☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes☐No☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes☐No☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☒No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of February ~~26, 2021~~25, 2022 (most recent month end), ~~1,237,109~~1,226,808 units of limited partnership interest (“Interests”) were outstanding, each representing $1,000 of limited partner capital. There is no0 public or private market for such Interests.

The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. (“JFC”) is a registered limited liability limited partnership organized under the Missouri Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act. Unless expressly stated, or the context otherwise requires, the terms “Registrant”, “Partnership” and ~~“Partnership”~~"Firm" refer to JFC and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. The Partnership’s principal operating subsidiary, Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (“Edward Jones”), was organized in February 1941 and reorganized as a limited partnership in May 1969. JFC was organized in June 1987 and, along with Edward Jones, was reorganized in August 1987.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Partnership operates in two geographic segments, the United States (“U.S.”) and Canada. Edward Jones is a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser in the U.S., and one of Edward Jones’ subsidiaries, Edward Jones (an Ontario limited partnership) ("EJ Canada") is a registered broker-dealer in Canada. JFC is the ultimate parent company of Edward Jones and is a holding company. Edward Jones is a retail brokerage business and primarily derives revenues from fees for providing investment advisory and other account services to its clients, fees for assets held by clients, the distribution of mutual fund shares and commissions for the purchase or sale of securities and the purchase of insurance products.The Partnership conducts business throughout the U.S. and Canada with its clients, various brokers, dealers, clearing organizations, depositories and banks.

The ~~Partnership strives~~Partnership's purpose is to partner for positive impact to improve the lives of its clients and colleagues and together better its communities and society. The Firm continues to strive to help serious, long-term investors achieve their financial goals by understanding their needs and implementing tailored solutions. ~~Edward Jones~~The Partnership aspires to provide goals-based advice to clients by understanding what is most important to ~~clients~~them and why, and connecting advice to those ~~goals,~~goals. The Partnership is making significant investments in human capital, technology infrastructure, digital initiatives, virtual business enablement tools, strategic relationships and ~~is investing in strategic initiatives~~test and learn pilot programs, to ~~enhance the client experience.~~ deliver enhanced value for its clients, branch teams and home office associates.

For financial information related to segments for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, see Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1615 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Exhibit 21.1 for a listing of the Partnership’s subsidiaries and affiliates.

Branch Office Network.The Partnership primarily serves serious, long-term individual investors through its extensive network of branch offices. The Partnership's business model is designed to serve clients through personal relationships with financial advisors and branch office administrators ("BOAs") located in the communities where clients live and work. Financial advisors and BOAs provide tailored solutions and services to clients while leveraging the resources of the Partnership's home office. The Partnership operated ~~15,361~~15,525 branch offices as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, primarily staffed by a single financial advisor and a ~~BOA. Of this total, the Partnership operated 14,667~~BOA; 14,856 branch offices in the U.S. (located in all 50 states) and ~~694~~669 branch offices in Canada.

Governance. Unlike a corporation, the Partnership is not governed by a board of directors and has no individuals who are designated as directors. Moreover, none of its securities are listed on a securities exchange and therefore certain governance requirements that generally apply to many companies that file periodic reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) do not apply to it. Under the terms of the Partnership’s ~~Twentieth~~Twenty-First Amended and Restated Agreement of Registered Limited Liability Limited Partnership, dated ~~August 6, 2018,~~September 1, 2021, (the “Partnership Agreement”), the Partnership’s Managing Partner (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) has primary responsibility for administering the Partnership’s business, determining its policies, and controlling the management and conduct of the Partnership's

business. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Managing Partner's powers include, without limitation, the power to admit and dismiss general partners of JFC and the power to adjust the proportion of their respective interests in JFC. As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, JFC was composed of ~~24,020~~23,559 individual partners, many of whom hold more than one type of partnership interest. Of those individuals, as of December 31, ~~2020, 421~~2021, 536 were general partners and ~~23,897~~23,426 were limited partners, ~~2,782~~2,924 of whom are also service partners, and ~~529~~570 were subordinated limited partners. Each service partner must also be a financial advisor and a general partner or a limited partner. Service partners are ~~financial advisors but~~ not employees of the Partnership and do not hold capital interests in addition to their general, limited or subordinated limited partnership interests. ~~As of February 26, 2021, JFC was composed of 23,967 individual partners, of whom 586 were~~Effective January 1, 2022, the Partnership admitted 53 new general partners ~~and 23,839 were limited partners, 2,975~~for a total of whom are also service partners, and 570 were subordinated limited partners. The partner counts include all new partners admitted to each partnership class after year end. In 2021, all financial advisors serving as regional leaders who were not previously general partners became589 general partners. See Part III, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance for a description of the governance structure of the Partnership.

Revenues by Source. The following table sets forth the sources of the Partnership’s revenues for the past three years. Due to the interdependence of the activities and departments of the Partnership’s business and the inherently subjective assumptions required to allocate overhead, it is impractical to identify and specify expenses applicable to each aspect of the Partnership’s operations. Further information on revenue related to the Partnership’s segments is provided in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1615 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The Partnership earns program fees from investment advisory services offered in the U.S. through the Edward Jones Advisory Solutions® program (“Advisory Solutions”) and the Edward Jones Guided Solutions® program ("Guided Solutions") and in Canada through the Edward Jones Portfolio Program® (“Portfolio Program”) and the Edward Jones Guided Portfolios® program (“Guided Portfolios”). Advisory Solutions and Guided Solutions are both investment advisory programs created under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). Portfolio Program and Guided Portfolios are not subject to the Advisers Act as services from these programs are only offered in Canada. Program fees are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program, as well as contractual rates. These fees are impacted by changes in market values of the assets and client dollars invested in and divested from the accounts.

Through Advisory Solutions, financial advisors provide investment advisory services to clients for an annual fee based upon the average daily market value of their assets in the program. Clients can choose to invest in Advisory Solutions Fund Models, which invest in affiliated mutual funds, unaffiliated mutual funds, and exchange-traded funds or Advisory Solutions Unified Managed Account Models, which also includes separately managed allocations. When investing in Advisory Solutions, the client may elect either a research or a custom model. If the client elects a research model, the Partnership assumes full investment discretion on the account and the client assets will be invested in one of numerous different research models developed and managed by Edward Jones. If the client elects to build a custom model, the Partnership assumes limited investment discretion on the account, and the investments are selected by the client and ~~his or her~~their financial advisor. The vast majority of client assets within Advisory Solutions are invested in research models.

The Partnership formed the Bridge Builder® Trust (the "BB Trust") to accommodate the size and expected growth in investment advisory services offered through Advisory Solutions, to reduce the concentration of client investments in third party funds and to lower client investment management expenses. The BB Trust has eight active sub-advised mutual funds in its series currently available for Advisory Solutions clients. The BB Trust filed a preliminary registration statement for three new funds with the SEC on February 25, 2022, and may add additional funds in the future, at its discretion. Olive Street Investment Advisers, LLC ("Olive Street"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of JFC, is the investment

adviser to the eight sub-advised mutual funds of the BB Trust and has primary responsibility for setting the overall investment strategies and for selecting and managing sub-advisers, subject to the review and approval of the BB Trust's Board of Trustees. The BB Trust pays Olive Street for performing investment advisory services and Olive Street pays fees to the sub-advisers of the funds in the BB Trust. Olive Street has contractually agreed to waive any investment advisory fees which exceed the investment advisory fees paid to sub-advisers, resulting in no impact on the Partnership's net income.

Guided Solutions is a client-directed advisory program where financial advisors work with clients to build a portfolio that is aligned with the Partnership's investment philosophy and guidance. Clients retain control over investment decisions and financial advisors help guide clients through a required process of identifying their financial goals and selecting an appropriate portfolio objective. Guided Solutions offers two options, a Fund account or Flex account, which provide different investment options depending on a client's account size. The Partnership earns an annual fee based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program. The sub-advised mutual funds of the BB Trust are not currently eligible investments in Guided Solutions.

Through the Portfolio Program, Canadian financial advisors provide discretionary investment advisory services to clients by using independent investment managers and proprietary asset allocation models. Guided Portfolios is a non-discretionary, fee-based program with structured investment guidelines available to Canadian ~~Investors.~~investors. Fees for these programs are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program as well as the portfolio model selected.

The Partnership also earns revenue on clients’ assets through service fees and other revenues received under agreements with mutual fund and insurance companies. The fees generally range from 15 to 25 basis points (0.15% to 0.25%) but can be up to 100 basis points (1.00%) of the value of the client assets.

The Partnership earns revenue sharing from certain mutual fund and insurance companies. In most cases, this is additional compensation paid by investment advisers, insurance companies or distributors based on a percentage of average assets held by the Partnership’s clients.

In addition to the advisory programs mentioned above, the Partnership earns asset-based fees from the trust services and investment management services offered to its clients through Edward Jones Trust Company (“Trust Co.”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of JFC.

Asset-based fee revenue also includes investment management fees earned by Passport Research, Ltd. ("Passport Research"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Edward Jones, as the investment adviser to the Edward Jones Money Market Fund (the "Money Market Fund"). Edward Jones also earns certain asset-based fees from the Money Market Fund, some or all of which may be voluntarily waived.

Account and activity fees include shareholder accounting service fees, insurance contract service fees, Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) custodial service fees, and other product/service fees. Account and activity fees and other revenue are impacted by the number of client accounts and the types of services provided to those accounts, among other factors.

The Partnership charges fees to certain mutual fund companies for shareholder accounting services, including maintaining client account information and providing other administrative services for the mutual funds. Insurance contract service fees are fees charged to certain insurance companies for administrative support. The Partnership acts as the custodian for clients’ IRAs and the clients are charged an annual fee for this and other account services. Account and activity fees also include sales-based revenue sharing fees and various transaction fees.

Edward Jones also earns certain account and activity fees from the Money Market Fund, some or all of which may be voluntarily waived.

Trade revenue is composed of commissions earned from the distribution of mutual fund shares, the purchase or sale of ~~mutual fund shares,~~ equities and the purchase of insurance products, as well as principal transactions. Trade revenue is impacted by ~~the number of financial advisors,~~ trading volume ~~(client~~of client dollars ~~invested),~~invested, mix of the products in which clients invest, size of trades, margins earned on the transactions, and market volatility.

Commissions. As a distributor of mutual fund shares, the Partnership receives a selling concession which generally ranges from 1% to 5% of the purchase price, ~~of the shares,~~ depending on the terms of each ~~fund’s~~fund's prospectus, ~~and~~including varying rates based on the ~~amount~~client's assets under care ("AUC") within a fund family, inclusive of the ~~purchase.~~purchase price. The Partnership also receives a commission when it acts as an agent for a client in the purchase or sale of securities. The commission is based on the value of the securities purchased or sold. In addition, the Partnership sells life insurance, long-term care insurance, disability insurance, fixed and variable annuities and other types of insurance products of unaffiliated insurance companies to its clients through its financial advisors who hold insurance sales licenses. As an agent for the insurance companies, the Partnership receives commissions on the premiums paid for the products.

Principal Transactions. Revenue is primarily earned from the Partnership's distribution of and participation in principal trading activities in municipal obligations, over-the-counter corporate obligations and certificates of deposit. The Partnership’s principal trading activities are conducted with other dealers where the Partnership acts as a dealer buying from and selling to its clients. In principal trading of securities, the Partnership exposes its capital to the risk of fluctuation in the fair value of its security positions. The Partnership maintains securities positions in inventory solely to support its business of buying securities from and selling securities to its retail clients and does not seek to profit by engaging in proprietary trading for its own account. The related unrealized gains and losses for these securities are recorded within trade revenue. Also included within principal transactions revenue is revenue derived from the Partnership's distribution of unit investment trusts and participation as a syndicate member in underwriting activities.

Interest and dividends revenue is earned on client margin ~~(loan)~~loan account balances, cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Partnership loans and investment securities and inventory securities. Loans secured by securities held in client margin accounts provide a source of income to the Partnership. The Partnership is permitted to use securities owned by margin clients having an aggregate market value of generally up to 140% of the debit balance in margin accounts as collateral for the borrowings. The Partnership may also use funds provided by free credit balances in client accounts to finance client margin account borrowings.

~~The Partnership’s interest income~~ is impacted by the ~~level of client margin account balances, cash~~balance size and ~~cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Partnership loans, investment securities and inventory securities and the~~ interest rates earned on each.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Partnership distributed mutual funds for approximately ~~110~~124 mutual fund companies. One company, American Funds Distributors, Inc. and its affiliates, represented ~~13%~~12% of the Partnership’s total revenue for the year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. The revenue generated from this company relates to business conducted with the Partnership’s U.S. segment.

Branch Development. The Partnership's Branch Development division is responsible for selecting and enabling branch teams, ~~which typically consist of a financial advisor and BOA,~~ whose goal is to start, build and optimize the client experience. Branch Development supports the Partnership by attracting and hiring high-quality talent, onboarding and developing branch teams, developing leaders and associates in ~~both the home office and in~~ the field, and optimizing and supporting branch team performance.

Client Strategies Group. The Partnership's Client Strategies Group focuses on ensuring clients are on track to achieve their financial goals through ~~collaboration of marketing,~~ advice, products, planning and ~~guidance~~, ~~products, tools~~ ~~and solutions support.~~ services. The division's role is to understand the needs of clients and investors,, provide perspective and recommendations that align with the firm's investment philosophy and offer a broad supply of quality products,, solutions and tools that enable branch teams to successfully deliver tailored advice to meet client needs.

Client Account Administration, Operations and Service. The Partnership has an Operations division that is responsible for activities relating to client onboarding, asset movement, trading, custody and client reporting. The division also facilitates activities relating to client securities and the processing of transactions with other broker-dealers, exchanges and clearing organizations. These activities include receipt, identification and delivery of funds and securities, internal financial controls, accounting functions and office ~~services, custody of client securities and handling of margin accounts.~~services.

The volume of transactions the Partnership processes fluctuates considerably. The Partnership records such transactions and posts its books and records on a daily basis. The Partnership has ~~a computerized~~an electronic branch office communication system which is principally utilized for entry of security orders, quotations, ~~messages~~communication between offices, research of various client account information, and cash and security receipts functions. Home office personnel, including those in the Operations and Compliance divisions, monitor day-to-day operations to determine compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Failure to keep current and accurate books and records can render the Partnership liable to disciplinary action by governmental and self-regulatory organizations (“SROs”).

The Partnership clears and settles virtually all of its equity, municipal bond, corporate bond, mutual fund and annuity transactions for its U.S. broker-dealer through the National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”), Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) and Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), which are all subsidiaries of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation located in New York, New York.

In conjunction with clearing and settling transactions with NSCC, the Partnership holds client securities on deposit with DTC in lieu of maintaining physical custody of the certificates. The Partnership uses a major bank for custody and settlement of U.S. treasury securities and Government National Mortgage Association, Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation issues. The Partnership also uses a major bank for custody and settlement of foreign ~~securities.~~securities transactions. Mutual funds do not have physical certificates and are custodied with the individual mutual fund companies.

~~The Partnership's~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ handles the routing and settlement of client transactions. In addition, ~~the Partnership's~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ is a member of the Canadian Depository of Securities (“CDS”) and FundServ for clearing and settlement of transactions. CDS effects clearing of securities on the Canadian National Stock Exchange, Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and TSX Venture Exchange (“CDNX”). Client securities on deposit are also held with CDS and National Bank Correspondent Network.

The Partnership is substantially dependent upon the operational capacity and ability of NSCC, DTC, FICC, and CDS. Any serious delays in the processing of securities transactions encountered by these clearing and depository companies may result in delays of delivery of cash or securities to the Partnership’s clients.

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), along with its U.S. business, Securities Processing Solutions, U.S., and its international business, Securities Processing Solutions, International, provide automated data processing services for client account activity and related records for the Partnership in the U.S. and Canada, respectively. The Partnership also utilizes certain products and services of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”) for mutual fund investments held by the Partnership’s clients and for certain trading activities. The Partnership has arrangements with other brokers to execute certain equity and fixed income orders. For orders in Canada, the Partnership transacts directly on the exchanges in an agency capacity.

EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ has an agreement with Computershare Trust Company of Canada to act as trustee for clients' registered retirement accounts, including holding cash balances within retirement accounts. ~~The~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ is the custodian for client securities and manages all related securities and cash processing, such as trades, dividends, corporate actions, client cash receipts and disbursements, client tax reporting for certain holdings and statements.

The Partnership's Service division leads the delivery of service support from the home office to assist ~~the~~ branch ~~team's success~~team and ~~enhance the~~ client ~~experience.~~success.

Competition. The Partnership is subject to intense competition in all phases of its business from other securities firms, some of which are larger than the Partnership in terms of capital, resources, brokerage volume and range of financial ~~services. In addition, the Partnership encounters competition from other organizations such as banks, insurance companies, and others offering financial~~ services and ~~advice.~~some of which are "fintech" companies that have technological advancements that allow them to compete through internet- and mobile-based platforms. The ~~Partnership also competes with firms of all sizes offering discount~~

brokerage services, usually with lower levels of personalized service to individual clients, including major competitors that offer zero commissions for the purchases and sales of stocks, ETFs and other brokerage products. Further, the financial services industry continues to evolve technologically, with an increasing number of firms of all sizes providing lower cost, computer-based "robo-advice" with limited or no personalized service to clients or to supplement full-service offerings. The Partnership also competes with firms of all sizes offering discount brokerage services, usually with lower levels of personalized service to individual clients, including major competitors that offer zero commissions for the purchases and sales of stocks, ETFs and other brokerage products. Clients ~~are able to~~can transfer their business to competing organizations at any time. In addition, the Partnership encounters competition from other organizations, such as banks, insurance companies, and others offering financial services. There is also intense competition among firms ~~for~~to attract and retain qualified professionals, including financial ~~advisors.~~advisors, BOAs and home office associates. The Partnership experiences continued efforts by competing firms to hire away its financial advisors, although the Partnership believes its rate of attrition of financial advisors is in line with comparable firms.

Human Capital. The Partnership’s purpose is to partner for positive impact to improve the ~~well-being~~lives of its clients and colleagues and totogether better its communities and society. Helping associates make a positive impact in the lives of clients, colleagues and communities starts with the care and support the Partnership provides for its associates' well-being. The Partnership is committed to providing comprehensive benefits and flexible work arrangements to meet the needs of its associates.

The Partnership's revenues are generated by our financial advisors and BOAs serving clients with the support of our home office associates. To have successful branch teams, the Partnership continually invests resources into supporting the one-on-one relationship between each branch team and each client. This single-minded focus is the heart of the Partnership's unique branch-team model that supports its client-first mission.

Delivering on the client-first business model goes hand-in-hand with investing in training and development. The Partnership is committed to helping financial advisors, BOAs and home office associates on their career path, providing opportunities from formal training and coaching to mentoring programs, leadership opportunities and tuition reimbursement. Engagement and branch experience surveys are regularly conducted to listen to associates and branch teams to allow the Partnership to take timely actions to optimize their engagement, which helps the Partnership better serve each other and our clients.

The Partnership maintains a comprehensive training program for financial advisors which includes preparation for regulatory exams, on-line modules, concentrated instruction in a face-to-face or virtual classroom and on-the-job training in a branch office. During the first phase, U.S. and Canada trainees study for and take the requisite examinations. After passing the requisite examinations, trainees complete on-line modules and a comprehensive training program either virtually or in one of the Partnership’s home office training facilities, followed by on-the-job training in their respective markets in nearby branch locations. Branch training includes reviewing investments, compliance requirements and office procedures, understanding client needs, establishing a base of potential clients and serving clients. Multiple field-based leaders provide in-region mentorship, training and coaching to trainees to assist their assimilation into the firm and the industry. The Partnership offers ongoing training to financial advisors for the entirety of their careers. These training programs continue to focus on meeting client needs and effective management of the branch office.

The Partnership values and respects the contributions of financial advisors, BOAs and home office associates and recognizes individual efforts through a compensation program that promotes a long-term career, financial security and well-being. Employee compensation consists of a base pay with a bonus program and retirement plan for eligible employees. Financial advisors are generally compensated on a commission basis and may be entitled to bonus compensation based on their respective branch office profitability and the profitability of the Partnership. The Partnership pays bonuses to its non-financial advisor employees pursuant to a discretionary formula established by management based on the profitability of the Partnership. The retirement plan consists of a profit-sharing contribution tied to the Partnership's profitability and a 401(k) contribution. The Partnership also makes a significant investment in subsidizing health and wellness benefits to offer full-time associates access to a benefit plan with the opportunity to earn medical plan premium discounts. Additionally, in response to the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the Partnership offered and continues to offer additional paid time off to associates personally affected by COVID-19 and a medical plan that includes coverage for COVID-19 related testing, vaccinations and treatment.

The Partnership considers itself to have good employee relations and believes that its compensation and employee benefits, which include medical, life and disability insurance plans, and benefit plans, are competitive with those offered by other firms principally engaged in the securities business. As part of its efforts to promote pay equity, the Partnership has implemented measures in its U.S. home offices such as routinely benchmarking roles against market comparables, increasing pay transparency for applicants and associates, setting pay ranges based on skills and experience, applying consistent processes for annual merit increases and bonuses and driving additional ongoing and future improvements.

Inclusive behavior and inclusive leadership are ~~woven~~integrated into ~~the fabric of~~ the Partnership's core values. Leaders are ~~held accountable~~responsible for ~~creating an inclusive environment, to ensure~~hiring and developing their teams, with the ~~focus~~Partnership supplying guidance on ~~inclusion, diversity~~assembling diverse candidate slates and ~~belonging does not waver. Financial~~information about area-specific hiring and retention opportunities. Certain financial advisors also take on inclusion leader roles in their geographic areas and develop a tailored plan which supports the growth, performance, engagement and leadership development of women and diverse financial advisors within their specific markets. The Partnership also has an advisory group of diverse financial advisors, BOAs and home office associates who offer perspective and input to help advance certain DEI efforts. In addition, the Partnership has ~~several~~ Business Resource Groups ~~comprised of associates and leaders~~ who volunteer to support inclusion and diversity ~~efforts, including, among others, Black/African Americans, LGBT+ and Young Professionals.~~efforts. Members regularly meet to cultivate relationships, generate ideas, and develop strategies to build and retain an inclusive workforce.

Additionally, the Partnership is continuously working to improve options to support associates seeking to voluntarily self-identify their disabilities. The Partnership also has ~~an Inclusion~~dedicated a team to design accessible digital experiences for clients and ~~Diversity Mentoring Program which is a resource~~colleagues.

As of December 31, 2021, 10% and 62% of the Partnership's total employees, composed of financial advisors, BOAs and home office associates, were self-identified people of color and women, respectively. The following table summarizes the Partnership's DEI goals for the ~~professional~~end of 2025 and ~~personal growth~~progress made towards those goals as of ~~all associates and helps create relationships across all dimensions of diversity.~~December 31, 2021:

The Partnership ~~remains committed~~ended 2021 with 18,823 financial advisors, a decrease of 402 compared to ~~financial advisor growth to continue to serve existing clients and future clients and create a positive impact in our communities. However, in response~~2020. This was due to the ~~COVID-19 pandemic during 2020, the~~ Partnership ~~implemented measures to optimize firm resources and control costs, including~~gradually restarting hiring following a temporary pause on the recruitment of non-licensed financial ~~advisors. This may have an ongoing impact on the financial advisor growth rate in 2021. Despite the temporary hiring pause, the Partnership grew the number of financial~~ advisors ~~3% to 19,225~~ in 2020, ~~compared to 2019. The Partnership monitors financial advisor attrition rates. In 2020, the financial advisor attrition rate was 6.7%, a decrease from 8.8% in 2019.~~

~~The Partnership plans to continue~~together with an intentional strategy to grow its impact by focusing on hiring both experienced financial advisors and non-licensed candidates in future periods and increasing the number of clients and communities it serves. Currently, the Partnership is gradually restarting hiring to enable it to prioritize support for all financial advisors, which may result in fewer financial advisors hired than historically experienced. The Partnership is committed to an innovative and intentional strategy that offersoffering a plan and resources for both current financial advisors and new ~~hires. Additionally,~~hires to promote branch team success. In 2021, the ~~Partnership continues to make investments~~financial advisor attrition rate was 6.6%, a slight decrease from 6.7% in ~~virtual business enablement tools to help its branch teams be successful with the ongoing limitations on in-person client prospecting and consultations.~~2020.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Partnership had ~~approximately~~approximately 50,000 full-time and part-time employees and partners, including its ~~19,225~~18,823 financial advisors. The Partnership’s financial advisors are employees or partners of the Partnership. Service partners are financial advisors, but not employees of the Partnership.

Refer to Part II, Item 7 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more information about ~~these~~ key metrics and historical growth and attrition rates for financial advisors.

Broker-Dealer and Investment Adviser Regulation. The securities industry is subject to extensive federal and state laws, rules and regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including sales methods, trade practices among broker-dealers, use and safekeeping of client funds and securities, client payment and margin requirements, capital structure of securities firms, record-keeping, standards of care, and the conduct of directors, officers and employees.

The SEC is the U.S. agency responsible for the administration of the federal securities laws. Its mission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly and efficient markets and facilitate capital formation. Edward Jones is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC. Edward Jones is subject to periodic examinations by the SEC, review by a designated examining authority and certain periodic and ad hoc reporting requirements of securities and customer funds. Much of the

regulation of broker-dealers has been delegated by the SEC to SROs, principally the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"). FINRA adopts rules (which are subject to approval by the SEC) that govern the broker-dealer industry and conducts periodic examinations of Edward Jones’ operations.

Securities firms are also subject to regulation by securities and insurance regulators in each U.S. state (as well as the District of Columbia) and U.S. territory where they conduct business. Since Edward Jones is registered as a broker-dealer and sells insurance products in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, Edward Jones is subject to regulation in each of these jurisdictions.

The SEC, SROs, state authorities and other regulators may conduct administrative proceedings which can result in censure, fine, suspension or expulsion of a securities firm, its officers or employees. Edward Jones has in the past been, and may in the future be, the subject of regulatory actions by various agencies that have the authority to regulate its activities (see Part I, Item 3 – Legal Proceedings for more information).

As an investment dealer registered in all provinces and territories of Canada, ~~the Partnership's~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ is subject to provincial, territorial and federal laws. All provinces and territorial jurisdictions have established securities administrators to administer securities laws. ~~The Partnership's~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ is also subject to the regulation of the Canada SRO, the Investment Industry Regulation Organization of Canada ("IIROC"), which oversees the business conduct and financial affairs of its member firms, as well as all trading activity on debt and equity marketplaces in Canada. IIROC fulfills its regulatory obligations by implementing and enforcing rules regarding the proficiency, business and financial conduct of member firms and their registered employees, and marketplace integrity rules regarding trading activity on Canada debt and equity marketplaces.

In addition, Edward Jones, Olive Street and Passport Research are subject to the rules and regulations promulgated under the Advisers Act, which requires certain investment advisers to register with the SEC. Edward Jones, Olive Street and Passport Research are registered investment advisers with the SEC. The rules and regulations promulgated under the Advisers Act govern all aspects of the investment advisory business, including registration, trading practices, custody of client funds and securities, record-keeping, advertising and business conduct. Edward Jones, Olive Street and Passport Research are subject to periodic examinations by the SEC, which is authorized to institute proceedings and impose sanctions for violations of the Advisers Act.

Pursuant to U.S. federal law, Edward Jones as a broker-dealer belongs to the Securities Investors Protection Corporation (“SIPC”). For clients in the U.S., SIPC provides $500,000 of coverage for missing cash and securities in a client's account, with a maximum of $250,000 for cash claims. Pursuant to IIROC requirements, ~~the Partnership's~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ belongs to the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (“CIPF”), a non-profit organization that provides investor protection for investment dealer insolvency. For clients in Canada, CIPF limits coverage to C$1,000,000 in total, which can be any combination of securities and cash.

The Partnership currently maintains additional protection for U.S. clients through a contract with Underwriters at Lloyd’s, which protects clients’ accounts in excess of the SIPC coverage subject to specified limits. This policy covers theft, misplacement, destruction, burglary, embezzlement or abstraction of cash and client securities up to an aggregate limit of $900,000,000 (with maximum cash coverage limited to $1,900,000 per client) for covered claims of all U.S. clients of Edward Jones. Market losses are not covered by SIPC or the additional protection. In addition, the Partnership has cash and investments segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit for U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 (“Customer Protection Rule”) ofunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act").

Employees and partners of the Partnership in the U.S. are bonded under a blanket fidelity bond. The Partnership has an aggregate annual coverage of $50,000,000 subject to deductibles. Employees and partners of the Partnership in Canada are bonded under a blanket policy as required by IIROC. The Partnership has an annual aggregate amount of coverage in Canada of C$50,000,000 with a per occurrence limit of C$25,000,000, subject to a deductible.

Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), the Department of Labor ("DOL") has rulemaking authority over retirement savings, which includes retirement accounts and retirement plans, and regulatory authority over retirement plans.

Additional legislation, changes in rules promulgated by the SEC, the DOL, SROs, state authorities and other regulators, and/or changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules, may directly affect the operations and profitability of broker-dealers and investment advisers. See Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors – Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives for additional information.

Regulation of Trust Co. and Regulation of JFC as Trust Co.’s Parent. Trust Co. is a federally chartered savings and loan association that operates under a limited purpose “trust-only” charter, which generally restricts Trust Co. to acting solely in a custodial or fiduciary capacity, including as a trustee. Trust Co. is subject to supervision and regulation by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”).

Uniform Net Capital Rule. As a result of its activities as a U.S. broker-dealer and a member firm of FINRA, Edward Jones is subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 (“Uniform Net Capital Rule”) of the Exchange Act which is designed to measure the general financial integrity and liquidity of a broker-dealer and the minimum net capital deemed necessary to meet the broker-dealer’s continuing commitments to its clients. The Uniform Net Capital Rule provides for two methods of computing net capital. Edward Jones has adopted what is generally referred to as the alternative method. Minimum required net capital under the alternative method is equal to the greater of $250,000 or 2% of the aggregate debit items, as defined under the Customer Protection Rule. The Uniform Net Capital Rule prohibits withdrawal of equity capital whether by payment of dividends, repurchase of stock or other means, if net capital would thereafter be less than minimum requirements. Additionally, certain withdrawals require the approval of the SEC and FINRA to the extent they exceed defined levels even though such withdrawals would not cause net capital to be less than 5% of aggregate debit items. In computing net capital, various adjustments are made to exclude assets which are not readily convertible into cash and to provide a conservative valuation of other assets, such as securities owned. Failure to maintain the required net capital may subject Edward Jones to suspension or expulsion by FINRA, the SEC and other regulatory bodies and/or exchanges and may ultimately require liquidation. Edward Jones has, at all times, been in compliance with the Uniform Net Capital Rule.

~~The Partnership's~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ and Trust Co. are also required to maintain specified levels of regulatory capital. Each of these subsidiaries has, at all times, been in compliance with the applicable capital requirements in the jurisdictions in which it operates.

Customer Protection Rule. As a result of its activities as a broker-dealer and a member firm of FINRA, Edward Jones is subject to the Customer Protection Rule which is designed to ensure that customer securities and funds in a broker-dealer's custody are adequately safeguarded. The Customer Protection Rule requires broker-dealers to promptly obtain and maintain physical possession or control of all fully paid and excess margin securities and to segregate all customer cash or money obtained from the use of customer property that has not been used to finance transactions of other customers. Combined, these requirements substantially limit a broker-dealer's ability to use customer securities and restrict a broker-dealer to only use customer cash or margin securities for activities directly related to financing customer securities purchases. Edward Jones has, at all times, been in compliance with the Customer Protection Rule.

SEC Rules and Guidance on the Standards of Conduct for Investment Professionals ~~(the~~(the "Rules and Guidance") and Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA") Amendments. As a U.S. broker-dealer, Edward Jones is subject to Regulation Best Interest, which establishes a standard of care for broker-dealers that includes acting in the best interest of their brokerage clients when making a recommendation and addressing conflicts of interest. Edward Jones is also subject to the SEC rule requiring registered investment advisers and broker-dealers to deliver a Form CRS Relationship Summary to their clients informing them of the types of client relationships offered, together with the applicable standards of care, and information on fees, costs, conflicts of interest, and legal and disciplinary history. The SEC has also issued guidance clarifying the "fiduciary" standard of care applicable to investment advisers and advisory clients and guidance clarifying what broker-dealer activities are excluded from the definition of "investment adviser." Edward Jones has, ~~implemented measures~~at all times, maintained policies and procedures to comply with the Rules and ~~Guidance as~~Guidance.

As a Canadian broker-dealer, EJ Canada is subject to National Instrument 31-103, "Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations," including the CSA's recent amendments to registrant conduct requirements ("the Client Focused Reforms"), many of ~~their June 30, 2020 compliance date.~~which are similar to the SEC's Rules and Guidance. The amendments became effective over a two-year phased implementation concluding December 31, 2021. The Partnership implemented measures to address the Client Focused Reforms.

The Partnership files annual, quarterly, and current reports and other information with the SEC. The Partnership’s SEC filings are available to the public on the SEC’s website at www.sec.govand on our website at www.edwardjones.com.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in particular Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of U.S. securities laws. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “will,” “should,” and other expressions which predict or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters. You should not rely on forward-looking statements, because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the control of the Partnership. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Partnership to be materially different from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Some of the factors that might cause differences between forward-looking statements and actual events include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) general economic conditions, including inflation, an economic downturn or volatility in the U.S. and/or global securities markets, ~~and~~ actions of the U.S. Federal Reserve and/or central banks outside of the United ~~States;~~States and economic effects of international geopolitical conflicts; (2) the COVID-19 pandemic and the global governmental response, vaccination and related impact on society, the global economy and volatility in financial markets; (3) regulatory actions; ~~(3)~~(4) changes in legislation or regulation; ~~(4)~~(5) actions of competitors; ~~(5)~~(6) litigation; ~~(6)~~(7) the ability of clients, other broker-dealers, banks, depositories and clearing organizations to fulfill contractual obligations; ~~(7)~~(8) changes in interest rates; ~~(8)~~(9) changes in technology and other technology-related risks; ~~(9)~~(10) a fluctuation or decline in the fair value of securities; ~~(10)~~(11) our ability to attract and retain qualified financial advisors and other employees; and ~~(11)~~(12) the risks discussed under Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors. These forward-looking statements were based on information, plans, and estimates at the date of this report, and the Partnership does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, future events or other changes.

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the global governmental response, vaccine distribution, and related impact on society and the economy have resulted in significant uncertainty in the global economy and volatility in financial markets. ~~Further economic and market events related to COVID-19 could negatively impact our future business operations and financial results.~~14

The Partnership has several ongoing measures in response to COVID-19 to support the health and well-being of its clients, partners and associates, and may implement additional measures in response to further economic or market events, but cannot provide any assurance that such measures will be successful. Potential effects of the pandemic and the resulting low interest rate environment on certain of the Partnership’s financial results have been disclosed in Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. However, actual results with respect to such items may vary from expectations and the variation could be material. Accordingly, you should not rely on these descriptions because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the control of the Partnership.

The Partnership is subject to a number of risks potentially impacting its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or in the Partnership’s other filings with the SEC, the following are some important factors that could cause the Partnership’s actual results to differ materially from results experienced in the past or those projected in any forward-looking statement. If any of the matters included in the following risks were to occur, the Partnership’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones the Partnership faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Partnership or that the Partnership currently deems immaterial could also have a material adverse impact on the Partnership’s business and operations. All amounts are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

COVID-19 GLOBAL PANDEMIC — Given the significant global health, market, employment and economic impacts of COVID-19 and the uncertainty of its duration, the Partnership may experience negative impacts to its business operations and financial results.

The spread of COVID-19 has adversely affected global business activities and has resulted in significant uncertainty in the global economy. Additionally, the federal funds rate remained near zero throughout 2021. Further economic or market events and an ongoing low interest rate environment could negatively impact the Partnership's business operations and financial results. In particular, the Partnership may experience lower asset-based revenue due to declines in the market value of client assets on which asset-based revenue is earned. Further, the Partnership may continue to experience fee waivers in order to maintain a positive client yield on the Money Market Fund, which reduces asset-based fee revenue, in addition to lower interest revenue when compared to pre-pandemic levels.

The effects of COVID-19 on financial advisor, BOA and home office associate attrition are uncertain and cannot be reliably predicted. However, there has been a significant increase in the number of companies offering remote work arrangements for all roles in response to the pandemic and changes in employees' work preferences, which enables those companies to attract employees from a broader geographic area and could potentially result in higher attrition.

MARKET CONDITIONS AND SECURITIES INDUSTRY— The Partnership's financial results are directly impacted by market conditions, inflation and trends and changes in the securities industry. A downturn in the U.S. and/or global securities markets has and could have a significant negative effect on revenues that could significantly reduce or eliminate profitability of the Partnership. Increasing inflation could also affect securities prices and as a result, the profitability of the Partnership. Furthermore, the securities industry is continually facing change, some of which may negatively impact the profitability of the Partnership.

General political and economic conditions and events such as U.S. fiscal and monetary policy, economic recession, governmental shutdown, trade tensions and disputes, global economic slowdown, widespread health epidemics or pandemics, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, war or other geopolitical conflict, changes in local and national economic, social and political conditions, regulatory changes or changes in the law, or interest rate or currency rate fluctuations could create a downturn in the U.S. and/or global securities markets. The securities industry, and therefore the Partnership, is highly dependent upon market prices and volumes which are highly unpredictable and volatile in nature. Events such as global recession, frozen credit markets, institutional failures and emergence of geopolitical conflicts could make the capital markets increasingly volatile. Weakened global economic conditions and unsettled financial markets, among other things, could cause significant declines in the Partnership’s net revenues which would adversely impact its overall financial results.

~~COVID-19 GLOBAL PANDEMIC —~~ Given the significant global health, market, employment and economic impacts of COVID-19 and the uncertainty of its duration, the Partnership may experience negative impacts to its business operations and financial results.

The spread of COVID-19 has adversely affected global business activities and has resulted in significant uncertainty in the global economy and volatility in financial markets. Additionally, the federal funds rate remains near zero. Further economic or market events and the low interest rate environment could negatively impact the Partnership's business operations and financial results. In particular, the Partnership may experience lower asset-based revenue due to declines in the market value of client assets on which asset-based revenue is earned and increased fee waivers in order to maintain a positive client yield on the Money Market Fund due to decreases in the federal funds rate. The Partnership may also experience lower interest revenue due to the ongoing low interest rate environment.

In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, the uncertainty of its duration and the potentially negative impacts on the Partnership's business operations and financial results, the Partnership has several ongoing measures to support the health and well-being of its clients, partners and associates. The ongoing measures include, among other things, closure and phased reopening of branches to public access, establishing the technological capability for branches to serve clients remotely, virtually all home office associates working remotely with limited exceptions, temporary financial support for certain financial advisors, additional paid time off and medical plan benefits for associates related to COVID-19, and a travel halt. The ongoing remote work may limit financial advisors' ability to obtain new clients and maintain existing client relationships through face-to-face client interactions.

Potentially lower asset-based fees and trade revenue resulting from the market uncertainty in response to COVID-19 could reduce commissions, bonuses, travel benefits and branch profitability for financial advisors. ~~The effects of COVID-19 on financial advisor attrition are uncertain and cannot be reliably predicted; however, these~~ ~~potentially negative impacts to financial advisor compensation and benefits may result in increased financial advisor attrition.~~ The Partnership may experience increased costs from providing temporary financial assistance to certain financial advisors in attempts to help support some financial advisors that may be experiencing financial hardship while also potentially mitigating heightened attrition rates.

~~MARKET CONDITIONS AND INFLATION —~~ As a part of the securities industry, a downturn in the U.S. and/or global securities markets historically has, and in the future could have, a significant negative effect on revenues and could significantly reduce or eliminate profitability of the Partnership. In addition, an increase in inflation could affect securities prices and as a result, the profitability of the Partnership.

General political and economic conditions and events such as U.S. fiscal and monetary policy, economic recession, governmental shutdown, trade tensions and disputes, global economic slowdown, widespread health epidemics or pandemics, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, war, changes in local and national economic, social and political conditions, regulatory changes or changes in the law, or interest rate or currency rate fluctuations could create a downturn in the U.S. and/or global securities markets. The securities industry, and therefore the Partnership, is highly dependent upon market prices and volumes which are highly unpredictable and volatile in nature. Events such as global recession, frozen credit markets, and institutional failures could make the capital markets increasingly volatile. Weakened global economic conditions and unsettled financial markets, among other things, could cause significant declines in the Partnership’s net revenues which would adversely impact its overall financial results.

The Partnership’s composition of net revenue is heavily weighted towards asset-based fee revenue, and a decrease in the market value of assets would have a negative impact on the Partnership’s financial results due to the fact that asset-based fees are earned on the market value of the underlying client assets. A market decline could have a greater negative impact on revenues and profitability than experienced in prior years due to the increasing proportion of asset-based revenues. Market volatility could also cause clients to move their investments to lower margin products, or withdraw them, which could have an adverse impact on the profitability of the Partnership. The Partnership could also experience a material reduction in volume and lower securities prices in times of market volatility, which would result in lower trade and

asset-based fee revenue, decreased margins and losses in firm inventory and investment accounts. ~~Current and potential market changes to fee structures in the mutual funds industry have resulted in and may continue to result in decreased margins and therefore lower revenues.~~ In the event of a significant reduction in revenues and depending on the amount of fixed financial advisor compensation at that time, the Partnership could experience a material adverse impact on the profitability of the Partnership.

~~Inflation~~High inflation rates and ~~future~~market expectations of rising inflation rates in the future can negatively influence securities prices, as well as activity levels in the securities markets. As a result, the Partnership’s profitability may be adversely affected by inflation and inflationary expectations. Additionally, the impact of inflation on the Partnership’s operating expenses may affect profitability to the extent that additional costs are not recoverable through increased prices of services offered by the Partnership.

A significant portion of the Partnership’s clients’ holdings are in mutual fund investments, which have been and may continue to be impacted by changes in the mutual funds industry affecting fee structures. The Partnership has experienced and may continue to experience decreased margins earned on mutual funds, which negatively impacts trade revenue.

Refer to the preceding risk factor for specific market conditions and risks related to the current COVID-19 pandemic.

COMPETITION — The Partnership is subject to intense competition for clients and personnel, and there is an increasing pace of industry change. Some of its competitors have greater resources and are rapidly changing their business practices.

All aspects of the Partnership’s business are highly competitive. The Partnership competes for clients and personnel directly with other securities firms and increasingly with other ~~types of~~ organizations and ~~other~~ businesses offering financial services, such as banks and insurance companies. Some of these organizations are larger and have greater capital, and additional resources, and some entities offer a wider range of financial services. Over the past several years, there has been significant consolidation of firms in the financial services industry, forcing the Partnership to compete with larger firms with greater capital and resources, brokerage volume, and range of financial services, and ~~more competitive pricing.~~some are "fintech" companies that have technological advancements that allow them to compete through internet- and mobile-based platforms. The Partnership continues to compete with firms of all sizes offering discount brokerage services, usually with lower levels of personalized service to individual clients, including major competitors that offer zero commissions for the purchases and sales of stocks, ETFs and other brokerage products. The Partnership currently charges clients a commission for the purchase and sale of similar products and continues to see declines in client dollars invested in trading products. Existing and future clients may seek lower cost options, which may significantly reduce the Partnership's trade revenue for the purchase and sale of brokerage products in the future.

Further, the financial services industry continues to evolve technologically, with an increasing number of firms of all sizes providing lower cost, computer-based "robo-advice" and enhanced digital experiences for clients with limited or no personalized service to clients or to supplement full-service offerings. Industry and technology changes may result in increased prevalence of robo-advisors. The Partnership is subject to risk from the accelerated changes to the industry and competitive forces, which have resulted and are expected to continue to result in significant costs for investments in human capital, technology infrastructure, digital initiatives, virtual enablement tools, strategic ~~initiatives in anticipation of such changes.~~relations and test and learn pilot programs, to deliver enhanced value for its clients, branch teams and home office associates. Clients ~~are able to~~can transfer their business to competing organizations at any time. The Partnership's continued ability to compete based on a business model designed to serve clients through personalized relationships with financial advisors and branch teams in order to provide goals-based advice may be impacted by the evolving financial services industry, including changing client expectations and technology needs, as well as robo-advisors and other lower cost options. The Partnership may be subject to operational risk if the Partnership is unable to keep pace with this rapidly changing environment, which includes client, industry, technology and regulatory changes. In addition, the Partnership's ability to compete and adapt its business model may be impacted by changing client demographics, preferences and values. If ~~financial advisors do~~the Partnership does not meet client needs, the Partnership could lose clients, thereby reducing revenues and profitability. Further, the Partnership faces increased competition for clients from larger firms in its non-urban markets, and from a broad range of firms in the urban and suburban markets in which the Partnership competes.

Competition among financial services firms also exists for financial advisors, BOAs and ~~other personnel.~~home office associates. The Partnership’s continued ability to expand its business and to compete effectively depends on the Partnership’s ability to attract qualified employees and to retain and motivate current employees. The Partnership plans to continue to grow its impact by focusing on hiring both experienced financial advisors and non-licensed candidates, as well as BOAs and home office associates, in future periods ~~and increasing~~to increase the number of clients and communities it serves. ~~Currently, after lifting a temporary hiring pause in response to COVID-19,~~If the Partnership is ~~gradually restarting~~unable to grow its impact with its focused hiring ~~to enable it to prioritize support for all financial advisors. This may result in fewer financial advisors hired than historically experienced, which could impact~~strategy, the Partnership's number of client accounts and net new assets ~~and~~ could have an adverse impact on its results of operations. Additionally, the Partnership's business is dependent on financial advisors' ability to compete for clients in order to attract and retain clients and clients' assets. If the

Partnership’s profitability decreases, then bonuses paid to financial advisors, BOAs and ~~other personnel,~~home office associates, along with profit-sharing contributions, may be decreased or eliminated, increasing the risk that personnel could be hired away by competitors. ~~Additionally,~~Furthermore, during an extended downturn in the economy, there is increased risk the Partnership’s more successful financial advisors may leave because a significant portion of their compensation is variable based on the Partnership’s profitability.

The current U.S. federal tax laws generally create favorable tax treatment for owners of pass-through entities with taxable income. However, many of the Partnership's financial advisors are employees and do not qualify for the favorable tax treatment. Further, the tax laws limit the deductibility of certain business expenses. As a result, the Partnership's ability to recruit and retain financial advisors against certain competitor models could be impacted.

The competitive pressure the Partnership experiences could have an adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. For additional information, see Part I, Item 1 – Business – Business Operations – Competition.

INTEREST RATE ENVIRONMENT — The Partnership’s profitability ~~could be negatively~~is impacted by ~~a continued low or a negative~~the interest rate environment.

The Partnership has been and continues to be exposed to risk from ~~changes in~~the low interest ~~rates, as~~rate environment. If the ~~federal funds~~low interest rate ~~remains near zero. The significant decline in interest rates in 2020 has~~environment continues, the Partnership will continue to be negatively impacted ~~and could continue to negatively impact the~~by lower interest income earned from interest-earning assets, primarily receivables from clients on margin balances and short-term investments. Banks have experienced a significant increase in cash deposits in recent periods, which may impact the Partnership's ability to continue to find financial institutions at which to place funds for principal protection while earning a reasonable rate of return on those funds. Additionally, the low interest rate environment has and ~~could~~will continue to have an impact on the expense related to the liabilities that finance these assets, such as amounts payable to clients.

The Partnership's revenue earned from certain cash solutions products has been negatively impacted and ~~could~~will continue to be negatively impacted by the low interest rate environment, which may reduce asset-based fee revenue. ~~Further, in~~The low interest rate ~~environments~~environment has and may continue to have a negative impact on the Partnership's ability to negotiate contracts with new banks or renegotiate existing contracts on comparable terms with banks participating in client cash programs. Additionally, throughout 2021, the Partnership ~~waives certain~~waived fees ~~to maintain a positive client yield, and~~earned from the ~~amount of waivers has significantly increased~~Money Market Fund due to the ongoing low interest rate environment, which, ~~could~~subject to a rise in interest rates, will continue to negatively impact asset-based fee revenue.

~~Although the Partnership does not currently expect a sustained negative~~A rising interest rate environment ~~if that were~~subjects the U.S. Treasury market to ~~occur,~~decreasing prices, directly impacting the Partnership's ~~profitability could be negatively impacted by reductions~~valuation of its portfolio of government and agency obligations, which may result in ~~asset-based fee revenue~~unrealized losses on its investments. Additionally, the respective interest rates earned ~~from~~and paid on the Partnership’s financial assets and liabilities may not change at the same pace, which may reduce the Partnership's ~~cash solutions products, additional costs with third parties to hold both firm and client cash deposits, and potential additional expenditures related to cash solutions products.~~profitability.

LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY INITIATIVES — Proposed, potential and recently enacted federal and state legislation, rules and regulations ("Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives") could significantly impact the regulation and operation of the Partnership and its subsidiaries. In addition, Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives may significantly alter or restrict the Partnership’s historic business practices, which could negatively affect its operating results.

The Partnership is subject to extensive regulation by federal and state regulatory agencies and by SROs and other regulators. The Partnership operates in a regulatory environment that is subject to ongoing change and has seen significantly increased regulation in recent years. The Partnership may be adversely affected as a result of new or revised legislation or regulations, by changes in federal, state or foreign tax laws and regulations, or by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and regulations. Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives may impact the manner in which the Partnership markets its products and services, manages its business and operations, and interacts with clients and regulators, any or all of which could materially impact the Partnership’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity. Regulatory changes or changes in the law could increase compliance costs which would adversely impact profitability.

There is a high degree of uncertainty surrounding Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives. Current Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives have resulted in an increasingly complex environment in which the Partnership conducts its

business. As such, the Partnership cannot reliably predict when or if any of the proposed or potential Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will be enacted, when or if any enacted Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will be implemented, whether there will be any changes to enacted or proposed Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives or the impact that any Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives will have on the Partnership.

The Partnership continues to monitor several Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives, including, but not limited to:

~~Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA") Amendments~~Standard of Care Initiatives. On October 3, 2019, the CSA finalized amendments (the "Client Focused Reforms") to National Instrument 31-103, "Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations." The Client Focused Reforms, many of which are similarIn addition to the SEC's Rules and Guidance and CSA's Client Focused Reforms (see Part I,1, Item 1 – Business – Regulation), make changes to the registrant conduct requirements applicable to the Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary. The amendments will become effective over a two-year phased implementation, concluding December 31, 2021. The Partnership is continuing to dedicate significant resources to interpret and address the Client Focused Reforms, to identify any potential changes to be made by the phased compliance dates and to assess the potential impact on the Partnership's business.

~~Other Standard of Care Initiatives. In addition,~~ state legislators and other regulators are proposing, or have adopted, laws and rules to articulate their required standard of care, which may diverge from the SEC's Rules and Guidance. The Partnership is dedicating significant resources to interpret and address these laws and ~~rules as well.~~rules. The Partnership cannot reliably predict the ultimate form or impact of such rules and laws, but their enactment and implementation may have an adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.

DOL Prohibited Transaction Exemption ("PTE"). On February 16, 2021, the DOL's PTE on Improving Investment Advice for Workers and Retirees ~~became effective.~~was finalized. The PTE provides a means for financial advisors and their firms to receive certain payments even if they are deemed a fiduciary under applicable guidance for purposes of ERISA and retirement accounts. The Partnership ~~is currently examining what~~has implemented measures ~~would need~~ to ~~be taken to utilize~~comply with the ~~PTE and what its potential impact would be on the Partnership's business.~~PTE.

LITIGATION AND REGULATORY INVESTIGATIONS AND PROCEEDINGS — As a financial services firm, the Partnership is subject to litigation involving civil plaintiffs seeking substantial damages and regulatory investigations and proceedings, which have increased over time and are expected to continue to increase.

Many aspects of the Partnership’s business involve substantial litigation and regulatory risks. The Partnership is, from time to time, subject to examinations, informal inquiries and investigations by regulatory and other governmental agencies, as well as SROs and other regulators. Such matters have in the past, and could in the future, lead to formal actions, which may negatively impact the Partnership’s ~~business.~~business and result in significant expenses. In the ordinary course of business, the Partnership also is subject to arbitration claims, lawsuits and other significant litigation such as class action suits. Over time, there has been increasing litigation involving the financial services industry, including class action suits that generally seek substantial damages.

The Partnership has incurred and may continue to incur significant expenses to defend ~~and/~~and settle claims. Negative outcomes in litigation or ~~settle claims~~regulatory investigations may negatively impact the Partnership's financial results due to penalties and fines, restitution to clients and personnel and injunctive or other equitable relief, which may be significant. Additionally, negative outcomes may result in reputational harm that could impact the ~~past.~~Partnership's ability to attract and retain clients and personnel. In view of the inherent difficulty of reliably predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases in which claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or in actions which are at very preliminary stages, the Partnership cannot predict with certainty the eventual loss or range of loss related to such matters. Due to the uncertainty related to litigation and regulatory investigations and proceedings, the Partnership cannot determine if such matters will have a material adverse effect on its revenues, profitability, and its consolidated financial condition.

Such legal actions may be material to future operating results for a particular period or periods. See Part I, Item 3 – Legal Proceedings for more information regarding certain unresolved claims.

INABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN ~~FINANCIAL ADVISORS OR GROW THE NUMBER OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS~~QUALIFIED TALENT — If the Partnership ~~experiences attrition rates of its financial advisors that are higher than its expectations or~~ is unable to ~~grow the number of financial advisors or~~attract, retain, develop and support ~~its~~qualified financial advisors, BOAs and home office associates, the Partnership may not be able to maintain or increase its operating results or grow the firm's positive impact on clients and communities.

The ~~increase~~Partnership is committed to an innovative and intentional strategy to grow its impact by offering a plan and resources for both current financial advisors and new hires. This growth strategy is intended to help promote branch team success in serving existing clients and future clients and creating a positive impact in our communities. This approach may continue to result in fewer financial advisors hired than in past periods. During times of market volatility and industry change, it has and may continue to be, more difficult for the ~~number of~~Partnership to attract qualified applicants for financial advisor positions. The Partnership relies heavily on referrals from its current financial advisors in recruiting new financial advisors, and current financial advisors may be less effective in ~~recent periods has positively impacted the Partnership's net~~recruiting potential new financial ~~advisor growth. However, being~~advisors through referrals during times of market volatility and industry change. Additionally, new ~~to the business, many of these~~ financial advisors have ~~encountered or~~and may continue to encounter difficulties developing or expanding their ~~businesses. The Partnership has periodically experienced higher rates of attrition, particularly with respect to financial advisors who are new to the business and have not experienced~~businesses, specifically in times of market volatility. ~~The~~There can be no assurance that the Partnership will be able to grow, retain, develop and support its financial advisors and it may ~~also~~ experience increased financial advisor attrition due to increased competition from other financial services companies and efforts by those firms to recruit its financial advisors. ~~However,~~Furthermore, given changes to regulatory requirements, performance standards and financial advisor compensation, there can be no assurance that the attrition rates the Partnership has experienced in the past will not increase in the future.

~~Historically, during times~~The market for qualified personnel is highly competitive as financial industry employers are increasingly offering incentives such as guaranteed contracts, upfront payments and increased compensation, which may adversely impact the Partnership's attraction and retention of ~~market volatility~~qualified talent and ~~industry change, it is more difficult~~could lead to increased compensation costs for the Partnership to attract qualified applicants for financial advisor positions. In addition, the Partnership relies heavily on referrals from its current financial advisors in recruiting new financial advisors. During times of market volatility and industry change, current financial advisors may be less effective in recruiting potential new financial advisors through referrals. There can be no assurance that the Partnership will be able to grow or maintain its current number of financial advisors.

Partnership. The Partnership's growth and retention of client accounts, as well as the gathering of new assets, are affected by retention and growth in the number of financial advisors, as well as BOAs and home office associates who support those financial advisors. ~~While the Partnership plans~~The inability to ~~continue to grow the number of~~attract, retain, develop or support financial advisors, ~~in future periods, it intends to focus on the support~~BOAs and ~~resources that our existing and new financial advisors need to be successful and to grow their practices to serve current and future clients with impact, which~~home office associates may result in slower growth ~~rates than historically experienced. Slower growth rates~~ in the number of ~~financial advisors,~~ client accounts and net new assets, which could have an adverse impact on revenue the Partnership receives from commissions and asset-based fees and on its results of operations.

INCREASED FINANCIAL ADVISOR COMPENSATION — Compensation paid to new financial advisors, as well as current financial advisors participating in a retirement transition plan, could negatively impact the Partnership’s profitability and capital if the increased compensation does not result in greater retention of financial advisors and clients or increased productivity.

In order to attract candidates to become financial advisors, the Partnership provides new financial advisors, for specified periods of time, a minimum base compensation as well as certain bonuses based on the amount of new assets gathered. The intent is to attract a greater number of ~~high quality~~high-quality recruits with an enhanced level of base compensation in order to serve more clients and meet the Partnership’s growth objectives. If financial advisor compensation does not result in a corresponding increase in the level of productivity and retention rate of these financial advisors, then this additional compensation could negatively impact the Partnership’s financial performance in future periods. Additionally, the Partnership's compensation programs have resulted in higher costs to support the firm's growth and business model that will increase the cumulative investment in each branch.

In order to better transition clients to a new financial advisor when their current financial advisor retires, as well as to retain quality financial advisors until retirement, the Partnership offers individually tailored retirement transition plans to financial advisors. These retirement transition plans may offer increased financial consideration prior to and after retirement for financial advisors who provide client transition services in accordance with a retirement and transition employment agreement. If this increased financial consideration does not increase client asset retention or help to retain quality financial advisors until retirement, the additional financial consideration could negatively impact the Partnership’s profitability and capital in future periods. In addition, the Partnership expects that the retirement transition plans will result in higher financial advisor compensation expense in the future.

BRANCH OFFICE SYSTEM — The Partnership’s system of maintaining branch offices ~~primarily staffed by one financial advisor~~ may expose the Partnership to risk of loss or liability from the activities of the ~~financial advisors~~branch team and to increases in rent related to increased real property values.

The majority of the Partnership’s branch offices are staffed by a single financial advisor and a ~~branch office administrator.~~BOA. Branch offices do not have an onsite supervisor as would be found at broker-dealers with multi-broker branches. The Partnership’s primary supervisory activity is conducted from its home offices. Although this method of supervision is designed to comply with all applicable industry and regulatory requirements, it is possible that the Partnership is exposed to a risk of loss arising from alleged imprudent or illegal actions of its financial ~~advisors.~~advisors and/or BOAs. Furthermore, the Partnership may be exposed to further losses if additional time passes before its supervisory personnel detect problem activity.

The Partnership maintains personal financial and account information and other documents and instruments for its clients at its branch offices, both physically and in electronic format. Despite reasonable precautions, because the branch offices are relatively small and some are in remote locations, the security systems at these branch offices may not prevent theft of such information. If security of a branch is breached and personal financial and account information is stolen, the Partnership’s clients may suffer financial harm and the Partnership could incur financial harm, suffer reputational damage and face regulatory issues.

In addition, the Partnership leases its branch office spaces and a material increase in the value of real property across a broad geography may increase the amount of rent paid, which will negatively impact the Partnership’s profitability. Further, the Partnership is currently focused on placing financial advisors in urban markets, which tend to have higher rent costs and could negatively impact the Partnership's profitability.

LIQUIDITY — The Partnership’s business in the securities industry requires that sufficient liquidity be available to maintain its business activities, and it may not always have access to sufficient funds.

Liquidity, or ready access to funds, is essential to the Partnership’s business. A tight credit market could have a negative impact on the Partnership’s ability to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet its working capital needs. Short-term and long-term financing are two sources of liquidity that could be affected by a tight credit market. In a tight credit market, lenders may reduce their lending to borrowers, including the Partnership. There is no assurance that financing will be available at attractive terms, or at all, in the future. Additionally, the Partnership's access to funds held at the broker-dealer is subject to regulatory capital requirements and may require approval from regulators. A significant decrease in the Partnership’s access to funds could negatively affect its business and financial management in addition to its reputation in the industry.

Limited partners who finance all or a portion of their limited partnership interests with bank loans may be more likely to request the withdrawal of capital to repay such obligations should the Partnership experience a period of reduced earnings. Any withdrawals by limited partners are subject to the terms of the Partnership Agreement and would reduce the Partnership’s available liquidity and capital.

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the ~~Executive Committee~~Enterprise Leadership Team ("ELT"), as defined in the Partnership Agreement), who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital ~~contributions).~~contributions. In limited circumstances, a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while he or she still has an outstanding Partnership loan. Loans made by the Partnership to such partners are generally for a period of one year but are expected to be renewed and bear interest at ~~an interest rate defined in~~ the ~~loan documents.~~greater of the Prime Rate for the last business day of the prior fiscal month or 3.25% per annum. The Partnership has full recourse against any partner that defaults on loan obligations to the Partnership. However, there is no assurance that partners will be able to repay the interest and/or the principal amount of their Partnership loans at or prior to ~~maturity. If partners are unable to repay~~maturity, which may adversely impact the ~~interest and/or the principal amount of their Partnership loans at or prior to maturity, the Partnership could be adversely impacted.~~Partnership.

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS; UNIFORM NET CAPITAL AND CUSTOMER PROTECTION RULES — The Uniform Net Capital Rule imposes minimum net capital requirements and could limit the Partnership’s ability to engage in certain activities which are crucial to its business. The Customer Protection Rule may limit the rate of return the Partnership could earn on cash and investments depending on trends in the banking industry.

Adequacy of capital is vitally important to broker-dealers, and lack of sufficient capital may limit the Partnership’s ability to compete effectively. In particular, lack of sufficient capital or compliance with the Uniform Net Capital Rule may limit Edward Jones’ ability to commit to certain securities activities such as trading and its ability to expand margin account balances, as well as its commitment to new activities requiring an investment of capital. FINRA regulations and the Uniform Net Capital Rule may restrict Edward Jones’ ability to expand its business operations, including opening new branch offices or hiring additional financial advisors. Consequently, a significant operating loss or an extraordinary charge against net capital could adversely affect Edward Jones’ ability to expand or even maintain its present levels of business.

Pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule, the Partnership has cash and investments segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients. Banking regulations and the interest rate environment may also impact the Partnership's ability to continue to find financial institutions at which to place those segregated client funds and earn a reasonable rate of return on those funds. Additionally, the Partnership has ~~significantly increased its~~significant investments in U.S. treasuries to help facilitate cash management for the firm and regulatory reserve requirements for its clients. In the event of a significant and sudden change to the customer reserve requirements, the Partnership may experience liquidity restraints and have to sell the investments at a loss, which may negatively impact the Partnership's profitability.

In the U.S., Edward Jones may be required to restrict its withdrawal of Partnership capital in order to meet its net capital requirements. In addition to the regulatory requirements applicable to Edward Jones, ~~Edward Jones~~ Trust ~~Company~~Co. and ~~the Partnership's~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ are subject to regulatory capital requirements in the U.S. and in Canada, respectively. Failure by the Partnership to maintain the required regulatory capital for any of its subsidiaries may subject it to disciplinary actions by the SEC, FINRA, IIROC, OCC or other regulatory bodies, which could ultimately require its liquidation.

LACK OF CAPITAL PERMANENCY — Because the Partnership’s capital is subject to mandatory redemption either upon the death or withdrawal request of a partner, the capital is not permanent and a significant mandatory redemption could lead to a substantial reduction in the Partnership’s capital, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s business.

Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, a partner’s capital is required to be redeemed by the Partnership in the event of the partner's death, subject to compliance with ongoing regulatory capital requirements. In addition, partners may request withdrawals from their capital accounts, subject to certain limitations on the timing of those withdrawals and regulatory capital requirements. Accordingly, the Partnership’s capital is not permanent and is dependent upon current and future partners to both maintain their existing capital and make additional capital contributions in the Partnership. Any withdrawal requests by general partners, subordinated limited partners or limited partners would reduce the Partnership’s available liquidity and capital. The Managing Partner may decline a withdrawal request if that withdrawal would result in the Partnership violating any agreement, such as a loan agreement, or any applicable laws, rules or regulations.

Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, limited partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership are repaid their capital in three equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their withdrawal notice is received by the Managing Partner. The capital of general partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership is converted to subordinated limited partnership capital or, at the discretion of the Managing Partner, redeemed by the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners requesting withdrawal are repaid their capital in six equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their request for withdrawal of capital is received by the Managing Partner. The ~~Partnership’s~~ Managing Partner has discretion to waive or modify these withdrawal restrictions and to accelerate the return of capital. Redemptions upon the death of a partner are generally required to be made within six months of the date of death. Due to the nature of the redemption requirements of the Partnership's capital as set forth in the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership accounts for its capital as a liability, in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). If the Partnership’s capital declines by a substantial amount due to partner deaths or withdrawals, the Partnership may not have sufficient capital to operate or expand its business or to meet withdrawal requests by partners.

The risk of withdrawal requests could increase during periods of decreased profitability or potential losses, which may impact the Partnership's results of operations.

CREDIT RISK — The Partnership is subject to credit risk due to the nature of the transactions it processes for its clients.

The Partnership is exposed to the risk that third parties who owe it money, securities or other assets will not meet their obligations. Many of the transactions in which the Partnership engages expose it to credit risk in the event of default by its counterparty or client, such as cash balances held at various major U.S. financial institutions, which typically exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage limits. In addition, the Partnership’s credit risk may be increased when the collateral it holds cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices insufficient to recover the full amount of the obligation due to the Partnership.

See Part III, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance for more information about the Partnership’s credit risk.

INVESTMENT ADVISORY ACTIVITIES — The Partnership’s investment advisory businesses may be affected by the investment performance of its portfolios and operational risks associated with the size of the programs.

Poor investment returns, due to either general market conditions or underperformance of programs constructed by the Partnership (relative to the programs of the Partnership’s competitors or to benchmarks) may affect the Partnership's ability to retain existing ~~assets under care~~AUC and to attract new clients or additional assets from existing clients. Should there be a reduction in ~~assets under care~~AUC in programs which generate asset-based fees, the Partnership would experience a decrease in net revenue.

Based on the current size of the investment advisory programs, the programs may experience concentration risks associated with the level and percentage of holdings in individual funds within the programs which could result in additional operational and regulatory risks for the Partnership. As a result of the size of the programs, the Partnership is also exposed to the risk that trading volumes and program activity could impact the Partnership's ability to process transactions in a timely manner.

PROPRIETARY MUTUAL FUNDS — The Partnership’s business may be affected by operational risks, investment performance and the heightened regulatory requirements it faces as a result of sponsoring proprietary mutual funds and managing sub-advisers and other third-party service providers.

As a sponsor and investment adviser to proprietary mutual funds, the Partnership, through its ownership of Olive Street and Passport Research, may experience additional operational risk and regulatory requirements attributed to Olive Street's and Passport Research's responsibilities to oversee the investment management of mutual funds. Due to the size and number of sub-advisers within the proprietary mutual funds, there is a heightened risk associated with the Partnership's ability to perform ongoing due diligence and supervision. Poor investment returns, due to either general market conditions or underperformance, of proprietary mutual funds may affect the Partnership's ability to expand the BB Trust, develop new mutual funds, attract new client assets, and retain existing client assets.

UPGRADE OF TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS — The Partnership will continue to engage in significant ~~technology~~digital initiatives in the future which may be costly and could lead to disruptions.

The Partnership has engaged in significant ~~technology~~digital initiatives and expects to continue to do so in the future, which may result in a significant increase in costs that may adversely impact the Partnership's profitability. Such initiatives are not only necessary to better meet the needs of and add value for the Partnership’s clients, but also to satisfy new industry standards and practices, anticipate industry and competitive changes, better secure the transmission of clients’ information on the Partnership’s systems, enhance support for a ~~continued~~hybrid remote and in-office workforce ~~in response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic~~ and improve operational efficiency. The Partnership's inability to enhance technology at the pace of the industry could negatively impact its ability to attract and retain clients.

With any major digital initiative or system replacement, there will be a period of education and adjustment for the branch and home office associates utilizing the tool or system. Following any upgrade or replacement, if the Partnership’s systems, tools or equipment do not operate properly, are disabled or fail to perform due to

increased demand (which might occur during market upswings or downturns), or if a new tool, system or system upgrade contains a major problem, the Partnership could experience inefficiencies and unanticipated disruptions in service, including interrupted trading, slower response times, decreased client service and client satisfaction, poor user experience and delays in the introduction of new products and services, any of which could result in financial losses, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or reputational damage. ~~Further, the~~

TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONAL DISRUPTIONS — The inability ~~of the Partnership’s systems~~ to ~~accommodate a significant increase in~~successfully process client transactions due to volume ~~of transactions also could constrain its ability to expand its business.~~

~~TRANSACTION VOLUME, CAPACITY, AND VOLATILITY —~~ ~~Significant increases~~ and ~~decreases in the number of transactions by the Partnership’s clients~~volatility can have a material negative effect on the Partnership’s profitability, operations, reputation and ~~its ability~~regulatory compliance.

The Partnership processes, records and monitors a significant amount of client transactions daily. Transaction volume and volatility may result in unanticipated system interruptions, errors or downtime due to ~~efficiently process~~system capacity that could have a significant impact on the Partnership's profitability, operations and ~~settle these transactions.~~

reputation. Significant volatility in the number of client transactions and rebalancing activity may ~~result in~~cause operational problems such as a higher incidence of failures to deliver and receive securities and errors in processing transactions, and such volatility may also result in increased personnel and related processing ~~costs. The~~costs that could have a negative impact on the Partnership's profitability. In the event the Partnership's systems are unable to handle transaction volatility and volumes, the Partnership may experience ~~adverse effects on~~extended periods of downtime to restore system functionality that could affect its ~~profitability~~ability to process and settle client transactions timely and accurately, potentially resulting ~~from~~in financial losses, disciplinary action by governmental agencies, SROs and/or other regulators and damage to the Partnership's reputation. Additionally, the inability of the Partnership’s systems to accommodate a significant ~~reductions~~increase in ~~securities sales~~the volume of transactions could also constrain its ability to expand its business. Furthermore, technology and ~~may encounter~~ operational ~~problems arising from unanticipated high transaction volume because the Partnership is not able to control such fluctuations.~~

~~In addition, significant transaction volume~~disruptions could result in inaccurate books and records, which would expose the Partnership to disciplinary action by governmental agencies, SROs and other regulators.

RELIANCE ON THIRD PARTIES — The Partnership’s dependence on third-party organizations exposes the Partnership to disruption or loss if their products and services are no longer offered or supported or develop defects.

The Partnership incurs obligations to its clients which are supported by obligations from firms within the industry, especially those firms with which the Partnership maintains relationships by which securities transactions are executed. The inability of an organization with which the Partnership does a large volume of business to promptly meet its obligations could result in substantial losses to the Partnership, and delays in or disruptions to the execution of clients' securities transactions.

The Partnership is particularly dependent on Broadridge, which acts as the Partnership’s primary vendor for providing accounting and record-keeping for client accounts in both the U.S. and Canada. The Partnership’s communications and information systems are integrated with the information systems of Broadridge. There are relatively few alternative providers to Broadridge and although the Partnership has analyzed the feasibility of performing Broadridge’s functions internally, the Partnership may not be able to do it in a cost-effective manner or otherwise. The Partnership also utilizes certain products and services of BNY Mellon for mutual fund investments held by the Partnership’s clients and for certain trading activities. BNY Mellon’s products and services enable the Partnership to provide certain services to mutual funds, primarily shareholder accounting. Consequently, any new computer systems or software packages implemented by these third parties which are not compatible with the Partnership’s systems, or any other interruption or the cessation of service by these third parties as a result of systems limitations or failures, could cause unanticipated disruptions in the Partnership’s business which may result in financial losses and/or disciplinary action by governmental agencies, SROs and/or other regulators.

A significant portion of the Partnership's revenue comes from commissions and service fees that the Partnership earns from third-party mutual fund and insurance companies for providing certain distribution and marketing support services for those companies' products held by Edward Jones clients. For mutual funds, those commissions and service fees are based on the terms of mutual fund prospectuses. Substantial changes to the structure of the commissions and fees paid to the Partnership could have an adverse impact on asset-based and trading revenues.

SECURITY BREACHES — Security breaches of the Partnership’s systems, or those of third parties, could lead to significant financial loss to the Partnership’s business and operations, significant liability, and harm to the Partnership’s reputation and client relationships.

The Partnership relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business, including the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information. The Partnership’s ~~home office facilities~~offices and its existing communications and information systems, including its backup systems, as well as the systems of third parties the Partnership relies on, are vulnerable to security breaches, damages and interruptions from human error, sabotage, cybersecurity attacks, computer viruses and other malicious code, intentional acts of vandalism, attempts by others to gain unauthorized access to the Partnership’s systems, and similar events. The risk of these types of security breaches occurring is continuing. The Partnership has processes in place designed to safeguard and monitor against security breaches and other disruptions of its systems and those of third parties the Partnership relies on and has not experienced, to date, any material losses related to cybersecurity attacks or other information security breaches. However, there can be no assurance the Partnership will not suffer such losses in the future.

If a security breach were to occur, such an event could substantially disrupt the Partnership’s business by ~~jeopardizing~~exposing the Partnership’s, its clients’ or third parties’ confidential information or causing interruptions or malfunctions in the Partnership’s or third parties’ operations. In order to serve clients, the Partnership maintains personal information about current, former and prospective clients, partners and associates that is subject to various laws and regulations. Security breaches of this type of information could subject the Partnership to significant liability and expenses that may not be covered by insurance. In addition, the Partnership’s reputation and business may suffer if such clients or associates experience data or financial loss from a significant security breach.

CANADA OPERATIONS — The Partnership has made, and may be required to continue to make, substantial investments to support its Canada operations, which have not ~~yet achieved profitability.~~consistently been profitable.

The Partnership commenced operations in Canada in 1994 and plans to continue to expand its branch system in Canada. Canada operations have historically operated at a substantial deficit ~~from~~since inception. ~~The Partnership intends to continue to operate~~However, Canada became profitable in ~~Canada, which may require substantial additional investments in its Canada operations to address short-term liquidity, capital, or expansion needs.~~2021. The Partnership has initiatives in place designed to accomplish the objectives of increasing revenue, controlling expenses and intentionally growing the number of financial advisors in order to ~~achieve~~maintain profitability in ~~Canada. Even though client assets under care in~~ Canada ~~have grown,~~without future capital support from the Partnership. However, there is no guarantee that Canada will maintain profitability, and the Partnership ~~has not historically been able~~may have to ~~grow the number of financial advisors and client assets under care~~provide additional support to ~~a level that would result in achieving its objectives. There is no assurance Canada operations will ultimately become profitable.~~address short-term liquidity, capital or expansion needs. For further information on Canada operations, see Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1615 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

INTENT TO PURSUE A BANK — The Partnership's application to obtain an industrial bank charter may not be successful; and if the charter is granted, the Partnership would be subject to additional risks related to capital and other costs to establish and maintain the bank, additional regulatory oversight, potential legislative changes and uncertainty of obtaining the anticipated benefits.

On July 1, 2020, the Partnership announced it had submitted an application to the FDIC and Utah Department of Financial Institutions to establish a Utah-chartered industrial bank subsidiary to be named Edward Jones Bank. The Partnership cannot reliably predict the timing of the application process, whether its application will be successful and, if so, on what terms and whether and to what extent an industrial bank would yield the anticipated benefits. If the charter is granted, the Partnership expects to incur substantial start-up costs and commit a significant amount of capital to support the development and initial operations of Edward Jones Bank. Factors that could affect the profitability and success of Edward Jones Bank if the charter is granted include, but are not limited to, unanticipated additional costs, the need for additional capital support, operational challenges, uncertain client demand, legislative changes and regulatory changes and oversight, any or all of which may adversely impact Edward Jones Bank's and the Partnership's results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

HOLDING COMPANY — JFC is a holding company; as a consequence, JFC’s ability to satisfy its obligations under the Partnership Agreement will depend in large part on the ability of its subsidiaries to pay distributions or dividends to JFC, which is restricted by law and contractual obligations.

Since JFC is a holding company, the principal sources of cash available to it are distributions or dividends from its subsidiaries and other payments under intercompany arrangements with its subsidiaries. Accordingly, JFC’s ability to generate the funds necessary to satisfy its obligations with respect to the Interests, including the 7½% payment to limited partners pursuant to the Partnership Agreement (the "7½% Payment"), will be dependent on distributions, dividends, and intercompany payments from its subsidiaries, and if those sources are insufficient, JFC may be unable to satisfy such obligations.

JFC’s principal operating subsidiaries, including Edward Jones, are subject to various statutory and regulatory restrictions applicable to broker-dealers generally that limit the amount of cash distributions, dividends, loans and advances that those subsidiaries may pay to JFC. Regulations relating to capital requirements affecting some of JFC’s subsidiaries also restrict their ability to pay distributions or dividends and make loans to JFC. See Part I, Item 1 – Business – Regulation for a discussion of these requirements.

In addition, JFC’s subsidiaries may be restricted under the terms of their financing arrangements from paying distributions or dividends to JFC, or may be required to maintain specified levels of capital. Moreover, JFC or its subsidiaries may enter into financing arrangements in the future which may include additional restrictions or debt covenant requirements further restricting distributions to JFC, which may impact JFC’s ability to make distributions to its limited partners.

SUFFICIENCY OF DISTRIBUTIONS TO REPAY FINANCING — Limited partners may finance their purchase of the Interests with a bank loan. The Partnership does not guarantee those loans, and distributions may be insufficient to pay the interest or principal due on the loans.

Many limited partners finance the purchases of their Interests by obtaining personal bank loans. Any such bank loan agreement is between the limited partner and the bank. The Partnership performs certain administrative functions for the majority of limited partner bank loans, but does not guarantee the bank loans, nor can limited partners pledge their Interests as collateral for the bank loan. Limited partners who have chosen to finance a portion of the purchase price of their Interests assume all risks associated with the loan, including the legal obligation to repay the loan.

There is no assurance that distributions from the Partnership will be sufficient to pay the interest on a limited partner’s loan or repay the principal amount of the loan at or prior to its maturity. Furthermore, in the event the Partnership experiences a loss which leads to its liquidation, there is no assurance there will be sufficient capital available to distribute to the limited partners for the repayment of any loans.

NON-VOTING INTERESTS; NON-TRANSFERABILITY OF INTERESTS; ABSENCE OF MARKET, PRICE FOR INTERESTS — The Interests are non-voting and non-transferable, no market for the Interests exists or is expected to develop, and the price only represents book value.

None of the limited partners in their capacity as limited partners may vote or otherwise participate in the management of the Partnership’s business. The Managing Partner has the authority to amend the Partnership Agreement without the consent of the limited partners, subordinated limited partners or general partners. None of the limited partners may sell, pledge, exchange, transfer or assign their Interests without the express written consent of the Managing Partner (which is not expected to be given).

Because there is no market for the Interests, there is no fair market value for the Interests. The price ($1,000 per Interest) at which the Interests were offered represents the book value of each Interest. The Partnership's capital could decline to a point where the book value of the Interests could be less than the price paid.

RISK OF DILUTION — The Interests may be diluted from time to time, which could lead to decreased returns to the limited partners.

The Managing Partner has the ability, in ~~his or her~~their sole discretion, to issue additional Interests or Partnership capital. The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January 12, 2018, to register $450 ~~million~~ of Interests issuable pursuant to the Partnership's 2018 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2018 Plan"). The Partnership issued approximately $380, ~~million,~~ $1, ~~million~~$5 and ~~$3 million~~$4 of Interests under the 2018 Plan in ~~early~~ 2019, 2020, 2021 and ~~2021,~~early 2022, respectively. The Partnership plans to terminate the 2018 Plan in 2022 and deregister all remaining ~~$66 million of~~unsold Interests ~~may be issued~~ under the 2018 Plan. Before the 2018 Plan is terminated, the Partnership may issue the remaining $60 of Interests under that plan at the discretion of the Managing ~~Partner in~~Partner. The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the ~~future.~~SEC on December 8, 2021, to register an additional $700 of Interests issuable pursuant to the Partnership's 2021 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2021 Plan"). Proceeds from the offering under the ~~2018~~2021 Plan are expected to be used to meet growth needs or for ~~working capital and general firm purposes and to ensure there is adequate general liquidity of the Partnership for future needs.~~other purposes.

The issuance of Interests will reduce the percentage of participation in net income by general partners and subordinated limited partners. Further, the issuance of additional Interests will decrease the Partnership’s net interest income by the 7½% Payment for the additional Interests, and holders of existing Interests may suffer decreased returns on their investment because the amount of the Partnership’s net income they participate in may be reduced as a consequence. Accordingly, the issuance of additional Interests will reduce the Partnership’s net interest income and profitability.

In ~~2020,~~2021, the Partnership retained 13.8% of the general partners’ net income as capital which is credited monthly to the general partners’ Adjusted Capital Contributions (as defined in the Partnership Agreement). Retention for ~~2021~~2022 is expected to remain at a similar level as ~~2020.~~2021. Such retention, along with any additional capital contributions by general partners, will reduce the percentage of participation in net income by limited partners. There is no requirement to retain a minimum amount of general partners’ net income, and the percentage of retained net income could change at any time in the future. In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, the percentage of income allocated to limited partners is reset annually and the amount of retained general partner income reduces the income allocated to limited partners.

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY; INDEMNIFICATION — The Partnership Agreement limits the liability of the Managing Partner and general partners by indemnifying them under certain circumstances, which may limit a limited partner’s rights against them and could reduce the accumulated profits distributable to limited partners.

The Partnership Agreement provides that none of the general partners, including the Managing Partner, will be liable to any person for any acts or omissions performed or omitted by such partner on behalf of the Partnership (even if such action, omission or failure to act constituted negligence) as long as such partner has (a) not committed fraud, (b) acted in subjective good faith or in a manner which did not involve intentional misconduct, a knowing violation of law or which was grossly negligent, and (c) not derived improper personal benefit.

The Partnership also must indemnify any general partner, including the Managing Partner, from any claim in connection to acts or omissions performed in connection with the business of the Partnership and from costs or damages stemming from a claim attributable to acts or omissions by such partner, unless such act or omission was not in good faith on behalf of the Partnership, was not in a manner reasonably believed by the partner to be within the scope of ~~his or her~~their authority, and was not in the best interests of the Partnership. The Partnership does not have to indemnify any general partner, including the Managing Partner, in instances of fraud, for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct, a knowing violation of the law, or gross negligence, or for any acts or omissions where such partner derived improper personal benefit.

As a result of these provisions, the limited partners have more limited rights against such partners than they would have absent the limitations in the Partnership Agreement. Indemnification of the general partners could deplete the Partnership’s assets unless the Partnership's indemnification obligation is covered by insurance, which the Partnership may or may not obtain, or which insurance may not be available at a reasonable price or at all or in an amount sufficient to cover the indemnification obligation. The Partnership Agreement does not provide for indemnification of limited partners.

RISK OF LOSS — The Interests are equity interests in the Partnership. As a result, and in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, the right of return of a limited partner’s Capital Contribution (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) is subordinate to all existing and future claims of the Partnership’s general creditors, including any of its subordinated creditors.

In the event of a partial or total liquidation of the Partnership or in the event there were insufficient Partnership assets to satisfy the claims of its general creditors, the limited partners may not be entitled to receive their entire Capital Contribution amounts back. Limited partner capital accounts are not guaranteed. However, as a class, the limited partners would be entitled to receive the return of their aggregate Capital Contributions before the return of any capital contributions to the subordinated limited partners or the general partners. If the Partnership suffers losses in any year but liquidation procedures described above are not undertaken and the Partnership continues, the amounts of such losses would be absorbed in the capital accounts of the partners as described in the Partnership Agreement, and each limited partner in any event remains entitled to receive the 7½% Payments under the terms of the Partnership Agreement. However, as there would be no accumulated profits in such a year, limited partners would not receive any sums representing participation in net income of the Partnership. In addition, although the amount of the 7½% Payments to limited partners are charged as an expense to the Partnership and are payable whether or not the Partnership earns any accumulated profits during any given period, no reserve fund has been set aside to enable the Partnership to make such payments. Therefore, such payments to the limited partners are subject to the Partnership’s ability to service the 7½% Payment, of which there is no assurance.

FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK FOR CANADA RESIDENTS — Each foreign limited partner has the risk that ~~he or she~~they will lose value on ~~his or her~~their investment in the Interests due to fluctuations in the applicable exchange rate; furthermore, foreign limited partners may owe tax on a disposition of the Interests solely as the result of a movement in the applicable exchange rate.

All investors purchase Interests using U.S. dollars. As a result, limited partners who reside in Canada may risk having the value of their investment, expressed in Canadian currency, decrease over time due to movements in the applicable currency exchange rates. Accordingly, such limited ~~partner~~partners may have a loss upon disposition of ~~his or her~~their investment solely due to a downward fluctuation in the applicable exchange rate.

In addition, changes in exchange rates could have an impact on Canadian federal income tax consequences for a limited partner, if such limited partner is a resident in Canada for purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada). The disposition by such limited partner of an Interest, including as a result of the withdrawal of the limited partner from the Partnership or the Partnership’s dissolution, may result in the realization of a capital gain (or capital loss) by such limited partner. The amount of such capital gain (or capital loss) generally will be the amount, if any, by which the proceeds of disposition of such Interest, less any reasonable costs of disposition, each expressed in Canadian currency using the exchange rate on the date of disposition, exceed (or are exceeded by) the adjusted cost base of such Interest, expressed in Canadian currency using the exchange rate on the date of each transaction that is relevant in determining the adjusted cost base. Accordingly, because the exchange rate for those currencies may fluctuate between the date or dates on which the adjusted cost base of a limited partner’s Interest is determined and the date on which the Interest is disposed of, a Canadian-resident limited partner may realize a capital gain or capital loss on the disposition of ~~his or her~~their Interest solely as a result of fluctuations in exchange rates.

STATUS AS PARTNER FOR TAX PURPOSES AND TAX RISKS — Limited partners are subject to income tax liabilities on the Partnership’s income, whether or not income is distributed, and may have an increased chance of being audited. Limited partners may also be subject to passive loss rules as a result of their investment.

Limited partners are required to file tax returns and pay income tax in those U.S. states and, in some circumstances, foreign jurisdictions in which the Partnership operates, as well as in the limited partner’s ~~state~~place of residence or domicile. Any costs of obtaining professional tax advice or preparation of tax returns are the responsibility of the limited partner and may be significant. Limited partners are liable for income taxes on their share of the Partnership’s taxable income. The amount of income the limited partner pays tax on can significantly exceed the net income earned on the Interests and the income distributed to such limited partner, which results in a disproportionate share of income being used to pay taxes.

A limited partner’s share of the Partnership’s income or losses could be subject to the passive loss rules. Under specific circumstances, certain income may be classified as portfolio income or passive income for purposes of the passive loss rules. In addition, under certain circumstances, a limited partner may be allocated a share of the Partnership’s passive losses, the deductibility of which will be limited by the passive loss rules.

The Partnership’s income tax returns may be audited by government authorities. Under U.S. federal audit and administrative procedures applicable to partnerships, any U.S. federal income taxes, penalties, and interest resulting from adjustments to Partnership tax items, including adjustments made pursuant to an IRS audit, generally will be imposed on the Partnership in the year in which the adjustments are made or otherwise become final. If, as a result of adjustments to Partnership tax items, ~~we are~~the Partnership is required to make payments in respect of taxes, penalties and interest, our cash available for distribution to our partners may be substantially reduced. Moreover, an audit of the Partnership's income tax returns may result in the audit of the returns of the limited partners and may require an amendment of their tax returns with the possibility of interest and penalty assessments.

The Partnership primarily conducts its U.S. home office operations from two ~~campus locations~~campuses in St. Louis, Missouri and one campus ~~location~~ in Tempe, Arizona. As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Partnership had 13 home office buildings. ~~One~~The Partnership owns 12 of the buildings and leases its Canada home office in Mississauga, Ontario and the land for the Tempe, Arizona campus location are leased through an operating lease, and the remaining 12 buildings are owned by the Partnership. The Partnership also leases its Canada home office facility in Mississauga, Ontario through an operating lease. campus.

The Partnership also maintains facilities in ~~15,361~~15,525 branch locations as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, which are located in the U.S. and Canada and are predominantly rented under cancelable leases. See Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes 32 and 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding lease liabilities and related party transactions, respectively.

Refer to Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1514 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the Partnership's legal proceedings.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

There is no established public trading market for the Partnership’s Interests and their assignment or transfer is prohibited without the express written consent of the Managing Partner (which is not expected to be given). As of February ~~26, 2021,~~25, 2022, the Partnership had ~~23,839~~23,381 limited partners.

~~The following information sets forth, for the past five years, selected financial data from the audited financial statements.~~

~~In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 480,~~ ~~Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity~~ (“ASC 480”), the Partnership presents net income of $0 on its Consolidated Statements of Income. See Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

~~Effective January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted ASC 842,~~ ~~Leases~~ ("ASC 842"), which requires lessees to recognize leases with terms greater than 12 months on the balance sheet as lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. Adoption of the new standard reduces the comparability of the Summary Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition from 2020 and 2019 to the other years presented within the summary above. See Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations, ~~and~~ the financial condition and the cash flows of the Partnership. Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes included in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For discussions surrounding the earliest of the three years presented below, refer to Part II, Item 7 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. All amounts are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

The Partnership broadly categorizes its net revenues into four categories: fee revenue, trade revenue, net interest and dividends revenue (net of interest expense) and other revenue. In the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income, fee revenue is composed of asset-based fees and account and activity fees. ~~Asset-based~~Program fees are ~~generally a percentage of~~based on the ~~total~~average daily market value of ~~specific~~client assets in ~~client accounts.~~the program, as well as contractual rates. These fees are impacted by changes in market values of the assets and by client dollars invested in and divested from the ~~accounts which generate asset-based fees and changes in market values of the assets.~~accounts. Account and activity fees and other revenue are impacted by the number of client accounts and the variety of services provided to those accounts, among other factors. Trade revenue is composed of commissions and principal transactions revenue. Commissions are earned from the distribution of mutual fund shares, the purchase or sale of ~~mutual fund shares~~equities and ~~equities as well as~~ the purchase of insurance products. Principal transactions revenue primarily results from the Partnership's distribution of and participation in principal trading activities in municipal obligations, over-the-counter corporate obligations, and certificates of deposit. Trade revenue is impacted by the ~~number of financial advisors,~~ trading volume (client dollars invested), mix of the products in which clients invest, size of trades, margins earned on the transactions and market volatility. Net interest and dividends revenue is impacted by the amount of cash and investments, receivables from and payables to clients, the variability of interest rates earned and paid on such balances, the number of Interests outstanding, and the balances of Partnership loans.

~~In the second half of March 2020, markets and interest rates experienced sudden declines due to the global uncertainty from the COVID-19 pandemic.~~ ~~While the federal funds rate remains near zero, markets during 2020 experienced a significant rebound compared to the end of the first quarter of 2020.~~ However, the full extent of the pandemic and the global governmental response, vaccine distribution, and related impact on society and the economy are not yet known, and further economic or market events could negatively impact the Partnership's financial results in future periods.

The Partnership has several ongoing measures in response to COVID-19 to support the health and well-being of its clients, partners and associates. The ongoing measures include, among other things, closure and phased reopening of branches to public access, establishing the technological capability for branches to serve clients remotely, virtually all home office associates working remotely with limited exceptions, temporary financial support for certain financial advisors, additional paid time off and medical plan benefits for associates related to COVID-19, and a travel halt. The Partnership is continuing to assess these and other existing measures adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and may consider additional potential measures in response to further economic or market events. Further, in response to COVID-19, the Partnership continues to review its business continuity plans and has had ongoing conversations with third-party providers to ensure the viability of their business operations supporting the Partnership. The Partnership has not experienced any significant disruptions in providing services to clients.

In 2020, the Partnership also implemented temporary measures to optimize firm resources and control costs in response to COVID-19 that it has since discontinued, including hiring reductions, wage freezes for certain associates, and a pause on ~~certain strategic firm initiatives and new branch and home office~~ ~~real estate projects. The impact of COVID-19, as well as the Partnership's response to it, continues to evolve and is uncertain.~~

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The following table sets forth the change in major categories of the Consolidated Statements of Income as well as several key related metrics for the last three years. Management of the Partnership relies on this financial information and the related metrics to evaluate the Partnership’s operating performance and financial condition.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The Partnership ended ~~2020~~2021 with ~~a 3%~~an 18% increase in client AUC to $1.8 trillion compared to 2020. Net new assets increased 41% to $93 billion in 2021 compared to 2020. Edward Jones ended 2021 with 18,823 financial advisors, a decrease of 402 compared to the end of 2020. This was due to the Partnership gradually restarting hiring following a temporary pause on the recruitment of non-licensed financial advisors in 2020, together with an intentional strategy to grow its impact by offering a plan and resources for both current financial advisors and ~~net~~ new ~~assets~~hires to ~~19,225 and $66 billion, respectively,~~promote branch team success.

Average client AUC increased 25% in 2021 to $1.7 trillion compared to ~~2019. Average client assets under care increased 9% in~~ 2020 ~~to $1,354 billion,~~ due to increases in the market value of client assets, ~~and~~as well as the cumulative impact of net new ~~assets gathered during 2020 compared to 2019.~~assets. Advisory programs' average ~~assets under care~~AUC increased ~~15%~~35% in ~~2020~~2021 to ~~$471~~$637 billion due to higher average market levels compared to 2020 and the continued increase in investment of client assets into advisory ~~programs and~~programs.

Net revenue increased 22% to $12,279 in 2021 compared to 2020. Results reflected a 28% increase in fee revenue, primarily due to higher average market levels, ~~compared to 2019.~~

~~Net revenue increased 7% to $10,063 in 2020 compared to 2019. Results reflected an 11% increase in asset-based fee revenue, primarily due to~~as well as the cumulative impact of net asset inflows into advisory programs in both 2020 and 2019, as well as average market increases. The increase in net revenue also reflected 9% growth in trade revenue due to an increase in the overall margin earned. The increase in net revenue was partially offset by the decrease in net interest and dividends revenue. Net interest and dividends revenue decreased due to the low interest rates throughout most of 2020 compared to 2019.programs.

Operating expenses increased 6%22% to ~~$8,778~~$10,674 in ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~2019,~~2020, primarily due to an increase in ~~compensation~~financial advisor and ~~benefits expense,~~ partially offset by a decrease in other operating expenses primarily as a result of reductions in the following areas: discretionary spending, travel, legal, strategic firm initiatives and real estate projects. variable compensation. Financial advisor compensation increased largely due to an increase in revenues on which commissions are ~~earned,~~earned. Variable compensation increased due to increases in the Partnership's profitability, including an increase in the number of ~~financial advisors,~~profitable branches and an overall increase in ~~compensation related to supporting new financial advisors~~branch profitability. The Firm benefited from ongoing cost savings, including limits on travel and ~~trainees. Home office and branch compensation increased primarily~~in-person events due to ~~higher wages.~~COVID-19.

~~Overall, the increase in net revenue, offset by the increase in operating expenses, generated~~Net income before allocations to partners ~~of $1,285, an 18% increase from 2019.~~

Given the global health, market, employment and economic uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Partnership cannot reliably predict the ultimate impact of COVID-19 on financial markets or its financial results, including how its clients, their trading activity, the financial markets or government regulators will respondincreased 25% to such uncertainty. As a result, the pandemic's effects on trade revenue are uncertain, and further economic or market events could have a negative impact. In addition, the pandemic's potential effects on the economy, market volatility and the Partnership's current and prospective clients could result$1,605 in ~~a reduction in client assets under care and slower net new asset growth, which could negatively impact future asset-based fee revenue.~~

~~Based on current information and if interest rates remain at record low levels, the Partnership expects lower net interest and dividends revenue in the first quarter of~~ 2021 compared to ~~the first quarter of~~ 2020.

The Partnership continues to assess its response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the event the Partnership begins to experience adverse impacts in response to further economic or market events, the Partnership may consider resuming or adopting measures to reduce future operating expenses.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ AND ~~2018~~2019

The discussion below details the significant fluctuations and their drivers for each of the major categories of the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fee revenue, which consists of asset-based fees and account and activity fees, increased ~~10%~~28% in ~~2020~~2021 to ~~$8,175.~~$10,424 compared to 2020. A discussion of fee revenue components follows.

~~Overall~~Total asset-based fee revenue increased ~~11%~~30% to ~~$7,515~~$9,737 in ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~2019,~~2020, primarily due to ~~a 15% increase~~increases in revenue from advisory program fees, as well as increases in service fee revenue. Growth in revenue from advisory programs ~~fees. Growth in advisory programs~~and service fees was due to higher average market levels in 2021 compared to 2020, as well as the continued investment of client assets in advisory programs and ~~higher average market levels in 2020. The decrease in other~~mutual fund assets held outside of advisory programs. Other asset-based fee revenue increased in 2021 compared to 2020 ~~reflected~~due to the growth in client asset values in non-advisory programs. These increases were partially offset by declines in cash solutions revenue ~~primarily from~~related to the Money Market Fund, which continues to be negatively impacted by increased fee waivers in order to maintain a positive client yield on the Money Market Fund following the decrease in the federal funds rate to near zero in March 2020. If interest rates remain at record low levels, the Partnership expects to continue to incur fee waivers in order to maintain a positive client yield on the Money Market Fund, thereby reducing other asset-based fee revenue.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

Trade revenue, which consists of commissions and principal transactions, ~~increased 9%~~remained constant at $1,719 in 2021 compared to ~~$1,719 during~~ 2020. A discussion of trade revenue components follows.


		Years Ended December 31,												% Change							Years Ended December 31,												% Change
		2020				2019				2018				2020 vs. 2019			2019 vs. 2018				2021				2020				2019				'21 vs. '20			'20 vs. '19
Trade revenue:
Commissions revenue:
Mutual funds		$	711			$	675			$	535				5	%		26	%		$	777			$	711			$	675				9	%		5	%
Equities			681				484				497				41	%		-3	%			603				681				484				-11	%		41	%
Insurance products and other			268				316				288				-15	%		10	%			299				268				316				12	%		-15	%
Total commissions revenue			1,660				1,475				1,320				13	%		12	%			1,679				1,660				1,475				1	%		13	%
Principal transactions			59				106				142				-44	%		-25	%			40				59				106				-32	%		-44	%
Total trade revenue		$	1,719			$	1,581			$	1,462				9	%		8	%		$	1,719			$	1,719			$	1,581				—			9	%

Related metrics:
Client dollars invested ($ billions)⁽¹⁾:
Mutual funds																					$	47.7	45	%	$	41.1	36	%	$	36.4	31	%		16	%		13	%
Equities		$	46	40	%	$	30	26	%	$	32	29	%		53	%		-6	%			42.1	40	%		46.0	40	%		30.4	26	%		-8	%		51	%
Mutual funds			41	36	%		37	31	%		26	23	%		11	%		42	%
Insurance products and other			6	5	%		6	5	%		6	5	%		—			—				6.9	7	%		6.4	6	%		6.4	5	%		8	%		—
Principal transactions			21	19	%		45	38	%		48	43	%		-53	%		-6	%			9.2	8	%		21.0	18	%		44.8	38	%		-56	%		-53	%
Total client dollars invested		$	114	100	%	$	118	100	%	$	112	100	%		-3	%		5	%		$	105.9	100	%	$	114.5	100	%	$	118.0	100	%		-8	%		-3	%

Margin per $1,000 invested		$	15.0			$	13.4			$	13.1				12	%		2	%		$	16.2			$	15.0			$	13.4				8	%		12	%
U.S. business days			253				252				251				—			—				252				253				252				—			—

⁽¹⁾Percentages represent client dollars invested in each product as a percent of total client dollars invested.	⁽¹⁾Percentages represent client dollars invested in each product as a percent of total client dollars invested.																			(1) Percentages represent client dollars invested in each product as a percent of total client dollars invested.

~~The increase~~Trade revenue remained constant in ~~trade revenue in~~2021 compared to 2020 ~~was~~ due to an increase in commissions revenue ~~partially~~that was offset by a decrease in principal transactions revenue. Commissions revenue increased ~~primarily~~ due to ~~higher~~increases in overall ~~margins from~~margin earned, which increased due to a change in product mix with a higher ~~proportion~~portion of client dollars invested in ~~equities and~~ mutual funds ~~which~~and insurance products that earn higher margins than equities and principal transaction ~~products, although~~products. Despite higher overall margins, margins earned on mutual funds ~~and equities~~ have ~~been decreasing~~decreased due to changes in ~~the~~ mutual fund fee structures, ~~and~~which has partially offset the increase in mutual funds revenue resulting from higher ~~volume equity trades.~~client dollars invested. The increase in commissions revenue was partially offset by the decrease in equities revenue, which was primarily due to lower client dollars invested compared to 2020. Principal transactions revenue decreased as a result of a decrease in client dollars invested ~~due to the decline in interest rates on those products during 2020~~ compared to the prior year. The increase in trade revenue also reflected significant increases in first quarter trade revenue as the Partnership experienced a significant increase in client dollars invested in equities due to lower securities prices as global markets became increasingly volatile in the second half of March 2020 due to the ~~uncertainties surrounding the impacts of COVID-19.~~ low interest rate environment.

Net interest and dividends revenue decreased ~~59%~~30% to ~~$105~~$73 in 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to interest rates remaining at record low levels since the Federal Reserve cut the federal funds effective rate to near zero in March 2020, which began impacting results in the second quarter of 2020 and therefore was only partially reflected in the results of 2020. Despite increases in short-term investment balances in 2021, interest ~~revenue~~income decreased ~~due to the~~from lower ~~federal funds rate~~average interest rates earned on those balances compared to ~~the prior year. Interest revenue also decreased due to lower interest earned on lower client margin balances.~~2020. The decrease in interest revenue in 2021 was partially offset by a decrease in customer credit interest expense in ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~2019.~~ 2020, primarily due to the low rate paid on client's cash held in their accounts in 2021, which was only partially reflected in the results of 2020 due to the timing of the customer credit rate decrease.

The majority of interest expense in ~~2020~~2021 consisted of the minimum 7.5% annual return on the face amount of limited partnership capital paid to limited partners. The 7.5% rate is fixed and is not impacted by the low interest rate environment.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

Based on current information and if interest rates remain at record low levels, the Partnership expects lower net interest and dividends revenue in the first quarter of 2021 compared to the first quarter of 2020.

Operating expenses increased 6%22% in ~~2020~~2021 to ~~$8,778,~~$10,674 compared to 2020, primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits expense. A discussion of operating expense components follows.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The increase in operating expenses in 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily due to compensation and benefits expense (described below) increasing ~~10%~~21% to ~~$7,186~~$8,720 in ~~2020.~~ ~~This increase is partially offset by a decrease~~2021, in ~~other~~addition to increases in communications and data processing and professional and consulting fees due to intentional investments in technology infrastructure, digital initiatives, virtual enablement tools and test and learn pilot programs. Other operating expenses increased due to increases in ~~2020 primarily as a result of reductions in the following areas: discretionary spending,~~advertising, legal and other various items. The Firm benefitted from ongoing cost savings, including limits on travel ~~legal, strategic firm initiatives~~ and ~~real estate projects.~~in-person events due to COVID-19.

Financial advisor compensation and benefits expense increased 8%20% in ~~2020~~2021 due to an increase in revenues on which commissions are ~~earned, growth in the number of financial advisors and an increase in compensation related to supporting new financial advisors and trainees.~~

earned. Home office and branch compensation and benefits ~~expense~~ increased 4%10% in ~~2020,~~2021 primarily due to higher ~~wages. The average~~wages from an increase in the number of ~~the Partnership’s home office~~ associates, ~~slightly increased~~as well as an increase in ~~2020 compared to 2019, and the average number of branch office administrators ("BOAs") increased 1% in 2020 compared to 2019.~~ healthcare costs.

Variable compensation expands and contracts in relation to the Partnership’s related profitability and margin earned. A significant portion of the Partnership’s profits is allocated to variable compensation and paid to associates in the form of bonuses and profit sharing. Variable compensation increased ~~26%~~38% to ~~$1,414~~$1,949 in ~~2020~~2021 due to increases in the Partnership's profitability, including an increase in the number of profitable branches and an overall increase in branch profitability. ~~Given the uncertainty of the ongoing impacts of COVID-19, the Partnership cannot reliably predict their effects on future profitability and variable compensation.~~

The Partnership uses the ratios of both the number of home office associates and the number of BOAs per 100 financial advisors, as well as operating expenses per financial advisor (excluding financial advisor compensation, variable compensation and fund sub-adviser fees), as key metrics in managing its costs. In ~~2020~~2021 the average number of home office associates and BOAs per 100 financial advisors ~~decreased 5%~~increased 4% and 4%3%, ~~respectively.~~respectively, primarily due to the increase in the average number of home office associates and BOAs. The operating expenses per financial advisor ~~decreased 9%~~increased 17%, due to ~~a decrease~~the increase in operating expenses ~~(excluding~~from the intentional investments in the Firm's technology infrastructure, digital initiatives, virtual enablement tools and test and learn pilot programs, as well as increases in advertising, legal and other various items, which were spread across a decreased average number of financial ~~advisor compensation, variable compensation and fund sub-advisor fees) and an increase~~advisors in 2021.

~~The Partnership remains committed~~advisors, a decrease of 402 compared to ~~financial advisor growth to continue to serve existing clients and future clients and create a positive impact in our communities. However, in response~~2020. This was due to the ~~COVID-19 pandemic during 2020, the~~ Partnership ~~implemented measures to optimize firm resources and control costs, including~~gradually restarting hiring following a temporary pause on the recruitment of non-licensed financial ~~advisors. Despite the temporary hiring pause, the Partnership grew the number of financial~~ advisors ~~3% to 19,225~~ in 2020, ~~compared to 2019.~~

~~The Partnership plans to continue~~together with an intentional strategy to grow its impact by focusing on hiring both experienced financial advisors and non-licensed candidates in future periods and increasing the number of clients and communities it serves. Currently, the Partnership is gradually restarting hiring to enable it to prioritize support for all financial advisors, which may result in fewer financial advisors hired than historically experienced. The Partnership is committed to an innovative and intentional strategy that offersoffering a plan and resources for both current financial advisors and new ~~hires. Additionally, the Partnership continues~~hires to ~~make investments in virtual business enablement tools to help its~~promote branch ~~teams be successful with the ongoing limitations on in-person client prospecting and consultations.~~team success.

~~Due to the uncertainty of the impacts of COVID-19 throughout the year, the Partnership implemented measures to support the health and well-being of its clients and associates,~~ ~~as well as measures to optimize firm resources and control costs.~~ The measures included a temporary hiring reduction, decreased discretionary spending and a travel halt, which helped increase the Partnership's profitability in 2020 compared to 2019. The Partnership continues to assess the measures adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Partnership has two operating and reportable segments based upon geographic location, the U.S. and Canada. Canada segment information, as reported in the following table, is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership’s Canada operations. The U.S. segment information is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements less the Canada segment information as presented. Pre-variable income represents income before variable compensation expense and before allocations to partners. This is consistent with how management views the segments to assess performance.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

to assess performance. COVID-19 is a global pandemic that has resulted in significant uncertainty; however, based on current information, the Partnership expects COVID-19 to impact the future financial results of the segments similarly. The following table shows financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments.

~~The following table shows financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments.~~

Years Ended December 31,

% Change

2020

2019

2018

2020 vs. 2019

2019 vs. 2018

Net revenue:

U.S.

$
9,805

$
9,127

$
8,233

7
%

11
%
Canada

258

242

236

7
%

3
%
Total net revenue

10,063

9,369

8,469

7
%

11
%

Operating expenses (excluding variable
compensation):

U.S.

7,132

6,933

6,261

3
%

11
%
Canada

232

226

220

3
%

3
%
Total operating expenses

7,364

7,159

6,481

3
%

10
%

Pre-variable income:

U.S.

2,673

2,194

1,972

22
%

11
%
Canada

26

16

16

63
%

—

Total pre-variable income

2,699

2,210

1,988

22
%

11
%

Variable compensation:

U.S.

1,385

1,094

975

27
%

12
%
Canada

29

24

23

21
%

4
%
Total variable compensation

1,414

1,118

998

26
%

12
%

Income (loss) before allocations to partners:

U.S.

1,288

1,100

997

17
%

10
%
Canada

(3
)

(8
)

(7
)

63
%

-14
%
Total income before allocations to partners

$
1,285

$
1,092

$
990

18
%

10
%

Client assets under care ($ billions):

U.S.

At year end

$
1,514.0

$
1,320.5

$
1,080.3

15
%

22
%
Average

$
1,326.2

$
1,212.3

$
1,120.0

9
%

8
%
Canada

At year end

$
32.0

$
28.1

$
22.6

14
%

24
%
Average

$
27.7

$
25.8

$
24.2

7
%

7
%

Net new assets for the year ($ billions):

U.S.

$
64.1

$
62.0

$
62.8

3
%

-1
%
Canada

$
2.0

$
1.7

$
1.8

18
%

-6
%

Financial advisors (actual):

U.S.

At year end

18,321

17,830

16,797

3
%

6
%
Average

18,211

17,328

16,078

5
%

8
%
Canada

At year end

904

874

818

3
%

7
%
Average

905

843

786

7
%

7
%

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

Net revenue increased 7%22% to ~~$9,805~~$11,946 in 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to an increase in asset-based fee revenue. Asset-based fee revenue increased ~~11%~~29% to ~~$7,341~~$9,496 in ~~2020~~2021 led by an increase in revenue from advisory programs fees ~~largely~~primarily due to higher average market levels in 2021 compared to 2020, as well as the cumulative impact of net asset inflows into advisory ~~programs, as well as higher average market levels~~programs.

Operating expenses (excluding variable compensation) increased 19% to $8,457 in ~~2020~~2021 compared to ~~2019. The increase in net revenue also reflected growth in trade revenue of 9% to $1,667 in~~ 2020 due to an increase in ~~overall margin earned.~~

~~Operating expenses (excluding variable compensation) increased 3% to $7,132 in 2020, primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits expense for~~ financial ~~advisors and home office and branch associates,~~ partially offset by a decrease in other operating expenses in 2020 primarily as a result of reductions in the following areas: discretionary spending, travel, legal, strategic firm initiatives and real estate projects. ~~Financial~~ advisor compensation and benefits expense ~~increased~~ primarily due to an increase in revenues on which commissions are ~~earned, growth~~earned.

Net income before allocations to partners increased 23% to $1,582 in ~~the number of financial advisors and an increase in compensation related~~2021 compared to ~~supporting new financial advisors and trainees. Home office and branch compensation and benefits expense increased primarily due to higher wages in~~ 2020.

Net revenue increased 7%29% to ~~$258~~$333 in 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to ~~an increase~~increases in asset-based fee revenue. Asset-based fee revenue increased ~~10%~~39% to ~~$174~~$241 in ~~2020,~~2021, led by an increase in revenue from advisory programs fees ~~largely~~primarily due to higher average market levels in 2021 compared to 2020, as well as the cumulative impact of net asset inflows into advisory ~~programs, as well as higher average market levels in 2020 compared to 2019.~~programs.

Operating expenses (excluding variable compensation) increased 3%16% to ~~$232~~$268 in 2021 compared to 2020 due to an increase in financial advisor compensation ~~attributable~~and benefits expense primarily due to ~~growth in the number of financial advisors and~~ an increase in ~~compensation related~~revenues on which commissions are earned.

Canada became profitable in 2021. Net income before allocations to ~~supporting new financial advisors and trainees.~~partners increased $26 to $23 in 2021 compared to 2020.

See Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors – Risk Related to the Partnership's Business – Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives, for a discussion of several proposed, potential and recently enacted Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives that the Partnership is continuing to monitor.

The Partnership estimates approximately 30%~~, 30%, and 35%~~ of its total revenue was derived from sales and services related to mutual fund and insurance products in 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018, respectively.~~2019. In addition, the Partnership derived ~~13%~~12%, ~~14%~~13% and 14% of its total revenue infor the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, from one mutual fund company. The revenue generated from this company relates to business conducted with the Partnership’s U.S. segment.

Significant reductions in these revenues due to changes in the mutual ~~fund~~funds industry affecting fee structures that result in decreased margins earned, regulatory reform or other changes to the Partnership’s relationship with mutual fund or insurance companies could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The Partnership requires liquidity to cover its operating expenses, net capital requirements, capital expenditures, distributions to partners and redemptions of Partnership interests, as well as to facilitate client transactions. The principal sources for meeting the Partnership’s liquidity requirements include existing liquidity and capital resources of the Partnership, discussed further below, and funds generated from operations. The Partnership believes that the liquidity provided by these sources will be sufficient to meet its capital and liquidity requirements for the next twelve months. Depending on conditions in the capital markets and other factors, the Partnership will, from time to time, consider the issuance of debt and additional Partnership capital, the proceeds of which could be used to meet growth needs or for other purposes.

As of December 31, 2020, the Partnership had $3,810 in cash, cash equivalents and highly liquid investments, consisting of securities purchased under agreements to resell, U.S. treasuries, certificates of deposit and a money market fund, $3,075 in Partnership capital and no debt. The Partnership has committed and uncommitted lines of credit in place should a liquidity need arise but has not drawn upon these lines. The Partnership believes that its financial position remains strong as it addresses the uncertainty of the ongoing impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and, based on current information, does not anticipate any significant changes to its current liquidity or capital position.

The Partnership’s growth in capital has historically been the result of the sale of Interests to its associates and existing limited partners, the sale of subordinated limited partnership interests to its current or retiring general partners, and retention of a portion of general partner earnings.

The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January 12, 2018, to register $450 of Interests issuable pursuant to the 2018 Plan. The Partnership issued approximately $380, ~~million,~~ $1, ~~million~~$5 and ~~$3 million~~$4 of Interests under the 2018 Plan in ~~early~~ 2019, 2020, 2021 and ~~2021,~~early 2022, respectively. The Partnership plans to terminate the 2018 Plan in 2022 and deregister all remaining ~~$66 million of~~unsold Interests ~~may be issued~~ under the 2018 Plan. Before the 2018 Plan is terminated, the Partnership may issue the remaining $60 of Interests under that plan at the discretion of the Managing ~~Partner in~~Partner. The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the ~~future.~~SEC on December 8, 2021, to register an additional $700 of Interests issuable pursuant to the 2021 Plan. Proceeds from the offering under the ~~2018~~2021 Plan are expected to be used to meet growth needs or for ~~working capital and general firm purposes and to ensure there is adequate general liquidity of the Partnership for future needs.~~other purposes. The issuance of Interests reduces the Partnership’s net interest income and profitability.

The Partnership’s capital subject to mandatory redemption at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, was ~~$3,075,~~$3,235, an increase of ~~$118~~$160 from December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. This increase in Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption was primarily due to the retention of a portion of general partner earnings ($~~130)~~165), additional capital contributions related to limited partner, subordinated limited partner and general partner interests ($~~1, $49~~5, $61 and ~~$163,~~$222, respectively) and the net decrease in Partnership loans outstanding ($~~19)~~20), partially offset by the redemption of limited partner, subordinated limited partner and general partner interests ($~~13, $37~~17, $19 and ~~$194,~~$277, respectively). During each of the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, the Partnership retained 13.8% of income allocated to general partners.

Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, a partner’s capital is required to be redeemed by the Partnership in the event of the ~~partner’s~~partner's death, ~~or withdrawal from the Partnership,~~ subject to compliance with ongoing regulatory capital requirements. In the event of a partner’s death, the Partnership generally redeems the partner’s capital within six months. The Partnership has restrictions in place which govern the withdrawal of capital. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, limited partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership are ~~to be~~ repaid their capital in three equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their withdrawal notice is received by the Managing Partner. The capital of general partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership is converted to subordinated limited partnership capital or, at the discretion of the Managing Partner, redeemed by the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners requesting withdrawal are repaid their capital in six equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their request for withdrawal of ~~contributed~~ capital is received by the Managing Partner. The ~~Partnership’s~~ Managing Partner has discretion to waive or modify these withdrawal restrictions and to accelerate the return of capital.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the ~~Executive Committee)~~ELT who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions. In limited circumstances, a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while he or she still has an outstanding Partnership loan. It is anticipated that, of the future general and subordinated limited partnership capital contributions (in each case, other than for ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members) requiring financing, the majority will be financed through Partnership loans. Loans made by the Partnership to such partners are generally for a period of one year but are expected to be renewed and bear interest at the ~~interest rate defined in~~greater of the ~~loan documents.~~Prime Rate for the last business day of the prior fiscal month or 3.25% per annum. The Partnership recognizes interest income for the interest earned related to these loans. Partners borrowing from the Partnership will be required to repay such loans by applying the earnings received from the Partnership to such loans, net of amounts retained by the Partnership, amounts distributed for income taxes and 5% of earnings distributed to the partner. The Partnership has full recourse against any partner that defaults on loan obligations to the Partnership. The Partnership does not anticipate that partner loans will have an adverse impact on the Partnership’s short-term liquidity or capital resources.

Any partner may also choose to have individual banking arrangements for their Partnership capital contributions. Any bank financing of capital contributions is in the form of unsecured bank loan agreements and is between the individual and the bank. The Partnership does not guarantee these bank loans, nor can the partner pledge ~~his or her~~their partnership interest as collateral for the bank loan. The Partnership performs certain administrative functions in connection with its limited partners who have elected to finance a portion of their Partnership capital contributions through individual unsecured bank loan agreements from banks with whom the Partnership has other banking relationships. For all limited partner capital contributions financed through such bank loan agreements, each agreement instructs the Partnership to apply the proceeds from the redemption of that individual’s capital account to the repayment of the limited partner's bank loan prior to any funds being released to the partner. In addition, the partner is required to apply Partnership earnings, net of any distributions to pay taxes, to service the interest and principal on the bank loan. Should a partner’s individual bank loan not be renewed upon maturity for any reason, the Partnership could experience increased requests for capital liquidations, which could adversely impact the Partnership’s liquidity. In addition, partners who finance all or a portion of their capital contributions with bank financing may be more likely to request the withdrawal of capital to meet bank financing requirements should the partners experience a period of reduced earnings. As a partnership, any withdrawals by general partners, subordinated limited partners or limited partners would reduce the Partnership’s available liquidity and capital.

Many of the same banks that provide financing to limited partners also provide financing to the Partnership. To the extent these banks increase credit available to the partners, financing available to the Partnership may be reduced.

The Partnership, while not a party to any partner unsecured bank loan agreements, does facilitate making payments of allocated income to certain banks on behalf of the limited partner. The following table represents amounts related to Partnership loans as well as bank loans (for which the Partnership facilitates certain administrative functions). Partners may have arranged their own bank loans to finance their Partnership capital for which the Partnership does not facilitate certain administrative functions and therefore any such loans are not included in the table.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

Historically, neither the amount of Partnership capital financed with individual loans as indicated in the table above, nor the amount of partner withdrawal requests, has had a significant impact on the Partnership’s liquidity or capital resources.

The following table shows the composition of the Partnership’s aggregate bank lines of credit in place as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019:~~2020:

In accordance with the terms of the Partnership's $500 committed revolving line of credit (the "2018 Credit Facility") entered into in September 2018, the Partnership is required to maintain a leverage ratio of no more than 35% and minimum Partnership capital, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals and Partnership loans, of at least $1,884. In addition, Edward Jones is required to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of at least $1,344 and minimum regulatory net capital of at least 6% of aggregate debit items as calculated under the alternative method. The Partnership has the ability to draw on various types of loans. The associated interest rate depends on the type of loan, duration of the loan, whether the loan is secured or unsecured and the amount of leverage. Contractual rates are based on an index rate plus the applicable ~~rate.~~spread. The 2018 Credit Facility is intended to provide short-term liquidity to the Partnership should the need arise. As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Partnership was in compliance with all covenants related to the 2018 Credit Facility.

In addition, the Partnership has multiple uncommitted secured lines of credit totaling $390 that are subject to change at the discretion of the banks. The Partnership also has an additional uncommitted line of credit where the amount and the associated collateral requirements are at the bank's discretion in the event of a borrowing. Based on credit market conditions and the uncommitted nature of these credit facilities, it is possible that these lines of credit could decrease or not be available in the future. Actual borrowing capacity on secured lines is based on availability of client margin securities or firm-owned securities, which would serve as collateral on loans in the event the Partnership borrowed against these lines.

~~Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued~~

There were no amounts outstanding on the 2018 Credit Facility or the uncommitted lines of credit as of December 31, ~~2020 or December 31, 2019. In addition, the~~2021 and 2020. The Partnership did not have any draws against these lines of credit during the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, except for periodically testing draw procedures.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Partnership had ~~$1,125~~$1,835 in cash and cash equivalents and ~~$1,714~~$1,529 in securities purchased under agreements to resell, which generally have maturities of less than one week. This totaled ~~$2,839~~$3,364 of Partnership liquidity as of December 31, ~~2020, a 5%~~2021, an 18% ($~~132)~~525) increase from ~~$2,707~~$2,839 at December 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The Partnership had ~~$17,918~~$20,179 and ~~$10,387~~$17,918 in cash and investments segregated under federal regulations as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, which was not available for general use. As of December 31, 2020, the Partnership held $971 in U.S. treasuries to help facilitate cash management and maintain firm liquidity. As of December 31, 2020, $12,051 of the cash and investments segregated under federal regulations balance consisted of U.S. treasuries, compared with $3,394 as of December 31, 2019. Given global health, market, employment and economic uncertainty from COVID-19, the Partnership increased the proportion of U.S. treasuries to focus on principal protection of the portfolio. The increase in cash and investments segregated under federal regulations was primarily due to an increase in cash held in clients' accounts, ~~resulting in a corresponding~~which was partially offset by the increase in ~~payables~~receivables from clients on margin balances. The Partnership also held $413 and $971 in government and agency obligations as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, primarily to ~~clients.~~help facilitate cash management and maintain firm liquidity. The decrease in the government and agency obligations balance as of December 31, 2021 was partly due to the timing of maturities and was partially reflected in higher firm cash as of December 31, 2021. Changes in cash were also due to timing of daily client cash activity in relation to the weekly segregation requirement.

The Partnership continues to evaluate its cash management strategy. Banks have experienced a significant increase in cash deposits due to the market and economic uncertainty from COVID-19, which may impact the Partnership's ability to continue to find financial institutions at which to place funds for principal protection while earning a reasonable rate of return on those funds.

In 2020, the Partnership implemented a temporary pause on certain strategic firm initiatives to help control costs in response to COVID-19, which reduced the actual capital expenditures to $129 from the 2020 estimate of $175. The Partnership estimates 2021 capital spending of approximately $225 as the pause on certain strategic firm initiatives has been lifted, and the Partnership expects to invest in software and other technology upgrades, real estate and construction and facilities improvements at various branch offices.

As a result of its activities as a U.S. broker-dealer, Edward Jones is subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule and capital compliance rules of the FINRA Rule 4110. Under the alternative method permitted by the rules, Edward Jones must maintain minimum net capital ~~as defined,~~ equal to the greater of $0.25 or 2% of aggregate debit items arising from client transactions. The net capital rules also provide that Edward Jones’ partnership capital may not be withdrawn if ~~the~~ resulting net capital would be less than minimum requirements. Additionally, certain withdrawals ~~of partnership capital~~ require the approval of the SEC and FINRA to the extent they exceed defined levels, even though such withdrawals would not cause net capital to be less than minimum requirements.

~~The Partnership’s~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ is a registered broker-dealer regulated by IIROC. Under the regulations prescribed by IIROC, ~~the Partnership's~~EJ Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiary~~ is required to maintain minimum levels of risk-adjusted capital, which are dependent on the nature of ~~the Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary's~~EJ Canada's assets and operations.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued

The following table shows the Partnership’s capital figures for its U.S. and Canada broker-dealer subsidiaries as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019:~~2020:

U.S. net capital, Canada regulatory risk-adjusted capital and the related capital percentages may fluctuate on a daily basis. ~~In addition, Trust Co. was in compliance with its regulatory capital requirements.~~

The Partnership ~~does not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements.~~

~~The following table summarizes the Partnership’s portion~~enters into long-term lease agreements for branch offices, resulting in a total of ~~long-term rental~~$343 in lease commitments that are non-cancellable as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. Subsequent to December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, these commitments may fluctuate based on changing business needs and conditions. For further disclosure regarding ~~rental~~lease commitments, see Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In ~~addition to the above table,~~2021, the Partnership ~~had the 2018 Credit Facility outstanding as~~invested significantly in software and other technology upgrades, real estate, construction and facilities improvements, resulting in capital expenditures of ~~December 31, 2020 (see Note 9~~$234. The Partnership estimates 2022 capital spending of approximately $223. The Partnership expects to ~~the Consolidated Financial Statements).~~ continue to invest in software and other technology upgrades and construction and facilities improvements at various branch offices.

Additionally, the Partnership would ~~incur~~have incurred termination fees of approximately ~~$103~~$483 at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 in the event the Partnership terminated existing contractual commitments with certain vendors providing ongoing services primarily for information technology to support the Partnership's strategic initiatives, in addition to services for operations and marketing. As of December 31, 2021, the Partnership made no such decision to terminate these services. These termination fees will decrease over the related contract periods, which generally expire within the next three years.

The Partnership expects to utilize existing cash and cash earned from operations to meet the obligations disclosed above.

The Partnership’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require judgment and involve estimation processes to determine its assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses which affect its results of operations.

The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following ~~critical policy~~estimate requires ~~estimates that involve~~ a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

Accruals for Contingencies. The Partnership accrues when appropriate for potential losses that may arise out of various legal and regulatory matters, including arbitrations, class actions, other litigation, and examinations, investigations and proceedings by governmental authorities, SROs and other regulators, to the extent that the amount of such potential losses can be estimated, in accordance with ~~FASB ASC~~Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") No. 450, ~~Contingencies~~.Contingencies. See Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1514 for further discussion of these items. The Partnership regularly monitors its exposures to potential losses. The Partnership’s aggregate accrued liability with respect to litigation and regulatory

~~Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, continued~~

proceedings represents its estimate of probable losses, as determined under FASB ASC No. 450, Contingencies,, after considering, among other factors, whether a putative class

action exists, the progress of each case, court rulings or judgments, the Partnership’s experience with other legal and regulatory matters, the perceived likelihood of settlement, outcomes of similar public cases and discussions with legal counsel. Facts and circumstances relating to legal and regulatory matters can rapidly change and are not always controllable by the Partnership, which may contribute to uncertainty and result in volatility in the estimate of losses.

Included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements are additional discussions of the Partnership’s accounting policies.

The Partnership’s net assets are primarily monetary, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, firm-owned securities, and receivables, less liabilities. Monetary net assets are primarily liquid in nature and would not be significantly affected by inflation. Inflation and future expectations of inflation influence securities prices, as well as activity levels in the securities markets. As a result, profitability and capital may be impacted by inflation and inflationary expectations. Additionally, inflation’s impact on the Partnership’s operating expenses may affect profitability to the extent that additional costs are not recoverable through increased prices of services offered by the Partnership.

~~See Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statement and Supplementary Data – Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently adopted accounting standards.~~None.

As disclosed in the Partnership's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 4, 2020, Vincent J. Ferrari, general partner of the Partnership, member of the Partnership’s Executive and Management Committees, Chairman of the Partnership’s Audit Committee and the Partnership’s Chief Administrative Officer, has retired after 17 years of service to Edward Jones and the Partnership effective December 31, 2020. Mr. Ferrari joined Edward Jones in 2003 as a senior director in Information Systems. He was named a principal in 2004 and Chief Information Officer in 2007.

Additionally, as disclosed in the Partnership's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 10, 2020, Penny Pennington, Managing Partner, announced the appointment of general partner Lisa Dolan, age 54, to the Partnership’s Executive Committee. It was also announced that Ms. Dolan has been named Chief Operating Officer for Edward Jones with responsibility for leading Operations, Service, Firm Analytics, Strategic Enablement and Planning and Workplace Services. Ms. Dolan joined the Edward Jones Finance division in 2005 with responsibility for tax and partnership accounting. She was named a principal in 2007 after which her responsibilities have expanded to include financial and regulatory reporting, expenditure management, compensation accounting and finance systems. Ms. Dolan was appointed to the Partnership's Audit Committee in 2014. In 2016, she assumed responsibility for the Finance division.

Various levels of management within the Partnership manage the Partnership’s risk exposure. Position limits in inventory accounts are established and monitored on an ongoing basis. Credit risk related to various financing activities is reduced by the industry practice of obtaining and maintaining collateral. The Partnership monitors its exposure to counterparty risk through the use of credit exposure information, the monitoring of collateral values and the establishment of credit limits. For further discussion of monitoring, see the Risk Management discussion in Part III, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of this Annual Report. All amounts are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

The Partnership is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Such changes in interest rates impact the income from interest-earning assets, primarily receivables from clients on margin balances and short-term, primarily overnight, investments, which are primarily comprised of cash and cash equivalents, investments segregated under federal regulations, and securities purchased under agreements to resell, which averaged ~~$2.9~~$3.2 billion and ~~$16.2~~$21.5 billion, respectively, for the year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. These margin receivables and investments earned interest at an average annual rate of ~~approximately 410~~approximately 397 and 379 basis points ~~(4.10%~~ (3.97% and ~~.37%~~0.09%), respectively, in ~~2020.~~2021. Changes in interest rates also have an impact on the expense related to the liabilities that finance these assets, such as amounts payable to clients.

The Partnership performed an analysis of its financial instruments and assessed the related interest rate risk and materiality in accordance with the SEC rules. Under current market conditions and based on current levels of interest-earning assets and the liabilities that finance these assets, the Partnership estimates that a ~~100 basis~~100-basis point (1.00%) increase in short-term interest rates could increase its annual net interest income by approximately $131. Conversely, the Partnership estimates that a reduction in short-term interest rates to zero could decrease the Partnership’s annual net interest income by approximately ~~$19.~~$15. A ~~100 basis~~100-basis point (1.00%) decrease in short-term interest rates was not utilized for this comparison because it would result in negative rates given that rates are already near zero.

For information related to the impacts of COVID-19 on interest rates and the Partnership's market risk, see Part II, Item 7 – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Annual Report.

Management of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and all wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Partnership”), is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Partnership’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Partnership’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As of the end of the Partnership’s ~~2020~~2021 fiscal year, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 was effective.

The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management of the Partnership; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on its financial statements.

The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their accompanying report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020.~~

To the ~~Executive Committee~~Enterprise Leadership Team and Partners ofThe Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.:

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and its subsidiaries (the "Partnership") as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, of changes in partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, including the related notes and the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).We also have audited the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020, and the results of itsoperations and itscash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2020~~ 2021in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

~~As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.~~

The Partnership's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ~~("PCAOB")~~(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to theconsolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

As described in Notes 1 and 43 to the consolidated financial statements, ~~$5.537~~$7.421 billion of the firm's total asset-based fee revenue of ~~$7.515~~$9.737 billion for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 was generated from program fees for investment advisory services provided within the Partnership’s advisory programs. Revenue from advisory programs fees are derived from fees determined by the underlying value of client assets. Advisory program contracts outline the investment advisory services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a definite end date. Program fees are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program as well as contractual rates and are charged to clients monthly and collected the following month.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to revenue from advisory program fees is a critical audit matter are the significant audit effort in performing procedures relating to the fees, which are calculated based on the valuation of client assets and the corresponding contractual rate charged to the client.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the recognition of revenue from advisory program fees. These procedures also included, for a sample of accounts, obtaining advisory program contracts and evaluating whether rates used in the calculations were consistent with the advisory program contracts, independently pricing the securities positions within the account, independently calculating the average assets under management, and independently calculating the advisory program fees.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


(Dollars in millions)	Limited Partnership Capital			Subordinated Limited Partnership Capital			General Partnership Capital			Total			Limited Partnership Capital			Subordinated Limited Partnership Capital			General Partnership Capital			Total
TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2017	$	956		$	499		$	1,340		$	2,795
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals		(66	)		(36	)		(188	)		(290	)
Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2017	$	890		$	463		$	1,152		$	2,505
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2017		—			3			294			297
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2017		890			466			1,446			2,802
Issuance of partnership interests		5			53			172			230
Redemption of partnership interests		(11	)		(11	)		(274	)		(296	)
Income allocated to partners		114			127			749			990
Distributions		(42	)		(86	)		(411	)		(539	)
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans		956			549			1,682			3,187
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2018		—			(4	)		(328	)		(332	)
TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2018	$	956		$	545		$	1,354		$	2,855		$	956		$	545		$	1,354		$	2,855
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals		(72	)		(41	)		(235	)		(348	)		(72	)		(41	)		(235	)		(348	)
Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2018	$	884		$	504		$	1,119		$	2,507		$	884		$	504		$	1,119		$	2,507
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2018		—			4			328			332			0			4			328			332
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2018		884			508			1,447			2,839			884			508			1,447			2,839
Issuance of partnership interests		380			53			163			596			380			53			163			596
Redemption of partnership interests		(15	)		(34	)		(179	)		(228	)		(15	)		(34	)		(179	)		(228	)
Income allocated to partners		166			130			796			1,092			166			130			796			1,092
Distributions		(56	)		(87	)		(432	)		(575	)		(56	)		(87	)		(432	)		(575	)
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans		1,359			570			1,795			3,724			1,359			570			1,795			3,724
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2019		—			(4	)		(356	)		(360	)		0			(4	)		(356	)		(360	)
TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2019	$	1,359		$	566		$	1,439		$	3,364		$	1,359		$	566		$	1,439		$	3,364
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals		(110	)		(43	)		(254	)		(407	)		(110	)		(43	)		(254	)		(407	)
Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2019	$	1,249		$	523		$	1,185		$	2,957		$	1,249		$	523		$	1,185		$	2,957
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2019		—			4			356			360			0			4			356			360
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2019		1,249			527			1,541			3,317			1,249			527			1,541			3,317
Issuance of partnership interests		1			49			163			213			1			49			163			213
Redemption of partnership interests		(13	)		(37	)		(194	)		(244	)		(13	)		(37	)		(194	)		(244	)
Income allocated to partners		189			149			947			1,285			189			149			947			1,285
Distributions		(64	)		(93	)		(484	)		(641	)		(64	)		(93	)		(484	)		(641	)
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans		1,362			595			1,973			3,930			1,362			595			1,973			3,930
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2020		—			(1	)		(340	)		(341	)		0			(1	)		(340	)		(341	)
TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2020	$	1,362		$	594		$	1,633		$	3,589		$	1,362		$	594		$	1,633		$	3,589
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals		(125	)		(56	)		(333	)		(514	)		(125	)		(56	)		(333	)		(514	)
Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2020	$	1,237		$	538		$	1,300		$	3,075		$	1,237		$	538		$	1,300		$	3,075
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2020														0			1			340			341
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2020														1,237			539			1,640			3,416
Issuance of partnership interests														5			61			222			288
Redemption of partnership interests														(17	)		(19	)		(277	)		(313	)
Income allocated to partners														208			189			1,208			1,605
Distributions														(72	)		(130	)		(718	)		(920	)
Total partnership capital, including capital financed with partnership loans														1,361			640			2,075			4,076
Partnership loans outstanding, December 31, 2021														0			0			(321	)		(321	)
TOTAL PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION, DECEMBER 31, 2021													$	1,361		$	640		$	1,754		$	3,755
Reserve for anticipated withdrawals														(136	)		(59	)		(325	)		(520	)
Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals, December 31, 2021													$	1,225		$	581		$	1,429		$	3,235

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

(Dollars in millions, except per unit information and the number of financial advisors)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Partnership’s Business and Basis of Accounting. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and all wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Partnership” or "JFC"). The financial position of the Partnership’s subsidiaries in Canada as of November 30, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020 are included in the Partnership's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and the results for the twelve month periods ended November 30, 2021, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018~~2019 are included in the Partnership’s Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partnership Capital Subject to Mandatory Redemption and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows because of the timing of the Partnership’s financial reporting process.

The Partnership’s principal operating subsidiary, Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (“Edward Jones”), is a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser in the United States (“U.S.”), and one of Edward Jones’ subsidiaries, Edward Jones (an Ontario limited partnership) ("EJ Canada"), is a registered broker-dealer in Canada. Through these entities, the Partnership primarily serves individual investors in the U.S. and Canada. Edward Jones is a retail brokerage business and primarily derives revenues from fees for providing investment advisory and other account services to its clients, fees for assets held by clients, the distribution of mutual fund shares, and commissions for the purchase or sale of securities and the purchase of insurance products. The Partnership conducts business throughout the U.S. and Canada with its clients, various brokers, dealers, clearing organizations, depositories and banks. For financial information related to the Partnership’s ~~two~~2 operating segments for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, see Note 1615 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Trust services are offered to Edward Jones’ U.S. clients through Edward Jones Trust Company (“Trust Co.”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership. Olive Street Investment Advisers, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, provides investment advisory services to the eight sub-advised mutual funds comprising the Bridge Builder® Trust ("BB Trust"). Passport Research, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, provides investment advisory services to the sub-advised Edward Jones Money Market Fund (the "Money Market Fund").

The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which require the use of certain estimates by management in determining the Partnership’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. ~~The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the global governmental response, vaccine distribution, and related impact on society and the economy~~Certain prior period balances have resulted in significant uncertainty in the global economy and volatility in financial markets. Given the significant global health, market, employment and economic impacts of COVID-19 and the uncertainty of its duration, the Partnership cannot reliably predict the ultimate impact of COVID-19 on financial markets or its financial results. The financial impacts of COVID-19 were included in the Partnership's estimates for assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as of December 31, 2020.been adjusted to align to current year presentation. The Partnership evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure through March ~~12, 2021,~~11, 2022, which was the date these Consolidated Financial Statements were available to be issued, and identified no matters requiring disclosure.

Partnership Agreement. Under the terms of the Partnership’s ~~Twentieth~~Twenty-First Amended and Restated Agreement of Registered Limited Liability Limited Partnership, dated ~~August 6, 2018,~~September 1, 2021, (the “Partnership Agreement”), a partner’s capital is required to be redeemed by the Partnership in the event of the partner’s death or withdrawal from the Partnership, subject to compliance with ongoing regulatory capital requirements. In the event of a partner’s death, the Partnership generally redeems the partner’s capital within six ~~months.~~months. The Partnership has restrictions in place which govern the withdrawal of capital. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, limited partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership are ~~to be~~ repaid their capital in ~~three~~3 equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their withdrawal notice is received by the Managing Partner (as defined in the Partnership Agreement). The capital of general partners requesting withdrawal from the Partnership is converted to subordinated limited partnership capital or, at the discretion of the Managing Partner, redeemed by the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners requesting withdrawal are repaid their capital in ~~six~~6 equal annual installments beginning no earlier than 90 days after their request for withdrawal of ~~contributed~~ capital is received by the Managing Partner. The ~~Partnership’s~~ Managing Partner has discretion to waive or modify these withdrawal restrictions and to accelerate the return of capital. All current and future Partnership capital is subordinate to all current and future liabilities of the Partnership. The Partnership Agreement includes additional terms.

5355

PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Revenue Recognition.The Partnership's revenue is recognized based on contracts with clients, mutual fund companies, insurance companies and other product providers. As a full-service brokerage firm, Edward Jones provides clients with custodial services, including safekeeping of client funds, collecting and disbursing funds from a client's account, and providing trade confirmations and account statements. The Partnership does not charge a separate fee for these services. Revenue is generally recognized in the same manner for both the U.S. and Canada segments.

The Partnership classifies its revenue into the following categories:

Asset-based fee revenue – Revenue is derived from fees determined by the underlying value of client assets and includes advisory programs fees, service fees, and other asset-based fee revenue. The primary source of asset-based fee revenue is generated from program fees for investment advisory services provided within the Partnership’s advisory programs, including in the U.S., the Edward Jones Advisory Solutions® program (“Advisory Solutions”) and the Edward Jones Guided Solutions® program ("Guided Solutions") and, in Canada, the Edward Jones Portfolio Program® and the Edward Jones Guided Portfolios® program. Advisory program contracts outline the investment advisory services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a definite end date. Program fees are based on the average daily market value of client assets in the program as well as contractual rates and are charged to clients monthly and collected the following month. The investment advisory services performed in an advisory program contract are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client. As a result, the contract has one performance obligation and program fee revenue is recognized over time as clients simultaneously receive and consume the benefit from the investment advisory services performed by the Partnership.

The Partnership's contracts with mutual fund and insurance companies, along with the prospectuses for mutual funds, allow the Partnership to sell those companies' products to clients (see Trade revenue below for the associated commissions earned from clients) and earn service fees for providing certain distribution and marketing support services for those companies' products held by Edward Jones clients. For mutual funds, those service fees are based on the terms of the mutual fund prospectuses. Service fees are generally based on the average daily market value of client assets held in a company's mutual fund or insurance product. For future service fees the Partnership may earn on existing client assets, market constraints prevent reasonably estimating the transaction price and estimates could result in significant revenue reversals. Thus, service fee revenue is recognized monthly at the time the market constraints have been removed, the transaction price is known and the services have been performed. Other asset-based fee revenue consists of revenue sharing, fund adviser fees, cash solutions and Trust Co. fees. The Partnership has agreements with clients or product providers to earn other asset-based fees for providing services, which generally include providing investment advice or service to clients or mutual funds, or marketing support or other services to product providers. Fees are generally based on asset values held in clients' accounts. The services performed for other asset-based fee contracts are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client. As a result, the contracts have one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit from the services performed by the Partnership. For both service fees and other asset-based fee revenue, revenue is collected monthly or quarterly based on the agreements and the agreements generally do not have a term. Due to the timing of receipt of information, the Partnership uses estimates in recording the accruals related to certain asset-based fees, which are based on historical trends and are adjusted to reflect market conditions for the period covered.

Account and activity fee revenue – Revenue is derived from fees based on the number of accounts or activity and includes shareholder accounting services fees, self-directed individual retirement account ("IRA") fees, and other activity-based fee revenue from clients, mutual fund companies and insurance companies. The Partnership has agreements with mutual fund companies for shareholder accounting services in which the Partnership performs certain transfer agent support services, which may include tracking client holdings, distributing dividends and shareholder information to clients, and responding to client inquiries. Shareholder accounting services fees are based on the number of mutual fund positions held by clients and fees are collected monthly or quarterly based on the agreements, which generally do not have a term. The transfer agent support services performed in a shareholder accounting services contract are a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client. As a result, the contract has one performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time as the mutual fund company simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit from the services performed by the Partnership. The Partnership also earns retirement account fees for providing reporting services pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code and account maintenance

~~PART II~~

~~Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued~~

services. Clients are charged an annual fee per account for these services. Revenue is recognized over a one-year period as the services are provided, which are simultaneously received and consumed by the client.

PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Trade revenue – Revenue is derived from fees based on client transactions and includes commissions and principal transactions. The primary source of trade revenue is from commissions revenue which consists of charges to clients for the ~~purchase or sale~~distribution of mutual fund shares, ~~and~~the purchase or sale of equities and the purchase of insurance products. Principal transactions revenue primarily results from the Partnership’s distribution of and participation in principal trading activities in municipal obligations, over-the-counter corporate obligations, and certificates of deposit. Principal transactions are generally entered into by the Partnership to facilitate a client's buy or sell order for certain fixed income products. Brokerage contracts outline the transaction services to be performed for a client under the contract and do not have a term. The transaction charge to clients varies based on the product and size of the trade. The Partnership's contracts with mutual fund and insurance companies, along with the prospectuses for mutual funds, allow the Partnership to sell those companies' products to clients and earn certain commissions, which for mutual funds, are aligned with the terms of the mutual fund prospectuses. Trade revenue is recognized at a point in time when the transaction is placed, or trade date. On trade date the client obtains control through a right to either own a security for a purchase or receive payment for a sale. Transaction charges are received no later than settlement ~~date.~~date.

Interest and dividends revenue – Interest revenue is earned on client margin ~~(loan)~~loan account balances. In addition, interest revenue is earned on cash and cash equivalents, cash and investments segregated under federal regulations, securities purchased under agreements to resell, ~~and~~ Partnership loans and investment securities, none of which is based on revenue contracts with clients.

Other forms of revenue are recorded on an accrual basis. Activity or transaction-based revenue is recorded at a point in time when the transaction occurs and asset-based revenue is recorded over time as the services are provided.

Foreign Exchange. Assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated at the exchange rate at the end of the period. Revenue and expenses denominated in a foreign currency are translated using the average exchange rate for each period. Foreign exchange gains and losses are included in other revenue on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fair Value. Substantially all of the Partnership’s financial assets and financial liabilities covered under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure (“ASC 820”), are carried at fair value or at contracted amounts which approximate fair value given the short time to maturity.

Fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, also known as the “exit price.” Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. The Partnership’s financial assets and financial liabilities recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820, with the related amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to value these assets and liabilities at fair value for each level, are as follows:

Level I – Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

The types of assets categorized as Level I generally are government and agency obligations, including U.S. treasuries, investments in publicly traded mutual funds and money market funds with quoted market prices, equities listed in active markets, client fractional share ownership assets and ~~government and agency~~client fractional share redemption obligations.

Level II – Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level I) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with related market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life. The Partnership uses the market approach valuation technique which incorporates third-party pricing services and other relevant observable information (such as market interest rates, yield curves, prepayment risk and credit risk generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities) in valuing these types of investments. When third-party pricing services are used, the methods and assumptions used are reviewed by the Partnership.

~~PART II~~

~~Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued~~

The types of assets categorized as Level II generally are certificates of deposit, ~~state and~~ municipal obligations and corporate bonds and notes.

PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Level III – Inputs are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the inputs to the model.

The Partnership did ~~not~~0t have any assets or liabilities categorized as Level III during the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~ 2020.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments with ~~original~~ maturities of three months or less from the purchase date to be cash equivalents.

Cash and Investments Segregated under Federal Regulations. Cash, investments and the related interest receivable are segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

Collateral. The Partnership reports as assets collateral it has pledged in secured borrowings and other arrangements when the secured party cannot sell or repledge the assets or the Partnership can substitute collateral or otherwise redeem it on short notice. The Partnership does not report collateral it has received in secured lending and other arrangements as an asset when the debtor has the right to redeem or substitute the collateral on short notice.

Fractional Shares. Clients may receive fractional share interests through the Partnership's dividend reinvestment and dollar cost averaging programs. The Partnership records these fractional shares, which are considered encumbered assets, at fair value in other assets with associated liabilities in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as the Partnership must fulfill its clients' future fractional share redemptions. The liabilities are initially recorded at the dollar amount received from the clients, but the Partnership makes an election to record the liabilities at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the assets and liabilities offset in other revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income, with no impact on income before allocations to partners. These balances were not previously presented in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, but the Partnership presented an asset and liability of $710 as of December 31, 2021 and adjusted the prior year balance to present an asset and liability of $534 as of December 31, 2020. The revision to the prior year balance had no impact on prior years' income before allocations to partners, operating cash flows, or partnership capital.

Securities Owned. Securities owned, primarily consisting of investment securities, are recorded on a trade-date basis at fair value which is determined by using quoted market or dealer prices. The Partnership's investment securities are primarily held to maintain firm liquidity. The unrealized gains and losses for investment securities are recorded in other revenue in the Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Income. The Partnership records the related unrealized gains and losses for inventory securities in trade revenue in the Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Income.

~~Equipment, Property~~Fixed Assets. Fixed Assets include equipment, property, software and ~~Improvements.~~leasehold improvements. Equipment, including furniture and fixtures, is recorded at cost and depreciated using straight-line and accelerated methods over estimated useful lives of three to ~~ten years.~~seven years. Buildings are depreciated using the straight-line method over their useful lives, which are estimated at thirty years. Software includes purchased software licenses and internally developed software. Internally developed software consists of labor and consulting costs to develop and implement new software or modify existing software to improve functionality for the Partnership's internal use, while costs in other project phases are expensed as incurred. Software is depreciated using the straight-line method over its useful life, which is estimated at three to fiveyears. Leasehold improvementsare amortized based on the term of the lease or the economic useful life of the improvement, whichever is less. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged against income as incurred, whereas significant enhancements are capitalized and depreciated once the asset is placed into service. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the respective category and any related gain or loss is recorded as other revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. ~~The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged against income as incurred, whereas significant enhancements are capitalized and depreciated once the asset is placed into service. Long-lived~~

Fixed assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of the asset may not be fully recoverable. If impairment is indicated, the asset value is written down to its fair value.

PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. The Partnership has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain financial advisors. The Partnership has recorded a liability of ~~$268~~$298 for the future payments due to financial advisors participating in the plan. As the future amounts due to financial advisors change in accordance with plan requirements, the Partnership records the change in future amounts owed to financial advisors as an increase or decrease in accrued compensation in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and compensation and benefits expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Partnership has chosen to economically hedge this future liability by purchasing securities in an amount similar to the future liability expected to be due in accordance with the plan. These securities are included in investment securities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and the unrealized gains and losses are recorded in other revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Each period, the net impact of the change in future amounts owed to financial advisors in the plan and the change in value of the investment securities are approximately the same, resulting in minimal net impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~PART II~~

~~Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued~~

Retirement Transition Plans. The Partnership, in certain circumstances, offers individually tailored retirement transition plans to retiring financial advisors. Each retirement transition plan compensates a retiring financial advisor for successfully providing client transition services in accordance with a retirement and transition agreement. Generally, the retirement and transition agreement is for five ~~years.~~years. During the first two years the retiring financial advisor remains an employee and provides client transition services, which include, but are not limited to, the successful transition of client accounts and assets to successor financial advisors, as well as mentoring and providing training and support to successor financial advisors. The financial advisor retires at the end of year two and is subject to a non-compete agreement for three ~~years.~~years. Most retiring financial advisors participating in a retirement transition plan are paid ratably over four ~~years.~~years. Compensation expense is generally recognized ratably over the two-year transition period which aligns with the service period of most agreements, with compensation expense related to some plans recognized over one year depending on the size and complexity of the transition plan. As of December 31, ~~2020, $109~~2021, $112 was accrued for future payments to financial advisors who have already started a plan, approximately ~~$52~~$55 of which is expected to be paid in ~~2021.~~2022. As of December 31, ~~2019, $102~~2020, $109 was accrued.Successor financial advisors receive reduced compensation on transitioned assets for up to four ~~years.~~ years.

Lease Accounting.The Partnership leases branch office space under numerous operating leases from non-affiliates and financial advisors. Branch offices are generally leased for terms of five years and generally contain a renewal option. Renewal options are not included in the lease term if it is not reasonably certain the Partnership will exercise the renewal option. The Partnership also leases a home office ~~spaces~~space and land from non-affiliates with terms ranging from 12 to 30 ~~years.~~years.

The Partnership recognizes lease liabilities for future lease payments and lease right-of-use assets for the right of use of an underlying asset within a contract. Current leases are all classified as operating leases. Lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized onin the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at commencement date and calculated as the present value of the sum of the remaining fixed lease payments over the lease term. Throughout the lease term, the lease right-of-use asset includes the impact from the timing of lease payments and straight-line rent expense. The Partnership used its incremental borrowing rate based on information available at lease commencement as leases do not contain a readily determinable implicit rate. A single lease cost, or rent expense, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Partnership does not separate lease components (i.e., fixed payments including rent, real estate taxes and insurance costs) from non-lease components (i.e., common-area maintenance) and recognizes them as a single lease component. Variable lease payments not included within lease contracts are expensed as incurred. See Note 32 for additional information.

Income Taxes. Generally, income taxes have not been provided for in the Consolidated Financial Statements due to the partnership tax structure where each partner is liable for ~~his or her~~their own tax payments. For the jurisdictions in which the Partnership is liable for tax payments, the income tax provisions are immaterial (see Note ~~12)~~11).

Partnership Capital Subject to Mandatory Redemption. FASB ASC No. 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”), established standards for classifying and measuring certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. Under the provisions of ASC 480, the obligation to redeem a partner’s capital in the event of a partner’s death is one of the criteria requiring capital to be classified as a liability.

PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Since the Partnership Agreement obligates the Partnership to redeem a partner’s capital after a partner’s death, ASC 480 requires all of the Partnership’s equity capital to be classified as a liability. In accordance with ASC 480, income allocable to limited, subordinated limited and general partners is classified as a reduction of income before allocations to partners, which results in a presentation of $00 net income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018.~~2019. The financial statement presentations required to comply with ASC 480 do not alter the Partnership’s treatment of income, income allocations or capital for any other purposes.

~~PART II~~

~~Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued~~

Net ~~income,~~Income, as defined in the Partnership Agreement, is equivalent to income before allocations to partners on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Such income, if any, for each calendar year is allocated to the Partnership’s ~~three~~3 classes of capital in accordance with the formulas prescribed in the Partnership Agreement. Income allocations are based upon partner capital contributions including capital contributions financed with loans from the Partnership. First, limited partners are allocated ~~net income (as defined in the Partnership Agreement)~~Net Income in accordance with the prescribed formula for their share of net income. Limited partners generally do not share in the ~~net loss~~Net Loss, as defined in the Partnership agreement, in any year in which there is a net loss and the Partnership is not dissolved or liquidated. Thereafter, subordinated limited partners and general partners are allocated any remaining ~~net income~~Net Income or ~~net loss~~Net Loss based on formulas as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

The limited partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is held by current and former associates and general partners of the Partnership. Limited partners participate in the Partnership’s profits and are paid a minimum ~~7.5%~~7.5% annual return on the face amount of their capital (see Note ~~10)~~9) in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.

The subordinated limited partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is held by current and former general partners of the Partnership. Subordinated limited partners receive a percentage of the Partnership’s ~~net income~~Net Income determined in accordance with the Partnership Agreement. The subordinated limited partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is subordinated to the limited partnership capital.

The general partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is held by current general partners of the Partnership. General partners receive a percentage of the Partnership’s ~~net income~~Net Income determined in accordance with the Partnership Agreement. The general partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption is subordinated to the limited partnership capital and the subordinated limited partnership capital.

~~Advertising.~~ ~~Advertising activities include the cost to produce and distribute campaigns market wide to attract and retain clients and financial advisors. Such costs are generally expensed when incurred.~~

~~Recently Adopted Accounting Standards.~~

~~In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-13,~~ ~~Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) – Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments~~ (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 replaces the “incurred loss” credit losses framework with a new accounting standard that requires management's measurement of the allowance for credit losses to be based on a broader range of reasonable and supportable information for lifetime credit loss estimates. Effective January 1, 2020, the Partnership adopted the standard with an immaterial expected credit loss and no adjustment to the opening balance of Partnership capital. See Note 2 for additional information.

~~In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15,~~ ~~Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (~~"ASU 2018-15"). ASU 2018-15 aligns the capitalization requirements for implementation costs for cloud computing arrangement service contracts (including those without a software license) with the current guidance for internal-use software licenses. Companies could elect to adopt the standard either prospectively or retrospectively. The Partnership adopted the standard on January 1, 2020 on a prospective basis without a material impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~NOTE 2 –~~ Current Expected Credit Losses

. The Partnership individually assessed the current expected credit loss for the assets ~~in scope of ASU 2016-13~~ below.

Receivables from Clients

Receivables from clients is primarily composed of margin loan balances. The value of securities owned by clients and held as collateral for these receivables is not reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Collateral held as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~January 1,~~ 2020 was ~~$4,035~~$4,803 and ~~$3,915,~~$4,035, respectively, and was not repledged or sold. The Partnership considers these financing receivables to be of good credit quality due to the fact that these receivables are primarily collateralized by the related client investments.

PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

To estimate expected credit losses on margin loans, the Partnership applied the collateral maintenance practical expedient by comparing the amortized cost basis of the margin loans with the fair value of collateral at the reporting date. Margin loans are limited to a fraction of the total value of the securities held in the client's account against those loans upon issuance in accordance with Federal Reserve Board Regulation T and throughout the life of the loan in accordance with Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Rule 4210. In the event of a decline in the market value of the securities in a margin account, the Partnership requires the client to deposit additional securities or cash (or to sell a sufficient amount of securities) so that, at all times, the loan to the client is no greater than 65% of the value of the securities in the account, which is a more stringent requirement than FINRA Rule 4210. As such, the Partnership reasonably expects that the borrower will be able to continually replenish collateral securing the financial asset and does not expect the fair value of collateral to fall below the value of margin loans and, as a result, the Partnership considers credit risk related to these receivables to be minimal. The fair value of collateral was higher than the amortized cost basis for virtually all margin loans as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the expected credit loss for those loans was 0 for each period. In limited circumstances, a margin loan may become undercollateralized. When this occurs, the Partnership records a reserve for the undercollateralized portion of the loan, which was an immaterial amount as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell

The Partnership participates in short-term resale agreements collateralized by government and agency securities. These transactions are reported as collateralized financing and are carried at contractual cost with accrued interest in receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies and other within the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The fair value of the underlying collateral, plus accrued interest, must equal or exceed 102% of the carrying amount of the transaction in U.S. agreements and must equal or exceed 100% of the carrying amount of the transaction in Canada agreements. In the event that the fair value of the collateral does not meet the contractual minimums, the counterparty is obligated to meet any shortfall promptly. It is the Partnership’s policy to have such underlying resale agreement collateral delivered to the Partnership or deposited in its accounts at its custodian banks. The fair value of the collateral related to these agreements was $1,526 and $1,743 as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and was not repledged or sold.

To estimate expected credit losses on the resale agreements, the Partnership applied the collateral maintenance practical expedient by comparing the amortized cost basis of the resale agreements with the fair value of collateral at the reporting date. The counterparties are all financial institutions that the Partnership considers to be reputable and reliable, and the Partnership reasonably expects the counterparties will be able to continually replenish collateral securing the financial asset and does not expect the fair value of collateral to fall below the value of the resale agreements frequently or for an extended period of time. The expected credit loss was 0 for each period.

Partnership Loans

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions as discussed in more detail in Note 9. General partners and subordinated limited partners must repay any amount of principal and interest outstanding on their Partnership loans prior to receiving a return of their Partnership capital. The loan value never exceeds the value of capital allocated to the partner, and there has been 0 historical loss on Partnership loans. As such, the risk of loss is remote, and the expected credit loss was 0 as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Receivables from Revenue Contracts with Customers

The majority of the Partnership's receivables are collateralized financial assets, including advisory program fees, retirement fees, mutual fund and insurance service fees, and fund advisor fees, because the fees are paid out of client accounts or third-party products consisting of cash and securities. Due to the size of the fees in relation to the value of the cash and securities in accounts or funds, the collateral value always exceeds the amortized cost basis of the receivables, resulting in a remote risk of loss. In addition, the receivables have a short duration, generally due within 30 to 90 days, and there is no historical evidence of market declines that would cause the fair value of the underlying collateral to decline below the amortized cost of the receivables. The Partnership considered current conditions, and there is not a foreseeable expectation of an event or change which would result in the receivables being undercollateralized or unpaid. The expected credit loss for receivables from revenue contracts with customers was 0 as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

To estimate expected credit losses on margin loans, the Partnership applied the collateral maintenance practical expedient by comparing the amortized cost basis of the margin loans with the fair value of collateral at the reporting date. Margin loans are limited to a fraction of the total value of the securities held in the client's account against those loans upon issuance in accordance with Federal Reserve Board Regulation T and throughout the life of the loan ~~in accordance with Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Rule 4210.~~ ~~In the event of a decline in the market value of the securities in a margin account,~~ the Partnership requires the client to deposit additional securities or cash (or to sell a sufficient amount of securities) so that, at all times, the loan to the client is no greater than 65% of the value of the securities in the account, which is a more stringent requirement than FINRA Rule 4210. As such, the Partnership reasonably expects that the borrower will be able to continually replenish collateral securing the financial asset and does not expect the fair value of collateral to fall below the value of margin loans and, as a result, the Partnership considers credit risk related to these receivables to be minimal. The fair value of collateral was higher than the amortized cost basis for virtually all margin loans as of December 31, 2020 and January 1, 2020, and the expected credit loss for those loans was zero for each period. In limited circumstances, a margin loan may become undercollateralized. When this occurs, the Partnership records a reserve for the undercollateralized portion of the loan, which was an immaterial amount as of December 31, 2020 and January 1, 2020.

The Partnership participates in short-term resale agreements collateralized by government and agency securities. These transactions are reported as collateralized financing and are carried at cost with accrued interest in receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies and other within the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The fair value of the underlying collateral, plus accrued interest, must equal or exceed 102% of the carrying amount of the transaction in U.S. agreements and must equal or exceed 100% of the carrying amount of the transaction in Canada agreements. It is the Partnership’s policy to have such underlying resale agreement collateral delivered to the Partnership or deposited in its accounts at its custodian banks. The fair value of the collateral related to these agreements was $1,743 and $1,724 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and was not repledged or sold.

To estimate expected credit losses on the resale agreements, the Partnership applied the collateral maintenance practical expedient by comparing the amortized cost basis of the resale agreements with the fair value of collateral at the reporting date. The counterparties are all financial institutions that the Partnership considers to be reputable and reliable, and the Partnership reasonably expects the counterparties will be able to continually replenish collateral securing the financial asset and does not expect the fair value of collateral to fall below the value of the resale agreements. The fair value of collateral, plus accrued interest, was 102% of the related assets in U.S. agreements and 100% in Canada agreements as of December 31, 2020 and January 1, 2020, and the expected credit loss was zero for each period.

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions as discussed in more detail in Note 10. General partners and subordinated limited partners must repay any amount of principal and interest outstanding on their Partnership loans prior to receiving a return of their Partnership capital. The loan value never exceeds the value of capital allocated to the partner, and there has been no historical loss on Partnership loans. As such, the risk of loss is remote, and the expected credit loss was zero as of December 31, 2020 and January 1, 2020.

~~expected credit loss for receivables from revenue contracts with customers was zero as of December 31, 2020 and January 1, 2020.~~

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $306 and $283, respectively, and lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities was $328 and $360, respectively. The weighted-average remaining lease term was four years as of both December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the weighted-average discount rate was 2.6% and 3.2%, respectively.

~~The Partnership adopted ASC 842,~~ ~~Leases~~, effective January 1, 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, operating lease cost was $304 and $280, respectively, and variable lease cost not included in the lease liability was $57 and $55, respectively. Total lease cost for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $360 and $335, respectively. ~~Under ASC 840, Leases,~~ ~~the predecessor to ASC 842, rent and other lease-related expenses were $305 for the year ended December 31, 2018.~~ ~~The Partnership's future undiscounted cash outflows for operating leases are summarized below as of:~~

~~While the rights and obligations for leases that have not yet commenced are not significant, the Partnership regularly enters into new branch office leases.~~

~~As of December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, $563, $470 and $377, respectively, of the receivable from clients balance related to revenue contracts with customers.~~

The Partnership derived 13%, 14% and 14% of its total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, from one mutual fund company. The revenue generated from this company relates to business conducted with the Partnership’s U.S. segment.

~~The following tables show the Partnership's disaggregated revenue information for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018:~~

Payable to clients is composed of cash amounts held by the Partnership due to clients. Substantially all amounts payable to clients are subject to withdrawal upon client request. The Partnership pays interest, which was ~~0.01%~~0.01% as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and 0.35% as of December 31, 2019, on the vast majority of credit balances in client accounts. The total interest paid to clients for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 was $2, $9and ~~2018 was $9, $62 and $58,~~$62, respectively.

NOTE 6 – ~~RECEIVABLE FROM MUTUAL FUNDS, INSURANCE COMPANIES AND OTHER~~FAIR VALUE

The following ~~table shows~~tables show the Partnership's ~~receivable from mutual funds, insurance companies~~financial assets and ~~other as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:~~liabilities measured at fair value:

2020

2019

Deposit for Canadian retirement accounts

$
457

$
326

Fees from mutual funds and insurance companies

285

291

Other receivables

76

44

Total

$
818

$
661


	Fair Value as of
	December 31, 2021
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Certificates of deposit	$	0	$	266	$	—	$	266
Money market funds		47		0		—		47
Total cash equivalents	$	47	$	266	$	—	$	313

Investments segregated under federal regulations:
U.S. treasuries	$	13,908	$	0	$	—	$	13,908
Certificates of deposit		0		400		—		400
Total investments segregated under federal regulations	$	13,908	$	400	$	—	$	14,308

Securities owned:
Investment securities:
Government and agency obligations	$	413	$	0	$	—	$	413
Mutual funds(1)		366		0		—		366
Equities		3		0		—		3
Certificates of deposit		0		70		—		70
Total investment securities	$	782	$	70	$	—	$	852

Inventory securities:
Equities	$	18	$	0	$	—	$	18
Municipal obligations		0		9		—		9
Certificates of deposit		0		6		—		6
Corporate bonds and notes		0		3		—		3
Mutual funds		2		0		—		2
Total inventory securities	$	20	$	18	$	—	$	38

Other assets:
Client fractional share ownership assets	$	710	$	0	$	—	$	710

Liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other:
Client fractional share redemption obligations	$	710	$	0	$	—	$	710

~~The deposit for Canadian retirement accounts is required by Canadian regulations. The Partnership is required to hold deposits with a trustee for clients’ retirement funds held in Canada.~~

~~The receivable from mutual funds and insurance companies is related to revenue contracts with customers. The balance was $278 as of December 31, 2018.~~

6265

PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued


	Fair Value as of
	December 31, 2020
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Certificates of deposit	$	0	$	120	$	—	$	120
Money market funds		41		0		—		41
Total cash equivalents	$	41	$	120	$	—	$	161

Investments segregated under federal regulations:
U.S. treasuries	$	12,068	$	0	$	—	$	12,068
Certificates of deposit		0		100		—		100
Total investments segregated under federal regulations	$	12,068	$	100	$	—	$	12,168

Securities owned:
Investment securities:
Government and agency obligations	$	971	$	0	$	—	$	971
Mutual funds(1)		327		0		—		327
Equities		3		0		—		3
Certificates of deposit		0		1		—		1
Total investment securities	$	1,301	$	1	$	—	$	1,302

Inventory securities:
Equities	$	19	$	0	$	—	$	19
Municipal obligations		0		10		—		10
Corporate bonds and notes		0		2		—		2
Mutual funds		1		0		—		1
Total inventory securities	$	20	$	12	$	—	$	32

Other assets:
Client fractional share ownership assets	$	534	$	0	$	—	$	534

Liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other:
Client fractional share redemption obligations	$	534	$	0	$	—	$	534

(1)

The mutual funds balance consists primarily of securities held to economically hedge future liabilities related to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The balance also includes a security held for regulatory purposes at the Trust Co.

NOTE 7 – ~~FAIR VALUE~~FIXED ASSETS

The following ~~tables show the Partnership's financial instruments measured at fair value:~~table shows fixed assets as of December 31:

Financial Assets at Fair Value as of

December 31, 2020

Level I

Level II

Level III

Total

Cash equivalents:

Certificates of deposit

$
—

$
120

$
—

$
120

Money market funds

41

—

—

41

Total cash equivalents

$
41

$
120

$
—

$
161

Investments segregated under federal regulations:

U.S. treasuries

$
12,051

$
—

$
—

$
12,051

Certificates of deposit

—

100

—

100

Total investments segregated under federal regulations

$
12,051

$
100

$
—

$
12,151

Securities owned:

Investment securities:

Government and agency obligations

$
971

$
—

$
—

$
971

Mutual funds⁽¹⁾

327

—

—

327

Equities

3

—

—

3

Certificates of deposit

—

1

—

1

Total investment securities

$
1,301

$
1

$
—

$
1,302

Inventory securities:

Equities

$
19

$
—

$
—

$
19

State and municipal obligations

—

10

—

10

Corporate bonds and notes

—

2

—

2

Mutual funds

1

—

—

1

Total inventory securities

$
20

$
12

$
—

$
32


	2021		2020
Buildings and improvements	$	1,115	$	1,050
Equipment, furniture and fixtures		598		569
Software		295		194
Land		47		43
Fixed assets, at cost		2,055		1,856
Less: accumulated depreciation		1,192		1,110
Less: accumulated software amortization		138		126
Fixed assets, net	$	725	$	620

PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Financial Assets at Fair Value as of

December 31, 2019

Level I

Level II

Level III

Total

Cash equivalents:

Certificates of deposit

$
—

$
326

$
—

$
326

Investments segregated under federal regulations:

U.S. treasuries

$
3,394

$
—

$
—

$
3,394

Securities owned:

Investment securities:

Mutual funds⁽¹⁾

$
328

$
—

$
—

$
328

Government and agency obligations

3

—

—

3

Equities

1

—

—

1

Total investment securities

$
332

$
—

$
—

$
332

Inventory securities:

Equities

$
18

$
—

$
—

$
18

State and municipal obligations

—

18

—

18

Certificates of deposit

—

9

—

9

Corporate bonds and notes

—

3

—

3

Mutual funds

2

—

—

2

Total inventory securities

$
20

$
30

$
—

$
50

⁽¹⁾	The mutual funds balance consists primarily of securities held to economically hedge future liabilities related to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The balance also includes a security held for regulatory purposes at the Trust Co.

~~NOTE 8 – EQUIPMENT, PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS~~

~~The following table shows~~Depreciation expense on equipment, ~~property~~property and improvements as of ~~December 31, 2020~~$113, $116 and ~~2019:~~

2020

2019

Buildings and improvements

$
1,050

$
1,012

Equipment, furniture and fixtures

763

713

Land

43

43

Equipment, property and improvements, at cost

1,856

1,768

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

1,236

1,152

Equipment, property and improvements, net

$
620

$
616

~~Depreciation~~$107 and amortization expense on ~~equipment, property~~software of $16, $9 and ~~improvements of $125, $115 and $94~~$8 is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income within the occupancy and equipment and communications and data processing line items for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

The Partnership's weighted average amortization period for software was five years as of December 31, 2021 and ~~2018, respectively.~~2020.

The following table shows the expected future amortization of software, excluding $56 of capitalized software costs not yet placed in service that will be amortized in future periods as of December 31:


	2021
2022	$	25
2023		24
2024		23
2025		20
2026		9
Total	$	101

The Partnership's capital expenditures were ~~$129, $176~~$234, $129 and ~~$105~~$176 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The capital expenditures in ~~2020~~2021 were primarily related to software and other technology, real estate and facilities improvements in branch ~~offices, as well as for software and other technology support.~~offices.

~~PART II~~

~~Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued~~

NOTE 98 – LINES OF CREDIT

The following table shows the composition of the Partnership's aggregate bank lines of credit in place as of December ~~31, 2020 and 2019:~~31:


	2020		2019		2021		2020
2018 Credit Facility	$	500	$	500	$	500	$	500
Uncommitted secured credit facilities		390		290		390		390
Total bank lines of credit	$	890	$	790	$	890	$	890

In accordance with the terms of the Partnership's ~~$500~~$500 committed revolving line of credit (the "2018 Credit Facility") entered into in September 2018, the Partnership is required to maintain a leverage ratio of no more than ~~35%~~35% and minimum Partnership capital, net of reserve for anticipated withdrawals and Partnership loans, of at least ~~$1,884.~~$1,884. In addition, Edward Jones is required to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of at least ~~$1,344~~$1,344 and minimum regulatory net capital of at least 6%6% of aggregate debit items as calculated under the alternative method. The Partnership has the ability to draw on various types of loans. The associated interest rate depends on the type of loan, duration of the loan, whether the loan is secured or unsecured and the amount of leverage. Contractual rates are based on an index rate plus the applicable ~~rate.~~spread. The 2018 Credit Facility is intended to provide short-term liquidity to the Partnership should the need arise. As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Partnership was in compliance with all covenants related to the 2018 Credit Facility.

In addition, the Partnership has multiple uncommitted secured lines of credit totaling ~~$390~~$390 that are subject to change at the discretion of the banks. The Partnership also has an additional uncommitted line of credit where the amount and the associated collateral requirements are at the bank's discretion in the event of a borrowing. Based on credit market conditions and the uncommitted nature of these credit facilities, it is possible that these lines of credit could decrease or not be available in the future. Actual borrowing capacity on secured lines is based on availability of client margin securities or firm-owned securities, which would serve as collateral on loans in the event the Partnership borrowed against these lines.

There were no0 amounts outstanding on the 2018 Credit Facility or the uncommitted lines of credit as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020. The Partnership did ~~not~~0t have any draws against these lines of credit during the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, except for periodically testing draw procedures.

067

PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 9 – PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the Enterprise Leadership Team ("ELT"), as defined in the Partnership Agreement) who require financing for some or all of their Partnership capital contributions. In limited circumstances, a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while he or she still has an outstanding Partnership loan. It is anticipated that, of the future general and subordinated limited partnership capital contributions (in each case, other than for ELT members) requiring financing, the majority will be financed through Partnership loans. Loans made by the Partnership to such partners are generally for a period of one year but are expected to be renewed and bear interest at the greater of the Prime Rate for the last business day of the prior fiscal month or 3.25% per annum. The Partnership recognizes interest income for the interest earned related to these loans. The outstanding amount of Partnership loans is reflected as a reduction to total Partnership capital. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the outstanding amount of Partnership loans was $321 and $341, respectively. Interest income earned from these loans, which is included in interest and dividends in the Consolidated Statements of Income, was $13, $14 and $21 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.

The following table shows the roll forward of outstanding Partnership loans for the years ended December 31:


	2021			2020
Partnership loans outstanding at beginning of year	$	341		$	360
Partnership loans issued during the year		222			163
Repayment of Partnership loans during the year		(242	)		(182	)
Total Partnership loans outstanding	$	321		$	341

The minimum 7.5% annual return on the face amount of limited partnership capital was $92, $93 and $94 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. These amounts are included as a component of interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January 12, 2018, to register $450 units of limited partnership interest ("Interests") issuable pursuant to the Partnership's 2018 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2018 Plan"). The Partnership issued approximately $380, $1, $5, and $4 of Interests under the 2018 Plan in 2019, 2020, 2021, and early 2022 respectively. The Partnership plans to terminate the 2018 Plan in 2022 and deregister all remaining unsold Interests under the 2018 Plan. Before the 2018 Plan is terminated, the Partnership may issue the remaining $60 of Interests under that plan at the discretion of the Managing Partner. The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on December 8, 2021, to register an additional $700 of Interests issuable pursuant to the Partnership's 2021 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2021 Plan"). Proceeds from the offering under the 2021 Plan are expected to be used to meet growth needs or for other purposes.

NOTE 10 – ~~PARTNERSHIP~~NET CAPITAL ~~SUBJECT TO MANDATORY REDEMPTION~~REQUIREMENTS

0~~The Partnership makes loans available~~As a result of its activities as a U.S. broker-dealer, Edward Jones is subject to ~~those general partners and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members~~the net capital provisions of Rule 15c3-1 of the ~~Executive Committee) who require financing for some or all of their Partnership~~Exchange Act and capital contributions. In limited circumstances a general partner may withdraw from the Partnership and become a subordinated limited partner while he or she still has an outstanding Partnership loan. It is anticipated that,compliance rules of the ~~future general and subordinated limited~~FINRA Rule 4110. Under the alternative method permitted by the rules, Edward Jones must maintain minimum net capital equal to the greater of $0.25 or 2% of aggregate debit items arising from client transactions. The net capital rules also provide that Edward Jones’ partnership capital ~~contributions (in each case, other~~may not be withdrawn if resulting net capital would be less than ~~for Executive Committee members) requiring financing,~~minimum requirements. Additionally, certain withdrawals require the ~~majority will~~approval of the SEC and FINRA to the extent they exceed defined levels, even though such withdrawals would not cause net capital to be ~~financed through Partnership loans. Loans made~~less than minimum requirements.

EJ Canada is a registered broker-dealer regulated by the ~~Partnership~~Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (“IIROC”). Under the regulations prescribed by IIROC, EJ Canada is required to ~~such partners~~maintain minimum levels of risk-adjusted capital, which are ~~generally for a period~~dependent on the nature of ~~one year but are expected to be renewed~~EJ Canada's assets and bear interest at the interest rate defined in the loan documents. The Partnership recognizes interest income for the interest earned related to these loans. The outstanding amount of Partnership loans is reflected as a reduction to total Partnership capital. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the outstanding amount of Partnership loans was $341 and $360, respectively. Interest income earned from these loans, which is included in interest and dividends in the Consolidated Statements of Income, was $14, $21 and $17 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.operations.

6568

PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

The following table shows the ~~roll forward of outstanding Partnership loans for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:~~

2020

2019

Partnership loans outstanding at beginning of year

$
360

$
332

Partnership loans issued during the year

163

164

Repayment of Partnership loans during the year

(182
)

(136
)
Total Partnership loans outstanding

$
341

$
360

The minimum 7.5% annual return on the face amount of limited partnership capital was $93, $94 and $67 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These amounts are included as a component of interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Partnership filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on January 12, 2018, to register $450 of Interests issuable pursuant to the Partnership's 2018 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan (the "2018 Plan"). The Partnership issued approximately $380, $1 and $3 million of Interests under the 2018 Plan in early 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The remaining $66 of Interests may be issued under the Plan at the discretion of the Managing Partner in the future.

~~NOTE 11 – NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS~~

As a result of its activities as a U.S. broker-dealer, Edward Jones is subject to the net capital provisions of Rule 15c3-1 of the Exchange Act and capital compliance rules of the FINRA Rule 4110. Under the alternative method permitted by the rules, Edward Jones must maintain minimum net capital equal to the greater of $0.25 or 2% of aggregate debit items arising from client transactions. The net capital rules also provide that Edward Jones’ partnership capital may not be withdrawn if resulting net capital would be less than minimum requirements. Additionally, certain withdrawals require the approval of the SEC and FINRA to the extent they exceed defined levels, even though such withdrawals would not cause net capital to be less than minimum requirements.

The Partnership’s Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is a registered broker-dealer regulated by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (“IIROC”). Under the regulations prescribed by IIROC, the Partnership's Canada broker-dealer subsidiary is required to maintain minimum levels of risk-adjusted capital, which are dependent on the nature of the Partnership's Canada broker-dealer subsidiary’s assets and operations.

~~The following table shows the Partnership’s~~ capital figures for its U.S. and Canada ~~broker-dealer subsidiaries~~broker-dealers as of December ~~31, 2020 and 2019:~~31:


	2020			2019			2021			2020
U.S.:
Net capital	$	1,306		$	1,244		$	1,421		$	1,306
Net capital in excess of the minimum required	$	1,248		$	1,188		$	1,352		$	1,248
Net capital as a percentage of aggregate debit items		45.0	%		44.2	%		41.3	%		45.0	%
Net capital after anticipated capital withdrawals, as a percentage of aggregate debit items		23.1	%		26.4	%		20.7	%		23.1	%

Canada:
Regulatory risk-adjusted capital	$	56		$	40		$	71		$	56
Regulatory risk-adjusted capital in excess of the minimum required to be held by IIROC	$	47		$	38		$	50		$	47

U.S. net capital, Canada regulatory risk-adjusted capital and the related capital percentages may fluctuate on a daily basis. ~~In addition, Trust Co. was~~

NOTE 11 – INCOME TAXES

The Partnership is a pass-through entity for federal and state income tax purposes and generally does not incur income taxes. Instead, its earnings and losses are included in ~~compliance with~~the income tax returns of the general, subordinated limited and limited partners. However, the Partnership's structure does include certain subsidiaries which are corporations that are subject to income tax. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Partnership's tax basis of net assets and liabilities exceeds the book basis by $168 and $278, respectively. The primary difference between financial statement basis and tax basis is related to the deferral for tax purposes in deducting accrued expenses until they are paid. Since the Partnership is treated as a pass-through entity for federal and state income tax purposes, the difference between the tax basis and the book basis of assets and liabilities will impact the future tax liabilities of the partners. The tax differences will not impact the net income of the Partnership.

FASB ASC No. 740, Income Taxes, requires the Partnership to determine whether, upon review by the applicable taxing authority, each of its ~~regulatory capital requirements.~~income tax positions has a likelihood of being realized that is greater than fifty percent, which could result in the Partnership recording a tax liability that would reduce Partnership capital. The Partnership did 0t have any significant uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and is not aware of any tax positions that will significantly change during the next twelve months. The Partnership and its subsidiaries are generally subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and by various state and foreign taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Partnership and its subsidiaries conduct business. Tax years prior to 2018 are generally no longer subject to examination by the IRS, state, local or foreign tax authorities.

NOTE 12 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Partnership maintains a profit sharing and 401(k) plan covering all eligible U.S. employees, general partners and service partners, a Group Registered Retirement Savings Plan covering all eligible EJ Canada employees and general partners, and a Deferred Profit Sharing Plan covering all eligible EJ Canada employees. The Partnership contributed approximately $286, $249 and $213 in total to these plans in early 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019.

The Partnership contributed approximately $39, $36 and $32 to the profit sharing plan in early 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, applying mandatory profit sharing contributions that were withheld from service partners during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.

PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND RISKS

~~NOTE 12 – INCOME TAXES~~

The Partnership is a pass-through entity for federal and state income tax purposes and generally does not incur income taxes. Instead, its earnings and losses are included in the income tax returns of the general, subordinated limited and limited partners. However, the Partnership's structure does include certain subsidiaries which are corporations that are subject to income tax. As of December 31, ~~2020 and 2019,~~2021, the Partnership would be subject to termination fees of approximately $483 in the event the Partnership terminated existing contractual commitments with certain vendors providing ongoing services primarily for information technology to support the Partnership's ~~tax basis~~strategic initiatives, in addition to services for operations and marketing. As of ~~net assets~~December 31, 2021, the Partnership made no such decision to terminate these services. These termination fees will decrease over the related contract periods, which generally expire within the next three years.

As of December 31, 2021, the Partnership has a revolving line of credit available (see Note 8).

The Partnership provides margin loans to its clients in accordance with Federal Reserve Board Regulation T and ~~liabilities exceeds~~FINRA Rule 4210, under which loans are collateralized by securities in client accounts. The Partnership monitors required margin levels and requires clients to deposit additional collateral or reduce positions to meet minimum collateral requirements (see Note 1).

The Partnership's securities activities involve execution, settlement and financing of various securities transactions for clients. The Partnership may be exposed to risk of loss in the ~~book basis by $278~~event clients, other brokers and ~~$303, respectively.~~dealers, banks, depositories or clearing organizations are unable to fulfill contractual obligations. The ~~primary difference between financial statement basis~~Partnership has controls in place to ensure client activity is monitored and ~~tax basis is related~~to mitigate the risk of clients' inability to meet their obligations to the ~~deferral~~Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership considers its potential to make payments under these client transactions to be remote and accordingly, no liability has been recognized for ~~tax purposes~~these transactions.

Cash balances held at various major U.S. financial institutions, which typically exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance coverage limits, subject the Partnership to a concentration of credit risk. Additionally, EJ Canada may also have cash deposits in ~~deducting accrued expenses until they~~excess of the applicable insured amounts. The Partnership regularly monitors the credit ratings of these financial institutions in order to help mitigate the credit risk that exists with the deposits in excess of insured amounts. The Partnership has credit exposure to government and agency securities which are ~~paid. Since~~held as collateral for its resell agreements, investment securities and segregated investments. The Partnership's primary exposure on resell agreements is with the counterparty and the Partnership would only have exposure to government and agency credit risk in the event of the counterparty's default on the resell agreements (see Note 1).

The Partnership provides guarantees to securities clearing houses and exchanges under their standard membership agreements, which require a member to guarantee the performance of other members. Under these agreements, if a member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearing houses and exchanges, all other members would be required to meet any shortfall. The Partnership's liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable and may exceed the cash and securities it has posted as collateral. However, the Partnership considers the likelihood that the Partnership will be required to make payments under these agreements to be remote. Accordingly, no liability has been recognized for these transactions.

NOTE 14 – CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of its business, the Partnership is ~~treated~~involved, from time to time, in various legal and regulatory matters, including arbitrations, class actions, other litigation, and examinations, investigations and proceedings by governmental authorities, self-regulatory organizations and other regulators, which may result in losses. These matters include:

Wage-and-Hour Class Action. On March 13, 2018, JFC and Edward Jones were named as defendants in a ~~pass-through entity~~purported collective and class action lawsuit (Bland, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P, et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for ~~federal~~the Northern District of Illinois by four former financial advisors. The lawsuit was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) as well as Missouri and ~~state income tax purposes,~~Illinois law and alleges that the ~~difference between~~defendants unlawfully attempted torecoup training costs from departing financial advisors and failed to pay all overtime owed to financial advisor trainees among other claims. The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory and liquidated damages. On March 19, 2019, the ~~tax basis~~court entered an order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss all claims, but permitting the plaintiffs to amend and re-file certain of their claims. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on May 3, 2019. On March 30, 2020, the ~~book basis of assets~~court partially granted the defendants' renewed motion to dismiss the amended complaint and ~~liabilities will impact the future tax liabilities~~dismissed seven of the ~~partners.~~ten causes of action it purported to state. The ~~tax differences will not impact~~court's order eliminated from the ~~net income of~~case any claims that rely upon the ~~Partnership.~~firm's contractual right to recoup training

~~FASB ASC No. 740,~~ ~~Income Taxes,~~ requires the Partnership to determine whether, upon review by the applicable taxing authority, each of its income tax positions has a likelihood of being realized that is greater than fifty percent, which could result in the Partnership recording a tax liability that would reduce Partnership capital. The Partnership did not have any significant uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and is not aware of any tax positions that will significantly change during the next twelve months. The Partnership and its subsidiaries are generally subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and by various state and foreign taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Partnership and its subsidiaries conduct business. Tax years prior to 2017 are generally no longer subject to examination by the IRS, state, local or foreign tax authorities.

~~NOTE 13 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS~~70

The Partnership maintains a profit sharing and 401(k) plan covering all eligible U.S. employees, general partners and service partners, a Group Registered Retirement Savings Plan covering all eligible Canada employees and general partners, and a Deferred Profit Sharing Plan covering all eligible Canada employees. The Partnership contributed approximately $249, $213 and $197 in total to these plans for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.PART II

The Partnership contributed approximately $36 and $32 to the profit sharing plan in early 2021 and 2020, respectively, applying mandatory profit sharing contributions that were withheld from service partners during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

~~NOTE 14 – COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND RISKS~~

As of December 31, 2020, the Partnership would be subject to termination fees of approximately $103 in the event the Partnership terminated existing contractual commitments with certain vendors providing ongoing services primarily for information technology, operations and marketing. As of December 31, 2020, the Partnership made no such decision to terminate these services. These termination fees will decrease over the related contract periods, which generally expire within the next three years.

~~As of December 31, 2020, the Partnership also has a revolving line of credit available (see Note 9).~~

The Partnership provides margin loans to its clients in accordance with Federal Reserve Board Regulation T and FINRA Rule 4210, under which loans are collateralized by securities in client accounts. The Partnership monitors required margin levels and requires clients to deposit additional collateral or reduce positions to meet minimum collateral requirements (see Note 2).

The Partnership's securities activities involve execution, settlement and financing of various securities transactions for clients. The Partnership may be exposed to risk of loss in the event clients, other brokers and dealers, banks, depositories or clearing organizations are unable to fulfill contractual obligations. The Partnership has controls in place to ensure client activity is monitored and to mitigate the risk of clients' inability to meet their obligations to the Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership considers its potential to make payments under these client transactions to be remote and accordingly, no liability has been recognized for these transactions.

~~PART II~~

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

Cash balances held at various major U.S. financial institutions, which typically exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance coverage limits, subject the Partnership to a concentration of credit risk. Additionally, the Partnership's Canada broker-dealer subsidiary may also have cash deposits in excess of the applicable insured amounts. The Partnership regularly monitors the credit ratings of these financial institutions in order to help mitigate the credit risk that exists with the deposits in excess of insured amounts. The Partnership has credit exposure to U.S. government and agency securities which are held as collateral for its resell agreements, investment securities and segregated investments. The Partnership's primary exposure on resell agreements is with the counterparty and the Partnership would only have exposure to U.S. government and agency credit risk in the event of the counterparty's default on the resell agreements (see Note 2).

~~NOTE 15 – CONTINGENCIES~~

In the normal course of its business, the Partnership is involved, from time to time, in various legal and regulatory matters, including arbitrations, class actions, other litigation, and examinations, investigations and proceedings by governmental authorities, self-regulatory organizations and other regulators, which may result in losses. These matters include:

~~Retirement Plan Litigation. On August 19, 2016, JFC, Edward Jones and certain other defendants were named in a putative class action lawsuit (McDonald v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.~~) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, by a participant in the Edward D. Jones & Co. Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan (the "Retirement Plan"). The lawsuit alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Retirement Plan participants and seeks declaratory and equitable relief and monetary damages on behalf of the Retirement Plan. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the ~~McDonald~~ ~~lawsuit which was granted in part dismissing the claim against JFC and denied in part as to all other defendants on January 26, 2017.~~

~~On November 11, 2016, a substantially similar lawsuit (Schultz, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) was filed in the same court. The plaintiffs consolidated the two lawsuits by adding the~~ ~~Schultz~~ ~~plaintiffs to the~~ ~~McDonald~~ ~~case, and the~~ ~~Schultz~~ action was dismissed. The plaintiffs filed their first amended consolidated complaint on April 28, 2017. On December 13, 2018, the court entered a preliminary order approving a class action settlement agreement reached among the parties. Following a fairness hearing held on April 18, 2019, the court entered judgment on April 22, 2019 in which it granted final approval of the settlement, effected a full release of claims by the settlement class in favor of the defendants, and dismissed the consolidated lawsuit with prejudice. On June 14, 2019, the lone objector filed an appeal to the judgment approving the settlement. On January 31, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied the objector's appeal and affirmed the district court's approval of the class action settlement. On February 6, 2020, the objector petitioned the Court of Appeals for a rehearing, which was denied on March 3, 2020. On October 5, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari the objector filed on May 11, 2020 seeking review of the Court of Appeals' decision. The settlement is in the process of being administered.

~~Wage-and-Hour Class Action.~~ ~~On March 13, 2018, JFC and Edward Jones were named as defendants in a purported collective and class action lawsuit (Bland, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P, et al.~~) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by four former financial advisors. The lawsuit was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) as well as Missouri and Illinois law and alleges that the defendants unlawfully attempted torecoup training costs from departing financial advisors and failed to pay all overtime owed to financial advisor trainees among other claims. The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory and liquidated damages. On March 19, 2019, the court entered an order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss all claims, but permitting the plaintiffs to amend and re-file certain of their claims. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on May 3, 2019. On March 30, 2020, the court partially granted the defendants' renewed motion to dismiss the amended complaint and dismissed seven of the ten causes of action it purported to state. The court's order eliminated from the case any claims that rely upon the firm's contractual

~~PART II~~

~~Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued~~

~~right to recoup training~~ costs as well as related claims for declaratory relief. It also dismissed various state law claims. JFC and Edward Jones deny the allegations in the remaining counts and intend to vigorously defend against the allegations in this lawsuit.

Securities Class Action. On March 30, 2018, Edward Jones and its affiliated entities and individuals were named as defendants in a putative class action (Anderson, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The lawsuit originally was brought under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act, as well as Missouri and California law and alleges that the defendants inappropriately transitioned client assets from commission-based accounts to fee-based programs. The plaintiffs requested declaratory, equitable, and exemplary relief, and compensatory damages. On July 9, 2019, the district court entered an order dismissing the lawsuit in its entirety without prejudice. On July 29, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, which eliminated certain ~~affiliated entities and individuals as~~ defendants, withdrew the ~~claims under the~~ Securities Act claims, added claims under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Advisers Act"), and certain additional state law claims, and reasserted the remaining claims with modified allegations. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their Investment Advisers Act claims, and on November 12, 2019, the district court granted the defendants' motion to ~~dismiss.~~dismiss all other claims. The plaintiffs appealed the district court's dismissal of certain of their state law claims on jurisdictional grounds but did not appeal the dismissal of the remaining claims. On March 4, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's ~~decision, holding~~dismissal of those state law claims. After further appellate proceedings in the ~~district court has jurisdiction over~~Ninth Circuit, defendants filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, which was denied on January 18, 2022. On February 2, 2022, the defendants filed a renewed motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' remaining state law claims ~~that were the subject of the plaintiffs' appeal, and remanded the case to~~in the district ~~court for further proceedings on those claims.~~court. Edward Jones and its affiliated entities and individuals deny the plaintiffs' allegations and intend to continue to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

Gender and Race Discrimination Class Action. On ~~May 24, 2018,~~March 9, 2022, Edward Jones and JFC were named as defendants in a ~~putative class action~~ lawsuit (~~Bland~~Dixon, et al. v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al.) filed in the U.S. District Court for the ~~Northern~~Eastern District of ~~Illinois~~Missouri. The lawsuit was brought by a current financial advisor as a putative collective action alleging discrimination against women financial advisors under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended by the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206, and by a former financial advisor ~~under 42 U.S.C. § 1981,~~as a putative class action alleging ~~that the defendants discriminated~~discrimination against ~~the former~~non-white financial ~~advisor and other financial~~ advisors and financial advisor trainees on the basis of race. On July 27, 2018, two named plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding allegations of discrimination and retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. ~~On November 26, 2018, three named plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. The lawsuit seeks equitable and injunctive relief, as well as compensatory and punitive damages.~~ Edward Jones and JFC deny the allegations and intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

~~Reimbursement Class Action.~~ ~~On April 25, 2019, Edward Jones and JFC were named as defendants in a putative class action (Watson, et al. v. The Jones Financial Companies L.L.L.P., et al.~~) filed by two former financial advisors in the Superior Court of the State of California, Sacramento County. Plaintiffs allege that defendants did not reimburse financial advisors and financial advisor trainees in California for certain categories of business expenses, which plaintiffs allege violates the California Labor Code and California Unfair Competition Law. The lawsuit seeks damages and restitution as well as attorneys' fees and costs and equitable and injunctive relief. On February 19, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a motion seeking the court's approval of a proposed class action settlement reached by the parties. On November 16, 2020, the court granted final approval of the settlement. The settlement is in the process of being administered.

In addition to these matters, the Partnership provides for potential losses that may arise related to other contingencies. The Partnership assesses its liabilities and contingencies utilizing available information. The Partnership accrues for potential losses for those matters where it is probable that the Partnership will incur a potential loss to the extent that the amount of such potential loss can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with FASB ASC No. 450, Contingencies. This liability represents the Partnership’s estimate of the probable loss at December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, after considering, among other factors, the progress of each case, the Partnership's experience with other legal and regulatory matters and discussion with legal counsel, and is believed to be sufficient. The aggregate accrued liability ~~which was not material as of December 31, 2020,~~ is recorded within the accounts payable, accrued expenses and other line of the Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Financial Condition and may be adjusted from time to time to reflect any relevant developments.

For such matters where an accrued liability has not been established and the Partnership believes a loss is both reasonably possible and estimable, as well as for matters where an accrued liability has been recorded but for which an exposure to loss in excess of the amount accrued is both reasonably possible and estimable, the current estimated aggregated range of additional possible loss is up to ~~$18~~$43 as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. This range of reasonably possible loss does not necessarily represent the Partnership's maximum loss exposure as the Partnership was not able to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss for all matters.

~~PART II~~

~~Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued~~

Further, the matters underlying any disclosed estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly. While the outcome of these matters is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, the Partnership believes that its established liabilities at December 31, ~~2020~~2021 are adequate and the liabilities arising from such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Partnership. However, based on future developments and the potential unfavorable resolution of these matters, the outcome could be material to the Partnership’s future consolidated operating results for a particular period or periods.

PART II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 15 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Partnership has determined it has 2 operating and reportable segments based upon geographic location, the U.S. and Canada. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Canada segment information, as reported in the following table, is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership's Canada operations, which primarily occur through a non-guaranteed subsidiary of the Partnership. For computation of segment information, the Partnership allocates costs incurred by the U.S. entity in support of Canada operations to the Canada segment and does not eliminate intercompany items, such as management fees paid to affiliated entities. The U.S. segment information is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements less the Canada segment information as presented. Pre-variable income represents income before variable compensation expense and before allocations to partners. This is consistent with how management reviews the segments to assess performance.

The Partnership evaluates segment performance based upon income (loss) before allocations to partners, as well as income before variable compensation (“pre-variable income”). Variable compensation is determined at the Partnership level for profit sharing and home office associate and branch office administrator bonus amounts, and therefore is allocated to each geographic segment independent of that segment’s individual pre-variable income. Financial advisor bonuses are determined by the overall Partnership’s profitability, as well as the performance of the individual financial advisors. Both income (loss) before allocations to partners and pre-variable income are considered in evaluating segment performance. Long-lived assets are not disclosed because the balances are not used for evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to segments. However, total assets for each segment are provided for informational purposes, as well as capital expenditures and depreciation and amortization.

PART II

~~NOTE 16 – SEGMENT INFORMATION~~

The Partnership has determined it has two operating and reportable segments based upon geographic location, the U.S. and Canada. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Canada segment information, as reported in the following table, is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership's Canada operations, which primarily occur through a non-guaranteed subsidiary of the Partnership. For computation of segment information, the Partnership allocates costs incurred by the U.S. entity in support of Canada operations to the Canada segment and does not eliminate intercompany items, such as management fees paid to affiliated entities. The U.S. segment information is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements less the Canada segment information as presented. Pre-variable income represents income before variable compensation expense and before allocations to partners. This is consistent with how management reviews the segments to assess performance.

~~PART II~~

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

The following table shows financial information for the Partnership’s reportable segments for the years ended December ~~31, 2020, 2019, and 2018:~~31:


	2020			2019			2018			2021		2020			2019
Net revenue:
U.S.	$	9,805		$	9,127		$	8,233		$	11,946	$	9,805		$	9,127
Canada		258			242			236			333		258			242
Total net revenue	$	10,063		$	9,369		$	8,469		$	12,279	$	10,063		$	9,369

Net interest and dividends revenue:
U.S.	$	99		$	249		$	228		$	69	$	99		$	249
Canada		6			10			9			4		6			10
Total net interest and dividends revenue	$	105		$	259		$	237		$	73	$	105		$	259

Pre-variable income:
U.S.	$	2,673		$	2,194		$	1,972		$	3,489	$	2,673		$	2,194
Canada		26			16			16			65		26			16
Total pre-variable income	$	2,699		$	2,210		$	1,988		$	3,554	$	2,699		$	2,210

Variable compensation:
U.S.	$	1,385		$	1,094		$	975		$	1,907	$	1,385		$	1,094
Canada		29			24			23			42		29			24
Total variable compensation	$	1,414		$	1,118		$	998		$	1,949	$	1,414		$	1,118

Income (loss) before allocations to partners:
U.S.	$	1,288		$	1,100		$	997		$	1,582	$	1,288		$	1,100
Canada		(3	)		(8	)		(7	)		23		(3	)		(8	)
Total income before allocations to partners	$	1,285		$	1,092		$	990		$	1,605	$	1,285		$	1,092

Capital expenditures:
U.S.	$	126		$	170		$	102		$	229	$	126		$	170
Canada		3			6			3			5		3			6
Total capital expenditures	$	129		$	176		$	105		$	234	$	129		$	176

Depreciation and amortization:
U.S.	$	123		$	113		$	92		$	445	$	428		$	421
Canada		2			2			2			16		15			11
Total depreciation and amortization	$	125		$	115		$	94		$	461	$	443		$	432

Total assets at year end:
U.S.	$	27,258		$	18,577		$	15,187		$	31,034	$	27,776		$	19,025
Canada		1,062			740			628			1,174		1,078			752
Total assets	$	28,320		$	19,317		$	15,815		$	32,208	$	28,854		$	19,777

Financial advisors at year end:
U.S.		18,321			17,830			16,797			17,971		18,321			17,830
Canada		904			874			818			852		904			874
Total financial advisors		19,225			18,704			17,615			18,823		19,225			18,704

7173

PART II

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

NOTE 1716 – RELATED PARTIES

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Partnership leased approximately ~~11%~~10% of its branch office space from its financial advisors. The associated lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition ~~were both $89 and $83 at~~as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $95and ~~2019,~~$96 and $89 and $89, respectively. Lease cost related to these leases was ~~$35~~$37, $35 and ~~$34~~$34 for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. ~~Rent and other lease-related expenses were $32 for the year ended December 31, 2018.~~ These leases are executed and maintained in a similar manner as those entered into with third parties. See Note 32 for additional information about the Partnership's leases.

Olive Street is the investment adviser to the eight sub-advised mutual funds comprising the BB ~~Trust and~~Trust. Olive Street has primary responsibility for setting the overall investment strategies and selecting and managing sub-advisers, subject to the review and approval of the BB Trust's Board of Trustees. Olive Street has contractually agreed to waive any investment adviser fees above those amounts paid to the sub-advisers. The investment adviser fee revenue earned by Olive Street, included within asset-based fee revenue onin the Consolidated Statements of Income, is offset by the expense paid to the sub-advisers, included within fund sub-adviser fees on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The total amounts recognized for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 were $233, $174and ~~2018 were $174, $147 and $123,~~$147, respectively.

As the investment adviser to the Money Market Fund, Passport Research has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse fund operating expenses to the extent necessary to limit the annual operating expenses of the Money Market Fund. For the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, Passport Research earned ~~$56~~$15 and $56 in investment management fees, respectively, net of waived fees of $7$51 and $7 in the respective periods to maintain a positive client yield on the Money Market Fund in light of the low interest rate environment ~~throughout most of the year.~~in those years. For the ~~years~~year ended December 31, 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ Passport Research earned ~~$58 and $48, respectively,~~$58 in investment management fees ~~with no~~without waived ~~fees in those periods.~~fees. Further, Edward Jones earns certain fees from the Money Market Fund, some or all of which may be voluntarily waived. For the ~~three~~year ended December 31, 2021, Edward Jones waived all $190 earned in fees. For the years ended December 31, 2020 ~~2019~~ and ~~2018,~~2019 total fees earned were ~~$46, $138~~$46 and ~~$113,~~$138, respectively, net of the ~~$133, $30~~$133 and ~~$30~~$30 of waived fees in the respective periods. Edward Jones waived fees in 2021, 2020, and 2019 to limit the Money Market Fund's annual operating expenses, ~~in the respective periods,~~ as well as to maintain a positive client yield in 2021 and 2020 in light of the low interest rate environment ~~throughout most of the year.~~ in those years.

In the normal course of business, partners and associates of the Partnership and its affiliates use the same advisory, brokerage and trust services of the Partnership as unrelated third parties, with certain discounts on commissions and fees for certain services. The Partnership has included balances arising from such transactions in the Consolidated Financial Statements on the same basis as other clients.

The Partnership recognizes interest income for the interest earned from partners who elect to finance a portion or all of their Partnership capital contributions through loans made available from the Partnership (see Note ~~10)~~9).

NOTE 17 – OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

~~NOTE 18 – QUARTERLY INFORMATION~~ ~~(Unaudited)~~The Partnership does not offset financial instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. However, the Partnership enters into master netting arrangements with counterparties for securities purchased under agreements to resell that are subject to net settlement in the event of default. These agreements create a right of offset for the amounts due to and due from the same counterparty in the event of default or bankruptcy.

The following table shows the Partnership's securities purchased under agreements to resell as of December 31:

2020 Quarters Ended

Mar 27

Jun 26

Sep 25

Dec 31

Net revenue

$
2,491

$
2,325

$
2,527

$
2,720

Income before allocations to partners

$
303

$
288

$
316

$
378

Income allocated to limited partners per
weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited
partnership unit outstanding

$
34.90

$
33.10

$
36.36

$
43.45


			Gross amounts	Net amounts		Gross amounts not offset
			offset in the	presented in the		in the Consolidated
	Gross		Consolidated	Consolidated		Statements of Financial
	amounts of		Statements of	Statements of		Condition
	recognized		Financial	Financial		Financial	Securities
	assets		Condition	Condition		instruments	collateral			Net amount
2021	$	1,529	0		1,529	0		(1,526	)	$	3
2020	$	1,714	0		1,714	0		(1,714	)	$	0

2019 Quarters Ended

Mar 29

Jun 28

Sep 27

Dec 31

Net revenue

$
2,190

$
2,319

$
2,367

$
2,493

Income before allocations to partners

$
241

$
285

$
281

$
285

Income allocated to limited partners per
weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited
partnership unit outstanding

$
29.20

$
34.55

$
33.93

$
34.54

PART II

~~Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued~~

~~NOTE 19 – OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES~~

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, continued

The Partnership does not offset financial instruments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. However, the Partnership enters into master netting arrangements with counterparties for securities purchased under agreements to resell that are subject to net settlement in the event of default. These agreements create a right of offset for the amounts due to and due from the same counterparty in the event of default or bankruptcy.

~~The following table shows the Partnership's securities purchased under agreements to resell as of December 31, 2020 and 2019:~~

Gross amounts

Net amounts

Gross amounts not offset

offset in the

presented in the

in the Consolidated

Gross

Consolidated

Consolidated

Statements of Financial

amounts of

Statements of

Statements of

Condition

recognized

Financial

Financial

Financial

Securities

assets

Condition

Condition

instruments

collateral⁽¹⁾

Net amount

2020

$
1,714

—

1,714

—

(1,714
)

$
—

2019

$
1,693

—

1,693

—

(1,693
)

$
—

⁽¹⁾	~~Actual collateral was 102% of the related assets in U.S. agreements and 100% in Canada agreements for all periods presented.~~

NOTE 2018 – CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The following table shows supplemental cash flow information for the years ended December ~~31, 2020, 2019~~31:


	2021		2020		2019
Cash paid for interest	$	94	$	103	$	157
Cash paid for taxes	$	13	$	11	$	10
Non-cash activities:
Issuance of general partnership interests through partnership loans in current year	$	222	$	163	$	164
Repayment of partnership loans through distributions from partnership capital in current year	$	225	$	182	$	136
Declared distributions for retired partnership capital in current year but unpaid at year-end(1)	$	254	$	145	$	113

(1)

Declared distributions for retired Partnership capital are included in the accounts payable, accrued expenses and ~~2018:~~

other line of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

2020

2019

2018

Cash paid for interest

$
103

$
157

$
125

Cash paid for taxes

$
11

$
10

$
10

Non-cash activities:

Issuance of general partnership interests through
   partnership loans in current year

$
163

$
164

$
170

Repayment of partnership loans through distributions
   from partnership capital in current year

$
182

$
136

$
135

Declared distributions for retired partnership capital
   in current year but unpaid at year end⁽¹⁾

$
145

$
113

$
97

~~(1)~~

~~Declared distributions for retired Partnership capital are included in the accounts payable, accrued expenses and other line of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.~~

The following table reconciles certain line items onin the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition to the cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance onin the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December ~~31, 2020, 2019, and 2018:~~31:


	2020		2019		2018		2021		2020		2019
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,125	$	1,014	$	1,498	$	1,835	$	1,125	$	1,014
Cash and investments segregated under federal regulations		17,918		10,387		8,241		20,179		17,918		10,387
Less: Investments segregated under federal regulations		12,168		3,394		1,002		14,308		12,168		3,394
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	6,875	$	8,007	$	8,737	$	7,706	$	6,875	$	8,007

Restricted cash represents cash segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of U.S. clients pursuant to the Customer Protection Rule 15c3-3 under the Exchange Act.

ITEM 9. CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ~~ACCOUNTANTS~~ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Partnership’s certifying officers, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation, with the participation of its management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and we were required to apply our judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the date of completion of the evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. We will continue to review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting, on an ongoing basis, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure our systems evolve with our business.

Management's report on internal control over financial reporting and the report of independent registered public accounting firm are set forth in Part II, Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

JFC does not have a board of directors. As of February ~~26, 2021,~~25, 2022, the Partnership was composed of ~~23,967~~24,571 individual partners, many of whom hold more than one type of partnership interest. Of those individuals, ~~586~~589 were general partners and ~~23,839~~23,381 were limited partners, ~~2,975~~3,098 of whom are also service partners, and ~~570~~601 were subordinated limited partners as of February ~~26, 2021.~~25, 2022.

Managing Partner. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Managing Partner has primary responsibility for administering the Partnership’s business, determining its policies, and controlling the management and conduct of the Partnership’s business. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the Managing Partner's powers include, without limitation, the power to admit and dismiss general partners and the power to adjust the proportion of their respective interests in the Partnership. The Managing Partner serves for an indefinite term and may be removed by a majority vote of the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT (as discussed below) or a vote of the general partners holding a majority percentage ownership in the Partnership. If at any time the office of the Managing Partner is vacant, the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT will succeed to all the powers and duties of the Managing Partner until a new Managing Partner is elected by a majority of the ~~Executive Committee.~~ELT. The Partnership’s operating subsidiaries are managed by JFC, under the leadership of the Managing Partner, pursuant to services agreements.

~~Executive Committee.~~ ~~The~~Enterprise Leadership Team. On September 1, 2021, the Partnership adopted the Twenty-First Amended and Restated Agreement of Registered Limited Liability Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement"), which renamed the Partnership's Executive Committee as the ELT. The ELT consists of the Managing Partner and ~~five~~up to ~~nine~~15 additional general partners appointed by the Managing Partner, with the specific number determined by the Managing Partner. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, the members of the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT are the executive officers of the Partnership. The purpose of the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT is to provide counsel and advice to the Managing Partner in discharging ~~her~~their functions, including the consideration of ownership of Partnership capital, ensuring the Partnership’s business risks are managed appropriately and helping to establish the strategic direction of the Partnership. In addition, the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT takes an active role in identifying, measuring and controlling the risks to which the Partnership is subject. ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members serve for an indefinite term and may be removed by the Managing Partner or a vote of general partners holding a majority percentage ownership in the Partnership. Furthermore, in the event the position of Managing Partner is vacant, the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT shall succeed to all of the powers and duties of the Managing Partner until a new Managing Partner is elected by a majority of the ~~Executive Committee.~~ELT. The Partnership does not have a formal code of ethics that applies to its ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members, as it relies on the core values and beliefs of the Partnership, as well as the Partnership Agreement. Throughout all of ~~2020,~~2021, the ELT, which prior to September 1, 2021 was known as the Executive Committee, included Penny Pennington, Chairman, Kevin D. Bastien, Kenneth R. Cella, Jr., Thomas P. Curran, ~~Vincent J. Ferrari,~~Lisa M. Dolan, Kristin M. Johnson and Christopher N. Lewis. ~~On August 10, 2020, Lisa Dolan was~~Effective September 1, 2021, Tina M. Hrevus, Francis T. LaQuinta, Andrew T. Miedler, Timothy A. Rea and Wayne A. Roberts were admitted to the ~~Executive Committee.~~ELT. Effective December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, Mr. ~~Ferrari~~Curran retired from the Partnership and ~~was~~is no longer a member of the ~~Executive Committee.~~ELT.

The following table is a listing as of February ~~26, 2021~~25, 2022 of the members of the ~~Executive Committee, each member’s age, the year in which each member became an Executive Committee member, the~~ELT year in which each member became a general partner and each member’s area of responsibility. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, all general partners, including the members of the ~~Executive Committee,~~ELT, are required to retire in their capacity as general partners by the end of the calendar year during which they turn the age of 65. The members’ biographies are below.

Penny Pennington, Managing Partner– Ms. Pennington joined the Partnership in 2000 as a financial advisor, was named a general partner in 2006 and has served as Managing Partner and Chief Executive Officer since January 2019. She has held a number of senior leadership roles in key divisions. Most recently, she led the Client Strategies Group since 2015. Previously, she was responsible for the New Financial Advisor Training department, ~~BOA~~Branch Office Administrator Development department and Branch and Region Development division. Ms. Pennington holds a Chartered Financial Analyst designation, is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School Securities Industry Institute, earned her MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and earned her bachelor’s degree from the University of Virginia. Ms. Pennington ~~serves as a~~is an active member of the St. Louis community, serving on the boards of the Federal Reserve ~~Board~~Bank of ~~Directors.~~St. Louis, United Way of Greater St. Louis, the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, Washington University, the Whitaker Foundation and Executive Committee of the Chair's Council for Greater St. Louis, Inc.

Andrew T. Miedler, Chief Financial Officer – Mr. Miedler joined the Partnership in 2002 in the Equity Research department as an analyst, was named a general partner in 2011 and has served as Chief Financial Officer since November 2021, responsible for the performance of the Finance Division. Mr. Miedler joined the Finance division in 2014 and became Finance division leader in 2020. Previously, he was responsible for the Packaged Products and Capital Markets areas of Product Review. Mr. Miedler holds a Certified Public Accountant designation as well as a Chartered Financial Analyst designation and earned his bachelor's and master's degrees from the University of Missouri-Columbia.

Kevin D. Bastien, Chief ~~Financial~~Strategy Officer – Mr. Bastien joined the Partnership in 1996, was named a general partner in 1998 and has served as the firm's Chief Strategy Officer since November 2021. Previously, Mr. Bastien served as Chief Financial Officer ~~since January 2009. He is~~from 2009 to 2021, responsible for the performance of the Finance ~~division~~Division and Firm Strategy. ~~Previously~~In Mr. Bastien's role as Chief Strategy Officer he ~~has been~~continues to be responsible for ~~various areas of~~developing firm strategy and the ~~Finance division.~~strategic planning process. Mr. Bastien earned his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in accounting from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.

Kenneth R. Cella, Jr., ~~Client Strategies Group~~Branch Development – Mr. Cella joined the Partnership in 1990 and was named a general partner in 2002. Mr. Cella is responsible for the Financial Advisor Channel for Edward Jones across the United States and Canada. Previously he was responsible for the Client Strategies Group, ~~which includes the firm's Marketing, Products, Advice and Guidance, Trading, Solutions and Systems and Support areas. Mr. Cella has held~~ a number of senior leadership roles across ~~divisions. Previously he was responsible for the Branch Development division, the Branch Training department, various areas of the Client Strategies Group~~divisions and worked as a financial advisor. Mr. Cella earned his bachelor’s degree from the University of Missouri-St. Louis and an MBA from Washington University in St. Louis. Mr. Cella serves on the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ("SIFMA") Board of Directors and Private Client Group Steering Committee.

~~Thomas P. Curran, Branch Development –~~ Mr. Curran joined the Partnership in 1992 and was named a general partner in 2006. Mr. Curran is responsible for the Branch Development division, which encompasses Branch Team Market Optimization, Branch Team Performance, Firm Inclusion and Diversity, Branch Development Strategic Services and Branch and Region Development. Previously he was responsible for Financial Advisor Talent Acquisition, led the Service Division, acted as the Banking Services global leader, served as a regional leader and worked as a financial advisor. Mr. Curran received his bachelor's degree from Augustana College and his master's degree from the University of Iowa.

Lisa M. Dolan, Chief Operating Officer – Ms. Dolan joined the Edward Jones Finance division in 2005 and was named a ~~principal~~general partner in 2007. Ms. Dolan has held leadership roles in tax and partnership accounting, financial and regulatory reporting, expenditure management, compensation accounting, finance systems, and has led the Finance division. Ms. Dolan ~~was appointed to the Partnership’s Audit Committee in 2014. In August 2020, Ms. Dolan was appointed to the Partnership's Executive Committee and assumed~~has responsibility for leading Operations, Service, ~~Firm Analytics,~~Enterprise Risk Management, Strategic Enablement and Planning and Workplace Services. Ms. Dolan earned a bachelor's degree from Saint Louis University and is a certified public accountant.

Tina M. Hrevus, Managing Partner's Office – Ms. Hrevus joined Edward Jones in 1987, was named a general partner in 2012 and joined the Managing Partner's Office in 2019. Ms. Hrevus has held leadership roles responsible for Marketing and communication disciplines and brings more than 30 years of marketing expertise to strengthen and support the Managing Partner’s office. Ms. Hrevus has overall responsibility for Purpose, Community and Philanthropy and serves as the Managing Partner's chief of staff. Ms. Hrevus is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School Securities Industry Institute and the University of Missouri-Columbia's School of Journalism. She serves as a member of the United Way of Greater St. Louis Board of Directors and the Fair St. Louis Foundation Board of Directors.

Kristin M. Johnson, Chief Human ResourcesOfficer and Chief Transformation Officer – Ms. Johnson joined the Partnership in 1995 and was named a general partner in 2006. Ms. Johnson has held leadership roles in internal audit, service, operations and talent acquisition and performance for BOAs. Ms. Johnson ~~was appointed to the Partnership's Executive Committee in November 2019 and was named~~serves as the firm's Chief Human Resources Officer and Chief Transformation Officer. Ms. Johnson earned her bachelor's degree from the University of Illinois, a master's in information management from Webster University and completed Washington University's executive MBA program.

Francis T. LaQuinta, Chief Information Officer – Mr. LaQuinta joined the Edward Jones Technology division in 2016 as general partner and senior director for Strategic Delivery. Mr. LaQuinta became Chief Information Officer in 2018 responsible for the firm's overall technology leadership, vision and digital strategy. Mr. LaQuinta is currently also responsibility for digital product management and data strategy. Mr. LaQuinta earned a bachelor's and master's degree from Pace University and is a member of the St. Louis CIO council.

Christopher N. Lewis, General Counsel–Mr. Lewis joined the Partnership ~~as a general partner~~ in 2007 as Deputy General ~~Counsel.~~Counsel in the legal division. In 2015, Mr. Lewis was named General Counsel and is responsible for leading the Partnership's legal, compliance and government relations areas. Mr. Lewis is a graduate of Columbia University School of Law and earned his bachelor's degree from Manhattanville College. He is a member of the FINRA National Arbitration and Mediation Committee, the FINRA National Adjudicatory Council, the Executive Committee of the SIFMA Compliance and Legal Society and ~~is a member of~~ the SIFMA General Counsel Committee.

Timothy A. Rea, Chief Marketing Officer– Mr. Rea joined Edward Jones in 2016. As Chief Marketing Officer, he is responsible for the firm’s marketing, branding and experience initiatives. Mr. Rea previously served as the executive vice president and chief marketing officer for Office Depot Inc., senior vice president of brand marketing for Darden Restaurants, and had increasing brand management leadership positions at Hershey Foods Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Co. Mr. Rea earned his bachelor's degree in economics from Harvard University and his master's degree in economics from the University of Texas at El Paso.

Wayne A. Roberts, Head of Business Segments – Mr. Roberts joined Edward Jones in 1994 as a financial advisor. He was named a regional leader in 2006 and a general partner in 2008. Since 2008, Mr. Roberts has held numerous leadership roles in the Branch Development Division including Talent Acquisition, and Branch and Region Development, as well as the Client Strategies Group. In his current role, Mr. Roberts is responsible for the development and implementation of business segment strategies, as well as developing future market and business segment opportunities. Mr. Roberts earned his bachelor's degree in finance from Linfield College in McMinnvile, Oregon, and his executive MBA from Washington University in St. Louis.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee was created by the Partnership Agreement. The Audit Committee operates according to its charter adopted by the ~~Executive Committee.~~ELT. Pursuant to its charter and the Partnership Agreement, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the Partnership's independent auditors. The Audit Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of an understanding of the Partnership’s financial statements and the financial reporting process, overseeing the Partnership’s efforts to comply with the financial reporting control requirements of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes Oxley”) and ~~providing input to~~the performance of the Partnership’s Internal Audit division regarding audit topics and the resolution of outstanding audit findings.

As of February ~~26, 2021,~~25, 2022, the Audit Committee was comprised of Kristin M. Johnson, Chair, Penny Pennington, ~~Kevin D. Bastien, Kenneth R. Cella, Jr., Thomas P. Curran,~~Andrew T. Miedler, Lisa M. Dolan, Christopher N. Lewis, ~~Robert F. Cullen III, the general partner responsible for the Internal Audit division,~~ and independent ~~members~~member of the committee ~~Edward L. Glotzbach and~~ Mark E. Wuller.

Mr. ~~Bastien~~Miedler meets the requirements adopted by the SEC for qualification as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K. Because Mr. ~~Bastien~~Miedler is a general partner, he would not meet the definition of “independent” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). However, since the Partnership’s securities are not listed on any exchange, it is not subject to the listing requirements of the NYSE or any other securities exchanges. Audit Committee members are appointed by the Managing Partner, serve for an indefinite term and may be removed by the Managing Partner.

Other ~~Committees. In 2020, the Management Committee was discontinued and the firm~~Committees. The Partnership has established a system of forums to assist the Managing Partner with respect to ~~the Partnership's~~ operations.

The Partnership’s business model and activities expose it to a number of different risks. The most significant risks to which the Partnership is subject include business and operational risks, including security breaches; credit risk; market, liquidity and competition ~~risk;~~risks; and legal, regulatory and reputational ~~risk.~~risks. The identification and ongoing management of the Partnership’s ~~risk~~risks is critical to its long-term business success and related financial performance.

The Partnership's risk management framework is driven by the Partnership's governance structure established in the Partnership Agreement. The Managing Partner is ultimately responsible for the Partnership's risk management. The Managing Partner has designated the Partnership's ~~Executive Committee~~ELT as having responsibility for overall risk management. As disclosed under Part II, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance – ~~Executive Committee,~~ELT, as of February ~~26, 2021,~~25, 2022, the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT consisted of the ~~Partnership’s~~ Managing Partner and ~~six~~ten other general partners, each responsible for broad functional areas of the Partnership. The ~~Executive Committee~~ELT takes an active role in identifying, measuring and controlling the risks to which the Partnership is subject. The ~~Executive Committee~~ELT communicates regularly and meets periodically to meet its responsibilities.

The Audit Committee, through its activities, supports the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT in its ongoing risk management responsibilities. The Audit Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of an understanding of the Partnership’s financial statements and the financial reporting process, overseeing the Partnership’s efforts to comply with the financial reporting control requirements of Sarbanes Oxley, discussing policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, overseeing the independent auditors' qualifications and independence, and ~~providing input to~~the performance of the Partnership’s Internal Audit division regarding audit topics and the resolution of outstanding audit findings.

In addition to these committees, the Managing Partner has established certain governance committees with prominent roles in the risk management process. Also, certain supporting committees have responsibility for managing specific types of risks. Governance and supporting committees with prominent roles in the risk management process include:

Enterprise Risk Management Committee – governance committee, led by the Chief Risk Officer, responsible for facilitating the Partnership's identification of risks and assisting and collaborating with other governance committees as well as supporting committees that may oversee specific risks. The committee also helps coordinate and serves as a resource regarding the Partnership's risk management activities.

New Products and Services Committee – governance committee responsible for evaluating all new or materially modified products and/or services for alignment with clients’ needs and consistency with the Partnership’s objectives and strategies, making recommendations to the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT and ensuring that all areas of the Partnership are sufficiently prepared to support, service, and supervise any new or materially modified products and/or services. A new product or service has to be approved by the New Products and Services Committee and the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT before being implemented by the Partnership.

~~Investment Funds Governance Committee –~~ governance committee responsible for reviewing the fundamental strategy decisions of JFC's wholly-owned investment advisors to the Partnership's proprietary investment funds, including providing guidance on various aspects of operations and coordinating communications with the boards of the Partnership's proprietary mutual funds.

Investment Policy Committee – governance committee responsible for the Partnership's investment philosophy and development and the alignment of the advice and guidance necessary to help clients meet their long-term financial goals. Guidance is primarily related to investments and solutions and the way such investments and solutions are constructed into portfolios and tailored to meet clients' needs.

Credit Review Committee – supporting committee that establishes policies governing the Partnership’s client margin accounts. The committee discusses and monitors the risks associated with the Partnership’s client margin practices and current trends in the industry. The committee reviews large client margin balances, the quality of the collateral supporting those accounts, and the credit exposure related to those accounts to minimize potential losses.

Finance Risk Committee – supporting committee that reviews the Partnership’s financial liquidity, cash investment portfolio and capital adequacy and assesses major exposures to financial institutions. These exposures include banks in which the Partnership has deposits or on which it depends for funding.

In addition to the committees discussed above, each of the Partnership’s divisions also assists the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT in its ongoing risk management activities through their day-to-day responsibilities.

As part of the financial services industry, the Partnership’s business is subject to inherent risks. As a result, despite its risk management efforts and activities, there can be no absolute assurance that the Partnership will not experience significant unexpected losses due to the realization of certain operational or other risks to which the Partnership is subject. The following discussion highlights the Partnership’s procedures and policies designed to identify, assess, and manage the primary risks of its operations.

There is an element of operational risk inherent within the Partnership’s business. The Partnership is exposed to operational risk and its business model is dependent on complex information technology systems, and there is a degree of exposure to systems failure. Further, the Partnership's information technology systems, and those of third parties the Partnership relies on, are subject to security breaches. The Partnership has processes in place designed to safeguard and monitor against such security breaches and other disruptions. A business continuity planning process has been established to respond to severe business disruptions. The Partnership and its third-party vendors have data centers in separate regions of the United States. ~~These~~The Partnership's data centers act as disaster recovery and redundant sites with each other. While these data centers are designed to be redundant with one another, a prolonged interruption of any site might result in a delay of service and substantial costs and expenses.

In order to address the Partnership’s risk of identifying fraudulent or inappropriate activity, the Partnership has an anonymous ethics hotline for employees to report suspicious activity for review and disciplinary action when necessary. The Partnership’s Internal Audit division receives ethics hotline reports from a third-party provider, and the Compliance, Human Resources or Legal divisions investigate reports as they are received. The Internal Audit and Compliance divisions review other Partnership activity to assist in risk identification and identification of other inappropriate activities. In addition, the Partnership communicates and provides ongoing training regarding the Partnership’s privacy requirements and information security policies to better protect client information.

The Partnership is also exposed to operational risk as a result of its reliance on third parties to provide information technology, processing and other business support services. The Partnership’s Sourcing Office primarily manages that risk by reviewing key vendors through a vendor due diligence and oversight process.

The Partnership is subject to credit risk due to the very nature of the transactions it processes for its clients. In order to manage this risk, the Partnership limits certain client transactions by, in some cases, requiring payment at the time or in advance of a client transaction being accepted. The Credit Review Committee manages the Partnership's credit risk arising out of the client margin loans it offers by limiting the amount and controlling the quality of collateral held in the client’s account against those loans. Margin loans are limited to a fraction of the total value of the securities held in the client's account against those loans upon issuance in accordance with Federal Reserve Board Regulation T and throughout the life of the loan in accordance with FINRA Rule 4210. In the event of a decline in the market value of the securities in a margin account, the Partnership requires the client to deposit additional securities or cash (or to sell a sufficient amount of securities) so that, at all times, the loan to the client is no greater than 65% of the value of the securities in the account, which is a more stringent requirement than FINRA Rule 4210.

The Partnership purchases and holds inventory security positions for retail sales to its clients and does not trade those positions for the purpose of generating gains for its own account. To monitor inventory positions, the Partnership has an automated trading system designed to report trading positions and risks. This system requires traders to mark positions to market and to report positions at the trader level, at the department level and for the Partnership as a whole. There are established trading and inventory limits for each trader and each department, and activity exceeding those limits is subject to supervisory review. By maintaining an inventory hedging strategy, the Partnership has avoided material inventory losses or gains in the past. The objective of the hedging strategy is to mitigate the risks of carrying its inventory positions and not to generate profit for the Partnership. The compensation of the Partnership’s traders is not directly tied to gains or losses incurred by the Partnership on the inventory, which eliminates the incentive to hold inappropriate inventory positions.

The Partnership also has credit exposure with counterparties as a result of its ongoing, routine business activities. This credit exposure can arise from the settlement of client transactions, related failures to receive and deliver, or related to the Partnership’s overnight investing activities with other financial institutions. The Partnership monitors its exposure to such counterparties on a regular basis through the activities of its Finance Risk Committee in order to minimize its risk of loss related to such exposure.

Market risk is the risk of declining revenue or the value of financial instruments held by the Partnership as a result of fluctuations in interest rates, security prices or overall market conditions. Liquidity risk is the risk of insufficient financial resources to meet the short-term or long-term cash needs of the Partnership. Competition risk is the risk of the Partnership's inability to attract and retain clients and personnel with the increasing pace of industry change. For a discussion of the Partnership’s market, liquidity and competition risk, see Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors. See Part II, Item 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for additional discussion of the Partnership's market and liquidity risk.

Many aspects of the Partnership’s business involve substantial litigation and regulatory risks. The Partnership is, from time to time, subject to examinations, inquiries and investigations by governmental agencies, SROs and other regulators. Such matters have in the past, and could in the future, negatively impact the Partnership’s business and result in significant expenses. In the ~~normal~~ordinary course of business, the Partnership also is ~~involved, from time~~subject to ~~time, in various legal and regulatory matters, including arbitrations, class actions, other litigation and examinations, investigations and proceedings by governmental authorities, SROs~~arbitration claims, lawsuits and other ~~regulators which may result in losses.~~potentially significant litigation such as putative class actions. Over ~~the past several years, the number of legal actions and investigations against many firms in~~time, there has been increasing litigation involving the financial services industry, including ~~the Partnership, has increased.~~putative class action lawsuits that may seek substantial damages. The Partnership's reputation is critical to attracting and retaining clients and financial advisors and could be damaged by certain legal or regulatory actions, unethical behavior, cyber security breaches, poor investment performance, or compliance failures, depending on their nature, size and scope.

The Partnership has established, through its overall compliance program, a variety of policies and procedures (including written supervisory procedures) designed to mitigate legal, regulatory and reputational risks. As a normal course of business, new accounts and client transactions are reviewed on a daily basis, in part, through the Partnership’s field supervision function, to mitigate the risk of non-compliance with regulatory requirements as well as any resulting negative impact on the Partnership’s reputation. To minimize the risk of regulatory non-compliance, each branch office is subject to an annual branch audit, to review the financial advisor’s business and competency. Additionally, certain branches are visited or monitored regularly by field supervision directors to assure reasonable compliance. The Partnership’s Compliance division works with other business areas to advise and consult on business activities to help ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and Partnership policies. The Partnership also has established privacy policies to comply with privacy rules and regulations and trains its employees on privacy requirements, all of which come under the responsibility of the Partnership’s Chief Privacy Officer. The Partnership also has a Chief Information ~~Security~~ Officer who is responsible for information security policies and standards. The Partnership has specific policies related to prevention of fraud and money laundering and provides initial as well as annual training and review of competency to help mitigate regulatory risks.

The Partnership’s compensation program allocates profits to general partners, including members of its ~~Executive Committee,~~ELT, primarily based upon their ownership interests in the Partnership. As general partners, ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members benefit annually from the profits of the Partnership through current cash payments from short-term results and from having an opportunity to continue to share in the long-term profitability of the organization. By owning general partnership interests, ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members are encouraged to balance short-term and long-term results of the Partnership as they have a significant amount of capital at risk. Also, by sharing in any annual operating loss of the Partnership, all general partners, including ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members, have a direct incentive to manage risk and focus on the short- and long-term financial results of the Partnership.

The ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members’ compensation components are the same as the Partnership's other general partners. The components consist of base salary, deferred compensation, and allocations of Partnership net income. ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members do not receive bonuses, stock awards, option awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, or any other elements other than those disclosed below related to their capital ownership interest in the Partnership.

Salary – Each ~~Executive Committee~~ELT member receives an amount of fixed compensation in the form of annual salary. In establishing the salaries listed on the Summary Compensation Table, the Partnership considers individual experience, responsibilities and tenure. Because the Partnership’s principal compensation of ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members is from allocations of Partnership net income, it does not benchmark the compensation of its ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members with compensation to executives at other companies in setting its base salaries, or otherwise in determining the compensation to its ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members. Each ~~Executive Committee~~ELT member receives an annual salary ranging from $175,000 to $250,000.

Deferred Compensation – Each ELT member is a participant in the Partnership’s profit sharing and 401(k) plan, a qualified deferred compensation plan, which also covers all eligible general partners and service partners of the Partnership and associates of the Partnership’s subsidiaries. Each ELT member receives contributions based upon the overall profitability of the Partnership. Contributions to the plan are made annually at the discretion of the Partnership and have historically been determined based on approximately 24% of the Partnership’s net income before allocations to partners. Allocation of the Partnership’s contribution among participants is determined by each participant’s relative level of eligible earnings. The plan is a tax-qualified retirement plan.

Income Allocated to Partners – The majority of the Partnership's general partners’ compensation, including that of the ELT members, comes from their capital ownership interests in the Partnership as general partners, subordinated limited partners and limited partners pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. Of the Partnership’s net income allocated to general partners, including the ELT members, 92% is allocable based upon their respective general partner ownership interests in the Partnership. General partner ownership interests are set at the discretion of the Managing Partner, with input from the ELT. General partner ownership interests held by each ELT member ranged from 0.59% to 1.95% in 2021, 0.98% to 2.0% in 2020, and 0.85% to 1.95% in 2019. The remaining 8% of net income allocated to general partners is distributed based on merit and/or need as determined by the Managing Partner in consultation with the ELT. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership's net income allocated to subordinated limited partners and net income allocated to limited partners, including the applicable ELT members, is allocated based upon their respective subordinated limited partner ownership interests and limited partner ownership interests in the Partnership. In addition, limited partners receive the 7.5% Payment pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. Subordinated limited partner ownership interests and limited partner ownership interests are set at the discretion of the Managing Partner.

~~Deferred Compensation –~~ Each Executive Committee member is a participant in the Partnership’s profit sharing and 401(k) plan, a qualified deferred compensation plan, which also covers all eligible general partners and service partners of the Partnership and associates of the Partnership’s subsidiaries. Each Executive Committee member receives contributions based upon the overall profitability of the Partnership. Contributions to the plan are made annually at the discretion of the Partnership and have historically been determined based on approximately 24% of the Partnership’s net income before allocations to partners. Allocation of the Partnership’s contribution among participants is determined by each participant’s relative level of eligible earnings. The plan is a tax-qualified retirement plan.

~~Income Allocated to Partners –~~ The majority of the Partnership's general partners’ compensation, including that of the Executive Committee members, comes from their capital ownership interests in the Partnership as general partners, subordinated limited partners and limited partners pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. Of the Partnership’s net income allocated to general partners, including the Executive Committee members, 92% is allocable based upon their respective general partner ownership interests in the Partnership. General partner ownership interests are set at the discretion of the Partnership’s Managing Partner, with input from the Executive Committee. General partner ownership interests held by each Executive Committee member ranged from 0.98% to 2.0% in 2020, 0.85% to 1.95% in 2019, and 0.51% to 1.90% in 2018. The remaining 8% of net income allocated to general partners is distributed based on merit and/or need as determined by the Managing Partner in consultation with the Executive Committee. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership's net income allocated to subordinated limited partners and net income allocated to limited partners, including the applicable Executive Committee members, is allocated based upon their respective subordinated limited partner ownership interests and limited partner ownership interests in the Partnership. In addition, limited partners receive the 7.5% Payment pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. Subordinated limited partner ownership interests and limited partner ownership interests are set at the discretion of the Partnership's Managing Partner.

The following table identifies the compensation of the ~~Partnership’s~~ Managing Partner (“CEO”), the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and the three other most highly compensated ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members based on total compensation in ~~2020~~2021 (including respective income allocation).

Income

Deferred

Allocated

Year

Salaries

Compensation

to Partners⁽¹⁾

Total

Penny Pennington

2020

$
250,000

$
14,165

$
17,750,493

$
18,014,658

CEO

2019

250,000

12,992

14,411,114

14,674,106

2018

175,000

12,760

11,482,713

11,670,473

Kevin D. Bastien

2020

$
175,000

$
14,165

$
16,857,259

$
17,046,424

CFO

2019

175,000

12,992

14,036,151

14,224,143

2018

175,000

12,760

13,205,746

13,393,506

Kenneth R. Cella, Jr.

2020

$
175,000

$
14,165

$
16,439,406

$
16,628,571

General Partner - Client Strategies Group

2019

175,000

12,992

12,951,990

13,139,982

2018

175,000

12,760

11,144,115

11,331,875

Thomas P. Curran

2020

$
175,000

$
14,165

$
10,233,604

$
10,422,769

General Partner – Branch Development

Chris N. Lewis

2020

$
175,000

$
14,165

$
10,646,691

$
10,835,856

General Partner – Legal

(1)

Income allocated to partners includes allocations from general partner, subordinated limited partner and limited partner capital ownership interests in the Partnership.

~~(1)~~

Income allocated to partners includes allocations from general partner, subordinated limited partner and limited partner capital ownership interests in the Partnership. One Executive Committee member, Penny Pennington, received a portion of the 8% net income allocation in 2018.

~~PART III~~

~~Item 11. Executive Compensation, continued~~

Pay Ratio Disclosure

The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related regulations require the Partnership to disclose the ratio of the compensation of the Managing Partner and compensation of a median employee of the Partnership as calculated in accordance with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. Item 402(u) permits the Partnership to identify its median employee once every three years unless there has been significant change in compensation structure or overall number of employees, which the Partnership does not believe has occurred. The median employee was selected from a population that represented all employees as of December 31, 2020, using salary and benefits, variable compensation, and allocations of Partnership net income as of December 31, 2020, consistently applied across the employee population. After identifying the median employee, annual total compensation for the median employee and the Managing Partner was calculated using the same methodology as was used in the Summary Compensation Table above.

For ~~2020,~~2021, the median annual total compensation of all employees of the Partnership, including general partners and excluding the Managing Partner, was ~~$70,252~~$84,492 and the annual total compensation of the Managing Partner was ~~$18,014,658~~$22,567,837 or a ratio of ~~256~~267 to 1. The majority of the Managing Partner's total compensation is based on general partner and subordinated limited partner capital ownership interests in the Partnership as indicated above, compared to the compensation of a median employee which is primarily based on ~~his or her~~their annual salary. This ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

PART III

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table shows as of February ~~26, 2021,~~25, 2022, the ownership of limited partnership interests by each ~~Executive Committee~~ELT member named in the Summary Compensation Table and the ~~Executive Committee~~ELT members as a group:

Title of Class

Name of Beneficial Owner

Amount
Beneficially
Owned

% of Class

Limited Partnership Interests

Penny Pennington

$
27,000

*

Limited Partnership Interests

Kevin D. Bastien

$
-

0%

Limited Partnership Interests

Kenneth R. Cella Jr.

$
115,600

*

Limited Partnership Interests

Thomas P. Curran

$
137,000

*

Limited Partnership Interests

Chris N. Lewis

$
-

0%

Limited Partnership Interests

All Executive Committee Members
as a Group (8 persons)

$
319,600

*


Title of Class	Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount Beneficially Owned		% of Class
Limited Partnership Interests	Penny Pennington	$	27,000	*
Limited Partnership Interests	Andrew T. Miedler	$	40,000	*
Limited Partnership Interests	Kevin D. Bastien	$	-	0%
Limited Partnership Interests	Kenneth R. Cella Jr.	$	115,600	*
Limited Partnership Interests	Kristin M. Johnson	$	5,000	*

Limited Partnership Interests	All Enterprise Leadership Team Members as a Group (11 persons)	$	516,000	*

* Each of the ELT members named in the Summary Compensation Table and the ELT members as a group own less than 1% of the limited partnership interests outstanding.

PART III

~~Each of the Executive Committee members named in the Summary Compensation Table and the Executive Committee members as a group own less than 1% of the limited partnership interests outstanding.~~

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

In the ordinary course of its business the Partnership has extended credit to certain of its partners and employees in connection with their purchase of securities. Such extensions of credit have been made on substantially the same terms, including with respect to interest rates and collateral requirements, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. The Partnership also, from time to time and in the ordinary course of business, enters into transactions involving the purchase or sale of securities from or to partners or employees and members of their immediate families, as principal. Such purchases and sales of securities on a principal basis are affected on substantially the same terms as similar transactions with unaffiliated third parties. All amounts in the disclosures below are presented in millions, except as otherwise noted.

The Partnership leases approximately ~~11%~~10% of its branch office space from its financial advisors. The associated lease right-of-use ~~asset~~assets and lease ~~liability~~liabilities included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 were ~~both~~$95 and $96 and $89 and ~~$83 at December 31, 2020 and 2019,~~$89, respectively. Lease cost related to these leases was $37, $35 ~~million~~ and $34 ~~million~~ for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. ~~Rent and other lease-related expenses were $32 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.~~ These leases are executed and maintained in a similar manner as those entered into with third parties.

~~PART III~~

~~Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence, continued~~

The Partnership makes loans available to those general partners ~~(other~~and, in limited circumstances, subordinated limited partners (in each case, other than members of the ~~Executive Committee)~~ELT that desire financing for some or all of their new purchases of individual Partnership capital interests. See Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources for further information.

Policy for Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

The Partnership maintains a policy with respect to related persons, which applies to transactions, arrangements or relationships (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) that are reportable by the Partnership under paragraph (a) of Item 404 of Regulation S-K in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds ~~$120,000~~$120 thousand in any calendar year, and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. For purposes of the policy, the term ‘‘related person’’ has the meaning set forth in Item 404(a) of SEC Regulation S-K ‘‘Transactions with related persons, promoters and certain control persons’’.

Under the policy, the Partnership’s CFO or General Counsel will determine whether a transaction meets the requirements of a related person transaction pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K requiring approval by the Audit Committee. Transactions that fall within the definition will be referred to the Audit Committee for approval, ratification or other action. Based on its consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Audit Committee will decide whether or not to approve such transaction and will approve only those transactions that it determines are in the best interest of the Partnership. If the Partnership’s CFO or General Counsel becomes aware of an existing transaction with a related person which has not been approved under this policy, the matter will be referred to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will evaluate all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of such transaction.

As of December 31, 2020, the following transaction met the definition of a related person transaction pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. This contract was subject to review by appropriate areas within the Partnership prior to execution.

~~Family Relationships~~

The Partnership has an anti-nepotism policy in the home ~~office. However, the Partnership~~office but encourages the recruitment of family and friends to be financial advisors and BOAs. As such, it is very common for family members to be employed by the ~~Partnership and paid consistent with the compensation programs provided to other financial advisors and BOAs of the~~ Partnership. The following summarizes Family Relationships with members of the Partnership’s ~~Executive Committee.~~ELT and their compensation as of December 31, 2021, which was paid consistently with the compensation programs provided to other financial advisors of the Partnership:

Thomas P. Curran, a member of the Partnership's ~~Executive Committee,~~ELT, has a brother, Doug Curran, who was a financial advisor during ~~2020~~2021 (and presently). Doug Curran earned approximately ~~$387,000~~$532 thousand during ~~2020~~2021 and has been employed by the Partnership for 2021 years. ~~The compensation program under which he is paid is consistent with the compensation programs provided to other financial advisors of the Partnership.~~

Mr. Curran has another brother, Chris Curran, who was a financial advisor during ~~2020~~2021 (and presently). Chris Curran earned approximately ~~$341,000~~$487 thousand during ~~2020~~2021 and has been employed by the Partnership for ~~nine~~10 years. ~~The compensation program under which he is paid is consistent with the compensation programs provided to other financial advisors~~

Kevin D. Bastien, a member of the ~~Partnership.~~Partnership's ELT, has a son, Bryce Bastien, who was a financial advisor during 2021 (and presently). Bryce Bastien earned approximately $183 thousand during 2021 and has been employed by the Partnership for 3 years.

8386

PART III

~~ITEM 14.~~

~~PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES~~

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table presents fees ~~paid~~rendered by the ~~Partnership to its~~Partnership's independent registered public accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.


($ thousands)	2021		2020
Audit fees	$	2,752	$	2,720
Audit-related fees(1)		1,299		1,345
Tax fees(2)		412		688
Other(3)		41		6
Total fees	$	4,504	$	4,759

($ thousands)

2020

2019

Audit fees

$
2,720

$
2,827

Audit-related fees⁽¹⁾

1,345

1,370

Tax fees⁽²⁾

688

814

Other⁽³⁾

6

7

Total fees

$
4,759

$
5,018

(1)

Audit-related fees consist primarily of fees for internal control reviews, attestation/agreed-upon procedures, employee benefit plan audits, and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

(2)

Tax fees consist of fees for services relating to tax compliance and other tax planning and advice.

(3)

Other primarily consists of fees for consulting services

~~(1)~~

~~(2)~~

~~Tax fees consist of fees for services relating to tax compliance and other tax planning and advice.~~

~~(3)~~

~~Other primarily consists of fees for consulting services~~

The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit related services in fiscal years ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019.~~2020. No services were provided under the de minimis fee exception to the audit committee pre-approval requirements.

8487

PART IV

~~ITEM 15.~~

~~EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES~~

~~INDEX~~ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

INDEX


			Page No.

(a)	(1)	The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8:

		Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting	4648

		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	4749

		Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020	4951

		Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018~~2019	5052

		Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partnership Capital Subject to Mandatory Redemption for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018~~2019	5153

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018~~2019	5254

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5355

	(2)	The following financial statements are included in Schedule I:

		Parent Company Only Condensed Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019~~2020	9092

		Parent Company Only Condensed Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018~~2019	9193

		Parent Company Only Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, ~~2019,~~ and ~~2018~~2019	9294

		Other schedules are omitted because they are not required, inapplicable, or the information is otherwise shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

(b)		Exhibits

		Reference is made to the Exhibit Index hereinafter contained.

EXHIBIT INDEX

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.


~~ITEM 16.~~Exhibit Number	~~FORM 10-K SUMMARY~~

~~None.~~

~~EXHIBIT INDEX~~

~~Exhibit Number~~		Description
3.1	*	~~Twentieth~~Twenty-First Amended and Restated Agreement of Registered Limited Liability Limited Partnership, dated ~~August 6, 2018,~~September 1, 2021, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 8-K ~~dated August 6, 2018.~~filed on September 7, 2021.
3.2	**	~~Twenty-First~~Twenty-Second Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated ~~January 24, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.~~February 22, 2022.
~~3.3~~ 4.1	*	First Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated February 21, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
~~3.4~~	*	Second Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated March 25, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.4 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2019.
~~3.5~~	*	Third Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated April 22, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.5 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2019.
~~3.6~~	*	Fourth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated May 22, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.6 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2019.
~~3.7~~	*	Fifth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated July 19, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.7 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2019.
~~3.8~~	*	Sixth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated August 19, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.8 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2019.
~~3.9~~	*	Seventh Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated September 17, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.9 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2019.
~~3.10~~	*	Eighth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated November 19, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.10 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
~~3.11~~	*	Ninth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated December 18, 2019, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.11 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
~~3.12~~	*	Tenth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated January 21,2020, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.12 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
~~3.13~~	*	Eleventh Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated February 18,2020, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.13 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

~~EXHIBIT INDEX~~

~~Exhibit Number~~		~~Description~~
~~3.14~~	*	Twelfth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated March 19, 2020, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.14 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2020.
~~3.15~~	*	Thirteenth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated May 18, 2020, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.15 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2020.
~~3.16~~	*	Fourteenth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated June 14, 2020, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.16 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2020.
~~3.17~~	*	Fifteenth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated July 29, 2020, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.17 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2020.
~~3.18~~	*	Sixteenth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated August 18, 2020, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.18 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 25, 2020.
~~3.19~~	*	Seventeenth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated September 22, 2020, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.18 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 25, 2020.
~~3.20~~	**	~~Eighteenth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated November 9, 2020.~~
~~3.21~~	**	~~Nineteenth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated December 11, 2020.~~
~~3.22~~	**	~~Twentieth Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated January 21, 2021.~~
~~3.23~~	**	~~Twenty-first Amendment of Twenty-First Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., dated February 5, 2021.~~
~~4.1~~	*	Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended, of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
10.1	*	Lease between Eckelkamp Office Center South, L.L.C., a Missouri Limited Liability Company, as Landlord and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., as Tenant, dated February 3, 2000, incorporated by reference from The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.
~~10.2~~	*	$500,000,000Credit Agreement dated as of September 28, 2018 among The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. as borrowers and lenders Fifth Third Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to The Jones Financial Companies L.L.L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period September 28, 2018.
~~10.3~~ 10.2	*	Eleventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership Agreement of Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. dated March 10, 2010, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

~~EXHIBIT INDEX~~

~~Exhibit Number~~		~~Description~~
~~10.4~~ 10.3	*	The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. 2018 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-222541) filed on January 12, 2018. (Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement)
10.4	*	The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. 2021 Employee Limited Partnership Interest Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-261542) filed on December 8, 2021. (Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement)
21.1	**	Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1	**	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1	**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	**	Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	**	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL	**	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

EXHIBIT INDEX


101.DEF	**	Inline XBRL Extension Definition
~~101.DEF~~101.LAB	**	~~XBRL Extension Definition~~
~~101.LAB~~	**	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label
101.PRE	**	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation
104	**	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

*	~~Incorporated by reference to previously filed exhibits.~~

**	~~Filed herewith.~~

* Incorporated by reference to previously filed exhibits.

** Filed herewith.

~~SIGNATURES~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

By:	/s/ Penny Pennington
	Penny Pennington
	Managing Partner (Principal Executive Officer)
	March ~~12, 2021~~11, 2022

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated:


Signatures	Title	Date

/s/ Penny Pennington	Managing Partner	March ~~12, 2021~~11, 2022
Penny Pennington	(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ ~~Kevin D. Bastien~~Andrew T. Miedler	Chief Financial Officer	March ~~12, 2021~~11, 2022
~~Kevin D. Bastien~~Andrew T. Miedler	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

8991

Schedule I

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

(Parent Company Only)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION


	December 31,		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2020		2019		2021		2020
ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents	$	323	$	320	$	266	$	323

Investment securities		3		2		74		3

Investment in subsidiaries		3,356		3,109		3,632		3,356

Other assets		55		49		41		55

TOTAL ASSETS	$	3,737	$	3,480	$	4,013	$	3,737

LIABILITIES:

Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	148	$	116	$	258	$	148

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption	$	3,589	$	3,364	$	3,755	$	3,589

TOTAL LIABILITIES	$	3,737	$	3,480	$	4,013	$	3,737

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P., as well as the accompanying Note to the Parent Company Only Financial Statements of The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P.

9092

Schedule I

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

(Parent Company Only)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME


	For the Years Ended December 31,									For the Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2018			2021			2020			2019
NET REVENUE
Subsidiary earnings	$	1,271		$	1,064		$	970		$	1,593		$	1,271		$	1,064
Management fee income		1,852			1,411			99			2,395			1,852			1,411
Other		15			29			22			13			15			29

Total revenue		3,138			2,504			1,091			4,001			3,138			2,504

Interest expense		93			94			67			92			93			94

Net revenue		3,045			2,410			1,024			3,909			3,045			2,410

OPERATING EXPENSES
Compensation and benefits		1,759			1,317			33			2,303			1,759			1,317
Other operating expenses		1			1			1			1			1			1

Total operating expenses		1,760			1,318			34			2,304			1,760			1,318

INCOME BEFORE ALLOCATIONS TO PARTNERS	$	1,285		$	1,092		$	990		$	1,605		$	1,285		$	1,092

Allocations to partners		(1,285	)		(1,092	)		(990	)		(1,605	)		(1,285	)		(1,092	)

NET INCOME	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0		$	0		$	0

9193

Schedule I

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

(Parent Company Only)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	For the Years Ended December 31,									For the Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2020			2019			2018			2021			2020			2019
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0		$	0		$	0
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Income before allocations to partners		1,285			1,092			990			1,605			1,285			1,092
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Investment in subsidiaries		(1	)		(513	)		(134	)		(71	)		(1	)		(513	)
Investment securities		(247	)		5			—			(276	)		(247	)		5
Other assets		(6	)		(16	)		(14	)		14			(6	)		(16	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		—			1			1			1			0			1
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,031			569			843			1,273			1,031			569

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Repayments of partnership loans											17			0			0
Issuance of partnership interests		50			432			60			66			50			432
Redemption of partnership interests		(214	)		(216	)		(199	)		(260	)		(214	)		(216	)
Distributions from partnership capital		(864	)		(783	)		(694	)		(1,153	)		(864	)		(783	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,028	)		(567	)		(833	)		(1,330	)		(1,028	)		(567	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		3			2			10
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents											(57	)		3			2

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

Beginning of year		320			318			308			323			320			318
End of year	$	323		$	320		$	318		$	266		$	323		$	320

NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:

Issuance of general partnership interests through partnership loans in current year	$	163		$	164		$	170		$	222		$	163		$	164
Repayment of partnership loans through distributions from partnership capital in current year	$	182		$	136		$	135		$	225		$	182		$	136
Declaration of distributions from subsidiary in current year but received after year end	$	474		$	428		$	56		$	434		$	474		$	428
Declared distributions for retired partnership capital in current year but unpaid at year end	$	145		$	109		$	97
Declared distributions for retired partnership capital in current year but unpaid at year-end										$	254		$	145		$	109

9294

Schedule I

THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.

Note to Parent Company Only Financial Statements

NOTE 1 – REVENUE AND EXPENSE

Beginning in 2019, the Partnership’s principal operating subsidiary, Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (“Edward Jones”), has a written agreement with The Jones Financial Companies, L.L.L.P. (“JFC”) for the services of certain financial advisors who are service partners of JFC and not employees of Edward Jones. Pursuant to the agreement, Edward Jones made payments to the service partners of JFC on JFC's behalf for those services provided. This arrangement did not have an impact on net income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019 but resulted in higher management fee income of ~~$1.7~~$2.3 billion, $1.7 billion and ~~$1.3~~$1.3 billion, respectively, offset by higher compensation expense of ~~$1.7~~$2.3 billion, $1.7 billion and ~~$1.3~~$1.3 billion, respectively.


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
None	N/A	N/A


		Page
PART I

Item 1	Business	3
Item 1A	Risk Factors	1315
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	2730
Item 2	Properties	2730
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	2730
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	2730

PART II

Item 5	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	2830
Item 6	~~Selected Financial Data~~[Reserved]	2830
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2931
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	4446
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	4547
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	7476
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	7476
Item 9B	Other Information	7476
Item 9C	Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections	76
~~PART III~~
PART III
~~Item 10~~
Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	7577
Item 11	Executive Compensation	8083
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	8285
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	8286
Item 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	8487

PART IV

Item 15	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	8588
Item 16	Form 10-K Summary	8589
	Signatures	8991


	Partnership's 2025 Goals			Actuals as of December 31, 2021
Partnership Diversity (US & Canada):
Financial Advisors:
People of Color		15	%		9	%
Women		30	%		22	%
Home Office General Partners:
People of Color		15	%		12	%
Women		40	%		31	%
Leaders Across Home Office:
People of Color		20	%		17	%
Women		50	%		49	%


Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐
Emerging growth company	☐


($ millions)	2020				2019				2018					2021				2020				2019
Fee revenue
Asset-based fees	$	7,515	74	%	$	6,778	71	%	$	6,075		71	%	$	9,737	79	%	$	7,515	74	%	$	6,778	71	%
Account and activity fees		660	6	%		674	7	%		678		8	%		687	5	%		660	6	%		674	7	%
Total fee revenue		8,175	80	%		7,452	78	%		6,753		79	%		10,424	84	%		8,175	80	%		7,452	78	%
Trade revenue		1,719	17	%		1,581	17	%		1,462		17	%		1,719	14	%		1,719	17	%		1,581	17	%
Interest and dividends		207	2	%		416	4	%		362		4	%		167	1	%		207	2	%		416	4	%
Other revenue		64	1	%		77	1	%		17	<1
Other revenue, net															63	1	%		64	1	%		77	1	%
Total revenue	$	10,165	100	%	$	9,526	100	%	$	8,594		100	%	$	12,373	100	%	$	10,165	100	%	$	9,526	100	%

	For the years ended December 31,
($ millions, except per unit information and units outstanding)	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016

Net revenue	$	10,063	$	9,369	$	8,469	$	7,506	$	6,557

Income before allocations to partners	$	1,285	$	1,092	$	990	$	872	$	746

Income allocated to limited partners per weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited partnership unit outstanding	$	147.81	$	132.22	$	128.13	$	121.15	$	110.55

Weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited partnership units outstanding		1,242,781		1,256,459		889,502		896,566		908,919

	As of December 31,
($ millions)	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016

Total assets	$	28,320	$	19,317	$	15,815	$	17,176	$	19,424

Other liabilities exclusive of partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption	$	24,731	$	15,953	$	12,960	$	14,381	$	16,790

Partnership capital subject to mandatory redemption		3,589		3,364		2,855		2,795		2,634

Total liabilities	$	28,320	$	19,317	$	15,815	$	17,176	$	19,424


	As of December 31, 2021
	Limited Partnership Interests			Subordinated Limited Partnership Interests			General Partnership Interests			Total Partnership Capital
Total Partnership capital(1)	$	1,225		$	581		$	1,750		$	3,556
Partnership capital owned by partners with individual loans	$	121		$	—		$	829		$	950
Partnership capital owned by partners with individual loans as a percent of total Partnership capital		10	%		0	%		47	%		27	%

Individual loans:
Individual bank loans	$	27		$	—		$	—		$	27
Individual Partnership loans		—			—			321			321
Total individual loans	$	27		$	—		$	321		$	348
Individual loans as a percent of total Partnership capital		2	%		0	%		18	%		10	%
Individual loans as a percent of respective Partnership capital owned by partners with loans		22	%		—			39	%		37	%

	As of December 31, 2020
	Limited Partnership Interests			Subordinated Limited Partnership Interests			General Partnership Interests			Total Partnership Capital
Total Partnership capital⁽¹⁾	$	1,237		$	539		$	1,640		$	3,416
Partnership capital owned by partners with individual loans	$	244		$	1		$	839		$	1,084
Partnership capital owned by partners with individual loans as a percent of total Partnership capital		20	%		0	%		51	%		32	%

Individual loans:
Individual bank loans	$	63		$	—		$	—		$	63
Individual Partnership loans		—			1			340			341
Total individual loans	$	63		$	1		$	340		$	404
Individual loans as a percent of total Partnership capital		5	%		0	%		21	%		12	%
Individual loans as a percent of respective Partnership capital owned by partners with loans		26	%		100	%		41	%		37	%

	Payments Due by Period
	2021		2022		2023		2024		2025		Thereafter		Total
Rental commitments	$	213	$	58	$	33	$	18	$	9	$	11	$	342


	2021		2020
Deposit for Canadian retirement accounts	$	459	$	457
Fees from mutual funds and insurance companies		335		285
Other receivables		56		76
Total	$	850	$	818

	December 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
2021	$	300	$	283
2022		247		239
2023		190		183
2024		125		128
2025		65		65
Thereafter		60		63
Total lease payments		987		961
Less: Interest		49		63
Total present value of lease liabilities	$	938	$	898

	Financial Assets at Fair Value as of
	December 31, 2020
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Cash equivalents:
Certificates of deposit	$	—	$	120	$	—	$	120
Money market funds	41			—		—	41
Total cash equivalents	$	41	$	120	$	—	$	161

Investments segregated under federal regulations:
U.S. treasuries	$	12,051	$	—	$	—	$	12,051
Certificates of deposit		—		100		—		100
Total investments segregated under federal regulations	$	12,051	$	100	$	—	$	12,151

Securities owned:
Investment securities:
Government and agency obligations	$	971	$	—	$	—	$	971
Mutual funds⁽¹⁾		327		—		—		327
Equities		3		—		—		3
Certificates of deposit		—		1		—		1
Total investment securities	$	1,301	$	1	$	—	$	1,302

Inventory securities:
Equities	$	19	$	—	$	—	$	19
State and municipal obligations		—		10		—		10
Corporate bonds and notes		—		2		—		2
Mutual funds		1		—		—		1
Total inventory securities	$	20	$	12	$	—	$	32

	2020 Quarters Ended
	Mar 27		Jun 26		Sep 25		Dec 31
Net revenue	$	2,491	$	2,325	$	2,527	$	2,720
Income before allocations to partners	$	303	$	288	$	316	$	378
Income allocated to limited partners per weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited partnership unit outstanding	$	34.90	$	33.10	$	36.36	$	43.45

	2019 Quarters Ended
	Mar 29		Jun 28		Sep 27		Dec 31
Net revenue	$	2,190	$	2,319	$	2,367	$	2,493
Income before allocations to partners	$	241	$	285	$	281	$	285
Income allocated to limited partners per weighted average $1,000 equivalent limited partnership unit outstanding	$	29.20	$	34.55	$	33.93	$	34.54


		Executive	General			Enterprise	General
Name	Age	Committee	Partner	Area of Responsibility	Age	Leadership Team	Partner	Area of Responsibility
Penny Pennington	57	2014	2006	Managing Partner	58	2014	2006	Managing Partner
Andrew T. Miedler					44	2021	2011	Chief Financial Officer
Kevin D. Bastien	55	2010	1998	Chief Financial Officer	56	2010	1998	Chief Strategy Officer
Kenneth R. Cella, Jr.	51	2014	2002	Client Strategies Group	52	2014	2002	Branch Development
Thomas P. Curran	60	2019	2006	Branch Development
Lisa Dolan	54	2020	2007	Chief Operating Officer
Lisa M. Dolan					55	2020	2007	Chief Operating Officer
Tina M. Hrevus					55	2021	2012	Managing Partner's Chief of Staff
Kristin M. Johnson	49	2019	2006	Human Resources	50	2019	2006	Chief Human Resources Officer and Chief Transformation Officer
Francis T. LaQuinta					58	2021	2016	Chief Information Officer
Christopher N. Lewis	54	2019	2007	General Counsel	55	2019	2007	General Counsel
Timothy A. Rea					53	2021	2016	Chief Marketing Officer
Wayne A. Roberts					50	2021	2008	Head of Business Segments


						Income
				Deferred		Allocated
	Year	Salaries		Compensation		to Partners(1)			Total
Penny Pennington	2021	$	250,000	$	14,906	$	22,302,931	��	$	22,567,837
CEO	2020		250,000		14,165		17,750,493			18,014,658
	2019		250,000		12,992		14,411,114			14,674,106
Andrew T. Miedler	2021	$	175,000	$	14,906	$	8,471,817		$	8,661,723
CFO
Kevin D. Bastien	2021	$	175,000	$	14,906	$	21,275,725		$	21,465,631
General Partner - Firm Strategy	2020		175,000		14,165		16,857,259			17,046,424
	2019		175,000		12,992		14,036,151			14,224,143
Kenneth R. Cella, Jr.	2021	$	175,000	$	14,906	$	20,524,505		$	20,714,411
General Partner - Client Strategies Group	2020		175,000		14,165		16,439,406			16,628,570
	2019		175,000		12,992		12,951,990			13,139,982
Kristin M. Johnson	2021	$	175,000	$	14,906	$	15,458,570		$	15,648,476
General Partner – Human Resources and Transformation