UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_____________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Some of the statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-KAmendment constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts or present facts or conditions. In many cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

 

The forward-looking statements reflect our views about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause events or our actual activities or results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future events, results, actions, levels of activity, performance or achievements. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. These factors include without limitation:

 

Certain of these and other factors are discussed in more detail in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Amendment. The forward-looking statements included herein, except with respect to the changes discussed in “Explanatory Note”, are made only as of the date of this Annual Report on Formthe Original 10-K, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement made by us or on our behalf, whether as a result of new information, future developments, subsequent events or circumstances or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law.

 

PART I

Item 1A.     Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business

The industry in which we operate is dependent upon the homebuilding industry and repair and remodeling activity, the economy, the credit markets and other important factors.

The building products supply and services industry is highly dependent on new single-family home construction, multi-family construction and repair and remodeling activity, which in turn are dependent upon a number of factors, including interest rates, consumer confidence, employment rates, wage rates, foreclosure rates, housing inventory levels, housing demand, the availability of land, local zoning and permitting processes, the availability of construction financing, the availability of qualified trade laborers and the health of the economy and mortgage markets. Unfavorable changes in demographics, credit markets, mortgage rates, consumer confidence, health care costs, housing affordability, housing inventory levels, a weakening of the national economy or of any regional or local economy in which we operate, changes in legislation and government policy and other factors beyond our control could adversely affect consumer spending, result in decreased demand for homes and adversely affect our business.

The homebuilding industry underwent a significant downturn that began in mid-2006 and began to stabilize in late 2011. The downturn in the homebuilding industry resulted in a substantial reduction in demand for our products and services, which in turn had a significant adverse effect on our business during fiscal years 2007 through 2012. The U.S. Census Bureau reported approximately 873,000 single-family housing starts for 2018, which is an increase of approximately 3% from 2017, but still well below historical averages over the past 50 years.

There is significant uncertainty regarding the timing and extent of any continued recovery in construction and repair and remodeling activity and resulting product demand levels. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, single-family housing starts decreased approximately 8% for the three months ended December 31, 2018, as compared to the prior year period. Additionally, as of October 2018, Dodge Data & Analytics (formerly McGraw-Hill) forecasted that U.S. single-family housing starts will decrease approximately 3% in 2019. If conditions in the housing industry deteriorate, we may need to take goodwill and/or asset impairment charges. Any such non-cash charges would have an adverse effect on our financial results. In addition, we may have to temporarily idle or permanently close certain facilities in under-performing regions. Any such facility closures could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

The positive impact of a recovery on our business may also be dampened to the extent average size of new single-family homes decreases, which could cause homebuilders to decrease spending on our products and services. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the average square footage of a new single-family home start decreased in 2017 and 2016, as compared to the prior year, by 1% and 2%, respectively. This trend has continued through the first three quarters of 2018.

As the housing industry is dependent upon the economy as well as potential homebuyers’ access to mortgage financing and homebuilders’ access to commercial credit, constraint of the credit markets, including an increase in interest rates, could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Certain of our products are commodities and fluctuations in prices of these commodities could adversely affect our operating results.

Many of the building products we distribute, including OSB, plywood, lumber and particleboard, are commodities that are widely available from other manufacturers or distributors with prices and volumes determined frequently based on participants’ perceptions of short-term supply and demand factors. A shortage of capacity or excess capacity in the industry can result in significant increases or declines in market prices for those products, often within a short period of time.

Prices of commodity products can also change as a result of national and international economic conditions, labor and freight costs, competition, market speculation, government regulation and trade policies and tariffs, as well as from periodic delays in the delivery of lumber and other products. Short-term changes in the cost of these materials, some of which are subject to significant fluctuations, are sometimes passed on to our customers but our pricing quotation periods and pricing pressure from our competitors may limit our ability to pass on such price changes. For example, we frequently enter into extended pricing commitments, which may compress our gross margins in periods of inflation. At times, the price at which we can charge our customers for any one or more products may even fall below the price at which we can purchase such products, requiring us to incur short-term losses on product sales. Excessive spikes in the market prices of certain building products, such as lumber, can also put negative pressure

on our operating cash flows by requiring us to invest more in inventory. We may also be limited in our ability to pass on increases in freight costs on our products due to the price of fuel.

Periods of generally increasing prices provide the opportunity for higher sales and increased gross profit (subject to the extended pricing commitments described above), while generally declining price environments may result in declines in sales and profitability. In particular, low market prices for wood products over a sustained period can adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows, as can excessive spikes in market prices. For the year ended December 31, 2018, average composite framing lumber prices and average composite structural panel prices (a composite calculation based on index prices for OSB and plywood) as reported by Random Lengths were $460 and $481, respectively. However, there was significant volatility during the year, as the average composite framing lumber prices and average composite structural panel prices declined during the second half of 2018 from a peak of $564 and $566, respectively, during June 2018, to $335 and $365, respectively, during December 2018. If lumber or structural panel prices were to remain at or continue to decline significantly from current levels, our sales and profits could be negatively affected as compared to 2018 operating results. Our lumber and lumber sheet goods product category represented approximately 35% of net sales in 2018.

Some of our products are imported into the United States and may be subject to tariffs or import duties that may impact the price of the products and limit their availability. Furthermore, the ongoing trade dispute between the United States and Canada following the expiration of the Softwood Lumber Agreement in 2015 has led to, and could continue to lead to, increased volatility in prices of softwood lumber imported from Canada. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we imported between $285 million and $320 million of inventory, of which between $260 million and $290 million of inventory was from Canada.

Changes in our customer or product sales mix could affect our operating results.    

Our operating results may vary according to the amount and type of products we sell to each of our primary customer types: single-family homebuilders, remodeling contractors, and multi-family, commercial and other contractors. We tend to realize higher gross margins on sales to remodeling contractors due to the smaller product volumes purchased by those customers, as well as the more customized nature of the projects those customers generally undertake. Gross margins on sales to single-family, multi-family commercial and other contractors can vary based on a variety of factors, including the purchase volumes of the individual customer, the mix of products sold to that customer, the size and selling price of the project being constructed and the number of upgrades added to the project before or during its construction. 

We generate significant business from the large single-family homebuilders; however, our gross margins on sales to them tend to be lower than our gross margins on sales to other market segments. A shift in our sales mix towards the larger homebuilders could negatively impact our gross margins.

In addition, we typically realize greater gross margins on more highly engineered and customized products, or ancillary products that are often purchased based on convenience and are therefore less price sensitive to our customers. For example, sales of lumber and lumber sheet goods tend to generate lower gross margins due to their commodity nature and the relatively low switching costs of sourcing those products from different suppliers. Structural components and millwork, doors and windows often generate higher gross margins relative to other products. A shift in our sales mix towards the lumber and lumber sheet goods product category could negatively impact our gross margins.

See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for information regarding net sales by customer type and product category for each of the last three fiscal years.

We conduct a significant portion of our business in Texas, California and Georgia, which exposes us to the homebuilding activities within the markets of these states.

We presently conduct a significant portion of our business in Texas, California and Georgia, which represented approximately 31%, 14% and 10%, respectively, of 2018 total net sales. Sales activities in these markets and in most of the other markets in which we operate have declined from time to time, particularly as a result of slow economic growth. In the last several years, many of these markets have benefited from better than average employment growth, which has aided homebuilding activities, but we cannot assure you that these conditions will continue. Local economic conditions can depend on a variety of factors, including national economic conditions, local and state budget situations and the impact of cutbacks in federal spending and employment. Additionally, our concentration in these markets increases our exposure to natural disasters and other events adversely impacting these markets. A reduction in construction and remodeling activities in these markets could negatively impact our operating results in the future. If homebuilding activity declines in one or more of these markets or the other markets in which we operate, our costs may not decline at all or at the same rate and therefore may negatively impact our operating results.

Because our operations are currently concentrated in these areas, a prolonged economic downturn or localized adverse events in the future in one or more of these areas or a particular industry that is fundamental to one of these areas, particularly within Texas, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows, and a disproportionately

The loss of any of our significant customers or a reduction in the quantity of products they purchase could affect our financial health.

Our ten largest customers generated approximately 21% and 20% of our net sales for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. We cannot guarantee that we will maintain or improve our relationships with these customers or that we will continue to supply these customers at historical levels.

In addition, production homebuilders and other customers may: (i) seek to purchase some of the products that we currently sell directly from manufacturers; (ii) elect to establish their own building products manufacturing and distribution facilities or (iii) give advantages to manufacturing or distribution intermediaries in which they have an economic stake. Continued consolidation among production homebuilders could also result in a loss of some of our present customers to our competitors. The loss of one or more of our significant customers or deterioration in our relations with any of them could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Furthermore, our customers typically are not required to purchase any minimum amount of products from us. The contracts into which we have entered with most of our professional customers typically provide that we supply particular products or services for a certain period of time when and if ordered by the customer. Should our customers purchase our products in significantly lower quantities than they have in the past, such decreased purchases could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

The building products supply and services industry is seasonal and cyclical.

Our industry is seasonal. Although weather patterns affect our operating results throughout the year, our first and fourth quarters have historically been, and are generally expected to continue to be, adversely affected by weather patterns in some of our markets, causing reduced construction activity. To the extent that hurricanes, severe storms, earthquakes, floods, fires, droughts, other natural disasters or similar events occur in the markets in which we operate, our business may be adversely affected.

The building products supply and services industry is also subject to cyclical market pressures. Quarterly results historically have reflected, and are expected to continue to reflect, fluctuations from period to period arising from the following factors, among others: the volatility of lumber prices; the cyclical nature of the homebuilding industry; general economic conditions in the markets in which we compete; the pricing policies of our competitors and the production schedules of our customers.

Our industry is highly fragmented and competitive, and increased competitive pressure may adversely affect our results.

The building products supply and services industry is highly fragmented and competitive. We face significant competition from local, regional and national building materials chains, as well as from privately-owned single site enterprises. Any of these competitors may have one or more competitive advantages over us by, among other things, (i) foreseeing the course of market development more accurately than we do, (ii) providing superior service and selling superior products, (iii) having the ability to produce or supply similar products and services at a lower cost, (iv) developing stronger relationships with our customers, (v) adapting more quickly to new technologies or evolving customer requirements than we do or (vi) developing a superior branch network in our markets. As a result, we may not be able to compete successfully with them. In addition, home center retailers and/or eCommerce retailers, which have historically concentrated their sales efforts on retail consumers and small contractors, may in the future intensify their marketing efforts to professional homebuilders. Furthermore, certain product manufacturers sell and distribute their products directly to production homebuilders. The volume of such direct sales could increase in the future. Additionally, manufacturers and specialty distributors who sell products to us may elect to sell and distribute directly to homebuilders in the future or enter into exclusive supplier arrangements with other distributors. Consolidation of production homebuilders may result in increased competition for their business. Finally, we may not be able to maintain our operating costs or product prices at a level sufficiently low for us to compete effectively. If we are unable to compete effectively, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows may be adversely affected.

Production homebuilders historically have exerted significant pressure on their outside suppliers to keep prices low because of their market share and ability to leverage such market share in the highly fragmented building products supply and services industry. The housing industry downturn resulted in significantly increased pricing pressures from production homebuilders and other customers. Continued consolidation among homebuilders, and changes in homebuilders’ purchasing policies or payment practices,

could result in additional pricing pressure, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Some of our competitors are larger than we are and have greater financial resources. These resources may afford those competitors greater purchasing power, increased financial flexibility and more capital resources for expansion and improvement.

We are exposed to product liability, warranty, casualty, construction defect, contract, tort, employment and other claims and legal proceedings related to our business, products and services as well as services provided for us through third parties.

We are from time to time involved in product liability, warranty, casualty, construction defect, contract, tort, employment and other claims relating to our business, the products we manufacture, distribute or install, and services we provide, either directly or through third parties, that, if adversely determined, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows if we were unable to receive indemnification for such claims or were not adequately insured for such claims. We rely on manufacturers and other suppliers to provide us with many of the products we sell, distribute or install. Because we do not have direct control over the quality of such products manufactured or supplied by such third-party suppliers, we are exposed to risks relating to the quality of such products. In addition, we are exposed to potential claims arising from the conduct of our employees, homebuilders and their subcontractors, and third-party installers for which we may be liable. We and they are subject to regulatory requirements and risks applicable to general contractors, which include management of licensing, permitting and quality of our third-party installers. If we fail to manage these processes effectively or provide proper oversight of these services, we could suffer lost sales, fines and lawsuits, as well as damage to our reputation, which could adversely affect our business.

Product liability, warranty, casualty, construction defect, contract, tort, employment and other claims can be expensive to defend and can divert the attention of management and other personnel for significant periods, regardless of the ultimate outcome. Claims of this nature could also have a negative impact on customer confidence in our products and our Company. We cannot assure you that any current or future claims will not adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

 

We may be unable to maintain profitability or positive cash flows from operations.

We have set goals to progressively improve our profitability over time by growing our sales, increasing our gross margin and reducing our expenses as a percentage of sales. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we had net income of $119.7 million, $57.4 million and $30.9 million, respectively, and gross margin of 24.7%, 23.6% and 24.0%, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we generated cash from operations of $210.0 million, $93.9 million, and $106.9 million, respectively. There can be no assurance that we will achieve our profitability goals or continue to generate positive cash flow from operations. Factors that could significantly adversely affect our efforts to achieve these goals include, but are not limited to, the failure to:

Any of these failures or delays may adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase our profitability.

Our continued success will depend on our ability to retain our key employees and to attract and retain new qualified employees, while controlling our labor costs.

Our success depends in part on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain qualified managerial, operational, sales and other personnel, while at the same time controlling our labor costs. We face significant competition for these types of employees in our industry and from other industries. Labor shortages may impact our ability to hire skilled or unskilled workers with experience in carpentry, construction or fabrication. We may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining the personnel we require to conduct and expand our operations successfully. In addition, key personnel, including sales force employees with key customer relationships, may leave us and compete against us.

Our success also depends to a significant extent on the continued service of our senior management team. Our officers and divisional vice presidents have experience in manufacturing, distribution, retail and homebuilding, and have been integral to our successful acquisition and integration of businesses to gain scale in our current markets. The loss of any member of our senior management

Our ability to control labor costs is subject to numerous external factors, including prevailing wage rates, the impact of legislation or regulations governing wages, regulations governing payment of workers on a “piece-work” or “piece-rate” basis, labor relations, healthcare benefits, and health and other insurance costs. In addition, we compete with other companies for many of our employees in hourly and piece-rate positions, and we invest significant resources in training and motivating them to maintain a high level of job satisfaction. These positions have historically had high turnover rates, which can lead to increased training and retention costs. If we are unable to attract or retain highly qualified employees in the future, it could adversely impact our operating results.

Product shortages, loss of key suppliers or failure to develop relationships with qualified suppliers, and our dependence on third-party suppliers and manufacturers could affect our financial health.

Our ability to offer a wide variety of products to our customers is dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate product supply from manufacturers and other suppliers. Generally, our products are obtainable from various sources and in sufficient quantities. Our ability to continue to identify and develop relationships with qualified suppliers who can satisfy our high standards for quality and our need to access products in a timely and efficient manner is a significant challenge. Our ability to access products also can be adversely affected by the financial instability of suppliers (particularly in light of continuing economic difficulties in various regions of the United States and the world), suppliers’ noncompliance with applicable laws, tariffs and import duties, supply disruptions, shipping interruptions or costs, and other factors beyond our control. The loss of, or a substantial decrease in the availability of, products from our suppliers or the loss of key supplier arrangements could adversely impact our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Although in many instances we have agreements with our suppliers, these agreements are generally terminable by either party on limited notice. Many of our suppliers also offer us favorable terms based on the volume of our purchases. If market conditions change, suppliers may stop offering us favorable terms. Failure by our suppliers to continue to supply us with products on favorable terms, commercially reasonable terms, or at all, could put pressure on our operating margins or have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

A portion of the workforces of many of our suppliers, particularly our foreign suppliers, are represented by labor unions. Workforce disputes at these suppliers may result in work stoppages or slowdowns. Such disruptions could have a material adverse effect on these suppliers ability to continue meeting our needs.

The implementation of our supply chain and technology initiatives could disrupt our operations, and these initiatives might not provide the anticipated benefits or might fail.

We have made, and we plan to continue to make, significant investments in our supply chain and technology. These initiatives are designed to streamline our operations to allow our employees to continue to provide high quality service to our customers, while simplifying customer interaction and providing our customers with a more interconnected purchasing experience. The cost and potential problems and interruptions associated with the implementation of these initiatives, including those associated with managing third-party service providers and employing new web-based tools and services, could disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations. In the event that we grow very rapidly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to keep up, expand or adapt our IT infrastructure to meet evolving demand on a timely basis and at a commercially reasonable cost, or at all. In addition, our improved supply chain and new or upgraded technology might not provide the anticipated benefits, it might take longer than expected to realize the anticipated benefits or the initiatives might fail altogether.

We occupy many of our facilities under long-term non-cancellable leases. If we close a facility, we are still obligated under the applicable lease. We may be unable to renew leases at the end of their terms.

Many of our facilities are located in leased premises. Many of our current leases are non-cancellable and typically have initial terms ranging from five to ten years, and most provide options to renew for specified periods of time. We believe that leases we enter into in the future will likely be long-term and non-cancellable and have similar renewal options. If we close or idle a facility, most likely we remain committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease, which would include, among other things, payment of the base rent, insurance, taxes and other expenses on the leased property for the balance of the lease term. The inability to terminate leases when idling a facility or exiting a geographic market can have a significant adverse impact on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

In addition, at the end of the lease term and any renewal period for a facility, we may be unable to renew the lease without substantial additional cost, if at all. If we are unable to renew our facility leases, we may close or relocate a facility, which could subject us

We may be unable to effectively manage our inventory and working capital as our sales volume increases, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We purchase certain materials, including lumber products, which are then sold to customers as well as used as direct production inputs for our manufactured and prefabricated products. We must maintain, and have adequate working capital to purchase, sufficient inventory to meet customer demand. Due to the lead times required by our suppliers, we order products in advance of expected sales. This requires us to forecast our sales and purchases accordingly. In periods of growth, it can be especially difficult to forecast sales accurately. We must also manage our working capital to fund our inventory purchases. In the future, if we are unable to manage effectively our inventory and working capital as we attempt to grow our business, our cash flows may be negatively affected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

The majority of our net sales are credit sales that are made primarily to customers whose ability to pay is dependent, in part, upon the economic strength of the industry and geographic areas in which they operate, and the failure to collect or timely collect monies owed from customers could adversely affect us.

The majority of our net sales volume in fiscal 2018 was facilitated through the extension of credit to our customers whose ability to pay is dependent, in part, upon the economic strength of the industry in the areas where they operate. We offer credit to customers, either through unsecured credit that is based solely upon the creditworthiness of the customer, or secured credit for materials sold for a specific job where the security lies in lien rights associated with the material going into the job. The type of credit offered depends both on the financial strength of the customer and the nature of the business in which the customer is involved. End users, resellers and other non-contractor customers generally purchase more on unsecured credit than secured credit. During the housing downturn, several of our homebuilder customers defaulted on amounts owed to us or extended their payable days as a result of their financial condition. The inability of our customers to pay off their credit lines in a timely manner, or at all, would adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Furthermore, our collections efforts with respect to non-paying or slow-paying customers could negatively impact our customer relations going forward.

Because we depend on the creditworthiness of certain of our customers, if the financial condition of our customers declines, our credit risk could increase. Significant contraction in our markets, coupled with tightened credit availability and financial institution underwriting standards, could adversely affect certain of our customers. Should one or more of our larger customers declare bankruptcy as has occurred in the past, it could adversely affect the collectability of our accounts receivable, bad debt reserves and net income.

We may not timely identify or effectively respond to consumer needs, expectations, market conditions or trends, which could adversely affect our relationship with customers, the demand for our products and services and our market share.

It is difficult to predict successfully the products and services our customers will demand. The success of our business depends in part on our ability to identify and respond promptly to changes in demographics, consumer preferences, expectations, needs and weather conditions, while also managing inventory levels. For example, an increased consumer focus on making homes energy efficient could require us to offer more energy efficient building materials and there can be no assurance that we would be able to identify appropriate suppliers on acceptable terms. Failure to identify timely or effectively respond to changing consumer

preferences, expectations and building product needs could adversely affect our relationship with customers, the demand for our products and services and our market share.

Because we cannot immediately adapt our production capacity and related cost structures to rapidly changing market conditions, when demand is below our expectations, our manufacturing capacity will likely exceed our production requirements. If, during a general market upturn or an upturn in one of our geographic markets, we cannot increase our manufacturing capacity to meet product demand, we will not be able to fulfill orders in a timely manner, which could lead to order cancellations, contract breaches or indemnification obligations. This inability could materially and adversely limit our ability to improve our results. By contrast, if during an economic downturn we had excess manufacturing capacity, then our fixed costs associated with excess manufacturing capacity could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

We may be unable to successfully implement our growth strategy, which includes pursuing strategic acquisitions and opening new facilities.

Our long-term business plan provides for continued growth through strategic acquisitions and organic growth through the construction of new facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. Failure to identify and acquire suitable acquisition candidates on acceptable terms could have a material adverse effect on our growth strategy. Moreover, any future reduced operating results as we experienced during the housing downturn, our liquidity position or the requirements of the Second Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) could prevent us from obtaining the capital required to effect new acquisitions or expansions of existing facilities. Our failure to make successful acquisitions or to build or expand facilities, including manufacturing facilities, produce saleable product or meet customer demand in a timely manner could result in damage to or loss of customer relationships, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Federal, state, local and other regulations could impose substantial costs and/or restrictions on our operations that would reduce our net income.

We are subject to various federal, state, local and other regulations, including, among other things, regulations promulgated by the DOT, work safety regulations promulgated by OSHA, employment regulations promulgated by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, regulations of the United States Department of Labor, federal and state environmental regulations, and state and local zoning restrictions, building codes and contractors’ licensing regulations. More burdensome regulatory requirements in these or other areas may increase our general and administrative costs and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Moreover, failure to comply with the regulatory requirements applicable to our business could expose us to litigation and/or substantial penalties that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

    

Our transportation operations are subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the DOT. The DOT has broad administrative powers with respect to our transportation operations. More restrictive limitations on vehicle weight and size, trailer length and configuration, or driver hours of service would increase our costs, which, if we are unable to pass these cost increases on to our customers, may increase our selling, general and administrative expenses and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. If we fail to comply adequately with DOT regulations or regulations become more stringent, we could experience increased inspections, regulatory authorities could take remedial action including imposing fines or shutting down our operations or we could be subject to increased audit and compliance costs. If any of these events were to occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be adversely affected.

In addition, the homebuilding industry is subject to various local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, codes, rules and regulations concerning zoning, building design and safety, construction, energy conservation, environmental protection and similar matters, including regulations that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements on our business or that limit the number of homes that can be built within the boundaries of a particular area. Regulatory restrictions may increase our operating expenses and limit the availability of suitable building lots for our customers, which could negatively affect our sales and earnings.

Changes in legislation and government policy may have a material adverse effect on us.

The 2016 presidential and congressional elections in the United States, as well as the 2018 midterm elections, have resulted in uncertainty with respect to, and could result in significant changes in, legislation and government policy. Specific legislative and regulatory proposals discussed during and after these elections that could have a material impact on us include, but are not limited to, modifications to international trade policy and increased regulation related to the employment of foreign workers.

Immigration reform and enforcement continues to attract significant attention in the public arena, the United States Congress and at the state and local levels. We rely in part on a seasonal workforce which requires specific types of visas to enter the United States. If new or more restrictive immigration legislation is enacted at the federal level or in states in which we do business, or if

existing regulations are interpreted or enforced differently, these changes could make it more difficult or costly for us to hire United States citizens and/or legal immigrant workers. In such cases, we may incur additional costs to run our business, including to find and hire replacement workers, or may have to change the way we conduct our operations, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“2017 Tax Act”) was enacted during December 2017, which, among other provisions, limits mortgage interest and state and local tax deductions, including property taxes and state income taxes, which may affect demand for new homes. The limitation on state and local tax deductions may have a greater impact in high tax states such as California, which accounted for approximately 14% of our 2018 net sales. Future changes in federal income tax laws may also affect demand for new homes. From time to time, various proposals are discussed, which, if enacted, may have an adverse effect on the homebuilding industry in general. No meaningful prediction can be made as to whether any such proposals will be enacted and,

Unanticipated changes in our tax provisions, the adoption of new tax legislation or exposure to additional tax liabilities could affect our financial performance.

We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States. We are subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. We regularly assess the likely outcome of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision. However, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcome of these audits, and the amounts ultimately paid upon resolution of audits could be materially different from the amounts previously included in our income tax expense and therefore could have a material impact on our tax provision, net income and cash flows. In addition, our effective tax rate in the future could be adversely affected by changes to our operating structure, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws, and the discovery of new information in the course of our tax return preparation.

As of December 31, 2018, we had a net deferred tax liability of $3.0 million. The carrying value of our deferred tax assets is dependent on our ability to generate future taxable income in the United States. Future changes in tax legislation could have a significant adverse effect on our tax rate or the carrying value of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. Any of these changes could affect our financial performance.

We may not be able to utilize certain of our net operating loss carryforwards, which could harm our profitability.

We have net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards to reduce future taxable income. As of December 31, 2018, we had NOL carryforwards to reduce future U.S. federal and state taxable income of $77.9 million and $75.1 million, respectively. Utilization of our NOL carryforwards may be subject to a substantial limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 382”), and comparable provisions of state tax laws, due to changes in ownership of our company that may occur in the future. Under Section 382 and comparable provisions of state tax laws, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50% change by value in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to carry forward its pre-change net operating losses to reduce its post-change income may be limited. We may experience ownership changes in the future as a result of future changes in our stock ownership. As a result, our ability to use our pre-change NOL carryforwards to reduce U.S. federal and state taxable income we produce in the future years may be subject to limitations, which could result in increased future tax liability to us.

We may be adversely affected by any natural or man-made disruptions to our distribution and manufacturing facilities.

We currently maintain a broad network of distribution and manufacturing facilities throughout the eastern, southern and western United States. Any widespread disruption to our facilities resulting from fire, earthquake, hurricanes and other weather-related events, an act of terrorism, labor disputes, supply chain disruptions or any other cause could damage a significant portion of our inventory and could materially impair our ability to manufacture and distribute our products to customers. We could incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with distributing our products to our customers during the time that it takes for us to reopen or replace a damaged facility. In addition, any shortages of fuel or significant fuel cost increases could disrupt our ability to distribute products to our customers. Disruptions to the national or local transportation infrastructure systems may also affect our ability to keep our operations and services functioning properly. If any of these events were to occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

We are subject to exposure to environmental liabilities and are subject to environmental regulation.

We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, including those promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and analogous state agencies. As current and former owners, lessees and

operators of real property, we can be held liable for the investigation or remediation of contamination at or from such properties, in some circumstances irrespective of whether we knew of or caused such contamination. No assurance can be provided that investigation and remediation will not be required in the future as a result of spills or releases of petroleum products or hazardous substances, the discovery of currently unknown environmental conditions, more stringent standards regarding existing contamination, or changes in legislation, laws, ordinances, rules or regulations or their interpretation or enforcement. Liabilities under these or similar regulations or more burdensome environmental regulatory requirements may increase our costs and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

We are subject to health and safety laws and regulations and any failure to comply with any current or future laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on us.

Manufacturing and building sites are inherently dangerous workplaces. Our work sites often put our employees and others in close proximity with large pieces of mechanized equipment, moving vehicles, manufacturing processes, and heavy products. As a result, we are subject to a variety of health and safety laws and regulations dealing with occupational health and safety. Unsafe work sites have the potential to increase employee turnover and raise our operating costs. Our safety record can also impact our reputation. We maintain functional groups whose primary purpose is to ensure we implement effective work procedures throughout our organization and take other steps to ensure the health and safety of our work force, but there can be no assurances these measures will be successful in preventing injuries or violations of health and safety laws and regulations. Any failure to maintain safe work sites or violations of applicable law could expose us to significant financial losses and reputational harm, as well as civil and criminal liabilities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

We may be adversely affected by any disruption in our information technology systems.

Our operations are dependent upon our IT systems, which encompass all of our major business functions. A substantial disruption in our IT systems for any prolonged time period (arising from, for example, system capacity limits from unexpected increases in our volume of business, outages, computer viruses, unauthorized access or delays in our service) could result in delays in receiving inventory and supplies or filling customer orders and adversely affect our customer service and relationships. Our systems might be damaged or interrupted by natural or man-made events or by computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, or similar disruptions affecting the global Internet. Such delays, problems or costs may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

We are subject to cybersecurity risks that could adversely affect us, and we may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks.

Our business relies on systems, including those of third parties with whom we do business, and a website that involve the storage and transmission of customers’ and employees’ personal and proprietary information. Our systems and those of third parties with whom we do business have been, and will likely continue to be, subjected to computer viruses or other malicious codes, unauthorized access attempts and cyber-attacks that include phishing-attacks, denial-of-service attacks, ransomware, malware and hacking. Further, as our eCommerce business expands, our increased visibility and role in accepting electronic payments may put us at a greater risk of being targeted. Breach of our systems or those of third parties with whom we do business could compromise our confidential information and that of our customers or employees, impede or interrupt our business operations, and may result in other negative financial and other consequences, including remediation costs, loss of revenue, litigation, significant legal and financial exposure, loss of intellectual property and reputational damage.

To date, we have not experienced a material breach of cybersecurity. As cyber-attacks become more sophisticated generally, and as we implement changes such as giving customers greater electronic access to our systems and expanding our eCommerce, we may be required to incur significant costs to strengthen our systems from outside intrusions and/or maintain insurance coverage related to the threat of such attacks. Further, the regulatory environment related to information security and privacy is increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business and those of third parties with whom we do business, and compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs and legal liabilities. Despite our efforts, we may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or prevent rapidly evolving types of cyber-attacks on our systems or those of the third parties with whom we do business. While we have implemented administrative and technical controls such as web filtering, endpoint and storage area network antivirus scanning and isolation, next-generation firewalls, a secure email gateway and mobile device administration, purchased cyber insurance coverage and taken other preventive actions to reduce the risk of cyber incidents and protect our IT, these measures, and other measures we may take in the future, can be expensive, and may be insufficient, circumvented or may become ineffective. Any of the foregoing risks and increased costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Insufficient insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on us.

We carry insurance for general liability, auto liability and workers’ compensation exposures subject to deductibles and/or self-insured retentions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, and we self-insure for employee and eligible dependent health care claims, with insurance purchased from independent carriers to cover individual claims in excess of the self-insured limits. However, our insurance program does not cover, or may not adequately cover, every potential risk associated with our business and the consequences thereof. In addition, market conditions or any significant claim or a number of claims made by or against us could cause our premiums and deductibles to increase substantially and, in some instances, our coverage may be reduced or become entirely unavailable. In the future, we may not be able to obtain meaningful coverage at reasonable rates for a variety of risks, including certain types of environmental hazards and ongoing regulatory compliance. If our insurance coverage is

Operation on multiple ERP information systems, and the conversion from multiple systems to a single system, may negatively impact our operations.

The Company currently operates on multiple ERP systems, which we use for operations representing virtually all of our sales. Certain of our ERP systems are proprietary systems that have been highly customized by our computer programmers. We rely upon our ERP systems to manage and replenish inventory, to fill and ship customer orders on a timely basis, to coordinate our sales and distribution activities across all of our products and services and to provide information for financial reporting purposes.

Processing, consolidating and reconciling information from multiple ERP systems increases the chance of error, and we may incur significant additional costs related thereto. Inconsistencies in the information from multiple ERP systems could adversely impact our ability to manage our business efficiently and may result in heightened risk to our ability to maintain accurate books and records and comply with regulatory requirements.

Since the completion of the Merger, the Company has implemented the ERP system utilized by Legacy SBS (“the Legacy SBS ERP system”) at certain Legacy BMHC and newly acquired locations. If the remaining implementation of the Legacy SBS ERP system across Legacy BMHC and newly acquired operations is not executed successfully, this could result in business interruptions and loss of customers. If we do not complete the remaining implementation timely and successfully, we may also incur additional costs associated with this project and a delay in our ability to improve existing operations, to support future growth and to take advantage of new applications and technologies.

Such projects are inherently complex, resource intensive, and lengthy. As a result, we could experience unplanned or unforeseen issues that could adversely affect the project, our business or our results of operations, including:

Any of the foregoing could materially and negatively impact our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or the industry, expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of our variable rate debt and prevent us from meeting our obligations under our indebtedness.

Our indebtedness includes obligations under the senior secured notes due 2024 (the “Senior Notes”) and our revolving credit facility (excluding unamortized debt issuance costs) under the Credit Agreement, as well as obligations under capital leases. As of December 31, 2018, our total debt was $365.5 million. This leverage could have important consequences, including: making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness; increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; requiring us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development efforts, and other general corporate purposes; increasing our vulnerability to and limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates

We are substantially reliant on liquidity provided by the Credit Agreement and cash on hand to provide working capital and fund our operations. Our working capital and capital expenditure requirements are likely to grow as the housing market improves and we execute our strategic growth plan. Economic and credit market conditions, the performance of the homebuilding industry, and our financial performance, as well as other factors, may constrain our financing abilities. Our ability to secure additional financing, if available, and to satisfy our financial obligations under indebtedness outstanding from time to time will depend upon our future operating performance, the availability of credit, economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

We may be unable to secure additional financing or financing on favorable terms or our operating cash flow may be insufficient to satisfy our financial obligations under our outstanding indebtedness. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of additional equity or convertible debt securities, our stockholders may experience significant dilution. We may also incur additional indebtedness in the future, including collateralized debt, subject to the restrictions contained in the Credit Agreement and indenture governing the Senior Notes (the “Indenture”). If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

The Credit Agreement and Indenture contain various covenants that could limit our ability to operate our business.

The Credit Agreement and Indenture place limitations on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur debt, create other liens on its assets, make investments, sell assets, pay dividends, undertake transactions with affiliates, enter into merger transactions and enter into unrelated businesses. The Credit Agreement also contains a financial covenant requiring us and our subsidiaries to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined therein, of at least 1.00:1.00 at the end of any fiscal quarter during the period from the date that Excess Availability, as defined therein, under the Credit Agreement is less than or equal to the greater of (1) $33.3 million and (2) 10.0% of the Line Cap under the Credit Agreement, as defined therein, until the date that Excess Availability has been greater than the greater of (i) $33.3 million and (ii) 10.0% of the Line Cap for a period of at least 30 consecutive days. The Credit Agreement and Indenture also contain various customary representations and warranties, financial and collateral reporting requirements and other affirmative and negative covenants. Amounts owed under the Credit Agreement and Indenture may be accelerated and the lenders may exercise other remedies available to them upon the occurrence of various events of default set forth in the Credit Agreement and Indenture, including the failure to make principal or interest payments when due, breaches of covenants, representations and warranties set forth in the Credit Agreement and Indenture and defaults under other debt obligations. Acceleration of amounts owed under the Credit Agreement or the Indenture, or the exercise of other remedies available to holders of our debt, could materially and negatively impact our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

Volatility in the market price of our common stock may prevent you from being able to sell your shares of our common stock at or above the price you paid for them. The market price for our common stock could fluctuate significantly for various reasons, including but not limited to:

In addition, in recent years, the stock market has regularly experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant impact on the market price of securities issued by many companies, including companies in our industry. The changes have at times occurred without regard to the operating performance of the affected companies. Hence, the price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with us and these fluctuations could materially impact our share price.

We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock.

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. In addition, our existing indebtedness restricts, and we anticipate our future indebtedness may restrict, our ability to pay dividends. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board and will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition, operating results, projections, cash flows, earnings, legal requirements, restrictions in our indebtedness and agreements governing any other indebtedness we may enter into and other factors that our Board deems relevant. Accordingly, holders of our common stock may need to sell their shares to realize a return on their investment, and may not be able to sell their shares at or above the price paid for them.

Our future operating results may fluctuate significantly and our current operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance. Fluctuations in our financial results could affect our stock price in the future.

Our revenues and operating results have historically varied from period-to-period and we expect that they will continue to do so as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. Any volatility in our financial results may make it more difficult for us to raise capital in the future or pursue acquisitions that involve issuances of our stock. Our operating results for prior periods may not be effective predictors of future performance.

Factors associated with our industry, the operation of our business and the markets for our products and services may cause our quarterly financial results to fluctuate, including:

Any one of the factors above or the cumulative effect of some of the factors referred to above may result in significant fluctuations in our financial and other operating results, including fluctuations in our key metrics. The variability and unpredictability could result in our failing to meet our internal operating plan or the expectations of securities analysts or investors for any period. This

volatility could cause the market price of our shares to fall substantially and we could face costly lawsuits, including securities class action suits.

Certain provisions of our organizational documents and other contractual provisions may make it difficult for stockholders to change the composition of our Board of Directors and may discourage hostile takeover attempts.

Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “Charter”) and amended and restated bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control if our Board determines that such changes in control are not in the best interests of us and our stockholders. The provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws include, among other things, the following:

While these provisions have the effect of encouraging persons seeking to acquire control of us to negotiate with our Board, they could enable the Board to hinder or frustrate a transaction that some, or a majority, of the stockholders might believe to be in their best interests and, in that case, may prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.

These provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our Board, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management.

Failure to maintain effective internal controlscontrol in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or to remediate any existing material weakness, could have a material adverse effect on us and our stock price.

annually a report by management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected. Therefore, our internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud.

Any failure to maintain internal control over financial reporting, or any failure to fully remediate the existing or any future material weaknesses that may be found to exist, could severely inhibit the Company’sour ability to accurately and on a timely basis report itsour cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.condition in compliance with applicable securities laws. If the Company iswe are unable to conclude that itsour internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if itsour independent registered public accounting firm determines the Company has

Our Charter includes an exclusive forum clause, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.

Our Charter provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action brought on behalf of the Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owned by any director, officer or other employee of the Company to the Company or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, our Charter or our bylaws or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the foregoing provisions. The exclusive forum clause may limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us. It is also possible that, notwithstanding such exclusive forum clause, a court could rule that such a provision is inapplicable or unenforceable.

We are a holding company and depend on the cash flow of our subsidiaries.

We are a holding company with no material assets other than the equity interests of our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries conduct substantially all of our operations and own substantially all of our assets. Consequently, our cash flow and our ability to meet our obligations and pay any future dividends to our stockholders depends upon the cash flow of our subsidiaries and their ability to make payments, directly or indirectly, to us in the form of dividends, distributions and other payments. Any inability on the part of our subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

PART II

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BMC Stock Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained,did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.COSO because a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the approval and issuance of debit memos and the application of customer payments to accounts receivable balances, and inadequate segregation of duties over the ability to create debit memos and apply customer payments by certain employees responsible for establishing and monitoring the valuation of accounts receivable balances existed as of that date.

The Company’sCompany's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s annualmanagement’s report on internal control over financial reporting appearing under Item 9A.referred to above. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(All amounts are presented in thousands except share and per share amounts.)

These financial statements represent the financial statements of BMC Stock Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiaries. All references to “BMC” or the “Company” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K mean BMC Stock Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

The Company distributes lumber and building materials to new construction and repair and remodeling contractors. Additionally, the Company provides solution-based services to its customers, including component design, product specification and installation services.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in conformity with U.S generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of BMC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company evaluates these estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and bases its estimates on historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities as well as identifying and assessing the accounting treatment with respect to commitments and contingencies. The significant estimates which could change by a material amount in the near term include revenue recognition for construction services, accounts receivable reserves, estimated losses on uncompleted contracts and changes in contract estimates, inventory reserves, supplier rebates, goodwill impairment, impairment of property and equipment, insurance reserves, warranties and share-based compensation. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company maintains cash at financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits. Accounts receivable potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk. Mitigating this credit risk is collateral underlying certain accounts receivable (perfected liens or lien rights) as well as the Company’s analysis of a customer’s credit history prior to extending credit. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the Company’s large number of customers and their dispersion across various regions of the United States. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, no customer represented more than 10% of accounts receivable. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, no customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue.

The Company’s future results could be adversely affected by a number of factors including competitive pressure on sales and pricing, weather conditions, consumer spending and debt levels, interest rates, existing residential home sales and new home construction, lumber prices and product mix.

Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have a maturity of three months or less from the time of purchase. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had cash equivalents of $146.1 million and $0, respectively. Cash equivalents are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments, and was classified as a Level 1 or Level 2 measurement in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”).

Book overdrafts occur when purchases on corporate purchasing cards and checks written exceed available bank balances at a specific bank, despite there being cash at the Company’s other financial institutions. For accounting purposes, the Company reclassifies these book overdrafts to accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets. Book overdrafts included in accounts payable were $0.1 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

ASC 820 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument is categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation.

Accounts receivable result from the extending of credit to trade customers for the purchase of goods and services. The terms generally provide for payment within 30 days of being invoiced. On occasion, when necessary to compete in certain circumstances, the Company will sell product under extended payment terms. Accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on an assessment of individual past due accounts, historical write-off experience, accounts receivable aging, customer disputes and the business environment. Account balances are charged off when the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company grants trade discounts on a percentage basis. The Company records an allowance against accounts receivable for the amount of discounts it estimates will be taken by customers. The discounts are recorded as a reduction to revenue when products are sold.

The Company enters into agreements with many of its suppliers providing for inventory purchase rebates (“supplier rebates”) upon achievement of specified volume purchasing levels. Supplier rebates are accrued as part of cost of goods sold based on progress towards earning the supplier rebates, taking into consideration cumulative purchases of inventory to date and projected purchases through the end of the year. The Company estimates the rebates applicable to inventory on-hand at each period end based on the estimated percentage of supplier rebates to be earned. The Company also receives consideration from suppliers to promote their products (“marketing and advertising allowances”), which are accrued as part of cost of goods sold or selling, general and administrative expenses, depending on the nature of the allowance. Total rebates and marketing and advertising allowances receivable at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $18.0 million and $23.3 million, respectively, included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account in Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as amended (“Topic 606”). The Company’s building products contracts typically contain a promise to supply multiple distinct products and thus, they generally contain multiple performance obligations under Topic 606. Depending on the nature of the promises within the Company’s construction services contracts and whether they are distinct under Topic 606, there may be a single performance obligation or multiple performance

obligations. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation based on the standalone selling price of each distinct good or service, which is generally determined based on the prices charged to customers.

The Company recognizes revenue for its building products contracts when control of the promised goods (the performance obligations) is transferred to the Company’s customers. This generally occurs at a point in time when the products are delivered and the customer obtains physical possession, legal title and the risks and rewards of ownership. However, for certain product offerings, products are customized to customer specifications and the customer benefits from the Company’s performance over time as deliveries are made. As such, the Company has determined that an output method based on units delivered best depicts the transfer of control to the customer.

The Company generally recognizes revenue for its construction services contracts over time using cost based input methods. Periodic estimates of progress towards completion are made based on either a comparison of labor costs incurred to date with total estimated contract labor costs or total costs incurred to date with total estimated contract costs. Incurred costs represent work performed, which correspond and best depict transfer of control to the customer.

Contract revenues and contract costs to be recognized are dependent on the accuracy of estimates, including quantities of materials, labor productivity and other cost estimates. Historically, the Company has made reasonable estimates of the extent of progress towards completion and contract completion costs. Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, it is possible that actual completion costs may vary from estimates. Revenue recognized for performance obligations satisfied over time for the year ended December 31, 2018 represented approximately 26% of total revenues.

Estimated losses on uncompleted contracts and changes in contract estimates reflect the Company’s best estimate of probable losses of unbilled receivables, and are recognized in the period such revisions are known and can be reasonably estimated. These estimates are recognized in cost of sales. Estimated losses on uncompleted contracts and changes in contract estimates are established by assessing estimated costs to complete, change orders and claims for uncompleted contracts. Assumptions for estimated costs to complete include material prices, labor costs, labor productivity and contract claims. Such estimates are inherently uncertain and it is possible that actual completion costs may vary from these estimates.

All sales recognized are net of allowances for discounts and estimated returns, based on historical experience. Taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are directly imposed on the Company’s revenue-producing transactions are excluded from sales. The Company accounts for shipping and handling costs associated with its contracts as a fulfillment cost and expenses these as incurred within selling, general and administrative expenses.

The timing of revenue recognition, invoicing and cash collection affects receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. For building products contracts that contain performance obligations satisfied at a point in time, the Company recognizes revenue upon satisfaction of the performance obligation and then bills the customer, resulting in a receivable. For building products contracts that contain performance obligations satisfied over time, the Company recognizes revenue as the performance obligation is satisfied, but prior to billing, resulting in an unbilled receivable, as the Company has an unconditional right to payment.

For the Company’s construction services contracts, amounts are generally billed as work progresses in accordance with agreed-upon contractual terms. Revenue is also recognized over time as the performance obligations are satisfied, which can result in contract assets and liabilities, on a contract-by-contract basis, due to timing differences between billing and revenue recognition. Contract assets include unbilled amounts when the revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer. Conversely, contract liabilities include amounts that have been billed to the customer in excess of the revenue recognized.

At times, the Company will have a right to payment from previous performance that is conditional on something other than passage of time, such as retainage, which creates a contract asset. Conversely, the Company may receive advances from customers prior to the Company’s performance, which creates a contract liability.

Contract assets are reclassified to a receivable when the right to consideration becomes unconditional. The Company’s terms generally provide for payment within 30 days of being invoiced. On occasion, when necessary to compete in certain circumstances, the Company will offer extended payment terms, which do not exceed one year.

The Company includes shipping and handling costs in selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation expense on the consolidated statements of operations. Shipping and handling costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses were $189.6 million, $172.2 million and $152.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Shipping and handling costs included in depreciation expense were $22.9 million, $24.8 million and $20.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for renewals and betterments, which extend the useful lives of assets, are capitalized while maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Property and equipment obtained through acquisition are stated at estimated fair market value as of the acquisition date, and are depreciated over their estimated remaining useful lives, which may differ from the Company’s stated policies for certain assets. Gains and losses related to the sale of property and equipment are recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses.

Property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method and are generally depreciated over the following estimated service lives:

    

Property and equipment that is expected to be sold within the next twelve months, is actively marketed in its current condition for a price that is reasonable in comparison to its estimated fair value and meets other relevant held-for-sale criteria are classified as assets held for sale. Assets held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell and are no longer depreciated. An impairment for assets held for sale is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable. Assets held for sale were not presented separately and were classified as other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets and were $1.3 million and $2.3 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

At least annually, or more frequently as changes in circumstances indicate, the Company tests goodwill for impairment. To the extent that the carrying value of the net assets of any of the reporting units having goodwill is greater than their estimated fair value, the Company may be required to record impairment charges. The Company’s five operating segments, which have been determined to be the Company’s reporting units, are the Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, Texas, Intermountain and Western divisions. The chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) reviews aggregate information to allocate resources and assess performance. Based on the CODM’s review, as well as the similar economic characteristics, nature of products, distribution methods and customers of the divisions, the Company has aggregated its operating segments into one reportable segment. The Company is required to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding the fair value of the reporting units containing goodwill when assessing for impairment. Changes in the fact patterns underlying such assumptions and estimates could ultimately result in the recognition of additional impairment losses.

The Company completes its annual impairment assessment during the third quarter of each year. The Company did not recognize any impairment for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The Company may consider qualitative factors as part of its annual impairment assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. If the Company’s qualitative assessment indicates that goodwill impairment is more likely than not, the Company performs the two-step impairment test. Alternatively, the Company may bypass the qualitative test and initiate goodwill impairment testing with the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. During the first step of the goodwill impairment test, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value, including goodwill. The Company may derive a reporting unit’s fair value through a combination of the market approach (a guideline transaction method) and the income approach. The income approach uses a reporting unit’s projection of estimated future cash flows that is discounted at a market derived weighted average cost of capital. The projection uses management’s best estimates of economic and market conditions over the projected period including growth rates in sales, costs, estimates of future expected changes in operating margins and cash expenditures.

If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, then the Company concludes no goodwill impairment has occurred. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment

test to measure possible goodwill impairment loss. During the second step, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is compared to the carrying value of its goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, the Company would recognize an impairment loss in an amount equal to the excess, not to exceed the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill.

Acquired intangible assets other than goodwill are amortized over their weighted average amortization period unless they are determined to be indefinite. Acquired intangible assets are carried at cost, less accumulated amortization. For intangible assets purchased in a business combination, the estimated fair values of the assets received are used to establish the carrying value. The fair value of acquired intangible assets is determined using common valuation techniques, and the Company employs assumptions developed using the perspective of a market participant.

Long-lived assets, such as property, equipment and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For impairment testing of long-lived assets, the Company identifies asset groups at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company’s board of directors authorized a $75.0 million share repurchase program. Repurchases may be made at management’s discretion from time to time on the open market, subject to applicable laws, or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program will expire on November 20, 2019 or may be suspended or discontinued at any time. During the year ended December 31, 2018, utilizing cash from operations, the Company repurchased 0.2 million shares at a weighted average price of $15.91 per share for a total cost of $2.9 million. These repurchased shares are available for future issuance and are reflected as treasury stock, at cost, on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had approximately $72.1 million of capacity remaining under the current share repurchase authorization. Subsequent to December 31, 2018, the Company repurchased 0.7 million shares at a weighted average price of $16.82 per share for a total cost of $11.5 million.

Employees have the option to surrender shares to the Company to satisfy their tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards. These surrendered shares are reflected as treasury stock, at cost, on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Merger and integration costs related to the ongoing integration of Building Materials Holding Corporation (“BMHC”) and Stock Building Supply Holdings, Inc. (“SBS”), as a result of the 2015 merger transaction, consist primarily of severance, rebranding, system integration costs and professional fees.

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), which requires an asset and liability approach for measuring deferred taxes based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities existing at each balance sheet date using enacted tax rates for years in which taxes are expected to be paid or recovered.

The Company evaluates its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis to determine whether a valuation allowance is required. In accordance with ASC 740, the Company assesses whether a valuation allowance should be established based on its determination of whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends primarily on: (i) the Company’s ability to carry back net operating losses to tax years where it has previously paid income taxes based on applicable federal law; (ii) the timing of the reversal of deferred tax liabilities and (iii) the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income during the periods in which the related deferred tax assets are deductible. The assessment of a valuation allowance includes giving appropriate consideration to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax asset. This assessment considers, among other things, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, the Company’s experience with operating loss and tax credit carryforwards not expiring unused and tax planning alternatives. Significant judgment

is required in determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and/or tax returns. Actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could differ materially from the outcomes that the Company currently anticipates.

ASC 740 defines the methodology for recognizing the benefits of uncertain tax return positions as well as guidance regarding the measurement of the resulting tax benefits. These provisions require an enterprise to recognize the financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more likely than not, which is defined as a likelihood of more than 50%, based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. The evaluation of whether a tax position meets the more likely than not recognition threshold requires a substantial degree of judgment by management based on the individual facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from estimates. The Company had no material uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2018.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities and unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

The Company carries insurance for general liability, auto liability and workers’ compensation exposures subject to deductibles or self-insured retentions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, and the Company self-insures for employee and eligible dependent health care claims, with insurance purchased from independent carriers to cover individual claims in excess of the self-insured limits. The expected liability for unpaid claims, including incurred but not reported losses, is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as a liability with current and long-term components. The amount recoverable from insurance providers is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Provisions for losses are developed from actuarial valuations that rely upon the Company’s past claims experience, which considers both the frequency and settlement of claims. The casualty and health insurance liabilities are recorded at their undiscounted value.

In January 2015, the Company entered into a retroactive reinsurance contract to transfer the risk of loss of certain insurance reserves for workers’ compensation claims incurred from 2006 to 2011 to a reinsurer. Pursuant to the reinsurance contract, the reinsurer is obligated to pay an aggregate maximum of $17.5 million for these claims with any excess borne by the Company. The Company maintains the insurance reserves related to these claims as a liability on its consolidated balance sheet with an offsetting reinsurance receivable, which includes current and long-term components. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the carrying value of the insurance reserves related to these claims and the offsetting reinsurance receivable was $3.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively. Changes in these claims are recorded as an increase or decrease in the insurance reserves and corresponding increase or decrease in the reinsurance receivable. Additionally, the Company monitors the financial condition of the reinsurer to minimize its exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvency.

The Company sponsors a defined contribution retirement savings plan. The Company has recorded expense of $5.9 million, $5.2 million and $4.6 million related to employer contributions for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These expenses are recorded to either selling, general and administrative expenses or cost of sales on the consolidated statements of operations, depending on the classification of the employee.

The Company recognizes lease obligations with fixed escalations of rental payments on a straight-line basis over the lease term, with the amount of rental expense in excess of lease payments recorded as a deferred rent liability. Lease incentives received are also recorded as a deferred rent liability and are amortized as reductions to rent expense over the lease term. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had a deferred rent liability of $5.0 million and $4.2 million, respectively, included in accrued expenses and other liabilities and other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

Costs associated with advertising and promoting products and services are expensed in the period incurred. Cooperative advertising allowances that are reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to promote vendors’ products are recorded as an offset against advertising expenses in selling, general and administrative expenses. If those conditions are not met, the cooperative advertising allowances are recorded as a reduction in inventory and a subsequent reduction in cost of goods sold when the related product is sold. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded $4.9 million, $5.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively, of advertising and promotion expenses, net of cooperative advertising allowances, in selling, general and administrative expenses.

In accordance with the requirements of ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), the Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees using a fair value based pricing model. The compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period, using graded vesting.

Costs incurred in connection with the Company’s revolving line of credit and senior secured notes are capitalized and amortized over the term of the applicable agreement. Total debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization, were $6.4 million and $8.1 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Debt issuance costs related to the Company’s revolving line of credit and senior secured notes are included in other long-term assets and long-term debt, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization of debt issuance costs for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $3.1 million, respectively, and is included in interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company will occasionally enter into derivative instruments to offset existing or expected risks associated with fluctuations in commodity prices. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the Company’s balance sheets at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges or that do not meet the hedge accounting criteria are reported in earnings. The Company elected not to designate any new derivative instruments as hedges for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 or 2016, and therefore, all changes in the fair market value of the derivative instruments have been reported in cost of goods sold on the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company has warranty obligations with respect to most manufactured products. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had warranty liabilities of $2.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively, included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

Comprehensive income is equal to the net income for all periods presented.

Proceeds from revolving line of credit and Repayments of proceeds from revolving line of credit as presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows includes all cash activities and transactions between the Company and its associated lenders in relation to the revolving line of credit, excluding interest and fees, and is specifically inclusive of operating cash receipts which are automatically applied to the revolving line of credit pursuant to a cash sweep agreement. See Note 9 for further details on the Company’s revolving line of credit.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Topic 606. Topic 606 provides a comprehensive revenue recognition model requiring companies to recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. The Company adopted Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method. See Note 11 for further details.

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 was issued to decrease the diversity in practice of how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows by providing guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. Retrospective application is required. ASU 2016-15 became effective for the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires that the statement of cash flows include restricted cash in the beginning and end-of-period total amounts shown and that the statement of cash flows explain the changes in restricted cash during the period.

Retrospective application is required. ASU 2016-18 became effective for the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 provides guidance in determining when a set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business. Prospective application is required. ASU 2017-01 became effective for the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASU 2017-05”). ASU 2017-05 clarifies the scope of Subtopic 610-20, which provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the sale or transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with noncustomers. ASU 2017-05 also provides guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets. ASU 2017-05 became effective for the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”). ASU 2017-09 provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting under ASC 718. ASU 2017-09 is to be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. ASU 2017-09 became effective for the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“ASU 2018-05”). ASU 2018-05 adds paragraphs to the ASC pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which addresses the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a company does not have the necessary information available, prepared or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Tax Act”). ASU 2018-05 provides entities with a one year measurement period from the December 22, 2017 enactment date in order to complete the accounting. The Company recognized a provisional net tax benefit of $3.6 million related to the impact of the 2017 Tax Act during the year ended December 31, 2017. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company completed its accounting for the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act within the measurement period as provided under ASU 2018-05, which resulted in recognizing an additional tax benefit of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases, and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance to provide additional clarification on specific topics (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the statement of operations. The Company plans to adopt the standard on January 1, 2019, utilizing the transition option provided by Accounting Standards Update 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which the FASB issued in July 2018 and allows the Company to apply the guidance in ASU 2016-02 as of the adoption date, while applying the legacy guidance in ASC 840, Leases, including its disclosure requirements, in the comparative periods. As a lessee, certain of the Company’s leases under existing guidance are classified as operating leases that are not recorded on the balance sheet but are recorded in the statement of operations as expense is incurred. Upon adoption of the standard, the Company will be required to record substantially all leases on the balance sheet as a ROU asset and a lease liability. The Company expects to utilize the package of practical expedients permitted by the transition guidance in ASU 2016-02, which allows the Company to carry forward its identification of contracts that are or contain leases, its historical lease classification and its initial direct costs for existing leases. The Company currently expects to recognize lease liabilities for its operating leases totaling between $110.0 million and $125.0 million upon adoption, of which between $22.0 million and $37.0 million will be classified as a current liability. The initial ROU assets recognized will be equal to the initial operating lease liabilities, adjusted for the balance on adoption date of prepaid and accrued rent, lease incentives, unamortized initial direct costs and unamortized assets and liabilities related to favorable and unfavorable lease terms. The Company currently expects to recognize ROU assets totaling between $105.0 million and $120.0 million upon adoption. The Company does not expect adoption of the standard to have a material impact on the Company’s historical capital leases, which will be presented as finance leases under ASU 2016-02. See Note 13 for further information on the Company’s leases.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 amends the impairment model by requiring entities to use a forward-looking approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted beginning January 1, 2019. Modified retrospective application is required, with certain exceptions. The Company expects to adopt the standard on January 1, 2020 and continues to evaluate the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment by removing Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires computation of the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill. The amount of a goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective for the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test and any interim tests during the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Prospective application is required. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance to provide additional clarification on specific topics (“ASU 2018-13”). ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements by removing, modifying and adding certain disclosure requirements in ASC 820. ASU 2018-13 is effective for the Company’s annual and interim periods beginning on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. Certain disclosures in ASU 2018-13 are required to be applied prospectively, while others require retrospective application. The Company is evaluating the impact of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

For all acquisitions, the Company allocates the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition based on the estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the fair value of the purchase consideration over the fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Management makes significant estimates and assumptions when determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These estimates include, but are not limited to, discount rates, projected future net sales, projected future expected cash flows and useful lives.

The Company accounts for all acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting under ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”), whereby the results of operations of the acquired company are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date.

On November 1, 2018, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of its Coleman Floor business (“Coleman Floor”) for a preliminary sale price of $7.8 million, subject to certain customary post-closing adjustments. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the net sales of Coleman Floor represented approximately 1% of the Company’s net sales. The sale does not represent a strategic shift under ASC 205, Presentation of Financial Statements, and as such, is not reported as a discontinued operation in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company recognized a loss on the sale of $0.3 million, which is included in other income, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

On March 1, 2018, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of W.E. Shone Co. (“Shone Lumber”), a supplier of building materials in the state of Delaware, for a preliminary purchase price of $22.4 million. This acquisition enhances the Company’s value-added offerings and footprint in the Mid-Atlantic region. The preliminary purchase price includes a holdback which, after certain post-closing adjustments, requires the Company to pay $1.4 million to the sellers one year from the closing date. The holdback amount may be further reduced under certain circumstances. The Company funded the transaction through available cash and borrowings on the Company’s revolving line of credit.

The purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of goodwill of $2.5 million, a customer relationship intangible asset of $7.0 million, accounts receivable of $6.4 million, inventory of $8.8 million, property and equipment of $2.9 million and total current liabilities of $5.3 million, as well as other operating assets. The customer relationship intangible asset has a useful life of 9 years. Goodwill represents the future economic benefits expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify

for separate recognition, including assembled workforce and non-contractual relationships, as well as expected future synergies. All of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, Shone Lumber generated net sales of approximately $70.7 million. The Company incurred transaction costs of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

Net sales and estimated pre-tax earnings for Shone Lumber included in the consolidated statements of operations from the March 1, 2018 acquisition date to December 31, 2018 were $60.9 million and $3.2 million, respectively. The impact of the acquisition was not considered significant for the reporting of pro forma financial information.

On April 3, 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Texas Plywood & Lumber Company, Inc. (“TexPly”), a supplier of production millwork and doors in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, for a purchase price of $31.7 million. This acquisition enhances the Company’s value-added offerings and footprint in the Dallas-Fort Worth market. The Company funded the transaction through borrowings on the Company’s revolving line of credit.

The purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of goodwill of $3.6 million, a customer relationship intangible asset of $13.6 million, accounts receivable of $5.2 million, inventory of $3.9 million and real property of $5.4 million, as well as other operating assets and liabilities. The customer relationship intangible asset has a useful life of 13 years. Goodwill represents the future economic benefits expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition, including assembled workforce and non-contractual relationships, as well as expected future synergies. All of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

On March 27, 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Code Plus Components, LLC (“Code Plus”), a manufacturer of structural components located in Martinsburg, West Virginia, for a purchase price of $7.1 million. This acquisition allowed the Company to add truss manufacturing capability to its value-added offerings in the Washington, DC metro area. The acquisition includes an earnout provision that requires the Company to pay the sellers an additional $0.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, due to the acquired operations achieving certain performance targets from the acquisition date through December 31, 2018. The Company funded the transaction through borrowings on the Company’s revolving line of credit.

The purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of goodwill of $3.4 million, a customer relationship intangible asset of $2.3 million and a non-compete agreement intangible asset of $0.5 million, as well as other operating assets and liabilities. The customer relationship intangible asset and non-compete agreement intangible asset have useful lives of 12 years and 5 years, respectively. Goodwill represents the future economic benefits expected to arise from other intangible assets acquired that do not qualify for separate recognition, including assembled workforce and non-contractual relationships, as well as expected future synergies. All of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Net sales and estimated pre-tax earnings for Code Plus and TexPly, in aggregate, included in the consolidated statements of operations were $54.3 million and $3.2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017. The impact of the Code Plus and TexPly acquisitions was not considered significant for the reporting of pro forma financial information.

Accounts receivable consist of the following at December 31, 2018 and 2017:

The following table shows the changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts:

5.    Inventories

Inventories consist principally of materials purchased for resale, including lumber, sheet goods, millwork, doors and windows, as well as certain manufactured products and are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost being measured using a weighted average cost approach, which approximates the first-in, first-out approach. A provision for excess and obsolete inventory of $2.3 million and $1.5 million is recorded as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Property and equipment consists of the following at December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Total depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $50.4 million, $53.2 million and $48.0 million, respectively, including amortization expense related to capital leases. These amounts include depreciation expense of $10.7 million, $10.2 million and $9.5 million included in cost of goods sold in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During 2013, BMHC selected a new third-party software vendor for its planned Enterprise Resource Planning (“New ERP”) system and began incurring costs related to design, development and implementation of the New ERP. BMHC also began paying an annual licensing fee. During March 2016, the Company decided to integrate all operations under the Enterprise Resource Planning system utilized by Legacy SBS (the “Legacy SBS ERP system”) and to discontinue the use of the New ERP. In connection with this decision, the Company recorded asset impairment charges of approximately $11.9 million in its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 related to capitalized software development costs for New ERP functionality that the

Company had intended to implement in future periods. These costs had previously been recorded as construction-in-progress within property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company determined that it had ceased receiving economic benefit from certain non-cancellable license and service contracts related to the New ERP. In accordance with ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, as of the cease use date, the Company recognized approximately $2.8 million of expense within Merger and integration costs in its consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017, consisting of $2.1 million for contractual payments due subsequent to the cease use date, all of which have been paid as of December 31, 2017, and the acceleration of expense recognition of unamortized prepaid costs of $0.7 million.

7.    Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net