Item 1. Business
As used herein, “Match Group,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us,” and similar terms refer to Match Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
Consumers’ dating preferences vary significantly, influenced in part by demographics, geography, cultural norms, religion, and sensibility.intent (for example, casual dating or more serious relationships). As a result, the market for dating products is fragmented, and no single product has been able to effectively serve the dating category as a whole.
Prior to the proliferation of mobile devices and computers, human connections traditionally were limited by social circles, geography, and time. People met through work colleagues, friends and family, in school, at church, or in bars and restaurants. Today, the adoption of mobile technology and the internet has significantly expanded the ways in which people can build relationships, create new interactions, and develop romantic connections. Additionally, the ongoing adoption of technology into more aspects of daily life continues to further erode biases and stigmas across the world that previously prevented individuals from using technology to help find and develop those connections.
We believe that dating products serve as a natural extension of the traditional means of meeting people and provide a number of benefits for their users, including:
•Convenience: The nature of the internet and the proliferation of mobile devices allow users to connect with new people at any time, regardless of where they are.
Depending on a person’s circumstances at any given time, dating products can act as a supplement to, or substitute for, traditional means of meeting people. When selecting a dating product, we believe that users consider the following attributes:
•Brand recognition: Brand is very important. Users generally associate strong dating brands with a higher likelihood of success and a higher level of safety and security. Generally, successful dating brands depend on large,
active communities of users, strong algorithmic filtering technology, and awareness of successful usage among similar users.
•Successful experiences: Demonstrated success of other users attracts new users through word-of-mouth recommendations. Successful experiences also drive repeat usage.
•Community identification: Users typically look for dating products that offer a community or communities with which the user can associate. By selecting a dating product that is focused on a particular demographic, religion, geography, or intent, (for example, casual dating or more serious relationships), users can increase the likelihood that they will make a connection with someone with whom they identify.
•Product features and user experience: Users tend to gravitate towards dating products that offer features and user experiences that resonate with them, such as question-based matching algorithms, location-based features, offline events, or search capabilities. User experience is also driven by the type of user interface (for example, swipingusing a Swipe® gesture versus scrolling), a particular mix of free and paid features, ease of use, privacy, and security. Users expect every interaction with a dating product to be seamless and intuitive.
Our portfolio
Dating is a highly personal endeavor and consumers have a wide variety of preferences that determine what type of dating product they choose. As a result, our strategy focuses on a portfolio approach of various brands in order to reach a broad range of users. Our brands are collectively available in over 40 languages all over the world. The following is a list of our key brands:
Tinder. Tinder was launched in 2012 and has since risen to scale and popularity faster than any other product in the online dating category, with limited marketing spend, growing to over 4.35.9 million Subscribers today.average subscribers as of the fourth quarter of 2019. Tinder’s distinctive “right swipe”Swipe feature has led to significant adoption, particularly among the millennial generation,and younger generations, which was previously underserved by the online dating category. Tinder employs a freemium model, through which users are allowed to enjoy many of the core features of Tinder for free, including limited use of the “swipe right”Swipe Right® feature with unlimited communication with other users. However, to enjoy premium features, such as unlimited use of the “swipe right”Swipe Right feature, a Tinder user must subscribe to either Tinder Plus®, launched in early 2015, or Tinder Gold,Gold™, which was launched in late summer 2017. Tinder users and Subscriberssubscribers may also pay for certain premium features, such as Super LikesLikes™ and Boosts, on a pay-per-use basis.
Match. Match was launched in 1995 and helped create the online dating category. Among its distinguishing features are the ability to search profiles, receive algorithmic matches, and attend live events, promoted by Match, with other Subscribers. Additionally, new features, such as Missed Connections, which uses location-based technologyMatch offers its customers a higher level of service than most other brands, including access to enable users to connect with other users with whom they have crossed paths in the past, engage users into more meaningful connections.date coaching services. Match is a brand that focuses on users with a higher level of intent to enter into a relationship and its product and marketing are designed to reinforce that approach. Match relies heavily on word-of-mouth traffic, repeat usage, and paid marketing.
PlentyOfFish. PlentyOfFish was launched in 2003 and acquired in October 2015. Similar to Match, among its distinguishing features is the ability to both search profiles and receive algorithmic matches. Similar to Tinder, PlentyOfFish has grown to popularity over the years with very limited marketing spend and also relies on a freemium model. PlentyOfFish has broad appeal in the central United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and a number of other international markets.
Meetic. Meetic, a leading European online dating brand based in France, was launched in 2001. Similar to Match, among its distinguishing features are the ability to search profiles, receive algorithmic matches, and attend live events, promoted by Meetic, with other Subscribers and non-Subscribers from time to time. Also, similar to Match, Meetic is a brand that focuses on users with a higher level of intent to enter into a relationship and its product and marketing are designed to reinforce that approach. Meetic relies heavily on word-of-mouth traffic, repeat usage, and paid marketing.
OkCupid. OkCupid was launched in 2004 and has attracted users through a mathematical and Q&A approach to the online dating category. Similar to Tinder, and PlentyOfFish, OkCupid has grown in popularity over the years without significant marketing spend and also relies on a freemium model. OkCupid has a loyal, highly educated user base predominately located in major cities in the United States and the United Kingdom.Kingdom, with an increasing presence in other global markets such as India.
OurTime. OurTime is the largest brand within our affinity-oriented brands. OurTime is the largest community of singles over age 50 of any dating product.
Pairs. Pairs was launched in 2012 and acquired in May 2015. Pairs is a leading provider of dating products in Japan, with a strong presence in Taiwan and a growing presence in other select Asian countries. Pairs is a dating app that was specifically designed to address social barriers generally associated with the use of dating products in Asian countries, particularly Japan.
Hinge. Hinge was launched in 2012 and followinghas grown to be a popular app for the relationship-minded, particularly among the millennial and younger generations, in the United States and the United Kingdom. Following a series of primary investments, Match Group took a controlling stake in Hinge in June 2018 and purchased all of the remaining outstanding equity in December 2018. Hinge is a mobile-only experience and employs a freemium model. Hinge focuses on users with a higher level of intent to enter into a relationship and its product is designed to reinforce that approach.
Pairs. Pairs was launched in 2012 and is a leading provider of dating products in Japan, with a presence in Taiwan and South Korea. Pairs is a dating app that was specifically designed to address social barriers generally associated with the use of dating products in Eastern Asian countries, particularly Japan.
PlentyOfFish. PlentyOfFish was launched in 2003. Similar to Match, among its distinguishing features is the ability to both search profiles and receive algorithmic matches. Similar to Tinder, PlentyOfFish has grown in popularity over the years and relies on a freemium model. PlentyOfFish has broad appeal in the central United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and a number of other international markets.
OurTime. OurTime is the largest community of singles over age 50 of any dating product. We offer this product in the United States and a number of European markets.
All our products enable users to establish a profile and review other users’ profiles without charge. Each product also offers additional features, some of which are free, and some of which require payment depending on the particular product. In general, access to premium features requires a subscription, which is typically offered in packages (primarily ranging from one month to six months), depending on the product and circumstance. Prices differ meaningfully within a given brand by the duration of a subscription purchased, the bundle of paid features that a user chooses to access, and whether or not a Subscriber is taking advantage of any special offers. In addition to subscriptions, many of our products offer the user certain features, such as the ability to promote themselves for a given period of time, or to review certain profiles without any signaling to the other users, and these features are offered on a pay-per-use, or à la carte, basis. The precise mix of paid and premium features is established over time on a brand-by-brand basis and is constantly subject to iteration and evolution.
The brands in our portfolio both compete and collaborate with each other. We attempt to empower individual businessbrand leaders with the authority and incentives to grow each of our brands.their respective brand. Our brands compete with each other and with third-party dating businesses on brand characteristics, product features, and business model. We also attempt to centrally facilitate excellence and efficiency across the entire portfolio by:
•centralizing operational functions across certain brands where we have strength in personnel and sufficient commonality of business interest (for example, ad sales, online marketing, and technology centralized across some, but not all, brands);
•developing talent across the portfolio to allow for expertise development and career advancement while giving us the ability to deploy the best talent in the most critical positions across the company at any given time;
•sharing analytics and similar data to leverage product and marketing successes across our businesses rapidly for competitive advantage; and
•centralizing certain administrative functions, like legal, trust and safety, privacy, human resources, accounting, and finance, across the entire portfolio to enable each brand to focus more on growth.
Revenue
Our direct revenue is primarily derived directly from users in the form of recurring subscriptions, which typically provide unlimited access to a bundle of features for a specific period of time, and the balance from à la carte features, where users pay a non-recurring fee for a specific actionbenefit or event.feature. Each of our brands offers a combination of free and paid features targeted to its unique community. In addition to direct revenue from our users, we generate indirect revenue from online advertising, which makes up a much smaller percentage of our overall revenue as compared to direct revenue.
Sales and marketing
Certain of our brands attract the majority of their users through word-of-mouth and other free channels. Other brands rely on paid user acquisition for a significant percentage of their users. Our online marketing activities generally consist of purchasing social media advertising, banner, and other display advertising, search engine marketing, email campaigns, video advertising, business development or partnership deals, creating content, and hiring influencers to promote our products. Our offline marketing activities generally consist of television advertising and related public relations efforts, as well as events.
Technology
Consistent with our general operating philosophy, each of our brands tends to develop its own technology systems to support its product, leveraging both open-source and vendor supported software technology. Each of our various brands has dedicated engineering teams responsible for software development and creation of new features to support our products across the full range of devices, from native mobile applications to desktop and mobile-web. Our engineering teams use an agile development process, allowing us to deploy frequent iterative releases forof product features.
WeBrands such as Tinder, Pairs, and Hinge utilize hosted web services, primarily Amazon Web Services, to support their infrastructure. Other brands host the majority of our brands inthrough leased data centers located within the general geography served by the brand. Other brands, such as Tinder, utilize hosted web services, primarily Amazon Web Services, to support their infrastructure.
Competition
The dating industry is competitive and has no single, dominant brand globally. We compete with a number of other companies that provide similar dating and matchmaking products.
In addition to other online dating brands, we compete with social media platforms and offline dating services, such as in-person matchmakers. Arguably, our biggest competition comes from the traditional ways that people meet each other, and the choices some people make to not utilize dating products or services.
We believe that our ability to compete successfully will depend primarily upon the following factors:
•our ability to continue to increase consumer acceptance and adoption of online dating products, particularly in emerging markets and other parts of the world where the stigma is only beginning to erode;
•continued growth in internet access and smart phone adoption in certain regions of the world, particularly emerging markets;
•the continued strength of our brands;
•the breadth and depth of our active communities of users relative to those of our competitors;
•our ability to evolve our products and develop new products in response to our competitors’ offerings, user requirements, social trends, the ever-evolving technological landscape, and the ever-changing regulatory landscape, in particular, as it relates to the regulation of onlineconsumer digital media platforms;
•our ability to efficiently acquire new users for our products;
•our ability to continue to optimize our monetization strategies; and
•the design and functionality of our products.
A large portion of online dating customers use multiple dating products over a given period of time, either concurrently or sequentially, making our broad portfolio of brands a competitive advantage.
Intellectual property
We regard our intellectual property rights, including trademarks, domain names and other intellectual property, as critical to our success.
For example, we rely heavily upon the use of trademarks (primarily Tinder, Match, PlentyOfFish, OkCupid, Meetic, OurTime, Pairs, and Hinge, and associated domain names, taglines and logos) to market our dating products and applications and build and maintain brand loyalty and recognition. We have an ongoing trademark and service
mark registration program, pursuant to which we register our brand names, and product names, taglines and logos and renew existing trademark and service mark registrations in the United States and other jurisdictions to the extent we determine it to be necessary or otherwise appropriate and cost-effective. In addition, we have a trademark and service mark monitoring policy pursuant to which we monitor applications filed by third parties to register trademarks and service marks that may be confusingly similar to ours, as well as potential unauthorized use of our material trademarks and service marks. Our enforcement of this policy affords us valuable protection under current laws, rules and regulations. We also reserve and file registrations (to the extent available) and renew existing registrations for domain names that we believe are material to our business.
We also rely upon a combination of in-licensed third-party and proprietary trade secrets, including proprietary algorithms, and upon patented and patent-pending technologies, processes, and features relating to our matching process systems or related features, products, and services with expiration dates from 2023 to 2036. We have an ongoing invention recognition program pursuant to which we apply for patents to the extent we determine it to be core to our product or businesses or otherwise appropriate and cost-effective.
We rely on a combination of internal and external controls, including applicable laws, rules and regulations, and contractual restrictions with employees, contractors, customers, suppliers, affiliates and others, to establish, protect and otherwise control access to our various intellectual property rights.
Government regulation
We are subject to foreign and domestic laws and regulations that affect companies conducting business on the internet generally, including laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for their operations and the activities of their users. As a result, we could be subject to actions based on negligence, various torts, and trademark and copyright infringement, among other actions. See “Risk factors—Risks relating to our business—Inappropriate actions by certain of our users could be attributed to us and damage our brands’ reputations, which in turn could adversely affect our business” and “—Risks relating to our business—We may fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or may be accused of infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties.”
Because we receive, store, and use a substantial amount of information received from or generated by our users, we are also impacted by laws and regulations governing privacy,privacy; the storage, sharing, use, processing, disclosure, and protection of personal datadata; and data breaches, primarily in the case of our operations in the United States and the European Union and our handling of personal data of users located in the United States and European Union, respectively. As a result, we could be subject to various private and governmental claims and actions. See “Risk factors—Risks relating to our business—Unauthorized accessThe varying and rapidly-evolving regulatory framework on privacy and data protection across jurisdictions could result in claims, changes to our business practices, monetary penalties, increased cost of personal data could give rise to liabilities as a result of governmental regulation, conflicting legal requirementsoperations, or differing views of personal privacy rights and compliance with laws designed to prevent unauthorized access of personal data could be costly.declines in user growth or engagement, or otherwise harm our business.”
As the provider of dating products with a subscription-based element, we are also subject to laws and regulations in certain U.S. states and other countries that apply to our automatically-renewing subscription payment models. Finally, certain U.S. states and certain countries in Asia have laws that specifically govern dating services.
Employees
As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had approximately 1,4001,700 full-time employees and approximately 100 part-time employees worldwide.
Additional Information
Corporate information. We were incorporated in the State of Delaware on February 12, 2009 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of IAC/InterActiveCorp (“IAC”).
Company website and public filings. Investors and others should note that we announce material financial and operational information to our investors using our investor relations website at http:https://ir.mtch.com, Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, press releases, and public conference calls. We use these channels as well as social media to communicate with our users and the public about our company, our services, and other issues. It is possible that the information we post on social media could be deemed to be material information.
Accordingly, investors, the media, and others interested in our company should monitor the social media channels listed on our investor relations website in addition to following our SEC filings, press releases, and public conference calls. Neither the information on our website, nor the information on the website of any Match Group business, is incorporated by reference into this report, or into any other filings with, or into any other information furnished or submitted to, the SEC.
The Company makes available, free of charge through its website, its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K (including related amendments) as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed with (or furnished to) the SEC.
Code of ethics. The Company’s code of ethics applies to all employees (including Match Group’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) and directors and is posted on the Company’s website at http:https://ir.mtch.com under the heading of “Corporate Governance.” This code of ethics complies with Item 406 of SEC Regulation S-K and the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC. Any changes to the code of ethics that affect the provisions required by Item 406 of Regulation S-K, and any waivers of such provisions of the code of ethics for Match Group’s executive officers, senior financial officers or directors, will also be disclosed on Match Group’s website.
Relationshipwith IAC
Relationship prior to Separation
Equity ownership and vote. Match Group has outstanding shares of common stock, with one vote per share, and shares of Class B common stock, with ten votes per share and which are convertible into common stock on a share for share basis. As of February 1, 2019,January 31, 2020, IAC owned 209,919,402 shares of Class B common stock representing 100% of our outstanding Class B common stock and 15,813,27718,160,609 shares of common stock. These holdings collectively represent approximately 81.1%80.7% of our outstanding shares of capital stock and approximately 97.6%97.5% of the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock.
Intercompany agreements. In connection with the initial public offering of our common stock in November 2015, we entered into certain agreements relating to our relationship with IAC after the offering. These agreements include, among others, the six agreements described below.
Master transaction agreement. The master transaction agreement sets forth the agreements between us and IAC regarding the principal transactions necessary to separate our business from IAC, as well as governs certain aspects of our relationship with IAC.
Investor rights agreement. Under the investor rights agreement, we are obligated to provide IAC with certain registration and other rights relating to the shares of our common stock held by it and anti-dilution rights.
Tax sharing agreement. The tax sharing agreement governs our and IAC’s rights, responsibilities, and obligations with respect to tax liabilities and benefits, entitlements to refunds, the preparation of tax returns, tax contests and other tax matters regarding U.S. federal, state, local and foreign income taxes.
Services agreement. The services agreement currently governs services that IAC has agreed to provide through November 24, 2019,2020, with automatic renewal for successive one-year terms, subject to IAC’s continued ownership of a majority of the combined voting power of our voting stock and any subsequent extension or truncation agreed to by us and IAC.
Employee matters agreement. The employee matters agreement, as amended, covers a wide range of compensation and benefit issues related to the allocation of liabilities associated with: (i) employment or termination of employment, (ii) employee benefit plans and (iii) equity awards. In the event IAC no longer retains shares representing at least 80% of the aggregate voting power of shares entitled to vote in the election of our board of directors, we will no longer participate in IAC’s employee benefit plans, but will establish our own employee benefit plans that will be substantially similar to the plans sponsored by IAC.
Subordinated loan credit facility. The subordinated loan facility with IAC (the “IAC Subordinated Loan Facility”) allowsallowed the Company to make one or more requests to IAC to borrow funds. If IAC agrees to fulfill any such borrowing request, such indebtedness will be incurred in accordance with the terms of the IAC Subordinated Loan Facility. At December 31, 2018,2019, the Company had no indebtedness outstanding under the IAC Subordinated Loan Facility. The IAC Subordinated Loan Facility was terminated February 26, 2020.
For additional information regarding these agreements, see “Note 15—16—Related Party Transactions” to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8—Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Separation
On December 19, 2019, Match Group and IAC entered into a Transaction Agreement (the “Transaction Agreement”) pursuant to which, following the satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including IAC and Match Group stockholder approval, the businesses of Match Group will be separated from the remaining businesses of IAC through a series of transactions (the “Transactions”) that will result in two, separate public companies—(1) IAC, which will be re-named “Match Group, Inc.” (referred to herein as “New Match”) and which will own the businesses of Match Group and certain IAC financing subsidiaries, and (2) IAC Holdings, Inc. (which we refer to as “New IAC”), which will be re-named “IAC/InterActiveCorp” and which will own IAC’s other businesses—and the pre-transaction stockholders of Match Group (other than IAC) and of IAC owning shares in New Match (the “Separation”). Completion of the Separation is expected to occur in mid-second quarter of 2020.
Under the terms of the Transaction Agreement, if the closing of the Transactions occurs, Match Group will merge with and into an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of IAC (“New Match Merger Sub”), with New Match Merger Sub surviving the merger as an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of New Match. Match Group stockholders (excluding shares owned by IAC, Match Group, or any of their respective wholly owned subsidiaries) will receive, through the merger, in exchange for each outstanding share of Match Group common stock that they hold, one share of New Match common stock and, at the holder’s election, either (i) $3.00 in cash or (ii) a fraction of a share of New Match common stock with a value of $3.00 (calculated pursuant to the Transaction Agreement) (an “additional stock election”). In the event the holder fails to make a valid election, the holder will be treated as if such holder made an additional stock election. As a result of the merger and other transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, Match Group stockholders (other than IAC) will become stockholders of New Match, which will hold the businesses of Match Group and certain IAC financing subsidiaries and be separate from the other business of IAC.
