UNITED STATES

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORMForm 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

☒   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018

OR

☐   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year-ended December 31, 2017transition period from _______ to ________

 

Commission file number 000-30234number: 001-36492

 

 AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada88-0422242
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
4040 Broadway117 South 4th Street, Neodesha, Kansas
Suite 425��
San Antonio, Texas7820966757
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(210) 451-5545
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(316) 202-2076

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

 

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.001 par valueNew York Stock Exchange LLC
  

10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual PreferredCommon Stock, $0.001 par value

$0.001 per share
NoneNYSE American LLC

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  ☐  YesNo  ☒   No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes  ☐  YesNo  ☒   No

 

Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ☒  No  ☐

 

☒   Yes           ☐   No

Table of Contents

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  ☒  YesNo  ☐   No

 

Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, , in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large“large accelerated filer,accelerated“accelerated filer,“emerging growth company” and smaller“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth companycompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ☐Accelerated filer   ☐
Non-accelerated filer  ☐

Large accelerated filer  ☐  Accelerated filer  ☐  Non-accelerated filer  ☐  Emerging growth company  ☐  Smaller reporting company  ☒

Emerging growth  ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ☐  No  ☒  

 

☐   Yes           ☒   No

State theThe aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: approximately $2.0 million.quarter was $7,805,401.

 

Indicate the number Asof shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 23,589,790March 27, 2019, there were 14,382,763 shares of common stock, $0.001Common Stock, par value outstanding on March 15, 2018.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE$0.001 per share, issued and outstanding.

 

NONE.

Table of Contents

 

ENERJEX RESOURCES,AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

PART I Page4
PART IITEM 1.BUSINESS54
ITEM 1BUSINESS5
ITEM 2PROPERTIES32
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS1711
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS19
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES20
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS20
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES20
PART II 3221
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS32
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE32
PART II33
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES3321
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA3421
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS3422
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK4128
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA4128
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE4128
ITEM 9A9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES29
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION29
PART III 4130
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION42
PART III43
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE4330
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION4334
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS4339
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE4344
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES45
PART IV 4346
PART IV44
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTSTATEMENTS, SCHEDULES46
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS44F-1

 


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

PART I

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this document that are not purely historical arereport may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statementsPrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are statements regarding future events, our future financial performance, and include statements regarding projected operating results. Thesecautioned that such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations,our management’s beliefs intentions, strategies, forecasts and assumptions and on information currently available to our management and involve a number of risks and uncertaintiesuncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions, which are subject to change at any time at our discretion. Forward-looking statements include our assessment, from time to time of our competitive position, the industry environment, potential growth opportunities and the effects of regulation. Forward-looking statements include all statements that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipatedare not historical facts and can be identified by these forward-looking statements. We have attempted to identify forward-looking statements by terminology includingterms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “hopes,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts”“predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would” or “should” or the negative of these terms orsimilar expressions.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other comparable terminology. Although we do not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all risk factors nor can we address the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differbe materially different from those contained in any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. AllWe discuss many of these risks in greater detail in “Risk Factors.” Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us onrepresent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits to the report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any suchthese forward-looking statements except as may otherwise be required by law.

Ourpublicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

Overview

AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (“AgEagle,” “the Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) was created to pioneer, innovate and advance aerial imaging data collection and analytics technologies capable of addressing the impending food and environmental sustainability crises that threaten our planet. Our daily efforts are focused on delivering the metrics, tools and strategies necessary to define and implement intelligent sustainability and precision farming solutions that solve important problems confronting the agricultural industry. Since our founding in 2010, we have been intent on becoming a trusted partner to major food manufacturers and precision growers seeking to adopt and support productive agricultural approaches to better farming practices which limit the impact on our natural resources, reduce reliance on inputs and materially increase crop yields and profits.

Our Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Business

We design, produce, distribute and support technologically-advanced small unmanned aerial systems (UAVs or drones) that we offer for sale commercially to the precision agriculture industry. Additionally, we recently announced a new service offering using our leased UAVs and associated data processing services for the sustainable agriculture industry.

Our first commercially available product was the AgEagle Classic which was followed shortly thereafter by the RAPID System. As we improved and matured our product, we launched the RX-60 and subsequently our current product, the RX-48. The success we have achieved with our legacy products, which we believe has carried over into the continued improvement of the RX-60 and RX-48, stems from our ability to invent and deliver advanced solutions utilizing our proprietary technologies and trade secrets that help farmers, agronomists and other precision agricultural professionals operate more effectively and efficiently. Our core technological capabilities, developed over five years of research and innovation, include a lightweight laminated shell that allows the UAV platform to perform under challenging flying conditions, a camera with a Near Infrared (NIR) filter, a rugged foot launcher (RX-60), and high-end software that automates drone flights and provides geo-referenced data.

Table of Contents

Our UAV is an advanced fixed wing drone. Its design is based upon the years of experience our management has with aircraft and composite parts construction. All of our UAVs are electrically powered, weigh approximately six pounds fully loaded, are capable of flying over approximately 400 acres (roughly 60 minutes of airtime) per flight from their launch location, and are configured to carry a camera with our NIR filter that uses near infrared images to capture crop data. We believe that these characteristics make our UAVs well suited for providing a complete aerial view of a farmer’s field to help precisely identify crop health and field conditions faster than any other method available.

Our UAVs were initially specifically designed to help farmers increase profits by pinpointing areas where nutrients or chemicals need to be applied, as opposed to traditional widespread land application processes, thus decreasing input costs, reducing the amount of chemicals applied and potentially increasing yields. Our products were designed for busy agriculture professionals who do not have the time to process images on their computers, which some of our competitors require. The software can automatically take pictures from the camera, stitch the photos together through the cloud, and deliver a geo-referenced, high quality aerial map to the user’s desktop or tablet device using specialty precision agriculture software such as SST Software, SMS Software or most other agricultural software solutions. The result is a prescription or zone map that can then be used in a field computer that is typically found in a sprayer or applicator designed to drive through fields to precisely apply the amount of nutrients or chemicals required to continue or restore the production of healthy crops.

In addition to UAV sales, in late 2018, we introduced a new drone-leasing program, alleviating farmers and agribusinesses from significant upfront costs associated with purchasing a drone, while also relieving them from ongoing drone maintenance and support requirements. Additionally, the new program provides the option of engaging a trained AgEagle pilot to operate the drone and manage the entire image collection process, creating a truly turnkey aerial imagery capture solution for our customers.

Research and development activities are integral to our business and we follow a disciplined approach to investing our resources to create new technologies and solutions.

Acquisition of Agribotix

On August 28, 2018, we closed the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) dated July 25, 2018 with AgEagle Aerial, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company; Agribotix, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Agribotix” or the “Seller”); and the other parties named therein. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we acquired all right, title and interest in and to all assets owned by Agribotix and utilized in their business of providing integrated agricultural drone solutions and drone-enabled software technologies and services for precision agriculture, except for certain factors, including thoseexcluded assets as set forth in the “Risk Factors” section in Part I, Item 1APurchase Agreement. At closing, we also assumed certain commitments under various third-party contracts pursuant to the terms of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere in this document. The factors impacting these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:the Purchase Agreement.

 

inability to attract and obtain additional development capital;
inability to achieve sufficient future sales levels or other operating results;
inability to efficiently manage our operations;
effect of our hedging strategies on our results of operations;
potential default under our secured obligations or material debt agreements;
estimated quantities and quality of oil and gas reserves;
declining local, national and worldwide economic conditions;
fluctuations in the price of oil and natural gas;
continued weather conditions that impact our abilities to efficiently manage our drilling and development activities;
the inability of management to effectively implement our strategies and business plans;
approval of certain parts of our operations by state regulators;
inability to hire or retain sufficient qualified operating field personnel;
increases in interest rates or our cost of borrowing;
deterioration in general or regional (Colorado, Western Nebraska, Eastern Kansas and South Texas) economic conditions;
adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs of compliance, or adverse findings by a regulator with respect to existing operations;
the occurrence of natural disasters, unforeseen weather conditions, or other events or circumstances that could impact our operations or could impact the operations of companies or contractors we depend upon in our operations;
inability to acquire mineral leases at a favorable economic value that will allow us to expand our development efforts; and
changes in U.S. GAAP or in the legal, regulatory and legislative environments in the markets in which we operate.

We believe that purchasing Agribotix’s primary product,FarmLens™, will benefit us and our shareholders by developing important vertically integrated products and services.FarmLens is a subscription cloud analytics service that processes data, primarily collected with a drone such as ours, and makes such data actionable by farmers and agronomists.FarmLens is currently sold by us as a subscription service and offered either standalone or in a bundle with drone platforms manufactured by leading drone providers like AgEagle, DJI and senseFly.

 

All references in this reportTheFarmLens platform extends our reach as a business through key partnerships with, and direct integration into offerings by leading agricultural companies, including John Deere and The Climate Corporation, a subsidiary of Bayer. In October 2018, AgEagle announced that we were expanding on Agribotix’s existing partnership with The Climate Corporation’sFieldView™platform, enabling farmers to “we,” “us,” “our,” “company”share images fromFarmLens to theirFieldView accounts and “EnerJex” refer to EnerJex Resources, Inc.compare them alongside other valuable metrics, including planting and our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Working Interest, LLC,yield data. To date, Agribotix has processed agricultural imagery for approximately 1.3 million acres of crops and Black Raven Energy, Inc., unlessanalyzed data for over 50 different crop types from over 50 countries around the context requires otherwise. We report our financial information on the basis of a December 31st fiscal year end. We have provided definitions for the oil and gas industry terms used in this report in the “Glossary” beginning on page 14 of this report.world.

 

UnlessIn December 2018, we unveiled our plans to develop aFarmLens Mobile app, extending the context otherwise requiresnumerous benefits of theFarmLensplatform to mobile devices. TheFarmLens Mobile app will be commercially launched toward the end of the second quarter 2019 and available for download on any iPhone, iPad or Android device.

Table of Contents

Our Sustainability Platform

The negative impact of agriculture on both the environment and society has been widely documented with unsustainable farming practices serving to confound land conversion and habitat loss, wasteful water consumption, soil erosion and degradation, pollution and climate change. It has been reported that agricultural production is believed to be responsible for 70% of river and stream pollution from chemicals, silt and animal waste (source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Moreover, agriculture is the largest consumer of the Earth’s available freshwater: 70% of withdrawals from watercourses and groundwater are for agricultural usage, three times more than 50 years ago. By 2050, the global water demand of agriculture is estimated to increase by a further 19% due to irrigational needs (source: GlobalAgriculture.org).

Left unchecked, many believe that farming practiced without care presents the greatest global threat to species and ecosystems, especially given that demand for more food - and healthier food - is rising exponentially. According to the World Resources Institute, our planet will need 70 percent more food to feed a global population of 9.6 billion by 2050. In view of looming environmental and social crises facing our planet, both consumer packaged goods companies and their supply chain partners recognize the need ​to accelerate their shift towards greater transparency in their sustainability practices and policies as they assume greater responsibility for mitigating the use of chemicals in crop production and preserving natural resources.

We believe AgEagle to be the nation’s first drone-based aerial imagery company to utilize leading-edge data capture technology and customized analytics solutions to help promote and proactively support corporate and farming sustainability initiatives. In support of our efforts to promote our sustainability platform, in October 2018 we became a corporate partner of the Cool Farm Alliance (CFA), a non-profit organization promoting sustainability in the agriculture industry. Through the CFA’s Cool Farm Tool, businesses can utilize farming data to collaborate and develop sustainability metrics that provide the necessary insights to decrease their impact on the environment. By combining AgEagle’s technological capabilities and the unique data we can collect with the knowledge and expertise of the CFA team, we see an opportunity to measurably contribute to the establishment of a gold industry standard for sustainable agriculture.

In November 2018, we announced an agreement with one of the largest specialty crop producers in North America as our first customer on our sustainability platform and drone leasing program for the purposes2019 crop season. As part of the agreement, we are providing access to UAVs equipped with sensors for the growing season, along with access to data connected devices for farms covering thousands of acres in the United States. We are also setting up a network of soil moisture monitoring devices with rain gauges and soar sensors to provide in-depth data analytics at the field level. All of this report only:     is expected to culminate in a sustainability dashboard and scorecard that will provide data to assess and affirm soil health, water utilization efficiency and pest and disease control; which will, in turn, aid this specialty crop producer in showcasing its sustainability efforts and results to its customers and supply chain partners.

Our Growth Strategy

We intend to grow our business by achieving greater market penetration of the growing precision agriculture marketplace; by promoting our new service targeting the sustainable agriculture marketplace for the 2019 growing season; and by creating new, easier to use and higher value products that position AgEagle as a leading innovator and trusted solutions provider in the markets we serve. We may also elect to pursue additional opportunities in other industries outside of agriculture and its related areas.

Key components of our growth strategy include the following:

 

“Exchange Act” refersBuild a strong worldwide distribution network to offer a best-in-class precision agriculture platform.We believe we can establish our flying wing product and systems as leading technologies in the precision agriculture marketplace. We will work to identify and establish relationships with dealers and customers in key agricultural regions worldwide, which will help make it possible for every farmer in those markets to have access to the Securities Exchange ActAgEagle platform. Potential distributors are spread across six continents, covering a majority of 1934, as amended;the world’s major regions including the U.S., Canada, South America, Eastern and Western Europe, Southeast Asia and Oceania.

Table of Contents

“SEC”Launch and market our new UAV-based monitoring service for large food manufacturers desiring to achieve and maintain optimal sustainability practices on their farms.We are in the process of launching a new service for the 2019 growing season targeted towards large food manufacturers that are being pressured by consumers to create food products with less chemicals that are more sustainably sourced. We believe our current technology, combined with other available third-party platforms/solutions via a well-defined modern RESTful API, will allow us to offer a product to these food manufacturers that will serve to accelerate business growth faster than if we just focused on growth opportunities within the precision agriculture marketplace.
Continue to explore partnerships with companies that can expand our offerings. We intend to expand our product offerings by building relationships and partnerships with companies that have vertical, synergistic technologies. In addition, other technology alliances may include the acquisition or the “Commission” refersdevelopment of other electronics, software, sensors or more advanced aerial platforms. We are constantly meeting and in discussions with groups that could fill these roles and collaborate with us on new development ideas.
Support and expand our University Drone Program.Subsequent to the United States Securitiesend of 2018, we introduced our new University Drone Program providing for AgEagle’s aerial imaging collection and Exchange Commission;data processing systems to be purchased and utilized by colleges and universities to enhance the curriculum of their agriculture technology departments – including in precision ag, agronomy, plant science and mapping, among other related study areas. In January 2019, we announced that both Arkansas State University-Newport (ASU) and Modesto Junior College (MJC) in California have teamed with our Company to provide students with hands-on training and experience properly operating drones, creating digital aerial maps through the AgEagleFarmLens platform, and using data collected to achieve sustainable farming objectives. We believe that our University Drone Program not only represents a new revenue channel for us, but it will serve as a powerful brand-building opportunity for AgEagle among those who are studying to become commercial growers, agronomists and precision and sustainability ag experts and specialists.
Deliver new and innovative solutions in the precision agriculture space. Our research and development efforts are the foundation of our Company, and we intend to continue investing in our own innovations, pioneering new and enhanced products and solutions that enable us to satisfy our customers – both in response to and in anticipation of their needs. We believe that by investing in research and development, we can be a leader in delivering innovative products that address market needs within our current target markets, enabling us to create new opportunities for growth.
Pursue the expansion of the AgEagle platform of products and solutions into other industries besides agriculture.We may investigate and pursue opportunities outside of agriculture as we continue to expand and grow the AgEagle platform. We are confident in the UAV products and solutions we offer today and believe that these products and solutions could provide other industries the same kind of optimization we are currently providing the agriculture industry. These industries have yet to be identified by the AgEagle team but may include verticals such as land surveying and scanning, insurance, inspections and search and rescue.

Competitive Strengths

We believe the following attributes and capabilities provide us with long-term competitive advantages:

“Securities Act” refersProprietary Technology and Trade Secrets -We believe our unique design and in-house manufacturing of key aerospace components differentiates our product in the market place. We are confident that our UAVs are industry-leading in durability due to the Securities Actlightweight laminated shell of 1933, as amended.the wing, which is made using a proprietary manufacturing process innovated over five years of research and development. This process, which hardens the material used to build the shell, allows the UAV to perform in harsh weather conditions (with wind speeds up to 30 miles per hour) and bring itself to an unassisted landing, all at a total weight of about six pounds. This design is an important trade secret, and we have non-disclosure agreements with our employees in order to keep it unique to our Company.

 

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Table of Contents

Product has Global Appeal-We believe that our technology addresses a need for better data in the agriculture industry worldwide. Given our global distribution platform, we believe that we are well-positioned for our advanced products to be effectively marketed and sold to farmers worldwide.
Increased Margins for Farmers -We believe our UAVs will directly enhance margins for our customers by reducing the amount of nutrients and chemicals needed to manage their farms. The software equipped on our UAVs deliver a high-quality aerial map upon completion of the flight, allowing the user to accurately identify the specific areas that are malnourished. This software is compatible with precision applicator tractors, which assist users in applying a precise amount of nutrients in only the areas it is needed.
Increased Transparency for Food Manufacturers -We believe our UAVs and the data platform we continue to advance present us a unique opportunity to be one of the first companies to offer major food manufacturers a way to connect to the sustainable efforts being made by the farmers from whom they purchase ingredients for their food products. This would allow food manufacturers to confidently claim their food products are made with less chemicals on their packaging and in their marketing.
Empower Customers Through Our Self-Serve Platform -Our UAVs are specially designed to provide users with a portable and easy to operate device, which can be controlled with a hand-held unit or tablet. Through ourFarmLens™ platform, users will be able to plan and track an efficient flight path for their UAV. The UAVs are equipped with a camera and NIR filter whose images provide a holistic aerial view of the fields, along with meaningful data that is uploaded and delivered to the user within a very short time frame. As a result, this platform allows users to quickly detect any issues in their crops, which enables them to address such issues in a timely manner before any damage, or further damage, may affect their crops.
All Manufacturing of our Products is Completed in the United States -As of today, we manufacture all of our products at our manufacturing facility in Neodesha, Kansas, which allows us to avoid many of the potential difficulties that may arise if our manufacturing facilities were otherwise located outside the U.S. In addition, all our UAVs are designed and assembled here in the U.S.

Government Regulation

Our products are subject to regulations of the FAA. On June 21, 2016, the FAA announced it had finalized the first operational rules for routine commercial use of small Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), which for purposes of the regulations are unmanned aircraft weighing less than 55 pounds that are conducting non-hobbyist operations. UAS operators-for-hire will have to pass a written test and be vetted by the TSA, but no longer need to be airplane pilots as current law requires. The rules went into effect on August 20, 2016. Among other things, the new regulations require

 

preflight inspection by the remote pilot in command;
minimum weather visibility of three miles from the control station;
visual line-of-sight to the aircraft from the pilot and person manipulating the controls;
prohibit flying the aircraft over any persons not directly participating in the operation, not under a covered structure or not inside a covered stationary vehicle;
daylight or civil twilight operations (30 minutes before official sunrise to 30 minutes after official sunset, local time);

We file annual, quarterly

Table of Contents

maximum groundspeed of 100 mph (87 knots); and
maximum altitude of 400 feet above ground level or, if higher than 400 feet above ground level, the aircraft must remain within 400 feet of a structure.

The new regulations also establish a remote pilot in command position. A person operating a small unmanned aircraft must either hold a remote pilot airman certificate with a small unmanned aircraft system rating or be under the direct supervision of a person who does hold a remote pilot certificate (remote pilot in command). A pilot’s license is no longer required. To qualify for a remote pilot certificate, a person must: demonstrate aeronautical knowledge by either passing an initial aeronautical knowledge test at an FAA-approved knowledge testing center; or hold a part 61 pilot certificate other than student pilot, complete a flight review within the previous 24 months, and other reportscomplete a small UAS online training course provided by the FAA. The person must also be vetted by the TSA and other information with the SEC. You can read these SEC filings and reports over the Internetbe at the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov or on our website atwww.enerjex.com. You can alsoleast 16 years old. Applicants will obtain copiesa temporary remote pilot certificate upon successful completion of the documents at prescribed rates by writingTSA security vetting. The FAA anticipates that it will be able to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 on officialissue a temporary remote pilot certificate within 10 business days between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information on the operations of the public reference facilities. We will provideafter receiving a copy of our annual report to security holders, including audited financial statements, at no charge upon receipt to of a written request to us at EnerJex Resources, Inc., 4040 Broadway, Suite 425, San Antonio, Texas 78209.


INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATAcompleted remote pilot certificate application.

 

The market data and certain other statistical information used throughout this report are based on independent industry publications, government publications, reports by market research firms or other published independent sources.regulations do not require the use of a visual observer. In addition, some dataFAA airworthiness certification is not required. However, the remote pilot in command must conduct a preflight check of the small UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe operation.

Most of the restrictions can be waived by the FAA if the applicant demonstrates that his or her operation can safely be conducted under the terms of a certificate of waiver. The FAA maintains an online portal where a company or individual can apply for a certificate of waiver.

Manufacturing

As of today, we manufacture all of our products at our manufacturing facility in Neodesha, Kansas. We believe our current facilities are basedsufficient to adapt to our growth plans for the next two to three years and we have no current plans to expand our manufacturing capabilities.

Suppliers

Currently, we have strong relationships established with companies that provide many of the parts and services necessary to construct our advanced fixed wing and newly introduced UAVS drones, such as Botlink, MicaSense and 3DR. As our Company grows, we expect to pursue additional supplier relationships from which we can source cheaper and better supplies to stay ahead of the needs of the market.

Our flight planning and photo stitching software is provided by Pix4D and flight planning is QGroundControl an open source application. We have worked closely with software partners to optimize their software to work with our platform. We consider our relationships with Pix4D to be good; however, a loss of this relationship would have a short-term adverse effect on our good faith estimates.product offerings and results of operations, as we look to an alternative provider for our photo stitching software.

 

Revenue Mix

The table below reflects our revenue for the periods indicated by product mix

  For the Year Ended December 31,
Type 2018 2017
Product Sales  87%  100%
Subscription Sales  13%   

49 

 

PART IResearch and Development

Research and development activities are part of our business and we follow a disciplined approach to investing our resources to create new technologies and solutions. A fundamental part of this approach is a well-defined screening process that helps us identify commercial opportunities that support current desired technological capabilities in the precision agriculture space. Our research includes the expansion of our wing products, providing for developing a portfolio of UAVs, as well as other solutions to problems with which agriculture professionals struggle.

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESSRisks Relating to Our Business

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in the section titled “Risk Factors” found in Item 1A within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of these risks include, but are not limited to, risks associated with:

our need for additional funding;
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights;
rapid technological changes in the industry;
governmental policies and regulations regarding our industry;
our ability to maintain strong relationships with our customers, suppliers and distributors; and
worldwide and domestic economic trends and financial market conditions, including an economic decline in the agricultural industry.

Organizational History

 

Company HistoryOn March 26, 2018, our predecessor company, EnerJex Resources, Inc. (“EnerJex”), a Nevada company, consummated the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated October 19, 2017, pursuant to which AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex, merged with and into AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., a privately held company organized under the laws of the state of Nevada (“AgEagle Sub”), with AgEagle Sub surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex (the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger, EnerJex changed its name to AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (the “Company, “we,” “our,” or “us”) and AgEagle Sub changed its name to “Eagle Aerial, Inc.”

 

We werePrior to the Merger, EnerJex was formerly known as Millennium Plastics Corporation (“Millennium) and werewas incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 31, 1999. We abandoned a prior business plan focusing on the development of biodegradable plastic materials. In August 2006, weMillennium acquired Midwest Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation pursuant to a reverse merger. After thesuch merger, Midwest Energy became a wholly-owned subsidiary, and as a result of thesuch merger, the former Midwest Energy stockholders controlled approximately 98% of our outstanding shares of common stock. WeCommon Stock. Midwest then changed ourits name to EnerJex Resources, Inc., (“EnerJex”) in connection with thethis merger, and in November 2007, weit changed the name of Midwest Energy (now(one of our wholly-owned subsidiary)subsidiaries) to EnerJex Kansas, Inc. (“EnerJex Kansas”). All of our currentits operations are conducted prior to this merger were through EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Black Sable”) and Black Raven Energy, Inc. a Nevada corporation (“Black Raven”). Our leasehold interests arewere held in our wholly-owned subsidiaries Black Sable, Working Interest, LLC, (“Working Interest”) EnerJex Kansas and Black Raven.

 

Liquidity and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

As discussed under “Item 9B — Other Information” the continued low oil and natural gas prices during 2016 and 2017 have had a significant adverse impact on our business, and, as a result of our financial condition, substantial doubt exists thatOn July 25, 2018, we will be able to continue as a going concern.

On October 19, 2017, EnerJex entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement“Purchase Agreement”) with AgEagleEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary; Agribotix, LLC, a Nevada corporationColorado limited liability company (“AgEagleAgribotix” or the “Seller”), which designs, develops, produces,; and distributes technologically advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV or drones) that are supplied to the agriculture industry, and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”).other parties named therein. Pursuant to the termsPurchase Agreement, we acquired, on August 28, 2018, the closing date of such transaction, all right, title and subjectinterest in and to all assets owned by the conditionsSeller utilized in the Seller’s business of providing integrated agricultural drone solutions and drone-enabled software technologies and services for precision agriculture, except for certain excluded assets as set forth in the MergerPurchase Agreement Merger Sub will be merged with and into AgEagle, Merger Sub will cease to exist and AgEagle will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the Merger“Purchased Assets”). The respective boards of directors of EnerJex and AgEagle have approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), the shares of AgEagle capital stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive 85% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on a fully-diluted basis. In addition, at the Effective Time all outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle common stock will beclosing, we assumed by the Company and converted into options and warrants to purchase shares of Company common stock. No fractional shares of Company common stock will be issued in the Merger but will be rounded to the nearest whole share. Following the consummation of the Merger, former stockholders of AgEagle with respect to the Merger are expected to own 85% of the Company’s outstanding common stock (inclusive of the AgEagle assumed stock options and warrants), and current common and Series A Preferred stockholders of the Company are expected to own 15% of the Company, excluding shares of common stock that may be issued in connection with the conversion of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, and not including any additional shares which may be issued in connection with the Company’s closing obligation to provide up to $4 million in new working capital and the elimination of allcertain liabilities currently on the Company’s balance sheet.

In connection with the Merger, the Company agreed to file a proxy statement seeking stockholder approval (which proxy was filed as part of the Form S-4 Registration Statement filed by the Company which has become effective to date) to: (a) amend the terms of its Series A Preferred Stock (as discussed below); (b) approve the issuance of the Company’s shares in connection with the Merger to the AgEagle shareholders and new investors, in excess of 19.9% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (c) approve the issuance of shares to current Company management and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnity obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (d) change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Resources, Inc.” 

The Merger Agreement provides that, immediately following the Effective Time, the existing board of directors and officers of the Company will resign and new directors and officers will be appointed by AgEagle.

The Company intends to dispose of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties, concurrently with the closing of the Merger. In the event the Merger is not consummated, the Company does not have a present intention to dispose of the above described assets.


The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the stockholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the stockholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle stockholders in connection with the Merger and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listing of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants obligating each of the Company and AgEagle to continue to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course, to provide reasonable access to each other’s information and to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate and coordinate to make any filings or submissions that are required to be made under any applicable laws or requested to be made by any government authority in connection with the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contains a customary “no solicitation” provision pursuant to which, or the completion or termination of the Merger, neither the Company nor AgEagle may solicit or engage in discussions with any third party regarding another acquisition proposal unless, in the Company’s case, it has received an unsolicited, bona fide written proposal that the recipient’s board of directors determines is or would reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal. The Company has paid AgEagle a $50,000 non-refundable fee at the signing of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights in favor of each of the Company and AgEagle.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for indemnification in the event of any damages suffered by either party as a result of breaches of representations and warranties contained therein. The aggregate maximum indemnification obligation of any indemnifying party for damages with respect to breaches of representations and warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement shall not exceed, in the aggregate, $350,000, other than for fraud, intentional misrepresentation or willful breach. An indemnifying party shall satisfy its indemnification obligations with shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the aggregate amount of losses of the indemnified party, calculated based upon the greater of (i) the value of the Company common stock as of the closing of the Merger; and (ii) the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE American for the five trading days immediately prior to the date such a claim is made. The Company has agreed to deposit an aggregate of 1,215,278 shares of common stock to be issued to current officers and directors of the Company in lieu of deferred salary and fees into escrow to secure its indemnification obligations, the issuance of such shares requiring the approval of the Company’s common stockholders.

On October 19, 2017, concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, a principal stockholder of AgEagle (the “Key AgEagle Stockholder”) entered into a voting agreement in favor of EnerJex (the “EnerJex Voting Agreement”). Pursuant to the EnerJex Voting Agreement, the Key AgEagle Stockholder has agreed, among other things, to vote all shares of capital stock of AgEagle beneficially owned by him in favor of the Merger and the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the approval of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and any actions required in furtherance thereof. The AgEagle Voting Agreement will terminate upon the earliest to occur of: (i) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms; or (ii) the date on which the Merger becomes effective.

In connection with, and as a condition to the closing of the Merger, the Company is seeking the consent of the holder of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) to amend the terms thereof to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, and (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of Company common stock. An affirmative vote of 66.7% of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock voting as a class as of the record date of the proxy statement is required to amend the terms of the Certificate of Designation to provide for these changes, as required under the Merger Agreement. As of September 30, 2017, the Series A Preferred Stock had accrued a total of $6,039,972 in accrued but unpaid dividends, which would result in an additional 241,599 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued by the Company to satisfy these accrued dividends.

The Merger Agreement provides either party the right to terminate the Merger if it has not been consummated by January 31, 2018, provided that if all of the conditions to closing shall have been satisfied or shall be capable of being satisfied at such time, the required closing date may be extended until March 31, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company extended the required closing date with AgEagle to March 31, 2018.

More information regarding AgEagle, its business operations, financial results and risk factors relating thereto, is described in greater detail in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on October 20, 2017.

On November 21, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) signed a binding commitment letter with the Company to provide prior to or at the closing of the Merger, a minimum of $4 million in new equity capital at a pre-money valuation of between $16 million and $25 million (the “Private Placement”). Per the terms of this commitment letter, in the event any unaffiliated third parties of EnerJex participate in the Private Placement, Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall be reduced by such aggregate gross dollar amount funded by such unaffiliated third parties. Alpha has also agreed to convert all notes they hold from the Company into equity at the closing of the Merger. For their funding commitment, Alpha will receive a fee equal to 2.5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis payable at the closing of the Merger. Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall terminate on the earlier to occur of (i) the consummation of the Merger, and (ii) March 31, 2018. The Company further agreed that, at no time from the date hereof until the consummation of the Merger, shall it provide or disclose to Alpha any “material non-public information” regarding itself, without the prior consent of Alpha. The funding of the Private Placement is subject to standard conditions such as accuracy of representations and warranties provided in the Merger Agreement, and other similar conditions.

At a special meeting of shareholders held on March 21, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved (a) the issuance of the Company’s common stock to the shareholders of AgEagle in connection with andthird-party contracts pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement in accordance with NYSE American Rules 712 and 713; (b) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to amend the 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment for a reverse stock split (discussed below)), and (iv) increase the number of Series A Preferred shares by 241,599 shares; (c) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.”; (d) the adoption of the EnerJex 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); (e) the issuance of 2,248,264 shares of common stock to current officers and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s obligations under the Merger Agreement; (f) the conversion of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (g) the conversion of the Company’s 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (h) the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, conversion of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock and conversion of $425,000 owed under five promissory notes held by, Alpha Capital Anstalt, of which $200,000 of the notes have previously been converted into Series C Preferred Stock as of the date of this filing, into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American. 


The Plan provides for the grant of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock (such number based on a post-reverse split amount) as awards which may include incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), unrestricted shares, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, SARs, tandem stock appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, or any combination of the foregoing, to key management employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (however, solely Company employees or employees of the Company’s subsidiaries are eligible for incentive stock option awards).Purchase Agreement.

 

Additionally, the Company plans to conduct a 1-for-25 reverse stock split

10 

Table of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was approved by Company shareholders on April 27, 2017, prior to the closing of the Merger, which the Company anticipates occurring prior to March 31, 2018.Contents

In addition, as discussed below under “Significant Developments in 2017” the Company’s lender sold our loan on May 10, 2017.  

Significant Developments in 2017

The following briefly describes our most significant corporate developments occurring in 2017:

On February 10, 2017, the Company, Texas Capital Bank (“TCB”) and IberiaBank (collectively, “Sellers”), and PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, and certain financial institutions (collectively, “Buyers”) entered into a Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”), pursuant to which Sellers sold to Buyers, and Buyers purchased from Sellers, all of Sellers’ right, title and interest in, to and under the October 2011 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and related loan documents associated therewith, in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $5,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price”), (ii) a Synthetic Equity Interest equal to 10% of the proceeds, after Buyer’s realization of a 150% return on the Cash Purchase Price within five (5) years of the closing date of the sale, with payment being distributed 65.78947368% to TCB and 34.21052632% to IberiaBank, and (iii) at any time prior to February 10, 2022, Buyer may acquire the interest in clause (ii) above. In connection with the LSA, the Company released Sellers and its successors as holders of the rights under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, including Buyers, from any and all claims under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents. 

Also on February 10, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries, and successor lender entered into a binding letter agreement dated February 10, 2017, which was subsequently amended on March 30, 2017 (as amended, the “letter agreement”) pursuant to which:

1.the successor lender agreed to forgive our existing secured loan in the approximate principal amount of $17,295,000, and in exchange entered into a secured promissory note (which we refer to as the “restated secured note”) in the original principal amount of $4,500,000.
2.we:
a.conveyed our oil and gas properties and associated performance and surety bonds in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska;
b.conveyed all of our shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (together, the “conveyed oil and gas assets”); and
c.retained our assets in Kansas and continued as a going concern. The Kansas assets currently provide most of our current operating revenue.

The restated secured note:

a.is secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s oil and gas producing assets situated in the State of Kansas,
b.evidences accrued interest on the $4,500,000 principal balance at a rate of 16% per annum,
c.bears interest from and after May 1, 2017, at a rate of 16.0% per annum,

d.is pre-payable in full at a discount at any time during the term of the restated secured note upon the Company paying $3,300,000 to successor lender, and
e.matures and is due and payable in full on November 1, 2017 (subject to the extensions described below).

The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

So long as we repay the $3,300,000 in indebtedness on or prior to the maturity date, as extended, all other amounts payable under the restated secured note are to be forgiven.

The closing occurred on May 10, 2017. As part of the closing procedures and net settlement, we issued a promissory note to Pass Creek Resources LLC in the amount of $105,806. The promissory bears interest at 16% per annum and matured on June 9, 2017. The amount due was not paid on June 9, 2017, but the holder has not provided the Company a notice of default.


In connection with the May 10, 2017 closing and in consideration of the satisfaction of $13,425,000 of the amount due under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries transferred to PCR Holdings LLC, an affiliate of the successor lenders under the Credit Agreement, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties and assets located in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska, as well as the Company’s shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above. 

 

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees its subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties or assets.

On April 27, 2017, the Company entered into a Services Agreement (“Service Agreement”) with Camber Energy, Inc., to perform certain outsourced interim services for $150,000 per month. Effective December 4, 2017, the Company and Camber Energy, Inc. (“Camber”), mutually agreed to terminate the agreement between the parties effective November 30, 2017.

On December 20, 2017, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement for the sale of 1,061,750 shares of its Series A 10% Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”). The Preferred Stock was sold to one investor at $0.612 per share or the aggregate of $649,791. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the sale of the Preferred Stock to satisfy certain closing conditions of the Merger.

On December 22, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Date of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provides notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of the First Amendment, the Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have the option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.Headquarters

 

Our Business

principal executive offices are located at 117 S. 4th Street, Neodesha, Kansas 66757 and our telephone number is 316-202-2076. Our principal strategy, other than completing the Merger as described above,website address is to acquire, develop, explore and produce domestic onshore oil and natural gas properties. Our business activities are currently focused in Kansas.

Our total net proved oil and gas reserves aswww.ageagle.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of December 31, 2017 were 0.5 million barrels of oil equivalents (BOE), of which 100% was oil. Of the 0.5 million BOE of total proved reserves, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped.

The total PV10 (present value) ofthis Annual Report. We have included our proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $1.5 million. “PV10” means the estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development and abandonment costs after giving consideration of salvage value there were no material abandonment costs included in future development costs, using prices and costs in effect at the determination date, before income taxes, and without giving effect to non-property related expenses, discounted to a present value using an annual discount rate of 10% in accordance with the guidelines of the SEC. PV10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Reserves” page 36, for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.

Except where noted, the discussion regarding our businesswebsite address in this Annual Report on Form 10-K issolely as of December 31, 2017.


Our Kansas Propertiesan inactive textual reference.

 

The table below summarizes our current Kansas acreage by project name as of December 31, 2017.

Project Name Developed Acreage(1)  Undeveloped Acreage  Total Acreage 
  Gross  Net(2)  Gross  Net (2)  Gross  Net(2) 
Mississippian Project  4,365   3,492         4,365   3,492 
Other  584   146         584   146 
Total  4,949   3,638         4,949   3,638 

(1)Developed acreage includes all acreage that was held by production as of December 31, 2017.
(2)Net acreage is based on our net working interest as of December 31, 2017.

Mississippian Project

Our Mississippian Project is located in Woodson and Greenwood Counties in Southeast Kansas, where we own a 90% working interest in 4,949 gross acres. Approximately 73.5% of the gross leased acres in this project are currently held-by-production.Employees

 

As of December 31, 2017, our Mississippian Project was producing approximately 100 gross barrels of oil per day from the Mississippian formation at a depth of approximately 1,700 feet. 2018, we employed 5 full-time and 1 part-time employee.

 

Our Business StrategyIntellectual Property

 

Since the execution of the merger agreement on October 19, 2017, our primary business strategy has focused on achieving the requirements necessary to consummate the merger. We continue to move forward with this strategy with an anticipated closing prior to March 31, 2018. Prior to our pending merger, our principal strategy focusedcurrently have a registered trademark on the development of oilAgEagle and gas properties that have low production decline ratesFarmLens name and offer drilling opportunities with low risk profiles. Our oil and gas operations are in Kansas. The principal elementslogo. We also plan to file provisional patents on certain aspects of our business strategy were:current and future technology. Finally, we consider our UAV manufacturing process to be a trade secret and have non-disclosure agreements with current employees to protect those and other trade secrets held by the Company.

Where You Can Find Additional Information

The Company is subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. The Company files with, or furnishes to, the SEC quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports and will furnish its proxy statement. These filings are available free of charge on the Company’s website, wwwageagle.com, shortly after they are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet website, www.sec.gov, which contains reports and information statements and other information regarding issuers.

 

ITEM 1A.Develop Our Existing Properties.  Creating production, cash flow, and reserve growth by developing our inventory of hundreds of drilling locations that we have identified on our existing properties.
Maximize Operational Control.  We seek to operate and maintain a substantial working interest in the majority of our properties. We believe the ability to control our drilling inventory will provide us with the opportunity to more efficiently allocate capital, manage resources, control operating and development costs, and utilize our experience and knowledge of oil and gas field technologies.
Reduce Unit Costs Through Economies of Scale and Efficient Operations.   As we increase our oil and gas production and develop our existing properties, we expect that our unit cost structure will benefit from economies of scale. In particular, we anticipate reducing unit costs by greater utilization of our existing infrastructure over a larger number of wells.RISK FACTORS

 

The risk factors discussed below could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Although we have attempted to list comprehensively these important factors, we caution you that other factors may in the future prove to be important in affecting our results of operations. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors, nor can we assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

The risks described below set forth what we believe to be the most material risks associated with the purchase of our Common Stock. Before you invest in our Common Stock, you should carefully consider these risk factors, as well as the other information contained in this prospectus.

Risks Related to Our future financial resultsBusiness and Industry

11 

We have a limited operating history and there can be no assurance that we can achieve or maintain profitability.

Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Eagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (“AgEagle Sub”), we have been operating for approximately eight years. However, AgEagle Sub has only been in the UAV business for half of that time. We are currently in the business development stage and have limited commercial sales of our products and, accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will become profitable. Moreover, even if we achieve profitability, given the competitive and evolving nature of the industry in which we operate, we may be unable to sustain or increase profitability and its failure to do so would adversely affect its business, including its ability to raise additional funds.

We will need substantial additional funding and may be unable to raise capital when needed, which would force us to delay, curtail or eliminate one or more of our research and development programs or commercialization efforts.

Our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. We expect to continue to depend on:spend substantial amounts on product development. We will require additional funds to support continued research and development activities, as well as the costs of commercializing, marketing and selling any new products resulting from those research and development activities. We have based this estimate, however, on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could spend available financial resources much faster than we currently expect.

Until such time, if ever, that we can generate a sufficient amount of product revenue and achieve profitability, we expect to seek to finance future cash needs through equity or debt financings or corporate collaboration and strategic arrangements. We currently have no other commitments or agreements relating to any of these types of transactions and cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital, we may have to delay, curtail or eliminate commercializing, marketing and selling one or more of our products.

Product development is a long, expensive and uncertain process.

The development of both UAV software and hardware is a costly, complex and time-consuming process, and investments in product development often involve a long wait until a return, if any, can be achieved on such investment. We might face difficulties or delays in the development process that will result in our inability to timely offer products that satisfy the market, which might allow competing products to emerge during the development and certification process. We anticipate making significant investments in research and development relating to our products and services, but such investments are inherently speculative and require substantial capital expenditures. Any unforeseen technical obstacles and challenges that we encounter in the research and development process could result in delays in or the abandonment of product commercialization, may substantially increase development costs, and may negatively affect our results of operations.

Successful technical development of our products does not guarantee successful commercialization.

Although we have successfully completed the technical development of our two original UAV systems, as well as the new RX-60 and RX-48 systems, we may still fail to achieve commercial success for a number of reasons, including, among others, the following:

12 

 

failure to obtain the market pricerequired regulatory approvals for oil, gas and natural gas liquids;their use;
   
our ability to preserve sufficient working capital and maintain access to capital resources;
our ability to cost effectively manage our operations;
our ability to source and evaluate potential projects;
our ability to discover and exploit commercial quantitiesrapid evolvement of oil and gas; and

our ability to implement development program.

We cannot guarantee that we will succeed in any of these respects. Further, we cannot know if the price of crude oil and natural gas prevailing at the time of production will be at a level allowing for profitable production, or that we will be able to obtain additional funding at terms favorable to us to increase our capital resources. A detailed description of these and other risks that could materially impact our actual results is in “Risk Factors” under ITEM 1A.

In the event the merger is not consummated, our intent is to refocus on the development of oil and gas properties as set forth above. 

Drilling Activity

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had no drilling activity.

