UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORMForm 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year-ended December 31, 2017 

Commission file number 000-30234transition period from _______ to ________

 

 Commission file number: 001-36492

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada88-0422242
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
4040 Broadway8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas
Suite 425��
San Antonio, Texas7820967226
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(210) 451-5545
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (620) 325-6363

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

 

Title of each classEach Class

Trading Symbol(s)Name of each exchangeEach Exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.001 par valueNew York Stock Exchange LLCWhich Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share 

10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value

UAVS
NoneNYSE American LLC

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  ☐  YesNo  ☒   No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ☐  No  ☒

 

☐   Yes           ☒   No

 

Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  ☒  YesNo  ☐   No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  ☒  Yes           ☐   No

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge , in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large“large accelerated filer,accelerated“accelerated filer,“emerging growth company” and smaller“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth companycompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer  ☒Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company 

  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ☐  No  ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.     Yes           ☒   No

 

State theThe aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: approximately $2.0 million.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 23,589,790 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding on March 15, 2018.quarter was $61,203,282.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCEAs of March 31, 2021, there were 62,485,815 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, issued and outstanding.

AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

NONE.

ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC. 

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
PART I 4
ITEM 1.5BUSINESS4
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS16
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS26
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES26
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS26
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES27
ITEM 1BUSINESSPART II 528
ITEM 25.PROPERTIES32
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS17
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS32
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS32
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE32
PART II33
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES3328
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA3429
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS3429
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK4138
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA4138
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE4138
ITEM 9A9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES39
ITEM 9B.41OTHER INFORMATION39
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATIONPART III 4240
PART III43
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE4340
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION4345
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS4351
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE4354
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES4355
PART IV 4456
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTSTATEMENTS, SCHEDULES56
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS44F-1

 


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSPART I

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this document that are not purely historical arereport may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statementsPrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are statements regarding future events, our future financial performance, and include statements regarding projected operating results. Thesecautioned that such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations,our management’s beliefs intentions, strategies, forecasts and assumptions and on information currently available to our management and involve a number of risks and uncertaintiesuncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions, which are subject to change at any time at our discretion. Forward-looking statements include our assessment, from time to time of our competitive position, the industry environment, potential growth opportunities, the effects of regulation and events outside of our control, such as natural disasters, wars or health epidemics. Forward-looking statements include all statements that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipatedare not historical facts and can be identified by these forward-looking statements. We have attempted to identify forward-looking statements by terminology includingterms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “hopes,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts”“predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would” or “should” or the negative of these terms orsimilar expressions.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other comparable terminology. Although we do not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all risk factors nor can we address the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differbe materially different from those contained in any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. AllWe discuss many of these risks in greater detail in “Risk Factors.” Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us onrepresent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K,report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits to the report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any suchthese forward-looking statements except as may otherwise be required by law.

Ourpublicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

Overview

AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (“AgEagle,” “the Company,” “us,” “we,” “our”) produces, supports and operates technologically advanced drone systems and solutions for the fast-emerging unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) industry. We are engaged in delivering the metrics, tools and strategies necessary to invent and implement drone-enabled solutions that solve important problems for our valued customers. With our founding premise rooted in high performance, next-level thinking, and technological innovation, AgEagle is intent on ensuring that standards for quality U.S. manufacturing and the provision of precision-crafted, purpose-built drone systems and solutions are delivered to empower our customers to thrive and prosper in The Drone Age.

Founded in 2010, AgEagle was originally formed to pioneer proprietary, professional-grade, fixed-wing drones and aerial imagery-based data collection and analytics solutions for the agriculture industry. In addition to selling our innovative drones to the precision and sustainable farming markets, AgEagle’s innovative data collection and analytics solutions have processed more than two million acres of crops, analyzing data from over 50 countries and 53 difference crop types, and creating more than 11,000 crop reports for its users. AgEagle remains intent on earning distinction as a trusted partner to clients seeking to adopt and support productive agricultural approaches to improve farming practices which currently limit the impact on our natural resources, reduce reliance on inputs and materially increase crop yields and profits.

In the first half of 2019, the Company introduced HempOverview, a scalable, responsive and cost-effective Software-as-a-Solution (“SaaS”) web- and map-based technology platform to support the operations of domestic industrial hemp programs for state and tribal nation departments of agriculture – a solution that provides users with what the Company believes is the gold standard for regulatory oversight, operational assistance and reporting capabilities for the fast emerging industrial hemp industry.

Over the past decade, the broader drone market has continued to evolve and expand. As a result, economic and productivity benefits made possible by drones is fueling global demand for high quality, safe and reliable drone systems and solutions for commercial applications well beyond agriculture. In response, AgEagle is now leveraging our technological expertise and drone engineering and manufacturing experience to penetrate new, high growth market sectors; namely, drone package delivery, public safety/security, large venue decontamination and infrastructure/inspection, among other high growth market opportunities.

AgEagle’s key growth objectives are centered on three primary areas of certain factors,focus:

1)Ag Solutions: Leveraging our reputation as one of the leading technology solutions providers to the agriculture industry to increase market share through delivery of best-in-class drones, sensors and data analytics for hemp and other commercial crops;
2)Drone Manufacturing: Establishing AgEagle as the dominant commercial drone design, engineering, manufacturing, assembly and testing company in the United States; and
3)Drone Solutions:Establishing the Company as one of the industry’s leading American-made trusted source for turnkey, end-to-end, tailored drone solutions to the world.

We intend to grow our business by preserving a leadership position in our core Ag Solutions business; providing quality contract manufacturing, assembly and testing services; and innovating new customer-focused drone systems and solutions to capture significant share of the broader commercial drone market. In addition, we expect to accelerate our growth and expansion through strategic acquisitions of drone-related companies offering distinct technological and competitive advantages and have defensible IP protection in place, if applicable.

Ag Solutions

According to a report published in August 2020 by industry research firm Markets and Markets (Agriculture Drones Market with COVID-19 Impact Analysis, by Application (Precision Farming, Livestock Monitoring), Offering, Farming Environment, Farm Produce, Component and Geography – Global Forecast to 2025), the agriculture drones market is expected to grow from $1.2 billion in 2020 to $5.7 billion by 2025 at a CAGR of 35.9% over the forecasted period. The report covered drone hardware, software and services and included AgEagle as one of the key market players.

Drone Leasing

In addition to UAV sales, AgEagle also offers a drone leasing program, alleviating farmers and agribusinesses from significant upfront costs associated with purchasing a drone, while also relieving them from ongoing drone maintenance and support requirements. Additionally, the program provides the option of engaging a trained AgEagle pilot to operate the drone and manage the entire image collection process, creating a truly turnkey aerial imagery capture solution for the Company’s customers.

FarmLens Platform

In 2018, we acquired FarmLens, a subscription cloud analytics service that processes data, primarily collected with a drone, such as those produced by AgEagle, and makes such data actionable by farmers and agronomists. Our user-friendly FarmLens solution can easily and quickly stitch virtually thousands of high-resolution, multispectral images together to produce detailed prescription maps for everything from disease and pest infestations to weather impact and improper irrigation – all before these issues can be detected by the naked eye and at materially lower costs than satellite imagery or manned aircraft flyovers.

Used as a PC-based system or on any mobile device, FarmLens helps users save time and eliminates technological hassles and costly computing requirements. The FarmLens platform has benefitted us and our shareholders by allowing us to develop important vertically integrated products and services with our drone-enabled software technologies. FarmLens is currently sold by AgEagle as a subscription service and offered either standalone or in a bundle with drone platforms manufactured by leading drone providers like AgEagle, DJI and senseFly. The FarmLens platform extends AgEagle’s reach as a business through key industry partnerships.

HempOverview Platform

Domestic Hemp Production and Prevailing Regulatory Changes

With the passing of the 2018 Farm Bill in December 2018, industrial hemp is now recognized as an agricultural commodity, such as corn, wheat, or soybeans.

More specifically, the 2018 Farm Bill authorizes state departments of agriculture, including those set forthagencies representing the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and any other territory or possession of the United States, and Indian tribal governments, to submit plans to the USDA applying for primary regulatory authority over the production of hemp in their respective state or tribal territory. For more information on state and tribal nation plan submission, please visit https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/hemp/state-and-tribal-plan-review.

As of February 12, 2021, 23 states and 40 tribal nations have had their hemp production plans approved by the USDA, and 20 states will continue to operate their hemp production plans in accordance with the 2014 pilot guidelines issued by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, which handles the extramural research aspects of industrial hemp cultivation.

Market Opportunity in U.S. Industrial Hemp and Hemp-Derived CBD

After a tumultuous first two years of legal hemp farming in the “Risk Factors” sectionUnited States, many market participants are anticipating that the 2021 planting season will take on a more settled character, bringing some routine and less confusion to growing, harvesting and marketing efforts. In its January 2021 report titled Hemp 2021: Industry Insiders Offer Projections for the Year, Hemp Benchmark noted that some industry leaders believe this year could be a strong one for hemp as the crop becomes more integrated into the workings of America’s agriculture sector.

In its February 2020 market forecast report (https://www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-industrial- hemp-market), Grand View Research stated that the global industrial hemp market will reach $15.26 billion by 2027, up from $5.33 billion in Part I, Item 1A2020. According to the report, an increased focus on selecting low-THC hemp varieties, using developed cultivation and processing equipment, providing technical support for growers, and establishing contracts with farmers, all play significant roles in achieving major market share. Grand View expects that increased awareness of this Annual Reportthe dietary advantages of hemp oil and growing demand for hemp-derived CBD from the cosmetics and personal care industries will help fuel market growth, along with the introduction of conducive regulations for the cultivation and use of hemp-based CBD products in the United States over the forecast period.

HempOverview

As one of the agriculture industry’s leading pioneers of advanced aerial-image-based data collection and analytics solutions, AgEagle is intent on Form 10-Kleveraging our expertise to champion the use of proven, advanced web- and elsewheremap-based technologies as a means to streamline and ultimately standardize hemp cultivation in this document. The factors impacting these risksthe United States. Growers need to be registered/permitted; crops need to be monitored and uncertainties include, but are not limitedinspected; and enforcement operations must be established to ensure compliance with state and federal mandates. Through the introduction of HempOverview, we believe that AgEagle represents the first agriculture technology company to bring to market an advanced agtech solution that is designed to meet the unique complexities and vigorous oversight, compliance and enforcement demands of the emerging American hemp industry and the unique needs and demands of its key stakeholders.

HempOverview is comprised of four modules:

1)Registration: secure, scalable software to handle all farmer and processer application and licensing matters.
2)Best Management Practices: iterative, intelligent data collection and analysis utilizing satellite imagery and advanced, proprietary algorithms to help farmers reduce input costs, avoid missteps, detect pest impacts and monitor water usage.
3)Oversight and Enforcement: integration of data management and satellite imagery to provide continuous monitoring of all hemp fields in the state, predict and respond to issues and assist in proper crop testing.
4)Reporting: generation of actionable reports for USDA requirements, legislative oversight and support of research institutions.

In November 2019, AgEagle announced that the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services chose the HempOverview solution to manage its online application submission and registration process for hemp growers and their farms and hemp fields in the State of Florida for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022. Subsequent to the end of 2020, the Company announced that the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship also licensed the HempOverview platform to manage the state’s online registration, payment processing, comprehensive data collection and compliance oversight for the 2021, 2022 and 2023 planting seasons.

HempOverview has also been created to support hemp processors who contract with growers, helping to ensure profitable production on existing contracted acres while maintaining governmental compliance in a changing regulatory landscape. More specifically, HempOverview supports full, cloud-based mobile- and desktop-based software application and enables users to:

 

 inabilityMaintain oversight of the supply chain for a processor’s contracted acres in order to attract and obtain additional development capital;avoid costly errors resulting in lost crop(s) and/or inefficient production downtime;
 inability to achieve sufficient future sales levels or other operating results;Create metrics and regularly evaluate contracted acres, in near real-time, using a variety of data structures, including remote sensing, in-field monitoring, harvest estimation and comprehensive reporting functions;
 inability to efficiently manage our operations;
effectAdvise contract farmers on planting, fertilization, irrigation and harvest schedules with the goal of our hedging strategies on our results of operations;
potential default under our secured obligations or material debt agreements;
estimated quantities and quality of oil and gas reserves;
declining local, national and worldwide economic conditions;
fluctuations in the price of oil and natural gas;
continued weather conditions that impact our abilities to efficiently manage our drilling and development activities;
the inability of management to effectively implement our strategies and business plans;
approval of certain parts of our operations by state regulators;
inability to hire or retain sufficient qualified operating field personnel;
increases in interest rates or our cost of borrowing;
deterioration in general or regional (Colorado, Western Nebraska, Eastern Kansas and South Texas) economic conditions;
adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs of compliance, or adverse findings byproducing a regulator with respect to existing operations;
the occurrence of natural disasters, unforeseen weather conditions, or other events or circumstances that could impact our operations or could impact the operations of companies or contractors we depend upon in our operations;
inability to acquire mineral leases at a favorable economic value that will allow us to expand our development efforts;“gold standard” hemp crop; and
 changes in U.S. GAAP or in the legal,Establish best practices, maintain compliance and properly file all registration documents and amendments with respective state regulatory and legislative environments in the markets in which we operate.bodies.

 

All referencesHempOverview focuses on simultaneously collecting data, analyzing field-related problems, and providing readily accessible analysis and reporting for achieving and sustaining end-to-end visibility and best management practices for the growing industrial and CBD hemp supply chain.

Drone Manufacturing

Our Proprietary Fixed-Wing Drones

The Company’s first commercially available product was the AgEagle Classic, which was followed shortly thereafter by the RAPID System. As we improved and evolved our product, we launched the RX-60 and subsequently our current UAV product, the RX-48. The success AgEagle has achieved with its legacy products, which the Company believes has carried over into the continued improvement of the RX-60 and RX-48, stems from AgEagle’s ability to invent and deliver advanced solutions utilizing its proprietary technologies and trade secrets that help farmers, agronomists and other precision agricultural professionals operate more effectively and efficiently.

The Company’s core technological capabilities, developed over five years of research and innovation, include a lightweight laminated shell that allows the UAV platform to perform under challenging flying conditions, a camera with a Near Infrared (NIR) filter, a rugged foot launcher (RX-60), and high-end software that automates drone flights and provides geo-referenced data. AgEagle’s products were designed for busy agriculture professionals who do not have the time to process images on their computers, which some of its competitors require. The software can automatically take pictures from the camera, stitch the photos together through the cloud, and deliver a geo-referenced, high quality aerial map to the user’s desktop or tablet device using specialty precision agriculture software such as SST Software, SMS Software or most other agricultural software solutions. The result is a prescription or zone map that can then be used in this reporta field computer that is typically found in a sprayer or applicator designed to “we,” “us,” “our,” “company” and “EnerJex” referdrive through fields to EnerJex Resources, Inc. and our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Working Interest, LLC, and Black Raven Energy, Inc., unlessprecisely apply the context requires otherwise. We report our financial information onamount of nutrients or chemicals required to continue or restore the basisproduction of healthy crops. The Company’s management believes that these characteristics make its UAVs well suited for providing a complete aerial view of a December 31st fiscal year end. We have provided definitions forfarmer’s field to help precisely identify crop health and field conditions faster than any other method available.

Relocation to Wichita

In November 2020, AgEagle relocated its headquarters and drone manufacturing and assembly operations from Neodesha, Kansas to Wichita, Kansas, widely known as the oil and gas industry terms used in this report“Air Capital of the World.” Home to several of the world’s great aviation brands, Wichita was ranked by Brookings Institution (source: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/ uploads/2016/07/Wichita-2.pdf) as having the #1 skilled workforce in the “Glossary” beginning on page 14nation, providing us with direct access to world class engineering and aeronautical talent. In addition, the decision to move to Wichita was further buoyed by the region’s low-cost real estate advantages and high quality of this report.life for our workforce.

 

UnlessOur newly leased 12,000 square foot facility provides AgEagle with ample capacity to materially scale our contract manufacturing business, while also providing the context otherwise requiresspace necessary to house our administrative offices, design and engineering teams and testing operations.

Demand for Drones “Made in America”

For the past several years, security experts have expressed concerns that UAVs made in China or other adversarial countries could be used to spy on U.S. interest by exfiltration of data back to the country of origin. In fact, in May 2019, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security warned in an alert that drones are a potential risk to an organization’s information.

Data released by Drone Industry Insights in late 2019 revealed that China-based Da Jiang Innovations (DJI) accounted for about 70% of all drone sales worldwide – and up to 80% of the U.S. market (Source: https://droneii.com/product/chinese- drone-market-report). Citing the threat of Chinese manufacturers, the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) announced in January 2021 that it will no longer include drones in its suite of offerings as of February 1, 2021 (Source: https://interact.gsa.gov/blog/removal-drones-gsa-multiple-award-schedule-contracts). The Department of Justice also recently banned the use of agency grants to purchase drones and other unmanned aerial systems from foreign groups; and the federal government is not likely to stop these limited policy bans. Congress has already taken steps to check DJI’s ability to operate in the U.S. and it is considering more. It effectively cemented the Defense Department’s ban into law in the National Defense Authorization Act for 2020. Congress has also considered broader bans, such as the draft American Security Drone Act, which would bar any federal agency from acquiring Chinese drones or drones made with Chinese components; and would also codify the different policy prohibitions on using federal grant money to buy Chinese drones and components – an aspect of the law clearly aimed at curbing use of the technology at the state and local levels.

AgEagle believes that these measures to ban China-manufactured drones and components has and will continue to fuel demand for “Made in America” drones and components, creating a significant opportunity for U.S.-based drone manufacturers, like AgEagle. Consequently, it is our intention to establish best industry practices and define quality standards for manufacturing, assembly, design/engineering and testing of drones, drone subcomponents and related drone equipment in our Wichita facility.

We will pursue a lean and efficient production strategy across our business, focusing on rapid prototyping, supply chain management, integration, quality and final acceptance testing. We will work to optimize our own proprietary and customers’ designs to meet scalable manufacturing requirements, mission capabilities and equipment specifications. Within this framework, we expect to develop products with feedback and input from manufacturing, quality, supply chain managers, key suppliers, logistics personnel and our customers. We will incorporate this input into product designs in an effort to maximize efficiencies and quality of our products, while minimizing time to market. As a result, we believe that we will achieve a reduction in time required to move a product from its design phase to full scale production deliveries while achieving high reliability, quality, and safety yields.

It is noteworthy to add that we have forged strong relationships with key suppliers in the U.S. and in U.S.-allied countries based on their ability to meet our needs and delivery timelines. We will continue to expand upon our suppliers’ expertise to improve our existing products and develop new solutions. In 2020, we experienced some supply chain delays due primarily to logistical issues relating to COVID-19 shutdown mandates. Unfortunately, we do anticipate encountering potential delays in 2021.

Contract Manufacturing for Commercial Drone Package Delivery

Over the past year, there has been a surge of prominent companies, including Alphabet (Google), FedEx, Intel, Qualcomm, Amazon, Target, Walmart, Alibaba, UPS, 7-Eleven, Uber and many others, actively developing commercial drone delivery service initiatives as part of their long-term strategic plans. These companies intend to leverage the latest in UAV technologies to deliver food, consumer products, medicines, and other types of lightweight freight direct to consumers and businesses in the fastest, most cost efficient and environmentally responsible manner possible – a practical alternative to costly auto transport. It is believed that AgEagle’s proven expertise in manufacturing rugged, reliable and professional grade UAVs makes the Company a logical partner for designing, manufacturing and testing drone platforms in this fast growing package delivery market.

In 2020, AgEagle’s annual revenue was mostly derived from contracted manufacturing work completed for a major ecommerce company, which engaged the Company to manufacture and assemble UAVs designed to meet the critical specifications for drones that are meant to carry goods in urban and suburban areas along with ground support equipment used for the purposestesting and refining of client��s commercial drone small delivery vehicles, systems and operations currently in development. This customer chose to team with AgEagle due in large measure to our proven expertise in drone design and innovation.

In October 2020, we expanded our contract manufacturing customer base to include Valqari, with which we entered into a two-year agreement, exclusive in North America, to produce Valqari’s patented Drone Delivery Station. This station is the only solution that has solved the “last inch” logistic problems associated with drone deliveries and allows for an entirely automated and safe drone package delivery. We believe that effective solutions for ground support, like Valqari’s Drone Delivery Station, will prove to be a vital, fundamental component of the new drone delivery ecosystem, helping to ensure the promising potential of mainstream drone package delivery is fully realized.

With plans to expand our in-house business development team in 2021, we are actively engaged in identifying and pursuing additional opportunities for AgEagle to develop and strengthen our customer base and/or strategic business partnerships and materially ramp annual revenue generation from our design and engineering, contract manufacturing, assembly and testing services.

Drone Solutions

Market Opportunities

In October 2020, Gartner projected that worldwide shipments of enterprise drones will total 526,000 units, an increase of 50% from 2019. Moreover, the world’s leading research and advisory company also forecasts that global shipments will reach 1.3 million units by 2023. The report, titled Forecast Analysis: IoT Enterprise Drone Shipments, Worldwide,” states, “In the short term, most use cases will be based around surveillance and monitoring due to the technical complexity of other applications. In 2020, the second and third use cases by drone shipments will be fire services monitoring and insurance investigation.” Gartner further believes that adoption of drones in the retail sector for package delivery will rise rapidly after 2023. “The regulatory restrictions and logistical challenges coordinating flight paths, managing airspace over densely populated areas and managing various payloads means that retail, overall, is a longer-term opportunity for drones.” (Source: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-12-04-gartner-forecasts-global-iot-enterprise-drone-shipmen).

Emerging commercial drone markets covered in the Gartner report include:

Insurance InvestigationRail Infrastructure management
Fire Services MonitoringGas (Smart Grid)
Road Toll and Traffic ManagementBuilding Structure Monitoring
Construction MonitoringOutdoor Surveillance
Oil and Gas ExtractionSmart Roads
Retail Fulfillment (Drone Package Delivery)Livestock Management

Precision Crop FarmingAgricultural Equipment Tracking
Airport Drone ManagementMine Operation
Pipeline MonitoringSecurity Guard Equipment
Electricity (Smart Grid)Connected Ship Management
Water (Smart Grid)Port Management
Film, TV and Journalism Drone FilmingElectricity Grid-Scale Generation
Police Evidence Gathering

Drone Industry Insights noted in its June 2020 report, “The Drone Market Size 2020-2025: 5 Key Takeaways,” that the energy sector is the largest industry on the commercial drone market in 2020 and will continue to be so in 2025. However, the transportation and warehousing industry (transportation of packages and passengers, warehousing and storage of goods and support activities related to modes of transportation for inspection and maintenance of infrastructure) will continue to be the fastest growing. While agriculture and construction currently follow energy as the top industries in the drone market, the growth of the transport sector will mean that by 2025, it will be the second largest industry in the market. Looking at the dollars, Drone Industry Insights predicts that the commercial drone solutions market will grow from $22.5 billion in 2020 to $42.8 billion by 2025.

Proprietary, Turnkey, End-to-End Drone Solutions

The use of commercial drones has seen its utility amplified worldwide with the spread of the global COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging applications in drone package delivery, decontamination, infrastructure inspection, security and public safety, insurance and telecommunications have given rise to demand from commercial and industrial enterprises and government agencies for quality, turnkey solutions that tackle and solve specific mission critical challenges. AgEagle believes that we have the necessary industry experience, engineering and manufacturing resources, expertise and skilled workforce to deliver these solutions in a cost-efficient, highly scalable manner. Through purpose-built pilot projects that we are currently leading or may elect to lead or partner on in the near future, we intend to perpetuate our legacy as an industry pioneer; inventing, producing, supporting and commercializing turnkey drone solutions platforms.

BEYOND Program- Integrating UAVs into National Airspace

In November 2020, AgEagle was selected as an industry partner in the next phase of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (US DOT) Unmanned Aircraft System Integration Pilot Program (IPP), known as the BEYOND program. The original IPP was launched through a Presidential Memorandum in October 2017 with nine regional participants. The IPP participants and their industry partners used innovative strategies to craft successful safety cases to operate drones under the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) existing regulations. On October 30, 2020, the US DOT announced that the three-year IPP successfully concluded on October 25, 2020. In the release, U.S. Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios noted, “The IPP propelled the American drone industry forward, allowing for unprecedented expansions in testing and operations through innovative private-public partnerships across the country. Now, the BEYOND program will build upon this report only:     success, tackling the next big challenges facing drone integration.”

Eight of the nine state, local and tribal governments that participated in the original program signed new agreements with the FAA to participate in the BEYOND program, including the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT). AgEagle was selected by KDOT to serve as an industry partner in the BEYOND program to help solve key challenges including:

Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) operations that are repeatable, scalable and economically viable with specific emphasis on infrastructure inspection, public operations and small package delivery;
Leveraging industry operations to better analyze and quantify the societal and economic benefits of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) operations; and
Focusing on community engagement efforts to collect, analyze and address community concerns.

We believe that once the FAA ultimately determines and approves final regulations allowing for integration of commercial UAVs flown beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) into the U.S. airspace, the promising growth of drone delivery solutions is sure to take flight; and there has been positive developments in this regard.

While it is our intention to continue identifying, pursuing and winning contract design, manufacturing, assembly and testing of drone delivery platforms with key industry partners, it is also our intention to design, develop and bring to market our own proprietary, end-to-end drone solutions. Participating in the BEYOND program will empower AgEagle to lead select pilot projects in key areas of interest to us – particularly in drone delivery.

Key Growth Strategies

We intend to grow our business by achieving greater market penetration of the growing precision agriculture marketplace; by promoting our new service targeting the sustainable agriculture marketplace for the 2021 growing season; and by creating new, easier to use and higher value products that position AgEagle as a leading innovator and trusted solutions provider in high growth markets where advanced aerial imaging and data capture and analytics technologies can be used to achieve specific business and sustainability objectives. Currently, our management is actively exploring new vertical expansion opportunities in other industries outside of agriculture and its related areas, including drone-enabled package delivery. In addition to drone package deliveries, we believe that our solutions and services may also be well suited for use in decontamination, mapping and surveying, mining/resource exploration, insurance, inspection and infrastructure/asset inspection, among other industrial applications.

Key components of our growth strategy include the following:

Achieving greater market penetration of the U.S. industrial hemp industry by working to establish HempOverview and other related products and services as the gold industry standard for hemp cultivation oversight, compliance, enforcement and commerce. AgEagle is – and intends to remain – at the leading edge of leveraging best-in-class technology to provide turnkey solutions for state and tribal regulatory departments of agriculture, industrial hemp and hemp-derived CBD growers and processors. Currently, AgEagle believes that it is the only company in the nation with extensive experience in agriculture that is effectively addressing the emerging needs and challenges of the domestic hemp cultivation industry through the application of advanced technology – a key competitive differential that the Company hopes to continue capitalizing on in the coming year.  
Deliver new and innovative solutions. AgEagle’s research and development efforts are the foundation of the Company, and we intend to continue investing in our own innovations, pioneering new and enhanced products and solutions that enable us to satisfy the Company’s customers – both in response to and in anticipation of their needs. AgEagle believes that by investing in research and development, the Company can be a leader in delivering innovative drone systems and solutions that address market needs within our current target markets, enabling us to create new opportunities for growth.
Continue to expand the AgEagle platform of drone systems and solutions into other industries beyond agriculture and commercial package delivery. The Company is actively pursuing opportunities outside of agriculture as we continue to expand and grow the AgEagle platform. We are confident in the UAV systems, services and solutions we offer today and believe that these systems, services and solutions could provide other drone industry sectors the same kind of optimization we are currently providing the agriculture industry. Expansion initiatives include the provision of quality contract manufacturing, design and engineering, assembly and testing of advanced drones and drone-related equipment, as well as turnkey drone solutions for the broader drone market.
Growth through acquisition. Through successful execution of our growth-through-acquisition strategies, we intend to acquire technologically advanced drone-related companies and intellectual property that complement and strengthen our value proposition to the market. We believe that by investing in complementary acquisitions, we can accelerate our revenue growth and deliver a broader array of innovative drone systems and solutions that address specialized market needs within our current target markets and in emerging drone industry sectors.

Competitive Strengths

AgEagle believes the following attributes and capabilities provide us with long-term competitive advantages:

Proprietary technologies, in-house capabilities and industry experience - We believe our decade of experience in commercial drone design and engineering; in-house manufacturing, assembly and testing capabilities; and advanced technology development skillset serve to differentiate AgEagle in the marketplace. As of today, we develop and manufacture all the drone systems and solutions we produce in the United States, which allows us to avoid many of the potential difficulties that could arise if our engineering and manufacturing operations were otherwise located outside of the country. In addition, AgEagle is committed to meeting and exceeding quality and safety standards for manufacturing, assembly, design and engineering and testing of drones, drone subcomponents and related drone equipment in our Wichita-based manufacturing operations.
Advanced technology solutions allow users to remove the guesswork in effectively managing hemp cultivation oversight, compliance, enforcement, reporting and commerce - To our knowledge, there is no other SaaS solution available on the market today – particularly one that has been developed by a proven Agtech company with the level of experience and expertise of AgEagle – that provides the multi-faceted level of support and services that HempOverview offers to all stakeholders in the industry.
Increased margins for farmers - We believe our drones and drone solutions directly enhance margins for commercial farmers by reducing the amount of nutrients and chemicals needed to manage their farms. The software equipped on our UAVs deliver a high-quality aerial map upon completion of the flight, allowing the user to accurately identify the specific areas that are malnourished. This software is compatible with precision applicator tractors, which assist users in applying a precise amount of nutrients in only the areas it is needed. In addition, Our UAVs are specially designed to provide users with a portable and easy to operate device, which can be controlled with a hand-held unit or tablet. Through our FarmLens platform, users are able to plan and track an efficient flight path for their UAV. The UAVs are equipped with a camera and NIR filter whose images provide a holistic aerial view of the fields, along with meaningful data that is uploaded and delivered to the user within a very short time frame. As a result, this platform allows users to quickly detect any issues in their crops, which enables them to address such issues in a timely manner before any damage, or further damage, may affect their crops.

 

“Exchange Act” refersExpertise in drone delivery – Since 2019, AgEagle has been actively engaged in the custom manufacturing and assembly of drones and drone equipment used for the testing and refining of a world leading ecommerce company’s commercial drone small package delivery vehicles, systems and operations. As a result, we are uniquely positioned to the Securities Exchange Actcollaborate with other organizations seeking to activate and accelerate adoption of 1934, as amended;end-to-end drone delivery solutions to drive new and differentiated value creation in their business-to-business or business-to-consumer operations.

“SEC” orLeading-edge research and delivery – In order to propel functional commercial applications of drone solutions in real world, real-time environments, and to best aid in the “Commission” refersdetermination and ultimate adoption of a regulatory framework to guide and direct mainstream commercial use of drones beyond visual line of sight, AgEagle is a lead participant in the United States SecuritiesFAA’s BEYOND program in Kansas and Exchange Commission; and

“Securities Act” refers to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.is actively engaged in partnering with other leading drone solutions companies on pilot projects with long-term commercial potential.

 

Government Regulation

UAV Regulation

AVAILABLE INFORMATIONAgEagle’s proprietary drones are subject to regulations of the FAA. On June 21, 2016, the FAA announced it had finalized the first operational rules for routine commercial use of small UAS, which for purposes of the regulations are unmanned aircraft weighing less than 55 pounds that are conducting non-hobbyist operations. UAS operators-for-hire will have to pass a written test and be vetted by the TSA, but no longer need to be airplane pilots as current law requires. The rules went into effect on August 20, 2016. For additional insight into these initial regulations created for commercial UAS operations, please see https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=20515.

 

We file annual, quarterlyRecent Regulatory Updates

In September 2020, the FAA announced its policy for the type certification of certain UAS as a special class of aircraft. The 14 CFR part 21 rule contains the FAA’s procedural requirements for airworthiness and type certification for small drones. The new policy is directed towards UAS operations currently not covered by the existing Part 107 rule, for example beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) and flights over people. For details regarding the new policy, please go to https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/09/18/2020-17882/type-certification-of-certain-unmanned-aircraft-systems.

On December 28, 2020, the FAA announced final rules for drones that will require Remote Identification (Remote ID) of drones and allow operators of small drones to fly over people and at night under certain conditions. In the related press release (https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=25541), U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao stated, “These final rules carefully address safety, security and privacy concerns while advancing opportunities for innovation and utilization of drone technology.”

The Remote ID rule applies to all operators of drones that require FAA registration. There are three ways to comply with the operational requirements:

1.Operate a standard Remote ID drone that broadcasts identification and location information of the drone and control station;
2.Operate a drone with a Remote ID broadcast module (may be a separate device attached to the drone), which broadcasts identification, location, and take-off information; or
3.Operate a drone without Remote ID but at specific FAA-recognized identification areas.

The Operations Over People and at Night rule applies to Part 107 operators. The ability to fly over people and moving vehicles varies depending on the level of risk a small drone operation presents to people on the ground. Operations are permitted based on four categories, which can be found in the executive summary accompanying the rule. Additionally, this rule allows for operations at night under certain conditions. For additional information regarding these and other reportsFAA rules relating to UAS operations, please visit www.faa.gov.

Domestic Hemp Cultivation Regulation

The 2018 Farm Bill directed the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) to establish a national regulatory framework for hemp production in the United States. The USDA established the U.S. Domestic Hemp Production Program through an interim final rule outlining provisions for the USDA to approve plans submitted by States and other information withIndian Tribes for the SEC. You can read these SEC filings and reports over the Internet at the SEC’s website atwww.sec.govdomestic production of hemp. It also established a Federal plan for producers in States or on our website atwww.enerjex.com. You can also obtain copiesterritories of the documents at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330Indian tribes that do not have their own USDA-approved plan. The program includes provisions for furthermaintaining information on the operationsland where hemp is produced, testing the levels of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol, disposing of plants not meeting necessary requirements, licensing requirements and ensuring compliance with the requirements of the public reference facilities. We will provide a copy of our annual report to security holders, including audited financial statements, at no charge upon receipt to of a written request to us at EnerJex Resources, Inc., 4040 Broadway, Suite 425, San Antonio, Texas 78209.Rule. For more information on state and tribal nation plan submission, please visit https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/hemp/state-and-tribal-plan-review.

 


As of February 12, 2021, 23 states and 40 tribal nations have had their hemp production plans approved by the USDA, and 20 states will continue to operate their hemp production plans in accordance with the 2014 pilot guidelines issued by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, which handles the extramural research aspects of industrial hemp cultivation.

AgEagle has developed HempOverview to provide users with a gold industry standard for fully complying with federal, state and tribal regulations associated with hemp cultivation.

Manufacturing

As of today, we manufacture and assemble all our proprietary and customers’ drone systems and solutions at our manufacturing facility in Wichita, Kansas.

Suppliers

In 2020, we maintained strong relationships established with companies that provide many of the parts and services necessary to construct our advanced fixed wing drones, such as Botlink and MicaSense. INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATAOn January 26, 2021, , the Company and AgEagle Sensor Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Buyer”), entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “MicaSense Purchase Agreement”) with Parrot Drones S.A.S. and Justin B. McAllister (the “Sellers”) pursuant to which the Buyer agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of MicaSense, Inc. (“MicaSense”) from the Sellers. The transaction closed on January 27, 2021. MicaSense manufactures and sells drone sensors for vegetation mapping and other drone applications. As our Company grows, we expect to pursue additional supplier relationships from which we can source less costly and better supplies to stay ahead of the needs of the market.

Our flight planning and photo stitching software is provided by Pix4D and flight planning is QGroundControl, an open-source application. We have worked closely with software partners to optimize their software to work with our platform. We consider our relationships with Pix4D to be good; however, a loss of this relationship would have a short-term adverse effect on our product offerings and results of operations, as we look to an alternative provider for our photo stitching software.

Revenue Mix

 

The market data and certain other statistical information used throughout this report are based on independent industry publications, government publications, reportstable below reflects our revenue for the years indicated by market research firms or other published independent sources. In addition, some data are based on our good faith estimates.product mix:

 

  For the Year Ended December 31,
Type 2020 2019
Drone and Custom Manufacturing Sales $1,218,735  $267,622 
Software Subscription Sales  66,648   29,055 
Total $1,285,383  $296,677 

 

PART IResearch and Development

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESSResearch and development activities are part of our business and we follow a disciplined approach to investing our resources to create new drone technologies and solutions. A fundamental part of this approach is a well-defined screening process that helps us identify commercial opportunities that support current desired technological capabilities in the markets we serve. Our research includes the expansion of our wing products, providing for developing a portfolio of UAVs, ongoing software development, as well as other technological solutions to problems to which our existing and prospective customers must confront.

 

Company HistoryRisks Relating to Our Business

 

We were formerly known as Millennium Plastics CorporationOur business is subject to numerous risks and were incorporateduncertainties, including those highlighted in the Statesection titled “Risk Factors” found in Item 1A within this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of Nevadathese risks include, but are not limited to, risks associated with:

our need for additional funding;
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights;
rapid technological changes in the industry;
governmental policies and regulations regarding the industries in which we operate;
our ability to maintain strong relationships with our customers, suppliers and distributors; and
worldwide and domestic economic trends and financial market conditions, including an economic decline in the agricultural industry.

Recent Developments

MicaSense Acquisition

On January 26, 2021, the Company entered into the MicaSense Purchase Agreement, whereby the Buyer agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of MicaSense from the Sellers. The transaction closed on January 27, 2021. MicaSense manufactures and sells drone sensors for vegetation mapping and other drone applications. The aggregate purchase price for the shares of MicaSense is $23,000,000, less the amount of MicaSense’s debt and subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The consideration is also subject to a $4,750,000 holdback to cover any post-closing indemnification claims and to satisfy any purchase price adjustments. The holdback is scheduled to be released in two equal installments, less any amounts paid or reserved for outstanding indemnity claims, on March 31, 1999. We abandoned2022 and March 31, 2023 in accordance with the terms of the MicaSense Purchase Agreement.

A portion of the consideration is comprised of shares of Common Stock of the Company, par value $0.001Common Stock, having an aggregate value of $3,000,000 based on a volume weighted average trading price of the Common Stock over a ten consecutive trading day period prior to the date of issuance of the shares of Common Stock to the Sellers (the “Shares”). The Shares are issuable 90 days after the closing date of the transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the MicaSense Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2021, and a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2021, the Company has agreed to file a Form S-3 Registration Statement (the “Registration Statement”) covering the resale of the Shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) no later than ten days following the date the Shares are issued to the Sellers. The Company shall use its best efforts to cause the Registration Statement to be declared effective as soon as possible after the filing date, but in any event no later than 90 days after the filing date, and shall use its best efforts to keep the Registration Statement effective and in compliance with the provisions of the Securities Act (including by preparing and filing with the SEC such amendments, including post-effective amendments, and supplements to the Registration Statement and the prospectus used in connection therewith as may be necessary) until all Shares and other securities covered by such Registration Statement have been disposed of. The Sellers are required to reimburse the Company up to $50,000 for reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by the Company in connection with such registration.

The MicaSense Purchase Agreement contains certain customary representations, warranties and covenants, including representations and warranties by the Sellers with respect to MicaSense’s business, plan focusingoperations and financial condition. The MicaSense Purchase Agreement also includes post-closing covenants relating to the confidentiality and employee non-solicitation obligations of the Sellers, and the agreement of the Sellers not to compete with certain aspects of the business of MicaSense following the closing of the transaction. The completion of the transactions contemplated by the MicaSense Purchase Agreement is subject to customary closing conditions, including, among others: (i) the absence of a material adverse effect on MicaSense, (ii) the developmentdelivery by the parties of biodegradable plastic materials. In August 2006, we acquired Midwest Energy,certain ancillary documents, including the Registration Rights Agreement, and (iii) the execution by a key employee of MicaSense of an employment agreement. Subject to certain limitations, each of the parties will be indemnified for damages resulting from third party claims and breaches of the parties’ respective representations, warranties, and covenants in the MicaSense Purchase Agreement.

Organizational History

On March 26, 2018, our predecessor company, EnerJex Resources, Inc. (“EnerJex”), a Nevada company, consummated the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated October 19, 2017, pursuant to which AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation pursuant to a reverse merger. After the merger, Midwest Energy becameand a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex, merged with and into AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., a privately held company organized under the laws of the state of Nevada (“AgEagle Sub”), with AgEagle Sub surviving as a resultwholly-owned subsidiary of the merger, the former Midwest Energy stockholders controlled approximately 98% of our outstanding shares of common stock. We changed our name to EnerJex Resources, Inc., in(the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger, EnerJex changed its name to AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (the “Company, “we,” “our,” or “us”) and AgEagle Sub changed its name initially to “Eagle Aerial, Inc. and then to” AgEagle Aerial, Inc. Prior to this merger and in November 2007 we changedall of the name of Midwest Energy (now our wholly-owned subsidiary) to EnerJex Kansas, Inc. (“EnerJex Kansas”). All of our current operations arewere conducted through EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Black Sable”) and Black Raven Energy, Inc. a Nevada corporation (“Black Raven”). OurIts leasehold interests arewere held in ourits wholly-owned subsidiaries Black Sable, Working Interest, LLC, (“Working Interest”) EnerJex Kansas and Black Raven. As of December 31, 2020, the Company continues with the wholly-owned subsidiaries AgEagle Aerial, Inc. and Enerjex Kansas, Inc.

 

LiquidityOur Headquarters

Our principal executive offices are located at 8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas 67226 and Ability to Continueour telephone number is 620-325-6363. Our website address is www.ageagle.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of this Annual Report. We have included our website address in this Annual Report solely as a Going Concernan inactive textual reference.

Employees

 

As discussed under “Item 9B — Other Information”of December 31, 2020, we employed 10 full-time and 1 part-time employees.

Intellectual Property

We currently have registered trademarks on the continued low oilAgEagle,FarmLens and natural gas prices during 2016The Drone Age names. In 2021, we plan to apply for registered trademark protection on the AgEagle revised logo and 2017 have had a significant adverse impactto file provisional patents on our business, and, as a resultcertain aspects of our financial condition, substantial doubt exists that we willcurrent and future technology. We consider our UAV manufacturing process to be ablea trade secret and have non-disclosure agreements with current employees to continue as a going concern.protect those and other trade secrets held by the Company.

 

On October 19, 2017, EnerJex entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”), which designs, develops, produces, and distributes technologically advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV or drones) that are supplied to the agriculture industry, and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into AgEagle, Merger Sub will cease to exist and AgEagle will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). The respective boards of directors of EnerJex and AgEagle have approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), the shares of AgEagle capital stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive 85% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on a fully-diluted basis. In addition, at the Effective Time all outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle common stock will be assumed by the Company and converted into options and warrants to purchase shares of Company common stock. No fractional shares of Company common stock will be issued in the Merger but will be rounded to the nearest whole share. Following the consummation of the Merger, former stockholders of AgEagle with respect to the Merger are expected to own 85% of the Company’s outstanding common stock (inclusive of the AgEagle assumed stock options and warrants), and current common and Series A Preferred stockholders of the Company are expected to own 15% of the Company, excluding shares of common stock that may be issued in connection with the conversion of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, and not including any additional shares which may be issued in connection with the Company’s closing obligation to provide up to $4 million in new working capital and the elimination of all liabilities currently on the Company’s balance sheet.

In connection with the Merger, the Company agreed to file a proxy statement seeking stockholder approval (which proxy was filed as part of the Form S-4 Registration Statement filed by the Company which has become effective to date) to: (a) amend the terms of its Series A Preferred Stock (as discussed below); (b) approve the issuance of the Company’s shares in connection with the Merger to the AgEagle shareholders and new investors, in excess of 19.9% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (c) approve the issuance of shares to current Company management and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnity obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (d) change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Resources, Inc.” 

The Merger Agreement provides that, immediately following the Effective Time, the existing board of directors and officers of the Company will resign and new directors and officers will be appointed by AgEagle.Where You Can Find Additional Information

 

The Company intends to dispose of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties, concurrently with the closing of the Merger. In the event the Merger is not consummated, the Company does not have a present intention to dispose of the above described assets.


The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the stockholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligationsreporting requirements under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the stockholders of theExchange Act. The Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x)files with, or furnishes to, the AgEagle stockholders in connection with the MergerSEC quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listingamendments to those reports and will furnish its proxy statement. These filings are available free of shares ofcharge on the Company’s common stockwebsite, wwwageagle.com, shortly after they are filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet website, www.sec.gov, which contains reports and information statements and other information regarding issuers.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

The risk factors discussed below could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Although we have attempted to list comprehensively these important factors, we caution you that other factors may in the future prove to be issuedimportant in affecting our results of operations. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors, nor can we assess the Merger and other related transactionsimpact of each such factor on the NYSE American; and (e) that all ofbusiness or the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants obligating each of the Company and AgEagle to continue to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course, to provide reasonable access to each other’s information and to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate and coordinate to make any filings or submissions that are required to be made under any applicable laws or requested to be made by any government authority in connection with the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contains a customary “no solicitation” provision pursuantextent to which any factor, or the completion or terminationcombination of the Merger, neither the Company nor AgEaglefactors, may solicit or engagecause actual results to differ materially from those contained in discussions with any third party regarding another acquisition proposal unless, in the Company’s case, it has received an unsolicited, bona fide written proposal that the recipient’s board of directors determines is or would reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal. The Company has paid AgEagle a $50,000 non-refundable fee at the signing of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights in favor of each of the Company and AgEagle.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for indemnification in the event of any damages suffered by either party as a result of breaches of representations and warranties contained therein. The aggregate maximum indemnification obligation of any indemnifying party for damages with respect to breaches of representations and warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement shall not exceed, in the aggregate, $350,000, other than for fraud, intentional misrepresentation or willful breach. An indemnifying party shall satisfy its indemnification obligations with shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the aggregate amount of losses of the indemnified party, calculated based upon the greater of (i) the value of the Company common stock as of the closing of the Merger; and (ii) the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE American for the five trading days immediately prior to the date such a claim is made. The Company has agreed to deposit an aggregate of 1,215,278 shares of common stock to be issued to current officers and directors of the Company in lieu of deferred salary and fees into escrow to secure its indemnification obligations, the issuance of such shares requiring the approval of the Company’s common stockholders.

On October 19, 2017, concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, a principal stockholder of AgEagle (the “Key AgEagle Stockholder”) entered into a voting agreement in favor of EnerJex (the “EnerJex Voting Agreement”). Pursuant to the EnerJex Voting Agreement, the Key AgEagle Stockholder has agreed, among other things, to vote all shares of capital stock of AgEagle beneficially owned by him in favor of the Merger and the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the approval of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and any actions required in furtherance thereof. The AgEagle Voting Agreement will terminate upon the earliest to occur of: (i) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms; or (ii) the date on which the Merger becomes effective.

In connection with, and as a condition to the closing of the Merger, the Company is seeking the consent of the holder of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) to amend the terms thereof to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, and (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of Company common stock. An affirmative vote of 66.7% of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock voting as a class as of the record date of the proxy statement is required to amend the terms of the Certificate of Designation to provide for these changes, as required under the Merger Agreement. As of September 30, 2017, the Series A Preferred Stock had accrued a total of $6,039,972 in accrued but unpaid dividends, which would result in an additional 241,599 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued by the Company to satisfy these accrued dividends.forward-looking statement.

 

The Merger Agreement provides either partyrisks described below set forth what we believe to be the rightmost material risks associated with the purchase of our Common Stock. Before you invest in our Common Stock, you should carefully consider these risk factors, as well as the other information contained in this prospectus.

Risks Related to terminateOur Business and the Merger ifIndustries We Serve

We operate in evolving markets, which makes it has not been consummated by January 31, 2018, provided that if alldifficult to evaluate our business and future prospects.

AgEagle’s drone systems and solutions are and will be sold in new and rapidly evolving markets. The commercial UAV industry is in the early stages of customer adoption and the conditionsFAA’s definition of regulations relating to closing shall have been satisfied or shall be capablethe integration of being satisfied at such time,commercial drones into the required closing dateU.S. airspace is still ill-defined but advancing. Accordingly, our business and future prospects may be extended until March 31, 2018. On January 31, 2018,difficult to evaluate. We cannot accurately predict the Company extended the required closing date with AgEagle to March 31, 2018.

More information regarding AgEagle, its business operations, financial results and risk factors relating thereto, is described in greater detail in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on October 20, 2017.

On November 21, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) signed a binding commitment letter with the Company to provide prior to or at the closing of the Merger, a minimum of $4 million in new equity capital at a pre-money valuation of between $16 million and $25 million (the “Private Placement”). Per the terms of this commitment letter, in the event any unaffiliated third parties of EnerJex participate in the Private Placement, Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall be reduced by such aggregate gross dollar amount funded by such unaffiliated third parties. Alpha has also agreed to convert all notes they hold from the Company into equity at the closing of the Merger. For their funding commitment, Alpha will receive a fee equal to 2.5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis payable at the closing of the Merger. Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall terminate on the earlier to occur of (i) the consummation of the Merger, and (ii) March 31, 2018. The Company further agreed that, at no time from the date hereof until the consummation of the Merger, shall it provide or disclose to Alpha any “material non-public information” regarding itself, without the prior consent of Alpha. The funding of the Private Placement is subject to standard conditions such as accuracy of representations and warranties provided in the Merger Agreement, and other similar conditions.

At a special meeting of shareholders held on March 21, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved (a) the issuance of the Company’s common stock to the shareholders of AgEagle in connection with and pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement in accordance with NYSE American Rules 712 and 713; (b) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to amend the 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment for a reverse stock split (discussed below)), and (iv) increase the number of Series A Preferred shares by 241,599 shares; (c) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.”; (d) the adoption of the EnerJex 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); (e) the issuance of 2,248,264 shares of common stock to current officers and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s obligations under the Merger Agreement; (f) the conversion of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (g) the conversion of the Company’s 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (h) the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, conversion of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock and conversion of $425,000 owed under five promissory notes held by, Alpha Capital Anstalt, of which $200,000 of the notes have previously been converted into Series C Preferred Stock as of the date of this filing, into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American. 


The Plan provides for the grant of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock (such number based on a post-reverse split amount) as awards which may include incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), unrestricted shares, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, SARs, tandem stock appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, or any combination of the foregoing, to key management employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (however, solely Company employees or employees of the Company’s subsidiaries are eligible for incentive stock option awards).

Additionally, the Company plans to conduct a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was approved by Company shareholders on April 27, 2017, prior to the closing of the Merger, which the Company anticipates occurring prior to March 31, 2018.

In addition, as discussed below under “Significant Developments in 2017” the Company’s lender sold our loan on May 10, 2017.  

Significant Developments in 2017

The following briefly describes our most significant corporate developments occurring in 2017:

On February 10, 2017, the Company, Texas Capital Bank (“TCB”) and IberiaBank (collectively, “Sellers”), and PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, and certain financial institutions (collectively, “Buyers”) entered into a Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”), pursuantextent to which Sellers solddemand for our drone systems and solutions will increase, if at all. The challenges, risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by companies in rapidly evolving markets could impact our ability to Buyers, and Buyers purchased from Sellers, all of Sellers’ right, title and interest in, to and underdo the October 2011 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and related loan documents associated therewith, in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $5,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price”), (ii) a Synthetic Equity Interest equal to 10% of the proceeds, after Buyer’s realization of a 150% return on the Cash Purchase Price within five (5) years of the closing date of the sale, with payment being distributed 65.78947368% to TCB and 34.21052632% to IberiaBank, and (iii) at any time prior to February 10, 2022, Buyer may acquire the interest in clause (ii) above. In connection with the LSA, the Company released Sellers and its successors as holders of the rights under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, including Buyers, from any and all claims under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents. 

Also on February 10, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries, and successor lender entered into a binding letter agreement dated February 10, 2017, which was subsequently amended on March 30, 2017 (as amended, the “letter agreement”) pursuant to which:following:

 

1.the successor lender agreedGenerate sufficient revenue to forgive our existing secured loan in the approximate principal amount of $17,295,000, and in exchange entered into a secured promissory note (which we refer to as the “restated secured note”) in the original principal amount of $4,500,000.achieve sustainable profitability;
   
2.we:Acquire and maintain market share;
   
a.conveyedAchieve or manage growth in our oil and gas properties and associated performance and surety bonds in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska;business operations;
   
b.conveyed all of our shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (together, the “conveyed oil and gas assets”); andRenew contracts;
   
c.retained our assets in KansasAttract and continued as a going concern. The Kansas assets currently provide most of our current operating revenue.

The restated secured note:

a.is secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s oilretain software and gas producing assets situated in the State of Kansas,system engineers and other highly qualified personnel;
   
b.evidences accrued interest on the $4,500,000 principal balance at a rate of 16% per annum,Successfully develop and commercial market new products and end-to-end solutions;
   
c.bears interest fromAdapt to new or changing polices and after May 1, 2017, at a ratespending priorities of 16.0% per annum,

d.is pre-payable in full at a discount at any time during the term of the restated secured note upon the Company paying $3,300,000 to successor lender,prospective clients; and
   
e.maturesAccess additional capital when required and is due and payable in full on November 1, 2017 (subject to the extensions described below).reasonable terms.

 

The Company has extended the restated secured noteIf we fail to March 23, 2018. We have an option to extend the maturity dateaddress these and other challenges, risks and uncertainties successfully, our business, results of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.operations and financial condition would be materially harmed.

 

So long asWe have a history of operating losses and expect to incur significant additional operating expenses.

Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, AgEagle Aerial, Inc., we repayhave been operating for approximately ten years. However, AgEagle Aerial, Inc. has only been in the $3,300,000UAV business for half of that time and just begun to operate in indebtedness on or prior to the maturity date, as extended, all other amounts payable underhemp industry. We are currently in the restated secured note are to be forgiven.

The closing occurred on May 10, 2017. As partbusiness development stage and have limited commercial sales of our products and, accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will become profitable. Moreover, even if we achieve profitability, given the competitive and evolving nature of the closing proceduresindustries in which we operate, we may be unable to sustain or increase profitability and net settlement, we issued a promissory notefailure to Pass Creek Resources LLC in the amount of $105,806. The promissory bears interest at 16% per annum and matured on June 9, 2017. The amount due was not paid on June 9, 2017, but the holder has not provided the Company a notice of default.


In connection with the May 10, 2017 closing and in consideration of the satisfaction of $13,425,000 of the amount due under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company and certain ofdo so would adversely affect its subsidiaries transferredbusiness, including our ability to PCR Holdings LLC, an affiliate of the successor lenders under the Credit Agreement, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties and assets located in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska, as well as the Company’s shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.raise additional funds.

 

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above. 

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees its subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement,We will need additional funding and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil propertiesunable to raise capital when needed, which would force us to delay, curtail or assets.

On April 27, 2017, the Company entered into a Services Agreement (“Service Agreement”) with Camber Energy, Inc., to perform certain outsourced interim services for $150,000 per month. Effective December 4, 2017, the Company and Camber Energy, Inc. (“Camber”), mutually agreed to terminate the agreement between the parties effective November 30, 2017.

On December 20, 2017, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement for the sale of 1,061,750 shares of its Series A 10% Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”). The Preferred Stock was sold toeliminate one investor at $0.612 per share or the aggregate of $649,791. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the sale of the Preferred Stock to satisfy certain closing conditions of the Merger.

On December 22, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Date of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provides notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of the First Amendment, the Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have the option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

Our Business

Our principal strategy, other than completing the Merger as described above, is to acquire, develop, explore and produce domestic onshore oil and natural gas properties. Our business activities are currently focused in Kansas.

Our total net proved oil and gas reserves as of December 31, 2017 were 0.5 million barrels of oil equivalents (BOE), of which 100% was oil. Of the 0.5 million BOE of total proved reserves, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped.

The total PV10 (present value)more of our proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 was approximately $1.5 million. “PV10” means the estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated productionresearch and future development and abandonment costs after giving consideration of salvage value there were no material abandonment costs included in future development costs, using prices and costs in effect at the determination date, before income taxes, and without giving effect to non-property related expenses, discounted to a present value using an annual discount rate of 10% in accordance with the guidelines of the SEC. PV10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Reserves” page 36, for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.

Except where noted, the discussion regarding our business in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is as of December 31, 2017.


Our Kansas Properties

The table below summarizes our current Kansas acreage by project name as of December 31, 2017.

Project Name Developed Acreage(1)  Undeveloped Acreage  Total Acreage 
  Gross  Net(2)  Gross  Net (2)  Gross  Net(2) 
Mississippian Project  4,365   3,492         4,365   3,492 
Other  584   146         584   146 
Total  4,949   3,638         4,949   3,638 

(1)Developed acreage includes all acreage that was held by production as of December 31, 2017.
(2)Net acreage is based on our net working interest as of December 31, 2017.

Mississippian Projectprograms or commercialization efforts.

 

Our Mississippian Project is located in Woodsonoperations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. We expect to continue to spend substantial amounts on product and Greenwood Counties in Southeast Kansas, where we own a 90% working interest in 4,949 gross acres. Approximately 73.5%software development. We will require additional funds to support our continued research and development activities, as well as the costs of the gross leased acres in this project are currently held-by-production.commercializing, marketing and selling any new products and/or services resulting from those activities.

 

AsUntil such time, if ever, that we can generate sufficient revenue and achieve profitability, we expect to seek to finance future cash needs through equity or debt financings or corporate collaborations and/or strategic arrangements. We currently have no other commitments or agreements relating to any of December 31, 2017,these types of transactions and cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital, we may have to delay, curtail or eliminate commercializing, marketing and selling one or more of our Mississippian Project was producing approximately 100 gross barrels of oil per day from the Mississippian formation at a depth of approximately 1,700 feet. solutions.

 

Our Business StrategyProduct development is a long, expensive and uncertain process.

 

SinceThe development of both UAV software and hardware is a costly, complex and time-consuming process, and investments in product development often involve a long wait until a return, if any, can be achieved on such investment. We might face difficulties or delays in the execution ofdevelopment process that will result in our inability to timely offer products that satisfy the merger agreement on October 19, 2017, our primary business strategy has focused on achievingmarket, which might allow competing products to emerge during the requirements necessary to consummate the merger.development and certification process. We continue to move forward with this strategy with an anticipated closing prior to March 31, 2018. Prioranticipate making significant investments in research and development relating to our pending merger,products and services, but such investments are inherently speculative and require substantial capital expenditures. Any unforeseen technical obstacles and challenges that we encounter in the research and development process could result in delays in or the abandonment of product commercialization, may substantially increase development costs, and may negatively affect our principal strategy focused on theresults of operations.

Successful technical development of oil and gas properties thatour products does not guarantee successful commercialization.

Although we have low production decline rates and offer drilling opportunities with low risk profiles. Our oil and gas operations are in Kansas. The principal elementssuccessfully completed the technical development of our business strategy were:two original UAV systems, as well as the RX-60 and RX-48 systems, and have developed or acquired several software platforms which we offer for sale or subscription, we may still fail to achieve commercial success for several reasons, including, among others, the following:

 

 Develop Our Existing Properties.  Creating production, cash flow, and reserve growth by developing our inventory of hundreds of drilling locations that we have identified on our existing properties.
Maximize Operational Control.  We seekfailure to operate and maintain a substantial working interest inobtain the majority of our properties. We believe the ability to control our drilling inventory will provide us with the opportunity to more efficiently allocate capital, manage resources, control operating and development costs, and utilize our experience and knowledge of oil and gas field technologies.
Reduce Unit Costs Through Economies of Scale and Efficient Operations.   As we increase our oil and gas production and develop our existing properties, we expect that our unit cost structure will benefit from economies of scale. In particular, we anticipate reducing unit costs by greater utilization of our existing infrastructure over a larger number of wells.

Our future financial results will continue to depend on:

the market pricerequired regulatory approvals for oil, gas and natural gas liquids;their use;
   
 our ability to preserve sufficient working capital and maintain access to capital resources;
our ability to cost effectively manage our operations;
our ability to source and evaluate potential projects;
our ability to discover and exploit commercial quantities of oil and gas; and

our ability to implement development program.

We cannot guarantee that we will succeed in any of these respects. Further, we cannot know if the price of crude oil and natural gas prevailing at the time of production will be at a level allowing for profitable production, or that we will be able to obtain additional funding at terms favorable to us to increase our capital resources. A detailed description of these and other risks that could materially impact our actual results is in “Risk Factors” under ITEM 1A.

In the event the merger is not consummated, our intent is to refocus on the development of oil and gas properties as set forth above. 

Drilling Activity

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had no drilling activity.

Net Production, Average Sales Price and Average Production and Lifting Costs

The table below sets forth our net oil and gas production (net of all royalties, overriding royalties and production due to others) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the average sales prices, average production costs and direct lifting costs per unit of production.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Net Production        
Crude oil (bbl)  31,834   58,123 
Natural gas liquids (bbl)  75   530 
Natural gas (mcf)  11,649   47,554 
         
Average Sales Prices        
Crude oil ($ per bbl)  41.04   40.75 
Natural gas liquids ($ per bbl)  12.70   7.02 
Natural gas (per $ mcf)  1.67   1.51 
         
Average Production Cost(1)  $  per BOE  39.26   43.79 
Average Lifting Costs(2) $ per BOE  40.29   39.97 

(1)Production costs include all operating expenses, depreciation, depletion and amortization, lease operating expenses (including price differentials) and all associated taxes. Impairment of oil and gas properties is not included in production costs.
(2)Direct lifting costs do not include impairment expense or depreciation, depletion and amortization, but do include transportation costs, which are paid to our purchasers as a price differential.

Results of Oil and Gas Producing Activities

The following table shows the results of operations from our oil and gas producing activities from the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Results of operations from these activities have been determined using historical revenues, production costs, depreciation, depletion and amortization of the capitalized costs subject to amortization. General and administrative expenses and interest expense have been excluded from this determination.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Production revenues $1,329,004  $2,461,727 
Production costs  (1,363,946)  (2,661,258)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  (127,713)  (254,329)
Results of operations for producing activities $(162,655) $(453,860)

Active Wells

The following table sets forth the number of wells in which we owned a working interest that were actively producing oil and gas or actively injecting water as of December 31, 2017.

  Active 
Project Gross  Net(1) 
Crude Oil        
Mississippian Project  45   40.5 
Other  3   2.7 
Total Oil  48   43.2 

(1)Net wells are based on our net working interest as of December 31, 2017.


Reserves

Proved Reserves

The estimated total PV10 (present value) of our proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 was $1.5 million, compared to $3.4 million as of December 31, 2016. Our total net proved oil and gas reserves as of December 31, 2017 were 0.5 million BOE (100% oil), compared to 1.6 million BOE (64.1% natural gas) as of December 31, 2016. Of the 0.5 million net BOE of total proved reserves at December 31, 2017, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped. See “Glossary” on page 14 for our definition of PV10.

The estimated PV10 of the 0.5 million BOE is set forth in the following table. The PV10 is calculated using an average net oil price of $45.45 per barrel and by applying an annual discount rate of 10% to the forecasted future net cash flow.

Summary of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

December 31, 2017

  Gross  Net    
     Natural
Gas 
     Oil      Natural
Gas 
     Oil     
Proved Reserves Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  PV 10(2) 
Category BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s  BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s(1)  (before tax) 
Proved, Developed  94,100         94,100   66,810         66,810   511,740 
Proved, Undeveloped  525,100         525,100   388,980         388,980   956,800 
Total Proved  619,200         619,200   455,800         455,800   1,468,540 

(1)Net BOE is based upon our net revenue interest
(2)See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Reserves” page 34 for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.

Oil and Gas Reserves Reported to Other Agencies

We did not file any estimates of total proved net oil and gas reserves with, or include such information in reports to any federal authority or agency, other than the SEC, during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Title to Properties

We believe that we have satisfactory title to or rights in all of our producing properties. As is customary in the oil and gas industry, minimal investigation of title is made at the time of acquisition of undeveloped properties. In most cases, we investigate title and obtain title opinions from counsel or have title reviewed by professional landmen only when we acquire producing properties or before we begin drilling operations. However, any acquisition of producing properties without obtaining title opinions is subject to a greater risk of title defects.

Our properties are subject to customary royalty interests, liens under indebtedness, liens incident to operating agreements and liens for current taxes and other burdens, including mineral encumbrances and restrictions. Further, our debt is secured by liens substantially on all of our assets. These burdens have not materially interfered with the use of our properties in the operation of our business to date, though there can be no assurance that such burdens will not materially impact our operations in the future.

Sale of Oil and Gas

We do not intend to refine our oil production. We expect to sell all or most of our production to a small number of purchasers in a manner consistent with industry practices at prevailing rates by means of long-term and short-term sales contracts, some of which may have fixed price components. In 2017, we sold oil to ARM Energy Management LLC, Coffeyville Resources, Inc., and Sunoco Logistics, Inc. on a month-to-month basis (i.e., without a long-term contract). We sold our natural gas to United Energy Trading on a month-to-month basis and Western Operating Company under a long-term contract. Under current conditions, we should be able to find other purchasers, if needed. All of our produced oil is held in tank batteries. Each respective purchaser picks up the oil from our tank batteries and transports it by truck to refineries.


Secondary Recovery and Other Production Enhancement Strategies

When an oil field is first produced, the oil typically is recovered as a result of natural pressure within the producing formation, often assisted by pumps of various types. The only natural force present to move the crude oil to the wellbore is the pressure differential between the higher pressure in the formation and the lower pressure in the wellbore. At the same time, there are many factors that act to impede the flow of crude oil, depending on the nature of the formation and fluid properties, such as pressure, permeability, viscosity and water saturation. This stage of production is referred to as “primary production”, which typically only recovers 5% to 15% of the crude oil originally in place in a producing formation.

Production from oil fields can often be enhanced through the implementation of “secondary recovery”, also known as water flooding, which is a method in which water is injected into the reservoir through injector wells in order to maintain or increase reservoir pressure and push oil to the adjacent producing wellbores. We utilize water flooding as a secondary recovery technique for the majority of our oil properties in Kansas.

As a water flood matures over time, the fluid produced contains increasing amounts of water and decreasing amounts of oil. Surface equipment is used to separate the produced oil from water, with the oil going to holding tanks for sale and the water being re-injected into the oil reservoir.

In addition, we may utilize 3D seismic analysis, horizontal drilling, and other technologies and production techniques to improve drilling results and oil recovery, and to ultimately enhance our production and returns. We also believe use of such technologies and production techniques in exploring for, developing, and exploiting oil properties will help us reduce drilling risks, lower finding costs and provide for more efficient production of oil from our properties.

Markets and Marketing

The oil and gas industry has experienced dramatic price volatility in recent years. As a commodity, global oil prices respond to macro-economic factors affecting supply and demand. In particular, world oil prices have risen and fallen in response to political unrest and supply uncertainty in the Middle East, and changing demand for energy in rapidly emerging market economies, notably India and China. North American prospects became more attractive as oil prices rose worldwide. Escalating conflicts in the Middle East and the ability of OPEC to control supply and pricing are some of the factors impacting the availability of global supply. As a commodity, natural gas prices respond mainly to regional supply and demand imbalances. Factors that affect the supply side include production of natural gas, levels of natural gas imports and fluctuations in underground storage. Factors that affect the demand side include peak demand brought on by winter heating and summer cooling requirements and increasing demand from the petrochemical industry for their produced products such as plastics, fertilizers, paints, soaps etc. The costs of steel and other products used to construct drilling rigs and pipeline infrastructure, as well as, drilling and well-servicing rig rates, are impacted by the commodity price volatility.

Our market is affected by many factors beyond our control, such as the availability of other domestic production, commodity prices, the proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines, and general fluctuations of global and domestic supply and demand. In 2017 we had month-to-month sales contracts with ARM Energy Management LLC, Coffeyville Resources, Inc., Sunoco Logistics, Inc., United Energy Trading and Western Operating Company and we do not anticipate difficulty in finding additional sales opportunities, as and when needed.

Oil and gas sales prices are negotiated based on factors such as the spot price or posted price for oil and gas, price regulations, regional price variations, hydrocarbon quality, distances from wells to pipelines, well pressure, and estimated reserves. Many of these factors are outside our control. Oil and gas prices have historically experienced high volatility, related in part to ever-changing perceptions within the industry of future supply and demand.

Competition

The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive and we must compete against larger companies that may have greater financial and technical resources than we do and substantially more experience in our industry. These competitive advantages may better enable our competitors to sustain the impact of higher exploration and production costs, oil and gas price volatility, productivity variances between properties, overall industry cycles and other factors related to our industry. Their advantage may also negatively impact our ability to acquire prospective properties, develop reserves, attract and retain quality personnel and raise capital.

Research and Development Activities

We have not spent a material amount of time or money on research and development activities in the last two years.


Governmental Regulations

Our oil and gas exploration, production and related operations, when developed, are subject to extensive rules and regulations promulgated by federal, state, tribal and local authorities and agencies that impose requirements relating to the exploration and production of oil and natural gas. For example, laws and regulations often address conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties, the spacing, plugging and abandonment of wells, rates of production, water discharge, prevention of waste, and other matters. Prior to drilling, we are often required to obtain permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and file reports concerning operations. Failure to comply with any such rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. Moreover, laws and regulations may place burdens from previous operations on current lease owners that can be significant.

The public attention on the production of oil and gas will most likely increase the regulatory burden on our industry and increase the cost of doing business, which may affect our profitability. Although we believe we are currently in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, because such rules and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted, we are unable to predict the future cost or impact of complying with such laws. Significant expenditures may be required to comply with governmental laws and regulations and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The price we may receive from the sale of oil and gas will be affected by the cost of transporting products to markets. Effective January 1, 1995, FERC implemented regulations establishing an indexing system for transportation rates for oil and gas pipelines, which, generally, would index such rates to inflation, subject to certain conditions and limitations. We are not able to predict with certainty the effect, if any, of these regulations on our intended operations. However, the regulations may increase transportation costs or reduce well head prices for oil and natural gas.

Environmental Matters

Our operations and properties are subject to extensive and changing federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment, and relating to safety and health. The recent trend in environmental legislation and regulation generally is toward stricter standards, and this trend will likely continue.

These laws and regulations may:

require the acquisitionrapid obsolescence of a permit or other authorization before construction or drilling commences and for certain other activities;
limit or prohibit construction, drilling and other activities on certain lands; and
impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from its operations, orproduct due to previous operations conducted on any leased lands.

The permits required for our operations may be subject to revocation, modification and renewal by issuing authorities. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce their regulations, and violations are subject to fines or injunctions, or both. In the opinion of management, we are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws and regulations, and have no material commitments for capital expenditures to comply with existing environmental requirements. Nevertheless, changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or in interpretations thereof could have a significant impact on us, as well as the oil and gas industry in general.

The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (“CERCLA”), and comparable state statutes impose strict, joint and several liability on owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of “hazardous substances” found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the neighboring land owners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (“RCRA”), and comparable state statutes govern the disposal of “solid waste” and “hazardous waste” and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance. Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from its definition of “hazardous substance,” state laws affecting our operations may impose clean-up liability relating to petroleum and petroleum related products. In addition, although RCRA classifies certain oil and gas field wastes as “non-hazardous”, such exploration and production wastes could be reclassified as hazardous wastes thereby making such wastes subject to more stringent handling and disposal requirements.

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended (“Clean Water Act”), and analogous state laws impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into federal and state waters. These laws also regulate the discharge of storm water in process areas. Pursuant to these laws and regulations, we are required to obtain and maintain approvals or permits for the discharge of wastewater and storm water and develop and implement spill prevention, control and countermeasure plans, also referred to as “SPCC plans”, in connection with on-site storage of greater than threshold quantities of oil and gas. The EPA issued revised SPCC rules in July 2002 whereby SPCC plans are subject to more rigorous review and certification procedures. We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable Clean Water Act and analogous state requirements, including those relating to wastewater and storm water discharges and SPCC plans.


The Endangered Species Act, as amended (“ESA”), seeks to ensure that activities do not jeopardize endangered or threatened animal, fish and plant species, nor destroy or modify the critical habitat of such species. Under ESA, exploration and production operations, as well as actions by federal agencies, may not significantly impair or jeopardize the species or its habitat. ESA provides for criminal penalties for willful violations of the Act. Other statutes that provide protection to animal and plant species and that may apply to our operations include, but are not necessarily limited to, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the National Historic Preservation Act. Although we believe that our operations will be in substantial compliance with such statutes, any change in these statutes or any reclassification of a species as endangered could subject us to significant expenses to modify our operations or could force us to discontinue certain operations altogether.

Personnel

We currently have one full-time employee. We are using and will continue to use independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, particularly in the area of land services, reservoir engineering, and general and administrative functions. We believe that this use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to contain operating and general expenses, and capital costs.

GLOSSARY

TermDefinition
Barrel (Bbl)The standard unit of measurement of liquids in the petroleum industry, it contains 42 U.S. standard gallons. Abbreviated to “bbl”.
BasinA depression in the crust of the Earth, caused by plate tectonic activity and subsidence, in which sediments accumulate. Sedimentary basins vary from bowl-shaped to elongated troughs. Basins can be bounded by faults. Rift basins are commonly symmetrical; basins along continental margins tend to be asymmetrical. If rich hydrocarbon source rocks occur in combination with appropriate depth and duration of burial, then a petroleum system can develop within the basin.
BOEAbbreviation for a barrel of oil equivalent and is a term used to summarize the amount of energy that is equivalent to the amount of energy found in a barrel of crude oil. On a BTU basis 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas is the energy equivalent to one barrel of crude oil. A conversion ratio of 6:1 is used to convert natural gas measured in thousands of cubic feet into an equivalent barrel of oil.
BOPDAbbreviation for barrels of oil per day, a common unit of measurement for volume of crude oil. The volume of a barrel is equivalent to 42 U.S. standard gallons.
Carried Working InterestThe owner of this type of working interest in the drilling of a well incurs no capital contribution requirement for drilling or completion costs associated with a well and, if specified in the particular contract, may not incur capital contribution requirements beyond the completion of the well.
Completion/CompletingThe activities and methods of preparing a well for the production of oil and gas or for other purposes such as injection.
DevelopmentThe phase in which a proven oil or natural gas field is brought into production by drilling development wells.
Development DrillingWells drilled during the Development phase.
Division OrderA directive signed by all owners verifying to the purchaser or operator of a well the decimal interest of production owned by the royalty owner and other working interest owners. The Division Order generally includes the decimal interest, a legal description of the property, the operator’s name, and several legal agreements associated with the process. Completion of this step generally precedes placing the royalty owner or working interest owner on pay status to begin receiving revenue payments.
DrillingAct of boring a hole through which oil and natural gas may be produced.
Dry WellsA well found to be incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such that proceeds from the sale of such production exceed production expenses and taxes.


ExplorationThe phase of operations which covers the search for oil and gas generally in unproven or semi-proven territory.
Exploratory DrillingDrilling of a relatively high percentage of properties which are unproven.
Farm OutAn arrangement whereby the owner of a lease assigns all or some portion of the lease or licenses to another company for undertaking exploration or development activity.
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
Fixed Price SwapA derivative instrument that exchanges or “swaps” the “floating” or daily price of a specified volume of oil or natural gas over a specified period, for a fixed price for the specified volume over the same period (typically three months or longer).
Gross AcreThe number of acres in which the Company owns any working interest.
Gross Producing WellA well in which a working interest is owned and is producing oil or gas. The number of gross producing wells is the total number of wells producing oil or gas in which a working interest is owned.
Gross WellA well in which a working interest is owned. The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned.
Held-By-Production (HBP)Refers to an oil and gas property under lease, in which the lease continues to be in force, because of production from the property.
Horizontal drillingA drilling technique used in certain formations where a well is drilled vertically to a certain depth and then turned and drilled horizontally. Horizontal drilling allows the wellbore to follow the desired formation.
In-Fill WellsIn-fill wells refers to wells drilled between established producing wells; a drilling program to reduce the spacing between wells in order to increase production and recovery of in-place hydrocarbons.
Oil and Gas LeaseA legal instrument executed by a mineral owner granting the right to another to explore, drill, and produce subsurface oil and gas. An oil and gas lease embodies the legal rights, privileges and duties pertaining to the lessor and lessee.
Lifting CostsThe expenses of producing oil and gas from a well. Lifting costs are the operating costs of the wells including the gathering and separating equipment. Lifting costs do not include the costs of drilling and completing the wells or transporting the oil and gas.
MCFAn abbreviation for one thousand cubic feet of natural gas.
Net AcresDetermined by multiplying gross acres by the working interest that the Company owns in such acres.
Net Producing WellsThe number of producing wells multiplied by the working interest in such wells.
Net Revenue InterestA share of production revenues after all royalties, overriding royalties and other non-operating interests have been taken out of production for a well(s).
OperatorA person, acting for itself, or as an agent for others, designated to conduct the operations on its or the joint interest owners’ behalf.

Overriding RoyaltyOwnership in a percentage of production or production revenues, free of the cost of production, created by the lessee, company and/or working interest owner and paid by the lessee, company and/or working interest owner out of revenue from the well.
Probable ReservesProbable reserves are additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with Proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.


Proved Developed ReservesProved reserves that can be expected to be recovered from existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. This definition of proved developed reserves has been abbreviated from the applicable definitions contained in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X.
Proved Developed Non-ProducingProved developed reserves expected to be recovered from zones behind casings in existing wells or from future production increases resulting from the effects of water flood operations.
Proved ReservesProved reserves are estimated quantities of crude oil and gas which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic, operating methods, and government regulations prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.
Proved Undeveloped ReservesProved undeveloped reserves are the portion of proved reserves which can be expected to be recovered from new, wells on undrilled proved acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for completion. This definition of proved undeveloped reserves has been abbreviated from the applicable definitions contained in Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X.
PV10PV10 means the estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development and abandonment costs, using prices and costs in effect at the determination date, before income taxes, and without giving effect to non-property related expenses, discounted to a present value using an annual discount rate of 10% in accordance with the guidelines of the SEC. PV10 is a non-GAAP financial measure.  See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Reserves” on page 34 for a reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure.
ReactivationAfter the initial completion of a well, the action and techniques of reentering the well and redoing or repairing the original completion to restore the well’s productivity.
RecompletionCompletion of an existing well for production from one formation or reservoir to another formation or reservoir that exists behind casing of the same well.
ReservoirThe underground rock formation where oil and gas has accumulated. It consists of a porous rock to hold the oil and gas, and a cap rock that prevents its escape.

Secondary RecoveryThe stage of hydrocarbon production during which an external fluid such as water or natural gas is injected into the reservoir through injection wells located in rock that has fluid communication with production wells. The purpose of secondary recovery is to maintain reservoir pressure and to displace hydrocarbons toward the wellbore.  The most common secondary recovery techniques are natural gas injection and water flooding. Normally, natural gas is injected into the natural gas cap and water is injected into the production zone to sweep oil and gas from the reservoir.  A pressure-maintenance program can begin during the primary recovery stage, but it is a form of enhanced recovery.
Stock Tank Barrel or STBA stock tank barrel of oil and gas is the equivalent of 42 U.S. Gallons at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.
Undeveloped AcreageLease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of oil and gas regardless of whether such acreage contains proved reserves.
Unitize, UnitizationWhen owners of oil and gas reservoir pool their individual interests in return for an interest in the overall unit.
Water floodThe injection of water into an oil and gas reservoir to “push” additional oil and gas out of the reservoir rock and into the wellbores of producing wells. Typically a secondary recovery process.
Water Injection WellsA well in which fluids are injected rather than produced, the primary objective typically being to maintain or increase reservoir pressure, often pursuant to a water flood.
Water Supply WellsA well in which fluids are being produced for use in a water injection well.

WellboreA borehole; the hole drilled by the bit. A wellbore may have casing in it or it may be open (uncased); or part of it may be cased, and part of it may be open. Also called a borehole or hole.
Working InterestAn interest in an oil and gas lease entitling the owner to receive a specified percentage of the proceeds of the sale of oil and gas production or a percentage of the production, but requiring the owner of the working interest to bear the cost to explore for, develop and produce such oil and gas.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

In the course of conducting our business operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks that are inherent to the oil and gas industry. The following discusses some of the key inherent risk factors that could affect our business and operations. Other factors besides those discussed below or elsewhere in this report also could adversely affect our business and operations, and these risk factors should not be considered a complete list of potential risks that may affect us.

For risk factors regarding AgEagle, its business operations and financial results, which will become our business operations and financial results following the consummation of the Merger, see the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on October 20, 2017.

Risks Related to Recent Developments

Due to our substantial liquidity concerns, we may be unable to continue as a going concern.

On October 19, 2017, EnerJex entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”), which designs, develops, produces, and distributes technologically advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV or drones) that are supplied to the agriculture industry, and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into AgEagle, Merger Sub will cease to exist and AgEagle will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). The respective boards of directors of EnerJex and AgEagle have approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.

At the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), the shares of AgEagle capital stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive equal to 85% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis. In addition, at the Effective Time all outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle common stock will be assumed by the Company and converted into options and warrants to purchase shares of Company common stock. No fractional shares of Company common stock will be issued in the Merger but will be rounded to the nearest whole share. Following the consummation of the Merger, former stockholders of AgEagle with respect to the Merger are expected to own 85% of the Company’s outstanding common stock (inclusive of the AgEagle assumed stock options and warrants), and current common and Series A Preferred stockholders of the Company are expected to own 15% of the Company, excluding shares of common stock that may be issued in connection with the conversion of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, and not including any additional shares which may be issued in connection with the Company’s closing obligation to provide up to $4 million in new working capital and the elimination of all liabilities currently on the Company’s balance sheet.

In connection with the Merger, the Company will also file a proxy statement seeking stockholder approval to: (a) amend the terms of its Series A Preferred Stock (as discussed below); (b) approve the issuance of the Company’s shares in connection with the Merger to the AgEagle shareholders and new investors, in excess of 19.9% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (c) approve the issuance of shares to current Company management and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnity obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (d) change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Resources, Inc.” 

The Merger Agreement provides that, immediately following the Effective Time, the existing board of directors and officers of the Company will resign and new directors and officers will be appointed by AgEagle.

The Company intends to dispose of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties, concurrently with the closing of the Merger. In the event the Merger is not consummated, the Company does not have a present intention to dispose of the above described assets.

 17

The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the stockholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the stockholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle stockholders in connection with the Merger and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listing of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants obligating each of the Company and AgEagle to continue to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course, to provide reasonable access to each other’s information and to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate and coordinate to make any filings or submissions that are required to be made under any applicable laws or requested to be made by any government authority in connection with the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contains a customary “no solicitation” provision pursuant to which, prior to the earlier of January 31, 2018, or the completion or termination of the Merger, neither the Company nor AgEagle may solicit or engage in discussions with any third party regarding another acquisition proposal unless, in the Company’s case, it has received an unsolicited, bona fide written proposal that the recipient’s board of directors determines is or would reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal. The Company has paid AgEagle a $50,000 non-refundable fee at the signing of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights in favor of each of the Company and AgEagle.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for indemnification in the event of any damages suffered by either party as a result of breaches of representations and warranties contained therein. The aggregate maximum indemnification obligation of any indemnifying party for damages with respect to breaches of representations and warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement shall not exceed, in the aggregate, $350,000, other than fraud, intentional misrepresentation or willful breach. An indemnifying party shall satisfy its indemnification obligations with shares of Company common stock equal to the aggregate amount of losses of the indemnified party, calculated based upon the greater of (i) the value of the Company common stock as of the closing of the Merger; and (ii) the average closing price of the Company common stock on the NYSE American for the five trading days immediately prior to the date such a claim is made. The Company has agreed to deposit an aggregate of 1,215,278 shares of common stock to be issued to current officers and directors of the Company in lieu of deferred salary and fees into escrow to secure its indemnification obligations, the issuance of such shares requiring the approval of the Company’s common stockholders.

In connection with, and as a condition to the closing of the Merger, the Company is seeking the consent of the holder of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) to amend the terms thereof to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, and (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of Company common stock. An affirmative vote of 66.7% of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock voting as a class as of the record date of the proxy statement is required to amend the terms of the Certificate of Designation to provide for these changes, as required under the Merger Agreement. As of September 30, 2017, the Series A Preferred Stock had accrued a total of $6,039,972 in accrued but unpaid dividends, which would result in an additional 241,599 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued by the Company to satisfy these accrued dividends.

The Merger Agreement provides either party the right to terminate the Merger if it has not been consummated by January 31, 2018, provided that if all of the conditions to closing shall have been satisfied or shall be capable of being satisfied at such time, the required closing date may be extended until March 31, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company extended the required closing date with AgEagle to March 31, 2018.

Should we not be able to close this transaction, our existing and future debt agreements become due and that will threaten our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will seek to negotiate an extension of such indebtedness or may seek bankruptcy protection if this transaction is not approved by the shareholders.

In the event the Merger closes, it will cause immediate and substantial dilution to existing shareholders and a change of control of the Company.

As described above, we are party to a Merger Agreement with AgEagle relating to the acquisition by us of the outstanding securities of AgEagle.  We anticipate the consideration exchanged with AgEagle for the securities of AgEagle will be 85% of our total outstanding securities on a fully-diluted basis.  Additionally, we anticipate issuing other securities in connection with the Merger, including, but not limited to, in order to raise funding in connection therewith. As such, in the event the contemplated transaction closes, the issuance of the common stock consideration to AgEagle and to other parties will result in immediate and substantial dilution to the interests of our then shareholders and result in a change of control of the Company.

 18

The Merger Agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger.

The Merger Agreement contains provisions that could adversely impact competing proposals to acquire us. These provisions include the prohibition on us generally from soliciting any acquisition proposal or offer for a competing transaction. These provisions might discourage a third party that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of our company from considering or proposing an acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay consideration with a higher value than the current proposed Merger consideration.

Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact our stock price and future business and financial results.

If the Merger is not completed, our ongoing business may be adversely affected and we would be subject to a number of risks, including the following:

we will not realize the benefits expected from the Merger, including a potentially enhanced competitive and financial position, expansion of operations, and will instead be subject to all the risks we currently face as an independent company;more advanced technologies;
   
 we may experience negative reactionsprohibitive production costs;
competing products;
lack of product innovation;
unsuccessful distribution and marketing through our sales channels;
insufficient cooperation from our supply and distribution partners; and
product development that does not align with or meet customer needs.

Our success in the market for the products and services we develop will depend largely on our ability to properly demonstrate their capabilities. Upon demonstration, our solutions may not have the capabilities they were designed to have or that we believed they would have. Furthermore, even if we do successfully demonstrate our products’ capabilities, potential customers may be more comfortable doing business with a competitor; or may not feel there is a significant need for the products we develop. As a result, significant revenue from our current and new product investments may not be achieved for several years, if at all.

We face competition from other companies, many of which have substantially greater resources.

Our competitors may be able to provide customers with different or greater capabilities or benefits than we can provide in areas such as technical qualifications, past contract performance, geographic presence, price and the availability of key professional personnel. Furthermore, many of our competitors may be able to utilize their substantially greater resources and economies of scale to develop competing products and technologies, manufacture in high volumes more efficiently, divert sales away from us by winning broader contracts or hire away our employees by offering more lucrative compensation packages. Small business competitors may be able to offer more cost competitive solutions, due to their lower overhead costs. The markets for commercial drones and services are quickly expanding, and competition is intensifying as additional competitors enter the market and current competitors expand their product offerings. In order to secure contracts successfully when competing with larger, better financed companies, we may be forced to agree to contractual terms that provide for lower aggregate payments to us over the life of the contract, which could adversely affect our margins. Our failure to compete effectively with respect to any of these or other factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or future operating results.

If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, we could lose our ability to compete in the marketplace.

Our intellectual property and proprietary rights are important to our ability to remain competitive and successful in the development of our products and to our future growth potential. Patent protection can be limited and not all intellectual property can be patented. We expect to rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements and procedures, non-competition agreements and other contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property, other proprietary rights and our brand. As we currently do not have any granted patent or copyright protections, we must rely on trade secrets and nondisclosure agreements, which provide limited protections. Our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by third parties. We may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or other trade secrets by employees or competitors.

Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop technologies and products that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies and products, which could result in decreased revenues. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs to us and substantial diversion of management’s attention. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property, our competitors could use it to enhance their products. Our inability to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business and financial condition, and the value of our brand and other intangible assets.

Other companies may claim that we infringe their intellectual property, which could materially increase our costs and harm our ability to generate future revenue and profit.

We do not believe that our technologies infringe on the proprietary rights of any third party; however claims of infringement are becoming increasingly common and third parties may assert infringement claims against us. It may be difficult or impossible to identify, prior to receipt of notice from a third party, the trade secrets, patent position or other intellectual property rights of a third party, either in the United States or in foreign jurisdictions. Any such assertion may result in litigation or may require us to obtain a license for the intellectual property rights of third parties. If we are required to obtain licenses to use any third-party technology, we would have to pay royalties, which may significantly reduce any profit on our products. In addition, any such litigation could be expensive and disruptive to its ability to generate revenue or enter into new market opportunities. If any of our products were found to infringe other parties’ proprietary rights and we are unable to come to terms regarding a license with such parties, we may be forced to modify our products to make them non-infringing or to cease production of such products altogether.

The nature of our business involves significant risks and uncertainties that may not be covered by insurance or indemnification.

We have developed and sold products and services in circumstances where insurance or indemnification may not be available, for example, in connection with the collection and analysis of various types of information. In addition, our products and services raise questions with respect to issues of civil liberties, intellectual property, trespass, conversion and similar concepts, which may create legal issues. Indemnification to cover potential claims or liabilities resulting from the failure of any technologies that we develop or deploy may be available in certain circumstances but not in others. Currently, the unmanned aerial systems industry lacks a formative insurance market. We may not be able to maintain insurance to protect against all operational risks and uncertainties that our customers confront. Substantial claims resulting from an accident, product failure, or personal injury or property liability arising from our products and services in excess of any indemnity or insurance coverage (or for which indemnity or insurance coverage is not available or is not obtained) could harm our financial condition, cash flows and operating results. Any accident, even if fully covered or insured, could negatively affect our reputation among our customers and the public, and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively.

We may incur substantial product liability claims relating to our products.

As a manufacturer of UAV products, and with aircraft and aviation sector companies under increased scrutiny, claims could be brought against us if use or misuse of one of our UAV products causes, or merely appears to have caused, personal injury or death. In addition, defects in our products may lead to other potential life, health and property risks. Any claims against us, regardless of their merit, could severely harm our financial condition, strain our management and other resources. We are unable to predict if we will be able to obtain or maintain product liability insurance for any products that may be approved for marketing.

One of our contracts related to manufacturing and assembly of drones for the purpose of package delivery contains performance obligations that require innovative design capabilities, are technologically complex, require state-of-the-art manufacturing and assembly expertise, or are dependent upon factors not wholly within our control. Failure to meet these obligations could adversely affect our growth and future prospects. Early termination of client contracts or contract penalties could adversely affect our revenues.

We design, develop, manufacture and assemble technologically advanced and innovative UAVs, which are expected to be applied by our first customer for drone-enabled package delivery in a variety of environments. Problems and delays in development or delivery as a result of issues with respect to design, technology, licensing and intellectual property rights, labor, inability to achieve learning curve assumptions, manufacturing materials or components could prevent us from meeting contract requirements. Either we or the customer may generally terminate a contract as a result of a material uncured breach by the other. If we breach a contract or fail to perform in accordance with contractual service levels, delivery schedules, performance specifications, or other contractual requirements set forth in our contracted scope of services, the other party thereto may terminate such contract for default, and we may be required to refund money previously paid to us by the customer or to pay penalties or other damages. Even if we have not breached, we may deal with various situations from time to time that may result in the amendment or termination of a contract. These steps can result in significant current period charges and/or reductions in current or future revenue. Other factors that may affect revenue and future profitability include inaccurate cost estimates, design issues, unforeseen costs and expenses not covered by insurance or indemnification from the customer, diversion of management’s focus in responding to unforeseen problems, and loss of follow-on work.

If our subcontractors or suppliers fail to perform their contractual obligations, our performance and reputation as a contractor and our ability to obtain future business could suffer.

As a prime contractor, we often rely upon other companies to perform work we are obligated to perform for our customers. As we secure more work under certain of our contracts, we expect to require an increasing level of support from subcontractors that provide complementary or supplementary services to our offers. We are responsible for the work performed by our subcontractors, even though in some cases we have limited involvement in that work. If one or more of our subcontractors fails to satisfactorily perform the agreed-upon services on a timely basis or violates contracting policies, laws or regulations, our ability to perform our obligations as a prime contractor or meet our customers’ requirements may be compromised. In extreme cases, performance or other deficiencies on the part of our subcontractors could result in a customer terminating our contract for default. A termination for default could expose us to liability, including liability for the costs of re-procurement, could damage our reputation and could hurt our ability to compete for future contracts.

For certain of the components included in our products, there are a limited number of suppliers we can rely upon. If we are unable to obtain these components when needed, we could experience delays in the manufacturing of our products and our financial results could be adversely affected.

We acquire most of the components for the manufacture of our products from suppliers and subcontractors. We have not entered into any agreements or arrangements with any potential suppliers or subcontractors. Suppliers of some of the components may require us to place orders with significant lead-times to assure supply in accordance with its manufacturing requirements. Our present lack of working capital may cause us to delay the placement of such orders and may result in delays in supply. Delays in supply may significantly hurt our ability to fulfill our contractual obligations and may significantly hurt our business and result of operations. In addition, we may not be able to continue to obtain such components from these suppliers on satisfactory commercial terms. Disruptions of its manufacturing operations would ensue if we were required to obtain components from alternative sources, which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to recruit and retain key management, technical and sales personnel, our business would be negatively affected.

For our business to be successful, we need to attract and retain highly qualified executive, technical and sales personnel. The failure to recruit additional key personnel when needed, with specific qualifications, on acceptable terms and with an ability to maintain positive relationships with our partners, might impede our ability to continue to develop, commercialize and sell our products and services. To the extent the demand for skilled personnel exceeds supply, we could experience higher labor, recruiting and training costs in order to attract and retain such employees. The loss of any members of our management team may also delay or impair achievement of our business objectives and result in business disruptions due to the time needed for their replacements to be recruited and become familiar with our business. We face competition for qualified personnel from other companies with significantly more resources available to them and thus may not be able to attract the level of personnel needed for our business to succeed.

If our proposed marketing efforts are unsuccessful, we may not earn enough revenue to become profitable.

Our future growth depends on our gaining market acceptance and regular production orders for our products and services. Our marketing plan includes attendance at trade shows, making private demonstrations, advertising, public relations, promotional materials and advertising campaigns in print and/or broadcast media. In the event we are not successful in obtaining a significant volume of orders for our products and services, we will face significant obstacles in expanding our business. We cannot give any assurance that our marketing efforts will be successful. If they are not, revenue may not be sufficient to cover our fixed costs and we may not become profitable.

Our operating margins may be negatively impacted by reduction in sales or products sold.

Expectations regarding future sales and expenses are largely fixed in the short term. We maintain raw materials and finished goods at a volume we feel is necessary for anticipated distribution and sales. Therefore, we may not be able to reduce costs in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfalls between forecasted and actual sales.

We face a significant risk of failure because we cannot accurately forecast our future revenues and operating results.

The rapidly changing nature of the markets in which we compete makes it difficult to accurately forecast our revenues and operating results. Furthermore, we expect our revenues and operating results to fluctuate in the future due to a number of factors, including the following:

the financial marketstiming of sales or subscription of our products;
unexpected delays in introducing new products and services;
increased expenses, whether related to sales and marketing or administration; and
costs related to possible acquisitions of businesses.

Rapid technological changes may adversely affect the market acceptance of our products and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The markets in which we compete are subject to technological changes, introduction of new products, change in customer demands and evolving industry standards. Our future success will depend upon our ability to keep pace with technological developments and to timely address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers by supporting existing and new technologies and by developing and introducing enhancements to our current products and services and new products and services. We may not be successful in developing and marketing enhancements to our products that will respond to technological change, evolving industry standards or customer requirements. In addition, we may experience difficulties internally or in conjunction with key vendors and partners that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and sale of such enhancements and such enhancements may not adequately meet the requirements of the market and may not achieve any significant degree of market acceptance. If release dates of our new products or enhancements are delayed or, if when released, they fail to achieve market acceptance, our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals from the FAA or other governmental agencies, or limitations put on the use of small UAS in response to public privacy concerns, may prevent us from expanding the sales of our drone solutions to commercial and industrial customers in the United States.

  The regulation of small UAS for commercial use in the United States is undergoing substantial change and the ultimate treatment is uncertain. In 2006, the FAA issued a clarification of its existing policies stating that in order to engage in commercial use of small UAS in the U.S. National Airspace System, a public operator must obtain a COA from the FAA or fly in restricted airspace. The FAA’s COA approval process requires that the public operator certify the airworthiness of the aircraft for its intended purpose, that a collision with another aircraft or other airspace user is extremely improbable, that the small unmanned aircraft system complies with appropriate cloud and terrain clearances and that the operator or spotter of the small unmanned aircraft system is generally within one half-mile laterally and 400 feet vertically of the small unmanned aircraft system while in operation. Furthermore, the FAA’s clarification of existing policy stated that the rules for radio-controlled hobby aircraft do not apply to public or commercial use of small UAS.

 On February 14, 2012, the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 was enacted, establishing various deadlines for the FAA to allow expanded use of small UAS for both public and commercial applications. On June 21, 2016, the FAA released its final rules regarding the routine use of certain small UAS (under 55 pounds) in the U.S. National Airspace System pursuant to the act (the “Part 107 Rules”). The Part 107 Rules, which became effective in August 2016, provided safety regulations for small UAS conducting non-recreational operations and contain various limitations and restrictions for such operations, including a requirement that operators keep UAS within visual-line-of-sight and prohibiting flights over unprotected people on the ground who are not directly participating in the operation of the UAS. On December 28, 2020, the FAA announced final rules requiring remote identification of drones and allowing operators of small drones to fly over people and at night under certain conditions. We cannot assure you that any final rules enacted in furtherance of the FAA’s announced proposals will result in the expanded use of our drones and drone solutions by commercial and industrial entities. In addition, there exists public concern regarding the privacy implications of U.S. commercial use of small UAS. This concern has included calls to develop explicit written policies and procedures establishing usage limitations. We cannot assure you that the response from regulatory agencies, customers and privacy advocates to these concerns will not delay or restrict the adoption of small UAS by the commercial use markets.

Federal, state and tribal government regulation of domestic hemp cultivation is new and subject to constant change and evolution, and unfavorable developments could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

Any changes in laws or regulations relating to domestic hemp cultivation could adversely affect our business, results of operations and our business prospects for our HempOverview SaaS platform.

Our future results may be affected by various legal and regulatory proceedings and legal compliance risks, including those involving product liability, antitrust, intellectual property, environmental, regulations of the FAA, regulations of the USDA and state or tribal departments of agriculture, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery, anti-corruption or other matters.

The outcome of any future legal proceedings may differ from our expectations because the outcomes of litigation, including regulatory matters, are often difficult to reliably predict. Various factors or developments can lead us to change current estimates of liabilities and related insurance receivables where applicable; or make such estimates for matters previously not susceptible of reasonable estimates, such as a significant judicial ruling or judgment, a significant settlement, significant regulatory developments or changes in applicable law. A future adverse ruling, settlement or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or cash flows in any particular period. We are not currently involved in or subject to any such legal or regulatory proceedings, but we cannot guarantee that such proceedings may not occur in the future.

We may pursue additional strategic transactions in the future, which could be difficult to implement, disrupt our business or change our business profile significantly.

We intend to consider additional potential strategic transactions, which could involve acquisitions of businesses or assets, joint ventures or investments in businesses, products or technologies that expand, complement or otherwise relate to our current or future business. We may also consider, from time to time, opportunities to engage in joint ventures or other business collaborations with third parties to address particular market segments. Should our relationships fail to materialize into significant agreements, or should we fail to work efficiently with these companies, we may lose sales and marketing opportunities and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

These activities, if successful, create risks such as, among others: (i) the need to integrate and manage the businesses and products acquired with our own business and products; (ii) additional demands on our resources, systems, procedures and controls; (iii) disruption of our ongoing business; (iv) potential unknown or unquantifiable liabilities associated with the target company; and (v) diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. Moreover, these transactions could involve: (a) substantial investment of funds or financings by issuance of debt or equity securities; (b) substantial investment with respect to technology transfers and operational integration; and (c) the acquisition or disposition of product lines or businesses. Also, such activities could result in one-time charges and expenses and have the potential to either dilute the interests of our existing shareholders or result in the issuance of, or assumption of debt. Such acquisitions, investments, joint ventures or other business collaborations may involve significant commitments of financial and other resources. Any such activities may not be successful in generating revenue, income or other returns, and any resources we committed to such activities will not be available to us for other purposes. Moreover, if we are unable to access the capital markets on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to consummate acquisitions, or may have to do so on the basis of a less than optimal capital structure. Our inability to take advantage of growth opportunities or address risks associated with acquisitions or investments in businesses may negatively affect our operating results.

Additionally, any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets acquired in an acquisition or in an investment, or charges to earnings associated with any acquisition or investment activity, may materially reduce our earnings. Future acquisitions or joint ventures may not result in their anticipated benefits and we may not be able to properly integrate acquired products, technologies or businesses with our existing products and operations or successfully combine personnel and cultures. Failure to do so could deprive us of the intended benefits of those acquisitions.

Breaches of network or information technology security could have an adverse effect on our business.

Cyber-attacks or other breaches of network or IT security may cause equipment failures or disrupt our systems and operations. We may be subject to attempts to breach the security of our networks and IT infrastructure through cyber-attack, malware, computer viruses and other means of unauthorized access. The potential liabilities associated with these events could exceed the insurance coverage we maintain. Our inability to operate our facilities as a result of such events, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses or loss of market share to other competitors in the defense electronics market. In addition, a failure to protect the privacy of customer and employee confidential data against breaches of network or IT security could result in damage to our reputation. To date, we have not been subject to cyber-attacks or other cyber incidents which, individually or in the aggregate, resulted in a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

The preparation of our financial statements involves use of estimates, judgments and assumptions, and our financial statements may be materially affected if our estimates prove to be inaccurate.

Financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States require the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts. Different estimates, judgments, and assumptions reasonably could be used that would have a material effect on the financial statements, and changes in these estimates, judgments and assumptions are likely to occur from period to period in the future. These estimates, judgments, and assumptions are inherently uncertain, and, if they prove to be wrong, then we face the risk that charges to income will be required.

Our results could be adversely affected by natural disasters, public health crises, political crises or other catastrophic events.

Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, earthquakes and other adverse weather and climate conditions; unforeseen public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics; political crises, such as terrorist attacks, war, labor unrest, and other political instability; or other catastrophic events, such as disasters occurring at our manufacturing facilities, could disrupt our operations or the operations of one or more of our vendors. In particular, these types of events could impact our product supply chain from or to the impacted region and could impact our ability to operate. In addition, these types of events could negatively impact consumer spending in the impacted regions. Disasters occurring at our manufacturing facilities could impact our reputation and our customers’ perception of our brands. To the extent any of these events occur, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.

Our business may be adversely affected by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has evolved into a global pandemic. The coronavirus has spread to many regions of the world, including the United States. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business and operating results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning COVID-19 and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

Should the coronavirus continue to spread, our business operations could be delayed or interrupted. For instance, we currently utilize third parties to, among other things, manufacture components and parts for the proprietary and contracted drones we produce, and to perform quality testing. We also manufacture and assemble products and perform various services at our manufacturing facility. If either we or any third-parties in the supply chain for materials used in our manufacturing and assembly processes are adversely impacted by restrictions resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, our supply chain may be disrupted, limiting our ability to manufacture and assemble products.

The spread of the coronavirus, which has caused a broad impact globally, including restrictions on travel and quarantine policies put into place by businesses and governments, may have a material economic effect on our business. While the potential economic impact brought on by and the duration of the pandemic may be difficult to assess or predict, it has already caused, and is likely to result in further, significant disruptions of global financial markets, which may reduce our ability to access capital either at all or on favorable terms. In addition, a recession, depression or other sustained adverse market event resulting from the spread of the coronavirus could materially and adversely affect our business and the value of our Common Stock.

The ultimate impact of the current pandemic, or any other health epidemic, is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do not yet know the full extent of potential delays or impacts on our business or the global economy as a whole. However, these effects could have a material impact on our operations. We will continue to monitor the situation closely.

Worldwide and domestic economic trends and financial market conditions, including an economic decline in the agricultural industry, may adversely affect our operating performance.

We intend to distribute our products and services in a number of countries and derive revenues from both inside and outside the United States. We expect our business will be subject to global competition and may be adversely affected by factors in the United States and other countries that are beyond our control, such as disruptions in financial markets, economic downturns in the form of either contained or widespread recessionary conditions, elevated unemployment levels, sluggish or uneven recovery, in specific countries or regions, or in the agricultural industry; social, political or labor conditions in specific countries or regions; natural and other disasters affecting our operations or our customers and suppliers; or adverse changes in the availability and cost of capital, interest rates, tax rates, or regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Unfavorable global or regional economic conditions, including an economic decline in the agricultural industry, could adversely impact our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Our senior management and key employees are important to our customer relationships and overall business.

We believe that our success depends in part on the continued contributions of our senior management and key employees. We rely heavily on our executive officers, senior management and key employees to generate business and execute programs successfully. In addition, the relationships and reputation that members of our management team and key employees have established and maintain with certain key customers continue to our ability to maintain good customer relations and to identify new business opportunities. The loss of any of our executive officers, members of our senior management team or key employees could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives and could materially harm our business and customer relationships and impair our ability to identify and secure new contracts and otherwise manage our business.

We indemnify our officers and directors against liability to us and our security holders, and such indemnification could increase our operating costs.

Our bylaws allow us to indemnify our officers and directors against claims associated with carrying out the duties of their offices. Our bylaws also allow us to reimburse them for the costs of certain legal defenses. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our officers, directors or control persons, the SEC has advised that such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.

Risks Associated with Our Capital Stock

The market price of our securities may be volatile and may fluctuate in a way that is disproportionate to our operating performance.

Our securities may experience substantial volatility as a result of a number of factors, including, among others:

sales or potential sales of substantial amounts of our partners and employees;Common Stock;
announcements about us or about our competitors or new product introductions;
developments concerning our product manufacturers;
   
 the Merger Agreement places certain restrictions on the conductloss or unanticipated underperformance of our business priorglobal distribution channel;
litigation and other developments relating to our patents or other proprietary rights or those of our competitors;
conditions in the completionUAV, domestic hemp cultivation and drone-enabled package delivery industries;
governmental regulation and legislation;
variations in our anticipated or actual operating results;
changes in securities analysts’ estimates of the Mergerour performance, or the termination of the Merger Agreement. Such restrictions, the waiver of which is subjectour failure to the consent of AgEagle, may prevent us from making certain acquisitions, taking certain other specified actions or otherwise pursuing business opportunities during the pendency of the Merger;meet analysts’ expectations;
foreign currency values and fluctuations; and
   
 matters relating to the Merger (including integration planning) may require substantial commitments of timeoverall political and resources by our management, which would otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that may have been beneficial to us as an independent company.economic conditions.

 

Many of these factors are beyond our control. The Merger Agreement may be terminated in accordance with its termsstock markets have historically experienced substantial price and the Merger may not be completed.

The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the shareholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval hasvolume fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the shareholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x)unrelated or disproportionate to the AgEagle shareholders in connection with the Mergeroperating performance of these companies. These broad market and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listing of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger, the failure of whichindustry factors could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement. These conditions to the closing of the Merger may not be fulfilled and, accordingly, the Merger may not be completed. In addition, if the Merger is not completed by March 31, 2018, either we or AgEagle may choose not to proceed with the Merger, and the parties can mutually decide to terminate the Merger Agreement at any time, before or after shareholder approval. In addition, we or AgEagle may elect to terminate the Merger Agreement in certain other circumstances.

Termination of the Merger Agreement could negatively impact the Company.

In the event the Merger Agreement is terminated, our business may have been adversely impacted by our failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the Merger, andreduce the market price of our common stock might decline to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the Merger will be completed. If the Merger Agreement is terminated andsecurities, regardless of our board of directors seek another business combination, our shareholders cannot be certain that we will be able to find a party willing to offer equivalent or more attractive consideration than the consideration provided for by the Merger. actual operating performance.

 

We will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Merger is pending.

Uncertainty about the effect of the Merger on our partners may have an adverse effect on us. These uncertainties may impair our ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the Merger is completed, and could cause partners and others that deal with us to seek to change existing business relationships, cease doing business with us or cause potential new partners to delay doing business with us until the Merger has been successfully completed. Retention of certain employees may be challenging during the pendency of the Merger, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles or compensation structure. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the business, our business following the Merger could be negatively impacted. In addition, the Merger Agreement restricts us from making certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions until the Merger is completed or terminated without the consent of AgEagle. These restrictions may prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the Merger.

 19

We have substantial indebtedness which is secured by substantially all of our assets.

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and the subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees the Subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties or assets. In the event we fail to repay our debts our creditors may enforce their security interests and foreclose on our assets, which would likely cause any investment in the company to become worthless.

Current volatile market conditions and significant fluctuations in energy prices may continue indefinitely, negatively affecting our business prospects and viability.

The oil and gas markets are very volatile, and we cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices. Historically, oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. Further declines in the price of oil and natural gas will have a material adverse effect on our planned operations and financial condition. Additionally, the amount of any royalty payment we receive from the production of oil and gas from our oil and gas interests will depend on numerous factors beyond our control.

We are subject to the Continued Listing Criteria of the NYSE American and our failure to satisfy these criteria may result in delisting of our common stock.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American. In order to maintain this listing, we must maintain certain share prices, financial and share distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum amount of shareholders’ equity and a minimum number of public shareholders. In addition to these objective standards, the NYSE American may delist the securities of any issuer if, in its opinion, the issuer’s financial condition and/or operating results appear unsatisfactory; if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of the security has become so reduced as to make continued listing on the NYSE American inadvisable; if the issuer sells or disposes of principal operating assets or ceases to be an operating company; if an issuer fails to comply with the NYSE American’s listing requirements; if an issuer’s common stock sells at what the NYSE American considers a “low selling price” (generally trading below $0.20 per share for an extended period of time) and the issuer fails to correct this via a reverse split of shares after notification by the NYSE American (provided that issuers can also be delisted if any shares of the issuer trade below $0.06 per share); or if any other event occurs or any condition exists which makes continued listing on the NYSE American, in its opinion, inadvisable. As described below, the NYSE American has previously provided us a deficiency letter due to our common stock trading below $0.20 per share.

If the NYSE American delists our common stock, investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to, a lack of trading market for our securities, reduced liquidity, decreased analyst coverage of our securities, and an inability for us to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.

We are currently not in compliance with NYSE American continued listing standards and if we are unable to maintain compliance with NYSE American continued listing standards, our common stock may be delisted from the NYSE American equities market, which would likely cause the liquidity and market price of our common stock to decline.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American. The NYSE American will consider suspending dealings in, or delisting, securities of an issuer that does not meet its continued listing standards. If we cannot meet the NYSE American continued listing requirements, the NYSE American may delist our common stock, which could have an adverse impact on us and the liquidity and market price of our stock. 

We may be unable to comply with NYSE American continued listing standards. Our business has been and may continue to be affected by worldwide macroeconomic factors, which include uncertainties in the credit and capital markets. External factors that affect our stock price, such as liquidity requirements of our investors, as well as our performance, could impact our market capitalization, revenue and operating results, which, in turn, could affect our ability to comply with the NYSE American’s listing standards. The NYSE American has the ability to suspend trading in our common stock or remove our common stock from listing on the NYSE American if in the opinion of the exchange: (a) the financial condition and/or operating results of the Company appear to be unsatisfactory; or (b) it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of our common stock has become so reduced as to make further dealings on the exchange inadvisable; or (c) we have sold or otherwise disposed of our principal operating assets, or have ceased to be an operating company; or (d) we have failed to comply with our listing agreements with the exchange (which include that we receive additional listing approval from the exchange prior to us issuing any shares of common stock, something we have inadvertently failed to comply with in the past); or (e) any other event shall occur or any condition shall exist which makes further dealings on the exchange unwarranted.

 20

On October 19, 2017, the Company received notice from NYSE Regulation, Inc. that it is not in compliance with certain NYSE American (“NYSE American”) continued listing standards relating to stockholders’ equity. Specifically, the Company is not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(i) (requiring stockholders’ equity of $2.0 million or more if an issuer has reported losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in two of its three most recent fiscal years) of the NYSE American Company Guide (the “Company Guide”).

On November 20, 2017, the Company filed a plan of compliance with the proposed steps the Company will take to regain compliance with all applicable criteria for listing on the NYSE American and in particular Section 1003(a)(i). The plan was based in significant part upon the Merger and the associated financing.

On December 22, 2017, the Company was notified by the NYSE American that NYSE Regulation had accepted the Company’s plan to regain compliance with the NYSE American’s continued listing standards of the Company Guide by April 17, 2019, subject to periodic review by the NYSE American for compliance with the initiatives set forth in the plan. If the Company is not in compliance with the continued listing standards by April 17, 2019, or if the Company does not make progress consistent with the plan during the plan period, the NYSE Regulation staff may initiate delisting proceedings as appropriate.

Additionally, on February 28, 2018, the Company received notification (the “Deficiency Letter”) from the NYSE American that the Company’s shares of common stock have been selling for a low price per share for a substantial period of time. Pursuant to Section 1003(f)(v) of the Company Guide, the NYSE American staff determined that the Company’s continued listing is predicated on it effecting a reverse stock split of its common stock or otherwise demonstrating sustained price improvement within a reasonable period of time, which the staff determined to be until August 28, 2018. The Company’s common stock will continue to be listed on the NYSE American while it attempts to regain compliance with the Listing Standards, subject to the Company’s compliance with other continued listing requirements, as described above. The Deficiency Letter does not affect the Company’s business operations or its Securities and Exchange Commission reporting requirements. 

At the present time, the Company has obtained shareholder approval to effectuate a reverse stock split at a ratio of between one-for-two and one-for-twenty five with such ratio to be determined at the sole discretion of the Board of the Directors of the Company. The Company’s Board of Directors is currently assessing which ratio would best serve the Company’s stockholders while allowing the Company to remain compliant with the NYSE American continued listing requirements.

If we are unable to retain compliance with the NYSE American criteria for continued listing, our common stock would be subject to delisting. A delisting of our common stock could negatively impact us by, among other things, reducing the liquidity and market price of our common stock and reducing the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our common stock, which could negatively impact our ability to raise equity financing. In addition, delisting from the NYSE American might negatively impact our reputation and, as a consequence, our business. Additionally, if we were delisted from the NYSE American and we are not able to list our common stock on another national exchange we will no longer be eligible to use Form S-3 registration statements and will instead be required to file a Form S-1 registration statement for any primary or secondary offerings of our common stock, which would delay our ability to raise funds in the future, may limit the type of offerings of common stock we could undertake, and would increase the expenses of any offering, as, among other things, registration statements on Form S-1 are subject to SEC review and comments whereas take downs pursuant to a previously filed Form S-3 are not.

If we are delisted from the NYSE American, your ability to sell your shares of our common stock would also be limited by the penny stock restrictions, which could further limit the marketability of your shares.

If our common stock is delisted from the NYSE American, it would come within the definition of “penny stock” as defined in the Exchange Act and would be covered by Rule 15g-9 of the Exchange Act. That Rule imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. For transactions covered by Rule 15g-9, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, Rule 15g-9, if it were to become applicable, would affect the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell our securities, and accordingly would affect the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the public market. These additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future.

Until we repay the full amount of our outstanding credit facility, we may continue to have substantial indebtedness, which is secured by substantially all of our assets.  

While our bank sold its rights under our credit facility to the successor lender, and the successor lender has agreed to a transaction in which we can contribute certain of our assets, our shares in Oakridge Energy, and reduce our loan amount from $17,925,000 to a restated note in the original principal amount of $4,500,000, subject to a $1,200,000 discount provided that we repay the successor lender $3,300,000 prior to the original maturity date of November 1, 2017, which has been extended to March 23, 2018 and can be extended to April 30, 2018. In exchange we can retain our Kansas oil and gas assets. Unless and until this transaction closes (which is dependent on the approval of our stockholders), we will remain in default on our obligations, and the successor lender may enforce its rights as secured parties and we will likely lose all of our Kansas assets and may be forced to liquidate the Company.

 21

We are unable to fulfill our obligations under our credit facility which is adversely affecting our business.

As of December 31, 2017, we had total indebtedness of $4,457,347 under the credit facility. Our substantial indebtedness, and the related interest expense, could have important consequences to us, including:

our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, execution of our business strategy, or other general corporate purposes;
being forced to use cash flow to reduce our outstanding balance as a result of an unfavorable borrowing base redetermination;
our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service our indebtedness;
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
placing us at a competitive disadvantage as compared to our competitors that have less leverage;
our ability to capitalize on business opportunities and to react to competitive pressures and changes in government regulation;
our ability to, or increasing the cost of, refinancing our indebtedness; and
our ability to enter into marketing, hedging, optimization and trading transactions by reducing the number of counterparties with whom we can enter into such transactions as well as the volume of those transactions.

The covenants in our Credit Facility impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us.

The credit facility imposes significant operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions limit our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries, among other things, to:

incur additional indebtedness and provide additional guarantees;
pay dividends and make other restricted payments;
create or permit certain liens;
use the proceeds from the sales of our oil and gas properties;
use the proceeds from the unwinding of certain financial hedges;
engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and
consolidate, merge, sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries.

The credit facility also contains various affirmative covenants with which we are required to comply. At December 31, 2017, we were not in compliance with certain covenants. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.    

Our 2017 oil and gas reserve report shows a material decline in our estimated reserves, which will have adverse implications to our business.

Our 2017 oil and gas reserve report shows a material decline in our estimated reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil and natural gas reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond our control. For example, estimates of quantities of proved reserves and their PV10 value are affected by changes in crude oil and gas prices, because estimates are based on prevailing prices at the time of their determination. Further, reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in any exact way, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, estimates made by different engineers often vary from one another.

Current volatile market conditions and significant fluctuations in energy prices may continue indefinitely, negatively affecting our business prospects and viability.

The oil and gas markets are very volatile, and we cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices. Historically, oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. Further declines in the price of oil and natural gas will have a material adverse effect on our planned operations and financial condition. Additionally, the amount of any royalty payment we receive from the production of oil and gas from our oil and gas interests will depend on numerous factors beyond our control.

 22

We may continue to incur substantial write-downs of the carrying value of our oil and gas properties, which would adversely impact our earnings.

We review the carrying value of our oil and gas properties under the full cost method of accounting. Under the full cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is (a) the present value of future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil & gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil & gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of 10 percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditionsplus (b) the cost of properties not being amortizedplus (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortizedless (d) income tax effects related to differences between book and tax basis of properties. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an un-weighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements. 

Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) in the statement of operations. The ceiling calculation is performed quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.

Future conditions might require us to make write-downs in our assets, which would adversely affect our balance sheet and results of operations.

We review our long-lived tangible and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. We also test our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually on December 31 of each year, or when events or changes in the business environment indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit may exceed its fair value. If conditions in any of the businesses in which we compete were to deteriorate, we could determine that certain of our assets were impaired and we would then be required to write-off all or a portion of our costs for such assets. Any such significant write-offs would adversely affect our balance sheet and results of operations.

Risks Associated with our Industry

Oil and gas prices are volatile. Future price volatility may negatively impact cash flows which could result in an inability to cover our operating and/or capital expenditures.

Our future revenues, profitability, future growth and the carrying value of our properties depend substantially on the prices we realize for our oil and gas production. Our realized prices may also affect the amount of cash flow available for operating and/or capital expenditures and our ability to borrow and raise additional capital.

Oil and gas prices are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in or perceptions regarding supply and demand. Historically, the markets for oil and gas have been volatile, and they are likely to continue to be volatile in the future. Among the factors that can cause this volatility are:

commodities speculators;
local, national and worldwide economic conditions;
worldwide or regional demand for energy, which is affected by economic conditions;
the domestic and foreign supply of oil and gas;
weather conditions;
natural disasters;
acts of terrorism and war;
domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxation;
political and economic conditions in oil and gas producing countries, including those in the Middle East and South America;
impact of the U.S. dollar exchange rates on oil and gas prices;
the availability of refining capacity;
actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and other state controlled oil and gas companies relating to oil and gas price and production controls; and
the price and availability of other fuels.

It is impossible to predict oil and gas price movements with certainty. A drop in oil and gas prices may not only decrease our future revenues on a per unit basis but also may reduce the amount of oil and gas that we can produce economically. A substantial or extended decline in oil and gas prices would materially and adversely affect our future business enough to potentially force us to cease our business operations. In addition, our reserves, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to finance and execute planned capital expenditures will also suffer in such a price decline.

 23

Declining economic conditions and worsening geopolitical conditions could negatively impact our business.

Our operations are affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions. Markets in the United States and elsewhere have been experiencing volatility and disruption for more than 5 years, due in part to the financial stresses affecting the liquidity of the banking system and the financial markets generally. The consequences of a potential or prolonged recession may include a lower level of economic activity, decreasing demand for petroleum products and uncertainty regarding energy prices and the capital and commodity markets.

In addition, actual and attempted terrorist attacks in the United States, Middle East, Southeast Asia and Europe, and war or armed hostilities in the Middle East, the Persian Gulf, North Africa, Iran, North Korea or elsewhere, or the fear of such events, could further exacerbate the volatility and disruption to the financial markets and economies.

While the ultimate outcome and impact of the current economic conditions cannot be predicted, a lower level of economic activity might result in a decline in energy consumption, which may materially adversely affect the price of oil and gas, our revenues, liquidity and future growth.  Instability in the financial markets, as a result of recession or otherwise, also may affect the cost of capital and our ability to raise capital. 

The threat and impact of terrorist attacks, cyber attacks or similar hostilities may adversely impact our operations.

We cannot assess the extent of either the threat or the potential impact of future terrorist attacks on the energy industry in general, and on us in particular, either in the short-term or in the long-term. Uncertainty surrounding such hostilities may affect our operations in unpredictable ways, including the possibility that infrastructure facilities, including pipelines and gathering systems, production facilities, processing plants and refineries, could be targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror, a cyber attack or electronic security breach, or an act of war.

Improvements in or new discoveries of alternative energy technologies could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Because our operations depend on the demand for oil and used oil, any improvement in or new discoveries of alternative energy technologies (such as wind, solar, geothermal, fuel cells and biofuels) that increase the use of alternative forms of energy and reduce the demand for oil, gas and oil and gas related products could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The oil and natural gas business involves numerous uncertainties and operating risks that can prevent us from realizing profits and can cause substantial losses.

Our development, exploitation and exploration activities may be unsuccessful for many reasons, including weather, cost overruns, equipment shortages and mechanical difficulties. Moreover, the successful drilling of a well does not ensure a profit on investment. A variety of factors, both geological and market-related, can cause a well to become uneconomical or only marginally economical. In addition to their cost, unsuccessful wells can hurt our efforts to replace reserves.

The oil and natural gas business involves a variety of operating risks, including:

unexpected operational events and/or conditions;
reductions in oil and natural gas prices;
limitations in the market for oil and natural gas;
adverse weather conditions;
facility or equipment malfunctions;
title problems;
oil and gas quality issues;
pipe, casing, cement or pipeline failures;
natural disasters;
fires, explosions, blowouts, surface cratering, pollution and other risks or accidents;
environmental hazards, such as oil spills, pipeline ruptures and discharges of toxic gases;
compliance with environmental and other governmental requirements; and
uncontrollable flows of oil or natural gas or well fluids.

If we experience any of these problems, it could affect well bores, gathering systems and processing facilities, which could adversely affect our ability to conduct operations. We could also incur substantial losses as a result of:

injury or loss of life;

 24

severe damage to and destruction of property, natural resources and equipment;
pollution and other environmental damage;
clean-up responsibilities;
regulatory investigation and penalties;
suspension of our operations; and
repairs to resume operations.

Because we use third-party drilling contractors to drill our wells, we may not realize the full benefit of worker compensation laws in dealing with their employees. Our insurance does not protect us against all operational risks. We do not carry business interruption insurance at levels that would provide enough funds for us to continue operating without access to other funds. For some risks, we may not obtain insurance if we believe the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. If a significant accident or other event occurs and is not fully covered by insurance, it could impact our operations enough to force us to cease our operations.

Approximately 85.3% of our total proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 consist of undeveloped reserves, and those reserves may not ultimately be developed or produced.

Our estimated total proved PV10 (present value) before tax of reserves as of December 31, 2017 was $1.5 million, versus $3.4 million as of December 31, 2016.  Of the 0.5 million BOE of total proved reserves, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped.

Assuming we can obtain adequate capital resources, we plan to develop and produce all of our proved reserves, but ultimately some of these reserves may not be developed or produced. Furthermore, not all of our undeveloped or developed non-producing reserves may be produced in the time periods we have planned, at the costs we have budgeted, or at all. For further information please see the disclosures in “Note 14 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)” to the Financial Statements included herein.

Because we face uncertainties in estimating proved recoverable reserves, you should not place undue reliance on such reserve information.

Our reserve estimates and the future net cash flows attributable to those reserves at December 31, 2017 were prepared by Cobb & Associates, Inc., an independent petroleum consultant.  There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and cash flows from such reserves, including factors beyond our control and the control of these independent consultants and engineers. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that can be economically extracted, which cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of an estimate of quantities of reserves, or of cash flows attributable to these reserves, is a function of the available data, assumptions regarding future oil and gas prices, expenditures for future development and exploitation activities, and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Reserves and future cash flows may also be subject to material downward or upward revisions based upon production history, development and exploitation activities and oil and gas prices. Actual future production, revenue, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses, quantities of recoverable reserves and value of cash flows from those reserves may vary significantly from the assumptions and estimates in our reserve reports. Any significant variance from these assumptions to actual figures could greatly affect our estimates of reserves, the economically recoverable quantities of oil and gas attributable to any particular group of properties, the classification of reserves based on risk of recovery, and estimates of the future net cash flows. In addition, reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserves and cash flows based on the same available data. The estimated quantities of proved reserves and the discounted present value of future net cash flows attributable to those reserves included in this report were prepared by Cobb & Associates, Inc. in accordance with rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and are not intended to represent the fair market value of such reserves.

The present value of future net cash flows from our proved reserves is not necessarily the same as the current market value of our estimated reserves. We base the estimated discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves on prices and costs. However, actual future net cash flows from our oil and gas properties also will be affected by factors such as:

geological conditions;
assumptions governing future oil and gas prices;
amount and timing of actual production;
availability of funds;
future operating and development costs;
actual prices we receive for oil and gas;
changes in government regulations and taxation; and
capital costs of drilling new wells

 25

The timing of both our production and our incurrence of expenses in connection with the development and production of our properties will affect the timing of actual future net cash flows from proved reserves, and thus their actual present value. In addition, the 10% discount factor we use when calculating discounted future net cash flows may not be the most appropriate discount factor based on interest rates in effect from time to time and risks associated with our business or the oil and gas industry in general.

The differential between the New York Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX, or other benchmark price of oil and gas and the wellhead price we receive could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The prices that we receive for our oil production in Texas, Colorado and Kansas are typically based on a discount to the relevant benchmark prices, such as NYMEX, that are used for calculating hedge positions. The prices we receive for our natural gas production in Colorado is based upon local market conditions but generally we receive a discount to Henry Hub. The difference between the benchmark price and the price we receive is called a differential.  We cannot accurately predict oil and gas differentials. In recent years for example, production increases from competing North American producers, in conjunction with limited refining and pipeline capacity have widened this differential. Recent economic conditions, including volatility in the price of oil and gas, have resulted in both increases and decreases in the differential between the benchmark price for oil and gas and the wellhead price we receive.  These fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows by decreasing the proceeds we receive for our oil and gas production in comparison to what we would receive if not for the differential.  

Drilling wells is speculative, and any material inaccuracies in our forecasted drilling costs, estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect our business.

Developing and exploring for oil and gas involves a high degree of operational and financial risk, which precludes definitive statements as to the time required and costs involved in reaching certain objectives. The budgeted costs of drilling, completing and operating wells are often exceeded and can increase significantly when drilling costs rise due to a tightening in the supply of various types of oil and gas field equipment and related services. Drilling may be unsuccessful for many reasons, including geological conditions, weather, cost overruns, equipment shortages and mechanical difficulties. Moreover, the successful drilling of an oil and gas well does not ensure a profit on investment. Exploratory wells bear a much greater risk of loss than development wells. A variety of factors, both geological and market-related, can cause a well to become uneconomical or only marginally economic. Our initial drilling and development sites, and any potential additional sites that may be developed, require significant additional exploration and development, regulatory approval and commitments of resources prior to commercial development. If our actual drilling and development costs are significantly more than our estimated costs, we may not be able to continue our business operations as proposed and would be forced to modify our plan of operation.

Development of our reserves, when established, may not occur as scheduled and the actual results may not be as anticipated. Drilling activity and lack of access to economically acceptable capital may result in downward adjustments in reserves or higher than anticipated costs. Our estimates will be based on various assumptions, including assumptions over which we have control and assumptions required by the SEC relating to oil and gas prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds. We have control over our operations that affect, among other things, acquisitions and dispositions of properties, availability of funds, use of applicable technologies, hydrocarbon recovery efficiency, drainage volume and production decline rates that are part of these estimates and assumptions and any variance in our operations that affects these items within our control may have a material effect on reserves.  The process of estimating our oil and gas reserves is extremely complex, and requires significant decisions and assumptions in the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data for each reservoir. Our estimates may not be reliable enough to allow us to be successful in our intended business operations. Our actual production, revenues, taxes, development expenditures and operating expenses will likely vary from those anticipated. These variances may be material.

Unless we replace our oil and gas reserves, our reserves and production will decline, which would adversely affect our cash flows and income.

Unless we conduct successful development, exploitation and exploration activities or acquire properties containing proved reserves, our proved reserves will decline as those reserves are produced. Producing oil and gas reservoirs generally are characterized by declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. Our future oil and gas production, and, therefore our cash flow and income, are highly dependent on our success in efficiently developing and exploiting our current reserves and economically finding or acquiring additional recoverable reserves. We may be unable to make such acquisitions because we are:

unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable purchase contracts with them;
unable to obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically acceptable terms; or
outbid by competitors.

If we are unable to develop, exploit, find or acquire additional reserves to replace our current and future production, our cash flow and income will decline as production declines, until our existing properties would be incapable of sustaining commercial production.

 26

In order to exploit successfully our current oil and gas leases and others that we acquire in the future, we will need to generate significant amounts of capital.

The oil and gas exploration, development and production business is a capital-intensive undertaking. In order for us to be successful in acquiring, investigating, developing, and producing oil and gas from our current mineral leases and other leases that we may acquire in the future, we will need to generate an amount of capital in excess of that generated from our results of operations. In order to generate that additional capital, we may need to obtain an expanded debt facility and issue additional shares of our equity securities. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in either obtaining that expanded debt facility or issuing additional shares of our equity securities, and our inability to generate the needed additional capital may have a material adverse effect on our prospects and financial results of operations. If we are able to issue additional equity securities in order to generate such additional capital, then those issuances may occur at prices that represent discounts to our trading price, and will dilute the percentage ownership interest of those persons holding our shares prior to such issuances. Unless we are able to generate additional enterprise value with the proceeds of the sale of our equity securities, those issuances may adversely affect the value of our shares that are outstanding prior to those issuances.

A significant portion of our potential future reserves and our business plan depend upon secondary recovery techniques to establish production. There are significant risks associated with such techniques.

We anticipate that a significant portion of our future reserves and our business plan will be associated with secondary recovery projects that are either in the early stage of implementation or are scheduled for implementation subject to availability of capital. We anticipate that secondary recovery will affect our reserves and our business plan, and the exact project initiation dates and, by the very nature of water flood operations, the exact completion dates of such projects are uncertain. In addition, the reserves and our business plan associated with these secondary recovery projects, as with any reserves, are estimates only, as the success of any development project, including these water flood projects, cannot be ascertained in advance. If we are not successful in developing a significant portion of our reserves associated with secondary recovery methods, then the project may be uneconomic or generate less cash flow and reserves than we had estimated prior to investing the capital. Risks associated with secondary recovery techniques include, but are not limited to, the following:

higher than projected operating costs;
lower-than-expected production;
longer response times;
higher costs associated with obtaining capital;
unusual or unexpected geological formations;
fluctuations in oil and gas prices;
regulatory changes;
shortages of equipment; and
lack of technical expertise.

If any of these risks occur, it could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Any acquisitions we complete are subject to considerable risk.

Even if we make acquisitions that we believe are good for our business, all acquisitions involve potential risks, including, among other things:

the validity of our assumptions about reserves, future production, revenues and costs, including synergies;
an inability to integrate successfully the businesses we acquire;
a decrease in our liquidity by using our available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;
a significant increase in our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions;
the assumption of unknown liabilities, losses or costs for which we are not indemnified or for which our indemnity is inadequate;
the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;
an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage the acquired properties or assets;
the incurrence of other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges;
unforeseen difficulties encountered in operating in new geographic or geological areas; and
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.

Our decision to acquire a property will depend in part on the evaluation of data obtained from production reports and engineering studies, geophysical and geological analyses and seismic and other information, the results of which are often incomplete or inconclusive.

Our reviews of acquired properties can be inherently incomplete because it is not always feasible to perform an in-depth review of the individual properties involved in each acquisition. Even a detailed review of records and properties may not necessarily reveal existing or potential problems, nor will it permit a buyer to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies and potential. Inspections may not always be performed on every well, and environmental problems, such as ground water contamination, plugging or orphaned well liability are not necessarily observable even when an inspection is undertaken.

 27

We must obtain governmental permits and approvals for drilling operations, which can result in delays in our operations, be a costly and time consuming process, and result in restrictions on our operations.

Regulatory authorities exercise considerable discretion in the timing and scope of permit issuances in the regions in which we operate. Compliance with the requirements imposed by these authorities can be costly and time consuming and may result in delays in the commencement or continuation of our exploration or production operations and/or fines. Regulatory or legal actions in the future may materially interfere with our operations or otherwise have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, we are often required to prepare and present to federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the effect or impact that a proposed project may have on the environment, threatened and endangered species, and cultural and archaeological artifacts. Accordingly, the permits we need may not be issued, or if issued, may not be issued in a timely fashion, or may involve requirements that restrict our ability to conduct our operations or to do so profitably.

Due to our lack of geographic diversification, adverse developments in our operating areas would materially affect our business.

We currently only lease and operate oil and gas properties located in Kansas. As a result of this concentration, we may be disproportionately exposed to the impact of delays or interruptions of production from these properties caused by significant governmental regulation, transportation capacity constraints, curtailment of production, natural disasters, adverse weather conditions or other events which impact this area.

We depend on a small number of customers for all, or a substantial amount of our sales. If these customers reduce the volumes of oil and gas they purchase from us, our revenue and cash flow will decline to the extent we are not able to find new customers for our production.

In Kansas, we sell oil to Coffeyville Resources. There are approximately six potential purchasers of oil in Kansas. If a key purchaser were to reduce the volume of oil it purchases from us, our revenue and cash available for operations will decline to the extent we are not able to find new customers to purchase our production at equivalent prices.

We are not the operator and we have limited control over the activities on those properties.

We are not the operator of our Mississippian Project, and our dependence on the operator of this project limits our ability to influence or control the operation or future development of this project. Such limitations could materially adversely affect the realization of our targeted returns on capital related to exploration, drilling or production activities and lead to unexpected future costs.

We may suffer losses or incur liability for events for which we or the operator of a property have chosen not to obtain insurance.

Our operations are subject to hazards and risks inherent in producing and transporting oil and gas, such as fires, natural disasters, explosions, pipeline ruptures, spills, and acts of terrorism, all of which can result in the loss of hydrocarbons, environmental pollution, personal injury claims and other damage to our and others’ properties. As protection against operating hazards, we maintain insurance coverage against some, but not all, potential losses. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. As a result of market conditions, existing insurance policies may not be renewed and other desirable insurance may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The occurrence of an event that is not covered, or not fully covered, by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business depends in part on processing facilities owned by others. Any limitation in the availability of those facilities could interfere with our ability to market our oil and gas production and could harm our business.

The marketability of our oil and gas production will depend in part on the availability, proximity and capacity of pipelines and oil and gas processing facilities. The amount of oil and gas that can be produced and sold is subject to curtailment in certain circumstances, such as pipeline interruptions due to scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, excessive pressure, physical damage or lack of available capacity on such systems. The curtailments arising from these and similar circumstances may last from a few days to several months. In many cases, we will be provided only with limited, if any, notice as to when these circumstances will arise and their duration. Any significant curtailment in pipeline capacity or the capacity of processing facilities could significantly reduce our ability to market our oil and gas production and could materially harm our business.

Cost and availability of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and other services could adversely affect our ability to execute on a timely basis our development, exploitation and exploration plans.

Shortages or an increase in cost of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies or personnel could delay or interrupt our operations, which could impact our financial condition and results of operations. Drilling activity in the geographic areas in which we conduct drilling activities may increase, which would lead to increases in associated costs, including those related to drilling rigs, equipment, supplies and personnel and the services and products of other vendors to the industry. Increased drilling activity in these areas may also decrease the availability of rigs. We do not have any contracts for drilling rigs and drilling rigs may not be readily available when we need them. Drilling and other costs may increase further and necessary equipment and services may not be available to us at economical prices.

 28

Our exposure to possible leasehold defects and potential title failure could materially adversely impact our ability to conduct drilling operations.

We obtain the right and access to properties for drilling by obtaining oil and gas leases either directly from the hydrocarbon owner, or through a third party that owns the lease. The leases may be taken or assigned to us without title insurance. There is a risk of title failure with respect to such leases, and such title failures could materially adversely impact our business by causing us to be unable to access properties to conduct drilling operations.

Our reserves are subject to the risk of depletion because many of our leases are in mature fields that have produced large quantities of oil and gas to date.

A significant portion of our current operations are located in or near established fields in Kansas. As a result, many of our leases are in, or directly offset, areas that have produced large quantities of oil and gas to date.  As such, our reserves may be negatively impacted by offsetting wells or previously drilled wells, which could significantly harm our business.

Our lease ownership may be diluted due to financing strategies we may employ in the future.

To accelerate our development efforts we may take on working interest partners who will contribute to the costs of drilling and completion operations and then share in any cash flow derived from production. In addition, we may in the future, due to a lack of capital or other strategic reasons, establish joint venture partnerships or farm out all or part of our development efforts. These economic strategies may have a dilutive effect on our lease ownership and could significantly reduce our operating revenues.

We are subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental regulations, which can adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.

Development, production and sale of oil and gas in the United States are subject to extensive laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations. We may be required to make large expenditures to comply with environmental and other governmental regulations. Matters subject to regulation include, but are not limited to:

location and density of wells;
the handling of drilling fluids and obtaining discharge permits for drilling operations;
accounting for and payment of royalties on production from state, federal and Indian lands;
bonds for ownership, development and production of oil and gas properties;
transportation of oil and gas by pipelines;
operation of wells and reports concerning operations; and
taxation.

Under these laws and regulations, we could be liable for personal injuries, property damage, oil and gas spills, discharge of hazardous materials, remediation and clean-up costs and other environmental damages. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in the suspension or termination of our operations and subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties. Moreover, these laws and regulations could change in ways that substantially increase our costs. Accordingly, any of these liabilities, penalties, suspensions, terminations or regulatory changes could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations enough to possibly force us to cease our business operations.

Our operations may expose us to significant costs and liabilities with respect to environmental, operational safety and other matters.

We may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of environmental and safety requirements applicable to our oil and gas production activities. We may also be exposed to the risk of costs associated with Kansas Corporation Commission requirements to plug orphaned and abandoned wells on our oil and gas leases from wells previously drilled by third parties. In addition, we may indemnify sellers or lessors of oil and gas properties for environmental liabilities they or their predecessors may have created. These costs and liabilities could arise under a wide range of federal, state and local environmental and safety laws and regulations, including regulations and enforcement policies, which have tended to become increasingly strict over time. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs, liens and to a lesser extent, issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations. In addition, claims for damages to persons or property may result from environmental and other impacts of our operations.

 29

Strict, joint and several liability may be imposed under certain environmental laws, which could cause us to become liable for the conduct of others or for consequences of our own actions that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time those actions were taken. New laws, regulations or enforcement policies could be more stringent and impose unforeseen liabilities or significantly increase compliance costs. If we are not able to recover the resulting costs through insurance or increased revenues, our ability to operate effectively could be adversely affected.

We operate in a highly competitive environment and our competitors may have greater resources than do we.

The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive and we compete with other companies, many of which are larger and have greater financial, technological, human and other resources. Many of these companies not only explore for and produce crude oil and gas but also carry on refining operations and market petroleum and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis. Such companies may be able to pay more for productive oil and gas properties and exploratory prospects or define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or human resources permit. In addition, such companies may have a greater ability to continue exploration activities during periods of low oil and gas market prices. Our ability to acquire additional properties and to discover reserves in the future will be dependent upon our ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. If we are unable to compete, our operating results and financial position may be adversely affected.

Risks Associated with our Stock

We have ceased paying dividends on our Series A preferred stock, causing the trading price of the preferred stock to dramatically decline

On November 4, 2015, we announced that we would not be declaring the monthly dividend for the month of November 2015 on our 10.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock in order to preserve our cash resources. We have not declared the monthly dividend since. The failure to declare and pay monthly dividends on our preferred stock caused its trading price to decline substantially.

We do not expectintend to pay dividends to holderscash dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of our common stock because of the terms of our debt facility, and our need to reinvest cash flow from operations in our business.gain.

It is unlikely that we will pay any dividends to the holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. The terms of our debt facility require that the lender approve any such distributions, and the lender is unlikely to provide that consent so long as we have significant unpaid indebtedness outstanding.

 30

We have derivative securities currently outstanding and we may issue derivative securities in the future. Exercise of the derivatives will cause dilution to existing and new stockholders.

The exercise of our outstanding options and warrants, will cause additional shares of common stock to be issued, resulting in dilution to our existing and future common stockholders

We have the ability to issue additional shares of our common stock and preferred stock without asking for stockholder approval, which could cause your investment to be diluted.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize the board of directors to issue up to 250,000,000 shares of common stock and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock.   The power of the board of directors to issue shares of common stock, preferred stock or warrants or options to purchase shares of common stock or preferred stock is generally not subject to shareholder approval.  Accordingly, any additional issuance of our common stock, or preferred stock that may be convertible into common stock, or debt instruments that may be convertible into common or preferred stock, may have the effect of diluting one’s investment.

Although our common stock is traded on the NYSE American and our Series A preferred stock is traded on the OTC PINK, daily trading volumes are small making it difficult for investors to sell their shares.

Our common stock and our Series A preferred stock trade under the symbol “ENRJ,” and “ENRJP,” respectively but trading volume has been minimal. Therefore, the market for our common stock is limited. The trading price of our stock could be subject to wide fluctuations. Investors may not be able to purchase additional shares or sell their shares within the time frame or at a price they desire.

The price of our common stock and Series A preferred stock may be volatile and you may not be able to resell your shares at a favorable price.

Regardless of whether an active trading market for our stock develops, the market price of our stock may be volatile and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you paid for such shares. Many factors beyond our control, including but not limited to the following factors could affect our stock price:

our operating and financial performance and prospects;
quarterly variations in the rate of growth of our financial indicators, such as net income or loss per share, net income or loss and revenues;
changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports by analysts about us or the exploration and production industry;
potentially limited liquidity;
actual or anticipated variations in our reserve estimates and quarterly operating results;
changes in oil and gas prices;
sales of our common stock by significant stockholders and future issuances of our common stock;
increases in our cost of capital;
changes in applicable laws or regulations, court rulings and enforcement and legal actions;
commencement of or involvement in litigation;
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
additions or departures of key management personnel;
general market conditions, including fluctuations in and the occurrence of events or trends affecting the price of oil and gas; and
domestic and international economic, legal and regulatory factors unrelated to our performance.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation, restated bylaws and Nevada Law contain provisions that could discourage an acquisition or change of control of us.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock and common stock without stockholder approval. The election by our board of directors to issue Series A preferred stock, and any future election to issue more preferred stock, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. In addition, provisions of the articles of incorporation and bylaws could also make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us. Furthermore, Nevada’s “Combination with Interested Stockholders’ Statute” and its “Control Share Acquisition Statute” may have the effect in the future of delaying or making it more difficult to effect a change in control of us.

These statutory anti-takeover measures may have certain negative consequences, including an effect on the ability of our stockholders or other individuals to (i) change the composition of the incumbent board of directors; (ii) benefit from certain transactions which are opposed by the incumbent board of directors; and (iii) make a tender offer or attempt to gain control of us, even if such attempt were beneficial to us and our stockholders. Since such measures may also discourage the accumulations of large blocks of our common stock by purchasers whose objective is to seek control of us or have such common stock repurchased by us or other persons at a premium, these measures could also depress the market price of our common stock. Accordingly, our stockholders may be deprived of certain opportunities to realize the “control premium” associated with take-over attempts.

 31

We have no plans to pay dividends on our common stock. You may not receive funds without selling your stock.

 

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to financefund the expansiondevelopment and growth of our business. In addition, the terms of existing and future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, from the sale of our Common Stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.

Provisions in our articles of incorporation, our by-laws and Nevada law might discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our Common Stock.

Provisions of our Articles of Incorporation, our By-Laws and Nevada law may have the effect of deterring unsolicited takeovers or delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company or changes in our management, including transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. In addition, these provisions may limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests. These provisions include:

the inability of stockholders to call special meetings; and
the ability of our board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could include the right to approve an acquisition or other change in our control or could be used to institute a rights plan, also known as a poison pill, that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, likely preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board of directors.

The existence of the forgoing provisions and anti-takeover measures could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our Common Stock. They could also deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you could receive a premium for your Common Stock in an acquisition.

We will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public reporting company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a public reporting company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, have imposed various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time consuming and costly. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance.

We currently have outstanding, and we may in the future dividend policy with regardissue, instruments which are convertible into shares of Common Stock, which will result in additional dilution to our common stockshareholders.

We currently have an outstanding instrument which is withinconvertible into shares of Common Stock, and we may need to issue similar instruments in the discretionfuture. In the event that these convertible instruments are converted into shares of outstanding Common Stock, or that we make additional issuances of other convertible or exchangeable securities, you could experience additional dilution. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to issue shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is equal to or greater than the price per share paid by investors or the then current market price.

FINRA sales practice requirements may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our boardsecurities.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) has adopted rules that a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that an investment recommended to a customer is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives, and other information. Under interpretations of directors andthese rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will depend upon various factors, includingnot be suitable for certain customers. FINRA requirements will likely make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our Common Stock, which may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the shares, resulting in fewer broker-dealers may be willing to make a market in our shares, potentially reducing a stockholder’s ability to resell our securities.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, financial condition,if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our shares or if our results of operations capital requirements, investment opportunitiesdo not meet their expectations, the price of our securities and restrictions contained in current or future financing instruments, including the consent of debt holders and holders of Series A Shares, if applicable at such time, and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.trading volume could decline.

 

Shareholders mayThe trading market for our securities will be diluted significantly throughinfluenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our effortsbusiness. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of these analyst’s cease coverage of our company or fail to obtain financing and satisfy obligations throughpublish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the issuancefinancial markets, which in turn could cause our share price or trading volume to decline. Moreover, if one or more of securities.the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock, or if our results of operations do not meet their expectations, the price of our securities could decline.

 

Wherever possible, our board of directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations. In many instances, we believe that the non-cash consideration will consist of shares of our common stock, preferred stock or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, subject to the requirements of the NYSE American (which generally require shareholder approval for any transactions which would result in the issuance of more than 20% of our then outstanding shares of common stock or voting rights representing over 20% of our then outstanding shares of stock), to issue all or part of the authorized but unissued shares of common stock, preferred stock or warrants to purchase such shares of common stock. In addition, we may attempt to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock, possibly at a discount to market in the future. These actions will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing shareholders and may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material. Such issuances may also serve to enhance existing management’s ability to maintain control of us, because the shares may be issued to parties or entities committed to supporting existing management.

Additional Risks and Uncertainties

We are an oil and gas acquisition, exploration and development company. If any of the risks that we face actually occur, irrespective of whether those risks are described in this section or elsewhere in this report, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

The Company leases a building located at 8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas 67226, which serves as our corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility. The commencement date of the lease was November 1, 2020 and will expire on October 31, 2023, unless sooner terminated or extended. The aggregate estimated rent payments due over the initial three-year term is $297,000. The landlord may grant the Company the option to extend the term for an additional 36 months. The aggregate estimated rent payments due over the option term would be $314,640.

 

FacilitiesPreviously the Company leased manufacturing space located at 117 South 4th Street, Neodesha, Kansas 66757. This served as our corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility. The facility was a lease of 4,000 square feet at a cost of $600 per month. This lease was officially terminated on November 30, 2020.

 

ExecutiveAs a result of the Agribotix acquisition, the Company assumed a lease for offices are maintained at 4040 Broadway, Suite 425, San Antonio, Texas 78209 underin Boulder, Colorado for $2,000 a month-to-month agreement. month. The lease was officially terminated on November 30, 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and our intention to protect the health and safety of our employees, our workforce in Colorado has been working from their respective home offices. Once the nation’s vaccination program gains greater momentum or herd immunity is achieved, we expect to lease new commercial office space in or around Denver, Colorado, which may occur later this year.

 

Oil and Gas Properties

Information regarding the Company’s oil and gas properties can be found in “Item 1. Business”, above and under “Note 14 - Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)” to the Financial Statements included herein.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may become involved in lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. Although we currently maintain liability insurance coverage intended to cover professional liability and certain other claims, we cannot assure that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us in the future where the outcomes of such claims are unfavorable to us. Liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage, including coverage for professional liability and certain other claims, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.Lopez v. AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01810 (C.D. Cal.)

On February 26, 2021, Shawn Lopez filed a shareholder class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California seeking unspecified monetary damages for alleged violations of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the period from September 2, 2019 to February 18, 2021 against AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (“AgEagle” or the “Company”), J. Michael Drozd, Nicole Fernandez-McGovern, Bret Chilcott, and Barrett Mooney (the “Defendants”). The case is captioned Lopez v. AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01810 (C.D. Cal.) and was assigned to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Plaintiff’s initial complaint alleges, among other things, that Defendants purportedly violated the securities laws by making or approving statements that contained allegedly false representations concerning the Company’s business relationship with an e-commerce company.

Madrid v. AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01991 (C.D. Cal.)

On March 4, 2021, Cristian Jesus Merino Madrid filed a shareholder class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California seeking unspecified monetary damages for alleged violations of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the period from September 2, 2019 to February 18, 2021 against AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (“AgEagle” or the “Company”), J. Michael Drozd, Nicole Fernandez-McGovern, Bret Chilcott, and Barrett Mooney (captioned Madrid v. AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01991 (C.D. Cal.)) (the “Defendants”). Plaintiff’s initial complaint alleges, similar to the Lopez case described above, that Defendants, among other things, purportedly violated the securities laws by making or approving statements that contained allegedly false representations concerning the Company’s business relationship with an e-commerce company.

 

On September 23, 2016,March 9, 2021, this case was transferred to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick as a related case to Lopez v. AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-01810.

Nostrand and Rickerson v. Mooney et al. (Defendants) andAgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (Nominal Defendant), Case No. 3:21-cv-00130 (D. Nev.)

On March 17, 2021, John Nostrand and Drew Rickerson filed a shareholder derivative complaint on behalf of nominal defendant AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (“AgEagle” or the “Company”) against Barrett Mooney, Grant Begley, Luisa Ingargolia, Thomas Gardner, Bret Chilcott, J. Michael Drozd, and Nicole Fernandez-McGovern, seeking unspecified monetary damages and other relief for the benefit of the Company American Standard Energy Corporation, Baylor Operating LLC, Bernard Givenfor alleged breaches of fiduciary duties and Loeb & Loeb LLP were sued by Geronimo Holdings Corporation and Randal Capps inviolations of the 143rd Judicial District Court located in Pecos, Texas. The suitUnited States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the period September 3, 2019 to the present. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges, among other things, seeks damages forthat Defendants purportedly breached their fiduciary duties and violated the securities laws by making or approving statements that contained allegedly false representations concerning the Company’s business relationship with an alleged unlawful sale of properties in Crockett County Texas and for alleged unpaid royalties. e-commerce company.

The Company believes that each of the suit isforegoing complaints are without merit and willintends to vigorously defend itself. The Company has faith that it will prevail and at December 31, 2016 no reserve for potential losses arising from this matter has been recorded. Additionally, under its agreement with Baylor Operating LLC, Baylor has agreed to indemnify and defend the Companyitself against all lawsuits and claims including this one.each of these claims.

 

On April 26, 2016, C&F Ranch, LLC sued the Company in Allen County Kansas for alleged breach of contract related to the rental of certain lands located on the C&F Ranch. During the first quarter of 2018, the Company settled this dispute for $9,000.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURENot applicable.

 

None.PART II

 

 32ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information for Common Stock

 

Our common stock tradesCommon Stock is currently quoted on the NYSE American under the symbol “ENRJ.“UAVS.

The following table listssets forth, for the quotations forperiod indicated, the quarterly high and low closing sales prices per share of our common stockCommon Stock for each quarter during theour last two fiscal years, ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017. The market priceas well as a large portion of our common stock has been volatile. For an additional discussion, see “Item 1A: Risk Factors”first quarter in 2021, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016  High  Low 
Quarter ended March 31, 2016  $0.59  $0.17 
Quarter ended June 30, 2016  $0.49  $0.22 
Quarter ended September 30, 2016  $0.83  $0.26 
Quarter ended December 31, 2016  $0.46  $0.24 
Year Ended December 31, 2017         
Quarter ended March 31, 2017  $0.81  $0.26 
Quarter ended June 30, 2017  $1.15  $0.21 
Quarter ended September 30, 2017  $0.46  $0.26 
Quarter ended December 31, 2017  $0.85  $0.20 
2021 High Low
First Quarter (through March 15, 2021)  $15.69  $5.47 

 

2020 High Low
First Quarter $0.72  $0.30 
Second Quarter $2.30  $0.34 
Third Quarter $3.42  $1.15 
Fourth Quarter $7.93  $1.98 

Holders

2019 High Low
First Quarter $0.58  $0.41 
Second Quarter $0.42  $0.23 
Third Quarter $0.33  $0.23 
Fourth Quarter $0.65  $0.31 

 

As of March 15, 2018, there were 333 holders2021, we had approximately 338 individual shareholders of record of our common stock, 8 holdersCommon Stock. We believe that the number of beneficial owners of our Common Stock is greater than the number of record holders, because a number of shares of our Series A preferred stock, and one holder of both our Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock.  Common Stock is held through brokerage firms in “street name.”

 

Dividends

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock. Through October 2015, we paid a monthly dividend of $.20833 per share or $2.50 in aggregate annual dividends per share on the Company’s non-convertible 10.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock. On November 4, 2015, the Company suspended the monthly dividend for the month of November 2015 on its 10.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) in order to preserve its cash resources. Payment of future dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Under the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, any unpaid dividends, will accumulate. If the Company does not pay dividends on its Series A Preferred Stock for six monthly periods (whether consecutive or non-consecutive), the dividend rate will increase to a maximum rate of 15.0% per annum and the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will have the right, at the next meeting of stockholders, to elect two directors to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors along with other members of the Board, until all accumulated accrued and unpaid dividends are paid in full. During 2017, cash dividends were not paid and the dividends accumulated at 15.0% per annum.Dividend Policy

 

We do not expectintend to pay any cash dividends onto our common stockstockholders in the foreseeable future. Additionally, we are contractually prohibited by the termsWe currently intend to retain all of our outstanding debt from paying cash dividends on our common stock. Payment ofavailable funds and future dividends on common stock,earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. Any future determination related to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend onupon, among other factors, our financial condition, results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, contained in current or future financing instruments, including the consent of debt holders and holders of Series A Preferred Stock, if applicable at such time,business prospects and other factors our Board of Directors deemsmay deem relevant.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation PlansPlan

 

The following table sets forthprovides information as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 regarding outstanding options granted under2020 about our stock option plansequity compensation plan and options reserved for future grant under the plans.arrangements:

 

        Number of shares 
  Number     remaining available for 
  of shares to be issued     future issuance under 
  upon exercise of  Weighted-average  equity compensation 
  outstanding options,  exercise price of  plans (excluding shares 
  warrants and rights  outstanding options,  reflected in column (a) 
Plan Category (a)  warrants and rights (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders  15,332  $7.63   700,158 
Plan category Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options
and restricted stock units
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
and restricted stock units
 Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  2,525,267  $1.38   732,035 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         
Total  2,525,267  $1.38   732,035 

 

 3328

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

Except as discussed below, the Company has not issued, sold or granted any unregistered securities since September 30, 2017, other than those issuances, sales and grants which have previously been included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.None

 

On July 14, 2017, July 28, 2017 and August 30, 2017, the Company entered into Secured Promissory Notes totaling $225,000 with Alpha Capital Anstalt, which have a maturity date of June 30, 2018, and accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The amount due under the notes is secured by a security interest, subordinate to certain other security interests of the Company, in substantially all of the Company's assets. The amount due under the notes is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at the option of Alpha Capital Anstalt, on identical terms as the outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (i.e., an initial conversion price of $0.30 per share, a 9.9% ownership limitation and certain anti-dilution rights, which currently result in a conversion price of $0.0612 per share). As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $225,000 remained due.

As previously reported, on April 27, 2017, the Company entered into an Additional Issuance Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt, for the purchase of 300 restricted shares of the Company's then newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in consideration for $300,000, with an option to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had issued 300 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had received $200,000 from Alpha Capital Anstalt to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which shares had not been issued as of December 31, 2017, and which are reflected as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Issuable on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, in the aggregate amount of $200,000.

On February 13, 2018, the Company issued Alpha Capital Anstalt the 200,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock which it was due pursuant to the terms of the April 27, 2017, Additional Issuance Agreement, in consideration for the $200,000 paid during the year ended December 31, 2017.

We claim an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act, since the transactions did not involve a public offering, the recipient was an “accredited investor”, and acquired the securities for investment only and not with a view towards, or for resale in connection with, the public sale or distribution thereof. The securities are subject to transfer restrictions, and the certificates evidencing the securities contain an appropriate legend stating that such securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold absent registration or pursuant to an exemption therefrom and are further subject to the terms of the escrow agreement. The securities were not registered under the Securities Act and such securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an exemption from registration under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted (a) 343.671 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 5,610,955 shares of common stock; and (b) 103.142 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,683,944 shares of common stock, pursuant to the terms of such securities.

We claim an exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act for such issuance, as the securities were exchanged by us with our existing security holder in a transaction where no commission or other remuneration was paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchange.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Its Affiliates

 

None.

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Not applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

This Management’s Discussionitem is not required for Smaller Reporting Companies.

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion highlights the principal factors that have affected our financial condition and Analysisresults of Financial Conditionoperations as well as our liquidity and Results of Operations sectioncapital resources for the periods described. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the other sectionsrelated notes included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see the explanatory note concerning “Forward-Looking Statements” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K including “Item 1 Business” and “Item 2. Properties” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. This section includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27AItem 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements such as “will”, “believe,” “are projected to be” and similar expressions are statements regarding future events or our future performance, and include statements regarding projected operating results. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, beliefs, intentions, strategies, forecastsuncertainties, risks and assumptions and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated byassociated with these forward-looking statements. These risks include, butThe operating results for the periods presented were not significantly affected by inflation.

Company Overview

AgEagle™ Aerial Systems Inc. (“AgEagle,” “the Company,” “us,” “we,” “our”) produces, supports and operates technologically advanced drone systems and solutions for the fast-emerging unmanned aerial vehicle (“UAV”) industry. We are not limited to:engaged in delivering the metrics, tools and strategies necessary to invent and implement drone-enabled solutions that solve important problems for our abilityvalued customers. With our founding premise rooted in high performance, next-level thinking, and technological innovation, AgEagle is intent on ensuring that new standards for quality U.S. manufacturing and the provision of precision-crafted, purpose-built drone systems and solutions are delivered to deploy capitalempower our customers to thrive and prosper in The Drone Age. ™

Founded in 2010, AgEagle was originally formed to pioneer proprietary, professional-grade, fixed-wing drones and aerial imagery-based data collection and analytics solutions for the agriculture industry. In addition to selling our innovative drones to the precision and sustainable farming markets, AgEagle’s innovative data collection and analytics solutions have processed more than two million acres of crops, analyzing data from over 50 countries and 53 difference crop types, and creating more than 11,000 crop reports for its users. AgEagle remains intent on earning distinction as a manner that maximizes stockholder value;trusted partner to clients seeking to adopt and support productive agricultural approaches to improve farming practices which currently limit the ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates or business and investments opportunities; the ability to reduce our operating costs; general economic conditions and our expected liquidity in future periods. These forward-looking statements are basedimpact on our current expectationsnatural resources, reduce reliance on inputs and could be affected bymaterially increase crop yields and profits.

In the uncertaintiesfirst half of 2019, the Company introduced HempOverview, a scalable, responsive and risk factors described throughout this filingcost-effective SaaS web- and particularly inmap-based technology platform to support the “Risk Factors” set forth in Part I, Item 1Aoperations of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.domestic industrial hemp programs for state and tribal nation departments of agriculture – a solution that provides users with what the Company believes is the gold standard for regulatory oversight, operational assistance and reporting capabilities for the fast emerging industrial hemp industry.

Over the past decade, the broader drone market has continued to evolve and expand. As a result, economic and productivity benefits made possible by drones is fueling global demand for high quality, safe and reliable drone systems and solutions for commercial applications well beyond agriculture. In response, AgEagle is now leveraging our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.technological expertise and drone engineering and manufacturing experience to penetrate new, high growth market sectors; namely, drone package delivery, public safety/security, large venue decontamination and infrastructure/ inspection, among other high growth market opportunities.

 

Overview

Since the executionAgEagle’s key growth objectives are centered on three primary areas of the merger agreement on October 19, 2017, our primary business strategy has focused on achieving the requirements necessary to consummate the merger. We continue to move forward with this strategy with an anticipated closing prior to March 31, 2018. In the event the merger is not consummated, our intent is to refocus on the development of oil and gas properties. Our business activities are currently focused in Kansas.

Results of Operations

The following table presents selected information regarding our operating results from continuing operations.

  Year Ended  Year Ended    
  December 31,  December 31,    
  2017  2016  Difference 
Oil & gas revenues(1)            
Crude oil revenues $1,309,496  $2,390,024  $(1,080,528)
Average price per Bbl  41.04   40.75   0.29 
Natural gas revenues  19,509   71,703   (52,194)
Average price per Mcf  1.67   1.51   0.16 
Expenses:            
Lease operating expenses(2)  1,363,946   2,661,258   (1,297,312)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization(3)  239,776   254,329   (14,553)
Impairment of oil and gas properties     8,032,670   (8,032,670)
Total production expenses  1,603,722   10,948,257   (9,344,535)
Professional fees(4)  1,390,512   310,471   1,080,041 
Salaries(5)  350,863   1,723,789   (1,372,926)
Depreciation - other fixed assets  106,421   159,638   (53,217)
Administrative expenses(6)  545,267   458,375   86,892 
Total expenses $3,996,785  $13,600,530  $(9,603,745)

 34

(1)2017 crude oil revenues decreased $1.1 million or 45% to 1.3 million from $2.4 million in fiscal 2016.  This decrease was due to the decline in production. Realized oil prices increased $0.29 or 1% during 2017 from an average of $40.75 per bbl in 2016 to an average of $41.04 per bbl in 2017. Increasing prices offset the drop in crude oil revenues by approximately $17,000. A decrease in production volumes in 2017 accounted for substantially all of the $1.1 million decrease in revenues. Volumes decreased by approximately 26,700 bbls or 46% to 31,909 bbls in 2017 compared to production of 58,653 bbls in 2016.  2017 natural gas revenues decreased approximately $52,000 or 73% to $19,500 from $71,700 in 2016. The decrease was due to lower production in 2016. Natural gas prices increased $0.17 per mcf or 11% from an average price of $1.51 in 2016 to an average price of $1.67 in 2017. This increase in prices offset the decrease in revenue by $8,000. A decrease in production volumes accounted for $60,000 of the $52,000 decrease in revenues. Natural gas volumes decreased approximately 35,900 mcf or 76% in 2017 from 47,600 mcf in 2016 to 11,600 mcf in 2017.

(2)2017 lease operating expenses decreased $1.3 million or 49% to $1.4 million from $2.7 million in 2016. However, lease operating expenses per boe increased 1% or $0.32 to $40.29 in 2017 from $39.97 per boe in 2016.  

(3)Depletion expense per boe increased 85% or $3.26 per boe from $3.82 per boe in 2016 to $7.08 per boe in 2017. During 2017, depletion expense decreased approximately $14,000 to approximately $240,000 from $254,000 in 2016.

(4)Professional fees increased 348% or approximately $1.1 million from approximately $310,500 in 2016 to approximately $1,390,512 in 2017. The use of consultants, to replace the reduction in employees, accounted for $765,000 of this increase. In addition, legal fees increased by $309,000.

(5)Salaries decreased 80% or approximately $1.4 million. The decrease was due primarily to decreased head counts following the LSA transaction.

(6)Administrative expenses increased approximately $87,000 or 19%. The increase was due primarily to increased spending on SEC matters of $104,000.  

Reserves

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
Proved Reserves 2017  2016 
Total proved PV10 (present value) of reserves $1,468,540  $3,437,030 
Total proved reserves (BOE) $455,790  $1,587,690 
Average Price (per bbl) $51.34  $37.36 
Average Price (per mcf) $2.97  $1.65 

Of the 0.5 million BOE of total proved reserves, approximately 14.7% are classified as proved developed producing and approximately 85.3% are classified as proved undeveloped.

The following table presents summary information regarding our estimated net proved reserves as of December 31, 2017. All calculations of estimated net proved reserves have been made in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, and, except as otherwise indicated, give no effect to federal or state income taxes. The estimates of net proved reserves are based on the reserve reports prepared by Cobb & Associates Inc., our independent petroleum consultants. For additional information regarding our reserves, please see Note 14 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Summary of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

December 31, 2017

  Gross  Net 
     Natural
Gas
     Oil     Natural
Gas
     Oil    
Proved Reserves Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  Crude Oil  Liquids  Natural Gas  Equivalents  PV 10(1) 
Category BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s  BBL’s  BBL’s  MCF’s  BOE’s  (before tax) 
Proved, Developed  94,100         94,100   66,810         66,810   511,740 
Proved, Undeveloped  525,100         525,100   388,980         388,980   956,800 
Total Proved  619,200         619,200   455,800         455,800   1,468,540 

In 2017 the Company invested approximately $4,600 in its oil and gas properties. These reduced expenditures were in response to extremely low commodity prices. At year end the Company’s review of proved undeveloped reserves revealed challenges but the Company maintains its belief that reserves will be developed within five years of their initial recording as a proved undeveloped reserve. In addition, it believes it has the financial wherewithal to develop all of its proved undeveloped reserves within the five year time frames required; utilizing its balance sheet, to borrow funds as needed and it has the ability to joint venture any of its assets.

 35

(1)The following table shows our reconciliation of our PV10 to our standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (the most direct comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP). PV10 is our estimate of the present value of future net revenues from estimated proved oil and gas reserves after deducting estimated production and ad valorem taxes, future capital costs and operating expenses, but before deducting any estimates of future income taxes. The estimated future net revenues are discounted at an annual rate of 10% to determine their “present value.” We believe PV10 to be an important measure for evaluating the relative significance of our oil and gas properties and that the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure of PV10 provides useful information to investors because it is widely used by professional analysts and sophisticated investors in evaluating oil and gas companies. Because there are many unique factors that can impact an individual company when estimating the amount of future income taxes to be paid, we believe the use of a pre-tax measure is valuable for evaluating our company. We believe that most other companies in the oil and gas industry calculate PV10 on the same basis. PV10 should not be considered as an alternative to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as computed under GAAP.
  As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
  2017  2016 
PV10 (before tax) $1,468,540  $3,437,030 
Future income taxes, net of 10% discount $  $ 
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $1,468,540  $3,437,030 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to meet potential cash requirements. We have historically met our capital requirements through debt financing, revenues from operations, asset sales and the issuance of equity securities. Accordingly, the Company has chosen to preserve liquidity by not devoting capital to its oil and gas properties, while minimizing expenditures for operating, general and administrative expenses.

In conjunction with the anticipated merger, the Company will satisfy its long-term indebtedness with the sale of its assets to the existing lender and anticipates having sufficient liquidity post-merger to satisfy its other liabilities.

The following table summarizes total current assets, total current liabilities and working capital at the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.

  Year Ended  Year Ended    
  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016  Difference 
Current Assets $1,045,383  $1,678,967  $(633,584)
Current Liabilities $6,129,671  $19,754,406  $(13,624,789)
Working Capital (deficit) $(5,084,288) $(18,075,439) $12,991,151 

Senior Secured Credit Facility

On October 3, 2011, the Company, DD Energy, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC and Working Interest, LLC (“Borrowers”) entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank, N.A. (“Bank”) and other financial institutions and banks that may become a party to the Credit Agreement from time to time. The facilities provided under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement were to be used to refinance Borrowers prior outstanding revolving loan facility with Bank, dated July 3, 2008, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.

At our option, loans under the facility will bear stated interest based on the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin, or Floating Rate plus Floating Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Credit Agreement). The Base Rate will be, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (b) the Bank’s prime rate. The Floating Rate shall mean, at Borrower’s option, a per annum interest rate equal to (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus Eurodollar Margin, or (ii) the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). Eurodollar borrowings may be for one, two, three, or six months, as selected by the Borrowers. The margins for all loans are based on a pricing grid ranging from 0.00% to 0.75% for the Base Rate Margin and 2.25% to 3.00% for the Floating Rate Margin based on the Company’s Borrowing Base Utilization Percentage (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).

On December 15, 2011, we entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note in the amount of $50,000,000 with the Bank. The Amendment reflects the addition of Rantoul Partners, as an additional Borrower and adds as additional security for the loans the assets held by Rantoul Partners.

 36

On August 31, 2012, we entered into a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with the Bank. The Second Amendment: (i) increased the borrowing base to $7,000,000, (ii) reduced the minimum interest rate to 3.75% and (iii) added additional new leases as collateral for the loan.

On November 2, 2012, we entered into a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with the Bank. The Third Amendment (i) increased the borrowing base to $12,150,000 and (ii) clarified certain continuing covenants and provided a limited waiver of compliance with one of the covenants so clarified for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011.

On January 24, 2013, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was made effective as of December 31, 2012 with the Bank. The Fourth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the Bank consented to the restructuring transactions related to the dissolution of Rantoul Partners, and (ii) the Bank terminated a Limited Guaranty, as defined in the Credit Agreement, executed by Rantoul Partners in favor of the Bank.

On April 16, 2013, the Bank increased our borrowing base to $19,500,000.

On September 30, 2013, we entered into a Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Fifth Amendment reflects the following changes: it (i) expanded the principal commitment amount of the Bank to $100,000,000; (ii) increased the Borrowing Base to $38,000,000; (iii) added Black Raven Energy, Inc. to the Credit Agreement as a borrower party; (iv) added certain collateral and security interests in favor of the Bank; and (v) reduced the interest rate to 3.30%.

On November 19, 2013, we entered into a Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Sixth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the addition of Iberia Bank as a participant in our credit facility, and (ii) a technical correction to our covenant calculations.

On May 22, 2014, we entered into a Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Seventh Amendment reflects the Bank’s consent to our issuance of up to 850,000 shares of our 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock.

On August 15, 2014, we entered into an Eighth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eighth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the borrowing base was increased from $38 million to $40 million, and (ii) the maturity of the facility was extended by three years to October 3, 2018.

On April 29, 2015, we entered into a Ninth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. In the Ninth Amendment, the Bank (i) re-determined the Borrowing Base based upon the Reserve Report dated January 1, 2015, (ii) imposed affirmative obligations on the Company to use a portion of proceeds received with regard to future sales of securities or certain assets to repay the loan, (iii) consented to non-compliance by the Company with certain terms of the Credit Agreement, (iv) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, and (v) agreed to certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.

On May 1, 2015, the Borrowers and the Banks entered into a Letter Agreement to clarify that up to $1,000,000 in proceeds from any potential future securities offering will be unencumbered by the Banks’ liens as described in the Credit Agreement through November 1, 2015, and that, until November 1, 2015, such proceeds would not be subject to certain provisions in the Credit Agreement prohibiting the Company from declaring and paying dividends that may be due and payable to holders of securities issued in such potential offerings or issued prior to the Letter Agreement.

On August 12, 2015, we entered into a Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Tenth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) allow the Company to sell certain oil assets in Kansas, (ii) allow for approximately $1,300,000 of the proceeds from the sale to be reinvested in Company owned oil and gas projects and (iii) apply not less than $1,500,000 from the proceeds of the sale to outstanding loan balances.

On November 13, 2015, the Company entered into a Eleventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eleventh Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, (ii) suspended certain hedging requirements, and (iii) made certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.  

On April 1, 2016, the Company informed the Bank that it would cease making the mandatory monthly borrowing base reduction payments and did not make the required April 1, 2016 payment. The Company made its mandatory quarterly interest payments on April 6, 2016 and May 2, 2016. On April 7, 2016, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement whereby the Bank agreed to not exercise remedies and rights afforded it under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for thirty days. The thirty day period was to be used by the Company to pursue strategic alternatives.

 37

On April 28, 2016, the Bank informed the Company that it would extend the above Forbearance Agreement period to May 31, 2016 upon effecting a principal reduction of $125,000. In addition, the Company will receive an automatic extension to September 15, 2016 upon meeting certain terms and conditions specified by the Bank. On May 31, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to August 31, 2016. On July 29, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to October 1, 2016. 

On October 1, 2016, the Company and the Bank could not reach an agreement to extend the Third Amendment to the Forbearance Agreement. Following this outcome, the Company decided to discontinue payment of interest on its outstanding loan obligations with the Bank. The Company continued to evaluate plans to restructure, amend or refinance existing debt through private options.  

On February 10, 2017, the Company, TCB and IberiaBank (collectively, “Sellers”), and PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, and certain financial institutions (collectively, “Buyers”) entered into a Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”), pursuant to which Sellers sold to Buyers, and Buyers purchased from Sellers, all of Sellers’ right, title and interest in, to and under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $5,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price”), (ii) a Synthetic Equity Interest equal to 10% of the proceeds, after Buyer’s realization of a 150% return on the Cash Purchase Price within five (5) years of the closing date of the sale, with payment being distributed 65.78947368% to TCB and 34.21052632% to IberiaBank, and (iii) at any time prior to February 10, 2022, Buyer may acquire the interest in clause (ii) above. In connection with the LSA, the Company released Sellers and its successors as holders of the rights under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, including Buyers, from any and all claims under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents. 

Also on February 10, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries, and successor lender entered into a binding letter agreement dated February 10, 2017, which was subsequently amended on March 30, 2017 (as amended, the “letter agreement”) pursuant to which:focus:

 

1.1)Ag Solutions: Leveraging our reputation as one of the successor lender agreedleading technology solutions providers to forgive our existing secured loan in the approximate principal amountagriculture industry to increase market share through delivery of $17,295,000,best-in-class drones, sensors and in exchange entered into a secured promissory note (which we refer to as the “restated secured note”) in the original principal amount of $4,500,000.data analytics for hemp and other commercial crops;
   
2.we:
a.conveyed our oil and gas properties and associated performance and surety bonds in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska;
b.2)conveyed all of our shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (together (a)Drone Manufacturing: Establishing AgEagle as the dominant commercial drone design, engineering, manufacturing, assembly and (b),testing company in the conveyed oil and gas assets”);United States; and
   
c.3)retained our assets in Kansas and continuedDrone Solutions:Establishing the Company as a going concern. The Kansas assets currently provide mostone of our current operating revenue.the industry’s leading American-made trusted source for turnkey, end-to-end, tailored drone solutions to the world.

 

The restated secured note:We intend to grow our business by preserving a leadership position in our core Ag Solutions business; providing quality contract manufacturing, assembly and testing services; and innovating new customer-focused drone systems and solutions to capture significant share of the broader commercial drone market. In addition, we expect to accelerate our growth and expansion through strategic acquisitions of drone-related companies offering distinct technological and competitive advantages and have defensible IP protection in place, if applicable.

Key Growth Strategies

We intend to grow our business by achieving greater market penetration of the growing precision agriculture marketplace; by promoting our new service targeting the sustainable agriculture marketplace for the 2021 growing season; and by creating new, easier to use and higher value products that position AgEagle as a leading innovator and trusted solutions provider in high growth markets where advanced aerial imaging and data capture and analytics technologies can be used to achieve specific business and sustainability objectives. Currently, our management is actively exploring new vertical expansion opportunities in other industries outside of agriculture and its related areas, including drone-enabled package delivery. In addition to drone package deliveries, we believe that our solutions and services may also be well suited for use in decontamination, mapping and surveying, mining/resource exploration, insurance inspection and infrastructure/asset inspection, among other industrial applications.

Key components of our growth strategy include the following:

 

 a.Achieving greater market penetration of the U.S. industrial hemp industry by working to establish HempOverview and other related products and services as the gold industry standard for hemp cultivation oversight, compliance, enforcement and commerce. AgEagle is secured by a first-priority lien– and intends to remain – at the leading edge of leveraging best-in-class technology to provide turnkey solutions for state and tribal regulatory departments of agriculture, industrial hemp and hemp-derived CBD growers and processors. At this time, AgEagle believes that it is the only company in the Company’s oilnation with extensive experience in agriculture that is effectively addressing the emerging needs and gas producing assets situatedchallenges of the domestic hemp cultivation industry through the application of advanced technology – a key competitive differential that the Company hopes to continue capitalizing on in the State of Kansas,coming year.  
   
Deliver new and innovative solutions. AgEagle’s research and development efforts are the foundation of the Company, and we intend to continue investing in our own innovations, pioneering new and enhanced products and solutions that enable us to satisfy the Company’s customers – both in response to and in anticipation of their needs. AgEagle believes that by investing in research and development, the Company can be a leader in delivering innovative drone systems and solutions that address market needs within our current target markets, enabling us to create new opportunities for growth.

 b.evidences accrued interest onContinue to expand the $4,500,000 principal balance atAgEagle platform of drone systems and solutions into other industries beyond agriculture and commercial package delivery. The Company is actively pursuing opportunities outside of agriculture as we continue to expand and grow the AgEagle platform. We are confident in the UAV systems, services and solutions we offer today and believe that these systems, services and solutions could provide other drone industry sectors the same kind of optimization we are currently providing the agriculture industry. Expansion initiatives include the provision of quality contract manufacturing, design and engineering, assembly and testing of advanced drones and drone-related equipment, as well as turnkey drone solutions for the broader drone market.

Growth through acquisition. Through successful execution of our growth-through-acquisition strategies, we intend to acquire technologically-advanced drone-related companies and intellectual property that complement and strengthen our value proposition to the market. We believe that by investing in complementary acquisitions, we can accelerate our revenue growth and deliver a ratebroader array of 16% per annum,innovative drone systems and solutions that address specialized market needs within our current target markets and in emerging drone industry sectors.

Competitive Strengths

AgEagle believes the following attributes and capabilities provide us with long-term competitive advantages:

Proprietary technologies, in-house capabilities and industry experience - We believe our decade of experience in commercial drone design and engineering; in-house manufacturing, assembly and testing capabilities; and advanced technology development skillset serve to differentiate AgEagle in the marketplace. As of today, we develop and manufacture all the drone systems and solutions we produce in the United States, which allows us to avoid many of the potential difficulties that could arise if our engineering and manufacturing operations were otherwise located outside of the country. In addition, AgEagle is committed to meeting and exceeding quality and safety standards for manufacturing, assembly, design and engineering and testing of drones, drone subcomponents and related drone equipment in our Wichita-based manufacturing operations.
   
Advanced technology solutions allow users to remove the guesswork in effectively managing hemp cultivation oversight, compliance, enforcement, reporting and commerce - To our knowledge, there is no other SaaS solution available on the market today – particularly one that has been developed by a proven Agtech company with the level of experience and expertise of AgEagle – that provides the multi-faceted level of support and services that HempOverview offers to all stakeholders in the industry.
Increased margins for farmers - We believe our drones and drone solutions directly enhance margins for commercial farmers by reducing the amount of nutrients and chemicals needed to manage their farms. The software equipped on our UAVs deliver a high-quality aerial map upon completion of the flight, allowing the user to accurately identify the specific areas that are malnourished. This software is compatible with precision applicator tractors, which assist users in applying a precise amount of nutrients in only the areas it is needed. In addition, Our UAVs are specially designed to provide users with a portable and easy to operate device, which can be controlled with a hand-held unit or tablet. Through our FarmLens platform, users are able to plan and track an efficient flight path for their UAV. The UAVs are equipped with a camera and NIR filter whose images provide a holistic aerial view of the fields, along with meaningful data that is uploaded and delivered to the user within a very short time frame. As a result, this platform allows users to quickly detect any issues in their crops, which enables them to address such issues in a timely manner before any damage, or further damage, may affect their crops.

 c.bears interest fromExpertise in drone delivery – Since 2019, AgEagle has been actively engaged in the custom manufacturing and after May 1, 2017, atassembly of drones and drone equipment used for the testing and refining of a rateworld leading ecommerce company’s commercial drone small package delivery vehicles, systems and operations. As a result, we are uniquely positioned to collaborate with other organizations seeking to activate and accelerate adoption of 16.0% per annum,end-to-end drone delivery solutions to drive new and differentiated value creation in their business-to-business or business-to-consumer operations.
   
 d.Leading-edge research and delivery – In order to propel functional commercial applications of drone solutions in real world, real-time environments, and to best aid in the determination and ultimate adoption of a regulatory framework to guide and direct mainstream commercial use of drones beyond visual line of sight, AgEagle is pre-payablea lead participant in full at a discount at any time during the term of the restated secured note upon the Company paying $3,300,000 to successor lender, and
e.maturesFAA’s BEYOND program in Kansas and is due and payableactively engaged in fullpartnering with other leading drone solutions companies on November 1, 2017 (which date has been extended as discussed below).pilot projects with long-term commercial potential.

The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

So long as we repay the $3,300,000 in indebtedness on or prior to the maturity date, as extended, all other amounts payable under the restated secured note are to be forgiven.

The closing occurred on May 10, 2017. As part of the closing procedures and net settlement, we issued a promissory note to Pass Creek Resources LLC in the amount of $105,806. The promissory bears interest at 16% per annum and matured on June 9, 2017. The amount due was not paid on June 9, 2017, but the holder has not provided the Company a notice of default.

 

 3831

 

In connection with the May 10, 2017 closing and in considerationImpact of COVID-19 On Our Business Operations

The outbreak of the satisfaction of $13,425,000novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has evolved into a global pandemic. The coronavirus has spread to many regions of the amount due underworld, including the Credit Agreement, as amended,United States. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business and operating results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning COVID-19 and the Companyactions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

Should the coronavirus continue to spread, our business operations could be delayed or interrupted. For instance, we currently utilize third parties to, among other things, manufacture components and certain of its subsidiaries transferredparts for the proprietary and contracted drones we produce, and to PCR Holdings LLC, an affiliateperform quality testing. We also manufacture and assemble products and perform various services at our manufacturing facility. If either we or any third-parties in the supply chain for materials used in our manufacturing and assembly processes are adversely impacted by restrictions resulting from the coronavirus pandemic, our supply chain may be disrupted, limiting our ability to manufacture and assemble products.

The spread of the successor lenders undercoronavirus, which has caused a broad impact globally, including restrictions on travel and quarantine policies put into place by businesses and governments, may have a material economic effect on our business. While the Credit Agreement, allpotential economic impact brought on by and the duration of the Company’s oilpandemic may be difficult to assess or predict, it has already caused, and gas propertiesis likely to result in further, significant disruptions of global financial markets, which may reduce our future ability to access capital either at all or on favorable terms. In addition, a recession, depression or other sustained adverse market event resulting from the spread of the coronavirus could materially and assets located in Colorado, Texas,adversely affect our business and Nebraska, as well as the Company’s sharesvalue of Oakridge Energy, Inc.our Common Stock.

 

To evidenceThe ultimate impact of the Company’s remaining $4,500,000current pandemic, or any other health epidemic, is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do not yet know the full extent of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”),potential delays or impacts on our business or the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered intoglobal economy as a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), andwhole. However, these effects could have a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”),material impact on our operations in the amountfuture. We will continue to monitor the situation closely.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, in addition to complying with ’shelter at home’ mandates in those states affecting our employees, most of $3.3 million as described above. whom worked virtually from their homes, our supply chain was adversely impacted by the pandemic, causing material delays in the delivery of critical supply orders associated with timely fulfilling our obligations to our large ecommerce client. As a consequence, revenues originally expected to be reported in the second quarter 2020 were reported in the third quarter 2020 results.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our subsidiaries’ obligationsmanagement’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our most critical estimates include those related to revenue recognition, inventories and reserves for excess and obsolescence, accounting for stock-based awards, and income taxes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the credit agreementcircumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and noteliabilities that are non-recoursenot readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting estimates affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements. Please see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, which are secured by a first-priority lienincluded in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report, for our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. There have been no material changes made to the critical accounting estimates during the periods presented in the Company’sconsolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

 The majority of our revenue is generated pursuant to written contractual arrangements to develop, manufacture and/or modify complex drone related products, and its subsidiaries’ oil propertiesto provide associated engineering, technical and assets locatedother services according to customer specifications. These contracts are a fixed price and we account for all revenue contracts in Kansas. The Companyaccordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under fixed-price contracts, we agree to perform the specified work for a pre-determined price. To the extent our actual costs vary from the estimates upon which the price was removed asnegotiated, we will generate more or less profit or could incur a borrower underloss. We account for a contract after it has been approved by all parties to the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guarantyarrangement, the rights of Recourse Carveouts, pursuantthe parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.

Topic 606 requires revenue to be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the Company guarantees its subsidiaries’ payment of certain feesexpects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and expenses duerecognize revenue under the Credit Agreement,new standard as costs are incurred. Under previous U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), revenue was generally recognized when deliveries were made, performance milestones were attained, or as costs were incurred. The new standard accelerates the timing of when the revenue is recognized, however, it does not change the total amount of revenue recognized on our UAVS contracts. The new standard does not affect revenue recognition for purposes of our UAVS or software subscription sales as each of the Company’s revenue transactions represent a single performance obligation that is satisfied at a point in time or monthly subscription fees which are recognized ratably over the subscription period, as defined in the new ASU. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue for small UAS product contracts with customers at the point in time when the transfer of control passes to the customer, which is generally upon delivery.

Inventories and Reserve for Obsolescence

Our policy for valuation of inventory, including the determination of obsolete inventory, requires us to perform a detailed assessment of inventory at each balance sheet date, which includes a review of, among other factors, an estimate of future demand for products within specific time horizons, valuation of existing inventory, as well as product lifecycle and product development plans. Inventory reserves are also provided to cover risks arising from slow-moving items. We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated net realizable value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. We may be liablerequired to record additional inventory write-downs if actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by our management.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are recorded under the acquisition method of accounting at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying identifiable net assets of acquired businesses. Intangible assets from acquired businesses are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date and consist of customer programs, trademarks, customer relationships, technology and other intangible assets. Customer programs include values assigned to major programs of acquired businesses and represent the aggregate value associated with the customer relationships, contracts, technology and trademarks underlying the associated program and are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of expected cash flows used to measure fair value, which ranges from four to five years.

Our goodwill balance was $3.1 million at December 31, 2020 and $3.1 million at December 31, 2019. We perform an annual impairment test of our goodwill at least annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may be impaired. Such events or changes in circumstances may include a significant deterioration in overall economic conditions, changes in the business climate of our industry, a decline in our market capitalization, operating performance indicators, competition, reorganizations of our business. Our goodwill has been allocated to and is tested for certain conduct, suchimpairment at a level referred to as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence,the business segment. The level at which we test goodwill for impairment requires us to determine whether the operations below the business segment constitute a self-sustaining business for which discrete financial information is available and wastesegment management regularly reviews the operating results.

We use a quantitative approach when testing goodwill. To perform the quantitative impairment test, we compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the Kansas oil properties or assets.

On December 22, 2017,reporting unit is not impaired. If the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Datecarrying value of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provide notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice payreporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds its fair value, a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of First Amendment, Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advancesgoodwill impairment loss is recognized in an amount notequal to exceed $300,000.that excess. We generally estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis and market-based valuation methodologies such as comparable public company trading values and values observed in recent business acquisitions. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgments, including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, long-term growth rates, discount rates and relevant comparable public company earnings multiples and relevant transaction multiples. The Company has extendedcash flows employed in the restated secured noteDCF analysis are based on our best estimate of future sales, earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions, existing firm orders, expected future orders, changes in working capital, long term business plans and recent operating performance.

Finite-lived intangibles are amortized to March 23, 2018 and hasexpense over the optionapplicable useful lives, ranging from four to extendfive years, based on the maturity datenature of the restated secured noteasset and the underlying pattern of economic benefit as reflected by future net cash inflows. We perform an impairment test of finite-lived intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may be impaired. If events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of a finite-lived intangible may be impaired, the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to April 30, 2018, upon paymentresult from the use of the asset group would be compared to the asset group’s carrying value. If the asset group’s carrying amount exceed the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows, we would determine the fair value of the asset group and record an extension fee of $50,000.impairment loss in net earnings.

 

As of December 31, 2017,2020, and 2019, we performed our annual goodwill and finite-lived intangible assets impairment tests for our SaaS reporting unit. The results of that test indicated that for our SaaS reporting unit no impairment charges existed for the principal balancerecorded goodwill of $4,457,347 along with accrued interest$3.1M or the related finite-intangibles assets of $479,452 remained due under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Atapproximately $521K as of December 31, 2017, the Company was not in compliance with certain covenants, and the loan may be called due by Pass Creek.

2020. As of December 31, 2017,2019, the principal balanceresults of $80,805 along with accrued interestthe impairment test indicated that for our SaaS reporting unit an impairment existed for the recorded goodwill of $9,616 remained due under the promissory note with Pass Creek Resources LLC.  $3.3M but not for related finite-intangibles assets of approximately $521K, resulting in a partial impairment charge on our goodwill of approximately $163,000.

 

On July 14, 2017, July 28, 2017 and August 30, 2017, the Company entered into Secured Promissory Notes totaling $225,000 with Alpha Capital Anstalt, which have a maturity date of June 30, 2018, and accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The amount due under the notes is secured by a security interest, subordinate to certain other security interests of the Company, in substantially all of the Company's assets. The amount due under the notes is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at the option of Alpha Capital Anstalt, on identical terms as the outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (i.e., an initial conversion price of $0.30 per share, a 9.9% ownership limitation and certain anti-dilution rights, which currently result in a conversion price of $0.0612 per share). As of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $225,000 remained due.

Satisfaction of our cash obligations for the next 12 monthsShare-Based Compensation Awards

In conjunction with the anticipated merger, the Company will satisfy its long-term indebtedness with the sale of its assets to the existing lender and anticipates having sufficient liquidity post-merger to satisfy its other liabilities.

Summary of product research and development that we will perform for the term of our plan

We do not anticipate performing any significant product research and development under our plan of operation.

Expected purchase or sale of any significant equipment

In the event the merger is not consummated, we anticipate that we will purchase the necessary production and field service equipment required to produce oil and gas during our normal course of operations over the next 12 months.

Significant changes in the number of employees

We currently have one full-time employee. We use and will continue to use independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, particularly in the area of land services, reservoir engineering, and general and administrative functions. We believe that this use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to contain operating and general expenses, and capital costs.  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

 39

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our accounting policies and estimates that are critical to our business operations and understanding of our results of operations include those relating to our oil and gas properties, asset retirement obligations and the value of share-based payments. This is not a comprehensive list of all of the accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by U.S. GAAP, with no need for our judgment in the application. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. However, certain of our accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and we may use significant judgment in the application; as a result, they are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying those policies, we use our judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on historical experience, observation of trends in the industry, and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. For a more detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Oil and Gas Properties

We follow the full-cost method of accounting under which all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized. We also capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with our acquisition, exploration and development activities and do not include costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities.

Proved properties are amortized using the units of production method (UOP). Currently we only have operations in the Unites States of America. The UOP calculation multiplies the percentage of estimated proved reserves produced each quarter by the cost of these reserves. The amortization base in the UOP calculation includes the sum of proved property, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A), estimated future development costs (future costs to access and develop proved reserves) and asset retirement costs, less related salvage value.

The cost of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization calculation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to such properties or until development projects are placed into service. Geological and geophysical costs not associated with specific properties are recorded as proved property immediately. Unproved properties are reviewed for impairment quarterly.

Under the full cost method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is (a) the present value of future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil & gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil & gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of 10 percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditionsplus (b) the cost of properties not being amortizedplus (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortizedless (d) income tax effects related to differences between book and tax basis of properties. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an unweighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.

Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional DD&A in the statement of operations. The ceiling calculation is performed quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2016, impairment charges of $8,032,670 were recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.

Proceeds from the sale or disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction to capitalized costs unless a significant portion (greater than 25%) of our reserve quantities are sold, in which case a gain or loss is recognized in income.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The asset retirement obligation relates to the plug and abandonment costs when our wells are no longer useful. We determine the value of the liability by obtaining quotes for this service and estimate the increase we will face in the future. We then discount the future value based on an intrinsic interest rate that is appropriate for us. If costs rise more than what we have expected there could be additional charges in the future however we monitor the costs of the abandoned wells and we will adjust this liability if necessary.

Share-Based Payments

 

The value we assign to the options and warrants that we issue is based on the fair market value as calculated by the Black-Scholes pricing model. To perform a calculation of the value of our options, and warrants, we determine an estimate of the volatility of our stock. We need to estimate volatility because there has not been enough trading of our stock to determine an appropriate measure of volatility. We believe our estimate of volatility is reasonable, and we review the assumptions used to determine this whenever we issue a new equity instruments. If we have a material error in our estimate of the volatility of our stock, our expenses could be understated or overstated. All share-based awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options.

 

 40

Income Taxes

Recent Issued Accounting Standards

We are required to estimate our income taxes, which includes estimating our current income taxes as well as measuring the temporary differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. We currently have significant deferred assets, which are subject to periodic recoverability assessments. Realizing our deferred tax assets principally depends on our achieving projected future taxable income. We may change our judgments regarding future profitability due to future market conditions and other factors, which may result in recording a valuation allowance against those deferred tax assets.

 

See Note 1, SummaryResults of Significant Accounting Policies – Recent Issued Accounting Standards,Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2020 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded revenues of $1,285,383 compared to revenues of $296,677 for the same period in 2019, a 333% increase. The increase was mainly due to new revenues derived from purchase orders to manufacture and assemble drones and related delivery products designed to meet specific criteria for package delivery in urban and suburban area. Revenue growth was also positively impacted by the continued focus on expansion of our platform, providing aerial imaging and analytics solutions which serve new and emerging markets including registration, oversight, and compliance of hemp fields by state departments of agriculture.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, cost of sales totaled $711,650, a $509,601, or 252%, increase when compared to $202,049 in the year ended December 31, 2019. We had a gross profit of $573,733, or 45% gross profit margin, during the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to $94,628, or 32% gross profit margin, for the year ended December 31, 2019. The primary factors contributing to the increase in our cost of sales and gross profit margin was due to the continued shift in mix of products and services we now offer customers in the new markets we serve that have resulted in higher margin for our sales.

We recorded total operating expenses of $5,505,040 during 2020, a 110% increase as compared to operating expenses of $2,616,821 in the same period of 2019. Our operating expenses are comprised of general and administrative expenses, professional fees, and selling expenses. General and administrative expenses totaled $2,732,274 in 2020 compared to $1,850,225 in 2019, an increase of 48%. The increase was primarily due to recruiting fees associated with the search for new CEO, costs for public relations services, payments to directors as compensation fees, additional payroll and bonus payments associated with new hires and existing employees, stock compensation expenses, and added annual shareholder meeting costs. Professional fees also increased 308% as we had $2,703,371 of expenses for the current period versus $662,633 in the comparable prior period. The increase was mainly due to additional consulting service fees related to additional operational and business development consultants required to expand our growth opportunities, fractional CTO services, along with incremental legal expenses mainly associated with our capital raising activities and an estimated contingent liability accrual associated with a consultant agreement. Also included in operating expenses was selling costs that decreased 38% to $40,003 versus $65,015 in the prior year’s comparable period due to less travel and conference expenses for the purposes of new business development as a result of COVID-19. Lastly, we recorded $29,392 and $38,498 related to research and development expenses during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Other income (expenses) for the year ended December 31, 2020 was ($594) as we recorded a loss on disposal of fixed assets due to our consolidated financial statementsmoving to Wichita. There was no other income (expenses) recorded for the comparable period during 2019.

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $549 related to the Paycheck Protection Plan (PPP) loan as compared to $501 in the prior year related to a promissory note that was repaid in March 2019.

Our net loss was $4,932,450 in 2020. This represents a $2,409,756 increase over our net loss of $2,522,694 in 2019. Overall, the increase in net loss is due to greater operating costs which includes additional general and administrative costs along with added professional expenses as a result of the shift in our sales and long-term growth strategies that required increase business development resources, offset by approximately $163,000 charge of a goodwill impairment that occurred in 2019. We are in the process of continuing to address these shifts by developing new platforms, products and services that support prevailing growth opportunities in domestic industrial hemp and sustainable agriculture and growing our drone-enabled package delivery business.

For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, our net loss available to Common Stockholders was $14,043,777 and $2,684,916, respectively an increase of $11,358,861. The increase is due to non-cash charges stemming from required deemed dividend accounting for modifications to certain preferred stock, redemption of preferred stock and the trigger of Down Round provisions on certain preferred stock and warrants.

Cash Flows

December 31, 2020 As Compared to December 31, 2019

Cash on hand was $23,940,333 on December 31, 2020, an increase of $23,222,336 compared to the $717,997 on hand at December 31, 2019. Cash used in operations for 2020 was $2,256,571 compared to $1,818,290 of cash used by operations for 2019. The increase in cash used in operating activities was driven largely decrease in deferred revenue offset by an increase mainly in accounts payables and accrued expenses related to purchases of inventories and payments for professional services and other costs associated the growth of the business.

Cash used by investing activities during 2020 was $779,023compared to $24,445 in 2019. The increase in cash used in our investing activities resulted from the addition of note receivable agreements executed for the purposes of a strategic partnership and a letter of intent associated with an acquisition. In addition, we made purchases of property and equipment and building improvements related to the new leased warehouse and corporate offices along with recording capitalized costs associated with the development of the HempOverview platform.

Cash provided in financing activities during the 12 months ended December 31, 2020 was $26,257,930 compared to cash used in financing activities of $40,998 as of December 31, 2019. The increase in cash provided by our financing activities was due to sales of our Preferred Stock, Common Stock, warrants, and promissory note proceeds as part of Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act’s Paycheck Protection Plan (PPP).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2020, we had working capital of $22,615,624 and a loss from operations of $4,932,450 for the period then ended. While there can be no guarantees, we believe cash on hand, in connection with cash generated from revenue, will be sufficient to fund the next year of operations. In addition, we intend to pursue other opportunities of raising capital with outside investors.

On April 7, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with, an existing an institutional investor and shareholder of the Company (the “Investor”), pursuant to which the Board of Directors of the Company authorized 1,050 shares of a newly designated series of preferred stock, the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock was convertible at $0.25 per share into an aggregate of 4,200,000 shares of the Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share. The purchase price for the Preferred Stock was $1,050,000 of which we received net proceeds of $1,010,000.

On May 11, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with an Investor pursuant to which we agreed to sell to the Investor (in a registered direct offering) 2,400,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001, and pre-funded warrants (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase up to 3,260,377 shares of Common Stock, for gross proceeds of approximately $6 million and net proceeds of $5,950,010 after issuance costs. The purchase price for each share of Common Stock was $1.06 and the purchase price for each Pre-Funded Warrant was $1.05999. The exercise price for each Warrant was $0.001. Net proceeds from the sale were used to repurchase 262 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock, convertible into 1,048,000 shares of Common Stock currently held by the Investor at a repurchase price of $1.06 per share of Common Stock.

On June 24, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with an Investor pursuant to which we agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering 4,407,400 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001, pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 1,956,236 shares of Common Stock, and warrants to purchase up to 2,455,476 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.35 per share (the “Warrants”), for gross proceeds of $7 million (which included subsequent payment of the exercise price of the Pre-Funded Warrants in this report.the amount of $1,956.24. Upon exercise of the Warrants in full by the Investor, we received additional gross proceeds of $3,314,892. The shares of Common Stock underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants and the Warrants are referred to as “Warrant Shares.” The purchase price for each share of Common Stock is $1.10 and the purchase price for each Pre-Funded Warrant is $1.099. The exercise price for each Pre-Funded Warrant is $0.001. As of December 31, 2020, all the Warrant Shares were fully exercised.

On August 4, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with an Investor, pursuant to which we agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering 3,335,705 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001, and warrants to purchase up to 2,516,778 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.30 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $10 million. Upon exercise of the Warrants in full by the Investor, we would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $8,305,367. The purchase price for each share of Common Stock was $2.98. Common Stock

 

EffectsOn December 31, 2020, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with an Investor, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering Pre-Funded Warrants to purchase up to 1,057,214 shares of Inflation and PricingCommon Stock, par value $0.001 (“Common Stock”), for gross proceeds of approximately $6.375 million (which includes subsequent payment of the exercise price of the Pre-Funded Warrants in the amount of $1,057.21). The shares of Common Stock underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants are referred to as the “Warrant Shares.” The purchase price for each Pre-Funded Warrant is $6.029. The exercise price for each Pre-Funded Warrant is $0.001.

 

The oilCompany has continued to realize losses from operations. However, as a result of our capital raise efforts, we believe we will have sufficient cash to meet our anticipated operating costs and gas industrycapital expenditure requirements through December 2022. Our primary need for liquidity is very cyclicalto fund working capital requirements of our business, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service, and for general corporate purposes. Our primary source of liquidity is funds generated by financing activities and from private placements. Our ability to fund our operations, to make planned capital expenditures, to make planned acquisitions, to make scheduled debt payments, and to repay or refinance indebtedness depends on our future operating performance and cash flows, which are subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

If the Company is unable to generate significant sales growth in the near term and raise additional capital, there is a risk that the Company could default on additional obligations; and could be required to discontinue or significantly reduce the scope of its operations if no other means of financing operations are available. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities or any other adjustment that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

On December 31, 2020, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. Since our inception, except for standard operating leases, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities. We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Contractual Obligations

Operating Leases

The Company leases office space located at 8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas 67226. The Company leases a building located at 8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas 67226, which serves as our corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility. The commencement date of the lease was November 1, 2020 and will expire on October 31, 2023, unless sooner terminated or extended. The aggregate estimated rent payments due over the initial three-year term is $297,000. The landlord may grant the Company the option to extend the term for an additional thirty-six months. The aggregate estimated rent payments due over the option term would be $314,640 and the demandright of use asset is $257,363 as of December 31, 2020.

GreenBlock Capital LLC Consulting Agreement

On May 3, 2019, we entered into a consulting agreement with GreenBlock Capital LLC (“Consultant”) to serve as strategic advisor and consultant with respect to the development of new business opportunities and the implementation of business strategies related to expansion into the emerging domestic hemp cultivation market. The extent of the services will be set forth in separate scopes of work, from time to time, to be prepared and mutually agreed to by the parties. As compensation for goodsthe services under the terms of the agreement, the Consultant can receive (i) $25,000 per month during the term of the agreement, (ii) 500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock upon execution of the agreement and up to (iii) up to 2,500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock upon the achievement of predetermined milestones.

On October 31, 2019, the consulting agreement was terminated as a result of the Company no longer needing these services to be provided by an outside consultant. There are no early termination penalties incurred as a result of oilthe termination of the consulting agreement. The Consultant may still be entitled to receive up to 2,500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock after termination of the Agreement, if the achievement of milestones that commenced during the term of the Agreement are completed after termination.

On November 12, 2019, we announced that the Florida Department of Agriculture and gas field companies, suppliersConsumer Services (FDACS) had chosen our HempOverview software-as-a-solution (SaaS) platform to manage the online application submission and others associatedregistration process for hemp growers and their farms and hemp fields for the 2020, 2021 and 2022 planting seasons (the “Florida Contract”). Prior to the termination of the Agreement with the industry puts extreme pressureConsultant, as part of the Consultant’s services, Consultant introduced us to the FDACS, which introduction resulted in us signing the Florida Contract. Since the Consultant was instrumental in identifying and introducing us to FDACS prior to termination of the Agreement, the execution of the Florida Contract is a milestone achieved by the Consultant under the terms of the Agreement. Upon the receipt of our executed purchase from FDACS, the Company will issue 250,000 of the shares of Common Stock to the Consultant. The Consultant may be entitled to receive up to another 750,000 shares of Common Stock, which will be contingent upon further milestones to be achieved under the Florida Contract.

On June 30, 2020, the Company issued an additional 250,000 shares of its Common Stock to the Consultant as part of its compensation for services. The Company recognized a total of $297,500 of expense at a fair value of $1.19 per share within professional fees related to these issuances.

Inflation

Our opinion is that inflation has not had, and is not expected to have, a material effect on our operations.

Climate Change

Our opinion is that neither climate change, nor governmental regulations related to climate change, have had, or are expected to have, any material effect on our operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

There were various updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to a have a material impact on the economic stability and pricing structure within the industry. Material changes in prices impact revenue stream, estimatesCompany’s consolidated financial position, results of future reserves, borrowing base calculations of bank loans and value of properties in purchase and sale transactions. Material changes in prices can impact the value of oil and gas companies and their ability to raise capital, borrow money and retain personnel. We anticipate business costs and the demand for services related to production and exploration will fluctuate while the commodity price for oil and gas remains volatile.operations or cash flows.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information required by this Item.

 

Not applicable.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Management Responsibility for Financial Information

We are responsible for the preparation, integrity and fair presentation of ourOur financial statements andare contained in pages F-1 through F-33, which appear at the other information that appears inend of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

On December 11, 2020, we dismissed D. Brooks & Associates CPAs (“D.Brooks”) as our independent registered public accountants and engaged WithumSmith+Brown, PC (“Withum”) as its independent registered public accountants. The engagement of Withum has been approved by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. D. Brooks’s reports on our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordanceas of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and through December 11, 2020, there were no disagreements with D.Brooks on any matter of accounting principles generally acceptedor practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which if not resolved to D. Brooks satisfaction would have caused it to make reference thereto in connection with its reports on the United Statesconsolidated financial statements for such years. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and include estimates based on our best judgment.2018 and through December 11, 2020, there were no “reportable events” of the type described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

 

We maintain a comprehensive system of internal controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance, at an appropriate cost-benefit relationship, thatengaged Withum as our financial information is accurate and reliable, our assets are safeguarded and our transactions are executed in accordance with established procedures.  

RBSM LLP, annew independent registered public accounting firm is retainedeffective upon the termination of D. Brooks. The retention of Withum was approved by the Audit Committee. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and through December 11, 2020, we did not consult with Withum with respect to any matter whatsoever including without limitation with respect to any of (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our consolidated financial statements. Its accompanying report is based on audits conductedstatements; or (iii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in accordance with the standardsItem 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) or an event of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).type described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

 

Our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, and other information required by this Item 8 are included in this report beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Control Procedures

 

Our InterimThe Company’s Chief Executive Officer Louis G. Schott, and our Interimthe Company’s Chief Financial Officer Robert Schleizer, evaluated the effectiveness of ourthe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Report pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based on the evaluation, Mr. SchottDecember 31, 2020 and Mr. Schleizer concluded that ourthe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective. The term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated, recorded, processed, summarized and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure to be reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

OurThe Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, as is defined in RulesRule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) ofunder the Exchange Act. TheseThe Company’s internal controls arecontrol over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance thatregarding the reportedreliability of financial information is presented fairly, that disclosures are adequatereporting and that the judgments inherent in the preparation of financial statements are reasonable. There arein accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).

Because of its inherent limitations, in the effectiveness of anya system of internal control includingover financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance of such reliability and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the possibilityrisk that controls may become inadequate because of human error and overridingchanges in conditions, or that the degree of controls. Consequently, an effective internal control system can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance,compliance with respect to reporting financial information. the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 41

 

Management has conducted, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, an evaluationassessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting used the criteria set forth in SEC Release 33-8810 based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control over Financial Reporting — Guidance for Smaller Public Companies. Based on this evaluation, managementManagement concluded that our system of internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2017. Such conclusion reflects the termination2020, based on these criteria.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our financial reporting staff during 2017. Until we are able to remedy these weaknesses, we are relying on third party consultants to assist withindependent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As a smaller reporting company, our management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only the management’s report.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Effective August 17, 2017, Robert Schleizer was appointed as Interim Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting/financial officer of the Company. He replaced Douglas M. Wright who resigned to pursue other business opportunities.

Other than the above, thereThere were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, that occurredas defined in Rules 13a-15(t) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recent fiscal quarterthe year ended December 31, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.   

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table and biographical summaries set forth information, including principal occupation and business experience about our directors and executive officers:

NameAgeOther positions with the Company; other directorships held in last five yearsHas served as a part of the Company since
Barrett Mooney36Chairman of the Board & Former Chief Executive OfficerJuly 2018
J. Michael Drozd54Chief Executive OfficerMay 2020
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern48Chief Financial Officer, EVP of Operations & SecretaryApril 2016
Grant Begley(1)(2)(3)67DirectorJune 2016
Louisa Ingargiola(1)(2)(3)53DirectorNovember 2018
Thomas Gardner(1)(2)(3)45DirectorJune 2016

(1)Member of the audit committee.
(2)Member of the compensation committee.
(3)Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

Barrett Mooney. Mr. Mooney was appointed to the Board as its Chairman in May 2020. Previously, Mr. Mooney served as Chief Executive Officer from July 2018 through May 2020. Mr. Mooney brings an extensive track record of growing agriculture and sustainability businesses. From May 2017 to July 2018, he served as Group Product Lead for The Climate Corporation, a subsidiary of Monsanto (recently acquired by Bayer), where he led the satellite imagery team, managed a team focused on using artificial intelligence to enhance crop yield production, and introduced a new organizational structure to improve sales efficiency. Prior to The Climate Corporation, from July 1, 2012 to May 1, 2017, Mr. Mooney co-founded and was CEO and president of HydroBio, a software company that used satellite-driven image analytics to conserve water and maximize crop yields. In May 2017, he sold HydroBio to The Climate Corporation. Mr. Mooney holds a Doctor of Philosophy in Agricultural and Biological Engineering from the University of Florida. He is also a member of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.

J. Michael Drozd. Mr. Drodz was appointed as AgEagle’s new Chief Executive Officer in May 2020. Prior to joining AgEagle, he was recruited by a Denver-based private equity group to serve as the CEO of Hemp Companies (renamed RYTE). From 2015 through 2019, Mr. Drozd served as President of Eurofins AgBio Division, a global business focused primarily on testing for the agriculture sector (seeds, plants and animals) with an emphasis on genetic analyses. From 2014 until his recruitment to Eurofins, he was Chief Operating Officer at Arbiom, a French biotechnology company where he restructured the organization, materially increased overall efficiency and improved resource allocations through numerous initiatives. As President and CEO of Aseptia/Wright Foods from 2011 through 2014, Mr. Drozd was credited for growing revenues from $210,000 to over $20 million in just over three years. The company achieved the distinction of being named the fastest growing food company in the U.S. on Inc. 500. In addition, he closed $500 million in customer contracts, including Fortune 500 companies; and negotiated over $81 million in financing transactions.

Earlier in his career, Mr. Drozd served as Executive Vice President of CoalTek, a clean tech energy company that he scaled into the largest clean coal processing enterprise in the nation. He also served as President and CEO of Industrial Microwave Systems. Prior to Industrial Microwave Systems, Mr. Drozd was an Associate at Decision Focus Inc., a management consulting firm which focused on logistics and yield management systems. In this role, he designed, implemented and managed the forecasting and yield management system for a major logistics company.

Mr. Drozd received dual Bachelor of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering and Economics from Duke University in 1989 as an AB Duke and General Motors Scholar. He earned his Master’s in Optical Engineering from Cambridge University (England) attending as a Churchill Scholar. He also received a Masters’ degree in Engineering-Economic Systems (Business / Engineering Management) from Stanford University and was a National Science Fellow. He received his Ph.D. from Duke University in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 1997.

Nicole Fernandez-McGovern, CPA. Since August 2016, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern has served as AgEagle’s Chief Financial Officer, charged with overseeing the Company’s global financial operations to include managing financial planning, general tax and accounting activities, capital formation, SEC reporting and other key financial duties. Prior to joining AgEagle, she served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Trunity Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded education technology company. While at Trunity, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern led the successful restructuring of the Company by acquiring a new compounding pharmacy business and finalizing the spin-out of the legacy education business into a newly formed private company. In 2011, she began RCM Financial Consulting, where she serves as President. The firm is specialized consulting firm focused on providing interim accounting and financial services to small and medium sized businesses along with financial advisory services. During the preceding ten years, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern was a financial manager at Elizabeth Arden where she was involved with all aspects of the Nasdaq-listed company’s SEC and financial reporting processes. She launched her professional career at KPMG, LLP in its audit and assurance practice, where she managed various large -scale engagements for both public and privately held companies.

Ms. Fernandez-McGovern earned a Master of Business Administration degree with concentration in Accounting and International Business and a Bachelor of Business Administration degree with concentration in Accounting, both from the University of Miami. In addition to being fluent in Spanish, she is also a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Florida and serves on the boards of the South Florida Chapter of Financial Executives International and Pembroke Pines Charter Schools.

Grant Begley. Mr. Begley has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since June 2016. Since July 2011, Mr. Begley has served as President of Concepts to Capabilities Consulting LLC, which advises global executive clients on competitive positioning and performance in aerospace. From August 2010 to September 2011, Mr. Begley was Corporate Senior Vice President for Alion Science and Technology. Prior to Alion, Mr. Begley served as Pentagon Senior Advisor to the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, for Unmanned Systems, advising on critical issues and leading development of DoD’s 2011 Unmanned Systems Roadmap. Mr. Begley’s career includes defense industry leadership positions for the development of advanced capabilities with Raytheon and Lockheed Martin where he initiated and led cross-corporation unmanned systems and robotics successes. Mr. Begley served in the United States Navy for 26 years, where his duties included operational assignments flying fighter aircraft, designated Top Gun, followed by acquisition assignments for the development and management of next generation manned and unmanned aircraft systems, weapon systems and joint executive acquisition assignments.

Mr. Begley holds Masters’ degrees in Aerospace and Aeronautic Engineering from the Naval Post-Graduate School and a Bachelor’s degree in General Engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy. The Company believes that Mr. Begley’s 20 plus years of experience as a UAV industry expert, focused on UAV technologies, regulations and commercial applications, will be an invaluable resource to the Board of Directors.

Louisa Ingargiola. Ms. Ingargiola has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since November 2018. In 1990, Ms. Ingargiola joined Boston Capital Partners as an Investment Advisor in their Limited Partnership Division. In this capacity, she worked with investors and partners to report investment results, file tax forms, and recommend investments. In 1992, Ms. Ingargiola joined MetLife Insurance Company as a Budget and Expense Manager. In this capacity she managed a $30 million annual budget. Her responsibilities included budget implementation, expense and variance analysis and financial reporting. From 2007 through 2016, Ms. Ingargiola served as the Chief Financial Officer at MagneGas Corporation (NASDAQ: MNGA) and continues to serve as a director. Ms. Ingargiola currently serves as Chief Financial Officer of Avalon-Globocare (NASDAQ:AVCO) and as the Audit Committee Chair of FTE Networks, Inc. (NYSE:FTNW) and Electra Meccanica (NASDAQ:SOLO) where she has helped manage over $200 Million in equity and debt financing. Ms. Ingargiola also serves as a Director of The JBF Foundation Worldwide, a 501(c)(3) non-profit. Ms. Ingargiola graduated in 1989 from Boston University with a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration and a concentration in Finance. In 1996, she received her MBA in Health Administration from the University of South Florida.

Thomas Gardner. Mr. Gardner has served as a member of the Board of Directors since June 2016 and he and his firm has been engaged as a consultant to the Company. Since May 2010, Mr. Gardner has served as COO and Director at NeuEon, Inc., a technology advisory consulting firm, where he oversees operations and provides strategic technology and business guidance to select clients. Mr. Gardner has extensive experience in the areas of business and technology leadership across many industries, including financial services, manufacturing, telecommunications and consumer goods. Within these sectors, Mr. Gardner has specific expertise in the areas of process improvement, digitization and standardization, mergers and acquisitions, system implementations, enterprise resource planning and work-force optimization. Mr. Gardner holds a dual Bachelor of Science in Accounting and Management from Bryant University. The Company believes that Mr. Gardner’s experience as a data analytics expert, along with his strategic technology and business expertise, brings a unique perspective to the Board of Directors.

Board of Directors’ Term of Office

Directors are elected at our annual meeting of shareholders and serve for one year until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among the officers and directors, nor are there any arrangements or understanding between any of the Directors or Officers of our Company or any other person pursuant to which any Officer or Director was or is to be selected as an officer or director.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

During the last ten years, none of our officers, directors, promoters or control persons have been involved in any legal proceedings as described in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K.

Board Meetings; Committee Meetings; and Annual Meeting Attendance

In 2020, the Board of Directors held 18 meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on various matters. We encourage each director to attend our annual meeting of shareholders in person or by telephone conference call. All of the board members attended the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders via teleconference.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has standing audit, compensation and nominating committees, comprised solely of independent directors. Each committee has a charter, which is available at the Company’s website, www.ageagle.com. Each committee member is independent under NYSE American committee independence requirements applicable to the committee on which such member serves.

Audit Committee

We have a separately-designated standing Audit Committee, established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent auditors, and the Company’s internal financial and accounting controls. The Audit Committee has direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention (including termination) and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors, and the Company’s independent auditors report directly to the Audit Committee. During 2020, the Audit Committee had a total of four meetings.

The members of the Audit Committee are Louisa Ingargiola, Chair, Grant Begley, and Thomas Gardner. Each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an independent director under the corporate governance standards of the NYSE American and the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has determined that Louisa Ingargiola qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is currently defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and meets the financial sophistication requirements of the NYSE American. For information about Ms. Ingargiola’s relevant experience that qualifies her to be an audit committee financial expert, please see her biography above.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee approves the compensation objectives for the Company, approves the compensation of the chief executive officer and approves or recommends to the Board of Directors for approval the compensation of other executives. The Compensation Committee reviews all compensation components, including base salary, bonus, benefits and other perquisites.

The members of the Compensation Committee are Grant Begley, Chairman, Louisa Ingargiola, and Thomas Gardner. Each member of the compensation committee is a non-employee director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act, each is an outside director as defined by Section 162(m) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and each is an independent director as defined by the NYSE American. The compensation committee has adopted a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and the NYSE American, which is available on our website. During 2020, the Compensation Committee had a total of four meetings.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for making recommendations to our board of directors regarding candidates for directorships and the structure and composition of our board and the board committees. In addition, the nominating and corporate governance committee will be responsible for developing and recommending to our board corporate governance guidelines applicable to the company and advising our board on corporate governance matters. During 2020, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee had no meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on one occasion.

The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Thomas Gardner, Chairman, Louisa Ingargiola, and Grant Begley. Each member of the nominating and corporate governance committee will be an independent director as defined by the NYSE American. The nominating and corporate governance committee has adopted a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the NYSE American, which is available on our website.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by security holders. Potential nominees to the Board of Directors are required to have such experience in business or financial matters as would make such nominee an asset to the Board of Directors and may, under certain circumstances, be required to be “independent”, as such term is defined under Section 121(a) of the listing standards of NYSE American and applicable SEC regulations. Security holders wishing to submit the name of a person as a potential nominee to the Board of Directors must send the name, address, and a brief (no more than 500 words) biographical description of such potential nominee to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at the following address: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, c/o AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., 8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas 67226. Potential director nominees will be evaluated by personal interview, such interview to be conducted by one or more members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and/or any other method the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee deems appropriate, which may, but need not, include a questionnaire. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may solicit or receive information concerning potential nominees from any source it deems appropriate. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee need not engage in an evaluation process unless (i) there is a vacancy on the Board of Directors, (ii) a director is not standing for re-election, or (iii) the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not intend to recommend the nomination of a sitting director for re-election. A potential director nominee recommended by a security holder will not be evaluated differently from any other potential nominee. Although it has not done so in the past, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may retain search firms to assist in identifying suitable director candidates.

The Board does not have a formal policy on Board candidate qualifications. The Board may consider those factors it deems appropriate in evaluating director nominees made either by the Board or stockholders, including judgment, skill, strength of character, experience with businesses and organizations comparable in size or scope to the Company, experience and skill relative to other Board members, and specialized knowledge or experience. Depending upon the current needs of the Board, certain factors may be weighed more or less heavily. In considering candidates for the Board, the directors evaluate the entirety of each candidate’s credentials and do not have any specific minimum qualifications that must be met. The directors will consider candidates from any reasonable source, including current Board members, stockholders, professional search firms or other persons. The directors will not evaluate candidates differently based on who has made the recommendation.

Changes in Nominating Process

In 2020, there were no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, officers and stockholders who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of equity securities of the Company registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, collectively referred to herein as the “Reporting Persons,” to file initial statements of beneficial ownership of securities and statements of changes in beneficial ownership of securities with respect to the Company’s equity securities with the SEC. All Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all reports that such Reporting Persons file with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely on our review of the copies of such reports and upon written representations of the Reporting Persons received by us, we believe that the following Reporting Persons have not timely complied with the Section 16(a) filing requirements:

NameLate ReportsTransactions CoveredNumber of Shares
Barrett MooneyForm 4Acquisition of Stock Options25,000
Michael DrozdForm 4Acquisition of Stock Options140,000
Thomas GardnerForm 4Acquisition of Stock Options25,000
Louisa IngargiolaForm 4Acquisition of Stock Options25,000
Nicole Fernandez-McGovernForm 4Acquisition of Stock Options140,000

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for adherence by its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to ensure honest and ethical conduct; full, fair and proper disclosure of financial information in the Company’s periodic reports filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Any person may obtain a copy of our Code of Ethics, without charge, by mailing a request to the Company at the address appearing on the front page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or by viewing it on our website found at www.ageagle.com.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth compensation information for services rendered by certain of our executive officers in all capacities during the last two completed fiscal years. The following information includes the dollar value of base salaries and certain other compensation, if any, whether paid or deferred.

Summary Compensation Table

Name & Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Stock Awards(2) Option Awards(3) All Other Compensation(5) Total
Barrett Mooney (1)  2020  $57,539  $  $35,000  $128,338  $66,500  $287,377 
Chairman of the Board & Former Chief Executive Officer  2019  $220,000  $12,000  $  $99,547  $  $331,547 
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern  2020  $206,692  $75,000  $24,500  $522,928  $  $829,120 
Chief Financial Officer & EVP of Operations  2019  $180,000  $7,000  $  $84,640  $  $271,640 
J. Michael Drozd (4))  2020  $148,231  $12,000  $134,000  $420,465  $  $714,696 
Chief Executive Officer  2019  $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Bret Chilcott (6)  2020  $141,077  $  $  $  $  $141,077 
Former Chairman of the Board, Former President and Former Secretary  2019  $140,000  $  $  $  $  $140,000 

(1)Barrett Mooney was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective July 18, 2018; and resigned from the position in May 2020. Simultaneous with his stepping down as CEO, Mr. Mooney was appointed as the new Chairman of the Board, replacing Mr. Chilcott.
(2)Represents restricted stock units granted to Mr. Drozd, Mr. Mooney, and Ms. Fernandez-McGovern.
(3)The aggregate grant date fair value of the options awarded to each executive officer is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and excludes the effect of forfeiture assumptions. Also, these awards generally vest over a one period from the date of grant. The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of stock option awards are Black-Scholes option valuation model.
(4)J. Michael Drozd joined AgEagle in May 2020 upon his appointment as the Company’s new Chief Executive Officer, replacing Mr. Mooney.
(5)Represents consulting fees paid to Mr. Mooney following his resignation as Chief Executive Officer effective May 2020. Mr. Mooney agreed to provide consulting services to the Company, as needed, at a fixed fee of $4,500 per month on a month-to-month basis, plus reimbursement for travel expenses. On July 20, 2020, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, increased Mr. Mooney’s monthly fee for consulting services to $10,000 from $4,500 per month, which commenced on August 1, 2020 and ending on November 30, 2020.
(6)Bret Chilcott served as our Chairman of the Board and President in 2019 but resigned as an officer and director in May 2020.

 4245

 

Employment Agreements

Barrett Mooney

Pursuant to an employment offer letter dated July 9, 2018, Mr. Mooney received compensation for his services as Chief Executive Officer a base salary of $220,000 per year, which was subject to annual performance review by the Compensation Committee of the Board and could be revised by the Board, in its sole discretion. Mr. Mooney received an initial grant of 75,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company which is fully vested. Mr. Mooney was also eligible to receive an award of 75,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company which was eligible for full vesting on January 1, 2019 if, and only if, the stock price of the Company reached $3.55 per share and the closing price per share was at or above such price at the end of the day on January 1, 2019. In addition, Mr. Mooney was eligible to receive an award of 20,000 nonqualified stock options under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) upon securing one sustainability pilot program on or before October 31, 2018, and an additional award of 30,000 nonqualified stock options under the Equity Plan upon securing a second sustainability pilot program on or before January 31, 2019. Both awards provided for immediate vesting and exercisability at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s shares of Common Stock underlying the options as of the date of grant. Mr. Mooney was also eligible to receive an award of up to 55,000 Non-qualified Stock Options under the Equity Plan based upon the results of his annual performance review in the first quarter of 2019.

Effective December 18, 2018, an amendment was signed for the original employment offer letter dated July 9, 2018, thereby providing an amendment to provide that in lieu of the issuance of 75,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company (the “Shares”), the Company awarded Mr. Mooney 125,000 Non-qualified Stock Options (the “Stock Options”) under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”). The Stock Options are subject to the terms of the Equity Plan and standard option award agreement which shall have a term of 10 years and provide for vesting over a one-year period and exercisability at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock as of the date of the grant. The award of 75,000 shares were returned to the Company and immediately cancelled.

On September 30, 2019, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee approved a new compensatory arrangement for Mr. Mooney. Commencing on September 30, 2019, Mr. Mooney received quarterly awards of stock options to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock under the Company’s current shareholder approved equity incentive plan. The exercise price at the time of the awards were based on the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the NYSE American on the date of grant. The options were issued quarterly for a period of two years, vested in equal amounts over a two-year term from the date of grant, and are exercisable for a period of five years from date of grant. Mr. Mooney was also entitled to receive bonuses up to $48,000 in cash, 250,000 shares of restricted stock and 225,000 stock options upon the achievement of certain Company operational milestones. The foregoing compensation arrangements were in addition to the compensation received by Mr. Mooney under his employment agreement.

On March 6, 2020, Mr. Mooney resigned as Chief Executive of the Company. The Board of Directors and Mr. Mooney reached a mutual agreement that he would continue in his role as Chief Executive Officer for an additional sixty (60) days through May 5, 2020 during which time the Company initiated and completed an executive search for his replacement. It was also agreed that Mr. Mooney would continue with the Company in the role as Chairman of the Board to replace Mr. Chilcott for a period of 12 months.

For the period March 6, 2020 through April 4, 2020, the Compensation Committee agreed to pay Mr. Mooney his then current salary and benefits and $50,000 in cash, $25,000 of which was paid in a lump sum in April 2020, and the balance paid in equal installments over a six-month period beginning on May 5, 2020. In addition, Mr. Mooney will remain eligible for bonuses of up to $15,000 as approved by the Board based upon certain revenue and operational targets being achieved. Commencing May 5, 2020 in his role as Chairman, he will receive a quarterly grant of 16,500 stock options at the fair market value of the stock on the issuance date, vesting over two years and exercisable for a period of five years, and reimbursement for travel expenses. Mr. Mooney also agreed to provide consulting services to the Company, as needed, at a fixed fee of $4,500 per month on a month-to-month basis, plus reimbursement for travel expenses.

On July 20, 2020, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, increased Mr. Mooney’s monthly fee for consulting services to $10,000 from $4,500 per month, commencing on August 1, 2020 and ending on November 30, 2020.

Nicole Fernandez-McGovern

Based on her agreement commencing with the date of appointment as CFO in August 2016, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern earned a salary of $66,000 per year, payable in monthly installments of $5,500 for 2017. In 2018, her monthly installment payment increased to $8,000 and effective upon the closing of the Merger, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern’s salary increased to $150,000. As part of her compensation upon the closing of the Merger, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern also received 10-year stock options to purchase 265,033 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.06 per share, of which half of the options vested upon issuance and the remainder vested equally over two years. Additionally, on a quarterly basis, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern was awarded 12,500 shares of stock options to purchase Common Stock at an exercise price per share equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issuance during the term of her employment.

Effective January 1, 2019, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern signed a new employment agreement with the Company, whereby her annual base salary increased to $180,000; and a ten-year grant of 50,000 stock options to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.54 was awarded. In addition, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern continued to receive quarterly grants of 12,000 stock options to purchase Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issue during the term of her employment. All of the awards vested equally over two years.

On September 30, 2019, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee approved a new compensatory arrangement for Ms. Fernandez-McGovern. On September 30, 2019, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern was awarded a stock option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock under the Company’s current shareholder approved equity incentive plan. The option will vest in equal amounts over a two-year term from the date of grant and will be exercisable for a period of five years from date of grant. The exercise price of the stock option is $0.31 per share, which was the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the NYSE American on September 30, 2019. Ms. Fernandez-McGovern is also entitled to receive bonuses up to $39,000 in cash, 170,000 shares of restricted stock and 175,000 stock options upon the achievement of certain Company operational milestones. The foregoing compensation arrangements are in addition to the current compensation received by Ms. Fernandez-McGovern under her employment agreement.

On April 20, 2020, the Compensation Committee approved a 2020 Executive Compensation Plan for Ms. Fernandez-McGovern as CFO and EVP of Operations, providing for an annual salary of $200,000, cash bonus of $30,000, quarterly stock option grants of 15,000 and restricted stock units (RSUs) of 125,000, with the cash bonus, option and RSUs dependent upon her achieving certain financial and operational milestones.

On July 20, 2020, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved a change in the compensation of Ms. Fernandez-McGovern. The Compensation Committee engaged an independent third party to conduct a compensation study to assess if the Company’s compensation of its Board and its executive officers is in line with the industry average. As a result of the study, and upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved an increase in Ms. Fernandez-McGovern’s annual salary from $200,000 to $220,000 and an increase in quarterly stock options from 12,500 to 15,000. In addition to the previously approved 2020 bonus structure, Mr. Fernandez-McGovern was awarded an additional performance-based bonus of $40,000, equal to 20% of her then current salary. The approved compensation was retroactive to July 1, 2020.

J. Michael Drozd

Mr. Drozd receives a base salary of $235,000 per year, in his role as Chief Executive Officer which is subject to an annual performance review by the Compensation Committee of the Board and may be revised by the Committee, in its sole discretion. Mr. Drozd is entitled to receive an annual 20% bonus, which may be a mix of cash and stock options, based upon his performance as determined by certain metrics to be established by the Board and Mr. Drozd. He received an initial grant of 100,000 restricted stock units under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), which will fully vest after one year of continued employment. Mr. Drozd is eligible to receive a quarterly award of 15,000 non-qualified stock options under the Equity Plan. At the time of issuance, the stock option award agreements will set forth the vesting, exercisability, and exercise price of the stock options as of the date of the grants.

We have no other formal employment agreements with our executive officers, nor any compensatory plans or arrangements resulting from the resignation, retirement, or any other termination of our named executive officers, from a change-in-control, or from a change in any executive officer’s responsibilities following a change-in-control. However, it is possible we will enter into formal employment agreements with our executive officers in the future.

Bret Chilcott

Mr. Chilcott served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and as President since the inception of the Company in 2010 and had served as Chief Executive Officer from February 2016 to July 18, 2018. As of July 18, 2018, Mr. Chilcott stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and served as President, Secretary and Chairman of the Board of the Directors until his resignation as an officer and director on March 6, 2020. Up until May 2020, Mr. Chilcott had no formal agreement with the Company but did hold the position of Chief Executive of the Company for an annual salary of $175,000. Upon his resignation as Chief Executive Officer of the Company in 2018 his salary was reduced to $140,000, annually. Following his resignation in May 2020, Mr. Chilcott agreed to remain an employee of AgEagle and trust advisor to the Company’s leadership team for a period of twelve months to help ensure a seamless management transition.

Changes in Management

On March 6, 2020, Mr. Mooney resigned as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Board and Mr. Mooney reached a mutual agreement that he would continue in his role as Chief Executive Officer until May 5, 2020 (the “Transition Period”) during which time the Company had commenced its executive search for his replacement.

On March 6, 2020, Mr. Bret Chilcott resigned as President of the Company and as Chairman of the Board. The Board and Mr. Chilcott reached a mutual agreement that he would continue in his roles as President and Chairman during the Transition Period. Thereafter, Mr. Chilcott would no longer continue as an officer or director of the Company but remain an employee of the Company and advise the Company for a period of 12 months after the Transition Period to help ensure a seamless leadership transition. At the end of the 12-month period, it is Mr. Chilcott’s intention to retire.

It was also agreed that after the Transition Period, Mr. Mooney would continue with the Company in the role as Chairman of the Board to replace Mr. Chilcott.

In May 2020 following its formal executive search, the Company appointed J. Michael Drozd as AgEagle’s new Chief Executive Officer, replacing Mr. Mooney in the role.

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table lists the outstanding equity incentive awards held by Named Executive Officers (NEO) as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020:

    Option Awards Stock Awards
Name & Principal Position Year Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) Exercisable Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) Unexercisable Options Exercise price ($) Expiration Date Number of shares or units of stock that have not Vested (#) Market value of shares or units of stock that have not Vested ($)
Barrett Mooney  2020      25,000  $6.00  12/30/2025    $ 
Chairman of the Board & Former Chief Executive Officer  2020   3,125   21,875  $2.28  9/29/2025    $ 
   2020   3,750   11,250  $1.19  6/29/2025    $ 
   2020   5,625   9,375  $0.41  3/30/2025    $ 
   2019   7,500   7,500  $0.45  12/29/2024    $ 
   2019   9,375   5,625  $0.31  9/28/2024    $ 
   2019   62,500   37,500  $0.31  9/28/2024    $ 
   2019   145,833   104,167  $0.41  3/28/2029    $ 
Michael Drozd  2020      15,000  $6.00  12/30/2025  100,000  $600,000 
Chief Executive Officer  2020      125,000  $5.20  12/20/2025    $ 
   2020   1,875   13,125  $2.28  9/29/2025    $ 
   2020   1,791   5,376  $1.19  6/29/2025    $ 
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern  2020      15,000  $6.00  12/30/2025    $ 
Chief Financial Officer & EVP of Operations  2020      125,000  $5.20  12/20/2025    $ 
   2020   1,875   13,125  $2.28  9/29/2025    $ 
   2020   3,124   9,376  $1.19  6/29/2025    $ 
   2020   36,458   88,542  $1.27  5/13/2025    $ 
   2020   4,687   7,813  $0.41  3/30/2025    $ 
   2019   6,249   6,251  $0.45  12/29/2024    $ 
   2019   31,249   18,751  $0.31  9/28/2024    $ 
   2019   15,625   9,375  $0.31  9/28/2024    $ 
   2019   7,812   4,688  $0.31  9/28/2024    $ 
   2019   9,374   3,126  $0.29  6/28/2024    $ 
   2019   87,500   62,500  $0.41  3/28/2029    $ 
   2019   10,937   1,563  $0.41  3/29/2024    $ 
   2019   47,916   2,084  $0.54  12/31/2023    $ 
   2018   12,500     $0.56  12/30/2023    $ 
   2017   115,533     $0.06  10/2/2027    $ 

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

On March 6, 2020, Mr. Mooney resigned as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Board and Mr. Mooney reached a mutual agreement that he would continue in his role as Chief Executive Officer until May 5, 2020 during which time the Company has commenced an executive search for his replacement.

For the period March 6, 2020 through April 4, 2020, the Compensation Committee agreed to pay Mr. Mooney his then current salary and benefits and $50,000 in cash, $25,000 of which was paid in a lump sum in April 2020, and the balance paid in equal installments over a six-month period beginning on May 5, 2020. In addition, Mr. Mooney will remain eligible for bonuses of up to $15,000 as approved by the Board based upon certain revenue and operational targets being achieved. Commencing May 5, 2020 in his role as Chairman, he will receive a quarterly grant of 16,500 stock options at the fair market value of the stock on the issuance date, vesting over two years and exercisable for a period of five years; and reimbursement for travel expenses. Mr. Mooney also agreed to provide consulting services to the Company, as needed, at a fixed fee of $4,500 per month on a month-to-month basis, plus reimbursement for travel expenses. On July 20, 2020, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, increased Mr. Mooney’s monthly fee for consulting services to $10,000 from $4,500 per month, commencing on August 1, 2020 and ending on November 30, 2020.

On March 6, 2020, Mr. Bret Chilcott resigned as President of the Company and as Chairman of the Board. The Board and Mr. Chilcott reached a mutual agreement that he would continue in his roles as President and Chairman during the Transition Period. Thereafter, Mr. Chilcott will would no longer continue as an officer or director of the Company; but would be an employee of the Company and advise the Company for a period of 12 months after the Transition Period to help ensure a seamless leadership transition.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the members of our Board of Directors received the following cash compensation and stock awards:

 

PART III

Name Year Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(2) Stock Awards $ (1)(2)(3) Total $
         
Barrett Mooney  2020  $30,000  $163,338  $193,338 
Chairman of the Board and Former Chief Executive Officer  2019  $  $99,540  $99,540 
Tom Gardner  2020  $30,000  $129,784  $159,784 
Director  2019  $  $23,273  $23,273 
Grant Begley  2020  $30,000  $129,784  $159,784 
Director  2019  $  $23,273  $23,273 
Luis Ingargiola  2020  $30,000  $129,784  $159,784 
Director  2019  $  $32,343  $32,343 
Bret Chilcott  2020  $  $  $ 
Former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer  2019  $  $  $ 

(1)Pursuant to their respective offer letters in 2018, Messrs. Grant Begley and Thomas Gardner were entitled to receive for their service on the Board: (1) an initial grant of five-year options to purchase 77,356 shares of Common Stock as accrued for time served as a Board member at an exercise price of $0.06 per share that vested half upon issuance and the remainder is vesting equally over two years; and (2) additional five-year options to purchase 16,500 shares of Common Stock issuable per calendar quarter of service at an exercise price per share equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issuance that will vest equally over two years.
(2)On July 20, 2020, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved a change in the compensation of the directors. The Compensation Committee engaged an independent third party to perform a compensation study to assess if the Company’s compensation to its Board members is in line with the industry averages. As a result of the study, and upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved a cash component for director compensation in the amount of $60,000 per year, payable quarterly, and an increase in quarterly stock options from 16,500 shares to 25,000. The approved compensation was retroactive to July 1, 2020.
(3)Pursuant to Ms. Louisa Ingargiola’s offer letter dated November 27, 2018, she was entitled to receive for her service on the board: (1) an initial grant of five-year options to purchase 41,250 shares of Common Stock upon appointment, which was at an exercise price of $0.77 (equal to the market price of our Common Stock on the date of grant) that will vest in equal installments every calendar quarter over a one year period; and (2) five-year options to purchase 16,500 shares of Common Stock per calendar quarter of service at an exercise price per share equal to the market price of our Common Stock at the time of issuance that will vest in equal installments every calendar quarter for the two year period after date the grant. On September 30, 2019, the board granted Ms. Ingargiola an additional 100,000 options to purchased shares of Common Stock for her services as audit chair.

50

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of March 15, 2021 by:

each person, or group of affiliated persons, known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock;
each of our current directors;

each of our named executive officers; and
all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.

The information in the following table has been presented in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Under such rules, beneficial ownership of a class of capital stock includes any shares of such class as to which a person, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power or investment power and also any shares as to which a person has the right to acquire such voting or investment power within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. If two or more persons share voting power or investment power with respect to specific securities, each such person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of such securities. Except as we otherwise indicate below and under applicable community property laws, we believe that the beneficial owners of the Common Stock listed below, based on information they have furnished to us, have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. Except as otherwise indicated, each stockholder named in the table is assumed to have sole voting and investment power with respect to the number of shares listed opposite the stockholder’s name.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)Number of Shares (2)Percent of Class
Barrett Mooney
Chairman of the Board & Former Chief Executive Officer (3)280,484*%
Michael Drozd
Chief Executive Officer(3)30,694*%
Nicole Fernandez-McGovern
Chief Financial Officer & EVP of Operations (3)406,444*%
Grant Begley
Director(3)195,769*%
Thomas Gardner
Director(3)83,143*%
Louisa Ingargiola
Director(3)95,208*%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (6 persons)1,091,742*%

* Represents less than one percent

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

(1)Unless otherwise indicated, such individual’s address is c/o AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., 8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas 67226.
(2)The persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock reflected as beneficially owned by them. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within sixty (60) days from March 15, 2021 and the total outstanding shares used to calculate each beneficial owner’s percentage includes such shares, although such shares are not taken into account in the calculations of the total number of shares or percentage of outstanding shares. Beneficial ownership as reported does not include shares subject to option or conversion that are not exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2021.
(3)All shares reflected are those shares of Common Stock which underlie options issued and fully vested, as of March 15, 2021.

Equity Compensation Plans

 

InformationCompany 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

The Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Equity Plan is a comprehensive incentive compensation plan under which the Company can grant equity-based and other incentive awards to officers, employees and directors of, and consultants and advisers to, the Company The purpose of the Plan is to help the Company attract, motivate and retain such persons and thereby enhance shareholder value. The Plan provides for the grant of awards which are incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), unrestricted shares , restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, SARs, tandem stock appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, or any combination of the foregoing, to key management employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (each a “participant”) (however, solely Company employees or employees of the Company’s subsidiaries are eligible for incentive stock option awards). The Company has reserved a total of 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance as or under awards to be made under the Plan.

Types of Stock Awards

The Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. Stock options may be granted to employees, including officers, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company or its affiliates, except that incentive stock options may be granted only to employees.

Share Reserve

The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that have been reserved for issuance under the Plan is 4,000,000. As of December 31, 2020, there are 3,267,965 shares underlying options granted under the Plan and 732,035 shares of Common Stock available for future issuance under the Plan. If a stock option award expires, terminates, is canceled, or is forfeited for any reason, the number of shares subject to the stock option award will again be available for issuance. In addition, if stock awards are settled in responsecash, the share reserve will be reduced by the number of shares of Common Stock with a value equal to this itemthe amount of the cash distributions as of the time that such amount was determined and if stock options are exercised using net exercise, the share reserve will be reduced by the gross number of shares of Common Stock subject to the exercised portion of the option. We also had 207,055 shares underlying options that have been granted outside of the Plan which were exercised on July 20, 2020.

Administration

Our Board of Directors, or a duly authorized committee thereof, has the authority to administer the Plan. Subject to the terms of the Plan, our board of directors or the authorized committee, referred to herein as the committee, determines recipients, dates of grant, the numbers and types of stock awards to be granted and the terms and conditions of the stock option awards, including the period of exercisability and vesting schedule applicable to a stock option award. Subject to the limitations set forth below, the committee will also determine the exercise price and the types of consideration to be paid for the award. The committee has the authority to modify outstanding awards under the Plan. The committee has the authority to adopt, alter and repeal administrative rules, guidelines and practices governing the Plan and to perform all other acts, including delegating administrative responsibilities, as it deems advisable to construe and interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan and any stock option award granted under the Plan. Decisions and interpretations or other actions by the committee are in the discretion of the committee and are final binding and conclusive on the Company and all participants in the Plan.

Stock Options

Incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options are granted pursuant to stock option award agreements adopted by the committee. The committee determines the exercise price for a stock option, within the terms and conditions of the Plan, provided that the exercise price shall not be less than (i) in the case of a grant of any NQSO or an ISO to a key employee who at the time of the grant does not own stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock or of any subsidiary, one hundred percent (100%) of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as determined on the date the stock option award is incorporatedgranted; (ii) in the case of a grant of an ISO to a key employee who, at the time of grant, owns stock representing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock or of any subsidiary, one hundred ten percent (110%) of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock , as determined on the date the stock option award is granted. The fair market value of the Common Stock for purposes of determining the exercise price shall be determined by referencethe Committee in accordance with any reasonable method of valuation consistent with applicable requirements of Federal tax law, including, as applicable, the provisions of Code Section 422(c)(8) and 409A as applicable. Stock options granted under the Plan will become exercisable at the rate specified by the committee and may be exercisable for restricted stock, if determined by the committee.

The committee determines the term of stock options granted under the Plan, up to a maximum of ten years. The option holder’s stock option agreement shall provide the rights, if any, that such holder has to exercise the stock option at such time that such holder’s service relationship with us, or any of our affiliates, ceases for any reason, including disability, death, with or without cause, or voluntary resignation. All unvested stock option awards are forfeited if the participant’s employment or service is terminated for any reason, unless our compensation committee determines otherwise.

Acceptable consideration for the purchase of Common Stock issued upon the exercise of a stock option will be determined by the committee and may include (i) check, bank draft or money order or wire transfer, (ii) if the Company’s Common Stock is publicly traded, a broker-assisted cashless exercise, or (iii) such other methods as may be approved by the committee, including without limitation, the tender of shares of our Common Stock previously owned by the option holder or a net exercise of the option.

Unless the committee provides otherwise, options generally are not transferable except by will, the laws of descent and distribution. The committee may provide that a non-qualified stock option may be transferred to a family member, as such term is defined under the applicable securities laws.

Tax Limitations on Incentive Stock Options

The aggregate fair market value, determined at the time of grant, of our Common Stock with respect to incentive stock options that are exercisable for the first time by an option holder during any calendar year may not exceed $100,000. Options or portions thereof that exceed such limit will generally be treated as non-qualified stock options. No incentive stock option may be granted to any person who, at the time of the grant, owns or is deemed to own stock possessing more than 10% of our total combined voting power or that of any of our affiliates unless (i) the option exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of the stock subject to the option on the date of grant, and (ii) the term of the incentive stock option does not exceed five years from the registrant’s definitive proxy statementdate of grant.

Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure and other Special Transactions

In the event of a stock dividend, stock split, or recapitalization, or a corporate reorganization in which we are a surviving corporation (and our shareholders prior to such transaction continue to own at least 50% of our capital stock after such transaction), including without limitation a merger, consolidation, split-up or spin-off, or a liquidation, or distribution of securities or assets other than cash dividends, the number or kinds of shares subject to the Plan or to any stock option award previously granted, and the exercise price, shall be adjusted proportionately by the committee to reflect such event.

In the event of a merger, consolidation or other form of reorganization with or into another corporation (other than a merger, consolidation, or other form of reorganization in which we are the surviving corporation and our shareholders prior to such transaction continue to own at least 50% of the capital stock after such transaction), a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or a tender or exchange offer made by any corporation, person or entity (other than an offer made by us), all stock options held by any option holder shall be fully vested and exercisable by the option holder.

Furthermore, the committee, either before or after the merger, consolidation or other form of reorganization, may take such action as it determines in its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meetingsole discretion with respect to the number or kinds of Stockholders filed 120 days aftershares subject to the Plan or any option under the Plan.

Amendment, Suspension or Termination

The committee may at any time amend, suspend or terminate any and all parts of the Plan, any stock option award granted under the Plan, or both in such respects as the committee shall deem necessary or desirable, except that no such action may be taken which would impair the rights of any option holder with respect to any stock option award previously granted under the Plan without the option holder’s consent.

Description of Securities

Our authorized capital stock consists of 275,000,000 shares, of which 250,000,000 shares are designated as Common Stock par value $.001 per share, and 25,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock, par value $.001 per share of which (i) no shares have been designated as Series A Preferred Stock, (ii) 1,764 shares have been designated as Series B Preferred Stock, (ii) 10,000 shares have been designated as Series C Preferred Stock and (iii) 2,000 shares have been designated as Series D Preferred Stock and 1,050 shares have been designated as Series E. As of December 31, 2017.2020, we had 58,636,365 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. No shares of Preferred Stock are outstanding.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Director Independence

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.The Board of Directors has reviewed the independence of our directors based on the listing standards of the NYSE American. Based on this review, the Board of Directors determined that each of Messrs. Begley and Gardner and Ms. Ingargiola are independent within the meaning of the NYSE American. In making this determination, our Board of Directors considered the relationships that each of these non-employee directors has with us and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence. As required under applicable NYSE American rules, we anticipate that our independent directors will meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present.

 

Information in responseRelated Party Transactions

The Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Nicole Fernandez-McGovern, is one of the principals of Premier Financial Filings, a full-service financial printer. Premier Financial Filings provided contracted financial services to this item is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days afterCompany and their related expenses have been included within general and administrative expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2017.2020 and 2019, Premier Financial Filings provided services to the Company resulting in fees of $23,524 and $7,753, respectively.

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.One of our directors, Thomas Gardner, is one of the principals of NeuEon, Inc, which provide services to the company as CTO. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the company recognized $118,500 of expenses which is included in the general and administrative expense related to those services.

 

Information in responseFollowing Barrett Mooney’s resignation as Chief Executive Officer effective May 2020 he agreed to this item is incorporated by referenceprovide consulting services to the Company, as needed, at a fixed fee of $4,500 per month on a month-to-month basis, plus reimbursement for travel expenses. On July 20, 2020, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, increased Mr. Mooney’s monthly fee for consulting services to $10,000 from $4,500 per month, which commenced on August 1, 2020 and ending on November 30, 2020. For the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days afteryear ended December 31, 2017.2020, the company recognized $66,500 of expenses which is included in the general and administrative expense related to those services.

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days after December 31, 2017.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.Audit and Tax Fees

 

Information in responseOur current independent registered public accounting firm WithumSmith+Brown, PC, billed an aggregate of $5,150 related to this item is incorporated by reference fromaudit services for the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Stockholder Meeting of Stockholders filed 120 days afteryear ended December 31, 2017.2020. Our former independent auditor, D. Brooks and Associates CPAs, billed an aggregate of $47,161 related to audit and the quarterly reviews for the year ended December 31, 2020. In addition, D. Brooks and Associates CPAs, billed an aggregate of $45,000 related to audit and the quarterly reviews for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company was also billed by an outside firm to perform an independent inventory observation $1,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In addition, $8,540 and $10,550 was billed for tax services in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Audit Fees and Audit Related Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for auditing our Financial Statements, reviews of interim Financial Statements included in quarterly reports, services performed in connection with other filings with the Securities & Exchange Commission and related comfort letters and other services that are normally provided by our independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Tax Fees consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and local tax compliance and consultation in connection with various transactions and acquisitions.

  2020 2019
Audit Fees $52,311  $45,000 
Audit-Related Fees  1,000   1,000 
Tax Fees  8,540   10,550 
Total $61,851  $56,550 

 

 4355

 

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

The following information required under this item is filed as part of this report:

99.ITEM 15.Financial StatementsEXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES

 

Page
Management Responsibility for Financial Information44
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting45
Index to Financial StatementsF-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsF-2
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-4
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders EquityF-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-7

2. Financial Statement Schedules

None.

3. Exhibit Index

Exhibit
No.
 Description
   
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger between Millennium Plastics Corporation and Midwest Energy, Inc. filed on August 16, 2006. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2006)
2.2Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Registrant, BRE Merger Sub, Inc., Black Raven Energy, Inc. and West Coast Opportunity Fund, LLC dated July 23, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 on Form 8-K filed July 29, 2013)
2.3Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of October 19, 2017, by and among EnerJex Resources, Inc., AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 20, 2017).
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2008)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Appendix C to Schedule 14A filed on June 6, 2013)
3.3Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on May 29, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2014)
3.43.3 Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2014)
3.53.4 Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Form S-1/A filed on June 3, 2014)
3.6Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
3.73.5 Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 27, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2018)2017)
4.13.6 Specimen common stock certificateAmendment to Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.33.3 to the Form S-1/A filed on May 27, 2008)
4.2Specimen Series A Preferred Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Form S-1/A filed on June 3, 2014)
4.3Specimen Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.2 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)29, 2018)
4.43.7 Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2011).
4.53.8 FormAmended and Restated Certificate of Warrant to Purchase CommonDesignation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the 10% Series A Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference asto Exhibit 4.3 on Current Report3.1 to the Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)29, 2018)

 44

4.63.9 FormCertificate of Placement Agent WarrantAmendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the 10% Series A Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference asto Exhibit 4.4 on Current Report3.2 to the Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)29, 2018)
3.10Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of EnerJex Resources, Inc. to change the company’s name (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.11Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of EnerJex Resources, Inc. to effect a 1-for-25 reverse stock split (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.12Articles of Merger, dated March 26, 2018, by and between AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc.(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.6 on Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)
3.13Amended and Restated Bylaws, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Appendix C to Schedule 14A filed on May 22, 2013)
3.14Certificate of Designation of Series D 8% Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on December 26, 2018 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2018)

3.15Certificate of Designation for the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 2, 2020 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 8, 2020)
4.1*

Description of Registrant’s Securities

4.2Pre-Funded Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2021)
4.3Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 on Form 8-K filed on June August 6, 2020)
10.1 Form2017 Equity Incentive Plan of Officer and Director Indemnification Agreement (incorporatedthe Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-KS-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on October 16, 2008)July 24, 2018)
10.2 Amendment 4 to Joint Exploration Agreement effectiveASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT, dated as of November 6, 2008 between MorMeg,July 25, 2018, into by and among the (i) Registrant, (ii) EAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant, (iii) AGRIBOTIX, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, (iv) the individuals listed on the signature page thereof, and EnerJex Resources, Inc.  (incorporated(v) Paul Hoff, in his capacity as the representative of the Seller Investor. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the10.1 on Form 10-K8-K filed on July 14, 2009)31, 2018).

10.3 Amendment 5 to Joint ExplorationEmployment Agreement effective as of December 31, 2009 between MorMeg LLC and EnerJex Resources, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Form 10-Q filed on February 16, 2010)for Nicole Fernandez-McGovern dated January 1, 2019
10.4 Amendment 6 to Joint ExplorationAgEagle Employee Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement effective as of March 31, 2010 between MorMeg LLCAgEagle Aerial Systems Inc and EnerJex Resources, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Form 10-K filed on July 15, 2010)Nicole Fernandez-McGovern dated January 1, 2019
10.5 Amended and Restated EnerJex Resources, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (incorporatedEmployment Agreement for Michael Drozd, dated April 28, 2020 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on October 16, 2008)May 1, 2020)

10.6 Joint Development
10.6*AgEagle Employee Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights Agreement between EnerJex Resources,AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and Haas Petroleum, LLCJ. Michael Drozd dated December 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2011).as of May 18, 2020
10.7 Joint OperatingSecurities Purchase Agreement by and between EnerJex Resources,AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and Haas Petroleum, LLC and MorMeg, LLCAlpha Anstalt Capital, dated December 31, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2011).
10.8Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 3, 20112020 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2011).
10.9Option and Joint Development Agreement by and among Registrant and MorMeg, LLC dated August 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2011).
10.10First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 14, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2011).
10.11Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated August 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2012).
10.12Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 2, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2012).
10.13Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and among Registrant and Robert G. Watson, Jr. dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2013).
10.14Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2013).
10.15First Amendment to Amended & Restated Mortgage Security Agreement, Financing Statement and Assignment of Production by and among Working Interest, LLC and Texas Capital Bank dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2013).
10.16Mortgage, Security Agreement, Financing Statement and Assignment of Production and Revenues by and among Working Interest, LLC and Texas Capital Bank dated December 31, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2013).
10.172013 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 12, 2013)
10.18Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated September 30, 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed October 1, 2013).
10.19Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated November 19, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 on Form 10-Q filed May 13, 2014).
10.20Exchange Agreement between EnerJex Resources, Inc. and holders of Series A preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 on Form S-1/A Amendment No. 2 filed June 3, 2014).
10.21Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated May 22, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed May 27, 2014).
10.22Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 11, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.1 on Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2015)
10.23Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated August 13, 2014 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.23 on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2015).
10.24Ninth Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated April 29, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed May 5, 2015).
10.25Purchase Agreement by and among Registrant and Northland Securities, Inc. dated May 8, 2015 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 1.1 of Form 8-K filed May 8, 2015.)
10.26Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated September 8, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of Form 10-Q filed November 16, 2015).
10.27Eleventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Registrant and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. dated November 16, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed November 16, 2015).
10.28Forbearance Agreement dated April 4, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed June 3, 2016).

 45

10.29Third Amendment to Forbearance Agreement dated July 29, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2016.
10.30Letter Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and among Texas Capital Bank, N.A., Iberia Bank, PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, EnerJex Resources, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Black Raven Energy, Inc. and Adena, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.31Loan Sale Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and among Texas Capital Bank, N.A., Iberia Bank, PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, EnerJex Resources, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Black Raven Energy, Inc., and Adena, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.32Consulting Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and between Registrant and Douglas Wright (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.33Employment Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and between Registrant and Louis G. Schott (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017).
10.34Separation and General Release Agreement dated February 10, 2017, by and between Registrant and Robert G. Watson, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2017).
10.35Form of Additional Issuance Agreement among Enerjex Resources, Inc. and Alpha Capital Anstalt effective as of April 27, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2017).January 5, 2020)
10.3610.8 Form of ServicesLease Agreement, dated August 3, 2020, by and among EnerJex Resources,AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., and Camber Energy, Inc. dated April 27, 2017 (incorporatedU.S. Business Centers, L.L.C. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2017).August 7, 2020)
10.3710.9 Second Amended and Restated Credit AgreementConvertible Promissory Note, dated May 10, 2017, by and among the Registrant, EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Raven Energy, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Adena, LLC, Working Interest, LLC, Kansas Holdings, LLC and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC (incorporatedOctober 14, 2020 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 toof the Current Report on Formform 8-K filed on May 12, 2017).October 16, 2020)
10.3814.1 Amended and Restated Note dated May 10, 2017, by and amongCode of Ethics of the Registrant EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Raven Energy, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, Adena, LLC, Working Interest, LLC, Kansas Holdings, LLC and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC (incorporated hereinApplicable To Directors, Officers And Employees (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current ReportRegistration Statement on Form 8-KS-1 (Reg. No. 333-226324) originally filed on May 12, 2017).July 24, 2018)
21.1*

List of Subsidiaries

23.1*Consent of WithumSmith+Brown, PC., an independent registered public accounting firm
23.2*

Consent of D. Brooks and Associates CPAs, P.A., an independent registered public accounting firm

10.3931.1* GuarantyRule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Recourse Carveouts dated May 10, 2017, by and between the Registrant and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2017).principal executive officer
10.4031.2* Secured Promissory Note dated July 14, 2017, by Registrant and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2017).Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of principal financial officer
10.4132.1* Voting Agreement, dated asSection 1350 Certification of October 19, 2017, by and among EnerJex Resources, Inc. and a principal stockholder of AgEagle (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 20, 2017).executive officer
10.4232.2* Private Placement Commitment Letter Agreement dated November 21, 2017 bySection 1350 Certification of principal financial officer and among the Company and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Form S-4 Registration Statement filed with the SEC on November 22, 2017).principal accounting officer
10.43 Private Placement Agreement dated as of November 21, 2017, by and among EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Alpha Capital Anstalt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 27, 2017).
10.44Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 20, 2017, by and between EnerJex Resources, Inc. and the Purchaser thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 22, 2017).
10.45First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated December 22, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2017).
10.46Second Amended and Restated Note December 22, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 29, 2017).
10.47Letter Agreement dated January 31, 2018 from EnerJex Resources, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 6, 2018).
21.1Subsidiaries*
23.1Consent of Cobb & Associates, Inc.*
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
32.2Certificate of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
99.1Cobb & Associates Letter Report dated*
101.INS XBRL Instance Document*INSTANCE DOCUMENT
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*
TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

 46

SIGNATURESherewith

 

Pursuant to the requirements ofItem 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amended report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

ENERJEX RESOURCES,AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.
   
Dated: March 31, 2021By:/s/ Louis G. SchottJ. Michael Drozd
 

Louis G. Schott 

Interim

J. Michael Drozd
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) 

   
Date:Dated: March 23, 201831, 2021By:/s/ Nicole Fernandez-McGovern
 Nicole Fernandez-McGovern
Chief Financial Officer, EVP of Operations and Secretary

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrantregistrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

NameSignatures Title Date
     
/s/ Louis G. SchottJ. Michael Drozd Interim Chief Executive Officer March 23, 201831, 2021
Louis G. SchottJ. Michael Drozd (Principal Executive Officer), Secretary  
     
/s/ Robert SchleizerNicole Fernandez-McGovern Interim Chief Financial Officer, EVP of Operations and Secretary March 23, 201831, 2021
Robert SchleizerNicole Fernandez-McGovern  (Principal Financial/(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ Ryan A. LoweBarrett Mooney DirectorChairman of the Board March 23, 201831, 2021
Ryan A. LoweBarrett Mooney    
     
/s/ Lance W. HelfertGrant Begley Director March 23, 201831, 2021
Lance HelfertGrant Begley    
     
/s/ James G. MillerLuisa Ingargiola Director March 23, 201831, 2021
James G. MillerLuisa Ingargiola    
     
/s/ Richard E. MenchacaThomas Gardner Director March 23, 201831, 2021
Richard E. MenchacaThomas Gardner    

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 47

 

Index to Financial Statements

ContentsPage No.
  
Index to Financial StatementsF-1
ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirmsF-2
  
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019F-3F-5
  
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019F-4F-6
 
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019F-7
  
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016F-5
Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019F-6F-8
  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7F-9

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To Thethe Board of Directors and Stockholders of 

EnerJex ResourcesAgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of EnerJex Resources,AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries, (the “Company”), as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficitequity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear then ended, December 31, 2017 and the related notes to consolidated financial statements (collectively referred to as the “consolidated“ consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the periodyear then ended, December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

The Company's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, generated negative cash flows from operating activities, has an accumulated deficit and has stated that substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's evaluation of the events and conditions and management’s plans in regarding these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Equity Transactions

Description of the Matter:

As described in note 8 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company raised capital using convertible instruments which are inherently complex in nature. During the year ended December 31, 2020, these convertible instruments were converted into shares of common stock. These transactions converted into common shares in addition to triggering downround provisions and deemed dividends. The transactions required complex auditor judgment due to the number and the variety of the types of instruments and the subjectivity of assumptions used to value the transactions.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

Addressing the matter involved obtaining an understanding of the controls over the Company’s process for issuing and recording equity. We assessed the appropriateness of judgments made by management in determining key assumptions used in the valuation of each equity transaction. We obtained and reviewed all material equity agreements and considered whether the recording was appropriate given the nature of the transaction. We recalculated the value of the amounts recorded based on management’s key assumptions and on the related stock value at the time of the transaction. We agreed all material cash consideration received in equity raises to the Company’s bank statements. We also tested the accuracy and the completeness of the disclosure of the transactions.

/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.

Orlando, Florida

March 31, 2021


 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Company’sits internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits,audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our auditsaudit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our auditsaudit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

D. Brooks and Associates CPAs, P.A.

 

//s// RBSM, LLP 

New York, New York

March 23, 2018 

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 20142015.

 

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida

April 10, 2020

New York | Washington, DC | California | Nevada  

China | India | Greece 

Member ANTEA INTERNATIONAL with offices worldwide


EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance SheetsCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Assets        
Current Assets:        
Cash unrestricted $677,936  $128,035 
Restricted cash     50,000 
Accounts receivable  143,799   600,255 
Derivative receivable     10,570 
Inventory     185,733 
Marketable securities     210,990 
Deposits and prepaid expenses  223,648   493,384 
Total current assets  1,045,383   1,678,967 
         
Non-current assets:        
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $618,661 and $1,817,711  178,115   2,077,055 
Oil & gas properties using full cost accounting, net of accumulated DD&A of $8,597,539 and $15,189,716  1,411,225   3,437,030 
Other non-current assets     798,809 
Total non-current assets  1,589,340   6,312,894 
Total assets $2,634,723  $7,991,861 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ (Deficit)        
         
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $217,941  $294,241 
Accrued liabilities  1,034,827   1,535,165 
Current portion of long term debt  4,876,903   17,925,000 
Total current liabilities  6,129,671   19,754,406 
         
Non-Current Liabilities:        
Asset retirement obligation  1,611,845   3,314,191 
Other long-term liabilities  6,919,579   3,401,149 
Total non-current liabilities  8,531,424   6,715,340 
Total liabilities  14,661,095   26,469,746 
         
Commitments and Contingencies        
         
Stockholders’ (Deficit):        
10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 1,999,998 and 938,248 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  2,000   938 
Series B Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 1,764 shares authorized, 352 and 1,764 issued and outstanding, respectively  1   2 
Series C Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 500 shares authorized, 300 and 0 issued and outstanding, respectively  1    
Series C Convertible Preferred stock issuable  200,000    
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 16,294,891 and 8,423,936 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  16,295   8,424 
Paid in capital  74,185,091   69,090,613 
Accumulated deficit  (86,429,760)  (87,577,862)
Total stockholders’ (deficit)  (12,026,372)  (18,477,885)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ (deficit) $2,634,723  $7,991,861 
  As of
  December 31, December 31,
ASSETS 2020 2019
CURRENT ASSETS:        
Cash $23,940,333  $717,997 
Accounts receivable     65,833 
Inventories, net  135,647   221,167 
Prepaid and other current assets  122,011   124,163 
Notes receivable  600,000    
Total current assets  24,797,991   1,129,160 
         
Property and equipment, net  122,589   37,776 
Right of use asset  257,363    
Intangible assets, net  440,527   520,573 
Goodwill  3,108,000   3,108,000 
Total assets $28,726,470  $4,795,509 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Accounts payable $159,812  $57,432 
Accrued expenses  1,844,825   36,416 
Accrued dividends     163,555 
Contract liabilities  2,302   264,472 
Current portion of lease liability  85,895    
Current portion of promissory note  89,533    
Total current liabilities  2,182,367   521,875 
         
Long term portion of lease liability  171,468    
Long term portion of promissory note  17,906    
Total liabilities  2,371,741   521,875 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (SEE NOTE 10)        
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:        
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized:        
Preferred Stock, Series C Convertible, $0.001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, 0 and 3,501 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively     4 
Preferred Stock, Series D, $0.001 par value, 2,000 shares authorized, 0 and 2,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively     2 
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 58,636,365 and 15,424,394 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively  58,636   15,424 
Additional paid-in capital  47,241,757   12,456,989 
Accumulated deficit  (20,945,664)  (8,198,785)
Total stockholders’ equity 26,354,729  4,273,634 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $28,726,470  $4,795,509 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 F-3CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

  For the Years Ended December 31,
  2020 2019
Revenues $1,285,383  $296,677 
Cost of sales  711,650   202,049 
Gross Profit  573,733   94,628 
         
Operating Expenses:        
Selling expenses  40,003   65,015 
General and administrative  2,732,274   1,850,225 
Professional fees  2,703,371   662,633 
Research and development  29,392   38,948 
Total Operating Expenses  5,505,040   2,616,821 
Loss from Operations  (4,931,307)  (2,522,193)
         
Other Expenses:        
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  (594)   
Interest expense  (549)  (501)
Total Other Expenses  (1,143)  (501)
Loss Before Income Taxes  (4,932,450)  (2,522,694)
Provision for income taxes      
Net Loss $(4,932,450) $(2,522,694)
Deemed dividends on redemption of Series D Preferred Stock  (3,763,591)   
Deemed dividends on Series C Preferred Stock and Series D warrants  (4,050,838)   
Deemed dividends on issuance and repurchase of Series E Preferred Stock  (1,227,120)   
Series D Preferred stock dividends  (69,778)  (162,222)
         
Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders  (14,043,777)  (2,684,916)
         
Net Loss Per Common Share - Basic and Diluted $(0.35) $(0.18)
         
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding During the Period -- Basic and Diluted  40,688,019   14,714,533 

 

EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Crude oil revenues $1,309,496  $2,390,024 
Natural gas revenues  19,509   71,703 
Total revenues  1,329,005   2,461,727 
         
Expenses:        
Direct operating costs  1,363,946   2,661,258 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  346,197   413,967 
Impairment of oil and gas assets     8,032,670 
Professional fees  1,390,512   310,471 
Salaries  350,863   1,723,789 
Administrative expense  545,267   458,375 
Total expenses  3,996,785   13,600,530 
Loss from operations  (2,667,780)  (11,138,803)
         
Other income (expense):        
Interest expense  (1,250,191)  (1,911,906)
Gain on loan sale agreement  11,500,124    
(Loss) on mark to market of derivative contracts     (2,531,401)
Other income  692,879   2,406,340 
Total other income (expense)  10,942,812   (2,036,967)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  8,275,032   (13,175,770)
Provision for income taxes      
         
Net income (loss) $8,275,032  $(13,175,770)
         
Net income (loss) $8,275,032  $(13,175,770)
Beneficial Conversion on Series C Preferred Stock  (208,500)   
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution provision  (3,400,000)   
Preferred dividends  (3,518,430)  (3,010,211)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $1,148,102  $(16,185,981)
Net income (loss) per common share basic $0.11  $(1.92)
Weighted average shares basic  10,503,070   8,423,936 
Net income (loss) per common share diluted $0.11  $(1.92)
Weighted average shares diluted  10,503,070   8,423,936 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ (Deficit)CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Years Ended DecemberYEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 and 2016

                                             
   10% Series A   Series B Series C     Series C        Total 
   Preferred Stock  Preferred Stock Preferred
Stock
  Common Stock  Preferred
Stock
  Paid In  Retained  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount Shares Amount  Shares  Amount  Issuable  Capital  Deficit  (Deficit) 
Balance, January 1, 2016  938,248  938   1,764  2  —   —    8,423,936   $8,424   $—    $68,848,944  (71,391,881)  $(2,533,573)
Stock based compensation  —    —    —    —    —   —    —    —    —    241,669   —    241,669 
Preferred stock dividends  —    —    —    —   —    —    —    —    —    —    (3,010,211)  (3,010,211)
Net loss for the year  —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    (13,175,770)  (13,175,770)
Balance, December 31, 2016  938,248   938   1,764   2  —   —    8,423,936   8,424   —    69,090,613   (87,577,862)  (18,477,885)
Stock based compensation                                    13,690       13,690 
Preferred stock dividends                                        (3,518,430)  (3,518,430)
Common stock issued for anti-dilution provision                        597,461   597       299,403  (300,000   
Warrants exercised                        1,771,428   1,772       529,658       531,430 
Sale of series A preferred stock  1,061,750   1,062                             648,729       649,791 
Sale of series C preferred stock                 300   1               299,999       300,000 
Series C preferred stock issuable                                200,000           200,000 
Conversion of series B preferred stock          (1,412)  (1)        5,502,066   5,502       (5,501)       
Beneficial conversion feature                                    208,500   (208,500)   
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution provision                                    3,100,000   (3,100,000)   
Net income for the year                                        8,275,032   8,275,032 
Balance, December 31, 2017  1,999,998  $2,000   352  $1  300  $1   16,294,891  $16,295  $200,000  $74,185,091  $(86,429,760) $(12,026,372)

2020 AND 2019

 

  Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series C Shares Preferred Stock Series C Amount Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series D Shares Preferred Stock Series D Amount Par $ .0001 Preferred Stock Series E Shares Preferred Stock Series E Amount Par $ .0001 Common Shares Common Stock Amount Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit Total
Stockholders’ Equity
Balance as of December 31, 2018  4,662  $5   2,000  $2     $   12,549,394  $12,549  $12,171,274  $(5,676,091) $6,507,739 
Conversion of Series C Preferred Stock  (1,161)  (1)              2,150,000   2,150   (2,149)      
Additional shares issued for Agribotix acquisition                    175,000   175   (175)      
Issuance of Common Stock for consulting services                    550,000   550   189,950      190,500 
Dividend on Series D Preferred Stock                          (162,222)     (162,222)
Stock-based compensation expense                          260,311      260,311 
Net Loss                             (2,522,694)  (2,522,694)
Balance as of December 31, 2019  3,501  $4   2,000  $2     $   15,424,394  $15,424  $12,456,989  $(8,198,785) $4,273,634 
Reversal of escrow shares related to Agribotix acquisition                    (164,375)  (164)  164       
Issuance of Common Stock for consulting services                    250,000   250   297,250      297,500 
Conversion of Series C Preferred Stock  (3,501)  (4)              13,597,984   13,598   (13,594)      
Conversion of Series D Preferred stock and accrued dividends        (2,000)  (2)        4,135,815   4,136   159,421      163,555 
Issuance of Series E Preferred Stock, net of issuance costs              1,050   1         1,009,999      1,010,000 
Repurchase of Series E Preferred Stock              (262)           (1,110,880)     (1,110,880)
Conversion of Series E Preferred Stock              (788)  (1)  3,152,000   3,152   (3,151)      
Sale of Common Stock, net of issuance costs                    10,163,105   10,163   22,786,579      22,796,742 
Sale of Common Stock from exercise of warrants                    11,025,544   11,025   3,309,091      3,320,116 
Exercise of options                    881,898   882   133,631      134,513 
Deemed dividend on Series C Preferred Stock and Series D warrants                          4,050,838   (4,050,838)   
Deemed dividend on redemption of Series D Preferred Stock                          3,763,591   (3,763,591)   
Stock-based compensation expense                    170,000   170   401,829      401,999 
Net Loss                             (4,932,450)  (4,932,450)
Balance at December 31, 2020    $     $     $   58,636,365  $58,636  $47,241,757  $(20,945,664) $26,354,729 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 F-5


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC.AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

  For the Years Ended December 31,
  2020 2019
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(4,932,450) $(2,522,694)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  594    
Depreciation and amortization  173,661   171,588 
Stock-based compensation  401,999   260,311 
Shares issued for professional services  297,500   190,500 
Loss on impairment     162,984 
         
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  65,833   (65,740)
Inventories  85,520   (71,685)
Prepaid expenses and other assets  2,152   (43,793)
Accounts payable  102,380   (140,395)
Accrued expenses  1,808,411   (18,946)
Contract liabilities  (262,171)  259,580
Net cash used in operating activities  (2,256,571)  (1,818,290)
         
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Issuance of notes receivable  (600,000)   
Purchases of fixed assets  (106,124)  (24,445)
Platform development costs  (72,899)   
Net cash used in investing activities  (779,023)  (24,445)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from (payments on) promissory note  107,439   (40,998)
Issuance of Series E Preferred stock  1,010,000    
Repurchase of Series E Preferred stock  (1,110,880)   
Sales of Common Stock, net of issuance cost  22,796,742    
Sale of Common Stock from exercise of warrants  3,320,116    
Exercise of stock options  134,513    
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  26,257,930   (40,998)
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash  23,222,336   (1,883,733)
Cash at beginning of year  717,997   2,601,730 
Cash at end of year $23,940,333  $717,997 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Interest cash paid $  $501 
Income taxes paid $  $ 
Accrued dividends $  $163,555 
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Conversion of Series C, D and E Preferred Stock into Common Stock $6,551  $2,150 
Issuance of Series E Preferred Stock $1,050  $ 
Deemed dividends $9,111,327  $162,222 

 

EnerJex Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Cash flows from operating activities        
Net income (loss) $8,275,032  $(13,175,770)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  234,135   413,967 
Write-off of inventory  71,982    
Amortization of deferred financing costs  223,790     
Impairment of oil and gas assets     8,032,670 
Stock, options and warrants issued for services  13,690   241,669 
Accretion of asset retirement obligation  112,062   225,480 
Settlement of asset retirement obligations     (2,767)
(Gain) loss on derivatives     2,520,831 
Gain on loan sale agreement, net of cash  (11,500,124)   
Changes in current assets and liabilities        
Accounts receivable  105,772   377,233 
Inventory  (15,943)  (41,406)
Deposits and prepaid expenses  252,478   (246,059)
Accounts payable  (94,783)  (848,601)
Accrued liabilities  1,080,420   404,108 
Cash flows used in operating activities  (1,241,489)  (2,098,645)
         
Cash flows from investing activities        
Purchase of fixed assets     (241,683)
Oil and gas properties additions  (4,632)  (17,089)
Increase in restricted cash     (50,000)
Cash flows (used in) investing activities  (4,632)  (308,772)
         
Cash flows from financing activities        
Proceeds from sale of stock and warrant exercise  1,681,221    
Proceeds from borrowings  225,000    
Repayments of long-term debt  (67,653)  (686,660)
Bank account transfer on loan sale agreement  (92,546)   
Cash released from restricted cash  50,000    
Deferred financing costs     120,430 
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities  1,796,022  (566,230)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  549,901  (2,973,647)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning  128,035   3,101,682 
Cash and cash equivalents, end $677,936  $128,035 
         
Supplemental disclosures:        
Interest paid $  $922,072 
Income taxes paid $  $ 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Beneficial conversion feature on Series C preferred stock accounted as preferred dividend $208,500    
Common stock issued for anti-dilution provision $597    
Conversion of Series B preferred stock into common stock $5,502    
Share-based payments issued for services $13,690  $241,669 
Payroll liability converted to note payable $113,750    
Non-cash note payable issued in conjunction with the LSA $105,806    
Deemed dividend for anti-dilution provision $3,400,000    
Preferred dividends payable $3,518,430  $3,010,211 
Loan settled and exchanged with assets including oil and gas properties and liabilities  $13,425,000    

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


EnerJex Resources, Inc.

For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 


Note 1 - Summary of Accounting PoliciesAGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

 

Note 1 – Description of Business

AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (“AgEagle,” “the Company,” “us,” “we,” “our”) produces, supports and operates technologically advanced drone systems and solutions for the fast-emerging unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) industry. We are engaged in delivering the metrics, tools and strategies necessary to invent and implement drone-enabled solutions that solve important problems for our valued customers. With our founding premise rooted in high performance, next-level thinking, and technological innovation, AgEagle is intent on ensuring that new standards for quality U.S. manufacturing and the provision of precision-crafted, purpose-built drone systems and solutions are delivered to empower our customers to thrive and prosper in The Drone Age. ™

Founded in 2010, AgEagle was originally formed to pioneer proprietary, professional-grade, fixed-wing drones and aerial imagery-based data collection and analytics solutions for the agriculture industry. In addition to selling our innovative drones to the precision and sustainable farming markets, AgEagle’s innovative data collection and analytics solutions have processed more than two million acres of crops, analyzing data that seeks to adopt and support productive agricultural approaches to improve farming practices which currently limit the impact on our natural resources, reduce reliance on inputs and materially increase crop yields and profits.

In the first half of 2019, the Company introduced HempOverview, a scalable, responsive and cost-effective Software-as-a-Solution (“SaaS”) web- and map-based technology platform to support the operations of domestic industrial hemp programs for state and tribal nation departments of agriculture – a solution that provides users with what the Company believes is the gold standard for regulatory oversight, operational assistance and reporting capabilities for the fast emerging industrial hemp industry.

Over the past decade, the broader drone market has continued to evolve and expand. As a result, economic and productivity benefits made possible by drones is fueling global demand for high quality, safe and reliable drone systems and solutions for commercial applications well beyond agriculture. In response, AgEagle is now leveraging our technological expertise and drone engineering and manufacturing experience to penetrate new, high growth market sectors; namely, drone package delivery, public safety/security, large venue decontamination and infrastructure/inspection, among other high growth market opportunities.

AgEagle’s key growth objectives are centered on three primary areas of focus:

1)Ag Solutions: Leveraging our reputation as one of the leading technology solutions providers to the agriculture industry to increase market share through delivery of best-in-class drones, sensors and data analytics for hemp and other commercial crops;
2)Drone Manufacturing: Establishing AgEagle as the dominant commercial drone design, engineering, manufacturing, assembly and testing company in the United States; and
3)Drone Solutions: Establishing the Company as one of the industry’s leading American-made trusted source for turnkey, end-to-end, tailored drone solutions to the world.

We intend to grow our business by preserving a leadership position in our core Ag Solutions business; providing quality contract manufacturing, assembly, and testing services; and innovating new customer-focused drone systems and solutions to capture significant share of the broader commercial drone market. In addition, we expect to accelerate our growth and expansion through strategic acquisitions of drone-related companies offering distinct technological and competitive advantages and have defensible IP protection in place, if applicable.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 1 – Description of Business – Continued

 The Company is headquartered in Wichita, Kansas.

Corporate History; Recent Business Combinations

On March 26, 2018, our predecessor company, EnerJex Resources, Inc. (“EnerJex”), a Nevada company, consummated the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated October 19, 2017, pursuant to which AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex, merged with and into AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc., a privately held company organized under the laws of the state of Nevada (“AgEagle Sub”), with AgEagle Sub surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of EnerJex (the “Merger”). In connection with the Merger, EnerJex changed its name to AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. (the “Company, “we,” “our,” or “us”) and AgEagle Sub changed its name initially to “Eagle Aerial, Inc. and then to” AgEagle Aerial, Inc. Prior to this merger all of the EnerJex operations were conducted through EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Black Sable”) and Black Raven Energy, Inc. a Nevada corporation (“Black Raven”). Its leasehold interests were held in its wholly-owned subsidiaries Black Sable, Working Interest, LLC, EnerJex Kansas and Black Raven. Black Sable, Black Raven and Working Interest, LLC were all dissolved as of the end of 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the Company continues with the wholly-owned subsidiaries AgEagle Aerial, Inc. and Enerjex Kansas, Inc.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Our and Consolidation - These financial consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our operationsThe Company’s consolidated financial statements are considered to fall withinprepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a single industry segment, which are the acquisition, development, exploitation and production of crude oil and natural gas properties in the United States.  OurDecember 31 fiscal year end.

The consolidated financial statements include ourthe accounts of AgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

subsidiaries AgEagle Aerial, Inc. and EnerJex Kansas, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated uponin consolidation.  Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. 

Nature of Business

We are an independent energy company engaged in the business of producing and selling crude oil and natural gas. The crude oil and natural gas is obtained primarily by the acquisition and subsequent exploration and development of mineral leases.  Development and exploration may include drilling new exploratory or development wells on these leases. These operations are conducted primarily in Kansas.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

 

The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Such consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company’s management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) in all material respects and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

During the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company discovered errors in the income tax provision as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.  These errors relate to computing the deferred tax assets using a blended state and federal tax rate and also computing a deferred tax asset using the incorrect amount of net operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2019.  The total of these errors were offset by incorrectly increasing the valuation allowance by the same amount.  The adjustment was to decrease the deferred tax asset by $1,130,297 and to decrease the valuation allowance by the same amount.  Since there was no impact to the Company’s net loss or the Company’s equity for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 the Company has determined that these errors were not material to the consolidated financial statements.  The deferred tax asset and valuation allowance has been cumulatively adjusted as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 to correct these errors and the impact of these changes are included in the reconciliation of income tax disclosure for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuesrevenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates included in the consolidated financial statements are: (1) oil and gas revenues and reserves; (2) depreciation, depletion and amortization; (3) valuation allowances associated with income taxes (4) accrued assets and liabilities; (5) stock-based compensation; (6) asset retirement obligations, (7) valuation of derivative instruments and (8) impairment of oil and gas assets.  Although management believes these estimates are reasonable, changes in facts and circumstances or discovery of new information may result in revised estimates.  Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the reserve for obsolete inventory, valuation of stock issued for services and stock options, valuation of intangible assets and the valuation of deferred tax assets.

 

Trade Accounts ReceivableFair Value Measurements and Disclosures–The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) requires companies to determine fair value based on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability to a market participant. The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement.

 

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear any interest.  We regularly review receivables to insure that the amounts will be collected and establish or adjust an allowance for uncollectible amounts as necessary using the specific identification method.  Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

 

Inventory

Inventories are comprisedNote 2 – Summary of crude oil held in storage and materials and supplies used in field operations. Crude oil inventories are valued at lower of cost or market, on a first-in, first out basis. Material and supplies are valued at lower of cost or market, based upon specific cost or by using a weighted average cost.

Share-Based PaymentsSignificant Accounting Policies -- Continued

 

The value we assign to the options and warrantsguidance requires that we issue is based on the fair market value as calculated by the Black-Scholes pricing model. To perform a calculation of the value of our options and warrants, we determine an estimate of the volatility of our stock.  We need to estimate volatility because there has not been enough trading of our stock to determine an appropriate measure of volatility. We believe our estimate of volatility is reasonable, and we review the assumptions used to determine this whenever we issue new equity instruments.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized when itemscarried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of income and expense are recognized in the financial statements in different periods than when recognized in the applicable tax return. Deferred tax assets arise when expenses are recognized in the financial statements before the tax returns or when income items are recognized in the tax return prior to the financial statements. Deferred tax assets also arise when operating losses or tax credits are available to offset tax payments due in future years. Deferred tax liabilities arise when income items are recognized in the financial statements before the tax returns or when expenses are recognized in the tax return prior to the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the date when the change in the tax rate was enacted.following categories:

 


We routinely assess the reliability of our deferred tax assets.  If we conclude that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized under accounting standards, the tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance.  In addition we routinely assess uncertain tax positions, and accrue for tax positions that are not more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.

Uncertain Tax Positions

We follow guidance in Topic 740 of the Codification for its accounting for uncertain tax positions. Topic 740 prescribes guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. To recognize a tax position, we determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation, based solely on the technical merits of the position. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of tax benefit recognized with respect to any tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement.

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

 

We have no liabilityassets or liabilities that are required to have their fair value measured on a recurring basis at December 31, 2020 or 2019. Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are subject to fair value adjustments when there is evidence of impairment.

For short-term classes of our financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes receivable and accounts payable, and which are not reported at fair value, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. Additionally, the Note payable is carried at face value, which approximates fair value, due to the government backed security which requires payments however management is expecting to apply for unrecognized tax benefits recorded asand receive full forgiveness during 2021 (See Note 7).

Concentrations -The Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000. The Company’s bank balances at times may exceed the FDIC limit. To date, the Company has not experienced any losses on its invested cash.

As of December 31, 20172020, there was one significant vendor that the Company relies upon to perform stitching its FarmLens platform. This vendor provides services to the Company which can be replaced by alternative vendors should the need arise.

Receivables and 2016. Accordingly, there is noCredit PolicyTrade receivables due from customers are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. Terms with our distributor allow for payment terms of 45 days from the invoice date. Trade receivables are stated at the amount billed to the customer. The Company generally does not charge interest on overdue customer account balances. Payments of unrecognized tax benefits that,trade receivables are allocated to the specific invoices identified on the customer’s remittance advice or, if recognized, would affectunspecified, are applied to the effective tax rateearliest unpaid invoices. Accounts receivable at January 1, 2019 was $93.

The Company estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon an evaluation of the current status of receivables, historical experience, and there is no amount of interest or penalties currently recognized in the consolidated statement of operations or consolidated balance sheetother factors as of December 31, 2017. In addition, we do not believe that there are any positions for which itnecessary. It is reasonably possible that the total amountsCompany’s estimate of unrecognized tax benefitsthe allowance for doubtful accounts will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. We recognize related interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.

Tax years open for audit by federal tax authoritieschange. The Company determined that no allowance was necessary as of December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2019.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Continued

Inventories  Inventories, which consist of raw materials, finished goods and work-in-process, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost being determined by the average-cost method, which approximates the first-in, first-out method. Cost components include direct materials and direct labor, as well as in-bound freight. At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates its ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. This evaluation primarily includes an analysis of forecasted demand in relation to the inventory on hand, among consideration of other factors. The physical condition (e.g., age and quality) of the inventories is also considered in establishing its valuation. Based upon the evaluation, provisions are made to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable values. Once established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the respective inventories. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the amounts that the Company may ultimately realize upon the disposition of inventories if future economic conditions, customer inventory levels, product discontinuances, sales return levels or competitive conditions differ from the Company’s estimates and expectations. As of December 31, 2020, and 2019, the Company had recorded a provision for obsolescence of $10,000.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets – The assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are recorded under the acquisition method of accounting at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying identifiable net assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is not subject to amortization and is tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill may not be recoverable.

Intangible assets from acquired businesses are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date and consist of customer programs, trademarks, customer relationships, technology and other intangible assets. Customer programs include values assigned to major programs of acquired businesses and represent the aggregate value associated with the customer relationships, contracts, technology and trademarks underlying the associated program and are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of expected cash flows used to measure fair value, which ranges from four to five years.

Business Combinations - The Company recognizes, with certain exceptions, 100% of the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests when the acquisition constitutes a change in control of the acquired entity. Shares issued in consideration for a business combination, contingent consideration arrangements and pre-acquisition loss and gain contingencies are all measured and recorded at their acquisition-date fair value. Subsequent changes to fair value of contingent consideration arrangements are generally reflected in earnings. Any in-process research and development assets acquired are capitalized as of the acquisition date. Acquisition-related transaction costs are expensed as incurred. The operating results of entities acquired are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition.

Revenue Recognition and Concentration – The majority of the Company’s revenue is generated pursuant to written contractual arrangements to develop, manufacture and/or modify complex drone related products, and to provide associated engineering, technical and other services according to customer specifications. These contracts are a fixed price and are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under fixed-price contracts, the Company agrees to perform the specified work for a pre-determined price. To the extent the Company’s actual costs vary from the estimates upon which the price was negotiated, it will generate more or less profit or could incur a loss. The Company accounts for a contract after it has been approved by all parties to the arrangement, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Continued

The Company generally recognizes revenue on sales to customers, dealers and distributors upon satisfaction of performance obligations which generally occurs once controls transfer to customers, which is when product is shipped or delivered depending on specific shipping terms. Additionally, customers are required to place a deposit or pay upon shipping for each UAV or drone delivery assembly part ordered. Customer payments received in advance of the Company completing performance obligations are recorded as contract liabilities.

The Company’s FarmLens platform is offered on subscription basis for processing aerial imaging. These subscription fees are recognized ratably over each monthly membership period as the services are provided.

Sales concentration information for customers comprising more than 10% of the Company’s total net sales such customers is summarized below:

  Percent of total revenues for year ended December 31,
Customers 2020 2019
Customer A  93.7%  90.8%

There were no accounts receivable from Customer A due as of December 31, 2020. Accounts receivable due from Customer A comprised all of the accounts receivable as of December 31, 2019.

The table below reflects our revenue for the years indicated by product mix.

  For the Year Ended December 31,
Type 2020 2019
Drone and Custom Manufacturing Sales $1,218,735  $267,622 
Software Subscription Sales  66,648   29,055 
Total $1,285,383  $296,677 

Shipping Costs Shipping costs for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20152020 and 2016. Tax years ending prior to 2014 are open for audit2019 totaled $6,122, and $5,493, respectively. All shipping costs billed directly to the extent thatcustomer are directly offset to shipping costs resulting in a net operating losses generatedexpense to the Company which is included in those years are being carried forward or utilized in an open year.cost of goods sold on the accompanying statements of operations.

 

Fair Value Measurements

Accounting guidance establishes a single authoritative definitionResearch and Development Expenses – Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and are included as part of fair value based upon the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and creates a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.  Additional disclosures are required, including disclosures of fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy.  We incorporate a credit risk assumption into the measurement of certain assets and liabilities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investment instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents for purposes of theaccompanying consolidated statements of cash flows and other statements. We maintain cash on deposit, which, can exceeds federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses on such accounts and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and equivalents.

Revenue Recognition

Oil and gas revenues are recognized net of royalties when production is sold to a purchaser at a fixed or determinable price, when delivery has occurred and title has transferred, and if collection of the revenue is probable. Cash received relating to future revenues is deferred and recognized when all revenue recognition criteria are met.

Fixed Assets

Property and equipment are recorded at cost.

At December 31, 2017, Fixed Assets consisted of furniture and equipment of $773,707 and building and leasehold improvements of $23,069, as well as accumulated depreciation of furniture and fixtures of $597,692 and accumulated depreciation of building and leasehold improvements of $20,969.

At December 31, 2016, Fixed Assets consisted of vehicles $355,886, furniture and equipment of $795,563, building and leasehold improvements of $23,069 and gathering and compression systems of $2,720,247, as well as accumulated depreciation of vehicles of $336,083, accumulated depreciation of furniture and fixtures of $532,190, accumulated depreciation of building and leasehold improvements of $17,515 and accumulated depreciation of gathering and compression systems of $931,923. 


Depreciation is determined by the use of the straight-line method of accounting using the estimated lives of the assets (3-15 years).  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense.

Debt issue costs

Debt issuance costs incurred are capitalized and subsequently amortized over the term of the related debt utilizing the straight-line method of amortization over the estimated life of the debt.

Oil & Gas Properties and Long-Lived Assets

We follow the full cost method of accounting under which all costs associated with property acquisition, explorationoperations. Research and development activities are capitalized. We also capitalize internal costs that can be directly identified with our acquisition, explorationtotaled $29,392 and development activities and do not include costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities.

Proved properties are amortized using the units of production method (UOP). Currently we only have operations in the United States of America. The UOP calculation multiplies the percentage of estimated proved reserves produced each quarter by the cost of these reserves. The amortization base in the UOP calculation includes the sum of proved property, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A), estimated future development costs (future costs to access and develop proved reserves) and asset retirement costs, less related salvage value. 

The cost of unproved properties are excluded from the amortization calculation until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to such properties or until development projects are placed into service. Geological and geophysical costs not associated with specific properties are recorded as proved property immediately. Unproved properties are reviewed$38,948 for impairment quarterly.

Impairment of long-lived assets is recorded when indications of impairment are present. Impairment is indicated when the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying value.  The carrying value of the assets is then reduced to their estimated fair value that is measured based on an estimate of future discounted cash flows.

Under the full-cost-method of accounting, the net book value of oil and gas properties, less deferred income taxes, may not exceed a calculated “ceiling.” The ceiling limitation is (a) the present value of future net revenues computed by applying current prices of oil & gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil & gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of 10 percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditionsplus (b) the cost of properties not being amortizedplus (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortizedless (d) income tax effects related to differences between book and tax basis of properties. Future cash outflows associated with settling accrued retirement obligations are excluded from the calculation. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using end-of-period costs and an un-weighted arithmetic average of commodity prices in effect on the first day of each of the previous 12 months held flat for the life of the production, except where prices are defined by contractual arrangements.

Any excess of the net book value of proved oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes, over the ceiling is charged to expense and reflected as additional DD&A in the statement of operations. The ceiling calculation is performed quarterly. For the year ended December 31, 2016 impairment charges of $8,032,670 were recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2017, no impairment charges were recorded.

Proceeds from the sale or disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction to capitalized costs unless a significant portion (greater than 25%) of our reserve quantities are sold, in which case a gain or loss is recognized in income. In 2015, the Company sold its Cherokee project assets located in Eastern Kansas for net proceeds of $2,867,305. At the time of the sale the reserve quantities made up approximately 6.7% of total reserve quantities. Accordingly, the net proceeds reduced the carrying value of our oil and gas properties.

On February 10, 2017, the Company and the other Sellers entered into and completed the transactions contemplated by the LSA, described in greater detail in “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The asset retirement obligation relates to the plug and abandonment costs when our wells are no longer useful. We determine the value of the liability by obtaining quotes for this service and estimate the increase we will face in the future. We then discount the future value based on an intrinsic interest rate that is appropriate for us. If costs rise more than what we have expected there could be additional charges in the future, however, we monitor the costs of the abandoned wells and we will adjust this liability if necessary.


Major Purchasers

For the years ended December 31, 2017,2020 and 2016 we sold our produced crude oil to ARM Energy Management, LLC, Coffeyville Resources Inc., and Sunoco Logistics Inc. on a month-to-month basis and we sold our produced natural gas to United Energy Trading and Western Operating Company.2019, respectively.

 

Marketable Securities Available for Sale

The Company classifies its marketable equity securities as available-for-sale and they are carried at fair market value at December 31, 2016, the carrying value of this security was $210,990. During 2017 the security was transferred as part of the LSA transaction (described below).

Net IncomeLoss Per Common Share

Basic net incomeloss per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholdersloss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding duringfor the period.year. Diluted earningsloss per share reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect,is computed by dividing net loss by the impactweighted average number of common shares issuable upon exercise of stockoutstanding plus Common Stock equivalents (if dilutive) related to warrants, options and warrants and conversion of convertible debt and preferred stock that are not deemed to be anti-dilutive.instruments.

 Potentially Dilutive Securities The dilutive effect of theCompany has excluded all common equivalent shares outstanding stockfor warrants, options and warrants is computed usingconvertible instruments to purchase Common Stock from the treasury stock method.

calculation of diluted net loss per share, because all such securities are anti-dilutive for the periods presented. For the year ended December 31, 2016, diluted net loss per share did not include2020, the effect of 298,664 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stockCompany had 2,516,778 warrants and 2,255,267 options as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods to conform to current presentations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted by the Company

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part 1) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Non-public Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU 2017-11”). Part I relates to the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features in Subtopic 815-40, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced based on the pricing of future equity offerings. An entity still is required to determine whether instruments would be classified as equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities. ASU 2017-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-11 duringpurchase Common Stock. For the year ended December 31, 2017. The2019, the Company had nocumulative effect4,531,924 warrants, 2,480,470 options to purchase Common Stock, and 3,501 shares of the change in accounting principle on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets asSeries C Preferred Stock which may be converted into 6,483,333 shares of the beginning of 2017.Common Stock.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

 

RecentNote 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Pronouncements ApplicablePolicies – Continued

LeasesThe Company accounts for its operating leases in accordance with FASB Account Standards Update 2016-02 – Leases (Topic 842) Lessees recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all their leases. to the Company recognizes assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease.

Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. This topic requires an asset and liability approach for accounting for income taxes. The Company evaluates its tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken on income tax returns to determine if an accrual is necessary for uncertain tax positions. The Company will recognize future accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense if incurred. All income tax returns not filed more than three years ago are subject to federal and state tax examinations by tax authorities.

Stock-Based Compensation Awards The Company accounts for its stock-based awards in accordance with ASC Subtopic 718-10, “Compensation – Stock Compensation”, which requires fair value measurement on the grant date and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors. For stock options, the Company estimates the fair value using a closed option valuation (Black-Scholes) model. The estimated fair value is then expensed over the requisite service period of the award which is generally the vesting period and the related amount is recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations within general and administrative expenses. The Company recognizes forfeitures at the time they occur.

The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of certain assumptions that require the Company’s judgment, including the expected term and the expected stock price volatility of the underlying stock. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based compensation represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of judgment. As a result, if factors change resulting in the use of different assumptions, stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

Uncertainty––The recent outbreak of the COVID-19 coronavirus is impacting worldwide economic activity. COVID-19 poses the risk that we or our employees, CROs, suppliers, manufacturers and other partners may be prevented from conducting business activities for an indefinite period of time, including due to the spread of the disease or shutdowns that may be requested or mandated by governmental authorities. While it is not possible at this time to estimate the full impact that COVID-19 could have on our business, the continued spread of COVID-19 could disrupt our clinical trials, supply chain and the manufacture or shipment of our cyclodextrin products, and other related activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we have not yet experienced any material disruptions in our business or other negative consequences relating to COVID-19, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. See Note 7.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted

 

In May 2014,January 2017, the FASB issued (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). The updated simplifies the process for assessing goodwill impairment. The amended guidance under GAAP. The core principleremoves the second step that was previously required. Under this ASU, impairment charges to goodwill are based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying value to its fair value. ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five- step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. The guidance2017-04 is effective for annual and interim periodsthe Company in its fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2017. The standard is required to be2019 with early adoption permitted. In 2019, the Company adopted using eitherASU 2017-04 and applied the full retrospective approach, with all prior periods presented adjusted, or the modified retrospective approach, with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings on the opening balance sheet. The Company plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method applied to contracts that are not completed as of that date. The Company has not identified changes to its revenue recognition policies that would result in a material adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on January 1, 2018. Adopting this guidance will result in increased disclosures related to revenue recognition policies and disaggregation of revenue in future disclosures in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. As allowed by the practical expedients under Topic 606, the Company does not plan to provide expanded disclosures with respect to the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with variable consideration or with an original term of one year or less.annual impairment test (see Note 6).

 

In February 2016,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, a2018-13, Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820). This ASU removes or modifies current disclosures while adding certain new lease standard requiring lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for most leases classified as operating leases under previous U.S. GAAP.disclosure requirements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2019 and interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted.permitted for the removed or modified disclosures. The Company willremoved and modified disclosures can be required to useadopted retrospectively, and the added disclosures should be adopted prospectively. The Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2018-13 effective December 15, 2019 did not have a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into aftermaterial impact on the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

 


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Continued

In August 2016,2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (Topic 350-40). This ASU allows for capitalization of Cash Flows (Topic 230). ASU 2016-15 seeks to reduce the existing diversity in practice in howimplementation costs associated with certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This updatecloud computing arrangements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,2019 and interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2018-15 effective December 15, 2019 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Pending Adoption

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), which provides guidance on how an entity should measure credit losses on financial instruments. The ASU is effective for smaller reporting company’s for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted.years. The Company plansdoes not expect this ASU to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company has not identified any changes that upon adoption will have a material effect on its cash flows.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”, which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2018. The Company has not identified any changes that upon adoption will have a material effectimpact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

The FASB issued ASU 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic: 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and the Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets,” which helps filers determine the guidance applicable for gain/loss recognition subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments also clarify that the derecognition of all businesses except those related to conveyances of oil and gas rights or contracts with customers should be accounted for in accordance with the derecognition and deconsolidation guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation. The Company adopted the ASU on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method. Under this transition method the Company may elect to apply this guidance retrospectively either to all contracts at the date of initial application or only to contracts that are not completed contracts at the date of initial application. The Company elected to evaluate only contracts that are not completed contracts. As there were no not completed contracts at January 1, 2018, there was no impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures upon adoption.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. The FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires companies to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations of all leases with a term greater than 12 months (long-term) on the balance sheet. Leases to explore for or use minerals, oil and natural gas are not impacted by this guidance. In January 2018,December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, “Leases (Topic 842), Land Easement Practical Expedient2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for TransitionIncome Taxes. The amendments in ASU 2019-12 simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to Topic 842.” Thisthe general principles and clarifying a handful of narrow issues within the broad topic of income tax accounting. The amendments in ASU permits an entity to continue to apply its current accounting policy for land easements that existed before the effective date of Topic 842. Once an entity adopts Topic 842, it would apply that Topic prospectively to all new (or modified) land easements to determine whether the arrangement contains a lease. Topic 842 requires adoption by application of a modified retrospective transition approach and is2019-12 are effective for years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by FASB did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.

 Note 3 — Inventories

Inventories consist of the following at:

  December 31,
  2020 2019
Raw materials $88,091  $193,022 
Work-in process  50,447   26,456 
Finished goods  7,109   11,689 
Gross inventory  145,647   231,167 
Less obsolescence reserve  (10,000)  (10,000)
Total $135,647  $221,167 

Note 4 – Notes Receivable

On October 14, 2020, in connection with, and as an incentive to the entry into a two-year exclusive manufacturing agreement to produce a patented Drone Delivery Station for Valqari LLC (“Valqari”), AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Convertible Promissory Note pursuant to which the Company on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.has made a loan to Valqari, in the principal aggregate amount of $500,000 (the “Note”), which amount accrues interest at a rate of three percent per annum.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 4 – Notes Receivable -- Continued

The Companyloan matures on April 15, 2021 (the “Maturity Date”), at which time all outstanding principal and interest that has accrued, but remains, unpaid shall be due. The Note provides for an automatic six month extension of the Maturity Date under the following circumstances (i) Valqari has received in writing, (x) a good faith acquisition offer at a consideration value greater than $15,000,000, (y) such offer, upon consummation, would result in a change in control (as defined in the note) of Valqari, and (z) at such time Valqari, is actively engaged in the negotiation or finalization of such acquisition transaction; or (ii) Valqari has initiated, or is in the process of reviewing its portfolioinitiating, a conversion to a “C-Corporation” under the Internal Revenue Code, whereas such conversion will be completed no later than one day prior to the extended Maturity Date. Valqari may not prepay the Note prior to the Maturity Date.

In the event of leased assets and related contractsa change in control or conversion of Valqari to determinea “C-Corporation” under the impact that adoption will haveInternal Revenue Code on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company is also assessingor before the impact of Topic 842 on its systems, processes and internal controls. The Company plans to elect certain practical expedients when implementing the new lease standard, which meansMaturity Date, the Company will not have to reassessmay convert the existence or classificationoutstanding principal amount of leases for contracts, including land easements that commencedthe Note and any unpaid accrued interest into (i) Class B Common Units of Valqari: immediately prior to adoption. the closing of a Change in Control or (ii) upon Valqari’s conversion to a C-corporation, shares of Valqari Common Stock, in both cases at a conversion price no higher than a pre-money valuation of $15,000,000.

The Company anticipates upon adoptionNote is subject to recognize assetscustomary representations and liabilities forwarranties by Valqari, as well as events of default, which may lead to acceleration of the rights and obligationspayment of its existing long-term operating leasesthe Note such as (i) failure to pay all of the outstanding principal, plus accrued interest on its consolidated balance sheets andthe Maturity Date, (ii) Valqari filing a petition or action under any bankruptcy, or other law, or (iii) an involuntary petition is filed again Valqari under any bankruptcy statute (that is not dismissed or discharged within 60 days). The indebtedness evidenced by the Note is subordinated in right of payment to utilize new systems, processes and internal controls to properly identify, classify, measure and recognize new (or modified) leases afterthe prior payment in full of any senior indebtedness (as defined in the Note) in existence on the date of adoption.the Note or incurred thereafter.

On November 16, 2020, the Company (Payee) executed a promissory note in connection with a proposed acquisition (the “Proposed Acquisition”) by the Payee or its affiliate, for 100% of the capital stock of MicaSense Inc., (“MicaSense”). Parrot Drones S.A.S. promises to pay to the Company the principal amount of $100,000 provided such principal amount shall be off-set and reduced by all amounts paid or due in connection with the audit of the financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019 of MicaSense evidenced by invoices from MicaSense’s auditors, copies of which shall be provided to Payee (the “Audit Costs”), together with any accrued and unpaid interest on the maturity date of March 15, 2021 unless the note is credited towards the purchase price upon closing of the proposed acquisition or otherwise accelerated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the remedies section within the noted.

Note 5 — Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the following at:

    December 31,
Type Estimated Life 2020 2019
Leasehold improvements 3 Years $22,265  $12,170 
Equipment and vehicles 5 Years  100,532   101,652 
Computer and office equipment 5 Years  23,369   7,262 
Furniture 5 Years  54,798    
Drone equipment 3 Years  32,138   19,674 
Total    233,102   140,758 
Less accumulated depreciation    (110,513)  (102,982)
Total Property and equipment, net   $122,589  $37,776 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $20,716 and $15,043, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2020 the company recorded $13,185 on disposal, resulting on a loss of $594 which is included in other expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 6 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are recorded at cost and consist of the assets acquired for the acquisition of SaaS completed in 2018 (see Note 3) and our HempOverview platform development costs. Goodwill and intangible assets were comprised of the following as of December 31, 2020:

Name Estimated Life Balance at January 1, 2020 Additions Amortization Impairment Balance at December 31, 2020
Intellectual property/technology  5 Years $317,826  $  $(86,680) $  $231,146 
Customer base  5 Years  52,800      (14,400)     38,400 
Tradenames and trademarks  5 Years  42,680      (11,640)     31,040 
Non-compete agreement  4 Years  107,267      (40,225)     67,042 
 Platform development costs       72,899         72,899 
Total Intangible Assets   $520,573   72,899   (152,945)    $440,527 
Goodwill    3,108,000            3,108,000 
Total   $3,628,573  $72,899  $(152,945) $  $3,548,527 

Goodwill and intangible assets were comprised of the following as of December 31, 2019:

Name Estimated Life Balance at January 1, 2019 Additions Amortization Impairment Balance at December 31, 2019
Intellectual property/technology  5 Years $404,506  $  $(86,680) $  $317,826 
Customer base  5 Years  70,800      (18,800)     52,800 
Tradenames and trademarks  5 Years  54,320      (11,640)     42,680 
Non-compete agreement  4 Years  147,492      (40,225)     107,267 
Total Intangible Assets   $677,118      (156,545)    $520,573 
Goodwill    3,270,984         (162,984)  3,108,000 
Total   $3,948,102  $  $(156,545) $(162,984) $3,628,573 

The weighted average remaining amortization period in years is 2.46 years. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $152,945 and $156,545, respectively.

Future amortization is as follows for fiscal years ending:

  2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Intellectual property/technology $86,680  $86,680  $57,786  $  $ 
Customer base  14,400   14,400   9,600       
Tradenames and trademarks  11,640   11,640   7,760       
Non-compete agreement  40,225   26,817          
Platform development costs  14,580   14,580   14,580   14,580   14,579 
Total $167,525  $154,117  $89,726  $14,580  $14,579 


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 6 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets -- Continued

In the fourth quarter of 2020 and 2019, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test using a quantitative approach by comparing the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, to its fair value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds its fair value, a goodwill impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company will complete its evaluation during 2018 and will adopt Topic 842 on January 1, 2019,estimates the fair value of each reporting unit using a modified retrospective approach for all comparative periods presented.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definitioncombination of a Business. This new standard clarifiesdiscounted cash flow (DCF) (Level 3 input) analysis and market-based valuation methodology such as comparable public company trading values. Determining fair value requires the definitionexercise of significant judgments, including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, long-term growth rates, discount rates and relevant comparable public company earnings multiples and relevant trading multiples. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis are based on estimates of future sales, earnings and cash flows after considering factors such as general market conditions, existing firm orders, expected future orders, changes in working capital, long term business plans and recent operating performance. The DCF analysis used a business and provides a screen to determine when an integrated setdiscount rate of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of13%.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of)reporting unit was found to be less than its carrying value and the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $162,984 which is concentratedincluded in a single identifiable asset or a groupgeneral and administrative expense on the statements of similar identifiableoperations.

For purposes of testing the finite-lived intangible assets the set is not a business. This new standard will be effectivesum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset group was compared to the asset group’s carrying value. Based on the impairment test for the goodwill and finite-lived intangibles assets related to the SaaS reporting unit no impairment exists for those assets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company on January 1, 2018; however, early adoption is permitted with prospective applicationwill continue to any business development transaction.


Note 2 - Going Concernamortize the related finite-intangible asset over their estimated useful lives.

 

Note 7 – Promissory Note

On May 6, 2020, the Company received a loan in the amount of $107,439 from the Small Business Administration (SBA) as part of Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act’s Paycheck Protection Plan (PPP). The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assumingloan is unsecured, nonrecourse, accrues interest at one percent per annum, with a due date of May 6, 2022. Under the terms of the loan, a portion or all of the loan is forgivable to the extent that the loan proceeds are used to fund qualifying payroll, rent and utilities during a designated twenty-four-week period through October 21, 2020.

The unforgiven portion of the PPP loan is payable over two years and can be extended to five years if agreed upon by both parties and bears interest at a rate of 1%, with a deferral of payments for the first six months. The Company intends to use the proceeds for purposes consistent with the PPP. While the Company currently believes that its use of the loan proceeds will meet the conditions for forgiveness of the loan, there can be no assurance that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2017 of $86,429,760. Also, cash used in operations was $1,241,489 for the year ended December 31, 2017.  The ability ofnot take actions that could cause the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplishbe ineligible for forgiveness of the plans described below.loan, in whole or in part. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary ifmaturities of the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.loan for the:

Year Ending December 31, Amount
2021  $89,533 
2022   17,906 
   $107,439 


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

 

Merger AgreementNote 8 – Equity

 

On October 19, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”), which designs, develops, produces, and distributes technologically advanced small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV or drones) that are supplied to the agriculture industry, and AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into AgEagle, Merger Sub will cease to exist and AgEagle will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). The respective boards of directors of the Company and AgEagle have approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.Series C Preferred Stock

 

At the effective timeEach share of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), the shares of AgEagle capital stock will be automatically converted into the right to receive equal to 85% of the then issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis. In addition, at the Effective Time all outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of AgEagle common stock will be assumed by the Company and converted into options and warrants to purchase shares of Company common stock. No fractional shares of Company common stock will be issued in the Merger but will be rounded to the nearest whole share. Following the consummation of the Merger, former stockholders of AgEagle with respect to the Merger are expected to own 85% of the Company’s outstanding common stock (inclusive of the AgEagle assumed stock options and warrants), and current common and Series A Preferred stockholders of the Company are expected to own 15% of the Company, excluding shares of common stock that may be issued in connection with the conversion of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock and not including any additionalis convertible into a number of shares which may be issuedof our Common Stock equal to the quotient determined by dividing (x) the stated value of $1,000 per share, by (y) a conversion price of $0.54. Until the volume weighted average price of our Common Stock on NYSE exceeds $107.50 with average trading volume of 200,000 shares per day for ten consecutive trading days, the conversion price of our Series C Preferred Stock is subject to full-ratchet, anti-dilution price protection. Under that provision, if, while that full-ratchet, anti-dilution price protection is in connection with the Company’s closing obligation to provide up to $4 million in new working capital and the elimination of all liabilities currently on the Company’s balance sheet.

In connection with the Merger,effect, the Company will also fileissues shares of our Common Stock at a proxy statement seeking stockholder approval to: (a) amendprice per share (the “Dilutive Price”) that is less than the termsconversion price, then the conversion price of itsour Series AC Preferred Stock (as discussed below); (b) approve the issuance of the Company’s shares in connection with the Mergeris automatically reduced to be equal to the AgEagle shareholders and new investors, in excessDilutive Price. The effect of 19.9% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock; (c) approvethat reduction is that, upon the issuance of shares to current Company management and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees,Common Stock at a majority of which willDilutive Price, the Series C Preferred Stock would be held in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnity obligations under the Merger Agreement; and (d) change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Resources, Inc.” 

The Merger Agreement provides that, immediately following the Effective Time, the existing board of directors and officers of the Company will resign and new directors and officers will be appointed by AgEagle.

The Company intends to dispose of its principal assets, consisting primarily of its Kansas oil and gas properties, concurrently with the closing of the Merger. In the event the Merger is not consummated, the Company does not haveconvertible into a present intention to dispose of the above described assets.

The completion of the Merger is subject to various customary conditions, including, among other things: (a) the approval of the stockholders of the Company and AgEagle (which Company shareholder approval has been received to date); (b) the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by each of the Company and AgEagle and the compliance by each of the Company and AgEagle with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement; (c) approval of the stockholders of the Company for the issuance of its common stock and any other securities (x) to the AgEagle stockholders in connection with the Merger and (y) in connection with the financing transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (d) approval for the listinggreater number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued in the Merger and other related transactions on the NYSE American; and (e) that all of the Company’s assets as disclosed shall have been sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and the corresponding debt and liabilities shall have been extinguished. The Company’s existing cash resources are insufficient to satisfy all of its outstanding liabilities. Accordingly, in order to satisfy the condition and consummate the Merger, the Company will be required to raise additional funding prior to the closing of the Merger, the failure of which could result in the Company’s failure to consummate the Merger Agreement.

F-12

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants obligating each of the Company and AgEagle to continue to conduct its respective business in the ordinary course, to provide reasonable access to each other’s information and to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate and coordinate to make any filings or submissions that are required to be made under any applicable laws or requested to be made by any government authority in connection with the Merger. The Merger Agreement also contains a customary “no solicitation” provision pursuant to which, prior to the earlier of January 31, 2018, or the completion or termination of the Merger, neither the Company nor AgEagle may solicit or engage in discussions with any third party regarding another acquisition proposal unless, in the Company’s case, it has received an unsolicited, bona fide written proposal that the recipient’s board of directors determines is or would reasonably be expected to result in a superior proposal. The Company has paid AgEagle a $50,000 non-refundable fee at the signing of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights in favor of each of the Company and AgEagle.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains provisions for indemnification in the event of any damages suffered by either party as a result of breaches of representations and warranties contained therein. The aggregate maximum indemnification obligation of any indemnifying party for damages with respect to breaches of representations and warranties set forth in the Merger Agreement shall not exceed, in the aggregate, $350,000, other than for fraud, intentional misrepresentation or willful breach. An indemnifying party shall satisfy its indemnification obligations with shares of Company common stock equal to the aggregate amount of losses of the indemnified party, calculated based upon the greater of (i) the value of the Company common stock as of the closing of the Merger; and (ii) the average closing price of the Company common stock on the NYSE American for the five trading days immediately prior to the date such a claim is made. The Company has agreed to deposit an aggregate of 1,215,278 shares of common stock to be issued to current officers and directors of the Company in lieu of deferred salary and fees into escrow to secure its indemnification obligations, the issuance of such shares requiring the approval of the Company’s common stockholders.

In connection with, and as a condition to the closing of the Merger, the Company is seeking the consent of the holder of its Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) to amend the terms thereof to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the value of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the right of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, and (iii) convert each share of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of Company common stock. An affirmative vote of 66.7% of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock voting as a class as of the record date of the proxy statement is required to amend the terms of the Certificate of Designation to provide for these changes, as required under the Merger Agreement. As of September 30, 2017, the Series A Preferred Stock had accrued a total of $6,039,972 in accrued but unpaid dividends, which would result in an additional 241,599 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued by the Company to satisfy these accrued dividends.

The Merger Agreement provides either party the right to terminate the Merger if it has not been consummated by January 31, 2018, provided that if all of the conditions to closing shall have been satisfied or shall be capable of being satisfied at such time, the required closing date may be extended until March 31, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company extended the required closing date with AgEagle to March 31, 2018.

On November 21, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) signed a binding commitment letter with the Company to provide prior to or at the closing of the Merger, a minimum of $4 million in new equity capital at a pre-money valuation of between $16 million and $25 million (the “Private Placement”). Per the terms of this commitment letter, in the event any unaffiliated third parties of EnerJex participate in the Private Placement, Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall be reduced by such aggregate gross dollar amount funded by such unaffiliated third parties. Alpha has also agreed to convert all notes they hold from the Company into equity at the closing of the Merger. For their funding commitment, Alpha will receive a fee equal to 2.5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis payable at the closing of the Merger. Alpha’s obligations to fund the Private Placement shall terminate on the earlier to occur of (i) the consummation of the Merger, and (ii) March 31, 2018. The Company further agreed that, at no time from the date hereof until the consummation of the Merger, shall it provide or disclose to Alpha any “material non-public information” regarding itself, without the prior consent of Alpha. The funding of the Private Placement is subject to standard conditions such as accuracy of representations and warranties provided in the Merger Agreement, and other similar conditions.

Financing Transactions

On February 10, 2017, the Company, TCB and IberiaBank (collectively, “Sellers”), and PWCM Investment Company IC LLC, and certain financial institutions (collectively, “Buyers”) entered into a Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”), pursuant to which Sellers sold to Buyers, and Buyers purchased from Sellers, all of Sellers’ right, title and interest in, to and under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $5,000,000 (the “Cash Purchase Price”), (ii) a Synthetic Equity Interest equal to 10% of the proceeds, after Buyer’s realization of a 150% return on the Cash Purchase Price within five (5) years of the closing date of the sale, with payment being distributed 65.78947368% to TCB and 34.21052632% to IberiaBank, and (iii) at any time prior to February 10, 2022, Buyer may acquire the interest in clause (ii) above. In connection with the LSA, the Company released Sellers and its successors as holders of the rights under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents, including Buyers, from any and all claims under the Credit Agreement and Loan Documents. 


Also on February 10, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries, and successor lender entered into a binding letter agreement dated February 10, 2017, which was subsequently amended on March 30, 2017 (as amended, the “letter agreement”) pursuant to which:

1.the successor lender agreed to forgive our existing secured loan in the approximate principal amount of $17,295,000, and in exchange entered into a secured promissory note (which we refer to as the “restated secured note”) in the original principal amount of $4,500,000.
2.we:
a.conveyed our oil and gas properties and associated performance and surety bonds in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska;
b.conveyed all of our shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc. (together, the “conveyed oil and gas assets”); and
c.retained our assets in Kansas and continued as a going concern. The Kansas assets currently provide most of our current operating revenue.

The restated secured note:

a.is secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s oil and gas producing assets situated in the State of Kansas,
b.evidences accrued interest on the $4,500,000 principal balance at a rate of 16% per annum,
c.bears interest from and after May 1, 2017, at a rate of 16.0% per annum,
d.is pre-payable in full at a discount at any time during the term of the restated secured note upon EnerJex paying $3,300,000 to successor lender, and
e.matures and is due and payable in full on November 1, 2017 (subject to the extension right described below).

The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018. We have an option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

So long as we repay the $3,300,000 in indebtedness on or prior to the maturity date, as extended, all other amounts payable under the restated secured note are to be forgiven.

The closing occurred on May 10, 2017. As part of the closing procedures and net settlement, we issued a promissory note to Pass Creek Resources LLC in the amount of $105,806. The promissory bears interest at 16% per annum and matured on June 9, 2017. The amount due was not paid on June 9, 2017, but the holder has not provided the Company a notice of default.

In connection with the May 10, 2017 closing and in consideration of the satisfaction of $13,425,000 of the amount due under the Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries transferred to PCR Holdings LLC, an affiliate of the successor lenders under the Credit Agreement, all of the Company’s oil and gas properties and assets located in Colorado, Texas, and Nebraska, as well as the Company’s shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.

To evidence the Company’s remaining $4,500,000 of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million as described above.

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts, pursuant to which the Company guarantees its subsidiaries’ payment of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and waste of the Kansas oil properties or assets.


On December 22, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are parties to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Date of the Loan has been extended to the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a) the Company provide notice to the Administrative Agent of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following delivery of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the merger of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of the First Amendment, the Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has the option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the next twelve months following the issuance of these financial statements. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 - Equity Transactions

Stock transactions in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

We accrued dividends of $3,518,430 for our Series A Preferred Stock for the year ended December 31 2017. At December 31, 2017, aggregate accumulated dividends payable to the Series A Preferred Stock holders totaled $6,919,579.

On April 27, 2017, the Company entered into an Additional Issuance Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt, for the purchase of 300 restricted shares of its newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in consideration for $300,000, with an option to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had issued 300 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000. In addition, during the year ending December 31, 2017, the Company had received $200,000 from Alpha Capital Anstalt to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2017, the additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock have not been issued and are reflected as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Issuable on the balance sheet in the aggregate amount of $200,000.

The Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature of $208,500 based on the fair value of the common stock and the conversion rate as of the date of issuance. This amount was recorded as a deemed distribution for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”) is non-voting (except to the extent required by law and except for certain consent rights relating to amending the certificate of incorporation or bylaws, and the like), ranks senior to the common stock with respect to dividends and with respect to distributions upon a deemed dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company, and ranks junior to the Company’s Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock with respect to dividends and with respect to distributions upon a deemed dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company. Upon request of the holders, the Company can seek stockholder approval to remove the Issuance Limitation described therein and to allow for further adjustments related to anti-dilution protection, only if such stockholder approval is obtained. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and is convertible at the option of the holder at a conversion price equal to $0.30 per share, or a ratio equal to approximately 3,333 shares of common stock for each one (1) share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to customary adjustments. Dividends are payable on the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock only if and to the extent that dividends are payable on the common stock into which the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock has no maturity date and can be redeemed by the Company beginning twelve months after the closing of the offering or upon a change of control for the redemption price of $1,000 per share, as adjustable as provided in the designation of the Series C PreferredCommon Stock.

 

The Series C preferred stock anti-dilution protection was initially triggered on December 27, 2018 as a result of the Company issuing the Series D Preferred Stock, includes(the “Series D Preferred Stock”) as described below. The Series D Preferred Stock had a beneficial ownership limitation preventing$0.54 conversion price thereby qualifying as a subsequent equity offering at a price less than $1.53.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) converted a total of 1,161 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into more than 9.99% of the number of2,150,000 shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect toCommon Stock at a conversion price of $.54.

During the month of January 2020, Alpha converted 189 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into 350,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.54.

On April 7, 2020, upon the issuance of shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series CE Preferred Stock. In addition, the Company may not convertStock, (the “Series E Preferred Stock”) offering (see below), a subsequent anti-dilution provision was triggered for the Series C Preferred Stock into a number ofwhereby the conversion price was further adjusted from $0.54 per share to $0.25 per share (a “Down Round), which resulted in approximately 13,248,000 shares of common stock which, when aggregated with any sharesbeing issuable upon conversion of the remaining Series C Preferred Stock. As a result of this Down Round being triggered, the Company recorded a deemed dividend in the amount of $3,841,920 representing the intrinsic spread between the previous conversion price of $.54 and the adjusted conversion price of $.25 multiplied by 13,248,000 common stock issued on or aftershares issuable upon conversion. The deemed dividend was recorded as a reduction of retained earnings and increase in additional paid-in-capital and increased the original issue date and priornet loss to such conversion datecommon stockholders by the same amount in connection with any conversioncomputing earnings per share.

During the month of April 2020, Alpha converted 3,312 shares of Series C Preferred Stock would exceed 1,683,944into 13,247,984 shares of common stock (19.99%Common Stock at a conversion price of the outstanding shares as$0.25. As of the original issue date), subject to adjustment for forward and reverse stock splits, recapitalizations and the like. In the event conversion of theDecember 31, 2020, no Series C Preferred Stock is limited pursuant to these provisions, each holder shall be entitled to a pro rata portion of the issuable maximum.remain issued and outstanding.

 

Pursuant toSeries D Preferred Stock

On December 27, 2018, the anti-dilutive provisions of theCompany entered into Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 11, 2015, which requires the Company to issue additional shares of common stock to adjust the purchase price paid by purchasers in the Company’s March 2015 offering, in the event any shares are sold (or convertible securities are sold),(the “Series D Purchase Agreement”) with a price per share less than the purchase price paid by the March 2015 purchasers subjectan Investor (the “Purchaser”). Pursuant to the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, Alpha Capital Anstalt received 597,461 sharesthe Board of common stock, whichDirectors of the Company recorded as(the “Board”) designated a $300,000 deemed distribution In addition,new series of preferred stock, the Series B ConvertibleD Preferred Stock, conversion ratio equalwhich is non-convertible and provides for an 8% annual dividend and is subject to approximately 571optional redemption by the Company (the “Preferred Stock”). The Company issued 2,000 shares of common stock for each one (1) share of Preferred Stock resetand a warrant (the “Warrant”) to approximately 3,333purchase 3,703,703 shares of common stockthe Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share of Common Stock, for $2,000,000 in gross proceeds. The shares of Common Stock underling the Warrant are referred to as the “Warrant Shares”. The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) granting registration rights to the Purchaser with respect to the Series D Warrant Shares.

The Series D Purchase Agreement provides that upon a subsequent financing or financings with net proceeds of at least $500,000, the Company must exercise its optional redemption of the Preferred Stock and apply any and all net proceeds from such financing(s) to the redemption in full of the Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock is nonconvertible, provides for an 8% annual dividend payable semi-annually, and has liquidation rights senior to the Common Stock, but pari passu with the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock has no voting rights, except that the Company shall not undertake certain corporate actions as set forth in the Certificate of Designation that would materially impact the holders of Preferred Stock without their consent.

The Preferred Stock is subject to optional redemption by the Company at 115% of the stated value of the Preferred Stock outstanding at the time of such redemption, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends and all liquidated damages or other amounts due. Any such optional redemption may only be exercised after giving notice and upon satisfaction of certain equity conditions set forth in the Certificate of Designation, including (i) all dividends, liquidated damages and other amounts have been paid; (ii) there is an effective registration statement covering the Warrant Shares, or the Warrant Shares can be exercised through a cashless exercise without restriction under Rule 144, (iii) the Warrant Shares are listed on an exchange, (iv) the holder is not in possession of material, non-public information, (v) there is a sufficient number of authorized shares for issuance of all Warrant Shares, and (vi) for each one (1) sharetrading day in a period of Series B Convertible Preferred20 consecutive trading days prior to the redemption date, the daily trading volume for the Common Stock to be consistent withon the termsprincipal trading market exceeds $200,000 per trading day.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 8 – Equity – Continued

 On April 7, 2020, upon the issuance of the Series C ConvertibleE Preferred Stock, pursuant(the “Series E Preferred Stock”) offering (see below), a subsequent anti-dilution provision was triggered for the Series D Warrants whereby the exercise price of the Warrant Shares was adjusted from $0.54 to $0.25 per share (a “Warrant Down Round). Upon the Warrant Down Round being triggered, the Company recognized $208,918 of a deemed dividend for the difference between the fair value of the original warrants right before modification and the fair value of the modified warrants. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following assumptions: expected life of 3.5 years, expected dividend rate of 0%, volatility of 90.0%, and an interest rate of 0.29%. The deemed dividend to the anti-dilution requirementspreferred stockholders was a recorded as additional paid in capital and a reduction of retained earnings and as an increase to net loss attributable to Common Stockholders in computing earnings per share on the consolidated statements of operations.

On June 5, 2020, the Company and Alpha entered into a letter agreement whereby they agreed to amend the Original Series D Preferred Stock and terminate the Series D Purchase Agreement. Alpha is a current holder of less than 10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock and has no material relationship with the Company.

On June 5, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the Original Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation for Nevada Profit Corporations with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada (the “Original Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation”). The amendment among other things, (i) provided for the ability of the Holder to convert the Original Series D, including all accrued, but unpaid dividends on the Original Series D, into shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share of the Company, (ii) set a conversion price at $0.54 per share (subject to customary adjustments), and (iii) increased the stated value of the Original Series D from $1,000 to $1,116.67. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of the Series B ConvertibleD Preferred Stock. Stock was filed with the Secretary of the State of Nevada effective as of June 8, 2020.

The holder of the Original Series D approved the amendment to the Original Series D. There is no class or series of stock which is senior to the Original Series D as to the payment of distributions upon dissolution of the Company, and therefore the approval of any other class or series of stock of the Company to the amendments to the Original Series D Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation is not required pursuant to Nevada law.

On the date of the above amendment to the Original Series D Preferred Stock the fair value of the Company’s Common Stock price was $1.45 which is higher than the effective conversion price of $0.54 that was agreed to on June 5, 2020. Due to the modification of the Series D Preferred Stock, the Company recorded a deemed distributiondividend of $2,500,000 related$3,763,591 representing the intrinsic value of $0.91 multiplied by the number of Common Stock shares to be issued upon conversion. The deemed dividend to the down round triggering eventpreferred stockholders was a recorded as additional paid in capital and a reduction of retained earnings and has an increase to net loss attributable to Common Stockholders in computing earnings per share.

During the month of June 2020, the Series D Preferred Stockholder converted 1,890 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and all outstanding accrued dividends totaling $233,333 into 3,500,000 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.54.

 During the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Series D Preferred Stockholders converted the remaining 110 shares of the Series B ConvertibleD Preferred Stock. In addition, the warrants strikeStock into 635,815 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $2.75 reset$0.54 which includes an additional 421,308 of Common Stock shares to $0.30, to be consistent withcorrect conversions that occurred in June 2020 computed using the termsstated value of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, pursuant to the anti-dilution requirements of the warrants. The Company recorded a deemed distribution of $500,000 related to the down round triggering event of the warrants.$1,000 rather than $1,116.67.

 


During, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted 1,412 shares of AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 8 – Equity – Continued

Series B ConvertibleE Preferred Stock into 5,502,066 shares of common stock.

 

On October 23, 2017,April 7, 2020, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Series E Purchase Agreement”) with Alpha, Capital Anstalt exercised warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate exercise price of $300,000 (or $0.30 per share), pursuant to the terms of such warrants, and was issued 1,000,000the agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized 1,050 shares of common stock.

On November 6, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt exercised warrants to purchase 771,428 sharesa newly designated series of our commonpreferred stock, for an aggregate exercise price of $231,429 (or $0.30 per share), pursuant to the terms of such warrants, and was issued 771,428 shares of common stock.

On December 20, 2017 the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement for the sale of 1,061,750 shares of its Series AE Convertible Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock was sold to Alpha Capital Anstaltconvertible at $0.0612$0.25 per share orinto an aggregate of $649,791. Pursuant4,200,000 shares of the Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share. The purchase price for the Preferred Stock was $1,050,000 of which the Company received net proceeds of $1,010,000. The Preferred Stock has liquidation rights senior to the anti-dilutive provisions of the Series B PreferredCommon Stock, but pari passu with the Series C Preferred Stock and the warrants, theSeries D Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock has no voting rights. The conversion price adjusts for stock splits and strike price reset from $0.30combinations and is subject to $0.612.anti-dilution protection for subsequent equity issuances until such time as no shares of Series E Preferred Stock are outstanding. The Company recorded a deemed distributionCertificate of $100,000 related to the down round triggering eventDesignation of the Series BE Convertible Preferred Stock was filed with the Series C PreferredState of Nevada on April 2, 2020. The Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, granting registration rights to Alpha with respect to the Conversion Shares and Common Stock and theunderlying warrants in the aggregate.currently owned by Alpha.

 

On February 13, 2018,the date that the Series E Preferred Stock was consummated the fair value of the Company’s Common Stock price was $0.37 which is higher than the effective conversion price of $0.25 that was agreed to on April 7, 2020. As a result, the Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) of $378,240 on 788 of Preferred Shares representing the intrinsic value of $.12 multiplied by the number of Common Stock shares to be issued upon conversion. The remaining amount of 262 shares was repurchased as described below. The discount to the Series E Preferred Stock resulting from the BCF has been presented as an increase to net loss attributable to Common Stockholders in computing earnings per share on the consolidated statements of operations.

On May 11, 2020, the Company entered into a Series E Purchase Agreement for the sale of Common Stock as described above with Alpha whereby we agreed to repurchase 262 shares of Series E Preferred Stock with the proceeds from the new issuance. The repurchase of the Preferred Series E Stock was convertible into 1,048,000 shares of Common Stock at a repurchase price of $1.06 per share. The Company increased its net loss available to Common Stockholders in computing earnings per share for the excess of the consideration paid for the Series E Preferred Stock over its carrying value totaling $848,880. As of December 31, 2020, no Series E Preferred Stock remain issued and outstanding.

Capital Stock Issuances

On May 3, 2019, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with GreenBlock Capital LLC (“Consultant”) (see Note 10). As compensation for the services under the terms of the agreement, Consultant can receive (i) $25,000 per month during the term of the agreement, (ii) 500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock upon execution of the agreement, and (iii) up to 2,500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock upon the achievement of predetermined milestones.

On June 18, 2019, the Company issued Alpha Capital Anstalt the 200,000500,000 shares of its Common Stock to the Consultant. The Company recognized a total of $170,000 of consulting expense at a fair value of $0.34 per share within general and administrative costs related to these issuances.

On June 30, 2020, the Company issued an additional 250,000 shares of its Common Stock to the Consultant. The Company recognized a total of $297,500 of expense at a fair value of $1.19 per share within professional fees related to these issuances.

 On June 18, 2019, the Company issued in connection with an investor relations agreement, dated April 4, 2018, 50,000 shares of its Common Stock to the investor relations firm. The Company recognized a total of $20,500 of investor relations expense at a fair value of $0.41 per share within general and administrative costs related to these issuances. This agreement was terminated in March 2019.

In June 2019, as part of the Agribotix acquisition, the Company issued 175,000 common stock shares to be placed in escrow; on February 14, 2020, the Company received 164,374 of those shares in exchange for a release of the terms outlined per the agreement.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 8 – Equity – Continued

Securities Purchase Agreement Dated May 11, 2020

On May 11, 2020, the Company and an Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “May Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering 2,400,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001, and pre-funded warrants (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase up to 3,260,377 shares of Common Stock, for gross proceeds of approximately $6 million (which includes subsequent payment of the exercise price of the Pre-Funded Warrants in the amount of $3,267). The purchase price for each share of Common Stock was $1.06 and the purchase price for each Pre-Funded Warrant was $1.05999. The exercise price for each Warrant was $0.001. Net proceeds from the sale were used to repurchase 262 shares of the Company’s Series C ConvertibleE Preferred Stock, which it was due pursuantconvertible into 1,048,000 shares of Common Stock currently held by the Investor at a repurchase price of $1.06 per share of Common Stock (see below). The Company expects to use the balance for working capital and general corporate purposes. The Company increased net loss available to Common Stockholders in computing earnings per share for the excess of the consideration paid for the Series E Preferred Stock over its carrying value totaling $848,880 as presented on the consolidated statements of operations.

Pursuant to the terms of the May Purchase Agreement, the Company had agreed to certain restrictions on future stock offerings, including that during the 60-day period following the closing, the Company did not issue (or enter into any agreement to issue) any shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents, subject to certain exceptions. The exercise price of the Warrants and the shares of the Common Stock issuable upon the exercise thereof were subject to adjustment in the event of any stock dividends and splits, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization or similar transaction, as described in the Warrants, and were exercisable on a “cashless” basis in certain circumstances.

Securities Purchase Agreement Dated June 24, 2020

On June 24, 2020, the Company and the Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “June Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering 4,407,400 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001, pre-funded warrants to purchase up to 1,956,236 shares of Common Stock, and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to 2,455,476 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.35 per share, for gross proceeds of $7 million (which includes subsequent payment of the exercise price of the Pre-Funded Warrants in the amount of $1,956) and net proceeds of $6,950,000 after issuance costs. Upon exercise of the Warrants in full by the Investor, the Company will receive additional gross proceeds of $3,314,892. The shares of Common Stock underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants and the Warrants are referred to as “June Warrant Shares.”

The purchase price for each share of Common Stock is $1.10 and the purchase price for each Pre-Funded Warrant is $1.099. The exercise price for each Pre-Funded Warrant is $0.001. Net proceeds from the sale will be used for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. The Shares, Pre-funded Warrants, Warrants and June Warrant Shares are being offered by the Company pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239157), which was declared effective on June 19, 2020.

Pursuant to the terms of the June Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to certain restrictions on future stock offerings, including that during the 75-day period following the closing, the Company will not issue (or enter into any agreement to issue) any shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents, subject to certain exceptions, including if the consolidated closing price on the trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is traded at the time is greater than $1.90 (adjusted for any subsequent stock splits or similar capital adjustments) for five consecutive trading days, the Company may issue such securities at not less than $1.90 per Common Stock Equivalent. The Investor has a right from the date of the June Purchase Agreement until December 31, 2020 to participate in a subsequent financing by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of Common Stock or Common Stock Equivalents for cash consideration, indebtedness or a combination of units thereof (a “Subsequent Financing”), in an amount equal to 50% of the Subsequent Financing on the same terms, conditions and price provided for in the Subsequent Financing.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 8 – Equity – Continued

The exercise price of the Prefunded Warrants and the Warrants and the number of June Warrant Shares issuable upon the exercise thereof will be subject to adjustment in the event of any stock dividends and splits, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization or similar transaction, as described in the Prefunded Warrants and the Warrants. The Warrants will be exercisable on a “cashless” basis only in the event there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for the sale of the shares underlying the Warrants. The Pre-Funded Warrants allow for cashless exercise at any time. The Pre-Funded Warrants and the Warrants each contain a beneficial ownership limitation, such that none of such Pre-Funded Warrants nor the Warrants may be exercised, if, at the time of such exercise, the holder would become the beneficial owner of more than 9.99% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock following the exercise of such Pre-Funded Warrant or Warrant. During the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company received $3,314,893 in additional gross proceeds associated with exercise of 2,455,476 of the June Warrant Shares into Common Stock.

Securities Purchase Agreement Dated August 4, 2020

On August 4, 2020, the Company and an Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “August Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering 3,355,705 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase up to 2,516,778 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.30 per share (the “August Warrants”), for proceeds of $9,900,000 net of issuance costs of $100,000. Upon exercise of the Warrants in full by the Investor, the Company will receive additional gross proceeds of $8,305,367. The shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants are referred to as “August Warrant Shares.”

The purchase price for each share of Common Stock is $2.98. Net proceeds from the sale will be used for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. The shares, the August Warrants and the August Warrant Shares are being offered by the Company pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239157), which was declared effective on June 19, 2020.

Pursuant to the terms of the August Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to certain restrictions on future stock offerings, including that during the 75-day period following the closing, the Company will not issue (or enter into any agreement to issue) any shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents, subject to certain exceptions, including if the consolidated closing price on the trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is traded at the time is greater than $5.00 (adjusted for any subsequent stock splits or similar capital adjustments) for ten consecutive trading days, the Company may issue such securities at not less than $5.00 per Common Stock Equivalent. In addition, the Company’s executive officers and directors agreed that they shall not sell (or hedge in any manner) any of their shares of the Common Stock for a period ending September 7, 2020. The Investor has a right from the date of the August Purchase Agreement until December 31, 2020, to participate in a subsequent financing by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of Common Stock or Common Stock Equivalents for cash consideration, indebtedness or a combination of units thereof (a “Subsequent Financing”), in an amount equal to 50% of the Subsequent Financing on the same terms, conditions and price provided for in the Subsequent Financing.

The exercise price of the August Warrants and the number of August Warrant Shares issuable upon the exercise thereof will be subject to adjustment in the event of any stock dividends and splits, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization or similar transaction, as described in the Warrants. The Warrants will be exercisable on a “cashless” basis only in the event there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for the sale of the shares underlying the August Warrants. The August Warrants contain a beneficial ownership limitation, such that none of such August Warrants may be exercised, if, at the time of such exercise, the holder would become the beneficial owner of more than 9.99% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock following the exercise of such August Warrant. The August Warrant is for a ten-month term and is not exercisable for the first six months.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 8 – Equity – Continued

Securities Purchase Agreement Dated December 31, 2020

On December 31, 2020, the Company, and an Investor entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “December Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Investor in a registered direct offering pre-funded warrants (the “December Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase up to 1,057,214 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 Common Stock, for gross proceeds of approximately $6.375 million (which includes subsequent payment of the exercise price of the December Pre-Funded Warrants in the amount of $1,057. The shares of Common Stock underlying the December Pre-Funded Warrants are referred to as the “December Warrant Shares.”

The purchase price for each December Pre-Funded Warrant is $6.029, the exercise price for each December Pre-Funded Warrant is $0.001. Net proceeds from the sale will be used for working capital. The December Pre-Funded Warrants and the December Warrant Shares are being offered by the Company pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-239157), which was declared effective on June 19, 2020.

Pursuant to the terms of the December Purchase Agreement, the Company has agreed to certain restrictions on future stock offerings, including that during the 45-trading day period following the closing, the Company will not issue (or enter into any agreement to issue) any shares of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents, subject to certain limited exceptions. The Investor has a right from the date of the December Purchase Agreement until April 30, 2021 to participate in a subsequent financing by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents for cash consideration, indebtedness or a combination of units thereof (a “Subsequent Financing”), in an amount equal to 50% of the Subsequent Financing on the same terms, conditions and price provided for in the Subsequent Financing.

The exercise price of the December Prefunded Warrants and the number of December Warrant Shares issuable upon the exercise thereof will be subject to adjustment in the event of any stock dividends and splits, reverse stock split, recapitalization, reorganization or similar transaction, as described in the December Prefunded Warrants. The December Pre-Funded Warrants allow for cashless exercise at any time. The December Pre-Funded Warrants contain a beneficial ownership limitation such that none of the December Pre-Funded Warrants may be exercised, if, at the time of such exercise, the holder would become the beneficial owner of more than 9.99% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock following the exercise of such December Pre-Funded Warrants.

Filing of Registration Statement

Pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement executed on April 7, 2020, the Company filed an initial registration statement registering the Conversion Shares and the April Warrant Shares on April 27, 2017, Additional Issuance Agreement,2020. The Company’s registration statement was declared effective May 6, 2020.

Issuances of Restricted Stock Units

On April 13, 2020, the Company issued in considerationconnection with the 2019 Executive Compensation Plan, 100,000 restricted shares to Mr. Barrett Mooney and 70,000 restricted shares to Ms. Nicole Fernandez-McGovern. The Company recognized a total of $59,500 of expense at a fair value of $0.35 per share within stock compensation expense related to these issuances for the $200,000year ended December 31, 2020 which is included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 8 – Equity – Continued

On May 18, 2020, the company issued in connection with the commencement of the Chief Executive officer, 100,000 shares of restricted stock units under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), which will fully vest after one year of continued employment. The Company determined the fair-market value of the restricted stock units to be $134,000. In connection with the issuance of these restricted stock units, the Company recognized $82,786 in stock compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 which is included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

The remaining unrecognized stock compensation expense of $51,214 will be recognized through May 2021.

Options

On March 26, 2018, the EnerJex 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) became effective. Under the Plan, the Company can grant equity-based and other incentive awards to officers, employees, and directors of, and consultants and advisers to, the Company. The purpose of the Plan is to help the Company attract, motivate, and retain such persons and thereby enhance shareholder value. The Plan shall continue in effect, unless sooner terminated, until the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date on which it is adopted by the Board of Directors (except as to awards outstanding on that date). The Board of Directors in its discretion may terminate the Plan at any time with respect to any shares for which awards have not theretofore been granted; provided, however, that the Plan’s termination shall not materially and adversely impair the rights of a holder, without the consent of the holder, with respect to any award previously granted. On June 18, 2019, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company, the shareholders approved a proposal to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan from 2,000,000 to 3,000,000.

On July 15, 2020, the Company held its 2020 annual meeting of stockholders and approved a proposal to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan from 3,000,000 to 4,000,000. To the extent that an award lapses, expires, is canceled, is terminated unexercised or ceases to be exercisable for any reason, or the rights of its holder terminate, any shares subject to such award shall again be available for the grant of a new award. The number of shares for which awards which are options or SARs may be granted to a participant under the Plan during any calendar year is limited to 500,000. For purposes of qualifying awards as “performance-based” compensation under Code Section 162(m), the maximum amount of cash compensation that may be paid to any person under the Plan in any single calendar year shall be $500,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued options to purchase 876,167 shares of Common Stock to directors and employees of the Company at exercise prices ranging from $0.41 to $6.00 per share expiring on dates between February 23, 2025 and December 30, 2025. The Company determined the fair-market value of the options to be $1,577,099. In connection with the issuance of these options to employees and directors, the Company recognized $102,771 in stock compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2020.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued options to purchase 1,131,000 shares of Common Stock to directors and employees of the Company at exercise prices ranging from $0.29 to $0.54 per share expiring on dates between December 31, 2023 and March 28, 2029. The Company determined the fair-market value of the options to be $269,700. In connection with the issuance of these options to employees and directors, the Company recognized 126,319 and $58,491 in stock compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued options to purchase 534,598 shares of Common Stock to directors and employees of the Company at exercise prices ranging from $0.51 to $4.33 per share expiring on dates between March 30, 2023 and December 15, 2028. The Company determined the fair-market value of the options to be $387,052. In connection with the issuance of these options to employees and directors, the Company recognized $31,548 and $196,485 in stock compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 8 – Equity – Continued

On October 4, 2017, AgEagle Sub issued options to purchase 927,775 shares of Common Stock to employees and directors, that were approved by the Board at an exercise price of $0.06 per share. These options were assumed by the Company in the Merger. In connection with the issuance of these options to employees and directors, the Company recognized $(1,622) and $5,335 in stock compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

In addition to the share issues to the Consultant as a part the May 2019 contract, the Consultant also held options to purchase 207,055 shares of the Company’s common stock per the previously engaged agreement executed by the Company between March 2015 and August 2016 to provide consulting services. The options were cashless exercised at a price of $0.06 per share on July 20, 2020 into 201,791 shares of common stock. 

The fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2017.2020 and 2019 were determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The expected term of options granted is based on the simplified method in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company makes assumptions with respect to expected stock price volatility based on the average historical volatility of peers with similar attributes. In addition, the Company determines the risk-free rate by selecting the U.S. Treasury with maturities similar to the expected terms of grants, quoted on an investment basis in effect at the time of grant for that business day.

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted (a) 343.671 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 5,610,955 shares of common stock; and (b) 103.142 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,683,944 shares of common stock, pursuantThe significant assumptions relating to the termsvaluation of such securities.

Stock transactions in fiscalthe Company’s stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 20162020 were as follows:

 

December 31, 2020
Dividend yield0.00%
Expected life3.8 Years
Expected volatility87.11%
Risk-free interest rate0.19%

There were no equity transactions

A summary of the options activity for the year ended December 31, 2016.2020 is as follows:

 

Option transactions

  Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2020  2,480,470  $0.39   6.28 years   $378,111 
Granted  876,167   3.27   4.71 years   2,392,368 
Exercised  (881,898)  0.19      4,141,581 
Expired/Forfeited  (219,472)  1.63      927,616 
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  2,255,267   1.46   5.31 years  10,247,548 
Exercisable at period end  1,097,268  $0.38   5.58 years $6,164,209 

 

Officers (including officers who are membersFor options granted during the year ended December 31, 2020, the fair value of the BoardCompany’s stock was based upon the close of Directors), directors, employees and consultants are eligible to receive options under our stock option plans.  We administer the stock option plans and we determine those persons to whom options will be granted, the number of options to be granted, the provisions applicable to each grant and the time periods during which the options may be exercised.  No options may be granted more than ten years after the date of the adoption of the stock option plans.

Each option granted under the stock option plans will be exercisable for a term of not more than ten years aftermarket price on the date of grant. Certain other restrictions will applyThe future expected stock-based compensation expense expected to be recognized in connection with the plans when some awards may be exercised.  In the event of a change of control (as defined in the stock option plans), the vesting date on which all options outstanding under the stock option plans may first be exercised will be accelerated.  Generally, all options terminate 90 days after a change of control. future years is $1,474,328 through December 31, 2022.

 

Stock Incentive PlanIntrinsic value is measured using the fair market value at the date of exercise (for shares exercised) or at December 31, 2020 (for outstanding options), less the applicable exercise price.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

 

The Board of Directors approved the EnerJex Resources, Inc. Stock Option Plan on August 1, 2002 (the “2002-2003 Stock Option Plan”). Originally, the total number of options that could be granted under the 2002-2003 Stock Option Plan was not to exceed 26,666 shares. In September 2007 our stockholders approved a proposal to amend and restate the 2002-2003 Stock Option Plan to increase the number of shares issuable to 66,666.  On October 14, 2008 our stockholders approved a proposal to amend and restate the 2002-2003 Stock Option Plan to (i) rename it the EnerJex Resources, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”), (ii) increase the maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the Stock Incentive Plan to 83,333, and (iii) add restricted stock as an eligible award that can be granted under the Stock Incentive Plan.Note 8 – Equity – Continued

 

2013 Stock Incentive Plan

The Board and stockholders approved the adoptionA summary of the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”). The Plan reserves 333,300 shares of our common stock for the granting of options and issuance of restricted shares to our employees, officers, directors, and consultants. The Plan increases reserved shares annually based on plan provisions.

In 2017 and 2016, no options were granted to any employees or directors.

We expensed $13,690 and $241,669activity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 respectively for options granted.


A summary of stock options2019 is as follows:

 

      Weighted Ave.     Weighted Ave. 
   Options  Exercise Price  Warrants  Exercise Price 
              
Outstanding January 1, 2016   288,331  $10.17   1,904,286  $2.75 
Granted             
Cancelled   (80,667)  (7.15)      
Exercised             
Outstanding December 31, 2016   207,664  $9.69   1,904,286  $2.75 
Granted             
Cancelled          
Exercised   (192,332)  (10.5)  (1,771,428  0.30 
Outstanding December 31, 2017   15,332  $7.63   132,858  $0.30 

The number of options that were vested at December 31, 2017 was 15,332. The were no options that were not vested at December 31, 2017.

Note 4 - Asset Retirement Obligation

Our asset retirement obligations relate to the abandonment of oil and gas wells. The amounts recognized are based on numerous estimates and assumptions, including future retirement costs, inflation rates and credit adjusted risk-free interest rates. The following shows the changes in asset retirement obligations:

Asset retirement obligations, January 1, 2016 $3,091,478 
Liabilities incurred during the period   
Liabilities settled during the year  (2,767)
Accretion  225,480 
Asset retirement obligations, December 31, 2016 $3,314,191 
Release of liabilities  (1,814,408)
Liabilities incurred during the period   
Liabilities settled during the year   
Accretion  112,062 
Asset retirement obligations, December 31, 2017 $1,611,845 

Note 5 - Long-Term Debt

Senior Secured Credit Facility   

      Weighted  
    Weighted Average  
    Average Remaining Aggregate
    Exercise Contractual Intrinsic
  Shares Price Term Value
         
Outstanding at January 1, 2019  1,494,158  $0.46   6.93 years   $417 ,504 
Granted  1,131,000   0.37   6.27 years    
Exercised/Forfeited  (144,688)  0.99   —     
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  2,480,470   0.39   6.28 years   378,111 
Exercisable at end of the year  1,521,859  $0.36   6.10 years  $301,051 

 

On October 3, 2011, the Company, DD Energy, Inc., EnerJex Kansas, Inc., Black Sable Energy, LLC and Working Interest, LLC (collectively, “Borrowers”) entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank, and other financial institutions and banks that may become a party to the Credit Agreement from time to time. The facilities provided under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are to be used to refinance Borrowers prior outstanding revolving loan facility with Bank, dated July 3, 2008, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.

At our option, loans under the facility bear stated interest based on the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin, or Floating Rate plus Floating Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). The Base Rate will be, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the higher of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50% and (b) the Bank’s prime rate. The Floating Rate shall mean, at Borrower’s option, a per annum interest rate equal to (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus Eurodollar Margin, or (ii) the Base Rate plus Base Rate Margin (as those terms are defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement). Eurodollar borrowings may be for one, two, three, or six months, as selected by the Borrowers. The margins for all loans are based on a pricing grid ranging from 0.00% to 0.75% for the Base Rate Margin and 2.25% to 3.00% for the Floating Rate Margin based on the Company’s Borrowing Base Utilization Percentage (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).

WeMarch 1, 2015, AgEagle Sub entered into a First Amendmentstrategic consulting agreement with a related party and granted 207,055 stock options exercisable over five years from the grant date at an exercise price per share of $2.60. On October 4, 2017, AgEagle Sub held a board meeting to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note inapprove the amount of $50,000,000 with Texas Capital Bank, which closed on December 15, 2011. The Amendment reflects the addition of Rantoul Partners, as an additional Borrower and adds as additional security for the loans the assets held by Rantoul Partners.

On August 31, 2012, we entered into a Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank. The Second Amendment: (i) increased the borrowing base to $7,000,000, (ii) reduced the minimum interest rate to 3.75%, and (iii) added additional new leases as collateral for the loan.


On November 2, 2012, we entered into a Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Texas Capital Bank. The Third Amendment (i) increased the borrowing base to $12,150,000 and (ii) clarified certain continuing covenants and provided a limited waiver of compliance with onemodification of the covenants so clarified for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011.

On January 24, 2013, we entered into a Fourth Amendmentexisting 207,055 options to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which was made effective aspurchase Common Stock from an exercise price of December 31, 2012 with Texas Capital Bank.  The Fourth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the Bank consented$2.60 to the restructuring transactions related to the dissolution of Rantoul Partners, and (ii) the Bank terminated a Limited Guaranty, as defined in the Credit Agreement, executed by Rantoul Partners in favor of the Bank

On April 16, 2013, the Bank increased our borrowing base to $19.5 million.

On September 30, 2013, we entered into a Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Fifth Amendment reflects the following changes it: (i) expanded the principal commitment amount of the Bank to $100,000,000; (ii) increased the Borrowing Base to $38,000,000; (iii) added Black Raven Energy, Inc. to the Credit Agreement as a borrower party; (iv) added certain collateral and security interests in favor of the Bank; and (v) reduced the interest rate to 3.30%.

On November 19, 2013, we entered into a Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Sixth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the addition of Iberia Bank as a participant in our credit facility, and (ii) a technical correction to our covenant calculations.

On May 22, 2014, we entered into a Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Seventh Amendment reflects the Bank’s consent to our issuance of up to 850,000 shares of our 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock.

On August 15, 2014, we entered into an Eighth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eighth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) the borrowing base was increased from $38 million to $40 million, and (ii) the maturity of the facility was extended by three years to October 3, 2018.

On April 29, 2015, we entered into a Ninth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. In the Ninth Amendment, the Bank (i) re-determined the Borrowing Base based upon the Reserve Report dated January 1, 2015, (ii) imposed affirmative obligations on the Company to use a portion of proceeds received with regard to future sales of securities or certain assets to repay the loan, (iii) consented to non-compliance$0.06 per share. These options were assumed by the Company with certain termsin the Merger and not part of the Credit Agreement, (iv) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, and (v) agreed to certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.

On May 1, 2015, the Borrowers and the Banks entered into a Letter Agreement to clarify that up to $1,000,000 in proceeds from any potential future securities offering will be unencumbered by the Banks’ liens as described in the Credit Agreement through November 1, 2015, and that, until November 1, 2015, such proceeds would not be subject to certain provisions in the Credit Agreement prohibitingcompensation plan. In connection with these options, the Company from declaring and paying dividends that may be due and payable to holders of securities issued in such potential offerings or issued prior to the Letter Agreement.

On August 12, 2015, we entered into a Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Tenth Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) allow the Company to sell certain oil assets in Kansas, (ii) allow for approximately $1,300,000 of the proceeds from the sale to be reinvested in Company owned oil and gas projects and (iii) apply not less than $1,500,000 from the proceed of the sale to outstanding loan balances.

On November 13, 2015, the Company entered into an Eleventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Eleventh Amendment reflects the following changes: (i) waived certain provisions of the Credit Agreement, (ii) suspended certain hedging requirements, and (iii) made certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.

On April 1, 2016, the Company informed the Bank that it would cease making the mandatory monthly borrowing base reduction payments and did not make the required April 1, 2016 payment. The Company made its mandatory quarterly interest payments on April 6, 2016 and May 2, 2016. On April 7, 2016, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement whereby the Bank agreed to not exercise remedies and rights afforded it under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for thirty days. The thirty day period was to be used by the Company to pursue strategic alternatives.

On April 28, 2016 the Bank informed the Company that it would extend the above Forbearance Agreement period to May 31, 2016 upon effecting a principal reduction of $125,000. In addition, the Company will receive an automatic extension to September 15, 2016 upon meeting certain terms and conditions specified by the Bank. On May 31, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to August 31, 2016. On July 29, 2016, the Company and the Bank amended the Forbearance Agreement to extend the forbearance period to October 1, 2016. 


On October 1, 2016, the Company and the Bank could not reach an agreement to extend the Third Amendment to the Forbearance Agreement. Following this outcome, the Company decided to discontinue payment of interest on its outstanding loan obligations with the Bank. The Company continued to evaluate plans to restructure, amend or refinance existing debt through private options.

On February 10, 2017, the Company and the other Sellers entered into and completed the transactions contemplated by the LSA, described in greater detail in “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”.

Below is a table showing the reconciliation of the gain on LSA as set forth on the statement of operationsrecognized no stock compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2017:2020 and they were fully exercised on July 2020.

 

Forgiveness of existing secured loan $17,925,000 
Forgiveness of accrued interest  1,306,801 
Issuance of secured promissory note  (4,500,000)
Transfer of oil and gas properties  (1,902,726)
Transfer of gas gathering system  (1,772,588)
Transfer of shares of Oakridge Energy, Inc.  (210,990)
Transfer of ARO liability  1,814,407 
Transfer of other assets  (1,159,780)
Gain on LSA $11,500,124 

Intrinsic value is measured using the fair market value at the date of exercise (for shares exercised) or at December 31, 2019 (for outstanding options), less the applicable exercise price.

 

To evidenceThe significant assumptions relating to the valuation of the Company’s remaining $4,500,000stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2019 were as follows: 

December 31, 2019
Dividend yield1.62%
Expected life3.0-6.1 Years
Expected volatility82.38-88.62%
Risk-free interest rate1.56-2.23%

For options granted in 2019, the fair value of indebtedness to PWCM Investment Company IC LLC (“PWCM”), RES Investment Group, LLC (“RES”), Round Rock Development Partners, LP (“Round Rock”), and Cibolo Holdings, LLC (“Cibolo Holdings,” and together with PWCM, RES and Round Rock, “Successor Lenders”), the Company’s subsidiaries (except Kansas Holdings, LLC)stock was obtained based upon the close of market price on date of grant.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 9 – Warrants to Purchase Common Stock

Warrants Issued

On June 24, 2020, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions and banks parties thereto (the “New Credit Agreement”), and a related Amended and Restated Note (the “New Note”), in the amount of $3.3 million aspurchase agreement, described above under “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”.  

Our subsidiaries’ obligations under the credit agreement and note are non-recourse and are secured by a first-priority lien in the Company’s and the subsidiaries’ oil properties and assets located in Kansas. The Company was removed as a borrower under the Credit Agreement, but entered into a Guaranty of Recourse Carveouts,Note 7, pursuant to which the Company guaranteesagreed to sell to the Subsidiaries’ paymentInvestor in a registered direct offering June Warrant Shares to purchase up to 2,455,476 shares of certain fees and expenses due under the Credit Agreement, and may be liable for certain conduct, such as fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, and wasteCommon Stock at an exercise price of the Kansas oil properties or assets.$1.35 per share.

 

December 22, 2017,On August 4, 2020, the Company entered into a purchase agreement, described above in Note 7, pursuant to which the First AmendmentCompany agreed to sell to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment) with Pass Creek Resources, LLC (“Pass Creek”) and Cortland Capital Market Services, LLC (“Administration Agent”). The Company, Pass Creek, and Administrative Agent are partiesInvestor in a registered direct offering Warrants to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2017. The Maturity Datepurchase up to 2,516,778 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.30 per share. Upon exercise of the Loan has been extended toWarrants in full by the earlier of (i) February 15, 2018 or April 30, 2018, if (a)Investor, the Company provides notice to the Administrative Agentwill receive additional gross proceeds of their intent to extend the maturity date and (b) no later than the first Business Day following deliveryapproximately $8,305,367. As of such notice pay a $100,000 extension fee, or (ii) the mergerDecember 31, 2020, all of AgEagle Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 19, 2017. At the closing of First Amendment, the Company paid Pass Creek a $65,000 extension fee and $7,500 to the Administrative Agent for additional fees. The Company also paid the Administrative Agent an additional $45,000 upon the filing of a definitive proxy statement by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company also agreed to borrow Improvement Advances in an amount not to exceed $300,000. The Company has extended the restated secured note to March 23, 2018 and has the option to extend the maturity date of the restated secured note to April 30, 2018, upon payment of an extension fee of $50,000.these Warrants remain outstanding.

 

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the principal balanceCompany had outstanding warrants, in connection with the issuance of $4,457,347 alongsecurities purchase agreement dated August 4, 2020, to purchase 2,516,778 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.30 with accrued interestan expiration date on June 6, 2021.

Warrant Conversions

On December 27, 2018, the Company issued 2,000 shares of $479,452 remained due underPreferred Stock and a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 3,703,703 shares of the AmendedCompany’s Common Stock for $2,000,000 in gross proceeds. The shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrant are referred to as the “Warrant Shares.” The Company also entered into a registration rights agreement granting registration rights to the Purchaser with respect to the Warrant Shares.

The Warrant is exercisable for a period of five years through December 26, 2023 at an exercise price equal to $0.54 per share; and Restated Credit Agreement. At December 31,is subject to customary adjustments for stock splits dividend, rights offerings, pro rata distributions and fundamental transactions. In addition, in the event the Company undertakes a subsequent equity financing or financings at an effective price per share that is less than $0.54, the exercise price of the Warrant shall be reduced to the lower price.

On April 7, 2020, upon the issuance of the Series E Preferred Stock, offering, a subsequent anti-dilution provision was triggered for the Series D Warrants whereby the exercise price of the Warrant Shares was adjusted from $0.54 to $0.25 per share a Warrant Down Round (See Note 8).

In connection with an issuance of debentures in 2017, the Company was not in complianceissued a warrant to purchase 828,221 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.51 with certain covenants, and the loan may be called due by Pass Creek. The note is in default.an expiration date on August 2, 2024. These warrants were exercised at a cashless price of $1.51 per share on September 22, 2020 into 405,716 shares of common stock.

 

AsIn July 2020, the Company received $2,632,500 in additional gross proceeds associated with exercise of 1,950,000 of the June Warrant Shares into Common Stock. During December 2020, the Company received $682,393 in additional gross proceeds associated with exercise of 505,476 shares of the June Warrant.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, 6,987,400 warrants were converted into 5,808,931 shares of Common Stock at a weighted average conversion price of $0.79. The Company received cash proceeds of $3,314,893 associated with exercise of the warrants.

All warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $80,805 along with accrued interest of $9,616 remained due under the promissory note with Pass Creek Resources LLC. The note is in default.2020 are scheduled to expire between June 6, 2021.

 

On July 14, 2017, July 28, 2017 and August 30, 2017,A summary of activity related to warrants for the Company entered into Secured Promissory Notes totaling $225,000 with Alpha Capital Anstalt, which have a maturity date of June 30, 2018, and accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The amount due under the notes is secured by a security interest, subordinate to certain other security interests of the Company, in substantially all of the Company's assets. The amount due under the notes is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock, at the option of Alpha Capital Anstalt, on identical terms as the outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (i.e., an initial conversion price of $0.30 per share, a 9.9% ownership limitation and certain anti-dilution rights, which currently result in a conversion price of $0.0612 per share). As ofyear ended December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $225,000 remained due.2020 follows:

 

  Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
Outstanding at January 1, 2020   4,531,924  $0.72   4.05 
Issued   4,972,254   2.34   0.92 
Exercised   (6,987,400)  0.79    
Outstanding at December 31, 2020   2,516,778  $3.30   0.83 
Exercisable at December 31, 2020   2,516,778  $3.30   0.83 

As

A summary of activity related to warrants for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, the principal balance of $113,750 along with accrued interest of $5,574, remained due under the promissory note with Robert Watson, the former CEO. The note is in default.2019 follows:

  Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
Outstanding at January 1, 2019   4,531,924  $0.72   5.05 
Outstanding at December 31, 2019   4,531,924  $0.72   5.05 
Exercisable at December 31, 2019   4,531,924  $0.72   4.05 


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

 

Note 6 -10 – Commitments and Contingencies

 

RentOperating Leases

The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)” along with related clarifications and improvements effective at the beginning of fiscal 2019, using the modified retrospective transition method.

Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease terms at the commencement dates.  The Company uses its incremental borrowing rates as the discount rate for its leases, which is equal to the rate of interest the Company would have to pay on a collateralized basis to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments under similar terms. The incremental borrowing rate for all existing leases as of the opening balance sheet date was based upon the remaining terms of the leases; the incremental borrowing rate for all new or amended leases is based upon the lease terms.  The lease terms for all the Company’s leases include the contractually obligated period of the leases, plus any additional periods covered by a Company options to extend the leases that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise.

Adoption of Topic 842 did not have a material impact on our annual operating results or cash flows. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in operating costs or General and administrative expense.  Variable lease payments are expensed as incurred.

The Company determines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at contract inception and recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date.  Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less but greater than one month are not recorded on the balance sheet for select asset classes.  The lease liability is measured at the present value of future lease payments as of the lease commencement date, or the opening balance sheet date for leases existing at adoption of Topic 842.  The right-of-use asset recognized is based on the lease liability adjusted for prepaid and deferred rent and unamortized lease incentives.

The Company has one operating lease located at 8863 E. 34th Street North, Wichita, Kansas 67226 which serves as our corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility. The commencement date of the lease was November 1, 2020 and will expire on October 31, 2023, unless sooner terminated or extended. The lease which is an operating lease and included in the right-of-use asset, current portion of lease liability, and long-term lease liability captions on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

The aggregate estimated rent payments due over the initial three-year term is $297,000. Operating lease assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $257,363 as of December 31, 2020. Lease expense for lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease terms. The aggregate estimated rent payments due over the option term would be $314,640. Lease expense payment was $48,840 and $30,000 for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 20162019, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

The following is a maturity analysis of the annual undiscounted cash flows of the operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020:

Year Ending December 31, Amount
2021  $85,895 
2022   91,193 
2023   80,275 
   $257,363 

Previously the Company leased manufacturing space located at 117 South 4th Street, Neodesha, Kansas 66757. This served as our corporate headquarters and manufacturing facility. The facility was approximately $69,000a lease of 4,000 square feet at a cost of $600 per month. This lease was officially terminated on November 30, 2020.

As a result of an asset acquisition, the Company assumed a lease for offices in Boulder, Colorado for $2,000 a month. The lease was officially terminated on November 30, 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and $148,000, respectively. Future non-cancellable minimumour intention to protect the health and safety of our employees, our workforce in Colorado has been working from their respective home offices. Once the nation’s vaccination program gains greater momentum or herd immunity is achieved, we do expect to lease payments are approximately, $10,000new commercial office space in or around Denver, Colorado, which may occur later this year.

GreenBlock Capital LLC Consulting Agreement

On May 3, 2019, we entered into a consulting agreement with GreenBlock Capital LLC (“Consultant”) to serve as strategic advisor and consultant with respect to the development of new business opportunities and the implementation of business strategies related to expansion into the emerging domestic hemp cultivation market. The extent of the services will be set forth in separate scopes of work, from time to time, to be prepared and mutually agreed to by the parties. As compensation for 2018.the services under the terms of the agreement, the Consultant can receive (i) $25,000 per month during the term of the agreement, (ii) 500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock upon execution of the agreement and up to (iii) up to 2,500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock upon the achievement of predetermined milestones.

 


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies – Continued

On October 31, 2019, the consulting agreement was terminated as a result of the Company no longer needing these services to be provided by an outside consultant. There are no early termination penalties incurred as a result of the termination of the consulting agreement. The Consultant may still be entitled to receive up to 2,500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock after termination of the Agreement, if the achievement of milestones that commenced during the term of the Agreement are completed after termination.

In February 2021, the Consultant sent a demand letter to the Company alleging a breach of the consulting agreement due to the Company not issuing additional shares of common stock in connection with the Consultant’s alleged achievement of the milestones. At this time the Consultant made a demand for an additional 750,000 shares of common stock to be issued.  Although the Company disputes that the milestones were successfully achieved by the Consultant and believes that no additional shares of common stock are owed, the Company has offered to the Consultant, in the form of a settlement, 250,000 additional shares of common stock. As result the Company has recorded a contingent loss within general & administrative expenses in the aggregate amount of $1,500,000 based upon the fair market value of $6.00 per share of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2017,2020. If the offer is not accepted, and a complaint is filed, the Company has an outstanding irrevocable letter of credit inintends to vigorously defend the amount of $50,000 issued in favor ofmatter to the Texas Railroad Commission. This letter of credit is required by the Commission by all companies operating in the state in accordance with limits prescribed by the Texas Railroad Commission.fullest extent.

 

We, as a lessee and operator of oil and gas properties, are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on the lessee under an oil and gas lease for the cost of pollution clean-up resulting from operations and subject the lessee to liability for pollution damages. In some instances, the Company may be directed to suspend or cease operations in the affected area.  As of December 31, 2017, we have no reserve for environmental remediation and are not aware of any environmental claims.

On September 23, 2016, the Company, American Standard Energy Corporation, Baylor Operating LLC, Bernard Given and Loeb & Loeb LLP were sued by Geronimo Holdings Corporation and Randal Capps in the 143rd Judicial District Court located in Pecos, Texas. The suit among other things, seeks damages for an alleged unlawful sale of properties in Crockett County Texas and for alleged unpaid royalties. The Company believes the suit is without merit and will vigorously defend itself. The Company has faith that it will prevail and at December 31, 2017 no reserve for potential losses arising from this matter has been recorded. Additionally under its agreement with Baylor Operating LLC, Baylor has agreed to indemnify and defend the Company against all lawsuits and claims including this one.Founder Leak-Out Agreement

 

On April 7, 2020, as a condition to the consummation of the Series E Preferred Agreement, the Company entered into a Leak-Out Agreement with Mr. Bret Chilcott, founder and former director and President of the Company, and Alpha with respect to the shares Mr. Chilcott beneficially owns. The restriction on the disposition of the shares is for a period of seven months from the date of the closing of the agreement. Thereafter, for a period of an additional six months, Mr. Chilcott may sell no more than $25,000 per calendar month of shares of Company Common Stock.

On August 26, 2016, C&F Ranch, LLC sued2020, the Company, together with Mr. Chilcott and Alpha Capital Anstalt, who was a party to the Leak Out Agreement, agreed to amend the Leak Out Agreement to change the restrictions on the disposition of Mr. Chilcott’s shares that are subject to the Leak Out Agreement (the “Amended Leak Out Agreement”). The Amended Leak Out Agreement provides that Mr. Chilcott (together with his affiliates) may sell or otherwise dispose of his shares for a period of twelve (12) months commencing on September 7, 2020 (the “Restricted Period”) in an amount representing no more than 50,000 shares per calendar month during the Restricted Period. After the Restricted Period, the restrictions set forth in the Amended Leak Out Agreement cease.

Approval of Compensation-by-Compensation Committee

Mr. Barrett Mooney and Mr. Brett Chilcott resigned from their roles with the Company, effective May 5, 2020. Mr. Mooney now serves as Chairman of the Board, and Mr. Chilcott no longer serves as management of the Company.

On April 16, 2020, the Compensation Committee agreed to the following terms:

Mr. Barrett Mooney:

Mr. Mooney was entitled to receive his current salary and benefits between the dates of March 6, 2020 and April 4, 2020. In addition, Mr. Mooney will be paid $50,000 in cash, $25,000 of which was paid in a lump sum in April 2020 and the balance will be paid in equal installments over a six-month period beginning on May 5, 2020. Mr. Mooney will remain eligible to receive bonuses of up to $15,000, as approved by the Board of Directors based on certain revenue and operational targets being achieved. Commencing May 5, 2020 when he accepted the appointment as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Mooney is entitled to receive (i) a quarterly grant of 16,500 stock options at the fair market value of the stock on the issuance date, vesting over two years and exercisable for a period of five years; and (ii) reimbursement for travel expenses. Mr. Mooney has agreed to also provide the Company with consulting services, as needed, at a fixed price of $4,500 per month on a month-to-month basis, plus reimbursement for travel expenses.

Mr. Barrett Mooney, who is currently the Chairman of the Board, received a monthly fee for consulting services he provided to the Company in Allen County Kansas2020, which was outside of his role as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Mooney’s consulting fee increased to $10,000 per month from August 1, 2020 ending on November 30, 2020.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies – Continued

Mr. Bret Chilcott:

Mr. Chilcott is entitled to receive a base annual salary of $140,000, plus benefits, for alleged breachthe twelve-month period commencing May 5, 2020 and ending May 4, 2021. Subsequent to May 4, 2021, Mr. Chilcott can provide the Company with consulting services, as needed, at a fixed fee of contract$4,500 per month on a month-to-month basis plus reimbursement of travel expenses.

Appointment of Chief Executive Officer and Changes to Compensatory Arrangements

On April 28, 2020, the Company extended an offer of employment that was accepted by Mr. Michael Drozd to serve as the Company’s new Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Drozd officially joined the Company on May 18, 2020. Mr. Drozd will receive a base salary of $235,000 per year, which shall be subject to annual performance review by the Compensation Committee of the Board and may be revised by the Committee, in its sole discretion. Mr. Drozd is entitled to receive an annual 20% bonus, which may be a mix of cash and stock options, based upon his performance as determined by certain metrics to be established by the Board and Mr. Drozd. He received an initial grant of 100,000 restricted stock units under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), which will fully vest after one year of continued employment. Mr. Drozd is eligible to receive a quarterly award of 15,000 non-qualified stock options under the Equity Plan. At the time of issuance, the stock option award agreements will set forth the vesting, exercisability, and exercise price of the stock options as of the date of the grants.

On April 20, 2020, the Compensation Committee approved a 2020 Executive Compensation Plan for Ms. Fernandez-McGovern providing for an annual salary of $200,000, cash bonus of $30,000, quarterly stock option grants of 15,000 and restricted stock units (RSUs) of 125,000, with the cash bonus, option and RSUs dependent upon her achieving certain financial and operational milestones.

On July 20, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Company, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved a change in the compensation of the directors and of Ms. Nicole Fernandez-McGovern, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and EVP of Operations. The Compensation Committee engaged Albeck to perform an independent third-party study of compensation to assess the Company’s compensation of its Board and its executive officers in comparison to industry averages.

As a result of the study, and upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved an increase in Ms. Fernandez-McGovern’s annual salary from $200,000 to $220,000 and quarterly stock options from 12,500 to 15,000. In addition to the previously approved 2020 bonus structure, Ms. Fernandez-McGovern was awarded an additional performance-based bonus of $40,000, equal to 20% of her current salary. Also approved was a cash component for director compensation in the amount of $60,000 per year, payable quarterly, and an increase in quarterly stock options from 16,500 to 25,000 per director. The approved compensation is retroactive for all to July 1, 2020.

Existing Employment and Board Agreements

The Company has various employment agreements with various executive officers and directors of theCompany that serve as board members.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies – Continued

We have no other formal employment agreements with our executive officers, nor any compensatory plans or arrangements resulting from the resignation, retirement, or any other termination of our named executive officers, from a change-in-control, or from a change in any executive officer’s responsibilities following a change-in-control. However, it is possible we will enter into formal employment agreements with our executive officers in the future.

Valqari Agreement

On October 14, 2020, in connection with, and as an incentive to the entry into a two-year exclusive manufacturing agreement to produce a patented Drone Delivery Station for Valqari, the Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note (see Note 4).

Also, on October 14, 2020, AgEagle entered into a manufacturing agreement with Valqari for the manufacture and assembly of Valqari’s patented Drone Delivery Station, in accordance with the specification provided by, and the components designated by Valqari, for sale and delivery to its customers. AgEagle has been appointed as Valqari’s exclusive manufacturer of its products in the United States of America for a term of two-years, unless terminated earlier. Valqari, based in Chicago, Illinois, is engaged in the development, manufacture and sale of a patented Drone Delivery Station, including related software.

Note 11 – Related Party Transactions

The following reflects the related party transactions during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Transactions with Officers

The Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Nicole Fernandez-McGovern, is one of the principals of Premier Financial Filings, a full-service financial printer. Premier Financial Filings provided contracted financial services to the Company and their related expenses have been included within general and administrative expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, Premier Financial Filings provided services to the Company resulting in fees of $23,524 and $7,753, respectively.

One of our directors, Thomas Gardner, is one of the principals of NeuEon, Inc, which provide services to the company as CTO. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the company recognized $118,500 and $0, respectively, of expenses which is included in the general and administrative expense.

Following Barrett Mooney’s resignation as Chief Executive Officer effective May 2020 he agreed to provide consulting services to the Company, as needed, at a fixed fee of $4,500 per month on a month-to-month basis, plus reimbursement for travel expenses. On July 20, 2020, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, increased Mr. Mooney’s monthly fee for consulting services to $10,000 from $4,500 per month, which commenced on August 1, 2020 and ending on November 30, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the company recognized $66,500 of expenses which is included in the general and administrative expense related to those services.


AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

Note 12 – Income Taxes

Prior to April 15, 2015, AgEagle Aerial Inc. was treated as a disregarded entity for income tax purposes. Income taxes, if any, were the rentalresponsibility of certain lands located on the C&F Ranch. During the first quarter of 2018,sole member. In April 2015, the Company settled this disputeelected to be classified as a corporation for $9,000.income tax purposes, effective on April 22, 2015. Following the merger in 2018, AgEagle Aerial Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. and the group files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return as well as income tax returns in various states.

 

Note 7 -The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income Taxes

There which requires the Company to provide a net deferred tax asset or liability equal to the expected future tax benefit or expense of temporary reporting differences between book and tax accounting and any available operating loss or tax credit carryforwards. As of December 31, 2020, and 2019, the total of all net deferred tax assets was no current or$3,277,467 and $2,779,100, respectively. The amount of and ultimate realization of the benefits from the deferred tax assets for income tax expense (benefit)purposes is dependent, in part, upon the tax laws in effect, the Company’s future earnings, and other future events, the effects of which cannot be determined. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the realization of the deferred tax assets the Company has established a valuation allowance of $3,277,467 and $2,779,100 for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2019, respectively. The change in the valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2016.2020 and 2019 was $498,368 and $1,378,480, respectively.

  

The following table sets forth a reconciliation ofOn March 27, 2020, the provision for income taxesCoronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted in response to the statutory federal rate:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Statutory tax rate  35.00%  35.00%
State tax rate, net of federal tax  2.01%  1.78%
Other permanent items  0.00%  0.00%
Change in valuation allowance  (37.01)%  (36.78)%
Effective tax rate  0.00%  0.00%

Significant componentsCOVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, provides for an acceleration of alternative minimum tax credit refunds, the deferred tax assetsdeferral of certain employer payroll taxes, the availability of an employee retention credit, and liabilities are as follows:expands the availability of net operating loss usage. In addition, other governments in state and local in which we operate have also enacted certain relief measures.

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Non-current deferred tax asset:        
Oil and gas costs and long-lived assets $4,764,420  $11,500,697 
Derivative instruments      
Net operating loss carry-forward  21,547,347   35,815,113 
Valuation allowance  (26,311,767)  (47,315,809)
Net deferred tax asset (liability) $  $ 

 

On December 22, 2017,27,2020, the Tax Cuts and JobsConsolidations Appropriations Act, (TCJA)2021 (“CAA”) was signed into law.law and included in the government appropriations and additional economic stimulus. The TCJA, among other things, includes the reductionCAA enhances and expands certain provisions of the federalCARES Act. The CAA modifies the tax rate for corporations from 35%deductibility of expenses relating to 21%the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan forgiveness, Employee Retention Credit eligibility and changes or limits certain tax deductions includingextends other CARES Act provisions. We continue to monitor new and updated legislation, however the utilizationprovisions enacted have not had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

As of net operating losses. Under generally accepted accounting principles,December 31, 2020, the Company is required to revalue its deferred tax assetshas a federal and liabilities during the period in which the new tax legislation is enacted. The impact of TCJA resulted in a decrease in the Company's deferred tax assets in the amount of $18 million. However, there is no impact of the revaluation to the current net income because it was fully offset by the release of the valuation allowance that was previously recorded against the deferred tax asset.

At December 31, 2017, we have astate net operating loss carry forward of approximately $93 million expiring in 2021-2038 that is subject to certain limitations on an annual basis. Such limitation$11,982,988 and $10,193,848 respectively. Of those balances, the Company has not been determined, by Management. Management has determined that a 100% valuation allowance be established against$2,043,672 of federal net operating losses where it is more likely than not that suchexpiring in 2035-2037 and the remaining amounts have no expiration. The Company has state net operating loss carry forwards of $7,263,378 expiring in 2025-2030 and the remaining amounts have no expiration. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had a federal and state net operating loss carryforward of $6,606,771 and $6,397,792, respectively. The Act changed the rules on net operating loss carry forwards. The 20-year limitation was eliminated for losses incurred after January 1, 2018, giving the taxpayer the ability to carry forward losses indefinitely. However, net operating loss carry forward arising after January 1, 2018, will expire or will notnow be available before they are utilized.limited to 80 percent of taxable income.

 


The Company incurred a changetiming and manner in which we can utilize our net operating loss carry forward and future income tax deductions in any year may be limited by provisions of control as defined by the Internal Revenue Code (IRC 382). Accordingly,regarding the rules will limitchange in ownership of corporations. Such limitation may have an impact on the utilizationultimate realization of our carry forwards and future tax deductions. Section 382 of the Company’s net operating losses. The limitation is determined by multiplying the value of the stock immediately before the ownership change by the applicable long-term exempt rate. It is estimated that approximately $40.9 million ofInternal Revenue Code (“Section 382”) imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize net operating losses if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may be subject to an annual limitation.result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. Theyears, and the amount of the limitation may under certain circumstances be increased by the built-in gains in assets held by the Companyus at the time of the change that are recognized in the five-year period after the change. No assurance can be made,The Company has not conducted a formal ownership change analysis as required under Section 382; however, we intend to the availability ofdo so if we anticipate recognizing tax benefits associated with the net operating losses based upon Internal Revenue Code (IRC 382), as described,loss carryforwards.

As of December 31, 2020, we have determined it is more likely than not that we will not realize our temporary deductible differences and such amounts of net operating losses available, based upon the limitations described. If there was or is other changes of ownership, theloss carryforwards and have provided a full valuation allowance on our net operating losses may be a totally unavailable to offset taxable income.deferred tax asset.

 

Internal Revenue Code (IRC 108), Income from discharge of indebtedness has rules to determine amounts that are required to be included or excluded from taxable income, based upon certain circumstances. Management has determined that any discharge of indebtedness that has occurred is included in taxable income for this period, but is reviewing such amounts, as it applied to IRC 108.


Note 8 - Fair Value Measurements

We hold certain financial assets which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157,“Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC Topic 820-10”).   ASC Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are described below:

Level 1. Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access.  We believe receivables, payables and our debt approximate fair value at December 31, 2017.

Level 2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.  We consider the derivative liability to be Level 2.  We determine the fair value of the derivative liability utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX price quotations and contract terms.

Level 3. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. We consider the marketable securities to be a Level 3.

At December 31, 2016, our marketable securities had a value of $210,990. During 2017, as part of the LSA transaction described in “Note 2 – Going Concern” – “Financing Transactions”, we transferred the marketable securities. At December 31, 2017, we held no assets valued at Level 3. 

Note 9 - Derivative Instruments

We enter into derivative or physical arrangements with respect to portions of our crude oil production to reduce our sensitivity to volatile commodity prices and/or to meet hedging requirements under our Credit Facility.  We believe that these derivative arrangements, although not free of risk, allowed us to achieve a more predictable cash flow and to reduce exposure to commodity price fluctuations.  However, derivative arrangements limit the benefit of increases in the prices of crude oil.  Moreover, our derivative arrangements apply only to a portion of our production.

We had an Inter-creditor Agreement in place between the Company; our counterparties, BP Corporation North America, Inc. and Cargill Incorporated and our agent, Texas Capital Bank, N.A., which allows Texas Capital Bank to also act as agent for the counterparties for the purpose of holding and enforcing any liens or security interests resulting from our derivative arrangements.  Therefore, we were not required to post additional collateral, including cash.

At December 31, 2017 all derivative contracts had expired and we did not enter into any derivative contracts during 2017. 

We recorded a loss related to the mark to market of our derivative contracts for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $2,531,401. No gain or loss was recorded in 2017. 

Note 10 - Net Income Per Common Share

The Company reports earnings per shareaccounts for uncertain income tax positions in accordance with ASC Topic 260-10,“Earnings per Share.” Basic earnings per share740, Income Taxes. For 2020 and 2019, we did not recognize any uncertain tax positions, interest or penalty expense related to income taxes. We file U.S. federal and state income tax returns as necessary. The federal return generally has a three-year statute of limitations and most states have a four-year statute of limitations; however, the taxing authorities can review the tax year in which the net operating loss was generated when the loss is computed by dividingutilized on a tax return. We currently do not have any open income availabletax audits. The Company is open to common shareholders byfederal and state examination on the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.


Note 11 - Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties2017 through 2019 income tax returns filed.

 

PursuantA reconciliation of income tax expense at the federal statutory rate to full cost accounting rules, the Company must perform a ceiling test each quarter on its proved oil and natural gas assets within each separate cost center. All ofincome tax expense at the Company’s costs are included in one cost center because all of the Company’s operations are located in the United States. The Company’s ceiling test was calculated using trailing twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the-month prices for oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2017, which were based on a West Texas Intermediate oil price of $51.34 per Bbl and a Henry Hub natural gas price of $2.97 per MMBtu (adjusted for basis and quality differentials), respectively. The trailing twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the-month prices for oil and natural gas as of September 30, 2017, was based on a West Texas Intermediate oil price of $42.46 per Bbl and a Henry Hub natural gas price of $2.63 per MMBtu (adjusted for basis and quality differentials), respectively. The twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the –month price as of June 30, 2017 was $42.46 per Bbl and $2.63per MMBtu The twelve-month, unweighted-average first-day-of-the –month price as of March 31, 2017 was $45.16 per Bbl and $2.40 per MMBtu (adjusted for basis and quality differentials), respectively. Utilizing these prices, the calculated ceiling amount was greater than the net capitalized cost of oil and natural gas properties as of December 31, 2017, and as a result, no write down was recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $8,032,670. Additional material write-downs of the Company’s oil and gas properties could occur in subsequent quarters in the event that oil and natural gas prices remain at current depressed levels, or if the Company experiences significant downward adjustments to its estimated proved reserves.

Note 12 - Other Income

The following table depicts the components of other incomeeffective rate for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2019 is as follows:

  2020 2019
  Amount Rate Amount Rate
Computed tax at the expected statutory rate $(1,035,815)  21.00% $(1,182,446)  21.00%
State and local income taxes, net of federal  (162,671)  3.30%  (177,832)  3.16%
Permanent differences  (430,179)  8.70%  653   (0.01)%
Other adjustments  405,195   (8.20)%  (18,856)  0.33%
Return to accrual adjustment  725,102   (14.70)%      
Change in valuation allowance  498,368   (10.10)%  1,378,480   (24.48)%
Income tax benefit $     $    

The temporary differences, tax credits and carryforwards that gave rise to the following deferred tax assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2016:2020 and 2019 is as follows:

 

  Year ended
December 31,
2017
  Year ended
December 31,
2016
 
       
Realized gain (loss) clearing of derivative contracts $  $2,382,184 
Service Agreement with Camber Energy, Inc.  696,774    
Miscellaneous income  72   24,124 
Interest income  (3,967  32 
Other income (loss) $692,879  $2,406,340 
Deferred tax assets (liabilities): 2020 2019
Property and equipment $4,825  $7,452 
Other current liabilities  (4,601)  116,477 
Intangible assets  (31,678)  31,106 
Equity compensation  106,360   438,897 
Other accrued expenses  352,072   (61,877)
Net operating loss carryforward  2,850,489   2,247,045 
Total deferred tax assets  3,277,467   2,779,100 
Valuation allowance  (3,277,467)  (2,779,100)
Net deferred tax assets $  $ 

 


On April 27, 2017, the Company entered into a Services Agreement (“Service Agreement”) with Camber Energy, Inc., to perform certain outsourced interim services for $150,000 per month. Effective December 4, 2017, the Company and Camber Energy, Inc. (“Camber”), mutually agreed to terminate the agreement between the parties effective November 30, 2017.AGEAGLE AERIAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

 

Note 13 - Subsequent Events

 

MicaSense Acquisition

On January 31, 2018,26, 2021, the Company extended the end date of its previously disclosed Agreement and Plan of with AgEagle AerialSensor Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“AgEagle”) to March 31, 2018.

On February 20, 2018,wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company announced that it set(the “Buyer”), entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “MicaSense Purchase Agreement”) with Parrot Drones S.A.S. and Justin B. McAllister (the “Sellers”) pursuant to which the record date for the special meeting of its shareholdersBuyer agreed to among other things, consider and vote on various proposals necessary to close the previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 19, 2017 (the “Merger Agreement”), with AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. Shareholders of record asacquire 100% of the closeissued and outstanding capital stock of business on February 20, 2018, will be entitled to vote atMicaSense, Inc. (“MicaSense”) from the special meeting on March 21, 2018.Sellers. MicaSense manufactures and sells drone sensors for vegetation mapping. The Merger is subject to certain customary closing conditions and approval from our shareholders. The Merger is expected to close in the first quarter of 2018. 

As previously reported, on April 27, 2017, the Company entered into an Additional Issuance Agreement with Alpha Capital Anstalt, for the purchase of 300 restricted shares of the Company’s then newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in consideration for $300,000, with an option to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price for the shares of $200,000. AsMicaSense is $23,000,000, less the amount of DecemberMicaSense’s debt and subject to a customary working capital adjustment. The consideration is also subject to a $4,750,000 holdback to cover any post-closing indemnification claims and to satisfy any purchase price adjustments. The holdback is scheduled to be released in two equal installments, less any amounts paid or reserved for outstanding indemnity claims, on March 31, 2017,2022 and March 31, 2023 in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement.

A portion of the consideration is comprised of shares of Common Stock of the Company, had issued 300par value $0.001Common Stock, having an aggregate value of $3,000,000 based on a volume weighted average trading price of the Common Stock over a ten consecutive trading day period prior to the date of issuance of the shares of Series C Convertible PreferredCommon Stock for an aggregate purchase priceto the Sellers (the “Shares”). The Shares are issuable 90 days after the closing date of $300,000. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had received $200,000 from Alpha Capital Anstalt to purchase an additional 200 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, which shares had not been issued as of December 31, 2017, and which are reflected as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Issuable on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, in the aggregate amount of $200,000.

On February 13, 2018, the Company issued Alpha Capital Anstalt the 200,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock which it was due pursuanttransaction. Pursuant to the terms of the AprilPurchase Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2021, and a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2017, Additional Issuance Agreement, in consideration for2021, the $200,000 paid duringCompany has agreed to file a Form S-3 Registration Statement (the “Registration Statement”) covering the year ended December 31, 2017.

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Alpha Capital Anstalt converted (a) 343.671 sharesresale of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 5,610,955 shares of common stock;the Shares with the Securities and (b) 103.142 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into 1,683,944 shares of common stock, pursuantExchange Commission (the “SEC”) no later than ten days following the date the Shares are issued to the terms of such securities.

At a special meeting of shareholders held on March 21, 2018,Sellers. The Company shall use its best efforts to cause the Company’s shareholders approved (a)Registration Statement to be declared effective as soon as possible after the issuancefiling date, but in any event no later than 90 days after the filing date, and shall use its best efforts to keep the Registration Statement effective and in compliance with the provisions of the Company’s common stockSecurities Act (including by preparing and filing with the SEC such amendments, including post-effective amendments, and supplements to the shareholders of AgEagleRegistration Statement and the prospectus used in connection therewith as may be necessary) until all Shares and other securities covered by such Registration Statement have been disposed of. The Sellers are required to reimburse the Company up to $50,000 for reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by the Company in connection with such registration.

The Purchase Agreement contains certain customary representations, warranties and pursuantcovenants, including representations and warranties by the Sellers with respect to MicaSense’s business, operations and financial condition. The Purchase Agreement also includes post-closing covenants relating to the termsconfidentiality and employee non-solicitation obligations of the Merger Agreement in accordance with NYSE American Rules 712Sellers, and 713; (b) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to amend the 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock to: (i) allow the Company to pay all accrued but unpaid dividends up to September 30, 2017 in additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock based on the valueagreement of the liquidation preference thereof, (ii) eliminate the rightSellers not to compete with certain aspects of the Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive any dividends accruing after September 30, 2017, (iii) convert each sharebusiness of Series A Preferred Stock into 10 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment for a reverse stock split (discussed below)), and (iv) increase the number of Series A Preferred shares by 241,599 shares; (c) an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company to “AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.”; (d) the adoption of the EnerJex 2017 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); (e) the issuance of 2,248,264 shares of common stock to current officers and directors in lieu of deferred salary and fees, a majority of which will be held in escrow to secure the Company’s obligations under the Merger Agreement; (f) the conversion of the Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (g) the conversion of the Company’s 10% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American; (h) the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock, conversion of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock and conversion of $425,000 owed under five promissory notes held by, Alpha Capital Anstalt, of which $200,000 of the notes have previously been converted into Series C Preferred Stock as of the date of this filing, into shares of common stock in order to comply with the listing rules of the NYSE American.

The Plan provides for the grant of up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock (such number based on a post-reverse split amount) as awards which may include incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”), unrestricted shares, restricted shares, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, SARs, tandem stock appreciation rights, distribution equivalent rights, or any combination of the foregoing, to key management employees, non-employee directors, and non-employee consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (however, solely Company employees or employees of the Company’s subsidiaries are eligible for incentive stock option awards).

Additionally, the Company plans to conduct a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was approved by Company shareholders on April 27, 2017, prior toMicaSense following the closing of the Merger, whichtransaction. The completion of the Company anticipates occurring priortransactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement is subject to March 31, 2018.

 F-22

Note 14 - Supplemental Oilcustomary closing conditions, including, among others: (i) the absence of a material adverse effect on MicaSense, (ii) the delivery by the parties of certain ancillary documents, including the Registration Rights Agreement, and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)(iii) the execution by a key employee of MicaSense of an employment agreement. Subject to certain limitations, each of the parties will be indemnified for damages resulting from third party claims and breaches of the parties’ respective representations, warranties and covenants in the Purchase Agreement.

 

Results of operations from oil and gas producing activitiesF-35

 

The following table shows the results of operations from the Company’s oil and gas producing activities.  Results of operations from these activities are determined using historical revenues, production costs and depreciation and depletion. The results of operations from the Company’s oil and gas producing activities below exclude non-oil and gas revenues, general and administrative expenses, interest income and interest expense. Income tax expense was determined by applying the statutory rates to pretax operating results.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Production revenues $1,329,005  $2,461,727 
Production costs  (1,363,946)  (2,661,258)
Depletion and depreciation  (127,713)  (254,329)
Income tax  56,929   158,851 
Results of operations for producing activities $(105,725) $(295,009)

Capitalized costs

The following table summarizes the Company’s capitalized costs of oil and gas properties.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Properties subject to amortization $10,008,764  $18,626,746 
Accumulated depletion  (8,597,539)  (15,189,716)
Net capitalized costs $1,411,225  $3,437,030 

Cost incurred in property acquisition, exploration and development activities

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Acquisition of properties $  $14,399 
Exploration costs      
Development costs     2,690 
Net capitalized costs $  $17,089 

Estimated quantities of proved reserves

Our ownership interests in estimated quantities of proved oil and gas reserves and changes in net proved reserves all of which are located in the United States are summarized below.  Proved reserves are estimated quantities of oil and gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those that are expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Reserves are stated in barrels of oil equivalent. Geological and engineering estimates by Cobb & Associates, Inc. of proved oil and gas reserves at one point in time are highly interpretive, inherently imprecise and subject to ongoing revisions that may be substantial in amount. Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure that the reserve estimates are accurate, by their nature reserve estimates are generally less precise than other estimates presented in connection with financial statement disclosures.

    December 31, 2017      December 31, 2016   
Proved Reserves Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
  Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
 
                   
Beginning                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  372,140   152,610   524,750   1,287,028   202,884   1,489,912 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  44,780      44,780   47,345      47,345 
Natural Gas MCF’s  2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970   3,195,895   3,029,514   6,225,409 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  864,648   723,042   1,587,690   1,867,041   707,819   2,574,860 
                         
Revisions of previous estimates                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (30,572)  236,390   205,818   (856,765)  (50,274)  (907,039)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  1,870      1,870   (2,127)     (2,127)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (1,491)     (1,491)  (461,536)  392,651   (68,885)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (28,876)  236,390   207,514   (935,815)  15,169   (920,638)
                         
LSA Disposition                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (242,924)     (242,924)         
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (44,709)     (44,709)         
Natural Gas MCF’s  (2,684,865)  (3,422,165)  (6,107,030)         
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (735,110)  (570,432)  (1,305,542)         
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s                  
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (31,834)     (31,824)  (58,123)     (58,123)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (1,941)     (1,941)  (528)     (528)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (449)     (449)  (47,554)     (47,554)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (33,851)     (33,851)  (66,578)     (66,578)
                         
Ending                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   372,140   152,610   524,750 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s           44,780      44,780 
Natural Gas MCF’s           2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   864,648   723,042   1,587,690 


Estimated quantities of proved reserves

Our ownership interests in estimated quantities of proved oil and gas reserves and changes in net proved reserves all of which are located in the United States are summarized below.  Proved reserves are estimated quantities of oil and gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those that are expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Reserves are stated in barrels of oil equivalent. Geological and engineering estimates by Cobb & Associates, Inc. of proved oil and gas reserves at one point in time are highly interpretive, inherently imprecise and subject to ongoing revisions that may be substantial in amount. Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure that the reserve estimates are accurate, by their nature reserve estimates are generally less precise than other estimates presented in connection with financial statement disclosures.

    December 31, 2017      December 31, 2016   
Proved Reserves Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
  Total Proved
Developed
  Proved
Undeveloped
  Total
Proved
 
                   
Beginning                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  372,140   152,610   524,750   1,287,028   202,884   1,489,912 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  44,780      44,780   47,345      47,345 
Natural Gas MCF’s  2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970   3,195,895   3,029,514   6,225,409 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  864,648   723,042   1,587,690   1,867,041   707,819   2,574,860 
                         
Revisions of previous estimates                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (30,572)  236,390   205,818   (856,765)  (50,274)  (907,039)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  1,870      1,870   (2,127)     (2,127)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (1,491)     (1,491)  (461,536)  392,651   (68,885)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (28,876)  236,390   207,514   (935,815)  15,169   (920,638)
                         
LSA Disposition                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (242,924)     (242,924)         
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (44,709)     (44,709)         
Natural Gas MCF’s  (2,684,865)  (3,422,165)  (6,107,030)         
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (735,110)  (570,432)  (1,305,542)         
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s                  
                         
Production                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  (31,834)     (31,824)  (58,123)     (58,123)
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s  (1,941)     (1,941)  (528)     (528)
Natural Gas MCF’s  (449)     (449)  (47,554)     (47,554)
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  (33,851)     (33,851)  (66,578)     (66,578)
                         
Ending                        
Crude Oil BBL’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   372,140   152,610   524,750 
Natural Gas Liquids BBL’s           44,780      44,780 
Natural Gas MCF’s           2,686,805   3,422,165   6,108,970 
Oil Equivalents BOE’s  66,810   389,000   455,810   864,648   723,042   1,587,690 

Proved developed reserves at December 31, 2016 consisted of approximately 42% oil and 58% natural gas and totaled 879.8 MBOEs. Proved developed reserves for December 31, 2017 consisted of approximately 100% oil and totaled 66.8 MBOEs. Proved undeveloped reserves for December 31, 2016 were 707.8 MBOEs. Proved undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2017 were 389.0 MBOEs.

The Company annually reviews its proved undeveloped reserves to ensure an appropriate plan for development exists. The Company books proved undeveloped reserves only if it plans to convert these reserves to proved developed producing reserves within five years from the date they were first booked. At December 31, 2017 proved undeveloped reserves were approximately 389.0 MBOE’s. The Company plans to develop all the remaining locations that comprise the 389.0 MBOE of proved undeveloped reserves within five years. However, the decision to deploy capital and the timing of those expenditures is contingent on many different factors. The Company estimates capital expenditures of approximately $5.0 million will be sufficient to develop these reserves. The development plans assume a continued improvement in commodity pricing and general market conditions within the oil and gas industry.  

The calculation of proved undeveloped reserves requires the Company to make predictions regarding future acquisitions and discoveries and the impact they may have on the Company’s overall development plan of properties it currently owns. The development plan is revised to reflect changes in the oil and gas industry, including changing markets and prices, and new investment opportunities, and such revisions will result in changes to our proved undeveloped reserves. Consequently, the exact timing of capital expenditures will be heavily dependent upon the Company’s interpretation of market opportunities which are deeply influenced by projections of future commodity prices. Each year we will review our five year development plan to maximize the value of our investment in oil and gas assets and in turn maximize shareholder value. At December 31, 2017 we believe the following best characterizes our development plan.

  Estimated Conversion of
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
 
  CAPEX ($MM)  MBOE’s 
2018  648.0   77.5 
2019  965.9   93.5 
2020  1,244.8   80.7 
2021  563.8   37.5 
2022  1550.6   99.7 

For the year ended December 31, 2017 proved reserves decreased 1,131.9 MBOEs of which production accounted for 33.9 MBOEs or 3.0% of the decrease. The disposition of assets included in the Loan Sale Agreement (“LSA”) transaction resulted in a 1,305.5 MBOE decrease. An offsetting increase of 207.5 MBOEs, was due primarily to decreases in commodity prices. Crude oil prices increased $0.63 or 1%. Increased commodity pricing triggered positive revisions of 139.0 MBOEs of crude oil classified as proved undeveloped. In 2017 there were no material transfers from the proved undeveloped category of 6 reserves to the proved developed category.


For the year ended December 31, 2016 proved reserves decreased 987.1 MBOEs of which production accounted for 66.6 MBOEs or 6.7% of the decrease. The remaining decrease of 920.6 MBOEs, was due primarily to decreases in commodity prices. Crude oil prices decreased $3.49 or 8% and natural gas prices declined 20% or $.37. Diminished commodity pricing triggered negative revisions of 898.9 MBOEs of crude oil classified as proved developed producing. Natural gas liquids decreased pricing resulted in decreases of 3.6 MBOEs to the proved developed producing category. Reduced natural gas prices also reduced amounts classified as proved developed producing by 108.6 MMCF’s. In 2016 there were no material transfers from the proved undeveloped category of 6 reserves to the proved developed category.

In 2017 the Company invested approximately $4,600 in its oil and gas properties. These reduced expenditures were in response to extremely low commodity prices. The Company has approximately $1.0 million of current asset on hand and important infrastructure in Colorado completed which will facilitate the exploitation and development of proved undeveloped reserves over the next five years. At year end the Company’s review of proved undeveloped reserves revealed challenges but the Company maintains its belief that reserves will be developed within five years of their initial recording as a proved undeveloped reserve. In addition, it believes it has the financial wherewithal to develop all its proved undeveloped reserves within the five year time frames required; utilizing its balance sheet, to borrow funds as needed. Additionally, the Company believes it has the ability to joint venture any of its assets.

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows from our proved reserves for the periods presented in the financial statements is summarized below.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Future production revenue $20,714,780  $30,085,550 
Future production costs  (6,669,980)  (15,278,990)
Future development costs  (4,973,120)  (4,703,230)
Future cash flows before income tax  9,071,680   10,103,330 
Future income taxes      
Future net cash flows  9,071,680   10,103,330 
10% annual discount for estimating of future cash flows  (7,603,140)  (6,666,300)
Standardized measure of discounted net cash flows $1,468,540  $3,437,030 

Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

The following is a summary of a standardized measure of discounted net future cash flows related to the Company’s proved oil and gas reserves. The information presented is based on a calculation of estimated proved reserves using discounted cash flows based on the 12-month average price for oil and gas calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month prior period. The additions to estimated proved reserves from new discoveries and extensions could vary significantly from year to year. Additionally, the impact of changes to reflect current prices and costs of reserves proved in prior years could also be significant.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016 
Balance beginning of year $3,437,030  $8,769,970 
Sales, net of production costs  34,942   199,531 
Net change in pricing and production costs  16,312,304   (2,012,883)
Net change in future estimated development costs  269,890   (1,198,430)
Purchase of minerals in place      
Extensions and discoveries      
LSA Disposition  (1,902,726)   
Revisions  (17,693,233)  (4,538,173)
Accretion of discount  1,010,333   2,217,015 
Change in income tax      
Balance end of year $1,468,540  $3,437,030 

 F-25