Following the Separation, Match Group will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Match and New Match will continue to own certain IAC financing subsidiaries that are the issuers of approximately $1.7 billion aggregate principal amount of currently outstanding exchangeable notes. If the Separation is not completed, Match Group will remain a majority-owned subsidiary of IAC, and IAC may pursue other options with respect to its ownership interest in Match Group.
Under the terms of the Transaction Agreement, Match Group has agreed to make a loan (the ‘‘Intercompany Loan’’) to IAC, in an aggregate principal amount equal to the product of $3.00 and the number of shares of Match Group capital stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Separation. IAC will contribute the proceeds of the loan, less an amount necessary to fund all valid cash elections, to New IAC as part of the closing of the Transactions. Following the Separation, the Intercompany Loan will be the obligation of New Match payable to Match Group and may be eliminated during certain intercompany transactions between New Match and Match Group. In the event that the Separation is not consummated, we do not intend to make the Intercompany Loan.
Relationship after the Separation
Transition services agreement. At or prior to the closing of the Separation, New Match and New IAC will enter into a transition services agreement, pursuant to which New IAC will provide certain of the services to New Match following the closing that IAC has historically provided to Match Group. New Match will also provide certain services to New IAC following the closing that Match employees are currently providing to IAC. The costs charged to the recipient party of services will generally be determined based on the actual costs incurred by the service provider in providing such services.
Employee matters agreement. At or prior to the closing of the Separation, New Match and New IAC will enter into an employee matters agreement, which will cover compensation and benefits matters related to the Separation. Following the Separation, New Match employees will continue to participate in New IAC’s U.S. health and welfare plans, 401(k) plan and flexible benefits plan until December 31, 2020 (or such earlier date as requested by New Match upon 120 days’ notice), following which time, New Match will have established its own employee benefit plans. New Match will reimburse New IAC for the costs of such participation.
Tax matters agreement. At or prior to the closing of the Separation, IAC and New IAC will enter into a tax matters agreement pursuant to which, among other things, each of IAC and New IAC will be responsible for certain tax liabilities and obligations following the Separation. Under the tax matters agreement, New IAC generally will be responsible for, and will indemnify New Match against, any liabilities incurred as a result of the failure of the Separation to qualify for the intended tax-free treatment unless, subject to certain exceptions, the failure to so qualify is attributable to Match Group’s (or, after the merger, New Match’s) actions or failure to act, Match Group’s breach of certain representations or covenants or certain acquisitions of equity securities of New Match, in each case, described in the tax matters agreement, (a “Match fault-based action”). If the failure to so qualify is attributable to a Match fault-based action, New Match will be responsible for liabilities incurred as a result of such failure and will indemnify New IAC against such liabilities so incurred by New IAC or its affiliates.
Contribution Agreement
On December 19, 2019, in connection with the execution of the Transaction Agreement, TMC Realty, L.L.C. and 8831-8833 Sunset, LLC (each an affiliate of IAC, and together the “Contributors”) and Match Group entered into a Contribution Agreement providing for the contribution of 8800 West Sunset Boulevard and 8833 West Sunset Boulevard by the Contributors to two wholly-owned subsidiaries of Match Group (the “Contribution”). On January 31, 2020, the Contributors completed the Contribution for aggregate consideration of 1,378,371 shares of Match Group common stock.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This annual report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The use of words such as “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans” and “believes,” among others, generally identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements relating to: Match Group’s future financial performance, Match Group’s business prospects and strategy, anticipated trends and prospects in the industries in which Match Group’s businesses operate and other similar matters. These forward-looking statements are based on Match Group management’s current expectations and assumptions about future events as of the date of this annual report, which are inherently subject to uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict.
Actual results could differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including, among others,others: the risk factors set forth below. Other unknown or unpredictable factors that could also adversely affect Match Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations may arise from time to time. In light of these risks and uncertainties, thethese forward-looking statements discussed in this annual report may not prove to be accurate. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which only reflect the views of Match Group’sGroup management as of the date of this annual report. Match Group does not undertake to update these forward-looking statements.
Risks relating to our business
The limited operating history of our newer dating brands and products makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects.
We seek to tailor each of our dating brands and products to meet the preferences of specific communities of users. Building a given brand or product is generally an iterative process that occurs over a meaningful period of time and involves considerable resources and expenditures. Although certain of our newer brands and products have experienced significant growth over relatively short periods of time, the historical growth rates of these brands and products may not be an indication of future growth rates for such products or our newer brands and products generally. We have encountered, and may continue to encounter, risks and difficulties as we build our newer brands and products. The failure to successfully address these risks and difficulties could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The dating industry is competitive, with low switching costs and a consistent stream of new products and entrants, and innovation by our competitors may disrupt our business.
The dating industry is competitive, with a consistent stream of new products and entrants. Some of our competitors may enjoy better competitive positions in certain geographical regions, user demographics or other key areas that we currently serve or may serve in the future. These advantages could enable these competitors to offer products that are more appealing to users and potential users than our products or to respond more quickly and/or cost-effectively than us to new or changing opportunities.
In addition, within the dating industry generally, costs for consumers to switch between products are low, and consumers have a propensity to try new approaches to connecting with people and to use multiple dating products at the same time. As a result, new products, entrants and business models are likely to continue to emerge. It is possible that a new product could gain rapid scale at the expense of existing brands through harnessing a new technology or a new or existing distribution channel, creating a new or different approach to connecting people or some other means.
Potential competitors include larger companies that could devote greater resources to the promotion or marketing of their products and services, take advantage of acquisition or other opportunities more readily or develop and expand their products and services more quickly than we do. Potential competitors also include established social media companies that may develop products, features, or services that may compete with ours. For example, Facebook has introduced a dating feature on its platform, which it is testinghas rolled out in certainNorth America and other markets and recently announced thathas stated it plans to roll this feature out globally in the near future.globally. These social media competitors could use strong or dominant positions in one or more markets, and ready access to existing large pools of potential users and personal information regarding those users, to gain competitive advantages over us, including by offering different product features or services that users may prefer or offering their products and services to
users at no charge, which may enable them to acquire and engage users at the expense of our user growth or engagement.
If we are not able to compete effectively against our current or future competitors and products that may emerge, the size and level of engagement of our user base may decrease, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The limited operating history of our newer dating brands and products makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects.
We seek to tailor each of our dating brands and products to meet the preferences of specific communities of users. Building a given brand or product is generally an iterative process that occurs over a meaningful period of time and involves considerable resources and expenditures. Although certain of our newer brands and products
have experienced significant growth over relatively short periods of time, the historical growth rates of these brands and products may not be an indication of future growth rates for such products or our newer brands and products generally. We have encountered, and may continue to encounter, risks and difficulties as we build our newer brands and products. The failure to successfully address these risks and difficulties could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Each of our dating products monetizes users at different rates. If a meaningful migration of our user base from our higher monetizing dating products to our lower monetizing dating products were to occur, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
WeOur portfolio companies own, operate, and manage a large and diverse portfoliovariety of dating products. Each dating product has its own mix of free and paid features designed to optimize the user experience and revenue generation from that product’s community of users. In general, the mix of features for the various dating products within our more established brands leads to higher monetization rates per user than the mix of features for the various dating products within our newer brands. Over time, users of our newer brands with lower monetization rates per user comprise an increasingly larger percentage of our user base. If this trend leads to a significant portion of users of our brands with higher monetization rates migrating to our less profitable brands, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. See “Item 7—Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—Management overview—Trends affecting our business.”
Our growth and profitability rely, in part, on our ability to attract and retain users through cost-effective marketing efforts. Any failure in these efforts could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Attracting and retaining users for certain of our dating products involve considerable expenditures for online and offline marketing. Historically, we have had to increase our marketing expenditures over time in order to attract and retain users and sustain our growth.
Evolving consumer behavior can affect the availability of profitable marketing opportunities. For example, as traditional television viewership declines and as consumers spend more time on mobile devices rather than desktop computers, the reach of many of our traditional advertising channels is contracting. Similarly, as consumers communicate less via email and more via text messaging and other virtual means, the reach of email campaigns designed to attract new and repeat users (and retain current users) for our dating products is adversely impacted. To continue to reach potential users and grow our businesses, we must identify and devote more of our overall marketing expenditures to newer advertising channels, such as mobile and online video platforms, as well as targeted campaigns in which we communicate directly with potential, former and current users via new virtual means. Generally, the opportunities in and sophistication of newer advertising channels are relatively undeveloped and unproven, making it difficult to assess returns on investment associated with such advertising channels, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to appropriately manage and fine-tune our marketing efforts in response to these and other trends in the advertising industry. Any failure to do so could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Communicating with our users via email is critical to our success, and any erosion in our ability to communicate in this fashion that is not sufficiently replaced by other means could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Historically, one of our primary means of communicating with our users and keeping them engaged with our products has been via email communication. Our ability to communicate via email enables us to keep our users updated on activity with respect to their profile, present or suggest new or interesting users from the community, invite users to offline events and present discount and promotional offers, among other things. As consumer habits evolve in the era of web-enabled mobile devices and messaging/social networking apps, usage of email, particularly among our younger users, has declined. In addition, deliverability and other restrictions imposed by third party email providers and/or applicable law could limit or prevent our ability to send emails to our users. A continued and significant erosion in our ability to communicate successfully with our users via email could have an adverse impact on user experience, levels of user engagement and the rate at which non-paying users become Subscribers.subscribers.
While we continually work to find new means of communicating and connecting with our users (for example, through push notifications), there is no assurance that such alternative means of communication will be
as effective as email has been. Any failure to develop or take advantage of new means of communication or limitations on those means of communications imposed by laws, device manufacturers or other sources could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our results of operations.
We operate in various international markets, primarily in various jurisdictions within the European Union and Asia. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, 53% and 2017, 50% and 46% of our total revenues, respectively, were international revenues. We translate international revenues into U.S. dollar-denominated operating results and during periods of a strengthening U.S. dollar, our international revenues will be reduced when translated into U.S. dollars. In addition, as foreign currency exchange rates fluctuate, the translation of our international revenues into U.S. dollar-denominated operating results affects the period-over-period comparability of such results and can result in foreign currency exchange gains and losses.
We have exposure to foreign currency exchange risk related to transactions carried out in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, and investments in foreign subsidiaries with a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar. Our exposure is primarily related to the Euro, and to a lesser extent, the British Pound (“GBP”). The average GBP and Euro exchange rates strengthened against the U.S. Dollar by 4% and 5%, respectively, in 20182019 compared to 2017.2018. See “Item 7A—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Currency Exchange Risk.”
BrexitThe departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit,” has caused, and may continue to cause, disruptions to capitalvolatility in currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and currency markets worldwide,the GBP and the full impact of the Brexit decision remains uncertain. Ongoing negotiations between the United Kingdom and the European Union will determine the terms of their relationship following Brexit. During this period of negotiation and following the completion of Brexit, our operating results may be negatively affected by exchange rate and other market and economic volatility. To the extent that the U.S. dollar strengthens relative to either the Euro, the GBP or both, the translation of our international revenues into U.S. dollars will reduce our U.S. dollar denominated operating results and will affect their period-over-period comparability.
Historically, we have not hedged any foreign currency exposures. The continued growth and expansion of our international operations into new countries increases our exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Significant foreign exchange rate fluctuations, in the case of one currency or collectively with other currencies, could adversely affect our future results of operations.
Distribution and marketing of, and access to, our dating products depends, in significant part, on a variety of third-party publishers, platforms and mobile app stores. If these third parties limit, prohibit or otherwise interfere with or change the terms of the distribution, use or marketing of our dating products in any material way, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We market and distribute our dating products (including related mobile applications) through a variety of third-party publishers and distribution channels, including Facebook, which recently announcedhas rolled out its own dating product. Our ability to market our brands on any given property or channel is subject to the policies of the relevant third party. Certain publishers and channels have, from time to time, limited or prohibited advertisements for dating products for a variety of reasons, including as a result of poor behavior by other industry participants. There is no assurance that we will not be limited or prohibited from using certain current or prospective marketing channels in the future. If this were to happen in the case of a significant marketing channel and/or for a significant period of time, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Additionally, our mobile applications are increasinglyalmost exclusively accessed through the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store. Both Apple and Google have broad discretion to change their respective terms and conditions applicable to the distribution of our applications, including the amount of, and requirement to pay, certain fees associated with purchases facilitated by Apple and Google through our applications, and to interpret their respective terms and conditions in ways that may limit, eliminate or otherwise interfere with our ability to distribute our applications through their stores, the features we provide, and the manner in which we market our in-app products.products, and our ability to access information about our users and subscribers that they collect. Apple or Google could also make changes to their operating systems or payment services that could negatively impact our business. There is no assurance that Apple or Google will not limit, eliminate or otherwise interfere with the distribution of our products, the features we provide, and the manner in which we market our in-app products within our applications.applications or through other applications and services, and our ability to access information about our users and subscribers that they collect. To the extent either or both of them do so, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Lastly, in the case of Tinder, Hinge, and certain other of our other products, many users historically registered for (and logged into) the application exclusively through their Facebook profiles. While we have launched an alternate authentication method that allows users to register for (and log into) Tinder, Hinge, and our other products using their mobile phone number, no assurances can be provided that users will no longer register for (and log into) Tinder, Hinge, and our otherthese products through their Facebook profiles. Facebook has broad discretion to change its terms and conditions applicable to the data collected by its platform and its use thereof and to interpret its terms and conditions in ways that could limit, eliminate or otherwise interfere with our ability to use Facebook as an authentication method or to allow Facebook to use such data to gain a competitive advantage. If Facebook did so, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The success of our products will depend, in part, on our ability to access, collect, and use personal data about our users and subscribers.
We depend on mobile app stores, in particular, the Apple App Store and Google Play Store, to market, distribute and monetize our mobile applications. Our users and subscribers engage with these platforms directly and may be subject to requirements regarding the use of their payment systems for various transactions. As a result, these platforms may receive personal data about our users and subscribers that we would otherwise receive if we transacted with our users and subscribers directly. These platforms have restricted our access to personal data about our users and subscribers obtained through their platforms. If these platforms continue to limit or increasingly limit, eliminate, or otherwise interfere with our ability to access, collect, and use personal data about our users and subscribers that they have collected, the ability of our products to identify and communicate with a meaningful portion of our users and subscriber bases may be adversely impacted. If so, our customer relationship management efforts, our ability to identify, target, and reach new segments of our user and subscriber bases and the population generally, the efficiency of our paid marketing efforts, the rates we are able to charge advertisers seeking to reach users and subscribers on our various properties, and our ability to identify and exclude users and subscribers whose access would violate applicable terms and conditions, including registered sex offenders, may be negatively impacted. There is no assurance that the mobile app stores upon which we rely will not limit or increasingly limit, eliminate, or otherwise interfere with our ability to access, collect, and use personal data about our users and subscribers that they have collected. To the extent that they do so, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
As the distribution of our dating products through app stores increases, in order to maintain our profit margins, we may need to offset increasing app store fees by decreasing traditional marketing expenditures, increasing user volume or monetization per user or by engaging in other efforts to increase revenue or decrease costs generally, or our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
As our user base continues to shift to mobile solutions, weWe increasingly rely on the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store to distribute our mobile applications and related in-app products. While our mobile applications are generally free to download from these stores, we offer our users the opportunity to purchase subscriptions and certain à la carte features through these applications. We determine the prices at which these subscriptions and features are sold; however, purchases of these subscriptions and features are required to be processed through the in-app payment systems provided by Apple and, to a lesser degree, Google. Due to these requirements, we pay Apple and Google, as applicable, a meaningful share (generally 30%) of the revenue we receive from these transactions. While we are constantly innovating on and creating our own payment systems and methods, given the increase of the distribution of our dating products through app stores and the strict requirements to use the in-app payments systems tied into Apple’s, and to a lesser degree, Google’s distribution services, we may need to offset these increased app store fees by decreasing traditional marketing expenditures as a percentage of revenue, increasing user volume or monetization per user, or by engaging in other efforts to increase revenue or decrease costs generally, or our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Additionally, to the extent Google changes its terms and conditions or practices to require us to process purchases of subscriptions and features through their in-app payment system, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We depend on our key personnel.
Our future success will depend upon our continued ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly skilled individuals across the globe, with the continued contributions of our senior management being especially critical to our success. Competition for well-qualified employees across Match Group and its various
businesses is intense and our continued ability to compete effectively depends, in part, upon our ability to attract new employees. While we have established programs to attract new employees and provide incentives to retain existing employees, particularly our senior management, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to attract new employees or retain the services of our senior management or any other key employees in the future. Effective succession planning is also important to our future success. If we fail to ensure the effective transfer of senior management knowledge and smooth transitions involving senior management across our various businesses, our ability to execute short and long term strategic, financial and operating goals, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations generally, could be adversely affected.
Our success depends, in part, on the integrity of our systems and infrastructures and on our ability to enhance, expand and adapt these systems and infrastructures in a timely and cost-effective manner.
In order for us to succeed, our systems and infrastructures must perform well on a consistent basis. We have in the past, and we may from time to time we may in the future, experience system interruptions that make some or all of our systems or data unavailable and prevent our products from functioning properly for our users; any such interruption could arise for any number of reasons. Further, our systems and infrastructures are vulnerable to damage from fire, power loss, telecommunications failures, acts of God and similar events. While we have backup systems in place for certain aspects of our operations, not all of our systems and infrastructures are not fully redundant, disaster recovery planning is not sufficient for all eventualities and our property and business interruption insurance coverage may not be adequate to compensate us fully for any losses that we may suffer.
Any interruptions or outages, regardless of the cause, could negatively impact our users’ experiences with our products, tarnish our brands’ reputations and decrease demand for our products, any or all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We also continually work to expand and enhance the efficiency and scalability of our technology and network systems to improve the experience of our users, accommodate substantial increases in the volume of traffic to our various products, ensure acceptable load times for our products and keep up with changes in technology and user preferences. Any failure to do so in a timely and cost-effective manner could adversely affect our users’ experience with our various products and thereby negatively impact the demand for our products, and could increase our costs, either of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to protect our systems and infrastructures from cyberattacks and may be adversely affected by cyberattacks experienced by third parties.
We are regularly under attack by perpetrators of random or targeted malicious technology-related events, such as cyberattacks, computer viruses, worms, bot attacks or other destructive or disruptive software, distributed denial of service attacks and attempts to misappropriate customer information, including credit card information and account login credentials. While we have invested (and continue to invest) heavily in the protection of our systems and infrastructures, in related personnel and training and in employing a strategy of data minimization, where appropriate, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent significant breaches in our systems or other such events from occurring. Some of our systems have experienced past security incidents, and, although they did not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, there can be no assurance of a similar result in the future. Any cyber or similar attack we are unable to protect ourselves against could damage our systems and infrastructures, prevent us from providing our products, erode our reputation and brands, result in the disclosure of confidential or sensitive information of our users and/or be costly to remedy, as well as subject us to investigations by regulatory authorities and/or litigation that could result in liability to third parties.
The impact of cyber security events experienced by third-partiesthird parties with whom we do business (or upon whom we otherwise rely in connection with our day-to-day operations) could have a similar effect on us. Moreover, even cyber or similar attacks that do not directly affect us or third parties with whom we do business may result in widespread access to user account login credentials that such users have used across multiple internet sites, including our sites, or a loss of consumer confidence generally, which could make users less likely to use or continue to use online products generally, including our products. The occurrence of any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends, in part, on the integrity of third-party systems and infrastructures.