Net Production, Average Sales Price and Average Production and Lifting Costs

The table below sets forth our net oil and gas production (net of all royalties, overriding royalties and production due to others) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the average sales prices, average production costs and direct lifting costs per unit of production.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Net Production        
Crude oil (bbl)  31,834   58,123 
Natural gas liquids (bbl)  75   530 
Natural gas (mcf)  11,649   47,554 
         
Average Sales Prices        
Crude oil ($ per bbl)  41.04   40.75 
Natural gas liquids ($ per bbl)  12.70   7.02 
Natural gas (per $ mcf)  1.67   1.51 
         
Average Production Cost(1)  $  per BOE  39.26   43.79 
Average Lifting Costs(2) $ per BOE  40.29   39.97 

(1)Production costs include all operating expenses, depreciation, depletion and amortization, lease operating expenses (including price differentials) and all associated taxes. Impairment of oil and gas properties is not included in production costs.
(2)Direct lifting costs do not include impairment expense or depreciation, depletion and amortization, but do include transportation costs, which are paid to our purchasers as a price differential.

Results of Oil and Gas Producing Activities

The following table shows the results of operations from our oil and gas producing activities from the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Results of operations from these activities have been determined using historical revenues, production costs, depreciation, depletion and amortization of the capitalized costs subject to amortization. General and administrative expenses and interest expense have been excluded from this determination.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Production revenues $1,329,004  $2,461,727 
Production costs  (1,363,946)  (2,661,258)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  (127,713)  (254,329)
Results of operations for producing activities $(162,655) $(453,860)

Active Wells

The following table sets forth the number of wells in which we owned a working interest that were actively producing oil and gas or actively injecting water as of December 31, 2017.

  Active 
Project Gross  Net(1) 
Crude Oil        
Mississippian Project  45   40.5 
Other  3   2.7 
Total Oil  48   43.2 

(1)Net wells are based on our net working interest as of December 31, 2017.


Reserves

Proved Reserves

The estimated total PV10 (present value) of our proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 was $1.5 million, compared to $3.4 million as of December 31, 2016. Our total net proved oil and gas reserves as of December 31, 2017 were 0.5 million BOE (100% oil), compared to 1.6 million BOE (64.1% natural gas) as of December 31, 2016. Of the 0.5 million net BOE of total proved reserves at December 31, 2017, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped. See “Glossary” on page 14 for our definition of PV10.

The estimated PV10 of the 0.5 million BOE is set forth in the following table. The PV10 is calculated using an average net oil price of $45.45 per barrel and by applying an annual discount rate of 10% to the forecasted future net cash flow.

Summary of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

December 31, 2017

  Gross  Net    
     Natural
Gas 
     Oil      Natural
Gas 
     Oil     
Proved Reserves Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  PV 10(2) 
Category BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s  BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s(1)  (before tax) 
Proved, Developed  94,100         94,100   66,810         66,810   511,740 
Proved, Undeveloped  525,100         525,100   388,980         388,980   956,800 
Total Proved  619,200         619,200   455,800         455,800   1,468,540 

(1)Net BOE is based upon our net revenue interest
(2)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Reserves” page 34 for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.

Oil and Gas Reserves Reported to Other Agencies

We did not file any estimates of total proved net oil and gas reserves with, or include such information in reports to any federal authority or agency, other than the SEC, during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Title to Properties

We believe that we have satisfactory title to or rights in all of our producing properties. As is customary in the oil and gas industry, minimal investigation of title is made at the time of acquisition of undeveloped properties. In most cases, we investigate title and obtain title opinions from counsel or have title reviewed by professional landmen only when we acquire producing properties or before we begin drilling operations. However, any acquisition of producing properties without obtaining title opinions is subject to a greater risk of title defects.

Our properties are subject to customary royalty interests, liens under indebtedness, liens incident to operating agreements and liens for current taxes and other burdens, including mineral encumbrances and restrictions. Further, our debt is secured by liens substantially on all of our assets. These burdens have not materially interfered with the use of our properties in the operation of our business to date, though there can be no assurance that such burdens will not materially impact our operations in the future.

Sale of Oil and Gas

We do not intend to refine our oil production. We expect to sell all or most of our production to a small number of purchasers in a manner consistent with industry practices at prevailing rates by means of long-term and short-term sales contracts, some of which may have fixed price components. In 2017, we sold oil to ARM Energy Management LLC, Coffeyville Resources, Inc., and Sunoco Logistics, Inc. on a month-to-month basis (i.e., without a long-term contract). We sold our natural gas to United Energy Trading on a month-to-month basis and Western Operating Company under a long-term contract. Under current conditions, we should be able to find other purchasers, if needed. All of our produced oil is held in tank batteries. Each respective purchaser picks up the oil from our tank batteries and transports it by truck to refineries.


Secondary Recovery and Other Production Enhancement Strategies

When an oil field is first produced, the oil typically is recovered as a result of natural pressure within the producing formation, often assisted by pumps of various types. The only natural force present to move the crude oil to the wellbore is the pressure differential between the higher pressure in the formation and the lower pressure in the wellbore. At the same time, there are many factors that act to impede the flow of crude oil, depending on the nature of the formation and fluid properties, such as pressure, permeability, viscosity and water saturation. This stage of production is referred to as “primary production”, which typically only recovers 5% to 15% of the crude oil originally in place in a producing formation.

Production from oil fields can often be enhanced through the implementation of “secondary recovery”, also known as water flooding, which is a method in which water is injected into the reservoir through injector wells in order to maintain or increase reservoir pressure and push oil to the adjacent producing wellbores. We utilize water flooding as a secondary recovery technique for the majority of our oil properties in Kansas.

As a water flood matures over time, the fluid produced contains increasing amounts of water and decreasing amounts of oil. Surface equipment is used to separate the produced oil from water, with the oil going to holding tanks for sale and the water being re-injected into the oil reservoir.

In addition, we may utilize 3D seismic analysis, horizontal drilling, and other technologies and production techniques to improve drilling results and oil recovery, and to ultimately enhance our production and returns. We also believe use of such technologies and production techniques in exploring for, developing, and exploiting oil properties will help us reduce drilling risks, lower finding costs and provide for more efficient production of oil from our properties.

Markets and Marketing

The oil and gas industry has experienced dramatic price volatility in recent years. As a commodity, global oil prices respond to macro-economic factors affecting supply and demand. In particular, world oil prices have risen and fallen in response to political unrest and supply uncertainty in the Middle East, and changing demand for energy in rapidly emerging market economies, notably India and China. North American prospects became more attractive as oil prices rose worldwide. Escalating conflicts in the Middle East and the ability of OPEC to control supply and pricing are some of the factors impacting the availability of global supply. As a commodity, natural gas prices respond mainly to regional supply and demand imbalances. Factors that affect the supply side include production of natural gas, levels of natural gas imports and fluctuations in underground storage. Factors that affect the demand side include peak demand brought on by winter heating and summer cooling requirements and increasing demand from the petrochemical industry for their produced products such as plastics, fertilizers, paints, soaps etc. The costs of steel and other products used to construct drilling rigs and pipeline infrastructure, as well as, drilling and well-servicing rig rates, are impacted by the commodity price volatility.

Our market is affected by many factors beyond our control, such as the availability of other domestic production, commodity prices, the proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines, and general fluctuations of global and domestic supply and demand. In 2017 we had month-to-month sales contracts with ARM Energy Management LLC, Coffeyville Resources, Inc., Sunoco Logistics, Inc., United Energy Trading and Western Operating Company and we do not anticipate difficulty in finding additional sales opportunities, as and when needed.

Oil and gas sales prices are negotiated based on factors such as the spot price or posted price for oil and gas, price regulations, regional price variations, hydrocarbon quality, distances from wells to pipelines, well pressure, and estimated reserves. Many of these factors are outside our control. Oil and gas prices have historically experienced high volatility, related in part to ever-changing perceptions within the industry of future supply and demand.

Competition

The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive and we must compete against larger companies that may have greater financial and technical resources than we do and substantially more experience in our industry. These competitive advantages may better enable our competitors to sustain the impact of higher exploration and production costs, oil and gas price volatility, productivity variances between properties, overall industry cycles and other factors related to our industry. Their advantage may also negatively impact our ability to acquire prospective properties, develop reserves, attract and retain quality personnel and raise capital.

Research and Development Activities

We have not spent a material amount of time or money on research and development activities in the last two years.


Governmental Regulations

Our oil and gas exploration, production and related operations, when developed, are subject to extensive rules and regulations promulgated by federal, state, tribal and local authorities and agencies that impose requirements relating to the exploration and production of oil and natural gas. For example, laws and regulations often address conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties, the spacing, plugging and abandonment of wells, rates of production, water discharge, prevention of waste, and other matters. Prior to drilling, we are often required to obtain permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and file reports concerning operations. Failure to comply with any such rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. Moreover, laws and regulations may place burdens from previous operations on current lease owners that can be significant.

The public attention on the production of oil and gas will most likely increase the regulatory burden on our industry and increase the cost of doing business, which may affect our profitability. Although we believe we are currently in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, because such rules and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted, we are unable to predict the future cost or impact of complying with such laws. Significant expenditures may be required to comply with governmental laws and regulations and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The price we may receive from the sale of oil and gas will be affected by the cost of transporting products to markets. Effective January 1, 1995, FERC implemented regulations establishing an indexing system for transportation rates for oil and gas pipelines, which, generally, would index such rates to inflation, subject to certain conditions and limitations. We are not able to predict with certainty the effect, if any, of these regulations on our intended operations. However, the regulations may increase transportation costs or reduce well head prices for oil and natural gas.

Environmental Matters

Our operations and properties are subject to extensive and changing federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment, and relating to safety and health. The recent trend in environmental legislation and regulation generally is toward stricter standards, and this trend will likely continue.

These laws and regulations may:

require the acquisition of a permit or other authorization before construction or drilling commences and for certain other activities;
limit or prohibit construction, drilling and other activities on certain lands; and
impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from its operations, orproduct due to previous operations conducted on any leased lands.

The permits required for our operations may be subject to revocation, modification and renewal by issuing authorities. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce their regulations, and violations are subject to fines or injunctions, or both. In the opinion of management, we are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws and regulations, and have no material commitments for capital expenditures to comply with existing environmental requirements. Nevertheless, changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or in interpretations thereof could have a significant impact on us, as well as the oil and gas industry in general.

The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (“CERCLA”), and comparable state statutes impose strict, joint and several liability on owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of “hazardous substances” found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the neighboring land owners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (“RCRA”), and comparable state statutes govern the disposal of “solid waste” and “hazardous waste” and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance. Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from its definition of “hazardous substance,” state laws affecting our operations may impose clean-up liability relating to petroleum and petroleum related products. In addition, although RCRA classifies certain oil and gas field wastes as “non-hazardous”, such exploration and production wastes could be reclassified as hazardous wastes thereby making such wastes subject to more stringent handling and disposal requirements.

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended (“Clean Water Act”), and analogous state laws impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into federal and state waters. These laws also regulate the discharge of storm water in process areas. Pursuant to these laws and regulations, we are required to obtain and maintain approvals or permits for the discharge of wastewater and storm water and develop and implement spill prevention, control and countermeasure plans, also referred to as “SPCC plans”, in connection with on-site storage of greater than threshold quantities of oil and gas. The EPA issued revised SPCC rules in July 2002 whereby SPCC plans are subject to more rigorous review and certification procedures. We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable Clean Water Act and analogous state requirements, including those relating to wastewater and storm water discharges and SPCC plans.


The Endangered Species Act, as amended (“ESA”), seeks to ensure that activities do not jeopardize endangered or threatened animal, fish and plant species, nor destroy or modify the critical habitat of such species. Under ESA, exploration and production operations, as well as actions by federal agencies, may not significantly impair or jeopardize the species or its habitat. ESA provides for criminal penalties for willful violations of the Act. Other statutes that provide protection to animal and plant species and that may apply to our operations include, but are not necessarily limited to, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the National Historic Preservation Act. Although we believe that our operations will be in substantial compliance with such statutes, any change in these statutes or any reclassification of a species as endangered could subject us to significant expenses to modify our operations or could force us to discontinue certain operations altogether.

Personnel

We currently have one full-time employee. We are using and will continue to use independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, particularly in the area of land services, reservoir engineering, and general and administrative functions. We believe that this use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to contain operating and general expenses, and capital costs.

GLOSSARY

TermDefinitionnew technologies;
   
Barrel (Bbl)The standard unit of measurement of liquids in the petroleum industry, it contains 42 U.S. standard gallons. Abbreviated to “bbl”.prohibitive production costs;
   
BasinA depression in the crust of the Earth, caused by plate tectonic activity and subsidence, in which sediments accumulate. Sedimentary basins vary from bowl-shaped to elongated troughs. Basins can be bounded by faults. Rift basins are commonly symmetrical; basins along continental margins tend to be asymmetrical. If rich hydrocarbon source rocks occur in combination with appropriate depth and duration of burial, then a petroleum system can develop within the basin.competing products;
   
BOEAbbreviation for a barrellack of oil equivalent and is a term used to summarize the amount of energy that is equivalent to the amount of energy found in a barrel of crude oil. On a BTU basis 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas is the energy equivalent to one barrel of crude oil. A conversion ratio of 6:1 is used to convert natural gas measured in thousands of cubic feet into an equivalent barrel of oil.product innovation;
   
BOPDAbbreviation for barrels of oil per day, a common unit of measurement for volume of crude oil. The volume of a barrel is equivalent to 42 U.S. standard gallons.unsuccessful distribution and marketing through our sales channels;
   
Carried Working InterestThe owner of this type of working interest in the drilling of a well incurs no capital contribution requirement for drilling or completion costs associated with a well and, if specified in the particular contract, may not incur capital contribution requirements beyond the completion of the well.
Completion/CompletingThe activities and methods of preparing a well for the production of oil and gas or for other purposes such as injection.
DevelopmentThe phase in which a proven oil or natural gas field is brought into production by drilling development wells.
Development DrillingWells drilled during the Development phase.
Division OrderA directive signed by all owners verifying to the purchaser or operator of a well the decimal interest of production owned by the royalty owner and other working interest owners. The Division Order generally includes the decimal interest, a legal description of the property, the operator’s name, and several legal agreements associated with the process. Completion of this step generally precedes placing the royalty owner or working interest owner on pay status to begin receiving revenue payments.
DrillingAct of boring a hole through which oil and natural gas may be produced.
Dry WellsA well found to be incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such that proceeds from the sale of such production exceed production expenses and taxes.


ExplorationThe phase of operations which covers the search for oil and gas generally in unproven or semi-proven territory.
Exploratory DrillingDrilling of a relatively high percentage of properties which are unproven.
Farm OutAn arrangement whereby the owner of a lease assigns all or some portion of the lease or licenses to another company for undertaking exploration or development activity.
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
Fixed Price SwapA derivative instrument that exchanges or “swaps” the “floating” or daily price of a specified volume of oil or natural gas over a specified period, for a fixed price for the specified volume over the same period (typically three months or longer).
Gross AcreThe number of acres in which the Company owns any working interest.
Gross Producing WellA well in which a working interest is owned and is producing oil or gas. The number of gross producing wells is the total number of wells producing oil or gas in which a working interest is owned.
Gross WellA well in which a working interest is owned. The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned.
Held-By-Production (HBP)Refers to an oil and gas property under lease, in which the lease continues to be in force, because of production from the property.
Horizontal drillingA drilling technique used in certain formations where a well is drilled vertically to a certain depth and then turned and drilled horizontally. Horizontal drilling allows the wellbore to follow the desired formation.
In-Fill WellsIn-fill wells refers to wells drilled between established producing wells; a drilling program to reduce the spacing between wells in order to increase production and recovery of in-place hydrocarbons.
Oil and Gas LeaseA legal instrument executed by a mineral owner granting the right to another to explore, drill, and produce subsurface oil and gas. An oil and gas lease embodies the legal rights, privileges and duties pertaining to the lessor and lessee.
Lifting CostsThe expenses of producing oil and gas from a well. Lifting costs are the operating costs of the wells including the gathering and separating equipment. Lifting costs do not include the costs of drilling and completing the wells or transporting the oil and gas.
MCFAn abbreviation for one thousand cubic feet of natural gas.
Net AcresDetermined by multiplying gross acres by the working interest that the Company owns in such acres.
Net Producing WellsThe number of producing wells multiplied by the working interest in such wells.
Net Revenue InterestA share of production revenues after all royalties, overriding royalties and other non-operating interests have been taken out of production for a well(s).
OperatorA person, acting for itself, or as an agent for others, designated to conduct the operations on its or the joint interest owners’ behalf.

Overriding RoyaltyOwnership in a percentage of production or production revenues, free of the cost of production, created by the lessee, company and/or working interest owner and paid by the lessee, company and/or working interest owner out of revenue from the well.
Probable ReservesProbable reserves are additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with Proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.


Proved Developed ReservesProved reserves that can be expected to be recovered from existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. This definition of proved developed reserves has been abbreviated from the applicable definitions contained in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X.
Proved Developed Non-ProducingProved developed reserves expected to be recovered from zones behind casings in existing wells or from future production increases resulting from the effects of water flood operations.
Proved ReservesProved reserves are estimated quantities of crude oil and gas which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic, operating methods, and government regulations prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.
Proved Undeveloped ReservesProved undeveloped reserves are the portion of proved reserves which can be expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled proved acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for completion. This definition of proved undeveloped reserves has been abbreviated from the applicable definitions contained in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X.
PV10PV10 means the estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development and abandonment costs, using prices and costs in effect at the determination date, before income taxes, and without giving effect to non-property related expenses, discounted to a present value using an annual discount rate of 10% in accordance with the guidelines of the SEC. PV10 is a non-GAAP financial measure.  See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Reserves” on page 34 for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.
ReactivationAfter the initial completion of a well, the action and techniques of reentering the well and redoing or repairing the original completion to restore the well’s productivity.
RecompletionCompletion of an existing well for production from one formation or reservoir to another formation or reservoir that exists behind casing of the same well.
ReservoirThe underground rock formation where oil and gas has accumulated. It consists of a porous rock to hold the oil and gas, and a cap rock that prevents its escape.

Secondary RecoveryThe stage of hydrocarbon production during which an external fluid such as water or natural gas is injected into the reservoir through injection wells located in rock that has fluid communication with production wells. The purpose of secondary recovery is to maintain reservoir pressure and to displace hydrocarbons toward the wellbore.  The most common secondary recovery techniques are natural gas injection and water flooding. Normally, natural gas is injected into the natural gas cap and water is injected into the production zone to sweep oil and gas from the reservoir.  A pressure-maintenance program can begin during the primary recovery stage, but it is a form of enhanced recovery.
Stock Tank Barrel or STBA stock tank barrel of oil and gas is the equivalent of 42 U.S. Gallons at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
Undeveloped AcreageLease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of oil and gas regardless of whether such acreage contains proved reserves.
Unitize, UnitizationWhen owners of oil and gas reservoir pool their individual interests in return for an interest in the overall unit.
Water floodThe injection of water into an oil and gas reservoir to “push” additional oil and gas out of the reservoir rock and into the wellbores of producing wells. Typically a secondary recovery process.
Water Injection WellsA well in which fluids are injected rather than produced, the primary objective typically being to maintain or increase reservoir pressure, often pursuant to a water flood.
Water Supply WellsA well in which fluids are being produced for use in a water injection well.

WellboreA borehole; the hole drilled by the bit. A wellbore may have casing in it or it may be open (uncased); or part of it may be cased, and part of it may be open. Also called a borehole or hole.
Working InterestAn interest in an oil and gas lease entitling the owner to receive a specified percentage of the proceeds of the sale of oil and gas production or a percentage of the production, but requiring the owner of the working interest to bear the cost to explore for, develop and produce such oil and gas.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

In the course of conducting our business operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks that are inherent to the oil and gas industry. The following discusses some of the key inherent risk factors that could affect our business and operations. Other factors besides those discussed below or elsewhere in this report also could adversely affect our business and operations, and these risk factors should not be considered a complete list of potential risks that may affect us.

For risk factors regarding AgEagle, its business operations and financial results, which will become our business operations and financial results following the consummation of the Merger, see the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on October 20, 2017.

Risks Related to Recent Developments

Due to our substantial liquidity concerns, we may be unable to continue as a going concern.

On October 19, 2017, EnerJex entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”), which designs, develops, produces, and distributes technologically advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV or drones) that are supplied to the agriculture industry, and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into AgEagle, Merger Sub will cease to exist and AgEagle will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). The respective boards of directors of EnerJex and AgEagle have approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), the shares of AgEagle capital stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive equal to 85% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis. In addition, at the Effective Time all outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle common stock will be assumed by the Company and converted into options and warrants to purchase shares of Company common stock. No fractional shares of Company common stock will be issued in the Merger but will be rounded to the nearest whole share. Following the consummation of the Merger, former stockholders of AgEagle with respect to the Merger are expected to own 85% of the Company’s outstanding common stock (inclusive of the AgEagle assumed stock options and warrants), and current common and Series A Preferred stockholders of the Company are expected to own 15% of the Company, excluding shares of common stock that may be issued in connection with the conversion of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, and not including any additional shares which may be issued in connection with the Company’s closing obligation to provide up to $4 million in new working capital and the elimination of all liabilities currently on the Company’s balance sheet.

In connection with the Merger, the Company will also file a proxy statement seeking stockholder approval to: (a) amend the terms of its Series A Preferred Stock (as discussed below); (b) approve the issuance of the Company’s shares in connection with the Merger to the AgEagle shareholders and new investors, in excess of 19.9% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (c) approve the issuance of shares to current Company management and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnity obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (d) change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Resources, Inc.” 

The Merger Agreement provides that, immediately following the Effective Time, the existing board of directors and officers of the Company will resign and new directors and officers will be appointed by AgEagle.

The Company intends to dispose of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties, concurrently with the closing of the Merger. In the event the Merger is not consummated, the Company does not have a present intention to dispose of the above described assets.

 17

The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the stockholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the stockholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle stockholders in connection with the Merger and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listing of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants obligating each of the Company and AgEagle to continue to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course, to provide reasonable access to each other’s information and to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate and coordinate to make any filings or submissions that are required to be made under any applicable laws or requested to be made by any government authority in connection with the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contains a customary “no solicitation” provision pursuant to which, prior to the earlier of January 31, 2018, or the completion or termination of the Merger, neither the Company nor AgEagle may solicit or engage in discussions with any third party regarding another acquisition proposal unless, in the Company’s case, it has received an unsolicited, bona fide written proposal that the recipient’s board of directors determines is or would reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal. The Company has paid AgEagle a $50,000 non-refundable fee at the signing of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights in favor of each of the Company and AgEagle.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for indemnification in the event of any damages suffered by either party as a result of breaches of representations and warranties contained therein. The aggregate maximum indemnification obligation of any indemnifying party for damages with respect to breaches of representations and warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement shall not exceed, in the aggregate, $350,000, other than fraud, intentional misrepresentation or willful breach. An indemnifying party shall satisfy its indemnification obligations with shares of Company common stock equal to the aggregate amount of losses of the indemnified party, calculated based upon the greater of (i) the value of the Company common stock as of the closing of the Merger; and (ii) the average closing price of the Company common stock on the NYSE American for the five trading days immediately prior to the date such a claim is made. The Company has agreed to deposit an aggregate of 1,215,278 shares of common stock to be issued to current officers and directors of the Company in lieu of deferred salary and fees into escrow to secure its indemnification obligations, the issuance of such shares requiring the approval of the Company’s common stockholders.

In connection with, and as a condition to the closing of the Merger, the Company is seeking the consent of the holder of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) to amend the terms thereof to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, and (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of Company common stock. An affirmative vote of 66.7% of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock voting as a class as of the record date of the proxy statement is required to amend the terms of the Certificate of Designation to provide for these changes, as required under the Merger Agreement. As of September 30, 2017, the Series A Preferred Stock had accrued a total of $6,039,972 in accrued but unpaid dividends, which would result in an additional 241,599 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued by the Company to satisfy these accrued dividends.

The Merger Agreement provides either party the right to terminate the Merger if it has not been consummated by January 31, 2018, provided that if all of the conditions to closing shall have been satisfied or shall be capable of being satisfied at such time, the required closing date may be extended until March 31, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company extended the required closing date with AgEagle to March 31, 2018.

Should we not be able to close this transaction, our existing and future debt agreements become due and that will threaten our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will seek to negotiate an extension of such indebtedness or may seek bankruptcy protection if this transaction is not approved by the shareholders.

In the event the Merger closes, it will cause immediate and substantial dilution to existing shareholders and a change of control of the Company.

As described above, we are party to a Merger Agreement with AgEagle relating to the acquisition by us of the outstanding securities of AgEagle.  We anticipate the consideration exchanged with AgEagle for the securities of AgEagle will be 85% of our total outstanding securities on a fully-diluted basis.  Additionally, we anticipate issuing other securities in connection with the Merger, including, but not limited to, in order to raise funding in connection therewith. As such, in the event the contemplated transaction closes, the issuance of the common stock consideration to AgEagle and to other parties will result in immediate and substantial dilution to the interests of our then shareholders and result in a change of control of the Company.

 18

The Merger Agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger.

The Merger Agreement contains provisions that could adversely impact competing proposals to acquire us. These provisions include the prohibition on us generally from soliciting any acquisition proposal or offer for a competing transaction. These provisions might discourage a third party that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of our company from considering or proposing an acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay consideration with a higher value than the current proposed Merger consideration.

Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact our stock price and future business and financial results.

If the Merger is not completed, our ongoing business may be adversely affected and we would be subject to a number of risks, including the following:

we will not realize the benefits expectedinsufficient cooperation from the Merger, including a potentially enhanced competitiveour supply and financial position, expansion of operations, and will instead be subject to all the risks we currently face as an independent company;
we may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and our partners and employees;
the Merger Agreement places certain restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to the completion of the Merger or the termination of the Merger Agreement. Such restrictions, the waiver of which is subject to the consent of AgEagle, may prevent us from making certain acquisitions, taking certain other specified actions or otherwise pursuing business opportunities during the pendency of the Merger;distribution partners; and
   
matters relating to the Merger (including integration planning) may require substantial commitments of time and resources by our management, which would otherwise have been devoted to other opportunitiesproduct development that may have been beneficial to us as an independent company.does not align with or meet customer needs.

 

The Merger AgreementOur success in the market for the products and services we develop will depend largely on our ability to properly demonstrate their capabilities. Upon demonstration, our platform of systems may not have the capabilities they were designed to have or that we believed they would have. Furthermore, even if we do successfully demonstrate our products’ capabilities, potential customers may be terminated in accordancemore comfortable doing business with its termsa competitor; or may not feel there is a significant need for the products we develop. As a result, significant revenue from our current and the Mergernew product investments may not be completed.achieved for a number of years, if at all.

If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, we could lose our ability to compete in the marketplace.

Our intellectual property and proprietary rights are important to our ability to remain competitive and successful in the development of our products and our business. Patent protection can be limited and not all intellectual property can be patented. We expect to rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret laws as well as confidentiality agreements and procedures, non-competition agreements and other contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property, other proprietary rights and our brand. As we currently do not have any granted patent, trademark or copyright protections, we must rely on trade secrets and nondisclosure agreements, which provide limited protections. Our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by third parties. We may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or other trade secrets by employees or competitors.

Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop technologies and products that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies and products, which could result in decreased revenues. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs to us and substantial diversion of management attention. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property, our competitors could use it to enhance their products. Our inability to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business and financial condition, and the value of our brand and other intangible assets.

Other companies may claim that we infringe their intellectual property, which could materially increase our costs and harm our ability to generate future revenue and profit.

We do not believe that our technologies infringe on the proprietary rights of any third party, however claims of infringement are becoming increasingly common and third parties may assert infringement claims against us. It may be difficult or impossible to identify, prior to receipt of notice from a third party, the trade secrets, patent position or other intellectual property rights of a third party, either in the United States or in foreign jurisdictions. Any such assertion may result in litigation or may require us to obtain a license for the intellectual property rights of third parties. If we are required to obtain licenses to use any third-party technology, we would have to pay royalties, which may significantly reduce any profit on our products. In addition, any such litigation could be expensive and disruptive to its ability to generate revenue or enter into new market opportunities. If any of our products were found to infringe other parties’ proprietary rights and we are unable to come to terms regarding a license with such parties, we may be forced to modify our products to make them non-infringing or to cease production of such products altogether.

13 

 

The completionnature of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the shareholders of the Companyour business involves significant risks and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representationsuncertainties that may not be covered by insurance or indemnification.

We have developed and warranties made by each of the Companysold products and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the shareholders of the Companyservices in circumstances where insurance or indemnification may not be available; for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle shareholdersexample, in connection with the Mergercollection and (y) in connectionanalysis of various types of information. In addition, our products and services raise questions with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listingrespect to issues of shares of the Company’s common stockcivil liberties, intellectual property, trespass, conversion and similar concepts, which may create legal issues. Indemnification to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferredcover potential claims or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger,resulting from the failure of which could resultany technologies that we develop or deploy may be available in certain circumstances but not in others. Currently, the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement. These conditions to the closing of the Mergerunmanned aerial systems industry lacks a formative insurance market. We may not be fulfilledable to maintain insurance to protect against all operational risks and accordingly,uncertainties that our customers confront. Substantial claims resulting from an accident, product failure, or personal injury or property liability arising from our products and services in excess of any indemnity or insurance coverage (or for which indemnity or insurance coverage is not available or is not obtained) could harm our financial condition, cash flows and operating results. Any accident, even if fully covered or insured, could negatively affect our reputation among our customers and the Mergerpublic, and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively.

We may notincur substantial product liability claims relating to our products.

As a manufacturer of UAV products, and with aircraft and aviation sector companies under increased scrutiny, claims could be completed.brought against us if use or misuse of one of our UAV products causes, or merely appears to have caused, personal injury or death. In addition, if the Merger is not completed by March 31, 2018, either we or AgEagledefects in our products may choose notlead to proceed with the Merger,other potential life, health and the parties can mutually decideproperty risks. Any claims against us, regardless of their merit, could severely harm our financial condition, strain our management and other resources. We are unable to terminate the Merger Agreement at any time, before or after shareholder approval. In addition, we or AgEagle may elect to terminate the Merger Agreement in certain other circumstances.

Termination of the Merger Agreement could negatively impact the Company.

In the event the Merger Agreement is terminated, our business may have been adversely impacted by our failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the Merger, and the market price of our common stock might decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the Merger will be completed. If the Merger Agreement is terminated and our board of directors seek another business combination, our shareholders cannot be certain thatpredict if we will be able to find a party willing to offer equivalentobtain or more attractive consideration than the consideration providedmaintain product liability insurance for by the Merger. any products that may be approved for marketing.

 

We willIf we not able to recruit and retain key management, technical and sales personnel, our business would be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Merger is pending.negatively affected.

 

Uncertainty about the effect of the MergerFor our business to be successful, we need to attract and retain highly qualified technical, management and sales personnel. The failure to recruit additional key personnel when needed, with specific qualifications, on acceptable terms and with an ability to maintain positive relationships with our partners, may have an adverse effect on us. These uncertainties may impairmight impede our ability to continue to develop, commercialize and sell our products and services. To the extent the demand for skilled personnel exceeds supply, we could experience higher labor, recruiting and training costs in order to attract and retain such employees. The loss of any members of our management team may also delay or impair achievement of our business objectives and motivate key personnel until the Merger is completed, and could cause partners and others that deal with us to seek to change existingresult in business relationships, cease doing business with us or cause potential new partners to delay doing business with us until the Merger has been successfully completed. Retention of certain employees may be challenging during the pendency of the Merger, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles or compensation structure. If key employees depart because of issues relatingdisruptions due to the uncertaintytime needed for their replacements to be recruited and difficultybecome familiar with our business. We face competition for qualified personnel from other companies with significantly more resources available to them and thus may not be able to attract the level of integration or a desire not to remain with the business,personnel needed for our business following the Merger could be negatively impacted. In addition, the Merger Agreement restricts us from making certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions until the Merger is completed or terminated without the consent of AgEagle. These restrictions may prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the Merger.succeed.

 

 19

We have substantial indebtedness which is secured by substantially all ofIf our assets.proposed marketing efforts are unsuccessful, we may not earn enough revenue to become profitable.

 

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreementfuture growth depends on our gaining market acceptance and note are non-recourseregular production orders for our products and are secured by a first-priority lienservices. Our marketing plan includes attendance at trade shows, making private demonstrations, advertising, promotional materials and advertising campaigns in the Company’s and the subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees the Subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties print and/or assets.broadcast media. In the event we failare not successful in obtaining a significant volume of orders for our products and services, we will face significant obstacles in expanding our business. We cannot give any assurance that our marketing efforts will be successful. If they are not, revenue may not be sufficient to repaycover our debts our creditorsfixed costs and we may enforce their security interestsnot become profitable.

Our operating margins may be negatively impacted by reduction in sales or products sold.

Expectations regarding future sales and foreclose on our assets, which would likely cause any investmentexpenses are largely fixed in the companyshort term. We maintain raw materials and finished goods at a volume we feel is necessary for anticipated distribution and sales. Therefore, we may not be able to become worthless.reduce costs in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfalls between forecasted and actual sales.

 

Current volatile market conditions

14 

We face a significant risk of failure because we cannot accurately forecast our future revenues and significant fluctuations in energy prices may continue indefinitely, negatively affecting our business prospects and viability.operating results.

 

The oil and gas markets are very volatile, and we cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices. Historically, oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. Further declines in the price of oil and natural gas will have a material adverse effect on our planned operations and financial condition. Additionally, the amount of any royalty payment we receive from the production of oil and gas from our oil and gas interests will depend on numerous factors beyond our control.

We are subject to the Continued Listing Criteriarapidly changing nature of the NYSE American and our failure to satisfy these criteria may result in delisting of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American. In order to maintain this listing, we must maintain certain share prices, financial and share distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum amount of shareholders’ equity and a minimum number of public shareholders. In addition to these objective standards, the NYSE American may delist the securities of any issuer if, in its opinion, the issuer’s financial condition and/or operating results appear unsatisfactory; if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of the security has become so reduced as to make continued listing on the NYSE American inadvisable; if the issuer sells or disposes of principal operating assets or ceases to be an operating company; if an issuer fails to comply with the NYSE American’s listing requirements; if an issuer’s common stock sells at what the NYSE American considers a “low selling price” (generally trading below $0.20 per share for an extended period of time) and the issuer fails to correct this via a reverse split of shares after notification by the NYSE American (provided that issuers can also be delisted if any shares of the issuer trade below $0.06 per share); or if any other event occurs or any condition exists which makes continued listing on the NYSE American, in its opinion, inadvisable. As described below, the NYSE American has previously provided us a deficiency letter due to our common stock trading below $0.20 per share.

If the NYSE American delists our common stock, investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of trading market for our securities, reduced liquidity, decreased analyst coverage of our securities, and an inability for us to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.

We are currently not in compliance with NYSE American continued listing standards and if we are unable to maintain compliance with NYSE American continued listing standards, our common stock may be delisted from the NYSE American equities market, which would likely cause the liquidity and market price of our common stock to decline.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American. The NYSE American will consider suspending dealings in, or delisting, securities of an issuer that does not meet its continued listing standards. If we cannot meet the NYSE American continued listing requirements, the NYSE American may delist our common stock, which could have an adverse impact on us and the liquidity and market price of our stock. 

We may be unable to comply with NYSE American continued listing standards. Our business has been and may continue to be affected by worldwide macroeconomic factors, which include uncertainties in the credit and capital markets. External factors that affect our stock price, such as liquidity requirements of our investors, as well as our performance, could impact our market capitalization, revenue and operating results, which, in turn, could affect our ability to comply with the NYSE American’s listing standards. The NYSE American has the ability to suspend trading in our common stock or remove our common stock from listing on the NYSE American if in the opinion of the exchange: (a) the financial condition and/or operating results of the Company appear to be unsatisfactory; or (b) it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of our common stock has become so reduced as to make further dealings on the exchange inadvisable; or (c) we have sold or otherwise disposed of our principal operating assets, or have ceased to be an operating company; or (d) we have failed to comply with our listing agreements with the exchange (which include that we receive additional listing approval from the exchange prior to us issuing any shares of common stock, something we have inadvertently failed to comply with in the past); or (e) any other event shall occur or any condition shall exist which makes further dealings on the exchange unwarranted.

 20

On October 19, 2017, the Company received notice from NYSE Regulation, Inc. that it is not in compliance with certain NYSE American (“NYSE American”) continued listing standards relating to stockholders’ equity. Specifically, the Company is not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(i) (requiring stockholders’ equity of $2.0 million or more if an issuer has reported losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in two of its three most recent fiscal years) of the NYSE American Company Guide (the “Company Guide”).

On November 20, 2017, the Company filed a plan of compliance with the proposed steps the Company will take to regain compliance with all applicable criteria for listing on the NYSE American and in particular Section 1003(a)(i). The plan was based in significant part upon the Merger and the associated financing.

On December 22, 2017, the Company was notified by the NYSE American that NYSE Regulation had accepted the Company’s plan to regain compliance with the NYSE American’s continued listing standards of the Company Guide by April 17, 2019, subject to periodic review by the NYSE American for compliance with the initiatives set forth in the plan. If the Company is not in compliance with the continued listing standards by April 17, 2019, or if the Company does not make progress consistent with the plan during the plan period, the NYSE Regulation staff may initiate delisting proceedings as appropriate.

Additionally, on February 28, 2018, the Company received notification (the “Deficiency Letter”) from the NYSE American that the Company’s shares of common stock have been selling for a low price per share for a substantial period of time. Pursuant to Section 1003(f)(v) of the Company Guide, the NYSE American staff determined that the Company’s continued listing is predicated on it effecting a reverse stock split of its common stock or otherwise demonstrating sustained price improvement within a reasonable period of time, which the staff determined to be until August 28, 2018. The Company’s common stock will continue to be listed on the NYSE American while it attempts to regain compliance with the Listing Standards, subject to the Company’s compliance with other continued listing requirements, as described above. The Deficiency Letter does not affect the Company’s business operations or its Securities and Exchange Commission reporting requirements. 

At the present time, the Company has obtained shareholder approval to effectuate a reverse stock split at a ratio of between one-for-two and one-for-twenty five with such ratio to be determined at the sole discretion of the Board of the Directors of the Company. The Company’s Board of Directors is currently assessing which ratio would best serve the Company’s stockholders while allowing the Company to remain compliant with the NYSE American continued listing requirements.

If we are unable to retain compliance with the NYSE American criteria for continued listing, our common stock would be subject to delisting. A delisting of our common stock could negatively impact us by, among other things, reducing the liquidity and market price of our common stock and reducing the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our common stock, which could negatively impact our ability to raise equity financing. In addition, delisting from the NYSE American might negatively impact our reputation and, as a consequence, our business. Additionally, if we were delisted from the NYSE American and we are not able to list our common stock on another national exchange we will no longer be eligible to use Form S-3 registration statements and will instead be required to file a Form S-1 registration statement for any primary or secondary offerings of our common stock, which would delay our ability to raise funds in the future, may limit the type of offerings of common stock we could undertake, and would increase the expenses of any offering, as, among other things, registration statements on Form S-1 are subject to SEC review and comments whereas take downs pursuant to a previously filed Form S-3 are not.

If we are delisted from the NYSE American, your ability to sell your shares of our common stock would also be limited by the penny stock restrictions, which could further limit the marketability of your shares.

If our common stock is delisted from the NYSE American, it would come within the definition of “penny stock” as defined in the Exchange Act and would be covered by Rule 15g-9 of the Exchange Act. That Rule imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. For transactions covered by Rule 15g-9, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, Rule 15g-9, if it were to become applicable, would affect the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell our securities, and accordingly would affect the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the public market. These additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future.

Until we repay the full amount of our outstanding credit facility, we may continue to have substantial indebtedness, which is secured by substantially all of our assets.  

While our bank sold its rights under our credit facility to the successor lender, and the successor lender has agreed to a transaction in which we can contribute certain of our assets, our shares in Oakridge Energy, and reduce our loan amount from $17,925,000 to a restated note in the original principal amount of $4,500,000, subject to a $1,200,000 discount provided that we repay the successor lender $3,300,000 prior to the original maturity date of November 1, 2017, which has been extended to March 23, 2018 and can be extended to April 30, 2018. In exchange we can retain our Kansas oil and gas assets. Unless and until this transaction closes (which is dependent on the approval of our stockholders), we will remain in default on our obligations, and the successor lender may enforce its rights as secured parties and we will likely lose all of our Kansas assets and may be forced to liquidate the Company.

 21

We are unable to fulfill our obligations under our credit facility which is adversely affecting our business.

As of December 31, 2017, we had total indebtedness of $4,457,347 under the credit facility. Our substantial indebtedness, and the related interest expense, could have important consequences to us, including:

our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, execution of our business strategy, or other general corporate purposes;
being forced to use cash flow to reduce our outstanding balance as a result of an unfavorable borrowing base redetermination;
our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service our indebtedness;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage as compared to our competitors that have less leverage;
our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and to react to competitive pressures and changes in government regulation;
our ability to, or increasing the cost of, refinancing our indebtedness; and
our ability to enter into marketing, hedging, optimization and trading transactions by reducing the number of counterparties with whom we can enter into such transactions as well as the volume of those transactions.

The covenants in our Credit Facility impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us.

The credit facility imposes significant operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries, among other things, to:

incur additional indebtedness and provide additional guarantees;
pay dividends and make other restricted payments;
create or permit certain liens;
use the proceeds from the sales of our oil and gas properties;
use the proceeds from the unwinding of certain financial hedges;
engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and
consolidate, merge, sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries.

The credit facility also contains various affirmative covenants with which we are required to comply. At December 31, 2017, we were not in compliance with certain covenants. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.    

Our 2017 oil and gas reserve report shows a material decline in our estimated reserves, which will have adverse implications to our business.

Our 2017 oil and gas reserve report shows a material decline in our estimated reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil and natural gas reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond our control. For example, estimates of quantities of proved reserves and their PV10 value are affected by changes in crude oil and gas prices, because estimates are based on prevailing prices at the time of their determination. Further, reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in any exact way, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, estimates made by different engineers often vary from one another.

Current volatile market conditions and significant fluctuations in energy prices may continue indefinitely, negatively affecting our business prospects and viability.

The oil and gas markets are very volatile, and we cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices. Historically, oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. Further declines in the price of oil and natural gas will have a material adverse effect on our planned operations and financial condition. Additionally, the amount of any royalty payment we receive from the production of oil and gas from our oil and gas interests will depend on numerous factors beyond our control.

 22

We may continue to incur substantial write-downs of the carrying value of our oil and gas properties, which would adversely impact our earnings.

We review the carrying value of our oil and gas properties under the full cost method of accounting. Under the full cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is (a) the present value of future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil & gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil & gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of 10 percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditionsplus (b) the cost of properties not being amortizedplus (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortizedless (d) income tax effects related to differences between book and tax basis of properties. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an un-weighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements. 

Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) in the statement of operations. The ceiling calculation is performed quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.

Future conditions might require us to make write-downs in our assets, which would adversely affect our balance sheet and results of operations.

We review our long-lived tangible and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. We also test our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually on December 31 of each year, or when events or changes in the business environment indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit may exceed its fair value. If conditions in any of the businesses in which we compete weremakes it difficult to deteriorate,accurately forecast our revenues and operating results. Furthermore, we could determine that certain ofexpect our assets were impairedrevenues and we would then be requiredoperating results to write-off all or a portion of our costs for such assets. Any such significant write-offs would adversely affect our balance sheet and results of operations.

Risks Associated with our Industry

Oil and gas prices are volatile. Future price volatility may negatively impact cash flows which could result in an inability to cover our operating and/or capital expenditures.

Our future revenues, profitability, future growth and the carrying value of our properties depend substantially on the prices we realize for our oil and gas production. Our realized prices may also affect the amount of cash flow available for operating and/or capital expenditures and our ability to borrow and raise additional capital.

Oil and gas prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in or perceptions regarding supply and demand. Historically, the markets for oil and gas have been volatile, and they are likely to continue to be volatilefluctuate in the future. Amongfuture due to a number of factors, including the factors that can cause this volatility are:following:

 

commodities speculators;the timing of sales of our products;
 local, national and worldwide economic conditions;
unexpected delays in introducing new products;
 worldwide or regional demand for energy, which is affected by economic conditions;
the domesticincreased expenses, whether related to sales and foreign supply of oil and gas;
weather conditions;
natural disasters;
acts of terrorism and war;
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxation;
political and economic conditions in oil and gas producing countries, including those in the Middle East and South America;
impact of the U.S. dollar exchange rates on oil and gas prices;
the availability of refining capacity;
actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries,marketing, or OPEC, and other state controlled oil and gas companies relating to oil and gas price and production controls;administration; and
 the price and availability
costs related to possible acquisitions of other fuels.businesses.

 

It is impossible to predict oil and gas price movements with certainty. A drop in oil and gas pricesRapid technological changes may not only decrease our future revenues on a per unit basis but also may reduce the amount of oil and gas that we can produce economically. A substantial or extended decline in oil and gas prices would materially and adversely affect our future business enough to potentially force us to cease our business operations. In addition, our reserves, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to finance and execute planned capital expenditures will also suffer in such a price decline.

 23

Declining economic conditions and worsening geopolitical conditions could negatively impact our business.

Our operations are affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions. Markets in the United States and elsewhere have been experiencing volatility and disruption for more than 5 years, due in part to the financial stresses affecting the liquidity of the banking system and the financial markets generally. The consequences of a potential or prolonged recession may include a lower level of economic activity, decreasing demand for petroleum products and uncertainty regarding energy prices and the capital and commodity markets.

In addition, actual and attempted terrorist attacks in the United States, Middle East, Southeast Asia and Europe, and war or armed hostilities in the Middle East, the Persian Gulf, North Africa, Iran, North Korea or elsewhere, or the fear of such events, could further exacerbate the volatility and disruption to the financial markets and economies.

While the ultimate outcome and impact of the current economic conditions cannot be predicted, a lower level of economic activity might result in a decline in energy consumption, which may materially adversely affect the pricemarket acceptance of oilour products and gas, our revenues, liquidity and future growth.  Instability in the financial markets, as a result of recession or otherwise, also maycould adversely affect the cost of capital and our ability to raise capital. 

The threat and impact of terrorist attacks, cyber attacks or similar hostilities may adversely impact our operations.

We cannot assess the extent of either the threat or the potential impact of future terrorist attacks on the energy industry in general, and on us in particular, either in the short-term or in the long-term. Uncertainty surrounding such hostilities may affect our operations in unpredictable ways, including the possibility that infrastructure facilities, including pipelines and gathering systems, production facilities, processing plants and refineries, could be targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror, a cyber attack or electronic security breach, or an act of war.

Improvements in or new discoveries of alternative energy technologies could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Because our operations depend on the demand for oil and used oil, any improvement in or new discoveries of alternative energy technologies (such as wind, solar, geothermal, fuel cells and biofuels) that increase the use of alternative forms of energy and reduce the demand for oil, gas and oil and gas related products could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The oilmarket in which we compete is subject to technological changes, introduction of new products, change in customer demands and natural gasevolving industry standards. Our future success will depend upon our ability to keep pace with technological developments and to timely address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers by supporting existing and new technologies and by developing and introducing enhancements to our current products and new products. We may not be successful in developing and marketing enhancements to our products that will respond to technological change, evolving industry standards or customer requirements. In addition, we may experience difficulties internally or in conjunction with key vendors and partners that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and sale of such enhancements and such enhancements may not adequately meet the requirements of the market and may not achieve any significant degree of market acceptance. If release dates of our new products or enhancements are delayed or, if when released, they fail to achieve market acceptance, our business, involves numerous uncertaintiesoperating results and operating risks that can prevent us from realizing profits and can cause substantial losses.financial condition may be adversely affected.

 

Our development, exploitationproducts are subject to regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration (the “FAA”).

In August 2016, regulations from the FAA relating to the commercial use of UAVs in the United States became law. As a result, users of systems like ours are only required to take a knowledge exam at an approved FAA testing station similar to an automobile driver’s license exam. Prior to the new law, users had to hold a pilot’s license, have an observer present and exploration activitiesfile various documents before flights. In the event new FAA rules or regulations are promulgated or current rules are revised that may negatively affect commercial usage of our UAVs, such rules and laws could adversely disrupt our operations and overall sales.

Our future results may be unsuccessful for many reasons,affected by various legal and regulatory proceedings and legal compliance risks, including weather, cost overruns, equipment shortagesthose involving product liability, antitrust, intellectual property, environmental, regulations of the FAA, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and mechanical difficulties. Moreover, the successful drilling of a well does not ensure a profit on investment. A variety of factors, both geological and market-related, can cause a well to become uneconomicalother anti-bribery, anti-corruption, or only marginally economical. In addition to their cost, unsuccessful wells can hurt our efforts to replace reserves.other matters.

 

The oiloutcome of any future legal proceedings may differ from our expectations because the outcomes of litigation, including regulatory matters, are often difficult to reliably predict. Various factors or developments can lead us to change current estimates of liabilities and natural gas business involves a varietyrelated insurance receivables where applicable; or make such estimates for matters previously not susceptible of operating risks, including:

unexpected operational events and/or conditions;
reductions in oil and natural gas prices;
limitations in the market for oil and natural gas;
adverse weather conditions;
facility or equipment malfunctions;
title problems;
oil and gas quality issues;
pipe, casing, cement or pipeline failures;
natural disasters;
fires, explosions, blowouts, surface cratering, pollution and other risks or accidents;
environmental hazards,reasonable estimates, such as oil spills, pipeline ruptures and discharges of toxic gases;
compliance with environmental and other governmental requirements; and
uncontrollable flows of oil or natural gas or well fluids.

If we experience any of these problems, it could affect well bores, gathering systems and processing facilities, which could adversely affect our ability to conduct operations. We could also incur substantial losses as a result of:

injurysignificant judicial ruling or loss of life;

 24

severe damage to and destruction of property, natural resources and equipment;
pollution and other environmental damage;
clean-up responsibilities;
regulatory investigation and penalties;
suspension of our operations; and
repairs to resume operations.

Because we use third-party drilling contractors to drill our wells, we may not realize the full benefit of worker compensation laws in dealing with their employees. Our insurance does not protect us against all operational risks. We do not carry business interruption insurance at levels that would provide enough funds for us to continue operating without access to other funds. For some risks, we may not obtain insurance if we believe the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Ifjudgment, a significant accidentsettlement, significant regulatory developments or other event occurs and is not fully covered by insurance, itchanges in applicable law. A future adverse ruling, settlement or unfavorable development could impact our operations enough to force us to cease our operations.

Approximately 85.3% of our total proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 consist of undeveloped reserves, and those reserves may not ultimately be developed or produced.

Our estimated total proved PV10 (present value) before tax of reserves as of December 31, 2017 was $1.5 million, versus $3.4 million as of December 31, 2016.  Of the 0.5 million BOE of total proved reserves, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped.

Assuming we can obtain adequate capital resources, we plan to develop and produce all of our proved reserves, but ultimately some of these reserves may not be developed or produced. Furthermore, not all of our undeveloped or developed non-producing reserves may be producedresult in the time periods we have planned, at the costs we have budgeted, or at all. For further information please see the disclosures in “Note 14 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)” to the Financial Statements included herein.

Because we face uncertainties in estimating proved recoverable reserves, you should not place undue reliance on such reserve information.

Our reserve estimates and the future net cash flows attributable to those reserves at December 31, 2017 were prepared by Cobb & Associates, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant.  There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and cash flows from such reserves, including factors beyond our control and the control of these independent consultants and engineers. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gascharges that can be economically extracted, which cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of an estimate of quantities of reserves, or of cash flows attributable to these reserves, is a function of the available data, assumptions regarding future oil and gas prices, expenditures for future development and exploitation activities, and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Reserves and future cash flows may also be subject to material downward or upward revisions based upon production history, development and exploitation activities and oil and gas prices. Actual future production, revenue, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses, quantities of recoverable reserves and value of cash flows from those reserves may vary significantly from the assumptions and estimates in our reserve reports. Any significant variance from these assumptions to actual figures could greatly affect our estimates of reserves, the economically recoverable quantities of oil and gas attributable to any particular group of properties, the classification of reserves based on risk of recovery, and estimates of the future net cash flows. In addition, reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserves and cash flows based on the same available data. The estimated quantities of proved reserves and the discounted present value of future net cash flows attributable to those reserves included in this report were prepared by Cobb & Associates, Inc. in accordance with rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and are not intended to represent the fair market value of such reserves.

The present value of future net cash flows from our proved reserves is not necessarily the same as the current market value of our estimated reserves. We base the estimated discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves on prices and costs. However, actual future net cash flows from our oil and gas properties also will be affected by factors such as:

geological conditions;
assumptions governing future oil and gas prices;
amount and timing of actual production;
availability of funds;
future operating and development costs;
actual prices we receive for oil and gas;
changes in government regulations and taxation; and
capital costs of drilling new wells

 25

The timing of both our production and our incurrence of expenses in connection with the development and production of our properties will affect the timing of actual future net cash flows from proved reserves, and thus their actual present value. In addition, the 10% discount factor we use when calculating discounted future net cash flows may not be the most appropriate discount factor based on interest rates in effect from time to time and risks associated with our business or the oil and gas industry in general.

The differential between the New York Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX, or other benchmark price of oil and gas and the wellhead price we receive could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations financial condition andor cash flows.flows in any particular period. We are not currently involved in or subject to any such legal or regulatory proceedings, but we cannot guarantee that such proceedings may not occur in the future.

 

The prices

15 

If we do not receive the governmental approvals necessary for the sales or export of our products, or if our products are not compliant in other countries, our sales may be negatively impacted. Similarly, if our suppliers and partners do not receive government approvals necessary to export their products or designs to us, our revenues may be negatively impacted and we may fail to implement our growth strategy.

A license may be required in the future to initiate marketing activities. We may also be required to obtain a specific export license for any hardware exported. We may not be able to receive all the required permits and licenses for which we may apply in the future. If we do not receive the required permits for which we apply, our revenues may be negatively impacted. In addition, if government approvals required under these laws and regulations are not obtained, or if authorizations previously granted are not renewed, our ability to export our products could be negatively impacted, which may have a negative impact on our revenues and a potential material negative impact on our financial results.

We may pursue additional strategic transactions in the future, which could be difficult to implement, disrupt our business or change our business profile significantly.

We intend to consider additional potential strategic transactions, which could involve acquisitions of businesses or assets, joint ventures or investments in businesses, products or technologies that expand, complement or otherwise relate to our current or future business. We may also consider, from time to time, opportunities to engage in joint ventures or other business collaborations with third parties to address particular market segments. Should our relationships fail to materialize into significant agreements, or should we receive for our oil production in Texas, Coloradofail to work efficiently with these companies, we may lose sales and Kansas are typically based on a discount to the relevant benchmark prices,marketing opportunities and its business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

These activities, if successful, create risks such as, NYMEX, that are used for calculating hedge positions. The prices we receive foramong others: (i) the need to integrate and manage the businesses and products acquired with our natural gas productionown business and products; (ii) additional demands on our resources, systems, procedures and controls; (iii) disruption of our ongoing business; (iv) potential unknown or unquantifiable liabilities associated with the target company; and (v) diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. Moreover, these transactions could involve: (a) substantial investment of funds or financings by issuance of debt or equity securities; (b) substantial investment with respect to technology transfers and operational integration; and (c) the acquisition or disposition of product lines or businesses. Also, such activities could result in Colorado is based upon local market conditions but generally we receive a discountone-time charges and expenses and have the potential to Henry Hub. The difference betweeneither dilute the benchmark price and the price we receive is called a differential.  We cannot accurately predict oil and gas differentials. In recent years for example, production increases from competing North American producers, in conjunction with limited refining and pipeline capacity have widened this differential. Recent economic conditions, including volatilityinterests of our existing shareholders or result in the priceissuance of, oilor assumption of debt. Such acquisitions, investments, joint ventures or other business collaborations may involve significant commitments of financial and gas,other resources. Any such activities may not be successful in generating revenue, income or other returns, and any resources we committed to such activities will not be available to us for other purposes. Moreover, if we are unable to access the capital markets on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to consummate acquisitions, or may have resultedto do so on the basis of a less than optimal capital structure. Our inability to take advantage of growth opportunities or address risks associated with acquisitions or investments in both increasesbusinesses may negatively affect our operating results.

Additionally, any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets acquired in an acquisition or in an investment, or charges to earnings associated with any acquisition or investment activity, may materially reduce our earnings. Future acquisitions or joint ventures may not result in their anticipated benefits and decreaseswe may not be able to properly integrate acquired products, technologies or businesses with our existing products and operations or successfully combine personnel and cultures. Failure to do so could deprive us of the intended benefits of those acquisitions.

Breaches of network or information technology security could have an adverse effect on our business.

Cyber-attacks or other breaches of network or IT security may cause equipment failures or disrupt our systems and operations. We may be subject to attempts to breach the security of our networks and IT infrastructure through cyber-attack, malware, computer viruses and other means of unauthorized access. The potential liabilities associated with these events could exceed the insurance coverage we maintain. Our inability to operate our facilities as a result of such events, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses or loss of market share to other competitors in the differential betweendefense electronics market. In addition, a failure to protect the benchmark price for oilprivacy of customer and gas andemployee confidential data against breaches of network or IT security could result in damage to our reputation. To date, we have not been subject to cyber-attacks or other cyber incidents which, individually or in the wellhead price we receive.  These fluctuations could haveaggregate, resulted in a material adverse effect on our business, operating results of operations,and financial condition and cash flows by decreasing the proceeds we receive for our oil and gas production in comparison to what we would receive if not for the differential.  condition.

 

Drilling wells is speculative, and any material inaccuracies in our forecasted drilling costs, estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect our business.

16 

 

Developing and exploring for oil and gas involves a high degree of operational and financial risk, which precludes definitive statements as to the time required and costs involved in reaching certain objectives. The budgeted costs of drilling, completing and operating wells are often exceeded and can increase significantly when drilling costs rise due to a tightening in the supply of various types of oil and gas field equipment and related services. Drilling may be unsuccessful for many reasons, including geological conditions, weather, cost overruns, equipment shortages and mechanical difficulties. Moreover, the successful drilling of an oil and gas well does not ensure a profit on investment. Exploratory wells bear a much greater risk of loss than development wells. A variety of factors, both geological and market-related, can cause a well to become uneconomical or only marginally economic. Our initial drilling and development sites, and any potential additional sites that may be developed, require significant additional exploration and development, regulatory approval and commitments of resources prior to commercial development. If our actual drilling and development costs are significantly more than our estimated costs, we may not be able to continue our business operations as proposed and would be forced to modify our plan of operation.

Developmentpreparation of our reserves, when established, may not occur as scheduled and the actual results may not be as anticipated. Drilling activity and lack of access to economically acceptable capital may result in downward adjustments in reserves or higher than anticipated costs. Our estimates will be based on various assumptions, including assumptions over which we have control and assumptions required by the SEC relating to oil and gas prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds. We have control over our operations that affect, among other things, acquisitions and dispositions of properties, availability of funds,financial statements involves use of applicable technologies, hydrocarbon recovery efficiency, drainage volume and production decline rates that are part of these estimates, judgments and assumptions, and any varianceour financial statements may be materially affected if our estimates prove to be inaccurate.

Financial statements prepared in our operationsaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States require the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affects these items within our control mayaffect the reported amounts. Different estimates, judgments, and assumptions reasonably could be used that would have a material effect on reserves.  The process of estimating our oilthe financial statements, and gas reserves is extremely complex, and requires significant decisionschanges in these estimates, judgments, and assumptions are likely to occur from period to period in the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineeringfuture. These estimates, judgments, and economic data for each reservoir. Our estimates may not be reliable enough to allow usassumptions are inherently uncertain, and, if they prove to be successful in our intended business operations. Our actual production, revenues, taxes, development expenditures and operating expenseswrong, then we face the risk that charges to income will likely vary from those anticipated. These variances may be material.required.

 

Unless we replaceOur results could be adversely affected by natural disasters, public health crises, political crises, or other catastrophic events.

Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, earthquakes, and other adverse weather and climate conditions; unforeseen public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics; political crises, such as terrorist attacks, war, labor unrest, and other political instability; or other catastrophic events, such as disasters occurring at our oilmanufacturing facilities, could disrupt our operations or the operations of one or more of our vendors. In particular, these types of events could impact our product supply chain from or to the impacted region and gas reserves,could impact our reservesability to operate. In addition, these types of events could negatively impact consumer spending in the impacted regions. Disasters occurring at our manufacturing facilities could impact our reputation and production willour customers’ perception of our brands. To the extent any of these events occur, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.

Worldwide and domestic economic trends and financial market conditions, including an economic decline which wouldin the agricultural industry, may adversely affect our cash flows and income.

Unless we conduct successful development, exploitation and exploration activities or acquire properties containing proved reserves, our proved reserves will decline as those reserves are produced. Producing oil and gas reservoirs generally are characterized by declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. Our future oil and gas production, and, therefore our cash flow and income, are highly dependent on our success in efficiently developing and exploiting our current reserves and economically finding or acquiring additional recoverable reserves. We may be unable to make such acquisitions because we are:

unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable purchase contracts with them;
unable to obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically acceptable terms; or
outbid by competitors.

If we are unable to develop, exploit, find or acquire additional reserves to replace our current and future production, our cash flow and income will decline as production declines, until our existing properties would be incapable of sustaining commercial production.

 26

In order to exploit successfully our current oil and gas leases and others that we acquire in the future, we will need to generate significant amounts of capital.

The oil and gas exploration, development and production business is a capital-intensive undertaking. In order for us to be successful in acquiring, investigating, developing, and producing oil and gas from our current mineral leases and other leases that we may acquire in the future, we will need to generate an amount of capital in excess of that generated from our results of operations. In order to generate that additional capital, we may need to obtain an expanded debt facility and issue additional shares of our equity securities. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in either obtaining that expanded debt facility or issuing additional shares of our equity securities, and our inability to generate the needed additional capital may have a material adverse effect on our prospects and financial results of operations. If we are able to issue additional equity securities in order to generate such additional capital, then those issuances may occur at prices that represent discounts to our trading price, and will dilute the percentage ownership interest of those persons holding our shares prior to such issuances. Unless we are able to generate additional enterprise value with the proceeds of the sale of our equity securities, those issuances may adversely affect the value of our shares that are outstanding prior to those issuances.

A significant portion of our potential future reserves and our business plan depend upon secondary recovery techniques to establish production. There are significant risks associated with such techniques.operating performance.

 

We anticipate thatintend to distribute in a significant portionnumber of our future reservescountries and derive revenues from both inside and outside the United States. We expect our business plan will be associated with secondary recovery projectssubject to global competition and may be adversely affected by factors in the United States and other countries that are eitherbeyond our control, such as disruptions in financial markets, economic downturns in the early stageform of implementationeither contained or are scheduled for implementation subject to availability of capital. We anticipate that secondarywidespread recessionary conditions, elevated unemployment levels, sluggish or uneven recovery, will affect our reserves and our business plan, andin specific countries or regions, or in the exact project initiation dates and, by the very nature of water flood operations, the exact completion dates of such projects are uncertain. In addition, the reserves and our business plan associated with these secondary recovery projects, as with any reserves, are estimates only, as the success of any development project, including these water flood projects, cannot be ascertainedagricultural industry; social, political or labor conditions in advance. If we are not successful in developing a significant portion of our reserves associated with secondary recovery methods, then the project may be uneconomicspecific countries or generate less cash flow and reserves than we had estimated prior to investing the capital. Risks associated with secondary recovery techniques include, but are not limited to, the following:

higher than projected operating costs;
lower-than-expected production;
longer response times;
higher costs associated with obtaining capital;
unusual or unexpected geological formations;
fluctuations in oil and gas prices;
regulatory changes;
shortages of equipment; and
lack of technical expertise.

If any of these risks occur, it could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Any acquisitions we complete are subject to considerable risk.

Even if we make acquisitions that we believe are good for our business, all acquisitions involve potential risks, including, among other things:

the validity of our assumptions about reserves, future production, revenues and costs, including synergies;
an inability to integrate successfully the businesses we acquire;
a decrease in our liquidity by using our available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;
a significant increase in our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions;
the assumption of unknown liabilities, losses or costs for which we are not indemnified or for which our indemnity is inadequate;
the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;
an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage the acquired properties or assets;
the incurrence of other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges;
unforeseen difficulties encountered in operating in new geographic or geological areas; and
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.

Our decision to acquire a property will depend in part on the evaluation of data obtained from production reports and engineering studies, geophysical and geological analyses and seismicregions; natural and other information, the results of which are often incomplete or inconclusive.

Our reviews of acquired properties can be inherently incomplete because it is not always feasible to perform an in-depth review of the individual properties involved in each acquisition. Even a detailed review of records and properties may not necessarily reveal existing or potential problems, nor will it permit a buyer to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies and potential. Inspections may not always be performed on every well, and environmental problems, such as ground water contamination, plugging or orphaned well liability are not necessarily observable even when an inspection is undertaken.

 27

We must obtain governmental permits and approvals for drilling operations, which can result in delays indisasters affecting our operations be a costlyor our customers and time consuming process, and result in restrictions on our operations.

Regulatory authorities exercise considerable discretionsuppliers; or adverse changes in the timingavailability and scopecost of permit issuancescapital, interest rates, tax rates, or regulations in the regionsjurisdictions in which we operate. Compliance with the requirements imposed by these authorities can be costly and time consuming and may result in delaysUnfavorable global or regional economic conditions, including an economic decline in the commencement or continuation ofagricultural industry, could adversely impact our exploration or production operations and/or fines. Regulatory or legal actions in the future may materially interfere with our operations or otherwise have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, we are often required to prepare and present to federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the effect or impact that a proposed project may have on the environment, threatened and endangered species, and cultural and archaeological artifacts. Accordingly, the permits we need may not be issued, or if issued, may not be issued in a timely fashion, or may involve requirements that restrict our ability to conduct our operations or to do so profitably.

Due to our lack of geographic diversification, adverse developments in our operating areas would materially affect our business.

We currently only lease and operate oil and gas properties located in Kansas. As a result of this concentration, we may be disproportionately exposed to the impact of delays or interruptions of production from these properties caused by significant governmental regulation, transportation capacity constraints, curtailment of production, natural disasters, adverse weather conditions or other events which impact this area.

We depend on a small number of customers for all, or a substantial amount of our sales. If these customers reduce the volumes of oil and gas they purchase from us, our revenue and cash flow will decline to the extent we are not able to find new customers for our production.

In Kansas, we sell oil to Coffeyville Resources. There are approximately six potential purchasers of oil in Kansas. If a key purchaser were to reduce the volume of oil it purchases from us, our revenue and cash available for operations will decline to the extent we are not able to find new customers to purchase our production at equivalent prices.

We are not the operator and we have limited control over the activities on those properties.

We are not the operator of our Mississippian Project, and our dependence on the operator of this project limits our ability to influence or control the operation or future development of this project. Such limitations could materially adversely affect the realization of our targeted returns on capital related to exploration, drilling or production activities and lead to unexpected future costs.

We may suffer losses or incur liability for events for which we or the operator of a property have chosen not to obtain insurance.

Our operations are subject to hazards and risks inherent in producing and transporting oil and gas, such as fires, natural disasters, explosions, pipeline ruptures, spills, and acts of terrorism, all of which can result in the loss of hydrocarbons, environmental pollution, personal injury claims and other damage to our and others’ properties. As protection against operating hazards, we maintain insurance coverage against some, but not all, potential losses. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. As a result of market conditions, existing insurance policies may not be renewed and other desirable insurance may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The occurrence of an event that is not covered, or not fully covered, by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our business dependsFor certain of the components included in part on processing facilities owned by others. Any limitationour products there are a limited number of suppliers we can rely upon and if we are unable to obtain these components when needed we could experience delays in the availability of those facilities could interfere with our ability to market our oil and gas production and could harm our business.

The marketabilitymanufacturing of our oilproducts and gas production will depend in part on the availability, proximity and capacity of pipelines and oil and gas processing facilities. The amount of oil and gas that can be produced and sold is subject to curtailment in certain circumstances, such as pipeline interruptions due to scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, excessive pressure, physical damage or lack of available capacity on such systems. The curtailments arising from these and similar circumstances may last from a few days to several months. In many cases, we will be provided only with limited, if any, notice as to when these circumstances will arise and their duration. Any significant curtailment in pipeline capacity or the capacity of processing facilities could significantly reduce our ability to market our oil and gas production and could materially harm our business.

Cost and availability of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and other services could adversely affect our ability to execute on a timely basis our development, exploitation and exploration plans.

Shortages or an increase in cost of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies or personnel could delay or interrupt our operations, which could impact our financial condition and results of operations. Drilling activity in the geographic areas in which we conduct drilling activities may increase, which would lead to increases in associated costs, including those related to drilling rigs, equipment, supplies and personnel and the services and products of other vendors to the industry. Increased drilling activity in these areas may also decrease the availability of rigs. We do not have any contracts for drilling rigs and drilling rigs may not be readily available when we need them. Drilling and other costs may increase further and necessary equipment and services may not be available to us at economical prices.

 28

Our exposure to possible leasehold defects and potential title failure could materially adversely impact our ability to conduct drilling operations.

We obtain the right and access to properties for drilling by obtaining oil and gas leases either directly from the hydrocarbon owner, or through a third party that owns the lease. The leases may be taken or assigned to us without title insurance. There is a risk of title failure with respect to such leases, and such title failures could materially adversely impact our business by causing us to be unable to access properties to conduct drilling operations.

Our reserves are subject to the risk of depletion because many of our leases are in mature fields that have produced large quantities of oil and gas to date.

A significant portion of our current operations are located in or near established fields in Kansas. As a result, many of our leases are in, or directly offset, areas that have produced large quantities of oil and gas to date.  As such, our reserves may be negatively impacted by offsetting wells or previously drilled wells, which could significantly harm our business.

Our lease ownership may be diluted due to financing strategies we may employ in the future.

To accelerate our development efforts we may take on working interest partners who will contribute to the costs of drilling and completion operations and then share in any cash flow derived from production. In addition, we may in the future, due to a lack of capital or other strategic reasons, establish joint venture partnerships or farm out all or part of our development efforts. These economic strategies may have a dilutive effect on our lease ownership and could significantly reduce our operating revenues.

We are subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental regulations, which can adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.

Development, production and sale of oil and gas in the United States are subject to extensive laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations. We may be required to make large expenditures to comply with environmental and other governmental regulations. Matters subject to regulation include, but are not limited to:

location and density of wells;
the handling of drilling fluids and obtaining discharge permits for drilling operations;
accounting for and payment of royalties on production from state, federal and Indian lands;
bonds for ownership, development and production of oil and gas properties;
transportation of oil and gas by pipelines;
operation of wells and reports concerning operations; and
taxation.

Under these laws and regulations, we could be liable for personal injuries, property damage, oil and gas spills, discharge of hazardous materials, remediation and clean-up costs and other environmental damages. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in the suspension or termination of our operations and subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties. Moreover, these laws and regulations could change in ways that substantially increase our costs. Accordingly, any of these liabilities, penalties, suspensions, terminations or regulatory changes could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations enough to possibly force us to cease our business operations.

Our operations may expose us to significant costs and liabilities with respect to environmental, operational safety and other matters.

We may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of environmental and safety requirements applicable to our oil and gas production activities. We may also be exposed to the risk of costs associated with Kansas Corporation Commission requirements to plug orphaned and abandoned wells on our oil and gas leases from wells previously drilled by third parties. In addition, we may indemnify sellers or lessors of oil and gas properties for environmental liabilities they or their predecessors may have created. These costs and liabilities could arise under a wide range of federal, state and local environmental and safety laws and regulations, including regulations and enforcement policies, which have tended to become increasingly strict over time. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs, liens and to a lesser extent, issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations. In addition, claims for damages to persons or property may result from environmental and other impacts of our operations.

 29

Strict, joint and several liability may be imposed under certain environmental laws, which could cause us to become liable for the conduct of others or for consequences of our own actions that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time those actions were taken. New laws, regulations or enforcement policies could be more stringent and impose unforeseen liabilities or significantly increase compliance costs. If we are not able to recover the resulting costs through insurance or increased revenues, our ability to operate effectively could be adversely affected.

 

We operateacquire most of the components for the manufacture of our products from suppliers and subcontractors. We have not entered into any agreements or arrangements with any potential suppliers or subcontractors. Suppliers of some of the components may require us to place orders with significant lead-times to assure supply in a highly competitive environmentaccordance with its manufacturing requirements. Our present lack of working capital may cause us to delay the placement of such orders and our competitors may have greater resources than do we.

The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive and we compete with other companies, many of which are larger and have greater financial, technological, human and other resources. Many of these companies not only explore for and produce crude oil and gas but also carry on refining operations and market petroleum and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis. Such companiesresult in delays in supply. Delays in supply may be able to pay more for productive oil and gas properties and exploratory prospects or define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or human resources permit. In addition, such companies may have a greater ability to continue exploration activities during periods of low oil and gas market prices. Our ability to acquire additional properties and to discover reserves in the future will be dependent uponsignificantly hurt our ability to evaluatefulfill our contractual obligations and select suitable propertiesmay significantly hurt our business and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. Ifresult of operations. In addition, we are unable to compete, our operating results and financial position may be adversely affected.

Risks Associated with our Stock

We have ceased paying dividends on our Series A preferred stock, causing the trading price of the preferred stock to dramatically decline

On November 4, 2015, we announced that we would not be declaring the monthly dividend for the month of November 2015 on our 10.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock in order to preserve our cash resources. We have not declared the monthly dividend since. The failure to declare and pay monthly dividends on our preferred stock caused its trading price to decline substantially.

We do not expect to pay dividends to holders of our common stock because of the terms of our debt facility, and our need to reinvest cash flow from operations in our business.

It is unlikely that we will pay any dividends to the holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. The terms of our debt facility require that the lender approve any such distributions, and the lender is unlikely to provide that consent so long as we have significant unpaid indebtedness outstanding.

 30

We have derivative securities currently outstanding and we may issue derivative securities in the future. Exercise of the derivatives will cause dilution to existing and new stockholders.

The exercise of our outstanding options and warrants, will cause additional shares of common stock to be issued, resulting in dilution to our existing and future common stockholders

We have the ability to issue additional shares of our common stock and preferred stock without asking for stockholder approval, which could cause your investment to be diluted.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize the board of directors to issue up to 250,000,000 shares of common stock and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock.   The power of the board of directors to issue shares of common stock, preferred stock or warrants or options to purchase shares of common stock or preferred stock is generally not subject to shareholder approval.  Accordingly, any additional issuance of our common stock, or preferred stock that may be convertible into common stock, or debt instruments that may be convertible into common or preferred stock, may have the effect of diluting one’s investment.

Although our common stock is traded on the NYSE American and our Series A preferred stock is traded on the OTC PINK, daily trading volumes are small making it difficult for investors to sell their shares.

Our common stock and our Series A preferred stock trade under the symbol “ENRJ,” and “ENRJP,” respectively but trading volume has been minimal. Therefore, the market for our common stock is limited. The trading price of our stock could be subject to wide fluctuations. Investors may not be able to purchase additional shares or sell their shares within the time frame or at a price they desire.continue to obtain such components from these suppliers on satisfactory commercial terms. Disruptions of its manufacturing operations would ensue if we were required to obtain components from alternative sources, which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

17 

We indemnify our officers and directors against liability to us and our security holders, and such indemnification could increase our operating costs.

Our bylaws allow us to indemnify our officers and directors against claims associated with carrying out the duties of their offices. Our bylaws also allow us to reimburse them for the costs of certain legal defenses. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our officers, directors or control persons, the SEC has advised that such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.

Risks Associated with Our Capital Stock

One of our stockholders beneficially owns a significant percentage of our outstanding capital stock and will have the ability to control our affairs.

Our Chairman of the Board and President, Bret Chilcott, currently owns approximately 46.2% of our issued and outstanding capital stock. By virtue of his holdings, he may have significant influence over the election of the members of our board of directors, our management and our affairs, and may make it difficult for us to consummate corporate transactions such as mergers, consolidations or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets that may be favorable from our standpoint or that of our other stockholders.

The market price of our common stock and Series A preferred stocksecurities may be volatile and you may not be ablefluctuate in a way that is disproportionate to resell your shares at a favorable price.our operating performance.

 

RegardlessOur securities may experience substantial volatility as a result of whether an active tradinga number of factors, including, among others:

sales or potential sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock;
announcements about us or about our competitors or new product introductions;
developments concerning our product manufacturers;
the loss or unanticipated underperformance of our global distribution channel;
litigation and other developments relating to our patents or other proprietary rights or those of our competitors;
conditions in the UAV industry;
governmental regulation and legislation;
variations in our anticipated or actual operating results;
changes in securities analysts’ estimates of our performance, or our failure to meet analysts’ expectations;
foreign currency values and fluctuations; and
overall political and economic conditions.

Many of these factors are beyond our control. The stock markets have historically experienced substantial price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market for our stock develops,and industry factors could reduce the market price of our stock may be volatile and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you paid for such shares. Many factors beyond our control, including but not limited to the following factors could affect our stock price:

our operating and financial performance and prospects;
quarterly variations in the rate of growth of our financial indicators, such as net income or loss per share, net income or loss and revenues;
changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports by analysts about us or the exploration and production industry;
potentially limited liquidity;
actual or anticipated variations in our reserve estimates and quarterly operating results;
changes in oil and gas prices;
sales of our common stock by significant stockholders and future issuances of our common stock;
increases in our cost of capital;
changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings and enforcement and legal actions;
commencement of or involvement in litigation;
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
general market conditions, including fluctuations in and the occurrence of events or trends affecting the price of oil and gas; and
domestic and international economic, legal and regulatory factors unrelated to our performance.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation, restated bylaws and Nevada Law contain provisions that could discourage an acquisition or change of control of us.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock and common stock without stockholder approval. The election by our board of directors to issue Series A preferred stock, and any future election to issue more preferred stock, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. In addition, provisions of the articles of incorporation and bylaws could also make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. Furthermore, Nevada’s “Combination with Interested Stockholders’ Statute” and its “Control Share Acquisition Statute” may have the effect in the future of delaying or making it more difficult to effect a change in control of us.

These statutory anti-takeover measures may have certain negative consequences, including an effect on the abilitysecurities, regardless of our stockholders or other individuals to (i) change the composition of the incumbent board of directors; (ii) benefit from certain transactions which are opposed by the incumbent board of directors; and (iii) make a tender offer or attempt to gain control of us, even if such attempt were beneficial to us and our stockholders. Since such measures may also discourage the accumulations of large blocks of our common stock by purchasers whose objective is to seek control of us or have such common stock repurchased by us or other persons at a premium, these measures could also depress the market price of our common stock. Accordingly, our stockholders may be deprived of certain opportunities to realize the “control premium” associated with take-over attempts.actual operating performance.

 

 31

18 

We have no plans to pay dividends on our common stock. You may not receive funds without selling your stock.

 

We do not anticipate payingintend to pay cash dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. will be your sole source of gain.

We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to financefund the expansiondevelopment and growth of our business. OurIn addition, the terms of existing and future dividend policy with regard to our common stock is withindebt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, from the discretionsale of our boardCommon Stock will be your sole source of directorsgain for the foreseeable future.

Provisions in our articles of incorporation, our by-laws and Nevada law might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our Common Stock.

Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation, our By-Laws and Nevada law may have the effect of deterring unsolicited takeovers or delaying or preventing a change in control of our company or changes in our management, including transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. In addition, these provisions may limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests. These provisions include:

the inability of stockholders to call special meetings; and
the ability of our board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could include the right to approve an acquisition or other change in our control or could be used to institute a rights plan, also known as a poison pill, that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, likely preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board of directors.

The existence of the forgoing provisions and anti-takeover measures could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our Common Stock. They could also deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you could receive a premium for your Common Stock in an acquisition.

FINRA sales practice requirements may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our securities.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that an investment recommended to a customer is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives, and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will depend upon various factors, includingnot be suitable for certain customers. FINRA requirements will likely make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our Common Stock, which may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the shares, resulting in fewer broker-dealers may be willing to make a market in our shares, potentially reducing a stockholder’s ability to resell our securities.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, financial condition,if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our shares or if our results of operations capital requirements, investment opportunitiesdo not meet their expectations, the price of our securities and restrictions contained in current or future financing instruments, including the consent of debt holders and holders of Series A Shares, if applicable at such time, and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.trading volume could decline.

 

Shareholders mayThe trading market for our securities will be diluted significantly throughinfluenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our effortsbusiness. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of these analyst’s cease coverage of our company or fail to obtain financing and satisfy obligations throughpublish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the issuancefinancial markets, which in turn could cause our share price or trading volume to decline. Moreover, if one or more of securities.the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock, or if our results of operations do not meet their expectations, the price of our securities could decline.

 

Wherever possible, our board of directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations. In many instances, we believe that the non-cash consideration will consist of shares of our common stock, preferred stock or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, subject to the requirements of the NYSE American (which generally require shareholder approval for any transactions which would result in the issuance of more than 20% of our then outstanding shares of common stock or voting rights representing over 20% of our then outstanding shares of stock), to issue all or part of the authorized but unissued shares of common stock, preferred stock or warrants to purchase such shares of common stock. In addition, we may attempt to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock, possibly at a discount to market in the future. These actions will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing shareholders and may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material. Such issuances may also serve to enhance existing management’s ability to maintain control of us, because the shares may be issued to parties or entities committed to supporting existing management.

Additional Risks and Uncertainties

We are an oil and gas acquisition, exploration and development company. If any of the risks that we face actually occur, irrespective of whether those risks are described in this section or elsewhere in this report, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

Not applicable.

 

19 

Table of ContentsITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

We have one leased facility located at 117 South 4thStreet, Neodesha, Kansas 66757. This serves as the corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility. The facility is a lease of 4,000 square feet at a cost of $500 per month. Monthly rent increases $100 every year until the expiration of the lease in September 30, 2018. On August 22, 2018, the Company executed an amendment to the lease to renew the term of the lease for an additional one year, terminating on September 30, 2019 with no option to renew unless approved by our landlord the city commission of Neodesha.

 

FacilitiesAs a result of the Agribotix acquisition, we assumed a lease for offices in Boulder, Colorado for $2,000 per month. The lease, providing for 1,000 square feet of office space, ends on May 31, 2019 and has an option to terminate at any time with a 30-day prior notice period.

 

Executive officesWe believe that our existing facilities are maintained at 4040 Broadway, Suite 425, San Antonio, Texas 78209 under a month-to-month agreement. suitable and adequate to meet our current business requirements.

 

Oil and Gas Properties

Information regarding the Company’s oil and gas properties can be found in “Item 1. Business”, above and under “Note 14 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)” to the Financial Statements included herein.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.Legal Proceedings

 

On September 23, 2016, the Company, American Standard Energy Corporation, Baylor Operating LLC, Bernard GivenFrom time to time, we may become involved in lawsuits and Loeb & Loeb LLP were sued by Geronimo Holdings Corporation and Randal Cappslegal proceedings which arise in the 143rd Judicial District Court locatedordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in Pecos, Texas. The suit amongthese or other things, seeks damagesmatters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. Although we currently maintain liability insurance coverage intended to cover professional liability and certain other claims, we cannot assure that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us in the future where the outcomes of such claims are unfavorable to us. Liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage, including coverage for an alleged unlawful saleprofessional liability and certain other claims, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of properties in Crockett County Texas and for alleged unpaid royalties. The Company believes the suit is without merit and will vigorously defend itself. The Company has faith that it will prevail and at December 31, 2016 no reserve for potential losses arising from this matter has been recorded. Additionally, under its agreement with Baylor Operating LLC, Baylor has agreed to indemnify and defend the Company against all lawsuits and claims including this one.operations.

 

On April 26, 2016, C&F Ranch, LLC sued the Company in Allen County Kansas for alleged breach of contract related to the rental of certain lands located on the C&F Ranch. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company settled this dispute for $9,000.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

None.Not applicable.

 

 32

20 


PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information for Common Stock

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Our common stock tradesCommon Stock is currently quoted on the NYSE American under the symbol “ENRJ.“UAVS.

The following table listssets forth, for the quotations forperiod indicated, the quarterly high and low per share sales prices (per share of our common stockCommon Stock for each quarter during our last two fiscal years as reported by the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017. The market price of our common stock has been volatile. For an additional discussion, see “Item 1A: Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  New York Stock Exchange.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016  High  Low 
Quarter ended March 31, 2016  $0.59  $0.17 
Quarter ended June 30, 2016  $0.49  $0.22 
Quarter ended September 30, 2016  $0.83  $0.26 
Quarter ended December 31, 2016  $0.46  $0.24 
Year Ended December 31, 2017         
Quarter ended March 31, 2017  $0.81  $0.26 
Quarter ended June 30, 2017  $1.15  $0.21 
Quarter ended September 30, 2017  $0.46  $0.26 
Quarter ended December 31, 2017  $0.85  $0.20 

Holders

2019 High Low
First Quarter(through March 26, 2019) $.47  $.45 
         
2018 High Low
First Quarter $5.65  $3.55 
Second Quarter $2.04  $1.78 
Third Quarter $1.73  $1.62 
Fourth Quarter $0.59  $0.53 
         
2017  High   Low 
First Quarter $9.48  $8.55 
Second Quarter $8.38  $7.13 
Third Quarter $7.57  $7.50 
Fourth Quarter $5.75  $4.95 

 

As of March 15, 2018, there were 333 holders19, 2019, we had approximately 378 individual shareholders of record of our common stock, 8 holdersCommon Stock. We believe that the number of beneficial owners of our Common Stock is greater than the number of record holders, because a number of shares of our Series A preferred stock, and one holder of both our Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock.  Common Stock is held through brokerage firms in “street name.”

 

Dividends

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock. Through October 2015, we paid a monthly dividend of $.20833 per share or $2.50 in aggregate annual dividends per share on the Company’s non-convertible 10.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock. On November 4, 2015, the Company suspended the monthly dividend for the month of November 2015 on its 10.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) in order to preserve its cash resources. Payment of future dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Under the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, any unpaid dividends, will accumulate. If the Company does not pay dividends on its Series A Preferred Stock for six monthly periods (whether consecutive or non-consecutive), the dividend rate will increase to a maximum rate of 15.0% per annum and the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will have the right, at the next meeting of stockholders, to elect two directors to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors along with other members of the Board, until all accumulated accrued and unpaid dividends are paid in full. During 2017, cash dividends were not paid and the dividends accumulated at 15.0% per annum.Dividend Policy

 

We do not expectintend to pay any cash dividends onto our common stockstockholders in the foreseeable future. Additionally, we are contractually prohibited by the termsWe currently intend to retain all of our outstanding debt from paying cash dividends on our common stock. Payment ofavailable funds and future dividends on common stock,earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. Any future determination related to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend onupon, among other factors, our financial condition, results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, contained in current or future financing instruments, including the consent of debt holders and holders of Series A Preferred Stock, if applicable at such time,business prospects and other factors our Boardboard of Directors deemsdirectors may deem relevant.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under

Equity Compensation PlansPlan

 

The following table sets forthprovides information as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 regarding outstanding options granted under2018 about our stock option plansequity compensation plan and options reserved for future grant under the plans.arrangements .

 

        Number of shares 
  Number     remaining available for 
  of shares to be issued     future issuance under 
  upon exercise of  Weighted-average  equity compensation 
  outstanding options,  exercise price of  plans (excluding shares 
  warrants and rights  outstanding options,  reflected in column (a) 
Plan Category (a)  warrants and rights (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders  15,332  $7.63   700,158 
Plan category Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  1,287,103  $0.46   712,897 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  207,055   0.06    
Total  1,494,158  $0.46   712,897 

 

 33

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

Except as discussed below, the Company has not issued, sold or granted any unregistered securities since September 30, 2017, other than those issuances, sales and grants which have previously been included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.None

 

On July 14, 2017, July 28, 2017 and August 30, 2017, the Company entered into Secured Promissory Notes totaling $225,000 with Alpha Capital Anstalt, which have a maturity date of June 30, 2018, and accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The amount due under the notes is secured by a security interest, subordinate to certain other security interests of the Company, in substantially all of the Company's assets. The amount due under the notes is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at the option of Alpha Capital Anstalt, on identical terms as the outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (i.e., an initial conversion price of $0.30 per share, a 9.9% ownership limitation and certain anti-dilution rights, which currently result in a conversion price of $0.0612 per share). As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $225,000 remained due.

As previously reported, on April 27, 2017, the Company entered into an Additional Issuance Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt, for the purchase of 300 restricted shares of the Company's then newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in consideration for $300,000, with an option to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had issued 300 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had received $200,000 from Alpha Capital Anstalt to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which shares had not been issued as of December 31, 2017, and which are reflected as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Issuable on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, in the aggregate amount of $200,000.

On February 13, 2018, the Company issued Alpha Capital Anstalt the 200,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock which it was due pursuant to the terms of the April 27, 2017, Additional Issuance Agreement, in consideration for the $200,000 paid during the year ended December 31, 2017.

We claim an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act, since the transactions did not involve a public offering, the recipient was an “accredited investor”, and acquired the securities for investment only and not with a view towards, or for resale in connection with, the public sale or distribution thereof. The securities are subject to transfer restrictions, and the certificates evidencing the securities contain an appropriate legend stating that such securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold absent registration or pursuant to an exemption therefrom and are further subject to the terms of the escrow agreement. The securities were not registered under the Securities Act and such securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an exemption from registration under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted (a) 343.671 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 5,610,955 shares of common stock; and (b) 103.142 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,683,944 shares of common stock, pursuant to the terms of such securities.

We claim an exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act for such issuance, as the securities were exchanged by us with our existing security holder in a transaction where no commission or other remuneration was paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchange.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Its Affiliates

None.

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Not applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

This Management’s Discussionitem is not required for Smaller Reporting Companies.

21 

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion highlights the principal factors that have affected our financial condition and Analysisresults of Financial Conditionoperations as well as our liquidity and Results of Operations sectioncapital resources for the periods described. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the other sectionsrelated notes included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see the explanatory note concerning “Forward-Looking Statements” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K including “Item 1 Business” and “Item 2. Properties” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. This section includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27AItem 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements such as “will”, “believe,” “are projected to be” and similar expressions are statements regarding future events or our future performance, and include statements regarding projected operating results. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, beliefs, intentions, strategies, forecastsuncertainties, risks and assumptions and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated byassociated with these forward-looking statements. These risks include, but areThe operating results for the periods presented were not limited to: our ability to deploy capital in a manner that maximizes stockholder value; the ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates or business and investments opportunities; the ability to reduce our operating costs; general economic conditions and our expected liquidity in future periods. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and could besignificantly affected by inflation.

Company Overview

On March 26, 2018, EnerJex Resources, Inc. (“EnerJex”), a Nevada company, consummated the uncertaintiestransactions contemplated by the Agreement and risk factors described throughout this filingPlan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated October 19, 2017, pursuant to which AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and particularly ina wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex, merged with and into AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., a privately held company organized under the “Risk Factors” set forth in Part I, Item 1Alaws of this Annual Reportthe state of Nevada (“AgEagle Sub”), with AgEagle Sub surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex (the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger, EnerJex changed its name to AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (the “Company, “we,” “our,” or “us”) and AgEagle Sub changed its name to “AgEagle Aerial, Inc.” Our Common Stock will continue to trade on Form 10-K.the NYSE American under its new symbol “UAVS” commencing on March 27, 2018. As a result of the Merger, through AgEagle Sub, we are now engaged in the business of designing, developing, producing, distributing and supporting technologically-advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones) that we supply to the precision agriculture industry. Additionally, we recently announced a new service offering using our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.leased UAVs and associated data processing services for the sustainable agriculture industry.

 

Overview We are headquartered in Neodesha, Kansas, and are a manufacturer of unmanned aerial vehicles focused on providing actionable data to the precision agriculture industry. We design, produce, distribute and support technologically-advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones) that we offer for sale commercially to the precision agriculture industry. Additionally, we recently announced a new service offering using our UAVs and associated data processing services for the sustainable agriculture industry and aerial imaging processing services.

 

Since Historically, AgEagle derived the execution of the merger agreement on October 19, 2017, our primary business strategy has focused on achieving the requirements necessary to consummate the merger. We continue to move forward with this strategy with an anticipated closing prior to March 31, 2018. In the event the merger is not consummated, our intent is to refocus on the development of oil and gas properties. Our business activities are currently focused in Kansas.

Results of Operations

The following table presents selected information regarding our operating results from continuing operations.

  Year Ended  Year Ended    
  December 31,  December 31,    
  2017  2016  Difference 
Oil & gas revenues(1)            
Crude oil revenues $1,309,496  $2,390,024  $(1,080,528)
Average price per Bbl  41.04   40.75   0.29 
Natural gas revenues  19,509   71,703   (52,194)
Average price per Mcf  1.67   1.51   0.16 
Expenses:            
Lease operating expenses(2)  1,363,946   2,661,258   (1,297,312)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization(3)  239,776   254,329   (14,553)
Impairment of oil and gas properties     8,032,670   (8,032,670)
Total production expenses  1,603,722   10,948,257   (9,344,535)
Professional fees(4)  1,390,512   310,471   1,080,041 
Salaries(5)  350,863   1,723,789   (1,372,926)
Depreciation - other fixed assets  106,421   159,638   (53,217)
Administrative expenses(6)  545,267   458,375   86,892 
Total expenses $3,996,785  $13,600,530  $(9,603,745)

 34

(1)2017 crude oil revenues decreased $1.1 million or 45% to 1.3 million from $2.4 million in fiscal 2016.  This decrease was due to the decline in production. Realized oil prices increased $0.29 or 1% during 2017 from an average of $40.75 per bbl in 2016 to an average of $41.04 per bbl in 2017. Increasing prices offset the drop in crude oil revenues by approximately $17,000. A decrease in production volumes in 2017 accounted for substantially all of the $1.1 million decrease in revenues. Volumes decreased by approximately 26,700 bbls or 46% to 31,909 bbls in 2017 compared to production of 58,653 bbls in 2016.  2017 natural gas revenues decreased approximately $52,000 or 73% to $19,500 from $71,700 in 2016. The decrease was due to lower production in 2016. Natural gas prices increased $0.17 per mcf or 11% from an average price of $1.51 in 2016 to an average price of $1.67 in 2017. This increase in prices offset the decrease in revenue by $8,000. A decrease in production volumes accounted for $60,000 of the $52,000 decrease in revenues. Natural gas volumes decreased approximately 35,900 mcf or 76% in 2017 from 47,600 mcf in 2016 to 11,600 mcf in 2017.

(2)2017 lease operating expenses decreased $1.3 million or 49% to $1.4 million from $2.7 million in 2016. However, lease operating expenses per boe increased 1% or $0.32 to $40.29 in 2017 from $39.97 per boe in 2016.  

(3)Depletion expense per boe increased 85% or $3.26 per boe from $3.82 per boe in 2016 to $7.08 per boe in 2017. During 2017, depletion expense decreased approximately $14,000 to approximately $240,000 from $254,000 in 2016.

(4)Professional fees increased 348% or approximately $1.1 million from approximately $310,500 in 2016 to approximately $1,390,512 in 2017. The use of consultants, to replace the reduction in employees, accounted for $765,000 of this increase. In addition, legal fees increased by $309,000.

(5)Salaries decreased 80% or approximately $1.4 million. The decrease was due primarily to decreased head counts following the LSA transaction.

(6)Administrative expenses increased approximately $87,000 or 19%. The increase was due primarily to increased spending on SEC matters of $104,000.  

Reserves

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
Proved Reserves 2017  2016 
Total proved PV10 (present value) of reserves $1,468,540  $3,437,030 
Total proved reserves (BOE) $455,790  $1,587,690 
Average Price (per bbl) $51.34  $37.36 
Average Price (per mcf) $2.97  $1.65 

Of the 0.5 million BOE of total proved reserves, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped.

The following table presents summary information regarding our estimated net proved reserves as of December 31, 2017. All calculations of estimated net proved reserves have been made in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, and, except as otherwise indicated, give no effect to federal or state income taxes. The estimates of net proved reserves are based on the reserve reports prepared by Cobb & Associates Inc., our independent petroleum consultants. For additional information regarding our reserves, please see Note 14 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Summary of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

December 31, 2017

  Gross  Net 
     Natural
Gas
     Oil     Natural
Gas
     Oil    
Proved Reserves Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  PV 10(1) 
Category BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s  BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s  (before tax) 
Proved, Developed  94,100         94,100   66,810         66,810   511,740 
Proved, Undeveloped  525,100         525,100   388,980         388,980   956,800 
Total Proved  619,200         619,200   455,800         455,800   1,468,540 

In 2017 the Company invested approximately $4,600 in its oil and gas properties. These reduced expenditures were in response to extremely low commodity prices. At year end the Company’s review of proved undeveloped reserves revealed challenges but the Company maintains its belief that reserves will be developed within five years of their initial recording as a proved undeveloped reserve. In addition, it believes it has the financial wherewithal to develop allmajority of its proved undeveloped reserves within the five year time frames required; utilizing its balance sheet, to borrow funds as needed and it has the ability to joint venture any of its assets.

 35

(1)The following table shows our reconciliation of our PV10 to our standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (the most direct comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP). PV10 is our estimate of the present value of future net revenuesrevenue from estimated proved oil and gas reserves after deducting estimated production and ad valorem taxes, future capital costs and operating expenses, but before deducting any estimates of future income taxes. The estimated future net revenues are discounted at an annual rate of 10% to determine their “present value.” We believe PV10 to be an important measure for evaluating the relative significance of our oil and gas properties and that the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure of PV10 provides useful information to investors because it is widely used by professional analysts and sophisticated investors in evaluating oil and gas companies. Because there are many unique factors that can impact an individual company when estimating the amount of future income taxes to be paid, we believe the use of a pre-tax measure is valuable for evaluating our company. We believe that most other companies in the oil and gas industry calculate PV10 on the same basis. PV10 should not be considered as an alternative to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as computed under GAAP.
  As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
  2017  2016 
PV10 (before tax) $1,468,540  $3,437,030 
Future income taxes, net of 10% discount $  $ 
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $1,468,540  $3,437,030 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to meet potential cash requirements. We have historically met our capital requirements through debt financing, revenues from operations, asset sales and the issuance of equity securities. Accordingly, the Company has chosen to preserve liquidity by not devoting capital to its oil and gas properties, while minimizing expenditures for operating, general and administrative expenses.

In conjunction with the anticipated merger, the Company will satisfy its long-term indebtedness with the sale of its assets toAgEagle Classic and RAPID systems. However, as a result of the existing lenderdevelopment of our new product, the RX-60 and anticipates having sufficient liquidity post-merger to satisfy its other liabilities.RX-48, we will no longer manufacture and distribute our previous two systems. We believe that the UAV industry is currently in the early stages of development and has significant growth potential. Additionally, we believe that some of the innovative potential products in our research and development pipeline will emerge and gain traction as new growth platforms in the future, creating market opportunities.

 

The following table summarizes total current assets, total current liabilitiesWe deliver advanced solutions utilizing our proprietary technologies and working capital at the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.

  Year Ended  Year Ended    
  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016  Difference 
Current Assets $1,045,383  $1,678,967  $(633,584)
Current Liabilities $6,129,671  $19,754,406  $(13,624,789)
Working Capital (deficit) $(5,084,288) $(18,075,439) $12,991,151 

Senior Secured Credit Facility

On October 3, 2011, the Company, DD Energy, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC and Working Interest, LLC (“Borrowers”) entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank, N.A. (“Bank”)trade secrets that help farmers, agronomists and other financial institutionsprecision agricultural professionals operate more effectively and banks that may become a partyefficiently. Our UAVs were initially specifically designed to the Credit Agreement from time to time. The facilities provided under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement werehelp farmers increase profits by pinpointing areas where nutrients or chemicals need to be usedapplied, as opposed to refinance Borrowers prior outstanding revolving loan facility with Bank, dated July 3, 2008, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.

At our option, loans under the facility will bear stated interest based on the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin, or Floating Rate plus Floating Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Credit Agreement). The Base Rate will be, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (b) the Bank’s prime rate. The Floating Rate shall mean, at Borrower’s option, a per annum interest rate equal to (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus Eurodollar Margin, or (ii) the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). Eurodollar borrowings may be for one, two, three, or six months, as selected by the Borrowers. The margins for all loans are based on a pricing grid ranging from 0.00% to 0.75% for the Base Rate Margin and 2.25% to 3.00% for the Floating Rate Margin based on the Company’s Borrowing Base Utilization Percentage (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).

On December 15, 2011, we entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note intraditional widespread land application processes, thus decreasing input costs, reducing the amount of $50,000,000chemicals applied and potentially increasing yields. Our products are designed for busy agriculture professionals who do not have the time to process images on their computers, which some of our competitors require.

In addition to UAV sales, in late 2018, we introduced a new drone-leasing program, alleviating farmers and agribusinesses from significant upfront costs associated with purchasing a drone, while also relieving them from ongoing drone maintenance and support requirements. Additionally, the Bank. The Amendment reflectsnew program provides the additionoption of Rantoul Partners, as an additional Borrowerengaging a trained AgEagle pilot to operate the drone and adds as additional securitymanage the entire image collection process, creating a truly turnkey aerial imagery capture solution for the loans the assets held by Rantoul Partners.our customers.

 

 36

22 

 

On August 31, 2012,Our business is seasonal in nature and, as a result, our revenue and expenses and associated revenue trends fluctuate from quarter to quarter. For example, we entered into a Second Amendment to Amendedanticipate that the second and Restated Credit Agreement withthird quarter of each year will generally represent our strongest quarter in terms of customer contracts. Conversely, during the Bank. The Second Amendment: (i) increasedwinter months and the borrowing base to $7,000,000, (ii) reducedend of year holidays, when the minimum interest rate to 3.75%growing season is not on-going, we generally anticipate lower customer contracts. In addition, our net revenue is impacted by our marketing strategies, including the timing and (iii) added additional new leases as collateral foramount of paid advertising and promotional activity. We also anticipate that our net revenue will be impacted by the loan.timing and success of our ongoing product expansion. 

 

On November 2, 2012,Research and development activities are integral to our business and we entered intofollow a Third Amendmentdisciplined approach to Amendedinvesting our resources to create new technologies and Restated Credit Agreement withsolutions. With the Bank. The Third Amendment (i) increased the borrowing basewelcoming of our new CEO, Mr. Barrett Mooney, in 2018, we continue to $12,150,000 and (ii) clarified certain continuing covenants and provided a limited waiver of compliance with one of the covenants so clarified for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011.

On January 24, 2013, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was made effective as of December 31, 2012 with the Bank. The Fourth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the Bank consented to the restructuring transactions related to the dissolution of Rantoul Partners, and (ii) the Bank terminated a Limited Guaranty, as defined in the Credit Agreement, executed by Rantoul Partners in favor of the Bank.

On April 16, 2013, the Bank increased our borrowing base to $19,500,000.

On September 30, 2013, we entered into a Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Fifth Amendment reflects the following changes: it (i) expanded the principal commitment amount of the Bank to $100,000,000; (ii) increased the Borrowing Base to $38,000,000; (iii) added Black Raven Energy, Inc. to the Credit Agreement as a borrower party; (iv) added certain collateral and security interests in favor of the Bank; and (v) reduced the interest rate to 3.30%.

On November 19, 2013, we entered into a Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Sixth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the addition of Iberia Bank as a participantinvest in our credit facility,future success. Under his leadership, we intend to expand our software offerings and (ii) a technical correction to our covenant calculations.

On May 22, 2014, we entered into a Seventh Amendment to the Amendedleverage his experience in building scalable digital solutions promoting sustainability and Restated Credit Agreement. The Seventh Amendment reflects the Bank’s consent to our issuance of up to 850,000 shares of our 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock.software analytics. 

 

On August 15, 2014,28, 2018, we entered into an Eighth Amendment toclosed the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eighth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the borrowing base was increased from $38 million to $40 million, and (ii) the maturity of the facility was extended by three years to October 3, 2018.

On April 29, 2015, we entered into a Ninth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. In the Ninth Amendment, the Bank (i) re-determined the Borrowing Base based upon the Reserve Report dated January 1, 2015, (ii) imposed affirmative obligations on the Company to use a portion of proceeds received with regard to future sales of securities or certain assets to repay the loan, (iii) consented to non-compliancetransactions contemplated by the Company with certain terms of the Credit Agreement, (iv) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, and (v) agreed to certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.

On May 1, 2015, the Borrowers and the Banks entered into a Letter Agreement to clarify that up to $1,000,000 in proceeds from any potential future securities offering will be unencumbered by the Banks’ liens as described in the Credit Agreement through November 1, 2015, and that, until November 1, 2015, such proceeds would not be subject to certain provisions in the Credit Agreement prohibiting the Company from declaring and paying dividends that may be due and payable to holders of securities issued in such potential offerings or issued prior to the Letter Agreement.

On August 12, 2015, we entered into a Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Tenth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) allow the Company to sell certain oil assets in Kansas, (ii) allow for approximately $1,300,000 of the proceeds from the sale to be reinvested in Company owned oil and gas projects and (iii) apply not less than $1,500,000 from the proceeds of the sale to outstanding loan balances.

On November 13, 2015, the Company entered into a Eleventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eleventh Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, (ii) suspended certain hedging requirements, and (iii) made certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.  

On April 1, 2016, the Company informed the Bank that it would cease making the mandatory monthly borrowing base reduction payments and did not make the required April 1, 2016 payment. The Company made its mandatory quarterly interest payments on April 6, 2016 and May 2, 2016. On April 7, 2016, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement whereby the Bank agreed to not exercise remedies and rights afforded it under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for thirty days. The thirty day period was to be used by the Company to pursue strategic alternatives.

 37

On April 28, 2016, the Bank informed the Company that it would extend the above Forbearance Agreement period to May 31, 2016 upon effecting a principal reduction of $125,000. In addition, the Company will receive an automatic extension to September 15, 2016 upon meeting certain terms and conditions specified by the Bank. On May 31, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to August 31, 2016. On July 29, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to October 1, 2016. 

On October 1, 2016, the Company and the Bank could not reach an agreement to extend the Third Amendment to the Forbearance Agreement. Following this outcome, the Company decided to discontinue payment of interest on its outstanding loan obligations with the Bank. The Company continued to evaluate plans to restructure, amend or refinance existing debt through private options.  

On February 10, 2017, the Company, TCB and IberiaBank (collectively, “Sellers”), and PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, and certain financial institutions (collectively, “Buyers”) entered into a Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”), pursuant to which Sellers sold to Buyers, and Buyers purchased from Sellers, all of Sellers’ right, title and interest in, to and under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $5,000,000 (the “CashAsset Purchase Price”), (ii) a Synthetic Equity Interest equal to 10% of the proceeds, after Buyer’s realization of a 150% return on the Cash Purchase Price within five (5) years of the closing date of the sale, with payment being distributed 65.78947368% to TCB and 34.21052632% to IberiaBank, and (iii) at any time prior to February 10, 2022, Buyer may acquire the interest in clause (ii) above. In connection with the LSA, the Company released Sellers and its successors as holders of the rights under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, including Buyers, from any and all claims under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents. 

Also on February 10, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries, and successor lender entered into a binding letter agreement dated February 10, 2017, which was subsequently amended on March 30, 2017 (as amended, the “letter agreement”) pursuant to which:

1.the successor lender agreed to forgive our existing secured loan in the approximate principal amount of $17,295,000, and in exchange entered into a secured promissory note (which we refer to as the “restated secured note”) in the original principal amount of $4,500,000.
2.we:
a.conveyed our oil and gas properties and associated performance and surety bonds in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska;
b.conveyed all of our shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (together (a) and (b), the “conveyed oil and gas assets”); and
c.retained our assets in Kansas and continued as a going concern. The Kansas assets currently provide most of our current operating revenue.

The restated secured note:

a.is secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s oil and gas producing assets situated in the State of Kansas,
b.evidences accrued interest on the $4,500,000 principal balance at a rate of 16% per annum,
c.bears interest from and after May 1, 2017, at a rate of 16.0% per annum,
d.is pre-payable in full at a discount at any time during the term of the restated secured note upon the Company paying $3,300,000 to successor lender, and
e.matures and is due and payable in full on November 1, 2017 (which date has been extended as discussed below).

The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

So long as we repay the $3,300,000 in indebtedness on or prior to the maturity date, as extended, all other amounts payable under the restated secured note are to be forgiven.

The closing occurred on May 10, 2017. As part of the closing procedures and net settlement, we issued a promissory note to Pass Creek Resources LLC in the amount of $105,806. The promissory bears interest at 16% per annum and matured on June 9, 2017. The amount due was not paid on June 9, 2017, but the holder has not provided the Company a notice of default.

 38

In connection with the May 10, 2017 closing and in consideration of the satisfaction of $13,425,000 of the amount due under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries transferred to PCR Holdings LLC, an affiliate of the successor lenders under the Credit Agreement, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties and assets located in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska, as well as the Company’s shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above. 

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees its subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties or assets.

On December 22, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment)“Purchase Agreement”) dated July 25, 2018 with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Date of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provide notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub,Aerial, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Agribotix, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Agribotix” or the “Seller”), and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.the other parties named therein. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we acquired all right, title and interest in and to all assets owned by the Agribotix utilized in their business of providing integrated agricultural drone solutions and drone-enabled software technologies and services for precision agriculture, except for certain excluded assets as set forth in the Purchase Agreement. At closing, we also assumed certain commitments under various third-party contracts pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of First Amendment, Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has the option to extend the maturity dateterms of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $4,457,347 along with accrued interest of $479,452 remained due under the Amended and Restated CreditPurchase Agreement. At December 31, 2017, the Company was not in compliance with certain covenants, and the loan may be called due by Pass Creek.

As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $80,805 along with accrued interest of $9,616 remained due under the promissory note with Pass Creek Resources LLC.  

On July 14, 2017, July 28, 2017 and August 30, 2017, the Company entered into Secured Promissory Notes totaling $225,000 with Alpha Capital Anstalt, which have a maturity date of June 30, 2018, and accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The amount due under the notes is secured by a security interest, subordinate to certain other security interests of the Company, in substantially all of the Company's assets. The amount due under the notes is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at the option of Alpha Capital Anstalt, on identical terms as the outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (i.e., an initial conversion price of $0.30 per share, a 9.9% ownership limitation and certain anti-dilution rights, which currently result in a conversion price of $0.0612 per share). As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $225,000 remained due.

Satisfaction of our cash obligations for the next 12 months

In conjunction with the anticipated merger, the Company will satisfy its long-term indebtedness with the sale of its assets to the existing lender and anticipates having sufficient liquidity post-merger to satisfy its other liabilities.

Summary of product research and development that we will perform for the term of our plan

 

We do not anticipate performing any significantbelieve that purchasing Agribotix’s primary product researchFarmLens™, a subscription cloud analytics service that processes data, primarily collected with a drone such as ours, and development undermakes such data usable by farmers and agronomists it will benefit us and our plan of operation.shareholders by developing important vertically integrated products and services.FarmLens is currently sold by us as a subscription and offered either standalone or in a bundle with major drone platforms manufactured by leading drone providers like AgEagle, DJI, and senseFly. 

 

Expected purchase or sale of any significant equipmentTheFarmLensplatform extends our reach as a business by partnering with and directly integrating into offerings by leading agricultural companies like John Deere’s Operations Center and The Climate Corporation’s FieldView. To date, Agribotix has processed agricultural imagery for over 50 different crop types from over 50 countries around the world.

 

In the event the merger is not consummated, we anticipate that we will purchase the necessary production and field service equipment required to produce oil and gas during our normal course of operations over the next 12 months.

Significant changes in the number of employees

We currently have one full-time employee. We use and will continue to use independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, particularly in the area of land services, reservoir engineering, and general and administrative functions. We believe that this use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to contain operating and general expenses, and capital costs.  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

 39

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our accounting policiesmanagement’s discussion and estimates that are critical to our business operations and understanding of our results of operations include those relating to our oil and gas properties, asset retirement obligations and the value of share-based payments. This is not a comprehensive list of all of the accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP, with no need for our judgment in the application. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. However, certain of our accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayalanalysis of our financial positioncondition and results of operations and we may use significant judgment in the application; as a result, they are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying those policies, we use our judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our most critical estimates include those related to revenue recognition, inventories and reserves for excess and obsolescence, accounting for stock-based awards, and income taxes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience observationand on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of trends inwhich form the industry,basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and information availableliabilities that are not readily apparent from other outside sources, as appropriate. For asources. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting estimates affect our more detailed discussion on the application of thesesignificant judgments and other accounting policies,estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements. Please see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,2 to our consolidated financial statements, which are included in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report.Annual Report, for our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. There have been no material changes made to the critical accounting estimates during the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements

 

Oil

23 

Revenue Recognition

 Revenue is recognized when earned. Our revenue recognition policies are in compliance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and Gas Propertiesthe Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 and 104. This updated guidance supersedes the current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The updated guidance introduces a five-step model to achieve its core principal of the entity recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This standard provides a single set of guidelines for revenue recognition to be used across all industries and requires additional disclosures. It is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.

 

We followTopic 606 requires revenue to be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in amounts that reflect the full-costconsideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and recognize revenue under the new standard as costs are incurred. Under previous U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), revenue was generally recognized when deliveries were made, performance milestones were attained, or as costs were incurred. The new standard accelerates the timing of when the revenue is recognized, however, it does not change the total amount of revenue recognized on these contracts. The new standard does not affect revenue recognition for purposes of the Company’s sales as each of the Company’s revenue transactions represent a single performance obligation that is satisfied at a point time or monthly subscription fees which are recognized ratably over the subscription period, as defined in the new ASU. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue for small UAS product contracts with customers at the point in time when the transfer of control passes to the customer, which is generally when title and risk of loss transfer. The Company adopted the updated guidance effective January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective method, however the new standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of accounting under which all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized. We also capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified withoperations, as it did not change the manner or timing of recognizing revenue on a majority of our acquisition, exploration and development activities and do not include costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities.revenue transactions. 

 

Proved properties are amortized usingGoodwill

We review the unitsrecoverability of production method (UOP). Currently we only have operationsgoodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the Unites Statescarrying amount of America. The UOP calculation multiplies the percentage of estimated proved reserves produced each quarter by the cost of these reserves. The amortization base in the UOP calculation includes the sum of proved property, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A), estimated future development costs (future costs to access and develop proved reserves) and asset retirement costs, less related salvage value.

The cost of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization calculation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to such properties or until development projects are placed into service. Geological and geophysical costs not associated with specific properties are recorded as proved property immediately. Unproved properties are reviewed for impairment quarterly.

Under the full cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less deferred income taxes,assets may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.”be recoverable or o on an annual basis. The ceiling limitation is (a) the present value of future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil & gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil & gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of 10 percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditionsplus (b) the cost of properties not being amortizedplus (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortizedless (d) income tax effects related to differences between book and tax basis of properties. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costsbased upon, among other things assumptions about expected future operating performance, and an unweighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect onmay differ from actual cash flows. If the first day of eachsum of the previous 12 months held flat forprojected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the lifecarrying value of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made. As of December 31, 2018, there have been no events or changes in circumstances that indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment has occurred since assessment date of August 2018.

 

Any excessIntangible Assets – Acquired in Business Combinations

We perform valuations of the net book value of proved oilassets acquired and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional DD&A in the statement of operations. The ceiling calculation is performed quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2016, impairment charges of $8,032,670 were recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.

Proceeds from the sale or disposition of oil and gas properties areliabilities assumed on each acquisition accounted for as a reductionbusiness combination and allocate the purchase price of each acquired business to capitalizedour respective net tangible and intangible assets. Acquired intangible assets include: customer relationships and trade names. We use valuation techniques to value these intangibles assets, with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various assumptions and estimates including projected revenue, gross margins, operating costs, unless a significant portion (greater than 25%) of our reserve quantitiesgrowth rates, useful lives and discount rates Intangible assets are sold,amortized over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method which approximates the pattern in which case a gain or loss is recognized in income.the economic benefits are consumed.

 

Asset Retirement ObligationsShare-Based Compensation Awards

The asset retirement obligation relates to the plug and abandonment costs when our wells are no longer useful. We determine the value of the liability by obtaining quotes for this service and estimate the increase we will face in the future. We then discount the future value based on an intrinsic interest rate that is appropriate for us. If costs rise more than what we have expected there could be additional charges in the future however we monitor the costs of the abandoned wells and we will adjust this liability if necessary.

Share-Based Payments

The value we assign to the options and warrants that we issue is based on the fair market value as calculated by the Black-Scholes pricing model. To perform a calculation of the value of our options, and warrants, we determine an estimate of the volatility of our stock. We need to estimate volatility because there has not been enough trading of our stock to determine an appropriate measure of volatility. We believe our estimate of volatility is reasonable, and we review the assumptions used to determine this whenever we issue a new equity instruments. If we have a material error in our estimate of the volatility of our stock, our expenses could be understated or overstated. All share-based awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options.

 

 40

24 

 

Recent IssuedIncome Taxes

We are required to estimate our income taxes, which includes estimating our current income taxes as well as measuring the temporary differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. We currently have significant deferred assets, which are subject to periodic recoverability assessments. Realizing our deferred tax assets principally depends on our achieving projected future taxable income. We may change our judgments regarding future profitability due to future market conditions and other factors, which may result in recording a valuation allowance against those deferred tax assets.

We followed the guidance in SEC Staff Accounting StandardsBulletin 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides additional clarification regarding the application of ASC Topic 740 in situations where we do not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) for the reporting period in which the Act was enacted. SAB 118 provides for a measurement period beginning in the reporting period that includes the Act’s enactment date and ending when the Company has obtained, prepared, and analyzed the information needed in order to complete the accounting requirements but in no circumstances should the measurement period extend beyond one year from the enactment date.

Results of Operations

 

See Note 1, SummaryYear Ended December 31, 2018 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded revenues of Significant Accounting Policies – Recent Issued Accounting Standards,$107,813 compared to revenues of $116,035 for the same period in 2017, a 7% decrease. The decrease was due to a shift in the drone industry from do-it-yourself, early adopter farmers to a more services-oriented model whereby independent agronomists provided prescriptions for the application of chemicals based on data they collect through aerial imagery and drones. The Company is in the process of addressing this change in the market through strategic acquisitions and the launch of a service-oriented model toward sustainable markets as result of the recent infusion of operating capital and significant reduction of debt.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, cost of sales totaled $61,680, a $31,679 or 34% decrease as compared to $93,359 in the year ended December 31, 2017. We had a gross profit of $46,133 or 43% during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $22,677 or 20% for the comparable period in 2017, resulting in an increase in our profit margins for the year. There were two main contributors to the decrease in our cost of sales resulting in the increase in our gross margins: 1) we focused on selling our UAVS products without cellular connectivity resulting in a much lower cost of manufacturing of our drones and instead utilized theFarmLens platform for purposes of processing the imagery versus the selling our drones with cellular connectivity and 2) we did not record any additional amounts to our consolidatedobsolescence reserve as we did not believe it to be necessary once we conducted our year-end inventory observation procedures. We also had some subscription-based sales for the quarter of 2018 that although a small amount of revenue resulted in much higher profit margins to our business.

We recorded total operating expenses of $2,106,732 during 2018, a 206% increase as compared to operating expenses of $689,539 in the same period of 2017. Our operating expense are comprised of general and administrative costs, professional fee and selling costs. General and administrative expenses totaled $1,333,371 in 2018 compared to $247,837 in 2017, an increase of 438%, due to more insurance, financial statements includedfiling fees and investor relations in this report.connection with on-going expenses related to us being publically traded. We also had additional general and administrative costs related to an increase in salary expense for new and existing employees along with stock compensation costs for employees and directors due to the issuance of options. Lastly as part of our acquisition of Agribotix we recorded amortization expense related to the intangibles acquired and new software costs incurred to support the business. Professional fees totaling $696,222 in 2018 were expenses incurred for legal and accounting, compared to $410,698 in 2017 which related to increased legal, audit, accounting and tax services associated with the in connection with the reverse merger completed on March 26, 2018 and the acquisition of Agribotix and the on-going expenses related to being publically traded. Selling expenses of $77,139 in 2018 compared to $31,004 in 2017 representing an increase of 171% due to more travel expenses and website investment made to market our new business model.

25 

Other income for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $13,333 and $12,458 for the year ended 2017, representing a 7% increase due the reversal of dealer termination costs accrued from prior periods as a result of all liabilities having been fully satisfied during the period.

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $32,417 as compared to $142,810 in the prior year. The decrease was due to the conversion of all debt, except for a promissory note assumed as a result of the EnerJex merger and the amortization of debt discounts and warrant expense in 2017 totaling $34,082 that were not recorded in 2018.

Our net loss was $2,079,683 in 2018. This represents a $1,282,468 increase from our net loss of $797,215 in 2017, Overall the increase in net loss is due to more costs and less sales for the period as we begin our new initiatives in the sustainable agriculture market. 

 

EffectsCash Flows

December 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017

Cash on hand was $2,601,730 at December 31, 2018, an increase of Inflation$2,566,441 compared to the $35,289 on hand at December 31, 2017. Cash used in operations for 2018 was $1,778,138 compared to $328,878 of cash used by operations for 2017. The increase was driven mainly by new expenses due to us becoming a publicly traded company which included insurance expense related to the current and Pricingprevious directors and officers of Enerjex of $107,645 that was prepaid in full and additional payables related to the increase in operating costs associated with the SEC filing requirements, legal costs for both our SEC requirements and the acquisition of Agribotix along additional salary expense for new and existing employees that were incurred due to the expansion of our business model. We also recorded non-cash expenses of $400,600 for stock issued in exchange for services and $110,593 of stock compensation expense.

Cash used by investing activities during 2018 was $1,560,219 mainly for the payments related to the acquisition of Agribotix,a significant amount of accounts payable assumed by us in the amount of $891,474 due to the Merger,offset by $256,255 cash acquired in connection with the Merger compared to cash used by investing activities during 2017 of $87,775 for payments related to the acquisition of Agribotix and purchases of equipment for manufacturing of our drones.

Cash provided by financing activities during 2018 was $5,904,799 as a result of $4,000,000 net of $20,000 in fees invested in the company in exchange for common and preferred shares at the time of the Merger and another $2,000,000 net of $30,000 in fees. Cash was also used to repurchase shares from a shareholder for $210,642 and make payments of $84,559 on the promissory note assumed from Enerjex offset by additional cash that was received in connection with issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock of $250,000 subsequent to the Merger.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2018, we had working capital of $2,531,264 and a loss from operations of $2,060,599 for the period then ended. While there can be no guarantees, we believe cash on hand, in connection with cash from operations will be sufficient to fund operations for the next year of operations. In addition, we intend to pursue other opportunities of financing with outside investors.

On November 21, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) signed a binding commitment letter EnerJex to provide prior to or at the closing of the Merger a minimum of $4 million in new equity capital (the “Private Placement”). The Private Placement was consummated on March 26, 2018. In connection with the Private Placement, Alpha purchased an additional 4,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1,000 per share for total aggregate consideration of $4 million. The Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into 2,612,245 shares of our Common Stock. In addition, as consideration for their funding commitment, Alpha received a fee equal to 408,552 shares of our Common Stock.

26 

Each share of Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into a number of shares of our Common Stock equal to the quotient determined by dividing (x) the stated value of $1,000 per share, by (y) a conversion price of $1.53. Until the volume weighted average price of our Common Stock on NYSE exceeds $107.50 with average trading volume of 200,000 shares per day for ten consecutive trading days, the conversion price of our Series C Preferred Stock is subject to full-ratchet, anti-dilution price protection. Under that provision, if, while that full-ratchet, anti-dilution price protection is in effect, we issue shares of our Common Stock at a price per share (the “Dilutive Price”) that is less than the conversion price, then the conversion price of our Series C Preferred Stock is automatically reduced to be equal to the Dilutive Price. The effect of that reduction is that, upon the issuance of shares of Common Stock at a Dilutive Price, the Series C Preferred Stock would be convertible into a greater number of shares of our Common Stock.

On December 27, 2018, AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (the “Company”) entered into Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with an institutional investor (the “Purchaser”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) designated a new series of preferred stock, the Series D Preferred Stock, which is non-convertible and provides for an 8% annual dividend and is subject to optional redemption by the Company (the “Preferred Stock”). The Company issued 2,000 shares of Preferred Stock and a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 3,703,703 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), for $2,000,000 in gross proceeds. The shares of Common Stock underling the Warrant are referred to as the “Warrant Shares”. The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) granting registration rights to the Purchaser with respect to the Warrant Shares.

 

The oilAgreement provides that upon a subsequent financing or financings with net proceeds of at least $500,000, the Company must exercise its optional redemption of the Preferred Stock (as more fully described below in Item 5.03) and gas industryapply any and all net proceeds from such financing(s) to the redemption in full of the Preferred Stock.

The Warrant is very cyclicalexercisable for a period of five years through December 26, 2023, at an exercise price equal to $0.54 per share, and is subject to customary adjustments for stock splits dividend, rights offerings, pro rata distributions and fundamental transactions. In addition, in the demandevent the Company undertakes a subsequent equity financing or financings at an effective price per share that is less than $0.54, the exercise price of the Warrant shall be reduced to the lower price.

The Warrant provides that the Warrant holder shall have a “Beneficial Ownership Limitation” equal to 9.99% of the number of shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of this Warrant. The Warrant holder, upon notice to the Company, may increase or decrease the Beneficial Ownership Limitation, as provided for goodsin the Warrant.

Pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company shall file an initial registration statement registering the Warrant Shares no later than the 20thcalendar day following the required filing date of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2018 (the “Filing Date”) and, services of oil and gas field companies, suppliers and others associatedwith respect to any additional registration statements, the earliest practical date on which the Company is permitted by SEC Guidance to file such additional registration statement related to such registrable securities. The Company shall have the registration statement declared effective with the industry puts extreme pressureSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) no later than the 90th calendar day following the Filing Date or, in the event of a “full review” by the Commission, the 120th calendar day following the Filing Date. There are no penalties for failure to file or be declared effective by the dates set forth above.

The Series C and D Preferred Stock was issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder, in reliance on the economic stabilityrecipient’s status as an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D.

27 

The Series C Preferred Stock was issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and pricing structure withinRule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder, in reliance on the industry. Material changesrecipient’s status as an “accredited investor” as defined in prices impact revenue stream, estimatesRule 501(a) of future reserves, borrowing base calculations of bank loans and value of properties in purchase and sale transactions. Material changes in prices can impact the value of oil and gas companies and their ability to raise capital, borrow money and retain personnel. We anticipate business costs and the demand for services related to production and exploration will fluctuate while the commodity price for oil and gas remains volatile.Regulation D.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

Not applicable.At December 31, 2018, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. Since our inception, except for standard operating leases, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities. We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Management Responsibility for Financial InformationContractual Obligations

 

We have no material contractual obligations.

Inflation

Our opinion is that inflation has not had, and is not expected to have, a material effect on our operations.

Climate Change

Our opinion is that neither climate change, nor governmental regulations related to climate change, have had, or are responsibleexpected to have, any material effect on our operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

There were various updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to a have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

This Item is not required for the preparation, integrity and fair presentation of oura Smaller Reporting Company.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our financial statements andare contained in pages F-1 through F-29, which appear at the other information that appears inend of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

28 

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure and Control Procedures

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally acceptedCompany’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2018 and had concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. The termdisclosure controls and proceduresmeans controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the United Statesreports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, estimates based on our best judgment.

We maintain a comprehensive system of internalwithout limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance, at anensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate cost-benefit relationship, that our financial information is accurate and reliable, our assets are safeguarded and our transactions are executed in accordance with established procedures.  to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

RBSM LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, is retained to audit our consolidated financial statements. Its accompanying report is based on audits conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

Our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, and other information required by this Item 8 are included in this report beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Interim Chief Executive Officer, Louis G. Schott, and our Interim Chief Financial Officer, Robert Schleizer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Report pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based on the evaluation, Mr. Schott and Mr. Schleizer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

OurThe Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, as is defined in RulesRule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) ofunder the Exchange Act. TheseThe Company’s internal controls arecontrol over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance thatregarding the reportedreliability of financial information is presented fairly, that disclosures are adequatereporting and that the judgments inherent in the preparation of financial statements are reasonable. There arein accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).

Because of its inherent limitations, in the effectiveness of anya system of internal control includingover financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance of such reliability and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the possibilityrisk that controls may become inadequate because of human error and overridingchanges in conditions, or that the degree of controls. Consequently, an effective internal control system can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance,compliance with respect to reporting financial information. the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

 41

Management has conducted, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, an evaluationassessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting used the criteria set forth in SEC Release 33-8810 based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (“COSO”) inInternal Control over Financial Reporting — Guidance for Smaller Public Companies.Based on this evaluation, managementManagement concluded that our system of internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2017. Such conclusion reflects the termination2018, based on these criteria.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our financial reporting staff during 2017. Until we are able to remedy these weaknesses, we are relying on third party consultants to assist withindependent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As a smaller reporting company, our management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only the management’s report.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Effective August 17, 2017, Robert Schleizer was appointed as Interim Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting/financial officer of the Company. He replaced Douglas M. Wright who resigned to pursue other business opportunities.

Other than the above, thereThere were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, that occurredas defined in Rules 13a-15(t) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recent fiscalthe fourth quarter ended December 31, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.   

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

 42

29 

 

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table and biographical summaries set forth information, including principal occupation and business experience about our directors and executive officers:

NameAgeOther positions with the Company; other directorships held in last five yearsHas served as a Company director since
Bret Chilcott57Chairman of the Board, President and SecretaryApril 2014
Barrett Mooney34Chief Executive Officer
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern46Chief Financial Officer
Grant Begley(1)(2)(3)65DirectorJune 2016
Louisa Ingargiola(1)(2)(3)51DirectorNovember 2018
Thomas Gardner(1)(2)(3)43DirectorJune 2016
Corbett Kull50DirectorJuly 2018

(1)Member of the audit committee.
(2)Member of the compensation committee.
(3)Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

Bret Chilcott. Mr. Chilcott has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and as President since the inception of the Company in April 2014 and had served as Chief Executive Officer from February 2016 to July 18, 2018. As of July 18, 2018, Mr. Chilcott stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and currently serves as President, Secretary and Chairman of the Board of the Directors. The path to the Company started when Mr. Chilcott established his advanced composite manufacturing company, Solutions by Chilcott, LLC, whose manufacturing processes led the way to the initial fixed wing design of the Company. Previously, Mr. Chilcott spent over 12 years with Cobalt Boats in Neodesha, Kansas, where he held a variety of positions from Director of Product Development and Engineering to Director of Sales and Marketing. In those positions, he was responsible for developing strategic product plans for the company as well as the management of regional sales managers. Prior to Cobalt Boats, Mr. Chilcott also spent a number of years working at the Cessna Aircraft Company and Snap-on Tools. It was at Snap-on Tools, acting as a national accounts manager, that Mr. Chilcott first established his blueprint for a dealer network, a model which he carried over successfully to the Company when the Company began selling its product. Mr. Chilcott graduated from Kansas Community College in 1982 with a degree in Sales and Marketing. The Company believes that Mr. Chilcott’s background and experience in composite parts manufacturing provides him with a broad familiarity of the range of issues confronting the Company in the market, which makes him a qualified member of our board.

Barrett Mooney. Mr. Mooney was appointed as Chief Executive Officer on July 18, 2018. Mr. Mooney brings an extensive track record of growing agriculture and sustainability businesses. From May 1, 2017 to July 18, 2018, he served as Group Product Lead for The Climate Corporation, a subsidiary of Monsanto (recently acquired by Bayer), where he led the satellite imagery team, managed a team focused on using artificial intelligence to enhance crop yield production an introduced a new organizational structure to improve sales efficiency. Prior to The Climate Corporation, from July 1, 2012 to May 1, 2017, Mr. Mooney co-founded and was CEO and president of HydroBio, a software company that used satellite-driven image analytics to conserve water and maximize crop yields. In May 2017, he sold HydroBio to The Climate Corporation. Mr. Mooney holds a Doctor of Philosophy in Agricultural and Biological Engineering from the University of Florida. He is also a member of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.

30 

Nicole Fernandez-McGovern, CPA.In August 2016, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern was named AgEagle’s Chief Financial Officer, charged with overseeing the Company’s global financial operations to include managing financial planning, general tax and accounting activities, capital formation, SEC reporting and other key financial duties. Prior to joining AgEagle, she served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Trunity Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded education technology company. While at Trunity, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern led the successful restructuring of the Company by acquiring a new compounding pharmacy business and finalizing the spin-out of the legacy education business into a newly formed private company. From 2011 through 2013, she was President of RCM Financial Consulting, a specialized consulting firm focused on providing interim accounting and financial services to small and medium sized businesses. For the preceding ten years, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern was a financial manager at Elizabeth Arden where she was involved with all aspects of the Nasdaq-listed company’s SEC and financial reporting processes. She launched her professional career at KPMG, LLP in its audit and assurance practice, where she managed various large -scale engagements for both public and privately held companies. Ms. Fernandez-McGovern earned a Master of Business Administration degree with concentration in Accounting and International Business and a Bachelor of Business Administration degree with concentration in Accounting, both from the University of Miami. In addition to being fluent in Spanish, she is also a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Florida and serves on the boards of the South Florida Chapter of Financial Executives International and Pembroke Pines Charter Schools.

Grant Begley. Mr. Begley has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since June 2016. Since July 2011, Mr. Begley has served as President of Concepts to Capabilities Consulting LLC, which advises global executive clients on competitive positioning and performance in aerospace. From August 2010 to September 2011, Mr. Begley was Corporate Senior Vice President for Alion Science and Technology. Prior to Alion, Mr. Begley served as Pentagon Senior Advisor to the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, for Unmanned Systems, advising on critical issues and leading development of DoD’s 2011 Unmanned Systems Roadmap. Mr. Begley’s career includes defense industry leadership positions for the development of advanced capabilities with Raytheon and Lockheed Martin where he initiated and led cross-corporation unmanned systems and robotics successes. Mr. Begley served in the United States Navy for 26 years, where his duties included operational assignments flying fighter aircraft, designated Top Gun, followed by acquisition assignments for the development and management of next generation manned and unmanned aircraft systems, weapon systems and joint executive acquisition assignments. Mr. Begley holds Master’s degrees in Aerospace and Aeronautic Engineering from the Naval Post-Graduate School and a Bachelor’s degree in General Engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy. The Company believes that Mr. Begley’s 20 plus years of experience as a UAV industry expert, focused on UAV technologies, regulations and commercial applications, will be an invaluable resource to the Board of Directors.

Louisa Ingargiola. Ms. Ingargiola has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since November 27, 2018. In 1990, Ms. Ingargiola joined Boston Capital Partners as an Investment Advisor in their Limited Partnership Division. In this capacity, she worked with investors and partners to report investment results, file tax forms, and recommend investments. In 1992, Ms. Ingargiola joined MetLife Insurance Company as a Budget and Expense Manager. In this capacity she managed a $30 million annual budget. Her responsibilities included budget implementation, expense and variance analysis and financial reporting. From 2007 through 2016, Ms. Ingargiola served as the Chief Financial Officer at MagneGas Corporation (NASDAQ: MNGA) and continues to serve as a director. Ms. Ingargiola currently serves as Chief Financial Officer of Avalon-Globocare (NASDAQ:AVCO) and as the Audit Committee Chair of FTE Networks, Inc. (NYSE:FTNW) and Electra Meccanica (NASDAQ:SOLO) where she has helped manage over $200 Million in equity and debt financing. Ms. Ingargiola also serves as a Director of The JBF Foundation Worldwide, a 501(c)(3) non-profit. Ms. Ingargiola graduated in 1989 from Boston University with a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration and a concentration in Finance. In 1996, she received her MBA in Health Administration from the University of South Florida.

Thomas Gardner. Mr. Gardner has served as a member of the Board of Directors since June 2016 and he and his firmhas been engaged as a consultant to the Company. Since May 2010, Mr. Gardner has served as COO and Director at NeuEon, Inc., a technology advisory consulting firm, where he oversees operations and provides strategic technology and business guidance to select clients. Mr. Gardner has extensive experience in the areas of business and technology leadership across many industries, including financial services, manufacturing, telecommunications and consumer goods. Within these sectors, Mr. Gardner has specific expertise in the areas of process improvement, digitization and standardization, mergers and acquisitions, system implementations, enterprise resource planning and work-force optimization. Mr. Gardner holds a dual Bachelor of Science in Accounting and Management from Bryant University. The Company believes that Mr. Gardner’s experience as a data analytics expert, along with his strategic technology and business expertise, brings a unique perspective to the Board of Directors.

 

31 

Corbett Kull. Mr. Kull has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since July 2018. Since December 8, 2014, Mr. Kull has served as senior director of marketing for The Climate Corporation, a subsidiary of Monsanto (now Bayer), which provides software, hardware and insurance products to farmers worldwide. Prior to his role at The Climate Corporation, in 2013. Kull co-founded 640 Labs, an agribusiness that leveraged the power of analytics, mobile technologies and cloud computing to help farmers capture and store in-field data. In December 2014, he sold 640 Labs to The Climate Corporation. Kull received his Master in Business Administration, with an emphasis in Marketing, from the Illinois Institute of Technology. He earned a Bachelor’s of Science in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. The Company believes that Mr. Kull’s business expertise regarding analytics, mobile technologies and cloud computing qualify Mr. Kull as a valuable member of the Board of Directors.

Board of Directors’ Term of Office

Directors are elected at our annual meeting of shareholders and serve for one year until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among the officers and directors, nor are there any arrangements or understanding between any of the Directors or Officers of our Company or any other person pursuant to which any Officer or Director was or is to be selected as an officer or director.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

During the last ten years, none of our officers, directors, promoters or control persons have been involved in any legal proceedings as described in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K.

Board Meetings; Committee Meetings; and Annual Meeting Attendance

In 2018, the Board of Directors held five meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on various matters. We encourage each director to attend our annual meeting of shareholders in person or by telephone conference call. All but one of the board members attended the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has standing audit, compensation, and nominating committees, comprised solely of independent directors. Each committee has a charter, which is available at the Company’s website, www.ageagle.com. Each committee member is independent under NYSE American committee independence requirements applicable to the committee on which such member serves.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee, which is established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent auditors, and the Company’s internal financial and accounting controls. The Audit Committee has direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention (including termination) and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors, and the Company’s independent auditors report directly to the Audit Committee. During 2018, the Audit Committee had a total of three meetings.

32 

Table of ContentsITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The Post-Merger Company’s current members of the Audit Committee are Louisa Ingargiola, Chair, Grant Begley, and Thomas Gardner. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, Mr. Scott Burell was the Chair of the Audit Committee and resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company on November 21, 2018. Ms. Louisa Ingargiola was appointed on November 27, 2018 as a director of the Board of Directors of the Company and as the Chair of the Audit Committee to replace Mr. Burell. Each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an independent director under the corporate governance standards of the NYSE American and the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has determined that Louisa Ingargiola qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is currently defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and meets the financial sophistication requirements of the NYSE American.

Compensation Committee

 

Information in responseThe Compensation Committee approves the compensation objectives for the Company, approves the compensation of the chief executive officer and approves or recommends to this item is incorporated by referencethe Board of Directors for approval the compensation of other executives. The Compensation Committee reviews all compensation components, including base salary, bonus, benefits and other perquisites.

The Post-Merger Company’s current members of the Compensation Committee are Grant Begley, Chairman, Louisa Ingargiola, and Thomas Gardner. Mr. Scott Burell was a member of the Compensation Committee and resigned from the registrant’s definitive proxy statementBoard of Directors of the Company on November 21, 2018. Ms. Louisa Ingargiola was appointed on November 27, 2018 as a director of the Board of Directors of the Company and as a member of the Compensation Committee to replace Mr. Burell’s role. During 2018, the Compensation Committee had a total of two meetings.

The members of the compensation committee are Messrs. Begley and Gardner and Ms. Ingargiola. Mr. Begley serves as chair of the compensation committee. Each member of the compensation committee is a non-employee director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act, each is an outside director as defined by Section 162(m) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and each is an independent director as defined by the NYSE American. The compensation committee has adopted a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and the NYSE American, which is available on our website.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for making recommendations to our board of directors regarding candidates for directorships and the structure and composition of our board and the board committees. In addition, the nominating and corporate governance committee will be responsible for developing and recommending to our board corporate governance guidelines applicable to the company and advising our board on corporate governance matters. During 2018, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee had no meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on one occasion.

The Post-Merger Company’s current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Thomas Gardner, Chairman, Louisa Ingargiola, and Grant Begley. Mr. Scott Burell was a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company on November 21, 2018. Ms. Louisa Ingargiola was appointed on November 27, 2018 as a director of the Board of Directors of the Company and as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to replace Mr. Burell. Each member of the nominating and corporate governance committee will be an independent director as defined by the NYSE American. The nominating and corporate governance committee has adopted a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the NYSE American, which is available on our website

33 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by security holders. Potential nominees to the Board of Directors are required to have such experience in business or financial matters as would make such nominee an asset to the Board of Directors and may, under certain circumstances, be required to be “independent”, as such term is defined under Section 121(a) of the listing standards of NYSE American and applicable SEC regulations. Security holders wishing to submit the name of a person as a potential nominee to the Board of Directors must send the name, address, and a brief (no more than 500 words) biographical description of such potential nominee to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at the following address: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, c/o AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., 117 S. 4th Street, Neodesha, Kansas 66757. Potential director nominees will be evaluated by personal interview, such interview to be conducted by one or more members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and/or any other method the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee deems appropriate, which may, but need not, include a questionnaire. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may solicit or receive information concerning potential nominees from any source it deems appropriate. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee need not engage in an evaluation process unless (i) there is a vacancy on the Board of Directors, (ii) a director is not standing for re-election, or (iii) the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not intend to recommend the nomination of a sitting director for re-election. A potential director nominee recommended by a security holder will not be evaluated differently from any other potential nominee. Although it has not done so in the past, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may retain search firms to assist in identifying suitable director candidates.

The Board does not have a formal policy on Board candidate qualifications. The Board may consider those factors it deems appropriate in evaluating director nominees made either by the Board or stockholders, including judgment, skill, strength of character, experience with businesses and organizations comparable in size or scope to the Company, experience and skill relative to other Board members, and specialized knowledge or experience. Depending upon the current needs of the Board, certain factors may be weighed more or less heavily. In considering candidates for the Board, the directors evaluate the entirety of each candidate’s credentials and do not have any specific minimum qualifications that must be met. The directors will consider candidates from any reasonable source, including current Board members, stockholders, professional search firms or other persons. The directors will not evaluate candidates differently based on who has made the recommendation.

Changes in Nominating Process

In 2018, there were no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

Compliance with Section 16(A) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, officers and stockholders who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of equity securities of the Company registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, collectively referred to herein as the “Reporting Persons,” to file initial statements of beneficial ownership of securities and statements of changes in beneficial ownership of securities with respect to the Company’s equity securities with the SEC. All Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all reports that such Reporting Persons file with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely on our review of the copies of such reports and upon written representations of the Reporting Persons received by us, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to such Reporting Persons have been timely met.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for adherence by its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to ensure honest and ethical conduct; full, fair and proper disclosure of financial information in the Company’s periodic reports filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Any person may obtain a copy of our Code of Ethics, without charge, by mailing a request to the Company at the address appearing on the front page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or by viewing it on our website found at www.ageagle.com.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In connection with the Merger, all of the EnerJex executive officers and directors resigned from their positions with EnerJex, and the officers and directors of AgEagle Sub were appointed to serve as officers and directors of the Company post-merger. EnerJex’s named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are no longer current executive officers of AgEagle. As a result, and for ease of reference we have included a separate executive compensation section to reflect the prior years’ compensation for the EnerJex executive officers and directors.

34 

Executive Compensation – AgEagle (Post-Merger)

The following table sets forth compensation information for services rendered by certain of our executive officers in all capacities during the last two completed fiscal years. The following information includes the dollar value of base salaries and certain other compensation, if any, whether paid or deferred.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Equity   Awards(4) All Other Compensation Total
Bret Chilcott (1)  2018  $120,539  $  $  $  $120,539 
   2017  $31,200  $  $  $  $31,200 
Barrett Mooney (2)  2018  $95,615  $  $54,995  $  $150,610 
   2017  $  $  $  $  $ 
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern (3)  2018  $207,500  $  $27,759  $  $235,259 
   2017  $20,000  $  $6,339  $  $26,339 

(1)Bret Chilcott served as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company until July 18, 2018, after which he stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and now serves as President.
(2)Barrett Mooney was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective July 18, 2018.
(3)Nicole Fernandez-McGovern was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective April 6, 2016. Amounts for 2018 include deferred compensation payments from 2017.
(4)The aggregate grant date fair value of the options awarded to each executive officer is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and excludes the effect of forfeiture assumptions. Also, these awards generally vest over a one period from the date of grant. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of stock option awards are Black-Scholes option valuation model.

Employment Agreements

Bret Chilcott

Mr. Chilcott has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and as President since the inception of the Company in 2010 and had served as Chief Executive Officer from February 2016 to July 18, 2018. As of July 18, 2018, Annual Stockholder MeetingMr. Chilcott stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and currently serves as President, Secretary and Chairman of Stockholders filed 120 daysthe Board of the Directors. Mr. Chilcott has no formal agreement with the Company but did hold the position of Chief Executive of the Company for an annual salary of $175,000. Upon his resignation as Chief Executive Officer of the Company his salary was reduced to $140,000, annually.

Barrett Mooney

Pursuant to an employment offer letter dated July 9, 2018, Mr. Mooney will receive as compensation for his services as Chief Executive Officer a base salary of $220,000 per year, which shall be subject to annual performance review by the Compensation Committee of the Board and may be revised by the Board, in its sole discretion. Mr. Mooney received an initial grant of 75,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company which is fully vested. Mr. Mooney shall also be eligible to receive an award of 75,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company which shall fully vest as of January 1, 2019 if, and only if, the stock price of the Company reaches $3.55 per share and the closing price per share is at or above such price at the end of the day on January 1, 2019. In addition, Mr. Mooney is eligible to receive an award of 20,000 nonqualified stock options under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) upon securing one sustainability pilot program on or before October 31, 2018, and an additional award of 30,000 nonqualified stock options under the Equity Plan upon securing a second sustainability pilot program on or before January 31, 2019. Both awards shall provide for immediate vesting and exercisability at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s shares of Common Stock underlying the options as of the date of grant. Mr. Mooney will also be eligible receive an award of up to 55,000 nonqualified stock options under the Equity Plan based upon the results of his annual performance review in the first quarter of 2019.

35 

Effective December 18, 2018, an amendment was signed for the original employment offer letter dated July 9, 2018 hereby providing an amendment to provide that in lieu of the issuance of 75,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company (the “Shares”), the Company shall award to Executive 125,000 Nonqualified Stock Options (the “Stock Options”) under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”). The Stock Options shall be subject to the terms of the Equity Plan and standard option award agreement which shall have a term of 10 years and provide for vesting over a one-year period and exercisability at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock as of the date of the grant. The award of 75,000 shares were returned to the company and immediately cancelled.

Nicole Fernandez-McGovern

Based on her agreement commencing with the date of appointment as CFO in August 2016, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern earned a salary of $66,000 per year, payable in monthly installments of $5,500 for 2017. In 2018, her monthly installment payment increased to $8,000 and effective upon the closing of the Merger, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern’s salary increased to $150,000. As part of her compensation upon the closing of the Merger, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern also received 10-year stock options to purchase 265,033 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.06 per share, of which half of the options vested upon issuance and the remainder will vest equally over two years. Additionally, on a quarterly basis, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern will be awarded 12,500 shares of stock options to purchase Common Stock at an exercise price per share equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issuance during the term of her employment.

Effective January 1, 2019, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern signed a new employment agreement with the Company, whereby her annual base salary increased to $180,000 and a ten-year grant of 50,000 stock options to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.54 was awarded. In addition, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern will continue to receive quarterly grants of 12,000 stock options to purchase Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issue during the term of her employment. All of the awards will vest equally over two years.

We have no other formal employment agreements with our executive officers, nor any compensatory plans or arrangements resulting from the resignation, retirement or any other termination of our named executive officers, from a change-in-control, or from a change in any executive officer’s responsibilities following a change-in-control. However, it is possible we will enter into formal employment agreements with our executive officers in the future.

36 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018 and 2017 Year-Ends

The following table lists the outstanding equity incentive awards held by the EnerJex Pre-Merger Named Executive Officers as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Option Awards
Name and Principal Position Fiscal Year Granted Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Un-Exercisable (#) Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date
Barrett Mooney  2018   4,452   120,548     $0.62   12/17/2028 
Chief Executive Officer  2017           $    
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern  2018   3,125   9,375     $1.82   6/29/2023 
Chief Financial Officer  2018   1,563   10,938     $1.64   9/29/2023 
   2017   215,340   49,693     $0.06   10/02/2027 
Bret Chilcott  2018           $    
President  2017           $    

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

We do not have any contract, agreement, plan or arrangement that provides for any payment to any of our Named Executive Officers at, following, or in connection with a termination of the employment of such Named Executive Officer, a change in control of the Company or a change in such Named Executive Officer’s responsibilities.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION – AGEAGLE (POST-MERGER)

Pursuant to their respective offer letters, Messers Grant Begley, Thomas Gardner and Scott Burell are entitled to receive for their service on the Board: (1) an initial grant of five-year options to purchase 77,356 shares of Common Stock as accrued for time served as a Board member at an exercise price of $0.06 per share that vested half upon issuance and the remainder is vesting equally over two years; and (2) additional five-year options to purchase 16,500 shares of Common Stock issuable per calendar quarter of service at an exercise price per share equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issuance that will vest equally over two years.

Pursuant to his offer letter Mr. Corbett Kull is entitled to receive for his service on the board: (1) an initial grant of five-year options to purchase 41,250 shares of Common Stock upon appointment, which was at an exercise price of $1.77 (equal to the market price of our Common Stock on the date of grant) that will vest in equal installments every calendar quarter over a one year period; and (2) five-year options to purchase 16,500 shares of Common Stock per calendar quarter of service at an exercise price per share equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issuance that will vest in equal installments every calendar quarter for the two-year period after date the grant.

Effective November 21, 2018, Mr. Scott Burell resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company and his positions as a member of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Chairman of the Audit Committee. As a result of his resignation, Mr. Burell did not receive any options for the last quarter of 2018 as options are awarded upon completion of the term. To replace Mr. Burell, Ms. Louisa Ingargiola was appointed on November 27, 2018 as a director of the Board of Directors of the Company, a member of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Chairman of the Audit Committee.

Pursuant to her offer letter, Ms. Louisa Ingargiola is entitled to receive for her service on the board: (1) an initial grant of five-year options to purchase 41,250 shares of Common Stock upon appointment, which was at an exercise price of $0.77 (equal to the market price of our Common Stock on the date of grant) that will vest in equal installments every calendar quarter over a one year period; and (2) five-year options to purchase 16,500 shares of Common Stock per calendar quarter of service at an exercise price per share equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issuance that will vest in equal installments every calendar quarter for the two year period after date the grant.

37 

Option Exercises for Fiscal 2018 and 2017

Mr. Scott Burell exercised 60,724 options on December 4, 2018 at an exercise price of $0.06 of which 55,801 shares were delivered due to the Company’s withholding obligation relating to the exercise of these options.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION – ENERJEX (PRE-MERGER)

The following table sets forth summary compensation information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017, for our former chief executive officer, former chief financial officer and other former highly compensated executive officers. We did not have any other executive officers as of the end of 2018 or 2017, whose total compensation exceeded $100,000. We refer to these persons as the EnerJex Pre-Merger Named Executive Officers elsewhere in this report.

Name and Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Stock Awards Option Awards All Other Compensation Total
Louis G. Schott, Former Interim  2018  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Chief Executive Officer and Secretary (1)  2017  $75,000  $  $  $  $  $75,000 
Robert Schleizer, Former Chief  2018  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Financial Officer (4)  2017  $75,000  $  $  $  $  $75,000 
Robert G. Watson, Jr., Former  2018  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
President, Chief Executive Officer (2)  2017  $15,000  $  $  $  $  $15,000 
Douglas M. Wright, Former Chief  2018  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Financial Officer (3)  2017  $96,000  $  $  $  $  $96,000 
David L. Kunovic, Former Executive  2018  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Vice President, Exploration (5)  2017  $108,865  $  $  $  $  $108,865 
Kent A. Roach, Former Executive  2018  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Vice President, Engineering (5)  2017  $108,865  $  $  $  $  $108,865 

(1)Mr. Schott joined the Company as Interim CEO on February 10, 2017 and resigned in connection with the Merger.
(2)Mr. Watson resigned as a director and officer of the Company on February 10, 2017.
(3)Mr. Wright resigned on February 10, 2017.
(4)Mr. Schleizer joined the Company as Chief Financial Officer on August 17, 2017 and resigned in connection with the Merger.
(5)Resigned in connection with the Merger.

Employment Agreements

Louis G. Schott. — Former Interim Chief Executive Officer

On February 10, 2017, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Louis G. Schott, as interim chief executive officer of the Company. The employment agreement provides an annual base salary of $225,000. Mr. Schott resigned from his position as interim chief executive officer in connection with the Merger and his employment agreement was terminated.

Option Exercises for Fiscal 2018 and 2017

There were no options exercised by the EnerJex Pre-Merger Named Executive Officers in fiscal years 2018 and 2017, as all pre-merger options issued by EnerJex were cancelled upon the date of Merger.

38 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2018 and 2017

We granted to Mr. Wright an option expiring on July 31, 2017, to purchase 50,000 shares of our Common Stock at a cash exercise price equal to $10.50. One third of the options vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and the remaining options vest in twenty-four (24) equal tranches each month for the next two (2) year period. Mr. Wright’s employment with the company ended effective February 17, 2017, and therefore pursuant to the 2013 Plan he must exercise the options within three (3) months of employment termination (May 17, 2017) or forfeit them. The options were not exercised

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

The following table lists the outstanding equity incentive awards held by the EnerJex Pre-Merger Named Executive Officers as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

 

  Option Awards
  Fiscal Year Granted Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Un-Exercisable (#) Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date
David L. Kunovic  2013   50,000        $10.50  12/31/23
Kent A. Roach  2014   39,743   10,417     $10.50  12/31/19

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION – ENERJEX (Pre-Merger)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the EnerJex Pre-Merger non-employee directors received no compensation.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of March 27, 2019 by:

39 

each person, or group of affiliated persons, known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock;
each of our current directors;
each of our named executive officers; and
all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.

The information in the following table has been presented in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Under such rules, beneficial ownership of a class of capital stock includes any shares of such class as to which a person, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power or investment power and also any shares as to which a person has the right to acquire such voting or investment power within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. If two or more persons share voting power or investment power with respect to specific securities, each such person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of such securities. Except as we otherwise indicate below and under applicable community property laws, we believe that the beneficial owners of the Common Stock listed below, based on information they have furnished to us, have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. Except as otherwise indicated, each stockholder named in the table is assumed to have sole voting and investment power with respect to the number of shares listed opposite the stockholder’s name.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) Number of Shares(2) Percent of Class
Bret Chilcott  5,800,321   46.22%
Chairman of the Board, President and Nominee Director        
Barrett Mooney  4,452   0.04%
Chief Executive Officer(3)        
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern  220,027   1.75%
Chief Financial Officer(3)        
Grant Begley  75,227   0.60%
Nominee Director(3)        
Thomas Gardner  142,519   1.14%
Nominee Director(3)        
Louisa Ingargiola  1,921   0.02%
Director(3)        
Corbett Kull  20,969   0.17%
Nominee Director(3)        
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (seven persons)  6,265,436   49.94%
GreenBlock Capital, LLC  846,569   6.75%
420 Royal Palm Way        
Palm Beach, Florida 33480(4)        
Alpha Capital Anstalt  1,253,684   9.99%
Pradafant 7, Furstentums 9490        
Vaduz, Liechtenstein(5)        

(1)Unless otherwise indicated, such individual’s address is c/o AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., 117 South 4thStreet, Neodesha, Kansas 66757.

40 

(2)The persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock reflected as beneficially owned by them. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within sixty (60) days from December 31, 2018 and the total outstanding shares used to calculate each beneficial owner’s percentage includes such shares, although such shares are not taken into account in the calculations of the total number of shares or percentage of outstanding shares. Beneficial ownership as reported does not include shares subject to option or conversion that are not exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2018.
(3)All shares reflected are those shares of Common Stock which underlie options issued and fully vested, as of December 31, 2018.
(4)Excludes options to purchase 207,055 shares of Common Stock which are subject to vesting and ownership limitation provisions. Mr. Chris Spencer, a Partner of GreenBlock Capital, LLC, has sole investment and voting power with respect to the shares. The address for GreenBlock Capital, LLC is 420 Royal Palm Way, Palm Beach, Florida 33480. Information regarding this beneficial owner is furnished in reliance upon its Schedule 13G, dated March 26, 2018.
(5)As of December 31, 2018, Alpha owned 315,422 shares of Common Stock and owned 4,662 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which are currently convertible into 8,633,333 shares of Common Stock, and 2,000 Series D Preferred Shares and 3,703,703 warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.54. The table includes only 1,253,684 shares of Common Stock that Alpha is deemed to beneficially own because under the terms of the Series C Certificate of Designation, the holder thereof may not own in excess of 9.99% of the Company’s voting (i.e., Common) stock at any given time.

Equity Compensation Plans

Company 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

The 2017 Omnibus Equity Plan is a comprehensive incentive compensation plan under which the Company can grant equity-based and other incentive awards to officers, employees and directors of, and consultants and advisers to, the Company The purpose of the Plan is to help the Company attract, motivate and retain such persons and thereby enhance shareholder value. The Plan provides for the grant of awards which are incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), unrestricted shares , restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, SARs, tandem stock appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, or any combination of the foregoing, to key management employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (each a “participant”) (however, solely Company employees or employees of the Company’s subsidiaries are eligible for incentive stock option awards). The Company has reserved a total of 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance as or under awards to be made under the Plan.

Types of Stock Awards

The Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. Stock options may be granted to employees, including officers, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company or its affiliates, except that incentive stock options may be granted only to employees.

Share Reserve

The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that have been reserved for issuance under the Plan is 2,000,000. As of December 31, 2018, there are 1,287,103 shares underlying options granted under the Plan and 712,897 shares of Common Stock available for future issuance under the Plan. If a stock option award expires, terminates, is canceled or is forfeited for any reason, the number of shares subject to the stock option award will again be available for issuance. In addition, if stock awards are settled in cash, the share reserve will be reduced by the number of shares of Common Stock with a value equal to the amount of the cash distributions as of the time that such amount was determined and if stock options are exercised using net exercise, the share reserve will be reduced by the gross number of shares of Common Stock subject to the exercised portion of the option. We also have 207,055 shares underlying options that have been granted outside of the Plan.

41 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.Administration

 

InformationOur board of directors or a duly authorized committee thereof, has the authority to administer the Plan. Subject to the terms of the Plan, our board of directors or the authorized committee, referred to herein as the committee, determines recipients, dates of grant, the numbers and types of stock awards to be granted and the terms and conditions of the stock option awards, including the period of exercisability and vesting schedule applicable to a stock option award. Subject to the limitations set forth below, the committee will also determine the exercise price and the types of consideration to be paid for the award. The committee has the authority to modify outstanding awards under the Plan. The committee has the authority to adopt, alter and repeal administrative rules, guidelines and practices governing the Plan and to perform all other acts, including delegating administrative responsibilities, as it deems advisable to construe and interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan and any stock option award granted under the Plan. Decisions and interpretations or other actions by the committee are in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meetingdiscretion of Stockholders filed 120 days after December 31, 2017.the committee and are final binding and conclusive on the company and all participants in the Plan.

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.Stock Options

 

InformationIncentive stock options and non-qualified stock options are granted pursuant to stock option award agreements adopted by the committee. The committee determines the exercise price for a stock option, within the terms and conditions of the Plan, provided that the exercise price shall not be less than (i) in responsethe case of a grant of any NQSO or an ISO to this itema key employee who at the time of the grant does not own stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock or of any subsidiary, one hundred percent (100%) of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as determined on the date the stock option award is incorporatedgranted; (ii) in the case of a grant of an ISO to a key employee who, at the time of grant, owns stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock or of any subsidiary, one hundred ten percent (110%) of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock, as determined on the date the stock option award is granted. The fair market value of the Common Stock for purposes of determining the exercise price shall be determined by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statementCommittee in accordance with any reasonable method of valuation consistent with applicable requirements of Federal tax law, including, as applicable, the provisions of Code Section 422(c)(8) and 409A as applicable. Stock options granted under the Plan will become exercisable at the rate specified by the committee and may be exercisable for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days after December 31, 2017.restricted stock, if determined by the committee.

 

The committee determines the term of stock options granted under the Plan, up to a maximum of ten years. The option holder’s stock option agreement shall provide the rights, if any, that such holder has to exercise the stock option at such time that such holder’s service relationship with us, or any of our affiliates, ceases for any reason, including disability, death, with or without cause, or voluntary resignation. All unvested stock option awards are forfeited if the participant’s employment or service is terminated for any reason, unless our compensation committee determines otherwise.

Acceptable consideration for the purchase of Common Stock issued upon the exercise of a stock option will be determined by the committee and may include (i) check, bank draft or money order, or wire transfer, (ii) if the Company’s Common Stock is publicly traded, a broker-assisted cashless exercise, or (iii) such other methods as may be approved by the committee, including without limitation, the tender of shares of our Common Stock previously owned by the option holder or a net exercise of the option.

Unless the committee provides otherwise, options generally are not transferable except by will, the laws of descent and distribution. The committee may provide that a non-qualified stock option may be transferred to a family member, as such term is defined under the applicable securities laws.

42 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.Tax Limitations on Incentive Stock Options

 

Information in responseThe aggregate fair market value, determined at the time of grant, of our Common Stock with respect to this itemincentive stock options that are exercisable for the first time by an option holder during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. Options or portions thereof that exceed such limit will generally be treated as non-qualified stock options. No incentive stock option may be granted to any person who, at the time of the grant, owns or is incorporated by referencedeemed to own stock possessing more than 10% of our total combined voting power or that of any of our affiliates unless (i) the option exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the stock subject to the option on the date of grant, and (ii) the term of the incentive stock option does not exceed five years from the registrant’s definitive proxy statementdate of grant.

Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure and other Special Transactions

In the event of a stock dividend, stock split, or recapitalization, or a corporate reorganization in which we are a surviving corporation (and our shareholders prior to such transaction continue to own at least 50% of our capital stock after such transaction), including without limitation a merger, consolidation, split-up or spin-off, or a liquidation, or distribution of securities or assets other than cash dividends, the number or kinds of shares subject to the Plan or to any stock option award previously granted, and the exercise price, shall be adjusted proportionately by the committee to reflect such event.

In the event of a merger, consolidation, or other form of reorganization with or into another corporation (other than a merger, consolidation, or other form of reorganization in which we are the surviving corporation and our shareholders prior to such transaction continue to own at least 50% of the capital stock after such transaction), a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or a tender or exchange offer made by any corporation, person or entity (other than an offer made by us), all stock options held by any option holder shall be fully vested and exercisable by the option holder.

Furthermore, the committee, either before or after the merger, consolidation or other form of reorganization, may take such action as it determines in its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meetingsole discretion with respect to the number or kinds of Stockholders filed 120 days aftershares subject to the Plan or any option under the Plan.

Amendment, Suspension or Termination

The committee may at any time amend, suspend, or terminate any and all parts of the Plan, any stock option award granted under the Plan, or both in such respects as the committee shall deem necessary or desirable, except that no such action may be taken which would impair the rights of any option holder with respect to any stock option award previously granted under the Plan without the option holder’s consent.

Description of Securities

Our authorized capital stock consists of 275,000,000 shares, of which 250,000,000 shares are designated as Common Stock par value $.001 per share, and 25,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock, par value $.001 per share of which (i) no shares have been designated as Series A Preferred Stock, (ii) 1,764 shares have been designated as Series B Preferred Stock, (ii) 10,000 shares have been designated as Series C Preferred Stock and (iii) 2,000 shares have been designated as Series D Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2018, we had 12,549,394 shares of Common Stock, no shares of Series A Preferred Stock, 0 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 4,662 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and 2,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock outstanding.

43 

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

AgEagle is a party to a consulting agreement dated as of March 1, 2015 with GreenBlock Capital, LLC, or GreenBlock, which beneficially owns approximately 8.33% of our Common Stock. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to issue 368,099 (post-split) shares of the Company’s Common Stock on May 1, 2015, an additional 368,099 (post-split) shares of Common Stock on January 15, 2016 and 207,055 (post-split) stock options exercisable for five years from the issuance date at an exercise price per share of $0.06 pursuant to the consulting agreement. As of December 31, 2015, no shares had been issued to the consultant. The Company recognized $1,250,000 of consulting expense during 2015 and 2016 related to the value of the shares earned, which was based on the estimated fair value of the stock as of December 31, 2015, based on the terms of a transaction which ultimately closed in February 2016, as there was no dis-incentive for non-performance. No additional expense was recorded for the nine months September 30, 2017 for the Common Stock granted in connection with the strategic consulting agreement executed in March 2015. During 2015, AgEagle recorded $69,528 of non-cash compensation expense related to the vested stock options granted to GreenBlock. The consulting agreement terminated by mutual agreement of the parties on August 31, 2016. During 2016, AgEagle recognized $138,802 related to the stock options. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized $6,397 of additional consulting expense related to the issuance of the Common Stock for the stock options as a result of the modification of the exercise price of the options from $2.60 per share to $0.10 per share.

On (i) December 15, 2016, the Company issued a promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $30,000 to GreenBlock Capital, a related party, (ii) January 24, 2017, AgEagle issued a 2nd promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $30,000 to GreenBlock, and (iii) June 14, 2017, a 3rd promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $16,050 was issued to GreenBlock (the “Related Party Notes A”). The Related Party Notes A accrue interest at an annual rate of 2% and matured on November 6, 2017. On or about August 1, 2017, GreenBlock entered into extension and modification agreements with AgEagle whereby they agreed to extend the maturity date of the Related Party Notes A to February 28, 2018, and in exchange a conversion feature was added whereby the debt can be converted into AgEagle Common Stock at $2.00 per share, and amended the interest rate on the note retroactively to accrue at a rate of 8% annually.

Between the dates of March 15 and July 12, 2017, AgEagle issued seven new promissory notes totaling an aggregate amount of $55,000 to Bret Chilcott, who is our Chairman of the Board and President, and at the time was also our CEO. The promissory notes (the “Related Party Notes B”) accrue interest at an annual rate of 2% and matured on November 6, 2017. On or about August 1, 2017, Mr. Chilcott entered into extension and modification agreements with AgEagle whereby they agreed to extend the maturity date of the Related Party Notes B to February 28, 2018, and in exchange a conversion feature was added whereby the debt can be converted into AgEagle Common Stock at $2.00 per share, and amended the interest rate on the note retroactively to accrue at a rate of 8% annually.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has reviewed the independence of our directors based on the listing standards of the NYSE American. Based on this review, the Board of Directors determined that each of Messrs. Begley, Gardner and Kull and Ms. Ingargiola are independent within the meaning of the NYSE American. In making this determination, our Board of Directors considered the relationships that each of these non-employee directors has with us and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence. As required under applicable NYSE American rules, we anticipate that our independent directors will meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present.

44 

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.Audit Fees

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference fromOur independent auditor, D. Brooks and Associates CPA’s billed an aggregate of $32,078 for the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days afteryear ended December 31, 2017.2018 audit and the quarterly reviews for the year ended December 31, 2018. D. Brooks and Associates CPA’s billed $26,076 for the December 31, 2017 audit, quarterly reviews for the year ended December 31, 2017 and audit related fees. In addition, $17,515 and $1,400 was billed for tax services in 2018 and 2017, respectively. Audit Fees and Audit Related Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for auditing our Financial Statements, reviews of interim Financial Statements included in quarterly reports, services performed in connection with other filings with the Securities & Exchange Commission and related comfort letters and other services that are normally provided by our independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Tax Fees consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and local tax compliance and consultation in connection with various transactions and acquisitions. All Other Fees consists of fees billed for professional services associated with the consent by auditors related to the audited financial statements of EnerJex and Agribotix and not paid to D.Brooks and Associates CPA’s.

 

  2018 2017
Audit Fees $32,078  $26,076 
Audit-Related Fees  1,000   1,064 
Tax Fees  17,515   1,400 
All Other Fees  21,000    
Total $71,593  $28,540 

 43

45 

 

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

The following information required under this item is filed as part of this report:

99.ITEM 15.Financial Statements

Page
Management Responsibility for Financial Information44
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting45
Index to Financial StatementsF-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsF-2
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-4
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders EquityF-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-7EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES

 

2. Financial Statement Schedules

None.

3. Exhibit Index

Exhibit
No.
 Description
   
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger between Millennium Plastics Corporation and Midwest Energy, Inc. filed on August 16, 2006. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2006)
2.2Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Registrant, BRE Merger Sub, Inc., Black Raven Energy, Inc. and West Coast Opportunity Fund, LLC dated July 23, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 on Form 8-K filed July 29, 2013)
2.3Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of October 19, 2017, by and among EnerJex Resources, Inc., AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 20, 2017).
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Appendix C to Schedule 14A filed on June 6, 2013)
3.3Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 29, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2014)
3.43.3 Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2014)
3.53.4 Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Form S-1/A filed on June 3, 2014)
3.6Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
3.73.5 Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 27, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2018)
4.13.6 Specimen common stock certificateAmendment to Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.33.3 to the Form S-1/A filed on May 27, 2008)
4.2Specimen Series A Preferred Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form S-1/A filed on June 3, 2014)
4.3Specimen Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.2 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)29, 2018)
4.43.7 Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2011).
4.53.8 FormAmended and Restated Certificate of Warrant to Purchase CommonDesignation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the 10% Series A Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.3 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)

 44

4.6Form of Placement Agent Warrant (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.4 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
10.1Form of Officer and Director Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23.1 to the Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2008)March 29, 2018)
3.9Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the 10% Series A Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.10Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of EnerJex Resources, Inc. to change the company’s name (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.11Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of EnerJex Resources, Inc. to effect a 1-for-25 reverse stock split (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.12Articles of Merger, dated March 26, 2018, by and between AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc.(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.6 on Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.13Amended and Restated Bylaws, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Appendix C to Schedule 14A filed on May 22, 2013)
3.14Certificate of Designation of Series D 8% Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on December 26, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2018)
4.1Form of 8% Convertible Debenture due November 6, 2016 (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on July 24, 2018)

46 

4.2Form of 8% Convertible Debenture due June 30, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on July 24, 2018)
4.3Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated as of December 27, 2018 issued to Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2018)
10.2 Amendment 4 to Joint ExplorationIncubator Lease Agreement, effective asdated August 28, 2015, between the City of November 6, 2008 between MorMeg, LLCNeodosha, Kansas and EnerJex Resources, Inc.  (incorporatedthe Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registration Statement on Form 10-KS-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on July 14, 2009)24, 2018)
10.3 Amendment 5 to Joint Exploration Agreement effective as2017 Equity Incentive Plan of December 31, 2009 between MorMeg LLC and EnerJex Resources, Inc. (incorporatedthe Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registration Statement on Form 10-Q filed on February 16, 2010)
10.4Amendment 6 to Joint Exploration Agreement effective as of March 31, 2010 between MorMeg LLC and EnerJex Resources, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Form 10-KS-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on July 15, 2010)24, 2018)
10.5 AmendedAgreement, dated May 13, 2016, between the Registrant and Restated EnerJex Resources, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (incorporatedBotlink, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-KS-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on October 16, 2008)July 24, 2018 )

10.6 Joint Development Agreement between EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Haas Petroleum, LLC dated December 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2011).
10.7 Joint Operating AgreementOffer Letter, dated July 9, 2017, between EnerJex Resources, Inc.the Registrant and Haas Petroleum, LLC and MorMeg, LLC dated December 31, 2010Barrett Mooney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2011).
10.8Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 3, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2011).July 19, 2018)
10.910.8 Option and Joint Development Agreement by and among Registrant and MorMeg, LLCForm of Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure, dated August 2011March 26, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2011).March 29, 2018)
10.1010.9 First AmendmentForm of Release and Covenant Not to Amended and Restated Credit AgreementSue, dated December 14, 2011March 26, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2011).March 29, 2018)
10.1110.10 Second Amendment to AmendedForm of Promissory Note between EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Restated Credit AgreementPass Creek Resources, LLC dated August 31, 2012March 26, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2012).
10.12Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 2, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2012).
10.13Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among Registrant and Robert G. Watson, Jr. dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2013).
10.14Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2013).
10.15First Amendment to Amended & Restated Mortgage Security Agreement, Financing Statement and Assignment of Production by and among Working Interest, LLC and Texas Capital Bank dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2013).March 29, 2018)
10.1610.11 Mortgage, SecurityForm of Additional Issuance and Exchange Agreement, Financing Statement and Assignment of Production and Revenuesdated March 26, 2018, by and among Working Interest, LLCEnerJex Resources, Inc. and Texas Capital Bank dated December 31, 2012the investor named therein, relating to the purchase of shares of Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2013).
10.17March 29, 2018)2013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 12, 2013)
10.18Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated September 30, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed October 1, 2013).
10.19Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated November 19, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 on Form 10-Q filed May 13, 2014).
10.20Exchange Agreement between EnerJex Resources, Inc. and holders of Series A preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 on Form S-1/A Amendment No. 2 filed June 3, 2014).
10.21Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated May 22, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed May 27, 2014).
10.22Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 11, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
10.23Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated August 13, 2014 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.23 on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2015).
10.24Ninth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated April 29, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed May 5, 2015).
10.25Purchase Agreement by and among Registrant and Northland Securities, Inc. dated May 8, 2015 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 1.1 of Form 8-K filed May 8, 2015.)
10.26Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated September 8, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of Form 10-Q filed November 16, 2015).
10.27Eleventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated November 16, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed November 16, 2015).
10.28Forbearance Agreement dated April 4, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed June 3, 2016).
   

 45

10.2910.12 Third Amendment to Forbearance Agreement dated July 29, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2016.
10.30Letter Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and among Texas Capital Bank, N.A., Iberia Bank, PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, EnerJex Resources, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Black Raven Energy, Inc. and Adena, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.31Loan Sale Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and among Texas Capital Bank, N.A., Iberia Bank, PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, EnerJex Resources, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Black Raven Energy, Inc., and Adena, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.32Consulting Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and between Registrant and Douglas Wright (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.33Employment Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and between Registrant and Louis G. Schott (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.34Separation and General Release Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and between Registrant and Robert G. Watson, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2017).
10.35Form of Additional Issuance Agreement among Enerjex Resources, Inc. and Alpha Capital Anstalt effective as of April 27, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2017).
10.36Form of Services Agreement among EnerJex Resources, Inc., and Camber Energy, Inc. dated April 27, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2017).
10.37Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017, by and among the Registrant, EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Raven Energy, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Adena, LLC, Working Interest, LLC, Kansas Holdings, LLC and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2017).
10.38Amended and Restated Note dated May 10, 2017, by and among the Registrant, EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Raven Energy, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Adena, LLC, Working Interest, LLC, Kansas Holdings, LLC and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2017).
10.39Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts dated May 10, 2017, by and between the Registrant and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2017).
10.40Secured Promissory Note dated July 14, 2017, by Registrant and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2017).
10.41Voting Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2017, by and among EnerJex Resources, Inc. and a principal stockholder of AgEagle (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 20, 2017).
10.4210.13 Private Placement Commitment LetterForm of Exchange Agreement dated November 21,20, 2017 between the Registrant and Agribotix LLC (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on July 24, 2018)
10.14Form of Agribotix Distribution and Resale Agreement dated November 20, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on July 24, 2018)

47 

10.15Form of AgEagle Dealer Agreement (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on July 24, 2018
10.16ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT, dated as of July 25, 2018, into by and among the Company(i) Registrant, (ii) EAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant, (iii) AGRIBOTIX, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, (iv) the individuals listed on the signature page thereof, and (v) Paul Hoff, in his capacity as the representative of the Seller Investor. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2018).
10.17Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 27, 2018, by and between the Registrant and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Form S-4 Registration Statement filed with the SEC on November 22, 2017).
10.43Private Placement Agreement dated as of November 21, 2017, by and among EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporatedherein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 27, 2017).December 28, 2018)
10.4410.18 Stock Purchase AgreementRegistration Rights Agreements, dated as of December 20, 2017,27, 2018, by and between EnerJex Resources, Inc.the Registrant and the Purchaser theretoAlpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 22, 2017).
10.45First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 22, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2017).
10.46Second Amended and Restated Note December 22, 2017 (incorporatedherein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2017).28, 2018)
10.19*Offer Letter for Nicole Fernandez-McGovern dated January 1, 2019
10.20*AgEagle Employee Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement between AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc and Nicole Fernandez-McGovern dated January 1, 2019
10.21*Colorado Commercial Lease Agreement by and between Advanced Radar Company and Agribotix LLC, dated June 1, 2018
10.22*AgEagle Building Lease Extension Letter dated August, 17, 2018
10.4714.1 Letter Agreement dated January 31, 2018 from EnerJex Resources, Inc. (incorporatedCode of Ethics of the Registrant Applicable To Directors, Officers And Employees (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current ReportRegistration Statement on Form 8-KS-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed with the SEC on February 6,July 24, 2018).
21.121.1* Subsidiaries*List of Subsidiaries
23.131.1* ConsentRule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Cobb & Associates, Inc.*principal executive officer
31.131.2* Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*principal financial officer
31.232.1* Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*principal executive officer
32.132.2* Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**principal financial officer and principal accounting officer
32.2 Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
99.1Cobb & Associates Letter Report dated*
101.INS XBRL Instance Document*INSTANCE DOCUMENT
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*
TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

* Filed herewith.herewith

** Furnished herewith.

 46

48 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements ofIn accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amended report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

ENERJEX RESOURCES,AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.
   
Dated : March 28, 2019By:/s/ Louis G. SchottBarrett Mooney
 

Louis G. Schott 

Interim

Barrett Mooney
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) 

   
Date:Dated : March 23, 201828, 2019By:/s/ Nicole Fernandez-McGovern
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern
Chief Financial Officer

 


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NameContentsTitleDatePage No.
  
/s/ Louis G. SchottInterim Chief Executive Officer,March 23, 2018
Louis G. Schott(Principal Executive Officer), Secretary
/s/ Robert SchleizerInterim Chief Financial OfficerMarch 23, 2018
Robert Schleizer (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)
/s/ Ryan A. LoweDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Ryan A. Lowe
/s/ Lance W. HelfertDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Lance Helfert
/s/ James G. MillerDirectorMarch 23, 2018
James G. Miller
/s/ Richard E. MenchacaDirectorMarch 23, 2018
Richard E. Menchaca

 47

Index to Financial Statements

Page
Index to Financial StatementsF-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172018 and 20162017F-3
  
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 20172018 and 20162017F-4
  
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) Equity for the YearYears Ended December 31, 20172018 and 20162017F-5
  
Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 20172018 and 20162017F-6
  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7


F-1

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To Thethe Board of Directors and
Stockholders of

EnerJex ResourcesAgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EnerJex Resources,AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (the “Company”),Company) as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficitequity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”)statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CompanyAgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, generated negative cash flows from operating activities, has an accumulated deficit and has stated that substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's evaluation of the events and conditions and management’s plans in regarding these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Company’sits internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

//s// RBSM, LLP 

 

New York, New York

March 23, 2018

D. Brooks and Associates CPA’s, P.A

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 20142015.

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida

March 28, 2019

 

New York | Washington, DC | California | Nevada D. Brooks and Associates CPA’s, P.A. 4440 PGA Blvd., Suite 104, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 – (561) 429-6225

China | India | Greece 

Member ANTEA INTERNATIONAL with offices worldwide


F-2

EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Assets        
Current Assets:        
Cash unrestricted $677,936  $128,035 
Restricted cash     50,000 
Accounts receivable  143,799   600,255 
Derivative receivable     10,570 
Inventory     185,733 
Marketable securities     210,990 
Deposits and prepaid expenses  223,648   493,384 
Total current assets  1,045,383   1,678,967 
         
Non-current assets:        
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $618,661 and $1,817,711  178,115   2,077,055 
Oil & gas properties using full cost accounting, net of accumulated DD&A of $8,597,539 and $15,189,716  1,411,225   3,437,030 
Other non-current assets     798,809 
Total non-current assets  1,589,340   6,312,894 
Total assets $2,634,723  $7,991,861 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ (Deficit)        
         
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $217,941  $294,241 
Accrued liabilities  1,034,827   1,535,165 
Current portion of long term debt  4,876,903   17,925,000 
Total current liabilities  6,129,671   19,754,406 
         
Non-Current Liabilities:        
Asset retirement obligation  1,611,845   3,314,191 
Other long-term liabilities  6,919,579   3,401,149 
Total non-current liabilities  8,531,424   6,715,340 
Total liabilities  14,661,095   26,469,746 
         
Commitments and Contingencies        
         
Stockholders’ (Deficit):        
10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 1,999,998 and 938,248 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  2,000   938 
Series B Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 1,764 shares authorized, 352 and 1,764 issued and outstanding, respectively  1   2 
Series C Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 500 shares authorized, 300 and 0 issued and outstanding, respectively  1    
Series C Convertible Preferred stock issuable  200,000    
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 16,294,891 and 8,423,936 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  16,295   8,424 
Paid in capital  74,185,091   69,090,613 
Accumulated deficit  (86,429,760)  (87,577,862)
Total stockholders’ (deficit)  (12,026,372)  (18,477,885)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ (deficit) $2,634,723  $7,991,861 

 

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  As of December 31,
ASSETS 2018 2017
CURRENT ASSETS:        
 Cash $2,601,730  $35,289 
 Accounts receivable  93   255 
 Inventories  149,482   158,632 
 Prepaid and other current assets  80,370   3,384 
 Total current assets  2,831,675   197,560 
         
 Property and equipment, net  28,374   38,703 
 Investment in unconsolidated investee     75,000 
 Intangible assets, net  677,118    
 Goodwill  3,270,984    
 Total assets $6,808,151   311,263 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
 Accounts payable $197,827  $426,154 
 Accrued expenses  41,841   59,354 
 Accrued interest  1,333   185,335 
 Contract liability  4,892    
 Payroll liabilities  13,521   5,521 
 Convertible notes payable     1,160,005 
 Promissory note  40,998    
 Promissory notes - related party     131,050 
 Total current liabilities  300,412   1,967,419 
 Total liabilities  300,412   1,967,419 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (SEE NOTE 11)        
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT):        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized:        
Preferred stock, Series B, $0.001 par value, 0 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018      
Preferred stock, Series C Convertible, $0.001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, 4,662 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018  5    
Preferred stock, Series D Convertible, $0.001 par value, 2,000 shares authorized, 2,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018  2    
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 12,549,394 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018  12,549    
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 4,200,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017     420 
Additional paid-in capital  12,171,274   1,939,832 
Accumulated deficit  (5,676,091)  (3,596,408)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) $6,507,739  $(1,656,156)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $6,808,151  $311,263 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

F-3

 

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS, INC.

EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Statements of Operations

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Crude oil revenues $1,309,496  $2,390,024 
Natural gas revenues  19,509   71,703 
Total revenues  1,329,005   2,461,727 
         
Expenses:        
Direct operating costs  1,363,946   2,661,258 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  346,197   413,967 
Impairment of oil and gas assets     8,032,670 
Professional fees  1,390,512   310,471 
Salaries  350,863   1,723,789 
Administrative expense  545,267   458,375 
Total expenses  3,996,785   13,600,530 
Loss from operations  (2,667,780)  (11,138,803)
         
Other income (expense):        
Interest expense  (1,250,191)  (1,911,906)
Gain on loan sale agreement  11,500,124    
(Loss) on mark to market of derivative contracts     (2,531,401)
Other income  692,879   2,406,340 
Total other income (expense)  10,942,812   (2,036,967)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  8,275,032   (13,175,770)
Provision for income taxes      
         
Net income (loss) $8,275,032  $(13,175,770)
         
Net income (loss) $8,275,032  $(13,175,770)
Beneficial Conversion on Series C Preferred Stock  (208,500)   
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution provision  (3,400,000)   
Preferred dividends  (3,518,430)  (3,010,211)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $1,148,102  $(16,185,981)
Net income (loss) per common share basic $0.11  $(1.92)
Weighted average shares basic  10,503,070   8,423,936 
Net income (loss) per common share diluted $0.11  $(1.92)
Weighted average shares diluted  10,503,070   8,423,936 
  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2018 2017
 Revenues $107,813  $116,035 
 Cost of sales  61,680   93,359 
 Gross Profit  46,133   22,676 
         
 Operating Expenses:        
 Selling expenses  77,139   31,004 
 General and administrative  1,333,371   247,837 
 Professional fees  696,222   410,698 
 Total Operating Expenses  2,106,732   689,539 
 Loss from Operations  (2,060,599)  (666,863)
         
Other Income (Expenses):        
Other income  13,333   12,458 
Interest expense  (32,417)  (142,810)
Total Other Expenses, Net  (19,084)  (130,352)
Loss Before Income Taxes  (2,079,683)  (797,215)
Provision for income taxes      
Net Loss $(2,079,683) $(797,215)
         
Net Loss Per Share - Basic and Diluted $(0.25) $(0.19)
         
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding During the Period -- Basic and Diluted  8,175,639   4,200,000 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


EnerJex Resources, Inc. and SubsidiariesF-4

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018

  Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series A Shares Preferred Stock Series A Amount Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series B Shares Preferred Stock Series B Amount Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series C Shares Preferred Stock Series C Amount Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series D Shares Preferred Stock Series D Amount Par $ .0001 Common Shares Common Stock Amount Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
Balance as of December 31, 2016 37,530  $  71  $     $     $  336,957  $420  $1,902,161  $(2,799,193) $(896,612)
Pre-merger issuances of shares  42,470      (56)     12            94,756             
Pre-merger conversion of shares                          220,083             
Issuance of employee and director stock options                                6,397      6,397 
Warrants issued with convertible promissory note                                9,082      9,082 
Share compensation period costs                                22,192      22,192 
Net loss                                   (797,215)  (797,215)
Balance as of December 31, 2017  80,000      14      12            651,796   420   1,939,832   (3,596,408)  (1,656,156)
Pre-merger issuances and conversions of shares  (80,000)     (6)     (12)           3,548,204             
Sale of Series C preferred stock              250                  250,000      250,000 
Founder stock returned to company                          (75,000)  (75)  75       
Shares repurchased from shareholder                          (139,567)  (140)  (210,503)     (210,643)
Conversion of Series B and C preferred stock        (8)     (2,467)  (2)        1,616,470   1,616   (1,614)      
Exercise of options                          55,801   56   (56)      
Issuance of Common Stock for consulting services                          185,000   185   400,415      400,600 
AgEagle debt conversion into Common Stock                          787,891   788   1,503,015      1,503,803 
AgEagle shareholder Common Stock conversion to EnerJex common shares              2,056   2         2,757,063   6,537   (6,539)      
Acquisition of Agribotix                          1,275,000   1,275   2,998,725      3,000,000 
Issuance of common and preferred stock for EnerJex shareholders upon merger              197            1,886,736   1,887   (762,662)     (760,775)
Issuance of Series C Common Stock in connection with merger, net of $20K in fees              4,626   5               3,979,995      3,980,000 
Issuance of Series D preferred stock and warrants for cash                    2,000   2         1,969,998      1,970,000 
Share compensation period costs                                110,593      110,593 
Net loss                                   (2,079,683)  (2,079,683)
Balance as of December 31, 2018    $     $  4,662  $5  2,000  $2  12,549,394  $12,549  $12,171,274  $(5,676,091) $6,507,739 

Note: Amounts have been adjusted to reflect 25 to 1 stock split upon merger

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

                                             
   10% Series A   Series B Series C     Series C        Total 
   Preferred Stock  Preferred Stock Preferred
Stock
  Common Stock  Preferred
Stock
  Paid In  Retained  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount Shares Amount  Shares  Amount  Issuable  Capital  Deficit  (Deficit) 
Balance, January 1, 2016  938,248  938   1,764  2  —   —    8,423,936   $8,424   $—    $68,848,944  (71,391,881)  $(2,533,573)
Stock based compensation  —    —    —    —    —   —    —    —    —    241,669   —    241,669 
Preferred stock dividends  —    —    —    —   —    —    —    —    —    —    (3,010,211)  (3,010,211)
Net loss for the year  —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    (13,175,770)  (13,175,770)
Balance, December 31, 2016  938,248   938   1,764   2  —   —    8,423,936   8,424   —    69,090,613   (87,577,862)  (18,477,885)
Stock based compensation                                    13,690       13,690 
Preferred stock dividends                                        (3,518,430)  (3,518,430)
Common stock issued for anti-dilution provision                        597,461   597       299,403  (300,000   
Warrants exercised                        1,771,428   1,772       529,658       531,430 
Sale of series A preferred stock  1,061,750   1,062                             648,729       649,791 
Sale of series C preferred stock                 300   1               299,999       300,000 
Series C preferred stock issuable                                200,000           200,000 
Conversion of series B preferred stock          (1,412)  (1)        5,502,066   5,502       (5,501)       
Beneficial conversion feature                                    208,500   (208,500)   
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution provision                                    3,100,000   (3,100,000)   
Net income for the year                                        8,275,032   8,275,032 
Balance, December 31, 2017  1,999,998  $2,000   352  $1  300  $1   16,294,891  $16,295  $200,000  $74,185,091  $(86,429,760) $(12,026,372)

.

 

F-5

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

  For the Year Ended December 31,
  2018 2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(2,079,683) $(797,215)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  65,362   18,453 
Issuance of employee and director stock options     6,397 
Stock-based compensation  110,593   22,192 
Shares issued for professional services  400,600    
Warrants issued with convertible promissory note     9,082 
Accretion for debt discounts, warrants and issuance costs     25,000 
         
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  163   18,631 
Inventories  12,836   (1,228)
Prepaid expenses and other assets  (76,986)  (10,228)
Deferred Revenue  (1,927)   
Accounts payable  (228,327)  349,729 
Accrued liabilities  (17,513)  (67,709)
Accrued interest  28,744   106,315 
Accrued payroll liabilities  8,000   (8,297)
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,778,138)  (328,878)
         
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Purchases of fixed assets     (12,775)
Cash received in reverse merger  256,255    
Payments of liabilities assumed in reverse merger  (891,474)    
Acquisition of Agribotix  (925,000)  (75,000)
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,560,219)  (87,775)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from the issuance of convertible   notes payable     335,005 
Proceeds from the issuance of promissory note – related party     101,050 
Payments of the principle on note payable  (84,559)   
Shares repurchased from shareholder  (210,643)   
Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock and Series C convertible preferred stock in connection with merger, net of $20,000 in fees  3,980,000    
Proceeds from the sale of Series C convertible preferred stock  250,000    
Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock   Series D  1,970,000    
Net cash provided by financing activities  5,904,798   436,055 
         
Net increase in cash  2,566,441   19,402 
Cash at beginning of period  35,289   15,887 
Cash at end of period $2,601,730  $35,289 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Interest cash paid $39,313  $ 
Income taxes paid $  $ 
         
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Assets acquired (liabilities assumed) in reverse merger:        
Cash $256,255  $ 
Accounts payable  (891,474)   
Promissory note  (125,556)   
Net liabilities assumed $(760,775) $ 
Conversion of debt into Common Stock $1,503,801  $ 
Conversion of Series B and C preferred stock into Common Stock $613  $ 
Acquisition of Agribotix:        
Issuance of Common Stock as consideration $3,000,000  $ 
Cash paid in the prior year  75,000    
Deferred revenue  6,819    
Inventory  (3,685)   
Fixed assets  (7,650)   
Intangible assets  (724,500)   
Goodwill  (3,270,984)   
Cash paid for acquisition $(925,000) $ 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 F-5F-6

 

EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended DecemberNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017 and 2016

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Cash flows from operating activities        
Net income (loss) $8,275,032  $(13,175,770)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  234,135   413,967 
Write-off of inventory  71,982    
Amortization of deferred financing costs  223,790     
Impairment of oil and gas assets     8,032,670 
Stock, options and warrants issued for services  13,690   241,669 
Accretion of asset retirement obligation  112,062   225,480 
Settlement of asset retirement obligations     (2,767)
(Gain) loss on derivatives     2,520,831 
Gain on loan sale agreement, net of cash  (11,500,124)   
Changes in current assets and liabilities        
Accounts receivable  105,772   377,233 
Inventory  (15,943)  (41,406)
Deposits and prepaid expenses  252,478   (246,059)
Accounts payable  (94,783)  (848,601)
Accrued liabilities  1,080,420   404,108 
Cash flows used in operating activities  (1,241,489)  (2,098,645)
         
Cash flows from investing activities        
Purchase of fixed assets     (241,683)
Oil and gas properties additions  (4,632)  (17,089)
Increase in restricted cash     (50,000)
Cash flows (used in) investing activities  (4,632)  (308,772)
         
Cash flows from financing activities        
Proceeds from sale of stock and warrant exercise  1,681,221    
Proceeds from borrowings  225,000    
Repayments of long-term debt  (67,653)  (686,660)
Bank account transfer on loan sale agreement  (92,546)   
Cash released from restricted cash  50,000    
Deferred financing costs     120,430 
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities  1,796,022  (566,230)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  549,901  (2,973,647)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning  128,035   3,101,682 
Cash and cash equivalents, end $677,936  $128,035 
         
Supplemental disclosures:        
Interest paid $  $922,072 
Income taxes paid $  $ 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Beneficial conversion feature on Series C preferred stock accounted as preferred dividend $208,500    
Common stock issued for anti-dilution provision $597    
Conversion of Series B preferred stock into common stock $5,502    
Share-based payments issued for services $13,690  $241,669 
Payroll liability converted to note payable $113,750    
Non-cash note payable issued in conjunction with the LSA $105,806    
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution provision $3,400,000    
Preferred dividends payable $3,518,430  $3,010,211 
Loan settled and exchanged with assets including oil and gas properties and liabilities  $13,425,000    

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


EnerJex Resources, Inc.

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Note 1 - Summary– Description of Accounting PoliciesBusiness

AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (“AgEagle” or “the Company”) was created to pioneer, innovate and advance aerial imaging data collection and analytics technologies capable of addressing the impending food and environmental sustainability crises that threaten the planet. The Company’s daily efforts are focused on delivering the metrics, tools and strategies necessary to define and implement intelligent sustainability and precision farming solutions that solve important problems confronting the agricultural industry. Since its founding in 2010, the Company has remained intent on becoming a trusted partner to major food manufacturers and precision growers seeking to adopt and support productive agricultural approaches to better farming practices which limit impact on natural resources, reduce reliance on inputs and materially increase crop yields and profits.

 The Company designs, produces, distributes and supports technologically-advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones) that AgEagle offers for sale commercially to the precision agriculture industry. In addition to UAV sales, in late 2018, the Company introduced a new drone-leasing program, alleviating farmers and agribusinesses from significant upfront costs associated with purchasing a drone, while also relieving them from ongoing drone maintenance and support requirements. Additionally, the new program provides the option of engaging a trained AgEagle pilot to operate the drone and manage the entire image collection process, creating a truly turnkey aerial imagery capture solution for its customers.

Additionally, the Company recently announced a new service offering using its leased UAVs and associated data processing services for the sustainable agriculture industry.AgEagle is the nation’s first drone-based aerial imagery company to utilize leading-edge data capture technology and customized analytics solutions to help promote and proactively support corporate and farming sustainability initiatives.

 

On August 28, 2018, AgEagle acquired all right, title and interest in and to all assets owned by Agribotix, LLC to be utilized in their business of providing integrated agricultural drone solutions and drone-enabled software technologies and services for precision agriculture. AgEagle’s management believes that purchasing Agribotix’s primary product,FarmLens™, will benefit the Company and its shareholders by developing important vertically integrated products and services.FarmLens is a subscription cloud analytics service that processes data, primarily collected with a drone such as ours, and makes such data actionable by farmers and agronomists.FarmLens is currently sold by the Company as a subscription service and offered either standalone or in a bundle with drone platforms manufactured by leading drone providers like AgEagle, DJI and senseFly.

The Company is headquartered in Neodesha, Kansas. Its website address is http://www.ageagle.com.

Corporate History; Recent Business Combinations

On March 26, 2018 (the “Merger Date”), the Company consummated the transactions contemplated by that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated October 19, 2017, pursuant to which AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, merged with and into AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., a privately held company organized under the laws of the state of Nevada (“AgEagle Sub”), with AgEagle Sub surviving as its wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger, the Company changed its name to AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and AgEagle Sub changed its name to “AgEagle Aerial, Inc.” The Company’s Common Stock continues to trade on the NYSE American under its new symbol “UAVS” since March 27, 2018.

Prior to the merger, the Company was formerly known as Millennium Plastics Corporation and was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 31, 1999. In August 2006, the Company acquired Midwest Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation pursuant to a reverse merger. After such merger, Midwest Energy became a wholly-owned subsidiary, and as a result of such merger, the former Midwest Energy stockholders controlled approximately 98% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock. The Company changed its name to EnerJex Resources, Inc., (“EnerJex”) in connection with this merger, and in November 2007, it changed the name of Midwest Energy (one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries) to EnerJex Kansas, Inc. (“EnerJex Kansas”). All of its operations conducted prior to this merger were through EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Black Sable”) and Black Raven Energy, Inc. a Nevada corporation (“Black Raven”). The Company’s leasehold interests were held in our wholly-owned subsidiaries Black Sable, Working Interest, LLC, EnerJex Kansas and Black Raven.

F-7

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 1 – Description of Business-Continued

On August 28, 2018, the Company closed the transactions contemplated by the previously announced Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) dated July 25, 2018 with AgEagle Aerial, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Agribotix, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (sometimes also referred to herein as” Agribotix” or the “Seller”), and the other parties named therein. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired all right, title and interest in and to all assets owned by the Seller utilized in the Seller’s business of providing integrated agricultural drone solutions and drone-enabled software technologies and services for precision agriculture, except for certain excluded assets as set forth in the Purchase Agreement. At closing, the Company also assumed certain liabilities under various third-party contracts pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Our and Consolidation - These financial consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our operationsThe Company’s consolidated financial statements are considered to fall withinprepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a single industry segment, which are the acquisition, development, exploitation and production of crude oil and natural gas properties in the United States.  OurDecember 31 fiscal year end.

The consolidated financial statements include ourthe accounts of AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

subsidiaries AgEagle Aerial, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Black Raven Energy, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated uponin consolidation.  Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. 

Nature of Business

We are an independent energy company engaged in the business of producing and selling crude oil and natural gas. The crude oil and natural gas is obtained primarily by the acquisition and subsequent exploration and development of mineral leases.  Development and exploration may include drilling new exploratory or development wells on these leases. These operations are conducted primarily in Kansas.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

 

The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Such consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company’s management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuesrevenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates included in the consolidated financial statements are: (1) oil and gas revenues and reserves; (2) depreciation, depletion and amortization; (3) valuation allowances associated with income taxes (4) accrued assets and liabilities; (5) stock-based compensation; (6) asset retirement obligations, (7) valuation of derivative instruments and (8) impairment of oil and gas assets.  Although management believes these estimates are reasonable, changes in facts and circumstances or discovery of new information may result in revised estimates.  Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the allowance for bad debt, warranty and dealer termination costs, obsolete inventory, valuation of stock issued for services and stock options, valuation of intangible assets and the valuation of deferred tax assets.

 

Trade Accounts ReceivableFair Value of Financial Instruments - Unless otherwise disclosed, the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, convertible debt, promissory notes, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximates their recorded values due to their short-term maturities.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents includes any highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

Receivables and Credit Policy -Trade accounts receivablereceivables due from customers are recordeduncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. Terms with our distributor allow for payment terms of 45 days from the invoice date. Trade receivables are stated at the invoiced amount and dobilled to the customer. The Company generally does not bear any interest.  We regularly reviewcharge interest on overdue customer account balances. Payments of trade receivables are allocated to insure that the amounts will be collected and establishspecific invoices identified on the customer’s remittance advice or, adjustif unspecified, are applied to the earliest unpaid invoices.

The Company estimates an allowance for uncollectible amountsdoubtful accounts based upon an evaluation of the current status of receivables, historical experience, and other factors as necessary usingnecessary. It is reasonably possible that the specific identification method.  Account balances are charged off againstCompany’s estimate of the allowance after all meansfor doubtful accounts will change. The Company determined that no allowance was necessary as of collection have been exhaustedDecember 31, 2018 and the potential for recovery is considered remote.December 31, 2017.

 

Inventory

F-8

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

  

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Continued

Inventories - Inventories, which consist of raw materials, finished goods and work-in-process, are comprised of crude oil held in storage and materials and supplies used in field operations. Crude oil inventories are valuedstated at the lower of cost or market,net realizable value, with cost being determined by the average-cost method, which approximates the first-in, first-out method. Cost components include direct materials and direct labor, as well as in-bound freight. At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates its ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. This evaluation primarily includes an analysis of forecasted demand in relation to the inventory on hand, among consideration of other factors. The physical condition (e.g., age and quality) of the inventories is also considered in establishing its valuation. Based upon the evaluation, provisions are made to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable values. Once established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the respective inventories. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the amounts that the Company may ultimately realize upon the disposition of inventories if future economic conditions, customer inventory levels, product discontinuances, sales return levels or competitive conditions differ from the Company’s estimates and expectations. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had recorded a first-in, first outprovision for obsolescence of $10,369 and $15,369, respectively.

Goodwill - We review the recoverability of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable or o on an annual basis. Material and suppliesThe estimated future cash flows are valued at lower of cost or market, based upon, specificamong other things assumptions about expected future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made. As of December 31, 2018, there have been no events or changes in circumstances that indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment has occurred since assessment date of August 2018.

Intangible Assets – Acquired in Business Combinations-We perform valuations of assets acquired and liabilities assumed on each acquisition accounted for as a business combination and allocate the purchase price of each acquired business to our respective net tangible and intangible assets. Acquired intangible assets include: customer relationships and trade names. We use valuation techniques to value these intangibles assets, with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various assumptions and estimates including projected revenue, gross margins, operating costs, growth rates, useful lives and discount rates Intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method which approximates the pattern in which the economic benefits are consumed.

Business Combinations - The Company recognizes, with certain exceptions, 100% of the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests when the acquisition constitutes a change in control of the acquired entity. Shares issued in consideration for a business combination, contingent consideration arrangements and pre-acquisition loss and gain contingencies are all measured and recorded at their acquisition-date fair value. Subsequent changes to fair value of contingent consideration arrangements are generally reflected in earnings. Any in-process research and development assets acquired are capitalized as of the acquisition date. Acquisition-related transaction costs are expensed as incurred. The operating results of entities acquired are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition.

Revenue Recognition and Concentration-The Company generally recognizes revenue on sales to customers, dealer and distributors upon satisfaction of our performance obligations when the goods are shipped. The Company generally ships FOB Shipping Point terms. Shipping documents are used to verify delivery and customer acceptance. The Company assesses whether the sales price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and quantity of drones being purchased. The Company assesses collectability based on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by evaluations and the customer’s payment history. Additionally, customers are required to place a deposit on each UAV ordered.

F-9

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Continued

As a result of the Agribotix acquisition, the Company now has an additional product line which is the sale of subscription services for use of theFarmLens™ platform to process aerial imaging. These subscription fees are recognized ratably over each monthly membership period.

The Company has executed one significant non-exclusive worldwide distributor agreement in 2016 and amended this agreement to make it non-exclusive by allowing the Company the right to sell its products directly into the marketplace. Only the non-exclusive worldwide distributor has the right of return within twelve months of purchase up to a certain percentage of the annual sales volume less a restocking fee. As of December 31, 2018, no sales of the Company are subject to this right of return clause per the distributor agreement.

Sales concentration information for customers comprising more than 10% of the Company’s total net sales such customers is summarized below:

  Percent of total sales for year ended December 31,
Customers 2018 2017
Customer A  18.0%   * 
Customer B  10.4%   * 
Customer C   *   20.9%

The table below reflects our revenue for the periods indicated by product mix.

  For the Year Ended December 31,
Type 2018 2017
Product Sales $93,219  $116,035 
Subscription Sales  14,594    
Total $107,813  $116,035 

Vendor Concentration-As of December 31, 2018, there was one significant vendors that the Company relies upon to perform stitching itsFarmLensplatform. This vendor provided services to the Company which can be replaced by alternative vendors should the need arise.

Shipping Costs - Shipping costs for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $ 5,239, and $5,648 for the year ended December 31, 2017. All shipping costs billed directly to the customer are directly offset to shipping costs resulting in a net expense to the Company which is included in cost or by using a weighted average cost.of goods sold in shipments of operations.

Advertising Costs – Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs amounted to $1,454 for the year ended December 31, 2018, and $11,775 for the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

Share-Based PaymentsEarnings Per Share - Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus Common Stock equivalents (if dilutive) related to warrants, options and convertible instruments.

 

F-10

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Continued

Potentially Dilutive Securities - The Company has excluded all common equivalent shares outstanding for warrants, options and convertible instruments to purchase Common Stock from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because all such securities are antidilutive for the periods presented. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company had 3,703,703 warrants and 1,287,103 options to purchase Common Stock, 4,662 shares of Series C Preferred Stock which may be converted into 8,633,333 shares of Common Stock. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had 828,200 warrants and 1,134,800 options to purchase Common Stock, and 1,095,864 potential convertible shares which may be issued resulting from the provisions of convertible notes.

Income Taxes - The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. This topic requires an asset and liability approach for accounting for income taxes. The Company evaluates its tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken on income tax returns to determine if an accrual is necessary for uncertain tax positions. The Company will recognize future accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense if incurred. All income tax returns not filed more than three years ago are subject to federal and state tax examinations by tax authorities.

Share-Based Compensation Awards - The value we assign to the options and warrants that we issue is based on the fair market value as calculated by the Black-Scholes pricing model. To perform a calculation of the value of our options, and warrants, we determine an estimate of the volatility of our stock. We need to estimate volatility because there has not been enough trading of our stock to determine an appropriate measure of volatility. We believe our estimate of volatility is reasonable, and we review the assumptions used to determine this whenever we issue a new equity instruments. If we have a material error in our estimate of the volatility of our stock, our expenses could be understated or overstated. All share-based awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options.

 

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized when items of income and expense are recognized in the financial statements in different periods than when recognized in the applicable tax return. Deferred tax assets arise when expenses are recognized in the financial statements before the tax returns or when income items are recognized in the tax return prior to the financial statements. Deferred tax assets also arise when operating losses or tax credits are available to offset tax payments due in future years. Deferred tax liabilities arise when income items are recognized in the financial statements before the tax returns or when expenses are recognized in the tax return prior to the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the date when the change in the tax rate was enacted.


We routinely assess the reliability of our deferred tax assets.  If we conclude that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized under accounting standards, the tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance.  In addition we routinely assess uncertain tax positions, and accrue for tax positions that are not more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.

Uncertain Tax Positions

We follow guidance in Topic 740 of the Codification for its accounting for uncertain tax positions. Topic 740 prescribes guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. To recognize a tax position, we determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation, based solely on the technical merits of the position. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of tax benefit recognized with respect to any tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement.

We have no liability for unrecognized tax benefits recorded as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Accordingly, there is no amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate and there is no amount of interest or penalties currently recognized in the consolidated statement of operations or consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. In addition, we do not believe that there are any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. We recognize related interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.

Tax years open for audit by federal tax authorities as of December 31, 2017 are the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016. Tax years ending prior to 2014 are open for audit to the extent that net operating losses generated in those years are being carried forward or utilized in an open year.

Fair Value Measurements

Accounting guidance establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value based upon the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and creates a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.  Additional disclosures are required, including disclosures of fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy.  We incorporate a credit risk assumption into the measurement of certain assets and liabilities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investment instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents for purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows and other statements. We maintain cash on deposit, which, can exceeds federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses on such accounts and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and equivalents.

Revenue Recognition

Oil and gas revenues are recognized net of royalties when production is sold to a purchaser at a fixed or determinable price, when delivery has occurred and title has transferred, and if collection of the revenue is probable. Cash received relating to future revenues is deferred and recognized when all revenue recognition criteria are met.

Fixed Assets

Property and equipment are recorded at cost.

At December 31, 2017, Fixed Assets consisted of furniture and equipment of $773,707 and building and leasehold improvements of $23,069, as well as accumulated depreciation of furniture and fixtures of $597,692 and accumulated depreciation of building and leasehold improvements of $20,969.

At December 31, 2016, Fixed Assets consisted of vehicles $355,886, furniture and equipment of $795,563, building and leasehold improvements of $23,069 and gathering and compression systems of $2,720,247, as well as accumulated depreciation of vehicles of $336,083, accumulated depreciation of furniture and fixtures of $532,190, accumulated depreciation of building and leasehold improvements of $17,515 and accumulated depreciation of gathering and compression systems of $931,923. 


Depreciation is determined by the use of the straight-line method of accounting using the estimated lives of the assets (3-15 years).  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense.

Debt issue costs

Debt issuance costs incurred are capitalized and subsequently amortized over the term of the related debt utilizing the straight-line method of amortization over the estimated life of the debt.

Oil & Gas Properties and Long-Lived Assets

We follow the full cost method of accounting under which all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized. We also capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with our acquisition, exploration and development activities and do not include costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities.

Proved properties are amortized using the units of production method (UOP). Currently we only have operations in the United States of America. The UOP calculation multiplies the percentage of estimated proved reserves produced each quarter by the cost of these reserves. The amortization base in the UOP calculation includes the sum of proved property, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A), estimated future development costs (future costs to access and develop proved reserves) and asset retirement costs, less related salvage value. 

The cost of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization calculation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to such properties or until development projects are placed into service. Geological and geophysical costs not associated with specific properties are recorded as proved property immediately. Unproved properties are reviewed for impairment quarterly.

Impairment of long-lived assets is recorded when indications of impairment are present. Impairment is indicated when the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying value.  The carrying value of the assets is then reduced to their estimated fair value that is measured based on an estimate of future discounted cash flows.

Under the full-cost-method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is (a) the present value of future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil & gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil & gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of 10 percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditionsplus (b) the cost of properties not being amortizedplus (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortizedless (d) income tax effects related to differences between book and tax basis of properties. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an un-weighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.

Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional DD&A in the statement of operations. The ceiling calculation is performed quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2016 impairment charges of $8,032,670 were recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.

Proceeds from the sale or disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction to capitalized costs unless a significant portion (greater than 25%) of our reserve quantities are sold, in which case a gain or loss is recognized in income. In 2015, the Company sold its Cherokee project assets located in Eastern Kansas for net proceeds of $2,867,305. At the time of the sale the reserve quantities made up approximately 6.7% of total reserve quantities. Accordingly, the net proceeds reduced the carrying value of our oil and gas properties.

On February 10, 2017, the Company and the other Sellers entered into and completed the transactions contemplated by the LSA, described in greater detail in “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The asset retirement obligation relates to the plug and abandonment costs when our wells are no longer useful. We determine the value of the liability by obtaining quotes for this service and estimate the increase we will face in the future. We then discount the future value based on an intrinsic interest rate that is appropriate for us. If costs rise more than what we have expected there could be additional charges in the future, however, we monitor the costs of the abandoned wells and we will adjust this liability if necessary.


Major Purchasers

For the years ended December 31, 2017, and 2016 we sold our produced crude oil to ARM Energy Management, LLC, Coffeyville Resources Inc., and Sunoco Logistics Inc. on a month-to-month basis and we sold our produced natural gas to United Energy Trading and Western Operating Company.

Marketable Securities Available for Sale

The Company classifies its marketable equity securities as available-for-sale and they are carried at fair market value at December 31, 2016, the carrying value of this security was $210,990. During 2017 the security was transferred as part of the LSA transaction (described below).

Net Income Per Common Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the impact of common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants and conversion of convertible debt and preferred stock that are not deemed to be anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of the outstanding stock options and warrants is computed using the treasury stock method.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, diluted net loss per share did not include the effect of 298,664 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods to conform to current presentations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted by the Company

In July 2017, the FinancialRecently Issued Accounting Standards Board (FASB)In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share(“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part 1) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement606). This updated guidance supersedes the current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The updated guidance introduces a five-step model to achieve its core principal of the Indefinite Deferralentity recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instrumentsthose goods or services. This standard provides a single set of Certain Non-public Entitiesguidelines for revenue recognition to be used across all industries and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU 2017-11”). Part I relates to the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features in Subtopic 815-40, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced based on the pricing of future equity offerings. An entity still is required to determine whether instruments would be classified as equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities. ASU 2017-11requires additional disclosures. It is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-11 during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company had nocumulative effect of the change in accounting principle on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the beginning of 2017.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements ApplicableTopic 606 requires revenue to the Company

In May 2014, the FASB issued (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenuesbe recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amountamounts that reflectsreflect the consideration to which an entitythe Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five- step process to achieve this core principleservices and in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required withinrecognize revenue under the new standard as costs are incurred. Under previous U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), revenue was generally recognized when deliveries were made, performance milestones were attained, or as costs were incurred. The new standard accelerates the timing of when the revenue is recognized, however, it does not change the total amount of revenue recognized on these contracts. The new standard does not affect revenue recognition process thanfor purposes of the Company’s sales as each of the Company’s revenue transactions represent a single performance obligation that is satisfied at a point time or monthly subscription fees which are required under existing GAAP. The guidancerecognized ratably over the subscription period, as defined in the new ASU. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue for small UAVS product contracts with customers at the point in time when the transfer of control passes to the customer, which is effective for annualgenerally when title and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The standard is required to be adopted using either the full retrospective approach, with all prior periods presented adjusted, or the modified retrospective approach, with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings on the opening balance sheet.risk of loss transfer. The Company plans to adopt thisadopted the updated guidance effective January 1, 2018 using the modifiedfull retrospective method, applied to contracts that arehowever the new standard did not completedhave a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations, as it did not change the manner or timing of that date.recognizing revenue on a majority of its revenue transactions.

F-11

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Continued

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial statements. This guidance will be effective in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and early adoption is not permitted. The Company hasis currently evaluating which transition method it will adopt and the expected impact of the updated guidance, but does not identified changes to its revenue recognition policies that would result in a material adjustment tobelieve the opening balanceadoption of retained earnings on January 1, 2018. Adopting thisthe updated guidance will result in increased disclosures related to revenue recognition policies and disaggregation of revenue in future disclosures in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. As allowed by the practical expedients under Topic 606, the Company does not plan to provide expanded disclosures with respect to the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with variable consideration or with an original term of one year or less.have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASUAccount Standards Update 2016-02 a new lease standard requiring– Leases (Topic 842) intended to improve financial reporting of leasing transaction whereby lessees will need to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease assets and lease liabilitiesliability for most leases classified as operating leases under previous U.S. GAAP. Thevirtually all of their leases. Under the new guidance, is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Companya lessee will be required to use a modified retrospective approachrecognize assets and liabilities for leases that existwith lease terms of more than twelve months. Consistent with current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or are entered into afteroperating lease. However, unlike current GAAP—which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the beginningbalance sheet—the new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the earliest comparative period in the financial statements.balance sheet. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.the updated guidance.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 seeksThe new guidance is intended to reduce the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash paymentstransactions are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This updateASU is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early2017. The adoption permitted. The Company plans to adoptof this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company hasstandard did not identified any changes that upon adoption will have a material effectimpact on its cash flows.the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations—Clarifying the definition of a business (Topic 805). This ASU clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of providing a more robust framework to evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2017-01 effective May 1, 2018 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation-StockCompensation—Stock Compensation (Topic(Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”, which provides. This ASU reduces the diversity in practice and cost and complexity when applying the guidance about which changesin Topic 718 to thea change in terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718.award. The Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2017-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements haveMay 1, 2018 did not yet been issued. The Company plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company has not identified any changes that upon adoption will have a material effectimpact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by FASB did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

F-12

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 3 — Inventories

Inventories consist of the following at:

  December 31,
  2018 2017
Raw materials $109,826  $106,569 
Work-in process  30,088   34,850 
Finished goods  19,937   32,582 
Gross inventory  159,851   174,001 
Less obsolete reserve  (10,369)  (15,369)
Total $149,482  $158,632 

Note 4 — Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the following at:

  December 31,
  2018 2017
Property and equipment $116,313  $108,664 
Less accumulated depreciation  (87,939)  (69,961)
  $28,374  $38,703 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $17,980 and $18,453 respectively.

Note 5 — Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are recorded at cost and consist of the assets acquired for the acquisition of Agribotix. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated life of the asset. The FASB issued ASU 2017-05, “Other Income - GainsCompany will annually assess intangible and Losses fromother long-lived assets for impairment. Intangible assets were comprised of the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic: 610-20): Clarifyingfollowing at December 31, 2018:

  Estimated
Life
 Gross Cost Accumulated Amortization Net Book Value
Carrying value as of December 31, 2017   $  $  $ 
Intellectual Property/Technology  5 Years  433,400   (28,893)  404,507 
Customer Base  20 Years  72,000   (1,200)  70,800 
Tradenames and Trademarks  5 Years  58,200   (3,880)  54,320 
Non-compete Agreement  4 Years  160,900   (13,409)  147,491 
Carrying value as of December 31, 2018   $724,500  $(47,382) $677,118 

Amortization expense for the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidanceyears ended December 31, 2018 and the Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets,” which helps filers determine the guidance applicable for gain/loss recognition subsequent2017 was $47,382 and $0, respectively.

F-13

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 6 —Investment in Unconsolidated Investee

In November 2017, AgEagle Sub entered into a multi-agreement arrangement with Agribotix, headquartered in Boulder, Colorado, an agricultural information processing company providing actionable data to the adoptionagriculture industry. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement whereby AgEagle Sub exchanged 200,000 shares of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments also clarify that the derecognitionCompany’s Common Stock it received in the Merger (equal to an aggregate value of all businesses except those related$1,000,000) for 20% of the equity membership interests of Agribotix.

Prior to conveyances of oil and gas rights or contracts with customers should beAugust 28, 2018, the Company accounted for its initial investment in accordanceAgribotix using the equity method of accounting. The ownership interest was accounted for as if Agribotix was a consolidated subsidiary and all identifiable assets, including goodwill and identifiable intangibles, were recorded at fair value and amortized, with this amortization recorded in “memo” and included in the derecognition and deconsolidation guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.Company’s portion of earnings of Agribotix. The Company adoptedacquired all the ASUassets of Agribotix on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method. Under this transition method the Company may elect to apply this guidance retrospectively either to all contracts atAugust 28, 2018. As of the date of initial application or only to contracts that are not completed contracts at the date of initial application. The Company elected to evaluate only contracts that are not completed contracts. As there were no not completed contracts at January 1, 2018, there was no impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures upon adoption.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. The FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires companies to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations of all leases with a term greater than 12 months (long-term) on the balance sheet. Leases to explore for or use minerals, oil and natural gas are not impacted by this guidance. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, “Leases (Topic 842), Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842.” This ASU permits an entity to continue to apply its current accounting policy for land easements that existed before the effective date of Topic 842. Once an entity adopts Topic 842, it would apply that Topic prospectively to all new (or modified) land easements to determine whether the arrangement contains a lease. Topic 842 requires adoption by application of a modified retrospective transition approach and is effective foracquisition, the Company on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.

The Company is inadjusted the process of reviewing its portfolio of leased assets and related contracts to determinedifference between the impact that adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company is also assessing the impact of Topic 842 on its systems, processes and internal controls. The Company plans to elect certain practical expedients when implementing the new lease standard, which means the Company will not have to reassess the existence or classification of leases for contracts, including land easements that commenced prior to adoption. The Company anticipates upon adoption to recognize assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations of its existing long-term operating leases on its consolidated balance sheets and to utilize new systems, processes and internal controls to properly identify, classify, measure and recognize new (or modified) leases after the date of adoption. The Company will complete its evaluation during 2018 and will adopt Topic 842 on January 1, 2019, using a modified retrospective approach for all comparative periods presented.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. This new standard clarifies the definition of a business and provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the faircarrying value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of)Company’s investment to fair value, which is concentratedreflected in a single identifiable asset or a groupthe purchase consideration recorded upon the acquisition of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This new standard will be effectiveAgribotix. See Note 7. unaudited summary financial information for Agribotix for the Company on January 1, 2018; however, early adoptionfive months ended August 28, 2018 is permitted with prospective application to any business development transaction.as follows:

 


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  
Revenues $129,171 
Cost of sales  100,366 
Gross profit  28,805 
Operating expenses  418,333 
Operating loss  (389,528)
Other expense  (3,845)
Net loss  (393,373)
Amortization of “memo” intangible assets  (88,755)
Total adjusted net loss  (482,128)
Adjustment to fair value of ownership interest $(482,128)
Ownership interest  20%
Share of adjusted net income   

Note 2 - Going Concern7 – Acquisition

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming thatOn August 28, 2018, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplatesacquired, all right, title and interest in and to all assets owned by the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilitiesSeller utilized in the normal courseSeller’s business of business. The Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2017 of $86,429,760. Also, cash used in operations was $1,241,489providing integrated agricultural drone solutions and drone-enabled software technologies and services for the year ended December 31, 2017.  The ability of the Company to continueprecision agriculture, except for certain excluded assets as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described below. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Merger Agreement

On October 19, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”), which designs, develops, produces, and distributes technologically advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV or drones) that are supplied to the agriculture industry, and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the MergerPurchase Agreement Merger Sub will be merged with and into AgEagle, Merger Sub will cease(the “Purchased Assets”). At closing, the Company assumed certain liabilities under various third-party contracts pursuant to exist and AgEagle will survive asthe terms of the Purchase Agreement.

The consideration for the Purchased Assets made at closing included the following: (a) a wholly-owned subsidiarycash payment of $150,000 (of which $110,000 was previously paid), (b) 200,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Merger”). The respective boardsat a value of directors$5.00 per share (all of which shares were issued to the Seller pursuant to an exchange agreement between the Company and AgEagle have approved the Merger AgreementSeller dated as of November 20, 2017), (c) an amount payable at closing equal to the sum of: (i) 500,000 shares of Common Stock at a value of $2.00 per share (the “Closing Shares”); and (ii) $450,000 in cash. In addition, the transactions contemplated thereby.Seller paid on the 90th day following the closing equal to the sum of: (i) the number of shares of Common Stock that is calculated by dividing $2,000,000 by the $2.00 share and (ii) $400,000 in cash.

 

At the effective time

F-14

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 7 – Acquisition-Continued

If revenue of the Merger (the “Effective Time”)business for the one-year period ending on the first anniversary of the closing date is at least $1,000,000, plus the Capital Investment Multiplier (as defined below), then the Seller shall earn the number of shares of AgEagleCommon Stock that is calculated by dividing $250,000 by the Average Price (calculated as if the 20–trading day period to which reference is made above ends on such first anniversary), provided that in no event shall the Average Price be less than $2.00. “Capital Investment Multiplier” means 1.5 times the amount of capital stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive equal to 85% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis. In addition, at the Effective Time all outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle common stock will be assumedinvested by the Company and converted into options and warrants to purchase shares of Company common stock. No fractional shares of Company common stock will be issuedor its affiliates in the Merger but will be roundedSeller to support and advance the nearest whole share. Following the consummationbusiness, inclusive of the Merger, former stockholders of AgEagle with respectloans or other investments provided to the Merger are expected to own 85% of the Company’s outstanding common stock (inclusive of the AgEagle assumed stock options and warrants), and current common and Series A Preferred stockholders of the Company are expected to own 15% of the Company, excluding shares of common stock that may be issued in connection with the conversion of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, and not including any additional shares which may be issued in connection with the Company’s closing obligation to provide up to $4 million in new working capital and the elimination of all liabilities currently on the Company’s balance sheet.

In connection with the Merger, the Company will also file a proxy statement seeking stockholder approval to: (a) amend the terms of its Series A Preferred Stock (as discussed below); (b) approve the issuance of the Company’s shares in connection with the Merger to the AgEagle shareholders and new investors, in excess of 19.9% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (c) approve the issuance of shares to current Company management and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnity obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (d) change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Resources, Inc.” 

The Merger Agreement provides that, immediately following the Effective Time, the existing board of directors and officers of the Company will resign and new directors and officers will be appointed by AgEagle.

The Company intends to dispose of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties, concurrently with the closing of the Merger. In the event the Merger is not consummated, the Company does not have a present intention to dispose of the above described assets.

The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the stockholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the stockholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle stockholders in connection with the Merger and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listing of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional fundingSeller prior to the closing, of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement.less $250,000.

 

F-12

The MergerPurchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants obligating each of the Company and AgEagle to continue to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course, to provide reasonable access to each other’s information and to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate and coordinate to make any filings or submissions that are required to be made under any applicable laws or requested to be made by any government authority in connection with the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contains a customary “no solicitation” provision pursuant to which, prior to the earlier of January 31, 2018, or the completion or termination of the Merger, neither the Company nor AgEagle may solicit or engage in discussions with any third party regarding another acquisition proposal unless, in the Company’s case, it has received an unsolicited, bona fide written proposal that the recipient’s board of directors determines is or would reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal. The Company has paid AgEagle a $50,000 non-refundable fee at the signing of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights in favor of each of the Company and AgEagle.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for indemnification in the event of any damages suffered by either party as a result of, among other things, breaches of representations and warranties contained therein. TheAn aggregate maximum indemnification obligationamount equal $75,000 in cash, 50% of any indemnifying party for damagesthe number of Closing Shares and 25% of the number of Post-Closing Shares were deposited in an escrow account with respecta third-party escrow agent to breaches of representations and warranties set forth insecure the Merger Agreement shall not exceed, in the aggregate, $350,000, other than for fraud, intentional misrepresentation or willful breach. An indemnifying party shall satisfy its indemnification obligations with shares of Company common stock equal to the aggregate amount of losses of the indemnified party, calculated based upon the greater of (i) the value of the Company common stock as of the closing of the Merger; and (ii) the average closing price of the Company common stock on the NYSE American for the five trading days immediately priorSeller pursuant to the date such a claim is made. The Company has agreed to deposit an aggregate of 1,215,278 shares of common stock to be issued to current officers and directors of the Company in lieu of deferred salary and fees into escrow to secure its indemnification obligations, the issuance of such shares requiring the approval of the Company’s common stockholders.

In connection with, and as a condition to the closing of the Merger, the Company is seeking the consent of the holder of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) to amend the terms thereof to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, and (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of Company common stock. An affirmative vote of 66.7% of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock voting as a class as of the record date of the proxy statement is required to amend the terms of the Certificate of Designation to provide for these changes, as required under the MergerPurchase Agreement. As of September 30, 2017, the Series A Preferred Stock had accrued a total of $6,039,972 in accrued but unpaid dividends, which would result in an additional 241,599 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued by

In accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations”, the Company accounted for the acquisition of Agribotix using the acquisition method of accounting. The purchase price was allocated to satisfy these accrued dividends.specific identifiable tangible and intangible assets at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition.

 

The Merger Agreement provides either partyfollowing table summarizes the right to terminate the Merger if it has not been consummated by January 31, 2018, provided that if alltotal fair value of the conditionsconsideration transferred as well as the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

Common Stock consideration $3,000,000 
Cash paid  1,000,000 
 Total purchase consideration  4,000,000 
Inventory  (3,685)
Property and equipment  (7,650)
Intangibles assets  (724,500)
Deferred revenue  6,819 
 Goodwill $3,270,984 

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net assets recognized and represents the expected revenue and benefits of the combined company. Goodwill recognized as a result of the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. See Note 5 for additional information about other intangible assets. The recognized goodwill related to closing shall have been satisfied or shall be capable of being satisfied at such time,Agribotix is directly attributable to synergies expected to arise after the required closing date may be extended until March 31, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company extended the required closing date with AgEagle to March 31, 2018.acquisition.

 

On November 21, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) signed a binding commitment letter with the Company to provide prior to or at the closing of the Merger, a minimum of $4 million in new equity capital at a pre-money valuation of between $16 million and $25 million (the “Private Placement”). Per the terms of this commitment letter, in the event any unaffiliated third parties of EnerJex participate in the Private Placement, Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall be reduced by such aggregate gross dollar amount funded by such unaffiliated third parties. Alpha has also agreed to convert all notes they hold from the Company into equity at the closing of the Merger. For their funding commitment, Alpha will receive a fee equal to 2.5% of the Company’s outstanding common stockAs noted above, control was obtained on a fully diluted basis payable at the closing of the Merger. Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall terminate on the earlier to occur of (i) the consummation of the Merger, and (ii) March 31, 2018. The Company further agreed that, at no time from the date hereof until the consummation of the Merger, shall it provide or disclose to Alpha any “material non-public information” regarding itself, without the prior consent of Alpha. The funding of the Private Placement is subject to standard conditions such as accuracy of representations and warranties provided in the Merger Agreement, and other similar conditions.

Financing Transactions

On February 10, 2017, the Company, TCB and IberiaBank (collectively, “Sellers”), and PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, and certain financial institutions (collectively, “Buyers”) entered into a Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”), pursuant to which Sellers sold to Buyers, and Buyers purchased from Sellers, all of Sellers’ right, title and interest in, to and under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $5,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price”), (ii) a Synthetic Equity Interest equal to 10% of the proceeds, after Buyer’s realization of a 150% return on the Cash Purchase Price within five (5) years ofAugust 28, 2018, the closing date of the sale, with payment being distributed 65.78947368% to TCB and 34.21052632% to IberiaBank, and (iii)transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, at anywhich time prior to February 10, 2022, Buyer may acquire the interest in clause (ii) above. In connection with the LSA, the Company released Sellerstook over the operations of Agribotix and its successorspersonnel.

The accompanying consolidated financial statement includes the activity of Agribotix for the period after the acquisition commencing August 29, 2018 and ending December 31, 2018.

F-15

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 7 – Acquisition-Continued

The following unaudited proforma financial information gives effect to the Company’s acquisition of Agribotix as holdersif the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2018 and had been included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:

  For the years ended December 31,
  2018 2017
Revenue $314,486  $357,727 
Net Income $(2,702,928) $(1,460,046)

Note 8 – Debt

Convertible Notes Payable

On May 6, 2015, the Company closed a private placement pursuant to a subscription agreement whereby two institutional investors (the “2015 Holders”) purchased convertible notes having an aggregate principal amount of $500,000, convertible into Common Stock of the rights underCompany at $2.00 per share and maturing on November 6, 2016. Interest on the Credit Agreementnotes accrued at a rate of 8% annually and Loan Documents, including Buyers, from any and all claims under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents. 


Also on February 10, 2017,was payable quarterly. It was determined that there were no aggregate beneficial conversion features. On or about March 4, 2016, the Company and its subsidiaries, and successor lenderthe 2015 Holders entered into a binding letter agreement dated February 10, 2017, which was subsequently amended on March 30, 2017 (as amended,extension and modification agreements whereby the letter agreement”) pursuant to which:

1.the successor lender2015 Holders agreed to forgive our existing secured loan in the approximate principal amount of $17,295,000, and in exchange entered into a secured promissory note (which we refer to as the “restated secured note”) in the original principal amount of $4,500,000.
2.we:
a.conveyed our oil and gas properties and associated performance and surety bonds in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska;
b.conveyed all of our shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (together, the “conveyed oil and gas assets”); and
c.retained our assets in Kansas and continued as a going concern. The Kansas assets currently provide most of our current operating revenue.

The restated secured note:

a.is secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s oil and gas producing assets situated in the State of Kansas,
b.evidences accrued interest on the $4,500,000 principal balance at a rate of 16% per annum,
c.bears interest from and after May 1, 2017, at a rate of 16.0% per annum,
d.is pre-payable in full at a discount at any time during the term of the restated secured note upon EnerJex paying $3,300,000 to successor lender, and
e.matures and is due and payable in full on November 1, 2017 (subject to the extension right described below).

The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have an option to extend the maturity date of the restated securednotes to November 6, 2016, and permanently waive all rights and remedies, of whatever nature, with respect to the various defaults that occurred under this subscription agreement and notes, including, without limitation, (I) the Company’s failure to become a public SEC reporting company on or before September 30, 2015, (ii) the Company’s failure to pay interest on the notes, and (iii) modifying and waiving certain participation rights in future financings. For the years ended December 31,2018 and2017, the Company recorded$9,111 and$40,000 of interest expense, respectively. As of the Merger Date, the principal amount of the promissory note of $500,000 and its accrued interest of $114,556 were converted at $1.25 per share into 814,381 shares of Common Stock.

On September 6, 2016, the Company closed a private placement pursuant to Aprila subscription agreement whereby an existing institutional investor (the “2016 Holder”) purchased a convertible note having a principal amount of $300,000, convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company at $3.00 per share and maturing on September 30, 2017. Interest on the note accrues at a rate of 8% annually and is payable quarterly. It was determined that there were no aggregate beneficial conversion features. For the years ended December 31,2018 uponand2017,the Company recorded interest expense of$5,467 and$24,000, respectively. As of the Merger Date, the principal amount of the promissory note of $300,000 and its accrued interest of $42,933 were converted at $1.25 per share into 454,440 shares of Common Stock.

On February 3, 2017, the Company closed a private placement pursuant whereby a bridge loan (the “2017 Note A”) agreement was executed with an accredited investor (the “2017 Holder Note A”) to purchase a convertible promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $175,000, an original issue discount of $25,000, convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company at $2.50 per share and maturing 90 days following issuance, or May 4, 2017. After payment of a finder’s fee and other expenses, the Company received net proceeds of $101,250. In addition, the Company also issued to the 2017 Holder Note A warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an extension feeexercise price per share of $50,000.

So long as we repay$2.50. To the $3,300,000extent the entire unpaid principal balance of the note is not paid in indebtednessfull on or prior to the maturity date, (i) interest on the unpaid principal balance will accrue from the maturity date at the rate of 18% per annum, and will continue until the date the note is paid in full, and (ii) the Company will issue to the 2017 Holder Note A an additional warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock for each ninety (90) calendar day period that the unpaid principal balance of the note and any accrued interest is not paid in full by such date. Upon conversion as extended, all other amounts payable underof Merger Date, the restated secured note areCompany had issued an additional 300,000 warrants to be forgiven.purchase shares resulting from the default of the loan.

 

The closing occurred on May 10, 2017.

F-16

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 8 – Debt-Continued

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $7,077 of interest expense. For the year ended December 31, 2017,the Company recorded interest expense of $ 28,566 and the $25,000 of original issue discount. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $7,077 of interest expense. As part of the closing proceduresdate of the merger on March 26, 2018, the principal amount of the promissory note of $175,000 and net settlement, weits accrued interest of $35,642 were converted at $2.50 per share into 139,567 shares of Common Stock.

On July 2017, the Company closed a private placement pursuant to a subscription agreement whereby an existing institutional investor (the “2017 Note B”) purchased a convertible note having a principal amount of $100,005, convertible into Common Stock of the Company at $2.00 per share and maturing on February 28, 2018. Interest on the note accrues at a rate of 8% annually payable upon maturity. It was determined that there were no aggregate beneficial conversion features. For the years ended December 31,2018 and2017, the Company recorded$1,822 and$3,778 of interest expense, respectively. As of the Merger Date, the principal amount of the promissory note of $100,005 and its accrued interest of $5,600 were converted at $1.25 per share into 139,943 shares of Common Stock.

On September 2017, the Company closed a private placement pursuant to a subscription agreement whereby an existing institutional investor (the “2017 Note C”) purchased a convertible note having a principal amount of $35,000, convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company at $2.00 per share and maturing on February 28, 2018. Interest on the note accrues at a rate of 8% annually payable upon maturity. It was determined that there were no aggregate beneficial conversion features. For the years ended December 31,2018 and2017, the Company recorded$638 and$731 of interest expense, respectively. As of the Merger Date, the principal amount of the promissory note of $35,000 and the accrued interest of $1,369 were converted at $1.25 per share into 48,194 shares of Common Stock.

On October 2017, the Company closed a private placement pursuant to a subscription agreement whereby an existing institutional investor purchased a convertible note having a principal amount of $50,000, (the “2017 Note D”) convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company at $2.00 per share and maturing on February 28, 2018. Interest on the note accrues at a rate of 8% annually payable upon maturity. It was determined that there were no aggregate beneficial conversion features. For the years ended December 31,2018 and2017, the Company recorded$911 and$811 of interest expense, respectively.Asof the Merger Date, the principal of $50,000 and the accrued interest of $1,722 were converted at $1.25 per share into 68,540 shares of Common Stock.

Promissory Notes

On December 15, 2016, the Company issued a promissory note to Pass Creek Resources LLC in thewith an aggregate principal amount of $105,806. The$30,000 to a shareholder of the Company. On January 24, 2017, the Company issued a second promissory bearsnote with an aggregate principal amount of $30,000 to the same related party. On September 14, 2017, the Company issued a third promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $16,050 to the same shareholder. All three promissory notes (the “Related Party Notes A”) accrue interest at 16% per annuman annual rate of 2% and matured on June 9,November 6, 2017. The amount due was not paid on June 9,On or about August 1, 2017, but the holder has not provided the Company a notice of default.

In connection with the May 10, 2017 closing and in consideration of the satisfaction of $13,425,000 of the amount due under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries transferred to PCR Holdings LLC, an affiliate of the successor lenders under the Credit Agreement, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties and assets located in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska, as well as the Company’s shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC)shareholder promissory note A holder entered into a Second Amendedextension and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above.

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees its subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties or assets.


On December 22, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Date of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provide notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of the First Amendment, the Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company alsomodification agreements whereby they agreed to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has the option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured noteRelated Party Notes A to April 30,February 28, 2018, upon paymentadded a conversion feature whereby the debt can be converted into shares of an extension feeCommon Stock of $50,000.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the next twelve months following the issuance of these financial statements. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unableat $2.00 per share and amended the interest rate on the note retroactively to continue asaccrue at a going concern.

Note 3 - Equity Transactions

Stock transactions inrate of 8% annually. It was determined that there were no aggregate beneficial conversion features. For the fiscal yearyears ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded$1,386 and$5,420 of interest expense, respectively. As of the Merger Date, the principal of $76,050 and the accrued interest of $7,239 were converted at $1.25 per share into 110,371 shares of Common Stock.

 

We

F-17

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 8 – Debt-Continued

On March 5, 2017, the Company issued a promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $10,000 to an executive of the Company. On May 15, 2017, the Company issued a second promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $10,000 to the same executive of the Company. On September 15, 2017, the Company issued a 3rd promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $32,000 to the same executive of the Company. On July 25, 2017, the Company issued a 3rd promissory note with an aggregate principal amount of $3,000 to the same executive of the Company with the amended terms agreed to on August 1, 2017 per the modification agreement. The promissory notes (the “Related Party Notes B”) accrue interest at an annual rate of 2% and mature on November 6, 2017. On or about August 1, 2017, the Company and the executive of the Company promissory note B holder entered into extension and modification agreements whereby they agreed to extend the maturity date of the Related Party Notes B to February 28, 2018, added a conversion feature whereby the debt can be converted into shares of Common Stock of the Company at $2.00 per share and amended the interest rate on the note retroactively to accrue at a rate of 8% annually. It was determined that there were no aggregate beneficial conversion features. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company recorded $1,002 and $2,684 of interest expense, respectively. As of the Merger Date, the principal of $55,000 and the accrued dividendsinterest of $3,518,430$3,686 were converted at $1.25 per share into 77,769 shares of Common Stock.

As of the Merger Date, all the AgEagle shares of Common Stock issued in connection with conversion of debt noted above were subsequently converted into EnerJex shares and then split at a rate of 25 to 1 resulting in a conversion rate of 1.6564 per AgEagle share into a total of 787,891 shares of EnerJex Common Stock and 1,631 shares of Series C Preferred Stock.

As part of the liabilities assumed from the EnerJex Merger, the Company recorded a promissory note for our Series A Preferred Stocka principal amount of $125,556 and accrued interest of $4,171 payable over twelve months and maturing on March 27, 2019. The total amount outstanding as of December 31, 2018 was $40,998, resulting in payments of $88,729 made in 2018. The Company recorded interest of $3,670 for the year ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, aggregate accumulated dividends payable to2018.

Note 9 – Equity

Capital Stock Issuances

As a result of the Merger all the holders of the Company’s 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock holders totaled $6,919,579.

On April 27, 2017, the Company entered(the “Series A Preferred Stock”) had their shares automatically converted into an Additional Issuance Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt, for the purchase of 300 restricted902,186 shares of its newly designatedthe Company’s Common Stock. The Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of 8.25 shares (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) remained outstanding and were convertible into 5,388 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in consideration for $300,000, with an option to purchase(the “Series C Preferred Stock”) included 2,879 of remaining shares after the conversion and retirement of all the Company’s promissory notes due. These shares are convertible into 1,471,425 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Furthermore, an additional 2004,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase pricewere issued and are convertible into 3,020,797 shares of $200,000. As of December 31, 2017, the Company hadCompany’s Common Stock, as they were issued 300 sharesto the current holder of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000. In addition, during the year ending December 31, 2017, the Company had received $200,000 from Alpha Capital Anstalt to purchase an additional 200 sharesin connection with a $4 million financing of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2017, theStock (the “Financing”).

On May 11, 2018, we issued an additional 200250 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock have not been issued and are reflected as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Issuable on the balance sheet in the aggregate amount of $200,000.

The Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature of $208,500 based on the fair value of the common stock and the conversion rate as of the date of issuance. This amount was recorded as a deemed distribution for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (“our Series C Preferred Stock”) is non-voting (except to the extent required by law and except for certain consent rights relating to amending the certificate of incorporation or bylaws, and the like), ranks senior to the common stock with respect to dividends and with respect to distributions upon a deemed dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company, and ranks junior to the Company’s Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock with respect to dividends and with respect to distributions upon a deemed dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company. Upon request of the holders, the Company can seek stockholder approval to remove the Issuance Limitation described therein and to allow for further adjustments related to anti-dilution protection, only if such stockholder approval is obtained. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and is convertible at the option of the holder at a conversion price equal to $0.30 per share, or a ratio equal to approximately 3,333into 163,265 shares of common stock for each one (1) shareour Common Stock and received a cash payment of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to customary adjustments. Dividends are payable on the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock only if and to the extent that dividends are payable on the common stock into which the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has no maturity date and can be redeemed by the Company beginning twelve months after the closing of the offering or upon a change of control$250,000 for the redemption price of $1,000 per share, as adjustable as provided in the designationissuance of the Series C Preferred Stock.

The Series C Preferred Stock includes a beneficial ownership limitation preventing conversion of shares of Series C Preferred Stock into more than 9.99% of the number of shares of common stockour Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stockCommon Stock upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock. In addition,

F-18

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 9 – Equity-Continued

On April 16, 2018, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted 8.25 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, representing the Company may not convertlast of the outstanding Series B shares, into 5,388 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $1.53.

During the year ended December 31 2018, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted 2,467 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into 1,611,082 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $1.53.

In connection with an investor relations agreement, dated April 4, 2018, the Company issued 60,000 shares of its Common Stock to the investor relations firm, and its designees, and agreed to register such shares on its next registration statement (the “Registration Rights”). On July 24, 2018, in connection with the filing of the Company’s registration statement on form S-1, a waiver of the Registration Rights was obtained from the investor relations firm in exchange for 125,000 additional shares, which were issued by the Company and approved by the Board. The Company recognized a total of $400,415 of investor relations expense at a fair value of $2.12 and $2.26 per share within general and administrative costs related to these issuances.

On August 28, 2018 and ninety-days thereafter, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement for Agribotix the Company issued 1,275,000 shares at a $2.00 share price.

 On December 4 ,2018, our former board director Mr. Scott Burell exercised 60,724 options at an exercise price of $0.06 resulting in the issuance of 55,801 shares as due to the Company’s withholding obligation relating to the exercise of these options some shares were held back.

On December 27, 2018, AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (the “Company”) entered into Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with an institutional investor (the “Purchaser”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) designated a new series of preferred stock, the Series D Preferred Stock, which is non-convertible and provides for an 8% annual dividend and is subject to optional redemption by the Company (the “Preferred Stock”). The Company issued 2,000 shares of Preferred Stock and a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 3,703,703 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), for $2,000,000 in gross proceeds. The shares of Common Stock underling the Warrant are referred to as the “Warrant Shares”. The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) granting registration rights to the Purchaser with respect to the Warrant Shares.

The Agreement provides that upon a subsequent financing or financings with net proceeds of at least $500,000, the Company must exercise its optional redemption of the Preferred Stock (as more fully described below in Item 5.03) and apply any and all net proceeds from such financing(s) to the redemption in full of the Preferred Stock.

Warrants Issued

The Warrants of 3,703,703 are exercisable for a period of five years through December 26, 2023, at an exercise price equal to $0.54 per share, and is subject to customary adjustments for stock splits dividend, rights offerings, pro rata distributions and fundamental transactions. In addition, in the event the Company undertakes a subsequent equity financing or financings at an effective price per share that is less than $0.54, the exercise price of the Warrant shall be reduced to the lower price.

The Warrant provides that the Warrant holder shall have a “Beneficial Ownership Limitation” equal to 9.99% of the number of shares of common stock which, when aggregated with anythe Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock issued onCommon Stock issuable upon exercise of this Warrant. The Warrant holder, upon notice to the Company, may increase or afterdecrease the original issue date and prior to such conversion dateBeneficial Ownership Limitation, as provided for in connection with any conversion of Series C Preferred Stock would exceed 1,683,944 shares of common stock (19.99% of the outstanding shares as of the original issue date), subject to adjustment for forward and reverse stock splits, recapitalizations and the like. In the event conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock is limited pursuant to these provisions, each holder shall be entitled to a pro rata portion of the issuable maximum.Warrant.

F-19

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 9 – Equity-Continued

 

Pursuant to the anti-dilutive provisionsterms of the Securities PurchaseRegistration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2015, which requires the Company to issue additional sharesshall file an initial registration statement registering the Warrant Shares no later than the 20thcalendar day following the required filing date of common stock to adjust the purchase price paid by purchasers in the Company’s March 2015 offering,Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2018 (the “Filing Date”) and, with respect to any additional registration statements, the earliest practical date on which the Company is permitted by SEC Guidance to file such additional registration statement related to such registrable securities. The Company shall have the registration statement declared effective with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) no later than the 90th calendar day following the Filing Date or, in the event any shares are sold (or convertible securities are sold), withof a price per share less than the purchase price paid“full review” by the March 2015 purchasers subjectCommission, the 120th calendar day following the Filing Date. There are no penalties for failure to file or be declared effective by the dates set forth above.

Options Issued

The Board of Directors of the Company has unanimously approved a proposal to adopt and approve the EnerJex 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Board of Directors recommended that this proposal be presented to the termsEnerJex shareholders for approval. The Plan became effective on March 26, 2018, the date of the Securities Purchase Agreement, Alpha Capital Anstalt received 597,461 shares of common stock,Merger, and is a comprehensive incentive compensation plan under which the Company recorded ascan grant equity-based and other incentive awards to officers, employees and directors of, and consultants and advisers to, the Company. The purpose of the Plan is to help the Company attract, motivate and retain such persons and thereby enhance shareholder value.

The Company has reserved a $300,000 deemed distribution In addition, the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion ratio equal to approximately 571total of 2,000,000 shares of common stockCommon Stock for each one (1) shareissuance as or under awards to be made under the Plan. To the extent that an award lapses, expires, is canceled, is terminated unexercised or ceases to be exercisable for any reason, or the rights of Preferred Stock resetits holder terminate, any shares subject to approximately 3,333such award shall again be available for the grant of a new award. The Plan shall continue in effect, unless sooner terminated, until the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date on which it is adopted by the Board of Directors (except as to awards outstanding on that date). The Board of Directors in its discretion may terminate the Plan at any time with respect to any shares for which awards have not theretofore been granted; provided, however, that the Plan’s termination shall not materially and adversely impair the rights of a holder, without the consent of the holder, with respect to any award previously granted. The number of shares for which awards which are options or SARs may be granted to a participant under the Plan during any calendar year is limited to 500,000. For purposes of qualifying awards as “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m), the maximum amount of cash compensation that may be paid to any person under the Plan in any single calendar year shall be $500,000.

On December 31, 2018, the Company issued options to purchase 534,598 shares of common stock for each one (1) share of Series B Convertible PreferredCommon Stock to directors and employees of the Company at the fair value exercise price ranging from $0.51 to $4.33 per share expiring on March 30, 2023 to December 17, 2028. The Company determined the fair-market value of the options to be consistent$449,491. In connection with the termsissuance of these options, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, pursuant toCompany recognized $102,698 stock compensation expense for the anti-dilution requirements of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The Company recorded a deemed distribution of $2,500,000 related to the down round triggering event of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. In addition, the warrants strike price of $2.75 reset to $0.30, to be consistent with the terms of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, pursuant to the anti-dilution requirements of the warrants. The Company recorded a deemed distribution of $500,000 related to the down round triggering event of the warrants.


During, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted 1,412 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 5,502,066 shares of common stock.year ended December 31, 2018.

 

On October 23,4, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt exercised warrantsAgEagle Sub issued options to purchase 1,000,000927,774 shares of our common stock forCommon Stock to employees and directors, that were approved by the board at an aggregate exercise price of $300,000 (or $0.30$0.06 per share), pursuant to the terms of such warrants, and was issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock.

On November 6, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt exercised warrants to purchase 771,428 shares of our common stock for an aggregate exercise price of $231,429 (or $0.30 per share), pursuant to the terms of such warrants, and was issued 771,428 shares of common stock.

On December 20, 2017share. These options were assumed by the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreementin the Merger. In connection with the issuance of these options to employees and directors for the sale of 1,061,750 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock was sold to Alpha Capital Anstalt at $0.0612 per share or an aggregate of $649,791. Pursuant to the anti-dilutive provisions of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Series C Preferred Stock and the warrants, the conversion and strike price reset from $0.30 to $0.612. The Company recorded a deemed distribution of $100,000 related to the down round triggering event of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Series C Preferred Stock and the warrants, in the aggregate.

On February 13,year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued Alpha Capital Anstalt the 200,000 sharesrecorded $7,895 of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock which it was due pursuant to the terms of the April 27, 2017, Additional Issuance Agreement, in considerationstock compensation expense and $22,192 for the $200,000 paid during the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

Subsequent to December

F-20

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017 Alpha Capital Anstalt converted (a) 343.671 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 5,610,955 shares of common stock; and (b) 103.142 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,683,944 shares of common stock, pursuant to the terms of such securities.

 

Stock transactions in fiscal year ended December 31, 2016Note 9 – Equity-Continued

 

ThereOn March 1, 2015, AgEagle Sub entered into a strategic consulting agreement with a related party and granted 207,055 stock options exercisable over five years from the grant date at an exercise price per share of $2.60. On October 4, 2017, AgEagle Sub held a board meeting to approve the modification of the existing 207,055 options to purchase Common Stock from an exercise price of $2.60 to $0.06 per share. These options were assumed by the Company in the Merger. In connection with these options, the Company recognized no equity transactionsstock compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Option transactions

Officers (including officers who are members of the Board of Directors), directors, employees and consultants are eligible to receive options under our stock option plans.  We administer the stock option plans and we determine those persons to whom options will be granted, the number of options to be granted, the provisions applicable to each grant and the time periods during which the options may be exercised.  No options may be granted more than ten years after the date of the adoption of the stock option plans.

Each option granted under the stock option plans will be exercisable for a term of not more than ten years after the date of grant.  Certain other restrictions will apply in connection with the plans when some awards may be exercised.  In the event of a change of control (as defined in the stock option plans), the vesting date on which2018 as they were all options outstanding under the stock option plans may first be exercised will be accelerated.  Generally, all options terminate 90 days after a change of control. 

Stock Incentive Planfully vested.

 

The Board of Directors approved the EnerJex Resources, Inc. Stock Option Plan on August 1, 2002 (the “2002-2003 Stock Option Plan”). Originally, the total numberfair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2018 were determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The expected term of options granted is based on the simplified method in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 and represents the period of time that couldoptions granted are expected to be granted underoutstanding. The Company makes assumptions with respect to expected stock price volatility based on the 2002-2003 Stock Option Plan was notaverage historical volatility of peers with similar attributes. In addition, the Company determines the risk-free rate by selecting the U.S. Treasury with maturities similar to exceed 26,666 shares. In September 2007 our stockholders approved a proposal to amend and restate the 2002-2003 Stock Option Plan to increaseexpected terms of grants, quoted on an investment basis in effect at the numbertime of shares issuable to 66,666.  On October 14, 2008 our stockholders approved a proposal to amend and restate the 2002-2003 Stock Option Plan to (i) rename it the EnerJex Resources, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”), (ii) increase the maximum number of shares of our common stockgrant for that may be issued under the Stock Incentive Plan to 83,333, and (iii) add restricted stock as an eligible award that can be granted under the Stock Incentive Plan.

2013 Stock Incentive Planbusiness day.

 

The Board and stockholders approvedsignificant weighted average assumptions relating to the adoptionvaluation of the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”). The Plan reserves 333,300 shares of our commonCompany’s stock foroptions granted during the granting of options and issuance of restricted shares to our employees, officers, directors, and consultants. The Plan increases reserved shares annually based on plan provisions.

In 2017 and 2016, no options were granted to any employees or directors.

We expensed $13,690 and $241,669 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 respectively for options granted.


A summary of stock options is2018 were as follows:

      Weighted Ave.     Weighted Ave. 
   Options  Exercise Price  Warrants  Exercise Price 
              
Outstanding January 1, 2016   288,331  $10.17   1,904,286  $2.75 
Granted             
Cancelled   (80,667)  (7.15)      
Exercised             
Outstanding December 31, 2016   207,664  $9.69   1,904,286  $2.75 
Granted             
Cancelled          
Exercised   (192,332)  (10.5)  (1,771,428  0.30 
Outstanding December 31, 2017   15,332  $7.63   132,858  $0.30 

The number of options that were vested at December 31, 2017 was 15,332. The were no options that were not vested at December 31, 2017.

 

Note 4 - Asset Retirement Obligation

  December 31,
2017
 March 31,
2018
 June 30,
2018
 September 30,
2018
 December 31,
2018
Dividend Yield  0%  0%  0%  0%  0%
Expected life  3.04 to 6.25 Years   3.5 Years   3.5 Years   3.5 Years   3.5-6.5 Years 
Expected volatility  74.80 to 80.41%   77.03%  78.66%  76.04%  80.5%
Risk-free interest rate  1.89 to 2.33%   2.81%  2.68%  3.01%  2.59%

  

Our asset retirement obligations relate toFor options granted in 2018, the abandonmentfair value of oil and gas wells. The amounts recognized are based on numerous estimates and assumptions, including future retirement costs, inflation rates and credit adjusted risk-free interest rates. The following shows the changes in asset retirement obligations:

Asset retirement obligations, January 1, 2016 $3,091,478 
Liabilities incurred during the period   
Liabilities settled during the year  (2,767)
Accretion  225,480 
Asset retirement obligations, December 31, 2016 $3,314,191 
Release of liabilities  (1,814,408)
Liabilities incurred during the period   
Liabilities settled during the year   
Accretion  112,062 
Asset retirement obligations, December 31, 2017 $1,611,845 

Note 5 - Long-Term Debt

Senior Secured Credit Facility   

On October 3, 2011, the Company, DD Energy, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC and Working Interest, LLC (collectively, “Borrowers”) entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank, and other financial institutions and banks that may become a party to the Credit Agreement from time to time. The facilities provided under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are to be used to refinance Borrowers prior outstanding revolving loan facility with Bank, dated July 3, 2008, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.

At our option, loans under the facility bear stated interest based on the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin, or Floating Rate plus Floating Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). The Base Rate will be, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (b) the Bank’s prime rate. The Floating Rate shall mean, at Borrower’s option, a per annum interest rate equal to (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus Eurodollar Margin, or (ii) the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). Eurodollar borrowings may be for one, two, three, or six months, as selected by the Borrowers. The margins for all loans are based on a pricing grid ranging from 0.00% to 0.75% for the Base Rate Margin and 2.25% to 3.00% for the Floating Rate Margin based on the Company’s Borrowing Base Utilization Percentage (as defined instock was obtained per the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).

We entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note in the amountclose of $50,000,000 with Texas Capital Bank, which closed on December 15, 2011. The Amendment reflects the addition of Rantoul Partners, as an additional Borrower and adds as additional security for the loans the assets held by Rantoul Partners.

On August 31, 2012, we entered into a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank. The Second Amendment: (i) increased the borrowing base to $7,000,000, (ii) reduced the minimum interest rate to 3.75%, and (iii) added additional new leases as collateral for the loan.


On November 2, 2012, we entered into a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank. The Third Amendment (i) increased the borrowing base to $12,150,000 and (ii) clarified certain continuing covenants and provided a limited waiver of compliance with one of the covenants so clarified for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011.

On January 24, 2013, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was made effectivemarket as of December 31, 2012 with Texas Capital Bank.2018. The Fourth Amendment reflectsfuture expected stock-based compensation expense expected to be recognized in future years is $288,401, through December 31, 2020.

Intrinsic value is measured using the following changes: (i)fair market value at the Bank consented todate of exercise (for shares exercised) or at December 31, 2018 (for outstanding options), less the restructuring transactions related to the dissolution of Rantoul Partners, and (ii) the Bank terminated a Limited Guaranty, as defined in the Credit Agreement, executed by Rantoul Partners in favorapplicable exercise price.

A summary of the Bank

On April 16, 2013, the Bank increased our borrowing base to $19.5 million.

On September 30, 2013, we entered into a Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Fifth Amendment reflects the following changes it: (i) expanded the principal commitment amount of the Bank to $100,000,000; (ii) increased the Borrowing Base to $38,000,000; (iii) added Black Raven Energy, Inc. to the Credit Agreement as a borrower party; (iv) added certain collateral and security interests in favor of the Bank; and (v) reduced the interest rate to 3.30%.

On November 19, 2013, we entered into a Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Sixth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the addition of Iberia Bank as a participant in our credit facility, and (ii) a technical correction to our covenant calculations.

On May 22, 2014, we entered into a Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Seventh Amendment reflects the Bank’s consent to our issuance of up to 850,000 shares of our 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock.

On August 15, 2014, we entered into an Eighth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eighth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the borrowing base was increased from $38 million to $40 million, and (ii) the maturity of the facility was extended by three years to October 3, 2018.

On April 29, 2015, we entered into a Ninth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. In the Ninth Amendment, the Bank (i) re-determined the Borrowing Base based upon the Reserve Report dated January 1, 2015, (ii) imposed affirmative obligations on the Company to use a portion of proceeds received with regard to future sales of securities or certain assets to repay the loan, (iii) consented to non-compliance by the Company with certain terms of the Credit Agreement, (iv) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, and (v) agreed to certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.

On May 1, 2015, the Borrowers and the Banks entered into a Letter Agreement to clarify that up to $1,000,000 in proceeds from any potential future securities offering will be unencumbered by the Banks’ liens as described in the Credit Agreement through November 1, 2015, and that, until November 1, 2015, such proceeds would not be subject to certain provisions in the Credit Agreement prohibiting the Company from declaring and paying dividends that may be due and payable to holders of securities issued in such potential offerings or issued prior to the Letter Agreement.

On August 12, 2015, we entered into a Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Tenth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) allow the Company to sell certain oil assets in Kansas, (ii) allow for approximately $1,300,000 of the proceeds from the sale to be reinvested in Company owned oil and gas projects and (iii) apply not less than $1,500,000 from the proceed of the sale to outstanding loan balances.

On November 13, 2015, the Company entered into an Eleventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eleventh Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, (ii) suspended certain hedging requirements, and (iii) made certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.

On April 1, 2016, the Company informed the Bank that it would cease making the mandatory monthly borrowing base reduction payments and did not make the required April 1, 2016 payment. The Company made its mandatory quarterly interest payments on April 6, 2016 and May 2, 2016. On April 7, 2016, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement whereby the Bank agreed to not exercise remedies and rights afforded it under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for thirty days. The thirty day period was to be used by the Company to pursue strategic alternatives.

On April 28, 2016 the Bank informed the Company that it would extend the above Forbearance Agreement period to May 31, 2016 upon effecting a principal reduction of $125,000. In addition, the Company will receive an automatic extension to September 15, 2016 upon meeting certain terms and conditions specified by the Bank. On May 31, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to August 31, 2016. On July 29, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to October 1, 2016. 


On October 1, 2016, the Company and the Bank could not reach an agreement to extend the Third Amendment to the Forbearance Agreement. Following this outcome, the Company decided to discontinue payment of interest on its outstanding loan obligations with the Bank. The Company continued to evaluate plans to restructure, amend or refinance existing debt through private options.

On February 10, 2017, the Company and the other Sellers entered into and completed the transactions contemplated by the LSA, described in greater detail in “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”.

Below is a table showing the reconciliation of the gain on LSA as set forth on the statement of operationsoptions activity for the year ended December 31, 2017:

Forgiveness of existing secured loan $17,925,000 
Forgiveness of accrued interest  1,306,801 
Issuance of secured promissory note  (4,500,000)
Transfer of oil and gas properties  (1,902,726)
Transfer of gas gathering system  (1,772,588)
Transfer of shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.  (210,990)
Transfer of ARO liability  1,814,407 
Transfer of other assets  (1,159,780)
Gain on LSA $11,500,124 

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC,2018, are as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above under “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”.  follows:

 

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under

  Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2018  1,134,830  $0.06   8.5 Years  $ 
Granted  534,598   1.35   5.94 Years  $ 
Exercised/Cancelled  (175,270)  0.60   - Years  $ 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  1,494,158  $0.46   6.93 Years  $ 
Exercisable at December 31, 2018  782,147  $0.22   7.07 Years  $ 

F-21

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 9 – Equity-Continued

For options granted or modified in 2017, the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien infair value of the Company’s andstock used in estimating the subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees the Subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and wastefair value of the Kansas oil properties or assets.stock options was estimated using a discounted cash flow method and recent sales of its Common Stock.

 

 Intrinsic value is measured using the fair market value at the date of exercise (for shares exercised) or at December 22,31, 2017 (for outstanding options), less the Company enteredapplicable exercise price.

A summary of the options activity for the year ended December 31, 2017 are as follows:

  For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
  Shares* Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of year  207,055  $0.06   4.0 years  $ 
Granted  927,775  $0.06   10.0 years  $ 
Outstanding at end of year  1,134,830  $0.06   8.5 years  $ 
Exercisable at end of year  521,873  $0.06   7.9 years  $ 

*- Amounts have been converted to reflect a stock split and conversion rate of 1.656 that occurred upon the EnerJex merger.

As of the Merger Date, all outstanding AgEagle shares of Common Stock and newly issued in connection with conversion of debt were subsequently converted into the First AmendmentEnerJex shares and then split at a rate of 25 to 1 resulting in a conversion rate of 1.6564 per AgEagle share. The financial statements give a retrospective effect to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are partiesreverse stock split.

Note 10 – Warrants to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Date of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provides notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of First Amendment, the Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has the option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.Purchase Common Stock

 

As of December 31, 2017,2018, the principal balanceCompany had outstanding, in connection with the issuance of $4,457,347 alongdebentures in the prior year, warrants to purchase 828,221 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.51. All warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2018 are scheduled to expire between February 2, 2024 and October 31, 2024.

On December 27, 2018, the Company issued 2,000 shares of Preferred Stock and a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 3,703,703 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), for $2,000,000 in gross proceeds. The shares of Common Stock underling the Warrant are referred to as the “Warrant Shares”. The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) granting registration rights to the Purchaser with accrued interestrespect to the Warrant Shares.

The Warrant is exercisable for a period of $479,452 remained due underfive years through December 26, 2023, at an exercise price equal to $0.54 per share, and is subject to customary adjustments for stock splits dividend, rights offerings, pro rata distributions and fundamental transactions. In addition, in the Amendedevent the Company undertakes a subsequent equity financing or financings at an effective price per share that is less than $0.54, the exercise price of the Warrant shall be reduced to the lower price.

The Warrant provides that the Warrant holder shall have a “Beneficial Ownership Limitation” equal to 9.99% of the number of shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of this Warrant. The Warrant holder, upon notice to the Company, may increase or decrease the Beneficial Ownership Limitation, as provided for in the Warrant.

F-22

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 10 – Warrants to Purchase Common Stock-Continued

A summary of activity related to warrants for the year ended December 31, 2018 follows:

  Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price ($) Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  828,221  $1.51   5.34 
Granted  3,703,703  $0.54   4.99 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  4,531,924  $0.72   5.05 
Exercisable at December 31, 2018  4,531,924  $0.72   5.05 

*- Amounts have been converted to reflect a stock split and Restated Credit Agreement. Atconversion rate of 1.656 that occurred upon the EnerJex merger.

A summary of activity related to warrants for the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company was not in compliance with certain covenants, and the loan may be called due by Pass Creek. The note is in default.follows:

 

  Shares* Weighted Average Exercise Price ($) Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
Outstanding at December 31, 2016    $    
Granted  828,221  $1.51   6.60 
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  828,221  $1.51   6.40 
Exercisable at December 31, 2017  828,221  $1.51   6.40 

As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $80,805 along with accrued interest of $9,616 remained due under the promissory note with Pass Creek Resources LLC. The note is in default.

On July 14, 2017, July 28, 2017*- Amounts have been converted to reflect a stock split and August 30, 2017, the Company entered into Secured Promissory Notes totaling $225,000 with Alpha Capital Anstalt, which have a maturity date of June 30, 2018, and accrue interest at aconversion rate of 8% per annum. The amount due under1.656 that occurred upon the notes is secured by a security interest, subordinate to certain other security interests of the Company, in substantially all of the Company's assets. The amount due under the notes is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at the option of Alpha Capital Anstalt, on identical terms as the outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (i.e., an initial conversion price of $0.30 per share, a 9.9% ownership limitation and certain anti-dilution rights, which currently result in a conversion price of $0.0612 per share). As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $225,000 remained due.EnerJex merger.

As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $113,750 along with accrued interest of $5,574, remained due under the promissory note with Robert Watson, the former CEO. The note is in default.

 

Note 6 -11 – Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company leases office space in Neodesha, Kansas for $500 a month. On August 22, 2018, the Company executed an amendment to the lease to renew the term of the lease for an additional one year terminating on September 30, 2019 with no option to renew unless approved by the city commission of Neodesha.

As a result of the Agribotix acquisition, the Company assumed a lease for offices in Boulder, Colorado for $2,000 a month. The lease ends on May 31, 2019 and has an option to terminate at any time with a 30-day prior notice period.

 

Rent expense was $13,600 and $3,900 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and 2016 was approximately $69,000 and $148,000, respectively. Future non-cancellable minimum lease payments are approximately, $10,000 for 2018.

 

Merger Agreement

On March 26, 2018, EnerJex Resources, Inc. (“EnerJex”), a Nevada company, consummated the transactions contemplated by that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 19, 2017, pursuant to which AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex, merged with and into AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., a privately held company organized under the laws of the state of Nevada (“AgEagle Sub”), with AgEagle Sub surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex (the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger, EnerJex changed its name to AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (the “Company”) and AgEagle Sub changed its name to “Eagle Aerial Systems, Inc.” The Company’s Common Stock will continue to trade on the NYSE American under its new symbol “UAVS” commencing on March 27, 2018. As a result of the Merger, through AgEagle Sub, the Company is now engaged in the business of designing, developing, producing, distributing and supporting technologically-advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones) that it supplies to the precision agriculture industry.


F-23

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies-Continued

Each share of Common Stock issued and outstanding and underlying options and warrants of AgEagle Sub outstanding immediately prior to the Merger was exchanged for 1.66 shares of Company Common Stock (the “Exchange Ratio”). As a result, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), 5,439,526 shares of AgEagle Sub’s capital stock, representing all currently outstanding shares of Common Stock and all other debt or equity securities convertible into Common Stock (except options and warrants as described below) were automatically converted into 7,944,941 shares of Company Common Stock. In addition, at the Effective Time, 685,100 outstanding options and 500,000 warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle Sub Common Stock were assumed by EnerJex and converted into 1,134,830 options and 828,221 warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company.

All holders of EnerJex’s 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) had their shares automatically converted into 896,640 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. EnerJex’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) remains outstanding, and 1,624 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) are now convertible into 1,060,432 shares of Company Common Stock. Furthermore, an additional 5,051 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, convertible into 3,298,348 shares of Company Common Stock, were issued to the current holder of Series C Preferred Stock in connection with a $4 million financing of Series C Preferred Stock (the “Financing”) and the conversion and retirement of $425,000 in prior EnerJex promissory notes due and owing to such holder.

As of the Effective Time, the former shareholders of AgEagle Sub owned approximately 67% of the Company’s Common Stock (inclusive of the AgEagle Sub assumed stock options and warrants), the former EnerJex holders of Common Stock, the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock, which were outstanding immediately prior to the Financing, collectively own 12.7% of the Company’s Common Stock on a fully-diluted basis.

In connection with the Merger, AgEagle waived the requirement for EnerJex to have paid and satisfied in full all outstanding indebtedness of EnerJex such that there would be no continuing liabilities of EnerJex subsequent to the closing of the Merger (“Liability Condition”). In consideration for AgEagle waiving the Liability Condition, the 1,215,278 shares of Common Stock to be held in escrow (valued at $350,000) owned by certain former principal stockholders, officers and directors of EnerJex to secure losses, if any, that may be suffered by the AgEagle indemnified parties pursuant to the indemnification obligations under the Merger Agreement, were never issued and such former principal stockholders, officers and directors are not entitled to receive such shares. However, such former principal stockholders, officers and directors received, in the aggregate, deferred salaries and fees valued at approximately $297,500. In lieu of payment of the deferred salaries and fees in cash, such amounts have been converted into an aggregate of 1,032,986 shares of Company Common Stock.

Prior to the Merger, EnerJex operated as an oil exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration and production of oil in Eastern Kansas. In connection with the Merger, EnerJex disposed of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties.

F-24

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies-Continued

Employment and Board Agreements

On July 10, 2018, the Company appointed Corbett Kull as an independent director to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). Mr. Kull’s appointment fills a vacancy on the Board.

As compensation for his services as an independent director, Mr. Kull received an initial grant of 41,250 stock options at an exercise price of $1.77 per share (the “Initial Grant”). The Initial Grant is exercisable for a period of five years and vests in equal quarterly installments over a one-year period from the date of grant. In addition, Mr. Kull will receive a quarterly grant of 16,500 with an exercise price at the current market price of the Company’s Common Stock at the time of issuance (the “Quarterly Options”). The Quarterly Options are exercisable for a period of five years from the date of grant and vest in equal quarterly installments over a period of two years from the date of grant.

Effective November 21, 2018, Mr. Scott Burell resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company and his positions as a member of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Chairman of the Audit Committee. As a result of his resignation, Mr. Burell did not receive any options for the last quarter of 2018 as options are awarded upon completion of the term. To replace Mr. Burell, Ms. Louisa Ingargiola was appointed on November 27, 2018 as a director of the Board of Directors of the Company, a member of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Chairman of the Audit Committee.

Pursuant to his offer letter Mr. Louisa Ingargiola is entitled to receive for his service on the board: (1) an initial grant of five-year options to purchase 41,250 shares of Common Stock upon appointment, which was at an exercise price of $0.77 (equal to the market price of our Common Stock on the date of grant) that will vest in equal installments every calendar quarter over a one year period; and (2) five-year options to purchase 16,500 shares of Common Stock per calendar quarter of service at an exercise price per share equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issuance that will vest in equal installments every calendar quarter for the two year period after date the grant.

Effective as of July 18, 2018, Mr. Barrett Mooney joined the Company as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bret Chilcott, founder of the Company, stepped down as Chief Executive Officer, but will remain with the Company as President and Chairman of the Board.

Pursuant to an employment offer letter dated July 9, 2018, Mr. Mooney will receive as compensation for his services as Chief Executive Officer a base salary of $220,000 per year, which shall be subject to annual performance review by the Compensation Committee of the Board and may be revised by the Board, in its sole discretion. Mr. Mooney received an initial grant of 75,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company which is fully vested. Mr. Mooney was also eligible to receive an award of 75,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company which fully vested as of January 1, 2019 if, and only if, the stock price of the Company reached $3.55 per share and the closing price per share was at or above such price at the end of the day on January 1, 2019.

In addition, Mr. Mooney is eligible to receive an award of 20,000 non-qualified stock options under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) upon securing one sustainability pilot program on or before October 31, 2018, and an additional award of 30,000 non-qualified stock options under the Equity Plan upon securing a second sustainability pilot program on or before January 31, 2019. Both awards shall provide for immediate vesting and exercisability at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s shares of Common Stock underlying the options as of the date of grant. Mr. Mooney will also be eligible to receive an award of up to 55,000 non-qualified stock options under the Equity Plan based upon the results of his annual performance review in the first quarter of 2019.

F-25

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies-Continued

Effective December 18, 2018, an amendment was signed for the original employment offer letter dated July 9, 2018 hereby providing an amendment to provide that in lieu of the issuance of 75,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company (the “Shares”), the Company shall award to Executive 125,000 Nonqualified Stock Options (the “Stock Options”) under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”). The Stock Options shall be subject to the terms of the Equity Plan and standard option award agreement which shall have a term of 10 years and provide for vesting over a one-year period and exercisability at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock as of the date of the grant. The award of 75,000 shares were returned to the company and immediately cancelled.

Note 12 — Related Party Transactions

The following reflects the related party transactions during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Consulting Agreement

On March 1, 2015, the Company entered into a strategic consulting agreement to assist it with raising capital and strategic positioning in an effort to increase its valuation. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to issue 125,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock on May 1, 2015, an additional 125,000 shares of Common Stock on January 15, 2016 and 125,000 stock options exercisable for five years from the issuance date. As of December 31, 2015, no shares were issued to the consultant. The Company recognized $1,250,000 of consulting expense during 2015 and 2016 related to the value of the shares earned, which was based on the estimated fair value of the stock as of December 31, 2015, based on the terms of a transaction which ultimately closed on February 22, 2016 by issuing 500,000 shares of its Common Stock, as there was no dis-incentive for non-performance. During 2016, the Company recognized $555,556 of consulting expense related to the issuance of the Common Stock and $138,802 related to the stock options. No additional expense was recorded for the year-ended December 31, 2017 for the common shares granted in connection with the strategic consulting agreement executed in March 2015. During the 2017, the Company hasrecognized $6,397 of additional consulting expense related to the issuance of the Common Stock for the stock options as a result of the modification of the exercise price of the options from $2.60 per share to $0.10 per share.

Promissory Notes

The Company issued promissory notes for an outstanding irrevocable letter of credit in theaggregate amount of $50,000 issued in favor$76,050 (the “Related Party Notes A”) that accrued interest at an annual rate of 8% and were set to mature as of the Texas Railroad Commission. This letterdate of creditthe Merger. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded$1,386 and$5,420 of interest expense, respectively. As of the Merger Date, the principal of $76,050 and the accrued interest of $7,239 were converted at $1.25 per share into 110,371 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

The Company issued promissory notes for an aggregate amount of $55,000 (the “Related Party Notes B”) that accrued interest at an annual rate of 8% and were set to mature as of the date of the Merger. It was determined that there were no aggregate beneficial conversion features. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company recorded $1,002 and $2,684 of interest expense, respectively. As of the Merger Date, the principal of $55,000 and the accrued interest of $3,686 were converted at $1.25 per share into 77,769 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

F-26

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

Note 12 — Related Party Transactions-Continued

Transactions with Officers

The Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Nicole Fernandez-McGovern, is required byone of the Commission by all companies operatingprincipals of Premier Financial Filings, a full-service financial printer. Premier Financial Filings provided contracted financial services to the Company and their related expenses have been included within general and administrative expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2018, Premier Financial Filings provided services to the Company resulting in fees of $13,302, and an accounts payable of $1,915 as of December 31, 2018.

Note 13 – Income Taxes

Prior to April 15, 2015, AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. was treated as a disregarded entity for income tax purposes. Income taxes, if any, were the stateresponsibility of the sole member. In April 2015, the Company was converted to a corporation.

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with limits prescribed byFASB ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income Taxes which requires the Texas Railroad Commission.

We, asCompany to provide a lesseenet deferred tax asset or liability equal to the expected future tax benefit or expense of temporary reporting differences between book and operatortax accounting and any available operating loss or tax credit carryforwards. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the total of oilall deferred tax assets was $1,400,620 and gas properties, are subject to various federal, state$899,073 respectively. The amount of and local laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protectionultimate realization of the environment. Thesebenefits from the deferred tax assets for income tax purposes is dependent, in part, upon the tax laws in effect, the Company’s future earnings, and regulations may, among other things, impose liability onfuture events, the lessee under an oil and gas lease foreffects of which cannot be determined. Because of the costuncertainty surrounding the realization of pollution clean-up resulting from operations and subject the lessee to liability for pollution damages. In some instances,deferred tax assets the Company may be directed to suspend or cease operations in the affected area.  Ashas established a valuation allowance of December 31, 2017, we have no reserve for environmental remediation$1,400,620 and are not aware of any environmental claims.

On September 23, 2016, the Company, American Standard Energy Corporation, Baylor Operating LLC, Bernard Given and Loeb & Loeb LLP were sued by Geronimo Holdings Corporation and Randal Capps in the 143rd Judicial District Court located in Pecos, Texas. The suit among other things, seeks damages for an alleged unlawful sale of properties in Crockett County Texas and for alleged unpaid royalties. The Company believes the suit is without merit and will vigorously defend itself. The Company has faith that it will prevail and at December 31, 2017 no reserve for potential losses arising from this matter has been recorded. Additionally under its agreement with Baylor Operating LLC, Baylor has agreed to indemnify and defend the Company against all lawsuits and claims including this one.

On April 26, 2016, C&F Ranch, LLC sued the Company in Allen County Kansas for alleged breach of contract related to the rental of certain lands located on the C&F Ranch. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company settled this dispute for $9,000.

Note 7 - Income Taxes

There was no current or deferred income tax expense (benefit)$899,073 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, andrespectively. The change in the valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2016.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the statutory federal rate:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Statutory tax rate  35.00%  35.00%
State tax rate, net of federal tax  2.01%  1.78%
Other permanent items  0.00%  0.00%
Change in valuation allowance  (37.01)%  (36.78)%
Effective tax rate  0.00%  0.00%

Significant components of the deferred tax assets2018 and liabilities are as follows:2017 was $501,548 and $192,125 respectively.

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Non-current deferred tax asset:        
Oil and gas costs and long-lived assets $4,764,420  $11,500,697 
Derivative instruments      
Net operating loss carry-forward  21,547,347   35,815,113 
Valuation allowance  (26,311,767)  (47,315,809)
Net deferred tax asset (liability) $  $ 

 

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)(the “Act”) was signed into law. The TCJA, among other things, includesAct decreases the reductionU.S. corporate federal income tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% effective January 1, 2018. The impact of the federalre-measurement on the Corporation’s net deferred tax rate for corporations from 35% to 21%asset, as of December 31, 2017, was an approximately $99,539 decrease in deferred tax assets, with a corresponding decrease in the Company’s valuation allowance, and changes or limits certainno impact on income tax deductionsexpense. The Act also includes a number of other provisions including, among others, the utilizationelimination of net operating losses. Under generally accepted accounting principles,loss carrybacks and limitations on the Company is required to revalue its deferred tax assets and liabilities duringuse of future losses, the period in which the new tax legislation is enacted. The impact of TCJA resulted in a decrease in the Company's deferred tax assets in the amount of $18 million. However, there is no impactrepeal of the revaluation toAlternative Minimum Tax regime and the current net income because it was fully offset by the releaserepeal of the valuation allowance that was previously recorded againstdomestic production activities deduction. These provisions are not expected to have a material effect on the deferred tax asset.Corporation.

Given the significant complexity of the Act and anticipated additional implementation guidance from the Internal Revenue Service, further implications of the Act may be identified in future periods.

 

At December 31, 2017, we have2018, the Company had a net operating loss carry forward of approximately $93$2 million expiring in 2021-2038 that is subject to certain limitations on an annual basis. Such limitation has not been determined, by Management.2035-2037. Approximately a $100,000 of net operating loss carry forward with no expiration. Management has determined that a 100% valuation allowance be established against net operating losses where it is more likely than not that such losses will expire or will not be available before they are utilized.

 

The Company incurred a change of control as defined byacquired EnerJex, Inc. in 2018 and changed the Internal Revenue Code (IRC 382). Accordingly, the rules will limit the utilization of the Company’s net operating losses.name from EnerJex, Inc. to AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. The limitation is determined by multiplying the value of the stock immediately before the ownership change by the applicable long-term exempt rate. It is estimated that approximately $40.9 million offederal net operating losses may be subject to an annual limitation. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. The amount of the limitation may under certain circumstances be increasedforward by the built-in gains in assets held by the Company at the time of the change that are recognized in the five-year period after the change. No assurance can be made, asEnerJex, Inc. prior to the availability ofacquisition are not available to the Company. This limitation is due to the IRC 382 limitation requirement that the business that generated the net operating losses based upon Internal Revenue Code (IRC 382), as described, and such amountscontinue for a minimum of net operating losses available, based upontwo years after the limitations described. If there was or is other changes of ownership, the net operating losses may be a totally unavailable to offset taxable incomeacquisition..

 

Internal Revenue Code (IRC 108), Income from discharge of indebtedness has rules to determine amounts that are required to be included or excluded from taxable income, based upon certain circumstances. Management has determined that any discharge of indebtedness that has occurred is included in taxable income for this period, but is reviewing such amounts, as it applied to IRC 108.

F-27

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017

 


Note 8 - Fair Value Measurements

We hold certain financial assets which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157,“Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC Topic 820-10”).   ASC Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are described below:

Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access.  We believe receivables, payables and our debt approximate fair value at December 31, 2017.

Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.  We consider the derivative liability to be Level 2.  We determine the fair value of the derivative liability utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX price quotations and contract terms.

Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. We consider the marketable securities to be a Level 3.

At December 31, 2016, our marketable securities had a value of $210,990. During 2017, as part of the LSA transaction described in “Note 213Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”, we transferred the marketable securities. At December 31, 2017, we held no assets valued at Level 3. 

Note 9 - Derivative Instruments

We enter into derivative or physical arrangements with respect to portions of our crude oil production to reduce our sensitivity to volatile commodity prices and/or to meet hedging requirements under our Credit Facility.  We believe that these derivative arrangements, although not free of risk, allowed us to achieve a more predictable cash flow and to reduce exposure to commodity price fluctuations.  However, derivative arrangements limit the benefit of increases in the prices of crude oil.  Moreover, our derivative arrangements apply only to a portion of our production.

We had an Inter-creditor Agreement in place between the Company; our counterparties, BP Corporation North America, Inc. and Cargill Incorporated and our agent, Texas Capital Bank, N.A., which allows Texas Capital Bank to also act as agent for the counterparties for the purpose of holding and enforcing any liens or security interests resulting from our derivative arrangements.  Therefore, we were not required to post additional collateral, including cash.

At December 31, 2017 all derivative contracts had expired and we did not enter into any derivative contracts during 2017. 

We recorded a loss related to the mark to market of our derivative contracts for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $2,531,401. No gain or loss was recorded in 2017. 

Note 10 - Net Income Per Common Share

The Company reports earnings per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260-10,“Earnings per Share.” Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.


Note 11 - Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties

Pursuant to full cost accounting rules, the Company must perform a ceiling test each quarter on its proved oil and natural gas assets within each separate cost center. All of the Company’s costs are included in one cost center because all of the Company’s operations are located in the United States. The Company’s ceiling test was calculated using trailing twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the-month prices for oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2017, which were based on a West Texas Intermediate oil price of $51.34 per Bbl and a Henry Hub natural gas price of $2.97 per MMBtu (adjusted for basis and quality differentials), respectively. The trailing twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the-month prices for oil and natural gas as of September 30, 2017, was based on a West Texas Intermediate oil price of $42.46 per Bbl and a Henry Hub natural gas price of $2.63 per MMBtu (adjusted for basis and quality differentials), respectively. The twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the –month price as of June 30, 2017 was $42.46 per Bbl and $2.63per MMBtu The twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the –month price as of March 31, 2017 was $45.16 per Bbl and $2.40 per MMBtu (adjusted for basis and quality differentials), respectively. Utilizing these prices, the calculated ceiling amount was greater than the net capitalized cost of oil and natural gas properties as of December 31, 2017, and as a result, no write down was recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $8,032,670. Additional material write-downs of the Company’s oil and gas properties could occur in subsequent quarters in the event that oil and natural gas prices remain at current depressed levels, or if the Company experiences significant downward adjustments to its estimated proved reserves.

Note 12 - Other IncomeTaxes-Continued

 

The following table depicts the components of other income tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 andconsist of the following:

  2018 2017
Deferred tax benefit:        
Federal $(435,942) $(166,991)
State  (65,606)  (25,134)
Increase in valuation allowance $(501,548) $(192,125)

A reconciliation of income tax expense at the federal statutory rate to income tax expense at the Company’s effective rate for the years ended December 31 2016:is as follows:

 

  Year ended
December 31,
2017
  Year ended
December 31,
2016
 
       
Realized gain (loss) clearing of derivative contracts $  $2,382,184 
Service Agreement with Camber Energy, Inc.  696,774    
Miscellaneous income  72   24,124 
Interest income  (3,967  32 
Other income (loss) $692,879  $2,406,340 
  2018 2017
  Amount Rate Amount Rate
Computed tax at the expected statutory rate $(436,733)  21.00% $(271,053)  34.00%
State and local income taxes, net of federal  (65,606)  3.16   (20,998)  2.64 
Other non-deductible expenses  743   (0.04)  387   (0.05)
Change due to impact of tax rates     (0.00)  99,502   (12.49)
Provision to return true up  48   (0.00)  37   (0.00)
Change in valuation allowance  501,548   (24.12)  192,125   (24.10)
Income tax benefit $   0.00% $   0.00%

 

On April 27,The temporary differences, tax credits and carryforwards that gave rise to the following deferred tax assets at December 31 is as follows:

Deferred tax assets: 2018 2017
Deferred revenue $1,182  $ 
Property and equipment  6,221   5,209 
Interest  5,826   38,629 
Goodwill amortization  (17,876)   
Intangibles tax amortization  7,488    
Stock options for consulting services employees and directors  32,083   5,363 
Stock options for consulting services-related party  51,878   51,878 
Common Stock for consulting services-related party  302,000   302,000 
Warrant expense  2,194   2,194 
Net operating loss carryforward  1,021,276   493,751 
Total Deferred tax assets  1,400,620   899,024 
Valuation allowance  (1,400,620)  (899,024)
Net Deferred tax assets $  $ 

F-28

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017 the Company entered into a Services Agreement (“Service Agreement”) with Camber Energy, Inc., to perform certain outsourced interim services for $150,000 per month. Effective December 4, 2017, the Company and Camber Energy, Inc. (“Camber”), mutually agreed to terminate the agreement between the parties effective November 30, 2017.

 

Note 13 -14- Subsequent Events

 

Preferred C Share ConversionsOn

During the month of January 31, 2018, the Company extended the end date of its previously disclosed Agreement and Plan of with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”) to March 31, 2018.

On February 20, 2018, the Company announced that it set the record date for the special meeting of its shareholders to, among other things, consider and vote on various proposals necessary to close the previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 19, 2017 (the “Merger Agreement”), with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. Shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 20, 2018, will be entitled to vote at the special meeting on March 21, 2018. The Merger is subject to certain customary closing conditions and approval from our shareholders. The Merger is expected to close in the first quarter of 2018. 

As previously reported, on April 27, 2017, the Company entered into an Additional Issuance Agreement with2019, Alpha Capital Anstalt for the purchase of 300 restricted shares of the Company’s then newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in consideration for $300,000, with an option to purchase an additional 200converted 270 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchaseinto 433,369 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $200,000. As$0.54.

During the month of December 31, 2017, the Company had issued 300February 2019, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted 216 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchaseinto 400,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $300,000. In addition, during$0.54.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had received $200,000 frommonth of March 2019, Alpha Capital Anstalt to purchase an additional 200converted 540 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which shares had not been issued as of December 31, 2017, and which are reflected as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Issuable on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, in the aggregate amount of $200,000.

On February 13, 2018, the Company issued Alpha Capital Anstalt the 200,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock which it was due pursuant to the terms of the April 27, 2017, Additional Issuance Agreement, in consideration for the $200,000 paid during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted (a) 343.671 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 5,610,9551,000,000 shares of common stock;Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.54.

New Employment Agreement with Chief Financial Officer

Effective January 1, 2019, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern signed a new employment agreement with the Company, whereby her annual base salary increased to $180,000 and (b) 103.142a ten-year grant of 50,000 stock options to purchase shares of Series C Convertible PreferredCommon Stock into 1,683,944 sharesat an exercise price of common$0.54 were granted. In addition, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern will continue to receive quarterly awards of 12,000 stock pursuantoptions to purchase Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the termsmarket price of such securities.our Common Stock at the time of issue during the term of her employment. All of the awards will vest equally over two years.

 

At a special meeting of shareholders held on March 21, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved (a) the issuance of the Company’s common stock to the shareholders of AgEagle in connection with and pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement in accordance with NYSE American Rules 712 and 713; (b) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to amend the 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment for a reverse stock split (discussed below)), and (iv) increase the number of Series A Preferred shares by 241,599 shares; (c) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.”; (d) the adoption of the EnerJex 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); (e) the issuance of 2,248,264 shares of common stock to current officers and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s obligations under the Merger Agreement; (f) the conversion of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (g) the conversion of the Company’s 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (h) the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, conversion of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock and conversion of $425,000 owed under five promissory notes held by, Alpha Capital Anstalt, of which $200,000 of the notes have previously been converted into Series C Preferred Stock as of the date of this filing, into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American.

The Plan provides for the grant of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock (such number based on a post-reverse split amount) as awards which may include incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), unrestricted shares, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, SARs, tandem stock appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, or any combination of the foregoing, to key management employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (however, solely Company employees or employees of the Company’s subsidiaries are eligible for incentive stock option awards).

Additionally, the Company plans to conduct a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was approved by Company shareholders on April 27, 2017, prior to the closing of the Merger, which the Company anticipates occurring prior to March 31, 2018.F-29

 F-22

 

Note 14 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)

Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities

The following table shows the results of operations from the Company’s oil and gas producing activities.  Results of operations from these activities are determined using historical revenues, production costs and depreciation and depletion. The results of operations from the Company’s oil and gas producing activities below exclude non-oil and gas revenues, general and administrative expenses, interest income and interest expense. Income tax expense was determined by applying the statutory rates to pretax operating results.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Production revenues $1,329,005  $2,461,727 
Production costs  (1,363,946)  (2,661,258)
Depletion and depreciation  (127,713)  (254,329)
Income tax  56,929   158,851 
Results of operations for producing activities $(105,725) $(295,009)

Capitalized costs

The following table summarizes the Company’s capitalized costs of oil and gas properties.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Properties subject to amortization $10,008,764  $18,626,746 
Accumulated depletion  (8,597,539)  (15,189,716)
Net capitalized costs $1,411,225  $3,437,030 

Cost incurred in property acquisition, exploration and development activities

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Acquisition of properties $  $14,399 
Exploration costs      
Development costs     2,690 
Net capitalized costs $  $17,089 

Estimated quantities of proved reserves

Our ownership interests in estimated quantities of proved oil and gas reserves and changes in net proved reserves all of which are located in the United States are summarized below.  Proved reserves are estimated quantities of oil and gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those that are expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Reserves are stated in barrels of oil equivalent. Geological and engineering estimates by Cobb & Associates, Inc. of proved oil and gas reserves at one point in time are highly interpretive, inherently imprecise and subject to ongoing revisions that may be substantial in amount. Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure that the reserve estimates are accurate, by their nature reserve estimates are generally less precise than other estimates presented in connection with financial statement disclosures.

    December 31, 2017      December 31, 2016   
Proved Reserves Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
  Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
 
                   
Beginning                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  372,140   152,610   524,750   1,287,028   202,884   1,489,912 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  44,780      44,780   47,345      47,345 
Natural Gas MCF’s  2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970   3,195,895   3,029,514   6,225,409 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  864,648   723,042   1,587,690   1,867,041   707,819   2,574,860 
                         
Revisions of previous estimates                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (30,572)  236,390   205,818   (856,765)  (50,274)  (907,039)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  1,870      1,870   (2,127)     (2,127)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (1,491)     (1,491)  (461,536)  392,651   (68,885)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (28,876)  236,390   207,514   (935,815)  15,169   (920,638)
                         
LSA Disposition                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (242,924)     (242,924)         
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (44,709)     (44,709)         
Natural Gas MCF’s  (2,684,865)  (3,422,165)  (6,107,030)         
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (735,110)  (570,432)  (1,305,542)         
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s                  
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (31,834)     (31,824)  (58,123)     (58,123)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (1,941)     (1,941)  (528)     (528)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (449)     (449)  (47,554)     (47,554)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (33,851)     (33,851)  (66,578)     (66,578)
                         
Ending                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   372,140   152,610   524,750 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s           44,780      44,780 
Natural Gas MCF’s           2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   864,648   723,042   1,587,690 


Estimated quantities of proved reserves

Our ownership interests in estimated quantities of proved oil and gas reserves and changes in net proved reserves all of which are located in the United States are summarized below.  Proved reserves are estimated quantities of oil and gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those that are expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Reserves are stated in barrels of oil equivalent. Geological and engineering estimates by Cobb & Associates, Inc. of proved oil and gas reserves at one point in time are highly interpretive, inherently imprecise and subject to ongoing revisions that may be substantial in amount. Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure that the reserve estimates are accurate, by their nature reserve estimates are generally less precise than other estimates presented in connection with financial statement disclosures.

    December 31, 2017      December 31, 2016   
Proved Reserves Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
  Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
 
                   
Beginning                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  372,140   152,610   524,750   1,287,028   202,884   1,489,912 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  44,780      44,780   47,345      47,345 
Natural Gas MCF’s  2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970   3,195,895   3,029,514   6,225,409 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  864,648   723,042   1,587,690   1,867,041   707,819   2,574,860 
                         
Revisions of previous estimates                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (30,572)  236,390   205,818   (856,765)  (50,274)  (907,039)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  1,870      1,870   (2,127)     (2,127)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (1,491)     (1,491)  (461,536)  392,651   (68,885)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (28,876)  236,390   207,514   (935,815)  15,169   (920,638)
                         
LSA Disposition                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (242,924)     (242,924)         
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (44,709)     (44,709)         
Natural Gas MCF’s  (2,684,865)  (3,422,165)  (6,107,030)         
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (735,110)  (570,432)  (1,305,542)         
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s                  
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (31,834)     (31,824)  (58,123)     (58,123)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (1,941)     (1,941)  (528)     (528)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (449)     (449)  (47,554)     (47,554)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (33,851)     (33,851)  (66,578)     (66,578)
                         
Ending                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   372,140   152,610   524,750 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s           44,780      44,780 
Natural Gas MCF’s           2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   864,648   723,042   1,587,690 

Proved developed reserves at December 31, 2016 consisted of approximately 42% oil and 58% natural gas and totaled 879.8 MBOEs. Proved developed reserves for December 31, 2017 consisted of approximately 100% oil and totaled 66.8 MBOEs. Proved undeveloped reserves for December 31, 2016 were 707.8 MBOEs. Proved undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2017 were 389.0 MBOEs.

The Company annually reviews its proved undeveloped reserves to ensure an appropriate plan for development exists. The Company books proved undeveloped reserves only if it plans to convert these reserves to proved developed producing reserves within five years from the date they were first booked. At December 31, 2017 proved undeveloped reserves were approximately 389.0 MBOE’s. The Company plans to develop all the remaining locations that comprise the 389.0 MBOE of proved undeveloped reserves within five years. However, the decision to deploy capital and the timing of those expenditures is contingent on many different factors. The Company estimates capital expenditures of approximately $5.0 million will be sufficient to develop these reserves. The development plans assume a continued improvement in commodity pricing and general market conditions within the oil and gas industry.  

The calculation of proved undeveloped reserves requires the Company to make predictions regarding future acquisitions and discoveries and the impact they may have on the Company’s overall development plan of properties it currently owns. The development plan is revised to reflect changes in the oil and gas industry, including changing markets and prices, and new investment opportunities, and such revisions will result in changes to our proved undeveloped reserves. Consequently, the exact timing of capital expenditures will be heavily dependent upon the Company’s interpretation of market opportunities which are deeply influenced by projections of future commodity prices. Each year we will review our five year development plan to maximize the value of our investment in oil and gas assets and in turn maximize shareholder value. At December 31, 2017 we believe the following best characterizes our development plan.

  Estimated Conversion of
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
 
  CAPEX ($MM)  MBOE’s 
2018  648.0   77.5 
2019  965.9   93.5 
2020  1,244.8   80.7 
2021  563.8   37.5 
2022  1550.6   99.7 

For the year ended December 31, 2017 proved reserves decreased 1,131.9 MBOEs of which production accounted for 33.9 MBOEs or 3.0% of the decrease. The disposition of assets included in the Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”) transaction resulted in a 1,305.5 MBOE decrease. An offsetting increase of 207.5 MBOEs, was due primarily to decreases in commodity prices. Crude oil prices increased $0.63 or 1%. Increased commodity pricing triggered positive revisions of 139.0 MBOEs of crude oil classified as proved undeveloped. In 2017 there were no material transfers from the proved undeveloped category of 6 reserves to the proved developed category.


For the year ended December 31, 2016 proved reserves decreased 987.1 MBOEs of which production accounted for 66.6 MBOEs or 6.7% of the decrease. The remaining decrease of 920.6 MBOEs, was due primarily to decreases in commodity prices. Crude oil prices decreased $3.49 or 8% and natural gas prices declined 20% or $.37. Diminished commodity pricing triggered negative revisions of 898.9 MBOEs of crude oil classified as proved developed producing. Natural gas liquids decreased pricing resulted in decreases of 3.6 MBOEs to the proved developed producing category. Reduced natural gas prices also reduced amounts classified as proved developed producing by 108.6 MMCF’s. In 2016 there were no material transfers from the proved undeveloped category of 6 reserves to the proved developed category.

In 2017 the Company invested approximately $4,600 in its oil and gas properties. These reduced expenditures were in response to extremely low commodity prices. The Company has approximately $1.0 million of current asset on hand and important infrastructure in Colorado completed which will facilitate the exploitation and development of proved undeveloped reserves over the next five years. At year end the Company’s review of proved undeveloped reserves revealed challenges but the Company maintains its belief that reserves will be developed within five years of their initial recording as a proved undeveloped reserve. In addition, it believes it has the financial wherewithal to develop all its proved undeveloped reserves within the five year time frames required; utilizing its balance sheet, to borrow funds as needed. Additionally, the Company believes it has the ability to joint venture any of its assets.

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves for the periods presented in the financial statements is summarized below.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Future production revenue $20,714,780  $30,085,550 
Future production costs  (6,669,980)  (15,278,990)
Future development costs  (4,973,120)  (4,703,230)
Future cash flows before income tax  9,071,680   10,103,330 
Future income taxes      
Future net cash flows  9,071,680   10,103,330 
10% annual discount for estimating of future cash flows  (7,603,140)  (6,666,300)
Standardized measure of discounted net cash flows $1,468,540  $3,437,030 

Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

The following is a summary of a standardized measure of discounted net future cash flows related to the Company’s proved oil and gas reserves. The information presented is based on a calculation of estimated proved reserves using discounted cash flows based on the 12-month average price for oil and gas calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month prior period. The additions to estimated proved reserves from new discoveries and extensions could vary significantly from year to year. Additionally, the impact of changes to reflect current prices and costs of reserves proved in prior years could also be significant.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Balance beginning of year $3,437,030  $8,769,970 
Sales, net of production costs  34,942   199,531 
Net change in pricing and production costs  16,312,304   (2,012,883)
Net change in future estimated development costs  269,890   (1,198,430)
Purchase of minerals in place      
Extensions and discoveries      
LSA Disposition  (1,902,726)   
Revisions  (17,693,233)  (4,538,173)
Accretion of discount  1,010,333   2,217,015 
Change in income tax      
Balance end of year $1,468,540  $3,437,030 

 F-25