0001569187 ahh:DelrayPlazaMember us-gaap:FinancialGuaranteeMember 2019-12-31
Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
FORM
10-K
 
☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 2019
or
◻☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 001-35908

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Maryland46-1214914
(State or Other Jurisdictionother jurisdiction of
Incorporation incorporation or Organization)
organization)
(IRSI.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
222 Central Park Avenue,Suite 2100 
Virginia Beach,Virginia23462
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code (757) Code: (757) 366-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Classeach classTrading Symbol(s) Name Of Each Exchange On Which Registeredof each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share AHHNew York Stock Exchange
6.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per shareAHHPrANew York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ◻    x No  ☒ ◻
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ◻    No  ☒ x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒x   No  ◻ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒x    No  ◻ 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☒ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large"large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”" "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and “smaller reporting company”"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer◻xAccelerated filer☒☐
    
Non-accelerated filer◻  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)☐Smaller reporting company◻☐
Emerging growth company☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ◻☐    No  ☒

As of June 30, 2016,28, 2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $443.0$861.5 million, based on the closing sales price of $13.74$16.55 per share as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. (For purposes of this calculation all of the registrant’s directors and executive officers are deemed affiliates of the registrant.)
As of February 28, 2017,20, 2020, the registrant had 37,588,27856,370,060 shares of common stock outstanding. In addition, as of February 20, 2020, Armada Hoffler, L.P., the registrant's operating partnership subsidiary (the "Operating Partnership"), had 21,272,962 common units of limited partnership interest ("OP Units") outstanding (other than OP Units held by the registrant). Based on the 56,370,060 shares of common stock and 21,272,962 OP Units held by limited partners other than the registrant, the registrant had a total common equity market capitalization of $1,444,936,639 as of February 20, 2020 (based on the closing sales price of $18.61 on the New York Stock Exchange on such date).

Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report. The registrant expects to file its Definitive Proxy Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2016.  

Table of Contents
2019.  

Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
 
Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20162019
 
Table of Contents
 
PART I 
Item 1. 
Business.
1
Item 1A. 
Risk Factors.
16
Item 1B. 
Unresolved Staff Comments.
4441
Item 2. 
Properties.
4441
Item 3. 
Legal Proceedings.
4441
Item 4. 
Mine Safety Disclosures.
4441
PART II 
Item 5. 
Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
4542
Item 6. 
Selected Financial Data.
4744
Item 7. 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
4945
Item 7A. 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
6662
Item 8. 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
6663
Item 9. 
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
6663
Item 9A. 
Controls and Procedures.
6763
Item 9B. 
Other Information.
6764
PART III 
Item 10. 
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
6765
Item 11. 
Executive Compensation.
6765
Item 12. 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
6765
Item 13. 
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
6865
Item 14. 
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
6865
PART IV 
Item 15. 
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
6866
Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary.
6866
Index to Exhibits
67
Signatures 
69





i
Table of Contents


SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this report, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “result”"anticipate," "believe," "expect," "intend," "may," "might," "plan," "estimate," "project," "should," "will," "result" and similar expressions, which do not relate solely to historical matters, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties, and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, or projected. We caution you that while forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs when we make them, they are not guarantees of future performance and are impacted by actual events when they occur after we make such statements. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.
 
Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data, or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise, and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:
adverse economic or real estate developments, either nationally or in the markets in which our properties are located;
our failure to develop the properties in our development pipeline successfully, on the anticipated timelinetimelines, or at the anticipated costs;
our failure to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness;
defaults on, early terminations of, or non-renewal of leases by tenants, including significant tenants;
bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant tenant or a substantial number of smaller tenants;
the inability of one or more mezzanine loan borrowers to repay mezzanine loans in accordance with their contractual terms;
difficulties in identifying or completing development, acquisition, or disposition opportunities;
our failure to successfully operate developed and acquired properties;
our failure to generate income in our general contracting and real estate services segment in amounts that we anticipate;
fluctuations in interest rates and increased operating costs;
our failure to obtain necessary outside financing on favorable terms or at all;
our inability to extend the maturity of or refinance existing debt or comply with the financial covenants in the agreements that govern our existing debt;
financial market fluctuations;
risks that affect the general retail environment or the market for office properties or multifamily units;
the competitive environment in which we operate;
decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates;

ii
Table of Contents

conflicts of interests with our officers and directors;
lack or insufficient amounts of insurance;

ii
Table of Contents

environmental uncertainties and risks related to adverse weather conditions and natural disasters;
other factors affecting the real estate industry generally;
our failure to maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”("REIT") for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
limitations imposed on our business and our ability to satisfy complex rules in order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and
changes in governmental regulations or interpretations thereof, such as real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates and taxation of REITs.REITs; and
potential negative impacts from the recent changes to the U.S. tax laws.
 
While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any obligationcaution investors not to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, of new information, data or methods, future events or other changes after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as required by applicable law. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements that are based on information currently available to us or the third parties making thethese forward-looking statements. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could impact our future results, performance, or transactions, see the risk factors described in Item 1A herein and in other documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”"SEC").
 


iii
Table of Contents


PARTI
Item 1.Business. 
 
Our Company
 
References to “we,” “our,” “us”"we," "our," "us," and “our company”"our company" refer to Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with our consolidated subsidiaries, including Armada Hoffler, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”"Operating Partnership"), of which we are the sole general partner.
 
We are a full servicefull-service real estate company with extensive experience developing, building, owning, and managing high-quality, institutional-grade office, retail, and multifamily properties in attractive markets primarily throughout the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern United States. In addition to the ownership of our operating property portfolio, we develop and build properties for our own account and through joint ventures between us and unaffiliated partners.partners and also invest in development projects through mezzanine lending arrangements. We also provide general contracting services to third parties. Our construction and development experience includes mid- and high-rise office buildings, retail strip malls, and retail power centers, multifamily apartment communities, hotels and conference centers, single- and multi-tenant industrial, distribution, and manufacturing facilities, educational, medical and special purpose facilities, government projects, parking garages, and mixed-use town centers. Our third-party construction contracts have included signature properties across the Mid-Atlantic region, such as the Inner Harbor East development in Baltimore, Maryland, including the Four Seasons Hotel and Legg Mason office tower, the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in Washington, D.C., and a $50$50.0 million proton therapy institute for Hampton University in Hampton, Virginia. Our construction company historically has been ranked among the “Top 400 General Contractors” nationwide by Engineering News Record and has been ranked among the “Top 50 Retail Contractors” by Shopping Center World.
 
We were formed on October 12, 2012 under the laws of the State of Maryland and are headquartered in Virginia Beach, Virginia. We elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2013. Substantially all of our assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted through, our Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we owned, through a combination of direct and indirect interests, 68.1%72.6% of the common units of limited partnership interest in our Operating Partnership (“("OP Units”Units").  
 
20162019Highlights
 
The following highlights our results of operations and significant transactions for the year ended December 31, 2016:2019: 
 
Net income attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders of $42.8$21.6 million, or $0.85$0.41 per diluted share, compared to $31.2$17.2 million, or $0.75$0.36 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.


Funds from operations (“FFO”attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders ("FFO") of $48.0$80.0 million, or $0.96$1.10 per diluted share, compared to $35.9$64.3 million, or $0.87$0.99 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.


Normalized FFOfunds from operations attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders ("Normalized FFO") of $50.9$85.1 million, or $1.01$1.17 per diluted share, compared to $38.7$66.5 million, or $0.93$1.03 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.


Property segment net operating income (“NOI”("NOI") of $67.9$102.0 million compared to $54.2$78.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015:2018:  


Office NOI of $13.4$21.1 million compared to $21.6$12.8 million  


Retail NOI of $42.0$58.0 million compared to $23.2$50.3 million 


•
Multifamily NOI of $22.9 million compared to $15.3 million
Multifamily NOI of $12.5 million compared to $9.3 million


Same store NOI of $35.6$71.1 million compared to $35.3$68.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015:2018:  


•
Office same store NOI of $13.5 million compared to $13.2 million

•
Retail same store NOI of $44.4 million compared to $43.4 million
Office same store NOI of $10.0 million compared to $9.9 million

Retail same store NOI of $18.7 million compared to $18.5 million


Multifamily same store NOI of $6.9$13.2 million compared to $6.9$11.9 million 


Core stabilizedStabilized portfolio occupancy by segment, excluding properties subject to ground leases, as of December 31, 20162019 compared to December 31, 2015:2018:


Office occupancy at 86.8%96.6% compared to 95.8%93.3%
•
Retail occupancy at 96.9% compared to 96.2%
•
Multifamily occupancy at 95.6% compared to 97.3%


RetailCore operating property portfolio occupancy at 95.8%96.5% as of December 31, 2019 compared to 95.5%
95.8% as of December 31, 2018.


Multifamily occupancy at 94.3% compared to 94.2%

Entered into a joint venture agreement as a minority partner to developCompleted the acquisition and refinancing of the commercial office and retail components of our One City Center a mixed-usedevelopment project located in downtown Durham, North Carolina. Upon completion, we will own 152,000 square feet of retail and office space anchored by a 55,000 square foot lease with Duke University.Carolina from the joint venture partnership.


Agreed to invest $42.0 million in The Residences at Annapolis Junction Town Center, located approximately two miles from Fort Meade, with optionsExercised our purchase option to acquire a 79% controlling interest uponin 1405 Point, the project's completion.17-story luxury high-rise apartment building located in the Harbor Point area of the Baltimore waterfront, in exchange for the Company's mezzanine loan investment and the assumption of existing debt.


Broke groundCompleted the acquisitions of Red Mill Commons and Marketplace at Hilltop in Virginia Beach, Virginia for aggregate consideration of $105.0 million, including $63.8 million in OP Units.

Completed the acquisition of Thames Street Wharf, a certified LEED Gold Class A trophy office building located on the next phasewaterfront in the Harbor Point development of developmentBaltimore, Maryland, for $101.0 million.

Completed the sale of Lightfoot Marketplace for $30.3 million, representing a 5.8% cap rate on in-place net operating income at the time of acquisition.

Introduced a redesigned website - ArmadaHoffler.com - to include additional functionality and enhancements including a new sustainability section.

Added $109.2 million to third-party construction backlog during the fourth quarter and ended 2019 with total backlog of $242.6 million.

Announced that Apex Entertainment has entered into a long-term lease for all 84,000 square feet previously occupied by Dick's Sporting Goods in the Town Center of Virginia Beach,Beach.

Announced that the Company will be the majority partner in a $42 millionjoint venture to develop Ten Tryon, a new 220,000 square foot urban mixed-use project expecteddevelopment anchored by a new Publix grocery store and a Fortune 100 office tenant in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Announced that the Company will be the majority partner in a joint venture to include 39,000 square feet of retail space, which is nearly 50% pre-leased as ofredevelop the date of this report, and more than 130 luxury apartments,historic Chronicle Mill as part of the Company's ongoing public-private partnership with the City of Virginia Beach.

Delivered both Lightfoot Marketplace in Williamsburg, Virginia and Johns Hopkins Village in Baltimore, Maryland.

Broke ground on Harding Place, a new $45multifamily development in Belmont, North Carolina.

Extended the maturity of our credit facility to 2024 for the senior unsecured revolving component and 2025 for the senior unsecured term loan component.

Raised $25.5 million Class A multifamily property in Midtown Charlotte, North Carolina with expected delivery in 2018.

Completed the dispositions of:

the Richmond Tower office building for $78.0 millionof gross proceeds through our at-the-market equity offering program at a gain of $26.2 million

Willowbrook Commons and Kroger Junction--two of the non-core retail centers acquired as part of the 11-asset portfolio purchase completed in January--for an aggregate salesweighted-average price of $12.9$18.30 per share during the quarter ended December 31, 2019. Raised $98.4 million

the Oyster Point office building for $6.4 million of gross proceeds at a gainweighted-average price of $3.8 million

Completed the acquisitions of:

a $170.5 million retail portfolio totaling 1.1 million square feet across 11 properties
Southgate Square in Colonial Heights, Virginia for total consideration of $39.5 million

Southshore Shops in Midlothian, Virginia for total consideration of $9.3 million

Columbus Village II in Virginia Beach, Virginia for total consideration of $26.2 million

Renaissance Square in Davidson, North Carolina for total consideration of $17.1 million

General contracting and real estate services segment gross profit of $5.7 million compared to $5.9 million for$16.76 per share during the year ended December 31, 2015.2019.

Executed $293.1 million of third-party construction contract work.

Third-party construction backlog of $217.7 million as of December 31, 2016.

Increased the borrowing capacity of our senior unsecured credit facility through the accordion feature. The facility is now comprised of a $150.0 million revolving credit facility and a $100.0 million term loan.



Raised $67.0$61.3 million of net proceeds before offering expenses through an underwritten public offering of 2.5 million shares of 6.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred Stock") at a weighted averagepublic offering price of $12.89$25.00 per share under our at-the-market continuous equity offering programs.share.

Cash from operating activities of $59.8 million, compared to $33.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.


Declared cash dividends of $0.72 per share compared to $0.68$0.84 per share for the year ended December 31, 2015.2019 compared to $0.80 per share for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Added to the MSCI U.S. REIT Index (RMZ) effective as of the close of the market on November 30, 2016. 

For definitions and discussion of FFO, Normalized FFO, NOI, and same store NOI, see the sections below entitled “Item"Item 6. Selected Financial Data”Data" and “Item"Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”"

 
Our Competitive Strengths
 
We believe that we distinguish ourselves from other REITs through the following competitive strengths:
 
•
High-Quality, Diversified Portfolio. Our portfolio consists of institutional-grade, premier office, retail, and multifamily properties located primarily in Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Our properties are generally in the top tier of commercial properties in their markets and offer Class-A amenities and finishes.  

•
Seasoned, Committed and Aligned Senior Management Team with a Proven Track Record. Our senior management team has extensive experience developing, constructing, owning, operating, renovating, and financing institutional-grade office, retail, multifamily, and hotel properties in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern regions. As of December 31, 2019, our named executive officers and directors collectively owned approximately 13% of our company on a fully diluted basis, which we believe aligns their interests with those of our stockholders. 
High-Quality, Diversified Portfolio. Our portfolio consists of institutional-grade, premier office, retail and multifamily properties located primarily in Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina and South Carolina. Our properties are generally in the top tier of commercial properties in their markets and offer Class-A amenities and finishes.  
•
Strategic Focus on Attractive Mid-Atlanticand SoutheasternMarkets. We focus our activities in our target markets in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern regions of the United States that demonstrate attractive fundamentals driven by favorable supply and demand characteristics and limited competition from other large, well-capitalized operators. We believe that our longstanding presence in our target markets provides us with significant advantages in sourcing and executing development opportunities, identifying and mitigating potential risks, and negotiating attractive pricing. 

•
Extensive Experience with Construction and Development. Our platform consists of development, construction, and asset management capabilities, which comprise an integrated delivery system for every project that we build for our own account or for third-party clients. This integrated approach provides a single source of accountability for design and construction, simplifies coordination and communication among the relevant stakeholders in each project, and provides us valuable insight from an operational perspective. We believe that being regularly engaged in construction and development projects provides us significant and distinct advantages, including enhanced market intelligence, greater insight into best practices, enhanced operating leverage, and "first look" access to development and ownership opportunities in our target markets. We also use mezzanine lending arrangements, which may enable us to acquire completed development projects at prices that are below market or at cost and may enable us to realize profit on projects we do not intend to own.


Seasoned, Committed and Aligned Senior Management Team with a Proven Track Record. Our senior management team has extensive experience developing, constructing, owning, operating, renovating and financing institutional-grade office, retail, multifamily and hotel properties in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern regions. As of December 31, 2016, our named executive officers and directors collectively owned approximately 18% of our company on a fully diluted basis, which we believe aligns their interests with those of our stockholders. 

Strategic Focus on Attractive Mid-Atlanticand SoutheasternMarkets. We focus our activities in our target markets in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern regions of the United States that demonstrate attractive fundamentals driven by favorable supply and demand characteristics and limited competition from other large, well-capitalized operators. We believe that our longstanding presence in our target markets provides us with significant advantages in sourcing and executing development opportunities, identifying and mitigating potential risks and negotiating attractive pricing. 

Extensive Experience with Construction and Development. Our platform consists of development, construction and asset management capabilities, which comprise an integrated delivery system for every project that we build for our own account or for third-party clients. This integrated approach provides a single source of accountability for design and construction, simplifies coordination and communication among the relevant stakeholders in each project and provides us valuable insight from an operational perspective. We believe that being regularly engaged in construction and development projects provides us significant and distinct advantages, including enhanced market intelligence, greater insight into best practices, enhanced operating leverage and “first look” access to development and ownership opportunities in our target markets. 

Longstanding Public and Private Relationships. We have extensive experience with public/private real estate development projects dating back to 1984, having worked with the Commonwealth of Virginia, the State of Georgia and the Kingdom of Sweden, as well as various municipalities. Through our experience and longstanding relationships with governmental entities such as these, we have learned to successfully navigate the often complex and time-consuming government approval process, which has given us the ability to capture opportunities that we believe many of our competitors are unable to pursue. 
•
Longstanding Public and Private Relationships. We have extensive experience with public/private real estate development projects dating back to 1984, having worked with the Commonwealth of Virginia, the State of Georgia, and the Kingdom of Sweden, as well as various municipalities. Through our experience and longstanding relationships with governmental entities such as these, we have learned to successfully navigate the often complex and time-consuming government approval process, which has given us the ability to capture opportunities that we believe many of our competitors are unable to pursue. 
 
Our Business and Growth Strategies
 
Our primary business objectives are to: (i) continue to develop, build, and own institutional-grade office, retail, and multifamily properties in our target markets, (ii) finance and operate our portfolio in a manner that increases cash flow and property values, (iii) execute new third-party construction work with consistent operating margins, and (iv) pursue selective acquisition opportunities, particularly when the acquisition involves a significant redevelopment aspect. We will seek to achieve our objectives through the following strategies: 


•
Pursue a Disciplined, Opportunistic Development and Acquisition Strategy Focused on Office, Retail, and Multifamily Properties. We intend to continue to grow our asset base through continued strategic development of office, retail, and multifamily properties, and the selective acquisition of high-quality properties that are well-located in their submarkets. Furthermore, we believe our construction and development expertise provides a high level of quality control while ensuring that the projects we construct and develop are completed more quickly and at a lower cost than if we engaged a third-party general contractor.
Pursue a Disciplined, Opportunistic Development and Acquisition Strategy Focused on Office, Retail and Multifamily Properties. We intend to grow our asset base through continued strategic development of office, retail and multifamily properties, and the selective acquisition of high-quality properties that are well-located in their submarkets. Furthermore, we believe our construction and development expertise provides a high level of quality control while ensuring that the projects we construct and develop are completed more quickly and at a lower cost than if we engaged a third-party general contractor.


•
Pursue New, and Expand Existing, Public/Private Relationships. We intend to continue to leverage our extensive experience in completing large, complex, mixed-use, public/private projects to establish relationships with new public partners while expanding our relationships with existing public partners.

•
Leverage our Construction and Development Platform to Attract Additional Third-Party Clients. We believe that we have a unique advantage over many of our competitors due to our integrated construction and development business that provides expertise, oversight, and a broad array of client-focused services. We intend to continue to conduct and grow our construction business and other third-party services by pursuing new clients and expanding our relationships with existing clients. We also intend to continue to use our mezzanine lending program to leverage our development and construction expertise in serving clients.
Pursue New, and Expand Existing, Public/Private Relationships. We intend to leverage our extensive experience in completing large, complex, mixed-use, public/private projects to establish relationships with new public partners while expanding our relationships with existing public partners.

Leverage our Construction and Development Platform to Attract Additional Third-Party Clients. We believe that we have a unique advantage over many of our competitors due to our integrated construction and development business that provides expertise, oversight and a broad array of client-focused services. We intend to continue to conduct and grow our construction business and other third-party services by pursuing new clients and expanding our relationships with existing clients.

Engage in Disciplined Capital Recycling. We intend to opportunistically divest properties when we believe returns have been maximized and to redeploy the capital into new development, acquisition, repositioning or redevelopment projects that are expected to generate higher potential risk-adjusted returns.

•
Engage in Disciplined Capital Recycling. We intend to opportunistically divest properties when we believe returns have been maximized and to redeploy the capital into new development, acquisition, repositioning, or redevelopment projects that are expected to generate higher potential risk-adjusted returns.

Our Properties
 
AsThe table below sets forth certain information regarding our stabilized portfolio as of December 31, 2016, our operating2019. We generally consider a property portfolio comprisedto be stabilized upon the following:   earlier of: (i) the quarter after the property reaches 80% occupancy or (ii) the thirteenth quarter after the property receives its certificate of occupancy. Additionally, any property that is fully or partially taken out of service for the purpose of redevelopment is no longer considered stabilized until the redevelopment activities are complete, the asset is placed back into service, and the stabilization criteria above are again met.
      Net Rentable     ABR per
Property 
Location  
 
Year Built 
 
Square Feet(1)  
 
Occupancy(2)  
 
ABR(3)  
 
Leased SF(3)  
Office Properties            
4525 Main Street Virginia Beach, VA 2014 237,893
 76.7% $5,096,663
 $27.93
Armada Hoffler Tower(4)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2002 324,242
 91.0
 8,178,573
 27.71
Commonwealth of Virginia – Chesapeake Chesapeake, VA 2015 36,227
 100.0
 645,927
 17.83
Commonwealth of Virginia – Virginia Beach Virginia Beach, VA 2015 11,139
 100.0
 245,058
 22.00
One Columbus Virginia Beach, VA 1984 129,272
 80.2
 2,582,506
 24.90
Two Columbus Virginia Beach, VA 2009 108,467
 76.5
 2,176,255
 26.24
Total / Weighted Average     847,240
 86.8% 18,924,982
 $26.59
Retail Properties            
249 Central Park Retail(5)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2004 91,366
 89.8
 $2,376,820
 $28.98
Alexander Pointe Salisbury, NC 1997 57,710
 97.6
 649,530
 11.53
Bermuda Crossroads Chester, VA 2001 111,566
 93.1
 1,519,843
 14.63
Broad Creek Shopping Center Norfolk, VA 1997/2001 227,659
 99.3
 3,188,069
 14.10
Broadmoor Plaza South Bend, IN 1980 115,059
 93.2
 1,267,990
 11.82
Brooks Crossing Newport News, VA 2016 18,343
 59.8
 151,380
 13.80
Columbus Village Virginia Beach, VA 1980/2013 66,594
 93.5
 1,200,454
 19.27
Columbus Village II Virginia Beach, VA 1995/1996 92,061
 100.0
 1,575,991
 17.12
Commerce Street Retail(6)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2008 19,173
 100.0
 848,540
 44.26
Courthouse 7-Eleven Virginia Beach, VA 2011 3,177
 100.0
 125,015
 39.35
Dick’s at Town Center Virginia Beach, VA 2002 103,335
 100.0
 1,231,340
 11.92
Dimmock Square Colonial Heights, VA 1998 106,166
 97.2
 1,736,216
 16.83
Fountain Plaza Retail Virginia Beach, VA 2004 35,961
 100.0
 1,022,629
 28.44
Gainsborough Square Chesapeake, VA 1999 88,862
 90.7
 1,220,121
 15.14
Greentree Shopping Center Chesapeake, VA 2014 15,751
 85.7
 285,941
 21.17
Hanbury Village Chesapeake, VA 2006/2009 61,049
 92.8
 1,355,478
 23.92
Harper Hill Commons Winston-Salem, NC 2004 55,394
 65.9
 518,400
 14.19
Harrisonburg Regal Harrisonburg, VA 1999 49,000
 100.0
 683,550
 13.95
Lightfoot Marketplace Williamsburg, VA 2016 56,043
 49.2
 601,665
 21.80
North Hampton Market Taylors, SC 2004 114,935
 97.2
 1,397,423
 12.51
North Point Center Durham, NC 1998/2009 215,690
 99.3
 2,583,835
 12.06
Oakland Marketplace Oakland, TN 2004 19,600
 85.7
 252,280
 15.02
Parkway Marketplace Virginia Beach, VA 1998 37,804
 95.2
 716,852
 19.91
Patterson Place Durham, NC 2004 160,942
 96.8
 2,443,501
 15.69
Perry Hall Marketplace Perry Hall, MD 2001 74,256
 100.0
 1,243,444
 16.75
Providence Plaza Charlotte, NC 2007/2008 103,118
 97.4
 2,564,010
 25.52
Renaissance Square Davidson, NC 2008 80,467
 92.2
 1,281,142
 17.26
Sandbridge Commons Virginia Beach, VA 2015 16,129
 100.0
 327,710
 20.32
Socastee Commons Myrtle Beach, SC 2000/2014 57,273
 97.4
 633,672
 11.36
South Retail Virginia Beach, VA 2002 38,515
 84.9
 879,870
 26.89
South Square Durham, NC 1977/2005 107,812
 100.0
 1,829,556
 16.97
Southgate Square Colonial Heights, VA 1991/2016 220,131
 96.3
 2,812,549
 13.27
Southshore Shops Midlothian, VA 2006 40,333
 93.1
 737,009
 19.63
Stone House Square Hagerstown, MD 2008 108,624
 90.4
 1,567,631
 15.96
Studio 56 Retail Virginia Beach, VA 2007 11,594
 100.0
 375,632
 32.40
Waynesboro Commons Waynesboro, VA 1993 52,415
 100.0
 438,464
 8.37
Wendover Village Greensboro, NC 2004 135,758
 100.0
 1,955,629
 14.41
Total / Weighted Average     2,969,665
 95.8% $45,599,181
 $16.21

      Net Rentable     ABR per
Property 
Location  
 
Year Built 
 
Square Feet(1)  
 
Occupancy(2)  
 
ABR(3)  
 
Leased SF(3)  
Retail Properties Subject to Ground Lease            
Bermuda Crossroads(7)
 Chester, VA 2001 11,000
 100.0% $163,350
 $14.85
Broad Creek Shopping Center(8)
 Norfolk, VA 1997/2001 24,818
 100.0
 607,081
 24.46
Greentree Shopping Center Chesapeake, VA 2014 5,088
 100.0
 230,004
 45.21
Hanbury Village(7)
 Chesapeake, VA 2006/2009 55,586
 100.0
 1,067,598
 19.21
Harper Hill Commons(7)
 Winston-Salem, NC 2004 41,520
 100.0
 373,680
 9.00
Lightfoot Marketplace(7)
 Williamsburg, VA 2016 51,750
 100.0
 660,771
 12.77
North Point Center(7)
 Durham, NC 1998/2009 280,556
 100.0
 1,083,666
 3.86
Oakland Marketplace(7)
 Oakland, TN 2004 45,000
 100.0
 186,300
 4.14
Sandbridge Commons(7)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2015 53,288
 100.0
 583,000
 10.94
South Square(7)
 Durham, NC 1977/2005 1,778
 100.0
 60,000
 33.75
Stone House Square(7)
 Hagerstown, MD 2008 3,650
 100.0
 165,000
 45.21
Tyre Neck Harris Teeter(8)
 Portsmouth, VA 2011 48,859
 100.0
 508,134
 10.40
Total / Weighted Average     622,893
 100.0% 5,688,584
 $9.13
Property Location   Year Built  Ownership Interest 
Net Rentable Square Feet (1)
 
Occupancy (2)
 
ABR (3)
 
ABR per Leased SF(3)
Retail Properties              
249 Central Park Retail Virginia Beach, VA 2004 100% 92,400
 97.9% $2,559,701
 $28.30
Alexander Pointe (4)
 Salisbury, NC 1997 100% 64,724
 95.7% 649,308
 10.49
Apex Entertainment (5)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2002 100% 103,335
 100.0% 1,471,503
 14.24
Bermuda Crossroads (4)
 Chester, VA 2001 100% 122,566
 98.4% 1,755,052
 14.56
Broad Creek Shopping Center(4)(6)
 Norfolk, VA 1997/2001 100% 121,504
 95.5% 2,071,357
 17.85
Broadmoor Plaza South Bend, IN 1980 100% 115,059
 97.5% 1,382,468
 12.32
Brooks Crossing Retail (7)
 Newport News, VA 2016 65% 18,349
 66.3% 169,740
 13.95
Columbus Village (4)
 Virginia Beach, VA 1980/2013 100% 62,362
 84.3% 1,556,163
 29.59
Columbus Village II Virginia Beach, VA 1995/1996 100% 92,061
 96.7% 1,595,334
 17.92
Commerce Street Retail (8)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2008 100% 19,173
 100.0% 881,292
 45.97
Courthouse 7-Eleven Virginia Beach, VA 2011 100% 3,177
 100.0% 139,311
 43.85
Dimmock Square Colonial Heights, VA 1998 100% 106,166
 97.2% 1,779,915
 17.25
Fountain Plaza Retail Virginia Beach, VA 2004 100% 35,961
 100.0% 1,028,958
 28.61
Gainsborough Square Chesapeake, VA 1999 100% 88,862
 95.6% 1,324,529
 15.59
Greentree Shopping Center Chesapeake, VA 2014 100% 15,719
 92.6% 293,359
 20.15
Hanbury Village (4)
 Chesapeake, VA 2006/2009 100% 116,635
 100.0% 2,538,926
 21.77
Harper Hill Commons (4)
 Winston-Salem, NC 2004 100% 96,914
 85.0% 928,028
 11.26
Harrisonburg Regal Harrisonburg, VA 1999 100% 49,000
 100.0% 717,850
 14.65
Indian Lakes Crossing (4)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2008 100% 64,973
 95.0% 845,097
 13.70
Lexington Square Lexington, SC 2017 100% 85,540
 98.2% 1,829,558
 21.78
Market at Mill Creek (4)(7)
 Mount Pleasant, SC 2018 70% 80,405
 93.8% 1,700,522
 22.55
Marketplace at Hilltop (4)(6)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2000/2001 100% 116,953
 100.0% 2,654,816
 22.70
North Hampton Market Taylors, SC 2004 100% 114,935
 100.0% 1,479,285
 12.87
North Point Center (4)
 Durham, NC 1998/2009 100% 494,746
 100.0% 3,842,617
 7.77
Oakland Marketplace (4)
 Oakland, TN 2004 100% 64,538
 100.0% 478,857
 7.42
Parkway Centre Moultrie, GA 2017 100% 61,200
 98.0% 812,760
 13.55
Parkway Marketplace Virginia Beach, VA 1998 100% 37,804
 94.4% 726,757
 20.36
Patterson Place Durham, NC 2004 100% 160,942
 94.3% 2,397,055
 15.79
Perry Hall Marketplace Perry Hall, MD 2001 100% 74,256
 100.0% 1,270,853
 17.11
Providence Plaza Charlotte, NC 2007/2008 100% 103,118
 98.8% 2,803,576
 27.53
Red Mill Commons (4)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2000-2005 100% 373,808
 96.5% 6,427,485
 17.81
Renaissance Square Davidson, NC 2008 100% 80,467
 90.4% 1,267,552
 17.43
Sandbridge Commons (4)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2015 100% 76,650
 98.5% 1,056,840
 14.00
Socastee Commons Myrtle Beach, SC 2000/2014 100% 57,273
 96.7% 632,797
 11.43
South Retail Virginia Beach, VA 2002 100% 38,515
 100.0% 992,999
 25.78
South Square (4)
 Durham, NC 1977/2005 100% 109,590
 98.1% 1,873,007
 17.42
Southgate Square Colonial Heights, VA 1991/2016 100% 260,131
 94.4% 3,365,533
 13.70
Southshore Shops Chesterfield, VA 2006 100% 40,307
 85.3% 720,087
 20.94
Stone House Square (4)
 Hagerstown, MD 2008 100% 112,274
 93.1% 1,784,568
 17.07
Studio 56 Retail Virginia Beach, VA 2007 100% 11,594
 100.0% 473,695
 40.86
Tyre Neck Harris Teeter (4)(6)
 Portsmouth, VA 2011 100% 48,859
 100.0% 533,285
 10.91
Wendover Village Greensboro, NC 2004 100% 176,939
 99.3% 3,510,597
 19.98
Total / Weighted Average       4,169,784
 99.2% $66,322,992
 $16.44

              ABR per
     Units 
Occupancy(2)
 
ABR(10)
 
Occupied SF(11)
Multifamily Properties         
  
Encore ApartmentsVirginia Beach, VA 2014 286
 94.4% $4,130,448
 $1.76
Johns Hopkins Village(11), (12)
Baltimore, MD 2016 157
 76.4
 5,916,960
 2.78
Liberty Apartments(11)
Newport News, VA 2013 197
 91.2
 2,263,236
 1.42
Smith’s Landing(12)
Blacksburg, VA 2009 284
 98.9
 3,653,952
 1.14
The Cosmopolitan(11)
Virginia Beach, VA 2006 342
 92.1
 6,013,536
 1.65
Total / Weighted Average    1,266
 94.3% 21,978,132
 $1.70
  Location   Year Built  Ownership Interest 
Net Rentable Square Feet (1)
 
Occupancy (2)
 
ABR (3)
 
ABR per Leased SF(3)
Office Properties              
4525 Main Street Virginia Beach, VA 2014 100% 234,938
 98.1% $6,718,239
 $29.14
Armada Hoffler Tower (8)(9)
 Virginia Beach, VA 2002 100% 320,680
 95.8% 8,889,551
 28.94
Brooks Crossing Office (7)
 Newport News, VA 2019 100% 98,061
 100.0% 1,814,129
 18.50
One City Center Durham, NC 2019 100% 152,815
 84.0% 4,145,189
 32.28
One Columbus (8)
 Virginia Beach, VA 1984 100% 128,876
 98.5% 3,184,938
 25.10
Thames Street Wharf (9)
 Baltimore, Maryland 2010 100% 263,426
 100.0% 7,141,829
 27.11
Two Columbus Virginia Beach, VA 2009 100% 108,459
 100.0% 2,907,497
 26.81
Total / Weighted Average       1,307,255
 96.6% $34,801,372
 $27.56
               
  Location Year Built Ownership Interest Units/Beds 
Occupancy (2)
 
ABR (10)
 
Monthly Rent per Occupied Unit/Bed (11)
Multifamily Properties            
  
1405 Point (6)(12)
 Baltimore, MD 2018 79% 289
 92.0% $6,933,252
 $2,172
Encore Apartments Virginia Beach, VA 2014 100% 286
 95.8% 4,318,296
 1,313
Greenside Apartments Charlotte, NC 2018 100% 225
 93.8% 4,010,676
 1,584
Hoffler Place (12)
 Charleston, SC 2019 93% 258
 89.1% 3,553,932
 1,244
Johns Hopkins Village (6)(12)
 Baltimore, MD 2016 100% 568
 98.8% 7,692,984
 1,143
Liberty Apartments (12)
 Newport News, VA 2013 100% 197
 93.9% 2,439,588
 1,099
Premier Apartments Virginia Beach, VA 2018 100% 131
 97.7% 2,212,920
 1,441
Smith’s Landing (6)
 Blacksburg, VA 2009 100% 284
 100.0% 4,250,868
 1,247
Total / Weighted Average       2,238
 95.6% $35,412,516
 $1,379

(1)The net rentable square footage for each of our office and retail properties is the sum of (a) the square footage of existing leases, plus (b) for available space, management’s estimate of net rentable square footage based, in part, on past leases. The net rentable square footage included in office leases is generally consistent with the Building Owners and Managers Association or BOMA, 1996 measurement guidelines. The net rentable square footage for each of our retail properties is the sum of (a) the square footage of existing leases, plus (b) for available space, the field verified square footage.
(2)Occupancy for each of our office and retail properties is calculated as (a) square footage under executed leases as of December 31, 20162019 divided by (b) net rentable square feet, expressed as a percentage. Occupancy for our multifamily properties is calculated as (a) total units occupied as of December 31, 20162019 divided by (b) total units available, expressed as a percentage.
(3)For the properties in our office and retail portfolios, annualized base rent or ABR,("ABR") is calculated by multiplying (a) monthly base rental payments for executed leases as of December 31, 2016rent (defined as cash base rents (before abatements)rent, before contractual tenant concessions and abatements, and excluding tenant reimbursements for expenses paid by the landlord)us) as of December 31, 2019 for in-place leases as of such date by (b) 12.12, and does not give effect to periodic contractual rent increases or contingent rental revenue (e.g., percentage rent based on tenant sales thresholds). ABR per leased square foot is calculated by dividing (a) ABR by (b) square footage under executedin-place leases as of December 31, 2016.2019. In the case of triple net or modified gross leases, our calculation of ABR does not include tenant reimbursements for real estate taxes, insurance, common area or other operating expenses.


(4)Net rentable square feet at certain of our retail properties includes pad sites leased pursuant to the ground leases in the table below:
Properties Subject to Ground Lease Number of Ground Leases Square Footage
Leased Pursuant to
Ground Leases		 ABR
Alexander Pointe 1 7,014 $10,000
Bermuda Crossroads 2 11,000 179,685
Broad Creek Shopping Center 6 23,825 649,818
Columbus Village 1 3,403 200,000
Hanbury Village 2 55,586 1,082,118
Harper Hill Commons 1 41,520 373,680
Indian Lakes Crossing 1 50,311 592,385
Market at Mill Creek 1 7,014 63,000
Marketplace at Hilltop 1 4,211 150,000
North Point Center 4 280,556 1,146,700
Oakland Marketplace 1 45,000 186,347
Red Mill Commons 8 33,961 773,609
Sandbridge Commons 3 60,521 738,500
Stone House Square 1 3,650 181,500
Tyre Neck Harris Teeter 1 48,859 533,285
Total / Weighted Average 34 676,431 $6,860,627

(5)Dick's Sporting Goods, one of the anchor tenants at the property previously known as "Dick’s at Town Center," notified the Company during 2019 that it would not renew its lease beyond January 31, 2020, the end of the current term. In October 2019, the Company signed a lease with a replacement tenant, Apex Entertainment, which will take the entire space currently occupied by Dick's Sporting Goods after the redevelopment and buildout of the facility is completed, which is expected to occur by the end of 2020.
(6)We lease the land underlying this property pursuant to a ground lease.
(7)We are entitled to a preferred return on our investment in this property.
(8)Includes ABR pursuant to a rooftop lease.
(9)As of December 31, 2016, the Company2019, we occupied 21,94255,390 square feet at this propertythese two properties at an ABR of $688,788,$1.7 million, or $30.48$31.30 per leased square foot, which amounts are reflected in the occupancy, ABR and ABR per leased square foot columns in thethis table. The rent paid by us is eliminated from our revenues in consolidation in accordance with GAAP.U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").
(5)As of December 31, 2016, the Company occupied 8,995 square feet at this property at an ABR of $304,841, or $33.89 per leased square foot, which amounts are reflected in the occupancy, ABR and ABR per leased square foot columns in the table. The rent paid by us is eliminated from our revenues in consolidation in accordance with GAAP.
(6)Includes $32,760 of ABR pursuant to a rooftop lease.

(7)The Company owns the land and the tenant owns the improvements thereto. The Company will succeed to the ownership of the improvements to the land upon the termination of the ground lease.
(8)The Company leases the land underlying this property from the owner of the land pursuant to a ground lease. The Company re-leases the land to our tenant under a separate ground lease pursuant to which our tenant owns the improvements on the land.
(9)(10)For the properties in our multifamily portfolio, ABR is calculated by multiplying (a) base rental payments for the month ended December 31, 20162019 by (b) 12.
(10)(11)ABRMonthly rent per occupied rentable square footunit/bed is calculated by dividing (a) ABRtotal base rental payments for the month ended December 31, 2019 by (b) net rentable square footagethe number of occupied units (or, in the case of Johns Hopkins Village and Hoffler Place, occupied beds of the 568 and 258 total beds, respectively) as of December 31, 2016.
(11)ABR for Liberty Apartments, The Cosmopolitan and Johns Hopkins Village excludes $212,000, $970,000 and $1,159,000 of ABR from ground floor retail leases, respectively.2019.
(12)The Company leases the land underlying this propertyABR for Liberty, John Hopkins Village, Hoffler Place and 1405 Point excludes approximately $0.3 million, $1.1 million, $0.1million and $0.4 million, respectively from the owner of the land pursuant to a ground lease.floor retail leases.




Lease Expirations

The following tables summarize the scheduled expirations of leases in our office and retail operating property portfolios as of December 31, 2016.2019. The information in the following tables does not assume the exercise of any renewal options.  
 
Office Lease Expirations
   Square     % of Office  
 Number of Footage of % Portfolio   Portfolio Annualized Base
 Leases Leases Net Rentable Annualized Annualized Rent per Leased
Year of Lease Expiration Expiring Expiring Square Feet Base Rent Base Rent Square Foot Number of Leases Expiring Square Footage of Leases Expiring % Portfolio Net Rentable Square Feet Annualized Base Rent % of Office Portfolio Annualized Base Rent Annualized Base Rent per Leased Square Foot
Available —
 135,627
 16.0% $—
 —% $—
 —
 44,285
 3.4% $—
 —% $—
2017 8
 14,159
 1.7
 437,004
 2.3
 30.86
2018 14
 80,010
 9.4
 2,214,896
 11.7
 27.68
Month-to-Month 2
 —
 —% 2,400
 —% —
2019 14
 90,120
 10.6
 2,259,108
 11.9
 25.07
 —
 —
 —% —
 —% —
2020 3
 17,840
 2.1
 524,457
 2.8
 29.40
 11
 24,796
 1.9% 781,419
 2.2% 31.51
2021 7
 56,046
 6.6
 1,368,210
 7.2
 24.41
 11
 48,532
 3.7% 1,312,408
 3.8% 27.04
2022 3
 48,117
 5.7
 1,347,805
 7.1
 28.01
 11
 77,259
 5.9% 2,213,506
 6.4% 28.65
2023 4
 43,078
 5.1
 1,087,325
 5.7
 25.24
 12
 103,647
 7.9% 2,707,291
 7.8% 26.12
2024 3
 60,751
 7.2
 1,706,129
 9.0
 28.08
 11
 136,575
 10.4% 3,442,021
 9.9% 25.20
2025 4
 43,292
 5.1
 1,218,282
 6.4
 28.14
 13
 131,701
 10.1% 3,859,343
 11.1% 29.30
2026 3
 15,168
 1.8
 328,333
 1.7
 21.65
 8
 36,863
 2.8% 926,963
 2.7% 25.15
2027 3
 49,072
 5.8
 1,395,219
 7.4
 28.43
 4
 244,864
 18.7% 6,921,178
 19.9% 28.27
2028 6
 63,319
 4.8% 1,754,231
 5.0% 27.70
2029 7
 242,709
 18.6% 6,136,048
 17.6% 25.28
Thereafter 9
 193,960
 22.9
 5,038,214
 26.8
 25.98
 6
 152,705
 11.8% 4,744,562
 13.6% 31.07
Total / Weighted Average 75
 847,240
 100.0% 18,924,982
 100.0% $26.59
 102
 1,307,255
 100.0% $34,801,370
 100.0% $27.55
 

Retail Lease Expirations
   Square     % of Retail  
 Number of Footage of % Portfolio   Portfolio Annualized Base
 Leases Leases Net Rentable Annualized Annualized Rent per Leased
Year of Lease Expiration Expiring Expiring Square Feet Base Rent Base Rent Square Foot Number of Leases Expiring Square Footage of Leases Expiring % Portfolio Net Rentable Square Feet Annualized Base Rent % of Office Portfolio Annualized Base Rent Annualized Base Rent per Leased Square Foot
Available —
 156,929
 4.4% $—
 —% $—
 —
 144,938
 3.4% $—
 —% $—
Month-to-Month 5
 7,342
 0.2
 118,656
 0.2
 16.16
 3
 4,200
 0.1% 83,758
 0.1% 19.94
2017 45
 224,974
 6.3
 3,645,108
 7.1
 16.20
2018 73
 331,094
 9.2
 5,371,571
 10.5
 16.22
2019 80
 559,851
 15.6
 8,515,948
 16.6
 15.21
 5
 25,565
 0.6% 457,889
 0.7% 17.91
2020 60
 507,658
 14.1
 7,073,303
 13.8
 13.93
 54
 240,266
 5.7% 3,578,216
 5.3% 14.89
2021 52
 268,455
 7.5
 4,965,436
 9.7
 18.50
 92
 351,636
 8.4% 6,781,107
 10.1% 19.28
2022 27
 262,149
 7.3
 3,798,078
 7.4
 14.49
 89
 507,590
 12.1% 8,349,932
 12.4% 16.45
2023 14
 246,153
 6.9
 3,077,764
 6.0
 12.50
 89
 514,434
 12.2% 8,398,508
 12.5% 16.33
2024 16
 165,318
 4.6
 2,596,382
 5.1
 15.71
 86
 530,254
 12.6% 8,696,487
 12.9% 16.40
2025 15
 223,613
 6.2
 2,259,666
 4.4
 10.11
 59
 544,465
 12.9% 7,332,252
 10.9% 13.47
2026 19
 154,386
 4.3
 2,649,185
 5.2
 17.16
 27
 164,729
 3.9% 3,209,776
 4.8% 19.49
2027 9
 75,346
 2.1
 1,732,069
 3.4
 22.99
 22
 136,840
 3.3% 3,019,722
 4.5% 22.07
2028 24
 252,999
 6.0% 3,521,547
 5.2% 13.92
2029 23
 108,253
 2.6% 2,152,130
 3.2% 19.88
Thereafter 16
 409,290
 11.3
 5,484,599
 10.6
 13.40
 41
 682,777
 16.2% 11,710,681
 17.4% 17.15
Total / Weighted Average 431
 3,592,558
 100.0% $51,287,765
 100.0% $14.93
 614
 4,208,946
 100.0% $67,292,005
 100.0% $16.56


Tenant Diversification
 
The following tables list the 10 largest tenants in each of our office and retail operating property portfolios, based on annualized base rent as of December 31, 20162019 ($ in thousands):  
   % of % of
   Office Total
   Portfolio Portfolio
 Annualized Annualized Annualized
Office Tenant
 
Base Rent  
 
Base Rent 
 
Base Rent 
 Annualized Base Rent   % of
Office
Portfolio
Annualized
Base Rent 		 % of
Total
Portfolio
Annualized
Base Rent 
Morgan Stanley $5,761
 16.6% 4.1%
Clark Nexsen $2,487
 13.1% 2.7% 2,639
 7.6% 1.9%
Hampton University 1,023
 5.4
 1.1
Commonwealth of Virginia 891
 4.7
 1.0
WeWork 2,259
 6.5% 1.6%
Duke University 1,540
 4.4% 1.1%
Huntington Ingalls 1,513
 4.3% 1.1%
Mythics 1,187
 3.4% 0.8%
Johns Hopkins Medicine 1,118
 3.2% 0.8%
Pender & Coward 904
 2.6% 0.6%
Kimley-Horn 859
 4.5
 0.9
 894
 2.6% 0.6%
Pender & Coward 839
 4.4
 0.9
Troutman Sanders 822
 4.3
 0.9
 872
 2.5% 0.6%
The Art Institute 819
 4.3
 0.9
Williams Mullen 755
 4.0
 0.8
City of Virginia Beach Development Authority 701
 3.7
 0.8
Cherry Bekaert 698
 3.7
 0.8
Top 10 Total $9,894
 52.1% 10.8% $18,687
 53.7% 13.2%


 

   % of % of
   Retail Total
   Portfolio Portfolio
 Annualized Annualized Annualized
Retail Tenant Base Rent Base Rent Base Rent Annualized Base Rent % of
Retail
Portfolio
Annualized
Base Rent		 % of
Total
Portfolio
Annualized
Base Rent
Kroger/Harris Teeter $5,923
 11.5% 6.4%
Home Depot 2,190
 4.3
 2.4
Bed, Bath & Beyond 1,669
 3.3
 1.8
Harris Teeter/Kroger $5,645
 8.4% 4.0%
Lowes Foods 1,976
 2.9% 1.4%
Regal Cinemas 1,607
 3.1
 1.7
 1,713
 2.5% 1.2%
Bed, Bath, & Beyond 1,710
 2.5% 1.2%
PetSmart 1,398
 2.7
 1.5
 1,438
 2.1% 1.0%
Food Lion 1,283
 2.5
 1.4
 1,315
 2.0% 0.9%
Dick's Sporting Goods 840
 1.6
 0.9
Safeway 821
 1.6
 0.9
Petco 877
 1.3% 0.6%
Weis Markets 802
 1.6
 0.9
 802
 1.2% 0.6%
Total Wine & More 765
 1.1% 0.5%
Ross Dress for Less 755
 1.5
 0.8
 762
 1.1% 0.5%
Top 10 Total $17,288
 33.7% 18.7% $17,003
 25.1% 11.9%


Development Pipeline
 
In addition to the properties in our operating property portfolio as of December 31, 2016,2019, we had the following properties in various stages of development, redevelopment, and stabilization. We generally consider a property to be stabilized when itupon the earlier of: (i) the quarter after the property reaches 80% occupancy or thirteen quarters(ii) the thirteenth quarter after acquisition or completion.the property receives its certificate of occupancy.  
Pending Delivery     ($ in '000s) 
Schedule(1)
    
              Stabilized    
    Estimated Estimated  Incurred    Initial Operation AHH     
Property Location  
Size(1) 
 
Cost(1) 
 Cost Start Occupancy (2) Ownership % Property Type
Harding Place Charlotte, NC 225 units $45,000
 $8,000
 3Q16 3Q18 1Q20 
80 % (3)
 Multifamily
Town Center Phase VI Virginia Beach, VA 39,000 sf
130 Units		 42,000
 3,000
 4Q16 3Q18 3Q19 
80 % (5)
 Mixed-use
Brooks Crossing Newport News, VA 100,000 sf 20,000
 —
 3Q16 4Q18 4Q18 
65% (3)
 Office
Total     $107,000
 $11,000
          
Development, Not Delivered     ($ in '000s) 
Schedule (1)
    
    Estimated Estimated  Incurred    Initial Stabilized AHH     
Property Location  
Size (1) 
 
Cost (1) 
 Cost Start Occupancy 
Operation (2)
 Ownership % Property Type
Summit Place Charleston, SC 357 beds $56,000
 $51,300
 3Q17 3Q20 4Q20 90 % Multifamily
Wills Wharf Baltimore, MD 325,000 sf 120,000
 86,500
 3Q18 2Q20 2Q21 100% Office
Total Development, Pending Delivery $176,000
 $137,800
          

Delivered Not Stabilized     ($ in '000s) Schedule    
              Stabilized    
    Estimated Estimated  Incurred    Initial Operation AHH  
Property Location 
Size(1) 
 
Cost(1) 
 Cost  Start  Occupancy (1)(2) Ownership % Property Type
Brooks Crossing Newport News, VA 18,000 sf $3,000
 $3,000
 3Q15 3Q16 4Q16 
65% (3)

 Retail
4525 Main Street Virginia Beach, VA 239,000 sf 51,000
 46,000
 1Q13 3Q14 2Q17 100% Office
Johns Hopkins Village Baltimore, MD 157 units 68,000
 67,000
 1Q15 3Q16 3Q17 
80% (3), (4)

 Multifamily
Lightfoot Marketplace Williamsburg, VA 109,000 sf 24,000
 23,000
 3Q14 3Q16 2Q17 
70% (3)

 Retail
Total Development, Delivered Not Stabilized 146,000
 139,000
          
Total     $253,000
 $150,000
        
  
Development/Redevelopment, Delivered Not Stabilized   ($ in '000s) Schedule    
    Estimated Estimated  Incurred    Initial Stabilized AHH  
Property Location 
Size (1) 
 
Cost (1) 
 Cost  Start  Occupancy 
Operation (1)(2)
 Ownership % Property Type
Premier Retail Virginia Beach, VA 39,000 sf $15,000
 $15,000
 4Q16 3Q18 1Q21 100% Retail
The Cosmopolitan Virginia Beach, VA 342 units 14,000
 6,300
 1Q18 N/A 1Q21 100% Multifamily
Total Development/Redevelopment, Delivered Not Stabilized 29,000
 21,300
          
Total     $205,000
 $159,100
          

(1)Represents estimates that may change as the development/stabilization process proceeds.
(2)Estimated first full quarter of stabilized operations.
(3)We Estimates are entitled to a preferred return oninherently uncertain, and we can provide no assurance that our equity prior to any distributions to minority partners.
(4)Includes space subject to ground lease. 
(5)Ownership increased to 100% in January 2017.assumptions regarding the timing of stabilization will prove accurate.
 

Our execution on all of the projects identified in the preceding tabletables are subject to, among other factors, regulatory approvals, financing availability, and suitable market conditions.

Harding Place Wills Wharfis a $45mixed-use development project in the Harbor Point area of Baltimore, Maryland. The project will include office space occupied primarily by WeWork and Ernst & Young and will also include a lease to the operator of a Canopy by Hilton hotel with expected delivery in 2020.

Summit Place is a $56.0 million Class A multifamilystudent housing property being developed in Midtown Charlotte, NorthCharleston, South Carolina with expected delivery in 2018.2020.


Town Center Phase VIPremier Retail is the nextretail portion of the most recent phase of development in the Town Center of Virginia Beach, a $42 million mixed-use project expected to include 39,000 square feet of retail space, which is nearly 50% pre-leased as of the date of this report, and more than 130 luxury apartments, as part of the Company'sour ongoing public-private partnership with the City of Virginia Beach.

Brooks Crossing Premier Retail is our public-private partnership with the Citypart of Newport News, Virginia designed to revitalize the east end of the city. Thea $45.0 million mixed-use project that includes 18,00039,000 square feet of retail space, and iswhich was 75.6% leased by miscellaneous small retailers. Asas of December 31, 2016, the2019, and 131 luxury apartments, which were 97.7% leased as of December 31, 2019.

The Cosmopolitan is a $14.0 million redevelopment project was approximately 59.8% leased.  Additionally, we have agreed to develop, build and ownof a 100,000 square foot office tower anchored by Newport News Shipbuilding, a division of Huntington Ingalls Industries (NYSE:HII), as part of Brooks Crossing. The office development startedmultifamily property in the third quarter of 2016.

4525 Main Street is our most recent addition to the Town Center of Virginia Beach, which includes renovation of all 342 units and modernization of the residential clubhouse and the business center. The project started during the first quarter of 2018 and is located atexpected to be completed during the intersectionfourth quarter of Main Street and Town Center Drive across from The Cosmopolitan, One Columbus and Armada Hoffler Tower. This 15-story office tower is anchored by Clark Nexsen, an international architecture and engineering firm, to whom we delivered approximately 85,000 square feet of office space in July 2014. Additionally, we delivered to the City of Virginia Beach Development Authority approximately 23,000 square feet of office space in June 2014. 4525 Main Street also features approximately 26,000 square feet of ground floor retail space anchored by Anthropologie, West Elm and Tupelo Honey Cafe. As of December 31, 2016, the project was approximately 76.7% leased. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, 4525 Main Street is now 93% leased.2020.
Johns Hopkins Village includes student housing, retail space and parking located adjacent to Johns Hopkins University’s Homewood campus in Baltimore, Maryland. This mixed-use development is designed to complement both the Homewood campus and nearby Charles Village neighborhood and provide a catalyst for future development in the area. CVS has leased 10,500 square feet of ground floor retail space. Construction was completed in August 2016. Approximately 76.4% of the apartment units were leased as of December 31, 2016.

Lightfoot Marketplace is a grocery-anchored shopping center in Williamsburg, Virginia. Harris Teeter has signed a 20-year ground lease for a new 53,000 square foot store. Lightfoot Marketplace also includes an additional 34,000 square feet of shops and restaurants as well as a 22,000 square foot build-to-suit building for Children’s Hospital of the King’s Daughters.   As of December 31, 2016, the project was approximately 49.2% leased.

Other Investments


Point Street Apartments
On October 15, 2015, we agreed to invest up to $28.2 million in the Point Street Apartments project in the Harbor Point area of Baltimore, Maryland. Point Street Apartments is an estimated $93.0 million development project with plans for a 17-story building comprised of 289 residential units and 18,000 square feet of street-level retail space. Beatty Development Group (“BDG”) is the developer of the project and has engaged us to serve as construction general contractor. Point Street Apartments is scheduled to open in 2017; however, we can provide no assurances that Point Street Apartments will open on the anticipated timeline.
BDG secured a senior construction loan of up to $70.0 million to fund the development and construction of Point Street Apartments on November 10, 2016. We have agreed to guarantee $25.0 million of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase up to an 88% controlling interest in Point Street Apartments upon completion of the project as follows. We currently have a $2.1 million letter of credit for the guarantee of the senior construction loan.
Our investment in the Point Street Apartments project is in the form of a loan under which BDG may borrow up to $28.2 million (the “BDG loan”). As of December 31, 2016, we have funded $20.6 million under the BDG loan and for the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized $1.2 million of interest income on the BDG loan. See Note 6 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

One City Center
On February 25, 2016, we announced our joint venture with Austin Lawrence Partners to develop and construct One City Center in Durham, North Carolina. One City Center is a planned 27-story mixed-use project that is expected to include 130,000 square feet of office space, anchored by a 55,000 square foot lease with Duke University, along with 22,000 square feet of street-level retail space and 139 residential units. We are a minority partner in the joint venture and will serve as the project's general contractor, with full ownership of the office and retail portions of the project. Our equity investment in the joint venture is approximately $10.3 million. The project is scheduled to be completed in mid-2018. The projectResidences at One City Center is an unconsolidated joint venture.

Annapolis Junction


On April 21, 2016, we entered into a note receivable with a maximum principal balance of $42.0$48.1 million in the Annapolis Junction residential component of the Annapolis Junction Town Center project in Maryland (“("Annapolis Junction”Junction"). Annapolis Junction is an estimated $102.0 millionapartment development project with 416 residential units. It is part of a mixed-use development project with plans for 416 residential units,that is also planned to have 17,000 square feet of retail space and a 150-room hotel. Annapolis Junction Apartments Owner, LLC (“AJAO”("AJAO") is the developer of the residential component and has engaged us to serve as construction general contractor for the residential component. Annapolis Junction opened during 2017 and 2018 and is scheduled to opencurrently in 2017; however, management can provide no assurances that Annapolis Junction will openlease-up.
Interest on the anticipated timeline orAJAO loan accrues at the anticipated cost.
10.0% per annum. On November 16, 2018, AJAO secured arefinanced the senior construction loan with a one year senior loan of up$83.0 million. This senior loan includes two six-month extension options subject to $60.0 million to fund the developmentminimum debt yields and construction of Annapolis Junction's residential component on September 30, 2016.minimum debt service coverage ratios. We have agreed to guarantee $25.0$8.3 million of the senior construction loan, in exchangeand the AJAO loan will mature concurrent with the new senior loan. In conjunction with this refinancing, we received a $5.0 million loan modification fee, which is being accounted for as a loan discount that was recognized as interest income over the one year loan term from November 2018 to November 2019 using the effective interest method. Additionally, AJAO repaid $11.1 million of the outstanding mezzanine loan balance as part of this refinancing. On December 1, 2019, the first six-month extension option for the option to purchase up tosenior loan was exercised, and our mezzanine loan was extended in tandem. AJAO will pay an 88% controlling interest in Annapolis Junctionexit fee of $3.0 million upon completionfull repayment of the project. Our investment inloan, which is being recognized through the Annapolis Junction project is incurrent remaining term of the form of a loan under which AJAO may borrow up to $48.0 million, including a $6.0 million interest reserve (the “AJAO loan”). During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized $2.0 million ofas interest income onusing the note. effective interest method.

The balance on the Annapolis Junction note was $38.9$40.0 million as of December 31, 2016.

Acquisitions and Dispositions
On January 7, 2016,2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we completed the salerecognized $8.8 million of a building constructed for the Economic Development Authority of Newport News, Virginia.  Net proceeds after transaction costs were $6.6 million.  The gaininterest income on the disposition was $0.4 million.

On January 8, 2016, we completed the sale of the Richmond Tower office building for $78.0 million. Net proceeds after transaction costs were $77.0 million. The gain on the disposition of Richmond Tower was $26.2 million.

On January 14, 2016, we completed the acquisition of a $170.5 million retail portfolio totaling 1.1 million square feet across 11 properties.

On April 29, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Southgate Square, a 220,000 square foot retail center located in Colonial Heights, Virginia, for aggregate consideration of $39.5 million, comprised of the assumption of $21.1 million in debt (which approximates fair value as of the closing date) and 1,575,185 Class A units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“Class A Units”).
On June 20, 2016, we completed the sale of the Willowbrook Commons property located in Nashville, Tennessee for $9.2 million.  The gain on the sale of the Willowbrook Commons property was less than $0.1 million.

On July 29, 2016, we completed the sale of the Kroger Junction property located in Pasadena, Texas for $3.7 million. The loss on the sale of the Kroger Junction property was less than $0.1 million.

On August 4, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Southshore Shops, a 40,000 square foot retail center located in Midlothian, Virginia, for aggregate consideration of $9.3 million, comprised of $6.7 million in cash and 189,160 Class A Units.

On September 15, 2016, we completed the sale of the Oyster Point office property for $6.4 million. Net proceeds after transaction costs and settlement of liabilities were not significant. The gain on the disposition of Oyster Point was $3.8 million.

On October 13, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Columbus Village II, a 92,000 square foot retail and entertainment center adjacent to the Town Center of Virginia Beach, for aggregate consideration of 2,000,000 shares of our

common stock, which based on the closing stock price on the date of the acquisition, led to an acquisition price of $26.2 million, excluding capitalized acquisition costs.

On November 17, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Renaissance Square, an 80,000 square foot retail center located in Davidson, North Carolina, for aggregate consideration of $17.1 million in cash.

On December 22, 2016, we completed the sale of land adjacent to the Brooks Crossing development for $0.4 million. The gain on the disposition of the land was less than $0.1 million.

Additional information regarding our real estate acquisition and disposition activity is set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and innote. See Note 56 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

SegmentsDelray Plaza

AsOn October 27, 2017, we invested in the development of an estimated $20.0 million Whole Foods-anchored center located in Delray Beach, Florida. The Company's investment is in the form of a mezzanine loan of up to $13.1 million to the developer, Delray Plaza Holdings, LLC. On January 8, 2019, this loan was modified to increase the maximum amount of the loan to $15.0 million. The mezzanine loan bears interest at a rate 15.0% per annum. The note matures on the earliest of (i) October 27, 2020, (ii) the date of any sale or refinance of the development project, or (iii) the disposition or change in control of the development project. The balance on the Delray Plaza note was $13.0 million as of December 31, 2016,2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we operated in four business segments: (i) office real estate, (ii) retail real estate, (iii) multifamily residential real estate and (iv) general contracting and real estate services. Additional information regarding our four operating segments is set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysisrecognized $1.6 million of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and ininterest income on the note. See Note 36 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Nexton Square

On December 4, 2018, we entered into a mezzanine loan agreement with the developer of Nexton Square, a shopping center development project located in Summerville, South Carolina, which has a maximum capacity of $17.0 million. On February 8, 2019, the developer closed on a senior construction loan with a maximum borrowing capacity of $25.2 million. This loan bears interest at a rate of 10.0% per annum. The note matures on the earliest of (i) December 4, 2020, (ii) the maturity date of the senior construction loan, including any extension options available and exercised under that loan, or (iii) the date of any sale, transfer, or refinancing of the project.

We agreed to guarantee 50% of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase the property upon completion according to a predetermined formula primarily dependent upon the developer's leasing activities and the extent to which the developer elects to complete all or a portion of the total planned space, if applicable, in response to leasing activities.

The balance on the Nexton Square loan was $15.1 million as of December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized $2.0 million of interest income on the loan. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
    
Interlock Commercial

On December 21, 2018, we entered into a mezzanine loan agreement with the developer of the office and retail components of The Interlock, a new mixed-use public-private partnership with Georgia Tech in West Midtown Atlanta. The loan has a maximum principal amount of $67.0 million and a total maximum commitment, including accrued interest reserves, of $95.0 million. The mezzanine loan bears interest at a rate of 15.0% per annum and matures on the earlier of (i) 24 months after the original maturity date or earlier termination date of the senior construction loan or (ii) any sale, transfer, or refinancing of the project. In the event that the maturity date is established as being 24 months after the original maturity date or earlier termination date of the senior construction loan, the developer will have the right to extend the maturity date for five years.

On April 19, 2019, the borrower executed its senior construction loan, and the Company's payment guarantee of up to $30.7 million became effective.

The balance on the Interlock Commercial note was $59.2 million as of December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized $6.1 million of interest income on the note. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Solis Apartments at Interlock

On December 21, 2018, we entered into a mezzanine loan agreement with the developer of Solis Apartments at Interlock, which is the apartment component of The Interlock in West Midtown Atlanta. The mezzanine loan has a maximum principal commitment of $25.2 million and a total maximum commitment, including accrued interest reserves, of $41.1 million. The mezzanine loan bears interest at a rate of 13.0% per annum and matures on the earlier of (a) the later of (i) December 21, 2021 or (ii) the maturity date or earlier termination date of the senior construction loan, including any extensions of the senior construction loan, or (b) the date of any sale of the project or refinance of the loan.

The balance on the Solis Apartments at Interlock note was $25.6 million as of December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized $2.3 million of interest income on the note. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Acquisitions and Dispositions
On February 6, 2019, we acquired an additional outparcel phase of Wendover Village in Greensboro, North Carolina for a contract price of $2.7 million. This phase is leased by a single tenant.

On March 14, 2019, we acquired the office and retail portions of the One City Center project in Durham, North Carolina, in exchange for a redemption of our 37% equity ownership in the joint venture with Austin Lawrence Partners, which totaled $23.0 million as of the acquisition date, and a cash payment of $23.2 million.

On April 24, 2019, we purchased a 79% controlling interest in the partnership that owns 1405 Point, a 17-story luxury high-rise apartment building located in the emerging Harbor Point area of the Baltimore waterfront in exchange for extinguishing our $31.3 million note receivable on the project, making a cash payment of $0.3 million, and assuming a loan payable of $64.9 million.

On May 23, 2019, we acquired Red Mill Commons and Marketplace at Hilltop from Venture Realty Group for consideration comprised of 4.1 million OP Units, the assumption of $35.7 million of mortgage debt, and $4.5 million in cash. The negotiated price was $105.0 million, which contemplated the price of our common stock of $15.55 per share when the purchase and sale agreement was executed. In connection with the acquisition, we and the Operating Partnership entered into a tax protection agreement with the contributors pursuant to which we and the Operating Partnership agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to indemnify the contributors for up to 10 years against certain tax liabilities incurred by them, if such liabilities result from a transaction involving a direct or indirect taxable disposition of either or both of these properties or if the Operating Partnership fails to maintain and allocate to the contributors for taxation purposes minimum levels of Operating Partnership liabilities.

On June 26, 2019, we acquired Thames Street Wharf, a Class A office building located in the Harbor Point development of Baltimore, Maryland for $101.0 million in cash.

On October 25, 2019, we purchased land in Roswell, Georgia for a purchase price of $5.0 million. We plan to use the land to develop a mixed-use property.

Subsequent to December 31, 2019

On January 10, 2020, we purchased land in Charlotte, North Carolina for a purchase price of $6.3 million for the development of a mixed-use property.

Tax Status
 
We have elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2013. Our continued qualification as a REIT will depend upon our ability to meet, on a continuing basis, through actual investment and operating results, various complex requirements under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”"Code"), relating to, among other things, the sources of our gross income, the composition and values of our assets, our distribution levels, and the diversity of ownership of our capital stock. We believe that we are organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code and that our manner of operation will enable us to maintain the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, we have elected to treat AHP Holding, Inc., which, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, operate our construction, development, and third-party asset management businesses, as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”("TRS").
 
As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our net taxable income that we distribute currently to our stockholders. Under the Code, REITs are subject to numerous organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that they distribute each year at least 90% of their REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gains. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year and do not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, our income for that year will be taxed at regular corporate rates, and we would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we ceased to qualify as a REIT. Even if we qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may still be subject to state and local taxes on our income and assets and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income. Additionally, any income earned by our services company, and any other TRS we form in the future, will be fully subject to federal, state and local corporate income tax.


Insurance
 
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, business interruption, and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in our portfolio under a blanket insurance policy in addition to other coverage that may be appropriate for certain of our properties. We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate for our properties given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage, and industry practice; however, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to fully cover our losses. We do not carry insurance for certain losses, including, but not limited to, losses caused by riots or war. Some of our policies, likesuch as those covering losses due to terrorism and earthquakes, are insured subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be sufficient to cover losses for such events. In addition, all but two of the properties in our portfolio as of December 31, 20162019 were located in Maryland, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and South Carolina, and Georgia, which are areas subject to an increased risk of hurricanes. While we will carry hurricane insurance on certain of our properties, the amount of our hurricane insurance coverage may not be sufficient to fully cover losses from hurricanes. We may reduce or discontinue hurricane, terrorism, or other insurance on some or all of our properties in the future if the cost of premiums for any of these policies exceeds, in our judgment, the value of the coverage discounted for the risk of loss. Also, if destroyed, we may not be able to rebuild certain of our properties due to current zoning and land use regulations. As a result, we may incur significant costs in the event of adverse weather conditions and natural disasters. In

addition, our title insurance policies may not insure for the current aggregate market value of our portfolio, and we do not intend to increase our title insurance coverage as the market value of our portfolio increases. If we or one or more of our tenants experiences a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable costs in the future as the costs associated with property and casualty renewals may be higher than anticipated.  
 
Regulation
 
General
 
Our properties are subject to various covenants, laws, ordinances, and regulations, including regulations relating to common areas and fire and safety requirements. We believe that each of the properties in our portfolio has the necessary permits and approvals to operate its business.
 
Americans With Disabilities Act
 
Our properties must comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”"ADA"), to the extent that such properties are “public accommodations”"public accommodations" as defined by the ADA. Under the ADA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The ADA may require removal of structural barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. Although we believe that the properties in our portfolio in the aggregate substantially comply with present requirements of the ADA, we have not conducted a comprehensive audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine our compliance, and we are aware that some particular properties may currently be in non-compliance with the ADA. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the incurrence of additional costs to attain compliance, the imposition of fines, an award of damages to private litigants, and a limitation on our ability to refinance outstanding indebtedness. The obligation to make readily achievable accommodations is an ongoing one, and we will continue to assess our properties and to make alterations as appropriate in this respect.


Environmental Matters
 
Under various federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the environment, as a current or former owner or operator of real property, we may be liable for costs and damages resulting from the presence or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances, waste, or petroleum products at, on, in, under, or migrating from such property, including costs to investigate and clean up such contamination and liability for harm to natural resources. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such contamination, and the liability may be joint and several. These liabilities could be substantial, and the cost of any required remediation, removal, fines, or other costs could exceed the value of the property and our aggregate assets. In addition, the presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at our properties may expose us to third-party liability for costs of remediation and personal or property damage or materially adversely affect our ability to sell, lease, or develop our properties or to borrow using the properties as collateral. In addition, environmental laws may create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs to address such contamination. Moreover, if contamination is discovered on our properties,

environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures.
 
Some of our properties contain, have contained, or are adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or currently contain storage tanks for the storage of petroleum products, propane, or other hazardous or toxic substances. Similarly, some of our properties were used in the past for commercial or industrial purposes, or are currently used for commercial purposes, that involve or involved the use of petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances, or are adjacent to or near properties that have been or are used for similar commercial or industrial purposes. As a result, some of our properties have been or may be impacted by contamination arising from the releases of such hazardous substances or petroleum products. Where we have deemed appropriate, we have taken steps to address identified contamination or mitigate risks associated with such contamination; however, we are unable to ensure that further actions will not be necessary. As a result of the foregoing, we could potentially incur material liability.
 
Environmental laws also govern the presence, maintenance, and removal of asbestos-containing building materials, or ACBM, and may impose fines and penalties for failure to comply with these requirements or expose us to third-party liability. Such laws require that owners or operators of buildings containing ACBM (and employers in such buildings) properly manage

and maintain the asbestos, adequately notify or train those who may come into contact with asbestos, and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, if asbestos would be disturbed during renovation or demolition of a building. In addition, the presence of ACBM in our properties may expose us to third-party liability (e.g. liability for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos). We are not presently aware of any material adverse issues at our properties including ACBM.
 
Similarly, environmental laws govern the presence, maintenance, and removal of lead-based paint in residential buildings, and may impose fines and penalties for failure to comply with these requirements. Such laws require, among other things, that owners or operators of residential facilities that contain or potentially contain lead-based paint notify residents of the presence or potential presence of lead-based paint prior to occupancy and prior to renovations and manage lead-based paint waste appropriately. In addition, the presence of lead-based paint in our buildings may expose us to third-party liability (e.g., liability for personal injury associated with exposure to lead-based paint). We are not presently aware of any material adverse issues at our properties involving lead-based paint.
 
In addition, the properties in our portfolio also are subject to various federal, state, and local environmental and health and safety requirements, such as state and local fire requirements. Moreover, some of our tenants may handle and use hazardous or regulated substances and wastes as part of their operations at our properties, which are subject to regulation. Such environmental and health and safety laws and regulations could subject us or our tenants to liability resulting from these activities. Environmental liabilities could affect a tenant’s ability to make rental payments to us. In addition, changes in laws could increase the potential liability for noncompliance. Our leases sometimes require our tenants to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations and to indemnify us for any related liabilities. ButHowever, in the event of the bankruptcy or inability of any of our tenants to satisfy such obligations, we may be required to satisfy such obligations. In addition, we may be held directly liable for any such damages or claims regardless of whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or waste and irrespective of tenant lease provisions. The costs associated with such liability could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on us.


When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Indoor air quality issues can also stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contamination from indoor or outdoor sources, and other biological contaminants such as pollen, viruses, and bacteria. Indoor exposure to airborne toxins or irritants above certain levels can be alleged to cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold or other airborne contaminants from the affected property or increase indoor ventilation. In addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to liability from our tenants, employees of our tenants, or others if property damage or personal injury occurs. We are not presently aware of any material adverse indoor air quality issues at our properties.
 
Competition
 
We compete with a number of developers, owners, and operators of office, retail, and multifamily real estate, many of which own properties similar to ours in the same markets in which our properties are located and some of which have greater financial resources than we do. In operating and managing our portfolio, we compete for tenants based on a number of factors, including location, rental rates, security, flexibility, and expertise to design space to meet prospective tenants’ needs and the

manner in which the property is operated, maintained, and marketed. As leases at our properties expire, we may encounter significant competition to renew or re-lease space in light of the large number of competing properties within the markets in which we operate. As a result, we may be required to provide rent concessions or abatements, incur charges for tenant improvements and other inducements, including early termination rights or below-market renewal options, or we may not be able to timely lease vacant space.
 
We also face competition when pursuing development, acquisition, and acquisitionlending opportunities. Our competitors may be able to pay higher property acquisition prices, may have private access to opportunities not available to us, may have more financial resources than we do, and may otherwise be in a better position to acquire or develop a property. Competition may also have the effect of reducing the number of suitable development and acquisition opportunities available to us or increasing the price required to consummate a development or acquisition opportunity.
 
In addition, we face competition in our construction business from other construction companies in the markets in which we operate, including small local companies and large regional and national companies. In our construction business, we compete for construction projects based on several factors, including cost, reputation for quality and timeliness, access to machinery and equipment, access to and relationships with high-quality subcontractors, financial strength, knowledge of local

markets, and project management abilities. We believe that we compete favorably on the basis of the foregoing factors and that our construction business is well-positioned to compete effectively in the markets in which we operate. However, some of the construction companies with which we compete have different cost structures and greater financial and other resources than we do, which may put them at an advantage when competing with us for construction projects. Competition from other construction companies may reduce the number of construction projects that we are hired to complete and increase pricing pressure, either of which could reduce the profitability of our construction business.
 
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had 151169 employees. None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good.
 
Corporate Information
 
Our principal executive office is located at 222 Central Park Avenue, Suite 2100, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 in the Armada Hoffler Tower at the Town Center of Virginia Beach. In addition, we have construction offices located at 249222 Central Park Avenue, Suite 300,1000, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 and 1300 Thames Street, Suite 30, Baltimore, Maryland 21231. The telephone number for our principal executive office is (757) 366-4000. We maintain a website located at www.armadahoffler.com.ArmadaHoffler.com. The information on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into and does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.


Available Information
 
We file our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports with the SEC. You may obtain copies of these documents by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are furnished to the SEC, we make copies of these documents available to the public free of charge through our website or by contacting our Corporate Secretary at the address set forth above under “—"—Corporate Information.”"
 
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the charters of our audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee are all available in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations section of our website. Any amendment to or waiver of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be disclosed in the Corporate Governance section of the Investor Relations section of our website within four business days of the amendment or waiver.
 
Financial Information
 
For required financial information related to our operations, please refer to our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Item 1A.Risk Factors  
 
Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to our stockholders. You should carefully consider the following risks in evaluating our Company and our business. The occurrence of any of the following risks could materially and adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, the market price of shares of our common stock, and our ability to, among other things, satisfy our debt service obligations and to make distributions to our stockholders, which in turn could cause our stockholders to lose all or a part of their investment. Some statements in this reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K, including statements in the following risk factors constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to the section entitled “Special"Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”Statements" at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Risks Related to Our Business
 
Our failure to establish new development relationships with public partners and expand our development relationships with existing public partners could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow, and growth prospects.
Our growth strategy depends significantly on our ability to leverage our extensive experience in completing large, complex, mixed-use public/private projects to establish new relationships with public partners and expand our relationships with existing public partners. Future increases in our revenues may depend significantly on our ability to expand the scope of the work we do with the state and local government agencies with which we currently have partnered and attract new state and local government agencies to undertake public/private development projects with us. Our ability to obtain new work with state and local governmental authorities on new public/private development and financing partnerships could be adversely affected by several factors, including decreases in state and local budgets, changes in administrations, the departure of government personnel with whom we have worked, and negative public perceptions about public/private partnerships. In addition, to the extent that we engage in public/private partnerships in states or local communities in which we have not previously worked, we could be subject to risks associated with entry into new markets, such as lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, lack of business relationships in the area, competition with other companies that already have an established presence in the area, difficulties in hiring and retaining key personnel, difficulties in evaluating quality tenants in the area, and unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures. If we fail to establish new relationships with public partners and expand our relationships with existing public partners, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow, and growth prospects.
We may be unable to identify and complete development opportunities and acquisitions of properties that meet our investment criteria, which may materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, and growth prospects.
Our business and growth strategy involves the development and selective acquisition of office, retail, and multifamily properties. We may expend significant management time and other resources, including out-of-pocket costs, in pursuing these investment opportunities. Our ability to complete development projects or acquire properties on favorable terms, or at all, may be exposed to the following significant risks: 

we may incur significant costs and divert management attention in connection with evaluating and negotiating potential development opportunities and acquisitions, including those that we are subsequently unable to complete;

we have agreements for the development or acquisition of properties that are subject to conditions, which we may be unable to satisfy; and

we may be unable to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all.
If we are unable to identify attractive investment opportunities and successfully develop new properties, our results of operations, cash flow, and growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.


The success of our activities to design, construct and develop properties in which we will retain an ownership interest is dependent, in part, on the availability of suitable undeveloped land at acceptable prices as well as our having sufficient liquidity to fund investments in such undeveloped land and subsequent development.
Our success in designing, constructing, and developing projects for our own account depends, in part, upon the continued availability of suitable undeveloped land at acceptable prices. The availability of undeveloped land for purchase at favorable prices depends on a number of factors outside of our control, including the risk of competitive over-bidding on land and governmental regulations that restrict the potential uses of land. If the availability of suitable land opportunities decreases, the number of development projects we may be able to undertake could be reduced. In addition, our ability to make land purchases will depend upon our having sufficient liquidity or access to external sources of capital to fund such purchases. Thus, the lack of availability of suitable land opportunities and insufficient liquidity to fund the purchases of any such available land opportunities could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and growth prospects.

Our real estate development activities are subject to risks particular to development, such as unanticipated expenses, delays and other contingencies, any of which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
We engage in development and redevelopment activities and will be subject to the following risks associated with such activities: 

unsuccessful development or redevelopment opportunities could result in direct expenses to us and cause us to incur losses;

construction or redevelopment costs of a project may exceed original estimates, possibly making the project less profitable than originally estimated, or unprofitable;

the inability to obtain or delays in obtaining necessary governmental or quasi-governmental permits and authorizations could result in increased costs or abandonment of the project if necessary permits or authorizations are not obtained;

delayed construction may give tenants the right to terminate pre-development leases, which may adversely impact the financial viability of the project;

occupancy rates, rents and concessions of a completed project may fluctuate depending on a number of factors and may not be sufficient to make the project profitable; and

the availability and pricing of financing to fund our development activities on favorable terms or at all may result in delays or even abandonment of certain development activities.

These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development or redevelopment activities once undertaken, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.

The geographic concentration of our portfolio could cause us to be more susceptible to adverse economic or regulatory developments in the markets in which our properties are located than if we owned a more geographically diverse portfolio.
 
The majority of the properties in our portfolio are located in Virginia, Maryland, and North Carolina, which expose us to greater economic risks than if we owned a more geographically diverse portfolio. As of December 31, 2016,2019, our properties in the Virginia, Maryland and North Carolina markets represented approximately 69%56%, 18%, and 15%18%, respectively, of the total annualized base rent of the properties in our portfolio. Furthermore, many of our properties are located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach, and rental revenues from our Town Center properties represented 41%31% of our total rental revenues.revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019. As a result of this geographic concentration, we are particularly susceptible to adverse economic, regulatory or other conditions in the Virginia, marketMaryland and North Carolina markets (such as periods of economic slowdown or recession, business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, increases in real estate and other taxes, and the cost of complying with governmental regulations or increased regulation), as well as to natural disasters that occur in these markets (such as hurricanes and other events). For example, the markets in Virginia, Maryland, and North Carolina in which many of the properties in our portfolio are located contain high concentrations of military personnel and operations. Aoperations, and a reduction of the military presence or cuts in defense spending in these markets could have a material adverse effect on us. If there is a downturn in the economy in Virginia, Maryland or North Carolina, our operations, and our revenue, and cash

available for distribution, including cash available to pay distributions to our stockholders, could be materially and adversely affected. We cannot assure you that these markets will grow or that underlying real estate fundamentals will be favorable to owners and operators of office, retail, or multifamily properties. Our operations may also be adversely affected if competing properties are built in these markets. Moreover, submarkets within any of our target markets may be dependent upon a limited number of industries. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in our markets, or any decrease in demand for office, retail or multifamily space resulting from the regulatory environment, business climate or energy or fiscal problems, could materially and adversely affect us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.  


We have a substantial amount of indebtedness outstanding, which may expose us to the risk of default under our debt obligations and may include covenants that restrict our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
 
As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had total debt outstanding of approximately $522.2$950.5 million, including amounts drawn under our credit facility, a substantial portion of which is guaranteed by our Operating Partnership, and we may incur significant additional debt to finance future acquisition and development activities. Excluding unamortized fair value adjustments and debt issuance costs, the aggregate outstanding principal balance of our debt was $527.1$960.8 million as of December 31, 2016.2019. Payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash resources to operate our properties or to pay the dividends currently contemplated or necessary to maintain our REIT qualification. Our level of debt and the limitations imposed on us by our debt agreements could have significant adverse consequences, including the following:  


our cash flow may be insufficient to meet our required principal and interest payments;


we may be unable to borrow additional funds as needed or on favorable terms, which could, among other things, adversely affect our ability to meet operational needs;


we may be unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or the refinancing terms may be less favorable than the terms of our original indebtedness;


we may be forced to dispose of one or more of our properties, possibly on unfavorable terms or in violation of certain covenants to which we may be subject;



we may default on our obligations, in which case the lenders or mortgagees may have the right to foreclose on any properties that secure the loans or collect rents and other income from our properties;


we may violate restrictive covenants in our loan documents, which would entitle the lenders to accelerate our debt obligations or reduce our ability to pay, or prohibit us from paying, distributions to our stockholders; and


our default under any loan with cross defaultcross-default provisions could result in a default on other indebtedness.
 
If any one of these events were to occur, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow, cash available for distribution, and ability to service our debt obligations could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, foreclosures could create taxable income without accompanying cash proceeds, which could hinder our ability to meet the REIT distribution requirements imposed by the Code. See “Management’s"Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”"
The loss of, or a store closure by, one of the anchor stores or major tenants in our retail shopping center properties could result in a material decrease in our rental income, which would have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution and our ability to service our debt obligations.
Our retail shopping center properties typically are anchored by large, nationally recognized tenants. As of December 31, 2016, Kroger/Harris Teeter, Home Depot, Bed Bath & Beyond and Regal Cinemas collectively represented approximately 22.2%, and individually represented 11.5%, 4.3%, 3.3% and 3.1%, respectively, of the total annualized base rent in our retail portfolio. In addition, several of our retail properties are single-tenant properties or are occupied primarily by a single tenant. As of December 31, 2016, the Courthouse 7-Eleven, Tyre Neck Harris Teeter and Harrisonburg Regal retail properties in our portfolio were 100% occupied by 7-Eleven, Harris Teeter and Regal Cinemas, respectively, and the Dick’s at Town Center, Sandbridge Commons, Perry Hall Marketplace and Studio 56 retail properties were approximately 81%, 77%, 74% and 69% occupied by Dick’s Sporting Goods, Harris Teeter, Safeway and McCormick & Schmick’s, respectively. At any time, our tenants may experience a downturn in their business that may weaken significantly their financial condition. As a result, our tenants, including our anchor and other major tenants, may fail to comply with their contractual obligations to us, seek concessions in order to continue operations or declare bankruptcy, any of which could result in the termination of such tenants’ leases and the loss of rental income attributable to the terminated leases. In addition, certain of our tenants may cease operations while continuing to pay rent, which could decrease customer traffic, thereby decreasing sales for our other tenants at the applicable retail property. Furthermore, mergers or consolidations among retail establishments could result in the closure of existing stores or duplicate or geographically overlapping store locations, which could include stores at our retail properties.  
Loss of, or a store closure by, an anchor or major tenant could significantly reduce our occupancy level or the rent we receive from our retail properties, and we may not have the right to re-lease vacated space or we may be unable to re-lease vacated space at attractive rents or at all. Moreover, in the event of default by a major tenant or anchor store, we may experience delays and costs in enforcing our rights as landlord to recover amounts due to us under the terms of our agreements with those parties. The occurrence of any of the situations described above, particularly if it involves an anchor tenant with leases in multiple locations, could seriously harm our performance and could adversely affect the value of the affected retail property.
In the event that any of the anchor stores, major tenants or single-tenant property tenants in our retail properties do not renew their leases with us when they expire, we may be unable to re-lease such premises at market rents, or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and cash available for distribution and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations.

We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space, or re-lease space on favorable terms or at all as leases expire, which could materially and adversely affect us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
As of December 31, 2016,2019, approximately 7%3.4% of the square footage of the properties in our stabilized core office and retail portfolios was available. Additionally, 2.3%2.2% and 11.7%3.8% of the annualized base rent in our office portfolio was scheduled to expire in 20172020 and 2018,2021, respectively, and 7.1%5.3% and 10.5%10.1% of the annualized base rent in our retail portfolio was scheduled to expire in 20172020 and 2018,2021, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, approximately 23% of our 4525 Main Street office property was available. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, 4525 Main Street is 93% leased. We cannot assure you that new leases will be entered into, that leases will be renewed, or that our properties will be re-leased at net effective rental rates equal to or above the current average net effective rental rates or that substantial rent abatements, tenant improvements, early termination rights or below-market renewal options will not be offered to attract new tenants or retain existing tenants. In addition, our ability to

lease our multifamily properties at favorable rates, or at all, may be adversely affected by the increase in supply of multifamily properties in our target markets. Our ability to lease our properties depends upon the overall level of spending in the economy, which is adversely affected by, among other things, job losses and unemployment levels, fears of a recession, personal debt levels, the housing market, stock market

volatility, and uncertainty about the future. If rental rates for our properties decrease, our existing tenants do not renew their leases, or we do not re-lease a significant portion of our available space and space for which leases expire, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distributionsdistribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations could be materially and adversely affected.  


The short-term leases in our multifamily portfolio expose us to the effects of declining market rents, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow and cash available for distribution.


Substantially all of the leases in our multifamily portfolio are for terms of 12 months or less. As a result, even if we are able to renew or re-lease apartment and student housing units as leases expire, our rental revenues will be impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if all of our leases had longer terms, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flow, and cash available for distribution.


Competition for property acquisitions and development opportunities may reduce the number of opportunities available to us and increase our costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects.
 
The current market for property acquisitions and development opportunities continues to be extremely competitive. This competition may increase the demand for the types of properties in which we typically invest and, therefore, reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us and increase the purchase prices for such properties in the event we are able to acquire or develop such properties. We face significant competition for attractive investment opportunities from an indeterminate number of investors, including publicly traded and privately held REITs, private equity investors, and institutional investment funds, some of which have greater financial resources than we do, a greater ability to borrow funds to make investments in properties than we do, and the ability to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of investments and the payment of higher acquisition prices. This competition will increase if investments in real estate become more attractive relative to other forms of investment. If the level of competition for investment opportunities is significant in our target markets, it could have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects. 


Increased competition and increased affordability of residential homes could limit our ability to retain our residents, lease apartment units, or increase or maintain rents at our multifamily apartment communities.


Our multifamily apartment communities compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including other multifamily apartment communities and single-family rental units, as well as owner-occupied single-single-family and multifamily units. Competitive housing in a particular area and an increase in affordability of owner-occupied single-single-family and multifamily units due to, among other things, declining housing prices, oversupply, mortgage interest rates, and tax incentives and government programs to promote home ownership, could adversely affect our ability to retain residents, lease apartment units, and increase or maintain rents at our multifamily properties, which could adversely impact our results of operations, cash flow, and cash available for distribution.
 
The failure of properties that we develop or acquire in the future to meet our financial expectations could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, ability to service our debt obligations, the per share trading price of our common stock, and our growth prospects.
 
Our future acquisitions and development projects and our ability to successfully operate these properties may be exposed to the following significant risks, among others:


we may acquire or develop properties that are not accretive to our results upon acquisition, and we may not successfully manage and lease those properties to meet our expectations;


our cash flow may be insufficient to enable us to pay the required principal and interest payments on the debt secured by the property;


we may spend more than budgeted amounts to make necessary improvements or renovations to acquired properties or to develop new properties;


we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions or developed properties into our existing operations;


market conditions may result in higher than expected vacancy rates and lower than expected rental rates; and


we may acquire properties subject to liabilities without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities such as liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination, claims by tenants, vendors, or other persons dealing with the former owners of the properties, liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business, and claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers, and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties.
 
If we cannot operate acquired or developed properties to meet our financial expectations, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, ability to service our debt obligations, the per share trading price of our common stock, and growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.


Failure to succeed in new markets may limit our growth.
We have acquired in the past, and we may acquire in the future if appropriate opportunities arise, properties that are outside of our primary markets. Entering into new markets exposes us to a variety of risks, including difficulty evaluating local market conditions and local economies, developing new business relationships in the area, competing with other companies that already have an established presence in the area, hiring and retaining key personnel, evaluating quality tenants in the area, and a lack of familiarity with local governmental and permitting procedures. Furthermore, expansion into new markets may divert management time and other resources.resources away from our current primary markets. As a result, we may not be successful in expanding into new markets, which could adversely impact our business,financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and ability to service our debt obligations.
Mezzanine loans and similar loan investments are subject to significant risks, and losses related to these investments could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We dependhave originated, and in the future expect to originate or acquire, mezzanine or similar loans, which take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on significant tenantsthe underlying property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the property or a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity that owns the interest in certainthe entity owning the property. As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately $153.0 million in outstanding mezzanine loans or similar investments. These types of loans involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage loans secured by income-producing real property because the loan may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In addition, these loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, with little or no equity invested by the borrower, increasing the risk of loss of principal. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt is paid in full. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our office properties, and an inabilityinitial investment. Additionally, in conjunction with certain mezzanine loans, we issue partial payment guarantees to pay rent by anythe senior lender for the property, which may require us to make payments to the senior lender in the event of these tenantsa default on the senior note. Finally, in connection with our loan investments, we may have options to purchase all or a portion of the underlying property upon maturity of the loan; however, if a developer’s costs for a project are higher than anticipated, exercising such options may not be attractive or economically feasible, or we may not have sufficient funds to exercise such options even if we desire to do so. Significant losses related to mezzanine or similar loan investments could result inhave a material decrease in our rental income, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and cash available for distribution.operations.
As of December 31, 2016, the top ten largest tenants in our office portfolio collectively accounted for approximately 52.1% of the total annualized base rent in our office portfolio. Furthermore, Clark Nexsen, Hampton University and the Commonwealth of Virginia accounted for 13.1%, 5.4% and 4.7%, respectively, of the total annualized base rent in our office portfolio as of December 31, 2016. The inability of these or other significant tenants to pay rent or renew their leases upon expiration could materially and adversely affect the income produced by our office properties, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations and cash available for distribution.


A bankruptcy or insolvency of any of our significant tenants in our office or retail properties could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
If a significant tenant in our office or retail properties becomes bankrupt or insolvent, federal law may prohibit us from evicting such tenant based solely upon such bankruptcy or insolvency. In addition, a bankrupt or insolvent tenant may be authorized to reject and terminate its lease with us. Any claim against such tenant for unpaid, future rent would be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent owed under the lease. If any of these tenants were to experience a downturn in its business or a weakening of its financial condition resulting in its failure to make timely rental payments or causing it to default under its lease, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment. In many cases, we may have made substantial initial investments in the applicable leases through tenant improvement allowances and other concessions that we may not be able to recover. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
Certain of the leases at our retail properties contain “co-tenancy” or “go-dark” provisions, which, if triggered, may allow tenants to pay reduced rent, cease operations or terminate their leases, any of which could materially adversely affect our performance or the value of the affected retail property.
Certain of the leases at our retail properties contain “co-tenancy” provisions that condition a tenant’s obligation to remain open, the amount of rent payable by the tenant or the tenant’s obligation to continue occupancy on certain conditions, including: (i) the presence of a certain anchor tenant or tenants, (ii) the continued operation of an anchor tenant’s store and (iii) minimum occupancy levels at the retail property. If a co-tenancy provision is triggered by a failure of any of these or other applicable conditions, a tenant could have the right to cease operations, to terminate its lease early or to reduce its rent. In periods of prolonged economic decline, there is a higher than normal risk that co-tenancy provisions will be triggered as there is a higher risk of tenants closing stores or terminating leases during these periods. In addition to these co-tenancy provisions, certain of the leases at our retail properties contain “go-dark” provisions that allow the tenant to cease operations while

continuing to pay rent. This could result in decreased customer traffic at the affected retail property, thereby decreasing sales for our other tenants at that property, which may result in our other tenants being unable to pay their minimum rents or expense recovery charges. These provisions also may result in lower rental revenue generated under the applicable leases. To the extent co-tenancy or go-dark provisions in our retail leases result in lower revenue or tenant sales or tenants’ rights to terminate their leases early or to a reduction of their rent, revenues and the value of the affected retail property could be materially adversely affected.
Our dependence on smaller businesses, particularly in our retail portfolio, to rent our space could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and results of operations.
Many of our tenants, particularly those that lease space in our retail properties are smaller businesses that generally do not have the financial strength or resources of larger corporate tenants. In particular, 234 of our retail leases (representing approximately 15% of our annualized base rent from retail properties as of December 31, 2016) lease 2,500 or less square feet from us, and many of those tenants are smaller independent businesses, which generally experience a higher rate of failure than larger businesses. As a result of our dependence on these smaller businesses, we could experience a higher rate of tenant defaults, turnover and bankruptcies, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and results of operations.
Many of our operating costs and expenses are fixed and will not decline if our revenues decline.
 
Our results of operations depend, in large part, on our level of revenues, operating costs, and expenses. The expense of owning and operating a property is not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as market factors and competition cause a reduction in revenue from the property. As a result, if revenues decline, we may not be able to reduce our expenses to keep pace with the corresponding reductions in revenues. Many of the costs associated with real estate investments, such as real estate taxes, insurance, loan payments, and maintenance generally will not be reduced if a property is not fully occupied or other circumstances cause our revenues to decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.


Adverse conditions in the general retail environment could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to satisfyservice our debt service obligations and to make distributions to our stockholders.obligations.
 
Approximately 57%47.3% of our total annualized base rent as of December 31, 20162019 is from retail properties. As a result, we are subject to factors that affect the retail sector generally as well as the market for retail space. The retail environment and the market for retail space have been, and in the future could be, adversely affected by weakness in the national, regional, and local economies, the level of consumer spending and consumer confidence, the adverse financial condition of some large retail companies, the ongoing consolidation in the retail sector, the excess amount of retail space in a number of markets, and increasing competition from discount retailers, outlet malls, internet retailers, and other online businesses. Increases in consumer spending via the internet may significantly affect our retail tenants’ ability to generate sales in their stores. New and enhanced technologies, including new digital technologies and new web services technologies, may increase competition for certain of our retail tenants.
 
Any of the foregoing factors could adversely affect the financial condition of our retail tenants and the willingness of retailers to lease space in our retail properties.properties, including the anchor stores or major tenants in our retail shopping center properties, the loss of which could result in a material impact on our retail tenants. In turn, these conditions could negatively affect market rents for retail space and could materially and adversely affect us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distributionsdistribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
Increases in interest rates, or failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes, will increase our interest expense and may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and ability to pay distributions.service our debt obligations.
 
We have incurred, and may in the future incur, additional indebtedness that bears interest at a variable rate. An increase in interest rates would increase our interest expense and increase the cost of refinancing existing debt and issuing new debt, which would adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. In addition, to the extent we are unable to refinance debt when it becomes due, we will have fewer debt guarantee opportunities available to offer under our tax protection agreements, which could trigger an obligation to indemnify certain parties under the applicable tax protection agreements. Furthermore, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments at times that may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments. The effect of prolonged interest rate increases could adversely impact our ability to make acquisitions and develop properties.
    
Subject to maintaining our qualification as a REIT, we expect to continue to enter into hedging transactions to protect us from the effects of interest rate fluctuations on floating rate debt. Our existing hedging transactions have included, and future hedging transactions may include, entering into interest rate cap agreements or interest rate swap agreements, which involve risk. Our failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and ability to service our debt obligations.

The phase-out of LIBOR and transition to SOFR as a benchmark interest rate could have adverse effects.

The interest rate on our variable rate debt is based on LIBOR (the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate). In 2018, the Alternative Reference Rate Committee identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the alternative to LIBOR. SOFR is a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities, published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. By the end of 2021, it is expected that no new contracts will reference LIBOR and will instead use SOFR. Due to the broad use of LIBOR as a reference rate, all financial market participants, including us, are impacted by the risks associated with this transition and, therefore, it could adversely affect our operations and cash flows.

Mortgage debt obligations expose us to the possibility of foreclosure, which could result in the loss of our investment in a property or group of properties subject to mortgage debt.
 
Mortgage and other secured debt obligations increasesincrease our risk of property losses because defaults on indebtedness secured by properties may result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and ultimately our loss of the property securing any loans for which we are in default. Any foreclosure on a mortgaged property or group of properties could adversely affect the overall value of our portfolio of properties. For tax purposes, a foreclosure on any of our properties that is subject to a nonrecourse mortgage loan would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds, which could hinder our ability to meet the REIT distribution requirements imposed by the Code. Foreclosures could also trigger our tax indemnification obligations under the terms of our tax protection agreements with respect to the sales of certain properties.

Most of our debt arrangements involve balloon payment obligations, which may materially adversely affect us, including our cash flows, financial condition and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Most of our debt arrangements require us to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or our ability to sell the property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the existing financing on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. In addition, balloon payments and payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Our credit facility restricts our ability to engage in certain business activities, including our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make capital expenditures, and make certain investments.
 
Our credit facility contains customary negative covenants and other financial and operating covenants that, among other things:


restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness;


restrict our ability to incur additional liens;


restrict our ability to make certain investments (including certain capital expenditures);


restrict our ability to merge with another company;


restrict our ability to sell or dispose of assets;


restrict our ability to make distributions to our stockholders; and


require us to satisfy minimum financial coverage ratios, minimum tangible net worth requirements, and maximum leverage ratios.
 
These limitations restrict our ability to engage in certain business activities, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations. In addition, our credit facility may contain specific cross-default provisions with respect to specified other indebtedness, giving the lenders the right, in certain circumstances, to declare a default if we are in default under other loans.
 
Adverse economic and geopolitical conditions and dislocations in the credit markets could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
Our business may be affected by market and economic challenges experienced by the U.S. economy or the real estate industry as a whole. Such conditions may materially and adversely affect us as a result of the following potential consequences, among others: 

decreased demand for office, retail and multifamily space, which would cause market rental rates and property values to be negatively impacted;



reduced values of our properties may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or obtain debt financing secured by our properties and may reduce the availability of unsecured loans;


our ability to obtain financing on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, or at all, may be limited, which could reduce our ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce our returns from our acquisition and development activities, and increase our future debt service expense; and


one or more lenders under our credit facility could refuse to fund their financing commitment to us or could otherwise fail to do so, and we may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms or at all.
 
If the U.S. economy experiences an economic downturn, we may see increases in bankruptcies of our tenants and increased defaults by our tenants, and we may experience higher vacancy rates and delays in re-leasing vacant space, which could negatively impact our business andfinancial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
FailureA cybersecurity incident or other technology disruptions could negatively impact our business, our relationships, and our reputation.

We use computers and computer networks in most aspects of our business operations. We also use mobile devices to hedge effectively against interest rate changescommunicate with our employees, suppliers, business partners, and tenants. These devices are used to transmit sensitive and confidential information including financial and strategic information about us, employees, business partners, tenants, and other individuals and organizations. Additionally, we utilize third-party service providers that host personally identifiable information and other confidential information of our employees, business partners, tenants, and others. We also maintain confidential financial and business information regarding us and persons and entities with which we do business on our information technology systems. We have in the past experienced cyberattacks on our computers and computer networks, and, while none to date have been material, we expect that additional cyberattacks will occur in the future. The theft, destruction, loss, or release of sensitive and confidential information or operational downtime of the systems used to store and transmit our or our tenants’ confidential business information could result in disruptions to our business, negative publicity, brand damage, violation of privacy laws, financial liability, difficulty attracting and retaining tenants, loss of business partners, and loss of business opportunities, any of which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.

Subject to maintainingAny material weakness in our qualification as a REIT, we expect to continue to enter into hedging transactions to protect us frominternal control over financial reporting could have an adverse effect on the effectstrading price of interest rate fluctuations on floating rate debt. Our existing hedging transactions have, and future hedging transactions may, include entering into interest rate cap agreements or interest rate swap agreements. These agreements involve risks, such as the risk that such arrangements would not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes or that a court could rule that such an agreement is not legally enforceable. In addition, interest rate hedging can be expensive, particularly during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. Hedging could increase our costs and reduce the overall returns on our investments. In addition, while hedging agreements would be intended to lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they could also expose us to the risk that the other parties to the agreements would not perform, that we could incur significant costs associated with the settlement of the agreements or that the underlying transactions could fail to qualify as highly-effective cash flow hedges under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging.  common stock.
 
We will continue to incur costs as a result of being a public company, and such costs may increase if and when we cease to be an “emerging growth company.”
As a public company, we expect to continue to incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements. The expenses incurred by public companies generally for reporting and corporate governance purposes have been increasing. We expect compliance with these public reporting requirements and associated rules and regulations to increase expenses, particularly after we are no longer an emerging growth company, although we are currently unable to estimate these costs with any degree of certainty. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years after our initial public offering, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, which could result in our incurring additional costs applicable to public companies that are not emerging growth companies. 
We will beManagement is required to have an independent auditor assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting when we cease to be an "emerging growth company."
As long as we remain an emerging growth company, as that term is defined in the JOBS Act, we will be permitted to gradually comply with certain of the on-going reporting and disclosure obligations of public companies pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. However, after we are no longer an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act, management will be required to have an independent auditor assess the effectiveness of our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Substantial work on our part is required to implement appropriate processes, document the system of internal control over key processes, assess their design, remediate any deficiencies identified and test their operation. This process is expected to be both costly and challenging. We cannot give any assurances that material weaknesses will not be identified in the future in connection with our compliance with the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The existence of any material weakness described above would preclude a conclusion by management and our independent auditors that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. Our management may be required to devote significant time and expense to remediate any material weaknesses that may be discovered and may not be able to remediate anysuch material weaknessweaknesses in a timely manner. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we were require to document internal control processes and provide self-certification of those processes. The existence of any material weakness in our

internal control over financial reporting could also result in errors in our financial statements that could require us to restate our financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, allany of which could lead to a decline in the per share trading price of our common stock.


We may be required to make rent or other concessions or significant capital expenditures to improve our properties in order to retain and attract tenants, which may materially and adversely affect us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distributionsdistribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
Upon expiration of our leases to our tenants, to the extent that adverse economic conditions in the real estate market reduce the demand for office, retail and multifamily space, we may be required to make rent or other concessions, accommodate requests for renovations, build-to-suit remodeling, and other improvements, or provide additional services to our tenants, any of which would increase our costs. As a result, we may have to make significant capital or other expenditures in order to retain tenants whose leases expire and to attract new tenants in sufficient numbers. Additionally, we may need to raise capital to make such expenditures. If we are unable to do so or capital is otherwise unavailable, we may be unable to make the required expenditures. This could result in non-renewals by tenants upon expiration of their leases. If any of the foregoing were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
Our use of units in our Operating Partnership as currency to acquire properties could result in stockholder dilution or limit our ability to sell such properties, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
 
We have acquired, and in the future we may acquire, properties or portfolios of properties through tax deferred contribution transactions in exchange for OP Units. In particular, we issued OP Units in connection with our acquisition of certain properties during 2016 and intend to issue additional OP Units in connection with certain property acquisitions during 2017, as discussed in “Item 1 – Business – Acquisitions and Dispositions.” This acquisition structure may have the effect of, among other things, reducing the amount of tax depreciation we could deduct over the tax life of the acquired properties and may requirerequiring that we agree to protect the contributors’ ability to defer recognition of taxable gain through restrictions on our ability to dispose of the

acquired properties or the allocation of partnership debt to the contributors to maintain their tax bases. These restrictions also could limit our ability to sell properties at a time, or on terms, that would be favorable absent such restrictions. In addition, future issuances of OP Units would reduce our ownership percentage in our Operating Partnership and affect the amount of distributions made to us by our Operating Partnership and, therefore, the amount of distributions we can make to our stockholders. To the extent that our stockholders do not directly own OP Units, our stockholders will not have any voting rights with respect to any such issuances or other partnership level activities of our Operating Partnership.

Significant competition in the leasing market could have a material adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution and our ability to service our debt obligations.
We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of real estate, many of which own properties similar to ours in the same submarkets in which our properties are located. If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates, or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose existing or potential tenants and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge or to offer more substantial rent abatements, tenant improvements, early termination rights or below-market renewal options in order to retain tenants when our tenants’ leases expire. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distributions and our ability to service our debt obligations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our success depends on key personnel whose continued service is not guaranteed, and the loss of one or more of our key personnel could adversely affect our ability to manage our business and to implement our growth strategies or could create a negative perception of our company in the capital markets.
 
Our continued success and our ability to manage anticipated future growth depend, in large part, upon the efforts of key personnel particularly Messrs. Hoffler (our Executive Chairman), Kirk (our Vice Chairman), Haddad (our President and Chief Executive Officer), Apperson (our President of Construction), O’Hara (our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer), and Smith (our Chief Investment Officer and Corporate Secretary) and Ms. Hampton (our President of Asset Management), who have extensive market knowledge and relationships and exercise substantial influence over our operational, financing, development, and construction activity. Among the reasons that these individuals are important to our success is thatIndividuals currently considered key personnel each has a national or regional industry reputation that attracts business and investment opportunities and assists us in negotiations with lenders, existing and potential tenants, and industry personnel.personnel, and we have not currently entered into employment agreements with any of these individuals. If we lose their services, our relationships with such industry personnel could diminish.
 

Many of our other senior executives also have extensive experience and strong reputations in the real estate industry, which aid us in identifying opportunities, having opportunities brought to us, and negotiating with tenants and build-to-suit prospects. The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management team, or our inability to attract and retain highly qualified personnel, could adversely affect our business, diminish our investment opportunities, and weaken our relationships with lenders, business partners, existing and prospective tenants, and industry participants, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and the per share trading price of our common stock.

We may not be subjectable to on-goingrebuild our existing properties to their existing specifications if we experience a substantial or future litigation,comprehensive loss of such properties, including existing claims relating to the entities that owned the properties prior to our initial public offering and otherwise in the ordinary courseas a result of business, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and the per share trading price of our common stock.hurricanes or other disasters.

We may be subject to on-going litigation, including existing claims relating to the entities that owned the properties and operated the businesses prior to our initial public offering and otherwise in the ordinary course of business. Some of these claims may result in significant defense costs and potentially significant judgments against us, some of which are not, or cannot be, insured against. We generally intend to vigorously defend ourselves. However, we cannot be certain of the ultimate outcomes of currently asserted claims or of those that may arise in the future. In addition, we may become subject to litigation in connection with the formation transactions related to our initial public offering in the event that prior investors dispute the valuationwe experience a substantial or comprehensive loss of their respective interests, the adequacy of the consideration received by them in the formation transactions or the interpretation of the agreements implementing the formation transactions. Resolution of these types of matters against us may result in our having to pay significant fines, judgments, or settlements, which, if uninsured, or if the fines, judgments, and settlements exceed insured levels, could adversely impact our earnings and cash flows, thereby having an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution and our ability to service our debt obligations. Certain litigation or the resolution of certain litigation may affect the availability or cost of someone of our insurance coverage, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows, expose us to increased risks that would be uninsured and adversely impact our ability to attract officers and directors.
Potential losses from hurricanes in Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina and South Carolinaproperties, we may not be covered by insurance. 
Allable to rebuild such property to its existing specifications. For example, all but two of the properties in our portfolio as of December 31, 20162019 are located in Maryland, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and South Carolina, and Georgia, which are areas particularly susceptible to hurricanes. While we carry insurance on certain of our properties, the amount of our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to fully cover losses from hurricanes and will be subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments. In addition, we may reduce or discontinue insurance on some or all of our properties in the future if the cost of premiums for any such policies exceeds, in our judgment, the value of the coverage discounted for the risk of loss. As a result, in the event of a hurricane, we may be required to incur significant costs, and, to the extent that a loss exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged.  
We may not be able to rebuild our existing properties to their existing specifications if we experience a substantial or comprehensive loss of such properties.
In the event that we experience a substantial or comprehensive loss of one of our properties, we may not be able to rebuild such property to its existing specifications. Further, reconstruction or improvement of such a propertyproperties would likely require significant upgrades to meet zoning and building code requirements. Environmental and legal restrictions could also restrict the rebuilding of our properties.

Joint venture investments could be materially and adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on co-venturers’ financial condition, and disputes between us and our co-venturers.

In the past, we have, and in the future, we expect to, co-invest with third parties through partnerships, joint ventures or other entities, acquiring noncontrolling interests in or sharing responsibility for developing properties and managing the affairs of a property, partnership, joint venture, or other entity. In particular, in connection with the formation transactions related to our initial public offering, we provided certain of the prior investors with the right to co-develop certain projects with us in the future and the right to acquire a minority equity interest in certain properties that we may develop in the future, in each case under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions set forth in the applicable agreement. Furthermore, as of December 31, 2016,2019, we were 70%, 65%, 80%, 80%, 80% and 37%the 90% joint venture partnerspartner in our Lightfoot Marketplace, Brooks Crossing, Johns Hopkins Village, Town Center Phase VI, HardingSummit Place and City Center development projects, respectively.

Subsequent to December 31, 2016, we acquired the remaining 20% interest in Town Center Phase VI.project. In the event that we co-develop a property together with a third party, we would be required to share a portion of the development fee. With respect to any such arrangement or any similar arrangement that we may enter into in the future, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the development, property, partnership, joint venture, or other entity.
Investments in partnerships, joint ventures or other entities may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present where a third party is not involved, including the possibility that partners or co-venturers might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Partners or co-venturers may have economic or other business interests or goals which are inconsistent with our business interests or goals and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives, and they may have competing interests in our markets that could create conflicts of interest. Such investments may also have the potential risk of impasses on decisions, such as a sale or financing, because neither we nor the partner(s) or co-venturer(s) would have full control over the partnership or joint venture. In addition, a sale or transfer by us to a third party of

our interests in the joint venture may be subject to consent rights or rights of first refusal, in favor of our joint venture partners, which would in each case restrict our ability to dispose of our interest in the joint venture.

Where we are a limited partner or non-managing member in any partnership or limited liability company, if such entity takes or expects to take actions that could jeopardize our status as a REIT or require us to pay tax, we may be forced to dispose of our interest in such entity. Disputes between us and partners or co-venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. Consequently, actions by or disputes with partners or co-venturers might result in subjecting properties owned by the partnership or joint venture to additional risk. In addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our third-party partners or co-venturers. Our joint ventures may be subject to debt and, during periods of volatile credit markets, the refinancing of such debt may require equity capital calls.  
Mezzanine loans and similar loan investments are subject to significant risks, and losses related to these investments could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. 
We have originated, and may in the future originate or acquire, mezzanine or similar loans, which take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the property or a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the property. These types of loans involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage loans secured by income-producing real property because the loan may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In addition, these loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt is paid in full. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our initial investment. In addition, in connection with our loan investments, we may have options to purchase all or a portion of the underlying property upon maturity of the loan; however, if a developer’s costs for a project are higher than anticipated, exercising such options may not be attractive or economically feasible, or we may not have sufficient funds to exercise such options even if desire to do so. Significant losses related to mezzanine or similar loan investments could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.


Our growth depends on external sources of capital that are outside of our control and may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could limit our ability to, among other things, meet our capital and operating needs or make the cash distributions to our stockholders necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
 
In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required under the Code to, among other things, distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain. In addition, we will be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including any net capital gains. Because of these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund future capital needs, including any necessary capital expenditures, from operating cash flow. Consequently, we intend to rely on third-party sources to fund our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain such financing on favorable terms or at all and any additional debt we incur will increase our leverage and likelihood of default. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends, in part, on: 


general market conditions;


the market’s perception of our growth potential;


our current debt levels;



our current and expected future earnings;


our cash flow and cash distributions; and

the market price per share of our common stock.
 
If we cannot obtain capital from third-party sources, we may not be able to acquire or develop properties when strategic opportunities exist, meet the capital and operating needs of our existing properties, satisfy our debt service obligations or make the cash distributions to our stockholders necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Expectations of our company relating to environmental, social and governance factors may impose additional costs and expose us to new risks.

There is an increasing focus from certain investors, tenants, employees, and other stakeholders concerning corporate responsibility, specifically related to environmental, social and governance factors. Some investors may use these factors to guide their investment strategies and, in some cases, may choose not to invest in us if they believe our policies relating to corporate responsibility are inadequate. Third-party providers of corporate responsibility ratings and reports on companies have increased to meet growing investor demand for measurement of corporate responsibility performance. In addition, the criteria by which companies’ corporate responsibility practices are assessed may change, which could result in greater expectations of us and cause us to undertake costly initiatives to satisfy such new criteria.  Alternatively, if we elect not to or are unable to satisfy such new criteria, investors may conclude that our policies with respect to corporate responsibility are inadequate. We may face reputational damage in the event that our corporate responsibility procedures or standards do not meet the standards set by various constituencies. Furthermore, if our competitors’ corporate responsibility performance is perceived to be greater than ours, potential or current investors may elect to invest with our competitors instead. In addition, in the event that we communicate certain initiatives and goals regarding environmental, social and governance matters, we could fail, or be perceived to fail, in our achievement of such initiatives or goals, or we could be criticized for the scope of such initiatives or goals.  If we fail to satisfy the expectations of investors, tenants and other stakeholders or our initiatives are not executed as planned, our reputation and financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

We may not be ablesubject to sustainongoing or future litigation, including existing claims relating to the entities that owned the properties prior to our growth rate level.

Sinceinitial public offering and otherwise in the ordinary course of business, which could have a material adverse effect on our inception, we have achieved significant growth in our portfolio andfinancial condition, results of operations. We may not be able to sustain this level of growth, and over time we may experience a decline in our growth rate as a result of various factors, including our ability to successfully acquire and develop retail, office and multifamily properties, changes inoperations, cash flow, the economic and other conditions in geographic markets in which we conduct business, changes in the real estate market generally, the competitiveness of the real estate market and the other risks discussed in this section, which could adversely affect the marketper share trading price of our common stock.stock, cash available for distribution, and ability to service our debt obligations.


We may be subject to ongoing or future litigation, including existing claims relating to the entities that owned the properties and operated the businesses prior to our initial public offering and otherwise in the ordinary course of business. Some of these claims may result in significant defense costs and potentially significant judgments against us, some of which are not, or cannot be, insured against. We generally intend to vigorously defend ourselves; however, we cannot be certain of the ultimate outcomes of currently asserted claims or of those that may arise in the future. In addition, we may become subject to litigation in connection with the formation transactions related to our initial public offering in the event that prior investors dispute the valuation of their respective interests, the adequacy of the consideration received by them in the formation transactions or the interpretation of the agreements implementing the formation transactions. Resolution of these types of matters against us may result in our having to pay significant fines, judgments, or settlements, which, if uninsured, or if the fines, judgments, and settlements exceed insured levels, could adversely impact our earnings and cash flow, thereby having an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, the per share trading price of our common stock, cash available for distribution, and ability to service our debt obligations. Certain litigation or the resolution of certain litigation may affect the availability or cost of some of our insurance coverage, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow, expose us to increased risks that would be uninsured, and adversely impact our ability to attract officers and directors.

Risks Related to Our Third-Party Construction Business
 
Adverse economic and regulatory conditions, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic region, could adversely affect our construction and development business, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
Our third-party construction activities have been, and are expected to continue to be, primarily focused in the Mid-Atlantic region, although we have also historically undertaken construction projects in various states in the Southeast, Northeast, and Midwest regions of the United States.U.S. As a result of our concentration of construction projects in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States,U.S., we are particularly susceptible to adverse economic or other conditions in markets in this marketregion (such as periods of economic slowdown or recession, business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, labor disruptions, and the costs of complying with governmental regulations or increased regulation), as well as to natural disasters that occur in this region. We cannot assure you that our target markets will support construction and development projects of the type in which we typically engage. While we have the ability to provide a wide range of development and construction services, any adverse economic or real estate developments in the Mid-Atlantic region could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
There can be no assurance that all of the projects for which our construction business is engaged as general contractor will be commenced or completed in their entirety in accordance with the anticipated cost, or that we will achieve the financial results we expect from the construction of such properties, which could materially and adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations, cash flow, and growth prospects.
 
OurFor serving as general contractor, our construction business earns profit for serving as general contractor equal to the difference between the total construction fees that we charge and the costs that we incur to build a property. If the decision is made by a third-party client to abandon a construction project for any reason, our anticipated fee revenue from such project could be significantly lower than we expect. In addition, we defer pre-contract costs when such costs are directly associated with specific anticipated construction contracts and their recovery is deemed probable. In the event that we determine that the execution of a construction contract is no longer probable, we would be required to expense those pre-contract costs in the period in which such determination is made, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations in such period. Our ability to complete the projects in our construction pipeline on time and on budget could be materially and adversely affected as a result of the following factors, among others: 


shortages of subcontractors, equipment, materials, or skilled labor;


unscheduled delays in the delivery of ordered materials and equipment;


unanticipated increases in the cost of equipment, labor, and raw materials;

unforeseen engineering, environmental, or geological problems;


weather interferences;


difficulties in obtaining necessary permits or in meeting permit conditions;


client acceptance delays; or


work stoppages and other labor disputes.
 
If we do not complete construction projects on time and on budget, it could have a material adverse effect on us, including our cash flows, results of operations, cash flow, and growth prospects.
 
Our dependence on third-party subcontractors and equipment and material providers could result in material shortages and project delays and could reduce our profits or result in project losses, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
 
Because our construction business provides general contracting services, we rely on third-party subcontractors and equipment and material providers. For example, we procure equipment and construction materials as needed when engaged in large construction projects. To the extent that we cannot engage subcontractors or acquire equipment and materials at reasonable costs or if the amount we are required to pay for subcontractors or equipment exceeds our estimates, our ability to complete a construction project in a timely fashion or at a profit may be impaired. In addition, if a subcontractor or a manufacturer is unable to deliver its services, equipment, or materials according to the negotiated terms for any reason, including the deterioration of its financial condition, we may be required to purchase the services, equipment, or materials from another source at a higher price. Additionally, while our construction contracts generally provide that our obligation to pay subcontractors is expressly made subject to the condition precedent that we shall have first received payment, we cannot assure you that these so called “pay-if-paid”"pay-if-paid" or “pay-when-paid”"pay-when-paid" provisions will be recognized in all jurisdictions in which we do business, or that a subcontractor or payment bond surety may not otherwise be entitled to payment or to record a lien on the affected property. In such event, we may be required to pay a payment bond surety or the subcontractors we engage even though we have yet to receive our fees as general contractor. This may reduce the profit to be realized or result in a loss on a project for which the services, equipment, or materials are needed, which may materially and adversely affect us, including our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
 
Our construction business recognizes certain revenue on a percentage-of-completion basisusing the input method and upon the achievement of contractual milestones, and any delay or cancellation of a construction project could materially and adversely affect our cash flowsflow and results of operations.
 
Our construction business recognizes certain revenue on a percentage-of-completion basisusing the input method and, as a result, revenue from our construction business is driven by the performance of our contractual obligations. The percentage-of-completioninput method of accounting is inherently subjective because it relies on estimates of total project cost as a basis for recognizing revenue and profit. Accordingly, revenue and profit recognized under the percentage-of-completioninput method is potentially subject to adjustments in subsequent periods based on refinements in the estimated cost to complete a project, which could result in a reduction or reversal of previously recorded revenues and profits. In addition, delays in, or the cancellation of, any particular construction project could adversely impact our ability to recognize revenue in a particular period. Furthermore, changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income in the period in which they are determined. If any of the foregoing were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our cash flowsflow and results of operations.


Construction project sites are inherently dangerous workplaces, and, as a result, our failure to maintain safe construction project sites could result in deaths or injuries, reduced profitability, the loss of projects or clients, and possible exposure to litigation, any of which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and reputation.
 
Construction and maintenance sites often put our employees, employees of subcontractors, our tenants, and members of the public in close proximity with mechanized equipment, moving vehicles, chemical and manufacturing processes, and highly regulated materials. On many sites, we are responsible for safety and, accordingly, must implement appropriate safety procedures. If we fail to implement these procedures or if the procedures we implement are ineffective, we may suffer the loss of or injury to our employees, fines, or expose our tenants and members of the public to potential injury, thereby creating exposure to litigation. As a result, our failure to maintain adequate safety standards could result in reduced profitability or the loss of projects, clients, and tenants, which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and our reputation.
 

Supply shortages and other risks associated with demand for skilled labor could increase construction costs and delay performance of our obligations under construction contracts, which could materially and adversely affect the profitability of our construction business, our cash flow, and our results of operations.
 
There is a high level of competition in the construction industry for skilled labor. Increased costs, labor shortages, or other disruptions in the supply of skilled labor, such as carpenters, roofers, electricians, and plumbers, could cause increases in construction costs and construction delays. We may not be able to pass on increases in construction costs because of market conditions or negotiated contractual terms. Sustained increases in construction costs due to competition for skilled labor and delays in performance under construction contracts may materially and adversely affect the profitability of our construction business, our financial condition,cash flow, and results of operations and cash flow.operations.
 
Our failure to successfully and profitably bid on construction contracts could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
 
Many of the costs related to our construction business, such as personnel costs, are fixed and are incurred by us irrespective of the level of activity of our construction business. The success of our construction business depends, in part, on our ability to successfully and profitably bid on construction contracts for private and public sector clients. Contract proposals and negotiations are complex and frequently involve a lengthy bidding and selection process, which can be impacted by a number of factors, many of which are outside our control, including market conditions, financing arrangements, and required governmental approvals. If we are unable to maintain a consistent backlog of third-party construction contracts, our results of operations and cash flow could be materially and adversely affected.
 
If we fail to timely complete a construction project, miss a required performance standard, or otherwise fail to adequately perform on a construction project, we may incur losses or financial penalties, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, ability to service our debt obligations, and reputation.
 
We may contractually commit to a construction client that we will complete a construction project by a scheduled date at a fixed cost. We may also commit that a construction project, when completed, will achieve specified performance standards. If the construction project is not completed by the scheduled date or fails to meet required performance standards, we may either incur significant additional costs or be held responsible for the costs incurred by the client to rectify damages due to late completion or failure to achieve the required performance standards. In addition, completion of projects can be adversely affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including unavoidable delays from governmental inaction, public opposition, inability to obtain financing, weather conditions, unavailability of vendor materials, availabilities of subcontractors, changes in the project scope of services requested by our clients, industrial accidents, environmental hazards, labor disruptions, and other factors. In some cases, if we fail to meet required performance standards or milestone requirements, we may also be subject to agreed-upon financial damages in the form of liquidated damages, which are determined pursuant to the contract governing the construction project. To the extent that these events occur, the total costs of the project could exceed our estimates and our contracted cost and we could experience reduced profits or, in some cases, incur a loss on a project, which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and cash flow.ability to service our debt obligations. Failure to meet performance standards or complete performance on a timely basis could also adversely affect our reputation.
 

Unionization or work stoppages could have a material adverse effect on us.
 
From time to time, our construction business and the subcontractors we engage may use unionized construction workers, which requires us to pay the prevailing wage in a jurisdiction to such workers. Due to the highly labor-intensive and price-competitive nature of the construction business, the cost of unionization or prevailing wage requirements for new developments could be substantial, which could adversely affect our profitability. In addition, the use of unionized construction workers could cause us to become subject to organized work stoppages, which would materially and adversely affect our ability to meet our construction timetables and could significantly increase the cost of completing a construction project.
Risks Related to Our Development Business and Property Acquisitions
Our failure to establish new development relationships with public partners and expand our development relationships with existing public partners could have a material adverse effect on us, including our cash flows, results of operations and growth prospects.
Our growth strategy depends significantly on our ability to leverage our extensive experience in completing large, complex, mixed-use public/private projects to establish new relationships with public partners and expand our relationships with existing public partners. Future increases in our revenues may depend significantly on our ability to expand the scope of

the work we do with the state and local government agencies with which we currently have partnered and attract new state and local government agencies to undertake public/private development projects with us. Our ability to obtain new work with state and local governmental authorities on new public/private development and financing partnerships could be adversely affected by several factors, including decreases in state and local budgets, changes in administrations, the departure of government personnel with whom we have worked and negative public perceptions about public/private partnerships. In addition, to the extent that we engage in public/private partnerships in states or local communities in which we have not previously worked, we could be subject to risks associated with entry into new markets, such as lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, lack of business relationships in the area and unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures. If we fail to establish new relationships with public partners and expand our relationships with existing public partners, it could have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects.
We may be unable to identify and complete development opportunities and acquisitions of properties that meet our investment criteria, which may materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and growth prospects.
Our business and growth strategy involves the development and selective acquisition of office, retail and multifamily properties. We may expend significant management time and other resources, including out-of-pocket costs, in pursuing these investment opportunities. Our ability to complete development projects or acquire properties on favorable terms, or at all, may be exposed to the following significant risks: 

we may incur significant costs and divert management attention in connection with evaluating and negotiating potential development opportunities and acquisitions, including those that we are subsequently unable to complete;

agreements for the development or acquisition of properties are subject to conditions, which we may be unable to satisfy; and

we may be unable to obtain financing on favorable terms or at all.
If we are unable to identify attractive investment opportunities and successfully develop new properties, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and growth prospects could be materially adversely affected.

The risks associated with land holdings and related activities could have a material adverse effect on us, including our results of operations.
We hold options to acquire undeveloped parcels of land for future development and may in the future acquire additional land holdings for development. The risks inherent in purchasing, owning, and developing land increase as demand or rental rates for office, retail or multifamily properties decreases. Real estate markets are highly uncertain and volatile and, as a result, the value of undeveloped land has fluctuated significantly and may continue to fluctuate. In addition, carrying costs, including interest and other pre-development costs, can be significant and can result in losses or reduced profitability. If there are subsequent changes in the fair value of our undeveloped land holdings that cause us to determine that the fair value of our undeveloped land holdings is less than their carrying basis reflected in our financial statements plus estimated costs to sell, we may be required to take future impairment charges which would reduce our net income and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
The success of our activities to design, construct and develop properties in which we will retain an ownership interest is dependent, in part, on the availability of suitable undeveloped land at acceptable prices as well as our having sufficient liquidity to fund investments in such undeveloped land and subsequent development.
Our success in designing, constructing and developing projects for our own account depends, in part, upon the continued availability of suitable undeveloped land at acceptable prices. The availability of undeveloped land for purchase at favorable prices depends on a number of factors outside of our control, including the risk of competitive over-bidding on land and governmental regulations that restrict the potential uses of land. If the availability of suitable land opportunities decreases, the number of development projects we may be able to undertake could be reduced. In addition, our ability to make land purchases will depend upon us having sufficient liquidity or access to external sources of capital to fund such purchases. Thus, the lack of availability of suitable land opportunities and insufficient liquidity to fund the purchases of any such available land opportunities could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and growth prospects.


Our real estate development activities are subject to risks particular to development, such as unanticipated expenses, delays and other contingencies, any of which could materially adversely affect us, including our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
We engage in development and redevelopment activities and will be subject to the following risks associated with such activities: 

unsuccessful development or redevelopment opportunities could result in direct expenses to us and cause us to incur losses;

construction or redevelopment costs of a project may exceed original estimates, possibly making the project less profitable than originally estimated, or unprofitable;

occupancy rates and rents of a completed project may not be sufficient to make the project profitable; and

the availability and pricing of financing to fund our development activities on favorable terms or at all.
These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development or redevelopment activities once undertaken, any of which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.
There can be no assurance that all of the properties in our development pipeline will be completed in their entirety in accordance with the anticipated cost, or that we will achieve the results we expect from the development of such properties, which could materially adversely affect our growth prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
The development of the projects in our development pipeline are subject to numerous risks, many of which are outside of our control. The cost necessary to complete the development of our development pipeline could be materially higher than we anticipate. Because we generally intend to commence the construction phase of an office or retail project for our own account only where a substantial percentage of the commercial space is pre-leased, we could decide not to undertake construction on one or more of the projects in our development pipeline if our pre-leasing efforts are unsuccessful. Furthermore, if we are delayed in the completion of any development project, tenants may have the right to terminate pre-development leases, which could materially adversely affect the financial viability of the project. In addition, even if we decide to commence construction on a project, we can provide no assurances that we will complete any of the projects in our development pipeline on the anticipated schedule, or that, once completed, the properties in our development pipeline will achieve the results that we expect. If the development of the projects in our development pipeline is not completed in accordance with our anticipated timing or at the anticipated cost, or the properties fail to achieve the financial results we expect, it could have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Our option properties are subject to various risks, and we may not be able to acquire them.
We have options to acquire from certain of our officers and directors certain parcels of developable land. These parcels are exposed to many of the same risks that may affect the other properties in our portfolio. The terms of the option agreements relating to these parcels were not determined by arm’s-length negotiations, and such terms may be less favorable to us than those that may have been obtained through negotiations with third parties. In addition, it may become economically unattractive to exercise our options with respect to these parcels, which could cause us to decide not to exercise our option to purchase these parcels in the future. In such event, or in the event that the option agreements expire by their terms, the parcels could be sold to one of our competitors without restriction. Because our officers and directors own economic interests in these parcels, our decision to exercise or refrain from exercising such options will create conflicts of interest.

Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry
 
Our business is subject to risks associated with real estate assets and the real estate industry, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
Our ability to pay expected dividends to our stockholders depends on our ability to generate revenues in excess of expenses, scheduled principal payments on debt, and capital expenditure requirements. Events and conditions generally applicable to owners and operators of real property that are beyond our control may decrease cash available for distribution and

the value of our properties. These events include many of the risks set forth above under “—"—Risks Related to Our Business, ,”" as well as the following: 


oversupply or reduction in demand for office, retail, or multifamily space in our markets;


adverse changes in financial conditions of buyers, sellers, and tenants of properties;


vacancies or our inability to rent space on favorable terms, including possible market pressures to offer tenants rent abatements, tenant improvements, early termination rights, or below-market renewal options, and the need to periodically repair, renovate, and re-lease space;


increased operating costs, including insurance premiums, utilities, real estate taxes, and state and local taxes;


increased property taxes due to property tax changes or reassessments;

a favorable interest rate environment that may result in a significant number of potential residents of our multifamily apartment communities deciding to purchase homes instead of renting;


rent control or stabilization laws or other laws regulating rental housing, which could prevent us from raising rents to offset increases in operating costs;


civil unrest, acts of war, terrorist attacks, and natural disasters, including hurricanes, which may result in uninsured or underinsured losses;


decreases in the underlying value of our real estate;


changing submarket demographics; and


changing traffic patterns.
 
In addition, periods of economic downturn or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for real estate, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in rents or an increased incidence of defaults under existing leases, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and our ability to service our debt obligations.
 
Illiquidity of real estate investments could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties and harm our financial condition.
 
The real estate investments made, and to be made, by us are difficult to sell quickly. As a result, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in our portfolio in response to changing economic, financial, and investment conditions is limited.

Return of capital and realization of gains, if any, from an investment generally will occur upon disposition or refinancing of the underlying property. We may be unable to realize our investment objectives by disposition or refinancing at attractive prices within any given period of time or may otherwise be unable to complete any exit strategy. In particular, our ability to dispose of one or more properties within a specific time period is subject to certain limitations imposed by our tax protection agreements, as well as weakness in or even the lack of an established market for a property, changes in the financial condition or prospects of prospective purchasers, changes in national or international economic conditions, and changes in laws, regulations or fiscal policies of jurisdictions in which the property is located.
 
In addition, the Code imposes restrictions on a REIT’s ability to dispose of properties that are not applicable to other types of real estate companies. In particular, the tax laws applicable to REITs effectively require that we hold our properties for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forego or defer sales of properties that otherwise would be in our best interests. Therefore, we may not be able to vary our portfolio in response to economic or other conditions promptly or on favorable terms.

Our property taxestax protection agreements could increase due to property tax rate changes or reassessment, which would adversely impact our cash flows.
Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay some state and local taxes on our properties. The real property taxes on our properties may increase as property tax rates change or as our properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Therefore, the amount of property taxes we pay in the future may increase

substantially from what we have paid in the past. If the property taxes we pay increase, our cash flow would be adversely impacted, andlimit our ability to pay dividendssell or otherwise dispose of certain properties.

In connection with the formation transactions related to our stockholders couldinitial public offering, our Operating Partnership entered into tax protection agreements that provide that if we dispose of any interest in certain protected properties in a taxable transaction prior to the seventh (or, in a limited number of cases, the tenth) anniversary of the completion of the formation transactions, subject to certain exceptions, we will indemnify certain contributors, including Messrs. Hoffler, Haddad, Kirk, and Apperson and their respective affiliates and certain of our other officers, for their tax liabilities attributable to the built-in gain that existed with respect to such property interests as of the time of our initial public offering, and the tax liabilities incurred as a result of such tax protection payment. In addition, in connection with certain acquisitions completed since our initial public offering, we entered into tax protection agreements that require us to indemnify the contributors for their tax liabilities in the event that we dispose of the properties subject to the tax protection agreements, and may enter into similar agreements in connection with future property acquisitions. Therefore, although it may be adversely affected.in our stockholders’ best interests that we sell one of these properties, it may be economically prohibitive or unattractive for us to do so because of these obligations. Moreover, as a result of these potential tax liabilities, Messrs. Hoffler, Haddad, Kirk, and Apperson and certain of our other officers may have a conflict of interest with respect to our determination as to certain of our properties.
 
As an owner of real estate, we could incur significant costs and liabilities related to environmental matters.
 
Under various federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the environment, as a current or former owner or operator of real property, we may be liable for costs and damages resulting from the presence or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances, waste, or petroleum products at, on, in, under, or migrating from such property, including costs to investigate and clean up such contamination and liability for harm to natural resources. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such contamination, and the liability may be joint and several. These liabilities could be substantial and the cost of any required remediation, removal, fines, or other costs could exceed the value of the property and our aggregate assets. In addition, the presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at our properties may expose us to third-party liability for costs of remediation and personal or property damage or materially and adversely affect our ability to sell, lease, or develop our properties or to borrow using the properties as collateral. In addition, environmental laws may create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs to address such contamination. Moreover, if contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws may impose restrictions on the manner in which propertythe properties may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. See “Part"Part I—Business—Regulation.”"
 
Some of our properties have been or may be impacted by contamination arising from current or prior uses of the property, or adjacent properties, for commercial or industrial purposes. Such contamination may arise from spills of petroleum or hazardous substances or releases from tanks used to store such materials. For example, some of the tenants of properties in our retail portfolio operate gas stations or other businesses that utilize storage tanks to store petroleum products, propane, or wastes typically associated with automobile service or other operations conducted at the properties, and spills or leaks of hazardous materials from those storage tanks could expose us to liability. See “Part"Part I—Business—Regulation—Environmental Matters.”" In addition to the foregoing, while we obtained Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for each of the properties in our portfolio, the assessments are limited in scope and may have failed to identify all environmental conditions or concerns. For example, they do not generally include soil sampling, subsurface investigations or hazardous materials survey.surveys. Furthermore, we do not have current Phase I Environmental Site Assessment reports for all of the properties in our portfolio and, as such, may not be aware of all potential or existing environmental contamination liabilities at the properties in our portfolio. As a result, we could potentially incur material liability for these issues.
 

As the owner of the buildings on our properties, we could face liability for the presence of hazardous materials, such as asbestos or lead, or other adverse conditions, such as poor indoor air quality, in our buildings. Environmental laws govern the presence, maintenance, and removal of hazardous materials in buildings, and if we do not comply with such laws, we could face fines for such noncompliance. Also, we could be liable to third parties, such as occupants of the buildings, for damages related to exposure to hazardous materials or adverse conditions in our buildings, and we could incur material expenses with respect to abatement or remediation of hazardous materials or other adverse conditions in our buildings. In addition, some of our tenants may routinely may handle and use hazardous or regulated substances and wastes as part of their operations at our properties, which are subject to regulation. Such environmental and health and safety laws and regulations could subject us or our tenants to liability resulting from these activities. Environmental liabilities could affect a tenant’s ability to make rental payments to us, and changes in laws could increase the potential liability for noncompliance. This may result in significant unanticipated expenditures or may otherwise materially and adversely affect our operations, or those of our tenants, which could in turn have an adverse effect on us. If we incur material environmental liabilities in the future, we may face significant remediation costs, and we may find it difficult to sell any affected properties.

We may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities related to acquired properties and properties that we may acquire in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Properties that we have acquired and properties that we may acquire in the future may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers. In general, the representations and warranties provided under the transaction agreements related to the purchase of properties that we acquire may not survive the completion of the transactions. Furthermore, indemnification under such agreements may be limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible, or an aggregate cap on losses. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties. In addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with these properties may exceed our expectations, and we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may materially and adversely affect us.
 
Our properties may contain or develop harmful mold or suffer from other air quality issues, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediation.
 
When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Indoor air quality issues can also stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contamination from indoor or outdoor sources, and other biological contaminants such as pollen, viruses, and bacteria. Indoor exposure to airborne toxins or irritants above certain levels can be alleged to cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold or other airborne contaminants from the affected property or increase indoor ventilation. In addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to liability from our tenants, employees of our tenants, or others if property damage or personal injury is alleged to have occurred.

 
We may incur significant costs complying with various federal, state and local laws, regulations, and covenants that are applicable to our properties.
 
Properties are subject to various covenants and federal, state, and local laws and regulatory requirements, including permitting and licensing requirements. Local regulations, including municipal or local ordinances, zoning restrictions, and restrictive covenants imposed by community developers may restrict our use of our properties and may require us to obtain approval from local officials or restrict our use of our properties and may require us to obtain approval from local officials of community standards organizations at any time with respect to our properties, including prior to developing or acquiring a property or when undertaking renovations of any of our existing properties. Among other things, these restrictions may relate to fire and safety, seismic, or hazardous material abatement requirements. There can be no assurance that existing laws and regulatory policies will not adversely affect us or the timing or cost of any future development, acquisitions, or renovations, or that additional regulations will not be adopted that increase such delays or result in additional costs. Our growth strategy may be affected by our ability to obtain permits, licenses, and zoning relief.
 
In addition, federal and state laws and regulations, including laws such as the ADA and the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988 (“FHAA”("FHAA"), impose further restrictions on our properties and operations. Under the ADA and the FHAA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Some of our properties may currently be in non-compliance with the ADA or the FHAA. If one or more of the properties in our portfolio is not in compliance with the ADA, the FHAA, or any other regulatory requirements, we may incur additional costs to bring the

property into compliance, incur governmental fines or the award of damages to private litigants, or be unable to refinance such properties. In addition, we do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether future requirements will require us to make significant unanticipated expenditures that will adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and cash flow.ability to service our debt obligations.
 
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
 
Daniel Hoffler and his affiliates own, directly or indirectly, a substantial beneficial interest in our company on a fully diluted basis and hashave the ability to exercise significant influence on our company and our Operating Partnership, including the approval of significant corporate transactions.
 
As of December 31, 2016,2019, Daniel Hoffler, our Executive Chairman, owned approximately 9%6% and, collectively, Messrs. Hoffler, Haddad, and Kirk owned approximately 15%11% of the combined outstanding shares of our common stock and OP Units of our Operating Partnership (which OP Units may be redeemable for shares of our common stock). Consequently, these individuals may be able to significantly influence the outcome of matters submitted for stockholder action, including the approval of significant corporate transactions, including business combinations, consolidations, and mergers. 
 
Conflicts of interest may exist or could arise in the future between the interests of our stockholders and the interests of holders of units in our Operating Partnership, which may impede business decisions that could benefit our stockholders.
 
Conflicts of interest may exist or could arise in the future as a result of the relationships between us and our affiliates, on the one hand, and our Operating Partnership or any partner thereof, on the other.thereof. Our directors and officers have duties to our company under Maryland law in connection with their management of our company. At the same time, we, as the general partner of our Operating Partnership, have fiduciary duties and obligations to our Operating Partnership and its limited partners under Virginia law and the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership in connection with the management of our Operating Partnership. Our fiduciary duties and obligations as the general partner of our Operating Partnership may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to our company. Messrs. Hoffler, Haddad, and Kirk own a significant interest in our Operating Partnership as limited partners and may have conflicts of interest in making decisions that affect both our stockholders and the limited partners of our Operating Partnership.
 
Under Virginia law, a general partner of a Virginia limited partnership has fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the partnership and its partners and must discharge its duties and exercise its rights as general partner under the partnership agreement or Virginia law consistently with the obligation of good faith and fair dealing. The partnership agreement provides that, in the event of a conflict between the interests of our Operating Partnership or any partner, on the one hand, and the separate interests of our company or our stockholders, on the other hand, we, in our capacity as the general partner of our Operating Partnership, are under no obligation not to give priority to the separate interests of our company or our stockholders, and that any action or failure to act on our part or on the part of our directors that gives priority to the separate interests of our company or our stockholders that does not result in a violation of the contractcontractual rights of the limited partners of the Operating

Partnership under its partnership agreement does not violate the duty of loyalty that we, in our capacity as the general partner of our Operating Partnership, owe to the Operating Partnership and its partners.
 
Additionally, the partnership agreement provides that we will not be liable to the Operating Partnership or any partner for monetary damages for losses sustained, liabilities incurred, or benefits not derived by the Operating Partnership or any limited partner, except for liability for our intentional harm or gross negligence. Our Operating Partnership must indemnify us, our directors and officers, and our designees from and against any and all claims that relate to the operations of our Operating Partnership, unless: (i) an act or omission of the person was material to the matter giving rise to the action and either was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (ii) the person actually received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of the partnership agreement, or (iii) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the indemnified person had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. Our Operating Partnership must also pay or reimburse the reasonable expenses of any such person upon its receipt of a written affirmation of the person’s good faith belief that the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification has been met and a written undertaking to repay any amounts paid or advanced if it is ultimately determined that the person did not meet the standard of conduct for indemnification. Our Operating Partnership will not indemnify or advance funds to any person with respect to any action initiated by the person seeking indemnification without our approval (except for any proceeding brought to enforce such person’s right to indemnification under the partnership agreement) or if the person is found to be liable to our Operating Partnership on any portion of any claim in the action.

We may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities related to acquired properties and properties that we may acquire in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Properties that we have acquired, and properties that we may acquire in the future, may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers. In general, the representations and warranties provided under the transaction agreements related to the purchase of properties that we acquire may not survive the completion of the transactions. Furthermore, indemnification under such agreements may be limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible or an aggregate cap on losses. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties. In addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with these properties may exceed our expectations, and we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which may materially and adversely affect us.

Our charter contains certain provisions restricting the ownership and transfer of our stock that may delay, defer, or prevent a change of control transaction that might involve a premium price for our common stock or that our stockholders otherwise believe to be in their best interests.
 
Our charter contains certain ownership limits with respect to our stock. Our charter, among other restrictions, prohibits the beneficial or constructive ownership by any person of more than 9.8% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock, excluding any shares that are not treated as outstanding for federal income tax purposes. Our board of directors, in its sole and absolute discretion, may exempt a person, prospectively or retroactively, from this ownership limit if certain conditions are satisfied. This ownership limit as well as other restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock in our charter may: 


discourage a tender offer or other transactions or a change in management or of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or that our stockholders otherwise believe to be in their best interests; and


result in the transfer of shares acquired in excess of the restrictions to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and, as a result, the forfeiture by the acquirer of certain of the benefits of owning the additional shares.
 
We could increase the number of authorized shares of stock, classify and reclassify unissued stock, and issue stock without stockholder approval.
 
Our board of directors, without stockholder approval, has the power under our charter to amend our charter to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we are authorized to issue. In addition, under our charter, our board of directors, without stockholder approval, has the power to authorize us to issue authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock and to classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock into one or more classes or series of stock and set the preference, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, or

terms or conditions of redemption for such newly classified or reclassified shares. As a result, we may issue series or classes of common stock or preferred stock with preferences, dividends, powers, and rights, voting or otherwise, that are senior to, or otherwise conflict with, the rights of holders of our common stock. Although our board of directors has no such intention at the present time, it could establish a class or series of preferred stock that could, depending on the terms of such series, delay, defer, or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or that our stockholders otherwise believe to be in their best interests.


Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes of control, which may discourage third parties from conducting a tender offer or seeking other change of control transactions that could involve a premium price for our common stock or that our stockholders otherwise believe to be in their best interests.
 
Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”"MGCL"), may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of such shares, including: 


“"business combination”combination" provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested stockholder”"interested stockholder" (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting shares or an affiliate or associate of ours who was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding stock at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question) or an affiliate thereof for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter imposesimpose certain fair price and supermajority stockholder voting requirements on these combinations; and


“"control share”share" provisions that provide that holders of “control shares”"control shares" of our company (defined as shares of stock that, when aggregated with other shares of stock controlled by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control"control share acquisition”acquisition" (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of issued and outstanding “control shares”"control shares") have no voting rights with respect to their control shares, except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.
 

By resolution of our board of directors, we have opted out of the business combination provisions of the MGCL and provided that any business combination between us and any other person is exempt from the business combination provisions of the MGCL, provided that the business combination is first approved by our board of directors (including a majority of directors who are not affiliates or associates of such persons). In addition, pursuant to a provision in our bylaws, we have opted out of the control share provisions of the MGCL. However, our board of directors may by resolution elect to opt in to the business combination provisions of the MGCL and we may, by amendment to our bylaws, opt in to the control share provisions of the MGCL in the future.
 
Certain provisions of the MGCL permit our board of directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or bylaws, to implement certain corporate governance provisions, some of which (for example, a classified board) are not currently applicable to us. If implemented, these provisions may have the effect of limiting or precluding a third party from making an unsolicited acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of us under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of shares of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then current market price. Our charter contains a provision whereby we elect, at such time as we become eligible to do so, to be subject to the provisions of Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL relating to the filling of vacancies on our board of directors.
 
Certain provisions in the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership may delay, make more difficult, or prevent unsolicited acquisitions of us.
 
Provisions in the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership may delay, or make more difficult, or prevent unsolicited acquisitions of us or changes of our control. These provisions could discourage third parties from making proposals involving an unsolicited acquisition of us or change of our control, although some of our stockholders might consider such proposals, if made, desirable. These provisions include, among others: 


redemption rights;



a requirement that we may not be removed as the general partner of our Operating Partnership without our consent;


transfer restrictions on OP Units;


our ability, as general partner, in some cases, to amend the partnership agreement and to cause the Operating Partnership to issue units with terms that could delay, defer, or prevent a merger or other change of control of us or our Operating Partnership without the consent of the limited partners; and


the right of the limited partners to consent to direct or indirect transfers of the general partnership interest, including as a result of a merger or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, in the event that such transfer requires approval by our common stockholders.
 
The limited partners in our Operating Partnership (other than us) owned approximately 31.9%27.4% of the outstanding OP Units of our Operating Partnership as of December 31, 2016.  
Our tax protection agreements could limit our ability to sell or otherwise dispose of certain properties.
In connection with the formation transactions related to our initial public offering, our Operating Partnership entered into tax protection agreements that provide that if we dispose of any interest in the certain protected properties in a taxable transaction prior to the seventh (or, in a limited number of cases, the tenth) anniversary of the completion of the formation transactions, subject to certain exceptions, we will indemnify certain contributors, including Messrs. Hoffler, Haddad, Kirk and Apperson and their respective affiliates and certain of our other officers, for their tax liabilities attributable to the built-in gain that existed with respect to such property interests as of the time of our initial public offering, and the tax liabilities incurred as a result of such tax protection payment. In addition, in connection with certain acquisitions completed since our initial public offering, we entered into tax protection agreements that require us to indemnify the contributors for their tax liabilities in the event that we dispose of the properties subject to the tax protection agreements, and may enter into similar agreements in connection with future property acquisitions. Therefore, although it may be in our stockholders’ best interests that we sell one of these properties, it may be economically prohibitive or unattractive for us to do so because of these obligations. Moreover, as a result of these potential tax liabilities, Messrs. Hoffler, Haddad, Kirk and Apperson and certain of our other officers may have a conflict of interest with respect to our determination as to certain of our properties. 
Our tax protection agreements may require our Operating Partnership to maintain certain debt levels that otherwise would not be required to operate our business.
Under our tax protection agreements, our Operating Partnership has agreed to provide certain contributors of properties we have acquired, including Messrs. Hoffler, Haddad, Kirk, Nero and Apperson and their respective affiliates and certain of our other officers, the opportunity to guarantee debt or enter into deficit restoration obligations upon a future repayment, retirement, refinancing or other reduction (other than scheduled amortization) of currently outstanding debt. If we fail to make such opportunities available, we will be required to deliver to each such contributor a cash payment intended to approximate the contributor’s tax liability resulting from our failure to make such opportunities available to that contributor and the tax liabilities incurred as a result of such tax protection payment. We agreed to these provisions in order to assist our contributors in deferring the recognition of taxable gain as a result of the contribution of certain properties to us. These obligations may require us to maintain more or different indebtedness than we would otherwise require for our business.
We may pursue less vigorous enforcement of terms of certain agreements with members of our senior management and our affiliates because of our dependence on them and conflicts of interest.
Each of Messrs. Hoffler, Haddad and Kirk, our Executive Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board, respectively, were parties to or had interests in contribution agreements with us pursuant to which we acquired interests in our properties and assets. In addition, we have entered into option agreements with certain of our officers and directors, or entities they control, with respect to certain parcels of developable land. We may choose not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under these agreements because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationships with members of our board of directors and our management, with possible negative impact on stockholders.


Our board of directors may change our strategies, policies and procedures without stockholder approval and we may become more highly leveraged, which may increase our risk of default under our debt obligations.
Our investment, financing, leverage and distribution policies, and our policies with respect to all other activities, including growth, capitalization and operations, will be determined exclusively by our board of directors, and may be amended or revised at any time by our board of directors without notice to or a vote of our stockholders. This could result in us conducting operational matters, making investments or pursuing different business or growth strategies than those contemplated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Further, our charter and bylaws do not limit the amount or percentage of indebtedness, funded or otherwise, that we may incur. Our board of directors may alter or eliminate our current policy on borrowing at any time without stockholder approval. If this policy changed, we could become more highly leveraged which could result in an increase in our debt service. Higher leverage also increases the risk of default on our obligations. In addition, a change in our investment policies, including the manner in which we allocate our resources across our portfolio or the types of assets in which we seek to invest, may increase our exposure to interest rate risk, real estate market fluctuations and liquidity risk. Changes to our policies with regards to the foregoing could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.2019.  
 
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited.
 
Under Maryland law, generally, a director will not be liable if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our charter limits the liability of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders for money damages, except for liability resulting from:


actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or


active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action adjudicated.
 
Our charter authorizes us to indemnify our directors and officers for actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Our bylaws require us to indemnify each director and officer, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service to us. In addition, we may be obligated to advance the defense costs incurred by our

directors and officers. We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors whereby we agreed to indemnify our directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by Maryland law against all expenses and liabilities incurred in their capacity as an officer or director, subject to limited exceptions. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist absent the current provisions in our charter and bylaws and the indemnification agreements or that might exist with other companies.
 
We are a holding company with no direct operations and, as such, we will rely on funds received from our Operating Partnership to pay liabilities, and the interests of our stockholders will be structurally subordinated to all liabilities and obligations of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries.
 
We are a holding company and conduct substantially all of our operations through our Operating Partnership. We do not have, apart from an interest in our Operating Partnership, any independent operations. As a result, we rely on cash distributions from our Operating Partnership to pay any dividends we might declare on shares of our common stock and preferred stock. We also rely on distributions from our Operating Partnership to meet any of our obligations, including any tax liability on taxable income allocated to us from our Operating Partnership. In addition, because we are a holding company, your claims as a stockholder will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations (whether or not for borrowed money) of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation, or reorganization, our assets and those of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries will be available to satisfy the claims of our stockholders only after all of our and our Operating Partnership’s and its subsidiaries’ liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.



Our Operating Partnership may issue additional OP Units to third parties without the consent of our stockholders, which would reduce our ownership percentage in our Operating Partnership and could have a dilutive effect on the amount of distributions made to us by our Operating Partnership and, therefore, the amount of distributions we can make to our stockholders.
 
As of December 31, 2016,2019, we owned 68.1%72.6% of the outstanding OP Units in our Operating Partnership. We regularly have issued OP Units to third parties as consideration for acquisitions, and in the future we may continue to do so in the future. Any such future issuances would reduce our ownership percentage in our Operating Partnership and could affect the amount of distributions made to us by our Operating Partnership and, therefore, the amount of distributions we can make to our stockholders. Because stockholders do not directly own OP Units, you do not have any voting rights with respect to any such issuances or other partnership level activities of our Operating Partnership.  
 
Risks Related to Our Status as a REIT
 
Failure to qualify as a REIT, or failure to remain qualified as a REIT, would cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, which would substantially reduce funds available for distribution to our stockholders.
 
We have elected to be taxed and to operate in a manner that will allow us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2013. We have not requested and do not plan to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”"IRS") that we qualify as a REIT. Therefore, we cannot be assured that we will qualify as a REIT, or that we will remain qualified as such in the future. If we fail to qualify as a REIT or otherwise lose our REIT status in any taxable year, we will face serious tax consequences that would substantially reduce the funds available for distribution to our stockholders for each of the years involved because: 


we would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates;


we could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes; and


unless we are entitled to relief under certain U.S. federal income tax laws, we could not re-elect REIT status until the fifth calendar year after the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT.
 
In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will no longer be required to make distributions. As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, and it would adversely affect the value of our common stock.
 

Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flows.
 
Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain federal, state, and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property, and transfer taxes. In addition, our TRS will be subject to regular corporate federal, state, and local taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Failure to make required distributions would subject us to U.S. federal corporate income tax.
We intend to continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a REIT, we generally are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain, each year to our stockholders. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under the Code.


Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
 
To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders, and

the ownership of our capital stock. In order to meet these tests, we may be required to forego investments we might otherwise make. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our performance.
 
In particular, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities, and qualified real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, securities of TRSs, and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities, securities of TRSs, and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 25% (20% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017)20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by the securities of one or more TRSs. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders. 
 
The prohibited transactions tax may limit our ability to dispose of our properties.
 
A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. We may be subject to the prohibited transaction tax equal to 100% of the net gain upon a disposition of real property. Although a safe harbor to the characterization of the sale of real property by a REIT as a prohibited transaction is available, we cannot assure you that we can comply with the safe harbor or that we will avoid owning property that may be characterized as held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Consequently, we may choose not to engage in certain sales of our properties or may conduct such sales through our TRS, which would be subject to federal and state income taxation.
We may pay taxable dividends in shares of our common stock and cash, in which case stockholders may sell shares of our common stock to pay tax on such dividends, placing downward pressure on the market price of our common stock.
We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in cash and common stock at the election of each stockholder. The IRS has issued private letter rulings to other REITs treating certain distributions that are paid partly in cash and partly in stock as taxable dividends that would satisfy the REIT annual distribution requirement and qualify for the dividends paid deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Those rulings may be relied upon only by taxpayers to whom they were issued, but we could request a similar ruling from the IRS. In addition, the IRS previously issued a revenue procedure authorizing publicly traded REITs to make elective cash/stock dividends, but that revenue procedure does not apply to our 2013 and future taxable years. Accordingly, it is unclear whether and to what extent we will be able to make taxable dividends payable in cash and common stock.
If we made a taxable dividend payable in cash and common stock, taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, stockholders may be required to pay income tax with respect to such dividends in excess of the cash dividends received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the common stock that it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our common stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to certain non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in common stock. If we made a taxable dividend payable in cash and our common stock and a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our common stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. We do not currently intend to pay taxable dividends of our common stock and cash, although we may choose to do so in the future.


The ability of our board of directors to revoke our REIT qualification without stockholder approval may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders.
 
Our charter provides that our board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT. If we cease to qualify as a REIT, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and would no longer be required to distribute most of our taxable income to our stockholders, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our stockholders.
 

Our ownership of our TRS will be subject to limitations and our transactions with our TRS will cause us to be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain income or deductions if those transactions are not conducted on arm’s-length terms.
 
Overall, no more than 25% (20% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017)20% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRS. In addition, the Code limits the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The Code also imposes a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. Furthermore, we will monitor the value of our respective investments in our TRS for the purpose of ensuring compliance with TRS ownership limitations and will structure our transactions with our TRS on terms that we believe are arm’s length to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to comply with the 25% (20% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017)20% REIT subsidiaries limitation or to avoid application of the 100% excise tax. 
 

You may be restricted from acquiring or transferring certain amounts of our common stock.
 
The restrictions on ownership and transfer in our charter may inhibit market activity in our capital stock and restrict our business combination opportunities.
 
In order to qualify as a REIT for each taxable year after 2013, five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code, may not own, beneficially or constructively, more than 50% in value of our issued and outstanding stock at any time during the last half of a taxable year. Attribution rules in the Code determine if any individual or entity beneficially or constructively owns our capital stock under this requirement. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our capital stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year for each taxable year after 2013. To help insureensure that we meet these tests, our charter restricts the acquisition and ownership of shares of our capital stock.
 
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our board of directors, our charter prohibits any person from beneficially or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital or preferred stock. Our board of directors may not grant an exemption from this restriction to any proposed transferee whose ownership in excess of 9.8% of the value of our outstanding shares would result in our failing to qualify as a REIT. This restriction, as well as other restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply, however, if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT.
 
Dividends payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.
 
The maximum tax rate applicable to “qualified"qualified dividend income”income" payable to U.S. stockholders that are taxed at individual rates is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates on qualified dividend income. The more favorableInstead, our ordinary dividends generally are taxed at the higher tax rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who taxed atordinary income, the current maximum rate of which is 37%. However, for taxable years prior to 2026, individual ratesstockholders are generally allowed to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the valuededuct 20% of the sharesaggregate amount of REITs, including our common stock.ordinary dividends distributed by us, subject to certain limitations, which would reduce the maximum marginal effective tax rate for individuals on the receipt of such ordinary dividends to 29.6%.
 
Changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws, including the enactment of certain proposed tax reform measures, could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

NumerousThe legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act significantly changed the U.S. federal income taxation of U.S. businesses and their owners, including REITs and their stockholders. The full impact of the act on us and our shareholders is uncertain and may not become evident for some period of time. For example, the act contained provisions that may reduce the relative competitive advantage of operating as a REIT, including the lowering of income tax rates on individuals and corporations, which eases the burden of double taxation on corporate dividends and potentially causes the single level of taxation on REIT distributions to become relatively less attractive. The act also contains provisions allowing the expensing of capital expenditures, which could result in the bunching of taxable income and required distributions for REITs, and provisions extending the depreciable lives of certain real estate assets and further limiting the deductibility of interest expense, which could negatively impact the real estate market. In addition, although the Tax Act was recently passed, there can be no assurance that future changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws are proposed regularly.  Moreover, legislative andor regulatory changes maywill not be more likely in the 115th Congress because the Presidencyproposed or enacted that could impact our business and such Congress will be controlled by the same political party and significant reform of the Code has been described publicly as a legislative priority.  Additionally, thefinancial results. The REIT rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRSInternal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department, which may result in revisions to regulations and interpretations in addition to statutory changes. If enacted, certain of such changes could have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.    For example, certain proposals set forth in Trump administration and House Republican tax plans could reduce the relative competitive advantage of operating as a REIT unless accompanied by responsive changes to the REIT rules.  These proposals include: the lowering of income tax rates on individuals and corporations, which could ease the burden of double taxation on corporate dividends and make the single level of taxation on REIT distributions relatively less attractive; allowing the expensing of capital expenditures, which could have a similar impact and also could result in the bunching of taxable income and required distributions for REITs; and further limiting or eliminating the deductibility of interest expense, which could disrupt the real estate market and could increase the amount of REIT taxable income that must be distributed as dividends to shareholders. 


We cannot predict whether, when, or to what extent the Tax Act and any new U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations, or rulings will be issued, nor is the long-term impact of proposed tax reforms on the real estate investment industry or REITs clear.REITs. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the effect of the Tax Act and potential future changes to the U.S. federal tax laws on an investment in our shares.

The period during which a REIT is subject to tax in respect of built-in gains recognized on property acquired form a C corporation is currently uncertain. 

On June 7, 2016, the U.S. Treasury Department issued temporary Regulations which temporarily extended the period during which a REIT is subject to tax in respect of built-in gains recognized on property acquired from a C corporation from five years to ten years.  This extension only applied to assets with built-in gains acquired on or after August 8, 2016 and was set to expire on June 7, 2019.  On January 18, 2017, the U.S. Treasury Department issued final Regulations to shorten the ten-year period back to a five-year period for assets with built-in gains acquired on or after February 17, 2017, and to permit taxpayers to apply the five-year period for assets with built-in gains acquired on or after August 8, 2016 and on or before February 17, 2017.  Pursuant to these final Regulations, if we acquire any asset from a C corporation, or a corporation that generally is subject to full corporate level tax, in a merger or other transaction in which we acquire a basis in the asset that is determined by reference either to the C corporation’s basis in the asset or to another asset, we will pay tax at the highest U.S. federal corporate income tax rate applicable if we recognize gain on the sale or disposition of the asset during the five-year period after we acquire the asset.  However, on January 20, 2017, White House Chief of Staff Reince Preibus issued a Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies (the “Regulatory Freeze Memorandum”), effective January 18, 2017, ordering agencies to temporarily postpone for 60 days the effective date of certain regulations; the effect of the Regulatory Freeze Memorandum, if any, on the final Regulations described above remains unclear.   


If our Operating Partnership failed to qualify as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, we would cease to qualify as a REIT and suffer other adverse consequences.
 
We believe that our Operating Partnership will be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, our Operating Partnership will not be subject to federal income tax on its income. Instead, each of its partners, including us, will be allocated, and may be required to pay tax with respect to, its share of our Operating Partnership’s income. We cannot assure you, however, that the IRS will not challenge the status of our Operating Partnership or any other subsidiary

partnership in which we own an interest as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. If the IRS were successful in treating our Operating Partnership or any such other subsidiary partnership as an entity taxable as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, we would fail to meet the gross income tests and certain of the asset tests applicable to REITs and, accordingly, we would likely cease to qualify as a REIT. Also, the failure of our Operating Partnership or any subsidiary partnerships to qualify as a partnership could cause it to become subject to federal and state corporate income tax, which would reduce significantly the amount of cash available for debt service and for distribution to its partners, including us.
 
To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions, and the unavailability of such capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all, may cause us to curtail our investment activities or dispose of assets at inopportune times or on unfavorable terms, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and cash flow.ability to service our debt obligations.
 
To qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income each year, excluding net capital gains, and we will be subject to regular corporate income taxes to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income each year. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. In order to maintain our REIT status and avoid the payment of income and excise taxes, we may need to borrow funds to meet the REIT distribution requirements even if the then prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. These borrowing needs could result from, among other things, differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes, or the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required principal or amortization payments. These sources, however, may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends on a number of factors, including the market’s perception of our growth potential, our current debt levels, the market price of our common stock, and our current and potential future earnings. We cannot assure you that we will have access to such capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all, which may cause us to curtail our investment activities or dispose of assets at inopportune times or on unfavorable terms, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, and cash flows.ability to service our debt obligations.
 

Risks Related to Our CommonCapital Stock
 
We may be unable to make distributions at expected levels, which could result in a decrease in the market price of our common stock.stock and Series A Preferred Stock.
 
We intend to continue to pay regular quarterly distributions to our stockholders. All distributions will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will be based upon, among other factors, our historical and projected results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity, maintenance of our REIT qualification and other tax considerations, capital expenditure and other expense obligations, debt covenants, contractual prohibitions or other limitations, and applicable law, and such other matters as our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. If sufficient cash is not available for distribution from our operations, we may have to fund distributions from working capital, borrow to provide funds for such distributions, or reduce the amount of such distributions. To the extent we borrow to fund distributions, our future interest costs would increase, thereby reducing our earnings and cash available for distribution from what they otherwise would have been. If cash available for distribution generated by our assets is less than our current estimate, or if such cash available for distribution decreases in future periods from expected levels, our inability to make the expected distributions could result in a decrease in the market price of our common stock.stock and Series A Preferred Stock.
 
Our ability to make distributions may also be limited by our credit facility. Under the terms of the credit facility, our ability to make distributions during any twelve-month period is limited to the greater of (1) 95% of our adjusted funds from operations (as defined in the credit agreement) or (2) the aggregate amount of Restricted Payments (as defined in the credit agreement) required for us to (a) maintain our REIT status and (b) avoid the payment of federal or state income or excise tax. In addition, if a default or events of default exist or would result from a distribution, we are precluded from making certain distributions other than those required to allow us to maintain our status as a REIT.

As a result of the foregoing, we may not be able to make distributions in the future, and our inability to make distributions, or to make distributions at expected levels, could result in a decrease in the market price of our common stock.stock and Series A Preferred Stock.
 

The market price and trading volume of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock may be volatile and could decline substantially in the future.
 
The market price of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock may be volatile in the future. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. We cannot assure stockholders that the market price of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future, including as a result of factors unrelated to our operating performance or prospects in 20172020 compared to 2016.2019. In particular, the market price of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including, among others, the following: 


actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or dividends;


changes in our FFO, Normalized FFO, or earnings estimates;


publication of research reports about us or the real estate industry;


increases in market interest rates that lead purchasers of our shares to demand a higher yield;


changes in market valuations of similar companies;


adverse market reaction to any additional debt we incur in the future;


additions or departures of key management personnel;


actions by institutional stockholders;


speculation in the press or investment community;


the realization of any of the other risk factors presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K;


the extent of investor interest in our securities;


the general reputation of REITs and the attractiveness of our equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate-based companies;


changes in the federal government, particularly with respect to the new political administration;government;


our underlying asset value;


investor confidence in the stock and bond markets generally;


further changes in tax laws;


future equity issuances;


failure to meet earnings estimates;


failure to meet and maintain REIT qualifications;


changes in our credit ratings; and


general market and economic conditions.conditions;

our issuance of debt securities or additional preferred equity securities; and

our financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the price of their common stock. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s

attention and resources, which could have a material and adverse effect on us, including our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, cash available for distribution, ability to service our debt obligations, and the per share trading price of our common stock.stock and Series A Preferred Stock.
 
Increases in market interest rates may have an adverse effect on the trading prices of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock as prospective purchasers of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock may expect a higher dividend yield and as an increased cost of borrowing may decrease our funds available for distribution.

One of the factors that will influence the trading prices of our common stock and Series A Preferred Stock will be the dividend yield on the common stock (as a percentage of the price of our common stock)stock or Series A Preferred Stock, as applicable) relative to market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates, which are currently at low levels relative to historical rates, may lead prospective purchasers of our common stock or Series A Preferred Stock to expect a higher dividend yield (with a resulting decline in the trading prices of our common stock)stock or Series A Preferred Stock, as applicable) and higher interest rates would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our common stock or Series A Preferred Stock to decrease.

Our Series A Preferred Stock is subordinate to our existing and future debt, and the interests of holders of our Series A Preferred Stock could be diluted by the issuance of additional shares of preferred stock and by other transactions.

Our Series A Preferred Stock ranks junior to all of our existing and future indebtedness, any classes and series of our capital stock expressly designated as ranking senior to our Series A Preferred Stock as to distribution rights and rights upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, and other non-equity claims on us and our assets available to satisfy claims against us, including claims in bankruptcy, liquidation, or similar proceedings. Subject to limitations prescribed by Maryland law and our charter, our Board of Directors is authorized to issue, from our authorized but unissued shares of capital stock, preferred stock in such classes or series as our Board of Directors may determine and to establish from time to time the number of shares of preferred stock to be included in any such class or series. The issuance of additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock or additional shares of capital stock ranking on parity with our Series A Preferred Stock would dilute the interests of the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock, and the issuance of shares of any class or series of our capital stock expressly designated as ranking senior to our Series A Preferred Stock as to distribution rights and rights upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or the incurrence of additional indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends on, redeem, or pay the liquidation preference on our Series A Preferred Stock. Other than the conversion right afforded to holders of our Series A Preferred Stock that may become exercisable in connection with a change of control (as defined in the articles supplementary designating the terms of our Series A Preferred Stock), none of the provisions relating to our Series A Preferred Stock contain any terms relating to or limiting our indebtedness or affording the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock protection in the event of a highly leveraged or other transaction, including a merger or the sale, lease, or conveyance of all or substantially all our assets, that might adversely affect the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock, so long as the rights of the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock are not materially and adversely affected.

Holders of our Series A Preferred Stock have extremely limited voting rights.

Our common stock is the only class of our securities that carry full voting rights. Voting rights for holders of our Series A Preferred Stock exist primarily with respect to the ability to elect, together with holders of our capital stock ranking on parity with our Series A Preferred Stock and having similar voting rights, two additional directors to our Board of Directors in the event that six quarterly dividends (whether or not consecutive) payable on our Series A Preferred Stock are in arrears, and with respect to voting on amendments to our charter or articles supplementary relating to our Series A Preferred Stock that materially and adversely affect the rights of the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock or create additional classes or series of our capital stock expressly designated as ranking senior to our Series A Preferred Stock as to distribution rights and rights upon our liquidation, dissolution, or winding up. Other than as described above and as set forth in more detail in the articles supplementary designating the terms of our Series A Preferred Stock, holders of our Series A Preferred Stock will not have any voting rights.

Holders of our Series A Preferred Stock may not be permitted to exercise conversion rights upon a change of control. If exercisable, the change of control conversion feature of our Series A Preferred Stock may not adequately compensate preferred stockholders, and the change of control conversion and redemption features of our Series A Preferred Stock may make it more difficult for a party to take over our company or discourage a party from taking over our company

Upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the articles supplementary designating the terms of our Series A Preferred Stock), holders of our Series A Preferred Stock will have the right to convert some or all of their Series A Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock (or equivalent value of alternative consideration). Notwithstanding that we

generally may not redeem our Series A Preferred Stock prior to June 18, 2024, we have a special optional redemption right to redeem our Series A Preferred Stock in the event of a change of control, and holders of our Series A Preferred Stock will not have the right to convert any shares of our Series A Preferred Stock that we have elected to redeem prior to the change of control conversion date. Upon such a conversion, the holders will be limited to a maximum number of shares of our common stock available for future issuance orequal to the 2.97796 (i.e. the "Share Cap"), subject to certain adjustments, multiplied by the number of our Series A Preferred Stock converted. If the Common Stock Price (as defined in the articles supplementary designating the terms of our Series A Preferred Stock) is less than $8.395 (which is approximately 50% of the per-share closing sale could materially adversely affect the per share trading price of our common stock.
Asstock on June 10, 2019), subject to adjustment, each holder will receive a maximum of February 28, 2017, there were 37,588,2782.97796 shares of our common stock outstanding.per share of our Series A Preferred Stock, which may result in a holder receiving value that is less than the liquidation preference of our Series A Preferred Stock. In addition, as of February 28, 2017, there were 17,858,610 OP Units in our Operating Partnership outstanding, of which 16,583,610 OP Units are currently redeemable at the option of the holders, 1,000,000 OP Units will become redeemable by the holders on July 10, 2017 and 275,000 OP Units will become redeemable by the holders on January 10, 2018, in each case, for cash, or at our option, for sharesthose features of our common stock, onSeries A Preferred Stock may have the effect of inhibiting a one-for-one basis. We havethird party from making an effective resale shelf registration statement pursuant to which we may issue freely tradeable sharesacquisition proposal for our company or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of our common stock upon redemption of such OP Units. Accordingly, a substantial number of shares of our common stockcompany under circumstances that otherwise could be issued inprovide the future pursuant to such resale shelf registration statement. In addition, we have an effective shelf registration statement covering the possible resale, from time to time, of up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock that were issued in connection with our acquisition of a stabilized retail asset on October 13, 2016. The sale of such shares, or the perception that such sale may occur, could materially and adversely affect the per share trading price of our common stock. In addition, as of the date hereof, 218,050 sharesholders of our common stock and other equity-based awards were available for issuanceSeries A Preferred Stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-current market price or that stockholders may otherwise believe is in the future under our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.their best interests.
We cannot predict whether future issuances or sales of shares of our common stock or the availability of shares for resale in the open market will decrease the per share trading price per share of our common stock. The per share trading price of our common stock may decline significantly when we register the shares of our common stock issuable upon redemption of outstanding OP Units.

The issuance of substantial numbers of shares of equity securities, including OP Units, or the perception that such issuances might occur could materially adversely affect us, including the per share trading price of shares of our common stock.
The redemption of OP Units for common stock, the vesting of any restricted stock granted to certain directors, executive officers and other employees under our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, the issuance of our common stock or OP Units in connection with future property, portfolio or business acquisitions and other issuances of our common stock could have an adverse effect on the per share trading price of our common stock, and the existence of units, options or shares of our common stock issuable under our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan or upon redemption of OP Units may adversely affect the terms upon which we may be able to obtain additional capital through the sale of equity securities. In addition, future issuances of shares of our common stock or OP Units may be dilutive to existing stockholders.

Future offerings of debt, which would be senior to our common stock upon liquidation, and preferred equity securities, which may be senior to our common stock for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may materially adversely affect us, including the per share trading price of our common stock.
In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of debt or equity securities (or causing our Operating Partnership to issue debt securities), including medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes and classes or series of preferred stock. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will be entitled to receive our available assets prior to distribution to the holders of our common stock. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our common stock and may result in dilution to owners of our common stock. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution. Our preferred stock, if issued, could have a preference on liquidating distributions or a preference on dividend payments that could limit our ability pay dividends to the holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk that our future offerings could reduce the per share trading price of our common stock and dilute their interest in us.


Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.  
 
None.


Item 2.Properties.  
 
The information set forth under the captions “Our Properties”"Our Properties" and “Development Pipeline”"Development Pipeline" in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference herein.


Item 3. Legal Proceedings.  
 
The nature of our business exposes our properties, us and the Operating Partnership to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of business. Other than routine litigation arising out of the ordinary course of business, we are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us.
 
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.  
 
Not Applicable.

PART II  
 
Item 5.Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
 
Market Information
 
Our common stock trades on the NYSENew York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AHH.” Below is a summary of the high and low prices of our common stock for each quarterly period in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the cash distributions per share declared by us with respect to each period.  "AHH."
 
      Distributions
2016 High Low Declared
January 1, 2016—March 31, 2016 $11.50
 $9.76
 $0.18
April 1, 2016—June 30, 2016 13.84
 11.15
 0.18
July 1, 2016—September 30, 2016 15.50
 12.67
 0.18
October 1, 2016—December 31, 2016 14.98
 12.52
 0.18

      Distributions
2015 High Low Declared
January 1, 2015—March 31, 2015 $11.12
 $9.44
 $0.17
April 1, 2015—June 30, 2015 10.83
 9.99
 0.17
July 1, 2015—September 30, 2015 10.63
 9.50
 0.17
October 1, 2015—December 31, 2015 11.60
 9.62
 0.17
On December 31, 2016 and February 28, 2017, the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE was $14.57 and $13.95, respectively. 

Stock Performance Graph
 
The following graph sets forth the cumulative total stockholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) to our stockholders during the period May 8, 2013, the date our common stock began trading on the NYSE,December 31, 2014 through December 31, 2016,2019, as well as the corresponding returns on an overall stock market index (Russell 2000 Index)2000) and a peer group index (MSCI US REIT Index). The stock performance graph assumes that $100 was invested on May 8, 2013.December 31, 2014. Historical total stockholder return is not necessarily indicative of future results. The information in this paragraph and the following graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material”"soliciting material" or to be “filed”"filed" with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, other than as provided in Item 201 of Regulation S-K, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate it by reference into a filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

chart-cd2ab5ad4a305a238f7.jpg
 Period Ending
Index12/31/201412/31/201512/31/201612/31/201712/31/201812/31/2019
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.100.00117.91173.27194.97186.74256.04
MSCI US REIT100.00102.52111.34116.98111.64140.48
Russell 2000100.0095.59115.95132.94118.30148.49


Distribution Information
 
Since our initial quarter as a publicly-traded REIT, we have made regular quarterly distributions to our stockholders. We intend to continue to declare quarterly distributions. However, we cannot provide any assurance as to the amount or timing of future distributions. For a description of restrictions on our ability to make distributions, see “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facility,” and Note 8, “Indebtedness” to our accompanying consolidated financial statements.


Any future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors, and their form, timing, and amount, if any, will depend upon a number of factors, including our actual and projected financial condition, liquidity, EBITDA, FFO, andNormalized FFO, results of operations, the revenue we actually receive from our properties, our operating expenses, our debt service requirements, our capital expenditures, prohibitions and other limitations under our financing arrangements, as described above, our REIT taxable income, the annual REIT distribution requirements, applicable law, and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant. To the extent that our cash available for distribution is less than 90% of our REIT taxable income, we may consider various means to cover any such shortfall, including borrowing under our credit facility or other loans, selling certain of our assets, or using a portion of the net proceeds we receive from offerings of equity, equity-related, or debt securities, or declaring taxable share dividends.
 
To the extent that we make distributions in excess of our earnings and profits, as computed for federal income tax purposes, these distributions will represent a return of capital, rather than a dividend, for federal income tax purposes.

Distributions that are treated as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes will reduce the stockholder’s basis in its shares (but not below zero) and therefore can result in the stockholder having a higher gain upon a subsequent sale of such shares. Return of capital distributions in excess of a stockholder’s basis generally will be treated as gain from the sale of such shares for federal income tax purposes.
 
Stockholder Information
 
As of February 28, 2017,20, 2020, there were approximately 103114 holders of record of our common stock. However, because many shares of our common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we believe there are substantially more beneficial holders of our common stock than record holders. As of February 28, 2017,20, 2020, there were 89104 holders (other than our company) of our OP units. Our OP units are redeemable for cash or, at our election, for shares of our common stock.  
 
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
 
None.
Issuer PurchasesSubject to the satisfaction of Equity Securities
certain conditions, holders of OP Units in the Operating Partnership may tender their units for redemption by the Operating Partnership in exchange for cash equal to the market price of shares of the Company’s common stock at the time of redemption or, at the Company’s option and sole discretion, for shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis. During the three months ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company elected to satisfy certain redemption requests by issuing a total of our employees surrendered4,896 shares of common stock ownedin reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by them to satisfy their minimum statutory federal and state tax obligations associated withSection 4(a)(2) of the vestingSecurities Act of restricted shares1933, as amended.

Issuer Purchases of common stock issued under our 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. The following table summarizes all of these repurchases during the three months ended December 31, 2016.  Securities

None.
      Total Number of  
      Shares Purchased Maximum Number of
      as Part of Publicly Shares that May Yet be
  Total Number of Average Price Announced Plans Purchased Under the
Period 
Shares Purchased(1)
 
Paid for Shares(1)
 or Programs Plans or Programs
October 1, 2016 through October 31, 2016 —
 $—
 N/A N/A
November 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016 98
 13.10
 N/A N/A
December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 —
 —
 N/A N/A
Total 98
      

(1)The number of shares purchased represents shares of common stock surrendered by certain of our employees to satisfy their statutory minimum federal and state tax obligations associated with the vesting of restricted shares of common stock issued under the 2013 Plan. With respect to these shares, the price paid per share is based on the fair value at the time of surrender.


Item 6.Selected Financial Data.  
 
The following selected historical consolidated and combined financial information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s"Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations" and the historical consolidated and combined financial statements as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 and for the three years ended December 31, 20162019 and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We completed our initial public offering on May 13, 2013. Due to the timing of the initial public offering, we present herein certain consolidated and combined historical financial data for us and our predecessor. Our predecessor was not a legal entity, but rather a combination of certain real estate and construction entities. The historical combined financial data for our predecessor is not necessarily indicative of our results of operations, cash flows or financial position following the completion of the initial public offering.
The selected historical consolidated and combined financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 2015, 2014, 2013 and 20122015 has been derived from our audited historical financial statements. Due to the timing of the initial public offering, the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 reflect only the financial condition and

results of operations of our predecessor. The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 reflect the financial condition and results of operations of our predecessor together with our company. 
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31, 
2016 2015 2014 2013 20122019 2018 2017 2016 2015
($ in thousands, except per share data)($ in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Data:                                                
Rental revenues$99,355
 $81,172
 $64,746
 $57,520
 $54,436
$151,339
 $116,958
 $108,737
 $99,355
 $81,172
General contracting and real estate services revenues159,030
 171,268
 103,321
 82,516
 54,046
105,859
 76,359
 194,034
 159,030
 171,268
Rental expenses21,904
 19,204
 16,667
 14,025
 12,682
34,332
 27,222
 25,422
 21,904
 19,204
Real estate taxes9,629
 7,782
 5,743
 5,124
 4,865
14,961
 11,383
 10,528
 9,629
 7,782
General contracting and real estate services expenses153,375
 165,344
 98,754
 78,813
 50,103
101,538
 73,628
 186,590
 153,375
 165,344
Depreciation and amortization35,328
 23,153
 17,569
 14,898
 12,909
54,564
 39,913
 37,321
 35,328
 23,153
Interest expense(16,466) (13,333) (10,648) (12,303) (16,561)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(82) (512) —
 (2,387) —
Gain on real estate dispositions and acquisitions30,533
 18,394
 2,211
 9,460
 —
Income from continuing operations42,755
 31,183
 12,759
 14,453
 8,907
Results from discontinued operations—
 —
 —
 —
 (10)
Interest expense on indebtedness(30,776) (19,087) (17,439) (16,466) (13,333)
Gain on real estate dispositions4,699
 4,254
 8,087
 30,533
 18,394
Net income$42,755
 $31,183
 $12,759
 $14,453
 $8,897
32,258
 23,492
 29,925
 42,755
 31,183
Net income attributable to stockholders$28,074
 $19,642
 $7,691
 $7,336
  
Net income per share—basic and diluted$0.85
 $0.75
 $0.36
 $0.39
  
Cash dividends declared per share$0.72
 $0.68
 $0.64
 $0.40
  
Net income attributable to common stockholders21,598
 17,203
 21,047
 28,074
 19,642
Net income attributable to common stockholders per share (basic and diluted)$0.41
 $0.36
 $0.50
 $0.85
 $0.75
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.84
 $0.80
 $0.76
 $0.72
 $0.68
Balance Sheet Data:                  
Real estate investments, at cost$908,287
 $633,591
 $595,000
 $462,976
 $354,740
$1,606,324
 $1,176,586
 $994,437
 $908,287
 $633,591
Accumulated depreciation(139,553) (125,380) (116,099) (105,228) (92,454)(224,738) (188,775) (164,521) (139,553) (125,380)
Net real estate investments768,734
 508,211
 478,901
 357,748
 262,286
1,381,586
 987,811
 829,916
 768,734
 508,211
Real estate investments held for sale—
 40,232
 8,538
 —
 —
1,460
 929
 —
 —
 40,232
Cash and cash equivalents21,942
 26,989
 25,883
 18,882
 9,400
39,232
 21,254
 19,959
 21,942
 26,989
Notes receivable59,546
 7,825
 —
 —
 —
159,371
 138,683
 83,058
 59,546
 7,825
Construction assets39,543
 36,623
 19,704
 13,811
 11,696
36,610
 17,512
 24,178
 39,543
 36,623
Total assets$982,468
 $689,547
 588,022
 432,210
 329,862
1,804,897
 1,265,382
 1,043,123
 982,468
 689,547
Indebtedness, net522,180
 377,593
 356,345
 274,673
 333,130
950,537
 694,239
 517,272
 522,180
 377,593
Construction liabilities61,297
 54,291
 43,452
 29,680
 21,605
58,688
 53,833
 51,036
 61,297
 54,291
Total liabilities633,490
 463,827
 426,116
 326,689
 371,203
1,149,450
 809,492
 622,840
 633,490
 463,827
Total equity348,978
 225,720
 161,906
 105,521
 (41,341)655,447
 455,890
 420,283
 348,978
 225,720
Other Data:                  
Funds from operations(1)
$47,980
 $35,942
 $28,117
 $19,806
 $21,886
Normalized funds from operations(2)
50,921
 38,659
 28,594
 22,812
 —
FFO attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders (1)
$79,986
 $64,339
 $59,651
 $47,980
 $35,942
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders (1)
85,088
 66,458
 59,332
 50,921
 38,659
Cash provided by operating activities59,770
 33,086
 31,362
 22,175
 22,326
67,729
 56,087
 51,236
 56,985
 33,266
Cash used for investing activities(226,461) (56,381) (105,306) (47,947) (4,702)(295,063) (240,563) (95,355) (223,031) (57,961)
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities161,644
 24,401
 80,945
 35,254
 (21,673)
Cash provided by financing activities246,862
 185,611
 41,842
 161,426
 24,401

(1)We calculate funds from operations (“FFO”) in accordance withFor definitions and discussion of FFO and Normalized FFO, see the standards established by the National Associationsection below entitled "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT. FFO represents net income (loss) (computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from salesFinancial Condition and Results of depreciable operating property, real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. FFO is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because it believes that FFO is beneficial to investors as a starting point inOperations--Non-GAAP Financial Measures." The

measuring our operational performance. Specifically, in excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization and gains and losses from property dispositions, which do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, FFO provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs, FFO will be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs. However, because FFO excludes real estate related depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. In addition, other equity REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition as we do, and, accordingly, our FFO may not be comparable to such other REITs’ FFO. Accordingly, FFO should be considered only as a supplement to net income as a measure of our performance. FFO should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or service indebtedness. FFO also should not be used as a supplement to or substitute for cash flow from operating activities computed in accordance with GAAP. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our FFO and Normalized FFO to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP equivalent, for the periods presented:
 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
 ($ in thousands)
Net income$42,755
 $31,183
 $12,759
 $14,453
 $8,897
Depreciation and amortization35,328
 23,153
 17,569
 14,898
 12,909
Gain loss on real estate dispositions and acquisitions(30,103) (18,394) (2,211) (9,460) —
Real estate joint ventures, net—
 —
 —
 (85) 80
Funds from operations$47,980
 $35,942
 $28,117
 $19,806
 $21,886
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
 ($ in thousands)
Net income attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders$29,590
 $23,492
 $29,925
 $42,755
 $31,183
Depreciation and amortization (1)
53,616
 40,178
 37,321
 35,328
 23,153
Gain on operating real estate dispositions (2)
(3,220) (833) (7,595) (30,103) (18,394)
Impairment of real estate assets—
 1,502
 —
 —
 —
FFO attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders79,986
 64,339
 59,651
 47,980
 35,942
Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs844
 352
 648
 1,563
 1,935
Impairment of intangible assets and liabilities252
 117
 110
 355
 41
Loss on extinguishment of debt30
 11
 50
 82
 512
Amortization of right-of-use assets - finance leases377
 —
 —
 —
 —
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives3,599
 951
 (1,127) 941
 229
Severance related costs—
 688
 —
 —
 —
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders$85,088
 $66,458
 $59,332
 $50,921
 $38,659

(2) Please see calculation of Normalized FFO in "Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis-Liquidity and Capital Resources." This data is not available for the year ended December 31, 2012.
(1) The adjustment for depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 includes $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of depreciation attributable to the Company's investment in One City Center, which was an unconsolidated real estate investment until March 14, 2019. Additionally, the adjustment for depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2019 excludes $1.2 million of depreciation attributable to the Company's joint venture partners.
(2) The adjustment for gain on operating real estate dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2019 excludes the portion of the gain on Lightfoot Marketplace that was allocated to our joint venture partner and excludes the gain on sale of a non-operating land parcel. The adjustment for gain on operating real estate dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2018 excludes the gain on the River City industrial facility because this property was sold before being placed into service. The adjustment for gain on operating real estate dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2017 excludes the gain on the land outparcel at Sandbridge Commons because this was a non-operating parcel. Additionally, the adjustment for gain on real estate dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2016 excludes the gain on the Newport News Economic Authority building because this property was sold before being placed in service.


Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
References to “we,” “our,” “us,”"we," "our," "us," and “our company”"our company" refer to Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with our consolidated subsidiaries, including Armada Hoffler, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership, of which we are the sole general partner and to which we refer in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as our Operating Partnership.
 
Business Description
 
We are a full servicefull-service real estate company with extensive experience developing, building, owning, and managing high-quality, institutional-grade office, retail, and multifamily properties in attractive markets throughout the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern United States. As of December 31, 2016,2019, our stabilized operating property portfolio was comprised of 3742 retail properties, six7 office properties, and five8 multifamily properties. In addition to our operating property portfolio, we had two retail properties, twoone office properties,property, two one multifamily properties, and one mixed-useretail property in various statesstages of development, andredevelopment, or stabilization as of December 31, 2016.2019. We also provide general contracting services to third parties and invest in development projects through mezzanine lending arrangements.


 As of December 31, 2016, we owned 100% of the interests in all of the properties in our operating property portfolio. Substantially all of our assets are held by, and all of our operations are conducted through, our Operating Partnership. We are the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2016,2019, we owned, through a combination of direct and indirect interests, 68.1%72.6% of the outstanding OP units in our operating partnership.Operating Partnership.


We elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2013.


Our principal executive office is located at 222 Central Park Avenue, Suite 2100, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 in the Armada Hoffler Tower at the Virginia Beach Town Center. In addition, we have construction offices located at 249222 Central Park Avenue, Suite 300,1000, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 and 1300 Thames Street, Suite 30, Baltimore, Maryland 21231. The telephone number for our principal executive office is (757) 366-4000. We maintain a website at www.armadahoffler.com.ArmadaHoffler.com. The information on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated into and does not constitute a part of this report.
 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company's accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As disclosed in Note 2, the preparation of these financial statements requires us to exercise our best judgment in making estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, based upon current available information. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
 
We believe the following accounting policies and estimates are the most critical to understanding our reported financial results as their effect on our financial condition and results of operations is material.
Revenue Recognition

Rental Revenues
 
We lease our properties under operating leases and recognize base rents on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We also recognize revenue from tenant recoveries, through which tenants reimburse us for expenses paid by us such as utilities, janitorial, repairs and maintenance, security and alarm, parking lot and grounds, general and administrative, management fees, insurance, and real estate taxes on an accrual basis. Our rental revenues are reduced by the amount of any leasing incentives on a straight-line basis over the term of the applicable lease. We include a renewal period in the lease term only if it appears at lease inception that the renewal is reasonably assured.certain. We begin recognizing rental revenue when the tenant has the right to take possession of or controls the physical use of the property under lease. We maintain control of the physical use of the property under lease if we serve as the general contractor for the tenant.


Rental revenue is recognized subject to management’s evaluation of tenant credit risk. The extended collection period for accrued straight-line rental revenue along with our evaluation of tenant credit risk may result in the non-recognitionnonrecognition of all or a portion of straight-line rental revenue until the collection of substantially all such revenue for a tenant is reasonably assured.probable.
 
General Contracting and Real Estate Services Revenues
 
We recognize general contracting revenues as a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. For each construction contract, we identify the performance obligations, which typically include the delivery of a single building constructed according to the specifications of the contract. We estimate the total transaction price, which generally includes a fixed contract price and may also include variable components such as early completion bonuses, liquidated damages, or cost savings to be shared with the customer. Variable components of the contract price are included in the transaction price to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue on construction contractswill not occur. We recognize the estimated transaction price as revenue as we satisfy our performance obligations; we estimate our progress in satisfying performance obligations for each contract using the percentage-of-completion method. Using thisinput method, we recognize revenue and an estimated profit as construction contract costs are incurred based on the proportion of incurred costs relative to total estimated construction costs underat completion. Construction contract costs include all direct material, direct labor, subcontract costs, and overhead costs directly related to contract performance. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, are all significant judgments that may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which they are determined. Additionally, the estimated costs at completion are affected by management’s forecasts of anticipated costs to be incurred and contingency reserves for exposures related to unknown costs, such as design deficiencies and subcontractor defaults. The estimated variable consideration is also affected by claims and unapproved change orders, which may result from changes in the scope of the contract. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are recognized immediately in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which they are determined.
We include profit incentives in revenues when their realization is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. General contracting andrecognize real estate services revenues from property development and management as we satisfy our performance obligations under these service arrangements.

We assess whether multiple contracts with a single counterparty may be combined into a single contract for the revenue is recognized subject to management’s evaluationrecognition purposes based on factors such as the timing of customer credit risk.the negotiation and execution of the contracts and whether the economic substance of the contracts was contemplated separately or in tandem.

Operating Property Acquisitions
 
Acquisitions of operating properties have been and will generally be accounted for as acquisitions of a group of assets, with costs incurred to effect an acquisition, including title, legal, accounting, brokerage commissions, and other related costs being capitalized as part of the cost of the assets acquired. In connection with operating property acquisitions, we identify and recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimatedrelative fair values as of the acquisition date. The purchase price allocations to tangible assets, such as land, site improvements, and buildings and improvements, are presented within income producing property in the consolidated balance sheets and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Acquired lease intangiblesintangible assets are presented as a separate component of assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Acquired lease intangible liabilities are presented within other assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and amortized over their respective lease terms. The Company amortizessheets. We amortize in-place lease assets as depreciation and amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the related leases. We amortize above-market lease assets as reductions to rental revenues on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the related leases. We amortize below-market lease liabilities as increases to rental revenues on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the related leases. We amortize below-market ground lease assets as increases to rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the related leases. Prior to October 1, 2016, we expensed all costs incurred related to operating property acquisitions. On October 1, 2016, we adopted newly issued accounting guidance that allows capitalization ofWe capitalize the costs related to operating property acquisitions.acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business.
 
We value land based on a market approach, looking to recent sales of similar properties, adjusting for differences due to location, the state of entitlement, as well asand the shape and size of the parcel. Improvements to land are valued using a replacement cost approach. The approach applies industry standard replacement costs adjusted for geographic specific considerations and reduced by estimated depreciation. The value of buildings acquired is estimated using the replacement cost

approach, assuming the buildings were vacant at acquisition. The replacement cost approach considers the composition of the structures acquired, adjusted for an estimate of depreciation. The estimate of depreciation is made considering industry standard information and depreciation curves for the identified asset classes. The value of acquired lease intangiblesintangible assets and liabilities considers the estimated cost of leasing the properties as if the acquired buildings were vacant, as well as the value of the current leases relative to market-rate leases. The in-place lease value is determined using an estimated total lease-up time and lost rental revenues during such time. The value of current leases relative to market-rate leases is based on market rents obtained for market comparables. Given the significance of unobservable inputs used in the valuation of acquired real estate assets, we classify them as Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.
 
We value debt assumed in connection with operating property acquisitions based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the expected cash flows of the debt. Such analysis considers the contractual terms of the debt, including the period to maturity, credit characteristics, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate information asother terms of the acquisition date. We also consider credit valuation adjustments for potential nonperformance risk. We classify the inputs used to value debt assumed in connection with operating property acquisitions asarrangements, which are Level 23 inputs in the fair value hierarchy as they are predominantly observable and market-based.hierarchy.
 
Real Estate Project Costs
 
We capitalize direct and certain indirect costs clearly associated with the development, redevelopment, construction, leasing, or expansion of our real estate assets. Capitalized project costs include direct material, labor, subcontract costs, real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, ground rent, interest on borrowing obligations, and salaries and related personnel costs.
 
We capitalize direct and indirect project costs associated with the initial construction or redevelopment of a property up to the time the property is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. We believe the completion of the building shell is the proper basis for determining substantial completion of initial construction.
 
We also capitalize direct and indirect costs, including interest costs, on vacant space during extended lease-up periods after construction of the building shell has been completed if costs are being incurred to prepare the vacant space for its intended use. If costs and activities incurred to prepare the vacant space for its intended use cease, then cost capitalization is also discontinued until such activities are resumed. Once necessary work has been completed on a vacant space, project costs are no longer capitalized. In addition, all leasing commissions paid to third parties for new leases or lease renewals are capitalized.
 
We depreciate buildings on a straight-line basis over 39 years and tenant improvements over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the term of the related lease.
 
Real Estate Impairment
 
We evaluate our real estate assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If such an evaluation is necessary, we compare the carrying amount of any such real

estate asset with the undiscounted expected future cash flows that are directly associated with, and that are expected to arise as a direct result of, its use and eventual disposition. Our estimate of the expected future cash flows attributable to a real estate asset is based upon, among other things, our estimates regarding future market conditions, rental rates, occupancy levels, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, tenant concessions, and assumptions regarding the residual value of our properties. If the carrying amount of a real estate asset exceeds its associated undiscounted expected future cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss to reduce the carrying amount of the real estate asset to its fair value based on marketplace participant assumptions.

Adoption of New or Revised Accounting StandardsInterest Income
    
AsInterest income on notes receivable is accrued based on the contractual terms of the loans and when, in the opinion of management, it is deemed collectible. Many loans provide for accrual of interest that will not be paid until maturity of the loan. Interest is recognized on these loans at the accrual rate subject to management's determination that accrued interest is ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and the status of development activities, as applicable. If management cannot make this determination, recognition of interest income may be fully or partially deferred until it is ultimately paid.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We evaluate the collectability of both the interest on and principal of each of our notes receivable based primarily upon the value of the underlying development project. We consider factors such as the progress of development activities, including leasing activities, projected development costs, current and projected loan balances, and the estimated realizable value of the loan. The calculation of the estimated realizable value includes an emerging growth company underestimation of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, we can electprojected sales proceeds from the sale of the underlying development property, which is largely dependent on the estimated fair value of the underlying development property and is highly sensitive to adopt newsignificant assumptions based on management’s expectations about future real estate market or revised accounting standards as they are effective for private companies. However, we have electedeconomic conditions and the projected operating results of the property. A loan is determined to opt out of such extended transition period. Therefore,be impaired when, based upon then-current information, it is no longer probable that we will adopt new or revisedbe able to collect all contractual amounts then due from the borrower. The allowance for loan losses reflects management's estimate of loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For a summary of recent accounting standards as they are effective for public companies. This election is irrevocable.pronouncements and the anticipated effects on our consolidated financial statements see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


Segment Results of Operations
 
As of December 31, 2016,2019, we operated our business in four segments: (i) office real estate, (ii) retail real estate, (iii) multifamily residential real estate, and (iv) general contracting and real estate services that are conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”("TRS"). Net operating income (segment revenues minus segment expenses) or “NOI”("NOI") is the measure used by management to assess segment performance and allocate our resources among our segments. NOI is not a measure of operating income or cash flows from operating activities as measured by GAAP and is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. As a result, NOI should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Not all companies calculate NOI in the same manner. We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it assists both investors and management in understanding the core operations of our real estate and construction businesses. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of NOI to net income.income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
 
We define same store properties as those that we owned and operated and that were stabilized for the entirety of both periods compared. Same store properties exclude those that were in lease-up during the periods compared. We generally consider a property to be in lease-up untilstabilized upon the earlier of: (i) the quarter after the property reaches 80% occupancy or (ii) the thirteenth quarter after the property receives its certificate of occupancy. Additionally, any property that is fully or partially taken out of service for the purpose of redevelopment is no longer considered stabilized until the redevelopment activities are complete, the asset is placed back into service, and the stabilization criteria above are again met. A property may also be fully or partially taken out of service as a result of a partial disposition, depending on the significance of the portion of the property disposed. Finally, any property classified as held for sale is taken out of service for the purpose of computing same store operating results.

This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2019 and 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018. Discussions of 2017 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2018 and 2017 that are not included in this Form

10-K can be found in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
 
Office Segment Data

Office rental revenues, property expenses, and NOI for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows ($ in thousands): 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
 ($ in thousands)
Rental revenues$20,929
 $31,534
 $27,827
Rental expenses7,560
 9,888
 8,710
NOI$13,369
 $21,646
 $19,117
Square feet(1)
847,240
 916,316
 918,162
Occupancy(1)
86.8% 95.8% 95.2%
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Rental revenues$33,269
 $20,701
 $19,207
Property expenses12,193
 7,892
 7,342
NOI$21,076
 $12,809
 $11,865
Square feet (1)
1,307,255
 796,509
 799,855
Occupancy (1)
96.6% 93.3% 89.9%

(1)Stabilized properties as of the end of the periods presented.
 
Rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased $10.62019 increased $12.6 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. NOI for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased2019 increased $8.3 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. The decreasesincrease in rental revenues and NOI resulted from the dispositionsacquisition of Richmond Tower and Oyster Point, which occurredOne City Center in March 2019, the first quarter and third quartercommencement of 2016, respectively.
Rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $3.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. NOI for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $2.5 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increasesoperations at Brooks Crossing Office in rental revenues and NOI resulted from the full year operation of 4525 Main Street and our delivery of three new build-to-suit buildings for Oceaneering InternationalApril 2019, and the Commonwealthacquisition of Virginia. These increases were partially offset by property dispositions –Thames Street Wharf in June 2019, as well as increased occupancy across the Sentara Williamsburg medicalrest of the office building that we sold in the first quarter of 2015 and the Virginia Natural Gas office building that we sold in the fourth quarter of 2014.portfolio.



Office Same Store Results
 
Office same store rental revenues, property expenses, and NOI for the comparative years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 and December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 were as follows:follows (in thousands):
 
Years Ended  
 Years Ended  
December 31,   
 December 31,   
Years Ended  
 Years Ended  
2016 (1)
 
2015 (1)
 Change 
2015 (2)
 
2014 (2)
 ChangeDecember 31,   
 December 31,   
($ in thousands)
2019 (1)
 
2018 (1)
 Change 
2018 (2)
 
2017 (2)
 Change
Rental revenues$15,476
 $15,565
 $(89) $24,698
 $24,615
 $83
$21,239
 $20,701
 $538
 $14,125
 $13,615
 $510
Property expenses5,430
 5,709
 (279) 8,175
 8,140
 35
7,735
 7,507
 228
 5,496
 5,196
 300
Same Store NOI$10,046
 $9,856
 $190
 $16,523
 $16,475
 $48
$13,504
 $13,194
 $310
 $8,629
 $8,419
 $210
Non-Same Store NOI3,323
 11,790
 (8,467) 5,123
 2,642
 2,481
7,572
 (385) 7,957
 4,180
 3,446
 734
Segment NOI$13,369
 $21,646
 $(8,277) $21,646
 $19,117
 $2,529
$21,076
 $12,809
 $8,267
 $12,809
 $11,865
 $944

(1)Same store excludes 4525 MainOne City Center, Brooks Crossing Office, and Thames Street the Richmond Tower building, the Oyster Point building, the Oceaneering International building and the Sentara Williamsburg medical office building.Wharf.
(2)Same store excludes 4525 Main Street, the two Commonwealth of Virginia buildings, the Oceaneering International building, the Sentara Williamsburg medicalVirginia-Chesapeake, and Commonwealth of Virginia-Virginia Beach office building and the Virginia Natural Gas office building.buildings.
Same store rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased slightly compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 because of lower occupancy at One Columbus and Armada Hoffler Tower in the Town Center of Virginia Beach. The decrease in rental revenues was more than offset by decreases in property expenses, specifically utilities, which were lower due to lower usage in 2016.
  
Same store rental revenues and NOI for the year ended December 31, 20152019 increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 because of2018 due to higher occupancy at Two Columbus and Armada Hoffler Tower inacross the Town Center of Virginia Beach.same store office portfolio.

Retail Segment Data

Retail rental revenues, property expenses, and NOI for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows ($ in thousands): 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
 ($ in thousands)
Rental revenues$56,511
 $32,064
 $23,956
Rental expenses14,511
 8,843
 7,108
NOI$42,000
 $23,221
 $16,848
Square feet(1)
3,592,558
 1,643,058
 1,200,738
Occupancy(1)
95.8% 95.5% 96.4%
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Rental revenues$77,593
 $67,959
 $63,109
Property expenses19,572
 17,704
 16,409
NOI$58,021
 $50,255
 $46,700
Square feet (1)
4,208,946
 3,702,733
 3,498,480
Occupancy (1)
96.9% 96.2% 96.5%

(1)Stabilized properties as of the end of the periods presented.
 
Rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 20162019 increased $24.4$9.6 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. NOI for the year ended December 31, 20162019 increased $18.8$7.8 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. The increases in rental revenues and NOI resulted primarily from the three property acquisitions completed during 2018, the commencement of operations at Premier Retail during the third quarter of 2018, the acquisition of the additional outparcel phase of Wendover Village in February 2019, the commencement of operations at Market at Mill Creek in April 2019, and new real estate placed into service. During the year endedacquisition of Red Mill Commons and Marketplace at Hilltop in May 2019. These increases were partially offset by the disposal of the leasehold interest in the building previously leased by Home Depot at Broad Creek Shopping Center in December 31, 2016, we acquired2018 as well as the 11-property retail portfolio, Southgate Square, Southshore Shops, Columbus Village II and Renaissance Square and placed into service Brooks Crossingdisposition of Waynesboro Commons in April 2019 and Lightfoot Marketplace.Marketplace in August 2019.
     
Rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $8.1 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. NOI for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $6.4 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increases in rental revenues and NOI resulted primarily from property acquisitions and new real estate

placed into service. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we acquired Perry Hall Marketplace, Stone House Square, Socastee Commons, Columbus Village and Providence Plaza and placed into service Sandbridge Commons.

Retail Same Store Results
 
Retail same store rental revenues, property expenses, and NOI for the comparative years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 and December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 were as follows:follows (in thousands): 
 
Years Ended  
 Years Ended  
December 31,   
 December 31,   
Years Ended  
 Years Ended  
2016 (1)
 
2015 (1)
 Change 
2015 (2)
 
2014 (2)
 ChangeDecember 31,   
 December 31,   
($ in thousands)
2019 (1)
 
2018 (1)
 Change 
2018 (2)
 
2017 (2)
 Change
Rental revenues$26,316
 $25,984
 $332
 $23,948
 $22,986
 $962
$57,651
 $56,435
 $1,216
 $56,693
 $56,348
 $345
Property expenses7,579
 7,485
 94
 7,160
 6,962
 198
13,247
 13,077
 170
 13,156
 12,844
 312
Same Store NOI$18,737
 $18,499
 $238
 $16,788
 $16,024
 $764
$44,404
 $43,358
 $1,046
 $43,537
 $43,504
 $33
Non-Same Store NOI23,263
 4,722
 18,541
 6,433
 824
 5,609
13,617
 6,897
 6,720
 6,718
 3,196
 3,522
Segment NOI$42,000
 $23,221
 $18,779
 $23,221
 $16,848
 $6,373
$58,021
 $50,255
 $7,766
 $50,255
 $46,700
 $3,555

(1)Same store excludes the 11-property retail portfolio,Broad Creek Shopping Center, Brooks Crossing Retail, Premier Retail, Lexington Square, Columbus Village Columbus(due to redevelopment), the additional outparcel phase of Wendover Village II, Greentree Shopping Center,(acquired in February 2019), Market at Mill Creek, Red Mill Commons and Marketplace at Hilltop (acquired in May 2019), Parkway Centre and Indian Lakes Crossing (acquired in January 2018), Waynesboro Commons (disposed in April 2019), and Lightfoot Marketplace Providence Plaza, Perry Hall Marketplace, Renaissance Square, Sandbridge Commons, Socastee Commons, Southgate Square, Southshore Shops and Stone House Square.(disposed in August 2019).
(2)Same store excludes ColumbusLightfoot Marketplace, Brooks Crossing Retail, the outparcel phase of Wendover Village, DimmockIndian Lakes Crossing, Parkway Centre, Lexington Square, GreentreePremier Retail, Broad Creek Shopping Center, Providence Plaza, Perry Hall Marketplace, Sandbridge Commons, Socastee Commons and Stone House Square.Waynesboro Commons.

Same store rental revenues and NOI for the year ended December 31, 20162019 increased slightly compared to the year ended December 31, 20152018. The increases in rental revenues resulted primarily because offrom higher occupancy at Broad Creek, Hanbury Village, North Point, Parkway Marketplace and Fountain Plaza. These increases were partially offset somewhat by lower occupancy at 249 Central Park.as well as higher recoveries from tenants for capital expenditures.
 
Same store
Multifamily Segment Data

Multifamily rental revenues, property expenses, and NOI for the yearyears ended December 31, 2015 increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily because of higher occupancy at South Retail2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows ($ in the Town Center of Virginia Beach and the redeveloped ground floor space at Dick’s at Town Center.
Multifamily Segment Data
thousands): 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
 ($ in thousands)
Rental revenues$21,915
 $17,574
 $12,963
Rental expenses9,462
 8,255
 6,592
NOI$12,453
 $9,319
 $6,371
Apartment units(1)
1,266
 1,109
 626
Occupancy(1)
94.3% 94.2% 95.7%
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Rental revenues$40,477
 $28,298
 $26,421
Property expenses17,528
 13,009
 12,199
NOI$22,949
 $15,289
 $14,222
Apartment units/beds2,580
 1,586
 1,266
Occupancy95.6% 97.3% 92.9%

(1)Stabilized properties as of the end of the periods presented.
 
Rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 20162019 increased $4.3$12.2 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. NOI increased $3.1$7.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. The increases in rental revenues and NOI resulted primarily from the deliverycommencement of operations at Greenside Apartments and Premier Apartments during the third quarter of 2018, the acquisition of 1405 Point in April 2019, the commencement of operations at Hoffler Place in August 2019, and increases in rental rates and occupancy across the rest of the multifamily portfolio, especially at Johns Hopkins Village in August 2016. The increase from Johns Hopkins Village was offset somewhat by the sale of Whetstone Apartments in 2015.and Smith’s Landing.
        
Rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $4.6 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. NOI increased $2.9 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increases in rental

revenues and NOI resulted primarily from our stabilization of both Encore and Liberty Apartments during 2015 as well as higher occupancy at The Cosmopolitan in the Town Center of Virginia Beach.

Multifamily Same Store Results
 
Multifamily same store rental revenues, property expenses, and NOI for the comparative years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 and December 31, 20152018 and 20142017 were as follows:follows (in thousands):
 
Years Ended  
 Years Ended  
December 31,   
 December 31,   
Years Ended  
 Years Ended  
2016 (1)
 
2015 (1)
 Change 
2015 (2)
 
2014 (2)
 ChangeDecember 31,   
 December 31,   
($ in thousands)
2019 (1)
 
2018 (1)
 Change 
2018 (2)
 
2017 (2)
 Change
Rental revenues$12,221
 $12,158
 $63
 $12,159
 $11,638
 $521
$21,849
 $20,241
 $1,608
 $11,834
 $11,473
 $361
Property expenses5,325
 5,249
 76
 5,249
 5,148
 101
8,666
 8,332
 334
 4,989
 4,869
 120
Same Store NOI$6,896
 $6,909
 $(13) $6,910
 $6,490
 $420
$13,183
 $11,909
 $1,274
 $6,845
 $6,604
 $241
Non-Same Store NOI5,557
 2,410
 3,147
 2,409
 (119) 2,528
9,766
 3,380
 6,386
 8,444
 7,618
 826
Segment NOI$12,453
 $9,319
 $3,134
 $9,319
 $6,371
 $2,948
$22,949
 $15,289
 $7,660
 $15,289
 $14,222
 $1,067

(1)Same store excludes Encore Apartments, Johns Hopkins Village, LibertyGreenside Apartments and Whetstone Apartments.Premier Apartments (placed in service in August 2018), 1405 Point (acquired in April 2019), Hoffler Place (placed in service in August 2019), and The Cosmopolitan (due to redevelopment).
(2)Same store excludes EncoreJohns Hopkins Village, Greenside Apartments, LibertyPremier Apartments, and Whetstone Apartments. the Cosmopolitan.
Same store rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 because of higher rental rates at Smith's Landing. This increase was partially offset by lower occupancy at The Cosmopolitan in the Town Center of Virginia Beach. Same store NOI decreased slightly due to an increase in real estate taxes at The Cosmopolitan.

Same store rental revenues and NOI for the year ended December 31, 20152019 increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 because2018 primarily as a result of higherincreases in rental rates and occupancy across the same store multifamily portfolio, especially at The Cosmopolitan in the Town Center of Virginia BeachJohns Hopkins Village and Smith’s Landing.
 

General Contracting and Real Estate Services Segment Data

General contracting and real estate services revenues, expenses, and gross profit for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows ($ in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, 
2016 2015 2014Years Ended December 31, 
($ in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Segment revenues$159,030
 $171,268
 $103,321
$105,859
 $76,359
 $194,034
Gross profit$5,655
 $5,924
 $4,567
$4,321
 $2,731
 $7,444
Operating margin3.6% 3.5% 4.4%4.1% 3.6% 3.8%
Construction backlog$217,718
 $83,433
 $159,139
$242,622
 $165,863
 $49,167
 
Segment revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased $12.22019 increased $29.5 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased $0.32019 increased $1.6 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in segment revenues resulted from lower volume on our construction contracts driven by the completion of the Exelon construction project in the Inner Harbor of Baltimore. The decrease in segment revenue was slightly offset by higher operating margins.
Segment revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $67.9 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $1.4 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014.2018. The increase in segment revenues resulted primarily from the increase in revenues from Interlock Commercial and gross profit resulted from higher volume on ourSolis Apartments at Interlock projects, which were executed at the end of 2018 and began construction contracts driven by the Exelon construction project in the Inner Harbor of Baltimore, which was slightly offset by lower operating margins.2019.
    

The changes in construction backlog for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:follows (in thousands):  
 
Years Ended December 31, 
2016 2015 2014Years Ended December 31, 
($ in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Beginning backlog$83,433
 $159,139
 $46,385
$165,863
 $49,167
 $217,718
New contracts/change orders293,115
 95,356
 215,303
182,495
 192,852
 25,224
Work performed(158,830) (171,062) (102,549)(105,736) (76,156) (193,775)
Ending backlog$217,718
 $83,433
 $159,139
$242,622
 $165,863
 $49,167


During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, we executed several new contracts: Annapolis Junctioncontracts for the Bellyard Hotel at Interlock, Boulder Lakeside Apartments and the Dinwiddie County administration building,27th Street Apartments & Garage projects, which added $50.2$28.0 million, $35.4 million, and $23.0$79.3 million, respectively, to the December 31, 20162019 backlog.


During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, we added $45.9 million to backlogexecuted new contracts for the construction of a new hotelInterlock Commercial and Solis Apartments at the Oceanfront of Virginia Beach, Virginia for a related party development group. Construction is expectedInterlock projects, which added $84.9 million and $62.3 million, respectively, to be completed in time for the 2017 summer season. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had $7.8 million and $40.4 million, respectively, of backlog related to the Oceanfront hotel construction project.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, we executed a $168.8 million contract for the construction of the new headquarters for Exelon’s Constellation business unit in Baltimore, Maryland. Exelon is the nation’s leading competitive energy provider. Construction was completed in the fourth quarter of 2016. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had $26.9 million and $126.0 million, respectively, of backlog related to the Exelon construction project.  2018 backlog.
 

Consolidated Results of Operations
 
The following table summarizes our results of operations for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016:2019, 2018, and 2017: 
 
Years Ended December 31,  2016 2015Years Ended December 31,  2019 2018
2016 2015 2014 Change Change2019 2018 2017 Change Change
($ in thousands)(in thousands)
Revenues 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
  
Rental revenues$99,355
 $81,172
 $64,746
 $18,183
 $16,426
$151,339
 $116,958
 $108,737
 $34,381
 $8,221
General contracting and real estate services revenues159,030
 171,268
 103,321
 (12,238) 67,947
105,859
 76,359
 194,034
 29,500
 (117,675)
Total revenues258,385
 252,440
 168,067
 5,945
 84,373
257,198
 193,317
 302,771
 63,881
 (109,454)
         
Expenses                  
Rental expenses21,904
 19,204
 16,667
 2,700
 2,537
34,332
 27,222
 25,422
 7,110
 1,800
Real estate taxes9,629
 7,782
 5,743
 1,847
 2,039
14,961
 11,383
 10,528
 3,578
 855
General contracting and real estate services expenses153,375
 165,344
 98,754
 (11,969) 66,590
101,538
 73,628
 186,590
 27,910
 (112,962)
Depreciation and amortization35,328
 23,153
 17,569
 12,175
 5,584
54,564
 39,913
 37,321
 14,651
 2,592
Amortization of right-of-use assets - finance leases377
 —
 —
 377
 —
General and administrative expenses9,552
 8,397
 7,711
 1,155
 686
12,392
 11,431
 10,435
 961
 996
Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs1,563
 1,935
 229
 (372) 1,706
844
 352
 648
 492
 (296)
Impairment charges355
 41
 15
 314
 26
252
 1,619
 110
 (1,367) 1,509
Total expenses231,706
 225,856
 146,688
 5,850
 79,168
219,260
 165,548
 271,054
 53,712
 (105,506)
Gain on real estate dispositions4,699
 4,254
 8,087
 445
 (3,833)
Operating income26,679
 26,584
 21,379
 95
 5,205
42,637
 32,023
 39,804
 10,614
 (7,781)
Interest income3,228
 126
 —
 3,102
 126
23,215
 10,729
 7,077
 12,486
 3,652
Interest expense(16,466) (13,333) (10,648) (3,133) (2,685)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(82) (512) —
 430
 (512)
Gain on real estate dispositions30,533
 18,394
 2,211
 12,139
 16,183
Interest expense on indebtedness(30,776) (19,087) (17,439) (11,689) (1,648)
Interest expense on finance leases(568) —
 —
 (568) —
Equity in income of unconsolidated real estate entities273
 372
 —
 (99) 372
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives(941) (229) (233) (712) 4
(3,599) (951) 1,127
 (2,648) (2,078)
Other income147
 119
 120
 28
 (1)
Other income (expense), net585
 377
 81
 208
 296
Income before taxes43,098
 31,149
 12,829
 11,949
 18,320
31,767
 23,463
 30,650
 8,304
 (7,187)
Income tax benefit (provision)(343) 34
 (70) (377) 104
491
 29
 (725) 462
 754
Net income$42,755
 $31,183
 $12,759
 $11,572
 $18,424
32,258
 23,492
 29,925
 8,766
 (6,433)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in investment entities(213) —
 —
 (213) —
Preferred stock dividends(2,455) —
 —
 (2,455) —
Net income attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders$29,590
 $23,492
 $29,925
 $6,098
 $(6,433)
 
Rental Revenues. Rental revenues by segment for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017 were as follows:
follows (in thousands): 
Years Ended December 31,  2016 2015
2016 2015 2014 Change ChangeYears Ended December 31,  2019 2018
($ in thousands)2019 2018 2017 Change Change
Office$20,929
 $31,534
 $27,827
 $(10,605) $3,707
$33,269
 $20,701
 $19,207
 $12,568
 $1,494
Retail56,511
 32,064
 23,956
 24,447
 8,108
77,593
 67,959
 63,109
 9,634
 4,850
Multifamily21,915
 17,574
 12,963
 4,341
 4,611
40,477
 28,298
 26,421
 12,179
 1,877
$99,355
 $81,172
 $64,746
 $18,183
 $16,426
$151,339
 $116,958
 $108,737
 $34,381
 $8,221
 

Rental revenues increased $18.2$34.4 million during the year ended December 31, 20162019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. The decreaseincrease in office rental revenues resulted primarily from the dispositionsacquisition of Richmond TowerOne City Center in March 2019, the commencement of operations at Brooks Crossing Office in April 2019, and Oyster Point, which we soldthe acquisition of Thames Street Wharf in June 2019, as well as increased occupancy across the first and third quartersrest of 2016, respectively.the office portfolio. The increase in retail rental revenues resulted primarily from property acquisitionsthe acquisition of six additional properties during 2018 and new real estate placed into service. During2019, as well as the year ended December 31, 2016, we acquiredcommencement of operations at Premier Retail during the 11-property retail portfolio, Southgate Square, Southshore Shops, Columbus Village IIthird quarter of 2018 and Renaissance Square and placed into service Brooks Crossing and Lightfoot Marketplace. TheMarket at Mill Creek in April 2019. These increases in multifamilyretail rental revenues resulted primarily from the delivery of Johns Hopkins Village in August 2016.


Rental revenues increased $16.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in office rental revenues resulted from the full year operation of 4525 Main Street and our delivery of three new build-to-suit buildings for Oceaneering International and the Commonwealth of Virginia. These increases were partially offset by property dispositions – the Sentara Williamsburg medical office building that we sold in the first quarterdisposition of 2015two properties and the Virginia Natural Gas office building that we sold in the fourth quartera portion of 2014. The increase in retail rental revenues resulted primarily from property acquisitions and new real estate placed into service. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we acquired Perry Hall Marketplace, Stone House Square, Socastee Commons, Columbus Village and Providence Plaza and placed into service Sandbridge Commons.a third property. The increase in multifamily rental revenues resulted primarily from our stabilizationthe commencement of both Encoreoperations at Greenside Apartments and LibertyPremier Apartments as well as higherduring the third quarter of 2018, the acquisition of 1405 Point in April 2019, the commencement of operations at Hoffler Place in August 2019, and increases in rental rates and occupancy at The Cosmopolitan inacross the Town Centerrest of Virginia Beach.the multifamily portfolio.

General Contracting and Real Estate Services Revenues. General contracting and real estate services revenues forincreased $29.5 million during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 decreased $12.2 million and increased $67.9 million, respectively,2019 compared to the respective prior years, becauseyear ended December 31, 2018. The increase resulted primarily from the increase in revenues from Interlock Commercial and Solis Apartments at Interlock projects that were executed at the end of lower volume on our2018 and began construction contracts, due to the completion of the Exelon construction project in 2016.  2019.

Rental Expenses. Rental expenses by segment for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019 were as follows: 
follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,  2016 2015
2016 2015 2014 Change ChangeYears Ended December 31,  2019 2018
($ in thousands)2019 2018 2017 Change Change
Office$5,560
 $6,938
 $6,395
 $(1,378) $543
$8,722
 $5,858
 $5,483
 $2,864
 $375
Retail9,116
 5,915
 5,011
 3,201
 904
11,656
 10,903
 10,234
 753
 669
Multifamily7,228
 6,351
 5,261
 877
 1,090
13,954
 10,461
 9,705
 3,493
 756
$21,904
 $19,204
 $16,667
 $2,700
 $2,537
$34,332
 $27,222
 $25,422
 $7,110
 $1,800
 
Rental expenses increased $2.7$7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 20162019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. Office rental expenses decreasedincreased primarily due toas a result of the acquisition of One City Center in March 2019, the commencement of operations at Brooks Crossing Office in April 2019, and the acquisition of Thames Street Wharf in June 2019. The increase in retail rental expenses resulted primarily from the acquisition of six additional properties during 2018 and 2019, as well as the commencement of operations at Premier Retail during the third quarter of 2018 and Market at Mill Creek in April 2019. These increases in retail rental expenses were partially offset by the disposition of Richmond Towertwo properties and Oyster Point. Retaila portion of a third property. The increase in multifamily rental expenses increased becauseresulted primarily from the commencement of property acquisitions and new real estate placed into service. Multifamily rental expenses increased because of increased leasingoperations at both Encore and LibertyGreenside Apartments and Premier Apartments during the deliverythird quarter of Johns Hopkins Village2018, the acquisition of 1405 Point in April 2019, and the commencement of operations at Hoffler Place in August 2016.2019.
    
Rental expensesReal Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes by segment for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 were as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,  2019 2018
 2019 2018 2017 Change Change
Office3,471
 2,034
 1,859
 $1,437
 $175
Retail7,916
 6,801
 6,175
 1,115
 626
Multifamily3,574
 2,548
 2,494
 1,026
 54
 $14,961
 $11,383
 $10,528
 $3,578
 $855
Real estate taxes increased $2.5$3.6 million during the year ended December 31, 20152019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014.2018. Office rental expenses increased primarily because of the full year operation of 4525 Main Street. Retail rental expenses increased because of property acquisitions and new real estate placed into service.
Real Estate Taxes. Real estate taxes by segment for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
 Years Ended December 31,  2016 2015
 2016 2015 2014 Change Change
 ($ in thousands)
Office2,000
 2,950
 2,315
 $(950) $635
Retail5,395
 2,928
 2,097
 2,467
 831
Multifamily2,234
 1,904
 1,331
 330
 573
 $9,629
 $7,782
 $5,743
 $1,847
 $2,039
Real estate taxes increased $1.8 millionprimarily as a result of the acquisition of One City Center in March 2019, the commencement of operations at Brooks Crossing Office in April 2019, and the acquisition of Thames Street Wharf in June 2019. The increase in retail real estate taxes resulted primarily from the acquisition of six additional properties during 2018 and 2019, as well as the commencement of operations at Premier Retail during the third quarter of 2018 and Market at Mill Creek in April 2019. These increases in retail real estate taxes were partially offset by the disposition of two properties and a portion of a third property. The increase in multifamily real estate taxes resulted primarily from the commencement of operations at Greenside Apartments and Premier Apartments during the third quarter of 2018, the acquisition of 1405 Point in April 2019, and the commencement of operations at Hoffler Place in August 2019.

General Contracting and Real Estate Services Expenses.General contracting and real estate services expenses for the year ended December 31, 20162019 increased $27.9 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. Office real estate taxes decreased2018. The increase resulted primarily becausefrom the increase in expenses from Interlock Commercial and Solis Apartments at Interlock projects, which were executed at the end of 2018 and began construction in 2019.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization for the dispositions of Richmond Tower and Oyster Point. Retail real estate taxesyear ended December 31, 2019 increased because of$14.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was attributable to property acquisitions, new real estate placed into service, and reassessments. Multifamily real estate taxes increased becauseaccelerated depreciation relating to assets that were placed into redevelopment. The increase was partially offset by dispositions in 2019 and certain assets that became fully depreciated.

Amortization of right-of-use assets - finance leases. Amortization of right-of-use assets - finance leases relates to new ground leases acquired during 2019 for which the reassessmentCompany is the lessee, which are classified as finance leases. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Encore Apartments, The Cosmopolitan and the delivery of Johns Hopkins Village in August 2016.this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Real estate taxes increased $2.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. Office real estate taxes increased primarily because of the full year operation of 4525 Main Street.

Retail real estate taxes increased because of property acquisitionsGeneral and new real estate placed into service. Multifamily real estate taxes increased because of the reassessment of Encore Apartments.
Administrative Expenses.General Contracting and Real Estate Services Expenses.General contracting and real estate servicesadministrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 decreased $12.0 million and increased $66.6 million compared to the respective prior years, because of lower volume on our construction contracts, primarily due to the completion of the Exelon construction project in 2016. 
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 20162019 increased $12.2$1.0 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. The increase resulted from higher compensation and benefit costs from increased employee headcount and higher charitable contributions made during 2019.
Acquisition, Development and Other Pursuit Costs. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we recognized $0.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of costs relating primarily to predevelopment costs for projects that are no longer viable.
Impairment Charges. Impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily relate to the tenants that vacated prior to their lease expiration. Impairment charges were greater than normal during the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily due to the impairment of Waynesboro Commons.

Gain on Real Estate Dispositions. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized gains on real estate dispositions of $4.7 million, related to the sale of Lightfoot Marketplace and a non-operating land parcel. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized gains on real estate dispositions of $4.3 million, which included a gain of $3.4 million on our sale of the River City industrial facility and a gain of $0.8 million on our sale of the leasehold interest in the building previously leased by Home Depot at Broad Creek Shopping Center.
Interest Income. Interest income for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 totaled $23.2 million and $10.7 million, respectively, and was attributable to property acquisitionsour mezzanine loans. As of December 31, 2019 and new real estate placed into service. Depreciation2018, our outstanding mezzanine loan balances were $153.0 million and amortization$139.1 million, respectively.
Interest expense on indebtedness. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 20152019 increased $5.6$11.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The2018 primarily as a result of the increase was attributablein interest rates between periods and the increase in net indebtedness of $256.3 million during 2019 through increased borrowings on the corporate credit facility, construction loans, and additional borrowings on the refinanced property loans.

Interest expense on finance leases. Interest expense on finance leases relates to property acquisitions and new ground leases acquired during 2019 for which the Company is the lessee, which are classified as finance leases. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Equity in income of unconsolidated real estate placed into service.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expensesentities. Equity in income of unconsolidated real estate entities for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015 increased $1.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively, compared to the respective prior years, because of higher regulatory and compliance costs as well as higher compensation and benefit costs from increased employee headcount.
Acquisition, Development and Other Pursuit Costs. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized $1.6 million of costs primarily attributable to our acquisitions of an 11-property retail portfolio,Southgate Square and Southshore Shops. We adopted new accounting guidance on October 1, 2016 which allowed us to capitalize $0.7 million in costs related to the acquisitions of Renaissance Square and Columbus Village II. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized $1.9 million of costs primarily attributable to our acquisitions of Perry Hall Marketplace, Stone House Square, Socastee Commons, Columbus Village, Providence Plaza and an 11-property retail portfolio. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recognized $0.2 million of costs related primarily to our acquisition of Dimmock Square.
Impairment Charges. Impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2016 were $0.4 million, primarily related to tenants who vacated prior to their lease expiration. Impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were nominal.
Interest Income. Interest income is attributable2018 relates to our investment in One City Center, which was an unconsolidated real estate investment until we purchased the Annapolis Junctionretail and Point Street Apartments projects throughoffice portion of the property from our loans to the respective mezzanine borrowers. As of December 31, 2016, we had funded $59.5 million through our mezzanine loan program.partner on March 14, 2019.
    
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $3.1 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 because of new real estate placed into service, increased borrowing on our credit facility and additional debt assumed in connection with operating property acquisitions. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $2.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 because of new real estate placed into service and additional debt assumed in connection with operating property acquisitions, in addition to rising interest rates.  
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized a $0.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt representing the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with our refinancing of the mortgages secured by 249 Central Park Retail, South Retail, Fountain Plaza, 4525 Main Street and Encore Apartments. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a $0.5 million loss on extinguishment of debt representing the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with our refinancing of the mortgage secured by Smith’s Landing as well as our repayment of the Whetstone Apartments and Oceaneering construction loans.
Gain on Real Estate Dispositions and Acquisitions. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized gains on real estate acquisitions of $30.5 million compared to $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The 2016 gains consisted of a $26.2 million gain on the sale of Richmond Tower, $3.8 million gain on Oyster Point and a $0.4 million gain on the Newport News Economic Development Authority building. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized gains on real estate dispositions of $18.4 million compared to $2.2 million of gains on real estate dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a $6.2 million gain on our sale of the Sentara Williamsburg medical office building, a $7.2 million gain on our sale of Whetstone Apartments and a $5.0 million gain on our sale of the Oceaneering building. On November 20, 2014, we completed the sale of the Virginia Natural Gas office building and recognized a gain on disposition of $2.2 million.


Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Derivatives. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, we recognized losses on changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives of $0.9$3.6 million, compared due to $0.2 million forprojected decreases in interest rate forward curves.
During the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase is primarily2018, we recognized losses on changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives of $1.0 million, due to the dedesignation of ourprojected increases in interest rate swaps during the three months ended March 31, 2016. In 2016, all activity for both interest rate caps and swaps were reclassed out of other income to this line item.forward curves at that time.
 
Other Income. Other income for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 was relatively unchanged, comparedwith a small increase in 2019 due to the year ended December 31, 2014.miscellaneous non-tenant income.
 

Income Taxes. Our TRS, through which we conduct our development and construction business, arisis subject to federal, state, and local corporate income taxes. The income tax benefit (provision) recognized during the three years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019 and 20142018 is attributable to the (losses)taxable profits and losses of our development and construction businesses that we operate through our TRS.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Overview
 
We believe our primary short-term liquidity requirements consist of general contractor expenses, operating expenses, and other expenditures associated with our properties, including tenant improvements, leasing commissions and leasing incentives, dividend payments to our stockholders required to maintain our REIT qualification, debt service, capital expenditures, new real estate development projects, mezzanine loan funding requirements, and strategic acquisitions. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash provided by operations, reserves established from existing cash, borrowings under construction loans to fund new real estate development and construction, and borrowings available under our credit facility, and net proceeds from the sale of common stock through our 2016 at-the-market continuous equity offering program (“2016 ATM Equity Offering Program”(the "ATM Program")., which is discussed below.
 
Our long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary for the repayment of debt at or prior to maturity, general contracting expenses, property development and acquisitions, tenant improvements, and capital improvements. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements with net cash from operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, and the issuance of equity and debt securities. We also may fund property development and acquisitions and capital improvements using our credit facility pending long-term financing.
 
As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $21.9 million and restricted cash in escrow of $3.3$39.2 million available for both current liquidity needs as well as development activities. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we also had restricted cash in escrow of $4.3 million, some of which is available for capital expenditures at our operating properties. As of December 31, 2019, we had $43.0$40.0 million available under our credit facility and $19.1 million available for future issuance under our 2016 ATM Equity Offering Program to meet our short-term liquidity requirements.requirements and $58.1 million available under construction loans to fund development activities.

ATM Program

On February 1, 2017, we increased the borrowings under the senior unsecured term loan facility to $125.0 million and increased the total capacity of the senior unsecured credit facility to $275.0 million, pursuant to the accordion feature of the credit facility. 

ATM Equity Offering Program
On May 4, 2016,26, 2018, we commenced the 2016 ATM Program through which we may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of common stock. On August 6, 2019, we entered into amendments (the "Amendments") to the separate sales agreements related to the ATM Program, which, among other things, increased the aggregate offering price of shares of our common stock under the ATM Program from $125.0 million to $180.7 million. Prior to the date of the ATM Amendments, we had sold shares having an aggregate offering price of up to$105.7 million, resulting in shares having an aggregate offering price of $75.0 million. Upon commencing our 2016million remaining available for sale under the ATM Program as of August 6, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we simultaneously terminated our prior $50.0 million at-the-market continuous equity offering program (the "Prior ATM Program"), which we entered into in May 2015issued and under which we sold an aggregate of 2,261,0685,871,519 shares of common stock resulting in aggregate net proceeds of $23.1 million. Our sale of shares under the 2016 ATM Program will depend on a variety of factors, including among other things, market conditions, the trading price of our common stock, capital needs and our determination of appropriate sources of funding. We have no obligation to sell any shares and may at any time suspend or terminate the 2016 ATM Program. Each of our sales agents are entitled to a commission of up to 1.5% of the gross offering proceeds of shares that they sell through the 2016 ATM Program. We intend to use any net proceeds from the sale of shares through the 2016 ATM Program to fund development or redevelopment activities, fund potential acquisition opportunities, repay indebtedness, including amounts outstanding under our credit facility, or for general corporate purposes. During the three months and year ended December 31, 2016, we raised $17.4 million and $55.9 million of gross proceeds, respectively, at a weighted average price of $14.10 and $13.45$16.76 per share respectively, under the 2016 ATM Program, resulting inreceiving net proceeds of $97.0 million after offering costs and commissionscommissions.

As of $17.1December 31, 2019, we had $15.9 million in availability under the ATM Program.

Series A Preferred Stock Offering

On June 18, 2019, we issued 2,530,000 shares of 6.75% Series A Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, which included 330,000 shares issued upon the underwriters’ full exercise of their option to purchase additional shares. Net proceeds from the offering, after the underwriting discount but before offering expenses payable by us, were approximately $61.3 million. We used the net proceeds to fund a portion of the purchase price of Thames Street Wharf, a 263,426 square foot office building located in the Harbor Point neighborhood of Baltimore, Maryland. The balance of the net proceeds was used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and $54.8 million, respectively.for general corporate purposes.


Credit Facility

On February 20, 2015,October 3, 2019, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the "credit agreement"), which provides for a $200.0$355.0 million senior unsecured credit facility that includescomprised of a $150.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the "revolving credit facility") and a $50.0$205.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility. The credit facility replaced(the "term loan facility" and, together with the prior $155.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, that was scheduled to mature on May 13, 2016.the "credit facility"), with a syndicate of banks. We intend to use future borrowings under the credit

facility for general corporate purposes, including funding acquisitions, mezzanine lending, and development and redevelopment of properties in our portfolio and for working capital.

The credit facility includes an accordion feature that allows the total commitments to be increased to $350.0$700.0 million, subject to certain conditions. On January 5, 2016 and March 31, 2016, we increased the total borrowing capacity to $225.0 million and $250.0 million, respectively. The amount permitted to be borrowed under the credit facility, together with all of our other unsecured indebtedness, is generally limited to the lesser of: (i) 60% of the value of our unencumbered borrowing base properties, (ii) the maximum amount of principal that would result in a debt service coverage ratio of 1.50 to 1.0, and (iii) the maximum aggregate loan commitment, which was $250.0 million as of December 31, 2016.
conditions, including obtaining commitments from any one or more lenders. The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2019,January 24, 2024, with two six-month extension options, subject to certain conditions, including payment of a one-year0.075% extension option.fee at each extension. The term loan facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2020. We may, at any time, voluntarily prepay any loan under the credit facility in whole or in part without a material premium or penalty.January 24, 2025.

The revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR (the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) plus 1.40%a margin ranging from 1.30% to 2.00%1.85%, depending on our total leverage. Theand the term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35%a margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.95%1.80%, in each case depending on our total leverage. We are also obligated to pay an unused commitment fee of 15 or 25 basis points on the unused portions of the commitments under the revolving credit facility, depending on the amount of borrowings under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2019, the interest rates on the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility were 3.26% and 3.21%, respectively. If we attain investment grade credit ratings from S&P and Moody’s, we may elect to have borrowings become subject to interest rates based on oursuch credit ratings. We may, at any time, voluntarily prepay any loan under the credit facility in whole or in part without premium or penalty.


The Operating Partnership is the borrower under the credit facility, and its obligations under the credit facility are guaranteed by us and certain of its subsidiaries that are not otherwise prohibited from providing such guaranty.

The credit agreement contains customary representations and warranties and financial and other affirmative and negative covenants. Our ability to borrow under the credit facility requires usis subject to complyour ongoing compliance with variousa number of financial covenants, affirmative covenants and other restrictions, including the following:

Total leverage ratio of the Company of not more than 60% (or 65% for the two consecutive quarters following any acquisition that is equalwith a purchase price of at least up to or greater than 10% of our total asset value (as defined in the credit agreement),$100.0 million, but only up to two times during the term of the credit facility);
Ratio of adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) to fixed charges of the Company of not less than 1.50 to 1.0;
Tangible net worth of not less than the sum of $220.0 million$567,106,000 and amount equal to 75% of the net equity proceeds received after December 31, 2014;
Ratio of variable rate indebtedness to total asset value of not more than 30%;June 30, 2019;
Ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value of not more than 45%40%; and
Ratio of secured recourse debt to total asset value of not more than 25%20%;
Total unsecured leverage ratio of not more than 60% (or 65% for the two consecutive quarters following any acquisition with a purchase price of at least up to $100.0 million, but only up to two times during the term of the credit facility);
Unencumbered interest coverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) of not less than 1.75 to 1.0;
Maintenance of a minimum of at least 15 unencumbered properties (as defined in the credit agreement) with an unencumbered asset value (as defined in the credit agreement) of not less than $300.0 million at any time; and
Minimum occupancy rate (as defined in the credit agreement) for all unencumbered properties of not less than 80% at any time.
Maximum aggregate rental revenue from any single tenant of not more than 30% of rental revenues with respect to all leases of unencumbered properties (as defined in the credit agreement).

The credit facilityagreement limits our ability to pay cash dividends. However, so long as no default or event of default exists, the credit agreement allows us to pay cash dividends with respect to any 12-month period in an amount not to exceed the greater of: (i) 95% of adjusted funds from operations (as defined in the credit agreement) or (ii) the amount required for us (a) to maintain our status as a REIT and (b) to avoid income or excise tax under the Code. If certain defaults or events of default exist, we may pay cash dividends with respect to any 12-month period to the extent necessary to maintain our status as a REIT. The credit facilityagreement also restricts the amount of capital that we can invest in specific categories of assets, such as unimproved land holdings, development properties, notes receivable, mortgages, mezzanine loans, and unconsolidated affiliates.affiliates, and restricts the amount of stock and OP units that we may repurchase during the term of the credit facility.

On February 1, 2017, we increased the borrowingsWe may, at any time, voluntarily prepay any loan under the senior unsecured term loancredit facility in whole or in part without premium or penalty, except for those portions subject to $125.0 millionan interest rate swap agreement.

The credit agreement includes customary events of default, in certain cases subject to customary periods to cure. The occurrence of an event of default, following the applicable cure period, would permit the lenders to, among other things, declare the unpaid principal, accrued and increasedunpaid interest, and all other amounts payable under the total capacity of the senior unsecured credit facility to $275.0 million, pursuant to the accordion feature of the credit facility.be immediately due and payable.
 

We are currently in compliance with all covenants under the credit facility.agreement.



Consolidated Indebtedness
 
The following table sets forth our consolidated indebtedness as of December 31, 20162019 ($ in thousands):
      Effective Rate for    
  Amount Interest Variable-Rate   Balance at
Secured Debt Outstanding Rate(a) Debt    Maturity Date Maturity
249 Central Park Retail $17,076
 LIBOR + 1.95%
 2.72% August 8, 2021 $15,959
South Retail 7,493
 LIBOR + 1.95%
 2.72% August 8, 2021 7,002
Fountain Plaza Retail 10,281
 LIBOR + 1.95%
 2.72% August 8, 2021 9,608
4525 Main Street 32,034
 3.25%   September 10, 2021 30,774
Encore Apartments 24,966
 3.25%   September 10, 2021 24,006
North Point Note 5 643
 LIBOR + 2.00%
 3.57%(b)  February 1, 2017 643
Harrisonburg Regal 3,256
 6.06%  
 June 8, 2017 3,165
Commonwealth of Virginia – Chesapeake 4,933
 LIBOR + 1.90%
 2.67% August 28, 2017 4,933
Hanbury Village 20,709
 6.67%  
 October 11, 2017 20,499
Lightfoot Marketplace 12,194
 LIBOR + 1.90%
 2.67% November 14, 2017 12,194
Sandbridge Commons 9,376
 LIBOR + 1.85%
 2.62% January 17, 2018 9,129
Southgate Square 21,150
 LIBOR + 2.00%
 2.77% April 29, 2021 18,925
Columbus Village Note 1 6,258
 LIBOR + 2.00%
 3.05%(b)  April 5, 2018 6,033
Columbus Village Note 2 2,266
 LIBOR + 2.00%
 2.77% April 5, 2018 2,207
Johns Hopkins Village 43,841
 LIBOR + 1.90%
 2.67% July 30, 2018 43,841
North Point Note 1 9,776
 6.45%  
 February 5, 2019 9,333
Socastee Commons 4,866
 4.57%  
 January 6, 2023 4,223
North Point Note 2 2,564
 7.25%  
 September 15, 2025 1,344
Smith's Landing 20,511
 4.05%  
 June 1, 2035 —
Liberty Apartments 20,005
 5.66%  
 November 1, 2043 —
The Cosmopolitan 45,884
 3.75%  
 July 1, 2051 —
Total secured debt $320,082
  
  
   $223,818
Unsecured Debt  
  
  
    
Revolving credit facility 107,000
 LIBOR+1.40%-2.00%
 2.32% February 20, 2019 107,000
Term loan 50,000
 LIBOR+1.35%-1.95%
 3.50%(b)  February 20, 2020 50,000
Term loan 50,000
 LIBOR+1.35%-1.95%
 2.27% February 20, 2020 50,000
Total unsecured debt $207,000
  
  
   $207,000
Unamortized GAAP adjustments (4,902)  
  
   —
Indebtedness, net $522,180
  
  
   $430,818
      Effective Rate for    
  Amount Interest Variable-Rate   Balance at
Secured Debt Outstanding 
Rate (a)
 Debt    Maturity Date Maturity
Hoffler Place (b)
 $29,059
 LIBOR + 3.24%
 5.00% January 1, 2021 $29,059
Summit Place (b)
 28,824
 LIBOR + 3.24%
 5.00% January 1, 2021 28,824
Southgate Square 20,562
 LIBOR + 1.60%
 3.36% April 29, 2021 19,462
Encore Apartments (c)
 24,842
 3.25% 

 September 10, 2021 23,993
4525 Main Street (c)
 31,876
 3.25% 

 September 10, 2021 30,786
Red Mill West 11,296
 4.23% 

 June 1, 2022 10,187
Thames Street Wharf 70,000
 LIBOR + 1.30%
 3.06% June 26, 2022 70,000
Hanbury Village 18,515
 3.78% 

 August 15, 2022 17,121
Marketplace at Hilltop 10,517
 4.42% 

 October 1, 2022 9,383
1405 Point 53,000
 LIBOR + 2.25%
 4.01% January 1, 2023 51,532
Socastee Commons 4,567
 4.57% 

 January 6, 2023 4,223
Sandbridge Commons 8,020
 LIBOR + 1.75%
 3.51% January 17, 2023 7,247
Wills Wharf 29,154
 LIBOR + 2.25%
 4.01% June 26, 2023 29,154
249 Central Park Retail (d)
 16,828
 LIBOR + 1.60%
 3.85%
(e) 
August 10, 2023 15,935
Fountain Plaza Retail (d)
 10,127
 LIBOR + 1.60%
 3.85%
(e) 
August 10, 2023 9,590
South Retail (d)
 7,388
 LIBOR + 1.60%
 3.85%
(e) 
August 10, 2023 6,996
One City Center 25,286
 LIBOR + 1.85%
 3.61% April 1, 2024 22,559
Red Mill Central 2,538
 4.80% 

 June 17, 2024 1,765
Premier Apartments (f)
 16,750
 LIBOR + 1.55%
 3.31% October 31, 2024 15,848
Premier Retail (f)
 8,250
 LIBOR + 1.55%
 3.31% October 31, 2024 7,806
Red Mill South 6,137
 3.57% 

 May 1, 2025 4,383
Brooks Crossing Office 14,411
 LIBOR + 1.60%
 3.36% July 1, 2025 11,181
Market at Mill Creek 14,727
 LIBOR + 1.55%
 3.31% July 12, 2025 11,167
Johns Hopkins Village 51,800
 LIBOR + 1.25%
 4.19%
(e) 
August 7, 2025 45,967
North Point Center Note 2 2,214
 7.25% 

 September 15, 2025 1,328
Lexington Square 14,696
 4.50% 

 September 1, 2028 12,044
Red Mill North 4,394
 4.73% 

 December 31, 2028 3,295
Greenside Apartments 34,000
 3.17% 

 December 15, 2029 26,329
Smith's Landing 18,174
 4.05% 

 June 1, 2035 384
Liberty Apartments 14,165
 5.66% 

 November 1, 2043 —
The Cosmopolitan 43,702
 3.35%   July 1, 2051 —
Total secured debt $645,819
       $527,548
Unsecured Debt          
Senior unsecured revolving credit facility 110,000
 LIBOR+1.30%-1.85%
 3.26% January 24, 2024 110,000
Senior unsecured term loan 44,500
 LIBOR+1.25%-1.80%
 3.21% January 24, 2025 44,500
Senior unsecured term loan 160,500
 LIBOR+1.25%-1.80%
 3.55% - 4.57%
(e) 
January 24, 2025 160,500
Total unsecured debt $315,000
       $315,000
Total principal balances 960,819
       842,548
Unamortized GAAP adjustments (10,282)       —
Indebtedness, net $950,537
       $842,548

(a)LIBOR is determined by individual lenders.
(b)Subject to an interest rate swap agreement.
(a) LIBOR rate is determined by individual lenders.
(b) Cross collateralized.
(c) Cross collateralized.
(d) Cross collateralized.
(e) Includes debt subject to interest rate swap agreements.
(f) Cross collateralized.

We currently are in compliance with all covenants on our outstanding indebtedness.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, our outstanding indebtedness maturesscheduled principal repayments and maturities during each of the followingnext five years and thereafter were as follows ($ in thousands):
   Percentage of   Percentage of
Year(1) 
Amount Due 
 
Total 
 Amount Due Total 
2017 $45,210
 9%
2018 64,528
 12%
2019 119,818
 23%
2020 104,482
 20% $10,191
 1%
2021 109,862
 21% 143,038
 15%
2022 116,374
 12%
2023 132,429
 14%
2024 164,960
 17%
Thereafter 83,182
 15% 393,827
 41%
 $527,082
 100% $960,819
 100%

(1) Does not reflect the exercise of any maturity extension options.
 
Interest Rate Derivatives
 
We may use interest rate derivatives from time to time to manage our exposure to interest rate risks. Using an interest rate swap lock, we fixed our interest payments under North Point Center Note 5 at 3.57% through maturity on February 1, 2017.
On February 20, 2015, we entered into a $50.0 millionAs of December 31, 2019, the Company held the following floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $50.0 million interest rate swap has a fixed rate of 2.00%, an effective date of March 1, 2016 and a maturity date of February 20, 2020. We entered into this interest rate swap agreementswaps ($ in connection with the new $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility that bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%, depending on our total leverage.thousands):

On July 13, 2015, we entered into a $6.5 million floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $6.5 million interest rate swap has a fixed rate of 3.05%, an effective date of July 13, 2015 and a maturity date of April 5, 2018.
Related Debt Notional Amount  Index Swap Fixed Rate Debt effective rate Effective Date Expiration Date
Senior unsecured term loan $50,000
  1-month LIBOR 2.00% 3.45% 3/1/2016 2/20/2020
Senior unsecured term loan 50,000
  1-month LIBOR 2.78% 4.23% 5/1/2018 5/1/2023
John Hopkins Village 51,800
(a) 
 1-month LIBOR 2.94% 4.19% 8/7/2018 8/7/2025
Senior unsecured term loan 10,500
(a)(b) 
 1-month LIBOR 3.02% 4.47% 10/12/2018 10/12/2023
249 Central Park Retail, South Retail, and Fountain Plaza Retail 34,342
(a) 
 1-month LIBOR 2.25% 3.85% 4/1/2019 8/10/2023
Senior unsecured term loan 50,000
(a) 
 1-month LIBOR 2.26% 3.71% 4/1/2019 10/26/2022
Total $246,642
           

(a) Designated as a cash flow hedge.
(b) Prior to August 15, 2019, this swap was used as a hedge for the cash flows for the loan secured by Lightfoot Marketplace.
On October 26, 2015, we entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $75.0 million at a strike rate of 1.25% for a premium of $0.1 million. The interest rate cap agreement expires on October 15, 2017.
On February 25, 2016, we entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $75.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50% for a premium of less than $0.1 million.  The interest rate cap agreement expires on March 1, 2018.

On June 17, 2016, we entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $70.0 million at a strike rate of 1.00% for a premium of less than $0.1 million. The interest rate cap agreement expires on June 17, 2018.
On February 7, 2017, we entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $50.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50% for a premium of $0.2 million. The interest rate cap expires on March 1, 2019.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, we were party to the following LIBOR interest rate cap agreements ($ in thousands):  
Effective Date Maturity Date Strike Rate Notional Amount
March 14, 2014 March 1, 2017 1.25% $50,000
October 26, 2015 October 15, 2017 1.25% 75,000
February 25, 2016 March 1, 2018 1.50% 75,000
June 17, 2016 June 17, 2018 1.00% 70,000
Total     $270,000
Effective Date Maturity Date Strike Rate Notional Amount
3/7/2018 4/1/2020 2.25% 50,000
7/16/2018 8/1/2020 2.50% 50,000
12/11/2018 1/1/2021 2.75% 50,000
5/15/2019 6/1/2022 2.50% 100,000
Total     $250,000
 


Contractual Obligations
 
The following table summarizes the future payments for known contractual obligations as of December 31, 20162019 (in thousands):
 
   Payments due by period   Payments due by period
   Less than 1 – 3 3 – 5 More than   Less than 1 – 3 3 – 5 More than
Contractual Obligations Total 1 year years years 5 years Total 1 year years years 5 years
Principal payments of long-term indebtedness $527,082
 $45,210
 $184,346
 $214,344
 $83,182
Principal payments and maturities of long-term indebtedness $960,819
 $10,191
 $259,412
 $297,389
 $393,827
Ground and other operating leases 100,660
 1,845
 3,679
 3,683
 91,453
 162,309
 2,944
 6,230
 6,597
 146,538
Long-term debt—fixed interest 84,226
 10,467
 15,891
 10,755
 47,113
Long-term debt—variable interest(1) (2)
 14,534
 3,683
 9,433
 1,418
 —
Interest payments on long-term debt—fixed interest 126,282
 19,952
 36,223
 29,308
 40,799
Interest payments on long-term debt—variable interest (1)(2)
 57,206
 17,351
 26,866
 12,424
 565
Tenant-related and other commitments 2,906
 2,791
 —
 —
 115
 27,182
 26,262
 805
 —
 115
Total(3) $729,408
 $63,996
 $213,349
 $230,200
 $221,863
 $1,333,798
 $76,700
 $329,536
 $345,718
 $581,844

(1)For long-term debt that bears interest at variable rates, we estimated future interest payments using the indexed rates as of December 31, 2016.2019. LIBOR as of December 31, 20162019 was 77176 basis points.
(2)Assumes the balance outstanding of $107$110.0 million and the weighted average interest rate of 2.32%3.26% in effect at December 31, 20162019 remain in effect until maturity of our secured revolving credit facility. Amounts also include unused credit facility fees assuming the balance outstanding at December 31, 20162019 remains outstanding through maturity of our secured revolving credit facility.
(3)Contractual obligations above do not include funding obligations to non-wholly owned development projects as well as unfunded mezzanine loan commitments due to the uncertainty of the timing and amounts of certain of these obligations. Refer to "Item 1. Business" for information about our development projects and mezzanine loans.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
WeIn connection with our mezzanine lending activities, we have entered into standby lettersmade guarantees to pay portions of credit relating tocertain senior loans of third parties associated with the guarantee of future performance on certain of our construction contracts. Letters of credit generally are available for draw down indevelopment projects. The following table summarizes the event we do not perform. Asguarantees made by us as of December 31, 2016, we had aggregate outstanding letters of credit totaling $4.1 million, all of which expire during 2017. However, all of our standby letters of credit are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the underlying contractual obligation.2019 (in thousands):

 Payment guarantee amount
The Residences at Annapolis Junction $8,300
Delray Plaza 5,180
Nexton Square 12,600
Interlock Commercial 30,654
Total $56,734

Cash Flows
 Years Ended  
 December 31,   
 2019 2018 Change
 ($ in thousands)
Operating Activities$67,729
 $56,087
 $11,642
Investing Activities(295,063) (240,563) (54,500)
Financing Activities246,862
 185,611
 61,251
Net Increase$19,528
 $1,135
 $18,393
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash, Beginning of Period$24,051
 $22,916
  
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash, End of Period$43,579
 $24,051
  


Years Ended  Years Ended  
December 31,   December 31,   
2016 2015 Change2018 2017 Change
($ in thousands)($ in thousands)
Operating Activities$59,770
 $33,086
 $26,684
$56,087
 $51,236
 $4,851
Investing Activities(226,461) (56,381) (170,080)(240,563) (95,355) (145,208)
Financing Activities161,644
 24,401
 137,243
185,611
 41,842
 143,769
Net Increase (Decrease)$(5,047) $1,106
 $(6,153)$1,135
 $(2,277) $3,412
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period$26,989
 $25,883
  
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period$21,942
 $26,989
  
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash, Beginning of Period$22,916
 $25,193
  
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash, End of Period$24,051
 $22,916
  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 20162019 increased $26.7$11.6 million compared to the year ended December 31, 20152018 primarily as a result of moretiming differences in operating assets and liabilities, as well as increased net cash generatedoperating income from our operatingthe property portfolio, complimented by higher net cash generated from our construction business.portfolio.

Net cash used for investing activities for the year ended December 31, 20162019 increased $170.1$54.5 million compared to the year ended December 31, 20152018 primarily due to increased acquisition activity and development activity. Cash outflows for acquisitions totaled $195.6 million forincreased funding of mezzanine loans, which was partially offset by the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $68.4 million fordisposition of Lightfoot Marketplace and the year ended December 31, 2015.
Duringcollection of the year ended December 31, 2016, we invested $57.4 million in new real estate development compared to $52.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Decatur mezzanine loan receivable.
 
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 20162019 increased $137.2$61.3 million compared to the year ended December 31, 20152018 primarily as a result of increased net debt issuances and borrowings.the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock.
 
 Years Ended  
 December 31,   
 2015 2014 Change
 ($ in thousands)
Operating Activities$33,086
 $31,362
 $1,724
Investing Activities(56,381) (105,306) 48,925
Financing Activities24,401
 80,945
 (56,544)
Net Increase (Decrease)$1,106
 $7,001
 $(5,895)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period$25,883
 $18,882
  
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period$26,989
 $25,883
  
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $1.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily as a result of more net cash generated from our operating property portfolio, which was partially offset by less net cash generated from our construction business.
Net cash used for investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased $48.9 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 because of less cash spent on new real estate development. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we invested $52.7 million in new real estate development compared to $98.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2014.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased $56.5 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily as a result of less net debt issuances and borrowings.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures
 
FFO and Normalized FFO

We calculate FFO in accordance with the standards established by NAREIT. NAREITthe National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("Nareit"). Nareit defines FFO as net income (loss) (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating property, real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs), impairment of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
 
FFO is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because it believeswe believe that FFO is beneficial to investors as a starting point in measuring our operational performance. Specifically, in excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization and gains and losses from property dispositions, which do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, FFO provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year,year-over-year, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, and operating costs. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs, FFO will be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs.
 
However, because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. In addition, other equity REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the NAREITNareit definition as we do, and, accordingly, our calculation of FFO may not be comparable to such other REITs’ calculation of FFO. Accordingly, FFO should be considered only as a supplement to net income as a measure of our performance. FFO should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or service indebtedness. FFO also should not be used as a supplement to or substitute for cash flow from operating activities computed in accordance with GAAP.
 
We also believe that the computation of FFO in accordance with NAREIT’sNareit’s definition includes certain items that are not indicative of the results provided by the Company’sour operating property portfolio and affect the comparability of the Company’sour year-over-year performance. Accordingly, management believes that Normalized FFO is a more useful performance

measure that excludes certain items, including but not limited to, debt extinguishment losses and prepayment penalties, impairment of intangible assets and liabilities, property acquisition, development, and other pursuit costs, mark-to-market adjustments for interest rate

derivatives, amortization of right-of-use assets attributable to finance leases, severance related costs, and other non-comparable items.  
 
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of FFO and Normalized FFO for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2017 to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP equivalent:measure:  
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
 (in thousands, except per share and unit amounts)
Net income attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders$29,590
 $23,492
 $29,925
Depreciation and amortization (1)
53,616
 40,178
 37,321
Gain on operating real estate dispositions (2)
(3,220) (833) (7,595)
Impairment of real estate assets—
 1,502
 —
FFO attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders79,986
 64,339
 59,651
Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs844
 352
 648
Impairment of intangible assets and liabilities252
 117
 110
Loss on extinguishment of debt30
 11
 50
Amortization of right-of-use assets - finance leases377
 —
 —
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives3,599
 951
 (1,127)
Severance related costs—
 688
 —
Normalized FFO attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders$85,088
 $66,458
 $59,332
Net income attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders per diluted share and unit$0.41
 $0.36
 $0.50
FFO per diluted share and unit attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders$1.10
 $0.99
 $0.99
Normalized FFO per diluted share and unit attributable to common stockholders and OP Unit holders$1.17
 $1.03
 $0.99
Weighted average common shares and units - diluted72,644
 64,754
 60,181

 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
 ($ in thousands)
Net income$42,755
 $31,183
 $12,759
Depreciation and amortization35,328
 23,153
 17,569
Gain on real estate dispositions(30,103) (18,394) (2,211)
Funds from operations$47,980
 $35,942
 $28,117
Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs1,563
 1,935
 229
Impairment charges355
 41
 15
Loss on extinguishment of debt82
 512
 —
Derivative mark-to-market adjustments941
 229
 233
Normalized funds from operations$50,921
 $38,659
 $28,594
(1) The adjustment for depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 includes $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of depreciation attributable to the Company's investment in One City Center, which was an unconsolidated real estate investment until March 14, 2019. Additionally, the adjustment for depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2019 excludes $1.2 million of depreciation attributable to the Company's joint venture partners.
(2) The adjustment for gain on operating real estate dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2019 excludes the portion of the gain on Lightfoot Marketplace that was allocated to our joint venture partner and excludes the gain on sale of a non-operating land parcel. The adjustment for gain on operating real estate dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2018 excludes the gain on the River City industrial facility because this property was sold before being placed into service. Additionally, the adjustment for gain on operating real estate dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2017 excludes the gain on the land outparcel at Sandbridge Commons because this was a non-operating parcel.

The adjustment for gain on real estate dispositions for the year ended December 31, 2016 excludes the gain on the Newport News Economic Authority building because this building was sold before being placed in service.

Inflation
 
Substantially all of our office and retail leases provide for the recovery of increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses. In addition, substantially all of the leases provide for annual rent increases. We believe that inflationary increases may be offset in part by the contractual rent increases and expense escalations previously described. In addition, our multifamily leases generally have lease terms ranging from 7 to 15 months with a majority having 12-month lease terms allowing negotiation of rental rates at term end, which we believe reduces our exposure to the effects of inflation.


Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
 
The primary market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk. Our primary interest rate exposure is daily LIBOR. We primarily use fixed interest rate financing to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. On a limited basis, we also use derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. We do not use these derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes.
 

As of December 31, 20162019 and excluding unamortized GAAP adjustments, approximately $241.5$488.3 million, or 45.8%50.8%, of our debt had fixed interest rates or was subject to interest rate swaps and approximately $285.6$472.5 million, or 54.2%49.2%, had variable interest rates. Considering interest rate swaps approximately $15.6 millionand caps, 76.8% of our debt is subject to interest rate risk.either fixed-rate or economically hedged. As of December 31, 2019, LIBOR was approximately 176 basis points. Assuming no increasechange in the level of our variable ratevariable-rate debt or derivative instruments, if interest rates increasedwere to increase by 1.0%,100 basis points, our cash flow would decrease by approximately $1.5$4.1 million per year. As of December 31, 2016, LIBOR was approximately 77 basis points.year due to our interest rate derivatives. Assuming no increasechange in the level of our variable ratevariable-rate debt or derivative instruments, if LIBOR waswere reduced to 0by 100 basis points, our cash flow would increase by approximately $2.2$4.7 million per year.  


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
 
Our consolidated financial statements and supplementary data are included as a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on page F-1 and are incorporated herein by reference.


Item 9.Changes and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
 
None.
 

Item 9A.Controls9A.    Controls and Procedures.  
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
The Company’s management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of theWe maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in RulesRule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”"Exchange Act")), as required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effectiveare designed to ensure that information we are required to disclosebe disclosed in our reports filed or submitted withunder the Securities and Exchange Commission (i)Act is processed, recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securitiesrules and regulations of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.    

We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, as of December 31, 2019, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Commission’sAct (i) is processed, recorded, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) ofunder the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162019 based on the 2013 framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)(2013 framework). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2019.  
 
Attestation ReportOur internal control over financial reporting as of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDecember 31, 2019 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included elsewhere herein.
Not applicable.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) ofunder the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 20162019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.



Item 9B.Other Information.  
 
None.



PART III  


Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
 
This information is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than May 1, 2017.April 29, 2020.  


Item 11.Executive Compensation.  
 
This information is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than May 1, 2017.April 29, 2020. 


Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. 
 
This information is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than May 1, 2017.April 29, 2020. 



Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
 
This information is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than May 1, 2017.April 29, 2020. 
 
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
 
This information is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement with respect to the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC no later than May 1, 2017.April 29, 2020. 



PART IV  


Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.  
 
The following is a list of documents filed as a part of this report:


(1)Financial Statements
 
Included herein at pages F-1 through F-40.F-49.  
 
(2)Financial Statement Schedules
 
The following financial statement schedule is included herein at pages F-41F-50 through F-43:F-52:  
 
Schedule III—Consolidated Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation
 
All other schedules for which provision is made in Regulation S-X are either not required to be included herein under the related instructions, are inapplicable, or the related information is included in the footnotes to the applicable financial statements and, therefore, have been omitted.
 
(3)Exhibits
 
The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index.Index to Exhibits of this report and incorporated by reference herein.


Item 16.Form 10-K Summary.  


None.


INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on June 2, 2014)
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 23, 2018)
3.3
Articles Supplementary Designating the Rights and Preferences of the 6.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 17, 2019).
3.4
Articles Supplementary relating to Section 3-802(c) of the Maryland General Corporation Law (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 24, 2020).
4.1
Form of Certificate of Common Stock of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
4.2*
Description of Securities of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
10.1
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Armada Hoffler, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2013)
10.2†
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on June 15, 2017)
10.3†*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Executive officers.
10.4†
Indemnification Agreement between Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and each of the Directors and Officers listed on Schedule A thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 6, 2019)
10.5†
Tax Protection Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and the person listed on the signature page thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2013)
10.6†*
Armada Hoffler, L.P. Amended and Restated Executive Severance Benefit Plan with the participants listed on Schedule A thereto.
10.7*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors.
10.8
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 19, 2014, to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Armada Hoffler, L.P., dated as of May 13, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 15, 2014)
10.9
Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 10, 2015, to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Armada Hoffler, L.P., dated as of May 13, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015)
10.10†

Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. Amended and Restated Short-Term Incentive Program. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 28, 2019)
10.11
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated October 3, 2019, among Armada Hoffler, L.P., as Borrower, Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., as Parent, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the other agents and Lenders party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 9, 2019)
10.12
Second Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated October 3, 2019, among certain subsidiaries of Armada Hoffler, L.P. named therein for the benefit of the Administrative Agent and the Lenders named in the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 9, 2019)
10.13
Amendment No. 3 to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 17, 2019).
21.1*
List of Subsidiaries of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.

Exhibit
Number
Description
23.1*
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Public Accounting Firm
31.1*
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2**
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101*The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, were formatted in Inline XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
104*Cover page Interactive Data File - the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL.
*Filed herewith
**Furnished herewith
†Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date: March 1, 2017February 24, 2020 
 
ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
  
By:/s/ Louis S. Haddad
 Louis S. Haddad
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
Signature    Title    Date
     
/s/ Daniel A. Hoffler Executive Chairman and Director March 1, 2017February 24, 2020
Daniel A. Hoffler
/s/ A. Russell KirkVice Chairman and DirectorMarch 1, 2017
A. Russell Kirk    
     
/s/ Louis S. Haddad Vice Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director March 1, 2017February 24, 2020
Louis S. Haddad (principal executive officer)  
     
/s/ Michael P. O’Hara Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and TreasurerSecretary March 1, 2017February 24, 2020
Michael P. O’Hara (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)  
     
/s/ George F. Allen Director March 1, 2017February 24, 2020
George F. Allen    
     
/s/ James A. Carroll Director March 1, 2017February 24, 2020
James A. Carroll    
     
/s/ James C. Cherry Director March 1, 2017February 24, 2020
James C. Cherry    
     
/s/ Eva S. Hardy Director March 1, 2017February 24, 2020
Eva S. Hardy
/s/ A. Russell KirkDirectorFebruary 24, 2020
A. Russell Kirk
/s/ Dorothy S. McAuliffeDirectorFebruary 24, 2020
Dorothy S. McAuliffe    
     
/s/ John W. Snow Director March 1, 2017February 24, 2020
John W. Snow    

Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
 
Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20162019 
 
Item 8, Item 15(a)(1) and (2)
 
Index to Financial Statements and Schedule
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015 2018
F-3F-6
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018, and 2014 2017
F-4F-7
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018, and 20142017
F-5F-8
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018, and 20142017
F-6F-9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
F-7F-10
Schedule III—Consolidated Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation 
F-41F-50


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.


Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 2019 consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated February 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tysons, Virginia
February 24, 2020

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
 Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (the “Company”),Company) as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015, and2018, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included2019, and the financial statement schedulerelated notes and Financial Statement Schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). TheseIn our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and schedule arepresent fairly, in all material respects, the responsibilityfinancial position of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statementsCompany at December 31, 2019 and schedule based on our audits.
2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We conducted our auditsalso have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Adoption of ASU No. 2016-02
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for leases in 2019 due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), and the related amendments.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engagedmisstatement, whether due to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.error or fraud. Our audits included considerationperforming procedures to assess the risks of internal control overmaterial misstatement of the financial reporting as a basis for designing auditstatements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includesrespond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
In our opinion,
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements referredthat were communicated or required to above present fairly,be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, inany way our opinion on the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basicconsolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respectsand we are not, by communicating the information set forth therein.critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method for determining whether it acquired or sold a business as a result of the adoption of the amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification resulting from Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” effective October 1, 2016.
Allowance for Loan Losses - Notes Receivable
Description of the Matter
/s/ Ernst & Young LLPAt December 31, 2019, the Company’s notes receivable portfolio totaled $159.4 million. As discussed in Notes 2 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, management estimates the allowance for loan losses on outstanding notes receivable based primarily upon the value of the underlying development project. For loans determined to be impaired, the Company recognizes impairment losses calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of the loan and its estimated realizable value. The calculation of the estimated realizable value includes an estimation of the projected sales proceeds from the sale of the underlying development property.


Auditing management’s estimate of the allowance for loan losses was complex and highly judgmental due to the significant estimation required to determine the estimated realizable value of each loan. In particular, the estimated realizable value of each loan was largely dependent on the estimated fair value of the underlying development property, which was highly sensitive to significant assumptions based on management’s expectations about future real estate market or economic conditions and the projected operating results of the property.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the allowance for loan losses process. For example, we tested controls over management’s review of the estimated allowance, the significant assumptions, and the data used to calculate the estimated realizable values of loans.

To test the allowance for loan losses, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing methodologies used and testing the significant assumptions and underlying data used by the Company in calculating the estimated realizable values of loans. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to external evidence, including comparable market capitalization rates and recent appraisals of the subject property. We tested the projected operating results of subject properties by comparing inputs and assumptions to executed or draft lease agreements and operating expenses incurred at similar operating properties owned by the Company. We performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes to the estimated realizable value of each loan that would result from changes in the assumptions. We also assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates.
General contracting revenue recognition
Description of the Matter
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s general contracting revenues totaled approximately $105.9 million. As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, for each construction contract, the Company estimates its progress in satisfying performance obligations based on the proportion of incurred costs to total estimated costs at completion. The Company also estimates the total transaction price, including variable components, for each construction contract.

Auditing the Company’s measurement of general contracting revenue was challenging due to the significant estimation required to determine the estimated total costs at completion and variable consideration. Estimated costs at completion are affected by management’s forecasts of anticipated costs to be incurred and contingency reserves for exposures related to unknown costs, such as design deficiencies and subcontractor defaults. Estimated variable consideration is affected by claims and unapproved change orders, which may result from changes in the scope of the contract.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over the measurement of general contracting revenue. For example, we tested controls over management’s review and monitoring of the variable consideration calculation and the underlying assumptions related to estimates of costs at completion.

To test general contracting revenue recognition, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the estimates discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company to calculate variable consideration and total estimated costs at completion. For example, we tested variable consideration by inspecting subsequently executed change orders, reviewing legally enforceable terms of the contracts or confirming the value of executed change orders directly with the customers. We also confirmed directly with customers specific contract details, including the current and original contract value as well as the estimated percentage of completion. We tested the estimated costs at completion by comparing management’s cost estimates of materials, labor, and subcontractors to third-party evidence, such as subcontractor bids. In addition, we visited development sites, conducted interviews with the Company’s project management personnel, and involved our engineering specialists to assist in testing the Company’s estimated costs at completion. We also assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates of variable consideration and estimated costs at completion through retrospective review of actual gross-margins of completed projects compared to the anticipated gross margins during the projects.


McLean,
Accounting for Acquisition of Operating Properties
Description of the Matter
During 2019, the Company completed a series of six operating property acquisitions for a total purchase price of $361.1 million as described in Notes 2 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements. These transactions were accounted for as asset acquisitions.

Auditing the Company's accounting for these acquisitions was challenging due to the significant estimation required by management to determine the fair values of the acquired assets used to allocate costs of the acquisitions on a relative fair value basis. The significant estimation was primarily due to the sensitivity of the respective fair values to underlying assumptions. The significant assumptions used to estimate the values of the tangible and intangible assets included the replacement cost of the properties, total lease-up time and lost rental revenues during such time, market rents, estimated future cash flows and other valuation assumptions.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s acquisition and purchase price allocation process, including controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions described above. For example, we tested controls over management’s review of the valuation methodology, the purchase price allocation, and the significant assumptions used.

To test the costs allocated to the tangible and intangible assets, we involved our valuation specialists and performed audit procedures that included, among others, evaluating the Company’s valuation methodologies, testing the significant assumptions described above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data. For example, we compared the significant assumptions to observable market data, including other properties within the same submarkets and to historical costs incurred by the Company in developing and constructing similar assets. We also performed sensitivity analyses of the significant assumptions to evaluate the change in fair values resulting from the changes in assumptions. In addition, we compared the Company’s estimated fair values of acquired assets to independent estimates developed by our valuation specialist.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2012.
Tysons, Virginia
March 1, 2017 February 24, 2020




ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except par value and share data)
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
2016 20152019 2018
ASSETS      
Real estate investments:      
Income producing property$894,078
 $579,000
$1,460,723
 $1,037,917
Held for development680
 1,180
5,000
 2,994
Construction in progress13,529
 53,411
140,601
 135,675
908,287
 633,591
1,606,324
 1,176,586
Accumulated depreciation(139,553) (125,380)(224,738) (188,775)
Net real estate investments768,734
 508,211
1,381,586
 987,811
Real estate investments held for sale—
 40,232
1,460
 929
Cash and cash equivalents21,942
 26,989
39,232
 21,254
Restricted cash3,251
 2,824
4,347
 2,797
Accounts receivable, net15,052
 21,982
23,470
 19,016
Notes receivable59,546
 7,825
159,371
 138,683
Construction receivables, including retentions39,433
 36,535
36,361
 16,154
Construction contract costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings110
 88
249
 1,358
Equity method investments10,235
 1,411
—
 22,203
Operating lease right-of-use assets33,088
 —
Finance lease right-of-use assets24,130
 —
Acquired lease intangible assets, net68,702
 27,561
Other assets64,165
 43,450
32,901
 27,616
Total Assets$982,468
 $689,547
$1,804,897
 $1,265,382
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY      
Indebtedness, net$522,180
 $377,593
$950,537
 $694,239
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities10,804
 6,472
17,803
 15,217
Construction payables, including retentions51,130
 52,067
53,382
 50,796
Billings in excess of construction contract costs and estimated earnings10,167
 2,224
5,306
 3,037
Operating lease liabilities41,474
 —
Finance lease liabilities17,903
 —
Other liabilities39,209
 25,471
63,045
 46,203
Total Liabilities633,490
 463,827
1,149,450
 809,492
Stockholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively—
 —
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 37,490,361 and 30,076,359 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively374
 300
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 6.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, 2,530,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and zero shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 201863,250
 —
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 56,277,971 and 50,013,731 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively563
 500
Additional paid-in capital197,114
 102,906
455,680
 357,353
Distributions in excess of earnings(49,345) (53,010)(106,676) (82,699)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss—
 (648)(4,240) (1,283)
Total stockholders’ equity148,143
 49,548
408,577
 273,871
Noncontrolling interests200,835
 176,172
Noncontrolling interests in investment entities4,462
 —
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership242,408
 182,019
Total Equity348,978
 225,720
655,447
 455,890
Total Liabilities and Equity$982,468
 $689,547
$1,804,897
 $1,265,382

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Consolidated Statements ofComprehensiveIncome  
(In thousands, except per shareand unitdata)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Revenues                            
Rental revenues$99,355
 $81,172
 $64,746
$151,339
 $116,958
 $108,737
General contracting and real estate services revenues159,030
 171,268
 103,321
105,859
 76,359
 194,034
Total revenues258,385
 252,440
 168,067
257,198
 193,317
 302,771
Expenses          
Rental expenses21,904
 19,204
 16,667
34,332
 27,222
 25,422
Real estate taxes9,629
 7,782
 5,743
14,961
 11,383
 10,528
General contracting and real estate services expenses153,375
 165,344
 98,754
101,538
 73,628
 186,590
Depreciation and amortization35,328
 23,153
 17,569
54,564
 39,913
 37,321
Amortization of right-of-use assets - finance leases377
 —
 —
General and administrative expenses9,552
 8,397
 7,711
12,392
 11,431
 10,435
Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs1,563
 1,935
 229
844
 352
 648
Impairment charges355
 41
 15
252
 1,619
 110
Total expenses231,706
 225,856
 146,688
219,260
 165,548
 271,054
Gain on real estate dispositions4,699
 4,254
 8,087
Operating income26,679
 26,584
 21,379
42,637
 32,023
 39,804
Interest income3,228
 126
 —
23,215
 10,729
 7,077
Interest expense(16,466) (13,333) (10,648)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(82) (512) —
Gain on real estate dispositions30,533
 18,394
 2,211
Interest expense on indebtedness(30,776) (19,087) (17,439)
Interest expense on finance leases(568) —
 —
Equity in income of unconsolidated real estate entities273
 372
 —
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives(941) (229) (233)(3,599) (951) 1,127
Other income147
 119
 120
Other income (expense), net585
 377
 81
Income before taxes43,098
 31,149
 12,829
31,767
 23,463
 30,650
Income tax benefit (provision)(343) 34
 (70)491
 29
 (725)
Net income42,755
 31,183
 12,759
32,258
 23,492
 29,925
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(14,681) (11,541) (5,068)
Net income attributable to stockholders$28,074
 $19,642
 $7,691
Net income per share and unit:     
Basic and diluted$0.85
 $0.75
 $0.36
Weighted-average outstanding:     
Common shares33,057
 26,006
 20,946
Common units17,167
 15,377
 14,125
Basic and diluted50,224
 41,383
 35,071
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests:     
Investment entities(213) —
 —
Operating Partnership(7,992) (6,289) (8,878)
Net income attributable to Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.24,053
 17,203
 21,047
Preferred stock dividends(2,455) —
 —
Net income attributable to common stockholders$21,598
 $17,203
 $21,047
Net income attributable to common stockholders per share (basic and diluted)$0.41
 $0.36
 $0.50
Weighted-average Common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)53,119
 47,512
 42,423
     
Comprehensive income: 
  
  
 
    
Net income$42,755
 $31,183
 $12,759
$32,258
 $23,492
 $29,925
Unrealized cash flow hedge losses—
 (1,075) —
(4,504) (1,894) —
Realized cash flow hedge losses reclassified to net income—
 27
 —
501
 169
 —
Comprehensive income42,755
 30,135
 12,759
28,255
 21,767
 29,925
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(14,681) (11,141) (5,068)     
Comprehensive income attributable to stockholders$28,074
 $18,994
 $7,691
Investment entities(213) —
 —
Operating Partnership(6,946) (5,847) (8,878)
Comprehensive income attributable to Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.$21,096
 $15,920
 $21,047

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Equity  
(In thousands, except share data)
 
Shares of
common
stock
 
Common
stock
 
Additional
paid-
in capital
 
Distributions
in excess of
earnings
 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
 
Total
stockholders’
equity (deficit)
 
Noncontrolling
interests
 
Total
Equity
Balance, January 1, 201419,163,413
 $192
 $1,247
 $(47,934) $—
 $(46,495) $152,016
 $105,521
Net income—
 —
 —
 7,691
 —
 7,691
 5,068
 12,759
Net proceeds from sale of common stock5,750,000
 57
 49,242
 —
 —
 49,299
 —
 49,299
Restricted stock awards109,288
 1
 1,284
 —
 —
 1,285
 —
 1,285
Acquisitions of real estate investments—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 16,351
 16,351
Exchange of owners’ equity for common units—
 —
 (301) —
 —
 (301) 301
 —
Dividends and distributions declared—
 —
 —
 (14,170) —
 (14,170) (9,139) (23,309)
Balance, December 31, 201425,022,701
 $250
 $51,472
 $(54,413) $—
 $(2,691) $164,597
 $161,906
Net income—
 —
 —
 19,642
 —
 19,642
 11,541
 31,183
Unrealized cash flow hedge losses—
 —
 —
 —
 (665) (665) (410) (1,075)
Realized cash flow hedge losses reclassified to net income—
 —
 —
 —
 17
 17
 10
 27
Net proceeds from sale of common stock4,560,049
 45
 45,990
 —
 —
 46,035
 —
 46,035
Restricted stock awards78,109
 1
 992
 —
 —
 993
 —
 993
Acquisitions of real estate investments415,500
 4
 4,429
 —
 —
 4,433
 10,736
 15,169
Exchange of owners’ equity for common units—
 —
 23
 —
 —
 23
 (264) (241)
Dividends and distributions declared—
 —
 —
 (18,239) —
 (18,239) (10,038) (28,277)
Balance, December 31, 201530,076,359
 $300
 $102,906
 $(53,010) $(648) $49,548
 $176,172
 $225,720
Net income—
 —
 —
 28,074
 —
 28,074
 14,681
 42,755
Dedesignation of cash flow hedge—
 —
 —
 —
 648
 648
 400
 1,048
Net proceeds from sales of common stock5,312,855
 53
 66,969
 —
 —
 67,022
 —
 67,022
Restricted stock awards101,147
 1
 1,161
 —
 —
 1,162
 —
 1,162
Acquisitions of real estate investments2,000,000
 20
 26,080
 —
 —
 26,100
 21,178
 47,278
Redemption of operating partnership units—
 —
 (2) —
 —
 (2) (56) (58)
Dividends and distributions declared—
 —
 —
 (24,409) —
 (24,409) (11,540) (35,949)
Balance, December 31, 201637,490,361
 $374
 $197,114
 $(49,345) $—
 $148,143
 $200,835
 $348,978
 Preferred stock Common stock Additional paid-in capital Distributions in excess of earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Total stockholders' equity (deficit) Noncontrolling interests in investment entities Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership Total equity
Balance, January 1, 2017$—
 $374
 $197,114
 $(49,345) $—
 $148,143
 $—
 $200,835
 $348,978
Net income—
 —
 —
 21,047
 —
 21,047
 —
 8,878
 29,925
Net proceeds from sales of common stock—
 74
 91,307
 —
 —
 91,381
 —
 —
 91,381
Restricted stock awards, net of tax withholding—
 1
 1,442
 —
 —
 1,443
 —
 —
 1,443
Restricted stock award forfeitures—
 —
 (2) —
 —
 (2) —
 —
 (2)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests in real estate investments—
 —
 (1,493) —
 —
 (1,493) —
 982
 (511)
Redemption of operating partnership units—
 —
 (961) —
 —
 (961) —
 (4,194) (5,155)
Dividends and distributions declared—
 —
 —
 (32,868) —
 (32,868) —
 (12,908) (45,776)
Balance, December 31, 2017—
 449
 287,407
 (61,166) —
 226,690
 —
 193,593
 420,283
Net income—
 —
 —
 17,203
 —
 17,203
 —
 6,289
 23,492
Unrealized cash flow hedge losses—
 —
 —
 —
 (1,410) (1,410) —
 (484) (1,894)
Realized cash flow hedge losses reclassified to net income—
 —
 —
 —
 127
 127
 —
 42
 169
Net proceeds from sales of common stock—
 46
 65,198
 —
 —
 65,244
 —
 —
 65,244
Restricted stock awards, net of tax withholding—
 2
 1,562
 —
 —
 1,564
 —
 —
 1,564
Restricted stock award forfeitures—
 —
 (32) —
 —
 (32) —
 —
 (32)
Issuance of operating partnership units for acquisitions—
 —
 (5) —
 —
 (5) —
 2,201
 2,196
Redemption of operating partnership units—
 3
 3,223
 —
 —
 3,226
 —
 (5,821) (2,595)
Dividends and distributions declared—
 —
 —
 (38,736) —
 (38,736) —
 (13,801) (52,537)
Balance, December 31, 2018—
 500
 357,353
 (82,699) (1,283) 273,871
 —
 182,019
 455,890
Cumulative effect of accounting change (1)
—
 —
 —
 (125) —
 (125) —
 (42) (167)
Net income—
 —
 —
 24,053
 —
 24,053
 213
 7,992
 32,258
Unrealized cash flow hedge losses—
 —
 —
 —
 (3,321) (3,321) —
 (1,183) (4,504)
Realized cash flow hedge losses reclassified to net income—
 —
 —
 —
 364
 364
 —
 137
 501
Net proceeds from issuance of cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock63,250
 —
 (2,249) —
 —
 61,001
 —
 —
 61,001
Net proceeds from sales of common stock—
 59
 96,786
 —
 —
 96,845
 —
 —
 96,845
Restricted stock awards, net of tax withholding—
 2
 2,029
 —
 —
 2,031
 —
 —
 2,031
Noncontrolling interest in acquired real estate entity—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 4,870
 —
 4,870
Restricted stock award forfeitures—
 —
 (7) —
 —
 (7) —
 —
 (7)
Issuance of operating partnership units for acquisitions—
 —
 (986) —
 —
 (986) —
 73,169
 72,183
Redemption of operating partnership units—
 2
 2,754
 —
 —
 2,756
 —
 (2,756) —
Distributions to Joint Venture Partners—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 (621) —
 (621)
Dividends and distributions declared on preferred stock      (2,455)   (2,455) —
 —
 (2,455)
Dividends and distributions declared on common shares and units—
 —
 —
 (45,450) —
 (45,450) —
 (16,928) (62,378)
Balance, December 31, 2019$63,250
 $563
 $455,680
 $(106,676) $(4,240) $408,577
 $4,462
 $242,408
 $655,447

(1) The Company recorded cumulative effect adjustments related to the new lease standard in the first quarter of 2019. See "Financial Statements — Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies — Recent Accounting Pronouncements” for additional information.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  
(In thousands)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
OPERATING ACTIVITIES                            
Net income$42,755
 $31,183
 $12,759
$32,258
 $23,492
 $29,925
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Depreciation of buildings and tenant improvements23,453
 18,678
 14,984
37,839
 30,395
 25,974
Amortization of leasing costs and in-place lease intangibles11,875
 4,475
 2,585
Amortization of leasing costs, in-place lease intangibles and below market ground rents - operating leases16,725
 9,518
 11,347
Accrued straight-line rental revenue(1,091) (1,924) (2,203)(3,402) (2,731) (1,222)
Amortization of leasing incentives and above or below-market rents(85) 738
 632
(629) (266) (195)
Amortization of right-of-use assets - finance leases377
 —
 —
Accrued straight-line ground rent expense371
 290
 315
(16) 214
 530
Bad debt expense203
 131
 79
Adjustment for uncollectable accounts511
 419
 564
Noncash stock compensation1,082
 931
 917
1,613
 1,281
 1,323
Impairment charges355
 41
 15
252
 1,619
 110
Noncash interest expense980
 1,006
 517
1,258
 1,116
 1,274
Loss on extinguishment of debt82
 512
 —
Interest expense on finance leases568
 —
 —
Gain on real estate dispositions(30,533) (18,394) (2,211)(4,699) (4,254) (8,087)
Adjustment for Annapolis Junction modification fee (1)
(4,489) 4,489
 —
Change in the fair value of interest rate derivatives941
 229
 233
3,599
 951
 (1,127)
Other noncash gain—
 —
 (42)
Equity in income of unconsolidated real estate entities(273) (372) —
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
Property assets(3,183) (2,463) (1,420)(2,499) (3,539) (2,415)
Property liabilities3,761
 2,326
 (1,069)3,368
 1,720
 2,843
Construction assets(6,385) (17,337) (5,893)(20,356) 7,554
 17,573
Construction liabilities15,189
 12,664
 11,164
18,671
 (15,248) (20,110)
Interest receivable(12,947) (271) (7,071)
Net cash provided by operating activities59,770
 33,086
 31,362
67,729
 56,087
 51,236
INVESTING ACTIVITIES          
Development of real estate investments(57,425) (52,719) (98,467)(133,445) (133,791) (45,730)
Tenant and building improvements(6,698) (5,157) (6,362)(19,721) (11,723) (12,252)
Acquisitions of real estate investments(195,645) (68,445) (2,754)
Dispositions of real estate investments96,670
 79,566
 7,387
Acquisitions of real estate investments, net of cash received(138,380) (57,544) (30,026)
Dispositions of real estate investments, net of selling costs32,944
 34,673
 12,557
Notes receivable issuances(51,721) (7,825) —
(54,555) (58,208) (16,219)
Government development grants—
 300
 300
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash(208) 1,580
 (1,824)
Notes receivable paydowns22,522
 1,165
 —
Leasing costs(2,374) (2,118) (2,835)(3,893) (4,607) (2,235)
Leasing incentives(236) (1,563) (751)—
 (108) (274)
Contributions to real estate joint ventures(8,824) —
 —
Contributions to equity method investments(535) (10,420) (1,176)
Net cash used for investing activities(226,461) (56,381) (105,306)(295,063) (240,563) (95,355)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES          
Proceeds from sales of common stock68,475
 46,462
 49,566
Offering costs(1,453) (427) (416)
Proceeds from issuance of cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock, net61,001
 —
 —
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net96,845
 65,244
 91,381
Common shares tendered for tax withholding(369) (409) (289)
Debt issuances, credit facility and construction loan borrowings316,852
 214,407
 117,645
427,286
 349,580
 162,585
Debt and credit facility repayments, including principal amortization(186,533) (206,889) (63,306)(270,851) (173,855) (160,661)
Debt issuance costs(1,796) (1,887) (448)(5,546) (1,457) (2,403)
Redemption of operating partnership units(58) (241) —
—
 (2,595) (5,155)
Dividends and distributions(33,843) (27,024) (22,096)(61,504) (50,897) (43,616)
Net cash provided by financing activities161,644
 24,401
 80,945
246,862
 185,611
 41,842
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(5,047) 1,106
 7,001
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period26,989
 25,883
 18,882
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$21,942
 $26,989
 $25,883
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Cash paid for interest$(15,326) $(12,993) $(12,132)
Cash refunded (paid) for income taxes$(121) $276
 $(821)
Common shares and OP units issued for acquisitions$47,278
 $15,169
 $16,351
Change in accrued capital improvements and development costs$8,183
 $1,825
 $2,608
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash19,528
 1,135
 (2,277)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period (2)
24,051
 22,916
 25,193
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period (2)
$43,579
 $24,051
 $22,916
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued) 
(In thousands)
 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Cash paid for interest$28,878
 $(17,319) $(16,318)
Cash refunded (paid) for income taxes247
 31
 (371)
Increase in dividends payable3,950
 1,640
 2,160
Common shares and OP units issued for acquisitions (3)
73,169
 1,702
 506
(Decrease) increase in accrued capital improvements and development costs(12,666) 18,310
 10,899
Operating Partnership units redeemed for common shares2,756
 3,715
 —
Debt principal extinguished in conjunction with real estate sales—
 —
 5,594
Debt assumed at fair value in conjunction with real estate purchases101,390
 —
 —
Redeemable noncontrolling interest from development—
 —
 2,000
Deferred payment for land acquisition—
 —
 600
Note receivable extinguished in conjunction with real estate purchase31,252
 —
 —
Equity method investment redeemed for real estate acquisition23,011
 —
 —
Noncontrolling interest in acquired real estate entity4,870
 —
 —
Recognition of operating lease ROU assets (4)
33,965
 —
 —
Recognition of operating lease liabilities (4)
41,631
 —
 —
Recognition of finance lease ROU assets24,500
 —
 —
Recognition of finance lease liabilities17,871
 —
 —
De-recognition of operating lease ROU assets - lease termination440
 —
 —
De-recognition of operating lease liabilities - lease termination440
 —
 —


(1) Borrower paid $5.0 million in 2018 in exchange for the Company's purchase option. This was accounted for as a loan modification fee; interest income was recognized as additional interest income on the note receivable over the one-year remaining term.

(2) The following table sets forth the items from the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets that are included in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows:
 As of December 31,
 2019 2018
Cash and cash equivalents$39,232
 $21,254
Restricted cash (a)
4,347
 2,797
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$43,579
 $24,051

(a) Restricted cash represents amounts held by lenders for real estate taxes, insurance, and reserves for capital improvements.

(3) 2017 issuance consists of OP Units contingently issuable upon the satisfaction of certain conditions relating to the Johns Hopkins Village property. These OP Units were issued in 2018.

(4) Net of $0.4 million disposal related to the Company's preexisting lease at the Thames Street Wharf property, which was acquired on June 26, 2019.


See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  
 
1.Business and Organization
 
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (the “Company”"Company") is a full service real estate company with extensive experience developing, building, owning, and managing high-quality, institutional-grade office, retail, and multifamily properties in attractive markets primarily throughout the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern United States.
 
The Company is a real estate investment trust or REIT, and is("REIT"), the sole general partner of Armada Hoffler, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”"Operating Partnership"), and as of December 31, 2016,2019, owned 68.1%72.6% of the economic interest in the Operating Partnership, of which 0.1% is held as general partnership units. The operations of the Company are carried on primarily through the Operating Partnership and the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. Both the Company and the Operating Partnership were formed on October 12, 2012 and commenced operations upon completion of the underwritten initial public offering of shares of the Company’s common stock (the “IPO”"IPO") and certain related formation transactions on May 13, 2013.
��

 



As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company owned 100% of the interests in eachCompany's operating portfolio consisted of the following properties in its operating property portfolio:properties:  
Property    Segment LocationOwnership Interest
4525 Main Street Office Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Armada Hoffler Tower Office Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Commonwealth of Virginia – ChesapeakeBrooks Crossing Office Office Chesapeake,Newport News, Virginia100%
Commonwealth of Virginia – Virginia BeachOne City Center Office Virginia Beach, VirginiaDurham, North Carolina100%
One Columbus Office Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Thames Street WharfOfficeBaltimore, Maryland100%
Two Columbus Office Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
249 Central Park Retail Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Alexander Pointe Retail Salisbury, North Carolina100%
Apex Entertainment (1)
RetailVirginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Bermuda Crossroads Retail Chester, Virginia100%
Broad Creek Shopping Center Retail Norfolk, Virginia100%
Broadmoor Plaza Retail South Bend, Indiana100%
Brooks Crossing Retail (2)
RetailNewport News, Virginia65%
Columbus Village Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Columbus Village II Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Commerce Street Retail Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Courthouse 7-Eleven Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia
Dick’s at Town Center RetailVirginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Dimmock Square Retail Colonial Heights, Virginia100%
Fountain Plaza Retail Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Gainsborough Square Retail Chesapeake, Virginia100%
Greentree Shopping Center Retail Chesapeake, Virginia100%
Hanbury Village Retail Chesapeake, Virginia100%
Harper Hill Commons Retail Winston-Salem, North Carolina100%
Harrisonburg Regal Retail Harrisonburg, Virginia100%
Indian Lakes CrossingRetailVirginia Beach, Virginia100%
Lexington SquareRetailLexington, South Carolina100%
Market at Mill Creek (2)
RetailMount Pleasant, South Carolina70%
Marketplace at HilltopRetailVirginia Beach, Virginia100%
North Hampton Market Retail Taylors, South Carolina100%

PropertySegmentLocationOwnership Interest
North Point Center Retail Durham, North Carolina100%
Oakland Marketplace Retail Oakland, Tennessee100%
Parkway CentreRetailMoultrie, Georgia100%
Parkway Marketplace Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia100%
Patterson Place Retail Durham, North Carolina100%
Perry Hall Marketplace Retail Perry Hall, Maryland100%
Providence Plaza Retail Charlotte, North Carolina100%
Red Mill CommonsRetailVirginia Beach, Virginia100%
Renaissance Square Retail Davidson, North Carolina100%
Sandbridge Commons Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia100%
Socastee Commons Retail Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Southgate Square RetailColonial Heights, Virginia
Southshore ShopsRetailChesterfield, Virginia100%
South Retail Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
South Square Retail Durham, North Carolina100%
Southgate SquareRetailColonial Heights, Virginia100%
Southshore ShopsRetailChesterfield, Virginia100%
Stone House Square Retail Hagerstown, Maryland100%
Studio 56 Retail Retail Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Tyre Neck Harris Teeter Retail Portsmouth, Virginia
Waynesboro Commons RetailWaynesboro, Virginia100%
Wendover Village Retail Greensboro, North Carolina100%
1405 PointMultifamilyBaltimore, Maryland79%
Encore Apartments Multifamily Virginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Greenside ApartmentsMultifamilyCharlotte, North Carolina100%
Hoffler PlaceMultifamilyCharleston, South Carolina93%
Johns Hopkins VillageMultifamilyBaltimore, Maryland100%
Liberty Apartments Multifamily Newport News, Virginia100%
Premier ApartmentsMultifamilyVirginia Beach, Virginia*100%
Smith’s Landing Multifamily Blacksburg, Virginia
The Cosmopolitan MultifamilyVirginia Beach, Virginia*100%

________________________________________
* Located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach
(1) Dick's Sporting Goods, one of the anchor tenants at the property previously known as "Dick’s at Town Center," notified the Company during 2019 that it would not renew its lease beyond January 31, 2020, the end of the current term. In October 2019, the Company signed a lease with a replacement tenant, Apex Entertainment, which will take the entire space currently occupied by Dick's Sporting Goods after the redevelopment and buildout of the facility is completed, which is expected to occur by the end of 2020.

(2) The Company is entitled to a preferred return on its investment in this property.
As of December 31, 2016,2019, the following properties were under development, redevelopment or construction:not yet stabilized:
Property    Segment    Location Ownership Interest
Brooks CrossingWills Wharf Office/RetailNewport News, Virginia65%
Johns Hopkins VillageMultifamilyOffice Baltimore, Maryland 80100%
(1)
Lightfoot MarketplacePremier Retail Retail Williamsburg, Virginia Beach, Virginia* 70100%
Summit Place MultifamilyCharleston, South Carolina90%
Town Center Phase VIThe Cosmopolitan Multifamily Virginia Beach, Virginia* 80100%
Harding PlaceMultifamilyCharlotte, North Carolina80%
(1)The noncontrolling interest holder of Johns Hopkins Village has the right to exchange its 20% ownership interest for Class A units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“Class A Units”) upon and for a period of one year after the project’s completion.  The Company is entitled to a preferred return of 9% on its investment in Johns Hopkins Village.


*Located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach



2.Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”("GAAP").
 
The consolidated financial statements include the financial position and results of operations of the Company, the Operating Partnership, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and any interests in variable interest entities ("VIEs") where the Company has been determined to be the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed. Such estimates are based on management’s historical experience and best judgment after considering past, current, and expected events and economic conditions. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates.
 
Segments
 
Segment information is prepared on the same basis that management reviews information for operational decision-making purposes. Management evaluates the performance of each of the Company’s properties individually and aggregates such properties into segments based on their economic characteristics and classes of tenants. The Company operates in four4 business segments: (i) office real estate, (ii) retail real estate, (iii) multifamily residential real estate, and (iv) general contracting and real estate services. The Company’s general contracting and real estate services business develops and builds properties for its own account and also provides construction and development services to both related and third parties.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts previously reported in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

The Company revised the presentation of its consolidated Balance Sheet for all reporting periods by reclassifying
"Acquired intangible lease assets" as a separate line item. As a result, the Company no longer includes acquired intangible lease assets as part of "Other assets". The Company also revised the presentation in its consolidated statement of cash flows for all reporting periods by reclassifying offering cost charges on its common stock issuance and including the charges with "Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net" line item. This presentation change had no other impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements or any other operating measure for the periods affected.

Revenue Recognition
 
Rental Revenues
 
The Company leases its properties under operating leases and recognizes base rents when earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Rental revenues include $1.1$3.4 million, $1.9$2.7 million and $2.2$1.2 million of straight-line rent adjustments for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016.2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The Company begins recognizing rental revenue when the tenant has the right to take possession of or controls the physical use of the property under lease. The extended collection period for accrued straight-line rental revenue along with the Company’s evaluation of tenant credit risk may result in the nonrecognition of all or a portion of straight-line rental revenue until the collection of substantially all such revenue for a tenant is reasonably assured.probable. The Company recognizes contingent rental revenue (e.g., percentage rents based on tenant sales thresholds) when the sales thresholds are met. Contingent rents included in rental revenues were $0.1

$0.3 million, $0.3 million, and $0.4 million for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016.2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The Company recognizes leasing incentives as reductions to rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Leasing incentive amortization was $0.7 million, $0.7 million, and $0.8 million for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016 was $0.8 million, $0.8 million2019, 2018, and $0.7 million,2017, respectively. The Company recognizes fair value adjustments recorded at the time of lease assumption in rental income on a straight line basis as a reduction to revenue over the remaining life

of the lease or any renewal periods for which the Company determines have value at the time of acquisition. The Company recognizes cost reimbursement revenue for real estate taxes, operating expenses, and common area maintenance costs on an accrual basis during the periods in which the expenses are incurred. The Company recognizes lease termination fees either upon termination or amortizes them over any remaining lease term. 
 
General Contracting and Real Estate Services Revenues

The Company recognizes general contracting revenues as a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. For each construction contract, the Company identifies the performance obligations, which typically include the delivery of a single building constructed according to the specifications of the contract. The Company estimates the total transaction price, which generally includes a fixed contract price and may also include variable components such as early completion bonuses, liquidated damages, or cost savings to be shared with the customer. Variable components of the contract price are included in the transaction price to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue on construction contractswill not occur. The Company recognizes the estimated transaction price as revenue as it satisfies its performance obligations; the Company estimates its progress in satisfying performance obligations for each contract using the percentage-of-completion method. Under thisinput method, the Company recognizes revenue and an estimated profit as construction contract costs are incurred based on the proportion of incurred costs relative to total estimated construction contract costs at completion. Construction contract costs include all direct material, direct labor, and subcontract costs, as well as any indirectand overhead costs directly related to contract performance. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are recognized immediately in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, are all significant judgments that may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which they are determined. Profit incentivesAdditionally, the estimated costs at completion are includedaffected by management’s forecasts of anticipated costs to be incurred and contingency reserves for exposures related to unknown costs, such as design deficiencies and subcontractor defaults. The estimated variable consideration is also affected by claims and unapproved change orders, which may result from changes in revenuesthe scope of the contract. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are recognized immediately in the period in which such losses are determined. The Company defers precontract costs when such costs are directly associated with specific anticipated contracts and their realizationrecovery is probable and when they can be reasonably estimated. probable.

The Company recognizes real estate services revenues from property development and management when realized and earned, generally as such services are provided. Multipleit satisfies its performance obligations under these service arrangements.

The Company assesses whether multiple contracts with a single counterparty are notmay be combined into a single contract for the revenue recognition purposes.purposes based on factors such as the timing of the negotiation and execution of the contracts and whether the economic substance of the contracts was contemplated separately or in tandem.
 
Real Estate Investments
 
Income producing property primarily includes land, buildings, and tenant improvements and is stated at cost. Real estate investments held for development include land and capitalized development costs. The Company reclassifies real estate investments held for development to construction in progress upon commencement of construction. Construction in progress is stated at cost. Direct and certain indirect costs clearly associated with the development, redevelopment, construction, leasing, or expansion of real estate assets are capitalized as a cost of the property. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
 
The Company capitalizes direct and indirect project costs associated with the initial constructiondevelopment of a property until the property is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Capitalized project costs include preacquisition, development, and preconstruction costs including overhead, salaries, and related costs of personnel directly involved, real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, ground rent, and interest. Interest capitalized during each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017 was $1.0$5.9 million, $1.0$5.0 million and $3.1$1.3 million, respectively. Overhead, salaries and related personnel costs capitalized during each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017 were $1.7$3.1 million, $2.1$3.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively.
 
The Company capitalizes preacquisition development costs directly identifiable with specific properties when the acquisition of such properties is probable. Capitalized preacquisition development costs are presented within other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Capitalized preacquisition development costs as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were $1.1$6.5 million and $2.5$1.2 million, respectively. Costs attributable to unsuccessful projects are expensed.
The Company recognizes real estate development grants from state and local governments as reductions to the carrying amounts of the related real estate investments when any attached conditions are satisfied and when there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received.
 

Income producing property is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:

Buildings39 years
Capital improvements15—5—20 years
Equipment5—153—7 years
Tenant improvementsTerm of the related lease
 (or estimated useful life, if shorter)

 
Operating Property Acquisitions
 
Acquisitions of operating properties have been and will generally be accounted for as acquisitions of a group of assets, with costs incurred to effect an acquisition, including title, legal, accounting, brokerage commissions, and other related costs, being capitalized as part of the cost of the assets acquired. In connection with operating propertysuch acquisitions, the Company identifies and recognizes all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values or relative fair values subsequent to the adoption of the new accounting guidance discussed below, as of the acquisition date. The purchase price allocations to tangible assets, such as land, site improvements, and buildings and improvements are presented within income producing property in the consolidated balance sheets and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Acquired lease intangiblesintangible assets are presented as a separate component of assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Acquired lease intangible liabilities are presented within other assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and amortized over their respective lease terms.sheets. The Company amortizes in-place lease assets as depreciation and amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the related leases. The Company amortizes above-market lease assets as reductions to rental revenues on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the related leases. The Company amortizes below-market lease liabilities as increases to rental revenues on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the related leases. The Company amortizes below-market ground lease assets as increases to rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the related leases. Prior to October 1, 2016, the Company expensed all costs incurred related to operating property acquisitions. On October 1, 2016, the Company adopted newly issued accounting guidance that allows capitalization of costs related to operating property acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business under the new guidance discussed below under "Recent Accounting Pronouncements".
 
The Company values land based on a market approach, looking to recent sales of similar properties, adjusting for differences due to location, the state of entitlement, as well as the shape and size of the parcel. Improvements to land are valued using a replacement cost approach. The approach applies industry standard replacement costs adjusted for geographic specific considerations and reduced by estimated depreciation. The value of buildings acquired is estimated using the replacement cost approach, assuming the buildings were vacant at acquisition. The replacement cost approach considers the composition of the structures acquired, adjusted for an estimate of depreciation. The estimate of depreciation is made considering industry standard information and depreciation curves for the identified asset classes. The value of acquired lease intangibles considers the estimated cost of leasing the properties as if the acquired buildings were vacant, as well as the value of the current leases relative to market-rate leases. The in-place lease value is determined using an estimated total lease-up time and lost rental revenues during such time. The value of current leases relative to market-rate leases is based on market rents obtained for market comparables. Given the significance of unobservable inputs used in the valuation of acquired real estate assets, the Company classifies them as Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.
 
The Company values debt assumed in connection with operating property acquisitions based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the expected cash flows of the debt. Such analysis considers the contractual terms of the debt, including the period to maturity, credit characteristics, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate information asother terms of the acquisition date. The Company also considers credit valuation adjustments for potential nonperformance risk. The Company classifies the inputs used to value debt assumed in connection with operating property acquisitions asarrangements, which are Level 23 inputs in the fair value hierarchy as they are predominantly observablehierarchy.

Real Estate Sales

The Company accounts for the sale of real estate assets and market-based.any related gain in accordance with the accounting guidance applicable to sales of real estate, which establishes standards for recognition of profit on all real estate sales transactions other than retail land sales. The Company recognizes the sale and associated gain or loss once it transfers control of the real estate asset and the Company does not have significant continuing involvement.

Real Estate Investments Held for Sale
 
Real estate assets classified as held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying value or their fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Once a property is classified as held for sale, it is no longer depreciated. A property is classified as held for sale when: (i) senior management commits to a plan to sell the property, (ii) the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition, subject only to conditions usual and customary for such sales, (iii) an active

program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell have been initiated, (iv) the sale is expected to be completed within one year, (v) the property is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value, and (vi) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.

The CompanyAs of December 31, 2019, a land parcel adjacent to the Market at Mill Creek shopping center was classified the Richmond Tower office building as held for sale assale. As of December 31, 2015. No properties were2018, the Waynesboro Commons shopping center was classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2016.sale.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets
 
The Company evaluates its real estate assets for impairment on a property by property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If such an evaluation is necessary, the Company compares the carrying amount of any such real estate asset with the undiscounted expected future cash flows that are directly associated with, and that are expected to arise as a direct result of, its use and eventual disposition. If the carrying amount of a real estate asset exceeds the associated estimate of undiscounted expected future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the real estate asset’s carrying value to its fair value. ImpairmentThe impairment charges recognized during each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2017 represent unamortized leasing or acquired intangible assets related to vacated tenants.  The impairment charges recognized during the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily relate to the $1.5 million impairment of Waynesboro Commons, which was classified as of held for sale as of December 31, 2018.
 
Interest Income
Interest income on notes receivable is accrued based on the contractual terms of the loans and when it is deemed collectible. Many loans provide for accrual of interest and fees that will not be paid until maturity of the loan. Interest is recognized on these loans at the accrual rate subject to the determination that accrued interest and fees are ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and the status of development activities, as applicable. If this determination cannot be made, recognition of interest income may be fully or partially deferred until it is ultimately paid.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits, investments in money market funds, and investments with an original maturity of three months or less.


Restricted Cash
 
Restricted cash represents amounts held by lenders for real estate taxes, insurance, and reserves for capital improvements. The Company presents changes in cash restricted for real estate taxes and insurance as operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company presents changes in cash restricted for capital improvements as investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. 
 
Accounts Receivable, net
 
Accounts receivable include amounts from tenants for base rents, contingent rents, and cost reimbursements as well as accrued straight-line rental revenue. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, accrued straight-line rental revenue presented within accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets was $12.3$17.9 million and $20.3$15.2 million, respectively.
 
The Company’s evaluation of the collectability of accounts receivable and the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based primarily upon evaluations of individual receivables, current economic conditions, historical experience, and other relevant factors. The Company establishes reservesa reserve for the receivables associated with a tenant receivables outstanding over 90 days. Forwhen collection of substantially all such tenants, the Company also reserves any related accrued straight-line rental revenue. Additional reserves are recordedoperating lease payments for more current amounts, as applicable, when the Company has determined collectability to be doubtful.a tenant is not probable. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the allowance for doubtful accounts was not significant.$0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The Company presents bad debt expense withinreflects these amounts as a component of rental expenses inincome on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. 
 
Notes Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses
 
From time to time, the Company may provideNotes receivable primarily represent financing to third parties in the form of mortgage or mezzanine loans for the development of new real estate. The Company's mezzanine loans are typically made to borrowers who have little or no equity in the underlying development projects. Mezzanine loans are secured, in part, by pledges of ownership interests

of the entities that own the underlying real estate. The loans generally have junior liens on the respective real estate projects.

The Company evaluates the collectability of both the interest on and principal of each of its notes receivable based primarily upon the financial conditionvalue of the individual borrowers.underlying development project. The Company considers factors such as the progress of development activities, including leasing activities, projected development costs, current and projected loan balances, and the estimated realizable value of the loan. The calculation of the estimated realizable value includes an estimation of the projected sales proceeds from the sale of the underlying development property, which is largely dependent on the estimated fair value of the underlying development property and is highly sensitive to significant assumptions based on management’s expectations about future real estate market or economic conditions and the projected operating results of the property. A loan is determined to be impaired when, based upon currentthen-current information, it is no longer probable that the Company will be able to collect all contractual amounts then due from the borrower. The amount of impairment loss recognized is measured as the difference between the carrying amount of the loan and its estimated realizable value.

The allowance for loan losses reflects management's estimate of loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date.

Guarantees
The Company measures and records a liability for the fair value of its guarantees on a nonrecurring basis upon issuance using Level 3 internally-developed inputs. These guarantees typically relate to payments that could be required of the Company to senior lenders on its mezzanine loan investments. The Company bases its estimated fair value on the market approach, which compares the guarantee terms and credit characteristics of the underlying development project to other projects for which guarantee pricing terms are available. The offsetting entry for the guarantee liability is a premium on the related loan receivable. The liability is amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the loan. On a quarterly basis, the Company assesses the likelihood of a contingent liability in connection with these guarantees and will record an additional guarantee liability if the unamortized guarantee liability is insufficient.
 
Leasing Costs
 
Commissions paid by the Company to third parties to originate a lease are deferred and amortized as depreciation and amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. Leasing costs are presented within other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
 

Leasing Incentives
 
Incentives paid by the Company to tenants are deferred and amortized as reductions to rental revenues on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. Leasing incentives are presented within other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
Debt Issuance Costs
 
Financing costs are deferred and amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the related debt. Debt issuance costs are presented as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability in the consolidated balance sheets.
 
Derivative Financial Instruments
 
The Company may enter into interest rate derivatives to manage exposure to interest rate risks. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company recognizes derivative financial instruments at fair value and presents them within other assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivatives that are neither designated nor qualify as hedging instruments are recognized within the change in fair value of interest rate derivatives caption in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. For derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.    
 

Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company measures the compensation cost of restricted stock awards based on the grant date fair value. The Company recognizes compensation cost for the vesting of restricted stock awards using the accelerated attribution method. Compensation cost associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards is presented within either general and administrative expenses or general contracting and real estate services expenses in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Total stock-based compensation expense recognized during each of the three years ended December 31, 2016 was $1.1 million, $0.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Stock-based compensation for personnel directly involved in the developmentconstruction and initial constructiondevelopment of a property is capitalized. During eachThe effect of the three years ended December 31, 2016, the Company capitalized $0.3 million, $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively,forfeitures of stock-based compensation.awards is recorded as they occur. 
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”)REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For continued qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to pay distributions to stockholders of at least 90% of annual taxable income, excluding net capital gains. As a REIT, the Company generally is not subject to income tax on net income distributed as dividends to stockholders. The Company is subject to state and local income taxes in some jurisdictions and, in certain circumstances, may also be subject to federal excise taxes on undistributed income. In addition, certain of the Company’s activities must be conducted by subsidiaries that have elected to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”("TRS") subject to both federal and state income taxes. The Operating Partnership conducts its development and construction businesses through the TRS. The related income tax provision or benefit attributable to the profits or losses of the TRS and any taxable income of the Company is reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
 
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income tax in accordance with GAAP. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the carrying value of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the statutory rates expected to be applied in the periods in which those temporary differences are settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the period of the change. A valuation allowance is recorded on the Company’s deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. When evaluating the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets, all evidence, both positive and negative, is evaluated. Items considered in this analysis include the ability to carrybackcarry back losses, the reversal of temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and expectations of future earnings.  
 

Under GAAP, the amount of tax benefit to be recognized is the amount of benefit that is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Management analyzes its tax filing positions in the U.S. federal, state and local jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns for all open tax years. If, based on this analysis, management determines that uncertainties in tax positions exist, a liability is established. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions in the provision for income taxes. If recognized, the entire amount of unrecognized tax positions would be recorded as a reduction to the provision for income taxes.
 
Discontinued Operations
 
Disposals representing a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results are reported as discontinued operations.
 
Net Income Per Share and Unit
 
The Company calculates net income per share and unit based upon the weighted average shares and units outstanding. Diluted net income per share and unit is calculated after giving effect to all significant potential dilutive shares outstanding during the period. Potential dilutive shares outstanding during the period include nonvested restricted stock awards. However, there were no0 significant potential dilutive shares or units outstanding for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016.2019, 2018, and 2017. As a result, basic and diluted outstanding shares and units were the same for all periodseach period presented. See Note 11 for the changes in the Company’s nonvested restricted awards during each of the three years ended December 31, 2016.    
Emerging Growth Company Status
The Company qualifies as an emerging growth company (“EGC”) pursuant to the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. An EGC may choose to take advantage of the extended private company transition period provided for complying with new or revised accounting standards that may be issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company has elected to opt out of such extended transition period. This election is irrevocable. 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued a new standard that provides a single, comprehensive model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. While the new standard does not supersede the guidance on accounting for leases, it could change the way the Company recognizes revenue from construction and development contracts with third party customers. The new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The Company plans to adopt the new standard using the full retrospective method. A substantial portion of our revenue consists of rental revenues from leasing arrangements, such as base rent, which is specifically excluded from the revenue guidance. Non-lease components, such as tenant reimbursements for real estate taxes and common area maintenance will be subject to the revenue guidance. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new revenue standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.Recently Issued Accounting Standards Adopted:

On August 15, 2014, the FASB issued guidance that requires management to evaluate relevant conditions, events and certain management plans that are known or reasonably knowable as of the evaluation date in order to determine whether substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern exists. This new guidance states that substantial doubt exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probably that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued, or are available to be issued. The new guidance was applicable for the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016. Management performed its evaluation and determined that there was no substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


On February 25, 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a new leases standardan Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") that requires lessees to recognize most leases inon their balance sheets as lease liabilities with corresponding right-of-use assets. This guidance will specifically affect the ground leases where the Company is the lessee.assets (ASU 2016-02—Leases (Topic 842)). The new standard also makes targeted changes to lessor accounting. The Company adopted the new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2019, and requires ausing the modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the datebeginning of the earliest comparative period presented as permitted in Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 842.

In addition, the Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which allowed the Company to not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and not reassess initial applicationdirect costs for existing leases. As of January 1, 2019, the Company did not have any leases classified as finance leases. The Company also elected a practical expedient that allowed it to not separate non-lease components from lease components and instead to account for each lease and non-lease component as a single lease component. The adoption of the new standard as of January 1, 2019 did not impact the Company's consolidated results of operations and had no impact on cash flows.

As a lessee, the Company had 6 ground leases on 5 properties as of January 1, 2019 with initial terms that ranged from 20 to 65 years and options to extend up to an additional 70 years in certain cases. The exercise of lease renewal options is at the Company's sole discretion. The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term. The Company recognizes lease expense for operating leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company's lease agreements do not contain any residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

The long-term ground leases represent a majority of the Company's current operating lease payments. The Company recorded right-of-use assets totaling $32.2 million and lease liabilities totaling $41.4 million upon adopting this standard on January 1, 2019. The Company utilized a weighted average discount rate of 5.4% to measure its lease liabilities upon adoption.

As a lessor, the Company leases its properties under operating leases and recognizes base rents on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company also recognizes revenue from tenant recoveries, through which tenants reimburse the Company on an accrual basis for certain expenses such as utilities, janitorial services, repairs and maintenance, security and alarms, parking lot and ground maintenance, administrative services, management fees, insurance, and real estate taxes. Rental revenues are reduced by the amount of any leasing incentives amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the applicable lease. In addition, the Company recognizes contingent rental revenue (e.g., percentage rents based on tenant sales thresholds) when the sales thresholds are met. Many tenant leases include 1 or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from one to 15 years or more. The exercise of lease renewal options is at the tenant's sole discretion. The Company includes a renewal period in the lease term only if it appears at lease inception that the renewal is reasonably certain.

The new standard includes new considerations regarding the recognition of rental revenue when collection is not probable. The Company changed its presentation and measurement of charges for uncollectable lease revenue associated with its office, retail, and residential leasing activity, reflecting those amounts as a component of rental income on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2019. However, in accordance with its prospective adoption of the standard, the Company did not adjust the prior year period presentation of charges for uncollectable lease revenue associated with its office, retail, and residential leasing activity as a component of operating expenses, excluding property taxes, on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. The Company recorded a combined adjustment of $0.2 million to the opening balances for distributions in excess of earnings and noncontrolling interest relating to receivables where collection of substantially all operating lease payments was not probable as of January 1, 2019.


Lease-related receivables, which include contractual amounts accrued and unpaid from tenants and accrued straight-line rents receivable, are reduced for credit losses. Such amounts are recognized as a reduction to real estate rental revenues. The Company evaluates the collectability of lease receivables using several factors, including a lessee’s creditworthiness. The Company recognizes a credit loss on lease-related receivables when, in the opinion of management, collection of substantially all lease payments is not probable. When collectability is determined not probable, any lease income subsequent to recognizing the credit loss is limited to the lesser of the lease income reflected on a straight-line basis or cash collected.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted:

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments and in November 2018 issued ASU No. 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. The guidance significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The guidance will replace the "incurred loss" approach under existing guidance with an option"expected loss" model for instruments measured at amortized cost, such as our notes receivable. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and is to use certain transition relief. For lease contracts withbe adopted through a durationcumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of more than one yearthe beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The Company iscontinues to evaluate the lessee, the present value of future lease payments will be recognized on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a

corresponding lease liability. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of theadopting this new leasesaccounting standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.statements accounting policy and operational implementation issues. The Company expects that the adoption will result in earlier recognition of a provision for loan losses on its notes receivable and an insignificant increase in allowance for bad debt relating to construction receivables as a result of new forward-looking estimation requirements. The Company anticipates recording a reserve for expected credit losses for its notes receivable in an amount between $2.3 million and $3.3 million and an immaterial reserve on its construction receivables as a result of adopting the new standard on January 1, 2020.


On March 30, 2016,In August 2018, the FASB issued new guidance that will changeASU 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the accountingDisclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement" ("ASU 2018-13"). ASU 2018-13 eliminates, adds and modifies certain aspectsdisclosure requirements for fair value measurements as part of share-based payments to employees.  Entities will be required to recognize the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled, and allows the Company to account for forfeitures as they occur.its disclosure framework project. The new guidancestandard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017.  Managementall entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2018-13 is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 

On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that addresses eight classification issues related to the statement of cash flows. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. This guidance should be applied retrospectively to each period presented. This new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

On October 26, 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that updates the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is a single decision maker of a variable interest entity ("VIE") should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017.  Management does not expect the adoption of the new guidanceexpected to have a material effectimpact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that requires the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash and cash equivalents along with restricted cash and cash equivalents. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. This new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new guidance on the Company’sCompany's consolidated financial statements.

On January 5, 2017, the FASB issued new guidance that modifies the definition of a business. Under this new guidance, many real estate acquisitions will now be considered asset acquisitions, allowing costs associated with these acquisitions to be capitalized. Early adoption is permitted on a prospective basis for interimstatements or annual periods for which the financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance. The Company adopted this guidance on October 1, 2016, resulting in the capitalization of approximately $0.7 million of acquisition costs related to two acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2016. If the Company had adopted this guidance on January 1, 2016, approximately $1.4 million in acquisition costs would have been capitalized.disclosures.
 
3.Segments
 
Net operating income (segment revenues minus segment expenses) is the measure used by the Company’s chief operating decision-maker to assess segment performance. Net operating income is not a measure of operating income or cash flows from operating activities as measured by GAAP and is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. As a result, net operating income should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Not all companies calculate net operating income in the same manner. The Company considers net operating income to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it assists both investors and management in understanding the core operations of the Company’s real estate and construction businesses. 
 

Net operating income of the Company’s reportable segments for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017 was as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Office real estate              
Rental revenues$33,269
 $20,701
 $19,207
Rental expenses8,722
 5,858
 5,483
Real estate taxes3,471
 2,034
 1,859
Segment net operating income21,076
 12,809
 11,865
Retail real estate     
Rental revenues77,593
 67,959
 63,109
Rental expenses11,656
 10,903
 10,234
Real estate taxes7,916
 6,801
 6,175
Segment net operating income58,021
 50,255
 46,700
Multifamily residential real estate     
Rental revenues40,477
 28,298
 26,421
Rental expenses13,954
 10,461
 9,705
Real estate taxes3,574
 2,548
 2,494
Segment net operating income22,949
 15,289
 14,222
General contracting and real estate services     
Segment revenues105,859
 76,359
 194,034
Segment expenses101,538
 73,628
 186,590
Segment gross profit4,321
 2,731
 7,444
Net operating income$106,367
 $81,084
 $80,231
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
Office real estate              
Rental revenues$20,929
 $31,534
 $27,827
Rental expenses5,560
 6,938
 6,395
Real estate taxes2,000
 2,950
 2,315
Segment net operating income13,369
 21,646
 19,117
Retail real estate     
Rental revenues56,511
 32,064
 23,956
Rental expenses9,116
 5,915
 5,011
Real estate taxes5,395
 2,928
 2,097
Segment net operating income42,000
 23,221
 16,848
Multifamily residential real estate     
Rental revenues21,915
 17,574
 12,963
Rental expenses7,228
 6,351
 5,261
Real estate taxes2,234
 1,904
 1,331
Segment net operating income12,453
 9,319
 6,371
General contracting and real estate services     
Segment revenues159,030
 171,268
 103,321
Segment expenses153,375
 165,344
 98,754
Segment gross profit5,655
 5,924
 4,567
Net operating income$73,477
 $60,110
 $46,903

 
Rental expenses represent costs directly associated with the operation and management of the Company’s real estate properties. Rental expenses include asset management fees, property management fees, repairs and maintenance, insurance, and utilities.
 
General contracting and real estate services revenues for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017 exclude revenue related to intercompany construction contracts of $43.3$99.9 million, $43.1$134.4 million and $85.4$51.5 million, respectively.respectively, as it is eliminated in consolidation. General contracting and real estate services expenses for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017 exclude expenses related to intercompany construction contracts of $42.7$99.0 million, $42.8$133.4 million and $84.6$51.0 million, respectively. General contracting and real estate services expenses for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016 include noncash stock compensation expense of $0.2 million.

respectively, as it is eliminated in consolidation.

The following table reconciles net operating income to net income for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017 (in thousands):
 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Net operating income$106,367
 $81,084
 $80,231
Depreciation and amortization(54,564) (39,913) (37,321)
Amortization of right-of-use assets - finance leases(377) —
 —
General and administrative expenses(12,392) (11,431) (10,435)
Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs(844) (352) (648)
Impairment charges(252) (1,619) (110)
Gain on real estate dispositions4,699
 4,254
 8,087
Interest income23,215
 10,729
 7,077
Interest expense on indebtedness(30,776) (19,087) (17,439)
Interest expense on finance leases(568) —
 —
Equity in income of unconsolidated real estate entities273
 372
 —
Loss on extinguishment of debt—
 (11) (50)
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives(3,599) (951) 1,127
Other income (expense), net585
 388
 131
Income tax benefit (provision)491
 29
 (725)
Net income$32,258
 $23,492
 $29,925
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
Net operating income$73,477
 $60,110
 $46,903
Depreciation and amortization(35,328) (23,153) (17,569)
General and administrative expenses(9,552) (8,397) (7,711)
Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs(1,563) (1,935) (229)
Impairment charges(355) (41) (15)
Interest income3,228
 126
 —
Interest expense(16,466) (13,333) (10,648)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(82) (512) —
Gain on real estate dispositions30,533
 18,394
 2,211
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives(941) (229) (233)
Other income147
 119
 120
Income tax benefit (provision)(343) 34
 (70)
Net income$42,755
 $31,183
 $12,759

 
General and administrative expenses represent costs not directly associated with the operation and management of the Company’s real estate properties and general contracting and real estate services businesses. General and administrative expenses include corporate office personnel salaries and benefits, bank fees, accounting fees, legal fees, and other corporate office expenses. General and administrative expenses for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016 include noncash stock compensation expense of $0.7 million, $0.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
  
4.Operating Leases

Lessee Disclosures

The Company’s commercial tenantcomponents of lease cost for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 were as follows (in thousands):
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2019 
2018 (b)
 
2017 (b)
Operating lease cost $2,700
 $2,962
 $2,686
Finance lease cost:      
Amortization of right-of-use assets (a)
 369
 —
 —
Interest on lease liabilities 568
 —
 —
(a) Includes amortization of below-market ground lease intangible assets.
(b) All of the Company's leases generally range fromwere classified as operating leases prior to 2019.

The table below presents supplemental cash flow information related to leases during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 (in thousands):
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2019 
2018 (a)
 
2017 (a)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities      
Operating cash flows from operating leases $1,969
 $2,354
 $2,103
Operating cash flows from finance leases 533
 —
 —
(a) All of the Company's leases were classified as operating leases prior to 2019.


Additional information related to leases as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:

  December 31, 
  2019 
2018 (a)
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (years)    
Operating leases 45.4
 46.2
Finance leases 41.2
 0.0
     
Weighted Average Discount Rate (b)
    
Operating leases 5.4% —%
Finance leases 5.2% —%
(a) All of the Company's leases were classified as operating leases prior to 2019.
(b) Prior to the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, the use of a discount rate to calculate lease liability as the net present value of the minimum lease payments was not required.

The undiscounted cash flows to be paid on an annual basis for the next five years and thereafter are presented below. The total amount of lease payments, on an undiscounted basis, are reconciled to 20the lease liability, on the consolidated balance sheet by considering the present value discount.
Year Ending December 31, Operating Leases Finance Leases
  (in thousands)
2020 $2,080
 $864
2021 2,137
 864
2022 2,361
 868
2023 2,400
 873
2024 2,436
 888
Thereafter 103,524
 43,014
Total undiscounted cash flows 114,938
 47,371
Present value discount (73,464) (29,468)
Discounted cash flows $41,474
 $17,903


Lessor Disclosures

Rental revenue for the years but certain leases with anchor tenants may be longer. ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 comprised the following (in thousands):
  Years Ended December 31, 
  2019 2018 2017
Base rent and tenant charges $147,309
 $114,012
 $107,320
Accrued straight-line rental adjustment 3,402
 2,731
 1,222
Lease incentive amortization (739) (732) (785)
Above/below market lease amortization 1,367
 947
 980
Total rental revenue $151,339
 $116,958
 $108,737



The Company’sCompany's commercial tenant leases provide for minimum rental payments during each of the next five years and thereafter as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31, Operating Leases
2020 $96,374
2021 90,165
2022 82,862
2023 72,673
2024 61,926
Thereafter 266,467
Total $670,467


2017$70,235
201865,384
201957,751
202047,217
202140,783
Thereafter206,378
Total$487,748
Lease terms on multifamily apartment units generally range from seven to 15 months, with a majority having 12-month lease terms. Apartment leases are not included in the preceding table as the remaining terms as of December 31, 2016 are generally less than one year. 


5.Real Estate Investments and Equity Method Investments
 
The Company’s real estate investments comprised the following as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2016December 31, 2019
Income
producing
property
 
Held
for
development
 
Construction
in
progress
 TotalIncome producing property Held for development Construction in progress Total
Land$171,733
 $680
 $6,880
 $179,293
$263,258
 $5,000
 $7,265
 $275,523
Land improvements45,052
 —
 —
 45,052
58,636
 —
 —
 58,636
Buildings and improvements677,293
 —
 —
 677,293
1,138,829
 —
 —
 1,138,829
Development and construction costs—
 —
 6,649
 6,649
—
 —
 133,336
 133,336
Real estate investments$894,078
 $680
 $13,529
 $908,287
$1,460,723
 $5,000
 $140,601
 $1,606,324
 
 December 31, 2018
 Income producing property Held for development Construction in progress Total
Land$192,677
 $2,994
 $17,961
 $213,632
Land improvements53,521
 —
 —
 53,521
Buildings and improvements791,719
 —
 —
 791,719
Development and construction costs—
 —
 117,714
 117,714
Real estate investments$1,037,917
 $2,994
 $135,675
 $1,176,586
 December 31, 2015
 Income
producing
property		 Held
for
development		 Construction
in
progress		 Total
Land$70,518
 $1,180
 $7,750
 $79,448
Land improvements26,172
 —
 —
 26,172
Buildings and improvements482,310
 —
 —
 482,310
Development and construction costs—
 —
 45,661
 45,661
Real estate investments$579,000
 $1,180
 $53,411
 $633,591

 
20162019 Operating Property Acquisitions

On January 14, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of an 11 asset retail portfolio totaling 1.1 million square feet for $170.5 million.

On April 29, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Southgate Square, a 220,000 square foot retail center located in Colonial Heights, Virginia, for aggregate consideration of $39.5 million, comprised of the assumption of $21.1 million in debt (which approximated fair value as of the closing date) and 1,575,185 Class A Units.

As part of the Southgate Square purchase agreement,February 6, 2019, the Company acquired an additional outparcel phase of Wendover Village in Greensboro, North Carolina for a contract price of $2.7 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.1 million. This phase is leased by a single tenant.

On March 14, 2019, the Company acquired the office and retail portions of the One City Center project in Durham, North Carolina in exchange for a redemption of its 37% equity ownership in the joint venture with Austin Lawrence Partners, which totaled $23.0 million as of the acquisition date, and a cash payment of $23.2 million. The Company also incurred capitalized acquisition costs of $0.1 million.

On April 24, 2019, the Company exercised its option to purchase an adjacent undeveloped land parcel79% of the interests in the partnership that owns 1405 Point in exchange for extinguishing the Company's $31.3 million note receivable on the project, making a cash payment of $0.3 million, and assuming a loan payable of $64.9 million, which was recorded at its fair value of $65.8 million. The Company also incurred capitalized acquisition costs of $0.1 million.

On May 23, 2019, the Company acquired Red Mill Commons and Marketplace at Hilltop from Venture Realty Group for consideration comprised of 4.1 million Class A units of limited partnership interest in the seller.Operating Partnership

("Class A Units" or "OP Units"), the assumption of $35.7 million of mortgage debt principal, and $4.5 million in cash. The optionnegotiated price was $105.0 million, which contemplated the price of the Company's common stock of $15.55 per share when the purchase and sale agreement was executed. The aggregate acquisition cost was $109.3 million, which consisted of 4.1 million Class A Units valued at $68.1 million (using the price of the Company's common stock of $16.50 on the date of the acquisition), mortgage debt valued at $35.6 million, cash consideration of $4.5 million, and capitalized acquisition costs of $1.1 million. In connection with the acquisition, the Company and the Operating Partnership entered into a tax protection agreement with the contributors pursuant to which the Company and the Operating Partnership agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to indemnify the contributors for up to 10 years against certain tax liabilities incurred by them, if such liabilities result from a transaction involving a direct or indirect taxable disposition of either or both of these properties or if the land parcel is valid for an initial period of two years,Operating Partnership fails to maintain and its value would be determined by applying a mutually agreed upon capitalization rateallocate to the base rentcontributors for taxation purposes minimum levels of tenants provided by the seller and approved by the Company. If, at the end of the two-year period, no suitable tenants have been found,Operating Partnership liabilities.

On June 26, 2019, the Company has the option of either paying $3.0 million to the seller for the land parcel or extending the period for an additional year. If, at the end of the additional year, no suitable tenants have been found, the Company can either pay $1.25 million to the seller for the land parcel or let the option expire. Management has evaluated the option and determined that its value is immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

On August 4, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Southshore Shops,acquired Thames Street Wharf, a 40,000 square foot retail centerClass A office building located in Midlothian, Virginia,the Harbor Point development of Baltimore, Maryland, for aggregate consideration of $9.3 million, comprised of $6.7$101.0 million in cash and 189,160 Class A Units.$0.3 million of capitalized acquisition costs.


The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation (including acquisition costs) based on the relative fair value of the assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed for the 6 operating properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

  Wendover Village additional outparcel One City Center 1405 Point Red Mill Commons Marketplace at Hilltop Thames Street Wharf
Land $1,633
 $2,678
 $—
(a) 
$44,252
 $2,023
(b) 
$15,861
Site improvements 50
 163
 298
 2,558
 691
 150
Building and improvements 888
 28,039
 92,866
 27,790
 19,195
 64,539
Furniture and fixtures —
 —
 2,302
 —
 —
 —
In-place leases 101
 15,140
 3,371
 9,973
 4,565
 24,385
Above-market leases 111
 —
 —
 1,463
 599
 —
Below-market leases —
 —
 —
 (6,221) (1,136) (3,636)
Finance lease liabilities —
 —
 (8,671) —
 (9,200) —
Finance lease right-of-use assets —
 —
 11,730
(a) 
—
 12,770
(b) 
—
Net assets acquired $2,783
 $46,020
 $101,896
 $79,815
 $29,507
 $101,299

(a) Land is subject to a ground lease.
(b) Portion of land is subject to a ground lease.

2018 Operating Property Acquisitions

On October 13, 2016,January 9, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of Columbus Village II,acquired Indian Lakes Crossing, a 92,000 square foot retail and entertainmentHarris Teeter-anchored shopping center located in Virginia Beach, Virginia, for aggregatea contract price of $14.7 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.2 million.

On January 29, 2018, the Company acquired Parkway Centre, a newly developed Publix-anchored shopping center in Moultrie, Georgia, for total consideration of 2,000,000 shares$11.3 million (comprised of $9.6 million in cash and $1.7 million in the Company's common stock, which based onform of Class A Units) plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.3 million.

On August 28, 2018, the closing stock price on the date of the acquisition, led to an acquisitionCompany acquired Lexington Square, a newly developed Lowes Foods-anchored shopping center in Lexington, South Carolina, for a purchase price of $26.2$27.0 million, excludingconsisting of cash consideration of $24.2 million and $2.8 million of additional consideration in the form of Class A Units issued during 2019. As part of this transaction, the Company also capitalized acquisition costs.

On November 17, 2016, the Company completed the acquisitioncosts of Renaissance Square, a 80,000 square foot retail center located in Davidson, North Carolina, for $17.1 million, excluding capitalized acquisition costs.

$0.4 million.

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation (including acquisition costs for Columbus Village II and Renaissance Square)costs) based on relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the 3 operating properties purchased during the year ended December 31, 20162018 (in thousands):

  Indian Lakes Crossing Parkway Centre Lexington Square
Land $10,926
 $1,372
 $3,036
Site improvements 531
 696
 7,396
Building and improvements 1,913
 7,168
 10,387
In-place leases 1,648
 2,346
 4,113
Above-market leases 11
 —
 89
Below-market leases (175) (10) (447)
Net assets acquired $14,854
 $11,572
 $24,574


2017 Operating Property Acquisitions

On July 25, 2017, the Company acquired an outparcel phase of Wendover Village in Greensboro, North Carolina for a contract price of $14.3 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.1 million. The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation, including acquisition costs, for this property (in thousands):

Land$5,550
Site improvements232
Building and improvements6,977
In-place leases1,382
Above-market leases327
Below-market leases(50)
Net assets acquired$14,418

 
Retail
Portfolio
 
Southgate Square
 Southshore Shops Columbus Village II Renaissance Square Total
Land$66,260
 $8,890
 $1,770
 $14,536
 $6,730
 $98,186
Site improvements3,870
 2,140
 490
 939
 303
 7,742
Building and improvements88,820
 23,810
 6,019
 9,983
 8,137
 136,769
In-place leases20,630
 5,990
 1,140
 2,225
 2,008
 31,993
Above-market leases1,960
 100
 120
 —
 70
 2,250
Below-market leases(11,040) (1,400) (190) (939) (10) (13,579)
Net assets acquired$170,500
 $39,530
 $9,349
 $26,744
 $17,238
 $263,361


Other 2019 Real Estate Transactions
Rental revenues
On April 1, 2019, the Company sold Waynesboro Commons for a sale price of $1.1 million. There was no gain or loss recognized on the disposition.

On August 15, 2019, the Company sold Lightfoot Marketplace for a sale price of $30.3 million. The gain on disposition was $4.5 million. In conjunction with this sale, the Company paid off the $17.9 million note payable secured by this property. The Company retained the interest rate swap associated with the note payable.

On October 15, 2019, the Company entered into an operating agreement with a partner to develop a mixed-use project in Roswell, Georgia. The Company has an 80% interest in the partnership. On October 25, 2019, the partnership, 1023 Roswell, LLC, purchased land for a purchase price of $5.0 million in cash for this project. The Company is responsible for funding the equity requirements of this development, including the $5.0 million purchase of the land. Management has concluded that this entity is a VIE as it lacks sufficient equity to fund its operations without additional financial support. The Company is the developer of the project and net income fromhas the 2016 acquired properties forpower to direct the period fromactivities of the respective acquisition datesproject that most significantly impact its performance and is the party most closely associated with the project. Therefore, the Company is the project's primary beneficiary and consolidates the project in its consolidated financial statements.

Subsequent to December 31, 2016 included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income was $18.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively.2019

2015 Operating Property Acquisitions


On April 8, 2015,January 10, 2020, the Company completed the acquisitions of Stone House Square in Hagerstown, Maryland and Perry Hall Marketplace in Perry Hall, Maryland. In exchange for both properties, the Company paid $35.4 million of cash and issued 415,500 shares of common stock. The acquisition date fair value of the total consideration transferred in exchange for Stone House Square and Perry Hall Marketplace was $39.8 million.
On July 1, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of Socastee Commons, a 57,000 square foot retail center in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The total consideration for Socastee Commons was $8.7 million, which was comprised of $3.7 million of cash and the assumption of debt with an outstanding principal balance of $5.0 million. The fair value adjustment to the assumed debt of Socastee Commons was a $0.1 million premium.
On July 10, 2015, the Company acquired Columbus Village, a 65,000 square foot retail center in Virginia Beach, Virginia. In exchange for Columbus Village, the Company assumed debt with an aggregate outstanding principal balance and fair value of $8.8 million, issued 1,000,000 Class B units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“Class B Units”) and agreed to issue 275,000 Class C units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“Class C Units”) on January 10, 2017. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, the Class B Units and Class C Units will not earn or accrue distributions until July 10, 2017 and January 10, 2018, respectively, at which time they automatically convert to Class A Units and may be tendered for redemption by the Operating Partnership in exchange for cash equal to the market price of shares of the Company’s common stock or, at the Company’s option and sole discretion, unregistered or registered shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis. The estimated fair value of the Class B Units and Class C Units includes a discount for their lack of marketability and distributions until July 10, 2017 and January 10, 2018, respectively. The acquisition date fair value of the total consideration transferred in exchange for Columbus Village was $19.2 million.
On September 1, 2015, the Company acquired Providence Plazapurchased land in Charlotte, North Carolina for $26.2a purchase price of $6.3 million for the development of cash. Providence Plazaa mixed-use property.


Other 2018 Real Estate Transactions

On November 30, 2017, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Bottling Group, LLC for a new distribution facility that the Company developed and constructed. On January 29, 2018, the Company acquired undeveloped land in Chesterfield, Virginia, a portion of which serves as the site for this facility, for a contract price of $2.4 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.1 million. On December 20, 2018, the Company sold the completed facility for $25.9 million, resulting in a gain of $3.4 million.

On January 18, 2018, the Company entered into an operating agreement with a partner to develop a Lowes Foods-anchored shopping center in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina. The Company has a 70% ownership interest in the partnership. The partnership, Market at Mill Creek Partners, LLC, acquired undeveloped land on February 16, 2018 for a contract price of $2.9 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.1 million. The Company is responsible for funding the equity requirements of this development. Management has concluded that this entity is a mixed-use property comprised of three buildings totaling 103,000 square feet, a two-level parking garage and approximately one acre of land zoned for multifamily development.


VIE as it lacks sufficient equity to fund its operations without additional financial support. The following table summarizesCompany was the acquisition date fair valuesdeveloper of the assetsshopping center and has the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance and is the party most closely associated with the project. Therefore, the Company is the project's primary beneficiary and consolidates the project in its consolidated financial statements.

On April 2, 2018, the Company acquired and liabilities assumed during the year ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Land$29,500
Site improvements3,290
Building and improvements49,260
In-place leases14,160
Above-market leases2,260
Below-market leases(4,420)
Indebtedness(13,935)
Net assets acquired$80,115
Rental revenues and net income from the 2015 acquired propertiesundeveloped land in Newport News, Virginia for the period from the respective acquisition dates to December 31, 2015 includedless than $0.1 million. This land parcel was used in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income was $4.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
2014 Operating Property Acquisitions
The Company completed the acquisition of Liberty Apartments on January 17, 2014. The fair valuedevelopment of the total consideration transferred at the acquisition date to acquire Liberty Apartments was $26.7 million, consisting of 695,652 Class A Units, $3.0 million in cash and the assumption of $17.0 million of debt. The fair value adjustment to the assumed debt of Liberty Apartments was a $1.5 million discount. The outstanding principal balance of the assumed debt of Liberty Apartments at the acquisition date was $18.5 million.Brooks Crossing Office property.

On August 15, 2014,May 24, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of Dimmock Square, a 106,166 square foot retail center located in Colonial Heights, Virginia. The fair valuesale of the total consideration transferredWawa outparcel at Indian Lakes Crossing for a contract price of $4.4 million. There was 0 gain or loss on the disposition.

On July 2, 2018, the Company executed a ground lease for the site of a new mixed-use development project at Wills Wharf, a site in the Harbor Point area of Baltimore, Maryland. The lease has an initial term of five years and includes 10 extension options of seven years each.

On December 31, 2018, the Company sold the leasehold interest in the building previously leased by Home Depot at Broad Creek Shopping Center for $2.4 million, resulting in a gain on sale of $0.8 million.

Other 2017 Real Estate Transactions

On January 4, 2017, the Company acquired undeveloped land in Charleston, South Carolina for a contract price of $7.1 million plus capitalized acquisition date to acquire Dimmock Square was $19.7 million, consistingcosts of 990,952 OP Units and $10.1 million of cash that was$0.2 million. The Company used to immediately defease the loan secured by Dimmock Square upon its contribution toland for the Operating Partnership.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair valuesdevelopment of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the year ended December 31, 2014 (in thousands):Hoffler Place property.
Land$8,680
Site improvements880
Building and improvements35,740
In-place leases2,220
Indebtedness(16,966)
Above and below-market leases(390)
Net working capital(679)
Net assets acquired$29,485
Rental revenues and net loss from the 2014 acquired properties for the period from the respective acquisition dates to December 31, 2014 included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income was $1.8 million and $(2.2) million, respectively.

Pro Forma Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the consolidated results of operations of the Company on a pro forma basis, as if each of the 2016 acquisitions had been acquired on January 1, 2015, each of the 2015 acquisitions had been acquired on January 1, 2014 and each of the 2014 acquisitions had been acquired on January 1, 2013 (in thousands): 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
Rental revenues$101,250
 $105,479
 $74,530
Net income13,327
 18,492
 13,378
The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if these acquisitions had taken place on January 1, 2015, 2014 and 2013. The pro forma financial information includes adjustments to rental revenue and rental expenses for above and below-market leases, adjustments to depreciation and amortization expense for acquired property and in-place lease assets and adjustments to interest expense for fair value adjustments to assumed debt. 
Subsequent to December 31, 2016


On January 20, 2017, the Company completed the sale of the Wawa outparcel at Greentree Shopping Center. Net proceeds after transaction costs were $4.4 million. The gain on the disposition was $3.4 million.
Other 2016 Real Estate Transactions


On January 7, 2016,July 11, 2017, the Company acquired undeveloped land in Charleston, South Carolina for a contract price of $7.2 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.1 million. The Company is using the land for the development of the Summit Place property.

On July 13, 2017, the Company completed the sale of 2 office properties leased by the Commonwealth of Virginia in Chesapeake, Virginia and Virginia Beach, Virginia. Aggregate net proceeds from the dispositions of the properties after transaction costs and repayment of the loan associated with the Chesapeake, Virginia property were $7.9 million, and the aggregate gain on the dispositions was $4.2 million.

On August 10, 2017, the Company completed the sale of a building constructed for the Economic Development Authority of Newport News, Virginia.land outparcel at Sandbridge Commons. Net proceeds after transaction costs and a partial loan paydown were $6.6$0.3 million. The gain on the disposition was $0.4$0.5 million.

On January 8, 2016, the Company completed the sale of the Richmond Tower office building for $78.0 million. Net proceeds after transaction costs were $77.0 million. The gain on the disposition of Richmond Tower was $26.2 million.

On June 20, 2016, the Company completed the sale of the Willowbrook Commons property located in Nashville, Tennessee for $9.2 million.  The gain on the sale of the Willowbrook Commons property was less than $0.1 million.
On July 29, 2016, the Company completed the sale of the Kroger Junction property located in Pasadena, Texas for $3.7 million. The loss on the sale of the Kroger Junction property was less than $0.1 million.

On August 30, 2016, the Company entered into an operating agreement with Southern Apartment Group-Harding, LLC ("SAGH") to jointly develop an apartment development project in Charlotte, North Carolina. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company purchased $5.7 million of land in conjunction with the project.

On September 15, 2016, the Company completed the sale of the Oyster Point office property for $6.4 million. Net proceeds after transaction costs and settlement of liabilities were not significant. The gain on the disposition of Oyster Point was $3.8 million.

On December 22, 2016, the Company completed the sale of land adjacent to the Brooks Crossing development for $0.4 million. The gain on the disposition of the land was less than $0.1 million.
Other 2015 Real Estate Transactions
On January 5, 2015, the Company completed the sale of the Sentara Williamsburg office property for $15.4 million. Net proceeds to the Company after transaction costs were $15.2 million. The Company recognized a gain on the disposition of the Sentara Williamsburg office property of $6.2 million. 
On February 13, 2015, the Company agreed to the future sale of the Oyster Point office property for $6.5 million. The Company completed the sale on September 15, 2016.

On March 31, 2015, the Company purchased land held for development in the Town Center of Virginia Beach, Virginia for $1.2 million.
On May 20, 2015, the Company completed the sale of Whetstone Apartments for $35.6 million. Net proceeds to the Company after transaction costs were $35.5 million. The Company recognized a gain on the disposition of Whetstone Apartments of $7.2 million. 
On October 5, 2015, the Company purchased 3.24 acres of land in Newport News, Virginia for $0.1 million for the development of Brooks Crossing, a new urban, mixed-use and low-rise development project, in partnership with the City of Newport News.

On October 30, 2015, the Company completed the sale of the Oceaneering International facility for $30.0 million. Net proceeds to the Company after transaction costs were $29.0 million. The Company recognized a gain on the disposition of Oceaneering of $5.0 million.

Other 2014 Real Estate Transactions
On April 16, 2014, the Company purchased land in Williamsburg, Virginia for $7.6 million for the development and construction of Lightfoot Marketplace.
On May 1, 2014, the Company purchased land in Chesapeake, Virginia for $0.3 million for the development and construction of a new administrative building for the Commonwealth of Virginia.
On September 29, 2014, the Company purchased land in Virginia Beach, Virginia for $0.2 million for the development and construction of a new administrative building for the Commonwealth of Virginia.
On November 20, 2014, the Company completed the sale of the Virginia Natural Gas office property for $8.9 million in cash. Net proceeds to the Company after transaction costs and tax protection payments were $7.4 million. The gain on the disposition of the Virginia Natural Gas office property was $2.2 million.  

Equity Method Investments


One City Center


On February 25, 2016, the Company acquired a 37% interest in DurhamOne City Center, II, LLC (“City Center”)a joint venture with Austin Lawrence Partners, for purposes of developing a 22-story mixed usemixed-use tower in Durham, North Carolina. As of The Company was a minority partner in the joint venture and served as the project's general contractor. During the years ended

December 31, 2016,2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company has invested $10.3$0.5 million, $7.3 million and $11.2 million, respectively, in One City Center. The Company has agreed

For the period from January 1, 2019 to guarantee 37% of the construction loan for City Center; however, the loan is collateralized by 100% of the assets of City Center.  As of December 31, 2016, the construction loan has not been drawn against.
As of December 31, 2016, the difference between the carrying value of the Company’s initial investment inMarch 13, 2019, One City Center andhad operating income of $0.3 million allocated to the amount of underlying equity was immaterial.Company. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, One City Center did not have anyhad operating income of $0.4 million allocated to the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2017, One City Center had 0 operating activity, and therefore the Company did not receive any dividends orreceived 0 allocated income. 
 
Based on the terms of City Center’s operating agreement,On March 14, 2019, the Company has concluded that City Center is a variable interest entity,acquired the office and that the Company holds a variable interest. The Company does not have the power to direct the activitiesretail portions of the project that most significantly impact its performance.   Accordingly, the Company is not the project’s primary beneficiary and, therefore, does not consolidateOne City Center in exchange for its consolidated financial statements.37% equity ownership in the joint venture and a cash payment of $23.2 million.





6.Notes Receivable
 
Point Street ApartmentsThe Company had the following loans receivable outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 ($ in thousands):
  Outstanding loan amount Maximum loan commitment Interest rate Interest compounding
Development Project December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018  
1405 Point $—
 $30,238
 $31,032
 8.0% Monthly
The Residences at Annapolis Junction 40,049
 36,361
 48,105
 10.0% Monthly
North Decatur Square —
 18,521
 29,673
 15.0% Annually
Delray Plaza 12,995
 7,032
 15,000
 15.0% Annually
Nexton Square 15,097
 14,855
 17,000
 10.0%
(b) 
Monthly
Interlock Commercial 59,224
 18,269
 95,000
 15.0% None
Solis Apartments at Interlock 25,588
 13,821
 41,100
 13.0% Annually
Total mezzanine 152,953
 139,097
 $276,910
    
Other notes receivable 1,147
 1,275
      
Notes receivable guarantee premium 5,271
 2,800
      
Notes receivable discount, net (a)
 —
 (4,489)      
Total notes receivable $159,371
 $138,683
      

(a) Represents the remaining unamortized portion of the $5.0 million loan modification fee for The Residences at Annapolis Junction paid by the borrower in November 2018.
(b) The interest rate was 15% until October 1, 2019.


Interest on the mezzanine loans is accrued and funded utilizing the interest reserves for each loan, which are components of the respective maximum loan commitments, and such accrued interest is added to the loan receivable balances. The Company recognized interest income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 as follows (in thousands):
  Years Ended December 31, 
Development Project 2019 2018 2017
1405 Point $783
 $2,080
 $1,741
The Residences at Annapolis Junction 8,776
(a) 
4,939
(a) 
4,132
North Decatur Square 1,509
 2,212
 1,035
Delray Plaza 1,622
 928
 163
Nexton Square 1,962
 235
 —
Interlock Commercial 6,142
(b) 
202
 —
Solis Apartments at Interlock 2,333
 55
 —
Total mezzanine 23,127
 10,651
 7,071
Other interest income 88
 78
 6
Total interest income $23,215
 $10,729
 $7,077

(a) Includes amortization of the $5.0 million loan modification fee paid by the borrower in November 2018. Additionally, the 2019 amount includes $0.5 million of interest income recognition relating to an exit fee that is due upon repayment of the loan.
(b) Includes $0.6 million of interest income recognition relating to an exit fee that is due upon repayment of the loan.

Based upon current information, there are no loans for which it is no longer probable that the Company will be able to collect all contractual amounts then due from the borrower. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was 0 allowance for loan losses. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, there was 0 provision for loan losses recorded for any of the Company's notes receivable.

1405 Point

On October 15, 2015, the Company agreed to invest up toentered into a note receivable with a maximum principal balance of $28.2 million infor the 1405 Point Street Apartments project in the Harbor Point area of Baltimore, Maryland.Maryland (also known as Point Street Apartments is an estimated $93.0 million development project with plansApartments).

On April 24, 2019, the Company exercised its option to purchase 79% of the interest in the partnership that owns 1405 Point in exchange for a 17-story building comprised of 289 residential units and 18,000 square feet of street-level retail space. Beatty Development Group (“BDG”) is the developer ofextinguishing its note receivable on the project and has engaged the Company to serve as construction general contractor. Point Street Apartments is scheduled to open in 2017; however, management can provide no assurances that Point Street Apartments will open on the anticipated timeline.
BDG secured a senior construction loancash payment of up to $70.0 million to fund the development and construction of Point Street Apartments on November 10, 2016.$0.3 million. The Company has agreed to guarantee $25.0 million of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase up to an 88% controlling interest in Point Street Apartments upon completion ofconsolidated the project as follows: (i) an option to purchase a 79% indirect interest in Point Street Apartments for $27.3 million, exercisable within one year from the project’s completion (the “First Option”) and (ii) provided that the Company has exercised the First Option, an option to purchase an additional 9% indirect interest in Point Street Apartments for $3.1 million, exercisable within 27 months from the project’s completion (the “Second Option”). The Company currently has a $2.1 million letter of credit for the guarantee of the senior construction loan.
The Company’s investment in the Point Street Apartments project is in the form of a loan under which BDG may borrow up to $28.2 million (the “BDG loan”). Interest on the BDG loan accrues at 8.0% per annum and matures on the earlier of: (i) November 1, 2018, which may be extended by BDG under two one-year extension options, (ii) the maturity date or earlier termination of the senior construction loan or (iii) the date the Company exercises the Second Option as described further below.
In the event the Company exercises the First Option, BDG is required to pay down the outstanding BDG loan in full, with the difference between the BDG loan and $28.2 million applied to the senior construction loan . In the event the Company exercises the Second Option, BDG is required to simultaneously repay any remaining amounts outstanding under the BDG loan, with any excess proceeds received from the exercise of the Second Option applied against the senior construction loan. In the event the Company does not exercise either the First Option or the Second Option, the interest rate on the BDG loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan for the remaining term of the BDG loan.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company had funded $20.6 million under the BDG loan andits consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized $1.2 million2019. The project was acquired subject to a loan payable of interest income on the BDG loan.$64.9 million.


Management has concluded that this entity is a VIE. Because BDG is the developer of Point Street Apartments, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance, nor is the Company the party most closely associated with the project. Therefore, the Company is not the project's primary beneficiary.

The Residences at Annapolis Junction


On April 21, 2016, the Company entered into a note receivable with a maximum principal balance of $42.0$48.1 million in the Annapolis Junction residential component of the Annapolis Junction Town Center project in Maryland (“("Annapolis Junction”Junction"). Annapolis Junction is an estimated $102.0 millionapartment development project with 416 residential units. It is part of a mixed-use development project with plans for 416 residential units,that is also planned to have 17,000 square feet of retail space and a 150-room hotel. Annapolis Junction Apartments Owner, LLC (“AJAO”("AJAO") is the developer of the residential component and has engaged the Company to serve as construction general contractor for the residential component. Annapolis Junction opened during 2017 and 2018 and is scheduled to opencurrently in 2017; however, management can provide no assurances that Annapolis Junction will open on the anticipated timeline or at the anticipated cost.lease-up.
 
AJAO secured a senior construction loan of up to $60.0 million to fund the development and construction of Annapolis Junction's residential component on September 30, 2016. The Company has agreed to guarantee up to $25.0 million of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase up to an 88% controlling interest in Annapolis Junction upon completion of the project as follows: (i) an option to purchase an 80% indirect interest in Annapolis Junction's residential component for 91% of the lesser of the seller’s budgeted or actual cost, exercisable within one year from the project’s completion (the “First Option”"First Option") and (ii) provided that the Company has exercised the First

Option, an option to purchase an additional 8% indirect interest in Annapolis Junction for 9% of the lesser of the seller’s actual or budgeted cost, exercisable within 27 months from the project’s completion (the “Second Option”).
The Company’s investment in the Annapolis Junction project is in the form of a loan under which AJAO may borrow up to $48.0 million, including a $6.0 million interest reserve (the “AJAO loan”"Second Option"). Interest on the AJAO loan accrues at 10.0% per annum and matures onannum.

On November 16, 2018, AJAO refinanced the earlier of: (i) December 21, 2020, which may be extended by AJAO undersenior construction loan with a one year senior loan of $83.0 million. This senior loan includes two one-yearsix-month extension options (ii)subject to minimum debt yields and minimum debt service coverage ratios. Concurrent with the maturity date or earlier terminationrefinancing of the senior construction loan, or (iii) the date the Company exercisesagreed to modify the Second Optionmezzanine loan receivable with AJAO as described further below. Infollows:

•The Company agreed to guarantee $8.3 million of the eventnew senior loan;
•The Company agreed to extend the maturity of the mezzanine loan, which will mature concurrently with the new senior loan;
•The Company terminated its rights under the purchase options;
•AJAO paid a modification fee of $5.0 million;
•AJAO will pay an exit fee of $3.0 million upon full repayment of the loan; and
•AJAO paid down $11.1 million of the outstanding mezzanine loan balance, which was comprised of a $9.9 million payment of accrued interest and a $1.2 million payment of principal.

The fee of $5.0 million paid by AJAO was accounted for as a loan discount that was recognized as interest income over the Company exercisesone year loan term from November 2018 to November 2019 using the First Option, AJAO is required to simultaneously pay down botheffective interest method. On December 1, 2019, the first six-month extension option for the senior construction loan was exercised, and the Company's mezzanine loan was extended in tandem. AJAO loan by 80%, at which time the interest rate on the AJAO loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan. In the event the Company exercises the Second Option, AJAO is required to simultaneously repay any remaining amounts outstanding under the AJAO loan, with any excess proceeds received from the exercisepay an exit fee of $3.0 million upon full repayment of the Second Option applied againstloan, which is being recognized through the remaining balance of the senior construction loan. In the event that the Company does not exercise either the First Option or the Second Option, the interest rate on the AJAO loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan for thecurrent remaining term of the AJAO loan. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized $2.0 million ofloan as interest income onusing the note. No portion of the note receivable balance is past due and the Company has not recorded an impairment balance on the note.effective interest method.

The balance on the Annapolis Junction note was $38.9 million as of December 31, 2016.


Management has concluded that this entity is a VIE. Because AJAO is the developer of Point Street Apartments,Annapolis Junction, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance, nor is the Company the party most closely associated with the project.performance. Therefore, the Company is not the project's primary beneficiary.beneficiary and does not consolidate the project in its consolidated financial statements.

North Decatur Square

On May 15, 2017, the Company invested in the development of an estimated $34.0 million Whole Foods-anchored center located in Decatur, Georgia. The Company's investment was in the form of a mezzanine loan of up to $21.8 million to the developer, North Decatur Square Holdings, LLC ("NDSH"). Interest on the loan had accumulated at a rate of 15.0% per annum. During 2018, this loan was modified to increase the maximum amount of the loan to $29.7 million due to an increase in the square footage of the Whole Foods store.

On July 22, 2019, the borrower paid off the North Decatur Square note receivable in full. The Company received the outstanding principal and interest in the amount of $20.0 million.

Delray Plaza

On October 27, 2017, the Company invested in the development of an estimated $20.0 million Whole Foods-anchored center located in Delray Beach, Florida. The Company's investment was in the form of a mezzanine loan of up to $13.1 million to the developer, Delray Plaza Holdings, LLC ("DPH"). The Company has agreed to guarantee payment of up to $4.8 million of the senior construction loan. On January 8, 2019, this loan was modified to increase the maximum amount of the loan to $15.0 million and the payment guarantee amount increased to $5.2 million. The mezzanine loan bears interest at a rate of 15.0% per annum. The note matures on the earliest of (i) October 27, 2020, (ii) the date of any sale or refinance of the development project, or (iii) the disposition or change in control of the development project.

Management has concluded that this entity is a VIE. Because DPH is the developer of Delray Plaza, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance. Therefore, the Company is not the project's primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the project in its consolidated financial statements.

Nexton Square

On August 31, 2018, the Company financed a $2.2 million bridge loan to SC Summerville Brighton, LLC ("Brighton"), the developer of Nexton Square, a shopping center development project located in Summerville, South Carolina. The shopping center may comprise as many as 16 buildings. On November 7, 2018, the Company increased the maximum loan amount to $4.9 million. This loan was subsequently modified as described below.

On December 4, 2018, the Company entered into a mezzanine loan agreement with Brighton, which provides for a maximum capacity of $17.0 million. The previous loan was repaid from proceeds of the mezzanine loan. This note originally bore interest at a rate of 15% per annum which decreased to 10.0% upon completion of certain portions of the project. The modified note matures on the earliest of (i) December 4, 2020, (ii) the maturity date of the senior construction loan, including any extension options available and exercised under that loan, or (iii) the date of any sale, transfer, or refinancing of the project.

The Company agreed to guarantee 50% of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase the property upon completion according to a predetermined formula, which is primarily dependent upon Brighton's leasing activities and the extent to which Brighton elects to complete all or a portion of the total planned space, if applicable, in response to leasing activities.

On February 8, 2019, Brighton closed on a senior construction loan with a maximum borrowing capacity of $25.2 million. Brighton used proceeds from its original draw in part to repay $2.1 million of the mezzanine loan. Upon the closing of this senior construction loan, the Company entered into a payment guarantee for $12.6 million of the senior loan.

Management has concluded that this entity is a VIE. Because Brighton is the developer of Nexton Square, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance. Therefore, the Company is not the project's primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the project in its consolidated financial statements.

Interlock Commercial

In October 2018, the Company financed a bridge loan with a maximum commitment of $4.0 million to The Interlock, LLC ("Interlock"), the developer of the office and retail components of The Interlock, a new mixed-use public-private partnership with Georgia Tech in West Midtown Atlanta. This loan was subsequently modified as described below.

On December 21, 2018, the Company entered into a mezzanine loan agreement with Interlock for a maximum principal amount of $67.0 million and a total maximum commitment, including accrued interest reserves, of $95.0 million. The previous loan was repaid from proceeds of the mezzanine loan. The mezzanine loan bears interest at a rate of 15.0% per annum and matures at the earlier of (i) 24 months after the original maturity date or earlier termination date of the senior construction loan or (ii) any sale, transfer, or refinancing of the project. In the event that the maturity date is established as being 24 months after the original maturity date or earlier termination date of the senior construction loan, Interlock will have the right to extend the maturity date for 5 years.

On April 19, 2019, the borrower executed its senior construction loan, and the Company's payment guarantee of up to $30.7 million became effective. See Note 15 for additional information. See Note 18 for additional discussion.

Management has concluded that this entity is a VIE. Because Interlock is the developer of The Interlock, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance. Therefore, the Company is not the project's primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the project in its consolidated financial statements.


Solis Apartments at Interlock

On December 21, 2018, the Company entered into a mezzanine loan agreement with Interlock Mezz Borrower, LLC ("Solis Interlock"), the developer of Solis Apartments at Interlock, which is the apartment component of The Interlock. The mezzanine loan has a maximum principal commitment of $25.2 million and a total maximum commitment, including accrued interest reserves, of $41.1 million. The mezzanine loan bears interest at a rate of 13.0% per annum and matures on the earlier of (a) the later of (i) December 21, 2021 or (ii) the maturity date or earlier termination date of the senior construction loan, including any extensions of the senior construction loan, or (b) the date of any sale of the project or refinance of the loan.

Management has concluded that this entity is a VIE. Because Solis Interlock is the developer of Solis Apartments at Interlock, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance. Therefore, the Company is not the project's primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the project in its consolidated financial statements.

Guarantee liabilities

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had outstanding payment guarantees for the senior loans on Residences at Annapolis Junction, Delray Plaza, Nexton Square, and Interlock Commercial as described above. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company has recorded a guarantee liability of $5.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively, representing their unamortized fair value. These guarantees are classified as other liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheets, with a corresponding adjustment to the notes receivable balance on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 18 for additional information on the Company's outstanding guarantees.

7.Construction Contracts
 
Construction contract costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings represent reimbursable costs and amounts earned under contracts in progress as of the balance sheet date. Such amounts become billable according to contract terms, which usually consider the passage of time, achievement of certain milestones, or completion of the project. Billings of $13.5 million and $19.2 million were netted against construction contract costs and estimated earnings as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company expects to bill and collect substantially all construction contract costs incurredand estimated earnings in excess of billings as of December 31, 20162019 during the year ending December 31, 2017.2020.  
The Company defers precontract costs when such costs are directly associated with specific anticipated contracts and their recovery is probable. Precontract costs of $1.5 million and $0.5 million were deferred as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Billings in excess of construction contract costs and estimated earnings represent billings or collections on contracts made in advance of revenue recognized.

The following table summarizes the changes to the balances in the Company’s construction contract costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings account and the billings in excess of construction contract costs and estimated earnings account for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

  Year ended December 31, 2019 Year ended December 31, 2018
  Construction contract costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings Billings in excess of construction contract costs and estimated earnings Construction contract costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings Billings in excess of construction contract costs and estimated earnings
Beginning balance $1,358
 $3,037
 $245
 $3,591
Revenue recognized that was included in the balance at the beginning of the period —
 (3,037) —
 (3,591)
Increases due to new billings, excluding amounts recognized as revenue during the period —
 6,283
 —
 4,243
Transferred to receivables (2,557) —
 (245) —
Construction contract costs and estimated earnings not billed during the period 249
 —
 352
 —
Changes due to cumulative catch-up adjustment arising from changes in the estimate of the stage of completion 1,199
 (977) 1,006
 (1,206)
Ending balance $249
��$5,306
 $1,358
 $3,037



The Company defers pre-contract costs when such costs are directly associated with specific anticipated contracts and their recovery is probable. Pre-contract costs of $0.9 million and $1.4 million were deferred as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Amortization of pre-contract costs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $0.6 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively.
 
Construction receivables and payables include retentions—amounts that are generally withheld until the completion of the contract or the satisfaction of certain restrictive conditions such as fulfillment guarantees. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, construction receivables included retentions of $11.5$9.0 million and $10.8$8.5 million, respectively. The Company expects to collect substantially all construction receivables as of December 31, 20162019 during the year ending December 31, 2017.2020. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, construction payables included retentions of $14.6$18.0 million and $12.3$21.6 million, respectively. The Company expects to pay substantially all construction payables as of December 31, 20162019 during the year ending December 31, 2017.2020.


The Company’s net position on uncompleted construction contracts comprised the following as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):
 
December 31, December 31, 
2016 20152019 2018
Costs incurred on uncompleted construction contracts$333,744
 $228,184
$695,564
 $594,006
Estimated earnings10,936
 9,739
24,553
 20,375
Billings(354,737) (240,059)(725,174) (616,060)
Net position$(10,057) $(2,136)$(5,057) $(1,679)
   
Construction contract costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings$249
 $1,358
Billings in excess of construction contract costs and estimated earnings(5,306) (3,037)
Net position$(5,057) $(1,679)
 
The Company's balances and changes in construction contract price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations (backlog) for each of the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in thousands):
 December 31,
 2016 2015
Construction contract costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings$110
 $88
Billings in excess of construction contract costs and estimated earnings(10,167) (2,224)
Net position$(10,057) $(2,136)
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Beginning backlog$165,863
 $49,167
 $217,718
New contracts/change orders182,495
 192,852
 25,224
Work performed(105,736) (76,156) (193,775)
Ending backlog$242,622
 $165,863
 $49,167


The Company expects to complete alla majority of the uncompleted contracts as of December 31, 20162019 during the years ending December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019.next 12 to 18 months.  



8.Indebtedness

The Company’s indebtedness was comprised of the following as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (dollars in thousands):  
   Stated Interest Stated Maturity
 Principal Balance Rate Date
 December 31,  December 31, 
 2016 2015 2016
249 Central Park Retail (1)
$17,076
 $15,282
 LIBOR + 1.95%
 August 8, 2021
Fountain Plaza Retail (1)
10,281
 7,641
 LIBOR + 1.95%
 August 8, 2021
South Retail (1)
7,493
 6,742
 LIBOR + 1.95%
 August 8, 2021
4525 Main Street (2)
32,034
 31,613
 3.25% September 10, 2021
Encore Apartments (2)
24,966
 25,184
 3.25% September 10, 2021
North Point Center Note 5 (3)
643
 664
 LIBOR + 2.00%
 February 1, 2017
Oyster Point—
 6,400
 LIBOR+1.40%-2.00%
 February 28, 2017
Harrisonburg Regal3,256
 3,463
 6.06% June 8, 2017
Commonwealth of Virginia - Chesapeake4,933
 4,933
 LIBOR + 1.90%
 August 28, 2017
Hanbury Village Note 120,709
 20,970
 6.67% October 11, 2017
Lightfoot Marketplace12,194
 7,759
 LIBOR + 1.90%
 November 14, 2017
Sandbridge Commons9,376
 9,010
 LIBOR + 1.85%
 January 17, 2018
Southgate Square21,150
 —
 LIBOR + 2.00%
 April 29, 2021
Columbus Village Note 1 (3)
6,258
 6,429
 LIBOR + 2.00%
 April 5, 2018
Columbus Village Note 22,266
 2,310
 LIBOR + 2.00%
 April 5, 2018
Johns Hopkins Village43,841
 3,968
 LIBOR + 1.90%
 July 30, 2018
North Point Center Note 19,776
 9,969
 6.45% February 5, 2019
Revolving credit facility107,000
 74,000
 LIBOR+1.40%-2.00%
 February 20, 2019
Term loan(3)50,000
 50,000
 LIBOR+1.35%-1.95%
 February 20, 2020
Term loan50,000
 —
 LIBOR+1.35%-1.95%
 February 20, 2020
Socastee Commons4,866
 4,957
 4.57% January 6, 2023
North Point Center Note 22,564
 2,662
 7.25% September 15, 2025
Smith's Landing20,511
 21,226
 4.05% June 1, 2035
Liberty Apartments20,005
 20,312
 5.66% November 1, 2043
The Cosmopolitan45,884
 46,519
 3.75% July 1, 2051
Total principal balance$527,082
 $382,013
    
Unamortized fair value adjustments(1,250) (1,287)    
Unamortized debt issuance costs(3,652) (3,133)    
Indebtedness, net$522,180
 $377,593
    
 Principal Balance 
Interest Rate (a)
 Maturity Date
 December 31,  December 31, 
 2019 2018 2019
Secured Debt       
North Point Center Note 1 (b)
$—
 $9,352
 6.45% February 5, 2019
Lightfoot Marketplace (c)
—
 10,500
 LIBOR + 1.75%
 October 12, 2023
Hoffler Place (d)
29,059
 11,445
 LIBOR + 3.24%
 January 1, 2021
Summit Place (d)
28,824
 11,057
 LIBOR + 3.24%
 January 1, 2021
Southgate Square20,562
 21,442
 LIBOR + 1.60%
 April 29, 2021
Encore Apartments (e)
24,842
 24,966
 3.25% September 10, 2021
4525 Main Street (e)
31,876
 32,034
 3.25% September 10, 2021
Red Mill West11,296
 —
 4.23% June 1, 2022
Thames Street Wharf70,000
 —
 LIBOR + 1.30%
 June 26, 2022
Hanbury Village18,515
 19,019
 3.78% August 15, 2022
Marketplace at Hilltop10,517
 —
 4.42% October 1, 2022
1405 Point53,000
 —
 LIBOR + 2.25%
 January 1, 2023
Socastee Commons4,567
 4,671
 4.57% January 6, 2023
Sandbridge Commons8,020
 8,258
 LIBOR + 1.75%
 January 17, 2023
Wills Wharf29,154
 —
 LIBOR + 2.25%
 June 26, 2023
249 Central Park Retail (f)
16,828
 17,045
 LIBOR + 1.60%
(g) 
August 10, 2023
Fountain Plaza Retail (f)
10,127
 10,257
 LIBOR + 1.60%
(g) 
August 10, 2023
South Retail (f)
7,388
 7,483
 LIBOR + 1.60%
(g) 
August 10, 2023
One City Center25,286
 —
 LIBOR + 1.85%
 April 1, 2024
Red Mill Central2,538
 —
 4.80% June 17, 2024
Premier Apartments (h)
16,750
 12,873
 LIBOR + 1.55%
 October 31, 2024
Premier Retail (h)
8,250
 6,341
 LIBOR + 1.55%
 October 31, 2024
Red Mill South6,137
 —
 3.57% May 1, 2025
Brooks Crossing Office14,411
 6,910
 LIBOR + 1.60%
 July 1, 2025
Market at Mill Creek14,727
 7,283
 LIBOR + 1.55%
 July 12, 2025
Johns Hopkins Village51,800
 52,708
 LIBOR + 1.25%
(g) 
August 7, 2025
North Point Center Note 22,214
 2,346
 7.25% September 15, 2025
Lexington Square14,696
 14,940
 4.50% September 1, 2028
Red Mill North4,394
 —
 4.73% December 31, 2028
Greenside Apartments34,000
 25,902
 3.17% December 15, 2029
Smith's Landing18,174
 18,985
 4.05% June 1, 2035
Liberty Apartments14,165
 14,437
 5.66% November 1, 2043
The Cosmopolitan43,702
 44,468
 3.35% July 1, 2051
Total secured debt$645,819
 $394,722
    
Unsecured Debt       
Senior unsecured revolving credit facility110,000
 126,000
 LIBOR+1.30%-1.85%
 January 24, 2024
Senior unsecured term loan44,500
 80,000
 LIBOR+1.25%-1.80%
 January 24, 2025
Senior unsecured term loan160,500
 100,000
 LIBOR+1.25%-1.80%
(g) 
January 24, 2025
Total unsecured debt$315,000
 $306,000
    
Total principal balances$960,819
 $700,722
    
Unamortized fair value adjustments(878) (1,173)    
Unamortized debt issuance costs(9,404) (5,310)    
Indebtedness, net$950,537
 $694,239
    

________________________________________
(1)Cross collateralized.
(2)Cross collateralized.
(3)Subject to an interest rate swap agreement. 
(a) LIBOR rate is determined by individual lenders.
(b) On January 31, 2019, North Point Note 1 was paid off.
(c) On August 15, 2019, Lightfoot Note was paid off upon the sale of the property.
(d) Cross collateralized.


(e) Cross collateralized.
(f) Cross collateralized.
(g) Includes debt subject to interest rate swap agreements.
(h) Cross collateralized.

The Company’s indebtedness was comprised of the following fixed and variable-rate debt as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):
 December 31, 
 2019 2018
Fixed-rate debt$488,276
 $348,426
Variable-rate debt472,543
 352,296
Total principal balance$960,819
 $700,722
 December 31, 
 2016 2015
Fixed-rate debt$241,472
 $159,743
Variable-rate debt285,610
 222,270
Total principal balance$527,082
 $382,013

 
Certain loans require the Company to comply with various financial and other covenants, including the maintenance of minimum debt coverage ratios. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company was in compliance with all loan covenants.
 
Scheduled principal repayments and term-loan maturities during each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31, Scheduled Principal Payments Maturities Total Payments
2020 $10,191
 $—
 $10,191
2021 10,914
 132,124
 143,038
2022 9,683
 106,691
 116,374
2023 7,752
 124,677
 132,429
2024 6,982
 157,978
 164,960
Thereafter 72,749
 321,078
 393,827
Total $118,271
 $842,548
 $960,819

YearScheduled Principal Payments Term-Loan Maturities Total Payments
2017$3,778
 $41,432
 $45,210
20183,655
 60,873
 64,528
20193,485
 116,333
 119,818
20204,482
 100,000
 104,482
20213,588
 106,274
 109,862
Thereafter77,615
 5,567
 83,182
Total$96,603
 $430,479
 $527,082


Credit Facility
 
On February 20, 2015,October 3, 2019, the Operating Partnership as borrower, and the Company, as parent guarantor, entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the "credit agreement"), which provides for a $200.0$355.0 million senior unsecured credit facility that includescomprised of a $150.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the "revolving credit facility") and a $50.0$205.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility. facility (the "term loan facility" and, together with the revolving credit facility, the "credit facility"), with a syndicate of banks. The amended credit facility replaces the prior $150.0 million revolving credit facility, which was scheduled to mature on October 26, 2021, and the prior $205.0 million term loan facility, which was scheduled to mature on October 26, 2022.

The credit facility includes an accordion feature that allows the total commitments to be increased to $350.0$700.0 million, subject to certain conditions. On January 5, 2016 and March 31, 2016, the Company increased the total borrowing capacity to $225.0 million and $250.0 million, respectively.conditions, including obtaining commitments from any one or more lenders. The credit facility replaced the prior $155.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility that washas a scheduled maturity date of January 24, 2024, with 2 six-month extension options, subject to mature on May 13, 2016.certain conditions, including payment of a 0.075% extension fee at each extension. The term loan facility has a scheduled maturity date of January 24, 2025.


Depending on the Operating Partnership’s total leverage, theThe revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR (the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) plus 1.40%a margin ranging from 1.30% to 2.00%1.85%, and the term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35%a margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.95%.1.80%, in each case depending on the Company's total leverage. The Company is also obligated to pay an unused commitment fee of 15 or 25 basis points on the unused portions of the commitments under the revolving credit facility, depending on the amount of borrowings under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the interest rates on the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility were 2.32%3.26% and 2.27%3.21%, respectively. If the Company attains investment grade credit ratings from S&P and Moody’s, the Operating Partnership may elect to have borrowings become subject to interest rates based on such credit ratings.

The Operating Partnership is also obligated to pay an unused commitment fee of 15 or 25 basis points on the unused portions of the commitments under the credit facility, depending on the amount of borrowings under the new credit facility.
The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2019, with a one-year extension option, subject to certain conditions, and the term loan facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2020. The Operating PartnershipCompany may, at any time, voluntarily prepay any loan under the credit facility in whole or in part without a material premium or penalty.

The amount permitted to be borrowedOperating Partnership is the borrower under the new credit facility, together with alland its obligations under the credit facility are guaranteed by the Company and certain of the Operating Partnership’s other unsecured indebtedness is generally limited to the lesser of: (i) 60% of the value of the unencumbered borrowingits subsidiaries that are not otherwise prohibited from providing such

base properties, (ii) the maximum amount of principal that would result in a debt service coverage ratio of 1.50 to 1.0, and (iii) the maximum aggregate loan commitment, which was $250.0 million as of December 31, 2016.  

guaranty. The credit agreement contains customary representations and warranties and financial and other affirmative and negative covenants. The Company's ability to borrow under the credit facility requires the Operating Partnershipis subject to complyongoing compliance with variousa number of financial covenants, affirmative covenants, and other restrictions, includingrestrictions. The credit agreement includes customary events of default, in certain cases subject to customary cure periods. The occurrence of an event of default, if not cured within the following:applicable cure period, would permit the lenders to, among other things, declare the unpaid principal, accrued and unpaid interest, and all other amounts payable under the credit facility to be immediately due and payable.

Total leverage ratioThe Company is currently in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement.

Other 2019 Financing Activity

On January 31, 2019, the Company paid off North Point Center Note 1.

On March 11, 2019, the Company received $7.4 million of additional funding on the loan secured by Lightfoot Marketplace. On August 15, 2019, the Company sold the property and paid off the outstanding balance of $17.9 million. The Company retained the interest rate swap associated with the loan.

On March 14, 2019, the Company obtained a loan secured by One City Center in the amount of $25.6 million in conjunction with the acquisition of this property. This loan may be increased to $27.6 million subject to certain conditions. The loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.85% and will mature on April 1, 2024.

On April 24, 2019, the Company exercised its option to purchase 79% of the partnership that owns 1405 Point in exchange for extinguishing its note receivable on the project and a cash payment of $0.3 million. The project was acquired subject to a loan payable of $64.9 million, which was recorded at its fair value of $65.8 million. On December 27, 2019, the Company extended and modified the 1405 Point loan. The Company decreased the balance on the loan to $53.0 million by paying the balance of not more than 60% (or 65% for the two consecutive quarters following any acquisition that is equal$12.3 million. The loan matures on January 1, 2023 and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 2.25%; this spread will decrease to or greater than 10%2.00% upon achieving Debt Yield of our total asset value8.5% and further to 1.75% upon achieving Debt Yield of 9.5% (as defined in the loan agreement).

On May 23, 2019, the Company assumed notes payable in connection with the acquisition of Red Mill Commons and Marketplace at Hilltop with outstanding principal balances of $24.9 million and $10.8 million, respectively. The following table summarizes the note balance at assumption, fair value at assumption, maturity date, and interest rate for each loan ($ in thousands):
Loan name Note balance at assumption Fair value of loan at assumption Loan maturity date Loan interest rate
Red Mill North $4,451
 $4,520
 12/31/2028 4.73%
Red Mill South 6,310
 6,090
 5/1/2025 3.57%
Red Mill Central 2,640
 2,690
 6/17/2024 4.80%
Red Mill West 11,548
 11,540
 6/1/2022 4.23%
Marketplace at Hilltop 10,740
 10,790
 10/1/2022 4.42%
  $35,689
 $35,630
    


On June 26, 2019, the Company obtained a loan secured by Thames Street Wharf in the amount of $70.0 million in conjunction with the acquisition of this property. The loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.30% and will mature on June 26, 2022.

On June 26, 2019, the Company entered into a $76.0 million syndicated construction loan facility for the Wills Wharf development project in Baltimore, Maryland. The facility bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 2.25% during construction activities and will mature on June 26, 2023.

On October 29, 2019, the Company extended and modified the Premier loan. The Company increased the balance on the loan to $25.0 million by receiving additional proceeds of $2.7 million. The loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.55% and will mature on October 31, 2024.


On December 12, 2019, the Company refinanced the Greenside loan. The Company increased the balance to $34.0 million by receiving additional proceeds of $5.1 million. The loan bears interest at a rate of 3.17% and will mature on December 15, 2029.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company borrowed $96.3 million under its construction loans to fund development and construction.

Subsequent to December 31, 2019

Borrowings under the revolving credit agreement), but only upfacility were $130.0 million on February 20, 2020.
Other 2018 Financing Activity

On January 22, 2018, the Company extended and modified the Sandbridge Commons note. The note bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.75% and will mature on January 17, 2023.

On March 27, 2018, the Company paid off Columbus Village Note 1 and Columbus Village Note 2 in full for an aggregate amount of $8.3 million.

On May 31, 2018, the Company modified the Southgate Square note. The principal amount of the note was increased to two times during$22.0 million, and the note now bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.60%. This note will still mature on April 29, 2021.

On June 1, 2018, the Company entered into a $16.3 million construction loan for the River City industrial facility in Chesterfield, Virginia. The loan bore interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.50%. On December 20, 2018, the Company sold the completed facility and paid the loan in full.

On June 14, 2018, the Company extended and modified the note secured by 249 Central Park Retail, Fountain Plaza Retail, and South Retail. The principal amount of the note was increased to $35.0 million. The note bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.60% and will mature on August 10, 2023.

On June 29, 2018, the Company entered into a $15.6 million construction loan for the Brooks Crossing Office development project. The loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.60% and will mature on July 1, 2025.

On July 12, 2018, the Company entered into a $16.2 million construction loan for the Market at Mill Creek development project in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. The loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.55% and will mature on July 12, 2025.

On July 27, 2018, the Company paid off the Johns Hopkins Village note and entered into a new loan. The principal amount of the new loan is $53.0 million. The loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.25% and will mature on August 7, 2025. The Company simultaneously entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixes the interest rate at 4.19% for the term of the credit facility);loan.
Ratio
On August 28, 2018, the Company entered into a $15.0 million note secured by the newly acquired Lexington Square shopping center. The note bears interest at a rate of adjusted EBITDA to4.50% and will mature on September 1, 2028.

On October 12, 2018, the Company extended and modified the note secured by Lightfoot Marketplace. The Company borrowed an initial tranche of $10.5 million on this note, which bore interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread of 1.75%. The Company simultaneously entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixed chargesthe interest rate of the initial tranche at 4.77% per annum. On March 11, 2019, the Company received $7.4 million of not less than 1.50 to 1.0;
Tangible net worth of not less thanadditional funding under this note. On August 15, 2019, the sum of $220.0Company paid off the $17.9 million and 75%outstanding balance of the net equity proceeds received afternote in conjunction with the sale of the property.

During the year ended December 31, 2014;  
Ratio of variable rate indebtedness to total asset value of not more than 30%;  
Ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value of not more than 45%; and
Ratio of secured recourse debt to total asset value of not more than 25%.  
The credit facility limits the Company’s ability to pay cash dividends. However, so long as no default or event of default exists, the credit agreement allows2018, the Company borrowed $86.9 million under its existing construction loans to pay cash dividendsfund new development and construction and repaid $10.5 million in conjunction with respect to any 12-month period in an amount not to exceed the greater of: (i) 95% of adjusted funds from operations (as defined in the credit agreement) or (ii) the amount required for the Company (a) to maintain its status as a REIT and (b) to avoid income or excise tax. If certain defaults or events of default exist, the Company may pay cash dividends with respect to any 12-month period to the extent necessary to maintain its status as a REIT. The credit facility also restricts the amount of capital that the Operating Partnership can invest in specific categories of assets, such as unimproved land holdings, development properties, notes receivable, mortgages, mezzanine loans and unconsolidated affiliates.
Subsequent to December 31, 2016
On February 1, 2017, the Company increased the borrowings under the senior unsecured term loan facility to $125.0 million and increased the total capacitysale of the senior unsecured credit facility to $275.0 million, pursuant to the accordion feature of the creditRiver City industrial facility.


Other 2017 Financing Activity

On February 1, 2017, the Company paid off the North Point Center Note 5 in full.full for $0.6 million.


On February 24, 2017, the Company secured a $29.8 million construction loan for the Harding PlaceGreenside project in Charlotte, North Carolina.


Other 2016 Financing ActivityOn April 7, 2017, the Company paid off the Harrisonburg Regal note in full for $3.2 million.

On April 19, 2017, the Company entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement for the Lightfoot Marketplace loan, which amended certain definitions and covenant requirements.

On June 29, 2017, the Company secured a $27.9 million construction loan for the Premier Apartments project in Virginia Beach, Virginia.

On July 13, 2017, the Company paid off the remaining balance of $4.9 million for the note secured by the Commonwealth of Virginia building in Chesapeake, Virginia in conjunction with the sale of this property.

On August 8, 2016,9, 2017, the Company repaidrefinanced the existing $15.1 million mortgage loan secured by 249 Central Park Retail, the $6.7 million mortgage loan on South Retail and the $7.6 million mortgage loan on Fountain Plaza and refinanced them with a $35.0 million five-year term mortgage loan that bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.95% and matures on August 8, 2021.Hanbury Village note. The new mortgage loan is collateralized by all three properties. The loss on extinguishmentnote matures in August 2022 and has a fixed annual interest rate of debt recognized on the refinancing was less than $0.1 million.3.78%.


On August 30, 2016,10, 2017, the Company repaidpaid off $0.7 million of the existing $31.6Sandbridge Commons note in conjunction with the sale of a land outparcel at this property.

On September 1, 2017, the Company entered into a modification of The Cosmopolitan note, which reduced the interest rate from 3.75% to 3.35%.

On October 13, 2017, the Company paid down $5.0 million of the Liberty Apartments note.

On November 1, 2017, the Company extended the Lightfoot construction loan after paying the balance down to $10.5 million and paying an extension fee.

On December 28, 2017, the Company secured a $66.5 million construction loan secured by 4525 Mainfor the 595 King Street and the $25.2 million construction loan on Encore Apartments and refinanced them with a $57.0 million five-year term mortgage loan that bears interest at 3.25% and matures on September 10, 2021. The new mortgage is collateralized by both properties. The loss on extinguishment of debt recognized on the refinancing was less than $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.530 Meeting Street development projects.


During the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, the Company borrowed $44.4$8.9 million under its construction loans to fund new development and construction.


Other 2015 Financing Activity
On May 20, 2015, the Company repaid the $17.8 million construction loan secured by Whetstone Apartments and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.1 million representing unamortized debt issuance costs.
On May 27, 2015, the Company repaid the existing $24.4 million mortgage secured by Smith’s Landing and refinanced the property with a new $21.6 million loan that bears interest at 4.05% and matures on June 1, 2035. As a result of the refinancing, the Company recognized a $0.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt representing the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the repaid mortgage.

On July 1, 2015, the Company assumed debt with an outstanding principal balance of $5.0 million in connection with the acquisition of Socastee Commons. The mortgage bears interest at 4.57% and matures on January 6, 2023.
On July 10, 2015, the Company assumed two loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $8.8 million in connection with the acquisition of Columbus Village. Both loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.00% and mature on April 5, 2018.
On July 30, 2015, the Company entered into a $50.0 million loan agreement to fund the development and construction of Johns Hopkins Village. The construction loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.90% and matures on July 30, 2018.
On September 1, 2015, the Company repaid the $6.1 million mortgage secured by the Oyster Point office building.
On October 6, 2015, the Operating Partnership entered into a $6.4 million note secured by the Oyster Point office building, which bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.40% to 2.00% and matures on February 28, 2017. This note was paid in full in conjunction with the sale of the Oyster Point office building.
On October 30, 2015, the Company repaid the $18.7 million construction loan secured by the Oceaneering International building and recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of debt of $0.1 million representing unamortized debt issuance costs.
Other 2014 Financing Activity
On January 17, 2014, the Company assumed $17.0 million of debt at fair value in connection with the acquisition of Liberty Apartments. The fair value adjustment to the assumed debt of Liberty Apartments was a $1.5 million discount. The outstanding principal balance of the assumed debt of Liberty Apartments at the acquisition date was $18.5 million. On June 13, 2014, the Company borrowed the remaining $2.4 million available under the Liberty Apartments loan. The loan amortizes over 30 years, bears interest at 5.66% and matures on November 1, 2043.  
On February 28, 2014, the Company closed on a $19.5 million loan to fund the development and construction of the Oceaneering International facility. The construction loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% and matures on February 28, 2018.  
On August 15, 2014, the Company defeased the loan secured by Dimmock Square for $10.1 million.  
On August 28, 2014, the Company closed on a $5.4 million loan to fund the development and construction of a new administrative building for the Commonwealth of Virginia. The construction loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.90% and matures on August 28, 2017.  
On November 3, 2014, the Company repaid North Point Center Note 4 for $1.0 million.
On November 14, 2014, the Company closed on a $15.0 million loan to fund the development and construction of Lightfoot Marketplace. The construction loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.90% and matures on November 14, 2017.  
9.Derivative Financial Instruments
 
On February 20, 2015,During the Operating Partnership entered into a $50.0 millionthree years ended December 31, 2019, the Company had the following LIBOR interest rate caps, which are not designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes ($ in thousands):
Origination Date Expiration Date Notional Amount  Strike Rate Premium Paid
10/26/2015 10/15/2017 $75,000
 1.25% $137
2/25/2016 3/1/2018 75,000
 1.50% 57
6/17/2016 6/17/2018 70,000
 1.00% 150
2/7/2017 3/1/2019 50,000
 1.50% 187
6/23/2017 7/1/2019 50,000
 1.50% 154
9/18/2017 10/1/2019 50,000
 1.50% 199
11/28/2017 12/1/2019 50,000
 1.50% 359
3/7/2018 4/1/2020 50,000
 2.25% 310
7/16/2018 8/1/2020 50,000
 2.50% 319
12/11/2018 1/1/2021 50,000
 2.75% 210
5/15/2019 6/1/2022 100,000
 2.50% 288
        $2,370


As of December 31, 2019, the Company held the following floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $50.0 millionswaps ($ in thousands):
Related Debt Notional Amount  Index Swap Fixed Rate Debt effective rate Effective Date Expiration Date
Senior unsecured term loan $50,000
  1-month LIBOR 2.00% 3.45% 3/1/2016 2/20/2020
Senior unsecured term loan 50,000
  1-month LIBOR 2.78% 4.23% 5/1/2018 5/1/2023
John Hopkins Village 51,800
(a) 
 1-month LIBOR 2.94% 4.19% 8/7/2018 8/7/2025
Senior unsecured term loan 10,500
(a)(b) 
 1-month LIBOR 3.02% 4.47% 10/12/2018 10/12/2023
249 Central Park Retail, South Retail, and Fountain Plaza Retail 34,342
(a) 
 1-month LIBOR 2.25% 3.85% 4/1/2019 8/10/2023
Senior unsecured term loan 50,000
(a) 
 1-month LIBOR 2.26% 3.71% 4/1/2019 10/26/2022
Total $246,642
           

(a) Designated as a cash flow hedge.
(b) Prior to August 15, 2019, this swap was used as a hedge for the cash flows for the loan secured by Lightfoot Marketplace.


For the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges, realized losses are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income due to payments made to the swap has a fixed ratecounterparty. During the next 12 months, the Company anticipates reclassifying approximately $1.4 million of 2.00%, an effective datenet hedging losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings to offset the variability of March 1, 2016 and a maturity date of February 20, 2020. The Operating Partnershipthe hedged items during this period.


entered into this interest rate swap agreement in connection withThe Company’s derivatives comprised the $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility that bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%, depending on the Operating Partnership’s total leverage. The Company designated this interest rate swapfollowing as a cash flow hedge of variable interest payments based on one-month LIBOR.December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

  December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
    Fair Value   Fair Value
  Notional Amount Asset Liability Notional Amount Asset Liability
Derivatives not designated as accounting hedges            
Interest rate swaps $100,000
 $—
 $(1,992) $100,000
 $303
 $(749)
Interest rate caps 250,000
 25
 —
 350,000
 1,790
 —
Total derivatives not designated as accounting hedges 350,000
 25
 (1,992) 450,000
 2,093
 (749)
Derivatives designated as accounting hedges            
Interest rate swaps 146,642
 —
 (5,728) 63,208
 —
 (1,725)
Total derivatives $496,642
 $25
 $(7,720) $513,208
 $2,093
 $(2,474)
On July 13, 2015, the Operating Partnership entered into a $6.5 million floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $6.5 million interest rate swap has a fixed rate of 3.05%, an effective date of July 13, 2015 and a maturity date of April 5, 2018. The Company designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of variable interest payments based on one-month LIBOR.
 
On October 26, 2015,The changes in the Operating Partnership entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amountfair value of $75.0 million at a strike rate of 1.25% for a premium of $0.1 million. The interest rate cap agreement expires on October 15, 2017.the Company’s derivatives during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Interest rate swaps$(6,050) $(2,281) $770
Interest rate caps(2,053) (564) 357
Total change in fair value of interest rate derivatives$(8,103) $(2,845) $1,127
Comprehensive income statement presentation: 
  
  
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives$(3,599) $(951) $1,127
Unrealized cash flow hedge losses(4,504) (1,894) —
Total change in fair value of interest rate derivatives$(8,103) $(2,845) $1,127


Subsequent to December 31, 2019

On February 25, 2016,January 10, 2020, the Operating Partnership entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $75.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50% for a premium of less than $0.1 million.  The interest rate cap agreement expires on March 1, 2018.

On June 17, 2016, the Operating Partnership entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $70.0 million at a strike rate of 1.00% for a premium of less than $0.1 million. The interest rate cap agreement expires on June 17, 2018.

On March 14, 2014, the Operating PartnershipCompany entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $50.0 million at a strike rate of 1.25%1.75% for a premium of $0.4$0.1 million. The interest rate cap agreement expireswill expire on MarchFebruary 1, 2017.2022.

The Company’s derivatives comprised the following as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 December 31, 
 2016 2015
 Notional Fair Value Notional Fair Value
 Amount Asset Liability Amount Asset Liability
Interest rate swaps$56,901
 $—
 $(829) $57,093
 $—
 $(1,082)
Interest rate caps270,000
 259
 —
 246,546
 164
 —
Total$326,901
 $259
 $(829) $303,639
 $164
 $(1,082)

The changes in the fair value of the Company’s derivatives during each of the three years ended December 31, 2016 was as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
Interest rate swaps$(795) $(1,071) $5
Interest rate caps(146) (233) (238)
Total$(941) $(1,304) $(233)
Comprehensive income statement presentation: 
  
  
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives$(941) $(229) $(233)
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge—
 (1,075) —
Total$(941) $(1,304) $(233)
Effective March 31, 2016,On January 28, 2020, the Company determined that the short-cut method of hedge accounting was not appropriate for two of its interest-rate swaps and, for accounting purposes, the hedge relationship was terminated. The swaps were entered into in February and July 2015. Accordingly, changes in fair value of the swap should have been recorded in income rather than other comprehensive income. The Company determined that the errors were immaterial to all previously issued financial statements. The Company recognized $0.7 million of accumulated other comprehensive income and $0.4 million, which was previously allocated to noncontrolling interest as of December 31, 2015, in earnings during the first quarter of 2016. Subsequent changes in the value of the interest rate swap for the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 were also recognized in earnings during the year ended December 31, 2016. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2015 was overstated by $1.0 million. In reaching its conclusions, management considered the nature of the error, the effect of the error on operating results for 2015, and the effects of the error on important financial statement measures, including related trends.   

The Company has not designated any of its interest rate caps as hedging instruments under GAAP.
Subsequent to December 31, 2016

On February 1, 2017, the North Point Center Note 5 was paid in full, which terminated the interest rate swap agreement associated with the note. The loss on the interest rate swap agreement was not significant.

On February 7, 2017, the Operating Partnership entered into aan additional LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $50.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50%1.75% for a premium of $0.2$0.1 million. The interest rate cap expiresagreement will expire on MarchFebruary 1, 2019.2022.

10.Equity
 
Stockholders’ Equity
 
As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company’s authorized capital was 500 million shares of common stock and 100 million shares of preferred stock. The Company had 37.556.3 million and 30.150.0 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. NoThe Company had 2.5 million shares of its Series A Preferred Stock (as defined below) issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019. NaN shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.2018.

On April 8, 2015, the Company issued 415,500 shares of common stock in a private placement as partial consideration for the acquisition of Perry Hall Marketplace.
On May 5, 2015, the Company commenced an at-the-market continuous equity program through which the Company may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million (the "Prior ATM Program"). During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 1,108,149 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $10.26 per share. Net proceeds to the Company after offering costs and commissions were $10.9 million.



On May 4, 2016, the Company commenced a newan at-the-market continuous equity offering program (the “2016"2016 ATM Program”Program") through which the Company may,was able to, from time to time, issue and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $75.0 million. Upon commencingDuring the 2016 ATM Program, the Company simultaneously terminated the Prior ATM Program, which the Company entered into in May 2015 and under which,year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 1,152,919450,890 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $10.87 per share, resulting in aggregatenet proceeds after offering costs and commissions of $12.2 million. From the inception date of the 2016 ATM Program through December 31, 2016, the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 4,159,936 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $13.45$14.08 per share under the 2016 ATM Program, receiving net proceeds after offering costs and commissions of $54.8$6.2 million.

On October 13, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Columbus Village II, a stabilized retail asset for aggregate consideration of 2,000,000 shares of common stock, which based on the closing stock price on the date of the acquisition, leads to an acquisition price of $26.2 million. On October 19, 2016, the Company filed a registration statement covering resales of the shares pursuant to a registration rights agreement with the sellers.

On December 9, 2015,May 12, 2017, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 3,450,0006,900,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $13.00 per share, which resulted in net proceeds after offering costs and commissions of $85.3 million.

On February 26, 2018, the Company commenced an at-the-market continuous equity offering program (the "2018 ATM Program") through which the Company may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of its common stock. Upon commencing the 2018 ATM Program, the Company simultaneously terminated the 2016 ATM Program. On August 6, 2019, the Company entered into amendments (the "Amendments") to the separate sales agreements related to the 2018 ATM Program, which, among other things, increased the aggregate offering price of shares of the Company’s common stock under the ATM Program from $125.0 million to $180.7 million. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company issued and sold 5,871,519 and 4,617,409 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $16.76 and $14.39 per share under the 2018 ATM Program, receiving net proceeds after offering costs and commissions of $97.0 million and $65.2 million, respectively.

On June 18, 2019, the Company issued 2,530,000 shares of its 6.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share ("Series A Preferred Stock"), with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, which included 330,000 shares issued upon the underwriters’ full exercise of their option to purchase additional shares. Net proceeds from the offering, after the underwriting discount but before offering expenses payable by the Company, were approximately $61.3 million. The Company used the net proceeds to fund a portion of the Company after deductingpurchase price of Thames Street Wharf, a 263,426 square foot office building located in the underwriting discount and related offering costs were $35.1 million.
On September 15, 2014,Harbor Point neighborhood of Baltimore, Maryland. The balance of the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 5,750,000 shares of common stock. The net proceeds was used to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

In connection with the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, on June 18, 2019, the Operating Partnership issued to the Company 2,530,000 6.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Units (the "Series A Preferred Units"), which have economic terms that are identical to the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Units were issued in exchange for the Company’s contribution of the net proceeds from the offering of the Series A Preferred Stock to the Operating Partnership.

Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in arrears on or about the 15th day of each January, April, July and October. The first dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock was paid on October 15, 2019. The Series A Preferred Stock does not have a stated maturity date and is not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption provisions. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the Series A Preferred Stock will rank senior to the Company's common stock with respect to the payment of distributions and other amounts. Except in instances relating to preservation of the Company's qualification as a REIT or pursuant to the Company’s special optional redemption right, the Series A Preferred Stock is not redeemable prior to June 18, 2024. On and after deductingJune 18, 2024, the underwriting discountCompany may, at its option, redeem the Series A Preferred Stock, in whole, at any time, or in part, from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and related offering costs were $49.3 million.unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to, but excluding, the redemption date.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the articles supplementary designating the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock), the Company has a special optional redemption right that enables it to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock, in whole or in part and within 120 days after the first date on which a change of control has occurred resulting in neither the Company nor the surviving entity having a class of common stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange, NYSE American, or NASDAQ or the acquisition of beneficial ownership of its stock entitling a person to exercise more than 50% of the total voting power of all our stock entitled to vote generally in election of directors. The special optional redemption price is $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not declared) to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control, holders will have the right (unless the Company has elected to exercise its
special optional redemption right to redeem their Series A Preferred Stock) to convert some or all of such holder’s Series A Preferred Stock into a number of shares of the Company's common stock equal to the lesser of:

the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the sum of the $25.00 liquidation preference plus the amount of any accrued and unpaid distributions to, but not including, the change of control conversion date (unless the change of control conversion date is after a record date for a Series A Preferred Stock distribution payment and prior to the corresponding Series A Preferred Stock distribution payment date, in which case no additional amount for such

accrued and unpaid distribution will be included in this sum) by (ii) the Common Stock Price (as defined in the articles supplementary designating the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock); and

2.97796 (i.e., the Share Cap), subject to certain adjustments;

subject, in each case, to certain adjustments and provisions for the receipt of alternative consideration of equivalent value as described in the articles supplementary designating the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

The former noncontrolling interest holder of Johns Hopkins Village had an option to redeem the 20% noncontrolling interest in that entity. The noncontrolling interest of $2.0 million was included in temporary equity. On December 21, 2017, the Company redeemed the noncontrolling interest for a cash payment of $2.0 million and contingent future consideration of $0.5 million to be paid in Class A Units of the Operating Partnership upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. On April 17, 2018, the Operating Partnership issued 36,684 Class A Units valued at $13.77 per unit due to the satisfaction of these conditions.
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company held a 68.1%72.6% and 65.6%74.5% common interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the sole general partnerCompany also held a preferred interest in the Operating Partnership in the form of preferred units with a liquidation preference of $63.3 million. The Company is the primary beneficiary of the Operating Partnership as it has the power to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership and the majority interest holder,rights to absorb 72.6% of the net income of the Operating Partnership. As the primary beneficiary, the Company consolidates the financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. Noncontrolling interests in the Company represent OP Unitsunits of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership not held by the Company. As of December 31, 2019, there were 21,272,962 Class A Units of limited partnership interest in the Operating partnership not held by the Company. The Company's financial position and results of operations are the same as those of the Operating Partnership.

Additionally, the Operating Partnership owns a majority interest in certain non-wholly-owned operating and development properties. The noncontrolling interest for investment entities of $4.5 million relates to the minority partners' interest in certain joint venture entities as of December 31, 2019, including 1405 Point and Hoffler Place. The noncontrolling interest for the consolidated entities under development or construction was zero as of December 31, 2018.

As partial consideration for Columbus Village, the Operating Partnership issued 1,000,000 class B units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership ("Class B UnitsUnits") on July 10, 2015 and issued 275,000 class C units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership ("Class C Units") on January 10, 2017. The Class B Units were automatically converted to Class A Units on July 10, 2017. The Class C Units were automatically converted to Class A Units on January 10, 2017. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, the Class B Units and Class C Units will not earn or accrue distributions until July 10, 2017 and January 10, 2018, respectively, at which time they automatically convert to Class A Units.2018.

On January 17, 2014, the Operating Partnership issued 695,652 Class A Units asAs partial consideration for the acquisition of Liberty Apartments. On March 31, 2014,Parkway Centre, the Operating Partnership issued 30,000117,228 Class A Units in exchange for all noncontrolling interests in Sandbridge Commons. The Company recognized the difference between the fair value of the Class A Units issued and the adjustment to the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interests in Sandbridge Commons directly in equity as additional paid-in capital. on January 29, 2018.

On August 15, 2014,April 17, 2018, the Operating Partnership issued 990,95236,684 Class A Units as partial considerationto the former noncontrolling interest holder of John Hopkins Village due to the satisfaction of a contingent event that was part of the redemption of its redeemable noncontrolling interest in Johns Hopkins Village in December 2017.

On January 2, 2019, due to the holders of Class A Units tendering an aggregate of 118,471 Class A Units for redemption by the Operating Partnership, the Company elected to satisfy the redemption requests through the issuance of an equal number of shares of common stock.

On May 23, 2019, the Operating Partnership issued 4,125,759 Class A Units valued at $68.1 million in connection with the acquisitions of Red Mill Commons and Marketplace at Hilltop.

On May 30, 2019, the Operating Partnership issued 60,000 Class A Units valued at $1.0 million in exchange for the remaining 35% ownership interest in Brooks Crossing Office, which was previously owned by Tidewater Partners.


On July 1, 2019, due to the holders of Class A Units tendering an aggregate of 125,118 Class A Units for redemption by the Operating Partnership, the Company elected to satisfy the redemption requests through the issuance of an equal number of shares of common stock.

On August 20, 2019, the Operating Partnership issued 40,864 Class A Units valued at $0.7 million due to the satisfaction of certain leasing requirements associated with the 2018 acquisition of DimmockLexington Square.

On September 20, 2019, the Operating Partnership issued 73,666 Class A Units valued at $1.3 million upon the satisfaction of certain leasing and development requirements associated with the 2016 acquisition of Southgate Square.

On October 1, 2019, due to a holder of Class A Units tendering 4,896 Class A Units for redemption by the Operating Partnership, the Company elected to satisfy the redemption request through the issuance of an equal number of shares of common stock.

On December 16, 2019, the Operating Partnership issued additional 110,754 Class A Units valued at $2.1 million due to the satisfaction of certain leasing requirements associated with the 2018 acquisition of Lexington Square.

Holders of OP Units may not transfer their units without the Company’s prior consent as general partner of the Operating Partnership. Subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, holders of Class A Units may tender their units for redemption by the Operating Partnership in exchange for cash equal to the market price of shares of the Company’s common stock at the time of redemption or, at the Company’s option and sole discretion, for unregistered or registered shares of common stock on a one-for-one1-for-one basis. Accordingly, the Company presents OP Units of the Operating Partnership not held by the Company as noncontrolling interests within equity in the consolidated balance sheets. 



Common Stock Dividends andClass AUnit Distributions
 
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company declared dividends per common share and distributions per unit of $0.84, $0.80, and $0.76, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, these common stock dividends totaled $45.4 million, $38.7 million, and $31.1 million, respectively, and these Operating Partnership distributions totaled $16.9 million, $13.8 million, and $12.6 million, respectively.

The tax treatment of dividends paid to common stockholders during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was as follows (unaudited):
 Years ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Capital gains10.62% 9.49% 9.06%
Ordinary income68.83% 63.40% 71.59%
Return of capital20.55% 27.11% 19.35%
Total100.00% 100.0% 100.0%


During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019 the Company declared the following dividends of $0.970315 per share and distributions per unit:
Declaration Date 
Record Date 
 
Paid Date 
 
Dividend Per
Share/Distribution
Per Unit 
January 31, 2016March 30, 2016 April 7, 2016 $0.18
May 2, 2016June 29, 2016 July 7, 2016 0.18
August 4, 2016September 28, 2016 October 6, 2016 0.18
November 3, 2016December 28, 2016 January 5, 2017 0.18
   Total $0.72
Duringto holders of Series A Preferred Stock totaling $2.5 million. The Company did not have dividends for preferred shares during the yearyears ended December 31, 2016,2018 and 2017.

Subsequent to December 31, 2019
On January 2, 2020, the Company paid cash dividends of $22.7$11.8 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $11.1 million to holders of Class A Units.
The tax treatment of dividends paid to common stockholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 was as follows (unaudited):
Capital gains—%
Ordinary income78.00%
Return of capital22.00%
Total100.00%
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company declared the following dividends per share and distributions per unit:
Declaration DateRecord Date Paid Date 
Dividend Per
Share/Distribution
Per Unit 
January 28, 2015April 1, 2015 April 9, 2015 $0.17
May 8, 2015July 1, 2015 July 9, 2015 0.17
August 6, 2015October 1, 2015 October 8, 2015 0.17
November 6, 2015December 31, 2015 January 7, 2016 0.17
   Total $0.68
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company paid cash dividends of $17.1 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $9.9 million to holders of Class A Units.
The tax treatment of dividends paid to common stockholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 was as follows (unaudited):
Capital gains—%
Ordinary income64.21%
Return of capital35.79%
Total100.00%

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company declared the following dividends per share and distributions per unit:
Declaration DateRecord Date Paid Date 
Dividend Per
Share/Distribution
Per Unit 
February 18, 2014April 1, 2014 April 10, 2014 $0.16
May 9, 2014July 1, 2014 July 10, 2014 0.16
August 4, 2014October 1, 2014 October 9, 2014 0.16
November 10, 2014December 30, 2014 January 8, 2015 0.16
   Total $0.64

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid cash dividends of $13.2 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $8.9 million to holders of OP Units.
The tax treatment of dividends paid to common stockholders during the year ended December 31, 2014 was as follows (unaudited):
Capital gains5.3%
Ordinary income52.3%
Return of capital42.4%
Total100.0%
Subsequent to December 31, 2016
On January 5, 2017, the Company paid cash dividends of $6.7 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $3.0$4.5 million to holders of Class A Units. These dividends and distributions were declared and accrued as of December 31, 2016.2019.

On January 10, 2017,15, 2020, the Company issued 275,000 Class C Units pursuantpaid cash dividends of $1.1 million to the termsholders of the previously completed Columbus Village acquisition.Series A Preferred Stock. These dividends were declared and accrued as of December 31, 2019.

On January 10, 2017, the Company issued 68,691 Class A Units for the remaining 20% interests in the Town Center Phase VI project.

On February 2, 2017,20, 2020, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.19$0.22 per common share for the first quarter of 2020. This represents a 4.8% increase over the prior quarter's cash dividend. The first quarter dividend will be payable in cash on April 2, 2020 to stockholders of record on March 29, 2017.  25, 2020.

On February 20, 2020, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.421875 per share of Series A Preferred Stock for the first quarter of 2020. The dividend will be payable in cash on April 15, 2020 to stockholders of record on April 1, 2020.

11.Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company’s Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Plan") permits the grant of restricted stock awards, stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance units, and other equity-based awards up to an aggregate of 700,0001,700,000 shares of common stock over the ten-year term of the plan.stock. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had 218,050890,990 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.
 
During the three years ended December 31, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company granted an aggregate of 0.1 million, 0.1 million154,030, 164,241 and 0.1 million118,361 shares of restricted stock to employees and nonemployee directors, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards granted during each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017 was $1.4$2.4 million, $1.2$2.2 million and $1.3$1.7 million, respectively. Employee restricted stock awards generally vest over a period of two years: one-third immediately on the grant date and the remaining two-thirds in equal amounts on the first two anniversaries following the grant date, subject to continued service to the Company. Nonemployee director restricted stock awards vest either immediately upon grant or over a period of one year, subject to continued service to the Company. Unvested restricted stock awards are entitled to receive dividends from their grant date.
 

During each of the three years ended December 31, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company recognized $1.2$2.4 million, $1.0$2.0 million and $1.3$1.5 million of stock-based compensation, respectively. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted shares was $0.4$0.1 million, substantially all of which the Company expects to recognize over the next 15 months.

Compensation cost relating to stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was recorded as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
General and administrative expense$1,211
 $1,073
 $977
General contracting and real estate services expenses402
 213
 335
Capitalized in conjunction with development projects746
 661
 408
Total stock-based compensation cost$2,359
 $1,947
 $1,720



The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s nonvested restricted stock awards during the year ended December 31, 2016:
2019:
 
Restricted Stock
Awards
 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested as of January 1, 2019125,229
 $13.68
Granted154,030
 15.43
Vested(134,346) 14.39
Forfeited(961) 14.24
Nonvested as of  December 31, 2019143,952
 $14.88
 
Restricted Stock
Awards
 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested as of January 1, 2016102,055
 $10.52
Granted121,243
 11.22
Vested(118,374) 10.63
Forfeited(85) 10.84
Nonvested as of  December 31, 2016104,839
 $11.20

 
Restricted stock awards granted and vested during the year ended December 31, 20162019 include 20,01119,245 shares tendered by employees to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding obligations.



12.Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
Fair value measurements are based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. The hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value is as follows:
 
Level 1 Inputs—Inputs — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
 
Level 2 Inputs—Inputs — observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
 
Level 3 Inputs—Inputs — unobservable inputs
 
Except as disclosed below, the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments approximate their fair value.values. Financial assets and liabilities whose fair values are measured on a recurring basis using Level 2 inputs consist of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps. The Company measures the fair values of these assets and liabilities based on prices provided by independent market participants that are based on observable inputs using market-based valuation techniques.
 
Financial assets and liabilities whose fair values are not measured at fair value but for which the fair value is disclosed include the Company's notes receivable and indebtedness. The fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates consistent with the maturity, credit characteristics, and other terms of the arrangements, which are Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. For disclosure purposes, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The fair value of the Company’s debt is sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. Discounted cash flow analysis based on Level 2 inputs is generally used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s debt.

Considerable judgment is used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. The estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized upon disposition of the financial instruments.


The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments all of which are based on Level 2 inputs, as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were as follows (in thousands):
 December 31, 
 2019 2018
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
Indebtedness, net$950,537
 $958,421
 $694,239
 $688,437
Notes receivable159,371
 159,371
 138,683
 138,683
Interest rate swap liabilities7,720
 7,720
 2,474
 2,474
Interest rate swap and cap assets25
 25
 2,093
 2,093
 December 31, 
 2016 2015
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
Indebtedness, net$522,180
 $527,414
 $377,593
 $384,691
Interest rate swap liabilities829
 829
 1,082
 1,082
Interest rate cap assets259
 259
 164
 164

 

13.Income Taxes
 
The income tax benefit (provision) for each of the three years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2017 comprised the following (in thousands):

 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Federal income taxes:           
Current$430
 $(14) $(516)
Deferred(20) 37
 (131)
State income taxes:     
Current85
 (1) (62)
Deferred(4) 7
 (16)
Income tax benefit (provision)$491
 $29
 $(725)
 Years Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
Federal income taxes:           
Current$(197) $102
 $(37)
Deferred(109) (72) (6)
State income taxes:     
Current(24) 13
 (26)
Deferred(13) (9) (1)
Income tax benefit (provision)$(343) $34
 $(70)

 
The legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% (including with respect to taxable REIT subsidiaries), resulting in the Company's remeasuring its existing deferred tax balances. In addition, generally beginning in 2018, the Tax Act alters the deductibility of certain items (e.g., interest expense) and allows the cost of certain qualifying capital asset investments to be deducted fully in the year they were purchased, subject to a phase-down of the deduction percentage over time. The provisional amounts recorded in the year ended December 31, 2017 related to the remeasurement of the deferred tax balance was approximately $0.2 million of tax expense.

As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company had $0.5$0.9 million and $0.6$0.4 million, respectively, of net deferred tax assets representing net operating losses of the TRS that are being carried forward and basis differences in the assets of the TRS and stock-based compensation attributable toTRS. The deferred tax assets are presented within other assets in the TRS.consolidated balance sheets.


Management has evaluated the Company’s income tax positions and concluded that the Company has no uncertain income tax positions as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015.2018. The Company is generally subject to examination by the applicable taxing authorities for the tax years 20132016 through 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the2019. The Company was subject to three separatedoes not currently have any ongoing tax examinations. The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") is examining the Company's 2014 income tax returns. The Virginia Department of Taxation is examining the Company's Virginia tax returns for the tax years 2013 through 2016, and the North Carolina Department of Revenue is examining the Company's North Carolina sales tax returns for the tax years 2013 through 2016. The North Carolina Department of Revenue sales tax audit was completed in December 2016 resulting in no liability to the Company.examinations by taxing authorities.


14.Other Assets
 
Other assets were comprised of the following as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):
 
 December 31, 
 2019 2018
Leasing costs, net$11,357
 $10,881
Leasing incentives, net2,855
 3,592
Interest rate swaps and caps25
 2,093
Prepaid expenses and other12,192
 9,836
Preacquisition and predevelopment costs6,472
 1,214
Other assets$32,901
 $27,616
 December 31, 
 2016 2015
Acquired lease intangibles, net$38,853
 $18,418
Leasing costs, net9,338
 10,839
Leasing incentives, net4,764
 5,408
Prepaid expenses and other10,056
 2,781
Advance deposits on property acquisitions75
 3,500
Preacquisition development costs1,079
 2,504
Other assets$64,165
 $43,450

 

15.Other Liabilities
 
Other liabilities were comprised of the following as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):
 
 December 31, 
 2019 2018
Dividends and distributions payable$17,477
 $13,527
Deferred ground rent payable (a)
—
 9,287
Acquired lease intangibles, net21,300
 12,678
Prepaid rent and other8,604
 3,509
Security deposits2,673
 1,927
Interest rate swaps7,720
 2,475
Guarantee Liability5,271
 2,800
Other liabilities$63,045
 $46,203

 December 31, 
 2016 2015
Dividends and distributions payable$9,727
 $7,621
Deferred ground rent payable8,202
 7,484
Acquired lease intangibles, net15,545
 5,872
Prepaid rent and other3,227
 2,145
Security deposits1,679
 1,267
Interest rate swaps829
 1,082
Other liabilities$39,209
 $25,471
(a) Effective with the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, deferred ground rent payable is included in operating lease right-of-use assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
 
16.Acquired Lease Intangibles
 
The following table summarizes the Company’s acquired lease intangibles as of December 31, 20162019 (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2016December 31, 2019
Gross Carrying Accumulated Net CarryingGross Carrying Accumulated Net Carrying
Amount Amortization  AmountAmount Amortization  Amount
In-place lease assets$49,124
 $15,350
 $33,774
$112,555
 $47,341
 $65,214
Above-market lease assets4,490
 1,138
 3,352
7,039
 3,551
 3,488
Below-market ground lease assets     
Below-market operating ground lease assets1,920
 352
 1,568
Below-market finance ground lease assets6,629
 102
 6,527
Below-market lease liabilities18,039
 2,494
 15,545
29,575
 8,275
 21,300
Below-market ground lease assets1,920
 193
 1,727
 
The following table summarizes the Company’s acquired lease intangibles as of December 31, 20152018 (in thousands):
 
 December 31, 2018
 Gross Carrying Accumulated Net Carrying
 Amount Amortization Amount
In-place lease assets$57,689
 $32,370
 $25,319
Above-market lease assets4,917
 2,676
 2,241
Below-market ground lease assets     
Below-market operating ground lease assets1,920
 299
 1,621
Below-market finance ground lease assets (a)
—
 —
 —
Below-market lease liabilities18,692
 6,014
 12,678

(a) All of the Company's leases were classified as Operating Leases prior to 2019.
 December 31, 2015
 Gross Carrying Accumulated Net Carrying
 Amount Amortization Amount
In-place lease assets$19,700
 $5,128
 $14,572
Above-market lease assets2,380
 314
 2,066
Below-market lease liabilities6,640
 768
 5,872
Below-market ground lease assets1,920
 140
 1,780

Amortization of in-place lease assets, net below-market lease liabilities and below-market ground lease assets forDuring the yearyears ended December 31, 2016 was $10.2 million, $1.8 million2019, 2018, and less than $0.9 million, respectively.2017, the Company recognized the following amortization of intangible lease assets and liabilities (in thousands):

 Years Ended December 31, 
 2019 2018 2017
Intangible lease assets     
In-place lease assets$14,971
 $7,676
 $9,732
Above-market lease assets875
 753
 783
Below-market ground lease assets     
Amortization of below-market operating ground lease assets (a)
53
 53
 53
Amortization of below-market finance ground lease assets (a)(b)
102
 —
 —
Intangible lease liabilities     
Below-market lease liabilities2,261
 1,754
 1,762

(a) Prior to 2019, Amortization of in-place lease assets, net below-market lease liabilities and below-market ground lease assets forBelow Market Ground Leases was included in Rental Expenses. With the year ended December 31, 2015 was $2.9 million, $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively.

adoption of ASC 842 on 1/1/2019, Amortization of in-place leasebelow market ground rents became a component of the amortization of the right-of-use assets net below-market lease liabilitiesof Operating and below-market ground lease assets forFinance Leases, respectively.
(b) All of the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.3 million, $0.2 million, and less than $0.1 million, respectively.Company's leases were classified as Operating Leases prior to 2019.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, the weighted-average remaining lives of in-place lease assets, above-market lease assets, below-market lease liabilities, below-market ground lease assets - operating and below-market ground lease assets - finance were 5.37.8 years, 6.75.2 years, 11.5 years, 29.5 years, and 9.941.2 years, respectively. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the weighted-average remaining life of below-market lease renewal options was 9.012.2 years.
 
Estimated amortization of acquired lease intangibles for each of the five succeeding years is as follows (in thousands):
 
   Depreciation and
 Rental Revenues Amortization
Year ending December 31,    
2020$1,522
 $12,360
20211,545
 9,858
20221,552
 8,312
20231,413
 6,823
20241,411
 5,609
     Depreciation and
 Rental Revenues Rental Expenses Amortization
Year ending December 31,      
2017$1,002
 $53
 $9,535
2018993
 53
 6,682
2019883
 53
 5,192
2020743
 53
 3,522
2021755
 53
 2,125

 
17.Related Party Transactions
 
The Companyprovides general contracting and real estate services to certain related party entities that are not included in these consolidated financial statements. Revenue from construction contracts with related party entities of the Company was $26.7$5.7 million, $9.6$1.5 million and $5.3$7.6 million for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Gross profits from such contracts were $1.0$0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.3$0.4 million for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. AmountsAs of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was $1.9 million and $0.2 million, respectively, outstanding from related parties of the Company included in net construction receivables as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $3.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively.receivables. Real estate services fees from affiliated entities of the Company was $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and were not significantmaterial for eitherany of the years ended December 31, 2016 or 2015.2019, 2018, and 2017. In addition, affiliated entities also reimburse the Company for monthly maintenance and facilities management services provided to the properties. Cost reimbursements earned by the Company from affiliated entities were not significantmaterial for any of the three years ended December 31, 2016.2019, 2018, and 2017.

In connectionThe general contracting services described above include contracts with an aggregate price of $79.3 million with the formation transactions for the Company's initial public offering, the Operating Partnership entered into tax protection agreements that indemnify certain directorsdeveloper of a mixed-use project, including an apartment building, retail space, and executive officersa parking garage to be located in Virginia Beach, Virginia. The developer is owned in part by executives of the Company, from their tax liabilities resulting fromnot including the potential future saleChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. These contracts were executed in October and December 2019 and are projected to result in aggregate gross profit of certain$3.0 million to the Company, representing a gross profit margin of 4.0%. As part of these contracts and per the requirements of the Company’s properties within seven (or, inlender for this project, the Company issued a limited numberletter of cases, ten) years

credit for $9.5 million to secure certain performances of the completionCompany's subsidiary construction company under the contracts, which remains outstanding as of the formation transactions on May 13, 2013. Upon completing the sale of the Virginia Natural Gas office property on November 20, 2014, the Operating Partnership paid $1.3 million under such tax protection agreements. The $1.3 million of tax protection payments made in connection with the Virginia Natural Gas office property sale is presented within gain on real estate dispositions in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.December 31, 2019.
  
18.Commitments and Contingencies
 
Legal Proceedings
 
The Company is from time to time involved in various disputes, lawsuits, warranty claims, environmental and other matters arising in the ordinary course of its business. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any potential loss relating to these matters.
 

The Company currently is a party to various legal proceedings, none of which management expects will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. Management accrues a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is determined by management to be probable and a range of loss can be reasonably estimated, management accrues the best estimate within the range; however, if no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other, the minimum amount within the range is accrued. Legal fees related to litigation are expensed as incurred. Management does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations; however, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties.


Under the Company’s leases, tenants are typically obligated to indemnify the Company from and against all liabilities, costs, and expenses imposed upon or asserted against it as owner of the properties due to certain matters relating to the operation of the properties by the tenant.
 
Guarantees

In connection with the Company's mezzanine lending activities, the Company has made guarantees to pay portions of certain senior loans of third parties associated with the development projects. The following table summarizes the payment guarantees made by the Company as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

 Payment guarantee amount
The Residences at Annapolis Junction $8,300
Delray Plaza 5,180
Nexton Square 12,600
Interlock Commercial 30,654
Total $56,734

Commitments
 
The Company has a bonding line of credit for its general contracting construction business and is contingently liable under performance and payment bonds, bonds for cancellation of mechanics liens, and defect bonds. Such bonds collectively totaled $40.5$4.3 million and $183.0$34.8 million as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. In addition, as of December 31, 2019, the Company has issued a letter of credit for $9.5 million to secure certain performances of the Company's subsidiary construction company under a related party project.
 
The Operating Partnership has entered into standby letters of credit using the available capacity under the credit facility. The letters of credit relaterelated to the guarantee of future performance on certain of the Company’s construction contracts. Letters of credit generally are available for draw down in the event the Company does not perform. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015,2019, the Operating Partnership had totalan outstanding lettersletter of credit of $4.1$9.5 million, and $8.0 million, respectively. The amount outstanding atas noted above. As of December 31, 2016 includes a $2.1 million2018, the Operating Partnership had an outstanding letter of credit of $2.1 million related to the guarantee on the Point Street Apartments senior construction loan.
 
The Company has five ground leases on four properties with initial terms that range from 20 to 65 years and options to extend up to an additional 40 years in certain cases. The Company also leases automobiles and equipment.
Future minimum rental payments during each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
2017$1,715
20181,738
20191,813
20201,821
20211,840
Thereafter91,453
Total$100,380
Ground rent expense for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016 was $2.0 million, $1.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
The majority of the Company’s properties are located in Hampton Roads, Virginia. For each of the three years ended December 31, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2017, rental revenues from Hampton Roads properties represented 52%48%, 68%53% and 69%53%,  respectively, of the Company’s rental revenues. Many of the Company’s Hampton Roads properties are located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach. For each of the three years ended December 31, 2016,2019, 2018, and 2017, rental revenues from Town Center properties represented 41%31%, 46%38% and 47%38%, respectively, of the Company’s rental revenues. Rental revenues from Richmond Tower, which we sold in January 2016, individually represented 1%, 11% and 13% of the Company’s rental revenues for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016, respectively.
 
A singlegroup of three construction project in Baltimore, Maryland represented 18%customers comprised 67%, 55%, and 64%41% of the Company’s general contracting and real estate services revenues for the years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively. The same project

customers represented 29%66%, 28%, and 50%20% of the Company’s general contracting and real estate services segment gross profit for the years ended December 31, 20162019, 2018, and 2015,2017, respectively.


19.Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
 
The following tables summarize certain selected quarterly financial data for 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands, except per share data):
 
2016 Quarters2019 Quarters
First Second Third FourthFirst Second Third Fourth
Rental revenues$23,283
 $24,251
 $25,305
 $26,516
$30,909
 $36,378
 $42,220
 $41,832
General contracting and real estate services revenues36,803
 33,200
 38,552
 50,475
17,036
 21,444
 27,638
 39,741
Net operating income17,371
 17,973
 18,393
 19,740
21,806
 26,333
 29,359
 28,869
Net income (1)
26,533
 3,131
 7,946
 5,145
6,514
 5,826
 12,063
 7,855
Net income attributable to stockholders17,370
 2,034
 5,212
 3,458
Net income per share: basic and diluted$0.57
 $0.06
 $0.15
 $0.09
Net income attributable to common stockholders4,884
 4,412
 7,079
 5,223
Net income attributable to common stockholders per share (basic and diluted)$0.10
 $0.08
 $0.13
 $0.09
 
 2018 Quarters
 First Second Third Fourth
Rental revenues$28,699
 $28,598
 $28,930
 $30,731
General contracting and real estate services revenues23,050
 20,654
 19,950
 12,705
Net operating income20,098
 19,908
 19,964
 21,114
Net income6,983
 5,945
 5,669
 4,895
Net income attributable to common stockholders5,040
 4,319
 4,202
 3,642
Net income attributable to common stockholders per share (basic and diluted)$0.11
 $0.09
 $0.09
 $0.07

 2015 Quarters
 First Second Third Fourth
Rental revenues$18,190
 $19,908
 $21,303
 $21,771
General contracting and real estate services revenues29,071
 47,066
 53,822
 41,309
Net operating income12,702
 15,101
 16,488
 15,819
Net income8,118
 10,285
 4,337
 8,443
Net income attributable to stockholders5,105
 6,521
 2,688
 5,328
Net income per share: basic and diluted$0.20
 $0.25
 $0.10
 $0.19



(1)    First quarter amount includes a $26.2 million gain on the disposition of Richmond Tower.



SCHEDULE III—Consolidated Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 20162019
 
  
Initial Cost Cost Capitalized Gross Carrying Amount  
  
  Year of
  
 
  
Initial Cost Cost Capitalized Gross Carrying Amount  
  
  Year of
  
 
  
  Building and Subsequent to   Building and   Accumulated
  
Net Carrying Construction/
  
 
  
  Building and Subsequent to   Building and   Accumulated
  
Net Carrying Construction/
  
Encumbrances
  
Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements Total Depreciation
  
Amount(1) Acquisition
  
Encumbrances
  
Land Improvements Acquisition Land Improvements Total Depreciation
  
Amount (1)
 Acquisition
  
Office 
     
             
     
   
  
 
     
             
     
   
  
4525 Main Street$32,034
  
$982
 $—
 $40,759
 $982
 $40,759
 $41,741
 $3,007
  
$38,734
 2014
  
$31,876
  
$982
 $—
 $46,282
 $982
 $46,282
 $47,264
 $8,097
  
$39,167
 2014
  
Armada Hoffler Tower—
(2) 
1,976
 —
 56,613
 1,976
 56,613
 58,589
 27,427
  
31,162
 2002
  
—
(2) 
1,976
 —
 63,304
 1,976
 63,304
 65,280
 34,237
  
31,043
 2002
  
Commonwealth of Virginia—Chesapeake4,933
  
328
 —
 6,211
 328
 6,211
 6,539
 587
  
5,952
 2015
  
Commonwealth of Virginia—Virginia Beach—
  
208
 —
 2,159
 208
 2,159
 2,367
 181
  
2,186
 2015
  
Brooks Crossing Office14,411
 295
 —
 19,709
 295
 19,709
 20,004
 462
 19,542
 2016
 
One City Center25,286
 2,911
 28,202
 4,632
 2,911
 32,834
 35,745
 661
 35,084
 2018/2019
 
One Columbus—
(2) 
960
 10,269
 7,345
 960
 17,614
 18,574
 9,627
  
8,947
 1984/2000
  
—
(2) 
960
 10,269
 12,009
 960
 22,278
 23,238
 11,958
  
11,280
 1984
  
Thames Street Wharf70,000
 15,861
 64,689
 63
 15,861
 64,752
 80,613
 858
 79,755
 2010/2019
 
Two Columbus—
(2) 
53
 —
 19,036
 53
 19,036
 19,089
 5,999
  
13,090
 2009
  
—
(2) 
53
 —
 20,704
 53
 20,704
 20,757
 8,747
  
12,010
 2009
  
Wills Wharf29,154
 —
 —
 84,119
 —
 84,119
 84,119
 —
 84,119
 2019
(4) 
Total office$36,967
  
$4,507
 $10,269
 $132,123
 $4,507
 $142,392
 $146,899
 $46,828
  
$100,071
  
  
$170,727
 $23,038
 $103,160
 $250,822
 $23,038
 $353,982
 $377,020
 $65,020
  
$312,000
  
  
Retail 
  
             
  
   
  
               
  
   
  
249 Central Park Retail$17,076
  
$712
 $—
 $14,838
 $712
 $14,838
 $15,550
 $7,641
  
$7,909
 2004
  
$16,828
 $712
 $—
 $15,703
 $712
 $15,703
 $16,415
 $9,406
  
$7,009
 2004
  
Alexander Pointe—
(2) 
4,050
 4,880
 23
 4,050
 4,903
 8,953
 232
 8,721
 1997
 —
(2) 
4,050
 4,880
 149
 4,050
 5,029
 9,079
 950
 8,129
 1997/2016
 
Apex Entertainment (Dick's)—
(2) 
67
 —
 10,596
 67
 10,596
 10,663
 4,778
  
5,885
 2002
 
Bermuda Crossroads—
(2) 
5,450
 10,641
 689
 5,450
 11,330
 16,780
 1,804
  
14,976
 2001/2013
  
—
(2) 
5,450
 10,641
 1,431
 5,450
 12,072
 17,522
 2,951
  
14,571
 2001/2013
  
Broad Creek Shopping Center—
(2) 
—
 —
 15,845
 —
 15,845
 15,845
 8,446
  
7,399
 1997-2001
  
—
(2) 
—
 —
 9,135
 —
 9,135
 9,135
 4,327
  
4,808
 1997-2001
  
Broadmoor Plaza—
 2,410
 9,010
 24
 2,410
 9,034
 11,444
 437
 11,007
 1980
 —
(2) 
2,410
 9,010
 966
 2,410
 9,976
 12,386
 1,843
 10,543
 1980/2016
 
Brooks Crossing—
 117
 —
 2,276
 117
 2,276
 2,393
 22
 2,371
 2016
 
Brooks Crossing Retail—
 359
 —
 2,334
 359
 2,334
 2,693
 229
 2,464
 2016
 
Columbus Village8,524
  
7,631
 10,135
 —
 7,631
 10,135
 17,766
 439
  
17,327
 1985/2015
  
—
(2) 
7,631
 10,135
 7,028
 7,631
 17,163
 24,794
 2,512
  
22,282
 1980/2015
  
Columbus Village II—
 14,536
 10,922
 14
 14,536
 10,936
 25,472
 104
 25,368
 1995/1996
 —
(2) 
14,536
 10,922
 64
 14,536
 10,986
 25,522
 1,364
 24,158
 1995/2016
 
Commerce Street Retail—
(2) 
118
 —
 3,209
 118
 3,209
 3,327
 1,173
  
2,154
 2008
  
—
(2) 
118
 —
 3,307
 118
 3,307
 3,425
 1,697
  
1,728
 2008
  
Courthouse 7-Eleven—
(2) 
1,007
 —
 1,043
 1,007
 1,043
 2,050
 136
  
1,914
 2011
  
—
(2) 
1,007
 —
 1,044
 1,007
 1,044
 2,051
 217
  
1,834
 2011
  
Dick’s at Town Center—
(2) 
67
 —
 10,522
 67
 10,522
 10,589
 3,507
  
7,082
 2002
  
Dimmock Square—
(2) 
5,100
 13,126
 46
 5,100
 13,172
 18,272
 877
  
17,395
 1998/2014
  
—
(2) 
5,100
 13,126
 314
 5,100
 13,440
 18,540
 2,034
  
16,506
 1998/2014
  
Fountain Plaza Retail10,281
  
425
 —
 7,112
 425
 7,112
 7,537
 2,950
  
4,587
 2004
  
10,127
 425
 —
 7,251
 425
 7,251
 7,676
 3,585
  
4,091
 2004
  
Gainsborough Square—
(2) 
2,229
 —
 7,064
 2,229
 7,064
 9,293
 3,005
  
6,288
 1999
  
—
(2) 
2,229
 —
 7,590
 2,229
 7,590
 9,819
 3,662
  
6,157
 1999
  
Greentree Shopping Center—
  
1,523
 —
 4,280
 1,523
 4,280
 5,803
 377
  
5,426
 2014
  
—
(2) 
1,103
 —
 4,036
 1,103
 4,036
 5,139
 888
  
4,251
 2014
  
Hanbury Village20,709
(2) 
3,793
 —
 19,262
 3,793
 19,262
 23,055
 5,770
  
17,285
 2009
  
18,515
(3) 
3,793
 —
 19,579
 3,793
 19,579
 23,372
 7,486
  
15,886
 2006
  
Harper Hill Commons—
(2) 
2,840
 8,510
 12
 2,840
 8,522
 11,362
 301
 11,061
 2004
 —
(2) 
2,840
 8,510
 263
 2,840
 8,773
 11,613
 1,169
 10,444
 2004/2016
 
Harrisonburg Regal3,256
  
1,554
 —
 4,149
 1,554
 4,149
 5,703
 1,881
  
3,822
 1999
  
—
 1,554
 —
 4,148
 1,554
 4,148
 5,702
 2,203
  
3,499
 1999
  
Lightfoot Marketplace12,194
  
7,628
 —
 14,728
 7,628
 14,728
 22,356
 227
(3) 
22,129
 0
(3) 
North Hampton Market—
(2) 
7,250
 10,210
 140
 7,250
 10,350
 17,600
 469
 17,131
 2004
 
North Point Center12,983
(2) 
1,936
 —
 25,119
 1,936
 25,119
 27,055
 11,788
  
15,267
 1998
  
Oakland Marketplace—
 1,850
 3,370
 10
 1,850
 3,380
 5,230
 436
 4,794
 2004
 
Parkway Marketplace—
(2) 
1,150
 —
 3,540
 1,150
 3,540
 4,690
 1,678
  
3,012
 1998
  
Indian Lakes Crossing—
(2) 
7,009
 2,274
 30
 7,009
 2,304
 9,313
 171
 9,142
 2008/2018
 
Lexington Square14,696
 3,035
 20,581
 110
 3,035
 20,691
 23,726
 915
 22,811
 2017/2018
 
Market at Mill Creek14,727
 2,243
 —
 20,386
 2,243
 20,386
 22,629
 415
 22,214
 2018
 
Marketplace at Hilltop10,517
 2,023
 19,886
 35
 2,023
 19,921
 21,944
 388
 21,556
 2000/2019
 

North Hampton Market—
(2) 
7,250
 10,210
 602
 7,250
 10,812
 18,062
 1,811
 16,251
 2004/2016
 
North Point Center2,214
(3) 
1,936
 —
 25,716
 1,936
 25,716
 27,652
 14,353
  
13,299
 1998
  
Oakland Marketplace—
(2) 
1,850
 3,370
 690
 1,850
 4,060
 5,910
 932
 4,978
 2004/2016
 
Parkway Centre—
(2) 
1,372
 7,864
 105
 1,372
 7,969
 9,341
 470
 8,871
 2017/2018
 
Parkway Marketplace—
(2) 
1,150
 —
 3,832
 1,150
 3,832
 4,982
 2,010
  
2,972
 1998
 
Patterson Place—
(2) 
15,059
 20,180
 11
 15,059
 20,191
 35,250
 676
 34,574
 2004
 —
(2) 
15,059
 20,180
 631
 15,059
 20,811
 35,870
 2,638
 33,232
 2004/2016
 
Perry Hall Marketplace—
(2) 
3,240
 8,316
 91
 3,240
 8,407
 11,647
 548
  
11,099
 2001/2015
  
—
(2) 
3,240
 8,316
 424
 3,240
 8,740
 11,980
 1,555
  
10,425
 2001/2015
  
Premier Retail8,250
 318
 —
 14,216
 318
 14,216
 14,534
 434
 14,100
 2018
 
Providence Plaza—
(2) 
9,950
 12,369
 476
 9,950
 12,845
 22,795
 505
  
22,290
 2008/2015
  
—
(2) 
9,950
 12,369
 1,454
 9,950
 13,823
 23,773
 1,904
  
21,869
 2007/2015
  
Renaissance Place—
 6,730
 8,439
 —
 6,730
 8,439
 15,169
 47
 15,122
 2008
 
Red Mill Commons24,365
(3) 
44,252
 30,348
 98
 44,252
 30,446
 74,698
 921
 73,777
 2000/2019
 
Renaissance Square—
(2) 
6,730
 8,439
 186
 6,730
 8,625
 15,355
 927
 14,428
 2008/2016
 
Sandbridge Commons9,376
  
5,267
 —
 7,236
 5,267
 7,236
 12,503
 511
  
11,992
 2015
  
8,020
 4,825
 —
 7,332
 4,825
 7,332
 12,157
 1,500
  
10,657
 2015
  
Socastee Commons4,866
  
2,320
 5,380
 45
 2,320
 5,425
 7,745
 328
  
7,417
 2000/2015
  
4,567
 2,320
 5,380
 147
 2,320
 5,527
 7,847
 940
  
6,907
 2000/2015
  
South Retail7,493
  
190
 —
 7,623
 190
 7,623
 7,813
 3,731
  
4,082
 2002
  
7,388
 190
 —
 8,123
 190
 8,123
 8,313
 4,527
  
3,786
 2002
  
South Square—
 14,130
 12,670
 14
 14,130
 12,684
 26,814
 476
 26,338
 1977/2005
 —
(2) 
14,130
 12,670
 757
 14,130
 13,427
 27,557
 1,966
 25,591
 1977/2016
 
Southgate Square21,150
 8,890
 25,950
 62
 8,890
 26,012
 34,902
 620
 34,282
 1991/2016
 20,562
 10,238
 25,950
 4,352
 10,238
 30,302
 40,540
 3,257
 37,283
 1991/2016
 
Southshore Shops—
 1,770
 6,509
 5
 1,770
 6,514
 8,284
 85
 8,199
 2006
 —
(2) 
1,770
 6,509
 84
 1,770
 6,593
 8,363
 710
 7,653
 2006/2016
 
Stone House Square—
(2) 
6,360
 16,350
 236
 6,360
 16,586
 22,946
 974
  
21,972
 2008/2015
  
—
(2) 
6,360
 16,350
 561
 6,360
 16,911
 23,271
 2,735
  
20,536
 2008/2015
  
Studio 56 Retail—
(2) 
76
 —
 2,477
 76
 2,477
 2,553
 727
  
1,826
 2007
  
—
(2) 
76
 —
 2,532
 76
 2,532
 2,608
 994
  
1,614
 2007
  
Tyre Neck Harris Teeter—
(2) 
—
 —
 3,306
 —
 3,306
 3,306
 756
  
2,550
 2011
  
—
(2) 
—
 —
 3,306
 —
 3,306
 3,306
 1,255
  
2,051
 2011
  
Waynesboro Commons—
 1,300
 1,610
 10
 1,300
 1,620
 2,920
 192
 2,728
 1993
 
Wendover Village—
(2) 
12,710
 14,490
 7
 12,710
 14,497
 27,207
 498
 26,709
 2004
 —
(2) 
19,893
 22,638
 429
 19,893
 23,067
 42,960
 2,451
 40,509
 2004/2016-2019
 
Total retail$127,908
  
$161,368
 $213,067
 $155,544
 $161,368
 $368,611
 $529,979
 $64,374
  
$465,605
  
  
$160,776
 $220,603
 $300,558
 $191,076
 $220,603
 $491,634
 $712,237
 $101,480
  
$610,757
  
 
Mutifamily                                                    
 
Multifamily                                                    
 
1405 Point$53,000
 $—
 $95,466
 $2,106
 $—
 $97,572
 $97,572
 $2,109
 $95,463
 2018/2019
 
Encore Apartments$24,966
 $1,293
 $—
 $30,124
 $1,293
 $30,124
 $31,417
 $1,997
 $29,420
 2014
 24,842
 1,293
 —
 30,322
 1,293
 30,322
 31,615
 5,144
 26,471
 2014
 
Harding Place—
 5,706
 —
 2,453
 5,706
 2,453
 8,159
 —
 8,159
 —
(3) 
Greenside Apartments34,000
 5,711
 —
 45,012
 5,711
 45,012
 50,723
 1,822
 48,901
 2018
 
Hoffler Place29,059
 7,401
 —
 39,758
 7,401
 39,758
 47,159
 486
 46,673
 2019
 
Johns Hopkins Village51,800
 —
 —
 69,931
 —
 69,931
 69,931
 7,711

62,220
 2016
 
Liberty Apartments20,005
 3,580
 23,494
 1,215
 3,580
 24,709
 28,289
 2,566
 25,723
 2013/2014
 14,165
 3,580
 23,494
 1,883
 3,580
 25,377
 28,957
 5,146
 23,811
 2013/2014
 
Johns Hopkins Village43,841
 —
 —
 65,875
 —
 65,875
 65,875
 863
(3) 
65,012
 —
(3) 
Premier Apartments16,750
 647
 —
 29,139
 647
 29,139
 29,786
 1,171
 28,615
 2018
 
Smith’s Landing20,511
 —
 35,105
 1,153
 —
 36,258
 36,258
 4,284
 31,974
 2009/2013
 18,174
 —
 35,105
 2,418
 —
 37,523
 37,523
 8,002
 29,521
 2009/2013
 
Summit Place28,824
 7,265
 —
 43,674
 7,265
 43,674
 50,939
 —
 50,939
 —
(4) 
The Cosmopolitan45,884
 985
 —
 56,957
 985
 56,957
 57,942
 18,641
 39,301
 2006
 43,702
 985
 —
 66,877
 985
 66,877
 67,862
 26,647
 41,215
 2006
 
Town Center Phase VI—
 1,174
 —
 1,615
 1,174
 1,615
 2,789
 —
 2,789
 —
 
Total multifamily$155,207
 $12,738
 $58,599
 $159,392
 $12,738
 $217,991
 $230,729
 $28,351
 $202,378
  
 $314,316
 $26,882
 $154,065
 $331,120
 $26,882
 $485,185
 $512,067
 $58,238
 $453,829
  
 
Held for development$—
 $680
 $—
 $—
 $680
 $—
 $680
 $—
 $680
  
 $—
 $5,000
 $—
 $—
 $5,000
 $—
 $5,000
 $—
 $5,000
  
 
Real estate investments$320,082
 $179,293
 $281,935
 $447,059
 $179,293
 $728,994
 $908,287
 $139,553
 $768,734
  
 $645,819
 $275,523
 $557,783
 $773,018
 $275,523
 $1,330,801
 $1,606,324
 $224,738
 $1,381,586
  
 


(1)The net carrying amount of real estate for federal income tax purposes was $655.9$1,122.8 million as of December 31, 2016.2019.  
(2)Borrowing base collateral for the credit facility as of December 31, 2016.2019.  
(3)A portion of this property is borrowing base collateral for the credit facility as of December 31, 2019.
(4)
Construction in progress as of December 31, 2016.  2019.  

Income producing property is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:
 
Buildings39 years
Capital improvements15—5—20 years
Equipment5—153—7 years
Tenant improvementsTerm of the related lease
 (or estimated useful life, if shorter)
 
 Real Estate Accumulated
 Investments Depreciation
 December 31, 
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Balance at beginning of the year$1,176,586
 $994,437
 $188,775
 $164,521
Construction costs and improvements143,700
 144,926
 —
 —
Acquisitions314,898
 51,613
 —
 —
Dispositions(28,117) (11,420) (1,818) (5,559)
Reclassifications(743) (2,970) (58) (582)
Depreciation—
 —
 37,839
 30,395
Balance at end of the year$1,606,324
 $1,176,586
 $224,738
 $188,775

 Real Estate Accumulated
 Investments Depreciation
 December 31, 
 2016 2015 2016 2015
Balance at beginning of the year$633,591
 $595,000
 $125,380
 $116,099
Construction costs and improvements56,630
 52,533
 —
 —
Acquisitions248,987
 83,230
 —
 —
Dispositions(30,467) (23,181) (352) (668)
Reclassifications(454) (73,991) (8,928) (8,729)
Depreciation—
 —
 23,453
 18,678
Balance at end of the year$908,287
 $633,591
 $139,553
 $125,380



INDEX TO EXHIBITS

F-52
Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on June 2, 2014)
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
4.1Form of Certificate of Common Stock of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.1Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Armada Hoffler, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2013)
10.2†Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.3†Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Time Vesting) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.4Indemnification Agreement between Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and each of the Directors and Officers listed on Schedule A thereto (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed on March 2, 2016)
10.5Tax Protection Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and the persons listed on the signature page thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2013)
10.6Representation, Warranty and Indemnity Agreement among Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., Armada Hoffler, L.P. and Daniel A. Hoffler (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 12, 2013)
10.7†
Armada Hoffler, L.P. Executive Severance Benefit Plan with the participants listed on Schedule A thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, filed on April November 12, 2013)
10.8Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and Daniel A. Hoffler, dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.9Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and A. Russell Kirk, dated February 12, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.10Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and Louis S. Haddad, dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference a to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.11Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and Anthony P. Nero, dated as of February 12, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.12Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Eric E. Apperson, dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.13Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Michael P. O’Hara, dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.14Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and John C. Davis, dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.15Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Alan R. Hunt, dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.16Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Shelly R. Hampton, dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.17Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and William Christopher Harvey, dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.18Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Eric L. Smith, dated as of February 12, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.19Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and John E. Babb, dated as of January 31, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.20Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Rickard E. Burnell, dated as of February 12, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.21Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and A/H TWA Associates, L.L.C., dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.22Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and RMJ Kirk Fortune Bay, L.L.C., dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.23Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Kirk Gainsborough, L.L.C., dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.24Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Chris A. Sanders, dated as of January 25, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.25Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Allen O. Keene, dated as of January 21, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.26Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Bruce G. Ford, dated as of January 31, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.27Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and DIAN, LLC, dated as of January 28, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.28Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Compson of Richmond, L.C., Thomas Comparato and Lindsey Smith Comparato, dated as of January 31, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.29Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Bruce Smith Enterprises, LLC and Bruce B. Smith, dated as of January 31, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.30Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Steyn, LLC, dated as of January 31, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.31Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and D&F Beach, L.L.C., dated as of February 1, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.32Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and DF Smith’s Landing, LLC, dated as of January 31, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.33Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Spratley Family Holdings, L.L.C., dated as of January 22, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 12, 2013)
10.34Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., and Columbus One, LLC, DP Columbus Two, LLC, City Center Associates, LLC, TC Block 7 Partners LLC, TC Block 12 Partners LLC, TC Block 3 Partners LLC, TC Block 6 Partners LLC, TC Block 8 Partners LLC, TC Block 11 Partners LLC and TC Apartment Partners, LLC, dated as of February 1, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.35Asset Purchase Agreement by and among AHP Asset Services, LLC and Armada Hoffler Holding Company, Inc., dated as of , 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.36Contribution Agreement for the Apprentice School Apartment property by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Washington Avenue Associates, L.L.C. and Washington Avenue Apartments, L.L.C., and dated as of , 2013 (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.37Land Option Agreement by and between and Armada Hoffler, L.P. and Courthouse Marketplace Parcel 7, L.L.C., dated as of May 1, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.38Land Option Agreement by and between and Armada Hoffler, L.P. and Courthouse Marketplace Outparcels, L.L.C., dated as of May, 1 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.39Land Option Agreement by and between and Armada Hoffler, L.P. and Hanbury Village, LLC, dated as of May 1, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.40Land Option Agreement by and between and Armada Hoffler, L.P. and Lake View AH-VNG, LLC, dated as of May 1, 2013 (Incorporated by to Exhibit 10.41 reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.41Land Option Agreement by and between and Armada Hoffler, L.P. and Oyster Point Hotel Associates, L.L.C., dated as of May 1, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.42Contribution Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and Oyster Point Investors, L.P., dated as of February 11, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on April 26, 2013)
10.43†Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.44Option Agreement dated May 1, 2013 by and between Armada/Hoffler Properties, L.L.C. and Armada Hoffler, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11/A, filed on May 2, 2013)
10.45Option Transfer Agreement by and among Town Center Associates, L.L.C. Armada/Hoffler Properties, L.L.C., City Center Associates, L.L.C. and Armada Hoffler, L.P., dated as of May 10, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 14, 2013)
10.46Construction Loan Agreement among TCA Block 11 Apartments, LLC and TCA Block 11 Office, LLC as Borrower and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, dated as of July 30, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 13, 2013)
10.47Credit Agreement by and among Armada Hoffler, L.P., Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., dated as of February 20, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 25, 2015)
10.48Unconditional Guaranty Agreement by Armada Hoffler, L.P. and certain subsidiaries of Armada Hoffler, L.P. named therein for the benefit of the Administrative Agent and the lenders named in the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 25, 2015)
10.49Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 19, 2014, to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Armada Hoffler, L.P., dated as of May 13, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 15, 2014)
10.50†Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. Short-Term Incentive Program (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, filed on March 16, 2015)
10.51Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 10, 2015, to the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Armada Hoffler, L.P., dated as of May 13, 2013 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 16, 2015)
10.52Construction Loan Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2015, by and among Hopkins Village, LLC, as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., and the other financial institutions party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 5, 2015)
10.53Agreement of Sale and Purchase, dated as of November 2, 2015, by and between AH Richmond Tower I, LLC and Kireland Management, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 13, 2016)

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.54First Amendment to Agreement of Sale and Purchase, dated as of November 10, 2015, by and between AH Richmond Tower I, LLC and Kireland Management, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 13, 2016)
10.55Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2015, by and between DDR-SAU South Square, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Durham Patterson, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Wendover Phase II, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Salisbury Alexander, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Winston-Salem Harper Hill, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Greer North Hampton Market, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Nashville Willowbrook, L.L.C., DDR-SAU South Bend Broadmoor, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Oakland, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Waynesboro, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Pasadena Red Bluff Limited Partnership and AHP Acquisitions, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed on March 2, 2016)
10.56First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 14, 2015, by and between DDR-SAU South Square, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Durham Patterson, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Wendover Phase II, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Salisbury Alexander, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Winston-Salem Harper Hill, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Greer North Hampton Market, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Nashville Willowbrook, L.L.C., DDR-SAU South Bend Broadmoor, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Oakland, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Waynesboro, L.L.C., DDR-SAU Pasadena Red Bluff Limited Partnership and AHP Acquisitions, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed on March 2, 2016)
10.57*Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement
21.1*List of Subsidiaries of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
23.1*Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Public Accounting Firm
31.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
*Filed herewith
**Furnished herewith
†Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement