemnify any general partner, including the Managing Partner, in instances of fraud, for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct, a knowing violation of the law, or gross negligence, or for any acts or omissions where such partner derived improper personal benefit.

As a result of these provisions, the limited partners have more limited rights against such partners than they would have absent the limitations in the Partnership Agreement. Indemnification of the general partners could deplete the Partnership’s assets unless the Partnership's indemnification obligation is covered by insurance, which the Partnership may or may not obtain, or which insurance may not be available at a reasonable price or at all or in an amount sufficient to cover the indemnification obligation. The Partnership Agreement does not provide for indemnification of limited partners.


2325


PART I

Item 1.1A. Risk Factors, continued

RISK OF LOSS — The Interests are equity interests in the Partnership. As a result, and in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, the right of return of a limited partner’s Capital Contribution (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) is subordinate to all existing and future claims of the Partnership’s general creditors, including any of its subordinated creditors.

In the event of a partial or total liquidation of the Partnership or in the event there were insufficient Partnership assets to satisfy the claims of its general creditors, the limited partners may not be entitled to receive their entire Capital Contribution amounts back. Limited partner capital accounts are not guaranteed. However, as a class, the limited partners would be entitled to receive the return of their aggregate Capital Contributions before the return of any capital contributions to the subordinated limited partners or the general partners. If the Partnership suffers losses in any year but liquidation procedures described above are not undertaken and the Partnership continues, the amounts of such losses would be absorbed in the capital accounts of the partners as described in the Partnership Agreement, and each limited partner in any event remains entitled to receive the 7½% Payments under the terms of the Partnership Agreement. However, as there would be no accumulated profits in such a year, limited partners would not receive any sums representing participation in net income of the Partnership. In addition, although the amount of the 7½% Payments to limited partners are charged as an expense to the Partnership and are payable whether or not the Partnership earns any accumulated profits during any given period, no reserve fund has been set aside to enable the Partnership to make such payments. Therefore, such payments to the limited partners are subject to the Partnership’s ability to service the 7½% Payment, of which there is no assurance.

STATUS AS PARTNER FOR TAX PURPOSES AND TAX RISKS — Limited partners are subject to income tax liabilities on the Partnership’s income, whether or not income is distributed, and may have an increased chance of being audited. Limited partners may also be subject to passive loss rules as a result of their investment.

Limited partners are required to file tax returns and pay income tax in those U.S. states and, in some circumstances, foreign jurisdictions in which the Partnership operates, as well as in the limited partner’s place of residence or domicile. Any costs of obtaining professional tax advice or preparation of tax returns are the responsibility of the limited partner and may be significant. Limited partners are liable for income taxes on their share of the Partnership’s taxable income. The amount of the Partnership's taxable income that is allocated to a limited partner may significantly exceed the amount of the Partnership's net income that is allocated and distributed to the limited partner.

A limited partner’s share of the Partnership’s income or losses could be subject to the passive loss rules. Under specific circumstances, certain income may be classified as portfolio income or passive income for purposes of the passive loss rules. In addition, under certain circumstances, a limited partner may be allocated a share of the Partnership’s passive losses, the deductibility of which will be limited by the passive loss rules.

The Partnership’s income tax returns may be audited by government authorities. Under U.S. federal audit and administrative procedures applicable to partnerships, any U.S. federal income taxes, penalties (including any accuracy-related penalties), and interest resulting from adjustments to Partnership tax items, including adjustments made pursuant to an IRS audit, generally will be imposed on the Partnership in the year in which the adjustments are made or otherwise become final. If, as a result of adjustments to Partnership tax items, the Partnership is required to make payments in respect of taxes, penalties and interest, the cash available for distribution to our partners may be substantially reduced. Moreover, an audit of the Partnership's income tax returns may result in the audit of the returns of the limited partners and may require an amendment of their tax returns with the possibility of interest and penalty assessments.

26


PART I

Item 1A. Risk Factors, continued

FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK FOR CANADA RESIDENTS — Each foreign limited partner has the risk that he or shethey will lose value on his or hertheir investment in the Interests due to fluctuations in the applicable exchange rate; furthermore, foreign limited partners may owe tax on a disposition of the Interests solely as the result of a movement in the applicable exchange rate.

All investors purchase Interests using U.S. dollars. As a result, limited partners who reside in Canada may risk having the value of their investment, expressed in Canadian currency, decrease over time due to movements in the applicable currency exchange rates.value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar. Accordingly, such limited partnerpartners may have a loss upon disposition of his or hertheir investment solely due to a downward fluctuation in the applicable exchange rate.

In addition, changes in exchange rates could have an impact on Canadian federal income tax consequences for a limited partner, if such limited partner is a resident in Canada for purposes of the IncomeCanadian Tax Act (Canada).Act. The disposition by such limited partner of an Interest, including as a result of the withdrawal of the limited partner from the Partnership or the Partnership’s dissolution, may result in the realization of a capital gain (or capital loss) by such limited partner. The amount of such capital gain (or capital loss) generally will be the amount, if any, by which the proceeds of disposition of such Interest, less any reasonable costs of disposition, each expressed in Canadian currency using the exchange rate on the date of disposition, exceed (or are exceeded by) the adjusted cost base of such Interest, expressed in Canadian currency using the exchange rate on the date of each transaction that is relevant in determining the adjusted cost base. Accordingly, because the exchange rate for those currencies may fluctuate between the date or dates on which the adjusted cost base of a limited partner’s Interest is determined and the date on which the Interest is disposed of, a Canadian-resident limited partner may realize a capital gain or capital loss on the disposition of his or hertheir Interest solely as a result of fluctuations in exchange rates.

STATUS AS PARTNER FOR TAX PURPOSES AND TAX RISKS — Limited partners are subject to income tax liabilities on the Partnership’s income, whether or not income is distributed, and may have an increased chance of being audited. Limited partners may also be subject to passive loss rules as a result of their investment.

Limited partners are required to file tax returns and pay income tax in those states and foreign jurisdictions in which the Partnership operates, as well as in the limited partner’s state of residence or domicile. Limited partners are liable for income taxes on their share of the Partnership’s taxable income. The amount of income the limited partner pays tax on can significantly exceed the net income earned on the Interests and the income distributed to such limited partner, which results in a disproportionate share of income being used to pay taxes.


2427


PART III

Item 1. Risk Factors, continued

A limited partner’s share of the Partnership’s income or losses could be subject to the passive loss rules. Under specific circumstances, certain income may be classified as portfolio income or passive income for purposes of the passive loss rules. In addition, under certain circumstances, a limited partner may be allocated a share of the Partnership’s passive losses, the deductibility of which will be limited by the passive loss rules.

The Partnership’s income tax returns may be audited by government authorities. Under U.S. federal audit and administrative procedures applicable to partnerships, any U.S. federal income taxes, penalties, and interest resulting from adjustments to Partnership tax items, including adjustments made pursuant to an IRS audit, generally will be imposed on the Partnership in the year in which the adjustments are made or otherwise become final. If, as a result of adjustments to Partnership tax items, we are required to make payments in respect of taxes, penalties and interest, our cash available for distribution to our partners may be substantially reduced. Moreover, an audit of the Partnership's income tax returns may result in the audit of the returns of the limited partners and may require an amendment of their tax returns with the possibility of interest and penalty assessments.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Partnership primarily conducts its U.S. home office operations from two campus locationscampuses in St. Louis, Missouri and one campus location in Tempe, Arizona. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership had 13 U.S.11 home office buildings. OneThe Partnership owns 10 of the buildings and leases its Canada home office in Mississauga, Ontario and the land for the Tempe, Arizona campus location are leased through an operating lease, and the remaining 12 buildings are owned by the Partnership.  The Partnership also leases its Canada home office facility in Mississauga, Ontario through an operating lease.  campus.

The Partnership also maintains facilities in 15,04415,769 branch locations as of December 31, 2019,2022, which are located in the U.S. and Canada and are predominantly rented under cancelable leases. See Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes 2 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding lease liabilities and related party transactions, respectively.

Refer to Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the Partnership's legal proceedings.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

25


PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDERSTOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

There is no established public trading market for the Partnership’s Interests and their assignment or transfer is prohibited without the express written consent of the Managing Partner (which is not expected to be given). As of February 28, 2020,24, 2023, the Partnership had 24,27334,075 limited partners.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following information sets forth, for the past five years, selected financial data from the audited financial statements.

Summary Consolidated Statements of Income Data:ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

 

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

($ millions, except per unit information and units outstanding)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue

 

$

9,369

 

 

$

8,469

 

 

$

7,506

 

 

$

6,557

 

 

$

6,619

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before allocations to partners

 

$

1,092

 

 

$

990

 

 

$

872

 

 

$

746

 

 

$

838

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income allocated to limited partners per weighted

   average $1,000 equivalent limited partnership

   unit outstanding

 

$

132.22

 

 

$

128.13

 

 

$

121.15

 

 

$

110.55

 

 

$

131.42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited

   partnership units outstanding

 

 

1,256,459

 

 

 

889,502

 

 

 

896,566

 

 

 

908,919

 

 

 

921,747

 

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”), the Partnership presents net income of $0 on its Consolidated Statements of Income.  See Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

Summary Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition Data:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

($ millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

19,317

 

 

$

15,815

 

 

$

17,176

 

 

$

19,424

 

 

$

16,356

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities exclusive of  partnership capital

   subject to mandatory redemption

 

$

15,953

 

 

$

12,960

 

 

$

14,381

 

 

$

16,790

 

 

$

13,746

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption

 

 

3,364

 

 

 

2,855

 

 

 

2,795

 

 

 

2,634

 

 

 

2,610

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

$

19,317

 

 

$

15,815

 

 

$

17,176

 

 

$

19,424

 

 

$

16,356

 

Effective January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted ASC 842, Leases ("ASC 842"), which requires lessees to recognize leases with terms greater than 12 months on the balance sheet as lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities.  Adoption of the new standard reduces the comparability of the Summary Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition from 2019 to the other years presented within the summary above. See Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes 1 and 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

26

28


PART II

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations, and the financial condition and the cash flows of the Partnership. Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes included in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For discussions surrounding the earliest of the three years presented below, refer to Part II, Item 7 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. All amounts are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

Basis of Presentation

The Partnership broadly categorizes its net revenues into four categories: fee revenue, trade revenue, net interest and dividends revenue (net of interest expense) and other revenue.revenue (loss), net. In the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income, fee revenue is composed of asset-based fees and account and activity fees. Asset-based fees include program fees which are generally a percentage ofbased on the totalaverage daily market value of specificclient assets in client accounts.the program, as well as contractual rates. These fees are impacted by changes in market values of the assets and by client dollars invested in and divested from the accounts which generate asset-based fees and change in market values of the assets.accounts. Account and activity fees and other revenue are impacted by the number of client accounts and the variety of services provided to those accounts, among other factors. Trade revenue is composed of commissions and principal transactions revenue. Commissions are earned from the purchase or saledistribution of mutual fund shares and equities as well asinsurance products and the purchase or sale of insurance products.securities. Principal transactions revenue primarily results from the Partnership's distribution of and participation in principal trading activities in municipal obligations, over-the-counter corporate obligations, and certificates of deposit.deposit and corporate obligations. Trade revenue is impacted by the number of financial advisors, trading volume (client dollars invested), mix of the products in which clients invest and the size of trades, all of which may be impacted by market volatility, and margins earned on the transactions and market volatility.transactions. Net interest and dividends revenue is impacted by the amount of cash and investments, receivables from and payables to clients, the variability of interest rates earned and paid on such balances, the number of Interests outstanding, and the balances of Partnership loans. Other revenue (loss), net, primarily consists of unrealized gains and losses associated with changes in the fair market value of investment securities, resulting from changes in market levels and the interest rate environment.

27

29


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

OVERVIEW

The following table sets forth the change in major categories of the Consolidated Statements of Income as well as several key related metrics for the last three years. Management of the Partnership relies on this financial information and the related metrics to evaluate the Partnership’s operating performance and financial condition.

 

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

'22 vs. '21

 

 

'21 vs. '20

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fee revenue:

 

$

10,500

 

 

$

10,424

 

 

$

8,175

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

28

%

% of net revenue

 

 

86

%

 

 

85

%

 

 

81

%

 

 

1

%

 

 

5

%

Trade revenue

 

 

1,484

 

 

 

1,719

 

 

 

1,719

 

 

 

-14

%

 

 

 

% of net revenue

 

 

12

%

 

 

14

%

 

 

17

%

 

 

-14

%

 

 

-18

%

Interest and dividends

 

 

514

 

 

 

167

 

 

 

207

 

 

 

208

%

 

 

-19

%

Other (loss) revenue, net

 

 

(87

)

 

 

63

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

-238

%

 

 

-2

%

Total revenue

 

 

12,411

 

 

 

12,373

 

 

 

10,165

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

%

Interest expense

 

 

142

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

51

%

 

 

-8

%

Net revenue

 

 

12,269

 

 

 

12,279

 

 

 

10,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

%

Operating expenses

 

 

10,865

 

 

 

10,674

 

 

 

8,778

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

22

%

Income before allocations to partners

 

$

1,404

 

 

$

1,605

 

 

$

1,285

 

 

 

-13

%

 

 

25

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related metrics:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before allocations to partners margin(1)

 

 

11.3

%

 

 

13.0

%

 

 

12.6

%

 

 

-13

%

 

 

3

%

Client assets under care:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end ($ billions)

 

$

1,639

 

 

$

1,822

 

 

$

1,546

 

 

 

-10

%

 

 

18

%

Average ($ billions)

 

$

1,664

 

 

$

1,693

 

 

$

1,354

 

 

 

-2

%

 

 

25

%

Advisory programs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end ($ billions)

 

$

621

 

 

$

702

 

 

$

560

 

 

 

-12

%

 

 

25

%

Average ($ billions)

 

$

640

 

 

$

637

 

 

$

471

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

%

Client dollars invested(2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade ($ billions)

 

$

169

 

 

$

106

 

 

$

114

 

 

 

60

%

 

 

-7

%

Advisory programs ($ billions)

 

$

36

 

 

$

74

 

 

$

41

 

 

 

-51

%

 

 

80

%

Client households at year end

 

 

6.2

 

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

5.7

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

4

%

Net new households for the period (actual)(3)

 

 

236,086

 

 

 

283,267

 

 

 

203,283

 

 

 

-17

%

 

 

39

%

Net new assets for the year ($ billions)(4)

 

$

102

 

 

$

93

 

 

$

66

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

41

%

Financial advisors (actual):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

18,796

 

 

 

18,823

 

 

 

19,225

 

 

 

 

 

 

-2

%

Average

 

 

18,772

 

 

 

18,929

 

 

 

19,116

 

 

 

-1

%

 

 

-1

%

Attrition %(5)

 

 

5.8

%

 

 

6.6

%

 

 

6.7

%

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

Dow Jones Industrial Average (actual):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

33,147

 

 

 

36,338

 

 

 

30,606

 

 

 

-9

%

 

 

19

%

Average for year

 

 

32,911

 

 

 

34,042

 

 

 

26,897

 

 

 

-3

%

 

 

27

%

S&P 500 Index (actual):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

3,840

 

 

 

4,766

 

 

 

3,756

 

 

 

-19

%

 

 

27

%

Average for year

 

 

4,101

 

 

 

4,271

 

 

 

3,218

 

 

 

-4

%

 

 

33

%

Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index (actual)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

97

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

-15

%

 

 

-3

%

Average for year

 

 

103

 

 

 

115

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

-10

%

 

 

-2

%

 

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2019 vs. 2018

 

 

2018 vs. 2017

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based

 

$

6,778

 

 

$

6,075

 

 

$

5,047

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

20

%

Account and activity

 

 

674

 

 

 

678

 

 

 

678

 

 

 

-1

%

 

 

 

Total fee revenue

 

 

7,452

 

 

 

6,753

 

 

 

5,725

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

18

%

% of net revenue

 

 

80

%

 

 

80

%

 

 

76

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade revenue

 

 

1,581

 

 

 

1,462

 

 

 

1,547

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

-5

%

% of net revenue

 

 

17

%

 

 

17

%

 

 

21

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest and dividends

 

 

259

 

 

 

237

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

36

%

Other revenue

 

 

77

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

353

%

 

 

-72

%

Net revenue

 

 

9,369

 

 

 

8,469

 

 

 

7,506

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

13

%

Operating expenses

 

 

8,277

 

 

 

7,479

 

 

 

6,634

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

13

%

Income before allocations to partners

 

$

1,092

 

 

$

990

 

 

$

872

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

14

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related metrics:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Client dollars invested(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade ($ billions)

 

$

118

 

 

$

112

 

 

$

88

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

27

%

Advisory programs ($ billions)

 

$

31

 

 

$

41

 

 

$

75

 

 

 

-24

%

 

 

-45

%

Client households at year end

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

2

%

Net new assets for the year ($ billions)(2)

 

$

64

 

 

$

65

 

 

$

49

 

 

 

-2

%

 

 

33

%

Client assets under care:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end ($ billions)

 

$

1,349

 

 

$

1,103

 

 

$

1,121

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

-2

%

Average ($ billions)

 

$

1,238

 

 

$

1,144

 

 

$

1,041

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

10

%

Advisory programs(3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end ($ billions)

 

$

456

 

 

$

354

 

 

$

337

 

 

 

29

%

 

 

5

%

Average ($ billions)

 

$

408

 

 

$

361

 

 

$

273

 

 

 

13

%

 

 

32

%

Financial advisors (actual):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

18,704

 

 

 

17,615

 

 

 

16,095

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

9

%

Average

 

 

18,171

 

 

 

16,864

 

 

 

15,435

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

9

%

Attrition %(4)

 

 

8.8

%

 

 

7.4

%

 

 

7.2

%

 

n/a

 

 

n/a

 

Dow Jones Industrial Average (actual):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

28,538

 

 

 

23,327

 

 

 

24,719

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

-6

%

Average for year

 

 

26,367

 

 

 

25,054

 

 

 

21,742

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

15

%

S&P 500 Index (actual):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

3,231

 

 

 

2,507

 

 

 

2,674

 

 

 

29

%

 

 

-6

%

Average for year

 

 

2,912

 

 

 

2,746

 

 

 

2,448

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

12

%

(1)
Income before allocations to partners margin is income before allocations to partners expressed as a percentage of total revenue.
(2)
Client dollars invested for trade revenue represents the principal amount of clients’ buy and sell transactions resulting in revenue and for advisory programs revenue represents the net of the inflows and outflows of client dollars into advisory programs.
(3)
Net new households represents new client households less client households closed during the period.
(4)
Net new assets represents cash and securities inflows and outflows, excluding mutual fund capital gain distributions received by U.S. clients.
(5)
Attrition % represents the number of financial advisors that left the firm during the year compared to the total number of financial advisors as of year end.

(1)

Client dollars invested for trade revenue represents the principal amount of clients’ buy and sell transactions resulting in revenue and for advisory programs revenue represents the net of the inflows and outflows of client dollars into advisory programs.

(2)

Net new assets represents cash and securities inflows and outflows from new and existing clients and excludes mutual fund capital gain distributions received by U.S. clients.

(3)

Prior year assets under care were reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

(4)

Attrition % represents the number of financial advisors that left the firm during the year compared to the total number of financial advisors as of year end.

28

30


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

2019 versus 2018 OverviewEven with increased market volatility, economic uncertainty and the rising interest rate environment, the Partnership ended 2022 with record net new assets of $102 billion. This was a 10% increase compared to 2021, reflecting growth in asset inflows and higher average asset sizes for new households, although net new households decreased 17% with fewer households added. The Partnership has continued executing its strategy to grow and promote branch team success during 2022, ending the year with 18,796 financial advisors in two thirds of U.S. counties and all Canadian provinces.

The Partnership ended 2019the year with 18,704 financial advisors, an increase of 1,089 compared to 2018, and $1.3$1.6 trillion of client assets under care,AUC, a $246 billion increase10% decrease from 2018.2021, reflecting declines in market levels. Average client assets under care increased 8% during 2019AUC decreased 2% in 2022 due to increases in thelower average market value of client assets and $64 billion inlevels, partially offset by record net new assets gathered during the year.  

assets. Advisory programs' average assets under careAUC slightly increased 13% in 20192022 to $408$640 billion due to the continued, though lower, investment of client assets in advisory programs and higher average market levels in 2019 compared to 2018.

Net revenue increased 11% to $9,369 in 2019 compared to 2018.  Results reflected a 12% increase in asset-based fee revenue primarilyat year end due to the cumulative impact of net asset inflows into advisory programs in both 2018 and 2019, as well as market increases. The increase in net revenue also reflected 8% growth in trade revenue primarily due to additional financial advisors serving clients and increased client dollars invested in 2019 comparedadvisory programs, offset by lower average market levels.

Net revenue slightly decreased to 2018, as well as$12,269 due to decreases in trade revenue and other revenue, partially offset by increases in net interest and dividends revenue and fee revenue. Trade revenue decreased due to a $60 increasedecrease in other revenue.overall margin earned and a decrease in client dollars invested in mutual funds. The increasedecrease in other revenue was primarily driven bydue to a decline in market levels in 2022, resulting in unrealized losses from the unrealized gain on the increasedecrease in the value of the mutual fund investment securities held to economically hedge future liabilities related tofor the non-qualified deferred compensation plan, which is discussedplan. Those unrealized losses were offset by the corresponding decreased liability recognized in more detailfinancial advisor compensation expense. Other revenue also decreased due to unrealized losses on U.S. Treasury securities held, resulting from rising interest rates. The increases in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statementsnet interest and Supplementary Data – Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.dividends revenue and cash solutions revenue included within other asset-based fees reflected rising interest rates.

Operating expenses increased 11%2% to $8,277 in 2019 compared to 2018,$10,865 primarily due to an increaseincreases in home office and branch compensation and benefits expense.  Financialand communications and data processing expenses. The Partnership's intentional investments in human capital, technology infrastructure, digital initiatives, virtual enablement tools, and test and learn pilot programs to support its long-term growth objectives have increased home office and branch compensation and benefits and communications and data processing expenses. The increase in operating expenses was partially offset by a decrease in variable compensation due to lower firm profitability and decreased financial advisor compensation increased largelyprimarily due to an increasethe decrease in revenues on which commissions are earned, an increase in the number of financial advisors, and an increase in compensation related to supporting new financial advisors and trainees.  Home office and branch compensation increased due to an increase in the number of personnel to support increased client activity, firm initiatives to enhance the client experience, and growth of the Partnership’s financial advisor network, as well as higher wages.  earned.

Overall, the increaseslight decrease in net revenue offset byand the increase in operating expenses increasedgenerated income before allocations to partners 10%of $1,404, a 13% decrease from 20182021. Income before allocations to $1.1 billion, exceeding $1 billion forpartners margin was 11.3%, reflecting the first time.Partnership's strategic balance between investing in the future and current financial results.

2931


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 AND 20172020

The discussion below details the significant fluctuations and their drivers for each of the major categories of the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fee Revenue

Fee revenue, which consists of asset-based fees and account and activity fees, increased 10%1% in 20192022 to $7,452.$10,500 compared to 2021. A discussion of fee revenue components follows.

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

'22 vs. '21

 

 

'21 vs. '20

 

Fee Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory programs fees

 

$

7,384

 

 

$

7,421

 

 

$

5,537

 

 

 

 

 

 

34

%

Service fees

 

 

1,512

 

 

 

1,676

 

 

 

1,387

 

 

 

-10

%

 

 

21

%

Other asset-based fees

 

 

912

 

 

 

640

 

 

 

591

 

 

 

43

%

 

 

8

%

Total asset-based fee revenue

 

$

9,808

 

 

$

9,737

 

 

$

7,515

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

30

%

Account and activity fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder accounting service fees

 

 

454

 

 

 

436

 

 

 

424

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

3

%

Other account and activity fees

 

 

238

 

 

 

251

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

-5

%

 

 

6

%

Total account and activity fee revenue

 

 

692

 

 

 

687

 

 

 

660

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

4

%

Total fee revenue

 

$

10,500

 

 

$

10,424

 

 

$

8,175

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

28

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related metrics:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average U.S. client asset values ($ billions)(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory programs

 

$

627.5

 

 

$

625.7

 

 

$

463.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

%

Mutual fund assets held outside of advisory
   programs

 

$

534.1

 

 

$

576.0

 

 

$

467.6

 

 

 

-7

%

 

 

23

%

Insurance

 

$

80.3

 

 

$

89.3

 

 

$

77.2

 

 

 

-10

%

 

 

16

%

Cash solutions

 

$

51.3

 

 

$

49.6

 

 

$

40.1

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

24

%

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2019 vs. 2018

 

 

2018 vs. 2017

 

Fee Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory programs fees

 

$

4,810

 

 

$

4,214

 

 

$

3,341

 

 

 

14

%

 

 

26

%

Service fees

 

 

1,329

 

 

 

1,305

 

 

 

1,259

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

4

%

Other asset-based fees

 

 

639

 

 

 

556

 

 

 

447

 

 

 

15

%

 

 

24

%

Total asset-based fee revenue

 

$

6,778

 

 

$

6,075

 

 

$

5,047

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

20

%

Account and activity fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder accounting service fees

 

 

432

 

 

 

432

 

 

 

412

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

%

Other account and activity fees

 

 

242

 

 

 

246

 

 

 

266

 

 

 

-2

%

 

 

-8

%

Total account and activity fee revenue

 

 

674

 

 

 

678

 

 

 

678

 

 

 

-1

%

 

 

 

Total fee revenue

 

$

7,452

 

 

$

6,753

 

 

$

5,725

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related metrics:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average U.S. client asset values ($ billions)(1,2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mutual fund assets held outside of advisory

   programs

 

$

424.7

 

 

$

404.9

 

 

$

415.2

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

-2

%

Advisory programs

 

 

402.2

 

 

 

356.7

 

 

 

269.7

 

 

 

13

%

 

 

32

%

Insurance

 

 

74.8

 

 

 

74.6

 

 

 

74.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash solutions

 

 

33.1

 

 

 

27.4

 

 

 

24.4

 

 

 

21

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder accounting holdings serviced

 

 

29.1

 

 

 

27.8

 

 

 

26.6

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

5

%

(1)
Assets on which the Partnership earns asset-based fee revenue. The U.S. portion of consolidated asset-based fee revenue was 97% for 2022 and 98% for 2021 and 2020.

(1)

Assets on which the Partnership earns asset-based fee revenue. The U.S. portion of consolidated asset-based fee revenue was 98% for each of the periods presented.

(2)

Prior year asset values were reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

2019 vs. 2018

Overall asset-based fee revenue increased 12%1% to $6,778$9,808 in 2019, reflecting an increase in advisory program fees due2022 compared to the continued, though lower, investment of client assets in advisory programs and higher average market levels in 2019 compared 2018.  The increase in other asset-based fee revenue in 2019 reflected growth in cash solutions revenue2021, primarily due to an increase in revenue from other asset-based fees, mostly offset by a decrease in revenues from service fees and advisory program fees. Due to rising interest rates, other asset-based fee revenue increased primarily due to higher interest earned on client assets invested in cash solutions assets and growth in fund adviserlower fee waivers to maintain a positive client yield on the Money Market Fund. Service fees revenue decreased due to an increasethe decrease in the average value of mutual fund assets held outside of advisory programs resulting from lower average market levels. Advisory programs revenue decreased due to the decrease in the mutual funds comprising the BB Trust.  However, this fund adviser fee revenue was completelyaverage value of advisory program assets resulting from lower average market levels, partially offset by fees paid to the sub-adviserscumulative impact of the funds comprising the BB Trust.client dollars invested.

30

32


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

Trade Revenue

Trade revenue, which consists of commissions and principal transactions, increased 8%decreased 14% to $1,581 during 2019.$1,484 in 2022 compared to 2021. A discussion of trade revenue components follows.

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

% Change

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2019 vs. 2018

 

 

2018 vs. 2017

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

'22 vs. '21

 

 

'21 vs. '20

 

Trade revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 

$

571

 

 

 

 

$

603

 

 

 

 

$

681

 

 

 

 

 

-5

%

 

 

-11

%

Mutual funds

 

$

675

 

 

$

535

 

 

$

673

 

 

 

26

%

 

 

-21

%

 

 

483

 

 

 

 

 

777

 

 

 

 

 

711

 

 

 

 

 

-38

%

 

 

9

%

Equities

 

 

484

 

 

 

497

 

 

 

481

 

 

 

-3

%

 

 

3

%

Insurance products and other

 

 

316

 

 

 

288

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

14

%

 

 

264

 

 

 

 

 

299

 

 

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

 

 

-12

%

 

 

12

%

Total commissions revenue

 

 

1,475

 

 

 

1,320

 

 

 

1,407

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

-6

%

 

 

1,318

 

 

 

 

 

1,679

 

 

 

 

 

1,660

 

 

 

 

 

-22

%

 

 

1

%

Principal transactions

 

 

106

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

-25

%

 

 

1

%

 

 

166

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

 

315

%

 

 

-32

%

Total trade revenue

 

$

1,581

 

 

$

1,462

 

 

$

1,547

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

-5

%

 

$

1,484

 

 

 

 

$

1,719

 

 

 

 

$

1,719

 

 

 

 

 

-14

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related metrics:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Client dollars invested ($ billions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Client dollars invested ($ billions)(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 

$

39.7

 

 

 

23

%

$

42.1

 

 

 

40

%

$

46.0

 

 

 

40

%

 

-6

%

 

 

-8

%

Mutual funds

 

$

37

 

 

$

26

 

 

$

32

 

 

 

42

%

 

 

-19

%

 

 

28.7

 

 

 

17

%

 

47.7

 

 

 

45

%

 

41.1

 

 

 

36

%

 

-40

%

 

 

16

%

Equities

 

 

30

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

-6

%

 

 

7

%

Insurance products and other

 

 

6

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

%

 

 

7.9

 

 

 

5

%

 

6.9

 

 

 

7

%

 

6.4

 

 

 

6

%

 

14

%

 

 

8

%

Principal transactions

 

 

45

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

-6

%

 

 

129

%

 

 

92.4

 

 

 

55

%

 

9.2

 

 

 

8

%

 

21.0

 

 

 

18

%

 

904

%

 

 

-56

%

Total client dollars invested ($ billions)

 

$

118

 

 

$

112

 

 

$

88

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

27

%

Total client dollars invested

 

$

168.7

 

 

 

100

%

$

105.9

 

 

 

100

%

$

114.5

 

 

 

100

%

 

59

%

 

 

-8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Margin per $1,000 invested

 

$

13.4

 

 

$

13.1

 

 

$

17.7

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

-26

%

 

$

8.8

 

 

 

 

$

16.2

 

 

 

 

$

15.0

 

 

 

 

 

-46

%

 

 

8

%

U.S. business days

 

 

252

 

 

 

251

 

 

 

251

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

251

 

 

 

 

 

252

 

 

 

 

 

253

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Percentages represent client dollars invested in each product as a percent of total client dollars invested.

(1) Percentages represent client dollars invested in each product as a percent of total client dollars invested.

 

2019 vs. 2018

The increasedecrease in trade revenue in 2022 compared to 2021 was due to an increase in commissions revenue, partially offset by a decrease in principal transactions revenue. Commissions revenue increased primarily due to additional financial advisors serving clients and an increase in client dollars invested, largely in mutual funds which earn higher margins relative to other products. Market changes to fee structures in the mutual funds industry have resulted in decreased marginscommissions revenue and overall margin earned, on mutual funds compared to previous periods, which has resulted in lower revenue growth.

Principal transactions revenue decreased as a result of a decrease in client dollars invested and lower margins earned on fixed income products within principal transactions revenue, due in part to the decline in interest rates on those products during 2019.

Net Interest and Dividends

Net interest and dividends revenue increased 9% to $259 during 2019. An overall higher federal funds rate throughout the majority of 2019 resulted in an increase in short-term investing interest revenue.  This increase was partially offset by an increase in limited partnership capitalprincipal transactions revenue. Mutual funds commissions revenue decreased due to the decrease in client dollars invested in mutual funds. Overall margin decreased due to a change in product mix with a higher portion of client dollars invested in principal transaction products, primarily certificates of deposit, that earn lower margins than other products. The shift in product mix and increase in principal transactions revenue was due to a significant increase in client dollars invested in fixed income products during the higher interest rate environment in 2022.

Net Interest and Dividends

Net interest and dividends revenue increased $299 to $372 in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to increases in interest income earned on short-term investments and client margin loans, reflecting higher interest rates and increased balances. The average balances of short-term investments increased 5% and client margin loans increased 18% in 2022 compared to 2021. The increases in interest and dividends revenue were partially offset by increases in customer credit interest expense, for 2019 compared to 2018.reflecting rising interest rates.

3133


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses increased 11%2% in 20192022 to $8,277,$10,865 compared to 2021, primarily due to an increaseincreases in home office and branch compensation and benefits expense.and communications and data processing, partially offset by decreases in financial advisor and variable compensation. A discussion of operating expense components follows.

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

'22 vs. '21

 

 

'21 vs. '20

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation and benefits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial advisor

 

$

4,813

 

 

$

5,003

 

 

$

4,169

 

 

 

-4

%

 

 

20

%

Home office and branch

 

 

2,020

 

 

 

1,768

 

 

 

1,603

 

 

 

14

%

 

 

10

%

Variable compensation

 

 

1,735

 

 

 

1,949

 

 

 

1,414

 

 

 

-11

%

 

 

38

%

Total compensation and benefits

 

 

8,568

 

 

 

8,720

 

 

 

7,186

 

 

 

-2

%

 

 

21

%

Communications and data processing

 

 

687

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

413

 

 

 

42

%

 

 

17

%

Occupancy and equipment

 

 

582

 

 

 

547

 

 

 

522

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

5

%

Fund sub-adviser fees

 

 

250

 

 

 

245

 

 

 

187

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

31

%

Professional and consulting fees

 

 

182

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

21

%

 

 

39

%

Other operating expenses

 

 

596

 

 

 

526

 

 

 

361

 

 

 

13

%

 

 

46

%

Total operating expenses

 

$

10,865

 

 

$

10,674

 

 

$

8,778

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

22

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related metrics (actual):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of branches:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

15,769

 

 

 

15,525

 

 

 

15,361

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

1

%

Average

 

 

15,639

 

 

 

15,418

 

 

 

15,307

 

 

 

1

%

 

 

1

%

Financial advisors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

18,796

 

 

 

18,823

 

 

 

19,225

 

 

 

 

 

 

-2

%

Average

 

 

18,772

 

 

 

18,929

 

 

 

19,116

 

 

 

-1

%

 

 

-1

%

Branch support team members(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

17,920

 

 

 

17,515

 

 

 

16,723

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

5

%

Average

 

 

17,790

 

 

 

17,215

 

 

 

16,799

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

2

%

Home office associates(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

8,865

 

 

 

7,499

 

 

 

6,954

 

 

 

18

%

 

 

8

%

Average

 

 

8,118

 

 

 

7,223

 

 

 

7,001

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

3

%

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2019 vs. 2018

 

 

2018 vs. 2017

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation and benefits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial advisor

 

$

3,874

 

 

$

3,558

 

 

$

3,158

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

13

%

Home office and branch

 

 

1,546

 

 

 

1,437

 

 

 

1,328

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

8

%

Variable compensation

 

 

1,118

 

 

 

998

 

 

 

813

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

23

%

Total compensation and benefits

 

 

6,538

 

 

 

5,993

 

 

 

5,299

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

13

%

Occupancy and equipment

 

 

499

 

 

 

448

 

 

 

416

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

8

%

Communications and data processing

 

 

392

 

 

 

338

 

 

 

324

 

 

 

16

%

 

 

4

%

Fund sub-adviser fees

 

 

159

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

20

%

 

 

33

%

Professional and consulting fees

 

 

113

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

30

%

 

 

28

%

Advertising

 

 

96

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

86

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

7

%

Postage and shipping

 

 

56

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

-14

%

Other operating expenses

 

 

424

 

 

 

334

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

27

%

 

 

20

%

Total operating expenses

 

$

8,277

 

 

$

7,479

 

 

$

6,634

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

13

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related metrics (actual):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of branches:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

15,044

 

 

 

14,172

 

 

 

13,449

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

5

%

Average

 

 

14,636

 

 

 

13,828

 

 

 

13,174

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

5

%

Financial advisors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

18,704

 

 

 

17,615

 

 

 

16,095

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

9

%

Average

 

 

18,171

 

 

 

16,864

 

 

 

15,435

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

9

%

Branch office administrators(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

16,958

 

 

 

16,221

 

 

 

15,440

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

5

%

Average

 

 

16,670

 

 

 

15,867

 

 

 

15,234

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

4

%

Home office associates(1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

7,049

 

 

 

6,830

 

 

 

6,559

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

4

%

Average

 

 

6,979

 

 

 

6,733

 

 

 

6,504

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

4

%

Home office associates(1) per 100

   financial advisors (average)

 

 

38.4

 

 

 

39.9

 

 

 

42.1

 

 

 

-4

%

 

 

-5

%

Branch office administrators(1) per 100

   financial advisors (average)

 

 

91.7

 

 

 

94.1

 

 

 

98.7

 

 

 

-2

%

 

 

-5

%

Operating expenses per

   financial advisor (average)(2)

 

$

172,032

 

 

$

165,500

 

 

$

166,116

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

 

(1)
Counted on a full-time equivalent basis.

(1)

Counted on a full-time equivalent basis.

(2)

Operating expenses used in calculation represent total operating expenses less financial advisor compensation, variable compensation and fund sub-adviser fees.

32


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

2019 vs. 2018

The increase in operating expenses for 2019 was primarily due to a 9% increase in compensation and benefits expense, described below, as well as a 16% increase in communications and data processing expense and an 11% increase in occupancy and equipment expense primarily due to growth in the number of branches. The increase in 2019 was also a result of a $90 increase in other operating expenses due to various items, including expenses related to branch business expenses, recruiting, and legal.

Financial advisor compensation and benefits expense increased 9%decreased 4% to $4,813 in 20192022. The decrease in 2022 was primarily due to an increasethe decrease in revenues on which commissions are earned, growth in the numberas well as decreased future liabilities as a result of financial advisors and an increase in compensationcorresponding unrealized losses related to supporting new financial advisors and trainees.the economic hedge for the non-qualified deferred compensation plan, partially offset by increases in travel incentive program costs.

Home office and branch compensation and benefits expense increased 8%14% to $2,020 in 2019,2022 primarily due to an increase in the number of personnelassociates to support increased client activity, firm initiatives to enhance the client experience,Partnership's long-term growth objectives and growth of the Partnership’s financial advisor network, as well as higher wages. The average number of the Partnership’s home office associates and BOAs both increased 4% and 5%, respectively, in 2019.wages.

Variable compensation expands and contracts in relation to the Partnership’s related profitability and margin earned. A significant portion of the Partnership’s profits is allocated to variable compensation and paid to associates in the form of bonuses and profit sharing. VariableThe decrease in variable compensation increased 12%of 11% to $1,735 in 2019 to $1,1182022 was due to an increasea decrease in the Partnership's profitability, including an increaseoverall profitability.

Communications and data processing expenses increased 42% to $687 in the number of profitable branches2022 due to intentional investments in technology infrastructure, digital initiatives, virtual enablement tools and an overall increase in branch profitability.test and learn pilot programs.

The Partnership uses the ratios of both the number of home office associates and the number of BOAs per 100 financial advisors, as well as

Other operating expenses per financial advisor (excluding financial advisor compensation, variable compensation and fund sub-adviser fees), as key metricsincreased 13% to $596 in managing its costs.  In 2019, the average number of home office associates and BOAs per 100 financial advisors decreased 4% and 2%, respectively. The operating expenses per financial advisor increased 4% in 20192022 primarily due to the increase in the number of personnel as well as the increases in home officecosts associated with resuming in-person meetings and branch compensationevents and benefitsadvertising.

34


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and other expenses described above, partially offset by the impactAnalysis of spreading those expenses over more financial advisors.  The Partnership’s longer term strategy is to continue to grow its financial advisor network at a faster pace than its home office staff.  The Partnership expects branch expenses to increase as new financial advisors obtain branch officesFinancial Condition and incur additional expenses.Results of Operations, continued

Segment Information

The Partnership has two operating and reportable segments based upon geographic location, the U.S. and Canada. Canada segment information, as reported in the following table, is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements of the Partnership’s Canada operations. The U.S. segment information is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements less the Canada segment information as presented. Pre-variable income represents income before variable compensation expense and before allocations to partners. This is consistent with how management views the segments to assess performance.


3335


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The following table shows financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments.

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

% Change

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2019 vs. 2018

 

 

2018 vs. 2017

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

'22 vs. '21

 

 

'21 vs. '20

 

Net revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

9,127

 

 

$

8,233

 

 

$

7,305

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

13

%

 

$

11,902

 

 

$

11,946

 

 

$

9,805

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

%

Canada

 

 

242

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

201

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

17

%

 

 

367

 

 

 

333

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

29

%

Total net revenue

 

 

9,369

 

 

 

8,469

 

 

 

7,506

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

13

%

 

 

12,269

 

 

 

12,279

 

 

 

10,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses (excluding variable

compensation):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

6,933

 

 

 

6,261

 

 

 

5,624

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

11

%

 

 

8,845

 

 

 

8,457

 

 

 

7,132

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

19

%

Canada

 

 

226

 

 

 

220

 

 

 

197

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

285

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

232

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

16

%

Total operating expenses

 

 

7,159

 

 

 

6,481

 

 

 

5,821

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

11

%

 

 

9,130

 

 

 

8,725

 

 

 

7,364

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-variable income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

2,194

 

 

 

1,972

 

 

 

1,681

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

17

%

 

 

3,057

 

 

 

3,489

 

 

 

2,673

 

 

 

-12

%

 

 

31

%

Canada

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

%

 

 

82

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

26

%

 

 

150

%

Total pre-variable income

 

 

2,210

 

 

 

1,988

 

 

 

1,685

 

 

 

11

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

3,139

 

 

 

3,554

 

 

 

2,699

 

 

 

-12

%

 

 

32

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

1,094

 

 

 

975

 

 

 

795

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

23

%

 

 

1,694

 

 

 

1,907

 

 

 

1,385

 

 

 

-11

%

 

 

38

%

Canada

 

 

24

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

28

%

 

 

41

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

-2

%

 

 

45

%

Total variable compensation

 

 

1,118

 

 

 

998

 

 

 

813

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

23

%

 

 

1,735

 

 

 

1,949

 

 

 

1,414

 

 

 

-11

%

 

 

38

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before allocations to partners:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

1,100

 

 

 

997

 

 

 

886

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

13

%

 

 

1,363

 

 

 

1,582

 

 

 

1,288

 

 

 

-14

%

 

 

23

%

Canada

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

-14

%

 

 

50

%

 

 

41

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

78

%

 

 

867

%

Total income before allocations to partners

 

$

1,092

 

 

$

990

 

 

$

872

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

14

%

 

$

1,404

 

 

$

1,605

 

 

$

1,285

 

 

 

-13

%

 

 

25

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Client assets under care ($ billions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

$

1,320.5

 

 

$

1,080.3

 

 

$

1,096.9

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

-2

%

 

$

1,603.3

 

 

$

1,782.2

 

 

$

1,514.0

 

 

 

-10

%

 

 

18

%

Average

 

$

1,212.3

 

 

$

1,120.0

 

 

$

1,018.3

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

10

%

 

$

1,627.4

 

 

$

1,657.5

 

 

$

1,326.2

 

 

 

-2

%

 

 

25

%

Canada

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

$

28.1

 

 

$

22.6

 

 

$

24.4

 

 

 

24

%

 

 

-7

%

 

$

35.3

 

 

$

39.3

 

 

$

32.0

 

 

 

-10

%

 

 

23

%

Average

 

$

25.8

 

 

$

24.2

 

 

$

22.2

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

9

%

 

$

36.7

 

 

$

35.9

 

 

$

27.7

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

30

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net new assets for the year ($ billions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

62.0

 

 

$

62.8

 

 

$

47.4

 

 

 

-1

%

 

 

32

%

 

$

98.6

 

 

$

89.5

 

 

$

64.1

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

40

%

Canada

 

$

1.7

 

 

$

1.8

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

 

-6

%

 

 

-10

%

 

$

2.9

 

 

$

3.6

 

 

$

2.0

 

 

 

-19

%

 

 

80

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial advisors (actual):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

17,830

 

 

 

16,797

 

 

 

15,347

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

9

%

 

 

17,961

 

 

 

17,971

 

 

 

18,321

 

 

 

 

 

 

-2

%

Average

 

 

17,328

 

 

 

16,078

 

 

 

14,742

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

9

%

 

 

17,927

 

 

 

18,053

 

 

 

18,211

 

 

 

-1

%

 

 

-1

%

Canada

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At year end

 

 

874

 

 

 

818

 

 

 

748

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

9

%

 

 

835

 

 

 

852

 

 

 

904

 

 

 

-2

%

 

 

-6

%

Average

 

 

843

 

 

 

786

 

 

 

693

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

13

%

 

 

845

 

 

 

876

 

 

 

905

 

 

 

-4

%

 

 

-3

%

3436


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

U.S.

2019 vs. 2018

Net revenue slightly decreased to $11,902 in 2022 compared to 2021, due to decreases in trade revenue and other revenue, partially offset by increases in net interest and dividends revenue and fee revenue. Trade revenue decreased due to a decrease in overall margin earned and a decrease in client dollars invested in mutual funds. The decrease in other revenue was due to a decline in market levels in 2022, resulting in unrealized losses from the decrease in the value of the mutual fund investment securities held to economically hedge future liabilities for the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Other revenue also decreased due to unrealized losses on U.S. Treasury securities held, resulting from rising interest rates. Asset-based fee revenue increased 11%1% to $9,127 in 2019,$9,554 primarily due to an increase in cash solutions revenue. The increases in cash solutions revenue and interest and dividends revenue resulted from rising interest rates in 2022.

Operating expenses (excluding variable compensation) increased 5% to $8,845 in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to increases in home office and branch compensation and benefits and communications and data processing expenses. Home office and branch compensation and benefits increased due to an increase in the number of associates to support the Partnership's long-term growth objectives and higher average wages. The increase in communications and data processing was due to intentional investments in technology infrastructure, digital initiatives, virtual enablement tools and test and learn pilot programs. The increases in operating expenses (excluding variable compensation) were partially offset by a decrease in financial advisor compensation expense. Financial advisor compensation expense decreased due to decreased revenues on which commissions are earned and decreased future liabilities in relation to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan referenced above.

Net income before allocations to partners decreased 14% to $1,363 in 2022 compared to 2021.

Canada

Net revenue increased 10% to $367 in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to increases in interest and dividends revenue and asset-based fee revenue. The increase in interest and dividends revenue resulted from rising interest rates in 2022. Asset-based fee revenue increased 12%5% to $6,620 in 2019$254, led by an increase in revenue from advisory programs fees largelyprimarily due to higher average AUC and the cumulative impact of net asset inflows into advisory programs, as well as higherpartially offset by lower average market levels in 2019 compared to 2018.  The increase in net revenue also reflected growth in trade revenue of 9% to $1,530 in 2019 due to an increase in client dollars invested compared to 2018.levels.

Operating expenses (excluding variable compensation) increased 11%6% to $6,933$285 in 2019,2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to an increaseincreases in other operating expenses and financial advisor compensation expense in 2022. Other operating expenses increased primarily due to increases in management fees, advertising and benefits expense for financial advisors and home office and branch associates.taxes. Financial advisor compensation and benefits expense increased primarilylargely due to an increase in revenues on which commissions are earned, growthearned.

Net income before allocations to partners increased 78% to $41 in the number of financial advisors and an increase in compensation related to supporting new financial advisors and trainees. Home office and branch compensation and benefits expense increased primarily due to an increase in the number of personnel to support increased client activity, firm initiatives to enhance the client experience, and growth of the Partnership’s financial advisor network, as well as higher wages.

Canada

2019 vs. 2018

Net revenue increased 3% to $242 in 2019, primarily due to an increase in asset-based fee revenue.  Asset-based fee revenue increased 9% to $158 in 2019, led by an increase in advisory programs fees largely due to the cumulative impact of net asset inflows into advisory programs, as well as higher average market levels in 20192022 compared to 2018.2021.

Operating expenses (excluding variable compensation) increased 3% to $226 in 2019 due to an increase in financial advisor compensation attributable to growth in the number of financial advisors and an increase in compensation related to supporting new financial advisors and trainees.

LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY REFORM

As discussed more fully inSee Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors – Risk Related to the Partnership's Business – Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives, the Partnership continues to monitor severalfor a discussion of Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives including the SEC's recently finalized Regulation Best Interest and Form CRS Relationship Summary and accompanying guidance.

There is a high degree of uncertainty surrounding Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives.  Current Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives have resulted in an increasingly complex environment in whichthat the Partnership conducts its business.  As such, the Partnership cannot reliably predict when or if any of the proposed or potential Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will be enacted, when or if any enacted Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will be implemented, whether there will be any changesis continuing to enacted or proposed Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives or the impact that any Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will have on the Partnership.monitor.

SEC Rules and Guidance on the Standards of Conduct for Investment Professionals.  On June 5, 2019, the SEC adopted Regulation Best Interest, establishing a standard of care for broker-dealers that includes acting in the best interest of their brokerage clients when making a recommendation and addressing conflicts of interest.  On the same day, the SEC adopted the Form CRS Relationship Summary and accompanying rule requiring registered investment advisers and broker-dealers to deliver a brief relationship summary to their clients informing them of the types of client relationships offered, together with the applicable standards of care, and information on fees, costs, conflicts of interest, and legal and disciplinary history.  Regulation Best Interest and Form CRS and its rule became effective September 10, 2019, with a compliance date of June 30, 2020.  In addition, also on June 5, 2019, the SEC issued guidance clarifying the "fiduciary" standard of care applicable to investment advisers and advisory clients and guidance clarifying what broker-dealer activities are excluded from the definition of "investment adviser."

3537


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

Canadian Securities Administrators Amendments.  On October 3, 2019, the CSA finalized amendments (the "Client Focused Reforms") to National Instrument 31-103, "Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations."  The Client Focused Reforms, many of which are similar to the SEC's Rules and Guidance, make changes to the registrant conduct requirements applicable to the Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary.  The amendments will become effective over a two-year phased implementation, concluding December 31, 2021.

The Partnership is dedicating significant resources to interpret and address the Rules and Guidance, as well as the Client Focused Reforms, to identify any potential changes to be made by their respective compliance dates, and to assess the potential impact on the Partnership's business. The final implementation of these rules may have an adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition and results of operations.

Other Standard of Care Initiatives.  In addition, state legislators and other regulators are proposing, or have adopted, laws and rules to articulate their required standard of care, which may diverge from the SEC's Rules and Guidance.  The Partnership is dedicating significant resources to interpret and address these laws and rules as well.  The Partnership cannot reliably predict the ultimate form or impact of such rules and laws, but their enactment and implementation may have an adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.

MUTUAL FUNDS AND INSURANCE PRODUCTS

The Partnership estimates approximately 30%, 35%, and 40%25% of its total revenue was derived from sales and services related to mutual fund and insurance products in 2019, 20182022 and 2017, respectively, while mutual fund holdingsapproximately 30% in advisory accounts were approximately 40%, 35%2021 and 35% of the Partnership's total revenue in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.2020. In addition, the Partnership derived 14%11%, 14%12% and 16%13% of its total revenue in 2019, 2018for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively, from one mutual fund company. The revenue generated from this company primarily relates to business conducted with the Partnership’s U.S. segment.

Significant reductions in these revenues due to changes toin the mutual fundfunds industry affecting fee structures that result in decreased margins earned, regulatory reform or other changes to the Partnership’s relationship with mutual fund or insurance companies could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Partnership requires liquidity to cover its operating expenses, net capital requirements, capital expenditures, distributions to partners and redemptions of Partnership interests.interests, as well as to facilitate client transactions. The principal sources for meeting the Partnership’s liquidity requirements include existing liquiditycash and cash equivalents, securities purchased under agreements to resell, government and agency investment securities, partnership capital resources of the Partnership, discussed further below, and funds generated from operations.operations, all discussed further below. The Partnership believes that the liquidity provided byliquid nature of these sources provides flexibility for managing and financing the operating needs of the Partnership and will be sufficient to meet its capital and liquidity requirements for the next twelve months. Depending on conditions in the capital markets and other factors, the Partnership will, from time to time, consider the issuance of debt and additional Partnership capital, the proceeds of which could be used to meet growth needs or for other purposes.

Partnership Capital

The Partnership’s growth in capital has historically been the result of the sale of Interests to its associates and existing limited partners, the sale of subordinated limited partnership interests to its current or retiring general partners, and retention of a portion of general partner earnings.

The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January 12, 2018,December 8, 2021, to register $450$700 of Interests issuable pursuant to the 20182021 Plan. TheIn early 2023, the Partnership issued approximately $380 and $1$568 of Interests under the 2018 Plan on January 2, 2019 and January 2, 2020, respectively. The remaining $69 of Interests may be issued under the Plan at the discretion of the Managing Partner in the future.2021 Plan. Proceeds from the offering under the 20182021 Plan are expected to be used to meet growth needs or for working capital and general firm purposes and to ensure there is adequate general liquidity of the Partnership for future needs.other purposes. The issuance of Interests reduces the Partnership’s net interest income and profitability. The remaining $132 may be issued at the discretion of the Managing Partner in the future. In November 2022, the Partnership deregistered the remaining $60 of unsold Interests under its 2018 Plan.


36


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The Partnership’s capital subject to mandatory redemption atas of December 31, 2019,2022, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, was $2,957,$3,355, an increase of $450$120 from December 31, 2018.2021. This increase in the Partnership’sPartnership capital subject to mandatory redemption was primarily due to the retention of a portion of general partner earnings ($110) and147), additional capital contributions related to limited partner, subordinated limited partner and general partner interests ($380, $534, $58 and $163,$277, respectively), partially offset by the net increase in Partnership loans outstanding ($28) and redemption of limited partner, subordinated limited partner and general partner interests ($15, $3417, $21 and $179,$314, respectively) and the net increase in Partnership loans outstanding ($14). During each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017,2020, the Partnership retained 13.8% of income allocated to general partners.

Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, a partner’s capital is required to be redeemed by the Partnership in the event of the partner’spartner's death, or withdrawal from the Partnership, subject to compliance with ongoing regulatory capital requirements. In the event of a partner’s death, the Partnership generally redeems the partner’s capital within six months. The Partnership has restrictions in place which govern the withdrawal of capital. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, limited partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership are to be repaid their capital in three equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their withdrawal notice is received by the Managing Partner. The capital of general partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership is converted to subordinated limited partnership capital or, at the discretion of the Managing Partner, redeemed by the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners requesting withdrawal are repaid their capital in six equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their request for withdrawal of contributed capital is received by the Managing

38


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

Partner. The Partnership’s Managing Partner has discretion to waive or modify these withdrawal restrictions and to accelerate the return of capital.

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the Executive Committee)ELT) who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions. In limited circumstances, a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while he or shethey still hashave an outstanding Partnership loan. It is anticipated that, of the future general and subordinated limited partnership capital contributions (in each case, other than for Executive CommitteeELT members) requiring financing, the majority will be financed through Partnership loans. Loans made by the Partnership to such partners are generally for a period of one year but are expected to be renewed and bear interest at the interest rate defined ingreater of the loan documents.Prime Rate for the last business day of the prior fiscal month or 3.25% per annum. The Partnership recognizes interest income for the interest earned related to these loans. Partners borrowing from the Partnership will be required to repay such loans by applying the earnings received from the Partnership to such loans, net of amounts retained by the Partnership, amounts distributed for income taxes and 5% of earnings distributed to the partner. The Partnership has full recourse against any partner that defaults on loan obligations to the Partnership. The Partnership does not anticipate that partner loans will have an adverse impact on the Partnership’s short-term liquidity or capital resources.

Any partner may also choose to have individual banking arrangements for their Partnership capital contributions. Any bank financing of capital contributions is in the form of unsecured bank loan agreements and is between the individual and the bank. The Partnership does not guarantee these bank loans, nor can the partner pledge his or hertheir partnership interest as collateral for the bank loan. The Partnership performs certain administrative functions in connection with its limited partners who have elected to finance a portion of their Partnership capital contributions through individual unsecured bank loan agreements from banks with whom the Partnership has other banking relationships. For all limited partner capital contributions financed through such bank loan agreements, each agreement instructs the Partnership to apply the proceeds from the redemption of that individual’s capital account to the repayment of the limited partner's bank loan prior to any funds being released to the partner. In addition, the partner is required to apply Partnership earnings, net of any distributions to pay taxes, to service the interest and principal on the bank loan. Should a partner’s individual bank loan not be renewed upon maturity for any reason, the Partnership could experience increased requests for capital liquidations, which could adversely impact the Partnership’s liquidity. In addition, partners who finance all or a portion of their capital contributions with bank financing may be more likely to request the withdrawal of capital to meet bank financing requirements should the partners experience a period of reduced earnings. As a partnership, any withdrawals by general partners, subordinated limited partners or limited partners would reduce the Partnership’s available liquidity and capital.

Many of the same banks that provide financing to limited partners also provide financing to the Partnership. To the extent these banks increase credit available to the partners, financing available to the Partnership may be reduced.

37


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The Partnership, while not a party to any partner unsecured bank loan agreements, does facilitate making payments of allocated income to certain banks on behalf of the limited partner. The following table represents amounts related to Partnership loans as well as bank loans (for which the Partnership facilitates certain administrative functions). Partners may have arranged their own bank loans to finance their Partnership capital for which the Partnership does not facilitate certain administrative functions and therefore any such loans are not included in the table.

39


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

 

 

As of December 31, 2022

 

 

 

Limited Partnership Interests

 

 

Subordinated Limited Partnership Interests

 

 

General Partnership Interests

 

 

Total Partnership Capital

 

Total Partnership capital(1)

 

$

1,212

 

 

$

618

 

 

$

1,860

 

 

$

3,690

 

Partnership capital owned by partners with individual loans

 

$

67

 

 

$

 

 

$

886

 

 

$

953

 

Partnership capital owned by partners with individual loans
   as a percent of total Partnership capital

 

 

6

%

 

 

0

%

 

 

48

%

 

 

26

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individual loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individual bank loans

 

$

10

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

10

 

Individual Partnership loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

335

 

 

 

335

 

Total individual loans

 

$

10

 

 

$

 

 

$

335

 

 

$

345

 

Individual loans as a percent of total Partnership capital

 

 

1

%

 

 

0

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

9

%

Individual loans as a percent of respective Partnership
   capital owned by partners with loans

 

 

15

%

 

 

 

 

 

38

%

 

 

36

%

 

 

As of December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Limited Partnership Interests

 

 

Subordinated Limited Partnership Interests

 

 

General Partnership Interests

 

 

Total

Partnership

Capital

 

Total Partnership capital(1)

 

$

1,249

 

 

$

527

 

 

$

1,541

 

 

$

3,317

 

Partnership capital owned by partners with individual

   loans

 

$

526

 

 

$

6

 

 

$

843

 

 

$

1,375

 

Partnership capital owned by partners with individual

   loans as a percent of total Partnership capital

 

 

42

%

 

 

1

%

 

 

55

%

 

 

41

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individual loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individual bank loans

 

$

133

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

133

 

Individual Partnership loans

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

356

 

 

 

360

 

Total individual loans

 

$

133

 

 

$

4

 

 

$

356

 

 

$

493

 

Individual loans as a percent of total Partnership

   capital

 

 

11

%

 

 

1

%

 

 

23

%

 

 

15

%

Individual loans as a percent of respective Partnership

   capital owned by partners with loans

 

 

25

%

 

 

67

%

 

 

42

%

 

 

36

%

(1)
Total Partnership capital, as defined for this table, is before the reduction of Partnership loans and is net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals.

(1)

Total Partnership capital, as defined for this table, is before the reduction of Partnership loans and is net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals.

Historically, neither the amount of Partnership capital financed with individual loans as indicated in the table above, nor the amount of partner withdrawal requests, has had a significant impact on the Partnership’s liquidity or capital resources.

Lines of Credit

The following table shows the composition of the Partnership’s aggregate bank lines of credit in place as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018:2021:

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

2022 Credit Facility

 

$

500

 

 

$

 

2018 Credit Facility

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

Uncommitted secured credit facilities

 

 

390

 

 

 

390

 

Total bank lines of credit

 

$

890

 

 

$

890

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

2018 Credit Facility

 

$

500

 

 

$

500

 

Uncommitted secured credit facilities

 

 

290

 

 

 

290

 

Total bank lines of credit

 

$

790

 

 

$

790

 

In accordance withSeptember 2018, the terms of the Partnership'sPartnership entered into a $500 committed revolving line of credit (the "2018 Credit Facility"). In October 2022, the Partnership entered into in Septembera new $500 committed revolving line of credit (the "2022 Credit Facility"), which replaced the 2018 Credit Facility and has an October 2027 expiration date. In accordance with the terms of the 2022 Credit Facility, the Partnership is required to maintain a leverage ratio of no more than 35% and minimum Partnership capital, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals and Partnership loans, of at least $1,884.$2,809. In addition, Edward Jones is required to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of at least $1,344$1,435 and minimum regulatory net capital of at least 6% of aggregate debit items as calculated under the alternative method. The Partnership has the ability to draw on various types of loans. The associated interest rate depends on the type of loan, duration of the loan, whether the loan is secured or unsecured and the amount of leverage. Rates include the federal fundsContractual rates are based on an index rate plus the applicable rate, eurodollar rate plus the applicable rate, and the Alternative Base Rate plus the applicable rate.spread. The 20182022 Credit Facility is intended to provide short-term liquidity to the Partnership should the need arise. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership was in compliance with all covenants related to the 20182022 Credit Facility.

38


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

In addition, the Partnership has multiple uncommitted lines of credit, including $290 of uncommitted secured lines of credit totaling $390 that are subject to change at the discretion of the banks and a newbanks. The Partnership also has an additional uncommitted line of credit entered into in September 2019. Thewhere the amount available on the new line of credit and the associated collateral requirements are at the bank's discretion uponin the event of a borrowing. Based on credit market conditions and the uncommitted nature of these credit facilities, it is possible that these lines of credit could decrease or not be available in the future. Actual borrowing availabilitycapacity on the uncommitted secured lines is based on availability of client margin securities or firm-owned securities, which would serve as collateral on loans in the event the Partnership borrowed against these lines. In February 2020, the Partnership increased the $290 uncommitted lines

40


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of credit to $390 with $250 unsecured for up to three days after borrowing.Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

There were no amounts outstanding on the 2022 Credit Facility and the 2018 Credit Facility as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, or the uncommitted lines of credit as of December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.  In addition, the2022 and 2021. The Partnership did not have any draws against these lines of credit during the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, except for periodically testing draw procedures.

Cash Activity

As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership had $1,014$1,882 in cash and cash equivalents and $1,693$437 in securities purchased under agreements to resell, which generally have maturities of less than one week. This totaled $2,707$2,319 of Partnership liquidity as of December 31, 2019,2022, a 12%31% ($298) increase1,045) decrease from $2,409 at$3,364 as of December 31, 2018.2021. The Partnership also held $1,000 and $413 in government and agency obligations as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, primarily to help facilitate cash management and maintain firm liquidity. The Partnership had $10,387$17,827 and $8,241$20,179 in cash and investments segregated under federal regulations as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively, which was not available for general use. Changes in cash were primarily due to the timing of daily client cash activity in relation to the weekly segregation requirement.

Capital Expenditures

The Partnership estimates 2020 capital spending of approximately $175 for construction and facilities improvements at home office locations in St. Louis and various branch offices, as well as for technology upgrades.

Regulatory Requirements

As a result of its activities as a U.S. broker-dealer, Edward Jones is subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule and capital compliance rules of the FINRA Rule 4110. Under the alternative method permitted by the rules, Edward Jones must maintain minimum net capital as defined, equal to the greater of $0.25 or 2% of aggregate debit items arising from client transactions. The net capital rules also provide that Edward Jones’ partnership capital may not be withdrawn if the resulting net capital would be less than minimum requirements. Additionally, certain withdrawals of partnership capital require the approval of the SEC and FINRA to the extent they exceed defined levels, even though such withdrawals would not cause net capital to be less than minimum requirements.

The Partnership’sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is a registered broker-dealer regulated by IIROC.IIROC in 2022 and New SRO currently. Under the regulations prescribed by IIROC the Partnership'sas of December 31, 2022 and New SRO currently, EJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiarywas and is required to maintain minimum levels of risk-adjusted capital, which are dependent on the nature of the Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary'sEJ Canada's assets and operations.

39


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The following table shows the Partnership’s capital figures for itsthe U.S. and Canada broker-dealer subsidiaries as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018:2021:

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

% Change

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

% Change

 

U.S.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net capital

 

$

1,244

 

 

$

1,280

 

 

 

-3

%

 

$

1,038

 

 

$

1,421

 

 

 

-27

%

Net capital in excess of the minimum required

 

$

1,188

 

 

$

1,221

 

 

 

-3

%

 

$

965

 

 

$

1,352

 

 

 

-29

%

Net capital as a percentage of aggregate debit

items

 

 

44.2

%

 

 

43.6

%

 

 

1

%

 

 

28.4

%

 

 

41.3

%

 

 

-31

%

Net capital after anticipated capital withdrawals, as

a percentage of aggregate debit items

 

 

26.4

%

 

 

28.3

%

 

 

-7

%

 

 

13.3

%

 

 

20.7

%

 

 

-36

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regulatory risk-adjusted capital

 

$

40

 

 

$

40

 

 

 

 

 

$

103

 

 

$

71

 

 

 

45

%

Regulatory risk-adjusted capital in excess of the

minimum required to be held by IIROC

 

$

38

 

 

$

39

 

 

 

-3

%

Regulatory risk-adjusted capital in excess of the
minimum required

 

$

102

 

 

$

50

 

 

 

104

%

U.S. net capital, Canada regulatory risk-adjusted capital and the related capital percentages may fluctuate on a daily basis.  In addition, Trust Co. was in compliance with its regulatory capital requirements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTSMATERIAL CASH COMMITMENTS

The Partnership does not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements.

CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS

The following table summarizes the Partnership’s portionenters into long-term lease agreements for branch and home office facilities, resulting in a total of long-term rental$359 in lease commitments that are non-cancellable as of December 31, 2019.2022. Subsequent to December 31, 2019,2022, these commitments may fluctuate based on changing business needs and conditions. For further disclosure regarding rentallease commitments, see Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 2 to the Consolidated2.

41


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Statements.Condition and Results of Operations, continued

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

Rental commitments

 

$

205

 

 

$

68

 

 

$

40

 

 

$

21

 

 

$

10

 

 

$

11

 

 

$

355

 

In addition to the above table,2022, the Partnership hadinvested significantly in software and other technology upgrades, construction and facilities improvements, resulting in capital expenditures of $302. The Partnership estimates 2023 capital spending of approximately $320 related to continued investment in software and other technology upgrades and construction and facilities improvements at various branch and home office locations.

Additionally, the 2018 Credit Facility outstandingPartnership would have incurred termination fees of $426 as of December 31, 2019 (see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  Additionally, the Partnership would incur termination fees of approximately $114 at December 31, 20192022 in the event the Partnership terminated existing contractual commitments with certain vendors providing ongoing services primarily for information technology to support the Partnership's strategic initiatives, in addition to services for operations and marketing. As of December 31, 2022, the Partnership made no such decision to terminate these services. These termination fees will decrease over the related contract periods, which generally expire within the next three years.

The Partnership expects to utilize existing cash and cash earned from operations to meet the obligations disclosed above.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIESESTIMATES

The Partnership’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require judgment and involve estimation processes to determine its assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses which affect its results of operations.

The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following critical policyestimate requires estimates that involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

40


PART II

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

Accruals for Contingencies. The Partnership accrues when appropriate for potential losses that may arise out of various legal and regulatory matters, including arbitrations, class actions, other litigation, and examinations, investigations and proceedings by governmental authorities, SROs and other regulators, to the extent that the amount of such potential losses can be estimated, in accordance with FASB ASCFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") No. 450, Contingencies. See Note 14 to the ConsolidatedPart II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Part I, Item 3Supplementary DataLegal ProceedingsNote 14 for further discussion of these items. The Partnership regularly monitors its exposures to potential losses. The Partnership’s totalaggregate accrued liability with respect to litigation and regulatory proceedings represents its estimate of probable losses, as determined under FASB ASC No. 450, Contingencies,, after considering, among other factors, whether a putative class action exists, the progress of each case, court rulings or judgments, the Partnership’s experience with other legal and regulatory matters, the perceived likelihood of settlement, outcomes of similar public cases and discussions with legal counsel. Facts and circumstances relating to legal and regulatory matters can rapidly change and are not always controllable by the Partnership, which may contribute to uncertainty and result in volatility in the estimate of losses.

Included in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements are additional discussions of the Partnership’s accounting policies.

THE EFFECTS OF INFLATION

The Partnership’s net assets are primarily monetary, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, firm-owned securities, and receivables, less liabilities. Monetary net assets are primarily liquid in nature and would not be significantly affected by inflation. Inflation and future expectations of inflation influence securities prices, as well as activity levels in the securities markets. As a result, profitability and capital may be impacted by inflation and inflationary expectations. Additionally, inflation’s impact on the Partnership’s operating expenses may affect profitability to the extent that additional costs are not recoverablerecovered through increasedattracting new clients, gathering new assets or raising prices of services offered by the Partnership.Partnership to increase revenue.

RECENTLY ISSUED AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

See Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statement and Supplementary Data – Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued and adopted accounting standards.None.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CHANGES

As disclosed in the Partnership's Form 8-K dated July 8, 2019, after 36 years of service to Edward Jones and its clients, the Partnership announced that Daniel J. Timm, general partner of the Partnership, member of the Partnership’s Executive, Management, and Audit Committees, and the Co-Leader of Branch Development, retired effective December 31, 2019. Mr. Timm began his career with Edward Jones in 1983 as a financial advisor in Iowa and South Dakota. He was named a general partner of the Partnership in 1998. During his tenure, Mr. Timm has held various roles at the Partnership, including in Financial Advisor Development and New Financial Advisor Training, as well as leader of Financial Advisor Training and Recruiting and Hiring, until assuming his current role. Since 2007, Mr. Timm has served as the Leader / Co-Leader of Branch Development, with overall responsibility for Edward Jones Financial Advisor and Branch Office Administrator roles.

As disclosed in the Partnership's Form 8-K dated November 5, 2019, on November 4, 2019, Managing Partner, Penny Pennington, announced the appointment of general partner Kristin M. Johnson, age 48, to the Partnership's Executive Committee. It was also announced that Ms. Johnson has been named Chief Human Resources Officer for Edward Jones.  

Ms. Johnson joined Edward Jones in 1995 as a member of the Internal Audit department and relocated to the Operations division five years later. She was named a principal in 2006.  Ms. Johnson has held leadership roles in internal audit, service, operations and talent acquisition and performance for branch office administrators. She was appointed to the Partnership's Management Committee in 2014, and in April 2019, Ms. Johnson was asked to serve as interim co-leader of Edward Jones' Human Resources division. Ms. Johnson was also appointed to the Partnership's Audit Committee.

4142


PART II

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Various levels of management within the Partnership manage the Partnership’s risk exposure. Position limits in inventory accounts are established and monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit risk related to various financing activities is reduced by the industry practice of obtaining and maintaining collateral. The Partnership monitors its exposure to counterparty risk through the use of credit exposure information, the monitoring of collateral values and the establishment of credit limits. For further discussion of monitoring, see the Risk Management discussion in Part III, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of this Annual Report. All amounts are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

The Partnership is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Such changes in interest rates impact the income from interest-earning assets, primarily receivables from clients onclient margin balances andloans, short-term primarily overnight, investments, which are primarily comprised of cash and cash equivalents, investments segregated under federal regulations,government and agency obligations and securities purchased under agreements to resell, whichand investments segregated under federal regulations. Client margin loans and short-term investments averaged $2.9$3.8 billion and $10.5$22.6 billion, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019.  These margin receivables2022 and investments earned interest at an average annual rate of approximately 501500 and 204125 basis points (5.01%(5.00% and 2.04%1.25%), respectively, in 2019.2022. Changes in interest rates also have an impact on the expense related to the liabilities that finance these assets, such as amounts payable to clients.

The Partnership performed an analysis of its financial instruments and assessed the related interest rate risk and materiality in accordance with the SEC rules. Under current market conditions and based on current levels of interest-earning assets and the liabilities that finance these assets, the Partnership estimates that a 100 basis100-basis point (1.00%) increase in short-term interest rates could increase its annual net interest income by approximately $146.$112. This estimate reflects minimum contractual rates on certain balances. Conversely, the Partnership estimates that a 100 basis100-basis point (1.00%) decrease in short-term interest rates could decrease the Partnership’s annual net interest income by approximately $128.$158.

4243


PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Financial Statements Included in this Item

Page No.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

4445

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm(PCAOB ID:238)

4546

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021

4748

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020

4849

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partnership Capital Subject to Mandatory Redemption for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020

4950

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020

5051

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

5152

4344


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL

OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and all wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Partnership”), is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Partnership’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Partnership’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As of the end of the Partnership’s 20192022 fiscal year, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192022 was effective.

The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management of the Partnership; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on its financial statements.

The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192022 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their accompanying report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2022.

4445


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Executive CommitteeEnterprise Leadership Team and Partners ofThe Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.:

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and its subsidiaries (the "Partnership") as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and the related consolidated statements of income, of changes in partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, including the related notes and the financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).We also have audited the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021, and the results of itsoperations and itscash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 2022in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.

Basis for Opinions

The Partnership's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

4546


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to theconsolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Asset-based Fee Revenue - Advisory Programs Fees

As described in Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, $7.384 billion of the firm's total asset-based fee revenue of $9.808 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022 was generated from program fees for investment advisory services provided within the Partnership’s advisory programs. Revenue from advisory programs fees are derived from fees determined by the underlying value of client assets. Advisory program contracts outline the investment advisory services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a definite end date. Program fees are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program as well as contractual rates and are charged to clients monthly and collected the following month.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to revenue from advisory program fees is a critical audit matter are the significant audit effort in performing procedures relating to the fees, which are calculated based on the valuation of client assets and the corresponding contractual rate charged to the client.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the recognition of revenue from advisory program fees. These procedures also included, for a sample of accounts, obtaining advisory program contracts and evaluating whether rates used in the calculations were consistent with the advisory program contracts, independently pricing the securities positions within the account, independently calculating the average assets under management, and independently calculating the advisory program fees.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

St. Louis, Missouri

March 12, 202010, 2023

We have served as the Partnership’sPartnership’s auditor since 2002.

4647


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

1,014

 

 

$

1,498

 

 

$

1,882

 

 

$

1,835

 

Cash and investments segregated under federal regulations

 

 

10,387

 

 

 

8,241

 

 

 

17,827

 

 

 

20,179

 

Securities purchased under agreements to resell

 

 

1,693

 

 

 

911

 

 

 

437

 

 

 

1,529

 

Receivable from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clients

 

 

3,328

 

 

 

3,359

 

 

 

4,375

 

 

 

4,187

 

Mutual funds, insurance companies and other

 

 

661

 

 

 

555

 

 

 

850

 

 

 

850

 

Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations

 

 

204

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

213

 

Securities owned, at fair value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment securities

 

 

332

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

1,329

 

 

 

852

 

Inventory securities

 

 

50

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

38

 

Lease right-of-use assets

 

 

876

 

 

 

 

 

 

922

 

 

 

922

 

Equipment, property and improvements, at cost, net of accumulated

depreciation and amortization

 

 

616

 

 

 

555

 

Fixed assets, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization

 

 

862

 

 

 

725

 

Other assets

 

 

156

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

932

 

 

 

878

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

19,317

 

 

$

15,815

 

 

$

29,892

 

 

$

32,208

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payable to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clients

 

$

12,891

 

 

$

11,117

 

 

$

21,359

 

 

$

23,763

 

Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations

 

 

66

 

 

 

90

 

 

 

392

 

 

 

112

 

Lease liabilities

 

 

898

 

 

 

 

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

 

 

1,747

 

 

 

1,465

 

 

 

2,165

 

 

 

2,401

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other

 

 

351

 

 

 

288

 

 

 

1,199

 

 

 

1,223

 

Lease liabilities

 

 

958

 

 

 

954

 

 

 

15,953

 

 

 

12,960

 

 

 

26,073

 

 

 

28,453

 

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13 and 14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for

anticipated withdrawals and partnership loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited partners

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

884

 

 

 

1,212

 

 

 

1,225

 

Subordinated limited partners

 

 

523

 

 

 

504

 

 

 

618

 

 

 

581

 

General partners

 

 

1,185

 

 

 

1,119

 

 

 

1,525

 

 

 

1,429

 

Total

 

 

2,957

 

 

 

2,507

 

 

 

3,355

 

 

 

3,235

 

Reserve for anticipated withdrawals

 

 

407

 

 

 

348

 

 

 

464

 

 

 

520

 

Total partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption

 

 

3,364

 

 

 

2,855

 

 

 

3,819

 

 

 

3,755

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

$

19,317

 

 

$

15,815

 

 

$

29,892

 

 

$

32,208

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

4748


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions, except per unit information and units outstanding)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fee revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based

 

$

6,778

 

 

$

6,075

 

 

$

5,047

 

 

$

9,808

 

 

$

9,737

 

 

$

7,515

 

Account and activity

 

 

674

 

 

 

678

 

 

 

678

 

 

 

692

 

 

 

687

 

 

 

660

 

Total fee revenue

 

 

7,452

 

 

 

6,753

 

 

 

5,725

 

 

 

10,500

 

 

 

10,424

 

 

 

8,175

 

Trade revenue

 

 

1,581

 

 

 

1,462

 

 

 

1,547

 

 

 

1,484

 

 

 

1,719

 

 

 

1,719

 

Interest and dividends

 

 

416

 

 

 

362

 

 

 

265

 

 

 

514

 

 

 

167

 

 

 

207

 

Other revenue

 

 

77

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

60

 

Other (loss) revenue, net

 

 

(87

)

 

 

63

 

 

 

64

 

Total revenue

 

 

9,526

 

 

 

8,594

 

 

 

7,597

 

 

 

12,411

 

 

 

12,373

 

 

 

10,165

 

Interest expense

 

 

157

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

102

 

Net revenue

 

 

9,369

 

 

 

8,469

 

 

 

7,506

 

 

 

12,269

 

 

 

12,279

 

 

 

10,063

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation and benefits

 

 

6,538

 

 

 

5,993

 

 

 

5,299

 

 

 

8,568

 

 

 

8,720

 

 

 

7,186

 

Communications and data processing

 

 

687

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

413

 

Occupancy and equipment

 

 

499

 

 

 

448

 

 

 

416

 

 

 

582

 

 

 

547

 

 

 

522

 

Communications and data processing

 

 

392

 

 

 

338

 

 

 

324

 

Fund sub-adviser fees

 

 

159

 

 

 

132

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

245

 

 

 

187

 

Professional and consulting fees

 

 

113

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

182

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

109

 

Advertising

 

 

96

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

86

 

Postage and shipping

 

 

56

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

64

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

424

 

 

 

334

 

 

 

278

 

 

 

596

 

 

 

526

 

 

 

361

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

8,277

 

 

 

7,479

 

 

 

6,634

 

 

 

10,865

 

 

 

10,674

 

 

 

8,778

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before allocations to partners

 

 

1,092

 

 

 

990

 

 

 

872

 

 

 

1,404

 

 

 

1,605

 

 

 

1,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocations to partners:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited partners

 

 

166

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

208

 

 

 

189

 

Subordinated limited partners

 

 

130

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

189

 

 

 

149

 

General partners

 

 

796

 

 

 

749

 

 

 

654

 

 

 

1,074

 

 

 

1,208

 

 

 

947

 

Net income

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income allocated to limited partners per weighted average $1,000

equivalent limited partnership unit outstanding

 

$

132.22

 

 

$

128.13

 

 

$

121.15

 

Income allocated to limited partners per weighted average $1,000
equivalent limited partnership unit outstanding

 

$

135.65

 

 

$

169.10

 

 

$

147.81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited partnership units

outstanding

 

 

1,256,459

 

 

 

889,502

 

 

 

896,566

 

 

 

1,219,815

 

 

 

1,230,986

 

 

 

1,242,781

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

4849


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL

SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020

(Dollars in millions)

 

Limited

Partnership

Capital

 

 

Subordinated

Limited

Partnership

Capital

 

 

General

Partnership

Capital

 

 

Total

 

 

Limited Partnership Capital

 

 

Subordinated Limited
Partnership Capital

 

 

General Partnership Capital

 

 

Total

 

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY

REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2016

 

$

959

 

 

$

445

 

 

$

1,230

 

 

$

2,634

 

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY
REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2019

 

$

1,359

 

 

$

566

 

 

$

1,439

 

 

$

3,364

 

Reserve for anticipated withdrawals

 

 

(57

)

 

 

(24

)

 

 

(136

)

 

 

(217

)

 

 

(110

)

 

 

(43

)

 

 

(254

)

 

 

(407

)

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of

reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2016

 

$

902

 

 

$

421

 

 

$

1,094

 

 

$

2,417

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

266

 

Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans,

net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2016

 

 

902

 

 

 

426

 

 

 

1,355

 

 

 

2,683

 

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of
reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2019

 

$

1,249

 

 

$

523

 

 

$

1,185

 

 

$

2,957

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

356

 

 

 

360

 

Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans,
net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2019

 

 

1,249

 

 

 

527

 

 

 

1,541

 

 

 

3,317

 

Issuance of partnership interests

 

 

1

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

213

 

Redemption of partnership interests

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(160

)

 

 

(193

)

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(37

)

 

 

(194

)

 

 

(244

)

Income allocated to partners

 

 

109

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

654

 

 

 

872

 

 

 

189

 

 

 

149

 

 

 

947

 

 

 

1,285

 

Distributions

 

 

(43

)

 

 

(73

)

 

 

(376

)

 

 

(492

)

 

 

(64

)

 

 

(93

)

 

 

(484

)

 

 

(641

)

Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans

 

 

956

 

 

 

502

 

 

 

1,634

 

 

 

3,092

 

 

 

1,362

 

 

 

595

 

 

 

1,973

 

 

 

3,930

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(294

)

 

 

(297

)

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY

REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2017

 

$

956

 

 

$

499

 

 

$

1,340

 

 

$

2,795

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(340

)

 

 

(341

)

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY
REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2020

 

$

1,362

 

 

$

594

 

 

$

1,633

 

 

$

3,589

 

Reserve for anticipated withdrawals

 

 

(66

)

 

 

(36

)

 

 

(188

)

 

 

(290

)

 

 

(125

)

 

 

(56

)

 

 

(333

)

 

 

(514

)

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of

reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2017

 

$

890

 

 

$

463

 

 

$

1,152

 

 

$

2,505

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

294

 

 

 

297

 

Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans,

net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2017

 

 

890

 

 

 

466

 

 

 

1,446

 

 

 

2,802

 

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of
reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2020

 

$

1,237

 

 

$

538

 

 

$

1,300

 

 

$

3,075

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

340

 

 

 

341

 

Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans,
net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2020

 

 

1,237

 

 

 

539

 

 

 

1,640

 

 

 

3,416

 

Issuance of partnership interests

 

 

5

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

172

 

 

 

230

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

288

 

Redemption of partnership interests

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(274

)

 

 

(296

)

 

 

(17

)

 

 

(19

)

 

 

(277

)

 

 

(313

)

Income allocated to partners

 

 

114

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

749

 

 

 

990

 

 

 

208

 

 

 

189

 

 

 

1,208

 

 

 

1,605

 

Distributions

 

 

(42

)

 

 

(86

)

 

 

(411

)

 

 

(539

)

 

 

(72

)

 

 

(130

)

 

 

(718

)

 

 

(920

)

Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans

 

 

956

 

 

 

549

 

 

 

1,682

 

 

 

3,187

 

 

 

1,361

 

 

 

640

 

 

 

2,075

 

 

 

4,076

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(328

)

 

 

(332

)

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY

REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2018

 

$

956

 

 

$

545

 

 

$

1,354

 

 

$

2,855

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(321

)

 

 

(321

)

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY
REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2021

 

$

1,361

 

 

$

640

 

 

$

1,754

 

 

$

3,755

 

Reserve for anticipated withdrawals

 

 

(72

)

 

 

(41

)

 

 

(235

)

 

 

(348

)

 

 

(136

)

 

 

(59

)

 

 

(325

)

 

 

(520

)

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of

reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2018

 

$

884

 

 

$

504

 

 

$

1,119

 

 

$

2,507

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

328

 

 

 

332

 

Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans,

net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2018

 

 

884

 

 

 

508

 

 

 

1,447

 

 

 

2,839

 

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of
reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2021

 

$

1,225

 

 

$

581

 

 

$

1,429

 

 

$

3,235

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

321

 

 

 

321

 

Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans,
net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2021

 

 

1,225

 

 

 

581

 

 

 

1,750

 

 

 

3,556

 

Issuance of partnership interests

 

 

380

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

163

 

 

 

596

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

277

 

 

 

339

 

Redemption of partnership interests

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(34

)

 

 

(179

)

 

 

(228

)

 

 

(17

)

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(314

)

 

 

(352

)

Income allocated to partners

 

 

166

 

 

 

130

 

 

 

796

 

 

 

1,092

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

1,074

 

 

 

1,404

 

Distributions

 

 

(56

)

 

 

(87

)

 

 

(432

)

 

 

(575

)

 

 

(65

)

 

 

(112

)

 

 

(616

)

 

 

(793

)

Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans

 

 

1,359

 

 

 

570

 

 

 

1,795

 

 

 

3,724

 

 

 

1,312

 

 

 

671

 

 

 

2,171

 

 

 

4,154

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(356

)

 

 

(360

)

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY

REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2019

 

$

1,359

 

 

$

566

 

 

$

1,439

 

 

$

3,364

 

Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(335

)

 

 

(335

)

TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY
REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2022

 

$

1,312

 

 

$

671

 

 

$

1,836

 

 

$

3,819

 

Reserve for anticipated withdrawals

 

 

(110

)

 

 

(43

)

 

 

(254

)

 

 

(407

)

 

 

(100

)

 

 

(53

)

 

 

(311

)

 

 

(464

)

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of

reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2019

 

$

1,249

 

 

$

523

 

 

$

1,185

 

 

$

2,957

 

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of
reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2022

 

$

1,212

 

 

$

618

 

 

$

1,525

 

 

$

3,355

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

4950


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

 

For the years ended December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided

by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before allocations to partners

 

 

1,092

 

 

 

990

 

 

 

872

 

 

 

1,404

 

 

 

1,605

 

 

 

1,285

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

115

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

499

 

 

 

461

 

 

 

443

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments segregated under federal regulations

 

 

(2,392

)

 

 

1,406

 

 

 

1,747

 

 

 

2,981

 

 

 

(2,140

)

 

 

(8,774

)

Securities purchased under agreements to resell

 

 

(782

)

 

 

253

 

 

 

(272

)

 

 

1,092

 

 

 

185

 

 

 

(21

)

Net payable to clients

 

 

1,805

 

 

 

(1,752

)

 

 

(2,775

)

 

 

(2,592

)

 

 

1,839

 

 

 

8,174

 

Net receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations

 

 

33

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

(60

)

 

 

93

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

11

 

Receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies and other

 

 

(106

)

 

 

(15

)

 

 

(27

)

 

 

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

(157

)

Securities owned

 

 

(89

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

(41

)

 

 

(515

)

 

 

444

 

 

 

(952

)

Lease right-of-use asset

 

 

(71

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

 

 

 

(54

)

 

 

(195

)

 

 

(67

)

Lease liability

 

 

93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease liabilities

 

 

(326

)

 

 

(322

)

 

 

(306

)

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

 

 

282

 

 

 

126

 

 

 

223

 

 

 

(236

)

 

 

297

 

 

 

357

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other

 

 

47

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

227

 

 

 

32

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

13

 

 

 

1,138

 

 

 

(244

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

2,353

 

 

 

2,395

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of equipment, property and improvements

 

 

(176

)

 

 

(105

)

 

 

(80

)

Purchase of fixed assets

 

 

(302

)

 

 

(234

)

 

 

(129

)

Cash used in investing activities

 

 

(176

)

 

 

(105

)

 

 

(80

)

 

 

(302

)

 

 

(234

)

 

 

(129

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of general partnership loans

 

 

71

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

Issuance of partnership interests

 

 

432

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

50

 

Redemption of partnership interests

 

 

(216

)

 

 

(199

)

 

 

(193

)

 

 

(336

)

 

 

(260

)

 

 

(214

)

Distributions from partnership capital

 

 

(783

)

 

 

(694

)

 

 

(598

)

 

 

(1,173

)

 

 

(1,181

)

 

 

(864

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(567

)

 

 

(833

)

 

 

(711

)

 

 

(1,375

)

 

 

(1,330

)

 

 

(1,028

)

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

(730

)

 

 

200

 

 

 

(1,035

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

676

 

 

 

831

 

 

 

(1,132

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

 

8,737

 

 

 

8,537

 

 

 

9,572

 

 

 

7,706

 

 

 

6,875

 

 

 

8,007

 

End of year

 

$

8,007

 

 

$

8,737

 

 

$

8,537

 

 

$

8,382

 

 

$

7,706

 

 

$

6,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Note 1918 for additional cash flow information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

5051


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per unit information and the number of financial advisors)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Partnership’s Business and Basis of Accounting. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and all wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Partnership” or "JFC"). The financial position of the Partnership’s subsidiaries in Canada as of November 30, 20192022 and 20182021 are included in the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and the results for the twelve month periods ended November 30, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020 are included in the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partnership Capital Subject to Mandatory Redemption and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows because of the timing of the Partnership’s financial reporting process.

The Partnership’s principal operating subsidiary, Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (“Edward Jones”), is a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser in the United States (“U.S.”), and one of Edward Jones’ subsidiaries, Edward Jones (an Ontario limited partnership) ("EJ Canada"), is a registered broker-dealer in Canada. Through these entities, the Partnership primarily serves individual investors in the U.S. and Canada. Edward Jones is a retail brokerage business and primarily derives revenues from fees for providing investment advisory and other account services to its clients, fees for assets held by clients and commissions for the distribution of mutual fund shares and commissions forinsurance products and the purchase or sale of securities and the purchase of insurance products.securities. The Partnership conducts business throughout the U.S. and Canada with its clients, various brokers, dealers, clearing organizations, depositories and banks. For financial information related to the Partnership’s two operating segments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017,2020, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Trust services are offered to Edward Jones’ U.S. clients through Edward Jones Trust Company (“Trust Co.”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership. Olive Street Investment Advisers, LLC ("Olive Street"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, provides investment advisory services to the eighteleven sub-advised mutual funds comprising the Bridge Builder® Trust ("BB Trust"). Passport Research, Ltd. ("Passport Research"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, providesprovided investment advisory services to the sub-advised Edward Jones Money Market Fund ("(the "Money Market Fund") through November 1, 2022. Effective November 2, 2022, the Money Market Fund").  Fund's Board of Trustees approved the transfer of its investment advisory services from Passport Research to Olive Street, which did not have a material effect on the Partnership's Consolidated Financial Statements. The Partnership is currently in the process of dissolving Passport Research.

The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which require the use of certain estimates by management in determining the Partnership’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain prior period balances have been adjusted to align to current year presentation. The Partnership evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure through March 12, 2020,10, 2023, which was the date these Consolidated Financial Statements were available to be issued, and identified no matters requiring disclosure other than the events in Notes 8 and 14.  disclosure.

Partnership Agreement. Under the terms of the Partnership’s TwentiethTwenty-First Amended and Restated Agreement of Registered Limited Liability Limited Partnership, dated August 6, 2018,September 1, 2021, (the “Partnership Agreement”), a partner’s capital is required to be redeemed by the Partnership in the event of the partner’s death or withdrawal from the Partnership, subject to compliance with ongoing regulatory capital requirements. In the event of a partner’s death, the Partnership generally redeems the partner’s capital within six months.months. The Partnership has restrictions in place which govern the withdrawal of capital. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, limited partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership are to be repaid their capital in three equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their withdrawal notice is received by the Managing Partner (as defined in the Partnership Agreement). The capital of general partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership is converted to subordinated limited partnership capital or, at the discretion of the Managing Partner, redeemed by the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners requesting withdrawal are repaid their capital in six equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their request for withdrawal of contributed capital is received by the Managing Partner. The Partnership’s Managing Partner has discretion to waive or modify these withdrawal restrictions and to accelerate the return of capital. All current and future Partnership capital is subordinate to all current and future liabilities of the Partnership. The Partnership Agreement includes additional terms.

5152


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Revenue Recognition.The Partnership's revenue is recognized based on contracts with clients, mutual fund companies, insurance companies and other product providers.  As a full-service brokerage firm, Edward Jones provides clients with custodial services, including safekeeping of client funds, collecting and disbursing funds from a client's account, and providing trade confirmations and account statements.  The Partnership does not charge a separate fee for these services.  Revenue is generally recognized in the same manner for both the U.S. and Canada segments.

The Partnership classifies its revenue into the following categories:

Asset-based fee revenue – Revenue is derived from fees determined by the underlying value of client assets and includes advisory programs fees, service fees, and other asset-based fee revenue.  The primary source of asset-based fee revenue is generated from program fees for investment advisory services provided within the Partnership’s advisory programs, including in the U.S., the Edward Jones Advisory Solutions® program (“Advisory Solutions”) and the Edward Jones Guided Solutions® program ("Guided Solutions") and, in Canada, the Edward Jones Portfolio Program® and the Edward Jones Guided Portfolios® program.  Advisory program contracts outline the investment advisory services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a definite end date.  Program fees are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program as well as contractual rates and are charged to clients monthly and collected the following month.  The investment advisory services performed in an advisory program contract are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client.  As a result, the contract has one performance obligation and program fee revenue is recognized over time as clients simultaneously receive and consume the benefit from the investment advisory services performed by the Partnership.

The Partnership's contracts with mutual fund and insurance companies, along with the prospectuses for mutual funds, allow the Partnership to sell those companies' products to clients (see Trade revenue below for the associated commissions earned from clients) and earn service fees for providing certain distribution and marketing support services for those companies' products held by Edward Jones clients. For mutual funds, those service fees are based on the terms of the mutual fund prospectuses. Service fees are generally based on the average daily market value of client assets held in a company's mutual fund or insurance product.  For future service fees the Partnership may earn on existing client assets, market constraints prevent reasonably estimating the transaction price and estimates could result in significant revenue reversals.  Thus, service fee revenue is recognized monthly at the time the market constraints have been removed, the transaction price is known and the services have been performed.  Other asset-based fee revenue consists of revenue sharing, fund adviser fees, cash solutions and Trust Co. fees.  The Partnership has agreements with clients or product providers to earn other asset-based fees for providing services, which generally include providing investment advice or service to clients or mutual funds, or marketing support or other services to product providers.  Fees are generally based on asset values held in clients' accounts.  The services performed for other asset-based fee contracts are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client.  As a result, the contracts have one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit from the services performed by the Partnership.  For both service fees and other asset-based fee revenue, revenue is collected monthly or quarterly based on the agreements and the agreements generally do not have a term.  Due to the timing of receipt of information, the Partnership uses estimates in recording the accruals related to certain asset-based fees, which are based on historical trends and are adjusted to reflect market conditions for the period covered.  

Account and activity fee revenue – Revenue is derived from fees based on the number of accounts or activity and includes shareholder accounting services fees, self-directed individual retirement account ("IRA") fees, and other activity-based fee revenue from clients, mutual fund companies and insurance companies.  The Partnership has agreements with mutual fund companies for shareholder accounting services in which the Partnership performs certain transfer agent support services, which may include tracking client holdings, distributing dividends and shareholder information to clients, and responding to client inquiries.  Shareholder accounting services fees are based on the number of mutual fund positions held by clients and fees are collected monthly or quarterly based on the agreements, which generally do not have a term.  The transfer agent support services performed in a shareholder accounting services contract are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client.  As a result, the contract has one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as the mutual fund company simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit from the services performed by the Partnership.  The Partnership also earns retirement account fees for providing reporting services pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code and account maintenance services.  Clients are charged an annual fee per account for these services.  Revenue is recognized over a one-year period as the services are provided, which are simultaneously received and consumed by the client.  

52


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Trade revenue – Revenue is derived from fees based on client transactions and includes commissions and principal transactions.  The primary source of trade revenue is commissions revenue which consists of charges to clients for the purchase or sale of mutual fund shares and equities and the purchase of insurance products.  Principal transactions revenue primarily results from the Partnership’s distribution of and participation in principal trading activities in municipal obligations, over-the-counter corporate obligations, and certificates of deposit.  Principal transactions are generally entered into by the Partnership to facilitate a client's buy or sell order for certain fixed income products.  Brokerage contracts outline the transaction services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a term.  The transaction charge to clients varies based on the product and size of the trade.  The Partnership's contracts with mutual fund and insurance companies, along with the prospectuses for mutual funds, allow the Partnership to sell those companies' products to clients and earn certain commissions, which for mutual funds, are aligned with the terms of the mutual fund prospectuses.   Trade revenue is recognized at a point in time when the transaction is placed, or trade date.  On trade date the client obtains control through a right to either own a security for a purchase or receive payment for a sale.  Transaction charges are received no later than settlement date.

Interest and dividends revenue – Interest revenue is earned on client margin (loan) account balances.  In addition, interest revenue is earned on cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, securities purchased under agreements to resell and Partnership loans, none of which is based on revenue contracts with clients.

Other forms of revenue are recorded on an accrual basis.  Activity or transaction-based revenue is recorded at a point in time when the transaction occurs and asset-based revenue is recorded over time as the services are provided.   

Foreign Exchange.  Assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate at the end of the period.  Revenue and expenses denominated in a foreign currency are translated using the average exchange rate for each period.  Foreign exchange gains and losses are included in other revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fair Value. Substantially all of the Partnership’s financial assets and financial liabilities covered under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure (“ASC 820”), are carried at fair value or at contracted amounts which approximate fair value given the short time to maturity.

Fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, also known as the “exit price.”  Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices.  The Partnership’s financial assets and financial liabilities recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value.  Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820, with the related amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to value these assets and liabilities at fair value for each level, are as follows:

Level I – Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

The types of assets categorized as Level I generally are U.S. treasuries, investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted market prices, equities listed in active markets, and government and agency obligations.

Level II – Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level I) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with related market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life.  The Partnership uses the market approach valuation technique which incorporates third-party pricing services and other relevant observable information (such as market interest rates, yield curves, prepayment risk and credit risk generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities) in valuing these types of investments.  When third-party pricing services are used, the methods and assumptions used are reviewed by the Partnership.

The types of assets categorized as Level II generally are certificates of deposit, state and municipal obligations and corporate bonds and notes.

53


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Level III – Inputs are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.  These inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.  Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the inputs to the model.

The Partnership did not have any assets or liabilities categorized as Level III during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.  

Cash and Cash Equivalents.  The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Cash and Investments Segregated under Federal Regulations.  Cash, investments and the related interest receivable are segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell.  The Partnership participates in short-term resale agreements collateralized by government and agency securities.  These transactions are reported as collateralized financing and are carried at cost with accrued interest in receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies and other within the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.  The fair value of the underlying collateral, plus accrued interest, must equal or exceed 102% of the carrying amount of the transaction in U.S. agreements and must equal or exceed 100% of the carrying amount of the transaction in Canada agreements.  It is the Partnership’s policy to have such underlying resale agreement collateral delivered to the Partnership or deposited in its accounts at its custodian banks.  The Partnership considers these financing receivables to be of good credit quality and, as a result, has not recorded a related allowance for credit loss.  In addition, the Partnership considers risk related to these resale agreements to be minimal due to the fact that these resale agreements are fully collateralized.  The fair value of the collateral related to these agreements was $1,724 and $926 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and was not repledged or sold.

Collateral.  The Partnership reports as assets collateral it has pledged in secured borrowings and other arrangements when the secured party cannot sell or repledge the assets or the Partnership can substitute collateral or otherwise redeem it on short notice.  The Partnership does not report collateral it has received in secured lending and other arrangements as an asset when the debtor has the right to redeem or substitute the collateral on short notice.

Securities Owned. Securities owned, primarily consisting of investment securities, are recorded on a trade-date basis at fair value which is determined by using quoted market or dealer prices.  The Partnership records the related unrealized gains and losses for inventory securities in trade revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  The unrealized gains and losses for investment securities are recorded in other revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  

Equipment, Property and Improvements.  Equipment, including furniture and fixtures, is recorded at cost and depreciated using straight-line and accelerated methods over estimated useful lives of three to ten years.  Buildings are depreciated using the straight-line method over their useful lives, which are estimated at thirty years.  Leasehold improvements are amortized based on the term of the lease or the economic useful life of the improvement, whichever is less.  When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the respective category and any related gain or loss is recorded as other revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.  The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged against income as incurred, whereas significant enhancements are capitalized.  Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of the asset may not be fully recoverable.  If impairment is indicated, the asset value is written down to its fair value.

54


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.  The Partnership has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain financial advisors.  The Partnership has recorded a liability of $235 for the future payments due to financial advisors participating in the plan.  As the future amounts due to financial advisors change in accordance with plan requirements, the Partnership records the change in future amounts owed to financial advisors as an increase or decrease in accrued compensation in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and compensation and benefits expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.  The Partnership has chosen to economically hedge this future liability by purchasing securities in an amount similar to the future liability expected to be due in accordance with the plan.  These securities are included in investment securities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and the unrealized gains and losses are recorded in other revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.  Each period, the net impact of the change in future amounts owed to financial advisors in the non-qualified deferred compensation plan and the change in investment securities are approximately the same, resulting in minimal net impact in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Retirement Transition Plans.  The Partnership, in certain circumstances, offers individually tailored retirement transition plans to retiring financial advisors.  Each retirement transition plan compensates a retiring financial advisor for successfully providing client transition services in accordance with a retirement and transition agreement.  Generally, the retirement and transition agreement is for five years.  During the first two years the retiring financial advisor remains an employee and provides client transition services, which include, but are not limited to, the successful transition of client accounts and assets to successor financial advisors, as well as mentoring and providing training and support to successor financial advisors.  The financial advisor retires at the end of year two and is subject to a non-compete agreement for three years.  Most retiring financial advisors participating in a retirement transition plan are paid ratably over four years.  Compensation expense is generally recognized ratably over the two-year transition period which aligns with the service period of most agreements, with compensation expense related to some plans recognized over one year depending on the size and complexity of the transition plan.  As of December 31, 2019, $102 was accrued for future payments to advisors who have already started a plan, approximately $52 of which is expected to be paid in 2020.  As of December 31, 2018, $94 was accrued.Successor financial advisors receive reduced compensation on transitioned assets for up to four years.  

Lease Accounting.  The Partnership leases branch office space under numerous operating leases from non-affiliates and financial advisors.  Branch offices are generally leased for terms of five years and generally contain a renewal option.  Renewal options are not included in the lease term if it is not reasonably certain the Partnership will exercise the renewal option. The Partnership also leases home office spaces and land from non-affiliates with terms ranging from 12 to 30 years.

The Partnership recognizes lease liabilities for future lease payments and lease right-of-use assets for the right of use of an underlying asset within a contract.  Current leases are all classified as operating leases. Lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at commencement date and calculated as the present value of the sum of the remaining fixed lease payments over the lease term. Throughout the lease term, the lease right-of-use asset includes the impact from the timing of lease payments and straight-line rent expense. The Partnership used its incremental borrowing rate based on information available at lease commencement as leases do not contain a readily determinable implicit rate.  A single lease cost, or rent expense, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Partnership does not separate lease components (i.e., fixed payments including rent, real estate taxes and insurance costs) from non-lease components (i.e., common-area maintenance) and recognizes them as a single lease component. Variable lease payments not included within lease contracts are expensed as incurred.  See Note 2 for additional information.

Income Taxes.  Generally, income taxes have not been provided for in the Consolidated Financial Statements due to the partnership tax structure where each partner is liable for his or her own tax payments.  For the jurisdictions in which the Partnership is liable for payments, the income tax provisions are immaterial (see Note 11).

55


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Partnership Capital Subject to Mandatory Redemption.  FASB ASC No. 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”), established standards for classifying and measuring certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity.  Under the provisions of ASC 480, the obligation to redeem a partner’s capital in the event of a partner’s death is one of the criteria requiring capital to be classified as a liability.

Since the Partnership Agreement obligates the Partnership to redeem a partner’s capital after a partner’s death, ASC 480 requires all of the Partnership’s equity capital to be classified as a liability.  In accordance with ASC 480, income allocable to limited, subordinated limited and general partners is classified as a reduction of income before allocations to partners, which results in a presentation of $0 net income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.  The financial statement presentations required to comply with ASC 480 do not alter the Partnership’s treatment of income, income allocations or capital for any other purposes.

Net income, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, is equivalent to income before allocations to partners on the Consolidated Statements of Income.  Such income, if any, for each calendar year is allocated to the Partnership’s three classes of capital in accordance with the formulas prescribed in the Partnership Agreement.  Income allocations are based upon partner capital contributions including capital contributions financed with loans from the Partnership.  First, limited partners are allocated net income (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) in accordance with the prescribed formula for their share of net income.  Limited partners generally do not share in the net loss in any year in which there is a net loss and the Partnership is not dissolved or liquidated.  Thereafter, subordinated limited partners and general partners are allocated any remaining net income or net loss based on formulas as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

The limited partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is held by current and former associates and general partners of the Partnership.  Limited partners participate in the Partnership’s profits and are paid a minimum 7.5% annual return on the face amount of their capital (see Note 9) in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.

The subordinated limited partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is held by current and former general partners of the Partnership.  Subordinated limited partners receive a percentage of the Partnership’s net income determined in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.  The subordinated limited partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is subordinated to the limited partnership capital.

The general partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is held by current general partners of the Partnership.  General partners receive a percentage of the Partnership’s net income determined in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.  The general partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is subordinated to the limited partnership capital and the subordinated limited partnership capital.

Advertising.  Advertising activities include the cost to produce and distribute campaigns market wide to attract and retain clients and financial advisors. Such costs are generally expensed when incurred.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards.    In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASC 842”), which requires lessees to recognize leases with terms greater than 12 months on the balance sheet as lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842), which allows an entity to recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of Partnership capital in the period of adoption and prior periods do not have to be restated.  Effective January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted ASC 842 and recorded a lease right-of-use asset of $785 and lease liability of $805 related to the Partnership's branch office network and home offices. The lease right-of-use asset was reduced by $20 for deferred rent on existing leases at adoption. The cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of Partnership capital was zero and prior periods were not restated. The Partnership elected the package of practical expedients for leases that commenced prior to January 1, 2019, which allowed the Partnership to not reassess whether any contracts are or contain leases, lease classification for expired or existing leases, and initial direct costs for existing leases.  There was no material impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows or net capital requirements of Edward Jones. See Note 2 for additional information.

56


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) – Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”).  ASU 2016-13 removes the "probable" threshold for credit loss recognition, requiring companies to capture all expected credit losses and to consider a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates.  The Partnership concluded its evaluation of ASU 2016-13 and there will not be a material impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements from adoption on January 1, 2020.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement ("ASU 2018-13"). ASU 2018-13 removed and modified various requirements of Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The Partnership early adopted ASU 2018-13 on January 1, 2019 with the only impact of adoption being the removal of the certain disclosures for transfers.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract ("ASU 2018-15"). ASU 2018-15 aligns the capitalization requirements for implementation costs for cloud computing arrangement service contracts (including those without a software license) with the current guidance for internal-use software licenses. Companies could elect to adopt the standard either prospectively or retrospectively. The Partnership adopted the standard on January 1, 2020 on a prospective basis without a material impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE 2 – Leases

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $283 and lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities was $360.  As of December 31, 2019, the weighted-average remaining lease term was four years, and the weighted-average discount rate was 3.2%.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, operating lease cost was $280 and variable lease cost not included in the lease liability was $55. Total lease cost for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $335. The Partnership's future undiscounted cash outflows for operating leases as of December 31, 2019 are summarized below:

2020

$

283

 

2021

 

239

 

2022

 

183

 

2023

 

128

 

2024

 

65

 

Thereafter

 

63

 

Total lease payments

 

961

 

Less: Interest

 

63

 

Total present value of lease liabilities

$

898

 

While the rights and obligations for leases that have not yet commenced are not significant, the Partnership regularly enters into new branch office leases.    

Under ASC 840, Leases, the predecessor to ASC 842, rent and other lease-related expenses were $305 and $284 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Additionally, the Partnership's portion of the long-term lease commitments that were non-cancellable as of December 31, 2018 are summarized below:

2019

$

182

 

2020

 

56

 

2021

 

39

 

2022

 

19

 

2023

 

9

 

Thereafter

 

10

 

Total

$

315

 

57


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 3 – Revenue

The following table shows the Partnership's disaggregated revenue information for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

2019

 

U.S.

 

 

Canada

 

 

Total

 

Fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory programs fees

 

$

4,740

 

 

$

70

 

 

$

4,810

 

Service fees

 

 

1,241

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

1,329

 

Other asset-based fees

 

 

639

 

 

 

 

 

 

639

 

Total asset-based fee revenue

 

 

6,620

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

6,778

 

Account and activity fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder accounting services fees

 

 

432

 

 

 

 

 

 

432

 

Other account and activity fee revenue

 

 

229

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

242

 

Total account and activity fee revenue

 

 

661

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

674

 

   Total fee revenue

 

 

7,281

 

 

 

171

 

 

 

7,452

 

Trade revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions

 

 

1,428

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

1,475

 

Principal transactions

 

 

102

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

106

 

Total trade revenue

 

 

1,530

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

1,581

 

Total revenue from customers

 

 

8,811

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

9,033

 

Net interest and dividends and other revenue

 

 

316

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

336

 

Net revenue

 

$

9,127

 

 

$

242

 

 

$

9,369

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

U.S.

 

 

Canada

 

 

Total

 

Fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory programs fees

 

$

4,156

 

 

$

58

 

 

$

4,214

 

Service fees

 

 

1,218

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

1,305

 

Other asset-based fees

 

 

556

 

 

 

 

 

 

556

 

Total asset-based fee revenue

 

 

5,930

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

6,075

 

Account and activity fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder accounting services fees

 

 

432

 

 

 

 

 

 

432

 

Other account and activity fee revenue

 

 

232

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

246

 

Total account and activity fee revenue

 

 

664

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

678

 

   Total fee revenue

 

 

6,594

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

6,753

 

Trade revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions

 

 

1,271

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

1,320

 

Principal transactions

 

 

137

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

142

 

Total trade revenue

 

 

1,408

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

1,462

 

Total revenue from customers

 

 

8,002

 

 

 

213

 

 

 

8,215

 

Net interest and dividends and other revenue

 

 

231

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

254

 

Net revenue

 

$

8,233

 

 

$

236

 

 

$

8,469

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58


PART II

Item 8.Financial8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

2017

 

U.S.

 

 

Canada

 

 

Total

 

Fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory programs fees

 

$

3,299

 

 

$

42

 

 

$

3,341

 

Service fees

 

 

1,180

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

1,259

 

Other asset-based fees

 

 

447

 

 

 

 

 

 

447

 

Total asset-based fee revenue

 

 

4,926

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

5,047

 

Account and activity fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder accounting services fees

 

 

412

 

 

 

 

 

 

412

 

Other account and activity fee revenue

 

 

254

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

266

 

Total account and activity fee revenue

 

 

666

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

678

 

   Total fee revenue

 

 

5,592

 

 

 

133

 

 

 

5,725

 

Trade revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions

 

 

1,355

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

1,407

 

Principal transactions

 

 

137

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

140

 

Total trade revenue

 

 

1,492

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

1,547

 

Total revenue from customers

 

 

7,084

 

 

 

188

 

 

 

7,272

 

Net interest and dividends and other revenue

 

 

221

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

234

 

Net revenue

 

$

7,305

 

 

$

201

 

 

$

7,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue Recognition.The Partnership's revenue is recognized based on contracts with clients, mutual fund companies, insurance companies and other product providers. As a full-service brokerage firm, Edward Jones provides clients with custodial services, including safekeeping of client funds, collecting and disbursing funds from a client's account, and providing trade confirmations and account statements. The Partnership does not charge a separate fee for these services. Revenue is generally recognized in the same manner for both the U.S. and Canada segments.

The Partnership classifies its revenue into the following categories:

Asset-based fee revenue – Revenue is derived 14%from fees determined by the underlying value of client assets and includes advisory programs fees, service fees, and other asset-based fee revenue. The primary source of asset-based fee revenue is generated from program fees for investment advisory services provided within the Partnership’s advisory programs, including in the U.S., 14%the Edward Jones Advisory Solutions® program (“Advisory Solutions”) and 16%the Edward Jones Guided Solutions® program ("Guided Solutions") and, in Canada, the Edward Jones Portfolio Program® and the Edward Jones Guided Portfolios® program. Advisory program contracts outline the investment advisory services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a definite end date. Program fees are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program as well as contractual rates and are charged to clients monthly and collected the following month. The investment advisory services performed in an advisory program contract are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client. As a result, the contract has one performance obligation and program fee revenue is recognized over time as clients simultaneously receive and consume the benefit from the investment advisory services performed by the Partnership.

The Partnership's contracts with mutual fund and insurance companies, along with the prospectuses for mutual funds, allow the Partnership to sell those companies' products to clients (see Trade revenue below for the associated commissions earned from clients) and earn service fees for providing certain distribution and marketing support services for those companies' products held by Edward Jones clients. For mutual funds, those service fees are based on the terms of the mutual fund prospectuses. Service fees are generally based on the average daily market value of client assets held in a company's mutual fund or insurance product. For future service fees the Partnership may earn on existing client assets, market constraints prevent reasonably estimating the transaction price and estimates could result in significant revenue reversals. Thus, service fee revenue is recognized monthly at the time the market constraints have been removed, the transaction price is known and the services have been performed. Other asset-based fee revenue consists of revenue sharing, fund adviser fees, cash solutions and Trust Co. fees. The Partnership has agreements with clients or product providers to earn other asset-based fees for providing services, which generally include providing investment advice or service to clients or mutual funds, or marketing support or other services to product providers. Additionally, the Partnership earns cash solutions revenue from the Edward Jones Insured Bank Deposit Program (the "IBD Program"), which is an interest-bearing savings solution for clients that offers Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage. Edward Jones has agreements with FDIC-insured third-party banks to transfer available cash balances in participating clients' accounts to interest-bearing deposit accounts at those banks. The Partnership, as agent, earns net revenue from fees derived from the average daily deposit balance in the IBD Program. Other asset-based fees are generally based on asset values held in clients' accounts. The services performed for other asset-based fee contracts are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client. As a result, the contracts have one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit from the services performed by the Partnership. For both service fees and other asset-based fee revenue, revenue is collected monthly or quarterly based on the agreements and the agreements generally do not have a term. Due to the timing of receipt of information, the Partnership uses estimates in recording the accruals related to certain asset-based fees, which are based on historical trends and are adjusted to reflect market conditions for the period covered.

Account and activity fee revenue – Revenue is derived from fees based on the number of accounts or activity and includes shareholder accounting services fees, self-directed individual retirement account ("IRA") fees, and other activity-based fee revenue from clients, mutual fund companies and insurance companies. The Partnership has agreements with mutual fund companies for shareholder accounting services in which the Partnership performs certain transfer agent support services, which may include tracking client holdings, distributing dividends and shareholder information to clients, and responding to client inquiries. Shareholder accounting services fees are based on the number of mutual fund positions held by clients and fees are collected monthly or quarterly based on the agreements, which generally do not have a term. The transfer agent support services performed in a shareholder accounting services contract are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client. As a result, the contract has one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as the mutual fund company simultaneously receives and consumes the

53


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

benefit from the services performed by the Partnership. The Partnership also earns retirement account fees for providing reporting services pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code and account maintenance services. Clients are charged an annual fee per account for these services. Revenue is recognized over a one-year period as the services are provided, which are simultaneously received and consumed by the client.

Trade revenue – Revenue is derived from fees based on client transactions and includes commissions and principal transactions. The primary source of trade revenue is from commissions revenue which consists of charges to clients for the distribution of mutual fund shares and insurance products and the purchase or sale of securities. Principal transactions revenue primarily results from the Partnership’s distribution of and participation in principal trading activities in municipal obligations, certificates of deposit and corporate obligations. Principal transactions are generally entered into by the Partnership to facilitate a client's buy or sell order for certain fixed income products. Brokerage contracts outline the transaction services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a term. The transaction charge to clients varies based on the product and size of the trade. The Partnership's contracts with mutual fund and insurance companies, along with the prospectuses for mutual funds, allow the Partnership to sell those companies' products to clients and earn certain commissions, which for mutual funds, are aligned with the terms of the mutual fund prospectuses. Trade revenue is recognized at a point in time when the transaction is placed, or trade date. On trade date the client obtains control through a right to either own a security for a purchase or receive payment for a sale. Transaction charges are received no later than settlement date.

Interest and dividends revenue – Interest revenue is earned on client margin loan balances. In addition, interest revenue is earned on cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Partnership loans and investment securities, none of which is based on revenue contracts with clients.

Other revenue (loss), net – Other revenue (loss), net, primarily consists of unrealized gains and losses associated with changes in the fair market value of the Partnership's investment securities held to generate income and to assist in the management of firm liquidity, as well as securities held to economically hedge future liabilities for its totalnon-qualified deferred compensation plan. Unrealized gains and losses are impacted by changes in market levels and the interest rate environment.

All revenues are recorded on an accrual basis. For forms of revenue not specifically discussed above, asset-based revenue is recorded over time as the services are provided, and activity or transaction-based revenue is recorded at a point in time when the transaction occurs.

Foreign Exchange. Assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate at the end of the period. Revenue and expenses denominated in a foreign currency are translated using the average exchange rate for each period. Foreign exchange gains and losses are included in other revenue (loss), net on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fair Value. Substantially all of the Partnership’s financial assets and financial liabilities covered under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure (“ASC 820”), are carried at fair value or at contracted amounts which approximate fair value given the short time to maturity.

Fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, also known as the “exit price.” Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. The Partnership’s financial assets and financial liabilities recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820, with the related amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to value these assets and liabilities at fair value for each level, are as follows:

Level I – Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

The types of assets categorized as Level I generally are government and agency obligations, including U.S. treasuries, investments in publicly traded mutual funds and money market funds with quoted market prices, equities listed in active markets, client fractional share ownership assets and client fractional share redemption obligations.

54


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Level II – Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level I) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with related market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life. The Partnership uses the market approach valuation technique which incorporates third-party pricing services and other relevant observable information (such as market interest rates, yield curves, prepayment risk and credit risk generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities) in valuing these types of investments. When third-party pricing services are used, the methods and assumptions used are reviewed by the Partnership.

The types of assets categorized as Level II generally are certificates of deposit, municipal obligations and corporate bonds and notes.

Level III – Inputs are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the inputs to the model.

The Partnership did not have any assets or liabilities categorized as Level III during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the purchase date to be cash equivalents.

Cash and Investments Segregated under Federal Regulations. Cash, investments and interest receivable related to the investments are segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

Collateral. The Partnership does not report collateral it has received in secured lending and other arrangements as an asset when the debtor has the right to redeem or substitute the collateral on short notice.

Fractional Shares. Clients may receive fractional share interests through the Partnership's dividend reinvestment and dollar cost averaging programs. The Partnership records these fractional shares, which are considered encumbered assets, at fair value in other assets with associated liabilities in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as the Partnership must fulfill its clients' future fractional share redemptions. The liabilities are initially recorded at the dollar amount received from the clients, but the Partnership makes an election to record the liabilities at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the assets and liabilities offset in other revenue (loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income, with no impact on income before allocations to partners.

Securities Owned. Securities owned, primarily consisting of investment securities, are recorded on a trade-date basis at fair value which is determined by using quoted market or dealer prices. Investment securities, which are primarily held to generate income, also assist in the management of firm liquidity. The unrealized gains and losses for investment securities are recorded in other revenue (loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Partnership records the related unrealized gains and losses for inventory securities in trade revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fixed Assets. Fixed Assets include buildings and leasehold improvements, equipment, software, and land. Buildings are depreciated using the straight-line method over their useful lives, which are estimated at thirty years. Leasehold improvements are amortized based on the term of the lease or the economic useful life of the improvement, whichever is less. Equipment, including furniture and fixtures, is recorded at cost and depreciated using straight-line and accelerated methods over estimated useful lives of three to seven years. Software includes purchased software licenses and internally developed software. Internally developed software consists of labor and consulting costs to develop and implement new software or modify existing software to improve functionality for the Partnership's internal use, while costs in other project phases are expensed as incurred. Software is depreciated using the straight-line method over its useful life, which is estimated at three to five years. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged against income as incurred, whereas significant enhancements are capitalized and depreciated once the asset is placed into service. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the respective category and any related gain or loss is recorded as other revenue (loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

55


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Fixed assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of the asset may not be fully recoverable. If impairment is indicated, the asset value is written down to its fair value.

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. The Partnership has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain financial advisors. The Partnership has recorded a liability of $235 for the future payments due to financial advisors participating in the plan. As the future amounts due to financial advisors change in accordance with plan requirements, the Partnership records the change in future amounts owed to financial advisors as an increase or decrease in accrued compensation in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and compensation and benefits expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Partnership has chosen to economically hedge this future liability by purchasing securities in an amount similar to the future liability expected to be due in accordance with the plan. These securities are included in investment securities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and the unrealized gains and losses are recorded in other revenue (loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Each period, the net impact of the change in future amounts owed to financial advisors in the plan and the change in value of the investment securities are approximately the same, resulting in minimal net impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Retirement Transition Plans. The Partnership, in certain circumstances, offers individually tailored retirement transition plans to retiring financial advisors. Each retirement transition plan compensates a retiring financial advisor for successfully providing client transition services in accordance with a retirement and transition agreement. Generally, the retirement and transition agreement is for five years. During the first two years the retiring financial advisor remains an employee and provides client transition services, which include, but are not limited to, the successful transition of client accounts and assets to successor financial advisors, as well as mentoring and providing training and support to successor financial advisors. The financial advisor retires at the end of year two and is subject to a non-compete agreement for three years. Most retiring financial advisors participating in a retirement transition plan are paid ratably over four years. Compensation expense is generally recognized ratably over the two-year transition period which aligns with the service period of most agreements, with compensation expense related to some plans recognized over one year depending on the size and complexity of the transition plan. As of December 31, 2022, $113 was accrued for future payments to financial advisors who have already started a plan, approximately $60 of which is expected to be paid in 2023. As of December 31, 2021, $112 was accrued.Successor financial advisors in the program as of December 31, 2022 receive reduced compensation on transitioned assets for up to four years.

Lease Accounting.The Partnership leases branch office space under numerous operating leases from non-affiliates and financial advisors. Branch offices are generally leased for terms of five years and generally contain a renewal option. Renewal options are not included in the lease term if it is not reasonably certain the Partnership will exercise the renewal option. The Partnership also leases a home office space and land from non-affiliates with terms ranging from 12 to 30 years.

The Partnership recognizes lease liabilities for future lease payments and lease right-of-use assets for the right of use of an underlying asset within a contract. Current leases are all classified as operating leases. Lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at commencement date and calculated as the present value of the sum of the remaining fixed lease payments over the lease term. Throughout the lease term, the lease right-of-use asset includes the impact from the timing of lease payments and straight-line rent expense. The Partnership used its incremental borrowing rate based on information available at lease commencement as leases do not contain a readily determinable implicit rate. A single lease cost, or rent expense, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Partnership does not separate lease components (i.e., fixed payments including rent, real estate taxes and insurance costs) from non-lease components (i.e., common-area maintenance) and recognizes them as a single lease component. Variable lease payments not included within lease contracts are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 for additional information.

Income Taxes. Generally, income taxes have not been provided for in the Consolidated Financial Statements due to the partnership tax structure where each partner is liable for their own tax payments. For the jurisdictions in which the Partnership is liable for tax payments, the income tax provisions are immaterial (see Note 11).

Partnership Capital Subject to Mandatory Redemption. FASB ASC No. 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”), established standards for classifying and measuring certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Under the provisions of ASC 480, the obligation to redeem a partner’s capital in the event of a partner’s death is one of the criteria requiring capital to be classified as a liability.

56


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Since the Partnership Agreement obligates the Partnership to redeem a partner’s capital after a partner’s death, ASC 480 requires all of the Partnership’s equity capital to be classified as a liability. In accordance with ASC 480, income allocable to limited, subordinated limited and general partners is classified as a reduction of income before allocations to partners, which results in a presentation of zero net income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017, respectively, from one mutual fund company.2020. The revenue generated from this company relatesfinancial statement presentations required to business conductedcomply with ASC 480 do not alter the Partnership’s treatment of income, income allocations or capital for any other purposes.

Net Income, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, is equivalent to income before allocations to partners on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Such income, if any, for each calendar year is allocated to the Partnership’s three classes of capital in accordance with the formulas prescribed in the Partnership Agreement. Income allocations are based upon partner capital contributions including capital contributions financed with loans from the Partnership. First, limited partners are allocated Net Income in accordance with the prescribed formula for their share of net income. Limited partners generally do not share in the Net Loss, as defined in the Partnership agreement, in any year in which there is a net loss and the Partnership is not dissolved or liquidated. Thereafter, subordinated limited partners and general partners are allocated any remaining Net Income or Net Loss based on formulas as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

The limited partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is held by current and former associates and general partners of the Partnership. Limited partners participate in the Partnership’s U.S. segment.profits and are paid a minimum 7.5% annual return on the face amount of their capital (see Note 9) in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.

NOTE 4 – RECEIVABLE FROM AND PAYABLE TO CLIENTSThe subordinated limited partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is held by current and former general partners of the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners receive a percentage of the Partnership’s Net Income determined in accordance with the Partnership Agreement. The subordinated limited partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is subordinated to the limited partnership capital.

ReceivableThe general partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is held by current general partners of the Partnership. General partners receive a percentage of the Partnership’s Net Income determined in accordance with the Partnership Agreement. The general partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is subordinated to the limited partnership capital and the subordinated limited partnership capital.

Current Expected Credit Losses. The Partnership individually assessed the current expected credit loss for the assets below.

Receivables from Clients

Receivables from clients is primarily composed of margin loan balances. The value of securities owned by clients and held as collateral for these receivables is not reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Collateral held as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 was $3,915$5,094 and $4,076,$4,803, respectively, and was not repledged or sold. The Partnership considers these financing receivables to be of good credit quality due to the fact that these receivables are primarily collateralized by the related client investmentsinvestments.

To estimate expected credit losses on margin loans, the Partnership applied the collateral maintenance practical expedient by comparing the amortized cost basis of the margin loans with the fair value of collateral at the reporting date. Margin loans are limited to a fraction of the total value of the securities held in the client's account against those loans upon issuance in accordance with Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules. In the event of a decline in the market value of the securities in a margin account, the Partnership requires the client to deposit additional securities or cash (or to sell a sufficient amount of securities) so that, at all times, the loan to the client is no greater than 65% of the value of the securities in the account, which is a more stringent maintenance requirement than FINRA Rule 4210. As such, the Partnership reasonably expects that the borrower will be able to continually replenish collateral securing the financial asset and does not expect the fair value of collateral to fall below the value of margin loans and, as a result, the Partnership considers credit risk related to these receivables to be minimal. The fair value of collateral was higher than the amortized cost basis for virtually all margin loans as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the expected credit loss for those loans was zero for each period. In limited circumstances, a margin loan may become undercollateralized. When this occurs, the Partnership records a reserve for the undercollateralized portion of the loan, which was an immaterial amount as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

57


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell

The Partnership participates in short-term resale agreements collateralized by government and agency securities. These transactions are reported as collateralized financing and are carried at contractual cost with accrued interest in receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies and other within the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The fair value of the underlying collateral, plus accrued interest, must equal or exceed 102% of the carrying amount of the transaction in U.S. agreements and must equal or exceed 100% of the carrying amount of the transaction in Canada agreements. In the event that the fair value of the collateral does not meet the contractual minimums, the counterparty is obligated to meet any shortfall promptly. It is the Partnership’s policy to have such underlying resale agreement collateral delivered to the Partnership or deposited in its accounts at its custodian banks. The fair value of the collateral related to these agreements was $441 and $1,526 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and was not repledged or sold.

To estimate expected credit losses on the resale agreements, the Partnership applied the collateral maintenance practical expedient by comparing the amortized cost basis of the resale agreements with the fair value of collateral at the reporting date. The counterparties are all financial institutions that the Partnership considers to be reputable and reliable, and the Partnership reasonably expects the counterparties will be able to continually replenish collateral securing the financial asset and does not expect the fair value of collateral to fall below the value of the resale agreements frequently or for an extended period of time. The expected credit loss was zero for each period.

Partnership Loans

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions as discussed in more detail in Note 9. General partners and subordinated limited partners must repay any amount of principal and interest outstanding on their Partnership loans prior to receiving a return of their Partnership capital. The loan value never exceeds the value of capital allocated to the partner, and there has been no historical loss on Partnership loans. As such, the risk of loss is remote, and the expected credit loss was zero as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Receivables from Revenue Contracts with Customers

The majority of the Partnership's receivables are collateralized financial assets, including advisory program fees, retirement fees, mutual fund and insurance service fees, and fund adviser fees, because the fees are paid out of client accounts or third-party products consisting of cash and securities. Due to the size of the fees in relation to the value of the cash and securities in accounts or funds, the collateral value always exceeds the amortized cost basis of the receivables, resulting in a remote risk of loss. In addition, the receivables have a short duration, generally due within 30 to 90 days, and there is no historical evidence of market declines that would cause the fair value of the underlying collateral to decline below the amortized cost of the receivables. The Partnership considered current conditions, and there is not a foreseeable expectation of an event or change which would result in the receivables being undercollateralized or unpaid. The expected credit loss for receivables from revenue contracts with customers was zero as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

NOTE 2 – LEASES

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $326 and $322, respectively, and lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities was $330 and $325, respectively. The weighted-average remaining lease term was four years as of both December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the weighted-average discount rate was 2.6% and 2.1%, respectively.

The following table summarizes the Partnership's operating lease cost, variable lease cost not included in the lease liability and total lease cost for the years ended December 31:

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Lease Costs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease cost

 

$

328

 

 

$

319

 

 

$

304

 

Variable lease cost

 

 

61

 

 

 

58

 

 

 

57

 

Total lease cost

 

$

389

 

 

$

377

 

 

$

360

 

58


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

The Partnership's future undiscounted cash outflows for operating leases are summarized below as of December 31:

 

2022

 

2023

$

310

 

2024

 

249

 

2025

 

188

 

2026

 

130

 

2027

 

68

 

Thereafter

 

69

 

Total lease payments

 

1,014

 

Less: Interest

 

56

 

Total present value of lease liabilities

$

958

 

While the rights and obligations for leases that have not yet commenced are not significant, the Partnership regularly enters into new branch office leases.

NOTE 3 – REVENUE

The following tables show the Partnership's disaggregated revenue information for the years ended December 31:

2022

 

U.S.

 

 

Canada

 

 

Total

 

Fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory programs fees

 

$

7,237

 

 

$

147

 

 

$

7,384

 

Service fees

 

 

1,405

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

1,512

 

Other asset-based fees

 

 

912

 

 

 

 

 

 

912

 

Total asset-based fee revenue

 

 

9,554

 

 

 

254

 

 

 

9,808

 

Account and activity fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder accounting services fees

 

 

454

 

 

 

 

 

 

454

 

Other account and activity fee revenue

 

 

225

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

238

 

Total account and activity fee revenue

 

 

679

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

692

 

Total fee revenue

 

 

10,233

 

 

 

267

 

 

 

10,500

 

Trade revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions

 

 

1,273

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

1,318

 

Principal transactions

 

 

158

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

166

 

Total trade revenue

 

 

1,431

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

1,484

 

Total revenue from customers

 

 

11,664

 

 

 

320

 

 

 

11,984

 

Net interest and dividends and other revenue

 

 

238

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

285

 

Net revenue

 

$

11,902

 

 

$

367

 

 

$

12,269

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

2021

 

U.S.

 

 

Canada

 

 

Total

 

Fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory programs fees

 

$

7,293

 

 

$

128

 

 

$

7,421

 

Service fees

 

 

1,563

 

 

 

113

 

 

 

1,676

 

Other asset-based fees

 

 

640

 

 

 

 

 

 

640

 

Total asset-based fee revenue

 

 

9,496

 

 

 

241

 

 

 

9,737

 

Account and activity fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder accounting services fees

 

 

436

 

 

 

 

 

 

436

 

Other account and activity fee revenue

 

 

237

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

251

 

Total account and activity fee revenue

 

 

673

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

687

 

   Total fee revenue

 

 

10,169

 

 

 

255

 

 

 

10,424

 

Trade revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions

 

 

1,627

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

1,679

 

Principal transactions

 

 

37

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

40

 

Total trade revenue

 

 

1,664

 

 

 

55

 

 

 

1,719

 

Total revenue from customers

 

 

11,833

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

12,143

 

Net interest and dividends and other revenue

 

 

113

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

136

 

Net revenue

 

$

11,946

 

 

$

333

 

 

$

12,279

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

U.S.

 

 

Canada

 

 

Total

 

Fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset-based fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advisory programs fees

 

$

5,452

 

 

$

85

 

 

$

5,537

 

Service fees

 

 

1,298

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

1,387

 

Other asset-based fees

 

 

591

 

 

 

 

 

 

591

 

Total asset-based fee revenue

 

 

7,341

 

 

 

174

 

 

 

7,515

 

Account and activity fee revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder accounting services fees

 

 

424

 

 

 

 

 

 

424

 

Other account and activity fee revenue

 

 

224

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

236

 

Total account and activity fee revenue

 

 

648

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

660

 

   Total fee revenue

 

 

7,989

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

8,175

 

Trade revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions

 

 

1,611

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

1,660

 

Principal transactions

 

 

56

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

59

 

Total trade revenue

 

 

1,667

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

1,719

 

Total revenue from customers

 

 

9,656

 

 

 

238

 

 

 

9,894

 

Net interest and dividends and other revenue

 

 

149

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

169

 

Net revenue

 

$

9,805

 

 

$

258

 

 

$

10,063

 

60


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

The Partnership derived 11%, 12% and 13% of its total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, from one mutual fund company. The revenue generated from this company primarily relates to business conducted with the Partnership’s U.S. segment.

NOTE 4 – RECEIVABLES

As of December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, $637, $695 and $563, respectively, of the receivable from clients balance related to revenue contracts with customers.

The following table shows the Partnership's receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies and other as of December 31:

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Deposit for Canadian retirement accounts

 

$

451

 

 

$

459

 

Fees from mutual funds and insurance companies

 

 

328

 

 

 

335

 

Other receivables

 

 

71

 

 

 

56

 

Total

 

$

850

 

 

$

850

 

The deposit for Canadian retirement accounts is required by Canadian regulations. The Partnership is required to hold deposits with a trustee for clients’ retirement funds held in Canada.

The receivable from mutual funds and insurance companies is related to revenue contracts with customers. The balance was $285 as of December 31, 2020.

NOTE 5 – PAYABLE TO CLIENTS

Payable to clients is composed of cash amounts held by the Partnership due to clients. Substantially all amounts payable to clients are subject to withdrawal upon client request. The Partnership pays interest, which was 0.85% as of December 31, 2022 and 0.01% as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, on the vast majority of credit balances in client accounts at varying rates.accounts. The total interest paid to clients for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 was $62, $58$50, $2 and $23,$9, respectively.

As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, $470, $377 and $346, respectively, of the receivable from clients balance related to revenue contracts with customers.

NOTE 5 – RECEIVABLE FROM MUTUAL FUNDS, INSURANCE COMPANIES AND OTHER

The following table shows the Partnership's receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies and other as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Deposit for Canadian retirement accounts

 

$

326

 

 

$

273

 

Fees from mutual fund and insurance companies

 

 

291

 

 

 

278

 

Other receivables

 

 

44

 

 

 

4

 

Total

 

$

661

 

 

$

555

 

5961


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

The deposit for Canadian retirement accounts is required by Canadian regulations.  The Partnership is required to hold deposits with a trustee for clients’ retirement funds held in Canada.

The receivable from mutual fund and insurance companies is related to revenue contracts with customers. The balance was $279 as of December 31, 2017.

NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE

The following tables show the Partnership's financial instruments measured at fair value:

 

 

Financial Assets at Fair Value as of

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Total

 

Cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

$

 

 

$

326

 

 

$

 

 

$

326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments segregated under federal regulations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

3,394

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mutual funds(1)

 

$

328

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

328

 

Government and agency obligations

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Equities

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Corporate bonds and notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investment securities

 

$

332

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

332

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 

$

18

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

18

 

State and municipal obligations

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

Corporate bonds and notes

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Mutual funds

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Total inventory securities

 

$

20

 

 

$

30

 

 

$

 

 

$

50

 

60


PART II

Item 8.Financial8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

 

 

Financial Assets at Fair Value as of

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Total

 

Cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

$

 

 

$

298

 

 

$

 

 

$

298

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments segregated under federal regulations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

998

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

998

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mutual funds(1)

 

$

244

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

244

 

Government and agency obligations

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Equities

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Corporate bonds and notes

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Total investment securities

 

$

249

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

 

 

$

250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 

$

16

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

16

 

State and municipal obligations

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

Mutual funds

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Corporate bonds and notes

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Total inventory securities

 

$

22

 

 

$

21

 

 

$

 

 

$

43

 

NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE

(1)

The mutual funds balance consists primarily of securities held to economically hedge future liabilities related to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The balance also includes securities held in relation to profit sharing contributions on behalf of service partners and a security held for regulatory purposes at the Trust Co.

The following tables show the Partnership's financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value:

 

 

Fair Value as of

 

 

 

December 31, 2022

 

 

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

$

 

 

$

144

 

 

$

 

 

$

144

 

Money market funds

 

 

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49

 

Total cash equivalents

 

$

49

 

 

$

144

 

 

$

 

 

$

193

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments segregated under federal regulations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

10,327

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

10,327

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

Total investments segregated under federal regulations

 

$

10,327

 

 

$

1,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

11,327

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government and agency obligations

 

$

1,000

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,000

 

Mutual funds(1)

 

 

310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

310

 

Municipal obligations

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

Equities

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

Total investment securities

 

$

1,318

 

 

$

11

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,329

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal obligations

 

$

 

 

$

28

 

 

$

 

 

$

28

 

Corporate bonds and notes

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

Equities

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

Mutual funds

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

Government and agency obligations

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Total inventory securities

 

$

27

 

 

$

49

 

 

$

 

 

$

76

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Client fractional share ownership assets

 

$

680

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

680

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Client fractional share redemption obligations

 

$

680

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

680

 

62


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

 

 

Fair Value as of

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

 

Level I

 

 

Level II

 

 

Level III

 

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

$

 

 

$

266

 

 

$

 

 

$

266

 

Money market funds

 

 

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47

 

Total cash equivalents

 

$

47

 

 

$

266

 

 

$

 

 

$

313

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments segregated under federal regulations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

13,908

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

13,908

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

Total investments segregated under federal regulations

 

$

13,908

 

 

$

400

 

 

$

 

 

$

14,308

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities owned:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government and agency obligations

 

$

413

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

413

 

Mutual funds(1)

 

 

366

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

366

 

Equities

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

Total investment securities

 

$

782

 

 

$

70

 

 

$

 

 

$

852

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 

$

18

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

18

 

Municipal obligations

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Corporate bonds and notes

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Mutual funds

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Total inventory securities

 

$

20

 

 

$

18

 

 

$

 

 

$

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Client fractional share ownership assets

 

$

710

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

710

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Client fractional share redemption obligations

 

$

710

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

710

 

(1)
The mutual funds balance consists primarily of securities held to economically hedge future liabilities for the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The balance also includes a security held for regulatory purposes at the Trust Co.

NOTE 7 – EQUIPMENT, PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTSFIXED ASSETS

The following table shows equipment, property and improvementsthe Partnership's fixed assets as of December 31, 201931:

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

 

$

1,178

 

 

$

1,115

 

Equipment, furniture and fixtures

 

 

670

 

 

 

598

 

Software

 

 

442

 

 

 

295

 

Land

 

 

48

 

 

 

47

 

Fixed assets, at cost

 

 

2,338

 

 

 

2,055

 

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

 

1,295

 

 

 

1,192

 

Less: accumulated software amortization

 

 

181

 

 

 

138

 

Fixed assets, net

 

$

862

 

 

$

725

 

63


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and 2018:Supplementary Data, continued

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Buildings and improvements

 

$

1,012

 

 

$

978

 

Equipment, furniture and fixtures

 

 

713

 

 

 

658

 

Land

 

 

43

 

 

 

27

 

Equipment, property and improvements, at cost

 

 

1,768

 

 

 

1,663

 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,152

 

 

 

1,108

 

Equipment, property and improvements, net

 

$

616

 

 

$

555

 

Depreciation and amortization expense on equipment, property and improvements of $115, $94$126, $113 and $85$116 and amortization expense on software of $43, $16 and $9 is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income within the occupancy and equipment and communications and data processing line items for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively.

The Partnership's weighted average amortization period for software was five years as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

The following table shows the expected future amortization of software, excluding $47 of capitalized software costs not yet placed in service that will be amortized in future periods as of December 31:

 

2022

 

2023

$

56

 

2024

 

55

 

2025

 

51

 

2026

 

39

 

2027

 

13

 

Total

$

214

 

The Partnership's capital expenditures were $176, $105$302, $234 and $80$129 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively. The capital expenditures in 20192022 were primarily related to constructionsoftware and other technology and facilities improvements in branch offices and headquarters, as well as for technology support.offices.

The Partnership purchased Industrial Revenue Bonds issued by St. Louis County related to certain self-constructed and purchased real and personal property for potential property tax benefits over the life of the bonds (generally 10 years). The bonds matured in December 2019.  The Partnership was therefore both the bondholder and the debtor/lessee for these properties while the bonds were held.  The Partnership exercised its right to offset the amounts invested in and the

61


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

obligations for these bonds and therefore excluded any bond related balances in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.  The amount issued as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $0 and $270, respectively.

NOTE 8 – LINES OF CREDIT

The following table shows the composition of the Partnership's aggregate bank lines of credit in place as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:31:

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

2022 Credit Facility

 

$

500

 

 

$

 

2018 Credit Facility

 

$

500

 

 

$

500

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

Uncommitted secured credit facilities

 

 

290

 

 

 

290

 

 

 

390

 

 

 

390

 

Total bank lines of credit

 

$

790

 

 

$

790

 

 

$

890

 

 

$

890

 

In accordance withSeptember 2018, the terms of the Partnership's $500Partnership entered into a $500 committed revolving line of credit (the "2018 Credit Facility"). In October 2022, the Partnership entered into in Septembera new $500 committed revolving line of credit (the "2022 Credit Facility"), which replaced the 2018 Credit Facility and has an October 2027 expiration date. In accordance with the terms of the 2022 Credit Facility, the Partnership is required to maintain a leverage ratio of no more than 35%35% and minimum Partnership capital, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals and Partnership loans, of at least $1,884.$2,809. In addition, Edward Jones is required to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of at least $1,344$1,435 and minimum regulatory net capital of at least 6%6% of aggregate debit items as calculated under the alternative method. The Partnership has the ability to draw on various types of loans. The associated interest rate depends on the type of loan, duration of the loan, whether the loan is secured or unsecured and the amount of leverage. Rates include the federal fundsContractual rates are based on an index rate plus the applicable rate, eurodollar rate plus the applicable rate, and the Alternative Base Rate plus the applicable rate.spread. The 20182022 Credit Facility is intended to provide short-term liquidity to the Partnership should the need arise. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership was in compliance with all covenants related to the 20182022 Credit Facility.

In addition, the Partnership has multiple uncommitted lines of credit, including $290 of uncommitted secured lines of credit totaling $390 that are subject to change at the discretion of the banks and a newbanks. The Partnership also has an additional uncommitted line of credit entered into in September 2019. Thewhere the amount available on the new line of credit and the associated collateral requirements are at the bank's discretion uponin the event of a borrowing. Based on credit market conditions and the uncommitted nature of these credit facilities, it is possible that these lines of credit could decrease or not be available in the future. Actual borrowing availabilitycapacity on the uncommitted secured lines is based on availability of client margin securities or firm-owned securities, which would serve as collateral on loans in the event the Partnership borrowed against these lines. In February 2020, the Partnership increased the $290 uncommitted lines of credit to $390 with $250 unsecured for up to three days after borrowing.

There were no amounts outstanding on the 2022 Credit Facility and the 2018 Credit Facility as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, or the uncommitted lines of credit as of December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.  In addition, the2022 and 2021. The Partnership did notnot have any draws against these lines of credit during the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, except for periodically testing draw procedures.

64


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 9 – PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the Executive Committee)Enterprise Leadership Team ("ELT"), as defined in the Partnership Agreement) who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions. In limited circumstances, a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while he or shethey still hashave an outstanding Partnership loan. It is anticipated that, of the future general and subordinated limited partnership capital contributions (in each case, other than for Executive CommitteeELT members) requiring financing, the majority will be financed through Partnership loans. Loans made by the Partnership to such partners are generally for a period of one year but are expected to be renewed and bear interest at the interest rate defined ingreater of the loan documents.Prime Rate for the last business day of the prior fiscal month or 3.25% per annum. The Partnership recognizes interest income for the interest earned related to these loans. The outstanding amount of Partnership loans is reflected as a reduction to total Partnership capital. As of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the outstanding amount of Partnership loans was $360$335 and $332,$321, respectively. Interest income earned from these loans, which is included in interest and dividends in the Consolidated Statements of Income, was $21, $17$18, $13 and $13$14 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively.

62


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

The following table shows the roll forward of outstanding Partnership loans for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:31:

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Partnership loans outstanding at beginning of year

 

$

332

 

 

$

297

 

 

$

321

 

 

$

341

 

Partnership loans issued during the year

 

 

164

 

 

 

170

 

 

 

276

 

 

 

222

 

Repayment of Partnership loans during the year

 

 

(136

)

 

 

(135

)

 

 

(262

)

 

 

(242

)

Total Partnership loans outstanding

 

$

360

 

 

$

332

 

 

$

335

 

 

$

321

 

The minimum 7.5%7.5% annual return on the face amount of limited partnership capital was $94, $67$91, $92 and $67$93 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively. These amounts are included as a component of interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January 12, 2018,December 8, 2021, to register $450$700 of Interests issuable pursuant to the Partnership's 2021 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2021 Plan"). In early 2023, the Partnership issued $568 of Interests under the 2021 Plan. Proceeds from the offering under the 2021 Plan are expected to be used to meet growth needs or for other purposes. The remaining $132 may be issued at the discretion of the Managing Partner in the future. In November 2022, the Partnership deregistered the remaining $60 of unsold Interests under its 2018 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2018 Plan").  The Partnership issued approximately $380 and $1 of Interests under the 2018 Plan on January 2, 2019 and January 2, 2020, respectively. The remaining $69 of Interests may be issued under the Plan at the discretion of the Managing Partner in the future.  

NOTE 10 – NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

As a result of its activities as a U.S. broker-dealer, Edward Jones is subject to the net capital provisions of Rule 15c3-1 of the Exchange Act and capital compliance rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”)FINRA Rule 4110. Under the alternative method permitted by the rules, Edward Jones must maintain minimum net capital equal to the greater of $0.25$0.25 or 2%2% of aggregate debit items arising from client transactions. The net capital rules also provide that Edward Jones’ partnership capital may not be withdrawn if resulting net capital would be less than minimum requirements. Additionally, certain withdrawals require the approval of the SEC and FINRA to the extent they exceed defined levels, even though such withdrawals would not cause net capital to be less than minimum requirements.

The Partnership’sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is a registered broker-dealer regulated in 2022 by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (“IIROC”("IIROC"). Effective January 1, 2023, IIROC was amalgamated into the New Self-Regulatory Organization of Canada (“New SRO”) and IIROC's rules were replaced by New SRO's rules. Under the regulations prescribed by IIROC the Partnership'sas of December 31, 2022 and New SRO currently, EJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiarywas and is required to maintain minimum levels of risk-adjusted capital, which are dependent on the nature of the Partnership's Canada broker-dealer subsidiary’sEJ Canada's assets and operations.

The following table shows the Partnership’s capital figures for its U.S. and Canada broker-dealer subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

U.S.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net capital

 

$

1,244

 

 

$

1,280

 

Net capital in excess of the minimum required

 

$

1,188

 

 

$

1,221

 

Net capital as a percentage of aggregate debit items

 

 

44.2

%

 

 

43.6

%

Net capital after anticipated capital withdrawals, as a

   percentage of aggregate debit items

 

 

26.4

%

 

 

28.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regulatory risk-adjusted capital

 

$

40

 

 

$

40

 

Regulatory risk-adjusted capital in excess of the

   minimum required to be held by IIROC

 

$

38

 

 

$

39

 

U.S. net capital, Canada regulatory risk-adjusted capital and the related capital percentages may fluctuate on a daily basis. In addition, Trust Co. was in compliance with its regulatory capital requirements.

6365


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES

The Partnership is a pass-through entity for federal and state income tax purposes and generally does not incur income taxes.  Instead, its earnings and losses are included in the income tax returns of the general, subordinated limited and limited partners.  However, the Partnership's structure does include certain subsidiaries which are corporations that are subject to income tax.  As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership's tax basis of net assets and liabilities exceeds the book basis by $303 and $300, respectively.  The primary difference between financial statement basis and tax basis is related to the deferral for tax purposes in deducting accrued expenses until they are paid.  Since the Partnership is treated as a pass-through entity for federal and state income tax purposes, the difference between the tax basis and the book basis of assets and liabilities will impact the future tax liabilities of the partners.  The tax differences will not impact the net income of the Partnership.

FASB ASC No. 740, Income Taxes, requires the Partnership to determine whether, upon review by the applicable taxing authority, each of its income tax positions has a likelihood of being realized that is greater than fifty percent, which could result in the Partnership recording a tax liability that would reduce Partnership capital.  The Partnership did not have any significant uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and is not aware of any tax positions that will significantly change during the next twelve months.  The Partnership and its subsidiaries are generally subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and by various state and foreign taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Partnership and its subsidiaries conduct business.  Tax years prior to 2016 are generally no longer subject to examination by the IRS, state, local or foreign tax authorities.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

The following table shows the capital figures for the U.S. and Canada broker-dealers as of December 31:

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

U.S.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net capital

 

$

1,038

 

 

$

1,306

 

Net capital in excess of the minimum required

 

$

965

 

 

$

1,248

 

Net capital as a percentage of aggregate debit items

 

 

28.4

%

 

 

45.0

%

Net capital after anticipated capital withdrawals, as a
   percentage of aggregate debit items

 

 

13.3

%

 

 

23.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regulatory risk-adjusted capital

 

$

103

 

 

$

56

 

Regulatory risk-adjusted capital in excess of the
   minimum required

 

$

102

 

 

$

47

 

U.S. net capital, Canada regulatory risk-adjusted capital and the related capital percentages may fluctuate on a daily basis.

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES

The Partnership is a pass-through entity for federal and state income tax purposes and generally does not incur income taxes. Instead, its earnings and losses are included in the income tax returns of the general, subordinated limited and limited partners. However, the Partnership's structure does include certain subsidiaries which are corporations that are subject to income tax. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Partnership's tax basis of net assets and liabilities exceeds the book basis by $241 and $168, respectively. The primary difference between financial statement basis and tax basis is related to the deferral for tax purposes in deducting accrued expenses until they are paid. Since the Partnership is treated as a pass-through entity for federal and state income tax purposes, the difference between the tax basis and the book basis of assets and liabilities will impact the future tax liabilities of the partners. The tax differences will not impact the net income of the Partnership.

FASB ASC No. 740, Income Taxes, requires the Partnership to determine whether, upon review by the applicable taxing authority, each of its income tax positions has a likelihood of being realized that is greater than fifty percent, which could result in the Partnership recording a tax liability that would reduce Partnership capital. The Partnership did not have any significant uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and is not aware of any tax positions that will significantly change during the next twelve months. The Partnership and its subsidiaries are generally subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and by various state and foreign taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Partnership and its subsidiaries conduct business. Tax years prior to 2019 are generally no longer subject to examination by the IRS, state, local or foreign tax authorities.

NOTE 12 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Partnership maintains a profit sharing and 401(k) plan covering all eligible U.S. employees, U.S. general partners and service partners, a Group Registered Retirement Savings Plan covering all eligible EJ Canada employees and Canadian general partners, and a Deferred Profit Sharing Plan covering all eligible EJ Canada employees. The Partnership contributed approximately $213, $197$263, $286 and $178$249 in total to these plans in early 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017, respectively.2020.

As of December 31, 2019,In addition to the contribution above, the Partnership withheld $32 in future mandatory profit sharing contributions from service partners that will be contributed approximately $48, $39 and $36 to the profit sharing plan in early 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, applying mandatory profit sharing contributions that were withheld from service partners during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

66


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND RISKS

As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership would be subject to termination fees of approximately $114$426 in the event the Partnership terminated existing contractual commitments with certain vendors providing ongoing services primarily for information technology to support the Partnership's strategic initiatives, in addition to services for operations and marketing. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership made no such decision to terminate these services. These termination fees will decrease over the related contract periods, which generally expire within the next three years.  years.

As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership also has a revolving unsecured line of credit available (see Note 8).

The Partnership provides margin loans to its clients in accordance with Federal Reserve Board Regulation T and FINRA Rule 4210, under which loans are collateralized by securities in client accounts (see Note 4).accounts. The Partnership could be liable for the margin requirement of its client margin securities transactions.  To mitigate this risk, the Partnership monitors required margin levels and requires clients to deposit additional collateral or reduce positions to meet minimum collateral requirements.requirements (see Note 1).

The Partnership's securities activities involve execution, settlement and financing of various securities transactions for clients. The Partnership may be exposed to risk of loss in the event clients, other brokers and dealers, banks, depositories or clearing organizations are unable to fulfill contractual obligations. The Partnership has controls in place to ensure client activity is monitored and to mitigate the risk of clients' inability to meet their obligations to the Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership considers its potential to make payments under these client transactions to be remote and accordingly, no liability has been recognized for these transactions.


64


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Cash balances held at various major U.S. financial institutions, which typically exceed Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationFDIC insurance coverage limits, subject the Partnership to a concentration of credit risk. Additionally, the Partnership'sEJ Canada broker-dealer subsidiary may also have cash deposits in excess of the applicable insured amounts. The Partnership regularly monitors the credit ratings of these financial institutions in order to help mitigate the credit risk that exists with the deposits in excess of insured amounts. The Partnership has credit exposure to U.S. government and agency securities which are held as collateral forthrough its resell agreements, investment securities, investments segregated under federal regulations and segregated investments.collateral held for resell agreements. The Partnership's primary exposure on resell agreements is with the counterparty and the Partnership would only have exposure to U.S. government and agency credit risk in the event of the counterparty's default on the resell agreements.agreements (see Note 1).

The Partnership provides guarantees to securities clearing houses and exchanges under their standard membership agreements, which require a member to guarantee the performance of other members. Under these agreements, if a member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearing houses and exchanges, all other members would be required to meet any shortfall. The Partnership's liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable and may exceed the cash and securities it has posted as collateral. However, the Partnership considers the likelihood that the Partnership will be required to make payments under these agreements to be remote. Accordingly, no liability has been recognized for these transactions.

NOTE 14 – CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of its business, the Partnership is involved, from time to time, in various legal and regulatory matters, including arbitrations, class actions, other litigation, and examinations, investigations and proceedings by governmental authorities, self-regulatory organizations and other regulators, which may result in losses. These matters include:

Mutual Fund Share Class Waivers. As previously disclosed, on October 26, 2015, Edward Jones, without admitting or denying the findings, entered into a settlement agreement with FINRA in connection with its investigation of possible violations of the federal securities laws or rules with respect to mutual fund purchases and sales charge waivers for certain retirement plan and charitable organization accounts.  On June 12, 2015, the Division of Enforcement of the SEC informed Edward Jones that it is also investigating this matter.  The SEC’s review is ongoing.  Consistent with its practice, Edward Jones is cooperating fully with the SEC with respect to its investigation.

Retirement Plan Litigation. On August 19, 2016, JFC, Edward Jones and certain other defendants were named in a putative class action lawsuit (McDonald v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, by a participant in the Edward D. Jones & Co. Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (the "Retirement Plan").  The lawsuit alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Retirement Plan participants and seeks declaratory and equitable relief and monetary damages on behalf of the Retirement Plan.  The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the McDonald lawsuit which was granted in part dismissing the claim against JFC, and denied in part as to all other defendants on January 26, 2017.

On November 11, 2016, a substantially similar lawsuit (Schultz, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) was filed in the same court.  The plaintiffs consolidated the two lawsuits by adding the Schultz plaintiffs to the McDonald case, and the Schultz action was dismissed.  The plaintiffs filed their first amended consolidated complaint on April 28, 2017. On December 13, 2018, the court entered a preliminary order approving a class action settlement agreement reached among the parties. Following a fairness hearing held on April 18, 2019, the court entered judgment on April 22, 2019 in which it granted final approval of the settlement, effected a full release of claims by the settlement class in favor of the defendants, and dismissed the consolidated lawsuit with prejudice.  On June 14, 2019, the lone objector filed an appeal to the judgment approving the settlement. On January 31, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied the appeal and affirmed the district court's approval of the class action settlement and denied the objector's appeal.  On February 6, 2020, the objector petitioned the Court of Appeals for a rehearing, which was denied on March 3, 2020.

Wage-and-Hour Class Action. On March 13, 2018, JFC and Edward Jones were named as defendants in a purported collective and class action lawsuit (Bland, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P, et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by four former financial advisors.  The lawsuit was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act as well as Missouri and Illinois law and alleges that the defendants unlawfully attempted torecoup training costs from departing financial advisors and failed to pay all overtime owed to financial advisor trainees among other claims.  The

65


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory and liquidated damages.  JFC and Edward Jones deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend against the allegations in this lawsuit. On March 19, 2019, the court entered an order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss all claims, but permitting the plaintiffs to amend and re-file certain of their claims.  Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on May 3, 2019. Defendants have filed a renewed motion to dismiss that amended complaint.

Securities Class Action. On March 30, 2018, Edward Jones and its affiliated entities and individuals were named as defendants in a putative class action (Anderson, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The lawsuit originally was brought under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act, as well as Missouri and California law and alleges that the defendants inappropriately transitioned client assets from commission-based accounts to fee-based programs. The plaintiffs requested declaratory, equitable, and exemplary relief, and compensatory damages. On July 9, 2019, the district court entered an order dismissing the lawsuit in its entirety without prejudice. On July 29, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, which eliminated certain affiliated entities and individuals as defendants, withdrew the claims under the Securities Act claims, added claims under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Advisers Act"), and certain additional state law claims, and reasserted the remaining claims with modified allegations. In response to the amended complaint, theThe defendants filed a motion to dismiss.  In the plaintiffs' opposition brief filed on September 9, 2019,dismiss, the plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their Investment Advisers Act claims.  On November 12, 2019 the district court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the second amended complaint and entered judgment in favor of defendants.  On December 11, 2019, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of the district court's order dismissing the case.  Edward Jones and its affiliated entities and individuals deny the allegations and intend to continue to vigorously defend this lawsuit on appeal.

Discrimination Class Action.  On May 24, 2018, Edward Jones and JFC were named as defendants in a putative class action lawsuit (Bland v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by a former financial advisor.  An amended complaint was filed on September 24, 2018, under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging that the defendants discriminated against the former financial advisor and financial advisor trainees on the basis of race.  On November 26, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint adding an allegation of discrimination of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The lawsuit seeks equitable and injunctive relief, as well as compensatory and punitive damages.  Edward Jones and JFC deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

Reimbursement Class Action.  On April 25, 2019, Edward Jones and JFC were named as defendants in a putative class action (Watson, et al. v. The Jones Financial Companies L.L.L.P., et al.) filed by two former financial advisors in the Superior Court of the State of California, Sacramento County.  Plaintiffs allege that defendants did not reimburse financial advisors and financial advisor trainees in California for certain categories of business expenses, which plaintiffs allege violates the California Labor Code and California Unfair Competition Law.  The lawsuit seeks damages and restitution as well as attorneys' fees and costs and equitable and injunctive relief.  On February 19, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a motion seeking the court's approval of a proposed class action settlement reached by the parties.  

In addition to these matters, the Partnership provides for potential losses that may arise related to other contingencies. The Partnership assesses its liabilities and contingencies utilizing available information.  The Partnership accrues for potential losses for those matters where it is probable that the Partnership will incur a potential loss to the extent that the amount of such potential loss can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with FASB ASC No. 450, Contingencies.  This liability represents the Partnership’s estimate of the probable loss at December 31, 2019, after considering, among other factors, the progress of each case, the Partnership's experience with other legal and regulatory matters and discussion with legal counsel, and is believed to be sufficient.  The aggregate accrued liability may be adjusted from time to time to reflect any relevant developments.

For such matters where an accrued liability has not been established and the Partnership believes a loss is both reasonably possible and estimable, as well as for matters where an accrued liability has been recorded but for which an exposure to loss in excess of the amount accrued is both reasonably possible and estimable, the current estimated aggregated range of additional possible loss is up to $10 as of December 31, 2019.  This range of reasonably possible loss does not necessarily represent the Partnership's maximum loss exposure as the Partnership was not able to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss for all matters.

6667


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Further, the matters underlying any disclosed estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly.  While the outcome of these matters is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, the Partnership believes that its established liabilities at December 31, 2019 are adequate and the liabilities arising from such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Partnership.  However, based on future developments and the potential unfavorable resolution of these matters, the outcome could be material to the Partnership’s future consolidated operating results for a particular period or periods.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

their Investment Advisers Act claims, and on November 12, 2019, the district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss all other claims. The plaintiffs appealed the district court's dismissal of certain of their state law claims on jurisdictional grounds but did not appeal the dismissal of the remaining claims. On March 4, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of those state law claims. After further appellate proceedings in the Ninth Circuit, defendants filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, which was denied on January 18, 2022. On February 2, 2022, the defendants filed a renewed motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' remaining state law claims. On May 9, 2022, the court dismissed the second amended complaint without prejudice. On May 31, 2022, the plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint alleging a single claim of breach of fiduciary duty under Missouri and California law against a single defendant, Edward Jones, which Edward Jones moved to dismiss on June 21, 2022. The district court denied the motion to dismiss in an order filed on October 26, 2022, and Edward Jones filed its answer to the third amended complaint on November 14, 2022. Edward Jones denies the plaintiffs' allegations and intends to continue to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

Gender and Race Discrimination Class Action. On March 9, 2022, Edward Jones and JFC were named as defendants in a lawsuit (Dixon, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The lawsuit was brought by a current financial advisor as a putative collective action alleging gender discrimination under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and by a former financial advisor as a putative class action alleging race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. On April 25, 2022, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint reasserting the original claims with modified allegations and adding claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 alleging race/national origin, gender, and sexual orientation discrimination on behalf of putative classes of financial advisors. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on May 23, 2022, and on September 15, 2022, the court stayed further proceedings in the case pending a decision on the motion to dismiss. Edward Jones and JFC deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

Home Office Gender Discrimination Class Action. Edward Jones and JFC were named as defendants in a lawsuit brought by a former employee (Zigler v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. et al.) in the Northern District of Illinois. The initial complaint filed on September 1, 2022 alleged putative class and collective claims under the Equal Pay Act of 1963, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Illinois state laws of gender-based wage discrimination against a subset of female home office associates whom the plaintiff described as “home office financial advisor[s]." The plaintiff amended the complaint on November 29, 2022, seeking to expand the putative collective and class definitions to include all female home office associates in any role. Edward Jones and JFC filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on January 6, 2023. Edward Jones and JFC deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

SEC Off-Channel Communications Platforms Investigation. Edward Jones has been responding to requests from the SEC in connection with its publicly reported investigation of compliance by broker-dealers, investment advisers and other financial institutions with recordkeeping requirements. The investigation relates to retention of electronic communications stored on personal devices or messaging platforms that have not been approved by Edward Jones for business use by its employees. Edward Jones is cooperating with the SEC’s investigation.

In addition to these matters, the Partnership provides for potential losses that may arise related to other contingencies. The Partnership assesses its liabilities and contingencies utilizing available information. The Partnership accrues for potential losses for those matters where it is probable that the Partnership will incur a potential loss to the extent that the amount of such potential loss can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with FASB ASC No. 450, Contingencies. This liability represents the Partnership’s estimate of the probable loss as of December 31, 2022, after considering, among other factors, the progress of each case, the Partnership's experience with other legal and regulatory matters and discussion with legal counsel, and is believed to be sufficient. The aggregate accrued liability is recorded within the accounts payable, accrued expenses and other line of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and may be adjusted from time to time to reflect any relevant developments.

For such matters where an accrued liability has not been established and the Partnership believes a loss is both reasonably possible and estimable, as well as for matters where an accrued liability has been recorded but for which an exposure to loss in excess of the amount accrued is both reasonably possible and estimable, the current estimated aggregated range of additional possible loss is up to $7 as of December 31, 2022. This range of reasonably possible loss does not necessarily represent the Partnership's maximum loss exposure as the Partnership was not able to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss for all matters.

68


PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Further, the matters underlying any disclosed estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly. While the outcome of these matters is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, the Partnership believes that its established liabilities as of December 31, 2022 are adequate and the liabilities arising from such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Partnership. However, based on future developments and the potential unfavorable resolution of these matters, the outcome could be material to the Partnership’s future consolidated operating results for a particular period or periods.

NOTE 15 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Partnership has determined it has two operating and reportable segments based upon geographic location, the U.S. and Canada. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Canada segment information, as reported in the following table, is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements of the Partnership's Canada operations, which primarily occur through a non-guaranteed subsidiary of the Partnership. For computation of segment information, the Partnership allocates costs incurred by the U.S. entity in support of Canada operations to the Canada segment and does not eliminate intercompany items, such as management fees paid to affiliated entities. The U.S. segment information is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements less the Canada segment information as presented. Pre-variable income represents income before variable compensation expense and before allocations to partners. This is consistent with how management viewsreviews the segments to assess performance.

The Partnership evaluates segment performance based upon income (loss) before allocations to partners, as well as income before variable compensation (“pre-variable income”). Variable compensation is determined at the Partnership level for profit sharing and home office associate and branch office administratorteam support members bonus amounts, and therefore is allocated to each geographic segment independent of that segment’s individual pre-variable income. Financial advisor bonuses are determined by the overall Partnership’s profitability, as well as the performance of the individual financial advisors. Both income (loss) before allocations to partners and pre-variable income are considered in evaluating segment performance. Long-lived assets are not disclosed because the balances are not used for evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to segments. However, total assets for each segment are provided for informational purposes, as well as capital expenditures and depreciation and amortization.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.  For computation of segment information, the Partnership allocates costs incurred by the U.S. entity in support of Canada operations to the Canada segment.  Canada segment information is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership’s Canada operations without eliminating intercompany items, such as management fees paid to affiliated entities.  The U.S. segment information is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements less the Canada segment information as presented.  This is consistent with how management reviews the segments in order to assess performance.

6769


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

The following table shows financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:31:

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Net revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

9,127

 

 

$

8,233

 

 

$

7,305

 

 

$

11,902

 

 

$

11,946

 

 

$

9,805

 

Canada

 

 

242

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

201

 

 

 

367

 

 

 

333

 

 

 

258

 

Total net revenue

 

$

9,369

 

 

$

8,469

 

 

$

7,506

 

 

$

12,269

 

 

$

12,279

 

 

$

10,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest and dividends revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

249

 

 

$

228

 

 

$

170

 

 

$

354

 

 

$

69

 

 

$

99

 

Canada

 

 

10

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

6

 

Total net interest and dividends revenue

 

$

259

 

 

$

237

 

 

$

174

 

 

$

372

 

 

$

73

 

 

$

105

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-variable income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

2,194

 

 

$

1,972

 

 

$

1,681

 

 

$

3,057

 

 

$

3,489

 

 

$

2,673

 

Canada

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

26

 

Total pre-variable income

 

$

2,210

 

 

$

1,988

 

 

$

1,685

 

 

$

3,139

 

 

$

3,554

 

 

$

2,699

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

1,094

 

 

$

975

 

 

$

795

 

 

$

1,694

 

 

$

1,907

 

 

$

1,385

 

Canada

 

 

24

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

29

 

Total variable compensation

 

$

1,118

 

 

$

998

 

 

$

813

 

 

$

1,735

 

 

$

1,949

 

 

$

1,414

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before allocations to partners:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

1,100

 

 

$

997

 

 

$

886

 

 

$

1,363

 

 

$

1,582

 

 

$

1,288

 

Canada

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

41

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

(3

)

Total income before allocations to partners

 

$

1,092

 

 

$

990

 

 

$

872

 

 

$

1,404

 

 

$

1,605

 

 

$

1,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

170

 

 

$

102

 

 

$

78

 

 

$

298

 

 

$

229

 

 

$

126

 

Canada

 

 

6

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

3

 

Total capital expenditures

 

$

176

 

 

$

105

 

 

$

80

 

 

$

302

 

 

$

234

 

 

$

129

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

113

 

 

$

92

 

 

$

83

 

 

$

483

 

 

$

445

 

 

$

428

 

Canada

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

15

 

Total depreciation and amortization

 

$

115

 

 

$

94

 

 

$

85

 

 

$

499

 

 

$

461

 

 

$

443

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets at year end:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

18,577

 

 

$

15,187

 

 

$

16,563

 

 

$

28,761

 

 

$

31,034

 

 

$

27,776

 

Canada

 

 

740

 

 

 

628

 

 

 

613

 

 

 

1,131

 

 

 

1,174

 

 

 

1,078

 

Total assets

 

$

19,317

 

 

$

15,815

 

 

$

17,176

 

 

$

29,892

 

 

$

32,208

 

 

$

28,854

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial advisors at year end:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

 

17,830

 

 

 

16,797

 

 

 

15,347

 

 

 

17,961

 

 

 

17,971

 

 

 

18,321

 

Canada

 

 

874

 

 

 

818

 

 

 

748

 

 

 

835

 

 

 

852

 

 

 

904

 

Total financial advisors

 

 

18,704

 

 

 

17,615

 

 

 

16,095

 

 

 

18,796

 

 

 

18,823

 

 

 

19,225

 

6870


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 16 – RELATED PARTIES

As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Partnership leased approximately 10%11% of its branch office space from its financial advisors (see Note 2).advisors. The associated lease right-of-use assetassets and lease liabilityliabilities included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition were both $83 atas of December 31, 2019.2022 and 2021 were $105 and $106 and $95 and $96, respectively. Lease cost related to these leases was $34 for the year ended December 31, 2019.  Rent$41, $37 and other lease-related expenses were $32 and $30$35 for the years ended December 31, 20182022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively. These leases are executed and maintained in a similar manner as those entered into with third parties. See Note 2 for additional information about the Partnership's leases.

Olive Street isPassport Research served as the investment adviser to the eightMoney Market Fund, which is offered solely to clients of Edward Jones, until the transfer of investment advisory services to Olive Street became effective on November 2, 2022 (see Note 1). Both investment advisers contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse fund operating expenses to the extent necessary to limit the annual operating expenses of the Money Market Fund. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, Passport Research earned $48, $15 and $56 in investment management fees, respectively, net of waived fees of $8, $51 and $7 in the respective periods to maintain a positive client yield on the Money Market Fund in light of the low interest rate environment in those years. Olive Street earned $8 in investment management fees from the Money Market Fund and reimbursed Edward Jones $2 for operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022. Olive Street is also the investment adviser to the eleven sub-advised mutual funds comprising the BB Trust, andwhich is offered solely to clients of Edward Jones. Olive Street has primary responsibility for setting the overall investment strategies and selecting and managing sub-advisers, subject to the review and approval of the BB Trust's Board of Trustees. Olive Street has contractually agreed to waive any investment adviser fees above those amounts paid to the sub-advisers.sub-advisers for the BB Trust. The investment adviser fee revenue earned by Olive Street, included within asset-based fee revenue onin the Consolidated Statements of Income, is offset by the expense paid to the sub-advisers, included within fund sub-adviser fees on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The total amounts recognized for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 were $147, $123$239, $233 and $91,$174, respectively.

As the investment adviser to the Money Market Fund, Passport Research has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse Fund operating expenses to the extent necessary to limit the annual operating expenses of the Money Market Fund.  For the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Passport Research earned $58, $48 and $39, respectively, in investment management fees with no waived fees in those periods. Further, Edward Jones earns certain fees from the Money Market Fund, some or all of which may be voluntarily waived. For the three yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017,2022, Olive Street reimbursed Edward Jones $5 for waived fees, resulting in total fees earned were $138, $113 and $98, respectively,by the Partnership of $103, net of the $30, $30 and $22$89 of waived fees in the respective periods.  period. Edward Jones waived all $190 earned in fees during 2021. For the year ended December 31, 2020, total fees earned were $46, net of the $133 of waived fees in the period. Edward Jones waived fees in 2022, 2021, and 2020 to limit the Money Market Fund's annual operating expenses, as well as to maintain a positive client yield in light of the low interest rate environment in those years.

Edward Jones Foundation ("Foundation") is a non-profit organization that supports national, regional, and local nonprofits to advance a range of community causes championed by the Partnership, its affiliates and employees. The Foundation is governed by certain JFC general partners, and Edward Jones is the sole contributor of funds. Edward Jones contributed to the Foundation during 2022, 2021 and 2020, which is reflected in other operating expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Contributions are voluntary and at the discretion of Edward Jones each period.

In the normal course of business, partners and associates of the Partnership and its affiliates use the same advisory, brokerage and trust services of the Partnership as unrelated third parties, with certain discounts on commissions and fees for certain services. The Partnership has included balances arising from such transactions in the Consolidated Financial Statements on the same basis as other clients.

The Partnership recognizes interest income for the interest earned from partners who elect to finance a portion or all of their Partnership capital contributions through loans made available from the Partnership (see Note 9).

NOTE 17 – QUARTERLY INFORMATION

(Unaudited)

 

 

2019 Quarters Ended

 

 

 

Mar 29

 

 

Jun 28

 

 

Sep 27

 

 

Dec 31

 

Net revenue

 

$

2,190

 

 

$

2,319

 

 

$

2,367

 

 

$

2,493

 

Income before allocations to partners

 

$

241

 

 

$

285

 

 

$

281

 

 

$

285

 

Income allocated to limited partners per

   weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited

   partnership unit outstanding

 

$

29.20

 

 

$

34.55

 

 

$

33.93

 

 

$

34.54

 

 

 

2018 Quarters Ended

 

 

 

Mar 30

 

 

Jun 29

 

 

Sep 28

 

 

Dec 31

 

Net revenue

 

$

2,042

 

 

$

2,083

 

 

$

2,191

 

 

$

2,153

 

Income before allocations to partners

 

$

233

 

 

$

240

 

 

$

273

 

 

$

244

 

Income allocated to limited partners per

   weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited

   partnership unit outstanding

 

$

30.16

 

 

$

31.02

 

 

$

35.42

 

 

$

31.53

 

6971


PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 18 – OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The Partnership does not offset financial instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.  However, the Partnership enters into master netting arrangements with counterparties for securities purchased under agreements to resell that are subject to net settlement in the event of default.  These agreements create a right of offset for the amounts due to and due from the same counterparty in the event of default or bankruptcy.

The following table shows the Partnership's securities purchased under agreements to resell as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross amounts

 

Net amounts

 

 

Gross amounts not offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

offset in the

 

presented in the

 

 

in the Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Consolidated

 

Consolidated

 

 

Statements of Financial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

amounts of

 

 

Statements of

 

Statements of

 

 

Condition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

recognized

 

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

 

Financial

 

Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

assets

 

 

Condition

 

Condition

 

 

instruments

 

collateral(1)

 

 

Net amount

 

2019

 

$

1,693

 

 

 

 

1,693

 

 

 

 

(1,693

)

 

$

 

2018

 

$

911

 

 

 

 

911

 

 

 

 

(911

)

 

$

 

(1)

Actual collateral was 102% of the related assets in U.S. agreements and 100% in Canada agreements for all periods presented.

NOTE 17 – OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

NOTE 19 – CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The following table shows supplemental cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

157

 

 

$

125

 

 

$

90

 

Cash paid for taxes

 

$

10

 

 

$

10

 

 

$

10

 

Non-cash activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of general partnership interests through

   partnership loans in current year

 

$

164

 

 

$

170

 

 

$

142

 

Repayment of partnership loans through distributions

   from partnership capital in current year

 

$

136

 

 

$

135

 

 

$

111

 

Declared distributions for retired partnership capital

   in current year but unpaid at year end(1)

 

$

113

 

 

$

97

 

 

$

 

(1)

Declared distributions for retired Partnership capital are includedPartnership does not offset financial instruments in the accounts payable, accrued expenses and other line of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

The following table reconciles certain line items on the Consolidated Statements of Financial ConditionCondition. However, the Partnership enters into master netting arrangements with counterparties for securities purchased under agreements to resell that are subject to net settlement in the cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance on the Consolidated Statementsevent of Cash Flowsdefault. These agreements create a right of offset for the years endedamounts due to and due from the same counterparty in the event of default or bankruptcy.

The following table shows the Partnership's securities purchased under agreements to resell as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:31:

 

 

 

 

 

Gross amounts

 

Net amounts

 

 

Gross amounts not offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

offset in the

 

presented in the

 

 

in the Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Consolidated

 

Consolidated

 

 

Statements of Financial

 

 

 

 

 

 

amounts of

 

 

Statements of

 

Statements of

 

 

Condition

 

 

 

 

 

 

recognized

 

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

 

Financial

 

Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

assets

 

 

Condition

 

Condition

 

 

instruments

 

collateral

 

 

Net amount

 

2022

 

$

437

 

 

 

 

437

 

 

 

 

(437

)

 

$

 

2021

 

$

1,529

 

 

 

 

1,529

 

 

 

 

(1,526

)

 

$

3

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

1,014

 

 

$

1,498

 

 

$

846

 

Cash and investments segregated under federal regulations

 

 

10,387

 

 

 

8,241

 

 

 

10,099

 

Less: Investments segregated under federal regulations

 

 

3,394

 

 

 

1,002

 

 

 

2,408

 

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

$

8,007

 

 

$

8,737

 

 

$

8,537

 

Restricted cash represents cash segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 under the Exchange Act.

70


PART II

ITEM 9. CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

NOTE 18 – CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The following table shows supplemental cash flow information for the years ended December 31:

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

141

 

 

$

94

 

 

$

103

 

Cash paid for taxes

 

$

17

 

 

$

13

 

 

$

11

 

Non-cash activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of general partnership interests through
   partnership loans in current year

 

$

276

 

 

$

222

 

 

$

163

 

Repayment of partnership loans through distributions
   from partnership capital in current year

 

$

191

 

 

$

225

 

 

$

182

 

Declared distributions for retired partnership capital
   in current year but unpaid at year-end
(1)

 

$

219

 

 

$

254

 

 

$

145

 

(1)
Declared distributions for retired Partnership capital are included in the accounts payable, accrued expenses and other line of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

The following table reconciles certain line items in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition to the cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31:

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

1,882

 

 

$

1,835

 

 

$

1,125

 

Cash and investments segregated under federal regulations

 

 

17,827

 

 

 

20,179

 

 

 

17,918

 

Less: Investments segregated under federal regulations

 

 

11,327

 

 

 

14,308

 

 

 

12,168

 

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

$

8,382

 

 

$

7,706

 

 

$

6,875

 

Restricted cash represents cash segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 under the Exchange Act.

72


PART II

ITEM 9. CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Partnership’s certifying officers, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation, with the participation of its management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and we were required to apply our judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the date of completion of the evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. We will continue to review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting, on an ongoing basis, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure our systems evolve with our business.

Management's report on internal control over financial reporting and the report of independent registered public accounting firm are set forth in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20192022 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

71

73


PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

JFC does not have a board of directors. As of February 28, 2020,24, 2023, the Partnership was composed of 47334,233 individual partners, many of whom hold more than one type of partnership interest. Of those individuals, 602 were general partners and 24,27334,075 were limited partners, 2,8455,060 of whom are also service partners, as well as 530and 668 were subordinated limited partners.partners as of February 24, 2023.

Managing Partner. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Managing Partner has primary responsibility for administering the Partnership’s business, determining its policies, and controlling the management and conduct of the Partnership’s business. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Managing Partner's powers include, without limitation, the power to admit and dismiss general partners and the power to adjust the proportion of their respective interests in the Partnership. The Managing Partner serves for an indefinite term and may be removed by a majority vote of the Executive CommitteeELT (as discussed below) or a vote of the general partners holding a majority percentage ownership in the Partnership. If at any time the office of the Managing Partner is vacant, the Executive CommitteeELT will succeed to all the powers and duties of the Managing Partner until a new Managing Partner is elected by a majority of the Executive Committee.ELT. The Partnership’s operating subsidiaries are managed by JFC, under the leadership of the Managing Partner, pursuant to services agreements.

Executive Committee.Enterprise Leadership Team. The Executive CommitteeELT consists of the Managing Partner and fiveup to nine15 additional general partners appointed by the Managing Partner, with the specific number determined by the Managing Partner. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the members of the Executive CommitteeELT are the executive officers of the Partnership. The purpose of the Executive CommitteeELT is to provide counsel and advice to the Managing Partner in discharging hertheir functions, including the consideration of ownership of Partnership capital, ensuring the Partnership’s business risks are managed appropriately and helping to establish the strategic direction of the Partnership. In addition, the Executive CommitteeELT takes an active role in identifying, measuring and controlling the risks to which the Partnership is subject. Executive CommitteeELT members serve for an indefinite term and may be removed by the Managing Partner or a vote of general partners holding a majority percentage ownership in the Partnership. Furthermore, in the event the position of Managing Partner is vacant, the Executive CommitteeELT shall succeed to all of the powers and duties of the Managing Partner until a new Managing Partner is elected by a majority of the Executive Committee.ELT. The Partnership does not have a formal code of ethics that applies to its Executive CommitteeELT members, as it relies on the core values and beliefs of the Partnership, as well as the Partnership Agreement. Throughout all of 2019,2022, the Executive Committee was comprised ofELT included Penny Pennington, Chairman, Kevin D. Bastien,Andrew Miedler, Kenneth R. Cella, Jr., Vincent J. Ferrari,Lisa Dolan, Tina Hrevus, Kristin Johnson, Francis LaQuinta, Christopher Lewis, Timothy Rea, and Daniel J. Timm.  On January 17, 2019, Thomas P. CurranWayne Roberts. Effective September 13, 2022, David Chubak, David Gunn, Lena Haas, Hasan Malik and Christopher N. LewisSuzan McDaniel were appointedadmitted to the Executive Committee. On November 4, 2019, Kristin M. Johnson was appointed as a member ofELT. Kevin Bastien stepped down from the Executive Committee. EffectiveELT effective September 13, 2022 and retired from the Partnership effective December 31, 2019,2022. Effective March 1, 2023, Mr. TimmLewis retired from the Partnership and wasis no longer a member of the Executive Committee.ELT.

The following table is a listing as of February 28, 202024, 2023 of the members of the Executive Committee, each member’s age, the year in which each member became an Executive Committee member, theELT year in which each member became a general partner and each member’s area of responsibility. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, all general partners, including the members of the Executive Committee,ELT, are required to retire in their capacity as general partners by the end of the calendar year during which they turn the age of 65. The members’ biographies are below.

 

 

 

 

Executive

 

General

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Committee

 

Partner

 

Area of Responsibility

Penny Pennington

 

56

 

2014

 

2006

 

Managing Partner

Kevin D. Bastien

 

54

 

2010

 

1998

 

Chief Financial Officer

Kenneth R. Cella, Jr.

 

50

 

2014

 

2002

 

Client Strategies Group

Thomas P. Curran

 

59

 

2019

 

2006

 

Branch Development

Vincent J. Ferrari

 

59

 

2017

 

2004

 

Firm Administration

Kristin M. Johnson

 

48

 

2019

 

2006

 

Human Resources

Christopher N. Lewis

 

53

 

2019

 

2007

 

General Counsel

 

 

 

 

Enterprise

 

General

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Leadership Team

 

Partner

 

Area of Responsibility

Penny Pennington

 

59

 

2014

 

2006

 

Managing Partner

Andrew Miedler

 

45

 

2021

 

2011

 

Chief Financial Officer

Kenneth Cella, Jr.

 

53

 

2014

 

2002

 

Head of Branch Development

David Chubak

 

42

 

2022

 

2022

 

Head of U.S. Business Unit

Lisa Dolan

 

56

 

2020

 

2007

 

Chief Operating Officer

David Gunn

 

50

 

2022

 

2008

 

President, Edward Jones Canada

Lena Haas

 

47

 

2022

 

2018

 

Head of Wealth Management Advice and Solutions

Tina Hrevus

 

56

 

2021

 

2012

 

Managing Partner's Chief of Staff

Kristin Johnson

 

51

 

2019

 

2006

 

Chief Transformation Officer

Francis LaQuinta

 

59

 

2021

 

2016

 

Chief Information Officer

Chris Lewis

 

56

 

2019

 

2007

 

General Counsel

Hasan Malik

 

49

 

2022

 

2022

 

Chief Strategy Officer

Suzan McDaniel

 

51

 

2022

 

2020

 

Chief Human Resources Officer

Timothy Rea

 

54

 

2021

 

2016

 

Chief Experience, Brand and Marketing Officer

Wayne Roberts

 

51

 

2021

 

2008

 

Head of New Market Opportunities

7274


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, continued

Penny Pennington, Managing Partner– Ms. Pennington joined the Partnership in 2000 as a financial advisor, was named a general partner in 2006 and has served as Managing Partner and Chief Executive Officer since January 2019. She has held a number of senior leadership roles in key divisions. Most recently, she led the Client Strategies Group since(now known as Wealth Management Advice and Solutions) beginning in 2015. Previously, she was responsible for the New Financial Advisor Training department, BOABranch Office Administrator Development department and Branch and Region Development division. Ms. Pennington holds a Chartered Financial Analyst designation, is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School Securities Industry Institute, earned her MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and earned her bachelor’s degree from the University of Virginia. In 2022, Ms. Pennington was elected to serve a three-year term as a large-firm governor of the FINRA Board of Governors. Ms. Pennington is an active member of the St. Louis community, serving on the boards of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, United Way of Greater St. Louis, the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, Washington University and Executive Committee of the Chair's Council for Greater St. Louis, Inc.

Kevin D. Bastien,Andrew Miedler, Chief Financial Officer – Mr. BastienMiedler joined the Partnership in 1996,2002 in the Equity Research department as an analyst, was named a general partner in 19982011 and has served as Chief Financial Officer since January 2009.  He isNovember 2021, responsible for the performance of the Finance Division. Mr. Miedler joined the Finance division including Firm Strategyin 2014 and Planning areas.became Finance division leader in 2020. Previously, he has beenwas responsible for variousthe Packaged Products and Capital Markets areas of the Finance division.Product Review. Mr. BastienMiedler holds a Chartered Financial Analyst designation and earned his bachelor’sbachelor's and master’smaster's degrees in accounting from Southern Illinoisthe University at Carbondale.of Missouri-Columbia.

Kenneth R. Cella, Jr., Client Strategies GroupHead of Branch DevelopmentMr. Cella joined the Partnership in 1990 and was named a general partner in 2002. Mr. Cella is responsible for the Edward Jones Branch Development division across the United States and Canada. Previously he was responsible for the Client Strategies Group which includes the firm's Marketing, Products,(now known as Wealth Management Advice and Guidance, Trading and Solutions areas.  Mr. Cella has heldSolutions), a number of senior leadership roles across divisions.  Previously he was responsible for the Branch Development division,divisions and worked as a financial advisor and has been responsible for the Branch Training department and various areas of the Client Strategies Group.advisor. Mr. Cella earned his bachelor’s degree from the University of Missouri-St. Louis and an MBA from Washington University in St. Louis. Mr. Cella serves on the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ("SIFMA") Board of Directors as chair-elect, the Private Client/Wealth Management Sub-Committee and Private Client Group Steering Committee.the SIFMA Foundation.

Thomas P. Curran, Branch Development David Chubak, Head of U.S. Business UnitMr. CurranChubak joined Edward Jones in 2022 as general partner and head of the U.S. business unit. Prior to joining the Partnership, Mr. Chubak spent nearly a decade at Citigroup, most recently serving as the CEO of Citigroup's Retail Bank, where he led all Retail channels, as well as product management, segments and risk management. Mr. Chubak is a graduate of New York University School of Law and earned his bachelor's degree from Columbia University.

Lisa Dolan, Chief Operating Officer – Ms. Dolan joined the PartnershipEdward Jones Finance division in 19922005 and was named a general partner in 2006. Mr. Curran is responsible for the Branch Development division, which encompasses Financial Advisor Talent Acquisition, Branch Office Administrator Talent Acquisition2007. Ms. Dolan has held leadership roles in tax and Performance, Branch Training, Branch Administration, Branch Insights, Learningpartnership accounting, financial and Support,regulatory reporting, expenditure management, compensation accounting, finance systems, and Branch and Region Development. Previously he was responsible for Financial Advisor Talent Acquisition,has led the Finance division. Ms. Dolan has responsibility for leading Operations, Service, Division, acted as the Banking Services global leader, served asEnterprise Risk Management, Planning and Strategic Execution and Workplace Services. Ms. Dolan earned a regional leader and worked as a financial advisor. Mr. Curran received his bachelor's degree from Augustana CollegeSaint Louis University and his master's degree from the University of Iowa.is a certified public accountant.

Vincent J. Ferrari, Chief Administrative Officer

David Gunn, President, Edward Jones Canada– Mr. FerrariGunn joined the Partnership in 2003,2000 and was named a general partner in 2004 and has2008. Mr. Gunn previously served as a financial advisor in Canada and led Financial Advisor Talent Acquisition. Mr. Gunn earned a bachelor's degree from Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario and an MBA from Northwestern University.

Lena Haas, Head of Wealth Management Advice and Solutions – Ms. Haas joined Edward Jones in November 2017 and was named a general partner in 2018. She led the firm's Banking and Trust areas and subsequently expanded her leadership to the Investment Advisory and Products areas. In 2022, she became head of the Wealth Management Advice and Solutions division. Ms. Haas serves on the Board of Trustees of the Edward Jones Money Market Fund and Bridge Builder Trust. She earned her bachelor’s degree from Tufts University, an MBA from Harvard Business School, and completed Kellogg School of Management Women’s Senior Leadership program.

75


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, continued

Tina Hrevus, Managing Partner's Chief Administrative Officer since 2017.   Mr. Ferrariof Staff – Ms. Hrevus joined Edward Jones in 1987, was named a general partner in 2012 and joined the Managing Partner's Office in 2019. Ms. Hrevus has held leadership roles responsible for Marketing and communication disciplines and brings more than 30 years of marketing expertise to strengthen and support the Managing Partner’s office. Ms. Hrevus has overall responsibility for the Information Systems, OperationsPurpose, Community and Service divisionsPhilanthropy and serves as the ChairManaging Partner's chief of staff. Ms. Hrevus is a graduate of the Partnership's Audit Committee.  Previously he served asUniversity of Pennsylvania's Wharton School Securities Industry Institute and the firm'sUniversity of Missouri-Columbia's School of Journalism.

Kristin Johnson, Chief InformationTransformation Officer from 2007 to 2018.  Mr. Ferrari earned his bachelor’s degree from Ursinus College.

Kristin M. Johnson, Human Resources– Ms. Johnson joined the Partnership in 1995 and was named a general partner in 2006. Ms. Johnson has held leadership roles in internal audit, service, operations and talent acquisition and performance for BOAs.BTSMs. Ms. Johnson was appointed to the Partnership's Management Committee in 2014, and in November 2019, she was namedserved as the firm's Chief Human Resources Officer between 2019 and September 2022 and now serves as the firm's Chief Transformation Officer. Ms. Johnson earned her bachelor's degree from the University of Illinois, a master's in information management from Webster University and completed Washington University's executive MBA program. Ms. Johnson serves on

Francis LaQuinta, Chief Information Officer – Mr. LaQuinta joined the boards ofEdward Jones Technology division in 2016 as general partner and senior director for Strategic Delivery. Mr. LaQuinta became Chief Information Officer in 2018 responsible for the Center of Creative Arts, Websterfirm's overall technology leadership, vision and digital strategy. Mr. LaQuinta is also responsible for digital product management and data strategy. Mr. LaQuinta earned a bachelor's and master's degree from Pace University and is a member of the St. Louis Fashion Fund.  CIO council.

Christopher N. Lewis, General CounselMr. Lewis joined the Partnership as a general partner in 2007 as Deputy General Counsel.Counsel in the legal division. In 2015, Mr. Lewis was named General Counsel and is responsible for leading the Partnership's legal, compliance and government relations areas. Mr. Lewis is a graduate of Columbia University School of Law and earned his bachelor's degree from Manhattanville College. He is a member of the FINRA National Arbitration and Mediation Committee, the FINRA National Adjudicatory Council, the Executive Committee of the SIFMA Compliance and Legal Society and the SIFMA General Counsel Committee.

Hasan Malik, Chief Strategy OfficerMr. Malik joined the Partnership in 2022 as general partner and co-head of Firm Strategy, becoming Chief Strategy Officer upon Kevin Bastien's retirement on December 31, 2022. Prior to joining Edward Jones, Mr. Malik was head of strategy for four years and head of GS Accelerate for one year at Goldman Sachs. Before joining Goldman Sachs, he held various executive roles with Visa, Inc. and McKinsey & Company, Inc. Mr. Malik earned his bachelor's degree and MBA from the Institute of Business Administration in Karachi, Pakistan and also has an MBA in finance and entrepreneurship from the University of Chicago.

73

Suzan McDaniel, Chief Human Resources Officer – Ms. McDaniel joined Edward Jones in 2020 as general partner and head of Human Resources Talent. Ms. McDaniel serves as the firm's Chief Human Resources Officer. Ms. McDaniel previously served more than eight years as a vice president in Human Resources and Business Transformation at BHP in Melbourne, Australia. Ms. McDaniel earned her bachelor's degree in psychology and her master's degree and doctorate in organizational psychology from the University of Tulsa.

Timothy Rea, Chief Experience, Brand and Marketing Officer– Mr. Rea joined Edward Jones in 2016. As Chief Experience, Brand and Marketing Officer, he is responsible for the firm’s marketing, branding and experience initiatives. Mr. Rea previously served as the executive vice president and chief marketing officer for Office Depot Inc., senior vice president of brand marketing for Darden Restaurants, and had increasing brand management leadership positions at Hershey Foods Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Co. Mr. Rea earned his bachelor's degree in economics from Harvard University and his master's degrees in economics and public administration from the University of Texas at El Paso. Mr. Rea is also an Army combat veteran.

Wayne Roberts, Head of New Market Opportunities – Mr. Roberts joined Edward Jones in 1994 as a financial advisor. He was named a regional leader in 2006 and a general partner in 2008. Since 2008, Mr. Roberts has held numerous leadership roles in the Branch Development Division including Talent Acquisition, and Branch and Region Development, as well as the Client Strategies Group. In his current role, Mr. Roberts is responsible for the development and implementation of business segment strategies, as well as developing future market and business segment opportunities. Mr. Roberts earned his bachelor's degree in finance from Linfield College in McMinnville, Oregon, and his executive MBA from Washington University in St. Louis.

76


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, continued

Management Committee.  The Management Committee consists of up to 25 general partners appointed by the Managing Partner, with the specific number determined by the Managing Partner, and includes the members of the Executive Committee.  As of February 28, 2020, the Management Committee consisted of 16 general partners.  The Management Committee is generally comprised of general partners with overall responsibility for a significant or critical functional division or area of the Partnership’s operating subsidiaries.  The Management Committee meets weekly, is operational in nature, and is responsible for identifying, developing and accomplishing the Partnership’s objectives through, among other means, sharing information across divisions and identifying and resolving risk management issues for the Partnership.  General partners on the Management Committee serve for an indefinite term and may be removed by the Managing Partner.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee was created by the Partnership Agreement. The Audit Committee operates according to its charter adopted by the Executive Committee.ELT. Pursuant to its charter and the Partnership Agreement, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the Partnership's independent auditors. The Audit Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of an understanding of the Partnership’s financial statements and related disclosures and the financial reporting process, overseeing the Partnership’s efforts to comply with the financial reporting control requirements of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes Oxley”), discussing policies with respect to risk assessment and providing input torisk management, and overseeing the performance of the Partnership’s Internal Audit division regarding audit topicsplans, engagements and the resolution of outstanding audit findings.observations.

As of February 28, 2020,24, 2023, the Audit Committee was comprised of Vincent J. Ferrari, Chairman,Kristin Johnson, Chair, Penny Pennington, Kevin D. Bastien, Kenneth R. Cella, Jr., Thomas P. Curran, Kristin M. Johnson,Andrew Miedler, Lisa Dolan, Christopher N. Lewis, Robert F. Cullen III, the general partner responsible for the Internal Audit division, Lisa M. Dolan, a member of the Management Committee and a general partner in the Finance division, and independent members of the committee Edward L. GlotzbachMark Wuller and Mark E. Wuller.  Sandra Pundmann.

Mr. BastienMiedler meets the requirements adopted by the SEC for qualification as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K. Because Mr. BastienMiedler is a general partner, he would not meet the definition of “independent” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). However, since the Partnership’s securities are not listed on any exchange, it is not subject to the listing requirements of the NYSE or any other securities exchanges. Audit Committee members are appointed by the Managing Partner, serve for an indefinite term and may be removed by the Managing Partner.

Other Committees. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the Managing Partner has also established other committees, which serve at the discretion of the Managing Partner. These include an Operating Committeeaccountable to ELT and responsible for the firm's strategic execution of enterprise business priorities.

RISK MANAGEMENT

Overview

Overview

The Partnership’s business model and activities expose it to a number of different risks. The most significant risks to which the Partnership is subject include business andinclude: operational risks including security breaches;technology and third-party risks; financial risks including credit, risk; market, liquidity and competition risk;interest rate risks; legal and legal, regulatorycompliance risks; and reputational risk.strategic risks. The identification and ongoing management of the Partnership’s riskrisks is critical to its long-term business success and related financial performance.

The Partnership's risk management framework is driven by the Partnership's governance structure established in the Partnership Agreement. The Managing Partner is ultimately responsible for the Partnership's risk management. The Managing Partner has designated the Partnership's Executive CommitteeELT as having responsibility for overall risk management. As disclosed under Part II, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance – Executive Committee,ELT, as of February 28, 2020,24, 2023, the Executive CommitteeELT consisted of the Partnership’s Managing Partner and six14 other general partners, each responsible for broad functional areas of the Partnership. The Executive Committee takes an active role in identifying, measuring and controlling the risks to whichELT is responsible for the Partnership is subject.  The Executive Committee communicates regularly and meets monthly to meet its responsibilities.

The Management Committee assists the Executive Committee in its ongoingmaintaining a risk management responsibilities throughframework comprised of a system of enterprise risk standards, governance and oversight, and risk management capabilities to enable the management of risks in support of the firm's strategic objectives, to protect its day-to-day operations.  culture and reputation, and promote financial stability.

The Partnership's Enterprise Risk Management Committee is responsible for identifying, developingguiding the development and accomplishingmaintenance of the Partnership’s objectives.  In addition,Partnership's enterprise-wide risk management framework (including risk identification, assessment, management, monitoring and reporting), reviewing reports on the Management Committee is responsible for sharing information across divisionsPartnership's material risks and identifying issuesrisk exposures, and risksassisting and collaborating with other members of the Management Committee.  The Management Committee meets weeklygovernance and provides a forumsupporting committees to both identify and resolveoperate its enterprise-wide risk management issues for the Partnership.framework.

74


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, continued

The Audit Committee, through its activities, also supports the Executive CommitteeELT in its ongoing risk management responsibilities. The Audit Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of an understanding of the Partnership’s financial statements and the financial reporting process, overseeing the Partnership’s efforts to comply with the financial reporting control requirements of Sarbanes Oxley, discussing policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, overseeing the independent auditors' qualifications and independence, and providing input tothe performance of the Partnership’s Internal Audit division regarding audit topicsplans, engagements and the resolution of outstanding audit findings.observations.

77


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, continued

In addition to thesethe committees above, the Managing Partner has established certain governance committees with prominent roles in the risk management process.framework. Also, certain supporting committees have responsibility for managing and providing oversight on specific types of risks. Governance and supporting committees with prominent roles in the risk management process include:

Enterprise Risk Management Committee – governance committee responsible for facilitating the Partnership's identification of risks and assisting and collaborating with other governance committees as well as supporting committees that may oversee specific risks.  The committee also helps coordinate and serves as a resource regarding the Partnership's risk management activities.

New Products and Services Committee – governance committee responsible for evaluating all new or materially modified products and/or services for alignment with clients’ needs and consistency with the Partnership’s objectives and strategies, making recommendations to the Executive CommitteeELT and ensuring that all areas of the Partnership are sufficiently prepared to support, service, and supervise any new or materially modified products and/or services. A new product or service has tomust be approvedrecommended by the New Products and Services Committee and approved by the Executive CommitteeELT before being implemented by the Partnership.

Investment Funds Governance Committee – governance committee responsible for reviewing the fundamental strategy decisions of JFC's wholly-owned investment advisors to the Partnership's proprietary investment funds, including providing guidance on various aspects of operations and coordinating communications with the boards of the Partnership's proprietary mutual funds.

Investment Policy Committee – governance committee responsible for the Partnership's investment philosophy and development and the alignment of the advice and guidance necessary to help clients meet their long-term financial goals. Guidance is primarily related to investments and solutions and the way such investments and solutions are constructed into portfolios and tailored to meet clients' needs.

Credit Review Committee – supporting committee that establishes policies governing the Partnership’s client margin accounts. The committee discusses and monitors the risks associated with the Partnership’s client margin practices and current trends in the industry. The committee reviews large client margin balances, the quality of the collateral supporting those accounts, and the credit exposure related to those accounts to minimize potential losses.

Finance Risk Committee – supporting committee that reviews the Partnership’s financial liquidity, cash investment portfolio and capital adequacy and assesses major exposures to financial institutions. These exposures include banks in which the Partnership has deposits or on which it depends for funding.

In addition to the committees discussed above, each of the Partnership’sEnterprise Risk Management department and risk teams embedded in Partnership divisions also assistsassist the Executive CommitteeELT in its ongoing risk management activities through their day-to-day responsibilities.responsibilities, including systems of internal controls and risk management policies and procedures. Internal Audit, Enterprise Risk Management and risk management teams in the Partnership's divisions review and test controls throughout the Partnership to support leaders and associates with identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring, and reporting on risks in their business segments and functional capabilities. All associates are encouraged to speak up when they see something that is causing or could cause harm to the Partnership's clients, communities, colleagues, business, operations, or reputation.

As part of the financial services industry, the Partnership’s business is subject to inherent risks. As a result, despite its risk management efforts and activities, there can be no absolute assurance that the Partnership will not experience significant unexpected losses due to the realization of certain operational or other risks to which the Partnership is subject. The following discussion highlights the Partnership’s procedures and policies designed to identify, assess, and manage the primary risks of its operations.business.

Operational Risks

Business and Operational Risk

There is an element of operational risk inherent within all of the Partnership’s business.business activities arising from technology, external threats, internal processes and associates and third-party relationships. The Partnership is exposed to operational risk and itsPartnership's business model is dependent on complex information technology systems, and there is a degree of exposure to systems failure.  Further, the Partnership'sinternal information technology systems, and those of third parties the Partnership relies on, are subjectand there is a degree of exposure to systems failure and security breaches.incidents. The Partnership has processes in place designed to safeguard

75


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officersa Chief Information Officer and Corporate Governance, continued

Chief Information Security Officer who are responsible for enhancing our technological systems for business operations and monitor against suchimproving information security breachespolicies and other disruptions.standards, respectively. A business continuity planning processresiliency program has been established to respond to severe business disruptions. The Partnership and its third-party vendors have data centers in separateseveral regions of the United States. TheseThe Partnership's data centers act as disaster recovery and redundant sites with each other. While these data centers are designed to be redundant with one another, a prolonged interruption of any site might result in a delay of service and substantial costs and expenses. Additionally, the Partnership utilizes extensive measures to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of its information and data, including: privacy education, background screening processes, fraud prevention, system testing, expert assistance and security training. There are dedicated financial crime prevention, privacy and digital security teams focused on monitoring for current and future threats, and home office

In order

78


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, continued

associates and branch teams receive regular training on cybersecurity, privacy protection and fraud detection and prevention.

Employees are encouraged to report and address the Partnership’s risk of identifying fraudulentany suspicious or inappropriate activity, the Partnership has an anonymous ethics hotline for employeesactivity. Employees can leverage a tool to report suspicious activity for review and disciplinary action when necessary.  The Partnership’s Internal Audit and Compliance divisions investigate reports as they are received.  The Internal Audit and Compliance divisions review other Partnership activity to assist in risk identification and identification of other inappropriate activities.  In addition, the Partnership communicates and provides ongoing training regarding the Partnership’s privacy requirements and information security policies to better protect client information.

suspected cybersecurity threats via email. The Partnership is also exposedhas a dedicated Insider Threat team, which utilizes various tools to operational risk as a result of its reliance on thirduncover and mitigate technology and other threats.

Third parties to provide information technology, processing and other business support services. The Partnership’s Sourcing Office primarily manages that risk by reviewing keyTo mitigate information security risks at third-party vendors, through a vendorthe Partnership conducts due diligence on prospective service providers that process or store information and oversight process.negotiates contractual provisions requiring policies and procedures that meet a standard of care for data security and related controls.

Financial Risks

Credit Risk

is the risk that third parties who owe the Partnership money, securities or other assets will not meet their obligations. The Partnership is subject to credit risk due to the very nature of the transactions it processes for its clients. In order to manage this risk, the Partnership limits certain client transactions by, in some cases, requiring payment at the time or in advance of a client transaction being accepted. The Credit Review Committee manages the Partnership's credit risk arising out of the client margin loans it offers by limiting the amount and controlling the quality of collateral held in the client’s account against those loans. InMargin loans are limited to a fraction of the total value of the securities held in the client's account against those loans upon issuance in accordance with Federal Reserve Board Regulation T and throughout the life of the loan in accordance with FINRA rules, the Partnership requires, inRule 4210. In the event of a decline in the market value of the securities in a margin account, the Partnership requires the client to deposit additional securities or cash (or to sell a sufficient amount of securities) so that, at all times, the loan to the client is no greater than 75%65% of the value of the securities in the account, (or to sell a sufficient amount of securities in order to maintain this percentage).  The Partnership, however, generally imposeswhich is a more stringent maintenance requirement which requires thatthan FINRA Rule 4210.

The Partnership also has credit exposure with counterparties as a result of its ongoing, routine business activities. This credit exposure can arise from the loansettlement of client transactions, related failures to receive and deliver, or the client be no greater than 65%Partnership’s investing activities with other financial institutions. The Partnership's Finance Risk Committee manages relationships with financial institutions where these business activities occur and monitors its exposure to such counterparties on a regular basis to minimize its risk of loss related to such exposure.

Market Risk is the risk associated with the declining value of theits investment securities as a result of fluctuations in interest rates, security prices or overall market conditions. The Partnership's investment securities are primarily held to generate income and also assist in the account.

management of firm liquidity. The Treasury Department monitors and manages firm investments that are primarily in government and agency obligations, which are highly liquid, low-risk investments that help reduce exposure to declines in market value from market volatility. The Partnership also purchases and holds inventory security positions for retail sales to its clients andbut does not trade those positions for the purpose of generating gains for its own account. To monitor inventory positions, the Partnership has an automated trading system designed to report trading positions and risks. This system requires traders to mark positions to market and to report positions at the trader level, at the department level and for the Partnership as a whole. There are established trading and inventory limits for each trader and each department, and activity exceeding those limits is subject to supervisory review. By maintainingThe Partnership maintains an inventory hedging strategy the Partnership has avoided material inventory losses or gains in the past.  The objective of the hedging strategy isintended to mitigate the risks of carrying its inventory positions and not to generate profit for the Partnership. The compensation of the Partnership’s traders is not directly tied to gains or losses incurred by the Partnership on the inventory, which eliminates the incentive to hold inappropriate inventory positions.

The Partnership also has credit exposure with counterparties as a result of its ongoing, routine business activities.  This credit exposure can arise from the settlement of client transactions, related failures to receive and deliver, or related to the Partnership’s overnight investing activities with other financial institutions.  The Partnership monitors its exposure to such counterparties on a regular basis through the activities of its FinanceLiquidity Risk Committee in order to minimize its risk of loss related to such exposure.

Market, Liquidity and Competition Risks

Market risk is the risk of declining revenue or the value of financial instruments held by the Partnership as a result of fluctuations in interest rates, security prices or overall market conditions.  Liquidity risk is the risk of insufficient financial resources to meet the short-term or long-term cash needs of the Partnership. Competition risk isThe Partnership's Treasury Department continually evaluates and monitors the riskimpact that its business activities have on its liquidity and financial condition. The objective of the Partnership's inabilityliquidity management policies is to attractsupport the successful execution of business strategies while maintaining ongoing and retain clientssufficient liquidity. Additionally, the Partnership conducts regular liquidity stress testing to develop a consolidated view of liquidity risk exposures and personnel with the increasing pace of industry change. For a discussion of the Partnership’s market,to develop strategies to maintain sufficient liquidity and competition risk, see Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors. See Part II, Item 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for additional discussion of the Partnership's market andduring market-related or firm-specific liquidity risk.stress events.


7679


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance, continued

Interest Rate Risk is the Partnership's exposure to risk from changes in interest rates. The Treasury Department actively manages its short-term investmentsto maximize interest revenue while managing liquidity risks. The Partnership continues to evaluate its cash management strategy, including evaluating relationships with current and prospective financial institutions and identifying opportunities to further reduce the negative impact of changes in interest rates on revenue from certain cash solutions products.

Legal Regulatory and ReputationalCompliance Risk

Many aspects of the Partnership’s business involve substantial litigation and compliance risks. The Partnership is, from time to time, subject to examinations, inquiries and investigations by governmental agencies, SROs and other regulators. Such matters have in the past, and could in the future, negatively impact the Partnership’s business and result in significant expenses. In the normalordinary course of business, the Partnership also is involved, from timesubject to time, in various legal and regulatory matters, including arbitrations, class actions, other litigation and examinations, investigations and proceedings by governmental authorities, SROsarbitration claims, lawsuits and other regulators which may result in losses.potentially significant litigation such as putative class actions. Over the past several years, the number of legal actions and investigations against many firms intime, there has been increasing litigation involving the financial services industry, including the Partnership, has increased.putative class action lawsuits that may seek substantial damages. The Partnership's reputation is critical to attracting and retaining clients and financial advisors and could be damaged by certain legal or regulatory actions, unethical behavior, cyber security breaches,cybersecurity incidents, poor investment performance, or compliance failures, depending on their nature, size and scope.

The Partnership has established, through its overall compliance program, a variety of policies, procedures and proceduresa system of internal controls (including written supervisory procedures) designed to manage the risk of non-compliance by home office and branch associates and mitigate legal regulatory and reputationalcompliance risks. As a normal course of business, new accounts and client transactions are reviewed on a daily basis, in part, through the Partnership’s field supervision function, to mitigate the risk of non-compliance with regulatory requirements as well as any resulting negative impact on the Partnership’s reputation. To minimize the risk of regulatory non-compliance, each branch office is subject to an annual onsite branch audit, to review the financial advisor’s business and competency. Additionally, certain branches are visited or monitored regularly by field supervision directors to assure reasonable compliance. The Partnership’s Compliance division works with other business areas to advise and consult on business activities to help ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and Partnership policies. The Partnership also has established privacy policies to comply with privacy rules and regulations and trains its employees on privacy requirements, all of which come under the responsibility of the Partnership’s Chief Privacy Officer. The Partnership also has a Chief Information Security Officer who is responsible for information security policies and standards.  The Partnership has specific policiescontrols related to prevention of fraud and money laundering and provides initial as well as annual training and review of competency to help mitigate regulatory risks. The Partnership also has an anonymous ethics hotline to report other suspicious activity for review and disciplinary action when necessary. The Partnership’s Internal Audit division receives ethics hotline reports from a third-party provider, and the Compliance, Human Resources or Legal divisions investigate reports as they are received.

Strategic Risk

77

The Partnership seeks to address its strategic risks, most notably competition for clients and personnel in light of the increasing pace of industry change, through its initiatives to deliver enhanced value and impact for millions of current and potential clients, colleagues and communities. The Partnership is making significant investments to attract and retain qualified talent and offers a competitive compensation program and employee benefits for financial advisors, BTSMs and home office associates that promotes a long-term career, financial security and well-being. Firm leaders manage the execution of the Partnership's projects and initiatives through planning, goal setting, testing and monitoring to support successful implementation of its strategic initiatives and investments.

80


PART III

ITEMITEM 11. EXECUTIVEEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Partnership’s compensation program allocates profits to general partners, including members of its Executive Committee,ELT, primarily based upon their ownership interests in the Partnership. As general partners, Executive CommitteeELT members benefit annually from the profits of the Partnership through current cash payments from short-term results and from having an opportunity to continue to share in the long-term profitability of the organization. By owning general partnership interests, Executive CommitteeELT members are encouraged to balance short-term and long-term results of the Partnership as they have a significant amount of capital at risk. Also, by sharing in any annual operating loss of the Partnership, all general partners, including Executive CommitteeELT members, have a direct incentive to manage risk and focus on the short- and long-term financial results of the Partnership.

Compensation Components

The Executive CommitteeELT members’ compensation components are the same as the Partnership's other general partners. The components consist of base salary, deferred compensation, and allocations of Partnership net income. Executive CommitteeELT members do not receive bonuses, stock awards, option awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, or any other elements other than those disclosed below related to their capital ownership interest in the Partnership.

Salary – Each Executive CommitteeELT member receives an amount of fixed compensation in the form of annual salary. In establishing the salaries listed on the Summary Compensation Table, the Partnership considers individual experience, responsibilities and tenure. Because the Partnership’s principal compensation of Executive CommitteeELT members is from allocations of Partnership net income, it does not benchmark the compensation of its Executive CommitteeELT members with compensation to executives at other companies in setting its base salaries, or otherwise in determining the compensation to its Executive CommitteeELT members. Each Executive CommitteeELT member receives an annual salary ranging from $175,000 to $250,000.

Deferred Compensation – Each Executive CommitteeELT member is a participant in the Partnership’s profit sharing and 401(k) plan, a qualified deferred compensation plan, which also covers all eligible general partners and service partners of the Partnership and associates of the Partnership’s subsidiaries. Each Executive CommitteeELT member receives contributions based upon the overall profitability of the Partnership. Contributions to the plan are made annually at the discretion of the Partnership and have historically been determined based on approximately 24% of the Partnership’s net income before allocations to partners. Allocation of the Partnership’s contribution among participants is determined by each participant’s relative level of eligible earnings. The plan is a tax-qualified retirement plan.

Income Allocated to Partners – The majority of the Partnership's general partners’ compensation, including that of the Executive CommitteeELT members, comes from their capital ownership interests in the Partnership as general partners, subordinated limited partners and limited partners pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. Of the Partnership’s net income allocated to general partners, including the Executive CommitteeELT members, 92% is allocable based upon their respective general partner ownership interests in the Partnership. General partner ownership interests are set at the discretion of the Partnership’s Managing Partner, with input from the Executive Committee.ELT. General partner ownership interests held by each Executive CommitteeELT member ranged from 0.85%0.21% to 2.10% in 2022, 0.59% to 1.95% in 2019, 0.51%2021, and 0.98% to 1.90%2.0% in 2018, and 0.50% to 1.90% in 2017.2020. The remaining 8% of net income allocated to general partners is distributed based on merit and/or need as determined by the Managing Partner in consultation with the Executive Committee.  ELT. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership's net income allocated to subordinated limited partners and net income allocated to limited partners, including the applicable Executive CommitteeELT members, is allocated based upon their respective subordinated limited partner ownership interests and limited partner ownership interests in the Partnership. In addition, limited partners receive the 7.5% Payment pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. Subordinated limited partner ownership interests and limited partner ownership interests are set at the discretion of the Partnership's Managing Partner.


78

81


PART III

Item 11. Executive Compensation, Discussion and Analysis, continued

Summary Compensation Table

The following table identifies the compensation of the Partnership’s Managing Partner (“CEO”), the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and the three other most highly compensated Executive CommitteeELT members based on total compensation in 20192022 (including respective income allocation).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred

 

 

Allocated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

Salaries

 

 

Compensation

 

 

to Partners(1)

 

 

Total

 

Penny Pennington

 

2022

 

$

250,000

 

 

$

13,512

 

 

$

21,173,492

 

 

$

21,437,004

 

CEO

 

2021

 

 

250,000

 

 

 

14,906

 

 

 

22,302,931

 

 

 

22,567,837

 

 

 

2020

 

 

250,000

 

 

 

14,165

 

 

 

17,750,493

 

 

 

18,014,658

 

Andrew Miedler

 

2022

 

$

175,000

 

 

$

13,512

 

 

$

10,592,332

 

 

$

10,780,844

 

CFO

 

2021

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

14,906

 

 

 

8,471,817

 

 

 

8,661,723

 

Kenneth Cella, Jr.

 

2022

 

$

175,000

 

 

$

13,512

 

 

$

18,306,627

 

 

$

18,495,139

 

General Partner - Head of Branch Development

 

2021

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

14,906

 

 

 

20,524,505

 

 

 

20,714,411

 

 

 

2020

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

14,165

 

 

 

16,439,406

 

 

 

16,628,570

 

Kevin Bastien

 

2022

 

$

175,000

 

 

$

13,512

 

 

$

18,136,362

 

 

$

18,234,874

 

General Partner - Firm Strategy

 

2021

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

14,906

 

 

 

21,275,725

 

 

 

21,465,631

 

 

 

2020

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

14,165

 

 

 

16,857,259

 

 

 

17,046,424

 

Francis LaQuinta

 

2022

 

$

175,000

 

 

$

13,512

 

 

$

15,390,087

 

 

$

15,578,599

 

General Partner – Chief Information Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred

 

 

Allocated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

Salaries

 

 

Compensation

 

 

to Partners(1)

 

 

Total

 

Penny Pennington

 

2019

 

$

250,000

 

 

$

12,992

 

 

$

14,411,114

 

 

$

14,674,106

 

CEO

 

2018

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

12,760

 

 

 

11,482,713

 

 

 

11,670,473

 

 

 

2017

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

12,663

 

 

 

10,351,044

 

 

 

10,538,707

 

Kevin D. Bastien

 

2019

 

$

175,000

 

 

$

12,992

 

 

$

14,036,151

 

 

$

14,224,143

 

CFO

 

2018

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

12,760

 

 

 

13,205,746

 

 

 

13,393,506

 

 

 

2017

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

12,663

 

 

 

11,582,894

 

 

 

11,770,557

 

Kenneth R. Cella, Jr.

 

2019

 

$

175,000

 

 

$

12,992

 

 

$

12,951,990

 

 

 

13,139,982

 

General Partner - Client Strategies Group

 

2018

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

12,760

 

 

 

11,144,115

 

 

 

11,331,875

 

Vincent J. Ferrari

 

2019

 

$

175,000

 

 

$

12,992

 

 

$

9,046,112

 

 

$

9,234,104

 

General Partner – Firm Administration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel J. Timm

 

2019

 

$

175,000

 

 

$

12,992

 

 

$

10,850,083

 

 

 

11,038,075

 

General Partner - Branch Development

 

2018

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

12,760

 

 

 

11,041,723

 

 

 

11,229,483

 

 

 

2017

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

12,663

 

 

 

10,378,707

 

 

 

10,566,370

 

(1)
Income allocated to partners includes allocations from general partner, subordinated limited partner and limited partner capital ownership interests in the Partnership.

(1)

Income allocated to partners includes allocations from general partner, subordinated limited partner and limited partner capital ownership interests in the Partnership.  One Executive Committee member, Penny Pennington, received a portion of the 8% net income allocation in 2018 and 2017.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related regulations require the Partnership to disclose the ratio of the compensation of the Managing Partner and compensation of a median employee of the Partnership as calculated in accordance with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. Item 402(u) permits the Partnership to identify its median employee once every three years unless there has been significant change in compensation structure or overall number of employees, which the Partnership does not believe has occurred. Accordingly, the Partnership utilized the same median employee determined in the prior year for the current year ratio. The median employee was selected from a population that represented all employees as of December 31, 2017,2020, using salary and benefits, variable compensation, and allocations of Partnership net income as of December 31, 2016,2020, consistently applied across the employee population. After identifying the median employee, annual total compensation for the median employee and the Managing Partner was calculated using the same methodology as was used in the Summary Compensation Table above.

For 2019,2022, the median annual total compensation of all employees of the Partnership, including general partners and excluding the Managing Partner, was $75,543$91,384 and the annual total compensation of the Managing Partner was $14,674,106$21,437,004 or a ratio of 194235 to 1. The majority of the Managing Partner's total compensation is based on general partner and subordinated limited partner capital ownership interests in the Partnership as indicated above, compared to the compensation of a median employee which is primarily based on his or hertheir annual salary. This ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

79

82


PART III

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERSOWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table shows as of February 28, 2020,24, 2023, the ownership of limited partnership interests by each Executive CommitteeELT member named in the Summary Compensation Table and the Executive CommitteeELT members as a group:

Title of Class

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount

Beneficially

Owned

 

 

% of Class

 

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Penny Pennington

 

$

27,000

 

 

*

 

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Kevin D. Bastien

 

$

-

 

 

0%

 

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Kenneth R. Cella Jr.

 

$

115,600

 

 

*

 

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Vincent J. Ferrari

 

$

-

 

 

0%

 

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Daniel J. Timm

 

$

105,000

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited Partnership Interests

 

All Executive Committee Members

   as a Group (8 persons)

 

$

389,600

 

 

*

 

Title of Class

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount
Beneficially
Owned

 

 

% of Class

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Penny Pennington

 

$

27,000

 

 

*

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Andrew Miedler

 

$

40,000

 

 

*

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Kenneth Cella Jr.

 

$

115,600

 

 

*

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Kevin Bastien

 

$

-

 

 

0%

Limited Partnership Interests

 

Francis LaQuinta

 

$

-

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited Partnership Interests

 

All Enterprise Leadership Team Members
   as a Group (15 persons)

 

$

587,000

 

 

*

* Each of the ELT members named in the Summary Compensation Table and the ELT members as a group own less than 1% of the limited partnership interests outstanding.

Each of the Executive Committee members named in the Summary Compensation Table and the Executive Committee members as a group own less than 1% of the limited partnership interests outstanding.

In the ordinary course of its business the Partnership has extended credit to certain of its partners and employees in connection with their purchase of securities. Such extensions of credit have been made on substantially the same terms, including with respect to interest rates and collateral requirements, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. The Partnership also, from time to time and in the ordinary course of business, enters into transactions involving the purchase or sale of securities from or to partners or employees and members of their immediate families, as principal. Such purchases and sales of securities on a principal basis are affected on substantially the same terms as similar transactions with unaffiliated third parties. All amounts in the disclosures below are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

The Partnership leases approximately 10%11% of its branch office space from its financial advisors. The associated lease right-of-use assetassets and lease liabilityliabilities included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition were both $83 atas of December 31, 2019.2022 and 2021 were $105 and $106 and $95 and $96, respectively. Lease cost related to these leases was $34 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.  Rent$41, $37 and other lease-related expenses were $32 million and $30 million$35 for the years ended December 31, 20182022, 2021, and 2017,2020, respectively. These leases are executed and maintained in a similar manner as those entered into with third parties.

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners (otherand, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the Executive Committee)ELT) that desire financing for some or all of their new purchases of individual Partnership capital interests. See Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources for further information.

Policy for Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

The Partnership maintains a written policy with respect to related persons, which applies to transactions, arrangements or relationships (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) that are reportable by the Partnership under paragraph (a) of Item 404 of Regulation S-K in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000$120 thousand in any calendar year, and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. For purposes of the policy, the term ‘‘related person’’ has the meaning set forth in Item 404(a) of SEC Regulation S-K ‘‘Transactions with related persons, promoters and certain control persons’’.

Under the policy, the Partnership’s CFO or General Counsel will determine whether a transaction meets the requirements of a related person transaction pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K requiring approval by the Audit Committee. Transactions that fall within the definition will be referred to the Audit Committee for approval, ratification or other action. Based on its consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Audit Committee will decide whether or not to approve such transaction and will approve only those transactions that it determines are in the best interest of the Partnership. If the Partnership’s CFO or General Counsel becomes aware of an existing transaction with a related person which has not been approved under this policy, the matter will be referred to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will evaluate all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of such transaction.

As of December 31, 2019, the following transaction met the definition of a related person transaction pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.  This contract was subject to review by appropriate areas within the Partnership prior to execution.

80

83


PART III

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence, continued

TOC Artwork

On August 1, 2012, the Partnership entered into a vendor agreement with TOC Artwork to provide artwork in the Partnership’s branch offices through July 31, 2016.  This agreement was amended as of August 1, 2016 to extend the agreement through July 31, 2021.  TOC Artwork is 100% owned by Shelia Timm, Eric Timm and Ashley Mendez, spouse, son and daughter, respectively, of Daniel J. Timm, a member of the Partnership’s Executive Committee throughout 2019.  The total amount paid to TOC Artwork in 2019 pursuant to this agreement was approximately $451,000.

Family Relationships

The Partnership has an anti-nepotism policy in the home office.  However, the Partnershipoffice but encourages the recruitment of family and friends to be financial advisors and BOAs.BTSMs. As such, it is very common for family members to be employed by the Partnership and paid consistent with the compensation programs provided to other financial advisors and BOAs of the Partnership. The following summarizes Family Relationships with members of the Partnership’s Executive Committee.

Thomas P. Curran, a memberELT and their compensation as of the Partnership's Executive Committee, has a brother, Doug Curran, whoDecember 31, 2022, which was a financial advisor during 2019 (and presently).  Doug Curran earned approximately $350,000 during 2019 and has been employed by the Partnership for 19 years.  The compensation program under which he is paid is consistentconsistently with the compensation programs provided to other financial advisors of the Partnership.Partnership:

Mr. CurranKevin Bastien, a member of the Partnership's ELT during 2022, has another brother, Chris Curran,a son, Bryce Bastien, who was a financial advisor during 20192022 (and presently). Chris CurranBryce Bastien earned approximately $260,000$233 thousand during 20192022 and has been employed by the Partnership for eight4 years.  The compensation program under which he is paid is consistent with the compensation programs provided to other financial advisors of the Partnership.

Daniel J. Timm, a member of the Partnership’s Executive Committee during 2019, has a sister-in-law, Kim Renk, who was a financial advisor and general partner during 2019 (and presently).  Ms. Renk earned approximately $1,916,080 during 2019 and has been associated with the Partnership for 25 years.  The program under which Ms. Renk is paid is consistent with the programs provided to other general partner financial advisors of the Partnership.  Ms. Renk financed her Partnership capital contribution with a $1,232,000 Partnership loan.  During 2019, approximately $199,000 was paid to reduce the loan balance, through her share of general partnership earnings and other payments, and approximately $65,000 was paid in interest.  As of December 31, 2019, Ms. Renk's outstanding Partnership loan balance was $1,033,000, and the interest rate on the loan was 4.75%.  The terms of Ms. Renk's Partnership loan are consistent with the terms provided to other general partners.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table presents fees paidrendered by the Partnership to itsPartnership's independent registered public accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

($ thousands)

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

Audit fees

 

$

3,111

 

 

$

2,752

 

Audit-related fees(1)

 

 

1,370

 

 

 

1,299

 

Tax fees(2)

 

 

546

 

 

 

412

 

Other(3)

 

 

246

 

 

 

41

 

Total fees

 

$

5,273

 

 

$

4,504

 

($ thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Audit fees

 

$

2,827

 

 

$

2,743

 

Audit-related fees(1)

 

 

1,370

 

 

 

1,251

 

Tax fees(2)

 

 

814

 

 

 

1,834

 

Other(3)

 

 

7

 

 

 

6

 

Total fees

 

$

5,018

 

 

$

5,834

 

(1)
Audit-related fees consist primarily of fees for internal control reviews, attestation/agreed-upon procedures, employee benefit plan audits, and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
(2)
Tax fees consist of fees for services relating to tax compliance and other tax planning and advice.
(3)
Other primarily consists of fees for consulting services.

(1)

Audit-related fees consist primarily of fees for internal control reviews, attestation/agreed-upon procedures, employee benefit plan audits, and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

(2)

Tax fees consist of fees for services relating to tax compliance and other tax planning and advice.

(3)

Other primarily consists of fees for consulting services

The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit related services in fiscal years 20192022 and 2018.2021. No services were provided under the de minimis fee exception to the audit committee pre-approval requirements.

8184


PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

INDEXITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

INDEX

Page No.

(a)

(1)

The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8:

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

4445

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

4546

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021

4748

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020

4849

��

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partnership Capital Subject to Mandatory Redemption for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020

4950

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020

5051

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

5152

(2)

The following financial statements are included in Schedule I:

Parent Company Only Condensed Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021

8689

Parent Company Only Condensed Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020

8790

Parent Company Only Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020

8891

Other schedules are omitted because they are not required, inapplicable, or the information is otherwise shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

(b)

Exhibits

Reference is made to the Exhibit Index hereinafter contained.

85


EXHIBIT INDEX

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

ITEM 16.Exhibit Number

FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

82


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number

Description

    3.1

*

TwentiethTwenty-First Amended and Restated Agreement of Registered Limited Liability Limited Partnership, dated August 6, 2018,September 1, 2021, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 8-K dated August 6, 2018.filed on September 7, 2021.

    3.2

*

Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated January 24, 2019,February 22, 2022, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the fiscal yearquarterly period ended December 31, 2018.March 25, 2022.

    3.3

*

First Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated February 21, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

    3.4

*

Second Amendment of Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated March 24, 2022, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 25, 2019,2022.

    3.4

*

Second Amendment of Twenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated April 20, 2022, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.4 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2019.25, 2022.

    3.5

*

Third Amendment of Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated April 22, 2019,May 24, 2022, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.5 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2019.June 24, 2022.

    3.6

*

Fourth Amendment of Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated May 22, 2019,June 23, 2022, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.6 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2019.24, 2022.

    3.7

*

Fifth Amendment of Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated July 19, 2019,21, 2022, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.7 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2019.24, 2022.

    3.8

*

Sixth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated August 19, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.8 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2019.

   3.9

*

Seventh Amendment of Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated September 17, 2019,15, 2022, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.93.8 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.L.L.L.P Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2019.30, 2022.

   3.10    3.9

**

Seventh Amendment of Twenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated October 16, 2022, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.8 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2022.

    3.10

**

Eighth Amendment of Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated November 19, 2019.21, 2022.

    3.11

**

Ninth Amendment of Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated December 18, 2019.21, 2022.

    3.12

**

Tenth Amendment of Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated January 21,2020.25, 2023.

    3.13

**

Eleventh Amendment of Twenty-FirstTwenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated February 18,2020.23, 2023.

    4.1

**

Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended, of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.

83


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number

Description

    10.1

*

Lease between Eckelkamp Office Center South, L.L.C., a Missouri Limited Liability Company, as Landlord and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., as Tenant, dated February 3, 2000,L.L.L.P, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.2019.

86


EXHIBIT INDEX

   10.2    10.1

*

$500,000,000Credit Agreement dated as of September 28, 2018October 18, 2022, among The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. as borrowers and lenders Fifth Third Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationAssociation. incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to The Jones Financial Companies L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period September 28, 2018.30, 2022.

    10.3    10.2

*

Eleventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership Agreement of Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. dated March 10, 2010, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

    10.4    10.3

*

The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. 20182021 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-222541)333-261542) filed on January 12, 2018.December 8, 2021. (Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement)

    21.1

**

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

    23.1

**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    31.1

**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

    31.2

**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

    32.1

**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

    32.2

**

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

**

Inline XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL

**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF

**

Inline XBRL Extension Definition

101.LAB

**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label

101.PRE

**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

104

**

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

*

Incorporated by reference to previously filed exhibits.

**

Filed herewith.


* Incorporated by reference to previously filed exhibits.

** Filed herewith.


SIGNATURES

87


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

By:

/s/ Penny Pennington

Penny Pennington

Managing Partner (Principal Executive Officer)

March 12, 202010, 2023

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signatures

Title

Date

/s/ Penny Pennington

Managing Partner

March 12, 202010, 2023

Penny Pennington

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Kevin D. BastienAndrew T. Miedler

Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 202010, 2023

Kevin D. BastienAndrew T. Miedler

(Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer)

8588


Schedule I

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

(Parent Company Only)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

320

 

 

$

318

 

 

$

216

 

 

$

266

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment securities

 

 

2

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in subsidiaries

 

 

3,109

 

 

 

2,596

 

Investment in and receivable from subsidiaries

 

 

3,737

 

 

 

3,632

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

49

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

3,480

 

 

$

2,954

 

 

$

4,037

 

 

$

4,013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

$

116

 

 

$

99

 

 

$

218

 

 

$

258

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption

 

$

3,364

 

 

$

2,855

 

 

$

3,819

 

 

$

3,755

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

$

3,480

 

 

$

2,954

 

 

$

4,037

 

 

$

4,013

 

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., as well as the accompanying Note to the Parent Company Only Financial Statements of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.

8689


Schedule I

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

(Parent Company Only)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

NET REVENUE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsidiary earnings

 

$

1,064

 

 

$

970

 

 

$

858

 

 

$

1,386

 

 

$

1,593

 

 

$

1,271

 

Management fee income

 

 

1,411

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

2,391

 

 

 

2,395

 

 

 

1,852

 

Other

 

 

29

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

 

2,504

 

 

 

1,091

 

 

 

972

 

 

 

3,797

 

 

 

4,001

 

 

 

3,138

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

94

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue

 

 

2,410

 

 

 

1,024

 

 

 

905

 

 

 

3,705

 

 

 

3,909

 

 

 

3,045

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation and benefits

 

 

1,317

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

2,301

 

 

 

2,303

 

 

 

1,759

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

1,318

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

33

 

 

 

2,301

 

 

 

2,304

 

 

 

1,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE ALLOCATIONS TO PARTNERS

 

$

1,092

 

 

$

990

 

 

$

872

 

 

$

1,404

 

 

$

1,605

 

 

$

1,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocations to partners

 

 

(1,092

)

 

 

(990

)

 

 

(872

)

 

 

(1,404

)

 

 

(1,605

)

 

 

(1,285

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., as well as the accompanying Note to the Parent Company Only Financial Statements of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.

8790


Schedule I

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

(Parent Company Only)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2022

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by

operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before allocations to partners

 

 

1,092

 

 

 

990

 

 

 

872

 

 

 

1,404

 

 

 

1,605

 

 

 

1,285

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in subsidiaries

 

 

(513

)

 

 

(134

)

 

 

(312

)

 

 

58

 

 

 

(71

)

 

 

(1

)

Investment securities

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(105

)

 

 

(276

)

 

 

(247

)

Other assets

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

 

 

 

(27

)

 

 

14

 

 

 

(6

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

569

 

 

 

843

 

 

 

563

 

 

 

1,325

 

 

 

1,273

 

 

 

1,031

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayments of partnership loans

 

 

71

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

Issuance of partnership interests

 

 

432

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

50

 

Redemption of partnership interests

 

 

(216

)

 

 

(199

)

 

 

(193

)

 

 

(336

)

 

 

(260

)

 

 

(214

)

Distributions from partnership capital

 

 

(783

)

 

 

(694

)

 

 

(598

)

 

 

(1,173

)

 

 

(1,153

)

 

 

(864

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(567

)

 

 

(833

)

 

 

(711

)

 

 

(1,375

)

 

 

(1,330

)

 

 

(1,028

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

2

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

(148

)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(50

)

 

 

(57

)

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

 

318

 

 

 

308

 

 

 

456

 

 

 

266

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

320

 

End of year

 

$

320

 

 

$

318

 

 

$

308

 

 

$

216

 

 

$

266

 

 

$

323

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of general partnership interests through

partnership loans in current year

 

$

164

 

 

$

170

 

 

$

142

 

 

$

276

 

 

$

222

 

 

$

163

 

Repayment of partnership loans through distributions from

�� partnership capital in current year

 

$

136

 

 

$

135

 

 

$

111

 

Repayment of partnership loans through distributions from
partnership capital in current year

 

$

191

 

 

$

225

 

 

$

182

 

Declaration of distributions from subsidiary in current year

but received after year end

 

$

428

 

 

$

56

 

 

$

129

 

 

$

667

 

 

$

434

 

 

$

474

 

Declared distributions for retired partnership capital

in current year but unpaid at year end

 

$

109

 

 

$

97

 

 

$

 

Declared distributions for retired partnership capital
in current year but unpaid at year-end

 

$

219

 

 

$

254

 

 

$

145

 

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., as well as the accompanying Note to the Parent Company Only Financial Statements of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.

8891


Schedule I

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

Note to Parent Company Only Financial Statements

NOTE 1 – REVENUE AND EXPENSE

Beginning in 2019, theThe Partnership’s principal operating subsidiary, Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (“Edward Jones”), hadhas a written agreement with The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. (“JFC”) for the services of certain financial advisors who are service partners of JFC and not employees of Edward Jones. Pursuant to the agreement, Edward Jones made payments to the service partners of JFC on JFC's behalf for those services provided. This arrangement did not have an impact on net income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 but resulted in higher management fee income of $1.3$2.3 billion, $2.3 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively, offset by higher compensation expense of $1.3 billion.$2.3 billion, $2.3 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively.

92

89