We rely on third parties, primarily data center service providers and cloud-based, hosted web service providers, such as Amazon Web Services, as well as third party computer systems, broadband and other communications systems and service providers, in connection with the provision of our products generally, as well as to facilitate and process certain transactions with our users. We have no control over any of these third parties or their operations.
Problems experienced by third-party data center service providers and cloud-based, hosted web service providers, such as Amazon Web Services, upon whom we rely, the telecommunications network providers with whom we or they contract or with the systems through which telecommunications providers allocate capacity among their customers could also adversely affect us. Any changes in service levels at our data centers or hosted web service providers, such as Amazon Web Services, or any interruptions, outages or delays in our systems or those of our third party providers, or deterioration in the performance of these systems, could impair our ability to provide our products or process transactions with our users, which would adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If the security of personal and confidential or sensitive user information that we maintain and store is breached or otherwise accessed by unauthorized persons, it may be costly to mitigate the impact of such an event and our reputation could be harmed.
We receive, process, store, and transmit a significant amount of personal user and other confidential or sensitive information, including credit card information and member-to-member communications, and enable our users to share their personal information with each other. In some cases, we engage third party vendors to store this information. We continuously develop
and maintain systems to protect the security, integrity and confidentiality of this information, but cannot guarantee that inadvertent or unauthorized use or disclosure will not occur or that third parties will not gain unauthorized access to this information despite our efforts. When such events occur, we may not be able to remedy them, we may be required by law to notify regulators and individuals whose personal information was used or disclosed without authorization, and we may have to expend significant capital and other resources to mitigate the impact of such events, including developing and implementing protections to prevent future events of this nature from occurring. When breaches of security (or the security of our vendors and partners) occur, the perception of the effectiveness of our security measures, the security measures of our partners and our reputation may be harmed, we may lose current and potential users and the recognition of our various brands and their competitive positions may be diminished, any or all of which might adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is subject to complex and evolving U.S. and international laws and regulations. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, and could result in claims, changes to our business practices, monetary penalties, increased cost of operations, or declines in user growth or engagement, or otherwise harm our business.
We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States and abroad that involve matters that are important to or may otherwise impact our business, including, among others, broadband internet access, online commerce, advertising, user privacy, data protection, intermediary liability, protection of minors, consumer protection, sex-trafficking, taxation and securities law compliance. The introduction of new products, expansion of our activities in certain jurisdictions, or other actions that we may take may subject us to additional laws, regulations or other government scrutiny. In addition, foreign laws and regulations can impose different obligations or be more restrictive than those in the United States.
These U.S. federal, state, and municipal and foreign laws and regulations, which in some cases can be enforced by private parties in addition to government entities, are constantly evolving and can be subject to significant change. As a result, the application, interpretation, and enforcement of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate, and may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from state to state and country to country and inconsistently with our current policies and practices. These laws and regulations, as well as any associated inquiries or investigations or any other government actions, may be costly to comply with and may delay or impede the development of new products, require that we change or cease certain business practices, result in negative publicity, increase our operating costs, require significant management time and attention, and subject us to remedies that may harm our business, including fines or demands or orders that we modify or cease existing business practices.
Specifically, in the case of tax laws, positions that we have taken or will take are subject to interpretation by the relevant taxing authorities. While we believe that the positions we have taken to date comply with applicable law, there can be no assurances that the relevant taxing authorities will not take a contrary position, and if so, that such positions will not adversely affect us. Any events of this nature could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Proposed or new legislation and regulations could also adversely affect our business. For example, the European Commission and several countries have issuedrecently adopted, or intend to adopt, proposals that would change various aspects of the current tax framework under which we are taxed, including proposals to change or impose new types of non-income taxes, including taxes based on a percentage of revenue. For example, theFrance enacted a Digital Services Tax in 2019 retroactive to January 1, 2019, which is applicable to our business. The United Kingdom has also proposed taxesa similar tax applicable to digital services, which includes business activities on social media platforms, and would likely apply to our business. If enacted, oneOne or more of these or similar proposals could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The promulgation of new laws or regulations, or the new interpretation of existing laws and regulations, in each case that restrict or otherwise unfavorably impact the ability or manner in which we provide our services could require us to change certain aspects of our business and operations to ensure compliance, which could decrease demand for services, reduce revenues, increase costs and subject us to additional liabilities. For example, in February 2019, the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport of the United Kingdom, indicated in public comments that his office intends to inquire as to the measures utilized by online dating platforms, including Tinder, to prevent access by underage users. In addition, in April 2019, the United Kingdom published proposed legislation, which would establish a new regulatory body to establish duties of care for internet companies and to assess compliance with these duties of care. Under the proposed law, failure to comply could result in fines, blocking of services and personal liability for senior management. There have also been calls for legislation to limit or remove the protections afforded technology platforms under the Communications Decency Act in the United States and under the e-Commerce Directive in the European Union. To the extent anysuch new or more stringent measures are required to be implemented, or existing protections are limited or removed, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The adoption of any laws or regulations that adversely affect the popularity or growth in use of the internet or our services, including laws or regulations that undermine open and neutrally administered internet access, could decrease user demand for our service offerings and increase our cost of doing business. For example, in December 2017, the Federal Communications Commission adopted an order reversing net neutrality protections in the United States, including the repeal of specific rules against blocking, throttling or “paid prioritization” of content or services by internet service providers. To the extent internet service providers engage in such blocking, throttling, “paid prioritization” of content or similar actions as a result of this order and the adoption of similar laws or regulations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The varying and rapidly-evolving regulatory framework on privacy and data protection across jurisdictions could result in claims, changes to our business practices, monetary penalties, increased cost of operations, or declines in user growth or engagement, or otherwise harm our business.
There are numerous laws in the countries in which we operate regarding privacy and the storage, sharing, use, processing, disclosure and protection of this kind of information, the scope of which are constantly changing, and in some cases, inconsistent and conflicting and subject to differing interpretations, as new laws of this nature are proposed and adopted. For example, in 2016, the European Commission adopted the General Data Protection Act (“GDPR”), a comprehensive European Union (“EU”) privacy and data protection reform that became effective in May 2018. The act applies to companies established in the European Union or otherwise providing services or monitoring the behavior of people located in the European Union and which provides for significant penalties in case of non-compliance.non-compliance as well as a private right of action for individual claimants. GDPR will continue to be interpreted by EU data protection regulators, which may require that we make changes to our business practices, and could generate additional risks and liabilities. The European Union is also considering an update to the EU’s Privacy and Electronic Communications (so-called “e-Privacy”) Directive, notably to amend rules on the use of cookies. In addition, Brexit could result in the application of new and conflicting data privacy and protection laws and standards to our operations in the United Kingdom and our handling of personal data of users located in the United Kingdom. At the same time, certain developingmany countries in which we do business have already adopted or are also currently considering adopting privacy and data protection laws and regulations. LegislativeMultiple legislative proposals
concerning privacy and the protection of user information are being considered by the U.S. Congress, such as the American Data Dissemination Act, which was introduced in February 2019 by Senator Marco Rubio, as well as variousCongress. Various U.S. state legislatures, including those in New York, Washington, Virginia, and Illinois, intend to consider privacy legislation in 2020. Other U.S. state legislatures have already passed and enacted privacy legislation, most prominent of which is the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, which was signed into law onin June 28, 2018 and comescame into effect on January 1, 2020. A ballot initiative to address privacy concerns has also been filed with the Office of the California Attorney General and, provided it meets appropriate legal requirements, is expected to be presented to California voters on the November 2020 ballot. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission has increased its focus on privacy and data security practices at digital companies, as evidenced by its levying, in July 2019, of a first-of-its kind, $5 billion fine against Facebook for privacy violations.
While we believe that we comply with industry standards and applicable laws and industry codes of conduct relating to privacy and data protection in all material respects, there is no assurance that we will not be subject to claims that we have violated applicable laws or codes of conduct, that we will be able to successfully defend against such claims or that we will not be subject to significant fines and penalties in the event of non-compliance. Additionally, to the extent multiple state-level laws are introduced with inconsistent or conflicting standards and there is no federal law to preempt such laws, compliance with such laws could be difficult to achieve and we could be subject to fines and penalties in the event of non-compliance.
Any failure or perceived failure by us (or the third parties with whom we have contracted to process such information) to comply with applicable privacy and security laws, policies or related contractual obligations, or any compromise of security that results in unauthorized access, or the use or transmission of, personal user information, could result in a variety of claims against us, including governmental enforcement actions, significant fines, litigation, claims of breach of contract and indemnity by third parties, and adverse publicity. When such events occur, our reputation may be harmed, we may lose current and potential users and the competitive positions of our various brands might be diminished, any or all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Lastly, compliance with the numerous laws in the countries in which we operate regarding privacy and the storage, sharing, use, processing, disclosure and protection of personal data could be costly, as well as result in delays in the development of new products and features as resources are allocated to these compliance projects, particularly as these laws become more comprehensive in scope, more commonplace and continue to evolve. In addition, the varying and rapidly-evolving regulatory frameworks across jurisdictions may result in decisions to introduce products in certain jurisdictions but not others or to cease providing certain services or features to users located in certain jurisdictions. If these costs or other impacts are significant, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We are subject to a number of risks related to credit card payments, including data security breaches and fraud that we or third parties experience or additional regulation, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We accept payment from our users primarily through credit card transactions and certain online payment service providers. The ability to access credit card information on a real-time basis without having to proactively reach out to the consumer each time we process an auto-renewal payment or a payment for the purchase of a premium feature on any of our dating products is critical to our success and a seamless experience for our users.
When we or a third party experiences a data security breach involving credit card information, affected cardholders will often cancel their credit cards. In the case of a breach experienced by a third party, the more sizable the third party’s customer base and the greater the number of credit card accounts impacted, the more likely it is that our users would be impacted by such a breach. To the extent our users are ever affected by such a breach experienced by us or a third party, affected users would need to be contacted to obtain new credit card information and process any pending transactions. It is likely that we would not be able to reach all affected users, and even if we could, some users’ new credit card information may not be obtained and some pending transactions may not be processed, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Even if our users are not directly impacted by a given data security breach, they may lose confidence in the ability of service providers to protect their personal information generally, which could cause them to stop using their credit cards online and choose alternative payment methods that are not as convenient for us or restrict our ability to process payments without significant cost or user effort.
Additionally, if we fail to adequately prevent fraudulent credit card transactions, we may face litigation, fines, governmental enforcement action, civil liability, diminished public perception of our security measures, significantly higher credit card-related costs and substantial remediation costs, or refusal by credit card processors to continue to process payments on our behalf, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Finally, the passage or adoption of any legislation or regulation affecting the ability of service providers to periodically charge consumers for recurring subscription payments may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, the European Union’s Payment Services Directive (PSD2), which became effective in 2018, could impact our ability to process auto-renewal payments or offer promotional or differentiated pricing for users in the EU. Similar legislation or regulation, or changes to existing legislation or regulation governing subscription payments, are being considered in many U.S. states.
Inappropriate actions by certain of our users could be attributed to us and damage our brands’ reputations, which in turn could adversely affect our business.
TheIt is possible that a user of our products could be physically, financially, emotionally or otherwise harmed by an individual that such user met through the use of one of our products. If one or more of our users suffers or alleges to have suffered any such harm, we could experience negative publicity or legal action that could damage our reputation and our brands. Similar events affecting users of our competitors’ products could result in negative publicity for the dating industry generally, which could in turn negatively affect our business.
In addition, the reputations of our brands may be adversely affected by the actions of our users that are deemed to be hostile, offensive, defamatory, inappropriate, untrue or unlawful. While we have systems and processes in place that aim to monitor and review the appropriateness of the content accessible through our products, which include, in particular, reporting tools through which users can inform us of such behavior on the platform, and have adopted policies regarding illegal, offensive or inappropriate use of our products, our users could nonetheless engage in activities that violate our policies. These safeguards may not be sufficient to avoid harm to our reputation and brands, especially if such hostile, offensive or inappropriate use is well-publicized.
In addition, it is possible that a user of our products could be physically, financially, emotionally or otherwise harmed by an individual that such user met through the use of one of our products. If one or more of our users suffers or alleges to have suffered any such harm, we could experience negative publicity or legal action that could damage our reputation and our brands. Similar events affecting users of our competitors’ products could result in negative publicity for the dating industry generally, which could in turn negatively affect our business.
Concerns about harms and the use of dating products and social networking platforms for illegal conduct, such as romance scams, promotion of false or inaccurate information, financial fraud, and sex-trafficking, have produced and could continue to produce future legislation or other governmental action. For example, onin April 11, 2018, the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act became effective in the United States and allows victims of sex trafficking crimes, as well as other state and local authorities, to seek redress from
platforms in certain circumstances in connection with sex trafficking of individuals online. The European Union and the United Kingdom have also launched consultations, and the United Kingdom is preparing to releasehas released its Online Harms White Paper, regardingwhich proposed legislation that would expose platforms to similar or more expansive liability. There have also been calls for legislation to limit or remove the protections afforded technology platforms under the Communications Decency Act in the United States and under the e-Commerce Directive in the European Union. If these proposed laws are passed, or if future legislation or governmental action is proposed or taken to address concerns regarding such harms, changes could be required to our products that could restrict or impose additional costs upon the conduct of our business generally or cause users to abandon our products.
We may fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights or may be accused of infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties.
We rely heavily upon our trademarks and related domain names and logos to market our brands and to build and maintain brand loyalty and recognition, as well as upon trade secrets.recognition. We also rely upon patented and patent-pending proprietary technologies and trade secrets relating to matching process systems and related features and products.
We also rely on a combination of laws, and contractual restrictions with employees, customers, suppliers, affiliates and others, to establish and protect our various intellectual property rights. For example, we have generally registered and continue to apply to register and renew, or secure by contract where appropriate, trademarks and service marks as they are developed and used, and reserve, register and renew domain names as we deem appropriate. Effective trademark protection may not be available or may not be sought in every country in which our products are made available, and contractual disputes may affect the use of marks governed by private contract. Similarly, not every variation of a domain name may be available or be registered, even if available.
We also generally seek to apply for patents or for other similar statutory protections as and if we deem appropriate, based on then-current facts and circumstances, and will continue to do so in the future. No assurances can be given that any patent application we have filed or will file will result in a patent being issued, or that any existing or future patents will afford adequate protection against competitors and similar technologies. In addition, no assurances can be given that third parties will not create new products or methods that achieve similar results without infringing upon patents we own.
Despite these measures, our intellectual property rights may still not be protected in a meaningful manner, challenges to contractual rights could arise, third parties could copy or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property without authorization, or laws and interpretations of laws regarding the enforceability of existing intellectual property rights may change over time in a manner that provides less protection. The occurrence of any of these events could result in the erosion of our brands and limit our ability to market our brands using our various domain names, as well as impede our ability to effectively compete against competitors with similar technologies, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, we have been subject to legal proceedings and claims, including claims of alleged infringement of trademarks, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property rights held by third parties. In addition, litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets and patents or to determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. For example, onin March 17, 2018, we filed a lawsuit against Bumble Trading Inc., which operates and markets the online dating application Bumble in the United States, for patent and trademark infringement, as well as trade secret misappropriation. Bumble’s counterclaims request that our trademark registration for our SWIPE trademark be cancelled and that a number of our pending applications for trademark registration be denied. This case is currently pending in Federal Court in the Western District of Texas. Any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in various international markets, including certain markets in which we have limited experience. As a result, we face additional risks in connection with certain of our international operations.
Our brands are available in over 40 different languages all over the world. Our international revenue represented 50%53% and 46%50% of our total revenue for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Operating internationally, particularly in countries in which we have limited experience, exposes us to a number of additional risks, including:
•operational and compliance challenges caused by distance, language and cultural differences;
•difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
•differing levels of social and technological acceptance of our dating products or lack of acceptance of them generally;
•foreign currency fluctuations;
•restrictions on the transfer of funds among countries and back to the United States and costs associated with repatriating funds to the United States;
•differing and potentially adverse tax laws;
•multiple, conflicting and changing laws, rules and regulations, and difficulties understanding and ensuring compliance with those laws by both our employees and our business partners, over whom we exert no control;
•compliance challenges due to different laws and regulatory environments, particularly in the case of privacy, data security, and data security;intermediary liability;
•competitive environments that favor local businesses;
•limitations on the level of intellectual property protection; and
•trade sanctions, political unrest, terrorism, war and epidemics or the threat of any of these events.
The occurrence of any or all of the events described above could adversely affect our international operations, which could in turn adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may experience operational and financial risks in connection with acquisitions.
We have made numerous acquisitions in the past and we continue to seek potential acquisition candidates. We may experience operational and financial risks in connection with historical and future acquisitions if we are unable to:
•properly value prospective acquisitions, especially those with limited operating histories;
•accurately review acquisition candidates’ business practices against applicable laws and regulations and, where applicable, implement proper remediation controls, procedures, and policies;
•successfully integrate the operations, as well as the accounting, financial controls, management information, technology, human resources and other administrative systems, of acquired businesses with our existing operations and systems;
•successfully identify and realize potential synergies among acquired and existing businesses;
•fully identify potential risks and liabilities associated with acquired businesses;
•retain or hire senior management and other key personnel at acquired businesses; and
•successfully manage acquisition-related strain on our management, operations and financial resources and those of the various brands in our portfolio.
Furthermore, we may not be successful in addressing other challenges encountered in connection with our acquisitions. The anticipated benefits of one or more of our acquisitions may not be realized or the value of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired could be impacted by one or more continuing unfavorable events or trends, which could result in significant impairment charges. In addition, such acquisitions can result in material diversion of management’s attention or other resources from our existing businesses. The occurrence of any these events could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to litigation and adverse outcomes in such litigation could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
We are, and from time to time may become, subject to litigation and various legal proceedings, including litigation and proceedings related to intellectual property matters, privacy and consumer protection laws, as well as stockholder derivative suits, class action lawsuits and other matters, that involve claims for substantial amounts of money or for other relief or that might necessitate changes to our business or operations. For example, as discussed in “Item 3—Legal Proceedings,” in August 2018, ten then-current and former employees of our Tinder business filed a lawsuit against us in connection with a valuation of the Tinder business, and its subsequent merger into Match Group, Inc., in July 2017. The defense of these actions is time consuming and expensive. We evaluate these litigation claims and legal proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. Based on these assessments and estimates, we may establish reserves and/or disclose the relevant litigation claims or legal proceedings, as and when required or appropriate. These assessments and estimates are based on information available to management at the time of such assessment or estimation and involve a significant amount of judgment. As a result, actual outcomes or losses could differ materially from those envisioned by our current assessments and estimates. Our failure to successfully defend or settle any of these litigations or legal proceedings could result in liability that, to the extent not covered by our insurance, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks related to our ongoing relationship with IAC prior to the Separation
IAC controls our company and has the ability to control the direction of our business.
As of February 1, 2019,January 31, 2020, IAC owned 15,813,27718,160,609 shares of our common stock and 209,919,402 shares of Class B common stock representing 100% of our outstanding Class B common stock. IAC’s ownership of our outstanding common stock and Class B common stock represents approximately 81.1%80.7% of our outstanding shares of capital stock and approximately 97.6%97.5% of the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock. As long as IAC owns shares of our capital stock representing a majority of the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock, it will be able to control any corporate action that requires a stockholder vote, regardless of the vote
of any other stockholder. As a result, prior to the Separation, IAC has the ability to control significant corporate activities, including:
•the election of our board of directors and, through our board of directors, decision-making with respect to our business direction and policies, including the appointment and removal of our officers;
•acquisitions or dispositions of businesses or assets, mergers or other business combinations;
•issuances of shares of our common stock, Class B common stock, Class C common stock and our capital structure;
•corporate opportunities that may be suitable for us and IAC, subject to the corporate opportunity provisions in our certificate of incorporation, as described below;
•our financing activities, including the issuance of additional debt and equity securities, or the incurrence of other indebtedness generally;
•the payment of dividends; and
•the number of shares available for issuance under our equity incentive plans for our prospective and existing employees.
This voting control will limit the ability of other stockholders to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that stockholders other than IAC do not view as beneficial. This voting control may also discourage transactions involving a change of control of our company, including transactions in which holders of our common stock might otherwise receive a premium for the holders’ shares. Furthermore, IAC generally has the right at any time to sell or otherwise dispose of the shares of our capital stock that it owns, including the ability to transfer a controlling interest in us to a third party, without the approval of the holders of our common stock and without providing for the purchase of shares of common stock.
Even if IAC owns shares of our capital stock representing less than a majority of the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock, so long as IAC retains shares representing a significant percentage of our combined voting power, IAC will have the ability to substantially influence these significant corporate activities.
In addition, pursuant to an investor rights agreement between us and IAC, prior to the Separation and in the event the Separation is not consummated, IAC has the right to maintain its level of ownership in us to the extent we issue additional shares of our capital stock in the future and, pursuant to an employee matters agreement between us and IAC, IAC may receive payment for certain compensation expenses through the receipt of additional shares of our capital stock. For a more complete summary of our agreements with IAC, see “Note 15—16—Related Party Transactions” to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8—Consolidated Financial Statements.”
In addition, because of our relationship with IAC, credit rating agencies have considered, and prior to the Separation and in the event the Separation is not consummated, could continue to consider, IAC’s creditworthiness when determining a corporate credit rating for us or credit ratings for our debt, includingdebt. Accordingly, prior to the notes offered hereby. Accordingly,Separation and in the event the Separation is not consummated, the activities of, or developments at, IAC that are outside of our control could have a negative impact on such credit ratings. A lowering of our corporate credit ratings or the credit ratings assigned to our debt could harm our ability to incur additional debt on acceptable terms and may adversely affect the market price or liquidity of the notes offered hereby.terms. Until such time as IAC no longer controls or has the ability to substantially influence us, we will continue to face the risks described in this “Risk factors” section relating to IAC’s control of us and the potential conflicts of interest between IAC and us.
OurPrior to the Separation, our certificate of incorporation could prevent us from benefiting from corporate opportunities that might otherwise have been available to us.
Our certificate of incorporation has a “corporate opportunity” provision in which we renounce any interests or expectancy in corporate opportunities which become known to: (i) any of our directors or officers who are also officers, directors, employees or other affiliates of IAC or its affiliates (except that we and our subsidiaries shall not be deemed affiliates of IAC or its affiliates for the purposes of the provision) or (ii) IAC itself, and which relate to the business of IAC or may constitute a corporate opportunity for both IAC and us. Generally, neither IAC nor our officers or directors who are also officers or directors of IAC or its affiliates will be liable to us or our stockholders for breach of any fiduciary duty by reason of the fact that any such person pursues or acquires any
corporate opportunity for the account of IAC or its affiliates, directs or transfers such corporate opportunity to IAC or its affiliates, or does not communicate information regarding such corporate opportunity to us. The corporate opportunity provision may exacerbate conflicts of interest between IAC and us because the provision effectively permits any of our directors or officers who also serves as an officer or director of IAC to choose to direct a corporate opportunity to IAC instead of to us.
IAC’s interests may conflict with our interests and the interests of our stockholders. ConflictsPrior to the Separation and in the event the Separation is not consummated, conflicts of interest between IAC and us could be resolved in a manner unfavorable to us and our public stockholders.
Various conflicts of interest between us and IAC could arise. As of the date of this report, five of our ten directors are current members of the board of directors or executive officers of IAC. Ownership interests of directors or officers of IAC in our stock and ownership interests of our directors and officers in the stock of IAC, or a person’s service as either a director or officer of both companies, could create or appear to create potential conflicts of interest when those directors and officers are faced with decisions relating to our company. These decisions could include:
•corporate opportunities;
•the impact that operating decisions for our business may have on IAC’s consolidated financial statements;
•the impact that operating or capital decisions (including the incurrence of indebtedness) for our business may have on IAC’s current or future indebtedness or the covenants under that indebtedness;
•business combinations involving us;
•our dividend policy;
•management stock ownership; and
•the intercompany services and agreements between IAC and us.
Potential conflicts of interest could also arise if we decide to enter into any new commercial arrangements with IAC in the future or in connection with IAC’s desire to enter into new commercial arrangements with third parties.
Furthermore, prior to the Separation and in the event the Separation is not consummated, disputes may arise between IAC and us relating to our past and ongoing relationships, and these potential conflicts of interest may make it more difficult for us to favorably resolve such disputes, including those related to:
•tax, employee benefit, indemnification and other matters;
•the nature, quality and pricing of services IAC agrees to provide to us;
•sales or other disposal by IAC of all or a portion of its ownership interest in us; and
•business combinations involving us.
We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts with IAC, and even if we do, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing with an unaffiliated party. While we are controlled by IAC, we may not have the leverage to negotiate amendments to these agreements, if required, on terms as favorable to us as those we would negotiate with an unaffiliated third party.
We are currently a “controlled company” as defined in the NASDAQ rules, and rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to stockholders of other companies.
As a result of IAC owning more than 50% of the combined voting power of our share capital, we are currently a “controlled company” under the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, or the Marketplace Rules. As a “controlled company,” we are exempt from the obligation to comply with certain Marketplace Rules related to corporate governance, including the following requirements:
•that a majority of our board of directors consists of “independent directors,” as defined under the Marketplace Rules; and
•that we have a nominating/governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities.
Accordingly, prior to the Separation and for so long as we are a “controlled company,” our stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the Marketplace Rules.
InPrior to the Separation and in the event the Separation is not consummated, in order to preserve the ability of IAC to distribute its shares of our capital stock on a tax-free basis, and to maintain tax consolidation with IAC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we may be prevented from pursuing opportunities to raise capital, to effectuate acquisitions or to provide equity incentives to our employees, and our ability to manage our capital structure may also be adversely impacted, all of which could hurt our ability to grow.
Under current laws, IAC must retain beneficial ownership of at least 80% of our combined voting power and 80% of each class of our nonvoting capital stock (if any is outstanding) in order to effect a tax-free distribution of our shares held by IAC to its stockholders. As of the date of this annual report, IAC has advised us that it does not have any present intention or plans to undertake such a tax-free distribution. However, IAC does currently intendintends to use its majority voting interest to retain its ability to engage in such a transaction. This intentionIn addition, IAC must maintain ownership of at least 80% of our outstanding capital stock in order to maintain tax consolidation with us for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As of the date of this report, IAC has advised us that it currently intends to take such actions, or cause Match Group to take such actions, as may be necessary in order to preserve tax consolidation. Each of these intentions may cause IAC to not support transactions we wish to pursue that involve issuing shares of our commoncapital stock, including for capital raising purposes, as consideration for an acquisition or as equity incentives to our employees.employees, and may also otherwise impact our overall capital management strategy. The inability to pursue any such transactions if it occurs,or any reduced flexibility in the management of our capital structure, may adversely affect our company.business, financial condition and results of operations. See “—IAC controls our company and will have the ability to control the direction of our business” and “—IAC’s interests may conflict with our interests and the interests of our stockholders.” Conflicts of interest between IAC and us could be resolved in a manner unfavorable to us and our public stockholders.
OurPrior to the Separation and in the event the Separation is not consummated, our agreements with IAC will require us to indemnify IAC for certain tax liabilities and may limit our ability to engage in desirable strategic or capital raising transactions, including following any distribution by IAC of our capital stock to its stockholders.
Under a tax sharing agreement between us and IAC, we generally are responsible and are required to indemnify IAC for: (i) all taxes imposed with respect to any consolidated, combined or unitary tax return of IAC or one of its subsidiaries that includes us or any of our subsidiaries to the extent attributable to us or any of our subsidiaries, as determined under the tax sharing agreement, and (ii) all taxes imposed with respect to any consolidated, combined, unitary or separate tax returns of us or any of our subsidiaries. To the extent IAC failed to pay taxes imposed with respect to any consolidated, combined or unitary tax return of IAC or one of its
subsidiaries that includes us or any of our subsidiaries, the relevant taxing authority could seek to collect such taxes (including taxes for which IAC is responsible under the tax sharing agreement) from us or our subsidiaries.
Under the tax sharing agreement, we generally will be responsible for any taxes and related amounts imposed on IAC or us that arise from the failure of a future spin-off of IAC’s interest in us to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under Section 368(a)(1)(D) and/or Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, orof the Code, to the extent that the failure to so qualify is attributable to: (i) a breach of the relevant representations and covenants made by us in the tax sharing agreement or any representation letter provided in support of any tax opinion or ruling obtained by IAC with respect to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of such spin-off, or (ii) an acquisition of our equity securities.
To preserve the tax-free treatment of any potential future spin-off by IAC of its interest in us, and in addition to our indemnity obligation described above, the tax sharing agreement will restrict us, for the two-year period following any such spin-off, except in specific circumstances, from: (i) entering into any transaction pursuant to which all or a portion of shares of our stock would be acquired, whether by merger or otherwise, (ii) issuing equity securities beyond certain thresholds, (iii) repurchasing our shares other than in certain open-market transactions, (iv) ceasing to actively conduct our businesses or (v) taking or failing to take any other action that prevents the distribution and related transactions from qualifying as a transaction that is generally tax-free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under Section 368(a)(1)(D) and/or Section 355 of the Code. In addition, the tax
sharing agreement provides that, without IAC’s prior written consent, we may not take any action that could reasonably be expected to (i) cause IAC to cease to have “control” of us within the meaning of Section 386(c) of the Code or (ii) result in the loss of IAC’s tax consolidation with us for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
These indemnity obligations and other limitations could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Future sales or distributions of our shares by IAC could depress our common stock price.
IAC has the right to sell or distribute to its stockholders all or a portion of the shares of our capital stock that it holds (15,813,277(18,160,609 shares of our common stock and 209,919,402 shares of our Class B common stock, representing all of our outstanding Class B common stock, as of February 1, 2019)January 31, 2020). As of the date of this annual report, IAC has advised us that it does not have any present intention or plans to undertake such a sale or distribution; however, anyAny sales by IAC in the public market or distributions to its stockholders of substantial amounts of our stock in the form of common stock or Class B common stock, or the filing by IAC of a registration statement relating to a substantial amount of our stock, could depress the price of our common stock.
In addition, prior to the Separation and in the event the Separation is not consummated, IAC has the right, subject to certain conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering the sale of its shares or to include its shares in other registration statements that we may file. In the event IAC exercises its registration rights and sells all or a portion of its shares of our capital stock, the price of our common stock could decline.
ThePrior to the Separation and in the event the Separation is not consummated, the services that IAC provides to us may not be sufficient to meet our needs, which may result in increased costs and otherwise adversely affect our business.
IAC currently provides (and, in the event the Separation is not consummated, is expected to continue to provide) us with corporate and shared services related to certain corporate functions, including tax and other services, for a fee provided in the services agreement described in “Item 1—Business-Relationship with IAC.” IAC is not obligated to provide these services in a manner that differs from the nature of the service when we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of IAC, and thus we may not be able to modify these services in a manner desirable to us as a stand-alone public company. Further, if we no longer receive these services from IAC, we may not be able to perform these services ourselves, or find appropriate third-party arrangements at a reasonable cost, and the cost may be higher than that charged by IAC.
Risks relatedrelating to our indebtedness
Our indebtedness may affect our ability to operate our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We and our subsidiaries may incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had total debt outstanding of approximately $1.5$1.6 billion and borrowing availability of $240$500 million under our revolving credit facility.
senior notes and increased the borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility to $750 million.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences, such as:
•limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our working capital needs, acquisitions, capital expenditures or other debt service requirements or for other purposes;
•limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service debt;
•limiting our ability to compete with other companies who are not as highly leveraged, as we may be less capable of responding to adverse economic and industry conditions;
•restricting us from making strategic acquisitions, developing properties or exploiting business opportunities;
•restricting the way in which we conduct our business because of financial and operating covenants in the agreements governing our and certain of our subsidiaries’ existing and future indebtedness, including, in the case of certain indebtedness of subsidiaries, certain covenants that restrict the ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us;
•exposing us to potential events of default (if not cured or waived) under financial and operating covenants contained in our or our subsidiaries’ debt instruments that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results; increasing our vulnerability to a downturn in general economic conditions or in pricing of our products; and
•limiting our ability to react to changing market conditions in our industry and in our customers’ industries.
In addition to our debt service obligations, our operations require substantial investments on a continuing basis. Our ability to make scheduled debt payments, to refinance our obligations with respect to our indebtedness and to fund capital and non-capital expenditures necessary to maintain the condition of our operating assets and properties, as well as to provide capacity for the growth of our business, depends on our financial and operating performance, which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, competitive, legal and other factors.
Subject to the restrictions in our credit agreement (which includes our revolving credit facility and term loan) and the restrictions included in the indentures related to our 6.375% Senior Notes due 2024, 5.00% Senior Notes due 2027, and 5.625% Senior Notes due 2029, and the 4.125% Senior Notes due 2030 (the “Match Group Senior Notes”), we and our subsidiaries may incur significant additional indebtedness, including additional secured indebtedness. Although the terms of our credit agreement and the indentures related to the Match Group Senior Notes contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and additional indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be significant. If new debt is added to our and our subsidiaries’ current debt levels, the risks described above could increase.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our current and planned indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness that may not be successful.
Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations will depend upon, among other things:
•our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control; and
•our future ability to borrow under our revolving credit facility, the availability of which will depend on, among other things, our complying with the covenants in the then-existing agreements governing our indebtedness.
We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or that we will be able to draw under our revolving credit facility or otherwise, in an amount sufficient to fund our liquidity needs.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to service our indebtedness, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest
rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements may restrict us from adopting some of these alternatives. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations, sell equity, and/or negotiate with our lenders to restructure the applicable debt, in order to meet our debt service and other obligations. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions for fair market value or at all. Our credit agreement and the indentures related to the Match Group Senior Notes may restrict, or market or business conditions may limit, our ability to avail ourselves of some or all of these options.
Furthermore, any proceeds that we could realize from any such dispositions may not be adequate to meet our debt service obligations then due.
Our debt agreements contain restrictions that will limit our flexibility in operating our business.
Our credit agreement and the indentures related to the Match Group Senior Notes contain, and any instruments governing future indebtedness of ours would likely contain, a number of covenants that will impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to, among other things:
•create liens on certain assets;
•incur additional debt;
•make certain investments and acquisitions;
•consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets;
•sell certain assets;
•pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of our capital stock or make restricted payments;
•enter into certain transactions with our affiliates; and
place restrictions on•cause our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions from subsidiaries.to us.
Any of these restrictions could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions and could otherwise restrict corporate activities. Any failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default under our credit agreement and/or the indentures related to the Match Group Senior Notes or any instruments governing future indebtedness of ours. Upon a default, unless waived, the lenders under our credit agreement could elect to terminate their commitments, cease making further loans, foreclose on our assets pledged to such lenders to secure our obligations under our credit agreement and force us into bankruptcy or liquidation. Holders of the Match Group Senior Notes also have the ability to force us into bankruptcy or liquidation in certain circumstances, subject to the terms of the related indentures. In addition, a default under our credit agreement or the indentures related to the Match Group Senior Notes may trigger a cross default under our other agreements and could trigger a cross default under the agreements governing our future indebtedness. Our operating results may not be sufficient to service our indebtedness or to fund our other expenditures and we may not be able to obtain financing to meet these requirements.
Variable rate indebtedness that we have incurred or may incur under our credit agreement will subject us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.
We currently have $260 million and $425 million of indebtedness outstanding under our term loan and no outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. Borrowings under the term loan are, and any borrowings under our revolving credit facility and term loan, respectively. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility and term loan arewill be, at variable rates of interest. Indebtedness that bears interest at variable rates exposes us to interest rate risk. Our revolving credit facility andAt December 31, 2019, our term loan bearbore interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%2.50% and LIBOR plus 2.50%, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, the rate in effect was 3.97% and 5.09%, respectively.4.44%. If LIBOR were to increase or decrease by 100 basis points, then the annual interest and expense payments on the outstanding balance and rate in effect as of December 31, 20182019 on the term loan and revolving credit facility would increase or decrease, by $2.6 million andrespectively, $4.3 million, respectively.million. See also “Item 7A—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Risks relating to the Separation
We may be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve through the Separation.
The full strategic and financial benefits expected to result from the Separation may be delayed or may never occur at all. For instance, there can be no assurance that we will be able to attract transaction partners using its capital stock as acquisition currency and that analysts and investors will regard its new corporate structure as more clear and simple than our current corporate structure.
If the Transactions, including the Separation and our subsequent merger, were to fail to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we and our stockholders could suffer material adverse consequences.
If the Transactions are implemented, following the completion of the Separation and the merger of Match Group into New Match Merger Sub (the “Merger”), our successor will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of New Match Group and most of IAC’s existing other subsidiaries will be held under a separate public company. It is a
condition to each party’s obligation to the Transaction Agreement that each of IAC, Match Group, and New IAC receive opinions of IAC’s outside counsel, among other things, to the effect that the Separation and related transactions taken together, and the Merger, will be tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The opinions of counsel will be based upon and rely on, among other things, various facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements and undertakings of IAC, Match Group, and New IAC, including those relating to the past and future conduct of IAC, Match Group, and New IAC. If any of these representations, statements or undertakings is, or becomes, inaccurate or incomplete, or if any of the representations or covenants contained in any of the transaction-related agreements and documents or in any document relating to the opinions of counsel are inaccurate or not complied with by IAC, Match Group, New IAC, or any of their respective subsidiaries, the opinions of counsel may be invalid and the conclusions reached therein could be jeopardized.
Notwithstanding receipt of the opinions of counsel regarding the transactions, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could determine that some or all of the transactions effected in connection with the Transactions should be treated as taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes if it determines that any of the representations, assumptions or undertakings upon which the opinions of counsel were based are inaccurate or have not been complied with. Moreover, even if the foregoing representations, assumptions or undertakings are accurate and have been complied with, the opinions of counsel merely represent the judgment of such counsel and are not binding on the IRS or any court, and the IRS or a court may disagree with the conclusions in the opinions of counsel. Accordingly, notwithstanding receipt of the opinions of counsel, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the transactions effected in connection with the Transactions do not qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes or that a court would not sustain such a challenge. In the event the IRS were to prevail with such a challenge, parties to the Transactions, including IAC (and its successor New Match Group) could be subject to tax with respect to the Transactions.
For example, if the transactions effected in connection with the Separation were to fail to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, in general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, IAC would recognize a taxable gain as if it had sold the New IAC stock in a taxable sale for its fair market value. Even if the transactions effected in connection with the Separation were to otherwise qualify as a tax-free transaction under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code, it may result in taxable gain to IAC under Section 355(e) of the Code if the transactions effected in connection with the Separation were later deemed to be part of a plan (or series of related transactions) pursuant to which one or more persons acquire, directly or indirectly, shares representing a 50 percent or greater interest (by vote or value) in IAC or New IAC. For this purpose, any acquisitions of IAC stock (or New Match stock after the merger) or New IAC stock within the period beginning two years before the Separation and ending two years after the Separation are presumed to be part of such a plan, although IAC or New IAC may be able to rebut that presumption.
If the Transactions are implemented, because our successor and our subsidiaries will form part of New Match Group’s consolidated tax group (and because it is possible that our successor will be a disregarded entity, the regarded owner of which for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be New Match), we and our subsidiaries could be liable to satisfy any tax liabilities of New Match with respect to the Transactions if their tax-free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes were successfully challenged by the IRS. While, in some cases, New IAC may be obligated under the Tax Matters Agreement to indemnify us for some or all of such taxes, even in those cases, there is no assurance that they will in fact indemnify us.
In addition, if the Merger were determined to be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we would be subject to tax on the transfer of our assets to New Match Merger Sub. Although, as discussed above, we expect that the Transactions will be respected as tax-free, there can be no assurance in this regard. If we, our successor or our subsidiaries were required to pay taxes imposed on IAC (and its successor New Match) with respect to the Transactions, our cash flows could be adversely affected.
New Match may not be able to engage in desirable capital-raising or strategic transactions following the Separation.
Under current U.S. federal income tax law, a distribution that otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment can be rendered taxable to the distributing corporation and its stockholders as a result of certain post-distribution transactions, including certain acquisitions of shares or assets of the corporation the stock of which is distributed. To preserve the tax-free treatment of the transactions effected in connection with the Separation, the tax matters
agreement will impose certain restrictions on New Match and its subsidiaries during the two-year period following the Separation, except in specific circumstances, (1) ceasing to actively conduct certain of their businesses; (2) entering into certain transactions or series of transactions pursuant to which all or a portion of the shares of New Match common stock would be acquired, whether by merger or otherwise; (3) liquidating or merging or consolidating with any other person; (4) issuing equity securities beyond certain thresholds; (5) repurchasing shares New Match common stock, other than in certain open-market transactions; or (6) taking or failing to take any other action that would cause the transactions effected in connection with the Separation to fail to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. These restrictions may limit the ability of New Match to pursue certain equity issuances, strategic transactions, repurchases or other transactions that it may otherwise believe to be in the best interests of its stockholders or that might increase the value of its business.
After the Separation, actual or potential conflicts of interest may develop between the management and directors of New IAC, on the one hand, and the management and directors of New Match, on the other hand.
After the Separation, certain New Match directors and the management and directors of New IAC may own both New IAC common stock and New Match common stock. In addition, two of New Match’s directors will be executives, and in one case, a director, of New IAC. This ownership overlap could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when New Match’s directors and New IAC’s management and directors face decisions that could have different implications for New IAC and New Match. For example, potential conflicts of interest could arise in connection with the resolution of any dispute between New IAC and New Match regarding the terms of the agreements governing the Separation and the relationship between New IAC and New Match thereafter, including the transaction agreement, the employee matters agreement, the tax matters agreement, the transition services agreement, or any commercial agreements between the parties or their affiliates. Potential conflicts of interest could also arise if New IAC and New Match enter into any commercial arrangements in the future.
In addition, Joseph Levin will serve as the executive chairman of the New Match board of directors, while also serving as the Chief Executive Officer of New IAC, Glenn H. Schiffman will serve as a director of New Match while also serving as an executive officer of New IAC, and Alan G. Spoon will serve as a director of each of New Match and New IAC. The fact that Messrs. Levin, Schiffman, and Spoon will hold positions with both New IAC and New Match could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest for each of them when facing decisions that may affect both New IAC and New Match, and each of them also face conflicts of interest with regard to the allocation of his time between New IAC and New Match.
The Reclassification Exchange Ratio is a calculation that is subject to a number of factors that are outside of the control of IAC and Match Group and will not be known until just before the closing.
The number of shares of IAC Class M common stock into which shares of IAC common stock and IAC Class B common stock will be reclassified (which we refer to as the “Reclassification Exchange Ratio”) is a calculation that will not be known until just before the closing of the Separation and is based on a variety of factors that are outside of the control of IAC and Match Group, including, among other things, the value of the exchangeable notes issued by the exchangeable notes issuers and related hedging instruments that will be retained by New Match, the cost of the New Match stock options to be received by IAC employees in respect of their existing IAC stock options, the number of shares of IAC Class M common stock (or New Match common stock), if any, sold in the IAC Class M equity offering and the number of shares of New Match common stock issued to non-IAC stockholders of Match Group in respect of additional stock elections and non-elections. Accordingly, Match Group stockholders will not know the number of shares of IAC Class M common stock into which the shares of IAC capital stock will be reclassified, and consequently the percentage interest in New Match represented by a share of New Match common stock, until after the date of the IAC annual meeting and the date of the Match special meeting.
The Separation is subject to certain closing conditions that, if not satisfied or waived, will result in the Separation not being completed, which may cause the market price of Match Group securities to decline.
The completion of the Separation is subject to the satisfaction (or waiver) of a number of conditions, including the receipt of certain approvals from the stockholders of IAC and Match Group and the absence of material litigation. Some of the conditions to the completion of the Separation are outside of the control of IAC and Match Group. If any condition to the closing of the Separation is not satisfied or waived, the Separation will
not be completed. In addition, IAC and Match Group may terminate the transaction agreement in certain circumstances.
If IAC and Match Group do not complete the Separation, the market price of Match Group securities may fluctuate to the extent that the current market prices of the shares reflect a market assumption that the Separation will be completed. Match Group will also be obligated to pay certain investment banking, financing, legal, and accounting fees and related expenses in connection with the Separation, whether or not the Separation is completed. In addition, Match Group has expended, and will continue to expend, significant management resources in an effort to complete the Separation. If the Separation is not completed, Match Group will have incurred significant costs, including the diversion of management resources, for which it will have received little or no benefit.
New Match may incur increased expenses if the transition services agreement with New IAC is terminated.
In connection with the Separation, New Match will enter into a transition services agreement and various other agreements with New IAC, pursuant to which New IAC will provide New Match with certain specified services on a transitional basis in areas where New Match may need assistance and support following the Separation. Depending on the particular service being provided, the agreements will extend for up to twelve months after the Separation, but may be terminated earlier under certain circumstances, including a default. If the transition services agreement is terminated, New Match may be required to obtain such services from a third party. This may be more expensive than the fees that New Match will be required to pay under the agreements with New IAC.
After the Separation, New Match’s certificate of incorporation could prevent New Match from benefiting from corporate opportunities that might otherwise have been available to New Match.
Subject to obtaining the required approvals from the IAC stockholders, New Match’s certificate of incorporation following the Separation is expected to have a “corporate opportunity” provision in which New Match and its affiliates renounce any interests or expectancy in corporate opportunities which become known to any of New Match’s directors or officers who are also officers or directors of New IAC.
Generally, New Match’s officers or directors who are also New IAC’s officers or directors will not be liable to New Match or its stockholders for breach of any fiduciary because such person fails to communicate or offer to New Match a corporate opportunity that has been communicated or offered to New IAC, that may also be a corporate opportunity of New Match or because such person communicates or offers to New IAC any corporate opportunity that may also be a corporate opportunity of New Match. In order for any New Match director or officer who is also a New IAC director or officer not to be liable to New Match or its stockholders, such opportunity cannot become known to the officer or director in his or her capacity as a New Match director or officer and cannot be presented to any party other than New IAC. In addition, such officer or director cannot pursue such opportunity in his or her individual capacity. The corporate opportunity provision may exacerbate conflicts of interest between New IAC and New Match because the provision effectively permits any of New Match’s directors or officers who also serve as an officer or director of New IAC to choose to direct a corporate opportunity to New IAC instead of to New Match.
Exchange of the exchangeable notes may dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders or may otherwise depress the price of New Match common stock.
In connection with the Separation, New Match will retain IAC’s obligations as a guarantor under the indentures relating to the exchangeable notes. Following completion of the Separation, the exchangeable notes will continue to be exchangeable into shares of New Match common stock in certain circumstances. The exchange of some or all of the exchangeable notes may dilute the ownership interests of New Match stockholders to the extent New Match delivers shares upon exchange of any of the exchangeable notes. While the exchangeable note hedges are expected to reduce the potential dilutive effect on New Match common stock upon any exchange of exchangeable notes and/or offset any cash payment the issuers of the exchangeable notes would be required to make in excess of the principal amount of the exchanged notes, the warrants have a dilutive effect to the extent that the market price per share of New Match common stock exceeds the strike price of the warrants. Any sales in the public market of New Match common stock issuable upon such exchange could adversely affect prevailing market prices of New Match common stock. In addition, the existence of the exchangeable notes may encourage short selling of New Match common stock by market participants because the exchange of the exchangeable notes
could be used to satisfy short positions. In addition, the anticipated exchange of the exchangeable notes could depress the price of New Match common stock.
The shares of New Match common stock to be received by Match stockholders as a result of the Separation will have different rights from the shares of Match common stock and Match Class B common stock currently held.
Upon completion of the Separation, Match Group stockholders will become New Match stockholders and their rights as stockholders will be governed by New Match’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Certain of the rights associated with New Match common stock are different from the rights associated with Match Group common stock and Class B common stock. For example, under New Match’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws, New Match stockholders (i) will be entitled to one vote per share, (ii) will not have the power to call special meetings of stockholders, (iii) if approved by IAC stockholders at the IAC annual meeting, will not have the power to remove directors without cause and will not have the power to fill director vacancies and (iv) if approved by IAC stockholders at the IAC annual meeting, will not have the power to act by written consent.
Risks relatedrelating to ownership of our common stock prior to the Separation
The multi-class structure of our capital stock has the effect of concentrating voting control with holders of our Class B common stock and limiting the ability of holders of our common stock to influence corporate matters.
Our publicly held common stock has one vote per share and our Class B common stock has ten votes per share. As of February 1, 2019,January 31, 2020, IAC owned all of the shares of our outstanding Class B common stock and 15,813,27718,160,609 shares of our common stock, collectively representing approximately 81.1%80.7% of our outstanding shares of capital stock and approximately 97.6%97.5% of the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock. Due to the ten-to-one voting ratio between our Class B common stock and common stock, the holders of our Class B common stock collectively will continue to control a majority of the combined voting power of our capital stock, even when the outstanding shares of Class B common stock represent a small minority of our outstanding capital stock, and such voting control will be concentrated with IAC. This concentrated control will significantly limit your ability to influence corporate matters.
The difference in the voting rights of our common stock and our Class B common stock may harm the value and liquidity of our common stock.
Holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share and holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. The difference in the voting rights of our common stock and Class B common stock could harm the value of our common stock to the extent that any investor or potential future purchaser of our common stock ascribes value to the right of the holders of our Class B common stock to ten votes per share. The existence of two classes of common stock with different voting rights could result in less liquidity for either class of stock than if there were only one class of our common stock.
The price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
During 2018,2019, our common stock closing price traded as high as $60.05$91.77 and as low as $31.40$41.12 and on February 27, 2019,26, 2020, the closing price of our common stock was $55.78.$66.04. The market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. These fluctuations could cause you to lose part of your investment in our common stock since you might be unable to sell your shares at or above the price you paid. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the market price of our common stock include the following:
•price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
•volatility in the market prices and trading volumes of technology stocks generally, or those in our industry in particular;
•changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular;
•volatility in the market price of our common stock due to the limited number of shares of our common stock held by the public;
•sales of shares of our stock by us and/or our directors, executive officers, employees and stockholders;
•the failure of securities analysts to maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts who follow our company or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;
•the financial projections we may provide to the public, and any changes in those projections or our failure to meet those projections;
•announcements by us or our competitors of new brands, products or services;
•the public’s reaction to our earnings releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC;
•rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in our industry;
•actual or anticipated changes in our operating results or fluctuations in our operating results;
•actual or anticipated developments in our business, our competitors’ businesses or the competitive landscape generally;
•litigation involving us, our industry or both, or investigations by regulators into our operations or those of our competitors;
•developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights;
•announced or completed acquisitions of businesses or technologies by us or our competitors;
•new laws or regulations or new interpretations of (or changes to) existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;
•changes in accounting standards, policies, guidelines, interpretations or principles;
•any significant change in our management;management or our board composition; and
•general economic conditions and slow or negative growth in any of our significant markets.
In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. We currently are, and in the future may be, the target of this type of litigation. See “Item 3—Legal Proceedings.” Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.
You may experience dilution due tothe issuance of additional securities in the future.
Our dilutive securities consist of vested and unvested options to purchase shares of our common stock, restricted stock unit awards, shares of our common stock issuable to IAC as reimbursement for the cost of vested and unvested IAC equity awards held by our employees and stock appreciation rights settled in IAC stock.
These dilutive securities are reflected in our share calculations underlying our dilutive earnings per share calculation contained in our financial statements for fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016.2017. For more information, see “Note 10—Earnings per Share” to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8—Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Intra-quarter movements in our stock price, could lead to more or less dilution than reflected in these calculations.
At the option of IAC, the shares Match Group issues in connection with former subsidiary equity awards, which were converted into Match Group equity awards in 2017, will either be issued to holders of such awards or to IAC. In the event they are issued to IAC, IAC would in turn provide the equity holders with IAC shares of equivalent value to the Match Group shares issued to it. In cases where Match Group shares are issued directly to equity holders, recipients may sell such stock into the open market. If sales are significant and concentrated, these sales could have a temporary impact on the trading value of our stock.
Our quarterly results or operating metrics could fluctuate significantly, which could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.
Our quarterly results and operating metrics have fluctuated historically, and we expect that they could continue to fluctuate in the future as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control and may be difficult to predict, including:
•the timing, size and effectiveness of our marketing efforts;
•fluctuations in the rate at which we attract new users, the level of engagement of such users and the propensity of such users to subscribe to our brands or to purchase à la carte features;
•increases or decreases in our revenues and expenses caused by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
•the timing, size and effectiveness of non-marketing operating expenses that we may incur to grow and expand our operations, develop new products and remain competitive;
•the performance, reliability and availability of our technology, network systems and infrastructure and data centers;
•operational and financial risks we may experience in connection with historical and potential future acquisitions and investments;
•legal costs and settlements; and
•general economic conditions in either domestic or international markets.
The occurrence of any one of these factors, as well as other factors, or the cumulative effect of the occurrence of one or more of such factors could cause our quarterly results and operating metrics to fluctuate significantly. As a result, quarterly comparisons of results and operating metrics may not be meaningful.
In addition, the variability and unpredictability of our quarterly results or operating metrics could result in our failure to meet our expectations, or those of any of our investors or of analysts that cover our company, with respect to revenues or other operating results for a particular period. If we fail to meet or exceed such expectations for these or any other reasons, the market price of our common stock could fall substantially.
We do not expect to declare any regular cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We paid a special cash dividend in December 2018; however, we have no current plans to pay cash dividends on our common stock and Class B common stock. Instead, we anticipate that all of our future earnings will be retained to support our operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made by our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including:
•our historichistorical and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations;
•our capital levels and needs;
•tax considerations;
•any acquisitions or potential acquisitions that we may consider;
•statutory and regulatory prohibitions and other limitations;
•the terms of any credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements that restrict our ability to pay cash dividends, including the Match Group Credit Agreement and the indentureindentures relating to the Match Group Senior Notes;
•general economic conditions; and
•other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
We are not obligated to pay dividends on our common stock or Class B common stock. Consequently, investors may need to rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment. Investors seeking regular cash dividends should not purchase our common stock.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws or Delaware law may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our common stock.
Delaware corporate law and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management that the stockholders of our company may deem advantageous, including provisions which:
•authorize the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that our board could issue to increase the number of outstanding shares and to discourage a takeover attempt;
•limit the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;
•provide that certain litigation against us can only be brought in Delaware; and
•provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our bylaws.
Any provision of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Match Group’s corporate headquarters consists of approximately 73,000 square feet of office space in Dallas, Texas. This office space, which also houses offices forGroup believes that the Match and Match Affinity brands, is leased pursuant to a lease agreement that expires on March 31, 2027. We do not own any real property.
The facilities for our various businesses,its management and operations are generally adequate for its current and near-term future needs. Match Group’s facilities, most of which we leaseare leased (in some cases, from IAC) bothin various cities in the United States and abroad, generally consist of executive and administrative offices and data centers. We lease space in five data centers: three for our North American, Latin American and Asian operations (one in Dallas, Texas, one in Waco, Texas and one in Vancouver, British Columbia), and two for our European operations (one in Paris, France and another in Zaventem, Belgium).
We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet our ongoing needs. We also believe that, if we require additional space, we will be able to lease additional facilities on commercially reasonable terms.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Overview
We are, and from time to time may become, involved in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business activities, such as patent infringement claims, trademark oppositions, and consumer or advertising complaints, as well as stockholder derivative actions, class action lawsuits, and other matters. The amounts that may be recovered in such matters may be subject to insurance coverage. The litigation matters described below involve issues or claims that may be of particular interest to our stockholders, regardless of whether any of these matters may be material to our financial position or results of operations based upon the standard set forth in the SEC’s rules.
Consumer Class Action Litigation Challenging Tinder’s Age-Tiered Pricing
On May 28, 2015, a putative state-wide class action was filed against Tinder in state court in California. SeeAllan Candelore v. Tinder, Inc., No. BC583162 (Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles). The complaint principally alleged that Tinder violated California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”) by offering and charging users age 30 and over a higher price than younger users for subscriptions to its premium Tinder Plus service. The complaint sought certification of a class of California Tinder Plus subscribers age 30 and over and damages in an unspecified amount. On September 21, 2015, Tinder filed a demurrer seeking dismissal of the complaint. On October 26, 2015, the court issued an opinion sustaining Tinder’s demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend, ruling that the age-based pricing differential for Tinder Plus subscriptions did not violate California law in essence because offering a discount to users under age 30 was neither invidious nor unreasonable in light of that age group’s generally more limited financial means. On December 29, 2015, in accordance with its ruling, the court entered judgment dismissing the action. On February 1, 2016, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from the judgment, and the parties thereafter briefed the appeal. On January 29, 2018, the California Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) issued an opinion reversing the judgment of dismissal, ruling that the lower court had erred in sustaining Tinder’s demurrer because the complaint, as pleaded, stated a cognizable claim for violation of the Unruh Act. Because we believe that the appellate court’s reasoning was flawed as a matter of law and runs afoul of binding California precedent, on March 12, 2018, Tinder filed a petition with the California Supreme Court seeking interlocutory review of the Court of Appeal’s decision. On May 9, 2018, the California Supreme Court denied the petition. The case has beenwas then returned to the trial court for further proceedingsproceedings.
In a related development, on June 19, 2019, in a substantially similar putative class action asserting the same substantive claims and is currentlypending in discovery.federal district court in California, the court issued an order granting final approval of a class-wide settlement, the terms of which are not material to the Company. See Lisa Kim v. Tinder, Inc., No. 18-cv-3093 (U.S. District Court, Central District of California). On June 21, 2019, the Kim court entered judgment in accordance with its prior order. Because the approved settlement class in Kim subsumes the proposed settlement class in Candelore, the judgment in Kim would effectively render Candelore a single-plaintiff lawsuit. Accordingly, on July 11, 2019, two objectors to the Kim settlement, represented by the plaintiff’s counsel in Candelore, filed a notice of appeal from the Kim judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The parties are in the process of briefing the appeal.
On September 13, 2019, Tinder filed a motion to stay the Candelore case pending the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the appeal of the court-approved settlement in the Kim case. On November 13, 2019, the court issued an order staying the class claims in the Candelore case pending the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the Kim appeal. We believe that the allegations in thisthe Candelore lawsuit are without merit and will continue to defend vigorously against it.
Bumble Claims against Match Group, LLC
On March 28, 2018, Bumble and its parent company filed a lawsuit against Match Group, LLC (“Match”) in state court in Texas. SeeBumble Trading, Inc. and Bumble Holding, Ltd. v. Match Group, LLC, No. DC-18-04140 (160th Judicial District Court of Texas, County of Dallas). The petition alleged that Match wrongfully obtained confidential information from the plaintiffs in connection with a potential Bumble sale process and filed an intellectual property lawsuit against Bumble in bad faith to undermine that process. The petition asserts claims for
tortious interference with business relationships, fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, promissory estoppel, and disparagement. The petition seeks damages in excess of $400 million and an injunction against interference with the plaintiffs’ prospective business relationships or use of their confidential information. On September 26, 2018, Match filed its answer and counterclaims, a notice of removal of the case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and a motion to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, where Match’s intellectual property lawsuit against Bumble is pending. On October 18, 2018, Bumble filed a motion to dismiss its own petition without prejudice. On November 1, 2018, Match opposed the motion as an attempt to circumvent the federal court’s jurisdiction and also amended its counterclaims to seek declaratory judgments of non-liability on the claims asserted in Bumble’s petition. On November 15, 2018, Bumble filed a motion to dismiss those counterclaims, which motion Match has opposed. On November 29, 2018, the court granted Match’s motion to transfer the case to the Western District of Texas. On January 15, 2019, Bumble filed a motion for leave to file another petition, this one against Match and IAC/InterActiveCorp, in state court in Dallas County. Bumble’s proposed claims are for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unfair competition, promissory estoppel, and interference with prospective business relations and are based upon the allegation that Match and IAC misled Bumble in its sale process by falsely representing they would make a higher offer to purchase Bumble. On January 22, 2019, Match filed its opposition to Bumble’s motion for leave. In response to Match’s original intellectual property lawsuit (18-cv-80), Bumble also answered and counterclaimed on January 25, 2019. Bumble’s counterclaims ask the district court to cancel Match’s trademark registration for its SWIPE trademark and to deny registration of a number of pending applications for which Match seeks trademark registration. On February 15, 2019, Bumble amended those counterclaims to also seek declarations that Bumble does not infringe the patents asserted in Match’s complaint and that those patents are invalid. We believe that the plaintiffs’ allegations in both the pending and the proposed lawsuits are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend against them.
Tinder Optionholder Litigation againstAgainst IAC and Match Group
On August 14, 2018, ten then-current and former employees of Match Group, LLC or Tinder, Inc. (“Tinder”), an operating business of Match Group, filed a lawsuit in New York state court against IAC and Match Group. See Sean Rad et al. v. IAC/InterActiveCorp and Match Group, Inc., No. 654038/2018 (Supreme Court, New York County). The complaint alleges that in 2017, the defendants: (i) wrongfully interfered with a contractually established process for the independent valuation of Tinder by certain investment banks, resulting in a substantial undervaluation of Tinder and a consequent underpayment to the plaintiffs upon exercise of their Tinder stock options, and (ii) then wrongfully merged Tinder into Match Group, thereby depriving onecertain of the plaintiffs (Mr. Rad) of histheir contractual right to later valuations of Tinder on a stand-alone basis. The complaint asserts claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, interference with contractual relations (as against Match Group only), and interference with prospective economic advantage, and seeks compensatory damages in the amount of at least $2 billion, as well as punitive damages. On August 31, 2018, four plaintiffs who were still employed by Match Group filed a notice of discontinuance of their claims without prejudice, leaving the six former employees as the remaining plaintiffs.
On October 9, 2018, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on various grounds, including that the 2017 valuation of Tinder by the investment banks was an expert determination any challenge to which is both time-barred under applicable law and available only on narrow substantive grounds that the plaintiffs have not pleaded in their complaint.complaint; the plaintiffs opposed the motion. On December 17, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their oppositionJune 13, 2019, the court issued a decision and order (i) granting the motion to dismiss the claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and for unjust enrichment, (ii) granting the motion to dismiss the merger-related claim for breach of contract as to two of the remaining six plaintiffs, and (iii) otherwise denying the motion to dismiss. On JanuaryJune 21, 2019, the defendants filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s partial denial of their motion to dismiss, and the parties thereafter briefed the appeal. On October 29, 2019, the Appellate Division, First Department, issued an order affirming the lower court’s decision. On November 22, 2019, the defendants filed a motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal the Appellate Division’s order to the New York Court of Appeals; the plaintiffs opposed the motion, which remains pending.
On June 3, 2019, the defendants filed a second motion to dismiss based upon certain provisions of the plaintiffs’ agreement with a litigation funding firm; the plaintiffs have opposed the motion, which remains pending. On July 15, 2019, the defendants filed their reply brief. A hearingan answer denying the material allegations of the complaint, as well as counterclaims against Sean Rad for breach of contract and unjust enrichment based upon his alleged misappropriation of confidential company information. On September 13, 2019, the defendants filed an amended answer and counterclaims, adding claims based on Rad’s alleged unauthorized recording of conversations with company employees. On November 21, 2019, the motion is scheduled for March 6, 2019,defendants filed a second amended answer and counterclaims, adding claims based on Rad’s alleged unauthorized destruction of company information and breach of his non-solicitation obligations.
Document discovery in the case is proceeding. IACsubstantially complete and deposition discovery is underway. On January 30, 2020, the parties participated in a mediation that did not result in resolution of the matter. We believe that the
allegations against Match Group believe that the allegationsand IAC in this lawsuit are without merit and will continue to defend vigorously against it.
FTC Investigation of Certain Match.com Business PracticesLawsuit Against Match Group
In March 2017, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) requested information and documents in connection with a civil investigation regarding certain business practices of Match.com. The FTC raised potential claims relating to Match.com’s marketing, chargeback, and online cancellation practices. In November 2018, the FTC proposed to resolve its potential claims relating to Match.com’s marketing, chargeback and online cancellation practices via a consent judgment mandatingrequiring certain changes in the company’s businessthose practices, as well as a payment$60 million payment. Ensuing discussions between the Company and the FTC ended without resolution.
On August 7, 2019, the FTC voted to assert claims against the Company and referred the matter to the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”). The DOJ subsequently declined to pursue a civil case against the Company and referred the matter back to the FTC.
On September 25, 2019, the FTC filed a lawsuit in the amountNorthern District of $60 million. Texas against Match Group. See FTC v. Match Group, Inc., No. 3:19:cv-02281-K (N.D. Tex.). The complaint alleges that, prior to mid-2018, for marketing purposes Match.com told non-paying users that other users were trying to communicate with them, even though Match.com had identified those subscriber accounts as potentially fraudulent, thereby inducing non-paying users to subscribe and exposing them to the risk of fraud should they subscribe. The complaint also challenges the adequacy of Match.com’s disclosure of the terms of its six-month guarantee, the efficacy of its cancellation process, and its handling of chargeback disputes. The complaint seeks among other things permanent injunctive relief, civil penalties, restitution, disgorgement, and costs of suit. On October 17, 2019, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The FTC opposed the motion, which remains pending.
On September 26, 2019, the Company received a grand-jury subpoena from the DOJ for documents relating to certain of the marketing-related claims in the FTC’s complaint. The Company has cooperated with the DOJ in responding to its subpoena.
Match Group believes that the FTC’s legal challenges toclaims regarding Match.com’s practices, policies, and procedures are without merit and is prepared towill defend vigorously defend against them.
Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Match Group
On October 3, 2019, a Match Group shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit in federal court in Texas against Match Group, Inc., its CEO, and its CFO, on behalf of a class of acquirers of Match Group securities between August 6, 2019 and September 25, 2019. SeePhillip R. Crutchfield v. Match Group, Inc., Amanda W. Ginsberg, and Gary Swidler, No. 3:19-cv-02356-C (Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division). Invoking the allegations in the FTC lawsuit described above, the complaint alleges (i) that Defendants failed to disclose to investors that the Company induced customers to buy and upgrade subscriptions using misleading advertisements, that the Company made it difficult for customers to cancel their subscriptions, and that, as a result, the Company was likely to be subject to regulatory scrutiny; (ii) that the Company lacked adequate disclosure controls and procedures; and (iii) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. On January 6, 2020, the court approved a stipulation appointing two lead plaintiffs as well as co-lead counsel. On January 23, 2020, the Court entered a scheduling order, which allows Lead Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint on or before March 23, 2020. Match Group believes that the allegations in this lawsuit are without merit and will defend vigorously against them.
House Oversight Committee Investigation of Online Dating
On January 30, 2020, Match Group, Inc. received a letter from the House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy (the “Oversight Committee”) regarding its inquiry into underage use of online dating services and efforts by those services to remove registered sex offenders from their platforms. The Oversight Committee is also inquiring about under what circumstances online dating services share or sell sensitive user information with third parties. The Oversight Committee has requested documents and information related to its inquiry. The Company is cooperating with the investigation.
Irish Data Protection Commission Inquiry Regarding Tinder’s Practices
On February 3, 2020, we received a letter from the Irish Data Protection Commission (the “DPC”) notifying us that the DPC has commenced an inquiry examining Tinder’s compliance with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, focusing on Tinder’s processes for handling access and deletion requests and Tinder’s user data retention policies. We are planning to fully cooperate with the DPC in connection with this inquiry.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the ticker symbol “MTCH.” There is no established public trading market for our Class B common stock. As of February 27, 2019,26, 2020, the closing price of our common stock on NASDAQ was $55.78.$66.04.
As of February 1, 2019,January 31, 2020, there were 2226 holders of record of the Company’s common stock and one holder of record of the Company’s Class B common stock. Because the substantial majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of shareholders, we are not able to estimate the total number of beneficial shareholders represented by these record holders.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
Under the terms of the Employee Matters Agreement dated as of November 24, 2015, by and between IAC/InterActiveCorp (“IAC”) and Match Group, Inc. (the “Company”), as amended effective as of April 13, 2016 (the “Employee Matters Agreement”), IAC may cause certain equity awards of the Company to be settled in shares of IAC common stock, par value $0.001 (“IAC Common Stock”) and cause the Company to reimburse IAC for the cost of such shares of IAC Common Stock by issuing shares of Company common stock, par value $0.001 (“Company Common Stock”) to IAC. The Employee Matters Agreement also provides that the Company will reimburse IAC for the cost of any IAC equity awards held by the Company’s employees and former employees and that IAC may elect to receive payment either in cash or Company Common Stock.
On December 31, 2018, 94,3512019, 122,696 shares of Company Common Stock were issued to IAC as reimbursement for shares of IAC Common Stock issued in connection with the exercise of IAC stock options held by Match Group employees.
On December 3, 2018October 31, 2019; November 30, 2019; and December 31, 2018, 306,1312019, 4,385; 66,789; and 15,29422,841 shares, respectively, of Company Common Stock were issued to IAC as reimbursement for shares of IAC Common Stock issued in connection with the exercise and settlement of equity shares of a subsidiary of the Company pursuant to the Employee Matters Agreement.
The issuances of Company Common Stock described above did not involve any underwriters or public offerings and the Company believes that such issuances were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of such act.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth purchases by the Company of its common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2018:2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid Per Share | | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1) | | (d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(2) |
October 2018 | 369,658 |
| | $ | 50.41 |
| | 369,658 |
| | 3,617,742 |
|
November 2018 | 670,266 |
| | $ | 42.64 |
| | 670,266 |
| | 2,947,476 |
|
December 2018 | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | 2,947,476 |
|
Total | 1,039,924 | | $ | 45.40 |
| | 1,039,924 |
| | 2,947,476 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid Per Share | | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1) | | (d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(2) |
October 2019 | 331,260 | | | $ | 73.64 | | | 331,260 | | | 9,938,071 | |
November 2019 | — | | | $ | — | | | — | | | 9,938,071 | |
December 2019 | 80,400 | | | $ | 68.16 | | | 80,400 | | | 9,857,671 | |
Total | 411,660 | | | $ | 72.57 | | | 411,660 | | | 9,857,671 | |
______________________
| |
(1) | Reflects repurchases made pursuant to the 6 million share repurchase authorization previously announced in May 2017, which has no expiration. |
| |
(2) | Represents the total number of shares of common stock that remained available for repurchase pursuant to the May 2017 repurchase authorization. The timing and actual number of any shares repurchased will |
(1)Reflects repurchases made pursuant to the repurchase program originally authorized in May 2017, which has no expiration. On August 30, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase to the repurchase program of 10 million shares, resulting in a total repurchase authorization of 16 million shares.
shares of common stock that remained available for repurchase pursuant to the Company’s repurchase program, including the increase of 10 million shares authorized on August 30, 2019. The timing and actual number of any shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including price, general business and market conditions, and alternative investment opportunities. The
Company is not obligated to purchase any shares under the repurchase program, and repurchases may be commenced, suspended or discontinued from time to time without prior notice.
Dividend
On December 19, 2018, we paid a special dividend of $2.00 per share on Match Group common stock and Class B common stock, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 5, 2018.
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total return (assuming dividend reinvestment, as applicable) of Match Group common stock, the NASDAQ Composite index, the Russell 1000 Technology Index, and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, in each case, based on $100 invested at the close of trading on November 19, 2015 through December 31, 2019. In accordance with applicable SEC rules, Match Group presents the cumulative return of peer issuers. Match Group has selected the NASDAQ Composite Index and the Russell 1000 Technology Index as its peer issuers because they both include companies engaged in many of the same businesses as Match Group. The returns shown are based on historical results and are not intended to suggest future performance.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Match Group, Inc. Common Stock
Among Match Group, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index,
the Russell 1000 Technology Index, and the S&P 500 Index
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 11/19/2015 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2016 | | 12/31/2017 | | 12/31/2018 | | 12/31/2019 |
Match Group, Inc. | $100.00 | | $91.93 | | $116.01 | | $212.42 | | $305.27 | | $586.05 |
NASDAQ Composite Index | $100.00 | | $98.82 | | $107.68 | | $139.70 | | $135.77 | | $185.65 |
Russell 1000 Technology Index | $100.00 | | $97.81 | | $111.59 | | $154.44 | | $152.58 | | $224.62 |
S&P 500 Index | $100.00 | | $98.43 | | $110.20 | | $134.25 | | $128.35 | | $168.75 |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The selected financial data set forth in the table below as of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015 and for the years then ended were derived from our audited consolidated and combined financial statements. The selected financial data set forth in the table below as of December 31, 2014 and for the year then ended were derived from our audited combined financial statements. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included herein.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | | | | | | | | |
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | $ | 2,051,258 | | | $ | 1,729,850 | | | $ | 1,330,661 | | | $ | 1,118,110 | | | $ | 909,705 | |
Earnings from continuing operations | 534,425 | | | 472,969 | | | 355,977 | | | 178,341 | | | 133,163 | |
Loss from discontinued operations | — | | | (378) | | | (5,650) | | | (6,328) | | | (12,676) | |
Net earnings attributable to Match Group, Inc. shareholders | 534,731 | | | 477,939 | | | 350,148 | | | 171,451 | | | 120,383 | |
Earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Match Group, Inc. shareholders: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 1.91 | | | $ | 1.73 | | | $ | 1.35 | | | $ | 0.71 | | | $ | 0.76 | |
Diluted | $ | 1.81 | | | $ | 1.61 | | | $ | 1.20 | | | $ | 0.66 | | | $ | 0.72 | |
Earnings per share attributable to Match Group, Inc. shareholders: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 1.91 | | | $ | 1.73 | | | $ | 1.33 | | | $ | 0.68 | | | $ | 0.69 | |
Diluted | $ | 1.81 | | | $ | 1.61 | | | $ | 1.18 | | | $ | 0.64 | | | $ | 0.65 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Dividend declared per share | $ | — | | | $ | 2.00 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 2,423,712 | | | $ | 2,053,061 | | | $ | 2,130,146 | | | $ | 2,048,678 | | | $ | 1,909,392 | |
Long-term debt, net including current maturities | 1,603,483 | | | 1,515,911 | | | 1,252,696 | | | 1,176,493 | | | 1,216,871 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | $ | 1,729,850 |
| | $ | 1,330,661 |
| | $ | 1,118,110 |
| | $ | 909,705 |
| | $ | 836,458 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations | 472,969 |
| | 355,977 |
| | 178,341 |
| | 133,163 |
| | 165,091 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations | (378 | ) | | (5,650 | ) | | (6,328 | ) | | (12,676 | ) | | (16,732 | ) |
Net earnings attributable to Match Group, Inc. shareholders | 477,939 |
| | 350,148 |
| | 171,451 |
| | 120,383 |
| | 147,764 |
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Match Group, Inc. shareholders: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 1.73 |
| | $ | 1.35 |
| | $ | 0.71 |
| | $ | 0.76 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
|
Diluted | $ | 1.61 |
| | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 0.66 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.98 |
|
Earnings per share attributable to Match Group, Inc. shareholders: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | 1.73 |
| | $ | 1.33 |
| | $ | 0.68 |
| | $ | 0.69 |
| | $ | 0.92 |
|
Diluted | $ | 1.61 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.65 |
| | $ | 0.88 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Dividend declared per share | $ | 2.00 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| (In thousands) |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 2,053,061 |
| | $ | 2,130,146 |
| | $ | 2,048,678 |
| | $ | 1,909,392 |
| | $ | 1,302,109 |
|
Long-term debt, net including current maturities | 1,515,911 |
| | 1,252,696 |
| | 1,176,493 |
| | 1,216,871 |
| | — |
|
Long-term debt, related party | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 190,586 |
|
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Separation
On December 19, 2019, Match Group and IAC entered into the Transaction Agreement pursuant to which, following the satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including IAC and Match Group stockholder approval, the businesses of Match Group will be separated from the remaining businesses of IAC through Transactions that will result in two, separate public companies—(1) IAC, which will be re-named “Match Group, Inc.” and which will own the businesses of Match Group and certain IAC financing subsidiaries, and (2) IAC Holdings, Inc., which will be re-named “IAC/InterActiveCorp” and which will own IAC’s other businesses—and the pre-transaction stockholders of Match Group and of IAC owning shares in New Match.
For additional information relating to the Separation and the related transactions and agreements, see “Part I—Item 1—Business—Relationship with IAC—Separation.”
Key Terms:
Operating metrics:
•North America - consists of the financial results and metrics associated with users located in the United States and Canada.
•International - consists of the financial results and metrics associated with users located outside of the United States and Canada.
•Direct Revenue - is revenue that is received directly from end users of our products and includes both subscription and à la carte revenue.
•Indirect Revenue - is revenue that is not received directly from an end user of our products, substantially all of which is advertising revenue.
•Subscribers - are users who purchase a subscription to one of our products. Users who purchase only à la carte features are not included in Subscribers.
•Average Subscribers - is the number of Subscribers at the end of each day in the relevant measurement period divided by the number of calendar days in that period.
•Average Revenue per Subscriber (“ARPU”) - is Direct Revenue from Subscribers in the relevant measurement period (whether in the form of subscription or à la carte revenue) divided by the Average Subscribers in such period and further divided by the number of calendar days in such period. Direct Revenue from users who are not Subscribers and have purchased only à la carte features is not included in ARPU.
Operating costs and expenses:
•Cost of revenue - consists primarily of the amortization of in-app purchase fees, compensation expense (including stock-based compensation expense) and other employee-related costs for personnel engaged in data center and customer care functions, credit card processing fees, hosting fees, and data center rent, energy, and bandwidth costs. In-app purchase fees are monies paid to Apple and Google in connection with the processing of in-app purchases of subscriptions and product features through the in-app payment systems provided by Apple and Google.
•Selling and marketing expense - consists primarily of advertising expenditures and compensation expense (including stock-based compensation expense) and other employee-related costs for personnel engaged in selling and marketing, and sales support functions. Advertising expenditures includes online marketing, including fees paid to search engines and social media sites, offline marketing (which is primarily television advertising), and payments to partners that direct traffic to our brands.
•General and administrative expense - consists primarily of compensation expense (including stock-based compensation expense) and other employee-related costs for personnel engaged in executive management, finance, legal, tax and human resources, acquisition-related contingent consideration fair value adjustments (described below), fees for professional services (including transaction-related costs for acquisitions), and facilities costs.
•Product development expense - consists primarily of compensation expense (including stock-based compensation expense) and other employee-related costs that are not capitalized for personnel engaged in the design, development, testing, and enhancement of product offerings and related technology.
•Acquisition-related contingent consideration fair value adjustments - relate to the portion of the purchase price of certain acquisitions that is contingent upon the future earningsfinancial performance and/or operating metricsmetric targets of the acquired company. The fair value of the liability is estimated at the date of acquisition and adjusted each reporting period until the liability is settled. Significant changes in forecasted earnings and/or operating metrics will result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The changes in the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration arrangements during each reporting period, including the accretion of the discount if the arrangement is longer than
one year, are recognized in “General and administrative expense” in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
Long-term debt:
•Credit Facility - OnThe Company’s revolving credit facility. At December 7, 2018, the Company’s31, 2019, $500 million revolving credit facilitywas available under the Credit Facility and the Credit Facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%. On February 13, 2020, the Credit Facility was amended to, among other things, modifyincrease the leverage ratio levels in the pricing grid usedavailable borrowing capacity from $500 million to calculate the applicable$750 million, reduce interest rate margins by 0.125% to LIBOR plus 1.375%, and extend its maturity tofrom December 7, 2023.2023 to February 13, 2025.
•Term Loan - The Credit Facility currently bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%, based on a pricing grid included in the credit agreement.Company’s $425 million term loan. At December 31, 2018, $260 million is outstanding.
2019, the Term Loan - The Company’s seven-year term loan due November 16, 2022. The Term Loan bearsbore interest at LIBOR plus 2.50% and has athe then applicable rate was 4.44%. On February 13, 2020, the Term Loan was amended to reprice the outstanding balance to LIBOR floor of 0.00%. At December 31, 2018, $425 million is outstanding.
6.75% Senior Notes - The Company’s previously outstanding 6.75% Senior Notes issued onplus 1.75% and extend its maturity from November 16, 2015 which were redeemed in full on December 17, 2017 using the proceeds from the 5.00% Senior Notes and cash on hand.
2022 to February 13, 2027.•6.375% Senior Notes - The Company’s 6.375% Senior Notes due June 1, 2024, with interest payable each June 1 and December 1, which were issued on June 1, 2016. The proceeds were used to prepay a portion of the indebtedness outstanding under the Term Loan. At December 31, 2018,2019, $400 million aggregate principal amount is outstanding.
•5.00% Senior Notes - The Company’s 5.00% Senior Notes due December 15, 2027, with interest payable each June 15 and December 15, which were issued on December 4, 2017. The proceeds, along with cash on hand, were used to redeem the 6.75% Senior Notes and pay the related call premium. At December 31, 2018,2019, $450 million aggregate principal amount is outstanding.
•5.625% Senior Notes - The Company’s 5.625% Senior Notes due February 15, 2029, with interest payable each February 15 and August 15, commencing on August 15, 2019, which were issued on February 15, 2019. At December 31, 2019, $350 million aggregate principal amount is outstanding.
•4.125% Senior Notes - The Company’s 4.125% Senior Notes due August 1, 2030, with interest payable each February 1 and August 1, commencing on August 1, 2020, which were issued on February 11, 2020. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility, to pay expenses associated with the offering and, in the event the Separation is consummated, will be used to fund the Intercompany Loan to IAC. If the Separation is not consummated, the proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes.
Non-GAAP financial measure:
•Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”)- is a Non-GAAP financial measure. See “Principles of Financial Reporting” for the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of net earnings attributable to Match Group, Inc. shareholders to operating income and Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
EBITDA.MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
Match Group, Inc., through its portfolio companies, is a leading provider of dating products available in over 40 languages to our users all over the world through applications and websites we own and operate. We operate aglobally. Our portfolio of brands includingincludes Tinder®, Match®, Meetic®, OkCupid®, Hinge®, Pairs™, PlentyOfFish Meetic, OkCupid,®, and OurTime Pairs, and Hinge,®, as well as a number of other brands, each designed to increase our users’ likelihood of finding a meaningful connection. Through our portfolio ofcompanies and their trusted brands, we provide tailored products to meet the varying preferences of our users. Our products are available in over 40 languages to our users all over the world.
Sources of Revenue
All our products provide the use of certain features for free, and then offer a variety of additional features to Subscribers. Our revenue is primarily derived directly from users in the form of recurring subscription fees.
Subscription revenue is presented net of credits and credit card chargebacks. Subscribers pay in advance, primarily by using a credit card or through mobile app stores, and, subject to certain conditions identified in our terms and conditions, all purchases are final and nonrefundable. Fees collected, or contractually due, in advance for subscriptions are deferred and recognized as revenue using the straight-line method over the term of the applicable subscription period, which primarily ranges from one to six months, and corresponding mobile app store fees incurred on such transactions, if any, are deferred and expensed over the same period. We also earn revenue from online advertising, the purchase of à la carte features, and offline events. Online advertising revenue is recognized every time an ad is displayed. Revenue from the purchase of à la carte features is recognized based
on usage. Revenue and the related expenses associated with offline events are recognized when each event occurs.
Trends affecting our business
Over the last several years, we have seen significant changes in our business. Tinder has grown from incubation to the largest contributing brand in our portfolio and our other brands remainhave generally been stable in the aggregate. This in turn has allowed us to invest in or acquire brands such as Hinge and incubate new brands such as Chispa, BLK, and Ship, where we see significant potential future growth opportunities. With our evolving portfolio of brands, we have seen a number of significant trends in our business including the following:
Lower cost users. All of our brands rely on word-of-mouth, or free, customer acquisition to varying degrees. Word-of-mouth acquisition is typically a function of scale (with larger communities driving greater numbers of referrals), youthfulness (with the viral effect being more pronounced in younger populations due, in part, to a significantly higher concentration of single people in any given social circle and the increased adoption of social media and similar platforms among such populations), and monetization rate (with people generally more likely to talk openly about using online dating products that are less heavily monetized). Additionally, some, but not all, of our brands spend meaningfully on paid marketing. Accordingly, the average amount we spend to acquire a user differs significantly across brands based in large part on each brand’s mix of paid and free acquisition channels. As our mix has shifted toward younger users, our mix of acquisition channels has shifted toward free channels, driving a significant decline over the past several years in the average amount we spend to acquire a new user across our portfolio. As a percentage of revenue, our costs of acquiring Subscribers have declined. We expect the dynamics that have led to the growth in word-of-mouth user acquisition to continue going forward and for our brands to continue to acquire significant numbers of users through low-cost means.
Changing paid acquisition dynamics. Even as our acquisition of lower cost users increases, paid acquisition of users remains an important driver of our business. The channels through which we market our brands are always evolving, but we are currently in a period of rapid change as TV and video consumption patterns evolve and internet consumption occurs regularly on mobile devices. As we adapt our paid marketing activities to maximize user engagement with our brands, we may increase our use of paid advertising at brands where we traditionally relied on word-of-mouth engagement to leverage these shifts in media consumption patterns and fuel international growth. Other brands in our portfolio may reduce paid marketing activities to reflect the change in audience engagement.
Increasing In-App Purchase Fees. Purchases made by our customers through mobile applications, as opposed to desktop or mobile web, continue to increase. Purchases processed through the in-app payments systems provided by the Apple App Store and Google Play Store are subject to in-app purchase fees, which are generally 30% of the purchase price. As a result, the percentage of our revenues paid to Apple and Google continues to increase. In 2019, Tinder began offering subscribers an alternative payment method to Google’s in-app payment system similar to the payment alternatives other brands in our portfolio have historically offered to subscribers through mobile apps on Android. The availability of this alternative payment method has reduced the amount of in-app purchases fees paid to Google as a percentage of total Android revenue. To the extent that app stores fee change, or the mix of our revenue generated through app stores shifts, our results, in particular our profit measures, could be impacted.
Increase in acceptance and growth of dating products globally. Similar to Over the recentpast decade, there has been meaningful growth in dating product usage in North America and Western Europe, and we see the potential for similar growth in the rest of the world.world in the years ahead. As more internet-connected singles utilize online dating
products and the stigma around online dating continues to erode, we believe that there is potential for accelerating growth in the use of dating products globally.
Other factors affecting the comparability of our results
Advertising spend. Our advertising spend, which is included in our selling and marketing expense, has consistently been our largest operating expense. Generally,How we focusdeploy our advertising spend on display, mobile, television,varies among brands, with the majority of our advertising spend taking place online, including search engines, social media sites, streaming services and search channels. Weinfluencers. Additionally, some brands utilize television and out-of-home marketing campaigns, such as on outdoor billboards. For established brands, we seek to optimize for total return on advertising spend by frequently analyzing and adjusting this spend to focus on marketing channels and markets that generate a high return.returns above our thresholds. Our data-driven approach provides us the flexibility to scale and optimize our advertising spend. We spend marketingadvertising dollars against an expected lifetime value of a Subscriber that is realized by us over a multi-year period; and while this marketingadvertising spend is intended to be profitable on that basis, it is nearly always negative during the period in which the expense is incurred. Accordingly,For newer brands that are gaining scale, or existing brands that are expanding into new geographies, we may make incremental advertising investments to establish the brand before optimizing monetization of the brand. In general, our operating results, in particularmore established brands spend a higher proportion of their revenue on advertising while our profit measures, fornewer brands spend a particular period may be meaningfully impacted by the timing, size, number or effectivenesslower proportion and tend to rely more on word of our advertising campaigns in that period.mouth and other viral marketing. Additionally, advertising spend is typically higher during the first quarter of our fiscal year, and lower during the fourth quarter. See “Seasonality” below.
Seasonality. Historically, our business has experienced seasonal fluctuations in quarterly operating results, particularly with respect to our profit measurements. This is driven primarily by a higher concentration of advertising spend in the first quarter, when advertising prices are lowest and demand for our products is highest, and a lower concentration of advertising spend in the fourth quarter, when advertising costs are highest and demand for our products is lowest. Seasonality is not consistent across our brands, with brands targeted at older users generally showing more seasonality than brands targeted at younger users.
International markets. Our products are available across the world. Our international revenue represented 50%53% and 46%50% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. We vary our pricing to align with local market conditions and our international businesses typically earn revenue in local currencies. As foreign currency exchange rates change, translation of the statement of operations of our international businesses into U.S. dollars affects year-over-year comparability of operating results.
20182019 Developments
On December 7, 2018,February 15, 2019, we amendedissued $350 million aggregate principal amount of the Company’s credit agreement5.625% Senior Notes. The proceeds from the issuance of the 5.625% Senior Notes were used to extend the maturity date ofrepay outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility, to December 7, 2023pay expenses associated with the offering, and modify the leverage ratio levels in the pricing grid used to calculate the applicable interest rate under the Credit Facility.for general corporate purposes.
On December 19, 2018, we paid a special dividend of $2.00 per share on2019, Match Group common stock and Class B common stock,IAC entered into the Transaction Agreement, pursuant to which, following the satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including IAC and Match Group stockholder approval, the businesses of Match Group will be separated from the remaining businesses of IAC through Transactions that will result in two, separate public companies—(1) IAC, which will be re-named “Match Group, Inc.” and which will own the businesses of Match Group and certain IAC financing subsidiaries, and (2) IAC Holdings, Inc., which will be re-named “IAC/InterActiveCorp” and which will own IAC’s other businesses—and the pre-transaction stockholders of record asMatch Group (other than IAC) and of IAC owning shares in New Match. For additional information relating to the close of business on December 5, 2018, inSeparation and the aggregate amount equal to $556.4 million, which was fundedrelated transactions and agreements, see “Part I—Item 1—Business—Relationship with cash on hand and borrowings under the Credit Facility.IAC—Separation.”
20182019 Consolidated Results
In 2018,2019, revenue, operating income and Adjusted EBITDA grew 30%19%, 53%17% and 39%19%, respectively. Revenue growth was primarily due to strong growth at Tinder and additional contributions from certain other brands. The growth in operating income and Adjusted EBITDA was due to higher revenue and lower selling and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue due to the continued product mix shift toward brands with lower marketing spend as a percentage of revenue, partially offset by an increase in cost of revenue expense primarily due to higher in-app purchase fees as a result of growing revenue fromsourced through mobile app stores.stores, and higher legal costs. Operating income was further impacted by the impairment of the Match brand in the UK and higher stock-based compensation expense as a percentage of revenue, resulting in decreased growth compared to Adjusted EBITDA.
Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 |
| (Amounts in thousands, except ARPU) |
Direct Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | $ | 902,478 |
| | $ | 161,144 |
| | 22% | | $ | 741,334 |
| | $ | 67,390 |
| | 10% | | $ | 673,944 |
|
International | 774,693 |
| | 234,778 |
| | 43% | | 539,915 |
| | 146,495 |
| | 37% | | 393,420 |
|
Total Direct Revenue | 1,677,171 |
| | 395,922 |
| | 31% | | 1,281,249 |
| | 213,885 |
| | 20% | | 1,067,364 |
|
Indirect Revenue | 52,679 |
| | 3,267 |
| | 7% | | 49,412 |
| | (1,334 | ) | | (3)% | | 50,746 |
|
Total Revenue | $ | 1,729,850 |
| | $ | 399,189 |
| | 30% | | $ | 1,330,661 |
| | $ | 212,551 |
| | 19% | | $ | 1,118,110 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tinder | $ | 805,316 |
| | $ | 402,100 |
| | 100% | | $ | 403,216 |
| | $ | 234,694 |
| | 139% | | $ | 168,522 |
|
Other brands | 871,855 |
| | (6,178 | ) | | (1)% | | 878,033 |
| | (20,809 | ) | | (2)% | | 898,842 |
|
Total Direct Revenue | $ | 1,677,171 |
| | $ | 395,922 |
| | 31% | | $ | 1,281,249 |
| | $ | 213,885 |
| | 20% | | $ | 1,067,364 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Percentage of Total Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | 52% | | | | | | 56% | | | | | | 60% |
International | 45% | | | | | | 40% | | | | | | 35% |
Total Direct Revenue | 97% | | | | | | 96% | | | | | | 95% |
Indirect Revenue | 3% | | | | | | 4% | | | | | | 5% |
Total Revenue | 100% | | | | | | 100% | | | | | | 100% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Subscribers: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | 4,161 |
| | 592 |
| | 17% | | 3,569 |
| | 301 |
| | 9% | | 3,268 |
|
International | 3,712 |
| | 873 |
| | 31% | | 2,839 |
| | 699 |
| | 33% | | 2,140 |
|
Total | 7,873 |
| | 1,465 |
| | 23% | | 6,408 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 18% | | 5,408 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Change calculated using non-rounded numbers) |
ARPU: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | $ | 0.59 |
| | | | 4% | | $ | 0.56 |
| | | | —% | | $ | 0.56 |
|
International | $ | 0.56 |
| | | | 10% | | $ | 0.51 |
| | | | 3% | | $ | 0.50 |
|
Total | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | 6% | | $ | 0.54 |
| | $ | — |
| | 1% | | $ | 0.54 |
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” For a discussion regarding our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, please refer to Part II, Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2019.
Revenue
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in thousands, except ARPU) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | $ | 1,024,161 | | | $ | 121,683 | | | 13% | | | $ | 902,478 | | | $ | 161,144 | | | 22% | | | $ | 741,334 | |
International | 983,013 | | | 208,320 | | | 27% | | | 774,693 | | | 234,778 | | | 43% | | | 539,915 | |
Total Direct Revenue | 2,007,174 | | | 330,003 | | | 20% | | | 1,677,171 | | | 395,922 | | | 31% | | | 1,281,249 | |
Indirect Revenue | 44,084 | | | (8,595) | | | (16)% | | | 52,679 | | | 3,267 | | | 7% | | | 49,412 | |
Total Revenue | $ | 2,051,258 | | | $ | 321,408 | | | 19% | | | $ | 1,729,850 | | | $ | 399,189 | | | 30% | | | $ | 1,330,661 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tinder | $ | 1,152,045 | | | $ | 346,729 | | | 43% | | | $ | 805,316 | | | $ | 402,100 | | | 100% | | | $ | 403,216 | |
Other brands | 855,129 | | | (16,726) | | | (2)% | | | 871,855 | | | (6,178) | | | (1)% | | | 878,033 | |
Total Direct Revenue | $ | 2,007,174 | | | $ | 330,003 | | | 20% | | | $ | 1,677,171 | | | $ | 395,922 | | | 31% | | | $ | 1,281,249 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Percentage of Total Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Direct Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | 50% | | | | | | | 52% | | | | | | | 56% | |
International | 48% | | | | | | | 45% | | | | | | | 40% | |
Total Direct Revenue | 98% | | | | | | | 97% | | | | | | | 96% | |
Indirect Revenue | 2% | | | | | | | 3% | | | | | | | 4% | |
Total Revenue | 100% | | | | | | | 100% | | | | | | | 100% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average Subscribers: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | 4,554 | | | 393 | | | 9% | | | 4,161 | | | 592 | | | 17% | | | 3,569 | |
International | 4,729 | | | 1,017 | | | 27% | | | 3,712 | | | 873 | | | 31% | | | 2,839 | |
Total | 9,283 | | | 1,410 | | | 18% | | | 7,873 | | | 1,465 | | | 23% | | | 6,408 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Change calculated using non-rounded numbers) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ARPU: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | $ | 0.61 | | | | | 4% | | | $ | 0.59 | | | | | 4% | | | $ | 0.56 | |
International | $ | 0.56 | | | | | —% | | | $ | 0.56 | | | | | 10% | | | $ | 0.51 | |
Total | $ | 0.58 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | 2% | | | $ | 0.57 | | | $ | 0.03 | | | 6% | | | $ | 0.54 | |
For the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018
International Direct Revenue grew $234.8$208.3 million, or 43%27%, in 20182019 versus 2017,2018, driven by 31%27% growth in Average Subscribers, and a 10% increase in ARPU.Subscribers. North America Direct Revenue grew $161.1$121.7 million, or 22%13%, in 20182019 versus 2017,2018, driven by 17%9% growth in Average Subscribers, and a 4% increase in ARPU.
Growth in International and North America Average Subscribers was primarily driven by Tinder. Hinge and Pairs also contributed to subscriber growth in North America and International, andrespectively. North America ARPU increased primarily due to increases in ARPU at Tinder as Subscribers purchased premium subscriptions, such as Tinder Gold, as well as additional à la carte features. International ARPU was unfavorably impacted by the strength of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro, British pound (“GBP”), and certain other currencies.
Indirect Revenue increased $3.3decreased $8.6 million primarily due to increased advertising revenue at Tinder, partially offset by lower impressions at brands excluding Tinder.and a lower price per impression received from an advertising network provider.
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of revenue | $527,184 | | | $117,184 | | | 29% | | | $410,000 | | | $130,501 | | | 47% | | | $279,499 | |
Percentage of revenue | 26% | | | | | | | 24% | | | | | | | 21% | |
For the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016
North America Direct Revenue grew $67.4 million, or 10%, in 2017 versus 2016, driven by 9% growth in Average Subscribers. International Direct Revenue grew $146.5 million, or 37%, in 2017 versus 2016, driven by 33% growth in Average Subscribers and a 3% increase in ARPU.
Growth in North America Average Subscribers was primarily due to Tinder, partially offset by declines at our Match Affinity brands as marketing spend was reduced to better align with the expected lifetime value of a Subscriber. North America ARPU was flat as the continuing mix shift towards lower ARPU brands with lower price points compared to most of our other brands, was offset by increases in ARPU at Tinder and PlentyOfFish, as these brands are offering premium and multi-tiered subscriptions, such as Tinder Gold.
Growth in International Average Subscribers was primarily due to Tinder and additional contributions from Pairs. Growth in International ARPU was primarily due to rate increases at Tinder and Meetic, partially offset by the continued mix shift towards lower ARPU brands.
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Cost of revenue | $410,000 | | $130,501 | | 47% | | $279,499 | | $83,851 | | 43% | | $195,648 |
Percentage of revenue | 24% | | | | | | 21% | | | | | | 17% |
For the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017
Cost of revenue increased due primarily to an increase in in-app purchase fees of $123.8 million as our revenues are increasingly sourced through mobile app stores.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016
Cost of revenue increased, outpacing revenue growth, primarily due to an increase in in-app purchase fees of $75.4$80.1 million, andas revenue continues to be increasingly sourced through mobile app stores; an increase in hosting fees of $5.9$21.9 million; and an increase in compensation expense of $11.2 million both as a result of growth at Tinder.related to increased headcount and other operating costs in customer care.
Selling and marketing expense
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in thousands) | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Selling and marketing expense | $419,954 | | $44,344 | | 12% | | $375,610 | | $26,491 | | 8% | | $349,119 | Selling and marketing expense | $427,440 | | | $7,486 | | | 2% | | | $419,954 | | | $44,344 | | | 12% | | | $375,610 | |
Percentage of revenue | 24% | | 28% | | 31% | Percentage of revenue | 21% | | | 24% | | | 28% | |
For the year ended December 31, 20182019 compared to the year ended December 31, 20172018
Selling and marketing expense increased primarily due to increases in total butspending at Tinder, Hinge, and Pairs, partially offset by decreases at Meetic, Match, and PlentyOfFish. Selling and marketing expense declined as a percentage of revenue. The increase in sellingrevenue as we continue to generate revenue growth from brands with relatively lower marketing expense.
General and marketingadministrative expense is primarily due to $45.6 million of increased marketing expense as a result of marketing initiatives at Tinder, Pairs, PlentyOfFish, OkCupid, and Meetic and the acquisition of Hinge, partially offset by lower offline marketing spend at Match and Match Affinity brands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative expense | $254,966 | | | $74,680 | | | 41% | | | $180,286 | | | $482 | | | —% | | | $179,804 | |
Percentage of revenue | 12% | | | | | | | 10% | | | | | | | 14% | |
For the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to the year ended December 31, 20162018
SellingGeneral and marketingadministrative expense increased with the growth in the business but continued to decline as a percentage of revenue. The increase in total selling and marketing expense is primarily due to an increase of $15.3$38.1 million in marketing spend primarily at Tinder related to strategic investmentslegal fees; an increase in certain international markets and increased marketing related to the launchcompensation of a new brand in Europe, partially offset by a reduction in marketing spend at our Match Affinity brands. Additionally, compensation increased $9.1$19.0 million primarily related to increased headcount at Tinder and the employer portion of payroll taxes paid upon the exercise of Match Group options. The decline as a percentage of revenue isstock-based compensation expense due to a continued shift towards brands with lower marketing spend as a percentagenew equity awards made since the prior year period, modification charges during 2019, and an increase in headcount; and an increase of revenue and reductions in marketing spend at our Match Affinity brands.$4.7 million for non-income taxes that includes the recently enacted French Digital Services Tax, which was made effective retroactively to January 1, 2019.
General and administrativeProduct development expense
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in thousands) | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
General and administrative expense | $180,286 | | $482 | | —% | | $179,804 | | $44,785 | | 33% | | $135,019 | |
Product development expense | | Product development expense | $151,960 | | | $19,930 | | | 15% | | | $132,030 | | | $30,880 | | | 31% | | | $101,150 | |
Percentage of revenue | 10% | | 14% | | 12% | Percentage of revenue | 7% | | | 8% | | | 8% | |
For the year ended December 31, 20182019 compared to the year ended December 31, 20172018
General and administrativeProduct development expense increased driven primarily byas a result of an increase of $6.9$18.6 million in compensation, expense, excludingincluding an increase of $10.3 million in stock-based compensation expense primarily due to an increase inthe vesting of certain awards for which the market condition was met, and increased headcount an increase in professional fees of $3.7 million primarily related to increased litigation costs, and an increase in other miscellaneous expenses of $5.9 million. Partially offsetting these increases is a decrease of $10.5 million in stock-based compensation expense due primarily to a decrease in expense related to a subsidiary denominated equity award issued to a non-employee (which was settled in 2017) and a decrease in acquisition-related contingent consideration expense of $4.9 million.at Tinder.
Depreciation
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | $32,450 | | | $(518) | | | (2)% | | | $32,968 | | | $355 | | | 1% | | | $32,613 | |
Percentage of revenue | 2% | | | | | | | 2% | | | | | | | 2% | |
For the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to the year ended December 31, 20162018
General and administrative expense increased, drivenDepreciation decreased primarily by an increase of $20.6 million in compensation, an increase of $14.5 million in acquisition-related contingent consideration fair value adjustments (expense of $5.3 million in 2017 versus income of $9.2 million in 2016) and an increase of $6.8 million in professional fees in 2017 primarily related to the settlement of the Tinder equity plan. The increase in compensation expense is due to a $9.1 million increase in stock-based compensation expense primarily related to a subsidiary denominated equity award held by a non-employee, which was settled in the third quarter of 2017, the employer portion of payroll taxes paid upon the exercise of Match Group options and an increase in headcount from business growth.
Product development expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Product development expense | $132,030 | | $30,880 | | 31% | | $101,150 | | $23,033 | | 29% | | $78,117 |
Percentage of revenue | 8% | | | | | | 8% | | | | | | 7% |
For the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017
Product development expense increased, driven primarily by an increase of $28.8 million in compensation expense primarily related to higher headcount at Tinder.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016
Product development expense increased, driven primarily by an increase of $20.7 million in compensation expense, of which $14.4 million relates primarily to 1) higher headcount and 2) the employer portion of payroll taxes paid upon the exercise of Match Group options and $6.3 million of stock-based compensation expense due primarily to new grants issued since 2016.
Depreciation
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Depreciation | $32,968 | | $355 | | 1% | | $32,613 | | $4,887 | | 18% | | $27,726 |
Percentage of revenue | 2% | | | | | | 2% | | | | | | 2% |
For the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017
Depreciation was relatively flat during the period increasing $0.4 million, or 1%.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016
Depreciation increased $4.9 million, or 18%, driven by an increase in computer hardware,certain internally developed software andbecoming fully depreciated, partially offset by increased depreciation related to leasehold improvements.
Operating Income and Adjusted EBITDA
| | | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| Years Ended December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| (Dollars in thousands) | |
Operating income | $553,294 | | $192,777 | | 53% | | $360,517 | | $44,968 | | 14% | | $315,549 | Operating income | $648,531 | | | $95,237 | | | 17% | | | $553,294 | | | $192,777 | | | 53% | | | $360,517 | |
| Percentage of revenue | 32% | | 27% | | 28% | Percentage of revenue | 32% | | | 32% | | | 27% | |
| | |
Adjusted EBITDA | $653,931 | | $184,990 | | 39% | | $468,941 | | $65,561 | | 16% | | $403,380 | Adjusted EBITDA | $779,432 | | | $125,501 | | | 19% | | | $653,931 | | | $184,990 | | | 39% | | | $468,941 | |
| Percentage of revenue | 38% | | 35% | | 36% | Percentage of revenue | 38% | | | 38% | | | 35% | |
For a reconciliation of net earnings attributable to Match Group, Inc. shareholders to operating income and Adjusted EBITDA, see “Principles of Financial Reporting.”
For the year ended December 31, 20182019 compared to the year ended December 31, 20172018
Operating income and Adjusted EBITDA increased $192.8$95.2 million, or 53%17%, and $185.0$125.5 million, or 39%19%, respectively, primarily as a result of the increase in revenue of $399.2$321.4 million and lower selling and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue due to the ongoing product mix shift toward brands with lower marketing spend as a percentage of revenue, and a reduction in marketing spend at our Match Affinity brands, partially offset by an increase in cost of revenue primarily due to higher in-app purchase fees and an increase in legal fees. Operating income was furtheralso impacted by lowerhigher stock-based compensation expense as a percentage of revenue and an increase in amortization due to the impairment of the Match brand in the UK, resulting in increaseddecreased growth compared to Adjusted EBITDA.
At December 31, 2018,2019, there was $119.3$114.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to all equity-based awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.4 years.
Interest expense
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | $91,719 | | | $18,302 | | | 25% | | | $73,417 | | | $(4,148) | | | (5)% | | | $77,565 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the year ended December 31, 20172019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016
Operating income and Adjusted EBITDA increased $45.0 million, or 14%, and $65.6 million, or 16%, respectively, primarily as a result of the increase in revenue of $212.6 million and lower selling and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue due to the ongoing product mix shift toward brands with lower marketing spend as a percentage of revenue and a reduction in marketing spend at our Match Affinity brands, partially offset by an increase in cost of revenue primarily due to higher in-app purchase fees. Operating income was further impacted by an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $16.7 million, an increase in acquisition-related contingent consideration fair value adjustments of $14.5 million, and an increase in depreciation of $4.9 million due to growth in our business, partially offset by a $15.5 million decrease in amortization of intangibles as a significant portion of our scheduled amortization from the acquisition of PlentyOfFish concluded at the end of 2016.
Interest expense
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Interest expense | $73,417 | | $(4,148) | | (5)% | | $77,565 | | $(4,634) | | (6)% | | $82,199 |
For the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017
Interest expense decreasedincreased primarily due to the issuance of the 5.00%5.625% Senior Notes which replacedin February 2019. Additionally, the 6.75% Senior Notes, partially offset by an increase in the weighted average interest rate of the Term Loan and an increase in the outstanding balance of the Term Loan beginning with the third quarter of 2017.
For the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016
Interest expense decreased primarily due to the reduction of the average outstanding balance in the Term Loan and the December 2016 and August 2017 repricings ofon the Term Loan, which reducedis based on LIBOR, was higher in the contractual interest rates, partially offset by the issuance of the 6.375% Senior Notes in June 2016, which replaced a corresponding amount outstanding on the Term Loan with debt at a higher interest rate.current year period.
Other (expense) income, (expense), net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Other income (expense), net | $7,765 | | $38,592 | | NM | | $(30,827) | | $(38,693) | | NM | | $7,866 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other (expense) income, net | $(2,026) | | | $(9,791) | | | NM | | | $7,765 | | | $38,592 | | | NM | | | $(30,827) | |
________________________
NM = not meaningful
Other expense, net, in 2019 includes a $4.0 million impairment of an equity investment, expense of $1.7 million related to a mark-to-market adjustment pertaining to a liability classified equity instrument, and $0.9 million in net foreign currency losses in the period, partially offset by interest income of $4.4 million.
Other income, net, in 2018 includes $5.3 million in net foreign currency exchange gains due primarily to a strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the British PoundGBP in the period and $4.9 million of interest income, partially offset by $2.1 million of impairments of certain equity investments of $2.1 million and $0.7 million of expense related to a mark-to-market adjustment pertaining to a subsidiary denominated equity instrument.
Other expense, net, in 2017 includes expenses of $15.4 million related to the extinguishment of our 6.75% Senior Notes and repricing of the Term Loan, $13.0 million related to a mark-to-market adjustment pertaining to a subsidiary denominated equity award held by a non-employee, $10.3 million in net foreign currency exchange losses primarily due to the strengthening of the British Pound relative to the dollar, and a $2.3 million other-than-temporary impairment charge related to a cost method investment resulting from our assessment of the near-term prospects and financial condition of the investee. These expenses were partially offset by a gain on the sale of a cost method investment of $9.1 million.
Other income, net in 2016 includes $20.0 million in foreign currency exchange gains due to strengthening of the dollar relative to the British Pound and Euro and a $3.1 million gain related to the sale of a marketable equity security, partially offset by a non-cash charge of $12.1 million related to the write-off of a proportionate share of original issue discount and deferred financing costs associated with prepayments of $440 million of the Term Loan, $2.1 million of expense related to mark-to-market adjustment pertaining to a subsidiary denominated equity award held by a non-employee, $1.5 million repricing fees related to the Term Loan, and a $0.7 million other-than-temporary impairment charge related to a certain cost method investment.
Income tax (provision) benefit
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Years Ended December 31, | |
| Years Ended December 31, | | 2019 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 |
| 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2017 | | $ Change | | % Change | | 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in thousands) | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Income tax (provision) benefit | $(14,673) | | $(118,525) | | NM | | $103,852 | | $166,727 | | NM | | $(62,875) | Income tax (provision) benefit | $(20,361) | | | $(5,688) | | | 39% | | | $(14,673) | | | $(118,525) | | | NM | | | $103,852 | |
Effective income tax rate | 3% | | NM | | 26% | Effective income tax rate | 4% | | | 3% | | | NM | |
For discussion of income taxes, see “Note 3—Income Taxes” to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8—Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The following table reconciles net earnings attributable to Match Group, Inc. shareholders to operating income and Adjusted EBITDA:
Other than the items described above, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2018.2019.
The following disclosure is provided to supplement the descriptions of Match Group’s accounting policies contained in “Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8—Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in regard to significant areas of judgment. Management of the Company is required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions during the preparation of its consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.principles (“GAAP”). These estimates, judgments and assumptions impact the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Because of the size of the financial statement elements to which they relate, some of our accounting policies and estimates have a more significant impact on our consolidated financial statements than others. What follows is a discussion of some of our more significant accounting policies and estimates.
Acquisitions have been, and will continue to be, an important part of the Company’s growth strategy. The purchase price of each acquisition is attributed to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the date of acquisition, including identifiable intangible assets that either arise from a contractual or legal right or are separable from goodwill. The fair value of these intangible assets is based on valuations that use information and assumptions provided by management. The excess purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets is recorded as goodwill and is assigned to the reporting unit that is expected to benefit from the combination as of the acquisition date.
Goodwill is the Company’s largest asset with a carrying value of $1.2 billion at both December 31, 2019 and 2018, representing 51% and 2017, representing 61% and 59%, respectively, of the Company’s total assets. Indefinite-lived intangible assets, which consist of the Company’s acquired trade names and trademarks, have a carrying value of $230.7$221.2 million and $228.3$230.7 million at December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed annually for impairment as of October 1, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit or the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset below its carrying value.
estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment loss equal to the excess is recorded. The 2019 and 2018 annual assessments did not identify any impairments.
While the Company has the option to qualitatively assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair valuevalues of its indefinite-lived intangible assets isare less than their carrying values, the Company’s policy is to determine the fair value of each of its indefinite-lived intangible assets annually as of October 1.1, in part, because the level of effort required to perform the quantitative and qualitative assessments is essentially equivalent. The Company determines the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets using an avoided royalty DCF valuation analysis. Significant judgments inherent in these analysesthis analysis include the selection of appropriate royalty and discount rates and estimating the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses are intended to reflect the risks inherent in the expected future cash flows generated by the respective intangible assets. The royalty rates used in the DCF analyses are based upon an estimate of the royalty rates that a market participant would pay to license the Company’s trade names and trademarks. The future cash flows are based on the Company’s most recent forecast and budget and, for years beyond the budget, the Company’s estimates, which are based, in part, on forecasted growth rates. Assumptions used in the avoided royalty DCF analyses, including the discount rate and royalty rate, are assessed annually based on the actual and projected cash flows related to the asset, as well as macroeconomic and industry specific factors. The discount rates used in the Company’s annual indefinite-lived impairment assessment ranged from 11% to 26% in both 20182019 and 2017,2018, and the royalty rates used ranged from 3% to 8% in both 2019 and 2018.
We review the carrying value of all long-lived assets, comprising property and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If the carrying value is deemed not to be recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. In addition, the Company reviews the useful lives of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that these lives may be changed. The carrying value of property and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets is $65.3$73.1 million and $63.7$65.3 million, at December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively.
Match Group is included within IAC’s tax group for purposes of federal and consolidated state income tax return filings. In all periods presented, current income tax provision and deferred income tax benefit have been computed for Match Group on an as if stand-alone, separate return basis. The Company’s payments to IAC for its share of IAC’s consolidated federal and state tax return liabilities have been reflected within cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows. The tax sharing agreement between the Company and IAC governs the parties’ respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to tax matters, including responsibility for taxes attributable to the Company, entitlement to refunds, allocation of tax attributes and other matters.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, and deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying values of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided on deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. At December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018 the balance of the Company��sCompany’s net deferred tax asset is $122.4 million and $114.2 million, and $94.7 million, respectively.
We evaluate and account for uncertain tax positions using a two-step approach. Recognition (step one) occurs when we conclude that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. De-recognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when the Company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. This measurement step is inherently difficult and requires subjective estimations of such amounts to determine the
probability of various possible outcomes. At December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, the Company has unrecognized tax benefits of $37.6$55.5 million and $26.8$37.6 million, including interest and penalties, respectively. We consider many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustment, and which may not accurately anticipate actual outcomes. Although management currently believes changes to reserves from period to period and differences between amounts paid, if any, upon resolution of issues raised in audits and amounts previously provided will not have a material impact on the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of the Company, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future.
The ultimate amount of deferred income tax assets realized and the amounts paid for deferred income tax liabilities and uncertain tax positions may vary from our estimates due to future changes in income tax law, state income tax apportionment or the outcome of any review of our tax returns by the various tax authorities, as well as actual operating results of the Company that vary significantly from anticipated results.
For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see “Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8—Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company’s long-term debt.
The Company conducts business in certain foreign markets, primarily in various jurisdictions within the European Union (“EU”) and Asia. We are primarily exposed to foreign exchange risk for both the Euro and British Pound (“GBP”).
Foreign currency exchange gains and losses included in the Company’s earnings for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 are (losses) and 2016 are gains and (losses) of $(0.9) million, $5.3 million and $(10.3) million, and $20.0 million, respectively. Historically, foreign currency exchange gains and losses have not been material to the Company. The loss in 2017 is primarily related to a U.S. dollar denominated intercompany loan in which the receivable is held by a foreign subsidiary with a GBP functional currency. As the GBP strengthened against the U.S. Dollar during the year, the intercompany loan incurred losses. The gain in 2016 is primarily related to the significant decline in the GBP in 2016 following the Brexit vote on June 23, 2016.
Foreign currency exchange gains or losses historically have not been material to the Company. As a result, historically, we have not historically, hedged any foreign currency exposures. The continued growth and expansion of our international operations into new countries increases our exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Significant foreign exchange rate fluctuations, in the case of one currency or collectively with other currencies, could adversely affect our future results of operations.
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Match Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Match Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2019, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 28, 201927, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Adoption of ASU No. 2016-092016-02
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.
MATCH GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES