Table of Contents

iii

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors and Executive Officers

Our directors and executive officers, and certain information about each of them as of April 26, 2024 are set forth below.

Executive Officers

Rishi Bajaj has served as our Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”) beginning in April 2024 and was appointed Chairperson in April 2024, in each case, effective upon the closing of the Asset Sale. Mr. Bajaj has served as a director of our Company since November 2023. Since 2009, Mr. Bajaj has served as the President and Chief Investment Officer of Altai Capital Management L.P., an investment firm, and is responsible for the management and operation of its investment management business. Prior to founding Altai Capital in 2009, Mr. Bajaj held positions at Silver Point Capital, L.P., a global credit investment company, and Gleacher Partners, LLC, a private equity firm. Mr. Bajaj previously served on the boards of directors of MobileIron, Inc., a technology company, from April 2020 until its sale in December 2020 and ServiceSource International, Inc., a recurring revenue and customer success management software and services company, from November 2014 to May 2016. Mr. Bajaj graduated from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania with a B.S. in Economics. We believe that Mr. Bajaj is qualified to serve on the Board due to his unique insights and perspective into the Company’s future strategy and his experience in investment management.

Brett Just became our Chief Financial Officer in April 2024, effective upon the closing of the Asset Sale. Mr. Just has served as our Chief Accounting Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance since March 2023. Mr. Just served as Interim co-Chief Financial Officer from June to October 2021. Mr. Just joined the Company as an Assistant Controller in September 2017 and was promoted to Corporate Controller in August 2019 and to Chief Accounting Officer in November 2020. Mr. Just was previously the Controller for the Internet of Things (IOT) Business Unit at Cisco Systems, Inc., a technology company, from 2016 to 2017 and Assistant Controller for Jasper Wireless, a technology company, from 2013 to 2016, prior to its acquisition by Cisco in March 2016. Mr. Just graduated from UCLA with a B.S. in Business Economics.

Joanna Forster has served as our General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer since August 2023. Ms. Forster originally joined the Company in March 2021 as Associate General Counsel and was elevated to Chief Compliance Officer in April 2022. Previously, Ms. Forster served as a Deputy Attorney General at the California Department of Justice. Prior to her public service, she was an associate at Latham & Watkins, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, and Jones Day, which are international law firms, where she handled a wide range of litigation matters, including antitrust, securities, and consumer deception cases. Ms. Forster was a Law Clerk to the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall of the Central District of California. Ms. Forster holds both a J.D. and a B.A. in Political Science and Government from the University of California, Berkeley.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS1

Non-Employee Directors

Michael Farlekas has served on our Board of Directors since the closing of the Asset Sale in April 2024. Mr. Farlekas has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Onit, Inc., a provider of legal workflow software and solutions, since January 2024. Prior to serving in that role, he served as the Chief Executive Officer of E2open, LLC, a provider of cloud-based, on-demand supply chain and execution software, from May 2015 to October 2023. Prior to serving in that role, Mr. Farlekas held positions at Roadnet Technologies, Inc., a provider of fleet management software solutions for private fleets, from 2012 to 2014 and RedPrairie Corporation, a provider of warehouse management solutions from 2001 to 2012. Mr. Farlekas graduated from Fairleigh Dickinson University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and from Jacksonville University with an M.B.A. in International Business. We believe that Mr. Farlekas is qualified to serve as member of our Board due to his 20 years of experience in executive leadership for enterprise software companies.

Marshall Heinberg has served on our Board of Directors since the closing of the Asset Sale in April 2024. Mr. Heinberg is the founder and has served as the managing director of MAH Associates, LLC, a provider of strategic advisory and consulting services to companies evaluating financing and strategic alternatives, since 2012. He has also served as the chair of the board of directors of Custom Truck One Source, Inc., a single-source provider of specialized truck and heavy equipment solutions including sales, rentals, and financing, since April 2021 and as a director of Union Carbide Corporation, a subsidiary of Dow Inc, since July 2019. Previously, Mr. Heinberg served as the chair of the board of directors of PAE, Inc., an operational support services company, from February 2020 to February 2022 and on the boards of directors of Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a clinical-stage life sciences company, from October 2018 to June 2022 and ChannelAdvisor Corporation, an e-commerce company, from December 2019 to November 2022. Further, Mr. Heinberg previously served as the chair of the board of directors of Ecology and Environment, Inc., a subsidiary of WSP Global, Inc., from June 2017 to January 2020, as a director of Universal Biosensors, Inc., a world leader in electrochemical cell technology, from July 2010 to March 2021 and as an advisor to Burford Capital Limited, a legal finance products and services company, from July 2015 to July 2020. Mr. Heinberg began his investment banking career in 1987 in the corporate finance division of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., an international bank, and served as head of the investment banking department and as a senior managing director of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. from 2008 until 2012. Mr. Heinberg also served as the head of U.S. investment banking of CIBC World Markets, an international bank, from 2001 until 2008. Mr. Heinberg graduated from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania with a B.S. in Economics and from Fordham University School of Law with a J.D. We believe that Mr. Heinberg is qualified to serve as a member of our Board due to his 35 years of extensive experience in capital markets as well as his business and financial experience in complex and related industries.

Elizabeth LaPuma has served on our Board of Directors since the closing of the Asset Sale in April 2024. Ms. LaPuma most recently served as the Head of the Balance Sheet Advisory Group at UBS Group AG, serving as a Managing Director, from January 2020 to July 2023, particularly focused on representing financial institutions. She also ran Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC’s Asset Management Services group, from July 2013 to January 2020, managing a portfolio of assets including a portfolio of debt and equity investments and international assets. Prior to that, Ms. LaPuma worked in the Financial Advisory Group of BlackRock, Inc., as well as at Lazard, Inc., the global investment bank. Ms. LaPuma has sat on the boards of directors of WeWork Inc., a public, workspace provider company, since August 2023; Digital Media Solutions, Inc., a public, technology-enabled advertising company, since September 2023; Ebix, Inc., a public, software as a service for financial institutions company, since October 2023; and several private companies across several industries. Ms LaPuma previously served on the board of directors of Surgalign Holdings Inc., a global medical technology company, from June to its sale in July 2023. Ms. LaPuma graduated from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania with a B.S. in Finance and an M.B.A. and from The School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania with a B.A. in International Relations. We believe that Ms. LaPuma is qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors due to her 20 years of experience advising on and structuring complex financial transactions, including securities offerings, mergers and acquisitions, and restructurings.

Richard Parisi has served on our Board of Directors since the closing of the Asset Sale in April 2024. Mr. Parisi is the founder and managing partner of Catania Capital Partners LLC, an investment firm formed in September 2020 focused on private equity and other junior capital investments across a range of industries, including telecom, media & technology, financial services and gaming. Prior to serving in that role, Mr. Parisi served as a senior investment professional at Silver Point Capital, L.P. from June 2005 to September 2020. He currently serves as the chairman of the board of directors of American Broadband Holding Company (d/b/a Fastwyre Broadband), a private broadband, video and voice service provider and a portfolio company of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, and Catania Capital. Mr. Parisi previously served on the board of directors of iPCS, a publicly traded telecom company that was ultimately sold to Sprint Nextel Corporation, from 2006 to 2007, and as the chairman of the board of directors of Affinity Gaming, a locally focused casino operator with properties in Nevada, Missouri, Iowa and Colorado, from 2013 to 2015. Mr. Parisi graduated from Duke University with a B.A. in Chemistry and Economics and received his M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. We believe that Mr. Parisi is qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors due to his 25 years of investment and transaction experience.

This2

Board Overview

The Board of Directors may establish the authorized number of directors from time to time by resolution. The Board of Directors currently consists of five members. Our directors hold office until their successors have been elected and qualified or appointed, or the earlier of their death, resignation or removal. The Board of Directors is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and our Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that only the Board of Directors Board can fill vacant directorships, subject to any special rights of holders of preferred stock. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors would be distributed pro rata among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class would consist of one-third of the authorized number of directors.

Upon the completion of the Asset Sale, several individuals departed from the Board of Directors, and several individuals joined the Board of Directors. For more information on management changes that took effect upon completion of the Asset Sale, see the section below titled “Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance—Directors and Executive Officers—Management Prior to the Completion of the Asset Sale.” The following table sets forth the current members of the Board of Directors, the class to which he or she belongs and when such director’s term expires:

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Management Prior to the Completion of the Asset Sale

As disclosed in our Current Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements8-K filed with the SEC on April 23, 2023, our management changed in connection with the completion of the Asset Sale. In particular, upon completion of the Asset Sale on April 26, 2024:

3

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Information Regarding the Board of Directors and its Committees

As required under Nasdaq listing standards, our independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present. During fiscal year 2023, our Board held twelve (12) meetings and there were five (5) Audit Committee meetings, four (4) Compensation Committee meetings, and four (4) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meetings.

The following table provides current membership information for each of our Board committees:

Name

Independent

Audit

Compensation

Nominating and Corporate Governance

Rishi Bajaj(1)

Michael Farlekas

Marshall Heinberg

Elizabeth LaPuma

Richard Parisi

Committee Chair

Board Diversity Matrix

4

Below is a description of each Committee of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees meets the applicable rules and regulations regarding “independence” and also that each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is free of any relationship that would interfere with his or her individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to Company matters.

Audit Committee

Since the completion of the Asset Sale in April 2024, the members of our Audit Committee have been Messrs. Heinberg and Parisi and Ms. LaPuma, each of whom can read and understand fundamental financial statements. Each is independent under the rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of Nasdaq applicable to audit committee members. Mr. Parisi chairs the Audit Committee. Our Board of Directors determined that Messrs. Heinberg and Parisi and Ms. LaPuma each qualified as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of Section 27ASEC regulations and meets the financial sophistication requirements of Nasdaq.

Prior to the completion of the Securities ActAsset Sale, the members of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"),our Audit Committee were Mses. Bradley and Section 21ETilenius, and Mr. Kutscher, each of whom can read and understand fundamental financial statements. During their service to the Audit Committee, each was independent under the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), which involve substantial risks and uncertainties regarding future events and future results. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts such as information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations and expenses, business strategies and plans, competitive position, business environment and potential growth strategies and opportunities. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “foresees,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “goals,” “may,” “might,” “outlook,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “targets,” “will,” “would” or similar expressionsSEC and the negativeslisting standards of Nasdaq applicable to audit committee members. Ms. Bradley chaired the Audit Committee. Our Board of Directors determined that Mses. Bradley and Tilenius each qualified as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of SEC regulations and meets the financial sophistication requirements of Nasdaq.

Our Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors’ oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial statements; our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the qualifications, independence, and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm; the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting; and risk assessment and risk management. Among other matters, our Audit Committee’s responsibilities include:

To fulfill the above obligations, our Audit Committee relies on: management for the preparation and accuracy of the Company’s financial statements; both management and the Company’s internal audit function for establishing effective internal controls and procedures to ensure the Company’s compliance with accounting standards, financial reporting procedures, and applicable laws and regulations; and the Company’s independent registered public

5

accounting firm for unbiased, diligent audit or review, as applicable, of the Company’s financial statements and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The members of the Audit Committee are not employees of the Company and are not responsible for conducting the audit or performing other accounting procedures.

Our Audit Committee charter can be found on the “Corporate Governance” section of our investor relations website at ir.contextlogicinc.com. The Audit Committee held five (5) meetings during 2023. Each member of the Audit Committee attended all of the Audit Committee meetings.

Compensation Committee

Since the completion of the Asset Sale in April 2024, the members of our Compensation Committee have been Messrs. Farlekas and Parisi and Ms. LaPuma. Mr. Farlekas chairs our Compensation Committee. Each member of our Compensation Committee is: (i) independent under the rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of Nasdaq applicable to Compensation Committee members; (ii) a “non-employee director,” as defined in Rule 16b-3 adopted under Section 16 of the Exchange Act; and (iii) an “outside director” under Regulation Section 1.162-27 adopted under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Prior to the completion of the Asset Sale, the members of our Compensation Committee were Ms. Tilenius who was appointed to the Compensation Committee in February 2023 and Messrs. Syed, Tung, and Bajaj who was appointed to the Compensation Committee in November 2023. Mr. Syed chaired our Compensation Committee. During their tenure on the Compensation Committee, each member of our Compensation Committee was: (i) independent under the rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of Nasdaq applicable to Compensation Committee members; (ii) a “non-employee director,” as defined in Rule 16b-3 adopted under Section 16 of the Exchange Act; and (iii) an “outside director” under Regulation Section 1.162-27 adopted under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Our Compensation Committee assists the Board of Directors with its oversight of the compensation of our executive officers and directors, and administers compensation and incentive plans for employees and other service providers. Among other matters, our Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include:

Our Compensation Committee charter can be found on our investor relations website at ir.contextlogicinc.com. Our Compensation Committee held four (4) meetings and acted by written consent four (4) times during 2023. Each member of our Compensation Committee attended all of the Compensation Committee meetings. Mr. Yan, our former Chief Executive Officer, did not participate in the determination of his own compensation or the compensation of directors when he was serving as Chief Executive Officer, but made recommendations to our Compensation Committee regarding the amount and form of the compensation of the other executive officers and key employees. Mr. Bajaj, our current Chief Executive Officer, does not participate in the determination of his own compensation or the compensation of directors. However, Mr. Bajaj makes recommendations to our Compensation Committee regarding the amount and form of the compensation of the other executive officers and key employees, and Mr. Bajaj participates in our Compensation Committee’s deliberations about their compensation. Other than our Chief Financial Officer, Brett Just, and our General Counsel, Joanna Forster, neither of whom participates with respect to their own respective compensation, no other executive officers participate in the determination of the amount or form of the compensation of executive officers or directors.

6

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Since the completion of the Asset Sale in April 2024, the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have been Messrs. Heinberg and Farlekas. Mr. Heinberg chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Each member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent as currently defined under Nasdaq listing standards.

Prior to the completion of the Asset Sale in April 2024, the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were Messrs. Syed and Tung. Ms. Tilenius transitioned from the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to the Compensation Committee in February 2023. Mr. Syed chaired the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. During their terms of service to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was independent as currently defined under Nasdaq listing standards.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists our Board of Directors with its oversight of and identification of individuals qualified to become members of our Board, consistent with criteria approved by our Board, and selects, or recommends that our Board selects, director nominees, develops and recommends to our Board a set of corporate governance guidelines, and oversees the evaluation of our Board. Among other matters, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include:

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter can be found on our investor relations website at ir.contextlogicinc.com. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four (4) meetings during 2023. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee attended all of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meetings, except for Mr. Tung, who missed one (1) meeting.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the minimum qualifications and skills that candidates for director should possess include: (i) the highest professional and personal ethics and values, (ii) a commitment to enhancing stockholder value, and (iii) sufficient time to carry out their duties and to provide insight and practical wisdom based on experience. The Committee also considers the following factors, in no particular order of importance: (i) various and relevant career experience, (ii) relevant skills, such as an understanding of the Company’s business and technology, (iii) financial expertise, (iv) diversity, and (v) local and community ties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retains the right to modify these qualifications from time to time.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, diversity is one of several critical factors considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee when evaluating the composition of our Board of Directors, amongst other selection criteria. We consider various diversity factors when considering director candidates, including race, ethnicity, gender, age, professional experience, national origin, and geography. We believe each director contributes to our Board’s overall diversity by providing a variety of perspectives based on distinct personal and professional experiences and backgrounds.

We are committed to enhancing the diversity of our Board of Directors and in furtherance of this, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will conduct annual self-evaluations to assess its performance and effectiveness, which we currentlyexpect will include its consideration of diversity and other selection criteria.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders and evaluate them using the same criteria as candidates identified by our Board or the Committee for consideration. If a stockholder of the Company wishes to recommend a director candidate for consideration by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the stockholder recommendation should be delivered to the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company, and must include information regarding the candidate and the stockholder making the recommendation.

7

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors represents our stockholders and the Board’s primary purpose is to build long-term stockholder value. Our Board of Directors also believes it is important to determine a board leadership structure that ensures the independent oversight of management as our Company continues to grow. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board of Directors is not required to separate the offices of the chairperson and the chief executive officer but may do so if it deems it advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. As of the completion of the Asset Sale, Mr. Bajaj has served as both our CEO and Board Chairperson. Our Board believes that this combination is in the best interests of us and our stockholders because by serving as both our CEO and Board Chairperson, Mr. Bajaj has a dual perspective into the responsibilities of each role and a comprehensive view of our strategic goals which allows us to make decisions more quickly and efficiently.

Our Lead Independent Director is responsible for conducting sessions with the independent directors as part of every Board of Directors meeting and chairing all meetings of the independent directors. With Mr. Bajaj’s appointment as Board Chairperson, Mr. Farlekas became our Lead Independent Director in April 2024. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Lead Independent Director facilitates communication between management, the independent directors and the Chairperson of the Board, actively participates in setting the agenda for Board meetings, presides at executive session of the Board of Directors and performs such other duties as specified by the Board of Directors.

We believe this structure of a separate Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer, combined with a Lead Independent Director, if and when necessary, results in an effective balancing of responsibilities, and is the optimal structure for overseeing the strategic direction and leadership of the Company while also ensuring effective communication among Board members.

Risk Oversight Management

Our Board of Directors provides risk oversight for the Company by receiving management presentations, including risk assessments, from all functional areas of the Company, and discussing these assessments with management. In particular, our Board of Directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure. Our executive officers are involved cannot be predictedresponsible for the day-to-day management of the material risks we face. The risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from Board committees and members of senior management to enable our Board of Directors to understand our risk identification, risk management, and risk mitigation strategies with certainty, we dorespect to areas of potential material risk, including operations, finance, legal, regulatory, cyber security, strategic, and reputational risk. Our Board of Directors administers its oversight function directly as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of our Board of Directors that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. Our Board of Directors has delegated responsibility related to certain risks to the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

The Audit Committee discusses with management and our independent registered public accounting firm our risk management guidelines and policies, our major financial risk exposures, and the steps needed or taken to monitor and control such exposures. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has primary responsibility to oversee risks related to Board structure and composition, and corporate governance. Our Compensation Committee oversees risks related to our compensation programs, and discusses with management its annual assessment of employee compensation policies and programs. Based upon this review, our Compensation Committee believes that any risks arising from such policies and practices are not believe that there is a reasonable possibility that the final outcome of these matters willreasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company in the future. Specifically, we believe that the elements of our businesscompensation program do not encourage unnecessary or financial results. Regardlessexcessive risk taking. Base salaries are fixed in amount, and thus do not encourage risk taking. A significant proportion of the final outcome, however, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, harmcompensation provided to our reputationexecutives, and brand,a material amount of the compensation provided to other employees, is in the form of long-term equity awards that are important to help further align employee interests with those of our stockholders. We do not believe that these awards encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking because the ultimate value of the awards is tied to our stock price, and other factors.because awards are subject to long-term vesting schedules to help ensure that employees have significant value tied to long-term stock price performance.

See Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for further discussion8

Stockholder Communications with our Board of risks relatedDirectors

Stockholders wishing to legal proceedings. See also, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies, “Legal Contingencies and Proceedings,” for further discussioncommunicate with our Board of current litigation.    

Human Capital

We are continually investing in the engagement and retentionDirectors or with an individual member of our global workforceBoard of Directors may do so by creating an inclusive workplace, providing market-competitive benefitswriting to support our employees’ health and well-being, and fostering a learning environment in supportBoard of their growth and development. As of December 31, 2021, we had a total of 1218 full-time employees worldwide, of which 793 are inDirectors or to the US.

We also engage temporary employees and consultants as needed to support our operations. Noneparticular member of our employeesBoard of Directors, care of the General Counsel and Secretary by mail to our principal executive offices, Attention: General Counsel and Secretary. The front of the envelope should indicate that it contains stockholder communication. All clearly marked written communications, other than unsolicited advertising or promotional materials, are logged and copied, and forwarded to the director(s) to whom the communication was addressed. Please note that the foregoing communication procedure does not apply to: (i) stockholder proposals pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 and communications made in connection with such proposals, (ii) stockholder notice pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-19 and communications made in connection with such notice, or (iii) service of process or any other notice in a legal proceeding.

Meetings of the United States are represented by a labor union or subject to a collective bargaining agreement. In certain countries in which we operate, we may be subject to, and need to comply with, local labor law requirements which may automatically make our employees subject to industry-wide collective bargaining agreements. We may be required to comply with the termsBoard of these collective bargaining agreements. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we consider our relations with our employees to be good.

Diversity and InclusionDirectors

Our Board of Directors met twelve (12) times during 2023. Each member of our Board of Directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of our Board of Directors and of the Committees on which he or she served, held during the period for which such member was a Director or Committee Member. Members of our Board of Directors also consulted informally with management from time to time and our Board of Directors acted by written consent four (4) times during 2023. While we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our Board of Directors at our annual meetings of stockholders, all directors are encouraged to attend our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. At our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, all of our then-serving directors were in attendance.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines to ensure that our Board of Directors has the necessary practices in place to review and evaluate ContextLogic Inc.’s business operations and long-term strategy. The corporate governance guidelines set forth the practices our Board of Directors follows with respect to board and corporate governance, including board leadership, evaluating management’s performance and compensation, formulating company strategy, overseeing risk management and legal and ethical compliance, and managing potential conflicts of interest, among other responsibilities. The corporate governance guidelines, as well as the charters for each committee of our board of directors, are posted on our website.

Corporate Responsibility

We are committed to creating and maintaining a workplace free from discrimination or harassment on the basis of race, color, citizenship, religion, creed, national origin, ancestry, gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran status, disability, medical condition, or any other status protected by applicable law. Our global employment policies and compliance trainings prohibit such discrimination and harassment. Our management team and employees are also expected to exhibit and promote honest, ethical, and respectful conduct in the workplace. All ofMoreover, we believe our employees must adhere to a code of business conduct and ethics that sets standards for appropriate behavior and are required to attend annual training on the code of business conduct and ethics.

Employee Development and Training

Our values-based culture is a critical component ofto our success. Oursuccess and our employees are critical to the success of our company, and weCompany. We strive to create a supportive environment, where theyemployees can contribute, learn, and grow in their careers. Our culture promotes feedback, where we seek divergent points of view so that healthy debate can drive strong decision making. We encourage a culture where everyone feels a sense of agency and can contribute to the success of the company. We foster opportunities for our employees to grow in both formal and informal learning environments, inside and outside of the Company. We prioritizeCompany also prioritizes employee development and training, which we believe has a direct impact on employee growth, engagement, and retention. To continue to support managers and individual contributors at Wish, most of whom work remotely due to the on-going COVID-19 pandemic,Additionally, we provide virtual training and development opportunities. We also support the well-being of our employees by providing regular mental health breaks and wellness benefits to support their overall health and ongoing well-being. We continue

Code of Conduct and Ethics

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics, which applies to optimize our organizational efficiency and collaboration by providing training on strengthening communication skills and leading effective meetings. We believe that employee development is a shared responsibility of employee and manager, and through both formal and informal methods, we strive to build trust and encourage knowledge sharing and mentorship. We have a robust talent calibration and succession planning process designed to assess our top talent and identify any skills gaps with development plans.

Flexibility and Decentralization

While we have distributed teams collaborating around the world, the COVID-19 pandemic pivoted the vast majorityall of our employees, officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, and directors. We also expect our contractors, consultants, suppliers, agents, and other third parties to work from home starting March 2020. Despite the easingfollow our Code of governmental stay-at-home mandates,Conduct and Ethics in the first quarter of 2022, we made a decision to shift towards a primarily remote working environment in which most employees will have the option to work from home even after we reopen our offices. We believe this flexible location policy will unlock further opportunities to source, connect, and hire talent in more locations as well as enable us to retain talent, as employees can continue toconnection with their work for Wish if they need or want to relocate.

Information about Segment and Geographic Areas

us. The segment and geographic information required herein is contained in Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated in the state of Delaware in June 2010 as ContextLogic Inc., d/b/a “Wish.” Our principal executive offices are located at One Sansome Street 33rd Floor, San Francisco, California 94104. Our telephone number is (415) 432-7323. Our website address is www.wish.com.

We use various trademarks, trade names, and design marks in our business, including Wish^™, Wish Shopping Made Fun^™, W^™, WishPost^™, Wish Pickup^™, Wish Local^™, ProductBoost^™, and ContextLogic^™. This annual report also contains trademarks and trade names of other businesses that are the property of their respective holders. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trademarks and trade names to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, these other companies.

Available Information

We file our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K with the SEC electronically. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including ContextLogic Inc. that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is https://www.sec.gov.

You may obtain a free copyfull text of our annual reportsCode of Conduct and Ethics is posted on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, andinvestor relations website at ir.contextlogicinc.com. We intend to disclose future amendments to, those reports on our website at http://www.wish.com under the Investor Relations section. Such reports and other information are available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Our Corporate Governance Standards, the charterswaivers, of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as well as our Worldwide Code of Business Conduct are also available on our website. Information on our website is not, and will not be deemed, a part of this report or incorporated into any other filings the Company makes with the SEC.

Investors and others should note that we announce material financial and operational information to our investors using our Investor Relations website (https://ir.wish.com), press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. We also use the following channels to provide updates to the public about our business, activities, and other related matters, which could be deemed to be material information: www.twitter.com/WishShopping and www.linkedin.com/company/wishshopping. Information contained on or accessible through our websites are neither a part of nor incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC, and any references to our websites and the inclusion of our website addresses in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our Class A common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before deciding whether to purchase shares of our Class A common stock, you should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and all of the other information in this report. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be adversely affected. As a result, the price of our Class A common stock could decline and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Our efforts to acquire new users and engage existing users may not be successful or may be more costly than we expect, which could prevent us from maintaining or increasing our revenue.

Our success depends on our ability to attract new users and engage existing users in a cost-effective manner. In order to acquire and engage users, we must, among other things, promote and sustain our platform and provide high-quality products, user experiences, and service. Our marketing efforts currently include various initiatives and consist primarily of digital marketing on a variety of social media channels, suchEthics as Facebook, search engine optimization on websites, such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo!, various branding strategies, such as our relationship with social influencers, and mobile “push” notifications, text messaging, and email. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we spent $1.1 billion, $1.7 billion and $1.5 billion on sales and marketing, representing 53%, 67% and 77% of our revenue, respectively. We anticipate that sales and marketing expenses will continue to comprise a substantial majority of our overall operating costs for the foreseeable future. We have historically acquired a significant number of our users through digital advertising on platforms and websites owned by Facebook and Google, which may terminate their agreements with us anytime. Our investments in sales and marketing may not effectively reach potential users, potential users may decide not to buy through us, or user spend on our platform may not yield the intended return on investment, any of which could negatively affect our financial results.

In addition, in 2021, we faced the headwinds of reduced retention and new buyer conversion and a rise in digital advertising costs. In response to rising digital advertising costs, which contributed to lower marketing efficiency, starting in the third quarter of 2021, we decided to significantly reduce our digital advertising expenditures as we focused our resources on other strategic initiatives. As discussed under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Financial and Performance Metrics,” our monthly active users and last twelve months Active Buyers were negatively impacted by our decision to significantly reduce our digital advertising expenditures. Starting in the third quarter of 2021, in response to these headwinds, we commenced a number of initiatives that we believe will improve the user experience and increase retention, including (i) enhancing our product quality and selection, (ii) providing an unmatched fun and entertaining shopping experience, and (iii) improving the performance of the app. We believe our continued strategy to increase users’ experience in our marketplace and provide a more differentiated and engaging user experience will position us for long-term sustainable growth, but there can be no assurance that our initiatives will be successful.

Many other factors, some of which are beyond our control, may reduce our ability to acquire, maintain and further engage with users, including those described in this “Risk Factors” section and the following:

As a result of any of these factors or any additional factors that are outside of our control, if we are unable to continue acquiring new users or increasing engagement with existing users, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

If we are unable to promote, maintain, and protect our brand and reputation, and offer a compelling user experience, our ability to attract new users and engage with our existing base of users will be impaired.

We believe that maintaining our brand and reputation will be critical to attracting new users and encouraging users to transact on our platform. In addition to targeted online marketing, we spend a considerable amount of resources on promoting our brand and reputation. For example, starting in 2020, we began to invest in additional off-line marketing activities. Our brand promotion activities may not be successful or cost effective, and to the extent that these activities yield increased revenue,required by SEC regulations, at the increased revenue may not offset the expenses we incur. If we do not successfully drive brand awareness, we may failsame location on our website identified above and in public filings. Our Code of Conduct and Ethics represents our commitment to attract new users or increase engagement with existing users and our business may not grow or may decline, all of which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Our ability to provide a high-quality user experience is also highly dependent on external factors over which we may have little or no control, including, without limitation, the reliability and performanceintegrity. The purpose of our merchantsCode of Conduct and third-party carriers. If our users are dissatisfiedEthics is to promote compliance with the quality of the products sold on our platform, the customer service they receive or their overall user experience, or if our merchants or third-party carriers cannot deliver products to our users in a timely manner or at all, our users may stop purchasing products on our platform. Our users may also become dissatisfied with their user experience if they are unable to receive timely customer service,applicable laws, regulations, and becausecompany policies; address common ethical situations we rely in large part on an automated customer service system, it is possible our users could become dissatisfied with our customer service. We also rely on merchants for information, including product characteristics, descriptions, images, and availability that may be inaccurate or misleading. Our failure to provide our users with high-quality products and high-quality user experiences for any reason could substantially harm our reputation and adversely impact our efforts to develop Wish as a trusted brand, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

In addition, we may be subject to unfavorable publicity that would create a public perception that non-authentic, counterfeit, dangerous, illegal, or defective goods are sold on our platform, or that our policies and practices are insufficient to deter or respond to such conduct. Even if these claims are factually incorrect or based on isolated incidents, it could damage our reputation, diminish the value of our brand, draw governmental or regulatory scrutiny or action, undermine our trust and credibility, or have a negative impact on our ability to attract new users, or discourage our existing users from continuing to transact on our platform. We may also be subject to negative media regarding our privacy or cyber security practices, terms of service, product quality, litigation or regulatory activity, the sale of illicit or dangerous goods, other unauthorized actions by merchants on our platform, or the actions of other companies that provide similar services to ours, which may adversely affect our reputation, business, and financial results.

The transition to a new Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) will be critical to our success and our business may be adversely impacted if we do not successfully manage the transition process in a timely manner.

Our success depends, in part, on the effectiveness of Vijay Talwar, our recently appointed CEO who will be critical to setting and achieving our vision, strategic direction, culture, products, and technology. The CEO transition, and any related speculation and uncertainty regarding our future business strategy and direction may be disruptive to the Company and our relationships with customers and employees. If we are unable to execute an orderly transition and successfully integrate Mr. Talwar into our leadership team, revenue, operating results, and financial conditions may be adversely affected.

Additionally, even though Piotr Szulczewski remains on the Board, the departure of Mr. Szulczewski as our CEO will result in a loss of institutional knowledge. This loss of knowledge and experience can be mitigated through successful hiring and transition, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such efforts. The ability of Mr. Talwar to quickly expand his knowledge of our business, operations, and strategic plans will be critical to the Board and our management’s ability to make informed decisions about our strategic direction and operations.

If we lose the services of members of our senior management team or key employees, we may not be able to execute our business strategy.

Competition for talentencounter in our industrybusiness; promote integrity and the technology industry has become increasingly intense ashighest standards of ethical conduct; and avoid even the current labor market to build, retain, and replace highly skilled personnel has become highly competitive. We rely on the continued serviceappearance of our senior management team, key employees, and other highly skilled personnel. The failure to properly manage succession plans, develop leadership talent, and/or replace the loss of services of senior management or other key employees, could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our objectives. From time to time, there may be changes in our senior management team resulting from the hiring or departure of executives, which could disrupt our business. We do not have long-term employment agreements with any of our key personnel, and do not maintain any “key person” life insurance policies. The loss of the services of one or more of our senior management or other key employees for any reason could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and require significant amounts of time, training and resources to find suitable replacements and integrate them within our business and could affect our corporate culture. Further,anything improper in connection with our business activities.

9

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Our “named executive officers” for 2023 were:

Summary Compensation Table For 2023

The following table sets forth information concerning the announcement of our restructuring plan, we may find it even more difficulttotal compensation awarded to, recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, which could harm our business. See the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—February 2022 Restructuring Plan” and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12. Subsequent Events, “February 2022 Restructuring Plan,” for further discussion of our restructuring plan.

We rely on the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store to offer and promote our app. If we are unable to maintain a good relationship with such platform providers, if their terms and conditions changeearned by, or paid to our detriment, if we violate, or if a platform provider believes that we have violated, the terms and conditions of its platform, our business will suffer.

A significant portion of our users download our mobile app through the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store, and over 90% of our user activity and purchases occur on our mobile app.

We are subject to the policies and terms of service of these third-party platforms, which govern the promotion, distribution, content, and operation of our app on the platform. Each platform provider has broad discretion to change and interpret its terms of service and other policies with respect to us and other developers, and those changes may be unfavorable to us. A platform provider may also add fees associated with access to and use of its platform, alter how we are able to advertise on the platform, prevent our app from being offered on their platform, change how the personal information of its users is made available to application developers on the platform, or limit the use of personal information for advertising purposes.

If we violate, or a platform provider believes we have violated, its terms of service (or if there is any change or deterioration in our relationship with these platform providers), that platform provider could limit or discontinue our access to the platform. A platform provider may also object to content created by merchants on our platform, such as drug paraphernalia or adult content, and our perceived distribution or advertisement of such content may cause a platform provider to view us in a negative light or take other adverse actions against us. For example, platform providers have warned application developers on their platform, including Wish, that providing content related to drug paraphernalia or adult content could cause such platform providers to remove the apps from their platforms. While we believe that we have complied with platform providers’ requirements, they may introduce additional requirements in the future. If a platform provider establishes more favorable relationships with one or more of our competitors or such platform provider determines that we are a competitor, our access to a platform may be limited or discontinued entirely. Any limit or discontinuation of our access to any platform could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In the past, some of these platforms have been unavailable for short periods of time. This and other changes, bugs, or technical system issues could degrade the user experience on our platform. There may also be changes to mobile hardware or software technology that make it more difficult for our users to access and use our platform on their mobile devices, which could adversely affect our user growth and user engagement. If any of these events recurs on a prolonged, or even short-term basis, or other similar issues arise that impact users’ ability to access our app or use mobile devices, our business, financial condition, results of operations, or reputation may be harmed.

If we are unable to offer features and attract merchants to list products that keep pace with changing consumer preferences, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Constantly changing consumer preferences have affected and will continue to affect the ecommerce industry. We must stay ahead of emerging consumer preferences and anticipate product trends that will appeal to existing and potential users. Our users choose to purchase products due in part to the attractive prices that we offer, and they may choose to shop elsewhere if we cannot match the prices offered by other websites and platforms or by brick-and-mortar stores. If our users do not find our platform entertaining and are not shown desired products on our platform at attractive prices, they may lose interest in us, which in turn may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We rely on our merchants to provide a positive experience to our users.

Negative publicity or sentiment as a result of complaints about merchants selling on our platform could reduce our ability to attract users, discourage users from making additional purchases on our platform, or otherwise damage our reputation. A perception that our levels of responsiveness and support for our users are inadequate could have similar results. In some situations, we may choose to reimburse users for their purchases to help avoid harm to our reputation, but we may not be able to recover the funds we expend for those reimbursements.

Disruptions in the operations of a substantial number of merchants on our platform, to the extent they are caused by events that are beyond their control, such as interruptions in order or payment processing, transportation disruptions, natural disasters, pandemics, inclement weather, geo-political conflicts, including the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine arising from the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, terrorism, public health crises, or political unrest, could result in negative experiences for a substantial number of our users, which could harm our reputation and adversely affect our business. For example, during the initial outbreak of COVID-19, our merchants based in China experienced supply interruptions and delivery delays. If there are subsequent or further increases in the number of COVID-19 outbreaks in China or elsewhere, merchants on our platform may experience additional disruptions to their supply and restrictions on their ability to deliver products to our users in a timely manner, which could harm our business.

Our brand, reputation, and business may be harmed if merchants on our platform use unethical or illegal business practices, including the sale of hazardous, counterfeit, fraudulent, or illegal products, or if our policies and practices with respect to such sales are perceived or found to be inadequate, and we may be impacted by the unlawful activities of merchants on our platform.

It is important that both merchants and users have confidence in the transactions they are completing on our platform. Merchants on our platform have in the past, and may in the future, engage in illegal or unethical business practices. Allegations or findings of such illegal or unethical business practices by merchants on our platform could harm our brand, reputation, and business. Our policies promote legal and ethical business practices, such as prohibiting false or misleading seller or product information, the listing or sale of counterfeit or otherwise infringing goods, and the listing or sale of hazardous, fraudulent, or illegal products. For example, our merchant terms explicitly prohibit any illegal activity by merchants and require compliance with our policies. We maintain a suite of policies that educate merchants regarding items and practices that are explicitly prohibited from the platform, as well as the penalties for violations of our policies. We enforce these policies through the use of human and machine reviews as well as penalties for merchants if a violation of the policies is discovered. However, we do not control merchants or their business practices and cannot ensure their compliance with our policies.

If merchants on our platform engage in illegal or unethical business practices or are perceived to do so, we may receive negative publicity and our brand and reputation may be harmed.

Additionally, while we do not control merchants and cannot ensure their compliance with applicable law, we nevertheless frequently receive and respond to inquiries and demands from regulators and law-enforcement agencies around the globe, and we expect to continue to receive more inquiries and demands in the future. If our policies are violated by merchants, or if our policies and practices or responses to such conduct are perceived as or found to be inadequate by regulators or law-enforcement agencies, it could subject us to government inquiries, investigations, or enforcement actions, as well as potential civil or criminal liabilities, or requiring changes to our policies and practices with respect to illegal or unethical business practices that could lower our revenue, increase our costs, make our platform less user-friendly, or otherwise adversely impact our business. This has been the case in France, where regulators are trying to hold Wish accountable and responsible for the purportedly illegal or hazardous listings created by merchants; we are currently responding to and challenging these claims in French courts.  Separately, during the initial outbreak of COVID-19, a small number of merchants created listings of personal protective equipment and other health-related products that regulators deemed to violate consumer protections related to pricing and advertising. Though these listings were posted by merchants in violation of our policies, Wish has received and may continue to receive inquiries and demands from regulators regarding these listings.

Our merchants are subject to regulation by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and similar state and international regulatory authorities in the United States and abroad, and their products sold on our platform could be subject to involuntary recalls, takedown notices, and other actions by these authorities. Concerns about product safety, including concerns about the safety of products manufactured in developing countries, could lead to recalls of selected products sold on our platform. Recall and government or user concerns about product safety could harm our reputation and reduce sales, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

Proposed laws in Europe, the United States, and other jurisdictions and/or novel interpretations or enforcement of existing law may change the scope of platform liability, and ongoing case law developments may unpredictably increase our liability as a platform for merchant activity or for activities adjacent to the marketplace, such as logistics, or otherwise constrain or impede our ability to do business in a given jurisdiction. In that event, we may be held directly or secondarily liable for the intellectual property infringement, product compliance deficiencies, consumer protection deficiencies, privacy and data protection incidents, or regulatory issues of our merchants, including potentially for their conduct over which we have no control or influence. Moreover, we may be subject to product liability claims where merchants lack sufficient assets or are not reachable, which could be costly to defend in the aggregate. Regardless of the validity of any claims made against us, we may incur significant costs and efforts to defend against or settle them. We expect to continue to receive inquiries or demands from regulators and law enforcement regarding intellectual property, product compliance, and product safety. This could lead to government investigations, inquiries, and/or the imposition of penalties, fines and/or criminal liability in certain jurisdictions and, consequently, would be costly, time consuming, and would adversely impact our business.

Merchants on our platform have in the past, and may in the future, engage in fictitious transactions or collaborate with third parties in order to artificially inflate their sales records and search results rankings. Such activity may frustrate other merchants by enabling the perpetrating merchants to be favored over legitimate merchants, may harm users by misleading them to believe that a merchant is more reliable or trustworthy than the merchant actually is, and may impact key performance metrics. Although we have implemented policies and practices to detect and penalize merchants who engage in fraudulent activities on our platform, there can be no assurance that such policies and practices will be effective in preventing fraudulent transactions. Any of these activities may adversely affect our brand, reputation, and business. If a governmental authority determines that we have aided and abetted the infringement or sale of counterfeit goods or if legal changes result in us potentially being liable for actions by merchants on our platform, we could face regulatory, civil, or criminal penalties. Successful claims by third-party rights owners could require us to pay substantial damages or refrain from permitting any further listing of the relevant items. These types of claims could force us to modify our business practices, which could lower our revenue, increase our costs, or make our platform less user friendly. Moreover, public perception that counterfeit or other unauthorized items are common in our platform, even if factually incorrect, could result in negative publicity and damage to our reputation and brand.

Our merchants rely on third-party carriers and transportation providers as part of the fulfillment process, and these third parties may fail to adequately serve our users and comply with shipping and related regulations, which could adversely affect our service offerings and results of operations.

We rely on merchants to properly and promptly prepare products ordered by our users for shipment and our logistics program relies on third-party carriers and logistics providers to deliver products as well as third parties to consolidate packages for shipping. Any failure by merchants to timely prepare such products for shipment or any delay by third-party carriers to deliver the products will have an adverse effect on the fulfillment of user orders, which could negatively affect the user experience and harm our business and results of operations. Any increase in shipping costs, any significant shipping difficulties, disruptions or delays, or any failure by merchants on our platform to deliver products in a timely manner or to otherwise adequately serve our users, could damage our reputation and brand, and may harm our business. For example, due to abrupt new VAT regulations in Colombia (and related evolving interpretations of the same by local regulatory enforcement agencies), the de minimis threshold exception to remitting VAT for certain low-value declared parcels was removed, subjecting any and all parcels (regardless of import value) to VAT payment obligations. Further, there was industry-wide confusion as to whether the exemption from VAT liability applied to items "shipped from" or "originating in" countries with which Colombia has a Free Trade Agreement (“FTA”). This caused certain parcels shipped by Wish merchants to be held up at Colombia customs, causing delays and increasing charges for consumers. Also, in the first quarter of 2018, PostNord, the postal service in Sweden, suspended delivery of packages coming from outside the European Union as it evaluated imposing processing fees and collection of taxes, which resulted in a decrease in sales in Sweden. In addition, during the initial outbreak of COVID-19, our cross-border logistics function was severely impacted in terms of both disrupted processing capabilities and increased costs, which resulted in a decrease in sales due to higher logistics costs and higher refund rates due to poor performance. Our merchants based in China also experienced supply interruptions and delivery delays during the initial outbreak of COVID-19 and have continued to experience such interruptions and delays, which may continue to have an adverse effect on our users’ experience on our platform.

Historically, our merchants in China have benefitted from lower shipping costs due to the Universal Postal Union Treaty (“UPU”). Certain expected changes to UPU postal rates that went into effect in July 2020 and other expected changes that will be implemented in the future are likely to increase the shipping rates our merchants incur to ship products from China. For example, Congress is currently considering a bill that would bar packages from non-market economies (currently only China) from qualifying for tariff-free entry into the United States under the existing de minimis statute. If this bill is enacted into law, it would make importing goods from China to the United States more complicated and expensive, which could adversely affect our business. The actions we have taken in our logistics program to mitigate these increased costs may not be successful over the long term. If there are increases in shipping costs, including rising oil and gas prices, the sales price of products on our platform could increase, which could reduce the volume of transaction activity on our platform to decrease and may consequently have a negative impact on our results of operations.

We generate a portion of our revenue from merchant advertising on our platform. A reduction in advertising spend by merchants could harm our business.

We have implemented new features on our platform, such as ProductBoost, which allow merchants to promote their listings to our users. In addition to generating revenue from merchants, these advertisements may also result in increased purchases by users. However, not all merchants on our platform may agree with us on the value of these new features and may not use ProductBoost, and some of our merchants could react negatively to these new features. During the initial outbreak of COVID-19, merchant advertising declined due to the shutdown of business activity in China. If we are unable to monetize existing and new features for merchants, it could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition, and prospects.

Our continued efforts to improve our logistics programs and enable faster and more reliable delivery in order to help grow our business and generate revenue may not be effective.

We have worked to improve our logistics programs and to streamline our processes in order to provide a more consistent and reliable experience for our users through programs such as Wish Express and Wish Local. However, we still rely on third-party carriers for delivery and we are still in the process of establishing reliable long-term agreements with such carriers both in the United States and worldwide. If we are not able to negotiate acceptable pricing, service level requirements, and other terms with these carriers, or these carriers experience capacity or performance problems or other issues, it could negatively impact our results of operations and our users’ experience. For example, due to COVID-19 and related supply chain issues, global logistics has experienced longer delivery times.

We have also developed and experimented with different logistics offerings in order to monetize our logistics platform. This is a relatively new business initiative for us. If we are unable to consistently generate revenue from our logistics platform or offer logistics services that are appealing to merchants and users, or if changes in carrier policies and pricing, shortage of low-cost carriers, and fluctuation of oil and gas prices result in higher logistics costs, it could have a material impact on our business, financial condition, and prospects.

Building out our Wish Local program may be costly and time intensive and we may not receive the expected benefits.

In 2019, we introduced Wish Local, a program that develops partnerships with local brick-and-mortar stores that can serve as local pickup and delivery locations for users’ orders. In addition, we are in the process of expanding the Wish Local program to partner with collection point network providers in some countries to provide additional local pickup and dropoff locations for user’s orders. The process of reaching out to and entering into relationships with these retailers can be time intensive and costly because we must evaluate and approve each retailer individually prior to them becoming part of the Wish Local program. Therefore, growing Wish Local may be more expensive and time consuming than we have estimated. Also, users may not use the Wish Local program as much as we expect, which would delay or prevent any expected benefits. For example, users have curtailed their use of Wish Local due to health concerns regarding COVID-19, which has slowed the growth of this program.

Our terms of service require Wish Local retailers to meet certain service level requirements with respect to holding and delivering Wish orders to users. If these retailers do not comply with these service level requirements, our reputation may be harmed. Additionally, we may need to implement monitoring systems to confirm that the Wish Local retailers are complying with service level requirements and to prevent fraudulent activities by these retailers. Implementing these systems may prove to be costly and time intensive.

The market in which we operate is rapidly evolving and we face intense competition; if we do not compete effectively, our results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.

Our market is highly competitive and characterized by rapid changes in technology and consumer sentiment. Competition in our industry has intensified, and we expect this trend to continue as the list of our competitors grows. This competition, among other things, affects our ability to attract new users and engage our existing users.

We compete with ecommerce platforms and other retailers for merchants on our platform and merchants can list their goods on a number of ecommerce platforms, such as Amazon.com, Alibaba, Shein, and Shopify.

There are various factors that affect how merchants engage with our platform, including:

We also compete with retailers for the attention of users. A user has the choice of shopping with any online or offline retailer, whether large marketplaces, such as Amazon.com, Alibaba, Shein, and Shopify, as well as more traditional discount retailers, such as Walmart and Target, and discount retailers that offer heavily discounted and off-season merchandise, such as Dollar General and TJ Maxx, or local stores or other venues or marketplaces. Many of these competitors offer low-cost or free shipping, fast shipping times, favorable return policies, and other features that may be difficult or impossible for our merchants to match.

There are various factors that affect how users engage with our platform, including:

Some of our competitors have, and potential competitors may have, longer operating histories, greater financial, technical, marketing, institutional and other resources, faster shipping times, lower-cost shipping, larger databases, greater name and brand recognition, or a larger base of users or merchants than we do. For example, Google or Facebook could enter the ecommerce space and they have significantly more resources and users than we do. They may devote greater resources to the development, marketing, and promotion of their services than we do, and they may offer lower pricing or free shipping to the users on their platforms. These factors may allow our competitors to derive greater revenue and profits from their existing user and merchant bases, acquire users at lower costs or respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in trends and consumer shopping behavior. If we are unable to compete successfully, or if competing successfully requires us to expend greater resources, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We have a limited operating history at our current scale, which may make it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects.

We began commercial operations in 2010 and have a limited history of generating revenue at our current scale. As a result of our relatively short operating history at our current scale, we have limited financial data that can be used to evaluate our business and future prospects. Any evaluation of our business and prospects must be considered in light of our limited operating history, which may not be indicative of future performance. Because of our limited operating history, we face increased risks, uncertainties, expenses, and difficulties, including the risks and uncertainties discussed in this section.

We have a history of operating losses and we may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future.

Since our inception in 2010, we have incurred net losses each year. We incurred net losses of $361 million, $745 million, and $129 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $2.5 billion. We may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future. Our operating expenses may continue to increase in the future as we increase our efforts to expand our user base, continue to invest in the research and development of our technologies and service offerings and continue to operate as a public company. These efforts may be more costly than we expect and we may not be able to increase our revenue to offset our operating expenses. Our revenue growth slowednamed executive officers for the year ended December 31, 20212023.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

Base Salaries and may slow again, or our revenue may decline forAnnual Incentive Opportunities

To maintain a number of other possible reasons, including increased competition, a decreasecompetitive executive compensation program, we offer cash compensation in the growth or reduction in sizeform of annual base salaries to reward individual contributions and to compensate our executives for their day-to-day responsibilities. We typically do not also provide any form of short-term cash incentive program to our executive officers.

10

Our Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our overall market, or if we fail for any reason to capitalize on growth opportunities.

Our company is evolving, and we areexecutive officers in connection with our annual performance review cycle. In March 2023, the process of executing on new business strategies and restructuring efforts; if we fail to successfully execute on these strategies, our business, financial condition, and operating results could be harmed.

Our business is undergoing significant changes and our business strategy is constantly evolving. Our success depends on our ability to adapt our business model to changing market conditions and consumer spending habits. For example, in 2021, we made a number of strategic decisions in an effort to improve our business operations and our marketplace offerings in response toCompensation Committee reviewed the headwinds of reduced retention and new buyer conversion and a rise in digital advertising costs. Nevertheless, certain elements of this shift in strategy, or any future changes to our strategy that we may make could be disruptive to our business and our employees if we do not manage the changes properly. Furthermore, continuing changes in macroeconomic trends, shifting consumer priorities, and the COVID-19 pandemic may hamper and delay our efforts by, for example, making our assumptions regarding our strategies incorrect or subject to change or causing our strategies to not have the effect and outcomes that we anticipate.

We may not successfully execute or achieve the expected benefitsbase salaries of our restructuringexecutive officers and turnaround initiatives, which could adversely affect our business.

We recently announced a turnarounddetermined that it would increase the base salaries of Ms. Liu and restructuring strategy which focuses on narrowing our business focus, reducing our headcount and outside spend, reviewing our real estate footprint, and a number of other cost saving measures. These restructuring initiatives are intended to focus the business on operational efficiency and right-sizing our expenses for 2022 and beyond. Although we believe these initiatives address the needs of our business and its long-term objectives, our strategy is based on certain assumptions and forecasts, which are subject to risks and uncertainties, including whether we have accurately identified the issues, whether we targeted the appropriate cost saving measures, and whether our right-sizing efforts are executed at the appropriate scale and scope. Consequently, the implementation of these restructuring initiatives may not be successful in yielding the intended results. Moreover, implementation of these initiatives may be costly and disruptive to our business, with the intended impact falling short or resulting in an overcorrection. Our cost cutting initiatives may negatively affect employee morale, which could result in personnel losses beyond the planned workforce reduction, diminished productivity, loss of institutional knowledge, and difficulty attracting highly skilled employees. The intended results of our turnaround effort may also be impacted by negative publicity about the Company and/or our restructuring initiatives, resulting in reputational harm, diminished investor confidence, and consumer backlash. These new initiatives have and may continue to require a significant amount of executive management’s time and focus, which may divert attention from other areas of our business. See the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— February 2022 Restructuring Plan” and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12. Subsequent Events, “February 2022 Restructuring Plan,” for further discussion of our restructuring plan.

Use of social media, emails, and text messages may adversely impact our reputation or subject us to fines or other penalties.

We use social media, emails, and text messages as part of our omnichannel approach to marketing. As laws and regulations rapidly evolve to govern the use of these channels, the failure by us, our employees or third parties acting on our behalf or at our direction to abide by applicable laws and regulations in the use of these channels could adversely affect our reputation or subject us to fines, other penalties, or lawsuits. Although we continue to update our practices as these laws change over time, we may be subject to lawsuits alleging our failure to comply with such laws. In addition, our employees or third parties acting on our behalf or at our direction may knowingly or inadvertently use social media, including through advertisements, in ways that could lead to the loss or infringement of intellectual property, as well as the public disclosure of proprietary, confidential, or sensitive personal information of our business, employees, users, merchants, or others. Any such inappropriate use of social media, emails, and text messages could also cause reputational damage.

Moreover, changes in advertising and tracking policies of mobile device operating systems and platforms (e.g., Apple and Android) may limit or prevent the collection and use of certain data elements for certain purposes, such as ad targeting, and the use of such data elements may subject us to fines or other penalties.

Our users may engage with us online through social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, by providing feedback and public commentary about all aspects of our business. Information concerning us or our merchants, whether accurate or not, may be posted on social media platforms at any time and may have a disproportionately adverse impact on our brand, reputation, or business. The harm may be immediate without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

We are subject to payment-related risks.

Our users can pay for purchases using a variety of methods, including through credit cards or Buy Now, Pay Later solutions through various third-party payment providers, and we pay our merchants through a variety of methods. If these service providers do not perform adequately or if our relationships with these service providers were to terminate, our users’ ability to place orders, and our merchants’ ability to receive orders or payment could be adversely affected and our business could be harmed. For example, in 2014, PayPal temporarily suspended processing payments on our platformMr. Monico, as a result of concerns related to products listed ontheir performance, criticality, and expected future contributions. Such salaries became effective in April 2023. The base salaries of Messrs. Yan and Monico and Ms. Liu were set by our platform. If a third-party payment provider suspends service or has significant outages inCompensation Committee at the future and we do not have alternative payment providers in place or are unable to provide our own solution, our business could be harmed. Likewise, if our third-party payment providers experience a security breach or fraud attack, our merchants and users could be adversely impacted. In addition, if our third-party providers increase the fees they charge us, our operating expenses could increase. If we respond by increasing the fees we charge to our merchants, some merchants may increase the pricetime of their products, stop listing new itemscommencement of employment with us, taking into account previous experience, competitive market data and benchmarks, critically needed skills and expected future contributions, and which reflected their individual negotiation with us as part of their employment packages with us.

Our named executive officers’ 2023 base salaries were as follows: $550,000 for sale or even close their accounts altogether.Mr. Yan; $600,000 for Ms. Liu; and $500,000 for Mr. Monico.

The laws and regulations related to payments are complex, evolving, subject to change and vary across different jurisdictions in the United States and globally. Any failure or claim of our failure to comply, or any failure by our third-party payment processors to comply, could cost us substantial resources and could result in liabilities. Further, through our agreements with our third-party payment processors, we are indirectly subject to payment card association operating rules, and certification requirements, including the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard and Visa Network Rules, which are subject to change. Failure to comply with these rules and certification requirements could impact our ability to meet our contractual obligations with our third-party payment processors and could result in potential fines. We are also subject to rules governing electronic funds transfers. Any change in these rules and requirements could make it difficult or impossible for us to comply. In addition, similar to a potential increase in costs from third-party providers described above, any increased costs associated with compliance with payment card association rules could lead to increased fees for our merchants, which may negatively impact our marketplaces.

We track certain performance metrics with internal tools and do not independently verify such metrics. Certain of our performance metrics are subject to inherent challenges in measurement, and real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may harm our reputation and negatively affect our business.Equity Compensation

We calculate and track performance metrics with internal tools, which are not independently verified by any third-party. While we believeTo focus our metrics are reasonable estimates of our user or merchant base fornamed executive officers on the applicable period of measurement, the methodologies used to measure these metrics require significant judgment and may be susceptible to algorithm or other technical errors. For example, user accounts are based on email addresses, and a user could use multiple email addresses to establish multiple accounts, and merchants in many instances will have multiple accounts. As a result, the data we report may not be accurate. Our internal tools and processes we use to identify multiple accounts or fraudulent accounts have a number of limitations, and our methodologies for tracking key metrics may change over time, which could result in unexpected changes to our metrics, including historical metrics. Our ability to recalculate our historical metrics may be impacted by data limitations or other factors that require us to apply different methodologies for such adjustments and we generally do not intend to update previously disclosed metrics for any such changes. Though we regularly review our processes for calculating metrics and may adjust our processes for calculating metrics to improve their accuracy, limitations or errors with respect to how we measure data (or the data that we measure) may affect our understanding of certain detailsachievement of our business which could affectobjectives, a majority of their compensation is equity-based. We emphasize the use of equity compensation in the form of RSU awards to motivate our longer term strategies. If our performance metrics are not accurate representationsnamed executive officers to focus on the growth of our business, user or merchant base, or traffic levels; if we discover material inaccuracies inoverall enterprise value and, correspondingly, to create sustainable long-term value for our metrics; or if the metrics we rely on to track our performance do not provide an accurate measurement of our business, user or merchant base or traffic levels, we may not be able to effectively implement our business strategy, our reputation may be harmed, and our operating and financial results could be adversely affected.

stockholders. Our merchants, platform partners, and investors rely on our key metrics as a representation of our performance. If these third parties do not perceive our user metrics to be accurate representations of our user base or user engagement, or if we discover material inaccuracies in our user metrics, our reputation may be harmed and merchants may be less willing to sell on our platform, which could negatively affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

We must develop new offerings to respond to our users’ and merchants’ changing needs.

Our industry is characterized by rapidly changing technology, new service and product introductions, and changing user and merchant demands.

Our users and merchants may not be satisfied with our new platform offerings or perceive that the new offerings do not respond to their needs. Developing new offerings is complex, and the timetable for commercial release is difficult to predict and may vary from our historical experience. As a result, the introduction of new offerings may occur after anticipated or announced release dates. In addition, new offerings could require us to comply with additional governmental regulations. Our new offerings also may bring us more directly into competition with companies that are better established or have greater resources than we do.

If we do not continue to cost-effectively develop new offerings that satisfy our users or merchants, then our competitive position and growth prospects may be harmed. In addition, new offerings may have lower margins than existing offerings and our revenue may not grow enough as a result of the new offerings to offset the cost of developing them.

If we fail to maintain, expand, and diversify our relationships with merchants, our revenue and results of operations will be harmed.

We rely on our merchants to offer products that appeal to our existing and potential users at attractive prices. Our ability to provide popular products on our platform at attractive prices depends on our ability to develop mutually beneficial relationships with our merchants. For example, we rely on our merchants, most of whom are based in China, to make available sufficient inventory and fulfill large volumes of orders in an efficient and timely manner to ensure a positive user experience. Merchants can leave our platform at any time, so we may experience merchant attrition in the ordinary course of business resulting from several factors, such as losses to competitors, perception that marketing on our platform is ineffective, reduction in our or merchants’ marketing budgets, and the penalties we impose on merchants for failing to comply with our policies. We have had, and may continue to have, disputes with merchants with respect to their compliance with our delivery requirements, quality control policies and measures, and the penalties imposed by us for violation of these policies or measures, which may cause them to be dissatisfied with our platform or to legally challenge the enforceability of our terms. If we experience significant merchant attrition, or if we are unable to attract new and geographically-diverse merchants, our revenue and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. For example, during the initial outbreak of COVID-19, many of our merchants based in China were adversely impacted, which had a negative impact on the supply of inventory on our marketplace and our merchants based in China continue to be adversely impacted. In addition, our agreements with merchants also typically do not restrict them from establishing or maintaining business relationships with our competitors. Furthermore, Congress is currently considering a bill that would bar packages from non-market economies (currently only China) from qualifying for tariff-free entry into the United States under the existing de minimis statute. If this bill is enacted into law, it would make importing goods from China to the United States more complicated and expensive, which could adversely affect our business.

Failure to deal effectively with fraudulent activities on our platform would increase our loss rate and harm our business, and could severely diminish merchant and user confidence in and use of our services.

RSU awards is also consistent with broad competitive market practices at comparable technology companies. We have in the past incurred and may in the future incur losses from various types of fraud, including stolen credit card numbers, claimsbelieve that a user did not authorize a purchase, merchant fraud, and users who have closed bank accounts or have insufficient funds in open bank accounts to satisfy payments. We face risks with respect to fraudulent activities on our platform and periodically receive complaints from users who may not have received the products that they had contracted to purchase. In some jurisdictions, users may also have the right to cancel a sale made by a merchant within a specified time period and for any reason. Although we have implemented measures to detect and reduce the occurrence of fraudulent activities, combat bad user experiences, and increase user satisfaction, including evaluating merchants on the basis of their transaction history and restricting or suspending their activity, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective in combating fraudulent transactions or improving overall satisfaction among merchants, users, and other participants. Additional measures to address fraud could negatively affect the attractiveness of our services to users or merchants, resulting in a reduction in our ability to attract new users or continue to engage current users, damage to our reputation, or a diminution in the value of our brand.

Additionally, under current credit card practices, we are liable for fraudulent credit card transactions because we do not obtain a cardholder’s signature, which results in chargebacks made to our users that we are not able to collect from our merchants. We do not currently carry insurance against this risk. We face the risk of significant losses from this type of fraud as our net sales increase and as we continue to expand globally. Our failure to adequately control fraudulent credit card transactions could damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

We also accept payments for many of our sales through credit and debit card transactions, which are handled through third-party payment processors. As a result, we are subject to a number of risks related to credit and debit card payments, including that we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time and could require us to absorb or pass along an increase in our costs and expenses. In addition, as part of payment processing, our users’ credit and debit card information is transmitted to our third-party credit card payment processors. We may in the future become subject to lawsuits or other proceedings for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the actual or alleged theft of our users’ credit or debit card information if the security of our third-party credit card payment processors is breached. We and our third-party credit card payment processors are also subject to payment card association operating rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers, which could change or be reinterpreted to make it difficult or impossible for us to comply. If we or our third-party credit card payment processors fail to comply with these rules or requirements, we may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees and lose our ability to accept credit and debit card payments from our users in addition to the consequences that could arise from such action or inaction violating applicable privacy, data protection, data security and other laws as outlined above, and there may be an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

The COVID-19 pandemic may continue to adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic. In an effort to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19, many countries, including the United States, imposed and continue to impose unprecedented restrictions on travel and business operations, and there have been business closures and a substantial reduction in economic activity in countries that have had significant outbreaks of COVID-19.

Our operations and performance depend significantly on global and regional economic conditions, and the outbreak of COVID-19 has had a significant negative effect on global and regional economies. Further, the ability of our merchants to offer products and make available sufficient inventory in an efficient manner may be adversely affected by the health impacts, travel restrictions, required social distancing, and other governmental mandates due to COVID-19, which could negatively impact our users’ experience and cause our revenue and reputation to decline. Additionally, due to the continuing economic impacts caused by COVID-19, consumer discretionary spending has been adversely affected, which may cause the demand for the products available on our platform to be reduced and our revenue to decline.

We are conducting business with substantial restrictions, such as remote working and limited employee travel, among other modifications. While our business occurs over an online platform, which allows us to support our merchants and users virtually, we cannot be certain that our ability to service our merchants and users will not be adversely affected by COVID-19. We also continue to see disruption in the supply chain that is affecting delivery times.

At the beginning of the COVD-19 pandemic, we benefited from greater mobile usage and less competition from physical retail as a result of shelter-in-place mandates. We also benefited from increased user spending due to U.S. government stimulus programs.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to impact our business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the pandemic, travel restrictions, changes to consumer ecommerce activity in response to evolving governmental mandates that impact brick-and-mortar stores, supply chain and logistical challenges, global unemployment rates, shifting priorities of regulatory agencies in response to the pandemic, the development and distribution of vaccines, and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to prevent, contain, and treat the disease and its variants. The pandemic may have the effect of heightening or exacerbating many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section. See the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic” for a further discussion of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.

Our pricing strategies may not meet users’ price expectations or result in net income (loss), and laws and regulations could negatively impact the effectiveness of our model.

Our pricing strategies have had, and may continue to have, a significant impact on our revenue and net income (loss). In addition to offering discounted prices and shipping as a means of attracting users and encouraging repeat purchases, we use dynamic pricing, where pricing varies depending on factors such as user location and demand, which is intended to optimize revenue and volume and allows us to offer a variety of promotions and discounts. Such offers and discounts, however, may reduce our revenue and margins. In the future, laws applicable to data protection, consumer protection, and artificial intelligence may change in a manner that limits our ability to employ dynamic pricing. In addition, our competitors’ pricing and marketing strategies are beyond our control and can significantly affect the results of our pricing strategies. If our pricing strategies, which may evolve over time, fail to meet our users’ price expectations or fail to result in increased margins, or if we are unable to compete effectively with our competitors if they engage in aggressive pricing strategies or other competitive activities, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our refund policies may adversely affect our results of operations.

We have adopted user-friendly refund policies that make it convenient and easy for users to receive a refund after completing purchases. These policies are designed to improve users’ shopping experience and promote user loyalty, which in turn help us acquire and engage our existing users. However, these policies also subject us to additional costs and expenses which we may not recoup through increased revenue. We may also be required by law to adopt new or amend existing refund policies from time to time. These policies also make us more susceptible to misuse and if our refund policy is misused by a significant number of users, our costs may increase significantly, and our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. If we revise these policies to reduce our costs and expenses, our users may be dissatisfied, which may result in loss of existing users or failure to acquire new users at a desirable pace or cost, which may materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our ability to recruit and retain employees is important to our success.

Our future performance depends on our employees, including key engineering and product development personnel. Competition for key personnel is intense, especially in the San Francisco Bay area where our corporate headquarters are located, and we may be unable to successfully attract, integrate, or retain sufficiently qualified key personnel. In making employment decisions, particularly in the Internet and high-technology industries, job candidates often consider the value of the equity awards they would receive in connection with their employment and fluctuations in our stock price may make it more difficult to attract, retain, and motivate employees.

Our forecasts of market opportunity and market growth may prove to be inaccurate, and, even if these forecasts materialize, we cannot assure you our business will grow at similar rates, if at all.

Estimates of market opportunity and forecasts of market growth are subject to significant uncertainty and are based on assumptions and estimates that may not prove to be accurate, including due to the impacts from COVID-19. Any estimates of the size of the markets that we may be able to address and any forecasts relating to the expected growth in ecommerce and other markets are subject to many assumptions and may prove to be inaccurate. These markets may not grow at the rates that we forecast. We may not grow our business at similar rates, or at all. Our growth is subject to many factors, including our success in implementing our business strategy, which is subject to many risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, any estimates of market opportunity and forecasts of market growth, including any in this report, should not be taken as indicative of our future growth.

We rely on consumer discretionary spending and may be adversely affected by economic downturns and other macroeconomic conditions or trends.

Macroeconomic conditions may adversely affect our business. If general economic conditions deteriorate globally or in specific markets where we operate, consumer discretionary spending may decline and demand for products available in our platform may be reduced. A decrease in consumer discretionary spending would cause sales in our platform to decline and adversely impact our business. If the Company’s costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, the Company may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through increases in revenue as increases in core inflation rates may also affect consumers’ willingness to make discretionary purchases on our platforms. The Company’s inability or failure to do so could harm the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. As the world moves into new phases of the pandemic, with new variants emerging, and inflation on the rise, macroeconomic conditions may continue to trend downward for a more prolonged period than expected.

We face risks relating to the inventory we purchase ourselves.

We directly purchase, on a very limited basis, some of the products that we sell on our platform. We assume the inventory damage, theft, and obsolescence risks, as well as product safety and price erosion risks for products that we purchase directly. These risks could become more significant in the future if we increase the amount of inventory that we purchase. These risks could also become more significant depending on the types of product we hold in our inventory, such as products that are subject to seasonality, changes in consumer preferences, rapid technological change, obsolescence, and price erosion. If we choose to carry significant levels of inventory in the future, any one of these inventory risks could adversely affect our operating results.

Unfavorable changes or failure by us to comply with evolving internet and ecommerce regulations could substantially harm our business and operating results.

We are subject to general business regulations and laws as well as regulations and laws specifically governing the internet and ecommerce. These regulations and laws may involve taxes, privacy and data security, consumer protection, the ability to collect and/or share necessary information that allows us to conduct business on the internet, marketing communications and advertising, content protection, electronic contracts, or gift cards. Furthermore, the regulatory landscape impacting internet and ecommerce businesses is constantly evolving. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with any of these laws or regulations could result in damage to our reputation, a loss in business and proceedings, or actions against us by governmental entities or others, which could impact our operating results.

Our business could suffer if we are unsuccessful in making, integrating, and maintaining any future acquisitions and investments.

We may acquire businesses or technologies in the future. Integrating an acquired business or technology is difficult and can be risky. These potential and completed transactions create risks such as:

Moreover, acquisitions may divert management’s time and focus from operating our business. Acquisitions also may require us to spendhaving a substantial portion of our available cash, issue stock, incur debt or other liabilities, amortize expenses relatednamed executive officers’ target total direct compensation tied to intangible assets, or incur write-offsRSU awards aligns more closely with our business strategy to focus on long-term growth and innovation. We desire that our named executive officers share in the risk and rewards of goodwill or other assets. Finally, acquisitions could be viewed negatively by analysts, investors, merchants, or our users.

Welong-term performance, similar to our stockholders. For our executive officers, we may be involved in litigation matters or other legal proceedings that are expensivealso grant discretionary performance-based RSU awards, which we believe provide greater incentive and time consuming.

We may become involved in litigation matters, including class action lawsuits, relating to intellectual property, product liability, and consumer practices, whetherretention objectives for our own products or those offered by merchants,them, as well as other commercial disputes. Any lawsuit to which we are a party,further aligning their interests with or without merit, may result in an unfavorable judgment. We also may decide to settle lawsuits on unfavorable terms. Any such negative outcome could result in payments of substantial damages or fines, damage to our reputation, loss of rights, or adverse changes to our offerings or business practices. Any of these results could adversely affect our business. In addition, defending claims is costly and can impose a significant burden on our management.

Additionally, the market pricethose of our Class A common stock has beenstockholders.

In 2023, we used both options and may continueRSU awards as the long-term incentive compensation component of our executive compensation program. Options were granted solely to be volatile.  As a result, we have been named in lawsuits, and may be subject to both ongoing litigation and other requests related to our stock price/performance and/or Board performance and independence. In 2021, we were named as defendants in various securities litigations:  (1) In May 2021, four putative class action lawsuits were filed in U.S. federal court against the Company, its directors, certain of its officers and the underwriters named in its initial public offering (“IPO”) registration statement alleging violations of securities laws based on statements made in its registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SECMr. Yan in connection with its IPOthe commencement of his employment as our Chief Executive Officer, following his interim role with us; however, RSUs remain the primary type of equity award utilized for annual refresh and seeking monetary damages (“IPO cases”). Onepromotional awards to our executives.

Our RSU awards typically include a multi-year service-based vesting requirement, allowing them to serve as an effective retention tool while also motivating our named executive officers to work toward achieving our corporate objectives that we believe provide a meaningful return to our stockholders. Our stock options provide our newly hired executive officers with realizable value over time only if our stockholders also realize value after the date options are granted, thereby furthering the alignment of the interests of these four cases was dismissed, leaving three pending cases againstexecutive officers and stockholders.

In granting equity awards, our Compensation Committee generally considers, among other things, the Company, which have since been related and consolidated before one judge.  The lead case is Hoang v. ContextLogic, inc., and (2) in August 2021,named executive officer’s cash compensation, the need to create a shareholder derivative action purportedly brought on behalf of the Company, Patel v. Szulczewski, was filed in the U.S. federal court alleging that the Company’s directors and officers made or caused the Company to make false and/or misleading statements about the Company’s business operations and financial prospects in various public filings. This matter is stayed pending certain motion practice in the IPO cases. We are also subject to other securities litigation, a derivative action Aviv v. Szulczewski, discussed elsewhere herein. We may continue to be the target of securities litigations, and/or may receive other civil and regulator inquiries and requests, in the future. Securities litigation or inquiries or investigations against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business.

From time to time, we are subject to investigations, demands, litigation and other proceedings involving consumer protection, product safety, and data protection authorities or other regulatory agencies, including, in particular, in Denmark, France, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United States. These proceedings can result in civil and/or criminal penalties, large fines, other penalties, and/or remediation efforts and/or injunctive relief that could limit or restrict our ability to do business either in a given jurisdiction within a product class. For example, in France we are facing (1) civil litigation over product safety and merchant listings which the regulator deems to be unsafe or of poor quality; and (2) charges from the French authorities relating to the previous policies enabling merchants to utilize strike-through pricing, previous practices regarding non-translation of product listingsmeaningful opportunity for reward predicated on the Wish app and website, and allegations relating to anti-counterfeiting practices and policies. Separately, at the initial outbreakcreation of COVID-19, consumer protection authorities demanded rapid and decisive changes in the way that we screen and handle product listings that potentially violate various laws, including emergency price caps on certain items. Implementing these requests or defending against any associated fines could prove expensive and time consuming and negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition. While we may dispute the charges or cases, novel interpretations of the law or enforcement efforts could subject us to litigation and/or time consuming and costly remediation measures or otherwise impair business operations in a jurisdiction.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, which may result in material misstatements of our consolidated financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations.

During the preparation and the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In addition, given our reliance on information technology (“IT”) systems to synthesize both financial and nonfinancial information, any material weaknesses in our IT controls may result in errors in not only our consolidated financial statements but our nonfinancial metrics as well.  

The material weaknesses that we identified occurred because (i) the processes and controls over our IT systems relevant to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements were inadequate and (ii) the current processes in place were insufficient to allow us to complete the testing and assessment of the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting in a timely manner.

We cannot guarantee that our efforts will remediate these deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting or that additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future. Our failure to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in errors in our consolidated financial statements that could result in a restatement of our financial statements and could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, any of which could diminish investor confidence and cause a decline in the price of our Class A common stock. See Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” for further discussions of the identified material weaknesses.

Our management is required to evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to maintain effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy of our financial reports.

As a public company, we are required to maintain internal control over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal control. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Additionally, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to deliver an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting, and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming, costly, and place significant strain on our personnel, systems, and resources.

We are continuing to develop and refine our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we will file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers. While we continue to improve our internal control over financial reporting by hiring additional accounting, engineering, and business intelligence personnel and implementing process level and management review controls to identify and address emerging risks, we cannot guarantee that these changes will remediate future deficiencies or that additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future.

In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we have expended, and anticipate that we will continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight.  If any of these new or improved controls and systems do not perform as expected, we may experience further deficiencies in our controls.

Our current controls and any new controls that we develop may become inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business, some of which may arise from our restructuring and turnaround initiatives. We and our independent registered public accounting firm identified weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and additional weaknesses may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement could harm our results of operations, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, and adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and our independent registered public accounting firm’s attestation reports required by the SEC. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could diminish investor confidence, negatively affect the price of our Class A common stock, and could result in our delisting on the Nasdaq. As noted previously, see Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” for further discussions of the identified material weaknesses.

Risks Related to our International Operations

Economic tension between the United States and China, or between other countries, may intensify and the United States, China, or other countries may adopt drastic measures in the future that impact our business.

Our merchants source a large percentage of the products we list on our platform from China and other countries outside the United States and Europe. Additionally, most of our merchants, and some of our operations, are located in China, making the price and availability of products on our platform susceptible to international trade risks and other international economic conditions.

If the U.S. government or other governments impose tariffs or other economic measures that directly or indirectly increase the price of products it imports and that we list on our platform, the increased prices could have a material adverse effect onlong-term stockholder value, our financial results, our total annual equity budget and business. The effectsany share pool funding constraints, an evaluation of the imposedexpected and proposed tariffs are uncertain becauseactual performance of each named executive officer, their individual contributions and responsibilities, the dynamic natureretention hold of governmental action, relationstheir existing outstanding and responses. Further escalationunvested equity awards and how that hold lapses over time as the awards vest, and the recommendations of trade tensions between the United States and its trading partners, especially China, could result in long-term changes to global trade, including retaliatory trade restrictions that restrict the international flow of products. For example, Congress is currently considering a bill that would bar packages from non-market economies (currently only China) from qualifying for tariff-free entry into the United States under the existing de minimis statute. If this bill is enacted into law, it would make importing goods from China to the United States more complicated and expensive, which could adversely affect our business. We cannot predict what actions may ultimately be takenthen-current Chief Executive Officer (except with respect to tariffs or trade relations between the United Stateshis own equity awards) which take into account an analysis of competitive market data prepared by our compensation consultant and China or other countries, what products may beinternal pay parity considerations.

During 2023, we granted options to Mr. Yan and each of RSUs to Messrs. Yan and Monico and Ms. Liu under our 2020 Plan.

Mr. Yan was granted an award of 166,666 RSUs on February 27, 2023 which vests quarterly over two years, subject to such actions, or what actions may be taken byMr. Yan’s continued service with us, with the other countries in retaliation. Any alterations to our business strategy or operations made in order to adapt to or comply with any such changes would be time-consuming and expensive, and certainfirst quarterly vesting date on May 15, 2023. Mr. Yan was also granted an option award for 299,444 shares of our competitors may be better suitedcommon stock on February 27, 2023 which vests quarterly over two years, subject to withstand or reactMr. Yan’s continued service with us, with the first vesting date on May 15, 2023.

Ms. Liu was granted an award of 119,047 RSUs on April 27, 2023 which vests quarterly over two and a half years, subject to these changes.Ms. Liu’s continued service with us, with the first quarterly vesting date on August 15, 2023.

Mr. Monaco was granted an award of 119,047 RSUs on April 27, 2023 which vests quarterly over two and a half years, subject to Mr. Monaco’s continued service with us, with the first quarterly vesting date on August 15, 2023.

Additionally, certain jurisdictions may attempt11

Health and Welfare Benefits

Our named executive officers are eligible to restrict the operation and access of certain China-based companies, such as TikTok, WeChat and Alipay in the United States. In response, government authorities in China, or elsewhere, may seek to restrict access and operation of U.S. companies. Most of our merchants and some of our operations are located in China; if our operations or our merchant’s activities were restricted in China, our platform, our business, financial condition, and results of operations would be adversely affected.

We are not able to predict future economic policy of the United States, China, or of any foreign countries in which we operate. The adoption and expansion of restrictions, including restrictions on access to apps and other platforms, cross-border data transfers, tariffs, or other governmental action related to economic policies, has the potential to adversely impact our business, operational results and financial position.

Certain aspects of our business relating to the provision of financial services are subject to government regulation and oversight.

Many jurisdictions in which we operate have laws that govern financial services activities. Regulators in certain jurisdictions may determine that certain aspects of our business are subject to these laws and could require us to obtain licenses to continue to operate in such jurisdictions. For example, if we are deemed to be a money transmitter as defined by applicable regulation, we could be subject to certain laws, rules and regulations enforced by multiple authorities and governing bodies in the United States and abroad. If we are found to be a money transmitter or lender under any applicable regulation and we are not in compliance with such regulations, we may be subject to fines or other penalties in one or more jurisdictions levied by federal or state or local regulators, including state Attorneys General, as well as those levied by foreign regulators. In addition to fines, penalties for failing to comply with applicable rules and regulations could include criminal and civil proceedings or other enforcement actions. We could also be required to make changes to our business practices or compliance programs as a result of regulatory scrutiny.

One of our subsidiaries, ContextLogic B.V., received a payments institution license in 2021 from its regulatory authority, De Nederlandsche Bank. This license permits ContextLogic B.V. to operate as a payment service provider (including acquiring and executing payment transactions, as referred to in the Revised Payment Services Directive (“2015/2366/EU”) in the Netherlands. In addition, ContextLogic B.V. can offer its payment services in all other countries of the European Economic Area (“EEA”) on the basis of a European passport.As a regulated financial institution, ContextLogic B.V. is in compliance and will continue to comply with financial services regulations, including those relating to anti-money laundering, combating the financing of terrorism, and sanctioned or prohibited persons.

We continue to evaluate our options for seeking additional licenses and/or subsidiaries in several other jurisdictions to optimize our payment solutions, interchange fees, and to support the future growth of our business. We could be denied such licenses, have existing licenses revoked, or be required to make significant changes to our business operations before being granted such licenses. If we are denied licenses or such licenses are revoked, we may be forced to cease or limit business operations in certain jurisdictions, including in the EEA, and even if we are able to obtain such licenses, we could be subject to fines or other enforcement action, or stripped of such licenses, if we are found to violate the requirements of such licenses. Such regulatory actions, or the need to obtain regulatory approvals, could impose significant costs and involve substantial delay in payments we make in certain local markets, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or operating results.

In addition, laws related to money transmission and online payments are evolving, and changes in such laws could affect our ability to provide payment processing on our platformparticipate in the same formemployee benefit plans, and on the same terms and conditions, as we have historically, or at all. As we evolveall other full-time, salaried U.S. employees. These benefits include medical, dental, and vision insurance, business travel insurance, an employee assistance program, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, basic life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance, wellness benefits, and commuter benefits.

We design our business or make changesemployee benefits programs to our business structure, we may be subjectcompetitive in relation to additional laws or requirements related to money transmission, lending, online payments and financial regulation. These laws govern, among other things, money transmission, prepaid access instruments, lending, electronic funds transfers, anti-money laundering, combating the financing of terrorism, banking, systematic integrity risk assessments, cyber security of payment processes, sanctions and import and export restrictions. Our business operations may not always comply with these financial laws and regulations. Historical or future non-compliance with these laws or regulations could result in significant criminal and civil lawsuits, penalties, forfeiture of significant assets or other enforcement actions. Costs associated with fines and enforcement actions, market as well as reputational harm, changes in compliance requirements or limits on our ability to expand our product offerings, could harm our business.

Further, our payment system is susceptible to illegal and improper uses, including money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud and payments to sanctioned parties. We have invested and will need to continue to invest substantial resources to complycompliant with applicable financial services legislation, including anti-money laundering, combating the financing of terrorism, and sanctions laws. Government authorities may seek to bring legal action against us if we fail to prevent or detect that our payment system is used for improper or illegal purposes or if our enterprise risk management or controls  are not adequately assessed, updated, or implemented, and any such action could result in financial or reputational harm to our business.

Additionally, some of our merchants use applications, such as WeChat, for transmitting payments and communicating with us. If any of these payment applications were limited or banned by governmental authorities, certain payments could be delayed or our communications with merchants could be adversely impacted.

Certain aspects of our business are subject to global trade customs regulations and government oversight.

We are also within the scope of certain customs enquiries and subject to international trade law enforcement, that could require us to incur an increase in costs and/or impacting the supply and delivery-times of products from merchants to consumers, potentially causing us to experience damage in reputation and/or restricting our rate of global growth.

Our business is conducted worldwide, with goods imported from and exported to a substantial number of countries. The vast majority of products sold on our platform are shipped internationally. We are subject to numerous regulations, including customs and international trade laws that govern the importation, exportation, and sale of goods. For example, due to abrupt new VAT regulations in Colombia (and related evolving interpretations of the same by local regulatory enforcement agencies), the de minimis threshold exception to remitting VAT for certain low-value declared parcels was removed, subjecting any and all parcels (regardless of import value) to VAT payment obligations. Further, there was industry-wide confusion as to whether the exemption from VAT liability applied to items "shipped from" or "originating in" countries with which Colombia has a Free Trade Agreement (“FTA”). This caused certain parcels shipped by Wish merchants to be held up at Colombia customs, causing delays and increasing charges for consumers. Also, in the first quarter of 2018, PostNord, the postal service in Sweden, suspended delivery of packages coming from outside the European Union as it evaluated imposing processing fees and collection of taxes, which resulted in a decrease in sales in Sweden. In addition, during the initial outbreak of COVID-19, our cross-border logistics function was severely impacted in terms of both disrupted processing capabilities and increased costs, which resulted in a decrease in sales due to higher logistics costs and higher refund rates due to poor performance.

In addition, we face risks associated with trade protection laws, policies and measures and other regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment, including loss or modification of exemptions for taxes and tariffs, imposition of new tariffs and duties, and import and export licensing requirements in the countries in which we operate. If these laws or regulations were to change or were violated by our management, employees or merchants, we could experience delays in shipments of our goods, be subject to fines or penalties, or suffer reputational harm, which could reduce demand for our services and negatively impact our results of operations.

Legal requirements are frequently changed and subject to interpretation, and we are unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance with these requirements or their effects on our operations. We may be required to make significant expenditures to comply with existing or future laws and regulations, which may increasebest practices. We adjust our costs and materially limit our ability to operate our business. In addition, changes to legal requirements can create delays in the introduction and sale of our products and services, or in some cases, prevent the export or import or our products and services to certain countries, governments, or persons altogether.

We rely on the free flow of goods through open and operational ports worldwide. Labor disputes or other disruptions at ports create significant risks for our business, particularly if work slowdowns, lockouts, strikes, or other disruptions occur. Any of these factors could result in reduced sales or canceled orders, which may limit our growth and damage our reputation and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

We may see a significant loss of revenue in France or from users in Franceemployee benefits programs as a result of French regulator enforcement actions.

In November 2021, France’s Directorate General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Repression of Fraud (“DGCCRF”) issued an injunction delisting the Wish “App” from Google Play and the Apple App Store, and blocking Wish from appearing in Google, Bing and Qwant search results on the premise that unsafe products or products of poor quality are available for purchase on Wish. The DGCCRF is relying on an untested interpretation and enforcement of Europe’s Market Surveillance Regulation (“MSR”) to support its position that Wish is responsible as a distributor for products sold by merchants on the platform, and regarding the role of Wish in platform liability and immunity. In addition to the delisting and blocking, the injunction could also expose Wish to fines and penalties. As far as we know, this is a case of first impression in Europe; we are the first e-commerce company that we are aware of in the EU that has faced any such delisting/blocking, and the first of its kind in France. We took immediate measures to challenge the injunction, and to suspend and lift it. We are in the process of the legal challenge.

In December 2021, the French Administrative Court upheld the delisting injunction, but in so doing noted that the delisting is not intended to be, and should not be, permanent. We promptly appealed and that challenge is currently making its way through the appeals process in the French domestic courts.  Concurrently, we are also working on and towards a timeline for the lifting of the delisting injunction.

Meanwhile, the injunction has had significant effects on our revenues from France as we are unable to acquire new users on the App, old users are precluded from upgrading or updating their app, and mobile or web users are unable to find us or navigate to us from the main search engines in France.  In addition, we have ceased ad spend in France as a direct and proximate result of the injunction as there is no return on such an investment nor would we recoup any revenue from ad spending. We anticipate that in 2022 we may lose as much as 80-85% of our marketplace revenue in France as a result of the injunction if the delisting injunction is not ended, lifted or otherwise overruled.  

This injunction and the legal proceedings challenging it could also subject the Company to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from the Company’s business, and harm the Company’s business and financial results.  We may also be subject to additional civil and criminal litigation and/or penalties from the DGCCRF relating to any purported or perceived moderation of the platform and/or merchant activity on the platform.  

The injunction may also expose us to risk in the EU generally, should other regulators take a similar approach or interpretation to the MSR, and we may be the subject of additional requests for information, document requests or information in the EU.

Separately, in late December 2021, authorities in France charged ContextLogic with legal violations relating to the Company’s former policy permitting merchants to use strikethrough pricing in France, the Company’s previous failure to translate into French listings and product details on the Company’s app and website, and the Company’s anti-counterfeiting policies and practices.  The Company disputes the charges and is prepared to defend itself at the hearing in 2022.  Any adverse outcome could result in payment of substantial fines, payments to allegedly impacted consumer groups, harm to our reputation, loss of rights, or adverse changes to our offerings or business practices in France. Any of these results could adversely affect our business. In addition, defending claims may be costly and may impose a significant burden on our management.

Our international operations are subject to increased risks.

There are inherent risks in doing business internationally, including:

Violations of the complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations may result in litigation, fines, criminal actions, or sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees; restrictions on the operations of our business; and damage to our reputation. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate our policies. These risks inherent in our international operations and expansion increase our costs of doing business internationally and could harm our business.

We face exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Our user pricing and payments are denominated in the local currencies of the users, primarily in U.S. dollars and Euros, and we make a majority of our payments in Renminbi (“RMB”) to the merchants in China for products sold on the Wish platform, which creates exposure to currency rate fluctuations. Additionally, our operating expenses are denominated in the currencies of the countries in which our operations are located, and may be subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly changes in RMB. As part of our currency hedging strategy, we use financial instruments such as forward contracts to hedge our foreign currency exposure in order to reduce the frequency that we need to adjust local currency pricing as well as reduce the short-term impact of foreign currency rate fluctuations on our operating results.

Any factors that reduce cross-border trade or make such trade more difficult could harm our business.

Cross-border trade is an important source of revenue for us. The shipping of goods across national borders is often more expensive and complicated than domestic shipping. Customs and duty procedures and reviews, including duty-free thresholds in various key markets, the interaction of national postal systems, and security related governmental processes at international borders, may increase costs, discourage cross-border purchases, delay transit, and create shipping uncertainties. Any factors that increase the costs of cross-border trade or restrict, delay, or make cross-border trade more difficult or impractical, including any delays or other factors caused by the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine arising from the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, would lower our revenue and profits and could harm our business.

Changes in China’s economic, political or social conditions or government policies could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Most of our merchants, and some of our operations, are located in China. Accordingly, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may be influenced to a significant degree by political, economic and social conditions in China generally. The Chinese economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the level of government involvement, level of development, and growth rate. The Chinese government continues to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing industrial policies. The Chinese government also exercises significant control over China’s economic growth through allocating resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy, and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies.

Uncertainties with respect to the People’s Republic of China’s (“PRC”) legal system and changes in laws and regulations in China could adversely affect us.

Our operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. Our Chinese subsidiaries are subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investment in China. The PRC legal system is a civil law systemneeded based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions under the civil law system may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value. In addition, any new or changes in PRC laws and regulations related to foreign investment in China could affect the business environment and our ability to operate our business in China.

From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. Any administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention. Since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory provisions and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy than in more developed legal systems. These uncertainties may impede our ability to enforce the contracts we have entered into and could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published on a timely basis or at all and may have retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of any of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation. Such unpredictability towards our contractual, property and procedural rights could adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.

We may be adversely affected by the complexity, uncertainties and changes in PRC regulation of internet-related businesses and companies, and any lack of requisite approvals, licenses or permits applicable to our business may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The Chinese government extensively regulates the internet industry, including foreign ownership of, and the licensing and permit requirements pertaining to, companies in the internet industry. These internet-related laws and regulations are relatively new and evolving, and their interpretation and enforcement involve significant uncertainties. As a result, in certain circumstances it may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be deemed to be in violationupon regular monitoring of applicable laws, and regulations.

Because our business may be subject to governmental supervision and regulation by the relevant Chinese governmental authorities in many aspects of the operation of online retailing, we may be required to hold a number of licenses and permits in connection with our business operation. New laws and regulations may be adopted from time to time to require additional licenses and permits other than those we currently have. As a result, substantial uncertainties exist regarding the interpretation and implementation of current and any future PRC laws and regulations applicable to online retail businesses. If the Chinese government considers that we were operating without the proper approvals, licenses or permits, or promulgates new laws and regulations that require additional approvals or licenses or impose additional restrictions on the operation of any part of our business, it has the power, among other actions, to levy fines, confiscate our income, revoke our business licenses, or require us to discontinue our relevant business or impose restrictions on the affected portion of our business. Any of these or other regulatory actions by the Chinese governmental authorities, including issuance of official notices, change of policies, promulgation of regulations and imposition of sanctions, may adversely affect our business and have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations.

Risks Related to Network and Infrastructure

Any significant disruption in service on our platform or in our computer systems, some of which are currently hosted by third-party providers, could damage our reputation and result in a loss of users, which would harm our business and results of operations.

Our brand, reputation and ability to deliver a positive user experience depends upon the reliability of our infrastructure. We have experienced interruptions in these systems in the past, including server failures that temporarily slowed down or interfered with the performance of our websites and apps, or particular features of our websites and apps, and we may experience interruptions in the future. For example, in June 2020, we experienced a full platform outage for more than one hour due to the release of a software update that did not follow proper internal protocols. We have since updated our processes for following such protocols. Interruptions, whether due to system failures, human errors, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, denial-of-service attacks, and capacity limitations, could prevent or inhibit the ability of merchants to access, or users from completing purchases on, our websites and apps. Volume of traffic and activity on our platform spikes on certain days, and any such interruption would be particularly problematic if it were to occur at such a high-volume time. Problems with the reliability of our systems could prevent us from earning revenue and could harm our reputation. Damage to our reputation, any resulting loss of user confidencepractices, and the cost of remedying these problems could negatively affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.competitive market.

Retirement Benefits

We either lease or own our servers and have service agreements with data center providers. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorist attacks, acts of war, electronic and physical break-ins, computer viruses, earthquakes, and similar events. The occurrence of any of the foregoing events could result in damage to our systems and hardware or could cause them to fail completely, and our insurance may not cover such events or may be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. Our systems are not completely redundant, somaintain a system failure at one site could result in reduced platform functionalitySection 401(k) plan for our users, and a total failure of our systems could cause our websites or apps to be inaccessible by some or all of our users. A significant portion of our data storage, data processing and other computing services and systems is hosted by Amazon Web Services (“AWS”). AWS provides us with computing and storage capacity pursuant to an agreement that continues until terminated by either party. Problems with our third-party service providers, including AWS, or with their network providers or with the systems allocating capacity among their users, including us, could adversely affect our users’ experience. Our third-party service providers could decide to close their facilities without adequate notice. Any financial difficulties, such as bankruptcy or reorganization, faced by our third-party service providers or any of the service providers with whom they contract may have negative effects on our business, the nature and extent of which are difficult to predict. If our third-party service providers are unable to keep up with our needs for capacity, this could have an adverse effect on our business. In the event that our agreement with AWS, or other third-party service providers, is terminated, or we add additional cloud infrastructure service providers, we may experience significant costs or downtime in connection with the transfer to, or the addition of, new cloud infrastructure service providers. Any of the above circumstances or events may harm our reputation and brand, reduce the availability or usage of our platform, lead to a significant short-term loss of revenue, increase our costs, and impair our ability to attract new users or merchants, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our failure or the failure of third parties to protect our sites, networks and systems against security breaches, or otherwise to protect our confidential information, could damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our business and operating results.

We collect, maintain, transmit, and store data about our users, merchants and others, including personally identifiable information and personal data, as well as other confidential information.

We also engage third parties that store, process, and transmit these types of information on our behalf. We rely on technology licensed from third parties in an effort to securely transmit confidential and sensitive information, including credit card numbers. Advances in computer capabilities, new technological discoveries, or other developments may result in the whole or partial failure of this technology to protect transaction data or other confidential and sensitive information from being breached or compromised. In addition, ecommerce websites are often attacked through compromised credentials, including those obtained through phishing, credential stuffing, and password spraying. Our security measures, and those of our third-party service providers, may not detect or prevent all attempts to breach our systems, viruses, malicious software, break-ins, phishing attacks, accidental actions or omissions to act that create vulnerabilities, social engineering, security breaches, or other attacks and similar disruptions that may jeopardize the security of information stored in or transmitted by our websites, networks and systems or that we or such third parties otherwise maintain, including payment card systems, which may subject us to fines or higher transaction fees or limit or terminate our access to certain payment methods. We and such third parties may not be able to anticipate or prevent all types of attacks, and we may not detect such attacks until after they have already been launched. Further, techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to or sabotage systems change frequently and may not be known until launched against us or our third-party service providers. In addition, security breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues, including intentional or inadvertent actions by our employees or by third parties. These risks may increase over time as the complexity and number of technical systems and applications we use also increases.

Cyber security incidents or breaches of our security measures or those of our third-party service providers or cyber security incidents could result in unauthorized access to our websites, networks and systems; unauthorized access to and misappropriation of our data, including user information, personally identifiable information, or other confidential or proprietary information of ours or of third parties; viruses, worms, spyware, or other malware being served from our websites, networks, or systems; deletion or modification of content or the display of unauthorized content on our sites; interruption, disruption, or malfunction of operations; costs relating to breach remediation, deployment of additional personnel and protection technologies, response to governmental investigations and media inquiries and coverage; engagement of third-party experts and consultants; litigation, regulatory action and other potential liabilities. Further, due to the political uncertainty involving Russia and Ukraine, there is an increased likelihood that escalation of tensions could result in cyber attacks that could either directly or indirectly impact our operations. Social engineering, phishing, malware, and similar attacks and threats of denial-of-service attacks could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Additionally, from time to time, our merchants’ and users’ accounts have been subject to unauthorized access by third parties, including through illicit purchase of usernames and passwords by bad actors. If any of these breaches of security should occur, our reputation and brand could be damaged, our business may suffer, we could be required to expend significant capital and other resources to alleviate problems caused by such breaches, and we could be exposed to a risk of loss, litigation or regulatory action and possible liability. We cannot guarantee that recovery protocols and backup systems will be sufficient to prevent data loss. Actual or anticipated attacks may cause us to incur increasing costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees and engage third-party experts and consultants. In addition, any party who is able to illicitly obtain a user or merchant password could access the user or merchant’s transaction data or personal information, resulting in the perception that our systems are insecure.

Any compromise or breach of our security measures, or those of our third-party service providers, could violate applicable privacy, data protection, data security, network and information systems security and other laws and cause significant legal and financial exposure (including costs for technical teams to investigate and remediate such incidents), adverse publicity and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects. We devote significant resources to protect against security breaches and we may need to devote more resources in the future to address problems caused by breaches, including notifying affected users and responding to any resulting litigation, which in turn, diverts resources from the growth and expansion of our business.

We are subject to governmental regulation and other legal obligations related to privacy, data protection, information security, and consumer protection. If we are unable to comply with these, we may be subject to governmental enforcement actions, litigation, fines and penalties, or adverse publicity.

We collect personally identifiable information and other data from users and prospective users. We use this information to provide services and relevant products to our users, to support, expand and improve our business, and to tailor our marketing and advertising efforts. We may also share users’ personal data with certain third parties as authorized by the user or as described in our privacy policy.

As a result, we are subject to governmental regulation and other legal obligations related to the protection of confidential and sensitive data (including personally identifiable information and personal data), privacy, information security and consumer protection in certain countries where we do business and there has been and will continue to be a significant increase globally in such laws that restrict or control the use of personal data.

In Europe, where the data privacy and information security regime underwent a significant change in 2018, the legal environment related to personal data continues to evolve and companies like us that process personal data from large numbers of individuals are subject to increasing regulatory scrutiny. The General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) implemented more stringent operational requirements for our use of personal data. These more stringent requirements include expanded disclosures to tell our users about how we may use their personal data, increased controls on profiling users and increased rights for users to access, control and delete their personal data. In addition, there are mandatory data breach notification requirements and significantly increased penalties of the greater of €20 million or 4% of global turnover for the preceding financial year.

Although there are legal mechanisms to allow for the transfer of personal data from the United Kingdom, EEA and Switzerland to the United States, uncertainty about compliance with such data protection laws remains and such mechanisms may not be available or applicable with respect to the personal data processing activities necessary to research, develop and market our products and services. For example, legal challenges in Europe to the mechanisms allowing companies to transfer personal data from the EEA to the United States could result in further limitations on the ability to transfer personal data across borders, particularly if governments are unable or unwilling to reach new or maintain existing agreements that support cross-border data transfers, such as the EU-U.S. and Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks. Specifically, on July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union invalidated Decision 2016/1250 on the adequacy of the protection provided by the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework (“Schrems II” decision). To the extent that we or our service providers were to rely on the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, we may not be able to do so in the future, which could increase our costs and limit our ability to process personal data from the European Union. The Schrems II decision also cast doubt on the ability to use one of the primary alternatives to the Privacy Shield, namely, the European Commission’s Standard Contractual Clauses, to lawfully transfer personal data from Europe to the United States and most other countries. In November 2020, the European Commission released a draft of revised Standard Contractual Clauses, and, in January 2021, the European Data Protection Board and the European Data Protection Supervisor issued a joint opinion regarding these revised Standard Contractual Clauses. These revised Standard Contractual Clauses and related developments, opinions, and guidance from European regulators may significantly increase our liability under, and compliance costs related to, cross-border data transfers and the GDPR, and may impact our ability to operate and deliver services in the European Economic Area.

Following its exit from the European Union in January 2020, the United Kingdom implemented legislation referred to as the “UK-GDPR” which substantially aligns with requirements and penalties under the EU GDPR. We may face similar costs, risks, and operational impacts in complying with the UK-GDPR as we face in complying with the EU GDPR.  

In recent years, U.S. and European lawmakers and regulators have expressed concern over the use of third-party cookies and similar technologies for online behavioral advertising, and laws in this area are also under reform. In the European Union, current national laws that implement the ePrivacy Directive will be replaced by an EU regulation known as the ePrivacy Regulation. The draft ePrivacy Regulation retains existing informed consent conditions and also imposes the strict opt-in marketing rules on direct marketing that is “presented” on a web page rather than sent by email, alters rules on third-party cookies and similar technology and significantly increases penalties for breach of the rules. Regulation of cookies and similar technologies may lead to broader restrictions on our marketing and personalization activities and may negatively impact the effectiveness of our marketing. Such regulations may also increase regulatory scrutiny and increase potential civil liability under data protection or consumer protection laws. The ePrivacy Regulations draft also advocates the development of browsers that block cookies by default. These developments could impair our ability to collect user information, including personal data and usage information, that helps us provide more targeted advertising to our current and prospective users, which could adversely affect our business, given our use of cookies and similar technologies to target our marketing and personalize the user experience. We may incur liabilities, expenses, costs, and other operational losses under GDPR and applicable EU Member States and the U.K. privacy laws in connection with any measures we take to comply with them.

As interpretation of both the ePrivacy Regulation and GDPR develop, we could incur substantial costs to comply with these regulations. The changes could require significant systems changes, limit the effectiveness of our marketing activities, adversely affect our margins, increase costs and subject us to additional liabilities.

In the United States, federal and various state governments have adopted or are considering, laws, guidelines or rules for the collection, distribution, use and storage of information collected from or about users or their devices. For example, California passed the California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”), which became effective on January 1, 2020 and introduced substantial changes to privacy law for businesses that collect personal information from California residents. The CCPA creates individual privacy rights for California consumers and increases the privacy and security obligations of entities handling certain personal information. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. And on November 3, 2020, California passed the California Privacy Rights Act (the “CPRA”). The CPRA, which will not be fully in effect until January 1, 2023, amends and expands the CCPA, including the introduction of sensitive personal information as a new regulated dataset in California that is subject to new disclosure and purpose limitation requirements. Other states may decide to adopt similar laws in the future. Additionally, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and many state attorneys general are applying federal and state consumer protection laws, to impose standards for the online collection, use and dissemination of data. Furthermore, these obligations may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with other requirements or our practices.

In September 2021 and November 2021, the People’s Republic of China made effective its new Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law, respectively. While there are many aspects of these laws that are still yet-to-be-defined, they impose complex and far-reaching requirements related to cybersecurity and the processing of personal data, both within China and extraterritorially. Potential penalties under the Personal Information Protection Law are severe, at up to the greater of 5% of global revenue or $7.7 million. The precise scope and impact of these laws is still unclear but they could significantly increase our compliance costs, cause us to suffer monetary penalties, or otherwise adversely impact our business and operations.

Many data protection regimes apply based on where a user is located, and as we expand our platform and new laws are enacted or existing laws change, we may be subject to new laws, regulations or standards or new interpretations of existing laws, regulations or standards, including those in the areas of data security, data privacy and regulation of email providers and those that require localization of certain data, which could require us to incur additional costs and restrict our business operations. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with rapidly evolving privacy or security laws policies (including our own stated privacy policies), legal obligations or industry standards or any security incident that results in the unauthorized release or transfer of personally identifiable information or other user data may result in governmental enforcement actions, litigation (including user class actions), fines and penalties or adverse publicity and could cause our users to lose trust in us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

A failure to comply with current laws, rules and regulations or changes to such laws, rules and regulations and other legal uncertainties may adversely affect our business, financial performance, results of operations or business growth.

Our business and financial performance could be adversely affected by unfavorable changes in or interpretations of existing laws, rules, and regulations or the promulgation of new laws, rules, and regulations applicable to us and our business, including those relating to the internet and ecommerce, internet advertising and price display, consumer protection, anti-corruption, economic and trade sanctions, tax, payments, banking, data security, network and information systems security, data protection and privacy. As a result, regulatory authorities could prevent or temporarily suspend us from carrying on some or all of our activities or otherwise penalize us if our practices were found not to comply with applicable regulatory or licensing requirements or any binding interpretation of such requirements. Unfavorable changes or interpretations could decrease demand for our services, limit marketing methods and capabilities, affect our margins, increase costs or subject us to additional liabilities. For example, as a result of the initial outbreak of COVID-19, consumer protection authorities demanded rapid and decisive changes in the way that Wish screens and handles product listings that potentially violate various laws, including emergency price caps on certain items. We believe we have legal grounds to satisfy current requests or prevail against associated fines and penalties, and we intend to vigorously defend such fines and penalties.

Additionally, there are, and will likely continue to be, an increasing number of laws and regulations pertaining to the internet and ecommerce that may relate to liability for information retrieved from or transmitted over the internet, display of certain taxes and fees, online editorial and user-generated content, user privacy, data security, network and information systems security, behavioral targeting and online advertising, taxation, liability for third-party activities, quality of services and consumer protection. For example, the European Digital Services Act (DSA) which is expected to take effect later in 2022 through 2023, intends to impose new legal obligations on online marketplaces operating in Europe in terms of both verifying and ensuring the accuracy of the information, safety, and authenticity of products posted by third-party merchants. The DSA also updates the responsibilities and liabilities of digital online services, such as the rules on illegal content, notice-and-takedown, and online targeted advertising, bringing new powers to fine in-scope eligible companies up to 6% of their global annual turnover. Some open questions in the industry still remain as to what impact the pending DSA's proactive monitoring and content moderation obligations will have on online marketplace platforms' existing liability safe harbor protections available currently under the European Union's already-in-existence eCommerce Directive (ECD). In addition, the European Union’s Market Surveillance Regulation, which took effect in July 2021, placed new obligations on online marketplaces that perform certain “fulfilment service provider” activities in Europe and was designed to reduce the availability of non-compliant products in Europe when offered by sellers outside of the region that either had or did not have an appointed authorized product compliance representative in Europe. Denmark has passed a law placing new burdens on marketplaces and giving its regulators the right to request fines and shutdowns where marketplaces are consistently unsuccessful in screening products that are unsafe or unlawful. Furthermore, the growth and development of ecommerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws and more aggressive enforcement efforts, which may impose additional burdens on online businesses generally.

Likewise, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls, the U.S. Department of State, as well as other foreign regulatory authorities continue to enforce economic and trade regulations and anti-corruption laws, across industries. U.S. trade sanctions relate to transactions with designated foreign countries and territories, including Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria and the Crimea region of Ukraine, as well as specifically targeted individuals and entities that are identified on United States’ and other blacklists, and those owned by them or those acting on their behalf. Further, In February 2022, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. and other countries announced sanctions against Russia. The U.S. and other countries could impose wider sanctions and take other actions should the conflict further escalate. While it is difficult to anticipate the impact the sanctions announced to date may have on the Company, any further sanctions imposed or actions taken by the U.S. or other countries, and any retaliatory measures by Russia in response, could have an adverse effect on our business.

Anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the U.K. Bribery Act, generally prohibit direct or indirect corrupt payments to government officials and, under certain laws, to private persons to obtain or retain business or an improper business advantage. Although we have policies and procedures in place designed to promote compliance with these laws and regulations, our employees, partners, or agents could take actions in contravention of our policies and procedures or violate applicable laws or regulations. In the event our controls should fail, or we are found to be not in compliance for other reasons, we could be subject to monetary damages, civil and criminal monetary penalties, withdrawal of business licenses or permits, litigation and damage to our reputation and the value of our brand.

Additionally, the law relating to liability of online service providers is currently unsettled. Lawmakers and governmental agencies have in the past and could in the future require changes in the way our business is conducted, including with explicit obligations to inspect and screen content and products or implicit obligations that might stem from increased legal liability for online service providers. Unfavorable regulations, laws, decisions, or interpretations by government or regulatory authorities applying those laws and regulations, or inquiries, investigations, or enforcement actions threatened or initiated by them, could cause us to incur substantial costs, expose us to unanticipated civil and criminal liability or penalties (including substantial monetary fines), increase our cost of doing business, require us to change our business practices in a manner materially adverse to our business, damage our reputation, impede our growth, or otherwise have a material effect on our operations.

Risk Related to Our Intellectual Property

We may be unable to protect our intellectual property adequately.

Our intellectual property is an essential asset of our business, and our success is dependent, in part, upon protecting our intellectual property. To establish and protect our intellectual property rights, we rely on a combination of trade secret, copyright, trademark and, to a lesser extent, patent laws, as well as confidentiality protection procedures and contractual provisions. The efforts we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not be sufficient or effective. We generally do not elect to register our copyrights, relying instead on the laws protecting unregistered intellectual property, which may not be sufficient. We rely on both registered and unregistered trademarks, which may not always be comprehensive in scope. In addition, our copyrights and trademarks, whether or not registered, and patents may be held invalid or unenforceable if challenged and may be of limited territorial reach. Moreover, effective trademark, copyright, patent and trade secret protection may not be available or commercially feasible in every country in which we conduct business. Further, intellectual property law, including statutory and case law, particularly in the United States, including our named executive officers. The Section 401(k) plan is constantly developing, and any changes in the law could make it harder for usintended to enforce our rights. While we have obtained or applied for patent protection with respect to some of our intellectual property, we generally do not rely on patents as a principal means of protecting intellectual property. We make business decisions about when to seek patent protection for a particular technology and when to rely upon trade secret protection, and the approach we select may ultimately prove to be inadequate. To the extent we do seek patent protection, any U.S. or other patents issued to us may not be sufficiently broad to protect our proprietary technologies.

We may be subject to claims that items listed on our platform are counterfeit, infringing or illegal, which may harm our business.

We frequently receive communications alleging that items listed on our platform infringe third-party copyrights, trademarks, or other intellectual property rights. We have intellectual property complaint and take-down procedures in place to address these communications, and we believe such procedures are important to promote confidence in our platform and provide users reassurance in the products they are purchasing. We follow these procedures to review complaints and relevant facts to determine the appropriate action, which may include removal of the item from our platform and, in certain cases, prohibiting merchants from participating in our platform who repeatedly violate our policies.

Our procedures may not effectively reduce or eliminate our liability. In particular, we may be subject to civil or criminal liability for activities carried out by merchants on our platform, especially outside the United States where laws may offer less protection for intermediaries and platforms than the United States. Under current U.S. copyright law, we may benefit from statutory safe harbor provisions that protect us from copyright liability for content posted on our platform by our merchants and users. However, trademark and patent laws do not include similar statutory provisions, and liability for these forms of intellectual property is often determined by court decisions. These safe harbors and court rulings may change unfavorably. In that event, we may be held secondarily liable for the intellectual property infringement of merchants on our platform. We may also be directly liable for the inventory we purchase ourselves that we sell on our platform.

In addition, allegations of infringement of intellectual property rights, including but not limited to counterfeit items, have resulted in actual litigation from time to time by rights owners against merchants. These and similar suits have resulted in the freezing of merchant accounts or the shutdown of merchant storefronts on our platform, which can adversely impact revenue in the short-term, and may require us to spend substantial resources to comply with court orders. We may also incur costs responding to subpoenas from governmental authorities regarding illegal or counterfeit products listed for sale on our platform. In addition, we may receive media attention relating to the listing or sale of illegal or counterfeit goods, which could damage our reputation, diminish the value of our brand, and make users and merchants reluctant to use our platform.

Regardless of the validity of any claims made against us, we may incur significant costs and efforts to defend against or settle them.

Under our standard form agreements, we require our merchants to indemnify us for any losses we suffer or any costs that we incur due to any products sold by these merchants. However, we may not be able to successfully enforce our contractual rights and may need to initiate costly and lengthy legal proceedings to protect our rights.

We may be subject to intellectual property claims, which are extremely costly to defend, could require us to pay significant damages and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.

Companies in the internet and technology industries are frequently subject to litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We periodically receive communications that claim we have infringed, misappropriated or misused others’ intellectual property rights. To the extent we gain greater public recognition, we may face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property claims. Third parties may have intellectual property rights that cover significant aspects of our technologies or business methods and prevent us from expanding our offerings. Any intellectual property claim against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming and expensive to settle or litigate and could divert the attention of our management. Litigation regarding intellectual property rights is inherently uncertain due to the complex issues involved, and we may not be successful in defending ourselves in such matters.

In addition, some of our competitors have extensive portfolios of issued patents. In a patent infringement claim against us, we may assert, as a defense, that we do not infringe the relevant patent claims, that the patent is invalid, or both. The strength of our defenses will depend on the patents asserted, the interpretation of these patents, and our ability to invalidate the asserted patents. However, we could be unsuccessful in advancing non-infringement and/or invalidity arguments in our defense. In the United States, issued patents enjoy a presumption of validity, and the party challenging the validity of a patent claim must present clear and convincing evidence of invalidity, which is a high burden of proof. Conversely, the patent owner need only prove infringement by a preponderance of the evidence, which Is a lower burden of proof. We may be unaware of the intellectual property rights that others may claim cover some or all of our technology or services. Because patent applications can take years to issue and are often afforded confidentiality for some period of time, there may currently be pending applications, unknown to us, that later result in issued patents that could cover one or more of our products.

Many potential litigants, including some of our competitors and patent holding companies, have the ability to dedicate substantial resources to enforcing their intellectual property rights. Moreover, our patents may provide little or no deterrence in litigation involving patent holding companies or other adverse patent owners that have no relevant product revenue. Any claims successfully brought against us could subject us to significant liability for damages and we may be required to stop using technology or other intellectual property alleged to be in violation of a third-party’s rights in jurisdictions where we do business. We also might be required to enter into costly settlement agreements or seek a license for third-party intellectual property. Even if a license is available, we could be required to pay significant royalties or submit to unreasonable terms, which would increase our operating expenses. We may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant time and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for any allegedly infringing aspect of our business, we would be forced to limit our service and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results could harm our business.

Our software is highly complex and may contain undetected errors.

The software and code underlying our platform is highly interconnected and complex and may contain undetected errors or vulnerabilities, some of which may only be discovered after the code has been released. We typically release software code daily and this practice may result in the more frequent introduction of errors or vulnerabilities into the software underlying our platform, which can impact the user and merchant experience on our platform. Additionally, due to the interconnected nature of the software underlying our platform, updates to certain parts of our code, including changes to our website or mobile app or third-party APIs on which our website and mobile app rely, could have an unintended impact on other sections of our code, which may result in errors or vulnerabilities to our platform. Any errors or vulnerabilities discovered in our code after release could result in damage to our reputation, loss of our merchants or users, loss of revenue, or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our growth prospects and our business.

Our use of open source software may pose particular risks to our proprietary software and systems.

We use open source software in our proprietary software and systems and will use open source software in the future. The licenses applicable to our use of open source software may require that source code that is developed using open source software be made available to the public and that any modifications or derivative works to certain open source software continue to be licensedqualify under open source licenses. From time to time, we may face claims from third parties claiming infringement of their intellectual property rights, or demanding the release or license of the open source software or derivative works that we developed using such software (which could include our proprietary source code) or otherwise seeking to enforce the terms of the applicable open source license. These claims could result in litigation and could require us to purchase a costly license, publicly release the affected portions of our source code, be limited in or cease using the implicated software unless and until we can re-engineer such software to avoid infringement or change the use of, or remove, the implicated open source software. Our use of open source software may also present additional security risks because the source code for open source software is publicly available, which may make it easier for hackers and other third parties to determine how to breach our website and systems that rely on open source software. Any of these risks could be difficult to eliminate or manage, and, if not addressed, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.

Risks Related to Our Taxes and Financial Position

Our business and our merchants and users may be subject to sales and other taxes and these taxes may negatively impact our revenue and growth.

The application of indirect taxes, such as sales and use tax, value-added tax, provincial taxes, goods and services tax, business tax and gross receipt tax to our business and to our merchants is a complex and evolving issue. In addition, governments are increasingly looking for ways to increase revenue, which has resulted in discussions about new legislative action to increase tax revenue, including through indirect taxes.

Significant judgment and expertise is required to evaluate applicable tax obligations. As a result, amounts recognized may be subject to adjustments by the relevant tax authorities. In many cases, the ultimate tax determination is uncertain because it is not clear how new and existing statutes might apply to our business or to the businesses of our merchants. One or more states, the federal government or other countries may seek to impose additional reporting, recordkeeping or indirect tax collection obligations on businesses like ours that facilitate ecommerce.

State and local taxing authorities in the United States have identified ecommerce platforms as a means to calculate, collect and remit indirect taxes for transactions taking place over the internet. U.S. states began enacting related legislation with effective dates in early 2018 and in June 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court held in South Dakota v. Wayfair that a U.S. state may require an ecommerce platform to collect sales taxes imposed by the state in which the buyer is located, even if the retailer has no physical presence in that state, thus permitting a wider enforcement of such sales tax collection requirements. All U.S. states have since followed suit in enacting similar legislation and proposed legislation is in process in the few remaining states.

Outside of the United States, the application of value added tax or other indirect taxes on ecommerce providers continues to evolve. An increasing number of jurisdictions are legislating or have adopted laws that impose new taxes, including revenue-based taxes that target ecommerce and the remote selling of goods. These laws include new obligations to collect sales, consumption, value added, or similar taxes on ecommerce platform and remote sellers, or other requirements that may result in liability for third-party obligations. As a result of Brexit, the U.K. began imposing value added tax on ecommerce platform effective January 2021, and the European Union abolished its low value goods exemption effective July 2021 and require online marketplace facilitators to collect and remit value added tax. Our business could be adversely affected by additional taxes that focus on marketplace service revenue.

Additionally, existing and new tax laws and legislation could require us or our merchants to incur substantial costs in order to comply, including costs associated with legal advice, tax calculation, collection, remittance and audit requirements, which could make selling in such markets less attractive and could adversely affect our business. Further, these laws can be applied prospectively or retroactively. Noncompliance with new laws may result in fines or penalties. It is possible we may not have sufficient notice to create and adopt processes to properly comply with new reporting or collection obligations by the effective date.

Our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected by additional taxes or increasing taxes of this nature imposed on us prospectively or retroactively, or additional taxes or penalties resulting from the failure to comply with any collection obligations or failure to provide information about our users, merchants or other third parties for tax reporting purposes to various government agencies.

We may experience fluctuations in various tax related obligations.

We are subject to various taxes in the United States and in many other jurisdictions. We record these taxes based on current tax payment calculations and estimates of tax liabilities, which may include estimates of probable settlements of tax audits. The determination of these liabilities requires estimation and significant judgment and the ultimate determination is uncertain. At any time, multiple tax years could be subject to audit by various taxing jurisdictions. As a result, we could be subject to higher than anticipated tax liabilities as well as ongoing variability in our quarterly tax rates related to potential audits and as exposures are re-evaluated. While we have estimated accruals that we believe are reasonable to cover potential exposures, the reserves may ultimately not be sufficient and additional cash outflows may result. Fluctuations in our tax obligations could adversely affect our business.

We may not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss carryforwards, and other tax attributes, which could adversely affect our profitability.

As of December 31, 2021, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) available to reduce future taxable income, if any, of $886 million that begin to expire in 2030 and continue to expire through 2037 and $1.3 billion that have an unlimited carryover period. As of December 31, 2021, we had state NOLs available to reduce future taxable income, if any, of $4.3 billion that begin to expire in 2026 and continue to expire through 2041 and $1.3 billion that have an unlimited carryover period. Under legislation enacted in 2017, informally titled the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), as modified by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), unused U.S. federal NOLs generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, will not expire and may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such federal NOLs in tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, is limited to 80% of taxable income. It is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the Tax Act or the CARES Act. In addition, the utilization of NOLs and other tax attributes to offset future taxable income or taxes may be subject to limitations under Sections 382 and 383Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), so that contributions to the plan by employees or by us, and similar state statutesthe investment earnings thereon, are not taxable to the employees until withdrawn, and so that contributions made by us, if any, will be deductible by us when made. Currently, we do not provide company matching contributions to participants in the Section 401(k) plan. Additionally, the Section 401(k) plan also allows for employee contributions to be made on an after-tax basis in the form of Roth contributions. These contributions are intended to qualify under Section 402A of the Code and are designated to grow with tax-free earnings and are distributed at retirement without triggering any future income tax liability.

We do not provide pension or other defined benefit plan arrangements for our named executive officers or other employees, nor do we provide any nonqualified defined contribution or other deferred compensation plans to any of our employees, except where required by local law.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

Currently, we do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of our executive compensation program. Accordingly, we do not provide significant perquisites or other personal benefits to our named executive officers except as generally made available to our employees or in situations where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual in the performance of his or her duties, to make him or her more efficient and effective, and for recruitment and retention purposes. During 2023, none of our named executive officers received perquisites or other personal benefits that were, in the aggregate, $10,000 or more for each individual.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2023 Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2023, including the number of shares subject to each award and, where applicable, the exercise price per share. The vesting schedule applicable to each outstanding award is described in the footnotes to the table below.

12

Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

We have entered into written employment offer letters with each of our named executive officers. We believe that these arrangements were necessary to secure the service of these individuals in a highly competitive job market. Each of these employment offer letters does not have a specific term, provides for “at will” employment (meaning that either we or the named executive officer may terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause, and with or without notice) and generally sets forth the named executive officer’s initial base salary, eligibility to participate in our standard employee health and welfare benefit plans and programs, and includes a recommendation for an equity award to be approved by our Compensation Committee or our Board of Directors. In addition, each of these employment offer letters required the named executive officer to execute our standard Proprietary (Confidential) Information and Invention Assignment Agreement.

Severance Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

We entered into severance and change in control agreements with each of our named executive officers—with Mr. Yan in February 2023 in connection with his transition to our permanent Chief Executive Officer role, with Ms. Liu in connection her commencement of employment with us in 2021, and with Mr. Monico in connection with his appointment to Chief Product Officer in July 2023.

The terms of the severance and change in control agreements are described below, as in effect prior to the named executive officer’s termination of employment, as applicable.

Termination Not in Connection with a Change in Control

Pursuant to his severance and change in control agreement, Mr. Yan was eligible to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to 12 months of his base salary and an additional lump sum cash payment equal to 12 months of his benefit premiums if he was terminated by the Company without cause or he resigned for good reason. If the employment of one of our other named executive officers was terminated by the Company without cause or if such officer resigned for good reason, such officer was eligible to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to six months of their base salary, an additional lump sum cash payment equal to six months of their benefit premiums, and 12 months accelerated vesting of their time-based equity awards.

13

Termination in Connection with a Change in Control

Pursuant to his severance and change in control agreement, Mr. Yan was eligible to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to 24 months of his base salary, an additional lump sum cash payment equal to 24 months of his benefit premiums, and full acceleration of his time-based equity awards if his employment was terminated by the Company without cause or he resigned for good reason, in either case, within three months prior to or 12 months after a change in control. If the employment of one of our other named executive officers was terminated by the Company without cause or if such officer resigned for good reason, in either case within three months prior to or 12 months after a change in control, such officer would be eligible to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to 12 months of the officer’s base salary, an additional lump sum cash payment equal to 12 months of the officer’s benefit premiums, and full acceleration of the officer’s time-based equity awards.

For purposes of the severance and change in control agreements, the terms “cause,” “change in control,” and “good reason” have the following meanings:

“Cause” means an executive officer’s willful and intentional unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information or trade secrets which causes material harm, material breach of any agreement with us, material failure to comply with our written policies or rules, conviction of a felony, gross negligence or willful misconduct, continuing failure to perform assigned duties (other than as a result of ownership changes that have occurreda disability) or could occurfailure to cooperate in good faith with a governmental or internal investigation.

“Good Reason” means a material diminution in the future. Additionally, portionsnature or scope of these NOLs could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. In addition, at the state level, there may be periods during which the use of net operating losses is suspendedexecutive officer’s responsibilities, authority, powers, functions or otherwise limited. For example, California recently imposed limits on the usability of California state NOLs to offset taxable income in tax years beginning after 2019 and before 2023. As a result, even if we attain profitability, we may be unable to useduties, a material portionreduction in the executive officer’s base salary, or a requirement that the executive officer relocate more than 50 miles.

“Change in Control” means any person (other than Piotr Szulczewski) acquires ownership of more than 50% of our NOLs and other tax attributes, which could adversely affect our future cash flows, which could adversely affect our profitability.

We may need additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable termsvoting stock, a sale of all or at all.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, together with cash generated from our operations, will be enough to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. However, we may require additional cash resources due to changes in business conditions or other developments, such as acquisitions or investments we may decide to pursue. Any debt financing that we may secure in the future could result in additional operating and financial covenants that would limit or restrict our ability to take certain actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. It is also possible that financing may not be available to us in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Risks Related to Our Class A Common Stock

The pricesubstantially all of our Class A common stock has been and continues to be volatile. Declines in the priceassets, consummation of our Class A common stock has resulted in and could subject us to future litigation.

Prior to our IPO in December 2020, there was no public market for our Class A common stock. If trading in our Class A common stock is not active, investors and other stockholders may not be able to sell their shares quickly, at the market price or at all. In addition, the market price of our Class A common stock has fluctuated and declined and may continue to fluctuate or decline substantially. Further, the trading pricesa merger of the securities of technology companies have historically been highly volatile. Accordingly, the price ofCompany with or into another entity if our Class A commoncapital stock has been subject to wide fluctuations and could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations for many reasons, many of which are beyond our control, including those described in this “Risk Factors” section and others such as:

In addition, if the market for technology stocks or the stock market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, the price of our Class A common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, results of operations or financial condition. The price of our Class A common stock might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies, even if those events do not directly affect us. We have been named in lawsuits and may be subject to both ongoing litigation and other requests related to our stock price/performance and/or Board performance and independence. This could result in securities litigation. If we are the subject of additional securities class actions, it could result in substantial costs and could divert our management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect our business. Additionally, the price of our Class A common stock may be volatile and may decline regardless of our operating performance and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Our actual operating results may differ significantly from our outlook.

From time to time, we release outlook (or guidance) in our quarterly earnings conference calls, quarterly earnings releases, or otherwise, regarding our future financial performance that represents our management’s estimates as of the date of release. This outlook, which includes forward-looking statements, is based on projections prepared by our management. This outlook is not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) regarding projections or the SEC regarding forward-looking statements, and neither our independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent expert or outside party compiles or examines the projections. Accordingly, no such person will express any opinion or any other form of assurance with respect to the projections.

Projections are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, are inherently subject to significant business, industry, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to future business decisions, some of which will change. The principal reason that we release outlook is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business expectations with analysts and investors. We do not accept any responsibility for any projections or reports published by any such third parties.

Outlook is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the outlook furnished by us will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, our outlook is only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date of release. Actual results may vary and the variations may be material. We expressly disclaim any obligations to update or revise any outlook, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of the foregoing, investors are urged to put the outlook in context and not place undue reliance on it.

Any failure to successfully implement our operating strategy or the occurrence of any of the events or circumstances set forth in this “Risk Factors” section in this Form 10-K could result in the actual operating results being different from our outlook, and the differences may be adverse and material.

Our directors, executive officers and principal stockholders beneficially own a substantial percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters subject to stockholder approval.

Our directors, executive officers, greaterless than 5% stockholders and their respective affiliates held in the aggregate approximately 70%50% of the voting power of the surviving entity or its parent, or certain changes in the composition of our outstanding capital stockBoard of Directors.

Employment Transitions in 2023 and 2024

Effective as of December 31, 2021. In addition, Piotr Szulczewski, our founder and memberthe closing of the Board was able to exercise voting rights with respect to an aggregate of approximately 63 million shares of our capital stock, which represented approximately 66% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stockAsset Sale on April 19, 2024, Messrs. Yan and Monico and Ms. Liu no longer serve as of December 31, 2021. Therefore, these stockholders will continue to have the ability to influence us through their ownership position. For example, our CEO and these stockholders would be able to control elections of directors, amendments of our charter documents or approval of any merger, sale of assets or other major corporate transaction. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our capital stock that other stockholders may feel are in their best interests.

The dual class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting control with certain stockholders, in particular, our former Chief Executive Officer, which will limit investors’ ability to influence the outcome of important transactions, including a change in control.

Our Class B common stock has 20 votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. Stockholders who held shares of Class B common stock, including our executive officers employees, and directorseach received the severance payments and their affiliates, together held approximately 70% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2021. This includes shares subject to proxies held by Mr. Szulczewski, which represented approximately 66% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock as of December 31, 2021. Because of the 20-to-one voting ratio between our Class B and Class A common stock, the holders of our Class B common stock collectively control a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock and therefore are able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval so long as the shares of Class B common stock represent at least 5% of all outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock. This concentrated control limits or precludes your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future.

Future transfers by holders of Class B common stock will generally result in those shares converting to Class A common stock, subject to limited exceptions. The conversion of Class B common stock to Class A common stock will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common stock who retain their shares in the long term. If, for example, Mr. Szulczewski retains a significant portion of his holdings of Class B common stock for an extended period of time, he could, in the future, continue to control a majority of the combined voting power of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock.

In addition, in July 2017, FTSE Russell and Standard & Poor’s announced that they would cease to allow most newly public companies utilizing dual or multi-class capital structures to be includedbenefits set forth in their indices. Affected indices include the Russell 2000respective severance and the S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400, and S&P SmallCap 600, which together make up the S&P Composite 1500. Under the announced policies, our multi-class capital structure would make us ineligiblechange in control agreements for inclusiontermination in any of these indices, and as a result, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, and other investment vehicles that attempt to passively track these indices will not be investing in our stock. It is as of yet unclear what effect, if any, they will have on the valuations of publicly traded companies excluded from the indices, but it is possible that they may depress these valuations compared to those of other similar companies that are included.

Future sales and issuances of our Class A common stock or rights to purchase Class A common stock could result in additional dilution to our stockholders and could cause the price of our Class A common stock to decline.

We may issue additional Class A common stock, convertible securities or other equity. We also expect to issue Class A common stock to our employees, directors and other service providers pursuant to our equity incentive plans and Class B common stockconnection with respect to awards currently outstanding under our 2010 Stock Plan. Such issuances could be dilutive to investors and could cause the price of our Class A common stock to decline. New investors in such issuances could also receive rights senior to those of holders of our Class A common stock.

The price of our Class A common stock could decline if there are substantial sales of our Class A common stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers, employees, and significant stockholders, or when there is a large number of shares of our Class A common stock available for sale.

The market price of the shares of our Class A common stock could decline as a result of the sale of a substantial number of our shares of common stock in the public market or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company more difficult, could limit attempts to make changes in our management and could depress the price of our Class A common stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control, of our company or limiting changes in our management. Among other things, they provide:as described above.

These provisions may delay or prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace members of our management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management. In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) may delay or prevent a change in control of our company. Section 203 imposes certain restrictions on mergers, business combinationsCorporate Governance Policies

Derivative Securities and other transactions between us and holders of 15% or more of our common stock. Anti-takeover provisions could depress the price of our common stock by acting to delay or prevent a change in control of our company.

Hedging Transactions

Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States of America are the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us orinsider trading policy prohibits transactions by our directors, officers and other employees and their designees in publicly-traded options, such as puts and calls, and other derivative securities with respect to our Company’s securities. This prohibition extends to any hedging or employees.

similar transaction designed to decrease the risks associated with holding Company securities. Stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, and other securities issued pursuant to our Company benefit plans or other compensatory arrangements with our Company are not subject to this prohibition. Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States of America are the exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us orinsider trading policy also prohibits our directors, officers, or employees. Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for: (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of us; (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty; (iii) any action arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, our certificate of incorporation or bylaws (as either may be amendedand other employees and their designees from time to time); (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws; or (v) any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine.pledging Company securities as collateral for loans.

This provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act. Furthermore, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federalStock Ownership Guidelines and state courts over all such Securities Act actions. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our certificate of incorporation further provides that the U.S. federal district courts are the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. While the Delaware courts have determined that such choice of forum provisions are facially valid, a stockholder may nevertheless seek to bring a claim in a venue other than those designated in the exclusive forum provisions. In such instance, we would expect to vigorously assert the validity and enforceability of the exclusive forum provisions of our certificate of incorporation. This may require significant additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions and there can be no assurance that the provisions will be enforced by a court in those other jurisdictions.

These exclusive-forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees. If a court were to find either exclusive forum provision of our certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable to or unenforceable in an action, we may incur further significant additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, all of which could seriously harm our business. Requirements

We do not intend to pay dividends oncurrently have any stock ownership requirements for our capital stock, so any returns will be limited to increases inexecutive officers and the valuenon-employee members of our Class A common stock.Board of Directors, however, it is strongly encouraged.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business. Accordingly, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility contain, and any future credit facility or financing we obtain may contain, terms prohibiting or limiting the amount of dividends that may be declared or paid on our common stock. Any return to stockholders will therefore be limited to increases in the price of our Class A common stock, if any.14

General Risk Factors

Clawback Policy

Our quarterly and annual operating results may fluctuate, which could cause our stock price to decline.

Our quarterly and annual operating results may fluctuate for a variety of reasons, many of whichnamed executive officers are beyond our control. These reasons include those described in this “Risk Factors” section as well as the following:

Fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results may cause those results to fall below the expectations of analysts or investors, which could cause the price of our Class A common stock to decline. Fluctuations in our results could also cause a number of other problems. For example, analysts or investors might change their models for valuing our Class A common stock, we could experience short-term liquidity issues, our ability to retain or attract key personnel may diminish, and other unanticipated issues may arise.

In addition, we believe that our quarterly and annual operating results may vary in the future and that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful. For example, our historical growth may have overshadowed the seasonal effects on our historical operating results. These seasonal effects may become more pronounced over time, which could also cause our operating results to fluctuate. You should not rely on the results of one quarter or one year as an indication of future performance.

Seasonality may cause fluctuations in our operating results.

Our operating results are seasonal in nature because our transaction volume is affected by traditional retail selling periods that impact sales on our platform. Our historical growth may have reduced or outweighed seasonal effects on our past financial results. However, seasonal effects may become more pronounced over time, which could cause fluctuations in our financial results. For example, sales on our platform have historically peaked in the fall and user activity begins to slow down in December as it may be too late to place orders for holiday delivery. Additionally, we have historically experienced some slowdown in merchant activity in late January or early February duesubject to our China-based merchants celebratingclawback policy which, consistent with SEC and Nasdaq rules, requires the Chinese New Year holiday.

Catastrophic events may disrupt our business.

Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may cause damage or disruption to our operations, international commerce, and the global economy, and thus could harm our business. In the eventreimbursement of a major earthquake, hurricane or catastrophic event such as fire, power loss, telecommunications failure, cyber-attack, war, or terrorist attack, pandemic or epidemic, we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure reputational harm, delays in developing our platform and solutions breaches of data security and loss of critical data, all of which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Additionally, we rely on our network and third-party infrastructure and applications, internal technology systems, and our websites for our development, marketing, operational support, hosted services, and marketing activities. If these systems were to fail or be negatively impacted as a result of a natural disaster or other event, our ability to deliver a positive user and merchant experience would be impaired.

As we grow our business, the need for business continuity planning and disaster recovery plans will grow in significance. If we are unable to develop adequate plans to ensure that our business functions continue to operate during and after a disaster, and successfully execute on those planscertain incentive-based compensation in the event of a disaster or emergency,restatement of our business and reputation would be harmed.financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. securities laws.

Director Compensation Table

The table below shows the total compensation that we paid to our non-employee directors who received compensation during 2023:

We may be subject to tax related controversies.

We may also be subject to tax controversies inNon-Employee Director Compensation

The following is a description of the United States and in foreign jurisdictions that can result in tax assessments against us. Developments in an audit, investigation, or other tax controversy can have a material effect onstandard compensation arrangements under which our operating results or cash flows. We regularly assessnon-employee directors are compensated for their service as directors, including as members of the likelihood of an adverse outcome resulting from these proceedings to determine the adequacyvarious committees of our tax accruals and while we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final outcome of audits, investigations, and any other tax controversies could be materially different from our historical tax accruals.Board.

Operating as a public company requires us to incur substantial costs and requires substantial management attention. In addition, our management team has limited experience managing a public company and the requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain additional executive management and qualified board members.Equity Compensation

As a public company, we incur substantial legal, accounting, and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. For example, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC. The rules and regulations of Nasdaq also apply to us. As part of the new requirements, we need to establish and maintain effective disclosure and financial controls and we have made changes to our corporate governance practices. We expect that compliance with these requirements will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources.

Many membersEach of our management and other key personnel have little experience managing a public company and preparing public filings. In addition, as a public company,non-employee directors is compensated with periodic automatic grants of equity, which are granted under our management and other key personnel must divert attention from other business matters to devote substantial time to the reporting and other requirements of being a public company. In particular, we incur significant expense and devote substantial management effort to complying with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We will need to continue to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge.

As a result of disclosure of information in this report and in filings required of a public company, our business and financial condition will become more visible, which may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by stockholders and competitors. If such claims are successful, our business and operating results could be adversely affected, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of our management and adversely affect our business and operating results.

In addition, as a result of our disclosure obligations as a public company, we have reduced flexibility2020 Plan and are under pressure to focus on short-term results, which may adversely affect our ability to achieve long-term profitability.

If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies prove to be incorrect or financial reporting standards or interpretations change, our operating results could be adversely affected.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities, and equity as of the date of the financial statements, and the amount of revenue and expenses, during the periods presented, that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include those related to the fair value of financial instruments, useful lives of long-lived assets, fair value of common stock prior to IPO, fair value of derivative instruments, fair value of redeemable convertible preferred stock and related redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant and equity awards and other equity issuances prior to IPO, incremental borrowing rate applied to lease accounting, contingent liabilities, allowances for refunds and chargebacks and uncertain tax positions. Our operating results may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of industry or financial analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the trading price of our Class A common stock.

If analysts do not publish research about our business or if they publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, our stock price and trading volume could decline.non-discretionary.

The trading market for our Class A common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that analysts publish about our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our Class A common stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our Class A common stock would likely decline. If few analysts cover us, demand for our Class A common stock could decrease and our Class A common stock price and trading volume may decline. Similar results may occur if one or more of these analysts stop covering us in the future or failInitial Equity Award. Each non-employee director appointed to publish reports on us regularly.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

Our corporate headquarters occupies approximately 69,000 square feet in San Francisco, California under leases that expire in 2025. We also lease offices in California and Washington, as well as locations internationally, including in China and the Netherlands.

In February 2022, our Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan. As part of the restructuring, we are evaluating options to decrease our real estate footprint, which include subleasing and/or terminating parts of our facility leases located in San Francisco and San Jose, California and Toronto, Canada. See the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— February 2022 Restructuring Plan” and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12. Subsequent Events, “February 2022 Restructuring Plan,” for further discussion of our restructuring plan.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

The information set forth under the heading “Legal Contingencies and Proceedings” in Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies, in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Price of Our Class A Common Stock

Our Class A common stock has been listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “WISH”. Our Class B common stock is neither listed nor traded.

Holders of Record

As of December 31, 2021, we had 37 holders of record of our Class A common stock and 77 holders of record of our Class B common stock. Because many of our shares of Class A common stock are held in street name by brokers and other nominees on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial owners of our Class A common stock represented by these holders of record.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings and do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws, and will dependgranted RSUs on a number of factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, general business conditions, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

Stock Performance Graph

This performance graph shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of ContextLogic, Inc. under the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act.

The following graph compares the cumulative total return to stockholders on our common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the Nasdaq Composite Total Return Index (XCMP) and the Nasdaq US Benchmark Retail TR Index (NQUBST). An investment of $100 is assumed to have been made in our common stock and in each index on December 17, 2020, the date our Class A common stock began trading on the Nasdaq, and its relative performance is tracked through December 31, 2021. The returns shown are based on historical results and are not intended to suggest future performance.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, which will be filed not later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

Item 6.[Reserved]

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements that involve expectations, plans or intentions (such as those relating to future business, future results of operations or financial condition, new or planned features or services, management strategies or timing and other expectations regarding our business). You can identify these forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” and other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, those discussed in “Item 1A: Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in our consolidated financial statements, related notes, and the other information appearing elsewhere in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any of our forward-looking statements after the date of this reporthis or her appointment to reflect actual results or future events or circumstances. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. You should read the following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in conjunction with the special note regarding forward-looking statements, consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this report. A discussion regarding our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 is included under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Financial Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2021

As of December 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of $2.5 billion. We expect losses from operations to continue for the foreseeable future as we incur costs and expenses related to brand development, expansion of market share, and continued development of our mobile shopping marketplace infrastructure.

In 2021, we faced the headwinds of reduced retention and new buyer conversion and a rise in digital advertising costs. In response to rising digital advertising costs, which contributed to lower marketing efficiency, starting in the third quarter of 2021, we decided to significantly reduce our digital advertising expenditures as we focused our resources on other strategic initiatives. As discussed below under “Key Financial and Performance Metrics,” our monthly active users (“MAUs”) and last twelve months (“LTM”) active buyers were negatively impacted by our decision to significantly reduce our digital advertising expenditures. Starting in the third quarter of 2021, in response to these headwinds, we commenced a number of initiatives that we believe will improve the user experience and increase retention, including (i) enhancing our product quality and selection, (ii) providing an unmatched fun and entertaining shopping experience, and (iii) improving the performance of the app.  We believe our continued strategy to enhance users’ experience in our marketplace and provide a more differentiated and engaging user experience will position us for long-term sustainable growth.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

As of the date of filing of this Annual Report, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”), including recent and any future variants, has affected businesses worldwide, and continues to impact the major markets in which we operate. Our business, operations and financial condition and results have been and may continue to be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and a range of external factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic that are not within our control. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant governmental measures being implemented at various times and in various geographic areas over the course of the pandemic to control the spread of the virus. Our operations as well as the operations of our third-party merchants have been, and we expect will continue to be, disrupted by varying individual and governmental responses to COVID-19 around the world.

In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has also disrupted the global supply chain, which may interfere with the delivery of our merchants’ products to our users. Our MAUs, LTM Active Buyers and revenue may be negatively impacted due to a combination of reasons including: (i) macroeconomic factors such as worldwide retail businesses reopening; (ii) the disruption of the global supply chain; (iii) increased consumer spending on travel and other discretionary items; and, (iv) the waning impact of U.S. and other government economic stimulus programs.

February 2022 Restructuring Plan

In February 2022, our Board of Directors approved the February 2022 Restructuring Plan (“Restructuring Plan”) to refocus our operations to support sustainable long-term growth, better align resources, and improve operational efficiencies. We expect the Restructuring Plan to be substantially implemented by the end of fiscal year 2022.

The Restructuring Plan includes i) reducing our headcount by approximately 15% (or approximately 190 positions), ii) exiting various facility leases, and iii) reducing and realigning vendor expenditures. In connection with the Restructuring Plan, we estimate that we will incur one-time charges of $3 million for employee severance and other personnel reduction costs and a maximum of $21 million consisting of costs to exit certain facility leases and related noncash impairments of lease assets and property and equipment. We anticipate that related severance payments will occur by the end of the second quarter of 2022. We expect to achievehaving an approximate range of $32 to $37 million in annualized cost savings as a result of the Restructuring Plan.

Initial Public Offering

In December 2020, we completed our IPO of Class A common stock, in which we sold 46 million shares. The shares were sold at an IPO price of $24.00 per share for net proceeds of $1.1 billion, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately $52 million. We incurred offering costs, net of reimbursements, of approximately $6 million.

Our Financial Model

Our business benefits from powerful network effects, fueled by our data advantage and massive scale. As more users join Wish, attracted by our affordable value proposition and personalized shopping experiences, we are able to increase revenue potential for our merchants. The successes of our merchants attract more merchants and broaden the product selection on Wish’s platform, which further improves user experiences. The growth in users and merchants generates more data, which, in turn, refines our algorithm and strengthens our data advantage. By focusing on users and merchants, we align their success with our own.    

The economics of the Wish platform rely on cost-effectively adding new users, converting those users into buyers, and improving engagement and monetization of those buyers over time as well as acquiring new merchants and monetizing the end-to-end services that we provide to them. 

Key Financial and Performance Metrics

In addition to the measures presented in our consolidated financial statements, we monitor the following key metrics and other financial information to measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, and make strategic decisions.

Monthly Active Users

We define MAUs as the number of unique users that visited the Wish platform, either on our mobile app, mobile web, or on a desktop, during the month. MAUs for a given reporting period equal the average of the MAUs for that period. An active user is identified by a unique email-address; a single person can have multiple user accounts via multiple email addresses. The change in MAUs in a reported period captures both the inflow of new users as well as the outflow of existing users who did not visit the platform in a given month. We view the number of MAUs as key driver of revenue growth as well as a key indicator of user engagement and brand awareness.

MAUs decreased approximately 31% from the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. We believe this decline was primarily driven by our decision to significantly reduce our digital advertising expenditures.

LTM Active Buyers

As of the last date of each reported period, we determine our number of unique LTM active buyers by counting the total number of individual users who have placed at least one order on the Wish platform, either on our mobile app, mobile web, or on a desktop, during the preceding 12 months. We, however, exclude from the computation those buyers whose order is canceled before the item is shipped and the purchase price is refunded. The number of Active Buyers is an indicator of our ability to attract and monetize a large user base to our platform and of our ability to convert visits into purchases. We believe that increasing our Active Buyers will be a significant driver to our future revenue growth.

LTM Active Buyers decreased approximately 31% from the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2020. We believe this decline was primarily driven by reduced digital advertising expenditures resulting in lower MAUs and conversion.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin

We provide Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure that represents our net income (loss) before interest and other income (expense), net (which includes foreign exchange gain or loss and gain or loss on one-time transactions recognized), income tax expense, and depreciation and amortization, adjusted to eliminate stock-based compensation expense, lease termination and impairment related expenses, and remeasurement of redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability, and to add back certain recurring other items. Additionally, we provide Adjusted EBITDA Margin, a non-GAAP financial measure that represents Adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue. Below is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

We have included Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin in this report because they are key measures used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance and trends and how we are allocating internal resources, to prepare and approve our annual budget and to develop short- and long-term operating plans. We also believe that the exclusion of certain items in calculating Adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business as it removes the impact of non-cash items and certain variable charges.

Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical measure, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

Because of these limitations, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin alongside other financial performance measures, including various cash flow metrics, net income (loss) and our other GAAP results.

The following table reflects the reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA and net loss as a percentage of revenue to Adjusted EBITDA margin for each of the periods indicated: