UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
| |
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182019 |
|
| |
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 000-55434
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
| Maryland | | 46-1749436 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300
Irvine, California | | 92612 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 270-9200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | | | |
| Title of each class | | Trading Symbol(s) | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| None | | None | | None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes x No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨ Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | |
| Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
| Non-accelerated filer | x | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
| | | Emerging growth company | ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
There is no established market for the registrant’s common stock. On October 3, 2018,2019, the registrant’s board of directors established the most recentan updated estimated per share net asset value of the registrant’s common stock of $9.37$9.40 as of June 30, 2018.2019. As of June 30, 2018, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, there were approximately 198,005,088193,850,404 shares of common stock held by non-affiliates, excluding shares owned by officers of American Healthcare Investors, LLC, the affiliated co-sponsor of the registrant’s offering of securities, for an aggregate market value of $1,855,308,000,$1,822,194,000, assuming a market value as of that date of $9.37$9.40 per share.
As of March 15, 2019,20, 2020, there were 199,067,475195,365,495 shares of common stock of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. outstanding.
______________________________________
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant incorporates by reference portions of the Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. definitive proxy statement for the 20192020 annual meeting of stockholders (into Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III).
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business.
The use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, except where the context otherwise requires.noted.
Company
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was incorporated on January 11, 2013 and therefore, we consider that our date of inception. We were initially capitalized on January 15, 2013. We invest in a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. We also operate healthcare-related facilities utilizing the structure permitted by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007, which is commonly referred to as a “RIDEA” structure (the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, authorizing the RIDEA structure were enacted as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008). We also originate and acquire secured loans and may also originate and acquire other real estate-related investments on an infrequent and opportunistic basis. We generally seek investments that produce current income. We qualified to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Code for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014, and we intend to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.
On February 26, 2014, we commenced a best efforts initial public offering, or our initial offering, in which we offered to the public up to $1,900,000,000 in shares of our common stock. As of April 22, 2015, the deregistration date of our initial offering, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our initial offering for 184,930,598 shares of our common stock, or $1,842,618,000, excluding shares of our common stock issued pursuant to our initial distribution reinvestment plan, or the Initial DRIP. As of April 22, 2015, a total of $18,511,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 1,948,563 shares of our common stock being issued pursuant to the Initial DRIP.
On March 25, 2015, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, to register a maximum of $250,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the Initial DRIP, or the 2015 DRIP Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering following the deregistration of our initial offering on April 22, 2015.offering. Effective October 5, 2016, we amended and restated the Initial DRIP, or the Amended and Restated DRIP, to amend the price at which shares of our common stock are issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering. We intend to continuecontinued to offer shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering until the termination and deregistration of such offering. See Note 13, Equity — Distribution Reinvestment Plan,offering on March 29, 2019. As of March 29, 2019, a total of $245,396,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 26,386,545 shares of common stock being issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering.
On January 30, 2019, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to register a maximum of $200,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the Amended and Note 23, Subsequent Events —Restated DRIP, or the 2019 DRIP Offering,Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a discussion of the 2019 DRIP Offering (as defined below), which will commence immediatelyon April 1, 2019, following the terminationderegistration of the 2015 DRIP Offering. As of December 31, 2019, a total of $41,244,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 4,398,586 shares of common stock being issued pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering. We collectively refer to the Initial DRIP portion of our initial offering, the 2015 DRIP Offering and the 20152019 DRIP Offering as our DRIP Offerings. As of December 31, 2018, a total of $231,200,000 in distributions were reinvested and 24,871,447 shares of our common stock were issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering.
On October 3, 2018,2019, our board of directors, or our board, at the recommendation of the audit committee of our board, comprised solely of independent directors, unanimously approved and established the most recentan updated estimated per share net asset value, or NAV, of our common stock of $9.37.$9.40. We provide an updated estimated per share NAV on at least an annual basis to assist broker-dealers in connection with their obligations under National Association of Securities Dealers Conduct Rule 2340, as required by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, Rule 2231 with respect to customer account statements. The most recentupdated estimated per share NAV is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of June 30, 2018.2019. The valuation was performed in accordance with the methodology provided in Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs, issued by the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives, or the IPA, in April 2013, in addition to guidance from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. We intend to continue to publish an updated estimated per share NAV on at least an annual basis. See our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 4, 2018,2019, for more information on the methodologies and assumptions used to determine, and the limitations and risks of, our most recentupdated estimated per share NAV.
We conduct substantially all of our operations through Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, or our operating partnership. We are externally advised by Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Advisor, or our advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement, or the Advisory Agreement, between us and our advisor. The Advisory Agreement was effective as of February 26, 2014 and had a one-year initial term, subject to successive one-year renewals upon the mutual consent of the parties. The Advisory Agreement was last renewed pursuant to the mutual consent of
the parties on February 13, 201911, 2020 and expires on February 26, 2020.2021. Our advisor uses its best efforts, subject to the oversight, review and approval of our board, to, among other things, research, identify, review and make investments in and dispositions of properties
and securities on our behalf consistent with our investment policies and objectives. Our advisor performs its duties and responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement as our fiduciary. Our advisor is 75.0% owned and managed by wholly owned subsidiaries of American Healthcare Investors, LLC, or American Healthcare Investors, and 25.0% owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of Griffin Capital Company, LLC, or Griffin Capital, or collectively, our co-sponsors. American Healthcare Investors is 47.1% owned by AHI Group Holdings, LLC, or AHI Group Holdings, 45.1% indirectly owned by Colony Capital, Inc. (NYSE: CLNY), or Colony Capital, and 7.8% owned by James F. Flaherty III, a former partner of Colony Capital. We are not affiliated with Griffin Capital, Griffin Capital Securities, LLC, the dealer manager for our initial offering, or our dealer manager, Colony Capital or Mr. Flaherty; however, we are affiliated with Griffin-American Advisor, American Healthcare Investors and AHI Group Holdings.
Key Developments during 2018
On September 5, 2019, we entered into an amended and restated loan agreement, or the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, with KeyBank, National Association, CIT Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., Regions Capital Markets, Bank of America, N.A., The Huntington National Bank and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders named therein, to obtain a senior secured revolving credit facility with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $360,000,000, consisting of: (i) a $325,000,000 secured revolver supported by real estate assets and ancillary business cash flow and (ii) a $35,000,000 accounts receivable revolving credit facility supported by eligible accounts receivable, or the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility. See Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans — 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.
On October 3, 2018,2019, our board, at the recommendation of the audit committee of our board, comprised solely of independent directors, unanimously approved and established the most recentan updated estimated per share NAV of our common stock of $9.37,$9.40, an increase from the previous estimated per share NAV of $9.27$9.37 approved by our board on October 4, 2017.3, 2018.
During 2018,2019, we expanded our integrated senior health campuses segment by $59,591,000$45,472,000 through the completion of development projects, as well as the acquisition of additional campuses and land parcels for development through our majority-owned subsidiary, Trilogy Investors, LLC.
On December 20, 2018, we entered into a Commitment Increase Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., or Bank of America, as administrative agent and the increasing lender, to increase the aggregate maximum principal amount of our revolving line of credit, or the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit, from $550,000,000 to $575,000,000. See Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.
On January 25, 2019, we terminated the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit as described above and also entered into a credit agreement, or the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement, with Bank of America, KeyBank, National Association, Citizens Bank, National Association, and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, to obtain a revolving line of credit with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $150,000,000, or the 2019 Corporate Revolving Credit Facility, and a term loan credit facility in the amount of $480,000,000, or the 2019 Corporate Term Loan Facility, and together with the 2019 Corporate Revolving Credit Facility, the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit. See Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, and Note 23, Subsequent Events — 2019 Corporate Line of Credit, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.
On January 30, 2019, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to register a maximum of $200,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the Amended and Restated DRIP, or the 2019 DRIP Offering. The Registration Statement on Form S-3 was automatically effective with the SEC upon its filing; however, we will not commence offering shares pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering until the termination of the 2015 DRIP Offering.
As of March 21, 2019,20, 2020, we owned and/or operated 9798 properties, comprising 101102 buildings, and 113118 integrated senior health campuses including completed development projects, or approximately 13,332,00013,836,000 square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, for an aggregate contract purchase price of $2,955,984,000.$3,003,155,000. In addition, as of March 21, 2019,20, 2020, we have invested $89,079,000 inalso owned a real estate-related investments, net of principal repayments.investment purchased for $60,429,000.
Our Structure
The following is a summary of our organizational structure as of March 21, 2019:26, 2020:
Our principal executive offices are located at 18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300, Irvine, California 92612, and our telephone number is (949) 270-9200. We maintain a web site at http://www.healthcarereit3.com, at which there is additional information about us and our affiliates. The contents of that site are not incorporated by reference in, or otherwise a part of, this filing. We make our periodic and current reports and all amendments to those reports available at http://www.healthcarereit3.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with the SEC. They also are available for printing
by any stockholder upon request. In addition, copies of our filings with the SEC may be obtained from the SEC’s website, http://www.sec.gov. Access to these filings is free of charge.
Investment Objectives
Our investment objectives are:
to preserve, protect and return our stockholders’ capital contributions;
to pay regular cash distributions; and
to realize growth in the value of our investments upon our ultimate sale of such investments.
We may not attain these objectives. Our board may change our investment objectives if it determines it is advisable and in the best interest of our stockholders.
During the term of the Advisory Agreement, decisions relating to the purchase or sale of investments will be made by our advisor, subject to approval by our advisor’s investment committee and oversight and approval by our board.
Investment Strategy
We have and we may continue to invest in a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities, such as long-term acute care centers, surgery centers, memory care facilities, specialty medical and diagnostic service facilities, laboratories and research facilities, pharmaceutical and medical supply manufacturing facilities and offices leased to tenants in healthcare-related industries. We generally seek investments that produce current income. We have acquired properties either alone or jointly with another party and may continue to acquire properties either alone or jointly with another party. We also have originated and acquired and may continue to originate or acquire, secured loans and other real estate-related investments on an infrequent and opportunistic basis. We also may originate or acquire real estate-related investments such as mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans, common and preferred stock of, or other interests in, public or private unaffiliated real estate companies, commercial mortgage-backed securities and certain other securities, including collateralized debt obligations and foreign securities. We have acquired properties and may continue to acquire properties either directly or jointly with third parties. We generally seek investments that produce current income.
We seek to maximize long-term stockholder value by generating sustainable growth in cash flows and portfolio value. In order to achieve these objectives, we may invest using a number of investment structures, which may include direct acquisitions, joint ventures, leveraged investments, issuing securities for property and direct and indirect investments in real estate. In order to maintain our exemption from regulation as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the Investment Company Act, we may be required to limit our investments in certain types of real estate-related investments. See “Investment Company Act Considerations” below for a further discussion.
In addition, when and as determined appropriate by our advisor, our portfolio may also include properties in various stages of development other than those producing current income. These stages include, without limitation, unimproved land both with and without entitlements and permits, property to be redeveloped and repositioned, newly constructed properties and properties in lease-up or other stabilization, all of which have limited or no relevant operating histories and current income. Our advisor makes this determination based upon a variety of factors, including the available risk-adjusted returns for such properties when compared with other available properties, the appropriate diversification of the portfolio and our objectives of realizing both current income and capital appreciation upon the ultimate sale of properties.
For each of our investments, regardless of property type, we seek to invest in properties with the following attributes:
Quality. We seek to acquire properties that are suitable for their intended use with a quality of construction that is capable of sustaining the property’s investment potential for the long-term, assuming funding of budgeted maintenance, repairs and capital improvements.
Location. We seek to acquire properties that are located in established or otherwise appropriate markets for comparable properties, with access and visibility suitable to meet the needs of its occupants. In addition to United States properties, we also seek to acquire international properties that meet our investment criteria.
Market; Supply and Demand. We focus on local or regional markets that have potential for stable and growing property level cash flows over the long-term. These determinations are based in part on an evaluation of local and regional economic, demographic and regulatory factors affecting the property. For instance, we favor markets that indicate a growing population and employment base or markets that exhibit potential limitations on additions to supply, such as barriers to new construction. Barriers to new construction include lack of available land and stringent zoning restrictions. In addition, we generally seek to limit our investments in areas that have limited potential for growth.
Predictable Capital Needs. We seek to acquire properties where the future expected capital needs can be reasonably projected in a manner that would enable us to meet our objectives of growth in cash flows and preservation of capital and stability.
Cash Flows. We seek to acquire properties where the current and projected cash flows, including the potential for appreciation in value, would enable us to meet our overall investment objectives. We evaluate cash flows as well as expected growth and the potential for appreciation.
We have not invested more than 10.0% of the proceeds available for investment from our initial offering in unimproved or non-income producing properties or in other investments relating to unimproved or non-income producing property. A property is considered unimproved or currently non-income producing property for purposes of this limitation if it: (i) is not acquired for the purpose of currently producing rental or other operating income; or (ii) has no development or construction in process at the date of acquisition or planned in good faith to commence within one year of the date of acquisition.
We have not invested more than 10.0% of the proceeds available for investment from our initial offering in commercial mortgage-backed securities. In addition, we have not invested more than 10.0% of the proceeds available for investment from our initial offering in equity securities of public or private real estate companies.
We are not limited as to the geographic areas where we may acquire properties and may acquire properties domestically as well as internationally.properties. We are not specifically limited in the number or size of properties we may acquire or on the percentage of our assets that we may invest in a single property or investment, and we have not invested more than 25.0% of the proceeds available for investment from our initial offering in international properties. The number and mix of properties and real estate-related investments we will acquire will depend upon real estate and market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time we are acquiring our properties and making our investments and the amount of debt financing available.
Real Estate Investments
We have invested, and willmay continue to invest, in a diversified portfolio of real estate investments, focusing primarily on medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. We generally seek investments that produce current income. Our investments may include:
medical office buildings;
hospitals;
skilled nursing facilities;
senior housing facilities;
healthcare-related facilities operated utilizing a RIDEA structure;
long-term acute care facilities;
surgery centers;
memory care facilities;
specialty medical and diagnostic service facilities;
laboratories and research facilities;
pharmaceutical and medical supply manufacturing facilities; and
offices leased to tenants in healthcare-related industries.
Our advisor generally seeks to acquire real estate on our behalf of the types described above that will best enable us to meet our investment objectives, taking into account the diversification of our portfolio at the time, relevant real estate and financial factors, the location, the income-producing capacity and the prospects for long-range appreciation of a particular property and other considerations. As a result, we may acquire properties other than the types described above. In addition, we may acquire properties that vary from the parameters described above for a particular property type.
The consideration for each real estate investment must be authorized by a majority of our independent directors or a duly authorized committee of our board and ordinarily is based on the fair market value of the investment. If the majority of our independent directors or a duly authorized committee of our board so determines, or if the investment is to be acquired from an affiliate, the fair market value determination must be supported by an appraisal obtained from a qualified independent appraiser selected by a majority of our independent directors.
Our real estate investments generally take the form of holding fee title or long-term leasehold interests. Our investments may be made either directly through our operating partnership or indirectly through investments in joint ventures, limited liability companies, general partnerships or other co-ownership arrangements with the developers of the properties, affiliates of our advisor or other persons. See “Joint Ventures” below for a further discussion.
In addition, we have and may continue to participateparticipated in sale-leaseback transactions, in which we purchase real estate investments and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. Our advisor will use its best efforts to structure any such sale-leaseback transaction such that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease” and so that we will be treated as the owner of the property for federal income tax purposes.
Our obligation to close a transaction involving the purchase of real estate is generally conditioned upon the delivery and verification of certain documents from the seller or developer, including, where appropriate:
plans and specifications;
environmental reports (generally a minimum of a Phase I investigation);
building condition reports;
surveys;
evidence of marketable title subject to such liens and encumbrances as are acceptable to our advisor;
audited financial statements covering recent operations of real properties having operating histories unless such statements are not required to be filed with the SEC and delivered to stockholders;
title insurance policies; and
liability insurance policies.
In determining whether to purchase a particular real estate investment, we may, in circumstances in which our advisor deems it appropriate, obtain an option on such property, including land suitable for development. The amount paid for an option is normally surrendered if the real estate is not purchased, and is normally credited against the purchase price if the real estate is purchased. We also may enter into arrangements with the seller or developer of a real estate investment whereby the seller or developer agrees that if, during a stated period, the real estate investment does not generate specified cash flows, the seller or developer will pay us cash in an amount necessary to reach the specified cash flows level, subject in some cases to negotiated dollar limitations.
We will not purchase or lease real estate in which one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, any of our directors or any of their affiliates have an interest without a determination by a majority of our disinterested directors and a majority of our disinterested independent directors that such transaction is fair and reasonable to us and at a price to us no greater than the cost of the real estate investment to the affiliated seller or lessor, unless there is substantial justification for the excess amount and the excess amount is reasonable. In no event will we acquire any such real estate investment at an amount in excess of its current appraised value.
We have obtained, and we intend to continue to obtain, adequate insurance coverage for all real estate investments in which we invest.
We have acquired, and we intend to continue to acquire, leased properties with long-term leases and we generally do not intend to operate any healthcare-related facilities directly. As a REIT, we are prohibited from operating healthcare-related facilities directly; however, from time to time we have leased and may continue to lease a healthcare-related facility that we acquire to a wholly-ownedwholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS. In such an event, our TRS will engage a third party in the business of operating healthcare-related facilities to manage the property utilizing a RIDEA structure.
Joint Ventures
We have entered into, and we may continue to enter into, joint ventures, general partnerships and other arrangements with one or more institutions or individuals, including real estate developers, operators, owners, investors and others, some of whom may be affiliates of our advisor, for the purpose of acquiring real estate. Such joint ventures may be leveraged with debt financing or unleveraged. We have entered into and may continue to enter into joint ventures to further diversify our investments or to access investments which meet our investment criteria that would otherwise be unavailable to us. In determining whether to invest in a particular joint venture, our advisor will evaluate the real estate that such joint venture owns or is being formed to own under the same criteria useddescribed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the selection of our other properties. However, we will not participate in tenant in common syndications or transactions.
Joint ventures with unaffiliated third parties may be structured such that the investment made by us and the co-venturer are on substantially different terms and conditions. For example, while we and a co-venturer may invest an equal amount of capital in an investment, the investment may be structured such that we have a right to priority distributions of cash flows up to a certain target return while the co-venturer may receive a disproportionately greater share of cash flows than we are to receive once such target return has been achieved. This type of investment structure may result in the co-venturer receiving more of the
cash flows, including appreciation, of an investment than we would receive. See Item 1A, Risk Factors — Risks Related to Joint Ventures, for a further discussion.
We may invest in general partnerships or joint ventures with other Griffin Capital programs or American Healthcare Investors-sponsored programs or affiliates of our advisor to enable us to increase our equity participation in such ventures, so that ultimately we own a larger equity percentage of the property. Our entering into joint ventures with our advisor or any of its affiliates willmay result in certain conflicts of interest. See Item 1A, Risk Factors — Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest — If weWe have entered and may continue to enter into joint ventures with other programs sponsored or advised by one of our co-sponsors or one of their affiliates, and we may face conflicts of interest or disagreements with our joint venture partners that may not be resolved as quickly or on terms as advantageous to us as would be the case if the joint venture had been negotiated at arm’s-length with an independent joint venture partner, for a further discussion.
We may only enter into joint ventures with other Griffin Capital programs or American Healthcare Investors-sponsored programs, affiliates of our advisor or any of our directors for the acquisition of properties if:
a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in such transaction, approves the transaction as being fair and reasonable to us; and
the investment by us and such affiliates are on substantially the same terms and conditions.
Real Estate-Related Investments
In addition to our acquisition of medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities, on an infrequent and opportunistic basis, we have invested, and may continue to invest, in real estate-related investments, including loans (mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans) and securities investments (common and preferred stock of or other interests in public or private unaffiliated real estate companies, commercial mortgage-backed securities and certain other securities, including collateralized debt obligations and foreign securities).
Investing In and Originating Loans
Our criteria for making or investing in loans are substantially the same as those involved in our investment in properties. We do not intend to make loans to other persons, to underwrite securities of other issuers or to engage in the purchase and sale of any types of investments other than those relating to real estate. We will not make or invest in mortgage loans on any one property if the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loan, would exceed an amount equal to 85.0% of the appraised value of the property, as determined by an independent third-party appraiser, unless we find substantial justification due to other underwriting criteria; however, our policy generally will be that the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including our loan, would not exceed 75.0% of the appraised value of the property. We may find such justification in connection with the purchase of loans in cases in which we believe there is a high probability of our foreclosure upon the property in order to acquire the underlying assets and in which the cost of the loan investment does not exceed the fair market value of the underlying property. We will not invest in or make loans unless an appraisal has been obtained concerning the underlying property, except for those loans insured or guaranteed by a government or government agency. In cases in which a majority of our independent directors so determine and in the event the transaction is with our advisor, any of our directors or their respective affiliates, the appraisal will be obtained from a certified independent appraiser to support its determination of fair market value.
We have invested, and we may continue to invest, in first second and thirdsecond mortgage loans, mezzanine loans and bridge loans, wraparound mortgage loans, construction mortgage loans on real property and loans on leasehold interest mortgages.loans. However, we will not make or invest in any loans that are subordinate to any mortgage or equity interest of our advisor, any of our directors, one of our co-sponsors, or any of our affiliates. We also may invest in participations in mortgage loans. Second mortgage loans are secured by second deeds of trust on real property that is already subject to prior mortgage indebtedness. A mezzanine loan is a loan made in respect of certain real property but is secured by a lien on the ownership interests of the entity that, directly or indirectly, owns the real property. A bridge loan is short term financing, for an individual or business, until permanent or the next stage of financing can be obtained. Second mortgage and wraparound loans are secured by second or wraparound deeds of trust on real property that is already subject to prior mortgage indebtedness. A wraparound loan is one or more junior mortgage loans having a principal amount equal to the outstanding balance under the existing mortgage loan, plus the amount actually to be advanced under the wraparound mortgage loan. Under a wraparound loan, we would generally make principal and interest payments on behalf of the borrower to the holders of the prior mortgage loans. Third mortgage loans are secured by third deeds of trust on real property that is already subject to prior first and second mortgage indebtedness. Construction loans are loans made for either original development or renovation of property. Construction loans in which we would generally consider an investment would be secured by first deeds of trust on real property for terms generally ranging
from six months to two years. Loans on leasehold interests are secured by an assignment of the borrower’s leasehold interest in the particular real property. These loans are generally for terms of from six months to 15 years. The leasehold interest loans are either amortized over a period that is shorter than the lease term or have a maturity date prior to the date the lease terminates. These loans would generally permit us to cure any default under the lease. Mortgage participation investments are investments in partial interests of mortgages of the type described above that are made and administered by third-party mortgage lenders.
In evaluating prospective loan investments, our advisor considers factors such as the following:
the ratio of the investment amount to the underlying property’s value;
the property’s potential for capital appreciation;
expected levels of rental and occupancy rates;
the condition and use of the property;
current and projected cash flows of the property;
potential for rent increases;
the degree of liquidity of the investment;
the property’s income-producing capacity;
the quality, experience and creditworthiness of the borrower;
general economic conditions in the area where the property is located;
in the case of mezzanine loans, the ability to acquire the underlying real property; and
other factors that our advisor believes are relevant.
In addition, we will seek to obtain a customary lender’s title insurance policy or commitment as to the priority of the mortgage or condition of the title. Because the factors considered, including the specific weight we place on each factor, will vary for each prospective loan investment, we do not, and are not able to, assign a specific weight or level of importance to any particular factor.
We may originate loans from mortgage brokers or personal solicitations of suitable borrowers, or may purchase existing loans that were originated by other lenders. We may purchase existing loans from affiliates, and we may make or invest in loans in which the borrower is an affiliate. Our advisor will evaluate all potential loan investments to determine if the security for the loan and the loan-to-value ratio meets our investment criteria and objectives. Most loans that we will consider for investment would provide for monthly payments of interest and some may also provide for principal amortization, although many loans of the nature that we will consider provide for payments of interest only and a payment of principal in full at the end of the loan term. We will not originate loans with negative amortization provisions.
We are not limited as to the amount of our assets that may be invested in construction loans, mezzanine loans, bridge loans loans secured by leasehold interests and second third and wraparound mortgage loans. However, we recognize that these types of loans are riskier than first deeds of trust or first priority mortgages on income-producing, fee-simple properties, and we expect to minimize the amount of these types of loans in our portfolio. Our advisor will evaluate the fact that these types of loans are riskier in determining the rate of interest on the loans. We do not have any policy that limits the amount that we may invest in any single loan or the amount we may invest in loans to any one borrower. We have not established a portfolio turnover policy with respect to loans we invest in or originate.
Our loan investments may be subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities and subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing various requirements and restrictions, including among other things, regulating credit granting activities, establishing maximum interest rates and finance charges, requiring disclosures to customers, governing secured transactions and setting collection, repossession and claims handling procedures and other trade practices. In addition, certain states have enacted legislation requiring the licensing of mortgage bankers or other lenders and these requirements may affect our ability to effectuate our proposed investments in loans. Commencement of operations in these or other jurisdictions may be dependent upon a finding of our financial responsibility, character and fitness. We may determine not to make loans in any jurisdiction in which the regulatory authority determines that we have not complied in all material respects with applicable requirements.
Investing in Securities
We have invested, and may continue to invest, in the following types of securities: (i) equity securities such as common stocks, preferred stocks and convertible preferred securities of public or private unaffiliated real estate companies (including other REITs, real estate operating companies and other real estate companies); (ii) debt securities such as commercial
mortgage-backed securities and debt securities issued by other unaffiliated real estate companies; and (iii) certain other types of securities that may help us reach our diversification and other investment objectives. These other securities may include, but are not limited to, various types of collateralized debt obligations and certain non-United States dollar denominated securities.
Our advisor has substantial discretion with respect to the selection of specific securities investments. Our charter provides that we may not invest in equity securities unless a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, approve such investment as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable. Consistent with such requirements, in determining the types of securities investments to make, our advisor will adhere to a board-approved asset allocation framework consisting primarily of components such as: (i) target mix of securities across a range of risk/reward characteristics; (ii) exposure limits to individual securities; and (iii) exposure limits to securities subclasses (such as common equities, debt securities and foreign securities). Within this framework, our advisor will evaluate specific criteria for each prospective securities investment, including:including but not limited to:
positioning the overall portfolio to achieve an optimal mix of real estate and real estate-related investments;
diversification benefits relative to the rest of the securities assets within our portfolio;
fundamental securities analysis;
quality and sustainability of underlying property cash flows;
broad assessment of macroeconomic data and regional property level supply and demand dynamics;
potential for delivering high current income and attractive risk-adjusted total returns; and
additional factors considered important to meeting our investment objectives.
Commercial mortgage-backed securities are securities that evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Commercial mortgage-backed securities generally are pass-through certificates that represent beneficial ownership interests in common law trusts whose assets consist of defined portfolios of one or more commercial mortgage loans. They typically are issued in multiple tranches whereby the more senior classes are entitled to priority distributions from the trust’s income. Losses and other shortfalls from expected amounts to be received in the mortgage pool are borne by the most subordinate classes, which receive payments only after the more senior classes have received all principal and/or interest to which they are entitled. Commercial mortgage-backed securities are subject to all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans. We may invest in investment grade and non-investment grade commercial mortgage-backed securities. However, we have not invested more than 10.0% of the initial offering proceeds available for investment in commercial mortgage-backed securities.
We have not invested more than 10.0% of the proceeds available for investment from our initial offering in equity securities of public or private real estate companies. The specific number and mix of securities in which we invest will depend upon real estate market conditions, other circumstances existing at the time we are investing in our securities, the amount of any future indebtedness that we may incur and any possible future equity offerings. We will not invest in securities of other issuers for the purpose of exercising control and the first or second mortgages in which we intend to invest will likely not be insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs or otherwise guaranteed or insured. Real estate-related equity securities are generally unsecured and also may be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. Our investments in real estate-related equity securities will involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the equity securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer.
Our Strategies and Policies With Respect to Borrowing
We have used, and intend to continue to use, secured and unsecured debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of properties and real estate-related investments. Our ability to enhance our investment returns and to increase our diversification by acquiring assets using additional funds provided through borrowing could be adversely impacted if banks and other lending institutions reduce the amount of funds available for the types of loans we seek. When interest rates are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, we may purchase certain assets for cash with the intention of obtaining debt financing at a later time. We have also used, and may continue to use, derivative financial instruments such as fixed interest rate swaps and caps to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements.
We anticipate that our overall leverage will not exceed 45.0% of the combined market value of all of our properties and other real estate-related investments, as determined at the end of each calendar year. For these purposes, the market value of each asset will be equal to the contract purchase price paid for the asset or, if the asset was appraised subsequent to the date of purchase, then the market value will be equal to the value reported in the most recent independent appraisal of the asset. Our policies do not limit the amount we may borrow with respect to any individual investment. As of December 31, 2018,2019, our aggregate borrowings were 42.1%44.5% of the combined market value of all of our real estate and real estate-related investments.
Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of our net assets without the approval of a majority of our independent directors. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate-related investments before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional real estate or for working capital. We may also borrow funds to satisfy the REIT tax qualification requirement that we distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders. Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As of March 21, 201926, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, our leverage did not exceed 300% of the value of our net assets.
By operating on a leveraged basis, we have more funds available for our investments. This generally enables us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, potentially resulting in enhanced investment returns and a more diversified portfolio.
Our advisor uses its best efforts to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available to us and refinances assets during the term of a loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing loan, when an existing loan matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the
refinancing can be used to purchase such investment. The benefits of the refinancing may include increased cash flows resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing, and an increase in diversification and assets owned if all or a portion of the refinancing proceeds are reinvested.
Our charter restricts us from borrowing money from one of our co-sponsors, our advisor, any of our directors or any of their respective affiliates unless such loan is approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties.
When incurring secured debt, we may incur recourse indebtedness, which means that the lenders’ rights upon our default generally will not be limited to foreclosure on the property that secured the obligation. If we incur mortgage indebtedness, we will endeavor to obtain level payment financing, meaning that the amount of debt service payable would be substantially the same each year, although some mortgages are likely to provide for one large payment and we may incur floating or adjustable rate financing when our board determines it to be in our best interest.
Our board controls our strategies with respect to borrowing and may change such strategies at any time without stockholder approval, subject to the maximum borrowing limit of 300% of our net assets described above.
Sale or Disposition of Assets
Our advisor and our board determine whether a particular property or real estate-related investment should be sold or otherwise disposed of after consideration of the relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view toward maximizing our investment objectives.
We intend to hold each property or real estate-related investment we acquire for an extended period. However, circumstances might arise which could result in a shortened holding period for certain investments. In general, the holding period for real estate-related investments other than real property is expected to be shorter than the holding period for real property assets. A property or real estate-related investment may be sold before the end of the expected holding period if:
diversification benefits exist associated with disposing of the investment and rebalancing our investment portfolio;
an opportunity arises to pursue a more attractive investment;
in the judgment of our advisor, the value of the investment might decline;
with respect to properties, a major tenant involuntarily liquidates or is in default under its lease;
the investment was acquired as part of a portfolio acquisition and does not meet our general acquisition criteria;
an opportunity exists to enhance overall investment returns by raising capital through sale of the investment; or
in the judgment of our advisor, the sale of the investment is in the best interest of our stockholders.
The determination of whether a particular property or real estate-related investment should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of the relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view toward maximizing our investment objectives. The terms of payment will be affected by custom in the area in which the investment being sold is located and the then-prevailing economic conditions.
Development Strategy
On an opportunistic basis, we have developed and may continue to selectively develop real estate assets when market conditions warrant. In doing so, we may be able to reduce overall purchase costs by developing property versus purchasing a finished property. We retain and will continue to retain independent contractors to perform the actual construction work on tenant improvements, such as installing heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems.
We have engaged and may continue to engage our advisor or its affiliates to provide development-related services for all or some of the properties that we develop or acquire for development or refurbishment. In those cases, we pay our advisor or its affiliates a development fee that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered for similar projects in the geographic market where the services are provided if a majority of our independent directors determines that such development fees are fair and reasonable and on terms and conditions not less favorable than those available from unaffiliated third parties.provided. However, we do not pay a development fee to our advisor or its affiliates if our advisor or its affiliates elect to receive an acquisition fee based on the cost of such development. In the event that our advisor or its affiliates assist with planning and coordinating the construction of any tenant improvements or capital improvements, the respective party may be paid a construction management fee of up to 5.0% of the cost of such improvements.
Terms of Leases
The terms and conditions of any lease we enter into with our tenants may vary substantially from those we describe in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. However, we expect that a majority of our leases will require the tenant to pay or reimburse us for some or all of the operating expenses of the building based on the tenant’s proportionate share of rentable space within the building. Operating expenses typically include, but are not limited to, real estate and other taxes, utilities, insurance and building repairs, and other building operation and management costs. We expect to be responsible for the replacement of specific structural components of a property such as the roof of the building or the parking lot. We expect that many of our leases will have terms of five or more years, some of which may have renewal options.
Board Review of Our Investment Policies and Report of Independent Directors
Our board has established written policies on investments and borrowing. Our board is responsible for monitoring the administrative procedures, investment operations and performance of our company and our advisor to ensure such policies are carried out. Our charter requires that our independent directors review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interest of our stockholders. Each determination and the basis therefore is required to be set forth in the minutes of the applicable meetings of our directors. Implementation of our investment policies also may vary as new investment techniques are developed. Our investment policies may not be altered by our board without the approval of our stockholders.
As required by our charter, our independent directors have reviewed our policies outlined above and determined that they are in the best interests of our stockholders because: (i) they increase the likelihood that we will be able to acquire a diversified portfolio of income-producing properties, thereby reducing risk in our portfolio; (ii) there are sufficient property acquisition opportunities with the attributes that we seek; (iii) our executive officers, directors and affiliates of our advisor have expertise with the type of real estate investments we seek; and (iv) our borrowings will enable us to purchase assets and earn more real estate revenue more quickly,earlier than we would have otherwise been able to, thereby increasing our likelihood of generating income for our stockholders and preserving stockholder capital.
Tax Status
We qualified and elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders.
Distribution Policy
In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, among other things, we are required to distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders. We cannot predict if we will generate sufficient cash flows to continue to pay cash distributions to our stockholders on an ongoing basis or at all. The amount of any cash distributions is determined by our board and depends on the amount of distributable funds, current and projected cash requirements, tax considerations, any limitations imposed by the terms of indebtedness we may incur and other factors. If our investments produce sufficient cash flows, we expect to continue to pay distributions to our stockholders on a monthly basis. Because our cash available for distribution in any year may be less than 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, for the year, we may be required to borrow money, use proceeds from the issuance of securities (in
subsequent offerings, if any) or sell assets to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the distribution requirement. These methods of obtaining funds could affect future distributions by increasing operating costs. We did not establish any limit on the amount of net proceeds from our initial offering, and we have not established any limit on the amount of net proceeds from any future offerings, that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of businessbusiness; or (ii) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences.
To the extent that distributions to our stockholders are paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions are taxable as ordinary income. To the extent that our distributions exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such amounts constitute a return of capital to our stockholders for federal income tax purposes, to the extent of their basis in their stock and thereafter will constitute capital gain. All or aAny portion of distributions to our stockholders have been paid from net offering proceeds and thus, such portion of our distributions constitutes a return of capital to our stockholders.
Monthly distributions are calculated with daily record dates so distribution benefits begin to accrue immediately upon becoming a stockholder. However, our board could, at any time, elect to pay distributions quarterly to reduce administrative costs. Subject to applicable REIT rules, we generally reinvest proceeds from the sale, financing, refinancing or other disposition of our properties through the purchase of additional properties, although we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to do so.
The amount of distributions we pay to our stockholders is determined by our board and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for the payment of distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements, annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code and restrictions imposed by our organizational documents and Maryland Law.
See Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Distributions, for a further discussion of distributions approved by our board.
Competition
We compete with many other entities engaged in real estate investment activities for acquisitions of medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities, including international, national, regional and local operators, acquirers and developers of healthcare and real estate properties. The competition for healthcare real estate properties may significantly increase the price we must pay for medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities or other assets we seek to acquire, and our competitors may succeed in acquiring those properties or assets themselves. In addition, our potential acquisition targets may find our competitors to be more attractive because they may have greater resources, may be willing to pay more for the properties or may have a more compatible operating philosophy. In particular, larger healthcare REITs may enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. Further, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investment properties may increase. This competition will result in increased demand for these assets, and therefore, increased prices paid for them. If there is an increased interest in single-property acquisitions among tax-motivated individual purchasers, we may pay higher prices per property if we purchase single properties in comparison with portfolio acquisitions. If we pay higher prices per property for medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing or other healthcare-related facilities, our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders may be materially and adversely affected and our stockholders may experience a lower return on their investment.
In addition, income from our investments is dependent on the ability of our tenants and operators to compete with other healthcare operators. These operators compete on a local and regional basis for residents and patients and the operators’ ability to successfully attract and retain residents and patients depends on key factors such as the number of facilities in the local market, the types of services available, the quality of care, reputation, age and appearance of each facility and the cost of care in each locality. Private, federal and state payment programs and the effect of other laws and regulations may also have a significant impact on the ability of our tenants and operators to compete successfully for residents and patients at the properties. For additional information on the risks associated with our business, please see Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Government Regulations
Many laws and governmental regulations are applicable to our properties and changes in these laws and regulations, or their interpretation by agencies and the courts, occur frequently.
Costs of Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, or the ADA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements for access and use by disabled persons.
Although we believe that we are in substantial compliance with present requirements of the ADA, none of our properties have been audited, nor have investigations of our properties been conducted to determine compliance. Additional federal, state and local laws also may require modifications to our properties or restrict our ability to renovate our properties. We cannot predict the cost of compliance with the ADA or other legislation. We may incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA or any other legislation.
Costs of Government Environmental Regulation and Private Litigation. Environmental laws and regulations hold us liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances which may be on our properties. These laws could impose liability without regard to whether we are responsible for the presence or release of the hazardous materials. Government investigations and remediation actions may have substantial costs and the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in personal injury or similar claims by private plaintiffs. Various laws also impose liability on a person who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances and such person often must incur the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous substances at the disposal or treatment facility. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. As the owner of our properties, we may be deemed to have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances.
Other Federal, State and Local Regulations. Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these various requirements, we may incur governmental fines or private damage awards. While we believe that our properties are and will be in substantial compliance with all of these regulatory requirements, we do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether
future requirements will require us to make significant unanticipated expenditures that will adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. We believe, based in part on engineering reports which are generally obtained at the time we acquire the properties, that all of our properties comply in all material respects with current regulations. However, if we were required to make significant expenditures under applicable regulations, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to pay distributions could be adversely affected.
Significant Tenants
As of December 31, 2018,2019, none of our tenants at our consolidated properties accounted for 10.0% or more of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized net operating income, or NOI, which is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect inclusive of our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and integrated senior health campuses operations as of December 31, 2018.2019.
Geographic Concentration
For a discussion of our geographic information, see Item 2, Properties — Geographic Diversification/Concentration Table, as well as Note 19, Segment Reporting, and Note 20, Concentration of Credit Risk, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Employees
We have no employees and our executive officers are all employees of affiliatesone of our advisor.co-sponsors. Our day-to-day management is performed by our advisor and its affiliates. We cannot determine at this time if or when we might hire any employees, although we do not anticipate hiring any employees during the next twelve months. We do not directly compensate our executive officers for services rendered to us. However, our executive officers, consultants and the executive officers and key employees of our advisor and its affiliates are eligible for awards pursuant to the 2013 Incentive Plan, or our incentive plan. As of December 31, 2018,2019, no awards had been granted to our executive officers, consultants or the executive officers or key employees of our advisor or its affiliates under this plan.
Investment Company Act Considerations
We conduct and intend to continue to conduct our operations, and the operations of our operating partnership and any other subsidiaries, so that no such entity meets the definition of an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act.
We primarily engage in the business of investing in real estate assets; however, our portfolio does include, to a much lesser extent, other real estate-related investments. We have also acquired and may continue to acquire real estate assets through investments in joint venture entities, including joint venture entities in which we may not own a controlling interest. We anticipate that our assets generally will be held in wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries of the company, each formed to hold a particular asset. We monitor our operations and our assets on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, meet the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. Among other things, we monitor the proportion of our portfolio that is placed in investments in securities.
Financial Information About Industry Segments
Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about a public entity’s reportable segments. We segregate our operations into reporting segments in order to assess the performance of our business in the same way that management reviews our performance and makes operating decisions. Accordingly, when we acquired our first medical office building in June 2014; senior housing facility in September 2014; hospital in December 2014; senior housing — RIDEA portfoliofacility in May 2015; skilled nursing facilitiesfacility in October 2015; and integrated senior health campusescampus in December 2015, we added a new reportable business segment at each such time. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we operated through six reportable business segments — medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEA and integrated senior health campuses.
Medical Office Buildings. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we owned 64 medical office buildings, or MOBs. These properties typically contain physicians’ offices and examination rooms and may also include pharmacies, hospital ancillary service space and outpatient services such as diagnostic centers, rehabilitation clinics and day-surgery operating rooms. While these properties are similar to commercial office buildings, they require additional parking spaces as well as plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate multiple exam rooms that may require sinks in every room and special equipment such as x-ray machines. In addition, MOBs are often built to accommodate higher structural loads for certain equipment and may contain “vaults” or other specialized construction. Our MOBs are typically multi-tenant properties leased to healthcare providers (hospitals and physician practices). for approximately three to 10 years with fixed annual escalations. Based on GLA, approximately 33.3%
33.4% of our MOBs are located on hospital campuses and 3.1% are affiliated with hospital systems. Our medical office buildings segment accounted for approximately 7.1%6.6%, 7.5%7.1% and 7.4%7.5% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Hospitals. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we owned two hospital buildings. Services provided by our operators and tenants in our hospitals are paid for by private sources, third-party payerspayors (e.g., insurance and Health Maintenance Organizations, or HMOs)Organizations), or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs. We expect that our hospital properties typically will include acute care, long-term acute care, specialty and rehabilitation hospitals and generally will be leased to single tenants or operators under triple-net lease structures. Our hospitals segment accounted for approximately 1.1%0.9%, 1.2%1.1% and 1.7%1.2% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, respectively.
Skilled Nursing Facilities. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we owned seven skilled nursing facilities, or SNFs. Skilled nursing facility residents are generally higher acuity and need assistance with eating, bathing, dressing, and/or require assistance with medication and also require available 24-hour nursing care. SNFs offer restorative, rehabilitative and custodial nursing care for people not requiring the more extensive and sophisticated treatment available at hospitals. Ancillary revenues and revenues from sub-acute care services are derived from providing services to residents beyond room and board and include occupational, physical, speech, respiratory and intravenous therapy, wound care, oncology treatment, brain injury care, and orthopedic therapy as well as sales of pharmaceutical products and other services. Certain SNFs provide some of the foregoing services on an out-patient basis. Skilled nursing services provided by our tenants in these SNFs are primarily paid for either by private sources or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Our SNFs are leased to a single tenant under a triple-net lease structure.structure with approximately 12 to 15 year terms and fixed annual rent escalations. Our skilled nursing facilities segment accounted for approximately 1.3%1.1%, 1.4%1.3% and 0.9%1.4% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, respectively.
Senior Housing. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we owned 15nine senior housing facilities. Senior housing facilities cater to different segments of the elderly population based upon their personal needs.needs, and include assisted living, memory care, and independent living. Residents of assisted living facilities typically need assistance with eating, bathing, dressing, and/or medications and those services can be provided by staff at the facility. Services provided by our tenants in these facilities are primarily paid for by the residents directly or through private insurance and are less reliant on government reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. All of ourOur senior housing facilities are leased to single tenants under triple-net lease structures.structures, whereby the tenant is responsible for making rent payments, maintaining the properties and paying taxes and other expenses. Leases are typically 12 to 15 years with fixed annual escalations and required lease coverage ratios. Our senior housing segment accounted for approximately 1.9%1.5%, 2.0%1.9% and 1.9%2.0% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, respectively.
Senior Housing — RIDEA. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we owned and operated 1320 senior housing facilities utilizing a RIDEA structure. Such facilities are of a similar property type as our senior housing segment discussed above; however, we have entered into agreements with healthcare operators to manage the facilities on our behalf utilizing a RIDEA structure. The healthcare operators we engage provide management and operational services at the facilities, and we retain the net earnings generated by the performance of each of the facilities after payment of the management fee and other operational and maintenance expenses. As a result, under a RIDEA structure we retain the upside from improved operational performance, and similarly the risk of any decline in performance. Substantially all of our leases with residents in the senior housing facilities are for a term of one year or less. Our senior housing — RIDEA segment accounted for approximately 5.7%5.6%, 6.1%5.7% and 6.3%6.1% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, respectively.
Integrated Senior Health Campuses. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we owned and/or operated 112118 integrated senior health campuses, a majority of which are operated utilizing a RIDEA structure. Integrated senior health campuses include a range of senior care, including assisted living, memory care, independent living, skilled nursing services and certain ancillary businesses. Services provided in these facilities are primarily paid for by the residents directly or through private insurance and are less reliant on government reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. Our integrated senior health campuses segment accounted for approximately 82.9%84.3%, 81.8%82.9% and 81.8% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, respectively.
For a further discussion of our segment reporting for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016, including geographic information for our operations,2017, see Note 19, Segment Reporting, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Investment Risks
There is no public market for the shares of our common stock. Therefore, it will be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares of our common stock and, if our stockholders are able to sell their shares of our common stock, they will likely sell them at a substantial discount.
We commenced a best efforts initial public offering on February 26, 2014 and terminated the primary portion of our initial offering on March 12, 2015. However, there currently is no public market for the shares of our common stock. We do not expect a public market for our stock to develop prior to the listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, which we do not expect to occur in the near future and which may not occur at all. Additionally, our charter contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of shares of our stock and these restrictions may inhibit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares of our common stock. Our charter provides that no person may own more than 9.9% in value of our issued and outstanding shares of capital stock or more than 9.9% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. Any purported transfer of the shares of our common stock that would result in a violation of either of these limits will result in such shares being transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary or such transfer being declared null and void. We have adopted a share repurchase plan, but it is limited in terms of the amount of shares of our common stock which may be repurchased annually and is subject to our boardboard’s discretion. Our board may also amend, suspend, or terminate our share repurchase plan at any time upon 30 days’ written notice. Therefore, it will be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares of our common stock promptly or at all. If our stockholders are able to sell their shares of our common stock, our stockholders may only be able to sell them to an unrelated third party at a substantial discount from the price they paid. This may be the result, in part, of the fact that, at the time we makemade our investments, the amount of funds available for investment may bewere reduced by up to 12.0% of the gross offering proceeds, which amounts have beenwere used to pay selling commissions, a dealer manager fee and other organizational and offering expenses. We also arewere required to use gross offering proceeds to pay acquisition fees, acquisition expenses and asset management fees. Unless our aggregate investments increase in value to compensate for these fees and expenses, which may not occur, it is unlikely that our stockholders will be able to sell their shares of our common stock, whether pursuant to our share repurchase plan or otherwise, without incurring a substantial loss. We cannot assure our stockholders that their shares of our common stock will ever appreciate in value to equal the price our stockholders paid for their shares of our common stock. Therefore, shares of our common stock should be considered illiquid and a long-term investment and our stockholders must be prepared to hold their shares of our common stock for an indefinite length of time.
The estimated value per share of our common stock may not reflectbe an accurate reflection of fair value of our assets and liabilities and likely will not represent the valueamount of net proceeds that stockholders will receive for their investment.would result if we were liquidated or dissolved or completed a merger or other sale of our company.
On October 3, 2018,2019, our board, at the recommendation of the audit committee of our board, comprised solely of independent directors, unanimously approved and established the most recentan updated estimated per share NAV of our common stock of $9.37.$9.40. We are providing this updated estimated per share NAV to assist broker-dealers in connection with their obligations under National Association of Securities Dealers ConductFINRA Rule 2340, as required by FINRA2231, with respect to customer account statements. The valuation was performed in accordance with the methodology provided in Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs, issued by the IPA in April 2013, in addition to guidance from the SEC.
The most recentupdated estimated per share NAV was determined after consultation with our advisor and an independent third-party valuation firm, the engagement of which was approved by the audit committee of our board. FINRA rules provide no guidance on the methodology an issuer must use to determine its estimated per share NAV. As with any valuation methodology, our independent valuation firm’s methodology is based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated per share NAV, and these differences could be significant.
The most recentupdated estimated per share NAV was not audited or reviewed by our independent registered public accounting firm and does not represent the fair value of our assets or liabilities according to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Accordingly, with respect to the most recentupdated estimated per share NAV, we can give no assurance that:
a stockholder would be able to resell his or her shares at our most recentupdated estimated per share NAV;
a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to our most recentupdated estimated per share NAV upon liquidation of our assets and settlement of our liabilities or a sale of the company;
our shares of common stock would trade at our most recentupdated estimated per share NAV on a national securities exchange;
an independent third-party appraiser or other third-party valuation firm, other than the third-party valuation firm engaged by our board to assist in its determination of the most recentupdated estimated per share NAV, would agree with our estimated per share NAV; or
the methodology used to estimate our most recentupdated per share NAV would be acceptable to FINRA or comply with reporting requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, or ERISA, the Code, other applicable law, or the applicable provisions of a retirement plan or individual retirement account, or IRA.
Further, the most recentupdated estimated per share NAV is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of June 30, 2018.2019. The value of our shares may fluctuate over time in response to developments related to individual assets in the portfolio and the management of those assets and in response to the real estate and finance markets. Going forward, weWe intend to continue to engage an independent valuation firm to assist us with publishing an updated estimated per share NAV on at least an annual basis.
For a full description of the methodologies used to value our assets and liabilities in connection with the calculation of the most recentupdated estimated per share NAV, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 4, 2018.2019.
It may be difficult to accurately reflect recent and material events that may impact our estimated per share NAV between valuations and accordingly, we may be repurchasing shares at too high or too low a price.
Our independent valuation firm will calculate estimates of the market value of our real estate investments, and our board will determine the net value of our real estate investments and liabilities taking into consideration such estimate provided by the independent valuation firm. Our board is ultimately responsible for determining the estimated per share NAV. Since our board determines our estimated per share NAV at least annually, there may be changes in the value of our assets that are not fully reflected in the updated estimated per share NAV. As a result, the published estimated per share NAV may not fully reflect changes in value that may have occurred since the prior valuation. Furthermore, our advisor will monitor our portfolio, but it may be difficult to reflect changing market conditions or material events that may impact the value of our portfolio between valuations, or to obtain timely or complete information regarding any such events. Therefore, the estimated per share NAV published before the announcement of an extraordinary event may differ significantly from our actual per share NAV until such time as sufficient information is available and analyzed, the financial impact is fully evaluated, and the appropriate adjustment is made to our estimated per share NAV, as determined by our board. Any resulting disparity may be to the detriment of a stockholder selling shares pursuant to our share repurchase plan.
We have experienced losses in the past and we may experience additional losses in the future.
Historically, we have experienced net losses (calculated in accordance with GAAP) and we may not be profitable or realize growth in the value of our investments. Many of our losses can be attributed to start-up costs, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, as well as acquisition expenses incurred in connection with purchasing properties or making other investments. For a further discussion of our operational history and the factors affecting our losses, see Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.
We have not had sufficient cash available from operations to pay distributions, and therefore, we have paid a portion of distributions from the net proceeds of our initial offering and borrowings, and in the future, may continue to pay distributions from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flows or from other sources. Any such distributions may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in assets, may negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment and may cause subsequent investors to experience dilution.
We have used the net proceeds from our initial offering, borrowings and our advisor has waived certain fees payable to it, and in the future, may use borrowed funds or other sources, to pay cash distributions to our stockholders, which may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations, cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds or cause subsequent investors to experience dilution. Further, if the aggregate amount of cash distributed in any given year exceeds the amount of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess amount will be deemed a return of capital. Therefore, distributions payable to our stockholders may partially include a return of capital, rather than a return on capital.capital, and we have paid a portion of our distributions from the net proceeds of our initial offering. We have not established any limit on the amount of net proceeds from our initial offering or borrowings that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or (ii) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences. The actual amount and timing of distributions is determined
by our board in its sole discretion and typically depends on the amount of funds available for distribution, which will depend on items such as our financial condition, current and projected capital expenditure requirements, tax considerations and annual distribution requirements needed to qualifymaintain our qualification as a REIT. As a result, our distribution rate and payment frequency may vary from time to time.
Our board has authorized, on a quarterly basis, a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the quarterly periods commencing on May 14, 2014 and ending on June 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. The daily distributions were or will be calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and are equal to $0.001643836 per share of our common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution of $0.60 per share. These daily distributions were or will be aggregated and paid in cash or shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings monthly in arrears, only from legally available funds.
The distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to the 2015our DRIP OfferingOfferings, and the sources of our distributions as compared to cash flows from operations were as follows:
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Distributions paid in cash | $ | 59,974,000 |
| | | | $ | 55,777,000 |
| | | $ | 62,612,000 |
| | | | $ | 59,974,000 |
| | |
| Distributions reinvested | 60,030,000 |
| | | | 63,008,000 |
| | | 55,440,000 |
| | | | 60,030,000 |
| | |
| | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | | $ | 118,052,000 |
| | | | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | |
| Sources of distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash flows from operations | $ | 106,814,000 |
| | 89.0 | % | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 117,454,000 |
| | 99.5 | % | | $ | 106,814,000 |
| | 89.0 | % |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 13,190,000 |
| | 11.0 |
| | | | — |
| 598,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 13,190,000 |
| | 11.0 |
|
| | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 118,052,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | 100 | % |
Under GAAP, certain acquisition related expenses, such as expenses incurred in connection with property acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, are expensed, and therefore, subtracted from cash flows from operations. However, these expenses may be paid from debt.
AnyAs of December 31, 2019, any distributions of amounts in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits have resulted in a return of capital to our stockholders, and all or any portion of a distribution to our stockholders may have been paid from net offering proceeds and borrowings. The payment of distributions from our initialnet offering proceeds and borrowings could have reduced the amount of capital we ultimately invested in assets and negatively impacted the amount of income available for future distributions.
As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had an amount payable of $1,977,000$2,146,000 to our advisor or its affiliates primarily for asset and property management fees, which will be paid from cash flows from operations in the future as it becomes due and payable by us in the ordinary course of business consistent with our past practice.
As of December 31, 2018, no amounts due to our advisor or its affiliates had been deferred, waived or forgiven other than $37,000 in asset management fees waived by our advisor in 2014, which was equal to the amount of distributions payable to our stockholders for the period from May 14, 2014, the date we received and accepted subscriptions aggregating at least the minimum offering of $2,000,000 required pursuant to our initial offering, through June 5, 2014, the day prior to the date we acquired our first property. In addition, our advisor agreed to waive the disposition fees that may otherwise have been due to our advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement for the dispositions of investments within our integrated senior health campuses segment in 2017. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net — Dispositions of Real Estate Investments, and Note 14, Related Party Transactions — LiquidityOperational Stage, — Disposition Fees, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion. Our advisor did not receive any additional securities, shares of our stock, or any other form of consideration or any repayment as a result of the waiver of such asset management fees and disposition fees. Other than the waiver of asset management fees in 2014 and disposition fees in 2017 by our advisor discussed above, our advisor and its affiliates, including our co-sponsors, have no obligation to defer or forgive fees owed by us to our advisor or its affiliates or to advance any funds to us. In the future, if our advisor or its affiliates do not defer, waive or forgive amounts due to them, this would negatively affect our cash flows from operations, which could result in us paying distributions, or a portion thereof, using borrowed funds. As a result, the amount of proceeds from borrowings available for investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.
10-K.
The distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to the 2015our DRIP OfferingOfferings, and the sources of our distributions as compared to funds from operations attributable to controlling interest, or FFO, were as follows:
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Distributions paid in cash | $ | 59,974,000 |
| | | | $ | 55,777,000 |
| | | $ | 62,612,000 |
| | | | $ | 59,974,000 |
| | |
| Distributions reinvested | 60,030,000 |
| | | | 63,008,000 |
| | | 55,440,000 |
| | | | 60,030,000 |
| | |
| | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | | $ | 118,052,000 |
| | | | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | |
| Sources of distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FFO attributable to controlling interest | $ | 96,958,000 |
| | 80.8 | % | | $ | 113,464,000 |
| | 95.5 | % | $ | 91,159,000 |
| | 77.2 | % | | $ | 96,958,000 |
| | 80.8 | % |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 23,046,000 |
| | 19.2 |
| | 5,321,000 |
| | 4.5 |
| 26,893,000 |
| | 22.8 |
| | 23,046,000 |
| | 19.2 |
|
| | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 118,052,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | 100 | % |
The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. For a further discussion of FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, including a reconciliation of our GAAP net income (loss) to FFO, see Part II, Item 6, Selected Financial Data.
Our stockholders may not be able to adequately evaluate our ability to achieve our investment objectives, and the prior performance of other programs sponsored or co-sponsored by American Healthcare Investors and Griffin Capital may not be an accurate predictor of our future results.
We were formed in January 2013, did not engage in any material business operations prior to the effective date of our initial offering and acquired our first property in June 2014. As a result, an investment in shares of our common stock may entail more risks than the shares of common stock of a REIT with a more substantial operating history. In addition, our stockholders should not rely on the past performance of other American Healthcare Investors or Griffin Capital-sponsored or co-sponsored programs to predict our future results. Our stockholders should consider our prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies like ours that do not have a substantial operating history, many of which may be beyond our control. For example, due to challenging economic conditions in the past, distributions to stockholders of several private real estate programs sponsored by Griffin Capital were suspended. Therefore, to be successful in this market, we must, among other things:
identify and acquire investments that further our investment strategy;
rely on our dealer manager to maintain its network of licensed securities brokers and other agents;
attract, integrate, motivate and retain qualified personnel to manage our day-to-day operations;
respond to competition both for investment opportunities and potential investors’ investment in us; and
build and expand our operational structure to support our business.
We cannot guarantee that we will succeed in achieving these goals, and our failure to do so could adversely affect our results of operations and cause our stockholders to lose all or a portion of their investment and adversely effect our results of operations.
Our success is dependent on the performance of our co-sponsors. Our co-sponsors and certain of their key personnel will face competing demands relating to their time or fiduciary duties and this may cause our operating results to suffer.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to conduct our operations is dependent upon the performance of our advisor. Our advisor is a joint venture between our two co-sponsors, in which American Healthcare Investors indirectly owns a 75.0% interest and its key personnel serve as key personnel and co-sponsor of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc., may sponsor or co-sponsor additional real estate programs in the future, and provide certain asset management and property management services to certain of Colony Capital’s managed companies.Griffin Capital indirectly owns a 25.0% interest.
Griffin Capital and certain of its key personnel and its respective affiliates serve as key personnel, advisors, managers and sponsors or co-sponsors of 1211 other Griffin Capital-sponsored programs, including Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc., or GA Healthcare REIT IV, Griffin Institutional Access Real Estate Fund, or GIA Real Estate, and Griffin Institutional Access Credit Fund, or GIA Credit Fund, and may have other business interests as well. In addition, American Healthcare Investors and its key personnel serve as key personnel and co-sponsor of GA Healthcare REIT IV and may sponsor or co-sponsor additional real estate programs in the future. Because these persons have competing demands on their time and resources, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and fewer resources to our business than is necessary or appropriate. If this occurs, the returns on our stockholders’ investment may suffer.
In addition, executive officers of Griffin Capital also are officers of our dealer manager and other affiliated entities. As a result, Also, since these individuals owe fiduciary duties to these other entities and their owners, which fiduciary duties may conflict with the duties that they owe to our stockholders and us. Theirus, their loyalties to these other entities could result in actions or inactions that are detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our investment objectives. Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to allocation of management time and services between us and the other entities. Accordingly, competing demands of Griffin Capitalsuch key personnel may cause us to be unable to successfully implement our investment objectives or generate cash needed to make distributions to our stockholders, and to maintain or increase the value of our assets.
Additionally, our co-sponsors’ ability to manage our operations successfully is impacted by trends in the general economy, as well as the commercial real estate and credit markets. The current macroeconomic environment may negatively impact the value of commercial real estate assets and contribute to a general slow-down in our industry, which could put downward pressure on our co-sponsors’ revenues and operating results. Since American Healthcare Investors is 47.1% owned by AHI Group Holdings and 45.1% indirectly owned by Colony Capital, our company may not realize the anticipated benefits of the relationship with Colony Capital due to, among other things, the economic and overall conditions of the healthcare real estate industry, conflicts of interests relating to the purchase and leasing of healthcare properties, or American Healthcare Investors and Colony Capital having overlapping interests that could exacerbate other potential conflicts or disputes. To the extent that any of these factors may cause a decline in our co-sponsors’ operating results or revenues, the performance of our advisor may be impacted and in turn, our results of operations and financial condition could also suffer.
Our stockholders may be unable to sell their shares of our common stock because their ability to have their shares of our common stock repurchased pursuant to our share repurchase plan is subject to significant restrictions and limitations.
Our share repurchase plan includes significant restrictions and limitations. Except in the cases of death or qualifying disability, our stockholders must hold their shares of our common stock for at least one year. RequestingOur stockholders must present at least 25.0% of their shares of our common stock for repurchase and until they have held their shares of our common stock for at least four years, repurchases will be made for less than our stockholders paid for their shares of our common stock. Shares of our common stock may be repurchased quarterly, at our discretion, on a pro rata basis, and are generally limited during any calendar year to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock will come exclusively from the cumulative proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings. Additionally, effective with respect to share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter 2019, the number of shares that we will repurchase during any fiscal quarter generally will be limited to an amount equal to the net proceeds that we received from the sale of shares issued pursuant to the DRIP Offerings during the immediately preceding completed fiscal quarter; provided however, that shares subject to a repurchase requested upon the death or qualifying disability of a stockholder will not be subject to this quarterly cap or to our existing cap on repurchases to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the calendar year prior to the repurchase date.
Furthermore, our board may reject share repurchase requests in its sole discretion and reserves the right to amend, suspend or terminate our share repurchase plan at any time upon 30 days’ written notice. Therefore, in making a decision to purchase shares of our common stock, our stockholders should not assume that they will be able to sell any of their shares of our common stock back to us pursuant to our share repurchase plan and our stockholders also should understand that the repurchase price will not necessarily correlate to the value of our real estate holdings or other assets. If our board terminates our share repurchase plan, our stockholders may not be able to sell their shares of our common stock even if our stockholders deem it necessary or desirable to do so.
Our stockholders are limited in their ability to sell their shares pursuant to our share repurchase plan and may have to hold their shares for an indefinite period of time.
Our board has rejected and may reject any request for repurchase of shares, suspend (in whole or in part) the share repurchase plan at any time and from time to time upon notice to our stockholders and amend, suspend, reduce, terminate or otherwise change our share repurchase plan at any time upon 30 days’ notice to our stockholders for any reason it deems appropriate. Because we only repurchase shares on a quarterly basis, depending upon when during the quarter our board makes this determination, it is possible that our stockholders would not have any additional opportunities to have their shares repurchased under the prior terms of the program, or at all, upon receipt of the notice. In addition, the share repurchase plan includes numerous restrictions that would limit stockholders’ ability to sell their shares. Generally, stockholders must have held their shares for at least one year in order to participate in our share repurchase program, subject to the right of our board to waive such holding requirement in the event of the death or qualifying disability of a stockholder. Unless the shares of our common stock are being repurchased in connection with a stockholder’s death or qualifying disability, the purchase price for shares repurchased under our share repurchase program will be as set forth below. We do not currently anticipate obtaining appraisals for our investments (other than investments in transactions with affiliates), and, accordingly, the estimated value of our investments should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the fair market value of our investments nor will they represent the amount of net proceeds that would result from an immediate sale of our assets. The Repurchase Amount, as such term is defined in our share repurchase plan, as amended, is equal to the lesser of (i) the amount per share that a stockholder paid for their shares of our common stock, or (ii) the most recent estimated value of one share of our common stock, as determined by our board. Accordingly, we will repurchase shares as follows: (a) for stockholders who have continuously held their shares of our common stock for at least one year, the price will be 92.5% of the Repurchase Amount; (b) for stockholders who have continuously held their shares of our common stock for at least two years, the price will be 95.0% of the Repurchase Amount; (c) for stockholders who have continuously held their shares of our common stock for at least three years, the price will be 97.5% of the Repurchase Amount; (d) for stockholders who have held their shares of our common stock for at least four years, the price will be 100% of the Repurchase Amount; and (e) for requests submitted pursuant to a death or qualifying disability, the price will be 100% of the
amount per share the stockholder paid for their shares of common stock (in each case, as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock). These limits might prevent us from accommodating all repurchase requests made in any year. These restrictions severely limit our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares should they require liquidity, and limit their ability to recover the value such stockholders invested or the fair market value of their shares. As a result, stockholders should not rely on our share repurchase plan to provide them with liquidity. On October 3, 2018,2019, our board approved and established the most recentupdated estimated per share NAV of our common stock of $9.37.$9.40.
It may be difficult to accurately reflect material events that may impact our estimated per share NAV between valuations and accordingly, we may be repurchasing shares at too high or too low a price.
Our independent valuation firm will calculate estimates of the market value of our real estate investments, and our board will determine the net value of our real estate investments and liabilities taking into consideration such estimate provided by the independent valuation firm. Our board is ultimately responsible for determining the estimated per share NAV. Since our board determines our estimated per share NAV at least annually, there may be changes in the value of our assets that are not fully reflected in the most recent estimated per share NAV. As a result, the published estimated per share NAV may not fully reflect changes in value that may have occurred since the prior valuation. Furthermore, our advisor will monitor our portfolio, but it may be difficult to reflect changing market conditions or material events that may impact the value of our portfolio between valuations, or to obtain timely or complete information regarding any such events. Therefore, the estimated per share NAV published before the announcement of an extraordinary event may differ significantly from our actual per share NAV until such time as sufficient information is available and analyzed, the financial impact is fully evaluated, and the appropriate adjustment is made to our estimated per share NAV, as determined by our board. Any resulting disparity may be to the detriment of a stockholder selling shares pursuant to our share repurchase plan.
Our advisor may be entitled to receive significant compensation in the event of our liquidation or in connection with a termination of the Advisory Agreement, even if such termination is the result of poor performance by our advisor.
We are externally advised by our advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement between us and our advisor, which has a one-year term that expires on February 26, 20202021 and is subject to successive one-year renewals upon the mutual consent of us and our advisor. In the event of a partial or full liquidation of our assets, our advisor will be entitled to receive an incentive distribution equal to 15.0% of the remaining net proceeds of the liquidation, after distributions to our stockholders, in the aggregate, of a full return of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock) plus an annual 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the shares of our common stock, as adjusted for distribution of net sale proceeds. In the event of a termination of the Advisory Agreement in connection with the listing of our common stock on a national securities exchange, the partnership agreement provides that our advisor will receive an incentive distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units equal to 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which (i) the market value of our outstanding common stock at listing plus distributions paid by us prior to the listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, exceeds (ii) the sum of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock) plus the amount of cash equal to an annual 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock through the date of listing. Upon our advisor’s receipt of the incentive distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units, our advisor will not be entitled to receive any further incentive distributions upon sales of our properties. Further, in connection with the termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement other than due to a listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, our advisor shall be entitled to receive a distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units equal to 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which (i) the appraised value of our assets on the termination date, less any indebtedness secured by such assets, plus total distributions paid through the termination date, exceeds (ii) the sum of the total amount of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock) and the total amount of cash equal to an annual 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded return to our stockholders on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock through the termination date. Such distribution upon termination of the Advisory Agreement is payable to our advisor even upon termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement as a result of poor performance by our advisor. Upon our advisor’s receipt of this distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units, our advisor will not be entitled to receive any further incentive distributions upon sales of our properties. Any amounts to be paid to our advisor in connection with the termination of the Advisory Agreement cannot be determined at the present time, but such amounts, if paid, will reduce the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may not effect a liquidity event within our targeted time frame of five years after the completion of our offering stage, or at all. If we do not effect a liquidity event, our stockholders may have to hold their investment in shares of our common stock for an indefinite period of time.
On a limited basis, our stockholders may be able to sell shares of our common stock to us through our share repurchase plan. However, in the future we may also consider various forms of liquidity events, including but not limited to: (i) the listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange; (ii) our sale or merger in a transaction that provides our
stockholders with a combination of cash and/or securities of a publicly traded company; and (iii) the sale of all or substantially all of our real estate and real estate-related investments for cash or other consideration. We presently intend to effect a liquidity event within five years after the completion of our offering stage, which we deem to be the completion of our initial offering and any subsequent public offerings, excluding any offerings pursuant to our DRIP Offerings, or that are limited to any benefit plans. However, we are not obligated, through our charter or otherwise, to effectuate a liquidity event and may not effectwithin a liquidity event within suchspecified time frame or at all. If we do not effect a liquidity event, it will be very difficult for our stockholders to have liquidity for their investment in the shares of our common stock other than limited liquidity through our share repurchase plan.
Because a portion of our offering price from the sale of shares of our common stock was used to pay expenses and fees, the full offering price paid by our stockholders was not invested in real estate investments. As a result, our stockholders will only receive a full return of their invested capital if we either (i) sell our assets or our company for a sufficient amount in excess of the original purchase price of our assets, or (ii) list the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange and the market value of our company after we list is substantially in excess of the original purchase price of our assets.
Our board may change our investment objectives without seeking our stockholders’ approval.
Our board may change our investment objectives without seeking our stockholders’ approval if our directors, in accordance with their fiduciary duties to our stockholders, determine that a change is in our stockholders’ best interest. A change in our investment objectives could reduce our payment of cash distributions to our stockholders or cause a decline in the value of our investments.
Our results of operations, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and our ability to dispose of our investments are subject to international, national and local economic factors we cannot control or predict.
Our results of operations are subject to the risks of a international or national economic slowdown or downturn and other changes in national and local economic conditions. The following factors may affect income from our properties, our ability to acquire and dispose of properties, and yields from our properties:
poor economic times may result in defaults by tenants of our properties due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, or operational failures. We may also be required to provide rent concessions, tenant improvement expenditures or reduced rental rates to maintain or increase occupancy levels;
fluctuations in property values as a result of increases or decreases in construction activity, supply and demand, occupancies and rental rates may cause the properties that we acquire to decrease in value. Consequently, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, which may require us to recognize an impairment charge or record a loss on sale in earnings;
reduced values of our properties may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or to obtain debt financing secured by our properties and may reduce the availability of unsecured loans;
the value and liquidity of our short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold our cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which we have made short-term investments, the dislocation of the markets for our short-term investments, increased volatility in market rates for such investment or other factors;
our lenders under a line of credit could refuse to fund their financing commitment to us or could fail and we may not be able to replace the financing commitment of such lender on favorable terms, or at all;
increases in index rates and lender spreads or other regulatory or market factors affecting the banking and commercial mortgage-backed securities industries may increase overall borrowing costs;
one or more counterparties to our interest rate swaps could default on their obligations to us or could fail, increasing the risk that we may not realize the benefits of these instruments;
increases in supply of competing properties or decreases in demand for our properties may impact our ability to maintain or increase occupancy levels and rents;
constricted access to credit may result in tenant defaults or non-renewals under leases;
job transfers and layoffs may lead to a lower demand for medical services and cause vacancies to increase and a lack of future population and job growth may make it difficult to maintain or increase occupancy levels;
future disruptions in the financial markets, deterioration in economic conditions or a public health crisis, such as coronavirus, may result in lower occupancy in our facilities, increased vacancy rates for commercial real estate due to generally lower demand for rentable space, as well as potential oversupply of rentable space;
governmental actions and initiatives, including risks associated with the impact of a prolonged government shutdown or budgetary reductions or impasses; and
increased insurance premiums, real estate taxes or utilities or other expenses may reduce funds available for distribution or, to the extent such increases are passed through to tenants, may lead to tenant defaults. Also, any such increased expenses may make it difficult to increase rents to tenants on turnover, which may limit our ability to increase our returns.
The length and severity of any economic slowdown or downturn cannot be predicted. Our results of operations, our ability to continue to pay distributions to our stockholders and our ability to dispose of our investments may be negatively impacted to the extent an economic slowdown or downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe.
We face competition for the acquisition of medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities, which may impede our ability to make acquisitions or may increase the cost of these acquisitions and may reduce our profitability and could cause our stockholders to experience a lower return on our stockholders’ investment.
We compete with many other entities engaged in real estate investment activities for acquisitions of medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities, including international, national, regional and local operators, acquirers and developers of healthcare and real estate properties, as well as Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc. The competition for healthcare real estate properties may significantly increase the price we must pay for medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities or other assets we seek to acquire, and our competitors may succeed in acquiring those properties or assets themselves. In addition, our potential acquisition targets may find our competitors to be more attractive because they may have greater resources, may be willing to pay more for the properties or may have a more compatible operating philosophy. In particular, larger healthcare REITs may enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. In addition, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investment properties may increase. This competition will result in increased demand for these assets, and therefore, increased prices paid for them. If there is an increased interest in single-property acquisitions among tax-motivated individual purchasers, we may pay higher prices per property if we purchase single properties in comparison with portfolio acquisitions. If we pay higher prices per property for medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing or other healthcare-related facilities,
our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders may be materially and adversely affected and our stockholders may experience a lower return on their investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
The availability and timing of cash distributions to our stockholders is uncertain. If we fail to pay distributions, our stockholders’ investment in shares of our common stock could suffer.
We expect to continue to pay distributions to our stockholders monthly. However, we bear all expenses incurred in our operations, which are deducted from cash flows generated by operations prior to computing the amount of cash distributions to our stockholders. In addition, our board, in its discretion, may retain any portion of such funds for working capital. We cannot assure our stockholders that sufficient cash will be available to pay distributions to them monthly, or at all. Should we fail for any reason to distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, we would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs.
Actual or threatened public health epidemics, pandemics or outbreaks, such as a severe cold and flu season, the coronavirus, or any other widespread illnesses, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
If an actual or threatened public health epidemic, pandemic, or outbreaks, such as a severe cold and flu season, the coronavirus, or any other widespread illness were to affect the markets in which we or our tenants operate, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Such a crisis could diminish the public trust in healthcare facilities, especially hospitals or facilities that fail to accurately or timely diagnose, or other facilities such as medical office buildings that are treating (or have treated) patients affected by contagious diseases. If any of our facilities were involved in treating patients for such a contagious disease, other patients might cancel elective procedures or fail to seek needed care from our or our tenants’ facilities. Additionally, our revenues and our operators’ revenues are dependent on occupancy. The occupancy of our integrated senior health campuses, senior housing and skilled nursing facilities could significantly decrease in the event of an epidemic or any other widespread illness. Such a decrease could affect the operating income of our integrated senior health campuses, senior housing and skilled nursing facilities and the ability of our operators to make payments to us. In addition, a flu pandemic or other widespread illness such as coronavirus could significantly increase the cost burdens faced by our operators, including if they are required to increase staffing and/or implement quarantines for residents. Further, a pandemic might adversely impact our tenants’ and operators’ businesses by causing a temporary shutdown or diversion of patients, by disrupting or delaying production and delivery of materials and products in the supply chain or by causing staffing shortages in those facilities, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and our ability to pay distributions.
We are uncertain of all of our sources of debt or equity for funding our capital needs. If we cannot obtain funding on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire, and make necessary capital improvements to, properties may be impaired or delayed.
To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our stockholders at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains. Because of this distribution requirement, it is not likely that we will be able to fund
a significant portion of our capital needs from retained earnings. We have in place the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement; however, we have not identified all of our sources of debt or equity for funding, and such sources of funding may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all. If we do not have access to sufficient funding in the future, we may not be able to acquire, and make necessary capital improvements to, properties, pay other expenses or expand our business.
We use mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, could hinder our ability to pay distributions and could decrease the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We have financed, and will continue to finance, all or a portion of the purchase price of our investments in real estate and real estate-related investments by borrowing funds. We anticipate that our overall leverage will not exceed 45.0% of the combined market value of our real estate and real estate-related investments, as determined at the end of each calendar year. Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of our net assets without the approval of a majority of our independent directors. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally speaking, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate-related investments before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional real properties or for working capital. We may also borrow funds to satisfy the REIT tax qualification requirement that we distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders. Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we qualify and maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
High debt levels may cause us to incur higher interest charges, which would result in higher debt service payments and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. If there is a shortfall between the cash flows from a property and the cash flows needed to service mortgage debt on that property, then the amount available for distributions to our stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of our stockholders’ investment. In addition, lenders may have recourse to assets other than those specifically securing the repayment of indebtedness. For tax purposes, a foreclosure on any of our properties will be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we will recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but we would not receive any cash proceeds. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt to the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgage contains cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.
Higher mortgage rates may make it more difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can develop or acquire and the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
If mortgage debt is unavailable on reasonable terms as a result of increased interest rates or other factors, we may not be able to finance the development or initial purchase of properties. In addition, if we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance such debt when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when we refinance debt, our income could be reduced. We may be unable to refinance debt at appropriate times, which may require us to sell properties on terms that are not advantageous to us, or could result in the foreclosure of such properties. If any of these events occur, our cash flows would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing securities or by borrowing more money.
The market environment may adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Any deterioration of financial conditions could have the potential to materially adversely affect the value of our properties and other investments, the availability or the terms of financing that we may anticipate utilizing, our ability to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance, certain property acquisitions or refinance any debt at maturity, and/or, for our leased properties, the ability of our tenants to enter into new leasing transactions or satisfy rental payments under existing leases. The market environment also could affect our operating results and financial condition as follows:
Debt Markets — The debt market remains sensitive to the macro environment, such as Federal Reserve policy, market sentiment or regulatory factors affecting the banking and commercial mortgage-backed securities industries. Should overall borrowing costs increase, due to either increases in index rates or increases in lender spreads, our operations may generate lower returns.
Real Estate Markets — Changes in property values may fluctuate as a result of increases or decreases in construction activity, supply and demand, occupancies and rental rates. As a result, the properties we acquire could substantially decrease in value after we purchase them. Consequently, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of our properties, which may require us to recognize an impairment charge or record a loss on sale in earnings.
Our results of operations, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and our ability to dispose of our investments are subject to national and local economic factors we cannot control or predict.
Our results of operations are subject to the risks of a national economic slowdown or downturn and other changes in national and local economic conditions. The following factors may affect income from our properties, our ability to acquire and dispose of properties, and yields from our properties:
poor economic times may result in defaults by tenants of our properties due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, or operational failures. We may also be required to provide rent concessions or reduced rental rates to maintain or increase occupancy levels;
reduced values of our properties may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or to obtain debt financing secured by our properties and may reduce the availability of unsecured loans;
the value and liquidity of our short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold our cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which we have made short-term investments, the dislocation of the markets for our short-term investments, increased volatility in market rates for such investment or other factors;
our lenders under a line of credit could refuse to fund their financing commitment to us or could fail and we may not be able to replace the financing commitment of such lender on favorable terms, or at all;
one or more counterparties to our interest rate swaps could default on their obligations to us or could fail, increasing the risk that we may not realize the benefits of these instruments;
increases in supply of competing properties or decreases in demand for our properties may impact our ability to maintain or increase occupancy levels and rents;
constricted access to credit may result in tenant defaults or non-renewals under leases;
job transfers and layoffs may cause vacancies to increase and a lack of future population and job growth may make it difficult to maintain or increase occupancy levels;
governmental actions and initiatives, including risks associated with the impact of a prolonged government shutdown or budgetary reductions or impasses; and
increased insurance premiums, real estate taxes or utilities or other expenses may reduce funds available for distribution or, to the extent such increases are passed through to tenants, may lead to tenant defaults. Also, any such increased expenses may make it difficult to increase rents to tenants on turnover, which may limit our ability to increase our returns.
The length and severity of any economic slowdown or downturn cannot be predicted. Our results of operations, our ability to continue to pay distributions to our stockholders and our ability to dispose of our investments may be negatively impacted to the extent an economic slowdown or downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe.
Increasing vacancy rates for commercial real estate may result from any increased disruptions in the financial markets and deterioration in economic conditions, which could reduce revenue and the resale value of our properties.
We depend upon tenants for a majority of our revenue from real property investments. Future disruptions in the financial markets and deterioration in economic conditions may result in increased vacancy rates for commercial real estate, including medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities, due to generally lower demand for rentable space, as well as potential oversupply of rentable space. Increased unemployment rates may lead to reduced demand for medical services, causing physician groups and hospitals to delay expansion plans, leaving a growing number of vacancies in new buildings. Reduced demand for medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities could require us to increase concessions, tenant improvement expenditures or reduce rental rates to maintain occupancies beyond those anticipated at the time we acquire the property. In addition, the market value of a particular property could be diminished by prolonged vacancies. Future disruptions in the financial markets and deterioration in economic conditions could impact certain properties we acquire and such properties could experience higher levels of vacancy than anticipated at the time we acquire them. The value of our real estate investments could decrease below the amounts we paid for the investments. Revenues from properties could decrease due to lower occupancy rates, reduced rental rates and potential increases in uncollectible rent. We will incur expenses, such as for maintenance costs, insurance costs and property taxes, even though a property is vacant. The longer the period of significant vacancies for a property, the greater the potential negative impact on our revenues and results of operations.
We are dependent on tenants for our revenue, and lease terminations could reduce our distributions to our stockholders.
The successful performance of our real estate investments is materially dependent on the financial stability of our tenants. Lease payment defaults by tenants would cause us to lose the revenue associated with such leases and could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to our stockholders. If a property is subject to a mortgage, a default by a significant tenant on its lease payments to us may result in a foreclosure on the property if we are unable to find an alternative source of revenue to meet mortgage payments. In the event of a tenant default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. Further, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to re-lease the property for the rent previously received, if at all, or that lease terminations will not cause us to sell the property at a loss.
The integrated senior health campuses managed by TMS account for a significant portion of our revenues and/or operating income. Adverse developments in TMS’s business or financial condition could have a material adverse effect on us.
As of December 31, 2018,March 26, 2020, Trilogy Management Services, LLC, or TMS, managed all of the day-to-day operations for our integrated senior health campuses pursuant to long-term management agreements. These integrated senior health campuses represent a substantial portion of our portfolio, based on their gross book value, and account for a significant portion of our revenues and/or NOI. Although we have various rights as the owner of these integrated senior health campuses under our management agreements, we rely on TMS’s personnel, expertise, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information, good faith and judgment to manage our integrated senior health campuses operations efficiently and effectively, and to identify and manage development opportunities for new integrated senior health campuses. We also rely on TMS to provide accurate campus-level financial results for our integrated senior health campuses in a timely manner and to otherwise operate our integrated senior health campuses in compliance with the terms of our management agreements and all applicable laws and regulations. We depend on TMS’s ability to attract and retain skilled personnel to provide these services. A shortage of nurses or other trained personnel or general inflationary pressures may force TMS to enhance its pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel, but it may not be able to offset these added costs by increasing the rates charged to residents. As such, any adverse developments in TMS’s business or financial condition, including its ability to retain key personnel, could impair its ability to manage our integrated senior health campuses efficiently and effectively and could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, if TMS experiences any significant financial, legal, accounting or regulatory difficulties due to a weak economy, industry downturn or otherwise, such difficulties could result in, among other adverse events, acceleration of its indebtedness, impairment of its continued access to capital, the enforcement of default remedies by its counterparties, or the commencement of insolvency proceedings by or against it under the United States Bankruptcy Code. Any one or a combination of these risks could have a material adverse effect on us.
We have rights to terminate our management agreements with TMS for our integrated senior health campuses under any circumstances; however, we may be unable to replace TMS in the event that our management agreements are terminated or not renewed.
We continually monitor and assess our contractual rights and remedies under our management agreements with TMS. When determining whether to pursue any existing or future rights or remedies under those agreements, including termination rights, we consider numerous factors, including legal, contractual, regulatory, business and other relevant considerations. In the event that we exercise our rights to terminate management agreements with TMS for any reason or such agreements are not
renewed upon expiration of their terms, we would attempt to reposition the affected integrated senior health campuses with another manager. Although we believe that many qualified national and regional operators would be interested in managing our integrated senior health campuses, we cannot provide any assurance that we would be able to locate another suitable manager or, if we were successful in locating such a manager, that it would manage the integrated senior health campuses effectively or that any such transition would be completed timely. Any such transition would likely result in disruption of the operation of such facilities, including matters relating to staffing and reporting. Moreover, the transition to a replacement manager may require approval by the applicable regulatory authorities and, in most cases, one or more of our lenders including the mortgage lenders for the integrated senior health campuses, and we cannot provide any assurance that such approvals would be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Any inability to replace, or delay in replacing TMS as the manager of integrated senior health campuses could have a material adverse effect on us.
If a tenant declares bankruptcy, we may be unable to collect balances due under relevant leases.
Any of our current or future tenants, or any guarantor of one of our current or future tenant’s lease obligations, could be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to Title 11 of the bankruptcy laws of the United States. Such a bankruptcy filing would bar us from attempting to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from the bankrupt tenant or its properties unless we receive an enabling order from the bankruptcy court. Post-bankruptcy debts would be paid currently. If we assume a lease, all pre-bankruptcy balances owing under it must be paid in full. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have a general unsecured claim for damages. If a lease is rejected, it is unlikely we would receive any payments from the tenant because our claim would be capped at the rent reserved under the lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year or 15.0% of the remaining term of the lease, but not greater than three years, plus rent already due but unpaid. This claim could be paid only in the event funds were available, and then only in the same percentage as that realized on other unsecured claims.
The bankruptcy of a tenant or lease guarantor could delay our efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant lease, and could ultimately preclude full collection of these sums. Such an event also could cause a decrease or cessation of current rental payments, reducing our cash flows and the amounts available for distributions to our stockholders. In the event a tenant or lease guarantor declares bankruptcy, the tenant or its trustee may not assume our lease or its guaranty. If a given lease or guaranty is not assumed, our cash flows and the amounts available for distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected.
We face potential adverse consequences of bankruptcy or insolvency by our operators, borrowers, managers and other obligors.
We are exposed to the risk that our operators, borrowers, managers or other obligors may become bankrupt or insolvent. Although our loan, management and other agreements give us the right to exercise certain remedies in the event of default on the obligations owing to us or upon the occurrence of certain insolvency events, federal laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. For example, if a debtor-manager seeks bankruptcy protection, the automatic stay provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code would preclude us from enforcing our remedies against the manager unless relief is first obtained from the court having jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. In any of these events, we also may be required to fund certain expenses and obligations, e.g., real estate taxes, debt costs and maintenance expenses, to preserve the value of our properties, avoid the imposition of liens on our properties or transition our properties to a new operator or manager. Furthermore, many of our facilities are leased to healthcare providers who provide long-term custodial care to the elderly. Evicting such operators for failure to pay rent while the facility is occupied may involve specific procedural requirements and may not be successful. Additionally, the financial weakness or other inability of our operators, borrowers or managers to make payments or comply with certain other lease obligations may affect our compliance with certain covenants contained in our debt securities, credit facilities and the mortgages on the properties leased or managed by such operators or managers or otherwise adversely affect our results of operations. Under certain conditions, defaults under the underlying mortgages may result in cross default under our other indebtedness. Although we may be able to secure amendments under the applicable agreements in those circumstances, the bankruptcy of an applicable operator, borrower or manager may potentially result in less favorable borrowing terms than currently available, delays in the availability of funding or other materially adverse consequences.
Long-term leases may not result in fair market lease rates over time; therefore, our income and our distributions could be lower than if we did not enter into long-term leases.
We have entered and may continue to enter into long-term leases with tenants of certain of our properties. Our long-term leases have provided and would likely continue to provide for rent to increase over time. However, if we do not accurately judge the potential for increases in market rental rates, we may set the terms of these long-term leases at levels such that even after contractual rental increases, the rent under our long-term leases is less than then-current market rental rates. Further, we may have no ability to terminate those leases or to adjust the rent to then-prevailing market rates. As a result, our income and distributions could be lower than if we did not enter into long-term leases.
We may incur additional costs in acquiring or re-leasing properties, which could adversely affect the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may invest in properties designed or built primarily for a particular tenant of a specific type of use known as a single-user facility. If the tenant fails to renew its lease or defaults on its lease obligations, we may not be able to readily market a single-user facility to a new tenant without making substantial capital improvements or incurring other significant re-leasing costs. We also may incur significant litigation costs in enforcing our rights as a landlord against the defaulting tenant. These consequences could adversely affect our revenues and reduce the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may be unable to secure funds for future tenant or other capital improvements, which could limit our ability to attract, replace or retain tenants and decrease our stockholders’ return on investment.
When tenants do not renew their leases or otherwise vacate their space, it is common that, in order to attract replacement tenants, we have and will be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and leasing commissions related to the vacated space. Such tenant improvements have required and may continue to require us to incur substantial capital expenditures. If we have not established capital reserves for such tenant or other capital improvements, we will have to obtain financing from other sources and we have not identified any sources for such financing. We may also have future financing needs for other capital improvements to refurbish or renovate our properties. If we need to secure financing sources for tenant improvements or other capital improvements in the future, but are unable to secure such financing or are unable to secure financing on terms we feel are acceptable, we may be unable to make tenant and other capital improvements or we may be required to defer such improvements. If this happens, it may cause one or more of our properties to suffer from a greater risk of obsolescence or a decline in value, or a greater risk of decreased cash flows as a result of fewer potential tenants being attracted to the property or our existing tenants not renewing their leases. If we do not have access to sufficient funding in the future, we may not be able to make necessary capital improvements to our properties, pay other expenses or pay distributions to our stockholders.
Our success is dependent on the performance of our advisor and certain key personnel.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to conduct our operations is dependent upon the performance of our advisor in identifying and acquiring investments, the determination of any financing arrangements, the asset management of our investments and the management of our day-to-day activities. Our advisor has broad discretion over the use of proceeds from our initial offeringinvestment decisions and our stockholders will have no opportunity to evaluate the terms of transactions or other economic or financial data concerning our investments that are not described in our periodic filings with the SEC. We rely on the management ability of our advisor, subject to the oversight and approval of our board. If our advisor suffers or is distracted by adverse financial or operational problems in connection with their own operations or the operations of American Healthcare Investors or Griffin Capital unrelated to us, our advisor may be unable to allocate time and/or resources to our operations. If our advisor is unable to allocate sufficient resources to oversee and perform our operations for any reason, we may be unable to achieve our investment objectives or to pay distributions to our stockholders. In addition, our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our advisor’s officers and certain of the managing directors, officers and employees of American Healthcare Investors, in particular Jeffrey T. Hanson, Danny Prosky and Mathieu B. Streiff, each of whom would be difficult to replace. Messrs. Hanson, Prosky and Streiff currently serve as our executive officers and/or directors and Mr. Hanson also serves as Chairman of our Board of Directors. We currently do not have an employment agreement with any of Messrs. Hanson, Prosky or Streiff. In the event that Messrs. Hanson, Prosky or Streiff are no longer affiliated with American Healthcare Investors, for any reason, it could have a material adverse effect on our success and American Healthcare Investors may not be able to attract and hire as capable individuals to replace Messrs. Hanson, Prosky and/or Streiff. We do not have key man life insurance on any of our co-sponsors’ key personnel. If our advisor or American Healthcare Investors were to lose the benefit of the experience, efforts and abilities of one or more of these individuals, our operating results could suffer.
Our advisor may terminate the Advisory Agreement, which could require us to pay substantial fees and may require us to find a new advisor.
Either we or our advisor are able to terminate the Advisory Agreement subject to a 60-day transition period with respect to certain provisions of the Advisory Agreement. However, if the Advisory Agreement is terminated in connection with the listing of shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, the partnership agreement provides that our advisor will receive an incentive distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units equal to 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which (i) the market value of the outstanding shares of our common stock at listing plus distributions paid by us prior to listing, exceeds (ii) the sum of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock) plus an annual 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock. Upon our advisor’s receipt of the incentive distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units, our advisor will not be entitled to receive any further incentive distributions upon sales of our properties. Further, in connection with the termination of the Advisory Agreement other than due to a listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, our advisor shall be entitled to receive a distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units equal to
the amount that would be payable to our advisor pursuant to the incentive distribution upon sales if we liquidated all of our assets for their fair market value. Upon our advisor’s receipt of this distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units, our advisor will not be entitled to receive any further incentive distributions upon sales of our properties. Any amounts to be paid to our advisor upon termination of the Advisory Agreement cannot be determined at the present time.
If our advisor werewas to terminate the Advisory Agreement, we would need to find another advisor to provide us with day-to-day management services or have employees to provide these services directly to us. There can be no assurances that we would be able to find new advisors or employees or enter into agreements for such services on acceptable terms.
If we internalize our management functions, we could incur significant costs associated with being self-managed.
Our strategy may involve internalizing our management functions. If we internalize our management functions, we would no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expenses we expect to pay to our advisor under the Advisory Agreement; however, our direct expenses would include general and administrative costs, including legal, accounting, and other expenses related to corporate governance, SEC reporting and compliance. We would also incur the compensation and benefits costs of our officers and other employees and consultants that are now paid by our advisor or its affiliates. In addition, we may issue equity awards to officers, employees and consultants, which awards would decrease net income and FFO, and may further dilute our stockholders’ investment. We cannot reasonably estimate the amount of fees to our advisor we would save and the costs we would incur if we became self-managed. If the expenses we assume as a result of an internalization are higher than the expenses we no longer pay to our advisor, our net income per share and FFO per share may be lower as a result of the internalization than they otherwise would have been, potentially decreasing the amount of funds available to distribute to our stockholders.
As currently organized, we do not directly have any employees. If we elect to internalize our operations, we would employ personnel and would be subject to potential liabilities commonly faced by employers, such as worker’s disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes and other employee-related liabilities and grievances. Upon any internalization of our advisor, certain key personnel of our advisor or American Healthcare Investors may not be employed by us, but instead may remain employees of our co-sponsors or their affiliates.
If we internalize our management functions, we could have difficulty integrating these functions as a stand-alone entity. Currently, our advisor and its affiliates perform asset management and general and administrative functions, including accounting and financial reporting, for multiple entities. They have a great deal of know-how and can experience economies of scale. We may fail to properly identify the appropriate mix of personnel and capital needs to operate as a stand-alone entity. An inability to manage an internalization transaction effectively could, therefore, result in our incurring additional costs and/or experiencing deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting. Such deficiencies could cause us to incur additional costs, and our management’s attention could be diverted from most effectively managing our properties.
Our success is dependent on the performance of our co-sponsors.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to conduct our operations is dependent upon the performance of our advisor. Our advisor is a joint venture between our two co-sponsors, in which American Healthcare Investors owns a 75% interest and Griffin Capital indirectly owns a 25.0% interest. Our advisor’s and co-sponsors’ ability to manage our operations successfully will be impacted by trends in the general economy, as well as the commercial real estate and credit markets. The current macroeconomic environment may negatively impact the value of commercial real estate assets and contribute to a general slow-down in our industry, which could put downward pressure on our co-sponsors’ revenues and operating results. Additionally, American Healthcare Investors is 47.1% owned by AHI Group Holdings, 45.1% indirectly owned by Colony Capital and 7.8% owned by Mr. Flaherty. American Healthcare Investors and its sponsored programs, including our company, may not realize the anticipated benefits of the relationship with Colony Capital and Mr. Flaherty due to, among other things, the economic and overall conditions of the healthcare real estate industry or American Healthcare Investors, Colony Capital and Mr. Flaherty having overlapping interests that could exacerbate potential conflicts or disputes. To the extent that any decline in our co-sponsors’ revenues and operating results impacts the performance of our advisor, our results of operations and financial condition could also suffer.
Our advisor and its affiliates have no obligation to defer or forgive fees or loans or advance any funds to us, which could reduce our ability to acquire investments or pay distributions.
Other than the waiver of asset management fees by our advisor in 2014 to provide us with additional funds to pay initial distributions to our stockholders through June 5, 2014, as well as the waiver of disposition fees for the dispositions of investments within our integrated senior health campuses segment in 2017, as discussed above, our advisor and its affiliates, including our co-sponsors, have no obligation to defer or forgive fees owed by us to our advisor or its affiliates or to advance any funds to us. As a result, we may have less cash available to acquire investments or pay distributions.
We may structure acquisitions of property in exchange for limited partnership units in our operating partnership on terms that could limit our liquidity or our flexibility.
We may acquire properties by issuing limited partnership units in our operating partnership in exchange for a property owner contributing property to the partnership. If we enter into such transactions, in order to induce the contributors of such properties to accept units in our operating partnership, rather than cash, in exchange for their properties, it may be necessary for us to provide them additional incentives. For instance, our operating partnership’s limited partnership agreement provides that any holder of units may exchange limited partnership units on a one-for-one basis for shares of our common stock, or, at our option, cash equal to the value of an equivalent number of shares of our common stock. We may, however, enter into additional contractual arrangements with contributors of property under which we would agree to redeem a contributor’s units for shares of our common stock or cash, at the option of the contributor, at set times. If the contributor required us to redeem units for cash pursuant to such a provision, it would limit our liquidity and thus our ability to use cash to make other investments, satisfy other obligations or pay distributions to our stockholders. Moreover, if we were required to redeem units for cash at a time when we did not have sufficient cash to fund the redemption, we might be required to sell one or more properties to raise funds to satisfy this obligation. Furthermore, we might agree that if distributions the contributor received as a limited partner in our operating partnership did not provide the contributor with a defined return, then upon redemption of the contributor’s units we would pay the contributor an additional amount necessary to achieve that return. Such a provision could further negatively impact our liquidity and flexibility. Finally, in order to allow a contributor of a property to defer taxable gain on the contribution of property to our operating partnership, we might agree not to sell a contributed property for a defined period of time or until the contributor exchanged the contributor’s units for cash or shares of our common stock. Such an agreement would prevent us from selling those properties, even if market conditions made such a sale favorable to us.
The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions and acquire investments.
We have cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposited in certain financial institutions in excess of federally insured levels. If any banking institution in which we have deposited funds ultimately fails, we may lose the amount of our deposits over any federally-insured amount. The loss of our deposits could reduce the amount of cash we have available to distribute or invest and could result in a decline in the value of our stockholders’ investment.
Because not all REITs calculate MFFO the same way, our use of MFFO may not provide meaningful comparisons with other REITs.
We use modified funds from operations attributable to controlling interest, or MFFO, and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs, which intend to have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. However, not all REITs calculate MFFO the same way. We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s Practice Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations, or the
Practice Guideline, issued by the IPA in November 2010. If REITs use different methods of calculating MFFO, it may not be possible for investors to meaningfully compare the performance of certain REITs.
Our use of derivative financial instruments to hedge against foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations could expose us to risks that may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
We have used and may continue to use derivative financial instruments to hedge against foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, in which case we would be exposed to credit risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
Cyber incidents and cyber-attacks have been occurring globally at a more frequent and severe level and may continue to increase in frequency in the future. A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our tenant, patient and investor relationships. As our reliance on technology increases, so will the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those we outsource. There is no guarantee that any processes, procedures and
internal controls we have implemented or will implement will prevent cyber intrusions, which could have a negative impact on our financial results, operations, business relationships or confidential information.
A breach of information technology systems on which we rely could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation.
We face system security risks as we depend upon automated processes and our operators rely on information technology systems, including the Internet and networks and systems maintained and controlled by third-party vendors and other third parties, to process, transmit and store information and to manage or support our business processes. Third-party vendors collect and hold personally identifiable information and other confidential information of our tenants, patients, stockholders and employees. We also maintain confidential financial and business information regarding us and persons and entities with which we could damagedo business on our reputation, incur substantial additional costs and become subject to litigation if our systems are penetrated.
We are increasingly dependent upon automated information technology processessystems. While we and Internet commerce. Moreover,our operators take steps to protect the naturesecurity of the information maintained in our business involvesinformation technology systems, including the receiptuse of commercially available systems, software, tools and retentionmonitoring to provide security for processing, transmitting and storing of certainthe information, it is possible that such security measures will not be able to prevent human error or the systems’ improper functioning, or the loss, misappropriation, disclosure or corruption of personally identifiable information or other confidential or sensitive information, including information about our tenants operators and stockholders. We also rely extensivelyemployees. Cybersecurity breaches, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, phishing scams, attacks by hackers, breaches due to employee error or misconduct, and similar breaches, can create, and in some instances in the past resulted in, system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized access to information maintained on our information technology systems or the information technology systems of our third-party vendors or other third parties or otherwise cause disruption or negative impacts to retain data, process transactionsoccur to our business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. While we and most of our operators maintain cyber risk insurance to provide othersome coverage for certain risks arising out of cybersecurity breaches, there is no assurance that such insurance would cover all or a significant portion of the costs or consequences associated with a cybersecurity breach. As the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to information technology systems become more varied and services. These systems,sophisticated and the occurrence of such breaches becomes more frequent, we and our systems, are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, malware,third-party vendors and other destructivethird parties may be unable to adequately anticipate these techniques or disruptive security breaches and catastrophic events, such as a natural disasterimplement appropriate preventative measures. Any failure to prevent cybersecurity breaches and maintain the proper function, security and availability of our or a terrorist eventour third-party vendors’ and other third parties’ information technology systems could interrupt our operations, damage our reputation and brand, damage our competitive position, make it difficult for us to attract and retain tenants, and subject us to liability claims or cyber-attack. In addition, experienced computer programmersregulatory penalties, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and hackers may be able to penetrate our security systems and misappropriate our confidential information, create system disruptions, or cause shutdowns. Such data security breaches as well as system disruptions and shutdowns could result in additional costs to repair or replace such networks or information systems and possible legal liability, including government enforcement actions and private litigation.results of operations.
The expansion of social media platforms presents new risks and challenges.
The inappropriate use of certain social media vehicles could cause brand damage or information leakage or could lead to legal implications from the improper collection and/or dissemination of personally identifiable information or the improper dissemination of material non-public information. In addition, negative posts or comments about us on any social networking website could seriously damage our reputation. Further, the disclosure of non-public company sensitive information through external media channels could lead to information loss as there might not be structured processes in place to secure and protect information. If our non-public sensitive information is disclosed or if our reputation is seriously damaged through social media, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Many states and local jurisdictions are facing severe budgetary problems which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.
Many states and jurisdictions are facing severe budgetary problems. Action that may be taken in response to these problems, such as increases in property taxes on commercial properties, changes to sales taxes or other governmental efforts, including mandating medical insurance for employees, could adversely impact our business and results of operations.
Legislative actions and changes may cause our general and administrative costs and compliance costs to increase.
In order to comply with laws adopted by federal, state or local government or regulatory bodies, we may be required to increase our expenditures and hire additional personnel and additional outside legal, accounting and advisory services, all of which may cause our general and administrative and compliance costs to increase. Significant workforce-related legislative changes could increase our expenses and adversely affect our operations. Examples of possible workforce-related legislative changes include changes to an employer’s obligation to recognize collective bargaining units, the process by which collective bargaining agreements are negotiated or imposed, minimum wage requirements, and health care and medical and family leave mandates. In addition, changes in the regulatory environment affecting health care reimbursements, and increased compliance costs related to enforcement of federal and state wage and hour statutes and common law related to overtime, among others, could cause our expenses to increase without an ability to pass through any increased expenses through higher prices.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
We are subject to conflicts of interest arising out of relationships among us, our officers, our co-sponsors, our advisor and its affiliates, including the material conflicts discussed below.
The conflicts of interest faced by our officers may cause us not to be managed solely in our stockholders’ best interest, which may adversely affect our results of operations and the value of their investment.
All of our officers also are managing directors, officers or employees of American Healthcare Investors or other affiliated entities that have received or will receive fees in connection with our initial offering and our operations. These persons are not precluded from working with, being employed by, or investing in, any program American Healthcare Investors sponsors or may sponsor in the future. Their loyalties to these other entities could result in actions or inactions that are detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our investment strategy and our investment opportunities. Furthermore, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and resources between our business and these other activities. During times of intense activity in other programs, such persons may devote less time and fewer resources to our business than are necessary or appropriate to manage our business. Poor or inadequate management of our business would adversely affect our results of operations and the ownership value of shares of our common stock.
American Healthcare Investors’ officers face conflicts of interest relating to the allocation of their time and other resources among the various entities that they serve or have interests in, and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor.
Certain of the officers of American Healthcare Investors face competing demands relating to their time and resources because they are also or may become affiliated with entities with investment programs similar to ours, and they may have other business interests as well, including business interests that currently exist and business interests they develop in the future. Because these persons have competing interests for their time and resources, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. Further, during times of intense activity in other programs, those executives may devote less time and fewer resources to our business than are necessary or appropriate to manage our business. Poor or inadequate management of our business would adversely affect our results of operations and the ownership value of shares of our common stock.
Our co-sponsors and their affiliates also sponsor and/or advise other real estate programs that use investment strategies that are similar to ours; therefore, our executive officers and the officers and key personnel of our co-sponsors and their affiliates may face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase and leasing of properties, and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor.
We rely on our advisor as a source for all or a portion of our investment opportunities. Our advisor is jointly owned by our co-sponsors, American Healthcare Investors and Griffin Capital. Griffin Capital, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Griffin Capital Asset Management Company, LLC, indirectly owns 25.0% of our advisor. American Healthcare Investors is the managing member and owns 75.0% of our advisor, and Colony Capital is the indirect owner of approximately 45.1% of American Healthcare Investors. American Healthcare Investors and Griffin Capital co-sponsor Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc. that also invests in healthcare and healthcare-related properties. Griffin Capital currently sponsors other real estate programs, and Colony Capital and its affiliates serve as the advisor and/or sponsor to other programs, including NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc., or NHI, that invest in healthcare real estate and healthcare real estate-related assets. As a result, we may be seeking to acquire properties at the same time as one or more other real estate programs sponsored by one of our co-sponsors or advised or sponsored by Colony Capital or its affiliates, including NHI, and these other programs may use investment strategies and have investment objectives that are similar to ours. Officers and key personnel of our co-sponsors and Colony Capital and its affiliates may face conflicts of interest relating to the allocation of properties that may be acquired. American Healthcare Investors and Colony Capital have established general allocation policies to allocate healthcare real estate investment opportunities among such real estate programs, however such general allocation principles may be amended at any time and have not been adopted by our board. Nevertheless, there is a risk that the allocation of investment opportunities may result in our acquiring a property that provides lower returns to us than a property purchased by another real estate program sponsored by one or both of our co-sponsors or advised or sponsored by Colony Capital or its affiliates. In addition, we may acquire properties in geographic areas where a real estate program sponsored by one or both of our co-sponsors or advised or sponsored by Colony Capital or its affiliates own properties. If one of these other real estate programs attracts a tenant that we are competing for, we could suffer a loss of revenue due to delays in locating another suitable tenant.
Our advisor faces conflicts of interest relating to its compensation structure, including the payment of acquisition fees and asset management fees, which could result in actions that are not necessarily in our stockholders’ long-term best interest.
Under the Advisory Agreement and pursuant to the subordinated participation interest our advisor holds in our operating partnership, our advisor will be entitled to fees and distributions that are structured in a manner intended to provide incentives to our advisor to perform in both our and our stockholders’ long-term best interests. The fees to which our advisor or its affiliates will be entitled include acquisition fees, asset management fees, property management fees, disposition fees and other fees as provided for under the Advisory Agreement and agreement of limited partnership of our operating partnership. The distributions our advisor may become entitled to receive would be payable upon distribution of net sales proceeds to our stockholders, the listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, certain merger transactions or the termination of the Advisory Agreement. However, because our advisor will be entitled to receive substantial minimum compensation regardless of our performance, our advisor’s interests may not be wholly aligned with our stockholders’ interests. In that regard, our advisor or its affiliates will receive an asset management fee with respect to the ongoing operation and management of properties based on the amount of our initial investment and capital expenditures and not the performance of those investments, which could result in our advisor not having adequate incentive to manage our portfolio to provide profitable operations during the period we hold our investments. On the other hand, our advisor could be motivated to recommend riskier or more speculative investments in order to increase the fees payable to our advisor or for us to generate the specified levels of performance or net sales proceeds that would entitle our advisor to fees or distributions. Furthermore, our advisor or its affiliates will receive an acquisition fee that is based on the contract purchase price of each property acquired or the origination or acquisition price of any real estate-related investment, rather than the performance of those investments. Therefore, our advisor or its affiliates may have an incentive to recommend investments more quickly or with a higher purchase price or investments that may not produce the maximum risk adjusted returns in order to receive such acquisition fees.
Our advisor may receive economic benefits from its status as a limited partner without bearing any of the investment risk.
Our advisor is a limited partner in our operating partnership. Our advisor is entitled to receive an incentive distribution equal to 15.0% of net sales proceeds of properties after we have received and paid to our stockholders a return of their invested capital and an annual 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds of the sale of shares of our common stock. We will bear all of the risk associated with the properties but, as a result of the incentive distributions to our advisor, we are not entitled to all of our operating partnership’s proceeds from property dispositions.
The distribution payable to our advisor may influence our decisions about listing the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, merging our company with another company and acquisition or disposition of our investments.
Our advisor’s entitlement to fees upon the sale of our assets and to participate in net sales proceeds could result in our advisor recommending sales of our investments at the earliest possible time at which sales of investments would produce the level of return which would entitle our advisor to compensation relating to such sales, even if continued ownership of those investments might be in our stockholders’ long-term best interest. The subordinated participation interest may require our operating partnership to make a distribution to our advisor in redemption of its limited partnership units upon the listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange or the merger of our company with another company in which our stockholders receive shares that are traded on a national securities exchange if our advisor meets the performance thresholds included in our operating partnership’s limited partnership agreement, even if our advisor is no longer serving as our advisor. To avoid making this distribution, our independent directors may decide against listing the shares of our common stock or merging with another company even if, but for the requirement to make this distribution, such listing or merger would be in our stockholders’ best interest. In addition, the requirement to pay these fees could cause our independent directors to make different investment or disposition decisions than they would otherwise make, in order to satisfy our obligation to our advisor.
We may acquire assets from, or dispose of assets to, affiliates of our advisor, which could result in us entering into transactions on less favorable terms than we would receive from a third party or that negatively affect the public’s perception of us.
We may acquire assets from affiliates of our advisor. Further, we may also dispose of assets to affiliates of our advisor. Affiliates of our advisor may make substantial profits in connection with such transactions and may owe fiduciary and/or other duties to the selling or purchasing entity in these transactions, and conflicts of interest between us and the selling or purchasing entities could exist in such transactions. Because our independent directors would rely on our advisor in identifying and evaluating any such transaction, these conflicts could result in transactions based on terms that are less favorable to us than we would receive from a third party. Also, the existence of conflicts, regardless of how they are resolved, might negatively affect the public’s perception of us.
If weWe have entered and may continue to enter into joint ventures with other programs sponsored or advised by one of our co-sponsors or one of their affiliates, and we may face conflicts of interest or disagreements with our joint venture partners that may not be resolved as quickly or on terms as advantageous to us as would be the case if the joint venture had been negotiated at arm’s-length with an independent joint venture partner.
In the event that weWe have entered and may continue to enter into a joint ventureventures with any other programprograms sponsored or advised by one of our co-sponsors or one of their affiliates, as such we do and may face certain additional risks and potential conflicts of interest. For example, securities issued by other current or future Griffin Capital or American Healthcare Investors-sponsored programs may never have an active trading market. Therefore, if we were to become listed on a national securities exchange, we may no longer have similar goals and objectives with respect to the resale of properties in the future. Joint ventures between us and other current or future Griffin Capital or American Healthcare Investors-sponsored programs do not and will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers. Under these joint venture agreements, none of the co-venturers may have the power to control the venture, and an impasse could occur regarding matters pertaining to the joint venture, including determining when and whether to buy or sell a particular property and the timing of a liquidation, which might have a negative impact on the joint venture and decrease returns to our stockholders.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
Several potential events could cause our stockholders’ investment in us to be diluted, which may reduce the overall value of our stockholders’ investment.
Our stockholders’ investment in us could be diluted by a number of factors, including:
future offerings of our securities, including issuances pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering and up to 200,000,000 shares of any class or series of preferred stock that our board may authorize;
private issuances of our securities to other investors, including institutional investors;
issuances of our securities pursuant to our incentive plan; or
redemptions of units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership in exchange for shares of our common stock.
To the extent we issue additional equity interests, current stockholders’ percentage ownership interest in us will be diluted. In addition, depending upon the terms and pricing of any additional offerings and the value of our real estate and real estate-related investments, our stockholders may also experience dilution in the book value and fair market value of their shares of our common stock.
Our ability to issue preferred stock may include a preference in distributions superior to our common stock and also may deter or prevent a sale of shares of our common stock in which our stockholders could profit.
Our charter authorizes our board to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our board has the discretion to establish the preferences and rights, including a preference in distributions superior to our common stockholders, of any issued preferred stock. If we authorize and issue preferred stock with a distribution preference over our common stock, payment of any distribution preferences of outstanding preferred stock would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of distributions on our common stock. Further, holders of preferred stock are normally entitled to receive a preference payment in the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up before any payment is made to our common stockholders, likely reducing the amount our common stockholders would otherwise receive upon such an occurrence. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock or a separate class or series of common stock may render more difficult or tend to discourage:
a merger, tender offer or proxy contest;
assumption of control by a holder of a large block of our securities; or
removal of incumbent management.
The limit on the percentage of shares of our common stock that any person may own may discourage a takeover or business combination that may have benefited our stockholders.
Our charter restricts the direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.9% of the value of shares of our then outstanding capital stock (which includes common stock and any preferred stock we may issue) and no more than 9.9% of the value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our then outstanding common stock. This restriction may discourage a change of control of us and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for shares of our stock on terms that might be financially attractive to our stockholders or which may cause a change in our management. This ownership restriction may also prohibit business combinations that would have otherwise been approved by our board and our stockholders. In addition to deterring potential transactions that may be favorable to our stockholders, these provisions may also decrease our stockholders’ ability to sell their shares of our common stock.
Our stockholders’ ability to control our operations is severely limited.
Our board determines our major strategies, including our strategies regarding investments, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board may amend or revise these and other strategies without a vote of the stockholders. Our charter sets forth the stockholder voting rights required to be set forth therein under the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts adopted by the North American Securities Administrators Association REIT Guidelines. Under our charter and Maryland law, our stockholders have a right to vote only on the following matters:
the election or removal of directors;
the amendment of our charter, except that our board may amend our charter without stockholder approval to change our name or the name of other designation or the par value of any class or series of our stock and the aggregate par value of our stock, increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have the authority to issue, or effect certain reverse stock splits;
our dissolution; and
certain mergers, consolidations, conversions, statutory share exchanges and sales or other dispositions of all or substantially all of our assets.
All other matters are subject to the discretion of our board.
Limitations on share ownershipMaryland law prohibits certain business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us to be acquired and transfer may deter a salelimit or delay our stockholders’ ability to dispose of their shares of our common stock in which our stockholders could profit.stock.
The limits on ownership and transfer of our equity securities in our charter may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our stockholders’ common stock. The ownership limits and restrictions on transferability will continue to apply until our board determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance is no longer required for REIT qualification.
Maryland takeover statutes may deter others from seeking to acquire us and prevent our stockholders from making a profit in such transaction.
The Maryland General Corporation Law, or the MGCL, contains many provisions, such as the business combination statute and the control share acquisition statute, that are designed to prevent, or have the effect of preventing, someone from acquiring control of us. Our bylaws exempt us from the control share acquisition statute, (whichwhich eliminates voting rights for certain levels of shares that could exercise control over us)us, and our board has adopted a resolution opting out ofproviding that any business combination between us and any other person is exempted from the business combination statute, (which, among other things, prohibits a merger or consolidation with a 10.0% stockholder for a period of time) with respect to any person, provided that anysuch business combination with such person is first approved by our board.
Under the MGCL, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10.0% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock; or
an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10.0% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation.
A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if our board approved in advance the transaction by which he or she otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, our board may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by our board.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the board of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
80.0% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares of stock held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder.
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under the MGCL, for their shares of our common stock in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares of our common stock. The business combination statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the board prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder.
However, if the bylaw provisions exempting us from the control share acquisition statute or our board resolutionopting out of the business combination statute were repealed in whole or in part at any time, these provisions of Maryland lawthe MGCL could delay or prevent offers to acquire us and increase the difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if such a transaction would be in our stockholders’ best interest. Furthermore, these limits on ownership and transfer of our equity securities under the MGCL may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for our stockholders’ common stock.
The MGCL and our organizational documents limit our stockholders’ right to bring claims against our officers and directors.
The MGCL provides that a director will not have any liability as a director so long as he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interest, and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our charter provides that, subject to the applicable limitations set forth therein or under the MGCL, no director or officer will be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages. Our charter also provides that we will generally indemnify our directors, our officers, our advisor and its affiliates for losses they may incur by reason of their service in those capacities unless: (i) their act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; (ii) they actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or (iii) in the case of any criminal proceeding, they had reasonable cause to believe the act or omission was unlawful. Moreover, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers and intend to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our future directors and executive officers. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against these persons than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by these persons in some cases. However, our charter also provides that we may not indemnify our directors, our advisor and its affiliates for any loss or liability suffered by them or hold them harmless for any loss or liability suffered by us unless they have determined that the course of conduct that caused the loss or liability was in our best interest, they were acting on our behalf or performing services for us, the liability was not the result of negligence or misconduct by our non-independent directors, our advisor and its affiliates or gross negligence or willful misconduct by our independent directors, and the indemnification is recoverable only out of our net assets or the proceeds of insurance and not from our stockholders.
Maryland law prohibits certain business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us to be acquired and may limit our stockholders’ ability to dispose of their shares of our common stock.
Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. An interested stockholder is defined as:
any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10.0% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock; or
an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10.0% or more of the voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation.
A person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which he or she otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of
directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the board of directors.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:
80.0% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of the corporation; and
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the corporation other than shares of stock held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder.
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation’s common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under Maryland law, for their shares of our common stock in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares of our common stock. The business combination statute permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Our board has adopted a resolution providing that any business combination between us and any other person is exempted from this statute, provided that such business combination is first approved by our board. This resolution, however, may be altered or repealed in whole or in part at any time. If this resolution is repealed or our board fails to first approve the business combination, the business combination statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Our charter includes a provision that may discourage a stockholder from launching a tender offer for shares of our common stock.
Our charter requires that any tender offer made by a person, including any “mini-tender” offer, must comply with most of the provisions of Regulation 14D of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The offeror must provide us notice of the tender offer at least 10 business days before initiating the tender offer. If the offeror does not comply with these requirements, we will have the first right to purchase the shares of our stock at the tender offer price offered in such non-compliant tender offer. In addition, the non-complying offeror shall be responsible for all of our expenses in connection with that stockholder’s noncompliance. This provision of our charter may discourage a person from initiating a tender offer for shares of our common stock and prevent our stockholders from receiving a premium price for their shares of our common stock in such a transaction.
Our stockholders’ investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. To avoid registration as an investment company, we may not be able to operate our business successfully. If we become subject to registration under the Investment Company Act, we may not be able to continue our business.
We conduct and intend to continue to conduct our operations, and the operations of our operating partnership and any other subsidiaries, so that no such entity meets the definition of an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. Under the Investment Company Act, in relevant part, a company is an “investment company” if:
pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(A), it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or
pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(C), it is engaged, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of United States government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, or the 40% test. “Investment securities” excludes United States government securities and securities of majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.
We monitor our operations and our assets on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries, meet the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. If we were obligated to register as an investment company, we would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act imposing, among other things:
limitations on capital structure;
restrictions on specified investments;
prohibitions on transactions with affiliates;
compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations that would significantly change our operations; and
potentially, compliance with daily valuation requirements.
In order for us to not meet the definition of an “investment company” and avoid regulation under the Investment Company Act, we must engage primarily in the business of buying real estate, and these investments must be made within one year after our offering period ends. If we are unable to invest a significant portion of the proceeds of our initial offering in properties within one year after our offering period, we may avoid being required to register as an investment company by temporarily investing any unused proceeds in certificates of deposit or other cash items with low returns. This would reduce the cash available for distribution to investors and possibly lower our stockholders’ returns.
To avoid meeting the definition of an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. Similarly, we may have to acquire additional income- or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forgo opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy. Accordingly, our board may not be able to change our investment policies as our board may deem appropriate if such change would cause us to meet the definition of an “investment company.” In addition, a change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect our ability to avoid being required to register as an investment company. If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court were to require enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.
As part of our advisor’s obligations under the Advisory Agreement, our advisor agrees to refrain from taking any action which, in its sole judgment made in good faith, would subject us to regulation under the Investment Company Act. Failure to maintain an exclusion from registration under the Investment Company Act would require us to significantly restructure our business plan. For example, because affiliate transactions generally are prohibited under the Investment Company Act, we would not be able to enter into transactions with any of our affiliates if we are required to register as an investment company, and we may be required to terminate the Advisory Agreement and any other agreements with affiliates, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business and pay distributions.
Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate
Changes in national, international, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions, including a rise in interest rates, may adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders or reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment.
We are subject to risks generally incidental to the ownership of real estate, including changes in national, international, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions. We are unable to predict future changes in national, international, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions. For example, a recession or rise in interest rates could make it more difficult for us to lease real properties or dispose of them. In addition, rising interest rates could also make alternative interest-bearing and other investments more attractive, and therefore, potentially lower the relative value of our existing real estate investments. These conditions, or others we cannot predict, may adversely affect our results of operations, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders or reduce the value of our stockholders’ investment.
If we acquire real estate at a time when the real estate market is experiencing substantial influxes of capital investment and competition for income-producing properties, such real estate investments may not appreciate or may decrease in value.
The real estate market may experience a substantial influx of capital from investors. Any substantial flow of capital, combined with significant competition for income producing real estate, may result in inflated purchase prices for such assets. To the extent we purchase real estate in such an environment in the future, we will be subject to the risk that the value of such investments may not appreciate or may decrease significantly below the amount we paid for such investment.
A significant portion of our annual base rent may be concentrated in a small number of tenants. Therefore, non-renewals, terminations or lease defaults by any of these significant tenants could reduce our net income and have a negative effect on our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
The success of our investments materially depends upon the financial stability of the tenants leasing the properties we own. Therefore, a non-renewal after the expiration of a lease term, termination, default or other failure to meet rental obligations by a significant tenant would significantly lower our net income. Any of these events could have a negative effect on our results of operations, our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders or on our ability to cover distributions with cash
flows from operations. As of March 21, 201926, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, no single tenant accounted for more than 10.0% of our annualized base rent or annualized NOI of our total property portfolio.
We may obtain only limited warranties when we purchase a property and would have only limited recourse in the event our due diligence did not identify any issues that lower the value of our property.
The seller of a property often sells such property in its “as is” condition on a “where is” basis and “with all faults,” without any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use or purpose. In addition, purchase and sale agreements may contain only limited warranties, representations and indemnifications that will only survive for a limited period after the closing. The purchase of properties with limited warranties increases the risk that we may lose some or all of our invested capital in the property, as well as the loss of rental income from that property.
Uninsured losses relating to real estate and lender requirements to obtain insurance may reduce our stockholders’ returns.
There are types of losses relating to real estate, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters, for which we do not intend to obtain insurance unless we are required to do so by mortgage lenders. If any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, other than any reserves we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property, and we cannot assure our stockholders that any such sources of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for uninsured losses, we could suffer reduced earnings that would result in less cash to be distributed to our stockholders. In cases where we are required by mortgage lenders to obtain casualty loss insurance for catastrophic events or terrorism, such insurance may not be available, or may not be available at a reasonable cost, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our properties. Additionally, if we obtain such insurance, the costs associated with owning a property would increase and could have a material adverse effect on the net income from the property, and, thus, the cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Terrorist attacks, and other acts of violence or war or public health crises may affect the markets in which we operate and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Terrorist attacks, acts of war and public health crises (including the recent coronavirus outbreak) may negatively affect our operations and our stockholders’ investments. We may acquire real estate assets located in areas that are susceptible to attack.terrorist attacks, acts of war, or a public health crisis. These attacksevents may directly impact the value of our assets through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs. Although we may obtain terrorism insurance, we may not be able to obtain sufficient coverage to fund any losses we may incur. Risks associated with potential acts of terrorism could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Further, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable or not insurable at reasonable costs.
More generally, any terrorist attack, other act of violence or war, including armed conflicts,or public health crisis (such as the coronavirus outbreak) could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy, all of which could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to pay rent on their leases or our ability to borrow money or issue capital stock at acceptable prices, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Dramatic increases in insurance rates could adversely affect our cash flows and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
We may not be able to obtain insurance coverage at reasonable rates due to high premium and/or deductible amounts. As a result, our cash flows could be adversely impacted due to these higher costs, which would adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Delays in the acquisition, development and construction of real properties may have adverse effects on our results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and development of real properties could adversely affect our stockholders’ returns. Where properties are acquired prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it will typically take several months to complete construction and rent available space. If we engage in development or construction projects, we will be subject to uncertainties associated with re-zoning for development, environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups, and our builder’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs and timetables. If a builder fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance. A builder’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder’s control. Therefore, our stockholders could suffer delays in the receipt of cash distributions attributable to those particular real properties. Delays in completion of construction could give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases
for space at a newly developed project. We may incur additional risks if we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders prior to completion of construction. These and other such factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and our return on our investment could suffer.
We are permitted to invest in a limited amount of unimproved real property. Returns from development of unimproved properties are also subject to risks associated with re-zoning the land for development and environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups. If we invest in unimproved real property that we intend to develop, our stockholders’ investment would be subject to the risks associated with investments in unimproved real property.
If we contract with a development company for newly developed property, our earnest money deposit made to the development company may not be fully refunded.
We may acquire one or more properties under development. We anticipate that if we do acquire properties that are under development, we will be obligated to pay a substantial earnest money deposit at the time of contracting to acquire such properties, and that we will be required to close the purchase of the property upon completion of the development of the property. We may enter into such a contract with the development company even if at the time we enter into the contract, we have not yet secured sufficient financing to enable us to close the purchase of such property. However, we may not be required to close a purchase from the development company, and may be entitled to a refund of our earnest money, in the following circumstances:
the development company fails to develop the property;
all or a specified portion of the pre-leased tenants fail to take possession under their leases for any reason; or
we are unable to secure sufficient financing to pay the purchase price at closing.
The obligation of the development company to refund our earnest money deposit will be unsecured, and we may not be able to obtain a refund of such earnest money deposit from it under these circumstances since the development company may be an entity without substantial assets or operations.
Uncertain market conditions relating to the future disposition of properties could cause us to sell our properties at a loss in the future.
Our advisor, subject to the oversight and approval of our board, may exercise its discretion as to whether and when to sell a property, and we will have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time. We cannot predict with any certainty the various market conditions affecting real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. Because of the uncertainty of market conditions that may affect the future disposition of our properties, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to sell our properties at a profit in the future. Additionally, we may incur prepayment penalties in the event we sell a property subject to a mortgage earlier than we otherwise had planned. Accordingly, the extent to which our stockholders will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will, among other things, be dependent upon fluctuating market conditions.
Our inability to sell a property when we desire to do so could adversely impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates, supply and demand, and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We may not have adequate funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements. Moreover, in acquiring a property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property. Our inability to sell a property when we desire to do so may cause us to reduce our selling price for the property. Any delay in our receipt of proceeds, or diminishment of proceeds, from the sale of a property could adversely impact our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
IfOur stockholders may not receive any profits resulting from the sale of our properties, or receive such profits in a timely manner, because we sell properties by providingmay provide financing to purchasers, defaults by the purchasers would adversely affect our cash flows from operations.purchaser of such property.
If we decide to sell anyone of our properties in some instancesa forced or voluntary liquidation, we may sell our properties either subject to or upon the assumption of any then outstanding mortgage debt or, alternatively, may provide financing to purchasers. We may take a purchase money obligation secured by a mortgage as partial payment. We do not have any limitations or restrictions on our taking such purchase money obligations. When we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default on its obligations under the financing, which could negatively impact cash flows from operations. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of sale proceeds, or their reinvestment in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon the sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of. In some cases, we may receive initial down payments in cash and other property in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price, and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. IfTherefore, our stockholders may experience a delay in the distribution to our stockholders of the proceeds of a sale until such time. Additionally, if any purchaser defaults under a financing arrangement with us, it could negatively impact our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
Our stockholders may not receive any profits resulting from the sale of one of our properties, or receive such profits in a timely manner, because we may provide financing to the purchaser of such property.
If we sell one of our properties during liquidation, our stockholders may experience a delay before receiving their share of the proceeds of such liquidation. In a forced or voluntary liquidation, we may sell our properties either subject to or upon the assumption of any then outstanding mortgage debt or, alternatively, may provide financing to purchasers. We may take a purchase money obligation secured by a mortgage as partial payment. We do not have any limitations or restrictions on our taking such purchase money obligations. To the extent we receive promissory notes or other property instead of cash from sales, such proceeds, other than any interest payable on those proceeds, will not be included in net sale proceeds until and to the extent the promissory notes or other property are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of. In many cases, we will receive initial down payments in the year of sale in an amount less than the selling price and subsequent payments will be spread over a number of years. Therefore, our stockholders may experience a delay in the distribution to them of the proceeds of a sale until such time.
Representations and warranties made by us in connection with sales of our properties may subject us to liability that could result in losses and could harm our operating results and, therefore distributions we make to our stockholders.
When we sell a property, we may be required to make representations and warranties regarding the property and other customary items. In the event of a breach of such representations or warranties, the purchaser of the property may have claims for damages against us, rights to indemnification from us or otherwise have remedies against us. In any such case, we may incur liabilities that could result in losses and could harm our operating results and, therefore distributions we make to our stockholders.
Characterization of our sale-leaseback transactions may be challenged.
We have and may continue to purchase real estate investments and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. Our advisor will use its best efforts to structure any of our sale-leaseback transactions such that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease” and so that we will be treated as the owner of the property for federal income tax purposes. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, will not challenge such characterization. In the event that any such sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized as a financing transaction for federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such real estate investment would be disallowed or significantly reduced.
We face possible liability for environmental cleanup costs and damages for contamination related to properties we acquire, which could substantially increase our costs and reduce our liquidity and cash distributions to our stockholders.
Because we own and operate real estate, we are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations. Under these laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including the release of asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real estate for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances. In addition, new or more stringent laws or stricter interpretations of existing laws could change the cost of compliance or liabilities and restrictions arising out of such laws. The cost of defending against these claims, complying with environmental regulatory requirements, conducting remediation of any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims could be substantial, which would reduce our liquidity and cash available for distribution to our stockholders. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances on a property or the failure to meet
environmental regulatory requirements may materially impair our ability to use, lease or sell a property, or to use the property as collateral for borrowing.
Our real estate investments may be concentrated in medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, integrated senior health campuses or other healthcare-related facilities, making us potentially more vulnerable economically than if our investments were diversified.
As a REIT, we invest primarily in real estate. Within the real estate industry, we have acquired and may acquire or selectively develop and own medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, integrated senior health campuses and other healthcare-related facilities. We are subject to risks inherent in concentrating investments in real estate. These risks resulting from a lack of diversification become even greater as a result of our business strategy to invest to a substantial degree in healthcare-related facilities.
A downturn in the commercial real estate industry generally could significantly adversely affect the value of our properties. A downturn in the healthcare industry could negatively affect our lessees’ ability to make lease payments to us and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. These adverse effects could be more pronounced than if we diversified our investments outside of real estate or if our portfolio did not include a substantial concentration in medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities.
A high concentration of our properties in a particular geographic area would magnify the effects of downturns in that geographic area.
To the extent that weWe have a concentration of properties in any particular geographic area,areas; therefore, any adverse situation that disproportionately effects that geographic areaone of those areas would have a magnified adverse effect on our portfolio. As of March 21, 2019,26, 2020, properties located in Indiana and Ohio accounted for approximately 34.4%36.8% and 10.6%, respectively, of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized NOI.net operating income. Accordingly, there is a geographic concentration of risk subject to fluctuations in such state’s economy.
The decision of the United Kingdom to exit the European Union could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The decision made in the British referendum of June 23, 2016 to leave the European Union, and the official withdrawal on January 31, 2020, commonly referred to as “Brexit,” has led to volatility in the financial markets of the United Kingdom, or UK, and more broadly across Europe and may also lead to weakening in consumer, corporate and financial confidence in such markets. The formal notification to the European Council required under Article 50 of the Treaty on the European Union was made on March 29, 2017, triggering a two-year period during which the terms of exit are to be negotiated. The longer term economic, legal, political and social framework to be put in place between the UK and the European Union is unclear at this stage and is likely to lead to ongoing political and economic uncertainty and periods of exacerbated volatility in both the UK and in wider European markets for some time. In particular, Brexit caused significant volatility in global stock markets and currency exchange fluctuations.
As described elsewhere in this report, we translate revenue and expenses denominated in the Great Britain pound into U.S.United States dollars, or USD, for our financial statements. Consequently, our assets and liabilities denominated in Great Britain pounds may be subject to increased risks related to these currency rate fluctuations, and during periods of a strengthening U.S. dollar,USD, our reported operating results in the UK are reduced because the Great Britain pound translates into fewer U.S. dollars.USD. Currency volatility may mean that our assets and liabilities are adversely affected by market movements and may make it more difficult, or more expensive, for us to execute appropriate currency hedging policies. In addition, Brexit may also adversely affect commercial real estate fundamentals in the UK and European Union, including greater uncertainty for leasing prospects, which could negatively impact the ability of our UK and European Union-based borrowers to satisfy their debt payment obligations to us, increasing default risk and/or making it more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for our operations in the UK and Europe.
Under the process for leavingThe UK’s withdrawal from the European Union, contemplated in article 50 ofeffective January 31, 2020, commences an 11-month transitional period during which the Treaty onUK will continue to be subject to European Union rules while establishing relationship guidelines and agreements with the European Union countries for the UK will remain a member state until a withdrawal agreement is entered into or, failing that, March 29, 2019.period after the transitional period ends on December 31, 2020. The long-term effects of Brexit are expected to depend on, among other things, any agreements the UK makes to retain access to European Union markets either during athe transitional period or more permanently. Brexit could adversely affect European or worldwide economic or market conditions and could contribute to instability in global financial and real estate markets. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the UK determines which European Union laws to replace or replicate. Until the terms and timing of the UK’s exit from the European Union become clearer, it is not possible to determine the impact that the exit and/or any related matters may have on us. The decision of the UK could also have a destabilizing effect if other European Union member states were to consider the option of leaving the European Union. For these reasons, the decision of the UK to leave the European Union could have adverse consequences on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had $68,085,000 invested in the UK, or 2.3% of our portfolio, based on our aggregate contract purchase price of real estate investments.
Certain of our properties may not have efficient alternative uses, so the loss of a tenant may cause us not to be able to find a replacement or cause us to spend considerable capital to adapt the property to an alternative use.
Some of the properties we have acquired and will seek to acquire are healthcare properties that may only be suitable for similar healthcare-related tenants. If we or our tenants terminate the leases for these properties or our tenants lose their regulatory authority to operate such properties, we may not be able to locate suitable replacement tenants to lease the properties for their specialized uses. Alternatively, we may be required to spend substantial amounts to adapt the properties to other uses. Any loss of revenues or additional capital expenditures required as a result may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Our current and future medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, integrated senior health campuses and other healthcare-related facilities and tenants may be unable to compete successfully, which could result in lower rent payments, reduce our cash flows from operations and amount available for distributions.
Our current and future medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, integrated senior health campuses and other healthcare-related facilities often will face competition from nearby medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, integrated senior health campuses and other healthcare-related facilities that
provide comparable services. Some of those competing facilities are owned by governmental agencies and supported by tax revenues, and others are owned by nonprofit corporations and may be supported to a large extent by endowments and charitable contributions. These types of support are not available to our buildings.
Similarly, our tenants face competition from other medical practices in nearby hospitals and other medical facilities. Our tenants’ failure to compete successfully with these other practices could adversely affect their ability to make rental payments, which could adversely affect our rental revenues. Further, from time to time and for reasons beyond our control, referral sources, including physicians and managed care organizations, may change their lists of hospitals or physicians to which they refer patients.patients or that are permitted to participate in the payor program. This could adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make rental payments, which could adversely affect our rental revenues.
Any reduction in rental revenues resulting from the inability of our medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities and our tenants to compete successfully may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
The change in accounting standards in the United States for leases could reduce the overall demand to lease our properties.
Prior to January 1, 2019, the existing accounting standards for leases required lessees to classify their leases as either capital or operating leases. Under a capital lease, both the leased asset, which represented the tenant’s right to use the property, and the contractual lease obligation were recorded on the tenant’s balance sheet if one of the following criteria are met: (i) the lease transferred ownership of the property to the lessee by the end of the lease term; (ii) the lease contained a bargain purchase option; (iii) the non-cancelable lease term was more than 75.0% of the useful life of the asset; or (iv) if the present value of the minimum lease payments equaled 90.0% or more of the leased property’s fair value. If the terms of the lease did not meet these criteria, the lease was considered an operating lease, and no leased asset or contractual lease obligation was recorded by the tenant.
In order to address concerns raised by the SEC regarding the transparency of contractual lease obligations under the existing accounting standards for operating leases, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2016-02, Leases, or ASU 2016-02, in February 2016, which substantially changed the current lease accounting standards, primarily by eliminating the concept of operating lease accounting. As a result, a lease asset and obligation is recorded on the tenant’s balance sheet for all lease arrangements. In addition, ASU 2016-02 and its amendments impact the method in which contractual lease payments are recorded. In order to mitigate the effect of the lease accounting, tenants may seek to negotiate certain terms within new lease arrangements or modify terms in existing lease arrangements, such as shorter lease terms or fewer extension options, which would generally have less impact on tenant balance sheets. Also, tenants may reassess their lease-versus-buy strategies. This could result in a greater renewal risk or shorter lease terms, which may negatively impact our operations and ability to pay distributions. On January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU 2016-02 and its amendments. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements,Leases and Note 17, Leases, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.
Our costs associated with complying with the ADA may reduce our cash available for distributions.
The properties we will acquire may be subject to the ADA. Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be
made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The ADA’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. We will attempt to acquire properties that comply with the ADA or place the burden on the seller or other third party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with the ADA. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. If we cannot, our funds used for ADA compliance may reduce cash available for distributions and the amount of distributions to our stockholders.
Increased operating expenses could reduce cash flows from operations and funds available to acquire investments or pay distributions.
Any property that we have acquired or may acquire will be subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us. If any property is not fully occupied or if rents are being paid in an amount that is insufficient to cover operating expenses, we could be required to expend funds with respect to that property for operating expenses. The properties will be subject to increases in tax rates, utility costs, insurance costs, repairs and maintenance costs, administrative costs and other operating expenses. Some of our property leases or future leases may not require the tenants to pay all or a portion of these expenses, in which event we may have to pay these costs. If we are unable to lease properties on terms that require the tenants to pay all or some of the properties’ operating expenses, if our tenants fail to pay these expenses as required or if expenses we are required to pay exceed our expectations, we could have less funds available for future acquisitions or cash available for distributions to our stockholders.
Our operating properties are subject to real and personal property taxes that may increase in the future, which could adversely affect our cash flows.
Our operating properties are subject to real and personal property taxes that may increase as tax rates change and as the operating properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. As the owner of the properties, we are ultimately responsible for payment of the taxes to the applicable government authorities. If real property taxes increase, our tenants may be unable to make the required tax payments, ultimately requiring us to pay the taxes even if otherwise stated under the terms of the lease. If we fail to pay any such taxes, the applicable taxing authority may place a lien on the operating property and the operating property may be subject to a tax sale. In addition, we are generally responsible for real property taxes related to any vacant space.
Acquiring or attempting to acquire multiple properties in a single transaction may adversely affect our operations.
From time to time, we have acquired and may continue to attempt to acquire multiple properties in a single transaction. Portfolio acquisitions are more complex and expensive than single-property acquisitions, and the risk that a multi-property acquisition does not close may be greater than in a single-property acquisition. Portfolio acquisitions may also result in us owning investments in geographically dispersed markets, placing additional demands on our ability to manage the properties in the portfolio. In addition, a seller may require that a group of properties be purchased as a package even though we may not want to purchase one or more properties in the portfolio. In these situations, if we are unable to identify another person or entity to acquire the unwanted properties, we may be required to operate or attempt to dispose of these properties. To acquire multiple properties in a single transaction, we may be required to accumulate a large amount of cash. We would expect the returns that we earn on such cash to be less than the ultimate returns on real property; therefore, accumulating such cash could reduce our funds available for distributions to our stockholders. Any of the foregoing events may have an adverse effect on our operations.
Costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations related to environmental protection and human health and safety may be high.
All real property investments and the operations conducted in connection with such investments are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on customers, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on such real property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate those substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge such real property as collateral for future borrowings. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which real property may be used or businesses may be operated. Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, our tenants’ operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our real properties, such as the
presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our real properties. In addition, there are various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply, and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our real properties, we may be exposed to such costs in connection with such regulations. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of any damages or fines we must pay, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated real property could materially and adversely affect our business, lower the value of our assets or results of operations and, consequently, lower the amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.
Ownership of property outside the United States may subject us to different or greater risks than those associated with our domestic operations.
We have operations in the Isle of Man and the UK. International development, ownership, and operating activities involve risks that are different from those we face with respect to our domestic properties and operations. These risks include, but are not limited to, any international currency gain recognized with respect to changes in exchange rates may not qualify under the 75.0% gross income test or the 95.0% gross income test that we must satisfy annually in order to maintain our status as a REIT; challenges with respect to the repatriation of foreign earnings and cash; changes in foreign political, regulatory, and economic conditions, including regionally, nationally, and locally; challenges in managing international operations; challenges
of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to real estate, corporate governance, operations, taxes, employment and legal proceedings; foreign ownership restrictions with respect to operations in countries; diminished ability to legally enforce our contractual rights in foreign countries; differences in lending practices and the willingness of domestic or foreign lenders to provide financing; regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability; and changes in applicable laws and regulations in the United States that affect foreign operations. In addition, we have limited investing experience in international markets. If we are unable to successfully manage the risks associated with international expansion and operations, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Investments in properties or other real estate-related investments outside the United States would subject us to foreign currency risks, which may adversely affect distributions and our REIT status.
We generate a portion of our revenue in foreign currencies such as the UK Pound Sterling. Revenues generated from any properties or other real estate-related investments we acquire or ventures we enter into relating to transactions involving assets located in markets outside the United States likely will be denominated in the local currency. Therefore, any investments we make outside the United States may subject us to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the United States Dollar.USD. As a result, changes in exchange rates of any such foreign currency to United States DollarsUSD may affect our revenues, operating margins and distributions and may also affect the book value of our assets and the amount of stockholders’ equity.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates used to value a REIT’s foreign assets may be considered changes in the value of the REIT’s assets. These changes may adversely affect our status as a REIT. Further, bank accounts in a foreign currency which are not considered cash or cash equivalents may adversely affect our status as a REIT.
Risks Related to the Healthcare Industry
The healthcare industry is heavily regulated and new laws or regulations, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure or failure to obtain licensure could result in the inability of our tenants to make rent payments to us.
The healthcare industry is heavily regulated by federal, state and local governmental bodies. The tenants in our healthcare properties generally will be subject to laws and regulations covering, among other things, licensure, certification for participation in government programs, and relationships with physicians and other referral sources. Changes in these laws and regulations or our tenants’ failure to comply with these laws and regulations could negatively affect the ability of our tenants to make lease payments to us and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Many of our healthcare properties and their tenants may require a license or certificate of need, or CON, to operate. Failure to obtain a license or CON, or loss of a required license or CON, would prevent a facility from operating in the manner intended by the tenant. These events could materially adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make rent payments to us. State and local laws also may regulate expansion, including the addition of new beds or services or acquisition of medical equipment, and the construction of healthcare-related facilities, by requiring a CON or other similar approval. State CON laws and other similar laws are not uniform throughout the United States and are subject to change; therefore, this may adversely impact our tenants’ ability to provide services in different states. We cannot predict the impact of state CON laws or similar laws on our development of facilities or the operations of our tenants.
In addition, state CON laws often materially impact the ability of competitors to enter into the marketplace of our facilities. The repeal of CON laws could allow competitors to freely operate in previously closed markets. This could negatively affect our tenants’ abilities to make rent payments to us.
In limited circumstances, loss of state licensure or certification or closure of a facility could ultimately result in loss of authority to operate the facility or provide services at the facility and require new CON authorization licensure and/or authorization or potential authorization from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to re-institute operations. As a result, a portion of the value of the facility may be reduced, which would adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Reductions in reimbursement from third-party payors, including Medicare and Medicaid, could adversely affect the profitability of our tenants and hinder their ability to make rental payments to us, and comprehensive healthcare reform legislation could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Sources of revenue for our tenants may include the federal Medicare program, state Medicaid programs, private insurance carriers and health maintenance organizations, among others. Efforts by such payors to reduce healthcare costs will likely continue, which may result in reductions or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our tenants. In addition, the healthcare billing rules and regulations are complex, and the failure of any of our tenants to comply
with various laws and regulations could jeopardize their ability to continue participating in Medicare, Medicaid and other government sponsored payment programs. Moreover, the state and federal governmental healthcare programs are subject to reductions by state and federal legislative actions. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 prevented the reduction in physician reimbursement of Medicare from being implemented in 2013. The Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 prevented the reduction of 24.4% in the physician fee schedule by replacing the scheduled reduction with a 0.5% increase to the physician fee schedule through December 31, 2014, and no increase from January 1, 2015 through March 31, 2015. The potential 21.0% cut in reimbursement that was to be effective April 1, 2015 was removed by the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, or MACRA, and replaced with two new methodologies that will focus upon payment based upon quality outcomes. The first model is the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, or MIPS, which combines the Physician Quality Reporting System, or PQRS, and Meaningful Use program with the Value Based Modifier program to provide for one payment model based upon (i) quality, (ii) resource use, (iii) clinical practice improvement and (iv) advancing care information through the use of certified Electronic Health Record, or EHR, technology. The second model is the Advanced Alternative Payment Models, or APM, which requires the physician to participate in a risk share arrangement for reimbursement related to his or her patients while utilizing a certified health record and reporting on specific quality metrics. There are a number of physicians that will not qualify for the APM payment method. method. Therefore, this change in reimbursement models may impact our tenants’ payments and create uncertainty in the tenants’ financial condition.
In 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, announced the CMS Primary Cares Initiative, a new set of payment models for primary care physicians. CMS stated that the goal of some of these models is to reduce hospital utilization and the total cost of patient care. These new models may have an effect on the financial condition of our tenants.
CMS has also implemented a value-based program specific to skilled nursing facilities. Under the SNF VBP Program, CMS withholds 2% of fee-for-service payments. The withheld amount is redistributed based upon certain performance measures. The withholding of payments may affect the financial condition and ability to pay of our skilled nursing facility tenants.
The healthcare industry continues to face various challenges, including increased government and private payor pressure on healthcare providers to control or reduce costs. It is possible that our tenants will continue to experience a shift in payor mix away from fee-for-service payors, resulting in an increase in the percentage of revenues attributable to reimbursement based upon value basedvalue-based principles and quality driven managed care programs, and general industry trends that include pressures to control healthcare costs. The federal government’sgovernment's goal is to move approximately 90.0% of its reimbursement for providers to be based upon quality outcome models. Pressures to control healthcare costs and a shift away from traditional health insurance reimbursement based upon a fee for service payment to payment based upon quality outcomes have increased the uncertainty of payments.
In addition, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, or the Healthcare Reform Act, is intended to reduce the number of individuals in the U.S.United States without health insurance and effect significant other changes to the ways in which healthcare is organized, delivered and reimbursed. Included within the legislation is a limitation on physician-owned hospitals from expanding, unless the facility satisfies very narrow federal exceptions to this limitation. Therefore, if our tenants are physicians that own and refer to a hospital, the hospital would be limited in its operations and expansion potential, which may limit the hospital’s services and resulting revenues and may impact the owner’s ability to make rental payments.
Furthermore, the healthcare legislation passed in 2010 included new payment models with new shared savings programs and demonstration programs that include bundled payment models and payments contingent upon reporting on satisfaction of quality benchmarks. The new payment models will likely change how physicians are paid for services. These changes could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of some of our tenants. Also, on December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was signed into law and repeals the individual mandate portion of the Healthcare Reform Act beginning in 2019. Therefore,With the elimination of the individual mandate, several states brought suit seeking to invalidate the entire Affordable Care Act, and, in December 2018, a federal district court in Texas ruled in favor of these states, finding the entire Affordable Care Act unconstitutional. The district court’s ruling was appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which agreed that the individual mandate is unconstitutional and sent the case back to the district court for further analysis and consideration. Certain states have filed petitions requesting that the United States Supreme Court review the Fifth Circuit’s decision. If the entire Affordable Care Act, including the individual mandate, is eventually ruled unconstitutional, our tenants may have more patients thatwho do not have insurance coverage, which may adversely impact the tenants’ collections and revenues. The financial impact on our tenants could restrict their ability to make rent payments to us, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to stockholders.
Furthermore, beginning in 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, has applied a negative payment adjustment to individual eligible professionals, Comprehensive Primary Care practice sites, and group practices participating in the PQRS group practice reporting option (including Accountable Care Organizations) that do not satisfactorily report PQRS in 2014. Program participation during a calendar year will affect payments two years after the reporting cycle, such that individuals and groups that do not satisfy the PQRS reporting metrics in 2016 will be impacted by a two percent negative payment adjustment in 2018. Providers can appeal the determination, but if the provider is not successful, the provider’s reimbursement may be adversely impacted, which could adversely impact a tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us. CMS is transitioning from PQRS to other quality payment methods.
ForIn 2019, CMS implemented changes to its outpatient prospective payment system, or OPPS, which will resultresulted in reduced reimbursement for certain outpatient services furnished by “provider-based” clinicians. The OPPS payment reductions are intended to equalize amounts that the government pays for similar clinical services, regardless of the clinical setting in which they are provided. Healthcare providers and certain provider organizations, including the American Hospital Association, have filed
challenged these payment reductions in a lawsuit allegingfiled in federal court. A federal judge ruled that the government’s payment reductions are ill-advisedfor the 2019 OPPS were illegal, a decision which the government has appealed. Despite the court ruling with respect to the 2019 OPPS, CMS continued its reduced payment policy in the 2020 OPPS, a move that the American Hospital Association and unlawful. Additionally, for 2019, CMS reducedother health care organizations have once again challenged. If the add-on amount that providers may charge for certain medications covered by Medicare Part B from 6%government ultimately prevails with respect to 3%. Thesethe OPPS payment reductions, the payments adjustments may impact the amount of reimbursement our tenants receive for the medical services they provide.
In 2014, state insurance exchanges were implemented, which provide a new mechanism for individuals to obtain insurance. At this time, the number of payors that are participating in the state insurance exchanges varies, and in some regions there are very limited insurance plans available for individuals to choose from when purchasing insurance. In addition, not all healthcare providers will maintain participation agreements with the payors that are participating in the state health insurance exchange. Therefore, it is possible that our tenants may incur a change in their reimbursement if the tenant does not have a participation agreement with the state insurance exchange payors and a large number of individuals elect to purchase insurance from the state insurance exchange. Further, the rates of reimbursement from the state insurance exchange payors to healthcare providers will vary greatly. The rates of reimbursement will be subject to negotiation between the healthcare provider and the payor, which may vary based upon the market, the healthcare provider’s quality metrics, the number of providers participating in the area and the patient population, among other factors. Therefore, it is uncertain whether healthcare providers will incur a decrease in reimbursement from the state insurance exchange, which may impact a tenant’s ability to pay rent.
The insurance plans that participated on the health insurance exchanges created by the Healthcare Reform Act were expecting to receive risk corridor payments to address the high risk claims that they paid through the exchange product. However, theThe federal government currently owes the insurance companies approximately $12.3 billion under the risk corridor payment program that is currently disputed by the federal government. In addition,Multiple lawsuits have been brought by qualified health plans, or QHPs, to recover the prior risk corridor payments that were anticipated to be paid as part of the health insurance exchange program included risk adjustment payments that allocated payments to insurers that had the most complex patients. Effective July 7,program. In June 2018, the federal government suspended $10.4 billion of the risk adjustment payments based upon a court order that the payment methodology was flawed. However, on July 24, 2018, the federal government reissued a previous rule regarding risk adjustment payments, including as part of the reissuance additional explanation regarding the methodology used in determining risk adjustment payments. As part of the reissuance, the federal government resumed its operation of the risk adjustment program. In 2018, the federal government won a lawsuit regarding risk corridor payments, with a federal appellate court finding that the government was not obligated to make the payments. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which renderedissued an opinion in Moda Health Plan v. United States, concluding that the 2018 ruling, subsequently refusedgovernment does not have to pay health insurers that offered QHPs the insurance companies’ requestfull amount owed to rehear the litigationthem in front of a full judge panel.risk corridors payments. Several insurers sought review of the insurers involveddecision by the United States Supreme Court, and the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the matter in the litigation are seeking an appeal in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. Despite reversing its suspension of risk adjustment payments, the federal government is subject to pending litigation regarding the risk adjustment payments, including the government’s appeal of a federal judge’s ruling that the government’s formula for calculating risk adjustment payments is arbitrary and capricious.December 2019. If the United States Supreme Court determines that risk corridor payments are not required to be paid to the QHPs offering insurance companies do not receive payments,coverage on the health insurance exchange program, the insurance companies may also cease offering the Health Insurance Exchange product to the current beneficiaries and may refuse to participate onin future collaborations with the federal government that would increase the number of patients with insurance exchange, which limits insurance options for patients. Ifcoverage. Therefore, our tenants may have an increase of self-pay patients do not have access to insurance coverage, itand collections may decline, adversely impact the tenants’ revenues andimpacting the tenants’ ability to pay rent.
The federal government also ceased to provide the cost-share subsidies to the insurance companies that offered the silver plan benefits on the Health Information Exchange. The termination of the cost-share subsidies would impact the subsidy payments due in 2017 and will likely adversely impact the insurance companies, causing an increase in the premium payments for the individual beneficiaries in 2018. Nineteen State Attorneys General filed suit to force the Trump Administration to reinstate the cost share subsidy payments. On October 25, 2017, a California Judge ruled in favor of the Trump Administration and found that the federal government was not required to immediately reinstate payment for the cost shares subsidy. The injunction sought by the Attorneys’ General lawsuit was denied. Subsequently, several insurers filed suit in the U.S.United States Court of Federal Claims to recover cost-share reduction payments, and in several of the matters, the Court of Federal Claims ruled in favor of the insurers. Nevertheless, because of the government’s refusal to make cost-share reduction payments, our tenants will likely see an increase in individuals who are self-pay or have a lower health benefit plan due to the increase in the premium payments. Our tenants’ collections and revenues may be adversely impacted by the change in the payor mix of their patients and it may adversely impact the tenants’ ability to make rent payments.
Multiple lawsuits have been brought by qualified health plans, or QHPs, to recover the prior risk corridor payments that were anticipated to be paid as part of the health insurance exchange program. In June 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in Moda Health Plan v. United States, concluding that the government does not have to pay health insurers that offered QHPs the full amount owed to them in risk corridors payments. In November of 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit refused Moda’s request for an en banc review in front of a full judge panel. Several insurers have sought review of the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. At this time, at least two key cases have been determined in favor of the government withholding payment of the risk corridor payment. If the court system decisions that risk corridor payments are not required to be paid to the QHPs offering insurance coverage on the health insurance exchange program remain in effect and binding, the insurance companies may cease offering the Health Insurance Exchange product to the current beneficiaries. Therefore, our tenants may have an increase of self-pay patients and collections may decline, adversely impacting the tenants’ ability to pay rent.
In 2017, Congressional activities to attempt to repeal the Healthcare Reform Act failed. However, President Trump signed several Executive Orders that address different aspects of the Healthcare Reform Act. First, on January 20, 2017 an Executive Order was signed to “ease the burden of Obamacare.” Furthermore, on October 12, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order the purpose of which was to, among other things, (i) cut healthcare cost-sharing reduction subsidies, (ii) allow more small businesses to join together to purchase insurance coverage, (iii) extend short-term coverage policies, and (iv) expand employers’ ability to provide workers cash to buy coverage elsewhere. The Executive Order required the government agencies to draft regulations for consideration related to Associated Health Plans (AHP), short term limited duration insurance (STLDI) and health reimbursement arrangements (HRA). Some, but not all, of the required regulations have been drafted. Several states have brought a lawsuit challenging regulations that were implemented pursuant to the Executive Order. If the Healthcare Reform Act is modified through Executive Orders, the healthcare industry will continue to change and new regulations may further modify payment models, jeopardizing our tenants’ ability to remit the rental payments.
On January 11, 2018, CMS issued guidance to support state efforts to improve Medicaid enrollee health outcomes by incentivizing community engagement among able-bodied, working-age Medicaid beneficiaries. The policy excludes individuals eligible for Medicaid due to a disability, elderly beneficiaries, children and pregnant women. Thus far, CMS has received proposals from several states seeking requirements for able bodied Medicaid beneficiaries to engage in employment and community engagement initiatives. Kentucky, Indiana, Arkansas, New Hampshire, Arizona, Michigan, Ohio, Utah, South Carolina and Wisconsin have been granted a waiverwaivers for their programs andthat require Medicaid beneficiaries to work or get ready for employment, and work requirement waiver requests from other states are currently pending before CMS. However, in June 2018, the Federal District Court in the Districtstates of ColumbiaKentucky, Arkansas and New Hampshire have had their approvals vacated the CMS approval of the Kentucky waiver, finding the approval was arbitrary and capricious and the Court referred it back to CMS.by courts. In response to CMS’s willingness to entertain Medicaid program waivers, states are seeking waivers to impose other Medicaid eligibility requirements, such as drug testing and eligibility time limits. If the “work requirement” and other eligibility requirements expand to the states’ Medicaid programs, it may decrease the number of patients eligible for Medicaid. The patients that are no longer eligible for Medicaid may become self-pay patients, which may adversely impact our tenant’s ability to receive reimbursement. If our tenants’ patient payor mix becomes more self-pay patients, it may impact our tenants’ ability to collect revenues and pay rent. In addition, beginning
Beginning in 2018, CMS cut funding to the 340B Program, which is intended to lower drug costs for certain healthcare providers. A federal court ruled the cuts to the 340B Program reimbursement were unlawful and ordered CMS to develop remedial measures to address the reimbursement cuts. Despite this ruling, CMS finalized plans to implement cuts to 340B Program reimbursement again in 2020. The cuts in the 340B Program may result in some of our tenants having less money available to cover operational costs.
In February of 2018, Congress passed the Bipartisan Balanced Budget Act of 2018. Some of the most notable provisions of the Bipartisan Balanced Budget Act include: (i) the permanent extension of Medicare Special Needs Plans, or SNPs, which provide tailored care for certain qualifying Medicare beneficiaries; (ii) guaranteed funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, through 2027; (iii) expansion of Medicare coverage for tele-medicine services; and (iv) expanded testing of certain value-based care models. The extension of SNPs and funding for CHIP secure coverage for patients of our tenants and may reduce the number of uninsured patients treated by our tenants. The expansion of coverage for tele-medicine services
could impact the demand for medical properties. If more patients can be treated remotely, providers may have less demand for real property.
The current trend for seniors to delay moving to senior housing facilities until they require greater care or to forgo moving to senior housing facilities altogether could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Seniors have been increasingly delaying their moves to senior housing facilities, including to our leased and managed senior housing facilities, until they require greater care, and increasingly forgoing moving to senior housing facilities altogether. Further, rehabilitation therapy and other services are increasingly being provided to seniors on an outpatient basis or in seniors’ personal residences in response to market demand and government regulation, which may increase the trend for seniors to delay moving to senior housing facilities. Such delays may cause decreases in occupancy rates and increases in resident turnover rates at our senior housing facilities. Moreover, seniors may have greater care needs and require higher acuity services, which may increase our tenants’ and managers’ cost of business, expose our tenants and managers to additional liability or result in lost business and shorter stays at our leased and managed senior housing facilities if our tenants and managers are not able to provide the requisite care services or fail to adequately provide those services. These trends may negatively impact the occupancy rates, revenues, and cash flows at our leased and managed senior housing facilities and our results of operations. Further, if any of our tenants or managers are unable to offset lost revenues from these trends by providing and growing other revenue sources, such as new or increased service offerings to seniors, our senior housing facilities may be unprofitable and we may receive lower returns and rent, and the value of our senior housing facilities may decline.
Events that adversely affect the ability of seniors and their families to afford resident fees at our senior housing facilities could cause our occupancy rates, resident fee revenues and results of operations to decline.
Costs to seniors associated with independent and assisted living services are generally not reimbursable under government reimbursement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Only seniors with income or assets meeting or exceeding the comparable median in the regions where our facilities are located typically will be able to afford to pay the entrance fees and monthly resident fees, and a weak economy, depressed housing market or changes in demographics could adversely affect their continued ability to do so. If our tenants and operators are unable to retain and attract seniors with sufficient income, assets or other resources required to pay the fees associated with independent and assisted living services and other services provided by our tenants and operators at our healthcare facilities, our occupancy rates and resident fee revenues could decline, which could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
Some tenants of our current and future medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities will be subject to fraud and abuse laws, the violation of which by a tenant may jeopardize the tenant’s ability to make rent payments to us.
There are various federal and state laws prohibiting fraudulent and abusive business practices by healthcare providers who participate in, receive payments from or are in a position to make referrals in connection with government-sponsored healthcare programs, including the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Our lease arrangements with certain current and future tenants may also be subject to these fraud and abuse laws. In order to support compliance with the fraud and abuse laws, our lease agreements may be required to satisfy individual state law requirements that vary from state to state, such as the Stark Law exception and the Anti-Kickback Statute safe harbor for lease arrangements, which impacts the terms and conditions that may be negotiated in the lease arrangements.
These federal laws include:
the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for, or to induce, the referral of any item or service reimbursed by state or federal healthcare programs;
the Federal Physician Self-Referral Prohibition, which, subject to specific exceptions, restricts physicians from making referrals for specifically designated health services for which payment may be made under federal healthcare programs to an entity with which the physician, or an immediate family member, has a financial relationship;
the False Claims Act, which prohibits any person from knowingly presenting false or fraudulent claims for payment to the federal government, including claims paid by the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which authorizes the United States Department of Health & Human Services to impose monetary penalties or exclusion from participating in state or federal healthcare programs for certain fraudulent acts;
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended, or HIPAA, Fraud Statute, which makes it a federal crime to defraud any health benefit plan, including private payers;payors; and
the Exclusions Law, which authorizes the United States Department of Health & Human Services to exclude someone from participating in state or federal healthcare programs for certain fraudulent acts.
Each of these laws includes criminal and/or civil penalties for violations that range from punitive sanctions, damage assessments, penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid payments and/or exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Monetary penalties associated with violations of these laws have been increased in recent years. Certain laws, such as the False Claims Act, allow for individuals to bring whistleblower actions on behalf of the government for violations thereof. Additionally, states in which the facilities are located may have similar fraud and abuse laws. Investigation by a federal or state governmental body for violation of fraud and abuse laws or imposition of any of these penalties upon one of our tenants could jeopardize that tenant’s ability to operate or to make rent payments, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Adverse trends in healthcare provider operations may negatively affect our lease revenues and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
The healthcare industry is currently experiencing:
changes in the demand for and methods of delivering healthcare services;
changes in third-party reimbursement policies;
significant unused capacity in certain areas, which has created substantial competition for patients among healthcare providers in those areas;
increased expense for uninsured patients;
increased competition among healthcare providers;
increased liability insurance expense;
continued pressure by private and governmental payerspayors to reduce payments to providers of services;
increased scrutiny of billing, referral and other practices by federal and state authorities;
changes in federal and state healthcare program payment models;
increased emphasis on compliance with privacy and security requirements related to personal health information; and
increased instability in the Health Insurance Exchange market and lack of access to insurance plans participating in the exchange.
Moreover, the fines and penalties of HIPAA privacy and security rules increased in 2013. If a tenant breaches a patient’s protected health information and is fined by the federal government, the tenant’s ability to operate and pay rent may be adversely impacted.
These factors may adversely affect the economic performance of some or all of our tenants and, in turn, our lease revenues and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Operators/managers of healthcare properties that we own, or may acquire, may be affected by the financial deterioration, insolvency and/or bankruptcy of other significant operators/managers in the healthcare industry.
Certain companies in the healthcare industry, including some key senior housing operators/managers, are experiencing considerable financial, legal and/or regulatory difficulties which have resulted or may result in financial deterioration and, in some cases, insolvency and/or bankruptcy. The adverse effects on these companies could have a significant impact on the industry as a whole, including but not limited to negative public perception by investors, lenders and consumers. As a result, lessees of healthcare facilities that we own, or may acquire, could experience the damaging financial effects of a weakened industry sector driven by negative headlines, ultimately making them unable to meet their obligations to us, and our business could be adversely affected.
Our healthcare-related tenants may be subject to significant legal actions that could subject them to increased operating costs and substantial uninsured liabilities, which may affect their ability to pay their rent payments to us.
As is typical in the healthcare industry, our healthcare-related tenants may often become subject to claims that their services have resulted in patient injury or other adverse effects. Many of these tenants may have experienced an increasing trend in the frequency and severity of professional liability and general liability insurance claims and litigation asserted against them. The insurance coverage maintained by these tenants may not cover all claims made against them nor continue to be available at a reasonable cost, if at all. In some states, insurance coverage for the risk of punitive damages arising from professional liability and general liability claims and/or litigation may not, in certain cases, be available to these tenants due to state law prohibitions or limitations of availability. As a result, these types of tenants of our medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities operating in these states may be liable for punitive damage awards that are either not covered or are in excess of their insurance policy limits. We also believe that there has been, and will continue to be, an increase in governmental investigations of certain healthcare providers, particularly in the area of Medicare/Medicaid false claims, as well as an increase in enforcement actions resulting from these investigations. Insurance may not always be available to cover such losses. Any adverse determination in a legal proceeding or governmental investigation, whether currently asserted or arising in the future, could have a material adverse effect on a tenant’s financial condition. If a tenant is unable to obtain or maintain insurance coverage, if judgments are obtained in excess of the insurance coverage, if a tenant is required to pay uninsured punitive damages, or if a tenant is subject to an uninsurable government enforcement action, the tenant could be exposed to substantial additional liabilities, which may affect the tenant’s ability to pay
rent, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Comprehensive healthcare reform legislation, the effects of which are not yet known, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
The Healthcare Reform Act is intended to reduce the number of individuals in the United States without health insurance and effect significant other changes to the ways in which healthcare is organized, delivered and reimbursed. Included within the legislation is a limitation on physician-owned hospitals from expanding, unless the facility satisfies very narrow federal exceptions to this limitation. Therefore, if our tenants are physicians that own and refer to a hospital, the hospital would be limited in its operations and expansion potential, which may limit the hospital’s services and resulting revenues and may impact the owner’s ability to make rental payments. The legislation will become effective through a phased approach, having begun in 2010 and concluding in 2018. On June 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court upheld the individual mandate under the Healthcare Reform Act, although substantially limiting its expansion of Medicaid. At this time, the effects of healthcare reform and its impact on our properties are not yet known but could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law and repeals the individual mandate beginning in 2019.
On May 4, 2017, members of the House of Representatives approved legislation to repeal portions of the Healthcare Reform Act, which legislation was submitted to the Senate for approval. On July 25, 2017, the Senate rejected a complete repeal and, further, on July 27, 2017, the Senate rejected a repeal on the Healthcare Reform Act’s individual and employer mandates and a temporary repeal on the medical device tax. Furthermore, on October 12, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order the purpose of which was to, among other things, (i) cut healthcare cost-sharing reduction subsidies, (ii) allow more small businesses to join together to purchase insurance coverage, (iii) extend short-term coverage policies, and (iv) expand employers’ ability to provide workers cash to buy coverage elsewhere. If our tenants’ patients do not have insurance, it could adversely impact the tenants’ ability to pay rent and operate a practice.
There are also multiple lawsuits in several judicial districts brought by qualified health plans to recover the prior risk corridor payments that were anticipated to be paid as part of the health insurance exchange program. The multiple lawsuits are moving through the judicial process. Further, there is a current lawsuit, United States House of Representatives vs. Price, which alleges that the Executive Branch of the United States of America exceeded its authority in implementing the risk corridor payments under the Healthcare Reform Act and therefore the payments should not be made. At this time, the case is pending. If the Trump Administration or the court system determines that risk corridor or risk share payments are not required to be paid to the qualified health plans offering insurance coverage on the health insurance exchange program, the insurance companies may cease participation, causing millions of beneficiaries to lose insurance coverage. Therefore, our tenants may have an increase of self-pay patients and collections may decline, adversely impacting the tenants’ ability to pay rent.
On January 11, 2018, CMS issued guidance to support state efforts to improve Medicaid enrollee health outcomes by incentivizing community engagement among able-bodied, working-age Medicaid beneficiaries. The policy excludes individuals eligible for Medicaid due to a disability, elderly beneficiaries, children and pregnant women. CMS received proposals from 10 states seeking requirements for able-bodied Medicaid beneficiaries to engage in employment and community engagement initiatives. Kentucky and Indiana are the first states to obtain a waiver for their programs and require Medicaid beneficiaries to work or get ready for employment. If the “work requirement” expands to the states’ Medicaid programs it may decrease the number of patients eligible for Medicaid. The patients that are no longer eligible for Medicaid may become self-pay patients, which may adversely impact our tenants’ ability to receive reimbursement. If our tenants’ patient payor mix becomes more self-pay patients, it may impact our tenants’ ability to collect revenues and pay rent.
We, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses may be subject to various government reviews, audits and investigations that could adversely affect our business, including an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us, potential criminal charges, the imposition of fines, and/or the loss of the right to participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs.
As a result of our tenants’ participation in the Medicaid and Medicare programs, we, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses are subject to various governmental reviews, audits and investigations to verify compliance with these programs and applicable laws and regulations. We, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses are also subject to audits under various government programs, including Recovery Audit Contractors, Zone Program Integrity Contractors, Program Safeguard Contractors, Medicaid Integrity Contractors and Unified Program Integrity Contractor programs, in which third party firms engaged by CMS conduct extensive reviews of claims data and medical and other records to identify potential improper payments under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Private pay sources also reserve the right to conduct audits. Billing and reimbursement errors and disagreements occur in the healthcare industry. We, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses may be engaged in reviews, audits and appeals of claims for reimbursement due to the subjectivities inherent in the process related to patient diagnosis and care, record keeping, claims
processing and other aspects of the patient service and reimbursement processes, and the errors and disagreements those subjectivities can produce. An adverse review, audit or investigation could result in:
an obligation to refund amounts previously paid to us, our tenants or our operators pursuant to the Medicare or Medicaid programs or from private payors, in amounts that could be material to our business;
state or federal agencies imposing fines, penalties and other sanctions on us, our tenants or our operators;
loss of our right, our tenants’ right or our operators’ right to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid programs or one or more private payor networks;
an increase in private litigation against us, our tenants or our operators; and
damage to our reputation in various markets.
While we, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses have always been subject to post-payment audits and reviews, more intensive “probe reviews” appear to be a permanent procedure with our fiscal intermediaries. Generally, findings of overpayment from CMS contractors are eligible for appeal through the CMS defined continuum, but there may be rare instances that are not eligible for appeal. We, our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses utilize all defenses at our disposal to demonstrate that the services provided meet all clinical and regulatory requirements for reimbursement.
If the government or court were to conclude that such errors, deficiencies or disagreements constituted criminal violations, or were to conclude that such errors, deficiencies or disagreements resulted in the submission of false claims to federal healthcare programs, or if the government were to discover other problems in addition to the ones identified by the probe reviews that rose to actionable levels, we and certain of our officers, and our tenants and operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses and certain of their officers, might face potential criminal charges and/or civil claims, administrative sanctions and penalties for amounts that could be material to our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we and/or some of the key personnel of our operating subsidiaries, or those of our tenants and operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses, could be temporarily or permanently excluded from future participation in state and federal healthcare reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. In any event, it is likely that a governmental investigation alone, regardless of its outcome, would divert material time, resources and attention from our management team and our staff, or those of our tenants and our operators for our skilled nursing, senior housing and integrated senior health campuses and could have a materially detrimental impact on our results of operations during and after any such investigation or proceedings.
In cases where claim and documentation review by any CMS contractor results in repeated poor performance, a facility can be subjected to protracted oversight. This oversight may include repeat education and re-probe, extended pre-payment review, referral to recovery audit or integrity contractors, or extrapolation of an error rate to other reimbursement outside of specifically reviewed claims. Sustained failure to demonstrate improvement towards meeting all claim filing and documentation requirements could ultimately lead to Medicare and Medicaid decertification, which could have a materially detrimental impact on our results of operations. Adverse actions by CMS may also cause third party payerpayor or licensure authorities to audit our tenants. These additional audits could result in termination of third party payerpayor agreements or licensure of the facility, which would also adversely impact our operations.
The Healthcare Reform Law imposes additional requirements on skilled nursing facilities regarding compliance and disclosure.
The Health Care and Education and Reconciliation Act of 2010, or the Healthcare Reform Law, requires skilled nursing facilities to have a compliance and ethics program that is effective in preventing and detecting criminal, civil and administrative violations and in promoting quality of care. The United States Department of Health and Human Services included in the final rule published on October 4, 2016 the requirement for operators to implement a compliance and ethics program as a condition of participation in Medicare and Medicaid. Long-term care facilities, including skilled nursing facilities, had until November 28, 2019 to comply. If our operators fall short in their compliance and ethics programs and quality assurance and performance improvement programs, if and when required, their reputations and ability to attract residents could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Debt Financing
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments, and therefore, negatively impact our operating results.
Interest we pay on our debt obligations will reduce cash available for distributions. Whenever we incur variable-rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest costs, which would reduce our cash flows and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. If we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments in properties at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.
In addition, our variable-rate debt instruments use London Interbank Offering Rate, or LIBOR, as a benchmark for establishing the interest rate. In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority, or FCA, that regulates LIBOR isannounced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the subjectcalculation of recent national, internationalLIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, as its preferred alternative to USD LIBOR in derivatives and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. Such reforms may causefinancial contracts. We are not able to predict when LIBOR will cease to be replaced entirelyavailable or to perform differently thanwhen there will be sufficient liquidity in the past.SOFR markets. Any changes adopted by FCA or other governing bodies in the method used for determining LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR. In addition, uncertainty about the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher or lower than if LIBOR were to remain available in its current form. The consequences of these developments are uncertain, but could include an increase in the cost of our variable-rate debt instruments. If LIBOR is no longer widely available, or otherwise at our option, we may need to renegotiate with our lenders that utilize LIBOR as a factor in determining the interest rate to replace LIBOR with the new standard that is established. As such, the potential phase-out of LIBOR may have a material adverse effect on the interest rates on our current and future borrowings.
To the extent we borrow at fixed rates or enter into fixed interest rate swaps, we will not benefit from reduced interest expense if interest rates decrease.
We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of borrowings we will usehave used to maintain liquidity and fund expansion and refinancing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. To limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs while taking into account variable interest rate risk, we have borrowed and may continue to borrow at fixed rates or variable rates depending upon prevailing market conditions. We have and may also continue to enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. Therefore, to the extent we borrow at fixed rates or enter into fixed interest rate swaps, we will not benefit from reduced interest expense if interest rates decrease.
Hedging activity may expose us to risks.
We have used and may continue to use derivative financial instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in exchange rates and interest rates on loans secured by our loans.assets. If we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to credit risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. These derivative instruments are speculative in nature and there is no guarantee that they will be effective. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our ability to incur additional debt and affect our distribution and operating strategies. We have entered into and may continue to enter into loan documents that contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance coverage, or replace our advisor. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to achieve our investment objectives.
Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default, adversely affect our ability to refinance or sell properties and ultimately may reduce our funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may finance or refinance our properties using interest-only mortgage indebtedness. During the interest-only period, the amount of each scheduled payment will be less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan will not be reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal during this period. After the interest-only period, we will be required either to make scheduled payments of amortized principal and interest or to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. TheseAt the time such a balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the particular property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. Furthermore, these required principal or balloon payments will increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our risk of default under the related mortgage loan. If the mortgage loan has an adjustable interest rate, the amount of our scheduled payments also may increase at a time of rising interest rates. Increased payments and substantial principal or balloon maturity payments will reduce the funds available for distribution to our stockholders because cash otherwise available for distribution will be required to pay principal and interest associated with these mortgage loans.
If we enter into financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations, it may adversely affect our ability to refinance or sell properties on favorable terms, and to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Some of our future financing arrangements may require us to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or our ability to sell the particular property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the particular property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. The refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to our stockholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets. In an environment of increasing mortgage rates, if we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance such debt if mortgage rates are higher at a time a balloon payment is due. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debts, including balloon payments, may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to qualifymaintain our qualification as a REIT. Any of these results would have a significant, negative impact on our stockholders’ investment.
If we are required to make payments under any “bad boy” carve-out guaranties that we may provide in connection with certain mortgages and related loans, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.
In obtaining certain nonrecourse loans, we have provided and may continue to provide standard carve-out guaranties. These guaranties are only applicable if and when the borrower directly, or indirectly through agreement with an affiliate, joint venture partner or other third party, voluntarily files a bankruptcy or similar liquidation or reorganization action or takes other actions that are fraudulent or improper (commonly referred to as “bad boy” guaranties). Although we believe that “bad boy” carve-out guaranties are not guaranties of payment in the event of foreclosure or other actions of the foreclosing lender that are beyond the borrower’s control, some lenders in the real estate industry have recently sought to make claims for payment under such guaranties. In the event such a claim were made against us under a “bad boy” carve-out guaranty following foreclosure on mortgages or related loan, and such claim were successful, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Related to Real Estate-Related Investments
The mortgage loans in which we have invested in and may invest in and the mortgage loans underlying the mortgage-backed securities in which we have and may continue to invest may be impacted by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease their value.
The investment in mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities we have invested in and may continue to invest in involve special risks relating to the particular borrower or issuer of the mortgage-backed securities and we will be at risk of loss on those investments, including losses as a result of defaults on mortgage loans. These losses may be caused by many conditions beyond our control, including economic conditions affecting real estate values, tenant defaults and lease expirations, interest rate levels and the other economic and liability risks associated with real estate. If we acquire property by foreclosure following defaults under our mortgage loan investments, we will have the economic and liability risks as the owner described above. We do not know whether the values of the property securing any of our real estate-related investments will remain at the levels existing on the dates we initially make the related investment. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase and the values of our interests may decrease.
Delays in liquidating defaulted mortgage loan investments could reduce our investment returns.
If there are defaults under our mortgage loan investments, we may not be able to foreclose on or obtain a suitable remedy with respect to such investments. Specifically, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying properties quickly, which could reduce the value of our investment. For example, an action to foreclose on a property securing a mortgage
loan is regulated by state statutes and rules and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of lawsuits if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. Additionally, in the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the mortgage loan.
The commercial mortgage-backed securities in which we have invested and may continue to invest are subject to several types of risks.
Commercial mortgage-backed securities are bonds which evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Accordingly, the mortgage-backed securities in which we have invested and may continue to invest are subject to all the risks of the underlying mortgage loans.
In a rising interest rate environment, the value of commercial mortgage-backed securities may be adversely affected when payments on underlying mortgages do not occur as anticipated, resulting in the extension of the security’s effective maturity and the related increase in interest rate sensitivity of a longer-term instrument. The value of commercial mortgage-backed securities may also change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities markets as a whole. In addition, commercial mortgage-backed securities are subject to the credit risk associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties.
Commercial mortgage-backed securities are also subject to several risks created through the securitization process. Subordinate commercial mortgage-backed securities are paid interest-only to the extent that there are funds available to make payments. To the extent the collateral pool includes a large percentage of delinquent loans, there is a risk that interest payments on subordinate commercial mortgage-backed securities will not be fully paid. Subordinate securities of commercial mortgage-backed securities are also subject to greater credit risk than those commercial mortgage-backed securities that are more highly rated.
The mezzanine loans in which we have invested and may continue to invest involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing real estate.
We have invested and may continue to invest in mezzanine loans that take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying real estate or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the real estate or the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the real estate. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real estate because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the real estate and increasing the risk of loss of principal.
Real estate-related equity securities in which we may invest are subject to specific risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities and may be subject to the general risks of investing in real estate or real estate-related assets.
We may invest in the common and preferred stock of both publicly traded and private unaffiliated real estate companies, which involves a higher degree of risk than debt securities due to a variety of factors, including the fact that such investments are subordinate to creditors and are not secured by the issuer’s property. Our investments in real estate-related equity securities will involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the equity securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer. Issuers of real estate-related equity securities generally invest in real estate or real estate-related assets and are subject to the inherent risks associated with acquiring real estate-related investments discussed elsewhere in this report, including risks relating to rising interest rates.
We expect a portion of our real estate-related investments to be illiquid and we may not be able to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions.
We may acquire real estate-related investments in connection with privately negotiated transactions which are not registered under the relevant securities laws, resulting in a prohibition against their transfer, sale, pledge or other disposition except in a transaction that is exempt from the registration requirements of, or is otherwise in accordance with, those laws. As a result, our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited. The mezzanine and bridge loans we may purchase will be particularly illiquid investments due to their short life, their unsuitability for securitization and the greater difficulty of recoupment in the event of a borrower’s default.
Interest rate and related risks may cause the value of our real estate-related investments to be reduced.
Interest rate risk is the risk that fixed income securities such as preferred and debt securities, and to a lesser extent dividend paying common stocks, will decline in value because of changes in market interest rates. Generally, when market interest rates rise, the market value of such securities will decline, and vice versa. Our investment in such securities means that the net asset value and market price of the common stock may tend to decline if market interest rates rise.
During periods of rising interest rates, the average life of certain types of securities may be extended because of slower than expected principal payments. This may lock in a below-market interest rate, increase the security’s duration and reduce the value of the security. This is known as extension risk. During periods of declining interest rates, an issuer may be able to exercise an option to prepay principal earlier than scheduled, which is generally known as call or prepayment risk. If this occurs, we may be forced to reinvest in lower yielding securities. This is known as reinvestment risk. Preferred and debt securities frequently have call features that allow the issuer to repurchase the security prior to its stated maturity. An issuer may redeem an obligation if the issuer can refinance the debt at a lower cost due to declining interest rates or an improvement in the credit standing of the issuer. These risks may reduce the value of our real estate-related investments.
If we liquidate prior to the maturity of our real estate-related investments, we may be forced to sell those investments on unfavorable terms or at a loss.
Our board may choose to effect a liquidity event in which we liquidate our assets, including our real estate-related investments. If we liquidate those investments prior to their maturity, we may be forced to sell those investments on unfavorable terms or at a loss. For instance, if we are required to liquidate mortgage loans at a time when prevailing interest rates are higher than the interest rates of such mortgage loans, we would likely sell such loans at a discount to their stated principal values.
Risks Related to Joint Ventures
The termsProperty ownership through joint ventures could limit our control of joint venture agreements or other joint ownership arrangements into which we have enteredthose investments, restrict our ability to operate and may continue to enter could impairfinance the property on our operating flexibility or result in litigation or liability, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations.term and reduce their expected return.
In connection with the purchase of real estate, we have and may continue to enter into joint ventures with third parties, including affiliates of our advisor. We may also purchase or develop properties in co-ownership arrangements with the sellers of the properties, developers or other persons. We own operating properties through both consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. These structures involve participation in the investment by other parties whose interests and rights may not be the same as ours. Our joint venture partnersventures, and joint ventures we may have rights to take some actions over which we have no control and may take actions contrary to our interests. Joint ownership of an investmententer into in real estatethe future, may involve risks not associatedpresent with direct ownership of real estate,respect to our wholly owned properties, including the following:
a venture partnerwe may at any time have economic or other business interests or goals which become inconsistentshare decision-making authority with our business interestsjoint venture partners regarding certain major decisions affecting the ownership or goals, including inconsistent goals relatingoperation of the joint venture and the joint venture property, such as, but not limited to, (i) additional capital contribution requirements, (ii) obtaining, refinancing or paying off debt and (iii) obtaining consent prior to the sale or transfer of properties heldour interest in athe joint venture or the timing of the termination and liquidation of the venture;to a third party, which may prevent us from taking actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners;
aour joint venture partnerpartners might become bankrupt and such proceedings could have an adverse impact on the operation of the partnership or joint venture;
actions taken by aour joint venture partner mightpartners may have the result of subjecting the property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated; and
a venture partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructionsbusiness interests or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives, including our policygoals with respect to maintainingthe property that conflict with our business interests and goals, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;
disputes may develop with our joint venture partners over decisions affecting the property or the joint venture, which may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and distract our officers from focusing their time and effort on our business, disrupt the day-to-day operations of the property such as by delaying the implementation of important decisions until the conflict is resolved, and possibly force a sale of the property if the dispute cannot be resolved; and
the activities of a joint venture could adversely affect our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
Under certain joint venture arrangements, neither venture partner may have the power to control the venture, and an impasse could occur, which might adversely affect the joint venture or result in litigation or liability and decrease potential returns to our stockholders. If we have a right of first refusal or buy/sell right to buy out a venture partner, we may be unable to finance such a buy-out or we may be forced to exercise those rights at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. If our interest is subject to a buy/sell right, we may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to purchase an interest of a venture partner subject to the buy/sell right, in which case we may be forced to sell our interest when we would otherwise prefer to retain our interest. In addition, we may not be able to sell our interest in a joint venture on a timely basis or on acceptable terms if we desire to exit the venture for any reason, particularly if our interest is subject to a right of first refusal of our venture partner.
We may structure our joint venture relationships in a manner which may limit the amount we participate in the cash flows or appreciation of an investment.
We have and may continue to enter into joint venture agreements, the economic terms of which may provide for the distribution of income to us otherwise than in direct proportion to our ownership interest in the joint venture. For example, while we and a co-venturer may invest an equal amount of capital in an investment, the investment may be structured such that we have a right to priority distributions of cash flows up to a certain target return while the co-venturer may receive a disproportionately greater share of cash flows than we are to receive once such target return has been achieved. This type of investment structure may result in the co-venturer receiving more of the cash flows, including appreciation, of an investment than we would receive. If we do not accurately judge the appreciation prospects of a particular investment or structure the venture appropriately, we may incur losses on joint venture investments or have limited participation in the profits of a joint venture investment, either of which could reduce our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders.
Federal Income Tax Risks
Failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes would subject us to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, which would substantially reduce our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
We qualified and elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014. To continue to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet various requirements set forth in the Code concerning, among other things, the ownership of our outstanding common stock, the nature of our assets, the sources of our income and the amount of our distributions to our stockholders. The REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex, and interpretations of the federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT are limited. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in operating so as to maintain our qualification as a REIT. At any time, new laws, interpretations or court decisions may change the federal tax laws relating to, or the federal income tax consequences of, qualification as a REIT. It is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause our board to determine that it is not in our best interest to maintain our qualification as a REIT, and to revoke our REIT election, which it may do without stockholder approval.
If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status unless the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to our stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions would no longer qualify for the distributions paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to pay distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax.
As a result of all these factors, our failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, and would substantially reduce our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
To maintain our qualification as a REIT and to avoid the payment of federal income and excise taxes, we may be forced to borrow funds, use proceeds from the issuance of securities (including our initial offering), or sell assets to pay distributions, which may result in our distributing amounts that may otherwise be used for our operations.
To obtain the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs, we normally will be required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for distributions paid and by excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4.0% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (i) 85.0% of our ordinary income, (ii) 95.0% of our capital gain net income and (iii) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years.
These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on acquisitions of properties and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds, use proceeds from the issuance of securities (including our initial offering) or sell assets in order to distribute enough of our taxable income to maintain our qualification as a REIT and to avoid the payment of federal income and excise taxes.
Our investment strategy may cause us to incur penalty taxes, lose our REIT status, or own and sell properties through TRSs, each of which would diminish the return to our stockholders.
In light of our investment strategy, it is possible that one or more sales of our properties may be “prohibited transactions” under provisions of the Code. If we are deemed to have engaged in a “prohibited transaction” (i.e., we sell a property held by us
primarily for sale in the ordinary course of our trade or business), all income that we derive from such sale would be subject to a 100% tax. The Code sets forth a safe harbor for REITs that wish to sell property without risking the imposition of the 100% tax. A principal requirement of the safe harbor is that the REIT must hold the applicable property for not less than two years prior to its sale. Given our investment strategy, it is entirely possible, if not likely, that the sale of one or more of our properties will not fall within the prohibited transaction safe harbor.
If we desire to sell a property pursuant to a transaction that does not fall within the safe harbor, we may be able to avoid the 100% penalty tax if we acquired the property through a taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS or acquired the property and transferred it to a TRS for a non-tax business purpose prior to the sale (i.e., for a reason other than the avoidance of taxes). However, there may be circumstances that prevent us from using a TRS in a transaction that does not qualify for the safe harbor. Additionally, even if it is possible to effect a property disposition through a TRS, we may decide to forego the use of a TRS in a transaction that does not meet the safe harbor based on our own internal analysis, the opinion of counsel or the opinion of other tax advisors that the disposition will not be subject to the 100% penalty tax. In cases where a property disposition is not effected through a TRS, the IRS could successfully assert that the disposition constitutes a prohibited transaction, in which event all of the net income from the sale of such property will be payable as a tax and none of the proceeds from such sale will be distributable by us to our stockholders or available for investment by us.
If we acquire a property that we anticipate will not fall within the safe harbor from the 100% penalty tax upon disposition, then we may acquire such property through a TRS in order to avoid the possibility that the sale of such property will be a prohibited transaction and subject to the 100% penalty tax. If we already own such a property directly or indirectly through an entity other than a TRS, we may contribute the property to a TRS if there is another, non-tax-related business purpose for the contribution of such property to the TRS. Following the transfer of the property to a TRS, the TRS will operate the property and may sell such property and distribute the net proceeds from such sale to us, and we may distribute the net proceeds distributed to us by the TRS to our stockholders. Though a sale of the property by a TRS likely would eliminate the danger of the application of the 100% penalty tax, the TRS itself would be subject to a tax at the federal level, and potentially at the state and local levels, on the gain realized by it from the sale of the property as well as on the income earned while the property is operated by the TRS. This tax obligation would diminish the amount of the proceeds from the sale of such property that would be distributable to our stockholders. As a result, the amount available for distribution to our stockholders would be substantially less than if the REIT had operated and sold such property directly and such transaction was not characterized as a prohibited transaction. The maximum federal corporate income tax rate is currently 21.0%. Federal, state and local corporate income tax rates may be increased in the future, and any such increase would reduce the amount of the net proceeds available for distribution by us to our stockholders from the sale of property through a TRS after the effective date of any increase in such tax rates.
If we own too many properties through one or more of our TRSs, then we may lose our status as a REIT. If we fail to qualifymaintain our qualification as a REIT for any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year of losing our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the distributions paid deduction, and we would no longer be required to pay distributions. If this occurs, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax. As a REIT, the value of the securities we hold in all of our TRSs may not exceed 20.0% of the value of all of our assets at the end of any calendar quarter. If the IRS were to determine that the value of our interests in all of our TRSs exceeded 20.0% of the value of total assets at the end of any calendar quarter, then we would fail to qualifymaintain our qualification as a REIT. If we determine it to be in our best interest to own a substantial number of our properties through one or more TRSs, then it is possible that the IRS may conclude
that the value of our interests in our TRSs exceeds 20.0% of the value of our total assets at the end of any calendar quarter, and therefore, cause us to fail to qualifymaintain our qualification as a REIT. Additionally, as a REIT, no more than 25.0% of our gross income with respect to any year may be from sources other than real estate. Distributions paid to us from a TRS are considered to be non-real estate income. Therefore, we may fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT if distributions from all of our TRSs, when aggregated with all other non-real estate income with respect to any one year, are more than 25.0% of our gross income with respect to such year. We will use all reasonable efforts to structure our activities in a manner intended to satisfy the requirements for our qualification as a REIT. Our failure to maintain our qualification as a REIT would adversely affect our stockholders’ return on their investment.
Our stockholders may have a current tax liability on distributions they elect to reinvest in shares of our common stock.
If our stockholders participate in our DRIP Offerings, they will be deemed to have received, and for United States federal income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in shares of our common stock to the extent the amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. In addition, our stockholders may be treated, for United States federal tax purposes, as having received an additional distribution to the extent the shares are purchased at a discount from fair market value. As a result, unless our stockholders are a tax-exempt
entity, our stockholders may have to use funds from other sources to pay their tax liability on the value of the shares of common stock received.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could increase our tax liability or reduce our operating flexibility, including the recently passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of federal and state income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in shares of our common stock. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur, and we cannot assure our stockholders that any such changes will not adversely affect our taxation and our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT or the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in shares of our common stock or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. Our stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on their investment in our stock and the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in shares of our common stock.
Although REITs generally receive better tax treatment than entities taxed as regular corporations, it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for U.S.United States federal income tax purposes as a regular corporation. As a result, our charter provides our board of directors with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, without the vote of our stockholders. Our board of directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interests of our stockholders.
In addition, on December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made significant changes to the U.S.United States federal income tax rules for taxation of individuals and businesses, generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. In addition to reducing corporate and individual tax rates, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminates or restricts various deductions. Most of the changes applicable to individuals are temporary and apply only to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made numerous large and small changes to the tax rules that do not affect the REIT qualification rules directly but may otherwise affect us or our stockholders.
While the changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act generally appear to be favorable with respect to REITs, the extensive changes to non-REIT provisions in the Code may have unanticipated effects on us or our stockholders. Moreover, Congressional leaders have recognized that the process of adopting extensive tax legislation in a short amount of time without hearings and substantial time for review is likely to have led to drafting errors, issues needing clarification and unintended consequences that will have to be revisited in subsequent tax legislation. At this point, it is not clear if or when Congress will address these issues or when the IRS will issue administrative guidance on the changes made in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
We urge our stockholders to consult with their own tax advisor with respect to the status of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and other legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in shares of our common stock.
In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes even if we maintain our qualification as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Even if we maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may be subject to federal income taxes or state taxes. For example, net income from a “prohibited transaction” will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain capital gains we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, our stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have no benefit from their deemed payment of such tax liability. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any federal or state taxes we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates on dividend income as compared to regular corporations, which could adversely affect the value of our shares.
The maximum U.S.United States federal income tax rate for certain qualified dividends payable to domestic stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates generally is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for these reduced rates for qualified dividends. ThroughFor taxable years ending in 2025,beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permits a deduction for certain pass-through business income, including “qualified REIT dividends” (generally, dividends received by a REIT stockholder that are not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income), which allows U.S.United States individuals,
trusts, and estates to deduct up to 20% of such amounts, subject to certain limitations, resulting in an effective maximum U.S.United States federal income tax rate of 29.6% on such qualified REIT dividends. Although the reduced U.S.United States federal income tax rate applicable to dividend income from regular corporate dividends does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends paid by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to qualified dividends from C corporations could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our shares.
Distributions to tax-exempt stockholders may be classified as UBTI.
Neither ordinary nor capital gain distributions with respect to the shares of our common stock nor gain from the sale of the shares of our common stock should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income, or UBTI, to a tax-exempt stockholder. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. In particular:
part of the income and gain recognized by certain qualified employee pension trusts with respect to our common stock may be treated as UBTI if the shares of our common stock are predominately held by qualified employee pension trusts, and we are required to rely on a special look-through rule for purposes of meeting one of the REIT share ownership tests, and we are not operated in a manner to avoid treatment of such income or gain as UBTI;
part of the income and gain recognized by a tax exempt stockholder with respect to the shares of our common stock would constitute UBTI if the stockholder incurs debt in order to acquire the shares of our common stock; and
part or all of the income or gain recognized with respect to the shares of our common stock by social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans which are exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (9), (17) or (20) of the Code may be treated as UBTI.
Characterization of our sale-leaseback transactions may be challenged.
We have and may continue to participate in sale-leaseback transactions in which we purchase real estate investments and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. Our advisor will use its best efforts to structure any of our sale-leaseback transactions such that the lease will be characterized as a “true lease” and so that we will be treated as the owner of the property for federal income tax purposes. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that the IRS will not challenge such characterization. In the event that any such sale-leaseback transaction is re-characterized as a financing transaction for federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such real estate investment would be disallowed or significantly reduced. If a sale-leaseback transaction is so re-characterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT asset tests or income tests and, consequently, lose our REIT status.
We cannot assure our stockholders that our goal to maximize our investment objectives will be realized.
Our advisor and our board determine whether a particular property or real estate-related investment should be sold or otherwise disposed of after consideration of the relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view toward maximizing our investment objectives. We cannot assure our stockholders that this objective will be realized. The selling price of a property which is net leased will be determined in large part by the amount of rent payable under the lease(s) for such property. If a tenant has a repurchase option at a formula price, we may be limited in realizing any appreciation. In connection with our sales of properties, we may lend the purchaser all or a portion of the purchase price. In these instances, our taxable income may exceed the cash received in the sale.
Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.
To maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of shares of our common stock. We may be required to pay distributions to our stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution, or we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments in order to comply with the REIT tests. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.
If our operating partnership fails to maintain its status as a disregarded entity or as a partnership, its income may be subject to taxation, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to stockholders and likely result in a loss of our REIT status.
We intend to maintain the status of the operating partnership as a disregarded entity or as a partnership for U.S.United States federal income tax purposes. However, if the IRS were to successfully challenge the status of the operating partnership as a disregarded entity or as a partnership for such purposes, it would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, this would reduce the amount of distributions that the operating partnership could make to us. This would also likely result in our losing REIT status, and, if so, becoming subject to a corporate level tax on our own income. This would substantially reduce any cash available to pay distributions. In addition, if any of the partnerships or limited liability companies through which the operating partnership owns its properties, in whole or in part, loses its characterization as a partnership and is otherwise not disregarded for U.S.United States federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to taxation as a corporation, thereby reducing distributions to the operating partnership. Such a recharacterization of an underlying property owner could also threaten our ability to maintain our status as a REIT.
OurThe mezzanine loans in which we may invest may not qualify as real estate assets and could adversely affect our status as a REIT.
We have invested and may continue to invest in mezzanine loans, for which the IRS has provided a safe harbor, but not rules of substantive law. Pursuant to the safe harbor, if a mezzanine loan meets certain requirements, the IRS will treat the mezzanine loan as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% income test. To the extent that any mezzanine loans do not meet all of the requirements for reliance on the safe harbor, such loans may not be real estate assets and could adversely affect our qualification as a REIT.
Foreign purchasers of shares of our common stock may be subject to FIRPTA tax upon the sale of their shares of our common stock.
A foreign person disposing of a United States real property interest, including shares of stock of a United States corporation whose assets consist principally of United States real property interests, is generally subject to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, as amended, or FIRPTA, on the amount received from the disposition. However, foreign pension plans and certain foreign publicly traded entities are exempt from FIRPTA withholding. Further, such FIRPTA tax does not apply to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is “domestically controlled.” A REIT is “domestically controlled” if less than 50.0% of the REIT’s stock, by value, has been owned directly or indirectly by persons who are not qualifying United States persons during a continuous five-year period ending on the date of disposition or, if shorter, during the entire period of the REIT’s existence. We cannot assure our stockholders that we will qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, amounts received by foreign investors on a sale of shares of our common stock would be subject to FIRPTA tax, unless the shares of our common stock were traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specified period directly or indirectly own more than 10.0% of the value of our outstanding common stock. However, these rules do not apply to foreign pension plans and certain publicly traded entities.
Foreign stockholders may be subject to FIRPTA tax upon the payment of a capital gains dividend.
A foreign stockholder will likely be subject to FIRPTA upon the payment of any capital gain dividends by us if such gain is attributable to gain from sales or exchanges of United States real property interests. However, these rules do not apply to foreign pension plans and certain publicly traded entities.
Employee Benefit Plan, IRA, and Other Tax-Exempt Investor Risks
We, and our stockholders that are employee benefit plans, IRAs, annuities described in Sections 403(a) or (b) of the Code, Archer Medical Savings Accounts, health savings accounts, Coverdell education savings accounts, and other arrangements that are subject to ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code (referred to generally as “Benefit Plans and IRAs”) will be subject to risks relating specifically to our having such Benefit Plan and IRA stockholders, which risks are discussed below.
If a stockholder that is a Benefit Plan or IRA fails to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA or the Code as a result of an investment in shares of our common stock, such stockholder could be subject to civil and criminal, if the failure is willful, penalties.
There are special considerations that apply to Benefit Plans and IRAs investing in shares of our common stock. Stockholders that are Benefit Plans and IRAs should consider:
whether their investment is consistent with the applicable provisions of ERISA and the Code, or any other applicable governing authority in the case of a plan not subject to ERISA or the Code;
whether their investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing the Benefit Plan or IRA, including any investment policy;
whether their investment satisfies the prudence, diversification and other requirements of Sections 404(a)(1)(B) and 404(a)(1)(C) of ERISA or any similar rule under other applicable laws or regulations;
whether their investment will impair the liquidity needs, the minimum and other distribution requirements, or the tax withholding requirements that may be applicable to such Benefit Plan or IRA;
whether their investment will constitute a prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code or any similar rule under other applicable laws or regulations;
whether their investment will produce or result in UBTI, as defined in Sections 511 through 514 of the Code, to the Benefit Plan or IRA;
whether their investment will impair the Benefit Plan’s or IRA’s need to value its assets annually (or more frequently) in accordance with ERISA, the Code and the applicable provisions of the Benefit Plan or IRA; and
whether their investment will cause our assets to be treated as “plan assets” of the Benefit Plan or IRA.
Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA, the Code, or other applicable statutory or common law may result in the imposition of civil and criminal (if the violation is willful) penalties, and can subject the fiduciary to equitable remedies. In addition, if an investment in our common stock constitutes a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Code, the “party-in-interest” (within the meaning of ERISA) or “disqualified person” (within the meaning of the Code) who authorized or directed the investment may have to compensate the plan for any losses the plan suffered as a result of the transaction or restore to the plan any profits made by such person as a result of the transaction, or may be subject to excise taxes with respect to the amount involved. In the case of a prohibited transaction involving an IRA, the IRA may be disqualified and all of the assets of the IRA may be deemed distributed and subject to tax.
In addition to considering their fiduciary responsibilities under ERISA and the prohibited transaction rules of ERISA and the Code, stockholders that are Benefit Plans and IRAs should consider the effect of the plan assets regulation, U.S.United States Department of Labor Regulation Section 2510.3-101, as modified by ERISA Section 3(42). To avoid our assets from being considered “plan assets” under the plan assets regulation, our charter prohibits “benefit plan investors” from owning 25% or more of the shares of our common stock prior to the time that the common stock qualifies as a class of publicly-offered securities, within the meaning of the plan assets regulation. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that those provisions in our charter will be effective in limiting benefit plan investors’ ownership to less than the 25% limit. For example, the limit could be unintentionally exceeded if a benefit plan investor misrepresents its status as a benefit plan investor. If our underlying assets were to be considered “plan assets” of a benefit plan investor subject to ERISA, (i) we would be an ERISA fiduciary and subject to certain fiduciary requirements of ERISA with which it would be difficult for us to comply and (ii) we could be restricted from entering into favorable transactions if the transaction, absent an exemption, would constitute a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Code. Even if our assets are not considered to be “plan assets,” a prohibited transaction could occur if we or any of our affiliates is a fiduciary (within the meaning of ERISA) of a Benefit Plan or IRA stockholder.
Due to the complexity of these rules and the potential penalties that may be imposed, it is important that stockholders that are Benefit Plans and IRAs consult with their own advisors regarding the potential applicability of ERISA, the Code and any similar applicable law.
Stockholders that are Benefit Plans and IRAs may be limited in their ability to withdraw required minimum distributions as a result of an investment in shares of our common stock.
If Benefit Plans or IRAs invest in our common stock, the Code may require such plan or IRA to withdraw required minimum distributions in the future. Our stock will be highly illiquid, and our share repurchase plan only offers limited liquidity. If a Benefit Plan or IRA requires liquidity, it may generally sell its shares, but such sale may be at a price less than the price at which such plan or IRA initially purchased its shares of our common stock. If a Benefit Plan or IRA fails to make required minimum distributions, it may be subject to certain taxes and tax penalties.
Specific rules apply to foreign, governmental and church plans.
As a general rule, certain employee benefit plans, including foreign pension plans, governmental plans established or maintained in the United States (as defined in Section 3(32) of ERISA), and certain church plans (as defined in Section 3(33) of ERISA), are not subject to ERISA’s requirements and are not “benefit plan investors” within the meaning of the plan assets regulation. Any such plan that is qualified and exempt from taxation under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code may nonetheless be subject to the prohibited transaction rules set forth in Section 503 of the Code and, under certain circumstances in the case of church plans, Section 4975 of the Code. Also, some foreign plans and governmental plans may be subject to foreign, state, or local laws which are, to a material extent, similar to the provisions of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code. Each fiduciary of a plan subject to any such similar law should make its own determination as to the need for, and the availability of, any exemption relief.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
Item 2. Properties.
As of December 31, 2018,2019, our principal executive offices are located at 18191 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 300, Irvine, California 92612. We do not have an address separate from our advisor or our co-sponsors. Since we pay our advisor fees for their services, we do not pay rent for the use of their space.
Real Estate Investments
As of December 31, 2018,2019, we operated through six reportable business segments comprised of 101102 buildings and 112118 integrated senior health campuses, or approximately 13,251,00013,836,000 square feet of GLA, acquired for an aggregate contract purchase price of $2,940,990,000.$3,001,462,000. These properties consisted of: 64 medical office buildings, 15nine senior housing facilities, 1320 senior housing — RIDEA facilities, seven skilled nursing facilities, two hospitals, as well as 112118 owned and/or operated integrated senior health campuses.
The following table presents certain additional information about our propertiesreal estate investments as of December 31, 2018:2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition(1) | | Location | | Reportable Segment | | GLA (Sq Ft) | | % of GLA | | Contract Purchase Price | | Annualized Base Rent/NOI(2) | | % of Annualized Base Rent | | Leased Percentage(3) | | Average Annual Rent Per Leased Sq Ft(4) |
| DeKalb Professional Center | | Lithonia, GA | | Medical Office | | 19,000 | | 0.1 | % | | $ | 2,830,000 |
| | $ | 248,000 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 81.2 | % | | $ | 16.28 |
|
| Country Club MOB | | Stockbridge, GA | | Medical Office | | 17,000 | | 0.1 |
| | 2,775,000 |
| | 92,000 |
| | — |
| | 33.7 | % | | $ | 16.37 |
|
| Acworth Medical Complex | | Acworth, GA | | Medical Office | | 39,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 6,525,000 |
| | 607,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 82.7 | % | | $ | 18.74 |
|
| Wichita KS MOB | | Wichita, KS | | Medical Office | | 39,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 8,800,000 |
| | 707,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 92.0 | % | | $ | 19.41 |
|
| Delta Valley ALF Portfolio | | Springdale, AR; and Batesville and Cleveland, MS | | Senior Housing | | 127,000 | | 1.0 |
| | 21,450,000 |
| | 1,731,000 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 13.59 |
|
| Lee’s Summit MO MOB | | Lee’s Summit, MO | | Medical Office | | 39,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 6,750,000 |
| | 1,022,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 26.00 |
|
| Carolina Commons MOB | | Indian Land, SC | | Medical Office | | 58,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 12,000,000 |
| | 1,401,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 77.2 | % | | $ | 31.18 |
|
| Mount Olympia MOB Portfolio | | Mount Dora, FL; Olympia Fields, IL; and Columbus, OH | | Medical Office | | 53,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 16,150,000 |
| | 1,192,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 87.8 | % | | $ | 25.81 |
|
| Southlake TX Hospital | | Southlake, TX | | Hospital | | 142,000 | | 1.1 |
| | 128,000,000 |
| | 7,179,000 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 50.41 |
|
| East Texas MOB Portfolio | | Longview and Marshall, TX | | Medical Office | | 393,000 | | 3.0 |
| | 68,500,000 |
| | 7,361,000 |
| | 3.4 |
| | 95.6 | % | | $ | 19.58 |
|
| Premier MOB | | Novi, MI | | Medical Office | | 45,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 12,025,000 |
| | 977,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 86.7 | % | | $ | 25.14 |
|
| Independence MOB Portfolio | | Southgate, KY; Somerville, MA; Morristown and Verona, NJ; and Bronx, NY | | Medical Office | | 477,000 | | 3.7 |
| | 135,000,000 |
| | 12,720,000 |
| | 5.8 |
| | 97.3 | % | | $ | 27.34 |
|
| King of Prussia PA MOB | | King of Prussia, PA | | Medical Office | | 73,000 | | 0.6 |
| | 18,500,000 |
| | 1,278,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 58.1 | % | | $ | 30.13 |
|
| North Carolina ALF Portfolio | | Clemmons, Huntersville, Matthews, Mooresville, Raleigh and Wake Forest, NC | | Senior Housing | | 239,000 | | 1.8 |
| | 98,856,000 |
| | 8,259,000 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 34.77 |
|
| Orange Star Medical Portfolio | | Durango, CO; and Friendswood, Keller and Wharton, TX | | Medical Office and Hospital | | 183,000 | | 1.4 |
| | 57,650,000 |
| | 4,267,000 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 97.5 | % | | $ | 23.99 |
|
| Kingwood MOB Portfolio | | Kingwood, TX | | Medical Office | | 43,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 14,949,000 |
| | 1,181,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 27.75 |
|
| Mt. Juliet TN MOB | | Mount Juliet, TN | | Medical Office | | 46,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 13,000,000 |
| | 711,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 66.6 | % | | $ | 23.37 |
|
| Homewood AL MOB | | Homewood, AL | | Medical Office | | 30,000 | | 0.2 |
| | 7,444,000 |
| | 125,000 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 17.9 | % | | $ | 23.19 |
|
| Paoli PA Medical Plaza | | Paoli, PA | | Medical Office | | 99,000 | | 0.7 |
| | 24,820,000 |
| | 2,291,000 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 85.0 | % | | $ | 27.16 |
|
| Glen Burnie MD MOB | | Glen Burnie, MD | | Medical Office | | 77,000 | | 0.6 |
| | 18,650,000 |
| | 1,612,000 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 89.6 | % | | $ | 23.52 |
|
| Marietta GA MOB | | Marietta, GA | | Medical Office | | 41,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 13,050,000 |
| | 973,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 23.83 |
|
| Mountain Crest Senior Housing Portfolio | | Elkhart, Hobart, LaPorte and Mishawaka, IN; and Niles, MI | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 585,000 | | 4.4 |
| | 75,035,000 |
| | 4,014,000 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 80.6 | % | | $ | 7,726.12 |
|
| Mount Dora Medical Center | | Mount Dora, FL | | Medical Office | | 51,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 16,300,000 |
| | 769,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 55.6 | % | | $ | 26.94 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate Investments(1) | | Location | | Reportable Segment | | GLA (Sq Ft) | | % of GLA | | Aggregate Contract Purchase Price | | Annualized Base Rent/NOI(2) | | % of Annualized Base Rent | | Leased Percentage(3) | | Average Annual Rent Per Leased Sq Ft(4) |
| DeKalb Professional Center | | Lithonia, GA | | Medical Office | | 19,000 |
| | 0.1 | % | | $ | 2,830,000 |
| | $ | 256,000 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 81.2 | % | | $ | 16.76 |
|
| Country Club MOB | | Stockbridge, GA | | Medical Office | | 17,000 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 2,775,000 |
| | 221,000 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 84.1 | % | | $ | 15.78 |
|
| Acworth Medical Complex | | Acworth, GA | | Medical Office | | 39,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 6,525,000 |
| | 621,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 82.7 | % | | $ | 19.17 |
|
| Wichita KS MOB | | Wichita, KS | | Medical Office | | 39,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 8,800,000 |
| | 729,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 94.1 | % | | $ | 19.57 |
|
| Delta Valley ALF Portfolio | | Springdale, AR; and Batesville and Cleveland, MS | | Senior Housing | | 127,000 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 21,450,000 |
| | 1,783,000 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 14.00 |
|
| Lee’s Summit MO MOB | | Lee’s Summit, MO | | Medical Office | | 39,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 6,750,000 |
| | 1,042,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 26.51 |
|
| Carolina Commons MOB | | Indian Land, SC | | Medical Office | | 58,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 12,000,000 |
| | 1,342,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 83.8 | % | | $ | 27.53 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition(1) | | Location | | Reportable Segment | | GLA (Sq Ft) | | % of GLA | | Contract Purchase Price | | Annualized Base Rent/NOI(2) | | % of Annualized Base Rent | | Leased Percentage(3) | | Average Annual Rent Per Leased Sq Ft(4) |
| Nebraska Senior Housing Portfolio | | Bennington and Omaha, NE | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 282,000 | | 2.1 | % | | $ | 66,000,000 |
| | $ | 3,687,000 |
| | 1.7 | % | | 88.9 | % | | $ | 18,853.39 |
|
| Pennsylvania Senior Housing Portfolio | | Bethlehem, Boyertown and York, PA | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 260,000 | | 2.0 |
| | 87,500,000 |
| | 6,729,000 |
| | 3.1 |
| | 90.7 | % | | $ | 21,378.85 |
|
| Southern Illinois MOB Portfolio | | Waterloo, IL | | Medical Office | | 41,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 12,712,000 |
| | 832,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 88.0 | % | | $ | 22.81 |
|
| Napa Medical Center | | Napa, CA | | Medical Office | | 65,000 | | 0.5 |
| | 15,700,000 |
| | 2,046,000 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 92.6 | % | | $ | 33.92 |
|
| Chesterfield Corporate Plaza | | Chesterfield, MO | | Medical Office | | 226,000 | | 1.7 |
| | 36,000,000 |
| | 4,699,000 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 96.6 | % | | $ | 21.54 |
|
| Richmond VA ALF | | North Chesterfield, VA | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 210,000 | | 1.6 |
| | 64,000,000 |
| | 3,910,000 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 79.0 | % | | $ | 19,325.15 |
|
| Crown Senior Care Portfolio(5) | | Peel, Isle of Man; and Aberdeen, Felixstowe, Salisbury and St. Albans, UK | | Senior Housing | | 155,000 | | 1.2 |
| | 68,085,000 |
| | 4,198,000 |
| | 1.9 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 27.10 |
|
| Washington DC SNF | | Washington, D.C. | | Skilled Nursing | | 134,000 | | 1.0 |
| | 40,000,000 |
| | 4,404,000 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 32.94 |
|
| Trilogy(6) | | IN, KY, MI and OH | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | 7,614,000 | | 57.6 |
| | 1,500,649,000 |
| | 103,416,000 |
| | 47.1 |
| | 84.8 | % | | $ | 11,267.38 |
|
| Stockbridge GA MOB II | | Stockbridge, GA | | Medical Office | | 46,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 8,000,000 |
| | 658,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 78.0 | % | | $ | 18.42 |
|
| Marietta GA MOB II | | Marietta, GA | | Medical Office | | 22,000 | | 0.2 |
| | 5,800,000 |
| | 448,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 97.1 | % | | $ | 21.37 |
|
| Naperville MOB | | Naperville, IL | | Medical Office | | 69,000 | | 0.5 |
| | 17,385,000 |
| | 1,201,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 79.8 | % | | $ | 21.79 |
|
| Lakeview IN Medical Plaza(7) | | Indianapolis, IN | | Medical Office | | 163,000 | | 1.2 |
| | 20,000,000 |
| | 3,211,000 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 92.9 | % | | $ | 21.23 |
|
| Pennsylvania Senior Housing Portfolio II | | Palmyra, PA | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 125,000 | | 0.9 |
| | 27,500,000 |
| | 2,286,000 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 96.5 | % | | $ | 19,747.32 |
|
| Snellville GA MOB | | Snellville, GA | | Medical Office | | 42,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 8,300,000 |
| | 711,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 88.4 | % | | $ | 19.26 |
|
| Lakebrook Medical Center | | Westbrook, CT | | Medical Office | | 25,000 | | 0.2 |
| | 6,150,000 |
| | 497,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 85.4 | % | | $ | 23.66 |
|
| Stockbridge GA MOB III | | Stockbridge, GA | | Medical Office | | 43,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 10,300,000 |
| | 845,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 96.4 | % | | $ | 20.22 |
|
| Joplin MO MOB | | Joplin, MO | | Medical Office | | 85,000 | | 0.6 |
| | 11,600,000 |
| | 1,295,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 96.3 | % | | $ | 15.87 |
|
| Austell GA MOB | | Austell, GA | | Medical Office | | 39,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 12,600,000 |
| | 818,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 91.0 | % | | $ | 22.90 |
|
| Middletown OH MOB | | Middletown, OH | | Medical Office | | 103,000 | | 0.8 |
| | 19,300,000 |
| | 1,724,000 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 82.4 | % | | $ | 20.29 |
|
| Fox Grape SNF Portfolio | | Braintree, Brighton, Duxbury, Hingham, Quincy and Weymouth, MA | | Skilled Nursing | | 424,000 | | 3.2 |
| | 88,000,000 |
| | 7,833,000 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 18.47 |
|
| Voorhees NJ MOB | | Voorhees, NJ | | Medical Office | | 48,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 11,300,000 |
| | 1,025,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 75.9 | % | | $ | 28.14 |
|
| Norwich CT MOB Portfolio | | Norwich, CT | | Medical Office | | 56,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 15,600,000 |
| | 1,287,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 22.88 |
|
| New London CT MOB | | New London, CT | | Medical Office | | 27,000 | | 0.2 |
| | 4,850,000 |
| | 436,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 86.2 | % | | $ | 19.05 |
|
| Middletown OH MOB II | | Middletown, OH | | Medical Office | | 32,000 | | 0.2 |
| | 4,600,000 |
| | 447,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 71.0 | % | | $ | 19.75 |
|
| Total/weighted average(8) | | | | | | 13,251,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 2,940,990,000 |
| | $ | 219,360,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 92.5 | % | | $ | 24.70 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate Investments(1) | | Location | | Reportable Segment | | GLA (Sq Ft) | | % of GLA | | Aggregate Contract Purchase Price | | Annualized Base Rent/NOI(2) | | % of Annualized Base Rent | | Leased Percentage(3) | | Average Annual Rent Per Leased Sq Ft(4) |
| Mount Olympia MOB Portfolio | | Mount Dora, FL; Olympia Fields, IL; and Columbus, OH | | Medical Office | | 53,000 |
| | 0.4 | % | | $ | 16,150,000 |
| | $ | 1,216,000 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 87.8 | % | | $ | 26.33 |
|
| Southlake TX Hospital | | Southlake, TX | | Hospital | | 142,000 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 128,000,000 |
| | 7,322,000 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 51.42 |
|
| East Texas MOB Portfolio | | Longview and Marshall, TX | | Medical Office | | 393,000 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 68,500,000 |
| | 7,626,000 |
| | 3.4 |
| | 97.1 | % | | $ | 19.98 |
|
| Premier MOB | | Novi, MI | | Medical Office | | 45,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 12,025,000 |
| | 996,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 86.7 | % | | $ | 25.63 |
|
| Independence MOB Portfolio | | Southgate, KY; Somerville, MA; Morristown and Verona, NJ; and Bronx, NY | | Medical Office | | 477,000 |
| | 3.5 |
| | 135,000,000 |
| | 13,078,000 |
| | 5.8 |
| | 97.3 | % | | $ | 28.11 |
|
| King of Prussia PA MOB | | King of Prussia, PA | | Medical Office | | 72,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 18,500,000 |
| | 1,438,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 66.5 | % | | $ | 30.02 |
|
| North Carolina ALF Portfolio | | Clemmons, Garner Huntersville, Matthews, Mooresville, Raleigh and Wake Forest, NC | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 272,000 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 113,856,000 |
| | 283,000 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 49.7 | % | | $ | 983.81 |
|
| Orange Star Medical Portfolio | | Durango, CO; and Friendswood, Keller and Wharton, TX | | Medical Office and Hospital | | 183,000 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 57,650,000 |
| | 4,307,000 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 97.5 | % | | $ | 24.21 |
|
| Kingwood MOB Portfolio | | Kingwood, TX | | Medical Office | | 43,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 14,949,000 |
| | 1,209,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 28.41 |
|
| Mt. Juliet TN MOB | | Mount Juliet, TN | | Medical Office | | 46,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 13,000,000 |
| | 712,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 70.0 | % | | $ | 22.23 |
|
| Homewood AL MOB | | Homewood, AL | | Medical Office | | 30,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 7,444,000 |
| | 262,000 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 43.1 | % | | $ | 20.26 |
|
| Paoli PA Medical Plaza | | Paoli, PA | | Medical Office | | 99,000 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 24,820,000 |
| | 1,903,000 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 66.9 | % | | $ | 28.65 |
|
| Glen Burnie MD MOB | | Glen Burnie, MD | | Medical Office | | 77,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 18,650,000 |
| | 1,619,000 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 89.6 | % | | $ | 23.61 |
|
| Marietta GA MOB | | Marietta, GA | | Medical Office | | 41,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 13,050,000 |
| | 988,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 24.20 |
|
| Mountain Crest Senior Housing Portfolio | | Elkhart, Hobart, LaPorte and Mishawaka, IN; and Niles, MI | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 585,000 |
| | 4.2 |
| | 75,035,000 |
| | 3,982,000 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 81.3 | % | | $ | 7,500.06 |
|
| Mount Dora Medical Center | | Mount Dora, FL | | Medical Office | | 51,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 16,300,000 |
| | 322,000 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 25.2 | % | | $ | 24.83 |
|
| Nebraska Senior Housing Portfolio | | Bennington and Omaha, NE | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 282,000 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 66,000,000 |
| | 2,813,000 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 80.6 | % | | $ | 15,863.78 |
|
| Pennsylvania Senior Housing Portfolio | | Bethlehem, Boyertown and York, PA | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 260,000 |
| | 1.9 |
| | 87,500,000 |
| | 6,460,000 |
| | 2.9 |
| | 89.2 | % | | $ | 20,865.57 |
|
| Southern Illinois MOB Portfolio | | Waterloo, IL | | Medical Office | | 41,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 12,712,000 |
| | 874,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 90.7 | % | | $ | 23.23 |
|
| Napa Medical Center | | Napa, CA | | Medical Office | | 65,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 15,700,000 |
| | 1,976,000 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 84.8 | % | | $ | 35.78 |
|
| Chesterfield Corporate Plaza | | Chesterfield, MO | | Medical Office | | 226,000 |
| | 1.6 |
| | 36,000,000 |
| | 4,802,000 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 96.5 | % | | $ | 22.04 |
|
| Richmond VA ALF | | North Chesterfield, VA | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 210,000 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 64,000,000 |
| | 4,471,000 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 95.9 | % | | $ | 25,056.41 |
|
| Crown Senior Care Portfolio(5) | | Peel, Isle of Man; and Aberdeen, Felixstowe, Salisbury and St. Albans, UK | | Senior Housing | | 155,000 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 68,085,000 |
| | 4,514,000 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 29.14 |
|
| Washington DC SNF | | Washington, D.C. | | Skilled Nursing | | 134,000 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 40,000,000 |
| | 4,514,000 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 33.76 |
|
| Trilogy(6) | | IN, KY, MI and OH | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | 8,167,000 |
| | 59.1 |
| | 1,546,121,000 |
| | 114,986,000 |
| | 51.4 |
| | 86.1 | % | | $ | 11,974.08 |
|
| Stockbridge GA MOB II | | Stockbridge, GA | | Medical Office | | 46,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 8,000,000 |
| | 754,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 85.7 | % | | $ | 19.22 |
|
| Marietta GA MOB II | | Marietta, GA | | Medical Office | | 22,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 5,800,000 |
| | 459,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 97.1 | % | | $ | 21.89 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate Investments(1) | | Location | | Reportable Segment | | GLA (Sq Ft) | | % of GLA | | Aggregate Contract Purchase Price | | Annualized Base Rent/NOI(2) | | % of Annualized Base Rent | | Leased Percentage(3) | | Average Annual Rent Per Leased Sq Ft(4) |
| Naperville MOB | | Naperville, IL | | Medical Office | | 69,000 |
| | 0.5 | % | | $ | 17,385,000 |
| | $ | 1,197,000 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 81.7 | % | | $ | 21.24 |
|
| Lakeview IN Medical Plaza(7) | | Indianapolis, IN | | Medical Office | | 163,000 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 20,000,000 |
| | 3,194,000 |
| | 1.4 |
| | 91.3 | % | | $ | 21.49 |
|
Pennsylvania Senior Housing Portfolio II | | Palmyra, PA | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 125,000 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 27,500,000 |
| | 2,234,000 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 97.1 | % | | $ | 19,172.39 |
|
| Snellville GA MOB | | Snellville, GA | | Medical Office | | 42,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 8,300,000 |
| | 693,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 84.0 | % | | $ | 19.76 |
|
| Lakebrook Medical Center | | Westbrook, CT | | Medical Office | | 25,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 6,150,000 |
| | 520,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 88.4 | % | | $ | 23.92 |
|
| Stockbridge GA MOB III | | Stockbridge, GA | | Medical Office | | 43,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 10,300,000 |
| | 871,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 96.4 | % | | $ | 20.85 |
|
| Joplin MO MOB | | Joplin, MO | | Medical Office | | 85,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 11,600,000 |
| | 1,290,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 93.1 | % | | $ | 16.36 |
|
| Austell GA MOB | | Austell, GA | | Medical Office | | 39,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 12,600,000 |
| | 834,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 91.0 | % | | $ | 23.36 |
|
| Middletown OH MOB | | Middletown, OH | | Medical Office | | 103,000 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 19,300,000 |
| | 1,716,000 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 80.8 | % | | $ | 20.59 |
|
| Fox Grape SNF Portfolio | | Braintree, Brighton, Duxbury, Hingham, Quincy and Weymouth, MA | | Skilled Nursing | | 424,000 |
| | 3.1 |
| | 88,000,000 |
| | 7,989,000 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 18.83 |
|
| Voorhees NJ MOB | | Voorhees, NJ | | Medical Office | | 48,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 11,300,000 |
| | 1,051,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 75.9 | % | | $ | 28.85 |
|
| Norwich CT MOB Portfolio | | Norwich, CT | | Medical Office | | 56,000 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 15,600,000 |
| | 1,173,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 98.8 | % | | $ | 21.11 |
|
| New London CT MOB | | New London, CT | | Medical Office | | 27,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 4,850,000 |
| | 526,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 19.81 |
|
| Middletown OH MOB II | | Middletown, OH | | Medical Office | | 32,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 4,600,000 |
| | 451,000 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 71.0 | % | | $ | 19.96 |
|
| Total/weighted average(8) | | | | | | 13,836,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 3,001,462,000 |
| | $ | 223,619,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 91.9 | % | | $ | 35.26 |
|
_______
| |
| (1) | We own 100% of our properties acquired as of December 31, 2018,2019, with the exception of Trilogy and Lakeview IN Medical Plaza. |
| |
| (2) | With the exception of our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses, annualized base rent is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect as of December 31, 2018.2019. Annualized base rent for our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses is based on annualized NOI, a non-GAAP financial measure. See Part II, Item 6, Selected Financial Data, for a further discussion. |
housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses is based on annualized NOI, a non-GAAP financial measure. See Part II, Item 6, Selected Financial Data, for a further discussion.
| |
| (3) | Leased percentage includes all leased space of the respective acquisitionproperty including master leases, except for our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses where leased percentage represents resident occupancy on the available units of the RIDEA facilities or integrated senior health campuses. |
| |
| (4) | Average annual rent per leased square foot is based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2018,2019, except for our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses where average annual rent per unit is based on NOI divided by the average occupied units of the senior housing — RIDEA facilities or integrated senior health campuses. |
| |
| (5) | On September 15, 2015, we purchased our first senior housing facility of Crown Senior Care Portfolio for a net contract purchase price of £6,850,000. On October 8, 2015 and December 8, 2015, we added two additional senior housing facilities to our existing Crown Senior Care Portfolio, for a net contract purchase price of £11,300,000 and £11,100,000, respectively. On November 15, 2016, we added the final threeWe acquired six senior housing facilities comprising Crown Senior Care Portfolio for aan aggregate net contract purchase price of £15,276,000.£44,526,000. |
| |
| (6) | On December 1, 2015, we completed the acquisition of Trilogy, the parent company of Trilogy Health Services, LLC, through our majority-owned subsidiary, Trilogy REIT Holdings, LLC, or Trilogy REIT Holdings. NHI owns a minority interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings. Trilogy REIT Holdings acquired Trilogy for a purchase price based on a total company valuation of approximately $1,125,000,000. Our effective ownership of Trilogy was approximately 67.6% at the time of acquisition. Ouracquisition and our portion of the purchase price for Trilogy was approximately $760,356,000. NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc. and Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc. each currently own a minority interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings. See Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion. Since December 1, 2015, we have expanded the Trilogy portfolio by investing in completed development projects and/orand campus expansions and the acquisition of additional campuses, land parcels for development and a pharmaceutical business through our majority-owned subsidiary, Trilogy Investors, LLC. As of December 31, 2018, our effective ownership in Trilogy was approximately 67.7% |
through our majority-owned subsidiary, Trilogy Investors, LLC. As of December 31, 2019, our effective ownership in Trilogy was approximately 67.6%.
| |
| (7) | On January 21, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Lakeview IN Medical Plaza, pursuant to a joint venture with an affiliate of Cornerstone Companies, Inc., an unaffiliated third party. Our effective ownership of the joint venture is 86.0%. |
| |
| (8) | Weighted average annual rent per leased square foot excludes our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses. |
We own fee simple interests in all of our buildings except for 1117 buildings for which we own fee simple interests in the building and improvements of such properties subject to the respective ground leases.
The following information generally applies to our properties:
we believe all of our properties are adequately covered by insurance and are suitable for their intended purposes;
we have no plans for any material renovations, improvements or development with respect to any of our properties, except in accordance with planned budgets;
our properties are located in markets where we are subject to competition for attracting new tenants and retaining current tenants; and
depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and capital improvements, up to 50 years, over the shorter of the lease term or useful lives of the tenant improvements, up to 34 years, and over the estimated useful life of furniture, fixtures and equipment, up to 2728 years.
For additional information regarding our real estate investments, see Schedule III, Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Lease Expirations
The following table presents the sensitivity of our annual base rent due to lease expirations for the next 10 years and thereafter at our properties other than our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses, by number, total square feet, percentage of leased area, annual base rent and percentage of total annual base rent of expiring leases as of December 31, 2018:2019:
| | | Year | | Number of Expiring Leases | | Total Square Feet of Expiring Leases | | % of Leased Area Represented by Expiring Leases | | Annual Base Rent of Expiring Leases | | % of Total Annual Base Rent Represented by Expiring Leases(1) | | Number of Expiring Leases | | Total Square Feet of Expiring Leases | | % of Leased Area Represented by Expiring Leases | | Annual Base Rent of Expiring Leases | | % of Total Annual Base Rent Represented by Expiring Leases(1) |
| 2019 | | 86 | | 296,000 | | 7.7 | % | | $ | 6,760,000 |
| | 6.0 | % | |
| 2020 | | 63 | | 224,000 | | 5.8 |
| | 5,236,000 |
| | 4.7 |
| | 94 | | 287,000 | | 7.9 | % | | $ | 6,357,000 |
| | 6.1 | % |
| 2021 | | 56 | | 275,000 | | 7.1 |
| | 5,909,000 |
| | 5.3 |
| | 65 | | 290,000 | | 8.0 |
| | 6,270,000 |
| | 6.0 |
|
| 2022 | | 66 | | 395,000 | | 10.3 |
| | 9,548,000 |
| | 8.5 |
| | 68 | | 400,000 | | 11.0 |
| | 9,811,000 |
| | 9.4 |
|
| 2023 | | 52 | | 274,000 | | 7.1 |
| | 7,008,000 |
| | 6.2 |
| | 55 | | 278,000 | | 7.6 |
| | 7,108,000 |
| | 6.8 |
|
| 2024 | | 25 | | 228,000 | | 5.9 |
| | 4,873,000 |
| | 4.3 |
| | 46 | | 318,000 | | 8.7 |
| | 6,912,000 |
| | 6.6 |
|
| 2025 | | 32 | | 342,000 | | 8.9 |
| | 9,605,000 |
| | 8.5 |
| | 22 | | 359,000 | | 9.9 |
| | 10,140,000 |
| | 9.7 |
|
| 2026 | | 9 | | 53,000 | | 1.4 |
| | 1,154,000 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 12 | | 84,000 | | 2.3 |
| | 1,988,000 |
| | 1.9 |
|
| 2027 | | 14 | | 135,000 | | 3.5 |
| | 3,654,000 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 12 | | 133,000 | | 3.7 |
| | 3,592,000 |
| | 3.4 |
|
| 2028 | | 8 | | 148,000 | | 3.8 |
| | 5,815,000 |
| | 5.2 |
| | 7 | | 148,000 | | 4.1 |
| | 5,842,000 |
| | 5.6 |
|
| 2029 | | | 10 | | 288,000 | | 7.9 |
| | 6,573,000 |
| | 6.3 |
|
| Thereafter | | 26 | | 1,483,000 | | 38.5 |
| | 52,976,000 |
| | 47.1 |
| | 30 | | 1,052,000 | | 28.9 |
| | 39,753,000 |
| | 38.1 |
|
| Total | | 437 | | 3,853,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 112,538,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 421 | | 3,637,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 104,346,000 |
| | 100 | % |
_______
| |
| (1) | The annual rent percentage is based on the total annual contractual base rent expiring in the applicable year, based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2018.2019. |
Geographic Diversification/Concentration Table
The following table lists the states in which our properties are located and provides certain information regarding our portfolio’s geographic diversification/concentration as of December 31, 2018:2019:
| | | State | | Number of Buildings/ Campuses | | GLA (Sq Ft) | | % of GLA | | Annualized Base Rent/NOI(1) | | % of Annualized Base Rent/NOI | | Number of Buildings/ Campuses | | GLA (Sq Ft) | | % of GLA | | Annualized Base Rent/NOI(1) | | % of Annualized Base Rent/NOI |
| Alabama | | 1 | | 30,000 | | 0.2 | % | | $ | 125,000 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 1 | | 30,000 | | 0.2 | % | | $ | 262,000 |
| | 0.1 | % |
| Arkansas | | 1 | | 51,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 642,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 1 | | 51,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 661,000 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| California | | 2 | | 65,000 | | 0.5 |
| | 2,046,000 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 2 | | 65,000 | | 0.5 |
| | 1,976,000 |
| | 0.9 |
|
| Colorado | | 2 | | 69,000 | | 0.5 |
| | 2,137,000 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 2 | | 69,000 | | 0.5 |
| | 2,162,000 |
| | 1.0 |
|
| Connecticut | | 4 | | 107,000 | | 0.8 |
| | 2,221,000 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 4 | | 107,000 | | 0.8 |
| | 2,219,000 |
| | 1.0 |
|
| District of Columbia | | 1 | | 134,000 | | 1.0 |
| | 4,404,000 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 1 | | 134,000 | | 1.0 |
| | 4,514,000 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Florida | | 2 | | 62,000 | | 0.5 |
| | 1,314,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 2 | | 62,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 883,000 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Georgia | | 11 | | 307,000 | | 2.3 |
| | 5,400,000 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 11 | | 307,000 | | 2.2 |
| | 5,697,000 |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Illinois | | 6 | | 122,000 | | 0.9 |
| | 2,280,000 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 6 | | 122,000 | | 0.9 |
| | 2,325,000 |
| | 1.0 |
|
| Indiana | | 72 | | 4,931,000 | | 37.2 |
| | 75,719,000 |
| | 34.5 |
| | 75 | | 5,213,000 | | 37.7 |
| | 84,545,000 |
| | 37.8 |
|
| Kansas | | 1 | | 40,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 707,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 1 | | 40,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 729,000 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Kentucky | | 12 | | 906,000 | | 6.8 |
| | 2,649,000 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 12 | | 946,000 | | 6.8 |
| | (838,000 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
| Maryland | | | 1 | | 76,000 | | 0.6 |
| | 1,619,000 |
| | 0.7 |
|
| Massachusetts | | 7 | | 525,000 | | 4.0 |
| | 10,904,000 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 7 | | 525,000 | | 3.8 |
| | 11,319,000 |
| | 5.1 |
|
| Maryland | | 1 | | 77,000 | | 0.6 |
| | 1,612,000 |
| | 0.8 |
| |
| Michigan | | 14 | | 912,000 | | 6.9 |
| | 18,496,000 |
| | 8.4 |
| | 14 | | 913,000 | | 6.6 |
| | 18,461,000 |
| | 8.4 |
|
| Mississippi | | 2 | | 76,000 | | 0.6 |
| | 1,089,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 2 | | 76,000 | | 0.5 |
| | 1,122,000 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| Missouri | | 3 | | 350,000 | | 2.6 |
| | 7,016,000 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 3 | | 350,000 | | 2.5 |
| | 7,134,000 |
| | 3.2 |
|
| North Carolina | | 6 | | 238,000 | | 1.8 |
| | 8,259,000 |
| | 3.8 |
| |
| Nebraska | | 2 | | 282,000 | | 2.1 |
| | 3,687,000 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 2 | | 282,000 | | 2.0 |
| | 2,813,000 |
| | 1.3 |
|
| New Jersey | | 3 | | 278,000 | | 2.1 |
| | 7,270,000 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 3 | | 278,000 | | 2.0 |
| | 7,348,000 |
| | 3.3 |
|
| New York | | 1 | | 91,000 | | 0.7 |
| | 2,714,000 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 1 | | 91,000 | | 0.7 |
| | 2,776,000 |
| | 1.2 |
|
| North Carolina | | | 7 | | 272,000 | | 2.0 |
| | 283,000 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Ohio | | 27 | | 1,880,000 | | 14.3 |
| | 18,014,000 |
| | 8.2 |
| | 30 | | 2,110,000 | | 15.3 |
| | 24,233,000 |
| | 10.8 |
|
| Pennsylvania | | 8 | | 557,000 | | 4.2 |
| | 12,584,000 |
| | 5.7 |
| | 8 | | 556,000 | | 4.0 |
| | 12,035,000 |
| | 5.4 |
|
| South Carolina | | 1 | | 58,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 1,401,000 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1 | | 58,000 | | 0.4 |
| | 1,342,000 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Tennessee | | 1 | | 46,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 711,000 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 1 | | 46,000 | | 0.3 |
| | 712,000 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Texas | | 15 | | 692,000 | | 5.2 |
| | 17,851,000 |
| | 8.1 |
| | 15 | | 692,000 | | 5.0 |
| | 18,302,000 |
| | 8.2 |
|
| Virginia | | 1 | | 210,000 | | 1.6 |
| | 3,910,000 |
| | 1.8 |
| | 1 | | 210,000 | | 1.5 |
| | 4,471,000 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Total Domestic | | 207 | | 13,096,000 | | 98.8 |
| | 215,162,000 |
| | 98.1 |
| | 214 | | 13,681,000 | | 98.9 |
| | 219,105,000 |
| | 98.0 |
|
| Isle of Man and UK | | 6 | | 155,000 | | 1.2 |
| | 4,198,000 |
| | 1.9 |
| | 6 | | 155,000 | | 1.1 |
| | 4,514,000 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Total | | 213 | | 13,251,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 219,360,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 220 | | 13,836,000 | | 100 | % | | $ | 223,619,000 |
| | 100 | % |
_______
| |
| (1) | Annualized base rent is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect as of December 31, 2018,2019, with the exception of our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses, which are based on annualized NOI. |
Indebtedness
For a discussion of our indebtedness, see Note 7, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, and Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market Information
There is no established public trading market for shares of our common stock.
To assist the members of FINRA and their associated persons, pursuant to FINRA Conduct Rule 5110, we disclose in each annual report distributed to stockholders a per share estimated value of the shares, the method by which it was developed, and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. In addition, we prepare annual statements of the estimated share value to assist fiduciaries of Benefit Plans and IRAs subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA in the preparation of their reports relating to an investment in shares of our common stock. For these purposes, our most recentupdated estimated per share NAV was $9.37is $9.40 calculated as of June 30, 2018,2019, an increase from our previously determined estimated per share NAV of $9.27$9.37 calculated as of June 30, 2017 and approved by our board on October 4, 2017.2018. The most recentupdated estimated per share NAV of $9.37$9.40 was approved and established by our board on October 3, 20182019 based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of June 30, 2018.2019. However, there is no established public trading market for the shares of our common stock at this time, and there can be no assurance that stockholders could receive $9.37$9.40 per share if such a market did exist and they sold their shares of our common stock or that they would be able to receive such amount for their shares of our common stock in the future.
Pursuant to FINRA rules, we disclose an estimated per share NAV of our shares based on a valuation performed at least annually, and we disclose the resulting estimated per share NAV in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K distributed to stockholders. When determining the estimated value per share NAV, there are currently no SEC, federal and state rules that establish requirements specifying the methodology to employ in determining an estimated per share NAV; provided, however, that the determination of the estimated per share NAV must be conducted by, or with the material assistance or confirmation of, a third-party valuation expert or service and must be derived from a methodology that conforms to standard industry practice. In determining the most recentupdated estimated per share NAV of our shares, our board considered information and analysis, including valuation materials that were provided by an independent third-party valuation firm, information provided by our advisor and the estimated per share NAV recommendation made by the audit committee of our board, which committee is comprised entirely of independent directors. See our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 4, 2018,2019, for additional information regarding our independent third-party valuation firm, its valuation materials and the methodology used to determine the most recentupdated estimated per share NAV.
Although FINRA rules require subsequent valuations to be performed at least annually, our board may decide to perform them on a quarterly basis.annually. The valuations are estimates and consequently should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the fair value of our investments nor do they represent the amount of net proceeds that would result from an immediate sale of our assets.
Stockholders
As of March 15, 2019,20, 2020, we had approximately 36,15135,454 stockholders of record.
Distributions
Our board has authorized, on a quarterly basis, a daily distribution to our stockholders of record as of the close of business on each day of the quarterly periods commencing onJuly 1, May 14, 2014 and ending on June 30, 2019.March 31, 2020. The distributions were or will be calculated based on 365 days in the calendar year and are equal to $0.001643836 per share of our common stock, which is equal to an annualized distribution of $0.60 per share. The daily distributions were or will be aggregated and paid monthly in arrears in cash or shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings, only from legally available funds.
The amount of the distributions paid to our stockholders is determined quarterly by our board and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for payment of distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code. We have not established any limit on the amount of offering proceeds that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (i) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business or (ii) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences.
The distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to the 2015our DRIP Offering,Offerings, and the sources of our distributions as compared to cash flows from operations were as follows:
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Distributions paid in cash | $ | 59,974,000 |
| | | | $ | 55,777,000 |
| | | $ | 62,612,000 |
| | | | $ | 59,974,000 |
| | |
| Distributions reinvested | 60,030,000 |
| | | | 63,008,000 |
| | | 55,440,000 |
| | | | 60,030,000 |
| | |
| | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | | $ | 118,052,000 |
| | | | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | |
| Sources of distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash flows from operations | $ | 106,814,000 |
| | 89.0 | % | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 117,454,000 |
| | 99.5 | % | | $ | 106,814,000 |
| | 89.0 | % |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 13,190,000 |
| | 11.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 598,000 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 13,190,000 |
| | 11.0 |
|
| | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 118,052,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | 100 | % |
Under GAAP, certain acquisition related expenses, such as expenses incurred in connection with property acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, are expensed, and therefore, are subtracted from cash flows from operations. However, these expenses may be paid from debt.
AnyAs of December 31, 2019, any distributions of amounts in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits have resulted in a return of capital to our stockholders, and all or any portion of a distribution to our stockholders may have been paid from net offering proceeds and borrowings. The payment of distributions from our initialnet offering proceeds and borrowings could have reduced the amount of capital we ultimately invested in assets and negatively impacted the amount of income available for future distributions.
As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had an amount payable of $1,977,000$2,146,000 to our advisor or its affiliates primarily for asset and property management fees, which will be paid from cash flows from operations in the future as it becomes due and payable by us in the ordinary course of business consistent with our past practice.
As of December 31, 2018, no amounts due to our advisor or its affiliates had been deferred, waived or forgiven other than $37,000 in asset management fees waived by our advisor in 2014, which was equal to the amount of distributions payable to our stockholders for the period from May 14, 2014, the date we received and accepted subscriptions aggregating at least the minimum offering of $2,000,000 required pursuant to our initial offering, through June 5, 2014, the date we acquired our first property. In addition, our advisor agreed to waive the disposition fees that may otherwise have been due to our advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement for the dispositions of investments within our integrated senior health campuses segment in 2017. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net — Dispositions of Real Estate Investments, and Note 14, Related Party Transactions — LiquidityOperational Stage, — Dispositions Fees, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion. Our advisor did not receive any additional securities, shares of our stock, or any other form of consideration or any repayment as a result of the waiver of such asset management fees and disposition fees. Other than the waiver of such asset management fees in 2014 and disposition fees in 2017 by our advisor discussed above, our advisor and its affiliates, including our co-sponsors, have no obligation to defer or forgive fees owed by us to our advisor or its affiliates or to advance any funds to us. In the future, if our advisor or its affiliates do not defer, waive or forgive amounts due to them, this would negatively affect our cash flows from operations, which could result in us paying distributions, or a portion thereof, using borrowed funds. As a result, the amount of proceeds from borrowings available for investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.
10-K.
The distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, along with the amount of distributions reinvested pursuant to the 2015our DRIP Offering,Offerings, and the sources of our distributions as compared to FFO were as follows:
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Distributions paid in cash | $ | 59,974,000 |
| | | | $ | 55,777,000 |
| | | $ | 62,612,000 |
| | | | $ | 59,974,000 |
| | |
| Distributions reinvested | 60,030,000 |
| | | | 63,008,000 |
| | | 55,440,000 |
| | | | 60,030,000 |
| | |
| | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | | $ | 118,052,000 |
| | | | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | |
| Sources of distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FFO attributable to controlling interest | $ | 96,958,000 |
| | 80.8 | % | | $ | 113,464,000 |
| | 95.5 | % | $ | 91,159,000 |
| | 77.2 | % | | $ | 96,958,000 |
| | 80.8 | % |
| Proceeds from borrowings | 23,046,000 |
| | 19.2 |
| | 5,321,000 |
| | 4.5 |
| 26,893,000 |
| | 22.8 |
| | 23,046,000 |
| | 19.2 |
|
| | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 118,785,000 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 118,052,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 120,004,000 |
| | 100 | % |
The payment of distributions from sources other than FFO may reduce the amount of proceeds available for investment and operations or cause us to incur additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds. For a further discussion of FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, including a reconciliation of our GAAP net income (loss) to FFO, see Item 6, Selected Financial Data.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
We adopted our incentive plan, pursuant to which our board or a committee of our independent directors may make grants of options, shares of our restricted common stock, stock purchase rights, stock appreciation rights or other awards to our independent directors, employees and consultants. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to our incentive plan is 2,000,000 shares. For a further discussion of our incentive plan, see Note 13, Equity — 2013 Incentive Plan, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following table provides information regarding our incentive plan as of December 31, 2018:2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Plan Category | | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | | — |
| | — |
| | 1,895,0001,872,500 |
|
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | | — |
| | | | 1,895,0001,872,500 |
|
________
| |
| (1) | Through December 31, 2018,2019, we granted an aggregate of 45,00052,500 shares of our restricted common stock, as defined in our incentive plan, to our independent directors in connection with their initial election or re-election to our board, of which 20.0% vested on the grant date and 20.0% will vest on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. In addition, through December 31, 2018,2019, we granted an aggregate of 60,00075,000 shares of our restricted common stock, as defined in our incentive plan, to our independent directors in consideration for their past services rendered. These shares of restricted common stock vest under the same period described above. Prior to October 5, 2016, the fair value of each share at the date of grant was estimated at $10.00 based on the then most recent price paid to acquire aone share of our common stock in our initial offering; effective October 5, 2016, the fair value of each share at the date of grant was estimated at the most recentupdated estimated per share NAV approved and established by our board; and with respect to the initial 20.0% of shares of our restricted common stock that vested on the date of grant, expensed as compensation immediately, and with respect to the remaining shares of our restricted common stock, amortized over the period from the service inception date to the vesting date for each vesting tranche (i.e., on a tranche by tranche basis) using the accelerated attribution method. Shares of our restricted common stock may not be sold, transferred, exchanged, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered. Such restrictions expire upon vesting. Shares of our restricted common stock have full voting rights and rights to distributions. Such shares are not shown in the chart above as they are deemed outstanding shares of our common stock; however, such grants reduce the number of securities remaining available for future issuance. |
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Our share repurchase plan allows for repurchases of shares of our common stock by us when certain criteria are met. Share repurchases will be made at the sole discretion of our board. All share repurchases are subject to a one-year holding period, except for repurchases made in connection with a stockholder’s death or “qualifying disability,” as defined in our share repurchase plan, and will be repurchased at a price between 92.5% and 100% of each stockholder’s “Repurchase Amount,” as defined in our share repurchase plan, depending on the period of time their shares have been held. The numbersnumber of shares that we will repurchase is generally limited during any calendar year to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock will come exclusively from the cumulative proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings. Additionally, effective with respect to share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter 2019, the number of shares that we will repurchase during any fiscal quarter will be limited to an amount equal to the net proceeds that we received from the sale of shares issued pursuant to theour DRIP Offerings during the immediately preceding completed fiscal quarter; provided however, that shares subject to a repurchase requested upon the death or qualifying disability of a stockholder will not be subject to this quarterly cap or to our existing cap on repurchases to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the calendar year prior to the repurchase date. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock will come from the cumulative proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings. Furthermore, our share repurchase plan, as amended, provides that if there are insufficient funds to honor all repurchase requests, pending requests may be honored among all requests for repurchase in any given repurchase period as follows: first, repurchases in full as to repurchases that would result in a stockholder owning less than $2,500 of shares; and, next, pro rata as to other repurchase requests.
Effective with respect to share repurchase requests submitted during the fourth quarter 2016, the Repurchase Amount is equal to the lesser of (i) the amount per share that a stockholder paid for their shares of our common stock, or (ii) the most recent estimated value of one share of our common stock, as determined by our board. Accordingly, we repurchase shares as follows: (a) for stockholders who have continuously held their shares of our common stock for at least one year, the price will be 92.5% of the Repurchase Amount; (b) for stockholders who have continuously held their shares of our common stock for at least two years, the price will be 95.0% of the Repurchase Amount; (c) for stockholders who have continuously held their shares of our common stock for at least three years, the price will be 97.5% of the Repurchase Amount; (d) for stockholders who have held their shares of our common stock for at least four years, the price will be 100% of the Repurchase Amount; and (e) for requests submitted pursuant to a death or a qualifying disability, the repurchase price will be 100% of the amount per share the stockholder paid for their shares of common stock (in each case, as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock).
During the three months ended December 31, 2018,2019, we repurchased shares of our common stock as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program | | Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
| October 1, 2018 to October 31, 2018 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) |
| November 1, 2018 to November 30, 2018 | | 4,583 |
| | $ | 9.26 |
| | 4,583 |
| | (1 | ) |
| December 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 | | 2,503,280 |
| | $ | 9.36 |
| | 2,503,280 |
| | (1 | ) |
| Total | | 2,507,863 |
| | $ | 9.36 |
| | 2,507,863 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program | | Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
| October 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) |
| November 1, 2019 to November 30, 2019 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) |
| December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 | | 1,843,110 |
| | $ | 9.46 |
| | 1,843,110 |
| | (1 | ) |
| Total | | 1,843,110 |
| | $ | 9.46 |
| | 1,843,110 |
| | |
___________
| |
| (1) | Subject to funds being available, we will limitA description of the maximum number of shares ofthat may be purchased under our common stock repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% ofshare repurchase plan is included in the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year; provided however, shares of our common stock subject to a repurchase requested upon the death or a qualifying disability of a stockholder will not be subject tonarrative preceding this cap.table. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014.2015. This table should be read with Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors and Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period.
On January 1, 2019, we adopted ASC Topic 842, Leases, using the modified retrospective approach whereby the cumulative effect of adoption was recognized on the adoption date and prior periods were not restated. As such, with respect to our leases as both lessees and lessors, certain financial information below is presented pursuant to ASC Topic 842 for the year ended December 31, 2019, and pursuant to the lease accounting standard then in effect for the prior years. Therefore, our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 may not be comparable to the prior years presented below. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Leases, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of ASC Topic 842.
The following selected financial data is derived from our consolidated financial statements in Part IV, Item 15, Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules that is a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | | | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| Selected Financial Data | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| BALANCE SHEET DATA: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | | $ | 2,889,092,000 |
| | $ | 2,800,475,000 |
| | $ | 2,794,518,000 |
| | $ | 2,525,019,000 |
| | $ | 831,467,000 |
| | $ | 3,172,289,000 |
| | $ | 2,889,092,000 |
| | $ | 2,800,475,000 |
| | $ | 2,794,518,000 |
| | $ | 2,525,019,000 |
|
| Mortgage loans payable, net | | $ | 688,262,000 |
| | $ | 613,558,000 |
| | $ | 495,717,000 |
| | $ | 295,270,000 |
| | $ | 16,742,000 |
| | $ | 792,870,000 |
| | $ | 688,262,000 |
| | $ | 613,558,000 |
| | $ | 495,717,000 |
| | $ | 295,270,000 |
|
| Lines of credit and term loans | | $ | 738,048,000 |
| | $ | 624,125,000 |
| | $ | 649,317,000 |
| | $ | 350,000,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 815,879,000 |
| | $ | 738,048,000 |
| | $ | 624,125,000 |
| | $ | 649,317,000 |
| | $ | 350,000,000 |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | | $ | 1,060,507,000 |
| | $ | 1,187,850,000 |
| | $ | 1,262,790,000 |
| | $ | 1,492,113,000 |
| | $ | 805,534,000 |
| | $ | 900,555,000 |
| | $ | 1,060,507,000 |
| | $ | 1,187,850,000 |
| | $ | 1,262,790,000 |
| | $ | 1,492,113,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | | $ | 1,135,260,000 |
| | $ | 1,054,292,000 |
| | $ | 989,571,000 |
| | $ | 160,476,000 |
| | $ | 3,481,000 |
| | $ | 1,223,116,000 |
| | $ | 1,135,260,000 |
| | $ | 1,054,292,000 |
| | $ | 989,571,000 |
| | $ | 160,476,000 |
|
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
| | $ | (203,896,000 | ) | | $ | (115,041,000 | ) | | $ | (8,598,000 | ) | |
| Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest | | $ | 13,297,000 |
| | $ | 11,222,000 |
| | $ | (146,034,000 | ) | | $ | (101,333,000 | ) | | $ | (8,598,000 | ) | |
| Net income (loss) per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted(1) | | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | (0.75 | ) | | $ | (0.55 | ) | | $ | (0.66 | ) | |
| Net (loss) income | | | $ | (852,000 | ) | | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
| | $ | (203,896,000 | ) | | $ | (115,041,000 | ) |
| Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest | | | $ | (4,965,000 | ) | | $ | 13,297,000 |
| | $ | 11,222,000 |
| | $ | (146,034,000 | ) | | $ | (101,333,000 | ) |
| Net (loss) income per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted(1) | | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | (0.75 | ) | | $ | (0.55 | ) |
| STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS DATA: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | $ | 106,814,000 |
| | $ | 128,103,000 |
| | $ | 114,357,000 |
| | $ | (22,987,000 | ) | | $ | (6,329,000 | ) | | $ | 117,454,000 |
| | $ | 106,814,000 |
| | $ | 128,103,000 |
| | $ | 114,357,000 |
| | $ | (22,987,000 | ) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | | $ | (135,772,000 | ) | | $ | (124,551,000 | ) | | $ | (352,687,000 | ) | | $ | (1,591,056,000 | ) | | $ | (265,470,000 | ) | | $ | (103,112,000 | ) | | $ | (135,772,000 | ) | | $ | (124,551,000 | ) | | $ | (352,687,000 | ) | | $ | (1,591,056,000 | ) |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | | $ | 37,597,000 |
| | $ | 4,765,000 |
| | $ | 226,656,000 |
| | $ | 1,176,599,000 |
| | $ | 776,736,000 |
| | $ | 2,688,000 |
| | $ | 37,597,000 |
| | $ | 4,765,000 |
| | $ | 226,656,000 |
| | $ | 1,176,599,000 |
|
| OTHER DATA: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Distributions declared | | $ | 120,001,000 |
| | $ | 118,968,000 |
| | $ | 116,549,000 |
| | $ | 109,957,000 |
| | $ | 7,827,000 |
| | $ | 117,837,000 |
| | $ | 120,001,000 |
| | $ | 118,968,000 |
| | $ | 116,549,000 |
| | $ | 109,957,000 |
|
| Distributions declared per share | | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
|
| FFO attributable to controlling interest(2) | | $ | 96,958,000 |
| | $ | 113,464,000 |
| | $ | 62,915,000 |
| | $ | (30,815,000 | ) | | $ | (7,088,000 | ) | | $ | 91,159,000 |
| | $ | 96,958,000 |
| | $ | 113,464,000 |
| | $ | 62,915,000 |
| | $ | (30,815,000 | ) |
| MFFO attributable to controlling interest(2) | | $ | 94,677,000 |
| | $ | 102,272,000 |
| | $ | 96,528,000 |
| | $ | 37,241,000 |
| | $ | 985,000 |
| | $ | 96,703,000 |
| | $ | 94,677,000 |
| | $ | 102,272,000 |
| | $ | 96,528,000 |
| | $ | 37,241,000 |
|
| Net operating income(3) | | $ | 211,366,000 |
| | $ | 214,778,000 |
| | $ | 195,038,000 |
| | $ | 60,146,000 |
| | $ | 2,582,000 |
| | $ | 221,397,000 |
| | $ | 211,366,000 |
| | $ | 214,778,000 |
| | $ | 195,038,000 |
| | $ | 60,146,000 |
|
_________
| |
| (1) | Net income (loss) per common share is based upon the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding. Distributions by us of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes are taxable to stockholders as ordinary income. Distributions in excess of these earnings and profits generally are treated as a non-taxable reduction of the stockholders’ basis in the shares of our common stock to the extent thereof (a return of capital for tax purposes) and, thereafter, as taxable gain. These distributions in excess of earnings and profits will have the effect of deferring taxation of the distributions until the sale of the stockholders’ common stock. |
| |
| (2) | Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations: |
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, a non-GAAP measure, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of funds from operations is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure, and our management uses FFO to evaluate our performance over time. FFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP.
We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on funds from operations approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004, or the White Paper. The White Paper defines funds from operations as net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of propertycertain real estate assets and asset impairment writedowns of certain real estate assets and investments, plus depreciation and amortization related to real estate, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect funds from operations. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.
The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, which is the case if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or as requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. In addition, we believe it is appropriate to exclude impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions, which can change over time. Testing for an impairment of an asset is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly basis. If certain impairment indications exist in an asset, and if the asset’s carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset, an impairment charge would be recognized. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and that we intend to have a relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges through the eventual sale of the property. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect funds from operations. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.
Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate relatedestate-related depreciation and amortization and impairments, provides a further understanding of our performance to investors and to our management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income (loss).
However, FFO and MFFO as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income (loss) or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.
Changes in the accounting and reporting rules under GAAP that were put into effect and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses, as items that are expensed as operating expenses under GAAP. We believe these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that publicly registered, non-listed REITs are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after the acquisition activity ceases. We have used the proceeds raised in our initial offering to acquire properties, and we intend to begin the process of achieving a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange, a merger or sale, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or another similar transaction) within five years after the completion of our offering stage, which is generally comparable to other publicly registered, non-listed REITs. Thus, we do not intend to continuously purchase assets and intend to have a limited life. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, theThe IPA, an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as modified funds from operations, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental performance measure for publicly registered, non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental performance measure to reflect the operating performance of a publicly registered, non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that, because MFFO excludes expensed acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired and that we consider more reflective of investing activities, as well as other non-operating items included in FFO, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring our properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating
performance after our offering stage has been completed and our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the publicly registered, non-listed REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering stage and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering stage has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes expensed acquisition fees and expenses that have a negative effect on our operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.
We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations, or the Practice Guideline issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines modified funds from operations as funds from operations further adjusted for the following items included in the determination of GAAP net income (loss): acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent and amortization of above- and below-market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to closer to an expected to be received cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income (loss); gains or losses included in net income (loss) from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan; unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting; and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect modified funds from operations on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income (loss) in calculating cash flows from operations and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized. We are responsible for managing interest
rate, hedge and foreign exchange risk, and we do not rely on another party to manage such risk. In as much as interest rate hedges will not be a fundamental part of our operations, we believe it is appropriate to exclude such gains and losses in calculating MFFO, as such gains and losses are based on market fluctuations and may not be directly related or attributable to our operations.
Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition related expenses (which include gains or losses on contingent consideration), amortization of above- and below-market leases, amortization of loan and closing costs, change in deferred rent, gains or losses from the early extinguishment of debt, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, gains or losses on foreign currency transactions, fair value adjustment to investments in unconsolidated entities and the adjustments of such items related to unconsolidated entities and noncontrolling interests. The other adjustments included in the IPA’s Practice Guideline are not applicable to us for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014. Certain acquisition related expenses under GAAP, such as expenses incurred in connection with property acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, are considered operating expenses and as expenses includedperiods presented in the determination of net income (loss), which is a performance measure under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. By excluding expensed acquisition fees and expenses, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the properties. table below.
Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income (loss) in determining cash flows from operations. We view fair value adjustments of derivatives and gains and losses from dispositions of assets as items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized or as items which are not reflective of on-going operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance. By excluding such charges that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.
Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other publicly registered, non-listed REITs which intend to have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to publicly registered, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence, that the use of such measures may be useful to investors.
Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate funds from operations and modified funds from operations the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations, which is an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with other measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO may be useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete. FFO and MFFO are not useful measures in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining FFO and MFFO.
Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the publicly registered, non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss), which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to FFO and MFFO for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014:periods presented below:
| | | | | Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
| | $ | (203,896,000 | ) | | $ | (115,041,000 | ) | | $ | (8,598,000 | ) | |
| Net (loss) income | | | $ | (852,000 | ) | | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
| | $ | (203,896,000 | ) | | $ | (115,041,000 | ) |
| Add: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization — consolidated properties | | 95,678,000 |
| | 113,226,000 |
| | 271,307,000 |
| | 75,714,000 |
| | 1,510,000 |
| |
| Depreciation and amortization — unconsolidated entities | | 1,085,000 |
| | 1,075,000 |
| | 1,061,000 |
| | 75,000 |
| | — |
| |
| Depreciation and amortization related to real estate — consolidated properties | | | 111,412,000 |
| | 95,678,000 |
| | 113,226,000 |
| | 271,307,000 |
| | 75,714,000 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization related to real estate — unconsolidated entities | | | 1,189,000 |
| | 1,085,000 |
| | 1,075,000 |
| | 1,061,000 |
| | 75,000 |
|
| Impairment of real estate investments | | 2,542,000 |
| | 14,070,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,542,000 |
| | 14,070,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Less: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests and noncontrolling interests | | (1,240,000 | ) | | 5,872,000 |
| | 57,862,000 |
| | 13,708,000 |
| | — |
| | (4,113,000 | ) | | (1,240,000 | ) | | 5,872,000 |
| | 57,862,000 |
| | 13,708,000 |
|
| Less: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gain on dispositions of real estate investments | | — |
| | (3,370,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,370,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Depreciation, amortization, impairments and gain on dispositions related to redeemable noncontrolling interests and noncontrolling interests | | (15,644,000 | ) | | (22,759,000 | ) | | (63,419,000 | ) | | (5,271,000 | ) | | — |
| | (16,477,000 | ) | | (15,644,000 | ) | | (22,759,000 | ) | | (63,419,000 | ) | | (5,271,000 | ) |
| FFO attributable to controlling interest | | $ | 96,958,000 |
| | $ | 113,464,000 |
| | $ | 62,915,000 |
| | $ | (30,815,000 | ) | | $ | (7,088,000 | ) | | $ | 91,159,000 |
| | $ | 96,958,000 |
| | $ | 113,464,000 |
| | $ | 62,915,000 |
| | $ | (30,815,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition related expenses(a) | | $ | (2,913,000 | ) | | $ | (3,833,000 | ) | | $ | 28,589,000 |
| | $ | 74,170,000 |
| | $ | 8,199,000 |
| | $ | (161,000 | ) | | $ | (2,913,000 | ) | | $ | (3,833,000 | ) | | $ | 28,589,000 |
| | $ | 74,170,000 |
|
| Amortization of above- and below-market leases(b) | | 450,000 |
| | 710,000 |
| | 929,000 |
| | 882,000 |
| | 114,000 |
| | 219,000 |
| | 450,000 |
| | 710,000 |
| | 929,000 |
| | 882,000 |
|
| Amortization of loan and closing costs(c) | | 251,000 |
| | 223,000 |
| | 754,000 |
| | 669,000 |
| | — |
| | 275,000 |
| | 251,000 |
| | 223,000 |
| | 754,000 |
| | 669,000 |
|
| Change in deferred rent(d) | | (4,841,000 | ) | | (5,289,000 | ) | | (10,733,000 | ) | | (2,816,000 | ) | | (240,000 | ) | | 744,000 |
| | (4,841,000 | ) | | (5,289,000 | ) | | (10,733,000 | ) | | (2,816,000 | ) |
| Loss on extinguishment of mortgage loan payable(e) | | — |
| | 1,432,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt(e) | | | 2,968,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,432,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Loss (gain) in fair value of derivative financial instruments(f) | | 1,949,000 |
| | (383,000 | ) | | (1,968,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 4,541,000 |
| | 1,949,000 |
| | (383,000 | ) | | (1,968,000 | ) | | — |
|
| Foreign currency loss (gain)(g) | | 2,690,000 |
| | (4,045,000 | ) | | 8,755,000 |
| | 3,199,000 |
| | — |
| |
| Foreign currency (gain) loss(g) | | | (1,730,000 | ) | | 2,690,000 |
| | (4,045,000 | ) | | 8,755,000 |
| | 3,199,000 |
|
| Fair value adjustment to investments in unconsolidated entities(h) | | — |
| | — |
| | 9,101,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,101,000 |
| | — |
|
| Adjustments for unconsolidated entities(i) | | 1,645,000 |
| | 1,981,000 |
| | 2,140,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,431,000 |
| | 1,645,000 |
| | 1,981,000 |
| | 2,140,000 |
| | — |
|
| Adjustments for redeemable noncontrolling interests and noncontrolling interests(i) | | (1,512,000 | ) | | (1,988,000 | ) | | (3,954,000 | ) | | (8,048,000 | ) | | — |
| | (2,743,000 | ) | | (1,512,000 | ) | | (1,988,000 | ) | | (3,954,000 | ) | | (8,048,000 | ) |
| MFFO attributable to controlling interest | | $ | 94,677,000 |
| | $ | 102,272,000 |
| | $ | 96,528,000 |
| | $ | 37,241,000 |
| | $ | 985,000 |
| | $ | 96,703,000 |
| | $ | 94,677,000 |
| | $ | 102,272,000 |
| | $ | 96,528,000 |
| | $ | 37,241,000 |
|
| Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | | 199,953,936 |
| | 198,234,677 |
| | 194,199,931 |
| | 183,234,601 |
| | 13,052,785 |
| | 196,342,873 |
| | 199,953,936 |
| | 198,234,677 |
| | 194,199,931 |
| | 183,234,601 |
|
| Net income (loss) per common share — basic and diluted | | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | (1.05 | ) | | $ | (0.63 | ) | | $ | (0.66 | ) | |
| Net (loss) income per common share — basic and diluted | | | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | (1.05 | ) | | $ | (0.63 | ) |
| FFO attributable to controlling interest per common share — basic and diluted | | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.32 |
| | $ | (0.17 | ) | | $ | (0.54 | ) | | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.32 |
| | $ | (0.17 | ) |
| MFFO attributable to controlling interest per common share — basic and diluted | | $ | 0.47 |
| | $ | 0.52 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.47 |
| | $ | 0.52 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
|
_________
| |
| (a) | In evaluating investments in real estate, we differentiate the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. Such information would be comparable only for publicly registered, non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activity and have other similar operating characteristics. By excluding expensed acquisition related expenses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our advisor or its affiliates and third parties. |
| |
| (b) | Under GAAP, above- and below-market leases are assumed to diminish predictably in value over time and amortized, similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate related assets that are excluded from FFO. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, we believe that by excluding charges relating to the amortization of above- and below-market leases, MFFO may provide useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate. |
| |
| (c) | Under GAAP, direct loan and closing costs are amortized over the term of our notes receivable and debt security investment and notes receivable as an adjustment to the yield on our notes receivable or debt security investment.investment or notes receivable. This may result in income recognition that is different than the contractual cash flows under our notes receivable and debt security investment.investment and notes receivable. By adjusting for the amortization of the loan and closing costs related to our debt security investment and real estate notes receivable, and debt security investment, MFFO may provide useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of our notes receivable and debt security investment and notes receivable terms, providing insight on the expected contractual cash flows of such notes receivable and debt security investment and notes receivable, and aligns results with our analysis of operating performance. |
| |
| (d) | Under GAAP, as a lessor, rental revenue or rental expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related lease (including rent holidays). As a lessee, we record amortization of right-of-use assets and accretion of lease liabilities for our operating leases. This may result in income or expense recognition that is significantly different than the underlying contract terms. By adjusting for the change in deferred rent,such amounts, MFFO may provide useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms, providing insight on the expected contractual cash flows of such lease terms, and aligns results with our analysis of operating performance. |
| |
| (e) | The loss associated with the early extinguishment of debt primarily includes the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees, as well as expenses,write-off of unamortized debt discount, penalties, or other fees incurred. We believe that adjusting for such non-recurring losses provides useful supplemental information because such charges (or losses) may not be reflective of on-going business transactions and operations and is consistent with management’s analysis of our operating performance. |
| |
| (f) | Under GAAP, we are required to recordinclude changes in fair value of our derivative financial instruments at fair value at each reporting period.in the determination of net income or loss. We believe that adjusting for the change in fair value of our derivative financial instruments to arrive at MFFO is appropriate because such adjustments may not be reflective of on-going operations and reflect unrealized impacts on value based only on then current market conditions, although they may be based upon general market conditions. The need to reflect the change in fair value of our derivative financial instruments is a continuous process and is analyzed on a quarterly basis in accordance with GAAP. |
| |
| (g) | We believe that adjusting for the change in foreign currency exchange rates provides useful information because such adjustments may not be reflective of on-going operations. |
| |
| (h) | Includes impairment of one of our investments in unconsolidated entities, which resulted from a measurable decrease in the fair value of the real estate operations of such entity. |
| |
| (i) | Includes all adjustments to eliminate the unconsolidated entities’ share or redeemable noncontrolling interests and noncontrolling interests’ share, as applicable, of the adjustments described in notes (a) – (h) above to convert our FFO to MFFO. |
NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP, generated from properties before general and administrative expenses, acquisition related expenses, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, gain or loss on dispositions, impairment of real estate investments, loss from unconsolidated entities, foreign currency gain or loss, other income and income tax benefit (expense). Certain acquisition related expenses under GAAP, such as expenses incurred in connection with property acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income (loss), which is a performance measure under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property.
NOI is not equivalent to our net income (loss) as determined under GAAP and may not be a useful measure in measuring operational income or cash flows. Furthermore, NOI is not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations, which isas an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. NOI should not be construed to be more
relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income (loss) or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. Investors are also cautioned that NOI should only be used to assess our operational performance in periods in which we have not incurred or accrued any acquisition related expenses.
We believe that NOI is an appropriate supplemental performance measure to reflect the operating performance of our operating assets because NOI excludes certain items that are not associated with the management of the properties. We believe that NOI is a widely accepted measure of comparative operating performance in the real estate community. However, our use of the term NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies as they may have different methodologies for computing this amount.
TheTo facilitate understanding of this financial measure, the following is a reconciliation of net income (loss), which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to net operating incomeNOI for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014:periods presented below:
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
| | $ | (203,896,000 | ) | | $ | (115,041,000 | ) | | $ | (8,598,000 | ) | |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (852,000 | ) | | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
| | $ | (203,896,000 | ) | | $ | (115,041,000 | ) |
| General and administrative | 28,770,000 |
| | 32,587,000 |
| | 28,951,000 |
| | 16,544,000 |
| | 1,238,000 |
| 29,749,000 |
| | 28,770,000 |
| | 32,587,000 |
| | 28,951,000 |
| | 16,544,000 |
|
| Acquisition related expenses | (2,913,000 | ) | | (3,833,000 | ) | | 28,589,000 |
| | 74,170,000 |
| | 8,199,000 |
| (161,000 | ) | | (2,913,000 | ) | | (3,833,000 | ) | | 28,589,000 |
| | 74,170,000 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 95,678,000 |
| | 113,226,000 |
| | 271,307,000 |
| | 75,714,000 |
| | 1,510,000 |
| 111,412,000 |
| | 95,678,000 |
| | 113,226,000 |
| | 271,307,000 |
| | 75,714,000 |
|
| Interest expense | 68,230,000 |
| | 60,489,000 |
| | 43,697,000 |
| | 5,619,000 |
| | 258,000 |
| 83,094,000 |
| | 68,230,000 |
| | 60,489,000 |
| | 43,697,000 |
| | 5,619,000 |
|
| Gain on dispositions of real estate investments | — |
| | (3,370,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | (3,370,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Impairment of real estate investments | 2,542,000 |
| | 14,070,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 2,542,000 |
| | 14,070,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Loss from unconsolidated entities | 3,877,000 |
| | 5,048,000 |
| | 18,377,000 |
| | 590,000 |
| | — |
| 2,097,000 |
| | 3,877,000 |
| | 5,048,000 |
| | 18,377,000 |
| | 590,000 |
|
| Foreign currency loss (gain) | 2,690,000 |
| | (4,045,000 | ) | | 8,755,000 |
| | 3,199,000 |
| | — |
| |
| Foreign currency (gain) loss | | (1,730,000 | ) | | 2,690,000 |
| | (4,045,000 | ) | | 8,755,000 |
| | 3,199,000 |
|
| Other income | (1,248,000 | ) | | (1,517,000 | ) | | (1,085,000 | ) | | (839,000 | ) | | (25,000 | ) | (3,736,000 | ) | | (1,248,000 | ) | | (1,517,000 | ) | | (1,085,000 | ) | | (839,000 | ) |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (797,000 | ) | | (3,227,000 | ) | | 343,000 |
| | 190,000 |
| | — |
| |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 1,524,000 |
| | (797,000 | ) | | (3,227,000 | ) | | 343,000 |
| | 190,000 |
|
| Net operating income | $ | 211,366,000 |
| | $ | 214,778,000 |
| | $ | 195,038,000 |
| | $ | 60,146,000 |
| | $ | 2,582,000 |
| $ | 221,397,000 |
| | $ | 211,366,000 |
| | $ | 214,778,000 |
| | $ | 195,038,000 |
| | $ | 60,146,000 |
|
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, except where the context otherwise requires.noted.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such consolidated financial statements and information have been prepared to reflect our financial position as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, together with our results of operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 20182019, 20172018 and 2016.2017.
Forward-Looking Statements
Historical results and trends should not be taken as indicative of future operations. Our statements contained in this report that are not historical factual statements are “forward-looking statements.” Actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “expect,” “project,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential,” “seek” and any other comparable and derivative terms or the negatives thereof. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate market specifically; legislative and regulatory changes, including changes to laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts, or REITs; the availability of capital; changes in interest and foreign currency exchange rates; competition in the real estate industry; the supply and demand for operating properties in our proposed market areas; changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, policies or guidelines applicable to REITs; the success of our investment strategy; the availability of financing; and our ongoing relationship with American Healthcare Investors, LLC, or American Healthcare Investors, and Griffin Capital Company, LLC, or Griffin Capital, or collectively, our co-sponsors, and their affiliates. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning us and our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.
Overview and Background
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was incorporated on January 11, 2013, and therefore, we consider that our date of inception. We were initially capitalized on January 15, 2013. We invest in a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. We also operate healthcare-related facilities utilizing the structure permitted by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007, which is commonly referred to as a “RIDEA” structure (the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, authorizing the RIDEA structure were enacted as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008). We also originate and acquire secured loans and may also originate and acquire other real estate-related investments on an infrequent and opportunistic basis. We generally seek investments that produce current income. We qualified to be taxed as a REIT under the Code for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014, and we intend to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.
On February 26, 2014, we commenced a best efforts initial public offering, or our initial offering, in which we offered to the public up to $1,900,000,000 in shares of our common stock. As of April 22, 2015, the deregistration date of our initial offering, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our initial offering for 184,930,598 shares of our common stock, or $1,842,618,000, excluding shares of our common stock issued pursuant to our initial distribution reinvestment plan, or the Initial DRIP. As of April 22, 2015, a total of $18,511,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 1,948,563 shares of our common stock being issued pursuant to the Initial DRIP.
On March 25, 2015, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, to register a maximum of $250,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the Initial DRIP, or the 2015 DRIP Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering following the deregistration of our initial offering on April 22, 2015.offering. Effective October 5, 2016, we amended and restated the Initial DRIP, or the Amended and Restated DRIP, to amend the price at which shares of our common stock are issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering. We intend to continuecontinued to offer shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering until the termination and deregistration of such offering.offering on March 29, 2019. As of March 29, 2019, a total of $245,396,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 26,386,545 shares of our common stock being issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering.
On January 30, 2019, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to register a maximum of $200,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the Amended and Restated DRIP, or the 2019 DRIP Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering on April 1, 2019, following the deregistration of the 2015 DRIP Offering. As of December 31, 2019, a total of $41,244,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 4,398,586 shares of common stock being issued pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering. We collectively refer to the Initial DRIP portion of our initial offering, the 2015 DRIP Offering and the 2019 DRIP Offering as our DRIP Offerings. See Note 13, Equity — Distribution Reinvestment Plan, and Note 23, Subsequent Events — 2019 DRIP Offering, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a discussion of the 2019 DRIP Offering, which will commence immediately following the termination of the 2015 DRIP Offering. As of December 31, 2018, a total of $231,200,000 in distributions were reinvested and 24,871,447 shares of our common stock were issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering.
further discussion.
On October 3, 2018,2019, our board of directors, or our board, at the recommendation of the audit committee of our board, comprised solely of independent directors, unanimously approved and established the most recentan updated estimated per share net asset value, or NAV, of our common stock of $9.37.$9.40. We provide an updated estimated per share NAV on at least an annual basis to assist broker-dealers in connection with their obligations under National Association of Securities Dealers Conduct Rule 2340, as required by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, Rule 2231 with respect to customer account statements. The most recentupdated estimated per share NAV is based on the estimated value of our assets less the estimated value of our liabilities, divided by the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis, calculated as of June 30, 2018.2019. The valuation was performed in accordance with the methodology provided in Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs, issued by the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives, or the IPA, in April 2013, in addition to guidance from the SEC. We intend to continue to publish an updated estimated per share NAV on at least an annual basis. See our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 4, 20182019 for more information on the methodologies and assumptions used to determine, and the limitations and risks of, our most recentupdated estimated per share NAV.
We conduct substantially all of our operations through Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, or our operating partnership. We are externally advised by Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Advisor, or our advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement, or the Advisory Agreement, between us and our advisor. The Advisory Agreement was effective as of February 26, 2014 and had a one-year initial term, subject to successive one-year renewals upon the mutual consent of the parties. The Advisory Agreement was last renewed pursuant to the mutual consent of the parties on February 13, 201911, 2020 and expires on February 26, 2020.2021. Our advisor uses its best efforts, subject to the oversight, review and approval of our board, to, among other things, research, identify, review and make investments in and dispositions of properties and securities on our behalf consistent with our investment policies and objectives. Our advisor performs its duties and responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement as our fiduciary. Our advisor is 75.0% owned and managed by wholly owned subsidiaries of American Healthcare Investors, and 25.0% owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of Griffin Capital. American Healthcare Investors is 47.1% owned by AHI Group Holdings, LLC, or AHI Group Holdings, 45.1% indirectly owned by Colony Capital, Inc. (NYSE: CLNY), or Colony Capital, and 7.8% owned by James F. Flaherty III, a former partner of Colony Capital. We are not affiliated with Griffin Capital, Griffin Capital Securities, LLC, the dealer manager for our initial offering, Colony Capital, or Mr. Flaherty; however, we are affiliated with Griffin-American Advisor, American Healthcare Investors and AHI Group Holdings.
We currently operate through six reportable business segments: medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEA and integrated senior health campuses. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we owned and/or operated 9798 properties, comprising 101102 buildings, and 112118 integrated senior health campuses including completed development projects, or approximately 13,251,00013,836,000 square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, for an aggregate contract purchase price of $2,940,990,000.$3,001,462,000. In addition, as of December 31, 2018,2019, we had invested $89,079,000 inalso owned a real estate-related investments, net of principal repayments.investment purchased for $60,429,000.
Critical Accounting Policies
We believe that our critical accounting policies are those that require significant judgments and estimates such as those related to revenue recognition, tenant and resident receivables, allowance for uncollectible accounts, accounting for property acquisitions, depreciation of and capitalization of expenditures on our real estate investments, impairment of long-lived assets, goodwill and intangibles, properties held for sale and qualification as a REIT for income tax purposes. These estimates may require complex judgment in their application and are evaluated on an on-going basis using information that is available as well as various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, if our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, we may have applied a different accounting treatment, resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. A discussion of our critical accounting policies is included within Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies during 20182019 other than those resulting from new accounting standards.
Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of recently issued or adopted accounting pronouncements, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Acquisitions and Dispositions in 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
For a discussion of our acquisitions and dispositions of real estate investments in 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, see Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Factors Which May Influence Results of Operations
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally, that may reasonably be expected to have a material impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income from the acquisition, management and operation of properties other than those listed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Revenues
However, due to the recent outbreak of the coronavirus in the United States and globally, our residents, tenants and operating partners may be impacted. The amountimpact of revenues generated by our properties depends principallythe coronavirus on our abilityfuture results could be significant and will largely depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus, the success of actions taken to maintaincontain or treat the occupancy rates of currently leased spacecoronavirus, and to lease available space at the then existing market rates. Negative trends in one or more of these factors could adversely affect our revenues in future periods.reactions by consumers, companies, governmental entities and capital markets.
Scheduled Lease Expirations
Excluding our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses, as of December 31, 2018,2019, our properties were 92.5%91.9% leased and during 2019, 7.7%2020, 7.9% of the leased GLA is scheduled to expire. Our leasing strategy on such properties focuses on negotiating renewals for leases scheduled to expire during the next twelve months. In the future, if we are unable to negotiate renewals, we will try to identify new tenants or collaborate with existing tenants who are seeking additional space to occupy. As of December 31, 2018,2019, our remaining weighted average lease term was 8.37.5 years, excluding our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and our integrated senior health campuses.
Our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and integrated senior health campuses were 84.9% and 84.8%86.1% leased, respectively, for the 12 monthsyear ended December 31, 2018.2019. Substantially all of our leases with residents at such properties are for a term of one year or less.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
Our primary sources of revenue include rent and resident fees and services from our properties. Our primary expenses include property operating expenses and rental expenses. In general, we expect amounts related to our portfolio of operating properties to increase in the future based on ongoing developmentdevelopments of properties, as well as the result of any additional real estate and real estate-related investments we may acquire.acquire or originate.
We segregate our operations into reporting segments in order to assess the performance of our business in the same way that management reviews our performance and makes operating decisions. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we operated through six reportable business segments: medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEA and integrated senior health campuses.
Except where otherwise noted, the changes in our results of operations for 20182019 as compared to 20172018 and 20162017 are primarily due to the development and expansion of our portfolio of integrated senior health campuses, as well as the growth in our pharmaceutical and rehabilitation businesses within our integrated senior health campuses segment. In addition, the changes in our results of operations were due to transitioning the operations of seven senior housing facilities within North Carolina ALF Portfolio to a RIDEA structure on December 1, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we owned and/or operated the following types of properties:
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Number of Buildings/ Campuses | | Aggregate Contract Purchase Price | | Leased % | | Number of Buildings/ Campuses | | Aggregate Contract Purchase Price | | Leased % | | Number of Buildings | | Aggregate Contract Purchase Price | | Leased % | Number of Buildings/ Campuses | | Aggregate Contract Purchase Price | | Leased % | | Number of Buildings/ Campuses | | Aggregate Contract Purchase Price | | Leased % | | Number of Buildings/ Campuses | | Aggregate Contract Purchase Price | | Leased % |
| Integrated senior health campuses | 112 |
| | $ | 1,500,649,000 |
| | (1 | ) | | 107 |
| | $ | 1,441,058,000 |
| | (1) |
| | 104 |
| | $ | 1,367,430,000 |
| | (1) |
| 118 |
| | $ | 1,546,121,000 |
| | (1 | ) | | 112 |
| | $ | 1,500,649,000 |
| | (1) |
| | 107 |
| | $ | 1,441,058,000 |
| | (1) |
|
| Medical office buildings | 64 |
| | 664,135,000 |
| | 89.3 | % | | 64 |
| | 663,835,000 |
| | 92.0 | % | | 62 |
| | 654,245,000 |
| | 92.1 | % | 64 |
| | 664,135,000 |
| | 89.1 | % | | 64 |
| | 664,135,000 |
| | 89.3 | % | | 64 |
| | 663,835,000 |
| | 92.0 | % |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | | 20 |
| | 433,891,000 |
| | (2 | ) | | 13 |
| | 320,035,000 |
| | (2) |
| | 13 |
| | 320,035,000 |
| | (2) |
|
| Senior housing | 15 |
| | 188,391,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 14 |
| | 173,391,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 13 |
| | 158,391,000 |
| | 100 | % | 9 |
| | 89,535,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 15 |
| | 188,391,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 14 |
| | 173,391,000 |
| | 100 | % |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | 13 |
| | 320,035,000 |
| | (2 | ) | | 13 |
| | 320,035,000 |
| | (2) |
| | 13 |
| | 320,035,000 |
| | (2) |
| |
| Skilled nursing facilities | 7 |
| | 128,000,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 7 |
| | 128,000,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 7 |
| | 128,000,000 |
| | 100 | % | 7 |
| | 128,000,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 7 |
| | 128,000,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 7 |
| | 128,000,000 |
| | 100 | % |
| Hospitals | 2 |
| | 139,780,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 2 |
| | 139,780,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 2 |
| | 139,780,000 |
| | 100 | % | 2 |
| | 139,780,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 2 |
| | 139,780,000 |
| | 100 | % | | 2 |
| | 139,780,000 |
| | 100 | % |
| Total/weighted average(3) | 213 |
| | $ | 2,940,990,000 |
| | 92.5 | % | | 207 |
| | $ | 2,866,099,000 |
| | 94.3 | % | | 201 |
| | $ | 2,767,881,000 |
| | 94.4 | % | 220 |
| | $ | 3,001,462,000 |
| | 91.9 | % | | 213 |
| | $ | 2,940,990,000 |
| | 92.5 | % | | 207 |
| | $ | 2,866,099,000 |
| | 94.3 | % |
___________
| |
| (1) | The leased percentage for the resident units of our integrated senior health campuses was 84.8%86.1%, 85.3%84.8% and 87.3%85.3% for the 12 monthsyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, respectively. |
| |
| (2) | The leased percentage for the resident units of our senior housing — RIDEA facilities was 84.9%, 85.0%84.9% and 86.1%85.0% for the 12 monthsyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, respectively. |
| |
| (3) | Leased percentage excludes our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and integrated senior health campuses. |
Revenues
Revenues by reportable segment consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Resident Fees and Services | | | | | |
| Integrated senior health campuses | $ | 1,030,934,000 |
| | $ | 940,616,000 |
| | $ | 863,029,000 |
|
| Senior housing — RIDEA | 68,144,000 |
| | 65,075,000 |
| | 64,192,000 |
|
| Total resident fees and services | 1,099,078,000 |
| | 1,005,691,000 |
| | 927,221,000 |
|
| Real Estate Revenue | | | | | |
| Medical office buildings | 80,805,000 |
| | 80,078,000 |
| | 78,584,000 |
|
| Senior housing | 18,407,000 |
| | 21,913,000 |
| | 20,898,000 |
|
| Skilled nursing facilities | 13,345,000 |
| | 14,887,000 |
| | 14,884,000 |
|
| Hospitals | 11,481,000 |
| | 12,691,000 |
| | 12,705,000 |
|
| Total real estate revenue | 124,038,000 |
| | 129,569,000 |
| | 127,071,000 |
|
| Total revenues | $ | 1,223,116,000 |
| | $ | 1,135,260,000 |
| | $ | 1,054,292,000 |
|
The amount of revenues generated by our properties depends principally on our ability to maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space and to lease available space at the then existing rental rates. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, resident fees and services primarily consisted of rental fees related to resident leases, extended health care fees and other ancillary services. Upon our adoption of Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASC Topic 606, on January 1, 2018, revenues from resident fees and services for 2018 were reduced by $7,227,000, which substantially all of such amount was previously recorded to bad debt expense within general and administrative.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, real estate revenue primarily consisted of base rent and expense recoveries.
Revenues by reportable The decrease in real estate revenue for our senior housing segment consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Resident Fees and Services | | | | | |
| Integrated senior health campuses | $ | 940,616,000 |
| | $ | 863,029,000 |
| | $ | 810,034,000 |
|
| Senior housing — RIDEA | 65,075,000 |
| | 64,192,000 |
| | 62,371,000 |
|
| Total resident fees and services | 1,005,691,000 |
| | 927,221,000 |
| | 872,405,000 |
|
| Real Estate Revenue | | | | | |
| Medical office buildings | 80,078,000 |
| | 78,584,000 |
| | 73,252,000 |
|
| Senior housing | 21,913,000 |
| | 20,898,000 |
| | 18,517,000 |
|
| Skilled nursing facilities | 14,887,000 |
| | 14,884,000 |
| | 8,686,000 |
|
| Hospitals | 12,691,000 |
| | 12,705,000 |
| | 16,711,000 |
|
| Total real estate revenue | 129,569,000 |
| | 127,071,000 |
| | 117,166,000 |
|
| Total revenues | $ | 1,135,260,000 |
| | $ | 1,054,292,000 |
| | $ | 989,571,000 |
|
December 31, 2019, compared to 2018 and 2017, is primarily due to the write-off of $2,345,000 in deferred rent receivables in connection with the termination of a management services agreement with an operator during the year December 31, 2019. The decrease in real estate revenue for our skilled nursing facilities segment for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to 2018 and 2017, is primarily due to the $1,334,000 write-off of receivables that we estimated to be uncollectible during the year December 31, 2019. The decrease in real estate revenue for our hospitals segment for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to 2018 and 2017, is primarily due to the exclusion of $1,065,000 and $1,080,000, respectively, of property tax recoveries that resulted upon our adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 842, Leases on January 1, 2019. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Leases, to our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Property Operating Expenses and Rental Expenses
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, property operating expenses primarily consisted of administration and benefits expense of $847,602,000, $775,804,000 $705,072,000 and $661,736,000,$705,072,000, respectively. Property operating expenses and property operating expenses as a percentage of resident fees and services, as well as rental expenses and rental expenses as a percentage of real estate revenue, by reportable segment consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Property Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Integrated senior health campuses | $ | 844,279,000 |
| | 89.8 | % | | $ | 763,306,000 |
| | 88.4 | % | | $ | 722,793,000 |
| | 89.2 | % | $ | 919,793,000 |
| | 89.2 | % | | $ | 844,279,000 |
| | 89.8 | % | | $ | 763,306,000 |
| | 88.4 | % |
| Senior housing — RIDEA | 44,792,000 |
| | 68.8 | % | | 43,133,000 |
| | 67.2 | % | | 42,346,000 |
| | 67.9 | % | 48,067,000 |
| | 70.5 | % | | 44,792,000 |
| | 68.8 | % | | 43,133,000 |
| | 67.2 | % |
| Total property operating expenses | $ | 889,071,000 |
| | 88.4 | % | | $ | 806,439,000 |
| | 87.0 | % | | $ | 765,139,000 |
| | 87.7 | % | $ | 967,860,000 |
| | 88.1 | % | | $ | 889,071,000 |
| | 88.4 | % | | $ | 806,439,000 |
| | 87.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Rental Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Medical office buildings | $ | 30,514,000 |
| | 38.1 | % | | $ | 29,344,000 |
| | 37.3 | % | | $ | 26,863,000 |
| | 36.7 | % | $ | 30,870,000 |
| | 38.2 | % | | $ | 30,514,000 |
| | 38.1 | % | | $ | 29,344,000 |
| | 37.3 | % |
| Skilled nursing facilities | 1,816,000 |
| | 12.2 | % | | 1,608,000 |
| | 10.8 | % | | 758,000 |
| | 8.7 | % | 1,456,000 |
| | 10.9 | % | | 1,816,000 |
| | 12.2 | % | | 1,608,000 |
| | 10.8 | % |
| Senior housing | | 1,001,000 |
| | 5.4 | % | | 837,000 |
| | 3.8 | % | | 670,000 |
| | 3.2 | % |
| Hospitals | 1,656,000 |
| | 13.0 | % | | 1,453,000 |
| | 11.4 | % | | 1,235,000 |
| | 7.4 | % | 532,000 |
| | 4.6 | % | | 1,656,000 |
| | 13.0 | % | | 1,453,000 |
| | 11.4 | % |
| Senior housing | 837,000 |
| | 3.8 | % | | 670,000 |
| | 3.2 | % | | 538,000 |
| | 2.9 | % | |
| Total rental expenses | $ | 34,823,000 |
| | 26.9 | % | | $ | 33,075,000 |
| | 26.0 | % | | $ | 29,394,000 |
| | 25.1 | % | $ | 33,859,000 |
| | 27.3 | % | | $ | 34,823,000 |
| | 26.9 | % | | $ | 33,075,000 |
| | 26.0 | % |
Integrated senior health campuses and senior housing — RIDEA facilities typically have a higher percentage of operating expenses to revenue than multi-tenant medical office buildings, hospitals, senior housing facilities and skilled nursing facilities.facilities due to the nature of RIDEA facilities where we conduct day-to-day operations. We anticipate that the percentage of operating expenses to revenue may fluctuate based on the types of property we own and/or operate in the future.
General and Administrative
General and administrative consisted of the following for the periods then ended:
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Asset management fees — affiliates | $ | 19,373,000 |
| | $ | 18,793,000 |
| | $ | 16,949,000 |
| $ | 20,073,000 |
| | $ | 19,373,000 |
| | $ | 18,793,000 |
|
| Professional and legal fees | | 2,965,000 |
| | 2,578,000 |
| | 2,559,000 |
|
| Stock compensation expense | 3,026,000 |
| | 986,000 |
| | 1,620,000 |
| 2,744,000 |
| | 3,026,000 |
| | 986,000 |
|
| Professional and legal fees | 2,578,000 |
| | 2,559,000 |
| | 3,019,000 |
| |
| Transfer agent services | 1,239,000 |
| | 1,310,000 |
| | 1,579,000 |
| 1,340,000 |
| | 1,239,000 |
| | 1,310,000 |
|
| Bad debt expense | 490,000 |
| | 6,674,000 |
| | 4,105,000 |
| 991,000 |
| | 490,000 |
| | 6,674,000 |
|
| Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance | | 314,000 |
| | 315,000 |
| | 321,000 |
|
| Bank charges | 374,000 |
| | 416,000 |
| | 352,000 |
| 282,000 |
| | 374,000 |
| | 416,000 |
|
| Franchise taxes | 354,000 |
| | 414,000 |
| | 270,000 |
| |
| Directors’ and officers’ liability insurance | 315,000 |
| | 321,000 |
| | 311,000 |
| |
| Board of directors fees | 262,000 |
| | 247,000 |
| | 234,000 |
| 280,000 |
| | 262,000 |
| | 247,000 |
|
| Restricted stock compensation | 215,000 |
| | 216,000 |
| | 196,000 |
| 215,000 |
| | 215,000 |
| | 216,000 |
|
| Franchise taxes | | 82,000 |
| | 354,000 |
| | 414,000 |
|
| Other | 544,000 |
| | 651,000 |
| | 316,000 |
| 463,000 |
| | 544,000 |
| | 651,000 |
|
| Total | $ | 28,770,000 |
| | $ | 32,587,000 |
| | $ | 28,951,000 |
| $ | 29,749,000 |
| | $ | 28,770,000 |
| | $ | 32,587,000 |
|
The increase in general and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to 2018 was primarily due to the increase in asset management fees as a result of an increase in our average invested assets through capital expenditures and property acquisitions in 2019 as compared to 2018. The decrease in general and administrative in 2018 compared to 2017 and 2016 was primarily due to the adoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASC Topic 606, on January 1, 2018, such that substantially all amounts previously recorded to bad debt expense are now recorded as reductions of resident fees and services revenue. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Revenue Recognition, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our adoption of ASC Topic 606. Such decrease in general and administrative in 2018 as compared to 2017 and 2016 was partially offset by the increase in stock compensation expense due to fair value adjustments to performance-based profit interest units in Trilogy Investors, LLC, or Trilogy. See Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests,interests, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of the profit interest units in Trilogy.
Acquisition Related Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2018, 2019, we recorded negative acquisition related expenses of $(2,913,000), which primarily related to $(2,843,000) of fair value adjustments to contingent consideration obligations. See Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our contingent consideration obligations. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we also completed $65,901,000$34,638,000 in property acquisitions that we accounted for as asset acquisitions; however, the direct acquisition related expenses of $3,044,000$836,000 associated with such property acquisitions were capitalized in our consolidated balance sheets in accordance with Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business,, or ASU 2017-01.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded negative acquisition related expenses of $(3,833,000), which primarily related to $(3,885,000) of fair value adjustments to contingent consideration obligations. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we also completed $113,584,000 in property acquisitions that we accounted for as asset acquisitions; however, the direct acquisition related expenses of $3,050,000 associated with such property acquisitions were capitalized in accordance with ASU 2017-01.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, acquisition related expenses were $28,589,000, which were related primarily to expenses associated with our completion of $498,656,000 in property acquisitions that we accounted for as business combinations during 2016 in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, or ASC Topic 805, including acquisition fees of $9,591,000 incurred to our advisor. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Property Acquisitions, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of ASU 2017-01 and ASC Topic 805.2017-01. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we also recorded negative acquisition related expenses of $(161,000), which are primarily related to $(681,000) in fair value adjustments to a contingent consideration obligation. See Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our contingent consideration obligation.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, we completed $65,901,000 in property acquisitions that we accounted for as asset acquisitions; however, the direct acquisition related expenses of $3,044,000 associated with such property acquisitions were capitalized. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded negative acquisition related expenses of $(2,913,000), which primarily related to $(2,843,000) in fair value adjustments to contingent consideration obligations.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we completed $113,584,000 in property acquisitions that we accounted for as asset acquisitions; however, the direct acquisition related expenses of $3,055,000 associated with such property acquisitions were capitalized. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we also recorded negative acquisition related expenses of $(3,833,000), which primarily related to $(3,885,000) in fair value adjustments to contingent consideration obligations.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, depreciation and amortization was $111,412,000, $95,678,000 $113,226,000 and $271,307,000,$113,226,000, respectively, which primarily consisted of depreciation on our operating properties of $90,914,000, $83,309,000 $81,743,000 and $68,708,000,$81,743,000, respectively, and amortization on our identified intangible assets of $19,366,000, $11,628,000 $31,033,000 and $201,427,000,$31,033,000, respectively.
The increase in depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily due to the write-off of certain assets in connection with the termination of a management services agreement with an operator during the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease in amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the yearyears ended December 31, 2019 and 2017 was primarily the result of amortization expense on our identified intangible assets recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017 of $21,702,000, which related to $33,084,000 of in-place leases of our integrated senior health campuses and senior housing — RIDEA properties that were fully amortized by January 2018. The decrease in amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily the result of amortization expense on our identified intangible assets recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016 of $181,350,000, which related to $211,317,000 of in-place leases of our integrated senior health campuses and senior housing — RIDEA properties that were fully amortized during 2016 and therefore no expense was incurred during 2017.
Interest Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, interestInterest expense, including gain or loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments, consisted of the following for the periods then ended: | | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Interest expense — lines of credit and term loans and derivative financial instruments | | $ | 36,064,000 |
| | $ | 29,508,000 |
| | $ | 24,839,000 |
|
| Interest expense — mortgage loans payable | $ | 29,183,000 |
| | $ | 26,632,000 |
| | $ | 19,638,000 |
| 32,714,000 |
| | 29,183,000 |
| | 26,632,000 |
|
| Interest expense — lines of credit and term loans and derivative financial instruments | 29,508,000 |
| | 24,839,000 |
| | 21,578,000 |
| |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs — lines of credit and term loans | 4,637,000 |
| | 4,331,000 |
| | 3,456,000 |
| 3,664,000 |
| | 4,637,000 |
| | 4,331,000 |
|
| Amortization of deferred financing costs — mortgage loans payable | 1,269,000 |
| | 1,446,000 |
| | 1,065,000 |
| 1,449,000 |
| | 1,269,000 |
| | 1,446,000 |
|
| Amortization of debt discount/premium, net | | 647,000 |
| | 537,000 |
| | 998,000 |
|
| Loss (gain) in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 1,949,000 |
| | (383,000 | ) | | (1,968,000 | ) | 4,541,000 |
| | 1,949,000 |
| | (383,000 | ) |
| Interest expense on other liabilities | 1,147,000 |
| | 1,194,000 |
| | — |
| |
| Amortization of debt discount/premium, net | 537,000 |
| | 998,000 |
| | (72,000 | ) | |
| Loss on extinguishment of mortgage loan payable | — |
| | 1,432,000 |
| | — |
| |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | 2,968,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,432,000 |
|
| Accretion of finance lease liabilities | | 390,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Interest expense on financing obligations and other liabilities | | 657,000 |
| | 1,147,000 |
| | 1,194,000 |
|
| Total | $ | 68,230,000 |
| | $ | 60,489,000 |
| | $ | 43,697,000 |
| $ | 83,094,000 |
| | $ | 68,230,000 |
| | $ | 60,489,000 |
|
The increase in total interest expense in 2019 as compared to 2018 was primarily related to the increase in debt balances as well as the increase in loss on fair value recognized on the derivative financial instruments, which was due to a decrease in LIBOR rates relative to our interest rate swap contracts. The loss on extinguishment of debt in 2019 was due to the early payoff of two mortgage loans payable and the termination of a line of credit, which resulted in the write-off of unamortized debt discounts and unamortized deferred financing fees, as well as the payment of prepayment penalties. See Note 7, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, and Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further discussion of extinguishment of debt. The increase in interest expense in 2018 as compared to 2017 and 2016 was primarily related to the increase in debt balances and higher weighted average interest rates on our lines of credit and term loans. In addition,loans, as well as the increase in loss on fair value of derivative financial instruments isthat was attributable to such instruments approaching maturity on February 3, 2019.maturity.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our sources of funds primarily consist of operating cash flows and borrowings. In the normal course of business, our principal demands for funds are for our payment of operating expenses, capital improvement expenditures, development of real estate investments, interest on our current and future indebtedness, distributions to our stockholders and repurchases of our common stock and development of real estate investments.stock.
Our total capacity to pay operating expenses, capital improvement expenditures, interest, distributions and repurchases, as well as acquire and/or develop real estate investments, is a function of our current cash position, our borrowing capacity on our lines of credit and term loans, as well as any future indebtedness that we may incur. As of December 31, 2018,2019, our cash on hand was $35,132,000$53,149,000 and we had $111,952,000$174,121,000 available on our lines of credit and term loans. On January 25, 2019, we terminated our existing line of credit and term loans that had an aggregate maximum borrowing capacity of $575,000,000 as of December 31, 2018 with Bank of America, N.A., or Bank of America, and KeyBank, National Association, or KeyBank, and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, and entered into a new credit agreement with Bank of America, KeyBank, Citizens Bank, National Association, and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, which increased our aggregate borrowing capacity to $630,000,000. Such line of credit and term loans can be increased up to a total principal amount of $1,000,000,000, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. See Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, and Note 23, Subsequent Events — 2019 Corporate Line of Credit, to our accompanying consolidated financial statements that are part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our lines of credit and term loans. We believe that these resources will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from other sources within the next 12 months.
We estimate that we will require approximately $44,496,000$63,784,000 to pay interest on our outstanding indebtedness in 2019,2020, based on interest rates in effect and borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2018.2019. In addition, we estimate that we will require $736,420,000$71,838,000 to pay down principal on our outstanding indebtedness in 2019.2020. We also require resources to make certain payments to our advisor and its affiliates. See Note 14, Related Party Transactions, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion of our payments to our advisor and its affiliates. Generally, cash needs for such items will be met from operations and borrowings.
Our advisor evaluates potential investments and engages in negotiations with real estate sellers, developers, brokers, investment managers, lenders and others on our behalf. When we acquire a property, our advisor prepares a capital plan that contemplates the estimated capital needs of that investment. In addition to operating expenses, capital needs may also include costs of refurbishment, tenant improvements or other major capital expenditures. The capital plan also sets forth the anticipated sources of the necessary capital, which may include a line of credit or other loans established with respect to the investment, operating cash generated by the investment, additional equity investments from us or joint venture partners or, when necessary, capital reserves. Any capital reserve would be established from proceeds from sales of other investments, borrowings, operating cash generated by other investments or other cash on hand. In some cases, a lender may require us to establish capital reserves for a particular investment. The capital plan for each investment will be adjusted through ongoing, regular reviews of our portfolio or as necessary to respond to unanticipated additional capital needs.
Based on the budget for the properties we owned as of December 31, 2018,2019, we estimate that our discretionary capital improvement and tenant improvement expenditures willcould require up to $117,197,000$275,499,000 within the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had $13,499,000$12,736,000 of restricted cash in loan impounds and reserve accounts forto fund a portion of capital expenditures, some of which may be used to fund our estimated expenditures for capital improvements and tenant improvements. We cannot provide assurance, however, that we will not exceed these estimated expenditure and distribution levelsexpenditures or be able to obtain additional sources of financing on commercially favorable terms or at all.
Other Liquidity Needs
In the event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due to various factors, including, without limitation, the timing of distributions and share repurchases or the timing of the collection of receivables, we may seek to obtain capital to pay distributions and share repurchases by means of secured or unsecured debt financing through one or more third parties, or our advisor or its affiliates. We may also pay distributions and share repurchases from cash from capital transactions, including without limitation, the sale of one or more of our properties.
IfIn addition, we experience lower occupancy levels, reduced rental rates, reduced revenuesare continuing to monitor the outbreak of the coronavirus and its impact on residents in our senior housing and skilled nursing facilities, our tenants, operating partners and the healthcare industry as a resultwhole. The magnitude and duration of asset sales,the pandemic and its impact on our operations and liquidity is uncertain as of the filing date of our report as this continues to evolve globally. However, if the outbreak continues on its current trajectory, such impacts could grow and become material. To the extent that our residents, tenants and operating partners continue to be impacted by the coronavirus outbreak, or increased capital expenditures and leasing costs compared to historical levels due to competitive market conditions for new and renewed leases,by the effect would be a reduction of net cash provided by operating activities. If such a reduction of net cash provided by operating activities is realized, we may have a cash flow deficitother risks disclosed in subsequent periods. Our estimate of net cash available is based on various assumptions which are difficult to predict, including the levels of leasing activity and related leasing costs.
Any changes in these assumptionsour report, this could impactmaterially disrupt our financial results and our ability to fund working capital and unanticipated cash needs.business operations.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth changes in cash flows: | | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning of period | $ | 64,143,000 |
| | $ | 55,677,000 |
| | $ | 67,491,000 |
| $ | 72,705,000 |
| | $ | 64,143,000 |
| | $ | 55,677,000 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 106,814,000 |
| | 128,103,000 |
| | 114,357,000 |
| 117,454,000 |
| | 106,814,000 |
| | 128,103,000 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (135,772,000 | ) | | (124,551,000 | ) | | (352,687,000 | ) | (103,112,000 | ) | | (135,772,000 | ) | | (124,551,000 | ) |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 37,597,000 |
| | 4,765,000 |
| | 226,656,000 |
| 2,688,000 |
| | 37,597,000 |
| | 4,765,000 |
|
| Effect of foreign currency translation on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | (77,000 | ) | | 149,000 |
| | (140,000 | ) | 145,000 |
| | (77,000 | ) | | 149,000 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — end of period | $ | 72,705,000 |
| | $ | 64,143,000 |
| | $ | 55,677,000 |
| $ | 89,880,000 |
| | $ | 72,705,000 |
| | $ | 64,143,000 |
|
The following summary discussion of our changes in our cash flows is based on our accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows and is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the changes in our cash flows for the periods presented below.
Operating Activities
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, cash flows provided by operating activities primarily related to the cash flows provided by our property operations, offset by the payment of general and administrative expenses. See the “Results of Operations” section above for a further discussion. In general, cash flows provided by operating activities will be affected by the timing of cash receipts and payments.
Investing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash flows used in investing activities primarily related to capital expenditures of $92,836,000 and our 2019 property acquisitions, including our acquisitions of previously leased real estate investments, in the amount of $37,863,000, partially offset by principal repayments on real estate notes receivable of $28,650,000. For the year ended December 31, 2018, cash flows used in investing activities primarily related to our 2018 property acquisitions, including our acquisitions of previously leased real estate investments, in the amount of $67,285,000 and capital expenditures of $66,907,000. For the year ended December 31, 2017, cash flows used in investing activities primarily related to our 2017 property acquisitions, including our acquisitions of previously leased real estate investments, in the amount of $123,088,000 and capital expenditures of $43,553,000, partially offset by principal repayments on real estate notes receivable of $29,478,000 and proceeds from our 2017 real estate dispositions of $15,993,000. For the year ended December 31, 2016, cash flows used in investing activities primarily related to our 2016 property acquisitions in the amount of $299,448,000 and capital expenditures of $45,985,000. In general, cash flows used in investing activities will be affected by a decrease in the number of acquisitions we makecomplete in future years as compared to prior years and the timing of capital expenditures.expenditures and development projects.
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash flows provided by financing activities primarily related to borrowings under mortgage loans payable in the amount of $191,246,000 and net borrowings under our lines of credit and term loans in the amount of $77,831,000, partially offset by share repurchases of $89,888,000, payments on mortgage loans of $74,037,000, distributions to our common stockholders of $62,612,000 and the payoff of mortgage loans payable in the amount of $14,022,000. For the year ended December 31, 2018, cash flows provided by financing activities primarily related to borrowings under mortgage loans payable in the amount of $181,594,000 and net borrowings under our lines of credit and term loans in the amount of $113,923,000, partially offset by the pay-offpayoff of mortgage loans payable in the amount of $94,449,000, share repurchases of $76,577,000 and distributions to our common stockholders of $59,974,000. For the year ended December 31, 2017, cash flows provided by financing activities primarily related to net borrowings under mortgage loans payable in the amount of $230,611,000, partially offset by the pay-offpayoff of mortgage loans payable in the amount of $100,775,000, net payments on our lines of credit and term loans in the amount of $25,192,000, distributions to our common stockholders of $55,777,000 and share repurchases of $30,656,000. For the year ended December 31, 2016, cash flows provided by financing activities primarily related to net borrowings under our lines of credit and term loans in the amount of $299,317,000, partially offset by distributions to our common stockholders of $51,681,000 and share repurchases of $20,941,000. Overall, we anticipate cash flows from financing activities to decrease in the future. However, we anticipate borrowings under our lines of credit and term loans and other indebtedness to increase if we acquire additional real estate and real estate-related investments.
Distributions
The income tax treatment for distributions reportable for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017 was as follows:
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Ordinary income | $ | 33,141,000 |
| | 27.6 | % | | $ | 40,475,000 |
| | 34.1 | % | | $ | 28,135,000 |
| | 24.2 | % | $ | 35,294,000 |
| | 29.9 | % | | $ | 33,141,000 |
| | 27.6 | % | | $ | 40,475,000 |
| | 34.1 | % |
| Capital gain | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Return of capital | 86,833,000 |
| | 72.4 |
| | 78,285,000 |
| | 65.9 |
| | 88,140,000 |
| | 75.8 |
| 82,731,000 |
| | 70.1 |
| | 86,833,000 |
| | 72.4 |
| | 78,285,000 |
| | 65.9 |
|
| | $ | 119,974,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 118,760,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 116,275,000 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 118,025,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 119,974,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 118,760,000 |
| | 100 | % |
Amounts listed above do not include distributions paid on nonvested shares of our restricted common stock which have been separately reported.
See Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Distributions, for a further discussion of our distributions.
Financing
We intend to continue to finance all or a portion of the purchase price of our investments in real estate and real estate-related investments by borrowing funds. We anticipate that our overall leverage will not exceed 45.0% of the combined fair market value of all of our properties and other real estate-related investments, as determined at the end of each calendar year. For these purposes, the market value of each asset will be equal to the contract purchase price paid for the asset or, if the asset was appraised subsequent to the date of purchase, then the market value will be equal to the value reported in the most recent independent appraisal of the asset. Our policies do not limit the amount we may borrow with respect to any individual investment. As of December 31, 2018,2019, our aggregate borrowings were 42.1%44.5% of the combined market value of all of our real estate and real estate-related investments.
Under our charter, we have a limitation on borrowing that precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of our net assets without the approval of a majority of our independent directors. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate-related investments before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves. In addition, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our real properties as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional real estate or for working capital. We may also borrow funds to satisfy the REIT tax qualification requirement that we distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders. Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As of March 21, 201926, 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, our leverage did not exceed 300% of the value of our net assets.
Mortgage Loans Payable, Net
For a discussion of our mortgage loans payable, net, see Note 7, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Lines of Credit and Term Loans
For a discussion of our lines of credit and term loans, see Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
REIT Requirements
In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are required to make distributions to our stockholders of at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains. In the event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due to factors including, without limitation, the timing of such distributions or the timing of the collection of receivables, we may seek to obtain capital to pay distributions by means of secured and unsecured debt financing through one or more unaffiliated third parties. We may also pay distributions from cash from capital transactions including, without limitation, the sale of one or more of our properties or from the proceeds of our initial offering.
Commitments and Contingencies
For a discussion of our commitments and contingencies, see Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Debt Service Requirements
A significant liquidity need is the payment of principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had $713,030,000$816,217,000 ($688,262,000, including792,870,000, net of discount/premium and deferred financing costs, net)costs) of fixed-rate and variable-rate mortgage loans payable outstanding secured by our properties. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had $738,048,000$815,879,000 outstanding and $111,952,000$174,121,000 remained available under our lines of credit and term loans. See Note 7, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net and Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.
We are required by the terms of certain loan documents to meet certain covenants, such as leverage ratios, net worth ratios, debt service coverage ratios, fixed charge coverage ratios and reporting requirements. As of March 21,December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements on our mortgage loans payable and our lines of credit and term loans. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding debt, factoring in our fixed-rate interest rate swaps and interest rate cap, was 4.27%4.03% per annum.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information with respect to: (i) the maturity and scheduled principal repayment of our secured mortgage loans payable and our lines of credit and term loans; (ii) interest payments on our mortgage loans payable, lines of credit and term loans and fixed interest rate swaps and interest rate cap;loans; (iii) ground and other lease obligations; and (iv) financing capital leaseobligations; and other obligations(v) finance leases as of December 31, 20182019: | | | | Payments Due by Period | Payments Due by Period |
| | 2019 | | 2020-2021 | | 2022-2023 | | Thereafter | | Total | 2020 | | 2021-2022 | | 2023-2024 | | Thereafter | | Total |
| Principal payments — fixed-rate debt | $ | 11,482,000 |
| | $ | 34,962,000 |
| | $ | 89,184,000 |
| | $ | 488,988,000 |
| | $ | 624,616,000 |
| $ | 24,223,000 |
| | $ | 75,177,000 |
| | $ | 95,114,000 |
| | $ | 520,272,000 |
| | $ | 714,786,000 |
|
| Interest payments — fixed-rate debt | 23,176,000 |
| | 43,754,000 |
| | 38,701,000 |
| | 280,432,000 |
| | 386,063,000 |
| 26,293,000 |
| | 49,642,000 |
| | 42,174,000 |
| | 259,940,000 |
| | 378,049,000 |
|
| Principal payments — variable-rate debt | 724,938,000 |
| | 101,524,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 826,462,000 |
| 47,615,000 |
| | 599,312,000 |
| | 270,383,000 |
| | — |
| | 917,310,000 |
|
| Interest payments — variable-rate debt (based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2018) | 21,320,000 |
| | 5,435,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 26,755,000 |
| |
| Interest payments — variable-rate debt (based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2019) | | 37,491,000 |
| | 49,050,000 |
| | 8,453,000 |
| | — |
| | 94,994,000 |
|
| Ground and other lease obligations | 22,194,000 |
| | 45,730,000 |
| | 46,856,000 |
| | 177,927,000 |
| | 292,707,000 |
| 24,571,000 |
| | 50,399,000 |
| | 49,882,000 |
| | 187,534,000 |
| | 312,386,000 |
|
| Financing, capital lease and other obligations | 8,628,000 |
| | 17,888,000 |
| | 2,007,000 |
| | — |
| | 28,523,000 |
| |
| Financing obligations | | 12,692,000 |
| | 17,239,000 |
| | 1,882,000 |
| | — |
| | 31,813,000 |
|
| Finance leases | | 1,217,000 |
| | 129,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,346,000 |
|
| Total | $ | 811,738,000 |
| | $ | 249,293,000 |
| | $ | 176,748,000 |
| | $ | 947,347,000 |
| | $ | 2,185,126,000 |
| $ | 174,102,000 |
| | $ | 840,948,000 |
| | $ | 467,888,000 |
| | $ | 967,746,000 |
| | $ | 2,450,684,000 |
|
The table above does not reflect any payment expected under our contingent consideration obligation in the estimated amount of $681,000, which we expect to pay in 2019. For a further discussion of our contingent consideration obligations, see Note 15, Fair Value Measurements — Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value — Contingent Consideration Liabilities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had no off-balance sheet transactions, nor do we currently have any such arrangements or obligations.
Inflation
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016,2017, inflation has not significantly affected our operations because of the moderate inflation rate; however, we expect to be exposed to inflation risk as income from future long-term leases will be the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that will protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions include negotiated rental increases, reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, and real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a per square foot allowance.reimbursements. However, due to the long-term nature of the anticipated leases, among other factors, the leases may not re-set frequently enough to cover inflation.
Related Party Transactions
For a discussion of related party transactions, see Note 14, Related Party Transactions, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. There were no material changes in our market risk exposures, or in the methods we use to manage market risk, between the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018. In pursuing our business plan, we expect that the primary market risk to which we will be exposed is interest rate risk.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to acquire properties and make loans and other permitted investments. We may also be exposed to the effects of changes in interest rates as a result of our investments in real estate notes receivable. Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs while taking into account variable interest rate risk. To achieve our objectives, we may borrow or lend at fixed or variable rates.
We have entered into, and in the future may continue to enter into, derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and interest rate caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument, and for which we have not and may not elect hedge accounting treatment. Because weWe have not elected to apply hedge accounting treatment to these derivatives, therefore changes in the fair value of interest rate derivative financial instruments are recorded as a component of interest expense in gain or loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). As of December 31, 2018,2019, our interest rate cap and interest rate swaps are recorded in other assets, net and security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities, in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets at their aggregate fair value of $48,000$0 and $369,000,$(3,971,000), respectively. We do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes.
TheAs of December 31, 2019, the table below presents as of December 31, 2018, the principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year of expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes. | | | | Expected Maturity Date | Expected Maturity Date |
| | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | Thereafter | | Total | | Fair Value | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | Thereafter | | Total | | Fair Value |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed-rate notes receivable — principal payments | $ | 28,650,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 28,650,000 |
| | $ | 28,782,000 |
| |
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing fixed-rate notes receivable | 6.75 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 6.75 | % | | — |
| |
| Debt security held-to-maturity | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 93,433,000 |
| | $ | 93,433,000 |
| | $ | 94,116,000 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 93,433,000 |
| | $ | 93,433,000 |
| | $ | 94,026,000 |
|
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing fixed-rate debt security | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 4.24 | % | | 4.24 | % | | — |
| — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 4.24 | % | | 4.24 | % | | — |
|
| Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed-rate debt — principal payments | $ | 11,482,000 |
| | $ | 22,803,000 |
| | $ | 12,159,000 |
| | $ | 61,083,000 |
| | $ | 28,101,000 |
| | $ | 488,988,000 |
| | $ | 624,616,000 |
| | $ | 529,417,000 |
| $ | 24,223,000 |
| | $ | 13,107,000 |
| | $ | 62,070,000 |
| | $ | 29,127,000 |
| | $ | 65,987,000 |
| | $ | 520,272,000 |
| | $ | 714,786,000 |
| | $ | 631,315,000 |
|
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing fixed-rate debt | 3.72 | % | | 4.84 | % | | 3.67 | % | | 4.15 | % | | 4.15 | % | | 3.61 | % | | 3.74 | % | | — |
| 4.68 | % | | 3.69 | % | | 4.15 | % | | 4.14 | % | | 3.67 | % | | 4.07 | % | | 3.72 | % | | — |
|
| Variable-rate debt — principal payments | $ | 724,938,000 |
| | $ | 60,008,000 |
| | $ | 41,516,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 826,462,000 |
| | $ | 827,451,000 |
| $ | 47,615,000 |
| | $ | 42,312,000 |
| | $ | 557,000,000 |
| | $ | 265,574,000 |
| | $ | 4,809,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 917,310,000 |
| | $ | 917,886,000 |
|
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing variable-rate debt (based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2018) | 5.05 | % | | 5.95 | % | | 4.93 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | 5.16 | % | | — |
| |
| Weighted average interest rate on maturing variable-rate debt (based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2019) | | 4.66 | % | | 3.87 | % | | 3.83 | % | | 4.53 | % | | 5.38 | % | | — | % | | 4.14 | % | | — |
|
Real Estate Notes Receivable and Debt Security Investment, Net
As of December 31, 2018,2019, the carrying value of our real estate notes receivable and debt security investment, net was $98,655,000.$72,717,000. As we expect to hold our fixed-rate notes receivable and debt security investment to maturity and the amounts due under such notes receivable and debt security investment would be limited to the outstanding principal balance and any accrued and unpaid interest, we do not expect that fluctuations in interest rates, and the resulting change in fair value of our fixed-rate notes receivable and debt security investment, would have a significant impact on our operations. See Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a discussion of the fair value of our real estate notes receivable and our investment in a held-to-maturity debt security. The weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding real estate notes receivable and debt security investment, net was 4.83%4.24% per annum based on rates in effect as of December 31, 2018.2019.
Mortgage Loans Payable, Net and Lines of Credit and Term LoansLoans
Mortgage loans payable were $713,030,000$816,217,000 ($688,262,000, including792,870,000, net of discount/premium and deferred financing costs, net)costs) as of December 31, 2018.2019. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had 5758 fixed-rate mortgage loans payable and sixseven variable-rate mortgage loans payable with effective interest rates ranging from 2.45% to 8.46%6.21% per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of 3.98%3.85%. In addition, as of December 31, 2018,2019, we had $738,048,000$815,879,000 outstanding under our lines of credit and term loans, at a weighted-average interest rate of 5.05%4.05% per annum.
As of December 31, 2018,2019, the weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding debt, factoring in our fixed-rate interest rate swaps and interest rate cap, was 4.27%4.03% per annum. An increase in the variable interest rate on our variable-rate mortgage loans payable and lines of credit and term loans constitutes a market risk. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we have a fixed-rate interest rate cap on one of our variable-rate mortgage loans payable and threetwo fixed-rate interest rate swaps on one of our lines of credit and term loans for an aggregate notional amount of $270,000,000, andloans; an increase in the variable interest rate thereon would have no effect on our overall annual interest expense. As of December 31, 2018,2019, a 0.50% increase in the market rates of interest would have increased our overall annualized interest expense on all of our other variable-rate mortgage loans payable and lines of credit and term loans by $2,893,000,$2,724,000, or 4.93%3.96% of total annualized interest expense on our mortgage loans payable and lines of credit and term loans. See Note 7, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, and Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for a further discussion.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Foreign currency exchange rate risk is the possibility that our financial results could be better or worse than planned because of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Based solely on our results for the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, if foreign currency exchange rates were to increase or decrease by 1.00%, our net income from these investments would decrease or increase, as applicable, by approximately $19,000$21,000 for the same period.
Other Market Risk
In addition to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, the value of our future investments is subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of tenants, which may affect our ability to refinance our debt if necessary.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
See Part IV, Item 15, Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to us, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and we necessarily are required to apply our judgment in evaluating whether the benefits of the controls and procedures that we adopt outweigh their costs.
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, an evaluation as of December 31, 20182019 was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2018,2019, were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision, and with the participation, of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on our evaluation under the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued in 2013, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.2019.
(c) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20182019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
On March 19, 2019, we adopted Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Plan, or the Amendment. The Amendment, which will take effect with respect to share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter 2019, limits the number of shares that we will repurchase during any fiscal quarter to an amount equal to the net proceeds that we received from the sale of shares issued pursuant to the DRIP Offerings during the immediately preceding completed fiscal quarter; provided however, that shares subject to a repurchase requested upon the death or qualifying disability of a stockholder will not be subject to this quarterly cap or to our existing cap on repurchases to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the calendar year prior to the repurchase date. The Amendment also provides that in cases where we cannot purchase all shares presented for repurchase in any calendar quarter, based upon insufficient cash available and/or the limit on the number of shares we may repurchase during any calendar year or fiscal quarter, we may give priority to requests for repurchases where pro rata repurchases would result in a stockholder owning less than $2,500 of shares, which requests may be redeemed in full, rather than on a pro rata basis.
In all other material respects, the terms of our share repurchase plan remain unchanged by the Amendment.
The foregoing description of the amendments to our share repurchase plan reflected in the Amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Plan attached as Exhibit 10.13 to this report and incorporated herein by reference.None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to our 20192020 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to our 20192020 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to our 20192020 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to our 20192020 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to our 20192020 annual meeting of stockholders.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a)(1) Financial Statements:
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedule:
The following financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 20182019 is submitted herewith:
All schedules other than the one listed above have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in our consolidated financial statements or related notes.
(a)(3) Exhibits:
(b) Exhibits:
See Item 15(a)(3) above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedule:
See Item 15(a)(2) above.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Griffin AmericanGriffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2019, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 842, Leases, using the modified retrospective approach.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 21, 201926, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| ASSETS |
| Real estate investments, net | $ | 2,222,681,000 |
| | $ | 2,163,258,000 |
|
| Real estate notes receivable and debt security investment, net | 98,655,000 |
| | 97,988,000 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 35,132,000 |
| | 33,656,000 |
|
| Accounts and other receivables, net | 122,918,000 |
| | 117,188,000 |
|
| Restricted cash | 37,573,000 |
| | 30,487,000 |
|
| Real estate deposits | 3,077,000 |
| | 3,261,000 |
|
| Identified intangible assets, net | 179,521,000 |
| | 180,308,000 |
|
| Goodwill | 75,309,000 |
| | 75,309,000 |
|
| Other assets, net | 114,226,000 |
| | 99,020,000 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 2,889,092,000 |
| | $ | 2,800,475,000 |
|
| | | | |
| LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY |
| Liabilities: | | | |
| Mortgage loans payable, net(1) | $ | 688,262,000 |
| | $ | 613,558,000 |
|
| Lines of credit and term loans(1) | 738,048,000 |
| | 624,125,000 |
|
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(1) | 139,383,000 |
| | 124,503,000 |
|
| Accounts payable due to affiliates(1) | 2,103,000 |
| | 2,057,000 |
|
| Identified intangible liabilities, net | 1,051,000 |
| | 1,568,000 |
|
| Financing and capital lease obligations(1) | 25,947,000 |
| | 16,193,000 |
|
| Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities(1) | 37,418,000 |
| | 39,461,000 |
|
| Total liabilities | 1,632,212,000 |
| | 1,421,465,000 |
|
| | | | |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
| |
|
| | | | |
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests (Note 12) | 38,245,000 |
| | 32,435,000 |
|
| | | | |
| Equity: | | | |
| Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 197,557,377 and 199,343,234 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively | 1,975,000 |
| | 1,993,000 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,765,840,000 |
| | 1,785,872,000 |
|
| Accumulated deficit | (704,748,000 | ) | | (598,044,000 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (2,560,000 | ) | | (1,971,000 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 1,060,507,000 |
| | 1,187,850,000 |
|
| Noncontrolling interests (Note 13) | 158,128,000 |
| | 158,725,000 |
|
| Total equity | 1,218,635,000 |
| | 1,346,575,000 |
|
| Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity | $ | 2,889,092,000 |
| | $ | 2,800,475,000 |
|
___________
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| ASSETS |
| Real estate investments, net | $ | 2,270,421,000 |
| | $ | 2,222,681,000 |
|
| Debt security investment and real estate notes receivable, net | 72,717,000 |
| | 98,655,000 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 53,149,000 |
| | 35,132,000 |
|
| Accounts and other receivables, net | 144,130,000 |
| | 122,918,000 |
|
| Restricted cash | 36,731,000 |
| | 37,573,000 |
|
| Real estate deposits | 223,000 |
| | 3,077,000 |
|
| Identified intangible assets, net | 160,247,000 |
| | 179,521,000 |
|
| Goodwill | 75,309,000 |
| | 75,309,000 |
|
| Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | 219,187,000 |
| | — |
|
| Other assets, net | 140,175,000 |
| | 114,226,000 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 3,172,289,000 |
| | $ | 2,889,092,000 |
|
| | | | |
| LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS AND EQUITY |
| Liabilities: | | | |
| Mortgage loans payable, net(1) | $ | 792,870,000 |
| | $ | 688,262,000 |
|
| Lines of credit and term loans(1) | 815,879,000 |
| | 738,048,000 |
|
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(1) | 171,394,000 |
| | 139,383,000 |
|
| Accounts payable due to affiliates(1) | 2,321,000 |
| | 2,103,000 |
|
| Identified intangible liabilities, net | 663,000 |
| | 1,051,000 |
|
| Financing obligations(1) | 30,918,000 |
| | 25,947,000 |
|
| Operating lease liabilities(1) | 207,371,000 |
| | — |
|
| Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities(1) | 48,105,000 |
| | 37,418,000 |
|
| Total liabilities | 2,069,521,000 |
| | 1,632,212,000 |
|
| | | | |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
| |
|
| | | | |
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests (Note 12) | 44,105,000 |
| | 38,245,000 |
|
| | | | |
| Equity: | | | |
| Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 193,967,474 and 197,557,377 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | 1,939,000 |
| | 1,975,000 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,728,421,000 |
| | 1,765,840,000 |
|
| Accumulated deficit | (827,550,000 | ) | | (704,748,000 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (2,255,000 | ) | | (2,560,000 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 900,555,000 |
| | 1,060,507,000 |
|
| Noncontrolling interests (Note 13) | 158,108,000 |
| | 158,128,000 |
|
| Total equity | 1,058,663,000 |
| | 1,218,635,000 |
|
| Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity | $ | 3,172,289,000 |
| | $ | 2,889,092,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS — (Continued)
As of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018
___________
| |
| (1) | Such liabilities of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 represented liabilities of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP or its consolidated subsidiaries. Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP is a variable interest entity, or VIE, and a consolidated subsidiary of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. The creditors of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP or its consolidated subsidiaries do not have recourse against Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., except for the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit and 2016 Corporate Line of Credit, as defined in Note 8, held by Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP in the amount of $548,500,000$557,000,000 and $444,000,000$548,500,000 as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively, which is guaranteed by Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Resident fees and services | $ | 1,005,691,000 |
| | $ | 927,221,000 |
| | $ | 872,405,000 |
| $ | 1,099,078,000 |
| | $ | 1,005,691,000 |
| | $ | 927,221,000 |
|
| Real estate revenue | 129,569,000 |
| | 127,071,000 |
| | 117,166,000 |
| 124,038,000 |
| | 129,569,000 |
| | 127,071,000 |
|
| Total revenues | 1,135,260,000 |
| | 1,054,292,000 |
| | 989,571,000 |
| 1,223,116,000 |
| | 1,135,260,000 |
| | 1,054,292,000 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property operating expenses | 889,071,000 |
| | 806,439,000 |
| | 765,139,000 |
| 967,860,000 |
| | 889,071,000 |
| | 806,439,000 |
|
| Rental expenses | 34,823,000 |
| | 33,075,000 |
| | 29,394,000 |
| 33,859,000 |
| | 34,823,000 |
| | 33,075,000 |
|
| General and administrative | 28,770,000 |
| | 32,587,000 |
| | 28,951,000 |
| 29,749,000 |
| | 28,770,000 |
| | 32,587,000 |
|
| Acquisition related expenses | (2,913,000 | ) | | (3,833,000 | ) | | 28,589,000 |
| (161,000 | ) | | (2,913,000 | ) | | (3,833,000 | ) |
| Depreciation and amortization | 95,678,000 |
| | 113,226,000 |
| | 271,307,000 |
| 111,412,000 |
| | 95,678,000 |
| | 113,226,000 |
|
| Total expenses | 1,045,429,000 |
| | 981,494,000 |
| | 1,123,380,000 |
| 1,142,719,000 |
| | 1,045,429,000 |
| | 981,494,000 |
|
| Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishment) | (66,281,000 | ) | | (60,872,000 | ) | | (45,665,000 | ) | (78,553,000 | ) | | (66,281,000 | ) | | (60,872,000 | ) |
| (Loss) gain in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (1,949,000 | ) | | 383,000 |
| | 1,968,000 |
| (4,541,000 | ) | | (1,949,000 | ) | | 383,000 |
|
| Gain on dispositions of real estate investments | — |
| | 3,370,000 |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | 3,370,000 |
|
| Impairment of real estate investments | (2,542,000 | ) | | (14,070,000 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | (2,542,000 | ) | | (14,070,000 | ) |
| Loss from unconsolidated entities | (3,877,000 | ) | | (5,048,000 | ) | | (18,377,000 | ) | (2,097,000 | ) | | (3,877,000 | ) | | (5,048,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency (loss) gain | (2,690,000 | ) | | 4,045,000 |
| | (8,755,000 | ) | |
| Foreign currency gain (loss) | | 1,730,000 |
| | (2,690,000 | ) | | 4,045,000 |
|
| Other income | 1,248,000 |
| | 1,517,000 |
| | 1,085,000 |
| 3,736,000 |
| | 1,248,000 |
| | 1,517,000 |
|
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 13,740,000 |
| | 2,123,000 |
| | (203,553,000 | ) | |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | 797,000 |
| | 3,227,000 |
| | (343,000 | ) | |
| Net income (loss) | 14,537,000 |
| | 5,350,000 |
| | (203,896,000 | ) | |
| Income before income taxes | | 672,000 |
| | 13,740,000 |
| | 2,123,000 |
|
| Income tax (expense) benefit | | (1,524,000 | ) | | 797,000 |
| | 3,227,000 |
|
| Net (loss) income | | (852,000 | ) | | 14,537,000 |
| | 5,350,000 |
|
| Less: net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | (1,240,000 | ) | | 5,872,000 |
| | 57,862,000 |
| (4,113,000 | ) | | (1,240,000 | ) | | 5,872,000 |
|
| Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest | $ | 13,297,000 |
| | $ | 11,222,000 |
| | $ | (146,034,000 | ) | |
| Net income (loss) per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | (0.75 | ) | |
| Net (loss) income attributable to controlling interest | | $ | (4,965,000 | ) | | $ | 13,297,000 |
| | $ | 11,222,000 |
|
| Net (loss) income per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.06 |
|
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 199,953,936 |
| | 198,234,677 |
| | 194,199,931 |
| 196,342,873 |
| | 199,953,936 |
| | 198,234,677 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
| | $ | (203,896,000 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (852,000 | ) | | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | (589,000 | ) | | 1,058,000 |
| | (2,523,000 | ) | 305,000 |
| | (589,000 | ) | | 1,058,000 |
|
| Total other comprehensive (loss) income | (589,000 | ) | | 1,058,000 |
| | (2,523,000 | ) | |
| Comprehensive income (loss) | 13,948,000 |
| | 6,408,000 |
| | (206,419,000 | ) | |
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | | 305,000 |
| | (589,000 | ) | | 1,058,000 |
|
| Comprehensive (loss) income | | (547,000 | ) | | 13,948,000 |
| | 6,408,000 |
|
| Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | (1,240,000 | ) | | 5,872,000 |
| | 57,862,000 |
| (4,113,000 | ) | | (1,240,000 | ) | | 5,872,000 |
|
| Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling interest | $ | 12,708,000 |
| | $ | 12,280,000 |
| | $ | (148,557,000 | ) | |
| Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to controlling interest | | $ | (4,660,000 | ) | | $ | 12,708,000 |
| | $ | 12,280,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
| | | | Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | Stockholders’ Equity | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | Common Stock | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Amount | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Equity | Number of Shares | | Amount | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Equity |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2015 | 191,135,158 |
| | $ | 1,911,000 |
| | $ | 1,718,423,000 |
| | $ | (227,715,000 | ) | | $ | (506,000 | ) | | $ | 1,492,113,000 |
| | $ | 191,145,000 |
| | $ | 1,683,258,000 |
| |
| Offering costs — common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (11,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (11,000 | ) | | — |
| | (11,000 | ) | |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | 6,861,647 |
| | 69,000 |
| | 64,535,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 64,604,000 |
| | — |
| | 64,604,000 |
| |
| Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | 30,000 |
| | — |
| | 60,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 60,000 |
| | — |
| | 60,000 |
| |
| Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 136,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 136,000 |
| | — |
| | 136,000 |
| |
| Stock based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,329,000 |
| | 1,329,000 |
| |
| Repurchase of common stock | (2,246,766 | ) | | (23,000 | ) | | (20,918,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (20,941,000 | ) | | — |
| | (20,941,000 | ) | |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19,753,000 |
| | 19,753,000 |
| |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | — |
| | (244,000 | ) | | (244,000 | ) | |
| Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (845,000 | ) | | (845,000 | ) | |
| Fair value adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | (8,065,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (8,065,000 | ) | | (3,456,000 | ) | | (11,521,000 | ) | |
| Distributions declared ($0.60 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (116,549,000 | ) | | — |
| | (116,549,000 | ) | | — |
| | (116,549,000 | ) | |
| Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (146,034,000 | ) | | — |
| | (146,034,000 | ) | | (51,919,000 | ) | (1 | ) | (197,953,000 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,523,000 | ) | | (2,523,000 | ) | | — |
| | (2,523,000 | ) | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2016 | 195,780,039 |
| | $ | 1,957,000 |
| | $ | 1,754,160,000 |
| | $ | (490,298,000 | ) | | $ | (3,029,000 | ) | | $ | 1,262,790,000 |
| | $ | 155,763,000 |
| | $ | 1,418,553,000 |
| 195,780,039 |
| | $ | 1,957,000 |
| | $ | 1,754,160,000 |
| | $ | (490,298,000 | ) | | $ | (3,029,000 | ) | | $ | 1,262,790,000 |
| | $ | 155,763,000 |
| | $ | 1,418,553,000 |
|
| Offering costs — common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (12,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (12,000 | ) | | — |
| | (12,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (12,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (12,000 | ) | | — |
| | (12,000 | ) |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | 6,960,664 |
| | 70,000 |
| | 62,938,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 63,008,000 |
| | — |
| | 63,008,000 |
| 6,960,664 |
| | 70,000 |
| | 62,938,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 63,008,000 |
| | — |
| | 63,008,000 |
|
| Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | 22,500 |
| | — |
| | 40,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40,000 |
| | — |
| | 40,000 |
| 22,500 |
| | — |
| | 40,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40,000 |
| | — |
| | 40,000 |
|
| Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 176,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 176,000 |
| | — |
| | 176,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 176,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 176,000 |
| | — |
| | 176,000 |
|
| Stock based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 936,000 |
| | 936,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 936,000 |
| | 936,000 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | (3,419,969 | ) | | (34,000 | ) | | (30,622,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (30,656,000 | ) | | — |
| | (30,656,000 | ) | (3,419,969 | ) | | (34,000 | ) | | (30,622,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (30,656,000 | ) | | — |
| | (30,656,000 | ) |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,754,000 |
| | 11,754,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,754,000 |
| | 11,754,000 |
|
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,466,000 | ) | | (3,466,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | — |
| | (3,466,000 | ) | | (3,466,000 | ) |
| Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (635,000 | ) | | (635,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (635,000 | ) | | (635,000 | ) |
| Fair value adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | (808,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (808,000 | ) | | (347,000 | ) | | (1,155,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (808,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (808,000 | ) | | (347,000 | ) | | (1,155,000 | ) |
| Distributions declared ($0.60 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (118,968,000 | ) | | — |
| | (118,968,000 | ) | | — |
| | (118,968,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (118,968,000 | ) | | — |
| | (118,968,000 | ) | | — |
| | (118,968,000 | ) |
| Net income (loss) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,222,000 |
| | — |
| | 11,222,000 |
| | (5,280,000 | ) | (1 | ) | 5,942,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,222,000 |
| | — |
| | 11,222,000 |
| | (5,280,000 | ) | (1 | ) | 5,942,000 |
|
| Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,058,000 |
| | 1,058,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,058,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,058,000 |
| | 1,058,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,058,000 |
|
| BALANCE — December 31, 2017 | 199,343,234 |
| | $ | 1,993,000 |
| | $ | 1,785,872,000 |
| | $ | (598,044,000 | ) | | $ | (1,971,000 | ) | | $ | 1,187,850,000 |
| | $ | 158,725,000 |
| | $ | 1,346,575,000 |
| 199,343,234 |
| | $ | 1,993,000 |
| | $ | 1,785,872,000 |
| | $ | (598,044,000 | ) | | $ | (1,971,000 | ) | | $ | 1,187,850,000 |
| | $ | 158,725,000 |
| | $ | 1,346,575,000 |
|
| Offering costs — common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (7,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (7,000 | ) | | — |
| | (7,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (7,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (7,000 | ) | | — |
| | (7,000 | ) |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | 6,464,432 |
| | 65,000 |
| | 59,965,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 60,030,000 |
| | — |
| | 60,030,000 |
| 6,464,432 |
| | 65,000 |
| | 59,965,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 60,030,000 |
| | — |
| | 60,030,000 |
|
| Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | 22,500 |
| | — |
| | 41,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 41,000 |
| | — |
| | 41,000 |
| 22,500 |
| | — |
| | 41,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 41,000 |
| | — |
| | 41,000 |
|
| Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 174,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 174,000 |
| | — |
| | 174,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 174,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 174,000 |
| | — |
| | 174,000 |
|
| Stock based compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,898,000 |
| | 2,898,000 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | | (8,272,789 | ) | | (83,000 | ) | | (76,494,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (76,577,000 | ) | | — |
| | (76,577,000 | ) |
| Contribution from noncontrolling interest | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,470,000 |
| | 4,470,000 |
|
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6,701,000 | ) | | (6,701,000 | ) |
| Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (780,000 | ) | | (780,000 | ) |
| Fair value adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,711,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,711,000 | ) | | (1,590,000 | ) | | (5,301,000 | ) |
| Distributions declared ($0.60 per share) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (120,001,000 | ) | | — |
| | (120,001,000 | ) | | — |
| | (120,001,000 | ) |
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,297,000 |
| | — |
| | 13,297,000 |
| | 1,106,000 |
| (1 | ) | 14,403,000 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (589,000 | ) | | (589,000 | ) | | — |
| | (589,000 | ) |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2018 | | 197,557,377 |
| | $ | 1,975,000 |
| | $ | 1,765,840,000 |
| | $ | (704,748,000 | ) | | $ | (2,560,000 | ) | | $ | 1,060,507,000 |
| | $ | 158,128,000 |
| | $ | 1,218,635,000 |
|
| Offering costs — common stock | | — |
| | — |
| | (91,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (91,000 | ) | | — |
| | (91,000 | ) |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | | 5,913,684 |
| | 59,000 |
| | 55,381,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 55,440,000 |
| | — |
| | 55,440,000 |
|
| Issuance of vested and nonvested restricted common stock | | 22,500 |
| | — |
| | 42,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 42,000 |
| | — |
| | 42,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY — (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
| | | | Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | Stockholders’ Equity | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | Common Stock | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Amount | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Equity | Number of Shares | | Amount | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Accumulated Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total Stockholders’ Equity | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total Equity |
| Amortization of nonvested common stock compensation | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 173,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 173,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 173,000 |
|
| Stock based compensation | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,898,000 |
| | $ | 2,898,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,698,000 |
| | 2,698,000 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | (8,272,789 | ) | | (83,000 | ) | | (76,494,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (76,577,000 | ) | | — |
| | (76,577,000 | ) | (9,526,087 | ) | | (95,000 | ) | | (89,793,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (89,888,000 | ) | | — |
| | (89,888,000 | ) |
| Contribution from noncontrolling interest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,470,000 |
| | 4,470,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,000,000 |
| | 3,000,000 |
|
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6,701,000 | ) | | (6,701,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (7,272,000 | ) | | (7,272,000 | ) |
| Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (780,000 | ) | | (780,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (780,000 | ) | | (780,000 | ) |
| Fair value adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | (3,711,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,711,000 | ) | | (1,590,000 | ) | | (5,301,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (3,131,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,131,000 | ) | | (1,342,000 | ) | | (4,473,000 | ) |
| Distributions declared ($0.60 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (120,001,000 | ) | | — |
| | (120,001,000 | ) | | — |
| | (120,001,000 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (117,837,000 | ) | | — |
| | (117,837,000 | ) | | — |
| | (117,837,000 | ) |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,297,000 |
| | — |
| | 13,297,000 |
| | 1,106,000 |
| (1 | ) | 14,403,000 |
| |
| Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (589,000 | ) | | (589,000 | ) | | — |
| | (589,000 | ) | |
| BALANCE — December 31, 2018 | 197,557,377 |
| | $ | 1,975,000 |
| | $ | 1,765,840,000 |
| | $ | (704,748,000 | ) | | $ | (2,560,000 | ) | | $ | 1,060,507,000 |
| | $ | 158,128,000 |
| | $ | 1,218,635,000 |
| |
| Net (loss) income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4,965,000 | ) | | — |
| | (4,965,000 | ) | | 3,676,000 |
| (1 | ) | (1,289,000 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 305,000 |
| | 305,000 |
| | — |
| | 305,000 |
|
| BALANCE — December 31, 2019 | | 193,967,474 |
| | $ | 1,939,000 |
| | $ | 1,728,421,000 |
| | $ | (827,550,000 | ) | | $ | (2,255,000 | ) | | $ | 900,555,000 |
| | $ | 158,108,000 |
| | $ | 1,058,663,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016,2017, amounts exclude $437,000, $134,000, $(592,000) and $(5,943,000)$(592,000), respectively, of net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, for a further discussion. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
| | $ | (203,896,000 | ) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | | $ | (852,000 | ) | | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 5,350,000 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 95,678,000 |
| | 113,226,000 |
| | 271,307,000 |
| 111,412,000 |
| | 95,678,000 |
| | 113,226,000 |
|
| Other amortization (deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium, above/below-market leases, leasehold interests and real estate-related investment costs and accretion) | 4,918,000 |
| | 5,737,000 |
| | 4,598,000 |
| |
| Other amortization | | 29,740,000 |
| | 4,918,000 |
| | 5,737,000 |
|
| Deferred rent | (4,841,000 | ) | | (5,289,000 | ) | | (10,733,000 | ) | (3,264,000 | ) | | (4,841,000 | ) | | (5,289,000 | ) |
| Stock based compensation | 3,026,000 |
| | 986,000 |
| | 1,620,000 |
| 2,744,000 |
| | 3,026,000 |
| | 986,000 |
|
Stock based compensation — nonvested restricted common stock | 215,000 |
| | 216,000 |
| | 196,000 |
| 215,000 |
| | 215,000 |
| | 216,000 |
|
| Loss from unconsolidated entities | 3,877,000 |
| | 5,048,000 |
| | 18,377,000 |
| 2,097,000 |
| | 3,877,000 |
| | 5,048,000 |
|
| Bad debt expense, net | 490,000 |
| | 6,674,000 |
| | 4,105,000 |
| |
| Gain on real estate dispositions | — |
| | (3,370,000 | ) | | — |
| |
| Foreign currency loss (gain) | 2,658,000 |
| | (4,009,000 | ) | | 8,452,000 |
| |
| Loss on extinguishment of mortgage loan payable | — |
| | 1,432,000 |
| | — |
| |
| Bad debt expense | | 991,000 |
| | 490,000 |
| | 6,674,000 |
|
| Gain on dispositions of real estate | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,370,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency (gain) loss | | (1,731,000 | ) | | 2,658,000 |
| | (4,009,000 | ) |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | | 2,968,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,432,000 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | | 964,000 |
| | (1,854,000 | ) | | (3,771,000 | ) |
| Contingent consideration related to acquisition of real estate | (93,000 | ) | | — |
| | (9,405,000 | ) | — |
| | (93,000 | ) | | — |
|
| Change in fair value of contingent consideration | (2,843,000 | ) | | (3,885,000 | ) | | 13,430,000 |
| (681,000 | ) | | (2,843,000 | ) | | (3,885,000 | ) |
| Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 1,949,000 |
| | (383,000 | ) | | (1,968,000 | ) | 4,541,000 |
| | 1,949,000 |
| | (383,000 | ) |
| Impairment of real estate investments | 2,542,000 |
| | 14,070,000 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 2,542,000 |
| | 14,070,000 |
|
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts and other receivables | (7,221,000 | ) | | (17,132,000 | ) | | (2,244,000 | ) | (23,426,000 | ) | | (7,221,000 | ) | | (17,132,000 | ) |
| Other assets | (17,897,000 | ) | | (5,145,000 | ) | | (22,918,000 | ) | (6,537,000 | ) | | (15,317,000 | ) | | (6,558,000 | ) |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 8,188,000 |
| | 18,790,000 |
| | 34,551,000 |
| 18,103,000 |
| | 8,187,000 |
| | 18,790,000 |
|
| Accounts payable due to affiliates | (26,000 | ) | | (151,000 | ) | | 813,000 |
| 121,000 |
| | (26,000 | ) | | (151,000 | ) |
| Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities | 1,657,000 |
| | (4,062,000 | ) | | 8,072,000 |
| |
| Security deposits, prepaid rent, operating lease and other liabilities | | (19,951,000 | ) | | 932,000 |
| | 1,122,000 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 106,814,000 |
| | 128,103,000 |
| | 114,357,000 |
| 117,454,000 |
| | 106,814,000 |
| | 128,103,000 |
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisitions of real estate investments | (67,285,000 | ) | | (123,088,000 | ) | | (299,448,000 | ) | |
| Proceeds from real estate dispositions | 1,000,000 |
| | 15,993,000 |
| | — |
| |
| Advances on real estate notes receivable | — |
| | — |
| | (1,942,000 | ) | |
| Acquisitions of real estate and other investments | | (37,863,000 | ) | | (67,285,000 | ) | | (123,088,000 | ) |
| Proceeds from dispositions of real estate and other investments | | 1,227,000 |
| | 1,000,000 |
| | 15,993,000 |
|
| Principal repayments on real estate notes receivable | 1,799,000 |
| | 29,478,000 |
| | — |
| 28,650,000 |
| | 1,799,000 |
| | 29,478,000 |
|
| Loan costs on real estate notes receivable | — |
| | — |
| | (39,000 | ) | |
| Lease inducement | — |
| | — |
| | (5,000,000 | ) | |
| Investments in unconsolidated entities | (2,050,000 | ) | | (2,250,000 | ) | | (3,304,000 | ) | (1,640,000 | ) | | (2,050,000 | ) | | (2,250,000 | ) |
| Capital expenditures | (66,907,000 | ) | | (43,553,000 | ) | | (45,985,000 | ) | (92,836,000 | ) | | (66,907,000 | ) | | (43,553,000 | ) |
| Real estate and other deposits | (2,329,000 | ) | | (1,218,000 | ) | | 2,968,000 |
| (650,000 | ) | | (2,329,000 | ) | | (1,218,000 | ) |
| Proceeds from insurance settlements | — |
| | 87,000 |
| | 63,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 87,000 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (135,772,000 | ) | | (124,551,000 | ) | | (352,687,000 | ) | (103,112,000 | ) | | (135,772,000 | ) | | (124,551,000 | ) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | |
| Borrowings under mortgage loans payable | 181,594,000 |
| | 230,611,000 |
| | 3,563,000 |
| 191,246,000 |
| | 181,594,000 |
| | 230,611,000 |
|
| Payments on mortgage loans payable | (10,444,000 | ) | | (8,524,000 | ) | | (5,769,000 | ) | (74,037,000 | ) | | (10,444,000 | ) | | (8,524,000 | ) |
| Pay-off of mortgage loans payable | (94,449,000 | ) | | (100,775,000 | ) | | — |
| |
| Payoff of mortgage loans payable | | (14,022,000 | ) | | (94,449,000 | ) | | (100,775,000 | ) |
| Borrowings under the lines of credit and term loans | 273,639,000 |
| | 318,474,000 |
| | 558,769,000 |
| 1,030,653,000 |
| | 273,639,000 |
| | 318,474,000 |
|
| Payments on the lines of credit and term loans | (159,716,000 | ) | | (343,666,000 | ) | | (259,452,000 | ) | (952,822,000 | ) | | (159,716,000 | ) | | (343,666,000 | ) |
| Purchases of derivative financial instruments | (153,000 | ) | | — |
| | (15,000 | ) | |
| Payments of financing obligations and other obligations | | (7,850,000 | ) | | (8,055,000 | ) | | (6,631,000 | ) |
| Purchase of derivative financial instruments | | — |
| | (153,000 | ) | | — |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Deferred financing costs | $ | (4,177,000 | ) | | $ | (5,847,000 | ) | | $ | (10,979,000 | ) | $ | (12,945,000 | ) | | $ | (4,177,000 | ) | | $ | (5,847,000 | ) |
| Mortgage loan payable extinguishment costs | — |
| | (493,000 | ) | | — |
| |
| Debt extinguishment costs | | (870,000 | ) | | — |
| | (493,000 | ) |
| Contingent consideration related to acquisition of real estate | (1,490,000 | ) | | — |
| | (945,000 | ) | — |
| | (1,490,000 | ) | | — |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | (76,577,000 | ) | | (30,656,000 | ) | | (20,941,000 | ) | (89,888,000 | ) | | (76,577,000 | ) | | (30,656,000 | ) |
| Repurchase of stock warrants and redeemable noncontrolling interests | (306,000 | ) | | (206,000 | ) | | — |
| (475,000 | ) | | (306,000 | ) | | (206,000 | ) |
| Payments under financing, capital lease and other obligations | (8,055,000 | ) | | (6,631,000 | ) | | (7,600,000 | ) | |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | 4,470,000 |
| | 8,304,000 |
| | 19,753,000 |
| 3,000,000 |
| | 4,470,000 |
| | 8,304,000 |
|
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | (6,701,000 | ) | | (16,000 | ) | | (244,000 | ) | (7,272,000 | ) | | (6,701,000 | ) | | (16,000 | ) |
| Contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests | 535,000 |
| | 975,000 |
| | 2,295,000 |
| 2,000,000 |
| | 535,000 |
| | 975,000 |
|
| Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests | (711,000 | ) | | (1,184,000 | ) | | (198,000 | ) | (1,430,000 | ) | | (711,000 | ) | | (1,184,000 | ) |
| Security deposits and other | 112,000 |
| | 176,000 |
| | 100,000 |
| 12,000 |
| | 112,000 |
| | 176,000 |
|
| Distributions paid | (59,974,000 | ) | | (55,777,000 | ) | | (51,681,000 | ) | (62,612,000 | ) | | (59,974,000 | ) | | (55,777,000 | ) |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 37,597,000 |
| | 4,765,000 |
| | 226,656,000 |
| 2,688,000 |
| | 37,597,000 |
| | 4,765,000 |
|
| NET CHANGE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | 8,639,000 |
| | 8,317,000 |
| | (11,674,000 | ) | $ | 17,030,000 |
| | $ | 8,639,000 |
| | $ | 8,317,000 |
|
| EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ON CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | (77,000 | ) | | 149,000 |
| | (140,000 | ) | 145,000 |
| | (77,000 | ) | | 149,000 |
|
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH — Beginning of period | 64,143,000 |
| | 55,677,000 |
| | 67,491,000 |
| 72,705,000 |
| | 64,143,000 |
| | 55,677,000 |
|
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH — End of period | $ | 72,705,000 |
| | $ | 64,143,000 |
| | $ | 55,677,000 |
| $ | 89,880,000 |
| | $ | 72,705,000 |
| | $ | 64,143,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| RECONCILIATION OF CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 33,656,000 |
| | $ | 29,123,000 |
| | $ | 48,953,000 |
| $ | 35,132,000 |
| | $ | 33,656,000 |
| | $ | 29,123,000 |
|
| Restricted cash | $ | 30,487,000 |
| | $ | 26,554,000 |
| | $ | 18,538,000 |
| 37,573,000 |
| | 30,487,000 |
| | 26,554,000 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 64,143,000 |
| | $ | 55,677,000 |
| | $ | 67,491,000 |
| $ | 72,705,000 |
| | $ | 64,143,000 |
| | $ | 55,677,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| End of period: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 35,132,000 |
| | $ | 33,656,000 |
| | $ | 29,123,000 |
| $ | 53,149,000 |
| | $ | 35,132,000 |
| | $ | 33,656,000 |
|
| Restricted cash | $ | 37,573,000 |
| | $ | 30,487,000 |
| | $ | 26,554,000 |
| 36,731,000 |
| | 37,573,000 |
| | 30,487,000 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 72,705,000 |
| | $ | 64,143,000 |
| | $ | 55,677,000 |
| $ | 89,880,000 |
| | $ | 72,705,000 |
| | $ | 64,143,000 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid for: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest (including interest on capital leases) | $ | 59,365,000 |
| | $ | 52,340,000 |
| | $ | 46,839,000 |
| |
| Interest | | $ | 68,654,000 |
| | $ | 59,365,000 |
| | $ | 52,340,000 |
|
| Income taxes | $ | 1,647,000 |
| | $ | 621,000 |
| | $ | 409,000 |
| $ | 921,000 |
| | $ | 1,647,000 |
| | $ | 621,000 |
|
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued capital expenditures | $ | 12,616,000 |
| | $ | 6,106,000 |
| | $ | 5,104,000 |
| $ | 25,194,000 |
| | $ | 12,616,000 |
| | $ | 6,106,000 |
|
| Capital expenditures from financing and capital lease obligations | $ | 16,809,000 |
| | $ | 5,009,000 |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Real estate deposit | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,809,000 |
| |
| Settlement of receivable for investment in unconsolidated entities | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 12,573,000 |
| |
| Capital expenditures from financing obligations | | $ | 11,821,000 |
| | $ | 16,809,000 |
| | $ | 5,009,000 |
|
| Tenant improvement overage | $ | 1,373,000 |
| | $ | 325,000 |
| | $ | 1,260,000 |
| $ | 1,216,000 |
| | $ | 1,373,000 |
| | $ | 325,000 |
|
| Investments in unconsolidated entity | | $ | 5,276,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Disposition of real estate investment | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,400,000 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,400,000 |
|
| Principal repayments of real estate notes receivable | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 24,110,000 |
| |
| Properties received in settlement of real estate notes receivable | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 23,531,000 |
| |
| Exercise purchase options — attributable to intangible asset | $ | — |
| | $ | 12,290,000 |
| | $ | 56,792,000 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 12,290,000 |
|
| Reduction of financing and capital lease obligations, net | $ | — |
| | $ | 27,483,000 |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Reduction of financing obligations, net | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 27,483,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — (Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| The following represents the increase (decrease) in certain assets and liabilities in connection with our acquisitions and dispositions of real estate investments: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other receivables | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,155,000 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,155,000 |
|
| Other assets, net | $ | (1,587,000 | ) | | $ | 2,450,000 |
| | $ | 345,000 |
| |
| Mortgage loans payable, net | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 205,386,000 |
| |
| Other assets | | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,587,000 | ) | | $ | 2,450,000 |
|
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 58,000 |
| | $ | 2,062,000 |
| | $ | 309,000 |
| $ | 46,000 |
| | $ | 58,000 |
| | $ | 2,062,000 |
|
| Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities | $ | 223,000 |
| | $ | 2,323,000 |
| | $ | 9,774,000 |
| $ | 105,000 |
| | $ | 223,000 |
| | $ | 2,323,000 |
|
| Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuance of common stock under the DRIP | $ | 60,030,000 |
| | $ | 63,008,000 |
| | $ | 64,604,000 |
| $ | 55,440,000 |
| | $ | 60,030,000 |
| | $ | 63,008,000 |
|
| Equipment acquired through capital lease obligations | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,598,000 |
| |
| Distributions declared but not paid | $ | 10,189,000 |
| | $ | 10,192,000 |
| | $ | 10,009,000 |
| $ | 9,974,000 |
| | $ | 10,189,000 |
| | $ | 10,192,000 |
|
| Reclassification of noncontrolling interests to mezzanine equity | $ | 780,000 |
| | $ | 635,000 |
| | $ | 845,000 |
| $ | 780,000 |
| | $ | 780,000 |
| | $ | 635,000 |
|
| Accrued deferred financing costs | $ | 96,000 |
| | $ | 2,000 |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Settlement of mortgage loan payable | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,040,000 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,040,000 |
|
| Contribution from noncontrolling interest | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,450,000 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,450,000 |
|
| Distribution to noncontrolling interest | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,450,000 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,450,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
The use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, except where the context otherwise requires.noted.
1. Organization and Description of Business
Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was incorporated on January 11, 2013 and therefore, we consider that our date of inception. We were initially capitalized on January 15, 2013. We invest in a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. We also operate healthcare-related facilities utilizing the structure permitted by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007, which is commonly referred to as a “RIDEA” structure (the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, authorizing the RIDEA structure were enacted as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008). We also originate and acquire secured loans and may also originate and acquire other real estate-related investments on an infrequent and opportunistic basis. We generally seek investments that produce current income. We qualified to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Code for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014, and we intend to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT.
On February 26, 2014, we commenced a best efforts initial public offering, or our initial offering, in which we offered to the public up to $1,900,000,000 in shares of our common stock. As of April 22, 2015, the deregistration date of our initial offering, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our initial offering for 184,930,598 shares of our common stock, or $1,842,618,000, excluding shares of our common stock issued pursuant to our initial distribution reinvestment plan, or the Initial DRIP. As of April 22, 2015, a total of $18,511,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 1,948,563 shares of our common stock being issued pursuant to the Initial DRIP. See Note 13, Equity — Common Stock, for a further discussion.
On March 25, 2015, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, to register a maximum of $250,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the Initial DRIP, or the 2015 DRIP Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering following the deregistration of our initial offering. See Note 13, Equity, forEffective October 5, 2016, we amended and restated the Initial DRIP, or the Amended and Restated DRIP, to amend the price at which shares of our common stock are issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering. We continued to offer shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering until the termination and deregistration of such offering on March 29, 2019. As of March 29, 2019, a further discussion.total of $245,396,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 26,386,545 shares of common stock being issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering.
On January 30, 2019, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to register a maximum of $200,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the Amended and Restated DRIP, or the 2019 DRIP Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering on April 1, 2019, following the deregistration of the 2015 DRIP Offering. As of December 31, 2019, a total of $41,244,000 in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 4,398,586 shares of common stock being issued pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering. We collectively refer to the Initial DRIP portion of our initial offering, the 2015 DRIP Offering and the 20152019 DRIP Offering as our DRIP Offerings. As of December 31, 2018,See Note 13, Equity — Distribution Reinvestment Plan, for a total of $231,200,000 in distributions were reinvested and 24,871,447 shares of our common stock were issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering.further discussion.
We conduct substantially all of our operations through Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, or our operating partnership. We are externally advised by Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Advisor, LLC, or Griffin-American Advisor, or our advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement, or the Advisory Agreement, between us and our advisor. The Advisory Agreement was effective as of February 26, 2014 and had a one-year initial term, subject to successive one-year renewals upon the mutual consent of the parties. The Advisory Agreement was last renewed pursuant to the mutual consent of the parties on February 13, 201911, 2020 and expires on February 26, 2020.2021. Our advisor uses its best efforts, subject to the oversight, review and approval of our board of directors, or our board, to, among other things, research, identify, review and make investments in and dispositions of properties and securities on our behalf consistent with our investment policies and objectives. Our advisor performs its duties and responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement as our fiduciary. Our advisor is 75.0% owned and managed by wholly owned subsidiaries of American Healthcare Investors, LLC, or American Healthcare Investors, and 25.0% owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of Griffin Capital Company, LLC, or Griffin Capital, or collectively, our co-sponsors. American Healthcare Investors is 47.1% owned by AHI Group Holdings, LLC, or AHI Group Holdings, 45.1% indirectly owned by Colony Capital, Inc. (NYSE: CLNY), or Colony Capital, and 7.8% owned by James F. Flaherty III, a former partner of Colony Capital. We are not affiliated with Griffin Capital, Griffin Capital Securities, LLC, the dealer manager for our initial offering, or our dealer manager, Colony Capital or Mr. Flaherty; however, we are affiliated with Griffin-American Advisor, American Healthcare Investors and AHI Group Holdings.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We currently operate through six reportable business segments: medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEA and integrated senior health campuses. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we owned and/or operated 9798 properties, comprising 101102 buildings, and 112118 integrated senior health campuses including completed development projects, or approximately 13,251,00013,836,000 square feet of gross leasable area, or GLA, for an aggregate contract purchase price of $2,940,990,000.$3,001,462,000. In addition, as of December 31, 2018,2019, we had invested $89,079,000 inalso owned a real estate-related investments, net of principal repayments.investment purchased for $60,429,000.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding our accompanying consolidated financial statements. Such consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto are the representations of our management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Basis of Presentation
Our accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our operating partnership, the wholly owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership and all non-wholly owned subsidiaries in which we have control, as well as any variable interest entities, or VIEs, in which we are the primary beneficiary. We evaluate our ability to control an entity, and whether the entity is a VIE and we are the primary beneficiary, by considering substantive terms of the arrangement and identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 810, Consolidation, or ASC Topic 810.performance.
We operate and intend to continue to operate in an umbrella partnership REIT structure in which our operating partnership, or wholly owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership and all non-wholly owned subsidiaries of which we have control, will own substantially all of the interests in properties acquired on our behalf. We are the sole general partner of our operating partnership, and as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we owned greater than a 99.99% general partnership interest therein. AsOur advisor is a limited partner, and as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017, our advisor2018, owned less than a 0.01% noncontrolling limited partnership interest in our operating partnership.
Because we are the sole general partner of our operating partnership and have unilateral control over its management and major operating decisions (even if additional limited partners are admitted to our operating partnership), the accounts of our operating partnership are consolidated in our accompanying consolidated financial statements. All intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of our consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, the initial and recurring valuation of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed through property acquisitions, allowance for uncollectible accounts, impairment of long-lived assets and contingencies. These estimates are made and evaluated on an on-going basis using information that is currently available as well as various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates, perhaps in material adverse ways, and those estimates could be different under different assumptions or conditions.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Restricted cash primarily comprises lender required accounts for property taxes, tenant improvements, capital improvements and insurance, which are restricted as to use or withdrawal.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Leases
On January 1, 2019, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 842, Leases, or ASC Topic 842. ASC Topic 842 supersedes ASC Topic 840, Leases, or ASC Topic 840. We adopted ASC Topic 842 using the modified retrospective approach whereby the cumulative effect of adoption was recognized on the adoption date and prior periods were not restated. There was no net cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2019 as a result of this adoption. Therefore, with respect to our leases as both lessees and lessors, information is presented under ASC Topic 842 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and under ASC Topic 840 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. In addition, ASC Topic 842 provides a practical expedient package that allows an entity to not reassess the following upon adoption (must be elected as a group): (i) whether an expired or existing contract contains a lease arrangement; (ii) the lease classification related to expired or existing lease arrangements; or (iii) whether costs incurred on expired or existing leases qualify as initial direct costs. We elected such practical expedient package upon our adoption of ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019. We determine if a contract is a lease upon inception of the lease. We maintain a distinction between finance and operating leases, which is substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the previous lease guidance.
Lessee: Pursuant to ASC Topic 842, lessees are required to recognize the following for all leases with terms greater than 12 months at the commencement date: (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease; and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The lease liability is calculated by using either the implicit rate of the lease or the incremental borrowing rate. As a result of the adoption of ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019, we recognized an initial amount of operating lease liabilities of $198,453,000 in our consolidated balance sheet for all of our operating leases for which we are the lessee, including facilities leases and ground leases. In addition, we recorded corresponding right-of-use assets of $211,679,000, which represent the lease liabilities, net of the existing prepaid rent asset and accrued straight-line rent liabilities and adjusted for unamortized above/below market ground lease intangibles. The accretion of lease liabilities and amortization expense on right-of-use assets for our operating leases are included in rental expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Operating lease liabilities are calculated using our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available as of the lease commencement date.
The accounting for our existing capital (finance) leases upon adoption of ASC Topic 842 remains substantially unchanged. For our finance leases, the accretion of lease liabilities are included in interest expense and the amortization expense on right-of-use assets are included in depreciation and amortization in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Further, finance lease assets are included within real estate investments, net and finance lease liabilities are included within financing obligations in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Lessor: Pursuant to ASC Topic 842, lessors bifurcate lease revenues into lease components and non-lease components and separately recognize and disclose non-lease components that are executory in nature. Lease components continue to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and certain non-lease components may be accounted for under the new revenue recognition guidance in ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASC Topic 606. See the “Revenue Recognition” section below. ASC Topic 842 also provides for a practical expedient package that permits lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component if certain conditions are met. Such practical expedient is limited to circumstances in which: (i) the timing and pattern of transfer are the same for the non-lease component and the related lease component; and (ii) the lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease. In addition, such practical expedient causes an entity to assess whether a contract is predominately lease or service based, and recognize the revenue from the entire contract under the relevant accounting guidance. Effective upon our adoption of ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019, we continue to recognize revenue for our medical office buildings, senior housing, skilled nursing facilities and hospitals segments as real estate revenue. Minimum annual rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease (including rent holidays). Differences between real estate revenue recognized and cash amounts contractually due from tenants under the lease agreements are recorded to deferred rent receivable, which is included in other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Tenant reimbursement revenue, which comprises additional amounts recoverable from tenants for common area maintenance expenses and certain other recoverable expenses, are considered non-lease components and variable lease payments. We qualified for and elected the practical expedient as outlined above to combine the non-lease component with the lease component, which is the predominant component, and therefore the non-lease component is recognized as part of real estate revenue. In addition, as lessors, we exclude certain lessor costs (i.e., property taxes and insurance) paid directly by a lessee to third parties on our behalf from our measurement of variable lease revenue and associated expense (i.e., no gross up of revenue and expense for these costs); and include lessor costs that we paid and are reimbursed by the lessee in our measurement of variable lease revenue and associated expense (i.e., gross up revenue
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
and expense for these costs). Therefore, we no longer record revenue or expense when the lessee pays the property taxes and insurance directly to a third party.
Our senior housing — RIDEA facilities offer residents room and board (lease component), standard meals and healthcare services (non-lease component), and certain ancillary services that are not contemplated in the lease with each resident (i.e., laundry, guest meals, etc.). For our senior housing — RIDEA facilities, we recognize revenue under ASC Topic 606 as resident fees and services, based on our predominance assessment from electing the practical expedient outlined above. See the “Revenue Recognition” section below.
See Note 17, Leases, for a further discussion.
Revenue Recognition
Prior to January 1, 2018, we recognized revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, or ASC Topic 605. ASC Topic 605 requires that all four of the following basic criteria be met before revenue is realized or realizable and earned: (i) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (iii) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASC Topic 606, applying the modified retrospective method. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for the prior period. The adoption of ASC Topic 606 did not have a material impact on the measurement nor on the recognition of revenue as of January 1, 2018; therefore, no cumulative adjustment has beenwas made to the opening balance of retained earnings at the beginning of 2018.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Real estate revenueEstate Revenue
In accordance with ASC Topic 840, Leases,Prior to January 1, 2019, minimum annual rental revenue iswas recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease (including rent holidays). in accordance with ASC Topic 840. Differences between real estate revenue recognized and cash amounts contractually due from tenants under the lease agreements arewere recorded to deferred rent receivable or deferred rent liability, as applicable.receivable. Tenant reimbursement revenue which comprises additional amounts recoverable from tenants for common area maintenance expenses and certain other recoverable expenses, was recognized as revenue in the period in which the related expenses were incurred. Tenant reimbursements were recognized and presented in accordance with ASC Subtopic 606-10-55-36, Revenue Recognition— Principal Versus Agent Consideration,or ASC Subtopic 606. ASC Subtopic 606 requires that these reimbursements be recorded on a gross basis as we are generally primarily responsible to fulfill the promise to provide specified goods and services. We recognized lease termination fees at such time when there was a signed termination letter agreement, all of the conditions of such agreement havehad been met and the tenant iswas no longer occupying the property.
OnEffective January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2016-02, Leases, or ASU 2016-02, and its amendments. For a further discussion of ASU 2016-02 and its amendments, see “Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements” below.recognize real estate revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 842. See the “Leases” section above.
Resident feesFees and services revenueServices Revenue
A significant portion of resident fees and services revenue represents healthcare service revenue that is reported at the amount that we expect to be entitled to in exchange for providing patient care. These amounts are due from patients, third-party payors (including health insurers and government programs), other healthcare facilities, and others and includes variable consideration for retroactive revenue adjustments due to settlement of audits, reviews, and investigations. Generally, we bill the patients, third-party payors and other healthcare facilities several days after the services are performed. Revenue is recognized as performance obligations are satisfied.
Performance obligations are determined based on the nature of the services provided by us. Revenue for performance obligations satisfied over time is recognized based on actual charges incurred in relation to total expected (or actual) charges. This method provides a depiction of the transfer of services over the term of the performance obligation based on the inputs needed to satisfy the obligation. Generally, performance obligations satisfied over time relate to patients receiving long-term healthcare services, including rehabilitation services. We measure the performance obligation from admission into the facility to the point when we are no longer required to provide services to that patient. Revenue for performance obligations satisfied at a point in time is recognized when goods or services are provided and we do not believe we are required to provide additional goods or services to the patient. Generally, performance obligations satisfied at a point in time relate to sales of our pharmaceuticals business or to sales of ancillary supplies.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Because all of its performance obligations relate to contracts with a duration of less than one year, we have elected to apply the optional exemption provided in FASB ASC 606-10-50-14(a) and, therefore, are not required to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period. The performance obligations for these contracts are generally completed within months of the end of the reporting period.
We determine the transaction price based on standard charges for goods and services provided, reduced, where applicable, by contractual adjustments provided to third-party payors, implicit price concessions provided to uninsured patients, and estimates of goods to be returned. We also determine the estimates of contractual adjustments based on Medicare and Medicaid pricing tables and historical experience. We determine the estimate of implicit price concessions based on the historical collection experience with each class of payor.
Agreements with third-party payors typically provide for payments at amounts less than established charges. A summary of the payment arrangements with major third-party payors follows:
Medicare: Certain healthcare services are paid at prospectively determined rates based on cost-reimbursement methodologies subject to certain limits.
Medicaid: Reimbursements for Medicaid services are generally paid at prospectively determined rates. In the state of Indiana, we participate in an Upper Payment Limit program, or IGT, with various county hospital partners, which provides supplemental Medicaid payments to skilled nursing facilities that are licensed to non-state, government-owned entities such as county hospital districts. We have operational responsibility through management agreements for facilities retained by the county hospital districts including this IGT.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Other: Payment agreements with certain commercial insurance carriers, health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations provide for payment using prospectively determined rates per discharge, discounts from established charges and prospectively determined periodic rates.
Laws and regulations concerning government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, are complex and subject to varying interpretation. As a result of investigations by governmental agencies, various healthcare organizations have received requests for information and notices regarding alleged noncompliance with those laws and regulations, which, in some instances, have resulted in organizations entering into significant settlement agreements. Compliance with such laws and regulations may also be subject to future government review and interpretation as well as significant regulatory action, including fines, penalties and potential exclusion from the related programs. There can be no assurance that regulatory authorities will not challenge our compliance with these laws and regulations, and it is not possible to determine the impact (if any) such claims or penalties would have upon us.
Settlements with third-party payors for retroactive adjustments due to audits, reviews or investigations are considered variable consideration and are included in the determination of the estimated transaction price for providing patient care. These settlements are estimated based on the terms of the payment agreement with the payor, correspondence from the payor and our historical settlement activity, including an assessment to ensure that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the retroactive adjustment is subsequently resolved. Estimated settlements are adjusted in future periods as adjustments become known (that is, new information becomes available), or as years are settled or are no longer subject to such audits, reviews and investigations. Adjustments arising from a change in the transaction price were not significant for the yearyears ended December 31, 2018.
In accordance with the disclosure requirements of the new revenue standard, the impact of the adoption of ASC Topic 606 on our consolidated statements of operations2019 and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2018 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| | | As Reported | | Balances Without Adoption of ASC Topic 606 | | Effect of Change Lower |
| Resident fees and services | | $ | 1,005,691,000 |
| | $ | 1,011,300,000 |
| | $ | (5,609,000 | ) |
| Property operating expenses | | $ | 889,071,000 |
| | $ | 889,135,000 |
| | $ | (64,000 | ) |
| General and administrative | | $ | 28,770,000 |
| | $ | 34,273,000 |
| | $ | (5,503,000 | ) |
| Net income | | $ | 14,537,000 |
| | $ | 14,579,000 |
| | $ | (42,000 | ) |
In accordance with the disclosure requirements of the new revenue standard, the impact of the adoption of ASC Topic 606 on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As Reported | | Balances Without Adoption of ASC Topic 606 | | Effect of Change Higher/(Lower) |
| Assets | | | | | | |
| Other assets, net | | $ | 114,226,000 |
| | $ | 114,162,000 |
| | $ | 64,000 |
|
| Liabilities | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 139,383,000 |
| | $ | 139,277,000 |
| | $ | 106,000 |
|
| Equity | | | | | | |
| Accumulated deficit | | $ | (704,748,000 | ) | | $ | (704,706,000 | ) | | $ | (42,000 | ) |
The change in reported balances is primarily based on the fact that substantially all of the amounts recorded to bad debt expense pursuant to our previous accounting policy in accordance with ASC Topic 605 are now recorded as direct reductions of resident fees and services revenue as contractual adjustments provided to third-party payors or implicit price concessions pursuant to the new revenue standard, ASC Topic 606.2018.
Disaggregation of Resident Fees and Services Revenue
We disaggregate revenue from contracts with customers according to lines of business and payor classes. The transfer of goods and services may occur at a point in time or over time; in other words, revenue may be recognized over the course of the
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
underlying contract, or may occur at a single point in time based upon a single transfer of control. This distinction is discussed in further detail below. We determine that disaggregating revenue into these categories achieves the disclosure objective to depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table disaggregates our resident fees and services revenue by line of business, according to whether such revenue is recognized at a point in time or over time:
| | | | | | | | | | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | Point in Time | | Over Time | | Total | | Point in Time | | Over Time | | Total | | Point in Time | | Over Time | | Total |
| Integrated senior health campuses | | $ | 185,273,000 |
| | $ | 755,343,000 |
| | $ | 940,616,000 |
| | $ | 214,650,000 |
| | $ | 816,284,000 |
| | $ | 1,030,934,000 |
| | $ | 185,273,000 |
| | $ | 755,343,000 |
| | $ | 940,616,000 |
|
| Senior housing — RIDEA(1) | | 3,079,000 |
| | 61,996,000 |
| | 65,075,000 |
| | 2,944,000 |
| | 65,200,000 |
| | 68,144,000 |
| | 3,079,000 |
| | 61,996,000 |
| | 65,075,000 |
|
| Total resident fees and services | | $ | 188,352,000 |
| | $ | 817,339,000 |
| | $ | 1,005,691,000 |
| | $ | 217,594,000 |
| | $ | 881,484,000 |
| | $ | 1,099,078,000 |
| | $ | 188,352,000 |
| | $ | 817,339,000 |
| | $ | 1,005,691,000 |
|
The following table disaggregates our resident fees and services revenue by payor class:
| | | | | | | | | | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | Senior Housing — RIDEA(1) | | Total | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | Senior Housing — RIDEA(1) | | Total | | Integrated
Senior Health
Campuses(2) | | Senior
Housing
— RIDEA(1) | | Total |
| Medicare | | $ | 310,971,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 310,971,000 |
| | $ | 338,466,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 338,466,000 |
| | $ | 332,852,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 332,852,000 |
|
| Medicaid | | 170,664,000 |
| | 43,000 |
| | 170,707,000 |
| | 192,775,000 |
| | 214,000 |
| | 192,989,000 |
| | 170,664,000 |
| | 43,000 |
| | 170,707,000 |
|
| Private and other payors | | 458,981,000 |
| | 65,032,000 |
| | 524,013,000 |
| | 499,693,000 |
| | 67,930,000 |
| | 567,623,000 |
| | 437,100,000 |
| | 65,032,000 |
| | 502,132,000 |
|
| Total resident fees and services | | $ | 940,616,000 |
| | $ | 65,075,000 |
| | $ | 1,005,691,000 |
| | $ | 1,030,934,000 |
| | $ | 68,144,000 |
| | $ | 1,099,078,000 |
| | $ | 940,616,000 |
| | $ | 65,075,000 |
| | $ | 1,005,691,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | This includes fees for basic housing and assisted living care. We record revenue when services are rendered on the date services are provided at amounts billable to individual residents. Residency agreements are generally for a term of 30 days, with resident fees billed monthly in advance. For patients under reimbursement arrangements with Medicaid, revenue is recorded based on contractually agreed-upon amounts or rates on a per resident, daily basis or as services are rendered. |
| |
| (2) | For the year ended December 31, 2018, Medicare includes $21,881,000 of revenue that was previously disclosed as Private and other payors. There was no net change in previously disclosed total resident fees and services. |
Accounts Receivable, Net — Resident Fees and Services
The beginning and ending balances of accounts receivable, net — resident fees and services are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Medicare | | Medicaid | | Private and Other Payors | | Total |
Beginning balance — January 1, 2018 | | $ | 29,979,000 |
| | $ | 15,640,000 |
| | $ | 35,706,000 |
| | $ | 81,325,000 |
|
Ending balance — December 31, 2018 | | 29,160,000 |
| | 18,676,000 |
| | 39,112,000 |
| | 86,948,000 |
|
| (Decrease)/increase | | $ | (819,000 | ) | | $ | 3,036,000 |
| | $ | 3,406,000 |
| | $ | 5,623,000 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Medicare | | Medicaid | | Private and Other Payors | | Total |
Beginning balance — January 1, 2019 | | $ | 29,160,000 |
| | $ | 18,676,000 |
| | $ | 39,112,000 |
| | $ | 86,948,000 |
|
Ending balance — December 31, 2019 | | 32,127,000 |
| | 26,295,000 |
| | 46,614,000 |
| | 105,036,000 |
|
| Increase | | $ | 2,967,000 |
| | $ | 7,619,000 |
| | $ | 7,502,000 |
| | $ | 18,088,000 |
|
Deferred Revenue — Resident Fees and Services
The beginning and ending balances of deferred revenue — resident fees and services, all of which relates to private and other payors, are as follows:
|
| | | | |
| | | Total |
Beginning balance — January 1, 2018 | | $ | 9,801,000 |
|
Ending balance — December 31, 2018 | | 12,569,000 |
|
| Increase | | $ | 2,768,000 |
|
|
| | | | |
| | | Total |
Beginning balance — January 1, 2019 | | $ | 12,569,000 |
|
Ending balance — December 31, 2019 | | 13,518,000 |
|
| Increase | | $ | 949,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
All amounts included in the beginning balance of deferred revenue — resident fees and services at January 1, 20182019 were recognized as revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018.2019.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Financing Component
We have elected the practical expedient allowed under FASB ASC 606-10-32-18 and, therefore, we do not adjust the promised amount of consideration from patients and third-party payors for the effects of a significant financing component due to our expectation that the period between the time the service is provided to a patient and the time that the patient or a third-party payor pays for that service will be one year or less.
Contract Costs
We have applied the practical expedient provided by FASB ASC 340-40-25-4 and, therefore, all incremental customer contract acquisition costs are expensed as they are incurred since the amortization period of the asset that we otherwise would have recognized is one year or less in duration.
Tenant and Resident Receivables and Allowance for Uncollectible AccountsAllowances
Tenant and resident receivables and unbilled deferred rentResident receivables are carried net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts. An allowance is maintained for estimated losses resulting from the inability of certain tenants, residents and payors to meet the contractual obligations under their lease or service agreements. We also maintain an allowance for deferred rent receivables arising from the straight line recognitionUpon our adoption of rents. SuchASC Topic 606, substantially all of such allowances are chargedrecorded as direct reductions of resident fees and services revenue as contractual adjustments provided to bad debt expense, which is included in general and administrativethird-party payors or implicit price concessions in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive income (loss). Our determination of the adequacy of these allowances is based primarily upon evaluations of historical loss experience, the tenant’s or residents’ financial condition, security deposits, letters of credit, lease guarantees, cash collection patterns by payor and by state, current economic conditions and other relevant factors.
Prior to our adoption of ASC Topic 842, tenant receivables and unbilled deferred rent receivables were reduced for uncollectible amounts. Such amounts were charged to bad debt expense, which was included in general and administrative in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Effective upon our adoption of ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019, such amounts are recognized as direct reductions of real estate revenue in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we had $11,216,000$11,435,000 and $10,597,000,$11,216,000, respectively, in allowance for uncollectible accounts,allowances, which was determined necessary to reduce receivables to our estimate of the amount recoverablecollectible and includes price concessions. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we increased allowances by $13,087,000, $8,520,000 and 2016, $1,052,000,$7,298,000, respectively, and reduced allowances for collections or adjustments by $6,094,000, $1,437,000 and $54,000, and $0, respectively, of our receivables were directly written off to bad debt expense or as direct adjustments to revenue.respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, $6,774,000, $6,405,000 and 2016, $6,405,000, $6,074,000, and $5,609,000, respectively, of our receivables were written off against the allowance for uncollectible accounts.
As ofrelated allowances. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we did not have any allowance for uncollectible accounts for deferred rent receivables. For the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017$0, $59,000 and 2016, $59,000, $170,000, and $81,000, respectively, of our deferred rent receivables were directly written off to bad debt expense.
Property Acquisitions
In accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, or ASC Topic 805, and ASU 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business, or ASU 2017-01, we determine whether a transaction is a business combination, which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute a business. If the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are not a business, we account for the transaction as an asset acquisition. Under both methods, we recognize the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed; however, for a transaction accounted for as an asset acquisition, we allocate the purchase price to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. We immediately expense acquisition related expenses associated with a business combination and capitalize acquisition related expenses directly associated with an asset acquisition. As a result of our early adoption of ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2017, we accounted for the property acquisitions we completed for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 as asset acquisitions rather than business combinations. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, for a further discussion. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we completed 12 property acquisitions, which we accounted for as business combinations. Seeand Note 18, Business Combinations for a further discussion.
We, with assistance from independent valuation specialists, measure the fair value of tangible and identified intangible assets and liabilities, as applicable, based on their respective fair values for acquired properties. Our method for allocating the purchase price to acquired investments in real estate requires us to make subjective assessments for determining fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. This includes determining the value of the buildings, land, leasehold interests, furniture, fixtures and equipment, above- or below-market rent, in-place leases, master leases, above- or below-market debt assumed and derivative financial instruments assumed. These estimates require significant judgment and in some cases involve
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
complex calculations. These allocation assessments directly impact our results of operations, as amounts allocated to certain assets and liabilities have different depreciation or amortization lives. In addition, we amortize the value assigned to above- or
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
below-market rent as a component of revenue, unlike in-place leases and other intangibles, which we include in depreciation and amortization in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
The determination of the fair value of land is based upon comparable sales data. In cases where a leasehold interest in the land is acquired, only the above/below market consideration is necessary where the value of the leasehold interest is determined by discounting the difference between the contract ground lease payments and a market ground lease payment back to a present value as of the acquisition date. The fair value of buildings is based upon our determination of the value under two methods: one, as if it were to be replaced and vacant using cost data and, two, also using a residual technique based on discounted cash flow models, as vacant. Factors considered by us include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. We also recognize the fair value of furniture, fixtures and equipment on the premises, as well as the above- or below-market rent, the value of in-place leases, master leases, above- or below-market debt and derivative financial instruments assumed.
The value of the above- or below-market component of the acquired in-place leases is determined based upon the present value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference between: (i) the level payment equivalent of the contract rent paid pursuant to the lease; and (ii) our estimate of market rent payments taking into account rent steps throughout the lease. In the case of leases with options, a case-by-case analysis is performed based on all facts and circumstances of the specific lease to determine whether the option will be assumed to be exercised. The amounts related to above-market leases are included in identified intangible assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized against real estate revenue over the remaining non-cancelable lease term of the acquired leases with each property. The amounts related to below-market leases are included in identified intangible liabilities, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to real estate revenue over the remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any below-market renewal options of the acquired leases with each property.
The value of in-place lease costs are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of the tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with the tenants. Characteristics considered by us in allocating these values include the nature and extent of the credit quality and expectations of lease renewals, among other factors. The in-place lease intangible represents the value related to the economic benefit for acquiring a property with in-place leases as opposed to a vacant property, which is evaluated based on a review of comparable leases for a similar property, terms and conditions for marketing and executing new leases, and implied in the difference between the value of the whole property “as is” and “as vacant.” The net amounts related to in-place lease costs are included in identified intangible assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the average downtime of the acquired leases with each property. The net amounts related to the value of tenant relationships, if any, are included in identified intangible assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to depreciation and amortization expense over the average remaining non-cancelable lease term of the acquired leases plus the market renewal lease term. The value of a master lease, if any, in which a previous owner or a tenant is relieved of specific rental obligations as additional space is leased, is determined by discounting the expected real estate revenue associated with the master lease space over the assumed lease-up period.
The value of above- or below-market debt is determined based upon the present value of the difference between the cash flow stream of the assumed mortgage and the cash flow stream of a market rate mortgage at the time of assumption. The net value of above- or below-market debt is included in mortgage loans payable, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and is amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the assumed mortgage.
The value of derivative financial instruments, if any, is determined in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC Topic 820, and is included in other assets or other liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The values of contingent consideration assets and liabilities are analyzed at the time of acquisition. For contingent purchase options, the fair market value of the acquired asset is compared to the specified option price at the exercise date. If the option price is below market, it is assumed to be exercised and the difference between the fair market value and the option price is discounted to the present value at the time of acquisition.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Real Estate Investments, Net
We carry our operating properties at our historical cost less accumulated depreciation. The cost of operating properties includes the cost of land and completed buildings and related improvements, including those related to financing and capital lease obligations. Expenditures that increase the service life of properties are capitalized and the cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred. The cost of buildings and capital improvements is depreciated on a straight-line basis
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and capital improvements, up to 50 years, and the cost for tenant improvements is depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or useful life, up to 34 years. The cost of furniture, fixtures and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful life, up to 2728 years. When depreciable property is retired, replaced or disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in earnings.
As part of the leasing process, we may provide the lessee with an allowance for the construction of leasehold improvements. These leasehold improvements are capitalized and recorded as tenant improvements and depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the improvements or the lease term. If the allowance represents a payment for a purpose other than funding leasehold improvements, or in the event we are not considered the owner of the improvements, the allowance is considered to be a lease inducement and is included in other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Lease inducement is recognized over the lease term as a reduction of rentalreal estate revenue on a straight-line basis. Factors considered during this evaluation include, among other things, who holds legal title to the improvements as well as other controlling rights provided by the lease agreement and provisions for substantiation of such costs (e.g., unilateral control of the tenant space during the build-out process). Determination of the appropriate accounting for the payment of a tenant allowance is made on a lease-by-lease basis, considering the facts and circumstances of the individual tenant lease. Recognition of lease revenue commences when the lessee is given possession of the leased space upon completion of tenant improvements when we are the owner of the leasehold improvements. However, when the leasehold improvements are owned by the tenant, the lease inception date (and the date on which recognition of lease revenue commences) is the date the tenant obtains possession of the leased space for purposes of constructing its leasehold improvements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of investments in real estate that we carry at our historical cost less accumulated depreciation, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. Indicators we consider important and that we believe could trigger an impairment review include, among others, the following:
significant negative industry or economic trends;
a significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results; and
a significant change in the extent or manner in which the asset is used or significant physical change in the asset.
If indicators of impairment of our long-lived assets are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the related real estate investments in relation to the future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying operations. In performing this evaluation, we consider market conditions and our current intentions with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. We adjust the net book value of leased properties and other long-lived assets to fair value if the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows, including sales proceeds, is less than bookcarrying value. We recognize an impairment loss at the time we make any such determination.
We test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. We first assess qualitative factors, such as current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and our overall financial and operating performance, to determine the likelihood that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Until December 31, 2016, if we determined it was more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit was less than its carrying amount, we proceeded with the two-step approach to evaluating impairment. First, we estimated the fair value of the reporting unit and compared it to the reporting unit’s carrying value. If the carrying value exceeded the fair value, we proceeded with the second step, which required us to assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities was the implied value of goodwill and was used to determine the amount of impairment. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeded the implied value in the current period. On January 1, 2017, we early adopted ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, or ASU 2017-04, which eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test and allows an entity to perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting segment with its carrying amount. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied value in the current period.
If impairment indicators arise with respect to intangible assets with finite useful lives, we evaluate impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, then we estimate the fair value of the asset and compare the estimated fair value to the intangible asset’s carrying value. For all of our reporting units, we recognize any shortfall from carrying value as an impairment loss in the current period.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We test other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators arise. Similar to goodwill, weWe first assess qualitative factors to determine the likelihood that the fair value of the reporting group is less than its carrying value. If the carrying amount of an indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair values of other indefinite-lived intangible assets are usually determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, as appropriate.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we did not incur any impairment losses with respect to goodwill and intangible assets. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, for a further discussion of impairment of long-lived assets.
Properties Held for Sale
We account for our properties held for sale in accordance with ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, or ASC Topic 360, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC Topic 360 requires that a property or a group of properties is required to be reported in discontinued operations in the statements of operations and comprehensive lossincome (loss) for current and prior periods if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results when eithereither: (i) the component has been disposed of or (ii) is classified as held for sale.
In accordance with ASC Topic 360, at such time as a property is held for sale, such property is carried at the lower ofof: (i) its carrying amount or (ii) fair value less costs to sell. In addition, a property being held for sale ceases to be depreciated. We will classify operating properties as property held for sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met:
management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the asset;
the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets;
an active program to locate a buyer or buyers and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset has been initiated;
the sale of the asset is probable and the transfer of the asset is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year;
the asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and
given the actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset, it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan would be made or that the plan would be withdrawn.
Debt Security Investment and Real Estate Notes Receivable, Net
We classify our marketable debt security investment as held-to-maturity because we have the positive intent and Debt Security Investment, Netability to hold the security to maturity. Our held-to-maturity security is recorded at amortized cost and adjusted for the amortization of premiums or discounts through maturity. When we determine declines in fair value of marketable securities are other-than-temporary, a loss is recognized in earnings. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we did not incur any losses for a decline in fair value of marketable securities that are other-than-temporary.
Real estate notes receivable consists of mortgage loans collateralized by interests in real property. We record such mortgage loans at cost. Interest income on our real estate notes receivable is recognized on an accrual basis over the life of the investment using the effective interest method and is included in real estate revenue in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Direct loan costs are amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to the yield on the loan. We evaluate the collectability of both interest and principal for each of our loans to determine whether they are impaired. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the existing contractual terms. When a loan is considered to be impaired, the amount of the allowance is calculated by comparing the recorded investment to either the value determined by discounting the expected future cash flows using the loan’s effective interest rate or to the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we did not incur any impairment losses.
We classify our marketable debt security investment as held-to-maturity because we have the positive intent and ability to hold the security to maturity. Our held-to-maturity security is recorded at amortized cost and adjusted for the amortization of premiums or discounts through maturity. When we determine declines in fair value of marketable securities are other-than-temporary, a loss is recognized in earnings. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we did not incur any losses for a decline in fair value of marketable securities that are other-than-temporary.
See Note 4, Debt Security Investment and Real Estate Notes Receivable, and Debt Security Investment, Net, for a further discussion.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Derivative Financial Instruments
We are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes in the normal course of business. We seek to mitigate these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures, which include the occasional use of derivatives. Our primary strategy in entering into derivative contracts, such as fixed rate interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, is to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements by effectively converting a portion of our variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
Derivatives are recognized as either other assets or other liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are measured at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC Topic 815. ASC Topic 815 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. Since our derivative instruments are not designated as hedge instruments, they do not qualify for hedge accounting under ASC Topic 815. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are recorded as a component of interest expense in gain or loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
See Note 9, Derivative Financial Instruments, and Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, for a further discussion of our derivative financial instruments.
Fair Value Measurements
We follow ASC Topic 820 to account for the fair value of certain assets and liabilities. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
ASC Topic 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. An active market is defined as a market in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
See Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, for a further discussion.
Real Estate Deposits
Real estate deposits may include refundable and non-refundable funds held by escrow agents and others to be applied towards the acquisition of real estate investments, and such future investments are subject to substantial conditions to closing.
Other Assets, Net
Other assets, net consist of investments in unconsolidated entities, inventory, prepaid expenses and deposits, deferred financing costs related to our lines of credit and term loans, deferred rent receivables, deferred tax asset,assets, derivative financial instruments, lease inducementinducements and lease commissions.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We report investments in unconsolidated entities using the equity method of accounting when we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies. Under the equity method, our share of the investee’s earnings or losses is included in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). To the extent that our cost basis is different from the basis reflected at the entity level, the basis difference is generally amortized over the lives of the related assets and liabilities, and such amortization is included in our share of equity in earnings of the entity. The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities is based on the amount paid to purchase the entity interest or the estimated fair value of the assets prior to the sale of interests in the entity. We have elected to follow the cumulative earnings approach when classifying distributions received from equity method investments in our consolidated statements of cash flows, whereby any distributions received up to the amount of cumulative equity earnings will be considered a return on investment and classified in operating activities and any excess distributions would be considered a return of investment and classified in investing activities. We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment based upon a comparison of the estimated fair value of the equity method investment to its carrying value. When we determine a decline in the estimated fair value of such an investment below its carrying value is other-than-temporary, an impairment is recorded. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we did not incur any impairment losses from unconsolidated entities. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded $9,101,000 of impairment losses, which is included in loss from unconsolidated entities in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Inventory consists primarily of pharmaceutical and medical supplies and is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Deferred financing costs related to our lines of credit and term loans include amounts paid to lenders and others to obtain such financing. Such costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the related loan, which approximates the effective interest rate method. Amortization of deferred financing costs related to our lines of credit and term loans is included in interest expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Lease commissions are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the related lease. Amortization of lease commissions is included in depreciation and amortization in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).Prepaid expenses are amortized over the related contract periods.
See Note 6, Other Assets, Net, for a further discussion.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, accounts payable and accrued liabilities primarily includes insurance payablereserves of $35,581,000 and $32,123,000, respectively, accrued capital expenditures to unaffiliated third parties of $25,019,000 and $27,208,000,$12,490,000, respectively, reimbursement of payroll related costs to the managers of our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and integrated senior health campuses of $26,428,000$24,118,000 and $23,737,000,$26,428,000, respectively, accrued property taxes of $14,501,000 and $15,121,000, respectively, and $13,406,000, respectively, accrued distributions of $9,974,000 and $10,189,000, and $10,192,000, respectively, and accrued capital expenditures to unaffiliated third parties of $12,490,000 and $5,988,000, respectively.
Security Deposits, Prepaid Rent and Other Liabilities
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities of $37,418,000 and $39,461,000, respectively, primarily consisted of deferred revenue, deferred tax liabilities and contingent consideration obligations in connection with our property acquisitions.
The contingent consideration obligations are due upon certain criteria being met within specified time frames. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we recorded a net gain (loss) on the change in fair value of contingent consideration obligations of $2,843,000, $3,885,000 and $(13,430,000), respectively, which is included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). See Note 15, Fair Value Measurements — Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value — Contingent Consideration Liabilities, for a further discussion.
Stock Compensation
We account for stock compensation issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50, Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees. Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees is based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable: (i) the goods or services received; or (ii) the equity instruments issued. The fair value of the share-based payment transaction is determined at the earlier of the performance commitment date or performance completion date. See Note 13, Equity — Noncontrolling Interests, for a further discussion of grants to non-employees.
We follow ASC Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation, or ASC Topic 718, to account for our stock compensation pursuant to the 2013 Incentive Plan, or our incentive plan. See Note 13, Equity — 2013 Incentive Plan, for a further discussion of grants under our incentive plan.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Foreign Currency
We hadhave real estate and real estate-related investments in the United Kingdom, or UK, and Isle of Man for which the functional currency is the UK Pound Sterling, or GBP. We translate the results of operations of our foreign real estate and real estate-related investments into United States Dollars, or USD, using the average currency rates of exchange in effect during the period, and we translate assets and liabilities using the currency exchange rate in effect at the end of the period. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, a component of stockholders’ equity, in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Certain balance sheet items, primarily equity and capital-related accounts, are reflected at the historical currency exchange rates. We also have intercompany notes and payables denominated in GBP with our UK subsidiaries. Gains or losses resulting from remeasuring such intercompany notes and payables into USD at the end of each reporting period are reflected in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). When such intercompany notes and payables are deemed to be of a long-term investment nature, they will be reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are remeasured into USD at the rates of exchange prevailing on the date of the transactions. The effects of transaction gains or losses are generally included in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Income Taxes
We qualified, and elected to be taxed, as a REIT under the Code for federal income tax purposes beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014, and we intend to continue to qualify to be taxed as a REIT. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to currently distribute at least 90.0% of our annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders.
If we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT in any taxable year, we will then be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our net income and net cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We may be subject to certain state and local income taxes on our income, property or net worth in some jurisdictions, and in certain circumstances we may also be subject to federal excise taxes on undistributed income. In addition, certain activities that we undertake are conducted by subsidiaries, which we elected to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, to allow us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs. Also, we have real estate and real estate-related investments in the UK and Isle of Man, which do not accord REIT status to United States REITs under their tax laws. Accordingly, we recognize an income tax benefit (expense)or expense for the federal, state and local income taxes incurred by our TRSs and foreign income taxes on our real estate and real estate-related investments in the UK and Isle of Man.
We follow ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, or ASC Topic 740, to recognize, measure, present and disclose in our accompanying consolidated financial statements uncertain tax positions that we have taken or expect to take on a tax return. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we did not have any tax benefits nor liabilities for uncertain tax positions that we believe should be recognized in our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
We account for deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method and recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets reflect the impact of the future deductibility of operating loss carryforwards. A valuation allowance is provided if we believe it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset, is included in income tax benefit (expense)or expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) when such changes occur. Any increase or decrease in the deferred tax liability that results from a change in circumstances, and that causes us to change our judgment about expected future tax consequences of events, is recorded in income tax benefit (expense)or expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Deferred tax assets are included in other assets, net, and deferred tax liabilities are included in security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities, in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
See Note 16, Income Taxes, and Distributions, for a further discussion.
Segment Disclosure
ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about a public entity’s reportable segments. We segregate our operations into reporting segments in order to assess the performance of our business in the same way that management reviews our performance and makes operating decisions. Accordingly, when we acquired our first medical office building in June 2014; senior housing facility in September 2014; hospital in December 2014; senior housing — RIDEA portfoliofacility in May 2015; skilled nursing facilitiesfacility in October 2015; and integrated senior health campusescampus in December 2015, we established a new reportable business segment at such time. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we operated through six reportable business segments, —with activities related to investing in medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEA and integrated senior health campuses.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
See Note 19, Segment Reporting, for a further discussion.
GLA and Other Measures
GLA and other measures used to describe real estate investments included in our accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented on an unaudited basis.
Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, codified as ASC Topic 842—Leases, or ASC Topic 842, which amends the guidance on accounting for leases, including extensive amendments to the disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-02 maintains a distinction between finance and operating leases, which is substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the previous lease guidance. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees are required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease; and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under ASU 2016-02 from a lessor perspective, the guidance requires bifurcation of lease revenues into lease components and non-lease components and to separately recognize and disclose non-lease components that are executory in nature. Lease components continue to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and certain non-lease components may be accounted for under the new revenue recognition guidance in ASC Topic 606. In addition, ASU 2016-02 provides a practical expedient package that allows an entity to not reassess the following upon adoption (must be elected as a group): (i) whether an expired or existing contract contains a lease arrangement; (ii) the lease classification related to expired or existing lease arrangements; or (iii) whether costs incurred on expired or existing leases qualify as initial direct costs. We elected such practical expedient package upon our adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019.
In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases, or ASU 2018-10, and ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842) Targeted Improvements, or ASU 2018-11, which update the guidance on accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. ASU 2018-10 was issued to increase stockholders’ awareness of narrow aspects of the guidance issued in the amendments and to expedite the improvements under ASU 2016-02. ASU 2018-11 provides (i) an alternative transition method by allowing entities to initially apply the new leases standard at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption; and (ii) a practical expedient that permits lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component if certain conditions are met. Such practical expedient is limited to circumstances in which: (i) the timing and pattern of transfer are the same for the non-lease component and the related lease component; and (ii) the lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease. In addition, such practical expedient causes an entity to assess whether a contract is predominately lease or service based, and recognize the entire contract under the relevant accounting guidance. We elected both the alternative transition method and lessor practical expedient as described in ASU 2018-10 and ASU 2018-11 upon our adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Lessee Impact: As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019, we currently estimate the initial amount of the lease liability recorded on our consolidated balance sheet to be approximately $198,659,000 for all of our operating leases for which we are the lessee, including facilities leases and ground leases. In addition, we will record a corresponding right-of-use asset of $211,521,000, which is the lease liability, net of the existing accrued straight-line rent liability balance and adjusted for unamortized above/below market ground lease intangibles. The accounting for our existing capital (finance) leases upon adoption remains substantially unchanged.
Lessor Impact: We completed an assessment of predominance, and effective upon our adoption of ASU 2016-02, we recognize revenue for our medical office buildings, senior housing, skilled nursing facilities and hospitals segments under ASC Topic 842, and for our senior housing— RIDEA facilities and integrated senior health campuses, we recognize revenue under ASC Topic 606. In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-20, Narrow Scope Improvements for Lessors, or ASU 2018-20, which requires a lessor to: (i) exclude certain lessor costs (i.e., property taxes and insurance) paid directly by a lessee to third parties on behalf of the lessor from a lessor's measurement of variable lease revenue and associated expense (i.e., no gross up of revenue and expense for these costs); and (ii) include lessor costs that are paid by the lessor and reimbursed by the lessee in the measurement of variable lease revenue and the associated expense (i.e., gross up revenue and expense for these costs). For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we recognized property taxes paid by the lessee in revenue of $2,183,000, $2,137,000 and $1,675,000, respectively, with a corresponding amount in expense. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we did not recognize insurance paid by the lessee in revenue. Upon the adoption of ASC Topic 842, we will no longer record revenue or expense when the lessee pays the property taxes and insurance directly to a third party.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, or ASU 2016-13, which introduces a new approach to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments based on expected losses. It also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination. In addition,Subsequently, in November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses, or ASU 2018-19, which amended the scope of ASU 2016-13 to clarify that operating lease receivables should be accounted for under the new leasing standard ASC Topic 842. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments, or ASU 2019-04, to increase stakeholders’ awareness of the amendments and to expedite improvements to the ASC. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, Targeted Transition Relief, or ASU 2019-05, to address certain stakeholders’ concerns by providing an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option for certain financial assets previously measured at amortized cost basis. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842), or ASU 2019 10, which provides a framework to stagger effective dates for future major accounting standards and amends the effective dates for certain major new accounting standards to give implementation relief to certain types of entities. ASU 2016-13 isand its related amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted after December 15, 2018.was permitted. We are evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13adopted such accounting pronouncements on January 1, 2020, to our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, or ASU 2018-02, which amends the reclassification requirements from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Tax Act. Under ASU 2018-02, an entity will be required to provide certain disclosures regarding stranded tax effects. ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted ASU 2018-02 on January 1, 2019, which did not have a material impact onto our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, Amendments to the SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, or ASU 2018-05, which updates the income tax accounting in GAAP to reflect the interpretive guidance of the United States Securitiesstatements and Exchange Commission, or SEC, with regards to the Tax Act. We adopted ASU 2018-05 in March 2018, which did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 16, Income Taxes and Distributions, for a further discussion.disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework —Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, or ASU 2018-13, which modifies the disclosure requirements in ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurement, by removing certain disclosure requirements related to the fair value hierarchy, modifying existing disclosure requirements related to measurement uncertainty and adding new disclosure requirements, such as disclosing the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and disclosing the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption iswas permitted for any removed or modified disclosures. We are evaluating the complete impact of the adoption ofadopted ASU 2018-13 on January 1, 2020, which did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statementsstatement disclosures.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
3. Real Estate Investments, Net
Our real estate investments, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018: | | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Building, improvements and construction in process | $ | 2,160,944,000 |
| | $ | 2,058,312,000 |
| $ | 2,262,320,000 |
| | $ | 2,160,944,000 |
|
| Land and improvements | 189,446,000 |
| | 177,999,000 |
| 195,491,000 |
| | 189,446,000 |
|
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 126,985,000 |
| | 99,897,000 |
| 150,508,000 |
| | 126,985,000 |
|
| | 2,477,375,000 |
| | 2,336,208,000 |
| 2,608,319,000 |
| | 2,477,375,000 |
|
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (254,694,000 | ) | | (172,950,000 | ) | (337,898,000 | ) | | (254,694,000 | ) |
| | $ | 2,222,681,000 |
| | $ | 2,163,258,000 |
| $ | 2,270,421,000 |
| | $ | 2,222,681,000 |
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $90,914,000, $83,309,000 and 2016 was $83,309,000, $81,743,000, and $68,708,000, respectively. No impairment charges were recognized for the year ended December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we determined that one of our medical office buildings was impaired and recognized an impairment charge of $2,542,000, which reduced the total carrying value of such investment to $7,387,000. The fair value of such medical office building was based upon a discounted cash flow analysesanalysis where the most significant inputs were considered Level 3
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
measurements within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 15, Fair Value Measurements — Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value — Real Estate Investment, for a further discussion.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we determined that four integrated senior health campuses and one medical office building were impaired and recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $14,070,000, which reduced the total aggregate carrying value of such investments to $14,653,000. In July 2017, we disposed of one of those impaired integrated senior health campuses. The aggregate fair value of our remaining impaired integrated senior health campuses was based on their projected sales prices, which we considered as Level 2 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the impaired medical office building was based upon discounted cash flow analyses where the most significant inputs were considered Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 15, Fair Value Measurements — Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value — Real Estate Investment, for a further discussion. No impairment charges were recognized for the year ended December 31, 2016.
In addition to the acquisitions and completed developments and/or expansions discussed below, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we incurred capital expenditures of $93,485,000, $76,330,000 and $33,766,000, and $44,907,000, respectively, onfor our integrated senior health campuses, $16,571,000, $8,426,000 and $11,117,000, and $8,236,000, respectively, onfor our medical office buildings, $2,015,000, $1,711,000 and $855,000, and $904,000, respectively, onfor our senior housing — RIDEA facilities, $1,954,000, $463,000 and $569,000, and $0, respectively, onfor our skilled nursing facilities and $53,000, $131,000 and $92,000, and $21,000, respectively, onfor our hospitals. We did not incur any capital expenditures onfor our senior housing facilities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Included in capital expenditure amounts above are completed developments and expansions of integrated senior health campuses. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we completed the development of two integrated senior health campuses for $25,709,000. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we incurred $8,309,000 to expand our existing integrated senior health campuses. For the year ended December 31, 2017, and 2016.we completed integrated senior health campus developments for a total cost of approximately $6,834,000.
Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments
2019 Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2019, using cash on hand and debt financing, we completed the acquisition of two buildings from unaffiliated third parties. The following is a summary of our property acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition | | Location | | Type | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Line of Credit | | Acquisition Fee |
| North Carolina ALF Portfolio(1) | | Garner, NC | | Senior Housing
— RIDEA | | 03/27/19 | | $ | 15,000,000 |
| | $ | 15,000,000 |
| | $ | 338,000 |
|
| The Cloister at Silvercrest(2) | | New Albany, IN | | Integrated Senior Health Campus | | 10/01/19 | | 750,000 |
| | — |
| | 11,000 |
|
| Total | | | | | | | | $ | 15,750,000 |
| | $ | 15,000,000 |
| | $ | 349,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | We own 100% of our property acquired in 2019, which we added to our existing North Carolina ALF Portfolio. The other six buildings in North Carolina ALF Portfolio were acquired between January 2015 and August 2018. We borrowed under the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit, as defined in Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, at the time of acquisition. Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our property, an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the contract purchase price of such property. |
| |
| (2) | We, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy Investors, LLC, or Trilogy, of which we owned 67.7% at the time of acquisition, acquired such property using cash on hand. Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our property, an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price of the property attributed to our ownership interest in the Trilogy subsidiary that acquired the property. |
In addition to the property acquisitions discussed above, for the year ended December 31, 2019, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired land in Michigan and Ohio for an aggregate contract purchase price of $4,806,000 plus closing costs and paid to our advisor an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price of each land parcel attributed to our ownership interest at the time of acquisition.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2019 Acquisition of Previously Leased Real Estate Investment
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, of which we owned 67.7% at the time of acquisition, acquired one previously leased real estate investment located in Indiana. The following is a summary of such acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is included in our integrated senior health campuses segment:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Line of Credit(1) | | Acquisition Fee(2) |
| Corydon, IN | | 09/05/19 | | $ | 14,082,000 |
| | $ | 14,114,000 |
| | $ | 215,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | Represents a borrowing under the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, as defined in Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, at the time of acquisition. |
| |
| (2) | Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our property, an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price of the property attributed to our ownership interest at the time of acquisition in the Trilogy subsidiary that acquired the property. |
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we accounted for our property acquisitions, including our acquisition of previously leased real estate investments, as asset acquisitions. We incurred and capitalized closing costs and direct acquisition related expenses of $836,000 for such property acquisitions. The following table summarizes the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the time of acquisition from our property acquisitions in 2019 based on their relative fair values:
|
| | | | |
| | | 2019 Acquisitions |
| Building and improvements | | $ | 23,834,000 |
|
| Land | | 8,496,000 |
|
| In-place leases | | 3,596,000 |
|
| Total assets acquired | | $ | 35,926,000 |
|
2018 Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2018, using cash on hand and debt financing, we completed the acquisition of one building from an unaffiliated third party, which was added to our existing North Carolina ALF Portfolio. The other five buildings in North Carolina ALF Portfolio were acquired in January 2015, June 2015 and January 2017. On December 1, 2019, we transitioned the operations of North Carolina ALF Portfolio to a RIDEA structure. The following is a summary of our property acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2018:
| | | Acquisition(1) | | Location | | Type | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Lines of Credit and Term Loans(2) | | Acquisition Fee(3) | | Location | | Type | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Line of Credit(2) | | Acquisition Fee(3) |
| North Carolina ALF Portfolio | | Matthews, NC | | Senior Housing | | 08/30/18 | | $ | 15,000,000 |
| | $ | 13,500,000 |
| | $ | 338,000 |
| | Matthews, NC | | Senior Housing
— RIDEA | | 08/30/18 | | $ | 15,000,000 |
| | $ | 13,500,000 |
| | $ | 338,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | We own 100% of our property acquired in 2018. |
| |
| (2) | Represents a borrowing under the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit, as defined in Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, at the time of acquisition. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| |
| (3) | Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our property, an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the contract purchase price of such property. |
In addition to the property acquisition discussed above, on April 17, 2018, we purchased land as part of our existing Southern Illinois MOB Portfolio for a contract purchase price of $300,000, plus closing costs and paid a 2.25% acquisition fee to our advisor of approximately $7,000. On October 23, 2018 and November 26, 2018, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, Investors, LLC, or Trilogy, of which we ownowned 67.7%, at the time of acquisition, acquired land in Ohio and Michigan for an
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
aggregate contract purchase price of $3,146,000, plus closing costs and paid aggregate acquisition fees of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price of the land attributed to our ownership interest to our advisor of approximately $47,000.
2018 Acquisition of Previously Leased Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2018, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired a portfolio of four previously leased real estate investments located in Kentucky, Michigan and Ohio. The following is a summary of such acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2018, which is included in our integrated senior health campuses segment:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Locations | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Mortgage Loan Payable(1) | | Acquisition Fee(2) |
| Lexington, KY; Novi and Romeo, MI; and Fremont, OH | | 07/20/18 | | $ | 47,455,000 |
| | $ | 47,500,000 |
| | $ | 723,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | Represents the principal balance of the mortgage loan payable placed on the properties at the time of acquisition. |
| |
| (2) | Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price of the properties attributed to our ownership interest at the time of acquisition of approximately 67.7% in the Trilogy subsidiary that acquired the properties. |
For the year ended December 31, 2018, we accounted for our property acquisitions, including our acquisition of previously leased real estate investments, as asset acquisitions. We incurred and capitalized closing costs and direct acquisition related expenses of $3,044,000 for such property acquisitions, which were capitalized in accordance with ASU 2017-01.acquisitions. The following table summarizes the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the time of acquisition from our property acquisitions in 2018 based on their relative fair values:
| | | | | 2018 Property Acquisitions | | 2018 Acquisitions |
| Building and improvements | | $ | 49,757,000 |
| | $ | 49,757,000 |
|
| Land | | 10,980,000 |
| | 10,980,000 |
|
| In-place leases | | 6,894,000 |
| | 6,894,000 |
|
| Certificates of need | | 1,313,000 |
| | 1,313,000 |
|
| Total assets acquired | | $ | 68,944,000 |
| | $ | 68,944,000 |
|
2017 Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2017, using cash on hand and debt financing, we completed the acquisition of three buildings from unaffiliated third parties. The following is a summary of our property acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2017: | | | Acquisition(1) | | Location | | Type | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Lines of Credit and Term Loans(2) | | Acquisition Fee(3) | | Location | | Type | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Line of Credit(2) | | Acquisition Fee(3) |
| North Carolina ALF Portfolio(4) | | Huntersville, NC | | Senior Housing | | 01/18/17 | | $ | 15,000,000 |
| | $ | 14,000,000 |
| | $ | 338,000 |
| | Huntersville, NC | | Senior Housing
— RIDEA | | 01/18/17 | | $ | 15,000,000 |
| | $ | 14,000,000 |
| | $ | 338,000 |
|
| New London CT MOB | | New London, CT | | Medical Office | | 05/03/17 | | 4,850,000 |
| | 4,000,000 |
| | 109,000 |
| | New London, CT | | Medical Office | | 05/03/17 | | 4,850,000 |
| | 4,000,000 |
| | 109,000 |
|
| Middletown OH MOB II | | Middletown, OH | | Medical Office | | 12/20/17 | | 4,600,000 |
| | 5,000,000 |
| | 104,000 |
| | Middletown, OH | | Medical Office | | 12/20/17 | | 4,600,000 |
| | 5,000,000 |
| | 104,000 |
|
| Total | | $ | 24,450,000 |
| | $ | 23,000,000 |
| | $ | 551,000 |
| | $ | 24,450,000 |
| | $ | 23,000,000 |
| | $ | 551,000 |
|
___________
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| |
| (1) | We own 100% of our properties acquired in 2017. |
| |
| (2) | Represents borrowings under the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit, as defined in Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, at the time of acquisition. |
| |
| (3) | Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the contract purchase price of each property. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| |
| (4) | On January 18, 2017, we added one building to our existing North Carolina ALF Portfolio. The other four buildings in North Carolina ALF Portfolio were acquired in January 2015 and June 2015. On December 1, 2019, we transitioned the operations of North Carolina ALF Portfolio to a RIDEA structure. |
In addition to the property acquisitions in 2017 discussed above, on December 19, 2017, we purchased vacant land as part of Southern Illinois MOB Portfolio for a total price of $140,000, plus closing costs and paid a 2.25% acquisition fee to our advisor of $3,000. Also, infor the year ended December 2015,31, 2017, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, of which we ownowned 67.7%, at the time of acquisition, acquired six land parcels for an aggregate contract purchase price of $3,461,000, plus closing costs and paid aggregate acquisition fees of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price of the land attributed to our ownership interest to our advisor of approximately $53,000.
2017 Acquisitions of Previously Leased Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired eight previously leased real estate investments located in Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. The following is a summary of such acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2017, which are included in our integrated senior health campuses segment: | | | Location | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Lines of Credit and Term Loans(1) | | Acquisition Fee(2) | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Line of Credit(1) | | Acquisition Fee(2) |
| Boonville, Columbus and Hanover, IN; Lexington, KY; and Maumee and Willard, OH | | 02/01/17 | | $ | 72,200,000 |
| | $ | 53,700,000 |
| | $ | 1,099,000 |
| | 02/01/17 | | $ | 72,200,000 |
| | $ | 53,700,000 |
| | $ | 1,099,000 |
|
| Greenfield, IN | | 05/16/17 | | 3,500,000 |
| | — |
| | 53,000 |
| | 05/16/17 | | 3,500,000 |
| | — |
| | 53,000 |
|
| Ottawa, OH | | 12/15/17 | | 9,833,000 |
| | 10,000,000 |
| | 150,000 |
| | 12/15/17 | | 9,833,000 |
| | 10,000,000 |
| | 150,000 |
|
| Total | | $ | 85,533,000 |
| | $ | 63,700,000 |
| | $ | 1,302,000 |
| | $ | 85,533,000 |
| | $ | 63,700,000 |
| | $ | 1,302,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | Represents borrowings under the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit, as defined in Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, at the time of acquisition. |
| |
| (2) | Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price of the properties attributed to our ownership interest at the time of approximately 67.7%acquisition in the subsidiary of Trilogy that acquired the properties. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we accounted for our property acquisitions, including our acquisitions of previously leased real estate investments, as asset acquisitions. We incurred and capitalized closing costs and direct acquisition related expenses of $3,050,000, which were capitalized in accordance with ASU 2017-01.$3,055,000 for such property acquisitions. The following table summarizes the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the time of acquisition from our property acquisitions in 2017 based on their relative fair values: | | | | | 2017 Property Acquisitions | | 2017 Acquisitions |
| Building and improvements | | $ | 70,607,000 |
| | $ | 70,607,000 |
|
| Land | | 11,463,000 |
| | 11,463,000 |
|
| In-place leases | | 13,167,000 |
| | 13,167,000 |
|
| Certificates of need | | 5,608,000 |
| | 5,608,000 |
|
| Above-market leases | | 187,000 |
| | 187,000 |
|
| Total assets acquired | | 101,032,000 |
| | 101,032,000 |
|
| Below-market leases | | (11,000 | ) | | (11,000 | ) |
| Total liabilities assumed | | (11,000 | ) | | (11,000 | ) |
| Net assets acquired | | $ | 101,021,000 |
| | $ | 101,021,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2016 Acquisitions of Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2016, we completed 12 property acquisitions comprising 23 buildings from unaffiliated parties. The following is a summary of these property acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition(1) | | Location | | Type | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Mortgage Loans Payable(2) | | Lines of Credit and Term Loans(3) | | Acquisition Fee(4) |
| Naperville MOB | | Naperville, IL | | Medical Office | | 01/12/16 | | $ | 17,385,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 18,000,000 |
| | $ | 391,000 |
|
| Lakeview IN Medical Plaza(5) | | Indianapolis, IN | | Medical Office | | 01/21/16 | | 20,000,000 |
| | 15,000,000 |
| | 3,500,000 |
| | 387,000 |
|
| Pennsylvania Senior Housing Portfolio II | | Palmyra, PA | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | 02/01/16 | | 27,500,000 |
| | — |
| | 27,200,000 |
| | 619,000 |
|
| Snellville GA MOB | | Snellville, GA | | Medical Office | | 02/05/16 | | 8,300,000 |
| | — |
| | 8,300,000 |
| | 187,000 |
|
| Lakebrook Medical Center | | Westbrook, CT | | Medical Office | | 02/19/16 | | 6,150,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 138,000 |
|
| Stockbridge GA MOB III | | Stockbridge, GA | | Medical Office | | 03/29/16 | | 10,300,000 |
| | — |
| | 9,750,000 |
| | 232,000 |
|
| Joplin MO MOB | | Joplin, MO | | Medical Office | | 05/10/16 | | 11,600,000 |
| | — |
| | 12,000,000 |
| | 261,000 |
|
| Austell GA MOB | | Austell, GA | | Medical Office | | 05/25/16 | | 12,600,000 |
| | — |
| | 12,000,000 |
| | 284,000 |
|
| Middletown OH MOB | | Middletown, OH | | Medical Office | | 06/16/16 | | 19,300,000 |
| | — |
| | 17,000,000 |
| | 434,000 |
|
| Fox Grape SNF Portfolio | | Braintree, Brighton, Duxbury, Hingham, Quincy and Weymouth, MA | | Skilled Nursing | | 07/01/16
and
11/01/16 | | 88,000,000 |
| | 16,133,000 |
| | 71,000,000 |
| | 1,980,000 |
|
| Voorhees NJ MOB | | Voorhees, NJ | | Medical Office | | 07/08/16 | | 11,300,000 |
| | — |
| | 11,000,000 |
| | 254,000 |
|
| Crown Senior Care Portfolio(6) | | Aberdeen and Felixstowe, UK | | Senior Housing | | 11/15/16 | | 23,531,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46,000 |
|
| Norwich CT MOB Portfolio | | Norwich, CT | | Medical Office | | 12/16/16 | | 15,600,000 |
| | — |
| | 14,000,000 |
| | 351,000 |
|
| Total | | | | | | | | $ | 271,566,000 |
| | $ | 31,133,000 |
| | $ | 203,750,000 |
| | $ | 5,564,000 |
|
___________
| |
(1) | We own 100% of our properties acquired in 2016, with the exception of Lakeview IN Medical Plaza. |
| |
(2) | Represents the principal balance of the mortgage loans payable assumed by us or newly placed on the property at the time of acquisition. |
| |
(3) | Represents borrowings under the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit, as defined in Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, at the time of acquisition. |
| |
(4) | Unless otherwise noted, our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the contract purchase price of the property. |
| |
(5) | On January 21, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Lakeview IN Medical Plaza, pursuant to a joint venture with an affiliate of Cornerstone Companies, Inc., an unaffiliated third party. Our effective ownership of the joint venture is 86.0%. We paid our advisor an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price attributed to our ownership interest of approximately 86.0% in the entity that acquired the property. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| |
(6) | On November 15, 2016, we added three additional senior housing facilities to our existing Crown Senior Care Portfolio for a net contract price of £15,276,000. The other three senior housing facilities were purchased during 2015. With respect to the three additional senior housing facilities acquired in November 2016, we paid an acquisition fee equal to 2.25% of the contract purchase price of the facilities less £306,000, or approximately $471,000, which was previously paid as an acquisition fee for Crown Senior Care Facility. See Note 19, Segment Reporting, for a further discussion. The total acquisition fee paid for both Crown Senior Care Facility and the purchase of the three additional senior housing facilities added to Crown Senior Care Portfolio in November 2016 was 2.25% of the contract purchase price of the three additional senior housing facilities added in November 2016. |
In addition to the property acquisitions in 2016 discussed above, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired a development parcel with improvements on July 15, 2016 in Harrodsburg, Kentucky, and on September 14, 2016, we acquired land in Muncie, Indiana for a contract purchase price of $2,400,000 and $265,000, respectively, plus closing costs and acquisition fees, which are included in our integrated senior health campuses segment. The acquisition of the development parcel with improvements in Kentucky was financed with a mortgage loan payable, which had a principal balance of $2,040,000 at the time of acquisition.
2016 Acquisitions of Previously Leased Real Estate Investments
For the year ended December 31, 2016, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired the real estate underlying 17 previously leased integrated senior health campuses located in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Ohio. The following is a summary of these property acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Date Acquired | | Contract Purchase Price | | Mortgage Loans Payable(1) | | Lines of Credit and Term Loans(2) | | Acquisition Fee(3) |
| Jasper, IN | | 06/24/16 | | $ | 5,089,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 78,000 |
|
| Anderson, Evansville, Jasper, Kokomo, New Albany and Tell City, IN; and Cynthiana, KY | | 06/30/16 | | 130,000,000 |
| | 93,150,000 |
| | 30,310,000 |
| | 1,980,000 |
|
| Greensburg, IN; Lexington, KY; East Lansing, Howell, Okemos and Shelby Township, MI; and Greenville and Zanesville, OH | | 08/16/16 | | 87,927,000 |
| | 77,900,000 |
| | 11,863,000 |
| | 1,339,000 |
|
| Monticello, IN | | 09/23/16 | | 4,074,000 |
| | 2,800,000 |
| | — |
| | 62,000 |
|
| | | | | $ | 227,090,000 |
| | $ | 173,850,000 |
| | $ | 42,173,000 |
| | $ | 3,459,000 |
|
___________
| |
(1) | Represents the principal balance of the mortgage loans payable placed on the properties at the time of acquisition. |
| |
(2) | Represents borrowings under the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit, as defined in Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans, at the time of acquisition. |
| |
(3) | Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services rendered in connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our properties, an acquisition fee of 2.25% of the portion of the contract purchase price of the properties attributed to our ownership interest of approximately 67.7% in the subsidiary of Trilogy that acquired the property. |
Completed Developments and/or Expansions
For the year ended December 31, 2018, we incurred $8,309,000 to expand our existing integrated senior health campuses. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we completed integrated senior health campus developments for a total cost of approximately $6,834,000 and $25,381,000, respectively. Completed development and/or expansions are included in real estate investments, net, in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Dispositions of Real Estate Investments
For the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2016,2018, we did not dispose of any real estate investments. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we disposed of one land parcel in Kentucky one integrated senior health campus in Indiana and one integrated senior health campus in each of Indiana and Ohio. We recognized a total net gain on such dispositions of $3,370,000. Our advisor agreed to waive the disposition fees and expense reimbursements related to such dispositions that may otherwise have been due to our advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement. Our advisor did not receive any additional securities, shares of our stock or any other form of consideration or any repayment as a result of the waiver of such disposition fees and expense reimbursements.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following is a summary of our dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2017, which were included in our integrated senior health campuses segment: |
| | | | | | |
| Location | | Date Disposed | | Contract Sales Price |
| Harrodsburg, KY | | 01/13/17 | | $ | 2,400,000 |
|
| Merrillville, IN | | 05/01/17 | | 17,000,000 |
|
| Fremont, OH | | 07/20/17 | | 400,000 |
|
| Total | | | | $ | 19,800,000 |
|
4. Debt Security Investment and Real Estate Notes Receivable, and Debt Security Investment, Net
The following is a summary of our notes receivable and debt security investment and notes receivable, including unamortized loan and closing costs, net as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
| | | | | | | December 31, | | | | December 31, |
| | | Origination Date | | Maturity Date | | Contractual Interest Rate(1) | | Maximum Advances Available | | 2018 | | 2017 | | Acquisition Fee(2) | | Origination Date | | Original Maturity Date | | Contractual Interest Rate(1) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Debt security investment(2) | | | 10/15/15 | | 08/25/25 | | 4.24% | | $ | 71,342,000 |
| | $ | 68,355,000 |
|
| Mezzanine Fixed Rate Notes(3) | | 02/04/15 | | 12/09/19 | | 6.75% | | $ | 28,650,000 |
| | $ | 28,650,000 |
| | $ | 28,650,000 |
| | $ | 573,000 |
| | 02/04/15 | | 12/09/19 | | N/A | | — |
| | 28,650,000 |
|
| Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes(3) | | 02/04/15 | | 12/09/18 | | N/A | | $ | 31,567,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,799,000 |
| | 631,000 |
| |
| Debt security investment(4) | | 10/15/15 | | 08/25/25 | | 4.24% | | N/A | | 68,355,000 |
| | 65,638,000 |
| | 1,209,000 |
| |
| | | | | 97,005,000 |
| | 96,087,000 |
| | $ | 2,413,000 |
| | 71,342,000 |
| | 97,005,000 |
|
| Unamortized loan and closing costs, net | | | | 1,650,000 |
| | 1,901,000 |
| | | | 1,375,000 |
| | 1,650,000 |
|
| | | | | $ | 98,655,000 |
| | $ | 97,988,000 |
| | | | $ | 72,717,000 |
| | $ | 98,655,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | Represents the per annum interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2018.2019. |
| |
| (2) | Our advisor was paid, as compensation for services in connection with real estate-related investments, an acquisition fee of 2.00% of the total amount advanced or invested through December 31, 2018. |
| |
(3) | On February 4, 2015, we acquired eight promissory notes at par value in the aggregate outstanding principal amount of $60,217,000, or the Mezzanine Notes, comprising four fixed-rate notes in the aggregate outstanding principal amount of $28,650,000, or the Mezzanine Fixed Rate Notes, and four floating rate notes in the aggregate outstanding principal amount of $31,567,000, or the Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes. The Mezzanine Notes evidence interests in a portion of a mezzanine loan that is secured by pledges of equity interests in the owners of a portfolio of domestic healthcare properties, which such owners are themselves owned indirectly by a non-wholly owned subsidiary of Colony Capital. In November 2018, the borrower repaid the Mezzanine Floating Rate Notes in full. Balance represents the original principal balance, decreased by subsequent principal paydowns. The Mezzanine Notes only require monthly interest payments and are subject to certain prepayment restrictions if repaid before the respective maturity dates.
|
| |
(4) | On October 15, 2015, we acquired a commercial mortgage-backed debt security, or the debt security, for a purchase price of $60,429,000, from an unaffiliated third party. The debt security bears an interest rate on the stated principal amount thereof equal to 4.24% per annum, the terms of which security provide for monthly interest-only payments. The debt security matures on August 25, 2025 at a stated amount of $93,433,000, resulting in an anticipated yield-to-maturity of 10.0% per annum. The debt security was issued by an unaffiliated mortgage trust and represents a 10.0% beneficial ownership interest in such mortgage trust. The debt security is subordinate to all other interests in the mortgage trust and is not guaranteed by a government-sponsored entity. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, the net carrying amount with accretion was $69,873,000$72,717,000 and $67,275,000,$69,873,000, respectively. We classify our debt security investment as held-to-maturity and we have not recorded any unrealized holding gains or losses on such investment. |
| |
| (3) | On February 4, 2015, we acquired four fixed-rate promissory notes at par value in the aggregate outstanding principal amount of $28,650,000, or the Mezzanine Fixed Rate Notes. The Mezzanine Fixed Rate Notes evidenced interests in a portion of a mezzanine loan that was secured by pledges of equity interests in the owners of a portfolio of domestic healthcare properties, which such owners are themselves owned indirectly by a non-wholly owned subsidiary of Colony Capital. In June 2019, the Mezzanine Fixed Rate Notes were paid in full by the borrowers. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table reflects the changes in the carrying amount of our debt security investment and real estate notes receivable and debt security investment, net for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
| | | | | Amount | Years Ended December 31, |
| Real estate notes receivable and debt security investment, net — December 31, 2016 | | $ | 101,117,000 |
| |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Beginning Balance | | $ | 98,655,000 |
| | $ | 97,988,000 |
|
| Additions: | | | | | |
| Accretion on debt security investment | | 2,462,000 |
| |
| Accretion on debt security | | 2,987,000 |
| | 2,717,000 |
|
| Deductions: | | | | | |
| Principal repayments on real estate notes receivable | | (5,368,000 | ) | (28,650,000 | ) | | (1,799,000 | ) |
| Amortization of loan and closing costs | | (223,000 | ) | (275,000 | ) | | (251,000 | ) |
| Real estate notes receivable and debt security investment, net — December 31, 2017 | | $ | 97,988,000 |
| |
| Additions: | | | |
| Accretion on debt security investment | | $ | 2,717,000 |
| |
| Deductions: | | | |
| Principal repayments on real estate notes receivable | | (1,799,000 | ) | |
| Amortization of loan and closing costs | | (251,000 | ) | |
| Real estate notes receivable and debt security investment, net — December 31, 2018 | | $ | 98,655,000 |
| |
| Ending Balance | | $ | 72,717,000 |
| | $ | 98,655,000 |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we did not record any impairment losses on our debt security investment or real estate notes receivable or debt security investment.receivable. Amortization expense on loan and closing costs for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, was recorded against real estate revenue in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
5. Identified Intangible Assets, Net
Identified intangible assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Amortized intangible assets: | | | |
| In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $23,497,000 and $25,967,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 9.8 years and 10.2 years as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively) | $ | 45,815,000 |
| | $ | 50,520,000 |
|
| Leasehold interests, net of accumulated amortization of $548,000 and $407,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 53.6 years and 54.6 years as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively) | 7,346,000 |
| | 7,487,000 |
|
| Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $187,000 and $37,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 18.8 years and 19.8 years as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively) | 2,653,000 |
| | 2,803,000 |
|
| Above-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $2,851,000 and $3,335,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 5.2 years as of both December 31, 2018 and 2017) | 2,059,000 |
| | 3,026,000 |
|
| Internally developed technology and software, net of accumulated amortization of $117,000 and $23,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 3.8 years and 4.8 years as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively) | 353,000 |
| | 447,000 |
|
| Unamortized intangible assets: | | | |
| Certificates of need | 88,590,000 |
| | 83,320,000 |
|
| Trade names | 30,787,000 |
| | 30,787,000 |
|
| Purchase option assets(1) | 1,918,000 |
| | 1,918,000 |
|
| | $ | 179,521,000 |
| | $ | 180,308,000 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Amortized intangible assets: | | | |
| In-place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $21,029,000 and $23,497,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 9.4 years and 9.8 years as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) | $ | 30,407,000 |
| | $ | 45,815,000 |
|
| Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $336,000 and $187,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 16.8 years and 18.8 years as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) | 2,504,000 |
| | 2,653,000 |
|
| Above-market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $2,057,000 and $2,851,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 5.0 years and 5.2 years as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) | 1,452,000 |
| | 2,059,000 |
|
| Internally developed technology and software, net of accumulated amortization of $211,000 and $117,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 2.8 years and 3.8 years as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) | 259,000 |
| | 353,000 |
|
| Leasehold interests, net of accumulated amortization of $548,000 as of December 31, 2018 (with a weighted average remaining life of 53.6 years as of December 31, 2018)(1) | — |
| | 7,346,000 |
|
| Unamortized intangible assets: | | | |
| Certificates of need | 94,838,000 |
| | 88,590,000 |
|
| Trade names | 30,787,000 |
| | 30,787,000 |
|
| Purchase option asset(2) | — |
| | 1,918,000 |
|
| | $ | 160,247,000 |
| | $ | 179,521,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | Upon our adoption of ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019, such amount was reclassed to operating lease right-of-use assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheet and related to our ownership of fee simple interests in the building and improvements of 16 of our buildings that are subject to respective ground leases. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Leases, and Note 17, Leases, for a further discussion. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| |
(1)(2) | Under one ofFor the year ended December 31, 2019, we exercised our integrated senior health campus leases, in which we are the lessee, we have the right to acquire thea property at a datethrough our unconsolidated investment in the future and at our option. We estimated the fairRHS Partners, LLC, or RHS. The value of thisthe purchase option asset by discounting the difference between the property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. We do not amortize the resulting intangible asset over the term of the lease, but rather adjust the recognized value of the asset upon purchase.utilized was $1,918,000. See Note 6, Other Assets, Net for a further discussion. |
Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $19,973,000, $12,736,000 and 2016 was $12,736,000, $32,541,000, and $203,147,000, respectively, which included $607,000, $967,000 $1,368,000 and $1,580,000,$1,368,000, respectively, of amortization recorded against real estate revenue for above-market leases and $0, $141,000 $140,000 and $140,000, respectively, of amortization recorded to rental expenses for leasehold interests in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
The aggregate weighted average remaining life of the identified intangible assets was 9.7 years and 15.5 years as of both December 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017.respectively. As of December 31, 2018,2019, estimated amortization expense on the identified intangible assets for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter was as follows:
| | | Year | | Amount | | Amount |
| 2019 | | $ | 10,204,000 |
| |
| 2020 | | 6,134,000 |
| | $ | 6,450,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 5,561,000 |
| | 4,715,000 |
|
| 2022 | | 4,841,000 |
| | 4,002,000 |
|
| 2023 | | 4,038,000 |
| | 3,235,000 |
|
| 2024 | | | 2,819,000 |
|
| Thereafter | | 27,448,000 |
| | 13,401,000 |
|
| | | $ | 58,226,000 |
| | $ | 34,622,000 |
|
6. Other Assets, Net
Other assets, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Deferred rent receivables | | $ | 33,205,000 |
| | $ | 23,334,000 |
|
| Prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets | $ | 29,803,000 |
| | $ | 21,796,000 |
| 26,816,000 |
| | 29,803,000 |
|
| Inventory | | 23,872,000 |
| | 21,151,000 |
|
| Investments in unconsolidated entities | 15,432,000 |
| | 17,259,000 |
| 20,176,000 |
| | 15,432,000 |
|
| Inventory | 21,151,000 |
| | 19,311,000 |
| |
| Deferred rent receivables | 23,334,000 |
| | 17,458,000 |
| |
| Deferred tax assets, net(1) | 9,461,000 |
| | 6,882,000 |
| 13,315,000 |
| | 9,461,000 |
|
| Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $12,487,000 and $7,850,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively(2) | 2,311,000 |
| | 6,327,000 |
| |
| Lease commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $1,274,000 and $606,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively | 8,523,000 |
| | 5,426,000 |
| |
| Lease inducement, net of accumulated amortization of $789,000 and $439,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 12.0 years and 13.0 years as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively) | 4,211,000 |
| | 4,561,000 |
| |
| Lease commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $2,201,000 and $1,274,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | | 10,794,000 |
| | 8,523,000 |
|
| Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2,138,000 and $12,487,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively(2) | | 8,137,000 |
| | 2,311,000 |
|
| Lease inducement, net of accumulated amortization of $1,140,000 and $789,000 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of 10.9 years and 12.0 years as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively) | | 3,860,000 |
| | 4,211,000 |
|
| | $ | 114,226,000 |
| | $ | 99,020,000 |
| $ | 140,175,000 |
| | $ | 114,226,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | See Note 16, Income Taxes, and Distributions, for a further discussion. |
| |
| (2) | In accordance with ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs and ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, deferredDeferred financing costs net only include costs related to our lines of credit and term loans.
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Amortization expense on lease commissions for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $741,000, $450,000 and $162,000, respectively. Amortization expense on deferred financing costs of our lines of credit and term loans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $3,664,000, $4,637,000 and 2016 was $4,637,000, $4,331,000, and $3,456,000, respectively, which is recorded to interest expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).respectively. Amortization expense on lease inducementcommissions for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $1,132,000, $741,000 and 2016$450,000, respectively. Amortization expense on lease inducements for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $351,000, $350,000 and $351,000, and $88,000, respectively, which is recorded against real estate revenue in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).respectively.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Investments in unconsolidated entities primarily represents our investment in RHS, Partners, LLC, or RHS, a privately-held company that operates 16 integrated senior health campuses, of which RHS owns three integrated senior health campuses. Our effective ownership of RHS iswas 33.8% as of both December 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we had a receivable of $2,507,000$5,133,000 and $1,351,000,$2,507,000, respectively, due from RHS, which is included in accounts and other receivables, net, in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The following is summarized financial information of our investments in unconsolidated entities: | | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | RHS | | Other | | Total | | RHS | | Other | | Total | RHS | | Other | | Total | | RHS | | Other | | Total |
| Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 48,291,000 |
| | $ | 100,000 |
| | $ | 48,391,000 |
| | $ | 48,176,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 48,176,000 |
| $ | 278,297,000 |
| | $ | 17,022,000 |
| | $ | 295,319,000 |
| | $ | 48,291,000 |
| | $ | 100,000 |
| | $ | 48,391,000 |
|
| Total liabilities | $ | 25,263,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,263,000 |
| | $ | 21,395,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 21,395,000 |
| $ | 251,283,000 |
| | $ | 17,245,000 |
| | $ | 268,528,000 |
| | $ | 25,263,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,263,000 |
|
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | RHS | | Other | | Total | | RHS | | Other | | Total | | RHS | | Other | | Total | RHS | | Other | | Total | | RHS | | Other | | Total | | RHS | | Other | | Total |
| Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | $ | 130,543,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 130,543,000 |
| | $ | 128,038,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 128,038,000 |
| | $ | 119,122,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 119,122,000 |
| $ | 142,834,000 |
| | $ | 7,322,000 |
| | $ | 150,156,000 |
| | $ | 130,543,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 130,543,000 |
| | $ | 128,038,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 128,038,000 |
|
| Expenses | 138,296,000 |
| | — |
| | 138,296,000 |
| | 138,134,000 |
| | — |
| | 138,134,000 |
| | 137,686,000 |
| | — |
| | 137,686,000 |
| 145,575,000 |
| | 9,045,000 |
| | 154,620,000 |
| | 138,296,000 |
| | — |
| | 138,296,000 |
| | 138,134,000 |
| | — |
| | 138,134,000 |
|
| Net loss | $ | (7,753,000 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (7,753,000 | ) | | $ | (10,096,000 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (10,096,000 | ) | | $ | (18,564,000 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (18,564,000 | ) | $ | (2,741,000 | ) | | $ | (1,723,000 | ) | | $ | (4,464,000 | ) | | $ | (7,753,000 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (7,753,000 | ) | | $ | (10,096,000 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (10,096,000 | ) |
7. Mortgage Loans Payable, Net
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, mortgage loans payable were $713,030,000$816,217,000 ($688,262,000, including792,870,000, net of discount/premium and deferred financing costs, net)costs) and $636,329,000$713,030,000 ($613,558,000, including688,262,000, net of discount/premium and deferred financing costs, net)costs), respectively. As of December 31, 2019, we had 58 fixed-rate mortgage loans payable and seven variable-rate mortgage loans payable with effective interest rates ranging from 2.45% to 6.21% per annum based on interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2019 and a weighted average effective interest rate of 3.85%. As of December 31, 2018, we had 57 fixed-rate mortgage loans payable and six variable-rate mortgage loans payable with effective interest rates ranging from 2.45% to 8.46% per annum based on interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2018 and a weighted average effective interest rate of 3.98%. As of December 31, 2017, we had 47 fixed-rate mortgage loans payable and four variable-rate mortgage loans payable with effective interest rates ranging from 2.45% to 7.57% per annum based on interest rates in effect as of December 31, 2017 and a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.02%. We are required by the terms of certain loan documents to meet certain covenants, such as net worth ratios, fixed charge coverage ratio,ratios, leverage ratioratios and reporting requirements.
On May 12, 2017,For the year ended December 31, 2019, we paid off a mortgage loan payable for the principal amount of $93,150,000 that was due to mature in June 2018. We incurred a totalan aggregate loss on such debtthe extinguishment of $1,432,000, primarily related to the write-offmortgage loans payable of unamortized deferred financing costs and prepayment penalties,$2,182,000, which is recorded to interest expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Such losses were primarily related to the write-off of unamortized debt discounts and prepayment penalties on two mortgage loans payable that were due to mature in November 2047 and April 2049. The sourcessource of funds for the pay-off and transaction costspayoffs were primarily from: (i) new U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development loans of approximately $72,019,000; and (ii) $21,600,000 in additional borrowings underfrom the 2019 Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit Facility, as defined in Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans.
Mortgage loans payable, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Total fixed-rate debt | $ | 714,786,000 |
| | $ | 624,616,000 |
|
| Total variable-rate debt | 101,431,000 |
| | 88,414,000 |
|
| Total fixed- and variable-rate debt | 816,217,000 |
| | 713,030,000 |
|
| Less: deferred financing costs, net | (9,362,000 | ) | | (8,824,000 | ) |
| Add: premium | 304,000 |
| | 663,000 |
|
| Less: discount | (14,289,000 | ) | | (16,607,000 | ) |
| Mortgage loans payable, net | $ | 792,870,000 |
| | $ | 688,262,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Mortgage loans payable, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Total fixed-rate debt | $ | 624,616,000 |
| | $ | 526,503,000 |
|
| Total variable-rate debt | 88,414,000 |
| | 109,826,000 |
|
| Total fixed and variable-rate debt | 713,030,000 |
| | 636,329,000 |
|
| Less: deferred financing costs, net | (8,824,000 | ) | | (6,290,000 | ) |
| Add: premium | 663,000 |
| | 1,176,000 |
|
| Less: discount | (16,607,000 | ) | | (17,657,000 | ) |
| Mortgage loans payable, net | $ | 688,262,000 |
| | $ | 613,558,000 |
|
The following table reflects the changes in the carrying amount of mortgage loans payable, net for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017:
| | | | | Amount | Years Ended December 31, |
| Mortgage loans payable, net — December 31, 2016 | | $ | 495,717,000 |
| |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Beginning Balance | | $ | 688,262,000 |
| | $ | 613,558,000 |
|
| Additions: | | | | | |
| Borrowings on mortgage loans payable | | 230,611,000 |
| 191,246,000 |
| | 181,594,000 |
|
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | | 2,387,000 |
| 1,544,000 |
| | 1,269,000 |
|
| Amortization of discount/premium on mortgage loans payable | | 998,000 |
| 647,000 |
| | 537,000 |
|
| Deductions: | | | | | |
| Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loans payable | | (8,524,000 | ) | (74,037,000 | ) | | (10,444,000 | ) |
| Pay-off of mortgage loan payable | | (102,815,000 | ) | |
| Payoff of mortgage loans payable | | (14,022,000 | ) | | (94,449,000 | ) |
| Deferred financing costs | | (4,816,000 | ) | (770,000 | ) | | (3,803,000 | ) |
| Mortgage loans payable, net — December 31, 2017 | | $ | 613,558,000 |
| |
| Additions: | | | |
| Borrowings on mortgage loans payable | | $ | 181,594,000 |
| |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | | 1,269,000 |
| |
| Amortization of discount/premium on mortgage loans payable | | 537,000 |
| |
| Deductions: | | | |
| Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loans payable | | (10,444,000 | ) | |
| Pay-off of mortgage loans payable | | (94,449,000 | ) | |
| Deferred financing costs | | (3,803,000 | ) | |
| Mortgage loans payable, net — December 31, 2018 | | $ | 688,262,000 |
| |
| Ending Balance | | $ | 792,870,000 |
| | $ | 688,262,000 |
|
As of December 31, 2018,2019, the principal payments due on our mortgage loans payable for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter were as follows:
| | | Year | | Amount | | Amount |
| 2019 | | $ | 17,402,000 |
| |
| 2020 | | 82,811,000 |
| | $ | 71,838,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 34,645,000 |
| | 55,419,000 |
|
| 2022 | | 61,083,000 |
| | 62,070,000 |
|
| 2023 | | 28,101,000 |
| | 35,822,000 |
|
| 2024 | | | 70,796,000 |
|
| Thereafter | | 488,988,000 |
| | 520,272,000 |
|
| | | $ | 713,030,000 |
| | $ | 816,217,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
8. Lines of Credit and Term Loans
2016 Corporate Line of Credit
On February 3, 2016, we, through certain of our subsidiaries, or the subsidiary guarantors, entered into a credit agreement, or the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, with Bank of America, N.A., or Bank of America, as administrative agent, a swing line lender and a letter of credit issuer; KeyBank, National Association, or KeyBank, as syndication agent, a swing line lender and a letter of credit issuer; and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, to obtain a revolving line of credit with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $300,000,000, or the 2016 Corporate Revolving Credit Facility, and a term loan credit facility in the amount of $200,000,000, or the 2016 Corporate Term Loan Facility, and together with the 2016 Corporate Revolving Credit Facility, the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit. Pursuant to the terms of the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, we could have borrowed up to $25,000,000 in the form of standby letters of credit and up to $25,000,000 in the form of swing line loans. The 2016 Corporate Line of Credit would have matured on February 3, 2019 and may have been extended beyond the maturity date for one 12-month period during the term of the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee. On February 3, 2016, we also entered into separate revolving notes, or the 2016 Corporate Revolving Notes, and separate term notes or the Term Notes, with each of Bank of America, KeyBank and a syndicate of other banks.
The maximum principal amount of the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit couldwould have been increased by up to $500,000,000, for a total principal amount of $1,000,000,000, subject to: (i) the terms of the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement; and (ii) such additional financing being offered and provided by existing lenders or new lenders under the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement. matured on February 3, 2019.
On August 3, 2017, we entered into a First Amendment, Waiver and Commitment Increase Agreement, or the Amendment, with Bank of America, KeyBank, and the lenders named therein, to amend the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement. The material terms of the Amendment provided for:included: (i) an increase in the 2016 Corporate Term Loan Facility in an amount equal to $50,000,000; (ii) the establishment of an additional capitalization rate of 8.75% for any Real Property Asset (as defined in the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement) with mixed uses consisting of both assisted living and independent living properties and skilled nursing facilities, but specifically excluding medical office buildings and life science buildings; (iii) a revision to the definition of Term Loan Commitment, (asas defined in the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement)Agreement, to reflect the increase in the 2016 Corporate Term Loan Facility and specify that the aggregate principal amount of the Term Loan Commitments of all of the Term Loan Lenders, (asas defined in the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement)Agreement, as in effect on the effective date of the Amendment is $250,000,000; (iv) an agreement by each Term Loan Lender severally, but not jointly, to fund its pro rata share of the Initial Term Loan, as defined in the Amendment, and Incremental Term Loan (as defined in the Amendment) subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Amendment; (v) the obligation of the Credit Parties, as defined in the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, to cause the Consolidated Secured Leverage Ratio (as defined in the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement) as of the end of any fiscal quarter, to be equal to or less than 40.0%; (vi) the Lenders’ waiver of the notice requirement regarding the change in name and form of organization of certain subsidiary guarantors (as set forth in the Amendment); and (vii)(iii) the addition of Bank of the West, or New Lender, as a party to the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement and a Term Loan Lender and Lender, (asas defined in the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement)Agreement, and New Lender’s agreement to be bound by all terms, provisions and conditions applicable to Lenders contained in the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement. As a result of the Amendment, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit was increased to $550,000,000.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
On December 20, 2018, we entered into a Commitment Increase Agreement with Bank of America. The material terms of the Commitment Increase Agreement provided for an increase in the 2016 Corporate Revolving Credit Facility by an aggregate amount equal to $25,000,000. On December 20, 2018, we also entered into an Amended and Restated Revolving Note with Bank of America, whereby we promised to pay the principal amount and accrued interest of each loan to the respective lender or its registered assigns, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, as amended. As a result of the Commitment Increase Agreement, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the 2016 Corporate Line Credit was increased to $575,000,000.
AtAs of December 31, 2018, our option,aggregate borrowing capacity under the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit would bearwas $575,000,000. As of December 31, 2018, borrowings outstanding under the 2016 Corporate Line of Credit totaled $548,500,000 and the weighted average interest rate on such borrowings outstanding was 4.60% per annum.
On January 25, 2019, we terminated the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, as amended, and the 2016 Corporate Revolving Notes and entered into the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit as described below. We currently do not have any obligations under the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, as amended, or the 2016 Corporate Revolving Notes.
2019 Corporate Line of Credit
On January 25, 2019, we, through our operating partnership and certain of our subsidiaries, entered into a credit agreement, or the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement, with Bank of America as administrative agent, a swing line lender and a letter of credit issuer; KeyBank, as syndication agent, a swing line lender and a letter of credit issuer; Citizens Bank, National Association, as a syndication agent, a swing line lender, a letter of credit issuer, a joint lead arranger and joint bookrunner; and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, to obtain a credit facility with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $630,000,000, or the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit. The 2019 Corporate Line of Credit consists of a senior unsecured revolving credit facility in the initial aggregate amount of $150,000,000 and a senior unsecured term loan facility in the initial aggregate amount of $480,000,000. We may obtain up to $25,000,000 in the form of standby letters of credit and up to $25,000,000 in the form of swing line loans. The maximum principal amount of the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit may be increased by up to $370,000,000, for a total principal amount of $1,000,000,000, subject to: (i) the terms of the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement; and (ii) at least five business days’ prior written notice to Bank of America.
At our option, the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit bears interest at per annum rates equal to:to (a) (i)(a) the Eurodollar Rate, (asas defined in the 20162019 Corporate Credit Agreement, as amended) plus (b)(ii) a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.20% per annum based on our and our consolidated subsidiaries’ consolidated leverage ratio;Consolidated Leverage Ratio, as defined in the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement, or (ii)(a)(b) (i) the greatestgreater of: (1) the prime rate publicly announced by Bank of America, (2) the Federal Funds Rate, (asas defined in the 20162019 Corporate Credit Agreement, as amended) plus 0.50% per annum,, (3) the one-month Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, as amended) plus 1.00% per annum, and (4) 0.00%, plus (b)(ii) a margin ranging from 0.50% to 1.20% per annum based on our consolidated leverage ratio.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Consolidated Leverage Ratio. Accrued interest on the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit is payable monthly. The loans may be repaid in whole or in part without prepayment premium or penalty, subject to certain conditions. We wereare required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the lenders’ commitments under the 20162019 Corporate Revolving Credit Facility in an amountAgreement at a per annum rate equal to 0.30% per annum on the actual average daily unused portion of the available commitments0.20% if the average daily used amount is greater than 50% of actual usagethe commitments and 0.25% if the average daily used amount is less than 50.0% and in an amountor equal to 0.20% per annum on the actual average daily unused portion50% of the available commitments, ifwhich fee shall be measured and payable on a quarterly basis.
The 2019 Corporate Line of Credit matures on January 25, 2022, and may be extended for one 12-month period during the actual average daily usage is greater than 50.0%. Such fee was payable quarterly in arrears. We were also required to pay a fee on the unused portionterm of the lenders’ commitments under the 2016 Corporate Term Loan Facility in2019 Credit Agreement, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an amount equal to: (i) 0.25% per annum multiplied by (ii) the actual daily amount of the unused Term Loan Commitments, as defined in the 2016extension fee. The 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement as amended, during the period for which payment is made. The unused fee on the 2016 Corporate Term Loan Facility was payable quarterly in arrears.
The 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, as amended, containedcontains various affirmative and negative covenants that wereare customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type, including limitations on the incurrence of debt by our operating partnership and its subsidiaries and limitations on secured recourse indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017,2019, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the 20162019 Corporate Line of Credit was $575,000,000 and $550,000,000, respectively.$630,000,000. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017,2019, borrowings outstanding under the 20162019 Corporate Line of Credit totaled $548,500,000 and $444,000,000, respectively,$557,000,000 and the weighted average interest rate on such borrowings outstanding was 4.60% and 3.23%3.83% per annum, respectively.annum.
On January 25, 2019, we terminated the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, as amended, and the 2016 Corporate Revolving Notes and entered into a new credit agreement. See Note 23, Subsequent Events — 2019 Corporate Line of Credit, for a further discussion.
Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit
OnIn connection with our acquisition of Trilogy, on December 1, 2015, in connection with the acquisition of Trilogy, our majority-owned subsidiary, we, through Trilogy PropCo Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an indirect subsidiary of Trilogy, or Trilogy PropCo Parent, and certain of its subsidiaries, or the Trilogy PropCo Co-Borrowers, and, together with Trilogy PropCo Parent, the Trilogy PropCo Borrowers, entered into a loan agreement, or the Trilogy PropCo Credit Agreement, with KeyBank, as administrative agent; Regions Bank, as syndication agent; and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, to obtain a line of credit with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $300,000,000, or the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit.
On December 1, 2015, we also entered into separate revolving
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
notes with each of KeyBank and Regions Bank, whereby we promised to pay the principal amount of each revolving loan and accrued interest to the respective lender or its registered assigns, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Trilogy PropCo Credit Agreement. The proceeds of the loans made under the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit may be used for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisition of properties and fee interests in leasehold properties and general corporate purposes. The Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit has a four-year term, maturingwould have matured on December 1, 2019, unless extended for a one year period subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee or otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms thereunder. Availability of the total commitment under the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit is subject to a borrowing base based on, among other things, the appraised value of certain real estate and villa units constructed on such real estate.2019.
In addition to paying interest on the outstanding principal under the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit, the Trilogy PropCo Borrowers are required to pay an unused fee to the lenders in respect of the unutilized commitments at a rate equal to an initial rate of 0.25% per annum, subject to adjustment depending on usage. Outstanding amounts under the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time, without penalty or premium, subject to customary breakage costs. The Trilogy PropCo Credit Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants that are customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type, including incurrence of debt and limitations on secured recourse indebtedness.
Provided that no default or event of default has occurred and subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Trilogy PropCo Credit Agreement, the Trilogy PropCo Borrowers had the option, at any time and from time to time, before the maturity date, to request an increase of the total maximum principal amount by $100,000,000 to $400,000,000. On October 27, 2017, we entered into an amendment to the Trilogy PropCo Credit Agreement, or the Trilogy PropCo Amendment, with KeyBank, as administrative agent, and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, to amend the terms of the Trilogy PropCo Credit Agreement. The material terms of the Trilogy PropCo Amendment provide for: (i)included a reduction of the total commitment under the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit from $300,000,000 to $250,000,000; (ii) a revision$250,000,000.
On September 5, 2019, we entered into an amended and restated loan agreement, or the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, to further amend the definitionTrilogy PropCo Credit Agreement and to replace the terms of applicable margin, pursuant to which the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit bears interest at a floating rate based on an adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable marginwith the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, as further discussed below in the “2019 Trilogy Credit Facility” section. As of 4.00% per annum or an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin of
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
3.00% per annum, at the Trilogy PropCo Borrowers’ option; and (iii) the Trilogy PropCo Borrowers’ obligation to pay to KeyBank the unused fee that has accrued with respect to the portion of the total commitment being reduced.
OurDecember 31, 2018, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit was $250,000,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.$250,000,000. As of December 31, 2018, and 2017, borrowings outstanding under the Trilogy PropCo Line of Credit totaled $170,518,000 and $179,376,000, respectively, and the weighted average interest rate on such borrowingsborrowing outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 6.45% and 5.39% per annum, respectively.annum.
Trilogy OpCo Line of Credit
On March 21, 2016, we, through Trilogy Healthcare Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct subsidiary of Trilogy, and certain of its subsidiaries, or the Trilogy OpCo Borrowers, entered into a credit agreement, or the Trilogy OpCo Credit Agreement, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, or Wells Fargo, N.A., as administrative agent and lender; and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, to obtain a $42,000,000 secured revolving credit facility, or the Trilogy OpCo Line of Credit. The Trilogy OpCo Line of Credit is secured primarily by residents’ receivables of the Trilogy OpCo Borrowers. The terms of the Trilogy OpCo Credit Agreement provided for a one-time increase during the term of the agreement by up to $18,000,000, for a maximum principal amount of $60,000,000, subject to certain conditions.
On April 1, 2016, we entered into an amendment to the Trilogy OpCo Credit Agreement to increase the aggregate maximum principal amount of the Trilogy OpCo Line of Credit to $60,000,000. In April 2018, we further amended the Trilogy OpCo Credit Agreement or the Trilogy OpCo Amendment. The material terms of the Trilogy OpCo Amendmentto provide for: (i) a reduction in the aggregate maximum principal amount from $60,000,000 to $25,000,000; (ii) a reduced floating interest rate based on LIBOR, plus an applicable margin of 2.75% per annum, for LIBOR Rate Loans, as defined in the agreement, or an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin of 1.75% per annum, for Base Rate Loans, as defined in the agreement, at the Trilogy OpCo Borrowers’ option; (iii) a reduced letter of credit fee of 2.75% per annum times the undrawn amount of outstanding letters of credit; and (iv)(ii) an updated maturity date of April 27, 2021. Accrued interest under
On September 5, 2019, we paid off and terminated the Trilogy OpCo Line of Credit, as amended, and replaced it with the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, as described below. As a result of such termination, we incurred a loss on extinguishment of $786,000, which is payable monthly.recorded to interest expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and was primarily related to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees. The source of funds for the payoff was from the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility.
In addition to paying interest on the outstanding principalWe currently do not have any obligations under the Trilogy OpCo Line of Credit, the Trilogy OpCo Borrowers are required to pay an unused fee in an amount equal to 0.50% per annum times the average monthly unutilized commitment. The unused fee is payable monthly in arrears, commencing on the first day of each month from and after the closing date up to the first day of the month prior to the date on which the obligations are paid in full. If the commitment is terminated prior to the second anniversary of the closing date, a prepayment premium of 1.00% of the total commitment applies.
The Trilogy OpCo Credit Agreement, as amended, contains customary events of default, covenants and other terms, including, among other things, restrictions on the payment of dividends and other distributions, incurrence of indebtedness, creation of liens and transactions with affiliates. Availability of the total commitment under the Trilogy OpCo Line of Credit is subject to a borrowing base based on, among other things, the eligible accounts receivable outstanding of the Trilogy OpCo Borrowers.
amended. As of December 31, 2018, and 2017, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the Trilogy OpCo Line of Credit was $25,000,000, and $60,000,000, respectively, subject to certain terms and conditions. As of December 31, 2018, and 2017, borrowings outstanding under the Trilogy OpCo Line of Credit totaled $19,030,000 and $749,000, respectively,the weighted average interest rate on such borrowings outstanding was 5.17% per annum.
2019 Trilogy Credit Facility
As discussed above, on September 5, 2019, we, through Trilogy RER, LLC and certain subsidiaries of Trilogy OpCo, LLC, Trilogy RER, LLC, and Trilogy Pro Services, LLC, or the 2019 Trilogy Co-Borrowers, entered into the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement with KeyBank, as administrative agent; CIT Bank, N.A., or CIT Bank, as revolving agent; Regions Bank, as syndication agent; KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., or KeyBanc Capital Markets, as co-lead arranger and co-book runner; Regions Capital Markets, as co-lead arranger and co-book runner; Bank of America as co-documentation agent; The Huntington National Bank, as co-documentation agent; and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders named therein, to amend and restate the terms of the Trilogy PropCo Credit Agreement to obtain a senior secured revolving credit facility with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $360,000,000, consisting of: (i) a $325,000,000 secured revolver supported by real estate assets and ancillary business cash flow and (ii) a $35,000,000 accounts receivable revolving credit facility supported by eligible accounts receivable, or the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility. We may obtain up to $35,000,000 in the form of swing line loans and up to $15,000,000 in the form of standby letters of credit. The proceeds of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility may be used for acquisitions, debt repayment and general corporate purposes. The maximum principal amount of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility may be increased by up to $140,000,000, for a total principal amount of $500,000,000, subject to: (i) the terms of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement and (ii) at least 10 business days’ prior written notice to KeyBank.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
At our option, the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility bears interest at per annum rates equal to (a) LIBOR plus 2.75% for LIBOR Rate Loans, as defined in the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, and (b) for Base Rate Loans, as defined in the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, 1.75% plus the greater of: (i) the fluctuating annual rate of interest announced from time to time by KeyBank as its prime rate, (ii) 0.5% above the Federal Funds Effective Rate, as defined in the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, and (iii) 1.00% above the one-month LIBOR. Accrued interest on the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility is payable monthly. The loans may be repaid in whole or in part without prepayment fees or penalty, subject to certain conditions. We are required to pay fees on the unused portion of the lenders’ commitments under the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, with respect to any day during a calendar quarter, at a per annum rate equal to (a) 0.15% if the sum of the Aggregate Real Estate Revolving Credit Obligations, as defined in the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, outstanding on such day is greater than 50% of the commitments or 0.20% if the sum of the Aggregate Real Estate Revolving Credit Obligations on such day is less than or equal to 50% of the commitments, and (b) 0.15% if the sum of the Aggregate A/R Revolving Credit Obligations, as defined in the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement, outstanding on such day is greater than 50% of the commitments or 0.20% if the sum of the Aggregate A/R Revolving Credit Obligations on such day is less than or equal to 50% of the commitments, which fees shall be measured and payable on a quarterly basis.
The 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility matures on September 5, 2023 and may be extended for one 12-month period during the term of the 2019 Trilogy Credit Agreement subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee.
As of December 31, 2019, our aggregate borrowing capacity under the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility was $360,000,000. As of December 31, 2019, borrowings outstanding under the 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility totaled $258,879,000 and the weighted average interest rate on such borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was 5.17% and 5.84%4.52% per annum, respectively.annum.
9. Derivative Financial Instruments
Consistent with ASC Topic 815, weWe record derivative financial instruments in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets as either an asset or a liability measured at fair value. The following table lists the derivative financial instruments held by us as of December 31, 2019 and 2018: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Fair Value |
| | | | | | | | | | | December 31, |
| Instrument | | Notional Amount | | Index | | Interest Rate | | Maturity Date | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Swap | | $ | 140,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 0.82% | | 02/03/19 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 221,000 |
|
| Swap | | 60,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 0.78% | | 02/03/19 | | — |
| | 97,000 |
|
| Swap | | 50,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 1.39% | | 02/03/19 | | — |
| | 51,000 |
|
| Cap | | 20,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 3.00% | | 09/23/21 | | — |
| | 48,000 |
|
| Swap | | 250,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 2.10% | | 01/25/22 | | (2,821,000 | ) | | — |
|
| Swap | | 130,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 1.98% | | 01/25/22 | | (1,150,000 | ) | | — |
|
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | $ | (3,971,000 | ) | | $ | 417,000 |
|
ASC Topic 815 permits special hedge accounting if certain requirements are met. Hedge accounting allows for gains and losses on derivatives designated as hedges to be offset by the change in value of the hedged item or items or to be deferred in other comprehensive income (loss).
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table lists the derivative financial instruments held by us as of December 31, 2018 and 2017: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Fair Value |
| | | | | | | | | | | December 31, |
| Instrument | | Notional Amount | | Index | | Interest Rate | | Maturity Date | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Swap | | 140,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 0.82% | | 02/03/19 | | $ | 221,000 |
| | $ | 1,486,000 |
|
| Swap | | 60,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 0.78% | | 02/03/19 | | 97,000 |
| | 661,000 |
|
| Swap | | 50,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 1.39% | | 02/03/19 | | 51,000 |
| | 219,000 |
|
| Cap | | 20,000,000 |
| | one month LIBOR | | 3.00% | | 09/23/21 | | 48,000 |
| | — |
|
| | | $ | 270,000,000 |
| | | | | | | | $ | 417,000 |
| | $ | 2,366,000 |
|
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, none of our derivative financial instruments were designated as hedges. Derivative financial instruments not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements, but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of ASC Topic 815. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are recorded as a component of interest expense in gain or (loss) in fair value of derivative financial instruments in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017, we recorded $(1,949,000)$(4,541,000), $383,000$(1,949,000) and $1,968,000,$383,000, respectively, as an (increase) decrease to interest expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) related to the change in the fair value of our derivative financial instruments.
See Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, for a further discussion of the fair value of our derivative financial instruments.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
10. Identified Intangible Liabilities, Net
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, identified intangible liabilities, net consisted of below-market leases of $1,051,000$663,000 and $1,568,000,$1,051,000, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $1,229,000$1,342,000 and $1,135,000,$1,229,000, respectively. Amortization expense on below-market leases for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $388,000, $517,000 and 2016 was $517,000, $658,000, and $651,000, respectively. Amortization expense on below-market leasesrespectively, which is recorded to real estate revenue in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
The weighted average remaining life of below-market leases was 4.3 years and 4.8 years as of both December 31, 20182019 and 2017, respectively.2018. As of December 31, 2018,2019, estimated amortization expense on below-market leases for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter was as follows:
| | | Year | | Amount | | Amount |
| 2019 | | $ | 388,000 |
| |
| 2020 | | 260,000 |
| | $ | 260,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 143,000 |
| | 143,000 |
|
| 2022 | | 93,000 |
| | 93,000 |
|
| 2023 | | 78,000 |
| | 78,000 |
|
| 2024 | | | 35,000 |
|
| Thereafter | | 89,000 |
| | 54,000 |
|
| | | $ | 1,051,000 |
| | $ | 663,000 |
|
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us, which if determined unfavorably to us, would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Environmental Matters
We follow a policy of monitoring our properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist at our properties, we are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to our properties that would have a material effect on our consolidated financial position,
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
results of operations or cash flows. Further, we are not aware of any material environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.
Other
Our other commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real estate owners and operators in the normal course of business, which include calls/puts to sell/acquire properties. In our view, these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
12. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
On January 15, 2013, our advisor made an initial capital contribution of $2,000 to our operating partnership in exchange for 222 limited partnership units. Upon the effectiveness of the Advisory Agreement on February 26, 2014, Griffin-American Advisor became our advisor. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we owned greater than a 99.99% general partnership interest in our operating partnership, and our advisor owned less than a 0.01% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership. As our advisor, Griffin-American Advisor is entitled to special redemption rights of its limited partnership units. The noncontrolling interest of our advisor in our operating partnership that has redemption features outside of our control is accounted for as a redeemable noncontrolling interest and is presented outside of permanent equity in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. See Note 14, Related Party Transactions — Liquidity Stage — Subordinated Participation Interest — Subordinated Distribution Upon Listing and Note 14, Related Party Transactions — Subordinated Distribution Upon Termination, for a further discussion of the redemption features of the limited partnership units.
On
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As of December 1, 2015,31, 2019 and 2018, we, through Trilogy REIT Holdings, LLC, or Trilogy REIT Holdings, in which we indirectly hold a 70.0% ownership interest, pursuant to an equity purchase agreement with Trilogyowned 96.6% and other seller parties thereto, completed the acquisition of approximately 96.7%, respectively, of the outstanding equity interestsinterest of Trilogy. Pursuant to the equity purchase agreement, at the closingAs of the acquisition,December 31, 2019 and 2018, certain members of Trilogy’s pre-closing management retained a portion of the outstanding equity interests of Trilogy held by suchand certain members of an advisory committee to Trilogy’s pre-closing management, representing in the aggregateboard of directors owned approximately 3.4% and 3.3%, respectively, of the outstanding equity interests of Trilogy. The noncontrolling interests held by Trilogy’s pre-closing managementsuch members have redemption features outside of our control and are accounted for as redeemable noncontrolling interests in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of both December 31, 2018 and 2017, Trilogy REIT Holdings and certain members of Trilogy’s pre-closing management owned approximately 96.7% and 3.3% of Trilogy, respectively.
We record the carrying amount of redeemable noncontrolling interests at the greater of: (i) the initial carrying amount, increased or decreased for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income or loss and distributions or (ii) the redemption value. The changes in the carrying amount of redeemable noncontrolling interests consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
| | | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 32,435,000 |
| | $ | 31,507,000 |
| | $ | 38,245,000 |
| | $ | 32,435,000 |
|
| Additions | | 535,000 |
| | 975,000 |
| | 2,000,000 |
| | 535,000 |
|
| Reclassification from equity | | 780,000 |
| | 635,000 |
| | 780,000 |
| | 780,000 |
|
| Distributions | | | (1,430,000 | ) | | (711,000 | ) |
| Repurchase of redeemable noncontrolling interests | | (229,000 | ) | | (61,000 | ) | | (400,000 | ) | | (229,000 | ) |
| Distributions | | (711,000 | ) | | (1,184,000 | ) | |
| Fair value adjustment to redemption value | | 5,301,000 |
| | 1,155,000 |
| | 4,473,000 |
| | 5,301,000 |
|
| Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | 134,000 |
| | (592,000 | ) | |
| Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | | 437,000 |
| | 134,000 |
|
| Ending balance | | $ | 38,245,000 |
| | $ | 32,435,000 |
| | $ | 44,105,000 |
| | $ | 38,245,000 |
|
13. Equity
Preferred Stock
Our charter authorizes us to issue 200,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, par value $0.01$0.01 per share. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Common Stock
Our charter authorizes us to issue 1,000,000,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share. On January 15, 2013, our advisor acquired 22,222 shares of our common stock for total cash consideration of $200,000$200,000 and was admitted as our initial stockholder. We used the proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock to our advisor to make an initial capital contribution to our operating partnership. On March 12, 2015, we terminated the primary portion of our initial public offering. We continued to offer shares of our common stock in our initial offering pursuant to the Initial DRIP, until the termination of the DRIP portion of our initial offering and deregistration of our initial offering on April 22, 2015.
On March 25, 2015, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to register a maximum of $250,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering. We commenceddid not commence offering shares pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering until April 22, 2015, following the deregistration of our initial offering on April 22, 2015.offering. We intend to continuecontinued to offer shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering until the termination and deregistration of such offering. See Note 23, Subsequent Events —the 2015 DRIP Offering on March 29, 2019.
On January 30, 2019, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to register a maximum of $200,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering, for a discussion ofOffering. The Registration Statement on Form S-3 was automatically effective with the SEC upon its filing; however, we did not commence offering shares pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering which will commence immediatelyuntil April 1, 2019, following the terminationderegistration of the 2015 DRIP Offering.
Through December 31, 2018,2019, we had issued 184,930,598 shares of our common stock in connection with the primary portion of our initial public offering and 26,820,01032,733,694 shares of our common stock pursuant to the Initialour DRIP and the 2015 DRIP Offering.Offerings. We also repurchased 14,320,45323,846,540 shares of our common stock under our share repurchase plan and granted an aggregate of 105,000127,500 shares of our restricted common stock to our independent directors through December 31, 2018.2019. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we had 197,557,377193,967,474 and 199,343,234197,557,377 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of noncontrolling interests, by component consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018: | | | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Beginning balance — foreign currency translation adjustments | | $ | (1,971,000 | ) | | $ | (3,029,000 | ) | | $ | (2,560,000 | ) | | $ | (1,971,000 | ) |
| Net change in current period | | (589,000 | ) | | 1,058,000 |
| | 305,000 |
| | (589,000 | ) |
| Ending balance — foreign currency translation adjustments | | $ | (2,560,000 | ) | | $ | (1,971,000 | ) | | $ | (2,255,000 | ) | | $ | (2,560,000 | ) |
Noncontrolling Interests
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, Trilogy REIT Holdings owned approximately 96.6% and 96.7% of Trilogy.Trilogy, respectively. We are the indirect owner of a 70.0% interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings pursuant to a joint venture agreement, or the Trilogy JV Agreement, with an indirect, wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc., or NHI. We serve as the sole manager of Trilogy REIT Holdings. Prior to October 1, 2018, NHI was the indirect owner of the remaining 30.0% interest in Trilogy REIT Holdings. On October 1, 2018, we entered intoamended the Amended Trilogy JV Agreement as a result of the purchase by an indirect, wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of the operating partnership of Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc., or GAHR IV JV Member, of 6.0% of the total membership interests in Trilogy REIT Holdings from a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of NHI. Both Griffin-American Healthcare REIT IV, Inc. and us are sponsored by American Healthcare Investors. Effective October 1, 2018, NHI and GAHR IV JV Member indirectly own a 24.0% and 6.0% membership interest, respectively, in Trilogy REIT Holdings. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, 30.0% of the net earnings of Trilogy REIT Holdings were allocated to noncontrolling interests.
In connection with theour acquisition and operation of Trilogy, profit interest units in Trilogy, or the Profit Interests, were issued to Trilogy Management Services, LLC and an independent director of Trilogy, both unaffiliated third parties that manage or direct the day-to-day operations of Trilogy. The Profit Interests consist of time-based or performance-based commitments. The time-based Profit Interests were measured at their grant date fair value and vest in increments of 20.0% on each anniversary of the respective grant date over a five-year period. We amortize the time-based Profit Interests on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods, which are recorded to general and administrative in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). The performance-based Profit Interests are subject to a performance commitment and vest upon liquidity events as defined in the Profit Interests agreements. The performance-based Profit Interests were measured at their grant date fair value and immediately expensed. The performance-based Profit Interests are subject to fair value measurements until vesting occurs with changes to fair value recorded to general and administrative in our
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we recognized stock compensation expense related to the Profit Interests of $2,744,000, $2,898,000 $936,000 and $1,329,000,$936,000, respectively.
There were no canceled, expired or exercised Profit Interests during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016.2017. The nonvested awards are presented as noncontrolling interests and are re-classified to redeemable noncontrolling interests upon vesting as they have redemption features outside of our control similar to the common stock units held by Trilogy’s pre-closing management. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, for a further discussion.
On January 6, 2016, one of our consolidated subsidiaries issued non-voting preferred shares of beneficial interests to qualified investors for total proceeds of $125,000. These preferred shares of beneficial interests are entitled to receive cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 12.5% per annum. In accordance with ASC Topic 810, weWe classify the value of the subsidiary’s preferred shares of beneficial interests as noncontrolling interests in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the dividends of the preferred shares of beneficial interests as net lossincome attributable to noncontrolling interests in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
In addition, as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we owned an 86.0% interest in a consolidated limited liability company that owns Lakeview IN Medical Plaza, which we acquired on January 21, 2016. As such, 14.0% of the net earnings of Lakeview IN Medical Plaza were allocated to noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016.2017.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
We adopted the Initial DRIP that allowed stockholders to purchase additional shares of our common stock through the reinvestment of distributions at an offering price equal to 95.0% of the primary offering price of our initial offering, subject to certain conditions. We had registered and reserved $35,000,000 in shares of our common stock for sale pursuant to the Initial DRIP in our initial offering, at an offering price of $9.50 per share, which we terminatedderegistered on April 22, 2015. On March 25, 2015, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to register a maximum of $250,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering. The Registration Statement on Form S-3 was automatically effective with the SEC upon its filing; however, we did not commenceWe commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering, until April 22, 2015, following the deregistration of our initial offering.offering on April 22, 2015. We continued to offer shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering until the deregistration of such offering on March 29, 2019. On January 30, 2019, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to register a maximum of $200,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering. We commenced offering shares pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering on April 1, 2019, following the deregistration of the 2015 DRIP Offering.
Effective October 5, 2016, we amended and restated the Initial DRIP, or the Amended and Restated DRIP to amend the price at which shares of our common stock are issued pursuant to the 2015 DRIP Offering.such distribution reinvestment plan. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated DRIP, shares are issued at a price equal to the most recently estimated net asset value, or NAV, of one share of our common stock, as approved and established by our board. The Amended and Restated DRIP became effective with the distribution payment to stockholders paid in the month of November 2016. In all other material respects, the terms of the 2015 DRIP Offering remainremained unchanged by the Amended and Restated DRIP.
Since October 5, 2016, our board has approved and established an estimated per share net asset value, or NAV on at least an annual basis. Commencing with the distribution payment to stockholders paid in the month following such board approval, shares of our common stock issued pursuant to the Amended and Restated DRIP were or will be issued at the current estimated per share NAV until such time as our board determines an updated estimated per share NAV. The following is a summary of our historical and current estimated per share NAV: | | | Approval Date by our Board | | Estimated Per Share NAV | | Estimated Per Share NAV |
| 10/05/16 | | $ | 9.01 |
| | $ | 9.01 |
|
| 10/04/17 | | $ | 9.27 |
| | $ | 9.27 |
|
| 10/03/18 | | $ | 9.37 |
| | $ | 9.37 |
|
| 10/03/19 | | | $ | 9.40 |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, $55,440,000, $60,030,000 and 2016, $60,030,000, $63,008,000, and $64,604,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested and 5,913,684, 6,464,432 6,960,664 and 6,861,6476,960,664 shares of our common stock, respectively, were issued pursuant to the 2015our DRIP Offering.Offerings. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, a total of $249,711,000$305,151,000 and $189,681,000,$249,711,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested that resulted in 26,820,01032,733,694 and 20,355,57826,820,010 shares of our common stock, respectively, being issued pursuant to our DRIP Offerings.
See Note 23, Subsequent Events — 2019 DRIP Offering, for a further discussion.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Share Repurchase Plan
Our board has approved a share repurchase plan. Our share repurchase plan, which allows for repurchases of shares of our common stock by us when certain criteria are met. Share repurchases will be made at the sole discretion of our board. Subject to the availability of the funds for share repurchases, we will generally limit the number of shares of our common stock repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock will come exclusively from the cumulative proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings. Additionally, effective with respect to share repurchase requests submitted for repurchase during the second quarter 2019, the number of shares that we will repurchase during any fiscal quarter will be limited to an amount equal to the net proceeds that we received from the sale of shares issued pursuant to theour DRIP Offerings during the immediately preceding completed fiscal quarter; provided however, that shares subject to a repurchase requested upon the death or qualifying“qualifying disability,” as defined in our share repurchase plan, of a stockholder will not be subject to this quarterly cap or to our existing cap on repurchases toof 5.0% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the calendar year prior to the repurchase date. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common stock will come from the cumulative proceeds we receive from the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings. Furthermore, our share repurchase plan, as amended, provides that if there are insufficient funds to honor all repurchase requests, pending requests willmay be honored among all requests for repurchase in any given repurchase period as follows: first, repurchases in full as to repurchases that would result in a stockholder owning less than $2,500 of shares, which may be redeemed in full;shares; and, next, pro rata as to other repurchase requests.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
All repurchases will be subject to a one-year holding period, except for repurchases made in connection with a stockholder’s death or “qualifying disability,” as defined in our share repurchase plan.qualifying disability. Further, all share repurchases will be repurchased following a one-year holding period at a price between 92.5% and 100% of each stockholder’s repurchase amount, depending on the period of time their shares have been held. Until October 4, 2016, the repurchase amount for shares repurchased under our share repurchase plan was equal to the lesser of the amount a stockholder paid for their shares of our common stock or the most recent per share offering price. However, if shares of our common stock were repurchased in connection with a stockholder’s death or qualifying disability, the repurchase price was no less than 100% of the price paid to acquire the shares of our common stock from us.
Effective with respect to share repurchase requests submitted during the fourth quarter 2016, the Repurchase Amount, as such term is defined in our share repurchase plan, as amended, is equal to the lesser of (i) the amount per share that a stockholder paid for their shares of our common stock, or (ii) the most recent estimated value of one share of our common stock, as determined by our board. Accordingly, commencing with the share repurchase requests submitted during the fourth quarter 2016, we repurchase shares as follows: (a) for stockholders who have continuously held their shares of our common stock for at least one year, the price will be 92.5% of the Repurchase Amount; (b) for stockholders who have continuously held their shares of our common stock for at least two years, the price will be 95.0% of the Repurchase Amount; (c) for stockholders who have continuously held their shares of our common stock for at least three years, the price will be 97.5% of the Repurchase Amount; (d) for stockholders who have held their shares of our common stock for at least four years, the price will be 100% of the Repurchase Amount; and (e) for requests submitted pursuant to a death or a qualifying disability, the price will be 100% of the amount per share the stockholder paid for their shares of common stock (in each case, as adjusted for any stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to our common stock).
Since October 5, 2016, our board has approved and established an estimated per share NAV on at least an annual basis. See the summary of our historical and current estimated per share NAV in the “Distribution Reinvestment Plan” section above. Accordingly, commencing with share repurchase requests submitted during the quarter that our board has approved and established an estimated per share NAV, such NAV per share NAV served or will serve as the Repurchase Amount for stockholders who purchased their shares at a price equal to or greater than such NAV per share NAV in our initial offering, until such time as our board determines an updated estimated per share NAV.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we received share repurchase requests of 15,030,794, 8,272,789 and 3,419,969 shares of our common stock, respectively, and repurchased 9,526,087, 8,272,789 3,419,969 and 2,246,7663,419,969 shares of our common stock, respectively, for an aggregate of $89,888,000, $76,577,000 $30,656,000 and $20,941,000,$30,656,000, respectively, at an average repurchase price of $9.44, $9.26 $8.96 and $9.32$8.96 per share, respectively.
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we received cumulative share repurchase requests 29,351,247 and 14,320,453 shares of our common stock, respectively, and repurchased 14,320,45323,846,540 and 6,047,66414,320,453 shares of our common stock, respectively, for an aggregate of $131,935,000$221,823,000 and $55,358,000,$131,935,000, respectively, at an average repurchase price of $9.21$9.30 and $9.15$9.21 per share, respectively. All sharesShares were repurchased using proceeds we received from the cumulative sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRIP Offerings.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2013 Incentive Plan
We adopted our incentive plan pursuant to which our board, or a committee of our independent directors, may make grants of options, shares of our common stock, stock purchase rights, stock appreciation rights or other awards to our independent directors, employees and consultants. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to our incentive plan is 2,000,000 shares.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we granted 22,500 22,500 and 30,000 shares of our restricted common stock respectively, at a weighted average grant date fair value of $9.37, $9.27 $9.01 and $10.00$9.01 per share, respectively, to our independent directors in connection with their election or re-election to our board or in consideration for their past services rendered. Such shares vest as to 20.0% of the shares on the date of grant and on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we recognized stock compensation expense related to the independent director grants of $215,000, $215,000 and $216,000, and $196,000, respectively, whichrespectively. Such stock compensation expense is included in general and administrative in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
14. Related Party Transactions
Fees and Expenses Paid to Affiliates
All of our executive officers and our non-independent directors are also executive officers and employees and/or holders of a direct or indirect interest in our advisor, one of our co-sponsors or other affiliated entities. We are affiliated with our advisor, American Healthcare Investors and AHI Group Holdings; however, we are not affiliated with Griffin Capital, our dealer manager, Colony Capital or Mr. Flaherty. We entered into the Advisory Agreement, which entitles our advisor and its affiliates to specified compensation for certain services, as well as reimbursement of certain expenses. Our board, including a majority of our independent directors, has reviewed the material transactions between our affiliates and us during the year ended December 31, 2018.2019. Set forth below is a description of the transactions with affiliates. We believe that we have executed all of the transactions set forth below on terms that are fair and reasonable to us and on terms no less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties. In the aggregate, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we incurred $25,064,000, $24,266,000 $23,698,000 and $29,494,000,$23,698,000, respectively, in fees and expenses to our affiliates as detailed below.
Acquisition and Development Stage
Acquisition Fee
We pay our advisor or its affiliates an acquisition fee of up to 2.25% of the contract purchase price, including any contingent or earn-out payments that may be paid, for each property we acquire or 2.00% of the origination or acquisition price, including any contingent or earn-out payments that may be paid, for any real estate-related investment we originate or acquire. Since January 31, 2015, acquisition fees are and have been paid in cash. Our advisor or its affiliates are entitled to receive these acquisition fees for properties and real estate-related investments we acquire with funds raised in our initial offering including acquisitions completed after the termination of the Advisory Agreement, or funded with net proceeds from the sale of a property or real estate-related investment, subject to certain conditions.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we incurred $1,124,000, $1,194,000 $1,922,000 and $9,591,000,$1,922,000, respectively, in acquisition fees to our advisor. Acquisition fees in connection with the acquisition of properties accounted for as asset acquisitions or the acquisition of real estate-related investments are capitalized as part of the associated investments in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Acquisition fees in connection with the acquisition of investments accounted for as business combinations in accordance with ASC Topic 805 are expensed as incurred and included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Acquisition fees in connection with the acquisition of properties accounted for as asset acquisitions in accordance with ASU 2017-01 or the acquisition of real estate-related investments are capitalized as part of the associated investments in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Development Fee
In the event our advisor or its affiliates provide development-related services, our advisor or its affiliates receive a development fee in an amount that is usual and customary for comparable services rendered for similar projects in the geographic market where the services are provided; however, we will not pay a development fee to our advisor or its affiliates if our advisor or its affiliates elect to receive an acquisition fee based on the cost of such development.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we incurred $346,000, $137,000 $104,000 and $182,000,$104,000, respectively, in development fees to our advisor or its affiliates. Until December 31, 2017, development fees were expensed and included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Since January 1, 2017, as a result of our adoption of ASU 2017-01, development feesaffiliates, which are capitalized as part of the associated asset and included in real estate investments net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Reimbursement of Acquisition Expenses
We reimburse our advisor or its affiliates for acquisition expenses related to selecting, evaluating and acquiring assets, which are reimbursed regardless of whether an asset is acquired. The reimbursement of acquisition expenses, acquisition fees, total development costs, real estate commissions or other fees paid to unaffiliated third parties will not exceed, in the aggregate, 6.0% of the contract purchase price or real estate-related investments, unless fees in excess of such limits are approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, such fees and expenses noted above did not exceed 6.0% of the contract purchase price of our property acquisitions of real estate or real estate-related investments, except with respect to our acquisition of Crown Senior Care Portfolio. Pursuant to our charter, prior to the acquisition of Crown Senior Care Portfolio, our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction, approved the reimbursement of fees and expenses to our advisor or its affiliates in connection with the acquisition of Crown Senior Care Portfolio in excess of 6.0% limit and determined that such fees and expenses were commercially fair and reasonable to us.investments.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we did not incur any acquisition expenses to our advisor or its affiliates. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we incurred $1,000 in acquisition expenses to our advisor or its affiliates. Reimbursements of acquisition expenses in connection with the acquisition of properties accounted for as business combinations are expensed as incurred and included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Reimbursements of acquisition expenses in connection with the acquisition of properties accounted for as asset acquisitions or the acquisition of real estate-related investments are capitalized as part of the associated investments in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Operational Stage
Asset Management Fee
We pay our advisor or its affiliates a monthly fee for services rendered in connection with the management of our assets equal to one-twelfth of 0.75% of average invested assets, subject to our stockholders receiving distributions in an amount equal to 5.0% per annum, cumulative, non-compounded, of invested capital. For such purposes, average invested assets means the average of the aggregate book value of our assets invested in real estate and real estate-related investments, before deducting depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of such values at the end of each month during the period of calculation; and invested capital means, for a specified period, the aggregate issue price of shares of our common stock purchased by our stockholders, reduced by distributions of net sales proceeds by us to our stockholders and by any amounts paid by us to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we incurred $20,073,000, $19,373,000 $18,793,000 and $16,949,000,$18,793,000, respectively, in asset management fees to our advisor or its affiliates. Asset management fees are included in general and administrative in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Property Management Fee
Our advisor or its affiliates may directly serve as property manager of our properties or may sub-contract their property management duties to any third party and provide oversight of such third-party property manager. We pay our advisor or its affiliates a monthly management fee equal to a percentage of the gross monthly cash receipts of such property as follows: (i) a property management oversight fee of 1.0% of the gross monthly cash receipts of any stand-alone, single-tenant, net leased property; (ii) a property management oversight fee of 1.5% of the gross monthly cash receipts of any property that is not a stand-alone, single-tenant, net leased property and for which our advisor or its affiliates provide oversight of a third party that performs the duties of a property manager with respect to such property; or (iii) a fair and reasonable property management fee that is approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, that is not less favorable to us than terms available from unaffiliated third parties for any property that is not a stand-alone, single-tenant, net leased property and for which our advisor or its affiliates will directly serve as the property manager without sub-contracting such duties to a third party.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we incurred $2,611,000, $2,428,000 $2,358,000 and $2,313,000,$2,358,000, respectively, in property management fees to our advisor or its affiliates. Property management fees are included in property
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
operating expenses and rental expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Lease Fees
We pay our advisor or its affiliates a separate fee for any leasing activities in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm’s-length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area. Such fee is generally expected to range from 3.0% to 6.0% of the gross revenues generated during the initial term of the lease.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we incurred $379,000, $843,000 $267,000 and $213,000,$267,000, respectively, in lease fees to our advisor or its affiliates. Lease fees are capitalized as lease commissions and included in other assets, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Construction Management Fee
In the event that our advisor or its affiliates assist with planning and coordinating the construction of any capital or tenant improvements, our advisor or its affiliates are paid a construction management fee of up to 5.0% of the cost of such improvements. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we incurred $320,000, $91,000 $46,000 and $80,000,$46,000, respectively, in construction management fees to our advisor or its affiliates.
Construction management fees are capitalized as part of the associated asset and included in real estate investments, net in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets or are expensed and included in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), as applicable.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Operating Expenses
We reimburse our advisor or its affiliates for operating expenses incurred in rendering services to us, subject to certain limitations. However, we cannot reimburse our advisor or its affiliates at the end of any fiscal quarter for total operating expenses that, in the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended, exceed the greater of: (i) 2.0% of our average invested assets, as defined in the Advisory Agreement; or (ii) 25.0% of our net income, as defined in the Advisory Agreement, unless our independent directors determined that such excess expenses were justified based on unusual and nonrecurring factors which they deem sufficient.
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, our operating expenses did not exceed the aforementioned limitations. The following table reflects our operating expenses as a percentage of average invested assets and as a percentage of net income for the 12 month periods then ended:
| | | | 12 months ended December 31, | 12 Months Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Operating expenses as a percentage of average invested assets | 0.9 | % | | 0.9 | % | | 1.0 | % | 0.9 | % | | 0.9 | % | | 0.9 | % |
| Operating expenses as a percentage of net income | 19.1 | % | | 16.6 | % | | 14.5 | % | 18.9 | % | | 19.1 | % | | 16.6 | % |
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, our advisor or its affiliates incurred operating expenses on our behalf of $211,000, $200,000 $208,000 and $165,000,$208,000, respectively. Operating expenses are generally included in general and administrative in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Compensation for Additional Services
We pay our advisor and its affiliates for services performed for us other than those required to be rendered by our advisor or its affiliates under the Advisory Agreement. The rate of compensation for these services has to be approved by a majority of our board, including a majority of our independent directors, and cannot exceed an amount that would be paid to unaffiliated third parties for similar services. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, our advisor and its affiliates were not compensated for any additional services.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Liquidity Stage
Disposition Fees
For services relating to the sale of one or more properties, we pay our advisor or its affiliates a disposition fee of up to the lesser of 2.0% of the contract sales price or 50.0% of a customary competitive real estate commission given the circumstances surrounding the sale, in each case as determined by our board, including a majority of our independent directors, upon the provision of a substantial amount of the services in the sales effort. The amount of disposition fees paid, when added to the real estate commissions paid to unaffiliated third parties, will not exceed the lesser of the customary competitive real estate commission or an amount equal to 6.0% of the contract sales price.
For the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2016,2018, we did not incur any disposition fees to our advisor or its affiliates. For the year ended December 31, 2017, our advisor agreed to waive the disposition fees that may otherwise have been due to our advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net — Dispositions of Real Estate Investments, for a further discussion.
Subordinated Participation Interest
Subordinated Distribution of Net Sales Proceeds
In the event of liquidation, we will pay our advisor a subordinated distribution of net sales proceeds. The distribution will be equal to 15.0% of the remaining net proceeds from the sales of properties, after distributions to our stockholders, in the aggregate, of: (i) a full return of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan); plus (ii) an annual 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock, as adjusted for distributions of net sales proceeds. Actual amounts to be received depend on the sale prices of properties upon liquidation. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we did not pay any such distributions to our advisor.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Subordinated Distribution Upon Listing
Upon the listing of shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, in redemption of our advisor’s limited partnership units, we will pay our advisor a distribution equal to 15.0% of the amount by which: (i) the market value of our outstanding common stock at listing plus distributions paid prior to listing exceeds (ii) the sum of the total amount of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan) and the amount of cash that, if distributed to stockholders as of the date of listing, would have provided them an annual 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock through the date of listing. Actual amounts to be paid depend upon the market value of our outstanding stock at the time of listing, among other factors. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we did not pay any such distributions to our advisor.
Subordinated Distribution Upon Termination
Pursuant to the Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended, of our operating partnership, upon termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement, our advisor will also be entitled to a subordinated distribution in redemption of its limited partnership units from our operating partnership equal to 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which: (i) the appraised value of our assets on the termination date, less any indebtedness secured by such assets, plus total distributions paid through the termination date, exceeds (ii) the sum of the total amount of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase plan) and the total amount of cash equal to an annual 7.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on the gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock through the termination date. In addition, our advisor may elect to defer its right to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination until either a listing or other liquidity event, including a liquidation, sale of substantially all of our assets or merger in which our stockholders receive in exchange for their shares of our common stock, shares of a company that are traded on a national securities exchange.
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we did not have any liability related to the subordinated distribution upon termination.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Accounts Payable Due to Affiliates
The following amounts were outstanding to our affiliates as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
| | | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| Fee | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Asset and property management fees | | $ | 1,856,000 |
| | $ | 1,783,000 |
| | $ | 1,991,000 |
| | $ | 1,856,000 |
|
| Construction management fees | | | 175,000 |
| | 58,000 |
|
| Lease commissions | | 94,000 |
| | 31,000 |
| | 143,000 |
| | 94,000 |
|
| Operating expenses | | | 12,000 |
| | 12,000 |
|
| Acquisition fees | | | — |
| | 15,000 |
|
| Development fees | | 68,000 |
| | 104,000 |
| | — |
| | 68,000 |
|
| Construction management fees | | 58,000 |
| | 14,000 |
| |
| Acquisition fees | | 15,000 |
| | 115,000 |
| |
| Operating expenses | | 12,000 |
| | 10,000 |
| |
| | | $ | 2,103,000 |
|
| $ | 2,057,000 |
| | $ | 2,321,000 |
|
| $ | 2,103,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
15. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Total |
| Assets: | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instrument | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total assets at fair value | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instruments | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,971,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,971,000 |
|
| Warrants | — |
| | — |
| | 1,178,000 |
| | 1,178,000 |
|
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,971,000 |
| | $ | 1,178,000 |
| | $ | 5,149,000 |
|
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.fall:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Total |
| Assets: | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instruments | $ | — |
| | $ | 417,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 417,000 |
|
| Total assets at fair value | $ | — |
| | $ | 417,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 417,000 |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration obligations | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 681,000 |
| | $ | 681,000 |
|
| Warrants | — |
| | — |
| | 1,207,000 |
| | 1,207,000 |
|
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,888,000 |
| | $ | 1,888,000 |
|
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
| | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Total |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative financial instruments | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,366,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,366,000 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 417,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 417,000 |
|
| Total assets at fair value | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,366,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,366,000 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 417,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 417,000 |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration obligations | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,107,000 |
| | $ | 5,107,000 |
| |
| Contingent consideration obligation | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 681,000 |
| | $ | 681,000 |
|
| Warrants | — |
| | — |
| | 1,155,000 |
| | 1,155,000 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 1,207,000 |
| | 1,207,000 |
|
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6,262,000 |
| | $ | 6,262,000 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,888,000 |
| | $ | 1,888,000 |
|
There were no transfers into and out of fair value measurement levels during the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2018.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We use interest rate swaps and interest rate caps to manage interest rate risk associated with variable-rate debt. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, as well as option volatility. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined by netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves.
To comply with the provisions of ASC Topic 820, weWe incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivative financial instruments fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with these instruments utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparty. However, as of December 31, 2018,2019, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Contingent Consideration LiabilitiesLiability
Contingent consideration obligations are due upon certain criteria being met within specified time frames. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recorded a net gain on the change in fair value of contingent consideration obligations of $681,000, $2,843,000 and $3,885,000, respectively, which is included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). As of December 31, 2018, and 2017, we havehad accrued $681,000 and $5,107,000, respectively, of a contingent consideration obligationsobligation in connection with our acquisitions of senior housing facilitiesClemmons facility within North Carolina ALF Portfolio. Such obligations areobligation was included in security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and were to bewould have been paid upon various conditions being met, including our tenants achieving certain operating performance metrics. In particular, the amounts were to bemay have been paid based upon the computation in the lease agreement, as amended, and receipt of notification within threefour years after the applicable acquisition date that the tenant has increased its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and rent cost, or EBITDAR, as defined in the lease agreement, for the preceding three months. There was no minimum required payment but the total maximum was capped at $20,318,000$11,000,000 and also limited by the tenant’s ability to increase its EBITDAR. Any payment made resultswould have resulted in an increase in the monthly rent charged to the tenant and additional rental revenue to us. Upon the tenant meeting certain conditions under the lease agreement and providing us notice in November 2018, we paid $1,583,000 towards this obligation related to the Moorseville facility in December 2018. The contingent consideration obligation related to the Clemmons facility continues to be revised to its estimated fair value each reporting period,was not exercised and expired June 28, 2019, and as such, as of December 31, 2018, we estimate that we will pay theno contingent consideration of $681,000amounts were due for this facility within North Carolina ALF Portfolio. Accordingly, for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we realized a net gain to earnings of $(2,843,000) and $(3,835,000), respectively, for these adjustments to contingent consideration obligations related to North Carolina ALF Portfolio. Effective January 2018, the lease agreement was amended to extend the contingent consideration payout period to four years from the original three years for the Clemmons facility with other terms of the amendment remaining consistent with the original lease agreement, as discussed above, with a remaining total maximum payment for the Clemmons facility capped at $11,000,000.
The fair value of the contingent consideration is determined based on the facts and circumstances existing at each reporting date and the likelihood of the counterparty achieving the necessary conditions based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow analysis based, in part, on significant inputs which are not observable in the market. As a result, we have determined that our contingent consideration valuations are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Any changes in the fair value of our contingent consideration subsequent to their acquisition date valuations are charged to earnings. Gains and losses recognized on contingent consideration assets and liabilities are included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
As of December 31, 2018, the unobservable inputs used for the contingent consideration valuations related to the Clemmons facility within North Carolina ALF Portfolio included the tenant’s annualized EBITDAR of $1,412,000 and a discount rate per annum of 1.25%. As of December 31, 2017, the unobservable inputs used for the contingent consideration valuations related to the Mooresville facility and Clemmons facility within North Carolina ALF Portfolio included the tenant’s annualized EBITDAR of $1,634,000 and $1,416,000, respectively, and a discount rate per annum of 1.25%. As of
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2016, the unobservable inputs used for the contingent consideration valuations related to the Mooresville facility and Clemmons facility within North Carolina ALF Portfolio included the tenant’s annualized EBITDAR of $1,599,000 and $1,753,000, respectively, and a discount rate per annum of 1.20%. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we also used as inputs for such valuations an Applicable Rate of 7.2%, as defined in the respective lease agreements, and assumed the tenants of the two facilities would request for 100% of the eligible payments in January 2019 and June 2019, respectively. Significant increases or decreases in any of the unobservable inputs in isolation or in the aggregate would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement to the contingent consideration obligations as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.2019.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our contingent consideration obligations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016:2017: | | | | | Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Contingent Consideration Obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 5,107,000 |
| | $ | 8,992,000 |
| | $ | 5,912,000 |
| | $ | 681,000 |
| | $ | 5,107,000 |
| | $ | 8,992,000 |
|
| Realized/unrealized (gains) losses recognized in earnings | | (2,843,000 | ) | | (3,885,000 | ) | | 13,430,000 |
| |
| Realized/unrealized gains recognized in earnings | | | (681,000 | ) | | (2,843,000 | ) | | (3,885,000 | ) |
| Settlements of obligations | | (1,583,000 | ) | | — |
| | (10,350,000 | ) | | — |
| | (1,583,000 | ) | | — |
|
| Ending balance | | $ | 681,000 |
| | $ | 5,107,000 |
| | $ | 8,992,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 681,000 |
| | $ | 5,107,000 |
|
| Amount of total (gains) losses included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized (gains) losses related to obligations still held | | $ | (2,843,000 | ) | | $ | (3,885,000 | ) | | $ | 13,430,000 |
| |
| Amount of total gains included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains related to obligations still held | | | $ | (681,000 | ) | | $ | (2,843,000 | ) | | $ | (3,885,000 | ) |
Warrants
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we have recorded $1,207,000$1,178,000 and $1,155,000,$1,207,000, respectively, related to warrants in Trilogy common units held by certain members of Trilogy’s pre-closing management, which is included in security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Once exercised, these warrants have redemption features similar to the common units held by members of Trilogy’s pre-closing management. See Note 12, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests, for a further discussion. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Real Estate Investment
For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 we determined that one of our medical office buildings was impaired based upon discounted cash flow analyses where the most significant inputs were market rent, capitalization rate and discount rate. We considered these inputs as Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. The following table is a summary of the quantitative information related to the non-recurring fair value measurement for the impairment of our real estate investment as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
| | | | | |
| | Range of Inputs or Inputs |
| | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Unobservable Inputs | | | |
| Market rent per square foot | $13.75 to $25.00 |
| | $19.00 to $25.53 |
|
| Capitalization rate | 7.50 | % | | 7.25 | % |
| Discount rate | 8.00 | % | | 8.00 | % |
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of one of our investments in unconsolidated entities was based on an income approach utilizing a discounted cash flows valuation model, and inputs were considered to be Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. Inputs to this valuation model included earnings multiples, discount rate, growth rates of revenue, operating expenses and cost of capital, some of which influence our expectation of future cash flows from our equity investments in the unconsolidated entities and, accordingly, the fair value of our investments.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following is a summary of the quantitative information related to this non-recurring fair value measurement for the impairment of our investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2016 using a discounted cash flows valuation model: |
| | |
Unobservable Inputs | | Ranges |
Terminal EBITDA(1) multiple | | 8.0X-9.0X |
Weighted average cost of capital | | 7.75%-9.75% |
Operating expenses as a percent of revenue | | 74%-84% |
Annual revenue growth | | 2.75%-3.65% |
___________
| |
(1) | Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization. |
Financial Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value
ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the balance sheet. Fair value is defined under ASC Topic 820.
Our accompanying consolidated balance sheets include the following financial instruments: real estate notes receivable, debt security investment, cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, restricted cash, real estate deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, accounts payable due to affiliates, mortgage loans payable and borrowings under our lines of credit and term loans.
We consider the carrying values of real estate notes receivable, cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, restricted cash, real estate deposits and accounts payable and accrued liabilities to approximate the fair value for these financial instruments based upon an evaluation of the underlying characteristics, market data and because of the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected realization. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents is classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of accounts payable due to affiliates is not determinable due to the related party nature of the accounts payable. The fair values of the other financial instruments are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of our real estate notes receivable and debt security investment areis estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates available to us for investments with similar terms and maturities. The fair value of our mortgage loans payable and our lines of credit and term loans are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis using borrowing rates available to us for debt instruments with similar terms and maturities. We have determined that the valuations of our real estate notes receivable, debt security investment, mortgage loans payable and lines of credit and term loans are classified in Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of such financial instruments as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 were as follows:
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | Carrying
Amount | | Fair
Value | | Carrying
Amount | | Fair
Value | Carrying
Amount(1) | | Fair
Value | | Carrying
Amount(1) | | Fair
Value |
| Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Real estate notes receivable | $ | 28,782,000 |
| | $ | 28,782,000 |
| | $ | 30,713,000 |
| | $ | 31,414,000 |
| |
| Debt security investment | $ | 69,873,000 |
| | $ | 94,116,000 |
| | $ | 67,275,000 |
| | $ | 94,202,000 |
| $ | 72,717,000 |
| | $ | 94,026,000 |
| | $ | 69,873,000 |
| | $ | 94,116,000 |
|
| Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage loans payable | $ | 688,262,000 |
| | $ | 618,886,000 |
| | $ | 613,558,000 |
| | $ | 570,918,000 |
| $ | 792,870,000 |
| | $ | 732,846,000 |
| | $ | 688,262,000 |
| | $ | 618,886,000 |
|
| Lines of credit and term loans | $ | 735,737,000 |
| | $ | 737,982,000 |
| | $ | 617,798,000 |
| | $ | 624,102,000 |
| $ | 807,742,000 |
| | $ | 816,355,000 |
| | $ | 735,737,000 |
| | $ | 737,982,000 |
|
| |
| (1) | Carrying amount is net of any discount/premium and unamortized costs. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
16. Income Taxes and Distributions
As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders. We have elected to treat certain of our consolidated subsidiaries as TRSs pursuant to the Code. TRSs may participate in services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs and are subject to federal and state income tax at regular corporate tax rates.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
On December 22, 2017, the U.S.United States government enacted comprehensive tax legislation pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Tax Act. The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S.United States tax code, including, but not limited to, reducing the U.S.United States federal corporate tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0%, eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax and changing rules related to uses and limitations of net operating loss carryforwards created in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. As a result, income tax expense reported for the year ended December 31, 2017 was adjusted to reflect the effects of the Tax Act, which resulted in an income tax benefit of $2,997,000 and is primarily due to the application of the newly enacted rates to the existing deferred tax assets/liabilities of our TRSs.
We adopted ASU 2018-05 which allows us to record provisional amounts during the period of enactment. Any change to the provisional amounts would have been recorded as an adjustment to the provision for income taxes in the period the amounts are determined. The measurement period ends when we have obtained, prepared and analyzed the information necessary to finalize the provision, but cannot extend beyond one year of the enactment date. As of December 31, 2018, the measurement period has closed, and there were no material changes to the provision for income taxes. The Tax Act is still unclear in some respects and could be subject to potential amendments and technical corrections. The federal income tax rules dealing with U.S.United States federal income taxation and REITs are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process, the IRS and the U.S.United States Treasury Department, which results in statutory changes as well as frequent revisions to regulations and interpretations. As a result, the long-term impact of the Tax Act on the overall economy, government revenues, our tenants, us, and the real estate industry cannot be reliably predicted at this time. We continue to work with our tax advisors to determine the full impact that the recent tax legislation as a whole will have on us.
The components of income (loss) before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, were as follows: | | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Domestic | $ | 14,202,000 |
| | $ | 2,931,000 |
| | $ | (202,886,000 | ) | $ | 1,193,000 |
| | $ | 14,202,000 |
| | $ | 2,931,000 |
|
| Foreign | (462,000 | ) | | (808,000 | ) | | (667,000 | ) | (521,000 | ) | | (462,000 | ) | | (808,000 | ) |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 13,740,000 |
| | $ | 2,123,000 |
| | $ | (203,553,000 | ) | |
| Income before income taxes | | $ | 672,000 |
| | $ | 13,740,000 |
| | $ | 2,123,000 |
|
The components of income tax (benefit) expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017 were as follows: | | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Federal deferred | $ | (4,647,000 | ) | | $ | (3,382,000 | ) | | $ | (6,656,000 | ) | $ | (3,672,000 | ) | | $ | (4,647,000 | ) | | $ | (3,382,000 | ) |
| State deferred | (922,000 | ) | | (755,000 | ) | | (1,502,000 | ) | (737,000 | ) | | (922,000 | ) | | (755,000 | ) |
| Foreign deferred | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Federal current | — |
| | — |
| | (3,000 | ) | (29,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| State current | | (16,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Foreign current | 988,000 |
| | 543,000 |
| | 160,000 |
| 605,000 |
| | 988,000 |
| | 543,000 |
|
| Valuation allowances | 3,784,000 |
| | 367,000 |
| | 8,344,000 |
| 5,373,000 |
| | 3,784,000 |
| | 367,000 |
|
| Total income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (797,000 | ) | | $ | (3,227,000 | ) | | $ | 343,000 |
| |
| Total income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | 1,524,000 |
| | $ | (797,000 | ) | | $ | (3,227,000 | ) |
Current Income Tax
Federal and state income taxes are generally a function of the level of income recognized by our TRSs. Foreign income taxes are generally a function of our income on our real estate and real estate-related investments located in the UK and Isle of Man.
Deferred Taxes
Deferred income tax is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences (primarily basis differences between tax and financial reporting for real estate assets and equity investments) and generation of tax net operating losses that may be realized in future periods depending on sufficient taxable income.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We apply the rules under ASC 740-10, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, for uncertain tax positions using a “more likely than not” recognition threshold for tax positions. Pursuant to these rules, we will initially recognize the financial statement effects of aan uncertain tax position when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits of the tax position, that such a position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authorities. If the tax benefit meets the “more likely than not” threshold, the measurement of the tax benefit will be based on our estimate of the ultimate tax benefit to be sustained if audited by the taxing authority. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,December 31, 2018, we did not have any tax benefits or liabilities for uncertain tax positions that we believe should be recognized in our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
We assess the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is established if we believe it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets are not realizable. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, our valuation allowance substantially reserves the net deferred tax assets due to inherent uncertainty of future income. We will continue to monitor industry and economic conditions, and our ability to generate taxable income based on our business plan and available tax planning strategies, which would allow us to utilize the tax benefits of the net deferred tax assets and thereby allow us to reverse all, or a portion of, our valuation allowance in the future.
Any increases or decreases to the deferred income tax assets or liabilities are reflected in income tax benefit (expense) in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 were as follows: | | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Deferred income tax assets: | | | | | | |
| Fixed assets & intangibles | $ | 7,292,000 |
| | $ | 8,189,000 |
| $ | 6,509,000 |
| | $ | 7,292,000 |
|
| Expense accruals & other | 10,686,000 |
| | 6,956,000 |
| 14,233,000 |
| | 10,686,000 |
|
| Net operating loss | 8,980,000 |
| | 6,338,000 |
| 14,341,000 |
| | 8,980,000 |
|
| Reserves and accruals | 4,095,000 |
| | 2,466,000 |
| 5,540,000 |
| | 4,095,000 |
|
| Allowances for accounts receivable | 581,000 |
| | 1,766,000 |
| (179,000 | ) | | 581,000 |
|
| Investment in joint ventures | 1,909,000 |
| | 1,465,000 |
| |
| Investments in joint ventures | | 2,326,000 |
| | 1,909,000 |
|
| Valuation allowances | (24,082,000 | ) | | (20,298,000 | ) | (29,456,000 | ) | | (24,082,000 | ) |
| Total deferred income tax assets | $ | 9,461,000 |
| | $ | 6,882,000 |
| $ | 13,314,000 |
| | $ | 9,461,000 |
|
| Deferred income tax liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Fixed assets and intangibles | $ | (8,924,000 | ) | | $ | (8,413,000 | ) | $ | (14,468,000 | ) | | $ | (8,924,000 | ) |
| Other — temporary differences | (2,903,000 | ) | | (2,689,000 | ) | (2,176,000 | ) | | (2,903,000 | ) |
| Total deferred income tax liabilities | $ | (11,827,000 | ) | | $ | (11,102,000 | ) | $ | (16,644,000 | ) | | $ | (11,827,000 | ) |
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had a net operatingoperation loss, or NOL, carryforward of $58,416,000 and $34,656,000, respectively, related to the TRSs. These amounts can be used to offset future taxable income, if any. The NOL carryforwards that were incurred before January 1, 2018 begin to expire in 2035 with respect to the TRSs. The NOL carryforwards incurred after December 31, 2017 will be carried forward indefinitely.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Tax Treatment of Distributions
For federal income tax purposes, distributions to stockholders are characterized as ordinary income, capital gain distributions or nontaxable distributions. Nontaxable distributions will reduce U.S.United States stockholders’ basis (but not below zero) in their shares. The income tax treatment for distributions reportable for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017 was as follows:
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Ordinary income | $ | 33,141,000 |
| | 27.6 | % | | $ | 40,475,000 |
| | 34.1 | % | | $ | 28,135,000 |
| | 24.2 | % | $ | 35,294,000 |
| | 29.9 | % | | $ | 33,141,000 |
| | 27.6 | % | | $ | 40,475,000 |
| | 34.1 | % |
| Capital gain | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Return of capital | 86,833,000 |
| | 72.4 |
| | 78,285,000 |
| | 65.9 |
| | 88,140,000 |
| | 75.8 |
| 82,731,000 |
| | 70.1 |
| | 86,833,000 |
| | 72.4 |
| | 78,285,000 |
| | 65.9 |
|
| | $ | 119,974,000 |
|
| 100 | % |
| $ | 118,760,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 116,275,000 |
| | 100 | % | $ | 118,025,000 |
|
| 100 | % |
| $ | 119,974,000 |
| | 100 | % | | $ | 118,760,000 |
| | 100 | % |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Amounts listed above do not include distributions paid on nonvested shares of our restricted common stock which have been separately reported.
17. Future Minimum RentLeases
Rental IncomeLessor
We have operating leases with tenants that expire at various dates through 20592059. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized $118,201,000 of revenues related to operating lease payments, of which $18,942,000 was for variable lease payments. As of December 31, 2019, the following table sets forth the undiscounted cash flows for future minimum base rents due under operating leases for leases in effect for properties we wholly own for each of the next five years ending December 31 and in some cases are subject to scheduled fixed increases or adjustments based on a consumer price index. Generally, our leases grant tenants renewal options. Our leases also generally provide for additional rents based on certain operating expenses. thereafter:
|
| | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2020 | | $ | 86,817,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 84,786,000 |
|
| 2022 | | 78,164,000 |
|
| 2023 | | 70,582,000 |
|
| 2024 | | 64,805,000 |
|
| Thereafter | | 444,839,000 |
|
| Total | | $ | 829,993,000 |
|
Future minimum base rent contractually due under operating leases, excluding tenant reimbursements of certain costs, as of December 31, 2018 for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter was as follows:
| | | Year | | Amount | | Amount |
| 2019 | | $ | 92,888,000 |
| | $ | 92,888,000 |
|
| 2020 | | 88,536,000 |
| | 88,536,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 86,362,000 |
| | 86,362,000 |
|
| 2022 | | 80,233,000 |
| | 80,233,000 |
|
| 2023 | | 72,535,000 |
| | 72,535,000 |
|
| Thereafter | | 559,649,000 |
| | 559,649,000 |
|
| | | $ | 980,203,000 |
| |
| Total | | | $ | 980,203,000 |
|
Rental ExpenseLessee
We lease certain land, buildings, furniture, fixtures, campus equipment, office equipment and automobiles. We have groundlease agreements with lease and other lease obligationsnon-lease components, which are generally accounted for separately. Most leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that generally require fixed annual rental payments and may also include escalation clauses and renewal options. These leases expirecan extend at various dates through 2112, excluding extension options. FutureThe exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. Certain leases also include options to purchase the leased property.
As of December 31, 2019, we had future lease payments of $28,703,000 for operating leases that had not yet commenced. These operating leases will commence between fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2021 with lease terms of up to 10 years.
The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term, unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise. Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments that are adjusted periodically based on Consumer Price Index, and may also include other variable lease costs (i.e., common area maintenance, property taxes and insurance). Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The components of lease costs were as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| Lease Cost | | Classification | | Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| Operating lease cost(1) | | Property operating expenses and rental expenses | | $ | 29,974,000 |
|
| Finance lease cost | | | | |
| Amortization of leased assets | | Depreciation and amortization | | 2,001,000 |
|
| Accretion of lease liabilities | | Interest expense | | 391,000 |
|
| Total lease cost | | | | $ | 32,366,000 |
|
| |
| (1) | Includes short-term leases and variable lease costs, which are immaterial. |
Other information related to leases was as follows:
|
| | | | |
| Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flows Information | | Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | | |
| Operating cash outflows related to operating leases | | $ | 22,114,000 |
|
| Operating cash outflows related to finance leases | | $ | 390,000 |
|
| Financing cash outflows related to finance leases | | $ | 3,076,000 |
|
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities | | $ | 31,958,000 |
|
|
| | | |
| Lease Term and Discount Rate | | December 31, 2019 |
| Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) | | |
| Operating leases | | 13.5 |
|
| Finance leases | | 1.3 |
|
| Weighted average discount rate | | |
| Operating leases | | 5.94 | % |
| Finance leases | | 7.33 | % |
Operating Leases
As of December 31, 2019, the following table sets forth the undiscounted cash flows of our scheduled obligations for future minimum payments for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, as well as the reconciliation of those cash flows to operating lease liabilities: |
| | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2020 | | $ | 24,571,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 24,993,000 |
|
| 2022 | | 25,406,000 |
|
| 2023 | | 24,732,000 |
|
| 2024 | | 25,150,000 |
|
| Thereafter | | 187,534,000 |
|
| Total operating lease payments | | 312,386,000 |
|
| Less: interest | | 105,015,000 |
|
| Present value of operating lease liabilities | | $ | 207,371,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As of December 31, 2018, future minimum lease obligations under non-cancelable ground and other lease obligations as of December 31, 2018 for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter was as follows:
| | | Year | | Amount | | Amount |
| 2019 | | $ | 22,194,000 |
| | $ | 22,194,000 |
|
| 2020 | | 22,564,000 |
| | 22,564,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 23,166,000 |
| | 23,166,000 |
|
| 2022 | | 23,702,000 |
| | 23,702,000 |
|
| 2023 | | 23,154,000 |
| | 23,154,000 |
|
| Thereafter | | 177,927,000 |
| | 177,927,000 |
|
| | | $ | 292,707,000 |
| |
| Total | | | $ | 292,707,000 |
|
Finance Leases
As of December 31, 2019, the following table sets forth the undiscounted cash flows of our scheduled obligations for future minimum payments for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter, as well as a reconciliation of those cash flows to finance lease liabilities:
|
| | | | |
| Year | | Amount |
| 2020 | | $ | 1,217,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 129,000 |
|
| 2022 | | — |
|
| 2023 | | — |
|
| 2024 | | — |
|
| Thereafter | | — |
|
| Total finance lease payments | | 1,346,000 |
|
| Less: interest | | 44,000 |
|
| Present value of finance lease liabilities | | $ | 1,302,000 |
|
As of December 31, 2018, future minimum lease payments under finance leases and for each of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter was as follows:
|
| | | | |
| Year | | Amount(1) |
| 2019 | | $ | 3,307,000 |
|
| 2020 | | 1,266,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 130,000 |
|
| 2022 | | — |
|
| 2023 | | — |
|
| Thereafter | | — |
|
| | | $ | 4,703,000 |
|
___________
| |
| (1) | Amounts above represent principal of $4,438,000 and interest obligations of $265,000 under finance leases. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We evaluate our leases for operating versus capital lease treatment in accordance with ASC Topic 840. A lease is classified as a capital lease if it provides for transfer of ownership of the leased asset at the end of the lease term, contains a bargain purchase option, has a lease term greater than 75% of the economic life of the leased asset or if the net present value of the future minimum lease payments are in excess of 90% of the fair value of the leased asset. Future minimum lease payments under financing, capital lease and other obligations as of December 31, 2018 for each of the next five years ending December 31 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year | | Capital Leases | | Financing Obligations | | Other Obligations | | Amount(1) |
| 2019 | | $ | 3,307,000 |
| | $ | 4,272,000 |
| | $ | 1,049,000 |
| | $ | 8,628,000 |
|
| 2020 | | 1,266,000 |
| | 10,906,000 |
| | — |
| | 12,172,000 |
|
| 2021 | | 130,000 |
| | 5,586,000 |
| | — |
| | 5,716,000 |
|
| 2022 | | — |
| | 1,545,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,545,000 |
|
| 2023 | | — |
| | 462,000 |
| | — |
| | 462,000 |
|
| | | $ | 4,703,000 |
|
| $ | 22,771,000 |
|
| $ | 1,049,000 |
| | $ | 28,523,000 |
|
___________
| |
(1) | Amounts above represent principal of $26,947,000 and interest obligations of $1,576,000 under financing, capital lease and other arrangements. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we have not recorded any purchase option liabilities. When such liabilities are recorded, amounts are included in financing and capital lease obligations in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are excluded from amounts above. Purchase option liabilities are recorded at their estimated fair value by discounting the difference between the applicable property’s acquisition date fair value and an estimate of its future option price. |
18. Business Combinations
2018 Business Combination
For the yearyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 none of our property acquisitions were accounted for as business combinations. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, for a discussion of our 2018 property acquisitions accounted for as asset acquisitions.
2017 Business Combination
For the year ended December 31,and 2017, none of our property acquisitions were accounted for as business combinations. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, for a discussion of our 2017 property acquisitions accounted for as asset acquisitions.acquisitions for such periods. On September 26, 2017, we, through a majority-owned subsidiary of Trilogy, acquired a pharmaceutical business in Nashville, Tennessee from an unaffiliated third party for a contract purchase price of $7,500,000, plus closing costs and an acquisition fee paid to our advisor, which are included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). The acquisition of such pharmaceutical business is included in our integrated senior health campuses segment and was accounted for as a business combination. Based on quantitative and qualitative considerations, such business combination we completed during 2017 was not material.
2016 Business Combinations
For the year ended December 31, 2016, using cash on hand and debt financing, we completed 12 property acquisitions comprising 23 buildings and acquired the real estate underlying 17 previously leased integrated senior health campuses, which have been accounted for as business combinations. The aggregate contract purchase price for these property acquisitions was $498,656,000, plus closing costs and acquisition fees of $14,559,000, which are included in acquisition related expenses in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, Net, for a listing of the properties acquired, acquisition dates and the amount of financing initially incurred or assumed in connection with such acquisitions.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Results of operations for the property acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2016 are reflected in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the period from the date of acquisition of each property through December 31, 2016. For the period from the acquisition date through December 31, 2016, we recognized the following amounts of revenue and net income for the 2016 property acquisitions: |
| | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition | | Revenue | | Net Income |
| 2016 Acquisitions | | $ | 20,228,000 |
| | $ | 1,021,000 |
|
The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of our 2016 property acquisitions:
|
| | | |
| | 2016 Acquisitions |
| Building and improvements | $ | 439,067,000 |
|
| Land | 44,738,000 |
|
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 644,000 |
|
| In-place leases | 48,827,000 |
|
| Above-market leases | 1,385,000 |
|
| Certificates of need | 18,410,000 |
|
| Purchase option assets | (56,792,000 | ) |
| Total assets acquired | 496,279,000 |
|
| Mortgage loans payable, net | (14,066,000 | ) |
| Below-market leases | (1,842,000 | ) |
| Total liabilities assumed | (15,908,000 | ) |
| Net assets acquired | $ | 480,371,000 |
|
Assuming the property acquisitions in 2016 discussed above had occurred on January 1, 2015, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, unaudited pro forma revenue, net loss, net loss attributable to controlling interest and net loss per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted would have been as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Revenue | $ | 1,001,599,000 |
| | $ | 193,796,000 |
|
| Net loss | $ | (170,845,000 | ) | | $ | (154,270,000 | ) |
| Net loss attributable to controlling interest | $ | (113,592,000 | ) | | $ | (133,299,000 | ) |
Net loss per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | (0.58 | ) | | $ | (0.73 | ) |
The unaudited pro forma adjustments assume that the initial offering proceeds, at a price of $10.00 per share, net of offering costs, were raised as of January 1, 2015. In addition, acquisition related expenses associated with the acquisitions have been excluded from the pro forma results in 2016 and included in the 2015 pro forma results. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have been obtained had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.
19. Segment Reporting
As of December 31, 2018,2019, we evaluated our business and made resource allocations based on six reportable business segments: medical office buildings, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, senior housing, senior housing — RIDEA and integrated senior health campuses. Our medical office buildings are typically leased to multiple tenants under separate leases, in each building, thus requiring active management and responsibility for many of the associated operating expenses (although many(much of thesewhich are, or can effectively be, passed through to the tenants). In addition, our medical office buildings segment includesincluded the Mezzanine Fixed Rate Notes. Our hospital investments are primarily single-tenant properties that lease the facilities to unaffiliated tenants under triple-net and generally master leases that transfer the obligation for all facility operating costs (including maintenance,
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures) to the tenant. Our skilled nursing facilities and senior housing facilities are similarly structured as our hospital investments. In addition, our senior housing segment includes our debt security investment and Crown Senior Care Facility, a facility agreement we entered into with Caring Homes (TFP) Group Limited, or the CHG Borrower, an unaffiliated third party, on September 16, 2015, which was collateralized by three senior housing facilities in the UK and the income from the CHG Borrower’s operations and which was settled in full on November 15, 2016.investment. Our senior housing — RIDEA properties include senior housing facilities that are owned and operated utilizing a RIDEA structure. Our integrated senior health campuses include a range of assisted living, memory care, independent living, skilled nursing services and certain ancillary businesses that are owned and operated utilizing a RIDEA structure.
We evaluate performance based upon segment net operating income. We define segment net operating income as total revenues, less property operating expenses and rental expenses, which excludes depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, acquisition related expenses, interest expense, gain (loss)or loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments, gain or loss on disposition of real estate investments, impairment of real estate investments, foreign currency gain (loss),or loss, other income, (expense), loss from unconsolidated entities and income tax benefit (expense)or expense for each segment. We believe that net income (loss), as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measurement. However, we believe that segment net operating income serves as an appropriate supplemental performance measure to net income (loss) because it allows investors and our management to measure unlevered property-level operating results and to compare our operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies and between periods on a consistent basis.
Interest expense, depreciation and amortization and other expenses not attributable to individual properties are not allocated to individual segments for purposes of assessing segment performance. Non-segment assets primarily consist of corporate assets including cash and cash equivalents, other receivables, deferred financing costs interest rate swap assets and other assets not attributable to individual properties.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Summary information for the reportable segments during the years ended December 31, 20182019, 20172018 and 20162017 was as follows:
| | | | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | Medical Office Buildings | | Senior Housing | | Skilled Nursing Facilities | | Hospitals | | Year Ended December 31, 2018 | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | Medical Office Buildings | | Senior Housing | | Skilled Nursing Facilities | | Hospitals | | Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Resident fees and services | | $ | 940,616,000 |
| | $ | 65,075,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,005,691,000 |
| | $ | 1,030,934,000 |
| | $ | 68,144,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,099,078,000 |
|
| Real estate revenue | | — |
| | — |
| | 80,078,000 |
| | 21,913,000 |
| | 14,887,000 |
| | 12,691,000 |
| | 129,569,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 80,805,000 |
| | 18,407,000 |
| | 13,345,000 |
| | 11,481,000 |
| | 124,038,000 |
|
| Total revenues | | 940,616,000 |
| | 65,075,000 |
| | 80,078,000 |
|
| 21,913,000 |
| | 14,887,000 |
| | 12,691,000 |
| | 1,135,260,000 |
| | 1,030,934,000 |
| | 68,144,000 |
| | 80,805,000 |
|
| 18,407,000 |
| | 13,345,000 |
| | 11,481,000 |
| | 1,223,116,000 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property operating expenses | | 844,279,000 |
| | 44,792,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 889,071,000 |
| | 919,793,000 |
| | 48,067,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 967,860,000 |
|
| Rental expenses | | — |
| | — |
| | 30,514,000 |
| | 837,000 |
| | 1,816,000 |
| | 1,656,000 |
| | 34,823,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30,870,000 |
| | 1,001,000 |
| | 1,456,000 |
| | 532,000 |
| | 33,859,000 |
|
| Segment net operating income | | $ | 96,337,000 |
| | $ | 20,283,000 |
| | $ | 49,564,000 |
|
| $ | 21,076,000 |
| | $ | 13,071,000 |
|
| $ | 11,035,000 |
| | $ | 211,366,000 |
| | $ | 111,141,000 |
| | $ | 20,077,000 |
| | $ | 49,935,000 |
|
| $ | 17,406,000 |
| | $ | 11,889,000 |
|
| $ | 10,949,000 |
| | $ | 221,397,000 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | General and administrative | | | | | | | | $ | 28,770,000 |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | $ | 29,749,000 |
|
| Acquisition related expenses | Acquisition related expenses | | | | | | | | (2,913,000 | ) | Acquisition related expenses | | | | | | | | (161,000 | ) |
| Depreciation and amortization | Depreciation and amortization | | | | 95,678,000 |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | 111,412,000 |
|
| Other income (expense): | Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense: | Interest expense: | | | Interest expense: | | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount/premium) | | (66,281,000 | ) | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishment) | | Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishment) | | (78,553,000 | ) |
| Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | | (1,949,000 | ) | Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | | (4,541,000 | ) |
| Impairment of real estate investments | | (2,542,000 | ) | |
| Loss from unconsolidated entities | Loss from unconsolidated entities | | (3,877,000 | ) | Loss from unconsolidated entities | | (2,097,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency loss | | (2,690,000 | ) | |
| Foreign currency gain | | Foreign currency gain | | 1,730,000 |
|
| Other income | Other income | | | | | | | | 1,248,000 |
| Other income | | | | | | | | 3,736,000 |
|
| Income before income taxes | Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | 13,740,000 |
| Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | 672,000 |
|
| Income tax benefit | | | | | | | | 797,000 |
| |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 14,537,000 |
| |
| Income tax expense | | Income tax expense | | | | | | | | (1,524,000 | ) |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (852,000 | ) |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| | | | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | Medical Office Buildings | | Senior Housing | | Skilled Nursing Facilities | | Hospitals | | Year Ended December 31, 2017 | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | Medical Office Buildings | | Senior Housing | | Skilled Nursing Facilities | | Hospitals | | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Resident fees and services | | $ | 863,029,000 |
| | $ | 64,192,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 927,221,000 |
| | $ | 940,616,000 |
| | $ | 65,075,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,005,691,000 |
|
| Real estate revenue | | — |
| | — |
| | 78,584,000 |
| | 20,898,000 |
| | 14,884,000 |
| | 12,705,000 |
| | 127,071,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 80,078,000 |
| | 21,913,000 |
| | 14,887,000 |
| | 12,691,000 |
| | 129,569,000 |
|
| Total revenues | | 863,029,000 |
| | 64,192,000 |
|
| 78,584,000 |
|
| 20,898,000 |
| | 14,884,000 |
| | 12,705,000 |
| | 1,054,292,000 |
| | 940,616,000 |
| | 65,075,000 |
|
| 80,078,000 |
|
| 21,913,000 |
| | 14,887,000 |
| | 12,691,000 |
| | 1,135,260,000 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property operating expenses | | 763,306,000 |
| | 43,133,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 806,439,000 |
| | 844,279,000 |
| | 44,792,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 889,071,000 |
|
| Rental expenses | | — |
| | — |
| | 29,344,000 |
| | 670,000 |
| | 1,608,000 |
| | 1,453,000 |
| | 33,075,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30,514,000 |
| | 837,000 |
| | 1,816,000 |
| | 1,656,000 |
| | 34,823,000 |
|
| Segment net operating income | | $ | 99,723,000 |
| | $ | 21,059,000 |
|
| $ | 49,240,000 |
|
| $ | 20,228,000 |
| | $ | 13,276,000 |
|
| $ | 11,252,000 |
|
| $ | 214,778,000 |
| | $ | 96,337,000 |
| | $ | 20,283,000 |
|
| $ | 49,564,000 |
|
| $ | 21,076,000 |
| | $ | 13,071,000 |
|
| $ | 11,035,000 |
|
| $ | 211,366,000 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | General and administrative | | | | | | | | $ | 32,587,000 |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | $ | 28,770,000 |
|
| Acquisition related expenses | Acquisition related expenses | | | | | | | | (3,833,000 | ) | Acquisition related expenses | | | | | | | | (2,913,000 | ) |
| Depreciation and amortization | Depreciation and amortization | | | | 113,226,000 |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | 95,678,000 |
|
| Other income (expense): | Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense: | Interest expense: | | Interest expense: | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishment) | (60,872,000 | ) | |
| Gain in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 383,000 |
| |
| Gain on dispositions of real estate investments | | | | | | | | 3,370,000 |
| |
| Impairment of real estate investments | | | | | | | | (14,070,000 | ) | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount/premium) | | Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount/premium) | (66,281,000 | ) |
| Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | | Loss in fair value of derivative financial instruments | (1,949,000 | ) |
| Impairment of real estate investment | | Impairment of real estate investment | | | | | | | | (2,542,000 | ) |
| Loss from unconsolidated entities | Loss from unconsolidated entities | | | | | | | | (5,048,000 | ) | Loss from unconsolidated entities | | | | | | | | (3,877,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency gain | | | | | | | | 4,045,000 |
| |
| Foreign currency loss | | Foreign currency loss | | | | | | | | (2,690,000 | ) |
| Other income | Other income | | | | | | | | 1,517,000 |
| Other income | | | | | | | | 1,248,000 |
|
| Income before income taxes | Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | 2,123,000 |
| Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | 13,740,000 |
|
| Income tax benefit | Income tax benefit | | | | | | | | 3,227,000 |
| Income tax benefit | | | | | | | | 797,000 |
|
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 5,350,000 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 14,537,000 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
| | | | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | Medical
Office
Buildings | | Senior
Housing | | Skilled Nursing Facilities | | Hospitals | | Year Ended December 31, 2016 | | Integrated Senior Health Campuses | | Senior Housing — RIDEA | | Medical
Office
Buildings | | Senior
Housing | | Skilled Nursing Facilities | | Hospitals | | Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Resident fees and services | | $ | 810,034,000 |
| | $ | 62,371,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 872,405,000 |
| | $ | 863,029,000 |
| | $ | 64,192,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 927,221,000 |
|
| Real estate revenue | | — |
| | — |
| | 73,252,000 |
| | 18,517,000 |
| | 8,686,000 |
| | 16,711,000 |
| | 117,166,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 78,584,000 |
| | 20,898,000 |
| | 14,884,000 |
| | 12,705,000 |
| | 127,071,000 |
|
| Total revenues | | 810,034,000 |
| | 62,371,000 |
| | 73,252,000 |
|
| 18,517,000 |
| | 8,686,000 |
| | 16,711,000 |
| | 989,571,000 |
| | 863,029,000 |
| | 64,192,000 |
| | 78,584,000 |
|
| 20,898,000 |
| | 14,884,000 |
| | 12,705,000 |
| | 1,054,292,000 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property operating expenses | | 722,793,000 |
| | 42,346,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 765,139,000 |
| | 763,306,000 |
| | 43,133,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 806,439,000 |
|
| Rental expenses | | — |
| | — |
| | 26,863,000 |
| | 538,000 |
| | 758,000 |
| | 1,235,000 |
| | 29,394,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29,344,000 |
| | 670,000 |
| | 1,608,000 |
| | 1,453,000 |
| | 33,075,000 |
|
| Segment net operating income | | $ | 87,241,000 |
| | $ | 20,025,000 |
| | $ | 46,389,000 |
|
| $ | 17,979,000 |
| | $ | 7,928,000 |
|
| $ | 15,476,000 |
|
| $ | 195,038,000 |
| | $ | 99,723,000 |
| | $ | 21,059,000 |
| | $ | 49,240,000 |
|
| $ | 20,228,000 |
| | $ | 13,276,000 |
|
| $ | 11,252,000 |
|
| $ | 214,778,000 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | General and administrative | | | | | | | | $ | 28,951,000 |
| General and administrative | | | | | | | | $ | 32,587,000 |
|
| Acquisition related expenses | Acquisition related expenses | | | | | | | | 28,589,000 |
| Acquisition related expenses | | | | | | | | (3,833,000 | ) |
| Depreciation and amortization | Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | 271,307,000 |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | 113,226,000 |
|
| Other income (expense): | Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | | Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense: | Interest expense: | | Interest expense: | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount/premium) | (45,665,000 | ) | |
| Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishment) | | Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs, debt discount/premium and loss on debt extinguishment) | (60,872,000 | ) |
| Gain in fair value of derivative financial instruments | Gain in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 1,968,000 |
| Gain in fair value of derivative financial instruments | 383,000 |
|
| Gain on dispositions of real estate investments | | Gain on dispositions of real estate investments | | | | | | | | 3,370,000 |
|
| Impairment of real estate investments | | Impairment of real estate investments | | | | | | | | (14,070,000 | ) |
| Loss from unconsolidated entities | Loss from unconsolidated entities | | | | | | | | (18,377,000 | ) | Loss from unconsolidated entities | | | | | | | | (5,048,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency loss | | | | | | | | (8,755,000 | ) | |
| Foreign currency gain | | Foreign currency gain | | | | | | | | 4,045,000 |
|
| Other income | Other income | | | | | | | | 1,085,000 |
| Other income | | | | | | | | 1,517,000 |
|
| Loss before income taxes | | | | | | | | (203,553,000 | ) | |
| Income tax expense | | | | | | | | (343,000 | ) | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (203,896,000 | ) | |
| Income before income taxes | | Income before income taxes | | | | | | | | 2,123,000 |
|
| Income tax benefit | | Income tax benefit | | | | | | | | 3,227,000 |
|
| Net Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 5,350,000 |
|
AssetsTotal assets by reportable segment as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 were as follows:
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Integrated senior health campuses | $ | 1,478,147,000 |
| | $ | 1,366,245,000 |
| $ | 1,791,868,000 |
| | $ | 1,478,147,000 |
|
| Medical office buildings | 646,784,000 |
| | 662,959,000 |
| 620,292,000 |
| | 646,784,000 |
|
| Senior housing — RIDEA | 271,381,000 |
| | 279,388,000 |
| 360,823,000 |
| | 271,381,000 |
|
| Senior housing | 242,686,000 |
| | 231,559,000 |
| 152,909,000 |
| | 242,686,000 |
|
| Skilled nursing facilities | 127,809,000 |
| | 129,359,000 |
| 126,606,000 |
| | 127,809,000 |
|
| Hospitals | 118,685,000 |
| | 123,431,000 |
| 113,737,000 |
| | 118,685,000 |
|
| Other | 3,600,000 |
| | 7,534,000 |
| 6,054,000 |
| | 3,600,000 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 2,889,092,000 |
| | $ | 2,800,475,000 |
| $ | 3,172,289,000 |
| | $ | 2,889,092,000 |
|
As of both December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, goodwill of $75,309,000 was allocated to integrated senior health campuses, and no other segments had goodwill.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Our portfolio of properties and other investments are located in the United States, Isle of Man and the UK. Revenues and assets are attributed to the country in which the property is physically located. The following is a summary of geographic information for our operations for the periods presented: | | | | | Years Ended December 31, | | Years Ended December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| United States | | $ | 1,130,350,000 |
| | $ | 1,049,586,000 |
| | $ | 985,069,000 |
| | $ | 1,218,337,000 |
| | $ | 1,130,350,000 |
| | $ | 1,049,586,000 |
|
| International | | 4,910,000 |
| | 4,706,000 |
| | 4,502,000 |
| | 4,779,000 |
| | 4,910,000 |
| | 4,706,000 |
|
| | | $ | 1,135,260,000 |
| | $ | 1,054,292,000 |
|
| $ | 989,571,000 |
| | $ | 1,223,116,000 |
| | $ | 1,135,260,000 |
|
| $ | 1,054,292,000 |
|
The following is a summary of real estate investments, net by geographic regions as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017:
| | | | December 31, | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Real estate investments, net: | | | | | | |
| United States | $ | 2,173,395,000 |
| | $ | 2,110,280,000 |
| $ | 2,219,882,000 |
| | $ | 2,173,395,000 |
|
| International | 49,286,000 |
| | 52,978,000 |
| 50,539,000 |
| | 49,286,000 |
|
| | $ | 2,222,681,000 |
| | $ | 2,163,258,000 |
| $ | 2,270,421,000 |
| | $ | 2,222,681,000 |
|
20. Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk are primarily real estate notes receivable and debt security investment,investments, cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, restricted cash and real estate deposits. We are exposed to credit risk with respect to the real estate notes receivable anda debt security investment, but we believe collection of the outstanding amount is probable. We believe that the risk is further mitigated as the real estate notes receivable are secured by property and there is a guarantee of completion agreement executed between the parent company of the borrowers and us. Cash and cash equivalents are generally invested in investment-grade, short-term instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. We have cash and cash equivalents in financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC. As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we had cash and cash equivalents in excess of FDIC insured limits. We believe this risk is not significant. Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable from tenants is limited. We perform credit evaluations of prospective tenants and security deposits are obtained at the time of property acquisition and upon lease execution.
Based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2018,2019, properties in one statetwo states in the United States accounted for 10.0% or more of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized net operating income. Properties located in Indiana and Ohio accounted for 34.5%37.8% and 10.8%, respectively, of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized net operating income. Accordingly, there is a geographic concentration of risk subject to fluctuations in sucheach state’s economy.
Based on leases in effect as of December 31, 2018,2019, our six reportable business segments, integrated senior health campuses, medical office buildings, senior housing — RIDEA, senior housing, skilled nursing facilities, hospitals and hospitalssenior housing accounted for 47.1%51.4%, 27.6%27.3%, 9.4%, 6.5%9.1%, 5.6%, 3.8% and 3.8%2.8%, respectively, of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized net operating income. As of December 31, 2018,2019, none of our tenants at our properties accounted for 10.0% or more of our total property portfolio’s annualized base rent or annualized net operating income, which is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect inclusive of our senior housing — RIDEA facilities and integrated senior health campuses operations as of December 31, 2018.2019.
21. Per Share Data
We report earnings (loss) per share pursuant to ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share for all periods presented are computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the period. Net income (loss) applicable to common stock is calculated as net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest less distributions allocated to participating securities of $28,000, $26,000$28,000 and $18,000,$26,000, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016.2017. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of our common stock and all potentially dilutive securities, if any. Nonvested
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
shares of our restricted common stock and redeemable limited partnership units of our operating partnership are participating securities and give rise to potentially dilutive shares of our common stock.
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
As of both December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, there were 46,500 and 45,000 nonvested shares respectively, of our restricted common stock outstanding, but such shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because such shares were anti-dilutive during these periods. As of both December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, there were 222 units of redeemable limited partnership units of our operating partnership outstanding, but such units were also excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because such units were anti-dilutive during these periods.
22. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Set forth below is the unaudited selected quarterly financial data. We believe that all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly, and in accordance with GAAP, the unaudited selected quarterly financial data when read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements. | | | | Quarters Ended | Quarters Ended |
| | December 31, 2018 | | September 30, 2018 | | June 30, 2018 | | March 31, 2018 | December 31, 2019 | | September 30, 2019 | | June 30, 2019 | | March 31, 2019 |
| Revenues | $ | 292,926,000 |
| | $ | 284,179,000 |
| | $ | 280,263,000 |
| | $ | 277,892,000 |
| $ | 315,365,000 |
| | $ | 301,762,000 |
| | $ | 304,931,000 |
| | $ | 301,058,000 |
|
| Expenses | (271,427,000 | ) | | (261,856,000 | ) | | (256,536,000 | ) | | (255,610,000 | ) | (292,219,000 | ) | | (295,503,000 | ) | | (279,771,000 | ) | | (275,226,000 | ) |
| Other expense | (19,749,000 | ) | | (18,543,000 | ) | | (23,571,000 | ) | | (14,228,000 | ) | (13,224,000 | ) | | (22,522,000 | ) | | (25,156,000 | ) | | (18,823,000 | ) |
| Income tax (expense) benefit | (144,000 | ) | | 44,000 |
| | 526,000 |
| | 371,000 |
| |
| Net income | 1,606,000 |
| | 3,824,000 |
| | 682,000 |
| | 8,425,000 |
| |
| Income tax expense | | (374,000 | ) | | (840,000 | ) | | (159,000 | ) | | (151,000 | ) |
| Net income (loss) | | 9,548,000 |
| | (17,103,000 | ) | | (155,000 | ) | | 6,858,000 |
|
| Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (16,000 | ) | | (212,000 | ) | | (740,000 | ) | | (272,000 | ) | (1,134,000 | ) | | (201,000 | ) | | (1,430,000 | ) | | (1,348,000 | ) |
| Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest | $ | 1,590,000 |
| | $ | 3,612,000 |
| | $ | (58,000 | ) | | $ | 8,153,000 |
| $ | 8,414,000 |
| | $ | (17,304,000 | ) | | $ | (1,585,000 | ) | | $ | 5,510,000 |
|
| Net income per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | 0.02 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.04 |
| |
| Net income (loss) per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 0.03 |
|
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 199,459,268 |
| | 199,818,444 |
| | 200,202,193 |
| | 200,347,084 |
| 195,268,047 |
| | 195,669,002 |
| | 196,075,614 |
| | 198,400,657 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarters Ended |
| | December 31, 2017 | | September 30, 2017 | | June 30, 2017 | | March 31, 2017 |
| Revenues | $ | 276,570,000 |
| | $ | 262,748,000 |
| | $ | 258,573,000 |
| | $ | 256,401,000 |
|
| Expenses | (246,854,000 | ) | | (244,266,000 | ) | | (244,877,000 | ) | | (245,497,000 | ) |
| Other expense | (24,552,000 | ) | | (14,741,000 | ) | | (12,738,000 | ) | | (18,644,000 | ) |
| Income tax benefit | 1,729,000 |
| | 720,000 |
| | 565,000 |
| | 213,000 |
|
| Net income (loss) | 6,893,000 |
| | 4,461,000 |
| | 1,523,000 |
| | (7,527,000 | ) |
| Less: net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | (179,000 | ) | | 176,000 |
| | 1,867,000 |
| | 4,008,000 |
|
| Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest | $ | 6,714,000 |
| | $ | 4,637,000 |
| | $ | 3,390,000 |
| | $ | (3,519,000 | ) |
| Net income (loss) per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.02 |
| | $ | 0.02 |
| | $ | (0.02 | ) |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 199,428,746 |
| | 198,733,528 |
| | 197,845,193 |
| | 196,897,807 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
23. Subsequent Events
2019 Corporate Line of Credit
On January 25, 2019, we terminated the 2016 Corporate Credit Agreement, as amended, and the 2016 Corporate Revolving Notes, with each of Bank of America, KeyBank and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, and we entered into a credit agreement, or the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement, with Bank of America as administrative agent, a swing line lender and a letter of credit issuer; KeyBank, as syndication agent, a swing line lender and a letter of credit issuer; Citizens Bank, National Association, as a syndication agent, a swing line lender, a letter of credit issuer, a joint lead arranger and joint bookrunner; and a syndicate of other banks, as lenders, to obtain a credit facility with an aggregate maximum principal amount of $630,000,000, or the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit. The 2019 Corporate Line of Credit consists of a senior unsecured revolving credit facility in the initial aggregate amount of $150,000,000 and a senior unsecured term loan facility in the initial aggregate amount of $480,000,000. We may obtain up to $25,000,000 in the form of standby letters of credit and up to $25,000,000 in the form of swing line loans. The 2019 Credit Facility matures on January 25, 2022, and may be extended for one 12-month period during the term of the 2019 Credit Agreement subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee.
The maximum principal amount of the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit may be increased by up to $370,000,000, for a total principal amount of $1,000,000,000, subject to: (i) the terms of the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement; and (ii) at least five business days’ prior written notice to Bank of America.
At our option, the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit bears interest at per annum rates equal to (a) (i) the Eurodollar Rate, (as defined in the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement) plus (ii) a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.20% based on our Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement), or (b) (i) the greater of: (1) the prime rate publicly announced by Bank of America, (2) the Federal Funds Rate (as defined in the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement) plus 0.50%, (3) the one-month Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00%, and (4) 0.00%, plus (ii) a margin ranging from 0.50% to 1.20% based on our Consolidated Leverage Ratio. Accrued interest on the 2019 Corporate Line of Credit is payable monthly. The loans may be repaid in whole or in part without prepayment premium or penalty, subject to certain conditions.
We are required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the lenders’ commitments under the 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement at a per annum rate equal to 0.20% if the average daily used amount is greater than 50% of the commitments and 0.25% if the average daily used amount is less than or equal to 50% of the commitments, which fee shall be measured and payable on a quarterly basis.
The 2019 Corporate Credit Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants that are customary for credit facilities and transactions of this type, including limitations on the incurrence of debt by our operating partnership and its subsidiaries and limitations on secured recourse indebtedness.
2019 DRIP Offering
On January 30, 2019, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to register a maximum of $200,000,000 of additional shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to the Amended and Restated DRIP, or the 2019 DRIP Offering. The Registration Statement on Form S-3 was automatically effective with the SEC upon its filing; however, we will not commence offering shares pursuant to the 2019 DRIP Offering until the termination of the 2015 DRIP Offering.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarters Ended |
| | December 31, 2018 | | September 30, 2018 | | June 30, 2018 | | March 31, 2018 |
| Revenues | $ | 292,926,000 |
| | $ | 284,179,000 |
| | $ | 280,263,000 |
| | $ | 277,892,000 |
|
| Expenses | (271,427,000 | ) | | (261,856,000 | ) | | (256,536,000 | ) | | (255,610,000 | ) |
| Other expense | (19,749,000 | ) | | (18,543,000 | ) | | (23,571,000 | ) | | (14,228,000 | ) |
| Income tax (expense) benefit | (144,000 | ) | | 44,000 |
| | 526,000 |
| | 371,000 |
|
| Net income | 1,606,000 |
| | 3,824,000 |
| | 682,000 |
| | 8,425,000 |
|
| Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (16,000 | ) | | (212,000 | ) | | (740,000 | ) | | (272,000 | ) |
| Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest | $ | 1,590,000 |
| | $ | 3,612,000 |
| | $ | (58,000 | ) | | $ | 8,153,000 |
|
| Net income (loss) per common share attributable to controlling interest — basic and diluted | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | 0.02 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.04 |
|
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 199,459,268 |
| | 199,818,444 |
| | 200,202,193 |
| | 200,347,084 |
|
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
| DeKalb Professional Center (Medical Office) | Lithonia, GA | | $ | — |
| | $ | 479,000 |
| | $ | 2,871,000 |
| | $ | 82,000 |
| | $ | 479,000 |
| | $ | 2,953,000 |
| | $ | 3,432,000 |
| | $ | (617,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 06/06/14 | Lithonia, GA | | $ | — |
| | $ | 479,000 |
| | $ | 2,871,000 |
| | $ | 87,000 |
| | $ | 479,000 |
| | $ | 2,958,000 |
| | $ | 3,437,000 |
| | $ | (709,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 06/06/14 |
| Country Club MOB (Medical Office) | Stockbridge, GA | | — |
| | 240,000 |
| | 2,306,000 |
| | 24,000 |
| | 240,000 |
| | 2,330,000 |
| | 2,570,000 |
| | (388,000 | ) | | 2002 |
| | 06/26/14 | Stockbridge, GA | | — |
| | 240,000 |
| | 2,306,000 |
| | 337,000 |
| | 240,000 |
| | 2,643,000 |
| | 2,883,000 |
| | (445,000 | ) | | 2002 |
| | 06/26/14 |
| Acworth Medical Complex (Medical Office) | Acworth, GA | | — |
| | 216,000 |
| | 3,135,000 |
| | 63,000 |
| | 216,000 |
| | 3,198,000 |
| | 3,414,000 |
| | (489,000 | ) | | 1976/2009 |
| | 07/02/14 | Acworth, GA | | — |
| | 216,000 |
| | 3,135,000 |
| | 63,000 |
| | 216,000 |
| | 3,198,000 |
| | 3,414,000 |
| | (595,000 | ) | | 1976/2009 |
| | 07/02/14 |
| | Acworth, GA | | — |
| | 250,000 |
| | 2,214,000 |
| | 7,000 |
| | 250,000 |
| | 2,221,000 |
| | 2,471,000 |
| | (392,000 | ) | | 1976/2009 |
| | 07/02/14 | Acworth, GA | | — |
| | 250,000 |
| | 2,214,000 |
| | 134,000 |
| | 250,000 |
| | 2,348,000 |
| | 2,598,000 |
| | (471,000 | ) | | 1976/2009 |
| | 07/02/14 |
| | Acworth, GA | | — |
| | 104,000 |
| | 774,000 |
| | 3,000 |
| | 104,000 |
| | 777,000 |
| | 881,000 |
| | (142,000 | ) | | 1976/2009 |
| | 07/02/14 | Acworth, GA | | — |
| | 104,000 |
| | 774,000 |
| | 3,000 |
| | 104,000 |
| | 777,000 |
| | 881,000 |
| | (170,000 | ) | | 1976/2009 |
| | 07/02/14 |
| Wichita KS MOB (Medical Office) | Wichita, KS | | — |
| | 943,000 |
| | 6,288,000 |
| | 296,000 |
| | 943,000 |
| | 6,584,000 |
| | 7,527,000 |
| | (1,140,000 | ) | | 1980/1996 |
| | 09/04/14 | Wichita, KS | | — |
| | 943,000 |
| | 6,288,000 |
| | 373,000 |
| | 943,000 |
| | 6,661,000 |
| | 7,604,000 |
| | (1,418,000 | ) | | 1980/1996 |
| | 09/04/14 |
| Delta Valley ALF Portfolio (Senior Housing) | Batesville, MS | | — |
| | 331,000 |
| | 5,103,000 |
| | (1,000 | ) | | 331,000 |
| | 5,102,000 |
| | 5,433,000 |
| | (751,000 | ) | | 1999/2005 |
| | 09/11/14 | Batesville, MS | | — |
| | 331,000 |
| | 5,103,000 |
| | (1,000 | ) | | 331,000 |
| | 5,102,000 |
| | 5,433,000 |
| | (924,000 | ) | | 1999/2005 |
| | 09/11/14 |
| | Cleveland, MS | | — |
| | 348,000 |
| | 6,369,000 |
| | — |
| | 348,000 |
| | 6,369,000 |
| | 6,717,000 |
| | (1,023,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 09/11/14 | Cleveland, MS | | — |
| | 348,000 |
| | 6,369,000 |
| | — |
| | 348,000 |
| | 6,369,000 |
| | 6,717,000 |
| | (1,259,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 09/11/14 |
| | Springdale, AR | | — |
| | 891,000 |
| | 6,538,000 |
| | — |
| | 891,000 |
| | 6,538,000 |
| | 7,429,000 |
| | (1,062,000 | ) | | 1998/2005 |
| | 01/08/15 | Springdale, AR | | — |
| | 891,000 |
| | 6,538,000 |
| | — |
| | 891,000 |
| | 6,538,000 |
| | 7,429,000 |
| | (1,283,000 | ) | | 1998/2005 |
| | 01/08/15 |
| Lee’s Summit MO MOB (Medical Office) | Lee’s Summit, MO | | — |
| | 1,045,000 |
| | 5,068,000 |
| | 398,000 |
| | 1,045,000 |
| | 5,466,000 |
| | 6,511,000 |
| | (1,325,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 09/18/14 | Lee’s Summit, MO | | — |
| | 1,045,000 |
| | 5,068,000 |
| | 420,000 |
| | 1,045,000 |
| | 5,488,000 |
| | 6,533,000 |
| | (1,454,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 09/18/14 |
| Carolina Commons MOB (Medical Office) | Indian Land, SC | | 7,155,000 |
| | 1,028,000 |
| | 9,430,000 |
| | 270,000 |
| | 1,028,000 |
| | 9,700,000 |
| | 10,728,000 |
| | (1,713,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 10/15/14 | Indian Land, SC | | 6,796,000 |
| | 1,028,000 |
| | 9,430,000 |
| | 1,330,000 |
| | 1,028,000 |
| | 10,760,000 |
| | 11,788,000 |
| | (1,728,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 10/15/14 |
| Mount Olympia MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Olympia Fields, IL | | — |
| | 298,000 |
| | 2,726,000 |
| | 21,000 |
| | 298,000 |
| | 2,747,000 |
| | 3,045,000 |
| | (401,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/04/14 | Mount Dora, FL | | — |
| | 393,000 |
| | 5,633,000 |
| | — |
| | 393,000 |
| | 5,633,000 |
| | 6,026,000 |
| | (882,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 12/04/14 |
| | Columbus, OH | | — |
| | 225,000 |
| | 5,649,000 |
| | 158,000 |
| | 225,000 |
| | 5,807,000 |
| | 6,032,000 |
| | (783,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/04/14 | Olympia Fields, IL | | — |
| | 298,000 |
| | 2,726,000 |
| | 21,000 |
| | 298,000 |
| | 2,747,000 |
| | 3,045,000 |
| | (502,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/04/14 |
| | Mount Dora, FL | | — |
| | 393,000 |
| | 5,633,000 |
| | — |
| | 393,000 |
| | 5,633,000 |
| | 6,026,000 |
| | (709,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 12/04/14 | Columbus, OH | | — |
| | 225,000 |
| | 5,649,000 |
| | 213,000 |
| | 225,000 |
| | 5,862,000 |
| | 6,087,000 |
| | (1,010,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/04/14 |
| Southlake TX Hospital (Hospital) | Southlake, TX | | — |
| | 5,089,000 |
| | 108,517,000 |
| | — |
| | 5,089,000 |
| | 108,517,000 |
| | 113,606,000 |
| | (11,877,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 12/04/14 | Southlake, TX | | — |
| | 5,089,000 |
| | 108,517,000 |
| | — |
| | 5,089,000 |
| | 108,517,000 |
| | 113,606,000 |
| | (14,787,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 12/04/14 |
| East Texas MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Longview, TX | | — |
| | — |
| | 19,942,000 |
| | 57,000 |
| | — |
| | 19,999,000 |
| | 19,999,000 |
| | (2,705,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/12/14 | Longview, TX | | — |
| | — |
| | 19,942,000 |
| | 73,000 |
| | — |
| | 20,015,000 |
| | 20,015,000 |
| | (3,375,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/12/14 |
| | Longview, TX | | — |
| | 228,000 |
| | 965,000 |
| | — |
| | 228,000 |
| | 965,000 |
| | 1,193,000 |
| | (236,000 | ) | | 1979/1997 |
| | 12/12/14 | Longview, TX | | — |
| | 228,000 |
| | 965,000 |
| | — |
| | 228,000 |
| | 965,000 |
| | 1,193,000 |
| | (280,000 | ) | | 1979/1997 |
| | 12/12/14 |
| | Longview, TX | | — |
| | 759,000 |
| | 1,696,000 |
| | — |
| | 759,000 |
| | 1,696,000 |
| | 2,455,000 |
| | (407,000 | ) | | 1998 |
| | 12/12/14 | Longview, TX | | — |
| | 759,000 |
| | 1,696,000 |
| | — |
| | 759,000 |
| | 1,696,000 |
| | 2,455,000 |
| | (507,000 | ) | | 1998 |
| | 12/12/14 |
| | Longview, TX | | — |
| | — |
| | 8,027,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,027,000 |
| | 8,027,000 |
| | (1,119,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/12/14 | Longview, TX | | — |
| | — |
| | 8,027,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,027,000 |
| | 8,027,000 |
| | (1,393,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/12/14 |
| | Marshall, TX | | — |
| | 368,000 |
| | 1,711,000 |
| | — |
| | 368,000 |
| | 1,711,000 |
| | 2,079,000 |
| | (475,000 | ) | | 1970 |
| | 12/12/14 | Longview, TX | | — |
| | — |
| | 696,000 |
| | 29,000 |
| | — |
| | 725,000 |
| | 725,000 |
| | (201,000 | ) | | 1956 |
| | 12/12/14 |
| | Longview, TX | | — |
| | — |
| | 696,000 |
| | 29,000 |
| | — |
| | 725,000 |
| | 725,000 |
| | (161,000 | ) | | 1956 |
| | 12/12/14 | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
| | | Longview, TX | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 27,601,000 |
| | $ | 3,064,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 30,665,000 |
| | $ | 30,665,000 |
| | $ | (5,432,000 | ) | | 1985/1993/ 2004 |
| | 12/12/14 |
| | Longview, TX | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 27,601,000 |
| | $ | 1,565,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 29,166,000 |
| | $ | 29,166,000 |
| | $ | (4,298,000 | ) | | 1985/1993/ 2004 |
| | 12/12/14 | Marshall, TX | | — |
| | 368,000 |
| | 1,711,000 |
| | 99,000 |
| | 368,000 |
| | 1,810,000 |
| | 2,178,000 |
| | (550,000 | ) | | 1970 |
| | 12/12/14 |
| Premier MOB (Medical Office) | Novi, MI | | — |
| | 644,000 |
| | 10,420,000 |
| | 770,000 |
| | 644,000 |
| | 11,190,000 |
| | 11,834,000 |
| | (1,495,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/19/14 | Novi, MI | | — |
| | 644,000 |
| | 10,420,000 |
| | 788,000 |
| | 644,000 |
| | 11,208,000 |
| | 11,852,000 |
| | (1,955,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/19/14 |
| Independence MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Southgate, KY | | — |
| | 411,000 |
| | 11,005,000 |
| | 1,179,000 |
| | 411,000 |
| | 12,184,000 |
| | 12,595,000 |
| | (1,490,000 | ) | | 1988 |
| | 01/13/15 | Southgate, KY | | — |
| | 411,000 |
| | 11,005,000 |
| | 1,709,000 |
| | 411,000 |
| | 12,714,000 |
| | 13,125,000 |
| | (1,959,000 | ) | | 1988 |
| | 01/13/15 |
| | Somerville, MA | | — |
| | 1,509,000 |
| | 46,775,000 |
| | 1,662,000 |
| | 1,509,000 |
| | 48,437,000 |
| | 49,946,000 |
| | (5,216,000 | ) | | 1990 |
| | 01/13/15 | Somerville, MA | | 30,906,000 |
| | 1,509,000 |
| | 46,775,000 |
| | 3,279,000 |
| | 1,509,000 |
| | 50,054,000 |
| | 51,563,000 |
| | (6,523,000 | ) | | 1990 |
| | 01/13/15 |
| | Morristown, NJ | | — |
| | 3,763,000 |
| | 26,957,000 |
| | 2,223,000 |
| | 3,764,000 |
| | 29,179,000 |
| | 32,943,000 |
| | (4,454,000 | ) | | 1980 |
| | 01/13/15 | Morristown, NJ | | 28,911,000 |
| | 3,763,000 |
| | 26,957,000 |
| | 3,261,000 |
| | 3,763,000 |
| | 30,218,000 |
| | 33,981,000 |
| | (5,667,000 | ) | | 1980 |
| | 01/13/15 |
| | Verona, NJ | | — |
| | 1,683,000 |
| | 9,405,000 |
| | 402,000 |
| | 1,683,000 |
| | 9,807,000 |
| | 11,490,000 |
| | (1,415,000 | ) | | 1970 |
| | 01/13/15 | Verona, NJ | | — |
| | 1,683,000 |
| | 9,405,000 |
| | 590,000 |
| | 1,683,000 |
| | 9,995,000 |
| | 11,678,000 |
| | (1,780,000 | ) | | 1970 |
| | 01/13/15 |
| | Bronx, NY | | — |
| | — |
| | 19,593,000 |
| | 1,651,000 |
| | — |
| | 21,244,000 |
| | 21,244,000 |
| | (2,527,000 | ) | | 1987/1988 |
| | 01/26/15 | Bronx, NY | | — |
| | — |
| | 19,593,000 |
| | 2,506,000 |
| | — |
| | 22,099,000 |
| | 22,099,000 |
| | (3,205,000 | ) | | 1987/1988 |
| | 01/26/15 |
| King of Prussia PA MOB (Medical Office) | King of Prussia, PA | | 9,225,000 |
| | 3,427,000 |
| | 13,849,000 |
| | 2,460,000 |
| | 3,427,000 |
| | 16,309,000 |
| | 19,736,000 |
| | (2,366,000 | ) | | 1946/2000 |
| | 01/21/15 | King of Prussia, PA | | 9,015,000 |
| | 3,427,000 |
| | 13,849,000 |
| | 4,117,000 |
| | 3,427,000 |
| | 17,966,000 |
| | 21,393,000 |
| | (3,191,000 | ) | | 1946/2000 |
| | 01/21/15 |
| North Carolina ALF Portfolio (Senior Housing) | Clemmons, NC | | — |
| | 596,000 |
| | 13,237,000 |
| | — |
| | 596,000 |
| | 13,237,000 |
| | 13,833,000 |
| | (1,514,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 06/29/15 | |
North Carolina ALF Portfolio (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | | Clemmons, NC | | — |
| | 596,000 |
| | 13,237,000 |
| | (799,000 | ) | | 596,000 |
| | 12,438,000 |
| | 13,034,000 |
| | (1,707,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 06/29/15 |
| | | Garner, NC | | — |
| | 1,723,000 |
| | 11,517,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,723,000 |
| | 11,517,000 |
| | 13,240,000 |
| | (309,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 03/27/19 |
| | Mooresville, NC | | — |
| | 835,000 |
| | 15,894,000 |
| | — |
| | 835,000 |
| | 15,894,000 |
| | 16,729,000 |
| | (1,912,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 01/28/15 | Huntersville, NC | | — |
| | 2,033,000 |
| | 11,494,000 |
| | (214,000 | ) | | 2,033,000 |
| | 11,280,000 |
| | 13,313,000 |
| | (1,060,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 01/18/17 |
| | Raleigh, NC | | — |
| | 1,069,000 |
| | 21,235,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,069,000 |
| | 21,235,000 |
| | 22,304,000 |
| | (2,390,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 01/28/15 | Matthews, NC | | — |
| | 949,000 |
| | 12,537,000 |
| | (199,000 | ) | | 949,000 |
| | 12,338,000 |
| | 13,287,000 |
| | (554,000 | ) | | 2017 |
| | 08/30/18 |
| | Wake Forest, NC | | — |
| | 772,000 |
| | 13,596,000 |
| | — |
| | 772,000 |
| | 13,596,000 |
| | 14,368,000 |
| | (1,480,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 06/29/15 | Mooresville, NC | | — |
| | 835,000 |
| | 15,894,000 |
| | (796,000 | ) | | 835,000 |
| | 15,098,000 |
| | 15,933,000 |
| | (2,141,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 01/28/15 |
| | Huntersville, NC | | — |
| | 2,033,000 |
| | 11,494,000 |
| | — |
| | 2,033,000 |
| | 11,494,000 |
| | 13,527,000 |
| | (724,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 01/18/17 | Raleigh, NC | | — |
| | 1,069,000 |
| | 21,235,000 |
| | (803,000 | ) | | 1,069,000 |
| | 20,432,000 |
| | 21,501,000 |
| | (2,738,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 01/28/15 |
| | Matthews, NC | | — |
| | 949,000 |
| | 12,537,000 |
| | — |
| | 949,000 |
| | 12,537,000 |
| | 13,486,000 |
| | (143,000 | ) | | 2017 |
| | 08/30/18 | Wake Forest, NC | | — |
| | 772,000 |
| | 13,596,000 |
| | (878,000 | ) | | 772,000 |
| | 12,718,000 |
| | 13,490,000 |
| | (1,640,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 06/29/15 |
| Orange Star Medical Portfolio (Medical Office and Hospital) | Keller, TX | | — |
| | 1,604,000 |
| | 7,912,000 |
| | 28,000 |
| | 1,604,000 |
| | 7,940,000 |
| | 9,544,000 |
| | (1,041,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 02/26/15 | Durango, CO | | — |
| | 623,000 |
| | 14,166,000 |
| | 232,000 |
| | 623,000 |
| | 14,398,000 |
| | 15,021,000 |
| | (1,978,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 02/26/15 |
| | Wharton, TX | | — |
| | 259,000 |
| | 10,590,000 |
| | 216,000 |
| | 259,000 |
| | 10,806,000 |
| | 11,065,000 |
| | (1,284,000 | ) | | 1987 |
| | 02/26/15 | Durango, CO | | — |
| | 788,000 |
| | 10,467,000 |
| | 477,000 |
| | 788,000 |
| | 10,944,000 |
| | 11,732,000 |
| | (1,697,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 02/26/15 |
| | Friendswood, TX | | — |
| | 500,000 |
| | 7,664,000 |
| | 218,000 |
| | 500,000 |
| | 7,882,000 |
| | 8,382,000 |
| | (951,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 02/26/15 | Friendswood, TX | | — |
| | 500,000 |
| | 7,664,000 |
| | 317,000 |
| | 500,000 |
| | 7,981,000 |
| | 8,481,000 |
| | (1,212,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 02/26/15 |
| | Durango, CO | | — |
| | 623,000 |
| | 14,166,000 |
| | 228,000 |
| | 623,000 |
| | 14,394,000 |
| | 15,017,000 |
| | (1,560,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 02/26/15 | Keller, TX | | — |
| | 1,604,000 |
| | 7,912,000 |
| | 15,000 |
| | 1,604,000 |
| | 7,927,000 |
| | 9,531,000 |
| | (1,277,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 02/26/15 |
| | Durango, CO | | — |
| | 788,000 |
| | 10,467,000 |
| | 458,000 |
| | 788,000 |
| | 10,925,000 |
| | 11,713,000 |
| | (1,328,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 02/26/15 | Wharton, TX | | — |
| | 259,000 |
| | 10,590,000 |
| | 228,000 |
| | 259,000 |
| | 10,818,000 |
| | 11,077,000 |
| | (1,627,000 | ) | | 1987 |
| | 02/26/15 |
| Kingwood MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Kingwood, TX | | — |
| | 820,000 |
| | 8,589,000 |
| | 89,000 |
| | 820,000 |
| | 8,678,000 |
| | 9,498,000 |
| | (1,094,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 03/11/15 | Kingwood, TX | | — |
| | 820,000 |
| | 8,589,000 |
| | 95,000 |
| | 820,000 |
| | 8,684,000 |
| | 9,504,000 |
| | (1,385,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 03/11/15 |
| | Kingwood, TX | | — |
| | 781,000 |
| | 3,943,000 |
| | — |
| | 781,000 |
| | 3,943,000 |
| | 4,724,000 |
| | (531,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 03/11/15 | |
| Mt Juliet TN MOB (Medical Office) | Mount Juliet, TN | | — |
| | 1,188,000 |
| | 10,720,000 |
| | (39,000 | ) | | 1,188,000 |
| | 10,681,000 |
| | 11,869,000 |
| | (1,282,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 03/17/15 | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
| | | Kingwood, TX | | $ | — |
| | $ | 781,000 |
| | $ | 3,943,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 781,000 |
| | $ | 3,943,000 |
| | $ | 4,724,000 |
| | $ | (669,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 03/11/15 |
| Mt Juliet TN MOB (Medical Office) | | Mount Juliet, TN | | — |
| | 1,188,000 |
| | 10,720,000 |
| | 2,000 |
| | 1,188,000 |
| | 10,722,000 |
| | 11,910,000 |
| | (1,622,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 03/17/15 |
| Homewood AL MOB (Medical Office) | Homewood, AL | | $ | — |
| | $ | 405,000 |
| | $ | 6,590,000 |
| | $ | (295,000 | ) | | $ | 405,000 |
| | $ | 6,295,000 |
| | $ | 6,700,000 |
| | $ | (731,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 03/27/15 | Homewood, AL | | — |
| | 405,000 |
| | 6,590,000 |
| | (79,000 | ) | | 405,000 |
| | 6,511,000 |
| | 6,916,000 |
| | (978,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 03/27/15 |
| Paoli PA Medical Plaza (Medical Office) | Paoli, PA | | 13,014,000 |
| | 2,313,000 |
| | 12,447,000 |
| | 1,591,000 |
| | 2,313,000 |
| | 14,038,000 |
| | 16,351,000 |
| | (1,774,000 | ) | | 1951 |
| | 04/10/15 | Paoli, PA | | 12,715,000 |
| | 2,313,000 |
| | 12,447,000 |
| | 1,962,000 |
| | 2,313,000 |
| | 14,409,000 |
| | 16,722,000 |
| | (2,128,000 | ) | | 1951 |
| | 04/10/15 |
| | Paoli, PA | | — |
| | 1,668,000 |
| | 7,357,000 |
| | 1,257,000 |
| | 1,668,000 |
| | 8,614,000 |
| | 10,282,000 |
| | (1,200,000 | ) | | 1975 |
| | 04/10/15 | Paoli, PA | | — |
| | 1,668,000 |
| | 7,357,000 |
| | 1,335,000 |
| | 1,668,000 |
| | 8,692,000 |
| | 10,360,000 |
| | (1,592,000 | ) | | 1975 |
| | 04/10/15 |
| Glen Burnie MD MOB (Medical Office) | Glen Burnie, MD | | — |
| | 2,692,000 |
| | 14,095,000 |
| | 1,711,000 |
| | 2,692,000 |
| | 15,806,000 |
| | 18,498,000 |
| | (2,092,000 | ) | | 1981 |
| | 05/06/15 | Glen Burnie, MD | | — |
| | 2,692,000 |
| | 14,095,000 |
| | 2,419,000 |
| | 2,692,000 |
| | 16,514,000 |
| | 19,206,000 |
| | (2,781,000 | ) | | 1981 |
| | 05/06/15 |
| Marietta GA MOB (Medical Office) | Marietta, GA | | — |
| | 1,347,000 |
| | 10,947,000 |
| | 34,000 |
| | 1,347,000 |
| | 10,981,000 |
| | 12,328,000 |
| | (1,252,000 | ) | | 2002 |
| | 05/07/15 | Marietta, GA | | — |
| | 1,347,000 |
| | 10,947,000 |
| | 51,000 |
| | 1,347,000 |
| | 10,998,000 |
| | 12,345,000 |
| | (1,595,000 | ) | | 2002 |
| | 05/07/15 |
Mountain Crest Senior Housing Portfolio (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Elkhart, IN | | — |
| | 793,000 |
| | 6,009,000 |
| | 106,000 |
| | 793,000 |
| | 6,115,000 |
| | 6,908,000 |
| | (966,000 | ) | | 1997 |
| | 05/14/15 | Elkhart, IN | | — |
| | 793,000 |
| | 6,009,000 |
| | 138,000 |
| | 793,000 |
| | 6,147,000 |
| | 6,940,000 |
| | (1,218,000 | ) | | 1997 |
| | 05/14/15 |
| | Elkhart, IN | | — |
| | 782,000 |
| | 6,760,000 |
| | 403,000 |
| | 782,000 |
| | 7,163,000 |
| | 7,945,000 |
| | (1,177,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 05/14/15 | Elkhart, IN | | — |
| | 782,000 |
| | 6,760,000 |
| | 515,000 |
| | 782,000 |
| | 7,275,000 |
| | 8,057,000 |
| | (1,446,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 05/14/15 |
| | Hobart, IN | | — |
| | 604,000 |
| | 11,529,000 |
| | (156,000 | ) | | 604,000 |
| | 11,373,000 |
| | 11,977,000 |
| | (1,376,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 05/14/15 | Hobart, IN | | — |
| | 604,000 |
| | 11,529,000 |
| | 2,000 |
| | 604,000 |
| | 11,531,000 |
| | 12,135,000 |
| | (1,756,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 05/14/15 |
| | LaPorte, IN | | — |
| | 392,000 |
| | 14,894,000 |
| | 254,000 |
| | 392,000 |
| | 15,148,000 |
| | 15,540,000 |
| | (1,828,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 05/14/15 | LaPorte, IN | | — |
| | 392,000 |
| | 14,894,000 |
| | 247,000 |
| | 392,000 |
| | 15,141,000 |
| | 15,533,000 |
| | (2,305,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 05/14/15 |
| | Mishawaka, IN | | 9,597,000 |
| | 3,670,000 |
| | 14,416,000 |
| | 291,000 |
| | 3,670,000 |
| | 14,707,000 |
| | 18,377,000 |
| | (1,792,000 | ) | | 1978 |
| | 07/14/15 | Mishawaka, IN | | 9,365,000 |
| | 3,670,000 |
| | 14,416,000 |
| | 581,000 |
| | 3,670,000 |
| | 14,997,000 |
| | 18,667,000 |
| | (2,323,000 | ) | | 1978 |
| | 07/14/15 |
| | Niles, MI | | — |
| | 404,000 |
| | 5,050,000 |
| | 146,000 |
| | 404,000 |
| | 5,196,000 |
| | 5,600,000 |
| | (796,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/11/15 and 11/20/15 | Niles, MI | | — |
| | 404,000 |
| | 5,050,000 |
| | 248,000 |
| | 404,000 |
| | 5,298,000 |
| | 5,702,000 |
| | (983,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/11/15 and 11/20/15 |
| Mount Dora Medical Center (Medical Office) | Mount Dora, FL | | — |
| | 736,000 |
| | 14,616,000 |
| | (6,996,000 | ) | | 736,000 |
| | 7,620,000 |
| | 8,356,000 |
| | (1,184,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 05/15/15 | Mount Dora, FL | | — |
| | 736,000 |
| | 14,616,000 |
| | (7,022,000 | ) | | 736,000 |
| | 7,594,000 |
| | 8,330,000 |
| | (1,361,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 05/15/15 |
Nebraska Senior Housing Portfolio (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Bennington, NE | | — |
| | 981,000 |
| | 20,427,000 |
| | 195,000 |
| | 981,000 |
| | 20,622,000 |
| | 21,603,000 |
| | (2,303,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 05/29/15 | Bennington, NE | | — |
| | 981,000 |
| | 20,427,000 |
| | 284,000 |
| | 981,000 |
| | 20,711,000 |
| | 21,692,000 |
| | (2,895,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 05/29/15 |
| | Omaha, NE | | — |
| | 1,274,000 |
| | 38,619,000 |
| | 283,000 |
| | 1,274,000 |
| | 38,902,000 |
| | 40,176,000 |
| | (3,934,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 05/29/15 | Omaha, NE | | — |
| | 1,274,000 |
| | 38,619,000 |
| | 647,000 |
| | 1,274,000 |
| | 39,266,000 |
| | 40,540,000 |
| | (5,026,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 05/29/15 |
Pennsylvania Senior Housing Portfolio (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Bethlehem, PA | | 11,325,000 |
| | 1,542,000 |
| | 22,249,000 |
| | 304,000 |
| | 1,542,000 |
| | 22,553,000 |
| | 24,095,000 |
| | (2,666,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 06/30/15 | Bethlehem, PA | | — |
| | 1,542,000 |
| | 22,249,000 |
| | 490,000 |
| | 1,542,000 |
| | 22,739,000 |
| | 24,281,000 |
| | (3,417,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 06/30/15 |
| | Boyertown, PA | | — |
| | 480,000 |
| | 25,544,000 |
| | 266,000 |
| | 480,000 |
| | 25,810,000 |
| | 26,290,000 |
| | (2,632,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/30/15 | Boyertown, PA | | 22,932,000 |
| | 480,000 |
| | 25,544,000 |
| | 375,000 |
| | 480,000 |
| | 25,919,000 |
| | 26,399,000 |
| | (3,437,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/30/15 |
| | York, PA | | — |
| | 972,000 |
| | 29,860,000 |
| | 24,000 |
| | 972,000 |
| | 29,884,000 |
| | 30,856,000 |
| | (3,046,000 | ) | | 1986 |
| | 06/30/15 | |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
| | | York, PA | | $ | 12,432,000 |
| | $ | 972,000 |
| | $ | 29,860,000 |
| | $ | 206,000 |
| | $ | 972,000 |
| | $ | 30,066,000 |
| | $ | 31,038,000 |
| | $ | (3,943,000 | ) | | 1986 |
| | 06/30/15 |
| Southern Illinois MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Waterloo, IL | | $ | — |
| | $ | 94,000 |
| | $ | 1,977,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 94,000 |
| | $ | 1,977,000 |
| | $ | 2,071,000 |
| | $ | (243,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 07/01/15 | Waterloo, IL | | — |
| | 94,000 |
| | 1,977,000 |
| | — |
| | 94,000 |
| | 1,977,000 |
| | 2,071,000 |
| | (314,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 07/01/15 |
| | Waterloo, IL | | — |
| | 736,000 |
| | 6,332,000 |
| | 348,000 |
| | 736,000 |
| | 6,680,000 |
| | 7,416,000 |
| | (877,000 | ) | | 1995 |
| | 07/01/15, 12/19/17 and 04/17/18 | Waterloo, IL | | — |
| | 738,000 |
| | 6,332,000 |
| | 471,000 |
| | 738,000 |
| | 6,803,000 |
| | 7,541,000 |
| | (1,169,000 | ) | | 1995 |
| | 07/01/15, 12/19/17 and 04/17/18 |
| | Waterloo, IL | | — |
| | 200,000 |
| | 2,648,000 |
| | 62,000 |
| | 200,000 |
| | 2,710,000 |
| | 2,910,000 |
| | (354,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 07/01/15 | Waterloo, IL | | — |
| | 200,000 |
| | 2,648,000 |
| | 62,000 |
| | 200,000 |
| | 2,710,000 |
| | 2,910,000 |
| | (459,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 07/01/15 |
| Napa Medical Center (Medical Office) | Napa, CA | | — |
| | 1,176,000 |
| | 13,328,000 |
| | 1,366,000 |
| | 1,176,000 |
| | 14,694,000 |
| | 15,870,000 |
| | (1,936,000 | ) | | 1980 |
| | 07/02/15 | Napa, CA | | — |
| | 1,176,000 |
| | 13,328,000 |
| | 1,485,000 |
| | 1,176,000 |
| | 14,813,000 |
| | 15,989,000 |
| | (2,418,000 | ) | | 1980 |
| | 07/02/15 |
| Chesterfield Corporate Plaza (Medical Office) | Chesterfield, MO | | — |
| | 8,030,000 |
| | 24,533,000 |
| | 2,249,000 |
| | 8,030,000 |
| | 26,782,000 |
| | 34,812,000 |
| | (3,718,000 | ) | | 1989 |
| | 08/14/15 | Chesterfield, MO | | — |
| | 8,030,000 |
| | 24,533,000 |
| | 2,674,000 |
| | 8,030,000 |
| | 27,207,000 |
| | 35,237,000 |
| | (4,900,000 | ) | | 1989 |
| | 08/14/15 |
Richmond VA ALF(Senior Housing — RIDEA) | North Chesterfield, VA | | 35,129,000 |
| | 2,146,000 |
| | 56,671,000 |
| | 245,000 |
| | 2,146,000 |
| | 56,916,000 |
| | 59,062,000 |
| | (5,051,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 09/11/15 | |
Richmond VA ALF (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | | North Chesterfield, VA | | 34,281,000 |
| | 2,146,000 |
| | 56,671,000 |
| | 479,000 |
| | 2,146,000 |
| | 57,150,000 |
| | 59,296,000 |
| | (6,599,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 09/11/15 |
| Crown Senior Care Portfolio (Senior Housing) | Peel, Isle of Man | | — |
| | 1,165,000 |
| | 6,954,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,165,000 |
| | 6,954,000 |
| | 8,119,000 |
| | (693,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 09/15/15 | Peel, Isle of Man | | — |
| | 1,206,000 |
| | 7,200,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,206,000 |
| | 7,200,000 |
| | 8,406,000 |
| | (933,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 09/15/15 |
| | St. Albans, UK | | — |
| | 1,175,000 |
| | 12,348,000 |
| | 449,000 |
| | 1,175,000 |
| | 12,797,000 |
| | 13,972,000 |
| | (1,160,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 10/08/15 | St. Albans, UK | | — |
| | 1,216,000 |
| | 13,249,000 |
| | 241,000 |
| | 1,216,000 |
| | 13,490,000 |
| | 14,706,000 |
| | (1,625,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 10/08/15 |
| | Salisbury, UK | | — |
| | 1,248,000 |
| | 11,990,000 |
| | 4,000 |
| | 1,248,000 |
| | 11,994,000 |
| | 13,242,000 |
| | (1,124,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 12/08/15 | Salisbury, UK | | — |
| | 1,292,000 |
| | 12,418,000 |
| | 37,000 |
| | 1,292,000 |
| | 12,455,000 |
| | 13,747,000 |
| | (1,541,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 12/08/15 |
| | Aberdeen, UK | | — |
| | 2,026,000 |
| | 6,039,000 |
| | — |
| | 2,026,000 |
| | 6,039,000 |
| | 8,065,000 |
| | (375,000 | ) | | 1986 |
| | 11/15/16 | Aberdeen, UK | | — |
| | 2,097,000 |
| | 6,252,000 |
| | — |
| | 2,097,000 |
| | 6,252,000 |
| | 8,349,000 |
| | (568,000 | ) | | 1986 |
| | 11/15/16 |
| | Felixstowe, UK | | — |
| | 704,000 |
| | 5,803,000 |
| | 97,000 |
| | 704,000 |
| | 5,900,000 |
| | 6,604,000 |
| | (338,000 | ) | | 2010/2011 |
| | 11/15/16 | Felixstowe, UK | | — |
| | 729,000 |
| | 6,110,000 |
| | 429,000 |
| | 729,000 |
| | 6,539,000 |
| | 7,268,000 |
| | (542,000 | ) | | 2010/2011 |
| | 11/15/16 |
| | Felixstowe, UK | | — |
| | 531,000 |
| | 2,543,000 |
| | 66,000 |
| | 531,000 |
| | 2,609,000 |
| | 3,140,000 |
| | (165,000 | ) | | 2010/2011 |
| | 11/15/16 | Felixstowe, UK | | — |
| | 550,000 |
| | 2,702,000 |
| | 286,000 |
| | 550,000 |
| | 2,988,000 |
| | 3,538,000 |
| | (268,000 | ) | | 2010/2011 |
| | 11/15/16 |
| Washington DC SNF (Skilled Nursing) | Washington, DC | | — |
| | 1,194,000 |
| | 34,200,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,194,000 |
| | 34,200,000 |
| | 35,394,000 |
| | (3,802,000 | ) | | 1983 |
| | 10/29/15 | Washington, DC | | — |
| | 1,194,000 |
| | 34,200,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,194,000 |
| | 34,200,000 |
| | 35,394,000 |
| | (4,904,000 | ) | | 1983 |
| | 10/29/15 |
| Stockbridge GA MOB II (Medical Office) | Stockbridge, GA | | — |
| | 499,000 |
| | 8,353,000 |
| | 211,000 |
| | 499,000 |
| | 8,564,000 |
| | 9,063,000 |
| | (983,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/03/15 | Stockbridge, GA | | — |
| | 499,000 |
| | 8,353,000 |
| | 509,000 |
| | 499,000 |
| | 8,862,000 |
| | 9,361,000 |
| | (1,304,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/03/15 |
| Marietta GA MOB II (Medical Office) | Marietta, GA | | — |
| | 661,000 |
| | 4,783,000 |
| | 131,000 |
| | 661,000 |
| | 4,914,000 |
| | 5,575,000 |
| | (536,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/09/15 | Marietta, GA | | — |
| | 661,000 |
| | 4,783,000 |
| | 142,000 |
| | 661,000 |
| | 4,925,000 |
| | 5,586,000 |
| | (716,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/09/15 |
| Naperville MOB (Medical Office) | Naperville, IL | | — |
| | 392,000 |
| | 3,765,000 |
| | 30,000 |
| | 392,000 |
| | 3,795,000 |
| | 4,187,000 |
| | (513,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 01/12/16 | Naperville, IL | | — |
| | 392,000 |
| | 3,765,000 |
| | 58,000 |
| | 392,000 |
| | 3,823,000 |
| | 4,215,000 |
| | (684,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 01/12/16 |
| | Naperville, IL | | — |
| | 548,000 |
| | 11,815,000 |
| | 40,000 |
| | 548,000 |
| | 11,855,000 |
| | 12,403,000 |
| | (1,254,000 | ) | | 1989 |
| | 01/12/16 | Naperville, IL | | — |
| | 548,000 |
| | 11,815,000 |
| | 199,000 |
| | 548,000 |
| | 12,014,000 |
| | 12,562,000 |
| | (1,668,000 | ) | | 1989 |
| | 01/12/16 |
| Lakeview IN Medical Plaza (Medical Office) | Indianapolis, IN | | 20,000,000 |
| | 2,375,000 |
| | 15,911,000 |
| | 3,554,000 |
| | 2,375,000 |
| | 19,465,000 |
| | 21,840,000 |
| | (2,742,000 | ) | | 1987 |
| | 01/21/16 | Indianapolis, IN | | 20,000,000 |
| | 2,375,000 |
| | 15,911,000 |
| | 4,733,000 |
| | 2,375,000 |
| | 20,644,000 |
| | 23,019,000 |
| | (3,770,000 | ) | | 1987 |
| | 01/21/16 |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
Pennsylvania Senior Housing Portfolio II (Senior Housing — RIDEA) | Palmyra, PA | | $ | — |
| | $ | 835,000 |
| | $ | 24,424,000 |
| | $ | 97,000 |
| | $ | 835,000 |
| | $ | 24,521,000 |
| | $ | 25,356,000 |
| | $ | (2,842,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 02/01/16 | Palmyra, PA | | $ | 19,114,000 |
| | $ | 835,000 |
| | $ | 24,424,000 |
| | $ | 199,000 |
| | $ | 835,000 |
| | $ | 24,623,000 |
| | $ | 25,458,000 |
| | $ | (3,610,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 02/01/16 |
| Snellville GA MOB (Medical Office) | Snellville, GA | | — |
| | 332,000 |
| | 7,781,000 |
| | 816,000 |
| | 332,000 |
| | 8,597,000 |
| | 8,929,000 |
| | (919,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 02/05/16 | Snellville, GA | | — |
| | 332,000 |
| | 7,781,000 |
| | 277,000 |
| | 332,000 |
| | 8,058,000 |
| | 8,390,000 |
| | (1,122,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 02/05/16 |
| Lakebrook Medical Center (Medical Office) | Westbrook, CT | | — |
| | 653,000 |
| | 4,855,000 |
| | 155,000 |
| | 653,000 |
| | 5,010,000 |
| | 5,663,000 |
| | (561,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 02/19/16 | Westbrook, CT | | — |
| | 653,000 |
| | 4,855,000 |
| | 276,000 |
| | 653,000 |
| | 5,131,000 |
| | 5,784,000 |
| | (748,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 02/19/16 |
| Stockbridge GA MOB III (Medical Office) | Stockbridge, GA | | — |
| | 606,000 |
| | 7,924,000 |
| | 72,000 |
| | 606,000 |
| | 7,996,000 |
| | 8,602,000 |
| | (858,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 03/29/16 | Stockbridge, GA | | — |
| | 606,000 |
| | 7,924,000 |
| | 293,000 |
| | 606,000 |
| | 8,217,000 |
| | 8,823,000 |
| | (1,109,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 03/29/16 |
| Joplin MO MOB (Medical Office) | Joplin, MO | | — |
| | 1,245,000 |
| | 9,860,000 |
| | (41,000 | ) | | 1,245,000 |
| | 9,819,000 |
| | 11,064,000 |
| | (1,320,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 05/10/16 | Joplin, MO | | — |
| | 1,245,000 |
| | 9,860,000 |
| | 41,000 |
| | 1,245,000 |
| | 9,901,000 |
| | 11,146,000 |
| | (1,827,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 05/10/16 |
| Austell GA MOB (Medical Office) | Austell, GA | | — |
| | 663,000 |
| | 10,547,000 |
| | (8,000 | ) | | 663,000 |
| | 10,539,000 |
| | 11,202,000 |
| | (817,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 05/25/16 | Austell, GA | | — |
| | 663,000 |
| | 10,547,000 |
| | 10,000 |
| | 663,000 |
| | 10,557,000 |
| | 11,220,000 |
| | (1,141,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 05/25/16 |
| Middletown OH MOB (Medical Office) | Middletown, OH | | — |
| | — |
| | 17,389,000 |
| | 153,000 |
| | — |
| | 17,542,000 |
| | 17,542,000 |
| | (1,396,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 06/16/16 | Middletown, OH | | — |
| | — |
| | 17,389,000 |
| | 354,000 |
| | — |
| | 17,743,000 |
| | 17,743,000 |
| | (1,884,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 06/16/16 |
| Fox Grape SNF Portfolio (Skilled Nursing) | Braintree, MA | | — |
| | 1,875,000 |
| | 10,847,000 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 1,845,000 |
| | 10,878,000 |
| | 12,723,000 |
| | (776,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 07/01/16 | Braintree, MA | | — |
| | 1,844,000 |
| | 10,847,000 |
| | 31,000 |
| | 1,844,000 |
| | 10,878,000 |
| | 12,722,000 |
| | (1,086,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 07/01/16 |
| | Brighton, MA | | — |
| | 758,000 |
| | 2,661,000 |
| | 355,000 |
| | 779,000 |
| | 2,995,000 |
| | 3,774,000 |
| | (227,000 | ) | | 1982 |
| | 07/01/16 | Brighton, MA | | — |
| | 779,000 |
| | 2,661,000 |
| | 334,000 |
| | 779,000 |
| | 2,995,000 |
| | 3,774,000 |
| | (327,000 | ) | | 1982 |
| | 07/01/16 |
| | Duxbury, MA | | — |
| | 2,823,000 |
| | 11,244,000 |
| | 104,000 |
| | 2,922,000 |
| | 11,249,000 |
| | 14,171,000 |
| | (874,000 | ) | | 1983 |
| | 07/01/16 | Duxbury, MA | | — |
| | 2,921,000 |
| | 11,244,000 |
| | 1,933,000 |
| | 2,921,000 |
| | 13,177,000 |
| | 16,098,000 |
| | (1,233,000 | ) | | 1983 |
| | 07/01/16 |
| | Hingham, MA | | — |
| | 2,150,000 |
| | 17,390,000 |
| | — |
| | 2,316,000 |
| | 17,224,000 |
| | 19,540,000 |
| | (1,223,000 | ) | | 1990 |
| | 07/01/16 | Hingham, MA | | — |
| | 2,316,000 |
| | 17,390,000 |
| | (166,000 | ) | | 2,316,000 |
| | 17,224,000 |
| | 19,540,000 |
| | (1,713,000 | ) | | 1990 |
| | 07/01/16 |
| | Weymouth, MA | | — |
| | 1,818,000 |
| | 5,286,000 |
| | 418,000 |
| | 1,857,000 |
| | 5,665,000 |
| | 7,522,000 |
| | (448,000 | ) | | 1963 |
| | 07/01/16 | Weymouth, MA | | — |
| | 1,857,000 |
| | 5,286,000 |
| | 377,000 |
| | 1,857,000 |
| | 5,663,000 |
| | 7,520,000 |
| | (637,000 | ) | | 1963 |
| | 07/01/16 |
| | Quincy, MA | | 15,319,000 |
| | 3,537,000 |
| | 13,697,000 |
| | 156,000 |
| | 3,537,000 |
| | 13,853,000 |
| | 17,390,000 |
| | (864,000 | ) | | 1995 |
| | 11/01/16 | Quincy, MA | | 14,938,000 |
| | 3,537,000 |
| | 13,697,000 |
| | 184,000 |
| | 3,537,000 |
| | 13,881,000 |
| | 17,418,000 |
| | (1,270,000 | ) | | 1995 |
| | 11/01/16 |
| Voorhees NJ MOB (Medical Office) | Voorhees, NJ | | — |
| | 1,727,000 |
| | 8,451,000 |
| | 368,000 |
| | 1,727,000 |
| | 8,819,000 |
| | 10,546,000 |
| | (855,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 07/08/16 | Voorhees, NJ | | — |
| | 1,727,000 |
| | 8,451,000 |
| | 607,000 |
| | 1,727,000 |
| | 9,058,000 |
| | 10,785,000 |
| | (1,212,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 07/08/16 |
| Norwich CT MOB Portfolio (Medical Office) | Norwich, CT | | — |
| | 403,000 |
| | 1,601,000 |
| | 10,000 |
| | 403,000 |
| | 1,611,000 |
| | 2,014,000 |
| | (146,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 12/16/16 | Norwich, CT | | — |
| | 403,000 |
| | 1,601,000 |
| | 730,000 |
| | 403,000 |
| | 2,331,000 |
| | 2,734,000 |
| | (237,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 12/16/16 |
| | Norwich, CT | | — |
| | 804,000 |
| | 12,094,000 |
| | 108,000 |
| | 804,000 |
| | 12,202,000 |
| | 13,006,000 |
| | (820,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 12/16/16 | Norwich, CT | | — |
| | 804,000 |
| | 12,094,000 |
| | 318,000 |
| | 804,000 |
| | 12,412,000 |
| | 13,216,000 |
| | (1,228,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 12/16/16 |
| New London CT MOB (Medical Office) | New London, CT | | — |
| | 669,000 |
| | 3,479,000 |
| | 242,000 |
| | 669,000 |
| | 3,721,000 |
| | 4,390,000 |
| | (281,000 | ) | | 1987 |
| | 05/03/17 | New London, CT | | — |
| | 669,000 |
| | 3,479,000 |
| | 289,000 |
| | 669,000 |
| | 3,768,000 |
| | 4,437,000 |
| | (474,000 | ) | | 1987 |
| | 05/03/17 |
| Middletown OH MOB II (Medical Office) | Middletown, OH | | — |
| | — |
| | 3,949,000 |
| | 22,000 |
| | — |
| | 3,971,000 |
| | 3,971,000 |
| | (138,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/20/17 | Middletown, OH | | — |
| | — |
| | 3,949,000 |
| | 86,000 |
| | — |
| | 4,035,000 |
| | 4,035,000 |
| | (280,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/20/17 |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
| Owen Valley Health Campus | Spencer, IN | | $ | 9,278,000 |
| | $ | 307,000 |
| | $ | 9,111,000 |
| | $ | 161,000 |
| | $ | 307,000 |
| | $ | 9,272,000 |
| | $ | 9,579,000 |
| | $ | (756,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 12/01/15 | Spencer, IN | | $ | 9,112,000 |
| | $ | 307,000 |
| | $ | 9,111,000 |
| | $ | 257,000 |
| | $ | 307,000 |
| | $ | 9,368,000 |
| | $ | 9,675,000 |
| | $ | (1,007,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Homewood Health Campus | Lebanon, IN | | 9,309,000 |
| | 973,000 |
| | 9,702,000 |
| | 423,000 |
| | 1,040,000 |
| | 10,058,000 |
| | 11,098,000 |
| | (820,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 12/01/15 | Lebanon, IN | | 9,143,000 |
| | 973,000 |
| | 9,702,000 |
| | 480,000 |
| | 1,040,000 |
| | 10,115,000 |
| | 11,155,000 |
| | (1,106,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Ashford Place Health Campus | Shelbyville, IN | | 6,483,000 |
| | 664,000 |
| | 12,662,000 |
| | 605,000 |
| | 682,000 |
| | 13,249,000 |
| | 13,931,000 |
| | (1,055,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/01/15 | Shelbyville, IN | | 6,327,000 |
| | 664,000 |
| | 12,662,000 |
| | 734,000 |
| | 682,000 |
| | 13,378,000 |
| | 14,060,000 |
| | (1,431,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Mill Pond Health Campus | Greencastle, IN | | 7,671,000 |
| | 1,576,000 |
| | 8,124,000 |
| | 308,000 |
| | 1,576,000 |
| | 8,432,000 |
| | 10,008,000 |
| | (666,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/01/15 | Greencastle, IN | | 7,487,000 |
| | 1,576,000 |
| | 8,124,000 |
| | 447,000 |
| | 1,576,000 |
| | 8,571,000 |
| | 10,147,000 |
| | (905,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| St. Andrews Health Campus | Batesville, IN | | 4,840,000 |
| | 552,000 |
| | 8,213,000 |
| | 243,000 |
| | 619,000 |
| | 8,389,000 |
| | 9,008,000 |
| | (675,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/01/15 | Batesville, IN | | 4,723,000 |
| | 552,000 |
| | 8,213,000 |
| | 199,000 |
| | 619,000 |
| | 8,345,000 |
| | 8,964,000 |
| | (909,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Hampton Oaks Health Campus | Scottsburg, IN | | 6,814,000 |
| | 720,000 |
| | 8,145,000 |
| | 246,000 |
| | 777,000 |
| | 8,334,000 |
| | 9,111,000 |
| | (703,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/01/15 | Scottsburg, IN | | 6,650,000 |
| | 720,000 |
| | 8,145,000 |
| | 352,000 |
| | 837,000 |
| | 8,380,000 |
| | 9,217,000 |
| | (943,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Forest Park Health Campus | Richmond, IN | | 7,441,000 |
| | 535,000 |
| | 9,399,000 |
| | 284,000 |
| | 535,000 |
| | 9,683,000 |
| | 10,218,000 |
| | (817,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/01/15 | Richmond, IN | | 7,262,000 |
| | 535,000 |
| | 9,399,000 |
| | 404,000 |
| | 535,000 |
| | 9,803,000 |
| | 10,338,000 |
| | (1,088,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| The Maples at Waterford Crossing | Goshen, IN | | 6,165,000 |
| | 344,000 |
| | 8,027,000 |
| | 51,000 |
| | 347,000 |
| | 8,075,000 |
| | 8,422,000 |
| | (658,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/01/15 | Goshen, IN | | 6,055,000 |
| | 344,000 |
| | 8,027,000 |
| | 48,000 |
| | 347,000 |
| | 8,072,000 |
| | 8,419,000 |
| | (873,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Morrison Woods Health Campus | Muncie, IN | | 6,400,000 |
| | 1,526,000 |
| | 10,144,000 |
| | 11,414,000 |
| | 1,526,000 |
| | 21,558,000 |
| | 23,084,000 |
| | (856,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/01/15 and 09/14/16 | Muncie, IN | | (c) |
| | 1,526,000 |
| | 10,144,000 |
| | 78,000 |
| | 1,261,000 |
| | 10,487,000 |
| | 11,748,000 |
| | (1,406,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/01/15 and 09/14/16 |
| Woodbridge Health Campus | Logansport, IN | | 8,818,000 |
| | 228,000 |
| | 11,812,000 |
| | 307,000 |
| | 233,000 |
| | 12,114,000 |
| | 12,347,000 |
| | (979,000 | ) | | 2003 |
| | 12/01/15 | Logansport, IN | | 8,661,000 |
| | 228,000 |
| | 11,812,000 |
| | 284,000 |
| | 233,000 |
| | 12,091,000 |
| | 12,324,000 |
| | (1,312,000 | ) | | 2003 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Bridgepointe Health Campus | Vincennes, IN | | 7,545,000 |
| | 572,000 |
| | 7,469,000 |
| | 304,000 |
| | 572,000 |
| | 7,773,000 |
| | 8,345,000 |
| | (611,000 | ) | | 2002 |
| | 12/01/15 | Vincennes, IN | | 7,412,000 |
| | 572,000 |
| | 7,469,000 |
| | 436,000 |
| | 651,000 |
| | 7,826,000 |
| | 8,477,000 |
| | (840,000 | ) | | 2002 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Greenleaf Living Center | Elkhart, IN | | 12,061,000 |
| | 492,000 |
| | 12,157,000 |
| | 172,000 |
| | 502,000 |
| | 12,319,000 |
| | 12,821,000 |
| | (1,003,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 12/01/15 | Elkhart, IN | | 11,851,000 |
| | 492,000 |
| | 12,157,000 |
| | 295,000 |
| | 511,000 |
| | 12,433,000 |
| | 12,944,000 |
| | (1,336,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Scenic Hills Care Center | Ferdinand, IN | | 7,854,000 |
| | 212,000 |
| | 5,702,000 |
| | (4,046,000 | ) | | 212,000 |
| | 1,656,000 |
| | 1,868,000 |
| | (43,000 | ) | | 1985 |
| | 12/01/15 | Ferdinand, IN | | — |
| | 212,000 |
| | 5,702,000 |
| | (4,129,000 | ) | | — |
| | 1,785,000 |
| | 1,785,000 |
| | — |
| | 1985 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Forest Glen Health Campus | Springfield, OH | | 10,790,000 |
| | 846,000 |
| | 12,754,000 |
| | 195,000 |
| | 875,000 |
| | 12,920,000 |
| | 13,795,000 |
| | (1,087,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/01/15 | Springfield, OH | | 10,531,000 |
| | 846,000 |
| | 12,754,000 |
| | 303,000 |
| | 875,000 |
| | 13,028,000 |
| | 13,903,000 |
| | (1,427,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| The Meadows of Kalida Health Campus | Kalida, OH | | 8,344,000 |
| | 298,000 |
| | 7,628,000 |
| | 95,000 |
| | 303,000 |
| | 7,718,000 |
| | 8,021,000 |
| | (628,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/01/15 | Kalida, OH | | 8,196,000 |
| | 298,000 |
| | 7,628,000 |
| | 127,000 |
| | 303,000 |
| | 7,750,000 |
| | 8,053,000 |
| | (839,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| The Heritage | Findlay, OH | | 13,999,000 |
| | 1,312,000 |
| | 13,475,000 |
| | 316,000 |
| | 1,369,000 |
| | 13,734,000 |
| | 15,103,000 |
| | (1,131,000 | ) | | 1975 |
| | 12/01/15 | Findlay, OH | | 13,703,000 |
| | 1,312,000 |
| | 13,475,000 |
| | 356,000 |
| | 1,382,000 |
| | 13,761,000 |
| | 15,143,000 |
| | (1,517,000 | ) | | 1975 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Genoa Retirement Village | Genoa, OH | | 8,757,000 |
| | 881,000 |
| | 8,113,000 |
| | 286,000 |
| | 909,000 |
| | 8,371,000 |
| | 9,280,000 |
| | (695,000 | ) | | 1985 |
| | 12/01/15 | Genoa, OH | | 8,601,000 |
| | 881,000 |
| | 8,113,000 |
| | 604,000 |
| | 909,000 |
| | 8,689,000 |
| | 9,598,000 |
| | (942,000 | ) | | 1985 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| The Residence of Waterford Crossing | Goshen, IN | | 8,869,000 |
| | 344,000 |
| | 4,381,000 |
| | 763,000 |
| | 349,000 |
| | 5,139,000 |
| | 5,488,000 |
| | (437,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/01/15 | |
| Waterford Crossing | | Goshen, IN | | 8,625,000 |
| | 344,000 |
| | 4,381,000 |
| | 809,000 |
| | 350,000 |
| | 5,184,000 |
| | 5,534,000 |
| | (580,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| St. Elizabeth Healthcare | Delphi, IN | | 8,715,000 |
| | 522,000 |
| | 5,463,000 |
| | 5,361,000 |
| | 613,000 |
| | 10,733,000 |
| | 11,346,000 |
| | (531,000 | ) | | 1986 |
| | 12/01/15 | Delphi, IN | | 9,394,000 |
| | 522,000 |
| | 5,463,000 |
| | 5,293,000 |
| | 625,000 |
| | 10,653,000 |
| | 11,278,000 |
| | (864,000 | ) | | 1986 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Cumberland Pointe | | West Lafayette, IN | | 9,979,000 |
| | 1,645,000 |
| | 13,696,000 |
| | 573,000 |
| | 1,901,000 |
| | 14,013,000 |
| | 15,914,000 |
| | (1,649,000 | ) | | 1980 |
| | 12/01/15 |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
| Cumberland Pointe | West Lafayette, IN | | $ | 10,221,000 |
| | $ | 1,645,000 |
| | $ | 13,696,000 |
| | $ | 462,000 |
| | $ | 1,901,000 |
| | $ | 13,902,000 |
| | $ | 15,803,000 |
| | $ | (1,204,000 | ) | | 1980 |
| | 12/01/15 | |
| Franciscan Healthcare Center | Louisville, KY | | 11,463,000 |
| | 808,000 |
| | 8,439,000 |
| | 691,000 |
| | 812,000 |
| | 9,126,000 |
| | 9,938,000 |
| | (797,000 | ) | | 1975 |
| | 12/01/15 | Louisville, KY | | $ | 11,191,000 |
| | $ | 808,000 |
| | $ | 8,439,000 |
| | $ | 949,000 |
| | $ | 815,000 |
| | $ | 9,381,000 |
| | $ | 10,196,000 |
| | $ | (1,087,000 | ) | | 1975 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Blair Ridge Health Campus | Peru, IN | | 8,140,000 |
| | 734,000 |
| | 11,648,000 |
| | 422,000 |
| | 760,000 |
| | 12,044,000 |
| | 12,804,000 |
| | (1,115,000 | ) | | 2001 |
| | 12/01/15 | Peru, IN | | 7,996,000 |
| | 734,000 |
| | 11,648,000 |
| | 544,000 |
| | 773,000 |
| | 12,153,000 |
| | 12,926,000 |
| | (1,501,000 | ) | | 2001 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Glen Oaks Health Campus | New Castle, IN | | 5,557,000 |
| | 384,000 |
| | 8,189,000 |
| | 48,000 |
| | 384,000 |
| | 8,237,000 |
| | 8,621,000 |
| | (650,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 12/01/15 | New Castle, IN | | 5,424,000 |
| | 384,000 |
| | 8,189,000 |
| | 184,000 |
| | 384,000 |
| | 8,373,000 |
| | 8,757,000 |
| | (866,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Covered Bridge Health Campus | Seymour, IN | | (c) |
| | 386,000 |
| | 9,699,000 |
| | 217,000 |
| | 472,000 |
| | 9,830,000 |
| | 10,302,000 |
| | (812,000 | ) | | 2002 |
| | 12/01/15 | Seymour, IN | | (c) |
| | 386,000 |
| | 9,699,000 |
| | 453,000 |
| | — |
| | 10,538,000 |
| | 10,538,000 |
| | (1,087,000 | ) | | 2002 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Stonebridge Health Campus | Bedford, IN | | 10,316,000 |
| | 1,087,000 |
| | 7,965,000 |
| | 518,000 |
| | 1,134,000 |
| | 8,436,000 |
| | 9,570,000 |
| | (683,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/01/15 | Bedford, IN | | 10,155,000 |
| | 1,087,000 |
| | 7,965,000 |
| | 380,000 |
| | 1,141,000 |
| | 8,291,000 |
| | 9,432,000 |
| | (920,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| RiverOaks Health Campus | Princeton, IN | | 15,403,000 |
| | 440,000 |
| | 8,953,000 |
| | 405,000 |
| | 466,000 |
| | 9,332,000 |
| | 9,798,000 |
| | (752,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/01/15 | Princeton, IN | | 15,155,000 |
| | 440,000 |
| | 8,953,000 |
| | 469,000 |
| | 466,000 |
| | 9,396,000 |
| | 9,862,000 |
| | (1,019,000 | ) | | 2004 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Park Terrace Health Campus | Louisville, KY | | (c) |
| | 2,177,000 |
| | 7,626,000 |
| | 989,000 |
| | 2,177,000 |
| | 8,615,000 |
| | 10,792,000 |
| | (731,000 | ) | | 1977 |
| | 12/01/15 | Louisville, KY | | (c) |
| | 2,177,000 |
| | 7,626,000 |
| | 1,166,000 |
| | 2,177,000 |
| | 8,792,000 |
| | 10,969,000 |
| | (1,002,000 | ) | | 1977 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Cobblestone Crossing | Terre Haute, IN | | (c) |
| | 1,462,000 |
| | 13,860,000 |
| | 5,614,000 |
| | 1,469,000 |
| | 19,467,000 |
| | 20,936,000 |
| | (1,483,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/01/15 | Terre Haute, IN | | (c) |
| | 1,462,000 |
| | 13,860,000 |
| | 5,669,000 |
| | 1,496,000 |
| | 19,495,000 |
| | 20,991,000 |
| | (2,011,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Creasy Springs Health Campus | Lafayette, IN | | 17,040,000 |
| | 2,111,000 |
| | 14,337,000 |
| | 5,814,000 |
| | 2,365,000 |
| | 19,897,000 |
| | 22,262,000 |
| | (1,528,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 12/01/15 | Lafayette, IN | | 16,770,000 |
| | 2,111,000 |
| | 14,337,000 |
| | 5,918,000 |
| | 2,393,000 |
| | 19,973,000 |
| | 22,366,000 |
| | (2,070,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Avalon Springs Health Campus | Valparaiso, IN | | 18,523,000 |
| | 1,542,000 |
| | 14,107,000 |
| | 100,000 |
| | 1,560,000 |
| | 14,189,000 |
| | 15,749,000 |
| | (1,159,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 12/01/15 | Valparaiso, IN | | 18,233,000 |
| | 1,542,000 |
| | 14,107,000 |
| | 130,000 |
| | 1,575,000 |
| | 14,204,000 |
| | 15,779,000 |
| | (1,539,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Prairie Lakes Health Campus | Noblesville, IN | | 9,372,000 |
| | 2,204,000 |
| | 13,227,000 |
| | 144,000 |
| | 2,210,000 |
| | 13,365,000 |
| | 15,575,000 |
| | (1,095,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 12/01/15 | Noblesville, IN | | 9,220,000 |
| | 2,204,000 |
| | 13,227,000 |
| | 317,000 |
| | 2,339,000 |
| | 13,409,000 |
| | 15,748,000 |
| | (1,456,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| RidgeWood Health Campus | Lawrenceburg, IN | | 14,528,000 |
| | 1,240,000 |
| | 16,118,000 |
| | 51,000 |
| | 1,261,000 |
| | 16,148,000 |
| | 17,409,000 |
| | (1,299,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 12/01/15 | Lawrenceburg, IN | | 14,295,000 |
| | 1,240,000 |
| | 16,118,000 |
| | 58,000 |
| | 1,261,000 |
| | 16,155,000 |
| | 17,416,000 |
| | (1,723,000 | ) | | 2009 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Westport Place Health Campus | Louisville, KY | | (c) |
| | 1,245,000 |
| | 9,946,000 |
| | 53,000 |
| | 1,262,000 |
| | 9,982,000 |
| | 11,244,000 |
| | (794,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 12/01/15 | Louisville, KY | | (c) |
| | 1,245,000 |
| | 9,946,000 |
| | 69,000 |
| | 1,261,000 |
| | 9,999,000 |
| | 11,260,000 |
| | (1,056,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Lakeland Rehab & Health Center | Milford, IN | | — |
| | 306,000 |
| | 2,727,000 |
| | (1,251,000 | ) | | 306,000 |
| | 1,476,000 |
| | 1,782,000 |
| | (38,000 | ) | | 1973 |
| | 12/01/15 | |
| Paddock Springs | | Warsaw, IN | | 8,528,000 |
| | 488,000 |
| | 2,727,000 |
| | 7,866,000 |
| | 654,000 |
| | 10,427,000 |
| | 11,081,000 |
| | (265,000 | ) | | 2019 |
| | 02/01/19 |
| Amber Manor Care Center | Petersburg, IN | | 5,919,000 |
| | 446,000 |
| | 6,063,000 |
| | 215,000 |
| | 483,000 |
| | 6,241,000 |
| | 6,724,000 |
| | (536,000 | ) | | 1990 |
| | 12/01/15 | Petersburg, IN | | 5,824,000 |
| | 446,000 |
| | 6,063,000 |
| | 251,000 |
| | 494,000 |
| | 6,266,000 |
| | 6,760,000 |
| | (718,000 | ) | | 1990 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| The Meadows of Leipsic Health Campus | Leipsic, OH | | (c) |
| | 1,242,000 |
| | 6,988,000 |
| | 384,000 |
| | 1,242,000 |
| | 7,372,000 |
| | 8,614,000 |
| | (626,000 | ) | | 1986 |
| | 12/01/15 | Leipsic, OH | | (c) |
| | 1,242,000 |
| | 6,988,000 |
| | 467,000 |
| | 1,242,000 |
| | 7,455,000 |
| | 8,697,000 |
| | (839,000 | ) | | 1986 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Springview Manor | Lima, OH | | (c) |
| | 260,000 |
| | 3,968,000 |
| | 87,000 |
| | 260,000 |
| | 4,055,000 |
| | 4,315,000 |
| | (341,000 | ) | | 1978 |
| | 12/01/15 | Lima, OH | | (c) |
| | 260,000 |
| | 3,968,000 |
| | 98,000 |
| | 265,000 |
| | 4,061,000 |
| | 4,326,000 |
| | (455,000 | ) | | 1978 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Willows at Bellevue | Bellevue, OH | | 17,350,000 |
| | 587,000 |
| | 15,575,000 |
| | 216,000 |
| | 613,000 |
| | 15,765,000 |
| | 16,378,000 |
| | (1,270,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/01/15 | Bellevue, OH | | 17,079,000 |
| | 587,000 |
| | 15,575,000 |
| | 596,000 |
| | 787,000 |
| | 15,971,000 |
| | 16,758,000 |
| | (1,705,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Briar Hill Health Campus | North Baltimore, OH | | (c) |
| | 673,000 |
| | 2,688,000 |
| | 363,000 |
| | 696,000 |
| | 3,028,000 |
| | 3,724,000 |
| | (259,000 | ) | | 1977 |
| | 12/01/15 | North Baltimore, OH | | (c) |
| | 673,000 |
| | 2,688,000 |
| | 391,000 |
| | 696,000 |
| | 3,056,000 |
| | 3,752,000 |
| | (360,000 | ) | | 1977 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Cypress Pointe Health Campus | | Englewood, OH | | (c) |
| | 921,000 |
| | 10,291,000 |
| | 4,136,000 |
| | 1,416,000 |
| | 13,932,000 |
| | 15,348,000 |
| | (1,130,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 12/01/15 |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
| Cypress Pointe Health Campus | Englewood, OH | | (c) |
| | $ | 921,000 |
| | $ | 10,291,000 |
| | $ | 833,000 |
| | $ | 1,416,000 |
| | $ | 10,629,000 |
| | $ | 12,045,000 |
| | $ | (845,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 12/01/15 | |
| The Oaks at NorthPointe Woods | Battle Creek, MI | | (c) |
| | 567,000 |
| | 12,716,000 |
| | 62,000 |
| | 567,000 |
| | 12,778,000 |
| | 13,345,000 |
| | (1,028,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/01/15 | Battle Creek, MI | | (c) |
| | $ | 567,000 |
| | $ | 12,716,000 |
| | $ | 109,000 |
| | $ | 567,000 |
| | $ | 12,825,000 |
| | $ | 13,392,000 |
| | $ | (1,366,000 | ) | | 2008 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| RidgeCrest Health Campus | Jackson, MI | | (c) |
| | 642,000 |
| | 6,194,000 |
| | 237,000 |
| | 797,000 |
| | 6,276,000 |
| | 7,073,000 |
| | (518,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 12/01/15 | Jackson, MI | | $ | — |
| | 642,000 |
| | 6,194,000 |
| | (297,000 | ) | | — |
| | 6,539,000 |
| | 6,539,000 |
| | — |
| | 2010 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Westlake Health Campus | Commerce, MI | | $ | 15,143,000 |
| | 815,000 |
| | 13,502,000 |
| | 27,000 |
| | 815,000 |
| | 13,529,000 |
| | 14,344,000 |
| | (1,096,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 12/01/15 | Commerce, MI | | 14,906,000 |
| | 815,000 |
| | 13,502,000 |
| | 49,000 |
| | 826,000 |
| | 13,540,000 |
| | 14,366,000 |
| | (1,455,000 | ) | | 2011 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Springhurst Health Campus | Greenfield, IN | | 21,044,000 |
| | 931,000 |
| | 14,114,000 |
| | 1,267,000 |
| | 1,814,000 |
| | 14,498,000 |
| | 16,312,000 |
| | (1,277,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/01/15 and 05/16/17 | Greenfield, IN | | 20,712,000 |
| | 931,000 |
| | 14,114,000 |
| | 1,496,000 |
| | 1,842,000 |
| | 14,699,000 |
| | 16,541,000 |
| | (1,809,000 | ) | | 2007 |
| | 12/01/15 and 05/16/17 |
| Glen Ridge Health Campus | Louisville, KY | | (c) |
| | 1,208,000 |
| | 9,771,000 |
| | 1,545,000 |
| | 1,306,000 |
| | 11,218,000 |
| | 12,524,000 |
| | (832,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/01/15 | Louisville, KY | | (c) |
| | 1,208,000 |
| | 9,771,000 |
| | 1,577,000 |
| | 1,320,000 |
| | 11,236,000 |
| | 12,556,000 |
| | (1,196,000 | ) | | 2006 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| St. Mary Healthcare | Lafayette, IN | | 5,560,000 |
| | 348,000 |
| | 2,710,000 |
| | 46,000 |
| | 348,000 |
| | 2,756,000 |
| | 3,104,000 |
| | (233,000 | ) | | 1969 |
| | 12/01/15 | Lafayette, IN | | 5,470,000 |
| | 348,000 |
| | 2,710,000 |
| | 41,000 |
| | 348,000 |
| | 2,751,000 |
| | 3,099,000 |
| | (297,000 | ) | | 1969 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| The Oaks at Woodfield | Grand Blanc, MI | | (c) |
| | 897,000 |
| | 12,270,000 |
| | 19,000 |
| | 897,000 |
| | 12,289,000 |
| | 13,186,000 |
| | (1,009,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 12/01/15 | Grand Blanc, MI | | (c) |
| | 897,000 |
| | 12,270,000 |
| | 66,000 |
| | 927,000 |
| | 12,306,000 |
| | 13,233,000 |
| | (1,338,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Stonegate Health Campus | Lapeer, MI | | (c) |
| | 538,000 |
| | 13,159,000 |
| | 50,000 |
| | 567,000 |
| | 13,180,000 |
| | 13,747,000 |
| | (1,091,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 12/01/15 | Lapeer, MI | | (c) |
| | 538,000 |
| | 13,159,000 |
| | 93,000 |
| | 567,000 |
| | 13,223,000 |
| | 13,790,000 |
| | (1,447,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Glen Oaks Senior Living at Forest Ridge | New Castle, IN | | (c) |
| | 204,000 |
| | 5,470,000 |
| | 51,000 |
| | 204,000 |
| | 5,521,000 |
| | 5,725,000 |
| | (454,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/01/15 | |
| Senior Living at Forest Ridge | | New Castle, IN | | (c) |
| | 204,000 |
| | 5,470,000 |
| | 72,000 |
| | 204,000 |
| | 5,542,000 |
| | 5,746,000 |
| | (604,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Highland Oaks Health Center | McConnelsville, OH | | — |
| | 880,000 |
| | 1,803,000 |
| | 302,000 |
| | 880,000 |
| | 2,105,000 |
| | 2,985,000 |
| | (178,000 | ) | | 1978 |
| | 12/01/15 | McConnelsville, OH | | (c) |
| | 880,000 |
| | 1,803,000 |
| | 564,000 |
| | 970,000 |
| | 2,277,000 |
| | 3,247,000 |
| | (253,000 | ) | | 1978 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| Richland Manor | Bluffton, OH | | — |
| | 224,000 |
| | 2,200,000 |
| | (2,057,000 | ) | | — |
| | 367,000 |
| | 367,000 |
| | (366,000 | ) | | 1940 |
| | 12/01/15 | Bluffton, OH | | — |
| | 224,000 |
| | 2,200,000 |
| | (2,200,000 | ) | | — |
| | 224,000 |
| | 224,000 |
| | — |
| | 1940 |
| | 12/01/15 |
| River Terrace Health Campus | Madison, IN | | 12,367,000 |
| | — |
| | 13,378,000 |
| | 2,101,000 |
| | — |
| | 15,479,000 |
| | 15,479,000 |
| | (1,180,000 | ) | | 2016 |
| | 03/28/16 | Madison, IN | | 11,650,000 |
| | — |
| | 13,378,000 |
| | 4,219,000 |
| | — |
| | 17,597,000 |
| | 17,597,000 |
| | (1,645,000 | ) | | 2016 |
| | 03/28/16 |
| St. Charles Health Campus | Jasper, IN | | 12,126,000 |
| | 467,000 |
| | 14,532,000 |
| | 737,000 |
| | 472,000 |
| | 15,264,000 |
| | 15,736,000 |
| | (1,150,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/24/16 and 06/30/16 | Jasper, IN | | 11,934,000 |
| | 467,000 |
| | 14,532,000 |
| | 828,000 |
| | 518,000 |
| | 15,309,000 |
| | 15,827,000 |
| | (1,589,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/24/16 and 06/30/16 |
| Bethany Pointe Health Campus | Anderson, IN | | 20,799,000 |
| | 2,337,000 |
| | 26,524,000 |
| | 1,377,000 |
| | 2,445,000 |
| | 27,793,000 |
| | 30,238,000 |
| | (2,031,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 06/30/16 | Anderson, IN | | 20,463,000 |
| | 2,337,000 |
| | 26,524,000 |
| | 1,518,000 |
| | 2,445,000 |
| | 27,934,000 |
| | 30,379,000 |
| | (2,881,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 06/30/16 |
| River Pointe Health Campus | Evansville, IN | | 14,937,000 |
| | 1,118,000 |
| | 14,736,000 |
| | 1,096,000 |
| | 1,122,000 |
| | 15,828,000 |
| | 16,950,000 |
| | (1,238,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 06/30/16 | Evansville, IN | | 14,698,000 |
| | 1,118,000 |
| | 14,736,000 |
| | 1,244,000 |
| | 1,126,000 |
| | 15,972,000 |
| | 17,098,000 |
| | (1,732,000 | ) | | 1999 |
| | 06/30/16 |
| Waterford Place Health Campus | Kokomo, IN | | 15,802,000 |
| | 1,219,000 |
| | 18,557,000 |
| | 1,144,000 |
| | 1,301,000 |
| | 19,619,000 |
| | 20,920,000 |
| | (1,469,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/30/16 | Kokomo, IN | | 15,553,000 |
| | 1,219,000 |
| | 18,557,000 |
| | 1,150,000 |
| | 1,306,000 |
| | 19,620,000 |
| | 20,926,000 |
| | (2,072,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/30/16 |
| Autumn Woods Health Campus | New Albany, IN | | (c) |
| | 1,016,000 |
| | 13,414,000 |
| | 1,359,000 |
| | 1,025,000 |
| | 14,764,000 |
| | 15,789,000 |
| | (1,226,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/30/16 | New Albany, IN | | (c) |
| | 1,016,000 |
| | 13,414,000 |
| | 1,416,000 |
| | 1,025,000 |
| | 14,821,000 |
| | 15,846,000 |
| | (1,711,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/30/16 |
| Oakwood Health Campus | Tell City, IN | | 9,701,000 |
| | 783,000 |
| | 11,880,000 |
| | 948,000 |
| | 791,000 |
| | 12,820,000 |
| | 13,611,000 |
| | (1,036,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/30/16 | Tell City, IN | | 9,547,000 |
| | 783,000 |
| | 11,880,000 |
| | 1,079,000 |
| | 874,000 |
| | 12,868,000 |
| | 13,742,000 |
| | (1,460,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 06/30/16 |
| Cedar Ridge Health Campus | Cynthiana, KY | | (c) |
| | 102,000 |
| | 8,435,000 |
| | 3,418,000 |
| | 139,000 |
| | 11,816,000 |
| | 11,955,000 |
| | (828,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 06/30/16 | Cynthiana, KY | | (c) |
| | 102,000 |
| | 8,435,000 |
| | 3,504,000 |
| | 139,000 |
| | 11,902,000 |
| | 12,041,000 |
| | (1,309,000 | ) | | 2005 |
| | 06/30/16 |
| Aspen Place Health Campus | | Greensburg, IN | | 9,838,000 |
| | 980,000 |
| | 10,970,000 |
| | 682,000 |
| | 1,016,000 |
| | 11,616,000 |
| | 12,632,000 |
| | (1,169,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 08/16/16 |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
| Aspen Place Health Campus | Greensburg, IN | | $ | 9,968,000 |
| | $ | 980,000 |
| | $ | 10,970,000 |
| | $ | 666,000 |
| | $ | 1,014,000 |
| | $ | 11,602,000 |
| | $ | 12,616,000 |
| | $ | (811,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 08/16/16 | |
| The Willows at Citation | Lexington, KY | | (c) |
| | 826,000 |
| | 10,017,000 |
| | 583,000 |
| | 844,000 |
| | 10,582,000 |
| | 11,426,000 |
| | (751,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 08/16/16 | Lexington, KY | | (c) |
| | $ | 826,000 |
| | $ | 10,017,000 |
| | $ | 588,000 |
| | $ | 844,000 |
| | $ | 10,587,000 |
| | $ | 11,431,000 |
| | $ | (1,066,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 08/16/16 |
| The Willows at East Lansing | East Lansing, MI | | 17,225,000 |
| | 1,449,000 |
| | 15,161,000 |
| | 1,235,000 |
| | 1,508,000 |
| | 16,337,000 |
| | 17,845,000 |
| | (1,283,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 08/16/16 | East Lansing, MI | | $ | 17,000,000 |
| | 1,449,000 |
| | 15,161,000 |
| | 1,268,000 |
| | 1,496,000 |
| | 16,382,000 |
| | 17,878,000 |
| | (1,779,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 08/16/16 |
| The Willows at Howell | Howell, MI | | (c) |
| | 1,051,000 |
| | 12,099,000 |
| | 1,295,000 |
| | 1,079,000 |
| | 13,366,000 |
| | 14,445,000 |
| | (987,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 08/16/16 | Howell, MI | | (c) |
| | 1,051,000 |
| | 12,099,000 |
| | 5,125,000 |
| | 1,079,000 |
| | 17,196,000 |
| | 18,275,000 |
| | (1,394,000 | ) | | 2015 |
| | 08/16/16 |
| The Willows at Okemos | Okemos, MI | | 7,895,000 |
| | 1,171,000 |
| | 12,326,000 |
| | 788,000 |
| | 1,210,000 |
| | 13,075,000 |
| | 14,285,000 |
| | (1,109,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 08/16/16 | Okemos, MI | | 7,792,000 |
| | 1,171,000 |
| | 12,326,000 |
| | 785,000 |
| | 1,210,000 |
| | 13,072,000 |
| | 14,282,000 |
| | (1,515,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 08/16/16 |
| Shelby Crossing Health Campus | Shelby Township, MI | | 18,102,000 |
| | 2,533,000 |
| | 18,440,000 |
| | 1,936,000 |
| | 2,588,000 |
| | 20,321,000 |
| | 22,909,000 |
| | (1,632,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 08/16/16 | Macomb, MI | | 17,866,000 |
| | 2,533,000 |
| | 18,440,000 |
| | 1,964,000 |
| | 2,612,000 |
| | 20,325,000 |
| | 22,937,000 |
| | (2,354,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 08/16/16 |
| Village Green Healthcare Center | Greenville, OH | | 7,337,000 |
| | 355,000 |
| | 9,696,000 |
| | 375,000 |
| | 373,000 |
| | 10,053,000 |
| | 10,426,000 |
| | (708,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 08/16/16 | Greenville, OH | | 7,241,000 |
| | 355,000 |
| | 9,696,000 |
| | 404,000 |
| | 373,000 |
| | 10,082,000 |
| | 10,455,000 |
| | (1,010,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 08/16/16 |
| The Oaks at Northpointe | Zanesville, OH | | (c) |
| | 624,000 |
| | 11,665,000 |
| | 940,000 |
| | 650,000 |
| | 12,579,000 |
| | 13,229,000 |
| | (957,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 08/16/16 | Zanesville, OH | | (c) |
| | 624,000 |
| | 11,665,000 |
| | 940,000 |
| | 650,000 |
| | 12,579,000 |
| | 13,229,000 |
| | (1,352,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 08/16/16 |
| The Oaks at Berthesda | Zanesville, OH | | 4,790,000 |
| | 714,000 |
| | 10,791,000 |
| | 633,000 |
| | 743,000 |
| | 11,395,000 |
| | 12,138,000 |
| | (833,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 08/16/16 | |
| The Oaks at Bethesda | | Zanesville, OH | | 4,728,000 |
| | 714,000 |
| | 10,791,000 |
| | 671,000 |
| | 743,000 |
| | 11,433,000 |
| | 12,176,000 |
| | (1,185,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 08/16/16 |
| White Oak Health Campus | Monticello, IN | | 2,687,000 |
| | — |
| | 3,559,000 |
| | 463,000 |
| | 225,000 |
| | 3,797,000 |
| | 4,022,000 |
| | (357,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 09/23/16 | Monticello, IN | | 2,637,000 |
| | — |
| | 3,559,000 |
| | 717,000 |
| | 296,000 |
| | 3,980,000 |
| | 4,276,000 |
| | (512,000 | ) | | 2010 |
| | 09/23/16 |
| Woodmont Health Campus | Boonville, IN | | 8,223,000 |
| | 790,000 |
| | 9,633,000 |
| | 757,000 |
| | 809,000 |
| | 10,371,000 |
| | 11,180,000 |
| | (879,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 02/01/17 | Boonville, IN | | 8,117,000 |
| | 790,000 |
| | 9,633,000 |
| | 859,000 |
| | 880,000 |
| | 10,402,000 |
| | 11,282,000 |
| | (1,192,000 | ) | | 2000 |
| | 02/01/17 |
| Silver Oaks Health Campus | Columbus, IN | | (c) |
| | 1,776,000 |
| | 21,420,000 |
| | 873,000 |
| | 1,854,000 |
| | 22,215,000 |
| | 24,069,000 |
| | (1,917,000 | ) | | 2001 |
| | 02/01/17 | Columbus, IN | | (c) |
| | 1,776,000 |
| | 21,420,000 |
| | 1,261,000 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 24,456,000 |
| | 24,457,000 |
| | (2,605,000 | ) | | 2001 |
| | 02/01/17 |
| Thornton Terrace Health Campus | Hanover, IN | | 5,828,000 |
| | 764,000 |
| | 9,209,000 |
| | 471,000 |
| | 817,000 |
| | 9,627,000 |
| | 10,444,000 |
| | (810,000 | ) | | 2003 |
| | 02/01/17 | Hanover, IN | | 5,753,000 |
| | 764,000 |
| | 9,209,000 |
| | 579,000 |
| | 820,000 |
| | 9,732,000 |
| | 10,552,000 |
| | (1,084,000 | ) | | 2003 |
| | 02/01/17 |
| The Willows at Hamburg | Lexington, KY | | 12,135,000 |
| | 1,740,000 |
| | 13,422,000 |
| | 460,000 |
| | 1,775,000 |
| | 13,847,000 |
| | 15,622,000 |
| | (787,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 02/01/17 | Lexington, KY | | 11,978,000 |
| | 1,740,000 |
| | 13,422,000 |
| | 487,000 |
| | 1,775,000 |
| | 13,874,000 |
| | 15,649,000 |
| | (1,190,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 02/01/17 |
| The Lakes at Monclova | Maumee, OH | | 13,252,000 |
| | 1,880,000 |
| | 12,855,000 |
| | 1,283,000 |
| | 1,917,000 |
| | 14,101,000 |
| | 16,018,000 |
| | (926,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 02/01/17 | Monclova, OH | | 13,082,000 |
| | 2,869,000 |
| | 12,855,000 |
| | 1,744,000 |
| | 2,913,000 |
| | 14,555,000 |
| | 17,468,000 |
| | (1,379,000 | ) | | 2013 |
| | 02/01/17 |
| The Willows at Willard | Willard, OH | | (c) |
| | 610,000 |
| | 12,256,000 |
| | 2,498,000 |
| | 622,000 |
| | 14,742,000 |
| | 15,364,000 |
| | (1,018,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 02/01/17 | Willard, OH | | (c) |
| | 610,000 |
| | 12,256,000 |
| | 5,033,000 |
| | — |
| | 17,899,000 |
| | 17,899,000 |
| | (1,525,000 | ) | | 2012 |
| | 02/01/17 |
| Trilogy Real Estate Lowell, LLC | Lowell, IN | | — |
| | 304,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 304,000 |
| | — |
| | 304,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 06/07/17 | |
| Cedar Creek Health Campus | | Lowell, IN | | — |
| | 304,000 |
| | — |
| | (304,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 06/07/17 |
| Trilogy Healthcare of Pickerington, LLC | Pickerington, OH | | — |
| | 756,000 |
| | — |
| | 5,551,000 |
| | 771,000 |
| | 5,536,000 |
| | 6,307,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11/03/17 | Pickerington, OH | | — |
| | 756,000 |
| | — |
| | 15,487,000 |
| | 778,000 |
| | 15,465,000 |
| | 16,243,000 |
| | (67,000 | ) | | 2019 |
| | 10/01/19 |
| Trilogy Healthcare of Milford, LLC | Milford, IN | | 4,962,000 |
| | 488,000 |
| | — |
| | 10,792,000 |
| | 488,000 |
| | 10,792,000 |
| | 11,280,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11/14/17 | |
| Lakeland Rehab and Health Center | | Milford, IN | | — |
| | 306,000 |
| | 2,727,000 |
| | (1,292,000 | ) | | — |
| | 1,741,000 |
| | 1,741,000 |
| | — |
| | 1973 |
| | 12/01/15 |
Westlake Health Campus — Commerce Villa | | Commerce, MI | | (c) |
| | 261,000 |
| | 6,610,000 |
| | 937,000 |
| | 268,000 |
| | 7,540,000 |
| | 7,808,000 |
| | (477,000 | ) | | 2017 |
| | 11/17/17 |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | | | | | | Initial Cost to Company | | | | Gross Amount of Which Carried at Close of Period(f) | | | | |
| Description(a) | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired | Description(a) | | Encumbrances | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition(b) | | Land | | Buildings and Improvements | | Total(e) | | Accumulated Depreciation (g)(h) | | Date of Construction | | Date Acquired |
Westlake Health Campus — Commerce Villa | Commerce, MI | | (c) |
| | $ | 261,000 |
| | $ | 6,610,000 |
| | $ | 928,000 |
| | $ | 268,000 |
| | $ | 7,531,000 |
| | $ | 7,799,000 |
| | $ | (234,000 | ) | | 2017 |
| | 11/17/17 | |
| Orchard Grove Health Campus | Romeo, MI | | $ | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,219,000 |
| | 1,219,000 |
| | — |
| | 1,219,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11/30/17 | Romeo, MI | | $ | 15,132,000 |
| | $ | 2,065,000 |
| | $ | 11,510,000 |
| | $ | 4,032,000 |
| | $ | 3,284,000 |
| | $ | 14,323,000 |
| | $ | 17,607,000 |
| | $ | (989,000 | ) | | 2016 |
| | 11/30/17 |
| The Meadows of Ottawa | Ottawa, OH | | (c) |
| | 616,000 |
| | 7,752,000 |
| | 320,000 |
| | 629,000 |
| | 8,059,000 |
| | 8,688,000 |
| | (314,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 12/15/17 | Ottawa, OH | | (c) |
| | 616,000 |
| | 7,752,000 |
| | 324,000 |
| | 629,000 |
| | 8,063,000 |
| | 8,692,000 |
| | (584,000 | ) | | 2014 |
| | 12/15/17 |
| Valley View Healthcare Center | Fremont, OH | | 10,266,000 |
| | 930,000 |
| | 7,635,000 |
| | 1,471,000 |
| | 1,089,000 |
| | 8,947,000 |
| | 10,036,000 |
| | (105,000 | ) | | 2017 |
| | 07/20/18 | Fremont, OH | | 10,266,000 |
| | 930,000 |
| | 7,635,000 |
| | 1,471,000 |
| | 1,089,000 |
| | 8,947,000 |
| | 10,036,000 |
| | (352,000 | ) | | 2017 |
| | 07/20/18 |
| Novi Lakes Health Campus | Novi, MI | | 10,327,000 |
| | 1,654,000 |
| | 7,494,000 |
| | 2,511,000 |
| | 1,661,000 |
| | 9,998,000 |
| | 11,659,000 |
| | (492,000 | ) | | 2016 |
| | 07/20/18 | Novi, MI | | 10,327,000 |
| | 1,654,000 |
| | 7,494,000 |
| | 2,637,000 |
| | 1,661,000 |
| | 10,124,000 |
| | 11,785,000 |
| | (870,000 | ) | | 2016 |
| | 07/20/18 |
| Orchard Grove Health Campus | Romeo, MI | | 15,132,000 |
| | 2,065,000 |
| | 11,510,000 |
| | 2,538,000 |
| | 2,065,000 |
| | 14,048,000 |
| | 16,113,000 |
| | (500,000 | ) | | 2016 |
| | 07/20/18 | |
| The Willows at Fritz Farm | Lexington, KY | | 11,775,000 |
| | 1,538,000 |
| | 8,637,000 |
| | 335,000 |
| | 1,546,000 |
| | 8,964,000 |
| | 10,510,000 |
| | (103,000 | ) | | 2017 |
| | 07/20/18 | Lexington, KY | | 11,775,000 |
| | 1,538,000 |
| | 8,637,000 |
| | 355,000 |
| | 1,551,000 |
| | 8,979,000 |
| | 10,530,000 |
| | (341,000 | ) | | 2017 |
| | 07/20/18 |
| Trilogy Real Estate Gahanna, LLC | Gahanna, Ohio | | — |
| | 1,146,000 |
| | — |
| | 963,000 |
| | 1,201,000 |
| | 908,000 |
| | 2,109,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10/23/18 | Gahanna, OH | | 4,809,000 |
| | 1,146,000 |
| | — |
| | 11,808,000 |
| | 1,201,000 |
| | 11,753,000 |
| | 12,954,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10/23/18 |
| Trilogy Real Estate of Kent, LLC | Byron Township, MI | | — |
| | 2,000,000 |
| | — |
| | 663,000 |
| | 2,007,000 |
| | 656,000 |
| | 2,663,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11/26/18 | Byron Center, MI | | 6,694,000 |
| | 2,000,000 |
| | — |
| | 12,299,000 |
| | 2,007,000 |
| | 12,292,000 |
| | 14,299,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11/26/18 |
| Morrison Woods Legacy & IL | | Muncie, IN | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,778,000 |
| | 584,000 |
| | 11,194,000 |
| | 11,778,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 02/01/19 |
| Ottawa Villa Land | | Ottawa, OH | | — |
| | 79,000 |
| | — |
| | 2,000 |
| | 81,000 |
| | — |
| | 81,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 06/21/19 |
| Harrison Springs Health Campus | | Corydon, IN | | (c) |
| | 1,653,000 |
| | 11,487,000 |
| | 2,000 |
| | 1,653,000 |
| | 11,489,000 |
| | 13,142,000 |
| | (145,000 | ) | | 2016 |
| | 09/04/19 |
| The Cloister at Silvercrest | | New Albany, IN | | — |
| | 139,000 |
| | 634,000 |
| | — |
| | 139,000 |
| | 634,000 |
| | 773,000 |
| | (4,000 | ) | | 1940 |
| | 10/01/19 |
| Trilogy Healthcare of Ferdinand II, LLC | | Ferdinand, IN | | 11,262,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,151,000 |
| | — |
| | 15,151,000 |
| | 15,151,000 |
| | (32,000 | ) | | 2019 |
| | 11/01/19 |
| | | $ | 712,132,000 |
| | $ | 182,463,000 |
| | $ | 2,035,301,000 |
| | $ | 115,954,000 |
| | $ | 187,999,000 |
| | $ | 2,145,719,000 |
| | $ | 2,333,718,000 |
| | $ | (208,309,000 | ) | | | | | $ | 816,217,000 |
| | $ | 187,582,000 |
| | $ | 2,063,920,000 |
| | $ | 192,932,000 |
| | $ | 189,817,000 |
| | $ | 2,254,617,000 |
| | $ | 2,444,434,000 |
| | $ | (274,094,000 | ) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Leased properties(d) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 71,365,000 |
| | $ | 62,750,000 |
| | $ | 1,150,000 |
| | $ | 132,965,000 |
| | $ | 134,115,000 |
| | $ | (46,315,000 | ) | | | | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 71,365,000 |
| | $ | 88,351,000 |
| | $ | 1,468,000 |
| | $ | 158,248,000 |
| | $ | 159,716,000 |
| | $ | (63,668,000 | ) | | | |
| Construction in progress | | 898,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,542,000 |
| | 297,000 |
| | 9,245,000 |
| | 9,542,000 |
| | (70,000 | ) | | | | | — |
| | 3,794,000 |
| | — |
| | 10,664,000 |
| | 4,206,000 |
| | 10,252,000 |
| | 14,458,000 |
| | (136,000 | ) | | | |
| | | $ | 713,030,000 |
| | $ | 182,463,000 |
| | $ | 2,106,666,000 |
| | $ | 188,246,000 |
| | $ | 189,446,000 |
| | $ | 2,287,929,000 |
| | $ | 2,477,375,000 |
| | $ | (254,694,000 | ) | | | | | $ | 816,217,000 |
| | $ | 191,376,000 |
| | $ | 2,135,285,000 |
| | $ | 291,947,000 |
| | $ | 195,491,000 |
| | $ | 2,423,117,000 |
| | $ | 2,618,608,000 |
| | $ | (337,898,000 | ) | | | |
________________
| |
| (a) | We own 100% of our properties as of December 31, 2018,2019, with the exception of Trilogy and Lakeview IN Medical Plaza. |
| |
| (b) | The cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition is shown inclusive of dispositions and impairments. |
| |
| (c) | These properties are used as collateral for the secured revolver portion of the 2019 Trilogy PropCo LineCredit Facility, which had an outstanding balance of Credit entered into on December 1, 2015. As$234,179,000 as of December 31, 2018, the outstanding balance was $170,518,000.2019. See Note 8, Lines of Credit and Term Loans — 2019 Trilogy Credit Facility, for a further discussion. |
| |
| (d) | Represents furniture, fixtures, equipment and improvements associated with properties under operating leases. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
| |
| (e) | The changes in total real estate for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017 are as follows: |
| | | | Amount | Amount |
| Balance — December 31, 2015 | $ | 1,704,998,000 |
| |
| Acquisitions | 487,114,000 |
| |
| Additions | 54,069,000 |
| |
| Dispositions | (1,420,000 | ) | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (11,005,000 | ) | |
| Balance — December 31, 2016 | $ | 2,233,756,000 |
| $ | 2,233,756,000 |
|
| Acquisitions | $ | 83,309,000 |
| 83,309,000 |
|
| Additions | 35,243,000 |
| 35,243,000 |
|
| Dispositions and impairments | (20,864,000 | ) | (20,864,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 4,764,000 |
| 4,764,000 |
|
| Balance — December 31, 2017 | $ | 2,336,208,000 |
| $ | 2,336,208,000 |
|
| Acquisitions | $ | 60,751,000 |
| $ | 60,751,000 |
|
| Additions | 87,061,000 |
| 87,061,000 |
|
| Dispositions and impairments | (4,142,000 | ) | (4,142,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (2,503,000 | ) | (2,503,000 | ) |
| Balance — December 31, 2018 | $ | 2,477,375,000 |
| $ | 2,477,375,000 |
|
| Acquisitions | | $ | 32,330,000 |
|
| Additions | | 114,078,000 |
|
| Dispositions | | (8,050,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | 2,875,000 |
|
| Balance — December 31, 2019 | | $ | 2,618,608,000 |
|
| |
| (f) | As of December 31, 2018,2019, the aggregate cost of our properties was $2,372,354,000$2,500,824,000 for federal income tax purposes. |
| |
| (g) | The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017 are as follows: |
| | | | Amount | Amount |
| Balance — December 31, 2015 | $ | 26,600,000 |
| |
| Additions | 68,708,000 |
| |
| Dispositions | (628,000 | ) | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 95,000 |
| |
| Balance — December 31, 2016 | $ | 94,775,000 |
| $ | 94,775,000 |
|
| Additions | $ | 81,743,000 |
| 81,743,000 |
|
| Dispositions | (3,574,000 | ) | (3,574,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 6,000 |
| 6,000 |
|
| Balance — December 31, 2017 | $ | 172,950,000 |
| $ | 172,950,000 |
|
| Additions | $ | 83,309,000 |
| $ | 83,309,000 |
|
| Dispositions | (1,603,000 | ) | (1,603,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 38,000 |
| 38,000 |
|
| Balance — December 31, 2018 | $ | 254,694,000 |
| $ | 254,694,000 |
|
| Additions | | $ | 90,914,000 |
|
| Dispositions | | (7,614,000 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | | (96,000 | ) |
| Balance — December 31, 2019 | | $ | 337,898,000 |
|
| |
| (h) | The cost of buildings and capital improvements is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and capital improvements, up to 50 years, and the cost of tenant improvements is depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or useful life, up to 34 years. The cost of furniture, fixtures and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful life, up to 2728 years. |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
EXHIBITS LIST
December 31, 20182019
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 20182019 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).
|
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| First Amendment, Waiver and Commitment IncreaseCredit Agreement by anddated as of January 25, 2019, among Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III Holdings, LP, Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc., Subsidiary Guarantors, Existing Lenders, New Lender, and certain subsidiaries, certain lender parties, Bank of America, N.A. and, KeyBank, National Association, dated August 3, 2017Citizens Bank, National Association, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and KeyBanc Capital Markets (included as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55434) filed August 9, 2017January 31, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
GRIFFIN-AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT III, INC.
EXHIBITS LIST — (Continued)
December 31, 20182019
|
| |
| First Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement dated as of September 5, 2019, among Trilogy RER, LLC, and certain subsidiaries of Trilogy RER, LLC, Trilogy OpCo, LLC and Trilogy Pro Services, LLC, KeyBank National Association and the other lenders which are parties thereto from time to time, CIT Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., Regions Capital Markets, Bank of America, N.A. and The Huntington National Bank (included as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55434) filed September 11, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| |
| Unconditional Guaranty of Payment dated as of September 5, 2019, by Trilogy Investors, LLC, Trilogy Healthcare Holdings, Inc., Trilogy Pro Services, LLC and Trilogy OpCo, LLC for the benefit of KeyBank National Association and the other lenders which are parties thereto from time to time, CIT Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., Regions Capital Markets, Bank of America, N.A. and The Huntington National Bank (included as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-55434) filed September 11, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference) |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| 101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document |
| | |
| 101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| | |
| 101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| | |
| 101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| | |
| 101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| | |
| 101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
_________
|
| |
| * | Filed herewith. |
| ** | Furnished herewith. In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | | |
| | | Griffin-American Healthcare REIT III, Inc. (Registrant) | |
| | | | | |
| By | | /s/ JEFFREY T. HANSON | | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
| | | Jeffrey T. Hanson | | |
| | | |
Date: March 21, 201926, 2020 | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
| By | | /s/ JEFFREY T. HANSON | | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
| | | Jeffrey T. Hanson | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | | | |
Date: March 21, 201926, 2020 | | |
| | | | | |
| By | | /s/ BRIAN S. PEAY | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | Brian S. Peay | | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | | | | |
Date: March 21, 201926, 2020 | | |
| | | | | |
| By | | /s/ DANNY PROSKY | | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director |
| | | Danny Prosky | | |
| | | | | |
Date: March 21, 201926, 2020 | | |
| | | | | |
| By | | /s/ HAROLD H. GREENE | | Director |
| | | Harold H. Greene | | |
| | | | | |
Date: March 21, 201926, 2020 | | |
| | | | | |
| By | | /s/ GERALD W. ROBINSON | | Director |
| | | Gerald W. Robinson | | |
| | | | | |
Date: March 21, 201926, 2020 | | |
| | | | | |
| By | | /s/ J. GRAYSON SANDERS | | Director |
| | | J. Grayson Sanders | | |
| | | | | |
Date: March 21, 201926, 2020 | | |
